HomeMy Public PortalAbout2020-09-15 packetNOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING AND TENTATIVE AGENDA'
City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission
Tuesday, September 15, 2020 – 6:00 p.m.
Virtual Meeting—WebEx
hILtps://jeffersonci!y.webex.com/jeffersoncity/
j.php?MTID=m94cd90464f3 82ab8b285 f44284fb3 84c
Join by Phone --+14043971516 US Toll
Access code-- 146 319 8982
Password-- 1234
TENTATIVE AGENDA
1. Introductions and Roll Call
2. Procedural Matters
a. Determination of quorum
3. Adoption of Agenda (as printed or reordered)
4. Approval of August 11, 2020 Regular Meeting Minutes
5. Approval of August 26, 2020 Special Meeting Minutes
6. Communications Received
7. New Business
a. 619-623 E. Capitol Mural
8. Other Business
a. Code Change – Update
b. SmartGov
9. Dates to Remember
a. Next Regular Meeting Date, October 13, 2020
10. Adjournment
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as
required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request.
Please call 573-634-6410 for information regarding agenda items
City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
Regular Meeting — Tuesday, August 11, 2020
Council Chambers — John G. Christy Municipal Building
320 E. McCarty Street
Commission Members Present
Mary Schantz, Chairperson
Gregory Bemboom
Alan Wheat
Michael Berendzen
Tiffany Patterson
Brad Schaefer
Steven Hoffman
Commission Members Absent
Donna Deetz, Vice Chairperson
Gail Jones
Council Liaison Present
Laura Ward, Via Telephone
Staff Present
Rachel Senzee, Neighborhood Services Supervisor
Anne Stratman, Neighborhood Services Specialist
Bryan Wolford, Associate City Attorney
Guests Present
John Dinkins
Alan Strope
Bryan Wolford
Fr. Richard Frank
Gary & Doris Schmutzler
Jeff Futhey
Pete Oetting
Herbert Turner
Attendance Record
6 of 7
6 of 7
6 of 7
4of7
3 of 4
6 of 7
6 of 7
Attendance Record
6 of 7
5 of 7
Stephen Meyer
Wayne Elliott
Call to Order
Ms. Schantz called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
Adoption of Agenda
Ms. Patterson moved and Mr. Wheat seconded to adopt the agenda as printed. The motion passed
unanimously.
Approval of Minutes
Mr. Wheat moved and Mr. Berendzen seconded to approve the minutes from the July 14, 2020
Regular Meeting as written. The motion passed unanimously.
Communication Received
Ms. Senzee explained that correspondence was received from EBI Consulting pertaining to an
invitation to comment on a proposed telecommunications facility installation at 909 Louisiana Avenue.
Since it is associated with the FCC they are required to go through the Section 106 Review process. The
proposed tower does not lie within any of the National Register Districts or local landmark areas. The
Commission has the ability to choose whether to comment or not. Staff recommendation would be to
send a notice saying that we decline comment at this time.
After additional discussion, the Commission chose to reserve comment on the proposed
telecommunications facility.
Demolition Review -Under 100 Years Old
A. 1560 Bald Hill Road
Ms. Senzee explained that 1560 Bald Hill Road is under consideration for demolition review. This
property is owned by Christopher Billings. The current structure is being demolished to rebuild on the lot.
This property does not hold stand-alone historical significance in terms of heritage, cultural or
architecturally. Staff recommendation for this property is demolition.
The Commission discussed contacting the Historic City of Jefferson each time a property comes
before them for demolition. This will allow the Historic City of Jefferson to determine whether there are
any architectural items that are salvageable from that home.
Ms. Senzee stated that she will contact the Historic City of Jefferson each time so that they can make
that determination whether or not to salvage items.
Mr. Bemboom moved and Mr. Berendzen seconded to approve the demolition review application for
1560 Bald Hill Road owned by Christopher Billings. The motion passed unanimously.
New Business
A. 622 E. McCarty Street
Ms. Senzee explained that this property is located within the School Street Local Historic District. The
property owner had some issues before the tornado and the tornado came through and made it worse.
The property owner was putting on a metal roof which is not within the established guidelines of the
School Street Local Historic District. However, the Building Official stopped work because they did not
have a permit. The Building Official did not communicate with Historic Preservation Staff about its need to
go through the Historic Preservation Commission. The Building Official left and when his staff was going
through his office, they found a building permit from last November. The house has been sitting out in the
elements with a tarp on it since November. The City does not have a mechanism in City Code as a
Historic Preservation Commission to approve or issue a certificate of appropriateness or any other type of
mechanism within the design guidelines of the School Street Local Historic District. It was staff
recommendation that the Commission allow the property owner to put on the roof so that the house does
not deteriorate further. City staff wanted to be transparent and expose the procedural issue. There is no
action that can occur tonight.
Ms. Ward suggested amending or revising the building permit application to reflect that a property is
located in a known local historic district or conservation district. She suggested listing the Capitol Avenue
Conservation Overlay District, School Street Local Historic District and Lower Jefferson Historic District on
the application so that the property owner can mark which district their property is located in. This way the
Building Inspector can verify that.
Ms. Schantz asked if staff can report to the Commission each month on the progress of the code
changes.
Ms. Senzee agreed to include this as a monthly agenda item. This is going to be an arduous task that
we are not always going to agree on how to proceed, at times, but will end up with the best possible
product in the end.
Ms. Schantz stated that this is really a continuation of one our goals set out in the Historic
Preservation Plan.
Other Business
A. National Alliance of Preservation Commissions — FORUM 2020 at Home
Ms. Senzee explained that City staff and Ms. Deetz participated in the 2020 FORUM at Home. NAPC
will be making all of the sessions available. As soon as that happens staff will send that link to the
Commission.
B. Gregory Stockard Award
Ms. Senzee stated that Jayme Abbott has been selected to receive the award this year. She has been
notified that she will be receiving the award. Ms. Abbott will be presented that award at the August 17,
2020 City Council Meeting.
C. Juneteenth Trail / Sterling Price Marker
Ms. Schantz stated that Mr. Wolford distributed a memo to Commission members regarding the
ownership of the Sterling Price Marker. The gist of the Conclusion is that the City owns the marker and
they can move it, remove it, conceal it and also transfer the ownership of it to someone else.
The following individuals spoke regarding this agenda item:
Mr. Bryan Wolford stated that he is in opposition to removing or altering the Civil War marker located
at Moreau Drive and Fairmount Boulevard. He is the current secretary and treasurer for Camp Lillie of
Sons of Union Veterans of the Civil War. He is also a member at large of Parsons Camp of the Sons of
Confederate Veterans. Mr. Wolford gave an in depth history of the battle and how some of Missouri's
prominent Governors took place in that battle. His recommendation is to utilize that space, put some more
information specifically about the Union's role in the battle and essentially protecting the City from the
attack.
Doris Opel Schmutzler stated that she believes the historical rock marker should stand. She talked
about how her the rock marker has personal significance to me, my family and members of my extended
family as the descendants of two German immigrants, Ehrhardt "Erhard" Johann Kautsch and Friedrich
Carl Strobel. Ms. Schmutzler is the great -great-granddaughter of Erhard Kautsch. These two men were
just farmers. They were in a field in a intersection of Route C and Route D just west of Jefferson City and
they were murdered. She continued to explain the remainder her family's story.
