HomeMy Public PortalAbout2020-01-02 packet
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats
as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request.
Please call (573) 634-6410 with questions regarding agenda items.
Technical Committee
Thursday, January 2, 2020 at 10:00 a.m.
Meeting Location: Boone/Bancroft Room # 200, John G. Christy Municipal Building
320 E. McCarty, Jefferson City, MO 65101 - Enter through Main Lobby
1. Call to order, roll call, and determination of a quorum
2. Public comment
3. Adoption of the agenda as printed or amended
4. Approval of the minutes from the meeting of December 5, 2019
5. Communication Received
6. New Business
A. Title VI Program – DRAFT
Action Requested: Review and discussion, opening of 45-day public comment period
Staff Report: Recipients of Federal Transit Administration funding are federally required to report certain
general information to determine compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. As a recipient,
CAMPO is required to update the Title VI Program every three years. The Title VI Program includes the
federally required Public Participation Plan and Language Assistance Plan. See the attached staff report
and draft Title VI Program document for more detail.
B. Traffic Crash Analysis Report – Staff Presentation
Action Requested: Review and discussion
Staff Report: Staff has a prepared report on crash statistics as they relate to major intersections and
thoroughfares that are currently included in the CAMPO Illustrative List. See the attached report for more
detail.
C. Federal Performance Measures
Action Requested: Review, discussion, and recommendation forwarding the updated 2020 Safety
Performance targets to the Board of Directors
Staff Report: Refer to staff report on the update of the federal safety performance targets and how they
were determined.
7. Other Business
A. Status of Current Work Tasks
B. 2021-2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) – Call for projects
C. FY 2021 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) Development
D. Member Updates
8. Next Meeting Date – Thursday, February 6, 2020 at 10:00 a.m. in the Boone/Bancroft Room #200
9. Adjournment
Capital Area Metropolitan
Planning Organization
Room 120 320 E. McCarty, Jefferson City, MO 65101 Phone 573.634.6410 Fax 573.634.6457
MINUTES
TECHNICAL COMMITTEE
CAPITAL AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION
December 5, 2019
VOTING MEMBERS PRESENT
Cole County: Larry Benz
Eric Landwehr
Jefferson City: Sonny Sanders, Chairman
Eric Barron
Mark Mehmert
Britt Smith
JJ Gates, Jefferson City
MoDOT: Mike Henderson
Steve Engelbrecht
Bob Lynch
Wardsville: Paul Stonner
Pedestrian or Biking Interest: Cary Maloney
VOTING MEMBERS ABSENT
David Bange, Vice Chairman, Jefferson City
Paul Winkelmann, Callaway County
Sonny Sanders, Chairman, Jefferson City
Mark Tate, Holts Summit
Matt Morasch, Jefferson City
Joe Scheppers, Private Transportation Interest
EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS ABSENT
Brad McMahon, Federal Highway Administration
Jeremiah Shuler, Federal Transit Administration
STAFF PRESENT (Non-Voting)
Katrina Williams, Transportation Planner
Lee Bowden, Transportation Planner
Beth Sweeten, Administrative Assistant
GUESTS PRESENT
Kim Tipton, MoDOT
1. Call to order, roll call, and determination of a quorum
Mr. Sanders called the meeting to order at 10:00 a.m. and asked Ms. Sweeten to call roll. A quorum of 12
voting members or their designee was present.
2. Public comment
None
3. Adoption of the agenda as printed or amended
Mr. Benz moved and Mr. Smith seconded to adopt the agenda as printed. The motion passed unanimously.
4. Approval of the minutes from the meeting of October 3, 2019
Mr. Benz moved and Mr. Smith seconded to approve the minutes from the meeting of October 3, 2019 as
written. The motion passed unanimously.
5. Communications from the presiding officer
Ms. Williams handed out an email from Mr. McMahon regarding alternative fuel corridor designations.
Minutes/Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Technical Committee
December 5, 2019 Page 2
6. New Business
A. Title VI Program - Draft
Ms. Williams asked everyone to turn to the draft in their packet. She explained that The Federal Transit
Administration requires recipients to report certain general information to determine compliance with Title
VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The collection and reporting of this information constitutes a
recipient’s Title VI Program. To ensure compliance with 49 CFR Section 21.9 (b), the FTA requires that
all recipients document their compliance with this chapter by submitting a Title VI Program to the FTA’s
regional civil rights officer once every three years. As subrecipients, the Capital Area Metropolitan
Planning Organization submits the information contained in this plan to their primary recipient, MoDOT,
on a schedule to be determined by the primary recipient, and is to be included as part of their Title VI
Program.
She stated the plan includes the Public Participation Plan, Language Assistance Plan, and other CAMPO
forms and protocols. She asks that members review the document and send any edits to her.
7. Other Business
A. Status of current work tasks
• Title VI Program update (including Public Participation Plan, Language Assistance Plan).
See Staff Report
• Federal Performance Measures. Staff continues collaborating with MODOT staff concerning
various federal performance measures required by MAP-21 and the FAST Act.
• Jefferson City Data Assistance. Staff is working with other Jefferson City planners in providing
data and mapping assistance in the update of the of the City’s Comprehensive Plan.
• Major Thoroughfare Plan Development. Staff is developing a process for creation of a Major
Thoroughfare Plan. The Major Thoroughfare Plan will be developed through stakeholder input
and will pull directly from the recently completed Travel Demand Model.
B. Election of Officers
Mr. Benz Made a motion to retain the current Chairman, Sonny Sanders, and the Vice Chairman,
David Bange. Mr. Mehmert seconded and the motion passes unanimously.
C. Adoption of the 2020 Meeting Schedule
Mr. Henderson made a motion to accept the meeting calendar as presented. Mr. Benz seconded the
motion. The motion passes unanimously.
D. Member Updates
Jefferson City
--Mr. Bange gave an update on the following: (1) Dunklin Street Bridge replacement and corridor
project; and (2) E. High Street curb, gutter and sidewalk project
--Mr. Smith gave an update on the overlay project; and (2) High Street project is out to bid; (3) airport
flood repairs
--Mr. Mehmert gave an update on the bus barn and repairs needed.
--Mr. Barron gave an update on the City’s Comprehensive Plan Update
--Mr. Gates gave an update on the following: (1) Community park; (2) Bids for Riverside
improvements and to McClung parking lot.
Cole County
--Mr. Landwehr gave an update on the following: (1) Tanner Bridge Road safety improvement project;
(2) South Brook stormwater project; and (3) Apache Flat stormwater study
MoDOT
--Mr. Lynch gave the following updates: (1) Updating 54/63 to interstate standards
--Mr. Henderson stated the Machelle Watkins is the new MoDOT District Engineer.
(Pedestrian or Biking Interest
--Mr. Maloney gave an update on the Recreational Trail Project at Binder Lake
Mr. Smith left at 10:54 a.m.
