Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAboutADSL NetworkPage 1 of 2 Mike Becker From: David Simmonds [admin@mccall.id.us] Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 11:12 To: 'mccico' Cc: Airport Manager Subject: RE: ADSL network Curtis, Thanks for looking at network performance for us. The numbers are quite good. The number of hops is great. Can you clarify the hop into private IP space (10.111.132.38)? I'm still not clear on whether there are - presently - any options available for bandwidth to City Hall other than ADSL or T1. Earlier this year we had talked about a direct connection to a router port but didn't address that when we met the other day. Considering our proximity to your routers, there are probably a number of ways it could be done technically; I just don't know whether the business and regulatory side make it possible. Is there a projected date for the availability of SDSL from your location? Thanks for your help with these questions. - Dave David Simmonds Network Administrator City of McCall 216 East Park St McCall ID 83638 USA 208-634-8547 Desk 208-634-6929 Cell -----Original Message ----- From: mccico [mailto:mccico@citlink.net] Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 8:53 AM To: admin@mccall.id.us Subject: David For this particular instance I was on the same subnet 170.215.65.0 .... this is in essence the same as you will be, with all static IP's at various locations. I think you'll agree that the ping times, even with very large packets, are excellent. With your configuration you will have 1 additional hop, that being the router at the distant end, I am using NAT. Curtis Nimmo 208.634.6100 C:\>ping 170.215.65.42 Pinging 170.215.65.42 with 32 bytes of data Reply from 170.215.65.42: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=26 Reply from 170.215.65.42: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=26 Reply from 170.215.65.42: bytes=32 time=21 ms TTL=26 Reply from 170.215.65.42: bytes=32 time=1Orris TTL=26 Ping statistics for 170.215.65.42: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), 12/4/02 Page 2 of 2 Approximate round trip times in milli -seconds: Minimum = 10ms, Maximum = 21ms, Average = 17ms C:\>ping 170.215.65.42 -1 1400 -t Pinging 170.215.65.42 with 1400 bytes of data: Reply from 170.215.65.42: bytes=1400 time=180ms TTL=26 Reply from 170.215.65.42: bytes=1400 time=181 ms TTL=26 Reply from 170.215.65.42: bytes=1400 time=180ms TTL=26 Reply from 170.215.65.42: bytes=1400 time=171ms TTL=26 Reply from 170.215.65.42: bytes=1400 time=180ms TTL=26 Reply from 170.215.65.42: bytes=1400 time=180ms TTL=26 Reply from 170.215.65.42: bytes=1400 time=180ms TTL=26 Reply from 170.215.65.42: bytes=1400 time=180ms TTL=26 Reply from 170.215.65.42: bytes=1400 time=170ms TTL=26 Reply from 170.215.65.42: bytes=1400 time=170ms TTL=26 Reply from 170.215.65.42: bytes=1400 time=171ms TTL=26 Ping statistics for 170.215.65.42: Packets: Sent = 11, Received = 11, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli -seconds: Minimum = 170ms, Maximum = 181ms, Average = 176ms Control-C ^C C:\>tracert 170.215.65.42 Tracing route to 170.215.65.42 over a maximum of 30 hops 1 <10 ms <10 ms <10 ms 192.168.254.254 2 10 ms 20 ms 20 ms mcal-bras.citlink.net [207.173.230.234] 3 10 ms 20 ms 20 ms 207.173.230.233 4 20 ms 20 ms 20 ms 10. 111. 132.38 5 20 ms 30 ms 30 ms 170.215,65.42 Trace complete. 12/4/02