Pete Oetting, distributed the Battlefield Flag and Monument Policy as approved during the 136th
National Encampment in Lansing Michigan in 2017. Mr. Oetting is connected with Sons of Union
Veterans. He is the Commander of Camp Lillie. The national encampment policy letter from Lansing,
Michigan in 2017 states, among other things, the Sons of Union Veterans is against the removal of any
war monument or marker. Mr. Oetting identifies the marker on Moreau Drive as a Civil War Marker. Mr.
Oetting has known people in Jefferson City that did research based on that marker. He stated it would be
a shame if this community went down the road of changing names and changing monuments. Mr. Oettng
indicated the Camp Lillie chapter would be interested in putting a marker alongside the Sterling Price
Marker which would commemorate the Battle of 1864 for the Union side.
Fr. Richard Frank is the Chaplin of Camp Lillie, Sons of Union Veterans. Fr. Frank was against doing
anything to the monument because it does not glorify the Confederacy, it does not glorify slavery, it
simply states a historical fact that the Confederate Army was stopped. Fr. Frank believed the monument
should stay but also add some additional interpretation. The State has put up many beautiful interpretive
signs at various places relating to the Civil War. He just saw a whole bunch of them at the Battle of
Athens in far northeastern Missouri. A beautiful wayside or interpretive display about the size of this
podium would be good to put at that spot as well.
Ms. Schantz asked Commission members whether we want to take the lead from the Human
Relations Commission and come up with a specific recommendation or to send a memo to the City
Council that summarizes the testimony that has been presented and/or other ideas the HPC might have.
Ms. Ward stated that the first step would be to take this issue to a City Committee such as the
Administration Committee or the Public Works and Planning Committee. She explained that she serves
on the Administration Committee and would be able to put this issue on the next agenda.
After additional discussion, Commission members agreed that summarizing the testimony from the
July 14, 2020 meeting and from tonight's meeting and providing to City Council would be an appropriate
action.
After additional discussion, Mr. Berendzen moved and Mr. Hoffman seconded to not remove the
marker and additional information specifically about the event can be added as money and time allows.
Mr. Berendzen amended the original motion to include a summary of testimony received from the July
14, 2020 meeting and tonight's meeting and provide to the City Council.
After no additional discussion, the Commission's vote on the amended motion was unanimous.
D. HPF Grant Proposals
Ms. Senzee explained that staff would like to redo the Historic Eastside Survey and continue the
survey along W. Main Street where the previous survey ended.
Discussion centered around the survey boundaries for the continuation of the W. Main Street Survey.
Mr. Berendzen suggested surveying W. Main Street on both sides of the street to the Water Tower.
E. Jefferson City Exterior Structural Survey — Missouri State Capitol District & Munichburg Commercial
Districts
Ms. Senzee reported on the structural survey for the downtown area and Old Munichburg area. A
public meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, August 18, 2020 at 5:30 p.m. A structural survey was completed
to determine the viability of over 100 the structures in these areas. The consultant gave each building a
condition of green, yellow or red.
F. CDBG-DR Action Plan
Ms. Senzee reported that the State of Missouri published the State's CDBG-DR Recovery Plan for
flooding and the May 22, 2019 tornado. Cole County is eligible for approximately $7 million. The plan
proposes funding for voluntary buyout in the flood plain. It also proposes acquisition of property and new
construction of 5+ unit multi -family housing development. Restoration activities are not eligible as well.
Staff will be making comments that the proposed plan does not address the needs in that area.
Ms. Patterson stated that she would like to see the City's recommendations and make comments on
those.
Ms. Schantz stated that the Commission's consensus is to review the City's recommendations and
make comments on those.
G. National Register Nomination -2113 W. Main Street
Ms. Senzee explained that a National Register nomination is being prepared for 2113 W. Main Street,
also known as the Sugarbaker property. The Colonial Revival home was built in 1939 and was purchased
by Dr. Everett and Geneva Sugarbaker in 1950. A 500 square foot laboratory was built in 1953.
Dates to Remember
A. Next Regular Meeting Date, September 8, 2020
Since this meeting date falls the day after the Labor Day Holiday, the City Council will meet on this
date. Ms. Stratman will look at moving the meeting date to September 15 and notify the Commission.
Adiournment
Ms. Patterson moved and Mr. Berendzen seconded to adjourn the meeting at 7:37 p.m. The motion
passed unanimously.
City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
Special Meeting — Wednesday, August 26, 2020
Council Chambers — John G. Christy Municipal Building
320 E. McCarty Street
Commission Members Present
Mary Schantz, Chairperson
Gregory Bemboom
Alan Wheat
Michael Berendzen
Tiffany Patterson
Brad Schaefer
Steven Hoffman
Donna Deetz, Vice Chairperson
Gail Jones, Via Telephone
Council Liaison Present
Laura Ward
Staff Prpspnt
Rachel Senzee, Neighborhood Services Supervisor
Anne Stratman, Neighborhood Services Specialist
Karlie Reinkemeyer, Neighborhood Services Specialist
Ryan Moehlman, City Attorney
Guests Present
Frank E. Wallemann
Herbert Turner
Danny Creason
Jacqulin Johnson
Jenny Smith
Terry Lyskowski
Roger Baker
Doris Schmutzler
Gary Schmutzler
Fr. Richard Frank
Edith Vogel
Scott Randolph
Susan Randolph
Jan Schumacher
Dick Dalton
Pete Oetting
William Musgront
Jay Barnes
Patsy Johnson
Nimrod Chapel Jr
Glover Brown
Rebecca Ambrose, via telephone
Call to Order
Ms. Schantz called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m.
Attendance Record
7 of 8
7 of 8
7 of 8
5 of 8
4of5
7 of 8
7 of 8
7 of 8
6 of 8
Adoption of Agenda
Ms. Deetz moved and Mr. Wheat seconded to adopt the agenda as printed. The motion passed
unanimously.
Other Business
A. Sterling Price Marker
Ms. Schantz stated that the Historic Preservation Commission is not the deciding body for this issue.
She stated that the City Council will be the final decision body for this issue. Ms. Schantz explained the
HPC is an advisory committee and in that role it can make a recommendation to the Council. She stated
that the public will have an opportunity to testify again to the City Council. Ms. Schantz explained that the
Historic Preservation Commission heard this issue twice, once at the July 14 meeting and again at the
August 11 meeting. Mr. Paul Kiekhaefer testified via telephone at the July 14 meeting. She stated that at
the July meeting the HPC did not know who owned the marker. At the August 11 meeting the testimony
was centered around keeping the marker and contextualizing the spot. Ms. Schantz explained that shortly
after the August meeting, information was received from Mr. Jay Barnes about research he did on this
issue. Ms. Schantz thought it was relevant and was not something the HPC had heard before and began
the process of organizing a special meeting. She stated that the HPC will hear from Mr. Barnes and one
representative from those that feel the marker shall remain and one representative from those that feel
the marker should be removed.