Minutes/Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Technical Committee
December 5, 2019 Page 3
8. Next Meeting Date - Thursday, January 2, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. in the Boone/Bancroft Room.
9. Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 10:54 a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Beth Sweeten, Administrative Assistant
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570
to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three
business days to process the request.
CAMPO Technical Committee Staff Report
Title VI Program Update
January 2, 2020
Summary
The Federal Transit Administration requires recipients to report certain general information to determine
compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The collection and reporting of this information
constitutes a recipient’s Title VI Program. To ensure compliance with 49 CFR Section 21.9 (b), the FTA
requires that all recipients document their compliance with this chapter by submitting a Title VI Program to the
FTA’s regional civil rights officer once every three years. As subrecipients, the Capital Area Metropolitan
Planning Organization submits the information contained in this plan to their primary recipient, MoDOT, on a
schedule to be determined by the primary recipient, and is to be included as part of their Title VI Program.
The plan consists of copies of many of our documents along with our activities involving civil rights:
• Title VI annual certifications and assurances
• Title VI Notice to the Public
• Title VI Complaint Procedures
• Title VI Complaint Form
• List of Transit-Related Title VI Investigations, Complaints, and Lawsuits
• Public Participation Plan
• Language Assistance Plan
• Committee Membership
• Demographic Profile of CAMPO & Maps
• Responses to several Title VI questions
The draft document is included with this staff report and is available on the CAMPO webpage at.
https://www.jeffersoncitymo.gov/campo.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends opening a 45 day public comment period and review of the draft document. Any edits or
comments should be forwarded to Katrina Williams at 573-637-6536 or kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org.
Agenda Item 6A
Page | 1
Traffic Crash Analysis 2019
Introduction
This Traffic Crash Analysis is designed to provide an overview of the crash data for the Capital Area Metropolitan
Planning Organization (CAMPO). It focuses specifically on the number of crashes that have occurred overall and in
specific areas that have resulted in significant property damage, injury, or death. Data was provided by the Missouri
Department of Transportation (MoDOT), with the assistance of the Missouri State Highway Patrol (MSHP) for traffic
incidents in the CAMPO region from 2013-2017. This Traffic Crash Analysis is intended to be used internally by CAMPO
planners to identify and address areas of safety concerns.
Accident Analysis
From 2013 to 2017 there were 7738 accidents within the CAMPO region. Of those 7738 accidents, 1954 of
them resulted in both minor and serious injuries, and 34 resulted in fatalities. The fatality ratio for the CAMPO region is
well below the national rate of 0.67%, with only 0.44% of all accidents in the CAMPO region resulting in a fatality. To
reduce that number of fatalities to 0, we need to look at specific areas that may be of concern. Through statistical
analysis of the available data we will be able to make more informed decisions, seek out hot spot locations, and find real
solutions to get CAMPO and MoDOT to that zero fatality goal. The table below looks at the number of accidents per
year. We see an outlier in 2016 where accident numbers spiked in the CAMPO region, then leveled out afterwards. The
Missouri State Highway Patrol contributed the larger number of traffic accidents in 2016 to the drop in fuel prices that
happened the same year increasing the amount of travel people did in 2016.
Page | 2
When we look at the Fatalities per year we see that the number was climbing till 2015 then leveled out. From
2016 to 2017 we see a 25% decrease in fatalities. The MoDOT statewide safety targets show that they want to see a
13% decrease in fatalities. CAMPO supports these targets and likes to see numbers region wide to be in line with the
statewide targets. MoDOT set a fatality rate goal of just over 1 per 100 million vehicle miles traveled. That is a
statewide target that includes long stretches of rural roads. CAMPO is a small area with a lot less vehicle miles traveled,
so CAMPO saw a fatality rate of 285 per 100 million vehicle miles traveled. That is much higher than the statewide
average due to the fact that we are a small MPO any change in numbers makes a drastic change in rates and
percentages.
The following is a look at the Severe or Serious injuries per year. From 2013 to 2017 we have seen that number
fall from 76 serious injuries to just 42. That is a 45% reduction is severe injuries in a 5 year span. From 2016 to 2017
CAMPO only saw a 6.7% decrease in serious injuries. MoDOT set a statewide safety target of 8% decrease per year.
Also MoDOT set a serious injury rate of just under 6 severe injuries per 100 million vehicle miles traveled. Again because
CAMPO is a small area our rate is just under 2000 per 100 million miles traveled, much higher than the statewide rate.
Page | 3
Page | 4
There are 17 crash type categories that incidents are placed into when reported. In the CAMPO region the most
common crash type is the rear end collision, with 2257 accidents making up almost 30% of all accidents in the region.
Out of Control crashes are the second most reported crash type in the CAMPO area with 1427 accidents and making up
18% of all accidents in the region. Other classifications include pedestrians, pedal-cycles, and other animals just to name
a few.
Page | 5
As was established by the previous graph, the majority of accidents are rear end collisions, resulting in injury
almost 25% of the time and make up about 28% of all injuries in the area. Then numbers that jump out at you are the
pedestrian and pedal-cycle both result in injury over 90% of the time and make up just over 4% of all injuries in the
region. Luckily we only had 1 fatality in that 5 year span.
* Injury % of Type indicates the percentage that the total number of accidents of that type of crash resulted in injury.
* Injury % of Total indicates the percentage of injuries of that type of crash by the total number of injuries in the region.
Type of Crash Fatality Serious Injuries All Injuries Damage Only Total Injury % of Type Injury % of Total
REAR END 2 24 551 1706 2257 24.41%28.20%
OUT OF CONTROL 16 72 475 952 1427 33.29%24.31%
LEFT TURN RIGHT ANGLE COLLISION 0 14 153 518 671 22.80%7.83%
RIGHT ANGLE 1 17 196 366 562 34.88%10.03%
PARKING OR PARKED CAR 0 2 47 470 517 9.09%2.41%
LEFT TURN 2 14 144 360 504 28.57%7.37%
PASSING 1 5 43 434 477 9.01%2.20%
HEAD ON 8 10 114 139 253 45.06%5.83%
DEER 0 1 22 191 213 10.33%1.13%
RIGHT TURN RIGHT ANGLE COLLISION 0 0 24 138 162 14.81%1.23%
OTHER 2 3 22 106 128 17.19%1.13%
CHANGING LANE 0 2 13 81 94 13.83%0.67%
BACKING 0 1 2 79 81 2.47%0.10%
SIDESWIPE 0 4 16 58 74 21.62%0.82%
PEDESTRIAN 1 22 64 4 68 94.12%3.28%
RIGHT TURN 0 1 6 51 57 10.53%0.31%
FIXED OBJECT 0 1 7 35 42 16.67%0.36%
U - TURN 0 1 8 31 39 20.51%0.41%
AVOIDING 0 2 17 15 32 53.13%0.87%
PEDALCYCLE 0 7 22 2 24 91.67%1.13%
DUAL LEFTS COLLIDE 0 0 1 14 15 6.67%0.05%
CROSS MEDIAN 1 0 5 3 8 62.50%0.26%
DOG 0 0 0 8 8 0.00%0.00%
FARM ANIMAL 0 0 0 8 8 0.00%0.00%
ANIMAL NOT DEER/DOG/FARM ANIMAL 0 1 1 5 6 16.67%0.05%
JACKKNIFE 0 0 0 6 6 0.00%0.00%
DUAL RIGHTS COLLIDE 0 0 1 4 5 20.00%0.05%
Grand Total 34 204 1954 5784 7738 25.25%100.00%
Page | 6
When taking a deeper look at where the majority of total accidents within the CAMPO region take place, the
area of focus narrows to just Jefferson City. That’s not to say that bad accidents don’t happen in the outer communities
within the CAMPO area such as Holts Summit, St. Martins, Taos, and Wardsville. It is worth noting that a little over half
of the fatalities in the region occurred on US 50 or US 54 outside the city limits. With Jefferson City hosting the bulk of
the area’s residents and a major producer of employment it is understandable that the large quantities of travelers
within city limits result in such a high rate of accidents of all types for the region. Below is a map depicting the various
crash types clustered throughout the city.
