HomeMy Public PortalAbout20140331 - Appropriations Committee - Meeting MinutesTown of Hopkinton Appropriation Committee (AC)
Minutes of Meeting on Monday, March 31, 2014
3rd Floor Meeting Area, Town Hall, Hopkinton, MA
In attendance:
Mike Manning
Pam Waxlax
Wayne Pacheco
Frank Sivo
Pat Mahon
Lt. Chuck Wallace
John Westerling
Suzanne Marchand
John Mosher
Chairman Manning called the meeting to order at 6:34 PM.
There were no public comments at the meeting.
Pat moved and Wayne seconded a motion to approve the minutes of our 3/26/2014 meeting as written.
The motion passed by a vote of 5-0.
Chuck Wallace, Lt. with the Hopkinton Police Department and interim Police Chief, met with the
committee to discuss the department's capital article as well as the operating budget. Prior to the start
of discussion Pat informed the committee that he needs to recuse himself from votes on Police budget
and articles as he left the DA's office in May 2013 and has a conflict of interest for one year from date of
leaving.
The only capital article from Police this year is for the purchase of 2 replacement vehicles, including
fitting one with an MDT (Mobile Data Terminal) and video system. The second vehicle will have the MDT
and video transferred from the old car. It was noted that MDTs have a 5 year replacement cycle and
videos have a 7 year cycle.
On the operating side they are replacing one officer who retired and hiring one new officer. Chuck noted
that within 5 years , one third of the staff will retire due to the mandatory retirement age of 65, losing a
number of years experience within the department. He also noted the greatest financial challenges over
the next decade will be fuel costs, maintaining the 10 year old building as it starts to age and young hires
who will have STEP increases the first 5 years they work for the department.
The committee continued the discussion of a possible underride tabled at the last meeting. Suzanne
presented a revised spreadsheet (see attachment 1) with corrected numbers for Scenario 2 with the
library funded via debt exclusion. Suzanne noted that the operating costs for the expanded library in
FY17 and FY18 are included in the model at $221k per year. Additionally the committee was informed
that the town and schools agreed that increases of 3% and 4% respectively in future years were
attainable. Scenario 3, the library funding not passing, was not considered as we need to assume the
library will pass before discussing the various underride amounts. Scenario 1, funding the library within
the levy limit, was also not considered as we previously voted to request that the library be funded
outside the levy limit at our 3/19/14 meeting.
Discussion noted that underrides are very rare since proposition 2 1/2 was put in place. Some towns
have excess levy because that's all the tax base can afford ( for example Marlborough) and other towns
go to the levy limit each year and put the excess in stabilization funds (for example Pepperell). If the
schools come in at 5% instead of 4% next year, the impact would be $373k in addition to the forecast.
There is still the question of the full cost of Full Day Kindergarten is in the forecast for later years since
this year's costs were offset by one-time charges. John Mosher also provided some insight from BOS
meetings regarding this topic. Although the underride is a non -binding article at ATM, the BOS have
requested the committee to propose an amount associated with the possible underride. 3 committee
members said they would support a $1M underride, 1 committee member would support an $800K
underride and 1 committee member supported no underride.
John Westerling, DPW Director, joined us to discuss snow & ice removal budget as well as his capital
articles. The town has overspent $150K beyond the $700K authorized and we're still waiting for a few
invoices which will likely add up to another $100K prior to year end.
Pam moved and Pat seconded to authorize the Town to incur liability and make expenditures in excess
of available appropriations for snow and ice removal in accordance with MGL Chapter 44, section 31D in
the amount of $250,000. The motion passed by a vote of 5-0.
John presented the DPW's capital articles:
• Hayden Rowe Traffic Calming (see attachment 2) for $400K. This is for the stretch of Hayden
Rowe between the tennis courts in front of the middle school to the Hopkins driveway. The
amount covers the design and construction. Both the Police and the Schools are in favor of it.
