Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout07 23 15 Agenda w/backupCHAIRMAN: VICE CHAIRMAN: BOARD MEMBER: ALTERNATE MEMBER Paul Lyons, Jr. Thomas Smith Robert Dockerty Hewlett Kent Malcolm Murphy Stanley Rubini S. Curtiss Roach July 16, 2015 REGULAR MEETING AND PUBLIC HEARING BEING HELD BY THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW AND PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWN OF GULF STREAM, FLORIDA ON THURSDAY, JULY 23, 2015 @ 8:30 A.M., IN THE COMMISSION CHAMBERS OF THE TOWN HALL, 100 SEA ROAD, GULF STREAM, FLORIDA. AGENDA I. Call to Order. II. Roll Call. III. Minutes of the Regular Meeting and Public Hearing of 6- 25 -15. IV. Additions, withdrawals, deferrals, arrangement of agenda items. V. Announcements. A. Meeting Dates 1. Regular Meeting & Public Hearing a. September 24, 2015 @ 8:30 A.M. b. October 22, 2015 @ 8:30 A.M. c. November 19, 2015 @ 8:30 A.M. d. December 17, 2015 @ 8:30 A.M. e. January 28, 2016 @ 8:30 A.M. f. February 25, 2016 @ 8:30 A.M. g. March 29, 2016 A 8:30 A.M. VI. PUBLIC HEARING. A. Applications for Development Approval 1. An application submitted by Ken Weitz, Vintage Building & Design, as Agent for Mr. & Mrs. Thomas Clark the owners of property located at 3932 North Ocean Blvd, Gulf Stream, Florida, which is legally described as Lots 99A, 50 & 51, Gulf Stream Properties #2 Subdivision. a. NORTH OCEAN BOULEVARD OVERLAY PERMIT to construct a two car garage with guest suite above within the N. Ocean Blvd. Corridor. b. LEVEL 2 ARCHITECTURAL /SITE PLAN REVIEW to permit construction of a 1,780 square foot two -story Gulf Stream Bermuda style 2 car garage with guest suite above, to match an existing Bermuda style dwelling at 3432 N. Ocean Blvd., Gulf Stream, Florida. 2. An application submitted by Ken Weitz, Vintage Building & Design, as Agent for Mr. & Mrs. Robert A. Wamser, owners of property located at 3541 Polo Drive, Gulf Stream, Florida 33483, legally described as Lot 7, Block 2 in Polo Fields #1 Subdivision. a. LAND CLEARING PERMIT to prepare the property for 5 additions to an existing dwelling. b. SPECIAL EXCEPTION #1 to permit additions to the south side of an existing dwelling that extends an existing non - conforming wall which encroaches approximately 5 ft. into the required 15' south side setback. AGENDA CONTINUED c. SPECIAL EXCEPTION #2 to permit an addition to the north east corner of an existing dwelling that extends an existing non - conforming wall which encroaches approximately 5 ft. into the required 15' north side setback. d. SPECIAL EXCEPTION #3 to permit 3 additions to an existing non - conforming dwelling which extends existing non - conforming walls that encroach approximately 5' into the required 30 ft. combined setback. e. LEVEL 3 ARCHITECTURAL /SITE PLAN REVIEW to permit construction of 5 additions (1,286 square feet), 3 of which extend existing non - conforming walls that will encroach an additional 5' into the required 15' side setbacks, to an existing non - conforming Gulf Stream Bermuda style, one story, single family dwelling. VII. Continued from Meeting of June 25, 2015. A. Controlling size and placement of second stories. 1. Mr. Kent's suggestions 2. Mr. Minor's comments VIII. Items by Staff. IX. Items by Board Members. X. Public. XI. Adjournment. SHOULD ANY INTERESTED PARTY SEEK TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW AND PLANNING BOARD WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING, SAID PARTY WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS, AND FOR SUCH PURPOSE, MAY NEED TO INSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. 286.0105, F.S.S. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING AND PUBLIC HEARING HELD BY THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW AND PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWN OF GULF STREAM, FLORIDA ON THURSDAY, JUNE 25, 2015 AT 8:30 A.M., IN THE COMMISSION CHAMBERS OF THE TOWN HALL, 100 SEA ROAD, GULF STREAM, FLORIDA. I. Call to Order. Chairman Lyons called the meeting to order at 8:30 A.M. II. Roll Call. Present and Participating: Absent with Notice: Also Present & Participating: Paul Lyons Hewlett Kent Malcom Murphy Stanley Rubini William Thrasher John Randolph Rita Taylor Robert Dockerty Thomas Smith William Wietsma Jennifer Snyder David Bodker Chairman Board Member Board Member Alternate Member Town Manager Town Attorney Town Clerk Board Member Vice Chairman