Page | 7
To search out the hotspots with higher rates of accidents each accident within the city was assigned to the
segment of road it occurred on. Once that is done we could take each section and classify them to figure out what
section has the most accidents in it. As you can see in the map below it really highlights sections of road that we need to
look at, such as sections of Missouri Blvd, the Missouri River Bridge, and US 50/63.
Page | 8
After looking at that map it still leaves a lot of questions that need to be answered. One being that every stretch
of road is of a different length. To more evenly weight longer segments of roads to shorter segments of roads the
accidents were calculated to an accident per foot ratio which tells a little different crash story in some areas. This
analysis highlighted a few more areas to look at like Truman Blvd, Ellis/54, Jefferson/54, and the Tri-level.
Page | 9
When combining the different analysis we found 9 areas of concern that we need to focus on more were
highlighted. These 9 areas host the most congestion and highest traffic counts inside the CAMPO region. While these 9
areas make up less than 5% of total miles inside the CAMPO region, they have more than 41% of the total accidents in
the region.
Areas of Concern Fatalities
Serious
Injuries
All
Injusries Damage Only Total
Injury Rate vs
CAMPO Total
Crash Rate vs
CAMPO Total
The Bridge 0 4 84 268 352 4.30%4.55%
US 50/63, US 54 to Lafayette St 0 17 151 421 572 7.73%7.39%
Tri Level 0 7 60 174 234 3.07%3.02%
MO Blvd, Stoneridge Pkwy to US 50 3 19 248 679 927 12.69%11.98%
MO Blvd, Country Club to Stoneridge 0 6 111 321 432 5.68%5.58%
Jefferson St and 54 Hwy 0 5 47 154 201 2.41%2.60%
Ellis Blvd and 54 Hwy 1 3 36 186 222 1.84%2.87%
US 50/ Dix Rd 0 2 40 76 116 2.05%1.50%
Truman Blvd and Hwy 50 0 2 41 119 160 2.10%2.07%
9 Areas 4 65 818 2398 3216 41.86%41.56%
All CAMPO Region 34 204 1954 5784 7738 100.00%100.00%
Page | 10
1. The Bridge
The bridge over the Missouri River is the convergence of major highways US 54 and US 63. It is one of the most
congested roads in our area because it is one of the few Missouri River crossings in Central Missouri, and separates
Jefferson City from everything to the north. Traffic counts on the bridge show just over 53000 cars cross the bridge on a
daily basis. From 2013 to 2017, 352 accidents took place on the Missouri River Bridge. This comes out to 4.56% of all
accidents in the CAMPO area for less than 2 miles of road. Due to the accidents and the congestion on the bridge, it
becomes our main area of focus and is number one on CAMPO’s Illustrative Projects list in the Metropolitan
Transportation Plan.
Page | 11
The data of the accidents on the bridge shows that most accidents and injuries that happen are due to speed or
rear end collisions. As number one in our system performance projects list, we look at MoDOT to construct direct
connector for northbound to westbound movement to improve capacity and to widen US 54/63 to provide three
continuous lanes in each direction as well as additional acceleration and deceleration lanes. Dispersing vehicles across
more lanes should decrease congestion and as a result should decrease the chances of accidents.
Type of Crash Serious Injuries All Injuries Damage Only Total Injury % of Type Injury % of Total
REAR END 4 46 122 168 27.38%54.76%
OUT OF CONTROL 2 23 49 72 31.94%27.38%
PASSING 0 6 60 66 9.09%7.14%
CHANGING LANE 0 1 10 11 9.09%1.19%
OTHER 0 1 6 7 14.29%1.19%
LEFT TURN RIGHT ANGLE COLLISION 0 1 4 5 20.00%1.19%
RIGHT ANGLE 0 2 2 4 50.00%2.38%
FIXED OBJECT 0 1 2 3 33.33%1.19%
HEAD ON 0 2 1 3 66.67%2.38%
PARKING OR PARKED CAR 0 0 3 3 0.00%0.00%
AVOIDING 0 0 2 2 0.00%0.00%
LEFT TURN 0 0 2 2 0.00%0.00%
RIGHT TURN RIGHT ANGLE COLLISION 0 0 2 2 0.00%0.00%
DUAL LEFTS COLLIDE 0 0 1 1 0.00%0.00%
JACKKNIFE 0 0 1 1 0.00%0.00%
PEDESTRIAN 0 1 0 1 100.00%1.19%
U - TURN 0 0 1 1 0.00%0.00%
Grand Total 6 84 268 352 23.86%100.00%
Page | 12
2. US 50/63, US 54 to Lafayette Street
The second area of concern is US 50/63 from US 54 to Lafayette Street. We see that 7.4% of all accidents inside
of the CAMPO region happen on this few mile stretch of road. This single stretch of road serves as a converging point
for 2 major highways, US 50 and US 63, with several stop lights that prevent smooth continuous movement through this
segment that boasts an average daily traffic count of 43000 vehicles. Congestion from the series of traffic signals, and a
high traffic count, factor into why this section has such a high rate of crash incidents, leading to why it is number 2
priority on our Illustrative Projects list.
US 50/63, US 54 to Lafayette St Accidents
Page | 13
While the majority of crashes are rear end crashes the most concerning numbers are the right angle and left
turn collisions. Both have higher injury numbers and high injury rates. Because of the laws of physics we know that
accidents get increasingly dangerous at higher speeds (more energy), quicker stops (dispersing energy), and sharp angles
(opposing energies). Right angle and left turn collisions tend to be sharp angle accidents and because of that are more
dangerous. Another big concern is the pedestrian accidents. Every time there is a vehicle hitting a person it almost
always results in some sort of injury. With as much traffic as there is on this road having pedestrians cross the road is
always dangerous. Through cooperation with MoDOT we look to implement major capacity improvements, which could
include mainline widening, grade separations, and/or outer roads. That should improve some of the congestion in this
area. Due to money constraints it is hard to come up with a fix all solution in this area.
