HomeMy Public PortalAboutORD14226 i
BILL NO. 2007-40 A&SASAMENDED
•
SPONSORED BY COUNCILMAN KLINDT
ORDINANCE NO. �
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, APPROVING A CONCEPT PUD
PLAN FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 214 AND 216 DIX ROAD; CONSISTING OF PART OF
THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 44
NORTH, RANGE 12 WEST, JEFFERSON CITY, COLE COUNTY, MISSOURI.
WHEREAS, Fred and Dorothy Werdehausen and Bryan and Monda Werdehausen, owners of
the real estate hereinafter described, having submitted to the City Council a
Concept PUD Plan of said real estate, being located in Jefferson City, Cole County,
Missouri, and more particularly described as follows: Part of the Southeast Quarter
of the Southeast Quarter of Section 2, Township 44 North, Range 12 West,
described more particularly as follows: From the Northeast Corner of the Southeast
Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 2, Township 44 North, Range 12 West;
thence south along the section line 403.0 feet; thence west perpendicular to the
section line 30 feet to the place of beginning; thence continuing west perpendicular
to the section line 220 feet; thence south parallel to the section line 67.5 feet;
thence east perpendicular to the section line 220 feet; thence north parallel to the
section line 67.5 feet to the place of beginning.
ALSO: Part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 2,
Township 44 North, Range 12 West, and described as follows: From the Northeast
corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 2, Township 44
North, Range 12 West; thence south along the section line 470.5 feet; thence west
perpendicular to the section line 30 feet to the place of beginning; thence continuing
west perpendicular to the section line 220 feet; thence south parallel to the section
line 11.4 feet to the north line of the Missouri Pacific Railroad right-of-way land;
thence in a southeasterly direction along said right-of-way line 233.5 feet; thence
north parallel to the section line 90.5 feet to the place of beginning. Containing in all
0.67 acres.
WHEREAS, it appears that the procedures set forth in the zoning code relating to zoning have in
all matters been complied with, as said property owners submitted to the Planning
and Zoning Commission and City Council a Concept PUD Plan for the above
referenced property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON,
MISSOURI, AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Concept PUD Plan submitted by Fred and Dorothy Werdehausen and
Bryan and Monda Werdehausen on file as Case No. P07019 in the Jefferson City Planning
Division, for a 8,580 square foot office building is hereby approved for the above land referenced
herein.
1
•
i
SECTION 2. Approval is made subject to the following conditions: (1) Floor area ratio not to
• exceed 0.34 (8,600 sq. ft.); (2) The underlying zoning district for the purposes of establishing
allowed uses shall be C-O Office Commercial with the following uses excluded from the list of
allowed uses: (a) medical or dental offices or clinics and (b) drive-through uses and facilities. An
office for an individual doctor or dentist would be allowed; (3) Engineering Division approval of the
access drive on Dix Road and the adequacy of a 15' setback on the southern property line; (4)
Provide a 10 foot landscaping buffer with evergreens planted on ten-foot centers, with a
solid fence the length of the northern property line, with buffer and landscaping to be on
i the north side of the fence; and (5) additional excluded uses shall be as follow:
i
1. Assisted Living Facility
2. Community Residence-more than 5 persons
3. Neighborhood Center, Community Activity Building
4. Adult Day Care Center (more than 10 adults)
5. Child Day Care Center (more than 10 children)
6. Substance Abuse Treatment Facility-Inpatient and/or Outpatient
7. Hospital-Physical & Mental Rehabilitation (not for criminal or animal)-
Inpatient and Outpatient
8. Nursing, Convalescent Care-with building area less than 10,000 square feet
9. Nursing, Convalescent Care-with building area of 10,000 square feet or more
10. Recreational Facility, Public
11. Indoor Amusement Center
12. Telecommunications Facilities
• 13. Bed & Breakfast Inns-Not serving Food to the General Public
14. Bed & Breakfast Inns-Serving Food to the General Public
15. Off-Site Automobile Parking Facility, Garage or Lot
16. Commercial Automobile Parking Facility, Garage or Lot
17. Automatic Teller Machine as principal or accessory use; walk-up only
18. Drive-Through Uses and Facilities not elsewhere specified
19. Food Service-Drive-In and/or Drive Through
20. Broadcasting Station/Radio or Television
SECTION 3. Common Areas and Public Land. No common areas are proposed.
SECTION 4. Access: The site will obtain access from Dix Road via a single driveway.
2
i
i
• SECTION 5. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after the date of its
passage and approval.
Passed: v Approved:
Presiding Officer Mayor
ATTEST: d---/APPROVED AS TO FORM:
le
City Clerk City Counselor
> A
I C)
•
3
•
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
• Rezoning, Associated Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment, and Concept PUD Plan
214 and 216 Dix Road
The City Council of the City of Jefferson, Missouri, will hold a public hearing on Monday, July 16,
2007 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber of the John G. Christy Municipal Building, 320 East
McCarty Street, to consider rezoning the land located at 214 and 216 Dix Road Drive from RS-3
Medium Density Residential to PUD Planned Unit Development, an associated amendment to the
Development Plan Map of the City's Comprehensive Plan, and a Concept PUD Plan for an 8,580
square foot office building:
Section 1. Property Description: From the Northeast Corner of the Southeast Quarter of the
Southeast Quarter of Section 2, Township 44 North, Range 12 West; thence south along the
section line 403.0 feet; thence west perpendicular to the section line 30 feet to the place of
beginning;thence continuing west perpendicular to the section line 220 feet;thence south parallel
to the section line 67.5 feet; thence east perpendicular to the section line 220 feet; thence north
parallel to the section line 67.5 feet to the place of beginning.
ALSO: Part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 2, Township 44
North, Range 12 West, and described as follows: From the Northeast corner of the Southeast
Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 2, Township 44 North, Range 12 West; thence south
along the section line 470.5 feet; thence west perpendicular to the section line 30 feet to the place
of beginning; thence continuing west perpendicular to the section line 220 feet; thence south
parallel to the section line 11.4 feet to the north line of the Missouri Pacific Railroad right-of-way
land; thence in a southeasterly direction along said right-of-way line 233.5 feet; thence north
parallel to the section line 90.5 feet to the place of beginning. Containing in all 0.67 acres.