Architect Architect Landscape Architect III. Minutes of the Regular Meeting and Public Hearing of 5- 28 -15. Mr. Kent asked that mention be made that the Board felt that the North /South Design District should be included along with the Core and Place Au Soleil when consideration is given to second story construction. Mr. Murphy moved the approval of the minutes as amended with Mr. Kent's suggestion. The motion was seconded by Mr. Rubini and all voted AYE. IV. Additions, withdrawals, deferrals, arrangement of agenda items There were no changes in the agenda. V. Announcements. A. Meeting Dates 1. Regular Meeting & Public Hearing a. July 23, 2015 @ 8:30 A.M. b. September 24, 2015 @ 8:30 A.M. c. October 22, 2015 @ 8:30 A.M. d. November to be determined e. December to be determined Mr. Kent said he would not be able to attend the July and September meetings. Chairman Lyons believed dates should be chosen for the November and December meetings and suggested that November 19, 2015 and December 17, 2015. Mr. Kent moved that the dates that were just suggested by Chairmen Lyons be approved and Mr. Ribini seconded the motion with all voting AYE. VI. PUBLIC HEARING. ARPB Regular Meeting & Public Hearing June 25, 2015 Chairman Lyons asked if there was any ex -parte communications to report and there was none. He then asked for those who intended to speak during the public hearing to please stand and receive the Oath. The Town Clerk administered the Oath to William Wietsma, David Bodker, Paul Engle and Jennifer Snyder. A. Applications for Development Approval 1. An application submitted by Thomas Laudani, Seaside Builders, as Agent for Mr.& Mrs. James Cacioppo, the owners of property located at 3140 Polo Drive, Gulf Stream, Florida, which is legally described as the south 96.89 ft. of Lot 6 and all of Lot 7, Re -plat of Polo Cove Subdivision. Ms. Snyder explained that this is a partial 2 -story house with a 4 bay garage, one bay a small one for a golf cart, a circular driveway across the front of the house and a driveway and motor court along the north side in front of the garage. She further said there would be a large pool in the back with some arbor elements and the entire property will be heavily landscaped with a large open area in the rear that will provide a full view of the Intracoastal Waterway. Ms. Snyder said the project will meet or exceed the required setbacks. She pointed out the front entry and the wings on each side of the entry. With regard to the interior, the owner wanted volume ceilings in the living room area, etc. and they will be building the ceilings into the trusses to accomplish this, she said. In addressing the second floor, she said only 22' of it is facing Polo Drive with the rest directed toward Palm Way, and that 90% of the entire structure is one story. Ms. Snyder said they established the beam at 9'6 ", provided a balcony on the front facing Polo Drive and stepped the second story down in the back to reduce the massiveness of the second floor. She pointed out that the same person owns the property to the north and that also prompted them to place the second floor on the north side for less impact on the rest of the neighborhood. She noted that the house has the typical Georgian features to fit into the character of the area. Mr. Bodker, Landscape Architect, explained that the owners wanted to keep an old Florida appearance with heavy landscaping and that they would be using heavy cut coral for all of the hardscape. He displayed a sample of this material and photos of property in Gulf Stream that have this material. In order to present an almost jungle like appearance as requested by the owners, there will be several different sized layers of planting in the front and sides with a more open look in the rear to provide an un- restricted view of the Intracoastal Waterway. He gave a detailed description of each type of material to be used. Town Clerk Taylor reported that there had been a call from the neighbor on the south who asked for an explanation of the two Special Exceptions that are being requested. Following the explanation, Mr. Weiss told the Clerk that he had no objection to this project. In answer to a question from the Chairman, Ms. Snyder said that the body KA ARPB Regular Meeting 5 Public Hearing June 25, 2015 of the house will be white, with an off -white trim and very dark blue shutters with white flat tile roof. Each of the Board Members