Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout10/17/2017 City Council Minutes" MEDINA CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 17, 2017 The City Council of Medina, Minnesota met in regular session on October 17, 2017 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Chambers. Mayor Mitchell presided. I. ROLL CALL Members present: Anderson, Cousineau, Pederson, Martin, and Mitchell. Members absent: None. Also present: City Administrator Scott Johnson, City Attorney Andrew Biggerstaff, City Engineer Jim Stremel, City Planner Dusty Finke, Public Works Director Steve Scherer, and Chief of Police Ed Be!land. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (7:00 p.m.) III. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA (7:00 p.m.) The agenda was approved as presented. IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (7:00 p.m.) A. Approval of the October 3, 2017 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes Mitchell noted that Martin submitted written corrections. It was noted on page four, line 32, it should state, "He stated that, globally, he would alse want the solar equipment for residential projects to remain for residential use consumption." Moved by Cousineau, seconded by Anderson, to approve the October 3, 2017 regular City Council meeting minutes as amended. Motion passed unanimously. B. Approval of the October 11, 2017 Special City Council Meeting Minutes Moved by Anderson, seconded by Pederson, to approve the October 11, 2017 special City Council meeting minutes as presented. Motion passed unanimously. V. CONSENT AGENDA (7:03 p.m.) A. Resolution No. 2017-80 Certifying Delinquent Storm Water Utility Charges to the Hennepin County Auditor for Collection in 2018 B. Resolution No. 2017-81 Certifying Delinquent Utility Charges to the Hennepin County Auditor for Collection in 2018 C. Resolution No. 2017-82 Certifying Delinquent City Charges for Services to the Hennepin County Auditor for Collection in 2018 D. Resolution No. 2017-83 Accepting Public Utilities Within the AutoMotorPlex Development L F. Resolution No. 2017-84 Authorizing Publication of the CD-PUD "School Lake Nature Preserve" Ordinance No. 618 by Title and Summary Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 1 October 17, 2017 Preserve H. Ordinance No. 619 Regarding Solar Equipment; Amending Chapter 8 of the City Code I. Resolution No. 2017-86 Authorizing Publication of Solar Equipment Ordinance No. 619 by Title and Summary J. Resolution No. 2017-87 Granting Conditional Use Permit Approval to JEGM Revocable Trust for Accessory Structures in Excess of 5,000 Square Feet at 2705 Willow Drive K. Resolution No. 2017-88 Granting Conditional Use Permit Approval to JEGM Revocable Trust for Installation of Solar Equipment at 2705 Willow Drive Mitchell noted that he is opposed to items E and G and therefore would like those items pulled from the Consent Agenda in order to vote separately. Moved by Pederson, seconded by Anderson, to approve the consent agenda. Motion passed unanimously. E. Ordinance No. 618 Establishing a Conservation Design -Planned Unit Development District for "School Lake Nature Preserve" and Amending the Official Zoning Map Mitchell stated that he feels that the property could be developed adequately under the current zoning and is therefore concerned with the doubling of the density. Moved by Cousineau, seconded by Anderson, to adopt Ordinance No. 618 establishing a Conservation Design -Planned Unit Development District for "School Lake Nature Preserve" and amending the official zoning map. Motion passed 4-1 (Mitchell opposed). G. Resolution No. 2017-85 Granting Preliminary Approval of a Plat and Granting Approval of a PUD General Plan of Development for a Conservation Design Subdivision to be Known as School Lake Nature Preserve Moved by Cousineau, seconded by Martin, to adopt Resolution No. 2017-85 granting preliminary approval of a Plat and granting approval of a PUD General Plan of Development for a Conservation Design Subdivision to be known as School Lake Nature Preserve. Motion passed 4-1 (Mitchell opposed). VI. COMMENTS (7:07 p.m.) A. Comments from Citizens on Items not on the Agenda There were none. B. Park Commission Scherer stated that the October meeting has been canceled and therefore he had nothing further to report. C. Planning Commission Planning Commissioner Murrin reported that the Commission met the previous week to consider an application from Mark of Excellence Homes. She stated that the • Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 2 October 17, 2017 " Commission reviewed the two applications that the Council will review as tonight as two separate requests during the September and October meetings. She stated that the Planning Commission did not feel that the applicant would meet the requirements for the jump ahead. She noted that the Commission discussed the benefit of the applicant contributing to the watermain and the construction of the Chippewa Road extension but then weighed those benefits against the additional residential growth that the applicant is requesting. She stated that if the parcel that requires rezoning was rezoned to residential, from business, the staging should then be delayed to 2025. She stated that the Commission did not recommend approval of the Comprehensive Plan amendment and instead requested that the Steering Committee review the southern parcel to determine if business would be the best designation for the parcel. She stated