Mr. Jay Barnes, 715 Swifts Highway, submitted a one page sheet with screen shots of text from
literature from the United Daughters of the Confederacy. He submitted a 32 page document titled
"Jefferson City in the Civil War". Mr. Barnes stated it is important to recognize that people who would like
the marker removed do not want to erase history at all. "We want to celebrate the true history of our
community. Our community and the Civil War has a history that everyone should be proud of. In 1861, a
steamer landed at the foot of Jackson Street and dropped off troops. In 1862, Mr. Bernard Bruns was
elected Mayor of our city. In 1863, Jefferson City was a beacon of freedom for slaves in Boone County
and Callaway County. The only marker in the city commemorating the Civil War is the marker on Moreau
Drive. An article in the News Tribune by Jenny Smith told the story that the Union troops and the citizens
of our town banded together to fortify our city and defend it, thereby tricking General Sterling Price into
believing there were far more troops than there actually was. The people of our community fought a war
to prevent slavery. Sterling Price made his decision to turn away at the site of the Wallendorf Cabin. He
never came close to where that marker is. Honoring our history means more than removing this marker, it
means erecting other markers and other monuments in our community about our real history."
Roger Baker stated he wanted to talk about history. He metal detects as a pastime. "If I understand
history correctly Confederate forces carried infield rifles. Just down the street from where the marker
stands now and about 5 houses going southeast on Moreau Drive I dug infield rifle rounds out of one of
the yards. Confederate forces did reach Moreau Drive within about 5 houses where the monument
stands. I also dug infield rounds in McClung Park. I cannot guarantee that they were not northern rounds
but they were infield rounds. I believe that if not Price himself but some of his army did get into the city.
I'm bothered; I don't know where this is coming from to remove everything historical from our country. We
can't change history; if we do we are going to relive it. I don't necessarily mean the monument is a good
thing. The monument recognizes the high water mark of General Sterling Price's attempt to come into the
city. That is a big plus for the Union troops. I don't care whether the monument stays or goes. If we
remove every vestige of history for whatever it is, we are bound to face it again."
Patsy Johnson, 908 Lafayette Street, is a Commissioner in Jefferson City, a member of the NAACP,
a member of the National Organization of Women Jefferson City Chapter and a member of the Racial
Equity Group. She stated that she spends a lot of time working for human rights locally and in other
national organizations. As a child she had walk past the monument on her way to school. Upon reading it
she found out it was a Confederate monument by the United Daughters of the Confederacy. She was hurt
because the monument was in a public place and that told her it was important. This was an
uncomfortable area to be in because of the treatment we received. "There are more positive things that
we can embrace in this community to share because it gives different messages to different people."
Rebecca Ambrose, 1001 Fairmount Boulevard, stated that she has read the monument many times
and does not see that it glorifies Sterling Price. "Without that monument there would be no known history
of the Civil War in Jefferson City. With that marker we at least know that the Confederate forces were in
our neighborhood." She found a Civil War bullet and mule shoe in her front yard. "They at least came
through there but nothing says that the General stood at that spot. We need to use history to show what a
great country this really is." Ms. Ambrose stated that she would welcome ideas to change the wording.
She would like to see something done that would keep this history alive.
Terry Lyskowski, 1722 Hayselton Drive, stated that it is important to say that people are not against
historical monuments. "What is important is accurate history. The monument on Moreau Drive is a fixture
in her memory as a child. As an adult it is not an innocent patriotic monument. It needs to be removed.
This is an opportunity for the community to come together and say that they are not against public
monuments, but that they are against inaccurate history."
Frank Walleman, 4627 Shepherd Hills Road Apt 410, stated that he searched Civil War monuments
and found that this marker is 1 of 2 markers in Jefferson City. The other marker sits on the Capitol
grounds right across from the Post Office. "I am concerned with what the monument says. I do not see
how that language can be interpreted as memorializing General Price unless it is memorializing his
failures. He intended to attack Jefferson City, he failed and he retreated. I think we are memorializing that
spot. As a historical marker I think it is important to stay. This marker was put there to locate a site of
something that happened that was extremely important to Jefferson City. Jefferson City avoided a major
Civil War battle, loss of life and loss of property. That particular spot was as close as they Confederate
soldiers got to the City of Jefferson." Mr. Walleman submitted a Sons of Union Veterans of the Civil War,
Civil War Assessment Form that another marker is located in Jefferson City in the general vicinity of the
State Capitol.
Nimrod Chapel, 701 Primrose Court, stated that his family did not elect to live in the Moreau Drive
neighborhood because of the marker. "That is a marker dedicated to the Confederacy by the Daughters
of the Confederacy." To Mr. Chapel the Civil War was not a fight about property, but a fight about human
dignity. "There is nothing historic about the marker. The marker needs to be removed completely and not
moved to another place."
Glover Brown, 1700 Valley Hi Road, stated that he was at the July 14 meeting and would like to go on
record and straighten out a comment made. "I want to go on record as saying that I am for any monument
that is recognized by the National Park Service, historical society or city where it sits. When you start
removing monuments you start removing history. Instead of removing monuments, correct the history.
When the younger generation looks at what is going on there is nothing there. If we could sit down and
have a dialogue we can correct any injustices. As far as Sterling Price he represents something that
happened around Jefferson City."
Bob Priddy, 1744 Englewood Drive, stated, "We at least need to change the plaque on that stone. It is
true that a number of Civil War artifacts have been found at that site. That rock does not represent the
high water mark of the Confederacy when they attacked Jefferson City. That rock has been moved from
its original location about four -tenths of a mile further down the road. That is where it was originally
located. Historians say that is where the Confederates started to turn west. Union forces were four -tenths
of a mile towards the city. Halfway between the original and present locations of the rock was a home
where traditions tell us Union forces on the roof monitored Price's movements. I think moving that rock to
a new location with a new plaque that tells the true history would probably be the best way to repudiate
the whole idea of the United Daughters of the Confederacy had when they put that memorial there. We
need to have historic monuments in this town that tell the truth of the Civil War."
Jenny Smith, 1211 Elmerine, stated that she supports removing the monument and replacing it with
one which more accurately honors the event on October 7, 1864. "So many people did not know about
this encounter on the southeast end of Jefferson City. The whole city was involved in defending Jefferson
City, the citizens and the army that was here. There were guards that were sentried on top of Nick
Monaco's house on Moreau Drive. They were also at the Dulle House watching the rebel movements to
the southeast of the city. There has been mention that maybe the monument is in the wrong spot
because it has been moved. My position is that it is in a good spot to honor the Union effort that took
place. There were serval thousand Union soldiers camped on Fairmount Boulevard which at that time
was the Cole County Fairgrounds. They also camped at McClung Park, Nick Monaco's house, Elmerine
and Lee Streets. That monument is at the center of a lot of Union activity. The rebels had crossed the
Moreau River at the bottom of Greenberry Road. I am interested to hear of Mr. Baker's finding of artifacts
to support the fact that the Confederates were up here. This also supports the fact things did happen.
There were skirmishes by the Osage River where the rebels crossed the river. There were estimates of
10,000 to 12,000 rebels approaching our city and crossing the river in waves. Some reports said they
were 3 miles long in their march. The Union had a vigorous defense at the river to defend the city against
their approach and slow the rebels down. I support preserving history. This monument is offensive and it
should be removed."
Dick Dalton, 1311 Isom Drive, stated that he recently learned about what was written on the marker
from Ms. Johnson. He has gone by the marker many times and did not realize what it was about. He
realized that the United Daughters of the Confederacy was what the rest of the country had been talking
about for several years. "Culture is shifting and it is time to re-examine our culture." The more he read
about the United Daughters of the Confederacy, "this was not a gift that we would be proud of. This war
happened all over the place. There is not a way for us to memorialize every place. History happened; we
are not forgetting the Civil War. I am for the removal of the monument. We want to start over that and find
some way other way to represent history."
