HomeMy Public PortalAbout2022_01_11_Council_Agenda_Packet_REVISED(1)
2022_01_11_Council_Agenda_Packet_REVISED(1).pdf
TOWN OF LEESBURG Town Hall, 25 West Market Street AGENDA Town Council Meeting January 11, 2022 7:00 PM Council Chamber 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. INVOCATION a. Council Member Fox 3. SALUTE
TO THE FLAG a. Council Member Bagdasarian 4. ROLL CALL MOTION I move to allow Vice Mayor Martinez to electronically participate in the January 11, 2022, Town Council Meeting. 5. MINUTES
a. Work Session Minutes of December 13, 2021 b. Regular Session Minutes of December 14, 2021 6. ADOPTING THE MEETING AGENDA (AMENDMENTS AND DELETIONS) 7. CERTIFICATES OF RECOGNITION
8. PRESENTATION OF PROCLAMATIONS 9. PRESENTATIONS 10. REGIONAL COMMISSION REPORTS 11. PETITIONERS 12. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA a. Regional Surface Transportation Program Funding
for the Route 15 Bypass Interchange at Edwards Ferry Road and Fort Evans Road Project RESOLUTION Endorsing a Request in the amount of $2 Million for Regional Surface Transportation
Program Funding from the Northern Virginia Transportation Authority for Fiscal Year 2028 for the Route 15 Bypass Interchange at Edwards Ferry Road and Fort Evans Road Project REVISED(1)
1 -2- b. Requesting Virginia Department of Transportation to Accept Certain Streets RESOLUTION Requesting the Virginia Department of Transportation to Accept Certain Streets c. Appointment
to the Commission on Public Art (Council Member Nacy) RESOLUTION Appointing Leah Fallon to the Commission on Public Art d. Appointment to the Tree Commission (Council Member Cummings)
RESOLUTION Appointing Joseph Garnreiter to the Tree Commission e. Removing Ron Platt from the Tree Commission RESOLUTION Removing Ron Platt from the Tree Commission f. Motion to
Approve the Proclamation for Tuscarora Mill Restaurant Celebrating their 36th Year Business Anniversary (Sponsor Mayor Burk) MOTION I move to approve the Proclamation for Tuscarora
Mill Restaurant 36th Year Business Celebration to be presented on January 18, 2022. g. Procurement Policy Revisions RESOLUTION Adopting Procurement Policy and Design-Build and Construction
Management Procedures h. Amending Resolution 2021-187 - Setting the 2022 Calendar Year Council Calendar to Remove Election Day Conflict RESOLUTION Setting the Calendar Year 2022 Town
Council Meeting Schedule and Authority to Reset the Day or Days to which a Regular Meeting shall be continued in the Event of Inclement Weather 13. RESOLUTIONS / ORDINANCES / MOTIONS
a. Virginia Village – REVISED(1) RESOLUTION Adopting Town Plan Amendment TLTA-2019-0001 to Amend the Planned Land Use Policy Map, the Crescent District Land Use Policy Map, the Crescent
District Building Height Policy Map, and the Crescent District Future Streets Policy Map ORDINANCE Approving TLZM-2019-0001, Virginia Village, to Rezone 18.48 Acres from R22, Multifamily
Residential, CD-MUR, Crescent District – Mixed-Use Residential, CD-CC, Crescent District – Commercial Corridor, and Gateway 2 -3- District (Overlay), to CD-RH, Crescent District – Residential
High Density and CD-CC, Crescent District – Corridor Commercial District RESOLUTION Approving Special Exception TLSE-2020-0004, Virginia Village Floodplain Alteration to Allow the Alteration
of the Floodplain Boundaries in the Northeast Quadrant of the Property along Town Branch b. Motion to Rescind Resolution 2021-154 MOTION I move to rescind Resolution 2021-154 - COVID-19
Vaccination & Testing Program for Town of Leesburg Employees and Appointed Officials adopted on October 12, 2021. 14. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. TLOA-2021-0005, Administrative Approval of
COAs in H-1 Old and Historic District ORDINANCE Amending Zoning Ordinance Article 7.5.6 Administrative Review of Certificates of Appropriateness to Amend the Allowable Projects for
Administrative Review in the Old and Historic District b. TLOA-2021-0001 Batch Zoning Text Amendments ORDINANCE Amending the Town of Leesburg Zoning Ordinance Articles 3, 9, 10, 15,
and 18 as part of the Winter 2021 “Batch” Amendments c. Off-duty Employment of Police Officers ORDINANCE Permitting Town Law Enforcement Officers to Engage in Off-Duty Employment which
may Occasionally Require the Use of their Police Powers in the Performance of Such Employment 15. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 16. NEW BUSINESS 17. COUNCIL DISCLOSURES AND COMMENTS / ADDITIONS
TO FUTURE MEETINGS a. Future Council Meetings and Agenda Topics 18. MAYOR DISCLOSURES AND COMMENTS / ADDITIONS TO FUTURE MEETINGS 19. TOWN MANAGER COMMENTS 3 -4- 20. CLOSED SESSION
a. Leesburg Mobile Park MOTION I move pursuant to Va. Code Section 2.2-3711(A)(8) of the Code of Virginia that the Leesburg Town Council convene in a closed meeting for the purpose
of consulting with legal counsel regarding specific legal matters related to the Leesburg Mobile Park. MOTION In accordance with Section 2.2-3712 of the Code of Virginia, I move that
Council certify to the best of each member’s knowledge, only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements under Virginia Freedom of Information Act and such
public business matters for the purpose identified in the Motion by which the closed meeting was convened were heard, discussed or considered in the meeting by Council. (ROLL CALL VOTE)
b. Land Acquisition MOTION I move pursuant to §§ 2.2-3711(A)(3) of the Code of Virginia that the Leesburg Town Council convene in a closed meeting for the purpose of discussion and
receiving information regarding the potential acquisition of real properties for a public purpose. MOTION In accordance with Section 2.2-3712 of the Code of Virginia, I move that Council
certify to the best of each member’s knowledge, only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements under Virginia Freedom of Information Act and such public
business matters for the purpose identified in the Motion by which the closed meeting was convened were heard, discussed or considered in the meeting by Council. (ROLL CALL VOTE) 21.
ADJOURNMENT ASSISTIVE LISTENING SYSTEM Qualified individuals with a disability who require a reasonable accommodation to attend and/or participate in this meeting should contact the
Clerk of Council at eboeing@leesburgva.gov or 703-771-2733 to request the accommodation. Three days advance notice is requested. Meetings are broadcast live on the Town’s local government
access cable TV channel (Comcast 67 and Verizon 35) and streamed live on the website at www.leesburgva.gov/webcasts. All Town Council, Board and Commission meetings are recorded and
can be found on the Town’s Web site at www.leesburgva.gov. 4 -5- REGULARLY SHEDULED COUNCIL MEETINGS Citizens are invited to attend and participate in Town Council meetings. The petitioner’s
portion of the meeting and scheduled public hearings offer the public two opportunities to present their views to the Council during its meeting. Petitioners The petitioners’ portion
of the Council agenda is the first item taken up by the Council following proclamations and certificates of appreciation. This part of the meeting affords individuals the opportunity
to address the Council on any matter not scheduled for a public hearing. Prior to the meeting, those citizens wishing to speak should sign the Clerk’s Register on the podium at the
front of the Chambers. The Mayor will announce the availability of the sign-up sheet at the beginning of all regular meetings. Petitioners’ presentations should be limited to five
minutes. Public Hearings Certain items of Town business can only be conducted after the Town Council conducts an advertised public hearing. Certain major issues affecting the town’s
government can also be scheduled for public hearing at the option of the Council. Adoption of the town budget, rezonings, special exceptions and amendments to the Town’s subdivision
and zoning ordinances all require a public hearing. Decorum A person addressing the Council as a petitioner, or during a public hearing, should advance to the podium when recognized
by the Mayor and state his or her name and address. Persons should also indicate whether they are representing anyone other than themselves. After the presentation or comments, the
Mayor or members of Council may have questions of the petitioner. Decorum will be maintained. Statements, which are demeaning or defamatory to members of the public, the staff or the
Council, are inappropriate and out of order. OTHER COUNCIL MEETINGS Work Sessions/Committee of the Whole Council may elect to place an item on the Tuesday night meeting agenda for action.
Items will only be added to the agenda if agreed to by a majority of Council present. Closed Sessions Under certain circumstances, the Virginia Freedom of Information Act permits the
Town Council to meet in a session where the public is excluded. This may be a discussion of personnel matters, legal matters, the acquisition or sale of property and other selected
topics. The Council can only go into closed session from a public session and the notice must cite the specific statutory authority to go into closed session and also indicate the general
topic to be discussed. Only those matters in the adopted motion to go into closed session can be discussed at that time. TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA MATERIALS Generally, all items on the regular
Council agenda have been first considered at the Council Committee of the Whole. Individual council members, however, can request full Council action on an item considered, but not
reported out of committee. Materials previously distributed to the Council on Wednesday are available to citizens on request from the Clerk’s Office. Citizens may also provide the Clerk
of Council with an e-mail address or self-addressed, stamped envelopes and Council agendas will be provided to the citizens without further charge. For more information, call the Clerk’s
Office at (703) 771-2733 during normal business hours or e-mail at clerk@leesburgva.gov. Meeting agenda packets are available for public inspection in the lobby of Town Hall on Wednesdays
prior to the scheduled meeting. Council agendas can also be viewed on the town’s World Wide Web site at http://www.leesburgva.gov. 5 Council Work Session
December 13, 2021 1 | P a g e Council Chamber, 25 West Market Street, 7:00 p.m. Mayor Kelly Burk presiding. Council Members Present: Ara Bagdasarian,
Zach Cummings, Suzanne Fox, Vice Mayor Martinez, Kari Nacy, Neil Steinberg, and Mayor Kelly Burk. Council Members Absent: None. Staff Present: Town Manager Kaj Dentler, Town Attorney
Christopher Spera, Deputy Town Manager Keith Markel, Public Works and Capital Projects Director Renee LaFollette, Planning and Zoning Director Susan Berry Hill, Planning and Zoning
Deputy Director Brian Boucher, Economic Development Director Russell Seymour, Plan Review Director Bill Ackman, Management and Budget Officer Cole Fazenbaker, and Clerk of Council
Eileen Boeing. Minutes prepared by Deputy Clerk of Council Corina Alvarez. AGENDA ITEMS 1. Items for Discussion a. TLTA-2019-0001 Virginia Village Town Plan Amendment,
TLZM-20190001 Virginia Village Rezoning, TLSE-2020-0004 Virginia Village Floodplain Alteration Special Exception Mr. Brian Cullen, Founding Principal at Keane Enterprises, gave a presentation
on the Virginia Village development project. Mr. Tushar Awar, Vice President and Principal at Gorove Slade Associates, answered traffic impact questions related to the project. Council,
Mr. Cullen, and staff discussed the item. It was the consensus of Council to move the Virginia Village item to a vote at the January 11, 2022, Council Meeting. 2. Additions to Future
Council Meetings Council Member Steinberg requested a work session discussion for emergency planning should a local power grid emergency occur, specifically in relation to electric
vehicles. It was the consensus of Council to add this item to a future Work Session. 3. Adjournment On a motion by Vice Mayor Martinez, seconded by Council Member Steinberg, the
meeting was adjourned at 9:11 p.m. Clerk of Council 2021_tcwsmin1213 6 Item a. Page 1| December 13, 2021 December 13, 2021 – Town Council Work Session (Note: This is a transcript
prepared by a Town contractor based on the video of the meeting. It may not be entirely accurate. For greater accuracy, we encourage you to review the video of the meeting that is on
the Town’s Web site – www.leesburgva.gov or refer to the approved Council meeting minutes. Council meeting videos are retained for three calendar years after a meeting per Library of
Virginia Records Retention guidelines.) Mayor Kelly Burk: For our discussion tonight, this work session, we will be dealing with one item, which is TLTA-2019-001, Virginia Village Town
Plan Amendments for the Rezoning the Floodplain Alteration, and any other questions that we have in regard to this discussion. We have staff here that can answer some of our questions.
We certainly have lots of staff from the other side here also, that will most certainly be experts and be able to answer our questions. Ms. Fox, I would like to start with you in regard
to what questions do you have in regard to this development, the Virginia Village? Council Member Suzanne Fox: Okay, thank you. Let's see. First of all, I'd like to clarify the Farmers
Market parking. I know I asked that last time, but I want to clarify where that will be. Mayor Burk: The Farmers Market parking? Council Member Fox: Yes. Mayor Burk: Okay. Brian Cullen:
Do you want me to take this one at a time? Council Member Fox: Yes. Mayor Burk: Oh, yes, we're going to have one at a time. Brian Cullen: I have the whole team here. I didn't know what
to expect. Mayor Burk: Okay, that's right. Brian Cullen: We're just going to go for it. Can you pop up that video through my--? I think the best way to explain this is to show you.
Maybe I'll work through parking as well because parking has been an issue. If you don't mind, we'll tie the two together. This one-- Oh, that's not right. Now, that's the video. Now,
I'm sorry, the PowerPoint. Unless someone wants to watch the video. Then I advance it with this. Okay, great. All right, oops. Then the cursor is up and down. Oh, I see. Oh, can I choose
one of those though, or no? Structure parking. Thank you. All right, so this is a big part of this, the key to it. There's 1,396 spaces that serve our multifamily, office, retail, and
restaurants. 1,336 of those are in structure garages and 60 are on-street. The townhouse and stacked townhouse are fully parked with guest parking and on-street parking in the driveways
and garages. By comparison, just by a rough comparison, we're building 1,336 structure parking spaces. In the Town right now there's 1,361. This is coming out funky, but it's between
the three garages, between your garage, that County admin, and the new Downtown garage. This is coming up kind of funny. We're parking our residential, as we've talked about, at the
B-1 rate. Then with the way we parked the commercial, and this gets to the point is, you see that the high demand scenario we have, we looked at our commercial parking, we said, "Okay,
how do we best approximate how much we're going to need for the commercial spaces? We know we have for the residential, and what do we do for the commercial?" We took the high-demand
scenario. Casual dining has a high parking ratio, the sit-down restaurant kind of thing. Fast food has a higher parking ratio, that would be like a Chipotle or something like that.
Then we have retail and other offices consistent in both scenarios. In a high demand, if we had 32K square feet or more than half of our retail as fast food, then we would need 580
spaces. We provided 741 spaces, so we have a surplus in that scenario of 161 spaces. In a low demand, which is probably-- The real answer is probably between these two, but low demand
we 7 Item a. Page 2| December 13, 2021 have 9K square feet of casual dining, 5,5K square feet of fast food, retail 50K, and office remains the same. Here we have 294 spaces surplus.
In our garages, we have surplus, and that can be used for Farmers Market, that could be used for overflow parking for our residential units if our residents want more parking than what
we've assigned them. I'm going to go a step further if I might though because I think it might help answer another question you all have had or I've heard from people. We call these
flex spaces. These spaces are in between what are set aside for commercial and what is dedicated for residential. I'm going to look at a typical-- Well, I could show you this video
if you want. This is the Villages of Leesburg and one of their garages. I think this is what we don't want to do. I would guarantee, and I wasn't driving this fast, this is sped up,
but I guarantee there's some spaces here that have never been parked in. I think that they parked at the B-2 ratio, and they use the shared parking that we use for the commercial. I
think that we don't want to have this condition because building things contributes a lot of carbon to the atmosphere, and once they're built, they're going to stay there. We're trying
to find the right balance. Let me skip onto this because I want to show you a typical garage. Mayor Burk: She asked a question about where's the Farmers Market people going to-- Can
you just give us that answer as to where the Farmer Market people-- Brian Cullen: It's in the garages for A and E. I can give you a better answer to that though if you would give me
a minute. Mayor Burk: I'm sure you're going to have more questions about that, so let's try to keep specific if we can. Council Member Fox: Just to clarify-- Brian Cullen: It'll be
primarily in garages in building A and building E. Council Member Fox: Thank you. Just to clarify, you said high volume. Saturdays are high volume, I would think, for retail, even for
people staying home, so that's going to be high volume for Farmer's Market. You're saying there's going to be enough space for everybody? Brian Cullen: When I was referring to high
volume, I was talking about what I have to park the restaurants at. The staff and the ordinances require I have more parking spaces for fast food. That's the high utilization scenario,
where I had 30K square feet of fast food. That's just how we have to park it. Council Member Fox: I got you. Thank you very much. For staff, tell me how many modifications that the
applicant has proposed. Brian Boucher: 32. Council Member Fox: 32. Brian Boucher: Yes. Council Member Fox: I didn't count them, so thank you for that. I was looking at the staff. Let's
see here, page 23, number 24, modification number 35 TLZO Section 7.10.10. It says here that our zoning plan for non-residential for the Crescent District is a minimum of 40%. The zoning
modification is asking for 20%. Correct? Brian Boucher: Approximately about 21%. Council Member Fox: They're asking to cut commercial space in half? Brian Boucher: Approximately. Yes.
8 Item a. Page 3| December 13, 2021 Council Member Fox: All right. Does staff agree with this? Brian Boucher: Yes. Council Member Fox: Why? Brian Boucher: I'll tell you why. We've
had a lot of applications approved in the Town of Leesburg that have very impressive commercial square footages attached to them. I could go and name a bunch of them, and that square
footage doesn't get built. Name a plan development, or neighborhood retail convenience center we've had one built out of all the plan developments. Some of the larger developments that
have hundreds of thousands of square feet with them, we're getting the townhouse-- Leegate, for example, we're getting the residential first and we get the commercial somewhat later.
What's different here is, by the time this is built out, they will have to have built over half of the commercial that they're proposing. You're asking me why we're favorable to this
draft. That's part of it. The other part is, when you look at what the standard is 40 to 60, it's a pretty aggressive standard square footage-wise. For example, if they had 600K square
feet of residential square footage in this case, they'd need 400K square feet of commercial. With the changes in the office market, with the changes in how retail is being handled,
again, this is a modifiable provision. Staff looks at what we think the environment is today and likely to be in the future. We think that the 40% is a pretty high standard. Again,
you got to have a standard that someone will actually build. When they came and asked for a modification but said they would get at least half of it build-out, will have to be built,
have to be in place. Given the fact of how the retail and office markets are changing, staff believes that the 40% is an unrealistic figure. That if you keep it in there and don't modify
it, you won’t get anybody to use it. Those are some of the reasons why we thought that it was acceptable in this case to drop it to 21%. Council Member Fox: This is part of our zoning
plan, so this is part of our Zoning Ordinance. Brian Boucher: It's in the Zoning Ordinance. Correct. Council Member Fox: We would have to do an amendment to get this? Brian Boucher:
No, the ordinance itself allows this to be modified. Written into the Zoning Ordinance itself was the capability for the Town Council to actually modify that standard if the Council
found it acceptable to do so. We don't need to do an amendment. We can actually use a modification procedure that was written into the ordinance. Council Member Fox: How do we justify
that modification? It says here that the applicant must demonstrate that, number one, the proposed development will contribute to the intended mixed-use character of the area, number
one, and number two, commitments proffered by the applicant justify a decrease in the percentage of non-residential uses. I'm not quite seeing that justification. Brian Boucher: Okay,
if you want me to point [unintelligible]. If you look at buildings A and E, those are true mixed-use buildings. The applicant has to build commercial into them on the ground floor.
These are the two of the big residential buildings, the two biggest residential. We'll call them mixed-use buildings, A and E. We know that they're actually going to build the streetscape
that is there when they build these buildings. They have to. It's not set off in a separate pod that will come sometime later, they have to build that. Again, that's contributing to
the mixed-use. This area is kind of a transition. As you go to the north, it's all residential. If you go to this property into the south, it's all commercial. This is a transitional
area because it's mixing the two. Then when they build D, which is the last of the large residential buildings, it's not mixed-use, 72 units, it's all residential. 9 Item a. Page 4|
December 13, 2021 When they build that, they also have to build a 47K plus square foot purely commercial building. That should be in place. Again, we think that as this builds out,
it will actually exhibit a mixed-use character with both commercial and residential. Council Member Fox: Okay, you're saying this is mixed use, correct? Brian Boucher: Yes. Council
Member Fox: In the staff report, it says residential with some commercial and not mixed-use. Brian Boucher: Well, elsewhere, I do use the term mixed-use I guess they're just-- Forgive
me, but I would call it mixed-use. Council Member Fox: Okay. Now, how many square footage of commercial spaces there right now are being used, occupied at Virginia Village before anything
happens right now? Brian Boucher: The applicant might have a-- Do you have an exact figure now? I don't know what the- Brian Cullen: I don't have the exact figure, but it's around 134K
square feet of a mixture of retail and office. Primarily retail. Council Member Fox: Both retail and office. Okay, great. Let's see here. If I go back to the CDD, and just look at what
it was intended to do, it was actually intended to attract the non-residential uses, but it looks like in phases 1, 2A, and 2B, we have 88% residential and 18% non-residential. Is that
so? Brian Boucher: Yes, that sounds about right. Council Member Fox: Okay. I just wanted to clarify that. Thank you. The other thing I wanted to ask, was about the traffic study. Is
Calvin here? Calvin? Brian Boucher: Calvin is on vacation. His boss gets to show up to talk about this tonight. Council Member Fox: Okay. I just wanted to ask about the traffic study.
I was a little concerned about what I heard about the traffic when this first came into play. I heard that the traffic study took into account Crescent Park, but not the Rogers Farm
development and just the frontage there along King Street and along Catoctin, but in my humble opinion, with what that's worth, we're going to cause some issues down the roads a little
bit with the residential cars that will be parked there now. Going down King Street toward the Bypass and going down Market Street toward the Bypass, I feel like right now, there are
some choke points on Market Street, there's definitely choke points on King Street. Why haven't we asked to help with that? We need help with that, so why haven't we? Renee LaFollette:
With the way the DCSM's written for traffic studies, they are required to take into account 1% background traffic growth in their traffic study. They are not required to take into account
any adjacent development, but at the Town's request, we asked them to take into account Crescent Park, which we know is a densely proposed residential development. We also asked them
to take into account King Street Station, which is also another densely residential area. They did do that at the Town's request. When you look at the background traffic that's included
in the traffic study, it has gone from 1%, which is required by adding those two other developments in, to anywhere between 1.5% to 2%, depending on which section of the roadway. The
other component of the traffic study is our DCSM rules only require that they go to intersections where they have a 15% of their traffic impacts those intersections. They don't have
to study, for example, all the way to the Bypass or beyond the Bypass. They don't necessarily have to go further north than Fairfax Street because of the way the traffic is anticipated
to dissipate with the study. 10 Item a. Page 5| December 13, 2021 Council Member Fox: Is it within the Council's purview to ask for a study that includes those things or is DCSM something
we'd have to adhere to? Renee LaFollette: The DCSM is something that has to be adhered to unless a complete revision is done and approved by the Council for the DCSM. Council Member
Fox: Okay. All right, thank you. Let's see, I guess I have a couple of things for Economic Development. Okay. I just wanted to ask, Russ, years ago, Council was advised that office
space is decreasing in demand. I was wondering if-- I'm hearing conflicting things on that. Could you clarify whether it's increasing, decreasing, what's needed here, things like that?
Russell Seymour: I think the biggest thing we've seen, and we talk a lot about COVID, and the impact it's had, and it has had an enormous impact on retail. That is by far probably one
of the most truest statements I can make with retail. Now, with office space, we've seen a fluctuation between nobody is really looking at these 60K, 80K square feet, high-rise office
spaces. We are seeing though a specific request for, and we're getting more requests, for office and office flex space. We're seeing more requests for that now than we even are for
retail space. Council Member Fox: In terms of square feet, what are we being asked for? Russell Seymour: Well, we're being asked anywhere from the neighborhood of 10K square feet. I'm
giving you numbers per project. It fluctuates anywhere., You have some smaller ones that if they are starting out, companies that are starting out, they're looking for very small spaces.
We have some they're looking in the neighborhood of 10K to 20K square feet. These are projects that we've seen in the last year. We have some that are taking larger spaces than that
when it's available. Council Member Fox: Okay, what class is-- 5K square feet and above is class B office space, correct? Russell Seymour: Well, you can classify it in different areas.
You'd have class A, class B, class C, different office spaces. Typically, when businesses are looking for space, they're looking more along the lines of that class A, class B. Some
will go to class C, but it depends on the type of usage they're looking at. As things have gotten more competitive, I will tell you, you're really looking at, when you start talking
with the State as well as with the County in general, you're starting to look at that A, B office component, if you will. Council Member Fox: How much of that do we have presently in
the Town? Russell Seymour: As of right now, if you're looking for office space, not flex space, but office space, that is 5K square feet or greater, that follows the class A or class
B space. When I say 5K square feet or greater, I'm specifically talking about available space. That, as of right now, according to Costar, and I pulled this the end of last week, you've
got two properties in the Town of Leesburg that will meet that requirement right now. Council Member Fox: Two properties? Russell Seymour: Two properties. Yes, ma'am. Council Member
Fox: If I understand you correctly, you're saying that COVID had an effect on the demand for smaller offices because people are staying put? Russell Seymour: People are moving out of
the heavily congested areas; people are looking to either- There was a big push initially to work from home. That was a big push. We're starting to see now is that companies are saying,
"No, you need to come back into the office." They're varying the different times, but if you look at the demands for space right now, most of them that are office space are looking
in that range that I gave, but you're right, COVID did have an impact on that. That's probably one of the reasons why you see so many coworking spaces coming up right now. The Town,
by far, has more co-working spaces than I have seen in other areas. I think a lot of that has to do with the HUBZone which is extremely important for a lot of those businesses, but
a lot of it has to do 11 Item a. Page 6| December 13, 2021 with the fact that these are spaces that are taking as much square foot. We've got one now that's an existing HUBZone that's
getting ready to add about 8K additional square feet to what they currently have because of demand. Demand is driving a lot of that need. Council Member Fox: Okay. How about the effect
on retail? I know what it was before COVID, especially with online retail. What has been the effect that you've seen in here, in Town on retail? Russell Seymour: Retail was hit before
COVID started. I mean, we think a decline of retail started prior to COVID. That really was dealing with Amazon. When you look at Amazon and you look at the other shop online, people
were getting very used to the fact that they could shop online, hit a button, and it was delivered in a day or two. Now, in many cases, you can get it the same day. It is inherently
speeding that up. If you go over to the new Super Walmart, one of the things that is a good example that I've seen them do, to the far end of the building, they have an entire system
set up for people that order online, come by, and pick it up. They never go into the store. Even we've talking with Walmart's distribution center down south, their focus is converting
a lot of what had been warehouse space to dealing with online uses. The retail market, I think, Brian brought up a really good point. The retail market is suffering. That is only one
component, though, that is suffering. That's been our big issue. Whenever we look at development projects, I will be totally honest, we have requests for space that we cannot fill.
A lot of these development projects that, as Brian mentioned, they're not getting built, a lot of that has been because we have not said, "You have to build what's required." Leegate
is a good example of that. We're dealing with that actually right now. I don't want you to get the impression that the demand is not out there. The demand is there. I'm seeing and I've
spoken with the County as well as the Northern Virginia Regional Economic Development Market. The demand is there. It's just we've got to be able to have something we can put in front
of them that's ready to go. Council Member Fox: Okay. Mayor Burk: It's not Leegate. It's Tuscarora Crossing. Russell Seymour: I'm sorry, Tuscarora Crossing. Yes, ma'am. Council Member
Fox: Would you mind, of course, if my colleagues agree, putting together some sort of information about what's needed right now, what we're getting requests for, what we had had requests
for, what we've had to turn down, things like that? Russell Seymour: Yes, I can. I'll pull, not just from Leesburg, but I'll look at Northern Virginia as a whole, but we'll focus on
Leesburg. Council Member Fox: Okay, thank you so much. Russell Seymour: Yes, ma'am. Mayor Burk: All right, Mr. Bagdasarian? Council Member Ara Bagdasarian: Just some clarification.
When you said flex space, are we talking about flexible use space? Brian Cullen: I'm sorry? Council Member Bagdasarian: When you mentioned flex space for commercial, are you talking
about flexible use space? Brian Cullen: Well, we've been talking about flex space. We are doing some flex space like St. John's property has done. We're doing that out at Oaklawn. I
don't think that is what is anticipated here. We 12 Item a. Page 7| December 13, 2021 do have, in our proffers though, we could use some of our retail space for commercial uses. That
could be flexible office space as well. Council Member Bagdasarian: Obviously, the face of commercial is changing considerably since COVID and there's still behaviors we don't know
are going to last beyond this as a long-term factor. Just a few questions here. I noticed that the Catoctin Circle intersection improvement was originally proffered upfront, and then
now it's going to be issued after the first phase is complete, is that correct? Brian Cullen: No, it has to be completed before I can occupy anything in the first phase. That's what
it proffers. Council Member Bagdasarian: Okay. Brian Boucher: I think if I checked, it's building A. Brian Cullen: Yes, building A. Brian Boucher: You can occupy the townhouses, but
not building A. Before they get the first occupancy permit in building A, they have to have-- Mayor Burk: You're very hard to hear. Could you say that again? Brian Boucher: Oh, sorry.
Mayor Burk: Is your mic? Yes, your mic's on. Okay. Brian Boucher: Yes, it says it's on. I believe what the proffer says is that the Catoctin Circle improvements have to be in place
by the time the first occupancy permit is issued for a unit in building A. Mayor Burk: Building A. The Town has to-- Brian Boucher: They can do the townhouses and stacked townhouses
first which are 81 units. Council Member Bagdasarian: For clarification, what is the justification or thought process behind that? Because I don't know what the impact will be as far
as the construction traffic. Brian Boucher: I will say this, I asked Calvin Grow because once it was proffered sooner, and then that was a change. I spoke with Calvin Grow and said,
"Calvin, does this make sense? Is this going to have a negative impact on Catoctin Circle if those improvements aren't there when we're issued 81 occupancy permits?" Calvin said, "Actually,
no." In his estimation, it would not be. That's when staff said, "Okay, we had no objection to it." Council Member Bagdasarian: Speaking of building A and building E, is the idea to
have the entire first floor be used for commercial space on both those buildings? Brian Boucher: Yes. Council Member Bagdasarian: Okay. Got it. Russell, is he still here? There, there
you are, Russell. Just a couple of economic development questions. Mayor Burk: He's not going anywhere. Council Member Bagdasarian: All right. I know we didn't consult the EDC. I know
that would've been an appropriate move, but just a couple of economic development questions. What is the greatest gap that you're seeing? I know I piggyback off of Council Member Fox's
question. What is the biggest gap that you're seeing as far as commercial space right now? 13 Item a. Page 8| December 13, 2021 Russell Seymour: We have an immediate need right now
for non-retail commercial space. When you look at commercial space, you have to split out non-retail from retail and be able to define that. The retail spaces that we have right now
if you look at some of the existing developments that are out there, that's where you're seeing the vacancy rates. That's where you're seeing a lot of it. You're not seeing it in the
other spaces, or the other types of spaces for the most part, but you're seeing it in the retail market. Building additional retail right now with any project, I think you're seeing
it, should be a concern for any developer or the Town at that point, based on the vacancy rates that we have for that. Quite honestly, based on the trend that has been building for
some time, we are getting requests-- The best way I can put this Council Member Bagdasarian is Economic Development's focus at the end of the day, our mission is to create among other
things, employment opportunities for our citizens. We have to have space in order to be able to bring those types of opportunities in and retail won't do that. We're seeing too much
of our workforce going out. We've talked about in and out commuting, and that's really what is required a lot of it. When you're talking about the space development, you've got to be
able to provide opportunities for that. We've seen it in some areas, and we've seen it in the businesses that are growing right now for us. I don't know if I've addressed your question,
but that's been a big issue for us. Yes, sir. Council Member Bagdasarian: From your perspective, the reduction of a commercial ratio, is that going to make an adverse impact on your
ability to fill space? Russell Seymour: The Town right now, when you look at a lot of the projects that have been out there, we've rezoned a lot of commercial property over the years,
and we've rezoned it for residential. If we continue to rezone property that's designated for commercial space, we're never going to be able to fill a demand. I can only tell you what
demands we're seeing right now, but I can also tell you that I would hope that the Town would be in a position as part of our planning and looking at the future, not just to prepare
for what we're seeing right now, but prepare for what we hope, and what we're seeing and our best guess for the future. I'd like to look at everything, but my job is to look at that
one area and that's been the big impact for us. We've lost too much commercial to residential uses, and that we're just not seeing the other get built right now and that's hurt us.
Council Member Bagdasarian: From your perspective and expertise, where do you see those trends going as far as employment, as far as commercial? Russell Seymour: Well, I think right
now it is a guess. I can only tell you what the State's looking at. I can only tell you what the regional groups are looking at and other economic development offices. The State's seeing
more property, that's going to your main projections right now. They're looking at R&D. They're looking at, obviously government contracting has been a big focus for us here, but then
also technology firms. If you look at those three areas that the State is seeing right now across the board, those three areas make up about 75% plus of all the projects that they're
seeing. Again, now I look at that the State does not look at retail. When I look at it, I look at it as a funnel from the top-down, what's the State seeing, what are the regions seeing
and then what are the localities seeing. Leesburg is in a position with its workforce, with the people that you have here, and with the commitment of the developers that we have. We've
got some really good developers here that are talking about really good projects. I just think it's important that we never forget what we've already lost, what has been rezoned, and
then being able to meet a need that we have right now and a need for the future. Council Member Bagdasarian: Mr. Cullen I've got a question for you. Obviously, when planning this whole
project, you had a target persona in mind for the high-density residential, the 580 units. Who do you envision as being the target market for those apartments? Brian Cullen: What we
see missing in the market right now, and I could show you a slide if you want, but I want to keep it to the point. I think what we see missing in the market is studios and one-bedroom,
14 Item a. Page 9| December 13, 2021 smaller units nominally lower priced. Seventy percent of your product inside the Bypass is two bedroom, three-bedroom product. There's not a single
studio inside the Bypass. The studios you do have are at Country Club and out at the Villages ay Leesburg. We see it being smaller product geared towards working young professionals,
service workers in Town. That's the target we have, and it's a very different target than what exists in the five. There's five major apartment buildings inside the Bypass. The last
one was built in 1988, and again, they're mostly two and three bedrooms and surface parked, not walkable to Downtown. Council Member Bagdasarian: Okay. All right. That's it for now,
thanks. Mayor Burk: Mr. Cummings? Council Member Zach Cummings: Thank you. My pen ran out halfway through, so I had to convert to a computer. Mayor Burk: You can do it. Council Member
Cummings: I know. There are a few economic development questions and fiscal impact questions I had for staff. I know that within the fiscal impact analysis, it gives us a net revenue
generated by the full build-out, excuse me, of this development. What is that number? Brian Boucher: We'll turn it over to somebody from the Economic Development Department. We got
all the experts here tonight. Council Member Cummings: Perfect [unintelligible]. Cole Fazenbaker: The net, which is really looking at the proposed minus what's currently, there is 525K,
approximately. Council Member Cummings: What tax revenue goes into creating that number? Is it food and beverage tax? Cole Fazenbaker: We looked at basically every single revenue line
that the Town gets and attributed the different aspects. It's meals tax, it's real estate, personal property tax, and even sales tax. Essentially, we attributed a factor for every line,
and it's based on averages that we're already seeing. Council Member Cummings: Say that number one more time for me. Speaker 1: That's 735. Cole Fazenbaker: 735 is the total minus the
200 that's currently there to get the 525. Council Member Cummings: To get the net so the 525. Russell, you were talking about-- Heard a lot of talk about commercial space, retail.
Do we have an actual vacancy rate for commercial space in Leesburg you know? Russell Seymour: You've got a vacancy rate that fluctuates depending on what you're looking at. Retail obviously
is much higher, and I can pull those numbers. Again, we're going to pull it based on the data that we have presented to us. I can tell you that the retail number if you look at graphs
and how it shows, the retail number has been steadily increasing as far as vacancy. When we talked to some of the developers that are out there, some of actually development managers
that are overseeing projects, who're overseeing existing commercial spaces, they'll tell you that it's been the retail that's been the suffering point for it not the other types of
uses. Council Member Cummings: Russell, I'm sorry, one point. I look at this as similar to trying to find something to compare the future Virginia Village to, do you have a sense at
Village of Leesburg, what their retail and commercial vacancy would be? 15 Item a. Page 10| December 13, 2021 Russell Seymour: You're talking about the Village of Leesburg, what their
vacancy? Council Member Cummings: Yes. Russell Seymour: I can only tell you from the discussions that we've had with [unintelligible]. We've got three different groups that now manage
that area. You've got one that manages the retail, one that manages office, and one that manages the residential. In discussing it with them, they will tell you that it's their office
space or their non-retail commercial space that has done very well. They've not had any issue with that. I truly think if we'd have been able to keep and build the additional space
that was originally set for that, they will tell you, they probably would've been able to fill that, but that was rezoned to residential, which has not been built yet at this point.
Council Member Cummings: That was supposed to be office space? Russell Seymour: It was supposed to be that non-retail commercial. Council Member Cummings: Thank you. I promise I won't
make you stand back up. I have a few transportation questions for staff. Well, actually this one might be for the applicant as well, sorry. Will you all allow public transportation,
public buses, school buses to enter into the development? Brian Cullen: Of course, yes. We actually have a school bus stop planned in the project. Council Member Cummings: Perfect.
A question for staff, if they can answer again, looking for a comparison for this development. Does the Village at Leesburg allow public transportation to enter into that development?
Renee LaFollette: I believe so. They have one of the Loudoun County fixed-route buses that runs through the Village. Council Member Cummings: I was just curious. I don't know what that
question means. I only have one other area of concern. It's just I want to hear more about the parking. I know you were going into it early on. If you could just walk through, Brian,
how you're, looking to park this because I know, just being in the real estate industry, parking is key for us and its key for folks looking to find a place to live. Do you mind walking
through it briefly for us? Brian Cullen: Yes, if you don't mind just-- Mayor Burk: Now you have the opportunity. Brian Cullen: I'm sorry to jump ahead. I thought it was two birds one
stone there. I use this as an example. This is building A and building A is planned. This is the first apartment building will build is on the left side of Golden High Street. 224 multifamily
units, 25,5K square feet of commercial. We have a total of 496 total parking spaces, 478 in the structure and 24 in the street. Here, again, we're parking our residential units at the
B1 ratio, much like Church & Market did, where we have one unit per studio, one unit, and one and a half for every two bedrooms. The one-bedrooms and studios at one. We need a total
of 251 spaces to accommodate that on 224 units. What we do is we did this high demand as I mentioned, where we have a lot of fast-food retail. In that scenario on the left, we have
a surplus of 96 spaces in this garage after I allocate for commercial and allocate for my residential parked at the B1 ratio. In the low demand, I have 151 spaces. What really, I think,
illustrates this best, and bear with me here because you'll see there's three colors here the commercial is in green, the bluish color is our flex, and the brown is the residential
and that's up top. I'm going to walk through this. This is a low-demand scenario where I have 151 extra spaces. We gate at the top and the residential parking is at the top of the parking
structure. There is access onto the floors of their apartments. It's not like they have to go all the way down. They're not going to cheat to 16 Item a. Page 11| December 13, 2021
go. They're going to go up and they're going to get in their space. They will register that vehicle with us. They will have a fob to get inside that gate. That's how we allocate those
spaces. Then the commercial we want that on the ground floor because it's most convenient for all the commercial users and so that you'll see there's the whole first floor is all green.
Then it actually shows one space on level two which will be allocated by numbers if we go with the low demand. In between there, you have all those blue. We have 151. If we have extra
residential people, we can give them a sticker. They can register their vehicle. We know where they are, but this is a lot of where your Farmers Market parking will go in this flex
area in between the two allocations. This is the high demand. Again, you can see the green gets bigger. It goes all the way. It goes halfway through level two, and then the other half
a level three is still flex. In this scenario, we still have almost 100 flex spaces. There's quite a bit of parking as I mentioned and what we saw at the Villages. Please go look at
that because it's a waste of concrete, frankly a waste of space and not very environmentally friendly. We're trying to get it right. We have the most at risk. Frankly, we have to lease
these units. We have to lease this retail. This is how our parking works in a typical building. As I mentioned earlier A and E both have surplus parking like this to be able to accommodate
the Farmers Market. If I might add one thing on commercial, we all know we have 800K square feet of approved commercial at Oaklawn. We are in the site plan process for some flex buildings
right now. One of the challenges on commercial right now is what a tenant is willing to pay versus the cost to build an office building. Flex buildings work, these buildings work, but
there's a big gap in between construction costs and rents. I'm sure Russell gets a lot of prospects, but down the day I got to make the rent work and that's a challenge I think for
most people in our industry. Mayor Burk: Thank you. Are you done? Okay. Ms. Nacy? Because I still don't recognize. Council Member Kari Nacy: I have a few. Let's start with Brian. You
might not know the answer to some of these off hand but if you just want to email them at some point, I understand because I'm going to ask some questions about applications of our
[unintelligible]. You might just not know it offhand. What is-- Talking about the Villages of Leesburg, what is the mixed-use ratio there versus their parking ratios? Brian Boucher:
I'd have to take a look at that. I can tell you one thing; the Village at Leesburg is the first place we used our shared parking that's in the ordinance. This is a section that allows
you to modify the standard commercial parking based on what they call time-of-day factors and multiple trips. People will go there and maybe go to an office and go to a restaurant.
We did that and it reduced their parking by about 20%. I'll have to get the exact numbers to you. Council Member Nacy: Yes, no, that's fine just for-- Brian Boucher: Yes, but the point
is that they've had something that actually reduced from our standard commercial parking 20%. Council Member Nacy: Yes, and just because that is the closest thing to this application.
I have the same question about parking for Church & Market which was approved. What was the standard that was approved there? It's Downtown, it's similar. Brian Boucher: Yes, Church
& Market actually was able to use the new parking standard. It's the standard that they were asking to use for the residential, the one space per one unit. That's the standard that
they use. Council Member Nacy: When you're coming up with parking requirements or the ordinance, how do you-- Do you combine commercial and residential? What's the math that comes up
with that total? Brian Boucher: When you're trying to figure out what's adequate parking? 17 Item a. Page 12| December 13, 2021 Council Member Nacy: Yes. You put a table in there
but you're going to have to dumb it down a little for me. Brian Boucher: Two things. We have in the ordinance; different uses have different parking standards. The residential, we separate
out. The commercial, we break it down into individual uses. For example, he's mentioning what we call fast food but without a drive-through, quick carry-out. We require one space for
100 square feet for that, so you need 10 spaces for 1K square feet of that type of restaurant. That's pretty substantial. We go through the various uses. Office is one that here is
one for 400 square feet. Literally, you need four spaces for 100 square feet of fast-food carry-out as opposed to office. One thing you see this, he's talking about flex spaces and
this changing. That can be a little confusing. Why that can change is, the way they've written the proffers is, they have flexibility in the commercial uses. They've got 100K and 500
square feet of office. That has to stay. When you get to their other commercial uses, those can change because they want to be able to respond to the market and those uses have different
parking spaces. When he was talking about high densities, scenarios, it's because you have a lot more restaurants and the restaurants under our ordinance require more spaces, so the
parking garages. There's a reason for that and the parking garages have to have those more spaces. That's where you get the various scenarios he's got. He's arguing here that even in
its highest when you have literally half of the non-office commercial is restaurants that he's got a surplus of spaces in the garages. Council Member Nacy: When the Planning Commission
was talking about it, were there concerns geared more towards the residential parking, or was it a combination of just in general parking? Brian Boucher: Again, I would say it was more
the residential was the concern because again there's a modification and it's a decrease in that, so the concern was where those residential-- Those spaces if they weren't there, where
would people park? Brian Cullen: Can I add to that though? We didn't go through this. I'd take fault for not explaining that better. We simply focus on the residential but the commercial
and the residential together is what gives us a surplus. That's where we have the flex. Brian Boucher: There is the point, the Planning Commission did not see this breakdown in this
way. Council Member Nacy: Density I know was another concern from Planning Commission. Could you walk me through that, please too. I was looking at the chart and the table and the square
acres but then I realized, which I didn't know before, that the floodplain portion is not able to be included in that. Could you just talk about that briefly? Brian Boucher: We have
different rules for calculating density. If you took the site overall, if you just took the 18 and roughly 18.5 acres, it's about 35 units per acre if you just took the residential
and there's commercial mixed in there. What we do is, when you've got a residential zoning district and one of those is the CDCC, that's the one that has the apartments and condos in
it. That's roughly 13-plus acres. If you just took that acreage and did a density calculation, it's about 41 units per acre in there, buildings A, E, D, but we have to cut out the floodplain
and the steep slopes. Here, you've got floodplain and steep slopes that amount to about three acres. You take that out and it reduces it to a little over 10 acres. Then we take the--
In this case, for the apartment, it's 562 when you do the math, and you get 53.7 units per acre. Again, if you are able to count the floodplain because that's open space for them, but
you can't put it in residential density, it would drop it to 41 units per acre. Council Member Nacy: By right is 24? Brian Boucher: By right is 24. 18 Item a. Page 13| December 13,
2021 Council Member Nacy: Can you talk about the setbacks off Catoctin? I know there have been some concerns raised about it feeling massive. What are the setbacks from the road? What's
it going to really feel like? How much room is there? Brian Boucher: What it feels like will probably be different for different people, but what the Crescent Design District has in
it is it allows buildings up to 70-feet in height by right in this area. They wanted them somewhat close to the road to give that a sense of a more urban area, but you also have wide
sidewalks. Here, you have a tree panel that's about seven feet, then you have a nine-foot minimum sidewalk. You're pushing it back and giving people room to walk. Here, you'll notice
was one of the modifications. We want street trees out in that tree panel. That's right up on Catoctin. It turns out, because the road curves, we have to meet VDOT site distance requirements.
We always apply them to everybody. When you do that, it knocks out a lot of the trees. It's like a vector from the intersection. You can't have anything taller than three feet. The
applicant in this case asked for a modification to move the trees farther back. Along portions of Catoctin, particularly where Fairfax Street comes around, they've got a little entry
park, the buildings are actually moved farther back from the road so that they can accommodate those trees. Staff still thought a presence of trees on Catoctin Circle was important
to break up the buildings and to get some green space. They did that, and it pushes in many areas, the buildings farther back, which might reduce the feeling when you're coming in there
of something coming into something very different compared to most of Leesburg. Council Member Nacy: Yes. Since you mentioned heights, I've got that on my list. Can you talk a little
bit about heights? It might be helpful, I think you have a slide that shows potentially a visual, but my question's-- Yes. My question is you said the by right is 70? Brian Boucher:
70 feet. Yes. Council Member Nacy: My question is, what are these? I know that property especially off Catoctin tapers off a little bit. Then comparatively speaking, and you might not
know this offhand again, how tall are Church & Market and the condos? King Street Station, I think they might be called. How tall are those two? I'm just trying to visualize what it
might look like in person. Brian Boucher: He's got a slide that actually goes down. These would be at about approximately 61 feet. He can show you. The condos right down on King Street
are 55 feet at the top. Church & Market goes up to 65 feet, I believe, because we'd amended the ordinance in certain places of Town to allow you to go higher, and even in the Historic
District then. It's 65. Then you've got the County building, which is the biggest building in Town, the tallest. It's over 80 feet, maybe 88 feet. Brian Cullen: These are our heights
here. This is Church & Market. Sorry, the first ones are. This is Church & Market on Church Street face. There's the County office building, which is 72 at best in that location and
76 off at Harrison. This is the King Street Station, which is 55-10. We're all 10 feet. Council Member Nacy: That's it, thank you. It's just nice to have something that's already built
to visualize what these heights would look like. Thank you. I appreciate that. Fairfax Street, right now, that feeds all the way through. What happens to that in this? Does it keep
going all the way through? Brian Cullen: Yes, just go to site imagery on one. Okay. Fairfax, you can see the existing-- I don't know if there's a pointer, is there? How does that thing
work? Anyway, so you could see Fairfax coming in by that used car dealership. Fairfax and High Street are dictated, by the way, in the Crescent Design District. Those locations were
fixed before we got this. Then the Fairfax continues on and goes around the corner, and the point where it hits Catoctin Circle, that was determined between VDOT and transportation,
a safe distance between Harrison and High Street. It really defined the land base as was the transportation network both on the Crescent Design District, then the connection point of
high street or- excuse me- Fairfax Street to Catoctin. Council Member Nacy: Thank you. Then I think this might be for Economic Development. 19 Item a. Page 14| December 13, 2021 Russell
Seymour: Yes, ma'am. Council Member Nacy: When you talk about non-retail versus retail, are restaurants included as retail- Russell Seymour: Yes, ma'am. Council Member Nacy: -when you
talk about non-retail versus retail does that? Russell Seymour: Yes, those would be retail. Council Member Nacy: The HUBZone. I think it's something that is overlooked as being a huge
value, especially in this particular application, because I believe this entire area is considered the HUBZone. Russell Seymour: Yes, ma'am. Council Member Nacy: When you talk about
the things that people are looking for right now the office space and that sort of thing, the HUBZone being that there's only certain areas right around here that are made HUBZone and
then you have to have a certain percentage of your workforce that lives within the HUBZone as well, right? Russell Seymour: There's some flexibilities within a HUBZone. There was a
change not too long ago that gives them some flexibility, so they don't have to live, all of them, in one HUBZone, but they have to be in a HUBZone. Council Member Nacy: We just went
through the whole thing where we eliminated-- With the Mason Enterprise Center, would anything that happened there be easily moved into this area with the office space that's being
provided? Russell Seymour: The HUBZone in general is-- In understanding where the HUBZone what it's supposed to do and why we have it, but I look at it as it's an asset. It's something
that the Town that is an attraction for a lot of those types of businesses. If you look at the majority of the businesses that are in the HUBZone, they typically are your government
contractors, your tech firms, companies that have contracts with the government that allow them to work with that. Absolutely. A request came in actually the end of last week for a
project that was looking for 10K square feet, had to be in a HUBZone. We are putting together everything we can to try to match that in some form. There is still great demand for that
and that's also one of the reasons why we have-- I think there's, depending on who you talk to, between five and seven different co-working spaces in that HUBZone area is for that reason.
Council Member Nacy: I think it's one of those things where-- I don't want to say guaranteed work for companies that participate and companies that go through the process to become
a HUBZone designated company, but you don't have to compete the same way other government contracts compete for work. There's a set aside where you're basically always going to have
some amount of work that makes it valuable to go after it and become a HUBZone company. Russell Seymour: Best way I can describe is think of a point scale when you submit something
if you are in a HUBZone, some contracts will require you to have a HUBZone company. Some won't, but some will also give you additional opportunities, if you will, if you are within
a HUBZone. The other thing that you see is not just the companies themselves, but if you had a small firm that was in a HUBZone that specialized in one particular thing, a larger government
or a larger provider might partner with you, because you're in a HUBZone that gives them what they need, and it gives you a part of that contract. Council Member Nacy: From that perspective,
just in general when large companies say like Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin those companies have in a lot of contracts that they win a required amount of small business set aside
work that they have to subcontract. Russell Seymour: Yes, ma'am. Council Member Nacy: I think it's something that we need to maybe talk about more in this area. It's a huge opportunity
especially when you've got something like this that provides potentially both office 20 Item a. Page 15| December 13, 2021 space and living space for the HUBZone. Sorry, that was
more of just a conversation than a question. I think that's it. Mayor Burk: Mr. Martinez? Vice Mayor Fernando “Marty” Martinez: The irony here is 20 years ago, one of my first developments
was Keane Enterprises in Oaklawn. The difference in office space versus then and there has changed dramatically and versus shared space. Can you define exactly what you mean by shared
office space? Mayor Burk: Are you asking-- Vice Mayor Martinez: I'm asking Brian. Mayor Burk: Brian or-- Brian Boucher: Are you talking about flex space? Vice Mayor Martinez: Yes. Brian
Boucher: It's essentially a workspace that can be modified to a number of different users, as opposed to traditional office space. It's got all these walls, things cut up maybe into
small offices. It's space that you can use and can adapt it to different things. Vice Mayor Martinez: I know that before I retired, we were using shared office space, which meant that
two days a week you were gone, and then the other two days, you came in and shared it with somebody else. Then the fifth day you all got together and fought for a desk. I think that
needs to be talked a little bit about. You talked about retail versus non-retail use. What is a non-retail use? Brian Boucher: Office. Russell might have something different in mind.
The way again, we split up commercial uses based on parking. Non-retail could be office use. It could be some type of commercial rec, use, et cetera Vice Mayor Martinez: In other words,
a non-retail is essential, anything that's not retail. Brian Boucher: You're not walking in there and buying something off of the-- Vice Mayor Martinez: One of the things that I'm concerned
with when we talk about non-retail use, is that, in this area, we talked about the shortage of retail space. Somewhere, there's got to be some nonretail use, that can generate people
coming to and then supporting the retail that is already there. In the past, it was office space. We had enough office space, and people always coming and going and the retail there
could support that. Then when the office people left, then the residents would come in and use the restaurants and use the shops and all that. My concern is that if we're going to convert
some of that to non-retail, we really define what we want to put there that can help support the retail spaces. Make any sense to you? Brian Cullen: It does, but I think that the number
one thing that supports the retail space, though, is residential. I think when you look at the impact that Crescent Place has had on Downtown retail, it's been pretty astounding, because
people come up to it. Vice Mayor Martinez: I'm not denying that. I'm more talking about when we talk about your regular business hours, not evenings and weekends. That's a whole different
dynamic. We're talking about retail space or non-retail space. We're talking about how it can support our businesses during the day, and be- no matter what, the evenings or weekends,
bring at least it's a baseline for the businesses to be supported. Renee, talking about traffic, I know this is a stretch a little bit. What's that development right there off of the
dog park where the dog park used to be. Renee LaFollette: Crescent Park. 21 Item a. Page 16| December 13, 2021 Vice Mayor Martinez: Crescent Park. Word is their entrance goes through
that one development, but it also comes off of to King Street, correct? Renee LaFollette: Correct. Davis Drive will extend through and connect to Gateway Drive. Vice Mayor Martinez:
In a traffic impact, that's not going to have any impact on what we're doing today or doing with Virginia village. Renee LaFollette: Crescent Park background traffic was included in
this with the King Street corridor, because of those impacts. Vice Mayor Martinez: Now here's the stretch. VDOT has right of ways from the end of the Greenway into Leesburg all the
way to Harrison Street, is it or is it all the way to Catoctin? Renee LaFollette: They don't have a right of way from the Greenway to Catoctin Circle. That was a reservation as part
of the Crescent Park approval. There's a width of reservation there, but it's not technically right of away. Vice Mayor Martinez: Even though I think VDOT has given up on that, you
never know sometimes when that can happen and my concern is that if it ever does happen or if we don't do something to protect that from happening, you're going to have a lot of more
traffic coming off on Catoctin, and that would be something that would concern me with this development. Just food for thought, I guess. Renee LaFollette: That’s traffic that at this
point, there's no way to know what that would be or how that would truly impact Catoctin Circle, nor do we have a mechanism to force them to take that into consideration in their traffic
studies. Vice Mayor Martinez: Could Crescent Place ever try to use a use Catoctin that reservation as a way to get out of the development or those office spaces and buildings? Renee
LaFollette: I don't believe so that reservation was made straight through from the Greenway to Harrison Street without a connection to Davis. Vice Mayor Martinez: Okay, just wanted
to make sure. Thank you. Mayor Burk: Are you talking about Crescent Place or Crescent Park? Renee LaFollette: That's Crescent Park. Mayor Burk: He said, "Place," and I heard him say--
Renee LaFollette: Yes, he said Place. It's Crescent Park. Vice Mayor Martinez: Let me go on some questions that I got from my planning commissioner. She wants them to make sure that
the proffers, that the garage spaces in the Town, and two by twos are to be used for parking only. Any other uses like storage, et cetera, should not happen. Brian Boucher: That's one
of our standard things. I thought it was in there. Let me take a look. It's usually something that they have to put in their HOA docks, so these spaces don't become storage areas. Vice
Mayor Martinez: Right. If a resident wants to store something in his parking spot, it's forbidden? Brian Boucher: Yes. Vice Mayor Martinez: Essentially, okay. Just want to make sure
that happens. On the parking on enclosed decks, can they park a motorcycle in front of a car and in its space and still leave space for the traffic lane? Is that going to be allowable?
22 Item a. Page 17| December 13, 2021 Brian Boucher: You mean putting a motorcycle and a car in the same space? Vice Mayor Martinez: Right. In other words, you got a small car, and
you move it up to the wall and then you put your motorcycle in front of it. Is that allowed? Brian Boucher: If it was in a garage space, we're not going to-- That's the type of thing
we don't allow. It's one vehicle, one space. Vice Mayor Martinez: No matter what the size of the vehicle is. Brian Boucher: Yes, I've seen motorcycles parked side by side in spaces
before. Vice Mayor Martinez: That was another concern that- just want to make sure that it's there. Then the other question is, are the parking spaces going be wide enough park a dual
axle truck? In other words, can they handle the big trucks or big, big SUVs? Brian Cullen: I don't know what that width is. They're nine-foot spaces. I don't know what a dual is. Brian
Boucher: Interestingly enough, we have our Town garage, which has a narrower spaces. It was built once upon a time. Our requirements to the ordinance for new garages are for a wider
space than we actually have here. Mayor Burk: That's a problem. Brian Boucher: Yes, I think that's why the ordinance was created. Vice Mayor Martinez: The point I think might be made
is that, because there are going to be people having those wide vehicles that you might have a section in each garage that are for those only. People have an opportunity to park there
instead of crowding in, and then when you go to park next to it, you don't have a door you can get out of. You have to crawl out a window. You know what I mean? That is something that
we're concerned about. Again, spaces in the development with trucks that don't fit in the deck, is there going to be spaces on the street where they could park? Brian Cullen: I answered
these questions with her specifically. I don't think we could accommodate every type of vehicle. There’s just geometrics to make it very challenging. We would not lease to somebody
that needed that space and we wouldn't reserve a parking space on the street. It wouldn't be fair to the rest of the public. Vice Mayor Martinez: Then on proffer 20, how does-- You
talked her through on this? Brian Cullen: On 20? Vice Mayor Martinez: On proffer 20, just how does the parking get altered either up or down by the applicant without the need for an
amendment of his concept plan? Maybe that's Brian's Boucher's-- Brian Boucher: Sorry, I was actually looking, because I was still interested in did we address the “you cannot put storage
in your garage.” I always looking for that. Sorry, could you repeat the question? Vice Mayor Martinez: Can the applicant without the need of an amendment to the concept plan get parking
altered, like maybe the widths? He has to go through an amendment change? Brian Boucher: Yes. They'd have two difficulties here. If they have an approved concept plan, we would have
to change our standard through the zoning. First, we'd have to change our standard through the zoning ordinance is to allow narrower, and then they would have to amend their rezoning
to get that narrower width. Vice Mayor Martinez: Those questions are answered. I don't think I made any-- Oh, Madison Court. I'm hoping that stays a court. 23 Item a. Page 18| December
13, 2021 Brian Cullen: No, the Crescent Design District master plan requires a connection. Vice Mayor Martinez: People can drive through Madison Court from that development and increase
traffic on that street. Brian Cullen: That was all factored in our traffic site, but then again, that was in the plan that we had to accommodate. Vice Mayor Martinez: Well, I looked
at that. I was hoping that somehow, we could keep Madison Court a court, but it's not a showstopper. I just feel for those residents that are going to have increased traffic down that
street when they've had a cul-de-sac. Brian Cullen: I'll just say that we've met with that neighborhood on three different occasions, and we didn't hear that concern, surprisingly,
frankly. Vice Mayor Martinez: Well, that's good that you talked to them. That was one of my other concerns. Brian Cullen: We had seven meetings with the neighborhoods in the area. Vice
Mayor Martinez: One more comment. I'm going to physical therapy for my back. I was coming out of there and there were these two women in the lobby as I was leaving. They stopped me
and told me that I should support Virginia Village, because they thought it was a great application. That it has its issues. They don't like the size, the [unintelligible], but they
think that it's something that Leesburg needs to have. I told her I definitely would take their comments in consideration. Thank you. Mayor Burk: Mr. Steinberg? Council Member Neil
Steinberg: Thank you Mayor Burk. Just real quick, while I'm looking at this map, is this connection from the townhouses into Madison Square, that's a pedestrian connection of some sort?
Brian Cullen: Yes. It's vehicular and pedestrian. Council Member Steinberg: Thanks. Question for Renee, real quick on-- Hard to believe that we're so concerned with parking and traffic.
I understand you have to follow the CSM guidance. Why 1%? Where does that figure come from when you talk about annual increase? Renee LaFollette: I'm going to have to turn and ask Tushar
for that, because that's out of my wheelhouse. Tushar Awar: Tushar Awar with Gorove Slade Associates. We prepared the traffic impacts study. Before we prepared the study, we sit down
with Town transportation staff and VDOT to identify the parameters that would go into the study. One of the things we look at is the COG model forecasts, which are long-term forecasts
for the area based on the planned land use in the area. That shows approximately a 1% growth throughout the area. That's how we look at-- That's how we decide on that 1%. In addition
to that, we also take into account the trips from developments that are approved, but not in place yet. That's how Crescent Park and the King Street residential traffic was added onto
the network. It's 1% plus traffic that's anticipated from these other developments. It turns out to be approximately 1.5% growth in traffic. Council Member Steinberg: When you say for
the area, are we talking about basically within proximity to this development or are we talking about the Town of Leesburg? Tushar Awar: It's in proximity to the development. Council
Member Steinberg: To the development. Thanks. I think that's all. I'm fairly certain the rest of my questions are going to be for the applicant or someone in this team. Real quick on
parking. The 24 Item a. Page 19| December 13, 2021 amount of parking in and of itself doesn't concern me. I'm more interested in how you're going to manage the resource. Why won't
the residents simply start occupying available parking in the garage is that they're not assigned to. Brian Cullen: Great question. When we lease an apartment, they register a vehicle
or two vehicles. They will have spaces allocated inside the gate. Did you do see the gate I showed on there that-- You have the levels behind the gate. They have a fob, and that's secure.
That's an advantage to them. The rest of the community is not in there, but we have their license plate numbers, and we know what they are, and we will be policing that. If we decide
that they could have another space in the flex area, it might be limited by hours, number one, but they'll have a window sticker that identifies them as parkers or tenants of ours that
are parking in the flex spaces. Council Member Steinberg: I appreciate that they will be registered for their registered parking space, but it's obvious someone can have a vehicle-
and this takes you back to the Farmers Market. They can have a vehicle, obviously, they don't register. What prevents them from simply parking it in a noncontrolled space and leaving
it there? Brian Cullen: I think that's us monitoring the garage. I've said this to others, that my bigger fear is having people park in a garage who aren't part of our community, frankly,
because I think we're going to have that availability. Council Member Steinberg: I'm sorry, people who are? Brian Cullen: People who might be in the neighborhood who want to leave a
car or commuter. Commuter parking is a problem. Where people-- Where we just-- We have a commuter problem right now in Virginia Village where if you -- Council Member Steinberg: I’m
sure. Brian Cullen: -- go there during the day, you see a bunch of cars, and they're gone at five o'clock. We'll monitor that garage. We will be managing these buildings and these apartments,
and so we'll monitor that. If we have a license plate that's repeatedly doing that, then they get fined. Council Member Steinberg: Because I was wondering if you're going to be, at
some point, forced to turn to a validated parking situation where people who are doing business within the complex, get parking validated. I know that starts to become maybe more than
you're looking for. Especially in the context of Farmers Market, especially when you have so many people coming to the site for the three hours, I can see that that's when you would
probably have the greatest pressure on the available parking. Brian Cullen: On the flex, it certainly will, but the retail. I'll remind you too if you look at how big of an area the
Farmers Market takes of our footprint or existing footprint and then you look at the number of spaces that are over in that phase, what we call phase two in front of like 32 Catoctin
and behind the Wells Fargo, that's all the parking that really gets used for the Farmers Market. I could count those spaces, but I guarantee it's under 100. Somehow, it's working during
the day, but the Farmers Market is taking a lot of our parking on a regular Saturday if you look at it that way. Council Member Steinberg: Fair enough. Now, since this is a heavily
residential project, and we know what the trends are today, people pick up the phone and they call GrubHub or somebody. I suspect, given the number of residential units, you'll be faced
with a lot of short-term delivery. Will there be dedicated parking for short-term delivery for that type [unintelligible]. Brian Cullen: It's a really good question. I would tell you
that I don't know exactly how that's going to work at the moment. Where was I today? I was somewhere in a similar, mixed-use environment like this, and they have now striped out some
of the on-street parking for delivery only. We may have some of that at some point. I think that's all TBD how that world is working. I feel like that if we have good offerings here
it's not too hard to get on the elevator and walk cross street to get your food. Council Member Steinberg: Understood. 25 Item a. Page 20| December 13, 2021 Brian Cullen: If we're
sitting in the middle of nowhere, I think it'd be a lot more difficult. Council Member Steinberg: Well, I'm not sure I accept that premise, but we'll find out. Now these are going to
come in no particular order. Can you explain proffer number three, and exactly how that works? This has to do with reallocating space from one building into another. I'm not clear on
how you manage that. Brian Cullen: I haven't looked at this in a while, Brian. Council Member Steinberg: Well, it says you can take 10% from one building and reallocate it into another,
but you can't raise the height. I'm not clear on it. That's what I'm asking you for an explanation. Brian Cullen: I'm going to try the Cliffs Notes version, you chime in. I think that
the thought was is that we haven't completely engineered everything. We've taken these buildings a long way in terms of the design. Much further than I ever have, frankly. If we were
unable to fit, like X units in building A, we could move some of those in the building E, but not if we were making the building a bit taller or more mass and the parking has to work.
That is essentially what the thought process was. I would tell you, I haven't looked at that proffer or talked about that proffer in over a year and a half. It might flow might be,
because so many things have become so much more locked down that I'm not sure I have that- we're going to have a lot of flexibility, frankly. Council Member Steinberg: Okay. Brian Boucher:
I'll just say it was originally more than 10%, but it got discussed, and it's been a while. The buildings have come a long way. Literally, it was if they decided that they wanted to
put 10%, let's say, in building A space somewhere on the ground floor that wasn't allocated there, they could do that without having to come back to get a concept plan or proffer amendment.
They can't convert commercial space to residential space, you can't do that, you still got to have it. It's just they wanted to give themselves a little flexibility in the final design
to move some of that commercial square footage around. We thought 10% was doable without having a major impact on any of the buildings. Council Member Steinberg: Okay, thanks. High
Street Park, which is delivered after basically all of phase one, which includes the townhomes 2 over 2s in building A and the 145th unit in Building E. Why is 145 the magic number
for High Street Park? Why not the 50th building or the 10th unit, why 145? Before we get High Street Park, because, as you might imagine, the amenities are of great concern not only
to us, but the residents and, non-residents alike. How did we get there? Brian Cullen: Well, I would say there's probably a back and forth, because that probably started at zero, and
Brian's price started at the whole building or vice versa. We've had a lot of that back and forth. I think at the end of the day, what we needed to make sure is that we had the ability
to build it, but not hamstring our ability to lease some of the space as we're building the building. Because we won't get occupancies on every floor right away. We'll get occupancies
by floor, by unit. It just gave us a window. Let's say by way of example, let's say I start leasing at this time of year right now, and I can't get grass to grow, I can't finish it,
it just gives us that window of time to complete it. It's not it's around half the building. There's a big incentive for us to get it done. Much like- I'll bring it up while we're talking
about it- the commitment that we have in Building D that staff pushed us hard on, I got to build the whole building, and I can only sell half a Building D. It's going until I have Ours
Overlook and the bridge built. That's a really tough financing hurdle for me to go to a bank, and they're going to say, "Okay, I'm going to lend you all this money, but you can only
sell half of it until that's built." We will have to get these things done. We went back and forth a lot with the staff. I credit staff for- they've got a pretty tight box on both of
these. Council Member Steinberg: Well, and since you brought that up, because you and I had a discussion about that. I'm aware that you have to complete all the infrastructure along
Tuscarora Creek before you can build either Building C or D. Brian Cullen: Right. 26 Item a. Page 21| December 13, 2021 Council Member Steinberg: Again, Ours Overlook is in the minds
of many, the crown jewel of this project. The question could be reasonably asked, even if you just built the shell of Building C, which I understand you have construction issues and
staging and all of that, but even if you got the exterior of C done and then when after Ours Overlook, why couldn't we do that? Brian Cullen: My fear, if I did that, would be when I
am building Building C, the shell or whatever, if I built the shell then I'd lease the building. If I'm building the foundation, which is the requirement to get that piece going, if
you recall, the retaining walls and the foundation of those buildings, I worry about having to close Ours Overlook for safety reasons. I also think if I accelerate-- I got some slides
if you want me to go through this. Council Member Steinberg: That's okay. Brian Cullen: If I built Building D, Building C, Ours Overlook first, that would keep me from building Building
E. Now I've got people coming into a construction site between Building D and Building E. We think getting High Street Park done moving the Farmers Market there permanently and then
moving around there is the most logical way to do it. I know we invited this by putting the bridge on there. If I had just had Ours Overlook as a park and I didn't have the bridge,
I wouldn't be having this conversation now. I said before, I almost wish I'd never have done it, but it's a cool feature. We want to build it as well. Council Member Steinberg: I agree.
Brian Cullen: There is some logic to how we're building it, and there is some financial considerations we have to be aware of too. Council Member Steinberg: Well, I appreciate the financial
consideration. I'll be the first to admit this is not my field of expertise, but in the end, sometimes it seems the community will take a backseat to a project and all various considerations,
and you would hope that if the investors and you and everyone else have confidence in this project overall, and as you said, you wish you hadn't offered it, but you did. I'm glad you
did. It's a great feature. There's no question about it. Obviously, the sooner it can happen, I think everyone would just be pleased, because that is the true connectivity of this project
everywhere else, I think a good portion of the Town, so I recognize there are difficulties. Brian Cullen: I totally agree with Councilman, because if you think of that from my standpoint,
doesn't that just enhance the value of everything I'm doing on leasing or whatever? That's the connection we want to make. Council Member Steinberg: Okay. Let's see. Okay. Within the
packet, you are entitled to alter the number of residential units. You could redesign and maybe have several more two bedrooms as opposed to the number of one-bedrooms. But the ADU
units required, and I'll ask about that number in a second are based on the number of units we're seeing now, what I want to know is if you redesign the interior of the building to
what presumably would be fewer units that you're redesigning for larger units, does that affect the number of ADUs overall? Because it's 5%? Brian Cullen: Well, if your question is,
if my gross number units go down 5%, yields less units, your concern that I'll build less ADUs, Council Member Steinberg: Yes. Brian Cullen: I'm willing to commit to the number ADUs
here, even if I build less units. Council Member Steinberg: That's good to know, and the 5%, is that-- This is a question for staff. Is that a Leesburg number, 5%? Because I think the
County runs a bit higher, and I understand this is a complex issue, but if I understand correctly, does it cost the developer since the units are subsidized anyway, why can't the number
be higher as opposed to 5%? What's the cost to you as an applicant? Brian Cullen: Well, I can tell you that in any of the townhouse sections, 27 Item a. Page 22| December 13, 2021
Council Member Steinberg: Not the townhouse. I'm just talking about the apartments. Brian Cullen: Yes, they're part of it, and in that scenario, I'm developing a lot that I will get
no revenue for. Council Member Steinberg: You-- I'm sorry, you're-- Brian Cullen: The [unintelligible] unit, and the builder's probably losing some money on it too. That's the way it's
worked traditionally, in Loudoun, and that's the model. In the apartments, I can't speak as clearly to it, because we haven't done the ADUs in the apartments, but you are- we are the
developers subsidizing them in the market for sure. Council Member Steinberg: Okay, but you are willing to commit to the original number. Brian Cullen: I'll stick with the number if
that's your concern. Council Member Steinberg: Appreciate that. All right. Brian Boucher: That would take, just a slight change, I think in the language of the proffer, just saying,
because it was just based on the total number of units you build. Council Member Steinberg: Thank you. Now, I know, we haven't seen final renderings or anything. The facades of these
buildings that we've seen are all drawings. Nevertheless, Building A doesn't seem as quite as interesting or compelling as Building E, for example. Maybe it has to do with the fact
that the building is white and gray, and the Building A is so much red brick, but there also seems to be less overall exterior design on Building A. It seems to be simpler now. Is what
we're seeing a design as it will be, or might we expect to see something come down the road? Brian Cullen: No, we're committed, and we did spend a good deal of time playing fish on
this as well, and I would tell you that we made changes to both the buildings at the Planning Commission level. I think that the-- I think one of the things that we wanted to do is
not have two buildings with same materials. We broke it up as much as we could, and I think that there were changes made to both buildings, A and E with window types, with the cornice
depth, with coloration on the top floors to try and drop the back a little bit. I think, it's really hard to see these things in two-dimension. We do have a SketchUp model, as we call
it here, that we could run that would give you a better sense of what that architecture looks like if you're interested in it. We also have a flyby for this if you wanted to see that,
but really, we got into it in pretty good detail at the Planning Commission and made a number of changes to the architecture to reflect concerns that they had, but I would just stress
that the two-dimensional plans and two-dimensional pictures just don't do it justice. Council Member Steinberg: Okay. I would also offer that the two-over-twos in contrast to the townhomes
also seem to be a bit more plain, and less well designed, which often seems to be the case with two-over-twos, honestly. I'm not sure what there is to be done about that. Is this architecture
I'm sure it's not four-sided. Who sees the side of the building that, are they back-to-back? Brian Boucher: On the apartment buildings, they are basically four-sided. Council Member
Steinberg: Yes. I'm talking about the townhouse. Brian Boucher: On the townhomes, we've wrapped the ends. Remember our alleys- the alleys that- the two parallel alleys on the right
and left. Again, a long conversation with staff over a course [inaudible] You see that where it says private road C or private road B? Is that B? Yes, right there. Those are back-to-back,
those are the rears. Thank you. Those are the rear of those units, but each of the first units will be wrapped around the corner. Then the middle ones, we'll just have Hardie plank.
It's not vinyl. It's Hardie plank. Council Member Steinberg: I think-- Let me just look. This is a complete nerd question, and it has to do with the floodplain. There was a mention
made about the metric for floodplain water surface rising 28 Item a. Page 23| December 13, 2021 litigation. When does that become known? Because it says in there that not sure what
it is. When do you know what it is? I don't know who that's a question for. Brian Cullen: That's not me. Council Member Steinberg: I know, that's a strange question. Brian Cullen: I'd
be corrected if I stood up there. William Ackman: Before any construction is allowed, they would do a base floodplain study. That sets it and that says it's elevation 10. Actually,
before they go to construction, they model what it's going to look like. It better be at 10 or below. It can't be 10.0001. It's 10.0000. It matches exactly. We'll look at it with my
staff, and we'll also send it to FEMA. It'll be verified and re-verified. Council Member Steinberg: Thank you. That's all I have for now. Thank you. William Ackman: Once it's built,
they have to as built it and come back through us to verify what they said they were going to do before construction, they actually did with construction. Again, if it doesn't match,
before they can get occupancy, they have to do whatever site improvements they need to do in order to accommodate the 10.0000. Council Member Steinberg: Thanks. Mayor Burk: I'm next
here. I wrote a list of pros and cons. I went through the whole thing, and I said, "What do I like about it? What do I do not like about it? I'll go through it. First off, I do have
to ask a clarifying question, Brian, on proffer 20. I'm confused by the information you gave, because you said that there is no flexibility, so I'm confused. Could you clarify that
for me? Brian Boucher: When you say proffer 20, which-- Just to make sure. Brian Cullen: Transportation, parking. Mayor Burk: The parking in regard to-- Brian Boucher: [Unintelligible]
parking and accountability. Your question is-- Mayor Burk: I didn't understand your answer to the other Council member. What is 20, so I can have a better understanding. Brian Boucher:
Let me take a look. Yes. What the developer did not want to do was say, particularly for the commercial, that I must provide a certain amount of spaces. Then the commercial spaces are
based on uses. The concern here was, they would be locked into a specific grouping of commercial uses. They wanted the flexibility to change those uses as long as they've got enough
parking for them. That's really what this is getting at. I think this also gets into their flexibility that he was talking about, that they may have a combination of commercial uses
that don't use up all the commercial parking in the parking structures and that, therefore, some of that could be available for residential use. I think that's what they're getting
at here. Typically, just so you know, if somebody has a site plan for a shopping center, we literally look at all the uses they have that day and say that's the parking you have to
provide. Where it gets us in trouble if somebody then comes in and wants to put in a restaurant where they had an office, and then now they're short of parking. That's why we came up
with a shared-use thing, in ways to try to be a little more flexible and that's what this is trying to do for them. I think give them some flexibility. They'll still have to meet the
minimum parking requirements, though, for the uses they have. Mayor Burk: That's clear in that proffer. First disclaimer, I have to disclaim that I live in this neighborhood. The whole
concept of redeveloping this particular shopping center was very exciting. I was very delighted to hear that that was something that was going in. My first overwhelming concern is 29
Item a. Page 24| December 13, 2021 the buildings. I think Ms. Nacy asked what the setbacks were. They are very large buildings right on the street and your comparison to the other
locations, Church and Market being one of them that's a legitimate comparison, but they are behind buildings. They are not right on the street. There's a difference, because you get
the older historic aspect and then you have the buildings behind it that are taller, but they connect into the Downtown design. These buildings really don't connect into any design
Downtown, and we've talked about this, I'm not telling you anything new, but these A and-- Poor Marty, I'm spread out all over here, you can't get anything. I’m right in his way, but
A and E are right on the streets, and they are anywhere from 70 feet, they're not 70 feet. There's one, two, three, four, five stories, and six stories? Brian Cullen: At the intersection
of High Street, they're 58 and 61 feet tall. Mayor Burk: These buildings, and you always say that this connects Downtown, it really connects Downtown. I can tell you that the Downtown
is a huge asset, there's not a lot of people in my neighborhood that walk Downtown. I do, but there's not a lot of people that walk Downtown. I'll take you at your word and say that
this is still part of connecting to the Downtown. This doesn't have anything that looks like the Downtown, this looks like this could go in the middle of Washington, DC, and it would
be great in Arlington, which is very modern. That has a real concern for me. You say that it's different when you see it in a 3D model or whatever, but those are both very massive buildings.
One of my pros is that the parking lot is in the middle, but the look of the buildings really has an impact on me. They are right up on Catoctin Circle, people will be walking by them,
and they're going to be these gigantic modern buildings. I think we could do better than that. That was one of my pros-- I mean, my cons. The commercial aspect of it going-- our aim
is to get 40/60 with commercial being 40%, and to move it down to 22 is really painful because commercial pays, okay, I'll be honest, pays much more in the tax bracket than homes. They
have much less service requirements. This also reduces the job possibilities, and all the time, we talk about that we want to have things Downtown, we want to have people working in
Town, not just Downtown, all over Town, but if you reduce commercial, then you're reducing the job possibilities, so that has a concern for me. The townhouses, I think they're appropriate,
they're fine. I wish the two-over-twos were a little more attractive, but that wouldn't stop me from voting for it. The buildings give me pause. The density of 50 per acre is quite
a bit more than the 24 by right. Again, with the buildings being what they are, that causes me concern. I will tell you that I have lived in one-bedroom apartments, all of my young
married life. My first five or six years being married, and it was not one person one car, it was two people and two cars, and I don't know that that number is really been honestly
counted in your parking. I love the fact that you have onebedroom apartments, we desperately need one-bedroom apartments and I'm fine with that, but it goes back to that parking requirement.
When I lived in those, one was in Arlington and one was in Herndon, and there were the two of us with the two cars, we did have mass transit there, we don't here. We still over there
had two cars, need for two spaces. I'm concerned that that's going to be a problem and that problem will affect the neighborhoods that are already established. Those neighborhoods that
already have parking issues, and believe me, they do have parking issues, that is going to add to that if we don't have the right ratio for parking. All these developers have come to
me and said, "Young people no longer want to have cars," and that may be true in Arlington and DC where you have options. We don't have options here in Leesburg, and so that concerns
me. That's on my con side. I'd like to see more character to the building's historic component to some aspect of it. I think the park is great. The Our park and the other small parks,
they're small. I don't know where the Entry Park is, I've never been able to find the Entry Park. My problem with the parks is the proffering. The first park doesn't come into place
until you're halfway through the townhouses. Where are those people going to take their kids or their tot lots and do things? Okay, I can understand you need to have some townhouses
built before you start the tot lots, the playground areas, but then you get into Entry Park, and you have to have the 400 residents before you do that one. High Street parking is 450
residents. 30 Item a. Page 25| December 13, 2021 The temporary park, which I have a feeling won't be temporary because it's a commercial building that I don't know that will ever
get built, because it has no trigger whatsoever to being built, that temporary park doesn't come in until the 450th. The Ours Overlook won't be constructed prior to the 37th occupancy
in D, but you have to have 81 townhouses, 240 in Building A, 266 in Building E, 35 of 72 in Building D. That's a long way through the process before you get the Overlook Park. I understand
you have construction issues; I understand all of that, but it's still a concern for me because those people don't have the amenities to do anything. Where are they going to go and
what are they going to do? I have a pro as the building wrap around the garage, that's great, but then again, I have the issue with the parking. No transit. Just because you have a
single bedroom doesn't mean there's going to be one person there. As a matter of fact, across the street from me, I have a neighbor who has three people living there and they have eight
cars, and a person next to them has two people living there and they have six cars. That's not unusual. Where are these cars going to go is an issue for the people that live around
there. That's what I'm hearing as I'm walking the streets, as I'm talking to people. Their concern is almost exclusively the parking and the look of it. I'm wondering that if the 858
is really going to be sufficient parking spaces. That has me very, very upset, not upset, very concerned. One of my pros is you did agree to public art. Yay, that's great, and that
carries a lot of weight. No, that's really, really good, but it still goes back to my amenities that I just went through. The triggers to get these things done really puts people in
these buildings with so little space, and we've learned from the pandemic that open space is so important to people, and to not have it, is tough. My next con is the traffic at 1% growth.
There are developments and Meadowbrook is going to have 55 new townhouses, White Oak is 162 single-family homes, Church & Market is 162 rentals, Crescent Place is 178. All of those
places are right there, and I know that everybody has said that you're not responsible for that, but I have to look at that as, what is it going to do to the people that are living
there? That area is so congested now that sometimes it takes me 5, 10 minutes to get out of my street because Catoctin Circle is backed up to the lights. Now we're adding all of these
people and they're going to be coming in, they're going to be using Catoctin Circle and that's going to have a huge impact on people that live there. Congestion, and I do believe that
in the urban areas are the place that we should have additional growth, that is where we should have a higher density. I do agree with that, but I also have to look at what is the impact
of the congestion, and how much will it cause, and I'm very concerned with that one. I'm concerned with, and you just said, somebody asked you this question before, Fairfax Street.
Fairfax Street coming out onto Catoctin is right on a curve. That is going to be one difficult intersection for safety reasons. I know there's nothing you can do about it, but I want
that on the record because I think that's going to be a future problem. I do have as a pro that you're putting a light in a raised crosswalk over at High Street. I think that's great.
That's going to make a big difference for those people that are walking and crossing, and taking their lives into their own hands, trying to get across right now. There's lots of people
that like Brandon Park, and they can't get over there because it is so dangerous and so rough, so they have another light up there, I think is a very good thing and I appreciate that.
The affordable units, the fact that you just agree to do the 33, I'm very delighted to hear that. The affordable units are important, but the definition of affordable is also important.
That's going to be something that the County and the Town are going to have to deal with. I wish I could say that it was a new problem, but my husband and I moved to Leesburg because
we couldn't afford to live in Fairfax. We moved from Herndon to Leesburg, bought a beat-up old house, fixed it up. Affordability, it's not new, and it's something we've just not done
a good job of dealing with. I'm going to be really looking at that. The support for the Farmers Market is very important. I hope that that will not be impacted negatively. The amount
of people that are there on a regular basis is pretty astounding. The other con for me is that this is a HUBZone. This is our prime development area for commercial and I'm concerned
that B is not going to be created. It's the last thing. It's also you have all the residential out on the main street, and then you have the commercial way in the back. That is something
that is not going to be really attractive to commercial development. It's another component that would make it 31 Item a. Page 26| December 13, 2021 less attractive to build. I was
surprised by the net fiscal impacts. I expected them to be higher. With that much building, I'm very surprised, but I guess that has to do with the fact that most of it is residential
and there's not as much commercial component that was there. The question was will you allow buses to go through there? Where is the bus stop? Brian Cullen: There's a public transit
bus stop at the Entry Park, which the Entry Park is right at Fairfax, which by the way, where Fairfax hits Catoctin is roughly where it hits today in front of the Deli South. The traffic
is very similar to what would be except for we have a light now, which will give some gapping, which would make it a better connection. The other at the end of the Commons Park by the
residential by the townhouse and two-over-two, we show a bus shelter there, but of course, it always gets approved by the County School System. We show a place where we think that the
predominance of the kids are going to be in the townhomes and two-over-twos. Mayor Burk: Because the bus shelter, I see-- Oh, so that's where Entry-- Where the bus shelter is on Catoctin,
that's where you calling Entry Park? Brian Cullen: Yes. There's a little seating area there and stuff. I have a bunch of images if you want me to bring them up. Mayor Burk: I still
have some issues, and I still have some problems with how to get to a point of approval, but there's some components to this that are great, and I really appreciate. The traffic issue,
that is going to be a major consideration and the parking is going to be a major consideration and the buildings, what they look like. This is an opportunity to make something really
dynamic and great and interesting and not something that you can put in the middle of DC. Those are my comments. Yes, Ms. Fox? Council Member Fox: I just had a couple of follow-ups
if that was okay. I was just wondering- Mayor Burk: I hope that was helpful. Council Member Fox: -who prepared the fiscal impact analysis for the project? Brian Cullen: We performed
the fiscal impact analysis by the Town's criteria, and we did three versions of it, actually. Council Member Fox: Okay. Cole Fazenbaker: There were actually -- RCLCO did one and then
the Town used their new model. We basically compared as well. Together, I think the range as a net, which was what's proposed minus what's already there. The Town's model was $525K
net positive were the consultants was about $600K and some changes, about $110K more. That's your range really. The Town was conservative. It's probably a net between $525K and $625K.
Just to give context, a penny on the real estate tax rate is about $850K. It's three-quarters of a penny. Council Member Fox: Okay. Thank you. One other question about the modifications
for either Brian, I suppose. The 32 modifications that you told -- that we outlined, or that were outlined here, how many of those-- Who presented those? Who asked for those? Was it
the Town? Was it the applicant? Brian Boucher: Yes, they were all requested by the applicant. A number of them came about through pre-application meetings, where staff felt that the--
Again, these are things that are modifiable, but they have to make a justification. They requested them. Then during the process, we identified an additional number of modifications
that might be in order. I would say that most of them originated with the applicant or the applicant in response to comments from staff. Council Member Fox: The last thing is, what
did the Planning Commission think about those modifications? 32 Item a. Page 27| December 13, 2021 Brian Boucher: The three modifications that the Planning Commission spoke to and
by implication really did not approve were the ones that are dealing with the reduction in the commercial square footage. Then there are these two tests. To increase density, you need
to meet two tests in the ordinance. They didn't agree with that one. Then the final one was the parking. Number 47 was the parking modification. Number 32 was this eight-part test to
get an increased density. Number 35 was the one where they requested the reduction in the square footage for non-residential. I'd say, by implication, the Commission didn't approve
any of these. Council Member Fox: That’s 3 of the 32 then, is what you're saying? Brian Boucher: Yes. Council Member Fox: Thanks. Mayor Burk: Mr. Steinberg/ Council Member Steinberg:
Yes, I want to be sure I understood. There isn't a traffic signal at Fairfax Street and Catoctin. Is that correct? Brian Cullen: Correct. Council Member Steinberg: Or there is? Brian
Cullen: There is. [crosstalk] Mayor Burk: Wait a minute. It’s on the other side. Council Member Steinberg: I'm not talking about High Street. I'm talking about Fairfax. There's no traffic
signal there. On High Street and Catoctin, is that a raised table? Brian Cullen: Yes. Mayor Burk: That they're proposing? Council Member Steinberg: Yes. I'm wondering, why not do the
same thing at Fairfax and Catoctin just for cars coming out of that intersection? Is there a reason not to? Brian Boucher: I can't recall that that actually came up, but that intersection,
I think you're going your right in and you're going right out. You don't have a left out of there. Mayor Burk: Yes, you do. Council Member Steinberg: I'm not so concerned about in and
out per se-- I am. Obviously, I'm talking about the traffic coming, measure for traffic that is coming through from Harrison Street, or from King Street for that matter, and slowing
the traffic down with two tables as opposed to one. I'm wondering if there's a reason not to do that. Brian Cullen: I think it just creates another bump in the road, which obviously
could be good. Council Member Steinberg: Sure. Brian Cullen: I think the gaping of the signals is really where we get the reduced speeds. Right now, that's posted at 25. We think that
most people are traveling at 40-ish. I think by putting the table at High Street with the signal, the gaping is going to take that way down. Council Member Steinberg: Out of curiosity,
is there a LEED standard to these buildings on site? 33 Item a. Page 28| December 13, 2021 Brian Cullen: We have a lot of things that we'll do internally. We are doing them for the
townhomes and two-over-twos. It's not a LEED standard, but we're doing a bunch of things internal to the building that would qualify for LEED. LEED has become a bit of a cottage industry.
Just an additional cost to getting the same product that you would get if you designed a building well. Council Member Steinberg: Okay. Thank you. Mayor Burk: Do we need to rewrite
Proffer 20 to be clearer if-- Brian Boucher: I would say that's something that would have to be done, is that Proffer 20, at least, the way I was looking at the language, it would need
to clarify that there was a commitment to that number regardless of the number of units in there. Mayor Burk: The other thing is, coming out of Fairfax Street, you can't go either way.
Whatever way you're going on Fairfax, if you're coming out on Market, you can go either in Catoctin. You can go either way, but it's a gamble. Pardon me. King, thank you. All right.
Is it Mr. Cummings? Council Member Cummings: Yes, just two quick questions. Going back to what Councilwoman Nacy was talking about, what are the amenities offered by Church and Market?
I wasn't here so I'm just curious. Brian Boucher: Forgive me, but I believe they're mostly internal amenities. It's room inside the building, internal. They'd asked for modification
to not have as much required per unit arguing that the Downtown itself, because they're right Downtown, was part of the recreational attraction. I'd have to look at it though, to get
the exact percentage of square feet they have per unit. Council Member Cummings: Got you. Brian Cullen: Might I add to that, though? We do have internal amenities, are also in our proffers.
I think when you look at these two buildings, A and E, there's outdoor spaces, are elevated there that are part of the amenity package for the residents there. While they're not public
amenities for everybody, they are serving the people that are living there. Council Member Cummings: Sure. I guess we're comparing a Crescent Park to what we're doing here, which, this
is more, building up density development, rather than the vertical development of culde-sacs, where you have parks that are easier to get. I think as we're thinking of amenities, we
should think more, it's not the same type of development as we're seeing in the Meadowbrook or other communities that have been developed here in Leesburg. My last question from a planning
standpoint, and I know that the preservation planner isn't here, and if we need her opinion, I'd love to see it emailed around. We talked about this as an extension of the Historic
Downtown. Would we really want the buildings to be designed to mimic the Downtown or does that create an issue with our Historic District having new buildings mimic the truly Historic
Downtown that we all love? Mayor Burk: That's not what I was asking for. Brian Boucher: I won't speak to that. I'll just say this, the Crescent District itself has a lot of architectural
standards in it and they don't necessarily require you to do something that resembles building Downtown. The preservation planner did look at these buildings. The applicant has made
the case that they differentiate the buildings; they are not all made out of the same type of material to try to replicate at least the diversity of building type that you have Downtown.
You have different color buildings different. Even though it's considered an extension of Downtown, I think it's more in the walkability. It doesn't have to be a replication of buildings
Downtown. The ordinance does say this, the closer you are to the Crescent, to the Historic Downtown, the more a building should have a traditional air to them. Mayor Burk: I'm not saying
that they should look just like the Downtown. I'm not saying that at all. I'm just saying that what these look like are something that you could put in the middle of Arlington or DC
in a very modern area. Can't they be made to look a little more classic, a little more-- I don't know what the word is, but a little more historic [unintelligible]? 34 Item a. Page
29| December 13, 2021 Brian Boucher: Have a few more traditional elements that you see Downtown. Mayor Burk: Anyone else have-- Yes, Mr. Bagdasarian. Council Member Bagdasarian: Just
a few more quick comments. We're at a crossroads right here as a Town and as a community, not only coming out of the pandemic and behaviors have changed, the way people work, have changed,
but we're also in the process of updating and actually launching a new Town Plan. What I was thinking is important is how does this align with our Town Plan, some of the aspirations,
the wants and needs and concerns, and certainly building more walkable communities. More options for housing are key aspects it, affordable housing are aspects of that. Obviously, the
affordability is going to be a factor because you've got market rates that are going to be the key factor. My Christmas wishes, adding additional 80 units if possible. I know that you're
meeting the requirements and committed to at least the level that is committed to now. I think that that's certainly important. The whole notion of traffic, this is something I've been
really mulling over late in the last several months and it's really a macro issue. It's not just what's happening at this intersection, but it's what's happening in our region. It's
what's happening in and around the Town and outside the Bypass. Looking at this from a comprehensive view, I think it's important not just for the Town, but the County as well and how
do we get people around. I know at one point in time, we had a trolley that would get people around the Town, maybe it's time to bring it back. There's other things that we need to
look at. Now, things have changed over the last 10 years. Looking towards the future, we could plan for the 1950s or the 2050s. We have to take those considerations in the plan. The
question that I was going to ask that Council Member Steinberger-- Steinberg asked was-- Steinberger. Hey, I'm changing your name. Mayor Burk: Are you hungry? Council Member Bagdasarian:
Actually, I am as a matter of fact. It's crazy what happens with your mind when you're hungry. Steinberg asked was LEED certification. Is that a concern to the Town? I know that that
is certainly a priority of many members of Council as far as being environmentally conscious and efficient as well. I'd love to hear your thoughts. Brian Boucher: One of the tests,
those eight tests that they can get credit for is LEED certification, which they're not proposing here. We didn't think they met that standard. On the other hand, I will say this, they
do some things that are better than the site is now. At the moment, there's no water quality control on the site at all because it was built before we had those regulations. They would
have to comply with all of that, all those requirements. That's an improvement environmentally to what the site is today. The second thing is they're going to introduce a lot more vegetation
trees in the area. You'd have a lot more trees on-site than you currently do. That's another thing that's a positive. They do have a [unintelligible] standard they meet for the building
that'll make it 10% more efficient than your typical. They proffered to that. We didn't think was quite what the ordinance was looking for, but all in all, it is environmentally positive
from those aspects. Brian Cullen: I would say that LEED includes things like white roofs, which we're doing in water conservation, and bikes and open space. There's a whole lot of things
that go into LEED. People think it's just a box, but it's the whole community. The walkability of this, I think-- We would have no problem qualifying for LEED. The problem is the process
of LEED has become a cottage industry, honestly. The whole network of people that are reviewing your application, approving your application, certifying, commissioning. It takes away
from what I can invest in, good LEED kind of things, by going through that process. We benefit tremendous. All these things you see here, the walkability and bike-ability, and all those
things would be factored into it, they're here. That's committed to, that's proffered. It's what we do inside the buildings, and it's in our best interest to take the utility load down
and take the water consumption down because we're going to own the buildings. That's how I feel about LEED. I've been around it for a long time and I've seen the whole cycle of it.
We're not trying to say we do not we want to do environmentally friendly buildings, but that standard just is a little challenging for us. 35 Item a. Page 30| December 13, 2021 Mayor
Burk: Alright -- Council Member Nacy: I just have one quick question. I just keep thinking about the, I think it was Councilwoman Fox that was talking about the ratio 60/40. Crescent
Design District was adopted when? Brian Boucher: I believe it's January 2013. Council Member Nacy: We're following something that's several years old at this point, and pre-COVID and
pre the destruction of commercial because of COVID. The current retail and office space, which is all that's there right now, is 134 square feet, is that what you said earlier? Brian
Boucher: Yes. Council Member Nacy: We're going up to 165, 800? Brian Boucher: Yes, right. Council Member Nacy: It's in a way more commercial than is there currently. Brian Boucher:
Yes, the site's built out to be more commercial than is presently here. Council Member Nacy: Even though it's 21% versus 40% for this? Brian Boucher: Correct. Council Member Nacy: Okay.
Thank you. Mayor Burk: Anybody else have any questions at this point? All right. What does Council want to do with this? We have a couple of choices. We have asked for some information.
We have asked for some changes. We can vote on this tomorrow. We could send it back to the Planning Commission. We could have another work session after Christmas to see what changes
you were able to make. What does Council want to do at this point? Somebody? Ms. Fox? Council Member Fox: I know I asked for some economic development. I'd like to get some information
before I've made a decision. Mayor Burk: Okay. Mr. Steinberg, were you going to say something? Council Member Steinberg: Well, yes, I would like to be sure that we solidify the ADU
issue, make sure that's all taken care of. I think there was a discussion about Proffer 20 that we need to finalize. Mayor Burk: We need to change it, yes. Brian Boucher: Proffer 20
was the parking. There was a question about whether or not the garages in the townhouses are limited to parking only. I need to look into that. That could be a potential change perhaps.
Mayor Burk: Ms. Nacy? Council Member Nacy: I'm just curious if we have a legal timeline that we need to adhere to. Mayor Burk: Mr. Spera? Council Member Nacy: I'm thinking of Planning
Commission. That's where my [unintelligible] after a certain point. Do we have that same? Christopher Spera: No, it's different once it comes to you. 36 Item a. Page 31| December 13,
2021 Council Member Nacy: Okay. Mayor Burk: All right. Then I'm hearing that you want another work session on this, and you can bring back whatever changes possible that you can make,
Mr. Cullen. Council Member Cummings: Can I just ask? We have a Proffer 20, it sounds like, and maybe some information on economic development, what else do we have to hear from? Mayor
Burk: All of the different things that we talked about. Could they change anything? Are they will be willing to look at making any changes? I think now you had all of us asking questions.
It's nine o'clock. We've been asking all this time for clarification information and possible changes, so if you can't, we've got to be able to allow the Council members to get answers
to their questions. Council Member Cummings: I think that we've had five work sessions at the Planning Commission, we've had a public hearing here, and-- Mayor Burk: Planning commission
turned it down? I don't think we want to rely on the Planning Commission. Council Member Cummings: That's fine. I think it’s -- Mayor Burk: Yes, Mr. Bagdasarian? Council Member Bagdasarian:
Do you have a summary of what we need to go back and review and the timeframe for that? Is it something that you turn around? Brian Boucher: It looks like there's one proffer change
the applicant had committed to, so that's simply a matter of changing the proffer language. There may be another one I want to discuss with them, but that's something that if they were
willing could be addressed pretty quickly. The information though that has been asked for on the economical, I don't know how long that will take. That's something Mr. Seymour will
have to speak to. Mayor Burk: Many of us had concerns that Mr. Cullen needs to address, if he could, maybe you can, but most certainly, I would think you'd want to go back and look
at what we said and see if there was any changes you could make. Brian Cullen: If I might, Madam Mayor, and I've learned not to argue with you, but I would say I think we have been
at this for a long time, and we've presented a very thorough case with staff's approval. I'm happy to make these changes and these proffer changes could be made today, tomorrow, easily.
They're just a few words on these. I think with respect to some of the things that people are concerned about, I'm unclear on the economic development. We feel like we have the right
amount of office. Our office is where it is because if you look at where the buildings are, and you pointed out very clearly on the architecture, hiding those garages is not an easy
task. They only fit in those two front land bays and that's why those buildings are there. It's not because we wanted to prioritize them or deprioritize the office. That office will
lease well because it's a unique office, it's 100K square feet. I don't think there's been 100K square feet of office delivered in Downtown Leesburg. Mayor Burk: Are you saying that
there's no changes that you're willing to make on your project? Brian Cullen: I'm comfortable making the proffer changes. If there's another specific change, you're asking me to make,
I'm not sure what the economic development change is. Mayor Burk: All right. Brian Cullen: I've heard a lot. I'm just saying, I think there's some things that we have spent a lot of
time and it's pretty cogent what we have here as a plan and it's very challenging to make changes that don't ripple through the rest of the plan. 37 Item a. Page 32| December 13, 2021
Mayor Burk: Okay. Mr. Martinez? Vice Mayor Martinez: Well, other than the proffer language for 20, proffer number 20, if that can be done tomorrow, I'm-- All the requests that I've
heard for information is not going to change the momentum of this project. As long as the Proffer 20 changes have been made and easily understandable, I'd be willing to vote on it tomorrow
night. Mayor Burk: All right, Ms. Nacy? Council Member Nacy: I just have a quick question because Mayor Burk brought up design. That's something that you wouldn't necessarily lock in
until after approval and down the road a little bit too, so is there still a potential to talk about that in the future, or process-wise, how does that work? Brian Boucher: I would
say, again, because there is a pretty specific concept playing here, they do have that interchangeability of square footage. Other than that, they're going to be fairly locked down
into what's proposed. Mayor Burk: All right, so Ms. Fox and Mr. Steinberg have asked to wait to get their information till after the holidays, but if someone wants to make a suggestion
and see if there's four people that we're willing to do it. Vice Mayor Martinez: Can I do that? Mayor Burk: Do you want to vote on it tomorrow? Vice Mayor Martinez: Correct. Mayor Burk:
All right. Vice Mayor Martinez: As long as Proffer 20 has been updated. Mayor Burk: Are there four people that want to vote on it tomorrow night? Mr. Bagdasarian, Mr. Steinberg, and
Mr. Martinez. Not Mr. Steinberg, Mr. Cummings. All right. Is there another suggestion? Mr. Steinberg? Council Member Steinberg: I fully appreciate how long this process has been going
on. I fully respect Brian's proposal here. There's no question that this will be a Town-changing project, there's absolutely no question. I don't think it's unreasonable for us to be
able to take the information that we've heard tonight, and just go over it in our individual heads, and come back at our first meeting in January, and take a final vote on this with
everything in place. I don't think that's an unreasonable point. Mayor Burk: You're suggesting not a work session, a direct vote, the first meeting in January, which is January 11th?
Council Member Cummings: Eleventh. Council Member Steinberg: So long as we have the information that we're looking for and everybody is satisfied with it, that's all. Mayor Burk: All
right. Are there four votes to do that? Wait a minute, we got more-- Let me see if we have four people that we're willing to do that. Council Member Nacy: My only comment was going
to be like, if we're kicking the can down the road, I just want to make sure that-- I agree that everybody should get the information they need to make the proper vote. If we're kicking
the can down the road, and you're waiting for something, and it's not really going to change your mind, ultimately, then we shouldn't kick the can down the road. That's just my thought
process there. If there's a life-changing thing that can happen, that's going to change your mind, then let's do that. Maybe not January, but the next meeting in December. 38 Item a.
Page 33| December 13, 2021 Mayor Burk: We don't have another meeting in December. Council Member Nacy: Oh. Okay. Mayor Burk: Council members that are asking for the additional time
to at least consider, they're not asking to go to a work session, they're going to go straight to a vote. Are there four people that would be willing to do that in January? Go straight
to the vote? Ms. Fox, Mr. Steinberg, Ms. Nacy, and myself. We'll go straight to the vote in January. Vice Mayor Martinez So moved. Mayor Burk: All right, we're not done. Future agenda
items for the Council. Anybody? Ms. Fox? Council Member Fox: I do have one. Thank you. I would like to ask the Council instead of waiting until January after the holidays, move to present
a proclamation for Elena Plasmier at tomorrow's business meeting, instead, because this young lady went way above and beyond. I know I just put it out to you. Mayor Burk: Well, I think
we have it. Council Member Steinberg: We have it. Council Member Fox: Oh, we do? Council Member Steinberg: Yes. Council Member Fox: Well, I had to ask because I just-- Council Member
Steinberg: Right there. Council Member Fox: Oh, reminded me. Thank you. Mayor Burk: Mr. Steinberg? Council Member Steinberg: Yes. At some point in the future, since we've had a lot
of discussions on electric cars, and the type of infrastructure required for electric cars. It also occurred to me that especially based on the recent events in Kentucky and Tennessee,
what happens, or how do we plan for an event that substantially disrupts the electric grid as we get further into the future and more and more people are relying on that grid for transportation?
I just thought it might be worth having a conversation with our Emergency Management team and see what considerations we may be making. Mayor Burk: Is this a memo, or is this a work
session item? Council Member Steinberg: Well, if staff feels they can inform us adequately through a memo, that's fine. Otherwise, if they would rather offer a presentation through
a work session-- I wouldn't think it takes that much time, in any case. Mayor Burk: I'm looking at Mr. Town Manager. Council Member Steinberg: Who can come to his chair now. Kaj Dentler:
I know she's looking at me. I don't know what is best. I think the better would be for me to have Joe talk directly to you, make sure we understand exactly what you're asking in the
scope, and then I could answer your question. If that's okay, if we have the flexibility to go either way, but I do not know on the spot, what is better to answer your questions. Mayor
Burk: You're asking for information about the- 39 Item a. Page 34| December 13, 2021 Council Member Steinberg: How we could in our emergency management planning, anticipate a situation
where we have a serious disruption to our electric grid? Mayor Burk: All right. If it turns out you need-- he says the work session, we'll do a work session, if not, it's just a memo.
Is that what you're saying? Council Member Steinberg: Speak with Joe and see where we go. Kaj Dentler: Yes. I think my gut would be, it'd be very difficult to convey a message in an
info, where we can't have a dialogue from addressing what your questions are. We can plan, [unintelligible] hit your point. Council Member Steinberg: In that case, then I would offer
that we put it on a future work session. Mayor Burk: Future work session. Are there four people that are willing to do that? Ms. Nacy, Mr. Bagdasarian, myself, Mr. Steinberg, and Ms.
Fox. Anybody else have anything they want to add? Right. Is there a motion to adjourn? All in favor. Council Members: Aye. Mayor Burk: Opposed? 40 Item a. COUNCIL MEETING
December 14, 2021 1 | P a g e Council Chamber, 25 West Market Street, 7:00 p.m. Mayor Kelly Burk presiding. Council
Members Present: Ara Bagdasarian, Zach Cummings, Suzanne Fox, Vice Mayor Marty Martinez, Kari Nacy, Neil Steinberg, and Mayor Kelly Burk. Council Members Absent: None. Staff Present:
Town Manager Kaj Dentler, Town Attorney Christopher Spera, Director of Public Works and Capital Projects Renee LaFollette, Director of Parks and Recreation Rich Williams, Director
of Finance and Administrative Services Clark Case, Deputy Director of Finance and Administration/Treasurer Lisa Haley, Controller Diane Starkey, Deputy Director of Utilities Patrick
Moore, Management and Budget Officer Cole Fazenbaker and Clerk of Council Eileen Boeing. AGENDA ITEMS 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. INVOCATION was given by Council Member Steinberg.
3. SALUTE TO THE FLAG was led by Council Member Fox. 4. ROLL CALL a. All Council Members present. 5. MINUTES a. Work Session Minutes of November 22, 2021 MOTION 2021-220
On a motion by Vice Mayor Martinez, seconded by Council Member Steinberg, the minutes of the Work Session of November 22, 2021, were moved for approval. The
motion was approved by the following vote: Aye: Bagdasarian, Cummings, Fox, Vice Mayor Martinez, Nacy, Steinberg and Mayor Burk Nay: None Vote: 7-0 b. Regular Session Minutes of November
23, 2021 MOTION 2021-221 On a motion by Vice Mayor Martinez, seconded by Council Member Nacy, the minutes of the Regular Session of November 23, 2021, were moved for approval. The
motion was approved by the following vote: Aye: Bagdasarian, Cummings, Fox, Vice Mayor Martinez, Nacy, Steinberg and Mayor Burk Nay: None Vote: 7-0 41 Item b. COUNCIL MEETING
December 14, 2021 2 | P a g e 6. ADOPTING THE MEETING AGENDA Council Member Cummings requested item 13.a.
– Motion to Rescind Resolution 2021154 be removed from the agenda. MOTION 2021-223 On a motion by Council Member Cummings, seconded by Council Member Steinberg, the following was proposed:
To adopt the agenda with item 13.a. – Motion to Rescind Resolution 2021-154 removed Mayor Burk requested to have item 13.c. – Motion to approve the proclamation for Alaina Plasmier
approved and moved to the presentation of the proclamations. MOTION 2021-222 On a motion by Mayor Burk, seconded by Council Member Steinberg, the following was proposed: To move
item 13.c. – Motion to Approve the Proclamation for Alaina Plasmier and to move it to Section 8 – Presentation of Proclamations The motion was approved by the following vote: Aye:
Bagdasarian, Cummings, Fox, Vice Mayor Martinez, Nacy, Steinberg and Mayor Burk Nay: None Vote: 7-0 Council discussed the motion to remove item 13.a. – Motion to Rescind Resolution
2021-154. The motion to adopt the meeting agenda with item 13.a. – Motion to Rescind Resolution 2021-154 removed was approved by the following vote: Aye: Bagdasarian, Cummings, Vice
Mayor Martinez, Steinberg and Mayor Burk Nay: Fox, Nacy Vote: 5-2 7. CERTIFICATES OF RECOGNITION a. None. 8. PRESENTATION OF PROCLAMATIONS a. Alaina Plasmier Proclamation Mayor Burk
read the proclamation for Alaina Plasmier. Ms. Plasmier accepted the proclamation and made a few remarks. 42 Item b. COUNCIL MEETING
December 14, 2021 3 | P a g e 9. PRESENTATIONS a. Trophy Presentation for Best Float in the Holiday Parade Mayor Burk presented the trophy for the best 2021
Holiday Parade Float to the Destiny School of the Arts. The students and the school representative made a few remarks. b. Fiscal Year 2021 Annual Financial Report by Brown Edwards
& Company Ms. Ann Genova, Audit Manager with Brown Edwards & Company presented Council with the Fiscal Year 2021 Annual Financial Report. 10. REGIONAL COMMISSION REPORTS Mayor Burk
reported on the VML Executive Committee meeting and noted that attendees were very pleased with Leesburg as the host of the in-person VML Conference held last October. 11. PETITIONERS
The Petitioner's Section was opened at 7:31 p.m. Jeff Carey. Spoke to Council in opposition of the vaccine mandate. Paul Kershaw, Virginia for Medical Freedom. Spoke to Council
in opposition of the vaccine mandate. Bill Fox, 15 Morven Park Road NW. Spoke to Council in opposition of the vaccine mandate. Ron Campbell, 812 Ft. Macleod Terrace NE. Spoke in
support of the Leesburg Mobile Park residents. Jenny Hall. Spoke to Council in opposition of the vaccine mandate. Bonnie McLean. Spoke to Council in opposition of the vaccine mandate.
Vicente Gonzalez, 15 Leesburg Mobile Park. Spoke to Council to thank them for their ongoing and continued support of the Leesburg Mobile Park residents. Mariana Gonzalez, 349 Shenandoah
Street SW. Spoke to Council regarding her desire to stay in the Leesburg Mobile Park. Sarah Richardson. Spoke to Council in opposition of the Virginia Village rezoning application.
Paul Coyer. Spoke to Council in opposition of the Vaccine Mandate. The Petitioner's Section was closed at 7:59 p.m. 43 Item b. COUNCIL MEETING
December 14, 2021 4 | P a g e 12. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA MOTION 2021-224 On a motion by Vice Mayor Martinez, seconded by Council Member
Bagdasarian, the following consent agenda was proposed: a. 2021 Tree City USA Application RESOLUTION 2021-189 Authorizing the Mayor to Sign the 2021 Tree City USA Application for
the Arbor Day Foundation b. Second Amendment to Hospital Tank Antenna Lease Agreement with T-Mobile RESOLUTION 2021-190 Authorizing a Second Amendment to the Lease Agreement with
T-Mobile Northeast, LLC for Telecommunication Antennas on the Town Hospital Tank Located at 210 Old Waterford Road c. Creek Valley Buffer and Floodplain – Regulatory Amendments RESOLUTION
2021-191 Initiation of Amendments to Zoning Ordinance Articles 7, 14 and 18 and Applicable Sections of the Design and Construction Standards Manual and the Subdivision and Land Development
Regulations to Amend Modifications to Creek Valley Buffers and Permitted Uses within Floodplains d. Replacement of Biological Nutrient Reactor Splitter Box Gates at Water Pollution
Control Facility RESOLUTION 2021-192 Approving a Task Order for the Replacement of Biological Nutrient Reactor Splitter Box Gates at the Water Pollution Control Facility to WGK Construction,
LLC in the amount of $113,899 e. Exterior Building Cleaning and Sealant at the Water Pollution Control Facility RESOLUTION 2021-193 Approving a Task Order for Exterior Building Cleaning
and Sealant Application at the Water Pollution Control Facility to Utility Service Co., Inc. in the amount of $156,623 44 Item b. COUNCIL MEETING
December 14, 2021 5 | P a g e f. Replacement of the Radiator on the Standby Generator at the Water Pollution Control Facility RESOLUTION
2021-194 Approving a Task Order for the Replacement of the Radiator on the Standby Generator at the Water Pollution Control Facility to Carter Machinery for $149,905.64 g. Demolition
and Replacement of a Digester Motor Control Center at the Water Pollution Control Facility RESOLUTION 2021-195 Approving a Task Order for the Demolition and Replacement of a Digester
Motor Control Center at the Water Pollution Control Facility to Electric By J&J in the amount of $128,092 h. Pavement Resurfacing – Cornwall Street from King to Memorial RESOLUTION
2021-196 Approving a Task Order for the Demolition and Replacement of a Digester Motor Control Center at the Water Pollution Control Facility to Electric By J&J in the amount of $128,092
i. Appointment to Bull Run Alcohol Safety Action Program Policy Board RESOLUTION 2021-197 Appointing Kari Nacy to the Bull Run Alcohol Safety Action Program Policy Board j. Appointing
Matthew Abate to the Police Citizen Task Force RESOLUTION 2021-199 Appointing Matthew Abate to the Police Citizen Task Force The Consent Agenda was approved by the following vote:
Aye: Bagdasarian, Cummings, Fox, Vice Mayor Martinez, Nacy, Steinberg, and Mayor Burk Nay: None Vote: 7-0 13. RESOLUTIONS /ORDINANCES / MOTIONS a. Motion to Rescind Resolution 2021-154
This item was removed from the agenda. b. Renaming of Harry Byrd Highway (Route 7) MOTION 2021-225 On a motion by Vice Mayor Martinez, seconded by Council Member Steinberg, the following
was proposed: 45 Item b. COUNCIL MEETING December 14, 2021 6 | P a g e RESOLUTION 2021-198 Renaming Harry Byrd
Highway (Route 7) within Town of Leesburg Corporate Limits to Leesburg Pick Mayor Burk noted the County had voted on renaming roadways in the County and forwarded it to the General
Assembly for approval. Vice Mayor Martinez noted that while he made the motion, he would not support it. The motion was approved by the following vote: Aye: Bagdasarian, Cummings,
Fox, Nacy, Steinberg and Mayor Burk Nay: Vice Mayor Martinez Vote: 6-1 14. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. None. 15. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a. None. 16. NEW BUSINESS a. None. 17. COUNCIL DISCLOSURES
AND COMMENTS / ADDITIONS TO FUTURE MEETINGS Council Member Bagdasarian requested the Economic Development Commission and the Economic Development Director provide input on the economic
impact of the Virginia Village Rezoning Application to be included in the staff report when the item is presented for approval at the next Council meeting. Council Member Fox disclosed
she had a meeting with Mr. Brian Cullen regarding the Virginia Village Rezoning Application. Council Member Fox asked for a Motion to Rescind Resolution 2021-154 be added to the January
11, 2022, Council Meeting. Council Member Cummings disclosed he had a conversation with Mr. Brian Cullen and Mr. Andrew Painter regarding the Virginia Village Rezoning and met with
Ms. Molly Novotny and Ms. Colleen Gillis with Cooley to review some of their clients’ properties in Leesburg. 18. MAYOR DISCLOSURES AND COMMENTS / ADDITIONS TO FUTURE MEETINGS Mayor
Burk stated that she and other elected officials officially opened the Holiday Road Show at Morven Park on November 26 and thanked Ms. Stacey Metcalfe and the Board for a great show.
Mayor Burk was honored to recognize Morningside resident Ms. Katherine Burch who turned 100 years old. Mayor Burk participated in lighting the Menorah at the Sha'are Shalom synagogue
and thanked Rabbi Tow and the Congregation for the warm welcome. Mayor Burk was joined by Council Members Fox, Nacy, and Steinberg, Vice Mayor Martinez and 46 Item b. COUNCIL MEETING
December 14, 2021 7 | P a g e Congresswoman Wexton for the tree lighting celebration in Town. Mayor Burk said
she was joined by Maggie, Sam, Caleb, and Savannah who helped pull the lever to light the tree. Mayor Burk presented a proclamation to Caldwell Banker Realtors for 10 years at their
present location and 30 years in Leesburg. Mayor Burk attended the annual Parks and Rec Arts and Craft show. Mayor Burk attended the tree and house lighting ceremony at the George
Marshall House and noted that they have a decorated tree for every country that was in the Marshall Plan. Mayor Burk participated in the lighting of the Menorah for the Chabad of Loudoun
County and said Rabbi Cohen and the congregation were generous and welcoming. Mayor Burk noted she attended the VML Executive Committee meeting in Charlottesville and congratulated
the Town’s new police officers. Mayor Burk noted the Christmas parade had to be moved from Saturday to Sunday due to weather but thanked the Parks and Rec staff for a great job reorganizing
it to the next day. Mayor Burk spoke at the Loudoun County public hearing regarding the Airport Noise Overlay District as the County is looking to do away with the one-mile overlay
district that requires homeowners to be notified that they're living near an airport and noise associated with their location. Mayor Burk wished everyone a Merry Christmas and happy
holidays. 19. TOWN MANAGER COMMENTS a. None. 20. CLOSED SESSION a. Pending Litigation/Annexation and/or a Boundary Line Agreement with respect to the JLMA MOTION 2021-226 On a
motion by Mayor Burk, seconded by Vice Mayor Martinez, the following was proposed: I move pursuant to § 2.2-3711(A)(7) and § 2.2-3711(A)(8) of the Code of Virginia that the Leesburg
Town Council convene in a closed meeting for the purpose of consultation with legal counsel and briefings by staff members pertaining to the pending litigation of Town of Leesburg et
al v. Loudoun County et al, Loudoun County Circuit Court No. 19-1768 where such consultation in open session would adversely affect the negotiating or litigating posture of the Town;
and consultation with legal counsel regarding specific legal matters requiring the provision of legal advice by such counsel, and pertaining to a potential annexation and/or boundary
line agreement with respect to the JLMA. The motion was approved by the following vote: Aye: Bagdasarian, Cummings, Fox, Vice Mayor Martinez, Nacy, Steinberg and Mayor Burk Nay: None
Vote: 7-0 Council convened in a closed session at 8:08 p.m. Council convened in an open session at 8:34 p.m. 47 Item b. COUNCIL MEETING
December 14, 2021 8 | P a g e MOTION 2021-227 On a motion by Mayor Burk, the following was proposed: In accordance with Section § 2.2-3712 of the Code
of Virginia, I move that Council certify to the best of each member’s knowledge, only public business matters lawfully exempted from open meeting requirements under Virginia Freedom
of Information Act and such public business matters for the purpose identified in the motion by which the closed meeting was convened were heard, discussed or considered in the meeting
by Council. (ROLL CALL VOTE) Fox – aye, Steinberg – aye, Cummings – aye, Vice Mayor Martinez – aye, Bagdasarian – aye, Nacy – aye, Mayor Burk – aye. Vote 7-0 21. ADJOURNMENT On
a motion by Vice Mayor Martinez, seconded by Council Member Steinberg, the meeting was adjourned at 8:35 p.m. __________________________ Kelly Burk, Mayor
Town of Leesburg ATTEST: _______________________ Clerk of Council 2021_tcmin1214 48 Item b. Page 1 | December 14, 2021 December 14, 2021 – Town Council Meeting (Note: This is
a transcript prepared by a Town contractor based on the video of the meeting. It may not be entirely accurate. For greater accuracy, we encourage you to review the video of the meeting
that is on the Town’s Web site – www.leesburgva.gov or refer to the approved Council meeting minutes. Council meeting videos are retained for three calendar years after a meeting per
Library of Virginia Records Retention guidelines.) Mayor Kelly Burk: I would like to call to order tonight's meeting of December 14th, 2021. If anyone in the room needs hearing assistance,
please see the Clerk. We will be running the translation during the petitioner section. Is that correct? We will be running the automatic translation on the overhead starting in the
petitioner section. Council Member Steinberg will be giving the invocation followed by salute to the flag, Council Member Fox. Council Member Steinberg. Council Member Neil Steinberg:
Thank you, Mayor Burk. I'd like for us to all take a moment of silence to reflect on the families who lost family members or homes in the recent storms in the Midwest and for us all
to remember that while we don't often agree with each other, we're here to do good work and how fortunate we are to be here. Council Member Suzanne Fox: Please join me in the pledge.
Council Member Steinberg: Thank you. All: I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible,
with liberty and justice for all. Mayor Burk: All right, let the record reflect that all Members of Council are here tonight. We have two sets of minutes. The working session minutes
of November 22nd moved by Vice Mayor Martinez, second by Council Member Steinberg, all in favor? Council Members: Aye. Mayor Burk: Opposed? That's 7-0. Regular session minutes of the
23rd, Mr. Martinez. Second? Council Member Kari Nacy: Second. Mayor Burk: All right, Council Member Nacy. All in favor? Council Members: Aye. Mayor Burk: The passes, no nays, that passes
7-0. Adopting the meeting agenda. Are there any changes to the adoption of the meeting agenda? Council Member Ara Bagdasarian: Madam Mayor, I'd like to remove item 13A. Mayor Burk:
Item 13A. Council Member Fox: Madam Mayor, point of order. Mayor Burk: Yes. Council Member Fox: A motion to approve an agenda, published agenda is debatable so is any amendment to that
agenda. I have a few things to say. Mayor Burk: I'm sorry. I can't hear you very well. 49 Item b. Page 2 | December 14, 2021 Council Member Fox: [chuckles] A motion to approve an
agenda, a published one is debatable and so is any amendment to that agenda. I’d like to say a few words to it. Mayor Burk: Mr. Spera, is that correct reading? Christopher Spera: I
believe that is correct. It is a debatable motion but the motion hasn't been seconded yet, so you need a second and once you have a second, then you can have debate. Mayor Burk: Okay.
All right. Are we debating taking it off the agenda? Okay. All right. We have a motion to take-- Which one is it? It is motion 13A. It was moved by Council Member Cummings. Is there
a second? Council Member Steinberg: Second. Mayor Burk: Seconded by Council Member Steinberg. Ms. Fox, you said you had something you wanted to say? Council Member Fox: Yes, I do have
something I wanted to say. The reason I am not willing to take this off the agenda is because we've had a lot of folks who have spoken up about this and have not had their voices heard
and I intend to go ahead and speak for them. Mayor Burk: All right. All in favor-- I'm also going to ask that we move, it's 13C but it's the presentation to [unintelligible 00:03:48]
so I would like to have that moved also. Do I have a second? Council Member Steinberg: Second. Mayor Burk: Seconded by Council Member Steinberg. Okay, so we're adopting the meeting
minutes with the removal of the motion-- Council Member Steinberg: [unintelligible] Mayor Burk: Oh, meeting agenda, sorry. We're adapting the meeting agenda with the exception of 13C,
that's not there now. It was the motion to give the recognition to Atlanta. We have the other one which is 13A, so all the rest of it we're working to approve. All in favor indicate
but saying aye. Council Members: Aye. Mayor Burk: Opposed? That's 7-0. Okay, I will just quickly, obviously, I want to move the presentation so we can present it tonight. Is everybody
okay with that? Vice Mayor? All seconded? All in favor of moving that presentation to 8A. Council Member Fox: What presentation, I'm sorry? Mayor Burk: For Alaina. Council Member Fox:
Oh, okay, sure. Mayor Burk: That's all. All in favor? Speakers: Aye Mayor Burk: Opposed? Now we have 13 a, do we have Mr. Cummings? Council Member Steinberg: [inaudible] Mayor Burk:
I'm sorry. 50 Item b. Page 3 | December 14, 2021 Council Member Steinberg: The motion. Council Member Fox: The motion to remove it, and I have some things to say to it. Mayor Burk:
Council Member Cummings made the motion. It was seconded by Council Member Steinberg. If you have something you want to say at this point. Council Member Fox: Yes, I do. Thank you.
I'm going to read a few things from our employees. We are uncomfortable coming forward. We have experienced pushback at the prospect of addressing Town Council about this issue. I've
been told that if I come to speak it won't make a difference. Again, I'm receiving pressure from coworkers to not make things worse. Don't rock the boat, don't poke the bear. This mandate
has put department heads in an impossible position to hire. This includes current and open positions, let alone backfilling positions when people decide to walk. There have been a handful
of interviews before our vote passed to pass that mandate and two signings of acceptance letters. Once they found out that the mandate passed, they withdrew their acceptance letters.
From another employee. Town vaccine requirement has put me in a position where I've had to share personal medical information and in order to request a waiver, which could even be denied.
Council Member Fox, I'm afraid that if I were to have the vaccine, I would suffer additional health problems as a result of the vaccine. I'm being afraid that I could risk everything
I've spent years building. We have great relationships with our coworkers and our customers. This is all from our employees. These are from our commissioners. To me, this is bad policy.
It's divisive, unnecessary, and legally problematic. People do have strong feelings about this, but whatever you believe about the effectiveness of the vaccine, we start inserting ourselves.
When we start inserting ourselves into the private and personal decisions of employees, that's not going to foster a positive work environment. We're literally setting up a scenario
that pits the vaccinated against the unvaccinated. You've seen so far, and we all know that most of the attention we have is on our police officers who have resigned rather than comply.
It's not a good thing. One of the reasons that I feel like it's also legally problematic is because it is unnecessary as there's no data that there's a problem at this point. Even if
we had a problem, there's data to show the mandatory universal vaccination would do anything to fix that problem. All of the most recent studies seem to indicate that while vaccination
is often effective to reduce symptoms, it does nothing to stop or even slow the spread in the population. Other protocols for remediating or slowing the spread of COVID practices are
practices that we have already put in here in place. We have our masks, we have our social distancing, and those are proven to help stop this spread. Instituting a mandatory vaccination
policy makes no sense whatsoever. First, we claimed that we felt we had to go ahead and institute this policy because we had no choice because of the Federal mandate. Then there was
a stay of that mandate and rather than consider the motion to ascend, we use parliamentary maneuvering to not even discuss it anymore or even vote on it. In my opinion, inserting ourselves
into using the threat of losing one's livelihood as the bludgeon to enforce their will in our workforce to get our way. Frankly, I think it's draconian and I think it's tyrannical,
and many employees admittedly don't have a problem with this and that's fine. The fact is we also have employees that are vaccinated and are offended by this policy not because they
were forced to get the vaccination, but they were forced to divulge personal medical information that they should have not have had to disclose to an employer. We have medical privacy
laws for a reason. We're pushing this with the justification that we need a safe work environment, and we have a safe work environment, low rates of COVID vanishingly low death rates,
particularly for our workforce-age residents. Now Biden is 0-3 in Federal courts. From what I have to say, I've received communications from our Town employees. I just read them to
you about fear tactics, intimidation, and retaliation for speaking out. There have been sick leave threats, there have been forced resignations. 51 Item b. Page 4 | December 14, 2021
This is upsetting to me. Regardless of to what extent these accusations are true, they're not the type of messages I want to hear as an employee and as a public official. The mandate
was stayed, OSHA suspended enforcement. We're still digging in. We're putting our employees last in my opinion. Their private medical history and medical decisions have always been
off-limits, but we've inserted ourselves there. Forcing employees or for any American that matter to choose between their livelihoods and their freedom is a grotesque abuse of power,
and I feel like it's our job to encourage and not to enforce. Thank you. Mayor Burk: Thank you, Ms. Fox. Ms. Nacy, you have your light on? Council Member Nacy: Yes, thank you. I echo
what Councilwoman Fox said. I just think at this point, it's prudent both legally and in general to rescind this mandate so that we don't lose any more employees, although I think the
damage may already be done there, and so that we don't put ourselves in a position for future lawsuits. Mayor Burk: Right. Anyone else? Mr. Cummings? Council Member Zach Cummings: Thank
you, I just want to quickly remind the public that we're talking about 3% of our employees, 97% of employees are willing to comply with this, whether that means being vaccinated or
requesting a religious or medical exemption and to this point, according to the Town Manager, no medical or religious exemption has been denied. All we're asking is for Town employees
to comply with one of the three options that they have in front of them. 97% of the Town employees have complied and I've heard from Town employees who've complied and thanked me and
thanked the Council for doing this. To continue bringing this up week after week, and talk about court cases that are talking about private industry and the government, this is a employee-employer
situation and we are asking our employees as an idea to work here to comply with this and this is a right to work state and they have every right not to work here but they also have
a right to comply with one of the three methods that was given to them by the Town Council. Mayor Burk: Okay, thank you, Mr. Cummings. I would agree with Mr. Cummings remarks, to know
that we now have 97% of our employees are vaccinated is a tremendous option and we have given them the opportunity, three different ways and they have taken advantage of it and they
are safer and their colleagues are safer. I have heard from many, many employees that literally have come up to me in the hallways and thanked me. They feel better for it, and they're
happy that we've done it. I think it's kind of a-- I'm not sure why we're doing it every week, but we've got it to the point where 97% of the people are vaccinated. I'm delighted that
our employees are willing to follow the directions and really be cooperative and I'm very grateful that they're willing to do that. That being the case, we have a motion from Council
Member Cummings and seconded by Council Member Steinberg to remove 13 A from the agenda. All in favor indicate by saying aye. Council Members: Aye. Mayor Burk: Opposed. Council Members
Fox and Nacy: Nay. Mayor Burk: So that is 5-2 that gets removed. All right. We voted on the other one. All right. Next, we have presentations. We have two presentations tonight. One
of them is for the holiday float and very excited to go down and present this one. The other one is a recognition for Alaina Plasmier and Alaina. Am I saying that correct, Alaina? Alaina
Plasmier: Alaina. 52 Item b. Page 5 | December 14, 2021 Mayor Burk: Alaina. Thank you. Alaina Plasmier is an eighth-grade girl scout in troop 70084 in Leesburg, Virginia. Whereas,
Alaina participated in her middle school food drive, in which she donated over 600 nonperishable food items, which doubled the amount the school was able to donate. Whereas, Alaina
also worked over the holiday break by doing odd jobs for neighbors and pet sitting, and whereas, she then used the money she earned to purchase additional nonperishable food items to
donate. Whereas, the Town Council thanks Alaina for her hard work and efforts and going above and beyond for the community this holiday season, therefore proclaimed that the Mayor and
the Council of the Town of Leesburg in Virginia hereby recognize Alaina Plasmier for making a positive difference in the lives of others and showing great leadership and setting the
right examples for others to follow. Proclaimed this 14th day in December 2021. I'm going to go down and present these holiday light trophy and this proclamation. Would be students
from Destiny School of the Arts come forward here. Now, this is the trophy that they have won. This is quite impressive, and I noticed that your school's name is on it from 2017 and
now it's going to be added for 2021. I was wondering if you girls and boys would turn around and see the cameras. People are watching you in the cameras. Would anybody like to explain
what you did and what was great about your float? Because this was for the Christmas parade. You're being awarded recognition that your float was the best one in the Christmas parade.