that the Commission also discussed the ordinance for the landfill zoning, noting that the discussion was continued for three consecutive meetings. She noted that a representative from the PCA was present at the meeting to provide additional input on the methane gas and groundwater areas of concern. She stated that the Commission recommended approval of the ordinance as proposed without the setback with a vote of 3-2. She stated that the Commission recommended unanimous approval of the rezoning of the landfill to the closed landfill/restricted designation. Martin referenced the Chippewa Road extension and asked for more information on the discussion of the need. Murrin noted that the bigger issue was about the desire to maintain greenspace. She stated that there was discussion on which residents would use the road and who would absorb the cost for construction. She stated that the consensus was that the road should be built in the future when it is needed. VII. PRESENTATIONS A. Wayzata Public Schools  Special Election Questions (7:14 p.m.) Jim Westrum, Wayzata Public Schools, stated that on November 7th there is an election for the School District. He noted that the election will have three candidates for open positions on the School Board and will also include three questions regarding an operating levy, construction referendum, and technology levy. He stated that School Districts are required to seek voter approval and have a ten-year lifespan, noting that the operating and technology levies were last approved in 2009 and therefore this approval is being requested prior to the expiration of those levies. He stated that the bond referendum is requested for the construction of a standalone building and other construction projects which also require voter approval. He played a short video that explains the need for the additional funds. Pederson asked where the new elementary school would be constructed. Westrum replied that the School District acquired property north of Hwy 55 near 101 in Plymouth, noting that a small sliver of the parcel is located in Medina. Mitchell stated that he is interested in the operating levy comparison and may contact Westrum to gain additional input. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 3 October 17, 2017 Westrum stated that each School District receives the same amount per student from the State and the operating levies help to make the difference that the schools need to operate. Mitchell stated that he has been impressed by the reputation of the Wayzata School District in the past 50 years, noting that there were problems prior to that and acknowledged that the school worked hard to repair that reputation. Pederson stated that there seems to be different rumors that the Wayzata School District cannot handle more students and asked for the response of the School District. Westrum stated that in 2014 the School District received approval from the voters to expand the high school and build a new elementary school in 2014 and provided statistics on the number of students that the different school levels can handle. He stated that there is adequate space at the secondary level but they would have challenges meeting the projections if the referendum in November is not approved. He stated that the School District also reviews the Comprehensive Plans of the cities and uses those projections for planning. He stated that they appreciate the slowed growth approach that Medina has taken which will help to level off the growth until the time the School District attendance also slows and decreases. VIII. NEW BUSINESS A. Mark of Excellence Homes — Weston Woods — Planned Unit Development Concept Plan Review —1952 Chippewa Road (7:26 p.m.) Johnson noted that items A and B are related to each other. Pederson noted that he will be recusing himself because of a recommendation from the City Attorney. He stated that he does not believe he has a conflict of interest but would follow the recommendation of the City Attorney and recused himself. Mitchell asked the reason for the believed conflict of interest. Biggerstaff replied that Pederson owns property near the proposed development site and has made comments publicly regarding the proposed development which would lead a person to believe there is a relationship between the two. Mitchell stated that he is very much opposed to this conflict of interest. He stated that Pederson owns property north of the northern development. He acknowledged that Pederson attended the Planning Commission meeting and made general comments. He stated that he would support the recommendation of the City Attorney but urged counsel to dig deeper on their recommendations in the future. Biggerstaff replied that the perceived conflict is the common law conflict for non - monetary issues. Pederson noted that at the Planning Commission meeting he made the comment that he would not want surface water shed onto his property from the subject property. He noted that the developer made the comment regarding the density, and perhaps Batty was confused about that. • Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 4 October 17, 2017 " Finke stated that there are two separate applications and reports for developments from the same developer. He stated that this item is a PUD concept review for a 94-unit twinhome development. He stated that the second request is for the parcel to the south and includes 48 lots. He stated that the subject property for this request is guided for