Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout10/04/05 CCM303 MEDINA CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 4, 2005 The City Council of Medina, Minnesota met in regular session on October 4, 2005 at 7:00 p.m. in the Hamel Community Building, 3200 Mill Drive. Acting Mayor Smith presided. I. ROLL CALL Members present: Brinkman, Cavanaugh, Smith, Weir, and Workman (8:55 p.m.) Members absent: None. Also present: City Attorney Ron Batty, City Engineer Tom Kellogg, Public Works Director Jim Dillman, Police Chief Ed Belland, City Planner Rose Lorsung, City Planner Consultant Sarah Schield, City Administrator Chad Adams and Recording Secretary Cheryl Felix. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA Cavanaugh requested an addition to New Business, Item E, Ryan Companies Land Alteration Permit. Adams requested an addition to City Administrator Report, Item B, closing City Hall October 14 in preparation for renovations. Moved by Weir, seconded by Cavanaugh, to approve the agenda as amended. Motion passed unanimously. IV. PRESENTATION Wayzata High School National Honor Society — Proposal for Hunter Lions Park. There was no one present. V. APPROVAL A. Approval of the September 20, 2005 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes It was noted on page 2, the 7th paragraph, it should state: "Brinkman... is 25% 29%...." It was noted on page 2, the 8th paragraph, it should state: "If an applicant...a complement complaint with the soils overlay, it he...." Moved by Weir, seconded by Cavanaugh, to approve the September 20, 2005 regular City Council meeting minutes as amended. Motion passed unanimously. VI. CONSENT AGENDA A. Resolution Designating National Incident Management System (NIMS) as the Basis for All Incident Management in Medina, Minnesota B. Acceptance of 54,175 in Donations for Medina Preservation Day Medina City Council Meeting Minutes October 4, 2005 304 C. Approve Job Description for Finance Director/Assistant City Administrator Position and Authorize Staff to Post an Advertisement for Hiring D. Acceptance of 2006 Proposed Lake Minnetonka Communications Commission Budget E. Accept Resignation of Park Commissioner Jeff Evanson Moved by Weir, seconded by Cavanaugh, to approve the consent agenda. Motion passed unanimously. VII. COMMENTS A. Comments from Citizens on Items not on the Agenda There were none. B. Park Commission Dillman noted at their last meeting one member was missing but had resigned. He added on October 16 from 8:30 to noon volunteers are wanted for the 4th annual Buckthorn Removal Party in Uptown Hamel. C. Planning Commission Lorsung stated the October meeting includes the Dairy Queen redevelopment site plan and discussion of the sign ordinance. She added a couple of applications were incomplete and will be on the November agenda. Mr. Hopper's County Road 24 variance request has been pulled permanently because he is looking for a CUP instead The City received two submittals regarding the proposed Uptown Hamel entry sign, which they will review. VII. OLD BUSINESS There was none. VIII. NEW BUSINESS A. Resolution Authorizing Variance Extension at 4629 Brook Street — Public Hearing Lorsung stated the applicant is requesting a variance extension. The City received one letter stating she is in favor of the extension due to the property being in poor condition She added staff is recommending approval of a one-year extension for the variances that were previously granted. Smith opened the public hearing at 7:09 p.m. Janet White, 4642 Brook Street, asked the intentions of the property owners in this ne year. She added she has seen very little improvement this past year. Joe Ahlstrom, 4629 Brook Street, stated the variance was received towards the end of November and construction in winter is not good. His job took him out of town this summer. He added there are plans to start, hopefully before November; otherwise the will wait until spring. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes October 4, 2005 305 Smith closed the public hearing at 7:12 p.m. Weir asked how often the City renews variances. She added with seasonal changes she could see extending the request for a year. Lorsung replied the applicant could request one with any type of time frame and Council has the authority to decide. Cavanaugh stated he would not want to see improvements extend beyond this next extension; he is unsure he would grant another. Moved by Weir, seconded by Cavanaugh, to approve the resolution authorizing a variance extension at 4629 Brook Street. Motion passed unanimously. B. Award Contract for City Hall Improvements Maureen Bellows, project architect, stated there was a total of eight bids. A call was received from G.A. Construction noting they had made a mathematical error, had inadvertently left out one item, and requested their bid be removed. Proof was asked for and provided; therefore, this bid was removed from consideration. She suggested acceptance of alternate one and two and suggested bid bond also be retained for the second low bidder because if the low bidder, McFarland Construction, is unable to sign the