Who would like to take the mic and explain what it looked like and why it's so great? You can. My name is? Jana: My name is Jana. We put a lot of lights on there. We also had a band.
I was the bass player; Kevin was the drum player and then Chase was the pianist. Oh, Savannah Nacy was one of the singers. Mayor Burk: Wonderful. What was different about it? Why do
you think yours got selected [inaudible] What do you think? [unintelligible] look good. Was it really lit nicely? Chase: Yes, it was. It was lit nicely. It was a really nice-looking
float. Mayor Burk: What did you like about the float? Kevin: I like how ours was very different from everybody else’s. Mayor Burk: It was very different. It was big and it was very
exciting. Savannah, what did you like about it? Savannah: I liked how ours was designed to show our love. Mayor Burk: Oh, that's sweet. Well, thank you guys very much for coming tonight.
I'm going to give this to you guys and I don't know who's going to take it. You guys, this is the recognition, the certificates, and you can put it up in your music classroom, or you
can put it up in school somewhere. We're very proud of you for putting it together. We were excited that you all participated. You want to come and join us over here? All right. Thank
you. Thank you very much. [applause] Would you like to say anything as the director and the leader of the group? [laughs] I didn't say the name of the school, so we-- [inaudible] Speaker:
We're Destiny School of the Arts right here in Leesburg and we teach academics and the arts each day. We're so happy to be here. We were really excited to be recognized that the students
put in so much work and so did our teachers, so many rehearsals. We couldn't be prouder of what they're doing and who they are. Mayor Burk: Thank you. Thank you very much. Thank you
guys very much for your hard work. [applause] 53 Item b. Page 6 | December 14, 2021 The next one Ms. Fox, would you like to come down and join me on this one? See you, guys. Bye.
Now Ms. Fox put this in to recognize Alaina if you want to come forward. We're giving you this proclamation, why don’t you stand between us. We're giving you this proclamation because
of all your hard work that you did to help others. What made you want to do that? How did you figure out to do something like that? Alaina Plasmier: I just like helping my community.
The more and more I donate I feel like the more love I'm giving to the community. Mayor Burk: Oh, this is a very loving night tonight. Wow, that's just fabulous. Well, we really appreciate
it. All that that you gave over 600 food items, and then you worked and you got even more, I'm sure you really made a difference. Thank you very much. [applause] Alaina Plasmier: During
the holiday season, we usually do a Coat Drive and Can Food Drive in my neighborhood. We usually donate around 500 coats to Mobile Hope and over 500 cans to Loudoun Hunger Relieve.
Mayor Burk: That's wonderful. Great. Thank you. Would you like to say anything, Ms. Fox?? Council Member Fox: Sure, just real quick, Alaina. You are an inspiring young lady and I feel
that way myself and I know that the Council by proclamation feels the same way about you. We thank you for your service and your care and your support for your fellow human beings in
your community. We hope you keep up the good work. Thank you. Mayor Burk: Thank you. Thank you, guys. [applause] Thank you very much. I think [unintelligible] Alaina Plasmier: Thank
you. Mayor Burk: All right. Thank you. All right. We are now at the Regional Commission reports. Council Member Cummings: [inaudible] Madam Mayor? Mayor Burk: Pardon me. Council Member
Cummings: Your 9B. Mayor Burk: Oh, 9B. I missed one. Someone's here to present. This is the Annual Financial Report by Brown Edwards and Company. Clark Case: Good evening, Mayor Burk,
Vice-Mayor Martinez and Members of the Council. I'm Clark Case. I'm the director of finance and administrative services for the Town. I want to introduce Ann Genova who is the Brown
Edwards and Company Audit Manager for the audit of the Town. The auditors work for the Town Council, not for the Town Manager of the staff. This report is their report to you. I have
also here with me, Diane Starkey. Raise your hand. Diane Starkey is the Town's Controller. She and her team do the vast majority of the heavy lifting to put together the annual comprehensive
financial report. Ann is here to tell you about the findings and the results of the audit and some summary information out of what's in the annual report. Annual report is very long,
very technical, very detailed. Ann's going to give you a very high-level review of what are key factors and important points. Ann. 54 Item b. Page 7 | December 14, 2021 Ann Genova:
Hi, thank you Town Council for the opportunity to present on the audit this evening and to serve the Town as the external auditor. I'd like to give a special thanks to the Finance Department,
especially Diane Starkey for their cooperation and hard work on the audit. There are several components to the audit, one you have in front of you now, which is the audited financial
statements. We help the Town prepare those. Then another component of the audit is that we issue an opinion-- That didn't do what I thought I was going to do. We issue an opinion and
I'm pleased to report that we have issued an unmodified clean opinion, and this indicates reasonable but not absolute assurance that the financial statements are materially correct.
The Town also submits their annual report to the GFOA and for 2020, they did receive the certificate and then they'll apply for 2021 soon. What I'd like to do today is really drill
down into exhibit 3. We're going to be going to page 10 as a starting point. Page 10. We're going to look at exhibit 3 fund balance. I think fund balance would be and very useful and
of interest to Town Council. That's why we're going to talk about it today. Fund balance on exhibit 3, what does it mean and why is it useful for Town Council? If the balance remaining
after the assets have been used to satisfy outstanding liabilities. Another way to think about it from a Town Council simple perspective is, this is cash that you can be setting aside
for the future. It can be set up in one of these five categories. You should see on page 10, exhibit 3, that there's five categories there. There's nonspendable, which is assets that
can't be spent in current form. That's lease deposits, prepaid costs, and inventory. There's restricted fund balance, which is externally restricted by let's say the state or the grant
agency. That's where you have at the Town gas tax parking in lieu and E-Summons. Committed, now, this one is an interest to Town Council because it's Council designated. This is something
that the Council decided they wanted to take some assets, some cash, and set it aside for a certain purpose. General fund, as you can see on exhibit 3, doesn't have committed, but capital
projects fund does for those big multi-year projects that you all are working on. This is a particular interest to Town Council. Then there's also a category called assigned, which
is intended use. This is what you plan to do with it, but it isn't as formal as Council designated or externally restricted necessarily. It can be things like debt service reserve,
open purchase orders for big multi-year projects that you're working on. You want to set that cash aside. The last category is really of interest to Town Council, especially when you're
talking about budget and planning and capital projects and what direction you want the Town to go in, and that's unassigned fund balance. That is after you've got the non-spendable
and the restricted and the committed and the assigned, what's left? That's unassigned. How do you get at that number? What does it mean and how can Town Council use that is where we're
going to go with it now. You can see in this graph here, the graph shows you unassigned general fund balance, which is where you want to zone, focus in on. Last year, it was almost
15 million, this year, if we're going up to 23 million, how do you get that jump? What does it mean to have 23 million in general fund balance? On exhibit 3, go down to that bottom
line and keep your eye on that 39 million. Now, let's go to page 12 together. Page 12, if you go down to the bottom, you're going to see that 39 million again. We're going to come at
it from a different angle, and that's total fund balance. Now what we're going to do is we're going to drill down and we're going to look a little bit more at how you get there. This
is probably what you're seeing in page 12 as well. You've got revenue less expenditures, you get to 8 million. Then you take your non-operating items. Capital lease-funding received,
you've got transfers going in and out of general fund, and then you come down to what is called a net change in fund balance. That's like net income if you're a little bit familiar
with accounting lingo. That's net changing fund balance to 12 million. Then the Town was going to take that gas tax and they're going to restrict it so I'm backing it out. Then you've
got a revenue stabilization reserve of 2 million, we're going to back that out. From this perspective, Town Council's now seeing that unassigned fund balance really is more like 7.9.
Keep that number in your head, and we're going to go then back to page 10, and then I'm going to pull it together. 55 Item b. Page 8 | December 14, 2021 We've just worked through
revenue and expenditures so far. We're thinking unassigned fund balance that Town Council can be thinking about is 7.9 million. General unassigned fund balance last year was 14 million.
It's now 23 million unassigned. How did you get there? You add in that 7.9 million, that's new this year. Let's pull back in that revenue stabilization reserve. Then we're going to
take the change of nonspendable assigned committed. We're going to take the change there to get to the 23 million unassigned balance. You can start to see how these pieces fit together
between exhibit 3 and exhibit 5. How do you get from 14 million last year to 23 million this year? Then we can say, of that 23 million, what can Town Council start thinking about? What's
possible with this money that's leftover? Now you want to say, Town Council, we're going to set aside 2 million revenue stabilization reserve. Then what we're going to do is we've got
this policy that requires a 20% of expenditures unassigned fund balance minimum to be held back just in case that rainy day emergency idea. You're going to hold back 11.6 million. Then
what are you really left with as Town Council for the unassigned fund balance that you guys can talk about? Well, it's 9.6. Do you see how I got from a 23 million unassigned fund balance
on exhibit 3 down to what's really workable for Town Council, which is 9.6? Do you see how that process goes along? You want to keep that 20% minimum and you want to keep that revenue
stabilization reserved because that's really future forward-thinking. That's basically what I wanted to show you. It's pretty quick, but I wanted to get you starting to think about,
what is fund balance? What do these different categories mean? What's useful for you all when thinking about this stuff? Now would be a good time if you have questions. Again, there's
my contact information if you want to ask me further questions about any of it. Mayor Burk: Well, thank you very much. Does anyone have any questions at this point? I think we'll probably
have to take some time to look it over. Thank you for the contact information. I'm sure we will be using it. Ann Genova: Well, thank you for the opportunity to speak to you all. Mayor
Burk: Thank you. Clark Case: Mayor and Council, the Town staff are also available to meet with you at any time, or you may email us questions. This book is a very large thick book.
It's full of very interesting information. It tells you who the largest in employers are. It shows you the trends for all of our revenue and expenditures over the last 10 years. It
gives you a huge amount of information about the community. In the very front is a transmittal letter that explains the big picture about what happened to the Town in the last year.
Then it's followed by a management discussion and analysis that explains why certain things changed. I encourage you to take your time, look through it, do not hesitate to contact us
or Ann. Also included are a couple of required communications from the auditors, which are these two stapled items. These are things where they're talking about what they found in the
details of their audit. If you're interested in the details, that's what these tell you. Thank you for your time. Mayor Burk: All right. Thank you very much. Appreciate the information.
I'm sure we will be back in touch with you. [chuckles] That does take us now to the regional commission reports. Anybody have any--? The only one I have is that I attended the VML Conference,
VML Executive Committee that talked about the conference to a person at that meeting. They all went on about that was probably the best conference that has been held in years. They
were very grateful for Town staff for all the hard work that they did. Anybody else? All right. That takes us to our petitioner section. One of the first orders of businesses to hear
from the public. All members of the public are welcome to address the Council on any item that 56 Item b. Page 9 | December 14, 2021 matter or issue. Please, identify yourself, and
if comfortable doing so, give your address for the taped record. Any public speakers will be requested to state their name and spell it for the purpose of closed captioning. In the
interest of fairness, we also ask that you observe the three-minute timeline. The green light on the timer will turn yellow at the end of two minutes, indicating you have one minute
remaining. At that time, we do appreciate your summing up and yielding the floor when the bell indicates your time has expired. Under the rules of order adopted by this Council, the
five-minute time limit applies to all. Our first speaker for tonight is Jeff Carey followed by Paul Kershaw. Are either of them here tonight? All right. Are you here? Jeff Carey: I’m
here. Mayor Burk: Come up to the mic and make your three-minute comments. [pause] Jeff Carey: Good evening, Town Council. I just have a few comments I wanted to make on the COVID vaccine
mandate. I'll be presenting some data that I think should be taken into consideration in regard to the vaccine mandate. Can I pass these out? Mayor Burk: You may give them to the Clerk.
[pause] Jeff Carey: Oh, my time's already running. Mayor Burk: You need to go ahead. Jeff Carey: Can we restart? I don't think this is going to be enough time. I'll be presenting some
data that I think should be taken into consideration in regard to the vaccine mandate. I don't know if the Town Council has discussed a fund for the coverage of injuries resulting from
the vaccine. In their foresight, the Federal government has put together a $50-billion fund for any injuries resulting from the vaccine mandate for all Federal employees. Page one is
the FECA Bulletin from the US Department of Labor. I'll read briefly. However, this executive order now makes COVID vaccination a requirement of most Federal employees. As such, employees
impacted by this mandate who receive required COVID-19 vaccinations on or after the date of executive order may be afforded coverage under the FECA for any adverse reactions to the
vaccine itself, and for any injury sustained while obtaining the vaccination. If you turn to the first tab, you'll see that there's a study done by the New England Journal of Medicine.
There were 21 scientists and doctors involved in this study. It also involved the CDC V-safe COVID-19 Pregnancy Registry team. I think it's 47 members of the CDC. This was published
on April 21st. I don't know how this flew under the radar of the media. If you turn to the third tab, you'll see, in the underlying section, a total of 96 of 104 spontaneous abortions,
or 92.3% occurred before 13 weeks of gestation after these women received the COVID vaccine. If you turn to the fourth page, that is the COVID response registry team from CDC. If you
turn to the fourth tab, that is a stay that was issued by Dr. Michael Yeadon, who is the scientific lead for Pfizer Pharmaceuticals. If you turn to the last tab, he says specifically
in regards to the vaccine, "However, if this were to be the case, this would then also prevent the formation of placenta, which would result in vaccinated women essentially becoming
infertile." I think those things go hand in hand. Thank you. Mayor Burk: Thank you, Mr. Carey. Mr. Carey, do you spell your name J-E-F-F C-A-R-E-Y? Jeff Carey: Yes, ma'am. 57 Item b.
Page 10 | December 14, 2021 Mayor Burk: Thank you. Paul Kershaw is followed by Bill Fox. Paul Kershaw: Good evening, Madam Mayor, Council Members. Thank you for your time. My name
is Paul Kershaw. I'm here with the Virginia for Medical Freedom. Mayor Burk: Would you spell your name, please? Paul Kershaw: P-A-U-L K-E-R-S-H-A-W. Mayor Burk: Thank you. Paul Kershaw:
I came here to urge you to vote in favor of motion 13A to rescind the Town vaccine and testing mandate resolution 2021-154, passed by this chamber on October 12th. Since that time,
as I'm sure you're well, of the political landscape in Virginia has changed somewhat dramatically. Also, on the Federal level, on November 12th, the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth
Circuit reaffirmed its November 6th stay of enforcement and implementation of the Federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration's COVID-19 Vaccine Emergency Temporary Standard,
calling it, and I quote, "Fatally flawed and staggeringly overbroad". The Court stated COVID-19 does not pose a grave danger because the virus, which is widely present and not particular
to any workforce, and quote, "Non-life threatening to a vast majority of employees", does not arise to such a toxic or physically harmful substance, or agent contemplated by the Occupational
Safety and Health Act. On November 16th, a judicial panel of multidistrict litigation consolidated all petitions for review of the Emergency Temporary Standard before the US Court of
Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. On December 7th, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia issued a nationwide injunction of Executive Order 14042, which
sought to impose the vaccine mandate on Federal contractors across the country. The Court determined that the President never had authority under Federal procurement law to issue the
Executive Order in the first place. On December 12th, data obtained from Pfizer through a Freedom of Information Act request to the FDA revealed over 160,000 adverse effects of the
vaccine in just three months of testing, including a rate of cardiac arrest and congestive heart failure over four times that of patients receiving only a placebo. Adding credence to
reports widely available through the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System of hundreds of thousands of serious effects. Externally, the FDA is now requesting up to 75 years to release
all of this data publicly. At this point in time, COVID-19 vaccines have been available to anyone and everyone that wishes to take it. If persons can no longer freely decide what is
done to their own bodies and they are subject to arbitrary mandates by local governing authorities, then they are no longer persons. They are slaves. Mayor Burk: Thank you, Mr. Kershaw.
Bill Fox is followed by Ron Campbell. Bill Fox: My name is Bill Fox, B-I-L-L F-O-X. I'm glad we had some people providing data because I think these types of decisions should be made
with data. I'd like to-- you're not going to answer me of course, but think to yourselves, did you review any data whatsoever before making this decision? Normally, on things like this,
staff provides you with reams of data before you make an important decision like this. Here they only provided you with one piece of data. Here's the number of people who are not vaccinated
yet. That was it. You made your whole decision based on the fact that some people were not already vaccinated. This entire decision is based on a fundamental misunderstanding on what
the various COVID remediations actually do. They're all effective. Masking is effective. Social distancing is effective and vaccines are effective at doing specific things. Masks are
effective if worn in communities to slow down the spread of the COVID virus, so does 58 Item b. Page 11 | December 14, 2021 social distancing. That is not what vaccines do. The vaccine
remediates the impact of the symptoms of the COVID infection. It does not prevent the spread of the virus. In fact, it doesn't even slow down the spread of the virus. There's a ten
percent difference, so you have a 67% chance of spreading the virus to somebody in close contact if you're unvaccinated, a 57% chance if you're vaccinated. That's only initially right
after the vaccine, after 90 days, there's zero difference. Vaccinated and unvaccinated populations spread the COVID virus, particularly the Delta variant at the exact same rates. Are
you going to mandate every three months that people get vaccinated? Are you going to oversee that program? Because right now, anybody in this room who had their vaccination more than
three months ago is exactly as likely to pass the virus onto you as somebody who has not been vaccinated. It's the exact same. This policy accomplishes zero, nothing, and you've created
all of this strife in the workplace to accomplish literally nothing. You'd know that if you read the data. The studies that I'm quoting to you aren't stuff that came out last week.
These studies were available in October. Did you look at those studies? Did you literally look at any of the data on vaccines and the effectiveness of stopping the spread of the virus?
Mayor Burk: Thank you, Mr. Fox. Mr. Campbell is followed by Jenny Hall. Ron Campbell: Good evening. I am here tonight because decisions matter and they have generational consequences.
As a former member of this body, I understood that the oath I took was a sacred oath, not just to care when it was convenient or care when it was just politically convenient for a crony
or friend, but to care for all of the people all the time. The decision we've made in regards to zoning and changes have had some awesome and some terrible consequences for many in
the community that are here tonight. Those are not just housing decisions. Those are human decisions that we make that impact education, healthcare, jobs, a responsibility that doesn't
just get decided, "Oh, this is for the County. Oh, this is for the Town". Where's your leadership when it comes to your people, your residents? Who deserve a better than a fair chance
to live, to prosper, to grow. The responsibility doesn't stop because you wrote a letter. It stops when the problem is solved, and you'll go to any end to solve your own family's problems,
but you won't go to any end to solve the problems that are here tonight. This isn't about affordable housing that doesn't exist. It's called attainable housing. At what level is housing
attainable? I'm glad we spend a minute talking about data. Do you understand the data of poverty in the Town of Leesburg? Where people spend over 80% of their income on housing costs
that they've lost 46% of their income in the last two years. These aren't poor people. These are rich people. They happen to be victims of a circumstance and now they happen to be victims
of a circumstance that was orchestrated by a policy in this Town, that allows their housing to be sold out from under them. Where do you think they can afford to go? You don't have
a solution. Nobody has a solution. We have options that we seriously need to talk about. Don't talk about them because we like the person in front of us and we don't like the person
in front of us who can offer a solution. Now is the time to come together. Can you imagine the mental frustration and the anguish during what we call this holiday season on these children,
these parents, these grandparents, these families? Someone like a Chair of the Board of Supervisor will say, "Well, it's convenient for us to talk about this in January." The truth
is never convenient, someone even wrote a book about it, that inconvenient truth. The truth tonight is it's your job, is your responsibility, take it and do something for these lives.
Mayor Burk: Thanks. Mr. Campbell, would you spell your name for closed captioning? I didn't catch you at the beginning. 59 Item b. Page 12 | December 14, 2021 Ron Campbell: Ron, R-O-N
Campbell, C-A-M-P-B-E-L-L. Mayor Burk: Thank you very much. Mr. Campbell is followed by Jenny Hall and Jenny Hall is followed by Bonnie McLean. Jenny Hall: Jenny Hall, J-E-N-N-Y H-A-L-L.
I've had to pivot what I was going to speak to you tonight, but you stated that many employees are supporting you in your vaccine mandate. That's great. I'd like more transparency in
regard to what departments and when they said it, and if that makes you uncomfortable, you shouldn't ask the unvaxxed to disclose their information. The voice of those who are vaxxed
do not negate the percentage who you've silenced because they are afraid of speaking out. We're talking about 97%. What are you trying to do 3% to get to 100? What is the end goal?
Six months science says the vaccines wane. What are you going to do when they need another one? Are you going to oversee that? This is insanity. Why do you need to mandate 3% of people
to do something they may or may not want to do right now. It doesn't mean they won't do it in the future. It means they don't want to do it on your timeline. Now I'm going to talk to
those that this affects because that's what I originally was going to talk to. I am sorry to those that this is affecting and employees to those who have resigned, I and many others
support you. If you need work, if you are looking for positions, please email your resumes, because I will send them to as many people as I can. To those who haven't received a COVID
vaccine at this time, we're talking about 3%. Apparently, we don't care about the 3% but we care about the 3% of people that may have gotten COVID and become sick but we don't care
about 3% that use their own brains to decide what is right for them. If you don't decide to get this vaccine please know that you have rights in the workplace. Reach out to me and I
will send you the tools to submit for the exemptions that you are guaranteed access to. Mr. Cummings thinks that no one is going to submit for those, but I will support and give the
tools to people who will submit those exemptions. I am disappointed with this Council but I am steadfast in what I've been saying to you since October. I will continue to show up for
this Town and the people whom you’ve put in positions to fear losing their jobs for a drug. To others who stand with me in this fight, the one viral thing we should share is kindness
with firm conviction. Mayor Burk: Ms. Hall, thank you very much. You're followed by Bonnie McLean followed by Vicente Gonzalez. Bonnie McLean: Bonnie McLean, B-O-N-N-I-E M-C-L-E-A-N.
Madam Mayor, Members of Council, I'm speaking in support of what was Motion 13A, which has since been removed from the agenda in support of rescinding resolution 2021-154. Vaccine mandates
like the one the Town of Leesburg has adopted present a crisis of conscience for many people of faith. The underlying attitude expressed earlier this evening seems dismissive of the
rights and freedoms of a minority. May I remind this body that the United States of America is a republic, not a democracy as a pledge we recited earlier? Equal rights for all are not
overruled by the majority. If the alleged 3% of the Town's employees were discriminated against were a certain skin color with that type of dismissive attitude and discrimination be
acceptable. Council Member Cummings mentioned something about complying with exemptions. I would like to point out that, to my knowledge, there is no law or ordinance that requires
or makes a demand for an exemption. The mandate is solely for the vaccination. There is no mandate for exemptions in existence anywhere on this Earth that I am aware of. I also remember
that this body made comments that seem to suggest that the Town intends on eventually getting rid of employees who have been granted exemptions. Based on your minutes of your October
12th meeting, I urge you to reconsider your discriminatory policy that puts those with religious 60 Item b. Page 13 | December 14, 2021 beliefs in the position of being pressure to
divulge details of their beliefs. The First Amendment didn't disappear overnight. It has also been reported that at least one employee has already won a lawsuit against their employer
over religious discrimination regarding the exemption issue. It was in six figures. Thank you. Mayor Burk: Ms. McLean is followed by Vicente González followed by Marianna González.
Vicente González: Good evening. My name is Vicente Gonzalez. V-I-C-E-N-T-E G-O-N-Z-Á-L-E-Z. I'm here today. I'm a resident of the Leesburg Mobile Home Park. I want to share a statement
from my community to you guys. On behalf of the Leesburg Mobile Park, we'd like to say thank you for your time and attention over the past three months. We are still extremely concerned
about the future of the Leesburg Mobile Park and the likelihood of losing our homes to the redevelopment. Any type of move would be very costly to our community. We will continue to
hope that the Town, as well as the County, will work with the new buyer and with us, the homeowners, to find a solution that is in the best interest of the Leesburg Mobile Park residents.
Thank you for your time. Mayor Burk: Thank you, Mr. González. Marianna González followed by Sarah Richardson. Mariana González: Hi, my name is Marianna González, M-A-R-I-A-N-A G-O-N-Z-Á-L-E-Z.
I am 15. Mayor Burk: Mariana, could you speak up a little louder? It's hard to hear you. Mariana Martinez: I am 15 years old. I live in 78 Leesburg Mobile Park with my four siblings
and two parents. I've been living there for 13 years and it's the only home that I've ever lived in and known well and enjoyed being in. It's the only home that I would want to stay
in. I want to stay in our house because we have everything there. Everything is close. The stores, the places we go to hang out. We can walk to the grocery stores because of how close
it is. All our friends and families live nearby, so we don't have to worry about not being able to see them. It would be hard to leave because I would have to change schools, make new
friends, and starting our whole lives over again would be really hard on us. My family and I feel safe in our community and we wouldn't want to leave. We hope that the buyer will work
together with the Town and the County to find a solution that will help the families in the Leesburg Mobile Home Park. Thank you for your time and for listening to what I have to say.
Mayor Burk: Thank you. Mariana is followed by Sarah Richardson. Who's followed by Paul Coyer. Sarah Richardson: Sarah Richardson. S-A-R-A-H. Richardson, R-I-C-H-A-R-D-S-O-N. Good evening,
Mayor Burk and Members of the Council. I am president of the Virginia Knolls Community Association. You will find my neighborhood of 140 attached Townhouses, just east of Harrison Street
and Catoctin Circle. It dates to 1966 and so has very limited parking. I am here to talk about the proposed Virginia Village redevelopment. I lived for two decades in New York City
without a car, so I know how easy carless living can be when there is a bus or subway running frequently nearby. In 2009, I lost my job and was offered a job in Leesburg. My first year
I lived above what is now Black Hoof Brewing on King Street, but I could duplicate my urban walk-everywhere lifestyle. I discovered how far it is to walk with groceries from Safeway
up the hill on King Street. I discovered how long a walk it is from King and Market to Ida Lee. In 2010, I bought a home in Virginia Knolls, which I chose for its walkability, which
was roughly the same as what I experienced on King Street. I could walk to many places, but I could not walk to my job, gatherings outside the intercore, medical appointments and many
cultural retail and recreational 61 Item b. Page 14 | December 14, 2021 venues. My point is that a suburban environment cannot morph into a high-density, urban-style community by
rezoning alone. It takes a lot of effective mass transit to make it work. Lacking that here is my worry. Imagine you are a couple living in a one-bedroom unit in the new Virginia Village.
You have one dedicated space for a car. Why wouldn't you decide to park your second car on nearby streets? Which my community of Virginia Knolls relies on for parking rather than deal
with a time-restricted onsite access to parking the developer proposes. I support environmentally responsible developments. I also take my responsibility to my community seriously.
The Virginia redevelopment plan proposes a 30% reduction in required onsite parking. That cut total 280 spaces, as I understand. Consider how that could affect us, the community with
street parking that is closest to these densely populated buildings. As one of our residents wrote, the Planning Commission's objections are quite valid. The proposed increase in residential
units combined with reduction parking makes no sense. I live in the neighborhood of Virginia Knolls, which I feel quite certain will turn into the overflow parking area. I could go
on, but I think I've made my point. I thank you for your time. Please, consider our concerns. We are so close to this development. Thank you. Mayor Burk: Thank you. Ms. Richardson followed
by Paul Coyer. Is Paul not here? Paul Coyer: Sorry. I heard you say her name first. My name is Paul Coyer. I'm a professor and a historian and resident of Leesburg. As you all know
by now, I was voted on the Balch Library Advisory Commission back in October. The same night you voted in the Vax Mandate. I understand this cause a bit of frustration on your part
to hear about it again tonight, but unfortunately, you're going to hear more. As I mentioned the last time I spoke to you in this topic, there was a significant and growing body of
scientific data that undermines claims of both the efficacy and the safety of the vax can be efficacious in some instances. The data is worrisome. One point is that, to date, there
have been more adverse events reported for these COVID vaccines than for all 70-plus vaccines combined since they started tracking adverse events 30 years ago. That is a data point
that I think should give most people pause. I'm going to repeat what I heard Bill Fox ask, whether or not you all had considered this data point or any other significant data points
when he made this decision. I suspect the answer is no. According to research published by the New England Journal of Medicine on what little data has been made available from the Pfizer
trial, the trial showed that the drug can save one life for every 22,000 people vaccinated. It also appeared from the trial that the drug killed more people than it saved. There were
actually 20 deaths in the treatment group versus 14 in placebo after unwinding. That's worrisome as well, I would say. A group of scientists, professors, and medical professionals want
the FDA to release data that led to the licensing of Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine. In response, Pfizer requested that the FDA keep the data from its human trials secret until 2076. That's
55 years. It wants to change FOIA laws so that it does not have to respond to FOIA requests for those 55 years. Does that sound like a biopharmaceutical firm confident in its data?
Again, that's a rhetorical question. This is the same company that in 2009 received the largest fine in US history for, "Bribing doctors and suppressing adverse trial results." That's
just one of many, many such horror stories I could tell. The FDA took only 108 days to approve the Pfizer shot, and yet wants more than half a century to make the trial info upon which
it depended for that decision open to the public. We have a growing body of court decisions which have been addressed already. I'm not going to repeat all of those, but suffice it to
say the legal environment for these decisions is questionable at best. I would like to end by repeating what one of the previous speakers said. The issue that she raised was quite pertinent,
that our government was founded not to protect the tyranny of the majority, but to protect the rights of the minority. We have a minority here who has decided that they know what's
best for their body and for their health, and that the government shouldn't decide for them. That's something I think that should be respected, and I would urge you guys to rescind
this mandate. 62 Item b. Page 15 | December 14, 2021 Mayor Burk: Mr. Coyer, would you please spell your name for the close captioning? Paul Coyer: C-O-Y-E-R. Paul is P-A-U-L. Mayor
Burk: Thank you. Is there anybody in the audience that did not sign up that would like to speak at this point? No one's come forward, so I will close this petitioner section. That takes
us to the consent agenda. I will read the items on the consent agenda then ask for a motion and a second. "Approval of the consent agenda A, 12A 2021 Tree City USA Application. B, Second
Amendment to Hospital Tank Antennae Lease T-Mobile. C, Creek Valley Buffer and Flood Plain Regulatory Amendments. D, Replacement of Biological Nutrient Reactor Split Box Gates at Water
Pollution Control Facility. E, Exterior Building Cleaning and Sealant at the Water Pollution Control Facility. F, Replacement of the Radiator on the Standby Generator at the Water Pollution
Control Facility. G, Demolition, and Replacement of the Digestive Motor Control Center at the Water Pollution Control Facility. H, Payment Resurfacing Cornwall Street at King to Memorial.
I, Appointment to Bull Run Alcohol Safety Action Program Policy Board and appoint Matthew Abate to the Police Citizens Task Force. Is there anything anybody wants removed? Is there
a motion? Vice Mayor Martinez: So moved. Mayor Burk: Moved by Vice Mayor Martinez. Second? Seconded by Council Member Bagdasarian. All in favor? Council Members: Aye. Mayor Burk: Opposed?
That passes 7-0. The next item we have is a resolution. This resolution is the renaming of Harry Byrd highway within the Town of Leesburg Corporate Limits to Leesburg Pike. Do I have
a motion? Vice Mayor Martinez: So moved. Mayor Burk: So moved by Council Member Martinez, seconded by Council Member Steinberg. Is there a presentation on this item? Kaj Dentler: Only
if Council want it. It's very brief. Mayor Burk: Do we want a presentation? Okay, I just would like to say that this is coming forward after the County has already voted on this and
sent it to the General Assembly for approval to change. If we don't want a presentation tonight, anybody have any questions? Mr. Martinez. Vice Mayor Martinez: I just want to say that
even though I voted the motion, I'm not going to support it. Thank you. Mayor Burk: All right. Renaming the Harry Byrd Highway within the Town Corporate Limits to Leesburg Pike. Mr.
Martinez made the motion, it was seconded by Mr. Steinberg. All in favor indicate by saying, "Aye". Council Members: Aye. Mayor Burk: Opposed? Vice Mayor Martinez: Nay. Mayor Burk:
All right, that's six-one. I'm sorry. Thank you. You guys are so quick to catch. Good. Any future meeting agendas? Ms. Nacy, anything you want to future? Council Member Nacy: No. I
don't think. Do you want--? 63 Item b. Page 16 | December 14, 2021 Mayor Burk: Yes, you're right. We should be doing disclosures too, okay. Mr. Bagdasarian? Council Member Bagdasarian:
Yes. Since we're going to have another work session on the Virginia Village project, I'd like for the EDC to weigh in on the economic impact, their perspective on this for our next
work session, along with the economic development directors' follow-up. Mayor Burk: The only problem is we're not having a work session. The motion that was made last night was that
we would immediately have a vote, it would be on the agenda for a vote. You can ask for their input to be given to us but it won't go to a work session for discussion. Council Member
Bagdasarian: I would like their input to be submitted along with the economic development directors' follow-up in advance of the meeting. Mayor Burk: Is that it? Council Member Bagdasarian:
That's it. Mayor Burk: Any disclosures? Anything? Council Member Bagdasarian: No. Mayor Burk: Okay. Ms. Fox. Council Member Fox: I have a disclosure. I met with Brian Cullen about the
Virginia Village rezoning application last Friday, and I do have one thing to add to the next agenda. I'd like to add the motion to rescind resolution 2021-154. I’d like to add that
to the January 11th regular meeting. Mayor Burk: All right. Mr. Steinberg? Council Member Steinberg: [unintelligible] Mayor Burk: Mr. Cummings? Council Member Cummings: Two disclosures.
I had phone conversations with Brian Cullen and Andrew Painter on the Virginia Village Rezoning on the 9th and the 13th, and then I also had a meeting on the 13th with Molly Novotny
and Colleen Gillis with Cooley, and it was just an overview of some of their clients' properties here in the Town. Mayor Burk: Okay, Mr. Martinez? Vice Mayor Martinez: [unintelligible].
Mayor Burk: All right. On November 26th, I joined the other elected officials to officially open the Holiday Road Show at Morven Park. That was a spectacular live show and if you get
the opportunity to attend, please do. Congratulations to Director Stacey Metcalfe and the Morven Park board for this great show. November 28th, I was honored to recognize Katherine
Burch, who lives in Morningside and who turned 100 years old. She came into the room dancing and loved all the attention. She really loved Chief Brown. It was great that the staff at
Morningside was so welcoming, it was great fun, and happy birthday to Katherine. December 1st, I participated in lighting the Menorah at the Sha'are Shalom synagogue, thanks to Rabbi
Tow and the Congregation for the warm welcome. December 3th, Members Fox, Nacy, and Steinberg along with Vice Mayor Martinez and Congresswoman Wexton joined me for the celebration of
the tree lighting here in Town. Maggie, Sam, Caleb, and Savannah joined us and pulled the lever to light the tree. It was a great event. Another hard job made to look easy by Parks
and Rec staff and the Street Crews that did the decorating on the bucket truck. 64 Item b. Page 17 | December 14, 2021 December 3rd, I presented a proclamation to Caldwell Banker,
realtors for 10 years at their present location and 30 years in Leesburg. December 4th and 5th, the Parks and Rec held an annual Arts and Craft Show. I did most of my shopping there.
It's a great place to get a gift for you or for others, and I look forward to it every year, and Parks and Rec did a great job of putting it together as always. December 4th, I participated
in George Marshall house lighting, tree lighting. They have trees for every country that was in the Marshall Plan. They decorate them and light them every year. It's a really very pretty
walk and if you get the chance, walk the path in the evening and look at the trees. December 5th participated in the lighting of the Menorah for the Chabad of Loudoun County. Rabbi
Cohen is an amazing bundle of joy and movement and everyone was so generous and welcoming. December 8th and 9th, I attended the VML Executive Committee in Charlottesville. Congratulations
to our new police officers. The Christmas parade, while it had to be moved from Saturday to Sunday, again Parks and Rec did a great job of organizing it and reorganizing it for the
next day. Finally, I spoke before the County Public Hearing on the airport noise overlay for the Leesburg Airport. The County is looking to do away with the one-mile overlay district
that requires homeowners to be notified that they're living near an airport and there will be noise associated with their location. Merry Christmas and happy holidays to everyone. Town
Manager, do you have? Kaj Dentler: No comment. Mayor Burk: Okay, then we're going to go into a closed session. Pending legislation, annexation, and/or boundary line agreement with respect
to the JLMA, so I move pursuant to 2.2-3711(A)(7) and 2.23711(A)(8) to the Code of Virginia that the Leesburg Town Council convene in a closed meeting for the purpose of consultation
with legal counsel and briefings by staff members pertaining to pending legislation in the Town of Leesburg et al. versus Loudoun County et al. Loudoun County Circuit Court number 19-1768
where said consultation is open session would adversely affect the negotiating and litigating posture of Town and consulting with the legal counsel regarding the specific legal matters
require supervision of legal advice by said counsel and pertaining to the potential annexation and boundary line agreement with respect to the JLMA. Is there a second? Vice Mayor Martinez:
Second. Mayor Burk: Seconded by Vice Mayor Martinez. All in favor. Council Members: Aye. Mayor Burk: Opposed. That passes 7-0. All right. Everyone leaves the room at this point. COUNCIL
WENT INTO A CLOSED SESSION FROM 8:08 P.M. to 8:34 P.M. Mayor Burk: Alright. In accordance with Section § 2.2-3712 of the Code of Virginia, I move that Council certify to the best of
each member’s knowledge, only public business matters lawfully exempt from the open meeting requirement under Virginia Freedom of Information Act and such public business matters for
the purpose identified in the motion by which the closed meeting was convened were heard, discussed and considered by Council. Mayor Burk: Ms. Fox? Council Member Fox: Aye. Mayor Burk:
Mr. Steinberg? Council Member Steinberg: Aye. Mayor Burk: Mr. Cummings? 65 Item b. Page 18 | December 14, 2021 Council Member Cummings: Aye. Mayor Burk: Vice Mayor? Vice Mayor Martinez:
Aye. Mayor Burk: Mr. Bagdasarian? Council Member Bagdasarian: Aye. Mayor Burk: Ms. Nacy? Council Member Nacy: Aye. Mayor Burk: And Mayor Burk, aye. Do I have a motion to adjourn? Vice
Mayor Martinez: So moved. Mayor Burk: Second. All in favor? Council Members: Aye. Mayor Burk: We’re done. 66 Item b. Date of Council Meeting: January 11, 2022 TOWN OF LEESBURG
TOWN COUNCIL MEETING Subject: Regional Surface Transportation Program Funding for the Route 15 Bypass Interchange at Edwards Ferry Road and Fort Evans Road Project Staff Contact: Renee
M. LaFollette, P.E., Director, Public Works and Capital Projects Calvin K. Grow, Transportation Engineer, Public Works and Capital Projects Council Action Requested: Adoption of a
resolution of support requesting Regional Surface Transportation Program Funding in the amount of $2 Million from the Northern Virginia Transportation Authority for Fiscal Year 2028
for the Route 15 Bypass Interchange at Edwards Ferry Road and Fort Evans Road Project. Staff Recommendation: Adoption of a resolution of support requesting Regional Surface Transportation
Program Funding in the amount of $2 Million from the Northern Virginia Transportation Authority for Fiscal Year 2028 for the Route 15 Bypass Interchange at Edwards Ferry Road and Fort
Evans Road Project. Commission Recommendation: Not applicable. Fiscal Impact: The Route 15 Bypass/Edwards Ferry Road Interchange project will be administered by the Virginia Department
of Transportation (VDOT). The estimated cost of the Route 15 Bypass/Edwards Ferry Road Interchange project is approximately $185 million. Typically, projects with large budgets will
require participation from multiple funding sources. To date, the Town has been awarded $7.4 million in Northern Virginia Transportation Authority (NVTA) 70% regional funds for preparation
of the Interchange Justification Report and design. The Town will request $2 million with this application. Applications from localities are generally accepted six fiscal years before
award. NVTA is now requesting applications from localities for Fiscal Year 2028. This project is currently significantly underfunded, and these funds will be accrued with other awards
to close the funding gap. The allocation of available federal funding is based on the Town’s population and the relationship of the Town’s population to that of Loudoun County. This
determines the apportionment of the available regional federal funds. NVTA advised the Town that its Fiscal Year 2028 allocation is anticipated to be $2 million. If the Town receives
$2 million in Fiscal Year 2028, those funds will become available to the project September 1, 2027. Work Plan Impact: This application is part of the current work plan for the Department
of Public Works and Capital Projects. 67 Item a. Regional Surface Transportation Program Funding for the Route 15 Bypass Interchange at Edwards Ferry Road and Fort Evans Road Project
January 11, 2022 Page 2 Executive Summary: The estimated cost of the Route 15 Bypass/Edwards Ferry Road Interchange project is $185 million. To date, the Northern Virginia Transportation
Authority (NVTA) has awarded $7.4 million in funding for the preparation of a required Interchange Justification Report and 30% design. This design in underway by the Virginia Department
of Transportation (VDOT). Additionally, a total of $13.1 million of state and federal funds have been programmed to this project in future outyears. A Resolution from Town Council
endorsing this request is required as part of the application to the NVTA. Background: The Route 15 Bypass/Edwards Ferry Road Interchange project is included in the Town Plan, the
Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) Six-Year Plan, the Northern Virginia Regional Transit Authority (NVTA) TransAction Plan adopted November 2012 Plan, and the Town’s Fiscal
Year 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Under agreements with the Town, VDOT is administering this project due to its size and complexity. Even though VDOT will be administering
this project, the Town is responsible for securing the needed funding. Town staff will be actively involved throughout the design and construction of this project. The Route 15 Bypass
is a 4-lane divided arterial highway and is part of the National Highway System. In addition to local traffic, Route 15 serves as a major commuter route for residents from northern
Loudoun County, Maryland, and Pennsylvania traveling to employment centers in eastern Loudoun County, Fairfax County, and points further east. The existing at-grade intersections at
Edwards Ferry Road and Fort Evans Road represent two of the three remaining signalized intersections on the Leesburg Bypass. Both intersections serve large retail centers and many
other smaller stores and restaurants. The short separation between these two intersections and the minimal distance to the adjacent Route 7 (East Market Street) interchange exacerbate
the traffic issues. This intersection becomes congested on a daily basis due to commuters, and on weekends and during holiday seasons due to the adjacent retail facilities. A new
interchange is proposed to elevate the Route 15 Bypass over both Edwards Ferry Road and Fort Evans Road, to provide interchange ramps, and to provide a frontage road system connecting
the two roadways. A public information meeting was held on February 27, 2017. On May 8, 2017, Town Council endorsed this interchange concept per Town Resolution 2018-091. Since that
endorsement, VDOT and the Town have continued to make progress on the project and have met or exceeded deadlines that were established as part of the committed schedule. The following
steps have been completed or are planned: Interchange Justification Report (IJR) has been approved by VDOT and the Town Council. 30% plans, associated with the IJR have been approved.
Environmental documentation has been approved by the Federal Highway Administration. Land acquisition of the southwest quadrant property for the ultimate interchange. 68 Item
a. Regional Surface Transportation Program Funding for the Route 15 Bypass Interchange at Edwards Ferry Road and Fort Evans Road Project January 11, 2022 Page 3 Design Public Hearing
was held on May 31, 2018. Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB) approved the Limited Access Control Change on April 10, 2019. Final design and construction will be scheduled after
funding is secured. Town staff and VDOT are working together to investigate possible phased project delivery. Final design and construction will be scheduled after all funding is
secured Proposed Legislation: RESOLUTION Endorsing a Request in the amount of $2 Million for Regional Surface Transportation Program Funding from the Northern Virginia Transportation
Authority for Fiscal Year 2028 for the Route 15 Bypass Interchange at Edwards Ferry Road and Fort Evans Road Project Draft Motions: 1. I move to approve the proposed resolution endorsing
a request for Regional Surface Transportation Program Funding from the Northern Virginia Transportation Authority for Fiscal Year 2028 for the Route 15 Bypass Interchange at Edwards
Ferry Road and Fort Evans Road Project. 2. I move to deny the proposed resolution endorsing a request for Regional Surface Transportation Program Funding from the Northern Virginia
Transportation Authority for Fiscal Year 2028 for the Route 15 Bypass Interchange at Edwards Ferry Road and Fort Evans Road Project. OR 3. I move an alternate motion. Attachments:
1. Draft Resolution 2. Route 15 Bypass/Edwards Ferry Road Interchange CIP sheet 3. Route 15 Bypass/Edwards Ferry Road Interchange Concept Drawing 4. Town Resolution 2018-091 endorsing
Interchange Concept 5. Loudoun County Applications for FY2028 CMAQ and RSTP Program Fund Allocation Rev. 05/27/2021 69 Item a. PRESENTED: January 11, 2022 RESOLUTION NO. 2022- ADOPTED:
_______________ A RESOLUTION : ENDORSING A REQUEST IN THE AMOUNT OF $2 MILLION FOR REGIONAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM FUNDING FROM THE NORTHERN VIRGINIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2028 FOR THE ROUTE 15 BYPASS INTERCHANGE AT EDWARDS FERRY ROAD AND FORT EVANS ROAD PROJECT WHEREAS, The Federal Highway Administration provides highway improvement
funding annually through its Regional Surface Transportation Program (RSTP); and WHEREAS, selection of projects to receive RSTP funding in northern Virginia is made by the Commonwealth
Transportation Board, based on an endorsement from the Northern Virginia Transportation Authority (NVTA); and WHEREAS, NVTA has requested funding requests for RSTP funding for Fiscal
Year 2028; and WHEREAS, The Town of Leesburg’s Capital Improvement Program project to design and construct a grade separated interchange at the existing signalized intersections
of the Route 15 Bypass with Edwards Ferry Road and Fort Evans Road will require additional funding for design, right-of-way acquisition, utility relocations, and construction; and
WHEREAS, the estimated amount of RSTP funds available to the Town of Leesburg for eligible projects in Fiscal Year 2028 is approximately $2,000,000. THEREFORE, RESOLVED, by the
Council of the Town of Leesburg in Virginia as follows: 1. The Town Council supports this funding request to the Northern Virginia Transportation Authority for Fiscal Year 2028 Regional
Surface Transportation 70 Item a. A RESOLUTION: ENDORSING A REQUEST IN THE AMOUNT OF $2 MILLION FOR REGIONAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM FUNDING FROM THE NORTHERN VIRGINIA TRANSPORTATION
AUTHORITY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2028 FOR THE ROUTE 15 BYPASS INTERCHANGE AT EDWARDS FERRY ROAD AND FORT EVANS ROAD PROJECT -2- Program funding totaling $2,000,000 for the Route 15 Bypass
Interchange at Edwards Ferry Road and Fort Evans Road project. 2. The Town hereby grants authority for the Town Manager to apply for funds and execute project administration agreements,
as well as other documents necessary for receipt of funding. PASSED this 11th day of January, 2022. ______________________________ Kelly Burk, Mayor Town of Leesburg
ATTEST: ______________________________ Clerk of Council 71 Item a. TITLE: Route 15 Bypass/Edwards Ferry Road Interchange (09307) STATUS: Ongoing LOCATION: Edwards Ferry Road/Route
15 Leesburg Bypass intersection PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: The project consists of the development of a new grade-separated interchange on Edwards Ferry Road at the Route 15 Leesburg Bypass
and will include the intersection at Fort Evans Road. These two existing signalized at-grade intersections are heavily congested and have high accident rates. Route 15 serves as a major
commuter route, and there are numerous large retail developments in the area that generate significant traffic volumes. Currently, large volumes of pedestrian traffic cross the bypass
between the residential areas inside the bypass and the commercial development outside the bypass. OPERATING IMPACT: TBD GOAL ADDRESSED: 2012 Town Plan • The Transportation Corridor
Objectives calls for a grade-separated interchange at this location. • Transportation Objective calls for providing a safe, convenient, continuous, comfortable, and aesthetically pleasing
transportation environment that promotes bicycling and walking. PROJECT START ESTIMATED COMPLETION TBD TBD Significant Dates Funding Sources Sources Total Required Project Funding Funded
through 6/30/21 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Total for 6 Yr CIP Future Funds Required GO Bonds $470,400 $170,400 - $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $300,000 PAY-GO 160,000
100,000 60,000 - - - - - 60,000 State- NVTA 70% 9,585,000 9,585,000 - - - - - - - County- NVTA 30% 26,800 26,800 - - - - - - - State- VDOT 173,776,600 - - - - 6,061,600 1,742,000
2,000,000 9,803,600 163,973,000 Total Sources $184,018,800 $9,882,200 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $6,121,600 $1,802,000 $2,060,000 $10,163,600 $163,973,000 Planned Uses Uses
Total Project Cost Expended through 6/30/21 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Total for 6 Yr CIP Future Project Cost Project Management $942,200 $582,200 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000
$60,000 $60,000 $360,000 Land 13,389,000 4,000,000 - - - - 414,000 2,000,000 2,414,000 6,975,000 Design/ Engineering 12,689,600 5,300,000 - - - 6,061,600 1,328,000 - 7,389,600
Construction 156,998,000 - - - - - - - - 156,998,000 Total Uses $184,018,800 $9,882,200 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000 $6,121,600 $1,802,000 $2,060,000 $10,163,600 $163,973,000 Operating
Impact Operating/Maintenance 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 N/A — — — — — — Total Impact — — — — — — Streets and Highways Capital Improvements Program Town of Leesburg, VA
- 203 - FY 2022 Adopted Budget 72 Item a. 73Item a. 74Item a. 75 Item a. 76 Item a. 77Item a. Date of Council Meeting: January 11, 2022 TOWN OF LEESBURG TOWN COUNCIL MEETING Subject:
Requesting Virginia Department of Transportation to Accept Certain Streets Staff Contact: Renee M. LaFollette, P.E., Director of Public Works and Capital Projects Calvin K. Grow, Transportation
Engineer, Public Works and Capital Projects Council Action Requested: Adopt a resolution requesting Virginia Department of Transportation to add 1.88 miles of recently completed public
streets as shown on the attached list to the Urban Highway System in order for the Town to receive state maintenance payments. Staff Recommendation: Adopt a resolution requesting
Virginia Department of Transportation to add the streets shown on the attached list to the Urban Highway System in order for the Town to receive state maintenance payments. Commission
Recommendation: None. Fiscal Impact: No fiscal impact in Fiscal Year 2022. If the listed lane mileage is added to the Virginia Department of Transportation’s Urban Highway System
for maintenance, the Town is anticipated to receive an additional $24,862.44 annually to maintain the additional 1.88 lane miles of roadway beginning in Fiscal Year 2023. These funds
will be used to help offset the associated recurring Town costs for maintenance. Based on the lane miles Town-wide increasing from 266.73 to 268.61, the resulting total annual maintenance
funds from the Virginia Department of Transportation for Fiscal Year 2023 for all Town streets is anticipated to be $4,055,111.72. Work Plan Impact: Street maintenance is part of
the work plan for the Department of Public Works and Capital Projects. Executive Summary: In order for the Town to receive maintenance funding for the newly completed 1.88 lane miles
of streets within the Meadowbrook Farm neighborhood, the Town Council must adopt a resolution requesting the Virginia Department of Transportation add these streets to the Urban Highway
System for maintenance payments. Background: Requests to the Virginia Department of Transportation for additional street maintenance payments are due in February 2022 in order for
the streets to be eligible for maintenance payments at the beginning of Fiscal Year 2023. Per the attachment map (See Attachment #2), the following four streets within the Meadowbrook
Farm neighborhood are ready for acceptance: 1. Laconian Street SE (Athena Drive to Coubertin Drive) 78 Item b. Requesting Virginia Department of Transportation to Accept Certain Streets
January 11, 2022 Page 2 2. Athena Drive SE (Coubertin Drive to Laconian Street) 3. Akan Street SE (Athena Drive to Coubertin Drive) 4. Themis Street SE (Athena Drive to Coubertin
Drive) Attached is the required Virginia Department of Transportation’s form (See Attachment #3) and Council Resolution required by the Virginia Department of Transportation for the
request. Proposed Legislation: RESOLUTION Requesting the Virginia Department of Transportation to Accept Certain Streets Draft Motions: 1. I move to approve the proposed resolution
requesting the Virginia Department of Transportation to add streets shown on the attached list to the Urban Highway System for maintenance payments. 2. I move to deny the proposed
resolution requesting the Virginia Department of Transportation to add streets shown on the attached list to the Urban Highway System for maintenance payments. OR 3. I move an alternate
motion. Attachments: 1. Draft Resolution 2. Map 3. VDOT U-1 Form Rev. 05/27/2021 79 Item b. 07/30/2021 PRESENTED: January 11, 2022 RESOLUTION NO. 2022- ADOPTED: _______________
A RESOLUTION : REQUESTING THE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO ACCEPT CERTAIN STREETS WHEREAS, the Town is requesting the Virginia Department of Transportation to accept
certain streets; and WHEREAS, there are four streets that have recently been completed and are eligible to request maintenance payments; and WHEREAS, the streets being requested are:
Laconian Street SE (Athena Drive to Coubertin Drive) Athena Drive SE (Coubertin Drive to Laconian Street) Akan Street SE (Athena Drive to Coubertin Drive) Themis Street SE (Athena
Drive to Coubertin Drive) THEREFORE, RESOLVED, by the Council of the Town of Leesburg in Virginia hereby requests that the Virginia Department of Transportation accept the following
streets to the Urban Highway System for maintenance payments: 0.36 lane miles of Laconian Street SE (Athena Drive to Coubertin Drive) 0.76 lane miles of Athena Drive SE (Coubertin
Drive to Laconian Street) 0.38 lane miles of Akan Street SE (Athena Drive to Coubertin Drive) 0.38 lane miles of Themis Street SE (Athena Drive to Coubertin Drive) PASSED this
11th day of January, 2022. ______________________________ Kelly Burk, Mayor Town of Leesburg ATTEST: ______________________________ Clerk of Council 80 Item b. 81Item b.
2 Appendix B Form U-1 (rev. 7-1-17) MUNICIPALITY DISTRICT ACTION REQUIRED (SELECT
BELOW) STREET NAME ROUTE NUMBER R/W (Width) (FEET) PAVEMENT WIDTH (FEET) CENTER LANE (MILES) NUMBER OF LANES MOVING LANE MILES Eligibility Code Reference Link FUNC. CLASS.
(TMPD USE except for HR and NOVA) SELECT ONE 0.00 Select one ADD (New Road) Laconian Street SE 70 40' 0.18 2 0.36 Select one ADD (New Road) Athena Drive SE 70 36' 0.38 2 0.76 Select
one ADD (New Road) Akan Street SE 70 36' 0.19 2 0.38 Select one ADD (New Road) Themis Street SE 70 36' 0.19 2 0.38 Select one ADD (New Road) 0.00 Select one ADD (New Road) 0.00 Select
one ADD (New Road) 0.00 Select one ADD (New Road) 0.00 Select one ADD (New Road) 0.00 Select one SELECT ONE 0.00 Select one SELECT ONE 0.00 Select one SELECT ONE 0.00 Select one SELECT
ONE 0.00 Select one SELECT ONE 0.00 Select one SELECT ONE 0.00 Select one SELECT ONE 0.00 Select one SELECT ONE 0.00 Select one SELECT ONE TOTAL 4.44 Select one SIGNED
SIGNED CLASSIFIED BY Northern Virginia LOCAL ASSISTANCE DIVISION
VDOT
REQUEST FOR STREET ADDITION, DELETIONS AND CONVERSIONS FOR STREET PAYMENTS SECTION 33.2-319
CODE OF VIRGINIA * Council Resolution and Map Attached
MUNICIPAL OFFICIAL DATE Submit to: District Point of Contact in triplicate AUTHORIZED VDOT OFFICIAL DATE
T&MPD ENGINEER DATE Leesburg TO TERMINI FROM Athena Drive to Coubertin Drive Coubertin Drive to Laconian Street Athena Drive to Coubertin
Drive Athena Drive to Coubertin Drive 82 Item b. Date of Council Meeting: January 11, 2022 TOWN OF LEESBURG TOWN COUNCIL MEETING Subject: Appointment to the Commission on Public Art
Staff Contact: Eileen M. Boeing, CMC, Clerk of Council Council Action Requested: Consideration of an appointment of Leah Fallon to the Commission on Public Art. Staff Recommendation:
Not applicable. Commission Recommendation: Not applicable. Fiscal Impact: Section 2-197 of the Town Code provides for annual compensation of $1,350 for the Chair of the Commission
on Public Art and $1,200 for Commission on Public Art members. Funds are available within the current Fiscal Year 2022 general fund budget. Executive Summary: Two vacancies currently
exist on the Commission on Public Art. This appointment belongs to Council Member Kari Nacy. Background: The terms of office for Commissioners correspond to the term of the council
member who appointed them. The appointment of Leah Fallon is effective through December 2024. Membership on the Commission on Public Art may consist of town residents or town business
owners and at least four members shall be town residents. Ms. Fallon is a town resident and a business owner. Proposed Legislation: RESOLUTION Appointing Leah Fallon to the Commission
on Public Art Draft Motions: 1. I move to approve the proposed Resolution. 2. I move to deny the proposed Resolution. OR 3. I move an alternate motion. Attachments: 1. Draft
Resolution 2. Letter of Interest – L. Fallon 3. Resume – L. Fallon Rev. 05/27/2021 83 Item c. PRESENTED: January 11, 2022 RESOLUTION NO. 2022- ADOPTED: ______________ A RESOLUTION
: APPOINTING LEAH FALLON TO THE COMMISSION ON PUBLIC ART WHEREAS, participation by public-spirited citizens on town boards, commissions and committees is vital to the success of
town government and the democratic process; and WHEREAS, boards, commissions and committees serve an indispensable role in providing recommendations concerning town policy and programs;
and WHEREAS, Council desires to appoint effective individuals to serve at its will and pleasure on these advisory boards; and WHEREAS, terms of Boards and Commissions members correspond
to the term of the Council Member that nominated them, and WHEREAS, membership on the Commission on Public Art shall consist of town residents or town business owners, but at least
four must be residents of the town. Ms. Fallon is a town resident and business owner. THEREFORE, RESOLVED, that the Council of the Town of Leesburg in Virginia hereby appoints Leah
Fallon to the Commission on Public Art to a term ending December 31, 2024. PASSED this 11th day of January, 2022. ______________________________ Kelly Burk, Mayor Town of Leesburg
ATTEST: ______________________________ Clerk of Council 84 Item c. Leah Fallon 205 Jennings Court SE (415) 948-8057 leah@birchtreebookstore.com November 28, 2021 Leesburg Commision
on Public Arts 25 West Market Street Leesburg, VA 20176 Dear Leesburg Arts Council Boards, I have recently opened a bookstore in downtown Leesburg, Birch Tree Bookstore that sells new,
popular books for adults and kids. My bookstore hosts many events for the community such as book signings and talks, and activities for kids. Birch Tree Bookstore works to sell goods
from local makers, artists and authors. I opened Birch Tree Bookstore as a way to bring access to literature to Leesburg. I am passionate about inspiring children and adults into reading
and writing through hands-on and visual representations such as book fairs, festivals, little free libraries and book drives. I am interested in joining your board for the 2022 year
so I can help grow the representation of literature and authorship in Leesburg. Our town has so many talented and published authors, and I can help the council highlight them through
its work. Sincerely, 85 Item c. Leah Fallon Owner of Birch Tree Bookstore in Historic Downtown Leesburg, VA 205 Jennings Court SE Leesburg, VA 20175 (415) 9488-8057 leah@birchtreebookstore.com
WORK EXPERIENCE Birch Tree Bookstore,Leesburg, VA —owner April 2021 - present ● Sell new books for adults and children. ● Collaborates with local businesses. ● Supports local authors
and artists. finder.com,Brooklyn, NY —copyeditor October 2016 - August 2020 ● Fact-checked and copyedited articles related to finance. ● Collaborated and supported writers on projects
for publication. ● Loudoun County Public School,Loudoun, VA—Adult Education: Teacher of English Language Learners 2016 - 2018 ● Created lessons that followed the reading, writing, listening,
speaking standards for students at the first level. ● Encouraged confidence and risk taking in the classroom. Loudoun Now,Leesburg, VA—Copyeditor/Journalist 2015 - 2016 ● Edited final
pass for articles before they went to print. ● Interviewed local citizens and wrote stories for publication. Alameda Unified School District,Alameda, CA—6th,7th, and 7th grade teacher.
2006 - 2012 ● Created dynamic and culturally relevant middle school English Language Arts lessons in alignment with California ELA Standards for sixth, seventh and eighth grade. ●
Designed engaging ancient, middle age, and American history lessons through the integration of realia, technology, and collaborative hands-on projects. ● Implemented seventh grade Reading
Intervention Program, SKILLS Social media outreach. Canva designs. Wix website platform. Event planning. COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT Loudoun Shops Black–Founder.A website to help Loudouners
discover Black-owned businesses in Loudoun. Frederick Douglass PTA–Vice President.Supports teachers, parents and students through community outreach and fundraising. . Loudoun NAACP–Economic
Development Committee. Plan events to support Loudoun Businesses. 86 Item c. FUSION, focused on closing the achievement gap of academically at risk students. 87 Item c. Date of Council
Meeting: January 11, 2022 TOWN OF LEESBURG TOWN COUNCIL MEETING Subject: Appointment to the Tree Commission Staff Contact: Eileen M. Boeing, CMC, Clerk of Council Council Action Requested:
Consideration of an appointment of Joseph Garnreiter to the Tree Commission. Staff Recommendation: Not applicable. Commission Recommendation: Not applicable. Fiscal Impact: Section
2-197 of the Town Code provides for annual compensation of $1,350 for the Chair of the Tree Commission and $1,200 for Tree Commission members. Funds are available within the current
Fiscal Year 2022 general fund budget. Executive Summary: One vacancy currently exists on the Tree Commission with the removal of Thomas Adams. This appointment belongs to Council
Member Cummings. Background: The terms of office for Commissioners correspond to the term of the council member who appointed them. The appointment of Joseph Garnreiter is effective
through December 2024. Membership on the Tree Commission may consist of Town residents or Town business owners. Mr. Garnreiter is a Town resident. Proposed Legislation: RESOLUTION
Appointing Joseph Garnreiter to the Tree Commission Draft Motions: 1. I move to approve the proposed Resolution. 2. I move to deny the proposed Resolution. OR 3. I move an alternate
motion. Attachments: 1. Draft Resolution 2. Statement of Interest/Resume – Joseph Garnreiter Rev. 05/27/2021 88 Item d. PRESENTED: January 11, 2022 RESOLUTION NO. 2022- ADOPTED:
________________ A RESOLUTION : APPOINTING JOSEPH GARNREITER TO THE TREE COMMISSION WHEREAS, participation by public-spirited citizens on town boards, commissions and committees
is vital to the success of town government and the democratic process; and WHEREAS, boards, commissions and committees serve an indispensable role in providing recommendations concerning
town policy and programs; and WHEREAS, Council desires to appoint effective individuals to serve at its will and pleasure on these advisory boards; and WHEREAS, terms of Boards and
Commissions members correspond to the term of the Council Member that nominated them, and WHEREAS, membership on the Tree Commission shall consist of town residents or town business
owners. Mr. Garnreiter is a Town resident. THEREFORE, RESOLVED, that the Council of the Town of Leesburg in Virginia hereby appoints Joseph Garnreiter to the Tree Commission to
a term ending December 31, 2024. PASSED this 11th day of January, 2022. ______________________________ Kelly Burk, Mayor Town of Leesburg ATTEST: ______________________________
Clerk of Council 89 Item d. Joseph Garnreiter
306 Belmont Dr. SW
Leesburg, VA 20175
Hello,
My name is Joe Garnreiter and I’m writing to be considered for the open position on the Leesburg Tree Commission. As both a Leesburg resident and avid conservationist, I would be thrilled
for the opportunity to serve my community by helping preserve and replant native greenery.
I first moved to Leesburg in 2013 and quickly fell in love the town’s unique blend of outdoor spaces and public attractions. Since then, my wife and I have purchased our first home together
here in hopes to start our family and enjoy local offerings such as Ida Lee Park and the W&OD Trail with a new generation. Additionally, as an employee of the National Wildlife Federation,
I’m very familiar with the hard work required and wonderful satisfaction felt to see natural resources preserved. I would love the opportunity to carry my passion for environmental
sustainability home from the office and back to my community.
Lastly, with so much growth in the surrounding areas I feel it is more important than ever to funnel efforts into natural conservation and help the commission enhance, expand, and preserve
the tree canopy here in wonderful Leesburg.
Thank you,
Joe Garnreiter
304-270-0285
jgarnreiter@gmail.com
90 Item d. Joseph Garnreiter 306 Belmont Dr. SW • Leesburg, VA 20175 304-270-0285 • jgarnreiter@gmail.com Summary of Qualifications More than 8 years of experience in buying, merchandising,
and eCommerce management in the outdoor and non-profit sector. Sales driven, with a strong analytical and data-focused work ethic. Highly passionate about brand development and devoted
to customer service. Experience National Wildlife Association June 2019 – Present Buyer & eCommerce Manager Duties ▪ Create monthly email, banner, social, and promotional schedule
for ShopNWF, CardShopNWF, and ShopNWFpics ▪ Build, code and schedule all ShopNWF and Cardshopnwf emails o ~20 emails per month ▪ Manage the upload and maintenance of banners on ShopNWF
and CardshopNWF o ~40 homepage banners per month ▪ Work with TOG to align promotional code schedule with inventory levels and new product arrival ▪ Serve as liaison between site host
Virid, TOG, and NWF to facilitate site fixes and future functionality ▪ Build, manage, and populate site navigation and product collections ▪ Assist in merchandising live, out of stock,
and discontinued SKUs ▪ Tracking and resolve incidents on orders placed via PayPal ▪ Build, release, receive all PO’s through CloudSuite system ▪ Maintain site fraud and dept customer
filters National Rifle Association of America August 2013 – June 2019 Lead Merchandise Buyer Duties ▪ Develop and implement all official NRA, NRAstore, NRA event merchandise ▪ Analyze
sales and inventory to forecast purchasing plans ▪ Actively supervise reorder thresholds to optimize product inventory. Supervise purchase order delivery dates and vendor shipments
to eliminate backorders ▪ Formulate marketing plans and creative copy for all products ▪ Lead creative direction for product photography, as well as web and catalog presence ▪ Generate
and monitor success of promotions across all mediums, including bi-weekly email blasts, weekly blog posts, quarterly catalogs and at events ▪ Develop and maintain relationships with
a wide array of vendors and business alliances ▪ Closely monitor and anticipate industry and market trends ▪ Manage NRAstore customer relations 91 Item d. Food Lion, LLC 2007 – 2013
Customer Service and Product Associate Duties ▪ Assisted in daily product orders to achieve ideal balance of inventory and maximize sales ▪ Assisted customers in all service needs ▪
Ensured all product was maintained at the highest quality levels Reporter’s Network May 2009 – August 2009 Communications Intern Duties ▪ Assisted in phone and email communications
to clients Skills ▪ More than 18 years’ experience in customer service and retail settings ▪ Excellent written and verbal communication ▪ Exceptional team player and highly efficient
working independently ▪ Effective application of sales data and information to decision making process ▪ Product copywriting and editing ▪ Catalog and web product layout ▪ Tradeshow
and event organization ▪ Magento E-Commerce sales and inventory software ▪ Working knowledge of HTML and content management ▪ Microsoft and Mac operating systems ▪ Microsoft Word, PowerPoint,
Excel and Outlook ▪ Mobile and desktop communication applications ▪ Currently learning Spanish Education BS, Mass Communications - 2012 Shepherd University, Shepherdstown, WV Diploma
- 2007 Musselman High School, Bunker Hill, WV 92 Item d. Date of Council Meeting: January 11, 2022 TOWN OF LEESBURG TOWN COUNCIL MEETING Subject: Removing Ron Platt from the Tree
Commission Staff Contact: Eileen M. Boeing, CMC, Clerk of Council Council Action Requested: Removal of Tree Commissioner Ron Platt. Staff Recommendation: Not applicable. Commission
Recommendation: Tree Commission Chair Earl Hower concurs with removal of Tree Commissioner Ron Platt. Fiscal Impact: Mr. Platt is currently receiving a monthly stipend of $100.
Work Plan Impact: None. Executive Summary: Tree Commission Chair Earl Hower notified Council Member Steinberg on December 14, 2021, of an attendance issue with Tree Commissioner Ron
Platt who has missed six meetings in calendar year 2021. Attempts to contact Mr. Platt by Chair Hower and Council Member Steinberg have been unsuccessful. As a result, Council Member
Steinberg is requesting removal of Mr. Platt from the Tree Commission. This action will allow a replacement appointment to serve the remaining portion of Mr. Platt’s term which expires
on December 31, 2022. Background: In accordance with Town Code 2-195(b), the commission chair shall report any attendance problems to the Town Council which has the authority to require
a member to resign. Attendance problems include, but are not limited to, if the member is absent from three consecutive meetings, or is absent from any four meetings within any 12-month
period. Mr. Platt has missed six meetings in the calendar year 2021. Proposed Legislation: RESOLUTION Removing Ron Platt from the Tree Commission 93 Item e. Removing Ron Platt
from the Tree Commission January 11, 2022 Page 2 Draft Motions: 1. I move to approve the proposed Resolution. 2. I move to deny the proposed Resolution. OR 3. I move an alternate
motion. Attachments: 1. Draft Resolution 2. Email from Tree Commission Chair Earl Hower and Council Member Steinberg 3. Town Code Section 2-195 4. Board and Commission Attendance
Report – Calendar Year 2021 Rev. 05/27/2021 94 Item e. PRESENTED: January 11, 2022 RESOLUTION NO. 2022- ADOPTED: ______________ A RESOLUTION : REMOVING RON PLATT FROM THE TREE COMMISSION
WHEREAS, Leesburg Town Code 2-195 requires Advisory Boards and Commissions to meet monthly; and WHEREAS, the Tree Commission meets on the third Tuesday of each month at 7:00 p.m.
at Town Hall; and WHEREAS, Board and Commission members serve at the pleasure of Council. WHEREAS, the chair shall report any attendance problems to the Town Council which has the
authority to require a member to resign. Attendance problems include, but are not limited to, if the member is absent from three consecutive meetings, or is absent from any four meetings
within any 12-month period; and WHEREAS, Tree Commission Chair Earl Hower notified Council Member Neil Steinberg of Mr. Platt’s attendance issues which included missing six meetings
in calendar year 2021. WHEREAS, all attempts by Chair Hower and Council Member Steinberg to contact Mr. Platt have been unsuccessful; and WHEREAS, Council Member Steinberg requests
Mr. Platt’s removal from the Tree Commission as a result in order to appoint a new tree commissioner. THEREFORE, RESOLVED, by the Council of the Town of Leesburg in Virginia hereby
removes Ron Platt from the Tree Commission to be replaced by a new commission member selected by Council Member Steinberg within 60 days of the passage of this resolution. 95 Item
e. A RESOLUTION: REMOVING RON PLATT FROM THE TREE COMMISSION -2- 07/30/2021 PASSED this 11th day of January, 2022. ______________________________ Kelly Burk, Mayor Town
of Leesburg ATTEST: ______________________________ Clerk of Council 96 Item e. 1 Eileen Boeing From: Neil Steinberg Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2021 11:38 AM To: Earl Hower
Cc: Eileen Boeing Subject: Re: Ron Platt 's Status On Tree Commission Earl, Thanks for the information. I have made a concerted effort in trying to get Ron to send a letter of
resignation, but to no avail. The town clerk, Eileen Boeing will put in place the process for Council to proceed on a replacement for Mr. Platt. In the meantime I will look for a new
commissioner. Regards, Neil Neil Steinberg Councilman Leesburg Town Council 25 West Market Street Leesburg, VA 20176 From: Earl Hower <ehower1@leesburgva.gov> Sent: Tuesday, December
14, 2021 6:44 PM To: Neil Steinberg <NSteinberg@LEESBURGVA.GOV> Cc: Tyler Wright <TWright@LEESBURGVA.GOV>; Earl Hower <ehower1@leesburgva.gov> Subject: Ron Platt 's Status On Tree Commission
Dear Councilman Steinberg (Neil): I've been recently told ‐‐ about a month ago ‐‐ by Ron's wife that he has resigned from the Tree Commission for personal reasons. However, he has not sub
mitted any written notice to the Clerk of the Council. I've tried to call and then texted him requesting that he do so; but have not heard back from him. As his Councilmanic sponsor, could you
please reach out to him and remind him of this task. I do very much appreciate the assistance. Thank you in advance. Earl Hower, Chair Tree Commission 97 Item e. Created:
2021-06-15 10:03:53 [EST] (Supp. No. 20) Page 1 of 1 Sec. 2-195. Duties. (a) The board/commission shall elect its chair annually. The commission shall elect annually the officers it
deems necessary. Elections are encouraged to occur between January and March. (b) The chair shall report any attendance problems to the town council, which has the authority to require
a member to resign. Attendance problems include, but are not limited to, if the member is absent from three consecutive meetings, or is absent from any four meetings within any 12-month
period. (c) The board/commission shall meet monthly, and may meet as necessary upon the call of the chair or two or more members. Unless otherwise noted, failure to attend additional
meetings called by the chair or at least two members shall not count against the monthly requirement. (d) The board/commission shall provide at least annually a report to the town
council on the activities and accomplishments of the board/commission. (e) The board/commission shall adopt rules/bylaws governing the conduct of its business and meetings. (f) The
board/commission shall be knowledgeable of the requirements of the State Freedom of Information Act (Code of Virginia, § 2.2-3700 et seq.), State and Local Government Conflict of Interests
Act (Code of Virginia, § 2.2-3100 et seq.) requirements, and the town's board and commission handbook. (g) Unless otherwise noted, all actions of boards and commissions shall be subject
to town council approval. (h) The chair, or his designee, shall provide to the clerk of town council key events/actions from each meeting which shall be provided to town council in
a summary format monthly reporting on board and commission activities. (i) The board/commission shall assist in and carry out such other duties as may be assigned by the town council.
(Ord. No. 2008-0-17, § XXIV(art. VII(2.87)(c)), 6-24-2008; Ord. No. 2014-O-012 , 4-22-2014; Ord. No. 2018-O-007 , § I, 2-13-2018; Ord. No. 2019-O-013 , § I, 6-11-2019) 98 Item e.
Date: 1/4/2022 Page 1 of 2 Town of Leesburg Legend: Boards & Commisssions Attendance Present No Quorum Calendar Year 2021 E = Present via Electronic Participation E P = No Quorum but
Member was present P Absent Recused from Meeting No Meeting Emeritus Status Not on / No Longer on Commission R = Rescheduled R Airport Commission Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep
Oct Nov Dec Arrington, Lindsay Boykin, Dennis Miller, Sybille Duenkel, Daniel E E Forsythe, Hugh Toth, Tom E de Haan, Raymond E E Thomas Balch Library Commission Jan Feb Mar Apr May
Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Woolard, Russ E E E E E Hershman, James Pellicano, Mary Mattina, Adrian E E E Schonberger, Martha E E E E Kinne, Mandy E E E Paul Coyer Jewell, Tom Commission
on Public Art Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Ward, Jeanette E E E E E E Beijan, Minu E E E E E McCullough, Kareem E Torraca, Donna Garofalo, James Amy Manson Ransom,
Elizabeth E E Kreingold, Linda Kim, Kim P. E Diversity Commission Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Randolph, Mary P P McCray, Linda P P Maddox, Vanessa E E E E E Carter,
Devon E E E E E Poisson, Jean-Joseph E E E Kunzelman, Dana E E E E E E E E Martinez-Harris, Jasmin E E E P E P Economic Development Commission Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct
Nov Dec Youkers, Brittany E E E E E Byrd, Eric E E E E Edwards, Marantha E E E E E Neel, Britta E E E Allred, Curtis E E Choi, James E E E E E Miller, Jason E Williams, Patrick Boardman,
Andrew McCarter, Nick Arbogast, Kevin Environmental Advisory Commission Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jones, Martha E E E Brafford, Kohler Bolthouse, Julie E E Sheafer,
Paul Mason, Ami Replogle, Bill Faugust, Leigh Anne Chu, Jennifer Bergheim, Maria E E Kelemen, Gabe Parks & Recreation Commission Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Cimino-Johnson,
Todd E E Fulcer, Rob E McCray, Brody E E Shabanowitz, Kirsten E Drupa, David E E Hart, Rachel E E Burke, Laurie E E 99 Item e. Date: 1/4/2022 Page 2 of 2 Residential Traffic Committee
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Grossman, Sandy E Caney, Brian C. E Jones, Raymond Sproul, Robert J. E Phillips, Jeff E Vella, Michael Patel, Deepan E Burnham, John
E Sisson, Julie Technology and Communications Commission Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Hill, Peter E E Binkley, John E Nadler, Aaron E E Johnson, Katherine E E P Curtis,
John (Jack) E Jackson, Richard E Ahmed, Daoud Cheema, Ahmad E P Kolas, Mark Tree Commission Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Welch, Elizabeth P P Groothuis, John P P
Marshall, Philip Adams, Thomas E E Hatfield, Pat E E Hower, Earl P P Platt, Ron E Board of Architectural Review Jan Feb Feb Mar Mar Apr Apr MayMay Jun Jun Jul Jul Aug Aug Sep Sep Oct
Oct Nov Nov Dec Dec Minchew, Teresa Reimers, Paul Aikman, Helen E E Nicholson, Erin E O'Neil, Tom Pastor, Julie Scheuerman, Donald Goodson, Dale Koochagian, Richard Skinner, Stacy Planning
Commission Jan Jan Feb Feb Mar Mar Apr Apr MayMay Jun Jun Jul Jul Aug Aug Sep Sep Oct Oct Nov Nov Dec Dec Barnes, Ad Robinson, Gigi Hoovler, Earl C. McAfee, Brian L. Reeve, Keith Barney,
Al Clemente, Nicholas E Lanham, Rick Miles, David Board of Zoning Appeals Jan Feb Mar Apr MayJun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Carter, Joseph Moffett, Susan Semmes, Martha Mason Gutierrez,
Gregory Vanderloo, Peter L. 100 Item e. PROCLAMATION Tuscarora Mill Restaurant Celebrates 36th Business Anniversary WHEREAS, on December 22, 1985, Kevin Malone opened the Tuscarora
Mill Restaurant better known to locals as “Tuskies”; and WHEREAS, Tuskies has consistently been recognized by the community as an outstanding Leesburg restaurant that always provides
an exceptional fine dining experience, whether as place to go to celebrate a special occasion, refresh and recharge while on travel, or a place to meet colleagues over a business lunch
or dinner; and WHEREAS, part of Tuskies success is not only the delicious food and high quality wine, but its attractive and innovative setting within a 19th century grain mill in
downtown Leesburg at Market Station; and WHEREAS, the Town of Leesburg thanks Tuscarora Mill Restaurant and Founder Kevin Malone for the legacy role it continues to play in contributing
to our local small business culture. THEREFORE, PROCLAIMED, that the Mayor and Council of the Town of Leesburg in Virginia, congratulates the Tuscarora Mill Restaurant on its 36th
business anniversary. PROCLAIMED this 18th day of January, 2022. 101 Item f. Date of Council Meeting: January 10, 2022 TOWN OF LEESBURG TOWN COUNCIL WORK SESSION Subject:
Procurement Policy Revisions Staff Contact: Octavia Andrew, Chief Procurement Officer Clark Case, Director of Finance and Administrative Services Council Action Requested: Adopt the
proposed resolution updating the Town procurement policy related to procurement methods including electronic bidding, prequalification for construction, design-build and construction
management contracting, purchase thresholds/limits, and authorization authority levels as authorized by Virginia Public Procurement Act. Staff Recommendation: Authorize and adopt
via resolution changes to the Town Procurement Policy to streamline existing procurement methods, and authorize the use of additional procurement methods in accordance with the applicable
sections of Virginia Public Procurement Act (VPPA). The proposed changes include electronic bidding, prequalification for construction (§ 2.2-4317), design-build and construction management
contracting (§ 2.2-4382), increased small purchase thresholds as authorized by the VPPA (§2.2-4303(G)(1)), and Town specific authorization authority levels. Commission Recommendation:
Not applicable. Fiscal Impact: No direct, quantifiable fiscal impact. However, it is anticipated that the proposed changes to the Town Procurement Policy will produce savings over
time through increased efficiency, timeliness, and vendor competition. Work Plan Impact: The proposed increase in approval thresholds will streamline the acquisition of the heavy volume
of goods and services needed by General and Utility Fund departments in their service delivery. The use of electronic bidding and the approval of additional procurement methods, including
prequalification for construction, and design-build and construction management contracting will potentially increase competition in response to Town requests for bids and proposals,
ultimately resulting in improved acquisition of services. Executive Summary: The Town’s maximum small purchase thresholds are set by the Virginia Public Procurement Act (VPPA). The
small purchase thresholds under the Town’s current procurement policy are below those permitted by the VPPA. As the requirements within the Town’s Capital Improvement Program, Utilities
Repair, Replacement and Rehabilitation (3R), and other operating departments needs increase, the need to align the Town’s thresholds with the VPPA is critical for efficiency of operations
and reduction of procurement lead times. 102 Item g. Procurement Policy Revisions January 10, 2022 Page 2 A summary of the proposed limits is below: Current Purchase Amounts Current
Authorization Proposed Purchase Amounts Proposed Authorization $0 – $29,999 Department Director, Procurement Office $0 – $29,999 Department Director, Procurement Office $30,000 - $49,999
Department Director, Procurement Office, Director of Finance and Administrative Services, and Town Manager $30,000 - $49,999 Department Director, Procurement Office, Director of Finance
and Administrative Services $50,000 - $99,999 Department Director, Procurement Office, Director of Finance and Administrative Services, and Town Manager $50,000 - $199,999 Department
Director, Procurement Office, Director of Finance and Administrative Services, and Town Manager $100,000+ Town Council $200,000+ Town Council The use of electronic bidding and the approval
of additional types of procurement methods, including prequalification for construction, and design-build and construction management contracting may result in more competitive responses
to Town requests for bids and proposals, and could potentially lower acquisition costs. All proposed changes are detailed in the proposed procurement policy. See Attachment # 2. Background:
Town Council originally adopted the Virginia Public Procurement Act (VPPA) and the Leesburg Purchasing Policy Manual as the Town Procurement Policy in August 2000. Town Council readopted
the Policy and delegated authority to the Town Manager to administer and implement the Policy in June 2012. Minor administrative changes have been made to the Policy since 2012; however,
it is in the best interest of the Town to amend the Policy and authorize additional procurement methods permitted by the VPPA. Proposed changes to the purchase thresholds and additional
procurement methods in the Town Procurement Policy will increase efficiency of procuring goods and services and reduce the lead time on many procurements. Purchases in the amount of
$200,000 or more will continue to require Council approval. The proposed additional methods of procurement will further increase competition, favorable pricing, and may result in overall
efficiencies of Town operations. Three additional construction procurement methods are proposed in the policy document: prequalification for construction; design-build contracting,
and construction management contracting. These methods may not be utilized by a locality unless procedures for their use are adopted by the governing body in accordance with the VPPA.
For certain projects, these methods can potentially yield efficiencies and attendant cost savings in either the procurement process or in the construction process itself. 103 Item
g. Procurement Policy Revisions January 10, 2022 Page 3 A prequalification procedure established in accordance with VPPA § 2.2-4317 allows for a shortened purchase cycle for construction
contracts, as solicitations are only sent to those contractors determined to meet minimum quality or performance standards established in advance by the Town (that is, those who are
“prequalified”). Prequalification is performed sufficiently in advance of the anticipated procurement to allow the Town time for evaluation and qualification of potential contractors
and/or products. For towns, both design-build and construction management contracts are governed by Virginia Code § 2.2-4382. Design-build contracts include all work required for both
the design and the construction of a project. Construction management contracts allow complex projects to be coordinated by a single contractor, who may also perform a limited portion
of the services. Section 2.2-4382 allows local public bodies to enter into these types of contracts only if they comply with the requirements of § 2.2-4382, and adopt procedures consistent
with those adopted by the Commonwealth Secretary of Administration. In order to meet the requirements of § 2.2-4382 and provide the flexibility to revise these procedures as necessary
to remain consistent with updates by the Secretary of Administration, staff has proposed that the required procedures be contained in a separate document to be incorporated into the
Procurement Policy and Procedures Manual as an appendix. As the proposed procedures note, the Town will make use of these contracting methods only when they provide an advantage over
standard competitive sealed bidding, and will utilize professional engineering services to assist in preparing the Town’s solicitation documents and evaluating responses. Several revisions
are proposed to streamline the procurement process, including electronic bidding and revised small purchase thresholds and internal authorization limits. Authorizing changes to the
purchase thresholds will increase efficiency for the operating departments in procuring goods and services. Purchases in amounts of $200,000 or more will continue to require Council
approval. The use of electronic bidding through the Commonwealth of Virginia’s free electronic platform for procurement (eVA) and may result in an increase in the number of competitive
responses to Town requests for bids and proposals, and could potentially lower acquisition costs. Proposed Legislation: RESOLUTION Adopting Procurement Policy and Design-Build
and Construction Management Procedures Draft Motions: 1. I move to approve the proposed Resolution. 2. I move to deny the proposed Resolution. OR 104 Item g. Procurement Policy Revisions
January 10, 2022 Page 4 3. I move an alternate motion. Attachments: 1. Draft Resolution 2. Proposed Procurement Policy 3. Appendix A-1 Design-Build and Construction Management Procedures
Rev. 05/27/2021 105 Item g. PRESENTED: January 11, 2022 RESOLUTION NO. 2022- ADOPTED: _______________ A RESOLUTION : ADOPTING PROCUREMENT POLICY AND DESIGN-BUILD AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
PROCEDURES WHEREAS, the Town Council originally adopted the Virginia Public Procurement Act (VPPA) and the Leesburg Purchasing Policy Manual as the Town’s Procurement Policy in August
2000; and WHEREAS, Town Council readopted the VPPA and the Town of Leesburg Procurement Policy and delegated to the Town Manager the authority to implement the policy in June 2012;
and WHEREAS, the VPPA authorizes the Town to develop and adopt administrative policies and procedures for the purpose of clearly defining procurement processes for the Town; and WHEREAS,
it is in the best interest of the Town to update and revise its procurement policy to: clarify and increase the efficiency of the Town procurement process, and to authorize the Town
to utilize additional procurement methods permitted by the VPPA where such methods would be advantageous to the Town; and WHEREAS, § 2.2-4303(G)(1) permits Towns to establish written
procedures governing small purchases without competitive bidding or negotiation, under the maximum small purchase dollar thresholds established in the VPPA; and WHEREAS, the Town’s
small purchase thresholds under the existing procurement policy are below the maximum dollar limits set by the VPPA; and 106 Item g. A RESOLUTION: ADOPTING PROCUREMENT POLICY AND
DESIGN-BUILD AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES -2- WHEREAS, increasing the Town’s small purchase thresholds to the maximum thresholds permitted by the VPPA would improve efficiency
and assist the Town in procuring the volume of goods and services needed for the Capital Improvements Program and Departmental operations; and WHEREAS, under the proposed procurement
policy Town Council approval is required for all contracts with a total contract amount of $200,000 or more, and for all unbudgeted contracts regardless of the contract amount; and
WHEREAS, § 2.2-4302 of the VPPA authorizes a public body to act by and through its duly designated or authorized officers and employees; and WHEREAS, the proposed procurement policy
sets forth the authority of the Town Manager and the Chief Procurement Officer to execute agreements, contracts and task orders on behalf of the Town; and WHEREAS, utilization of
electronic bidding through the State of Virginia’s free electronic platform for procurement (eVA) will increase efficiency and may increase competition in response to Town procurement
solicitations; and WHEREAS, the Town seeks to fully leverage competition for the acquisition of goods and services; and WHEREAS, additional procurement methods, including prequalification
for construction in accordance with VPPA § 2.2-4317, and design-build and construction management contracting in accordance with VPPA § 2.2-4382, will provide flexibility to Town departments
in their delivery of services to residents and businesses; and 107 Item g. A RESOLUTION: ADOPTING PROCUREMENT POLICY AND DESIGN-BUILD AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES -3-
WHEREAS, the proposed procurement policy authorizes the use of a prequalification process for construction contracts; and WHEREAS, § 2.2-4382 of the Code of Virginia (as amended)
requires that a public body using the design-build or construction management method of contracting shall have adopted by ordinance or resolution written procedures governing the selection,
evaluation, and award of design-build and construction management contracts prior to issuing a solicitation for any such contract; and WHEREAS, the proposed Appendix A-1, to be incorporated
into the Town’s Procurement Policy and Procedures Manual, establishes procedures consistent with the requirements of § 2.2-4382 for the use of design-build and construction management
contracting; and WHEREAS, the proposed Town of Leesburg Procurement Policy and Procedures Manual dated January 11, 2022, is consistent with the VPPA and is in the best interests of
the Town. THEREFORE, RESOLVED, by the Council of the Town of Leesburg in Virginia as follows: 1. The provisions of the Virginia Public Procurement Act (Virginia Code §§ 2.2-4300
et seq.) are hereby readopted as the procurement policy of the Town of Leesburg. 2. The Town of Leesburg Procurement Policy and Procedures Manual dated January 11, 2022, is hereby
adopted and shall be effective as of this date. 3. Appendix A-1 (Design-Build Procedures and Construction Management Procedures) is hereby adopted effective as of this date, and shall
be incorporated into and form a part of the Town of Leesburg Procurement Policy and Procedures Manual dated January 11, 2022, but may be amended from time to time by separate resolution,
108 Item g. A RESOLUTION: ADOPTING PROCUREMENT POLICY AND DESIGN-BUILD AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES -4- 07/30/2021 independent of or together with amendments to the
Procurement Policy and Procedures Manual. 4. The authority is hereby delegated to the Town Manager to develop, approve, and keep current administrative procurement procedures consistent
with the Virginia Public Procurement Act and the Procurement Policy and Procedures Manual hereby adopted, including but not limited to all procedures to be set forth in Appendix A of
the Procurement Policy and Procedures Manual. PASSED this 11th day of January, 2022. ______________________________ Kelly Burk, Mayor Town of Leesburg ATTEST: _______________________
_______ Clerk of Council 109 Item g. PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL TOWN OF LEESBURG, VIRGINIA 25 W. MARKET STREET LEEESBURG, VIRGINIA 20176 ADOPTED: JANUARY
11, 2022 REVISED: JANUARY 11, 2022 110 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG, VA – PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Revised: January 11, 2022 Page 2 of 60 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION
1 GENERAL PROVISIONS ............................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Purpose ...................................................
...................................................................................... 4 1.2 Authority ................................................................................................
....................................... 4 1.3 Procurement Mission Statement .................................................................................................. 5 1.4 Public
Notice of Procurement Opportunities ............................................................................... 5 1.5 Electronic Bidding .........................................................
................................................................ 5 1.6 Procurement Procedures Manual .................................................................................................
6 SECTION 2 PROCUREMENT POLICIES ........................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Conflict of Interest and Ethics in
Public Procurement ................................................................. 7 2.2 Contract Execution Policy ................................................................................
............................. 9 2.3 Grant Administration Policy ........................................................................................................ 12 2.4 Inclement
Weather or Closed Office Policy ................................................................................ 12 2.5 Public-Private Education Facilities and Infrastructure Act and
Public-Private Transportation Act Policy 12 2.6 Purchase Order Requisitions ...................................................................................................... 12
2.7 Purchase Order Policy ................................................................................................................. 13 2.8 Small Purchase Policy .............................
..................................................................................... 14 SECTION 3 METHODS OF PROCUREMENT .............................................................................
............ 15 3.1 Cooperative Procurement........................................................................................................... 15 3.2 Informal Solicitations Under
Small Purchase Policy ................................................................... 16 3.3 Invitation for Bid (IFB) or Competitive Sealed Bidding ..............................................
................. 18 3.4 Construction Management and Design-Build Contracting ........................................................ 22 3.5 Job Order Contracting (JOC) ............................
........................................................................... 23 3.6 Request for Information (RFI) ......................................................................................
............... 24 3.7 Pre-Qualification for Construction ............................................................................................. 24 3.8 Request for Proposal (RFP)
......................................................................................................... 27 SECTION 4 PURCHASE CARD POLICY ..........................................................
....................................... 32 4.1 Purpose .......................................................................................................................................
32 4.2 Authority ..................................................................................................................................... 32 4.3 Policy Guidelines ......................
................................................................................................... 33 SECTION 5 BID PROTESTS, DEBARMENT, AND OTHER APPEALS ...........................................
............... 36 5.1 Bid Protests ................................................................................................................................. 36 5.2 Debarment
.................................................................................................................................. 36 111 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG, VA – PROCUREMENT
POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Revised: January 11, 2022 Page 3 of 60 5.3 Petition for Recycled Goods and Products ................................................................................
. 37 5.4 Petition for Less Toxic Goods and Products ................................................................................ 37 SECTION 6 CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION .............................
............................................................. 38 6.1 Authority ........................................................................................................................
............. 38 6.2 Change Orders and Contract Modifications ............................................................................... 38 6.3 Contract Renewals and Extensions
............................................................................................. 39 6.4 Distributing Projects for Multiple Award Architectural or Engineering Contracts
..................... 39 6.5 Contract Task Orders .................................................................................................................. 40 6.6 Prompt Pay
Act for Localities ...................................................................................................... 40 SECTION 7 SMALL, WOMAN, AND MINORITY OWNED BUSINESS PROGRAM
...................................... 41 SECTION 8 SURPLUS PROPERTY POLICY ............................................................................................. 42 SECTION
9 VENDOR MANUAL AND DOING BUSINESS WITH THE TOWN ............................................. 43 SECTION 10 PROCUREMENT VIOLATION POLICY ............................................................
.................... 44 10.1 Definitions ................................................................................................................................... 44 10.2 Policy
........................................................................................................................................... 44 10.3 Violation Examples ...............................
....................................................................................... 45 10.4 Ratification of Violations ............................................................................
................................. 46 10.5 Escalation for Violations ............................................................................................................. 47 10.6
Fraud and Severe Violations ....................................................................................................... 47 SECTION 11 DEFINITIONS ........................................
......................................................................... 48 APPENDIX A PROCUREMENT PROCEDURES MANUAL ........................................................................
58 APPENDIX B SOLICITATION TEMPLATES ............................................................................................ 59 APPENDIX C PROCUREMENT CHARTS, CHECKLISTS, AND FORMS
....................................................... 60 112 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG, VA – PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Revised: January 11, 2022 Page 4 of 60
SECTION 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS 1.1 Purpose The Town has adopted the provisions of the Virginia Public Procurement Act (“VPPA”), and the policies and procedures herein were developed
pursuant to , Sections 2.2-4300 through 2.2-4383 of the VPPA and are intended to provide the framework to maintain a strong public confidence in the integrity of public procurement,
promote competition, and obtain the most favorable price for the purchase of needed goods and services by the Town. 1.2 Authority Section 2.2-4302 of the VPPA allows public bodies
to act through their duly designated or authorized officers or employees to develop and adopt certain administrative policies and procedures for the purpose of clearly defining the
procurement processes for the locality. All appointed with authority within the procurement process have the combined responsibility of promoting the best interests of the Town of Leesburg,
while maintaining fair and open competition. Town Council is the governing body of the Town of Leesburg, Virginia. Town Manager or designee(s) shall exercise overall responsibility
for the conduct of the Town’s procurement process through the Director of Finance and Administrative Services and makes administrative changes to the Procurement Policies and Procedures
Manual. Only the Town Manager or designee(s) is authorized to execute contracts which bind the Town for the purchase of goods, services, insurance, or construction. Director of Finance
and Administrative Services or designee(s) shall direct and have the general supervision of the Procurement Office. The Director of Finance and Administrative Services or designee(s)
shall certify that the estimated amount of money or funding required to purchase the goods, services, insurance or construction necessary by the Town has been lawfully budgeted and
appropriated. Chief Procurement Officer or designee(s) shall serve as the purchasing agent for the Town with the authority and responsibility to manage, observe, and enforce the policies
and procedures adopted herein, along with concurrence of the Town Manager. The Chief Procurement Officer or designee(s) shall ensure that all procurement transactions are conducted
in a fair and impartial manner; ensure that competition is sought to the maximum feasible degree and in the best interests of the Town; serve as the designed official for all procurement
protest activities under the Code of Virginia Section 2.24360; and ensure that appropriate Town personnel are trained and have access to the Town’s Procurement Policies and Procedures
Manual. 113 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG, VA – PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Revised: January 11, 2022 Page 5 of 60 Department Director or designee(s) shall exercise the
authority and responsibility to ensure compliance by the personnel of their department with the procurement policies and procedures herein; ensure that procurements are made for authorized
official Town business and within the budgetary limits approved by Town Council; ensure that all goods, services, or construction purchased are properly inspected, accepted, and conform
to the purchase order specifications and terms and conditions; enforce delegated procurement responsibility within the limits of the policies and procedures established herein; and
ensure that the appropriate personnel of their department attend procurement training and have read and understood to the Town’s Procurement Policies and Procedures Manual. 1.3 Procurement
Mission Statement The Procurement Office is committed to achieving cost-effective and economical acquisition of goods, services, insurance, and construction necessary by the Town while
ensuring that contract awards are made in a fair and equitable manner with the avoidance of impropriety or appearance of impropriety. As stewards to the taxpayers of the Town of Leesburg,
the Procurement Office is charged with the duty to provide value added services, through innovation and the use of technology, to achieve greater efficiency, transparency, and other
cost savings in the Town’s procurement process. In all procurement transactions, the Procurement Office seeks to preserve the highest standards of accountability, efficiency, ethics,
impartiality, transparency, and professionalism. 1.4 Public Notice of Procurement Opportunities Notices of contracting opportunities are posted on the Town’s Bid Board (https://www.leesburgva.gov/
departments/finance/procurement/bid-board), on the Commonwealth of Virginia’s electronic procurement website (https://eva.virginia.gov/), and on the Procurement Notice Board in a designated
public area located at 25 W. Market Street, Leesburg, VA 20176. In addition, public notices may be published in a newspaper of general circulation or other appropriate websites. 1.5
Electronic Bidding To take advantage of efficiencies afforded by new technologies, with the approval of the Town Manager and the Town Attorney, the Procurement Office may establish
from time to time procedures for conducting procurement transactions to permit: (1) any solicitation to be issued; (2) any bid, offer, or quote to be submitted; or (3) any procurement
process authorized in this Procurement Policy to be accomplished, using electronic or other technological means, provided that such means are permitted by the VPPA and other law or
regulation applicable to the procurement process at the time such procedures are adopted, and provide sufficient security, reliability, identification 114 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG,
VA – PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Revised: January 11, 2022 Page 6 of 60 and verifiability. Notice of all such procedures shall be posted in accordance with Section
1.4 for a reasonable period in advance of their effective date. 1.6 Procurement Procedures Manual Town of Leesburg employees can access additional policy guidance, detailed processes,
authorized solicitation templates, charts, checklists, and forms on the Town’s Employee Portal: https://employee.leesburgva.gov/DEPARTMENTS/Finance/Procurement. 115 Item g. TOWN
OF LEESBURG, VA – PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Revised: January 11, 2022 Page 7 of 60 SECTION 2 PROCUREMENT POLICIES All public contracts with nongovernmental contractors
for the purchase or lease of goods, services, insurance or construction, shall be awarded after competitive sealed bidding or competitive negotiation pursuant to the VPPA and approved
optional policies contained herein, unless otherwise authorized or exempted by law or regulation. These policies and procedures apply to all procurements whether the consideration
is monetary or nonmonetary and regardless of whether the Town, the contractor, or some third party is providing the consideration, except those specifically exempted in the VPPA or
herein. Nothing contained in this policies and procedures manual shall prevent the Town from complying with the terms and conditions of any state or federal funding regulations, grant,
gift, or bequest. 2.1 Conflict of Interest and Ethics in Public Procurement It is the policy of the Town of Leesburg to preserve the integrity of the public procurement process by
ensuring public confidence that contracts are awarded in a fair and equitable manner. Pursuant to the Article 6 of the VPPA (§2.2-4367), and the State and Local Government Conflict
of Interest Act (§2.2-3100 et seq.), all Town employees having the official responsibility for a procurement transaction shall comply with this section. These provisions supplement
applicable criminal law, including the Virginia Government Frauds Act (§18.2-498.1 et seq.) and Articles 2 (Bribery and Related Offenses, §18.2-438 et seq.) and 3 (Bribery of Public
Servants and Party Officials, §18.2446 et seq.) of Chapter 10 of Title 18.2. 1. Procurement Transactions Unless otherwise allowed under the State and Local Government Conflict of
Interest Act §2.2-3112(B), no Town employee shall participate in a transaction on behalf of the Town when: a. The employee is contemporaneously employed by a bidder, offeror, or contractor
involved in the procurement transaction; b. The employee, the employee’s partner, or any member of the employee’s immediate family holds a position with a bidder, offeror or contractor
such as an officer, director, trustee, partner or the like, or is employed in a capacity involving personal and substantial participation in the procurement transaction, or owns or
controls an interest of more than five percent; c. The employee, the employee’s partner, or any member of the employee’s immediate family has a pecuniary interest arising from the
procurement transaction; 116 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG, VA – PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Revised: January 11, 2022 Page 8 of 60 d. The employee, the employee’s partner,
or any member of the employee’s immediate family is negotiating or has an arrangement concerning prospective employment with a bidder, offeror or contractor. 2. Solicitation or Acceptance
of Gifts No Town employee having official responsibility for a procurement transaction shall solicit, demand, accept, or agree to accept from a bidder, offeror, contractor or subcontractor
any payment, loan, subscription, advance, deposit of money, services or anything of more than nominal value, present or promised, unless consideration of substantially equal or greater
value is exchanged. 3. Kickbacks Contractors, subcontractors, and interested persons participating in a procurement transaction on behalf of the Town shall conduct themselves in
accordance with the following requirements: a. No contractor or subcontractor shall demand or receive from any of his suppliers or his subcontractors, as an inducement for the award
of a subcontractor or order, any payment, loan, subscription, advance, deposit of money, services or anything present or promised, unless consideration of substantially equal or greater
value is exchanged. b. No subcontractor or supplier shall make, or offer to make, kickbacks as described in this section. c. No person shall demand or receive any payment, loan,
subscription, advance, deposit of money, services or anything of value in return for an agreement not to compete on a Town contract. d. If a subcontractor or supplier makes a kickback
or other prohibited payment as described in this section, the amount thereof shall be conclusively presumed to have been included in the price of the subcontract or order and ultimately
borne by the public body and will be recoverable from both the maker and the recipient. Recovery from one offending party shall not preclude recovery from offending other parties.
4. Solicitation Preparation & Evaluation 117 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG, VA – PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Revised: January 11, 2022 Page 9 of 60 No person who, for
compensation, prepares a solicitation for or on behalf of the Town shall submit a bid or proposal for that procurement or any portion thereof or shall disclose to any bidder or offeror
information concerning the procurement which is not available to the public. The Town may permit such person to submit a bid or proposal for that procurement or any portion thereof
if the Town determines that the exclusion of such person would limit the number of potential qualified bidders or offerors in a manner contrary to the best interests of the Town.
Town employees having official responsibility for a procurement transaction shall not share bid or proposal information with any interested parties of the public prior to the award
for the contract and/or purchase order. 5. Certification of Compliance The Town may require Town employees having official responsibility for procurement transactions in which they
have participated to annually submit for such transactions a written certification that they have complied with the provisions of Section 2.1. Employees already required to submit Conflict
of Interest forms to the Town Clerk on an annual basis will not be required to make a separate certification under this Section 2.1. Any Town employee who knowingly makes a false statement
in such certification may be subject to penalties set forth in VPPA §2.2-4377, including criminal fines or penalties and forfeiture of employment. 6. Violations for Penalties The
penalties for violations of any of the provisions of this Policy are provided in the Section 10 of this Policy and VPPA §2.2-4377. 2.2 Contract Execution Policy The Procurement Office,
a division within the Department of Finance and Administrative Services, is responsible for administering the Town’s public procurement process in accordance with the policies and procedures
established herein. Town Council is the governing body of the Town of Leesburg, Virginia. Town Council approval is required for all contracts with a total contract amount of $200,000
or more. The aggregate or sum of all phases for single or term contracts shall be included in the total value. Town Council approval is required for all unbudgeted contracts regardless
of the contract amount. Except as otherwise authorized in the policies and procedures established herein, no contract in excess of $200,000 shall be effective unless approved by Town
Council, specifically delegated to the Town Manager by Town Council resolution, or otherwise preapproved or evergreen renewing by Town Council resolution. 118 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG,
VA – PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Revised: January 11, 2022 Page 10 of 60 Town Manager or designee(s) is authorized to execute contracts which bind the Town for the
purchase of goods, services, insurance or construction. The Town Manager or designee(s) shall have the authority to award, execute, and amend contracts where the total contract amount
is $200,000 or less. The Town Manager is authorized to execute contracts in a form approved by the Town Attorney resulting from procurements totaling over $200,000 after Town Council
award approval is obtained via resolution. The aggregate or sum of all phases for single or term contracts shall be included in the total value. The Town Manager or designee(s) shall
have the authority to terminate any contract for convenience, cause, or for non-appropriation of funds in accordance with the contract terms and after advisement from the Town Attorney.
Chief Procurement Officer or designee(s) is the designated purchasing agent and is authorized to execute contracts which bind the Town for the purchase of goods, services, insurance
or construction. The Chief Procurement Officer or designee(s) is authorized within authority delegated by the Town Manager to execute contracts in a form approved by the Town Attorney
resulting from procurements totaling $30,000 or less. The aggregate or sum of all phases for single or term contracts shall be included in the total value. The Chief Procurement Officer
or designee(s) shall have the authority to award, execute, and amend contracts resulting from procurements totaling up to $30,000. The Chief Procurement Officer or designee(s) shall
have the authority to terminate any contract within the Chief Procurement Officer’s execution authority, for convenience, cause, or for non-appropriation of funds in accordance with
the contract terms and after advisement from the Town Attorney. Director of Finance and Administrative Services or designee(s) by authorizing requisitions and subsequent purchase orders
shall certify that the estimated amount of money or funding required to purchase the goods, services, insurance or construction necessary by the Town has been lawfully budgeted and
appropriated for all contracts. All procurement requisitions that pass the budget availability check at the two-digit level of object (e.g. 52xxxx) are within the approved budget appropriation
and do not require additional approval. Procurements that would cause the actual cost to be over budget at the two-digit level of account, must either have budget transferred from
another budget with approval of the Budget Officer and the Town Manager (or designee) or have additional funding appropriated by Town Council. Department Director or designee(s) is
not authorized to execute contracts or task orders which bind the Town for the purchase of goods, services, insurance or construction unless a written exception and delegation is given
by the Town Manager during an official declared emergency. Department Director or designee(s) is authorized to execute change orders to existing contracts, within the authorized contractual
limits and change order dollar amounts. 119 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG, VA – PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Revised: January 11, 2022 Page 11 of 60 Town Attorney or designee(s)
shall approve as to form all contracts executed on behalf of the Town of Leesburg, except as follows: the Chief Procurement Officer or designee(s) may execute low-risk contracts under
the Town’s single quote threshold of $5,000, provided that such contracts do not contain terms that are ambiguous, unclear, or novel, and that the terms of such contracts are consistent
with the Town’s general terms and conditions as related to the such contract clauses as the Town Attorney or designee(s) may identify from time to time, including but not limited to:
governing law and court jurisdiction, indemnification, limitation of liability, waiver, and alternative dispute resolution. 120 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG, VA – PROCUREMENT POLICIES
AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Revised: January 11, 2022 Page 12 of 60 2.3 Grant Administration Policy It is the policy of the Town of Leesburg to administer and expend grant funds in accordance
with the Town of Leesburg’s Grant Administration Policies and Procedures adopted May 15, 2018. Grant procurements must be compliant with this policy to the extent that this policy does
not contradict any state or federal grant regulatory provisions or any particular provision of the grant agreement. A copy of the Town’s Grant Administration Policies and Procedures
can be found on the Town’s Accounting Website: https://www.leesburgva.gov/government/departments/finance/accounting. 2.4 Inclement Weather or Closed Office Policy It is the policy
of the Town of Leesburg to administer the public procurement process in a fair and equitable manner. Should the Town of Leesburg close offices due to inclement weather or other unforeseen
event or emergency on a date that bids and/or proposals are due, those bids and/or proposals will be due on the next "full" (8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.) business day at the same time specified
in the solicitation. 2.5 Public-Private Education Facilities and Infrastructure Act and Public-Private Transportation Act Policy It is the policy of the Town of Leesburg to administer
the process and selection of projects subject to the Public-Private Education Facilities and Infrastructure Act of 2002 (Va. Code §§ 56-575.1, et seq.) ("PPEA") and the Public-Private
Transportation Act of 1995 (Va. Code §§ 56-556, et seq.) ("PPTA"), in accordance with the Town’s PPEA and PPTA Combined Guidelines, which can be found on the Town’s Procurement Website:
https://www.leesburgva.gov/departments/finance/procurement. 2.6 Purchase Order Requisitions A purchase order (PO) requisition is generated in the Town financial system and serves
as the tool in which departments inform the Procurement Office of its procurement needs. A PO requisition pre-encumbers the required funds, identifies the funding source, and certifies
that sufficient funds are available. PO requisitions shall include all pertinent purchasing documentation and be reviewed and approved by authorized Town staff and the Department Director
or designee(s). The following approval authority shall be followed for all PO requisitions: 1. Purchases less than $5,000 must be authorized by a Department Director or designee(s)
and one (1) Procurement Official (Buyer or Senior Buyer or Chief Procurement Officer). It is recommended that a purchase card be used to the extent possible for these purchases.
121 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG, VA – PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Revised: January 11, 2022 Page 13 of 60 2. Purchases greater than or equal to $5,000 and less than $30,000
must be authorized by a Department Director or designee(s) and a Procurement Official (Buyer or Senior Buyer or Chief Procurement Officer). 3. Purchases greater than or equal to $30,000
and less than $50,000 must be authorized by the Department Director or designee(s), a Procurement Official (Buyer or Senior Buyer or the Chief Procurement Officer), and the Director
of Finance and Administrative Services or designee(s). 4. Purchases greater than $50,000 must authorized by the Department Director or designee(s), a Procurement Official (Buyer or
Senior Buyer or the Chief Procurement Officer), the Director of Finance and Administrative Services or designee(s), and the Town Manager or designee(s). For purchases greater than $200,000,
a Council resolution authorizing the award of the purchase shall be included with the purchasing documentation attached to the requisition. 2.7 Purchase Order Policy Unless otherwise
permitted by law, every expenditure of Town funds shall be in writing, in the form of a purchase order or contract, unless it falls within the Purchase Card Policy limits and guidelines
or is processed as an operational invoice under established payment procedures or under regulatory authority (e.g. VRS contributions, health insurance payments, payments to Loudoun
County or other unit under an MOA, payments under trust arrangements, utility or tax refunds, tax payments, etc.). A purchase order is a legally binding contract, issued by the Procurement
Office, which authorizes the vendor/contractor to ship goods or render services as specified. A purchase order must be issued by the Procurement Office BEFORE goods are ordered or services
are rendered. The Town’s Purchase Order Terms and Conditions, included as Appendix C to this Policy, shall be used by all Town employees who have the responsibility for a procurement
transaction. Unless agreed to otherwise in writing, all vendors who wish to do business with the Town must adhere to the Purchase Order Terms and Conditions. Because vendor acknowledgement
forms may contain terms and conditions that differ from those in the purchase order, may supersede the Purchase Order Terms and Conditions, and may not be in the best interest of the
Town, Town representatives may not sign vendor acknowledgement forms without the approval of the Procurement Office. Please contact the Procurement Office if a contractor refuses to
ship or confirm an order without a signed acknowledgment. 122 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG, VA – PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Revised: January 11, 2022 Page 14 of 60
2.8 Small Purchase Policy Pursuant to VPPA §2.2-4303(G), the purchasing procedures set forth below shall be followed for purchases not requiring competitive sealed bids or competitive
negotiation purchases that are not expected to exceed the corresponding purchase dollar amount thresholds established herein. These procedures shall apply for single or term contracts,
and the aggregate or sum of all phases for single or term contracts shall be included in the total contract amount. Purchases may not be arbitrarily split to constitute a small purchase.
Nothing in this Small Purchase Policy shall prevent the use of competitive sealed bidding or competitive negotiation in procurements less than the VPPA formal solicitation limit if
properly documented and deemed appropriate by the Chief Procurement Officer or designee(s). 1. Purchasing Thresholds Type of Purchase Estimated Contract Amount Competitive Quote Requirement
Goods, construction, insurance and other than professional services Single or spot purchases $0 - $4,999 One (1) single quote Single or spot purchases $5,000 - $49,999 Three (3)
written quotes Single or spot purchases $50,000 - $200,000 (VPPA formal solicitation limit) Four (4) written quotes Multi-year or term purchases $0 – $200,000 (VPPA formal solicitation
limit) Written informal/unsealed solicitation Transportation-related Construction Single or spot purchases $0 - $25,000 (VPPA formal solicitation limit) Three (3) written quotes
Multi-year or term purchases $0 – $25,000 (VPPA formal solicitation limit) Written informal/unsealed solicitation Professional Services Single or spot purchases and multi-year or term
purchases $0 - $80,000 (VPPA formal solicitation limit) Written informal/unsealed solicitation 123 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG, VA – PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Revised:
January 11, 2022 Page 15 of 60 2. Quote Documentation Price quotes are to be obtained from the number of required sources as identified in the purchasing thresholds, as it is practicable.
If the number of required written quotes cannot be obtained, a written justification for lack of competitive quotes is required. Verbal quotes are acceptable in lieu of a written
quote, provided all pertinent information is properly documented. Proper documentation includes: item description, date and time of quotation, company name, quoted unit and extended
price, and name of authorized representative providing the quotation. Telephone quotations, catalogue comparisons, written quotes or other similar quotes may be obtained, as is practicable.
Purchases made within this Small Purchase Policy may be made using the Town’s Purchase Card Policy. For purchases within the Purchase Card Policy, please refer to Section 4 Purchase
Card Policy. 3. Public Posting Requirements All written informal solicitations shall be posted on the Town of Leesburg’s Bid Board (https://www.leesburgva.gov/bidboard) and/or the
Commonwealth of Virginia eProcurement website (https://eva.virginia.gov/). 4. Method of Award For purchases of goods, construction, insurance, services other than professional services,
and transportation-related construction, the award of the purchase shall be made to the bidder quoting the lowest price unless it is documented in writing that the award to another
bidder quoting a higher price is in the best interest of the Town. For purchases of professional services, the award of the purchase shall be made to the offeror whose proposal is
in the best interest of the Town, in considering the Town’s evaluation criteria set forth in the solicitation. Price can be considered at the proposal stage for purchases of professional
services made under this Small Purchase Policy. Negotiations, although encouraged, is not required for purchases of professional services made under this Small Purchase Policy. SECTION
3 METHODS OF PROCUREMENT 3.1 Cooperative Procurement 124 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG, VA – PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Revised: January 11, 2022 Page 16 of 60 The
Town shall have all cooperative procurement authority conferred by VPPA §2.24304. Pursuant to VPPA §2.2-4304, the Town may participate in, sponsor, conduct, or administer a joint procurement
agreement on behalf of or in conjunction with one or more other public bodies, or public agencies or institutions or localities of the several states, of the United States or its territories,
the District of Columbia, the U.S. General Services Administration, or the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments, for the purpose of combining requirements to increase efficiency
or reduce administrative expenses in any acquisition of goods, services, or construction. In addition, the Town may purchase from another public body’s contract or from the contract
of the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments or the Virginia Sheriffs’ Association even if it did not participate in the request for proposal or invitation to bid, if the request
for proposal or invitation to bid specified that the procurement was a cooperative procurement being conducted on behalf of other public bodies, except for contracts for architectural/engineering
services and construction. Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to prohibit sole source or emergency procurements awarded pursuant to VPPA §2.2-4303 (E) and §2.2-4303(F).
Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to prohibit obtaining another quote to confirm that cooperative contract pricing is fair and reasonable for the Town. Purchasing from the
contracts of other public bodies is not appropriate where the Procurement Office or the Town Attorney or designee(s) determines that the terms and conditions are inconsistent with the
legal requirements and best interests of the Town. 3.2 Informal Solicitations Under Small Purchase Policy Nothing in this Policy shall prevent the use of competitive sealed bidding
or competitive negotiation in procurement less than the VPPA formal solicitation limit if properly documented and deemed appropriate by the Chief Procurement Officer or designee(s).
1. Request for Quotation (RFQ) “Request for Quotation” means to request a quote from one or more vendors under an open market procurement where the estimated cost is less than the
VPPA formal solicitation limit (generally $200,000, see Section 2.7). This procurement method is the preferred method for single or spot purchases. A record of the quotation must be
kept on file and should include: name and address of vendors contacted, the item description or service offered, price quoted, delivery date and other information such as F.O.B. point,
names of persons giving and receiving the prices, and the date the quote was obtained. A reasonable amount of time should be allowed for vendors to respond based on the nature of the
procurement. 125 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG, VA – PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Revised: January 11, 2022 Page 17 of 60 2. Informal Solicitation An informal solicitation
is the preferred method for procuring multi-year or term contracts for goods, services (other than Professional Services), insurance and non-transportation construction estimated at
$200,000 or less; an informal solicitation is the preferred method for professional services estimated $80,000 or less. The aggregate or sum of all phases for single or term contracts
shall be included in the total contract amount. All purchases using this procurement method shall be processed by the Procurement Office with assistance from the lead department for
specifications and expertise. The Town’s general and any special terms and conditions that govern the purchase must be included in the unsealed invitation for bid or unsealed request
for proposal. The informal solicitation shall be open for the period of time stated in the solicitation but must be open for at least three (3) business days. A reasonable amount of
time should be allowed for vendors to respond based on the nature of the procurement and any subsequent amendments. Notice of the solicitation shall be posted on either the Town of
Leesburg website or the Commonwealth of Virginia eProcurement website. All bids and proposals in response to the solicitation must be received at the designated location by the date
and time specified in the solicitation. Responses may be opened and evaluated upon receipt. The method of award for bids in response to an informal solicitation shall be made to
the bidder quoting the lowest price unless it is documented in writing that the award to another bidder quoting a higher price is in the best interest of the Town. The method of award
for proposals in response to an informal solicitation shall be made to the offeror whose proposal is in the best interest of the Town, in considering the Town’s evaluation criteria
set forth in the solicitation. Price can be considered at the proposal stage for purchases of professional services made under this Small Purchase Policy. Negotiations, although encouraged,
are not required for purchases made under this Small Purchase Policy. 126 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG, VA – PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Revised: January 11, 2022
Page 18 of 60 3.3 Invitation for Bid (IFB) or Competitive Sealed Bidding An Invitation for Bid (IFB), also referred to as competitive sealed bidding, is a formal solicitation that
contains specifications or scope of work, contractual terms and conditions, and any relevant requirements and information applicable to the procurement. In a competitive sealed bidding
process, all bids must be held unopened until the date and time specified in the solicitation. The solicitation shall be posted on the Town of Leesburg’s Bid Board (https://www.leesburgva.gov/bidboa
rd) and the Commonwealth of Virginia eProcurement website (https://eva.virginia.gov/). 1. Qualifications of Potential Contractors Pursuant to VPPA § 2.2-4302.1.1, unless the Town
has provided for pre-qualification of bidders through a pre-qualification process, the IFB shall include a statement of any qualifications required of potential contractors. 2. Comments
Concerning Specifications Pursuant to VPPA §2.2-4316, unless otherwise instructed in the solicitation, the Procurement Office is the sole point of contact for questions or comments
concerning specifications or other provisions in IFB. Questions or comments concerning specifications must be made in writing and received by the Town by the question deadline specified
in the IFB, which shall be at least ten (10) calendar days prior to the bid due date. Any interpretation deemed to be material in nature or that alters the scope of the goods or services
being requested will be expressed in the form of a written addendum. Such addendum will be posted on the Town’s website and emailed to all properly registered bidders at least seven
(7) calendar days prior to the bid due date. Verbal communications will not be binding. 3. Pre-Bid Conference A pre-bid conference is held when requested by the lead department
and/or as deemed appropriate by the Procurement Office. Generally, a pre-bid conference is conducted with bidders when the solicitation is complex, contains critical requirements,
or requires a visit of the construction work site. The purpose of the pre-bid conference is to encourage competition through an increased understanding of the specifications and terms
and conditions and provides an opportunity to clarify any requirements, eliminate potential ambiguities, and allows vendor input. Attendance at the pre-bid conference by the vendors
may be optional or mandatory as stated in the solicitation. When mandatory attendance is required, only bids from those firms represented at the conference or site visit will be accepted.
Any changes to the solicitation as a result of the pre-bid conference will be in the form of a written addendum posted on the Town’s website or other appropriate websites. 127 Item
g. TOWN OF LEESBURG, VA – PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Revised: January 11, 2022 Page 19 of 60 4. Bid Receipt & Public Bid Opening It is the responsibility of the
bidder to assure that its bid is received by the Town prior to the date and time specified for the receipt of bids. Bids received after the time designed for receipt of bids will not
be considered. Bids shall be opened publicly in the presence of one or more witness at the date and time specified in the IFB. The Procurement Office or department representative,
whose duty it is to open bids, will conduct the public bid opening and will decide when the specified time has arrived. The Town is not responsible for the premature opening of any
bids not properly addressed. A representative from the originating department should also be present to witness the bid opening. The amount of each bid, the name of the bidder, and
such other relevant information shall be read aloud and recorded. Questions concerning the bids shall not be answered until after the bid evaluation from the Town is complete and an
intent to award is made. Except when the Town decides not to accept any of the bids, within a reasonable time after the public bid opening and prior to the award, a tabulation of all
bids received shall be made available to the public. Upon request, bid documents shall be available to any competitive sealed bidder for inspection. Bid documents shall be available
for inspection by the general public only after award of the contract. Any request to inspect bid records shall be in accordance with VPPA §2.2-4342. 5. Negotiation with the Lowest
Responsible Bidder Pursuant to VPPA §2.2-4318, if the bid from the lowest responsible bidder exceeds available funds, the Town may negotiate with the apparent low bidder to obtain
a contract price with available funds if the solicitation contains the following clause: “Unless all bids are cancelled or rejected, the Town reserves the right granted by Section 2.2-4318
of the Code of Virginia to negotiate with the lowest responsive, responsible bidder to obtain a contract price within the funds available. For the purpose of determining when such
negotiations may take place, the term “available funds” shall mean those funds which were budgeted by the Town for this contract prior to the issuance of the written Invitation to Bid.
Negotiations with the low bidder may include both modifications of the bid price and the Scope of Work/Specifications to be performed. The Town shall initiate such negotiations by
written notice to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder that its bid exceeds the available funds and that the Town wishes to negotiate a lower contract price. The times, places,
and manner of negotiating shall be agreed to by the Town and the lowest responsive, responsible bidder.” 128 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG, VA – PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL
Revised: January 11, 2022 Page 20 of 60 This clause may be used only in an Invitation to Bid (IFB) for goods or services in those circumstances where, due to unknown cost factors,
there may be a need to negotiate to remain within available funds. This clause shall not be used as a matter of routine. If the Chief Procurement Officer or designee(s) decides to
negotiate in such circumstances, the decision must be documented in writing in advance of the negotiations. Otherwise, unless canceled or rejected, a responsive bid from the lowest
responsible bidder shall be accepted as submitted. “Available funds” are those budgeted by the Town for the requirement and designated as such prior to the issuance of the IFB. The
purpose of this provision is not to force a bidder to take a lower price but rather to negotiate an acceptable change in requirements, including price, that is agreeable to both parties.
Negotiations might include an extended delivery date, reduced quantity, different accessories, etc., with a corresponding reduction in price. 6. Withdrawal of Bid Due to Error Pursuant
to VPPA §2.2-4330, no bidder who is permitted to withdraw a bid shall, for compensation, supply any material or labor to or perform any subcontract or other work agreement for the person
or firm to whom the contract is awarded or otherwise benefit, directly or indirectly, from the performance of the project for which the withdrawn bid was submitted. If the Town denies
the request for withdrawal of a bid under the provisions of this section, it shall notify the bidder in writing stating the reasons for its decision and award the contract to such bidder
at the bid price, provided such bidder is a responsive and responsible bidder. No bid may be withdrawn when the result would be the awarding of the contract on another bid of the same
bidder or of another bidder in which the ownership of the withdrawing bidder is more than five percent. If a bid is withdrawn, the lowest remaining bid shall be deemed to be the apparent
low bid. a. Withdrawal of Bid PRIOR to Bid Opening: A bid may be withdrawn by a bidder if the Chief Procurement Officer receives such a request in writing prior to the receipt date
and time for bids. The request must be submitted by a person authorized to represent the person or firm that submitted the bid/proposal. b. Amendments of Bid PRIOR to Bid Opening:
Due to the nature of the competitive sealed bidding, amendments to bids already submitted to the Town are not authorized. If a bidder would like to amend its bid, it must withdraw its
bid and resubmit its bid prior to the receipt date and time for bids. 129 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG, VA – PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Revised: January 11, 2022 Page
21 of 60 c. Withdrawal of Bid AFTER Bid Opening: Bids may not be withdrawn if the mistakes are attributable to errors in judgment, nor may such mistakes be waived or corrected. If
the mistake and the intended correct bid are clearly evident in the bid document, the bid shall be corrected to the intended correct bid and may not be withdrawn. Examples of mistakes
that may be clearly evident in the bid document are typographical errors, errors in extending unit prices, transposition errors, and arithmetical errors. A bidder may be permitted
to withdraw a low bid if a mistake is clearly evident from the bid documents submitted by the bidder and/or a comparison with other bids, provided the notice is received in writing
and within two (2) business days after the Bid Opening. d. Withdrawal of Bid During Bid Evaluation: If the lowest apparent responsive bid is 25% or more less than the next low bid,
the Town may contact the bidder to confirm the bid price. If the bidder is able to verify, to the satisfaction of the Chief Procurement Officer, that it was a nonjudgmental mistake,
the bid may be withdrawn. e. Withdrawal of Bid After Award. Bids containing mistakes shall not be corrected or withdrawn after award of a contract or issuance of a purchase order.
No plea or claim of mistake in a bid or resulting contract shall be available as a defense in any legal proceeding brought upon a contract or purchase order awarded to a bidder as
a result of the breach or nonperformance of such contract or purchase order. 7. Waiver of Informalities An informality is a minor defect or variation of a bid from the exact requirements
of the Invitation for Bid which does not affect the price, quality, quantity, or delivery schedule for the goods, services, or construction being procured. The Chief Procurement Officer
may, in its sole discretion, waive such informalities or permit the bidder to correct them, whichever is in the best interest of the Town. Examples include, but are not limited to,
failure of a bidder to: Return the number of signed bids required by the solicitation. Sign the face of the bid in the space provided, but only if the unsigned bid is accompanied
by other signed documents indicating the bidder’s intent to be bound. Acknowledge receipt of an addendum to the solicitation, but only if it is clear from the bid that the bidder
received the addendum and intended to be bound by its terms, or the addendum involved had a negligible effect on price, quantity, quality, or delivery. 130 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG,
VA – PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Revised: January 11, 2022 Page 22 of 60 8. Bid Evaluation & Award After the bid opening, each bid is evaluated to determine if it
is responsive to the IFB. The responsive bids are then evaluated according to the criteria and/or evaluation procedure described in the IFB to determine which is the lowest bid. The
contract is awarded to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. For bids in response to construction services, the unit bid prices are evaluated with the Town’s cost estimate.