low density residential and is available for development in the 2016 staging period. He stated that the draft Comprehensive Plan also guides the property as low density residential development but delays development until the 2025 staging period. He stated that the applicant proposes the PUD to allow for the twinhome construction, noting that there is not a zoning district in the City that would allow for twinhomes at this low of a density. He noted that the draft Comprehensive Plan allows for twinhomes within the low density residential land use. He displayed the subject site and reviewed the adjacent land uses including the Wealshire project, Polaris, Bridgewater, and rural residential property. He displayed the concept plan with the 94 twinhomes that would access from Mohawk Drive. He reviewed the criteria that are used to determine if a request would meet the objectives of a PUD. He stated that the draft Comprehensive Plan proposed a change for the property, noting that the draft plan will be effective early in 2018 and therefore the Council should consider the direction the draft plan provides in order not to disrupt the planning process. He noted that the City can enact a moratorium if that is deemed necessary to protect the planning process. He stated that the visions, goals, and land use chapters of the existing and draft Comprehensive Plan were included for the Council to review. He stated that the property is guided similarly in both versions of the plan but the timing would be different as the draft plan delays development until 2025, while the property has been available for development under the existing plan for the past decade. He noted that the standards are a bit different for twinhomes and advised that information was included in the Council packet. He stated that the wetland delineation is pending and there are not a lot of treed areas on the site. He stated that there are a number of infrastructure improvements planned for this area in the draft Comprehensive Plan. He stated that all access would be provided from Mohawk Drive and discussed concerns with transportation in this area and the need for the Chippewa Road extension. He stated that the City has identified a need to loop the watermain between Mohawk and Arrowhead Drive. He stated that this site is in an important location to provide the infrastructure improvements. He noted that the applicant proposed to provide a watermain loop in this area as part of the application. He stated that the Park Commission has identified a need for a park in this area and noted that if the twinhome development moves forward it would be a lowered priority for site selection for a park. He stated that the City has a great deal of discretion when reviewing a PUD request. He stated that the Planning Commission held a public hearing and did not find that this proposal met the criteria for a PUD and therefore did not provide supportive comments for the project to move forward as a PUD. He stated that the Commission recommended that the density be lowered closer to two units per acre which would follow the R-1 district. Martin asked for the PUD criteria to be posted. Finke displayed the criteria. Mitchell suggested that Finke move on to the second presentation. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 5 October 17, 2017 Anderson asked if Pederson could then rejoin the discussion for the second presentation. Biggerstaff stated that perhaps the Council should finish the discussion on the first item and then Pederson could rejoin the Council for the discussion of the second item. Martin stated that it makes sense to follow the advice of legal counsel and finish the discussion of this item before Pederson returns to the Council to hear the second presentation. Kate Nore, 4412 Bluebell Trail South, stated that her family moved to Medina one year ago and the main reason for that move was to enjoy the greenspace. She stated that her family prefers the greenspace over the ability to drive to Target faster. She stated that the updated growth plans were developed for the Comprehensive Plan and asked that the Council follow those plans rather than bending to allow another development. She referenced traffic and infrastructure, noting that additional traffic would use Arrowhead to access Highway 55. She stated that with other infrastructure investments and projects already planned, she was unsure that allowing this development would align with those timelines and noted that allowing this development might also open that door for other requests. Chris Hillberg stated that he shares the concerns with additional traffic that would be using Arrowhead, noting the number of accidents on that roadway. He stated that Arrowhead was not designed for the level of traffic that it currently handles. He urged the City to consider the Bridgewater development plans which specifically addresses the safety concerns with Arrowhead. He stated that they do not want to be the next CR 116, and believes that would happen to Arrowhead if this additional development was allowed. He stated that cars speed along Meander which provide additional safety concerns. He referenced the proposed development and urged the Council to follow the recommendation of the Planning Commission. He stated that Medina has a strong interest in slowing growth, noting that many elected officials were elected on the platform of slowing growth and urged the Council to follow the plan to delay development of this site