complimented Ms. Snyder on the project and her Presentation and stated they had no problem with it as presented. a. Demolition Permit to remove existing structures. Mr. Kent moved to recommend approval of a demolition permit and Mr. Rubini seconded the motion with all voting AYE. b. Special Exception #1 to permit a 30 ft. rear setback. Mr. Kent then moved to recommend approval of a Special Exception to permit a 30' waterfront rear setback as allowed by Section 70- 75(j)(1). The motion was seconded by Mr. Rubini and all voted AYE. c. Special Exception #2 to permit 238 sq. ft. of covered, unenclosed area that exceeds the maximum permitted floor area ratio. Mr. Kent moved and Mr. Murphy seconded to recommend approval of a Special Exception to allow 238 square feet of covered, unenclosed area that exceeds the maximum floor area ratio (Section 70- 72(b)(2)). All voted AYE at roll call. d. Level 3 Architectural /Site Plan Review to permit construction of a partial two -story 8,560 square foot Georgian style single family dwelling with 4 car garage and a swimming pool. Mr. Kent moved to recommend approval of a Level 3 Architectural /Site Plan Review to permit the construction of a partial 2 story single family Georgian style dwelling with attached 4 car garage, consisting of 8,560 square feet and a swimming pool with the following conditions: 1) Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the owner of the property shall prepare and record a deed restriction which shall provide that all roof projection areas shall remain unenclosed as per approval of the special exception for as long as the structure is in existence or exceeds the maximum FAR. 2) The electric service and utility lines shall be buried. 3) Any minor modifications in the landscape plan shall be submitted to the Town Manager for review and approval and any major modifications shall be brought back to the ARPB for review and approval, prior to commencement of landscaping. Mr. Murphy seconded the motion and all voted AYE at roll call. 2. An application submitted by William Wietsma, Architect, as agent for Danburg Hansen LLC, owner of property located at 540 Middle Road, Gulf Stream, Florida 33483, legally descried as Lot 16 and west 50' of Lot 17, Gulf Stream Cove Subdivision. Mr. Wietsma explained that the existing covered patio in the rear is only 8' wide which is not large enough to accommodate the outdoor living style that the Hansen family enjoys. He said they are proposing to extend the existing another 8' which will give a 16' wide patio. He advised that in order to do this, the existing will have to be removed and then rebuild the desired 16' area. In addition, changes will be made with the window and door openings into the house and roll down phantom screens will be installed around the patio that can be lowered when 3 ARPB Regular Meeting & Public Hearing June 25, 2015 necessary. He called attention to the existing 8' outdoor balcony above which will increase to 16'. This would reduce the amount of light entering the home. To address this situation, he is proposing to install two skylights in the floor of the balcony that will be flat and made of a material (laminated glass) that is strong enough to be walked on. All were in agreement that this will be an improvement both in appearance and utility. a. Special Exception to allow 247 sq. ft. of covered, unenclosed area that exceeds the maximum permitted Floor Area Ratio. Mr. Murphy Moved to recommend approval of a special exception to allow 247 square feet of covered, unenclosed area that exceeds the maximum permitted Floor Area Ratio and Mr. Rubini seconded the motion with all voting AYE. b. Level 3 Architectural /Site Plan Review to permit the addition of a new single story loggia on an existing single family Gulf Stream Bermuda two -story dwelling. Mr. Murphy then moved to recommend approval of a Level 3 Architectural /Site Plan based on a finding that the proposed addition of a new single story loggia on an existing single family Gulf Stream Bermuda two -story dwelling meet the minimum intent of the Design Manual and applicable review standards with the following condition: Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the owner of the property shall prepare and record a deed restriction which shall provide that all roof projection areas shall remain unenclosed as per approval of the special exception for as long as the structure is in existence