Type of Crash Serious Injuries All Injuries Damage Only Total Injury % of Type Injury % of Total
REAR END 4 77 244 321 23.99%50.99%
RIGHT ANGLE 4 30 42 72 41.67%19.87%
PASSING 1 2 35 37 5.41%1.32%
LEFT TURN 4 12 19 31 38.71%7.95%
OUT OF CONTROL 1 8 13 21 38.10%5.30%
LEFT TURN RIGHT ANGLE COLLISION 0 4 15 19 21.05%2.65%
HEAD ON 1 8 9 17 47.06%5.30%
PARKING OR PARKED CAR 0 2 15 17 11.76%1.32%
CHANGING LANE 0 0 12 12 0.00%0.00%
RIGHT TURN RIGHT ANGLE COLLISION 0 4 8 12 33.33%2.65%
PEDESTRIAN 2 4 0 4 100.00%2.65%
RIGHT TURN 0 0 3 3 0.00%0.00%
BACKING 0 0 2 2 0.00%0.00%
DUAL RIGHTS COLLIDE 0 0 1 1 0.00%0.00%
OTHER 0 0 1 1 0.00%0.00%
SIDESWIPE 0 0 1 1 0.00%0.00%
U - TURN 0 0 1 1 0.00%0.00%
Grand Total 17 151 421 572 26.40%100.00%
Page | 14
One more analysis we wanted to look at were accidents per intersection on US 50/63. When we ran this
analysis two intersections stood out. The intersection of US 50/63 and Missouri Blvd has had over 100 accidents in the 5
year span. Second is the intersection of US 50/63 and Madison Street. That intersection has had over 50 accidents in
the 5 year span. We may need to look at these intersections a little closer in the future to determine what makes them
more dangerous than others and to find any possible solutions.
Page | 15
3. The Tri-Level
The third area we want to look at is the Tri-Level. This intersection complex is the convergence of 3 major
highways, US 50, 63, and 54. Nearly 80,000 vehicles travel through this interchange on a daily basis. This is the largest
traffic count totals for one area in the entire CAMPO region. This segment accounts for 3% of all accidents. Accidents
and slowdowns in the vicinity of the Tri-level lead to compounding congestion and backups throughout the rest of the
city as travelers sit and wait for traffic to start moving again, or others detour into other parts of town onto roads with
less capacity in an attempt to avoid or go around the trouble zone.
Page | 16
When looking at the numbers of all accidents that happened in the Tri-Level interchange we can see that the
majority of accidents are rear end collisions. While crash totals may not be as high on the Tri-level as other places, it’s
impossible to ignore how important accident reduction is for this area. Over a 5 year span 7 accidents resulted in
serious injury. One of those injured included a pedestrian. Current design conditions on the Tri-level force travelers to
navigate merging and lane crossing for exits in a tight space that can be confusing and distracting for drivers. In the
Illustrative Projects list MoDOT has indicated this same issue. The project proposes to reconfigure the interchange to
provide non-conflicting system-to-system movement. This complete reconfiguration of the interchange would help
improve congestion not only in the Tri-Level but on the highways and several outer roads in the area.
Type of Crash Serious Injuries All Injuries Damage Only Total Injury % of Type Injury % of Total
REAR END 2 30 110 140 21.43%50.00%
OUT OF CONTROL 2 10 14 24 41.67%16.67%
PASSING 0 1 21 22 4.55%1.67%
RIGHT ANGLE 0 5 9 14 35.71%8.33%
LEFT TURN 1 5 6 11 45.45%8.33%
CHANGING LANE 0 0 7 7 0.00%0.00%
HEAD ON 0 3 1 4 75.00%5.00%
FIXED OBJECT 0 2 1 3 66.67%3.33%
RIGHT TURN RIGHT ANGLE COLLISION 0 2 1 3 66.67%3.33%
OTHER 0 0 2 2 0.00%0.00%
LEFT TURN RIGHT ANGLE COLLISION 0 0 1 1 0.00%0.00%
PEDESTRIAN 1 1 0 1 100.00%1.67%
RIGHT TURN 0 0 1 1 0.00%0.00%
SIDESWIPE 1 1 0 1 100.00%1.67%
Grand Total 7 60 174 234 25.64%100.00%
Page | 17
4. Missouri Blvd, Stoneridge Pkwy to US 50
Because Missouri Blvd is a long stretch of road we split it into two sections. First we are going to look at the east
section that runs from Stoneridge Pkwy to US 50. This is one of the most congested business and retail sections in the
CAMPO region. This section of Missouri Blvd receives around 46000 vehicles on a daily basis. Just fewer than 12% of all
accidents in the CAMPO region happen in this several mile stretch of road and over our 5 year span this segment saw 3
fatalities. Due to the dangerous nature of this stretch of road it shows up as number 26 on CAMPO’s Illustrative Projects
System Performance list.
Page | 18
When we look at the numbers we see that most of the accidents in this stretch of road are rear end collisions,
like most areas in Jefferson City, and left turn collisions. Of the 927 accidents over 60% of all injuries in these accidents
happen because of those types of accidents. Left turn accidents alone result in almost half of all the serious injuries on
Missouri Blvd. Another concern on this part of the road is pedestrian accidents, 6 accidents, 4 of which were serious
injuries, and 1 resulting in a fatality over our 5 year period of interest. These accidents took place before the latest
construction of sidewalks along this stretch. This project is just a tier 2 project on CAMPO’s Illustrative Projects list.
With MoDOT’s cooperation, the project looks to improve access management along Missouri Blvd, including
improvements to intersection, restrictions to turning movements, and improvements to pedestrian safety.
Accomplishing this project in a cost effective manner without hurting businesses in the area while improving safety will
be a challenge that will require many levels of partnerships to be formed.
* indicates a fatality in that type of crash.
