Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout10/18/05 CCM319 MEDINA CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF OCTOBER 18, 2005 The City Council of Medina, Minnesota met in regular session on October 18, 2005 at 7:01 p.m. in the Hamel Community Building. Mayor Workman presided. I. ROLL CALL Members present: Brinkman, Cavanaugh, Smith, Weir, and Workman. Members absent: None. Also present: City Attorney Ron Batty, City Engineer Tom Kellogg, Public Works Director Jim Dil!man, Police Chief Ed Belland, City Planner Rose Lorsung, City Planner Consultant Sarah Schield, City Administrator Chad Adams and Recording Secretary Cheryl Felix. I. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA None. III. APPROVAL A. Approval of the October 4, 2005 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes It was noted on page 4, the 13th paragraph, it should state: "Weir ...requires an innovative...." It was noted on page 5, the 2nd paragraph, it should state: Cavanaugh stated GonsieleFing including...." It was noted on page 5, the 2"d paragraph, it should state: "He added the enty most significant criteria consistently used, among others,..." It was noted on page 11, the 14th paragraph, it should state: "Cavanaugh Brinkman...." Moved by Weir, seconded by Smith, to approve the October 4, 2005 regular City Council meeting minutes as amended. Motion passed unanimously. IV. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approve Job Description for Office Receptionist Position and Authorize Staff to Post an Advertisement for Hiring B. Schedule December 6 and December 20 City Council Meetings at Hamel Community Building, 3200 Mill Drive, 7:00 p.m. Moved by Smith, seconded by Weir, to approve the consent agenda. Motion passed unanimously. VI. COMMENTS Medina City Council Meeting Minutes October 18, 2005 320 A. Comments from Citizens on Items not on the Agenda Chris Sundin, 1525 Hackamore Road, stated the Council is aware there is a water line being installed underground on Hackamore Road for the Cudd development. This line runs through their property; however, the City has no authority or permission to do this, although they are trying to use statutory user authority. City staff has been unavailable to return calls so an attorney has been hired. She asked why the issue is being handled in this matter. Workman replied at this time Council is not aware of the legal issue as a whole. He added if an attorney has been hired it is now a legal issue and he deferred to the attorney. Batty stated a number of facts can be disputed and the owners want the City to buy an easement from them. He added the City has been served with a temporary restraining order and the matter will be in court shortly. B. Park Commission Dillman noted the Commission meets tomorrow night and they will discuss 2006 park improvements. He added the Lakeshore Park walk way has been put in. I. Planning Commission Lorsung stated at the last meeting the Commission reviewed the urban commercial district and will recommend approval of all variances at the next Council meeting. Two public hearings, one on signs and one on the wetland ordinance, were continued. Their next meeting will be a joint session with all the Commissions. At the next Council meeting there will be a resolution for Leuer's project. Also for discussion will be the Ace properties phase II revisions, and the comp plan and framework systems review. VII. OLD BUSINESS A. Interim Ordinance Regarding Subdivision of Land Within the Rural Residential Zoning Districts; Establishing a Moratorium; and Directing a Study of Official Controls Related thereto — Public Hearing Workman stated there is a proposal to have a moratorium to have time to study the rural residential area. He added everyone has a different vision of what this is or will be. Smith suggested Batty explain a moratorium to the audience. Batty provided a brief discussion of the moratorium. He noted the ordinance would be for one year, on subdivisions only, within the rural residential zoning districts. All applications are subject to the moratorium provided they have not yet received preliminary plat approval. The decision tonight is whether or not to adopt the moratorium. Workman opened the public hearing at 7:20 p.m. Clarkson Lindley, 1588 Homestead Trail, stated he is neither for nor against the moratorium but hopes the special characteristics of the land will be preserved. Dan Johnson, 2505 Willow Drive, stated Council has the authority to impose a moratorium. He added there is a strong articulation to retain the rural character of the City, but determining what that means is critical. He strongly urged Council to move forward with adoption of the moratorium so the community can develop a standard in preserving the land. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes October 18, 2005 321 Betty Goodman, 2495 Willow Drive, stated the moratorium sounds like a good idea, to step back and Zook at what is needed to control development. She requested Council exempt simple transfers between neighbors that do not create buildable lots. Glenn Jeffrey, 2605 Willow Drive, stated he appreciates and understands the different positions and rationale regarding the issue. He asked if current City standards are not adequate to assist Council and Staff in preserving the rural area in the City. He noted the City is now faced with a development that meets the technical requirements but does not Zook rural. He suggested residents be a part of the study process, looking at communities around the City that have been in a similar situation. David Williams, 1121 Cherokee Road, stated he moved to the neighborhood years ago because of the character of the countryside. He referenced a previous discussion regarding Highways 55 and 12 where a petition had been signed, and noted the people, when given a chance, were willing to support it. He suggested Council step back and take a little time to ensure preservation of the land. Wayne Popham, 2725 Hamel Road, expressed agreement with the moratorium as proposed, suggesting Council take the time to review and keep the rural reserve area. Steven Scherer, 2622 Willow Drive, and sister Cindy, representing parents Hunk and Bea Scherer, 2672 Willow Drive, stated their parents are involved in trying to subdivide their property to provide funds for their health care and this moratorium will prevent them from moving ahead. Tim Druck, 190 Bergamot Drive, stated he purchased land to build a home on it; however, if it cannot be subdivided then they cannot afford it. He read a letter he sent to Council. He noted the moratorium is wrong, the City is trying to appease a few neighbors on School Lake at the expense of others. He added all City ordinances were originally met and requested the High Pointe development move forward. Gary Petrucci, 2975 County Road 24, stated he does not think the moratorium is fair play and that property rights are being violated. The proposed development has met every rule that is on the books. He noted Smith made the resolution and suggested she is trying to put in place more rules and take away more property rights in the City. He added if the moratorium is passed tonight he is going to start the Medina Landowners Association so landowner's interests are protected. He suggested taxes decrease because land will be devalued. Suzie Sween, 2112 Holy Name Drive, stated residents moved here because of the rural nature and she is worried long-term residents will now be restricted from utilizing their property. She added she believes the moratorium is a smoke screen to take away landowners rights. George Stickney, 2590 Countryside Drive, stated he is representing several clients that have large parcels in the City and is against the moratorium. He asked how many parcels are actually large enough that can be conformed to a subdivision. He added the moratorium would adversely affect those properties that are contiguous and the owners that have waited to do something with their property. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes October 18, 2005 322 Jim Renier, 3392 Hamel Road, asked why the City needs a moratorium if Staff is doing their job. He also asked what assurance residents have that the moratorium would not start over after this one ends. He added why invade an investor or citizens' rights to get a job done that Staff should have been doing anyway. Paul Larson, 3865 Shoreline Drive, representing Bradley Hansen, 2805 Pioneer Trail, stated they oppose the moratorium. He added if the moratorium is approved Staff needs to evaluate properties that are currently for sale because it will show they made an effort in such items as planning although they have not come to the board yet. Todd Rapp, Attorney, representing Michael and Holly Leuer, stated Council accepts responsibility for a moratorium if it can identify there is some significant threat to public health, safety, or welfare; however, there is no set of facts which rise to this level. He noted all particulars of the High Pointe subdivision conform to the current ordinance. He reviewed the memorandum by the City Planner and noted it appears the general consensus of Staff is that it adequately protects the rural area of the City. He added Council does not have sufficient facts to adopt a moratorium. Dave Dalbec, 3085 Hamel Road, asked if the moratorium has to run for the entire 12 months. He added the moratorium would allow for a reflection on where the City is going. Batty replied the drafted moratorium states 12 months but can be terminated earlier if Council chooses. He added it can only be extended for significant reasons for a specific time period, which he does not see it meeting any of the reasons. Wally