contract, the second low bidder, American Liberty Construction, would be considered. Cavanaugh asked under what circumstances a bidder would not sign a contract. He also asked what the bid bond is. Bellows replied the bidder could choose to withdraw or there could be a schedule conflict. Batty replied the bid bond is five percent. Cavanaugh asked if the contract is awarded to the second lowest bidder does the City keep the bid bond from the first. Batty replied yes, if they fail to enter into a contract. He added he does not anticipate this, but this procedure is done routinely with projects such as this. He added bidders are not normally allowed to retract their bids, but G.A. Construction proved they made errors; they are also not allowed to amend their bid. Cavanaugh asked how the company names are chosen and how does a company qualify. He also asked about quality and dollar satisfaction. Bellows replied they advertise for bids several ways; companies may pick up drawings at City Hall then present their bid. She added they are satisfied with the quality and dollars; many contractors were spoken to and most visited the site more than once. Adams stated that furnishings and equipment are not included in the contract, but with those expenses they are within the total budget of $225,000 to $235,000. Moved by Weir, seconded by Brinkman, to award the contract for City Hall improvements to McFarland Construction with American Liberty Construction as the alternate. Motion passed unanimously. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes October 4, 2005 306 C. Interim Ordinance (Moratorium) Discussion Adams stated Staff is looking for policy direction whether to execute a moratorium and, if so, where the moratorium should be located, what are the issues to be studying, what the time frame of the moratorium should be, and who should the moratorium affect in regards to existing applications. Batty referenced the memorandum provided to Council. He stated a moratorium is when Council comes to the conclusion there is a deficiency in an ordinance and if not remedied would be challenged. Staff needs an indication if Council is interested in one. A time limit needs to be established, which can be extended for short periods of time under certain circumstances, with a maximum of one year. A decision has to be made as to whether it would go into effect immediately and cover all applications or cover applications after the effective date. He added it can be adopted without Planning Commission review or a public hearing. Smith asked if there is an interest in a moratorium. Cavanaugh stated it depends; the heart of Medina needs to be protected and people should be given benefits such as additional building rights for conforming to open space preservation. He added he does not think it is fair to place the moratorium on applications already submitted. Weir stated she is interested; the comp plan is not in sync with subdivisions in the rural area. She added the timeline should be six months to accomplish and should only cover subdivisions in the rural residential zone. Brinkman stated the City has some extraordinary circumstances and starting today all applications need to be included. He added the rural residential should be covered with a timeline of six months. Lorsung noted the rural residential area encompasses about 65% of land in the City. Smith asked if it is appropriate to have a moratorium on dividable lots. Batty replied yes. Cavanaugh asked whether it applies to all or new applications. Smith asked if it is legal to do with submitted applications. Batty replied the statute states a moratorium cannot be imposed on a property that has received preliminary approvals. Everything else is subject to the moratorium. Lorsung stated there are three applications pending. Brinkman stated it is not wise to have something take place in the face of a pending issue. He added the moratorium should be for the shortest time period possible. Weir stated she agrees; if the City requires an innovative design from a developer they might reward that developer with an extra unit. She noted she could then support applying it to current applications. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes October 4, 2005 307 Brinkman agreed stating allowing a developer one more unit, if it would be a better looking development, would be sensible to consider, but hard to do until defined. Cavanaugh stated including current applications is not fair since they have already spent time and money. He added the most significant criteria consistently used, among others, were five contiguous acres and if a developer goes through the process and has fit those criteria they need approval or non -approval, not a rule change at this point. Smith suggested lots where length cannot be longer than width is included. She added the moratorium should be on all rural residential subdividable lots. Weir suggested if there are four houses on the site the developer could have two to the front and two set back. She stated the moratorium should only apply to subdivisions. She added the intent is to make sure the rural