• Section 2. Rezoning application.The property is proposed to be rezoned from RS-3 Medium
Density Residential to PUD Planned Unit Development.
Section 3. Associated Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment. Designation of the property
is proposed to be revised from Low Density Residential to Commercial on the Development Plan
Map.
Section 4. Concept PUD Plan. The Proposed Concept PUD Plan involves the construction
of a 2 story 8,580 square foot office building and 29 parking spaces. The underlying zoning district
proposed for the property for the purpose of establishing allowed uses is C-O Office Commercial.
The application was filed by Fred and Dorothy Werdehausen and Bryan and Monda Werdehausen,
property owners. The complete application is on file as Case No. P07019 and is available for
inspection during regular business hours at the Department of Community Development, Planning
Division, Room 120, John G. Christy Municipal Building, 320 East McCarty Street, Jefferson City,
Missouri.
Phyllis Powell, City Clerk,
City of Jefferson, Missouri
P.T. - Friday, June 29, 2007
Department of Community Development/Planning Division
320 East McCarty Street, Room 120, Jefferson City, Missouri 65101
Contact: Anne Stratman or Janice McMillan
Phone (573) 634-6475 Fax (573) 634-6457
•
1
EXCERPT OF UNNAPPROVED MINUTES
JEFFERSON CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
June 14, 2007
5:15 p.m.
COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT ATTENDANCE RECORD
Mike Berendzen, Chair 1 of 1
David Hagan 1 of 1
Rhonda Hoskins 1 of 1
David Nunn 1 of 1
Chris Jordan, Alternate 1 of 1
Jack Deeken, Alternate 1 of 1
Chris Yarnell, Alternate 1-of 1
COMMISSION MEMBERS ABSENT
Randy Bickel 0 of 1
Bob George 0 of 1
John Lake 0 of 1
Ralph Robinett, Vice Chairman 0 of 1
EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS
Dan Klindt, City Council Liaison 1 of 1
STAFF PRESENT
Janice McMillan, Deputy Director of Planning & Transportation Services
Eric Barron, Senior Planner
Drew Hilpert, Associate City Counselor
• Shane Wade, Civil Engineer II
David Bange, Engineering Division Director
Anne Stratman, Administrative Assistant
Beth Pafford, Planning Division Intern
GUESTS PRESENT
Wayne Senville, Editor, Planning Commissioners Journal
Case No. P07019 f 214 and 216 Dix Road; Rezoning, Comprehensive Plan
Amendment, and Concept PUD Plan. Request filed by Fred and Dorothy Werdehausen
and Bryan and Monda Werdehausen, property owners, to rezone approximately 0.67 acres
from RS-3 Medium Density Residential to PUD Planned Unit Development, an associated
comprehensive plan amendment, and a concept PUD plan. The property is located on the
northwest corner of the intersection of Industrial Drive and Dix Road and is described as part
of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 2, Township 44 North, Range 12
West. (Central Missouri Professional Services, Consultant).
Mr. Duane Schreimann of Schreimann, Rackers, Francka and Blunt, LLC, 2316 St. Mary's
Boulevard, Suite 130, spoke regarding this request. Mr. Schreimann explained that the applicant
is proposing to rezone the subject property in order to construct a two story office building, with
proposed access off of Dix Road. He stated that there will be some improvement to the drive
and parking area surrounding the property. Mr. Schreimann explained that the Jefferson City
School District presently owns a parking area behind the subject property and will retain
ingress/egress rights in order to access Dix Road. He stated that the current residential drive
that serves the property will be eliminated. Mr. Schreimann stated that the property owners have
agreed to restrictions set by staff that there be no medical or dental offices or clinics and no
drive-through uses and facilities, however an office for an individual doctor or dentist would be
allowed.
Excerpt of Unapproved Minutes/Jefferson City Planning &Zoning Commission Page 2
• June 14, 2007
Mr. Mike Bates, Central Missouri Professional Services, 2500 E. McCarty Street, spoke
regarding this request. Mr. Bates distributed visuals depicting the rezoning request and the
concept PUD plan. He reiterated that the Jefferson City Public School District has
ingress/egress rights across the Werdehausen property. Mr. Bates stated that while the
Werdehausen's have no rights to use the Industrial Drive access, the school district will continue
to use it. He explained that the concept PUD plan will come back before the Commission as a
Preliminary and Final PUD Plan.
Mr. Kevin Meinhardt, 220 Boonville Road, spoke regarding this request. Mr. Meinhardt
stated that the proposed office building will match the scale-and materials-used for the-existing
residential houses in the area.
The following individuals voiced their concerns of safety for school children due to an
increase in traffic, retaining residential neighborhood characteristics and businesses that could
be detrimental to the neighborhood:
Katie Winkler, 213 Dix Road
Leonard Vader, 208 Dix Road
In response to a Commissioner's question, Mr. Vader stated that he preferred the existing
poorly maintained residence rather than a new office building.
Correspondence in opposition to the proposed rezoning request was received from the
following individuals:
• Vern & Nancy Nesheim, 211 Dix Road
Susan Faerber, 206 Donald Avenue
Al Collier, 609 Norris Drive
Signed petition from adjacent property owners
Lois Vader and Leonard Vader, 208 Dix Road
Roger Engelby, 209 Dix Road
Lawrence and Peggy Colozza, 206 Dix Road
In response to the opposition's concerns, Mr. Bates stated that he understands the
neighbors concerns, however the PUD process affords the best opportunity for success. He
explained that a PUD Plan would be subject to review by staff regarding location and design of
the building and other site improvements. He explained that since this is a concept PUD plan
the applicant is proposing the maximum allowed and is subject to change.
Ms. Katie Winkler reiterated that she wants the integrity of the neighborhood to remain
residential and is opposed to any type of commercial development.
Mr. Barron gave the Planning Division staff report and explained that the concept PUD plan
proposes a two story brick office building with 8,600 square feet. He stated that the applicant is
proposing an underlying zoning of C-O Office Commercial.
Ms. McMillan clarified that the concept PUD Plan must come back before the Commission in
the form of a Preliminary and Final PUD Plan. She stated that with a concept PUD plan,
whatever is presented tonight may or may not appear on the final plan.