or exceeds the maximum FAR. Mr. Rubini seconded the motion and all voted AYE at roll call. VII. Continued From Meeting May 28, 2015. Chairman Lyons announced that Mr. Kent has prepared a proposal addressing the matters of controlling the size and placement of second stories for presentation at this time. A. Reduction of percentage allowed for second story B. Placement of the second story (FOLLOWING IS A COPY OF MR. KENT'S PRESENTATION COVERING THESE ITEMS) RECOMMENDED CHANGES TO GULF STREAM CODE FOR TWO STORY HOMES IN CORE, PLACE AU SOLEIL AND NORTH /SOUTH DISTRICTS The town commissioners and the mayor have assigned the ARPB to examine ways to discourage the construction of 2 story homes. In the May meeting we decided not to reduce FAR percentages because "the problem is not so much with the size of the building, but the form of the building ". Ways to reduce the appearance of mass were discussed at the May meeting, and recommendation was made to continue discussion at the June meeting. Ell ARPB Regular Meeting & Public Hearing June 25, 2015 Section 70 -74 SETBACKS 1) Increase Front Yard Setback to 35' for 2 story portions of 2 story houses. - Single story setback remains at 30' 2) Establish 2nd Story Side Setback: based on the width of the 1st story, Manual currently limits 2nd story floor Square footage to 70% of 1st floor. There are no guidelines for Linear footage across front elevation. Recommend the ARPB establish one of two solutions: a)A fixed number, i.e. 2nd story must be setback at least 101from the lst story walls, or, b)A variable number based on a % of the width of the 1st story. The means to calculate the 2nd story setback is important because the Code provides formulas for architects to calculate: a) Property Setbacks b) Second Story square footage (70% of 1st floor square footage) c) FAR Floor Area Ratio to establish allowable square footage Yet the guidance for 2 story house massing is arbitrary leaving "Building forms with central massing" to be interpreted by the architect, town staff, ARPB members, and town commissioners in a myriad of different ways. In the May meeting Mr. Wietsma, a highly respected architect in the recent history of Gulf Stream stated he "felt some setbacks for the second stories, at least 10 feet, should be considered, and some restrictions put in place to prevent structures that have a block like appearance ". option b) dovetails perfectly with the calculation of the Property Side Yard Setback. The calculation would be made the same way as the Side yard setback: Setback for 1st story = Lot width x 30 %. Minimum Setback 15' Setback for 2nd story = 1st story x 30 %. Minimum Setback 10' (10' minimum setback for the 2nd story should be 10' to give architects greater flexibility in the positioning of the 2nd story over the 1st story.) The closest the 2nd story could be built to a side property line is 25' and 30' to a roadway using the above formula. 3) Establish a section for 2nd stories with FAR less than 20% of total FAR There are numerous small second story structures in the districts under review. These consist mostly of guest rooms placed above garages, and are usually added years after the original single story house is built. While these structures do not conform with the "central massing" called 5 ARPB Regular Meeting & Public Hearing June 25, 2015 for in the code, because of their small size, generally 10 - 200 of the total FAR, they are "harmonious" with the character of districts currently under review. To give architects greater flexibility, and to encourage single story homes with very modest 2nd stories, I recommend we create an additional section to address "2nd Story structures where the 2nd story FAR is less than 200 of the total FAR" That section would allow for 1) Placement of 2nd stories outside the setbacks established for large 2nd stories. 2) Minimum Setback of 25' from any roadway. 