Marx, 2700 Parkview Drive, stated Council is moving ahead in protecting the rural residential area. He requested Council step back and look at the City in its entirety. He added there is nothing wrong with spending months reviewing this. Charles Nolan, Nolan Brothers, stated Council should have received a letter from him and one via an attorney. Council has the ability to exercise a moratorium. Preserving a City is not always an easy task, but it is the number one goal in this City. He stated the moratorium isn't stopping the High Pointe development but has exposed the weaknesses in the ordinance. He added the moratorium is a temporary situation to stop, pause, look, and study. Michael Leuer, 1522 Medina, Road, asked how many plats were done last year in the rural residential area. Lorsung replied possibly three. Leuer stated within the next 12 months everything that is left in the City is not going to be developed. He added because the City already has a very restrictive ordinance, it makes more sense to send this to a Committee to study, rather than impose a moratorium. He believes the moratorium is pointed at the High Pointe development. Barb Workman, 2212 Chippewa Road, stated she has lived in the City for over 20 years and lives on 20 acres. She noted she is upset because the issue seems very political and seems to have arisen due to someone coming in yet meeting the guidelines of what was in place. She added this is Council's job and a cop out to say wait a minute. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes October 18, 2005 323 Dave Wesley, 25 Hamel Road, stated he has lived in the City since 1959, and from Minneapolis to Medina is being developed. He added he does not understand why there is a moratorium if a developer meets the requirements. Adams noted letters be included in the public file from the following, Jeffrey A. Scherber; Charlie Nolan, Nolan Brothers, Inc.; Thomas H. Goodman, Siegel, Brill, Greupner, Duffy & Foster, P.A.; Cal Krupa, Freshpac LLC; and Mark and Ginny Metzger. Workman closed the public hearing at 8:05 p.m. Smith stated she is in favor of the moratorium because she is trying to protect the rural character. There are several reasons a moratorium is needed. She referenced restrictions in the cities of Independence and Greenfield. She noted although they worked hard on the comp plan and subdivision ordinance, the City failed and now needs time to sit back and review it so the City retains its' rural residential area. She added she represents all residents, not just a few. She concluded three houses on a ridge is not rural. Cavanaugh stated Medina has set criteria of rural but it is very subjective. The benchmark historically used is five acres of contiguous soils. A developer has come in with a plan that fits the City's criteria and by enacting a moratorium while someone is at the doorstep is not fair. He noted he heard good comments on both sides of the issue. One particular item, putting parents with health issues on hold for a year places them in a difficult situation. He added a moratorium has come up over one development, which has put restrictions on other residents and has put them in a difficult situation. Brinkman stated he can see both sides and does not want to stop developments coming forth. He noted he does not see that this transpired because of the High Pointe development, but as something that has exposed itself. If the development of three houses were tucked in and covered with trees that would be more rural. Some larger developments have been allowed in the outskirts of the City. There are so many components of High Pointe that are working against rural. There are items that need to be looked at, especially how they affect other people. He added he is not in favor of a 12-month moratorium, but would like to see six months. Weir stated she believes it is fair to landowners and developers to sort out the ordinance. She referenced the City of Orono ordinance. She suggested incentives should be given to developers if the natural features are preserved. She added she is interested in a timeline of six months, and has difficulty with including applications that have been to the Planning Commission if the timeline is 12 months. Weir asked staff for their comments on the timeline. Adams stated Staffs preference was one year due to current workload, immediate development projects under construction or pending final approvals, and other policy directives/goals that have been set from Council. He noted open space planning may be starting more formally in a few weeks and the comp plan review will be opened in February or March. Utilizing a one-year period for the moratorium would coincide with these more global efforts of planning and desirably provide a better product. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes October 18, 2005 324 Weir reiterated that the timeline would influence her willingness to include or exclude current applications. Workman stated he was not presiding at the last meeting when the issue was debated. He noted he opposes the moratorium and believes it is the wrong way to do things. Although some items need to be fine-tuned, a moratorium is unfair and will create hardships. The moratorium has been brought to the forefront with one development. Many people have gotten together and it has become very political. He added he might agree to a timeline of 90 days. Smith stated she respectfully disagrees. She noted she believes it is not political and that they will work hard to find a resolution. The High Pointe development is not rural. She pledged to put in extra time so the moratorium concludes in six months. Moved by Smith, seconded by Weir, to approve the interim ordinance regarding subdivision of land within the rural residential zoning districts; establishing a moratorium; and directing a study of official controls related thereto, with the change to six months. Workman stated he would oppose any moratorium with a timeline of six months. He added he believes this is resolvable without disrupting developments. Cavanaugh stated he is fine with a shorter version and does not believe it should take six months. He suggested applications already presented to the Planning Commission be excluded along with any PUDs. Brinkman stated he has some issues at the Planning Commission level regarding unclear direction. He noted he will support a six-month moratorium, but if Staff can get it all done in 90 days or less that would be better. He added a six-month timeline brings it to April, to which developers can start their projects in spring. He stated he believes all applications should be included. Smith referenced the City of Greenfield ordinance noting the City needs to review items such as this. She clarified the motion includes all applications that do not have preliminary plat approval, which is by law what Council can do, with a six month timeline. Weir stated she believes a moratorium is needed to clarify items and to guarantee in the future more rural development in the City. She noted she has some difficulty changing the rules with applications already with the Planning Commission. She added a six- month timeline seems more workable and fair. Adams asked if the moratorium could be extended from six to 12 months. He added although the stated area is rural residential it includes the RR-UR and R-2. Batty replied he is not sure Council could extend to 12 months because the statute was changed recently. It states it can only be extended with a public hearing and findings under three conditions, whereby none of these three conditions are likely to apply. The conservative position is to say Council would not be able to extend the timeline beyond this initial period. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes October 18, 2005 325 Workman stated a moratorium will affect some Council members personally if they have property in the area, and asked if that would change their ability to vote. Batty replied no, because this would be a vote on a general application. Cavanaugh stated one item to consider is that the City has a process and whether or not Council agrees with the outcome, the developers followed the process and fit into the defined benchmark that was used. He asked if it is fair to change the rules at this point. Weir stated she is struggling with the two applications before the Planning Commission but is not concerned with the submitted incomplete one. Lorsung replied the third application is now on board and they are requesting a variance. Weir asked if Smith would consider an amendment to the motion to exclude applications that have been before the Planning Commission. Smith replied no. She stated she believes the High Pointe development property and other properties on Willow Drive have very clearly shown that some existing parts of the ordinance that deals with numbers does not work. She added she believes a moratorium usually comes forward because an application is brought in. Workman stated another option is to vote against these plats individually. Cavanaugh agreed, stating let them stand on their own merit. Motion Passed. (Smith, Weir, Brinkman — aye; Workman and Cavanaugh — nay). Smith requested Staff bring to the next meeting an initial outline in order to get this done as soon as possible. She also suggested Mr. Leuer and Mr. Nolan be involved. Workman recessed the meeting at 8:52 p.m. Workman reconvened the meeting at 9:03 p.m. A. Preliminary Plat to High Pointe Ridge (Across from Baker Park Reserve on Parkview Drive) Batty stated in light of Council's action tonight regarding the moratorium this item is moot. He suggested Council direct Staff to send a letter requesting the application be withdrawn