Items that have a significant deviation or variance from the cost estimate may be deemed unbalanced and require further evaluation. 9. Cancellation and Rejection of Bids Pursuant
to VPPA §2.2-4319, the Town may cancel an IFB or reject all bids at any time prior to making an award. The reasons for cancellation or rejection shall be made part of the contract file.
The Town cannot cancel an Invitation for Bid solely to avoid awarding a contract to a particular bidder. 3.4 Construction Management and Design-Build Contracting 1. General Policy
Guidelines a. The Town may enter into a contract for construction on a fixed price or not-toexceed price construction management or design-build basis, provided that the Town (i) complies
with the requirements of Virginia Code § 2.2-4382 and (ii) has by ordinance or resolution implemented procedures as required by Section 3.4(1)(d), which procedures shall be incorporated
into Appendix A of this Procurement Policies and Procedures Manual. b. Prior to making a determination as to the use of construction management or design-build for a specific construction
project, the Town shall have in its employ or under contract a licensed architect or engineer with professional competence appropriate to the project who shall (i) advise the Town regarding
the use of construction management or design-build for that project and (ii) assist the Town with the preparation of the Request for Proposal and the evaluation of such proposals.
c. A written determination shall be made in advance by the Town that competitive sealed bidding is not practicable or fiscally advantageous, and such writing shall document the basis
for the determination to utilize construction management or design-build. The determination shall be included in the Request for Qualifications 131 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG, VA – PROCUREMENT
POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Revised: January 11, 2022 Page 23 of 60 and be maintained in the procurement file. d. Procedures adopted by the Town for construction management and
design-build contracts shall include the requirements set forth in Virginia Code § 2.2-4382, as it may be amended from time to time, and shall be consistent with the procedures adopted
by the State Secretary of Administration for utilizing construction management or design-build contracts, as they may be amended from time to time. 3.5 Job Order Contracting (JOC)
Job order contracting is a method of procuring construction by establishing a book of unit prices and then obtaining a contractor to perform work as needed using the prices, quantities,
and specifications in the book as the basis of its pricing. The contractor may be selected through either competitive sealed bidding or competitive negotiation depending on the needs
of the Town. The contract term and the project amount shall not exceed the limitations specified in VPPA § 2.2-4303.2, and as provided below. The solicitation shall be posted on the
Town of Leesburg’s Bid Board (https://www.leesburgva.gov/bidboard) and the Commonwealth of Virginia eProcurement website (https://eva.virginia.gov/). 1. Limitations a. A job order
contract may be awarded by the Town for multiple jobs, provided (i) the jobs require similar experience and expertise, (ii) the nature of the jobs is clearly identified in the solicitation,
and (iii) the contract is limited to a term of one year or when the cumulative total project fees reach the maximum authorized in this section, whichever occurs first. Contractors
may be selected through either competitive sealed bidding or competitive negotiation. b. Such contracts may be renewable for two additional one-year terms at the option of the Town.
The fair and reasonable prices as negotiated shall be used in determining the cost of each job performed, and the sum of all jobs performed in a one-year contract term shall not exceed
the maximum threshold amount of $6 Million. Subject to the maximum threshold amount, no individual job order shall exceed $500,000. c. Any unused amounts from one contract term shall
not be carried forward to any additional term. 132 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG, VA – PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Revised: January 11, 2022 Page 24 of 60 d. Order splitting
with the intent of keeping the job order under the maximum dollar amounts is prohibited. e. The Town shall not issue or use a job order, under a job order contract, solely for the
purpose of receiving professional architectural or engineering services that constitute the practice of architecture or the practice of engineering as those terms are defined in Virginia
Code § 54.1-400. However, professional architectural or engineering services may be included on a job order where such professional services (i) are incidental and directly related
to the job, (ii) do not exceed $25,000 per job order, and (iii) do not exceed $75,000 per contract term. f. Job order contracting shall not be used for construction, maintenance, or
asset management services for a highway, bridge, tunnel, or overpass. However, job order contracting may be used for safety improvements or traffic calming measures for individual job
orders up to $250,000, subject to the maximum annual threshold amount established in this section. 3.6 Request for Information (RFI) A Request for Information (RFI) is an informal
document issued when the Town is not aware of the products available in the market which may satisfy its requirements. The use of an RFI does not require a purchase requisition, however
a RFI may result in the development of a requisition, or the issuance of an IFB or RFP after the Town determines the types of products that are available which will satisfy its requirements.
An RFI cannot be made into an agreement. 3.7 Pre-Qualification for Construction VPPA § 2.2-4317 allows public bodies to adopt procedures to solicit and prequalify potential contractors.
In such cases, a list is maintained of those who have been evaluated and prequalified and determined to be acceptable in meeting minimum quality or performance standards pre-established
by the Town. This qualification is performed in advance of the anticipated procurement or solicitation requiring competitive sealed bids, or as the first step in a two-step design-build
solicitation process. By having a prequalification procedure, the time in the purchase cycle can be reduced, as solicitations are only sent to those contractors determined to be qualified.
The qualification requirements must be established and potential contractors advised by letter and/or public posting sufficiently in advance of the anticipated procurement to allow
for evaluation and qualification of potential contractors and/or products. The following guidelines shall apply to prequalification procedures: 133 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG, VA –
PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Revised: January 11, 2022 Page 25 of 60 1. General Policy Guidelines a. Prospective contractors may be prequalified for particular types
of supplies, services, insurance or construction, and consideration of bids or proposals limited to prequalified contractors. Any prequalification procedure shall be established by
the Chief Procurement Officer in writing and sufficiently in advance of its implementation to allow potential contractors a fair opportunity to complete the process. 2. Prequalification
for Construction Any prequalification of prospective contractors for construction by the Town shall include: a. A written request for qualifications (RFQ) WILL BE ISSUED BY THE Town
and shall include an application form that sets forth the criteria upon which the qualifications of prospective contractors will be evaluated. The application form shall request of
prospective contractors only such information as is appropriate for an objective evaluation of all prospective contractors pursuant to such criteria. The form shall allow the prospective
contractor seeking prequalification to request, by checking the appropriate box, that all information voluntarily submitted by the contractor pursuant to this subsection shall be considered
a trade secret or proprietary information subject to the provisions of subsection D of VPPA § 2.2-4342. b. In all instances in which the Town requires prequalification of potential
contractors for construction projects, advance notice shall be given of the deadline for the submission of prequalification applications. The deadline for submission shall be sufficiently
in advance of the date set for the submission of bids for such construction so as to allow the procedures set forth in this subsection to be accomplished. c. At least 30 days prior
to the date established for submission of bids or proposals under the procurement of the contract for which the prequalification applies, the Town shall advise in writing each contractor
who submitted an application whether that contractor has been prequalified. In the event that a contractor is denied prequalification, the written notification to the contractor shall
state the reasons for the denial of prequalification and the factual basis of such reasons. d. A decision by the Town denying prequalification under the provisions of this subsection
shall be final and conclusive unless the contractor appeals 134 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG, VA – PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Revised: January 11, 2022 Page 26 of 60
the decision as provided in VPPA§ 2.2-4357. 3. Denial of Prequalification The Town may deny prequalification to any contractor only if the Town finds one of the following: a. The
contractor does not have sufficient financial ability to perform the contract that would result from such procurement. If a bond is required to ensure performance of a contract, evidence
that the contractor can acquire a surety bond from a corporation included on the United States Treasury list of acceptable surety corporations in the amount and type required by the
Town shall be sufficient to establish the financial ability of the contractor to perform the contract resulting from such procurement; b. The contractor does not have appropriate experience
to perform the construction project in question; c. The contractor or any officer, director or owner thereof has had judgments entered against him within the past ten years for the
breach of contracts for governmental or nongovernmental construction, including, but not limited to, design-build or construction management; d. The contractor has been in substantial
noncompliance with the terms and conditions of prior construction contracts with the Town without good cause. If Town has not contracted with a contractor in any prior construction
contracts, the Town may deny prequalification if the contractor has been in substantial noncompliance with the terms and conditions of comparable construction contracts with another
public body without good cause. The Town may not utilize this provision to deny prequalification unless the facts underlying such substantial noncompliance were documented in writing
in the prior construction project file and such information relating thereto given to the contractor at that time, with the opportunity to respond; e. The contractor or any officer,
director, owner, project manager, procurement manager or chief financial official thereof has been convicted within the past ten years of a crime related to governmental or nongovernmental
construction or contracting, including, but not limited to, a violation of (i) Article 6 of the VPPA (Ethics in Public Contracting, § 2.2-4367 et seq.), (ii) the Virginia Governmental
Frauds Act (§ 18.2-498.1 et seq.), (iii) Chapter 4.2 (§ 59.1-68.6 et seq.) of Title 59.1 (Conspiracy to 135 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG, VA – PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL
Revised: January 11, 2022 Page 27 of 60 Rig Bids to Government), or (iv) any substantially similar law of the United States or another state; f. The contractor or any officer, director
or owner thereof is currently debarred pursuant to an established debarment procedure from bidding or contracting by any public body, agency of another state or agency of the federal
government; and g. The contractor failed to provide to the Town in a timely manner any information requested by the Town relevant to subdivisions (a) through (f) of this subsection.
The provisions of subsections 2 and 3 shall not apply to prequalification for contracts let under the Code of Virginia § 33.2-209, 33.2-214, or 33.2-221. 3.8 Request for Proposal
(RFP) A Request for Proposal (RFP), also referred to as competitive negotiation, is a formal solicitation that describes in general terms the requirements, the factors that will be
used to evaluate the proposals received, the Town’s terms and conditions, any special conditions or qualifications that will be required, including those attached or incorporated by
reference and addendum. In a competitive negotiation process, all proposal responses must be held unopened until the date and time specified in the solicitation. (Reference: VPPA §2.2-4302.2)
1. Comments Concerning Specifications Pursuant to VPPA §2.2-4316, unless otherwise instructed in the solicitation, the Procurement Office is the sole point of contact for questions
or comments concerning specifications or other provisions in RFP. Questions or comments concerning specifications must be made in writing and received by the Town by the question deadline
specified in the RFP at least ten (10) calendar days prior to the proposal due date. Any interpretation deemed to be material in nature or that alters the needs of the goods or services
being requested will be expressed in the form of a written addendum. Such addendum will be posted on the Town’s website and emailed to all properly registered offerors at least seven
(7) calendar days prior to the proposal due date. Verbal communications will not be binding. 2. Pre-Proposal Conference A pre-proposal conference is held when requested by the using
department and/or as deemed appropriate by the Procurement Office. Generally, a pre-proposal conference 136 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG, VA – PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL
Revised: January 11, 2022 Page 28 of 60 is conducted with offerors when the solicitation is complex, contains critical requirements, or requires a site visit. The purpose of the
pre-proposal conference is to encourage competition through an increased understanding of the specifications and terms and conditions and provides an opportunity to clarify any requirements,
eliminate potential ambiguities, and allows vendor input. Attendance at the pre-proposal conference by the vendors may be optional or mandatory as stated in the solicitation. When
mandatory attendance is required, only proposals from those firms represented at the conference or site visit will be accepted. Any changes to the solicitation as a result of the pre-proposal
conference will be in the form of a written addendum posted on the Town’s website or other appropriate websites. 3. Proposal Receipt & Public Opening It is the responsibility of the
offeror to assure that its proposal is received by the Town prior to the date and time specified for the receipt of proposals. Proposals received after the time designed for receipt
of proposal will not be considered. Public openings of proposals are not required. If a public opening is held, the names of the individuals, or the names of firms submitting proposals
in a timely manner, is the only information read aloud and made available to the offerors and general public. 4. Proposal Evaluation, Negotiation, & Award for Goods and Non-Professional
Services For goods and non-professional services, proposals are evaluated by the Procurement Office and the evaluation committee, which is comprised of stakeholders within the Town.
All RFP responses are to be evaluated. Proposals not meeting requirements should be scored lower. Only bids in response to an IFB may be determined to be nonresponsive. Proposals
are evaluated on the basis of the criteria set forth in the RFP, using the scoring weights previously determined. The evaluation committee may request presentations or discussions with
offerors, as necessary, to clarify material in the offerors proposals, to help determine those fully qualified and best suited. Offerors may be given an opportunity to correct a deficiency
in their proposals, within an appropriate period of time, as determined by the Procurement Office. Offerors who fail to submit required documentation or meet mandatory requirements,
in such time, for evaluation purposes may be eliminated from further consideration. Two or more offerors determined to be fully qualified and best suited are then selected for negotiation.
Price is considered but need not be the sole determining factor. During the evaluation phase it may be determined by the evaluation committee that only one offeror is fully qualified,
or that one offeror is CLEARLY more highly qualified than the others under consideration. A written determination shall be prepared and retained in the contract file to document the
meaningful and convincing facts supporting the decision for selecting only one offeror and negotiating with that offeror. The determination shall be signed by the agency head or designee.
137 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG, VA – PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Revised: January 11, 2022 Page 29 of 60 Negotiations are conducted with each of the offerors so selected.
Negotiation allows modification of proposals, including price. Offers and counter-offers may be made as many times with each offeror as is necessary to secure a reasonable contract.
Unless there have been no changes in any of the items negotiated or only one proposal is under consideration, after negotiations have been conducted with each of the selected offerors,
the evaluation committee may select the offeror through a consensus or proposals may be re-scored. The Town will select the offeror which, in its opinion, has made the best proposal.
In all cases, written confirmation shall be obtained from the offeror on any modifications of the original proposal. Once a Notice of Intent to Award is posted, no further negotiation
shall be conducted. When a provision for receiving best and final offers (BAFO) is included in the RFP, after negotiations, offerors are given the opportunity to submit a best and
final offer. After the offeror submits a BAFO, no further negotiation shall take place with that offeror. The offeror’s proposal, if already received and scored, may be rescored to
combine and include the information contained in the BAFO with the technical evaluation score previously assigned, and the award decision made. The contract file shall be documented
to show the basis for the award and include the final rescoring of the proposals following negotiation and receipt of best and final offers. For competitively negotiated procurements,
once evaluation and negotiations have been completed with selected offeror(s), the Procurement Office must prepare a written narrative summarizing the rationale for the ratings that
are developed for each proposal negotiated. The summary shall address the merits of the proposal relative to the evaluation ratings and shall not compare proposals to each other. Pursuant
to VPPA §2.2-4359(D), the Town is not required to furnish a statement of the reason why a particular proposal was not deemed to be the most advantageous. Pursuant to VPPA §2.2-4342(D),
offerors may inspect the proposal records after evaluation and negotiations are complete, but prior to award. 5. Proposal Evaluation, Negotiation, & Award for Professional Services
For professional services, the Town shall engage in individual discussions with two or more offerors deemed fully qualified, responsible and suitable on the basis of initial responses
and with emphasis on professional competence, to provide the required services. Repetitive informal interviews shall be permissible. The offerors shall be encouraged to elaborate on
their qualifications and performance data or staff expertise pertinent to the pro- posed project, as well as alternative concepts. In addition, offerors shall be informed of any ranking
criteria that will be used by the Town in addition to the review of the professional competence of the offeror. The Request for Proposal shall not, however, request that offerors furnish
estimates of man-hours or cost for services. At the discussion stage, the Town may discuss nonbinding estimates of total project costs, including, but not limited to, life-cycle costing,
and where appropriate, nonbinding estimates of price for services. In accordance with VPPA § 2.2-4342, 138 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG, VA – PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL
Revised: January 11, 2022 Page 30 of 60 proprietary information from competing offerors shall not be disclosed to the public or to competitors. For architectural or engineering
services, the Town shall not request or require offerors to list any exceptions to proposed contractual terms and conditions, unless such terms and conditions are required by statute,
regulation, ordinance, or standards developed pursuant to § 2.2-1132, until after the qualified offerors are ranked for negotiations. At the conclusion of discussion, outlined in
this subdivision, on the basis of evaluation factors published in the Request for Proposal and all information developed in the selection process to this point, the Town shall select
in the order of preference two or more offerors whose professional qualifications and proposed services are deemed most meritorious. Negotiations shall then be conducted, beginning
with the offeror ranked first. If a contract satisfactory and advantageous to the Town can be negotiated at a price considered fair and reasonable and pursuant to contractual terms
and conditions acceptable to the Town, the award shall be made to that offeror. Otherwise, negotiations with the offeror ranked first shall be formally terminated and negotiations conducted
with the offeror ranked second, and so on until such a contract can be negotiated at a fair and reasonable price. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the terms and conditions for multiple
awards are included in the Request for Proposal, the Town may award contracts to more than one offeror. Should the Town determine in writing and in its sole discretion that only one
offeror is fully qualified or that one offeror is clearly more highly qualified and suitable than the others under consideration, a contract may be negotiated and awarded to that offeror.
Multiphase professional services contracts satisfactory and advantageous to the completion of large, phased, or long-term projects may be negotiated and awarded based on a fair and
reasonable price for the first phase only, where the completion of the earlier phases is necessary to provide information critical to the negotiation of a fair and reasonable price
for succeeding phases. Prior to entering into any such contract, the Town shall (i) state the anticipated intended total scope of the project and (ii) determine in writing that the
nature of the work is such that the best interests of the Town. 139 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG, VA – PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Revised: January 11, 2022 Page 31
of 60 6. Waiver of Informalities An informality is a minor defect or variation of a proposal from the exact requirements of the Request for Proposal, which does not affect the price,
quality, quantity, or delivery schedule for the goods, services, or construction being procured. The Chief Procurement Officer may, in its sole discretion, waive such informalities
or permit the offeror to correct them, whichever is in the best interest of the Town. Examples include failure of an offeror to: Return the number of signed proposals required by
the solicitation. Sign the face of the proposal in the space provided, but only if the unsigned proposal is accompanied by other signed documents indicating the offeror’s intent to
be bound. Acknowledge receipt of an addendum to the solicitation, but only if it is clear from the proposal that the offeror received the addendum and intended to be bound by its
terms, or the addendum involved had a negligible effect on price, quantity, quality, or delivery. 7. Cancellation and Rejection of Proposals Pursuant to VPPA §2.2-4319, the Town may
cancel an RFP or reject all proposals at any time prior to making an award. The reasons for cancellation or rejection shall be made part of the contract file. The Town cannot cancel
a Request for Proposal solely to avoid awarding a contract to a particular offeror. 140 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG, VA – PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Revised: January
11, 2022 Page 32 of 60 SECTION 4 PURCHASE CARD POLICY 4.1 Purpose It is the Town’s policy to issue Purchase Cards (P-Cards) to Town employees in order to facilitate the purchase
of certain goods and services. In order to safeguard against unauthorized purchases, these policies and procedures must be followed for the issuance of the P-cards, monitoring their
activity, and use by selected Town employees. These procedures are intended to ensure that use of the P-Card is in accordance with the Town’s Procurement Policy and procedures; ensure
that transactions are for authorized purposes through the establishment, and utilization of appropriate internal controls; ensure that the Town bears no legal liability from inappropriate
use of P-Cards; and provide a convenient, cost-effective method for the purchase of goods and services. 4.2 Authority Town Manager or designee(s) or Department Director or designee(s),
also referred to as “Approving Official”, is authorized and responsible for ensuring compliance with these policies and procedures; ensuring purchases are made within the guidelines
of the Town’s Procurement Policy; approving cardholder’s monthly reconciliation submittals and certifying that the charges were necessary and for official Town business and are properly
coded to the correct expense codes; initiating and administering appropriate discipline to employees who violate Town policies and procedures; and collecting cards from terminated employees
and promptly returning them to the P-Card Administrator. Director of Finance and Administrative Services or designee(s) is authorized and responsible for issuing the procedures that
govern the use of P-Cards and overseeing the administration of the P-Card program. Chief Procurement Officer or designee(s), also referred to as the “P-Card Administrator”, is authorized
and responsible for developing and maintaining the P-Card policy and procedures; administering the P-Card program; assisting in the resolution of any cardholder problems; monitoring
P-Card activity to ensure departments and cardholders comply with the procedures; maintaining a liaison with the financial institution issuing the P-card; reviewing the monthly consolidated
reports from the financial institution for unusual activity and compliance with procedures; and reporting problems and areas of noncompliance to the Director of Finance and Administrative
Services and the approving official, or department director. Town Employees or Cardholders are responsible for making purchases which are in compliance with these procedures and
the Town’s Procurement Policy and that all purchases are “For Official Use Only”; providing a complete audit trail of all P-card 141 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG, VA – PROCUREMENT POLICIES
AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Revised: January 11, 2022 Page 33 of 60 transactions; resolving disputes or billing errors directly with merchants and notify the PCard company and the Town’s
P-Card Administrator if the dispute is not resolved; assuring that sales tax is not charged on purchases, unless dictated by law; processing monthly PCard records as set forth herein;
and maintaining the security of the P-Card at all times. 4.3 Policy Guidelines 1. Issuance of P-Card All P-Card applications must be authorized, completed, and signed by the applicable
Department Director. Prior to releasing the P-Card to the cardholder, the Town employee is required to successfully complete p-card training that discusses the policies and procedures
that govern the use the Town’s P-Card program. Upon receipt of the P-Card, the Town employee certifies in a Cardholder Agreement that they understand the policies and procedures that
govern the use of the p-card. The P-Card is embossed with the cardholder’s name and may only be used by that cardholder. Except for an authorized departmental card, the use of the
P-Card is limited to only the person who name appears on the face of the P-Card and no other person is authorized to use the card. Department Directors are not authorized to have a
Town issued P-Card. 2. Approved Uses of P-Card The P-Card shall be used for official Town of Leesburg business purposes only and shall be used in accordance with established procurement
policies. P-Cards may be used for the acquisition of minor supplies or services within the single quote limit of the Small Purchase Policy or for reoccurring charges for goods or services
provided that such purchases are under contract. 3. Limitations/Restrictions of P-Card The P-Card shall be used for official Town of Leesburg business only and shall not be used
for any non-business transactions. The following potential business transactions are restricted and prohibited: alcoholic beverages; cash advances; firearms; and gift cards. Due to
the nature of operations for some departments, entertainment transactions may be authorized by the P-Card Administrator, with concurrence with the Department Director or designee(s),
however they are generally restricted. 142 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG, VA – PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Revised: January 11, 2022 Page 34 of 60 4. Documentation
and Reconciliation The reconciliation of P-Card transactions occurs monthly for cardholders. Documentation of each transaction shall be included with the P-Card cycle reconsolidation
package. This documentation includes a charge slip, cash register tape, paid invoice receipt or a packing slip with pricing and, at a minimum, shall include a description of the item,
quantity, unit cost, date of purchase, and vendor’s name. Purchases for food, beverage, and/or travel shall follow the policy guidelines in the Town’s Personnel Procedures Manual.
5. Card Security P-Cards shall be kept in a secured location. The cardholder is responsible for all purchases made with a Town P-Card and under no circumstances should a p-card be
loaned to another person. Cardholders shall immediately report lost or stolen P-Cards to the P-Card Administrator. The full P-Card account number is to be safeguarded to the fullest
extent possible and shall not to be posted or stored anywhere. In the event of fraudulent use of a P-Card, the cardholder must immediately contact the P-Card Administrator and/or the
P-Card company and follow the instructions given. If the cardholder terminates employment with the Town of Leesburg, the P-Card must be turned in immediately to the Department Director,
Human Resources, or to the Procurement Office. 6. Enforcement of Abuse and/or Other Violations P-card abuses, as noted in this policy, shall follow the following escalation process:
a. Any single fraudulent act committed by an employee will result in an immediate revocation of the individual’s purchasing authority and reported to the employee’s Department Director,
the Director of Finance and Administrative Services, the Director of Human Resources, the Town Manager, and the Leesburg Police Department as it is appropriate. Fraudulent acts or
purchases of personal items on a Town-issued P-Card may result in disciplinary action up to and including employee termination on the first offense as the Town has a zero tolerance
for fraud. b. Abuse includes accidental or careless or inadvertent personal use promptly remedied, purchase of unnecessary or overpriced items, repeated intentional failure to submit
proper accounting codes, failure to get price quotes, and failure to provide reconciliation reports on-time. 143 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG, VA – PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
MANUAL Revised: January 11, 2022 Page 35 of 60 c. Upon the first infraction or instance of abuse, the immediate supervisor and Department Director will be notified of the failure
to comply, and the Cardholder will be immediately counseled as to deviations from the policy by Chief Procurement Officer or designee(s) and user training shall be conducted. d. Upon
three (3) known offenses of abuse within a 12 consecutive month period, the immediate supervisor, Department Director and Director of Human Resources will be notified of the failure
to comply and shall be given a written summary of abuses. An automatic reduction on performance evaluation category for job knowledge, quality of work, and achievement evaluation period
goals, making a superior rating unavailable and may result in the cardholder being placed on a performance improvement plan. Possible removal of P-Card use privilege, as well as possible
administrative leave depending upon the specifics and severity related to the abuse may be conducted. e. Reinstatement of the P-Card use privilege may be requested by the Department
Director or designee(s) thirty (30) days after receipt of removal notice provided training is completed. 144 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG, VA – PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
MANUAL Revised: January 11, 2022 Page 36 of 60 SECTION 5 BID PROTESTS, DEBARMENT, AND OTHER APPEALS 5.1 Bid Protests Chief Procurement Officer or designee(s) serves as the designated
official for all bid protest activities under VPPA § 2.2-4360. 5.2 Debarment It is the policy of the Town of Leesburg to, after reasonable notice to the person involved and reasonable
opportunity for that person to be heard, debar a person or contractor for cause. During the period of debarment, a supplier will not be eligible to receive solicitations or contract
awards, or to have contracts renewed or extended. The debarment shall not be for a period of more than three (3) years. The causes for debarment include but are not limited to: 1.
Conviction for a criminal offense as an incident to obtaining or attempting to obtain a public or private contract or subcontract, or in the performance of such contract or subcontract.
2. Conviction under state or federal anti-trust statutes arising out of the submission of bids or proposals. 3. Unsatisfactory performance on a contract with the Town, including but
not limited to, failure to comply with contract terms and conditions or to meet specification/scope of service requirements. 4. Offering any gift, gratuity, favor, or advantage to any
Town employee who exercises official responsibility for procurement transactions. 5. Failing to disclose a condition constituting a conflict of interest by any officer, director, owner,
partner, or agent of the supplier in a contract or purchase order awarded by the Town. 6. Conviction of any criminal offense, or a judgment in civil litigation, which indicates a lack
of moral or business integrity. It is the supplier’s responsibility to request reinstatement at the end of the debarment period. 145 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG, VA – PROCUREMENT POLICIES
AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Revised: January 11, 2022 Page 37 of 60 5.3 Petition for Recycled Goods and Products Pursuant to VPPA §2.2 – 4313, any person who believes that particular
goods or products with recycled content are functionally equivalent to the same goods or products produced from virgin materials may petition the Chief Procurement Officer to include
the recycled goods or products in its procurement process. The petitioner shall submit documentation which establishes that the goods or products (i) contain recycled content and (ii)
can meet the performance standards set forth in the applicable specifications prior to bid/proposal due date. If the Chief Procurement Officer determines that the documentation demonstrates
that the goods or products with recycled content will meet the performance standards set forth in the applicable specifications, it shall incorporate such goods or products into its
procurement process. 5.4 Petition for Less Toxic Goods and Products Pursuant to VPPA §2.2-4314, any supplier, who manufactures, sells or supplies goods or products may petition the
Chief Procurement Officer to include requirements for less toxic goods and products into its procurement process. The supplier shall submit, prior to or during the procurement process,
documentation which establishes that the goods or products meet the applicable performance standards. If the Chief Procurement Officer determines that the documentation establishes
that the less toxic goods or products meet the performance standards set forth in the applicable specifications, they shall incorporate the specifications for the less toxic goods and
products into their procurement process. The Town will revise procedures and specifications on a continuing basis to encourage the use of less toxic goods and products; however, the
Town is not required to purchase, test or evaluate any particular good or product other than those that would be purchased under regular procurement procedures. 146 Item g. TOWN OF
LEESBURG, VA – PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Revised: January 11, 2022 Page 38 of 60 SECTION 6 CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION Contract administration relies heavily on contract
development. After the contract is awarded, the contract must be administered to ensure that the contractor complies with their obligations and requirements under the contract. Contract
administration includes attending post award and progress meetings, payment of invoices, review of contractor disputes and claims, change orders, contract modifications, and other transactions
in administering the contract. 6.1 Authority Town Council is the governing body of the Town of Leesburg, Virginia. During the performance of a contract, advanced written approval
is required by Town Council to increase a fixed-price contract by more than twenty-five percent (25%) of the amount of the contract or $50,000, whichever is greater. Town Manager
or designee(s) is authorized to execute change orders and contract modifications above the 25% threshold after Town Council award approval is obtained via resolution. The Town Manager
or designee(s) shall have the authority to modify a contract after advisement from the Town Attorney for any contracts within its authority to execute. Chief Procurement Officer or
designee(s) is authorized to process purchase order change orders and execute change orders and contract modifications up to the 25% threshold. The Chief Procurement Officer or designee(s)
shall have the authority to modify a contract after advisement from the Town Attorney for any contracts within its authority to execute. Department Director or designee(s) is authorized
to execute change orders up to the 25% threshold for changes in the work, the cost impact on the contract, and the extent of the adjustment in the contract time, if any. The Department
Director or designee(s) is not authorized to execute contract modifications which bind the Town. 6.2 Change Orders and Contract Modifications “Change Order” means a written authorization
or order to a contract or purchase order, signed by the Town Manager or Contract Administrator or designee(s), which normally establishes a change in the work, the cost impact on the
contract, and the extent of the adjustment in the contract time, if any. A “Contract Amendment, Contract Modification” means a written alteration or modification in specifications,
delivery point, rate of delivery, period of performance, price, quantity, or other provisions of any contract accomplished by mutual action of the parties to the contract. 147 Item
g. TOWN OF LEESBURG, VA – PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Revised: January 11, 2022 Page 39 of 60 Any request for change affecting price, quality, quantity, delivery
or cancellation requires a thorough written explanation by the Town prior to approval. A contractor shall not be notified that a change has been approved until that change has been
authorized by the Department Director, Procurement Office, or designee(s). All change requests should be evaluated for contract validity and a price reasonableness determination of
the change shall be made in writing. 6.3 Contract Renewals and Extensions A term contract may contain a renewal clause describing the conditions under which it may be renewed for
a stipulated period of time. However, no contract may be renewed and no additional consideration may be paid unless specifically provided for in the original contract. Often indices
such as the Consumer Price Index (CPI) or Producer Price Index (PPI) are used as a benchmark in pricing renewal options and assist in determining price reasonableness. Price increases
should not be given automatically at renewal. It is the responsibility of the contractor to request a price increase, if desired, up to the amount authorized by the index referenced
in the contract. The Town may then negotiate the amount of the increase up to the indexed amount. The Town may extend the term of an existing contract for services to allow completion
of any work undertaken but not completed during the original term of the contract. In unforeseen or extenuating circumstances, a contract may be extended by mutual consent for no more
twelve (12) months. 6.4 Distributing Projects for Multiple Award Architectural or Engineering Contracts The contract term and the project amount shall not exceed the limitations
specified in VPPA § 2.2-4303.1, as provided below. 1. Contracting Limitations a. A contract for architectural or professional engineering services may be awarded by the Town for
construction projects, provided (i) the projects require similar experience and expertise, (ii) the nature of the projects is clearly identified in the solicitation, and (iii) the contract
is limited to a term of one year or when the cumulative total project fees reach the maximum authorized in this section, whichever occurs first. Such contracts may be renewable for
four additional one-year terms at the option of the Town. The fair and reasonable prices as negotiated shall be used in determining the cost of each project performed. b. The sum of
all projects performed in a one-year contract term shall not exceed $8 Million and those awarded for any airport as defined in the Code of Virginia § 148 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG, VA
– PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Revised: January 11, 2022 Page 40 of 60 5.1-1 and aviation transportation projects, the sum of all such projects shall not exceed $1.5
million. c. The fee for any single project shall not exceed $2.5 Million; however, for architectural or engineering services for airports as defined in the Code of Virginia §5.1-1
and aviation transportation projects, the project fee of any single project shall not exceed $500,000. 2. Task Orders to Contractors The Task Order will be offered to one or more
of the Architectural or Engineering (A/E) Contractors at the Town’s discretion. The Task Order must include a scope of work, a definition of the product required, a request for a project
schedule and a request for a fee proposal. Upon receipt of the Contractor’s proposal, the Town may award the Task Order deemed to be the best suited for the project. The fee for the
services on each Task Order shall be negotiated individually on a lump sum basis considering the Scope of Services required, the estimated manhours required for each skill level/discipline
and the labor rates agreed upon and listed in the Contract. If an estimate of the time required to perform the Work cannot be reasonably estimated, the A/E may be directed to proceed
with work on an hourly basis with a maximum or not-to exceed amount. The compensation / fee shall be determined by the A/E’s certified record of man-hours expended by classification
/ skill level / discipline and the hourly rates for each as listed in the contract. 6.5 Contract Task Orders Department Director or designee(s) is not authorized to execute task orders
that bind the Town for the purchase of goods, services, insurance or construction and authorize a contractor to proceed with an order unless a written exception and delegation is given
by the Town Manager during an official declared emergency. 6.6 Prompt Pay Act for Localities Unless agreed to otherwise in writing, the Town will pay invoices in accordance with
the Prompt Pay Act for localities or within forty-five (45) days after goods or services are received or the invoice is rendered, whichever is later. 149 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG,
VA – PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Revised: January 11, 2022 Page 41 of 60 SECTION 7 SMALL, WOMAN, AND MINORITY OWNED BUSINESS PROGRAM The Town will undertake every
reasonable effort to increase the opportunity for participation in the procurement process by small, minority, women, and service--disabled veteran-owned firms. Town employees with
purchasing responsibility are expected to notify and give every reasonable consideration to using qualified small business suppliers for their procurement needs. Whenever the Town
engages in a solicitation or request for quotes that exceed $50,000, it will post the notice on either the Town of Leesburg’s Bid Board (https://www.leesburgva.gov/bidboard) and/or
the Commonwealth of Virginia eProcurement website (https://eva.virginia.gov/). Additionally, the Procurement Office will participate in training seminars for the purpose of informing
small, minority, women, and service-disabled veteran-owned bidders of the procurement opportunities and procedures; participate to the maximum extent possible in all local and regional
vendor or procurement fairs for small, minority, women, and service-disabled veteran-owned businesses; and cooperate with the Department of Minority Business Enterprise, the United
States Small Business Administration, and other public or private agencies. While the Town encourages participation in the procurement process to small, minority, women, and service-disabled
veteran-owned businesses, it does not give preference to categories of businesses and has not adopted set-aside contracting and will not set-aside portions of the award of the contract.
(See Virginia Code § 15.2-965.1 which allows but does not require localities to adopt such measures.) 150 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG, VA – PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL
Revised: January 11, 2022 Page 42 of 60 SECTION 8 SURPLUS PROPERTY POLICY It is the policy of the Town of Leesburg that surplus property or supplies no longer having monetary value
and usefulness to the Town shall be disposed of in accordance with the Surplus Property Policy and Procedures. Department Directors or designee(s) are responsible for the disposition
of Town assets. Town employees and their immediate families are not authorized to participate in surplus auctions per the Town Surplus Auction Terms and Conditions. Notice of the disposal
is posted on the Public Surplus website (https://www.publicsurplus.com) or other appropriate websites. The Town’s Surplus Auctions Terms and Conditions, included as Appendix C to this
Policy, shall be used for all surplus auctions by all Town employees who have the responsibility for a procurement transaction. Unless agreed to otherwise in writing, all vendors who
wish to do business with the Town must adhere to the Surplus Auctions Terms and Conditions. Disposal of any asset acquired with state or federal grant funding or tax-exempt General
Obligation bonds must be done in compliance with the original grant agreement and applicable state or federal grant regulations related to asset disposals. If in doubt about the applicability
of such restrictions the person seeking to dispose of any such asset must contact the Director of Finance and Administrative Services, Controller or Accounting Manager for assistance
before disposing of the asset. Failure to do so may result in the Town having to make restitution or pay penalties to the grantor agency or to the Internal Revenue Service. NOTE:
Town of Leesburg employees can access the procurement charts, checklists, and forms that were referenced throughout this Policies and Procedures Manual on the Town’s Employee Portal:
https://employee.leesburgva.gov/DEPARTMENTS/Finance/Procurement. 151 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG, VA – PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Revised: January 11, 2022 Page 43
of 60 SECTION 9 VENDOR MANUAL AND DOING BUSINESS WITH THE TOWN It is the policy of the Town of Leesburg that qualified vendors have access to public business and that no offeror be
arbitrarily or capriciously excluded, that competition be sought to the maximum feasible degree, that procurement procedures involve openness and administrative efficiency, that individual
public bodies enjoy broad flexibility in fashioning details of such competition, that the rules governing contract awards be made clear in advance of the competition, that specifications
reflect the procurement needs of the Town rather than being drawn to favor a particular vendor, and that the Town and vendor freely exchange information concerning what is sought to
be procured and what is offered. A copy of the vendor’s guide on how to do business with the Town can be found on the Town’s Procurement Website: https://www.leesburgva.gov/departments/finance/procu
rement. 152 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG, VA – PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Revised: January 11, 2022 Page 44 of 60 SECTION 10 PROCUREMENT VIOLATION POLICY 10.1 Definitions
For purposes of this policy, the terms defined in this section have the meanings ascribed to them in this section unless the context clearly indicates that another meaning is intended.
1. “Procurement Violation” is a general term used to describe a purchase made by a Town official or employee that does not comply with established procurement policy. A “Procurement
Violation” is either categorized as an “Improper Procurement” or an “Unauthorized Purchase”. 2. “Improper Procurement” refers to a purchase made by a Town official or employee which
does not comply with established procurement policy and (i) is not over the Small Purchase threshold and (ii) the department has available funds. An “Improper Procurement” may be ratified
in accordance with the requirements of this policy. 3. "Unauthorized Purchase" means a purchase made (i) over the Small Purchase threshold and not in compliance with procurement laws
or (ii) without available funds. An "Unauthorized Purchase" cannot typically be cured by ratification. 4. "Ratification" or “Ratify” refers to the process for legitimizing (i.e., approving)
a purchase made by a Town official or employee which does not comply with established procurement policy. 10.2 Policy All public contracts with nongovernmental contractors for the
purchase or lease of goods, or for the purchase of services, insurance, or construction, shall be awarded after competitive sealed bidding or competitive negotiation pursuant to the
Virginia Public Procurement Act (VPPA) and Town Policies, unless otherwise or exempted by law, statute, or regulation. These policies apply whether the consideration is monetary or
nonmonetary and regardless of whether the Town, the contractor, or a third party is providing the consideration. The Town prohibits officials and employees from procuring or contracting
for any goods, services, insurance, or construction in a manner in which is not in compliance with procurement policies contained herein. The Town shall not be bound by any purchase
order or contract made (i) contrary to the procurement laws or (ii) when sufficient funds are not available. In addition, Town Code Sec 2-158(b), prohibits the expenditure of funds
or the incurrence of obligations in the absence of a valid appropriation as certified by the Director of Finance and Administrative Services or his or her designee thereof. 153 Item
g. TOWN OF LEESBURG, VA – PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Revised: January 11, 2022 Page 45 of 60 Any official or employee who knowingly authorizes or makes payment without
appropriated funds available or knowingly takes part therein shall be personally responsible for the full amount so paid or received. Additionally, contractors and every person who
shall knowingly receive such payment or any part thereof shall be jointly and severally liable to the Town for the full amount so paid or received. 10.3 Violation Examples 1. Examples
of an Improper Procurement (less than $200,000) a. Using department makes a non-contract purchase over the single quote threshold without following proper procurement procedures (e.g.
not obtaining the required competition stated in the Town of Leesburg Procurement Policy) b. Using department authorizes additional goods or services which are different in scope and
quantity in comparison to a previously approved contract. c. Modifying a contract over the single quote threshold in any manner. d. In general, creating the purchase order after
the goods or services have been delivered. e. Unauthorized signing of any type of vendor contract containing contractual terms and conditions. 2. Examples of an Unauthorized Procurement
(more than $200,000) a. Using department makes a non-contract purchase over the formal bid limit without submitting their request through Procurement to complete competitive procurement
requirements. b. Using department authorizes additional goods or services which are different in scope and quantity in comparison to a previously approved contract. c. Modifying
a contract in any manner. d. Unauthorized signing of any type of vendor contract containing contractual terms and conditions. 154 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG, VA – PROCUREMENT POLICIES
AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Revised: January 11, 2022 Page 46 of 60 10.4 Ratification of Violations Ratifying officials may approve a purchase made in violation of procurement policy
upon receipt of a written corrective action plan signed and approved by the using Department Director. 1. The written corrective action plan should include the following: a. A description
of what occurred and what steps have (or will) been taken to preclude future occurrences. b. The name of the official or employee who made the unauthorized commitment, to include
a statement that the official or employee understands what error was made and how to properly procure in the future. c. A statement indicating funds are available for the purchase
(which may be satisfied through department approval of a requisition for the full dollar amount). d. A determination that the price of the goods, services, insurance, or construction
is fair and reasonable based upon appropriate market analysis. e. Confirmation that the goods, services, insurance or construction have been provided and accepted (or cannot be reasonably
returned) by the Town. f. A statement indicating the contractor providing the good or services acted in good faith and that there was no collusion to circumvent proper procurement
procedures. 2. For procurement violations with a value up to and including $30,000, the Chief Procurement Officer is the ratifying official. 3. For procurement violations with a
value greater than $30,000 and up to $50,000, the Chief Procurement Officer and the Director of Finance and Administrative Services must approve the ratification. 4. For procurement
violations with a value greater than $50,000, the Chief Procurement Officer, the Director of Finance and Administrative Services, and the Town Manager must approve the ratification.
155 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG, VA – PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Revised: January 11, 2022 Page 47 of 60 10.5 Escalation for Violations The following escalation
procedures for repeated procurement violations is as follows: 1. First Infraction: Letter to individual user requesting justification as to why policy was not followed and acknowledgment
of the procedural mistake. A copy of the letter is sent to the immediate supervisor and the Department Director. Payment will not be processed until documentation is received. 2.
Second Infraction: Letter to individual user requiring attendance at a one-on-one Procurement User Training with a copy of letter going to immediate supervisor and Department Director.
If individual refuses to attend user training, suspend purchasing authority and notify immediate supervisor and Department Director. 3. Third Infraction: Revoke procurement authority
of individual. Notify immediate supervisor, Department Director, and Director of Human Resources of continuous failure to comply and request that duty be reassigned. A third infraction
within a 12 consecutive month period must be included and considered when an employee’s performance evaluation is prepared and may result in the employee being placed on performance
improvement plan or disciplinary action up to and including termination depending upon the amount and severity of the infraction at the discretion of the Town Manager. 5. Reinstatement:
Reinstatement of procurement authority may be requested by the Department Director thirty (30) days after receipt of the revocation notice provided training is completed. 10.6 Fraud
and Severe Violations 1. Any single fraudulent act committed by an employee will result in an immediate revocation of the individual’s purchasing authority and reported to the employee’s
Department Director, the Director of Finance and Administrative Services, the Director of Human Resources, the Town Manager, and the Leesburg Police Department as it is appropriate.
Fraudulent acts may result in disciplinary action up to and including termination. 2. Given the severity of the procurement violation, any officer or employee who makes an improper
procurement or unauthorized purchase may have their access to the Town’s electronic procurement system suspended or revoked for a single incident. 156 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG, VA
– PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Revised: January 11, 2022 Page 48 of 60 SECTION 11 DEFINITIONS The words defined in this section shall have the meanings set forth
herein wherever they appear in this policies and procedures manual, unless the context in which they are used clearly requires a different meaning, or a different definition is prescribed
for a particular section or provision. 1. Best and Final Offer (BAFO) means the last offer provided by an offeror in response to a Request for Proposal. 2. “Best value,” as predetermined
in the solicitation, means the overall combination of quality, price, and various elements of required services that in total are optimal relative to Town’s needs. 3. “Bid” means a
competitively priced bid to the Town in response to an Invitation for Bid (IFB). This may also mean a submitting price on a public surplus auction solicited by the Town. 4. “Bidder”
means an individual or business who submits a competitively priced bid in response to an Invitation for Bid (IFB), who submitted a quote on an unsealed solicitation, or who submits
a bid on a public surplus auction. 5. “Bid Bond” means an indemnity agreement in which a third party agrees to be financially liable to pay a certain amount of money in the event
a selected bidder fails to accept the contract as bid. 6. “Bid Deposit” means a certified check or cash escrow deposited by a bidder as an agreement in which the bidder agrees to
be financially liable to pay a certain amount of money in the event the bidder fails to accept a contract as bid. 7. “Bid Opening” means the process of publicly opening and reading
bids at the time and place specified in the Invitation for Bid. 8. “Blanket Purchase Agreement” is a procurement instrument under which the Town contracts with a vendor to provide
goods or services for low or erratic volumes under the single quote limit on an as required and over-the counter basis for a 12-month period. 9. “Change Order” means a written authorization
change a contract or purchase order, signed by the Town Manager or designee or Contract Administrator, which establishes a change in scope, the cost, and the extent of any adjustment
in delivery times. 157 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG, VA – PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Revised: January 11, 2022 Page 49 of 60 10. “Competitive Sealed Bidding” means
a formal method of selecting the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. It includes the issuance of a written Invitation for Bid (“IFB”), public notice, a public bid opening, and
evaluation based on the requirements set forth in the IFB. The Procurement Office may establish methods for conducting transactions electronically, an IFB may be issued directly to
vendors electronically, or bids in response thereto may be submitted electronically if specifically authorized in the IFB. 11. “Competitive negotiation” means a formal method of selecting
the offeror (or offerors, in the case of multi-award contracts), which in the opinion of the Town has made the best proposal and provides the best value or whose professional qualifications
and proposed services are deemed most meritorious. It includes the issuance of a written Request for Proposal (“RFP”), public notice, evaluation based on the criteria set forth in the
Request for Proposal and allows negotiation with the top-rated offeror or offerors. Upon implementation of methods prescribed by the Procurement Office for conducting transactions electronically,
an RFP may be issued directly to vendors electronically, or proposals received in response may be submitted electronically if specifically authorized in the RFP. 12. “Construction”
means building, altering, repairing, improving, or demolishing any structure, building, road, drainage, or sanitary facility, and any draining, dredging, excavation, grading, or similar
work upon real property. 13. “Construction management contract” means a contract in which a party is retained by the Town to coordinate and administer contracts for construction services
for the benefit of the Town and may also include, if provided in the contract, the furnishing of construction services to the Town. 14. “Consultant services” means any type of services
required by the Town, but not completed by Town employees, which is in its nature so unique that it should be obtained by negotiation on the basis of demonstrated competence and qualification
for the type of service required and at fair and reasonable compensation, rather than by competitive sealed bidding. 15. “Contract” means any type of agreement for the purchase or
disposal of goods, supplies, services, or construction. It includes contracts of a fixed price, cost, leases, and purchase orders. It also includes supplemental agreements with respect
to any of the foregoing. 16. “Contract Administration” means the management of all facts of a contract to assure the Contractor’s total performance is in accordance with the contractual
commitments and that the obligations of the Contractor under the terms and conditions of the contract are fulfilled. 158 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG, VA – PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
MANUAL Revised: January 11, 2022 Page 50 of 60 17. “Contract Amendment, Contract Modification” means a written alteration or modification in specifications, delivery point, rate
of delivery, period of performance, price, quantity, or other provisions of any contract accomplished by mutual action of the parties to the contract. 18. “Contract, Cost-Plus-A-Percentage
of Cost” means a form of contracts which provides for an agreed to fee or profit at a specified percentage of the contractor’s actual cost of accomplishing the work. 19. “Contract,
Design-Build” means a contract the Town and another party in which the party contracting with the Town agrees to both design and build the structure, roadway or other item specified
in the contract. 20. “Contract, Fixed Price” means a contract that provides a firm unit price or lump sum price to be established at the time of order placement or contract award.
21. “Contract, Fixed Price with Incentive” means a fixed price with an agreed upon target cost and/or profit, a ceiling price, and a profit formula. Below target, the Contractor
and the Town share savings. Above ceiling, the Contractor must assume all costs. 22. “Contract, Fixed-Price with Escalation/De-Escalation” means a fixed price type of contract that
provides for the upward and downward revision of the stated contract price upon the occurrence of certain contingencies (such as fluctuations in material costs and labor rates) specifically
defined in the contract. 23. “Contract Management” means the management of the Town’s contracts and contractrelated activity which may include accounting, administration, auditing,
grants management, law, negotiation, logistics, price-structure compensation, delegation of purchasing authority, program management, termination and other business-related activities.
24. “Contract, Requirements Type” means a form of contact covering long-term requirements used when the total quantity required cannot be definitively fixed but can be stated as an
estimate or within maximum and minimum limits, with deliveries on demand. Such contracts are usually for one year or more in duration. Such contracts may also be referred to as “on-call”,
“annual”, or “indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity” (ID/IQ). 25. “Contract, Time and Materials” means a contract providing for the procurement of supplies or services on the basis
of direct labor hours at specified fixed hourly rates (which include direct and indirect labor, overhead, and profit) and material at cost, or at some bid percentage discount from a
manufacturer’s catalog or list prices. 159 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG, VA – PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Revised: January 11, 2022 Page 51 of 60 26. “Contractor” means
any person or business having a contract with the Town. 27. “Debarment” means an action taken to deny prequalification, disqualify, or debar an individual or firm from consideration
for award of contracts by the Town. A debarment shall not be for a period exceeding three (3) years and during that time, the debarred entity or individual shall be ineligible to bid
or propose on Town solicitations. 28. “Department” means a division that is operating under the Town government organizational structure and has the same meaning as agency or office.
29. “Designee” means a duly authorized representative selected to carry out a duty or role, and act within the limits of the delegator’s authority. 30. “Design-build contract” means
a contract between the Town and another party in which the party contracting with the Town agrees to both design and build the structure, roadway, or other item specified in the contract.
31. “Emergency” means a threat to life or property or an unforeseen situation, which curtails or greatly diminishes an essential service, as determined by the Town Manager or Chief
Procurement or designee(s). 32. “Employee” or “Town employee” means a person employed by and drawing a salary from the Town, including elected officials or appointed members of governing
boards and commissions. 33. “Excess Property” means property which exceeds the requirement of the department or agency to which the property is assigned. 34. “Faith–Based Organization”
means a religious organization that is or applies to be a contractor to provide goods or services for programs funded by the block grant provided pursuant to the Personal Responsibility
and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, P. L. 104- 193. 35. “Firm” means any individual, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity permitted by law to conduct
business in the Commonwealth of Virginia; or any other individual, firm, partnership, corporation, association or other legal entity qualified to perform professional, non-professional,
or consultant services. 36. “Fiscal year” means the 12-month period used for accounting purposes. The Town’s fiscal year is from July 1 through June 30. 37. “Fixed Asset” means a
tangible object (not a component) which has an expected useful life of at least one year and a dollar value in excess of $5,000. 160 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG, VA – PROCUREMENT POLICIES
AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Revised: January 11, 2022 Page 52 of 60 38. “Formal solicitation” means a sealed invitation to bid or sealed request for proposal issued where the estimated
cost greater than or equal to the VPPA formal solicitation limit (or $200,000). 39. “Gift” means any present or promised payment, loan, subscription, advance, deposit of money or
service given, unless consideration of substantially equal or greater value is exchanged. 40. “Goods” means all material, equipment, supplies, printing, including and information
technology hardware and software and intellectual property. 41. “Information Technology” means any goods or services including telecommunications, automated data processing, databases,
the internet, management information systems, software systems, intellectual property, and any related equipment, management and records. 42. “Immediate family” means a spouse, child,
parent, brother, sister, and any other person living in the same household as the employee. 43. “Independent contractor” means a worker over whom the employer has the right to control
or direct the result of the work done, but not the means and methods of the work. 44. “Ineligibility” means an action taken by the Town to refuse permission to participate, or disqualify
from participation, an offeror, bidder, or contractor, in public contracts. 45. “Informality” means a minor defect or variation of a bid or proposal from the exact requirements of
the IFB or the RFP which does not affect the price, quality, quantity, or delivery schedule for the goods, services, or construction being procured. 46. “Informal solicitation” means
an unsealed invitation to bid or unsealed request for proposal issued under the Town’s Small Purchase Policy where the estimated cost is less than the VPPA formal solicitation limit
(or $200,000). 47. “Invitation for Bid” means a document containing or incorporating the scope of work and all contractual terms and conditions, which is used to solicit written bids
for a specific requirement for goods, nonprofessional services, or construction. This type of solicitation is referred to herein as Invitation for Bid (IFB) or competitive sealed bidding.
48. “Job order contracting” means a method of procuring construction by establishing a book of unit prices and then obtaining a contractor to perform work as needed using the prices,
quantities, and specifications in the book as the basis of its pricing. The contractor may be 161 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG, VA – PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Revised:
January 11, 2022 Page 53 of 60 selected through either competitive sealed bidding or competitive negotiation depending on the needs of the Town. A minimum amount of work may be specified
in the contract. 49. “Joint Procurement” means a procurement by a public body with one or more other public bodies, for the purpose of combining requirements for the purchase of like
goods and/or services in order to increase efficiency and/or reduce administrative expenses. All authorized parties are involved in the procurement process and only those parties can
participate in jointly purchasing form the contract. No other public bodies can purchase from the contracts as joint purchasers. 50. “Nonprofessional services” means any service not
specifically identified as a professional service. 51. “Notice of Award” means public written notification, including electronic notice, that a vendor has received an award by the
Town. 52. “Notice of Intent to Award” means public written notice, including electronic notice, prior to award that shows the selection of a vendor for the award of a specific contract
or purchase order. 53. “Offeror” means a person or business who makes an offer in response to a Request for Proposal (RFP). 54. “Payment bond” means a bond required of a contractor
in which a surety guarantees to the Town of the contractor’s obligation to pay all persons supplying labor or materials in the performance of the work provided for in the contract.
55. “Performance bond” means a bond required of a contractor in which a surety guarantees to the Town that the work/services will be performed in accordance with the contract documents.
56. “Purchase Order” means a legal, binding document used by the Town to execute a purchase transaction with a contractor or vendor. When issued to the vendor, it serves as notice
to a vendor that an award has been made and that performance can be initiated under the terms of the contract. 57. “Official responsibility” means administrative or operating authority,
whether intermediate or final, to initiate, approve, disapprove, or otherwise affect a procurement transaction or any resulting claim. 58. “Potential bidder, contractor, or offeror”
means a person who, at the time the Town negotiates and awards or proposes to award a contract, is engaged in the sale or lease of goods, or the sale of services, insurance, or construction,
of the type to be procured 162 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG, VA – PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Revised: January 11, 2022 Page 54 of 60 under such contract, and who at such
time is eligible and qualified in all respects to perform that contract, and who would have been eligible and qualified to submit a bid or proposal had the contract been procured through
competitive sealed bidding or competitive negotiation. 59. “Pre-bid or Pre-Proposal Conference” means a meeting pen to all with interested bidders or offerors prior to submission of
bids or proposals to review, discuss and clarify technical considerations, specifications, or standards relative to the proposed procurement. 60. “Prequalification” means a procedure
to prequalify products or vendors and limit the consideration of bids or proposals to only those products or vendors which have been prequalified. 61. “Procurement” means the process
for obtaining goods or services, including activities from the planning steps and preparation of the processing a purchase requisitions, through receipt and acceptance of delivery and
processing a final invoice for payment. 62. “Procurement official” means a person who is assigned to the Department of Finance and Administrative Services as the procurement official
who shall have the general administrative and supervisory authority for the Town’s procurement process. The Chief Procurement Officer may appointment one or more procurement officials
to assist in carrying out the procurement functions of the Town, subject to the supervision and contract of the Chief Procurement Officer, and/or Finance Director or designee(s).
63. “Procurement transaction” means all functions that pertain to the Town’s procurement from nongovernmental sources, including the obtaining of any goods, services or construction,
including description of requirements, selection and solicitation of sources, preparation and award of contract, and all phases of contract administration. A Procurement transaction
may or may not result in monetary consideration for either party and applies whether the consideration is monetary or nonmonetary and regardless of whether the Town, the contractor,
or a third party is providing the consideration. 64. “Professional services” means work performed by an independent contractor within the scope of practice of accounting, actuarial
services, architecture, dentistry, land surveying, landscape architecture, law, medicine, optometry, pharmacy, or professional engineering. 65. “Proposal” means an offer made from
one party to the Town in response to a Request for Proposal (RFP) and is the basis for negotiations prior to the creation of a contract. 66. “Public body” means any legislative,
executive, or judicial body, including the Town of Leesburg, agency, office, department, authority, post, commission, committee, 163 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG, VA – PROCUREMENT POLICIES
AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Revised: January 11, 2022 Page 55 of 60 institution, board, or political subdivision created by law to exercise some sovereign power or to perform some governmental
duty, and empowered by law to undertake the activities described in this policies and procedures manual. Public body shall include any metropolitan planning organization or planning
district commission which operates exclusively within the Commonwealth of Virginia. 67. “Public contract” or “contract” means an agreement between the Town and a nongovernmental source
that is enforceable in a court of law. 68. “Request for Information” means to request for information on goods or services available in the market which may satisfy the Town’s requirements.
69. “Request for Quotation” means a request for a quote from one or more vendors under and open market procurement where the estimated cost is less than the VPPA formal solicitation
limit (or $200,000). 70. “Request for Proposal” means a document, including those attached or incorporated by reference and addendum, containing or incorporating the Town’s needs and
is utilized for soliciting proposals. This type of solicitation is referred to herein as Request for Proposal (RFP) or competitive negotiation. 71. “Responsible bidder” or “offeror”
means an individual, company, firm, corporation, partnership, or other organization who has the capability in all respects, to perform fully the contract requirements and the moral
and business integrity and reliability which will assure good faith performance, and who has been prequalified, if required. 72. “Responsive bidder” or “offeror” means an individual,
company, firm, corporation, partnership or other organization who has submitted a bid which conforms in all material respects to the Invitation to Bid or Request for Proposal. 73.
“Reverse auctioning” means a procurement method wherein bidders are invited to bid on specified goods or nonprofessional services, excluding construction or professional services, through
real-time electronic bidding, with the award being made to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. During the bidding process, bidder’s prices are revealed and bidders shall have
the opportunity to modify their bid prices for the duration of the time period established for bid opening. 74. “Scope of work” means the requirements describing the contractor’s responsibility
for providing the specified goods and services. 75. “Single purchase” or “Spot purchase” means a one-time purchase made in an open market. If it is under the small purchase threshold,
it will be made in accordance with the Small Purchase Policy. If over the small purchase threshold, it will be made by 164 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG, VA – PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
MANUAL Revised: January 11, 2022 Page 56 of 60 competitive sealed bidding or competitive negotiation or by an exception authorized by law. 76. “Services” means any work performed
by an independent contractor wherein the service rendered does not consist primarily of acquisition of equipment or materials, or the rental of equipment, materials, and supplies.
77. “Sole Source” means a proprietary purchase method where the good or service required is restricted to the manufacturer(s) stipulated or which is only practicably available from
one source. Competition should be used if the proprietary goods or services are not sold exclusively by the manufacturer and are available from multiple suppliers, vendors or distributors.
78. “Specification” means the description of the physical or functional characteristics, or of the nature of good service or construction item. It may include a description of any
requirement for inspecting, testing or preparing a good, service or construction item for delivery. 79. “Statement of Needs” means the general description of the services to be performed
or the goods to be purchased, including quantity, specific tasks, parameters, etc. and is generally used in a Request for Proposal. 80. “Surplus property” shall mean property or supplies
no longer having monetary value and usefulness to the Town. This includes obsolete supplies, scrap materials, nonexpendable supplies and equipment, and equipment that have completed
their usual useful life. 81. “Term contract” means a type of contract in which a source of supply is established for a specified period of time for specified services or supplies;
usually characterized by an estimated or definite minimum quantity, with the possibility of additional requirements beyond the minimum, all at a predetermined unit or lump sum price.
82. “Total value” means the total of all considerations (monetary and nonmonetary) from all parties (Town, contractors and any third parties) for the initial period of the contract
plus any possible renewal periods. If the total value is up to and including $200,000, the Town’s Small Purchase Policy may apply. If the total value is over $200,000, a decision
must be made to use competitive sealed bidding (IFB) or competitive negotiations (RFP), as deemed appropriate. 83. “Town” means the Town of Leesburg, Virginia a council-manager form
of government empowered by the Town Charter to carry out the policies and programs. 165 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG, VA – PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Revised: January
11, 2022 Page 57 of 60 84. “Virginia Public Procurement Act” or “VPPA”” refer to Chapter 43 of Title 2.2, Code of Virginia, which enunciates the public policies and state law pertaining
to governmental procurement from nongovernmental sources. 166 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG, VA – PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Revised: January 11, 2022 Page 58 of
60 APPENDIX A PROCUREMENT PROCEDURES MANUAL NOTE: Town of Leesburg employees can access the standard operating procedures that were referenced throughout this Policies and Procedures
Manual on the Town’s Employee Portal: https://employee.leesburgva.gov/DEPARTMENTS/Finance/Procurement. 167 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG, VA – PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL
Revised: January 11, 2022 Page 59 of 60 APPENDIX B SOLICITATION TEMPLATES NOTE: Town of Leesburg employees can access the solicitation templates that were referenced throughout
this Policies and Procedures Manual on the Town’s Employee Portal: https://employee.leesburgva.gov/DEPARTMENTS/Finance/Procurement. 168 Item g. TOWN OF LEESBURG, VA – PROCUREMENT
POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL Revised: January 11, 2022 Page 60 of 60 APPENDIX C PROCUREMENT CHARTS, CHECKLISTS, AND FORMS NOTE: Town of Leesburg employees can access the procurement
charts, checklists, and forms that were referenced throughout this Policies and Procedures Manual on the Town’s Employee Portal: https://employee.leesburgva.gov/DEPARTMENTS/Finance/Procurement.
169 Item g. Adopted by Town Council Resolution __________, dated January 11, 2022 APPENDIX A-1 DESIGN-BUILD AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES 1.1 Design-Build Contracting
The following procedures include the requirements set forth in Virginia Code § 2.2-4382, as it may be amended from time to time, and are consistent with the procedures adopted by the
Commonwealth Secretary of Administration and the Commonwealth Division of Engineering and Buildings of the Commonwealth Department of General Services. A “design-build contract” is
a fixed-price or not-to-exceed price construction contract between the Town and another party in which the party contracting with the Town agrees to both design and build the structure
or other item specified in the contract. Before utilizing a design-build contracting process for a particular project: a professional engineer or architect shall advise the Town on
the use of design-build for the project; and the Town Council shall adopt a resolution containing its written determination that competitive sealed bidding is not practicable or fiscally
advantageous and documenting the basis for its determination to use a design-build contract. A two-step competitive negotiation process is used to establish a contract, as follows:
1. Selection of Qualified Offerors (Step 1) a. The Town shall conduct a prequalification process as follows to determine which offerors are qualified to receive Requests for Proposal
(RFPs). The Town shall seek prequalification proposals by issuing a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) in the same manner used for issuance of Town Requests for Proposal. The RFQ shall
contain the Town’s facility requirements, building and site criteria, site and survey data (if available), the criteria used to evaluate RFQ responses or other relevant information,
including any unique capabilities or qualifications that will be required of the contractors. All offerors shall have a licensed Class “A” contractor and an architect or engineer registered
in the Commonwealth of Virginia. b. Prequalification proposals will be evaluated by a Town Evaluation Committee (“Committee”) based on the criteria specified in the RFQ. The Committee
shall consist of at least three Town staff, including a licensed design professional, if possible. The Town may deny prequalification only as specified in Virginia Code § 2.2-4317,
but need not select all prequalified offerors to participate in Step 2 of the selection process. The Committee will select between three and five of the highest ranked firms deemed
qualified and suitable for the project, and only those selected will be eligible to participate in Step 2 of the selection process. If less than three firms are deemed qualified and
suitable for the project, then that number shall be eligible to participate in Step 2. c. At least 30 days prior to the date established for the submission of proposals (Step 2),
the Town shall advise in writing each offeror which sought prequalification whether that offeror has been prequalified, and whether the offeror has been selected to participate in Step
2 of the selection process. If an offeror is denied prequalification, such offeror shall be notified in writing, stating the reasons for 170 Item g. Adopted by Town Council Resolution
__________, dated January 11, 2022 such denial of prequalification and the factual basis of such reasons. Prequalified offerors that are not selected for participation shall be so notified
and shall be provided with the reasons for such decision. 2. Selection of Design-Build Contractor (Step 2) a. The Town shall prepare a Request for Proposal (RFP) with the assistance
of a licensed engineer or architect, and shall issue the RFP to the firms selected in Step 1. The RFP shall include the Town Council resolution determining that a designbuild contract
will be utilized, and the criteria for award. b. Offerors shall submit both a Technical Proposal and a separately sealed Cost Proposal to the Procurement Office in the manner specified
in the RFP solicitation. Cost Proposals shall remain sealed until the Technical Proposal Adjustments described in Section 1.1.2.c below are completed. c. Technical Proposals will be
evaluated by a Town Evaluation Committee (“Committee”) based on the criteria specified in the RFP. The Committee shall meet the requirements set forth in Section 1.1.1.b above and,
if no licensed engineer or architect with professional competence appropriate to the project is a member of the Committee, the Committee shall also obtain the advice of such a licensed
professional. The Committee shall identify any adjustments necessary to make each offeror’s Technical Proposal fully compliant with the RFP, and also any design adjustments necessary
to incorporate project improvements and/or additional detailed information identified by the Committee during design development. The Procurement Office shall communicate such desired
adjustments to each offeror. d. Each offeror shall have the opportunity to submit to the Procurement Office a revised Technical Proposal based on such requested adjustments. Each
offeror may also amend its Cost Proposal. e. The Committee will re-evaluate the Technical Proposals and agree to a consensus ranking. Should the Town determine in writing and in
its sole discretion that one offeror is clearly more highly qualified than the others under consideration, a contract may be negotiated and awarded to that offeror. Otherwise, the Procurement
Office shall open the Cost Proposals and provide the cost information to the Committee. f. The Committee will make its recommendation based on its evaluation of all technical and cost
information available. Award shall be made to the offeror who is fully qualified and determined to have provided the best value in response to the RFP. The Town shall notify all offerors
of the offeror selected for award of the contract, or of its intent to award the contract to a particular offeror. When the terms and conditions of multiple awards are so provided in
the RFP, awards may be made to more than one offeror. Cost is a critical component of the selection process. 171 Item g. Adopted by Town Council Resolution __________, dated January
11, 2022 1.2 Construction Management The following procedures include the requirements set forth in Virginia Code § 2.2-4382, as it may be amended from time to time, and are consistent
with the procedures adopted by the Commonwealth Secretary of Administration. A “construction management contract” is a fixed-price or not-to-exceed price construction contract between
the Town and another party in which the party contracting with the Town coordinates and administers contracts for construction services for the benefit of the Town and may also include,
if provided in the contract, the furnishing of construction services to the Town. Construction management contracts allow complex projects to be coordinated by a single contractor,
who may also perform a limited portion of the services. Before utilizing a construction management contracting process for a particular project: a professional engineer or architect
shall advise the Town on the use of construction management for the project; and the Town Council shall adopt a resolution containing its written determination that competitive sealed
bidding is not practicable or fiscally advantageous and documenting the basis for its determination to use a construction management contract. 1. Additional Threshold Requirements.
The Town may utilize construction management contracts where the construction value is in excess of the cost threshold established in procedures adopted by the Commonwealth Secretary
of Administration (the “Cost Threshold”).1 Where the construction value is expected to be less than the Cost Threshold, the Town may utilize a construction management contract only
if the project is a complex project and the use of construction management has been approved by the Town Council. A construction management contract may be used only if entered into
no later than the completion of the schematic phase of design, except where prohibited by authorization of funding restrictions. 2. Two-Step Competitive Negotiation Process. A two-step
competitive negotiation process is used to establish a contract, as follows: 1. Selection of Qualified Offerors (Step 1) a. The Town shall conduct a prequalification process as follows
to determine which offerors are qualified to receive Request for Proposals (RFPs). The Town shall seek prequalification proposals by issuing a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) in the
same manner used for issuance of Town Requests for Proposal. The RFQ shall contain the Town’s facility requirements, building and site criteria, site and survey data (if available),
the criteria used to evaluate RFQ responses or other relevant information, including any unique capabilities or qualifications that will be required of the contractors. All offerors
shall have a licensed Class “A” contractor registered in the Commonwealth of Virginia as part of the project team. 1 Based
on Construction Management (CM) Procedures as Adopted by the Secretary of Administration effective January 1, 2020, the construction value must exceed $26,000,000. 172 Item g. Adopted
by Town Council Resolution __________, dated January 11, 2022 Public notice of the RFQ shall be posted ono the Commonwealth’s electronic procurement website (eVA) at least 30 days prior
to the date set for receipt of qualification proposals. b. Prior construction management or design-build experience shall not be required as a prerequisite for award of a contract,
but the Town may consider the experience of each contractor on comparable projects, and the RFQ may request documentation sufficient to evaluate whether the offeror has constructed,
by any method of project delivery, at least three comparable projects within the previous ten years. c. Prequalification proposals will be evaluated by aTown Evaluation Committee (“Committee”).
The Committee shall consist of at least three Town staff, including a licensed design professional, if possible. The Town may deny prequalification only as specified in Virginia Code
§ 2.2-4317, but need not select all prequalified offerors to participate in Step 2 of the selection process. The Committee will select between three and five of the highest ranked firms
deemed qualified and suitable for the project, and only those selected will be eligible to participate in Step 2 of the selection process. If less than three firms are deemed qualified
and suitable for the project, then that number shall be eligible to participate in Step 2. d. At least 30 days prior to the date established for the submission of proposals (Step 2),
the Town shall advise in writing each offeror which sought prequalification whether that offeror has been prequalified, and whether the offeror has been selected to participate in Step
2 of the selection process. If an offeror is denied prequalification, such offeror shall be notified in writing, stating the reasons for such denial of prequalification and the factual
basis of such reasons. Prequalified offerors that are not selected for participation shall be so notified and shall be provided with the reasons for such decision. 2. Selection of
Construction Manager (Step 2) a. The Town shall prepare a Request for Proposal (RFP) with the assistance of a licensed engineer or architect, and shall issue the RFP to the firms selected
in Step 1. The RFP shall include the Town Council resolution determining that a construction management contract will be utilized, and the criteria for award. b. Offerors shall submit
a proposal to the Procurement Office in the manner specified in the RFP solicitation. c. Proposals will be evaluated and ranked by an Evaluation Committee (“Committee”) based on the
criteria specified in the RFP. The Committee shall meet the requirements set forth in Section 1.2.2.1.b above and, if no licensed engineer or architect with professional competence
appropriate to the project is a member of the Committee, the Committee shall also obtain the advice of such a licensed professional. After evaluation and 173 Item g. Adopted by Town
Council Resolution __________, dated January 11, 2022 ranking of the proposals, the Committee shall conduct negotiations with two or more offerors submitting the highest ranked proposals,
provided however, that should the Town determine, in writing and in its sole discretion, that only one offeror is fully qualified, or one offeror is clearly more highly qualified than
the others under consideration, a contract may be negotiated and awarded to that offeror. d. Award shall be made to the offeror who is fully qualified and determined to have provided
the best value in response to the RFP. The Town shall notify all offerors of the offeror selected for award of the contract, or of its intent to award the contract to a particular offeror.
When the terms and conditions of multiple awards are so provided in the RFP, awards may be made to more than one offeror. Cost is a critical component of the award process. 3. Required
Contract Terms and Conditions a. Any construction management contract shall include the following requirements: (1) not more than 10% of the construction work (measured by cost of
the work) will be performed by the Construction Manager with its own forces and (2) that the remaining 90% of the construction work will be performed by subcontractors of the Construction
Manager which the Construction Manager shall procure by publicly advertised, competitive sealed bidding to the maximum extent practicable. The Construction Manager shall provide documentation
detailing the reasons that any subcontracted work is not procured by publicly advertised competitive sealed bidding. b. The guaranteed maximum price or not-to-exceed price shall be
established at the completion of working drawings, unless a waiver of this requirement has been granted by the Chief Procurement Officer. 174 Item g. PRESENTED: November 23, 2021
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-187 ADOPTED: November 23, 2021 AMENDED: _________________ A RESOLUTION : SETTING THE CALENDAR YEAR 2022 TOWN COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULE AND AUTHORITY TO RESET THE
DAY OR DAYS TO WHICH A REGULAR MEETING SHALL BE CONTINUED IN THE EVENT OF INCLEMENT WEATHER WHEREAS, the Town Council traditionally meets in formal session on the second and fourth
Tuesday in each month, and sits as a “committee of the whole” on the Monday preceding the regular council meeting in the Council Chamber, 25 West Market Street; and WHEREAS, the Town
Council traditionally cancels a set of meetings in August to provide for summer break; and WHEREAS, the Town Council traditionally cancels the second meetings of December to observe
the holiday season; and WHEREAS, the Town of Leesburg will observe Presidents Day on Monday, February 21, 2022, and Columbus Day on Monday, October 10, 2022; which are Federal Government
holidays that will conflict with the work sessions; and WHEREAS, Town Council at its November 23, 2021 meeting moved the November 21 and 22, 2022 regular set of meetings to November
28 and 29, 2022 to avoid holding meetings during the Thanksgiving holiday week; and WHEREAS, Town Council at its January 10, 2022 Work Session moved the first set of meetings in November
to November 14 and 15, 2022 to avoid a conflict with election day; and WHEREAS, Virginia Code Section § 15.2-1416 allows a governing body the authority to reset the day or days to
which a regular meeting shall be continued if the Mayor declares 175 Item h. A RESOLUTION: SETTING THE CALENDAR YEAR 2022 TOWN COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULE AND AUTHORITY TO RESET THE
DAY OR DAYS TO WHICH A REGULAR MEETING SHALL BE CONTINUED IN THE EVENT OF INCLEMENT WEATHER -2- 07/30/2021 that weather or other conditions are such that it is hazardous for members
to attend the regular meeting. THEREFORE, RESOLVED, by Council of the Town of Leesburg in Virginia that: (1) The Town Council shall meet in formal session at 7:00 p.m., on the second
and fourth Tuesday in each month and shall sit as a “committee of the whole” convening at 7:00 p.m., on Monday preceding the regular council meeting in the Council Chamber, 25 West
Market Street or at such time and place as the Council may determine from time to time with the exception of the work session meetings of Monday, February 21, 2022 to observe Presidents
Day, October 10, 2022 to observe Columbus Day, November 7 and 8, 2022 to November 14 and 15, 2022 to avoid conflict with Election Day and November 21 and November 22, 2022 to November
28 and 29, 2022 to avoid conflict with the Thanksgiving holiday week. (2) Regular meetings shall be continued to the next regularly-scheduled meeting if the Mayor needs to declare
that weather or other conditions are such that it is hazardous for members to attend the regular meeting. Such finding shall be communicated to the members and the press as promptly
as possible. All hearings and other matters previously advertised shall be conducted at the continued meeting and no further advertisement shall be required. PASSED this 11th23rd day
of NovemberJanuary, 20221. ______________________________ Kelly Burk, Mayor Town of Leesburg ATTEST: ______________________________ Clerk of Council 176 Item h. Date of
Council Meeting: January 11, 2022 TOWN OF LEESBURG TOWN COUNCIL MEETING REVISED MEMO Subject: TLTA-2019-0001 Virginia Village Town Plan Amendment TLZM-2019-0001, Virginia Village Rezoning
TLSE-2020-0004 Virginia Village Floodplain Alteration Special Exception Staff Contact: Brian Boucher, Deputy Director, Department of Planning and Zoning Council Action Requested:
Approval of the Town Plan Amendment, Rezoning and Special Exception applications submitted by Keane Enterprises for a mixed-use development comprised of 643 residential dwelling units
and 165,800 square feet of commercial uses. Note that an updated Proffer Statement dated December 21, 2021 January 7 10, 2022 is attached. The revisions to the proffers that were attached
to the December 13, 2021 Work Session Staff Report include the following: 1. A revision to Proffer #9.a (General responsibilities of the Property Owners Association) to add a statement
that garage spaces in townhomes and stacked townhouses must be used for the parking of vehicles. 2. A revision to Proffer #10 Affordable Dwelling Units to indicate that 33 35 Affordable
Dwelling Units (ADUs) will be built in the project even if fewer than 643 dwelling units are built on the property. This is an increase of two units over the previous 33 ADUs proffered.
3. A revision to Proffer #20 Parking to add a statement that “smart parking” technologies will be installed in each garage for public parking spaces to direct drivers to available
spaces. 4. A revision to Proffer #5 Development Phasing to add a statement that “nothing contained in this proffer or depicted on the Phasing Plan shall preclude the Owner’s ability
to develop Building B at an earlier time.” Building B is otherwise listed as Phase 2C. 5. A revision to Proffer #20 Parking to add a statement that ‘The Owner shall install a minimum
of 20 electric vehicle (“EV”) charging stations which shall be installed proportionally in the parking garages for Buildings A. B and E.’ Further, the initial purchasers of townhouses
and stacked townhouses shall be offered the option to install an EV charging station in their respective garages. If initial purchasers do not exercise this option, “all electrical
panels must be sized to accommodate future installations in order to allow subsequent purchasers to more readily install an EV charging station.” REVISED 177 Item a. Revised TLTA-2019-0001,
TLZM-2019-0001 and TLSE-2020-0004 Virginia Village January 11, 2022 Page 2 6. A revision to Proffer #10 Parking to add a statement that the parking rate for one-bedroom units shall
be 1.25 spaces per unit. In effect, this would add 95 parking spaces for exclusive multifamily residential use, an increase from 655 to 750 total spaces. This alters the Modification
#47 request from 1.0 spaces per one-bedroom unit to 1.25 spaces per unit, and would provide 475 total spaces for those units instead of the previously requested 380 spaces. A review
of the nonresidential parking indicates this would decrease the 740 commercial spaces to 645 spaces. However, staff notes that even with this reduction, the nonresidential parking provided
is adequate to meet the Zoning Ordinance standards, even if 50,000 s.f. of the retail uses are devoted to restaurant use, which is a high parking generator. Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the following applications: 1. TLTA-2019-0001 Virginia Village Town Plan Amendment to a. Add 2.67 acres of land designated as “Downtown” on the Planned
Land Use Policy Map to “Residential” on the Crescent District Land Use Policy Map; and b. Revise the Crescent District land Use Policy Map to convert 2.17 acres shown as “Mixed Use”
to “Residential”; and c. Revise the Crescent District Building Height Policy Map to add the subject property as “Additional Stories by Rezoning”; and d. Revise the Crescent District
Future Streets Policy Map to add the subject property. (See Resolution, Attachment 1) 2. TLZM-2019-0001Virginia Village rezoning application to rezone 18.48 acres from R-22, Multi-Family
Residential, CD-MUR, Crescent District-Mixed-Use Residential, CD-CC, Crescent District-Commercial Corridor and Gateway District (Overlay) to CD-RH, Crescent District Residential High
Density and CD-CC, Crescent District Corridor-Commercial, subject to a Concept Plan (Attachment 5) and Proffers dated December 21, 2021 (Attachment 4) and 32 modifications. (See Ordinance,
Attachment 2). 3. TLSE-2020-0004 Special Exception application to permit the alteration of the floodplain along a portion of the Town Branch waterway to facilitate construction of
a pedestrian bridge across that waterway. (See Resolution, Attachment 3) Commission Recommendation: The Planning Commission recommended approval of the Town Plan Amendment and the
Special Exception Application, but recommended denial of the Rezoning Application on November 4, 2021. Commissioners had questions about traffic impact, fiscal impact, phasing, parking,
character of the development, and a desire for more commercial and less residential in the project. The Planning Commission motion in effect also recommends denial of three of the
32 modifications requested by the applicant: #32 about increasing density, #35 about reducing the percentage of nonresidential square footage, and #47 about reducing multifamily parking.
Fiscal Impact: A fiscal impact analysis dated September 9, 2021 prepared by RCLCO, was submitted in support of the rezoning application (see November 23, 2021 Staff Report, Attachment
178 Item a. Revised TLTA-2019-0001, TLZM-2019-0001 and TLSE-2020-0004 Virginia Village January 11, 2022 Page 3 5). Town staff reviewed the FIA using the new fiscal impact model developed
at Council’s direction to accurately capture costs and revenues of new development to the Town. The fiscal impact model measures direct costs and revenues based on the proposed development.
It does not assess overall economic impact. Staff have concluded the development would generate approximately $734,000 per year to the Town, or a $525,724 per year increase to the Town
over current revenues from the site at full buildout. The residential portion of the project at buildout generates $147,000 net positive fiscal impact to the Town and the commercial
portion generates the balance of the $734,000 figure. The project will have a positive net fiscal impact to the Town in each of the proposed phases of the project. Work Plan Impact:
Define how this project impacts the workload. The execution of this lease will have no impact. Executive Summary: The Town Council held a work session on December 13, 2021 on the
Town Plan Amendment, Rezoning, and Special Exception applications. The Town Council asked questions about the applications directed to staff and the applicant. Council persons expressed
concerns or asked questions about the impact of traffic on and from surrounding areas, particularly on the Catoctin Circle/South King Street intersection, the economic impact on the
Town, the reduction in the 40% commercial/60% residential square footage standard, the scale and appearance of the buildings, phasing of commercial uses and residential amenities, the
impact of reduced residential parking on the surrounding neighborhoods, and the Farmers Market. The Town Council scheduled these applications for possible action at the January 11,
2022 meeting. Background: Town Council members asked questions concerning the project, including the following arranged by topic. Parking 1. Where will parking for the Farmers Market
be located? Answer: Applicant Brian Cullen stated that they would park primarily in the parking garages in Buildings A and E. 2. How will applicant prevent apartment renters with
more than one car from parking offsite in adjacent commercial areas or residential neighborhoods? That is, how will the parking be managed? Answer: The four proposed parking structures
have 1,336 spaces between them with 60 additional on-street spaces in the mixed-use area. Of these 1,396 spaces, 741 spaces can be used for commercial uses with 655 spaces dedicated
to the renters. Parking on the first floor of the garages shall be allocated to commercial users. For residential parking, each renter will register their vehicle and will have an
assigned space in a gated part of the garage (one of the required 655 spaces). If the renter has an additional vehicle, during business hours they may receive a sticker for a “flex
space” that will allow them to park the extra vehicle in the garage for specific hours. The applicant stated that the ability to alter the type of commercial (not office) uses to
adapt to the market will create situations where the parking structures may have excess commercial 179 Item a. Revised TLTA-2019-0001, TLZM-2019-0001 and TLSE-2020-0004 Virginia Village
January 11, 2022 Page 4 parking. In “Low Demand” commercial scenarios with fewer restaurant uses there will be “Flex Spaces” which are spaces in the upper floor of the garages that
are not needed for commercial users. These can be used for residential users that have an extra vehicle, who can be assigned an extra space in the garage. Even in “High Demand” scenarios
with more eating establishments applicant stated there will be additional flex spaces available. Taken together, these measures are intended to prevent residents from parking outside
of the development. Note that garage parking spaces will be the standard 9’ x 18’ spaces required in surface parking lots. If a person parks a vehicle in the garage but does not register
it, applicant stated that the monitoring of the spaces should identify these and will result in enforcement. 3. Where will short-term delivery vehicles park? Answer: The applicant
stated there are on-street spaces but alternatives like striped, dedicated spaces may be needed in the future. 4. What is the intent of Proffer #20 Parking? Answer: This proffer states
in part that “The Owner may provide more or less parking than required by the Zoning Ordinance for the use(s) established in any building without the need for an amendment to this Application,
provided that if the Owner reduces the parking supply pursuant to an approved parking reduction study and/or shared parking agreement, the rates will be in conformance therewith as
approved by the Town.” The purpose of this proffer is to allow the applicant to take advantage of any amendments to the parking requirements that could result in a reduction of the
required parking amounts without having to amend the totals shown on the approved Concept Plan. For example, the parking standard for office used by applicant is one space for every
400 s.f. If the Town amended the parking requirement for office use to be one space for every 450 s.f., applicant could reduce the spaces provided for office use to accord with this
new standard without going through a rezoning amendment to achieve this. Applicant will still have to meet the minimum parking requirements for the uses they have at any particular
time. 5. Do the proffers specify that the garage spaces for the townhouses and stacked townhouses can only be used for vehicle parking? Answer: They did not at the time of the December
13th meeting, but since the meeting the applicant has revised Proffer #9.a (General responsibilities of the Property Owners Association) to add a statement that garage spaces in townhomes
and stacked townhouses must be used for the parking of vehicles. 6. Where can large trucks park that do not fit in the parking deck? Answer: There are 60 on-street spaces in the mixed-use
area to accommodate vehicles that might be too large to park in the garages. 7. What was the standard for parking for Church and Market? Answer: Church and Market uses the parking
standards available in the B-1, Community (Downtown) Business District, which require 1.0 space for a 1-Bedroom unit and 1.5 180 Item a. Revised TLTA-2019-0001, TLZM-2019-0001 and TLSE-2020-0004
Virginia Village January 11, 2022 Page 5 spaces for a 2-Bedroom unit. In all, the 116 multifamily units require 134 parking spaces. This is the parking standard applicant is requesting
to use in Modification #47. The commercial parking requirements in the B-1 District are the same as those used in the Crescent Design District. Like in the case of Virginia Village,
the Church & Market project also used Zoning Ordinance Sec. 11.4.5.A Shared parking/Mixed Use to reduce its commercial parking requirement based on “time of day” factors. In all, that
project proposes a total of 169 spaces are proposed in the internal garage with 11 on-street or surface parking spaces. Traffic 1. Why did the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) not have
a broader study reach? Answer: The Design and Construction Standards Manual states that an applicant must only study intersections where they have a 15% or more traffic impact on
the amount of traffic going through that intersection, so intersections farther away where impact is less are not required to be studied. In order to change these standards and require
more from a TIA, the DCSM would have to be amended. 2. Why did the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) use a 1% background traffic percentage? Answer: The 1% background factor is used in
the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments (COG) traffic model. The TIA did take into account the Crescent Parke and King Street Station developments at the Town’s request.
As a result, the background traffic figure used was above the required 1% and is approximately 1.5%. 3. In the Phasing Plan, why is commercial Building C built at the same time as
the Ours Overlook amenity is constructed and not earlier in the project phasing? Answer: The applicant stated that for practical reasons of construction, staging and financing, the
Ours Overlook and Building C must be built at the same time after Building E is built. Based on grading and the need to build retaining walls for Ours Overlook and Building C, and
the desire to prevent people from coming through a construction site for Building E if Ours Overlook and Buildings C and D were built first, applicant stated it is not practical to
build Building C or Ours Overlook earlier than proposed. 4. Will the number of Affordable Dwelling Units (33) decrease if fewer than 643 total dwelling units are built on the property?
Answer: At the time of the meeting, the answer was yes. However, the applicant has committed to provide a total of 33 ADUs even if fewer than 643 units are constructed as stated in
a revised Proffer #10 Affordable Dwelling Units in the revised Proffer Statement dated December 21, 2021 (Attachment 4). The requirement for 5% ADUs in this case is a standard in the
Zoning Ordinance. 5. Are the current building designs what will be constructed or can there be significant changes to what has been shown? Answer: The architecture has been committed
to through this rezoning process. Any changes must accord with the Crescent District standards and be approved by the Zoning 181 Item a. Revised TLTA-2019-0001, TLZM-2019-0001 and TLSE-2020-0004
Virginia Village January 11, 2022 Page 6 Administrator as substantially conforming to the approved plans. Note that any Zoning Administrator interpretation of a proffer is appealable
to the Town Council. 6. When in the floodplain alteration process is the water surface rise mitigation determined? Answer: William Ackman the Plan Review Director stated that before
any construction is allowed, a study will determine what the flood rise will be and the construction will be subject to an as-built to verify that what has been constructed meets the
rise analysis exactly. If there is any deviation, they will not receive occupancy and must do whatever site improvements are necessary to meet the standard identified in the study.
Economic 1. What kind of commercial space are people asking for? Answer: Economic Development Director Russell Seymour said COVID has had an enormous negative impact on retail. People
are looking for smaller office and office/flex space, anywhere from small spaces to over 10-20,000 s.f. or more when available. People are typically looking for Class A office space.
The Town has Class A space with 5,000 s.f. or more in only two properties in Leesburg at present time. Co-working spaces are appearing in Town, mostly because of the HUB Zone. Businesses
within the HUB Zone tend to be government-contract firms. Commercial space was declining before the COVID pandemic due in part to increased online shopping, or the “amazoning” of retail
shopping. 2. What is biggest gap in commercial space now? Answer: There is an immediate need for non-retail commercial space. Vacancies are occurring mostly in the retail space market.
Note that staff considers restaurant space as retail space. 3. Where do you see employment trends going, as far as commercial space is concerned? Answer: Though it is difficult to
predict with certainty, the State and regional groups are looking at is R&D, government contracting and technology firms. These three areas make up about 75% of the projects they are
seeing. 4. What is the net revenue of the development for the Town? Answer: Cole Fazenbaker, Management Analyst for the Finance Department, stated that using the updated Town model
the net is, conservatively, $525,000 at full buildout based on every single revenue line the Town gets, including meals tax, real estate, personal property tax and sales tax. 5. What
is the justification for Modification #35 which seeks to decrease the ordinance standard of 40% nonresidential square footage/60% residential square footage to 21% nonresidential square
footage/79% residential square footage in the development? 182 Item a. Revised TLTA-2019-0001, TLZM-2019-0001 and TLSE-2020-0004 Virginia Village January 11, 2022 Page 7 Answer: The
proffered Phasing Plan (Proffer #5) will ensure that 52% of the proposed commercial square footage will be in place before the last occupancy permit for residential use is issued. This
is a higher percentage of the total commercial space than in any other mixed-use project in Leesburg. Also, staff believes the 40/60 mix is not realistic under current market conditions
with more people working from home and a dip in retail space due to online shopping. 6. Who is the target market for the apartment mix that is proposed? Answer: The applicant stated
that the one-bedroom and studio apartments are intended for young, working professionals and service workers in the Town. Applicant stated there is a lack of one-bedroom and studio
units that are walkable to the downtown area. In addition to the information above, Economic Development Director Russell Seymour submitted the following comments concerning the project:
There are 2 areas that remain a concern when looking to address the Town’s Economic Development Mission. These are the reduction of the required amount of commercial from 40% to 21%
and the overall timing (phasing) of the commercial development. 1. The Town of Leesburg has very little commercial space remaining for development. This, coupled with the significant
increase in residential development and recent rezonings that have converted commercial space to residential, has made it difficult to attract higher-paying jobs that match the employment
needs of residents. The current ordinance requires that any rezoning within the Crescent Design District (CDD) that contains residential uses shall include a minimum of forty percent
(40%) of the proposed building Gross Floor Area (GFA) area of the development to be devoted to nonresidential uses. The current proposal includes only a 21% commercial figure. As
this project is to set the standard for others, maintaining the required amount of commercial space should be considered. 2. The proposed phasing plan for this project shows that
by the completion of Phase 2A, 88.8% of all planned residential will be completed, compared to only 30.4% of the planned commercial. By the completion of Phase 2B, 100% of all residential
will be complete, with 59.1% of the commercial. According to information provided by staff, there currently is a total of 134,000sf of commercial space located in VA Village.
At the completion, and possibly occupation, of all residential buildout, commercial space will have been reduced to 86,500sf, the majority of which will be retail. The remaining commercial
space, specifically Building B, is not due to start until the 4th and final phase of the project. It is my understanding that some concern has been expressed over the required 60%/40%
split between residential and commercial, given the age of the ordinance (2013). I certainly understand this, considering all of the changes that have occurred even within the past
2 years. I am not certain that any plan or ordinance is not somewhat dated and therefore, of the two issues noted above, I believe that the residential to commercial ratio is less
of an 183 Item a. Revised TLTA-2019-0001, TLZM-2019-0001 and TLSE-2020-0004 Virginia Village January 11, 2022 Page 8 issue. If the timing of the proposed commercial space could be
accelerated, the overall value of this project to the Town would be increased. In looking at the VA Village proposal, the project does have significant merit. With the
limited amount of vacant land remaining, redevelopment is going to be the predominate next phase in the Town’s growth. Catoctin Circle is a logical area to start, given its age, location
and current mix of uses. For VA Village, to best accomplish the Town’s goals related to economic development, the construction of commercial, specifically non-retail space, in an earlier
phase would be ideal. EDC Recommendation On January 5, 2022 the Economic Development Commission (EDC) made a recommendation of support to for the Virginia Village rezoning application
(see Attachment 6) by a vote of 5-1-1 subject to the following: “The EDC supports the Virginia Village Redevelopment Project with a strong recommendation that Phase 2C be moved to
the Phase 2A position using whatever methods are available to Council including incentives.” Phase 2C is the last of the five phases in the proffers. It consists of commercial Building
B comprised of 67,800 s.f. of office and retail space with an internal parking garage. Phase 2A consists of mixed-use Building A containing up to 25,000 s.f., of commercial uses and
266 multifamily units (the largest number in any building), and Building F containing 1,500 s.f. of commercial uses. Miscellaneous 1. Will public transportation be allowed to enter
into the development? Answer: Yes, school buses and other public buses will be allowed inside the development similar to the Village at Leesburg. One bus stop is proffered for Virginia
Village. 2. How far are the buildings setback from Catoctin Circle? Answer: The Crescent Design District allows buildings as tall as 70 feet to be located along Catoctin Circle. With
the streetscape requirements that include a nine-foot pedestrian zone and an eight-foot tree zone, the closest any point of Building A will be to Catoctin Circle is 22 feet, with this
increasing to 48 feet near the Entry Park. Building D is a minimum of 22 feet from Catoctin Circle at its closest point. 3. From a comparison standpoint, how tall are the proposed
buildings compared to the Church and Market Building, and the King Street Station buildings? Answer: Buildings A and B are approximately 62 feet at the tallest point. Church and Market
is 65 feet at its highest point, King Street Station buildings are about 56 feet tall, and the County Building is approximately 72 feet tall with an ornamental element reaching up to
88 feet at the highest point. 184 Item a. Revised TLTA-2019-0001, TLZM-2019-0001 and TLSE-2020-0004 Virginia Village January 11, 2022 Page 9 4. Why is there no raised table at the
Fairfax Street entrance onto Catoctin Circle similar to the table at High Street? Answer: Applicant stated it was because of the traffic speed. Staff notes there is no light or pedestrian
signal there that supplements the table at High Street. Correction Note: Staff erroneously stated during the meeting that there is no left turn out of Fairfax Street onto Catoctin
Circle. In fact, a left turn at that location is shown and included in the traffic study. 5. What are the amenities at Church and Market by comparison? Answer: The Church and Market
project received modification approval to reduce required recreation area and amenities from 29,000 square feet of active recreation area and 15% open space to 2,600 s.f. of active
recreation, a 1,500 s.f. clubhouse in the building and a 4,910 s.f. of common terrace area. The reasoning was based on the site’s central location in the downtown area. 6. What is
the concern of not meeting LEED certification? Answer: From a staff standpoint the proposal falls short of the desired LEED certification in the standard, but there are improvements
to the site that soften staff’s overall concern in this area. For example, Proffer #32 Energy Conservation mandates an improved home energy rating of 90. In addition, water quality
measures will be required for the entire site whereas the water exiting the site today is not treated for quality purposes. Finally, trees will be added throughout the property where
few currently exist. Taken together, this is a significant improvement over the site in its current state. Applicant noted that walkability and water conservation are other things that
count toward a LEED certification that they provide. 7. With the requested reduction in the 40% commercial square footage standard, will the site have more or less commercial as proposed?
Answer: The site currently has 134,000 s.f. of commercial uses. The project proposes 165,800 square feet of commercial uses at full buildout, which is more than currently exists on
the site. Proposed Legislation: RESOLUTION Adopting Town Plan Amendment TLTA-2019-0001 to Amend the Planned Land Use Policy Map, the Crescent District Land Use Policy Map, the Crescent
District Building Height Policy Map, and the Crescent District Future Streets Policy Map Draft Motions: 1. Approval I move to approve the proposed resolution for Town Plan Amendment
application TLTA-20190001 Virginia Village, on the basis that the amendment meets the approval criteria of TLZO 185 Item a. Revised TLTA-2019-0001, TLZM-2019-0001 and TLSE-2020-0004
Virginia Village January 11, 2022 Page 10 Section 3.3.16 and will serve the public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good planning practice based on the findings as provided
in the November 23, 2021, Town Council Staff report. OR 2. Denial I move to deny the proposed resolution for Town Plan Amendment application TLTA-2019-0001 Virginia Village, based
on the following findings_______. OR 3. Alternate Motion I move an alternate motion. ORDINANCE Approving TLZM-2019-0001, Virginia Village, to Rezone 18.48 Acres from R-22, Multifamily
Residential, CD-MUR, Crescent District – Mixed-Use Residential, CD-CC, Crescent District – Commercial Corridor, and Gateway District (Overlay), to CD-RH, Crescent District – Residential
High Density and CD-CC, Crescent District – Corridor Commercial District Draft Motions: 1. Approval I move to approve the ordinance for rezoning application TLZM-2019-0001 subject
to the Concept Development Plan dated October 27, 2019 and Proffers dated January 7 10, 2022, on the basis that the approval criteria of Zoning Ordinance Section 3.3.15 have been satisfied
and that the proposal would serve the public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice. OR 2. Denial I move to deny the ordinance for rezoning application
TLZM-2019-0001 Virginia Village on the basis that the approval criteria of Zoning Ordinance Section 3.3.15 have not been satisfied due to the following reasons _____________________________________.
OR 3. Alternate Motion I move an alternate motion. RESOLUTION 186 Item a. Revised TLTA-2019-0001, TLZM-2019-0001 and TLSE-2020-0004 Virginia Village January 11, 2022 Page 11 Approving
Special Exception TLSE-2020-0004, Virginia Village Floodplain Alteration to Allow the Alteration of the Floodplain Boundaries in the Northeast Quadrant of the Property Along Town Branch
Draft Motions: 1. Approval I move to approve the proposed resolution for special exception application TLSE-2020-0004, Virginia Village Floodplain Alteration, subject to the conditions
of approval as enumerated in the November 23, 2021 Town Council Staff report on the basis that the Approval Criteria of Zoning Ordinance Section 3.4.12 have been satisfied and that
the proposal would serve the public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice. OR 2. Denial I move to deny the proposed resolution for special exception application
TLSE-2020-0004 Virginia Village Floodplain Alteration, based on the following findings_______. OR 3. Alternate Motion I move an alternate motion Attachments: 1. TLTA-2019-0001 Draft
Resolution 2. TLZM-2019-0001 Draft Ordinance 3. TLSE-2020-0004 Draft Resolution 4. Proffer Statement dated January 7 10, 2022 5. Concept Plan dated October 27, 2021 6. Economic Development
Recommendation Rev. 05/27/2021 187 Item a. PRESENTED: January 11, 2022 RESOLUTION NO. 2022- ADOPTED: _______________ A RESOLUTION : ADOPTING TOWN PLAN AMENDMENT TLTA-2019-0001 TO
AMEND THE PLANNED LAND USE POLICY MAP, THE CRESCENT DISTRICT LAND USE POLICY MAP, THE CRESCENT DISTRICT BUILDING HEIGHT POLICY MAP, AND THE CRESCENT DISTRICT FUTURE STREETS POLICY MAP
WHEREAS, Keane Enterprises has requested that the Town Plan Planned Use policy Map and the Crescent District Land Use Policy Map be amended to convert 2.67 acres of land designated
as “Downtown” on the Planned Land Use policy Map to “Residential” on the Crescent District Land Use Policy Map; and WHEREAS, Applicant has further requested to amend the Crescent
District Land Use Policy Map to convert 2.17 acres shown as “Mixed Use” to “Residential”; and WHEREAS, Applicant further requested that the Crescent District Building Height Policy
Map be revised to add the subject properties as “Additional Stories by Rezoning”; and WHEREAS, Applicant further requested that the Crescent District Future Streets Policy Map be
revised to add the subject property; and WHEREAS, a duly advertised Planning Commission public hearing was held on August 5, 2021, and at its meeting on November 4, 2021, the Planning
Commission recommended approval of the proposed Town Plan Amendment to the Town Council; and WHEREAS, The Town Council held a duly advertised public hearing on this application on
November 23, 2021; and WHEREAS, Staff recommends approval; and WHEREAS, the Council has concluded that the approval of the amendment would be in the public interest and
in accordance with sound planning and zoning principles; and WHEREAS, Town Council has determined that the approval criteria of Zoning Ordinance Section 3.16.12 have been
satisfied; and 188 Item a. A RESOLUTION: ADOPTING TOWN PLAN AMENDMENT TLTA-2019-0001 TO AMEND THE PLANNED LAND USE POLICY MAP, THE CRESCENT DISTRICT LAND USE POLICY MAP, THE CRESCENT
DISTRICT BUILDING HEIGHT POLICY MAP, AND THE CRESCENT DISTRICT FUTURE STREETS POLICY MAP -2- WHEREAS, the Town Council has determined that approval of the amendment
proposed by TLTA-2019-0001 provides a more compatible land use pattern and provides transportation links that promote the health, safety, convenience, prosperity, and general welfare
of Leesburg. THEREFORE, RESOLVED, by the Council of the Town of Leesburg in Virginia that TLTA-2019-0001 Virginia Village amending the Town Plan is hereby approved as follows:
1. The Planned Land Use Policy Map is amended to remove 2.67 acres of land from “Downtown” and to re-designate it as “Residential” on the Crescent District Land Use policy Map; and
2. The Crescent District Land Use Policy Map is amended to re-designate 2.17 acres from the “Mixed Use” category to the “Residential” category; and 3. The Crescent District Building
Height Policy Map is amended to add and designate the subject property as “Additional Stories by Rezoning”; and 4. The Crescent District Future Streets Policy Map is amended to add
the subject property. PASSED this 11th day of January, 2022. ______________________________ Kelly Burk, Mayor Town of Leesburg ATTEST: ______________________________ Clerk of
Council 189 Item a. PRESENTED: January 11, 2022 ORDINANCE NO. 2022- ADOPTED: ______________ AN ORDINANCE : APPROVING TLZM 2019-0001, VIRGINIA VILLAGE, TO REZONE 18.48 ACRES FROM
R-22, MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL, CD-MUR, CRESCENT DISTRICT - MIXEDUSE RESIDENTIAL, CD-CC, CRESCENT DISTRICT - COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR, AND GATEWAY DISTRICT (OVERLAY) TO CD-RH, CRESCENT DISTRICT
- RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY AND CD-CC, CRESCENT DISTRICT - CORRIDOR COMMERCIAL DISTRICT WHEREAS, the rezoning application TLZM-2019-0001, Virginia Village, has been filed by Keane
Enterprises to rezone approximately 18.48 acres from R-22, Multi-Family Residential, CD-MUR, Crescent District-Mixed-Use Residential, CD-CC, Crescent DistrictCommercial Corridor and
Gateway District (Overlay), to CD-RH, Crescent District Residential High Density and CD-CC, Crescent District-Corridor Commercial, subject to a Concept Plan and Proffers; and WHEREAS,
the property subject to this rezoning is identified as Loudoun County Parcel Identification Numbers (PIN) 231-17-9342, 231-17-7713, 231-18-0311, 231-18-5606, 232-47-9494, 232-48-2685
and 231-18-0407; and WHEREAS, the development of the property includes up to 165,800 square feet of non-residential uses in the CD-CC District and up to 643 residential dwelling units;
and WHEREAS, on August 5, 2021, the Planning Commission held a duly advertised public hearing on this application; and WHEREAS, on November 4, 2021, the Planning Commission recommended
denial of Rezoning Application TLZM-2019-0001, Virginia Village; and WHEREAS, Town Staff recommends approval of this rezoning application; and 190 Item a. AN ORDINANCE: APPROVING
TLZM 2019-0001, VIRGINIA VILLAGE, TO REZONE 18.48 ACRES FROM R-22, MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL, CD-MUR, CRESCENT DISTRICT - MIXED-USE RESIDENTIAL, CD-CC, CRESCENT DISTRICT - COMMERCIAL
CORRIDOR, AND GATEWAY DISTRICT (OVERLAY) TO CD-RH, CRESCENT DISTRICT - RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY AND CD-CC, CRESCENT DISTRICT - CORRIDOR COMMERCIAL DISTRICT -2- WHEREAS, on November
23, 2021 the Town Council held a duly advertised public hearing on this application; and WHEREAS, Town Council has determined that the Approval Criteria of Zoning Ordinance Section
3.3.15 have been satisfied; and WHEREAS, the Town Council has concluded that the approval of the application would be in the public interest and in accordance with sound zoning and
planning principles. THEREFORE, ORDAINED, by the Council of the Town of Leesburg in Virginia as follows: SECTION I. Rezoning application TLZM-2019-0001, Virginia Village, as identified
above, is hereby approved; and SECTION II. Development of the property is subject to the Proffer Statement dated January 7 10, 2022; and SECTION III. Development of the property
shall be in substantial conformance with the concept plan prepared by Urban last revised October 27, 2021; and SECTION IV. Approval of this application includes approval of the
following thirtytwo (32) section modifications listed on Sheet C11-01 of the Concept Plan, subject to conditions as follows: 1. (#16 on Sheet C11-01) Modify TLZO Sec. 7.10.6.E.2.b.i
Cornices and Other Features to permit cornices to extend beyond 12 inches, subject to the following condition: a. Cornices shall extend no more than three feet (3’) from the building
face, and the width of the cornice shall be appropriate for the mass and height of the building. 2. (#17) Modify TLZO Sec. 7.10.6.F.2 [Corner Buildings and Terminating Views] Entrances
to permit main entrances to be located as shown on Sheets A5-01, A601 and A6-02 for Buildings D and E, subject to the following conditions: 191 Item a. AN ORDINANCE: APPROVING TLZM
2019-0001, VIRGINIA VILLAGE, TO REZONE 18.48 ACRES FROM R-22, MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL, CD-MUR, CRESCENT DISTRICT - MIXED-USE RESIDENTIAL, CD-CC, CRESCENT DISTRICT - COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR,
AND GATEWAY DISTRICT (OVERLAY) TO CD-RH, CRESCENT DISTRICT - RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY AND CD-CC, CRESCENT DISTRICT - CORRIDOR COMMERCIAL DISTRICT -3- a. Building D shall be oriented
and have corner architecture at the Catoctin/Fairfax intersection as shown on Sheet A5-01. b. Building E shall be oriented and have corner architecture as shown on Sheet A5-02 A6-01
and A6-02 and amenities as shown on Sheet C5-03 and Sheet L1-05. c. Building F shall be oriented and have amenities as shown on Sheet A7-01 on Sheet C5-02 and Sheet L1-03. 3. (#20)
Modify TLZO Sec. 7.10.6.G.7.c Dormer Windows to permit townhouses to have no dormer windows as shown on Sheets A1-01 through A1-05 for the Townhouse & 2-Over-2 Elevations, subject to
the following conditions: a. The townhouses shall be flat-roofed with a terrace on the top floor as shown on Sheets A1-01 through A1-05. If townhouses with pitched roofs are proposed,
dormers shall be required in accordance with TLZO Sec. 7.10.6.G.7.c Dormer Windows. 4. (#41) Modify TLZO Sec. 7.10.6.H.6.a [Windows/Doors] General Urban Building, Ground Floor to permit
commercial buildings to have window transparency for Buildings B and C of less than 50% as shown on Sheets A3-01, subject to the following conditions: a. The Building B South Elevation
Ground Floor Primary Façade Window percentage shall be no less than 38% as shown on Sheet A3-01. b. The Building C West Elevation Ground Floor Primary Façade Window percentage shall
be no less than 42% as shown on Sheet A4-01. 5. (#21) Modify TLZO Sec. 7.10.6.H.6.b [Windows/Doors] Storefront Building, Ground Floor to permit commercial Buildings A, E and F to have
less than 70% window coverage on the primary facade as shown on Sheets A2-01, A2-02, A6-01, A6-02, and A7-01, subject to the following conditions: a. The Building A Ground Floor Primary
Façade Window percentage shall be as indicated below using the Applicant’s method of window transparency calculation: i. East Elevation: No less than 50% as shown on Sheet A2-01 ii.
South Elevation: No less than 31% as shown on Sheet A2-01 iii. North Elevation: No less than 31% as shown on Sheet A2-02 192 Item a. AN ORDINANCE: APPROVING TLZM 2019-0001, VIRGINIA
VILLAGE, TO REZONE 18.48 ACRES FROM R-22, MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL, CD-MUR, CRESCENT DISTRICT - MIXED-USE RESIDENTIAL, CD-CC, CRESCENT DISTRICT - COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR, AND GATEWAY DISTRICT
(OVERLAY) TO CD-RH, CRESCENT DISTRICT - RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY AND CD-CC, CRESCENT DISTRICT - CORRIDOR COMMERCIAL DISTRICT -4- b. The Building E Ground Floor Primary Façade
Window percentage shall be as indicated below using the Applicant’s method of window transparency calculation: i. South Elevation: No less than 37% as shown on Sheet A6-01 ii. West
Elevation: No less than 42% as shown on Sheet A6-02 iii. North Elevation: No less than 31% as shown on Sheet A6-02 c. The Building F Ground Floor Primary Façade Window percentage shall
be as indicated below using the Applicant’s method of window transparency calculation: i. West Elevation: No less than 33% as shown on Sheet A7-01 ii. South Elevation: No less than
31% as shown on Sheet A7-01 iii. North Elevation: No less than 13% as shown on Sheet A7-01 (cannot be reduced to 10%) 6. (#22) Modify TLZO Sec. 7.10.6.H.6.e [Windows/Doors] Upper
Stories to permit commercial buildings (General Urban and Storefront) to have less than 50% window coverage on the facade as shown on Sheets A3-01 and A4-01 for Buildings B and C, subject
to the following conditions: a. The Building B South Elevation (High Fairfax Street facade) Upper Story Window percentage shall be no less than 40% as shown on Sheet A3-01. b. The
Building B East Elevation (Ours Overlook façade) Upper Story Window percentage shall be no less than 40% as shown on Sheet A3-01. c. The Building B West Elevation Upper Story Window
percentage shall be no less than 41% as shown on Sheet A3-01. d. The Building C South Elevation Upper Story Window percentage shall be no less than 27% as shown on Sheet A4-01. e.
The Building C North Elevation Upper Story Window percentage shall be no less than 23% as shown on Sheet A4-01. f. The Building C West Elevation Upper Story Window percentage shall
be no less than 25% as shown on Sheet A4-01. 7. (#24) Modify TLZO Sec. 7.10.6.I.2 Windows to permit Mixed Use Commercial Buildings (General Urban and Storefront) to have less than
50% window coverage 193 Item a. AN ORDINANCE: APPROVING TLZM 2019-0001, VIRGINIA VILLAGE, TO REZONE 18.48 ACRES FROM R-22, MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL, CD-MUR, CRESCENT DISTRICT - MIXED-USE
RESIDENTIAL, CD-CC, CRESCENT DISTRICT - COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR, AND GATEWAY DISTRICT (OVERLAY) TO CD-RH, CRESCENT DISTRICT - RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY AND CD-CC, CRESCENT DISTRICT - CORRIDOR
COMMERCIAL DISTRICT -5- on the facade as shown on Sheets A2-01, A2-02, A6-01 and A6-02 for Buildings A and E, subject to the following conditions: a. The Building A Upper Story
Window percentage shall be as indicated below using the Applicant’s method of window transparency calculation: i. East Elevation: No less than 28% as shown on Sheet A2-01 ii. South
Elevation: No less than 26% as shown on Sheet A2-01 iii. North Elevation: No less than 28% as shown on Sheet A2-02 b. The Building E Upper Story Window percentage shall be as indicated
below using the Applicant’s method of window transparency calculation: i. South Elevation: No less than 25% as shown on Sheet A6-01. Note #5 on this Sheet cannot be used to reduce this
25% minimum by another 3%. In no case shall the upper story window percentage be less than 25%. ii. North Elevation: No less than 26% as shown on Sheet A6-02. Note #5 on this Sheet
cannot be used to reduce this 26% minimum by another 3%. In no case shall the upper story window percentage be less than 25%. c. West Elevation: No less than 28% as shown on Sheet
A6-02. 8. (#40) Modify TLZO Sec. 7.10.6.G.4 Windows to permit Residential Buildings to have window coverage as shown on the primary facades and secondary facades as shown on Sheets
A1-01, A1-02, A1-03, A1-04, A5-01 and A6-01, subject to the following conditions: a. The Building D East Elevation Primary & Secondary Façade Window percentage shall be no less than
23% as shown on Sheet A5-01. i. The other facades shall meet or exceed the 25% window percentage as shown on Sheet A5-01. ii. The “Rear Façade” label on Sheet A5-01 for the East Elevation
shall be revised to read “Secondary Front Façade” per TLZO Sec. 7.10.6.E.3.b. b. The Townhouse Primary Front Façade window percentage shall be no less than 20% for the interior units
(23% window percentage) as shown on Sheet A1-01. i. The other two façade types shall meet or exceed the 25% window percentage as shown on Sheet A1-01. c. The Stacked Townhouse (2-over-2)
Primary Front Façade Window percentage shall be no less than 24% as shown on Sheet A1-03. i. The other two facades shall meet or exceed the 25% window percentage as shown on Sheet A1-03.
194 Item a. AN ORDINANCE: APPROVING TLZM 2019-0001, VIRGINIA VILLAGE, TO REZONE 18.48 ACRES FROM R-22, MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL, CD-MUR, CRESCENT DISTRICT - MIXED-USE RESIDENTIAL,
CD-CC, CRESCENT DISTRICT - COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR, AND GATEWAY DISTRICT (OVERLAY) TO CD-RH, CRESCENT DISTRICT - RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY AND CD-CC, CRESCENT DISTRICT - CORRIDOR COMMERCIAL
DISTRICT -6- d. The Townhouse Secondary Façade Window percentage shall be no less than 18.1% for Non-High Visibility End Units and 17.7% for High Visibility End Units as shown
on Sheet A1-02. e. The Stacked Townhouse (2-over-2) Secondary Façade Window percentage shall be no less than 19.8% for High Visibility End Unit transparency as shown on Sheet A1-05.
9. (#26) Modify TLZO Sec. 7.10.6.L Parking Structure Building Design Specifications to permit no buildings to wrap the parking structure as shown on Sheets A2-02, A3-01 and A5-01.
This has application to Buildings A, B and D, subject to the following conditions: a. A portion of the Building A Parking Structure as shown on Sheet A2-02 West Elevation that is not
wrapped may be composed of materials as shown in the Illustrations on Sheet A2-03 as approved by the Town of Leesburg. b. The open, exposed areas of the second story of the Building
B garage on the North Elevation shown on Sheet A3-01 should be revised to shall include architectural panels/screens as shown on Sheet A3-01 or other work to better screen the garage
from residential uses while permitting adequate airflow. c. The Building D parking structure wrapping shall be modified as shown on Sheet A5-01 Building D Elevations. 10. (#11) Modify
the requirements of TLZO Sec. 7.10.5.B Bicycle Facilities to permit bicycle parking in streetscape areas, subject to the following conditions: a. Bike racks shall be generally provided
as shown on Sheets L4-01 and L4-03 for bike racks in the streetscape areas and inside the parking structures for Buildings A, B, D and E as shown on Sheets A8-01 through A8-04. 11.
(#13) Modify TLZO Sec. 7.10.5.D.2.a to decrease the required buffer to less than 20 feet in the areas as shown on Sheet L4-12 for Buffer #5 adjacent to the Madison House to the east
of the proposed townhouses subject to the following conditions: 195 Item a. AN ORDINANCE: APPROVING TLZM 2019-0001, VIRGINIA VILLAGE, TO REZONE 18.48 ACRES FROM R-22, MULTIFAMILY
RESIDENTIAL, CD-MUR, CRESCENT DISTRICT - MIXED-USE RESIDENTIAL, CD-CC, CRESCENT DISTRICT - COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR, AND GATEWAY DISTRICT (OVERLAY) TO CD-RH, CRESCENT DISTRICT - RESIDENTIAL
HIGH DENSITY AND CD-CC, CRESCENT DISTRICT - CORRIDOR COMMERCIAL DISTRICT -7- a. The reduced buffer area shall comply with the illustration shown on page 9 of the Request for Zoning
Modifications & Statement of Justification revised through October 2, 2020. b. The six foot (6’) masonry wall shall comply with Site Wall Typology F – Screen Wall Treatment 2 as shown
on Sheet L6-01. 12. (#14) Modify TLZO Sec. 7.10.5.G.6.e to decrease the required tree canopy coverage for open space to less than 50% for the Town Branch area on Sheets L107 and L1-07A
D.2.a to decrease the required buffer to less than 20 feet in the areas as shown on Sheet L4-12 for Buffer #5 adjacent to the Madison House to the east of the proposed townhouses, subject
to the following conditions: a. The percentage of tree canopy coverage in the proposed Town Branch Useable Open Space Area shall be no less than 24% (18,360 s.f.). 13. (#29) Modify
TLZO Sec. 7.10.58.E.1 to reduce the required 49.5-foot building setback to 30 feet in the areas as shown on Sheet C5-01. Applicant includes the setback modifications in the following
areas into a single request: #1. Western property line adjacent to eight (8) SFD lots on S. King Street; and #2. Eastern property line adjacent to the Madison House multifamily use,
subject to the following conditions: a. The required 49.5-foot setback from the adjacent residential property lines to the west of the townhouse units adjacent to the R-HD District,
and to the east of the townhouse units adjacent to the Madison House Property in the R-22 District may be reduced to a minimum of thirty feet (30’) as shown on Sheet C5-01 based on
49.5-foot tall townhouse units with a 38.6-foot height at the 30’ setback line. 14. (#25) Modify TLZO Sec. 7.10.6.I.3 [Mixed Use Commercial Building Design Specifications] Ground Floor
Minimum Height to permit the residential portions of these mixed use buildings to have a minimum ground-floor height of 12 feet for Buildings A and E, subject to the following conditions:
a. The ground floor residential portions of Buildings A and E shown on Sheets A5-01, A5-02, A6-01 and A6-02 shall be a minimum of 12.0 feet in height, floor to floor. The commercial
portions as shown on those sheets shall be a minimum of 14.0 feet in height, floor to floor. 15. (#1) Modify TLZO Sec. 7.10.3.A.1.i to permit Building E, a mixed-use building, to be
up to six (6) stories, subject to the following conditions: 196 Item a. AN ORDINANCE: APPROVING TLZM 2019-0001, VIRGINIA VILLAGE, TO REZONE 18.48 ACRES FROM R-22, MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL,
CD-MUR, CRESCENT DISTRICT - MIXED-USE RESIDENTIAL, CD-CC, CRESCENT DISTRICT - COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR, AND GATEWAY DISTRICT (OVERLAY) TO CD-RH, CRESCENT DISTRICT - RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY
AND CD-CC, CRESCENT DISTRICT - CORRIDOR COMMERCIAL DISTRICT -8- a. Building E may be up to six stories and no more than 70 feet in height as shown on Sheet A6-01. 16. (#4 & 28)
Modify TLZO Sec. 7.10.8.A [Height Zone Table] to permit Building E, a mixed-use building, to be up to six (6) stories, subject to the following conditions: a. Building E may be up
to six stories and no more than 70 feet in height as shown on Sheet A6-01. 17. (#34) Modify TLZO Sec. 7.10.9.H.2.E to permit buildings to be up to six (6) stories in the CD-CC District,
subject to the following conditions: a. Building D may be up to six stories and no more than 70 feet in height as shown on Sheet A5-01. 18. (#6, 28 & 30) Modify TLZO Sec. 7.10.3.B.2
[Buildings], shall comply with TLZO Sec. 7.10.8 Height Zones], TLZO Sec. 7.10.8.A.1 Minimum Height and Stories Required, and TLZO Sec. 7.10.8.F Height Zones to permit Building F, a
commercial building, to be reduced to 1 story with a minimum height of 20 to 25 feet, subject to the following conditions: a. Building F may be constructed as a one-story building
subject to the following conditions: i. The building shall retain a gable-roof style. ii. The minimum building height shall be 25 feet. b. The final building design and appearance
must meet CDD requirements and the description contained within this modification. 19. (#37) Modify the streetscape requirements (Tree Zone width) of TLZO Sec.7.10.11.A.2.a for the
Catoctin Circle Urban Boulevard as shown on Sheet L204, subject to the following conditions: a. The Tree Zone along Catoctin Circle shall be a minimum of six feet (6’) in width. b.
The Pedestrian Zone shall be a minimum of nine feet (9’) in width supplemented by additional Frontage Zone area as generally shown on Sheets C5-02, C5-03 and Sheet L1-07. 197 Item
a. AN ORDINANCE: APPROVING TLZM 2019-0001, VIRGINIA VILLAGE, TO REZONE 18.48 ACRES FROM R-22, MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL, CD-MUR, CRESCENT DISTRICT - MIXED-USE RESIDENTIAL, CD-CC, CRESCENT
DISTRICT - COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR, AND GATEWAY DISTRICT (OVERLAY) TO CD-RH, CRESCENT DISTRICT - RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY AND CD-CC, CRESCENT DISTRICT - CORRIDOR COMMERCIAL DISTRICT
-9- 20. (#38) Modify TLZO Sec.7.10.11.A.2.c Residential Streets/Optional Streets for street cross sections for Madison Court, Fairfax Street and High Street as shown on Sheets L2-02,
L2-03 and L2-04, subject to the following conditions: a. Fairfax Street Pedestrian Zone/Building Frontage Zone - Building E – East Side: Approval subject to the following condition:
i. The combined Pedestrian Zone/Building Frontage Zone shall be no less than eight and one half feet (8’6”) in width for a length to exceed no more than 40% of the Building E east façade
as shown on Sheet C5-03. b. Fairfax Street Pedestrian Zone/Building Frontage Zone - Building D – West Side: Approval subject to the following condition: i. The combined Pedestrian
Zone/Building Frontage Zone shall be no less than nine feet (9’0”) in width for a length not to exceed that shown on the Building D west façade as shown on Sheet C5-03. c. High Street
Building A – East Side: Approval subject to the following condition: i. The combined Pedestrian Zone/Building Frontage Zone shall be no less than thirteen feet (13’0”) in width for
a length to exceed no more than 60% of the Building A east façade as shown on Sheet C5-02 and Sheet L2-03 d. High Street Park – On High Street: Approval subject to the following condition:
i. The Pedestrian Zone along the east side of High Street may be reduced to a minimum width of six feet (6’) as shown on Sheet C502 and Sheet L2-03. 21. (#7) Modify TLZO Sec.7.10.4.A
[Siting Specifications Table] to match the street cross sections shown on Sheets L2-01 through L2-04 of the CDP, subject to the following conditions: a. The Frontage Zone along the
east and west sides of Madison Court may be reduced to a minimum width of four feet (4’) as shown on Sheet C5-01 and Sheet L2-02. 22. (#27) Modify TLZO Sec.7.10.7.B.5 [Awnings and
Similar Features] Illumination to permit awnings to be internally illuminated in outdoor dining areas, subject to the following conditions: 198 Item a. AN ORDINANCE: APPROVING TLZM
2019-0001, VIRGINIA VILLAGE, TO REZONE 18.48 ACRES FROM R-22, MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL, CD-MUR, CRESCENT DISTRICT - MIXED-USE RESIDENTIAL, CD-CC, CRESCENT DISTRICT - COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR,
AND GATEWAY DISTRICT (OVERLAY) TO CD-RH, CRESCENT DISTRICT - RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY AND CD-CC, CRESCENT DISTRICT - CORRIDOR COMMERCIAL DISTRICT -10- a. Awnings for outdoor dining
areas may be internally illuminated but by down lighting only; up lighting under awnings shall not be permitted. 23. (#32) Modify the requirements of TLZO Sec. 7.10.9.H.2.C Maximum
Density to permit a maximum density above 24 dwelling units per acre in the CD-CC District, subject to the Proffers dated October 27, 2021 and the Concept Plan revised through October
27, 2021. 24. (#23) Modify the requirements of TLZO Sec. 7.10.6.I Mixed Use Commercial Buildings Design Specifications to permit Buildings A, D and E to have residential uses on portions
of the ground floor, subject to the following conditions: a. The percentage of nonresidential uses on the ground floor in Building A shall be no less than 53% as shown on the diagram
at page 15 in Exhibit A dated 3/12/21. b. The percentage of nonresidential uses on the ground floor in Building E shall be no less than 45% as shown on the diagram at page 15 in Exhibit
A dated 3/12/21. 25. (#35) Modify TLZO Sec. 7.10.10.A.2.a Mix of Uses Required to permit a reduction from the 40% nonresidential GFA requirement to 20%, subject to the following condition:
a. The percentage of nonresidential square footage at building shall not be less than 22% of the total square footage of the property. 26. (#44) Modify TLZO Sec. 14.2.2 Reduced Setbacks
to obtain a buffer reduction to less than 50 feet along Town Branch, subject to the following conditions: a. The 50-foot Creek Valley Buffer may be reduced for Building D to the extent
shown in illustration depicted in the 4th Submission Consolidated Comments Response Letter dated March 22, 2021 on page 103. 27. (#45) Modify TLZO Sec. 11.9 Number of Loading Spaces
Required to allow for seven (7) loading spaces to serve the site, subject to the following conditions: a. The number of off-street loading spaces serving the property shall be a minimum
of seven (7) spaces, distributed as follows: Two (2) in Building A; One (1) in Building B; One (1) in Building C; One (1) in Building D; and Two (2) in Building E. 199 Item a. AN
ORDINANCE: APPROVING TLZM 2019-0001, VIRGINIA VILLAGE, TO REZONE 18.48 ACRES FROM R-22, MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL, CD-MUR, CRESCENT DISTRICT - MIXED-USE RESIDENTIAL, CD-CC, CRESCENT DISTRICT
- COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR, AND GATEWAY DISTRICT (OVERLAY) TO CD-RH, CRESCENT DISTRICT - RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY AND CD-CC, CRESCENT DISTRICT - CORRIDOR COMMERCIAL DISTRICT -11- b.