residential area ordinance matches what the vision statement in the comprehensive plan wishes to achieve. She suggested width setback be looked at as well as rewarding a developer who will consider a different design that helps preserve the rural nature. Smith stated if setbacks are not working they should be changed. Brinkman stated the ordinance must match the vision statement. He suggested the shape and size of lots be reviewed. Smith suggested the timeline be six months. Adams replied that six months would be difficult for staff to meet because there are a number of current projects happening now, as well as several variables involving the study of this moratorium area, with two being open space planning and the comprehensive plan review. Batty suggested since the timeline is difficult to extend, that the maximum of one year be approved. He noted Council needs to direct Staff to study changes to the ordinance for general applications, not to impede a certain project. Lorsung reminded Council that once the Metropolitan Council vision for Medina is reviewed, if that plan is adopted and effects subdivisions, the ordinance would need to be changed. Smith replied her concern is if they wait two years the City may not have a rural residential area. Lorsung stated suitable soils requirements frame the lot. Smith replied amendments could be made to meet other requirements. Moved by Cavanaugh, seconded by Weir, to impose a moratorium on the rural residential area, specifically subdivisions, excluding applications already submitted, with a timeline of one year. Schield asked if the exclusion applies to complete or incomplete applications. Weir replied if the application has been submitted to the Planning Commission it should not be considered. Lorsung stated there are two or three applications coming in within the next 60 days. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes October 4, 2005 308 Brinkman stated if they do not do a clean sweep now they might miss an opportunity to apply restrictions, which is not wise. He suggested a shorter time frame. Weir stated she is not comfortable with posing a year on applicants. Smith stated a year is necessary. She noted it does not matter if a developer has submitted a plan; the area needs to be preserved, and it is only three applications. Cavanaugh asked if it is setting precedence. Brinkman replied no, fixing an incorrect thing. He added communities have been through this before and Medina needs to catclj it now and keep the area on track as intended. Cavanaugh stated a year is a long time. He asked about deadlines for the three applications. He suggested Staff work with the developers on these now. Lorsung replied they all have deadlines. She noted one has preliminary plat approval on November 9, one on December 31, and one is incomplete so has no date. She added to meet the November 9 deadline, Staff would need approval/denial at the next Council meeting. Brinkman stated Staff should not just pull out the three applications and spend time on these. He added he feels bad for the applicants but feels they are doing the right thing. Smith requested a vote on the motion. Cavanaugh stated he would be interested in Workman's comments. Smith stated she would give people two minutes to speak. She added this issue will come back in two weeks. Holly Leuer, 1522 Medina Road, stated she is shocked Council is considering opposing a subdivision that meets all requirements. The moratorium adoption is being discussed to prevent one development from going forward and that is not legal. To pass a moratorium without a public hearing would affect dozens of property owners, and they have the right to voice their opinions. She added the Council's job is to enforce the law, She requested Council vote no for a moratorium. Jim Lane, 2605 Hamel Road, stated he believes the proposed moratorium should require a published notice and public hearing and, if not, would recommend it. A moratorium should not be taken lightly and without due process. He added City Staff has been aggressive and over reaching in implementing/opposing subdivision requirements in other areas. Michael Leuer, 1522 Medina Road, stated he is a developer in the City and people rely on zoning and guidance which is Council's job to uphold. He asked how there can be an ordinance change without a meeting and a public hearing, noting Planning Commission as well as residents should be involved. He asked if Council is trying to cram in a moratorium to stop one development. He suggested Council remember their duty. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes October 4, 2005 309 Smith asked if the incomplete application is included in the motion. Cavanaugh replied he would include it based on the rules that were in place when it was submitted. Adams requested clarification on the motion, whether it includes just the three submitted applications or any applications submitted before the moratorium is approved. Cavanaugh replied the three applications already submitted. Batty stated Council should decide whether or not to include submitted applications upon the moratorium effective date, not by a specific application. He noted Council is adopting a motion to direct Staff to prepare an ordinance with indicated outlines. Cavanaugh replied applications in and complete as of today. Adams stated the defining date should be the document acceptance date. Cavanaugh replied he agrees. Motion Failed. 