•
Excerpt of Unapproved Minutes/Jefferson City Planning &Zoning Commission Page 3
June 14, 2007
Mr. Nunn cited an example that, in The Diamonds Subdivision, office and commercial uses
can exist in a single family residential neighborhood with no detrimental effects. He stated that
the PUD process gives an opportunity for the developers to work with the neighborhood and that
the Commission determines whether a proposal meets the requirements for a PUD district.
Mr. Nunn moved and Mr. Jordan seconded to approve the following requests relating to 214
and 216 Dix Road:
A. Comprehensive Plan Amendment changing the designation of the property from
low density residential to commercial;
B. Rezoning from RS-3 Single Family Residential to PUD Planned Unit
Development;
C. Concept PUD Plan for a two story office building with a total floor area of 8,580
square feet and 29 parking spaces with the following conditions:
(1) Floor Area Ratio not to exceed .34 8,600 s . ft.
( q )
(2) Underlying zoning district shall be C-O with the following uses excluded from
the list of allowed uses: (a) medical or dental offices or clinics and (b) drive-
through uses and facilities. An office for an individual doctor or dentist would be
allowed.
(3) Engineering Division approval of the access drive on Dix Road and the
adequacy of a 15' setback on the southern property line.
The motion passed 6-0 with the following votes:
Aye: Deeken, Hagan, Hoskins, Jordan, Nunn, Yarnell
•
*ftersol
CL
1
INDUSTR�A
H N
w 1
360 Feet g
0
180
360 d
d 2�6 pix R RS 3 to P e�dment
��d an from _...n Am
City of Jefferson Planning & Zonin g Commission
• LOCATION
�'^��
M p
� lr"3` k a.s {C+.a
� .�LL S`i4 a"�`�S L'���d���-r�•`.it.fi..�g"a` p�i '� p`� c--� �q(' r t �r'� a. � ��ar✓�4Pf���t��nxk" s,+ft ,+4a`y
} Y ,( •
l"�q".z++� y�4 � S4L'� M R �� 7 n•� Tz'e 7_ � � .,�`�"``���r �4kf'!�''.+�'�."r4�6 E�'' +*����1`^;
+il "- .h Y oar."•0.a a:• e'% .rr{ vo-a*'�. Oft 4 3, a*�d`v $ '�- '� i"' .., `.`,.s •r.
rdt � M �+ { a. xt. �la6.5�r• � y �
+t�"F � � '�' {�'' Kc�.. � • �� �- �'�Y' sus k
n�
$f
w,
��2a'}'A�{"a 'r F• V �° tx��cfi� xw. t� � r` � 1 "?' � r• �a � h r .+ a �Z �.� a,�7'�*�d Y rx�
- '`�Trt"° L '>�:� '4'"'Yr a r^t'NC� � �.,+� r S'C�x,,w�"? '"+•°�-.ka�4 a -1+ �+.+�['�''�'.�d �q � {y4? 'u+�,'�.
.F.
�.� p
�hr tr Y
�g
S}.� �j. `+ °c�Cam¢ + �..� ` ,'A "-•"� �,u�� �v,K t'� � '� ��:� *� " - �a�"�,�,c"a'a-.- .w;
5 +5K*i
tt � �`�� ENO
+ x�.q, z• 9i4 xx c k �r4 _ + mot' ,...}7 saa` M`�
t-, s�-"'q,.�at
MA yh-'t} �f# -,,c 1 :�d}' '' F''.`'��. '�jr fit> �.. Kr ^� ,:«•
Y 'rox"+ a s x.: t ° Y w J "�fx a v ° ''S M. a7"' +.
'�jihr A�n• 44 �tj S �'1`r,Ht{ `f �� x �" .F3 <�� ++� C �&,ro y � -Y
N ° `LJX'.&SY::
Ulu
w�q✓p°:' '�'�i�,f:"� �.. � +i'' i� r'+� } „1?s'' rr�rjj}'r�-��"3 y,yy�.'4����+1�'�^r+������Y 1� �� r r`' �ate'
4 t r'§ ,.iP' ' �= T i 7 j 'L l•t.� 1�f+lY .yx '+3X. 'b' � �,p
,�,'yyr`�' � r.+"� b,' s r tt' � k s. s .t`.r,-�35 a �� 'r -�g + '�'�'tir •
� �.jdr�, ���°�`.a [ �..� .i r *�' �3s ��� f. �. �fi'�-+3�.ve �� tt- [�rx�Sq 2+.'��• ,x.� 'a..,��� ��Y'G �s at
�. �9'd
�87��FP+
Eefy l✓J�a a
rry�ro {°` ,� � E,
Y!'{
IL e
3 i r�
tt C�y�krkt
°.+. �^hf�zfn
xi N i''"�t;�>ix 1; �x a'� _.c. �..4n •ra, ""'. d � }r �-� �� -;,�. 't'M
y ' `,xa? �i �� �`� �Y t 7�"" a j�t � ��a,• �_� �.r�`R�3r 3+. .x�P'Sr1� <�`�S,. ,k �' `�.
v Wa', n✓ � S a a jf�t ? � w t sG a a a
Y!kf1 � �� S7i 5v E f-r�3'a13�,. .b'. S �tF Y �
tt
cfl,, vi. �.ei!'..1`-----`•. _aC�� :�r't'.: a Y� r+. '>.r �+ /
mss.. s:
N
170 85 0 170 Feet
W + E
• 214 and 216 Dix Road S
A. Rezoning from RS-3 to PUD
B. Comprehensive Plan Amendment
C. Concept PUD Plan
APPLICATION ION FCP PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD)
Dare Received
City of Jefferson - Planning Division �
® Department of Community Development
320 East McCarty Street - Jefferson City, Missouri 65101
Phone (573) 63476410 Fax (573) 634-6457
Concept PUD Plan and Rezoning(a Rezoning Application must also be submitted)
C Preliminary PUD Plan and Rezoning (a Rezoning Application must also be submitted)
❑ Preliminary PUD Plan (where land is already zoned PUD)
❑ Final PUD Plan (where land is already zoned PUD)
❑ Final PUD Plan and Subdivision Plat(when the subdivision of land into lots is required)
PUD Project Name: Werdehausen Office Building
Street Address: 214 & 216 Dix Road
Legal Description (as follows or is attached): See Attached Exhibit "A"
Please attach or include the following:
cih_ .Jevpl...�,..e rlinn land uses
(a) Typed project narrative describing the fype and.charaeter ui IIIC UCVCiu�lliolit i„Ciu� i y
acreage, proposed residential densities or commercial floor area (FAR); public or private open
space, amenities or recreation areas to be provided; sidevvalks and pedestrian ways; parking areas;
deviations from minimum design standards of Section 35-51; project phasing plan, if applicable; and
other information required by Section 35-74 or applicable sections of the Zoning Code. The project
'title and location must be included upon every page. Number all pages and attachments.