Appropriate legal instruments to ensure the availability of the spaces for such uses are approved by the Town Attorney prior to approval to any site plan containing Buildings A, B,
C, D or E. 28. (#46) Modify TLZO Sec. 7.10.6.H.3.a and b for TLZO Sec. 7.10.6.H.2.b Storefront Buildings to allow for a minimum of one (1) pedestrian entrance for every 45 feet of
building frontage, subject to the following conditions: a. The number of pedestrian entrances for a storefront building is modified from one pedestrian entrance for every 25 feet of
frontage to a minimum of one entrance door that will face the street for each retail tenant. 29. (#29) Modify TLZO Sec. 7.10.5.A Parking to permit multifamily parking to use the B-1
District standard, subject to the following conditions: a. The parking rate for multifamily units in the Virginia Village project shall be as follows: i. Efficiency and 1 Bedroom: 1.0
parking spaces per unit ii. Two (2) Bedroom: 1.5 parking spaces per unit iii. Three (3) or more Bedrooms: 2.5 parking spaces per unit (includes residential condominiums) 30. Modify
TLZO Sec. 7.10.7.C.1.b.2 façade extensions to permit more than a 40% extension across the Build-to Line for Buildings A and D, subject to the following conditions: a. Building A may
project up to 45% into the Projection Zone as shown on Sheet C5-02. b. Building B may project up to 65% into the Projection Zone as shown on Sheet C5-03. SECTION V. This
ordinance shall be in effect upon its passage. PASSED this 11th day of January, 2022. ______________________________ Kelly Burk, Mayor 200 Item a. AN ORDINANCE: APPROVING
TLZM 2019-0001, VIRGINIA VILLAGE, TO REZONE 18.48 ACRES FROM R-22, MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL, CD-MUR, CRESCENT DISTRICT - MIXED-USE RESIDENTIAL, CD-CC, CRESCENT DISTRICT - COMMERCIAL
CORRIDOR, AND GATEWAY DISTRICT (OVERLAY) TO CD-RH, CRESCENT DISTRICT - RESIDENTIAL HIGH DENSITY AND CD-CC, CRESCENT DISTRICT - CORRIDOR COMMERCIAL DISTRICT -12- Town of Leesburg
ATTEST: ______________________________ Clerk of Council 201 Item a. PRESENTED: January 11, 2022 RESOLUTION NO. 2022- ADOPTED: _______________ A RESOLUTION : APPROVING SPECIAL
EXCEPTION TLSE-2020-0004, VIRGINIA VILLAGE FLOODPLAIN ALTERATION TO ALLOW THE ALTERATION OF THE FLOODPLAIN BOUNDARIES IN THE NORTHEAST QUADRANT OF THE PROPERTY ALONG TOWN BRANCH WHEREAS,
an application has been filed by Keane Enterprises requesting Special Exception approval for the alteration of the floodplain boundaries situated in the northeast quadrant of the property
along Town Branch; and WHEREAS, the property will be graded and fill added to alter the boundaries of the floodplain to install a pedestrian bridge as part of the Virginia Village
mixed-use development; and WHEREAS, the property is within the Creek Valley Buffer Overlay District and Floodplain Overlay District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly
advertised Public Hearing for Special Exception TLSE-2020-0004 on August 5, 2021 and at its meeting on November 4, 2021 the Planning Commission recommended approval to the Town Council;
and WHEREAS, staff recommends approval subject to conditions; and WHEREAS, the Town Council held a duly advertised Public Hearing on November 23, 2021; and WHEREAS, Town Council
has determined that the special exception approval criteria of Zoning Ordinance Sections 3.4.12, and the use standards for a special exception in the Floodplain Overlay District of
Zoning Ordinance Section 7.11.10 have been satisfied; and 202 Item a. A RESOLUTION: APPROVING SPECIAL EXCEPTION TLSE-2020-0004, VIRGINIA VILLAGE FLOODPLAIN ALTERATION TO ALLOW THE
ALTERATION OF THE FLOODPLAIN BOUNDARIES IN THE NORTHEAST QUADRANT OF THE PROPERTY ALONG TOWN BRANCH -2- 07/30/2021 WHEREAS, Town Council has determined that the proposal will serve
the public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice. THEREFORE, RESOLVED, by the Council of the Town of Leesburg in Virginia that Special Exception application
TLSE-2020-0004, Virginia Village Floodplain Alteration, is hereby approved to permit the alteration of floodplain boundaries subject to the following: 1. Substantial Conformance:
The floodplain alteration and limits of clearing and grading on the Property shall be in substantial conformance with the plat entitled “Virginia Village Zoning Map Amendment – Special
Exception”, dated July 3, 2019 revised through October 27, 2021, prepared by Urban, Ltd., and also identified as Sheet C18-01, with reasonable allowances to be made for engineering
and design alteration to meet Town Subdivision and Land Development Regulations, Zoning Ordinance, or Design and Construction Standards Manual requirements. 2. No Waivers Expressed
or Implied: Approval of this special exception does not express or imply any waiver or modification of the requirements set forth in the Subdivision and Land Development Regulations,
the Zoning Ordinance, or the Design and Construction Standards Manual, except as may have been approved as part of this application. Final plats, site plans, and construction drawings
are subject to the applicable town regulations. PASSED this 11th day of January, 2022. ______________________________ Kelly Burk, Mayor Town of Leesburg ATTEST: ___________________
___________ Clerk of Council 203 Item a. PROFFERS VIRGINIA VILLAGE TLZM 2019-0001 February 27, 2020 October 2, 2020 March 22, 2021 July 1, 2021 October 18, 2021 October 27, 2021
November 4, 2021 November 16, 2021 December 9, 2021 December 10, 2021 December 21, 2021 January 7, 2022 January 10, 2022 Virginia Village Holdings, LLC, the owner (hereinafter, “Owner”)
of approximately 18.48 acres of land, more particularly described as Loudoun County PIN ##231-17-9342, 231-18-0470, 23118-0311, 231-17-7713, 232-47-9494, 231-18-5606, and 232-48-2685
(hereinafter, the “Property”), more fully depicted on the Concept Plan identified in Proffer 1, below, hereby voluntarily proffers, pursuant to Va. Code Ann. § 15.2-2303 and § 3.3.16
of the Zoning Ordinance of the Town of Leesburg (the “Zoning Ordinance”) that in the event the Property is rezoned by the Town Council of Leesburg, Virginia (the “Town”) to the Crescent
District-High Density (“CD-RH”) sub-district and the Crescent District-Commercial Corridor (“CD-CC”) subdistrict as depicted on the Concept Plan and pursuant to this Town of Leesburg
Zoning Amendment application TLZM 2019-0001 (the “Application”), the development of the Property shall be in substantial conformance with the following conditions (“Proffers”). All
exhibits referred to in these Proffers are attached and incorporated into these Proffers. These Proffers are the only conditions offered on this rezoning application and are contingent
upon the approval of Town Plan Amendment TLTA 2019-0001 in the pending application and upon approval of the zoning modification requests (the “Zoning Ordinance Modifications”) requested
by the Owner in conjunction with the Application. LAND USE & DEVELOPMENT SCOPE 1. Concept Plan. Development of the Property shall be in substantial conformance with the Zoning Map
Amendment Concept Plan, prepared by Urban Ltd., dated July 3, 2019 and revised through October 27, 2021 (the “Concept Plan”), which is attached to these Proffers as Exhibit A. The Concept
Plan shall control the use, layout and configuration of the Property, with reasonable allowances to be made for engineering and design alteration and to meet Town zoning, subdivision,
and land development regulations. 204 Item a. TLZM 2019-0001 Page 2 2. Proposed Development. As more particularly set forth on Sheets C5-01, C5-02, C5-03, and C5-04 of the
Concept Plan, the Property is divided into separate development blocks with multiple buildings. The Property shall be developed with a mix of uses as follows: a. In the CD-CC Zoning
District. As depicted on Sheets C5-01, C5-02, C5-03, and C5-04 of the Concept Plan, the CD-CC-zoned portion of the Property may be developed with up to a maximum of 100,800 square feet
of office uses and up to a maximum of 65,000 square feet of retail and other nonresidential uses as listed in Table § 7.10.9.D.1 of the Zoning Ordinance under the headings “Commercial
Uses,” “Research & Development, Production and Warehousing Uses,” and “Institutional and Community Service Uses” as well as up to 562 Multiple-Family residential dwelling units. b.
In the CD-RH District. As depicted on Sheet C5-01 of the plan set, the CD-RHzoned portion of the Property may be developed with up to a maximum of 53 Single-Family Attached dwelling
units (each a “Townhouse”) and up to 28 SingleFamily Attached dwelling units (each a “Stacked Townhouse”), as defined in § 18.1.172 et seq. of the Zoning Ordinance. c. Special Exception
& Special Permit Uses. Uses allowed by special exception (“TLSE”) in the CD-CC and CD-RH zoning districts may be permitted on the Property without the need for an amendment to this
Application, provided they are authorized through a separate TLSE process and are in substantial conformance with these Proffers and the Concept Plan. d. Prohibited Uses. The following
uses shall not be permitted on the Property without an amendment to this Application: service station or a vehicle and/or equipment service facility, bank with drive-in facility, car
wash, commercial inn, and outdoor storage area; provided that temporary outdoor storage for construction purposes shall be permitted. 3. Square Footage Transfer. The square footage
within each building depicted on Sheet C202 of the Concept Plan will be established at time of site plan. A maximum of 10 percent of the established square footage of each building
may be transferred between the buildings on the Property provided: (a) the reallocated square footage can be accommodated within the minimum proposed and maximum proposed building heights
for each building utilizing the reallocated square footage as shown on the Concept Plan; (b) the maximum square footage for the Property is not exceeded; (c) the minimum overall open
space on the Property, as depicted on Sheet L1-06 of the Concept Plan, is not reduced; (d) the proposed development is otherwise in substantial conformance with these Proffers and the
Concept Plan, as applicable; and (e) nonresidential square footage is not converted to residential 205 Item a. TLZM 2019-0001 Page 3 square footage and the maximum number of
residential dwelling units permitted under Proffer 2 is not exceeded. 4. Building Heights. Final building height shall be determined at the time of site plan approval, provided all
building heights on the Property shall not be less than the proposed minimum building heights, nor exceed the proposed maximum heights, identified on Sheet C2-02 of the Concept Plan.
5. Development Phasing. The Owner will construct streets and provide pedestrian improvements, publicly-accessible parks and facilities, and private amenities on the Property as depicted
on the Concept Plan in conjunction with the development of each new building and block in a manner that reflects the intent of that depicted within the Phasing Plan provided on Sheet
C13-02 of the Concept Plan and as further described in these Proffers. Development on the Property shall proceed in the following order; however, nothing contained in this proffer or
depicted on the Phasing Plan shall preclude the Owner’s ability to develop Building B earlier in time: a. Phase 1: Phase 1 may consist of up to a maximum of 53 Townhouses, 28 Stacked
Townhouses, 224 Multiple-Family residential dwelling units in Building A, and 25,500 square feet of retail uses in Building A. A minimum of 23,000 square feet of commercial uses, inclusive
of up to 3,000 square feet of service or office uses, shall be constructed in Phase 1. b. Phase 2: The Owner shall process a single site plan for Phase 2, which shall include the
design and bonding for construction of any amenities in Phase 2 as noted in these Proffers. The Phase 2 site plan may include an infrastructure phase and up to a maximum of three additional
sub-phases as follows: i. Phase 2A: Phase 2A may consist of up to a maximum of 266 MultipleFamily residential dwelling units and 25,000 square feet of retail uses in Building E and
Building F. A minimum of 23,500 square feet of retail uses shall be constructed in Phase 2A. ii. Phase 2B: Phase 2B may consist of up to a maximum of 72 Multiple-Family residential
dwelling units in Building D, and 6,000 square feet of retail uses and 41,500 square feet of office uses in Building C. A minimum of 40,000 square feet of commercial uses shall be constructed
in Phase 2B. Building C shall be fully constructed and open for occupancy prior to the approval of the 37th occupancy permit for Building D. iii. Phase 2C: Phase 2C may consist of
up to a maximum of 8,500 square feet of retail uses and 59,300 square feet of office uses in Building B. 206 Item a. TLZM 2019-0001 Page 4 6. Minor Modifications. Pursuant
to § 3.3.20 of the Zoning Ordinance, minor modifications to the Concept Plan may be permitted as determined by the Land Development Official. 7. Water & Sewer. The Property will be
developed using Town central water supply and central sanitary sewer systems, with such facilities extended and provided to the Property at no cost to the Town, and in accordance with
Town standards. The Owner shall acquire any offsite easements, if needed, to extend public water and/or sanitary sewer lines to this site and shall convey them to the Town at no cost
to the Town. 8. Existing Development. As depicted on Sheet C3-01 of the Concept Plan, the Property is currently developed with commercial and retail buildings and associated surface
parking lots (the “Existing Development”). The Existing Development may remain in use, subject to all use limitations contained in the Zoning Ordinance, until such time as the Property
is redeveloped in accordance with this Application or as otherwise stated in these Proffers. In the event that only a portion of the Property is redeveloped subject to an approved site
plan or a site plan with sub-phases, as applicable, any portions of the Property not redeveloped pursuant to such site plan or site plan with sub-phases may continue in operation. The
Owner may secure site plan approvals, obtain building permits for, and make interior and exterior improvements to, the Existing Development in accordance with § 16.2.5 of the Zoning
Ordinance. 9. Property Owners Association. All property owners on the Property shall be members of a Property Owners Association (the “POA”) which shall establish covenants, declarations,
and related governance documents (together, the “POA Documents”) to regulate use and provide standards for construction and landscaping within the Property. All property owners shall
be subject to the POA Documents. The Owners shall establish the POA as an overall umbrella association and may also establish one or more sub-associations (for purposes of these Proffers,
the term “POA” shall also imply any sub-associations). Concurrent with the submission of the first record plat for any portion of the Property the Owner shall submit to the Town, for
review and approval, the POA Documents creating the POA. The POA shall be established, and the associated POA Documents shall be recorded in the Land Records of Loudoun County, prior
to the approval of the first record plat for any portion of the Property. a. General Responsibilities. The POA shall provide maintenance of all common areas, open space areas, and
active recreation areas, parking areas, and pedestrian facilities on the Property, as well as provide for trash removal and the maintenance of the Town Branch Pedestrian Bridge, defined
below in Proffer 18.b.ii. The POA shall also be responsible for the maintenance of all common recreational facilities on the Property, all storm drainage easements and stormwater management
207 Item a. TLZM 2019-0001 Page 5 facilities on the Property, all private streets and street lights internal to the Property, and all pedestrian facilities on the Property not
otherwise maintained by the Town. b. Townhome/Stacked Townhouse Garbage Collection. The POA Documents shall include a provision stating that the Town is responsible for garbage collection
for all Townhomes and Stacked Townhomes, and that the outdoor storage or placement of garbage cans is prohibited except for days of trash collection. c. Private Streets/Parking Courts.
The POA Documents shall include a disclosure that the private parking courts and streets will be the responsibility of the POA. d. Lighting. The POA Documents shall include a provision
making the POA responsible for monitoring and maintaining the building-mounted light fixtures which provide safety lighting for residential common parking court travelways (alleyways),
to ensure these light fixtures remain lit during nighttime hours, and to ensure light bulbs are replaced in a timely fashion. e. Streetscape Elements. The POA Documents shall include
a provision making the POA responsible for maintaining the Streetscape Elements, as that term is defined in Proffer 13, inclusive of all areas between the back of curb and the build-to
line, including landscape amenity panels and sidewalks, whether located within the public right-of-way or on private land with public access easements. f. Garage Conversions. The
POA Documents shall include a provision that will prohibit any garage space from being converted to any type of habitable and/or living space use, or any use which would preclude the
parking of vehicles and the storage of trash and recycling containers. 10. Affordable Dwelling Units. The Owner shall construct 33 Affordable Dwelling Units (“ADUs”) on the Property
in accordance with § 3.17 et seq. of the Zoning Ordinance. Four ADUs shall be provided in the Townhouse/Stacked Townhouse units, and 29 ADUs will be provided in Buildings A and E. All
of the ADUs shall comply with the regulations stated in § 3.17 of the Zoning Ordinance. URBAN DESIGN & PLACEMAKING 11. Architectural Design. The architectural design of the proposed
buildings on the Property will be in substantial conformance with the character and quality of the illustrative elevations, depicted on Sheets A1-01, A1-02, A1-03, A1-04, A1-05, A2-01,
A2-02, A203, A3-01, A4-01, A5-01, A6-01, A6-02, and A7-01 of the Concept Plan. 208 Item a. TLZM 2019-0001 Page 6 12. Retail Storefronts. Each retail tenant on the Property
shall have at least one entrance door that will face the street. 13. Streetscape Elements. The Owner shall install those streetscape improvements, street sections, and related elements
(jointly, the “Streetscape Elements”) as conceptually shown on Sheets L2-02, L2-03, and L2-04 of the Concept Plan. 14. Farmers Markets, Festivals, Fairs, Kiosks, or Similar Activities.
a. Generally. In accordance with the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, the Owner will be permitted to operate farmers markets, festivals, fairs, food vendors, food trucks,
or similar activities on the Property in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, including the need to obtain any requisite Temporary Use Permit. Subject
to the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance and other Town requirements, portions of the private street network may be closed for such activities, provided that reasonable
vehicular access is maintained and adequate detour signage is provided. b. Farmer’s Market Layout. An illustration depicting a potential layout of a farmer’s market on the Property
has been provided on Sheet L1-03 of the Concept Plan. The layout of such market may generally conform to such an illustration; however, the final determination of any such layout, including
related traffic circulation and pedestrian safety elements, shall be determined by the Owner in conformance with Town requirements, and shall be reflected on any requisite Temporary
Use Permit. 15. Parking Structure Design. The design of any proposed parking structures on the Property will be in substantial conformance with the illustrative elevations depicted
on Sheets A801, A8-02, A8-03, and A8-04 of the Concept Plan. 16. Onsite Artwork. The Owner may install artwork on the Property following consultation with the Town of Leesburg Public
Art Commission. The Owner shall make the final selection, and determine the location, of the any such artwork and shall incorporate such artwork into the development concurrent with
the development of adjacent buildings. Following installation of said artwork, the POA established pursuant to Proffer 9 shall be perpetually responsible for maintenance of said artwork.
The POA shall have the authority, in its sole discretion, to remove, replace, or alter said artwork. 17. Rooftop Amenity Spaces. Exterior areas located on the rooftop of Buildings
B and C may be used for recreational and commercial uses including, but not limited to, walking paths, sports courts, outdoor seating areas, pedestrian-scaled bollard lighting (not
to exceed four feet in height) and down-directed wall-mounted lighting, specialty landscape and hardscape areas, lawn areas, rooftop restaurant uses, exercise areas and other similar
uses 209 Item a. TLZM 2019-0001 Page 7 and activities. Light poles shall be prohibited on rooftops or the top levels of parking garages and all rooftop uses shall adhere to
all applicable Town noise and lighting standards. The square footage of any use of rooftop areas used for commercial purposes shall count against the maximum square footage permitted
under Proffer 2.a, with its hours of operation limited to no later than restaurant uses located on the ground floor of its respective building. 18. Amenity Space Areas. The Owner
will provide open space areas consistent with the locations, design elements, and minimum acreages depicted on Sheets L1-02, L1-03, and L1-04, and L1-05 of the Concept Plan, and as
further described in this proffer. The proposed development includes the following distinct open space areas: a. High Street Park. As depicted on Sheet L1-03 of the Concept Plan, the
Owner shall install a public linear park (the “High Street Park”) on the Property adjacent to Building E, which may include active recreation elements, hardscape elements, landscaping,
seating areas, interpretive signage, play areas, shade structures, and public art/sculptural elements. High Street Park shall be bonded prior to the approval of the first site plan
for Building E. High Street Park, with the exception of those areas depicted as “Tenant Improvement Area” on Sheet L4-01 of the Concept Plan, shall be open for public use prior to the
approval of the occupancy permit for the 450th residential dwelling unit on the Property. Said Tenant Improvement Areas shall be completed by individual ground floor commercial tenants
as Building E is leased to said commercial tenants; prior to completion, said Tenant Improvement Areas shall be improved with grass or artificial turf. b. Ours Overlook/Pedestrian
Bridge/Town Branch Park i. Ours Overlook. As depicted on Sheet L1-02 of the Concept Plan, the Owner will install a pedestrian plaza (the “Ours Overlook”) on the Property between Buildings
B and C, and may include hardscape elements, landscaping, seating areas, interpretive signage, shade structures, and public art/sculptural elements. The Ours Overlook shall be bonded
prior to the approval of the first site plan for Building E and constructed prior to the issuance of the 37th occupancy permit in Building D. ii. Town Branch Pedestrian Bridge. As
depicted on Sheet C5-04 of the Concept Plan, the Owner shall design and construct a pedestrian bridge, inclusive of abutments, piers and approaches, across Town Branch (the “Pedestrian
Bridge”) between Harrison Street and the Ours Overlook in the general locations depicted as “Bridge” on Sheet C5-04 of the Concept Plan. Said Pedestrian Bridge shall have a deck approximately
12-feet wide, and will be constructed of steel, wood, and/or concrete; provided that, in 210 Item a. TLZM 2019-0001 Page 8 any event, the Pedestrian Bridge will not be constructed
entirely of any one material. Illustrations of the quality of the bridge materials are included on Sheet L1-02 of the Concept Plan, and the Pedestrian Bridge shall conform to the architectural
character and quality of such images; however, the Owner reserves the right to modify the design based on final architecture and engineering. Said Pedestrian Bridge shall be bonded
prior to the approval of the first site plan for Building E and constructed prior to the issuance of the 37th occupancy permit in Building D. The Pedestrian Bridge shall be maintained
by the POA established pursuant to Proffer 9. iii. Town Branch Park. The Owner will designate the approximately 1.72-acre area along Town Branch between Harrison Street and the Ours
Overlook for passive recreation purposes (the “Town Branch Park”). The Town Branch Park will be used for passive recreation purposes in addition to the Pedestrian Bridge described in
Proffer 18.b.ii. The Town Branch Park will be conveyed to the Town within 180 days following completion of the Pedestrian Bridge. c. Common Green. As depicted on Sheet L1-04 of the
Concept Plan, the Owner shall install a public park (the “Common Green”) on the Property in the median of the proposed Madison Court extension, which may include active recreation elements,
hardscape elements, landscaping, seating areas, interpretive signage, play areas, and public art/sculptural elements. The Common Green shall be bonded prior to the approval of the first
site plan for any Townhouse or Stacked Townhouse units on the Property, shall be available for use prior to the issuance of the 50th occupancy permit for any Townhouse or Stacked Townhouse
units on the Property. d. Entry Park. As depicted on Sheet L1-05 of the Concept Plan, the Owner will install an urban park (the “Entry Park”) at the intersection of Fairfax Street
and Catoctin Circle proximate to Building E. The Entry Park may include landscaping, shade structures, bus shelter, seating areas, masonry walls, and wayfinding signage. The Entry Park
shall be bonded prior to the approval of the first site plan for Building E, and shall be open for public use prior to the approval of the 400th occupancy residential permit on the
Property. e. Temporary Park. In the event construction has not been completed on the Ours Overlook, established pursuant to Proffer 18.b.i prior to issuance of the 450th occupancy
permit on the Property, the Owner shall install a minimum 7,500-square foot temporary park (the “Temporary Park”) on the Property as shown on Sheet C13-01A of the Concept Plan. Said
Temporary Park shall be graded and located on natural turf and/or synthetic all-weather turf, and shall include landscaping, seating, signage, benches, tables, a shade element, lawn
games, and outdoor recreational 211 Item a. TLZM 2019-0001 Page 9 amenities. The Temporary Park shall remain open and available to public use until completion of the Ours Overlook.
19. Private Park/Amenity Spaces. In addition to the open spaces described in Proffer 18, the Owner will provide on-site recreational facilities/amenities for future residents of the
Multiple-Family buildings on the Property. Such facilities shall include a minimum of three of the following amenities: a. One or more media/entertainment centers outfitted with televisions,
seating areas, and stereo/sound equipment; b. One or more exterior recreational areas, which may include fitness areas, outdoor furniture, outdoor kitchen/grills, fire pits, pedestrian-scaled
lighting, specialty landscaping, lawn areas, tot lots, playgrounds, Zen gardens, and outdoor adult exercise areas; c. One or more courtyard areas, which may be located on the rooftop
of the buildings, the top deck of parking garages, or in open areas, and may include pool and related bathhouse facilities, seating areas, landscaping, and hardscape areas; d. One
or more collaborative interior work spaces and meeting rooms for work-athome residents outside of individual units; e. One or more club rooms and/or entertainment centers for resident
gatherings; and f. One or more fitness centers furnished with exercise equipment that may include, but not be limited to, stationary bikes, treadmills, weight training equipment with
weight machines and free weights, but not necessarily staffed. The specific design of these facilities/amenities will be determined prior to issuance of the building permit for each
Multiple-Family building, and such facilities/amenities will be constructed concurrent with the development of each Multiple-Family building. Such facilities/amenities shall be installed
prior to the issuance of the occupancy permit for 50 percent of the number units in each particular Multiple-Family building. TRANSPORTATION 20. Parking. Upon buildout of the Property
as contemplated by this Application, parking will be provided as tabulated on Sheets C2-02 and C2-03 of the Concept Plan. The Owner may provide more or less parking than required by
the Zoning Ordinance for the use(s) established in any building without the need for an amendment to this Application, 212 Item a. TLZM 2019-0001 Page 10 provided that if the
Owner reduces the parking supply pursuant to an approved parking reduction study and/or shared parking agreement, the rates will be in conformance therewith as approved by the Town.
a. Smart Parking Measures. The Owner shall install, within each structured garage in which parking is made available to the public, so-called “smart parking” technology to effectively
communicate, in real time, the availability of publicly-accessible parking within each garage in order to direct drivers to available spaces. Such technology may include, but not be
limited to, wireless or hard-wired sensors, cameras, electronic messaging signs, mobile parking applications, and cameras. b. Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure. The Owner
shall install a minimum of 20 electric vehicle (“EV”) charging stations which shall be installed proportionally in the parking garages for Buildings A, B, and E. Nothing contained in
this proffer will preclude the Owner from providing additional EV charging stations if desired. The Owner shall offer initial purchasers of Townhouses and Stacked Townhouses the option,
at the purchaser’s cost, to install an EV charging station in their respective garages. In the event that such initial purchasers do not opt to have an EV charging station installed
in their garages during initial construction, all electrical panels must be sized to accommodate future installations in order to allow subsequent purchasers to more readily install
an EV charging station. c. Parking For One Bedrooms. Notwithstanding that depicted on the Concept Plan or any parking modification which may be granted by the Town Council, the Owner
shall apply a rate of 1.25 parking spaces per dwelling unit for one-bedroom units on the Property. In the event of any conflict or inconsistency between this Proffer 20 and the Concept
Plan or any zoning modification, the requirements set forth in this Proffer 20 shall prevail. 20.21. On-Street Parking. On-street parking may be provided on all streets depicted on
the Concept Plan to meet the parking requirements of the Zoning Ordinance, so long as such spaces are striped and are provided in accordance with the Town of Leesburg Design & Construction
Standards Manual (“DCSM”) standards including, but not limited to, the provision of adequate space for turnarounds, subject to approval of any necessary waivers and/or modifications
and as may be adjusted at the time of site plan approval. Parking on private streets may be restricted through appropriate signage or such other means as determined appropriate by the
Owner. 21.22. Interim Use of Existing Surface Parking Lots. Until removal of existing surface parking is required for buildout of the Property as contemplated by these Proffers or
the Concept Plan, the Owner may use existing surface parking lots anywhere on the Property on an interim 213 Item a. TLZM 2019-0001 Page 11 basis to meet leasing requirements
or parking demand for the Existing Development on the Property. 22.23. Pedestrian Connections. Pedestrian connectivity will be provided throughout the Property generally consistent
with the concepts shown on the “Pedestrian Circulation Plan” on Sheet L2-01 of the Concept Plan and will be consistent with the Zoning Ordinance and the DCSM requirements. All pedestrian
connections will be constructed concurrently with adjacent buildings. 23.24. Madison House Pedestrian Connection. Subject to the Owner obtaining all necessary construction easements
from the owner of Loudoun County PIN #231-18-4473 (the “Madison House Property”) prior to, or concurrent with approval of the first site plan for residential development for Phase 1
of the Property, and as depicted on Sheet C5-01 of the Concept Plan, the Owner shall construct a pedestrian ramp connecting the Property to the existing sidewalk system on the Madison
House Property so as to provide an interparcel pedestrian connection between the two parcels. 24.25. Private Streets. The proposed private internal streets will be developed as reflected
on Sheets C5-01, C5-02, and C5-03 of the Concept Plan, and will be constructed of materials and depth of pavement consistent with that required by the DCSM, or with modified standards
as may be approved by the Town. The POA shall be responsible for the maintenance of all private streets on the Property, and notification to this effect shall be provided in all sales
materials. A public access easement in a form acceptable to the Town Attorney will be recorded over all private streets and associated sidewalks internal to the development at the time
of record plat recordation. Such public access easement shall specifically permit Town vehicles and equipment to traverse such private streets to access the limits of any Town-maintained
right-of-ways. 25.26. Catoctin Circle Intersection Improvements. The Owner shall, subject to Town approval and at no cost to the Town, install improvements (the “Catoctin Circle Intersection
Improvements”) at the intersection of High Street and Catoctin Circle, as depicted on Sheet C5-02 of the Concept Plan. Said Catoctin Circle Intersection Improvements shall, subject
to Town approval, include a traffic signal, raised speed table with painted and stamped asphalt, pedestrian crosswalks, Americans With Disabilities Act-accessible curb ramps, and the
installation of pedestrian activated-countdown signal heads (or reasonable alternative if requested by the Town). Said improvements shall be bonded prior to approval of the first site
plan for the Property and installed, operational, and available for use, prior to the issuance of the first residential dwelling occupancy permit in Building A. The Owner shall have
no obligation to install any component of the Catoctin Circle Intersection Improvements in the event such component(s) are not authorized for installation by the Town prior to, or concurrent
with, approval of the first site plan for the Property. 214 Item a. TLZM 2019-0001 Page 12 26.27. Bus Shelter. The Owner shall install a covered bus shelter on the Property
in the general location depicted on Sheet C5-03 of the Concept Plan; provided, however, that the bus shelter’s location may be modified in coordination with the Town and subject to
Zoning Administrator approval prior to approval of the first site plan for the Property. Said bus shelter shall be bonded prior to the approval of the first site plan for Building E,
and shall be open for public use prior to the approval of the occupancy permit for the 400th residential dwelling unit on the Property. 27.28. Bicycle Infrastructure. The Owner shall,
in accordance with § 7.10.5.B of the Zoning Ordinance, provide a minimum of seven exterior bicycle parking areas on the Property, each of which shall accommodate a minimum of six bicycles
in the general locations depicted on Sheets L4-01, L4-02, and L4-03 of the Concept Plan. The Owner may alter the final location of the bicycle parking areas with each site plan to ensure
accessibility and usefulness of said bicycle parking areas provided any such modifications are found to be a minor modification in accordance with Proffer 6 and with concurrence of
the Zoning Administrator. Said bicycle parking areas shall be required to be maintained by the POA. Installation of the bicycle parking areas will be concurrent with development activity
on the Property and installed when adjacent buildings are completed. 28.29. Offsite Transportation Contribution. The Owner shall, prior to the issuance of the first occupancy permit
in Buildings A, B, C, D, and E, make a one-time offsite transportation contribution to the Town in the amount of $105,500.00, for a total combined contribution of $527,501.00. Said
contribution shall be used at the discretion of the Town to offset any transportation impacts of the proposed development in the general vicinity of the Property. 29.30. Construction
Traffic Management. The Owner will prepare and implement a construction congestion management plan during construction of each phase of redevelopment, so as to provide safe and efficient
pedestrian and vehicle circulation at all times on the Property and on the public roadways and sidewalks adjoining the Property. This management plan will identify anticipated construction
entrances, construction staging areas, construction vehicle routes, and procedures for coordination with the Town concerning construction material deliveries, lane or street closures,
and/or other construction related activities to minimize disturbance on the surrounding street and sidewalk network. ENVIRONMENTAL 30.31. Landscape Plan. The Owner will implement
the landscape plan for the Property shown on Sheets L4-01, L4-02, L4-03, and L4-05 of the Concept Plan, which illustrate the plantings, open space, courtyards, tree buffers, and other
features to be provided on the Property. 31.32. Energy Conservation. All Townhouse and Stacked Townhouse dwelling units on the Property shall be designed and constructed as ENERGY
STAR Version 3® or Home 215 Item a. TLZM 2019-0001 Page 13 Energy Rating System (“HERS”) qualified homes with a maximum rating of 90. With the submission of a zoning permit
for each building, the Owner shall provide certification that the construction documents have been reviewed by a qualified Home Energy Rater, and that the building meets ENERGY STAR
Version 3® or HERS standards with a maximum rating of 90. Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit, a “wet” ENERGY STAR Version 3® or HERS label must be verified at each dwelling
unit’s electrical panel and a copy of the Home Energy Rating report shall be provided by the Home Energy Rater. The Home Energy Rating report shall include the unit address, builder’s
name, Rater’s name and date of verification. 32.33. Lighting. In an effort to minimize nighttime light pollution from the Property, all on-site outdoor and parking garage lighting
provided on the Property will be provided as depicted on Sheet L3-00 of the Concept Plan and shall comply with § 12.11 et seq. of the Zoning Ordinance. All street lighting, as well
as light poles in surface parking lots and buildingmounted security lighting, shall use shielded full cut-off fixtures and be directed inward and downward. The fixture shown on L3-00
is an example of the quality of the fixture but may be changed during final design so long as it meets the criteria of these Proffers. Nothing contained in this proffer shall preclude
the up-lighting, accent lighting, or backlighting of signage, entrance features, and related landscaping, provided such lighting does not result in traffic safety hazards to the extent
allowable by the Zoning Ordinance. 33.34. Mechanical System Consolidation. The Owner shall aggregate rooftop mechanical systems on each Multiple-Family building to the greatest extent
possible. MISCELLANEOUS 34.35. Fire & Rescue. a. Fire Marshal Coordination. The Owner has coordinated with the Loudoun County Fire Marshal regarding the site design and layout
of the Property shown on the Concept Plan. Notwithstanding such coordination, if it is determined during site plan review that elements of the Concept Plan including, but not limited
to, streetscape and building, tree plantings, open space, courtyards, tree buffers, and tree preservation areas, require adjustment to allow for required emergency vehicle access or
are necessary to respond to subsequent comments from the Fire Marshal, the Owner may be permitted to relocate, replace, or modify such conflicting elements without the need for an amendment
to this Application, provided any such modifications are found to be a minor modification in accordance with Proffer 6 and with concurrence of the Zoning Administrator. b. Contribution
for Residential Uses. The Owner shall, prior to the approval of the occupancy permit for each residential dwelling unit on the Property, make a one216 Item a. TLZM 2019-0001 Page
14 time cash contribution to the Town in the amount of $100.00 per residential dwelling unit for distribution to the fire and rescue companies providing primary service to the
Property. This contribution shall be divided equally between those fire and rescue companies that primarily serve the Property. c. Contribution for Commercial Uses. The Owner shall,
prior to the issuance of each zoning permit for commercial uses on the Property, make a one-time cash contribution to the Town of $0.10 per gross square foot of commercial use on the
Property for distribution to the fire and rescue companies providing primary service to the Property. Said contribution shall be divided equally between the fire and rescue companies
with primary responsibility for servicing the Property. 35.36. School Capital Facilities Contribution. In accordance with Town Council Resolution 2015105, the Owner shall provide,
upon issuance of each occupancy permit for a dwelling unit, a one-time cash contribution in the amount of $5,100.23 per each Multiple-Family dwelling unit (Buildings A, D and E), $6,652.48
per each Stacked Townhouse dwelling unit, and $11,974.46 for each Townhouse dwelling unit, which shall be used for capital projects for public schools serving the Town of Leesburg.
36.37. Construction Screening. During periods of construction between demolition of any existing buildings and substantial completion of any replacement buildings, streets, or open
space amenities, the Owner shall install attractive temporary construction fencing, which may include public art, signage, marketing, or wayfinding elements in accordance with Article
15 of the Zoning Ordinance. With the exception of those areas used for construction staging, the Owner shall grade and seed areas on the Property where existing improvements are removed
to accommodate a portion of the proposed development, and are not scheduled to commence construction within 18 months. 37.38. Waivers and Modifications. Approval of this Application
does not express or imply any waiver or modification of the requirements set forth in the Subdivision and Land Development Regulations, the Zoning Ordinance, or the DCSM, except as
expressly set forth herein or as approved with the Zoning Ordinance Modifications, and all final plats, Concept Plans, and construction plans shall remain subject to these applicable
Town regulations. 38.39. Escalation Clause. All monetary contribution proffers shall escalate on a yearly basis beginning one year from the date of approval of the first site plan
containing residential buildings and/or mixed use buildings or the first record plat containing such buildings, whichever occurs first in time, and which shall change effective each
January 1 thereafter, based on the Consumer Price Index for the Washington Metropolitan Statistical Area. 217 Item a. TLZM 2019-0001 Page 15 39.40. Construction. The improvements
and commitments described in these Proffers shall be constructed concurrently with adjacent development unless otherwise specified. Should construction and/or installation of any of
the improvements described herein be determined by the Zoning Administrator (including, but not limited to, healthcare pandemic, construction schedules, availability of financing, weather
delays, duration of approval process, market conditions, inability to secure necessary easements, licenses, healthcare emergencies, or permission from other private or public entities
for utility relocations and traffic improvements, etc.), to have been delayed due to circumstances beyond the Owner’s control, later dates for compliance may be permitted as determined
appropriate by the Zoning Administrator and, if necessary, subject to a proffer bond to compel completion of the overdue commitment. 40.41. Successors and Assigns. These proffers
will bind and inure to the benefit of the Owner and its successors and assigns. Each reference to “Owner” in these Proffers will include within its meaning and will be binding upon
the Owner’s successor(s)-in-interest and/or developer(s) of the site or any portion of the site. 41.42. Severability/Future Applications. Any portion of the Property may be the subject
of a rezoning, special exception, comprehensive sign plan, variance, concept plan amendment, or other zoning action without the joinder and/or consent of the Owner(s)/property owner(s)
of the other land area(s), provided that such application complies with the Zoning Ordinance and § 15.2-2302 of the Code of Virginia, as applicable. Previously-approved proffered conditions
or development conditions applicable to a particular portion of the Property that are not the subject of such an application will remain in full force and effect. The undersigned hereby
warrants that all Owners with any legal interest in the Property have signed this Proffer statement, that no signature from any additional party is necessary for these Proffers to be
binding and enforceable in accordance with their terms, that the undersigned has full authority to bind the Property to these conditions, and that the Proffers are entered into voluntarily.
[ SIGNATURE ON FOLLOWING PAGE ] 218 Item a. TLZM 2019-0001 Page 16 Owner/Title Owner of Loudoun County PIN ##231-17-9342, 23118-0470, 231-18-0311, 231-17-7713, 23247-9494,
231-18-5606, and 232-48-2685 VIRGINIA VILLAGE HOLDINGS, LLC a Virginia Limited Liability Company ____________________________ By: Brian J. Cullen Its: ________________ State of
___________________________ City/County of _____________________ to wit: I, ___________________________, a Notary Public in and for the state and city/county aforesaid, do hereby
certify that Brian J. Cullen, whose name is signed to the foregoing instrument, personally appeared before me and has this day acknowledged that he executed the foregoing proffers with
the full power and authority to do so. Given under my hand this _______ day of , 2022. Notary Public My Commission Expires: ______________________ 219 Item a. TLZM 2019-0001
Page 17 Exhibit A Concept Plan 220 Item a. 07/03/19 ΡΒ≅Κ∆9 ΡΓ∆∆Σ ΕΗΚ∆ Μν− Οκµµδθρ ∆µφηµδδθρ Κµχρβοδ ≅θβγησδβσρ Κµχ Ρτθυδξνθρ Τθαµ+ Κσχ− ϖϖϖ−τθαµ,κσχ−βνλ Σδκ− 6/2−531−7/7/
≅µµµχκδ+ Υηθφηµη 11//2 6601 Κησσκδ Θηυδθ Στθµοηϕδ TM ΟΚ≅Μ Χ≅Σ∆ No.DATEDESCRIPTION Θ∆ΥΗΡΗΝΜΡ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΥΗΚΚ≅Φ∆ ΣΝςΜ ΝΕ Κ∆∆ΡΑΤΘΦ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΨΟ,130/ ΨΝΜΗΜΦ Λ≅Ο ≅Λ∆ΜΧΛ∆ΜΣ Ε ∆ Μ Η Φ Μν−/11/37
Χ≅ΥΗΧ Σ− Λβ∆ΚΓ≅Μ∆Ξ Γ Ν ς Μ Ν Λ Λ Κ ≅ Σ ∆ Β Ο Θ Ν Μ Η Υ Ε Ν Η Θ Φ Η Θ ≅ ∆ ∆ ≅ Ρ Ν Μ Η Ρ ∆ Μ Κ 10/27/2021 07/03/19FIRST SUBMISSION 1 02/27/20 02/27/20SECOND SUBMISSION 2 09/25/20 09/25/20THIRD
SUBMISSION 3 03/12/21 03/12/21FOURTH SUBMISSION 4 06/29/21 06/29/21FIFTH SUBMISSION 5 10/27/21FINAL PLANNING COMMISSION SET 6 10/27/21 ΒΝΥ∆Θ ΡΓ∆∆Σ Β0,/0 Μ.≅ ≅ΟΟΚΗΒ≅ΜΣ ΣΘ≅ΕΕΗΒ ∆ΜΦΗΜ∆∆Θ
Β0,/0 ΒΝΥ∆Θ ΡΓ∆∆Σ ΒΗΥΗΚ ∆ΜΦΗΜ∆∆Θ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΥΗΚΚ≅Φ∆ ΨΝΜΗΜΦ Λ≅Ο ≅Λ∆ΜΧΛ∆ΜΣ ΣΚΨΛ,1/08,///0 ΣΚΣ≅,1/08,///0 ΣΚΡ∆,1/1/,///3 ΣΝςΜ ΝΕ Κ∆∆ΡΑΤΘΦ+ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ Κ≅ΜΧ ΤΡ∆ ≅ΣΣΝΘΜ∆Ξ 1 EAST MARKET STREET
SUITE 300 LEESBURG, VIRGINIA 20176 (703) 737-3633 44031 PIPELINE PLAZA SUITE 100 ASHBURN, VIRGINIA 20147 571-223-0001 Κ≅ΜΧΡΒ≅Ο∆ ≅ΘΒΓΗΣ∆ΒΣ ΡΓ∆∆Σ ΗΜΧ∆Ω ΟΘΝΙ∆ΒΣ ≅ΘΒΓΗΣ∆ΒΣ Β1,/0 Φ∆Μ∆Θ≅Κ
ΜΝΣ∆Ρ ≅ΜΧ Χ∆Σ≅ΗΚΡ Β1,/1 Φ∆Μ∆Θ≅Κ ΜΝΣ∆Ρ ≅ΜΧ Χ∆Σ≅ΗΚΡ Β5,/0 ΒΝΜΒ∆ΟΣ ΤΣΗΚΗΣΞ ΟΚ≅Μ Β7,/0 ΝΟ∆Μ ΡΟ≅Β∆ ∆ΩΓΗΑΗΣ , Θ∆ΛΝΥ∆Χ Β0/,/0 ΡςΛ Λ≅Ο ≅ΜΧ ΒΝΛΟΤΣ≅ΣΗΝΜΡ ΨΝΜΗΜΦ ΛΝΧΗΕΗΒ≅ΣΗΝΜΡ Α≅Ρ∆ Β8,/0 Θ∆ΨΝΜΗΜΦ
ΟΚ≅Σ ΨΝΜΗΜΦ ΛΝΧΗΕΗΒ≅ΣΗΝΜΡ ΚΝΒ≅ΣΗΝΜ Λ≅Ο Α≅Ρ∆ ≅0,/0 ΒΝΜΒ∆ΟΣΤ≅Κ ΡΣΘ∆∆ΣΡΒ≅Ο∆ 1/& ΣΓ ΣΝΣ≅Κ ΜΤΛΑ∆Θ ΝΕ ΡΓ∆∆ΣΡ < 88 Β01,/0 Β00,/1 Β00,/0 Β4,/2 ΒΝΜΒ∆ΟΣ ΟΚ≅Μ Β4,/3 ΒΝΜΒ∆ΟΣ ΟΚ≅Μ Β4,/1 ΒΝΜΒ∆ΟΣ
ΟΚ≅Μ Β5,/1 ΒΝΜΒ∆ΟΣ ΤΣΗΚΗΣΞ ΟΚ≅Μ Β6,/0 ΒΝΜΒ∆ΟΣΤ≅Κ ΦΘ≅ΧΗΜΦ ΟΚ≅Μ Β5,/3 ΒΝΜΒ∆ΟΣ ΤΣΗΚΗΣΞ ΟΚ≅Μ Β5,/2 ΒΝΜΒ∆ΟΣ ΤΣΗΚΗΣΞ ΟΚ≅Μ Β8,/2 ΑΛΟ ΒΝΛΟΤΣ≅ΣΗΝΜΡ Β8,/1 ΑΛΟ ΒΝΛΟΤΣ≅ΣΗΝΜΡ Β0/,/2 ΡςΛ ΒΝΛΟΤΣ≅ΣΗΝΜΡ
Β0/,/1 ΡςΛ ΒΝΛΟΤΣ≅ΣΗΝΜΡ ΑΛΟ Λ≅Ο % ΒΝΛΟΤΣ≅ΣΗΝΜΡ Β2,/0 ∆ΩΗΡΣΗΜΦ ΒΝΜΧΗΣΗΝΜΡ Β3,/0 ΝΥ∆ΘΥΗ∆ς Β4,/0 ΒΝΜΒ∆ΟΣ ΟΚ≅Μ Β6,/1 ΒΝΜΒ∆ΟΣΤ≅Κ ΦΘ≅ΧΗΜΦ ΟΚ≅Μ Β6,/2 ΒΝΜΒ∆ΟΣΤ≅Κ ΦΘ≅ΧΗΜΦ ΟΚ≅Μ Β6,/3 ΒΝΜΒ∆ΟΣΤ≅Κ
ΦΘ≅ΧΗΜΦ ΟΚ≅Μ ΟΓ≅Ρ∆ 0 ΤΣΗΚΗΣΞ ΟΚ≅ΜΒ02,/0 ΡΤ,3/ ΣΤΘΜΗΜΦ ΛΝΥ∆Λ∆ΜΣ ΟΚ≅ΜΒ03,/0 ΡΤ,2/ ΣΤΘΜΗΜΦ ΛΝΥ∆Λ∆ΜΣ ΟΚ≅ΜΒ03,/2 ∆Λ∆ΘΦ∆ΜΒΞ ≅ΒΒ∆ΡΡ ΟΚ≅ΜΒ04,/0 ΣΝςΜΓΝΤΡ∆ ≅ΘΒΓΗΣ∆ΒΣ 3914 CENTREVILLE ROAD SUITE
330 CHANTILLY, VIRGINIA 20151 (703) 787-9595 1200 G STREET NW SUITE 250 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005 (202) 682-2822 8521 LEESBURG PIKE SUITE 700 VIENNA, VIRGINIA 22182 (571) 830-1800 200
SOUTH PEYTON STREET ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA 22314 (703) 549-7784 7712 LITTLE RIVER TURNPIKE ANNANDALE, VIRGINIA 22003 (703) 642-8080 ΣΘ∆∆ ΗΜΥ∆ΜΣΝΘΞ % ΒΝΜΧΗΣΗΝΜ ≅Μ≅ΚΞΡΗΡ , ΣΘ∆∆ Λ≅Μ≅Φ∆Λ∆ΜΣ
Θ∆ΟΝΘΣΒ05,/0 ΣΘ∆∆ ΗΜΥ∆ΜΣΝΘΞ % ΒΝΜΧΗΣΗΝΜ ≅Μ≅ΚΞΡΗΡ , ΣΘ∆∆ Λ≅Μ≅Φ∆Λ∆ΜΣ Θ∆ΟΝΘΣΒ05,/1 ΣΘ∆∆ ΗΜΥ∆ΜΣΝΘΞ % ΒΝΜΧΗΣΗΝΜ ≅Μ≅ΚΞΡΗΡ , ΣΘ∆∆ Λ≅Μ≅ΦΛ∆ΜΣ Θ∆ΟΝΘΣΒ05,/5 ΡΤ,2/ ΣΤΘΜΗΜΦ ΛΝΥ∆Λ∆ΜΣ ΟΚ≅ΜΒ03,/3 ΣΘ∆∆
ΗΜΥ∆ΜΣΝΘΞ % ΒΝΜΧΗΣΗΝΜ ≅Μ≅ΚΞΡΗΡ , ΣΘ∆∆ Λ≅Μ≅Φ∆Λ∆ΜΣ Θ∆ΟΝΘΣΒ05,/2 ΣΘ∆∆ ΗΜΥ∆ΜΣΝΘΞ % ΒΝΜΧΗΣΗΝΜ ≅Μ≅ΚΞΡΗΡ , ΣΘ∆∆ Λ≅Μ≅Φ∆Λ∆ΜΣ Θ∆ΟΝΘΣΒ05,/3 ΣΘ∆∆ ΗΜΥ∆ΜΣΝΘΞ % ΒΝΜΧΗΣΗΝΜ ≅Μ≅ΚΞΡΗΡ , ΣΘ∆∆ Λ≅Μ≅Φ∆Λ∆ΜΣ
Θ∆ΟΝΘΣΒ05,/4 Κ3,00 Κ3,01 Κ3,02 Κ4,/1 Κ4,/2 Κ4,/3 Κ4,/4 Κ4,/5 Κ5,/0 ΡΗΦΓΣ ΧΗΡΣ≅ΜΒ∆ ΟΚ≅Μ ≅ΜΧ ΟΘΝΕΗΚ∆ΡΒ06,/0 ΡΗΦΓΣ ΧΗΡΣ≅ΜΒ∆ ΟΚ≅Μ ≅ΜΧ ΟΘΝΕΗΚ∆ΡΒ06,/1 ΡΗΦΓΣ ΧΗΡΣ≅ΜΒ∆ ΟΚ≅Μ ≅ΜΧ ΟΘΝΕΗΚ∆ΡΒ06,/2
Κ≅ΜΧΡΒ≅Ο∆ ΡΒΓ∆ΧΤΚ∆ % ΣΘ∆∆ Β≅ΚΒΤΚ≅ΣΗΝΜΡ ΑΤΕΕ∆Θ Ξ≅ΘΧ Β≅ΚΒΤΚ≅ΣΗΝΜΡ ΟΚ≅ΜΣΗΜΦ Χ∆Σ≅ΗΚΡ ΑΝΤΜΧ≅ΘΞ Ρ∆ΒΣΗΝΜΡ ΑΝΤΜΧ≅ΘΞ Ρ∆ΒΣΗΝΜΡ ΑΝΤΜΧ≅ΘΞ Ρ∆ΒΣΗΝΜΡ ΑΝΤΜΧ≅ΘΞ Ρ∆ΒΣΗΝΜΡ Κ/,/0 Κ/,/1 Κ/,/2 Κ/,/3 Κ0,/0
Κ0,/1 Κ0,/2 Κ0,/3 Κ0,/4 Κ0,/5 Κ0,/6 Κ1,/0 Κ1,/1 Κ1,/2 Κ1,/3 Κ2,// Κ3,/0 Κ3,/1 Κ3,/2 Κ3,/3 ΒΝΜΣ∆ΩΣ ΟΚ≅Μ ΒΝΜΣ∆ΩΣΤ≅Κ ΒΝΜΒ∆ΟΣ ΗΚΚΤΡΣΘ≅ΣΗΥ∆ ΟΚ≅Μ ΑΗΘΧΡ ∆Ξ∆ ΥΗ∆ςΡ Ο≅ΘϑΡ ΝΥ∆ΘΥΗ∆ς Ο≅Θϑ ∆ΜΚ≅ΘΦ∆Λ∆ΜΣ
, ΝΤΘΡ ΝΥ∆ΘΚΝΝϑ Ο≅Θϑ ∆ΜΚ≅ΘΦ∆Λ∆ΜΣ , ΓΗΦΓ ΡΣΘ∆∆Σ Ο≅Θϑ Ο≅Θϑ ∆ΜΚ≅ΘΦ∆Λ∆ΜΣ , ΒΝΛΛΝΜ ΦΘ∆∆Μ Ο≅Θϑ ∆ΜΚ≅ΘΦ∆Λ∆ΜΣ , ∆ΜΣΘΞ Ο≅Θϑ ΝΟ∆Μ ΡΟ≅Β∆ Β≅ΚΒΤΚ≅ΣΗΝΜΡ ΝΟ∆Μ ΡΟ≅Β∆ ΡΓ≅Χ∆ Β≅ΚΒΡ Ο∆Χ∆ΡΣΘΗ≅Μ ΒΗΘΒΤΚ≅ΣΗΝΜ
ΡΣΘ∆∆ΣΡΒ≅Ο∆ Ρ∆ΒΣΗΝΜΡ ΡΣΘ∆∆ΣΡΒ≅Ο∆ Ρ∆ΒΣΗΝΜΡ ΡΣΘ∆∆ΣΡΒ≅Ο∆ Ρ∆ΒΣΗΝΜΡ ΚΗΦΓΣΗΜΦ ΟΚ≅Μ Κ≅ΜΧΡΒ≅Ο∆ ΟΚ≅Μ Κ≅ΜΧΡΒ≅Ο∆ ΟΚ≅Μ Κ≅ΜΧΡΒ≅Ο∆ ΟΚ≅Μ ≅0,/1 ΒΝΜΒ∆ΟΣΤ≅Κ ΡΣΘ∆∆ΣΡΒ≅Ο∆ 1/& ΣΓ ≅0,/2 ΒΝΜΒ∆ΟΣΤ≅Κ ΡΣΘ∆∆ΣΡΒ≅Ο∆
ΡΣ≅Βϑ∆Χ ΣΓ ≅0,/3 ΒΝΜΒ∆ΟΣΤ≅Κ ΡΣΘ∆∆ΣΡΒ≅Ο∆ ΡΣ≅Βϑ∆Χ ΣΓ ≅0,/4 ΑΝΤΜΧ≅ΘΞ Ρ∆ΒΣΗΝΜΡ Χ∆Σ≅ΗΚΡ ∗ ΒΓ≅Θ≅ΒΣ∆Θ ΗΛ≅Φ∆ΘΞ Β02,/1 ΟΓ≅ΡΗΜΦ ΟΚ≅Μ Κ≅ΜΧΡΒ≅Ο∆ ΟΚ≅Μ ΡΟ∆ΒΗ≅Κ ∆ΩΒ∆ΟΣΗΝΜΒ07,/0 ΒΝΜΒ∆ΟΣΤ≅Κ ΡΣΘ∆∆ΣΡΒ≅Ο∆
ΡΣ≅Βϑ∆Χ ΣΓ ΡΤ,3/ ΣΤΘΜΗΜΦ ΛΝΥ∆Λ∆ΜΣ ΟΚ≅ΜΒ03,/1 ΧΒΡΛ ΛΝΧΗΕΗΒ≅ΣΗΝΜΡ ΚΗΡΣ ≅1,/0 ΑΤΗΚΧΗΜΦ ≅ ∆Κ∆Υ≅ΣΗΝΜΡ ≅2,/0 ΑΤΗΚΧΗΜΦ Α ∆Κ∆Υ≅ΣΗΝΜΡ ≅3,/0 ΑΤΗΚΧΗΜΦ Β ∆Κ∆Υ≅ΣΗΝΜΡ ≅4,/0 ΑΤΗΚΧΗΜΦ Χ ∆Κ∆Υ≅ΣΗΝΜΡ
≅6,/0 ΑΤΗΚΧΗΜΦ Ε ∆Κ∆Υ≅ΣΗΝΜΡ ≅5,/1 ΑΤΗΚΧΗΜΦ ∆ ∆Κ∆Υ≅ΣΗΝΜΡ ≅1,/1 ΑΤΗΚΧΗΜΦ ≅ ∆Κ∆Υ≅ΣΗΝΜΡ ≅1,/3 ΑΤΗΚΧΗΜΦ ≅ Ο∆ΘΡΟ∆ΒΣΗΥ∆Ρ ≅2,/1 ΑΤΗΚΧΗΜΦ Α Ο∆ΘΡΟ∆ΒΣΗΥ∆Ρ ≅3,/1 ΑΤΗΚΧΗΜΦ Β Ο∆ΘΡΟ∆ΒΣΗΥ∆Ρ ≅4,/1 ΑΤΗΚΧΗΜΦ
Χ Ο∆ΘΡΟ∆ΒΣΗΥ∆Ρ ≅5,/0 ΑΤΗΚΧΗΜΦ ∆ ∆Κ∆Υ≅ΣΗΝΜΡ ≅5,/2 ΑΤΗΚΧΗΜΦ ∆ Ο∆ΘΡΟ∆ΒΣΗΥ∆Ρ ≅6,/1 ΑΤΗΚΧΗΜΦ Ε Ο∆ΘΡΟ∆ΒΣΗΥ∆Ρ ≅7,/0 ΦΘΝΤΜΧ Κ∆Υ∆Κ ΚΝ≅ΧΗΜΦ Ο≅ΘϑΗΜΦ ≅7,/1 ΡΣΘΤΒΣΤΘ∆Χ Ο≅ΘϑΗΜΦ ΟΚ≅ΜΡ ≅7,/2 ΡΣΘΤΒΣΤΘ∆Χ
Ο≅ΘϑΗΜΦ ΟΚ≅ΜΡ ≅7,/3 ΡΣΘΤΒΣΤΘ∆Χ Ο≅ΘϑΗΜΦ ΟΚ≅ΜΡ ≅1,/2 ΑΤΗΚΧΗΜΦ ≅ Ο≅ΘϑΗΜΦ ΡΒΘ∆∆ΜΗΜΦ ΝΟΣΗΝΜΡ Β1,/2 Ο≅ΘϑΗΜΦ Σ≅ΑΤΚ≅ΣΗΝΜΡ ΟΓ≅Ρ∆ 1 ΗΜΕΘ≅ΡΣΘΤΒΣΤΘ∆ ΟΚ≅ΜΒ02,/0≅ 221 Item a. 07/03/19 ΡΒ≅Κ∆9 ΡΓ∆∆Σ
ΕΗΚ∆ Μν− Οκµµδθρ ∆µφηµδδθρ Κµχρβοδ ≅θβγησδβσρ Κµχ Ρτθυδξνθρ Τθαµ+ Κσχ− ϖϖϖ−τθαµ,κσχ−βνλ Σδκ− 6/2−531−7/7/ ≅µµµχκδ+ Υηθφηµη 11//2 6601 Κησσκδ Θηυδθ Στθµοηϕδ TM ΟΚ≅Μ Χ≅Σ∆
No.DATEDESCRIPTION Θ∆ΥΗΡΗΝΜΡ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΥΗΚΚ≅Φ∆ ΣΝςΜ ΝΕ Κ∆∆ΡΑΤΘΦ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΨΟ,130/ ΨΝΜΗΜΦ Λ≅Ο ≅Λ∆ΜΧΛ∆ΜΣ Ε ∆ Μ Η Φ Μν−/11/37 Χ≅ΥΗΧ Σ− Λβ∆ΚΓ≅Μ∆Ξ Γ Ν ς Μ Ν Λ Λ Κ ≅ Σ ∆ Β Ο Θ Ν Μ Η Υ Ε Ν Η
Θ Φ Η Θ ≅ ∆ ∆ ≅ Ρ Ν Μ Η Ρ ∆ Μ Κ 10/27/2021 07/03/19FIRST SUBMISSION 1 02/27/20 02/27/20SECOND SUBMISSION 2 09/25/20 09/25/20THIRD SUBMISSION 3 03/12/21 03/12/21FOURTH SUBMISSION 4 06/29/21
06/29/21FIFTH SUBMISSION 5 10/27/21FINAL PLANNING COMMISSION SET 6 10/27/21 Φ∆Μ∆Θ≅Κ ΜΝΣ∆Ρ ≅ΜΧ Χ∆Σ≅ΗΚΡ Β1,/0 Μ.≅ 1. THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES ON THIS PLAN ARE IDENTIFIED AS LOUDOUN COUNTY
PIN# 231-18-0470, 231-17-9342, 231-18-0311, 231-18-5606, 232-48-2685, 232-47-9494 AND 231-17-7713. THE PARCELS ARE CURRENTLY ZONED R-22 AND CD, AND HAVE H-2 OVERLAY DISTRICT, FLOODPLAIN
OVERLAY DISTRICT, AND CREEK VALLEY BUFFER OVERLAY DISTRICT ON PORTIONS OF THE SITE. THE TOTAL SITE AREA IS 805,115 SF OR 18.48 AC. 2. ALL REFERENCES HEREIN TO ZONING ORDINANCE SHALL
REFER TO THE TOWN OF LEESBURG ZONING ORDINANCE. 3. THIS APPLICATION PROPOSES A REZONING ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FOR A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT. 4. BOUNDARY INFORMATION IS BASED ON AN ALTA
SURVEY COMPLETED BY PACIULLI SIMMONS & ASSOCIATES DATED JUNE 02, 2017. 5. TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION IS BASED ON A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY PERFORMED BY PACIULLI SIMMONS & ASSOCIATES AND SUPPLEMENTAL
SURVEY OF SOME PHYSICAL FEATURES BY URBAN, LTD DATED JUNE, 2019. 6. THE PROPERTY IS TO BE SERVED BY PUBLIC WATER AND SANITARY SEWER. ALL PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER AND WATER SERVICES WILL
BE DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE TOWN OF LEESBURG STANDARDS. 7. UTILITIES INCLUDING TELEPHONE, ELECTRIC, CABLE AND OTHER UTILITIES WILL BE EXTENDED TO THE SITE. 8. ALL EXISTING
STRUCTURES SHALL BE REMOVED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 9. DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY WILL BE PHASED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PHASING PLAN ON SHEETS C13-01 AND C13-02. 10. MULTIFAMILY USE
INCLUDES APARTMENTS AND/OR CONDOMINIUMS. 11. REMOVED. 12. PRIVATE STREETS AND SURFACE PARKING AREAS NOT WITHIN PRIVATE DRIVEWAYS ARE TO BE LOCATED ON COMMON HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION (HOA)
PROPERTY OR COMMON PROPERTY OWNER ASSOCIATION (POA) PROPERTY AND WILL BE OWNED AND MAINTAINED BY EITHER THE HOA OR POA. 13. DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY SHALL BE IN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE
WITH THIS CONCEPT PLAN WHICH SHALL CONTROL THE USE, LAYOUT AND CONFIGURATION OF THE PROPERTY, WITH REASONABLE ALLOWANCES TO BE MADE FOR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN ALTERATION TO MEET TOWN
ZONING, SUBDIVISION AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. 14. REMOVED. 15. APPROVAL OF THIS REZONING DOES NOT EXPRESS OR IMPLY ANY WAIVER OR MODIFICATION OF THE REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN
THE SUBDIVISIONS AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, THE ZONING ORDINANCE, OR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL, UNLESS SPECIFICALLY REQUESTED WITHIN THE PROPOSED WAIVERS
AND MODIFICATIONS. FINAL PLATS, SITE PLANS AND CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS ARE SUBJECT TO ALL APPLICABLE REGULATIONS. 16. APPROVAL OF THIS APPLICATION DOES NOT RELIEVE THE OWNER(S), DEVELOPER(S),
AGENT(S), SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS FROM COMPLYING WITH OTHER APPLICABLE LOCAL, STATE AND OR FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS. 17. PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF ANY CONSTRUCTION DRAWING OR SITE PLAN APPLICATION
DEPICTING AN ENCROACHMENT INTO THE FLOODPLAIN, FEMA MUST APPROVE A CONDITIONAL LETTER OF MAP REVISION (CLOMR) BASED UPON A FLOODPLAIN STUDY AND FLOODPLAIN ALTERATION STUDY PREPARED
BY THE APPLICANT'S ENGINEER. 18. APPROVAL OF THIS APPLICATION DOES NOT RELIEVE THE OWNER/APPLICANT FROM OBTAINING ALL REQUIRED CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND/OR DEQ PERMITS. COPIES OF THESE
APPROVED PERMITS SHALL BE FURNISHED TO THE TOWN AT THE PRE-CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE. ANY CHANGES TO THE APPROVED ZONING AMENDMENT, SPECIAL EXCEPTION, TOWN PLAN AMENDMENT AND/OR FUTURE
FINAL SITE PLAN REQUIRED TO SATISFY THESE PERMITS SHALL REQUIRE A ZONING DETERMINATION, A NEW REZONING APPLICATION AND/OR FORMAL PLAN REVISIONS TO BE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED BY THE TOWN
PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION. 19. PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE FINAL SITE PLAN FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY THE APPLICANT WILL VERIFY THAT STORM WATER MANAGEMENT AND BEST MANAGEMENT
PRACTICES FOR STORM WATER QUALITY (SWM/BMP) FOR THE SITE ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL TOWN AND STATE CRITERIA INCLUDING THE TOWN OF LEESBURG STORM WATER MASTER PLAN CRITERIA, THE LATEST
VERSIONS OF THE VIRGINIA STORM WATER MANAGEMENT HANDBOOK, AND THE TOWN'S DCSM, WHICHEVER IS MORE RESTRICTIVE AT TIME OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL. 20. THE PRIVATE ROADS WITHIN THE CRESCENT
DESIGN DISTRICT ARE TO BE ADMINISTERED UNDER THE COMMON PARKING COURT REQUIREMENTS WITHIN THE DCSM. 21. GREASE INTERCEPTORS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL RESTAURANT USES AT TIME OF FINAL
SITE PLAN. 22. APPLICATION RESERVES THE RIGHT TO PERFORM EXCAVATION IN THE FLOODPLAIN TO OFFSET ANY IMPACTS FROM THE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE PIERS. THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS WITH THIS APPLICATION
WILL YIELD NO RISE IN THE FLOODPLAIN. ANY EXCAVATION MUST BE DONE IN CONFORMANCE WITH TLZO ARTICLE 13 FLOOD PROTECTION AND ARTICLE 14 CREEK VALLEY BUFFER. 23. ALL SWM/BMP FACILITIES
AND SITE STORM UTILITIES SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE HOA. 24. THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE TLZO SEC. 7.10.5.B BICYCLE FACILITIES SHALL BE MET AT THE TIME OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL. 25. REMOVED
26. ANY OFFSITE EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS OF WAY WILL BE SECURED PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF SITE PLANS OR CONSTRUCTED PLANS THAT PROPOSE OFFSITE DISTURBANCES. 27. ALL GRADING AND DRAINAGE ITEMS
DEPICTED ON THIS PLAN ARE CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND SHALL BE REQUIRED TO MEET ALL DCSM AND STATE DESIGN CRITERIA AT THE TIME OF FINAL SITE PLAN. ANY CHANGES TO THE GRADING AND DRAINAGE
LAYOUT SHOWN ON THIS PLAN WILL NOT HAVE ANY IMPACT ON THE OVERALL SITE LAYOUT. %%UGENERAL NOTES %%USTACKED TOWNHOUSE TYPICAL PARKING DETAIL %%UTOWNHOUSE TYPICAL PARKING DETAIL N.T.S
N.T.S ΡΗΣ∆ ΝςΜ∆ΘΡ Ο≅ΘΒ∆Κ ΟΗΜ ∀ ΝςΜ∆Θ ∆Ω− ΨΝΜΗΜΦ ΤΡ∆ ≅ΧΙ≅Β∆ΜΣ Ο≅ΘΒ∆Κ ΝςΜ∆ΘΡ Ο≅ΘΒ∆Κ ΟΗΜ ∀ ΝςΜ∆Θ ∆Ω− ΨΝΜΗΜΦ ΤΡ∆ 121,36,7764 121,36,7366 ΟΘ∆ΡΗΧ∆ΜΣΗ≅Κ Α≅Μϑ 00 121,36,7/66 0/ 121,36,6768
8 121,36,6270 Κ≅ΦΜΗ≅ΟΟ∆ ΗΛΛΝΑΗΚΗ∆Θ ΚΚΒ+ 7 121,36,6071 6 5 121,36,5274 ςΗΚΚΗ≅ΛΡ Ε≅ΛΗΚΞ Ο≅ΘΣΜ∆ΘΡΓΗΟ4 121,36,4178 ςΗΚΚΗ≅ΛΡ Ε≅ΛΗΚΞ Ο≅ΘΣΜ∆ΘΡΓΗΟ3 121,36,3083 ΓΗΘΧ Φ∆Μ∆Θ≅ΣΗΝΜ ΚΟ2 1 120,06,/3/7
ϑΗΜΦΡ ΒΝΘΜ∆Θ ΟΚ≅Ψ≅ ΚΚΒ 0 120,06,1235 Υ∆ΚΟ≅Θ ΗΜΥ∆ΡΣΛ∆ΜΣ ΗΜΒ ΤΜΗΣ∆Χ ΡΣ≅Σ∆Ρ ΟΝΡΣ≅Κ Ρ∆ΘΥΗΒ∆ Ι Χ Β Β≅ΣΝΒΣΗΜ ΒΗΘΒΚ∆ ΚΚΒ Χ Β Β≅ΣΝΒΣΗΜ ΒΗΘΒΚ∆ ΚΚΒ Κ≅ΦΜΗ≅ΟΟ∆ ΗΛΛΝΑΗΚΗ∆Θ ΚΚΒ ΒΝΛΛ∆ΘΒΗ≅Κ.ΗΜΧΤΡΣ
ΒΝΛΛ∆ΘΒΗ≅Κ.ΗΜΧΤΡΣ ΒΝΛΛ∆ΘΒΗ≅Κ.ΗΜΧΤΡΣ ΒΝΛΛ∆ΘΒΗ≅Κ.ΗΜΧΤΡΣ ΒΝΛΛ∆ΘΒΗ≅Κ.ΗΜΧΤΡΣ ΒΝΛΛ∆ΘΒΗ≅Κ.ΗΜΧΤΡΣ ΒΝΛΛ∆ΘΒΗ≅Κ.ΗΜΧΤΡΣ ΒΝΛΛ∆ΘΒΗ≅Κ.ΗΜΧΤΡΣ 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 1/ 10 11 13 14 15 12 121,37,0453
ΡΒ≅Κ∆ 9 0!< 4//& ΥΗΒΗΜΗΣΞ Λ≅Ο 121,36,8062 ΤΜΗΣ∆Χ ΡΣ≅Σ∆Ρ ΟΝΡΣ≅Κ Ρ∆ΘΥΗΒ∆ ΟΝΡΣ≅Κ Ε≅ΒΗΚΗΣΞ 121,36,8461 ΤΜΗΣ∆Χ ΡΣ≅Σ∆Ρ ΟΝΡΣ≅Κ Ρ∆ΘΥΗΒ∆ ΟΝΡΣ≅Κ Ε≅ΒΗΚΗΣΞ 121,36,886/ ΤΜΗΣ∆Χ ΡΣ≅Σ∆Ρ ΟΝΡΣ≅Κ Ρ∆ΘΥΗΒ∆
ΟΝΡΣ≅Κ Ε≅ΒΗΚΗΣΞ 121,37,/258 ΤΜΗΣ∆Χ ΡΣ≅Σ∆Ρ ΟΝΡΣ≅Κ Ρ∆ΘΥΗΒ∆ ΟΝΡΣ≅Κ Ε≅ΒΗΚΗΣΞ 121,37,/656 ΤΜΗΣ∆Χ ΡΣ≅Σ∆Ρ ΟΝΡΣ≅Κ Ρ∆ΘΥΗΒ∆ ΟΝΡΣ≅Κ Ε≅ΒΗΚΗΣΞ 121,37,0055 ΤΜΗΣ∆Χ ΡΣ≅Σ∆Ρ ΟΝΡΣ≅Κ Ρ∆ΘΥΗΒ∆ ΟΝΡΣ≅Κ Ε≅ΒΗΚΗΣΞ
121,37,1613 Α ∆ Φ ΗΗ ΚΚΒ % Ι ϑ Α Φ ΗΗ ΚΚΒ ΤΜΗΣ∆Χ ΡΣ≅Σ∆Ρ ΟΝΡΣ≅Κ Ρ∆ΘΥΗΒ∆ ΟΝΡΣ≅Κ Ε≅ΒΗΚΗΣΞ ΒΝΛΛ∆ΘΒΗ≅Κ.ΗΜΧΤΡΣ 121,37,4142 ∆∆ΡΑΤΘΦ ΚΝΧΦ∆ ΜΝ−0/30 ∆∆ΡΑΤΘΦ ΚΝΧΦ∆ Ε≅ΒΗΚΗΣΞ 121,37,6/50 Β≅ΡΓ∆Υ
ΚΚΒ ΒΝΛΛ∆ΘΒΗ≅Κ.ΗΜΧΤΡΣ 121,37,7654 ΒΝΝΟ∆Θ+ ς≅ΞΜ∆ Ε % ΙΤΚΗ∆ ∆ ∆Σ ≅Κ ΒΝΛΛ∆ΘΒΗ≅Κ.ΗΜΧΤΡΣ 121,38,/758 ΑΘ≅ΜΒΓ Α≅ΜϑΗΜΦ % ΣΘΤΡΣ ΒΝ ΝΕ Υ≅ ΒΝΛΛ∆ΘΒΗ≅Κ.ΗΜΧΤΡΣ 121,38,/682 ΛΗΧΧΚ∆ΑΤΘΦ Α≅Μϑ+ ΣΓ∆ ΒΝΛΛ∆ΘΒΗ≅Κ.ΗΜΧΤΡΣ
121,38,0/64 ΒΝΛΛ∆ΘΒΗ≅Κ.ΗΜΧΤΡΣ 120,07,/688 ΤΘΑ≅Μ ΡΗΜΦΚ∆ Ε≅ΛΗΚΞ 17 120,07,626/ Κ∆∆ΡΑΤΘΦ+ ΣΝςΜ ΝΕ ∆Ω∆ΛΟΣ 18 120,07,5133 Λ≅ΧΗΡΝΜ ΓΝΤΡ∆ ≅ΡΡΝΒΗ≅Σ∆Ρ ΗΗ ΚΟ ΛΤΚΣΗ,Ε≅ΛΗΚΞ 2/ 120,07,3362 Λ≅ΧΗΡΝΜ
ΓΝΤΡ∆ ≅ΡΡΝΒΗ≅Σ∆Ρ ΗΗ ΚΟ ΛΤΚΣΗ,Ε≅ΛΗΚΞ 20 120071/71 ΕΝΚ∆Ξ+ ΜΝΘΛ≅Μ Β % ΤΘΑ≅Μ ΡΗΜΦΚ∆ Ε≅ΛΗΚΞ 21 120,07,/177 Κ∆∆+ Φ≅ΘΞ Ν % Β≅ΘΝΚΞΜ Α ΛΤΚΣΗ,Ε≅ΛΗΚΞ 120,06,7181 120,06,708/ 120,06,7/76 120,06,6871
120,06,6667 120,06,6463 120,06,6257 120,06,585/ ϑ∆ΞΡ+ Λ≅ΣΣΓ∆ς ΣΗΛΝΣΓΞ % ≅ΜΞ≅ ΤΘΑ≅Μ ΡΗΜΦΚ∆ Ε≅ΛΗΚΞ 22 ΒΚ∆ΛΝΜΡ+ ≅ΜΜ ΛΝΡΡ % Χ≅Μ∆ΗΚ Θ Σ∆∆Ρ Κ≅ϑ∆+ Χ∆≅Μ Σ ςΓΗΡΚ∆Θ+ ΛΗΒΓ≅∆Κ Β+ Α≅ϑ∆Θ+ ς≅Χ∆ Γ
% ∆ΛΗΚ∆Ξ Λ+ 23 ΤΘΑ≅Μ ΡΗΜΦΚ∆ Ε≅ΛΗΚΞ 24 25 26 27 28 3/ ΤΘΑ≅Μ ΡΗΜΦΚ∆ Ε≅ΛΗΚΞ ΤΘΑ≅Μ ΡΗΜΦΚ∆ Ε≅ΛΗΚΞ ΤΘΑ≅Μ ΡΗΜΦΚ∆ Ε≅ΛΗΚΞ Φ≅ΘΥ∆Ξ+ Β≅ΘΘΗ∆ ϑ Θ % Ο∆Σ∆Θ Ι Α≅ΘΘΞ+ Χ∆Κ≅Μ∆Ξ Ρ % ΣΘΗΡ ΙΝΡ∆ΟΓ ΗΗ ΤΘΑ≅Μ
ΡΗΜΦΚ∆ Ε≅ΛΗΚΞ ΤΘΑ≅Μ ΡΗΜΦΚ∆ Ε≅ΛΗΚΞ ΤΘΑ≅Μ ΡΗΜΦΚ∆ Ε≅ΛΗΚΞΒΓ≅ΛΑΚΗΜ+ Ι≅Λ∆Ρ ΒΓΘΗΡΣΝΟΓ∆Θ % ΒΓ≅ΛΑΚΗΜ+ ΚΞΜΧΡ≅Ξ ς∆ΚΡΓ 120,06,4710 ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΥΗΚΚ≅Φ∆ ΓΝΚΧΗΜΦΡ ΚΚΒ Β Θ ϑΗΜΦ ΡΣΘ∆∆Σ ΚΚΒ ΒΝΛΛ∆ΘΒΗ≅Κ.ΗΜΧΤΡΣ
ΒΝΛΛ∆ΘΒΗ≅Κ.ΗΜΧΤΡΣ31 ςΗΚΚΗ≅Λ Χ∆≅Μ ΛΗΚΚ∆Θ Ε≅ΛΗΚΞ ΚΚΒ ΒΝΛΛ∆ΘΒΗ≅Κ.ΗΜΧΤΡΣ30 120,06,534/ ΘΗΚ∆Ξ+ ΒΓ≅∆ Ρ ΒΝΛΛ∆ΘΒΗ≅Κ.ΗΜΧΤΡΣ32 120,06,60/1 16 120,07,/811,//0 ΒΘ∆ΡΒ∆ΜΣ ΡΣ≅ΣΗΝΜ ΚΚΒ Κ∆∆ΡΑΤΘΦ ΑΤΗΚΧΗΜΦ
Ο≅ΘΣΜ∆ΘΡ ΚΚΒ ΒΘ∆ΡΒ∆ΜΣ ΟΚ≅Β∆ ΟΘΝΟ∆ΘΣΞ ΝςΜ∆ΘΡ ≅ΡΡΝΒΜ ΟΝΡΣ≅Κ Ε≅ΒΗΚΗΣΞ ΒΧΧ ΒΧΧ ΒΧΧ ΒΧΧ ΒΧΧ ΒΧΧ ΒΧΧ ΒΧΧ ΒΧΧ ΒΧΧ ΒΧΧ ΒΧΧ ΒΧΧ ΒΧΧ ΒΧΧ ΒΧΧ ΒΧΧ ΒΧΧ ΒΧΧ ΒΧΧ ΒΧΧ ΒΧΧ ΒΧΧ ΒΧΧ ΒΧΧ ΟΘΜ ΟΘΜ ΟΘΜ Θ,11
Θ,5 Θ,11 Θ,5 Θ,5 Θ,5 Θ,5 Θ,5 Θ,5 Θ,5 Θ,5 Θ,5 ΒΧΧ ΒΧΧ ΒΧΧ ΒΧΧ ΒΧΧΦ 120,06,6602 ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΥΗΚΚ≅Φ∆ ΓΝΚΧΗΜΦΡ ΚΚΒ ΒΝΛΛ∆ΘΒΗ≅Κ.ΗΜΧΤΡΣ ΒΧΧΕ 121,37,1574 ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΥΗΚΚ≅Φ∆ ΓΝΚΧΗΜΦΡ ΚΚΒ ΒΝΛΛ∆ΘΒΗ≅Κ.ΗΜΧΤΡΣ
ΒΧΧ∆ 121,37,1574 ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΥΗΚΚ≅Φ∆ ΓΝΚΧΗΜΦΡ ΚΚΒ ΒΝΛΛ∆ΘΒΗ≅Κ.ΗΜΧΤΡΣ ΒΧΧΧ 120,07,45/5 ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΥΗΚΚ≅Φ∆ ΓΝΚΧΗΜΦΡ ΚΚΒ ΒΝΛΛ∆ΘΒΗ≅Κ.ΗΜΧΤΡΣ ΒΧΧ Β 120,07,/200 ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΥΗΚΚ≅Φ∆ ΓΝΚΧΗΜΦΡ ΚΚΒ ΒΝΛΛ∆ΘΒΗ≅Κ.ΗΜΧΤΡΣ
ΒΧΧΑ 120,06,8231 ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΥΗΚΚ≅Φ∆ ΓΝΚΧΗΜΦΡ ΚΚΒ ΛΤΚΣΗ,Ε≅ΛΗΚΞ Θ,11≅ 120,07,/36/ ΦΚ∆ΜΧ≅ ϑ≅Ξ ≅ΤΡΣΗΜ ΒΝΛΛ∆ΘΒΗ≅Κ.ΗΜΧΤΡΣ ΒΝΛΛ∆ΘΒΗ≅Κ.ΗΜΧΤΡΣ ΒΝΛΛ∆ΘΒΗ≅Κ.ΗΜΧΤΡΣ VA. STATE GRID NORTH N %%UTOWNHOUSE
TYPICAL SIDE LOAD DETAIL N.T.S NOTE: ALL LOTS WILL HAVE A STOOP OR PORCH. 50% WILL BE CONSTRUCTED AS PORCHES PER TOWN CODE. DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY SHALL BE IN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE
WITH THIS CONCEPT PLAN WHICH SHALL CONTROL THE USE, LAYOUT, AND CONFIGURATION OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY, WITH REASONABLE ALLOWANCES TO BE MADE FOR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN ALTERATIONS
IN ACCORDANCE WITH TOWN ZONING, SUBDIVISION, AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. AS NOTED ON SPECIFIC SHEETS, CERTAIN ENGINEERING, ARCHITECTURE, AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE FEATURES ARE
SHOWN FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY. STREETSCAPE. SEE SHEETS C5-01 18' MIN TRAVELWAY OR OPEN SPACE COMMON PARKING COURT 10' MIN STOOP (TYP.) LANDING (TYP.) GARBAGE CONTAINER (TYP.)
GAR. MIN. DIM. = 2 GARAGES @ 10' X 19' (TYP) COMBO OF EVERGREEN GROUND COVER AND DECORATIVE STONE (TYP.) HVAC UNITS (TYP.) RISERS (VARIES) 20' (TYP.) COMMON PARKING COURT TRAVELWAY
OR OPEN SPACE HVAC UNITS WILL BE ROOF MOUNTED TREEPIT GAR. MIN. DIM. = 19' X 19' (TYP) STREETSCAPE SECTION VARIES LANDING (TYP.) STOOP (TYP.) GARBAGE CONTAINER (TYP.) 5' MIN \A1;5'
MIN RISERS (VARIES) COMBO OF EVERGREEN GROUND COVER AND DECORATIVE STONE (TYP.) 5.0' MIN TO LOT LINE LOT LINE COINCIDENT WITH FACE OF CURB (NOT WITHIN COMMON PARKING COURT) \pxqc;{\W0.85;CATOCTIN
CIR SE} { ROUTE 15} { DEPOT CIRCLE { HARRISON STREET SE} \pxqc;{\W0.85;CATOCTIN CIR SW} \pxqc;{\W0.85;CARLTON STREET SW} { S KING { MONROE ST 1 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 24 222120 4 3 2
23 25 A B D E C G F 41 42 43 40 SITE 19 20' (TYP.) COMMON PARKING COURT HVAC UNITS WILL BE ROOF MOUNTED TREEPIT GAR. MIN. DIM. = 19' X 19' (TYP) STREETSCAPE SECTION VARIES LANDING
(TYP.) STOOP (TYP.) GARBAGE CONTAINER (TYP.) 5' MIN TO CURB RISERS (VARIES) COMBO OF EVERGREEN GROUND COVER AND DECORATIVE STONE (TYP.) 5.0' MIN TO LOT LINE LOT LINE COINCIDENT WITH
FACE OF CURB (NOT WITHIN COMMON PARKING COURT) 222 Item a. 07/03/19 ΡΒ≅Κ∆9 ΡΓ∆∆Σ ΕΗΚ∆ Μν− Οκµµδθρ ∆µφηµδδθρ Κµχρβοδ ≅θβγησδβσρ Κµχ Ρτθυδξνθρ Τθαµ+ Κσχ− ϖϖϖ−τθαµ,κσχ−βνλ Σδκ−
6/2−531−7/7/ ≅µµµχκδ+ Υηθφηµη 11//2 6601 Κησσκδ Θηυδθ Στθµοηϕδ TM ΟΚ≅Μ Χ≅Σ∆ No.DATEDESCRIPTION Θ∆ΥΗΡΗΝΜΡ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΥΗΚΚ≅Φ∆ ΣΝςΜ ΝΕ Κ∆∆ΡΑΤΘΦ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΨΟ,130/ ΨΝΜΗΜΦ Λ≅Ο ≅Λ∆ΜΧΛ∆ΜΣ Ε
∆ Μ Η Φ Μν−/11/37 Χ≅ΥΗΧ Σ− Λβ∆ΚΓ≅Μ∆Ξ Γ Ν ς Μ Ν Λ Λ Κ ≅ Σ ∆ Β Ο Θ Ν Μ Η Υ Ε Ν Η Θ Φ Η Θ ≅ ∆ ∆ ≅ Ρ Ν Μ Η Ρ ∆ Μ Κ 10/27/2021 07/03/19FIRST SUBMISSION 1 02/27/20 02/27/20SECOND SUBMISSION
2 09/25/20 09/25/20THIRD SUBMISSION 3 03/12/21 03/12/21FOURTH SUBMISSION 4 06/29/21 06/29/21FIFTH SUBMISSION 5 10/27/21FINAL PLANNING COMMISSION SET 6 10/27/21 Φ∆Μ∆Θ≅Κ ΜΝΣ∆Ρ ≅ΜΧ Χ∆Σ≅ΗΚΡ
Β1,/1 Μ.≅ %%UZONING & AREA TABULATIONS SITE AREA: 18.48 AC OR 805,115 SF EXISTING ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING: CD-RH SUB-DISTRICT (210,838 SF , 4.84 AC) CD-CC SUB-DISTRICT (594,277 SF,
13.64 AC) EXISTING USE: COMMERCIAL PROPOSED USE: MIXED USE (RETAIL, OFFICE, MULTIFAMILY TOWN HOMES 2 OVER 2'S) PROPOSED TOWNHOUSE UNITS: 53 (LOCATED WITHIN CD-RH SUB-DISTRICT) PROPOSED
TOTAL RETAIL GFA: 65,000 SF (LOCATED WITHIN CD-CC SUB-DISTRICT) PROPOSED TOTAL OFFICE GFA: 100,800 SF (LOCATED WITHIN CD-CC SUB-DISTRICT) PROPOSED MULTIFAMILY UNITS: 562 UNITS (LOCATED
WITHIN CD-CC SUB-DISTRICT) PROPOSED STACKED TOWNHOUSE UNITS: 28 (LOCATED WITHIN CD-RH SUB-DISTRICT) FLOODPLAIN AREA: ±2.55 AC RESIDENTIAL DENSITY WITHIN CD-RH SUB-DISTRICT: (53+28)/4.84
= ±16.7 DU/AC (<24 OK) CD DISTRICT (805,115 SF , 18.48 AC) R-22, CD, H-2 OVERLAY DISTRICT, FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT, H-2 OVERLAY DISTRICT TO BE REMOVED WITH THIS APPLICATION. AND
CREEK VALLEY BUFFER OVERLAY DISTRICT TOWNHOUSE 25 FEET STACKED TOWNHOUSE 25 FEET BUILDING A 25 FEET BUILDING B 25 FEET BUILDING C 25 FEET BUILDING D 25 FEET BUILDING E 25 FEET BUILDING
F 25 FEET RESIDENTIAL DENSITY WITHIN CD-CC SUB-DISTRICT: (562)/(13.64) = ±41.2 DU/AC (>24, MODIFICATION REQUESTED) BUILDING GFA (WITHIN CD-CC SUB-DISTRICT) BUILDING RESIDENTIAL UNIT
COUNT (WITHIN CD-CC SUB-DISTRICT) MULTIFAMILY (UNITS)** BUILDING A 224 BUILDING B 0 BUILDING C 0 BUILDING D 72 BUILDING E 266 BUILDING F 0 TOTAL 562 NON - RESIDENTIAL FAR TOTAL RETAIL=
65,000 SF TOTAL OFFICE=100,800 SF TOTAL COMBINED=165,800 SF SITE AREA=13.64 AC. -2.55AC=11.09AC=483,080 SF. F.A.R.= 165,800/483,080=0.34. %%UADU TABLE MINIMUM REQUIRED 70 FEET 70 FEET
70 FEET 70 FEET 70 FEET 70 FEET 70 FEET 70 FEET MAXIMUM REQUIRED 49.5 FEET 49.5 FEET 70 FEET 70 FEET 70 FEET 70 FEET 70 FEET 27 FEET* MAXIMUM PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY WITHIN CD-CC
SUB-DISTRICT EXCLUDING (562)/(10.46) = ±53.7 DU/AC (>24, MODIFICATION REQUESTED) FLOODPLAIN & STEEP SLOPES: TOTAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS: 643 ADU'S REQUIRED: 5% OF 643= 32.15 ADU'S PROVIDED:
33 UNITS NOTE: SEE SHEETS L1-06 AND L1-07 FOR USABLE OPEN SPACE AND AMENITY SPACE TABULATIONS \pxqc;{\LOPEN SPACE} *2.55 AC OF FLOODPLAIN DEDUCTED FROM TOTAL SITE AREA (10.46 ACRES
IS EQUAL TO THE SITE AREA WITHIN THE CD-CC SUB-DISTRICT MINUS THE FLOODPLAIN AND STEEP SLOPE AREA) %%UREQUIRED LOADING SPACES TABULATION: TOTAL BUILDING A BUILDING B BUILDING C BUILDING
E BUILDING F BUILDING D PARKING RATE RETAIL (GFA) 1SP / 15,000 GFA + 1SP / EA ADD'L 25,000 GFA OFFICE (GFA) 1SP / 20,000 GFA + 1SP / EA ADD'L 30,000 GFA REQ'D LOADING SPACE 25,500 GFA
8,500 GFA 6,000 GFA 23,500 GFA 1,500 GFA 0 GFA 1.4 SPACES 1.0 SPACES 1.0 SPACES 1.3 SPACES 1.0 SPACES 0.0 SPACES 0 GFA 59,300 GFA 41,500 GFA 0 GFA 0 GFA 0 GFA REQ'D LOADING SPACE TOTAL
REQ'D LOADING SPACE PROVIDED LOADING SPACE BUILDING 0.0 SPACES 2.3 SPACES 1.7 SPACES 0.0 SPACES 0.0 SPACES 0.0 SPACES 1.0 SPACES 3.0 SPACES 3.0 SPACES 1.0 SPACES 1.0 SPACES 0.0 SPACES
65,000 GFA 100,800 GFA 9.0 SPACES** 2.0 SPACES 1.0 SPACES 1.0 SPACES 2.0 SPACES 0.0 SPACES 1.0 SPACES 7.0 SPACES SHARED LOADING 65,000 GFA 100,800 GFA 7.0 SPACES 7.0 SPACES SP CALCULATION
3.0 SPACES 3.7 SPACES **MODIFICATION REQUESTED TO CALCULATE REQUIRED LOADING PARKING SPACES ON A TOTAL GFA BASIS FOR RETAIL AND OFFICE USE COMBINED. SEE MODIFICATION 45 ON SHEET C11-01.
TLZO 7.10.8.F HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS 35 FEET 35 FEET 45 FEET 45 FEET 45 FEET 45 FEET 45 FEET 25 FEET* MINIMUM PROPOSED PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHTS *MODIFICATION APPROVED TO PERMIT BUILDING
F TO BE ONE-STORY. SEE MODIFICATION 6 ON SHEET C11-01 %%UCONCEPTUAL UTILITY SECTIONS: SCALE: 1" = 10' NOTE: ACTUAL UTILITY DESIGN TO BE VERIFIED AT TIME OF FINAL ENGINEERING 8" W/M1
1 1 11 1 1 1 8" SAN1 1 1 1 \A1;13' LANE \A1;13' LANE {\LFAIRFAX STREET SE} FACE OF BUILDING FACE OF BUILDING 48" STM \A1;8' PARKING \A1;13' \A1;9' \A1;2' \A1;%%P12' COVER \A1;%%P11.5'
COVER %%P6' COVER 8" W/M1 1 1 1 \A1;8' PARKING {MADISON COURT ONE-WAY } FACE OF BUILDING 14' ONE WAY LANE \A1;13' COMMON GREEN 8" SAN1 1 1 1 \A1;12' LANE \A1;12' LANE {\LPRIVATE ROAD
'B'/'C'} FACE OF BUILDING FACE OF BUILDING \A1;12' %%P6' COVER 15" STM1 1 1 1 8" W/M 1 1 1 1 \A1;8' PARKING \A1;12' LANE {\LPRIVATE ROAD 'D'} FACE OF BUILDING \A1;9' \A1;12' LANE \A1;2'
%%P3' COVER (TYP.) %%P4' COVER (TYP.) 8" W/M1 1 1 1 8" SAN 1 1 1 1 \A1;12' LANE \A1;12' LANE {\LPRIVATE ROAD 'A'} FACE OF BUILDING FACE OF BUILDING \A1;6' \A1;13' \A1;8' PARKING {\LMADISON
COURT } FACE OF BUILDING FACE OF BUILDING \A1;12' LANE \A1;12' LANE \A1;8' PARKING 8" W/M1 1 11 \A1;13' 15" STM1 1 1 1 \A1;8' PARKING {\LHIGH STREET} FACE OF BUILDING \A1;12' LANE
\A1;12' LANE \A1;8' PARKING 8" W/M1 1 11 \A1;15'\A1;13' 15" STM1 1 1 1 HIGH STREET PARK 223 Item a. 07/03/19 ΡΒ≅Κ∆9 ΡΓ∆∆Σ ΕΗΚ∆ Μν− Οκµµδθρ ∆µφηµδδθρ Κµχρβοδ ≅θβγησδβσρ Κµχ Ρτθυδξνθρ
Τθαµ+ Κσχ− ϖϖϖ−τθαµ,κσχ−βνλ Σδκ− 6/2−531−7/7/ ≅µµµχκδ+ Υηθφηµη 11//2 6601 Κησσκδ Θηυδθ Στθµοηϕδ TM ΟΚ≅Μ Χ≅Σ∆ No.DATEDESCRIPTION Θ∆ΥΗΡΗΝΜΡ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΥΗΚΚ≅Φ∆ ΣΝςΜ ΝΕ Κ∆∆ΡΑΤΘΦ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅
ΨΟ,130/ ΨΝΜΗΜΦ Λ≅Ο ≅Λ∆ΜΧΛ∆ΜΣ Ε ∆ Μ Η Φ Μν−/11/37 Χ≅ΥΗΧ Σ− Λβ∆ΚΓ≅Μ∆Ξ Γ Ν ς Μ Ν Λ Λ Κ ≅ Σ ∆ Β Ο Θ Ν Μ Η Υ Ε Ν Η Θ Φ Η Θ ≅ ∆ ∆ ≅ Ρ Ν Μ Η Ρ ∆ Μ Κ 10/27/2021 07/03/19FIRST SUBMISSION 1 02/27/20
02/27/20SECOND SUBMISSION 2 09/25/20 09/25/20THIRD SUBMISSION 3 03/12/21 03/12/21FOURTH SUBMISSION 4 06/29/21 06/29/21FIFTH SUBMISSION 5 10/27/21FINAL PLANNING COMMISSION SET 6 10/27/21
Ο≅ΘϑΗΜΦ Σ≅ΑΤΚ≅ΣΗΝΜΡ Β1,/2 Μ.≅ %%UREQUIRED COMMERCIAL PARKING TABULATION - HIGH DEMAND SCENARIO %%UNOTES BUILDING A MF UNIT TYPE MIN. SPACES REQUIRED 224 TOTAL UNITS ASSUMED UNIT MIX
B-1 PARKING RATE STUDIO/1BR - 170 2 BR - 54 1.0 / UNIT 1.5 / UNIT 170 81 BUILDING D MF 72 STUDIO/1BR - 24 2 BR - 46 1.0 / UNIT 1.5 / UNIT 24 69 3 BR - 2 2.5 / UNIT 5 BUILDING E MF 266
STUDIO/1BR - 186 2 BR - 80 1.0 / UNIT 1.5 / UNIT 186 120 TOTAL 562 BUILDING B N/A N/A N/AN/A 0 BUILDING C N/A N/A N/AN/A 0 BUILDING F N/A N/A N/AN/A 0 STICK 1 (LOTS 1-5) TOWNHOUSE 5
10 UNIT GARAGES (2) STICK 2 (LOTS 6-11) TOWNHOUSE 6 12 UNIT GARAGES (2) STICK 3 (LOTS 12-17) TOWNHOUSE 6 12 UNIT GARAGES (2) STICK 4 (LOTS 18-22) TOWNHOUSE 5 10 UNIT GARAGES (2) STICK
5 (LOTS 23-27) TOWNHOUSE 5 10 UNIT GARAGES (2) STICK 6 (LOTS 28-33) TOWNHOUSE 6 12 UNIT GARAGES (2) STICK 7 (LOTS 34-39) TOWNHOUSE 6 12 STICK 8 (LOTS 40-45) TOWNHOUSE 6 12 TOTAL 204
= 2.52 PER UNIT 81 12.5 15 15 12.5 12.5 15 15 15 STICK 1 STACKED TOWNHOME 14 28 UNIT GARAGES (1) + DRIVEWAY (1) STICK 2 14 28 UNIT GARAGES (1) + DRIVEWAY (1) 35 35 OFFLOT42 STACKED
TOWNHOME %%UREQUIRED RESIDENTIAL PARKING TABULATION - TOWNHOUSES UNIT TYPE NUMBER OF UNITS SPACES REQUIRED SPACES PROVIDED * LOCATION REQUIRED: 1,305 SPACES* PROVIDED: 1,600 SPACES**
STICK 8 (LOTS 46-53) TOWNHOUSE 8 16 20 UNIT GARAGES (2) UNIT GARAGES (2) UNIT GARAGES (2) %%UREQUIRED COMMERCIAL PARKING TABULATION - LOW DEMAND SCENARIO 1. THE SHARED PARKING ILLUSTRATIVE
TABLES ARE INTENDED TO BE ILLUSTRATIONS OF HOW SECTION 11.4.5 OF THE TOWN OF LEESBURG'S ZONING ORDINANCE (SHARED PARKING) WOULD BE APPLIED TO A SAMPLE MIX OF USES IN ORDER TO ESTABLISH
A MINIMUM PARKING REQUIREMENT. 2. IN NO WAY DO THESE TABLES IMPOSE A RESTRICTION ON THE MIX OF USES, NOR DO THEY SET MINIMUM OR A MAXIMUM ON THE ALLOWABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR ANY INDIVIDUAL
USE. 3. REMOVED AT TOWN SUGGESTION. 4. THESE TABLES SHOW TWO SAMPLE SCENARIOS: HIGH PARKING DEMAND REFLECTS MORE RESTAURANT USES. LOW PARKING DEMAND REFLECTS MORE RETAIL USES. TOTAL
COMMERCIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE UNDER BOTH SCENARIOS IS CAPPED AS SHOWN ON SHEET C2-02. 5. THE TABLES ARE ORGANIZED BY PHASE. THE ANALYSIS FOR EACH PHASE ASSUMES ALL THE USES FROM PRIOR
PHASES ARE CONSIDERED ON A CUMULATIVE BASIS, WHICH IS ANTICIPATED TO BE CONSISTENT WITH HOW THE TOWN WILL EVALUATE NEW BUILDINGS AND TENANTS AT THE CONSTRUCTION STAGE. 6. OUTDOOR SEAT
COUNT IS AN ALLOWANCE. ACTUAL OUTDOOR SEATING COULD BE MORE OR LESS. THE COMBINED TOTAL REQUIRED MINIMUM PARKING FOR THE RETAIL AND RESIDENTIAL USES IN BUILDINGS A THROUGH F IS 1,102
SPACES AS SHOWN IN THE TWO TABLES ABOVE. THE TOTAL MINIMUM REQUIRED PARKING SPACES FOR THE USES IN BUILDINGS A THROUGH F IS EXCEEDED VIA STRUCTURED PARKING AND OFFLOT PARKING SPACES
ON FAIRFAX STREET AND HIGH STREET. THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS WILL BE MET BY THE TOTAL PROVIDED PARKING IN BUILDINGS A THROUGH F AND THE OFFLOT PARKING SPACES. REFER TO SHEETS A8-01 THROUGH
A8-04 FOR THE STRUCTURED PARKING PLANS. \pxqc;{\LPROVIDED RESIDENTIAL/COMMERICIAL PARKING TABULATION (BUILDINGS A THROUGH F, OFFLOT AND ONLOT)} NUMBER OF UNITS AND MIX USED FOR THE
MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL PARKING TABULATION MAY CHANGE AT FINAL SITE PLAN BASED ON MARKET CONDITIONS. HOWEVER, THERE WILL BE A MAXIMUM OF 562 UNITS. IF UNIT MIX CHANGES AT TIME OF FINAL
SITE PLAN, IT WILL BE DEMONSTRATED THAT PARKING REQUIREMENTS REMAIN SATISFIED PER THE RATES SHOWN HEREON. TYPE OF RETAIL USED FOR THE COMMERCIAL PARKING TABULATION MAY CHANGE AT FINAL
SITE PLAN APPROVAL. IF TYPE OF RETAIL USE CHANGES SUBSEQUENT TO APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN, PARKING WILL BE SATISFIED PER THE RATES SHOWN ON THESE SHARED PARKING STUDIES AND IN ACCORDANCE
WITH SECTION 11 OF THE TOWN OF LEESBURG ZONING ORDINANCE. (2.5/UNIT FROM A PRIVATE STREET) (2.5/UNIT FROM A PRIVATE STREET) (2.5/UNIT FROM A PRIVATE STREET) (2.5/UNIT FROM A PRIVATE
STREET) (2.5/UNIT FROM A PRIVATE STREET) (2.5/UNIT FROM A PRIVATE STREET) (2.5/UNIT FROM A PRIVATE STREET) (2.5/UNIT FROM A PRIVATE STREET) (2.5/UNIT FROM A PRIVATE STREET) (2.5/UNIT
FROM A PRIVATE STREET) *MODIFICATION REQUESTED TO PERMIT GARAGE PARKING SPACE CREDIT TO ALLOW FOR TWO-CAR GARAGES TO BE COUNTED AS TWO PARKING SPACES AND FOR ONE-CAR GARAGES TO BE COUNTED
AS ONE PARKING SPACE. SEE MODIFICATION 43 ON SHEET C11-01. (2.5/UNIT FROM A PRIVATE STREET) 203 INCLUDED IN TOTAL REQUIRED PARKING 655 INCLUDED IN TOTAL REQUIRED PARKING INCLUDED IN
TOTAL REQUIRED PARKING *THE REQUIRED PARKING SPACES ARE BASED ON AN ASSUMED SQUARE FOOTAGE MIX AND TYPE OF RETAIL AND OFFICE USES AND UNIT MIX OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS. IF UNIT MIX CHANGES
AT TIME OF FINAL SITE PLAN, IT WILL BE DEMONSTRATED THAT PARKING REQUIREMENTS REMAIN SATISFIED PER THE RATES SHOWN ON THIS SHEET. **THE PROVIDED PARKING AT TIME OF FINAL ENGINEERING
IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON FINAL SQUARE FOOTAGES OF RETAIL AND OFFICE AND NUMBER AND UNIT MIX OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS. THE PROVIDED PARKING AT TIME OF FINAL ENGINEERING MAY BY LESS
THAN 1,600 SPACES BUT WILL MEET OR EXCEED THE REQUIRED PARKING. 655 REQUIRED MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SPACES 203 REQUIRED TOWNHOME RESIDENTIAL SPACES 447 REQUIRED COMMERCIAL SPACES
________________________________________________ 224 Item a. 07/03/19 ΡΒ≅Κ∆9 ΡΓ∆∆Σ ΕΗΚ∆ Μν− Οκµµδθρ ∆µφηµδδθρ Κµχρβοδ ≅θβγησδβσρ Κµχ Ρτθυδξνθρ Τθαµ+ Κσχ− ϖϖϖ−τθαµ,κσχ−βνλ Σδκ−
6/2−531−7/7/ ≅µµµχκδ+ Υηθφηµη 11//2 6601 Κησσκδ Θηυδθ Στθµοηϕδ TM ΟΚ≅Μ Χ≅Σ∆ No.DATEDESCRIPTION Θ∆ΥΗΡΗΝΜΡ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΥΗΚΚ≅Φ∆ ΣΝςΜ ΝΕ Κ∆∆ΡΑΤΘΦ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΨΟ,130/ ΨΝΜΗΜΦ Λ≅Ο ≅Λ∆ΜΧΛ∆ΜΣ Ε
∆ Μ Η Φ Μν−/11/37 Χ≅ΥΗΧ Σ− Λβ∆ΚΓ≅Μ∆Ξ Γ Ν ς Μ Ν Λ Λ Κ ≅ Σ ∆ Β Ο Θ Ν Μ Η Υ Ε Ν Η Θ Φ Η Θ ≅ ∆ ∆ ≅ Ρ Ν Μ Η Ρ ∆ Μ Κ 10/27/2021 07/03/19FIRST SUBMISSION 1 02/27/20 02/27/20SECOND SUBMISSION
2 09/25/20 09/25/20THIRD SUBMISSION 3 03/12/21 03/12/21FOURTH SUBMISSION 4 06/29/21 06/29/21FIFTH SUBMISSION 5 10/27/21FINAL PLANNING COMMISSION SET 6 10/27/21 ∆ΩΗΡΣΗΜΦ ΒΝΜΧΗΣΗΝΜΡ Β2,/0
0&<5/& 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE060 60 120 60 24030 N VA. STATE GRID NORTH 4 bol5R ch 4R 2 gm bol gm ch ch ch 5R gm gm 4R 5R ch gm 4R vent ~ asphalt ~ ~ asphalt ~ ~
asphalt ~ ~ asphalt ~ ~ asphalt ~ ~ asphalt ~ ~ asphalt ~ ~ asphalt ~ ~ asphalt ~ ~ asphalt ~ concrete 2 gm2 bol eb 2 bol 2 bol 2 bol ws ws ws (typ) ws (typ) gv 4 bol ep ep ep ws (typ)
dig 2R gm 2 bol ep conc. 7R 6R gm 3 bol 4R 19R ~ dirt ~ ~ grass ~ ~ grass ~ ~ grass ~ worn foot path 8' gravel drive ~ asphalt ~ ep ep ep ep a/c units on raised platform dumpster bol
~ asphalt ~ ~ asphalt ~ ~ asphalt ~ ~ asphalt ~ brick paver s/w dig dig dig dig dig dig ssmh sdmh sdmh sdmh sdmh sdmh sdmh sdmh ssmh ssmh roof overhang over conc. s/w ~ grass ~ ep roof
overhang over conc. s/w roof overhang over conc. s/w covered conc. s/w covered conc. s/w drive-through canopy drive-through canopy conc. s/w conc. s/w speed bump speed bump speed bump
lsa lsa lsa lsa lsa lsa lsa lsa lsa lsa 2R lsa 5R ~ asphalt ~ ~ asphalt ~ ~ asphalt ~ vb vb vb tb tb tbcb tb conc. barriers conc. s/w hand rail ssmh ssmh ssmh ssmh ssmh sdmh sdmh sdmh
2 bol 2 gm 2 gm 2 gm 2 gm gm gm cofdccowater meter vault w / 4 bollards conc. conc. conc. conc. conc. conc. conc. conc. 6R water meter vault w / 4 bollards water meter vault w / 4 bollards
conc. conc. sdmh sdmh sdmh sdmh sdmh sdmhWells Fargo sign ssmh a/c units on raised platform a/c units on raised platform 4' metal barrier a/c units on raised platform a/c units on raised
platform a/c units on raised platform 2 bol 2 bol electric transformer on conc. pad conc. end wall 24" rcp conc. end wall 18" rcp sdmh conc. end wall asphalt trail asphalt trail riprap
conc. end wall tmh conc. end wall 2 gm 2 gm 2 gm co 7 gm a/c units on raised platform a/c units on raised platform a/c units on raised platform 4' metal barrier a/c unit co conc. conc.
fdc fdca/c units electric boxes conc. wm wm conc. electric box on conc. pad comcast boxes within fence bol bol 5.0'x8.4' brick A.T.M. overhang 2R wm conc. s/w conc. s/w conc. s/w conc.
s/w conc. s/w bol conc. s/w conc. s/w conc. s/w conc. s/w fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fcfc gv fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc conc. s/w roof overhang
over conc. s/w ws (typ) a/c units electric boxes retaining wall bol metal hand rail co em electric box 3 bol gm 2 wm 2R 2R 1R 1R 1R co co ssmh 3 bol gm em gv em a/ca/c bol wm wm gm
ev ev electric boxes em Virginia Village sign sdmh tel ped tel ped fc fc speed bump conc. conc. conc. communicatio ns vault ev ev ev ev gv conc. s/w 6' chain link fence vault lsa lsa
lsa lsa lsalsa lsa fc fc fc fc fc wm gravel drive gm6' chain link fence co fc fc fc conc. barriers tb tel ped 21 12 7 21 21 21 21 21 18 7 5 9 17 17 11 6 5 23 5 28 14 12 10 20 23 26
17 18 23 23 27 19 12 12 10 3 roof overhang 4' metal barrier 4' metal barrier 4' metal barrier 4' metal barrier 4' metal barrier raised loading dock raised loading dock 8'x12' shed 0.6'
off of property line 24'x36' garage wood fencegate wood fence wood fencewire fence wm 2.8' 0.9' 10'x14' shed mail box roof overhang covered stairway 16 not a space retaining wall dilapidated
structure attached to building TEMPORARY CUL DE SAC ESMT AS SHOWN ON PLAT REC PLAT CAB C SLOT 203 PG 5 CL VEPCO ESMT D.B. 365 PG 520 APPROX. CL VEPCO ESMT D.B. 367 PG 501 \pxqc;APPROX
CL VEPCO ESMT D.B. 365 PG. 520 FAIRFAX STREET SE N 23°12'07" E 99.83' N 24°00'40" E 100.98' S 65°44'50" E 62.01' N 18°51'56" E 317.27' S 71°06'22" E 350.00' S 18°54'15" W 349.58' N
23°12'16" E 60.00' N 66°47'44" W 128.01' 10' C & P TEL. CO RIGHT - OF - WAY D.B. 594 PG. 680 \pxqc;10' SAN. SEWER ESMT D.B. 403 PG. 227 APPROX. CL VEPCO ESMT D.B. 365 PG 520 15' UTILITY
ESMT D.B. 403 PG. 227 \pxqc;10' SAN. SEWER ESMT D.B. 403 PG. 227 APPROX LOCATION 10' STORM DRAIN ESMT D.B. 403 PG. APPROX LOCATION 10' STORM DRAIN ESMT D.B. 403 PG. 227 15' UTILITY
ESMT D.B. 403 PG. 227 \pxqc;10' SAN. SEWER ESMT D.B. 403 PG. 227 CL VEPCO ESMT D.B. 372 PG 512 CATOCTIN CIRCLE SE N 66°47'44" W 233.20' N 23°12'16" E 100.00' N 66°47'44" W 100.00'
S 23°12'16" W 100.00' N 23°12'16" E 350.00' S 89°56'00" W 29.74' N 23°25'29" E 11.77' APPROX CL VEPCO ESMT D.B. 365 PG. 520 APPROX LOC. C & P ESMT D.B. 528 PG. 477 15' UTILITY ESMT
D.B. 403 PG. 227 15' UTILITY ESMT D.B. 403 PG. 227 N 66°47'44" W 14.80' 10' C & P ESMT D.B. 504 PG. 254 APPROX. LOCATION VEPCO ESMT D.B. 509 PG 86 APPROX. LOCATION VEPCO ESMT D.B.
811 PG 1179 INGRESS & EGRESS ESMT D.B. 1007 PG 393 APPROX. LOCATION VEPCO ESMT D.B. 1070 PG 117 INGRESS & EGRESS ESMT D.B. 810 PG 429 STORM SEWER ESMT D.B. 1007 PG 393 HARRISON STREET
SE CATOCTIN CIRCLE APROX CL VEPCO ESMT D.B. 365 PG. 520 WATERLINE ESMT D.B. 1577 PG. 2110 15' UTILITY ESMT D.B. 356 PG. 498 N 59°34'51" E 323.58' S 08°13'41" E 616.79' C1 S 47°54'41"
W 42.48' S 72°49'09" W 52.79' C5 C6 C3 15' VA. POWER ESMT D.B. 935 PG 1476 10' WATERLINE ESMT D.B. 1007 PG 393 APPROX. LOCATION VEPCO ESMT D.B. 997 PG 948 5' SAN. SEWER ESMT D.B. 1007
PG 393 5' SAN. SEWER ESMT D.B. 1007 PG 393 \pxqc;10' SAN. SEWER ESMT D.B. 403 PG 227 10' WATERLINE ESMT STORM SEWER ESMT D.B. 1007 PG 393 25' SAN. SEWER ESMT D.B. 1007 PG 393 10' WATERLINE
ESMT D.B. 1007 PG 393 \pxqc;APPROX LOCATION VEPCO ESMT D.B. 1821 PG 2372 20' SAN. SEWER ESMT D.B. 403 PG 227, & D.B. 1007 PG 393 10' WATERLINE EASEMENT D.B. 1007 PG 393 10' BELL
ATLANTIC ESMT D.B. 1439 PG. APPROX. LOCATION BELL ATLANTIC ESMT D.B. 1821 PG. 2378 55' STORM DRAINAGE ESMT D.B. 661 PG. 626 APPROX LOCATION BELL ATLANTIC ESMT D.B. 1821 PG. 2378
10' C & P TEL. CO RIGHT - OF - WAY 10' BELL ATLANTIC ESMT D.B. 730 PG. 162 D.B. 1439 PG. 366 25' STORM DRAIN ESMT INST #20160212-0007940 16' TRAIL ESMT INST # 20160212-0007940 15'
SLOPE MAINTENANCE ESMT D.B. 793 PG. 137 STORM DRAINAGE ESMT D.B. 793 PG. 137 APPROX. CL VEPCO RIGHT OF WAY D.B. 365 PG. 520 30' UTILITY ESMT D.B. 358 PG. 498 10' C & P TEL. CO RIGHT
OF - WAY D.B. 594 PG. 680 10' C & P TEL. CO RIGHT OF - WAY D.B. 720 PG. 776 APPROX CL VEPCO RIGHT OF WAY D.B. 365 PG. 520 20' STORM SEWER ESMT D.B. 1007 PG 393 10' C & P TEL. CO
ESMT D.B. 730 PG. 10' BELL ATLANTIC ESMT D.B. 1439 PG. 366 40' DRAINAGE ESMT D.B. 358 PG.APPROX. CL VEPCO RIGHT OF WAY D.B. 365 PG. \pxqc;15' SLOPE MAINTENANCE ESMT D.B. 793 PG.
137 \pxqc;16' TRAIL ESMT INST # 20160212-0007940 S 66°47'44" E 2.80' (EX. 70' R.O.W.) (EX. 70' R.O.W.) (EX. 70' R.O.W.) (EX. 50' R.O.W.) MADISON COURT FEMA REGULATORY FLOODWAY REGULATORY
FLOODWAY (SEE NOTE 5) S 08°13'41" E 616.79' 299.8 NO PARKING NO PARKING S 78°42'25" E 4.92' N 10°52'32" E 7.66' 0.9' FEMA REGULATORY FLOODWAY & FEMA REGULATORY FLOODWAY & FEMA ZONE
"X" (SEE NOTE 5) 55' STORM DRAINAGE ESMT D.B. 661 PG 626 S 66°00'35" E 415.54' S 66°00'35" E 415.54' FEMA ZONE "X" (SEE NOTE 5) \pxqc;10' WALK WAY ESMT D.B. 790 PG. 597 0.4' 34 N 66°00'35"
W 415.54' APPARENT OVERLAP LINE PER D.B. 708 PG.37 LINE PER D.B. 349 PG. 229 APPARENT OVERLAP LINE PER D.B. 708 PG.37 LINE PER D.B. 349 PG. 229 INGRESS/EGRESS AGREEMENT D.B. 891 PG
1644 97.6' \pxqc;APPROX CL VEPCO ESMT D.B. 365 PG. 520 10' C & P TEL. CO RIGHT - OF - WAY D.B. 594 PG. 680 S KING STREET ~ asphalt ~ concrete 340.6 341.4 339.6 341.7 340.5 339.7 338.6
340.5 337.4 339.6 336.4 337.7 336.7 334.8 338.8 335.6 337.5 336.5 335.6 337.6 335.6 335.5 335.4 336.9 334.7 335.6 335.7 336.6 336.8 335.3 336.4 335.5 334.8 334.6 334.8 335.7 337.4 335.4
334.6 335.1 335.7 336.9 333.7 337.6 333.5 336.1 333.5 335.4 336.8 334.6 332.6 334.3 334.2 334.6 335.5 337.4 336.3 333.2 332.5 331.4 333.5 334.4 335.7 330.5 332.4 333.7 333.7 332.5 331.5
329.4 329.6 329.5 332.8 328.4 329.6 329.4 329.6 332.6 332.6 328.5 328.4 331.8 327.4 327.6 327.3 326.5 326.5 326.6 ~ asphalt ~ 331.6 326.5 324.4 331.4 325.8 325.5 323.8 324.7 325.5 330.5
324.6 330.7 330.6 328.7 323.5 324.4 323.5 322.5 329.5 329.6 323.4 326.5 333.6 322.5 329.7 327.6 324.5 328.4 322.7 321.3 328.6 325.5 327.5 324.6 326.5 328.5 320.2 323.3 322.8 326.5 327.4
327.7 319.4 331.6 327.8 324.2 330.3 327.5 326.7 329.6 325.4 322.7 324.7 326.4 326.5 conc. 325.6 323.4 321.7 326.4 325.6 328.2 320.6 322.6 323.6 324.6 325.6 318.6 319.4 323.7 323.5 323.6
318.5 324.5 322.4 322.8 324.5 325.1 321.7 323.6 324.4 323.6 319.3 324.3 318.6 321.7 322.6 323.5 320.4 323.4 324.5 321.5 322.4 316.6 322.6 322.6 320.5 322.3 322.4 321.6 319.5 321.8 320.7
311.8 321.5 318.5 320.4 320.5 310.7 321.5 310.7 308.1 320.5 309.4 319.7 321.6 318.5 310.5 319.3 320.7 308.2 319.6 318.6 321.7 316.7 317.3 317.2 317.6 317.6 320.6 318.6 319.6 318.1 321.6
318.5 316.5 317.6 316.4 320.5 321.4 322.4 318.2 315.5 318.4 315.5 317.4 314.6 313.6 318.3 313.5 312.6 318.5 311.6 311.5 318.4 317.9 301.4 310.5 309.3 309.5 300.3 308.5 308.6 308.3 301.4
299.6 309.5 299.3 307.6 298.8 302.7 300.4 299.4 300.7 294.5 306.3 301.4 2R 300.7 301.7 305.4 300.6 299.4 301.6 302.8 299.5 304.2 298.8 303.4 304.5 304.8 296.8 304.3 302.4 301.6 303.5
300.3 301.5 303.5 302.3 300.8 301.6 301.7 302.5 302.0 301.2 301.1 301.6 4.1' 18 I J K H G F E D C B A 17 16 15 13 14 12 7 6 5 19 20 11 38 37 8 9 10 4 3 2 1 21 22 27" rcp 21" rcp 21"
rcp 18" rcp 15" rcp18" rcp 21" rcp 21" rcp 21" rcp 30" rcp 30" rcp 24" rcp 24" rcp 24" rcp 24" rcp 42" rcp 42" rcp 24 26 28 30 128"x83" cmp 128"x83" cmp 128"x83" cmp 128"x83" cmp 23
25 27 29 31 32 18" rcp 15" rcp str 37 - es inv. out 15" rcp = 296.95' str 41 inv. in 24" rcp = 298.52' str 39inv. in 18" rcp = 298.76' str 42- ew inv. in 24" rcp = 299.39' str 40- ew
inv. in 18" rcp = 299.46' 41 42 39 40 24" rcp 18" rcp 24"x36" elip 24"x36" elip 35 34 33 8" SAN SEW 8" SAN SEW 8" SAN SEW 8" SAN SEW 8" SAN SEW 8" SAN SEW 8" SAN SEW 8" SAN SEW 8" SAN
SEW c.o. SAN LAT SAN LAT APPROX. LOCATION VEPCO ESMT D.B. 509 PG 86 APPROX CL VEPCO ESMT D.B. 365 PG. 520 302 304 306 308 330 334 334 336 332 330 328 326 324 336 334 332 330 328 334
332 330 328 \pxt1;320 328 330 308 306 308 310 300 308 322 318 320 306 310 308 322 310 316 314 312 336 310 312 314 316 318 320 322 324 326 328 310 314 318 320 322 324 326 328 330 326
320 322 324 332 330 328 340 338 336 334 332 326 324 322 318 316 314 312 310 306 304 302 322 320 318 316 316 314 312 310 308 300 298 300 298 300 298 306 304 302 300 S 66°47'37" E 11.73'
EX. EP EX. EP EX. SHOULDER FAIRFAX STREET SE \pxqc;FLOODPLAN OVERLAY DISTRICT \pxqc;FLOODPLAN OVERLAY DISTRICT \pxqc;FLOODPLAN OVERLAY DISTRICT \pxqc;FLOODPLAN OVERLAY DISTRICT \pxqc;50'
CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;50' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;50' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;50' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;150' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;150' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;150'
CREEK VALLEY BUFFER { 231-18-0288 LEE, GARY O & CAROLYN B BOOK 1383 PAGE1723 MONROE MANOR }SECTION 1 LOT 10 {231-18-2082 FOLEY, NORMAN C & GLENDA KAY AUSTIN} SECTION 1, LOT 11 PIN #
231-17-6960 N/F:BARRY, DELANEY S & TRIS JOSEPH II INST. # 201612020082097 PIN # 231-17-8292 N/F: KEYS, MATTHEW TIMOTHY & ANYA ELIZABETH INST. # 201801050000941 PIN # 231-17-7574 N/F:
GARVEY, CARRIE K R & PETER J INST. # 200309290127328 PIN # 231-17-7778 N/F: BAKER, WADE H & EMILEY M INST. # 200908110054916 PIN # 231-17-7982 N/F: WHISLER, MICHAEL C INST. # 201702270012219
PIN # 231-17-8087 N/F: LAKE, DEAN T INST. # 200709250069730 PIN # 231-17-8190 N/F: CLEMONS, ANN MOSS & DANEIL R TEES INST. # 200809250058122 PIN # 231-17-7368 N/F: CHAMBLIN, JAMES CHRISTOPHER
& CHAMBLIN, LYNDSAY WELSH INST. # 201812170072050 PIN # 231-17-8496 N/F: PAICE, RHONDA WILSON & ROGERS, LEO P JR INST. # 201907120038355 PIN # 231-18-6244 MADISON HOUSE ASSOCIATES II
LP INSTR. # 200311140151147 PIN # 231-18-7370 {TOWN OF LEESBURG D.B. 874 PG 210} PIN # 231-17-7102 CHAE S. RILEY INSTR. # 200308060101379 PIN # 231-18-4473 MADISON HOUSE ASSOCIATES
II LP INSTR. # 200311140151147 PIN # 231-17-6450 WILLIAM DEAN MILLER FAMILY LLC INST. # 200808250051570 PIN # 231-17-5821 C. R. KING STREET LLC D.B. 1890 PG. 89 324 323 323 322 321
\pxqc;APPROX. LOC. EX. 8" W/M 0+00.00 1+00.00 2+00.00 3+00.00 4+00.00 5+00.00 6+00.00 7+00.00 8+00.00 9+00.00 10+00.00 11+00.00 12+00.00 13+00.00 14+00.00 15+00.00 15+31.37 (URBAN BOULEVARD)
(URBAN BOULEVARD) STR 23 - inv = 293.71' STR 25 - inv = 293.41' STR 27 - inv = 293.44' STR 29 - inv = 293.71' str 18 - curb inlet top = 318.28' inv. out 18" rcp = 312.16' STR 17 -
CURB INLET TOP = 317.70' INV. IN FR 18- 15" RCP = 311.58' INV. OUT 18" RCP = 311.04' str 16 - curb inlet top = 316.52' inv. in fr 17 - 15" rcp = 310.68' inv. in fr 19- 18" rcp = 311.53'
inv. out 21" rcp = 306.59' str 15 - curb inlet top = 309.48' inv. in 21" rcp = 301.95' inv. out 21" rcp = 300.83' str 13 - mh top = 309.27' inv. in fr 15 - 21" rcp = 299.45' inv.
in fr 12 - 21" rcp = 303.93' inv. out 27" rcp = 299.44' str 14 - es 27" inv out = 296.32 str 12 - mh top = 318.24' inv. in 21" rcp = 307.01' inv. out 21" rcp = 306.84' str 11 - top
grate = 316.76' inv. out 21" rcp = 309.59' str 6 - top = 311.17' inv. in 42" rcp = 303.27' inv. out 42" rcp str 6 - es inv. out 42" rcp = 302.03' str 19- curb inlet top = 317.07'
inv. in fr 20- 18" rcp = 311.53' inv. out 18" rcp = 311.50' str 20 - curb inlet top = 317.35' inv. out 18" rcp = 312.80' str 8 - top curb inlet = 322.17' inv. in fr 9 - 30" rcp =
309.55' inv. out 30" rcp = 309.38' str 9 - top grate = 322.24' inv. in fr 10 - 21" rcp = 316.91' str 10 - top grate = 322.36' inv. out 21" rcp = 317.51' str 5 - top = 317.99' inv.
in 24" rcp = 310.84' inv. in 30" rcp = 305.47' inv. out 42" rcp = str 4 - top = 318.55' inv. in 24" rcp = 313.59' inv. out 24" rcp = 313.30' str 22- curb inlet top = 326.79' inv.
in 15" rcp = 322.24' str 21- curb inlet top = 326.27' inv. out 15" rcp = 322.40' str 30 inv = 292.41' str 28 - inv = 292.66' str 26 - inv = 292.53' str 24 - inv = 292.55'str 32 - 18"
rcp end wall = 295.49' str 31 - 18" rcp - inv 295.33' str 38- ew inv. in 15" rcp = 297.86' str 41 inv. in 24" rcp = 298.52' str 39inv. in 18" rcp = 298.76' str 42- ew inv. in 24" rcp
= 299.39' str 40- ew inv. in 18" rcp = 299.46' str 35 - ew 24x36" inv out = 296.63 str 33 - ew 24x36" inv out = 296.42 str 34 - curb inlet - 24x36" inv out = 297.05 STR 17 - CURB INLET
TOP = 317.70' INV. IN FR 18- 15" RCP = 311.58' INV. OUT 18" RCP = 311.04' 24" rcp 24" rcp 24" rcp 24" rcp \pxqc;APPROX. LOC. EX. 6" W/M \pxqc;150' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;150' CREEK
VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;150' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER 311.83 312.42 312.26 312.59312.64 312.89 312.09 311.88 311.63 311.99 311.72 311.76 311.48311.62 311.50 310.91 310.25310.97 314.59 313.62
312.49 311.87 311.85 311.69 311.52 311.38 311.28 311.37 311.24 313.46 312.34 311.78 311.75 311.57 311.52 311.28 311.25 311.29 311.18 10" PVC INV=312.48 10" PVC INV=312.03 BENCH BENCH
314.47 67B 13B84B 69A 84C 84B 90B 02A 84C 90B 02A 04A 02A 90B 13B 67B 225 Item a. 07/03/19 ΡΒ≅Κ∆9 ΡΓ∆∆Σ ΕΗΚ∆ Μν− Οκµµδθρ ∆µφηµδδθρ Κµχρβοδ ≅θβγησδβσρ Κµχ Ρτθυδξνθρ Τθαµ+ Κσχ−
ϖϖϖ−τθαµ,κσχ−βνλ Σδκ− 6/2−531−7/7/ ≅µµµχκδ+ Υηθφηµη 11//2 6601 Κησσκδ Θηυδθ Στθµοηϕδ TM ΟΚ≅Μ Χ≅Σ∆ No.DATEDESCRIPTION Θ∆ΥΗΡΗΝΜΡ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΥΗΚΚ≅Φ∆ ΣΝςΜ ΝΕ Κ∆∆ΡΑΤΘΦ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΨΟ,130/
ΨΝΜΗΜΦ Λ≅Ο ≅Λ∆ΜΧΛ∆ΜΣ Ε ∆ Μ Η Φ Μν−/11/37 Χ≅ΥΗΧ Σ− Λβ∆ΚΓ≅Μ∆Ξ Γ Ν ς Μ Ν Λ Λ Κ ≅ Σ ∆ Β Ο Θ Ν Μ Η Υ Ε Ν Η Θ Φ Η Θ ≅ ∆ ∆ ≅ Ρ Ν Μ Η Ρ ∆ Μ Κ 10/27/2021 07/03/19FIRST SUBMISSION 1 02/27/20
02/27/20SECOND SUBMISSION 2 09/25/20 09/25/20THIRD SUBMISSION 3 03/12/21 03/12/21FOURTH SUBMISSION 4 06/29/21 06/29/21FIFTH SUBMISSION 5 10/27/21FINAL PLANNING COMMISSION SET 6 10/27/21
ΝΥ∆ΘΥΗ∆ς Β3,/0 0&<7/& 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE080 80 160 80 32040 N VA. STATE GRID NORTH 4 bol5R ch 4R 2 gm bol gm ch ch ch 5R gm gm 4R 5R ch gm 4R vent ~ asphalt
~ ~ asphalt ~ ~ asphalt ~ ~ asphalt ~ ~ asphalt ~ ~ asphalt ~ ~ asphalt ~ ~ asphalt ~ ~ asphalt ~ ~ asphalt ~ concrete 2 gm 2 bol eb 2 bol 2 bol 2 bol ws ws ws (typ) ws (typ) gv 4 bol
ep ep ep ws (typ) dig 2R gm 2 bol ep conc. 7R 6R gm 3 bol 4R 19R ~ dirt ~ ~ grass ~ ~ grass ~ ~ grass ~ worn foot path 8' gravel drive ~ asphalt ~ ep ep ep ep a/c units on raised platform
dumpster bol ~ asphalt ~ ~ asphalt ~ ~ asphalt ~ ~ asphalt ~ brick paver s/w dig dig dig dig dig dig ssmh sdmh sdmh sdmh sdmh sdmh sdmh sdmh ssmh ssmh roof overhang over conc. s/w ~
grass ~ ep roof overhang over conc. s/w roof overhang over conc. s/w covered conc. s/w covered conc. s/w drive-through canopy drive-through canopy conc. s/w conc. s/w speed bump speed
bump speed bump lsa lsa lsa lsa lsa lsa lsa lsa lsa lsa 2R lsa 5R ~ asphalt ~ ~ asphalt ~ ~ asphalt ~ vb vb vb tb tb tbcb tb conc. barriers conc. s/w hand rail ssmh ssmh ssmh ssmh ssmh
sdmh sdmh sdmh 2 bol 2 gm 2 gm 2 gm 2 gm gm gm cofdccowater meter vault w / 4 bollards conc. conc. conc. conc. conc. conc. conc. conc. 6R water meter vault w / 4 bollards water meter
vault w / 4 bollards conc. conc. sdmh sdmh sdmh sdmh sdmh sdmhWells Fargo sign ssmh a/c units on raised platform a/c units on raised platform 4' metal barrier a/c units on raised platform
a/c units on raised platform a/c units on raised platform 2 bol 2 bol electric transformer on conc. pad conc. end wall 24" rcp conc. end wall 18" rcp sdmh conc. end wall asphalt trail
asphalt trail riprap conc. end wall tmh conc. end wall 2 gm 2 gm 2 gm co 7 gm a/c units on raised platform a/c units on raised platform a/c units on raised platform 4' metal barrier
a/c unit co conc. conc. fdc fdca/c units electric boxes conc. wm wm conc. electric box on conc. pad comcast boxes within fence bol bol 5.0'x8.4' brick A.T.M. overhang 2R wm conc. s/w
conc. s/w conc. s/w conc. s/w conc. s/w bol conc. s/w conc. s/w conc. s/w conc. s/w fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fcfc gv fc fc fc fc fc fc
fc fc conc. s/w roof overhang over conc. s/w ws (typ) a/c units electric boxes retaining wall bol metal hand rail co em electric box 3 bol gm 2 wm 2R 2R 1R 1R 1R co co ssmh 3 bol gm
em gv em a/ca/c bol wm wm gm ev ev electric boxes em Virginia Village sign sdmh tel ped tel ped fc fc speed bump conc. conc. conc. communicatio ns vault ev ev ev ev gv conc. s/w 6'
chain link fence vault lsa lsa lsa lsa lsalsa lsa fc fc fc fc fc wm gravel drive gm6' chain link fence co fc fc fc conc. barriers tb tel ped 21 12 7 21 21 21 21 21 18 7 5 9 17 17 11
6 5 23 5 28 14 12 10 20 23 26 17 18 23 23 27 19 12 12 10 3 roof overhang 4' metal barrier 4' metal barrier 4' metal barrier 4' metal barrier 4' metal barrier raised loading dock raised
loading dock 8'x12' shed 0.6' off of property line 24'x36' garage wood fencegate wood fence wood fencewire fence wm 2.8' 0.9' 10'x14' shed mail box roof overhang covered stairway 16
not a space retaining wall dilapidated structure attached to building TEMPORARY CUL DE SAC ESMT AS SHOWN ON PLAT REC PLAT CAB C SLOT 203 PG 5 CL VEPCO ESMT D.B. 365 PG 520 APPROX. CL
VEPCO ESMT D.B. 367 PG 501 \pxqc;APPROX CL VEPCO ESMT D.B. 365 PG. 520 FAIRFAX STREET SE N 23°12'07" E 99.83' N 24°00'40" E 100.98' S 65°44'50" E 62.01' N 18°51'56" E 317.27' S 71°06'22"
E 350.00' S 18°54'15" W 349.58' N 23°12'16" E 60.00' N 66°47'44" W 128.01' 10' C & P TEL. CO RIGHT - OF - WAY D.B. 594 PG. 680 \pxqc;10' SAN. SEWER ESMT D.B. 403 PG. 227 APPROX. CL
VEPCO ESMT D.B. 365 PG 520 15' UTILITY ESMT D.B. 403 PG. 227 \pxqc;10' SAN. SEWER ESMT D.B. 403 PG. 227 APPROX LOCATION 10' STORM DRAIN ESMT D.B. 403 PG. APPROX LOCATION 10' STORM
DRAIN ESMT D.B. 403 PG. 227 15' UTILITY ESMT D.B. 403 PG. 227 \pxqc;10' SAN. SEWER ESMT D.B. 403 PG. 227 CL VEPCO ESMT D.B. 372 PG 512 CATOCTIN CIRCLE SE N 66°47'44" W 233.20' N 23°12'16"
E 100.00' N 66°47'44" W 100.00' S 23°12'16" W 100.00' N 23°12'16" E 350.00' S 89°56'00" W 29.74' N 23°25'29" E 11.77' APPROX CL VEPCO ESMT D.B. 365 PG. 520 APPROX LOC. C & P ESMT D.B.