Pete Oetting, Sons of Union Veterans of the Civil War, stated that he has spoken to the Commission
before about the Sons of Union Veterans' stance on the removal of monuments. "We are just past the
100 year anniversary of the Battle of Verdun in France. In the Battle of Verdun over 650,000 to 700,000
died. There were 17 French villages destroyed. Still today in Verdun, France there is a monument to the
German high water mark of the Imperial Army. Here in Jefferson there were over 750 Union soldiers that
are buried in the National Cemetery that died in this location, 75 to 80 of them came from the Centralia
area. There are also Confederate soldiers that died too. If we remove this monument how long is it before
we start to remove and desecrate graves and tombstones. They cannot speak, that is why I am here to
speak for them. People in the Republic of France left a German monument alone even as brutal as the
imperial Army was. I think we can leave the Confederate monument there too. I would like to reiterate that
the Sons of Union Veterans would also like to occupy that space."
Fr. Richard Frank, 803 Air View Drive, stated that he spoke at the last meeting and expressed a
concern of the trend today of trying to revise, alter or erase history. "What is being done to monuments in
our country is a part of that. Even though the United Daughters of the Confederacy gave us this
monument, I do not like to refer to it as a Confederate monument because it doesn't glorify the
Confederacy by the simple wording and it doesn't justify slavery, it just states a historical fact. In fact if
anything it illustrates the defeat of the Confederacy since they did not attack due to the Union efforts. I do
have a personal interest because my great grandfather served in the effort in the Missouri Calvary 5th
Regiment. He served in the effort to keep the Confederates from coming into the city. We recommended
at the last meeting to keep the monument but add interpretation."
Jan Schumacher, 2026 Trenton Court, stated that she has been involved in historic preservation in
various communities and projects for the last 20-25 years. Ms. Schumacher read a portion of the
statement from the National Trust for Historic Preservation Statement on Confederate Monuments. "The
National Trust for Historic Preservation has previously issued statements about the history and
treatment of Confederate monuments, emphasizing that, although some were erected—like other
monuments to war dead—for reasons of memorialization, most Confederate monuments were
intended to serve as a celebration of Lost Cause mythology and to advance the ideas of white
supremacy. Many of them still stand as symbols of those ideologies and sometimes serve as
rallying points for bigotry and hate today. To many African Americans, they continue to serve as
constant and painful reminders that racism is embedded in American society. We believe it is past
time for us, as a nation, to acknowledge that these symbols do not reflect, and are in fact
abhorrent to, our values and to our foundational obligation to continue building a more perfect
union that embodies equality and justice for all". Ms. Schumacher stated that she would like to
see the marker removed and have other information about the Civil War in other locations so that
they are more prominently seen and also an accurate reflection of the events that happened.
Paul Kiekhaefer, 1602-A Street Northeast, Washington, D.C. testified via telephone. He stated
that he wanted to address some of the concerns that he heard throughout the process and tonight
where a number of people have mentioned they don't want to revise history. He wanted to clarify
this monument in itself is revising history. "The monument itself is revisionist history, the effort to
remove the monument is an effort to tell history in a way that is coherent and clear and respectful
to those who were oppressed in the past. Let's be creative, we are a city that cares about history.
We are a city that has a wonderful monument in the State Capitol. We can come up with
something that tells the history of the Civil War in a way that is respectful. We do not need the
United Daughters of the Confederacy to tell that history."
Mr. Berendzen stepped out at 6:55 p.m. Mr. Berendzen came back in at 6:57 p.m.
Edith Vogel, 800 St Mary's Boulevard, stated that she is the owner of Camp Lillie of the Union
Army during the Civil War. She is the private landowner of that piece of property which consists of
about three acres remaining from G.H. Dulle's farm that was confiscated by the Union Army for
General John S. Fremont as Camp Fremont. She stated that she listened interestedly to
everyone's testimony and would like to step forward and address the Commission that she is
willing to help the situation. If the Commission recommends to the City Council removal of the
stone and plaque from Moreau Drive, Ms. Vogel would be willing to put it up at Camp Lillie minus
the bottom part that says presented by the United Daughters of the Confederacy.
Brian Kaylor, 3725 Scarborough Way, stated that as cities across the nation remove
monuments honoring Confederate traitors and enslavers our city should too. Monuments and
memorials are not about history but honor. "You would not be able to learn about the Civil War by
splitting our Confederate rock. We teach the past in classes and in books. Monuments on the
other hand, are about who we wish to honor today and what values we wish to honor in the future.
Removing this marker will not be rewriting or erasing history; it will be removing an honor to a
traitor and enslaver."
Public testimony concluded at 7:01 p.m.
Ms. Schantz stated that the Commission has a couple of choices, they can change the
recommendation made at last month's meeting which was to let the marker remain and be
contextualized or they can leave it the same.
Mr. Schaefer inquired of the motion made at last month's meeting.
Ms. Schantz stated that the motion was to not remove the marker and additional information
specifically about the event can be added as money and time allows. She stated that this motion passed
unanimously.
Ms. Patterson moved and Mr. Hoffman seconded to reconsider the Historic Preservation
Commission's decision from the August 11, 2020 meeting. The motion passed 8-1 with the following role
call vote:
Aye: Berendzen, Deetz, Hoffman, Jones, Patterson, Schaefer, Schantz, Wheat
Nay: Bemboom
Mr. Berendzen stated that at the last meeting the goal of the motion that was made and voted on was
to contextualize the monument to bring it more into perspective with what actually happened. "We have
the choice of either removing or keeping the monument. I am also wondering if there is not a middle
ground that helps to not only contextualize but also get the correct history that happened in that area.
One of the things that I have considered is rather than removing or keeping the monument but replacing.
Replace the existing marker with a marker that more accurately depicts the history that occurred in that
area."
Ms. Patterson stated that she agrees with contextualizing the marker. "There is a point in the museum
and historic preservation field where the money has to meet the road. If there is no money to do this than
15 years from now we are going to have this same discussion because there has been no money to
remove it. So I am a historian and I work in museums and we are all about saving and preserving and
contextualizing history but there is also who is going to do this. We can make a recommendation to the
City Council that it be contextualized but where is the City Council going to come up with the funds. I
would personally move to remove the marker because at this time in our history we cannot easily
contextualize it because we do not have the funds to do that."
Ms. Patterson moved and Mr. Hoffman seconded to recommend to the City Council that the Sterling
Price Marker be removed.
Discussion:
Ms. Jones stated that she is in agreement that the marker should be removed, "because if our
history is also supposed to be educational they are stating that it is not the correct information
that is depicted on the rock so it needs to be removed. If you want to do something else in place
of it I am all for that."
Mr. Schaefer stated that, "we should still add verbage to add some context to it or replace it.
They will find money to remove it, if they can look towards something to replace it."
Mr. Bemboom stated that, "it is not what the plaque says; it is who gave the plaque. It is part
of the history of Jefferson City, but I totally disagree with the United Daughters of the Confederacy
but it is still part of our history. So if we could leave it with a new plaque of some kind. I'm a little
opposite of taking it away but I don't know how to recommend it. I don't agree with what's there."