and, as a back up, have Staff draft a resolution of denial consistent with the moratorium which would require action at the next meeting. Cavanaugh asked if it is possible to make a motion to approve the plat effective six months from today. Batty replied yes, but it would then be pulled out of the moratorium. Moved by Smith, seconded by Brinkman, to direct Staff to send a letter to the applicant requesting the application is withdrawn and to direct Staff to draft a resolution of denial consistent with the moratorium to be brought back to Council. Motion passed. (Brinkman, Smith, Weir - aye; Workman and Cavanaugh — nay). Brinkman questioned why there were two nay votes on this motion, stating that the moratorium has been adopted. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes October 18, 2005 326 C. Ordinance Amending Sections 400.01, 400.11, and 400.13 Regarding Driveways Adams stated there currently is no consensus regarding footage setbacks; therefore, Staff is looking for direction from Council. He added this became an issue due to a recent application. Smith stated she could envision driveways together and then split to their particular garages. Adams replied the ordinance is encouraging a zero setback. Lorsung stated the ordinance should make the most efficient space available and encourage shared driveways. Each application should be reviewed based on their specifics. Adams stated this needs to go back to Staff to redraft. Workman replied it is being sent back to Staff. VIII. NEW BUSINESS A. Uptown Hamel Sign Design and Selection Lorsung stated after visibility discussions Staff talked with MNDOT regarding placing a sign in Uptown Hamel. Notice was sent calling for designs, which two were received. Workman asked if the sign is covered under funding or the TIF budget. Adams replied it is budgeted for under TIF. Bill Thibault, Thibault Associates, reviewed his proposed sign. He noted he felt it was important to have a three-dimensional kind of sign which would be visible in many directions and imitate Uptown landform. He reviewed the letter placement and coloring. He suggested landscaping and lighting. Cavanaugh asked what is the cost estimate. Thibault replied he is unsure. Lorsung asked what are the rough elevations. Thibault replied eight to nine feet. Smith stated the sign should have "City of Medina". She added Thibault's proposal is very classy and captures the essence of Uptown Hamel. Adams stated Staff will come back with a proposal and cost estimate. IX. CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT Adams informed Council the City was served with a temporary restraining order (TRO) for the Hackamore Road water project, as discussed in the Comments Section. Batty stated it has not yet been reviewed. He added Council approved the project and the City's position is that in areas where they have a right-of-way they have the ability to use it. He noted the City has statutory user authority, if the City has used the roadway for at least six years it is deemed that the City has received dedication of the travel surface of the road. The owners have taken the position that the City has taken the land. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes October 18, 2005 327 Cavanaugh asked if the City has the right to condemn the area used by the road. Batty replied yes, if necessary. He added the temporary restraining order is immediate, but the City does not believe this is right because the owners knew about the project for months. There could be damages at this point in the year if the crew has to stop and come back next year. Workman asked if the contractor has stopped. Batty replied no, but if the TRO is issued the contractor will have to stop. He noted the completion date is set for November 15. Adams requested Council read the Ryan memo on earthwork calculations. He added it will be on the next agenda for policy discussion. Adams stated Staff cleaned out several pieces of equipment/furnishings in City Hall on Friday in preparation for renovations. He added construction should start this week. X. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Workman stated this section is intended for meetings the Mayor and Council attended. He added he has not attended any meetings to report on. Weir stated the Planning Commission completed a rewrite of the bylaws. Workman asked if it is appropriate for the Planning Commission to write its' own bylaws. Weir stated yes, it will come to Council for approval. She added Staff has put together a list and requests for money regarding the traffic intersection improvements on Highway 55. The list will be a part of the Highway 55 Corridor capital improvement plan. Weir stated she would like to see a sketch plan of drainage in Uptown Hamel because there are a lot of trees being cut down by the pond, maybe for drainage to the pond on the