528 PG. 477 15' UTILITY ESMT D.B. 403 PG. 227 15' UTILITY ESMT D.B. 403 PG. 227 N 66°47'44" W 14.80' 10' C & P ESMT D.B. 504 PG. 254 APPROX. LOCATION VEPCO ESMT D.B. 509 PG 86 APPROX.
LOCATION VEPCO ESMT D.B. 811 PG 1179 INGRESS & EGRESS ESMT D.B. 1007 PG 393 APPROX. LOCATION VEPCO ESMT D.B. 1070 PG 117 INGRESS & EGRESS ESMT D.B. 810 PG 429 STORM SEWER ESMT D.B.
1007 PG 393 HARRISON STREET SE CATOCTIN CIRCLE APROX CL VEPCO ESMT D.B. 365 PG. 520 WATERLINE ESMT D.B. 1577 PG. 2110 15' UTILITY ESMT D.B. 356 PG. 498 N 59°34'51" E 323.58' S 08°13'41"
E 616.79' C1 S 47°54'41" W 42.48' S 72°49'09" W 52.79' C5 C6 C3 15' VA. POWER ESMT D.B. 935 PG 1476 10' WATERLINE ESMT D.B. 1007 PG 393 APPROX. LOCATION VEPCO ESMT D.B. 997 PG 948
5' SAN. SEWER ESMT D.B. 1007 PG 393 5' SAN. SEWER ESMT D.B. 1007 PG 393 \pxqc;10' SAN. SEWER ESMT D.B. 403 PG 227 10' WATERLINE ESMT STORM SEWER ESMT D.B. 1007 PG 393 25' SAN. SEWER
ESMT D.B. 1007 PG 393 10' WATERLINE ESMT D.B. 1007 PG 393 \pxqc;APPROX LOCATION VEPCO ESMT D.B. 1821 PG 2372 20' SAN. SEWER ESMT D.B. 403 PG 227, & D.B. 1007 PG 393 10' WATERLINE
EASEMENT D.B. 1007 PG 393 10' BELL ATLANTIC ESMT D.B. 1439 PG. APPROX. LOCATION BELL ATLANTIC ESMT D.B. 1821 PG. 2378 55' STORM DRAINAGE ESMT D.B. 661 PG. 626 APPROX LOCATION BELL
ATLANTIC ESMT D.B. 1821 PG. 2378 10' C & P TEL. CO RIGHT - OF - WAY 10' BELL ATLANTIC ESMT D.B. 730 PG. 162 D.B. 1439 PG. 366 25' STORM DRAIN ESMT INST #20160212-0007940 16' TRAIL
ESMT INST # 20160212-0007940 15' SLOPE MAINTENANCE ESMT D.B. 793 PG. 137 STORM DRAINAGE ESMT D.B. 793 PG. 137 APPROX. CL VEPCO RIGHT OF WAY D.B. 365 PG. 520 30' UTILITY ESMT D.B. 358
PG. 498 10' C & P TEL. CO RIGHT OF - WAY D.B. 594 PG. 680 10' C & P TEL. CO RIGHT - OF - WAY D.B. 720 PG. 776 APPROX CL VEPCO RIGHT OF WAY D.B. 365 PG. 520 20' STORM SEWER ESMT D.B.
1007 PG 393 10' C & P TEL. CO ESMT D.B. 730 PG. 10' BELL ATLANTIC ESMT D.B. 1439 PG. 366 40' DRAINAGE ESMT D.B. 358 PG.APPROX. CL VEPCO RIGHT OF WAY D.B. 365 PG. \pxqc;15' SLOPE
MAINTENANCE ESMT D.B. 793 PG. 137 \pxqc;16' TRAIL ESMT INST # 20160212-0007940 S 66°47'44" E 2.80' (EX. 70' R.O.W.) (EX. 70' R.O.W.) (EX. 70' R.O.W.) (EX. 50' R.O.W.) MADISON COURT
FEMA REGULATORY FLOODWAY REGULATORY FLOODWAY (SEE NOTE 5) S 08°13'41" E 616.79' 299.8 NO PARKING NO PARKING S 78°42'25" E 4.92' N 10°52'32" E 7.66' 0.9' FEMA REGULATORY FLOODWAY &
FEMA REGULATORY FLOODWAY & FEMA ZONE "X" (SEE NOTE 5) 55' STORM DRAINAGE ESMT D.B. 661 PG 626 S 66°00'35" E 415.54' S 66°00'35" E 415.54' FEMA ZONE "X" (SEE NOTE 5) \pxqc;10' WALK WAY
ESMT D.B. 790 PG. 597 0.4' N 66°00'35" W 415.54' APPARENT OVERLAP LINE PER D.B. 708 PG.37 LINE PER D.B. 349 PG. 229 APPARENT OVERLAP LINE PER D.B. 708 PG.37 LINE PER D.B. 349 PG. 229
INGRESS/EGRESS AGREEMENT D.B. 891 PG 1644 97.6' \pxqc;APPROX CL VEPCO ESMT D.B. 365 PG. 520 10' C & P TEL. CO RIGHT - OF - WAY D.B. 594 PG. 680 S KING STREET ~ asphalt ~ concrete 340.6
341.4 339.6 341.7 340.5 339.7 338.6 340.5 337.4 339.6 336.4 337.7 336.7 334.8 338.8 335.6 337.5 336.5 335.6 337.6 335.6 335.5 335.4 336.9 334.7 335.6 335.7 336.6 336.8 335.3 336.4 335.5
334.8 334.6 334.8 335.7 337.4 335.4 334.6 335.1 335.7 336.9 333.7 337.6 333.5 336.1 333.5 335.4 336.8 334.6 332.6 334.3 334.2 334.6 335.5 337.4 336.3 333.2 332.5 331.4 333.5 334.4 335.7
330.5 332.4 333.7 333.7 332.5 331.5 329.4 329.6 329.5 332.8 328.4 329.6 329.4 329.6 332.6 332.6 328.5 328.4 331.8 327.4 327.6 327.3 326.5 326.5 326.6 ~ asphalt ~ 331.6 326.5 324.4 331.4
325.8 325.5 323.8 324.7 325.5 330.5 324.6 330.7 330.6 328.7 323.5 324.4 323.5 322.5 329.5 329.6 323.4 326.5 333.6 322.5 329.7 327.6 324.5 328.4 322.7 321.3 328.6 325.5 327.5 324.6 326.5
328.5 320.2 323.3 322.8 326.5 327.4 327.7 319.4 331.6 327.8 324.2 330.3 327.5 326.7 329.6 325.4 322.7 324.7 326.4 326.5 conc. 325.6 323.4 321.7 326.4 325.6 328.2 320.6 322.6 323.6 324.6
325.6 318.6 319.4 323.7 323.5 323.6 318.5 324.5 322.4 322.8 324.5 325.1 321.7 323.6 324.4 323.6 319.3 324.3 318.6 321.7 322.6 323.5 320.4 323.4 324.5 321.5 322.4 316.6 322.6 322.6 320.5
322.3 322.4 321.6 319.5 321.8 320.7 311.8 321.5 318.5 320.4 320.5 310.7 321.5 310.7 308.1 320.5 309.4 319.7 321.6 318.5 310.5 319.3 320.7 308.2 319.6 318.6 321.7 316.7 317.3 317.2 317.6
317.6 320.6 318.6 319.6 318.1 321.6 318.5 316.5 317.6 316.4 320.5 321.4 322.4 318.2 315.5 318.4 315.5 317.4 314.6 313.6 318.3 313.5 312.6 318.5 311.6 311.5 318.4 317.9 301.4 310.5 309.3
309.5 300.3 308.5 308.6 308.3 301.4 299.6 309.5 299.3 307.6 298.8 302.7 300.4 299.4 300.7 294.5 306.3 301.4 2R 300.7 301.7 305.4 300.6 299.4 301.6 302.8 299.5 304.2 298.8 303.4 304.5
304.8 296.8 304.3 302.4 301.6 303.5 300.3 301.5 303.5 302.3 300.8 301.6 301.7 302.5 302.0 301.2 301.1 301.6 4.1' 18 I J K H G F E D C B A 17 16 15 13 14 12 7 6 5 19 20 11 38 37 8 9
10 4 3 2 1 21 22 27" rcp 21" rcp 21" rcp 18" rcp 15" rcp18" rcp 21" rcp 21" rcp 21" rcp 30" rcp 30" rcp 24" rcp 24" rcp 24" rcp 24" rcp 42" rcp 42" rcp 24 26 28 30 128"x83" cmp 128"x83"
cmp 128"x83" cmp 128"x83" cmp 23 25 27 29 31 32 18" rcp 15" rcp str 37 - es inv. out 15" rcp = 296.95' str 41 inv. in 24" rcp = 298.52' str 39inv. in 18" rcp = 298.76' str 42- ew inv.
in 24" rcp = 299.39' str 40- ew inv. in 18" rcp = 299.46' 41 42 39 40 24" rcp 18" rcp 24"x36" elip 24"x36" elip 35 34 33 8" SAN SEW 8" SAN SEW 8" SAN SEW 8" SAN SEW 8" SAN SEW 8" SAN
SEW 8" SAN SEW 8" SAN SEW 8" SAN SEW c.o. SAN LAT SAN LAT APPROX. LOCATION VEPCO ESMT D.B. 509 PG 86 APPROX CL VEPCO ESMT D.B. 365 PG. 520 302 304 306 308 330 334 334 336 332 330 328
326 324 336 334 332 330 328 334 332 330 328 \pxt1;320 328 330 308 306 308 310 300 308 322 318 320 306 310 308 322 310 316 314 312 336 310 312 314 316 318 320 322 324 326 328 310 314
318 320 322 324 326 328 330 326 320 322 324 332 330 328 340 338 336 334 332 326 324 322 318 316 314 312 310 306 304 302 322 320 318 316 316 314 312 310 308 300 298 300 298 300 298 306
304 302 300 S 66°47'37" E 11.73' EX. EP EX. EP EX. SHOULDER FAIRFAX STREET SE \pxqc;FLOODPLAN OVERLAY DISTRICT \pxqc;FLOODPLAN OVERLAY DISTRICT \pxqc;FLOODPLAN OVERLAY DISTRICT \pxqc;FLOODPLAN
OVERLAY DISTRICT \pxqc;50' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;50' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;50' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;50' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;150' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;150' CREEK
VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;150' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER { 231-18-0288 LEE, GARY O & CAROLYN B BOOK 1383 PAGE1723 MONROE MANOR }SECTION 1 LOT 10 {231-18-2082 FOLEY, NORMAN C & GLENDA KAY AUSTIN}
SECTION 1, LOT 11 PIN # 231-17-6960 N/F:BARRY, DELANEY S & TRIS JOSEPH II INST. # 201612020082097 PIN # 231-17-8292 N/F: KEYS, MATTHEW TIMOTHY & ANYA ELIZABETH INST. # 201801050000941
PIN # 231-17-7574 N/F: GARVEY, CARRIE K R & PETER J INST. # 200309290127328 PIN # 231-17-7778 N/F: BAKER, WADE H & EMILEY M INST. # 200908110054916 PIN # 231-17-7982 N/F: WHISLER, MICHAEL
C INST. # 201702270012219 PIN # 231-17-8087 N/F: LAKE, DEAN T INST. # 200709250069730 PIN # 231-17-8190 N/F: CLEMONS, ANN MOSS & DANEIL R TEES INST. # 200809250058122 PIN # 231-17-7368
N/F: CHAMBLIN, JAMES CHRISTOPHER & CHAMBLIN, LYNDSAY WELSH INST. # 201812170072050 PIN # 231-17-8496 N/F: PAICE, RHONDA WILSON & ROGERS, LEO P JR INST. # 201907120038355 PIN # 231-18-6244
MADISON HOUSE ASSOCIATES II LP INSTR. # 200311140151147 PIN # 231-18-7370 {TOWN OF LEESBURG D.B. 874 PG 210} PIN # 231-17-7102 CHAE S. RILEY INSTR. # 200308060101379 PIN # 231-18-4473
MADISON HOUSE ASSOCIATES II LP INSTR. # 200311140151147 PIN # 231-17-6450 WILLIAM DEAN MILLER FAMILY LLC INST. # 200808250051570 PIN # 231-17-5821 C. R. KING STREET LLC D.B. 1890 PG.
89 324 323 323 322 321 \pxqc;APPROX. LOC. EX. 8" W/M 0+00.00 1+00.00 2+00.00 3+00.00 4+00.00 5+00.00 6+00.00 7+00.00 8+00.00 9+00.00 10+00.00 11+00.00 12+00.00 13+00.00 14+00.00 15+00.00
15+31.37 (URBAN BOULEVARD) (URBAN BOULEVARD) STR 23 - inv = 293.71' STR 25 - inv = 293.41' STR 27 - inv = 293.44' STR 29 - inv = 293.71' str 18 - curb inlet top = 318.28' inv. out
18" rcp = 312.16' STR 17 - CURB INLET TOP = 317.70' INV. IN FR 18- 15" RCP = 311.58' INV. OUT 18" RCP = 311.04' str 16 - curb inlet top = 316.52' inv. in fr 17 - 15" rcp = 310.68'
inv. in fr 19- 18" rcp = 311.53' inv. out 21" rcp = 306.59' str 15 - curb inlet top = 309.48' inv. in 21" rcp = 301.95' inv. out 21" rcp = 300.83' str 13 - mh top = 309.27' inv. in
fr 15 - 21" rcp = 299.45' inv. in fr 12 - 21" rcp = 303.93' inv. out 27" rcp = 299.44' str 14 - es 27" inv out = 296.32 str 12 - mh top = 318.24' inv. in 21" rcp = 307.01' inv. out
21" rcp = 306.84' str 11 - top grate = 316.76' inv. out 21" rcp = 309.59' str 6 - top = 311.17' inv. in 42" rcp = 303.27' inv. out 42" rcp str 6 - es inv. out 42" rcp = 302.03' str
19- curb inlet top = 317.07' inv. in fr 20- 18" rcp = 311.53' inv. out 18" rcp = 311.50' str 20 - curb inlet top = 317.35' inv. out 18" rcp = 312.80' str 8 - top curb inlet = 322.17'
inv. in fr 9 - 30" rcp = 309.55' inv. out 30" rcp = 309.38' str 9 - top grate = 322.24' inv. in fr 10 - 21" rcp = 316.91' str 10 - top grate = 322.36' inv. out 21" rcp = 317.51' str
5 - top = 317.99' inv. in 24" rcp = 310.84' inv. in 30" rcp = 305.47' inv. out 42" rcp = str 4 - top = 318.55' inv. in 24" rcp = 313.59' inv. out 24" rcp = 313.30' str 22- curb inlet
top = 326.79' inv. in 15" rcp = 322.24' str 21- curb inlet top = 326.27' inv. out 15" rcp = 322.40' str 30 inv = 292.41' str 28 - inv = 292.66' str 26 - inv = 292.53' str 24 - inv
= 292.55'str 32 - 18" rcp end wall = 295.49' str 31 - 18" rcp - inv 295.33' str 38- ew inv. in 15" rcp = 297.86' str 41 inv. in 24" rcp = 298.52' str 39inv. in 18" rcp = 298.76' str
42- ew inv. in 24" rcp = 299.39' str 40- ew inv. in 18" rcp = 299.46' str 35 - ew 24x36" inv out = 296.63 str 33 - ew 24x36" inv out = 296.42 str 34 - curb inlet - 24x36" inv out =
297.05 STR 17 - CURB INLET TOP = 317.70' INV. IN FR 18- 15" RCP = 311.58' INV. OUT 18" RCP = 311.04' 24" rcp 24" rcp 24" rcp 24" rcp \pxqc;APPROX. LOC. EX. 6" W/M \pxqc;150' CREEK
VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;150' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;150' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER 311.83 312.42 312.26 312.59312.64 312.89 312.09 311.88 311.63 311.99 311.72 311.76 311.48311.62 311.50 310.91
310.25310.97 314.59 313.62 312.49 311.87 311.85 311.69 311.52 311.38 311.28 311.37 311.24 313.46 312.34 311.78 311.75 311.57 311.52 311.28 311.25 311.29 311.18 10" PVC INV=312.48 10"
PVC INV=312.03 BENCH BENCH 314.47 24 60 25 10 23 20 22 20 24 20 30 20 27 00 26 30 25 80 25 30 25 30 24 20 23 40 24 40 25 60 27 50 27 50 25 40 26 90 27 20 12 00 12 70 12 50 12 90 07
60 08 40 19 40 19 40 18 80 19 40 22 40 22 40 22 20 22 30 23 00 22 35 22 03 22 20 23 0023 00 25 00 27 00 27 80 3140 30 80 24 00 25 10 27 50 1.4%%% 324 326 324 326 322 320 318 316 314
314 320 316 318 308 310 312 328 330 326 324 322 320 318 316 20 00 322 22 20 322 322 PROP. SAN. SEW. PROP. SAN. SEW. PROP. SAN. SEW. PROP. SAN. SEW. PROP. W/M PROP. W/M PROP. W/M PROP.
W/M PROP. W/M PROP. W/M ESMT PROP. W/M ESMTPROP. W/M ESMT PROP. SAN. ESMT. PROP. SAN. ESMT. LOC LOC LOC LOC LOC LOC LOC LOC LOC LOC LOC FAIRFAX ST SE \A1;26.0' \A1;26.0' \A1;24.0' \A1;24.0'
\A1;26.0' BUILDING F EX. ENTRANCE TO REMAIN (TO REMAIN) TO REMAIN EX. BUILDING GARAGE ENTRANCE LOADING ENTRANCE LOADING ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE LOADING ENTRANCE GARAGE
ENTRANCE LOADING ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE BUILDING E BUILDING D BUILDING C BUILDING B BUILDING A FF=322.40 FF=322.40 FF=322.40 FF=322.40 FF=320.00 FF=318.80
FF=321.70FF=322.60FF=330.20 FF=327.50 FF=327.50 FF=327.50 FF=326.50 FF=325.60 FF=325.00 FF=324.40 FF=324.20 FF=325.30 FF=325.30 FF=325.80 FF=326.30 FF=327.00 FF=327.80 13,400 SF BRIDGE
EYE 1 EYE 3 EYE 5 315' SIGHT DISTANCE (LEFT) OBJ. 315' SIGHT DISTANCE (LEFT) OBJ. 315' SIGHT DISTANCE (LEFT) OBJ. BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) BUILD
TO LINE (TYP.) BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) 22 40 22 40 1460 22 40 21 80 17 70 320 318 316 314 318 TW=315.80 BW=311.20TW=315.80
BW=311.00 TW=317.70 BW=304.50 TW=322.20 BW=322.20 TW=317.70 BW=305.00TW=321.20 BW=320.70 304 306 308 310 312 LOADING ENTRANCE TW=319.40 BW=303.50 TW=319.40 BW=304.00TW=319.40 BW=304.00
04 10 {\W0.75;STAIRS} FF=322.40 EXISTING WATER SERVICE TO RITE AID FROM EX. W/M IN CATOCTIN CIRCLE TO BE MAINTAINED. EXISTING WATER SERVICE TO RILEY PROPERTY FROM EX. W/M IN CATOCTIN
CIRCLE TO BE MAINTAINED. ONLY ONLY ONLY ONLY OBJ. EYE 2 335' SIGHT DISTANCE (RIGHT) OBJ.315' SIGHT DISTANCE (LEFT) OBJ. 335' SIGHT DISTANCE (RIGHT) OBJ. 315' SIGHT DISTANCE (LEFT) ONLY
ONLY \A1;15.0' \A1;24.0' \A1;15.0' \A1;15.0' \A1;15.0' \A1;15.0' 22.0' (TYP.) \A1;40.0' 8.0' TYP. \A1;24.0' 24.0' TYP. \A1;15.0' \A1;28.1' \A1;29.9' \A1;9.9' \A1;19.8' \A1;18.1' \A1;30.0'
\A1;%%P220' SIGHT DISTANCE ESMT SIGHT DISTANCE ESMT SIGHT DISTANCE ESMT SIGHT DISTANCE ESMT SIGHT DISTANCE ESMT SIGHT DISTANCE ESMT (1 LOADING SPACE AT 15'X30') (1 LOADING SPACE AT
15'X30') (1 LOADING SPACE AT 15'X30') (2 LOADING SPACES - 15'X30' AND 12'X30') (2 LOADING SPACES - 15'X30' AND 12'X30') \pxqr;EX. TRASH ENCLOSURE TO REMAIN THIS PORTION OF FAIRFAX STREET
WILL BE VACATED AS FURTHER COORDINATED WITH THE TOWN. NOTE THE VACATION OF FAIRFAX STREET IS NOT REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL OF THIS APPLICATION. HOWEVER, THE VACATION WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED
PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR ANY PORTION OF THIS PLAN. \pxqr;{\Fsimplex|c0;\T0.9;\C256;INTERSECTION SHALL BE A RAISED INTERSECTION AND BE SIGNALIZED AS WARRANTED AND COORDINATED
WITH VODT AND THE TOWN OF LEESBURG.} * \pxqr;POSSIBLE APPROX. ALTERNATE LIMITS OF CLEARING AND GRADING FOR EXCAVATION IN THE FLOODPLAIN TO MITIGATE RISE IN THE FLOODPLAIN WATER SURFACE
ELEVATION IF NECESSARY. (GENERAL STREET) EX. PUBLIC STREET (TO BE VACATED) \pxql;PROP. PRIVATE STREET 400 1,200 600 1,600 200 2,300 \pxqr;BIKE RACK (TYP.) \pxqr;BIKE RACK (TYP.) \pxqr;BIKE
RACK (TYP.) \pxqr;BIKE RACK (TYP.) \A1;%%P260' \A1;%%P300' \A1;%%P175' \A1;%%P115' \pxqr;LANDSCAPE WALL (NON-RESIDENTIAL) BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) \pxqr;EX. GUARDRAIL TO BE REMOVED AS NECESSARY
TO CONNECT TO EX. SIDEWALK {OURS OVERLOOK} (SEE L SERIES SHEETS FOR {HIGH STREET PARK} (SEE L SERIES SHEETS FOR DETAILS) \A1;28.5' HIGH STREET (PRIVATE GENERAL STREET) \pxql;POSSIBLE
WATER QUALITY STRUCTURE PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. SEW.
PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. ESMT. PROP. STM. ESMT. PROP. STM. ESMT. PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. ESMT. PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. ESMT. PROP. STM. ESMT. {\W0.8;PROP. OUTFALL
DITCH} \pxqr;EXISTING 42" RCP TO BE REMOVED. PRIVATE ROAD 'B' PRIVATE ROAD 'C' MADISON COURT PRIVATE ROAD 'A' ONE WAY MADISON COURT ONE WAY MADISON COURT PRIVATE ROAD 'D' (RESIDENTIAL)
(RESIDENTIAL) (PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL) (PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL) (RESIDENTIAL) (RESIDENTIAL) (PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL) (RESIDENTIAL) TW=315.00 BW=313.50 TW=315.00 BW=310.80 TW=314.00 BW=309.20
TW=311.00 BW=308.50 TW=316.50 BW=309.60 TW=320.00 BW=312.10 TW=321.00 BW=315.50 TW=322.20 BW=319.60 TW=323.40 BW=323.00 TW=331.25 331.00 TW=334.00 BW=331.00 TW=332.00 BW=330.00TW=328.50
BW=328.25 6' SCREEN WALL 6' SCREEN WALL RET. WALL WITH 6' SCREEN WALL ABOVE LOC LOC LOC LOC LOC LOC \pxqr;PROP. PRIVATE STREET \pxql;EX. PUBLIC STREET RET. WALL WITH 6' SCREEN WALL
POSS. CONNECTION TO CLEMONS PROPERTY 6' SCREEN WALL 6' SCREEN WALL RET. WALL BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) BUILD TO LINE (TYP.)
\pxqc;6' REINFORCED PEDESTRIAN AREA {COMMON GREEN} (SEE L SERIES SHEETS FOR DETAILS) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39
40 41 42 43 1 23 24 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 22 PROP. SAN. ESMT. PROP. SAN. ESMT. PROP. SAN. ESMT. PROP. SAN. ESMT. \A1;24.0' \A1;24.0' \A1;24.0' \A1;14.0' \A1;%%P31.0' \A1;24.0'
\A1;24.0' \A1;24.0' \A1;24.0' \A1;30.0' 22.0' (TYP). 8.0' (TYP.) \A1;12.0' \A1;24.0' \A1;%%P30.5' \A1;%%P30.5' \A1;%%P30.5' \A1;%%P30.5' \A1;24.0' \A1;14.0' \pxqc;MOUNTABLE CURB \pxqc;MOUNTABLE
CURB GAR= 321.13 FF=231.46 21 66 30 80 30 60 30 73 GAR= 319.82 FF=320.40 GAR= 321.86 FF=323.61 GAR= 321.86 FF=323.61 GAR= 321.36 FF=323.11 GAR= 320.40 FF=321.11 GAR= 329.96 FF=331.71
GAR= 327.20 FF=328.36 GAR= 326.29 FF=326.87 GAR= 323.86 FF=324.19 GAR= 329.26 FF=329.80 GAR= 325.50 FF=326.04 GAR= 323.31 FF=324.03 GAR= 326.54 FF=327.12 GAR= 323.90 FF=325.10 GAR=
328.60 FF=329.80 GAR= 324.20 FF=324.50 GAR= 328.20 FF=328.60 GAR= 319.80 FF=320.80 GAR= 323.50 FF=323.80 35 10 28 89 28 29 26 69 25 39 22 50 21 70 22 10 2170 22 40 GAR= 321.13 FF=221.46
GAR= 320.74 FF=221.07 22 40 2170 22 20 20 5020 70 24 40 23 50 22 90 23 50 324 324 324 322 322 320 320 320 320 320 322 322 322 324 322 322 324 326 328 330 328 326 324 322 324 326 328330
334 332 330 328 326 324 324 322 320 318 318 318 318 318 318 320 322 316 314 312 324 328 23 6026 90 27 60 25 20 24 30 324 322 322 324 324 318 316 314 318 316 322 326 324 326 TW=329.00
BW=326.50 TW=326.00 BW=326.00 TW=329.60 BW=328.50 22 00 23 30 22 20 21 34 21 10 20 70 22 10 20 00 18 50 19 30 17 90 1750 17 80 18 60 18 30 19 10 19 20 16 80 18 09 18 66 18 47 20 0722
5122 97 25 10 24 16 30 10 29 50 26 20 23 10 18 20 18 20 (2R) 322.10 318.30 17 80 STEPS REQUIRED TW=315.00 BW=314.50 PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. SEW. PROP.
STM. SEW. PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. ESMT. PROP. STM. ESMT. PROP. STM. ESMT. PROP. STM. ESMT. PROP. W/M ESMT PROP. W/M ESMT PROP. W/M
ESMT PROP. W/M ESMT PROP. W/M ESMT PROP. W/M ESMT \pxqr;EX. W/M TO BE REMOVED OR ABANDONED 316 314 312 310 308 316 314 312 06 30 RAMP LOC 1733 1783 1583 322 318 320 320 318 PROP. STM.
ESMT. \pxqc;STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ESMT. - PRIVATELY MAINTAINED PROP. STM. ESMT. \pxqc;STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ESMT. - PRIVATELY MAINTAINED PROP. W/M ESMT PROP. W/M ESMT PROP. STM. ESMT.
PROP. W/M ESMT PRIV. SAN. ESMT. PIER BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) \pxqr;BIKE RACK (TYP.) 2430 6' REMOVABLE WOOD SCREEN \pxql;BUS STOP. LOCATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE AT FINAL
ENGINEERING AS COORDINATED WITH THE TOWN RET. WALL WITH 6' SCREEN WALL ABOVE RET. WALL WITH 6' SCREEN WALL ABOVE 6' SCREEN WALL \pxql;FINAL TRAIL CONNECTION LOCATION SHALL BE IN SUBSTANTIAL
CONFORMANCE WITH THIS CONCEPT PLAN WITH REASONABLE ALLOWANCES TO BE MADE FOR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN ALTERATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH TOWN ZONING, SUBDIVISION, AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
AND AS COORDINATED WITH MADISON HOUSE ASSOCIATES. PROP. SAN. SEW. PROP. SAN. SEW. PROP. SAN. SEW. PROP. SAN. SEW. PROP. SAN. SEW. PROP. SAN. SEW. PROP. SAN. SEW. PROP. SAN. SEW. PROP.
SAN. SEW. PROP. SAN. SEW. PROP. SAN. SEW. PROP. R/W FOLLOWING VACATION OF FAIRFAX STREET. PRIV. SAN. ESMT. PRIV. SAN. LAT. PRIV. SAN. LAT. PRIV. SAN. LAT. PROP. SAN. ESMT. PROP. SAN.
ESMT. \pxql;EX. W/M TO BE REMOVED OR ABANDONED 99 00 02 30 RAMP PIER RAISED PLATFORM ABUTMENT LOC LOC LOC APPROX. LIMITS OF UG SWM FACILITY APPROX. LIMITS OF UG SWM FACILITY {\W0.8;PROP.
STM. SEW.} \pxql;PRIVATE \pxql;PUBLIC \pxql;PUBLIC R=12'R=10' R=15' R=15' R=12' R=10' R=25' R=24' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=44' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=44'
R=10' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=14' R=15' R=7.5' R=113' R=87' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=6' R=6' R=10' R=40' R=20'
R=40' R=40' R=40' R=40'R=45'R=45' R=40' R=40' * \A1;10.0' 22 20 \A1;15.0' \A1;16.2' EYE 2 EYE 5 EYE 1 EYE 3 EYE 4 \pxqr;NOTE: EX. DRY UTILITIES TO BE RELOCATED FROM THIS AREA TO CREATE
CORRIDOR FOR SANITARY SEWER \A1;23.0' \A1;25.0' THE APPLICANT UNDERSTANDS THAT ANY CHANGES TO THE FLOODPLAIN OR CHANNEL, NOT SHOWN ON THIS REZONING AND SPECIAL EXCEPTION APPLICATION,
AS WELL AS ANYTHING THAT MAY CAUSE A RISE IN THE FLOODPLAIN ON THIS OR ANY ADJACENT PROPERTIES WILL REQUIRE A NEW SPECIAL EXCEPTION PLAN, WHICH WILL INCLUDE ADDITIONAL MEETINGS WITH
THE TOWN COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION HEARINGS. \A1;10.0' 6' SCREEN WALL 6' SCREEN WALL \pxqc;APPROX. POSSIBLE LOCATION OF MAILBOX (TYP). EXACT LOCATIONS MAY VARY AT TIME OF SITE
PLAN. \A1;15.1' 316 SAN C/O (TYP.) \pxqc;6' REINFORCED PEDESTRIAN AREA BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) \A1;32.0' \A1;31.0' \A1;31.1' \A1;33.6' \A1;33.7'
\A1;31.0' PROP. SCREEN WALL 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE
4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 226 Item a. 07/03/19 ΡΒ≅Κ∆9 ΡΓ∆∆Σ ΕΗΚ∆ Μν− Οκµµδθρ ∆µφηµδδθρ Κµχρβοδ ≅θβγησδβσρ Κµχ Ρτθυδξνθρ Τθαµ+ Κσχ− ϖϖϖ−τθαµ,κσχ−βνλ Σδκ− 6/2−531−7/7/
≅µµµχκδ+ Υηθφηµη 11//2 6601 Κησσκδ Θηυδθ Στθµοηϕδ TM ΟΚ≅Μ Χ≅Σ∆ No.DATEDESCRIPTION Θ∆ΥΗΡΗΝΜΡ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΥΗΚΚ≅Φ∆ ΣΝςΜ ΝΕ Κ∆∆ΡΑΤΘΦ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΨΟ,130/ ΨΝΜΗΜΦ Λ≅Ο ≅Λ∆ΜΧΛ∆ΜΣ Ε ∆ Μ Η Φ Μν−/11/37
Χ≅ΥΗΧ Σ− Λβ∆ΚΓ≅Μ∆Ξ Γ Ν ς Μ Ν Λ Λ Κ ≅ Σ ∆ Β Ο Θ Ν Μ Η Υ Ε Ν Η Θ Φ Η Θ ≅ ∆ ∆ ≅ Ρ Ν Μ Η Ρ ∆ Μ Κ 10/27/2021 07/03/19FIRST SUBMISSION 1 02/27/20 02/27/20SECOND SUBMISSION 2 09/25/20 09/25/20THIRD
SUBMISSION 3 03/12/21 03/12/21FOURTH SUBMISSION 4 06/29/21 06/29/21FIFTH SUBMISSION 5 10/27/21FINAL PLANNING COMMISSION SET 6 10/27/21 ΒΝΜΒ∆ΟΣ ΟΚ≅Μ Β4,/0 0&<2/& 1 inch = ft. ( IN
FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE030 30 60 30 12015 N VA. STATE GRID NORTH {\Fcomplex|c0;MATCH LINE SEE SHEET C5-02} {\Fcomplex|c0;MATCH LINE SEE SHEET C5-04} 300 EX. FENCE EX. SANITARY SEWER EX.
STORM DRAIN EX. WATER LINE EX. FIRE HYDRANT PROPERTY LINE EX. CONTOUR EX. CURB & GUTTER EX. TREE LINE W X X %%ULEGEND PROP. CURB & GUTTER LOC PROP. CLEARING & GRADING LIMITS PROP.
LIGHT {NOTE: }1.SEE SHEET C12-1 FOR AREA SUBJECT TO PROPOSED TOWN PLAN AMENDMENT 2.SEE SHEET L6-01 FOR CROSSWALK DETAILS 3.FOR SHEET C5-01 - C5-04, PRIVATE ROADS AS DEFINED BY THE ZONING
ORDINANCE, THAT SERVE THE RESIDENTIAL PORTION OF THE PROJECT SHALL BE ADMINISTERED AS RESIDENTIAL COMMON PARKING COURTS UNDER THE DCSM AND SLDR PER TLZO. SEC.3.3.6.E.16. 4.NO SIGNAGE
OR OBSTRUCTIONS SUCH AS BENCHES OR TRASH CANS WILL BE PLACED IN THE 6' REINFORCED PEDESTRIAN AREA. 5.PROPER IDENTIFICATION OF THE 6' REINFORCED PEDESTRIAN AREA AS A FIRE LANE WILL BE
COORDINATED WITH THE FIRE MARSHALL AT THE TIME OF SITE PLAN. SCREEN WALL STEEP SLOPES APPROX. LOC. POSSIBLE MAILBOX FAIRFAX STREET SE N 23°12'07" E 99.83' N 24°00'40" E 100.98' S 65°44'50"
E 62.01' N 18°51'56" E 317.27' S 71°06'22" E 350.00' S 18°54'15" W 349.58' N 23°12'16" E 60.00' N 66°47'44" W 128.01' S 66°47'44" E 2.80' MADISON COURT S 66°00'35" E 415.54' 0.4' N
66°00'35" W 415.54' APPARENT OVERLAP LINE PER D.B. 708 PG.37 LINE PER D.B. 349 PG. 229 EX. EP EX. EP EX. SHOULDER FAIRFAX STREET SE { 231-18-0288 LEE, GARY O & CAROLYN B BOOK 1383 PAGE1723
MONROE MANOR }SECTION 1 LOT 10 {231-18-2082 FOLEY, NORMAN C & GLENDA KAY AUSTIN} SECTION 1, LOT 11 PIN # 231-17-6960 N/F:BARRY, DELANEY S & TRIS JOSEPH II INST. # 201612020082097 PIN
# 231-17-8292 N/F: KEYS, MATTHEW TIMOTHY & ANYA ELIZABETH INST. # 201801050000941 PIN # 231-17-7574 N/F: GARVEY, CARRIE K R & PETER J INST. # 200309290127328 PIN # 231-17-7778 N/F:
BAKER, WADE H & EMILEY M INST. # 200908110054916 PIN # 231-17-7982 N/F: WHISLER, MICHAEL C INST. # 201702270012219 PIN # 231-17-8087 N/F: LAKE, DEAN T INST. # 200709250069730 PIN #
231-17-8190 N/F: CLEMONS, ANN MOSS & DANEIL R TEES INST. # 200809250058122 PIN # 231-17-7368 N/F: CHAMBLIN, JAMES CHRISTOPHER & CHAMBLIN, LYNDSAY WELSH INST. # 201812170072050 PIN #
231-17-8496 N/F: PAICE, RHONDA WILSON & ROGERS, LEO P JR INST. # 201907120038355 PIN # 231-18-4473 MADISON HOUSE ASSOCIATES II LP INSTR. # 200311140151147 PIN # 231-17-6450 WILLIAM
DEAN MILLER FAMILY LLC INST. # 200808250051570 311.83 312.42 312.26 312.59312.64 312.89 312.09 311.88 311.63 311.99 311.72 311.76 311.48311.62 311.50 310.91 310.25310.97 314.59 313.62
312.49 311.87 311.85 311.69 311.52 311.38 311.28 311.37 311.24 313.46 312.34 311.78 311.75 311.57 311.52 311.28 311.25 311.29 311.18 314.47 LOC LOC FAIRFAX ST SE \A1;26.0' LOADING ENTRANCE
GARAGE ENTRANCE BUILDING B BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) (1 LOADING SPACE AT 15'X30') THIS PORTION OF FAIRFAX STREET WILL BE VACATED AS FURTHER COORDINATED WITH THE TOWN.
NOTE THE VACATION OF FAIRFAX STREET IS NOT REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL OF THIS APPLICATION. HOWEVER, THE VACATION WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR ANY PORTION OF THIS
PLAN. (GENERAL STREET) EX. PUBLIC STREET (TO BE VACATED) \pxql;PROP. PRIVATE STREET 2,300 \pxqr;BIKE RACK (TYP.) \A1;28.5' \pxqr;EXISTING 42" RCP TO BE REMOVED. PRIVATE ROAD 'B' PRIVATE
ROAD 'C' MADISON COURT PRIVATE ROAD 'A' ONE WAY MADISON COURT ONE WAY MADISON COURT PRIVATE ROAD 'D' (RESIDENTIAL) (RESIDENTIAL) (PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL) (PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL) (RESIDENTIAL)
(RESIDENTIAL) (PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL) (RESIDENTIAL) TW=315.00 BW=313.50 TW=315.00 BW=310.80 TW=314.00 BW=309.20 TW=311.00 BW=308.50 TW=316.50 BW=309.60 TW=320.00 BW=312.10 TW=321.00 BW=315.50
TW=322.20 BW=319.60 TW=323.40 BW=323.00 TW=331.25 331.00 TW=334.00 BW=331.00 TW=332.00 BW=330.00 TW=328.50 BW=328.25 6' SCREEN WALL 6' SCREEN WALL RET. WALL WITH 6' SCREEN WALL ABOVE
LOC LOC LOC LOC LOC LOC \pxqr;PROP. PRIVATE STREET \pxql;EX. PUBLIC STREET RET. WALL WITH 6' SCREEN WALL POSS. CONNECTION TO CLEMONS PROPERTY 6' SCREEN WALL 6' SCREEN WALL RET. WALL
BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) \pxqc;6' REINFORCED PEDESTRIAN AREA {COMMON GREEN} (SEE L SERIES SHEETS FOR
DETAILS) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 1 23 24 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 22 \A1;24.0' \A1;24.0' \A1;24.0'
\A1;14.0' \A1;%%P31.0' \A1;24.0' \A1;24.0' \A1;24.0' \A1;24.0' \A1;30.0' 22.0' (TYP). 8.0' (TYP.) \A1;12.0' \A1;24.0' \A1;%%P30.5' \A1;%%P30.5' \A1;%%P30.5' \A1;%%P30.5' \A1;24.0' \A1;14.0'
\pxqc;MOUNTABLE CURB \pxqc;MOUNTABLE CURB GAR= 321.13 FF=231.46 GAR= 319.82 FF=320.40 GAR= 321.86 FF=323.61 GAR= 321.86 FF=323.61 GAR= 321.36 FF=323.11 GAR= 320.40 FF=321.11 GAR= 329.96
FF=331.71 GAR= 327.20 FF=328.36 GAR= 326.29 FF=326.87 GAR= 323.86 FF=324.19 GAR= 329.26 FF=329.80 GAR= 325.50 FF=326.04 GAR= 323.31 FF=324.03 GAR= 326.54 FF=327.12 GAR= 323.90 FF=325.10
GAR= 328.60 FF=329.80 GAR= 324.20 FF=324.50 GAR= 328.20 FF=328.60 GAR= 319.80 FF=320.80 GAR= 323.50 FF=323.80 GAR= 321.13 FF=221.46 GAR= 320.74 FF=221.07 TW=329.00 BW=326.50 TW=326.00
BW=326.00 TW=329.60 BW=328.50 (2R) STEPS REQUIRED TW=315.00 BW=314.50 BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) \pxqr;BIKE RACK (TYP.) 6' REMOVABLE WOOD SCREEN RET. WALL WITH 6' SCREEN
WALL ABOVE RET. WALL WITH 6' SCREEN WALL ABOVE 6' SCREEN WALL \pxql;FINAL TRAIL CONNECTION LOCATION SHALL BE IN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE WITH THIS CONCEPT PLAN WITH REASONABLE ALLOWANCES
TO BE MADE FOR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN ALTERATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH TOWN ZONING, SUBDIVISION, AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND AS COORDINATED WITH MADISON HOUSE ASSOCIATES. PROP.
R/W FOLLOWING VACATION OF FAIRFAX STREET. R=12'R=10' R=15' R=15' R=12' R=10' R=25' R=24' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=44' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=44' R=10' R=10'
R=10' R=10' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=15' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=10' \A1;10.0' \A1;15.0' \A1;16.2' \A1;23.0' \A1;25.0' \A1;10.0' 6' SCREEN WALL 6' SCREEN
WALL \pxqc;APPROX. POSSIBLE LOCATION OF MAILBOX (TYP). EXACT LOCATIONS MAY VARY AT TIME OF SITE PLAN. \A1;15.1' \pxqc;6' REINFORCED PEDESTRIAN AREA BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) BUILD TO LINE
(TYP.) BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) \A1;32.0' \A1;31.0' \A1;31.1' \A1;33.6' \A1;33.7' \A1;31.0' 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE TRASH ROOM/AREAS TO BE PROVIDED INTERNAL TO THE BUILDING AND WILL NOT BE
VISIBLE FROM EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING CG-12 RAMPS SHALL NOT HAVE WINGS AT TIME OF FINAL DESIGN CG-12 RAMPS SHALL NOT HAVE WINGS AT TIME OF FINAL DESIGN CG-12 RAMPS SHALL NOT HAVE WINGS
AT TIME OF FINAL DESIGN APPROX. LOCATION OF ACCESSIBLE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION TO MADISON HOUSE 227 Item a. 07/03/19 ΡΒ≅Κ∆9 ΡΓ∆∆Σ ΕΗΚ∆ Μν− Οκµµδθρ ∆µφηµδδθρ Κµχρβοδ ≅θβγησδβσρ Κµχ
Ρτθυδξνθρ Τθαµ+ Κσχ− ϖϖϖ−τθαµ,κσχ−βνλ Σδκ− 6/2−531−7/7/ ≅µµµχκδ+ Υηθφηµη 11//2 6601 Κησσκδ Θηυδθ Στθµοηϕδ TM ΟΚ≅Μ Χ≅Σ∆ No.DATEDESCRIPTION Θ∆ΥΗΡΗΝΜΡ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΥΗΚΚ≅Φ∆ ΣΝςΜ ΝΕ Κ∆∆ΡΑΤΘΦ
ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΨΟ,130/ ΨΝΜΗΜΦ Λ≅Ο ≅Λ∆ΜΧΛ∆ΜΣ Ε ∆ Μ Η Φ Μν−/11/37 Χ≅ΥΗΧ Σ− Λβ∆ΚΓ≅Μ∆Ξ Γ Ν ς Μ Ν Λ Λ Κ ≅ Σ ∆ Β Ο Θ Ν Μ Η Υ Ε Ν Η Θ Φ Η Θ ≅ ∆ ∆ ≅ Ρ Ν Μ Η Ρ ∆ Μ Κ 10/27/2021 07/03/19FIRST SUBMISSION
1 02/27/20 02/27/20SECOND SUBMISSION 2 09/25/20 09/25/20THIRD SUBMISSION 3 03/12/21 03/12/21FOURTH SUBMISSION 4 06/29/21 06/29/21FIFTH SUBMISSION 5 10/27/21FINAL PLANNING COMMISSION
SET 6 10/27/21 ΒΝΜΒ∆ΟΣ ΟΚ≅Μ Β4,/1 0&<2/& 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE030 30 60 30 12015 N VA. STATE GRID NORTH {\Fcomplex|c0;MATCH LINE SEE SHEET C5-01} {\Fcomplex|c0;MATCH
LINE SEE SHEET C5-03} 300 EX. FENCE EX. SANITARY SEWER EX. STORM DRAIN EX. WATER LINE EX. FIRE HYDRANT PROPERTY LINE EX. CONTOUR EX. CURB & GUTTER EX. TREE LINE W X X %%ULEGEND PROP.
CURB & GUTTER LOC PROP. CLEARING & GRADING LIMITS PROP. LIGHT SCREEN WALL STEEP SLOPES SEE SHEET L6-01 FOR CROSSWALK DETAILS APPROX. LOC. POSSIBLE MAILBOX FAIRFAX STREET SE N 23°12'07"
E 99.83' N 23°12'16" E 60.00' N 66°47'44" W 128.01' CATOCTIN CIRCLE SE N 66°47'44" W 233.20' N 23°12'16" E 100.00' N 66°47'44" W 100.00' S 23°12'16" W 100.00' N 23°12'16" E 350.00'
S 89°56'00" W 29.74' N 23°25'29" E 11.77' N 66°47'44" W 14.80' S 66°47'44" E 2.80' (EX. 70' R.O.W.) 0.9' 0.4' 97.6' S KING STREET c.o. SAN LAT SAN LAT S 66°47'37" E 11.73' FAIRFAX STREET
SE PIN # 231-17-7102 CHAE S. RILEY INSTR. # 200308060101379 PIN # 231-17-6450 WILLIAM DEAN MILLER FAMILY LLC INST. # 200808250051570 PIN # 231-17-5821 C. R. KING STREET LLC D.B. 1890
PG. 89 0+00.00 1+00.00 2+00.00 3+00.00 4+00.00 5+00.00 6+00.00 7+00.00 8+00.00 (URBAN BOULEVARD) LOC LOC LOC LOC FAIRFAX ST SE \A1;26.0' \A1;24.0' \A1;24.0' BUILDING F EX. ENTRANCE
TO REMAIN (TO REMAIN) TO REMAIN LOADING ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE LOADING ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE BUILDING B BUILDING A EYE 1 315' SIGHT DISTANCE (LEFT) OBJ. BUILD TO
LINE (TYP.) BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) ONLY ONLY OBJ. EYE 2 335' SIGHT DISTANCE (RIGHT) 315' SIGHT DISTANCE (LEFT) \A1;24.0'
\A1;15.0' \A1;15.0' 22.0' (TYP.) \A1;40.0' 8.0' TYP. \A1;28.1' \A1;29.9' \A1;30.0' \A1;%%P220' SIGHT DISTANCE ESMT SIGHT DISTANCE ESMT (1 LOADING SPACE AT 15'X30') (2 LOADING SPACES
- 15'X30' AND 12'X30') \pxqr;EX. TRASH ENCLOSURE TO REMAIN THIS PORTION OF FAIRFAX STREET WILL BE VACATED AS FURTHER COORDINATED WITH THE TOWN. NOTE THE VACATION OF FAIRFAX STREET IS
NOT REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL OF THIS APPLICATION. HOWEVER, THE VACATION WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR ANY PORTION OF THIS PLAN. \pxqr;{\Fsimplex|c0;\T0.9;\C256;INTERSECTION
SHALL BE A RAISED INTERSECTION AND BE SIGNALIZED AS WARRANTED AND COORDINATED WITH VODT AND THE TOWN OF LEESBURG.} * (GENERAL STREET) EX. PUBLIC STREET (TO BE VACATED) \pxql;PROP.
PRIVATE STREET 1,600 200 2,300 \pxqr;BIKE RACK (TYP.) \pxqr;BIKE RACK (TYP.) \pxqr;BIKE RACK (TYP.) \A1;%%P260' \A1;%%P115' {HIGH STREET PARK} (SEE L SERIES SHEETS FOR HIGH STREET (PRIVATE
GENERAL STREET) MADISON COURT PRIVATE ROAD 'A' ONE WAY MADISON COURT ONE WAY (PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL) (RESIDENTIAL) (RESIDENTIAL) (PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL) LOC BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) BUILD TO
LINE (TYP.) \pxqc;6' REINFORCED PEDESTRIAN AREA {COMMON GREEN} (SEE L SERIES SHEETS FOR DETAILS) 46 47 48 49 50 \A1;%%P31.0' \A1;24.0' \pxqc;MOUNTABLE CURB GAR= 328.60 FF=329.80 GAR=
328.20 FF=328.60 GAR= 323.50 FF=323.80 TW=329.00 BW=326.50 TW=329.60 BW=328.50 STEPS REQUIRED RET. WALL WITH 6' SCREEN WALL ABOVE PROP. R/W FOLLOWING VACATION OF FAIRFAX STREET. R=10'
R=10' R=10' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=15' R=15' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=45'R=45' R=40' R=40' EYE 2 EYE 1 \pxqr;NOTE: EX. DRY UTILITIES TO BE RELOCATED
FROM THIS AREA TO CREATE CORRIDOR FOR SANITARY SEWER \A1;23.0' \A1;25.0' \A1;10.0' 6' SCREEN WALL 6' SCREEN WALL \A1;15.1' \pxqc;6' REINFORCED PEDESTRIAN AREA \A1;31.0' 4 FT. PROJECTION
ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE TRASH ROOM/AREAS TO BE PROVIDED INTERNAL TO THE BUILDING AND WILL NOT BE VISIBLE FROM EXTERIOR
OF THE BUILDING TRASH ROOM/AREAS TO BE PROVIDED INTERNAL TO THE BUILDING AND WILL NOT BE VISIBLE FROM EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING TRASH ROOM/AREAS TO BE PROVIDED INTERNAL TO THE BUILDING
AND WILL NOT BE VISIBLE FROM EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING TRASH ROOM/AREAS TO BE PROVIDED INTERNAL TO THE BUILDING AND WILL NOT BE VISIBLE FROM EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING TRASH ROOM/AREAS
TO BE PROVIDED INTERNAL TO THE BUILDING AND WILL NOT BE VISIBLE FROM EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING 228 Item a. 07/03/19 ΡΒ≅Κ∆9 ΡΓ∆∆Σ ΕΗΚ∆ Μν− Οκµµδθρ ∆µφηµδδθρ Κµχρβοδ ≅θβγησδβσρ Κµχ
Ρτθυδξνθρ Τθαµ+ Κσχ− ϖϖϖ−τθαµ,κσχ−βνλ Σδκ− 6/2−531−7/7/ ≅µµµχκδ+ Υηθφηµη 11//2 6601 Κησσκδ Θηυδθ Στθµοηϕδ TM ΟΚ≅Μ Χ≅Σ∆ No.DATEDESCRIPTION Θ∆ΥΗΡΗΝΜΡ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΥΗΚΚ≅Φ∆ ΣΝςΜ ΝΕ Κ∆∆ΡΑΤΘΦ
ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΨΟ,130/ ΨΝΜΗΜΦ Λ≅Ο ≅Λ∆ΜΧΛ∆ΜΣ Ε ∆ Μ Η Φ Μν−/11/37 Χ≅ΥΗΧ Σ− Λβ∆ΚΓ≅Μ∆Ξ Γ Ν ς Μ Ν Λ Λ Κ ≅ Σ ∆ Β Ο Θ Ν Μ Η Υ Ε Ν Η Θ Φ Η Θ ≅ ∆ ∆ ≅ Ρ Ν Μ Η Ρ ∆ Μ Κ 10/27/2021 07/03/19FIRST SUBMISSION
1 02/27/20 02/27/20SECOND SUBMISSION 2 09/25/20 09/25/20THIRD SUBMISSION 3 03/12/21 03/12/21FOURTH SUBMISSION 4 06/29/21 06/29/21FIFTH SUBMISSION 5 10/27/21FINAL PLANNING COMMISSION
SET 6 10/27/21 ΒΝΜΒ∆ΟΣ ΟΚ≅Μ Β4,/2 0&<2/& 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE030 30 60 30 12015 N VA. STATE GRID NORTH {\Fcomplex|c0;MATCH LINE SEE SHEET C5-04} {\Fcomplex|c0;MATCH
LINE SEE SHEET C5-02} 300 EX. FENCE EX. SANITARY SEWER EX. STORM DRAIN EX. WATER LINE EX. FIRE HYDRANT PROPERTY LINE EX. CONTOUR EX. CURB & GUTTER EX. TREE LINE W X X %%ULEGEND PROP.
CURB & GUTTER LOC PROP. CLEARING & GRADING LIMITS PROP. LIGHT SCREEN WALL STEEP SLOPES SEE SHEET L6-01 FOR CROSSWALK DETAILS APPROX. LOC. POSSIBLE MAILBOX CATOCTIN CIRCLE C1 S 47°54'41"
W 42.48' S 72°49'09" W 52.79' C5 C6 C3 (EX. 70' R.O.W.) FEMA REGULATORY FLOODWAY REGULATORY FLOODWAY (SEE NOTE 5) S 08°13'41" E 616.79' NO PARKING NO PARKING S 78°42'25" E 4.92' N
10°52'32" E 7.66' FEMA REGULATORY FLOODWAY & FEMA REGULATORY FLOODWAY & FEMA ZONE "X" (SEE NOTE 5) FEMA ZONE "X" (SEE NOTE 5) \pxqc;FLOODPLAN OVERLAY DISTRICT \pxqc;FLOODPLAN OVERLAY
DISTRICT \pxqc;FLOODPLAN OVERLAY DISTRICT \pxqc;50' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;50' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;150' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;150' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER 7+00.00 8+00.00 9+00.00
10+00.00 11+00.00 12+00.00 13+00.00 14+00.00 15+00.00 15+31.37 (URBAN BOULEVARD) \pxqc;150' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER LOC LOC LOC LOC FAIRFAX ST SE \A1;26.0' \A1;26.0' BUILDING F GARAGE ENTRANCE
LOADING ENTRANCE LOADING ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE BUILDING E BUILDING D BUILDING C BUILDING B EYE 3 EYE 5 OBJ. 315' SIGHT DISTANCE (LEFT) OBJ. 315' SIGHT
DISTANCE (LEFT) OBJ. BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) TW=315.80 BW=311.20 TW=322.20 BW=322.20 LOADING ENTRANCE TW=319.40 BW=303.50
TW=319.40 BW=304.00 TW=319.40 BW=304.00 {\W0.75;STAIRS} ONLY ONLY OBJ.315' SIGHT DISTANCE (LEFT) OBJ. 335' SIGHT DISTANCE (RIGHT) OBJ. 315' SIGHT DISTANCE (LEFT) ONLY ONLY \A1;15.0'
\A1;15.0' \A1;15.0' 8.0' TYP. \A1;24.0' 24.0' TYP. \A1;15.0' \A1;28.1' \A1;29.9' \A1;18.1'\A1;30.0' SIGHT DISTANCE ESMT SIGHT DISTANCE ESMT SIGHT DISTANCE ESMT SIGHT DISTANCE ESMT SIGHT
DISTANCE ESMT (1 LOADING SPACE AT 15'X30') (1 LOADING SPACE AT 15'X30') (2 LOADING SPACES - 15'X30' AND 12'X30') (GENERAL STREET) 400 1,200 600 \pxqr;BIKE RACK (TYP.) \pxqr;BIKE RACK
(TYP.) \A1;%%P260' \A1;%%P300' \A1;%%P175'\pxqr;LANDSCAPE WALL (NON-RESIDENTIAL) BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) \pxqr;EX. GUARDRAIL TO BE REMOVED AS NECESSARY TO CONNECT TO EX. SIDEWALK {OURS
OVERLOOK} (SEE L SERIES SHEETS FOR LOC \pxql;BUS STOP. LOCATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE AT FINAL ENGINEERING AS COORDINATED WITH THE TOWN R=15' R=14' R=15' R=7.5' R=113' R=87' R=10' R=6'
R=6' R=10' R=40' R=20' R=40' R=40' R=40' R=40' * EYE 5 EYE 3 EYE 4\A1;15.1' 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION
ZONE \A1;50.0' \A1;150.0' BUILDING D ZONE OF ENCROACHMENT INTO 50' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER TRASH ROOM/AREAS TO BE PROVIDED INTERNAL TO THE BUILDING AND WILL NOT BE VISIBLE FROM EXTERIOR
OF THE BUILDING TRASH ROOM/AREAS TO BE PROVIDED INTERNAL TO THE BUILDING AND WILL NOT BE VISIBLE FROM EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING TRASH ROOM/AREAS TO BE PROVIDED INTERNAL TO THE BUILDING
AND WILL NOT BE VISIBLE FROM EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING TRASH ROOM/AREAS TO BE PROVIDED INTERNAL TO THE BUILDING AND WILL NOT BE VISIBLE FROM EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING \A1;50.0' 229 Item
a. 07/03/19 ΡΒ≅Κ∆9 ΡΓ∆∆Σ ΕΗΚ∆ Μν− Οκµµδθρ ∆µφηµδδθρ Κµχρβοδ ≅θβγησδβσρ Κµχ Ρτθυδξνθρ Τθαµ+ Κσχ− ϖϖϖ−τθαµ,κσχ−βνλ Σδκ− 6/2−531−7/7/ ≅µµµχκδ+ Υηθφηµη 11//2 6601 Κησσκδ Θηυδθ
Στθµοηϕδ TM ΟΚ≅Μ Χ≅Σ∆ No.DATEDESCRIPTION Θ∆ΥΗΡΗΝΜΡ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΥΗΚΚ≅Φ∆ ΣΝςΜ ΝΕ Κ∆∆ΡΑΤΘΦ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΨΟ,130/ ΨΝΜΗΜΦ Λ≅Ο ≅Λ∆ΜΧΛ∆ΜΣ Ε ∆ Μ Η Φ Μν−/11/37 Χ≅ΥΗΧ Σ− Λβ∆ΚΓ≅Μ∆Ξ Γ Ν ς Μ Ν Λ Λ Κ ≅ Σ
∆ Β Ο Θ Ν Μ Η Υ Ε Ν Η Θ Φ Η Θ ≅ ∆ ∆ ≅ Ρ Ν Μ Η Ρ ∆ Μ Κ 10/27/2021 07/03/19FIRST SUBMISSION 1 02/27/20 02/27/20SECOND SUBMISSION 2 09/25/20 09/25/20THIRD SUBMISSION 3 03/12/21 03/12/21FOURTH
SUBMISSION 4 06/29/21 06/29/21FIFTH SUBMISSION 5 10/27/21FINAL PLANNING COMMISSION SET 6 10/27/21 ΒΝΜΒ∆ΟΣ ΟΚ≅Μ Β4,/3 0&<2/& {\Fcomplex|c0;MATCH LINE SEE SHEET C5-03} {\Fcomplex|c0;MATCH
LINE SEE SHEET C5-01} 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE030 30 60 30 12015 N VA. STATE GRID NORTH 300 EX. FENCE EX. SANITARY SEWER EX. STORM DRAIN EX. WATER LINE EX. FIRE HYDRANT
PROPERTY LINE EX. CONTOUR EX. CURB & GUTTER EX. TREE LINE W X X %%ULEGEND PROP. CURB & GUTTER LOC PROP. CLEARING & GRADING LIMITS PROP. LIGHT SCREEN WALL STEEP SLOPES SEE SHEET L6-01
FOR CROSSWALK DETAILS APPROX. LOC. POSSIBLE MAILBOX {NOTE: THE RAISED PLATFORM IS CONCEPTUALLY PLANNED TO HAVE A SINGLE CENTRAL COLUMN TO LIMIT ITS IMPACT TO THE FLOODPLAIN. THE PLATFORM
WILL BE RAISED APPROXIMATELY SIX FEET ABOVE EXISTING GRADE SO THAT THE BOTTOM OF THE BRIDGE AND PLATFORM ARE ABOVE THE 100 YEAR WSEL OF THE FLOODPLAIN. TWO RAMPS WITH SLOPES LESS THAN
1:12 WILL EXTEND ALONG HARRISON STREET FROM THE PLATFORM. THE RAMPS WILL BE SUPPORTED AT ONE END BY THE PLATFORM, WITH ADDITIONAL PIERS AS NECESSARY FOR STRUCTURAL SUPPORT. ALL PIERS
AND RAMPS WILL BE CONSIDERED IN THE FLOODPLAIN ANALYSIS, WHICH WILL BE PREPARED SEPARATELY. THE PLATFORM AND RAMPS WILL HAVE RAILINGS AND ORNAMENTATION SIMILAR TO THE MAIN SPAN OF
THE BRIDGE ACROSS TOWN BRANCH. THE EXACT DESIGN, MATERIALS, AND DETAILS OF THE BRIDGE, PLATFORM, AND RAMPS WILL BE DETERMINED AT TIME OF FINAL DESIGN.} HARRISON STREET SE N 59°34'51"
E 323.58' S 08°13'41" E 616.79' (EX. 70' R.O.W.) REGULATORY FLOODWAY (SEE NOTE 5) NO PARKING NO PARKING FEMA REGULATO RY FLOODWAY FEMA ZONE "X" (SEE NOTE 5) S 66°00'35" E 415.54' S
66°00'35" E 415.54' LINE PER D.B. 708 PG.37 LINE PER D.B. 349 PG. 229 \pxqc;FLOODPLAN OVERLAY DISTRICT \pxqc;FLOODPLAN OVERLAY DISTRICT \pxqc;FLOODPLAN OVERLAY DISTRICT \pxqc;50' CREEK
VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;50' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;50' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;150' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;150' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER PIN # 231-18-6244 MADISON HOUSE ASSOCIATES II
LP INSTR. # PIN # 231-18-7370 {TOWN OF LEESBURG D.B. 874 PG 210} \pxqc;150' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;150' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;150' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER LOC LOC LOC LOADING ENTRANCE
BUILDING C BUILDING B BRIDGE BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) TW=315.80 BW=311.20 TW=315.80 BW=311.00 TW=317.70 BW=304.50 TW=322.20 BW=322.20 TW=317.70 BW=305.00TW=321.20 BW=320.70 LOADING ENTRANCE
TW=319.40 BW=303.50 TW=319.40 BW=304.00 TW=319.40 BW=304.00 {\W0.75;STAIRS} \A1;9.9' \A1;19.8' \A1;18.1' (1 LOADING SPACE AT 15'X30') (1 LOADING SPACE AT 15'X30') \pxqr;POSSIBLE APPROX.
ALTERNATE LIMITS OF CLEARING AND GRADING FOR EXCAVATION IN THE FLOODPLAIN TO MITIGATE RISE IN THE FLOODPLAIN WATER SURFACE ELEVATION IF NECESSARY. \pxqr;BIKE RACK (TYP.) (NON-RESIDENTIAL)
{OURS OVERLOOK} (SEE L SERIES SHEETS FOR DETAILS) \A1;28.5' \pxqr;EXISTING 42" RCP TO BE REMOVED. RAMP LOC PIER \px RAMP PIER RAISED PLATFORM ABUTMENT LOC LOC LOCTHE APPLICANT UNDERSTANDS
THAT ANY CHANGES TO THE FLOODPLAIN OR CHANNEL, NOT SHOWN ON THIS REZONING AND SPECIAL EXCEPTION APPLICATION, AS WELL AS ANYTHING THAT MAY CAUSE A RISE IN THE FLOODPLAIN ON THIS OR ANY
ADJACENT PROPERTIES WILL REQUIRE A NEW SPECIAL EXCEPTION PLAN, WHICH WILL INCLUDE ADDITIONAL MEETINGS WITH THE TOWN COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION HEARINGS. \A1;15.1' PROP. SCREEN
WALL 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE \A1;50.0' TRASH ROOM/AREAS TO BE PROVIDED INTERNAL TO THE BUILDING AND WILL NOT BE VISIBLE FROM EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING \A1;50.0' 230 Item a. 07/03/19 ΡΒ≅Κ∆9
ΡΓ∆∆Σ ΕΗΚ∆ Μν− Οκµµδθρ ∆µφηµδδθρ Κµχρβοδ ≅θβγησδβσρ Κµχ Ρτθυδξνθρ Τθαµ+ Κσχ− ϖϖϖ−τθαµ,κσχ−βνλ Σδκ− 6/2−531−7/7/ ≅µµµχκδ+ Υηθφηµη 11//2 6601 Κησσκδ Θηυδθ Στθµοηϕδ TM ΟΚ≅Μ
Χ≅Σ∆ No.DATEDESCRIPTION Θ∆ΥΗΡΗΝΜΡ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΥΗΚΚ≅Φ∆ ΣΝςΜ ΝΕ Κ∆∆ΡΑΤΘΦ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΨΟ,130/ ΨΝΜΗΜΦ Λ≅Ο ≅Λ∆ΜΧΛ∆ΜΣ Ε ∆ Μ Η Φ Μν−/11/37 Χ≅ΥΗΧ Σ− Λβ∆ΚΓ≅Μ∆Ξ Γ Ν ς Μ Ν Λ Λ Κ ≅ Σ ∆ Β Ο Θ Ν Μ Η Υ
Ε Ν Η Θ Φ Η Θ ≅ ∆ ∆ ≅ Ρ Ν Μ Η Ρ ∆ Μ Κ 10/27/2021 07/03/19FIRST SUBMISSION 1 02/27/20 02/27/20SECOND SUBMISSION 2 09/25/20 09/25/20THIRD SUBMISSION 3 03/12/21 03/12/21FOURTH SUBMISSION
4 06/29/21 06/29/21FIFTH SUBMISSION 5 10/27/21FINAL PLANNING COMMISSION SET 6 10/27/21 ΒΝΜΒ∆ΟΣ ΤΣΗΚΗΣΞ ΟΚ≅Μ Β5,/0 0&<2/& {\Fcomplex|c0;MATCH LINE SEE SHEET C6-02} {\Fcomplex|c0;MATCH
LINE SEE SHEET C6-04} 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE030 30 60 30 12015 N VA. STATE GRID NORTH 300 EX. FENCE EX. SANITARY SEWER EX. STORM DRAIN EX. WATER LINE EX. FIRE HYDRANT
PROPERTY LINE EX. CONTOUR EX. CURB & GUTTER EX. TREE LINE W X X %%ULEGEND PROP. CURB & GUTTER LOC PROP. CLEARING & GRADING LIMITS PROP. LIGHT SCREEN WALL STEEP SLOPES {NOTE: }FOLLOWING
THE COMPLETION OF PHASE 1 CONSTRUCTION, THE STORM SEWER FLOW WILL BE REROUTED SOUTH OF BUILDING B ON FAIRFAX STREET AS SHOWN ON THIS SHEET. SEE SHEET C13-01 FOR THE INTERMEDIATE STORM
SEWER DESIGN THAT WILL BE PRESENT DURING PHASE 1 CONSTRUCTION. APPROX. LOC. POSSIBLE MAILBOX NOTE: ALL GRADING AND DRAINAGE ITEMS DEPICTED ON THIS PLAN ARE CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND
SHALL BE REQUIRED TO MEET ALL DCSM AND STATE DESIGN CRITERIA AT THE TIME OF FINAL SITE PLAN. ANY CHANGES TO THE GRADING AND DRAINAGE LAYOUT SHOWN ON THIS PLAN WILL NOT HAVE ANY IMPACT
TO THE OVERALL SITE LAYOUT. CL VEPCO ESMT D.B. 365 PG 520 APPROX. CL VEPCO ESMT D.B. 367 PG 501 \pxqc;APPROX CL VEPCO ESMT D.B. 365 PG. 520 FAIRFAX STREET SE N 23°12'07" E 99.83' N
24°00'40" E 100.98' S 65°44'50" E 62.01' N 18°51'56" E 317.27' S 71°06'22" E 350.00' S 18°54'15" W 349.58' N 23°12'16" E 60.00' N 66°47'44" W 128.01' 10' C & P TEL. CO RIGHT - OF -
WAY D.B. 594 PG. 680 \pxqc;10' SAN. SEWER ESMT D.B. 403 PG. 227 APPROX. CL VEPCO ESMT D.B. 365 PG 520 15' UTILITY ESMT D.B. 403 PG. 227 \pxqc;10' SAN. SEWER ESMT D.B. 403 PG. 227
APPROX LOCATION 10' STORM DRAIN ESMT D.B. 403 PG. APPROX LOCATION 10' STORM DRAIN ESMT D.B. 403 PG. 227 15' UTILITY ESMT D.B. 403 PG. 227 \pxqc;10' SAN. SEWER ESMT D.B. 403 PG. 227
CL VEPCO ESMT D.B. 372 PG 512 APROX CL VEPCO ESMT D.B. 365 PG. 520 WATERLINE ESMT D.B. 1577 PG. 2110 15' UTILITY ESMT D.B. 356 PG. 498 15' VA. POWER ESMT D.B. 935 PG 1476 5' SAN. SEWER
ESMT D.B. 1007 PG 393 (EX. 50' R.O.W.) MADISON COURT S 66°00'35" E 415.54' \pxqc;10' WALK WAY ESMT D.B. 790 PG. 597 0.4' N 66°00'35" W 415.54' APPARENT OVERLAP LINE PER D.B. 708 PG.37
LINE PER D.B. 349 PG. 229 INGRESS/EGRESS AGREEMENT D.B. 891 PG 1644 10' C & P TEL. CO RIGHT - OF - WAY D.B. 594 PG. 680 E D C B A 5 11 8 9 4 3 2 1 21" rcp 30" rcp 30" rcp 24" rcp 24"
rcp 24" rcp 24" rcp 42" rcp EX. EP EX. EP EX. SHOULDER FAIRFAX STREET SE { 231-18-0288 LEE, GARY O & CAROLYN B BOOK 1383 PAGE1723 MONROE MANOR }SECTION 1 LOT 10 {231-18-2082 FOLEY,
NORMAN C & GLENDA KAY AUSTIN} SECTION 1, LOT 11 PIN # 231-17-6960 N/F:BARRY, DELANEY S & TRIS JOSEPH II INST. # 201612020082097 PIN # 231-17-8292 N/F: KEYS, MATTHEW TIMOTHY & ANYA ELIZABETH
INST. # 201801050000941 PIN # 231-17-7574 N/F: GARVEY, CARRIE K R & PETER J INST. # 200309290127328 PIN # 231-17-7778 N/F: BAKER, WADE H & EMILEY M INST. # 200908110054916 PIN # 231-17-7982
N/F: WHISLER, MICHAEL C INST. # 201702270012219 PIN # 231-17-8087 N/F: LAKE, DEAN T INST. # 200709250069730 PIN # 231-17-8190 N/F: CLEMONS, ANN MOSS & DANEIL R TEES INST. # 200809250058122
PIN # 231-17-7368 N/F: CHAMBLIN, JAMES CHRISTOPHER & CHAMBLIN, LYNDSAY WELSH INST. # 201812170072050 PIN # 231-17-8496 N/F: PAICE, RHONDA WILSON & ROGERS, LEO P JR INST. # 201907120038355
PIN # 231-18-4473 MADISON HOUSE ASSOCIATES II LP INSTR. # 200311140151147 PIN # 231-17-6450 WILLIAM DEAN MILLER FAMILY LLC INST. # 200808250051570 \pxqc;APPROX. LOC. EX. 8" W/M str
11 - top grate = 316.76' inv. out 21" rcp = 309.59' str 8 - top curb inlet = 322.17' inv. in fr 9 - 30" rcp = 309.55' inv. out 30" rcp = 309.38' str 9 - top grate = 322.24' inv. in
fr 10 - 21" rcp = 316.91' str 5 - top = 317.99' inv. in 24" rcp = 310.84' inv. in 30" rcp = 305.47' inv. out 42" rcp = 304.59' str 4 - top = 318.55' inv. in 24" rcp = 313.59' inv.
out 24" rcp = 313.30' 24" rcp 24" rcp \pxqc;APPROX. LOC. EX. 6" W/M 311.83 312.42 312.26 312.59312.64 312.89 312.09 311.88 311.63 311.99 311.72 311.76 311.48311.62 311.50 310.91 310.25310.97
314.59 313.62 312.49 311.87 311.85 311.69 311.52 311.38 311.28 311.37 311.24 313.46 312.34 311.78 311.75 311.57 311.52 311.28 311.25 311.29 311.18 10" PVC INV=312.48 10" PVC INV=312.03
314.47 PROP. W/M PROP. W/M PROP. W/M LOC LOADING ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE BUILDING B FF=322.40 FF=322.40 FF=322.40 (1 LOADING SPACE AT 15'X30') THIS PORTION OF FAIRFAX STREET WILL BE
VACATED AS FURTHER COORDINATED WITH THE TOWN. NOTE THE VACATION OF FAIRFAX STREET IS NOT REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL OF THIS APPLICATION. HOWEVER, THE VACATION WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED PRIOR
TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR ANY PORTION OF THIS PLAN. EX. PUBLIC STREET (TO BE \pxql;PROP. PRIVATE STREET 2,300 \pxqr;BIKE RACK (TYP.) PROP. STM. SEW.PROP. STM. ESMT. PROP. STM. ESMT.
\pxqr;EXISTING 42" RCP TO BE REMOVED. PRIVATE ROAD 'B' PRIVATE ROAD 'C' MADISON COURT PRIVATE ROAD 'A' ONE WAY MADISON COURT ONE WAY MADISON COURT PRIVATE ROAD 'D' (RESIDENTIAL) (RESIDENTIAL)
(PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL) (PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL) (RESIDENTIAL) (RESIDENTIAL) (PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL) (RESIDENTIAL) TW=315.00 BW=313.50 TW=315.00 BW=310.80 TW=314.00 BW=309.20 TW=311.00 BW=308.50
TW=316.50 BW=309.60 TW=320.00 BW=312.10 TW=321.00 BW=315.50 TW=322.20 BW=319.60 TW=323.40 BW=323.00 TW=331.25 331.00 TW=334.00 BW=331.00 TW=332.00 BW=330.00 TW=328.50 BW=328.25 6' SCREEN
WALL 6' SCREEN WALL RET. WALL WITH 6' SCREEN WALL ABOVE LOC LOC LOC LOC LOC LOC \pxqr;PROP. PRIVATE STREET \pxql;EX. PUBLIC STREET RET. WALL WITH 6' SCREEN WALL POSS. CONNECTION TO
CLEMONS PROPERTY 6' SCREEN WALL 6' SCREEN WALL RET. WALL \pxqc;6' REINFORCED PEDESTRIAN AREA {COMMON GREEN} (SEE L SERIES SHEETS FOR DETAILS) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 1 23 24 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 22 PROP. SAN. ESMT. PROP. SAN. ESMT. PROP. SAN. ESMT. PROP. SAN. ESMT. \pxqc;MOUNTABLE
CURB \pxqc;MOUNTABLE CURB GAR= 321.13 FF=231.46 GAR= 319.82 FF=320.40 GAR= 321.86 FF=323.61 GAR= 321.86 FF=323.61 GAR= 321.36 FF=323.11 GAR= 320.40 FF=321.11 GAR= 329.96 FF=331.71 GAR=
327.20 FF=328.36 GAR= 326.29 FF=326.87 GAR= 323.86 FF=324.19 GAR= 329.26 FF=329.80 GAR= 325.50 FF=326.04 GAR= 323.31 FF=324.03 GAR= 326.54 FF=327.12 GAR= 323.90 FF=325.10 GAR= 328.60
FF=329.80 GAR= 324.20 FF=324.50 GAR= 328.20 FF=328.60 GAR= 319.80 FF=320.80 GAR= 323.50 FF=323.80 GAR= 321.13 FF=221.46 GAR= 320.74 FF=221.07 TW=329.00 BW=326.50 TW=326.00 BW=326.00
TW=329.60 BW=328.50 (2R) STEPS REQUIRED TW=315.00 BW=314.50 PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM.
SEW. PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. ESMT. PROP. STM. ESMT. PROP. STM. ESMT. PROP. STM. ESMT. PROP. W/M ESMT PROP. W/M ESMT PROP. W/M ESMT PROP. W/M ESMT PROP. W/M ESMT PROP. STM. ESMT.
\pxqc;STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ESMT. - PRIVATELY MAINTAINED PROP. STM. ESMT. PROP. W/M ESMT PROP. W/M ESMT PROP. STM. ESMT. PROP. W/M ESMT PRIV. SAN. ESMT. \pxqr;BIKE RACK (TYP.) 6' REMOVABLE
WOOD SCREEN RET. WALL WITH 6' SCREEN WALL ABOVE RET. WALL WITH 6' SCREEN WALL ABOVE 6' SCREEN WALL \pxql;FINAL TRAIL CONNECTION LOCATION SHALL BE IN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE WITH THIS
CONCEPT PLAN WITH REASONABLE ALLOWANCES TO BE MADE FOR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN ALTERATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH TOWN ZONING, SUBDIVISION, AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND AS COORDINATED
WITH MADISON HOUSE ASSOCIATES. PROP. SAN. SEW. PROP. SAN. SEW. PROP. SAN. SEW. PROP. SAN. SEW. PROP. SAN. SEW. PROP. SAN. SEW. PROP. SAN. SEW. PROP. SAN. SEW. PROP. SAN. SEW. PROP.
R/W FOLLOWING VACATION OF FAIRFAX STREET. PRIV. SAN. ESMT. PRIV. SAN. LAT. APPROX. LIMITS OF UG SWM FACILITY APPROX. LIMITS OF UG SWM FACILITY R=12'R=10' R=15' R=15' R=12' R=10' R=25'
R=24' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=44' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=44' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=10' 6' SCREEN WALL
6' SCREEN WALL \pxqc;APPROX. POSSIBLE LOCATION OF MAILBOX (TYP). EXACT LOCATIONS MAY VARY AT TIME OF SITE PLAN. SAN C/O (TYP.) \pxqc;6' REINFORCED PEDESTRIAN AREA CG-12 RAMPS SHALL
NOT HAVE WINGS AT TIME OF FINAL DESIGN CG-12 RAMPS SHALL NOT HAVE WINGS AT TIME OF FINAL DESIGN 231 Item a. 07/03/19 ΡΒ≅Κ∆9 ΡΓ∆∆Σ ΕΗΚ∆ Μν− Οκµµδθρ ∆µφηµδδθρ Κµχρβοδ ≅θβγησδβσρ
Κµχ Ρτθυδξνθρ Τθαµ+ Κσχ− ϖϖϖ−τθαµ,κσχ−βνλ Σδκ− 6/2−531−7/7/ ≅µµµχκδ+ Υηθφηµη 11//2 6601 Κησσκδ Θηυδθ Στθµοηϕδ TM ΟΚ≅Μ Χ≅Σ∆ No.DATEDESCRIPTION Θ∆ΥΗΡΗΝΜΡ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΥΗΚΚ≅Φ∆ ΣΝςΜ
ΝΕ Κ∆∆ΡΑΤΘΦ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΨΟ,130/ ΨΝΜΗΜΦ Λ≅Ο ≅Λ∆ΜΧΛ∆ΜΣ Ε ∆ Μ Η Φ Μν−/11/37 Χ≅ΥΗΧ Σ− Λβ∆ΚΓ≅Μ∆Ξ Γ Ν ς Μ Ν Λ Λ Κ ≅ Σ ∆ Β Ο Θ Ν Μ Η Υ Ε Ν Η Θ Φ Η Θ ≅ ∆ ∆ ≅ Ρ Ν Μ Η Ρ ∆ Μ Κ 10/27/2021 07/03/19FIRST
SUBMISSION 1 02/27/20 02/27/20SECOND SUBMISSION 2 09/25/20 09/25/20THIRD SUBMISSION 3 03/12/21 03/12/21FOURTH SUBMISSION 4 06/29/21 06/29/21FIFTH SUBMISSION 5 10/27/21FINAL PLANNING
COMMISSION SET 6 10/27/21 ΒΝΜΒ∆ΟΣ ΤΣΗΚΗΣΞ ΟΚ≅Μ Β5,/1 0&<2/& {\Fcomplex|c0;MATCH LINE SEE SHEET C6-01} {\Fcomplex|c0;MATCH LINE SEE SHEET C6-03} 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC
SCALE030 30 60 30 12015 N VA. STATE GRID NORTH 300 EX. FENCE EX. SANITARY SEWER EX. STORM DRAIN EX. WATER LINE EX. FIRE HYDRANT PROPERTY LINE EX. CONTOUR EX. CURB & GUTTER EX. TREE
LINE W X X %%ULEGEND PROP. CURB & GUTTER LOC PROP. CLEARING & GRADING LIMITS PROP. LIGHT SCREEN WALL STEEP SLOPES {NOTE: }FOLLOWING THE COMPLETION OF PHASE 1 CONSTRUCTION, THE STORM
SEWER FLOW WILL BE REROUTED SOUTH OF BUILDING B ON FAIRFAX STREET AS SHOWN ON THIS SHEET. SEE SHEET C13-01 FOR THE INTERMEDIATE STORM SEWER DESIGN THAT WILL BE PRESENT DURING PHASE
1 CONSTRUCTION. APPROX. LOC. POSSIBLE MAILBOX NOTE: ALL GRADING AND DRAINAGE ITEMS DEPICTED ON THIS PLAN ARE CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND SHALL BE REQUIRED TO MEET ALL DCSM AND STATE DESIGN
CRITERIA AT THE TIME OF FINAL SITE PLAN. ANY CHANGES TO THE GRADING AND DRAINAGE LAYOUT SHOWN ON THIS PLAN WILL NOT HAVE ANY IMPACT TO THE OVERALL SITE LAYOUT. \pxqc;APPROX CL VEPCO
ESMT D.B. 365 PG. 520 FAIRFAX STREET SE N 23°12'07" E 99.83' N 23°12'16" E 60.00' N 66°47'44" W 128.01' APPROX LOCATION 10' STORM DRAIN ESMT D.B. 403 PG. 227 \pxqc;10' SAN. SEWER ESMT
D.B. 403 PG. 227 CL VEPCO ESMT D.B. 372 PG 512 CATOCTIN CIRCLE SE N 66°47'44" W 233.20' N 23°12'16" E 100.00' N 66°47'44" W 100.00' S 23°12'16" W 100.00' N 23°12'16" E 350.00' S 89°56'00"
W 29.74' N 23°25'29" E 11.77' APPROX CL VEPCO ESMT D.B. 365 PG. 520 APPROX LOC. C & P ESMT D.B. 528 PG. 477 15' UTILITY ESMT D.B. 403 PG. 227 15' UTILITY ESMT D.B. 403 PG. 227 N 66°47'44"
W 14.80' 10' C & P ESMT D.B. 504 PG. 254 APPROX. LOCATION VEPCO ESMT D.B. 509 PG 86 APPROX. LOCATION VEPCO ESMT D.B. 811 PG 1179 INGRESS & EGRESS ESMT D.B. 1007 PG 393 INGRESS &
EGRESS ESMT D.B. 810 PG 429 5' SAN. SEWER ESMT D.B. 1007 PG 393 10' WATERLINE ESMT D.B. 1007 PG 393 S 66°47'44" E 2.80' (EX. 70' R.O.W.) 0.9' 0.4' 97.6' \pxqc;APPROX CL VEPCO ESMT D.B.
365 PG. 520 S KING STREET E B A 11 8 9 10 21 22 21" rcp 30" rcp 30" rcp c.o. SAN LAT SAN LAT APPROX. LOCATION VEPCO ESMT D.B. 509 PG 86 APPROX CL VEPCO ESMT D.B. 365 PG. 520 S 66°47'37"
E 11.73' FAIRFAX STREET SE PIN # 231-17-7102 CHAE S. RILEY INSTR. # 200308060101379 PIN # 231-17-6450 WILLIAM DEAN MILLER FAMILY LLC INST. # 200808250051570 PIN # 231-17-5821 C. R.
KING STREET LLC D.B. 1890 PG. 89 0+00.00 1+00.00 2+00.00 3+00.00 4+00.00 5+00.00 6+00.00 7+00.00 8+00.00 (URBAN BOULEVARD) str 11 - top grate = 316.76' inv. out 21" rcp = 309.59' str
8 - top curb inlet = 322.17' inv. in fr 9 - 30" rcp = 309.55' inv. out 30" rcp = 309.38' str 9 - top grate = 322.24' inv. in fr 10 - 21" rcp = 316.91' str 10 - top grate = 322.36'
inv. out 21" rcp = 317.51' str 22- curb inlet top = 326.79' inv. in 15" rcp = str 21curb inlet top = 326.27' inv. out 15" rcp = 322.40' 24" rcp 24" rcp 24" rcp 24" rcp PROP. SAN.
SEW. PROP. W/M PROP. W/M PROP. W/M PROP. SAN. ESMT. LOC LOC LOC LOC FAIRFAX ST SE BUILDING F EX. ENTRANCE TO REMAIN (TO REMAIN) TO REMAIN LOADING ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE
LOADING ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE BUILDING B BUILDING A FF=322.40 FF=322.40 FF=322.40 FF=322.60FF=330.20 FF=327.50 FF=327.50 FF=327.50 FF=326.50 FF=325.60 FF=325.00 FF=324.40 FF=324.20
FF=325.30 FF=325.30 FF=325.80 FF=326.30 FF=327.00 FF=327.80 13,400 SF EXISTING WATER SERVICE TO RITE AID FROM EX. W/M IN CATOCTIN CIRCLE TO BE MAINTAINED. EXISTING WATER SERVICE TO
RILEY PROPERTY FROM EX. W/M IN CATOCTIN CIRCLE TO BE MAINTAINED. ONLY ONLY (1 LOADING SPACE AT 15'X30') (2 LOADING SPACES - 15'X30' AND 12'X30') \pxqr;EX. TRASH ENCLOSURE TO REMAIN
THIS PORTION OF FAIRFAX STREET WILL BE VACATED AS FURTHER COORDINATED WITH THE TOWN. NOTE THE VACATION OF FAIRFAX STREET IS NOT REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL OF THIS APPLICATION. HOWEVER, THE
VACATION WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR ANY PORTION OF THIS PLAN. \pxqr;{\Fsimplex|c0;\T0.9;\C256;INTERSECTION SHALL BE A RAISED INTERSECTION AND BE SIGNALIZED
AS WARRANTED AND COORDINATED WITH VODT AND THE TOWN OF LEESBURG.} * (GENERAL STREET) EX. PUBLIC STREET (TO BE VACATED) \pxql;PROP. PRIVATE STREET 1,600 200 2,300 \pxqr;BIKE RACK (TYP.)
\pxqr;BIKE RACK (TYP.) \pxqr;BIKE RACK (TYP.) {HIGH STREET PARK} (SEE L SERIES SHEETS FOR HIGH STREET (PRIVATE GENERAL STREET) PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. SEW. PROP.
STM. ESMT. PROP. STM. SEW.PROP. STM. ESMT. PROP. STM. ESMT. MADISON COURT PRIVATE ROAD 'A' ONE WAY MADISON COURT ONE WAY (PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL) (RESIDENTIAL) (RESIDENTIAL) (PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL)
LOC \pxqc;6' REINFORCED PEDESTRIAN AREA {COMMON GREEN} (SEE L SERIES SHEETS FOR DETAILS) 46 47 48 49 50 PROP. SAN. ESMT. PROP. SAN. ESMT. \pxqc;MOUNTABLE CURB GAR= 328.60 FF=329.80
GAR= 328.20 FF=328.60 GAR= 323.50 FF=323.80 TW=329.00 BW=326.50 TW=329.60 BW=328.50 STEPS REQUIRED PROP. W/M ESMT PROP. W/M ESMT \pxqr;EX. W/M TO BE REMOVED OR ABANDONED \pxqc;STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT ESMT. - PRIVATELY MAINTAINED PROP. W/M ESMT PROP. W/M ESMT PROP. STM. ESMT. PROP. W/M ESMT PRIV. SAN. ESMT. RET. WALL WITH 6' SCREEN WALL ABOVE PROP. SAN. SEW. PROP. SAN.
SEW. PROP. SAN. SEW. PROP. SAN. SEW. PROP. R/W FOLLOWING VACATION OF FAIRFAX STREET. PRIV. SAN. ESMT. PRIV. SAN. LAT. PRIV. SAN. LAT. PRIV. SAN. LAT. PROP. SAN. ESMT. PROP. SAN. ESMT.
\pxql;EX. W/M TO BE REMOVED OR ABANDONED APPROX. LIMITS OF UG SWM FACILITY R=10' R=10' R=10' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=15' R=15' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=10'
R=45'R=45' R=40' R=40' EYE 2 EYE 1 \pxqr;NOTE: EX. DRY UTILITIES TO BE RELOCATED FROM THIS AREA TO CREATE CORRIDOR FOR SANITARY SEWER 6' SCREEN WALL 6' SCREEN WALL SAN C/O (TYP.) \pxqc;6'
REINFORCED PEDESTRIAN AREA 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 232 Item a. 07/03/19 ΡΒ≅Κ∆9 ΡΓ∆∆Σ ΕΗΚ∆ Μν− Οκµµδθρ
∆µφηµδδθρ Κµχρβοδ ≅θβγησδβσρ Κµχ Ρτθυδξνθρ Τθαµ+ Κσχ− ϖϖϖ−τθαµ,κσχ−βνλ Σδκ− 6/2−531−7/7/ ≅µµµχκδ+ Υηθφηµη 11//2 6601 Κησσκδ Θηυδθ Στθµοηϕδ TM ΟΚ≅Μ Χ≅Σ∆ No.DATEDESCRIPTION
Θ∆ΥΗΡΗΝΜΡ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΥΗΚΚ≅Φ∆ ΣΝςΜ ΝΕ Κ∆∆ΡΑΤΘΦ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΨΟ,130/ ΨΝΜΗΜΦ Λ≅Ο ≅Λ∆ΜΧΛ∆ΜΣ Ε ∆ Μ Η Φ Μν−/11/37 Χ≅ΥΗΧ Σ− Λβ∆ΚΓ≅Μ∆Ξ Γ Ν ς Μ Ν Λ Λ Κ ≅ Σ ∆ Β Ο Θ Ν Μ Η Υ Ε Ν Η Θ Φ Η Θ ≅ ∆ ∆ ≅ Ρ
Ν Μ Η Ρ ∆ Μ Κ 10/27/2021 07/03/19FIRST SUBMISSION 1 02/27/20 02/27/20SECOND SUBMISSION 2 09/25/20 09/25/20THIRD SUBMISSION 3 03/12/21 03/12/21FOURTH SUBMISSION 4 06/29/21 06/29/21FIFTH
SUBMISSION 5 10/27/21FINAL PLANNING COMMISSION SET 6 10/27/21 ΒΝΜΒ∆ΟΣ ΤΣΗΚΗΣΞ ΟΚ≅Μ Β5,/2 0&<2/& {\Fcomplex|c0;MATCH LINE SEE SHEET C6-04} {\Fcomplex|c0;MATCH LINE SEE SHEET C6-02} 1
inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE030 30 60 30 12015 N VA. STATE GRID NORTH 300 EX. FENCE EX. SANITARY SEWER EX. STORM DRAIN EX. WATER LINE EX. FIRE HYDRANT PROPERTY LINE EX.
CONTOUR EX. CURB & GUTTER EX. TREE LINE W X X %%ULEGEND PROP. CURB & GUTTER LOC PROP. CLEARING & GRADING LIMITS PROP. LIGHT SCREEN WALL STEEP SLOPES {NOTE: }FOLLOWING THE COMPLETION
OF PHASE 1 CONSTRUCTION, THE STORM SEWER FLOW WILL BE REROUTED SOUTH OF BUILDING B ON FAIRFAX STREET AS SHOWN ON THIS SHEET. SEE SHEET C13-01 FOR THE INTERMEDIATE STORM SEWER DESIGN
THAT WILL BE PRESENT DURING PHASE 1 CONSTRUCTION. APPROX. LOC. POSSIBLE MAILBOX NOTE: ALL GRADING AND DRAINAGE ITEMS DEPICTED ON THIS PLAN ARE CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND SHALL BE REQUIRED
TO MEET ALL DCSM AND STATE DESIGN CRITERIA AT THE TIME OF FINAL SITE PLAN. ANY CHANGES TO THE GRADING AND DRAINAGE LAYOUT SHOWN ON THIS PLAN WILL NOT HAVE ANY IMPACT TO THE OVERALL
SITE LAYOUT. INGRESS & EGRESS ESMT D.B. 1007 PG 393 APPROX. LOCATION VEPCO ESMT D.B. 1070 PG 117 STORM SEWER ESMT D.B. 1007 PG 393 CATOCTIN CIRCLE C1 S 47°54'41" W 42.48' S 72°49'09"
W 52.79' C5 C6 C3 10' WATERLINE ESMT D.B. 1007 PG 393 5' SAN. SEWER ESMT D.B. 1007 PG 393 5' SAN. SEWER ESMT D.B. 1007 PG 393 \pxqc;10' SAN. SEWER ESMT D.B. 403 PG 227 10' WATERLINE
ESMT D.B. 1007 PG STORM SEWER ESMT D.B. 1007 PG 393 25' SAN. SEWER ESMT D.B. 1007 PG 393 10' WATERLINE ESMT D.B. 1007 PG 393 \pxqc;APPROX LOCATION VEPCO ESMT D.B. 1821 PG 2372 20'
SAN. SEWER ESMT D.B. 403 PG 227, & D.B. 1007 PG 393 10' WATERLINE EASEMENT D.B. 1007 PG 393 10' BELL ATLANTIC ESMT D.B. 1439 PG. APPROX. LOCATION BELL ATLANTIC ESMT D.B. 1821 PG.
2378 55' STORM DRAINAGE ESMT D.B. 661 PG. 626 APPROX LOCATION BELL ATLANTIC ESMT D.B. 1821 PG. 2378 10' C & P TEL. CO RIGHT OF - WAY 10' BELL ATLANTIC ESMT D.B. 730 PG. 162 D.B.
1439 PG. 366 25' STORM DRAIN ESMT INST #20160212-0007940 16' TRAIL ESMT INST # 20160212-0007940 15' SLOPE MAINTENANCE ESMT D.B. 793 PG. 137 STORM DRAINAGE ESMT D.B. 793 PG. 137 APPROX.
CL VEPCO RIGHT OF WAY D.B. 365 PG. 520 20' STORM SEWER ESMT D.B. 1007 PG 393 10' C & P TEL. CO ESMT D.B. 730 PG. 10' BELL ATLANTIC ESMT D.B. 1439 PG. 366 40' DRAINAGE ESMT D.B.
358 PG. \pxqc;15' SLOPE MAINTENANCE ESMT D.B. 793 PG. 137 (EX. 70' R.O.W.) FEMA REGULATORY FLOODWAY REGULATORY FLOODWAY (SEE NOTE 5) S 08°13'41" E 616.79' NO PARKING NO PARKING S 78°42'25"
E 4.92' N 10°52'32" E 7.66' FEMA REGULATORY FLOODWAY & FEMA REGULATORY FLOODWAY & FEMA ZONE "X" (SEE NOTE 5) FEMA ZONE "X" (SEE NOTE 5) 18 I J K H G F E 17 16 15 13 14 12 19 20 11
27" rcp 21" rcp 21" rcp 18" rcp 15" rcp18" rcp 21" rcp 21" rcp 24 26 28 30 128"x83" cmp 128"x83" cmp 128"x83" cmp 128"x83" cmp 23 25 27 29 31 32 18" rcp 24"x36" elip 24"x36" elip 35
34 33 APPROX CL VEPCO ESMT D.B. 365 PG. 520 \pxqc;FLOODPLAN OVERLAY DISTRICT \pxqc;FLOODPLAN OVERLAY DISTRICT \pxqc;FLOODPLAN OVERLAY DISTRICT \pxqc;50' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;50'
CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;150' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;150' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER 7+00.00 8+00.00 9+00.00 10+00.00 11+00.00 12+00.00 13+00.00 14+00.00 15+00.00 15+31.37 (URBAN BOULEVARD)
STR 23 - inv = 293.71' STR 25 - inv = 293.41' STR 27 - inv = 293.44' STR 29 - inv = 293.71' str 18 - curb inlet top = 318.28' inv. out 18" rcp = 312.16' STR 17 - CURB INLET TOP =
317.70' INV. IN FR 18- 15" RCP = 311.58' INV. OUT 18" RCP = 311.04' str 16 - curb inlet top = 316.52' inv. in fr 17 - 15" rcp = 310.68' inv. in fr 19- 18" rcp = 311.53' inv. out 21"
rcp = 306.59' str 15 - curb inlet top = 309.48' inv. in 21" rcp = 301.95' inv. out 21" rcp = 300.83' str 13 - mh top = 309.27' inv. in fr 15 - 21" rcp = 299.45' inv. in fr 12 - 21"
rcp = 303.93' inv. out 27" rcp = 299.44' str 14 - es 27" inv out = 296.32 str 12 - mh top = 318.24' inv. in 21" rcp = 307.01' inv. out 21" rcp = 306.84' str 11 - top grate = 316.76'
inv. out 21" rcp = 309.59' str 19- curb inlet top = 317.07' inv. in fr 20- 18" rcp = 311.53' inv. out 18" rcp = str 20 - curb inlet top = 317.35' inv. out 18" rcp = 312.80' str 30
inv = 292.41' str 28 - inv = 292.66' str 26 - inv = 292.53' str 24 - inv = 292.55'str 32 - 18" rcp end wall = str 31 - 18" rcp - inv str 38- ew inv. in 15" rcp = 297.86' str 35 - ew
24x36" inv out = 296.63 str 33 - ew 24x36" inv out = 296.42 str 34 - curb inlet - 24x36" inv out = 297.05 STR 17 - CURB INLET TOP = 317.70' INV. IN FR 18- 15" RCP = 311.58' INV. OUT
18" RCP = 311.04' \pxqc;150' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER PROP. SAN. SEW. PROP. SAN. SEW. PROP. SAN. SEW. PROP. SAN. SEW. PROP. W/M PROP. W/M PROP. W/M PROP. W/M ESMT PROP. W/M ESMTPROP. W/M
ESMT PROP. SAN. ESMT. PROP. SAN. ESMT. LOC LOC LOC LOC FAIRFAX ST SE BUILDING F GARAGE ENTRANCE LOADING ENTRANCE LOADING ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE BUILDING
E BUILDING D BUILDING C BUILDING B FF=322.40 FF=322.40 FF=320.00 FF=318.80 FF=321.70FF=322.60FF=327.50 FF=327.50 FF=327.50 FF=326.50 FF=325.60 FF=325.00 FF=324.40 13,400 SF TW=315.80
BW=311.20 TW=322.20 BW=322.20 LOADING ENTRANCE TW=319.40 BW=303.50 TW=319.40 BW=304.00 TW=319.40 BW=304.00 {\W0.75;STAIRS} FF=322.40 ONLY ONLY ONLY ONLY (1 LOADING SPACE AT 15'X30')
(1 LOADING SPACE AT 15'X30') (2 LOADING SPACES - 15'X30' AND 12'X30') (GENERAL STREET) 400 1,200 600 \pxqr;BIKE RACK (TYP.) \pxqr;BIKE RACK (TYP.) \pxqr;LANDSCAPE WALL (NON-RESIDENTIAL)
\pxqr;EX. GUARDRAIL TO BE REMOVED AS NECESSARY TO CONNECT TO EX. SIDEWALK {OURS OVERLOOK} (SEE L SERIES SHEETS FOR \pxql;POSSIBLE WATER QUALITY STRUCTURE PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM.
SEW. PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. ESMT. PROP. STM. ESMT.PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. SEW.
PROP. STM. ESMT. {\W0.8;PROP. OUTFALL DITCH} LOC \pxqc;STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ESMT. - PRIVATELY MAINTAINED \pxql;BUS STOP. LOCATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE AT FINAL ENGINEERING AS COORDINATED
WITH THE TOWN {\W0.8;PROP. STM. SEW.} \pxql;PRIVATE \pxql;PUBLIC \pxql;PUBLIC R=15' R=14' R=15' R=7.5' R=113' R=87' R=10' R=6' R=6' R=10' R=40' R=20' R=40' R=40' R=40' R=40' * EYE 5
EYE 3 EYE 4 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 233 Item a. 07/03/19 ΡΒ≅Κ∆9 ΡΓ∆∆Σ ΕΗΚ∆ Μν− Οκµµδθρ ∆µφηµδδθρ
Κµχρβοδ ≅θβγησδβσρ Κµχ Ρτθυδξνθρ Τθαµ+ Κσχ− ϖϖϖ−τθαµ,κσχ−βνλ Σδκ− 6/2−531−7/7/ ≅µµµχκδ+ Υηθφηµη 11//2 6601 Κησσκδ Θηυδθ Στθµοηϕδ TM ΟΚ≅Μ Χ≅Σ∆ No.DATEDESCRIPTION Θ∆ΥΗΡΗΝΜΡ
ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΥΗΚΚ≅Φ∆ ΣΝςΜ ΝΕ Κ∆∆ΡΑΤΘΦ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΨΟ,130/ ΨΝΜΗΜΦ Λ≅Ο ≅Λ∆ΜΧΛ∆ΜΣ Ε ∆ Μ Η Φ Μν−/11/37 Χ≅ΥΗΧ Σ− Λβ∆ΚΓ≅Μ∆Ξ Γ Ν ς Μ Ν Λ Λ Κ ≅ Σ ∆ Β Ο Θ Ν Μ Η Υ Ε Ν Η Θ Φ Η Θ ≅ ∆ ∆ ≅ Ρ Ν Μ Η Ρ ∆
Μ Κ 10/27/2021 07/03/19FIRST SUBMISSION 1 02/27/20 02/27/20SECOND SUBMISSION 2 09/25/20 09/25/20THIRD SUBMISSION 3 03/12/21 03/12/21FOURTH SUBMISSION 4 06/29/21 06/29/21FIFTH SUBMISSION
5 10/27/21FINAL PLANNING COMMISSION SET 6 10/27/21 ΒΝΜΒ∆ΟΣ ΤΣΗΚΗΣΞ ΟΚ≅Μ Β5,/3 0&<2/& {\Fcomplex|c0;MATCH LINE SEE SHEET C6-03} {\Fcomplex|c0;MATCH LINE SEE SHEET C6-01} 1 inch =
ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE030 30 60 30 12015 N VA. STATE GRID NORTH 300 EX. FENCE EX. SANITARY SEWER EX. STORM DRAIN EX. WATER LINE EX. FIRE HYDRANT PROPERTY LINE EX. CONTOUR EX.
CURB & GUTTER EX. TREE LINE W X X %%ULEGEND PROP. CURB & GUTTER LOC PROP. CLEARING & GRADING LIMITS PROP. LIGHT SCREEN WALL STEEP SLOPES APPROX. LOC. POSSIBLE MAILBOX NOTE: ALL GRADING
AND DRAINAGE ITEMS DEPICTED ON THIS PLAN ARE CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND SHALL BE REQUIRED TO MEET ALL DCSM AND STATE DESIGN CRITERIA AT THE TIME OF FINAL SITE PLAN. ANY CHANGES TO THE
GRADING AND DRAINAGE LAYOUT SHOWN ON THIS PLAN WILL NOT HAVE ANY IMPACT TO THE OVERALL SITE LAYOUT. HARRISON STREET SE APROX CL VEPCO ESMT D.B. 365 PG. 520 WATERLINE ESMT D.B. 1577
PG. 2110 15' UTILITY ESMT D.B. 356 PG. 498 N 59°34'51" E 323.58' S 08°13'41" E 616.79' 10' WATERLINE ESMT D.B. 1007 PG 393 APPROX. LOCATION VEPCO ESMT D.B. 997 PG 948 5' SAN. SEWER
ESMT D.B. 1007 PG 393 5' SAN. SEWER ESMT D.B. 1007 PG 393 \pxqc;10' SAN. SEWER ESMT D.B. 403 PG 227 20' SAN. SEWER ESMT D.B. 403 PG 227, & D.B. 1007 PG 393 10' WATERLINE EASEMENT
D.B. 1007 PG 393 15' SLOPE MAINTENAN CE ESMT D.B. 793 PG. APPROX. CL VEPCO RIGHT OF WAY D.B. 365 PG. 30' UTILITY ESMT D.B. 358 PG. 498 10' C & P TEL. CO RIGHT OF - WAY D.B. 594 PG.
680 10' C & P TEL. CO RIGHT - OF - WAY D.B. 720 PG. 776 APPROX CL VEPCO RIGHT OF WAY D.B. 365 PG. 520 20' STORM SEWER ESMT D.B. 1007 PG 393 10' C & P TEL. CO ESMT D.B. 730 PG. 10'
BELL ATLANTIC ESMT D.B. 1439 PG. 366 40' DRAINAGE ESMT D.B. 358 PG.APPROX. CL VEPCO RIGHT OF WAY D.B. 365 PG. \pxqc;15' SLOPE MAINTENANCE ESMT D.B. 793 PG. 137 \pxqc;16' TRAIL ESMT
INST # 20160212-0007940 (EX. 70' R.O.W.) REGULATORY FLOODWAY (SEE NOTE 5) NO PARKING NO PARKING FEMA REGULATO RY FLOODWAY FEMA ZONE "X" (SEE NOTE 5) 55' STORM DRAINAGE ESMT D.B. 661
PG 626 S 66°00'35" E 415.54' S 66°00'35" E 415.54' APPARENT OVERLAP LINE PER D.B. 708 PG.37 LINE PER D.B. 349 PG. 229 10' C & P TEL. CO RIGHT - OF - WAY D.B. 594 PG. 680 F E 12 7 6
11 38 37 21" rcp 21" rcp 42" rcp 15" rcp str 37 - es inv. out 15" rcp = 296.95' str 41 inv. in 24" rcp = 298.52' str 39inv. in 18" rcp = 298.76' str 42- ew inv. in 24" rcp = 299.39'
str 40- ew inv. in 18" rcp = 299.46' 41 42 39 40 24" rcp 18" rcp 24"x36" elip 24"x36" elip 35 34 \pxqc;FLOODPLAN OVERLAY DISTRICT \pxqc;FLOODPLAN OVERLAY DISTRICT \pxqc;FLOODPLAN OVERLAY
DISTRICT \pxqc;50' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;50' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;50' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;150' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;150' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER PIN # 231-18-6244 MADISON
HOUSE ASSOCIATES II LP INSTR. # PIN # 231-18-7370 {TOWN OF LEESBURG D.B. 874 PG 210} str 12 - mh top = 318.24' inv. in 21" rcp = 307.01' inv. out 21" rcp = 306.84' str 11 - top grate
= 316.76' inv. out 21" rcp = 309.59' str 6 - top = 311.17' inv. in 42" rcp = 303.27' inv. out 42" rcp str 6 - es inv. out 42" rcp = 302.03' str 38- ew inv. in 15" rcp = 297.86' str
41 inv. in 24" rcp = 298.52' str 39inv. in 18" rcp = 298.76' str 42- ew inv. in 24" rcp = 299.39' str 40- ew inv. in 18" rcp = 299.46' str 35 - ew 24x36" inv out = 296.63 str 34 - curb
inlet - 24x36" inv out = 297.05 \pxqc;150' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;150' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;150' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER PROP. W/M PROP. W/M PROP. W/M ESMT PROP. W/M ESMT LOC LOC
LOC LOADING ENTRANCE BUILDING C BUILDING B FF=322.40 FF=322.40 FF=320.00 BRIDGE TW=315.80 BW=311.20 TW=315.80 BW=311.00 TW=317.70 BW=304.50 TW=322.20 BW=322.20 TW=317.70 BW=305.00TW=321.20
BW=320.70 LOADING ENTRANCE TW=319.40 BW=303.50 TW=319.40 BW=304.00 TW=319.40 BW=304.00 {\W0.75;STAIRS} FF=322.40 (1 LOADING SPACE AT 15'X30') (1 LOADING SPACE AT 15'X30') \pxqr;POSSIBLE
APPROX. ALTERNATE LIMITS OF CLEARING AND GRADING FOR EXCAVATION IN THE FLOODPLAIN TO MITIGATE RISE IN THE FLOODPLAIN WATER SURFACE ELEVATION IF NECESSARY. \pxqr;BIKE RACK (TYP.) (NON-RESIDENTIAL)
{OURS OVERLOOK} (SEE L SERIES SHEETS FOR DETAILS) \pxql;POSSIBLE WATER QUALITY STRUCTURE PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. SEW. {\W0.8;PROP. OUTFALL DITCH} \pxqr;EXISTING 42" RCP TO BE REMOVED.
RAMP LOC \pxqc;STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ESMT. - PRIVATELY MAINTAINED PIER \px RAMP PIER RAISED PLATFORM ABUTMENT LOC LOC LOC {\W0.8;PROP. STM. SEW.} \pxql;PRIVATE \pxql;PUBLIC \pxql;PUBLIC
THE APPLICANT UNDERSTANDS THAT ANY CHANGES TO THE FLOODPLAIN OR CHANNEL, NOT SHOWN ON THIS REZONING AND SPECIAL EXCEPTION APPLICATION, AS WELL AS ANYTHING THAT MAY CAUSE A RISE IN THE
FLOODPLAIN ON THIS OR ANY ADJACENT PROPERTIES WILL REQUIRE A NEW SPECIAL EXCEPTION PLAN, WHICH WILL INCLUDE ADDITIONAL MEETINGS WITH THE TOWN COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION HEARINGS.
PROP. SCREEN WALL 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE \pxqr;{\W1;A DCSM MODIFICATION WILL BE SUBMITTED AT TIME OF FINAL SITE PLAN TO ALLOW THE PIPE TO DAYLIGHT THROUGH RETAINING WALL. FINAL WALL
DESIGN WILL INCLUDE MEASURES IDENTIFIED IN THE REQUEST AND APPROVAL OF THE DCSM MODIFICATION. } 234 Item a. 07/03/19 ΡΒ≅Κ∆9 ΡΓ∆∆Σ ΕΗΚ∆ Μν− Οκµµδθρ ∆µφηµδδθρ Κµχρβοδ ≅θβγησδβσρ
Κµχ Ρτθυδξνθρ Τθαµ+ Κσχ− ϖϖϖ−τθαµ,κσχ−βνλ Σδκ− 6/2−531−7/7/ ≅µµµχκδ+ Υηθφηµη 11//2 6601 Κησσκδ Θηυδθ Στθµοηϕδ TM ΟΚ≅Μ Χ≅Σ∆ No.DATEDESCRIPTION Θ∆ΥΗΡΗΝΜΡ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΥΗΚΚ≅Φ∆ ΣΝςΜ
ΝΕ Κ∆∆ΡΑΤΘΦ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΨΟ,130/ ΨΝΜΗΜΦ Λ≅Ο ≅Λ∆ΜΧΛ∆ΜΣ Ε ∆ Μ Η Φ Μν−/11/37 Χ≅ΥΗΧ Σ− Λβ∆ΚΓ≅Μ∆Ξ Γ Ν ς Μ Ν Λ Λ Κ ≅ Σ ∆ Β Ο Θ Ν Μ Η Υ Ε Ν Η Θ Φ Η Θ ≅ ∆ ∆ ≅ Ρ Ν Μ Η Ρ ∆ Μ Κ 10/27/2021 07/03/19FIRST
SUBMISSION 1 02/27/20 02/27/20SECOND SUBMISSION 2 09/25/20 09/25/20THIRD SUBMISSION 3 03/12/21 03/12/21FOURTH SUBMISSION 4 06/29/21 06/29/21FIFTH SUBMISSION 5 10/27/21FINAL PLANNING
COMMISSION SET 6 10/27/21 ΒΝΜΒ∆ΟΣΤ≅Κ ΦΘ≅ΧΗΜΦ ΟΚ≅Μ Β6,/0 0&<2/& {\Fcomplex|c0;MATCH LINE SEE SHEET C7-02} {\Fcomplex|c0;MATCH LINE SEE SHEET C7-04} 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC
SCALE030 30 60 30 12015 N VA. STATE GRID NORTH 300 EX. FENCE EX. SANITARY SEWER EX. STORM DRAIN EX. WATER LINE EX. FIRE HYDRANT PROPERTY LINE EX. CONTOUR EX. CURB & GUTTER EX. TREE
LINE W X X %%ULEGEND PROP. CURB & GUTTER LOC PROP. CLEARING & GRADING LIMITS PROP. LIGHT PROP. WATER FLOW DIRECTION SCREEN WALL STEEP SLOPES APPROX. LOC. POSSIBLE MAILBOX NOTE: ALL
GRADING AND DRAINAGE ITEMS DEPICTED ON THIS PLAN ARE CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND SHALL BE REQUIRED TO MEET ALL DCSM AND STATE DESIGN CRITERIA AT THE TIME OF FINAL SITE PLAN. ANY CHANGES
TO THE GRADING AND DRAINAGE LAYOUT SHOWN ON THIS PLAN WILL NOT HAVE ANY IMPACT TO THE OVERALL SITE LAYOUT. FAIRFAX STREET SE N 23°12'07" E 99.83' N 24°00'40" E 100.98' S 65°44'50" E
62.01' N 18°51'56" E 317.27' S 71°06'22" E 350.00' S 18°54'15" W 349.58' N 23°12'16" E 60.00' N 66°47'44" W 128.01' (EX. 50' R.O.W.) MADISON COURT S 66°00'35" E 415.54' 0.4' N 66°00'35"
W 415.54' APPARENT OVERLAP LINE PER D.B. 708 PG.37 LINE PER D.B. 349 PG. 229 335.7 336.8 336.4 334.8 337.4 335.4 334.6 336.9 337.6 336.1 335.4 336.8 334.6 335.5 337.4 336.3 333.2 332.5
334.4 335.7 332.4 329.5 329.6 329.6 328.5 328.4 327.6 326.5 326.5 324.4 325.8 323.8 325.5 324.6 323.5 324.4 323.5 322.5 323.4 333.6 322.5 322.7 321.3 320.2 322.8 319.4 331.6 330.3 327.5
329.6 322.7 324.7 326.4 325.6 321.7 328.2 320.6 322.6 323.6 318.6 319.4 323.7 323.5 323.6 318.5 322.4 322.8 325.1 321.7 319.3 318.6 321.7 320.4 324.5 321.5 316.6 320.5 319.5 311.8 318.5
310.7 310.7 308.1 309.4 310.5 308.2 316.7 5 11 8 9 4 3 2 1 21" rcp 30" rcp 30" rcp 24" rcp 24" rcp 24" rcp 24" rcp 42" rcp 308 330 334 334 336 332 330 328 326 324 336 334 332 330 328
334 332 330 328 322 318 320 306 310 308 322 336 310 312 314 316 318 320 322 324 326 328 326 320 322 324 EX. EP EX. EP EX. SHOULDER FAIRFAX STREET SE { 231-18-0288 LEE, GARY O & CAROLYN
B BOOK 1383 PAGE1723 MONROE MANOR }SECTION 1 LOT 10 {231-18-2082 FOLEY, NORMAN C & GLENDA KAY AUSTIN} SECTION 1, LOT 11 PIN # 231-17-6960 N/F:BARRY, DELANEY S & TRIS JOSEPH II INST.
# 201612020082097 PIN # 231-17-8292 N/F: KEYS, MATTHEW TIMOTHY & ANYA ELIZABETH INST. # 201801050000941 PIN # 231-17-7574 N/F: GARVEY, CARRIE K R & PETER J INST. # 200309290127328 PIN
# 231-17-7778 N/F: BAKER, WADE H & EMILEY M INST. # 200908110054916 PIN # 231-17-7982 N/F: WHISLER, MICHAEL C INST. # 201702270012219 PIN # 231-17-8087 N/F: LAKE, DEAN T INST. # 200709250069730
PIN # 231-17-8190 N/F: CLEMONS, ANN MOSS & DANEIL R TEES INST. # 200809250058122 PIN # 231-17-7368 N/F: CHAMBLIN, JAMES CHRISTOPHER & CHAMBLIN, LYNDSAY WELSH INST. # 201812170072050
PIN # 231-17-8496 N/F: PAICE, RHONDA WILSON & ROGERS, LEO P JR INST. # 201907120038355 PIN # 231-18-4473 MADISON HOUSE ASSOCIATES II LP INSTR. # 200311140151147 PIN # 231-17-6450 WILLIAM
DEAN MILLER FAMILY LLC INST. # 200808250051570 324 323 323 322 321 str 11 - top grate = 316.76' inv. out 21" rcp = 309.59' str 8 - top curb inlet = 322.17' inv. in fr 9 - 30" rcp =
309.55' inv. out 30" rcp = 309.38' str 9 - top grate = 322.24' inv. in fr 10 - 21" rcp = 316.91' str 5 - top = 317.99' inv. in 24" rcp = 310.84' inv. in 30" rcp = 305.47' inv. out
42" rcp = 304.59' str 4 - top = 318.55' inv. in 24" rcp = 313.59' inv. out 24" rcp = 313.30' 24" rcp 24" rcp 311.83 312.42 312.26 312.59312.64 312.89 312.09 311.88 311.63 311.99 311.72
311.76 311.48311.62 311.50 310.91 310.25310.97 314.59 313.62 312.49 311.87 311.85 311.69 311.52 311.38 311.28 311.37 311.24 313.46 312.34 311.78 311.75 311.57 311.52 311.28 311.25 311.29
311.18 10" PVC INV=312.48 10" PVC INV=312.03 314.47 22 40 22 40 20 22 30 24 00 322 LOC FF=322.40 FF=322.40 FF=322.40 14 60 318 THIS PORTION OF FAIRFAX STREET WILL BE VACATED AS FURTHER
COORDINATED WITH THE TOWN. NOTE THE VACATION OF FAIRFAX STREET IS NOT REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL OF THIS APPLICATION. HOWEVER, THE VACATION WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL
FOR ANY PORTION OF THIS PLAN. EX. PUBLIC STREET (TO BE \pxql;PROP. PRIVATE STREET 2,300 \pxqr;BIKE RACK (TYP.) \pxqr;EXISTING 42" RCP TO BE REMOVED. PRIVATE ROAD 'B' PRIVATE ROAD 'C'
MADISON COURT PRIVATE ROAD 'A' ONE WAY MADISON COURT ONE WAY MADISON COURT PRIVATE ROAD 'D' (RESIDENTIAL) (RESIDENTIAL) (PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL) (PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL) (RESIDENTIAL) (RESIDENTIAL)
(PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL) (RESIDENTIAL) TW=315.00 BW=313.50 TW=315.00 BW=310.80 TW=314.00 BW=309.20 TW=311.00 BW=308.50 TW=316.50 BW=309.60 TW=320.00 BW=312.10 TW=321.00 BW=315.50 TW=322.20
BW=319.60 TW=323.40 BW=323.00 TW=331.25 331.00 TW=334.00 BW=331.00 TW=332.00 BW=330.00 TW=328.50 BW=328.25 6' SCREEN WALL 6' SCREEN WALL RET. WALL WITH 6' SCREEN WALL ABOVE LOC LOC
LOC LOC LOC LOC \pxqr;PROP. PRIVATE STREET \pxql;EX. PUBLIC STREET RET. WALL WITH 6' SCREEN WALL POSS. CONNECTION TO CLEMONS PROPERTY 6' SCREEN WALL 6' SCREEN WALL RET. WALL \pxqc;6'
REINFORCED PEDESTRIAN AREA {COMMON GREEN} (SEE L SERIES SHEETS FOR DETAILS) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42
43 1 23 24 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 22 \pxqc;MOUNTABLE CURB \pxqc;MOUNTABLE CURB 21 66 30 80 30 60 30 73 35 10 28 89 28 29 26 69 25 39 22 50 21 70 22 10 21 70 22 40 22 40 21 70
20 20 5020 70 24 40 23 50 22 90 23 50 324 324 324 322 322 320 320 320 320 320 322 322 322 324 322 322 324 326 328 330 328 326 324 322 324 326 328330 334 332 330 328 326 324 324 322
320 318 318 318 318 318 318 320 322 316 314 312 324 328 23 60 26 90 27 60 25 20 24 30 324 322 322 324 324 318 316 314 318 316 322 326 324 326 TW=329.00 BW=326.50 TW=326.00 BW=326.00
TW=329.60 BW=328.50 22 00 23 30 22 20 21 34 21 10 20 70 22 10 20 00 18 50 19 30 17 90 17 50 17 80 18 60 18 30 19 10 19 20 16 80 18 09 18 66 18 47 20 07 22 5122 97 25 10 24 16 30 10
29 50 26 20 23 10 18 20 18 20 322.10 318.30 17 80 STEPS REQUIRED TW=315.00 BW=314.50 316 316 314 312\pxqr;BIKE RACK (TYP.) 2430 6' REMOVABLE WOOD SCREEN RET. WALL WITH 6' SCREEN WALL
ABOVE RET. WALL WITH 6' SCREEN WALL ABOVE 6' SCREEN WALL \pxql;FINAL TRAIL CONNECTION LOCATION SHALL BE IN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE WITH THIS CONCEPT PLAN WITH REASONABLE ALLOWANCES
TO BE MADE FOR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN ALTERATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH TOWN ZONING, SUBDIVISION, AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND AS COORDINATED WITH MADISON HOUSE ASSOCIATES. PROP.
R/W FOLLOWING VACATION OF FAIRFAX STREET. R=12'R=10' R=15' R=15' R=12' R=10' R=25' R=24' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=44' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=44' R=10' R=10'
R=10' R=10' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=10' 6' SCREEN WALL 6' SCREEN WALL \pxqc;APPROX. POSSIBLE LOCATION OF MAILBOX (TYP). EXACT LOCATIONS MAY VARY AT TIME OF
SITE PLAN. \pxqc;6' REINFORCED PEDESTRIAN AREA \pxqc;NOTE: NO SIGNAGE OR OBSTRUCTIONS SUCH AS BENCHES WILL BE PLACED IN THE 6' PED. REINFORCED AREA. CG-12 RAMPS SHALL NOT HAVE WINGS
AT TIME OF FINAL DESIGN CG-12 RAMPS SHALL NOT HAVE WINGS AT TIME OF FINAL DESIGN 235 Item a. 07/03/19 ΡΒ≅Κ∆9 ΡΓ∆∆Σ ΕΗΚ∆ Μν− Οκµµδθρ ∆µφηµδδθρ Κµχρβοδ ≅θβγησδβσρ Κµχ Ρτθυδξνθρ
Τθαµ+ Κσχ− ϖϖϖ−τθαµ,κσχ−βνλ Σδκ− 6/2−531−7/7/ ≅µµµχκδ+ Υηθφηµη 11//2 6601 Κησσκδ Θηυδθ Στθµοηϕδ TM ΟΚ≅Μ Χ≅Σ∆ No.DATEDESCRIPTION Θ∆ΥΗΡΗΝΜΡ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΥΗΚΚ≅Φ∆ ΣΝςΜ ΝΕ Κ∆∆ΡΑΤΘΦ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅
ΨΟ,130/ ΨΝΜΗΜΦ Λ≅Ο ≅Λ∆ΜΧΛ∆ΜΣ Ε ∆ Μ Η Φ Μν−/11/37 Χ≅ΥΗΧ Σ− Λβ∆ΚΓ≅Μ∆Ξ Γ Ν ς Μ Ν Λ Λ Κ ≅ Σ ∆ Β Ο Θ Ν Μ Η Υ Ε Ν Η Θ Φ Η Θ ≅ ∆ ∆ ≅ Ρ Ν Μ Η Ρ ∆ Μ Κ 10/27/2021 07/03/19FIRST SUBMISSION 1 02/27/20
02/27/20SECOND SUBMISSION 2 09/25/20 09/25/20THIRD SUBMISSION 3 03/12/21 03/12/21FOURTH SUBMISSION 4 06/29/21 06/29/21FIFTH SUBMISSION 5 10/27/21FINAL PLANNING COMMISSION SET 6 10/27/21
ΒΝΜΒ∆ΟΣΤ≅Κ ΦΘ≅ΧΗΜΦ ΟΚ≅Μ Β6,/1 0&<2/& {\Fcomplex|c0;MATCH LINE SEE SHEET C7-01} {\Fcomplex|c0;MATCH LINE SEE SHEET C7-03} 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE030 30 60 30 12015
N VA. STATE GRID NORTH 300 EX. FENCE EX. SANITARY SEWER EX. STORM DRAIN EX. WATER LINE EX. FIRE HYDRANT PROPERTY LINE EX. CONTOUR EX. CURB & GUTTER EX. TREE LINE W X X %%ULEGEND PROP.