• 5 Year Sidewalk Master Plan (see attachment 3) for $1,519K. This is based on input for
community and links existing sidewalks as well as roadways that have need of sidewalks.
• Vactor Truck (see attachment 4) for $395K. The current truck is 13 years old and has a typical life
span of 15 years. The fan has been repaired in 2009 and 2012 and when it's out for repairs it's
gone for 6 weeks. This was on the ten year equipment replacement plan for this year already
and the lead time for the order is 9-10 months, so we won't get it until May 2015. This truck is
underweight and has been used in each of the 12 water main breaks this year, along with
frequent usage in other manners.
• Pilot Program to remove iron and manganese from wells 4 & 5 for $50K. The program will
determine if this is effective so the wells can be used throughout the year. If we're able to use
wells 4 & 5 during peak, we would not need to buy water from Ashland. The full implementation
depends if the pilot is successful and would cost hundreds of thousands if that is the case.
• Hayden Rowe Drainage for $80K. Issue is south on 85 on the left just before Milford. This is a
result of mediation. A catch basin is draining onto the property and this will create an easement
through the owner's property and extend the drainage.
John further noted that there were originally three 1 -ton vehicles on the 10 year replacement plan
which the DPW is not doing. Instead they have built into their operating budget the $33K cost to replace
the dump bodies of these trucks since the chassis are still in good condition and they expect to be able
to extend the lives 5-7 years.
At 9:23 PM Pat moved and Frank seconded a motion to adjourn. The motion passed unanimously, 5-0.
ezi-i tch ov n i-
Town of Hopkinton
Impact Scenari os on Ta x Levy Worksh eets
Library Construction/Operating & Underrides
Fiscal 2015
Fiscal 2016
Fiscal 2017
Fiscal 2018
Scenario 1
Library P&I Inside Levy Limit
Library Operating 2017-2018
1,672,554
1,146,234 880,159
1,714,250
Scenario 1A
Scenario 1 + $500K Underride
1,160,054
620,921
341,714
1,162,344
Scenario 1B
Scenario 1 + $800K Underride
852,554
305,734
18,646
831,200
Scenario 1C
Scenario 1 + $1M Underride
647,554
95,609
(196,731)
610,437
Scenario 1D
Scenario 1 + $1.2M Underride
442,554
(114,516)
(412,109)
389,675
Scenario 1E
Scenario 1 + $1.6M Underride
32,554
(534,766)
(842,866)
(51,850)
Scenario 2
Library P&I Outside Levy Limit -Debt Excluded
Library Operating 2017-2018
1,672,554 1,146,234
1,443,109
2,264,690
Scenario 2A
Scenario 2 + $500K Underride
1,160,054
620,921
904,664
1,712,784
Scenario 2B
Scenario 2 + $800K Underride
852,554
305,734
581,597
1,381,640
Scenario 2C
Scenario 2 + $1M Underride
647,554
95,609
366,219
1,160,877
Scenario 2D
Scenario 2 + $1.2M Underride
442,554
(114,516)
150,854
940,115
Scenario 2E
Scenario 2 + $1.6M Underride
32,554
(534,766)
(279,916)
498,590
Scenario 3
Exclusive of Library P&I
Either not passed at ATM and/or Ballot for DE
1,672,554
1,146,234
1,666,035
2,492,074
Scenario 3A
Scenario 3 + $500K Underride
1,160,054
620,921
1,127,589
1,940,168
Scenario 3B
Scen ario 3 + $800K Underride
852,554
305,734
804,522
1,609,024
Scenario 3C
Scenario 3 + $1M Underride
647,554
95,609
589,144
• 1,388,261
Scenario 3D
Scenario 3+ $1.2M Underride
442,554
(114,516)
373,766
1,167,499
Scenario 3E
Scen ario 3 + $1.6M Underride
32,554
(534,766)
(56,990)1 725,973
3/31/2014 6:26 PM
S:\Library\Financial Model FY15 v.19 (TMR) Scenarios 1_2_3 v.3 (1)
Cl iettil e g kt,t a
Article XX - Hayden Rowe Traffic Calming
$400,000 for the survey, design, and construction of traffic
calming measures (berm bumpouts, islands, and striping ) to
calm the traffic flow through the school campus area.