until 2025. He asked that the Council follow what the voters have been asking for in terms of slowing growth and follow the draft Comprehensive Plan staging. Martin asked how the Council would review a request that is in the current staging period of the existing Comprehensive Plan but delayed in the draft Comprehensive Plan. She noted that this is a PUD request and therefore the request would have to meet those criteria but asked for general input if this were a typical residential development. Biggerstaff explained that because this is a PUD the Council has the broadest range of discretion. He stated that if the Council received an application for a permitted or allowable use, the discretion would be more curbed and the Council would have to apply the current code. He stated that the PUD is a special tool that allows the Council to sidestep the traditional zoning related items to allow for a more innovative development. Martin stated that a lot of attention has been paid to future land use. She stated that she chaired the Steering Committee and is familiar with the desire to slow residential growth. She stated that the focus tonight is on whether a PUD is appropriate for this site considering what the applicant is proposing. She clarified that the question tonight would be whether this request meets the criteria for a PUD. • Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 6 October 17, 2017 " Cousineau asked under which Comprehensive Plan the Council should review this request. Martin noted that if the request does not meet the standards for a PUD, the Council would then not have to determine which version of the plan to review the request. She stated that she does not believe that the request would meet the PUD criteria. Cousineau agreed that she does not believe the request meets the PUD criteria. Mitchell stated that if this is a PUD, it would be a stretch to say this meets the criteria. Martin noted that if a PUD is not appropriate, then the discussion would not even need to continue. Anderson agreed that he also struggles to see how this would fit as a PUD. Mitchell asked what would occur if the applicant were to bring this request back as a regular residential development without a PUD. Finke stated that it would determine when the request is received and the timing of review. He noted that the City is anticipating a submission to the Metropolitan Council in November, which would then provide the Met Council with 120 days to review. He noted that the City would then need to provide a plan to make the draft plan effective, which could take four months. Johnson clarified that if the review were to come back under the draft plan, although the site would remain residential, the staging would be delayed until 2025. Mitchell stated that it seems that the City has seen a number of these development requests that have a timing issue because of the Comprehensive Plan process. He stated that the request would not meet the PUD criteria and if the plan is changed, the timing would then not work because of the change in staging that will occur under the draft Comprehensive Plan. Martin stated that when she looks at the standards for approving a PUD, she does not see that this development would achieve anything above what would be achieved under normal development. She stated that she is not seeing innovative stormwater management or preservation of open space. She did not feel that this development would meet the vision of the draft Comprehensive Plan as this would call for single- family homes. Cousineau stated that this product is a 28-year-old product and therefore is not an innovative product either. Anderson asked if the Council owes the applicant a review of the second proposal and confirmed the consensus of the Council to review the second proposal. Finke stated that perhaps the applicant would like the opportunity to speak. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 7 October 17, 2017 Mark Smith, applicant, stated that the main reason they chose the PUD is that twinhomes did not quite fit the zoning code. He stated that the site is 40 acres with a density that would almost meet the density of single-family homes. He stated that he does believe that the site meets some of the PUD criteria, noting that he was not aware that he would need to meet all nine criteria. He stated that one association would be used which means that lawncare and snow removal would be done by one company and not each homeowner doing lawncare on different days. He stated that if both projects were approved he would be able to provide the watermain loop and the extension of Chippewa Road. He stated that there is also a park proposed for the south portion and trails would also be provided that would allow neighboring developments to walk through the development and utilize the park. He stated that he has found success with twinhomes, which allows more space between the units than typical townhomes. B. Mark of Excellence Homes — Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Planned Unit Development Concept Plan — East of Mohawk Drive and North of Highway 55 (8:05 p.m.) Pederson rejoined the Council. Finke stated that the applicant has requested an amendment to the current Comprehensive Plan to change the designation from mixed -use to low density residential. He stated that the applicant also submitted a PUD concept plan for a 48-lot single-family residential development with a seven -acre park. He stated that the property is