(b) Site Plan and/or Development Plan, as applicable.
(c) Preliminary or Final Subdivision Plat or Declaration of Condominium Association, as applicable;
(d) Draft of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions, as applicable;
(e) Traffic impact analysis, if required by Section 35-60;
(f) Signage Plan, including type, locations and dimensions of all proposed signs;
(g) Landscaping and Screening Plan;
(h) Lighting Plan, including pole heights, type of fixtures or luminaries, and foot candles;
(i) Filing fees
Please supply tour(4) copies of all required material for initial staff review,Additional copies may be required for
distr ibufion to the Planning and Zonings Commission and City Council,in the number as specified by staff..
Application information: Werdehausen Trusts
.Applicant Name (if different from owner): c/o Fred C. Werdehausen
Address P.O. Box 1.56, Holts Summit, MO 65043
Phone Number(s): Contact: Dorothy J Werdehausen 896-5155 (w) 680=7222 (m)
(Attach, ProjectlApplicant Information Sheet if more space is necessary)
Consultant Name: Central Missouri Professional Services, Inc.
Address: 2500 East McCarty Stre t effPrson Citz. Mn 65101
Phone Number(s): 634-3455 (o) 634-8898 (f)
attached inf r7latioP� a�� rates r represan"s this proposed prOjG; t.
Fred C. Werdehausen Dorothy J. Werdehausen
ert! 'wner Signature ?rinted Name Date I
r f
%/y----- n K. Werdehausen Monda Julie Werdehausen �I
Cons i t�IgnaiUre n �rlitted h aisle Date
For Sra Use Gnly:
�iicatior,Filing Fee Received: Amount Check r
�Cf oc`irrlenls: [Varative Site R ar A--Jpii antlProiect i iiormation Sh-set
%,._'i7(; _C L•':�,^,.',liii:u: ! , - II
i
• CONCEPT PUD PLAN NARRATIVE
WERDEHAUSEN OFFICE BUILDING
214 & 216 DIX ROAD
a. The proposed project anticipates constructing a two level brick office building.
The lower level will walk out on grade. Parking will be a surfaced lot. Access to
site will be from Dix Road. The drive entrances will be located in essentially the
same area as the existing entrance to the parking lot to-the north-ofthe existing
house, which will be removed. Sidewalks currently on Dix Road, none are
planned along Industrial Drive. The total floor area for the building is 8580 square
feet or 4290 square feet per floor. A Type B buffer is planned for the northern
property line. FAR is 0.34.
i
b. A concept site plan is attached for review.
I
C. There is no requirement for a plat or condominium by laws.
d. There are no planned restrictions.
e. The project does not require a site specific Traffic Impact Study.
• f. The will be a small monument sign and signage on the building in conformance
with the City's current sign ordinance.
g. See the attached concept plan.
h. Night use of the facility is not anticipated, therefore there is no free standing
lighting.
L Filing fees are attached.
• EXHIBIT "A"
PART OF `CHE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 2, I'OWNSNIP 44
NOR'ITI, RANGE 12 WEST,1DESCRIBED NIORF PARTICULARI-N AS FOLJ�OWS:
FROTvI THE NORTREAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER Or THE SOU;I'I-II 11ST QUAl>,T)-1� or,
SECTION 2, TOW14SHIP 44 NORTH, RANGE I2 WEST;THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE SECTION LNE 403.0 Ft;3 T;
THENCE'- WEST PERPENDICULAR. TO THE SECTION LINE 30 FEET TO THE PLACE OF 3F-,GINNllgG; `l"k ElgCE
CONTINUIIJG WEST PE.R E)117ICULAIZ TO THE SECTION LINF,220 FEET; TI MNCE SOUTH RAKALLEL TO THE
SECTION LRt E 67.5 FEET; THENCE EAST PERPENDICULAR TO THE SECTION LINE 220 FEET; TI-1314C;
NORTH PARALLEL TO THE SECTION LINE,67.5 FEET TO T11E PLACE OF BEGIN14ING.
ALSO; PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTETR,OF SECTION 2, TOIAINSHIP
44 NORTH, RANGE 12 WEST, AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF
SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 44 NORTH, RANGE 12 WEST;THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE SECTION LINE 470.5 FEET;
THENCE WEST PERPENDICULAR. TO THE SECTION LINE 30 FEET TO THE PLACE OP �3EGrNNI'NG; 'CI-IENCE
CONTINUING WEST PERPENDICULAR TO THE SECTION LINE 220 FEET;THENCE SOUTH PARALLEL TO THE
SIrCTIQN LINE 11.4 FEET TO THE ?NORTH LINE OF THE MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT-OF--WA.Y
LAND; THENCE IN A 500THEASTER1,Y DIRECTION ALOriG SAID JUGHT-OF-WAY LINE 2.33.5 FEET; THENCE,
NORTH PARALLM- TO THE SECTION LINE 90.5 FEET TO THE PLACE OF DEOINNING.
S0BJECTTO EA-SET 1ENTS AliD RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD.
s c
zo
ol
t MR
ILIA
Vx
co
St
ml
i TIT
t \Vi II t2
� v
IT
� g
ti
OW'/(!0 uosJa}Iar
anuQ 1eu4snpul V ppoM X!Q 0
3?fI Jaunn
6u!ppEj 03910 mON c e
i
i
i
a"a
x a
CV
CL
• R V
Dp N
XD
�D
a�
- -- _-_
gib
BE
s
i
ow 4D uosio.4@r
anup leulsnpul B peon xla M I
6ulPlln6 00WO mON
_ t
is
x
i.