Ms. Schantz questioned the idea of asking the City Council to consider doing something in
that location that would tell the proud history of Jefferson City's role or what happened in
Jefferson City during the Civil War. "We are trying to accommodate everyone's thoughts on this."
Ms. Patterson stated that she is all for the Commission recommending improved interpretation
of the Civil War history in Jefferson City either there or at another location. The current location is
not the easiest access point for the majority of the City.
Ms. Schantz reiterated that the motion before the HPC is to remove the marker and it has
been seconded. In absence of a friendly amendment accepted by the maker we have to vote on
this motion as is. "Does someone have additional language that they would like to give to this?"
Mr. Berendzen asked if Ms. Patterson would accept a friendly amendment.
Ms. Patterson stated that what people want to say in a friendly amendment is that we
recommend removal of the marker and add context that looks to the future to better interpret the
Civil War in Jefferson City through additional markers or monuments.
Ms. Schantz reiterated that the Historic Preservation Commission is recommending to the City
Council that the monument be removed and that they should consider better interpretation of the
history of the Civil War in Jefferson City through markers and other appropriate means.
Mr. Bemboom stated that he is thinking about leaving the rock and redoing the plaque. The
rock is itself part of history and people talk about not knowing what is on the rock. Maybe there is
a way to leave the rock and put on a new plaque or something more encompassing history.
Ms. Patterson commented that the rock is as much of a gift from the United Daughters of the
Confederacy as the plaque is.
Mr. Bemboom stated that, "sadly the United Daughters of the Confederacy is part of history
and I do not agree with one part of it."
Ms. Schantz stated that maybe, "we should just go ahead and try to make a decision on the
motion before us. The motion before us is to recommend removal of the monument. There has not
been a friendly amendment yet. Is the friendly amendment that there be a better interpretation of
the history of the Civil War in Jefferson City through markers and other appropriate means.
Ms. Deetz stated that she sees where Mr. Bemboom is coming from. Again it goes back to
freedom of speech.
Mr. Bemboom stated that he does not agree with so much of that, "except it is a part of history
and I would like it to be a more inclusive history. It is still part of history whether I like it or not."
Ms. Schantz reiterated that the Jefferson City Historic Preservation Commission recommends
the removal of the monument and the City Council consider providing a better interpretation of the
history of the Civil War in Jefferson City through other markers or monuments or appropriate
means.
Ms. Patterson stated that is a friendly amendment is fine and she accepts that amendment.
Mr. Berendzen offered as a friendly amendment that he recommends to the City Council that
in addition to removing the existing marker, it also replaces the marker with one that more
accurately depicts the historic events in the Moreau Drive and Fairmount Boulevard area.
Ms. Patterson stated that she accepts that amendment.
Mr. Bemboom stated that, "as a Commission I feel like it represents the feeling of everybody
we heard here. We are interested in history, we are interested in a marker, and we don't love that
marker. I don't think we as a Commission can recommend anything more inclusive to the people
here."
Ms. Schantz asked of Ms. Patterson whether she will accept the friendly amendment as
originally stated by Mr. Berendzen. Ms. Patterson accepted that friendly amendment. Mr. Hoffman
seconded the original motion and accepts the friendly amendment.
Ms. Schantz stated, "the motion before us that we will recommend to the City Council that the
monument be removed and in addition that we replace the marker with one that more accurately
depicts the historic events in the Moreau Drive and Fairmount Boulevard area."
The motion passed 9-0 with the following roll call vote:
Aye: Bemboom, Berendzen, Deetz, Hoffman, Jones, Patterson, Schaefer, Schantz, Wheat
Adiournment
Ms. Patterson moved and Mr. Berendzen seconded to adjourn the meeting at 7:27 p.m. The motion
passed unanimously.
City of Jefferson
Department of Planning 6 Protective Services
320 E McCarty Street
Jefferson City, MO 65101
Phone: 573-634-6410
icolannina(Nieffcitymo.ora
www...jeffersoncitymo.gov
APPLICATION FOR MURAL PERMIT
The undersigned hereby petitions the Director for a permit to display a mural. Please type or print clearly. Please
attach the application fee of $55. (Revised July 1, 2018)
Part A. Applicant and Property Information; complete Applicant Information Form and attach.
Name of Applicant: CLA\\- a,\ N'Ac �.oMM\SS\O^
Name of Sponsoring Organization, if any:
3. Property Address: E. La -q �to\ ^v, i W__'� I 0-V-
4 Legal/Property Description (or Attach):
5 Zoning Designation of the Property: PU Q
6. Is the Property located in a National Historic District, Local Historic District or Local
Conservation District? _No Yes, Name of District: Ca.etko\ A\72 E)�SEoric D'�sFc c�
7. is Pjoperty located in an area covered by a registered business or neighborhood association?
No _Yes, Name of Association
Part B. Describe the mural below. `
1. Location of mural: on Fo ce ocCT'\ocN lc. oW (019 66 e lccic c\c_2_
2. Mural Dimensions - Height: CWidth (o5 --tor Area: 390 sq. ft.
Graphic Medium -
�( Paint (specify type) �cc
Constructed (specify material
If constructed, specify
�( Other (specify) vat y,\
method:
4. Will the mural be lighted?
X No _ Yes (Specify type, location of lighting)
5. Time frame: Anticipated start date: Cl /a 1 Jo16.10
Anticipated completion date of the mural: io 5 Fjoac>
6. Staging area requirements:
�( On-site only
❑ On public street or sidewalk
On adjacent property (please attach permission letter from property owner)
For Staff Use Only:
Fee Received: Cash: _Receipt # Check: _Check #
Date Received:
Application Number. M -
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the
Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request.
Page 1 of 8
Part C. Attachments. Please include the following attachments with the completed application:
,lt Applicant Information Sheet
Copy of the contract between Artist and Property Owner
Plan -view of the site and mural location depicting information required
,N Project narrative describing the proposed design, materials and name of designer or artist;
U If mural is to be lighted: Lighting plan indicating type, location and intensity of fixtures; electrical plan
` 4 Rendering or reduced -size copy of the proposed mural
U Permission letter(s), if needed, for staging areas
$55 application fee
Part D. Signatures and Certifications. The artist and all property owners must sign the application. If
additional signatures are needed, please attach separate sheets.
Artistes Certification. I certify that the information contained in this application is complete and accurately represents the
proposed mural. I have read Sections 3-30 to 3-38 of the City Code and agree to abide by the requirements relating to
murals.
Artist's Signature: Date: Q 2 v
Applicant's or Sponsor's Certific 'on. I certify that the information contained in this application is complete and
accurately represents the proposed mural. I have read Sections 3-30 to 3-38 of the City Code and agree to abide by the
requirements relating to murals.
Applicant's Signature: Date: 2-1 -caro
Property Owner's Certiflca the applica not the property owner, a property owner must complete this
section and signature be notarized: I certify that I am the owner of the property referenced in Item #2 above, and I
hereby grant permission to the Applicant to establish the proposed mural described in this application upon the referenced
property. (Only one property owner is required flp sign.)
Property Owner's Signaturow. r Date:
Property Owner's Signature: L Date:
Do not write below this line - for City use only
If APPROVED this application becomes the MURAL PERMIT.