CURB & GUTTER LOC PROP. CLEARING & GRADING LIMITS PROP. LIGHT PROP. WATER FLOW DIRECTION SCREEN WALL STEEP SLOPES APPROX. LOC. POSSIBLE MAILBOX NOTE: ALL GRADING AND DRAINAGE ITEMS
DEPICTED ON THIS PLAN ARE CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND SHALL BE REQUIRED TO MEET ALL DCSM AND STATE DESIGN CRITERIA AT THE TIME OF FINAL SITE PLAN. ANY CHANGES TO THE GRADING AND DRAINAGE
LAYOUT SHOWN ON THIS PLAN WILL NOT HAVE ANY IMPACT TO THE OVERALL SITE LAYOUT. FAIRFAX STREET SE N 23°12'07" E 99.83' N 23°12'16" E 60.00' N 66°47'44" W 128.01' CATOCTIN CIRCLE SE N
66°47'44" W 233.20' N 23°12'16" E 100.00' N 66°47'44" W 100.00' S 23°12'16" W 100.00' N 23°12'16" E 350.00' S 89°56'00" W 29.74' N 23°25'29" E 11.77' N 66°47'44" W 14.80' S 66°47'44"
E 2.80' (EX. 70' R.O.W.) 0.9' 0.4' 97.6' S KING STREET 340.6 341.4 339.6 341.7 340.5 339.7 338.6 340.5 337.4 339.6 336.4 337.7 336.7 334.8 338.8 335.6 337.5 336.5 335.6 337.6 335.6
335.5 335.4 336.9 334.7 335.6 335.7 336.6 336.8 335.3 336.4 335.5 334.8 334.6 334.8 335.7 335.4 334.6 335.1 335.7 333.7 333.5 336.1 333.5 335.4 334.6 332.6 334.3 334.2 334.6 335.5 333.2
332.5 331.4 333.5 334.4 330.5 332.4 333.7 333.7 332.5 331.5 329.4 329.6 329.5 332.8 328.4 329.6 329.4 332.6 332.6 328.5 331.8 327.4 327.6 327.3 326.5 326.5 326.6 331.6 326.5 331.4 325.8
325.5 324.7 325.5 330.5 330.7 330.6 328.7 323.5 324.4 329.5 329.6 323.4 326.5 329.7 327.6 324.5 328.4 322.7 328.6 325.5 327.5 324.6 326.5 328.5 323.3 322.8 326.5 327.4 327.7 327.8 324.2
326.7 325.4 322.7 326.5 323.4 321.7 326.4 325.6 320.6 324.6 325.6 319.4 324.5 322.4 324.5 321.7 323.6 324.4 323.6 324.3 322.6 323.5 323.4 321.5 322.4 322.6 320.5 322.3 322.4 319.5 321.8
318.5 316.7 11 8 9 10 21 22 21" rcp 30" rcp 30" rcp c.o. SAN LAT SAN LAT 334 332 330 328 328 330 322 336 324 326 328 330 332 330 328 340 338 336 334 332 326 324 322 S 66°47'37" E 11.73'
FAIRFAX STREET SE PIN # 231-17-7102 CHAE S. RILEY INSTR. # 200308060101379 PIN # 231-17-6450 WILLIAM DEAN MILLER FAMILY LLC INST. # 200808250051570 PIN # 231-17-5821 C. R. KING STREET
LLC D.B. 1890 PG. 89 324 323 323 322 321 0+00.00 1+00.00 2+00.00 3+00.00 4+00.00 5+00.00 6+00.00 7+00.00 8+00.00 (URBAN BOULEVARD) str 11 - top grate = 316.76' inv. out 21" rcp = 309.59'
str 8 - top curb inlet = 322.17' inv. in fr 9 - 30" rcp = 309.55' inv. out 30" rcp = 309.38' str 9 - top grate = 322.24' inv. in fr 10 - 21" rcp = 316.91' str 10 - top grate = 322.36'
inv. out 21" rcp = 317.51' str 22- curb inlet top = 326.79' inv. in 15" rcp = str 21- curb inlet top = 326.27' inv. out 15" rcp = 322.40' 24" rcp 24" rcp 24" rcp 24" rcp 24 60 25
10 23 20 22 20 24 20 30 20 27 00 26 30 25 80 25 30 25 30 24 20 23 40 24 40 25 60 27 50 27 50 25 40 26 90 27 20 22 40 22 40 22 20 22 30 23 00 25 00 27 00 27 80 3140 30 80 24 00 25 10
27 50 1.4%%% 324 326 324 326 328 330 326 324 22 20 322 322 LOC LOC LOC LOC FAIRFAX ST SE FF=322.40 FF=322.40 FF=322.40 FF=322.60FF=330.20 FF=327.50 FF=327.50 FF=327.50 FF=326.50 FF=325.60
FF=325.00 FF=324.40 FF=324.20 FF=325.30 FF=325.30 FF=325.80 FF=326.30 FF=327.00 FF=327.80 13,400 SF \pxqr;EX. TRASH ENCLOSURE TO REMAIN THIS PORTION OF FAIRFAX STREET WILL BE VACATED
AS FURTHER COORDINATED WITH THE TOWN. NOTE THE VACATION OF FAIRFAX STREET IS NOT REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL OF THIS APPLICATION. HOWEVER, THE VACATION WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED PRIOR TO SITE
PLAN APPROVAL FOR ANY PORTION OF THIS PLAN. \pxqr;{\Fsimplex|c0;\T0.9;\C256;INTERSECTION SHALL BE A RAISED INTERSECTION AND BE SIGNALIZED AS WARRANTED AND COORDINATED WITH VODT AND
THE TOWN OF LEESBURG.} * (GENERAL STREET) EX. PUBLIC STREET (TO BE VACATED) \pxql;PROP. PRIVATE STREET 1,600 200 2,300 \pxqr;BIKE RACK (TYP.) \pxqr;BIKE RACK (TYP.) \pxqr;BIKE RACK
(TYP.) {HIGH STREET PARK} (SEE L SERIES SHEETS FOR HIGH STREET (PRIVATE GENERAL STREET) MADISON COURT PRIVATE ROAD 'A' ONE WAY MADISON COURT ONE WAY (PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL) (RESIDENTIAL)
(RESIDENTIAL) (PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL) LOC \pxqc;6' REINFORCED PEDESTRIAN AREA {COMMON GREEN} (SEE L SERIES SHEETS FOR DETAILS) 46 47 48 49 50 \pxqc;MOUNTABLE CURB 22 40 21 70 22 20 20
5020 70 24 40 23 50 22 90 23 50 324 324 324 322 320 326 328 330 328 326 320 32223 60 26 90 27 60 25 20 24 30 322 322 324 324 326 324 326 TW=329.00 BW=326.50 TW=329.60 BW=328.50 30 10
29 50 26 20 23 10 STEPS REQUIRED 2430 RET. WALL WITH 6' SCREEN WALL ABOVE PROP. R/W FOLLOWING VACATION OF FAIRFAX STREET. R=10' R=10' R=10' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20'
R=20' R=15' R=15' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=45'R=45' R=40' R=40' EYE 2 EYE 1 \pxqr;NOTE: EX. DRY UTILITIES TO BE RELOCATED FROM THIS AREA TO CREATE CORRIDOR FOR SANITARY SEWER
6' SCREEN WALL 6' SCREEN WALL \pxqc;6' REINFORCED PEDESTRIAN AREA 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE \pxqc;NOTE:
NO SIGNAGE OR OBSTRUCTIONS SUCH AS BENCHES WILL BE PLACED IN THE 6' PED. REINFORCED AREA. 236 Item a. 07/03/19 ΡΒ≅Κ∆9 ΡΓ∆∆Σ ΕΗΚ∆ Μν− Οκµµδθρ ∆µφηµδδθρ Κµχρβοδ ≅θβγησδβσρ Κµχ
Ρτθυδξνθρ Τθαµ+ Κσχ− ϖϖϖ−τθαµ,κσχ−βνλ Σδκ− 6/2−531−7/7/ ≅µµµχκδ+ Υηθφηµη 11//2 6601 Κησσκδ Θηυδθ Στθµοηϕδ TM ΟΚ≅Μ Χ≅Σ∆ No.DATEDESCRIPTION Θ∆ΥΗΡΗΝΜΡ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΥΗΚΚ≅Φ∆ ΣΝςΜ ΝΕ Κ∆∆ΡΑΤΘΦ
ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΨΟ,130/ ΨΝΜΗΜΦ Λ≅Ο ≅Λ∆ΜΧΛ∆ΜΣ Ε ∆ Μ Η Φ Μν−/11/37 Χ≅ΥΗΧ Σ− Λβ∆ΚΓ≅Μ∆Ξ Γ Ν ς Μ Ν Λ Λ Κ ≅ Σ ∆ Β Ο Θ Ν Μ Η Υ Ε Ν Η Θ Φ Η Θ ≅ ∆ ∆ ≅ Ρ Ν Μ Η Ρ ∆ Μ Κ 10/27/2021 07/03/19FIRST SUBMISSION
1 02/27/20 02/27/20SECOND SUBMISSION 2 09/25/20 09/25/20THIRD SUBMISSION 3 03/12/21 03/12/21FOURTH SUBMISSION 4 06/29/21 06/29/21FIFTH SUBMISSION 5 10/27/21FINAL PLANNING COMMISSION
SET 6 10/27/21 ΒΝΜΒ∆ΟΣΤ≅Κ ΦΘ≅ΧΗΜΦ ΟΚ≅Μ Β6,/2 0&<2/& {\Fcomplex|c0;MATCH LINE SEE SHEET C7-04} {\Fcomplex|c0;MATCH LINE SEE SHEET C7-02} 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE030
30 60 30 12015 N VA. STATE GRID NORTH 300 EX. FENCE EX. SANITARY SEWER EX. STORM DRAIN EX. WATER LINE EX. FIRE HYDRANT PROPERTY LINE EX. CONTOUR EX. CURB & GUTTER EX. TREE LINE W X
X %%ULEGEND PROP. CURB & GUTTER LOC PROP. CLEARING & GRADING LIMITS PROP. LIGHT PROP. WATER FLOW DIRECTION SCREEN WALL STEEP SLOPES APPROX. LOC. POSSIBLE MAILBOX NOTE: ALL GRADING AND
DRAINAGE ITEMS DEPICTED ON THIS PLAN ARE CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND SHALL BE REQUIRED TO MEET ALL DCSM AND STATE DESIGN CRITERIA AT THE TIME OF FINAL SITE PLAN. ANY CHANGES TO THE GRADING
AND DRAINAGE LAYOUT SHOWN ON THIS PLAN WILL NOT HAVE ANY IMPACT TO THE OVERALL SITE LAYOUT. CATOCTIN CIRCLE C1 S 47°54'41" W 42.48' S 72°49'09" W 52.79' C5 C6 C3 (EX. 70' R.O.W.) FEMA
REGULATORY FLOODWAY REGULATORY FLOODWAY (SEE NOTE 5) S 08°13'41" E 616.79' 299.8NO PARKING NO PARKING S 78°42'25" E 4.92' N 10°52'32" E 7.66' FEMA REGULATORY FLOODWAY & FEMA REGULATORY
FLOODWAY & FEMA ZONE "X" (SEE NOTE 5) FEMA ZONE "X" (SEE NOTE 5) 324.5 323.6 324.3 323.5 323.4 322.4 322.6 322.6 322.3 322.4 321.6 321.8 320.7 321.5 318.5 320.4 320.5 321.5 320.5 319.7
321.6 318.5 319.3 320.7 319.6 318.6 321.7 316.7 317.3 317.2 317.6 317.6 320.6 318.6 319.6 318.1 321.6 318.5 316.5 317.6 316.4 320.5 321.4 322.4 318.2 315.5 318.4 315.5 317.4 314.6 313.6
318.3 313.5 312.6 318.5 311.6 311.5 318.4 317.9 310.5 309.3 309.5 308.5 308.6 308.3 299.6 309.5 307.6 300.4 299.4 294.5 306.3 305.4 299.4 298.8 304.5 296.8 300.3 301.5 303.5 300.8 301.6
301.7 302.5 302.0 301.2 301.1 301.6 18 17 16 15 13 14 12 19 20 11 27" rcp 21" rcp 21" rcp 18" rcp 15" rcp18" rcp 21" rcp 21" rcp 24 26 28 30 128"x83" cmp 128"x83" cmp 128"x83" cmp 128"x83"
cmp 23 25 27 29 31 32 18" rcp 24"x36" elip 24"x36" elip 35 34 33 \pxt1;320 308 310 310 316 314 312 318 320 322 324 322 318 316 314 312 310 306 304 302 322 320 318 316 316 314 312 310
308 298 300 298 300 298 306 304 302 300\pxqc;FLOODPLAN OVERLAY DISTRICT \pxqc;FLOODPLAN OVERLAY DISTRICT \pxqc;FLOODPLAN OVERLAY DISTRICT \pxqc;50' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;50' CREEK
VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;150' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;150' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER 7+00.00 8+00.00 9+00.00 10+00.00 11+00.00 12+00.00 13+00.00 14+00.00 15+00.00 15+31.37 (URBAN BOULEVARD)
STR 23 - inv = 293.71' STR 25 - inv = 293.41' STR 27 - inv = 293.44' STR 29 - inv = 293.71' str 18 - curb inlet top = 318.28' inv. out 18" rcp = 312.16' STR 17 - CURB INLET TOP =
317.70' INV. IN FR 18- 15" RCP = 311.58' INV. OUT 18" RCP = 311.04' str 16 - curb inlet top = 316.52' inv. in fr 17 - 15" rcp = 310.68' inv. in fr 19- 18" rcp = 311.53' inv. out 21"
rcp = 306.59' str 15 - curb inlet top = 309.48' inv. in 21" rcp = 301.95' inv. out 21" rcp = 300.83' str 13 - mh top = 309.27' inv. in fr 15 - 21" rcp = 299.45' inv. in fr 12 - 21"
rcp = 303.93' inv. out 27" rcp = 299.44' str 14 - es 27" inv out = 296.32 str 12 - mh top = 318.24' inv. in 21" rcp = 307.01' inv. out 21" rcp = 306.84' str 11 - top grate = 316.76'
inv. out 21" rcp = 309.59' str 19- curb inlet top = 317.07' inv. in fr 20- 18" rcp = 311.53' inv. out 18" rcp = str 20 - curb inlet top = 317.35' inv. out 18" rcp = 312.80' str 30
inv = 292.41' str 28 - inv = 292.66' str 26 - inv = 292.53' str 24 - inv = 292.55'str 32 - 18" rcp end wall = str 31 - 18" rcp - inv str 38- ew inv. in 15" rcp = 297.86' str 35 - ew
24x36" inv out = 296.63 str 33 - ew 24x36" inv out = 296.42 str 34 - curb inlet - 24x36" inv out = 297.05 STR 17 - CURB INLET TOP = 317.70' INV. IN FR 18- 15" RCP = 311.58' INV. OUT
18" RCP = 311.04' \pxqc;150' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER 24 40 25 60 50 50 40 12 00 12 70 12 50 12 90 07 60 08 40 19 40 19 40 18 80 19 40 22 40 22 40 22 20 22 30 23 00 22 35 22 03 22 20 23
0023 00 25 00 50 322 320 318 316 314 314 320 316 318 308 310 312 324 322 320 318 316 20 00 322 22 20 322 LOC LOC LOC LOC FAIRFAX ST SE FF=322.40 FF=322.40 FF=320.00 FF=318.80 FF=321.70FF=322.60FF=32
7.50 FF=327.50 FF=327.50 FF=326.50 FF=325.60 FF=325.00 FF=324.40 13,400 SF 22 40 22 40 22 40 21 80 320 318 316 TW=315.80 BW=311.20 TW=322.20 BW=322.20 306 308 310 312 TW=319.40 BW=303.50
TW=319.40 BW=304.00 TW=319.40 BW=304.00 04 10 {\W0.75;STAIRS} FF=322.40 (GENERAL STREET) 400 1,200 600 \pxqr;BIKE RACK (TYP.) \pxqr;BIKE RACK (TYP.) \pxqr;LANDSCAPE WALL \pxqr;EX. GUARDRAIL
TO BE REMOVED AS NECESSARY TO CONNECT TO EX. SIDEWALK {OURS OVERLOOK} (SEE L SERIES SHEETS FOR LOC 1733 1783 1583 322 318 320 320 \pxql;BUS STOP. LOCATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE AT FINAL
ENGINEERING AS COORDINATED WITH THE TOWN R=15' R=14' R=15' R=7.5' R=113' R=87' R=10' R=6' R=6' R=10' R=40' R=20' R=40' R=40' R=40' R=40' * 22 20 EYE 5 EYE 3 EYE 4 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE
4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE \A1;50' \A1;150' \pxqr;HARDSCAPE PLAZA WITH MINIMAL SLOPE. DETAILED/MICRO GRADING AND DRAINAGE
TO BE PROVIDED AT TIME OF FINAL SITE PLAN. 237 Item a. 07/03/19 ΡΒ≅Κ∆9 ΡΓ∆∆Σ ΕΗΚ∆ Μν− Οκµµδθρ ∆µφηµδδθρ Κµχρβοδ ≅θβγησδβσρ Κµχ Ρτθυδξνθρ Τθαµ+ Κσχ− ϖϖϖ−τθαµ,κσχ−βνλ Σδκ− 6/2−531−7/7/
≅µµµχκδ+ Υηθφηµη 11//2 6601 Κησσκδ Θηυδθ Στθµοηϕδ TM ΟΚ≅Μ Χ≅Σ∆ No.DATEDESCRIPTION Θ∆ΥΗΡΗΝΜΡ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΥΗΚΚ≅Φ∆ ΣΝςΜ ΝΕ Κ∆∆ΡΑΤΘΦ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΨΟ,130/ ΨΝΜΗΜΦ Λ≅Ο ≅Λ∆ΜΧΛ∆ΜΣ Ε ∆ Μ Η Φ Μν−/11/37
Χ≅ΥΗΧ Σ− Λβ∆ΚΓ≅Μ∆Ξ Γ Ν ς Μ Ν Λ Λ Κ ≅ Σ ∆ Β Ο Θ Ν Μ Η Υ Ε Ν Η Θ Φ Η Θ ≅ ∆ ∆ ≅ Ρ Ν Μ Η Ρ ∆ Μ Κ 10/27/2021 07/03/19FIRST SUBMISSION 1 02/27/20 02/27/20SECOND SUBMISSION 2 09/25/20 09/25/20THIRD
SUBMISSION 3 03/12/21 03/12/21FOURTH SUBMISSION 4 06/29/21 06/29/21FIFTH SUBMISSION 5 10/27/21FINAL PLANNING COMMISSION SET 6 10/27/21 ΒΝΜΒ∆ΟΣΤ≅Κ ΦΘ≅ΧΗΜΦ ΟΚ≅Μ Β6,/3 0&<2/& {\Fcomplex|c0;MATCH
LINE SEE SHEET C7-03} {\Fcomplex|c0;MATCH LINE SEE SHEET C7-01} 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE030 30 60 30 12015 N VA. STATE GRID NORTH 300 EX. FENCE EX. SANITARY SEWER
EX. STORM DRAIN EX. WATER LINE EX. FIRE HYDRANT PROPERTY LINE EX. CONTOUR EX. CURB & GUTTER EX. TREE LINE W X X %%ULEGEND PROP. CURB & GUTTER LOC PROP. CLEARING & GRADING LIMITS PROP.
LIGHT PROP. WATER FLOW DIRECTION SCREEN WALL STEEP SLOPES {NOTE:} THE PROPOSED STRUCTURAL DESIGN FOR THE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE LOCATED WITHIN THE FLOODPLAIN WILL ACCOUNT FOR SCOUR APPROX.
LOC. POSSIBLE MAILBOX NOTE: ALL GRADING AND DRAINAGE ITEMS DEPICTED ON THIS PLAN ARE CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND SHALL BE REQUIRED TO MEET ALL DCSM AND STATE DESIGN CRITERIA AT THE TIME
OF FINAL SITE PLAN. ANY CHANGES TO THE GRADING AND DRAINAGE LAYOUT SHOWN ON THIS PLAN WILL NOT HAVE ANY IMPACT TO THE OVERALL SITE LAYOUT. HARRISON STREET SE N 59°34'51" E 323.58' S
08°13'41" E 616.79' (EX. 70' R.O.W.) REGULATORY FLOODWAY (SEE NOTE 5) 299.8NO PARKING NO PARKING FEMA REGULATO RY FLOODWAY FEMA ZONE "X" (SEE NOTE 5) S 66°00'35" E 415.54' S 66°00'35"
E 415.54' LINE PER D.B. 708 PG.37 LINE PER D.B. 349 PG. 229 318.5 316.7 317.2 318.2 318.3 318.5 317.9 301.4 300.3 301.4 299.6 299.3 298.8 302.7 300.4 299.4 300.7 301.4 300.7 301.7 300.6
299.4 301.6 302.8 299.5 304.2 298.8 303.4 304.8 304.3 302.4 301.6 303.5 301.5 302.3 300.8 301.6 301.2 12 7 6 11 38 37 21" rcp 21" rcp 42" rcp 15" rcp str 41 inv. in 24" rcp = 298.52'
str 39inv. in 18" rcp = 298.76' str 42- ew inv. in 24" rcp = 299.39' str 40- ew inv. in 18" rcp = 299.46' 41 42 39 40 24" rcp 18" rcp 24"x36" elip 24"x36" elip 35 34 302 304 306 308
306 308 310 300 308 306 310 314 318 320 322 316 314 312 310 308 300 298 300 306 304 302 300 \pxqc;FLOODPLAN OVERLAY DISTRICT \pxqc;FLOODPLAN OVERLAY DISTRICT \pxqc;FLOODPLAN OVERLAY
DISTRICT \pxqc;50' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;50' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;50' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;150' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;150' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER PIN # 231-18-6244 MADISON
HOUSE ASSOCIATES II LP INSTR. # PIN # 231-18-7370 {TOWN OF LEESBURG D.B. 874 PG 210} str 12 - mh top = 318.24' inv. in 21" rcp = 307.01' inv. out 21" rcp = 306.84' str 11 - top grate
= 316.76' inv. out 21" rcp = 309.59' str 6 - top = 311.17' inv. in 42" rcp = 303.27' inv. out 42" rcp str 6 - es inv. out 42" rcp = 302.03' str 38- ew inv. in 15" rcp = 297.86' str
41 inv. in 24" rcp = 298.52' str 39inv. in 18" rcp = 298.76' str 42- ew inv. in 24" rcp = 299.39' str 40- ew inv. in 18" rcp = 299.46' str 35 - ew 24x36" inv out = 296.63 str 34 - curb
inlet - 24x36" inv out = 297.05 \pxqc;150' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;150' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;150' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER 19 40 18 80 19 40 22 40 22 40 20 22 30 22 35 20 00 322
LOC LOC LOC FF=322.40 FF=322.40 FF=320.00 BRIDGE 22 40 22 40 1460 22 40 21 80 17 70 320 318 316 314 TW=315.80 BW=311.20 TW=315.80 BW=311.00 TW=317.70 BW=304.50 TW=322.20 BW=322.20 TW=317.70
BW=305.00TW=321.20 BW=320.70 304 306 308 310 312 TW=319.40 BW=303.50 TW=319.40 BW=304.00 TW=319.40 BW=304.00 04 10 {\W0.75;STAIRS} FF=322.40 \pxqr;POSSIBLE APPROX. ALTERNATE LIMITS
OF CLEARING AND GRADING FOR EXCAVATION IN THE FLOODPLAIN TO MITIGATE RISE IN THE FLOODPLAIN WATER SURFACE ELEVATION IF NECESSARY. \pxqr;BIKE RACK (TYP.) {OURS OVERLOOK} (SEE L SERIES
SHEETS FOR DETAILS) \pxqr;EXISTING 42" RCP TO BE REMOVED. 316 314 312 310 308 06 30 RAMP LOC 1733 1783 1583 322 318 320 320 318 PIER \px 99 00 02 30 RAMP PIER RAISED PLATFORM ABUTMENT
LOC LOC LOCTHE APPLICANT UNDERSTANDS THAT ANY CHANGES TO THE FLOODPLAIN OR CHANNEL, NOT SHOWN ON THIS REZONING AND SPECIAL EXCEPTION APPLICATION, AS WELL AS ANYTHING THAT MAY CAUSE
A RISE IN THE FLOODPLAIN ON THIS OR ANY ADJACENT PROPERTIES WILL REQUIRE A NEW SPECIAL EXCEPTION PLAN, WHICH WILL INCLUDE ADDITIONAL MEETINGS WITH THE TOWN COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION
HEARINGS. 316 PROP. SCREEN WALL 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE \A1;50' \A1;150' \pxqr;HARDSCAPE PLAZA WITH MINIMAL SLOPE. DETAILED/MICRO GRADING AND DRAINAGE TO BE PROVIDED AT TIME OF FINAL
SITE PLAN. 238 Item a. 07/03/19 ΡΒ≅Κ∆9 ΡΓ∆∆Σ ΕΗΚ∆ Μν− Οκµµδθρ ∆µφηµδδθρ Κµχρβοδ ≅θβγησδβσρ Κµχ Ρτθυδξνθρ Τθαµ+ Κσχ− ϖϖϖ−τθαµ,κσχ−βνλ Σδκ− 6/2−531−7/7/ ≅µµµχκδ+ Υηθφηµη 11//2
6601 Κησσκδ Θηυδθ Στθµοηϕδ TM ΟΚ≅Μ Χ≅Σ∆ No.DATEDESCRIPTION Θ∆ΥΗΡΗΝΜΡ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΥΗΚΚ≅Φ∆ ΣΝςΜ ΝΕ Κ∆∆ΡΑΤΘΦ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΨΟ,130/ ΨΝΜΗΜΦ Λ≅Ο ≅Λ∆ΜΧΛ∆ΜΣ Ε ∆ Μ Η Φ Μν−/11/37 Χ≅ΥΗΧ Σ− Λβ∆ΚΓ≅Μ∆Ξ Γ
Ν ς Μ Ν Λ Λ Κ ≅ Σ ∆ Β Ο Θ Ν Μ Η Υ Ε Ν Η Θ Φ Η Θ ≅ ∆ ∆ ≅ Ρ Ν Μ Η Ρ ∆ Μ Κ 10/27/2021 07/03/19FIRST SUBMISSION 1 02/27/20 02/27/20SECOND SUBMISSION 2 09/25/20 09/25/20THIRD SUBMISSION
3 03/12/21 03/12/21FOURTH SUBMISSION 4 06/29/21 06/29/21FIFTH SUBMISSION 5 10/27/21FINAL PLANNING COMMISSION SET 6 10/27/21 ΝΟ∆Μ ΡΟ≅Β∆ ∆ΩΓΗΑΗΣ , Θ∆ΛΝΥ∆Χ Β7,/0 Μ.≅ THE CONTENT ON THIS
SHEET HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THE APPLICATION AND THE SHEET IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK 239 Item a. 07/03/19 ΡΒ≅Κ∆9 ΡΓ∆∆Σ ΕΗΚ∆ Μν− Οκµµδθρ ∆µφηµδδθρ Κµχρβοδ ≅θβγησδβσρ Κµχ Ρτθυδξνθρ
Τθαµ+ Κσχ− ϖϖϖ−τθαµ,κσχ−βνλ Σδκ− 6/2−531−7/7/ ≅µµµχκδ+ Υηθφηµη 11//2 6601 Κησσκδ Θηυδθ Στθµοηϕδ TM ΟΚ≅Μ Χ≅Σ∆ No.DATEDESCRIPTION Θ∆ΥΗΡΗΝΜΡ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΥΗΚΚ≅Φ∆ ΣΝςΜ ΝΕ Κ∆∆ΡΑΤΘΦ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅
ΨΟ,130/ ΨΝΜΗΜΦ Λ≅Ο ≅Λ∆ΜΧΛ∆ΜΣ Ε ∆ Μ Η Φ Μν−/11/37 Χ≅ΥΗΧ Σ− Λβ∆ΚΓ≅Μ∆Ξ Γ Ν ς Μ Ν Λ Λ Κ ≅ Σ ∆ Β Ο Θ Ν Μ Η Υ Ε Ν Η Θ Φ Η Θ ≅ ∆ ∆ ≅ Ρ Ν Μ Η Ρ ∆ Μ Κ 10/27/2021 07/03/19FIRST SUBMISSION 1 02/27/20
02/27/20SECOND SUBMISSION 2 09/25/20 09/25/20THIRD SUBMISSION 3 03/12/21 03/12/21FOURTH SUBMISSION 4 06/29/21 06/29/21FIFTH SUBMISSION 5 10/27/21FINAL PLANNING COMMISSION SET 6 10/27/21
ΑΛΟ Λ≅Ο % ΒΝΛΟΤΣ≅ΣΗΝΜΡ Β8,/0 0! < 0//& WATER QUALITY NARRATIVE THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS A MIXED USE (RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL) ON AN EXISTING COMMERCIAL LOT ON THE NORTH OF CATOCTIN
CIRCLE AND EAST OF KING STREET. THEREFORE, THE SITE HAS BEEN ANALYZED USING THE VRRM REDEVELOPMENT SPREADSHEET. THE SITE IS DEFINED AS THE PROPERTY BOUNDARY EXCLUDING THE AREA WITHIN
THE FEMA DEFINED FLOODPLAIN, EXCEPT FOR THE MINOR DISTURBANCE FOR THE TRAIL AND OUTFALL CHANNELS WITHIN THE FEMA FLOODPLAIN, WHICH HAS BEEN INCLUDED AS PART OF THE SITE. ADDITIONALLY,
ALL OFFSITE DISTURBANCES ARE INCLUDED AS PART OF THE SITE. SECTION 14.1.1 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE ESTABLISHES THE PURPOSE OF THE CREEK VALLEY BUFFER AS PROVIDING A SETBACK AREA FROM
THE CHANNEL SCAR LINE TO GOVERN THE CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, PARKING AND OTHER IMPERVIOUS SURFACES IN AREAS ADJACENT TO MAJOR STREAM AREAS DRAINING GREATER THAN 640 ACRES.
AS SHOWN ON THIS SHEET, THERE IS A MINOR PORTION OF BUILDING D WITHIN THE 50' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER. THEREFORE, PER SECTION 14.2.2.B OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, BMPs SHALL PROVIDE WATER
QUALITY BENEFITS EQUAL TO 1.5 TIMES THE EQUIVALENT OF WHAT THE DISTURBED BUFFER AREA WOULD HAVE PROVIDED IF IT WERE IN A GOOD QUALITY FORESTED CONDITION FOR THE PORTION OF THE BUFFER
AREA DISTURBED CLOSER THAN 50 FEET. A SEPARATE SPREADSHEET HAS BEEN PROVIDED IN ORDER TO CALCULATE THIS AREA AND HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE REQUIRED REMOVAL PER THE VRRM REDEVELOPMENT SPREADSHEET.
THE SITE DIRECTLY DISCHARGES TO A KNOWN MAJOR FLOODPLAIN - "TOWN BRANCH." IN ORDER TO MEET THE CURRENT WATER QUALITY REQUIREMENTS, THIS CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT PROPOSES AN UNDERGROUND
DETENTION/FILTER FACILITY AND A MANUFACTURED FILTERING DEVICE AS SHOWN ON THE CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT PLAN. A PRELIMINARY BMP MAP IS PROVIDED ON THIS SHEET AND PRELIMINARY BMP COMPUTATIONS
ARE PROVIDED ON SHEETS C9-02 & C9-03. AS SHOWN IN THE COMPUTATIONS, THE BMP REQUIREMENT IS MET WITH THE USE OF THE PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED BMP FACILITIES AS SHOWN ON THIS SHEET. SEE SHEETS
C10-01 THROUGH C10-03 FOR STORMWATER QUANTITY COMPUTATIONS AND NARRATIVE. 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE0100 100 200 100 40050 N VA. STATE GRID NORTH %%ULEGEND DRAINAGE
DIVIDE ONSITE BMP DRAINAGE AREA (TO BMP UNDERGROUND DETENTION/FILTER, FACILITY F1) STORM WATER MANAGEMENT FACILITYNOTE: ALL STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND WATER QUALITY CONTROLS AND COMPUTATIONS
SHOWN HEREON ARE CONCEPTUAL AND SUBJECT TO FINAL ENGINEERING/SITE PLAN. PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE FINAL SITE PLAN FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, THE APPLICANT WILL VERIFY THAT STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT AND BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR STORM WATER QUALITY FOR THE SITE ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL TOWN AND STATE CRITERIA INCLUDING THE TOWN OF LEESBURG STORM WATER MASTER PLAN
CRITERIA, THE LATEST VERSIONS OF THE VIRGINIA STORM WATER MANAGEMENT HANDBOOK, AND THE TOWN'S DCSM, WHICHEVER IS MORE RESTRICTIVE AT TIME OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL. SITE AREA OFFSITE DRAINAGE
AREA TO ONSITE FACILITY (THIS AREA ONLY USED FOR SIZING PURPOSES AND DOES NOT TAKE PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL CREDIT) ONSITE BMP DRAINAGE AREA (TO MANUFACTURED FILTER, FACILITY F2) 50' CREEK
VALLEY BUFFER FAIRFAX STREET SE CATOCTIN CIRCLE SE HARRISON STREET SE CATOCTIN CIRCLE (EX. 70' R.O.W.) (EX. 70' R.O.W.) (EX. 70' R.O.W.) (EX. 50' R.O.W.) MADISON COURT S KING STREET
302 304 306 308 330 334 334 336 332 330 328 326 324 336 334 332 330 328 334 332 330 328 \pxt1;320 328 330 308 306 308 310 300 308 322 318 320 306 310 308 322 310 316 314 312 336 310
312 314 316 318 320 322 324 326 328 310 314 318 320 322 324 326 328 330 326 320 322 324 332 330 328 340 338 336 334 332 326 324 322 318 316 314 312 310 306 304 302 322 320 318 316 316
314 312 310308 300 298 300 298 300 298 306 304 302 300 EX. EP EX. EP FAIRFAX STREET SE 324 323 323 322321 (URBAN BOULEVARD) (URBAN BOULEVARD) 311.83 312.42 312.26 312.59 312.64 312.89
312.09 311.88 311.63 311.99 311.72 311.76 311.48 311.62 311.50 310.91 310.25 310.97 314.59 313.62 312.49 311.87 311.85 311.69 311.52 311.38 311.28 311.37 311.24 313.46 312.34 311.78
311.75 311.57 311.52 311.28 311.25 311.29 311.18 314.47 ONSITE DA = 6.43 AC (TO POTENTIAL BMP UNDERGROUND DETENTION/FILTER FACILITY, F1) OFFSITE DA= 20.22 AC (TO POTENTIAL BMP UNDERGROUND
DETENTION/FILTER FACILITY) *THIS AREA ONLY CONSIDERED FOR FACILITY SIZING PURPOSES. NO PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL CREDIT IS BEING TAKEN FOR OFFSITE AREA. 324 326 324 326 322 320 318 316 314
314 320 316 318 308 310 312 328 330 326 324 322 320 318 316 322 322 322 320 318 316 314 318 304 306 308 310 312 ONLY ONLY ONLY ONLY ONLY ONLY 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 1 23 24 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 22 324 324 324 322 322 320 320 320 320 320 322 322 322 324 322 322 324 326
328 330 328 326 324 322 324 326 328 330 334 332 330 328 326 324 324 322 320 318 318 318 318 318 318 320 322 316 314 312 324 328 324 322 322 324 324 318 316 314 318 316 322 326 324 326
316 314 312 310 308 316 314 312 322 318 320 320 318 R=12' R=10' R=15' R=15' R=12' R=10' R=25' R=24' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=44' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=44'
R=10' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=14' R=15' R=7.5' R=113' R=87' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=6' R=6' R=10' R=40' R=20'
R=40' R=40' R=40'R=40' R=45' R=45' R=40' R=40' EYE 2 EYE 5 EYE 1 EYE 3 EYE 4 316 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION
ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE \pxqc;50' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER NOTE THE PEDESTRIAN TRAIL WAS NOT CONSIDERED AS CONSTRUCTION
OF AN IMPERVIOUS SURFACE WITHIN THE 50' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER BECAUSE IT IS SUSPENDED IN THE AIR ABOVE THE BUFFER. AREA EXCLUDED FROM SITE REDEVELOPMENT SPREADSHEET AND INCLUDED IN CREEK
VALLEY BUFFER ENCROACHMENT SPREADSHEET. OFFSITE DA = 0.18 AC (TO POTENTIAL MANUFACTURED FILTER FACILITY) ONSITE DA = 4.41 AC (TO POTENTIAL MANUFACTURED FILTER FACILITY, F2) POTENTIAL
MANUFACTURED FILTER FACILITY, F2 \pxqc;50' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER POTENTIAL BMP UNDERGROUND DETENTION/FILTER FACILITY, F1 240 Item a. 07/03/19 ΡΒ≅Κ∆9 ΡΓ∆∆Σ ΕΗΚ∆ Μν− Οκµµδθρ ∆µφηµδδθρ
Κµχρβοδ ≅θβγησδβσρ Κµχ Ρτθυδξνθρ Τθαµ+ Κσχ− ϖϖϖ−τθαµ,κσχ−βνλ Σδκ− 6/2−531−7/7/ ≅µµµχκδ+ Υηθφηµη 11//2 6601 Κησσκδ Θηυδθ Στθµοηϕδ TM ΟΚ≅Μ Χ≅Σ∆ No.DATEDESCRIPTION Θ∆ΥΗΡΗΝΜΡ
ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΥΗΚΚ≅Φ∆ ΣΝςΜ ΝΕ Κ∆∆ΡΑΤΘΦ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΨΟ,130/ ΨΝΜΗΜΦ Λ≅Ο ≅Λ∆ΜΧΛ∆ΜΣ Ε ∆ Μ Η Φ Μν−/11/37 Χ≅ΥΗΧ Σ− Λβ∆ΚΓ≅Μ∆Ξ Γ Ν ς Μ Ν Λ Λ Κ ≅ Σ ∆ Β Ο Θ Ν Μ Η Υ Ε Ν Η Θ Φ Η Θ ≅ ∆ ∆ ≅ Ρ Ν Μ Η Ρ ∆
Μ Κ 10/27/2021 07/03/19FIRST SUBMISSION 1 02/27/20 02/27/20SECOND SUBMISSION 2 09/25/20 09/25/20THIRD SUBMISSION 3 03/12/21 03/12/21FOURTH SUBMISSION 4 06/29/21 06/29/21FIFTH SUBMISSION
5 10/27/21FINAL PLANNING COMMISSION SET 6 10/27/21 ΑΛΟ ΒΝΛΟΤΣ≅ΣΗΝΜΡ Β8,/1 Μ.≅ 50' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER IMPERVIOUS CONSTRUCTION VRRM SPREADSHEETREDEVELOPMENT VRRM SPREADSHEET AS SHOWN
ON THIS SHEET, THE REQUIRED PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL IS A SUM OF THE REQUIRED PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL FROM THE REDEVELOPMENT SPREADSHEET AND THE 50' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER IMPERVIOUS CONSTRUCTION
SPREADSHEET. THEREFORE THE TOTAL REQUIRED PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL FOR THE SITE IS 8.82 + (1.5 X 0.02) = 8.85 LB/YR NOTE IF IT IS DETERMINED AND DEMONSTRATED AT TIME OF FINAL SITE PLAN THAT
THERE ARE NO BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, PARKING OR OTHER IMPERVIOUS SURFACES WITHIN THE 50' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER, THEN THIS SPREADSHEET WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE ANALYSIS AND THE REQUIREMENTS
PER SECTION 14.2.2.A OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE WILL NO LONGER APPLY. NOTE: ALL STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND WATER QUALITY CONTROLS AND COMPUTATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE CONCEPTUAL AND SUBJECT
TO FINAL ENGINEERING/SITE PLAN. PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE FINAL SITE PLAN FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, THE APPLICANT WILL VERIFY THAT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
FOR STORM WATER QUALITY FOR THE SITE ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL TOWN AND STATE CRITERIA INCLUDING THE TOWN OF LEESBURG STORM WATER MASTER PLAN CRITERIA, THE LATEST VERSIONS OF THE
VIRGINIA STORM WATER MANAGEMENT HANDBOOK, AND THE TOWN'S DCSM, WHICHEVER IS MORE RESTRICTIVE AT TIME OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL. 241 Item a. 07/03/19 ΡΒ≅Κ∆9 ΡΓ∆∆Σ ΕΗΚ∆ Μν− Οκµµδθρ ∆µφηµδδθρ
Κµχρβοδ ≅θβγησδβσρ Κµχ Ρτθυδξνθρ Τθαµ+ Κσχ− ϖϖϖ−τθαµ,κσχ−βνλ Σδκ− 6/2−531−7/7/ ≅µµµχκδ+ Υηθφηµη 11//2 6601 Κησσκδ Θηυδθ Στθµοηϕδ TM ΟΚ≅Μ Χ≅Σ∆ No.DATEDESCRIPTION Θ∆ΥΗΡΗΝΜΡ
ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΥΗΚΚ≅Φ∆ ΣΝςΜ ΝΕ Κ∆∆ΡΑΤΘΦ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΨΟ,130/ ΨΝΜΗΜΦ Λ≅Ο ≅Λ∆ΜΧΛ∆ΜΣ Ε ∆ Μ Η Φ Μν−/11/37 Χ≅ΥΗΧ Σ− Λβ∆ΚΓ≅Μ∆Ξ Γ Ν ς Μ Ν Λ Λ Κ ≅ Σ ∆ Β Ο Θ Ν Μ Η Υ Ε Ν Η Θ Φ Η Θ ≅ ∆ ∆ ≅ Ρ Ν Μ Η Ρ ∆
Μ Κ 10/27/2021 07/03/19FIRST SUBMISSION 1 02/27/20 02/27/20SECOND SUBMISSION 2 09/25/20 09/25/20THIRD SUBMISSION 3 03/12/21 03/12/21FOURTH SUBMISSION 4 06/29/21 06/29/21FIFTH SUBMISSION
5 10/27/21FINAL PLANNING COMMISSION SET 6 10/27/21 ΑΛΟ ΒΝΛΟΤΣ≅ΣΗΝΜΡ Β8,/2 Μ.≅ REDEVELOPMENT BMP COMPUTATIONS - ONSITE DRAINAGE TO FACILITY F1 THE TOTAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL ACHIEVED
ONSITE IS 9.55 LB/YR, WHICH EXCEEDS THE REQUIRED REMOVAL OF 8.85 LB/YR BY 0.70 LB/YR. THEREFORE, THE REQUIRED PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL IS ACHIEVED. REDEVELOPMENT BMP COMPUTATIONS - ONSITE
DRAINAGE TO FACILITY F2 WATER QUALITY COMPLIANCE NOTE: ALL STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND WATER QUALITY CONTROLS AND COMPUTATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE CONCEPTUAL AND SUBJECT TO FINAL ENGINEERING/SITE
PLAN. PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE FINAL SITE PLAN FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, THE APPLICANT WILL VERIFY THAT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR STORM WATER QUALITY FOR
THE SITE ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL TOWN AND STATE CRITERIA INCLUDING THE TOWN OF LEESBURG STORM WATER MASTER PLAN CRITERIA, THE LATEST VERSIONS OF THE VIRGINIA STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
HANDBOOK, AND THE TOWN'S DCSM, WHICHEVER IS MORE RESTRICTIVE AT TIME OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL. 242 Item a. 07/03/19 ΡΒ≅Κ∆9 ΡΓ∆∆Σ ΕΗΚ∆ Μν− Οκµµδθρ ∆µφηµδδθρ Κµχρβοδ ≅θβγησδβσρ Κµχ
Ρτθυδξνθρ Τθαµ+ Κσχ− ϖϖϖ−τθαµ,κσχ−βνλ Σδκ− 6/2−531−7/7/ ≅µµµχκδ+ Υηθφηµη 11//2 6601 Κησσκδ Θηυδθ Στθµοηϕδ TM ΟΚ≅Μ Χ≅Σ∆ No.DATEDESCRIPTION Θ∆ΥΗΡΗΝΜΡ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΥΗΚΚ≅Φ∆ ΣΝςΜ ΝΕ Κ∆∆ΡΑΤΘΦ
ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΨΟ,130/ ΨΝΜΗΜΦ Λ≅Ο ≅Λ∆ΜΧΛ∆ΜΣ Ε ∆ Μ Η Φ Μν−/11/37 Χ≅ΥΗΧ Σ− Λβ∆ΚΓ≅Μ∆Ξ Γ Ν ς Μ Ν Λ Λ Κ ≅ Σ ∆ Β Ο Θ Ν Μ Η Υ Ε Ν Η Θ Φ Η Θ ≅ ∆ ∆ ≅ Ρ Ν Μ Η Ρ ∆ Μ Κ 10/27/2021 07/03/19FIRST SUBMISSION
1 02/27/20 02/27/20SECOND SUBMISSION 2 09/25/20 09/25/20THIRD SUBMISSION 3 03/12/21 03/12/21FOURTH SUBMISSION 4 06/29/21 06/29/21FIFTH SUBMISSION 5 10/27/21FINAL PLANNING COMMISSION
SET 6 10/27/21 ΡςΛ Λ≅Ο ≅ΜΧ ΒΝΛΟΤΣ≅ΣΗΝΜΡ Β0/,/0 0&<1//& PRE-DEVELOPMENT TC PATH AND DRAINAGE DIVIDE MAP POST-DEVELOPMENT TC PATH AND DRAINAGE DIVIDE MAP LEGEND = Tc Flowpath = Drainage
Divide Boundary 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE0200 200 400 200 1600100 N VA. STATE GRID NORTH = Site Boundary NOTE: ALL STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND WATER QUALITY CONTROLS
AND COMPUTATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE CONCEPTUAL AND SUBJECT TO FINAL ENGINEERING/SITE PLAN. PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE FINAL SITE PLAN FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, THE APPLICANT WILL VERIFY
THAT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR STORM WATER QUALITY FOR THE SITE ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL TOWN AND STATE CRITERIA INCLUDING THE TOWN OF LEESBURG STORM
WATER MASTER PLAN CRITERIA, THE LATEST VERSIONS OF THE VIRGINIA STORM WATER MANAGEMENT HANDBOOK, AND THE TOWN'S DCSM, WHICHEVER IS MORE RESTRICTIVE AT TIME OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL. FAIRFAX
STREET SE CATOCTIN CIRCLE SE HARRISON STREET SE CATOCTIN CIRCLE (EX. 70' R.O.W.) (EX. 70' R.O.W.) (EX. 70' R.O.W.) (EX. 50' R.O.W.) MADISON COURT NO PARKING NO PARKING S KING STREET
302 304 306 308 330 334 334 336 332 330 328 326 324 336 334 332 330 328 334 332 330 328 \pxt1;320 328 330 308 306 308 310 300 308 322 318 320 306 310 308 322 310 316 314 312 336 310
312 314 316 318 320 322 324 326 328 310 314 318 320 322 324 326 328 330 326 320 322 324 332 330 328 340 338 336 334 332 326 324 322 318 316 314 312 310 306 304 302 322 320 318 316 316
314 312 310308 300 298 300 298 300 298 306 304 302 300 EX. EP FAIRFAX STREET SE 324 323 323 322321 (URBAN BOULEVARD) (URBAN BOULEVARD) 311.83 312.42 312.26 312.59 312.64 312.89 312.09
311.63 311.76 311.62 310.97 313.62 312.49 311.87 311.85 311.69 311.52 311.38 311.28 311.37 313.46 312.34 311.57 311.52 311.25 311.29 311.18 TOTAL OFFSITE AREA TO OUTFALL #1 DA=27.70
AC CN=89 TC=25 MIN. TOTAL ONSITE AREA TO OUTFALL #1 DA=17.54 AC CN=88 TC=18 MIN. TOTAL OFFSITE AREA TO OUTFALL #1 DA=27.70 AC CN=89 TC=25 MIN. TOTAL OFFSITE AREA TO OUTFALL #1 DA=27.70
AC CN=89 OUTFALL #1 EYE 2 EYE 5 EYE 1 EYE 3 EYE 4 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE
A B C D E A1 B1 C1 F FAIRFAX STREET SE CATOCTIN CIRCLE SE HARRISON STREET SE CATOCTIN CIRCLE (EX. 70' R.O.W.) (EX. 70' R.O.W.) (EX. 70' R.O.W.) (EX. 50' R.O.W.) MADISON COURT NO PARKING
NO PARKING S KING STREET 302 304 306 308 330 334 334 336 332 330 328 326 324 336 334 332 330 328 334 332 330 328 \pxt1;320 328 330 308 306 308 310 300 308 322 318 320 306 310 308 322
310 316 314 312 336 310 312 314 316 318 320 322 324 326 328 310 314 318 320 322 324 326 328 330 326 320 322 324 332 330 328 340 338 336 334 332 326 324 322 318 316 314 312 310 306 304
302 322 320 318 316 316 314 312 310308 300 298 300 298 300 298 306 304 302 300 EX. EP EX. EP FAIRFAX STREET SE 324 323 323 322321 (URBAN BOULEVARD) (URBAN BOULEVARD) 311.83 312.42 312.59
312.64 312.89 312.09 311.63 311.76 311.48 311.62 310.97 313.62 312.49 311.85 311.69 311.38 311.28 311.37 311.57 311.25 311.18TOTAL OFFSITE AREA TO FACILITY F1 (OUTFALL #1) DA=20.33
AC CN=89 TC=25 MIN. TOTAL OFFSITE AREA BYPASS TO OUTFALL #1 DA=7.33 AC CN=88 TC=25 MIN. TOTAL OFFSITE AREA BYPASS TO OUTFALL #1 DA=7.33 AC CN=88 OUTFALL #1 324 326 324 326 322 320
318 316 314 314 320 316 318 308 310 312 328 330 326 324 322 320 318 316 322 322 322 320 318 316314 318 304 306 308 310312 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 25 26 27
28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 1 23 24 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 22 324 324 324 322 322 320 320 320 320 320 322 322 322 324 322 322 324 326 328 330 328 326 324
322 324 326 328 330 334 332 330 328 326 324 324 322 320 318 318 318 318 318 318 320 322 316 314 312 324 328 324 322 322 324 324 318 316 314 318 316 322 326 324 326 316 314 312 310 308
316 314 312 322 318 320 320 318 R=12' R=10' R=15' R=15' R=12' R=10' R=25' R=24' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=44' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=44' R=10' R=10' R=10'
R=10' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=14' R=15' R=7.5' R=113' R=87' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=6' R=6' R=10' R=40' R=20' R=40' R=40' R=40'R=40'
R=45' R=45' R=40' R=40' EYE 2 EYE 5 EYE 1 EYE 3 EYE 4 316 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION
ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONETOTAL ONSITE AREA BYPASS TO OUTFALL #1 DA=11.16 AC CN=91 TC=7 MIN. TOTAL ONSITE AREA TO FACILITY F1 (OUTFALL #1A) DA=6.43 AC CN=94 TC=12 MIN. A B C D D F
A1 B1 C1 D G E A B C D 243 Item a. 07/03/19 ΡΒ≅Κ∆9 ΡΓ∆∆Σ ΕΗΚ∆ Μν− Οκµµδθρ ∆µφηµδδθρ Κµχρβοδ ≅θβγησδβσρ Κµχ Ρτθυδξνθρ Τθαµ+ Κσχ− ϖϖϖ−τθαµ,κσχ−βνλ Σδκ− 6/2−531−7/7/ ≅µµµχκδ+
Υηθφηµη 11//2 6601 Κησσκδ Θηυδθ Στθµοηϕδ TM ΟΚ≅Μ Χ≅Σ∆ No.DATEDESCRIPTION Θ∆ΥΗΡΗΝΜΡ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΥΗΚΚ≅Φ∆ ΣΝςΜ ΝΕ Κ∆∆ΡΑΤΘΦ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΨΟ,130/ ΨΝΜΗΜΦ Λ≅Ο ≅Λ∆ΜΧΛ∆ΜΣ Ε ∆ Μ Η Φ Μν−/11/37 Χ≅ΥΗΧ
Σ− Λβ∆ΚΓ≅Μ∆Ξ Γ Ν ς Μ Ν Λ Λ Κ ≅ Σ ∆ Β Ο Θ Ν Μ Η Υ Ε Ν Η Θ Φ Η Θ ≅ ∆ ∆ ≅ Ρ Ν Μ Η Ρ ∆ Μ Κ 10/27/2021 07/03/19FIRST SUBMISSION 1 02/27/20 02/27/20SECOND SUBMISSION 2 09/25/20 09/25/20THIRD
SUBMISSION 3 03/12/21 03/12/21FOURTH SUBMISSION 4 06/29/21 06/29/21FIFTH SUBMISSION 5 10/27/21FINAL PLANNING COMMISSION SET 6 10/27/21 ΡςΛ ΒΝΛΟΤΣ≅ΣΗΝΜΡ Β0/,/1 0! < 0//& OFFSITE LAND
COVER TYPE LEGEND = Commercial and Business = 1/8 Acre Lot (Town Houses) Note the Madison House Apartments was used for this Land Cover type because the 65% imperviousness was appropriate
and there is no 'Apartment' category in TR-55. = 1/4 Acre Lot = Roads *NOTE ALL CN WERE CALCULATED USING THE TR-55 CN VALUES FOR OFFSITE AREAS ONLY USING THE ABOVE LISTED COVER DESCRIPTIONS
AND THE APPROPRIATE SOIL TYPES LAND COVER TYPE AND SOILS MAP = Proposed Drainage Divide Boundary = Site Boundary XX = Soil Type Delineation and Label GENERAL LEGEND NOTE: ALL STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT AND WATER QUALITY CONTROLS AND COMPUTATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE CONCEPTUAL AND SUBJECT TO FINAL ENGINEERING/SITE PLAN. PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE FINAL SITE PLAN FOR THE SUBJECT
PROPERTY, THE APPLICANT WILL VERIFY THAT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR STORM WATER QUALITY FOR THE SITE ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL TOWN AND STATE CRITERIA
INCLUDING THE TOWN OF LEESBURG STORM WATER MASTER PLAN CRITERIA, THE LATEST VERSIONS OF THE VIRGINIA STORM WATER MANAGEMENT HANDBOOK, AND THE TOWN'S DCSM, WHICHEVER IS MORE RESTRICTIVE
AT TIME OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL. NO PARKING NO PARKING EX. EP EX. EP EX. SHOULDER 311.83 312.42 312.26 312.59 312.64 312.89 312.09 311.88 311.63 311.99 311.72 311.76 311.48 311.62 311.50
310.91 310.25 310.97 314.59 313.62 312.49 311.87 311.85 311.69 311.52 311.38 311.28 311.37 311.24 313.46 312.34 311.78 311.75 311.57 311.52 311.28 311.25 311.29 311.18 314.47 67B 67C
13B84B 69A 84C 84B 90B 04A 69A 02A 84C 90B 02A 04A 90B 02A 90B 13B 67B 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 1
23 24 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 22 R=12' R=10' R=15' R=15' R=12' R=10' R=25' R=24' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=44' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=44' R=10' R=10'
R=10' R=10' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=14' R=15' R=7.5' R=113' R=87' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=6' R=6' R=10' R=40' R=20' R=40' R=40'
R=40'R=40' R=45' R=45' R=40' R=40' EYE 2 EYE 5 EYE 1 EYE 3 EYE 4 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT.
PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 244 Item a. 07/03/19 ΡΒ≅Κ∆9 ΡΓ∆∆Σ ΕΗΚ∆ Μν− Οκµµδθρ ∆µφηµδδθρ Κµχρβοδ ≅θβγησδβσρ Κµχ Ρτθυδξνθρ
Τθαµ+ Κσχ− ϖϖϖ−τθαµ,κσχ−βνλ Σδκ− 6/2−531−7/7/ ≅µµµχκδ+ Υηθφηµη 11//2 6601 Κησσκδ Θηυδθ Στθµοηϕδ TM ΟΚ≅Μ Χ≅Σ∆ No.DATEDESCRIPTION Θ∆ΥΗΡΗΝΜΡ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΥΗΚΚ≅Φ∆ ΣΝςΜ ΝΕ Κ∆∆ΡΑΤΘΦ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅
ΨΟ,130/ ΨΝΜΗΜΦ Λ≅Ο ≅Λ∆ΜΧΛ∆ΜΣ Ε ∆ Μ Η Φ Μν−/11/37 Χ≅ΥΗΧ Σ− Λβ∆ΚΓ≅Μ∆Ξ Γ Ν ς Μ Ν Λ Λ Κ ≅ Σ ∆ Β Ο Θ Ν Μ Η Υ Ε Ν Η Θ Φ Η Θ ≅ ∆ ∆ ≅ Ρ Ν Μ Η Ρ ∆ Μ Κ 10/27/2021 07/03/19FIRST SUBMISSION 1 02/27/20
02/27/20SECOND SUBMISSION 2 09/25/20 09/25/20THIRD SUBMISSION 3 03/12/21 03/12/21FOURTH SUBMISSION 4 06/29/21 06/29/21FIFTH SUBMISSION 5 10/27/21FINAL PLANNING COMMISSION SET 6 10/27/21
ΡςΛ ΒΝΛΟΤΣ≅ΣΗΝΜΡ Β0/,/2 Μ.≅ {ALLOWABLE FLOWS: 1-YR PER 9VAC25-870-66.B.3(a)} - OUTFALL #1 Q(DEVELOPED) < 0.8[Q(PRE-DEVELOPED)*RV(PRE-DEVELOPED)] / RV(DEVELOPED) Q(DEVELOPED) < 0.8[28.17
X 2.136] / 2.604 = 18.49 CFS *BECAUSE THERE IS OFFSITE DRAINAGE DRAINING TO THE FACILITY IN THE POST-DEVELOPMENT CONDITION, THE Q FROM THE OFFSITE AREA HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE ALLOWABLE
FLOW FROM THE SITE. THEREFORE, THE ALLOWABLE FLOW FOR OUTFALL #1 IS 18.49 CFS + 40.14 CFS. Q(DEVELOPED) < 58.63 CFS { 10-YR PER 9VAC25-870-66.C.2(b) - OUTFALL #1 }Q(DEVELOPED) < Q(PRE-DEVELOPED)
Q(DEVELOPED) < 151.88 CFS {25-YR PER DCSM 5-341.1.B(1) - OUTFALL #1 }Q(DEVELOPED) < Q(PRE-DEVELOPED) Q(DEVELOPED) < 200.05 CFS {\Fsimplex|c0;PRE-DEVELOPMENT & POST-DEVELOPMENT (UNCONTROLLED)
FOR 1-YEAR ONLY FOR ENERGY BALANCE COMPUTATIONS} {\Fsimplex|c0;PRE-DEVELOPMENT FOR 10 & 25-YEAR STORMS FOR ALLOWABLE RELEASE RATES} {\Fcomplex|c0;\H1.8x;\LPOST-DEVELOPMENT PONDPACK
RESULTS:\H0.55556x; } {\Fcomplex|c0;\H1.8x;\LWATER QUANTITY COMPLIANCE SUMMARY TABLE} \pxqc;{\Fcomplex|c0;\H1.8x;\LPRE-DEVELOPMENT PONDPACK SCHEMATIC\l:} \pxqc;{\Fcomplex|c0;\H1.8x;\LPOST-DEVELOPMEN
T PONDPACK SCHEMATIC\l:} {\Fcomplex|c0;\H1.8x;\LSTORAGE-DISCHARGE TABLE} NOTE: ALL STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND WATER QUALITY CONTROLS AND COMPUTATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE CONCEPTUAL AND SUBJECT
TO FINAL ENGINEERING/SITE PLAN. PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE FINAL SITE PLAN FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, THE APPLICANT WILL VERIFY THAT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
FOR STORM WATER QUALITY FOR THE SITE ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL TOWN AND STATE CRITERIA INCLUDING THE TOWN OF LEESBURG STORM WATER MASTER PLAN CRITERIA, THE LATEST VERSIONS OF THE
VIRGINIA STORM WATER MANAGEMENT HANDBOOK, AND THE TOWN'S DCSM, WHICHEVER IS MORE RESTRICTIVE AT TIME OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL. 245 Item a. 07/03/19 ΡΒ≅Κ∆9 ΡΓ∆∆Σ ΕΗΚ∆ Μν− Οκµµδθρ ∆µφηµδδθρ
Κµχρβοδ ≅θβγησδβσρ Κµχ Ρτθυδξνθρ Τθαµ+ Κσχ− ϖϖϖ−τθαµ,κσχ−βνλ Σδκ− 6/2−531−7/7/ ≅µµµχκδ+ Υηθφηµη 11//2 6601 Κησσκδ Θηυδθ Στθµοηϕδ TM ΟΚ≅Μ Χ≅Σ∆ No.DATEDESCRIPTION Θ∆ΥΗΡΗΝΜΡ
ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΥΗΚΚ≅Φ∆ ΣΝςΜ ΝΕ Κ∆∆ΡΑΤΘΦ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΨΟ,130/ ΨΝΜΗΜΦ Λ≅Ο ≅Λ∆ΜΧΛ∆ΜΣ Ε ∆ Μ Η Φ Μν−/11/37 Χ≅ΥΗΧ Σ− Λβ∆ΚΓ≅Μ∆Ξ Γ Ν ς Μ Ν Λ Λ Κ ≅ Σ ∆ Β Ο Θ Ν Μ Η Υ Ε Ν Η Θ Φ Η Θ ≅ ∆ ∆ ≅ Ρ Ν Μ Η Ρ ∆
Μ Κ 10/27/2021 07/03/19FIRST SUBMISSION 1 02/27/20 02/27/20SECOND SUBMISSION 2 09/25/20 09/25/20THIRD SUBMISSION 3 03/12/21 03/12/21FOURTH SUBMISSION 4 06/29/21 06/29/21FIFTH SUBMISSION
5 10/27/21FINAL PLANNING COMMISSION SET 6 10/27/21 ΨΝΜΗΜΦ ΛΝΧΗΕΗΒ≅ΣΗΝΜΡ Α≅Ρ∆ Β00,/0 Μ.≅ %%UZONING MODIFICATIONS SEE SHEET C11-02 FOR LOCATION MAP OF PROPOSED ZONING MODIFICATIONS WHERE
APPLICABLE. 23. SEC. 7.10.6.I THE APPLICANT REQUESTS A MODIFICATION TO PERMIT RESIDENTIAL USES ON THE GROUND FLOOR FOR BUILDINGS A AND E. 25. SEC. 7.10.6.I.3 THE APPLICANT
REQUESTS A MODIFICATION TO PERMIT RESIDENTIAL GROUND FLOOR FOR MIXED USE BUILDINGS TO HAVE A MINIMUM 12 FEET HEIGHT, FLOOR TO FLOOR. 26. SEC. 7.10.6.L THE APPLICANT REQUESTS
A MODIFICATION TO PERMIT PARKING STRUCTURES INTERIOR OF A BLOCK TO NOT HAVE A MINIMUM SURROUNDING BUILDING DEPTH. 27. SEC. 7.10.7.B.5 THE APPLICANT REQUESTS A MODIFICATION
TO ALLOW FOR INTERNAL ILLUMINATION OF AWNINGS IN OUTDOOR DINING AREAS. 28. SEC. 7.10.8.A.1 THE APPLICANT REQUESTS MODIFICATION OF THE NUMBER OF STORIES TO PERMIT UP TO 6 FOR BUILDING
E. BUILDING E WILL REMAIN UNDER 70 FEET IN HEIGHT. THE APPLICANT REQUESTS A MODIFICATION TO PERMIT BUILDING F TO BE ONE-STORY. 29. SEC. 7.10.8.E THE APPLICANT REQUESTS A
MODIFICATION TO PERMIT A REDUCED SETBACK TO NO LESS THAN 25 FEET. 30. SEC. 7.10.8.F THE APPLICANT REQUESTS A MODIFICATION TO PERMIT BUILDING F TO BE ONE-STORY. 31. REMOVED.
32. SEC. 7.10.9.H.2.C THE APPLICANT REQUESTS A MODIFICATION TO ALLOW FOR A MAXIMUM DENSITY GREATER THAN 24 UNITS PER ACRE. 33. REMOVED. 34. SEC. 7.10.9.H.2.E THE APPLICANT REQUESTS
A MODIFICATION TO ALLOW FOR A MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT OF 6 STORIES. 35. SEC. 7.10.10.A.2.a THE APPLICANT REQUESTS A MODIFICATION TO PERMIT RESIDENTIAL USES GREATER THAN 40%%% OF
THE GFA FOR THE DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE CD-CC SUB-DISTRICT. 36. REMOVED. 37. SEC. 7.10.11.A.2.a THE APPLICANT REQUESTS MODIFICATION TO PERMIT THE STREETSCAPE CROSS-SECTION
OF CATOCTIN CIRCLE (AS SHOWN ON SHEETS L2-02 38. SEC. 7.10.11.A.2.c THE APPLICANT REQUESTS MODIFICATION TO PERMIT THE STREETSCAPE CROSS-SECTION (AS SHOWN ON SHEETS L2-02 THROUGH
04) FOR PURPOSES OF ENHANCING THE PEDESTRIAN MOVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH 7.10.11.A.4.b.iii THESE PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH ZONING ORDINANCE AMMENDMENT TLOA-2019-0003
APPROVED BY TOWN COUNCIL ON JUNE 11, 2019. * * * * 1. SEC. 7.10.3.A.1.i THE APPLICANT REQUESTS MODIFICATION OF THE NUMBER OF STORIES TO PERMIT UP TO 6 FOR BUILDING E. BUILDING
E WILL REMAIN UNDER 70 FEET IN HEIGHT. 2. REMOVED. 3. REMOVED. 4. SEC. 7.10.3.B.1.e THE APPLICANT REQUESTS MODIFICATION OF THE NUMBER OF STORIES TO PERMIT UP TO 6 FOR
BUILDING E. BUILDING E WILL REMAIN UNDER 70 FEET IN HEIGHT. 5. REMOVED. 6. SEC. 7.10.3.B.2 THE APPLICANT REQUESTS A MODIFICATION TO PERMIT BUILDING F TO BE ONE-STORY.
7. SEC. 7.10.4.A THE APPLICANT REQUESTS A MODIFICATION TO MATCH THOSE SITING SPECIFICATIONS AS SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE STREET SECTIONS (SEE SHEETS L2-02 through 04). 8.
SEC. 7.10.4.C.1 REMOVED. ORDINANCE AMENDMENT WILL ADDRESS ISSUE. 9. REMOVED. 10. REMOVED. 11. SEC. 7.10.5.B THE APPLICANT REQUESTS MODIFICATION TO PERMIT SOME REQUIRED
BIKE PARKING IN THE STREETSCAPE AREAS. 12. REMOVED. 13. SEC. 7.10.5.D.2.a THE APPLICANT REQUESTS MODIFICATION TO ALLOW FOR BUFFERS LESS THAN 20 FEET AS SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN
(SEE SHEET L4-12) 14. SEC. 7.10.5.G.6.e THE APPLICANT REQUESTS MODIFICATION TO PERMIT LESS THAN 50%%% CANOPY COVERAGE. 15. REMOVED. 16. SEC. 7.10.6.E.2.b.i THE APPLICANT
REQUESTS A MODIFICATION TO ALLOW CORNICES TO EXTEND BEYOND 12 INCHES, UP TO 36 INCHES WITH APPROPRIATE 17. SEC. 7.10.6.F.2 THE APPLICANT REQUESTS A MODIFICATION TO NOT PROVIDE
MAIN ENTRANCES AT THE CORNERS OF BUILDINGS D & E DUE TO TOPOGRAPHICAL CONSTRAINTS. 18. REMOVED. 19. REMOVED. 20. SEC. 7.10.6.G.7.c THE APPLICANT REQUESTS A MODIFICATION
TO ELIMINATE THE MINIMUM DORMER WINDOW REQUIREMENT. 42. REMOVED. 21. SEC. 7.10.6.H.6.b THE APPLICANT REQUESTS TO PERMIT BUILDINGS A, E, AND F TO HAVE GROUND LEVEL TRANSPARENCY
AS SHOWN ON THE ELEVATIONS ON SHEETS A2-01, A2-02, A3-01, A4-01, A6-01, A6-02, AND A7-01 RESPECTIVELY. 22. SEC. 7.10.6.H.6.e THE APPLICANT REQUESTS TO PERMIT BUILDINGS B AND C TO
HAVE UPPER LEVEL TRANSPARENCY, AS SHOWN ON THE ELEVATIONS ON SHEETS A3-01 AND 4-01, RESPECTIVELY, OF THE CONCEPT PLAN. 24. SEC. 7.10.6.I.2 THE APPLICANT REQUESTS A MODIFICATION
TO PERMIT BUILDINGS A AND E TO HAVE UPPER LEVEL TRANSPARENCY AS SHOWN ON THE ELEVATIONS ON SHEETS A2-01, A2-02, A6-01, A6-02, RESPECTIVELY, OF THE CONCEPT PLAN. 40. SEC. 7.10.6.G.4
THE APPLICANT REQUESTS A MODIFICATION TO PERMIT BUILDINGS D & E, THE TOWNHOMES AND STACKED TOWNHOMES TO HAVE TRANSPARENCY AS SHOWN ON THE ELEVATIONS ON SHEETS A1-01, A1-02, A1-03,
AND A1-04 OF THE CONCEPT PLAN. 41. SEC. 7.10.6.H.6.a THE APPLICANT REQUESTS A MODIFICATION TO PERMIT BUILDINGS B AND C TO HAVE GROUND LEVEL TRANSPARENCY AS SHOWN ON THE ELEVATIONS
ON SHEETS A2-01, A2-02, A3-01, A4-01, A6-01, A6-02, AND A7-01 RESPECTIVELY. 43. REMOVED. 44. SEC. 14.2.2.B THE APPLICANT REQUESTS MODIFICATION TO REDUCE THE TOWN BRANCH CREEK VALLEY
BUFFER TO BE LESS THAN 50 FEET. 45. SEC. 11.9 THE APPLICANT REQUESTS MODIFICATION TO COMPUTE THE REQUIRED LOADING SPACES ON A SITE-WIDE BASIS, TOTALING THE RETAIL AND OFFICE
GFA BEFORE APPLYING THE REQUIRED LOADING SPACE RATE, RATHER THAN COMPUTING THE REQUIRED LOADING SPACES ON A BUILDING-BY-BUILDING BASIS. 46. SEC. 7.10.6.H.2 & 3 THE APPLICANT REQUESTS
MODIFICATION OF THE RETAIL ENTRANCE SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS FOR STOREFRONT BUILDINGS FROM ONE PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCE EVERY 24 FEET OF BUILDING FRONTAGE TO A MINIMUM OF ONE PEDESTRIAN
ENTRANCE EVERY 50 FEET OF BUILDING FRONTAGE. PROPORTION. THROUGH 04) 47. SEC. 7.10.5.f THE APPLICANT REQUESTS MODIFICATION TO USE THE B-1 PARKING RATIOS FOR MULTI-FAMILY.
48. SEC. 7.10.7.C.1.b.ii THE APPLICANT REQUESTS MODIFICATION TO PERMIT THE FACADE OF BUILDING A TO PROJECT UP TO 45%%% INTO THE 4-FOOT PROJECTION ZONE AND THE FACADE OF BUILDING
D TO PROJECT UP TO 60%%% INTO THE 4-FOOT PROJECTION ZONE. 246 Item a. 07/03/19 ΡΒ≅Κ∆9 ΡΓ∆∆Σ ΕΗΚ∆ Μν− Οκµµδθρ ∆µφηµδδθρ Κµχρβοδ ≅θβγησδβσρ Κµχ Ρτθυδξνθρ Τθαµ+ Κσχ− ϖϖϖ−τθαµ,κσχ−βνλ
Σδκ− 6/2−531−7/7/ ≅µµµχκδ+ Υηθφηµη 11//2 6601 Κησσκδ Θηυδθ Στθµοηϕδ TM ΟΚ≅Μ Χ≅Σ∆ No.DATEDESCRIPTION Θ∆ΥΗΡΗΝΜΡ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΥΗΚΚ≅Φ∆ ΣΝςΜ ΝΕ Κ∆∆ΡΑΤΘΦ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΨΟ,130/ ΨΝΜΗΜΦ Λ≅Ο ≅Λ∆ΜΧΛ∆ΜΣ
Ε ∆ Μ Η Φ Μν−/11/37 Χ≅ΥΗΧ Σ− Λβ∆ΚΓ≅Μ∆Ξ Γ Ν ς Μ Ν Λ Λ Κ ≅ Σ ∆ Β Ο Θ Ν Μ Η Υ Ε Ν Η Θ Φ Η Θ ≅ ∆ ∆ ≅ Ρ Ν Μ Η Ρ ∆ Μ Κ 10/27/2021 07/03/19FIRST SUBMISSION 1 02/27/20 02/27/20SECOND SUBMISSION
2 09/25/20 09/25/20THIRD SUBMISSION 3 03/12/21 03/12/21FOURTH SUBMISSION 4 06/29/21 06/29/21FIFTH SUBMISSION 5 10/27/21FINAL PLANNING COMMISSION SET 6 10/27/21 ΨΝΜΗΜΦ ΛΝΧΗΕΗΒ≅ΣΗΝΜΡ
ΚΝΒ≅ΣΗΝΜ Λ≅Ο Α≅Ρ∆ Β00,/1 0&<5/& N VA. STATE GRID NORTH 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE060 60 120 60 24030 THE LOCATION OF REQUESTED ZONING MODIFICATIONS IS SHOWN BY NUMBERS
WHICH RELATE TO THE ZMOD NUMBERS ON SHEET C11-01. CERTAIN ZONING MODIFICATIONS WILL APPLY TO THE ENTIRE SUBJECT PROPERTY OR MULTIPLE LOCATIONS AND ARE NOT DEPICTED. NOTE: FAIRFAX STREET
SE CATOCTIN CIRCLE SE HARRISON STREET SE CATOCTIN CIRCLE (EX. 70' R.O.W.) (EX. 70' R.O.W.) (EX. 70' R.O.W.) (EX. 50' R.O.W.) MADISON COURT S KING STREET FAIRFAX STREET SE (URBAN BOULEVARD)
(URBAN BOULEVARD) 311.83 312.42 312.26 312.59312.64 312.89 312.09 311.88 311.63 311.99 311.72 311.76 311.48311.62 311.50 310.91 310.25310.97 314.59 313.62 312.49 311.87 311.85 311.69
311.52 311.38 311.28 311.37 311.24 313.46 312.34 311.78 311.75 311.57 311.52 311.28 311.25 311.29 311.18 314.47 FAIRFAX ST SE (GENERAL STREET) HIGH STREET (PRIVATE GENERAL STREET) PRIVATE
ROAD 'B' PRIVATE ROAD 'C' MADISON COURT PRIVATE ROAD 'A' ONE WAY MADISON COURT ONE WAY MADISON COURT PRIVATE ROAD 'D' (RESIDENTIAL) (RESIDENTIAL) (PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL) (PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL)
(RESIDENTIAL) (RESIDENTIAL) (PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL) (RESIDENTIAL) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 1 23 24
44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 22 EYE 2 EYE 5 EYE 1 EYE 3 EYE 4 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION
ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 2929 23 25 30 26 25 26 1 23 34 4 25 28 20 20 16 41 22 16 26 24 6 16 16 24 40 17 22 16 41 16 17 29 13 21 21 13
11 11 11 28 40 40 20 40 20 40 20 40 20 40 20 40 20 40 20 40 20 40 20 40 29 BUILDING F BUILDING E BUILDING D BUILDING C BUILDING B BUILDING A 11 11 11 44 38 38 37 38 21 40 48 48 247
Item a. 07/03/19 ΡΒ≅Κ∆9 ΡΓ∆∆Σ ΕΗΚ∆ Μν− Οκµµδθρ ∆µφηµδδθρ Κµχρβοδ ≅θβγησδβσρ Κµχ Ρτθυδξνθρ Τθαµ+ Κσχ− ϖϖϖ−τθαµ,κσχ−βνλ Σδκ− 6/2−531−7/7/ ≅µµµχκδ+ Υηθφηµη 11//2 6601 Κησσκδ
Θηυδθ Στθµοηϕδ TM ΟΚ≅Μ Χ≅Σ∆ No.DATEDESCRIPTION Θ∆ΥΗΡΗΝΜΡ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΥΗΚΚ≅Φ∆ ΣΝςΜ ΝΕ Κ∆∆ΡΑΤΘΦ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΨΟ,130/ ΨΝΜΗΜΦ Λ≅Ο ≅Λ∆ΜΧΛ∆ΜΣ 07/03/19FIRST SUBMISSION 1 02/27/20 02/27/20SECOND SUBMISSION
2 09/25/20 09/25/20THIRD SUBMISSION 3 03/12/21 03/12/21FOURTH SUBMISSION 4 06/29/21 06/29/21FIFTH SUBMISSION 5 10/27/21FINAL PLANNING COMMISSION SET 6 10/27/21 Θ∆ΨΝΜΗΜΦ ΟΚ≅Σ Β01,/0
0! < 7/& 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE080 80 160 80 32040 N VA. STATE GRID NORTH CURVE TABLE NO. C1 C2 C3 DELTA 004°24'30" 000°35'22" 033°54'17" RADIUS 25.00' 1252.77'
1255.00' ARC LENGTH 1.92' 12.89' 742.65' CHORD BEARING S 06°01'30" E S 79°00'25" W N 83°44'45" W CHORD 1.92' 12.89' 731.86' TANGENT 0.96' 6.45' 382.55' %%UZONING & AREA TABULATIONS
TOTAL SITE AREA: 18.48 AC OR 805,115 SF EXISTING CD ZONING DISTRICT AREA: 15.81 AC OR 688,454 SF EXISTING R-22 ZONING DISTRICT AREA, AND SUBJECT TO PROPOSED TOWN PLAN AMENDMENT: 2.67
AC OR 116,661 SF PROPOSED CD-RH ZONING SUB-DISTRICT AREA: 4.84 AC OR 210,838 SF PROPOSED CD-CC ZONING SUB- DISTRICT AREA: 13.64 AC OR 594,277 SF SITE ALSO CONTAINS H-2 OVERLAY DISTRICT,
FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT, AND CREEK VALLEY BUFFER . THE H-2 OVERLAY DISTRICT IS TO BE REMOVED FROM THE SUBJECT SITE WITH THIS APPLICATION. FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT H-2 OVERLAY
DISTRICT CREEK VALLEY BUFFER SUBJECT SITE %%ULEGEND OMM C O AINI H T KEVIN P. O'CONNOR UN L A D S E W N L A O E V R YRF O RIV G Lic. No.1967 7/1/2019 311.83 312.42 312.26 312.59 312.64
312.89 312.09 311.88 311.63 311.99 311.72 311.76 311.48 311.62 311.50 310.91 310.25 310.97 314.59 313.62 312.49 311.87 311.85 311.69 311.52 311.38 311.28 311.37 311.24 313.46 312.34
311.78 311.75 311.57 311.52 311.28 311.25 311.29 311.18 314.47 LINE PER D.B. 708 PG.37 S 66°00'35" E 415.54' N 59°34'51" E 323.58' S 18°54'15" W 349.58' S 71°06'22" E 350.00' S 08°13'41"
E 616.79' N 18°51'56" E 317.27' S 65°44'50" E 62.01' N 24°00'40" E 100.98'N 23°12'07" E 99.83' N 66°47'44" W 128.01' N 23°12'16" E S 66°47'44" E 2.80' N 23°12'16" E 350.00' S 23°12'16"
W 100.00' N 66°47'44" W 100.00' N 23°12'16" E 100.00' N 66°47'44" W 14.80' N 66°47'44" W 233.20'S 89°56'00" W 29.74' N 23°25'29" E 11.77' S 66°47'37" E 11.73' C3 S 10°41'54" E 2.26'
S 72°49'09" W 52.79' S 78°42'25" E 4.92' S 47°54'41" W N 10°52'32" E 7.66' 42.48' C1 S 08°13'41" E 616.79' 60.00' (EX. 50' R.O.W.) MADISON COURT FAIRFAX STREET SE S KING STREET (EX.
70' R.O.W.) CATOCTIN CIRCLE SE CATOCTIN CIRCLE (EX. 70' R.O.W.) HARRISON STREET SE (EX. 70' R.O.W.) C2 S 66°58'38" E 303.90' N 18°54'15" E 230.44' 210,838 SF 4.84 AC 594,277 SF 13.64
AC 805,115 SF 18.48 AC TOTAL AREA PROPOSED ZONING SUB-DISTRICT: CD-RH PROPOSED ZONING SUB-DISTRICT: CD-CC EX. ZONE: R-22 EX. ZONE: CD PROP. ZONING SUB-DISTRICT: CD-RH PROP. ZONING SUB-DISTRICT:
CD-CC S 66°02'04" E 351.15' PROPOSED ZONING DISTRICT: CD S 78°42'55" W 68.72' AREA SUBJECT TO PROPOSED TOWN PLAN AMENDMENT (116,661 SF OR 2.67 AC) H-2 OVERLAY DISTRICT THE H-2 OVERLAY
DISTRICT IS TO BE REMOVED FROM THE SUBJECT SITE WITH THIS APPLICATION. FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT 50' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER 50' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER 100' 150'
CREEK VALLEY BUFFER 248 Item a. 07/03/19 ΡΒ≅Κ∆9 ΡΓ∆∆Σ ΕΗΚ∆ Μν− Οκµµδθρ ∆µφηµδδθρ Κµχρβοδ ≅θβγησδβσρ Κµχ Ρτθυδξνθρ Τθαµ+ Κσχ− ϖϖϖ−τθαµ,κσχ−βνλ Σδκ− 6/2−531−7/7/ ≅µµµχκδ+ Υηθφηµη
11//2 6601 Κησσκδ Θηυδθ Στθµοηϕδ TM ΟΚ≅Μ Χ≅Σ∆ No.DATEDESCRIPTION Θ∆ΥΗΡΗΝΜΡ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΥΗΚΚ≅Φ∆ ΣΝςΜ ΝΕ Κ∆∆ΡΑΤΘΦ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΨΟ,130/ ΨΝΜΗΜΦ Λ≅Ο ≅Λ∆ΜΧΛ∆ΜΣ Ε ∆ Μ Η Φ Μν−/11/37 Χ≅ΥΗΧ Σ− Λβ∆ΚΓ≅Μ∆Ξ
Γ Ν ς Μ Ν Λ Λ Κ ≅ Σ ∆ Β Ο Θ Ν Μ Η Υ Ε Ν Η Θ Φ Η Θ ≅ ∆ ∆ ≅ Ρ Ν Μ Η Ρ ∆ Μ Κ 10/27/2021 07/03/19FIRST SUBMISSION 1 02/27/20 02/27/20SECOND SUBMISSION 2 09/25/20 09/25/20THIRD SUBMISSION
3 03/12/21 03/12/21FOURTH SUBMISSION 4 06/29/21 06/29/21FIFTH SUBMISSION 5 10/27/21FINAL PLANNING COMMISSION SET 6 10/27/21 ΟΓ≅Ρ∆ 0 ΤΣΗΚΗΣΞ ΟΚ≅Μ Β02,/0 0&<5/& 1 inch = ft. ( IN
FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE060 60 120 60 24030 N VA. STATE GRID NORTH F AIR F A X ST RE E TS CATOCTIN CIRCLE SE HARRISON STREET SE CATOCTIN CIRCLE (EX. 70' R.O.W.) (EX. 70' R.O.W.) (EX. 70'
R.O.W.) (EX. 50' R.O.W.) MADISON COURT NO PARKING NO PARKING S KING STREET SAN LAT EX. EP EX. EP EX. SHOULDER (URBAN BOULEVARD) (URBAN BOULEVARD) 311.83 312.42 312.26 312.59312.64 312.89
311.63 311.99 311.72 311.76 311.48311.62 311.50 310.91 310.25310.97 314.59 313.62 312.49 311.87 311.85 311.69 311.52 311.38 311.37 311.24 313.46 312.34 311.78 311.75 311.57 311.52 311.28
311.25 311.29 311.18 314.47 ONLY ONLY HIGH STREET (PRIVATE GENERAL STREET) PRIVATE ROAD 'B' PRIVATE ROAD 'C' MADISON COURT PRIVATE ROAD 'A' ONE WAY MADISON COURT ONE WAY MADISON COURT
PRIVATE ROAD 'D' (RESIDENTIAL) (RESIDENTIAL) (PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL) (PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL) (RESIDENTIAL) (RESIDENTIAL) (PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL) (RESIDENTIAL) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 1 23 24 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 22 PROP. SAN. SEW. PROP. SAN. SEW. PROP. SAN. SEW. PROP. SAN.
SEW. PROP. SAN. SEW. PROP. SAN. SEW. PROP. SAN. SEW. PROP. SAN. SEW. PROP. SAN. SEW. PROP. SAN. SEW. PRIV. SAN. LAT. PRIV. SAN. LAT. R=12'R=10' R=15' R=15' R=12' R=10' R=25' R=24' R=15'
R=15' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=44' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=44' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=15' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=10'
R=45'R=45' R=40' R=40' EYE 2 EYE 1 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE LOADING ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE BUILDING A EXISTING WATER SERVICE
TO RITE AID FROM EX. W/M IN CATOCTIN CIRCLE TO BE MAINTAINED. EXISTING WATER SERVICE TO RILEY PROPERTY FROM EX. W/M IN CATOCTIN CIRCLE TO BE MAINTAINED \pxqr;EXISTING WATER SERVICE
AND SAN. LATERAL TO MILLER PROPERTY TO BE RECONNECTED EX. PIPES ARE TO REMAIN FOR PHASE 1 ONLY, BEFORE BUILDING B, OURS OVERLOOK, OR ANY OTHER CONFLICTING SITE FEATURES ARE CONSTRUCTED
DURING PHASE 2. STORM SEWER FLOW IS TO BE REROUTED TO FAIRFAX STREET IN THE UTLIMATE CONDITIONS (SEE SHEETS C6-01 THROUGH C6-03) EXISTING PARKING TO REMAIN DURING PHASE 1 CONSTRUCTION
249 Item a. 07/03/19 ΡΒ≅Κ∆9 ΡΓ∆∆Σ ΕΗΚ∆ Μν− Οκµµδθρ ∆µφηµδδθρ Κµχρβοδ ≅θβγησδβσρ Κµχ Ρτθυδξνθρ Τθαµ+ Κσχ− ϖϖϖ−τθαµ,κσχ−βνλ Σδκ− 6/2−531−7/7/ ≅µµµχκδ+ Υηθφηµη 11//2 6601 Κησσκδ
Θηυδθ Στθµοηϕδ TM ΟΚ≅Μ Χ≅Σ∆ No.DATEDESCRIPTION Θ∆ΥΗΡΗΝΜΡ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΥΗΚΚ≅Φ∆ ΣΝςΜ ΝΕ Κ∆∆ΡΑΤΘΦ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΨΟ,130/ ΨΝΜΗΜΦ Λ≅Ο ≅Λ∆ΜΧΛ∆ΜΣ Ε ∆ Μ Η Φ Μν−/11/37 Χ≅ΥΗΧ Σ− Λβ∆ΚΓ≅Μ∆Ξ Γ Ν ς Μ Ν Λ Λ
Κ ≅ Σ ∆ Β Ο Θ Ν Μ Η Υ Ε Ν Η Θ Φ Η Θ ≅ ∆ ∆ ≅ Ρ Ν Μ Η Ρ ∆ Μ Κ 10/27/2021 07/03/19FIRST SUBMISSION 1 02/27/20 02/27/20SECOND SUBMISSION 2 09/25/20 09/25/20THIRD SUBMISSION 3 03/12/21 03/12/21FOURTH
SUBMISSION 4 06/29/21 06/29/21FIFTH SUBMISSION 5 10/27/21FINAL PLANNING COMMISSION SET 6 10/27/21 ΟΓ≅Ρ∆ 1 ΗΜΕΘ≅ΡΣΘΤΒΣΤΘ∆ ΟΚ≅Μ Β02,/0≅ 0&<5/& 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE060
60 120 60 24030 N VA. STATE GRID NORTH FAIRFAX ST SE BUILDING A ONLY ONLY HIGH STREET PRIVATE ROAD 'B' PRIVATE ROAD 'C' MADISON COURT PRIVATE ROAD 'A' ONE WAY MADISON COURT ONE WAY
MADISON COURT PRIVATE ROAD 'D' (RESIDENTIAL) FAIRFAX STREET SE CATOCTIN CIRCLE SE HARRISON STREET SE MADISON COURT S KING STREET EX. EP EX. EP EX. SHOULDER \pxqc;APPROX. LOC. EX. 6"
W/M CATOCTIN CIRCLE SE UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE DESTINY CHURCH WALGREENS BARBER SHOP CAR DEALER MADISON HOUSE APARTMENTS APPROX. SIZE AND LOCATION OF TEMPORARY LAYDOWN AREA TEMPORARY
PARK ±7,500 SF TEMPORARY STORM OUTFALL UNTIL PERMANENT WALL IS CONSTRUCTED \pxqc;{\H1.4x;COMMON GREEN} PAD TO BE GRADED FOR BUILDING E 2" BLOW OFF VALE APPROXIMATE EDGE OF TOWN BRANCH
OPEN SPACE APPROX. SIZE AND LOCATION OF TEMPORARY LAYDOWN AREA 250 Item a. 07/03/19 ΡΒ≅Κ∆9 ΡΓ∆∆Σ ΕΗΚ∆ Μν− Οκµµδθρ ∆µφηµδδθρ Κµχρβοδ ≅θβγησδβσρ Κµχ Ρτθυδξνθρ Τθαµ+ Κσχ− ϖϖϖ−τθαµ,κσχ−βνλ
Σδκ− 6/2−531−7/7/ ≅µµµχκδ+ Υηθφηµη 11//2 6601 Κησσκδ Θηυδθ Στθµοηϕδ TM ΟΚ≅Μ Χ≅Σ∆ No.DATEDESCRIPTION Θ∆ΥΗΡΗΝΜΡ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΥΗΚΚ≅Φ∆ ΣΝςΜ ΝΕ Κ∆∆ΡΑΤΘΦ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΨΟ,130/ ΨΝΜΗΜΦ Λ≅Ο ≅Λ∆ΜΧΛ∆ΜΣ
Ε ∆ Μ Η Φ Μν−/11/37 Χ≅ΥΗΧ Σ− Λβ∆ΚΓ≅Μ∆Ξ Γ Ν ς Μ Ν Λ Λ Κ ≅ Σ ∆ Β Ο Θ Ν Μ Η Υ Ε Ν Η Θ Φ Η Θ ≅ ∆ ∆ ≅ Ρ Ν Μ Η Ρ ∆ Μ Κ 10/27/2021 07/03/19FIRST SUBMISSION 1 02/27/20 02/27/20SECOND SUBMISSION
2 09/25/20 09/25/20THIRD SUBMISSION 3 03/12/21 03/12/21FOURTH SUBMISSION 4 06/29/21 06/29/21FIFTH SUBMISSION 5 10/27/21FINAL PLANNING COMMISSION SET 6 10/27/21 ΟΓ≅ΡΗΜΦ ΟΚ≅Μ Β02,/1 0&<5/&
1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE060 60 120 60 24030 N VA. STATE GRID NORTH FAIRFAX ST SE BUILDING F EX. ENTRANCE TO REMAIN (TO REMAIN) TO REMAIN EX. BUILDING GARAGE ENTRANCE
LOADING ENTRANCE LOADING ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE LOADING ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE LOADING ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE BUILDING E BUILDING
D BUILDING C BUILDING B BUILDING A LOADING ENTRANCE ONLY ONLY ONLY ONLY ONLY ONLY (1 LOADING SPACE AT 15'X30') (1 LOADING SPACE AT 15'X30') (1 LOADING SPACE AT 15'X30') (2 LOADING SPACES
- 15'X30' AND 12'X30') (2 LOADING SPACES - 15'X30' AND 12'X30') (GENERAL STREET) (NON-RESIDENTIAL) HIGH STREET (PRIVATE GENERAL STREET) PRIVATE ROAD 'B' PRIVATE ROAD 'C' MADISON COURT
PRIVATE ROAD 'A' ONE WAY MADISON COURT ONE WAY MADISON COURT PRIVATE ROAD 'D' (RESIDENTIAL) (RESIDENTIAL) (PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL) (PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL) (RESIDENTIAL) (RESIDENTIAL) (PRIVATE
RESIDENTIAL) (RESIDENTIAL) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 1 23 24 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 22 GAR=
321.13 FF=231.46 GAR= 319.82 FF=320.40 GAR= 321.86 FF=323.61 GAR= 321.86 FF=323.61 GAR= 321.36 FF=323.11 GAR= 320.40 FF=321.11 GAR= 329.96 FF=331.71 GAR= 327.20 FF=328.36 GAR= 326.29
FF=326.87 GAR= 323.86 FF=324.19 GAR= 329.26 FF=329.80 GAR= 325.50 FF=326.04 GAR= 323.31 FF=324.03 GAR= 326.54 FF=327.12 GAR= 323.90 FF=325.10 GAR= 328.60 FF=329.80 GAR= 324.20 FF=324.50
GAR= 328.20 FF=328.60 GAR= 319.80 FF=320.80 GAR= 323.50 FF=323.80 GAR= 321.13 FF=221.46 GAR= 320.74 FF=221.07 (2R) R=12'R=10' R=15' R=15' R=12' R=10' R=25' R=24' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=15'
R=15' R=15' R=44' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=44' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=14' R=15' R=7.5' R=113' R=87'
R=10' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=6' R=6' R=10' R=40' R=20' R=40' R=40' R=40' R=40'R=45'R=45' R=40' R=40' EYE 2 EYE 5 EYE 1 EYE 3 EYE 4 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE
4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE F AIR F AX S TREETS CATOCTIN
CIRCLE SE HARRISON STREET SE CATOCTIN CIRCLE (EX. 70' R.O.W.) (EX. 70' R.O.W.) (EX. 70' R.O.W.) (EX. 50' R.O.W.) MADISON COURT S KING STREET SAN LAT EX. EP EX. EP EX. SHOULDER (URBAN
BOULEVARD) (URBAN BOULEVARD) 311.83 312.42 312.26 312.59312.64 312.89 311.63 311.99 311.72 311.76 311.48311.62 311.50 310.91 310.25310.97 314.59 313.62 312.49 311.87 311.85 311.69 311.52
311.38 311.37 311.24 313.46 312.34 311.78 311.75 311.57 311.52 311.28 311.25 311.29 311.18 314.47 PHASE LINE PHASE 1 EX. BUILDING PHASE 2A PHASE LINE PHASE LINE PHASE 2C PHASE 2B PHASE
LINE PHASE LINE 251 Item a. 07/03/19 ΡΒ≅Κ∆9 ΡΓ∆∆Σ ΕΗΚ∆ Μν− Οκµµδθρ ∆µφηµδδθρ Κµχρβοδ ≅θβγησδβσρ Κµχ Ρτθυδξνθρ Τθαµ+ Κσχ− ϖϖϖ−τθαµ,κσχ−βνλ Σδκ− 6/2−531−7/7/ ≅µµµχκδ+ Υηθφηµη
11//2 6601 Κησσκδ Θηυδθ Στθµοηϕδ TM ΟΚ≅Μ Χ≅Σ∆ No.DATEDESCRIPTION Θ∆ΥΗΡΗΝΜΡ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΥΗΚΚ≅Φ∆ ΣΝςΜ ΝΕ Κ∆∆ΡΑΤΘΦ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΨΟ,130/ ΨΝΜΗΜΦ Λ≅Ο ≅Λ∆ΜΧΛ∆ΜΣ Ε ∆ Μ Η Φ Μν−/11/37 Χ≅ΥΗΧ Σ− Λβ∆ΚΓ≅Μ∆Ξ
Γ Ν ς Μ Ν Λ Λ Κ ≅ Σ ∆ Β Ο Θ Ν Μ Η Υ Ε Ν Η Θ Φ Η Θ ≅ ∆ ∆ ≅ Ρ Ν Μ Η Ρ ∆ Μ Κ 10/27/2021 07/03/19FIRST SUBMISSION 1 02/27/20 02/27/20SECOND SUBMISSION 2 09/25/20 09/25/20THIRD SUBMISSION
3 03/12/21 03/12/21FOURTH SUBMISSION 4 06/29/21 06/29/21FIFTH SUBMISSION 5 10/27/21FINAL PLANNING COMMISSION SET 6 10/27/21 ΡΤ,3/ ΣΤΘΜΗΜΦ ΛΝΥ∆Λ∆ΜΣ ΟΚ≅Μ Β03,/0 0&<4/& 1 inch = ft.
( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE050 50 100 50 20025 N VA. STATE GRID NORTH SU-40 (LOUDOUN COUNTY FIRE TRUCK) %%UVEHICLE SHOWN: 0.9' 0.4' 97.6' EX. EP EX. EP EX. SHOULDER 311.83 312.42 312.26
312.59312.64 312.89 312.09 311.88 311.63 311.99 311.72 311.76 311.48311.62 311.50 310.91 310.25310.97 314.59 313.62 312.49 311.87 311.85 311.69 311.52 311.38 311.28 311.37 311.24 313.46
312.34 311.78 311.75 311.57 311.52 311.28 311.25 311.29 311.18 314.47 BUILDING F EX. ENTRANCE TO REMAIN (TO REMAIN) TO REMAIN EX. BUILDING GARAGE ENTRANCE LOADING ENTRANCE LOADING ENTRANCE
GARAGE ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE LOADING ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE LOADING ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE BUILDING E BUILDING D BUILDING C BUILDING B BUILDING
A LOADING ENTRANCE ONLY ONLY ONLY ONLY ONLY ONLY (1 LOADING SPACE AT 15'X30') (1 LOADING SPACE AT 15'X30') (1 LOADING SPACE AT 15'X30') (2 LOADING SPACES - 15'X30' AND 12'X30') (2 LOADING
SPACES - 15'X30' AND 12'X30') (NON-RESIDENTIAL) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 1 23 24 44 45 46 47 48 49
50 51 52 53 22 GAR= 321.13 FF=231.46 GAR= 319.82 FF=320.40 GAR= 321.86 FF=323.61 GAR= 321.86 FF=323.61 GAR= 321.36 FF=323.11 GAR= 320.40 FF=321.11 GAR= 329.96 FF=331.71 GAR= 327.20
FF=328.36 GAR= 326.29 FF=326.87 GAR= 323.86 FF=324.19 GAR= 329.26 FF=329.80 GAR= 325.50 FF=326.04 GAR= 323.31 FF=324.03 GAR= 326.54 FF=327.12 GAR= 323.90 FF=325.10 GAR= 328.60 FF=329.80
GAR= 324.20 FF=324.50 GAR= 328.20 FF=328.60 GAR= 319.80 FF=320.80 GAR= 323.50 FF=323.80 GAR= 321.13 FF=221.46 GAR= 320.74 FF=221.07 (2R) R=12'R=10' R=15' R=15' R=12' R=10' R=25' R=24'
R=15' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=44' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=44' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=14' R=15'
R=7.5' R=113' R=87' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=6' R=6' R=10' R=40' R=20' R=40' R=40' R=40' R=40'R=45'R=45' R=40' R=40' EYE 2 EYE 5 EYE 1 EYE 3 EYE 4 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE
4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE SU-40
AASHTO 2011 (US) SU-40 AASHTO 2011 (US) SU-40 AASHTO 2011 (US) SU-40 AASHTO 2011 (US) SU-40 AASHTO 2011 (US) SU-40 AASHTO 2011 (US) SU-40 AASHTO 2011 (US) SU-40 AASHTO 2011 (US) SU-40
AASHTO 2011 (US) SU-40 AASHTO 2011 (US) SU-40 AASHTO 2011 (US) SU-40 AASHTO 2011 (US) SU-40 AASHTO 2011 (US) SU-40 AASHTO 2011 (US) 252 Item a. 07/03/19 ΡΒ≅Κ∆9 ΡΓ∆∆Σ ΕΗΚ∆ Μν− Οκµµδθρ
∆µφηµδδθρ Κµχρβοδ ≅θβγησδβσρ Κµχ Ρτθυδξνθρ Τθαµ+ Κσχ− ϖϖϖ−τθαµ,κσχ−βνλ Σδκ− 6/2−531−7/7/ ≅µµµχκδ+ Υηθφηµη 11//2 6601 Κησσκδ Θηυδθ Στθµοηϕδ TM ΟΚ≅Μ Χ≅Σ∆ No.DATEDESCRIPTION
Θ∆ΥΗΡΗΝΜΡ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΥΗΚΚ≅Φ∆ ΣΝςΜ ΝΕ Κ∆∆ΡΑΤΘΦ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΨΟ,130/ ΨΝΜΗΜΦ Λ≅Ο ≅Λ∆ΜΧΛ∆ΜΣ Ε ∆ Μ Η Φ Μν−/11/37 Χ≅ΥΗΧ Σ− Λβ∆ΚΓ≅Μ∆Ξ Γ Ν ς Μ Ν Λ Λ Κ ≅ Σ ∆ Β Ο Θ Ν Μ Η Υ Ε Ν Η Θ Φ Η Θ ≅ ∆ ∆ ≅ Ρ
Ν Μ Η Ρ ∆ Μ Κ 10/27/2021 07/03/19FIRST SUBMISSION 1 02/27/20 02/27/20SECOND SUBMISSION 2 09/25/20 09/25/20THIRD SUBMISSION 3 03/12/21 03/12/21FOURTH SUBMISSION 4 06/29/21 06/29/21FIFTH
SUBMISSION 5 10/27/21FINAL PLANNING COMMISSION SET 6 10/27/21 ΡΤ,3/ ΣΤΘΜΗΜΦ ΛΝΥ∆Λ∆ΜΣ ΟΚ≅Μ Β03,/1 0&<4/& 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE050 50 100 50 20025 N VA. STATE GRID
NORTH SU-40 (LOUDOUN COUNTY FIRE TRUCK) %%UVEHICLE SHOWN: 0.9' 0.4' 97.6' EX. EP EX. EP EX. SHOULDER 311.83 312.42 312.26 312.59312.64 312.89 312.09 311.88 311.63 311.99 311.72 311.76
311.48311.62 311.50 310.91 310.25310.97 314.59 313.62 312.49 311.87 311.85 311.69 311.52 311.38 311.28 311.37 311.24 313.46 312.34 311.78 311.75 311.57 311.52 311.28 311.25 311.29 311.18
314.47 BUILDING F EX. ENTRANCE TO REMAIN (TO REMAIN) TO REMAIN EX. BUILDING GARAGE ENTRANCE LOADING ENTRANCE LOADING ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE LOADING ENTRANCE GARAGE
ENTRANCE LOADING ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE BUILDING E BUILDING D BUILDING C BUILDING B BUILDING A LOADING ENTRANCE ONLY ONLY ONLY ONLY ONLY ONLY (1 LOADING
SPACE AT 15'X30') (1 LOADING SPACE AT 15'X30') (1 LOADING SPACE AT 15'X30') (2 LOADING SPACES - 15'X30' AND 12'X30') (2 LOADING SPACES - 15'X30' AND 12'X30') (NON-RESIDENTIAL) 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 1 23 24 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 22 GAR= 321.13 FF=231.46 GAR= 319.82 FF=320.40
GAR= 321.86 FF=323.61 GAR= 321.86 FF=323.61 GAR= 321.36 FF=323.11 GAR= 320.40 FF=321.11 GAR= 329.96 FF=331.71 GAR= 327.20 FF=328.36 GAR= 326.29 FF=326.87 GAR= 323.86 FF=324.19 GAR=
329.26 FF=329.80 GAR= 325.50 FF=326.04 GAR= 323.31 FF=324.03 GAR= 326.54 FF=327.12 GAR= 323.90 FF=325.10 GAR= 328.60 FF=329.80 GAR= 324.20 FF=324.50 GAR= 328.20 FF=328.60 GAR= 319.80
FF=320.80 GAR= 323.50 FF=323.80 GAR= 321.13 FF=221.46 GAR= 320.74 FF=221.07 (2R) R=12'R=10' R=15' R=15' R=12' R=10' R=25' R=24' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=44' R=20' R=20'
R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=44' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=14' R=15' R=7.5' R=113' R=87' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=10'
R=10' R=6' R=6' R=10' R=40' R=20' R=40' R=40' R=40' R=40'R=45'R=45' R=40' R=40' EYE 2 EYE 5 EYE 1 EYE 3 EYE 4 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT.
PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE SU-40 AASHTO 2011 (US) SU-40 AASHTO 2011 (US) SU-40 AASHTO
2011 (US) SU-40 AASHTO 2011 (US) SU-40 AASHTO 2011 (US) SU-40 AASHTO 2011 (US) SU-40 AASHTO 2011 (US) SU-40 AASHTO 2011 (US) SU-40 AASHTO 2011 (US) SU-40 AASHTO 2011 (US) 253 Item a.
07/03/19 ΡΒ≅Κ∆9 ΡΓ∆∆Σ ΕΗΚ∆ Μν− Οκµµδθρ ∆µφηµδδθρ Κµχρβοδ ≅θβγησδβσρ Κµχ Ρτθυδξνθρ Τθαµ+ Κσχ− ϖϖϖ−τθαµ,κσχ−βνλ Σδκ− 6/2−531−7/7/ ≅µµµχκδ+ Υηθφηµη 11//2 6601 Κησσκδ Θηυδθ
Στθµοηϕδ TM ΟΚ≅Μ Χ≅Σ∆ No.DATEDESCRIPTION Θ∆ΥΗΡΗΝΜΡ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΥΗΚΚ≅Φ∆ ΣΝςΜ ΝΕ Κ∆∆ΡΑΤΘΦ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΨΟ,130/ ΨΝΜΗΜΦ Λ≅Ο ≅Λ∆ΜΧΛ∆ΜΣ Ε ∆ Μ Η Φ Μν−/11/37 Χ≅ΥΗΧ Σ− Λβ∆ΚΓ≅Μ∆Ξ Γ Ν ς Μ Ν Λ Λ Κ ≅ Σ
∆ Β Ο Θ Ν Μ Η Υ Ε Ν Η Θ Φ Η Θ ≅ ∆ ∆ ≅ Ρ Ν Μ Η Ρ ∆ Μ Κ 10/27/2021 07/03/19FIRST SUBMISSION 1 02/27/20 02/27/20SECOND SUBMISSION 2 09/25/20 09/25/20THIRD SUBMISSION 3 03/12/21 03/12/21FOURTH
SUBMISSION 4 06/29/21 06/29/21FIFTH SUBMISSION 5 10/27/21FINAL PLANNING COMMISSION SET 6 10/27/21 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE050 50 100 50 20025 N VA. STATE GRID NORTH
SU-30 (BOX TRUCK) %%UVEHICLE SHOWN: ΡΤ,2/ ΣΤΘΜΗΜΦ ΛΝΥ∆Λ∆ΜΣ ΟΚ≅Μ Β03,/2 0&<4/& SNOW PLOW TURNING MOVEMENT EX. EP EX. EP 311.83 312.42 312.26 312.59312.64 312.89 312.09 311.88 311.63
311.99 311.72 311.76 311.48311.62 311.50 310.91 310.25310.97 314.59 313.62 312.49 311.87 311.85 311.69 311.52 311.38 311.28 311.37 311.24 313.46 312.34 311.78 311.75 311.57 311.52 311.28
311.25 311.29 311.18 314.47 BUILDING F EX. ENTRANCE TO REMAIN (TO REMAIN) TO REMAIN EX. BUILDING GARAGE ENTRANCE LOADING ENTRANCE LOADING ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE LOADING
ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE LOADING ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE BUILDING E BUILDING D BUILDING C BUILDING B BUILDING A LOADING ENTRANCE ONLY ONLY ONLY ONLY
ONLY ONLY (1 LOADING SPACE AT 15'X30') (1 LOADING SPACE AT 15'X30') (1 LOADING SPACE AT 15'X30') (2 LOADING SPACES - 15'X30' AND 12'X30') (2 LOADING SPACES - 15'X30' AND 12'X30') (NON-RESIDENTIAL)
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 1 23 24 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 22 GAR= 321.13 FF=231.46 GAR= 319.82
FF=320.40 GAR= 321.86 FF=323.61 GAR= 321.86 FF=323.61 GAR= 321.36 FF=323.11 GAR= 320.40 FF=321.11 GAR= 329.96 FF=331.71 GAR= 327.20 FF=328.36 GAR= 326.29 FF=326.87 GAR= 323.86 FF=324.19
GAR= 329.26 FF=329.80 GAR= 325.50 FF=326.04 GAR= 323.31 FF=324.03 GAR= 326.54 FF=327.12 GAR= 323.90 FF=325.10 GAR= 328.60 FF=329.80 GAR= 324.20 FF=324.50 GAR= 328.20 FF=328.60 GAR=
319.80 FF=320.80 GAR= 323.50 FF=323.80 GAR= 321.13 FF=221.46 GAR= 320.74 FF=221.07 (2R) R=12'R=10' R=15' R=15' R=12' R=10' R=25' R=24' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=44' R=20'
R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=44' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=14' R=15' R=7.5' R=113' R=87' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=10'
R=10' R=10' R=6' R=6' R=10' R=40' R=20' R=40' R=40' R=40' R=40' R=45'R=45' R=40' R=40' EYE 2 EYE 5 EYE 1 EYE 3 EYE 4 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE
4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE SU-30 AASHTO 2011 (US) SU-30 AASHTO 2011 (US) SU-30
AASHTO 2011 (US) SU-30 AASHTO 2011 (US) SU-30 AASHTO 2011 (US) SU-30 AASHTO 2011 (US) SU-30 AASHTO 2011 (US) SU-30 AASHTO 2011 (US) SU-30 AASHTO 2011 (US) SU-30 AASHTO 2011 (US) SU-30
AASHTO 2011 (US) SU-30 AASHTO 2011 (US) SU-30 AASHTO 2011 (US) SU-30 AASHTO 2011 (US) 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 SU-30 AASHTO 2011 (US) SU-30
AASHTO 2011 (US) SU-30 AASHTO 2011 (US) SU-30 AASHTO 2011 (US) \A1;24.0' \A1;24.0' \A1;24.0' \A1;25.0' \A1;60.0' \A1;60.0' \A1;24.0' R=25' R=25' 254 Item a. 07/03/19 ΡΒ≅Κ∆9 ΡΓ∆∆Σ ΕΗΚ∆
Μν− Οκµµδθρ ∆µφηµδδθρ Κµχρβοδ ≅θβγησδβσρ Κµχ Ρτθυδξνθρ Τθαµ+ Κσχ− ϖϖϖ−τθαµ,κσχ−βνλ Σδκ− 6/2−531−7/7/ ≅µµµχκδ+ Υηθφηµη 11//2 6601 Κησσκδ Θηυδθ Στθµοηϕδ TM ΟΚ≅Μ Χ≅Σ∆ No.DATEDESCRIPTION
Θ∆ΥΗΡΗΝΜΡ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΥΗΚΚ≅Φ∆ ΣΝςΜ ΝΕ Κ∆∆ΡΑΤΘΦ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΨΟ,130/ ΨΝΜΗΜΦ Λ≅Ο ≅Λ∆ΜΧΛ∆ΜΣ Ε ∆ Μ Η Φ Μν−/11/37 Χ≅ΥΗΧ Σ− Λβ∆ΚΓ≅Μ∆Ξ Γ Ν ς Μ Ν Λ Λ Κ ≅ Σ ∆ Β Ο Θ Ν Μ Η Υ Ε Ν Η Θ Φ Η Θ ≅ ∆ ∆ ≅ Ρ
Ν Μ Η Ρ ∆ Μ Κ 10/27/2021 07/03/19FIRST SUBMISSION 1 02/27/20 02/27/20SECOND SUBMISSION 2 09/25/20 09/25/20THIRD SUBMISSION 3 03/12/21 03/12/21FOURTH SUBMISSION 4 06/29/21 06/29/21FIFTH
SUBMISSION 5 10/27/21FINAL PLANNING COMMISSION SET 6 10/27/21 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE050 50 100 50 20025 N VA. STATE GRID NORTH SU-30 (BOX TRUCK) %%UVEHICLE SHOWN:
ΡΤ,2/ ΣΤΘΜΗΜΦ ΛΝΥ∆Λ∆ΜΣ ΟΚ≅Μ Β03,/3 0&<4/& EX. EP EX. EP 311.83 312.42 312.26 312.59312.64 312.89 312.09 311.88 311.63 311.99 311.72 311.76 311.48311.62 311.50 310.91 310.25310.97 314.59
313.62 312.49 311.87 311.85 311.69 311.52 311.38 311.28 311.37 311.24 313.46 312.34 311.78 311.75 311.57 311.52 311.28 311.25 311.29 311.18 314.47 BUILDING F EX. ENTRANCE TO REMAIN
(TO REMAIN) TO REMAIN EX. BUILDING GARAGE ENTRANCE LOADING ENTRANCE LOADING ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE LOADING ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE LOADING ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE
GARAGE ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE BUILDING E BUILDING D BUILDING C BUILDING B BUILDING A LOADING ENTRANCE ONLY ONLY ONLY ONLY ONLY ONLY (1 LOADING SPACE AT 15'X30') (1 LOADING SPACE AT
15'X30') (1 LOADING SPACE AT 15'X30') (2 LOADING SPACES - 15'X30' AND 12'X30') (2 LOADING SPACES - 15'X30' AND 12'X30') (NON-RESIDENTIAL) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 1 23 24 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 22 GAR= 321.13 FF=231.46 GAR= 319.82 FF=320.40 GAR= 321.86 FF=323.61 GAR= 321.86
FF=323.61 GAR= 321.36 FF=323.11 GAR= 320.40 FF=321.11 GAR= 329.96 FF=331.71 GAR= 327.20 FF=328.36 GAR= 326.29 FF=326.87 GAR= 323.86 FF=324.19 GAR= 329.26 FF=329.80 GAR= 325.50 FF=326.04
GAR= 323.31 FF=324.03 GAR= 326.54 FF=327.12 GAR= 323.90 FF=325.10 GAR= 328.60 FF=329.80 GAR= 324.20 FF=324.50 GAR= 328.20 FF=328.60 GAR= 319.80 FF=320.80 GAR= 323.50 FF=323.80 GAR=
321.13 FF=221.46 GAR= 320.74 FF=221.07 (2R) R=12'R=10' R=15' R=15' R=12' R=10' R=25' R=24' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=44' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=44' R=10'
R=10' R=10' R=10' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=14' R=15' R=7.5' R=113' R=87' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=6' R=6' R=10' R=40' R=20' R=40'
R=40' R=40' R=40'R=45'R=45' R=40' R=40' EYE 2 EYE 5 EYE 1 EYE 3 EYE 4 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4
FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE SU-30 AASHTO 2011 (US) SU-30 AASHTO 2011 (US) SU-30 AASHTO 2011 (US) SU-30 AASHTO 2011 (US) SU-30
AASHTO 2011 (US) SU-30 AASHTO 2011 (US) SU-30 AASHTO 2011 (US) SU-30 AASHTO 2011 (US) SU-30 AASHTO 2011 (US) SU-30 AASHTO 2011 (US) SU-30 AASHTO 2011 (US) SU-30 AASHTO 2011 (US) SU-30
AASHTO 2011 (US) SU-30 AASHTO 2011 (US) SU-30 AASHTO 2011 (US) 255 Item a. 07/03/19 ΡΒ≅Κ∆9 ΡΓ∆∆Σ ΕΗΚ∆ Μν− Οκµµδθρ ∆µφηµδδθρ Κµχρβοδ ≅θβγησδβσρ Κµχ Ρτθυδξνθρ Τθαµ+ Κσχ− ϖϖϖ−τθαµ,κσχ−βνλ
Σδκ− 6/2−531−7/7/ ≅µµµχκδ+ Υηθφηµη 11//2 6601 Κησσκδ Θηυδθ Στθµοηϕδ TM ΟΚ≅Μ Χ≅Σ∆ No.DATEDESCRIPTION Θ∆ΥΗΡΗΝΜΡ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΥΗΚΚ≅Φ∆ ΣΝςΜ ΝΕ Κ∆∆ΡΑΤΘΦ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΨΟ,130/ ΨΝΜΗΜΦ Λ≅Ο ≅Λ∆ΜΧΛ∆ΜΣ
Ε ∆ Μ Η Φ Μν−/11/37 Χ≅ΥΗΧ Σ− Λβ∆ΚΓ≅Μ∆Ξ Γ Ν ς Μ Ν Λ Λ Κ ≅ Σ ∆ Β Ο Θ Ν Μ Η Υ Ε Ν Η Θ Φ Η Θ ≅ ∆ ∆ ≅ Ρ Ν Μ Η Ρ ∆ Μ Κ 10/27/2021 07/03/19FIRST SUBMISSION 1 02/27/20 02/27/20SECOND SUBMISSION
2 09/25/20 09/25/20THIRD SUBMISSION 3 03/12/21 03/12/21FOURTH SUBMISSION 4 06/29/21 06/29/21FIFTH SUBMISSION 5 10/27/21FINAL PLANNING COMMISSION SET 6 10/27/21 78A ∆Λ∆ΘΦ∆ΜΒΞ ≅ΒΒ∆ΡΡ
ΟΚ≅Μ Β04,/0 0&<4/& N VA. STATE GRID NORTH 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE050 50 100 50 20025 EXISTING WATERMAIN PROP. WATERMAIN MEASUREMENT FROM END OF FAAR/AFAAR TO MOST
REMOTE POINT OF FIRST FLOOR (DISTANCE NOT SHOWN WHERE MEASUREMENT AROUND BUILDING IS OBVIOULSY LESS THAN 150') NOTE: ALL BUILDINGS INCLUDING TOWNHOUSES AND 2-OVER-2 UNITS WILL HAVE
SPRINKLER SYSTEMS IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA 13R %%ULEGEND AERIAL FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD (AFAAR) FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS ROAD (FARR)BUIL %%UNOTE: FAIRFAX STREET SE CATOCTIN CIRCLE SE
HARRISON STREET SE CATOCTIN CIRCLE WATERLINE ESMT D.B. 1577 PG. 2110 10' WATERLINE ESMT D.B. 1007 PG 393 10' WATERLINE ESMT D.B. 1007 PG 393 10' WATERLINE ESMT D.B. 1007 PG 393 10'
WATERLINE EASEMENT D.B. 1007 PG 393 (EX. 70' R.O.W.) (EX. 70' R.O.W.) (EX. 70' R.O.W.) (EX. 50' R.O.W.) MADISON COURT 0.9' 0.4' 97.6' S KING STREET EX. EP EX. EP FAIRFAX STREET SE
\pxqc;50' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;50' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;50' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;50' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;150' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;150' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER
\pxqc;150' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;APPROX. LOC. EX. 8" W/M (URBAN BOULEVARD) (URBAN BOULEVARD) \pxqc;APPROX. LOC. EX. 6" W/M \pxqc;150' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;150' CREEK VALLEY
BUFFER \pxqc;150' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER 311.83 312.42 312.26 312.59312.64 312.89 312.09 311.88 311.63 311.99 311.72 311.76 311.48311.62 311.50 310.91 310.25310.97 314.59 313.62 312.49
311.87 311.85 311.69 311.52 311.38 311.28 311.37 311.24 313.46 312.34 311.78 311.75 311.57 311.52 311.28 311.25 311.29 311.18 314.47 PROP. W/M PROP. W/M PROP. W/M PROP. W/M PROP. W/M
PROP. W/M ESMT PROP. W/M ESMTPROP. W/M ESMT FAIRFAX ST SE FF=322.40 FF=322.40 FF=322.40 FF=322.40 FF=320.00 FF=318.80 FF=321.70FF=322.60FF=330.20 FF=327.50 FF=327.50 FF=327.50 FF=326.50
FF=325.60 FF=325.00 FF=324.40 FF=324.20 FF=325.30 FF=325.30 FF=325.80 FF=326.30 FF=327.00 FF=327.80 13,400 SF FF=322.40 EXISTING WATER SERVICE TO RITE AID FROM EX. W/M IN CATOCTIN CIRCLE
TO BE MAINTAINED. EXISTING WATER SERVICE TO RILEY PROPERTY FROM EX. W/M IN CATOCTIN CIRCLE TO BE MAINTAINED. ONLY ONLY ONLY ONLY ONLY ONLY (GENERAL STREET) HIGH STREET (PRIVATE GENERAL
STREET) PRIVATE ROAD 'B' PRIVATE ROAD 'C' MADISON COURT PRIVATE ROAD 'A' ONE WAY MADISON COURT ONE WAY MADISON COURT PRIVATE ROAD 'D' (RESIDENTIAL) (RESIDENTIAL) (PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL)
(PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL) (RESIDENTIAL) (RESIDENTIAL) (PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL) (RESIDENTIAL) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39
40 41 42 43 1 23 24 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 22 PROP. W/M ESMT PROP. W/M ESMT PROP. W/M ESMT PROP. W/M ESMT PROP. W/M ESMT PROP. W/M ESMT \pxqr;EX. W/M TO BE REMOVED OR ABANDONED
PROP. W/M ESMT PROP. W/M ESMT PROP. W/M ESMT \pxql;EX. W/M TO BE REMOVED OR ABANDONED EYE 2 EYE 5 EYE 1 EYE 3 EYE 4 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE
4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE BUILDING F TO REMAIN EX. BUILDING GARAGE ENTRANCE
LOADING ENTRANCE LOADING ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE LOADING ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE LOADING ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE BUILDING E BUILDING
D BUILDING C BUILDING A LOADING ENTRANCE BUILDING HEIGHT < 50' HEIGHT=70' HEIGHT=70' HEIGHT 25' FIRE WALL BUILDING B GARAGE (NO OCCUPIABLE SPACE) HEIGHT=70' HEIGHT=70' BUILDING B HEIGHT
< 50' BUILDING HEIGHT < 50' BUILDING HEIGHT < 50' BUILDING HEIGHT < 50' BUILDING HEIGHT < 50' BUILDING HEIGHT < 50' BUILDING HEIGHT < 50' BUILDING HEIGHT < 50' BUILDING HEIGHT < 50'
BUILDING HEIGHT < 50' BUILDING HEIGHT < 50' ±15 ±60 150' 130' 150' NO OCCUPIABLE SPACE BELOW FIRST FLOOR ON THIS SIDE OF BUILDING 150' 150' 150' 150' 150' 47' 150' 150' 133' 150' 150'
150' 150' 67'28' 25' 26' 19' 20' 20' 24' 150' 21' 25' 25' 24' 150' 23' 23' 27' 24' 18' 24' 18' 27' 32' 26' 26'26' 28' 150' 150' 150' 47' 150' 26' 19' 19' 57' ±55' ±170' 57' 93' ±60
150' \pxqc;NOTE: PROPER IDENTIFICATION OF THE 6' REINFORCED PEDESTRIAN AREA AS A FIRE LANE WILL BE COORDINATED WITH THE FIRE MARSHAL AT TIME OF SITE PLAN. \pxqc;6' REINFORCED PEDESTRIAN
AREA 122' \pxqc;MAIN ENTRANCE \pxqc;MAIN ENTRANCE \pxqc;MAIN ENTRANCE \pxqc;MAIN ENTRANCE \pxqc;MAIN ENTRANCE \pxqc;6' REINFORCED PEDESTRIAN AREA 150' NON-ELEVATED ACCESS ROAD 256 Item
a. {\Fcomplex|c0;SHEET C16-02} {\Fcomplex|c0;SHEET C16-04}{\Fcomplex|c0;SHEET C16-03} {\Fcomplex|c0;SHEET C16-05} ΣΘ∆∆ ΗΜΥ∆ΜΣΝΘΞ % ΒΝΜΧΗΣΗΝΜ ≅Μ≅ΚΞΡΗΡ , ΣΘ∆∆ Λ≅Μ≅Φ∆Λ∆ΜΣ Θ∆ΟΝΘΣ 0!<5/&
Β05,/0 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE060 60 120 60 24030 N VA. STATE GRID NORTH 07/03/19 ΡΒ≅Κ∆9 ΡΓ∆∆Σ ΕΗΚ∆ Μν− Οκµµδθρ ∆µφηµδδθρ Κµχρβοδ ≅θβγησδβσρ Κµχ Ρτθυδξνθρ
Τθαµ+ Κσχ− ϖϖϖ−τθαµ,κσχ−βνλ Σδκ− 6/2−531−7/7/ ≅µµµχκδ+ Υηθφηµη 11//2 6601 Κησσκδ Θηυδθ Στθµοηϕδ TM ΟΚ≅Μ Χ≅Σ∆ No.DATEDESCRIPTION Θ∆ΥΗΡΗΝΜΡ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΥΗΚΚ≅Φ∆ ΣΝςΜ ΝΕ Κ∆∆ΡΑΤΘΦ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅
ΨΟ,130/ ΨΝΜΗΜΦ Λ≅Ο ≅Λ∆ΜΧΛ∆ΜΣ Ε ∆ Μ Η Φ Μν−/11/37 Χ≅ΥΗΧ Σ− Λβ∆ΚΓ≅Μ∆Ξ Γ Ν ς Μ Ν Λ Λ Κ ≅ Σ ∆ Β Ο Θ Ν Μ Η Υ Ε Ν Η Θ Φ Η Θ ≅ ∆ ∆ ≅ Ρ Ν Μ Η Ρ ∆ Μ Κ 10/27/2021 07/03/19FIRST SUBMISSION 1 02/27/20
02/27/20SECOND SUBMISSION 2 09/25/20 09/25/20THIRD SUBMISSION 3 03/12/21 03/12/21FOURTH SUBMISSION 4 06/29/21 06/29/21FIFTH SUBMISSION 5 10/27/21FINAL PLANNING COMMISSION SET 6 10/27/21
This Plan Prepared or Approved by: Kevin J. Tankersley, ISA Certified Arborist # MA-5871A LEGEND DRIPLINE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE TRUNK LOCATION EXCELLENT 80.1 - 100% GOOD 60.1 - 80% FAIR
40.1 - 60% POOR 20.1 - 40% VERY POOR / DEAD 0-20% TREE CONDITION CATEGORIES ARE PER THE GUIDE FOR PLANT APPRAISAL ,10TH EDITION, BY THE COUNCIL OF TREE AND LANDSCAPE APPRAISERS. SEE
SHEET C16-06 FOR TREE INVENTORY AND CONDITION ANALYSIS / TREE MANAGEMENT REPORT ROOT PRUNING PER DCSM ARTICLE 8.420.2 TYPICAL ROOT PRUNING DETAIL TREE TO BE REMOVED 4 bol5R ch 4R 2
gm bol gm ch ch ch 5R gm gm 4R 5R ch gm 4R vent ~ asphalt ~ ~ asphalt ~ ~ asphalt ~ ~ asphalt ~ ~ asphalt ~ ~ asphalt ~ ~ asphalt ~ ~ asphalt ~ ~ asphalt ~ ~ asphalt ~ concrete 2 gm2
bol eb 2 bol 2 bol 2 bol ws ws ws (typ) ws (typ) gv 4 bol ep ep ep ws (typ) dig 2R gm 2 bol ep conc. 7R 6R gm 3 bol 4R 19R ~ dirt ~ ~ grass ~ ~ grass ~ ~ grass ~ worn foot path 8' gravel
drive ~ asphalt ~ ep ep ep ep a/c units on raised platform dumpster bol ~ asphalt ~ ~ asphalt ~ ~ asphalt ~ ~ asphalt ~ brick paver s/w dig dig dig dig dig dig ssmh sdmh sdmh sdmh sdmhsdmh
sdmh sdmh ssmh ssmh roof overhang over conc. s/w ~ grass ~ ep roof overhang over conc. s/w roof overhang over conc. s/w covered conc. s/w covered conc. s/w drive-through canopy drive-through
canopy conc. s/w conc. s/w speed bump speed bump speed bump lsa lsa lsa lsa lsa lsa lsa lsa lsa lsa 2R lsa 5R ~ asphalt ~ ~ asphalt ~ ~ asphalt ~ vb vb vb tb tb tbcb tb conc. barriers
conc. s/w hand rail ssmh ssmh ssmh ssmh ssmh sdmh sdmh sdmh 2 bol 2 gm 2 gm 2 gm 2 gm gm gm cofdccowater meter vault w / 4 bollards conc. conc. conc. conc. conc. conc. conc. conc. 6R
water meter vault w / 4 bollards water meter vault w / 4 bollards conc. conc. sdmh sdmh sdmh sdmh sdmh sdmhWells Fargo sign ssmh a/c units on raised platform a/c units on raised platform
4' metal barrier a/c units on raised platform a/c units on raised platform a/c units on raised platform 2 bol 2 bol electric transformer on conc. pad conc. end wall 24" rcp conc. end
wall 18" rcp sdmh conc. end wall asphalt trail asphalt trail riprap conc. end wall tmh conc. end wall 2 gm 2 gm 2 gm co 7 gm a/c units on raised platform a/c units on raised platform
a/c units on raised platform 4' metal barrier a/c unit co conc. conc. fdc fdca/c units electric boxes conc. wm wm conc. electric box on conc. pad comcast boxes within fence bol bol
5.0'x8.4' brick A.T.M. overhang 2R wm conc. s/w conc. s/w conc. s/w conc. s/w conc. s/w bol conc. s/w conc. s/w conc. s/w conc. s/w fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fcfc gv fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc conc. s/w roof overhang over conc. s/w ws (typ) a/c units electric boxes retaining wall bol metal hand rail co em electric box 3
bol gm 2 wm 2R 2R 1R 1R 1R co co ssmh 3 bol gm em gv em a/c a/c bol wm wm gm ev ev electric boxes em Virginia Village sign sdmh tel ped tel ped fc fc speed bump conc. conc. conc. communicatio
ns vault ev ev ev ev gv conc. s/w 6' chain link fence vault lsa lsa lsa lsa lsalsa lsa fc fc fc fc fc wm gravel drive gm6' chain link fence co fc fc fc conc. barriers tb tel ped 21
12 7 21 21 21 21 21 18 7 5 9 17 17 11 6 5 23 5 28 14 12 10 20 23 26 17 18 23 23 27 19 12 12 10 3 roof overhang 4' metal barrier 4' metal barrier 4' metal barrier 4' metal barrier 4'
metal barrier raised loading dock raised loading dock 8'x12' shed 0.6' off of property line 24'x36' garage wood fencegate wood fence wood fencewire fence wm 2.8' 0.9' 10'x14' shed mail
box roof overhang covered stairway 16 not a space retaining wall dilapidated structure attached to building TEMPORARY CUL DE SAC ESMT AS SHOWN ON PLAT REC PLAT CAB C SLOT 203 PG 5 FAIRFAX
STREET SE 10' C & P TEL. CO RIGHT - OF - WAY D.B. 594 PG. 680 15' UTILITY ESMT D.B. 403 PG. 227 15' UTILITY ESMT D.B. 403 PG. 227 CATOCTIN CIRCLE SE APPROX LOC. C & P ESMT D.B. 528
PG. 477 15' UTILITY ESMT D.B. 403 PG. 227 15' UTILITY ESMT D.B. 403 PG. 227 10' C & P ESMT D.B. 504 PG. 254 APPROX. LOCATION VEPCO ESMT D.B. 509 PG 86 APPROX. LOCATION VEPCO ESMT
D.B. 811 PG 1179 INGRESS & EGRESS ESMT D.B. 1007 PG 393 INGRESS & EGRESS ESMT D.B. 810 PG 429 HARRISON STREET SE CATOCTIN CIRCLE 15' UTILITY ESMT D.B. 356 PG. 498 10' BELL ATLANTIC
ESMT D.B. 1439 PG. 366 APPROX. LOCATION BELL ATLANTIC ESMT D.B. 1821 PG. 2378 APPROX LOCATION BELL ATLANTIC ESMT D.B. 1821 PG. 2378 10' C & P TEL. CO RIGHT - OF - WAY 10' BELL
ATLANTIC ESMT D.B. 730 PG. 162 D.B. 1439 PG. 366 16' TRAIL ESMT INST # 20160212-0007940 15' SLOPE MAINTENANCE ESMT D.B. 793 PG. 137 30' UTILITY ESMT D.B. 358 PG. 498 10' C & P TEL.