S e
r
j
o 0
to
Na
§ c 4)
nt
Es c
• R L .J C O
3 }
5:.
C)
x s
or J
♦�` lo'►
o s
City of Jefferson john Landwehr
- Mayor
• Department of Community Development Patrick E. Sullivan, P.E.; Director
320 East McCarty Street Phone: (573) 634-641 0
Jefferson City, Missouri 65101 Fax: (573) 634-6457
zs
May 30, 2007
Dear Property Owner:
This letter is to notify you that the Jefferson City Planning and Zoning Commission will meet at 5:15
p.m. on Thursday, June 14, 2007 in the Council Chambers of the John G. Christy Municipal Building,
320 East McCarty Street, to consider the following matter(see map on back):
Case No. P07019 — 214 and 216 Dix Road; Rezoning, Comprehensive Plan
Amendment, and Concept PUD Plan. Request filed by Fred and Dorthy Werdehausen
and Bryan and Monda Werdehausen, property owners, to rezone approximately 0.67
acres from RS-3 Medium Density Residential to PUD Planned Unit Development, an
associated comprehensive plan amendment, and a concept PUD plan. The property is
located on the northwest corner of the intersection of Industrial Drive and Dix Road and
is described as part of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 2,
Township 44 North, Range 12 West. (Central Missouri Professional Services,
Consultant)
As a nearby landowner and/or neighbor, you have the privilege of attending this hearing. Unfortunately,
we are unable to record comments received by telephone, however, written comments may be directed
to the Planning and Zoning Commission in one of the following ways:
• e-mail: jcplanning @jeffcitymo.org
fax: Dept. of Community Development/ Planning Division 573-634-6457
mail: Dept. of Community Development/ Planning Division
John G. Christy Municipal Building, 320 E. McCarty Street Jefferson City, MO 65101
Written comments received on or before 1:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting will be made a part of the
official record and copied and distributed to Commission members at the meeting. Those unable to
provide written comments in advance are invited to deliver their comments to the Commission
Chairman only at the meeting. Correspondence received after 1:00 p.m. will be included in the official
record, but there is no guarantee that copies will be made for distribution to all Commission members.
For your information, this case is tentatively scheduled for a public hearing in front of the City Council
on July 16, 2007. The City Council meets at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the John G. Christy
Municipal Building, 320 East McCarty Street.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact us at 573.634.6475.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Eric Barron, AICP
Senior Planner
ty or
.,ill
;ref ersong
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT `� W
Jefferson City Plawming& Zoning Commission
Property Owners List
Case No. P07019 214 & 216 Dix Road June 14, 2007
City of Jefferson Herbert Taylor
320 E. McCarty Street PO Box 1762
Jefferson City, MO 65101 Jefferson City, MO 65102
Industrial Drive 219 Dix Road
221 Dix Road
DeLongs Inc. 223 Dix Road
PO Box 479
Jefferson City, MO 65102 UMB Properties, Inc.
301 Dix Road 906 Grand Boulevard, 10th Floor
Kansas City, MO 64106
Roger & Jerry Engelby 300 Dix Road
209 Dix Road
Jefferson City, MO 65109 Frank & Chantelle Underwood
209 Dix Road 210 Dix Road
Jefferson City, MO 65109
Faith Luthem Church 210 Dix Road
2027 Industrial Drive
Jefferson City, MO 65109 Lois & Leonard Vader
2027 Industrial Drive 208 Dix Road
Jefferson City, MO 65109
Oscar Jr. & Juanita Muck 208 Dix Road
211 Donald Avenue
Jefferson City, MO 65109 Katie Lee Winkler
211 Donald Avenue Sean McClellon
213 Dix Road
Vernon & Nancy Lee Nesheim Jefferson City, MO 65109
211 Dix Road 213 Dix Road
Jefferson City, MO 65109
211 Dix Road UMB Bank
300 Dix Road
School District of Jefferson City Jefferson City, MO 65109
Missouri 300 Dix Road
315 E. Dunklin Street
Jefferson City, MO 65101
204 Dix Road
Phillip & Alessandra Skanes
212 Dix Road
Jefferson City, MO 65109
212 Dix Road
Christina Stafford
213 Donald Avenue
Jefferson City, MO 65109
• 213 Donald Avenue
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
• CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
June 14, 2007
Case No. P07019
214 & 216 Dix Road
Sender Senders How Date_
Address Received Received
Vern & Nancy Nesheim 211 Dix Road Fax 6/14/2007
Susan Faerber 206 Donald Avenue Hand delivered 6/14/2007
Al Collier 609 Norris Hand delivered 6/14/2007
Petition from Property Owners See Attached Petition Hand delivered 6/14/2007
Adjacent to 214 & 216 Dix Road
Lois Vader& Leonard Vader 208 Dix Road Hand delivered 6/14/2007
Roger Engelby 209 Dix Road Email 6/11/2007
Lawrence & Peggy Colozza 206 Dix Road Mail 6/11/2007
•
_T I_IN- 14-117 12 :4-1 FM OGAPK. CLAIM;_ SEF:%.--10E 1+5 7:,: -+-6--,G 5 4 5 4
RECEIVED
jUN, 2ob�
DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Joe 14, 2007
TO:: Planning and Zoning Commission members
RE: Case 9P07019
We were among the group of neighbors that appeared before you two years ago for the
same type of rezoning. Our opposition to this new request remains the same.
Like the rest of our neighbors, we feel very strongly about this block remaining a
residential area, We moved into our home at 211 Dix Rd. 28 years ago and enjoyed
raising our family of seven children in an area perfect for families— close to schools,
�. swirnming pool and park, downtown, our church and businesses on Missouri Boulevard.
Now our children are grown and gone and we have made a conscious decision to stay
righi here. We've always felt safe and love being close to things we need. The question
of what kind of traffic, businesses, bright lights at night and the possibility of unknown
people in and around the neighborhood coming from this business area make us feel less
safe*living by ourselves as we get older.
The argument that the current plans would not be a threat is not reassuring since there is
no guarantee in the years ahead.