All work is to be done in compliance with the laws and ordinances of the City of Jefferson, Missouri and in -- —
conformity with the application, plans and specifications filed with and approved by the Department of Planning
and Protective Services. By reviewing and acting on Mural Permit applications, the City is not considering,
assessing or acknowledging any responsibility for copyright and related matters. The research and assessment
of copyright and related matters shall be the responsibility of the Applicant and Artist.
This application for MURAL PERMIT does not
conform to Article III, Chapter 8 and is DENIED
for the following reasons:
of Planning and Protective
Page 2 of 8
❑ APPROVED
U CONDITIONALLY APPROVED
This application for MURAL PERMIT conforms
to Article III, Chapter 8 and is APPROVED
subject to the following conditions:
Department of Planning and Protective
Services:
/s/
Date
This application for MURAL PERMIT does not
conform to Article III, Chapter 8 and is DENIED
for the following reasons:
of Planning and Protective
Page 2 of 8
City of Jefferson
Department of Planning 8 Protective Services
310 E. McCarty Street
Jefferson City, MO 65101
Phone: 573-634-6410
iculanning0leffcitvmo. ora
www.Jeffersoncitym o.gov
Project Information (Please use additional sheets if necessary)
Name of Project
Ga Ow\ Finte
Location/Address
t!p jQ
Submitted by
Applications Submitted
(Check box and circle
item)
❑ P&Z: Zonin¢ Amend Comp Plan Amend Special Exception PUD Sub Plat Annexation
❑ BOA: CUP Variance Appeal
❑ Staff: Site Plan Bldg Plans Grading Plan Change of Use Temp Use
❑ Clher:
Consultant(s) (List lead consultant and all others who are responsible for major project elements)
Lead Consultant Name
4AA�A-n Pot \\O
Firm Name
SC- PACKS
Address
to LCJ Q rj •
Telephone Number
- Ljp -
Fax No.
E -Mail
190Tce\\o - e -WC\:% t MO • cw
Consultant Name
�M QpejC
Firm Name
P0.f
Address
12qg 5k.
Telephone Number
G3 `-\I - (05-7-1Fax
No.
E -Mail
ASc\.Coeper 4�%`l Mb .00
Consultant Name
%fn
Firm Name
Address
CORY LMO O
Telephone Number
SCA - 9 - c* \
Fax No.
E -Mail
0, reeA-,boX\K g3 mca,\ . cope.
Property Owners/Applicants (List owner; Mark "X" next to the name of the primary contact)
Owner Name
ft -k1 {i r4
LLL
Address
1� (_.'
E lTb IME, glut }Cf G In
Telephone No.
��'J' �J3-�D 333
Fax No.
E -Mail
\\ C Stt t t r �l�G
Applicant Name
Address
Telephone No.
Fax No.
E -Mail
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans
with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request.
Page 3 of 8
Excerpt of Chapter 3 of City Code, Adverting and Signs
Article III. Murals
Sec 3-30. Intent and Rules.
The intent of this article is to protect the public interest and safety, to enhance preserve, and protect buildings and -
structures, and promote art, aesthetics and high standards of appearance within the city while permitting certain murals.
The purpose of the Mural Permit is to provide a method for reviewing proposed murals to ensure that the mural complies
with the criteria outlined below.
A. The provisions of this article shall apply to the erection, alteration, reconstruction, construction, maintenance and
removal of all murals as herein defined.
B. To the extent that any other provision of this article shall be more restrictive than the provisions set forth in this
article, the more restrictive provision shall apply.
C. The sections, paragraphs, clauses, and phrases of this article are severable and if any phrase, clause, sentence,
paragraph or section of this article shall be declared unlawful by the valid judgment, decree or injunction order of
a court of competent jurisdiction, such ruling shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences,
paragraphs and sections of this article. In the event that, contrary to the policies, interests, and values of the City, a
court of competent jurisdiction issues a judgment, decree or injunction order that this article is unlawful because of
any omission or prohibition in this article, then all provisions of this article not specifically declared to be unlawful
shall remain in full force and effect. In the event that a judgment, decree or injunction order declaring all or a
portion of this article to be unlawful is reversed or vacated by a court of competent jurisdiction, the provisions
contained in this article shall remain in full force and effect.
D. By reviewing and acting on Mural Permit applications, the City is not considering, assessing or acknowledging any
responsibility for copyright and related matters. The research and assessment of copyright and related matters shall
be the responsibility of the Applicant.
Sec. 3-31. Definitions.
Erect: To construct, build, raise, assemble, place, affix, attach, create, paint, draw or in any other way bring into
being or establish.
Mural: A painting, graphic design, or pictorial representation applied directly or attached to an exterior mounting
surface or exterior wall that is visible from any point of any public right-of-way including public street, sidewalk or
greenway trail. Any representation which identifies a business or building by logo, product, service, trademark, message, or
slogan shall be considered a sign.
Sec. 3-32. Permit Requirement.
A. A permit is required for the display of a mural. No mural may be painted directly on a wall, fence or building
surface except as authorized by a mural permit issued pursuant to this article.
1. Mural Permits are obtained through an application procedure. The application shall be provided
by the Department of Community Development (hereafter known as "Department"). A Mural Permit sha"e
issued by the Director of Community Development or designee (hereafter known as "Director") only after staff
review of the application. (Ord. No. 13301, 11-5-2001)
2. If lighting is proposed, a separate Electrical Permit shall be required. The Electrical Inspector
shall inspect all electrical work for compliance with the Jefferson City Electrical Code.
Sec. 3-33. Application for Mural Permit.
A. Any person, firm, or corporation owning real property within the City may file an application requesting a Mural
Permit for the property.
B. All applications shall be accompanied by:
1. A check payable to the "City of Jefferson" in an amount as set forth in Appendix Y; and -----
2. A copy of the contract that allows an artist to paint a mural on the property. The provisions of the
contract shall be in accordance with this article.
Page 4 of 8
(Ord. 14272, §4, 10-15-2007)
C. The application shall be on a form supplied by the Department and filed with the Director and shall include:
1. Address and legal description of the property location;
2. Correct zoning designation of the property;
3. Name, address telephone number and signature of all property owners;
4. Name, address, telephone number and signature of the artist;
5. Name, address, telephone number of the sponsoring organization;
6. Description of the proposed mural, including:
a. Location depicted upon a plan -view of the site; - ---
b. Rendering or reduced -size copy of the proposed mural, with placement, height, and overall area
of mural indicated and drawn to scale;
C. Graphic medium i.e., whether painted or constructed, and types of materials to be used and
anchoring methods;
d. Lighting and electrical plan; - -- —
e. Project narrative describing the proposed design, materials and name of designer or artist;
f. Time frame for the completion of the mural;
g. Staging and construction area. The area around the proposed mural needed for staging and/or
construction shall be indicated upon the plan.
Sec. 3-34. Mural Permit Processing.
A The Director shall review and rule on Mural Permit applications submitted for any mural proposed within the
incorporated limits of the City of Jefferson pursuant to the regulations and procedures set forth below:
1. Within thirty (30) days of submittal of an application for Mural Permit to the Director, an adminisrr-ativp
hearing shall be scheduled. The application may be continued for a maximum of sixty (60) days from the
date of the first hearing.