CO RIGHT OF - WAY D.B. 594 PG. 680 10' C & P TEL. CO RIGHT OF - WAY D.B. 720 PG. 776 10' C & P TEL. CO ESMT D.B. 730 PG. 162 10' BELL ATLANTIC ESMT D.B. 1439 PG. 366 \pxqc;15'
SLOPE MAINTENANCE ESMT D.B. 793 PG. 137 \pxqc;16' TRAIL ESMT INST # 20160212-0007940 (EX. 70' R.O.W.) (EX. 70' R.O.W.) (EX. 70' R.O.W.) (EX. 50' R.O.W.) MADISON COURT FEMA REGULATORY
FLOODWAY REGULATORY FLOODWAY (SEE NOTE 5) NO PARKING NO PARKING 0.9' FEMA REGULATORY FLOODWAY & FEMA REGULATORY FLOODWAY & FEMA ZONE "X" (SEE NOTE 5) FEMA ZONE "X" (SEE NOTE 5) \pxqc;10'
WALK WAY ESMT D.B. 790 PG. 597 0.4' 34 APPARENT OVERLAP LINE PER D.B. 708 PG.37 LINE PER D.B. 349 PG. 229 APPARENT OVERLAP INGRESS/EGRESS AGREEMENT D.B. 891 PG 1644 97.6' 10' C & P
TEL. CO RIGHT - OF - WAY D.B. 594 PG. 680 S KING STREET ~ asphalt ~ concrete ~ asphalt ~ conc.2R 4.1' 18 I J K H G F E D C B A 17 16 15 13 14 12 7 6 5 19 20 11 38 37 8 9 10 4 3 2 1
21 22 27" rcp 21" rcp 21" rcp 18" rcp 15" rcp18" rcp 21" rcp 21" rcp 21" rcp 30" rcp 30" rcp 24" rcp 24" rcp 24" rcp 24" rcp 42" rcp 42" rcp 24 26 28 30 128"x83" cmp 128"x83" cmp 128"x83"
cmp 128"x83" cmp 23 25 27 29 31 32 18" rcp 15" rcp str 41 inv. in 24" rcp = 298.52' str 39inv. in 18" rcp = 298.76' str 42- ew inv. in 24" rcp = 299.39' str 40- ew inv. in 18" rcp =
299.46' 41 42 39 40 24" rcp 18" rcp 24"x36" elip 24"x36" elip 35 34 33 8" SAN SEW 8" SAN SEW 8" SAN SEW 8" SAN SEW 8" SAN SEW 8" SAN SEW 8" SAN SEW 8" SAN SEW 8" SAN SEW c.o. SAN LAT
SAN LAT 302 304 306 308 330 334 334 336 332 330 328 326 324 336 334 332 330 328 334 332 330 328 \pxt1;320 328 330 308 306 308 310 300 308 322 318 320 306 310 308 322 310 316 314 312
336 310 312 314 316 318 320 322 324 326 328 310 314 318 320 322 324 326 328 330 326 320 322 324 332 330 328 340 338 336 334 332 326 324 322 318 316 314 312 310 306 304 302 322 320 318
316 316 314 312 310 308 300 298 300 298 300 298 306 304 302 300 EX. EP EX. EP EX. SHOULDER FAIRFAX STREET SE \pxqc;FLOODPLAN OVERLAY DISTRICT \pxqc;FLOODPLAN OVERLAY DISTRICT \pxqc;FLOODPLAN
OVERLAY DISTRICT \pxqc;FLOODPLAN OVERLAY DISTRICT \pxqc;50' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;50' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;50' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;50' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;150'
CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;150' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;150' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER 324 323 323 322 321 \pxqc;APPROX. LOC. EX. 8" W/M 0+00.00 1+00.00 2+00.00 3+00.00 4+00.00 5+00.00 6+00.00
7+00.00 8+00.00 9+00.00 10+00.00 11+00.00 12+00.00 13+00.00 14+00.00 15+00.00 15+31.37 (URBAN BOULEVARD) (URBAN BOULEVARD) STR 23 - inv = 293.71' STR 25 - inv = 293.41' STR 27 - inv
= 293.44' STR 29 - inv = 293.71' str 18 - curb inlet top = 318.28' inv. out 18" rcp = 312.16' STR 17 - CURB INLET TOP = 317.70' INV. IN FR 18- 15" RCP = 311.58' INV. OUT 18" RCP =
311.04' str 16 - curb inlet top = 316.52' inv. in fr 17 - 15" rcp = 310.68' inv. in fr 19- 18" rcp = 311.53' inv. out 21" rcp = 306.59' str 15 - curb inlet top = 309.48' inv. in 21"
rcp = 301.95' inv. out 21" rcp = 300.83' str 13 - mh top = 309.27' inv. in fr 15 - 21" rcp = 299.45' inv. in fr 12 - 21" rcp = 303.93' inv. out 27" rcp = 299.44' str 14 - es 27" inv
out = 296.32 str 12 - mh top = 318.24' inv. in 21" rcp = 307.01' inv. out 21" rcp = 306.84' str 11 - top grate = 316.76' inv. out 21" rcp = 309.59' str 6 - top = 311.17' inv. in 42"
rcp = 303.27' inv. out 42" rcp str 6 - es inv. out 42" rcp = 302.03' str 19- curb inlet top = 317.07' inv. in fr 20- 18" rcp = 311.53' inv. out 18" rcp = 311.50' str 20 - curb inlet
top = 317.35' inv. out 18" rcp = 312.80' str 8 - top curb inlet = 322.17' inv. in fr 9 - 30" rcp = 309.55' inv. out 30" rcp = 309.38' str 9 - top grate = 322.24' inv. in fr 10 - 21"
rcp = 316.91' str 10 - top grate = 322.36' inv. out 21" rcp = 317.51' str 5 - top = 317.99' inv. in 24" rcp = 310.84' inv. in 30" rcp = 305.47' inv. out 42" rcp = str 4 - top = 318.55'
inv. in 24" rcp = 313.59' inv. out 24" rcp = 313.30' str 22- curb inlet top = 326.79' inv. in 15" rcp = 322.24' str 21- curb inlet top = 326.27' inv. out 15" rcp = 322.40' str 30
inv = 292.41' str 28 - inv = 292.66' str 26 - inv = 292.53' str 24 - inv = 292.55'str 32 - 18" rcp end wall = 295.49' str 31 - 18" rcp - inv 295.33' str 38- ew inv. in 15" rcp = 297.86'
str 41 inv. in 24" rcp = 298.52' str 39inv. in 18" rcp = 298.76' str 42- ew inv. in 24" rcp = 299.39' str 40- ew inv. in 18" rcp = 299.46' str 35 - ew 24x36" inv out = 296.63 str 33
- ew 24x36" inv out = 296.42 str 34 - curb inlet - 24x36" inv out = 297.05 STR 17 - CURB INLET TOP = 317.70' INV. IN FR 18- 15" RCP = 311.58' INV. OUT 18" RCP = 311.04' 24" rcp 24"
rcp 24" rcp 24" rcp \pxqc;APPROX. LOC. EX. 6" W/M \pxqc;150' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;150' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;150' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER 311.83 312.42 312.26 312.59312.64 312.89
312.09 311.88 311.63 311.99 311.72 311.76 311.48311.62 311.50 310.91 310.25310.97 314.59 313.62 312.49 311.87 311.85 311.69 311.52 311.38 311.28 311.37 311.24 313.46 312.34 311.78 311.75
311.57 311.52 311.28 311.25 311.29 311.18 10" PVC INV=312.48 10" PVC INV=312.03 BENCH BENCH 314.47 1175 2036 O1 O3 1177 O4 1178 1179 1180 1181 1182 1183 1184 1185 1187 1188 O5 1189
1190 1191 1192 1193 O6 O7 O8 1194 1195 1196 1197 1198 1200 1199 1201 1202 1203 1204 1206 1207 1208 1210 1211 1212 1213 1214 O9 1215 1216 1217 1218 1219 12201221 1222 1223 1224 1226
1227 1228 1229 2045 1230 1231 1232 1234 1235 1233 1243 2046 2050 1240 2051 O10 2047 2048 1236 1237 1238 1239 1242 1244 2053 1241 2052 O11 O12 O13 O14 O15 O17 O18 O19 O20 O21 O22 19671959
1960 1962 1964 1958 1954 1955 1956 1957 1952 1961 1963 1965 1951 1950 1953 1946 1945 1943 1942 19441937 1941 1940 1939 1934 1936 193520551931 1932 1247 1176 2037 2041 2042 2043 2044
20392040 2038 2054 2049 O2 O23 1205 1209 1225 O16 1248 1246 1245 24 60 25 10 23 20 22 20 24 20 30 20 27 00 26 30 25 80 25 30 25 30 24 20 23 40 24 40 25 60 27 50 27 50 25 40 26 90 27
20 12 00 12 70 12 50 12 90 07 60 08 40 19 40 19 40 18 80 19 40 22 40 22 40 22 20 22 30 23 00 22 35 22 03 22 20 23 0023 00 25 00 27 00 27 80 3140 30 80 24 00 25 10 27 50 1.4%%% 324 326
324 326 322 320 318 316 314 314 320 316 318 308 310 312 328 330 326 324 322 320 318 316 20 00 322 22 20 322 322 PROP. SAN. SEW. PROP. SAN. SEW. PROP. SAN. SEW. PROP. SAN. SEW. PROP.
W/M PROP. W/M PROP. W/M PROP. W/M PROP. W/M PROP. W/M ESMT PROP. W/M ESMTPROP. W/M ESMT PROP. SAN. ESMT. PROP. SAN. ESMT. LOC LOC LOC LOC LOC LOC LOC LOC LOC LOC LOC FAIRFAX ST SE \A1;26.0'
\A1;26.0' \A1;24.0' \A1;24.0' \A1;26.0' BUILDING F EX. ENTRANCE TO REMAIN (TO REMAIN) TO REMAIN EX. BUILDING GARAGE ENTRANCE LOADING ENTRANCE LOADING ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE GARAGE
ENTRANCE LOADING ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE LOADING ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE BUILDING E BUILDING D BUILDING C BUILDING B BUILDING A FF=322.40 FF=322.40
FF=322.40 FF=322.40 FF=320.00 FF=318.80 FF=321.70FF=322.60FF=330.20 FF=327.50 FF=327.50 FF=327.50 FF=326.50 FF=325.60 FF=325.00 FF=324.40 FF=324.20 FF=325.30 FF=325.30 FF=325.80 FF=326.30
FF=327.00 FF=327.80 13,400 SF BRIDGE EYE 1 EYE 3 EYE 5 315' SIGHT DISTANCE (LEFT) OBJ. 315' SIGHT DISTANCE (LEFT) OBJ. 315' SIGHT DISTANCE (LEFT) OBJ. BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) BUILD TO
LINE (TYP.) BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) 22 40 22 40 1460 22 40 21 80 17 70 320 318
316 314 318 TW=315.80 BW=311.20 TW=315.80 BW=311.00 TW=317.70 BW=304.50 TW=322.20 BW=322.20 TW=317.70 BW=305.00TW=321.20 BW=320.70 304 306 308 310 312 LOADING ENTRANCE TW=319.40 BW=303.50
TW=319.40 BW=304.00TW=319.40 BW=304.00 04 10 {\W0.75;STAIRS} FF=322.40 EXISTING WATER SERVICE TO RITE AID FROM EX. W/M IN CATOCTIN CIRCLE TO BE MAINTAINED. EXISTING WATER SERVICE TO
RILEY PROPERTY FROM EX. W/M IN CATOCTIN CIRCLE TO BE MAINTAINED. ONLY ONLY ONLY ONLY OBJ. EYE 2 335' SIGHT DISTANCE (RIGHT) OBJ.315' SIGHT DISTANCE (LEFT) OBJ. 335' SIGHT DISTANCE (RIGHT)
OBJ. 315' SIGHT DISTANCE (LEFT) ONLY ONLY \A1;15.0' \A1;24.0' \A1;15.0' \A1;15.0' \A1;15.0' \A1;15.0' 22.0' (TYP.) \A1;40.0' 8.0' TYP. \A1;24.0' 24.0' TYP. \A1;15.0' \A1;28.1' \A1;29.9'
\A1;9.9' \A1;19.8' \A1;18.1' \A1;30.0' \A1;%%P220' SIGHT DISTANCE ESMT SIGHT DISTANCE ESMT SIGHT DISTANCE ESMT SIGHT DISTANCE ESMT SIGHT DISTANCE ESMT SIGHT DISTANCE ESMT (1 LOADING
SPACE AT 15'X30') (1 LOADING SPACE AT 15'X30') (1 LOADING SPACE AT 15'X30') (2 LOADING SPACES - 15'X30' AND 12'X30') (2 LOADING SPACES - 15'X30' AND 12'X30') \pxqr;EX. TRASH ENCLOSURE
TO REMAIN THIS PORTION OF FAIRFAX STREET WILL BE VACATED AS FURTHER COORDINATED WITH THE TOWN. NOTE THE VACATION OF FAIRFAX STREET IS NOT REQUIRED FOR APPROVAL OF THIS APPLICATION.
HOWEVER, THE VACATION WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR ANY PORTION OF THIS PLAN. \pxqr;{\Fsimplex|c0;\T0.9;\C256;INTERSECTION SHALL BE A RAISED INTERSECTION AND
BE SIGNALIZED AS WARRANTED AND COORDINATED WITH VODT AND THE TOWN OF LEESBURG.} * \pxqr;POSSIBLE APPROX. ALTERNATE LIMITS OF CLEARING AND GRADING FOR EXCAVATION IN THE FLOODPLAIN TO
MITIGATE RISE IN THE FLOODPLAIN WATER SURFACE ELEVATION IF NECESSARY. (GENERAL STREET) EX. PUBLIC STREET (TO BE VACATED) \pxql;PROP. PRIVATE STREET 400 1,200 600 1,600 200 2,300 \pxqr;BIKE
RACK (TYP.) \pxqr;BIKE RACK (TYP.) \pxqr;BIKE RACK (TYP.) \pxqr;BIKE RACK (TYP.) \A1;%%P260' \A1;%%P300' \A1;%%P175' \A1;%%P115' \pxqr;LANDSCAPE WALL (NON-RESIDENTIAL) BUILD TO LINE
(TYP.) \pxqr;EX. GUARDRAIL TO BE REMOVED AS NECESSARY TO CONNECT TO EX. SIDEWALK {OURS OVERLOOK} (SEE L SERIES SHEETS FOR {HIGH STREET PARK} (SEE L SERIES SHEETS FOR DETAILS) \A1;28.5'
HIGH STREET (PRIVATE GENERAL STREET) \pxql;POSSIBLE WATER QUALITY STRUCTURE PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM.
SEW. PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. ESMT. PROP. STM. ESMT. PROP. STM. ESMT. PROP. STM. SEW.PROP. STM. ESMT. PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. SEW.
PROP. STM. ESMT. PROP. STM. ESMT. {\W0.8;PROP. OUTFALL DITCH} \pxqr;EXISTING 42" RCP TO BE REMOVED. PRIVATE ROAD 'B' PRIVATE ROAD 'C' MADISON COURT PRIVATE ROAD 'A' ONE WAY MADISON
COURT ONE WAY MADISON COURT PRIVATE ROAD 'D' (RESIDENTIAL) (RESIDENTIAL) (PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL) (PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL) (RESIDENTIAL) (RESIDENTIAL) (PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL) (RESIDENTIAL)
TW=315.00 BW=313.50 TW=315.00 BW=310.80 TW=314.00 BW=309.20 TW=311.00 BW=308.50 TW=316.50 BW=309.60 TW=320.00 BW=312.10 TW=321.00 BW=315.50 TW=322.20 BW=319.60 TW=323.40 BW=323.00 TW=331.25
331.00 TW=334.00 BW=331.00 TW=332.00 BW=330.00TW=328.50 BW=328.25 6' SCREEN WALL 6' SCREEN WALL RET. WALL WITH 6' SCREEN WALL ABOVE LOC LOC LOC LOC LOC LOC \pxqr;PROP. PRIVATE STREET
\pxql;EX. PUBLIC STREET RET. WALL WITH 6' SCREEN WALL POSS. CONNECTION TO CLEMONS PROPERTY 6' SCREEN WALL 6' SCREEN WALL RET. WALL BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) BUILD TO
LINE (TYP.) BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) \pxqc;6' REINFORCED PEDESTRIAN AREA {COMMON GREEN} (SEE L SERIES SHEETS FOR DETAILS) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 1 23 24 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 22 PROP. SAN. ESMT. PROP. SAN. ESMT. PROP. SAN. ESMT. PROP. SAN. ESMT. \A1;24.0'
\A1;24.0' \A1;24.0' \A1;14.0' \A1;%%P31.0' \A1;24.0' \A1;24.0' \A1;24.0' \A1;24.0' \A1;30.0' 22.0' (TYP). 8.0' (TYP.) \A1;12.0' \A1;24.0' \A1;%%P30.5' \A1;%%P30.5' \A1;%%P30.5' \A1;%%P30.5'
\A1;24.0' \A1;14.0' \pxqc;MOUNTABLE CURB \pxqc;MOUNTABLE CURB GAR= 321.13 FF=231.46 21 66 30 80 30 60 30 73 GAR= 319.82 FF=320.40 GAR= 321.86 FF=323.61 GAR= 321.86 FF=323.61 GAR= 321.36
FF=323.11 GAR= 320.40 FF=321.11 GAR= 329.96 FF=331.71 GAR= 327.20 FF=328.36 GAR= 326.29 FF=326.87 GAR= 323.86 FF=324.19 GAR= 329.26 FF=329.80 GAR= 325.50 FF=326.04 GAR= 323.31 FF=324.03
GAR= 326.54 FF=327.12 GAR= 323.90 FF=325.10 GAR= 328.60 FF=329.80 GAR= 324.20 FF=324.50 GAR= 328.20 FF=328.60 GAR= 319.80 FF=320.80 GAR= 323.50 FF=323.80 35 10 28 89 28 29 26 69 25
39 22 50 21 70 22 10 21 70 22 40 GAR= 321.13 FF=221.46 GAR= 320.74 FF=221.07 22 40 21 70 22 20 20 5020 70 24 40 23 50 22 90 23 50 324 324 324 322 322 320 320 320 320 320 322 322 322
324 322 322 324 326 328 330 328 326 324 322 324 326 328330 334 332 330 328 326 324 324 322 320 318 318 318 318 318 318 320 322 316 314 312 324 328 23 60 26 90 27 60 25 20 24 30 324
322 322 324 324 318 316 314 318 316 322 326 324 326 TW=329.00 BW=326.50 TW=326.00 BW=326.00 TW=329.60 BW=328.50 22 00 23 30 22 20 21 34 21 10 20 70 22 10 20 00 18 50 19 30 17 90 17
50 17 80 18 60 18 30 19 10 19 20 16 80 18 09 18 66 18 47 20 07 22 5122 97 25 10 24 16 30 10 29 50 26 20 23 10 18 20 18 20 (2R) 322.10 318.30 17 80 STEPS REQUIRED TW=315.00 BW=314.50
PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. SEW. PROP. STM. ESMT. PROP. STM. ESMT. PROP.
STM. ESMT. PROP. STM. ESMT. PROP. W/M ESMT PROP. W/M ESMT PROP. W/M ESMT PROP. W/M ESMT PROP. W/M ESMT PROP. W/M ESMT \pxqr;EX. W/M TO BE REMOVED OR ABANDONED 316 314 312 310 308 316
314 312 06 30 RAMP LOC 1733 1783 1583 322 318 320 320 318 PROP. STM. ESMT. \pxqc;STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ESMT. - PRIVATELY MAINTAINED PROP. STM. ESMT. \pxqc;STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ESMT.
- PRIVATELY MAINTAINED PROP. W/M ESMT PROP. W/M ESMT PROP. STM. ESMT. PROP. W/M ESMT PRIV. SAN. ESMT. PIER BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) \pxqr;BIKE RACK (TYP.) 2430 6' REMOVABLE
WOOD SCREEN \pxql;BUS STOP. LOCATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE AT FINAL ENGINEERING AS COORDINATED WITH THE TOWN RET. WALL WITH 6' SCREEN WALL ABOVE RET. WALL WITH 6' SCREEN WALL ABOVE 6' SCREEN
WALL \pxql;FINAL TRAIL CONNECTION LOCATION SHALL BE IN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE WITH THIS CONCEPT PLAN WITH REASONABLE ALLOWANCES TO BE MADE FOR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN ALTERATIONS IN
ACCORDANCE WITH TOWN ZONING, SUBDIVISION, AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND AS COORDINATED WITH MADISON HOUSE ASSOCIATES. PROP. SAN. SEW. PROP. SAN. SEW. PROP. SAN. SEW. PROP. SAN.
SEW. PROP. SAN. SEW. PROP. SAN. SEW. PROP. SAN. SEW. PROP. SAN. SEW. PROP. SAN. SEW. PROP. SAN. SEW. PROP. SAN. SEW. PROP. R/W FOLLOWING VACATION OF FAIRFAX STREET. PRIV. SAN. ESMT.
PRIV. SAN. LAT. PRIV. SAN. LAT. PRIV. SAN. LAT. PROP. SAN. ESMT. PROP. SAN. ESMT. \pxql;EX. W/M TO BE REMOVED OR ABANDONED 99 00 02 30 RAMP PIER RAISED PLATFORM ABUTMENT LOC LOC LOC
APPROX. LIMITS OF UG SWM FACILITY APPROX. LIMITS OF UG SWM FACILITY {\W0.8;PROP. STM. SEW.} \pxql;PRIVATE \pxql;PUBLIC \pxql;PUBLIC R=12'R=10' R=15' R=15' R=12' R=10' R=25' R=24' R=15'
R=15' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=44' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=44' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=20' R=15' R=15' R=15' R=14' R=15' R=7.5'
R=113' R=87' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=10' R=6' R=6' R=10' R=40' R=20' R=40' R=40' R=40' R=40' R=45'R=45' R=40' R=40' * \A1;10.0' 22 20 \A1;15.0' \A1;16.2' EYE 2 EYE 5 EYE 1 EYE
3 EYE 4 \pxqr;NOTE: EX. DRY UTILITIES TO BE RELOCATED FROM THIS AREA TO CREATE CORRIDOR FOR SANITARY SEWER \A1;23.0' \A1;25.0' THE APPLICANT UNDERSTANDS THAT ANY CHANGES TO THE FLOODPLAIN
OR CHANNEL, NOT SHOWN ON THIS REZONING AND SPECIAL EXCEPTION APPLICATION, AS WELL AS ANYTHING THAT MAY CAUSE A RISE IN THE FLOODPLAIN ON THIS OR ANY ADJACENT PROPERTIES WILL REQUIRE
A NEW SPECIAL EXCEPTION PLAN, WHICH WILL INCLUDE ADDITIONAL MEETINGS WITH THE TOWN COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION HEARINGS. \A1;10.0' 6' SCREEN WALL 6' SCREEN WALL \pxqc;APPROX. POSSIBLE
LOCATION OF MAILBOX (TYP). EXACT LOCATIONS MAY VARY AT TIME OF SITE PLAN. \A1;15.1' 316 SAN C/O (TYP.) \pxqc;6' REINFORCED PEDESTRIAN AREA BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) BUILD TO LINE (TYP.)
BUILD TO LINE (TYP.) \A1;32.0' \A1;31.0' \A1;31.1' \A1;33.6' \A1;33.7' \A1;31.0' PROP. SCREEN WALL 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION
ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE RP RP 257 Item a. TREE INVENTORY & CONDITION ANALYSIS - TREE MANAGEMENT
REPORT 1"=30' C16-02 SCALE: SHEET FILE No. Planners Engineers Landscape Architects Land Surveyors Urban, Ltd. www.urban-ltd.com Tel. 703.642.8080 Annandale, Virginia 22003 7712 Little
River Turnpike PLAN DATE REVISIONS VIRGINIA VILLAGE TOWN OF LEESBURG VIRGINIA ZP-2410 ZONING MAP AMENDMENT F E N I G No.022048 DAVID T. McELHANEY H O W N O M M L A T E C P R O N I V
F O I R G I R A E E A S O N I S E N L This Plan Prepared or Approved by: Kevin J. Tankersley, ISA Certified Arborist # MA-5871A LEGEND TREE TAG NUMBER DRIPLINE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE TRUNK
LOCATION 0000 EXCELLENT 80.1 - 100% GOOD 60.1 - 80% FAIR 40.1 - 60% POOR 20.1 - 40% VERY POOR / DEAD 0-20% TREE CONDITION CATEGORIES ARE PER THE GUIDE FOR PLANT APPRAISAL ,10TH EDITION,
BY THE COUNCIL OF TREE AND LANDSCAPE APPRAISERS. SEE SHEET C16-06 FOR TREE INVENTORY AND CONDITION ANALYSIS / TREE MANAGEMENT REPORT ROOT PRUNING PER DCSM ARTICLE 8.420.2 TYPICAL ROOT
PRUNING DETAIL TREE TO BE REMOVED G G GG G G G G G G G G GG FAIRFAX STREET SE (EX. 50' R.O.W.) MADISON COURT 0.4' E D C B A 5 11 8 9 4 3 2 1 21" rcp 30" rcp 30" rcp 24" rcp 24" rcp
24" rcp 24" rcp 42" rcp FAIRFAX STREET SE 24" rcp 24" rcp O1 O3 1177 O4 1178 1179 1180 1181 1182 1183 1184 1185 1187 1188 O5 1189 1190 1191 1192 1193 O6 O7 O8 1194 1195 1196 1197 1198
1200 1199 1201 1202 1203 1204 1206 1207 1208 1210 1211 1212 1213 1214 O15 O17 O18 O19 O20 O21 O22 O2 O23 1205 1209 O16 LOADING ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE BUILDING B (1 LOADING SPACE AT
15'X30') PRIVATE ROAD 'B' PRIVATE ROAD 'C' MADISON COURT PRIVATE ROAD 'A' ONE WAY MADISON COURT ONE WAY MADISON COURT PRIVATE ROAD 'D' (RESIDENTIAL) (RESIDENTIAL) (PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL)
(PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL) (RESIDENTIAL) (RESIDENTIAL) (PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL) (RESIDENTIAL) 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39
40 41 42 43 1 23 24 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 22 258 Item a. TREE INVENTORY & CONDITION ANALYSIS - TREE MANAGEMENT REPORT 1"=30' C16-03 SCALE: SHEET FILE No. Planners Engineers
Landscape Architects Land Surveyors Urban, Ltd. www.urban-ltd.com Tel. 703.642.8080 Annandale, Virginia 22003 7712 Little River Turnpike PLAN DATE REVISIONS VIRGINIA VILLAGE TOWN
OF LEESBURG VIRGINIA ZP-2410 ZONING MAP AMENDMENT F E N I G No.022048 DAVID T. McELHANEY H O W N O M M L A T E C P R O N I V F O I R G I R A E E A S O N I S E N L This Plan Prepared
or Approved by: Kevin J. Tankersley, ISA Certified Arborist # MA-5871A LEGEND TREE TAG NUMBER DRIPLINE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE TRUNK LOCATION 0000 EXCELLENT 80.1 - 100% GOOD 60.1 - 80% FAIR
40.1 - 60% POOR 20.1 - 40% VERY POOR / DEAD 0-20% TREE CONDITION CATEGORIES ARE PER THE GUIDE FOR PLANT APPRAISAL ,10TH EDITION, BY THE COUNCIL OF TREE AND LANDSCAPE APPRAISERS. SEE
SHEET C16-06 FOR TREE INVENTORY AND CONDITION ANALYSIS / TREE MANAGEMENT REPORT ROOT PRUNING PER DCSM ARTICLE 8.420.2 TYPICAL ROOT PRUNING DETAIL TREE TO BE REMOVED GG GG G G G G
FAIRFAX STREET SE CATOCTIN CIRCLE SE (EX. 70' R.O.W.) I.P.S. 0.9' 0.4' 97.6' S KING STREET E B A 11 8 9 10 21 22 21" rcp 30" rcp 30" rcp FAIRFAX STREET SE (URBAN BOULEVARD) 24" rcp
24" rcp 24" rcp 24" rcp O9 1215 1216 1217 1218 FAIRFAX ST SE BUILDING F LOADING ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE LOADING ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE BUILDING B BUILDING A ONLY
ONLY (1 LOADING SPACE AT 15'X30') (2 LOADING SPACES - 15'X30' AND 12'X30') * (GENERAL STREET) HIGH STREET (PRIVATE GENERAL STREET) MADISON COURT PRIVATE ROAD 'A' ONE WAY MADISON COURT
ONE WAY (PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL) (RESIDENTIAL) (RESIDENTIAL) (PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL) 46 47 48 49 50 259 Item a. TREE INVENTORY & CONDITION ANALYSIS - TREE MANAGEMENT REPORT 1"=30' C16-04
SCALE: SHEET FILE No. Planners Engineers Landscape Architects Land Surveyors Urban, Ltd. www.urban-ltd.com Tel. 703.642.8080 Annandale, Virginia 22003 7712 Little River Turnpike
PLAN DATE REVISIONS VIRGINIA VILLAGE TOWN OF LEESBURG VIRGINIA ZP-2410 ZONING MAP AMENDMENT F E N I G No.022048 DAVID T. McELHANEY H O W N O M M L A T E C P R O N I V F O I R G I R
A E E A S O N I S E N L This Plan Prepared or Approved by: Kevin J. Tankersley, ISA Certified Arborist # MA-5871A LEGEND TREE TAG NUMBER DRIPLINE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE TRUNK LOCATION 0000
EXCELLENT 80.1 - 100% GOOD 60.1 - 80% FAIR 40.1 - 60% POOR 20.1 - 40% VERY POOR / DEAD 0-20% TREE CONDITION CATEGORIES ARE PER THE GUIDE FOR PLANT APPRAISAL ,10TH EDITION, BY THE COUNCIL
OF TREE AND LANDSCAPE APPRAISERS. SEE SHEET C16-06 FOR TREE INVENTORY AND CONDITION ANALYSIS / TREE MANAGEMENT REPORT ROOT PRUNING PER DCSM ARTICLE 8.420.2 TYPICAL ROOT PRUNING DETAIL
TREE TO BE REMOVED G G G G GG G G GG G G G G G G G G G G G G G G CATOCTIN CIRCLE (EX. 70' R.O.W.) I.P.S. I.P.S. 18 I J K H G F E 17 16 15 13 14 12 19 20 11 27" rcp 21" rcp 21" rcp
18" rcp 15" rcp18" rcp 21" rcp 21" rcp 24 26 28 30 128"x83" cmp 128"x83" cmp 128"x83" cmp 128"x83" cmp 23 25 27 29 31 32 18" rcp 24"x36" elip 24"x36" elip 35 34 33 (URBAN BOULEVARD)
STR 23 - inv = 293.71' STR 25 - inv = 293.41' STR 27 - inv = 293.44' STR 29 - inv = 293.71' 128"x83" cmp 128"x83" cmp 128"x83" cmp 128"x83" cmp 1175 2036 1217 1218 1219 12201221 1222
1223 1224 1226 1227 1228 1229 2045 1230 1231 1232 1234 1235 1233 1243 2046 19671959 1960 1962 1964 1958 1954 1955 1956 1957 1952 1961 1963 1965 1951 1950 1953 1946 1945 1943 1942 19441937
1941 1940 1939 1934 1936 19352055 1931 1932 1176 2037 2041 2042 2043 2044 20392040 2038 1225 1248 FAIRFAX ST SE BUILDING F GARAGE ENTRANCE LOADING ENTRANCE LOADING ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE
GARAGE ENTRANCE GARAGE ENTRANCE BUILDING E BUILDING D BUILDING C BUILDING B LOADING ENTRANCE ONLY ONLY ONLY ONLY (1 LOADING SPACE AT 15'X30') (1 LOADING SPACE AT 15'X30') (2 LOADING
SPACES - 15'X30' AND 12'X30') (GENERAL STREET) (NON-RESIDENTIAL) * 260 Item a. TREE INVENTORY & CONDITION ANALYSIS - TREE MANAGEMENT REPORT 1"=30' C16-05 SCALE: SHEET FILE No. Planners
Engineers Landscape Architects Land Surveyors Urban, Ltd. www.urban-ltd.com Tel. 703.642.8080 Annandale, Virginia 22003 7712 Little River Turnpike PLAN DATE REVISIONS VIRGINIA VILLAGE
TOWN OF LEESBURG VIRGINIA ZP-2410 ZONING MAP AMENDMENT F E N I G No.022048 DAVID T. McELHANEY H O W N O M M L A T E C P R O N I V F O I R G I R A E E A S O N I S E N L This Plan Prepared
or Approved by: Kevin J. Tankersley, ISA Certified Arborist # MA-5871A LEGEND TREE TAG NUMBER DRIPLINE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE TRUNK LOCATION 0000 EXCELLENT 80.1 - 100% GOOD 60.1 - 80% FAIR
40.1 - 60% POOR 20.1 - 40% VERY POOR / DEAD 0-20% TREE CONDITION CATEGORIES ARE PER THE GUIDE FOR PLANT APPRAISAL ,10TH EDITION, BY THE COUNCIL OF TREE AND LANDSCAPE APPRAISERS. SEE
SHEET C16-06 FOR TREE INVENTORY AND CONDITION ANALYSIS / TREE MANAGEMENT REPORT ROOT PRUNING PER DCSM ARTICLE 8.420.2 TYPICAL ROOT PRUNING DETAIL TREE TO BE REMOVED G G GG GG GG G G
G G G G HARRISON STREET SE (EX. 70' R.O.W.) TOWN BRANCH F E 12 7 6 11 38 37 21" rcp 21" rcp 42" rcp 15" rcp 41 42 39 40 24" rcp 18" rcp 24"x36" elip 24"x36" elip 35 34 1228 1229 2045
1230 1231 1232 1234 1235 1233 1243 2046 2050 1240 2051 O10 2047 2048 1236 1237 1238 1239 1242 1244 2053 1241 2052 O11 O12 O13 O14O15 O17 O18 O19 1951 1950 1946 1945 1943 1942 19441937
1941 1940 1939 1934 1936 193520551931 1932 1247 2042 2043 2044 20392040 2038 2054 2049 O16 1248 1246 1245 LOADING ENTRANCE BUILDING C BUILDING B LOADING ENTRANCE (1 LOADING SPACE AT
15'X30') (1 LOADING SPACE AT 15'X30') (NON-RESIDENTIAL) 261 Item a. ΣΘ∆∆ ΗΜΥ∆ΜΣΝΘΞ % ΒΝΜΧΗΣΗΝΜ ≅Μ≅ΚΞΡΗΡ , ΣΘ∆∆ Λ≅Μ≅ΦΛ∆ΜΣ Θ∆ΟΝΘΣ Μ.≅ Β05,/5 07/03/19 ΡΒ≅Κ∆9 ΡΓ∆∆Σ ΕΗΚ∆ Μν− Οκµµδθρ ∆µφηµδδθρ
Κµχρβοδ ≅θβγησδβσρ Κµχ Ρτθυδξνθρ Τθαµ+ Κσχ− ϖϖϖ−τθαµ,κσχ−βνλ Σδκ− 6/2−531−7/7/ ≅µµµχκδ+ Υηθφηµη 11//2 6601 Κησσκδ Θηυδθ Στθµοηϕδ TM ΟΚ≅Μ Χ≅Σ∆ No.DATEDESCRIPTION Θ∆ΥΗΡΗΝΜΡ
ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΥΗΚΚ≅Φ∆ ΣΝςΜ ΝΕ Κ∆∆ΡΑΤΘΦ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΨΟ,130/ ΨΝΜΗΜΦ Λ≅Ο ≅Λ∆ΜΧΛ∆ΜΣ Ε ∆ Μ Η Φ Μν−/11/37 Χ≅ΥΗΧ Σ− Λβ∆ΚΓ≅Μ∆Ξ Γ Ν ς Μ Ν Λ Λ Κ ≅ Σ ∆ Β Ο Θ Ν Μ Η Υ Ε Ν Η Θ Φ Η Θ ≅ ∆ ∆ ≅ Ρ Ν Μ Η Ρ ∆
Μ Κ 10/27/2021 07/03/19FIRST SUBMISSION 1 02/27/20 02/27/20SECOND SUBMISSION 2 09/25/20 09/25/20THIRD SUBMISSION 3 03/12/21 03/12/21FOURTH SUBMISSION 4 06/29/21 06/29/21FIFTH SUBMISSION
5 10/27/21FINAL PLANNING COMMISSION SET 6 10/27/21 This Plan Prepared or Approved by: Kevin J. Tankersley, ISA Certified Arborist # MA-5871A TREE MANAGEMENT NOTES: 1. ROOT PRUNING SHALL
BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WIT THE TOWN OF LEESBURG REQUIREMENTS WHERE INDICATED ON THE PLANS. 2. WHERE INVASIVE VINES ARE PRESENT ON TREES TO BE PRESERVED, THEY SHALL BE CUT AT SHOULDER
HEIGHT AND AT GROUND LEVEL. GROUND LEVEL CUTS SHALL BE TREATED IMMEDIATELY WITH HERBICIDE TO PREVENT REGROWTH. 3. TREES TO BE PRESERVED SHALL BE CROWN PRUNED TO REMOVED ANY DEAD OR
HAZARDOUS WOOD IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI A300 STANDARDS. 262 Item a. 07/03/19 ΡΒ≅Κ∆9 ΡΓ∆∆Σ ΕΗΚ∆ Μν− Οκµµδθρ ∆µφηµδδθρ Κµχρβοδ ≅θβγησδβσρ Κµχ Ρτθυδξνθρ Τθαµ+ Κσχ− ϖϖϖ−τθαµ,κσχ−βνλ
Σδκ− 6/2−531−7/7/ ≅µµµχκδ+ Υηθφηµη 11//2 6601 Κησσκδ Θηυδθ Στθµοηϕδ TM ΟΚ≅Μ Χ≅Σ∆ No.DATEDESCRIPTION Θ∆ΥΗΡΗΝΜΡ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΥΗΚΚ≅Φ∆ ΣΝςΜ ΝΕ Κ∆∆ΡΑΤΘΦ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΨΟ,130/ ΨΝΜΗΜΦ Λ≅Ο ≅Λ∆ΜΧΛ∆ΜΣ
Ε ∆ Μ Η Φ Μν−/11/37 Χ≅ΥΗΧ Σ− Λβ∆ΚΓ≅Μ∆Ξ Γ Ν ς Μ Ν Λ Λ Κ ≅ Σ ∆ Β Ο Θ Ν Μ Η Υ Ε Ν Η Θ Φ Η Θ ≅ ∆ ∆ ≅ Ρ Ν Μ Η Ρ ∆ Μ Κ 10/27/2021 07/03/19FIRST SUBMISSION 1 02/27/20 02/27/20SECOND SUBMISSION
2 09/25/20 09/25/20THIRD SUBMISSION 3 03/12/21 03/12/21FOURTH SUBMISSION 4 06/29/21 06/29/21FIFTH SUBMISSION 5 10/27/21FINAL PLANNING COMMISSION SET 6 10/27/21 ΡΗΦΓΣ ΧΗΡΣ≅ΜΒ∆ ΟΚ≅Μ ≅ΜΧ
ΟΘΝΕΗΚ∆Ρ Β06,/0 Γ9 0! < 4/&: Υ9 0! < 4& N VA. STATE GRID NORTH 330 325 315 320 310 305 300 335 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE050 50 100 50 20025 330 325 345 320 340 335
330 335 330 325 345 320 340 335 330 335 330 325 315 320 310 305 300 335 N VA. STATE GRID NORTH {\W0.8;NOTE: EXISTING VEGETATION ALONG CATOCTIN DRIVE TO BE REMOVED. SEE SHEETS L4-01
AND L4-03 FOR PROPOSED VEGETATION THAT IS OUTSIDE OF SIGHT DISTANCE LINES AND THE ASSOCIATED EASEMENTS.} 30 20 27 00 26 30 25 80 25 30 25 25 60 27 50 27 50 25 40 26 90 27 20 27 00 27
80 3140 30 80 27 50 1.4%%%324 326 326 328 330 326 324FF=330.20 FF=327.50 FF=327.50 FF=327.50 FF=326.50 FF=325.60 FF=325.30 FF=325.80 FF=326.30 FF=327.00 FF=327.80 13,400 SF ONLY ONLY
SIGHT DISTANCE ESMT SIGHT DISTANCE ESMT HIGH STREET (PRIVATE GENERAL STREET) EYE 2 EYE 1 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE G ~ asphalt ~ ~ asphalt ~ ~ asphalt ~ dig dig drive-through
canopy drive-through canopy speed bump ~ asphalt ~ conc. conc. s/w conc. s/w conc. s/w conc. s/w conc. s/w fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc roof overhang over conc. s/w ws (typ)
retaining wall bol metal hand rail co em electric box ev ev em Virginia Village sign sdmh tel ped conc. s/w vault lsalsa lsalsa lsa lsa fc fc fc fc fc gm 21 7 5 9 17 roof overhang dilapidated
structure attached to building CATOCTIN CIRCLE SE (EX. 70' R.O.W.) I.P.S. 34 332.6 331.6 331.4 330.5 330.7 330.6 328.7 329.5 329.6 326.5 329.7 327.6 328.4 328.6 325.5 327.5 326.5 328.5
326.5 327.4 327.7 327.8 326.7 325.4 326.5 326.4 325.6 325.6 324.5 324.5 323.6 324.4 324.3 323.4 322.6 328 330 326 328 330 332 326 324 (URBAN BOULEVARD) 4+00.00 5+00.00 6+00.00 7+00.00
EYE 1 315' SIGHT DISTANCE (LEFT) OBJ. 3+95.05= CATOCTIN CIRCLE SE = 3.5' HEIGHT OF EYE 3.5' HEIGHT OF EYE EYE 7+006+005+004+00 3.5' HEIGHT OF OBJ OBJ 7+05.05= CATOCTIN CIRCLE SE = 3.5'
HEIGHT OF OBJECT 335' SIGHT DISTANCE LEFT (25 MPH) EX. GRADE SIGHT DISTANCE AT ALONG { CATOCTIN CIRCLE SE EYE-1} 320 330 340 PROP. GRADE 300 310 320 330 340 300 310 320 330 340 30
20 27 00 26 30 25 80 25 30 25 25 60 27 50 27 50 25 40 26 90 27 20 12 00 12 70 12 50 12 90 27 00 27 80 3140 30 80 27 50 1.4%%%324 326 326 314 314 316 312 328 330 326 324 322 320 318
316 FF=321.70FF=322.60 FF=330.20 FF=327.50 FF=327.50 FF=327.50 FF=326.50 FF=325.60 FF=325.30 FF=325.80 FF=326.30 FF=327.00 FF=327.80 13,400 SF ONLY ONLY ONLY ONLY SIGHT DISTANCE ESMT
SIGHT DISTANCE ESMT SIGHT DISTANCE ESMT SIGHT DISTANCE ESMT \pxqr;LANDSCAPE WALL HIGH STREET (PRIVATE GENERAL STREET) EYE 2 EYE 1 EYE 3 EYE 4 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION
ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE G G G ~ asphalt ~ ~ asphalt ~ ~ asphalt ~ ~ asphalt ~ ~ asphalt ~ dig dig covered conc. s/w drive-through canopy
drive-through canopy speed bump speed bump 2R lsa 5R ~ asphalt ~ ~ asphalt ~ ssmh ssmh sdmh sdmh sdmh sdmh sdmh Wells Fargo sign ssmh conc. electric box on conc. pad comcast boxes within
fence bol bol 5.0'x8.4' brick A.T.M. overhang 2Rwm conc. s/w conc. s/w conc. s/w conc. s/w conc. s/w bol conc. s/w conc. s/w conc. s/w conc. s/w fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc gv fc fc fc roof overhang over conc. s/w ws (typ) a/c units electric boxes retaining wall bol metal hand rail co em electric box 3 bol gm 2 wm 2R 2R bolwm
wm gm ev ev em Virginia Village sign sdmh tel ped conc. communica tions vault gv conc. s/w 6' chain link fence vault lsalsa lsalsa lsa lsa lsa fc fc fc fc fc gm 6' chain link fence
fc fc fc 21 7 5 9 17 17 11 6 5 23 5 10 20 27 roof overhang roof overhang dilapi dated struc ture attac hed to buildi CATOCTIN CIRCLE SE PIN # 231-18-5606 OURS LAND TRUST SUBDIVISION
LOT 1 (EX. 70' R.O.W.) I.P.S. 34 334.2 334.6 333.5 333.7 333.7 332.5 331.5 332.8 329.4 332.6 332.6 331.8 327.3 ~ asphalt ~ 331.6 331.4 330.5 330.7 330.6 328.7 329.5 329.6 326.5 329.7
327.6 328.4 328.6 325.5 327.5 326.5 328.5 326.5 327.4 327.7 327.8 326.7 325.4 326.5 326.4 325.6 325.6 324.5 324.5 323.6 324.4 324.3 323.5 323.4 322.4 322.6 322.6 321.6 320.7 321.5 320.4
320.5 320.5 319.7 318.5 319.3 319.6 318.6 317.3 317.6 317.6 318.6 318.1 318.5 316.5 317.6 316.4 315.5 318.4 315.5 317.4 314.6 313.6 313.5 312.6 311.6R2 \pxt1;320 328 330 326 328 330
334 332 326 324 322 318 316 314 312 320 318 316 (URBAN BOULEVARD) 2+00.00 3+00.00 4+00.00 5+00.00 6+00.00 7+00.00 8+00.00 9+00.00 10+00.00 11+00.00 12+00.00 OBJ. EYE 2 335' SIGHT DISTANCE
(RIGHT) OBJ.315' SIGHT DISTANCE (LEFT) 9+008+007+006+005+00 5+004+003+002+00 10+00 3+19.00= CATOCTIN CIRCLE SE = 3.5' HEIGHT OF EYE 2+84.00= CATOCTIN CIRCLE SE = 3.5' HEIGHT OF OBJECT
9+26.00= CATOCTIN CIRCLE SE = 3.5' HEIGHT OF OBJECT 310 320 330 340 310 320 330 340 320 320 320 3.5' HEIGHT OF EYE EYE 3.5' HEIGHT OF OBJ OBJ 3.5' HEIGHT OF OBJ OBJ 315' SIGHT DISTANCE
LEFT (25 MPH) 335' SIGHT DISTANCE RIGHT (25 MPH) SIGHT DISTANCE AT ALONG { CATOCTIN CIRCLE SE EYE-2} EX. GRADE PROP. GRADE 263 Item a. 07/03/19 ΡΒ≅Κ∆9 ΡΓ∆∆Σ ΕΗΚ∆ Μν− Οκµµδθρ ∆µφηµδδθρ
Κµχρβοδ ≅θβγησδβσρ Κµχ Ρτθυδξνθρ Τθαµ+ Κσχ− ϖϖϖ−τθαµ,κσχ−βνλ Σδκ− 6/2−531−7/7/ ≅µµµχκδ+ Υηθφηµη 11//2 6601 Κησσκδ Θηυδθ Στθµοηϕδ TM ΟΚ≅Μ Χ≅Σ∆ No.DATEDESCRIPTION Θ∆ΥΗΡΗΝΜΡ
ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΥΗΚΚ≅Φ∆ ΣΝςΜ ΝΕ Κ∆∆ΡΑΤΘΦ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΨΟ,130/ ΨΝΜΗΜΦ Λ≅Ο ≅Λ∆ΜΧΛ∆ΜΣ Ε ∆ Μ Η Φ Μν−/11/37 Χ≅ΥΗΧ Σ− Λβ∆ΚΓ≅Μ∆Ξ Γ Ν ς Μ Ν Λ Λ Κ ≅ Σ ∆ Β Ο Θ Ν Μ Η Υ Ε Ν Η Θ Φ Η Θ ≅ ∆ ∆ ≅ Ρ Ν Μ Η Ρ ∆
Μ Κ 10/27/2021 07/03/19FIRST SUBMISSION 1 02/27/20 02/27/20SECOND SUBMISSION 2 09/25/20 09/25/20THIRD SUBMISSION 3 03/12/21 03/12/21FOURTH SUBMISSION 4 06/29/21 06/29/21FIFTH SUBMISSION
5 10/27/21FINAL PLANNING COMMISSION SET 6 10/27/21 ΡΗΦΓΣ ΧΗΡΣ≅ΜΒ∆ ΟΚ≅Μ ≅ΜΧ ΟΘΝΕΗΚ∆Ρ Β06,/1 Γ9 0! < 4/&: Υ9 0! < 4& N VA. STATE GRID NORTH 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE050
50 100 50 20025 320 315 305 310 300 295 290 285 320 315 305 310 300 295 290 285 320 315 305 310 300 295 290 285 320 315 305 310 300 295 290 285 N VA. STATE GRID NORTH {\W0.8;NOTE: EXISTING
VEGETATION ALONG CATOCTIN DRIVE TO BE REMOVED. SEE SHEETS L4-01 AND L4-03 FOR PROPOSED VEGETATION THAT IS OUTSIDE OF SIGHT DISTANCE LINES AND THE ASSOCIATED EASEMENTS.} 12 00 12 70
12 50 12 90 07 60 08 40 318 316 314 314 316 318 308 310 312 322 320 318 316 FF=321.70 FF=322.60 FF=327.50 FF=327.50 FF=326.50 13,400 SF ONLY ONLY ONLY ONLY SIGHT DISTANCE ESMT SIGHT
DISTANCE ESMT SIGHT DISTANCE ESMT SIGHT DISTANCE ESMT \pxqr;LANDSCAPE WALL EYE 5 EYE 3 EYE 4 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE GGGGGG G ~ asphalt ~ ep
~ asphalt ~ ssmh covered conc. s/w drive-through canopy speed bump lsa lsa lsa 2R lsa 5R ~ asphalt ~ ssmh ssmh ssmh sdmh sdmh sdmh sdmh sdmh sdmh sdmh sdmh sdmh Wells Fargo sign ssmh
asphalt trail riprap conc. end wall tmh conc. end wall co 7 gm a/c unit co conc. conc. fdc a/c units electric boxes wm wm electric box on conc. pad comcast boxes within fencebol bol
5.0'x8.4' brick A.T.M. overhang 2R wm conc. s/w conc. s/w conc. s/w conc. s/w bol fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc a/c unitselectric boxes tel ped conc. conc. communications vault lsa
lsa fc fc fc fc fc 17 11 6 5 23 5 12 10 20 23 26 4' metal barrier roof overhang PIN # 231-18-5606 OURS LAND TRUST SUBDIVISION LOT 1 CATOCTIN CIRCLE (EX. 70' R.O.W.) I.P.S. I.P.S. ~
asphalt ~ conc. 323.5 322.4 322.6 321.6 320.7 320.4 320.5 320.5 319.7 318.5 319.3 319.6 318.6 317.3 317.6 317.6 318.6 318.1 318.5 316.5 317.6 316.4 315.5 318.4 315.5 317.4 314.6 313.6
313.5 312.6 311.6 311.5 310.5 309.3 309.5 308.5 308.6 308.3 309.5 307.6 294.5 306.3 305.4 304.5 296.8 300.3 303.5\pxt1;320 308 310 314 312 322 318 316 314 312 310 306 304 320 318 316
300 298 300 298\pxqc;50' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;150' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER (URBAN BOULEVARD) 8+00.00 9+00.00 10+00.00 11+00.00 12+00.00 13+00.00 14+00.00 15+00.00 15+31.37 OBJ. 335'
SIGHT DISTANCE (RIGHT) OBJ. 315' SIGHT DISTANCE (LEFT)EYE 4 12 00 12 70 12 50 12 90 318 316 314 314 316 318 312 322 320 318 316 FF=321.70 FF=322.60 FF=327.50 FF=327.50 FF=326.50 13,400
SF ONLY ONLY SIGHT DISTANCE ESMT SIGHT DISTANCE ESMT \pxqr;LANDSCAPE WALL EYE 3 EYE 4 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE ~ asphalt ~ covered conc. s/w
drive-through canopy speed bump lsa lsa lsa 2R lsa 5R ~ asphalt ~ ssmh ssmh sdmh sdmh sdmh sdmh sdmh Wells Fargo sign ssmh electric box on conc. pad comcast boxes within fencebol bol
5.0'x8.4' brick A.T.M. overhang 2R wm conc. s/w conc. s/w conc. s/w conc. s/w bol fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc a/c unitselectric boxes tel ped conc. conc. communications vault lsa lsa
fc fc fc fc fc 17 11 6 5 23 5 10 20 23 26roof overhang PIN # 231-18-5606 OURS LAND TRUST SUBDIVISION LOT 1 ~ asphalt ~ 323.5 322.4 322.6 321.6 320.7 320.4 320.5 320.5 319.7 318.5 319.3
319.6 318.6 317.3 317.6 317.6 318.6 318.1 318.5 316.5 317.6 316.4 315.5 318.4 315.5 317.4 314.6 313.6 313.5 312.6\pxt1;320322 318 316 314 312 320 318 316 8+00.00 9+00.00 10+00.00 11+00.00
12+00.00 EYE 3 OBJ.315' SIGHT DISTANCE (LEFT) 10+0009+008+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 11+82.00= CATOCTIN CIRCLE SE = 3.5' HEIGHT OF EYE 3.5' HEIGHT OF EYE EYE 310 300 290
320 3.5' HEIGHT OF OBJ OBJ 3.5' HEIGHT OF OBJ OBJ 310 300 290 320 310 300 290 320 310 300 290 320 8+47.00= CATOCTIN CIRCLE SE = 3.5' HEIGHT OF OBJECT 14+91.00= CATOCTIN CIRCLE SE =
3.5' HEIGHT OF OBJECT SIGHT DISTANCE AT ALONG { CATOCTIN CIRCLE SE EYE-4} 315' SIGHT DISTANCE LEFT (25 MPH) 335' SIGHT DISTANCE LEFT (25 MPH) EX. GRADE PROP. GRADE 10+0009+00 11+00
12+00 8+68.00= CATOCTIN CIRCLE SE = 3.5' HEIGHT OF EYE 11+74.00= CATOCTIN CIRCLE SE = 3.5' HEIGHT OF OBJECT 335' SIGHT DISTANCE LEFT (25 MPH) EX. GRADE SIGHT DISTANCE AT ALONG { CATOCTIN
CIRCLE SE EYE-3} 3.5' HEIGHT OF EYE EYE 3.5' HEIGHT OF OBJ OBJ PROP. GRADE 310 300 290 320 310 300 290 320 310 300 290 320 264 Item a. 07/03/19 ΡΒ≅Κ∆9 ΡΓ∆∆Σ ΕΗΚ∆ Μν− Οκµµδθρ ∆µφηµδδθρ
Κµχρβοδ ≅θβγησδβσρ Κµχ Ρτθυδξνθρ Τθαµ+ Κσχ− ϖϖϖ−τθαµ,κσχ−βνλ Σδκ− 6/2−531−7/7/ ≅µµµχκδ+ Υηθφηµη 11//2 6601 Κησσκδ Θηυδθ Στθµοηϕδ TM ΟΚ≅Μ Χ≅Σ∆ No.DATEDESCRIPTION Θ∆ΥΗΡΗΝΜΡ
ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΥΗΚΚ≅Φ∆ ΣΝςΜ ΝΕ Κ∆∆ΡΑΤΘΦ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΨΟ,130/ ΨΝΜΗΜΦ Λ≅Ο ≅Λ∆ΜΧΛ∆ΜΣ Ε ∆ Μ Η Φ Μν−/11/37 Χ≅ΥΗΧ Σ− Λβ∆ΚΓ≅Μ∆Ξ Γ Ν ς Μ Ν Λ Λ Κ ≅ Σ ∆ Β Ο Θ Ν Μ Η Υ Ε Ν Η Θ Φ Η Θ ≅ ∆ ∆ ≅ Ρ Ν Μ Η Ρ ∆
Μ Κ 10/27/2021 07/03/19FIRST SUBMISSION 1 02/27/20 02/27/20SECOND SUBMISSION 2 09/25/20 09/25/20THIRD SUBMISSION 3 03/12/21 03/12/21FOURTH SUBMISSION 4 06/29/21 06/29/21FIFTH SUBMISSION
5 10/27/21FINAL PLANNING COMMISSION SET 6 10/27/21 ΡΗΦΓΣ ΧΗΡΣ≅ΜΒ∆ ΟΚ≅Μ ≅ΜΧ ΟΘΝΕΗΚ∆Ρ Β06,/2 Γ9 0! < 4/&: Υ9 0! < 4& 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE050 50 100 50 20025 N VA.
STATE GRID NORTH 300 295 285 290 280 275 270 265 305 310 300 295 285 290 280 275 270 265 305 310 {\W0.8;NOTE: EXISTING VEGETATION ALONG CATOCTIN DRIVE TO BE REMOVED. SEE SHEETS L4-01
AND L4-03 FOR PROPOSED VEGETATION THAT IS OUTSIDE OF SIGHT DISTANCE LINES AND THE ASSOCIATED EASEMENTS.} 07 60 08 40 308 ONLY ONLY SIGHT DISTANCE ESMTEYE 5 ep ssmh sdmh sdmh sdmh asphalt
trail riprap conc. end wall tmh conc. end wall conc. a/c units 12 I.P.S. I.P.S. 309.3 309.5 308.5 308.6 308.3 309.5 307.6 294.5 306.3 305.4 304.5 296.8 300.3 303.5 300.8 301.7 302.5
302.0 301.2 301.1 301.6 308 310 314 312 306 304 302 300 298 300 298\pxqc;50' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER \pxqc;150' CREEK VALLEY BUFFER 13+00.00 14+00.00 15+00.00 15+31.37 EYE 5 315' SIGHT
DISTANCE (LEFT) OBJ. 13+44.00= CATOCTIN CIRCLE SE = 3.5' HEIGHT OF EYE \pxt4;16+59.00= CATOCTIN CIRCLE SE = 3.5' HEIGHT OF OBJECT 315' SIGHT DISTANCE LEFT (25 MPH) SIGHT DISTANCE AT
ALONG { CATOCTIN CIRCLE SE EYE-5} 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 310 300 290 280 3.5' HEIGHT OF EYE EYE 3.5' HEIGHT OF OBJ OBJ EX. GRADE PROP. GRADE 270 265 320 310 300 290 280 270 265 320
265 Item a. 07/03/19 ΡΒ≅Κ∆9 ΡΓ∆∆Σ ΕΗΚ∆ Μν− Οκµµδθρ ∆µφηµδδθρ Κµχρβοδ ≅θβγησδβσρ Κµχ Ρτθυδξνθρ Τθαµ+ Κσχ− ϖϖϖ−τθαµ,κσχ−βνλ Σδκ− 6/2−531−7/7/ ≅µµµχκδ+ Υηθφηµη 11//2 6601 Κησσκδ
Θηυδθ Στθµοηϕδ TM ΟΚ≅Μ Χ≅Σ∆ No.DATEDESCRIPTION Θ∆ΥΗΡΗΝΜΡ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΥΗΚΚ≅Φ∆ ΣΝςΜ ΝΕ Κ∆∆ΡΑΤΘΦ ΥΗΘΦΗΜΗ≅ ΨΟ,130/ ΨΝΜΗΜΦ Λ≅Ο ≅Λ∆ΜΧΛ∆ΜΣ Ε ∆ Μ Η Φ Μν−/11/37 Χ≅ΥΗΧ Σ− Λβ∆ΚΓ≅Μ∆Ξ Γ Ν ς Μ Ν Λ Λ
Κ ≅ Σ ∆ Β Ο Θ Ν Μ Η Υ Ε Ν Η Θ Φ Η Θ ≅ ∆ ∆ ≅ Ρ Ν Μ Η Ρ ∆ Μ Κ 10/27/2021 07/03/19FIRST SUBMISSION 1 02/27/20 02/27/20SECOND SUBMISSION 2 09/25/20 09/25/20THIRD SUBMISSION 3 03/12/21 03/12/21FOURTH
SUBMISSION 4 06/29/21 06/29/21FIFTH SUBMISSION 5 10/27/21FINAL PLANNING COMMISSION SET 6 10/27/21 ΡΟ∆ΒΗ≅Κ ∆ΩΒ∆ΟΣΗΝΜ Β07,/0 0&<2/& 1 inch = ft. ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE030 30 60
30 12015 N VA. STATE GRID NORTH \pxql;{\W1;FINAL BRIDGE ALIGNMENT, PIER LOCATIONS, AND ABUTMENTS SHOWN SHALL BE IN SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE WITH THIS CONCEPT PLAN WITH REASONABLE ALLOWANCES
TO BE MADE FOR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN ALTERATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH TOWN ZONING, SUBDIVISION, AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. MODIFICATIONS MAY ALSO BE NECESSARY AS DETERMINED THROUGH
THE FLOODPLAIN STUDY AND LOMR PROCESS.} PROPERTY LINE %%ULEGEND LOC PROP. CLEARING & GRADING LIMITS DISTURBANCE WITHIN THE FLOODPLAIN FLOODPLAIN LINE G G GG G G G G G G GGGG GGG HARRISON
STREET SE N 59°34'51" E 323.58' S 08°13'41" E 616.79' C1 S 47°54'41" W 42.48' S 72°49'09" W 52.79' S 78°42'55" W 68.72' C6 (EX. 70' R.O.W.) FEMA REGULATORY FLOODWAY REGULATORY FLOODWAY
(SEE NOTE 5) S 08°13'41" E 616.79' NO PARKING NO PARKING S 10°41'54" E 2.26' S 78°42'25" E 4.92' N 10°52'32" E 7.66' TOWN BRANCH FEMA REGULATORY FLOODWAY & FEMA REGULATORY FLOODWAY
& FEMA ZONE "X" (SEE NOTE 5) S 66°00'35" E 415.54' I.P.S. I.P.S. FEMA ZONE "X" (SEE NOTE 5) LINE PER D.B. 708 PG.37 8" SAN SEW 8" SAN SEW 8" SAN SEW 302 304 306 306 308 310 300 308
310 316 314 312 310 314 318 320 322 304 320 316 314 312 310 308 300 298 300 298 300 298 306 304 302 300 \pxqc;FLOODPLAN OVERLAY DISTRICT \pxqc;FLOODPLAN OVERLAY DISTRICT \pxqc;FLOODPLAN
OVERLAY DISTRICT PIN # 231-18-6244 MADISON HOUSE ASSOCIATES II LP INSTR. # 15+00.00 15+31.37 07 60 08 40 19 40 19 40 18 80 19 40 22 35 22 03 22 20 23 0023 00 322 320 318 316 320 316
318 308 20 00 322 LOC LOC LOC LOC FF=322.40 FF=320.00 FF=318.80 BRIDGE 22 40 22 40 22 40 21 80 17 70 320 318 316 314 TW=315.80 BW=311.20 TW=315.80 BW=311.00 TW=317.70 BW=304.50 TW=322.20
BW=322.20 TW=317.70 BW=305.00TW=321.20 BW=320.70 304 306 308 310 312 TW=319.40 BW=303.50 TW=319.40 BW=304.00 TW=319.40 BW=304.00 04 10 {\W0.75;STAIRS} FF=322.40 \pxqr;POSSIBLE APPROX.
ALTERNATE LIMITS OF CLEARING AND GRADING FOR EXCAVATION IN THE FLOODPLAIN TO MITIGATE RISE IN THE FLOODPLAIN WATER SURFACE ELEVATION IF NECESSARY. {OURS OVERLOOK} (SEE L SERIES SHEETS
FOR 310 06 30 RAMP LOC 1733 1783 1583 322 318 320 320 318 PIER 99 00 02 30 RAMP PIER RAISED PLATFORM ABUTMENT LOC LOC LOC R=15' R=14' R=15' R=7.5' R=113' R=87' R=10' R=6' R=6' R=10'
R=40' R=40' 22 20 EYE 5 THE APPLICANT UNDERSTANDS THAT ANY CHANGES TO THE FLOODPLAIN OR CHANNEL, NOT SHOWN ON THIS REZONING AND SPECIAL EXCEPTION APPLICATION, AS WELL AS ANYTHING THAT
MAY CAUSE A RISE IN THE FLOODPLAIN ON THIS OR ANY ADJACENT PROPERTIES WILL REQUIRE A NEW SPECIAL EXCEPTION PLAN, WHICH WILL INCLUDE ADDITIONAL MEETINGS WITH THE TOWN COUNCIL AND PLANNING
COMMISSION HEARINGS. PROP. SCREEN WALL 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE 4 FT. PROJECTION ZONE \pxqr;{\W1;A DCSM MODIFICATION WILL BE SUBMITTED AT TIME OF FINAL SITE PLAN
TO ALLOW THE PIPE TO DAYLIGHT THROUGH RETAINING WALL. FINAL WALL DESIGN WILL INCLUDE MEASURES IDENTIFIED IN THE REQUEST AND APPROVAL OF THE DCSM MODIFICATION. } \pxqr;{\W1;IMPACTS
TO THE FLOODPLAIN WILL NOT RAISE THE FLOODPLAIN ELEVATION AT THE UPSTREAM PROPERTY LINE.} 266 Item a. SEAL SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE LANDDESIGN PROJ.# SCALE PROJECT NORTH NO. DESCRIPTION
DATE REVISION / ISSUANCE ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE: 24" X 36" NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION VERT: HORZ: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: 200 S. PEYTON STREET ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314 703.549.7784 WWW.LANDDESIGN.COM
1 07.03.2019 ZMA 2 02.27.2020 ZMA 2ND SUB 3 09.25.2020 ZMA 3RD SUB 4 03.12.2021 ZMA 4TH SUB 5 06.29.2021 ZMA 5TH SUB 6 10.27.2021 ZMA 6TH SUB (NOT TO SCALE) NTS VIRGINIA VILLAGE KEANE
ENTERPRISES 44031 PIPELINE PLAZA, SUITE 100 ASHBURN, VA 20147 2018138 CONTEXT PLAN N/A KG, JG AN, SH JG L0-0110/26/2021 1:40 PM JOE GIANGRANDI G:\2018\2018138\CAD\EXHIBITS\ZONING
PLANS\ZMA\8138 - CNTX_ILLST.DWG 267 Item a. SEAL SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE LANDDESIGN PROJ.# SCALE PROJECT NORTH NO. DESCRIPTION DATE REVISION / ISSUANCE ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE: 24" X 36"
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION VERT: HORZ: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: 200 S. PEYTON STREET ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314 703.549.7784 WWW.LANDDESIGN.COM 1 07.03.2019 ZMA 2 02.27.2020 ZMA 2ND SUB
3 09.25.2020 ZMA 3RD SUB 4 03.12.2021 ZMA 4TH SUB 5 06.29.2021 ZMA 5TH SUB 6 10.27.2021 ZMA 6TH SUB VIRGINIA VILLAGE KEANE ENTERPRISES 44031 PIPELINE PLAZA, SUITE 100 ASHBURN, VA 20147
2018138 CONTEXTUAL CONCEPT N/A KG, JG AN, SH JG L0-0210/26/2021 1:40 PM JOE GIANGRANDI G:\2018\2018138\CAD\EXHIBITS\ZONING PLANS\ZMA\8138 - CNTX_ILLST.DWG (NOT TO SCALE) NTS MAIN
ROAD WAYS CONTEXT CREATE A LOOP WITH DOWNTOWN CREATE THE SITE IS APPROX. A 10 WALK FROM TOWN HALL AND A 5 MIN WALK FROM THE W&O.D. TRAIL. CREATE A LOOP WITH DOWNTOWN. THE APPLICANT
DESIRE FOR THE SITE IS TO ENSURE THAT THE SITE HAS A CONNECTION TO HISTORIC LEESBURG, BOTH FROM A CONTEXTUAL VERNACULAR AND ALSO BY CREATING A LOOP CONNECTION IN THE PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION
THROUGH THE SITE. CONNECTIONS ONE OF THE MAIN GOALS OF THE PROJECT IS TO CREATE CONNECTIONS. THOSE CONNECTIONS ARE: x PLACE TO PLACE x PEOPLE TO PLACE x PEOPLE TO PEOPLE THIS GOAL IS
REINFORCED BY THE CONCEPTUAL LOOP WITH DOWNTOWN. IT GIVES TO CONNECTIONS TO AND FROM DOWNTOWN, CRESCENT PLACE, RAFLO PARK, W&O.D. TRAIL, AMONG OTHERS. CREATE CONNECTIONS NODES CONNECTION
WITH DOWNTOWN, TOWN BRANCH, AND W&O.D. TRAIL CONNECT NODES CONNECTION NODES ALONG THE CONCEPTUAL LOOP HELP TO REINFORCE THE DESIRE TO MOVE IN THE SITE, THROUGH THE SITE, AND FINALLY
BACK UP INTO DOWNTOWN. CONCEPTUAL LOOP NODES CONNECTION INTO SITE NODES CONNECTION RAFLO PARK, CRESCENT PLACE NODES CONNECTION WITH DOWNTOWN, TOWN BRANCH, AND W&O.D. TRAIL CONVEYANCE
VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN CONVEYANCE ARE INFORMED BY EXISTING CONNECTIONS AND ARE FURTHER REINFORCED BY THE CONCEPTUAL LOOP. ORGANIZATION THE ORGANIZATION IS FINALIZED BY THE LOCATION
OF THE PARK SPACES. THESE AREAS ARE TO REINFORCE THE CONNECTION OF PEOPLE TO PEOPLE. MAINTAIN A PEDESTRIAN CONVEYANCE AND CONNECTION VEHICULAR CONVEYANCE CONNECTS TO EXITING ROAD WAYS
PARK SPACES CREATE SENSE OF PLACE AND CONNECTION TO USES 268 Item a. VIRGINIA VILLAGE KEANE ENTERPRISES 44031 PIPELINE PLAZA, SUITE 100 ASHBURN, VA 20147 2018138 ILLUSTRATIVE PLAN N/A
KG, JG AN, SH JG L0-0310/26/2021 1:40 PM JOE GIANGRANDI G:\2018\2018138\CAD\EXHIBITS\ZONING PLANS\ZMA\8138 - CNTX_ILLST.DWG 0 1"=60' 30' 60' 120' SEAL SHEET NUMBER
SHEET TITLE LANDDESIGN PROJ.# SCALE PROJECT NORTH NO. DESCRIPTION DATE REVISION / ISSUANCE ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE: 24" X 36" NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION VERT: HORZ: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED
BY: 200 S. PEYTON STREET ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314 703.549.7784 WWW.LANDDESIGN.COM 1 07.03.2019 ZMA 2 02.27.2020 ZMA 2ND SUB 3 09.25.2020 ZMA 3RD SUB 4 03.12.2021 ZMA 4TH SUB 5 06.29.2021
ZMA 5TH SUB 6 10.27.2021 ZMA 6TH SUB OURS OVERLOOK HIGH STREET PARK COMMON GREEN FAIRFAX STREET SE FAIRFAX STREET SE TOWN BRANCH STREAM HARRISON STREET HIGH STREET MADISON CT MADISON
CT SOUTH KING STREET RITE AID CATOCTIN CIRCLE CATOCTIN CIRCLE RAFLO PARK MADISON HOUSE AUTO DEALER CRESCENT PLACE BARBER BLDG 'B' BLDG 'F' BLDG 'E' BLDG 'D' BLDG 'A' BLDG 'C' MADISON
CT PRIVATE ROAD "D" PRIVATE ROAD "B" PRIVATE ROAD "A" PRIVATE ROAD "A" PRIVATE ROAD "C" FAIRFAX STREET SE FAIRFAX STREET SE TOWN BRANCH STREAM HARRISON STREET HIGH STREET MADISON CT
MADISON CT SOUTH KING STREET RITE AID CATOCTIN CIRCLE CATOCTIN CIRCLE RAFLO PARK MADISON HOUSE AUTO DEALER CRESCENT PLACE BARBER BLDG 'B' BLDG 'F' BLDG 'E' BLDG 'D' BLDG 'A' BLDG 'C'
MADISON CT PRIVATE ROAD "D" PRIVATE ROAD "B" PRIVATE ROAD "A" PRIVATE ROAD "A" PRIVATE ROAD "C" ENTRY PARK 269 Item a. VIRGINIA VILLAGE KEANE ENTERPRISES 44031 PIPELINE PLAZA, SUITE
100 ASHBURN, VA 20147 2018138 BIRDS EYE VIEWS N/A KG, JG AN, SH JG L0-0410/26/2021 1:40 PM JOE GIANGRANDI G:\2018\2018138\CAD\EXHIBITS\ZONING PLANS\ZMA\8138 - CNTX_ILLST.DWG SEAL
SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE LANDDESIGN PROJ.# SCALE PROJECT NORTH NO. DESCRIPTION DATE REVISION / ISSUANCE ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE: 24" X 36" NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION VERT: HORZ: CHECKED BY: DRAWN
BY: DESIGNED BY: 200 S. PEYTON STREET ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314 703.549.7784 WWW.LANDDESIGN.COM 1 07.03.2019 ZMA 2 02.27.2020 ZMA 2ND SUB 3 09.25.2020 ZMA 3RD SUB 4 03.12.2021 ZMA 4TH SUB
5 06.29.2021 ZMA 5TH SUB 6 10.27.2021 ZMA 6TH SUB BIRD'S EYE View looking North BIRD'S EYE View looking South 270 Item a. SEAL SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE LANDDESIGN PROJ.# SCALE PROJECT
NORTH NO. DESCRIPTION DATE REVISION / ISSUANCE ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE: 24" X 36" NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION VERT: HORZ: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: 200 S. PEYTON STREET ALEXANDRIA, VA
22314 703.549.7784 WWW.LANDDESIGN.COM 1 07.03.2019 ZMA 2 02.27.2020 ZMA 2ND SUB 3 09.25.2020 ZMA 3RD SUB 4 03.12.2021 ZMA 4TH SUB 5 06.29.2021 ZMA 5TH SUB 6 10.27.2021 ZMA 6TH SUB 0
1"=60' 30' 60' 120' VIRGINIA VILLAGE KEANE ENTERPRISES 44031 PIPELINE PLAZA, SUITE 100 ASHBURN, VA 20147 2018138 PARKS OVERVIEW N/A KG, JG AN, SH ########## L1-0110/26/2021
1:40 PM JOE GIANGRANDI G:\2018\2018138\CAD\EXHIBITS\ZONING PLANS\ZMA\8138 - PLN - PARK.DWG OURS OVERLOOK HIGH STREET PARK COMMON GREEN FAIRFAX STREET SE FAIRFAX STREET SE TOWN
BRANCH STREAM HARRISON STREET HIGH STREET MADISON CT MADISON CT SOUTH KING STREET RITE AID CATOCTIN CIRCLE CATOCTIN CIRCLE RAFLO PARK MADISON HOUSE AUTO DEALER CRESCENT PLACE BARBER
BLDG 'B' BLDG 'F' BLDG 'E' BLDG 'D' BLDG 'A' BLDG 'C' MADISON CT PRIVATE ROAD "D" PRIVATE ROAD "B" PRIVATE ROAD "A" PRIVATE ROAD "A" PRIVATE ROAD "C" ENTRY PARK 271 Item a. SEAL SHEET
NUMBER SHEET TITLE LANDDESIGN PROJ.# SCALE PROJECT NORTH NO. DESCRIPTION DATE REVISION / ISSUANCE ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE: 24" X 36" NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION VERT: HORZ: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY:
DESIGNED BY: 200 S. PEYTON STREET ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314 703.549.7784 WWW.LANDDESIGN.COM 1 07.03.2019 ZMA 2 02.27.2020 ZMA 2ND SUB 3 09.25.2020 ZMA 3RD SUB 4 03.12.2021 ZMA 4TH SUB 5
06.29.2021 ZMA 5TH SUB 6 10.27.2021 ZMA 6TH SUB VIRGINIA VILLAGE KEANE ENTERPRISES 44031 PIPELINE PLAZA, SUITE 100 ASHBURN, VA 20147 2018138 PARK ENLARGEMENT - OURS OVERLOOK N/A KG,
JG AN, SH ########## L1-0210/26/2021 1:40 PM JOE GIANGRANDI G:\2018\2018138\CAD\EXHIBITS\ZONING PLANS\ZMA\8138 - PLN - PARK.DWG N/A 272 Item a. VIRGINIA VILLAGE KEANE ENTERPRISES
44031 PIPELINE PLAZA, SUITE 100 ASHBURN, VA 20147 2018138 PARK ENLARGEMENT - HIGH STREET PARK N/A KG, JG AN, SH ########## L1-0310/26/2021 1:41 PM JOE GIANGRANDI G:\2018\2018138\CAD\EXHIBITS\Z
ONING PLANS\ZMA\8138 - PLN - PARK.DWG N/A SEAL SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE LANDDESIGN PROJ.# SCALE PROJECT NORTH NO. DESCRIPTION DATE REVISION / ISSUANCE ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE: 24" X 36"
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION VERT: HORZ: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: 200 S. PEYTON STREET ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314 703.549.7784 WWW.LANDDESIGN.COM 1 07.03.2019 ZMA 2 02.27.2020 ZMA 2ND SUB
3 09.25.2020 ZMA 3RD SUB 4 03.12.2021 ZMA 4TH SUB 5 06.29.2021 ZMA 5TH SUB 6 10.27.2021 ZMA 6TH SUB 273 Item a. VIRGINIA VILLAGE KEANE ENTERPRISES 44031 PIPELINE PLAZA, SUITE 100 ASHBURN,
VA 20147 2018138 PARK ENLARGEMENT COMMON GREEN N/A KG, JG AN, SH ########## L1-0410/26/2021 1:41 PM JOE GIANGRANDI G:\2018\2018138\CAD\EXHIBITS\ZONING PLANS\ZMA\8138 - PLN - PARK.DWG
N/A SEAL SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE LANDDESIGN PROJ.# SCALE PROJECT NORTH NO. DESCRIPTION DATE REVISION / ISSUANCE ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE: 24" X 36" NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION VERT: HORZ: CHECKED
BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: 200 S. PEYTON STREET ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314 703.549.7784 WWW.LANDDESIGN.COM 1 07.03.2019 ZMA 2 02.27.2020 ZMA 2ND SUB 3 09.25.2020 ZMA 3RD SUB 4 03.12.2021
ZMA 4TH SUB 5 06.29.2021 ZMA 5TH SUB 6 10.27.2021 ZMA 6TH SUB 274 Item a. VIRGINIA VILLAGE KEANE ENTERPRISES 44031 PIPELINE PLAZA, SUITE 100 ASHBURN, VA 20147 2018138 PARK ENLARGEMENT
ENTRY PARK N/A KG, JG AN, SH ########## L1-0510/26/2021 1:41 PM JOE GIANGRANDI G:\2018\2018138\CAD\EXHIBITS\ZONING PLANS\ZMA\8138 - PLN - PARK.DWG N/A SEAL SHEET NUMBER SHEET
TITLE LANDDESIGN PROJ.# SCALE PROJECT NORTH NO. DESCRIPTION DATE REVISION / ISSUANCE ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE: 24" X 36" NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION VERT: HORZ: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY:
200 S. PEYTON STREET ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314 703.549.7784 WWW.LANDDESIGN.COM 1 07.03.2019 ZMA 2 02.27.2020 ZMA 2ND SUB 3 09.25.2020 ZMA 3RD SUB 4 03.12.2021 ZMA 4TH SUB 5 06.29.2021 ZMA
5TH SUB 6 10.27.2021 ZMA 6TH SUB 275 Item a. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 1 23 24 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
51 52 53 22 VIRGINIA VILLAGE KEANE ENTERPRISES 44031 PIPELINE PLAZA, SUITE 100 ASHBURN, VA 20147 2018138 OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS N/A KG, JG AN, SH JG, SH, AN L1-0610/26/2021 1:41 PM
JOE GIANGRANDI G:\2018\2018138\CAD\EXHIBITS\ZONING PLANS\ZMA\8138 - PLN - AREA - CALCS_ALT B.DWG 0 1"=60' 30' 60' 120' SEAL SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE LANDDESIGN PROJ.#
SCALE PROJECT NORTH NO. DESCRIPTION DATE REVISION / ISSUANCE ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE: 24" X 36" NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION VERT: HORZ: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: 200 S. PEYTON STREET
ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314 703.549.7784 WWW.LANDDESIGN.COM 1 07.03.2019 ZMA 2 02.27.2020 ZMA 2ND SUB 3 09.25.2020 ZMA 3RD SUB 4 03.12.2021 ZMA 4TH SUB 5 06.29.2021 ZMA 5TH SUB 6 10.27.2021
ZMA 6TH SUB SYMBOL NOTES 1 - USEABLE OPEN SPACE TOWNHOUSE MEWS 1 2 - USEABLE OPEN SPACE TOWNHOUSE MEWS 2 3 - USEABLE OPEN SPACE TOWN BRANCH OPEN SPACE A - AMENITY SPACE ENTRY PARK B
- AMENITY SPACE COMMON GREEN C - AMENITY SPACE HIGH STREET PARK D - AMENITY SPACE OURS OVERLOOK OPEN SPACE TYPES 1 2 3 3 A B C D 1 2 3 A B C FAIRFAX STREET SE FAIRFAX STREET SE TOWN
BRANCH STREAM HARRISON STREET HIGH STREET MADISON CT MADISON CT SOUTH KING STREET RITE AID CATOCTIN CIRCLE CATOCTIN CIRCLE RAFLO PARK MADISON HOUSE AUTO DEALER CRESCENT PLACE BARBER
BLDG 'B' BLDG 'F' BLDG 'E' BLDG 'D' BLDG 'A' BLDG 'C' MADISON CT PRIVATE ROAD "D" PRIVATE ROAD "B" PRIVATE ROAD "A" PRIVATE ROAD "A" PRIVATE ROAD "D" PRIVATE ROAD "C" LOADING AREA PRIVATE
AMENITY AREA PRIVATE AMENITY AREA PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE D 276 Item a. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 1 23 24
44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 22 VIRGINIA VILLAGE KEANE ENTERPRISES 44031 PIPELINE PLAZA, SUITE 100 ASHBURN, VA 20147 2018138 OPEN SPACE SHADE CALCS N/A KG, JG AN, SH JG, SH, AN L1-0710/26/2021
1:41 PM JOE GIANGRANDI G:\2018\2018138\CAD\EXHIBITS\ZONING PLANS\ZMA\8138 - PLN - AREA - CALCS_ALT B.DWG 0 1"=60' 30' 60' 120' SEAL SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE LANDDESIGN
PROJ.# SCALE PROJECT NORTH NO. DESCRIPTION DATE REVISION / ISSUANCE ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE: 24" X 36" NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION VERT: HORZ: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: 200 S. PEYTON
STREET ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314 703.549.7784 WWW.LANDDESIGN.COM 1 07.03.2019 ZMA 2 02.27.2020 ZMA 2ND SUB 3 09.25.2020 ZMA 3RD SUB 4 03.12.2021 ZMA 4TH SUB 5 06.29.2021 ZMA 5TH SUB 6 10.27.2021
ZMA 6TH SUB SYMBOL NOTES 1 - USEABLE OPEN SPACE TOWNHOUSE MEWS 1 2 - USEABLE OPEN SPACE TOWNHOUSE MEWS 2 3 - USEABLE OPEN SPACE TOWN BRANCH OPEN SPACE A - AMENITY SPACE ENTRY PARK B
- AMENITY SPACE COMMON GREEN C - AMENITY SPACE HIGH STREET PARK D - AMENITY SPACE OURS OVERLOOK SHADE - TOWNHOME NORTH SHADE - TOWNHOME SOUTH SHADE - TOWN BRANCH SHADE - ENTRY PARK
SHADE - COMMON GREEN SHADE - HIGH STREET PARK SHADE - OURS OVERLOOK SITE DEVELOPMENT 1 2 3 3 A B C D 1 2 3 A B C D S1 S2 S3 SA SB SC SD FAIRFAX STREET SE FAIRFAX STREET SE TOWN BRANCH
STREAM HARRISON STREET HIGH STREET MADISON CT MADISON CT SOUTH KING STREET RITE AID CATOCTIN CIRCLE CATOCTIN CIRCLE RAFLO PARK MADISON HOUSE AUTO DEALER CRESCENT PLACE BARBER BLDG 'B'
BLDG 'F' BLDG 'E' BLDG 'D' BLDG 'A' BLDG 'C' MADISON CT PRIVATE ROAD "D" PRIVATE ROAD "B" PRIVATE ROAD "A" PRIVATE ROAD "A" PRIVATE ROAD "D" PRIVATE ROAD "C" LOADING AREA PRIVATE AMENITY
AREA PRIVATE AMENITY AREA PROPOSED SHADE ELEMENT TYP. EXISTING SHADE ELEMENT TYP. PROPOSED PROGRAM ELEMENT AMPHITHEATER. PROPOSED PROGRAM ELEMENT SPLASH PLAY PROPOSED PROGRAM ELEMENT
- OPEN LAWN PROPOSED PROGRAM ELEMENT - OPEN LAWN PROPOSED PROGRAM ELEMENT - GAME TABLE AREA PROPOSED PROGRAM ELEMENT - LOUNGE AREA S3 SD SC SB SA S1 S2 PROPOSED PROGRAM ELEMENT - LARGE
SIGNATURE TREE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE 277 Item a. VIRGINIA VILLAGE KEANE ENTERPRISES 44031 PIPELINE PLAZA, SUITE 100 ASHBURN, VA 20147 2018138 PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION N/A KG, JG AN, SH JG
L2-0110/26/2021 1:41 PM JOE GIANGRANDI G:\2018\2018138\CAD\EXHIBITS\ZONING PLANS\ZMA\8138 - SECT - STRT2.DWG (NOT TO SCALE) NTS SEAL SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE LANDDESIGN PROJ.#
SCALE PROJECT NORTH NO. DESCRIPTION DATE REVISION / ISSUANCE ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE: 24" X 36" NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION VERT: HORZ: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: 200 S. PEYTON STREET
ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314 703.549.7784 WWW.LANDDESIGN.COM 1 07.03.2019 ZMA 2 02.27.2020 ZMA 2ND SUB 3 09.25.2020 ZMA 3RD SUB 4 03.12.2021 ZMA 4TH SUB 5 06.29.2021 ZMA 5TH SUB 6 10.27.2021
ZMA 6TH SUB FAIRFAX STREET SE HIGH STREET MADISON CT MADISON CT RITE AID RAFLO PARK MADISON HOUSE AUTO DEALER BARBER BLDG 'B' BLDG 'F' BLDG 'E' BLDG 'D' BLDG 'A' BLDG 'C' MADISON CT
PRIVATE ROAD "D" PRIVATE ROAD "B" PRIVATE ROAD "A" PRIVATE ROAD "A" PRIVATE ROAD "C" 278 Item a. 6'-0" MIN. PEDESTRIAN ZONE 7'-0" MIN. 8'-0" MIN. 7'-0" TYP. TREE PANEL TRAVEL LANE TRAVEL
LANE ON STREET PARKING TREE PANEL PEDESTRIAN ZONE FRONTAGE ZONE PEDESTRIAN REFUGE PEDESTRIAN REFUGE FAIRFAX STREET BUILD-TO-LINE BUILD-TO-LINE 8'-0" MIN. ON STREET PARKING 5'-0" TYP.
FRONTAGE ZONE 13'-0" 13'-0" 9'-0" TYP. CONDITION WITH STREET PARKING SOUTH SIDE OF STREET NORTH SIDE OF STREET 6'-0" TYP. ONE WAY TRAVEL LANEON STREET PARKING PEDESTRIAN ZONE FRONTAGE
ZONE 8'-0" MIN 6'-6" TYP. 6'-0" TYP. TREE PANEL 4'-0" TYP. ON STREET PARKING 14'-0" MIN ONE WAY TRAVEL LANE SEE PARK ENLARGEMENTS COMMON GREEN 14'-0" MIN8'-0" MIN TREE PANEL 6'-6" TYP.
PEDESTRIAN ZONE 6'-0" TYP. FRONTAGE ZONE 4'-0" TYP. PEDESTRIAN REFUGE PEDESTRIAN REFUGE RESIDENTIALBUILD-TO-LINE RESIDENTIALBUILD-TO-LINE MADISON COURT MADISON COURT WEST SIDE OF STREET
EAST SIDE OF STREET FRONTAGE ZONE TREE PANEL PEDESTRIAN ZONE 6'-0" TYP. 6'-6" TYP. 12'-0" MIN 12'-0" MIN 6'-6" TYP. TRAVEL LANE TRAVEL LANE TREE PANEL PEDESTRIAN ZONE RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
MADISON COURT BUILD-TO-LINE BUILD-TO-LINE 5'-6" TYP. FRONTAGE ZONE 5'-6" TYP.6'-0" TYP.8'-0" MIN PARKING SPOT 8'-0" MIN PARKING SPOT WEST SIDE OF STREET EAST SIDE OF STREET 6'-0" MIN.
PEDESTRIAN ZONE 7'-0" MIN. 9'-6" TYP. TREE PANEL TRAVEL LANE TRAVEL LANE TREE PANEL PEDESTRIAN ZONE FRONTAGE ZONE PEDESTRIAN REFUGE FAIRFAX STREET BUILD-TO-LINE BUILD-TO-LINE 8'-0"
MIN. ON STREET PARKING 5'-0" TYP. FRONTAGE ZONE 13'-0" 13'-0" 9'-0" TYP. CONDITION WHEN NO ON STREET PARKING SOUTH SIDE OF STREET NORTH SIDE OF STREET 6'-0" TYP. VIRGINIA VILLAGE KEANE
ENTERPRISES 44031 PIPELINE PLAZA, SUITE 100 ASHBURN, VA 20147 2018138 STREETSCAPE SECTIONS N/A KG, JG AN, SH JG, SH, AN L2-0210/26/2021 1:41 PM JOE GIANGRANDI G:\2018\2018138\CAD\EXHIBITS\ZONI
NG PLANS\ZMA\8138 - SECT - STRT2.DWG AS NOTED SEAL SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE LANDDESIGN PROJ.# SCALE PROJECT NORTH NO. DESCRIPTION DATE REVISION / ISSUANCE ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE: 24" X
36" NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION VERT: HORZ: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: 200 S. PEYTON STREET ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314 703.549.7784 WWW.LANDDESIGN.COM 1 07.03.2019 ZMA 2 02.27.2020 ZMA 2ND
SUB 3 09.25.2020 ZMA 3RD SUB 4 03.12.2021 ZMA 4TH SUB 5 06.29.2021 ZMA 5TH SUB 6 10.27.2021 ZMA 6TH SUB SECTION 1" = 10' SECTION 1" = 10'SECTION 1" = 10' CATOCTIN CIRCLE HARRISON STREET
SOUTH KING STREET B A E C D F CATOCTIN CIRCLE HARRISON STREET SOUTH KING STREET B A E C D F CATOCTIN CIRCLE HARRISON STREET SOUTH KING STREET B A E C D F MADISON COURT L2-02 1 FAIRFAX
STREET4 L2-02 MADISON COURT AT COMMON GREEN L2-02 2 *Perspective shown for illustrative purposes only. *Perspective shown for illustrative purposes only. *Perspective shown for illustrative
purposes only. NOTE: FOR DESIGN INTENT OF FURNISHINGS AND FINISHES, SUCH AS PAVING, WALL FINISHES, CROSSWALKS, SITE BENCHES, SITE BIKE RACK, SITE WASTE RECEPTACLES, SITE TRAFFIC DETERRENT,
SEE SHEET L6-01. VIEW OF SOUTH SIDE OF STREETSCAPE 279 Item a. VARIES 6'-6" OR GREATER FRONTAGE ZONE 7'-0" TYP. 8'-0" MIN. 12'-0" MIN. 12'-0" MIN. 8'-0" MIN. 7'-0" TYP. 6'-0" TYP.
SEE PARK ENLARGEMENTS TREE PANEL PARKING SPOT TRAVEL LANE TRAVEL LANE PARKING SPOT TREE PANEL PEDESTRIAN ZONE HIGH STREE PARK PEDESTRIAN REFUGE PEDESTRIAN REFUGE HIGH STREET BUILD-TO-LINE
BUILD-TO-LINE PEDESTRIAN ZONE 6'-0" TYP. WEST SIDE OF STREET EAST SIDE OF STREET OURS OVERLOOKPEDESTRIAN ZONE TREE ZONEFRONTAGE ZONE PEDESTRIAN ZONE TRAVEL LANETRAVEL LANE TRAFFIC DETERRENT
TRAFFIC DETERRENT PEDESTRIAN REFUGE PEDESTRIAN REFUGE FAIRFAX STREET BUILD-TO-LINE 7'-0" TYP.5'-0" 9'-0" TYP. 6'-6" TYP. 8'-0" 13'-0" 13'-0" 8'-0" 9'-0" TYP. SEE PARK ENLARGEMENT PARKING
SPOTTREE PANEL PARKING SPOT CONDITION WITH STREET PARKING SOUTH SIDE OF STREET NORTH SIDE OF STREET OURS OVERLOOKPEDESTRIAN ZONE TREE ZONEFRONTAGE ZONE PEDESTRIAN ZONE TRAVEL LANETRAVEL
LANE TRAFFIC DETERRENT PEDESTRIAN REFUGE FAIRFAX STREET BUILD-TO-LINE 6'-0" TYP. 9'-0" TYP. 9'-6" TYP. 13'-0" 13'-0" 7'-0" TYP. 9'-0" TYP. SEE PARK ENLARGEMENT TREE PANEL CONDITION
WHEN NO ON STREET PARKINGCONDITION WHEN NO ON STREET PARKING SOUTH SIDE OF STREET NORTH SIDE OF STREET AS NOTED SEAL SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE LANDDESIGN PROJ.# SCALE PROJECT NORTH NO.
DESCRIPTION DATE REVISION / ISSUANCE ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE: 24" X 36" NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION VERT: HORZ: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: 200 S. PEYTON STREET ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314 703.549.7784
WWW.LANDDESIGN.COM 1 07.03.2019 ZMA 2 02.27.2020 ZMA 2ND SUB 3 09.25.2020 ZMA 3RD SUB 4 03.12.2021 ZMA 4TH SUB 5 06.29.2021 ZMA 5TH SUB 6 10.27.2021 ZMA 6TH SUB SECTION 1" = 10'-0"
SECTION 1" = 10'-0" CATOCTIN CIRCLE HARRISON STREET SOUTH KING STREET B A E C D F CATOCTIN CIRCLE HARRISON STREET SOUTH KING STREET B A E C D F CATOCTIN CIRCLE HARRISON STREET SOUTH
KING STREET B A E C D F FARIFAX STREET L2-03 1 HIGH STREET AT HIGH STREET PARK L2-03 2 VIEW A VIEW B A B VIRGINIA VILLAGE KEANE ENTERPRISES 44031 PIPELINE PLAZA, SUITE 100 ASHBURN,
VA 20147 2018138 STREETSCAPE SECTIONS N/A KG, JG AN, SH JG, SH, AN L2-0310/26/2021 1:42 PM JOE GIANGRANDI G:\2018\2018138\CAD\EXHIBITS\ZONING PLANS\ZMA\8138 - SECT - STRT2.DWG
NOTE: FOR DESIGN INTENT OF FURNISHINGS AND FINISHES, SUCH AS PAVING, WALL FINISHES, CROSSWALKS, SITE BENCHES, SITE BIKE RACK, SITE WASTE RECEPTACLES, SITE TRAFFIC DETERRENT, SEE SHEET
L6-01. VIEW OF WEST SIDE STREETSCAPE 280 Item a. TRAVEL LANETRAVEL LANEMEDIAN / TURNING LANE P L PLANT BED 6'-0" TYP. 9'-0" TYP. PEDESTRIAN ZONE VARIES FRONTAGE ZONE CATOCTIN CIRCLE
HALF SECTION BUILD-TO LINE NO TREES PROVIDED IN THIS LOCATION DUE TO CONFLICTS WITH SIGHT DISTANCE LINES APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF SIGHT DISTANCE LINE TREES LOCATED BEHIND SIGHT DISTANCE
LINE +/-11'-0" +/-13'-0"+/-13'-0" E.Q. E.Q. P L RETAILRESIDENTIALRESIDENTIAL 6'-0" TYP. 9'-0" TYP. VARIES PEDESTRIAN ZONE FRONTAGE ZONEPLANT BEDTRAVEL LANETRAVEL LANEMEDIAN / TURNING
LANE CATOCTIN CIRCLE HALF SECTION +/-11'-0" +/-13'-0"+/-13'-0" E.Q. E.Q. NO TREES PROVIDED IN THIS LOCATION DUE TO CONFLICTS WITH SIGHT DISTANCE LINES SIDEWALK TREE PANEL TRAVEL LANE
TRAVEL LANE PARKING SPOT TREE PANEL FRONTAGE ZONE FRONTAGE ZONE PARKING SPOT PEDESTRIAN ZONE 6'-0" TYP. 13'-0" MIN 13'-0" MIN 8'-0" MIN 7'-0" TYP. 6'-0" TYP. PEDESTRIAN REFUGE FAIRFAX
STREET VARIES SEE SOJ 8'-0" MIN BUILD-TO-LINE BUILD-TO-LINE VARIES SEE SOJ 7'-0" TYP. BUILDING E BUILDING D WEST SIDE OF STREET EAST SIDE OF STREET AS NOTED SEAL SHEET NUMBER SHEET
TITLE LANDDESIGN PROJ.# SCALE PROJECT NORTH NO. DESCRIPTION DATE REVISION / ISSUANCE ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE: 24" X 36" NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION VERT: HORZ: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY:
200 S. PEYTON STREET ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314 703.549.7784 WWW.LANDDESIGN.COM 1 07.03.2019 ZMA 2 02.27.2020 ZMA 2ND SUB 3 09.25.2020 ZMA 3RD SUB 4 03.12.2021 ZMA 4TH SUB 5 06.29.2021 ZMA
5TH SUB 6 10.27.2021 ZMA 6TH SUB SECTION 1" = 10' SECTION 1" = 10' SECTION 1" = 10' CATOCTIN CIRCLE HARRISON STREET SOUTH KING STREET B A E C D F CATOCTIN CIRCLE HARRISON STREET SOUTH
KING STREET B A E C D F CATOCTIN CIRCLE HARRISON STREET SOUTH KING STREET B A E C D F CATOCTIN CIRCLE HARRISON STREET SOUTH KING STREET B A E C D F CATOCTIN CIRCLE1 L2-04 CATOCTIN CIRCLE
AT RETAIL L2-04 2 FAIRFAX STREET AT TOWNHOMES 3 L2-04 VIRGINIA VILLAGE KEANE ENTERPRISES 44031 PIPELINE PLAZA, SUITE 100 ASHBURN, VA 20147 2018138 STREETSCAPE SECTIONS N/A KG, JG AN,
SH JG, SH, AN L2-0410/26/2021 1:42 PM JOE GIANGRANDI G:\2018\2018138\CAD\EXHIBITS\ZONING PLANS\ZMA\8138 - SECT - STRT2.DWG VIEW A VIEW B A NO TREES PROVIDED IN THIS LOCATION DUE
TO CONFLICTS WITH SIGHT DISTANCE LINES NO TREES PROVIDED IN THIS LOCATION DUE TO CONFLICTS WITH SIGHT DISTANCE LINES B NOTE: FOR DESIGN INTENT OF FURNISHINGS AND FINISHES, SUCH AS PAVING,
WALL FINISHES, CROSSWALKS, SITE BENCHES, SITE BIKE RACK, SITE WASTE RECEPTACLES, SITE TRAFFIC DETERRENT, SEE SHEET L6-01. VIEW OF WEST SIDE STREETSCAPE VIEW OF EAST SIDE STREETSCAPE
281 Item a. ONLY ONLY ONLY ONLY ONLY ONLY 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 1 23 24 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51
52 53 22 VIRGINIA VILLAGE KEANE ENTERPRISES 44031 PIPELINE PLAZA, SUITE 100 ASHBURN, VA 20147 2018138 LIGHTING PLAN N/A KG, JG AN, SH JG, SH, AN L3-0010/26/2021 1:42 PM JOE GIANGRANDI
G:\2018\2018138\CAD\EXHIBITS\ZONING PLANS\ZMA\8138 - PLN - LGHT_ALT B.DWG 0 1"=60' 30' 60' 120' SEAL SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE LANDDESIGN PROJ.# SCALE PROJECT NORTH NO.
DESCRIPTION DATE REVISION / ISSUANCE ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE: 24" X 36" NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION VERT: HORZ: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: 200 S. PEYTON STREET ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314 703.549.7784
WWW.LANDDESIGN.COM 1 07.03.2019 ZMA 2 02.27.2020 ZMA 2ND SUB 3 09.25.2020 ZMA 3RD SUB 4 03.12.2021 ZMA 4TH SUB 5 06.29.2021 ZMA 5TH SUB 6 10.27.2021 ZMA 6TH SUB CATOCTIN CIRCLE SE S
KING STREET HARRISON STREET SE BLDG 'A' BLDG 'E' BLDG 'D' BLDG 'C' BLDG 'B' TOWN BRANCH BLDG 'F' LOADING AREA LIGHTING LEGEND LIGHT POLE AND DISTRIBUTION - TYPE 1 LIGHT POLE AND DISTRIBUTION
- TYPE 2 WALL MOUNTED FIXTURE AND DISTRIBUTION - TYPE 1 LIGHTING NOTES: 1. ALL SITE LIGHTING WILL COMPLY WITH ZONING ORDINANCE SECTION 12.11. LIGHTING WILL BE SHOWN ON THE FINAL SITE
PLAN WITH FINAL ENGINEERING AND SHALL BE LOCATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DCSM ARTICLE 7-600. EXCLUDING ENTRY/SECURITY LIGHTING FIXTURES MOUNTED TO THE OUTSIDE OF THE PARKING STRUCTURES,
LIGHTING FIXTURES LOCATED WITHIN THE PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL BE MOUNTED TO CEILINGS AND ARE NOT TO BE VISIBLE TO THE OUTSIDE. 2. ALL LIGHT POLES SHALL BE NO HIGHER THAN 15' IN ACCORDANCE
WITH SEC. 7.10.5.E. ALL STREET LIGHT POLES SHALL COMPLY WITH SEC. 7.10.11.E. 3. ALL LIGHTING FIXTURES SHALL BE CLASSIFIED AS "FULL CUTOFF" IN ACCORDANCE WITH 12.11.3.A. 4. PLAN DEPICTS
LIGHTING FOR PRIVATE STREETS ONLY. 15'-0" MAX PHILIPS HADCO; HAGERSTOWN POST TOP LED; FULL CUTOFF; BLACK FINISH LIGHT FIXTURE & POST 10/26/2021 1:42 PM JOE GIANGRANDI G:\2018\2018138\CAD\EXHIB
ITS\ZONING PLANS\ZMA\8138 - PLN - LGHT_ALT B.DWG PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE 282 Item a. ONLY ONLY VIRGINIA VILLAGE KEANE ENTERPRISES 44031 PIPELINE PLAZA, SUITE 100 ASHBURN, VA 20147 2018138
LANDSCAPE PLAN N/A KG, JG AN, SH JG, SH, AN L4-0110/26/2021 1:42 PM JOE GIANGRANDI G:\2018\2018138\CAD\EXHIBITS\ZONING PLANS\ZMA\8138 - PLN - PLNT.DWG 0 1"= 15' 30'
60' 30' KEY MAP SEAL SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE LANDDESIGN PROJ.# SCALE PROJECT NORTH NO. DESCRIPTION DATE REVISION / ISSUANCE ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE: 24" X 36" NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION VERT:
HORZ: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: 200 S. PEYTON STREET ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314 703.549.7784 WWW.LANDDESIGN.COM 1 07.03.2019 ZMA CATOCTIN CIRCLE HARRISON STREET SOUTH KING STREET
2 02.27.2020 ZMA 2ND SUB 3 09.25.2020 ZMA 3RD SUB 4 03.12.2021 ZMA 4TH SUB LARGE CANOPY TREE 2" CALIPER MINIMUM; CANOPY CREDIT = 260 SF MEDIUM CANOPY TREE 2" CALIPER MINIMUM; CANOPY
CREDIT = 185 SF UNDERSTORY TREE 6` HEIGHT MINIMUM; CANOPY CREDIT = 110 SF SMALL EVERGREEN TREE 6` HEIGHT MINIMUM; CANOPY CREDIT = 25 SF SHRUB 18" HEIGHT MINIMUM PLANT LIST BLDG 'A'
HIGH STREET CATOCTIN CIRCLE SE FAIRFAX ST MATCHLINE: SEE SHEET L4-02 MATCHLINE: SEE SHEET L4-03 MATCHLINE: SEE SHEET L4-03 HIGH STREET PARK BLDG 'F' PRIVATE AMENITY AREA BUILD-TO-LINE,
TYP. BUILD-TO-LINE, TYP. SIGHT DISTANCE LINE, TYP. SIGHT DISTANCE EASEMENT, TYP. CONNECTION TO EXISTING SIDEWALK BIKE RACK, TYP.; PARKS 6 BICYCLES TOTAL SIGNATURE TREE SHADE STRUCTURE
INTERSECTION SHALL BE A RAISED INTERSECTION AND SIGNALIZED AS WARRANTED AND COORDINATED WITH VDOT AND THE TOWN OF LEESBURG MATCHLINE: SEE SHEET L4-02 AREA TO BE PLANTED WITH TREES AND
SHRUBBERY AREA TO BE PLANTED WITH TREES AND SHRUBBERY AREA TO BE PLANTED SHRUBBERY, GROUNDCOVERS, AND LAWN DASHED AREA TO BE COMPLETED IN CONJUNCTION WITH ADJACENT TENANT SPACE TO ENSURE
PRODUCTS AND FINISHES ARE COORDINATED. DASHED AREA TO BE COMPLETED IN CONJUNCTION WITH ADJACENT TENANT SPACE TO ENSURE PRODUCTS AND FINISHES ARE COORDINATED. STREET LIGHT, TYP. 283
Item a. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 1 23 24 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 22 VIRGINIA VILLAGE KEANE
ENTERPRISES 44031 PIPELINE PLAZA, SUITE 100 ASHBURN, VA 20147 2018138 LANDSCAPE PLAN N/A KG, JG AN, SH JG, SH, AN L4-0210/26/2021 1:42 PM JOE GIANGRANDI G:\2018\2018138\CAD\EXHIBITS\ZONING
PLANS\ZMA\8138 - PLN - PLNT.DWG 0 1"= 15' 30' 60' 30' KEY MAP SEAL SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE LANDDESIGN PROJ.# SCALE PROJECT NORTH NO. DESCRIPTION DATE REVISION / ISSUANCE
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE: 24" X 36" NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION VERT: HORZ: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: 200 S. PEYTON STREET ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314 703.549.7784 WWW.LANDDESIGN.COM 1 07.03.2019
ZMA CATOCTIN CIRCLE HARRISON STREET SOUTH KING STREET 2 02.27.2020 ZMA 2ND SUB 3 09.25.2020 ZMA 3RD SUB 4 03.12.2021 ZMA 4TH SUB LARGE CANOPY TREE 2" CALIPER MINIMUM; CANOPY CREDIT
= 260 SF MEDIUM CANOPY TREE 2" CALIPER MINIMUM; CANOPY CREDIT = 185 SF UNDERSTORY TREE 6` HEIGHT MINIMUM; CANOPY CREDIT = 110 SF SMALL EVERGREEN TREE 6` HEIGHT MINIMUM; CANOPY CREDIT
= 25 SF SHRUB 18" HEIGHT MINIMUM PLANT LIST FAIRFAX ST PRIVATE RD 'A' PRIVATE RD 'A' MADISON CT MATCHLINE: SEE SHEET L4-01 MATCHLINE: SEE SHEET L4-03 MATCHLINE: SEE SHEET L4-01 BLDG
'B' COMMON GREEN MADISON CT ONE WAY MADISON CT ONE WAY PRIVATE RD 'A' PRIVATE RD 'D' POTENTIAL ACCESS DRIVE BIKE RACK, TYP.; PARKS 6 BICYCLES TOTAL SCREEN WALL - TYPE F PRIVATE RD 'B'
PRIVATE RD 'C' RAMP CONNECTION TO OFF-SITE SCREEN WALL - TYPE F SCREEN WALL - TYPE F SCREEN WALL - TYPE E SCREEN WALL - TYPE B SCREEN WALL - TYPE F SCREEN WALL - TYPE B SCREEN WALL
- TYPE B SCREEN WALL - TYPE B SCREEN WALL - TYPE B SCREEN WALL - TYPE B SCREEN WALL - TYPE F 4 TREES PROVIDED OFF-SITE ARE NOT INCLUDED AS PART OF THE APPLICANT'S BUFFER OR TREE CALCULATIONS
STREET LIGHT, TYP. MAILBOX, TYP. SCREEN WALL - TYPE E 284 Item a. ONLY ONLY ONLY ONLY VIRGINIA VILLAGE KEANE ENTERPRISES 44031 PIPELINE PLAZA, SUITE 100 ASHBURN, VA 20147 2018138 LANDSCAPE
PLAN N/A KG, JG AN, SH JG, SH, AN L4-0310/26/2021 1:42 PM JOE GIANGRANDI G:\2018\2018138\CAD\EXHIBITS\ZONING PLANS\ZMA\8138 - PLN - PLNT.DWG 0 1"= 15' 30' 60' 30' KEY
MAP SEAL SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE LANDDESIGN PROJ.# SCALE PROJECT NORTH NO. DESCRIPTION DATE REVISION / ISSUANCE ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE: 24" X 36" NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION VERT: HORZ: CHECKED
BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: 200 S. PEYTON STREET ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314 703.549.7784 WWW.LANDDESIGN.COM 1 07.03.2019 ZMA CATOCTIN CIRCLE HARRISON STREET SOUTH KING STREET 2 02.27.2020
ZMA 2ND SUB 3 09.25.2020 ZMA 3RD SUB 4 03.12.2021 ZMA 4TH SUB LARGE CANOPY TREE 2" CALIPER MINIMUM; CANOPY CREDIT = 260 SF MEDIUM CANOPY TREE 2" CALIPER MINIMUM; CANOPY CREDIT = 185
SF UNDERSTORY TREE 6` HEIGHT MINIMUM; CANOPY CREDIT = 110 SF SMALL EVERGREEN TREE 6` HEIGHT MINIMUM; CANOPY CREDIT = 25 SF SHRUB 18" HEIGHT MINIMUM PLANT LIST FAIRFAX ST PRIVATE RD
'H' FAIRFAX ST CATOCTIN CIRCLE SE HARRISON STREET SE BLDG 'E' BLDG 'D' BLDG 'C' BLDG 'B' MATCHLINE: SEE SHEET L4-04 MATCHLINE: SEE SHEET L4-04 MATCHLINE: SEE SHEET L4-04 MATCHLINE:
SEE SHEET L4-01MATCHLINE: SEE SHEET L4-02 TOWN BRANCH OURS OVERLOOK BLDG 'E' PRIVATE AMENITY AREA PRIVATE AMENITY AREA LOADING AREA BUILD-TO-LINE, TYP. SIGHT DISTANCE LINE, TYP. SIGHT
DISTANCE EASEMENT, TYP. BIKE RACK, TYP.; PARKS 6 BICYCLES TOTAL CONNECT TO EXISTING SIDEWALK PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE STREET LIGHT, TYP. 285 Item a. ONLY VIRGINIA VILLAGE KEANE ENTERPRISES
44031 PIPELINE PLAZA, SUITE 100 ASHBURN, VA 20147 2018138 LANDSCAPE PLAN N/A KG, JG AN, SH JG, SH, AN L4-0410/26/2021 1:43 PM JOE GIANGRANDI G:\2018\2018138\CAD\EXHIBITS\ZONING
PLANS\ZMA\8138 - PLN - PLNT.DWG 0 1"= 15' 30' 60' 30' KEY MAP SEAL SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE LANDDESIGN PROJ.# SCALE PROJECT NORTH NO. DESCRIPTION DATE REVISION / ISSUANCE
ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE: 24" X 36" NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION VERT: HORZ: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: 200 S. PEYTON STREET ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314 703.549.7784 WWW.LANDDESIGN.COM 1 07.03.2019
ZMA CATOCTIN CIRCLE HARRISON STREET SOUTH KING STREET 2 02.27.2020 ZMA 2ND SUB 3 09.25.2020 ZMA 3RD SUB 4 03.12.2021 ZMA 4TH SUB LARGE CANOPY TREE 2" CALIPER MINIMUM; CANOPY CREDIT
= 260 SF MEDIUM CANOPY TREE 2" CALIPER MINIMUM; CANOPY CREDIT = 185 SF UNDERSTORY TREE 6` HEIGHT MINIMUM; CANOPY CREDIT = 110 SF SMALL EVERGREEN TREE 6` HEIGHT MINIMUM; CANOPY CREDIT
= 25 SF SHRUB 18" HEIGHT MINIMUM PLANT LIST PRIVATE RD 'H' FAIRFAX ST CATOCTIN CIRCLE SE HARRISON STREET SE BLDG 'E' BLDG 'D' BLDG 'C' MATCHLINE: SEE SHEET L4-03 MATCHLINE: SEE SHEET
L4-03 TOWN BRANCH OURS OVERLOOK PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE CONNECTION LOADING AREA CONNECT WITH EXISTING PATH SIGHT DISTANCE LINE, TYP. FINAL TREE LOCATIONS ON HARRISON STREET TO BE FIELD VERIFIED
BASED ON EXISTING CONDITIONS, TYP. 286 Item a. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 1 23 24 44 45 46 47 48 49
50 51 52 53 22 VIRGINIA VILLAGE KEANE ENTERPRISES 44031 PIPELINE PLAZA, SUITE 100 ASHBURN, VA 20147 2018138 LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE & TREE CALCULATIONS N/A KG, JG AN, SH JG, SH, AN L4-1110/26/2021
1:43 PM JOE GIANGRANDI G:\2018\2018138\CAD\EXHIBITS\ZONING PLANS\ZMA\8138 - PLN - PLNT.DWG 0 1"=60' 30' 60' 120' KEY MAP SEAL SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE LANDDESIGN PROJ.#
SCALE PROJECT NORTH NO. DESCRIPTION DATE REVISION / ISSUANCE ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE: 24" X 36" NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION VERT: HORZ: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: 200 S. PEYTON STREET
ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314 703.549.7784 WWW.LANDDESIGN.COM 1 07.03.2019 ZMA CATOCTIN CIRCLE HARRISON STREET SOUTH KING STREET 2 02.27.2020 ZMA 2ND SUB 3 09.25.2020 ZMA 3RD SUB 4 03.12.2021
ZMA 4TH SUB PRIVATE RD 'H' 1 TREE PER 40 LF OF FRONTAGE FRONTAGE LENGTH = 1175' VEHICULAR OPENINGS = 309' TREE REQ. = 22 1 TREE PER 40 LF OF FRONTAGE FRONTAGE LENGTH = 619' VEHICULAR
OPENINGS = 0 TREE REQ. = 15 LARGE CANOPY TREE 226 2" CALIPER MINIMUM; CANOPY CREDIT = 260 SF MEDIUM CANOPY TREE 73 2" CALIPER MINIMUM; CANOPY CREDIT = 185 SF UNDERSTORY TREE 64 6` HEIGHT
MINIMUM; CANOPY CREDIT = 110 SF SMALL EVERGREEN TREE 55 6` HEIGHT MINIMUM; CANOPY CREDIT = 25 SF SHRUB 18" HEIGHT MINIMUM PLANTING LIST FAIRFAX STREET SE FAIRFAX STREET SE TOWN BRANCH
STREAM HARRISON STREET HIGH STREET MADISON CT MADISON CT SOUTH KING STREET RITE AID CATOCTIN CIRCLE CATOCTIN CIRCLE RAFLO PARK MADISON HOUSE AUTO DEALER CRESCENT PLACE BARBER BLDG 'B'
BLDG 'F' BLDG 'E' BLDG 'D' BLDG 'A' BLDG 'C' MADISON CT PRIVATE ROAD "D" PRIVATE ROAD "B" PRIVATE ROAD "A" PRIVATE ROAD "A" PRIVATE ROAD "A" PRIVATE ROAD "C" PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE 4 TREES
PROVIDED OFF-SITE ARE NOT INCLUDED AS PART OF THE APPLICANT'S BUFFER OR TREE CALCULATIONS 287 Item a. ONLY ONLY ONLY ONLY ONLY ONLY 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 1 23 24 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 22 VIRGINIA VILLAGE KEANE ENTERPRISES 44031 PIPELINE PLAZA, SUITE 100 ASHBURN, VA 20147
2018138 BUFFER YARD CALCULATIONS N/A KG, JG AN, SH JG, SH, AN L4-1210/26/2021 1:43 PM JOE GIANGRANDI G:\2018\2018138\CAD\EXHIBITS\ZONING PLANS\ZMA\8138 - PLN - PLNT.DWG 0
1"=60' 30' 60' 120' KEY MAP SEAL SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE LANDDESIGN PROJ.# SCALE PROJECT NORTH NO. DESCRIPTION DATE REVISION / ISSUANCE ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE: 24" X 36" NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION VERT: HORZ: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: 200 S. PEYTON STREET ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314 703.549.7784 WWW.LANDDESIGN.COM 1 07.03.2019 ZMA CATOCTIN CIRCLE HARRISON STREET
SOUTH KING STREET 2 02.27.2020 ZMA 2ND SUB 3 09.25.2020 ZMA 3RD SUB 4 03.12.2021 ZMA 4TH SUB LOADING AREA 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 SYMBOL NOTES BUFFERYARD #0 NONE REQUIRED BUFFERYARD #1 TYPE
S1 - 958 SF BUFFERYARD #2 TYPE S1 - 625 SF BUFFERYARD #3 TYPE S1 - 2,940 SF BUFFERYARD #4 TYPE S1 - 3,082 SF BUFFERYARD #5 TYPE S3 - 5,895 SF BUFFERYARD #6 TYPE S3 - 8,160 SF BUFFERYARD
#7 TYPE S2 - 4,700 SF BUFFERYARD #8 NONE REQUIRED BUFFER YARDS 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 PRIVATE AMENITY AREA PRIVATE AMENITY AREA PRIVATE AMENITY AREA EMERGENCY FIRE TRUCK ACCESS SCREEN WALL
SCREEN WALL SCREEN WALL SCREEN WALL SCREEN WALL FAIRFAX STREET SE FAIRFAX STREET SE TOWN BRANCH STREAM HARRISON STREET HIGH STREET MADISON CT MADISON CT SOUTH KING STREET RITE AID CATOCTIN
CIRCLE CATOCTIN CIRCLE RAFLO PARK MADISON HOUSE AUTO DEALER CRESCENT PLACE BARBER BLDG 'B' BLDG 'F' BLDG 'E' BLDG 'D' BLDG 'A' BLDG 'C' MADISON CT PRIVATE ROAD "D" PRIVATE ROAD "B"
PRIVATE ROAD "A" PRIVATE ROAD "A" PRIVATE ROAD "A" PRIVATE ROAD "C" PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE ALTERNATIVE LOCATION FOR PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE 288 Item a. TOP OF ROOT BALL SHALL BE FLUSH WITH FINISHED
GRADE ROOT BALL MODIFIED AS REQUIRED, SEE PLANTING NOTES SOIL BERM 4" HIGH X 8" WIDE ABOVE ROOT BALL SURFACE , BERM SHALL BEGIN AT ROOT BALL PERIPHERY SOIL MIX, AS SPECIFIED 3" LAYER
OF MULCH, NO MORE THAN 1" OF MULCH ON TOP OF ROOT BALL (SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR MULCH) EXISTING SOIL SLOPE SIDES OF LOOSENED SOIL, NOT TO EXCEED 3:1 SLOPE BOTTOM OF ROOT BALL RESTS ON
EXISTING OR RECOMPACTED SOIL3X ROOT BALL MIN. FINISH GRADE 3X ROOT BALL MIN. 4" HIGH X 8" WIDE ROUND- TOPPED SOIL BERM ABOVE ROOT BALL, BERM SHALL BEGIN AT ROOT BALL PERIPHERY 3" LAYER
OF MULCH NO MORE THAN 1" OF MULCH ON TOP OF ROOT BALL FINISH GRADE SLOPE SIDES OF LOOSENED SOIL ROOT BALL RESTS ON EXISTING OR RECOMPACTED SOIL EXISTING SOIL SOIL MIX, AS SPECIFIED
PLANT SPACING CHART ROWS "A" SPACING "D" SPACING "D" 6" O.C. 8" O.C. 10" O.C. 12" O.C. 15" O.C. 18" O.C. 24" O.C. ROW "A" 5.20" O.C. 6.93" O.C. 8.66" O.C. 10.40" O.C. 13.00" O.C. 15.60"
O.C. 20.80" O.C. PLANTS / S.F. 4.61 2.60 1.66 1.15 0.73 0.51 0.29 LAYER OF MULCH FINISHED GRADE SOIL MIX, AS SPECIFIED EXISTING SOIL GRASS SEED OR SOD TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER PRIOR
TO INSTALLATIONWATER THOROUGHLY UPON INSTALLATION 4"MIN. LAWN SOIL, SEE SOIL SPECS SAND OR BANK RUN GRAVEL (SILT CONTENT 10% MAX) RAKED SUBGRADE TO BE FREE OF STONES OVER 3" AND ALL
DEBRIS 4"MIN. 3" SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCHEQ. EQ. CURB & GUTTER, SEE CIVIL DWGS PLANTING SOIL COMPACTED SOIL UNDER ROOT BALL ROOT BALL 1 2 6" FREE DRAIN GRAVEL 3'-0" TYP. PERFORATED UNDERDRAIN
PIPE WRAPPED IN FILTER FABRIC TREE BEYOND C L CURB AND GUTTER SEE CIVIL DWGS PAVEMENT, TYP. SECTION - AT STRUC. CELLS SCALE 1 2" = 1'-0" VARIES - DEPTH TO BE DETERMINED AT TIME OF SITE
PLAN VARIES - WIDTH TO BE DETERMINED AT TIME OF SITE PLAN NOTES: 1. OR APPROVED EQUAL 2. TREES THAT WILL REQUIRE EXPANDED ROOT ZONE SHALL BE INDENTIFIED AND DOCUMENTED AT TIME OF SITE
PLAN 3. STRUCTURAL CELL TECHNOLOGY SYSTEM TO BE PROVIDED AT TIME OF SITE PLAN. 4. STRUCTURAL CELL FINAL LAYOUT WILL BE PROVIDED AT TIME OF SITE PLAN AND SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH ALL
SITE UTILITIES TO AVOID CONFLICT THAT WOULD PRECLUDE THE USE OF THE STRUCTURAL CELL TECHNOLOGY STRUCTURAL CELL TECHNOLOGY OR AN APPROVED EQUAL SHALL BE PROVIDED BETWEEN THE TREE PITS
TO ENHANCE ROOTING AREA UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE DIRECTOR DUE TO UNAVOIDABLE UTILITY CONFLICTS. ON STREET PARKING/TRAVEL LANE STRUCTURAL CELL TECHNOLOGY OR AN APPROVED EQUAL
SHALL BE PROVIDED BETWEEN THE TREE PITS TO ENHANCE ROOTING AREA UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE DIRECTOR DUE TO UNAVOIDABLE UTILITY CONFLICTS. FRONT OF CURB PLAN VIEW: SCALE 1 8" =
1'-0" VARIES SEE PLANS MIN. 6' VARIES SEE PLANS MIN. 10' STRUCTURAL CELL TECHNOLOGY OR AN APPROVED EQUAL SHALL BE PROVIDED BETWEEN THE TREE PITS TO ENHANCE ROOTING AREA UNLESS OTHERWISE
APPROVED BY THE DIRECTOR DUE TO UNAVOIDABLE UTILITY CONFLICTS. SECTION 3/8" = 1'-0" SECTION 1/2" = 1'-0" PLAN/SECTION 1:16_XREF SECTION 1:4_XREF VIRGINIA VILLAGE KEANE ENTERPRISES 44031
PIPELINE PLAZA, SUITE 100 ASHBURN, VA 20147 2018138 PLANTING DETAILS N/A KG, JG AN, SH JG, SH, AN L4-1310/26/2021 1:43 PM JOE GIANGRANDI G:\2018\2018138\CAD\EXHIBITS\ZONING PLANS\ZMA\8138
- DLT - PLNT.DWG N/A KEY MAP SEAL SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE LANDDESIGN PROJ.# SCALE PROJECT NORTH NO. DESCRIPTION DATE REVISION / ISSUANCE ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE: 24" X 36" NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
VERT: HORZ: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: 200 S. PEYTON STREET ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314 703.549.7784 WWW.LANDDESIGN.COM 1 07.03.2019 ZMA 2 02.27.2020 ZMA 2ND SUB 3 09.25.2020 ZMA 3RD
SUB 4 03.12.2021 ZMA 4TH SUB SECTION 1:16_XREF TREE PLANTING1 L4-13 SHRUB PLANTING L4-13 2 GROUNDCOVER PLANTING3 L4-13 GRASS PLANTING L4-13 4 TREE PIT PLANTING5 L4-13 SECTION 1/2" =
1'-0" TREE PIT @ STRUC. CELLS L4-13 6 289 Item a. +/-185'30' 30'+/-165' +/- 44' +/- 35' TO TOP OF RAIL +/- 35' TO TOP OF RAIL +/- 44' +/- 35' TO TOP OF RAIL +/- 44' +/- 44' +/- 35'
TO TOP OF RAIL +/-215' CATOCTIN CIRCLE HARRISON STREET SOUTH KING STREET B A E C D F VIRGINIA VILLAGE KEANE ENTERPRISES 44031 PIPELINE PLAZA, SUITE 100 ASHBURN, VA 20147 2018138 BOUNDARY
SECTIONS N/A KG, JG AN, SH JG, SH, AN L5-0210/26/2021 1:43 PM JOE GIANGRANDI G:\2018\2018138\CAD\EXHIBITS\ZONING PLANS\ZMA\8138 - SECT - SITE.DWG AS NOTED SEAL SHEET NUMBER SHEET
TITLE LANDDESIGN PROJ.# SCALE PROJECT NORTH NO. DESCRIPTION DATE REVISION / ISSUANCE ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE: 24" X 36" NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION VERT: HORZ: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY:
200 S. PEYTON STREET ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314 703.549.7784 WWW.LANDDESIGN.COM 1 07.03.2019 ZMA 2 02.27.2020 ZMA 2ND SUB 3 09.25.2020 ZMA 3RD SUB 4 03.12.2021 ZMA 4TH SUB 5 06.29.2021 ZMA
5TH SUB 6 10.27.2021 ZMA 6TH SUB SECTION AS NOTED SECTION NOTES: 1. ARCHITECTURE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS FOR ELEVATIONS. 2. FOR DESIGN INTENT OF FURNISHINGS AND
FINISHES OF PAVING, WALLS, CROSSWALKS, SITE BENCHES, SITE BIKE RACKS, SITE WASTE RECEPTACLES AND SITE TRAFFIC DETERRENTS, SEE SHEET L6-01. VIEW NORTH VIEW NORTH BUFFER YARD #3 PROPERTY
LINE PROPERTY LINE TOWHOUSES, TYP. STREET TREES TOWHOUSES, TYP. BUFFER YARD #5 MADISON HOUSE EXISTING VEGETATION TOWNHOUSES, TYP. MADISON HOUSE S. KING STREET SINGLE FAMILY PREDOMINATE
STRUCTURE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE BUFFER YARD #3 BUFFER YARD #5 3 STORIES FACING ADJACENT USE - TYP. 3 STORIES FACING ADJACENT USE - TYP. 3 STORIES FACING ADJACENT USE - TYP. 3
STORIES FACING ADJACENT USE - TYP. +/- 44 +/- 44 +/- 44 +/- 44 PLAN DIAGRAM OF TOWN HOUSE UNITS +/- 35' TO TOP OF RAIL +/- 35' TO TOP OF RAIL +/- 35' TO TOP OF RAIL +/- 35' TO TOP OF
RAIL BOUNDARY SECTION 3 L5-02 1 SCREEN WALL - TYPE F SCREEN WALL - TYPE F SCREEN WALL - TYPE F SCREEN WALL - TYPE F 290 Item a. 55' 30' 116' TO PRINCIPLE STRUCTURE CATOCTIN CIRCLE HARRISON
STREET SOUTH KING STREET B A E C D F VIRGINIA VILLAGE KEANE ENTERPRISES 44031 PIPELINE PLAZA, SUITE 100 ASHBURN, VA 20147 2018138 BOUNDARY SECTIONS N/A KG, JG AN, SH JG, SH, AN L5-0310/26/2021
1:43 PM JOE GIANGRANDI G:\2018\2018138\CAD\EXHIBITS\ZONING PLANS\ZMA\8138 - SECT - SITE.DWG AS NOTED SEAL SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE LANDDESIGN PROJ.# SCALE PROJECT NORTH NO. DESCRIPTION
DATE REVISION / ISSUANCE ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE: 24" X 36" NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION VERT: HORZ: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: 200 S. PEYTON STREET ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314 703.549.7784 WWW.LANDDESIGN.COM
1 07.03.2019 ZMA 2 02.27.2020 ZMA 2ND SUB 3 09.25.2020 ZMA 3RD SUB 4 03.12.2021 ZMA 4TH SUB 5 06.29.2021 ZMA 5TH SUB 6 10.27.2021 ZMA 6TH SUB SECTION AS NOTED VIEW SOUTH VIEW SOUTH
COMMON GREEN STACKED TOWN HOUSE STACKED TOWN HOUSE STREET TREESSTREET TREES SMALL STRUCTURE COMMON GREEN STACKED TOWN HOUSE BUFFER YARD #5 BUFFER YARD #1 BUFFER YARD #1 STACKED TOWN
HOUSEBUFFER YARD #6 STREET TREES STREET TREES SMALL STRUCTURE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE BACK YARD OF MADISON HOUSE (EXISTING VEGETATION BUFFER NOT SHOWN)
BACK YARD OF MADISON HOUSE SECTION NOTES: 1. ARCHITECTURE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS FOR ELEVATIONS. 2. FOR DESIGN INTENT OF FURNISHINGS AND FINISHES OF PAVING, WALLS,
CROSSWALKS, SITE BENCHES, SITE BIKE RACKS, SITE WASTE RECEPTACLES AND SITE TRAFFIC DETERRENTS, SEE SHEET L6-01. BOUNDARY SECTION 4 L5-03 1 BUFFER YARD #6 BUFFER YARD #5 SCREEN WALL
- TYPE F SCREEN WALL - TYPE F SCREEN WALL - TYPE F SCREEN WALL - TYPE F 291 Item a. 30' +/- 35' TO TOP OF RAIL +/- 44' CATOCTIN CIRCLE HARRISON STREET SOUTH KING STREET B A E C D F
VIRGINIA VILLAGE KEANE ENTERPRISES 44031 PIPELINE PLAZA, SUITE 100 ASHBURN, VA 20147 2018138 BOUNDARY SECTIONS N/A KG, JG AN, SH JG, SH, AN L5-0410/26/2021 1:43 PM JOE GIANGRANDI
G:\2018\2018138\CAD\EXHIBITS\ZONING PLANS\ZMA\8138 - SECT - SITE.DWG AS NOTED SEAL SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE LANDDESIGN PROJ.# SCALE PROJECT NORTH NO. DESCRIPTION DATE REVISION /
ISSUANCE ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE: 24" X 36" NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION VERT: HORZ: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: 200 S. PEYTON STREET ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314 703.549.7784 WWW.LANDDESIGN.COM
1 07.03.2019 ZMA 2 02.27.2020 ZMA 2ND SUB 3 09.25.2020 ZMA 3RD SUB 4 03.12.2021 ZMA 4TH SUB 5 06.29.2021 ZMA 5TH SUB 6 10.27.2021 ZMA 6TH SUB SECTION AS NOTED PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY
LINE STACKED TOWN HOUSE VIEW NORTH VIEW NORTH SCREEN WALL - TYPE F CAR LOT CAR LOT STACKED TOWN HOUSE3 STORIES FACING ADJACENT USE - TYP. 3 STORIES FACING ADJACENT USE - TYP. SECTION
NOTES: 1. ARCHITECTURE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS FOR ELEVATIONS. 2. FOR DESIGN INTENT OF FURNISHINGS AND FINISHES OF PAVING, WALLS, CROSSWALKS, SITE BENCHES, SITE
BIKE RACKS, SITE WASTE RECEPTACLES AND SITE TRAFFIC DETERRENTS, SEE SHEET L6-01. +/- 44 STACKED TOWN HOUSE STACKED TOWN HOUSE R.O.W. PLAN DIAGRAM OF TOWN HOUSE UNITS +/- 35' TO TOP
OF RAIL BUFFER YARD #0 BUFFER YARD #0 +/- 44 +/- 35' TO TOP OF RAIL BOUNDARY SECTION 6 L5-04 1 SCREEN WALL - TYPE F 292 Item a. 17.5'55' +/- 35' TO TOP OF RAIL 21' 55' +/- 35' TO TOP
OF RAIL CATOCTIN CIRCLE HARRISON STREET SOUTH KING STREET B A E C D F CATOCTIN CIRCLE HARRISON STREET SOUTH KING STREET B A E C D F VIRGINIA VILLAGE KEANE ENTERPRISES 44031 PIPELINE
PLAZA, SUITE 100 ASHBURN, VA 20147 2018138 BOUNDARY SECTIONS N/A KG, JG AN, SH JG, SH, AN L5-0510/26/2021 1:43 PM JOE GIANGRANDI G:\2018\2018138\CAD\EXHIBITS\ZONING PLANS\ZMA\8138
- SECT - SITE.DWG AS NOTED SEAL SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE LANDDESIGN PROJ.# SCALE PROJECT NORTH NO. DESCRIPTION DATE REVISION / ISSUANCE ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE: 24" X 36" NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
VERT: HORZ: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: 200 S. PEYTON STREET ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314 703.549.7784 WWW.LANDDESIGN.COM 1 07.03.2019 ZMA 2 02.27.2020 ZMA 2ND SUB 3 09.25.2020 ZMA 3RD
SUB 4 03.12.2021 ZMA 4TH SUB 5 06.29.2021 ZMA 5TH SUB 6 10.27.2021 ZMA 6TH SUB SECTION AS NOTED SECTION AS NOTED VIEW WEST VIEW WEST BUFFER YARD #4 PROPERTY LINE MADISON CT. DUPLEX
3 STORIES FACING ADJACENT USE - TYP. STREET TREES PROPERTY LINE BUFFER YARD #4 MADISON CT. DUPLEX STREET TREES 3 STORIES FACING ADJACENT USE - TYP. VIEW WEST VIEW WEST PROPERTY LINE
BUFFER YARD #4 SCREEN WALL - TYPE B MADISON CT. DUPLEX 3 STORIES FACING ADJACENT USE - TYP. PROPERTY LINE MADISON CT. DUPLEX 3 STORIES FACING ADJACENT USE - TYP. BUFFER YARD #4 SCREEN
WALL - TYPE B SECTION NOTES: 1. ARCHITECTURE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS FOR ELEVATIONS. 2. FOR DESIGN INTENT OF FURNISHINGS AND FINISHES OF PAVING, WALLS, CROSSWALKS,
SITE BENCHES, SITE BIKE RACKS, SITE WASTE RECEPTACLES AND SITE TRAFFIC DETERRENTS, SEE SHEET L6-01. SECTION NOTES: 1. ARCHITECTURE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS FOR ELEVATIONS.