The;fact that the City needs to retain a good residential buffer zone here is still valid. The
other side of West Main has already dealt with businesses on the corner of Dix and Main.
Thar'zoning will not be changed, but we do not need to add to the problem on the other
end of Dix.
We agree with the points made by Leonard Vader in his communication to you: the
residential boundaries should be maintained; the possibility for more zoning changes; the
school and EER Center will be affected; our property value will be affected; more traffic
and.vehicles entering and leaving the businesses will slow traffic flow; loitering; future
plans changing at the rezoned site over which we will have no control.
Please deny this request for zoning change at 214 and 216 Dix Rd,
fhy u
V ern and Nancy Nesheim
21 1 Dix Rd.
June 14,2007 RECEIVED
Subject: Case No. P07019 Rezoning of 214 216 Dix Road JIM 14 2Dd7
• Dear Council,
DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Wanted to let you know that I am greatly opposed to the rezoning of 214 & 216 Dix Road
addresses from RS-3 to PUD. I feel that sort of change will increase the traffic congestion at
the intersection of Dix & Industrial. And since no reason has been defined why the rezoning
request, it sends a very questionable message. I am a nearby property owner. I do not want
anymore changes that can possibly impact the neighborhood negatively. There has been more
than enough negative changes in the neighborhood within the last 10 yrs. This neighborhood
does not need to take the risk of providing more opportunity. Until clear definition is provided to
the council & neighborhood as to why the rezoning change, the property should remain as
currently zoned.
Sincerely,
Susan Faerber
206 Donald Ave.
Jefferson City, MO 65109
•
•
Tune 1 I. ?007 Em
RE: Rezoning of land
To: .Jefferson City Council
As a resident of.Jefferson City (and one who pays city taxes). I am adamantly opposed to
the potential rezoning of the tract of land at the corner of Dix Road and Industrial Drive.
The amount of traffic that accesses both Dix Road and Industrial Drive is already
excessive and dan-el-OUS, especially to children walking to West Elementary School. I
drive down both Dix Road and Industrial Drive almost every day and the traffic is
already so bad that it is just a matter of time before a major traffic accident happens
and/or a pedestrian is severely injured.
It is already difficult for residents that live in Timberlake Apartments to enter or leave
their parking lot. To enter and leave UMB bank is already difficult and large eighteen
wheel trucks across the street at DeLong's is already a major accident waiting to occur.
The rezoning of land will only make it much more dangerous for drivers and students and
I hope the ,Jefferson City Council members will make a prudent decision not to rezone the
tract of land at the corner of Dix Road and Industrial Drive.
Sincerely,
c
AI Collier
609 Norris Drive
•
1
Petition
This petition is to be presented to the City of Jefferson in opposition
to the rezoning case P07019 changing the status of 214 and 216 Dix
Road from Residential RS-3 to a Planed Unit Development PUD.
Case No. P07019 — 214 and 216 Dix Road; Rezoning, Comprehensive Plan
Amendment, and Concept PUD Plan. Request filed by Fred and Dorthy Werdehausen
and Bryan and Monda Werdehausen, property owners, to rezone approximately 0.67
acres from RS-3 Medium Density Residential to PUD Planned Unit Development, an
associated comprehensive plan amendment, and a concept PUD plan. The property is
located on the northwest corner of the intersection of Industrial Drive and Dix Road and
is described as part of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 2,
Township 44 North, Range 12 West. (Central Missouri Professional Services,
Consultant)
Signatures Against Rezoning 214 and 21.6 Dix Road
Signature Printed Name Address Date
L �o P r s as Dix o�7
lellf U4 n ) %0
k f,4x 4,e wu - x L'd (- Y--07
/� Jo j6� //4, Qoi-ld A� G� ;- Za-11�
71 0
P �: „�i� 7
,,� u L �7
G'% 1�
�- l•c , y Z/c(��-r 4/� �9 v c �r�f Z V I)-7
V4 15 Oo Q �- 7
i
u3 C iz�C 7
• 9 /
DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY BEVELOPMENT
Petition
This petition is to be presented to the City of Jefferson in opposition
to the rezoning case P07019 changing the status of 214 and 216 Dix
Road from Residential RS-3 to a Planed Unit Development PUD.
Case No. P07019 — 214 and 216 Dix Road; Rezoning, Comprehensive Plan
Amendment, and'Concept PUD Plan. Request filed by Fred and Dorthy Werdehausen
and Bryan and Monda Werdehausen, property owners, to rezone approximately 0.67
acres from RS-3 Medium Density Residential to PUD Planned Unit Development, an
associated comprehensive plan amendment, and a concept PUD plan. The property is
located on the northwest corner of the intersection of Industrial Drive and Dix Road and
is described as part of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 2,
Township 44 North, Range 12 West. (Central Missouri Professional Services,
Consultant)
Signatures Against Rezoning 214 and 216 Dix Road
ianature Printed Name Address Date
v c G -41
I (✓i. C� �"C�c o D y i r<<. C ' 7k(J c
`VV\."-5 ZD Pt
Z01
cc 113
.
..
6
DEPI74LDi VEI
Y DEVELOPMENT
Petition
This petition is to be presented to the City of Jefferson in opposition
to the rezoning case P07019 changing the status of 214 and 216 Dix
Road from Residential RS-3 to a Planed Unit Development PUD.
Case No. P07019 — 214 and 216 Dix Road; Rezoning, Comprehensive Plan
Amendment, and Concept PUD Plan. Request filed by Fred and Dorthy Werdehausen
and Bryan and Monda Werdehausen, property owners, to rezone approximately 0.67
acres from RS-3 Medium Density Residential to PUD Planned Unit Development, an
associated comprehensive plan amendment, and a concept PUD plan. The property is
located on the northwest corner of the intersection of Industrial Drive and Dix Road and
is described as part of the Southeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 2,
Township 44 North, Range 12 West. (Central Missouri Professional Services,
Consultant)
Signatures Against Rezoning 214 and 216 Dix Road
Signature Printed Name Address Date
o
U7
�Iac
�i;_ts4 a
4Z
rnDEPARTMi_FT OF
Jute 12, 2007 RECEIVED
Department of Community Development/Planning Division JUN 14 2007
Jolin G. Christy Municipal Building
320 E. McCarty Street COMMUNITY efferson City, MO 65101
efferson City Planning and Zoning Commission,
As a concerned citizen and property owners, we are against rezoning 214 and 216 Dix Road in Case No
P07019 from RS-3 Single Family Residential to a Planned Unit Development PUD or to any other status.