Type of Crash Serious Injuries All Injuries Damage Only Total Injury % of Type Injury % of Total
REAR END 90 277 367 24.52%36.29%
LEFT TURN RIGHT ANGLE COLLISION 4 43 121 164 26.22%17.34%
LEFT TURN 4 29 49 78 37.18%11.69%
PASSING 7 70 77 9.09%2.82%
RIGHT ANGLE 1 20 42 62 32.26%8.06%
HEAD ON 1 21 19 40 52.50%8.47%
RIGHT TURN RIGHT ANGLE COLLISION 11 28 39 28.21%4.44%
OUT OF CONTROL 1*10 18 28 35.71%4.03%
CHANGING LANE 1 17 18 5.56%0.40%
RIGHT TURN 1 2 13 15 13.33%0.81%
OTHER 1 5 9 14 35.71%2.02%
BACKING 1 1 6 7 14.29%0.40%
DUAL LEFTS COLLIDE 6 6 0.00%0.00%
PEDESTRIAN 4*6 6 100.00%2.42%
SIDESWIPE 1 4 5 20.00%0.40%
CROSS MEDIAN 1*1 1 100.00%0.40%
Grand Total 19 248 679 927 26.75%100.00%
Page | 19
Now we wanted to narrow the scope even more on this section of Missouri Blvd to see where these accidents
took place the most. By assigning the accidents to a section of road we can see that 2 sections are highlighted by this
analysis. The first area of interest is between Stadium Blvd and Heisinger Rd. This area has several large businesses in
that area resulting in a lot of vehicles pulling in and out of parking lots. Knowing that there are no stop lights between
Stadium Blvd and Dix Rd, you can see how turning across traffic into one of these businesses without a break in traffic is
a challenge. The second section of concern is between Dunklin Rd and US 50/63. Most of these accidents assigned to
this section happened in the intersection of Missouri Blvd and US 50/63, and was covered in a previous section.
Page | 20
To paint a more thorough picture, we wanted to see how many accidents per foot happened on this section of
road. This shows that there are sections of road that accidents happen every 15 feet or less. First we see a section
again around Heisinger Rd and, as stated by the previous analysis, we know that that section lacks stop lights to break up
the traffic and allows access for people turning in and out of area businesses. The second section is from Dix Rd east
through the light at Southwest Blvd in front of a large grocery store. That area again has a lot of larger businesses in the
area with people turning in and out of parking lots. This section however has lights to create traffic breaks, but results in
more rear end collisions at those lights. The last section is from Kansas St to US 50/63. This section has several lights
that stop traffic and result in the majority of accidents happening at these intersections, most of which are rear end
collisions.
Page | 21
When we look at the intersections in this stretch of Missouri Blvd we see a few that stand out. First is the
intersection of Missouri Blvd and US 50/63. We talked about that several times before and know that it is a problem
intersection to look at. The next intersection that stands out is Dix Rd and Missouri Blvd. As one of the few connectors
that allow traffic to flow to and from US 50, the intersection of Dix Rd. and Missouri Blvd sees a lot of travelers on a daily
basis and boasts accident numbers to match.
Rear end collisions go up at stop lights, so when you see an intersection without a stop light having elevated
numbers it raises some questions. Looking at Blair Dr. we see that there are 2 larger fast food restaurants at that
intersection, but no stop light. We will look at it in a little more detail in the maps below.
Page | 22
Missouri Blvd Cont.
In the maps below, it shows where each accident happened along Missouri Blvd starting at the intersection of
US 50/63 and moving east till we get to Stoneridge. The First map you can see the section that we discussed earlier
between US 50/63 and Dunklin Rd shows the majority of the accidents taking place at the intersection of US 50/63, and
the majority of those are rear end collisions as indicated in green.
Page | 23
As we move down the Blvd we see that several different kinds of accidents happen but don’t seem to be
clustered in this section.
Page | 24
In this section of Missouri Blvd we start to see clusters. First is the cluster in front of the local McDonalds. Most
of the wrecks are turning accidents either in or out of the parking lot. That includes one fatality. The second cluster is
around Southwest Blvd intersection. There are several large businesses in that area with accidents mainly rear end
collisions, but several left turn collisions as well, including 2 fatal accidents in this cluster.
Page | 25
The next section we see a large cluster of several types of accidents around the Dix Rd intersection. This
includes rear end collisions, turning collisions, right angle collisions, and several others that result in injuries. But we also
see the clusters around Blair Dr. and Heisinger Rd. Again we see a lot of rear end and turning collisions. With no lights
in this area it can be difficult to safely turn across traffic.
Page | 26
As we travel farther down Missouri Blvd towards Stadium we see several more turning accidents in and out of
parking lots along this stretch.
Page | 27
Slowly we see the volume of accidents dissipate as we get closer to Stoneridge Pkwy.
Page | 28
5. Missouri Blvd, Country Club Dr to Stoneridge Pkwy
Fifth on our list of area of concerns is Missouri Blvd from Country Club Dr. to Stoneridge Pkwy. This section of
road contains several large businesses as well as a few auto dealerships and one major highway interchange. This
section of Missouri Blvd sees just over 33000 vehicles daily. With that type of traffic volume through this area it is easy
to see why 5.6% of all accidents in the CAMPO region happen in this stretch of Missouri Blvd. Because of the known
issues on this section of road it also shows up in CAMPO’s Illustrative Projects list.
Page | 29
When we look a little deeper at the statistics of the accidents on this stretch of Missouri Blvd we see a few
things that stick out. Like every other area in the CAMPO region rear end collisions are the highest number of collisions.
We also see that several accidents are left turn collisions. As we talked about before we know that this type of wreck is
dangerous because of the angles of the collisions. This is a concern for all of Missouri Blvd. This area also sees high
numbers of out of control accidents and head on collisions.
The known issues on this section of road brings 2 projects to CAMPO’s Illustrative Projects System Performance
list. First shows up as number 7, which is on Missouri Blvd, the eastern Lowe’s entrance to S. 10 Mile Dr. The project
looks to address access management along the corridor, including turn restrictions, additional traffic control, and safety
along that stretch of road. The second shows up as number 22 on that list. It proposes a project on Missouri Blvd from
Country Club Dr. to Howerton Ct. to widen the road to 5 lanes that will include a right turn lane at Howerton Ct. Both
projects should really help with the safety by reducing the number of left turn collisions. The second project in
particular should help reduce the number of out of control and head on accidents.
Type of Crash Serious Injuries All Injuries Damage Only Total Injury % of Type Injury % of Total
REAR END 2 40 140 180 22.22%36.04%
LEFT TURN RIGHT ANGLE COLLISION 0 18 48 66 27.27%16.22%
LEFT TURN 0 16 31 47 34.04%14.41%
PASSING 0 2 32 34 5.88%1.80%
OUT OF CONTROL 1 11 18 29 37.93%9.91%
HEAD ON 1 11 8 19 57.89%9.91%
RIGHT ANGLE 0 4 8 12 33.33%3.60%
CHANGING LANE 1 3 8 11 27.27%2.70%
OTHER 0 1 7 8 12.50%0.90%
RIGHT TURN RIGHT ANGLE COLLISION 0 0 6 6 0.00%0.00%
DEER 0 0 4 4 0.00%0.00%
U - TURN 0 1 3 4 25.00%0.90%
AVOIDING 0 1 2 3 33.33%0.90%
DUAL LEFTS COLLIDE 0 0 2 2 0.00%0.00%
RIGHT TURN 0 0 2 2 0.00%0.00%
BACKING 0 0 1 1 0.00%0.00%
DUAL RIGHTS COLLIDE 0 1 0 1 100.00%0.90%
PEDALCYCLE 0 1 0 1 100.00%0.90%
PEDESTRIAN 1 1 0 1 100.00%0.90%
SIDESWIPE 0 0 1 1 0.00%0.00%
Grand Total 6 111 321 432 25.69%100.00%
Page | 30
6. Jefferson St. and 54 Hwy
The 6th area of concern is intersections of Jefferson St, Stadium Blvd, Christy Dr., and US 54. If you have ever
driven through this area you know it is a confusing group of intersections and short runout lanes onto a major highway.