2. FOR DESIGN INTENT OF FURNISHINGS AND FINISHES OF PAVING, WALLS, CROSSWALKS, SITE BENCHES, SITE BIKE RACKS, SITE WASTE RECEPTACLES AND SITE TRAFFIC DETERRENTS, SEE SHEET L6-01. +/-
35' TO TOP OF RAIL +/- 44 +/- 35' TO TOP OF RAIL +/- 44 FRONT OF DUPLEX FRONT OF DUPLEX BACK OF DUPLEX PLAN DIAGRAM OF TOWN HOUSE UNITS PLAN DIAGRAM OF TOWN HOUSE UNITS EXISTING VEGETATION
EXISTING VEGETATION BOUNDARY SECTION 71 L5-05 BOUNDARY SECTION 8 L5-05 2 BACK OF DUPLEX FRONT OF DUPLEX SCREEN WALL - TYPE B SCREEN WALL - TYPE B 293 Item a. 18'100'15' 30' 22' CATOCTIN
CIRCLE HARRISON STREET SOUTH KING STREET B A E C D F CATOCTIN CIRCLE HARRISON STREET SOUTH KING STREET B A E C D F VIRGINIA VILLAGE KEANE ENTERPRISES 44031 PIPELINE PLAZA, SUITE 100
ASHBURN, VA 20147 2018138 BOUNDARY SECTIONS N/A KG, JG AN, SH JG, SH, AN L5-0610/26/2021 1:43 PM JOE GIANGRANDI G:\2018\2018138\CAD\EXHIBITS\ZONING PLANS\ZMA\8138 - SECT - SITE.DWG
AS NOTED SEAL SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE LANDDESIGN PROJ.# SCALE PROJECT NORTH NO. DESCRIPTION DATE REVISION / ISSUANCE ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE: 24" X 36" NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION VERT: HORZ:
CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: 200 S. PEYTON STREET ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314 703.549.7784 WWW.LANDDESIGN.COM 1 07.03.2019 ZMA 2 02.27.2020 ZMA 2ND SUB 3 09.25.2020 ZMA 3RD SUB 4 03.12.2021
ZMA 4TH SUB 5 06.29.2021 ZMA 5TH SUB 6 10.27.2021 ZMA 6TH SUB SECTION AS NOTED SECTION AS NOTED PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE EXISTING BUILDING RITE AID BARBER SHOP PARKING GARAGE BARBER
SHOP EXISTING BUILDING RITE AID BUFFER YARD #6 EXISTING VEGETATION OFFICE BUFFER YARD #6 MADISON HOUSE SECTION NOTES: 1. ARCHITECTURE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS FOR
ELEVATIONS. 2. FOR DESIGN INTENT OF FURNISHINGS AND FINISHES OF PAVING, WALLS, CROSSWALKS, SITE BENCHES, SITE BIKE RACKS, SITE WASTE RECEPTACLES AND SITE TRAFFIC DETERRENTS, SEE SHEET
L6-01. SECTION NOTES: 1. ARCHITECTURE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. SEE ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS FOR ELEVATIONS. 2. FOR DESIGN INTENT OF FURNISHINGS AND FINISHES OF PAVING, WALLS, CROSSWALKS, SITE
BENCHES, SITE BIKE RACKS, SITE WASTE RECEPTACLES AND SITE TRAFFIC DETERRENTS, SEE SHEET L6-01. PROPERTY LINE VIEW NORTH VIEW NORTH BOUNDARY SECTION 91 L5-06 BOUNDARY SECTION 10 L5-06
2 VIEW WEST VIEW WEST MADISON HOUSE OFFICE AREA TO BE PLANTED WITH TREES AND SHRUBBERY AREA TO BE PLANTED SHRUBBERY, GROUNDCOVERS, AND LAWN AREA TO BE PLANTED WITH TREES AND SHRUBBERY
AREA TO BE PLANTED WITH TREES AND SHRUBBERY AREA TO BE PLANTED SHRUBBERY, GROUNDCOVERS, AND LAWN PARKING EXISTING VEGETATION PARKING PROPERTY LINE 294 Item a. SITE WALL TYPOLOGIES1
L6-01 SEAL SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE LANDDESIGN PROJ.# SCALE PROJECT NORTH NO. DESCRIPTION DATE REVISION / ISSUANCE ORIGINAL SHEET SIZE: 24" X 36" NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION VERT: HORZ: CHECKED
BY: DRAWN BY: DESIGNED BY: 200 S. PEYTON STREET ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314 703.549.7784 WWW.LANDDESIGN.COM 1 07.03.2019 ZMA 2 02.27.2020 ZMA 2ND SUB 3 09.25.2020 ZMA 3RD SUB 4 03.12.2021
ZMA 4TH SUB 5 06.29.2021 ZMA 5TH SUB 6 10.27.2021 ZMA 6TH SUB VIRGINIA VILLAGE KEANE ENTERPRISES 44031 PIPELINE PLAZA, SUITE 100 ASHBURN, VA 20147 2018138 DETAILS + CHARACTER IMAGERY
N/A KG, JG AN, SH JG, SH, AN L6-0110/26/2021 1:44 PM JOE GIANGRANDI G:\2018\2018138\CAD\EXHIBITS\ZONING PLANS\ZMA\8138 - DETL_ILLST.DWG PICTORIAL PICTORIAL PICTORIAL PICTORIAL
PICTORIAL WALL FACE FINISH NTSL6-01 2 SITE PAVERS NTSL6-01 3 CURB RAMP AND CROSSWALK NTSL6-01 4 SITE BENCH SEATING NTSL6-01 5 SITE RECYCLE/LITTER CONTAINER NTSL6-01 6 SITE BIKE RACK
NTSL6-01 7 A WALL TYPOLOGIES SCREEN WALL TYPE B LOW RETAINING WALL RETAINING WALL WITH GUARDRAIL B C D WALL CAP COLUMN TREATMENT AT CORNERS AND/OR TERMINATIONS HEIGHT VARIES 6' TYP.
MIN MASONRY WALL GRADE BRICK CAP MASONRY WALL GRADE HEIGHT VARIES. 30" MAX METAL RAILING - PROVIDE ONLY WHEN WALL IS IN LOCATION WHERE GUARDRAIL IS WARRANTED FOR SAFETY REASONS WALL
CAP MASONRY WALL COLUMN TREATMENT AT CORNERS, TERMINATION AND/OR OTHER LOCATIONS ALONG THE WALL GRADE 42" MIN. HEIGHT VARIES, OVER 30" TYP. METAL RAILING B C D E F 6' TYP. SCREEN WALL
TYPE EE REMOVABLE WOOD SCREEN AT LOCATIONS WHERE EASEMENTS CROSS THROUGH BUFFERS WALL CAP COLUMN TREATMENT AT CORNERS AND/OR TERMINATIONS HEIGHT VARIES 6' TYP. MIN MASONRY WALL SCREEN
WALL TYPE FF NOTES: 1. SEE DETAIL 2, THIS SHEET FOR WALL MANSORY FACE FINISHES NOTES: 1. OR APPROVED EQUAL NOTES: 1. OR APPROVED EQUAL NOTES: 1. OR APPROVED EQUAL NOTES: 1. OR APPROVED
EQUAL NOTES: 1. OR APPROVED EQUAL NOTES: 1. OR APPROVED EQUAL PICTORIAL PICTORIAL TRAFFIC DETERRENT NTSL6-01 8 NOTES: 1. OR APPROVED EQUAL 6'-0" TO 12'-0" VARIES DOME PAVERS CONC. RAMP
CONC. DOME PAVERS CONC. RAMP PAVERS DOME PAVERS PAVERS RAMP PAVERS BRICK STAMPED CONC. STRIPED CROSSWALK:RAMP: PICTORIAL PICTORIAL MAILBOX NTSL6-01 8 295 Item a. MAX HEIGHT 49'-6" 38'-6"
296 Item a. MAX HEIGHT 49'-6" Finished Floor MAX HEIGHT 49'-6" 38'-6" MAX HEIGHT 49'-6" 38'-6" 297 Item a. MAX HEIGHT 49'-6" STACKED TH 298 Item a. MAX HEIGHT 49'-6" STACKED TH 299
Item a. MAX HEIGHT 49'-6" MAX HEIGHT 49'-6" STACKED TH 300 Item a. PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION TO PARKING POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL GLASS ZONE, TYP. (NOT CURRENTLY INCLUDED IN TRANSPARENCY CALCULATION)
SUBMISSION 1 JULY 8, 2019 SUBMISSION 2 SUBMISSION 3 FEBRUARY 27, 2020 SEPTEMBER 25, 2020 SUBMISSION 4 MARCH 12, 2021 SUBMISSION 5 SUBMISSION 6 JUNE 29, 2021 OCTOBER 27, 2021 A2-01 18037
BJS JV BUILDING A ELEVATIONS 2 1A T.O. Parapet Average Grade Level 2 Level 4 Level 3 Level 5 Roof 70’-0” Max. 2 BLDG. A SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE 1/16” = 1’-0” Mixed Use General Urban Commercial
Building Upper Level Transparency (Along Catoctin Cir. Frontage; Does not include steback facade) – 26% Minimum Transparency (Level 2 Floor to Roof) Secondary Front Facade: Lower level
transparency – 31% Minimum Transparency (Ground to level 2 floor) 3 CHARACTER IMAGES T.O. Parapet Average Grade Level 2 Level 4 Level 3 Level 5 Roof 70’-0” Max. Notes: 1. Retail and
egress doors are shown for illustrative purposes only. Final locations and quantity may vary but there shall be a minimum of one (1) entrance door for every retail tenant. Retail storefronts
and awnings are shown for illustrative purposes and subject to change after coordination with tenant layouts and requirements. 2. Architecture is schematic and will be refined with
final construction documents. 3. Any signage shown is illustrative and not for construction. Signage will be determined later in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance. 4. Elevator and
stair towers, air-conditioning units and all rooftop HVAC and mechanical equipment are not included in building height and will be treated per 10.4.6.C.4. Those shown are illustrative
and subject to revision. 1 BLDG. A EAST ELEVATION SCALE 1/16” = 1’-0” Mixed Use General Urban Commercial Building Upper Level Transparency – 28% Minimum Transparency (Level 2 Floor
to Roof) - (Does not Include inset Courtyard) Primary Front Facade: Lower level transparency – 50% Minimum Transparency (Ground to level 2 floor) MASONRY, TYP. CEMENTITIOUS SIDING,
TYP. STOREFRONT BY TENANT, TYP. CEMENTITIOUS SIDING, TYP. MASONRY, TYP. MASONRY TYP. CEMENTITIOUS SIDING, TYP. STOREFRONT BY TENANT, TYP. POTENTIAL AWNING BY TENANT, TYP. PARKING ENTRYPROFILE
OF EXISTING BUILDING MASONRY POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL GLASS ZONE, TYP. (NOT CURRENTLY INCLUDED IN TRANSPARENCY CALCULATION) MASONRY, TYP. 301 Item a. POTENTIAL AWNING BY TENANT, TYP. SUBMISSION
1 JULY 8, 2019 SUBMISSION 2 SUBMISSION 3 FEBRUARY 27, 2020 SEPTEMBER 25, 2020 SUBMISSION 4 MARCH 12, 2021 SUBMISSION 5 SUBMISSION 6 JUNE 29, 2021 OCTOBER 27, 2021 A2-02 18037 BJS JV
BUILDING A ELEVATIONS2 BLDG. A NORTH ELEVATION SCALE 1/16” = 1’-0” 2 Mixed Use General Urban Commercial Building Upper Level Transparency – 28% Minimum Transparency (Level 2 Floor to
Roof) Secondary Front Facade: Lower level transparency – 31% Minimum Transparency(Ground to level 2 floor) T.O. Parapet Average Grade Level 2 Level 4 Level 3 Level 5 Roof 70’-0” Max.
1 BLDG. A WEST ELEVATION SCALE 1/16” = 1’-0” Mixed Use General Urban Commercial Building Rear Facade - No transparancy requirement For reference 23% shown (Only includes endcaps on
west side of elevation) 1 Average Grade 70’-0” Max. Level 2 Level 4 Level 3 Level 5 Roof T.O. Parapet Notes: 1. Retail and egress doors are shown for illustrative purposes only. Final
locations and quantity may vary but there shall be a minimum of one (1) entrance door for every retail tenant. Retail storefronts and awnings are shown for illustrative purposes and
subject to change after coordination with tenant layouts and requirements. 2. Architecture is schematic and will be refined with final construction documents. 3. Any signage shown is
illustrative and not for construction. Signage will be determined later in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance. 4. Elevator and stair towers, air-conditioning units and all rooftop
HVAC and mechanical equipment are not included in building height and will be treated per 10.4.6.C.4. Those shown are illustrative and subject to revision. MASONRY, TYP. CEMENTITIOUS
SIDING, TYP. STOREFRONT BY TENANT, TYP. POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL GLASS ZONE, TYP. (NOT CURRENTLY INCLUDED IN TRANSPARENCY CALCULATION) LOADING PARKING ENTRY RESIDENTIAL ENTRY ALUMINUM STOREFRONT
SYSTEM, TYP. CEMENTITIOUS SIDING, TYP. MASONRY SEE A2-03 FOR PARKING STRUCTURE SCREENING OPTIONS MASONRY, TYP. PROFILE OF EXISTING BUILDING POTENTIAL WINDOWS PENDING FUTURE CODE ANALYSIS
OF FIRE SEPERATION FROM ADJACENT BUILDING 302 Item a. 2 BRICK VENEER -BLDG. A PERSPECTIVE VIEW 3 BRICK VENEER - CHARACTER IMAGE 8 PERFORATED METAL PANELS - BLDG. A PERSPECTIVE VIEW
9 PERFORATED METAL PANELS - CHARACTER IMAGE SCALE 1/16” = 1’-0” 5 FABRIC MESH - BLDG. A PERSPECTIVE VIEW 6 FABRIC MESH - CHARACTER IMAGE SUBMISSION 1 JULY 8, 2019 SUBMISSION 2 SUBMISSION
3 FEBRUARY 27, 2020 SEPTEMBER 25, 2020 SUBMISSION 4 MARCH 12, 2021 SUBMISSION 5 SUBMISSION 6 JUNE 29, 2021 OCTOBER 27, 2021 1 BRICK VENEER - BLDG. A WEST ELEVATION SCALE 1/16” = 1’-0”
4 FABRIC MESH - BLDG. A WEST ELEVATION SCALE 1/16” = 1’-0” 11 PERFORATED METAL MESH - BLDG. A PERSPECTIVE VIEW 12 PERFORATED METAL MESH - CHARACTER IMAGE SCALE 1/16” = 1’-0” 10 PERFORATED
METAL PANELS - BLDG. A WEST ELEVATION SCALE 1/16” = 1’-0” 7 PERFORATED METAL MESH - BLDG. A WEST ELEVATION SCALE 1/16” = 1’-0” BUILDING A PARKING SCREENING OPTIONS VARIATION IN PLANE
OF SCREEN VARIATION IN PLANE OF SCREEN VARIATION IN PLANE OF SCREEN VARIATION IN COLOR / PATTERN OF SCREEN VARIATION IN COLOR / PATTERN OF SCREEN VARIATION IN COLOR / PATTERN OF SCREEN
VARIATION IN PLANE OF SCREENVARIATION IN PLANE OF SCREEN VARIATION IN PLANE OF SCREEN A2-03 303 Item a. A2-04 18037 BJS JV BUILDING A PERSPECTIVES 2 BLDG. A VIEW FROM SOUTHEAST NOTE:
LANDSCAPING REMOVED FOR CLARITY 1 A 2 1 BLDG. A VIEW FROM NORTHEAST NOTE: LANDSCAPING REMOVED FOR CLARITY SUBMISSION 1 JULY 8, 2019 SUBMISSION 2 SUBMISSION 3 FEBRUARY 27, 2020 SEPTEMBER
25, 2020 SUBMISSION 4 MARCH 12, 2021 SUBMISSION 5 SUBMISSION 6 JUNE 29, 2021 OCTOBER 27, 2021 Notes: 1. Retail and egress doors are shown for illustrative purposes only. Final locations
and quantity may vary but there shall be a minimum of one (1) entrance door for every retail tenant. Retail storefronts and awnings are shown for illustrative purposes and subject to
change after coordination with tenant layouts and requirements. 2. Architecture is schematic and will be refined with final construction documents. 3. Any signage shown is illustrative
and not for construction. Signage will be determined later in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance. 4. Elevator and stair towers, air-conditioning units and all rooftop HVAC and mechanical
equipment are not included in building height and will be treated per 10.4.6.C.4. Those shown are illustrative and subject to revision. 304 Item a. Mixed Use General Urban Commercial
Building Upper Level Transparency: 40% Minimum Transparency Secondary Front Facade - Lower Level Transparency: 30% Minimum Transparency Wall adjacent to surface parking to be 4’-8”
min. above parking surface to block adjacent headlights Mixed Use General Urban Commercial Building For Reference - Upper Level Transparency: Approximately 45% shown Wall adjacent to
surface parking to be 4’-8” min. above parking surface to block adjacent headlights Mixed Use General Urban Commercial Building (Parking structure not included in trasparency calculations)
Upper Level Transparency: 41% Minimum Transparency (Level 2 Floor to Roof) Secondary Front Facade – Lower level transparency: 30% Minimum Transparency (Ground to level 2 floor) Wall
adjacent to surface parking to be 4’-8” min. above parking surface to block adjacent headlights STOREFRONT BY TENANT, TYP. POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL GLASS ZONE, TYP. (NOT CURRENTLY INCLUDED
IN TRANSPARENCY CALCULATION) SUBMISSION 1 JULY 8, 2019 SUBMISSION 2 SUBMISSION 3 FEBRUARY 27, 2020 SEPTEMBER 25, 2020 SUBMISSION 4 MARCH 12, 2021 SUBMISSION 5 SUBMISSION 6 JUNE 29,
2021 OCTOBER 27, 2021 A3-01 BUILDING B ELEVATIONS 70’-0” MAX Average Grade Level 2 Level 3 Roof T.O. High Parapet 2 BLDG. B WEST ELEVATION SCALE 1/16” = 1’-0” 1 BLDG. B SOUTH ELEVATION
SCALE 1/16” = 1’-0” General Urban Commercial Building Upper Level Transparency: 40% Minimum Transparency (Level 2 Floor to Roof) Primary Front Facade - Lower level transparency: 38%
Minimum Transparency (Ground to level 2 floor) 70’-0” MAX Average Grade Level 2 Level 3 Roof T.O. High Parapet 18037 BJS JV 1 2 4 B 3 Notes: 1. Retail and egress doors are shown for
illustrative purposes only. Final locations and quantity may vary but there shall be a minimum of one (1) entrance door for every retail tenant. Retail storefronts and awnings are shown
for illustrative purposes and subject to change after coordination with tenant layouts and requirements. 2. Architecture is schematic and will be refined with final construction documents.
3. Any signage shown is illustrative and not for construction. Signage will be determined later in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance. 4. Elevator and stair towers, air-conditioning
units and all rooftop HVAC and mechanical equipment are not included in building height and will be treated per 10.4.6.C.4. Those shown are illustrative and subject to revision. 4 BLDG.
B EAST ELEVATION SCALE 1/16” = 1’-0” 70’-0” MAX Average Grade Level 2 Level 3 Roof T.O. High Parapet MASONRY, TYP.MASONRY, TYP. 3 BLDG. B NORTH ELEVATION SCALE 1/16” = 1’-0” 70’-0”
MAX Average Grade Level 2 Level 3 Roof T.O. High Parapet MASONRY, TYP. 6 CHARACTER IMAGES MASONRY, TYP.METAL SPANDREL, TYP. PARKING ENTRY PARKING ENTRY LOADING MASONRY, TYP.METAL SPANDREL,
TYP. METAL SPANDREL, TYP. METAL SPANDREL, TYP. 305 Item a. A3-02 18037 BJS JV BUILDING B PERSPECTIVES 2 BLDG. B VIEW FROM NOTE: LANDSCAPING REMOVED FOR CLARITY 1 BLDG. B VIEW FROM SOUTHWEST
NOTE: LANDSCAPING REMOVED FOR CLARITY SUBMISSION 1 JULY 8, 2019 SUBMISSION 2 SUBMISSION 3 FEBRUARY 27, 2020 SEPTEMBER 25, 2020 SUBMISSION 4 MARCH 12, 2021 SUBMISSION 5 SUBMISSION 6
JUNE 29, 2021 OCTOBER 27, 2021 Notes: 1. Retail and egress doors are shown for illustrative purposes only. Final locations and quantity may vary but there shall be a minimum of one
(1) entrance door for every retail tenant. Retail storefronts and awnings are shown for illustrative purposes and subject to change after coordination with tenant layouts and requirements.
2. Architecture is schematic and will be refined with final construction documents. 3. Any signage shown is illustrative and not for construction. Signage will be determined later in
accordance with the Zoning Ordinance. 4. Elevator and stair towers, air-conditioning units and all rooftop HVAC and mechanical equipment are not included in building height and will
be treated per 10.4.6.C.4. Those shown are illustrative and subject to revision. 1 2 B 306 Item a. 4 BLDG. C WEST ELEVATION SCALE 1/16” = 1’-0” General Urban Commercial Building Upper
Level Transparency – 25% Minimum Transparency (Level 2 Floor to Roof) Primary Front Facade: Lower level transparency – 42% Minimum Transparency (Level 1 to level 2 floor) MASONRY, TYP.
MASONRY, TYP. METAL PANEL / CEMENTITIOUS SIDING MASONRY, TYP. MASONRY, TYP. MASONRY, TYP. ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM METAL PANEL / CEMENTITIOUS SIDING METAL
PANEL / CEMENTITIOUS SIDING METAL PANEL / CEMENTITIOUS SIDING MASONRY, TYP. SUBMISSION 1 JULY 8, 2019 SUBMISSION 2 SUBMISSION 3 FEBRUARY 27, 2020 SEPTEMBER 25, 2020 SUBMISSION 4 MARCH
12, 2021 SUBMISSION 5 SUBMISSION 6 JUNE 29, 2021 OCTOBER 27, 2021 A4-01 18037 BJS JV BUILDING C ELEVATIONS 1 3 2 4 C 1 BLDG. C SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE 1/16” = 1’-0” 3 BLDG. C NORTH ELEVATION
SCALE 1/16” = 1’-0” 2 BLDG. C EAST ELEVATION SCALE 1/16” = 1’-0” 56’-0” +/70’’-0” Max. 14’-0” +/Average Grade Level 2 Level 3 Roof T.O. Parapet Roof Terrace / Amenity 70’’-0” Max. 14’-0”
+/- 56’-0” +/Average Grade Level 2 Level 3 Roof Terrace / Amenity Roof T.O. Parapet General Urban Commercial Building Upper Level Transparency – 23% Minimum Transparency (Level 2 Floor
to Roof) Secondary Front Facade: Lower level transparency – 30% Minimum Transparency (Level 1 to level 2 floor) General Urban Commercial Building – Secondary Front Facade: 23% Minimum
Transparency (Level 1 to Roof) General Urban Commercial Building Upper Level Transparency – 27% Minimum Transparency (Level 2 Floor to Roof) Secondary Interior Facade: Lower level
transparency – 1v0% Minimum Transparency (Level 1 to level 2 floor) 70’’-0” Max. 14’-0” +/- 56’-0” +/Average Grade Level 2 Level 3 Roof T.O. Parapet Roof Terrace / Amenity 70’’-0”
Max. 14’-0” +/- 56 ’-0” +/Average Grade Level 2 Level 3 Roof T.O. Parapet Roof Terrace / Amenity Notes: 1. Retail and egress doors are shown for illustrative purposes only. Final locations
and quantity may vary but there shall be a minimum of one (1) entrance door for every retail tenant. Retail storefronts and awnings are shown for illustrative purposes and subject to
change after coordination with tenant layouts and requirements. 2. Architecture is schematic and will be refined with final construction documents. 3. Any signage shown is illustrative
and not for construction. Signage will be determined later in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance. 4. Elevator and stair towers, air-conditioning units and all rooftop HVAC and mechanical
equipment are not included in building height and will be treated per 10.4.6.C.4. Those shown are illustrative and subject to revision. 5 CHARACTER IMAGES 307 Item a. A4-02 18037 BJS
JV BUILDING C PERSPECTIVES 2 BLDG. C VIEW FROM SOUTHEAST NOTE: LANDSCAPING REMOVED FOR CLARITY 1 BLDG. C VIEW FROM SOUTHWEST NOTE: LANDSCAPING REMOVED FOR CLARITY SUBMISSION 1 JULY
8, 2019 SUBMISSION 2 SUBMISSION 3 FEBRUARY 27, 2020 SEPTEMBER 25, 2020 SUBMISSION 4 MARCH 12, 2021 SUBMISSION 5 SUBMISSION 6 JUNE 29, 2021 OCTOBER 27, 2021 Notes: 1. Retail and egress
doors are shown for illustrative purposes only. Final locations and quantity may vary but there shall be a minimum of one (1) entrance door for every retail tenant. Retail storefronts
and awnings are shown for illustrative purposes and subject to change after coordination with tenant layouts and requirements. 2. Architecture is schematic and will be refined with
final construction documents. 3. Any signage shown is illustrative and not for construction. Signage will be determined later in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance. 4. Elevator and
stair towers, air-conditioning units and all rooftop HVAC and mechanical equipment are not included in building height and will be treated per 10.4.6.C.4. Those shown are illustrative
and subject to revision. 2 1 C 308 Item a. MASONRY, TYP. MASONRY, TYP. STONE / MASONRY / PRECAST CONCRETE CEMENTITIOUS PANEL, TYP. Notes: 1. Retail and egress doors are shown for illustrative
purposes only. Final locations and quantity may vary but there shall be a minimum of one (1) entrance door for every retail tenant. Retail storefronts and awnings are shown for illustrative
purposes and subject to change after coordination with tenant layouts and requirements. 2. Architecture is schematic and will be refined with final construction documents. 3. Any signage
shown is illustrative and not for construction. Signage will be determined later in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance. 4. Elevator and stair towers, air-conditioning units and all
rooftop HVAC and mechanical equipment are not included in building height and will be treated per 10.4.6.C.4. Those shown are illustrative and subject to revision. SUBMISSION 1 JULY
8, 2019 SUBMISSION 2 SUBMISSION 3 FEBRUARY 27, 2020 SEPTEMBER 25, 2020 SUBMISSION 4 MARCH 12, 2021 SUBMISSION 5 SUBMISSION 6 JUNE 29, 2021 OCTOBER 27, 2021 A5-01 18037 BJS JV BUILDING
D ELEVATIONS 1 BLDG. D EAST ELEVATION SCALE 1/16” = 1’-0” Residential Building Secondary Front facade - 23% Minimum Transparency (P1 Floor to Roof) 2 BLDG. D NORTH ELEVATION SCALE 1/16”
= 1’-0” Residential Building Interior/Side Facade – No Transparency Requirement per 7.10.6.G.4 – For reference approximately 28% transparency shown (Level 1 to Roof) 4 BLDG. D WEST
ELEVATION SCALE 1/16” = 1’-0” 3 BLDG. D SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE 1/16” = 1’-0” D 1 4 3 2 70’-0” Max. 70’-0” Max. 70’-0” Max. Level 3 Level 3 Level 3 Level 2 Level 2 Level 2 Level 1 Level
1 Level 1 P1 Level P1 Level P1 Level Average Grade Average Grade Average Grade Level 4 Level 4 Level 4 Roof T.O. Parapet Roof T.O. Parapet Roof T.O. Parapet T.O. Parapet 70’-0” Max.
Level 3 Level 2 Level 1 P1 Level Average Grade Level 4 Roof Residential Building Primary Front Facade – 25% minimum per 7.10.6.G.4 - Approximately 30% transparency shown (Level 1 to
Roof) Residential Building Secondary Front Facade – 25% minimum per 7.10.6.G.4 - Approximately 38% transparency shown (Grade to Roof) 5 CHARACTER IMAGES MASONRY, TYP. ALUMINUM STOREFRONT
SYSTEM, TYP. MASONRY, TYP. CEMENTITIOUS PANEL, TYP. MASONRY, TYP. MASONRY, TYP. ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM, TYP. CEMENTITIOUS PANEL, TYP. MASONRY, TYP. CEMENTITIOUS PANEL, TYP. 309
Item a. A5-02 18037 BJS JV BUILDING D PERSPECTIVES 2 BLDG. D VIEW FROM SOUTHWEST NOTE: LANDSCAPING REMOVED FOR CLARITY 1 BLDG. D VIEW FROM NORTHWEST NOTE: LANDSCAPING REMOVED FOR CLARITY
Notes: 1. Retail and egress doors are shown for illustrative purposes only. Final locations and quantity may vary but there shall be a minimum of one (1) entrance door for every retail
tenant. Retail storefronts and awnings are shown for illustrative purposes and subject to change after coordination with tenant layouts and requirements. 2. Architecture is schematic
and will be refined with final construction documents. 3. Any signage shown is illustrative and not for construction. Signage will be determined later in accordance with the Zoning
Ordinance. 4. Elevator and stair towers, air-conditioning units and all rooftop HVAC and mechanical equipment are not included in building height and will be treated per 10.4.6.C.4.
Those shown are illustrative and subject to revision. SUBMISSION 1 JULY 8, 2019 SUBMISSION 2 SUBMISSION 3 FEBRUARY 27, 2020 SEPTEMBER 25, 2020 SUBMISSION 4 MARCH 12, 2021 SUBMISSION
5 SUBMISSION 6 JUNE 29, 2021 OCTOBER 27, 2021 D 1 2 310 Item a. MASONRY, TYP. CEMENTITIOUS PANEL, TYP. METAL / CEMENTITIOUS PANEL, TYP. MASONRY, TYP.MASONRY, TYP. CEMENTITIOUS PANEL,
TYP. METAL / CEMENTITIOUS PANEL, TYP. METAL / CEMENTITIOUS PANEL, TYP. SUBMISSION 1 JULY 8, 2019 SUBMISSION 2 SUBMISSION 3 FEBRUARY 27, 2020 SEPTEMBER 25, 2020 SUBMISSION 4 MARCH 12,
2021 SUBMISSION 5 SUBMISSION 6 JUNE 29, 2021 OCTOBER 27, 2021 A6-01 18037 BJS JV BUILDING E ELEVATIONS 1 BLDG. E SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE 1/16” = 1’-0” 1 70’-0” Max. Level 5 Level 4 Level
3 Level 2 Level 1 Average Grade Level 6 Roof T.O. Parapet Mixed Use General Urban Commercial Building Upper Level Transparency – 25% Minimum (Level 3 Floor to Roof) Secondary Front
Facade: Lower level transparency – 37% Minimum Transparency (Ground to residential floor above) Residential Building Secondary Front Facade – 25% minimum per 7.10.6.G.4 - Approximately
28% transparency shown (Level 1 to Roof) E 2 70’-0” Max. Level 5 Level 4 Level 3 Level 2 Level 1 Average Grade Level 6 Roof T.O. Parapet 3 CHARACTER IMAGES Notes: 1. Retail and egress
doors are shown for illustrative purposes only. Final locations and quantity may vary but there shall be a minimum of one (1) entrance door for each retail tenant. Retail storefronts
and awnings are shown for illustrative purposes and subject to change after coordination with tenant layouts and requirements. 2. Architecture is schematic and will be refined with
final construction documents. 3. Any signage shown is illustrative and not for construction. Signage will be determined later in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance. 4. Elevator and
stair towers, air-conditioning units and all rooftop HVAC and mechanical equipment are not included in building height and will be treated per 10.4.6.C.4. Those shown are illustrative
and subject to revision. 3 BLDG. E East ELEVATION SCALE 1/16” = 1’-0” Residential Building Secondary Front Facade – 25% minimum per 7.10.6.G.4 - Approximately 38% transparency shown
(Grade to Roof) STOREFRONT BY TENANT, TYP. POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL GLASS ZONE, TYP. (NOT CURRENTLY INCLUDED IN TRANSPARENCY CALCULATION) PARKING ENTRANCE RESIDENTIAL ENTRY POTENTIAL AWNING
BY TENANT, TYP. 311 Item a. 2 BLDG. E WEST ELEVATION SCALE 1/16” = 1’-0” 70’-0” Max. Level 5 Level 4 Level 3 Level 1 Average Grade Level 6 Roof T.O. Parapet Mixed Use General Urban
Commercial Building Upper Level Transparency – 25% Minimum (Level 3 Floor to Roof; setback courtyard not included) Primary Front Facade: Lower level transparency – 42% Minimum Transparency
(Ground to residential floor above) PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION TO PARKING MASONRY, TYP.METAL / CEMENTITIOUS PANEL, TYP. STOREFRONT BY TENANT, TYP. MASONRY, TYP. MASONRY, TYP. METAL / CEMENTITIOUS
PANEL, TYP. METAL / CEMENTITIOUS PANEL, TYP. Notes: 1. Retail and egress doors are shown for illustrative purposes only. Final locations and quantity may vary but there shall be a minimum
of one (1) entrance door for each retail tenant. Retail storefronts and awnings are shown for illustrative purposes and subject to change after coordination with tenant layouts and
requirements. 2. Architecture is schematic and will be refined with final construction documents. 3. Any signage shown is illustrative and not for construction. Signage will be determined
later in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance. 4. Elevator and stair towers, air-conditioning units and all rooftop HVAC and mechanical equipment are not included in building height
and will be treated per 10.4.6.C.4. Those shown are illustrative and subject to revision. SUBMISSION 1 JULY 8, 2019 SUBMISSION 2 SUBMISSION 3 FEBRUARY 27, 2020 SEPTEMBER 25, 2020 SUBMISSION
4 MARCH 12, 2021 SUBMISSION 5 SUBMISSION 6 JUNE 29, 2021 OCTOBER 27, 2021 A6-02 18037 BJS JV BUILDING E ELEVATIONS E 2 1 1 BLDG. E NORTH ELEVATION SCALE 1/16” = 1’-0” Roof T.O. Parapet
Level 5 Level 4 Level 3 Level 1 Average Grade Level 6 Mixed Use General Urban Commercial Building Upper Level Transparency – 25% Minimum (Level 3 floor to roof) Secondary Front Facade:
Lower level transparency – 31% Minimum Transparencyn (Ground to residential floor above) Residential Building Secondary Front Facade – 25% minimum per 7.10.6.G.4 Approximately 29%
transparency shown (Level 1 to Roof) 70’-0” Max. PARKING ENTRANCE LOADING SECONDARY RESIDENTIAL ENTRY STOREFRONT BY TENANT, TYP. POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL GLASS ZONE, TYP. (NOT CURRENTLY
INCLUDED IN TRANSPARENCY CALCULATION) CEMENTITIOUS SIDING, TYP. POTENTIAL AWNING BY TENANT, TYP. 312 Item a. A6-03 18037 BJS JV BUILDING E PERSPECTIVES 2 BLDG. E VIEW FROM SOUTHEAST
NOTE: LANDSCAPING REMOVED FOR CLARITY 1 BLDG. E VIEW FROM SOUTHWEST NOTE: LANDSCAPING REMOVED FOR CLARITY Notes: 1. Retail and egress doors are shown for illustrative purposes only.
Final locations and quantity may vary but there shall be a minimum of one (1) entrance door for each retail tenant. Retail storefronts and awnings are shown for illustrative purposes
and subject to change after coordination with tenant layouts and requirements. 2. Architecture is schematic and will be refined with final construction documents. 3. Any signage shown
is illustrative and not for construction. Signage will be determined later in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance. 4. Elevator and stair towers, air-conditioning units and all rooftop
HVAC and mechanical equipment are not included in building height and will be treated per 10.4.6.C.4. Those shown are illustrative and subject to revision. SUBMISSION 1 JULY 8, 2019
SUBMISSION 2 SUBMISSION 3 FEBRUARY 27, 2020 SEPTEMBER 25, 2020 SUBMISSION 4 MARCH 12, 2021 SUBMISSION 5 SUBMISSION 6 JUNE 29, 2021 OCTOBER 27, 2021 E 1 2 313 Item a. SUBMISSION 1 JULY
8, 2019 SUBMISSION 2 SUBMISSION 3 FEBRUARY 27, 2020 SEPTEMBER 25, 2020 SUBMISSION 4 MARCH 12, 2021 SUBMISSION 5 SUBMISSION 6 JUNE 29, 2021 OCTOBER 27, 2021 A7-01 18037 BJS JV BUILDING
F ELEVATIONS 25’-0” +/Midpoint of pitched roof Wall Plate Average Grade 25’-0” +/Midpoint of pitched roof Wall Plate Average Grade 4 F 3 2 1 25’-0” +/Midpoint of pitched roof Wall Plate
Average Grade 25’-0” +/Midpoint of pitched roof Wall Plate Average Grade 2 BLDG. F NORTH ELEVATION SCALE 1/8” = 1’-0” General Urban Commercial Building Rear Facade No transparancy requirement
For reference: 13% Minimum Transparency (Ground to Wall Plate) 3 BLDG. F WEST ELEVATION SCALE 1/8” = 1’-0” General Urban Commercial Building Secondary Front Facade: Lower level transparency
– 33% Minimum Transparency (Ground to Wall Plate) General Urban Commercial Building Primary Front Facade: Lower level transparency – 31% Minimum Transparency (Ground to Wall Plate)
4 BLDG. F SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE 1/8” = 1’-0” 1 BLDG. F EAST ELEVATION SCALE 1/8” = 1’-0” General Urban Commercial Building Rear Facade No transparancy requirement For reference: Approximately
16% transparency shown (Ground to Wall Plate) ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM 5 CHARACTER IMAGES Notes: 1. Retail and egress doors are shown for illustrative purposes only. Final locations
and quantity may vary but there shall be a minimum of one (1) entrance door for each retail tenant. Retail storefronts and awnings are shown for illustrative purposes and subject to
change after coordination with tenant layouts and requirements. 2. Architecture is schematic and will be refined with final construction documents. 3. Any signage shown is illustrative
and not for construction. Signage will be determined later in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance. 4. Elevator and stair towers, air-conditioning units and all rooftop HVAC and mechanical
equipment are not included in building height and will be treated per 10.4.6.C.4. Those shown are illustrative and subject to revision. MASONRY, TYP. (SHOWN PAINTED) MASONRY, TYP. (SHOWN
PAINTED) MASONRY, TYP. (SHOWN PAINTED) MASONRY, TYP. (SHOWN PAINTED) METAL / CEMENTITIOUS SIDING ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM MASONRY, TYP. (SHOWN PAINTED) ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM
METAL ROOF METAL ROOF METAL ROOF METAL / CEMENTITIOUS SIDING METAL / CEMENTITIOUS SIDING METAL / CEMENTITIOUS SIDING 314 Item a. A7-02 18037 BJS JV BUILDING F PERSPECTIVES 2 BLDG. F
VIEW FROM NORTHWEST NOTE: LANDSCAPING REMOVED FOR CLARITY 1 BLDG. F VIEW FROM SOUTHWEST NOTE: LANDSCAPING REMOVED FOR CLARITY Notes: 1. Retail and egress doors are shown for illustrative
purposes only. Final locations and quantity may vary but there shall be a minimum of one (1) entrance door for each retail tenant. Retail storefronts and awnings are shown for illustrative
purposes and subject to change after coordination with tenant layouts and requirements. 2. Architecture is schematic and will be refined with final construction documents. 3. Any signage
shown is illustrative and not for construction. Signage will be determined later in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance. 4. Elevator and stair towers, air-conditioning units and all
rooftop HVAC and mechanical equipment are not included in building height and will be treated per 10.4.6.C.4. Those shown are illustrative and subject to revision. SUBMISSION 1 JULY
8, 2019 SUBMISSION 2 SUBMISSION 3 FEBRUARY 27, 2020 SEPTEMBER 25, 2020 SUBMISSION 4 MARCH 12, 2021 SUBMISSION 5 SUBMISSION 6 JUNE 29, 2021 OCTOBER 27, 2021 F 2 1 315 Item a. 18037 BJS
JV GROUND LEVEL LOADING PARKING 2 SPACES2 SPACES 1 SPACE 1 SPACE 1 SPACE Notes: 1. Retail and egress doors are shown for illustrative purposes only. Final locations and quantity may
vary but there shall be a minimum of one (1) entrance door for each retail tenant. Retail storefronts and awnings are shown for illustrative purposes and subject to change after coordination
with tenant layouts and requirements. 2. Architecture is schematic and will be refined with final construction documents. 3. Any signage shown is illustrative and not for construction.
Signage will be determined later in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance. 4. Elevator and stair towers, air-conditioning units and all rooftop HVAC and mechanical equipment are not
included in building height and will be treated per 10.4.6.C.4. Those shown are illustrative and subject to revision. SUBMISSION 1 JULY 8, 2019 SUBMISSION 2 SUBMISSION 3 FEBRUARY 27,
2020 SEPTEMBER 25, 2020 SUBMISSION 4 MARCH 12, 2021 SUBMISSION 5 SUBMISSION 6 JUNE 29, 2021 OCTOBER 27, 2021 316 Item a. 18037 BJS JV SUBMISSION 1 JULY 8, 2019 SUBMISSION 2 SUBMISSION
3 FEBRUARY 27, 2020 SEPTEMBER 25, 2020 SUBMISSION 4 MARCH 12, 2021 SUBMISSION 5 SUBMISSION 6 JUNE 29, 2021 OCTOBER 27, 2021 317 Item a. 18037 BJS JV SUBMISSION 1 JULY 8, 2019 SUBMISSION
2 SUBMISSION 3 FEBRUARY 27, 2020 SEPTEMBER 25, 2020 SUBMISSION 4 MARCH 12, 2021 SUBMISSION 5 SUBMISSION 6 JUNE 29, 2021 OCTOBER 27, 2021 318 Item a. 18037 BJS JV 18037 BJS JV SUBMISSION
1 JULY 8, 2019 SUBMISSION 2 SUBMISSION 3 FEBRUARY 27, 2020 SEPTEMBER 25, 2020 SUBMISSION 4 MARCH 12, 2021 SUBMISSION 5 SUBMISSION 6 JUNE 29, 2021 OCTOBER 27, 2021 319 Item a. Economic
Development Commission 25 West Market Street• Leesburg, Virginia 20176 • phone: 703-771 -6530 • fax: 703-77 1-2727 • www.leesburgva.gov EDC RECOMMENDATION ON VIRGINIA VILLAGE REZONING
TLZM-2019-0001 Leesburg Mayor and Members of Town Council: The Economic Development Commission, at our regular meeting on January 5, 2022 discussed the rezoning application for Virginia
Village, as requested by Town Council. With a 5-1-1 vote the commission recommends the following: The EDC supports the Virginia Village Redevelopment Project with a strong recommendation
that Phase 2C be moved to the Phase 2A position using whatever methods are available to Council including incentives. Respectfully, Eric L. Byrd, Chair Town of Leesburg Economic Development
Commission 320 Item a. Date of Council Meeting: January 11, 2022 TOWN OF LEESBURG TOWN COUNCIL MEETING Subject: TLOA-2021-0005, Administrative Approval of COAs in H-1 Old and Historic
District Staff Contact: Lauren Murphy, Preservation Planner Michael Watkins, Zoning Administrator Council Action Requested: Adoption of Zoning Ordinance Amendment TLOA-2021-0005
Administrative Approval of COAs in the Old and Historic District Staff Recommendation: Approval of the zoning ordinance text amendments to Article 7.5.6 Administrative Approvals of
Certificates of Appropriateness as presented in the November 4, 2021 Planning Commission Public Hearing Staff Report. The November 4, 2021 Planning Commission Staff Report can be found
at the following link: https://app.laserfiche.com/laserfiche/DocView.aspx?db=r165d21d4&docid=551041#?openmode=PDF Staff recommends support of the proposed alterations to the existing
ordinance. The overall number of items which would be eligible for administrative review have been greatly increased. The revised ordinance is more user friendly and eliminates existing
confusion. The revised ordinance will allow for more efficient processing of simple applications which are clearly consistent with the Old and Historic District Guidelines thereby
allowing greater flexibility in the timing of projects for historic district property owners while simultaneously allowing more flexibility for the Board of Architectural Review to
devote public meeting time to other projects. Commission Recommendation: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on November 4, 2021. No members of the public spoke to this
application. The public hearing was closed on November 4, 2021. There was no discussion by the Planning Commission, and the Commission voted to recommend approval by a vote of 5-0-1.
BAR Recommendation: The Board of Architectural Review (BAR) reviewed these amendments at their August 2, 2021, and September 8, 2021 work sessions. The BAR recommended approval of
these amendments at their meeting on October 4, 2021 by a vote of 5-0-2. Fiscal Impact: No fiscal impact analysis was conducted as part of this amendment. Work Plan Impact: The approval
of this amendment will not negatively affect the work plan for the Department of Planning and Zoning. Executive Summary: The proposed amendments to Article 7.5.6 Administrative Approvals
of Certificates of Appropriateness will expand the number of projects eligible for administrative review 321 Item a. TLOA-2021-0005, Administrative Approval of COA’s in the H-1 Old
and Historic District January 11, 2022 Page 2 in the Old and Historic District by the Preservation Planner without the requirement for a full public hearing and review by the Board
of Architectural Review (BAR). This amendment provides greater flexibility for historic district applicants by increasing the allowable projects eligible for administrative review
while simultaneously helping to manage the workload of the BAR by reducing agenda items and allowing for additional time for other projects. Background: The Zoning Ordinance currently
allows a limited list of Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) applications to be reviewed and approved administratively by the Preservation Planner. At their June 22, 2021 meeting,
Town Council initiated a zoning ordinance amendment for administrative reviews of COAs to expand the eligible projects which may be reviewed by the Preservation Planner without the
requirement for a full public hearing and review by the Board of Architectural Review (BAR). See Attachment #2. The following areas of amendment were raised to the Council for possible
inclusion in the ordinance: Minor amendments to approved COA’s. Minor Alterations to small architectural details Gutters/downspouts Awnings Walkways Landscape Features
In-kind replacements Small cells In order to prepare this ordinance amendment, staff reviewed consent agenda cases (those approved by the BAR without deliberation or discussion)
over the last two years and reviewed the administrative approval ordinances in Loudoun County and the City of Alexandria. The revised ordinance offers substantially more flexibility
for applicants in the historic district while ensuring that more complicated projects which have a wider impact on the character of the Old and Historic District are reviewed by the
BAR. A. Building & Site Enhancements: The current ordinance allows actions to be approved administratively. The revised draft text as recommended by the BAR will increase the allowed
actions eligible for administrative approval if they are consistent with the Guidelines. Existing Ordinance: Article 7.5.6 of the ordinance currently allows the following site features
to be approved administratively: lampposts light fixtures fences driveways residential walkways 322 Item a. TLOA-2021-0005, Administrative Approval of COA’s in the H-1 Old
and Historic District January 11, 2022 Page 3 changes in exterior color schemes bollards and other traffic control structures outside the public right of way Proposal: The proposed
language will add the following items in addition to those already in the ordinance: Walkways (no longer limited to only residential) In-ground pools in the rear yard Patios
less than 250 square feet when they are in the rear yard Retaining, seating, or landscape walls of not more than 24 inches in height if they are not attached to a primary structure
Trash enclosures Pergolas (or similar unenclosed garden structures) in the rear yard Mechanical screening, such as vents, measuring less than 1 cubic foot that match the surrounding
material in color Small cell installations which are located on existing poles within the right-of-way and are designed in accordance with the adopted franchise agreement Accessory
structures of less than 100 square feet located in the rear yard, less than 15’ to the peak of the roof in height, not on a permanent foundation and not to exceed one such structure
Analysis: The revised request encompasses many of the types of applications which currently require BAR review and are approved on the consent agenda (without discussion) or are swiftly
approved by the BAR. In developing the draft ordinance for review by the BAR, staff also compared the existing Leesburg Ordinance to surrounding jurisdictions (Loudoun County, City
of Alexandria, and Town of Middleburg) to help bring the ordinance in line with other Northern Virginia historic districts (primarily Loudoun County and Alexandria as Town of Middleburg
does not allow any administrative approvals). As with all administrative approvals, these items must be consistent with the adopted design Guidelines to be eligible for administrative
approval. The revised ordinance more than doubles the number of allowable actions in this category which achieves the desired goal of allowing additional flexibility. B. Modifications
to Existing Structures: As with site features, the revised draft ordinance seeks to allow additional alterations to existing structures beyond those which are already authorized in
the existing ordinance. Existing Ordinance: Article 7.5.6 of the ordinance currently allows the following site features to be approved administratively: The like-kind replacement
of roof materials The installation of storm windows and doors The replacement or installation of new shutters Installation of HVAC units and associated support structures
Utility-related improvements. 323 Item a. TLOA-2021-0005, Administrative Approval of COA’s in the H-1 Old and Historic District January 11, 2022 Page 4 In addition, the Preservation
Planner has the authority to approve the change in appearance of gutters, downspouts, attic vents and exterior doors on noncontributing resources only Proposed text: The revised text
dramatically increases the number of modifications to existing buildings which can seek administrative approval by expanding eligible projects for both contributing and non-contributing
structures. For contributing structures, the revised text now defines contributing structure which was not previously defined, and allows the following new actions in addition to
those already permitted in the Ordinance: Like-kind replacement of roof materials, siding, trim, railings, gutters, or downspouts, porch flooring or stair risers/treads but not porch
railings, columns or posts Installation or removal of storm windows and doors Removal, replacement or installation of shutters Installation of HVAC units and associated support
structures or other utility-related improvements Removal of non-contributing material and the necessary repair/maintenance following such removal Minor alterations or installations
of architectural details including: o Handrails but not guardrails or porch railings or balustrades o Lattice o Decorative trim such as modillions, corbels or similar Removal or recovering
of awnings For non-contributing structures: The revised text also defines non-contributing structure whereas no definition exists today and allows the following additional modifications
beyond what is already authorized in the existing text: Like Kind replacement of siding, trim, porch flooring or stair risers/treads, porch posts or railings Gutters (including
changes in gutter style or material when the new proposal is equally or more consistent with the Guidelines than the current) Roofing (including changes in roofing material when the
new material is equally consistent or more consistent with the Guidelines than the current sheathing) Exterior doors Installation or removal of storm windows and doors Removal,
replacement or installation of shutters Installation of HVAC units and associated support structures or other utility-related improvements Minor alterations or installations of
architectural details including: o Handrails, guardrails, balustrades, or porch railings o Lattice o Decorative trim such as corbels, modillions, or similar Removal or recovering
of awnings Demolition of non-contributing accessory structures 324 Item a. TLOA-2021-0005, Administrative Approval of COA’s in the H-1 Old and Historic District January 11, 2022 Page
5 Analysis: The revised draft text again dramatically increases the allowable actions for administrative approval provided that such actions are consistent with the Guidelines. These
newly added actions will allow greater flexibility for property owners seeking to make minor alterations to their properties within the historic district. Staff finds that these additional
actions eligible for administrative approval are in keeping with other local jurisdictions and are reflective of the types of frequent applications submitted for BAR review under the
current ordinance and approved on the consent agenda without deliberation by the Board. C. Change of Plans After Issuance of COA – The majority of COAs reviewed and approved by the
BAR have not yet been formally reviewed by the Loudoun County building official or Town of Leesburg zoning for permitting and code compliance. This often results in minor tweaks and
changes to the approved COA after the BAR has completed their review and issued an approval. The revised text seeks to broaden the types of changes allowed after the BAR has approved
the primary COA. Existing Ordinance: The existing ordinance allows the following changes to a previously approved COA to be approved administratively: change in the color of brick
selected for a project change in the profile of door and window moldings change in the type of siding used in a small area, which does not exceed ten percent (10%) of the total
area of a building change in the style of a door or window change in roof material as long as historic roof materials are not removed repositioning, or enlargement/reduction no
greater than 10% in the size of a non-historic doorway or window opening, on a secondary resource or on the rear of a primary resource repositioning, changes in balustrade (guardrail),
or enlargement/reduction no greater than 10% in the size of a porch or outdoor staircase on a secondary resource or on the rear of a primary resource Proposed text: The revised list
of allowable administrative actions following BAR approval is as follows: 1. Change in the color(s) selected for a project (for any color scheme, not just brick as currently allowed)
2. Change in the profile of door and window moldings 3. Change in the type of siding used in a small area (no longer limited to the 10% calculation) 4. Repositioning, or enlargement/reduction
in the size of a non-historic doorway or window opening, on an accessory structure or on the rear of a primary structure (no longer limited to the 10% calculation) 5. Change in roof
material if historic roof materials are not removed 6. Repositioning, or changes in balustrade (guardrail), railings (including handrails), corbels or other decorative porch ornamentation
7. Enlargement/reduction no greater than 10% in the size of a porch or outdoor staircase on an accessory structure or on the rear of a primary structure 325 Item a. TLOA-2021-0005,
Administrative Approval of COA’s in the H-1 Old and Historic District January 11, 2022 Page 6 8. Other minor alterations determined by the Preservation Planner which do not negatively
affect the size, scale, massing, or character of the structure Analysis: The revised list is similar to the existing allowed list of modifications. In practice, most requests for
changes after a COA was already issued are typically much more substantial alterations which will continue to require BAR review. The revised list offers greater flexibility, especially
in number 8, and eliminates most of the 10% calculations which can make such applications burdensome for applicants to demonstrate they meet the threshold for administrative review.
The BAR eliminated the existing “change in style of door or window” line item. This item is rarely used and could be ambiguously interpreted by different preservation planners. Staff
therefore supports its removal. Truly minor alterations to an approved design can otherwise be captured with new #8. ORDINANCE Amending Zoning Ordinance Article 7.5.6 Administrative
Review of Certificates of Appropriateness to Amend the Allowable Projects for Administrative Review in the Old and Historic District Draft Motions: 1. I move to approve TLOA-2021-0005
amending Article 7.5.6 of the Zoning Ordinance for Administrative Review of Certificates of Appropriateness. 2. I move to deny TLOA-2021-0005 amending Article 7.5.6 of the Zoning
Ordinance for Administrative Review of Certificates of Appropriateness. 3. I move an alternate motion. Attachment/s: 1. Draft Ordinance 2. Resolution No. 2021-093 3. BAR Recommended
Text Final 326 Item a. PRESENTED: January 11, 2022 ORDINANCE NO. 2021- ADOPTED: ________________ AN ORDINANCE : AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE ARTICLE 7.5.6 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW OF
CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS TO AMEND THE ALLOWABLE PROJECTS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW IN THE OLD AND HISTORIC DISTRICT WHEREAS, the Town Council initiated zoning text amendment
TLOA02021-0005 on June 22, 2021 by adopting Resolution No. 2021-093 authorizing Zoning Ordinance amendments to expand administrative review of Certificates of Appropriateness.
WHEREAS, on October 4, 2021 the Board of Architectural Review recommended approval of the amended zoning ordinance language to increase the allowable applications for administrative
review: and WHEREAS, a duly advertised Planning Commission public hearing was held on November 4, 2021: WHEREAS, at their November 4, 2021 meeting, the Planning Commission
recommended approval of these amendments to the Zoning Ordinance to the Town Council: and WHEREAS, the Town Council held a duly advertised public hearing on these amendments
on January 11, 2021: and WHEREAS, the Town Council has concluded that the approval of these amemdments to the Zoning Ordinance would be in the public interest and in accordance
with sound zoning and planning principles; and 327 Item a. AN ORDINANCE: AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE ARTICLE 7.5.6 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW OF CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS TO AMEND
THE ALLOWABLE PROJECTS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW IN THE OLD AND HISTORIC DISTRICT -2- WHEREAS, the Town Council has concluded that the approal to the amendments to the
Zoning Ordinance is rationally related to serving legitimate government interests, including balancing the needs of the community and managing safety concerns WHEREAS, all prior ordinances
and resolutions in conflict herewith are repealed: and WHEREAS, code amendments are made by references to specific sections, articles or to a specific chapter. THEREFORE, ORDAINED,
by the Council of the Town of Leesburg in Virginia as follows: SECTION I. The zoning text amendments contained in TLOA-2021-0005 – amending Zoning Ordinance Article 7.5.6 to expand
administrative review of Certificates of Apropriateness, and SECTION II. That the following sections of the Zoning Ordinance for the Town of Leesurg, Virginia, 2003, as amended,
be and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: 7.5.6 Administrative Approval of Certificate of Appropriateness. The Preservation Planner (or designee) may have the authority
to grant the following approvals administratively if such applications are in conformance with the adopted Old and Historic District Guidelines. No adjacent property owner notification
or public hearing shall be required for applications which are approved administratively. If the Preservation Planner determines the application may not be in conformance with the
Old and Historic District Guidelines, the application shall be forwarded to the Board for consideration at the next meeting for which the advertising requirements can be met. Alternatively,
the applicant may withdraw any application which the Preservation Planner finds inconsistent with the Guidelines. A report of administrative approvals shall be provided on a monthly
basis at either a Board of Architectural Review Business Meeting or Work Session. A. Building and Site Enhancements. The Preservation Planner shall have the authority to issue a Certificate
of Appropriateness for alterations to existing or installation of: i. New lampposts or light fixtures ii. Fences 328 Item a. AN ORDINANCE: AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE ARTICLE 7.5.6
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW OF CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS TO AMEND THE ALLOWABLE PROJECTS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW IN THE OLD AND HISTORIC DISTRICT -3- iii. Driveways iv. Walkways
v. In-ground pools in the rear yard vi. Patios less than 250 square feet when they are located in the rear yard vii. Retaining, seating, or landscape walls of not more than 24 inches
in height provided that they are not attached to a primary structure viii. Trash enclosures ix. Pergolas (or similar unenclosed garden structures) in the rear yard x. Mechanical screening,
such as vents, measuring less than 1 cubic foot that match the surrounding material in color xi. Changes in existing exterior color schemes xii. Bollards and other traffic control
structures outside the right-of-way xiii. Small cell installations which are located on existing poles within the rightof-way and are design in accordance with the adopted franchise
agreement xiv. Accessory structures of less than 100 square feet located in the rear yard, less than 15’ to the peak of the roof in height, not on a permanent foundation and not to
exceed one such structure B. Signs. The Preservation Planner shall have authority to issue a Certificate of Appropriateness for applications that request approval for signs that conform
to the criteria as established in the Old and Historic District Sign Guidelines in the section titled “Administrative Approval Criteria for Signs in the Old and Historic District”.
C. Modifications to Existing Structures. The Preservation Planner shall have the authority to issue a Certificate of Appropriateness for the following modifications to existing structures.
1. Contributing Structures. The term “contributing” shall mean helping, assisting, or adding to the historical integrity, historic architectural qualities, or archaeological qualities
of the subject Historic District and/or the said Historic District's historic associations; a. Like-kind replacement of roof materials, siding, trim, railings, gutters, or downspouts,
porch flooring or stair risers/treads but not porch railings, columns or posts b. Installation or removal of storm windows and doors c. Removal, replacement or installation of shutters
d. Installation of HVAC units and associated support structures or other utilityrelated improvements 329 Item a. AN ORDINANCE: AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE ARTICLE 7.5.6 ADMINISTRATIVE
REVIEW OF CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS TO AMEND THE ALLOWABLE PROJECTS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW IN THE OLD AND HISTORIC DISTRICT -4- e. Removal of non-contributing material
and the necessary repair/maintenance following such removal f. Minor alterations or installations of architectural details including: i. Handrails but not guardrails or porch railings
or balustrades ii. Lattice iii. Decorative trim such as modillions, corbels or similar g. Removal or recovering of awnings. 2. Noncontributing Structures. The term “non-contributing”
shall mean not helping, not assisting, nor adding to the historical integrity, historic architectural qualities, or archaeological qualities of the subject Historic District and/or
the said Historic District's historic associations. a. Like Kind replacement of siding, trim, porch flooring or stair risers/treads, porch posts or railings b. Gutters (including changes
in gutter style or material when the new proposal is equally or more consistent with the Guidelines than the current) c. Roofing (including changes in roofing material when the new
material is equally consistent or more consistent with the Guidelines than the current sheathing) d. Exterior doors e. Installation or removal of storm windows and doors f. Removal,
replacement or installation of shutters g. Installation of HVAC units and associated support structures or other utilityrelated improvements h. Minor alterations or installations of
architectural details including: i. Handrails, guardrails, balustrades, or porch railings ii. Lattice iii. Decorative trim such as corbels, modillions, or similar i. Removal or recovering
of awnings j. Demolition of non-contributing accessory structures D. Change of Plans after Issuance of Permit. Any change in the approved plans subsequent to the issuance of a Certificate
of Appropriateness shall be promptly submitted to the Preservation Planner prior to construction of the modified feature. The Preservation Planner may administratively approve minor
alterations after the issuance of a COA provided that the following types of changes are in substantial conformance with the approved COA: 1. Change in the color(s) selected for a
project 2. Change in the profile of door and window moldings 3. Change in the type of siding used in a small area 330 Item a. AN ORDINANCE: AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE ARTICLE 7.5.6
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW OF CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS TO AMEND THE ALLOWABLE PROJECTS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW IN THE OLD AND HISTORIC DISTRICT -5- 4. Repositioning, or enlargement/reduct
ion in the size of a non-historic doorway or window opening, on an accessory structure or on the rear of a primary structure 5. Change in roof material as long as historic roof materials
are not removed 6. Repositioning, or changes in balustrade (guardrail), railings (including handrails), corbels or other decorative porch ornamentation, 7. Enlargement/reduction no
greater than 10% in the size of a porch or outdoor staircase on an accessory structure or on the rear of a primary structure 8. Other minor alterations determined by the Preservation
Planner which do not negatively affect the size, scale, massing, or character of the structure. SECTION III. This ordinance shall be in effect upon its passage. PASSED this
11 day of January, 2022. ______________________________ Kelly Burk, Mayor Town of Leesburg ATTEST: ______________________________ Clerk of Council 331 Item a. The
Town of Leesburg, Virginia PRESENTED: June 22.2021 RESOLUTION NO. 2021093 ADOPTED: June 22, 2021 A RESOLUTION: TO INITIATE AMENDMENTS TO ARTICLES 3 AND 7 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO
EXPAND ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW OF CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS WHEREAS, an expanded administrative review authority for Certificates of Appropriateness will allow property owners in
the architectural control districts greater efficiency in applying for Certificates of Appropriateness which have a minimal and positive effect on the character of the district in which
they are located; and WHEREAS, the Town Council discussed this item at a work session on June 21, 2021, and recommended initiation ofthis text amendment; and WHEREAS, the public necessity,
convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice require the proposed amendments. THEREFORE, RESOLVED, by the Council of the Town of Leesburg in Virginia as follows: 1. Amendments
to the Zoning Ordinance are hereby initiated, and referred to the Board of Architectural Review and Planning Commission to amend Articles 3 and 7 to review and expand the Certificates
of Appropriateness eligible for administrative approval by the Town' s Preservation Planner. 2. The Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing to consider amendments to the Zoning
Ordinance, and to report its recommendation to the Town Council pursuant the Section 15.22204 of the 1950 Code ofVirginia, as amended PASSED this 22' day of June, 2021. ATTEST: Clerk
of Council Kelly Burk, Or Town of Leesburg 332 Item a. Proposed changes to Leesburg Zoning Ordinance: Sec. 7.5 | H-1, Overlay, Old and Historic District Town of Leesburg, Virginia
Zoning Ordinance (July, 2020) 7.5.6 Administrative Approval of Certificate of Appropriateness. The Preservation Planner (or designee) may have the authority to grant the following
approvals administratively if such applications are in conformance with the adopted Old and Historic District Guidelines. No adjacent property owner notification or public hearing
shall be required for applications which are approved administratively. If the Preservation Planner determines the application may not be in conformance with the Old and Historic
District Guidelines, the application shall be forwarded to the Board for consideration at the next meeting for which the advertising requirements can be met. Alternatively, the applicant
may withdraw any application which the Preservation Planner finds inconsistent with the Guidelines. A report of administrative approvals shall be provided on a monthly basis at either
a Board of Architectural Review Business Meeting or Work Session. A. Building and Site Enhancements. The Preservation Planner shall have the authority to issue a Certificate of Appropriateness
for alterations to existing or installation of: i. New lampposts or light fixtures ii. Fences iii. Driveways iv. Walkways v. In-ground pools in the rear yard vi. Patios less than
250 square feet when they are located in the rear yard vii. Retaining, seating, or landscape walls of not more than 24 inches in height provided that they are not attached to a primary
structure viii. Trash enclosures ix. Pergolas (or similar unenclosed garden structures) in the rear yard x. Mechanical screening, such as vents, measuring less than 1 cubic foot that
match the surrounding material in color xi. Changes in existing exterior color schemes xii. Bollards and other traffic control structures outside the right-of-way xiii. Small cell
installations which are located on existing poles within the rightof-way and are design in accordance with the adopted franchise agreement xiv. Accessory structures of less than 100
square feet located in the rear yard, less than 15’ to the peak of the roof in height, not on a permanent foundation and not to exceed one such structure B. Signs. The Preservation
Planner shall have authority to issue a Certificate of Appropriateness for applications that request approval for signs that conform to the criteria as established in the Old and Historic
District Sign Guidelines in the 333 Item a. section titled “Administrative Approval Criteria for Signs in the Old and Historic District”. C. Modifications to Existing Structures. The
Preservation Planner shall have the authority to issue a Certificate of Appropriateness for the following modifications to existing structures. 1. Contributing Structures. The term
“contributing” shall mean helping, assisting, or adding to the historical integrity, historic architectural qualities, or archaeological qualities of the subject Historic District and/or
the said Historic District's historic associations; a. Like-kind replacement of roof materials, siding, trim, railings, gutters, or downspouts, porch flooring or stair risers/treads
but not porch railings, columns or posts b. Installation or removal of storm windows and doors c. Removal, replacement or installation of shutters d. Installation of HVAC units and
associated support structures or other utility-related improvements e. Removal of non-contributing material and the necessary repair/maintenance following such removal f. Minor alterations
or installations of architectural details including: i. Handrails but not guardrails or porch railings or balustrades ii. Lattice iii. Decorative trim such as modillions, corbels or
similar g. Removal or recovering of awnings. 2. Noncontributing Structures. The term “non-contributing” shall mean not helping, not assisting, nor adding to the historical integrity,
historic architectural qualities, or archaeological qualities of the subject Historic District and/or the said Historic District's historic associations. a. Like Kind replacement of
siding, trim, porch flooring or stair risers/treads, porch posts or railings b. Gutters (including changes in gutter style or material when the new proposal is equally or more consistent
with the Guidelines than the current) c. Roofing (including changes in roofing material when the new material is equally consistent or more consistent with the Guidelines than the current
sheathing) d. Exterior doors e. Installation or removal of storm windows and doors f. Removal, replacement or installation of shutters g. Installation of HVAC units and associated support
structures or other utility-related improvements h. Minor alterations or installations of architectural details including: i. Handrails, guardrails, balustrades, or porch railings
ii. Lattice iii. Decorative trim such as corbels, modillions, or similar 334 Item a. i. Removal or recovering of awnings j. Demolition of non-contributing accessory structures D.
Change of Plans after Issuance of Permit. Any change in the approved plans subsequent to the issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness shall be promptly submitted to the Preservation
Planner prior to construction of the modified feature. The Preservation Planner may administratively approve minor alterations after the issuance of a COA provided that the following
types of changes are in substantial conformance with the approved COA: 1. Change in the color(s) selected for a project 2. Change in the profile of door and window moldings 3. Change
in the type of siding used in a small area 4. Repositioning, or enlargement/reduction in the size of a non-historic doorway or window opening, on an accessory structure or on the
rear of a primary structure 5. Change in roof material as long as historic roof materials are not removed 6. Repositioning, or changes in balustrade (guardrail), railings (including
handrails), corbels or other decorative porch ornamentation, 7. Enlargement/reduction no greater than 10% in the size of a porch or outdoor staircase on an accessory structure or on
the rear of a primary structure 8. Other minor alterations determined by the Preservation Planner which do not negatively affect the size, scale, massing, or character of the structure.
335 Item a. Date of Council Meeting: January 11, 2022 TOWN OF LEESBURG TOWN COUNCIL MEETING Subject: TLOA-2021-0001 Batch Zoning Text Amendments Staff Contact: Michael Watkins, Zoning
Administrator Council Action Requested: Adoption of amendments to various sections of the Zoning Ordinance. Staff Recommendation: Approval of these batch zoning text amendments.
Commission Recommendation: The Planning Commission held two public hearings, the first occurred on September 2, 2021. A second meeting, held on November 18, 2021, was required due
to request to add “Portable Shed” to the list of amendments. The Commission’s discussion was primarily focused on: clarifications to the regulations pertaining to accessory structures;
minimizing regulations for accessory kitchens; and eliminating on-street parking credit and the opportunity for special exceptions associated with Family Day Homes. There were no public
comments at either public hearing. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the text amendments by a vote of 4-02 (two absent). Fiscal Impact: No fiscal impact analysis was
conducted as part of this amendment. Work Plan Impact: The approval of this amendment will not negatively affect the work plan for the Department of Planning and Zoning. Executive
Summary: This item is a continuation of the Council’s effort to update the Zoning Ordinance on a regular basis to: Implement Town Plan goals and objectives, Make corrections and
clarifications, and changes necessary to comply with annual state code legislative changes, Address problems discovered in the day-to-day administration of the Zoning Ordinance,
Respond to requests by citizens and business owners, and Address Town Council directives. Background: This Batch Amendment is focused on the following areas: 1. Portable Sheds:
Portable sheds are common accessory structures which are typically small enclosures located directly adjacent to primary structures, such as a residential dwelling (see Figure 1 below).
A portable shed is not currently defined and is subject to the location requirements for all accessory structure. This amendment adds a definition and permits these smaller accessory
enclosures to be adjacent to primary structures. 336 Item b. TLOA-2021-0001 Batch Zoning Text Amendments January 11, 2022 Page 2 2. Reduced Accessory Structure Setbacks: This issue
was identified through the permitting process whereby the existing setbacks sometimes prohibit an accessory structure from being built on a property. The purpose of the amendment is
to reduce the required separation of accessory structures from the principle dwelling to better accommodate common residential accessory structures. Staff is recommending that the minimum
separation be reduced from ten feet (10’) to five feet (5’). There are no Building Code or Fire Code conflicts, and this reduction will resolve a reoccurring constraint on many residential
properties. 3. Open Deck versus an Enclosed Deck, Porch, and Stoop: The purpose of this amendment is to clarify that the application of required setbacks to an open deck is different
from the application of those setbacks to a covered/enclosed deck. Additionally, adding definitions for Porch and Stoop will aid in understanding of permissible encroachments into required
yards. 4. The creation of illegal accessory dwelling units is commonly discovered through complaints of overcrowding, or illegal improvements after issuance and inspection of Zoning
Permits for Accessory Kitchens. To educate potential applicants, and to assist with enforcement efforts, staff recommends adding use standards for Accessory Kitchens. 5. Family
Day Home, General Organization of the Section, Clarification of the Application Requirements, and Inclusion of an Appeal Process: This issue was identified due to changes with the Code
of Virginia. The purpose of these amendments is to better organize this section of the Zoning Ordinance, clarify the permitting process associated with Family Day Homes, and to include
the required appeal process for administratively denied Home Occupation Permits for Family Day Homes. 6. Special Exception Validity Period: This issue was identified due to common
delays that occur during the land development process. The purpose of the amendment is to recognize these common delays an incorporate additional time to the validity period without
requiring additional administrative actions by applicants and staff. 7. ATM Signs – Definition and Standards: This issue was identified during the review of new sign permits. The purpose
of the permit is to codify a determination by the Zoning Administrator regarding an undefined sign type. Because ATM signs are common and an integral part of an ATM, this amendment
proposes to create a separate category specifically for banks and codify standards for ATM signs. 8. Floor Plans required with Zoning Permits: This issue was identified through the
permitting process when it was realized the requirement was in an obscure location that made it difficult to find for users. The purpose of the amendment is to relocate the zoning requirement
in a more frequently used section of the TLZO for clarity and ease of use. 337 Item b. TLOA-2021-0001 Batch Zoning Text Amendments January 11, 2022 Page 3 Proposed Legislation:
ORDINANCE Amending the Town of Leesburg Zoning Ordinance Articles 3, 9, 10, 15, and 18 as part of the Winter 2021 “Batch” Amendments Draft Motions: 1. I move to approve Zoning Ordinance
Amendment TLOA-2021-0001 based on the findings that the amendments further the objectives of the Town Plan and that the proposal would serve the public necessity, convenience, general
welfare, and good zoning practice. 2. I move to approve Zoning Ordinance Amendment TLOA-2021-0001 as amended, based on the findings that the amendments further the objectives of the
Town Plan and that the proposal would serve the public necessity, convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice. 3. I move to deny Zoning Ordinance Amendments TLOA-2021-0001
based on the following findings ___________________________________. 4. I move an alternate motion. Attachment: Draft Ordinance Rev. 05/27/2021 338 Item b. PRESENTED: January
11, 2022 ORDINANCE NO. 2022- ADOPTED: ______________ AN ORDINANCE : AMENDING THE TOWN OF LEESBURG ZONING ORDINANCE ARTICLES 3, 9, 10, 15, AND 18 AS PART OF THE WINTER 2021 “BATCH”
AMENDMENTS WHEREAS, the Department of Planning and Zoning has developed a regular process and schedule for maintaining the Town’s Zoning Ordinance for the purpose of making minor
changes resulting from implementing Town Plan goals and objectives, annual state mandated legislative changes, and the correction of errors, inconsistencies or problems discovered in
the day-to-day administration of the Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, on the Planning Commission initiated amendments to the Town of Leesburg Zoning Ordinance on February 4, 2021; and
WHEREAS, duly advertised Planning Commission public hearings were held on these amendments on September 2, 2021, and November 18, 2021; and WHEREAS, at their November 18, 2021, meeting,
the Planning Commission recommended approval of these amendments to the Zoning Ordinance to the Town Council; and WHEREAS, the Town Council held a duly advertised public hearing on
these amendments on January 11, 2022; and WHEREAS, the Council has concluded that the approval of these amendments to the Zoning Ordinance would be in the public interest and in accordance
with sound zoning and planning principles. THEREFORE, ORDAINED, by the Council of the Town of Leesburg in Virginia as follows: 339 Item b. AN ORDINANCE: AMENDING THE TOWN OF LEESBURG
ZONING ORDINANCE ARTICLES 3, 9, 10, 15, AND 18 AS PART OF THE WINTER 2021 “BATCH” AMENDMENTS -2- SECTION I. That Section 18.1 of the Zoning Ordinance of the Town of Leesburg,
Virginia, 2003, as amended, be and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 18.1 Terms Defined 18.1.88.1 Kitchen, Accessory Associated with single family dwellings, for
use by the family residing within the dwelling unit, accessory or in addition to the first kitchen within the dwelling unit. A second area within a single-family detached dwelling equipped
with appliances and plumbing for the purpose of preparing and cooking food, subject to the use standards in Sec. 9.4.1.1. Approval of an accessory or additional kitchen in a single-family
dwelling shall not be considered approval of a second dwelling unit or accessory dwelling unit unless approved per Section 9.4.1 of the Zoning Ordinance. 18.1.145.2 Enclosed or Roofed
Deck: A deck which has a roof that is attached to the side or rear of a principal dwelling. An enclosed deck is considered an addition to the dwelling which may be completely enclosed,
or partially open. 18.1.145.1 Porch: A roofed and open-sided architectural feature located on the front or side of a dwelling designed to shelter a principal entrance. Similar features
include vestibule or portico. 18.1.170.1 Shed An accessory structure as defined in Sec. 18.1.181, subject to use standards in Sec. 10.4.5.C.1 18.1.170.2 Shed, Portable An accessory
structure as defined in Sec. 18.1.181, where the width is greater than the depth, is readily movable without machinery, and is subject to use standards in Sec. 10.4.5.C.2 18.1.178.1
Stoop: An uncovered landing, typically elevated by a step or steps, attached to the principal dwelling, and associated with an entry to the structure. SECTION II. That Section
10.4.5.C of the Zoning Ordinance of the Town of Leesburg, Virginia, 2003, as amended, be and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 10.4 Measurements, Computations, and
Exceptions 10.4.5.C Extensions into Required Yards. The following uses and structures shall be permitted to be located within required yards, subject to the limitations established
herein. No structure may be erected over a public right-of-way or easement, except as permitted in the Town Code. 1. Accessory Structures. Accessory structure or structures which are
customarily incidental and subordinate to the principal structure or use on the property, m May be erected within a required side or rear yard, provided such accessory structures:
a. are separated from the principal structure by a minimum of ten feet (10’); in the case of residential sheds, separation from the principal structure shall be a minimum of five feet
(5’); and 340 Item b. AN ORDINANCE: AMENDING THE TOWN OF LEESBURG ZONING ORDINANCE ARTICLES 3, 9, 10, 15, AND 18 AS PART OF THE WINTER 2021 “BATCH” AMENDMENTS -3- b. are located
a minimum of two feet (2’) from a side or rear property line; and c. are located no closer than five feet (5’) to any structure on an adjacent lot; and d. within residential zoning
districts shall not exceed twenty feet (20’) in height; and e. within residential zoning districts shall not exceed 900 gross square feet in area, or no more than fifty percent (50%)
of the principal structure’s footprint, whichever is less; and f. within multi-family and non-residential uses shall not exceed fifty percent (50%) of the principal structure’s footprint
and shall adhere to the district regulations for side and rear yard requirements. 5. Uncovered Decks, and Patios a. Uncovered decks which are attached to the principal dwelling and
are not more than three (3) feet above grade on the lot may extend into a required side or rear yard within five (5) feet of the property line for single-family detached residences
and three (3) feet of the side or rear property line for all other residential uses. Enclosed-Roofed Decks are not permitted within required yards. b. Uncovered decks, which are attached
to the principal dwelling and are more than three (3) feet above grade on the lot, may extend into a required rear yard to within ten (10) feet of the property line; however, side yard
requirements shall apply. Enclosed-Roofed Decks are not permitted within required yards. 15. Accessory Structures, Portable. (Examples provided in Figures 10.4.5.C.1.a and b) within
residential districts, may be erected within a required side or rear yard, provided such structures: a. are rectangular in shape, where the structure is greater in its width than its
depth; and b. are less than fifty (50) square feet in area; and c. are located a minimum of five feet (5’) from a side or rear property line; and d. shall not exceed twelve feet (12’)
in height; and e. shall not be attached to the principal dwelling 341 Item b. AN ORDINANCE: AMENDING THE TOWN OF LEESBURG ZONING ORDINANCE ARTICLES 3, 9, 10, 15, AND 18 AS PART OF
THE WINTER 2021 “BATCH” AMENDMENTS -4- Figure 10.4.5.C.15.a Figure 10.4.5.C.15.b SECTION III. That Section 9.4 of the Zoning Ordinance of the Town of Leesburg, Virginia, 2003,
as amended, be and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 9.4 Accessory Uses 9.4.1.1 Accessory Kitchen A. Definition. See Sec. 18.1.88.1. B. Use Standards. 1. Location:
i. An accessory kitchen may not be separated from the rest of the building by doors, walls, or windows. ii. May not be located in a detached accessory structure. 2. Size: An accessory
kitchen must be smaller than the primary kitchen. 3. Number: A single-family detached dwelling may not include more than one accessory kitchen. 4. Permits: i. An accessory kitchen
is subject to the review and approval of a single Town of Leesburg Zoning Permit. ii. The owner shall be responsible for obtaining all necessary trade permits from Loudoun County.
C. Disclosure Statement. The property owner shall be required to provide an affidavit, as provided for on the required permit application form, that acknowledges and prohibits the creation
of a separate dwelling unit. D. Exclusion. An accessory kitchen is not created when the primary means of food preparation is based on a microwave, plug-in toaster, or other similar
counter-top appliance connected to an electrical outlet less than 220 volts. 342 Item b. AN ORDINANCE: AMENDING THE TOWN OF LEESBURG ZONING ORDINANCE ARTICLES 3, 9, 10, 15, AND 18
AS PART OF THE WINTER 2021 “BATCH” AMENDMENTS -5- SECTION IV. That Section 9.4 of the Zoning Ordinance of the Town of Leesburg, Virginia, 2003, as amended, be and the same is
hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 9.4 Accessory Uses 9.4.7 Family Day Home A. Definition. See Section 18.1.61.1 B. When Permits Required. 1. Application: A Home Occupation
Permit is required for a Family Day Home of five (5) to twelve (12) children. 2. Required Notice: As required by Code of Virginia Section §15.2-2292, upon receipt of an application
for a Family Day Home for five (5) to twelve (12) children, the Zoning Administrator shall send notice by registered or certified letter to the last known address of each adjacent property
owner. C. Exemption. A Family Day Home for one (1) to four (4) children shall be permitted byright, and shall be exempt from a Home Occupation Permit and the use standards contained
herein. D. Approval: If the Zoning Administrator receives no written objection from a person so notified within thirty days of the date of sending the letter, and determines that the
Family Day Home otherwise complies with the provisions of the ordinance, the Zoning Administrator shall issue the permit sought. E. Referral to Town Council: The Zoning Administrator
may refer the application to the Town Council for consideration, when sufficient evidence has been provided in the form of a written objection from an adjacent property owner that the
Family Day Home does not otherwise comply with the provisions of this ordinance. F. Denial: The Zoning Administrator may deny a Home Occupation Permit for a Family Day Home if: 1.
The use standards contained herein have not been met; or 2. Sufficient evidence has been provided in the form of a written objection from an adjacent property owner that the Family
Day Home does not otherwise comply with the provisions of this ordinance. The Zoning Administrator shall set forth the reasons for denial in writing and transmit to the applicant via
First Class Mail. G. Appeal: An applicant may file a petition with the Clerk of Council, setting forth the basis of the appeal within thirty (30) days after the date of the administrative
denial letter. Upon receipt of the appeal, the Clerk of the Council shall promptly schedule a public hearing, subject to the advertising requirements in Sec. 3.1.9 Public Hearing Notices.
In any appeal, the Town Council shall consider the written appeal and the criteria set forth in Sec. 9.4.7.I Performance Standards. Upon such hearing, the Town Council may approve such
permit, subject to such conditions agreed upon by the applicant and the locality, or affirm the denial of the permit. 343 Item b. AN ORDINANCE: AMENDING THE TOWN OF LEESBURG ZONING
ORDINANCE ARTICLES 3, 9, 10, 15, AND 18 AS PART OF THE WINTER 2021 “BATCH” AMENDMENTS -6- H. Performance Standards. 1. The Family Day Home shall comply with any and all requirements
of the Town and State Codes, including without limitation, procurement and maintenance of a Home Occupation Permit, a Town Business License, and a State Family Day Home License in accordance
with the State Code, as applicable. 2. The Family Day Home shall comply with any and all requirements of the County and State Building Codes. 3. If the proposed location of the Family
Day Home is subject to a Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions for a Homeowners Association (HOA), then prior to the issuance of the Home Occupation Permit, the Family
Day Home provider shall provide the Town with documentation whether or not the use is allowable under applicable HOA Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions. 4. Lot Size: i. By-right:
Up to four children may be permitted by-right on any size lot. ii. Special Exception: A special exception is required for a Family Day Home greater than four children on a lot less
than 2,000 square feet. 5. There shall be no more than two employees for a Family Day Home. The applicant shall demonstrate availability of employee parking onsite. or along the street.
6. Child drop-off and pick-up locations shall be designated to enhance the safety of children as they arrive and depart. A designated arrival and departure zone shall be located adjacent
to the Family Day Home in such a manner that children do not have to cross the street to enter or exit the home. 7. Family Day Homes shall stagger pick-up and drop-off times such that
there are never more than two vehicles picking-up or dropping-off at one time. 8. There shall be no change in the outside appearance of the Family Day Home or lot nor other visible
evidence of the conduct of a Family Day Home other than what may be required by the State Family Day Home License or provisions elsewhere in this Zoning Ordinance. 9. Seventy-five (75)
square feet of outdoor play area must be provided on-site per child except as follows: i. No outdoor play area shall be required on-site when the applicant can demonstrate the Family
Day Home is located within 1,000 feet of an existing park or play lot that is at least twice the area otherwise required for the home care service. ii. The park or play lot must be
public or owned by the homeowners’ association to which the residence belongs and must be accessed without crossing an arterial or collector road. iii. The outdoor play area must
be shown on a plat to scale submitted at the time of application for the permit. 10. Fencing: Outdoor play area must be enclosed by a fence with a minimum height of four (4) feet.
11. Play Equipment Location: No play equipment shall be located within the required yard setbacks. 12. Pathway to Facility: There must be a continuous hard-surface pathway/sidewalk
connecting the drop-off and pick-up location to the entrance of the Family Day Home. The pathway shall be kept free of any snow or ice. 344 Item b. AN ORDINANCE: AMENDING THE TOWN
OF LEESBURG ZONING ORDINANCE ARTICLES 3, 9, 10, 15, AND 18 AS PART OF THE WINTER 2021 “BATCH” AMENDMENTS -7- SECTION V. That Section 3.4 of the Zoning Ordinance of the Town of
Leesburg, Virginia, 2003, as amended, be and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 3.4 Special Exceptions 3.4.16 Termination of Use A special exception or minor special
exception use shall be deemed terminated upon the occurrence of any of the following conditions: A. Lapse of Approval. Unless a longer period of validity is specifically approved as
part of such application, a Special special exception or minor special exception approval shall lapse and be of no further effect two five (5) years after from the date of on which
the approval by the Town Council was granted, unless a site plan zoning permit has been officially accepted for review issued for the use within such five (5) year period. Notwithstanding
the foregoing, special exception or minor special exception approval shall lapse and be of no further effect three years after the date of the approval by the Town Council unless a
zoning permit or occupancy permit has been issued for the use. B. Abandonment or Cessation. If a special exception or minor special exception use is discontinued, vacant or inactive
for any reason for a continuous period of two (2) years or more, the special exception or minor special exception approval shall lapse and be of no further effect and the use shall
be re-established only if a new special exception or minor special exception approval is obtained. Code of Virginia, §15-2.2307.C, as amended SECTION VI. That Article 15 of
the Zoning Ordinance of the Town of Leesburg, Virginia, 2003, as amended, be and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 15.3 Definitions 15.3 Automated Teller Machine
(ATM) Sign A sign mounted directly onto a ground-mounted ATM, or its enclosure, or a wall-mounted ATM, and whose principal purpose is to identify the name of the bank. Sec. 15.8
Sign Regulations by Use and District 15.8.10 Signs for Banks Signage for banks shall be limited to the following: A. Maximum Number of Sign Types: 1. Two (2) for banks without an
ATM. 2. Three (3) for banks with an ATM, one of which shall be an ATM sign. B. Types of Signs Permitted: A-frame/Sandwich Board, ATM, Awning/Canopy, Drivethru Lane, Ground, Monument,
Projecting, Wall, and Window signs. C. Exemption: Drive-thru Lane Signs are Minor Signs, less than two (2) square feet, with no corporate identification, and are exempt from a Sign
Permit. 345 Item b. AN ORDINANCE: AMENDING THE TOWN OF LEESBURG ZONING ORDINANCE ARTICLES 3, 9, 10, 15, AND 18 AS PART OF THE WINTER 2021 “BATCH” AMENDMENTS -8- D. Maximum Size
of Signs: 1. A-frame/Sandwich Board Sign. Twenty-four (24) inches in width and thirty-four (34) inches in height. 2. ATM. Each ATM may include more than one sign but shall be limited
to a cumulative area of six (6) square feet. 3. Awning or Canopy Sign. One (1) square foot per linear foot of the awning or canopy, up to twenty (20) square feet. 4. Ground Sign. One
(1) square foot per five (5) linear feet of street frontage, up to a maximum size of forty (40) square feet. There shall be no more than 30 inches clearance from the bottom of the sign
to the ground below. 5. Monument Sign. One (1) square foot per five linear feet of lot frontage on which the sign is to be located, up to a maximum size of forty (40) square feet and
a maximum height of ten (10) feet. 6. Projecting Sign. One (1) square foot per linear foot of building frontage on which the sign is to be attached, up to twelve (12) square feet. 7.
Wall or Marquee Sign. One (1) square foot per linear foot of building frontage on which the sign or signs are to be attached, up to a maximum aggregate of one hundred (100) square feet.
8. Window Sign. Permanent window signs shall be limited to twenty-five percent (25%) of the total square footage of window area, inclusive of all windows on the façade facing the public
street or the front of the building where no street frontage exists, or sixteen (16) square feet, whichever is less. Window signs located above the ground floor shall not be illuminated.
SECTION VII. That Sections 3.7 amd 11.12 of the Zoning Ordinance of the Town of Leesburg, Virginia, 2003, as amended, be and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec.
3.7 Zoning Permits 3.7.3 Application Submittal Every application for a zoning permit shall be accompanied by plans in duplicate, drawn to scale in black line or blueprint, showing
actual shape and dimensions of the lot to be built upon or to be changed in its use, in whole or in part; the exact location, size, elevation and height of any building or structure
to be erected or altered; the existing and intended use of each building or structure or part thereof; the number of families or housekeeping units the building is designed to accommodate
and, when no buildings are involved, the location of the present use and proposed use to be made of the lot. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to provide any additional
information necessary for the Zoning Administrator to determine the proposed use, building, structure or alteration complies with all provisions of this Zoning Ordinance. A. It shall
be the responsibility of the applicant to provide any additional information necessary for the Zoning Administrator to determine the proposed use, building, structure, or alteration
complies with all provisions of this Zoning Ordinance. Each application for a zoning permit shall be accompanied by a scaled drawing(s) which: 1. Depicts the shape and dimensions of
the lot to be built upon or to be changed in its use, in whole or in part; and 2. The location of any building or structure to be erected or altered; and 3. The existing and intended
use of each building or structure or part thereof; and 346 Item b. AN ORDINANCE: AMENDING THE TOWN OF LEESBURG ZONING ORDINANCE ARTICLES 3, 9, 10, 15, AND 18 AS PART OF THE WINTER
2021 “BATCH” AMENDMENTS -9- 4. Floorplans to verify compliance with applicable requirements of this Ordinance; and 5. The number of families or housekeeping units the building
is designed to accommodate; and 6. When no buildings are involved, the location of the present use and proposed use to be made of the lot. B. The Zoning Administrator shall have the
discretion to reduce or modify the application requirements of this section to ensure that sufficient information has been provided for the review of the application. Sec. 11.12 Administration
11.12.1 Floor Plans The Zoning Administrator may require the submittal of floor plans for any use prior to issuance of a zoning permit proposed with a land development application
to verify compliance with these regulations the calculation of required parking. SECTION VIII. Severability. If a court of competent jurisdiction declares any provision of this
ordinance invalid, the decision shall not affect the validity of the ordinance as a whole or any remaining provisions of this ordinance. SECTION IX. This ordinance shall be in effect
upon its passage. PASSED this 11th day of January, 2022. ______________________________ Kelly Burk, Mayor Town of Leesburg ATTEST: ______________________________
Clerk of Council 347 Item b. Date of Council Meeting: January 11, 2022 TOWN OF LEESBURG TOWN COUNCIL MEETING Subject: Off-duty Employment of Police Officers Staff Contact: Gregory
C. Brown, Chief of Police Captain Jaime Sanford Jessica Arena, Assistant Town Attorney Council Action Requested: Adopt an ordinance permitting Town law enforcement officers to engage
in off-duty employment under a general order promulgated by the Chief of Police. Staff Recommendation: Adoption of the proposed ordinance. Commission Recommendation: Not applicable.
Fiscal Impact: None. Work Plan Impact: None. Executive Summary: This ordinance will assure conformance with the State Code regarding the Town’s authorization of off-duty services
by the Leesburg Police Department for the Town residents and businesses. Background: The Leesburg Police Department (LPD) has served the Town since 1758, and currently is a full-service
law enforcement agency that remains open 24 hours a day. Part of LPD’s services to the public is to make available off-duty officers for hire by secondary employers who want to enhance
public safety at various events within the Town. The majority of requests for offduty officers encompass traffic control at local sporting events or Sunday church services, visual
presence for public and private events, and Town special events. Off-duty employment increases police visibility in the community, supplements agency staffing by handling situations
that would otherwise require an on-duty officer, and offers officers a way to earn supplemental income that exceeds their normal pay. Bench marking with other jurisdictions within Northern
Virginia, best practice is to adopt an ordinance (like Fairfax County, Fairfax City, Loudoun County, Prince William County, the City of Alexandria, the Town of Vienna, and the Town
of Herndon) expressly setting the authority for and terms and conditions of such off-duty employment. Current rules and regulations of off-duty employment is governed by LPD General
Order No. 403. See Attachment #2. All off-duty work must be approved by the Chief of Police or his designee, and must not conflict with an officer’s duties as a LPD employee. 348
Item c. Off-duty Employment of Police Officers January 11, 2022 Page 2 Proposed Legislation: ORDINANCE Permitting Town Law Enforcement Officers to Engage in Off-Duty Employment
which may Occasionally Require the Use of their Police Powers in the Performance of Such Employment Draft Motions: 1. I move to approve the proposed Ordinance permitting Town law enforcement
officers to engage in off-duty employment. 2. I move to deny the proposed Ordinance permitting Town law enforcement officers to engage in off-duty employment. OR 3. I move an alternate
motion. Attachments: 1. Proposed Ordinance 2. LPD General Order No. 403 Rev. 05/27/2021 349 Item c. PRESENTED: January 11, 2022 ORDINANCE NO. 2022- ADOPTED: ______________
AN ORDINANCE : PERMITTING TOWN LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS TO ENGAGE IN OFF-DUTY EMPLOYMENT WHICH MAY OCCASIONALLY REQUIRE THE USE OF THEIR POLICE POWERS IN THE PERFORMANCE OF SUCH EMPLOYMENT
WHEREAS, Virginia Code § 15.2-1712 allows localities to adopt an ordinance which permits law-enforcement officers in such locality to engage in off-duty employment which may occasionally
require the use of their police powers in the performance of such employment; and WHEREAS, adoption of this ordinance is in the best interest of the Town; and WHEREAS, the Chief of
Police recommends the adoption of this ordinance. THEREFORE, ORDAINED, by the Council of the Town of Leesburg in Virginia as follows: SECTION I. That the Town Code of Leesburg,
Virginia is hereby amended by adding a section to be numbered 24-3, which said section reads as follows: Sec. 24-3. – Employment of off-duty law enforcement officers. Town law enforcement
officers are authorized to engage in off-duty employment by private employers which may occasionally require the use of their police powers in the performance of such employment; provided
that such off-duty employment shall conform with and not violate the reasonable rules and regulations promulgated by the chief of police. State Law reference— Authority for above section,
Code of Virginia, § 15.2-1712. SECTION II. The Chief of Police shall promulgate, and may amend from time tot ime, reasonable rules to apply to such off-duty employment and shall
cause those rules to be included in the departmental general orders. SECTION III. This ordinance shall be in effect upon its passage. 350 Item c. AN ORDINANCE: PERMITTING
TOWN LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS TO ENGAGE IN OFF-DUTY EMPLOYMENT WHICH MAY OCCASIONALLY REQUIRE THE USE OF THEIR POLICE POWERS IN THE PERFORMANCE OF SUCH EMPLOYMENT -2- PASSED
this 11th day of January, 2022. ______________________________ Kelly Burk, Mayor Town of Leesburg ATTEST: ______________________________ Clerk of Council 351 Item c.
1 (General Order 403, Effective February 2020) LEESBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT REGULATIONS AND GENERAL ORDERS MANUAL General Order Number:
Section: Issue Date: 403 PERSONNEL
JULY 1997 Title: COMPENSATION, BENEFITS AND CONDITIONS OF WORK Accreditation Standards: PER.03.01, PER.03.02, PER.03.03, PER.03.04,
PER.03.05, PER.03.06, PER.04.01, PER.04.02, PER.10.01 Effective Date: Review Date: Total Pages: Chief of Police: FEBRUARY 2020 FEBRUARY
2020 5 I. COMPENSATION – See Town of Leesburg Personnel and Procedures Manual (PPM) Employee Compensation Sections 5.1 through 5.6 A. The Salary Schedule (PPM Appendix
B) shall be in accordance with the Code of Virginia, § 15.2-1506; and consist of the two parts as follows: l. A schedule of pay grades showing a minimum and maximum rate for each grade
and such intermediate steps as deemed necessary; 2. A list of all class titles showing the allocation of each class to the appropriate pay grade. 3. Overtime. See Town of Leesburg PPM
Section 5.7 Overtime must be authorized by an employee’s supervisor prior to commencing overtime, unless exigent circumstances exist which require an employee to work overtime and then
seek approval. Exigent circumstances may include, but are not limited to, late arrests, emergency conditions, public disorder, etc. Supervisors are responsible for only approving that
overtime which is necessary to accomplish the Department’s mission. Failure to have overtime preauthorized may result in the request for overtime being denied. There will be occasions
when an employee is off duty and is called to return to work after departing from the workplace. An employee who comes into work during off-duty hours may receive a minimum of two hours
overtime for each separate incident. An employee callback must be at the direction of a supervisor. In order for an employee to be eligible for callback, the employee must actually
report to the police facility for assignment. Officers attending court when off duty will be credited with a minimum of two hours overtime if budget restraints permit. Officers should
make every effort to determine if a scheduled court appearance is required. It is appropriate and reasonable to contact the court to determine if defendants have posted collateral or
requested continuances. Officers attending meetings when off duty will be credited with a minimum of two hours overtime. No overtime is authorized for placing or receiving telephone
calls while off duty. a. Field Training Officers or Communications Training Officers who are assigned to train an employee may receive one hour of overtime pay. b. Canine Officers may
receive eight regular hours every pay period for canine care. 4. Travel Time Allocation A maximum of 15 minutes combined (to and from work assignment and return) travel time is authorized.
Travel time allocation begins once the employee arrives at his/her principal place of duty. 5. Extra Duty Employment Extra duty employment is department-approved employment for entities
outside the Leesburg Police Department wherein the actual or potential use of law enforcement powers is anticipated. Assignments are outside of normal work schedules (i.e. Town Special
Events, Contracted Police Services) and are compensated at the standard overtime rate. Leesburg Police Department duties and assignments take precedence over any extra- duty employment.
Officers engaging in extra duty assignments shall receive a description of their duties and responsibilities and adhere to all Leesburg Police Department Rules and Regulations under
the 352 Item c. 2 (General Order 403, Effective February 2020) supervision of the event supervisor or on- duty shift supervisor and are considered in an on-duty status. B. Definitions
1. Extra Duty work hours - the actual number of extra duty hours worked 2. Call Back Compensation – the minimum amount of hours that the department and source of outside employment
has agreed to pay 3. Actual officer compensation – the amount of hours the officer will receive for the assignment. It will be the greater of either the Call Back Compensation number
or the travel time allocation added to the actual number of additional hours worked. For example: a. If an officer works a school sporting event that lasts 2 hours plus the authorized
travel time, the total would be 2.25 hours. However, since the Town’s agreement with the schools allows for a 3-hour minimum, the officer will be paid for 3 hours. b. If an officer
works an event that lasts 2 hours plus the authorized travel time, the total authorized compensation would be 2.25 hours, since there is no agreement for a minimum number of hours’
compensation. 4. However if an officer who is on an authorized extra duty assignment becomes involved in legitimate documented police service delivery (i.e. call response, back up,
disabled vehicle, etc.), he/she will be compensated for the additional time expended on the police event if it exceeds the amount authorized for the call back extra duty assignment.
Officers in this status must document the action via police CAD and notify the on- duty supervisor via police radio. a. As per Town Personnel Regulations, this compensation is based
upon 15 minute increments. 5. Extra-duty employment approval may be terminated at any time at the discretion of the Chief of Police or designee if the employment impairs with on-duty
efficiency or conflicts with the duties and responsibilities of departmental personnel. 6. Officers shall not engage in extra-duty employment unless the assignment is authorized
by the Chief of Police. C. Compensatory Time. See Town of Leesburg PPM Section 5.7 D. Temporary Pay Increase The Chief of Police may authorize a temporary pay increase to officers
assigned by the Division Commanders as Officer-in-Charge (OIC) in the absence of a Supervisor when the Supervisor’s absence exceeds 30 days. This increase is not considered a promotion
and is only in effect for the period specified by the Division Commander. II. BENEFITS A. Refer to the Town of Leesburg Personnel Procedures Manual for all Benefits information
B. Personnel Support Services. 1. Office of the Human Resources Director The Human Resources Director will assist any employee with information on employee benefits and help for
the employee in cases of illness, injury or death. The Office will also serve as liaison between the employee and the health care system and retirement system. 2. Employee Assistance
Program (EAP). See Town of Leesburg PPM, Section 7.10 C. Liability Protection. The Town of Leesburg carries insurance intended to provide protection for personnel and the Town in
cases of legal action against an employee and/or the Town. The insurance will cover authorized appropriate actions undertaken within the scope of the employee’s official duties. Legal
action instituted against an employee or the Town as a result of willful neglect of duty or purposefully harmful actions may be the sole liability of the employee involved. The Finance
Department has responsibility as negotiator for the liability protection program. 353 Item c. 3 (General Order 403, Effective February 2020) D. Education Benefits. See Town of Leesburg
PPM, Section 9.11: Tuition Assistance Program III. CONDITIONS OF WORK A. Physical Examinations. 1. Sworn employees may be required to undergo a periodic physical examination.
The exam will be provided at no cost to the employee by a health provider designated by the Town. The frequency of exams is based on the employee’s age and will be incorporated into
the Leesburg Police Department Physical Fitness Program. 2. The physical examination is conducted only to determine the employee’s continued fitness to perform the tasks of a police
officer and to inform them of their general physical condition. Officers must be found fit to perform the essential functions of their position. Officers found to be unfit will be evaluated
on a case by case basis. This evaluation will include a determination of whether or not a reasonable accommodation can be made. 3. The cost of required or pre-employment physical examinations
will be at the Town’s expense. No fees will be charged to employees or prospective employees. B. General Health and Fitness. All personnel are required to maintain a level of fitness
which will permit them to effectively carry out their duties. To assist personnel in achieving their fitness goals, the Town provides free access to their recreational facilities, the
Academy provides in- service training in fitness and well-being, and the department allows sworn personnel to conduct on-duty wellness routines per General Order 412 Wellness Program.
See Regulation A-19. Supervisors shall monitor their employee’s work and attendance records, and other signs that may indicate certain employees have a health problem. If there appears
to be a problem, the respective division commander shall be notified. At the commander’s discretion, the Chief of Police may be notified and may require the employee to submit to an
examination. C. Off-Duty Employment 1. Off-duty employment is outside employment wherein the use of law enforcement powers is not anticipated. The regulations pertaining to such secondary
employment apply to both sworn and nonsworn personnel. To ensure on-duty efficiency and to eliminate possible conflicts of interest, the Chief of Police shall exercise such control
as deemed necessary to realize these organizational goals. It is the policy of the Leesburg Police that any off-duty employment will not be permitted when it may impair on-duty efficiency
or conflict with the duties and responsibilities of departmental personnel. 2. Regulations a. Employment shall not constitute a conflict of interest as governed by the Town of Leesburg
Personnel Manual. b. Personnel shall not work off-duty in any capacity during their training period. c. While on duty, personnel shall not solicit any individual or business for
the purpose of off-duty employment. d. Off-duty employment shall not exceed l4 hours per day, including on-duty time. e. Town owned vehicles and radios shall not be used while
traveling to and from or engaging in off-duty employment. f. Off-duty employment approval may be terminated at any time at the discretion of the Chief of Police or designee if the
employment impairs with on-duty efficiency or conflicts with the duties and responsibilities of departmental personnel. 3. Administration Before accepting off-duty employment or entering
into a business affiliation, personnel must obtain written permission from the Chief of Police. Each request will be handled on an individual basis. Personnel shall be aware that injuries
incurred during off-duty employment activities will not be covered under Worker’s Compensation or duty related retirement. Absence from duty due to injury 354 Item c. 4 (General Order
403, Effective February 2020) or illness incurred during off-duty employment will necessitate the employee’s use of sick, annual or compensatory leave. D. Bloodborne Pathogen Control.
All officers and Communications Section personnel are provided with training regarding bloodborne pathogen control. (See also the Leesburg Police Exposure Control Plan for Bloodborne
Pathogens and General Order 409). E. Reporting Personal Injuries – See Town of Leesburg PPM, Sections 7.14 and 8.6 Personnel of the Department shall follow the procedures set forth
in this order to ensure prompt and accurate reporting of any injury which may be covered under the Virginia Worker’s Compensation Act (VWCA). Personnel are covered by the VWCA for any
injury sustained while properly performing assigned duties, including training programs, for as long as medically necessary. Such injuries will not be charged against sick leave. VWCA
coverage begins when the injured person cannot work. 1. On-Duty Injuries. a. Personnel who sustain an injury performing duties as previously described shall orally report the circumstances
to their immediate supervisor. If their immediate supervisor is not available, the next level supervisor shall be notified. This report of injury must be made immediately after the
occurrence, or as soon as the injured employee is physically able. The report must clearly explain when, how, and why the injury occurred, and describe in detail the extent of the injury.
The immediate supervisor, who receives such a report, shall notify the appropriate division commander as soon as possible. The investigating official shall complete and submit the electronic
VML Workers Compensation Claims form. A copy of this completed form shall be printed at the time of submission. The contact information section of this form shall be completed with
the Human Resources Director’s contact information. b. The injured employee will complete and sign a Town of Leesburg Workers Compensation Panel of Physicians form. A copy will be provided
to the injured employee. c. The employee’s immediate supervisor shall investigate the circumstances surrounding the injury and report their findings in a memorandum to the Chief
of Police. The memorandum should contain all of the pertinent information needed by the appropriate reviewing authority to determine the proximate cause of the injury and whether or
not the injury is compensable. Except in the most unusual of circumstances, the memorandum shall be completed by the end of the supervisor’s tour of duty. d. The injured employee
will be provided an opportunity to review the supervisor’s memorandum. If the employee concurs with the report, he or she shall sign the memorandum. e. In situations of non-concurrence
between the supervisor and the injured employee, the employee shall submit a detailed memorandum of facts to the Chief of Police, through the chain of command, within twenty-four hours.
In the event the injury prevents the submission of the memorandum within this time frame, it shall be submitted as soon as the employee is able, or as soon as a statement can be taken
from the employee. f. The supervisor conducting the inquiry shall, before reporting off-duty, forward the copy of the VML Risk Management Programs Workers Compensation Claims form
and the original completed and signed Town of Leesburg Compensation Panel of Physicians form along with the memorandum of facts to their immediate supervisor. These documents shall
be forwarded through the chain of command to the Office of the Chief of Police. g. Any additional medical statements or information received by the injured employee will be forwarded
to their immediate supervisor as soon as possible. This information shall be forwarded to the respective division commander. h. It is the responsibility of the injured employee or
their supervisor, if the employee is unable to speak, to notify the hospital, doctor, and/or pharmacy that all expenses in the treatment of the injury should be billed to the Town of
Leesburg. All bills shall be forwarded to the Human Resources Director. 355 Item c. 5 (General Order 403, Effective February 2020) i. Personnel that return to full-duty status
after recovering from an injury who later believe that follow-up treatment of the earlier injury is required, must first contact the Human Resource Manager for payment authorization.
Unless prior approval of follow-up consultation is received, the injured employee may be liable for the medical expenses. j. Personnel who are injured while performing the duties
of their position without fault or negligence on their part, when such injury prevents a return to duty, will immediately be placed on injury leave. When possible, personnel who have
been injured while in an on-duty status, but are not totally disabled, will be placed in temporary assignments to perform duties that comply with any medical restrictions imposed by
their injury. An injured employee who has been off as a result of their injury or who has been assigned to a light duty position must provide a written doctor’s authorization before
returning to full duty. This written authorization shall be submitted to the employee’s supervisor and shall be forwarded through the chain of command to the Office of the Chief of
Police. k. Personnel on injury leave are specifically prohibited from engaging in activities that may impair their recovery. These include: (1) Engaging in recreational or other
physical activities without the approval of the authorized physician; (2) Being employed or self-employed to perform work of any kind without the prior written approval of the authorized
physician and the Chief of Police. l. If the designated medical examination unit determines that an officer has a high blood pressure condition or if high blood pressure is detected
during a private examination, a monitoring period will be necessary to determine if a high blood pressure condition does exist. If an officer is diagnosed as having high blood pressure
or other associated complications, the diagnosis shall be confirmed by the designated medical examination unit. Once confirmed, the employee and their supervisor will proceed as described
for reporting on-duty injuries. All related reports shall be completed. m. The Office of the Chief of Police will forward original/copies of all documentation of the injury as required
to the Human Resources Director. 2. Off-Duty Injuries. Personnel shall submit a memorandum to the Chief of Police detailing the facts and circumstances of any personal injury sustained
while off duty which may interfere with their ability to perform their duty. Personnel shall not report for duty without notifying their supervisor of such an injury. The memorandum
to the Chief of Police shall be made within 72 hours of the injury, or as soon as the injured employee is physically capable of doing so. If the off-duty injury renders the employee
incapable of reporting for duty, the injured employee shall report this to their immediate supervisor as soon as possible and not later than the time scheduled for the beginning of
their tour of duty. If a physician is consulted concerning the off-duty injury, the employee shall submit a medical release form, signed by the physician, indicating the employee’s
fitness for duty prior to returning for duty. 3. Off-Duty Injuries During Law Enforcement Function. a. Personnel who sustain an injury during the performance of police related overtime
employment, or through the performance of a law enforcement function, such as a legal off-duty arrest, shall notify an on-duty supervisor. The injured employee shall submit a detailed
memorandum of facts, through the chain of command, to the Chief of Police within 24 hours. If the injury prevents the submission of the memorandum, it shall be submitted as soon as
the injured employee is capable of doing so. b. The supervisor shall notify the injured employee’s respective division commander immediately of the incident. If the commander is unavailable,
the Chief of Police shall be notified. c. The supervisor shall investigate the circumstances surrounding the incident and submit all reports required for an on-duty injury. 356
Item c. COUNCIL ACTIONS CALENDAR Tentative/Subject to Change MeetingDate MeetingType Name SubmittedBy 01/10/2022 Town Council Work Session DISCUSSION: Procurement Policy Revisions Andrew,
Octavia DISCUSSION: Review of IT Commission (Technology Ideas, Propose Priorities, Includes Annual Report) (P) Callahan, John INFORMATION MEMO: Hubzone (Purpose, History, Designated
Area, and Status) Turney, Elaine INFORMATION MEMO: Visit Loudoun Monthly Report Turney, Elaine 01/11/2022 Town Council Meeting CLOSED SESSION: Leesburg Mobile Home Park Smith, Carmen
CONSENT: Appointment to the Commission on Public Art (Nacy) (NP) Boeing, Eileen CONSENT: Appointment to the Tree Commission (Cummings) NP Boeing, Eileen CONSENT: Removing a Tree
Commissioner Boeing, Eileen CONSENT: Request for Regional Surface Transportation Program Funding from the Northern Virginia Transportation Authority for Fiscal Yea Southerland,
Danielle CONSENT: Requesting the Virginia Department of Transportation to Accept Certain Streets (NP) Southerland, Danielle CONSENT: Tuscarora Mill Restaurant Celebrates 36th Business
Anniversary (Sponsor: Mayor Burk) Belote, Tara MOTION: Repeal of Resolution No. 2021-154: COVID-19 Vaccination & Testing Program (NP) Boeing, Eileen PUBLIC HEARING: Employment of Off-Duty
Law Enforcement Officers (P) Smith, Carmen PUBLIC HEARING: TLOA-2021-0001 Zoning Ordinance Batch Amendments (P) Cicalese, Karen PUBLIC HEARING: TLOA-2021-0005 Administrative Review
of Certificates of Appropriateness (P) Cicalese, Karen RESOLUTION: Procurement Policy Revisions (P) Boeing, Eileen RESOLUTIONS/ORDINANCE: Virginia Village (P) Cicalese, Karen 01/24/2022
Town Council Work Session DISCUSSION: Legacy Leesburg Town Plan (P) Cicalese, Karen DISCUSSION: Town Hall Campus Improvements Phase I - Mervin Jackson East Concept (P) Southerland,
Danielle DISCUSSION: Town's Financial Advisor - Annual Financial Update (P) Fazenbaker, Cole 01/25/2022 Town Council Meeting CONSENT: Appointment to the Commission on Public Art (Fox)
- Tentative (NP) Boeing, Eileen CONSENT: Appointment to the Residential Traffic Commission (Cummings) NP - Tentative Boeing, Eileen CONSENT: Appointment to the Tree Commission (Steinberg)
- NP (Tentative) Boeing, Eileen CONSENT: Award Task Order for Replacement of Transformer at Water Pollution Control Facility Wyks, Amy CONSENT: Award Task order for SCADA upgrade
for Utilities (NP) McClaughry, Lesley CONSENT: Appropriation of School Proffers (NP) Fazenbaker, Cole CONSENT: Award a Contract for Traveling Water Screen Rebuild (NP) Wyks, Amy CONSENT:
Award Task order for Lawson Rd Route 15 Bypass Watermain Relocation (NP) McClaughry, Lesley CONSENT: Supplemental Appropriation for COVID-19 Testing (NP) Fazenbaker, Cole PROCLAMATION:
Tuscarora Mill Restaurant Celebrates 36th Business Anniversary Belote, Tara PUBLIC HEARING: TLOA-2020-0006 Natural Spring Water Extraction and Bottling Plant (P) Cicalese, Karen PUBLIC
HEARING: Town Code Change – Board and Commission Attendance Smith, Carmen 1/5/202212:40 PM 357 Item a. COUNCIL ACTIONS CALENDAR Tentative/Subject to Change MeetingDate MeetingType Name
SubmittedBy 01/25/2022 Town Council Meeting RESOLUTION: Fiscal Year 2021 Year-End Unassigned Fund Balance Appropriation (NP) Fazenbaker, Cole 02/07/2022 Town Council Work Session DISCUSSION:
Historic Downtown Loading Zone Management Study (P) Southerland, Danielle DISCUSSION: Private Property Mural Pilot Program Kosin, Leah INFORMATION MEMO: Visit Loudoun Monthly Report
Turney, Elaine 02/08/2022 Town Council Meeting CONSENT: Award Contract for Water Plant Effluent System Valves (NP) McClaughry, Lesley PRESENTATION: Town Manager's Fiscal Year 2023
Proposed Budget Fazenbaker, Cole PROCLAMATION: Black History Month Belote, Tara PUBLIC HEARING: Legacy Leesburg Town Plan Cicalese, Karen PUBLIC HEARING: 2022 Personal Property Tax
Rate (P) Fazenbaker, Cole RESOLUTION: Adoption of Fiscal Year 2023 Budget Review and Adoption Schedule Fazenbaker, Cole 02/22/2022 Town Council Meeting CONSENT: Award Contract for
Manhole Rehabilitation for Utilities (NP) McClaughry, Lesley 03/07/2022 Town Council Work Session DISCUSSION: Main Street Update Turney, Elaine DISCUSSION: Affordable Dwelling and
Accessory Housing (P) Cicalese, Karen DISCUSSION: FY23 Budget Work Session (P) Fazenbaker, Cole DISCUSSION: Legacy Leesburg Town Plan Cicalese, Karen INFORMATION MEMO: Capacity of Utility
Plants Semi Annual Report McClaughry, Lesley INFORMATION MEMO: Update on BAR Survey Results & Notification to Historic Residents Cicalese, Karen INFORMATION MEMO: Visit Loudoun Monthly
Report Turney, Elaine 03/08/2022 Town Council Meeting CONSENT: Award Contract for Industrial Coatings Application for Utilities (NP) Wyks, Amy PROCLAMATION: Women's History Month Belote,
Tara PUBLIC HEARING: 2021 Personal Property Tax Rate Public Hearing and Adoption (P) Fazenbaker, Cole 03/21/2022 Town Council Work Session DISCUSSION: FY23 Budget Work Session (P) Fazenbaker,
Cole INFORMATION MEMO: Quarterly Progress Report on Council Retreat Workplan Items Belote, Tara 03/22/2022 Town Council Meeting CONSENT: Award contract for Water Treatment Plant Filter
Underdrain and Media Replacement (NP) McClaughry, Lesley ORDINANCE: FY 2023 Budget Adoption (P) Fazenbaker, Cole ORDINANCE: Town Code Edits to Chapter 34 (Water and Sewer) Wyks, Amy
PROCLAMATION: Keep Leesburg Beautiful Belote, Tara PUBLIC HEARING: 2022 Tax Rate and Fees Ordinance Adoption (P) Fazenbaker, Cole RESOLUTION: Authorization of Zoning Ordinance Update
Cicalese, Karen RESOLUTION: FY 2023-2028 CIP Adoption (P) Fazenbaker, Cole 04/11/2022 Town Council Work Session DISCUSSION: Emergency Management Preparation for Electric Grid Failure
Impact on Electric Cars Belote, Tara DISCUSSION: Proposed Clutter Ordinance Smith, Carmen DISCUSSION: Town Facility Security Enhancements and Gun Restrictions Belote, Tara 1/5/202212:40
PM 358 Item a. COUNCIL ACTIONS CALENDAR Tentative/Subject to Change MeetingDate MeetingType Name SubmittedBy 04/11/2022 Town Council Work Session INFORMATION MEMO: Visit Loudoun Monthly
Report Turney, Elaine 04/12/2022 Town Council Meeting CONSENT: Award Contract for WPCF Solids Handling Building Roof Replacement (NP) McClaughry, Lesley CONSENT: Award Contract for
WPCF Structure Rehabilitation (NP) McClaughry, Lesley CONSENT: Award Contract for WPCF Cattail Branch Phase III (NP) McClaughry, Lesley PROCLAMATION: Arbor Day Southerland, Danielle
PROCLAMATION: Armenian Genocide Remembrance Day Belote, Tara PROCLAMATION: Sexual Assault Awareness Month Belote, Tara 04/25/2022 Town Council Work Session INFORMATION MEMO: Annual
Continuing Disclosure Requirements Related To Town Debt Case, Clark 04/26/2022 Town Council Meeting PROCLAMATION: National Drinking Water Week McClaughry, Lesley PROCLAMATION: National
Day of Prayer Belote, Tara PROCLAMATION: World Ovarian Cancer Day Belote, Tara 05/09/2022 Town Council Work Session INFORMATION MEMO: Visit Loudoun Monthly Report Turney, Elaine 05/10/2022
Town Council Meeting PROCLAMATION: Kids to Park Day Belote, Tara PROCLAMATION: Mental Health Awareness Month Belote, Tara PROCLAMATION: National Military Appreciation Month Belote,
Tara PROCLAMATION: National Police Week Belote, Tara PROCLAMATION: National Public Works Week Southerland, Danielle PUBLIC HEARING: Proposed Clutter Ordinance Smith, Carmen 05/24/2022
Town Council Meeting PROCLAMATION: National Gun Violence Awareness Day Belote, Tara PROCLAMATION: Wayne's Crossing Day Belote, Tara 06/13/2022 Town Council Work Session INFORMATION
MEMO: Visit Loudoun Monthly Report Turney, Elaine 06/14/2022 Town Council Meeting PROCLAMATION: Juneteenth Belote, Tara PROCLAMATION: LGBTQ Pride Month Belote, Tara 06/27/2022 Town
Council Work Session INFORMATION MEMO: Quarterly Progress Report on Council Retreat Workplan Items Belote, Tara 07/11/2022 Town Council Work Session INFORMATION MEMO: Visit Loudoun
Monthly Report Turney, Elaine 08/08/2022 Town Council Work Session INFORMATION MEMO: Visit Loudoun Monthly Report Turney, Elaine 08/09/2022 Town Council Meeting PROCLAMATION: International
Overdose Awareness Day Belote, Tara PROCLAMATION: National Payroll Week Belote, Tara PROCLAMATION: World Suicide Prevention Day Belote, Tara 09/13/2022 Town Council Meeting PROCLAMATION:
Childhood Cancer Awareness Month Belote, Tara PROCLAMATION: Constitution Week Belote, Tara PROCLAMATION: National Hispanic Heritage Month Belote, Tara PROCLAMATION: Relay for Life Belote,
Tara 1/5/202212:40 PM 359 Item a. COUNCIL ACTIONS CALENDAR Tentative/Subject to Change MeetingDate MeetingType Name SubmittedBy 09/26/2022 Town Council Work Session INFORMATION MEMO:
Quarterly Progress Report on Council Retreat Workplan Items Belote, Tara INFORMATION MEMO: Visit Loudoun Monthly Report Turney, Elaine 09/27/2022 Town Council Meeting PROCLAMATION:
National Polish American Heritage Month Belote, Tara PROCLAMATIONS: National Arts and Humanities Month Belote, Tara 10/24/2022 Town Council Work Session INFORMATION MEMO: Visit Loudoun
Monthly Report Turney, Elaine 11/07/2022 Town Council Work Session INFORMATION MEMO: Visit Loudoun Monthly Report Turney, Elaine 11/08/2022 Town Council Meeting PROCLAMATION: Small
Business Saturday Turney, Elaine PROCLAMATION: Diabetes Awareness Month Belote, Tara PROCLAMATION: National Veterans and Military Families Month Belote, Tara 11/29/2022 Town Council
Meeting RESOLUTION: Town Council Meeting Calendar for Year 2023 Boeing, Eileen 12/12/2022 Town Council Work Session INFORMATION MEMO: Quarterly Progress Report on Council Retreat Workplan
Items Belote, Tara INFORMATION MEMO: Visit Loudoun Monthly Report Turney, Elaine 1/5/202212:40 PM 360 Item a.