We believe that this rezoning would be detrimental to the neighborhood as a whole. This was up held two
years ago by the Jefferson City Planning and Zoning Commission by the rejection of a similar-PUD attempt
and maintaining the RS-3 status. As a PUD, it leaves unanswered questions like who will own it or lease it
and the turnover of how many businesses over the next few years. There is frequent business turn over rates
and some empty commercial buildings in the already well defined commercial zones near-by. The possihle
listed commercial uses may still be many, may not seem appropriate and the proposed building is a two story
building of approximately 8,500 square feet, which is even larger than the last attempt at 6,320 square foot.
The current filed plan, which was vague, didn't seem to address trash or deliveries. It has little parking with
the proposed spaces. What about increased water runoff, line of sight and green space. If allowed what about
corner improvements for right turns similar to the diagonal corner since it is less than a 90 degree corner. It
Shouldn't use the schools parking or lot for crossing and if a business is allowed to locate then probably the
school shouldn't use its lot for crossing. This does affect the public school system.
Again this would change the original separation of residential and commercial boundaries that the city set, set
for good reasons and upheld two years ago. The neighborhood will have little or no say as to the business(es)
that would be pennitted to operate. It will increase rezoning attempts in the area. It will detrimentally affect
'Nect perty values of the neighborhood residences. It will create a potential for higher traffic flows or impede
frc at an already busy intersection. It will create a potential for loitering and a higher crime rate. It will
the Educational Center and West School, our neighborhood schools. There are many children in the
area that attend and walk to school. These are a few of my concerns associated with this rezoning attempt in
our family oriented neighborhood.
We also believe that the neighborhood complexion has changed. It is closer knit. It has had new families
with children move into the neighborhood, new investments in additions and maintenance have been made to
many of the area homes and the school has always been an integral part of the neighborhood. Three area
rental properties on Dix Road within 185 feet of the rezoning attempt have been reverted to homeowner
:VI—Ied properties wildhin the last three years. Nothing dramatic has really changed except for revitalization.
This neighborhood is not just well built houses; it's made up of families. You can tell that those families take
pride in their neighborhood and homes. It shows by their investment on additions and maintenance to those
homes and yards. With good neighbors that look out for each other and with a good school, families tend to
stay. The neighborhood families are in it for the long haul. So who's best to have the say in the destiny of
our neighborhood but those families that live in the neighborhood.
I hope that the commission will look at the issue and protect the RS-3 Single Family Residential status of 214
and 216 Dix Road as well as the neighborhood. Thank you.
Sincerely;
*ix ader and Leonard Vader
Road
Jefferson City, MO 65109
Janice McMillan/JeffCity To rengelby @mchsi.com
06/11/2007 08:01 AM cc Eric Barron/JeffCity @JeffCity,Anne
• Stratman/JeffCity @JeffCity
bcc
Subject Re:Rezoning Issue on Dix Road[
Thank you for our comments. Your email will be copied for the Planning and Zoning Commission and
Y Y P 9 9
distributed to them on Thursday evening prior to the meeting.
Janice McMillan, AICP
Deputy Director, Department of Community Development
Planning & Transportation Services
City of Jefferson - 320 East McCarty
Jefferson City, Missouri 65101
E-mail jmcmillan @jeffcitymo.org
Voice: 573.634.6424
Fax: 573.634.6457
rengelby @mchsi.com
/ rengelby @mchsi.com
06/10/2007 08:14 AM To jcplanning @jeffcitymo.org
cc
L
Subject Rezoning Issue on Dix Road
My name is Roger Engelby. My wife Jerry, and I have lived at 209 Dix Road for
over 40 years. We are
very much against rezoning 214 and 216 Dix Road to commercial office. Most
houses in the 200 block
of Dix Road are occupied by the owners and are well--kept. Respect should be
given for people who
have bought here understanding that it is a residential area.
I am disappointed that this issue of rezoning has come up again so quickly.
We just fought this a short
time ago.
I am sure the property at 216 Dix Road is in need of much repair and the
present owners would much
rather have it rezone to commercial. or simply have the home removed then do
repairs and sell it as a
residence.
Please keep the block residential. The owners of 216 Dix Road simply want an
extra dollar at the
expense of us. who live here year in and year out.
I would certainly be at the meeting June 14th but we are on vacation 1200
miles away.
Thank you for your consideration on my behalf.
Roger Engelby
jl:l`
.Lune S, 2007
Dear Department of Community Development,
W
This letter is meant to notify the Department of the concerns that we have in
regard to the rezoning of 214 and 2116 on Dix Rd. , Case. No. Po7019. Our
concerns are:
• It would change the city's original stated residential boundaries,
V-vl-lich was reaffirmed two years ago
• It will open up the door for more rezoning attempts in the area
• It affect the EER Center and West School and its mission as
a neighborhood school
• It will affect my property value
• It will create a potential for a much higher traffic flow and
congestion at an already extremely busy intersection
• It will create a potential for loitering and a higher crime rate
• The neighborhood will have no say as to what businesses will go
in on the property
• There are concerns for water run off
We wish to keep Dix Rd. as a residential area and neighborhood.
Sincerely,
Your neighbors at 206 Dix Rd.
W
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
• After June 14, 2007
214 and 216 Dix Road
Sender Senders How Date
Address Received Received
Douglas & Carolyn Smentkowski 103.Donald-Avenue Email 6/25/2007
•
Janice To "Smentkowski, Doug"<Doug.Smentkowski@oa.
McMillan/JeffCjty cc Phyllis Powell/JeffCity @JeffCity
p. 06/25/2007 08:34 AM bcc Anne Stratman/JeffCity
Subject Re: Possible re-zoning in my neighborhood case
Thank for for your email. It will be forwarded to the City Council.