5 Year Sidewalk Plan
5 Year Sidewalk Plan Goals:
• Increasing pedestrian safety,
• In creasing the walkability of
the community,
• Linking neighborhoods to o ne
another, schools, and
downtown
Developed usin g
• Sidewalk survey conducted by
Plannin g Board
• Citizen satisfactio n survey
• D iscu ssion with Town Staff,
including schools
a Mcidm'DGP* 3
Priorities established by Plan ning Board were to construct
sidewalks:
•Within 2 miles of schools
•Downtown area
•Co ntin uous sidewalk on West Main Street from Wood
Street to 495
•Continuous sidewalk on East Main Street from Clinton
Street to Ray Street
•Elm Street near High Street co nnecti ng to L umber Street
E xte nsion
Plan i ncl udes:
•Updating the sidewalk i nventory
•$50,000 in DPW operating budget for maintena nce and
repair of existing sidewalks
•Construction of new sidewalk segments:
$150 / foot estimate used for bitumino us concrete berm
and wearing surface (granite curb w/ concrete
sidewalk= $200/foot) covers Sur vey, Design, Tree
removal, Ledge removal, Environme ntal permitti ng,
Installation of drainage & walls, & Easements
3l 3 \ \4
5 Year Sidewalk Plan
Segment
Street
Length
Cost
Segment
Connecti vity
�E
prr la { a
.
I
Ash St
110'
$35,000
Center School
New
.,
2
Ash St
1,700'
$255,000
Pike -Carriage
Hill
Extend Existing
! I. iF
i h
galit
diE
a f
'.. r.:��...
I it
$149,000
!
Carriage Hill-
Blueberry
Extend New
.I
5 Year Sidewalk Plan
Segment
Street
Length
Cost
Segment
Connectivity
4
Wood St
1,500'
$
$225,000
Elm -Proctor
Extend Existing
5
West Main St
2,500'
$375,000
Whalen -Lumber
Connect Existing
.............. .. ... ... ._...... ....... ....
6 .:
I :
Elm St
500'
$75,000
=�
Ext
, -
umber �;
sa
Connect Existing
5 Year Sidewalk Plan
Segment
Street
Length
Cost
Segment
Connectivity
7
East M ain St
2,700'
$405,000
Legacy -Clinton
Extend Existing
*
Ea st Main St
4,800'
Legacy Farms
Ray -Legacy
Extend Existing
Id l
}} � 1f
{ l' vlA.u'jj;13:. .....0
•1:.: d �x"
+':F�.. . <•.I., ::,..:. .
,.�.:.. : �r,.7v ;d•. �:1-:�'':v{' ti's
I .0 i.,.. .."'s,. :tIt—}i
{ Y 4r
IG� 8
rla2
V.
�
t
Ti4iyly.. rl,
4M
1�' �" 1'a�
''. iµ: .*+. �+
14
�i
^Q,000't
.. .:::i{;
�rl .: ..:..:"
:r
:._ f I:3L
1y
1 , w:n mi:
�y�y■ �JJp ,� :: .:
,' : I'::s
,: I'": . .: k:
� , :
Y L li
444 iiii
��
r. 1. �
._:i,a :+�. (
1,j��]{ :
' E!
� �
1::1.1.
,!�
IW � L.^. .__G:
e5
,. F, . ,7'.' 1 i= ::}I.,:::
��;- ;�
::
.I.
I
Current
New
aii-ctormat 4
Vactor Truck
•$395,000 for the replacement of a 2002
Vactor truck
•Most critical piece of eq uipment
duri ng emergency repairs to Highway,
Water, and Sewer infrastructure
•Replaces Town's current Vactor with
17,500 miles and $78k worth of repairs
on it
(Fu ndi ng split equally between three
divisio ns)
3) 3iJt4