1-3 (Cavanaugh — aye; Weir, Brinkman, Smith — nay). Moved by Brinkman, seconded by Weir, to direct Staff to prepare an ordinance to consider a moratorium on the rural residential area, to prohibit subdivisions, including applications already submitted, with a timeline of one year. Cavanaugh stated this would require submitted applications to be put off for a year after initial requirements have been met. He added he would not vote in favor of this. Mark Metzger, 4065 Shorewood Trail, stated he read the agenda on the City's website. He stated if somebody is in complete compliance with the rules it sounds like they are being punished. Motion Passed. 3-1 (Weir, Brinkman, Smith — aye; Cavanaugh — nay). Batty stated there is no requirement for a public hearing; therefore, Council can give as little or as much notice as they want. Smith stated Council has always allowed public comment. Adams replied they can publish for a hearing in next week's newspaper and/or send notices by mail to residents in the rural residential area. Lorsung suggested notices be sent to all subdividable properties within this area. Cavanaugh recommended notices be sent to everyone in the rural residential area because it affects their neighborhood. Adams clarified the direction to Staff, which is to send out a postcard to everyone in the rural residential area and to publish for a public hearing. Smith requested City reply to the letter they received today via email and have City Attorney respond. Batty noted it was received yesterday. Smith recessed the meeting at 8:50 p.m. Workman presided and reconvened the meeting at 8:55 p.m. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes October 4, 2005 310 D. Preliminary Plat, Rezoning to PUD-UC, PUD General Plan, Vacation of Phase 1 Easement, CUP Withdrawal for Ace Properties Phase II Located at 5065 CSAH 101 Lorsung stated Ace Properties has applied for a preliminary plat, rezoning to PUD-UC, PUD general plan, vacation of easements, and CUP withdrawal for the property located at 5065 CSAH 101. The request has gone through several revisions. Ryan Companies and Ace are working together to utilize a parcel designated for parking. She reviewed several issues including traffic flow, the design of the building, signage, and tree mitigation. Workman stated this is a gateway project to the Ryan project. He noted concerns with the proposed drive-thru regarding traffic. He added a nicer facade on the eastern side of the building would enhance the development. Brinkman replied they could add trees on the east side, which would not be covering up anything such as signs. Smith asked how parking flows. Lorsung replied the traffic engineer had a concern regarding larger vehicles needing to get through. She added there is an opportunity with construction of the right-of-way; there is a left over City parcel created with the development, whereby, Staff could direct the developer to mitigate trees. She also added there is a location on the county right-of-way that can be dressed up because it will no longer be a storm pond. Smith asked why there are no trees on the right-of-way. Lorsung replied there are trees on both sides of Clydesdale. She added it is not part of this project. Weir asked if some trees could be extended to the county right-of-way. Lorsung replied yes, it could be landscaped. Workman asked about the land being graded flat between Ace Properties and 101. He also asked if phase II is at a lower elevation. Lorsung replied the retaining wall would be moved. She added phase II is lower by five to six feet. Weir asked about the luminaries noting a concern that they will shine into the neighbor's yards. Lorsung stated the right-of-way does not interfere with the parking lot luminaries. Smith asked if there was a zero setback at the lot line. Lorsung stated yes, they need to meet lighting standards and make sure it is not a really well lit development. Weir asked if all buildings are required to have all-around architecture. Workman asked if there was outside receptacles for trash. Lorsung replied yes. Smith asked why the trash is not kept inside. Workman replied tenants would not like to haul their trash all that way to the receptacle. Weir stated the trash enclosure is taking up two parking spaces and is opposite the housing. Lorsung replied it is the first thing you see entering the drive-thru area and if you are traveling on Clydesdale; therefore, it does not meet the requirements. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes October 4, 2005 311 Cavanaugh stated the sides of the building should be dressed up because that is the entrance of the City. He added Target has to meet these same standards. Steve Oliver, Architectural Group for Ace Properties, stated he appreciates Council's comments and noted building costs need to be considered. Phase II is an upgrade from Phase I in terms of exterior items such as brick. Landscaping, such as trees, could be added to the east side and the back side could be upgraded with fencing or a trellis as well as other landscaping elements. Workman noted a third of the building is at a higher elevation and it would be nice to balance out both sides. Oliver replied it is a personal preference; the south side was treated differently than the north. Smith stated there should be something on the east side that makes it look like not part of the back of a building. Oliver replied it will be reviewed and ideas brought back. Oliver stated regarding the drive-thru issue, the amount of stacking is typical and the site is tight, that is why the trash enclosures are not in the building. This allows trash vehicles to make a loop like everyone else. The trash enclosures have the same type of exterior as the building. Workman replied they do not want enclosures outside like that. Larry Palm, Ace, stated all finances revolve around the site. He noted Council keeps squeezing but they cannot push much more. He added they had to write a check to Ryan Companies for $150,000 and at some point the bleeding needs to stop. Workman replied he understands, but Council needs to look at where the City is going long term. Brinkman stated there is latitude regarding traffic and the trash enclosure. He noted the trash trucks would stop drive-thru traffic. Workman stated they have no problem giving extra square footage if they want to put the trash in the building. He added they are trying to negotiate the best project they can. Palm replied they have been through several, several revisions. Smith stated she does not understand why each tenant cannot use 96-gallon carts for garbage. She added this might be more convenient than walking through traffic to dump garbage. Cavanaugh stated he does not see the point of enclosed garbage and would be comfortable with it outside if it had a nice surround. He added the designated spot is mostly hidden and the least obtrusive. Weir stated the trash enclosure is taking up parking spaces. Lorsung stated if the goal is to hide the trash enclosure it might be better moving it to the left. Workman replied that area is not as easy for trucks to access. Palm replied it could be put on the northwest comer where trucks could drive straight in. Oliver stated if the enclosure were moved to the northwest comer of the lot Target sees a brick structure from their side and they would get two parking stalls back. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes October 4, 2005 312 Cavanaugh asked if the enclosure would block parking stalls. He also asked if there would be a problem for trucks coming in if cars were parked. Oliver replied the enclosure would still take up two stalls. He added trucks would not have a problem because the doors face east. Weir stated from an entrance point of view it would be better on the Target side. Workman stated he would like more space on the drive-thru. He added he does not think it is a good thing to have in a sensitive location; it needs to be a stand-alone. Palm replied on phase I the entrance is one way. Brinkman stated traffic could be an issue and Council did not approve a drive-thru for Ryan. He asked when drive-thrus are primarily used and if there is a traffic count. He also asked if the drive-thru could be restricted or if Ace could live without it. Palm replied the user will make a difference. He added the drive-thru is a big deal; traffic engineers looked at it and approved it. Lorsung stated Staff does not recommend a fast food restaurant. Workman replied fast food trips or coffee shop trips per day is not that much different. He noted the worst time on County Road 101 is from 6:30 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. Brinkman stated the drive-thru should be eliminated; it is very tight. Palm replied land was given up to acquire parking and services to the building. Palm suggested they route Clydesdale across the back as originally planned. Workman replied when people invest money they take risks. Brinkman stated they should get rid of the drive-thru and put the trash inside. Palm replied the trash enclosure was originally configured as attached to the building. Weir asked if the City could give back 100 square feet if Ace takes away the drive-thru. Smith asked where the recycling is. Oliver replied the trash enclosure contains a double container. Workman stated he would rather see them add 10 feet on the north side of the building and add the trash enclosure there. He suggested they build the enclosure like the building with roll up or similar doors. Oliver replied if they add on 10 feet and take away the drive-thru trash would have to be dragged. Cavanaugh stated if the City gives Ace extra space they would be picking up square footage. Palm replied the parking problem would worsen. Workman replied no, if the enclosure was placed on the north side and the drive-thru was removed this would open up two more parking spaces. Oliver stated if all parties agree the drive-thru is gone, the service area in the back could be narrowed. This will increase the width to the boulevard or they can add landscaping. Workman noted lighting concems. Palm replied they will take care of it. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes October 4, 2005 313 0 Workman asked about the timeframe. Lorsung replied the deadline has been extended until December 1. Workman asked when Staff would get new plans. He added there should be one more review session before a resolution. Oliver replied they need a little bit of time. E. Land Alteration Permit — Ryan Companies Dick Koppy, Ryan Companies, handed out site layout information regarding the proposed land alteration. He added the specific fill portion of the site is in the center, filling in a low spot, not a wetland. Brinkman asked how much dirt would be exported and if it would all be dumped on this proposed site. Koppy replied the volume will vary, but approximately 75,000 yards. He added all the dirt would be dumped on this site and graded out. Smith referenced the Planning Commission minutes of February 2005 which indicated Koppy stated the removed dirt would be used to level out other parts on the Ryan site as a net balance. She asked why they now are requesting to move dirt off -site. She also asked about several trucks moving dirt through the City. Koppy replied they had always intended to move dirt. He added plans changed slightly because the Target store now sits a bit lower than originally planned. Workman stated the City has no problem with Ryan doing what they need to with the site, but land alterations to the other property needs to be taken into account, which is that property owner's call. Smith replied she disagrees; it is not just the owner's call. She again questioned how many truckloads of dirt would be going through the streets. Workman stated the trucks will generally go around City streets, noting it is in the submitted plans. He added Staff has not had a chance to review the information since it has just been handed out. Brinkman stated a lot of dirt is being moved. Smith asked why Council is just finding out dirt is being moved. Koppy stated the reason information is brought to Council tonight is because it was realized through discussions with the Watershed District. He added they are hoping to get the Target foundation placed this fall and without a dirt drop-off site available it will be difficult. Cavanaugh asked if there was any reason they cannot move the dirt to another site then to the proposed site, if and when approved. Koppy replied they might have to. Workman asked if, to this day, Staff has received any earthwork calculations. Kellogg replied no. Smith stated she would like to see this back with a plan and the Watershed District comments. Brinkman asked why moving dirt is needed. Koppy replied the store is lower. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes October 4, 2005 314 Smith asked if the store has been lowered since February 2005. Koppy replied no. He added they will bring back an explanation with details; some grades may have changed due to City request, and they may have run into bad soils on some parts of the site. Workman noted Council consensus to continue this item until the next meeting. IX. CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT A. Park Commission Vacancy Adams asked when to advertise for the vacancy, noting the appointment is in January. Workman replied wait until January. He added he would like to review possible all new appointments for both the Park Commission and the Planning commission. Weir stated if one is reviewed the other one should be, too. Workman replied he would consider all new applications to both Commissions. He added the intent is not to eliminate certain people, but to build a consensus with groups of people. Smith stated Commissioners need to understand that being appointed does not mean they can come and go as they please. She added there is trouble with attendance. Workman replied the City needs a cohesive group that feels they have value in what they are doing. He added Council might not be listening to them sometimes; independent bodies need to be independent bodies. Smith stated Commissioners need to be trained on how to have meetings. Adams replied the three bodies had a workshop this spring and will have another one shortly t address these types of concerns. Weir stated she is not sure about dissolving both bodies. She added people are not lining up to be on these Commissions. Cavanaugh suggested Council review what the City of Corcoran did because they did not handle the situation the right way. Workman requested Staff put together a review process and bring back to Council. B. City Hall Closing October 14 Adams stated he is suggesting City Hall be closed to the general public on October 14 in order to remove items from the building for the anticipated renovation. Smith requested the closing be posted to advise residents. Moved by Weir, seconded by Smith, to close City Hall to the general public on October 14, 2005 for renovation preparation. Motion passed unanimously. Adams stated Staff met with the City of Corcoran to discuss City sewer and water extension to their southwest corridor. Adams thanked Staff members and all those involved for their help with Medina Preservation Day. He added letters would be sent to those who donated and/or helpe Medina City Council Meeting Minutes October 4, 2005 315 X. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Weir stated she has been looking at street lighting, noting Wild Meadows is far superior. She added she is not happy with the Vernon because they disburse lots of lighting onto the street. She asked if Council would be interested in looking into cheaper, more superior fixtures. Adams replied Xcel Energy no longer offers the preferred Shepard Hook model, so the City selected the Vernon style. He added the City pays less operating costs for the Vemon because of the Xcel program; however, another option is to look at utility districts (taxing residents) to offset electrical costs the City provides. Smith asked if Council let Ryan put the Vernon light in. Adams replied not yet, because the developer and Council preferred the Shepard Hook design. Lorsung added the City might not want the same standard for every area. Cavanaugh stated at the last planning session different sites for future City facilities were discussed. He added one site talked about earlier was recently sold and is about to expire soon. Workman suggested Staff look at and provide a feasibility report. Adams reminded the Council that the master planning for such future city facilities has been scheduled to begin after the City Hall renovation project is complete; and advised that staffs current workload is significant and advised against starting any earlier. Xl. APPROVAL TO PAY THE BILLS Moved by Weir, seconded by Cavanaugh, to approve the bills, order check numbers 028462-028508 for $657, 664.84, and payroll check numbers 019496-019521 for $27, 319.11. Motion passed unanimously. XII. ADJOURN Moved by Smith, seconded by Cavanaugh, to adjourn the meeting at 10:53 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. 41 ce D. Workman, Mayor Attest: AA 44 74/z„ Chad M. Adams, City Administrator -Clerk Medina City Council Meeting Minutes October 4, 2005 316 THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY Medina City Council Meeting Minutes October 4, 2005 317 ORDER CHECKS - OCTOBER 4, 2005 028462 RES SPECIALTY PYROTECHNICS $4,000.00 028463 ADAMS, CHAD $54.75 028464 ALLEGRA PRINT & IMAGING $329.09 028465 BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK $159,817.30 028466 BRAUN INTERTEC $6,208.60 028467 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS $1,247.30 028468 BUFFALO BITUMINOUS $211.25 028469 CLASSIC CLEANING $399.38 028470 Dl'1"1'hR, INC. $378.19 028471 EHLERS & ASSOC. $2,231.25 028472 ELECTRON HERDERS $55.37 028473 ERICKSON, ROLF ENT., INC $5,435.02 028474 GOETSCH, W.W. ASSOCIATES, INC. $909.51 028475 HALLMAN OIL CO. FUEL DIV. $18,003.00 028476 HAMEL FIRE RELIEF ASSN. $38,606.00 028477 HENNEPIN CO.TREAS.(JAIL SVC.) $652.00 028478 HENRYS WATERWORKS $457.22 028479 HOSTINGMINNESOTA.COM $24.95 028480 KELLY'S WRECKER SERVICE $159.74 028481 KEN'S SNOWPLOWING & BOBCAT $2,000.00 028482 KENNEDY & GRAVEN $31,168.51 028483 LAKE BUSINESS SUPPLY $64.09 028484 LANDFORM $7,942.64 028485 LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES $222.00 028486 LEAGUE OF MN CITIES, FIN. DEPT $3,669.00 028487 LONG LAKE FAMILY PHYSICIANS $122.00 028488 MCFOA $35.00 028489 MEDICA $253.95 028490 MEDICA CHOICE $12,418.25 028491 METROCALL $27.75 028492 NATIONAL WATERWORKS $1,264.88 028493 NELSON ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR $90.00 028494 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS $644.83 028495 QWEST $466.00 028496 RANDY'S SANITATION $118.06 028497 RICE LAKE CONST $350,828.00 028498 STREICHER'S $423.13 028499 STS CONSULTANTS $1,062.60 028500 TRI STATE PUMP&CONTROL $315.00 028501 TRUGREEN CHEMLAWN (OSSEO) $2,613.54 028502 TWIN CITY WATER CLINIC $45.00 028503 UNION SECURITY INS. CO. $435.35 028504 VALVOLINE FLEET SERVICES $138.48 028505 VIEAU, CEC $40.53 028506 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT $138.50 028507 WRIGHT-HENNEPIN ELECTRIC $1,654.35 028508 XCEL ENERGY $283.48 $657,664.84 318 PAYROLL CHECKS - OCTOBER 3, 2005 019496 WORKMAN, BRUCE $207.79 019497 SMITH, CAROLYN A. $138.52 019498 BRINKMAN, RANDY $138.52 019499 ADAMS, CHAD M. $1,922.44 019500 SCHERER, STEVEN T. $1,219.72 019501 MCGILL, CHRISTOPHER R. $1,470.39 019502 HALL, DAVID M. $1,431.55 019503 DILLMAN, JAMES D $1,839.05 019504 DRESSEL, ROBERT P. $1,120.90 019505 BELLAND, EDGAR J $2,231.89 019506 CONVERSE, KEITH A $1,299.27 019507 VIEAU, CECILIA M $1,028.73 019508 DINGMANN, IVAN W $1,183.06 019509 SULANDER, LAURA L. $1,186.65 019510 LARSON, SANDRA L $1,232.31 019511 BOECKER, KEVIN D $1,439.15 019512 CAVANAUGH, JOSEPH $138.52 019513 WEIR, ELIZABETH V. $138.52 019514 GREGORY, THOMAS $1,513.16 019515 LORSUNG, ROSE A $1,171.59 019516 NELSON, JASON $1,673.14 019517 THUL, JEFFREY P. $1,300.38 019518 KLISZCZ, DAVID A. $469.81 019519 VINCK, JOHN J. $1,086.59 019520 FINKE, DUSTIN D. $282.82 019521 MAROHNIC, NICHOLAS $454.64 $27,319.11