Janice McMillan, AICP
Deputy Director, Department of Community Development
Planning & Transportation Services
City of Jefferson- 320 East McCarty
Jefferson City, Missouri 65101
E-mail jmcmillan @jeffcitymo.org
Voice: 573.634.6424
Fax: 573.634.6457
"Smentkowski, Doug" <Doug.Smentkowski@oa.mo.gov>
"Smentkowski,
Doug" To <jcplanning @jeffcitymo.org>
<Doug.Smentk
owski @oa.mo. cc
gov> Subject Possible re-zoning in my neighborhood case: P07019
06/23/2007
09:11 PM
Planning--City of Jefferson City
My Wife Carolyn (Connie)and I, Douglas Smentkowski objects to the
change in our family neighborhood from RS-3 Single Family Residential
to a PUD Planned Unit Development. We understand that are other PUD
locations in Jefferson City but the property may cost more than these two
single family residents. That is the investor's problem and they should
not be allowed to run our neighborhood down for their profit.
We will attend the Public hearing on July 16, 2007 and request to speak
against this P07019 at 214 and 216 Dix Road.
Douglas & Carolyn Smentkowski
103 Donald Ave
Jefferson City, Mo 65109-0943
751-1623 Work
636-0419 Home
C: Brian Crane
Jane Smith
Rich Koon
Jim Penfold
PLANNING STAFF REPORT
JEFFERSON CITY PLANNING AND ZONING CONIMSSION
June 14, 2007
Case No.P07019—214 and 216 Dix Road;Rezoning,Comprehensive Plan Amendment,and Concept PUD
Plan. Request filed by Fred and Dorthy Werdehausen and Bryan and Monda Werdehausen,property owners, to
rezone approximately 0.67 acres from RS-3 Medium Density Residential to PUD Planned Unit Development,an
associated comprehensive plan amendment, and a concept PUD plan. The property is located on the northwest
corner of the intersection of Industrial Drive and Dix Road and is described as part of the Southeast quarter of the
Southeast quarter of Section 2, Township 44 North, Range 12 West. (Central Missouri Professional Services,
Consultant)
Notification
By publication in the newspaper, by letter to adjacent and affected property owners within 185 feet, and by
posting a sign on the property.
Nature of Request
The applicant is requesting the following:
1. A Comprehensive Plan Amendment changing the designation of the property from low density
residential to commercial on the development plan map of the comprehensive plan.
2. A request to rezone the property from RS-3 to PUD with an underlying zoning district of C-O.
3. A concept PUD plan for a 2 story office building with a total floor area of 8,580 square feet and 29
parking spaces.
Location
The subject property is located on the northwestern corner of the intersection of Dix Road and Industrial Drive.
Access/Traffic
Current access to the property is off of Dix Road via an existing driveway. A secondary access from Industrial
drive exists across the School District property to the west. The school district holds an easement across the
property in order to access Dix Road.
Staff Analvsis
Permitted Uses. The applicant is proposing an underlying zoning of C-0 Office Commercial.
Concept Plan
The concept PUD plan proposes a two story brick office building(single story with a walk-out basement). The
office building is shown with a 25' setback from Dix Road and 15' setback from the Industrial Drive/railroad
right-of-way. The office building is shown with a total floor area of 8580 square feet and a floor area ratio of
34%. A total of 29 parking spaces are shown on the plan with two handicapped parking stalls. The plan
shows that the driveway access to Dix road would be reconstructed in approximately the same location. A type
B bufferyard with a width of 10' is indicated along the northern property line(adjacent to the existing single
family house) but no details regarding the bufferyard are shown. Slmage details are indicated as a small
monument sign and signage on the building in conformance with the City's sign ordinance but no other details
are given. No details regarding outdoor lighting, parking lot landscaping, or trash disposal locations are
shown.
. Staff Recommendation
1. Staff supports the amendment to the development plan map of the comprehensive plan from low
density residential to commercial.
Planning and Zoning Conunission June 14, 2007
Case No. P07019 Page 2
2. Staff supports rezoning the site from RS-3 to PUD with an underlying zoning district of C-0 Office
Cornmercial.PUD zoning would subject redevelopment to review regarding location and design of the
• building and other site improvements and would authorize approval of specific intensity and land uses.
Staff support is subject to: (1) the Floor Area Ratio not to exceed .34 (8,600 sq. ft.) and(2) that the
following uses be excluded from the list of allowed uses: (a)medical or dental offices or clinics and
(b) drive-through uses and facilities. An office for an individual doctor or dentist would be allowed.
3. Staff supports the Concept PUD Plan subject to Engineering Division approval of the access drive on
Dix Road and the adequacy of a 15' setback on the southern property line.
•
I
Jefferson City
Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting
Engineering Division Staff Report
Thursday, June 14, 2007, 5:15pm
Item 6. New Business - Public Hearings
Case No. P07019 - Concept Site Plan, 214, 216 Dix Road (Existing RS-3, Proposed PUD)
ENGINEERING STAFF RECOMMENDATION-
Support approval, subject to all Engineering Staff technical comments being addressed with a future
site plan.
Infrastructure Summary
* Infrastructure is proposed to serve the subdivision, including streets, sidewalk, storm sewer,
lighting, utilities and sanitary sewer.
Site Plan Summary
Storm Water/Erosion Control
• A grading, storm water and erosion control plan will be needed if this request is approved.
Sanitary Sewer
* The proposed development is served by sanitary sewer.
Sidewalk
* Sidewalk is existing along Dix Road. No sidewalk exists along Industrial Drive.
Street Access /Traffic Impact
* Dix Road and Industrial Drive are both considered minor arterial roadways.
Access to the proposed site will be from the same Iocation on Dix Road and from the driveway to
the adjacent property to the west, on Industrial Drive. Site distance is acceptable for both access
points.
* The existing residential driveway on Dix Road close to the intersection is to be removed.
* The speed limit for Industrial Drive is 40 mph west and 35 mph east of Dix Road. The speed
limit for Dix Road is 30 mph.
• Industrial Drive is a four(4) lane street with no center turn lane, no parking allowed. Dix Road
is a two (2) street with no center turn lane, with parking allowed only on the west side of the
street.
Fire Hvdrants/Street Lights * Facilities are existing in the vicinity.