2. The Director of Planning or designee shall notify adjoining and affected property owners within one
hundred eighty-five (185) feet of the mural site of the date and time of the hearing at which the Mural
Permit Application will be considered. The date and time of the Mural Permit Application hearing will
also be posted in the local newspaper as notification to the general public. -
4. The Director shall approve, deny or conditionally approve the Mural Permit, with reasons.
5. The decision of the Director shall be final unless an appeal is filed within ten (10) business days of the
decision. Appeals shall be filed with the Board of Adjustment pursuant to Sec. 35-100 of the Jefferson
City Code, and shall include:
a. The mural case or project being appealed, --- -
b. Reason for the appeal;
C. Printed name, address, telephone number and signature of each appellant.
B. Criteria for Approval of Mural Permit. The Director shall approve the Mural Permit upon finding the mural meets
the following criteria: - —
1. The mural meets the definition of Mural and is not a sign or form of advertisement.
2. The mural content is not obscene. For purposes of this section, any material is obscene if applying
contemporary community standards:
1. The predominant appeal is to prurient interest in sex; and
2. The average person would find the material depicts or describes sexual conduct in a patently
offensive way; and
Page 5 of 8
3. A reasonable person would find the material lacks serious literary, artistic, political or scientific
value.
3. The mural conforms to the Mural Design and Construction Standards outlined in Sec. 3-35.
4. The mural harmonizes with the structure or structures on the parcel on which it is to be painted and will
not negatively impact the historic resources within Jefferson City, nor cause these resources to lose their
state and national register eligibility. Murals proposed for properties within designated local historic or
conservation districts or national historic districts shall be subject to review by the appropriate review
agency, as indicated below. The Director shall submit the Mural Permit Application to the appropriate
review body:
a. National and State Districts: State of Missouri Historic Preservation Program;
b. Local Conservation or Historic Districts: City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission -
or -Neighborhood Association, as appropriate.
3. In the event that the Director submits a Mural Permit Application to a review body of
another government agency, the Director may allow another sixty (60) days for concurrent review by the
City and the other government agency. When this occurs, the application shall be processed in a
maximum of ninety (90) days.
4. The artist, property owner, and, if applicable, organization have provided proof of a
written contract that allows the artist to paint a mural on the property.
5. The placement, height, and overall area of mural shall be as approved by the Director.
Sec. 3-35. Mural Design and Construction Standards.
A. Location
1. Murals shall be authorized only in the Commercial and Industrial districts, or as part of a PUD Plan
approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. All applications for murals, including those proposed
for location in PUD zoning districts, shall be processed in accordance with this article.
2. No mural shall be located closer than five hundred (500) feet to any other mural.
B. Lighting.
1. All lighting within murals, located on murals, or directed to murals shall not exceed the maximum foot
candles of illumination provided for in Chapter 35, Zoning Code, for the zoning district in which the
mural is located and adjacent to.
2
No revolving or rotating beam or beacon of light that simulates any emergency light or device shall be
permitted as part of any mural. No flashing, intermittent, or moving light or lights will be permitted.
3. External lighting, such as floodlights, thin line and gooseneck reflectors are permitted,
1. Light sources that are directed upon the mural shall be effectively shielded so as to prevent beams or rays
of light from being directed onto any portion of the public right-of-way or onto adjacent property;
2. Illumination or lighting device shall not reflect or shine directly into the adjacent public rights of ways in
such a manner as to hamper the vision of a pedestrian, cyclist, or motor vehicle operator thereon;
3. No mural shall be so illuminated that it interferes with the effectiveness of, or obscures, an official traffic
sign, device or signal.
C. Construction of Murals _..
1. All murals shall be constructed so as to be free from hazards, and shall be strongly supported with braces,
posts, or cables if necessary. They shall be kept in good repair and all surfaces shall be maintained in
good appearance.
D. All electrical lighting shall conform to the Electrical Code.
E.
If the proposed mural materials are not compatible with surface mounting, the Director may allow for the mural to
be placed on its own substrate, set off from the mounting surface.
Page 6 of 8
Sec. 3-36. Mural Types Prohibited.
A. After the effective date of this article, there shall be erected, constructed or exhibited none of the following:
1. Murals or other representations which imitate or appear to imitate any official traffic sign or device or
which appear to regulate or direct the movement of traffic or which interferes with the proper operation of
any traffic sign or signal, or which obstructs or physically interferes with a motor vehicle operator's view
of approaching, merging, or intersecting traffic;
2. .Murals placed on areas of public ownership including street rights-of-way and public sidewalks except
that a projecting mural may extend no more than twelve inches from a building over a public sidewalk
3. Murals with moving parts, including solar, wind- or water -driven devices.
4. Murals affixed, applied or mounted above, upon or suspended from any part of the roof of a structure- --
5. Murals which incorporate reflective or metallic paints or materials;
6. Murals which fail to meet the lighting standards of Section 3-18 B.
Sec. 3-37. Preparation of Surface and Maintenance.
A A Mural Permit is issued with the understanding that the property owner or organization shall be responsible for
all maintenance, repair, and removal of the mural.
C.
In
Sand and high pressure water blasting are not allowed as a cleaning process, for either surface preparation or for
mural maintenance purposes in the National Register or local historic overlay districts.
The Department shall inspect or cause to be inspected every mural in the City. The Director shall require the—
maintenance, repair, removal, or covering with opaque paint or other appropriate material, of any mural which is
found to have been displayed in violation of this article, including any mural which is:
Not maintained, faded or in disrepair;
2. Not securely affixed to a substantial structure;3.
cyclists, pedestrians, or motorists.
4. Not in conformance with this article.
Creating a dangerous or unsafe condition for
An order to maintain, remove, repair, or cover a mural may be appealed to the Board of Adjustment, pursuant to
Sec. 35-100 of the Jefferson City Code, who shall schedule a hearing on the matter.
Sec. 3-38. Violations and Penalties.
A. In case any mural is erected, constructed, reconstructed, altered, converted, or maintained in violation of this
chapter or other regulations made under the authority conferred hereby, the Director or designee shall institute
proper action or proceedings to:
1. Prevent such unlawful erection, construction, reconstruction, alteration, conversion, maintenance or use;
2. Restrain, correct or abate such violation; or,
3. Prevent any such illegal act, conduct or use.
It shall be the duty of the Director to afford the offending party notice of the specific complaint by United States
Mail, giving said person ten days notice of the violation(s) or anticipated violation(s) and order the correction of
the violation.
Appeal of decisions of the Director. Where it is alleged there is an error in any order, requirement, decision or
determination made by the Director, any aggrieved person may appeal the order, requirement, decision or
determination to the Board of Adjustment in accordance with the provisions of Sec. 35-100 of the Jefferson City
Code.
Page 7 of 8
The City has the right to remove any non-compliant mural. If the Director shall find that any mural is unsafe or
insecure, is a menace to the public, is abandoned or maintained in a dilapidated condition, or has been constructed
or erected or is being maintained in violation of the provisions of this chapter, written notice must be given to the
organization or property owner thereof. If the organization or property owner fails to remove or alter the mural so
as to comply with the standards herein set forth within a reasonable time specified in such notice, such mural may
be removed or altered to comply. Any expense incidental to such removal or alteration shall be char&ed to the
owner of the property upon which the mural is located and shall constitute a lien upon the property.