With just under 40000 vehicles going through this area on US 54 per day and about 8000 vehicles per intersection it isn’t
hard to see why this is an area of concern. We see about 2.6% of all the accidents that happen in the CAMPO region
happen in this complex of intersection. Again this is a known issue area and that is why it shows up on CAMPO’s
Illustrative Projects list.
Page | 31
When we look into the accidents that happen in this area we see some different numbers than what we see in
most of the CAMPO region. First we see most of the accidents are out of control accidents. That tends to be more
speed related. With the small acceleration and deceleration lanes on and off of US 54, the disparity of speeds it creates
an environment for accidents. With 1 roundabout already having been installed in this complex of intersections it raises
the question if that is why we see rear end collision rates dropping due to less flow interruption. In CAMPO’s Illustrative
Projects list, with MoDOT’s help, project number 9 proposes installing roundabouts at both hook ramp intersections to
improve operations and address offsets and angles of these roads. Logic says that should help with some of these
wrecks. It does not change the small runout lanes on and off of US 54 but does keep from stopping traffic on these
ramps. This may still be an issue that we need to look at in the future to address the rest of the issues with this group of
intersections.
Type of Crash Serious Injuries All Injuries Damage Only Total Injury % of Type Injury % of Total
OUT OF CONTROL 4 23 46 69 33.33%48.94%
REAR END 0 10 47 57 17.54%21.28%
PASSING 0 2 18 20 10.00%4.26%
RIGHT ANGLE 0 6 11 17 35.29%12.77%
LEFT TURN RIGHT ANGLE COLLISION 0 1 12 13 7.69%2.13%
RIGHT TURN RIGHT ANGLE COLLISION 0 0 7 7 0.00%0.00%
CHANGING LANE 0 1 5 6 16.67%2.13%
HEAD ON 0 2 2 4 50.00%4.26%
LEFT TURN 0 1 3 4 25.00%2.13%
DEER 0 0 1 1 0.00%0.00%
PEDESTRIAN 1 1 0 1 100.00%2.13%
RIGHT TURN 0 0 1 1 0.00%0.00%
SIDESWIPE 0 0 1 1 0.00%0.00%
Grand Total 5 47 154 201 23.38%100.00%
Page | 32
7. Ellis Blvd and 54 Hwy
The 7th area of concern is the Ellis Blvd and US 54 interchange. This area sees about 40000 vehicles on US 54
through this interchange and around 20000 vehicles on Ellis Blvd through these intersections. Congestion issues at this
interchange results in about 2.9% of all crashes in the CAMPO region. For anyone who travels this area, the grouping of
lights through this interchange slows traffic flow particularly during rush hour times. Again because this is a known issue
area it shows up on CAMPO’s Illustrative Projects list.
Page | 33
When we dig into the numbers at the Ellis Blvd interchange we see another surprising issue. Left turn accidents
happen more often than rear end collisions. Left turn accidents are dangerous because of the angles that happen in the
collision. This dangerous collision type has resulted in a fatality wreck in this interchange. Knowing that there are
several larger businesses in this stretch of road gives insight into why there are so many vehicles that cross traffic
resulting in wrecks. As was indicated earlier, this area is a known issue and with MoDOT’s help, it shows up in CAMPO’s
Illustrative Projects list as number 13. The project proposes a reconfiguration of the interchange to address capacity and
close spacing of outer roads and create pedestrian connections on Southwest Blvd and Ellis Blvd from Ford St to
Southridge Dr. This should help with the congestion in the interchange but it may need to look at addressing the turning
across traffic issue.
Type of Crash Serious Injuries All Injuries Damage Only Total Injury % of Type Injury % of Total
LEFT TURN 1*9 57 66 13.64%25.00%
REAR END 1 11 51 62 17.74%30.56%
LEFT TURN RIGHT ANGLE COLLISION 0 1 23 24 4.17%2.78%
RIGHT ANGLE 0 5 15 20 25.00%13.89%
HEAD ON 0 5 10 15 33.33%13.89%
PASSING 0 0 10 10 0.00%0.00%
RIGHT TURN RIGHT ANGLE COLLISION 0 2 7 9 22.22%5.56%
OUT OF CONTROL 0 1 5 6 16.67%2.78%
RIGHT TURN 0 0 3 3 0.00%0.00%
CHANGING LANE 0 0 2 2 0.00%0.00%
AVOIDING 0 0 1 1 0.00%0.00%
PEDALCYCLE 1 1 0 1 100.00%2.78%
SIDESWIPE 0 0 1 1 0.00%0.00%
CROSS MEDIAN 0 1 0 1 100.00%2.78%
DUAL LEFTS COLLIDE 0 0 1 1 0.00%0.00%
Grand Total 3 36 186 222 16.22%100.00%
Page | 34
When we analyze the data we see that there is an issue of a high amount of accidents per foot on this section of
Ellis Blvd.
Page | 35
8. US 50/Dix Rd
The 8th area of concern is the US 50/Dix Rd interchange. This interchange accounts for 1.5% of all crashes in the
CAMPO region. The biggest concern with this interchange is that whatever happens in this interchange causes
congestion on a major highway in the city and on a principal artery for the city, that being US 50 and Missouri Blvd.
Around 40000 vehicles cross this area on US 50 every day. About 13000 vehicles cross this interchange on Dix Rd each
day. With that much volume in the area it is easy to see why it is an issue with congestion every time something
happens. Just like all the other areas of concern, this area is a known issue to MoDOT as well as CAMPO. And just like
the other areas it shows up in CAMPO’s Illustrative Projects list.
Page | 36
When we dive into the numbers we see like so many other areas in the CAMPO region most of the accidents are
rear end collisions. Because of the volume of traffic and the setup of the intersection we see a lot of right angle
collisions as well. As discussed earlier any time you have hard angle collisions the seriousness and likelihood of injuries
goes up. Because this is a known issue area it shows up as number 5 on CAMPO’s Illustrative Projects System
Performance list. The project proposes reconfiguring interchange and Dix Rd approaches to address capacity issues
including lack of left-turn lanes, possibly consider a dumbbell roundabout interchange, as well as widening Dix Rd to
provide center turn lane and pedestrian access from US 50 to Missouri Blvd. This project should be exactly what was
needed for any safety issues in this interchange.