south side. Kellogg replied the only trees that needed to be cleared for the project was two spruce trees. Adams stated Staff will look at this tomorrow. Smith asked about dirt from runoff running into the parking lot. She also asked if this happens could it be put into the contract that the contractor could get fined. Kellogg stated all stormwater should have gone to the pond but now will be exported as part of the project. He added he is not sure the City can impose fines. Adams stated there are a few developers that are breaking rules and staff has threatened with withdrawing their letter of credit or implementing a stop work order. Lorsung replied every developer has broken the rules but once threatened generally comply. Cavanaugh asked if Staff has the ability to wave a stick without Council approval. Adams replied yes, generally per provisions in the development agreements. XI. APPROVAL TO PAY THE BILLS Moved by Weir, seconded by Smith, to approve the bills, order check numbers 028509- 028573 for $140,643.08, and payroll check numbers 019522-019543 for $28,936.08. Motion passed unanimously. Medina City Council Meeting Minutes October 18, 2005 328 XII. ADJOURN Moved by Smith, seconded by Brinkman, to adjoum the meeting at 9:55 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. Attest: 4 4/1 //4J1_,.. 0 Bruce D. Workman, Mayor Chad M. Adams, City Administrator -Clerk Medina City Council Meeting Minutes October 18, 2005 329 ORDER CHECKS - OCTOBER 18, 2005 028509 A.T.& T $92.32 028510 ACCURINT $30.00 028511 ALLSTAR ELECTRIC $3,542.95 028512 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SVC $98.25 028513 BARTON SAND & GRAVEL $740.74 028514 BIFF'S INC. $425.82 028515 BUDGET PRINTING $241.52 028516 CIPHER LABORATORIES $1,247.44 028517 CSC CREDIT SERVICES $22.00 028518 CULLIGAN $106.83 028519 DEEP ROCK WATER COMPANY $36.45 028520 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY $270.00 028521 DINGMANN, IVAN $91.59 028522 ELAN FINANCIAL SERVICE $720.32 028523 FORTIN HARDWARE $149.38 028524 FRONTIER $59.00 028525 GALL'S, INC. $236.91 028526 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL $434.10 028527 HACH COMPANY $73.49 028528 HAMEL BUILDING CENTER $1,659.34 028529 HAMEL FIRE DEPT $25,116.00 028530 HAWKINS INC $70.00 028531 HEDTKE MARKETING $150.00 028532 HENN COOP. SEED EXCHANGE $134.12 028533 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFO.TECH.DEPT $843.59 028534 HIGHWAY 55 RENTAL $60.01 028535 HOSTINGMINNESOTA.COM $24.95 028536 IN'TOXIMETERS, INC. $191.70 028537 KASTER, BONNIE $30.83 028538 KENNEDY & GRAVEN $4,500.00 028539 LAND TITLE $464.41 028540 LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC $96.60 028541 LORETTO FIRE DEPT $16,479.50 028542 MEDIACOM $79.95 028543 METRO WEST INSPECTION $19,219.95 028544 METRO.COUNCIL ENVIRO. SERVICES $11,537.09 028545 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL WASTEWTR $15,634.00 028546 MIKE'S FIX -IT $313.96 028547 MINN. CHIEF'S OF POLICE ASSN. $55.00 028548 MINNESOTA COMMERCE DEPARTMENT $40.00 028549 MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER $9,792.87 028550 NATIONAL WATERWORKS $2,179.09 028551 NELSON ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR $405.00 028552 NORTH AMERICAN FOODS $45.57 028553 NORTHWEST SUBURBAN CHAMBER $30.00 028554 PRESS & NEWS PUBLICATIONS $689.77 028555 PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE CO. OF AM $247.98 028556 QWEST $411.55 028557 REYNOLDS WELDING $31.63 028558 SCHARBER & SONS, INC. $57.64 330 OCTOBER 18, 2005 (CONT'D) 028559 ST. PAUL STAMP WORKS $19.22 028560 STEVENS, T. L. WELL CO., INC $4,672.49 028561 STREICHER'S $94.90 028562 T-MOBILE $19.41 028563 TALLEN & BAERTSCHI $3,749.04 028564 TIME SAVER OFF SITE SEC. $223.00 028565 TWIN CITY WATER CLINIC $60.00 028566 U.S. POSTAL SERVICE $500.00 028567 VERIZON WIRELESS $5.76 028568 WASTE MANAGEMENT-TC WEST $3,398.95 028569 WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE $72.04 028570 WIKNER, ROGER $2,290.50 028571 WRIGHT-HENNEPIN ELECTRIC $160.95 028572 XCEL ENERGY $5,585.77 028573 XEROX CORPORATION $579.84 $140,643.08 PAYROLL CHECKS - OCTOBER 17, 2005 019522 ADAMS, CHAD M. $1,922.44 019523 SCHERER, STEVEN T $1,308.59 019524 MCGILL, CHRISTOPHER R. $1,724.48 019525 HALL, DAVID M. $1,375.51 019526 DILLMAN, JAMES D $1,839.05 019527 DRESSEL, ROBERT P. $1,120.90 019528 BELLAND, EDGAR J $2,231.89 019529 CONVERSE, KEITH A $1,353.38 019530 VIEAU, CECILIA M $1,028.73 019531 DINGMANN, IVAN W $1,263.91 019532 SULANDER, LAURA L. $1,186.65 019533 LARSON, SANDRA L $1,350.22 019534 BOECKER, KEVIN D $1,605.77 019535 GREGORY, THOMAS $1,486.81 019536 LORSUNG, ROSE A $1,171.59 019537 NELSON, JASON $1,950.34 019538 THUL, JEFFREY P. $1,504.68 019539 KLISZCZ, DAVID A. $519.79 019540 VINCK, JOHN J. $1,131.22 019541 FINKE, DUSTIN D. $256.86 019542 MAROHNIC, NICHOLAS $388.22 019543 OLSON, JANET $1,215.05 $28,936.08