D. The owner of a building or premises where a violation of any provision of this chapter has been committed or
shall exist, or the mural artist, organization, or any other person who commits, takes part, or assists in such
violation or who maintains any building or premises in which any such violation shall exist, shall be deemed
guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of not less than Ten Dollars ($10.00) and not more than One
Hundred Dollars ($100.00) for each and every day that said violation continues after due notice as provided—
herein, but if the offense be willful, on conviction thereof, the punishment shall be a fine of not less than One
Hundred Dollars ($100.00) nor more than Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($250.00) for each and every day that
such violation shall continue. Any person who, having been served with an order to remove any such violation,
shall fail to comply with said order within ten days after such service or shall continue to violate any provision of
the regulations made under authority of this chapter in the respect named in such order, shall also be subject to an
additional penalty of Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($250.00).
E. Nothing contained herein shall prevent the city from taking such other lawful actions as may be necessary to
prevent or remedy any violation.
(Ord. 13260, §4, 94-2001) _
Page 8 of 8
NPS Ir9O)10-900 4M6 No. 10024-0018
United States Department of the Interior
National Park Service
National Register of Historic Places
Registration Form
1. Name of Property
historic name Capitol Avenue Historic District
other names/site number NLA
2. Location
street & number The 400 - 700 blocks of Capitol Avenue. 104 and 200 blocks of adjacent north -
south streets from Adams to Gherry Street. [n/al not for publication
city or town Jefferson City [n/al vicinity
state Missouri code M4 county Cole code 051 zip code 65101
3. State/Federal_ Agencv Certification
as
re or cemrying
by cet.N that this rte
o et fjQ I Binn b�Cl� �arntsQlr�:Jnyimthat gis property be
PO Gate
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
State or era agency and bureau
in m opinion, the pro �y [xJ sets rLdoes not eet the National Register criteria.
{ Se� oonbnuatEon shet for additional mments].}
Sig—nature o certifying offic-iabMitle
State UFFeaeral agency and bureau
4. National Park Service Certification
I hereby certify that the property is:
j entered in the National R rster
See continuation sheet ].
j determined eligible for the
National Register
See continuation sheet � .
] determined not eligible for # e
National RegisTer.
j removed from the
National Register
other, explain
See continuation sheet [ J.
Signature of the Keeper
Date
Property Located at 617, 619, 621 & 623 E Capitol Ave. Jefferson City, MO 65101
Legal Description:
All of Inlet 137, in the City of Jefferson, Missouri; and, The Easterly part of Inlet No. 136, in the City of Jefferson,
Missouri, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Southeasterly corner of said Inlet; Thence Westerly
along the Southerly line thereof, 57 feet 10.5 inches; thence northerly parallel with the Easterly line of said Inlet, 198
Feet 9 inches, to the Northerly line thereof; thence Easterly along the said Northerly line, 57 feet 10.5 inches, to the
Northeasterly corner of said Inlet; thence Southerly along the Easterly line thereof, 198 feet 9 inches, to the point of
beginning; and, Part of Inlet 136, in the City of Jefferson, Missouri, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a
point on the Southerly line of said Inlet No. 136, a distance of 20 feet Easterly from the Southwesterly corner
thereof; thence easterly along the southerly line of said Inlet, 26 feet 6 inches; thence Northerly parallel with the
Westerly line thereof, 198 feet 9 inches, to the Northerly line of said Inlet; thence Westerly along said Northerly line, 26
feet 6 inches; thence Southerly parallel with the Westerly line thereof, 198 feet 9 inches, to the point of beginning.
Containing approximately 0.86 acres.
Parcel ID
Owncr Name
Mailing Address
City State Zip
Property Address
Property Description
Subdivision
Book -Page -Date I
Book -Page -Date 2
Book -Page -Date 3
Sec-Twn-Rng
Sq Ft -Above Grade
1103080003002018
STITT BARONY L L C
619 E CAPITOL AVE
JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101
619 E CAPITOL AVE
E 84.38' IL136 & ALL IL137
CITY OF JEFFERSON INLOT
655-259 6/22/2015
618-189 5/30/2012
277-791 11/22/1983
8/44/11
m
Basement Type
Fin. Bsmnt Sz-Sq Ft
Year Built
Date Certified
Prop Value -Land -Comm
Prop Value -Land -Ag
Prop Value -Land -Res
Prop Value-Imprv-Comm
Prop Value-Imprv-Ag
Prop Value-Imprv-Res
Appraised Value
0
1/1/2019
$112,400
$0
$0
$283,700
$0
$396,100
Disclaimer: Map and parcel data are believed to be accurate, but accuracy is not guaranteed. TTMap Scale
tis is not a 0 feet
5
= 1 inch legal document and should not be substituted for a title. eearch,appraisal, survey, orfor zoning verification. 5ch = 520
Project Narrative
Proposed Project: Capitol Ave Fence Mural
Location: 619 E. Capitol Ave.
Proposed Timeline: September 21, 2020 — October 5, 2020
This project is a collaborative effort between the Cultural Arts Commission and property owner
Holly Stitt. Capitol Ave has been integral part in enhancing the cultural arts in Jefferson City. Capitol Ave
and the Avenue HQ property that was destroyed by the tornado played an important role in bringing
more art opportunities to our town. Recent events include Porchfest JCMO, Art around Town Gallery
Crawl, comedy nights, Showdown Academy camps, and much more. With the revitalization taking place,
this mural will represent the resilience of our community.
This mural design was created by the property owner and artist, Amy Greenbank. It represents
JCMO Arts and honors the memory of Avenue HQ. Acrylic paint will be used on the fence and then
sealed with a varnish sealer. An anti -graffiti coat will be applied to protect the mural from vandalism. JC
Parks Cultural Arts Specialist Leann Porrello will oversee the project and future maintenance by working
with the artist.
I
Jim
Custom Art Commission Contract
This Agreement is made on the day of SPS (month), 2 u Z u (year), between the following:
The Artist
Name:+���t
Address:
Phone: -SU ? - �-4 d � - os�! Z Email:
The Pr(
Name:
Addres
Phone:
Yt FP—rSo%—
0
Agreement between Artist & Property Owner:
1. Artwork: The Property Owner has commissioned the Artist for the following work of art:
Medium: IQc.c \'.4 `� P Dimensions: Cn ° `7 D
Description: e c c.
Price: � 1�
The Artist will create a work of art based on the description above. The Artist agrees to create up to three preparatory
sketches from which to obtain Property Owner's approval before beginning the commissioned artwork. These images
may be emailed to the Property Owner for approval. All sketches are the property of the Artist.
Artist Propert O ne
Mural Fee Revenue Account
We are ready to move the $55.00 application fee to the account 10-100-450255. Please let us know
when you are ready for us to transfer those funds and we will get that complete. Thank you!
Leann Porrello
Cultural Arts Specialist
573-403-7812
Iporrello(a ieffcitymo.ora
Proposed Mural Date: 09-08-2020
619 E. Capitol Avenue
Please contact Ahnna Nanoski with the City of Jefferson at 573-634-6410 if you have any questions.
rj _
„� � �,` •«,,�,, - - ��� � -La
#It C11 ri-t
.`' ]rMyir �-`` �� - C+..: il� - .� o-- .._ �` C9.Sv,r.�i � \'I� \` t rmiVT.'✓C'^3C""':�
+,versa-� -tves- -.rte+-snw... � .�^•a.K.+---""�"'
Proposed Design
�0
11-7j-
714 �o
FR
9�
/�d L
T
9LF
Location Map
0 20 40 80 Feet
N
W ® E
S