currently zoned mixed -use and the draft plan identifies a change in designation to business. He stated that the PUD allows for a smaller single-family product that would have narrower lots that still meet the minimum lot size. He stated that the PUD would allow for the narrow lots that would accommodate the seven -acre park site. He displayed both the previous concept and this concept together with the seven -acre park site. He stated that the park would be a relatively flat, active park. He stated that the Planning Commission expressed concern with the level of tree removal, but the applicant replied that they would be open to leaving the treed area if the City desires, which would shrink the active portion of the park. He stated that the applicant has applied for an amendment to the current Comprehensive Plan to change the land use from mixed -use to low density residential. He explained that mixed -use would include a portion of residential and some other use, noting that the residential property would have a higher ratio of density. He stated that he is not sure how the Metropolitan Council would respond to a request to lower the density of the current Comprehensive Plan, especially because the density that has already occurred in the past ten years has been lower density. He stated that the property is staged for development today and would remain in that staging under the draft plan, but would be guided for business under the draft plan. He stated that the density range would fall below the proposed density for the existing Comprehensive Plan. He noted that the Council should first consider the Comprehensive Plan amendment and then consider the PUD concept. He provided information on the proposed development, which would have a density ratio of 2.2 units per acre. He stated that there is a wooded area to the west of the large wetland, noting that the concept would call for the removal of the wooded area and would then call for substantial tree replacement. He stated that the applicant has stated that they would be open to leaving the higher quality wooded area in place in conjunction with the park property in return for park dedication credit. He stated that if both proposals are approved the applicant would fund the extension of the Chippewa Road and the watermain connection. He stated that the Park Commission reviewed this request and did support having an active park in this area. He stated that the Park • Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 8 October 17, 2017 " Commission saw this as an opportunity to preserve the wooded area on this site and then take two smaller neighborhood parks in nearby developments. He stated that the City has the greatest level of discretion when considering a Comprehensive Plan Amendment and a great amount of discretion when considering a PUD request, which would be subsequent should the Council agree with the Comprehensive Plan amendment. He stated that staff does have concern with submitting a Comprehensive Plan amendment while the draft plan is under review. He stated that if the City agrees with the amendment, staff would suggest amending the draft plan rather than amending the existing plan. He stated that the Planning Commission held a public hearing of the Comprehensive Plan amendment the previous week and unanimously recommended denial of the request. He stated that the Commission recommended that the Steering Committee review the parcel as part of their wrap up to determine if the business designation would be the best fit for the parcel. He noted that the Steering Committee is scheduled to meet on October 26th Martin asked for the location of the commercial property on the southern five acres of the site. Finke identified the property lines, identifying the commercial property, and noting that the remainder of the site is mixed -use. Martin stated that the site is primarily guided for mixed -use and asked the ratio that is supposed to be non-residential. Finke stated that there is not a ratio for non-residential. He explained that at least 50 percent of the net property is required to be residential while there is not a requirement for a minimum of the other type of development, nor what that development should be other than non-residential. He stated that there is less buildable property east of the wetland. He noted that the park property would complicate the math as well. Anderson asked if the applicant is proposing to fund the entire cost of the Chippewa Road extension less the wetland mitigation. Finke stated that the applicant would look for the City to handle the permitting and to handle the wetland mitigation if that is required through financial means. He stated that the applicant would fund the street portion and not the trail portion of the roadway project. Bill Griffith, land use attorney representing the applicant, stated that there are a lot of moving parts with the Comprehensive Plan, zoning, and PUD and therefore it becomes a timing of development question. He stated that it would come down to whether there is an issue with the timing of development that prevents this from moving forward or whether the City views the infrastructure as a benefit and would want to see this move forward in some form. He noted that the infrastructure improvements (the road extension and watermain) and park would provide public benefits. He noted that the details can be worked out in the process but the big question is whether the Council would like to consider the current timeframe to work in partnership to secure this critical infrastructure. He stated that they can pack their bags and move on or they can continue to work with the City to provide these critical infrastructure improvements. He hoped that his comments helped to provide clarity as they would like to work with the City to provide those infrastructure improvements. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 9 October 17, 2017 Martin stated that the improvements are valuable improvements and asked if the developer's commitment to those improvements would be dependent on both the north and south developments. Griffith replied that the commitments would be dependent on both developments because you cannot do the road without projects on the north and south. He stated that you would also need the development density to make the proforma work. He stated that what that development looks like ultimately can be worked out but noted that the north and south would be essential. Tim Cavanaugh, current owner of the southern property, stated that they have come before the Council with other proposals and there have been issues. He stated that the City wants lower density and that is what is being proposed. He stated that he has paid for sewer that has not been utilized. He stated that he is paying a premium in property taxes and believes that this is the highest and best use given the topography. He stated that the land is not well suited for business because it is not contiguous and because of the wetlands and creek. He noted that while those elements would be assets in a residential development, they would be challenges for a business development. He stated that this proposal attempts to preserve trees, provide park land, and provide low - density housing that would be an asset to the community. Mitchell stated that there is an issue with timing and the different Comprehensive Plan and the current designation of mixed -use and proposed designation of business. Anderson stated that the Steering Committee did discuss this parcel. He stated that he feels quite strongly that the Council needs to adopt an attitude and spirit of the draft Comprehensive Plan and would be reluctant to amend the current plan. He stated that to amend the current plan, the Metropolitan Council would not look favorably because of the lower density requested. Martin stated that the City was not asked by the Metropolitan Council to add significant residential development to the City and the City has an opportunity to keep the residential development low. She stated that the thinking of this property was for a business campus, that would not clog the residential use of Highway 55 and adjacent intersections, as business traffic would not interfere with the direction of residential traffic during peak times. Cousineau stated that it would be hard to make a significant switch to the designation for the property when the Steering Committee worked so hard for the past 18 months. Martin stated that it would be very awkward to request to amend the current plan in a manner contrary to the draft plan that is currently being reviewed. She stated that it would make the City look disjointed, confused, and minimize the ability to sell the draft plan currently being reviewed by the Metropolitan Council. Anderson noted that it would also be grossly unfair to allow this request when the Council has denied the past three or four requests to amend the Comprehensive Plan this past year. • Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 10 October 17, 2017 " " " Mitchell stated that there were residential developments planned for this property in the past that did not come to fruition. He stated that this request would help with the infrastructure, noting that if you have both sides of the road you can build the road. He stated that he could imagine a way to work this out. Cousineau stated that not everyone necessarily wants this type of development to occur, noting that the residents are not disappointed that the previous residential development did not work. She stated that the Steering Committee mapped out the development in pieces with staging and we speak for them. Representation is our obligation. Martin agreed that the Steering Committee ensured endeavored to stage development so that there would not be a lot of development coming on at one time. Anderson agreed that they reviewed the staging three times to ensure that everything would work smoothly. Finke stated that this property is staged for imminent development in both versions of the plan, while the northern property is in delayed staging. He stated that this parcel is a land use question and not a timing question. Mitchell asked if the business use would prohibit or hurt this application. Finke replied that the draft plan identifies this parcel for business use. He identified examples of mixed -use development that has moved forward with only the residential component. Martin stated that she struggles with the business portion of this development. Pederson stated that he walked the property and does not believe that this would be suitable for business. He noted that most businesses would need an access from the highway and this parcel would only have right-in/right-out access. He stated that the City would get a park and a road that is needed for public safety. He stated that the City also needs the watermain and believes that the City needs to work it out. He stated that he does not like the product but believes that this needs a second look. He stated that this will be developed eventually and if the City can work out the timelines for the project, it would help. He stated that he does not want to look in the future at a $4,000,000 bond for the road. He noted that the City would also get the park in addition to the infrastructure. Cousineau stated that she also had concern "looking the gift horse in the mouth" but noted that if regional planning is supposed to have a purpose she would have difficulty forgoing that. Pederson stated that the Council is stewards of public funds and this is a great opportunity. Martin commented that the previous residential developer was not willing to do the entire road. Mitchell asked the posture of the application and what the Council should do tonight. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 11 October 17, 2017 Johnson stated that no action is required tonight other than the Comprehensive Plan amendment. Finke explained that the formal request is to change the future land use in the current Comprehensive Plan. Griffiths stated that they are willing to continue the application to provide additional time. He stated that they prefer to work with the City. He stated that if they can fit the development more into the existing zoning requirements, they would be willing to look at that. He asked that this be continued, noting that they can extend timelines as nothing says this has to be done tonight. He stated that the real offer is to take the comments tonight and work with City staff to see if they can work it out. Mitchell stated that if the applicant had a mixed -use component the discussion would then be over. Finke stated that the density range would also need to be met which would be difficult with the proposed density. Mitchell suggested that the developer come to the October 26th Steering Committee meeting, or submit a letter. Martin noted that would not be an appropriate forum for the developer to make a pitch. Mitchell stated that there are serious issues that need to be resolved. Martin noted that the intent of the October 26th meeting is to address specific comments the Metropolitan Council provided for the draft plan. Mitchell noted that this is an interesting plan that needs to be considered. Martin noted that would not be for the Steering Committee to consider. Johnson noted that the item could be tabled but noted that if there is no interest in the Comprehensive Plan amendment, action could occur that tonight. Mitchell noted that if the request is tabled, the applicant could then come back with mixed -use and would not need the amendment. Cousineau stated that the issue appears to be whether business would be the appropriate use. Mitchell stated that he would prefer to table this to determine if a compromise can be worked out. Johnson asked if an extension would be needed. Finke stated that there is sufficient time at this point but noted that the Council could request and extension if needed. • • Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 12 October 17, 2017 " Griffith confirmed that there is time left for review but noted that they would provide an extension as well. Moved by Pederson, seconded by Anderson, to table the request. Motion passed unanimously. IX. CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT (8:52 p.m.) Johnson stated that the November 7th meeting has been moved to November 8th because of the School District elections. He noted that on November 21st, two Councilmembers will not be able to attend and received permission to reschedule the Council Meeting to November 16th Pederson noted that he still would not be able to attend on the 16th but confirmed that he would be okay with the Council changing the date. Johnson stated that he would then put the request on the Consent Agenda for the next meeting to change the meeting date from November 21st to November 16th. X. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS (8:54 p.m.) Anderson thanked staff for coordinating the business tours, noting that he continues to be struck by the high quality of businesses that the City has in the community. Pederson agreed and believed that the businesses appreciate that the Council is willing to go out and visit them. He stated that he attended the Hamel Fire open house and found it to be an excellent demonstration that they completed with battery operated tools to cut open a vehicle. He stated that the City is lucky to have the fire departments that they have. Martin stated that if you do not have the back of the volunteers, there is nothing that motivates them. She used the example of Sonoma, California, in which the volunteers went out to fight the fire by hand with axes. She stated that you do not get that motivation from volunteers without the support of the community. Xl. APPROVAL TO PAY THE BILLS (8:57 p.m.) Moved by Anderson, seconded by Pederson, to approve the bills, EFT 004333E- 004349E for $47,853.30, order check numbers 046417-046496 for $272,409.28, and payroll EFT 508190-508220 for $48,741.58. Motion passed unanimously. XII. ADJOURN Moved by Anderson, seconded by Pederson, to adjourn the meeting at 8:58 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. Bob Mitchell, Mayor Attest: Jodi M. allup, City Clerk Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 13 October 17, 2017 " This Page Intentionally Left Blank Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 14 October 17, 2017 ORDER CHECKS OCTOBER 1 2017 - OCTOBER 17, 2017 046417 ADAM'S PEST CONTROL INC $79.50 046418 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSN - MN $270.00 046419 DAVID WEEKLEY HOMES $5,000.00 046420 KAKANAVARAM, ANIRUDH $150.00 046421 MUNJULURI, HARISH $250.00 046422 NAPA OF CORCORAN INC $37.78 046423 RESERVE OF MEDINA HOA $250.00 046424 SCOTT, KEVIN $500.00 046425 WILLIAM SKREI $50.00 046426 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL $617.40 046427 VINCK, JOHN $107.82 046428 CUSTOM HOME BUILDERS $609.75 046429 ELLINGSON, GREG & PAM $500.00 046430 JORGES, JENNY $500.00 046431 KHAN, NIGHAT $225.00 046432 US HOME CORP $10,000.00 046433 WAGNER, JOHN/LISA $95.67 046434 ALLSTAR ELECTRIC $93.00 046435 ASPEN MILLS INC $2,116.53 046436 ASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC $30.00 046437 BATTERIES + BULBS $321.68 046438 BEAUDRY OIL & PROPANE $2,107.65 046439 BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MN $29,057.20 046440 BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC $12.55 046441 BROCK WHITE $469.36 046442 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS $6,502.36 046443 BUDGET PRINTING $12.81 046444 BURDAS TOWING $350.00 046445 BURSCHVILLE CONSTRUCTION INC $11,150.00 046446 CAREFREE SERVICES INC $6,014.26 046447 CENTERPOINT ENERGY $200.55 046448 CENTURYLINK $225.21 046449 CONTEMPORARY IMAGES $2,117.94 046450 CORE & MAIN LP $5,695.34 046451 DATAWORKS PLUS LLC $1,540.33 046452 DESIGNING NATURE, INC. $2,251.50 046453 DPC INDUSTRIES INC $2,034.84 046454 ECM PUBLISHERS INC $118.73 046455 ENVIRONMENTAL WOOD SUPPLY LLC $1,000.00 046456 GALLS/QUARTERMASTER $56.00 046457 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL $317.25 046458 GRAINGER $248.01 046459 HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOCIATES I $500.00 046460 HAMEL LUMBER INC $450.09 046461 HAMEL LIONS CLUB $1,675.00 046462 HAMEL VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT $73,500.00 046463 HENN COUNTY INFO TECH $955.20 046464 HENN CTY RESIDENT/REAL ESTATE $54.50 046465 HENRYS WATERWORKS INC $3,599.62 046466 HOLIDAY FLEET $184.33 046467 KD & COMPANY RECYCLING INC $167.44 046468 KENNEDY & GRAVEN CHARTERED $1,881.75 046469 LANO EQUIPMENT INC $113.43 046470 LEXISNEXIS RISK DATA MGMT INC $48.00 046471 LORETTO VOL FIRE DEPT INC $25,199.96 046472 CITY OF MAPLE PLAIN $1,771.28 046473 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL $9,840.60 046474 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL $25,399.93 046475 METRO ELEVATOR INC $180.00 046476 METRO WEST INSPECTION $5,683.56 046477 MINNESOTA OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH $401.00 046478 MN DEPT OF LABOR/INDUSTRY $6,072.31 046479 MOTLEY AUTO SERVICE LLC $534.00 046480 NAPA OF CORCORAN INC $49.57 046481 NORTHWEST ASSOC CONSULTANTS $2,048.13 046482 OFFICE DEPOT $108.72 046483 CITY OF ORONO $3,249.17 046484 READY WATT ELECTRIC $198.00 046485 RECYCLING ASSOCIATION OF MN $300.00 046486 RES SPECIALTY PYROTECHNICS $4,000.00 046487 JAMIE R WIOME $5,533.40 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 15 October 17, 2017 046488 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC $57.47 046489 STREICHER'S $100.98 046490 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC $594.20 046491 TALLEN & BAERTSCHI $3,862.99 046492 TIMESAVER OFFSITE $398.00 046493 TRI-COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT $75.00 046494 WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE $162.00 046495 XTREME MOBILE SMALL ENGINE $108.50 046496 ZIEGLER INC $65.13 Total Checks $272,409.28 ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS OCTOBER 3, 2017 — OCTOBER 17, 2017 004333E PR PERA $14,544.16 004334E PR FED/FICA $16,499.47 004335E PR MN Deferred Comp $2,320.00 004336E PR STATE OF MINNESOTA $3,417.64 004337E SELECT ACCOUNT $1,496.07 004338E CITY OF MEDINA $20.00 004339E PREMIUM WATERS INC $38.75 004340E SELECT ACCOUNT $1,270.30 004341E FARMERS STATE BANK OF HAMEL $125.00 004342E CIPHER LABORATORIES INC. $4,772.32 004343E MEDIACOM OF MN LLC $204.67 004344E PITNEY BOWES POSTAGE BY PHONE $1,000.00 004345E PAYMENT SERVICE NETWORK INC $652.98 004346E VALVOLINE FLEET SERVICES $113.97 004347E FRONTIER $56.75 004348E VERIZON WIRELESS $1,261.38 004349E PREMIUM WATERS INC $59.84 Total Electronic Checks $47,853.30 PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSIT OCTOBER 4, 2017 508190 ALTENDORF, JENNIFER L $1,332.97 508191 ANDERSON, JOHN G $230.87 508192 BARNHART, ERIN A. $2,233.73 508193 BELLAND, EDGAR J $2,570.17 508194 BOECKER, KEVIN D. $2,162.81 508195 CONVERSE, KEITH A $2,269.40 508196 COUSINEAU, LORIE K. $230.87 508197 DINGMANN, IVAN W $1,608.40 508198 ENDE, JOSEPH $1,620.68 508199 FINKE, DUSTIN D. $2,178.54 508200 GALLUP, JODI M $1,752.05 508201 GLEASON, JOHN M. $1,779.60 508202 GREGORY, THOMAS $2,035.79 508203 HALL, DAVID M. $2,216.48 508204 JESSEN, JEREMIAH S $2,001.80 508205 JOHNSON, SCOTT T. $2,230.19 508206 KIESER, NICHOLAS $635.97 508207 KLAERS, ANNE M $1,154.58 508208 LANE, LINDA $1,492.96 508209 LEUER, GREGORY J. $1,905.51 508210 MARTIN, KATHLEEN M $230.87 508211 MCGILL, CHRISTOPHER R $1,757.23 508212 MCKINLEY, JOSHUA D $1,665.18 508213 MITCHELL, ROBERT G. $327.07 508214 NELSON, JASON $2,357.37 508215 PEDERSON, JEFF $221.92 508216 PETERSON, DEBRA A $1,684.68 508217 REINKING, DEREK M $1,767.53 508218 SCHARF, ANDREW $1,650.12 508219 SCHERER, STEVEN T. $2,289.29 508220 VIEAU, CECILIA M. $1,146.95 Total Payroll Direct Deposit $48,741.58 Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 16 October 17, 2017