Type of Crash Serious Injuries All Injuries Damage Only Total Injury % of Type Injury % of Total
REAR END 1 16 31 47 34.04%40.00%
LEFT TURN RIGHT ANGLE COLLISION 1 9 15 24 37.50%22.50%
RIGHT ANGLE 0 5 6 11 45.45%12.50%
OUT OF CONTROL 0 4 5 9 44.44%10.00%
HEAD ON 0 4 2 6 66.67%10.00%
LEFT TURN 0 0 6 6 0.00%0.00%
PASSING 0 1 4 5 20.00%2.50%
DEER 0 1 2 3 33.33%2.50%
RIGHT TURN RIGHT ANGLE COLLISION 0 0 2 2 0.00%0.00%
OTHER 0 0 1 1 0.00%0.00%
AVOIDING 0 0 1 1 0.00%0.00%
RIGHT TURN 0 0 1 1 0.00%0.00%
Grand Total 2 40 76 116 34.48%100.00%
Page | 37
9. Truman Blvd and Hwy 50
The 9th and final area of concern is the area of Truman Blvd, US 50, and Country Club Dr. This complex of
intersections makes up just over 2% of all accidents in the CAMPO region. Around 20000 people a day use Truman Blvd
through these intersections. Some improvements have already been made to this area but more safety improvements
are needed. Any issue in this interchange not only blocks access too many large businesses in the area but it can also
back up traffic causing congestion on US 50. It is a known issue like all the other areas of concern, and like them does
show up on CAMPO’s Illustrative Projects list.
Page | 38
When we look at the numbers from the crashes we see 160 accidents over the 5 year period. Over half of the
accidents being rear end collisions. Another major concern is left turn accidents. With as much congestion in the area
as this road has it is not hard to figure out why there are as many left turn accidents as there are. Congestion makes it
difficult to turn across traffic. This area shows up as number 17 on CAMPO’s Illustrative Projects list. The project
proposes reconfiguring the interchange to address close outer road spacing, widening the westbound off-ramp to
improve capacity, and incorporate pedestrian facilities into the interchange. This project should help reduce the
congestion and the number of accidents in the area.
Type of Crash Serious Injuries All Injuries Damage Only Total Injury % of Type Injury % of Total
REAR END 21 68 89 23.60%51.22%
LEFT TURN 14 19 33 42.42%34.15%
RIGHT ANGLE 1 8 9 11.11%2.44%
LEFT TURN RIGHT ANGLE COLLISION 0 7 7 0.00%0.00%
PASSING 0 6 6 0.00%0.00%
HEAD ON 1 1 4 5 20.00%2.44%
RIGHT TURN RIGHT ANGLE COLLISION 1 4 5 20.00%2.44%
OUT OF CONTROL 1 2 1 3 66.67%4.88%
SIDESWIPE 1 1 2 50.00%2.44%
FIXED OBJECT 0 1 1 0.00%0.00%
Grand Total 2 41 119 160 25.63%100.00%
Page | 39
When we run an analysis of the area we can see that section of Truman Blvd has one of the highest accident
rates per foot of all roads in the area.
Page | 40
Summary
In conclusion we understand that accidents happen, but as members of CAMPO we have to look at areas and
ways to better create a safe travel environment for ourselves, our families, and everyone traveling through the CAMPO
region. While a zero death goal for all Missouri roads is important, it’s not enough to only focus on areas of fatalities. A
safer, accident free, road system requires us to broaden our definition of accident to all types and level of crashes when
analyzing the data for projects. Through geospatial analysis we have focused on 9 areas that make up 41% of all
accidents in the CAMPO region. With help from MoDOT and Jefferson City Public Works we can look into the proposed
projects to address these safety concerns that we brought up in this report. So the city, the state, and the region have a
long ways to go to make the roads safe but if we address what we can and work with MoDOT to reach the statewide
safety targets we could be a lot closer to having a safer road system.
Blank Page
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570
to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please
allow three business days to process the request.
CAMPO Technical Committee Staff Report
Federal Safety Performance Measures Update
January 2, 2020
Summary
Within the Fixing America's Surface Transportation (FAST) Act, the Federal Highway Administration
established 5 performance measures to assess performance and carry out the Highway Safety
Improvement Program: (1) number of fatalities, (2) rate of fatalities per VMT, (3) number of serious
injuries, (4) rate of serious injuries per VMT, and (5) number of combined non-motorized fatalities and
non-motorized serious injuries.
CAMPO must adopt safety targets, as outlined in the FAST Act, by February 27, 2020. MPOs may
choose between programing projects (1) in support of all the State targets, (2) establishing specific
numeric targets for all of the performance measures, or (3) establishing specific numeric targets for one or
more individual performance measures and supporting the State target on other performance measures.
Performance Measure
5-Year
Rolling
Average
(2014-2018)
5-year Rolling
Average Statewide
Target for CY2020
Number of Fatalities 886.8 859.3
Fatality Rate per 100 Million Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) 1.199 1.130
Number of Serious Injuries 4704.4 4505.4
Serious Injury Rate per 100 Million VMT 6.384 5.953
Number of Non-Motorized Fatalities and Serious Injuries 440.2 437.4
Targets based on 13% fatality reduction, 8% serious injury reduction, 1% VMT increase and 5%
non-motorized reduction
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends that CAMPO adopt the state targets, all of which are the targets established by
MoDOT. While the state safety targets are an important measure with respect to transportation planning,
there are no repercussions to the CAMPO area for failing to achieve safety targets.
Recommended Form of Motion:
Motion to forward the adoption of the safety targets established by MoDOT to the Board of Directors for
approval.
Agenda Item 6C
Blank Page
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570
to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please
allow three business days to process the request.
CAMPO Technical Committee Staff Report
Status of Current Work Tasks
January 2, 2019
Summary
The following list includes work tasks that are currently in progress or have been completed since the
previous Technical Committee meeting:
• Traffic Cash Analysis Report. Staff has a prepared report on crash statistics as they
relate to major intersections and thoroughfares that are currently included in the CAMPO
Illustrative List. See the attached report for more detail.
• Title VI Program update (including Public Participation Plan, Language Assistance
Plan). Recipients of Federal Transit Administration funding are federally required to
report certain general information to determine compliance with Title VI of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964. As a recipient, CAMPO is required to update the Title VI Program
every three years. See the attached staff report
• 2021-2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Staff has begun
development of the 2021-2025 TIP. See attached staff report.
• FY 2021 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) Development. Staff has begun
development of the FY 2021 UPWP. See attached staff report.
• Federal Performance Measures - Safety. Staff continues collaborating with MODOT
staff concerning various federal performance measures required by the FAST Act.
Please refer to staff report on the update of the federal safety performance targets and
how they were determined.
• Jefferson City Data Assistance. Staff is working with other Jefferson City planners in
providing data and mapping assistance in the update of the of the City’s Comprehensive
Plan.
• Major Thoroughfare Plan Development. Staff continues work on the Major
Thoroughfare Plan in conjunction with the development of the Jefferson City
Comprehensive Plan. The Major Thoroughfare Plan will be developed through
stakeholder input and will pull directly from the recently completed Travel Demand
Model.
Agenda Item 7A
Blank Page
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570
to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please
allow three business days to process the request.
CAMPO Technical Committee Staff Report
2021-2025 Transportation Improvement Program Update
January 2, 2020
Summary
The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a 5-year financial program of transportation projects
to be implemented within the Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA), which are funded by the Federal
Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), or are deemed ‘regionally
significant. The TIP is updated annually by CAMPO in cooperation with local jurisdictions, the Missouri
Department of Transportation, and local public transportation operators.
Development of the 2021-2025 TIP is starting.
We are making the 1st call for Federally Funded Transportation Projects and requesting budget
information supporting fiscal constraint. Please submit applications to CAMPO staff by 5:00pm on
Friday, February 21st, 2020.
The FY 2021-2025 TIP will be developed according to the schedule below:
Call for Projects Issued: January 2nd, 2020
Application Deadline: February 21st, 2020
Preliminary Review of TIP Draft March 5th, 2020
MoDOT/OneDOT TIP Draft review March 18th, 2020
TIP Draft Review, Open Public Comment April 15th, 2020
Final TIP Submitted for Approval May 7nd, 2020
Governor Approval of TIP June, 2020
Any questions or comments should be forwarded to Lee Bowden at 573-634-6525
or lbowden@jeffcitymo.org.
Agenda Item 7B
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization
2021 – 2025 New Project Application
1
Project Name: Click here to enter text.
Primary Project Sponsoring Organization: Click here to enter text.
Project Contact: Click here to enter text.
Sponsor Project Number: Click here to enter text.
Type of Project (check all that apply):
☐Airport/Aviation ☐Bicycle/Pedestrian ☐Bridge ☐Intersection
☐Plans/Studies ☐Roadway Expansion ☐Roadway Preservation ☐Railway
☐Safety ☐Transit ☐Other: Click here to enter text.
Project Description: Click here to enter text.
Project Location: Click here to enter text.
Project History: Click here to enter text.
Project Timeline, Cost and Funding Sources:
Project
Phase
Funding
Source
Funding
Agency
Agency Funding
Category
CAMPO Program Years (July 1-June30)
Prior
Years 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Funding
Source
Totals
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
Yearly Totals
Total Project Cost =
Source of operating / maintenance funding for 10 years after project is completed: Click here to enter text.
Provide evidence of public involvement: please include dates and information about public meetings and events held to
discuss the project (if applicable). Click here to enter text.
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization
2021 – 2025 New Project Application
2
Please demonstrate appropriate and safe accommodations made for all road users or appropriate reasons to exclude
this requirement for the proposed project. Click here to enter text.
Metropolitan Transportation Plan - Briefly describe how this project is consistent with the current Metropolitan
Transportation Plan. Click here to enter text.
Safety – How might this project help to reduce the number of serious injuries and fatalities for automobile and non-
motorized road users (if applicable)? Click here to enter text.
Additional Comments: Click here to enter text.
It is the responsibility of the agency submitting a project to ensure that Title VI, Environmental Justice, and Americans
with Disabilities Act regulations are being met for all projects . Please ensure that every effort to involve members of
all social, economic, and ethnic groups in the planning and design process have and will be undertaken.
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization
2021 – 2025 New Project Application
3
Project Name: Click here to enter text.
Primary Sponsor: Click here to enter text.
Street Address: Click here to enter text.
City, State, & Zip Code: Click here to enter text.
Phone: Click here to enter text.
Email: Click here to enter text.
Secondary Sponsor: Click here to enter text.
Street Address: Click here to enter text.
City, State, & Zip Code: Click here to enter text.
Phone : Click here to enter text.
Email: Click here to enter text.
To the best of my knowledge and belief, all information in this application is true and accurate, including the project
scope, associated cost estimates, and commitment of all physical and financial resources. The sponsor also certifies that
the governing body has approved the project, and sources of the matching funds have been identified and are
committed to completing the project within a reasonable timeframe.
Primary Sponsor Signature: ______________________________
Title: Click here to enter text.
Date: Click here to enter a date.
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570
to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please
allow three business days to process the request.
CAMPO Technical Committee Staff Report
FY2021 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
January 2, 2020
Summary
Staff has begun work on the FY2021 UPWP. This annual process starts very early due to the City of
Jefferson’s budget process. The FY2021 UPWP is anticipated to be adopted by May 2020.
The UPWP is CAMPO’s annual statement of work identifying the budget, planning priorities, and
activities to be carried out for the year (November 1to October 31). The UPWP contains many ongoing
activities required to perform the essential functions of CAMPO, as well as, periodic and one-time
activities. The UPWP serves as the basis for funding agreements with the Missouri Department of
Transportation (MoDOT).
The draft budget for FY2021 is approximately $182,674 with $146,139 (80%) funded through the
Consolidated Planning Grant and $36,535 (20%) funded through local match. The 20% local match is
provided by Jefferson City (75%) and Cole County (25%). Based on the anticapated FY2021
expenditure, it is projected that CAMPO will have a balance of $422,925 in unprgrammed CPG funds.
Staff is in the process of developing objectives and activities for FY2021. Input from the Technical
Committee, Board of Directors, stakeholders, and the general public will be used throughout the process.
These activities are categorized into five work elements:
• Work Element 1 - Program Support & Administration
• Work Element 2 - General Development and Comprehensive Planning Coordination
• Work Element 3 - Long Range Transportation Planning
• Work Element 4 - Short Range Transportation Planning & Programming
• Work Element 5 - Public Transportation Planning
Major activities in FY2021, developed thus far, include:
• Update of the Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan (Tri-Annual)
• Development of the FY2021 UPWP (Annual)
• Development of the 2021-2025 Transportation Improvement Program (Annual)
• Technical assisitance (i.e mapping, data development/management, grants) (Continuous)
Staff will continue to develop other activities through May of 2020 and any input is welcome.
Please refer questions or comments to Katrina Williams at 573-634-6536 or by email at
kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org.
Agenda Item 7C
CPG Balance for end of FY2019 $412,458
FY 2020 CPG Allocation* $150,074 Estimate
FY 2020 CPG Expenditure - Anticipated* -($143,542)Esitmate
Subtotal $418,990
$0
FY 2021 CPG Allocation - Estimated per MoDOT's SPR Work Program $150,074 Not verified as of 12/23/2019
FY 2021 CPG Programmed Expenditure -($146,139)Estimate
Remaining Unprogrammed CPG Funds Anticipated at end of FY 2021 $422,925
Consolidated Planning Grant Balance