3) Maximum eve height 20' Attorney Randolph suggested that a dis- incentive to constructing a two story house would be to require that the entire structure have an additional 5 foot setback plus the existing 700 of the 13t floor square footage. Both Mr. Kent and Mr. Thrasher believed that would result in the structure having the appearance of a flat "block ". Mr. Thrasher favored having a maximum measurement for a plane before a break to provide some articulation in the front. Chairman Lyons said he favored having a separate section for 2nd story additions of 200 or less and all of the members and Mr. Thrasher were in favor of this. Town Manager Thrasher believed that the Board is not in a position as yet to make a final recommendation on these matters and suggested that this be on the next agenda and that Mr. Kent's suggested language be sent to Marty Minor after this meeting to get his opinion and Chairman Lyons was in agreement. All members were also in agreement with Mr. Thrasher's suggestion. VIII. Items by Staff. There were no items from the staff. IX. Items by Board Members. There were no items from the Board Members. X. Public. There was no comment from the public. 9 ARPB Regular Meeting & Public Hearing June 25, 2015 XI. Adjournment. Chairman Lyons adjourned the meeting at 10:45 A.M. Rita L. Taylor Town Clerk TOWN OF GULF STREAM ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW AND PLANNING REPORT Application #: 015 -7 Owner: M/M Thomas Clark Address: 3432 North Ocean Blvd. Agent: Ken Weitz, Vintage Building CCC C& Design Proposed Improvement: To construct 2 car garage with guest suite above. Approvals Requested: North Ocean Blvd. Overlay To construct a two car garage with guest suite above within the North Ocean Blvd. Corridor Level II Architectural/Site Plan: To permit construction of a 1,780 SF two -story Gulf Stream Bermuda style 2 car garage with guest suite above, to match an existing Bermuda style dwelling at 3432 North Ocean Blvd., Gulf Stream, Florida. Gross Lot Size: 27,580 SF Effective Lot Area: 27,580 SF Proposed Total Floor Area: 6,742 SF Allowable: 8,116 SF Zoning District: RS -C FFE: Considered During Review: Height: 26' 4 ", Preferred 5 30' Section 66 -144 Standards: Regarding Level II & III architectural/ site plan review Section 70-4 How to use this manual: Regarding Design Standards Section 66 -1. Definition - Guest House Section 70 -67. Effective lot area Section 70 -71. Floor area ratios Section 70 -74. Setbacks. Section 70 -100. Roof and eave heights Section 70 -187. Table of District Standards Recommendations: Motion to approve North Ocean Blvd. Overlay permit to construct a two car garage with guest suite above to be located within the North Ocean Blvd. Corridor Motion to approve Level II Architectural/ Site Plan based on a finding that the proposed construction of a 1,780 SF two -story Gulf Stream Bermuda style 2 car garage with guest suite above, to match an existing Bermuda style dwelling style, one- story, single family dwelling meet the minimum intent of the Design Manual and applicable review standards. Architectural Review and Planning Board ARPB File #015 -07 July 23, 2015 ARPB Date: July 23, 2015 Action: North Ocean Blvd. Corridor Permit: Level II Architectural /Site Plan Review: Page 2 Town of Gulf Stream TOWN OF GULF STREAM APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL This form is to be used for all development review applications to be heard by the Town of Gulf Stream Architectural Review and Planning Board, Board of Adjustment, and /or Town Commission. To complete the form properly, please review the accompanying Town of Gulf Stream Instruction Manual for Application for Development Review Form. Failure to complete this form properly will delay its consideration. ARPB File # /— f To be completed by all applicants. PART II. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Project Information I.A.I. Project/Owner Name: �OJVl0.$�L I.A.2. Project Address:Zql? A (}fie Aayd ,7iAeSftf0AAA g 33� -183 I.A.3. Project Property Legal Description: tqU 1E ShMaA „ QA _t!.b `-kid, 50 - I.A.4. Project Description (describe In detail, including # of stories, etc.) "t a —rpL 11IU_ 4 alMeaS o aJ^ A Q01,QJ+SW; T �1MVD I.A.5. Square Footage of New Structure or Addition: �40I34 ° l �$S ( S jy L �'Dq S Sp Architectural Style: .pyA*4F14,n 0 1.A.6. Check all that apply: V*�Archilectural /Site Plan Review Overlay 6( Land Clearing *North Ocean Boulevard y (complete section B) ❑ Demolition of Structures 11 Non-residential uses 11 Variance (complete section G) ❑t,Special Exception (complete section F) 1.A.7. (a) Proposed F.F.E.: _ _ J Type of Foundation: ttA B. Owner Information 1.B.1. Owner Address: I.B.2. Owner I.B.3. Owner C. Agent information I.C.1. Agent Name and Firm Name: I.C.2. Agent Address: I.C.3. Agent Phone Number: 1.C.4. AoentSinnal,,ro- Pre -App Date: urticial Use Only App Dale: ARPB Date: Com Date: Recommendation: _ Decision: TC Date: 3 H "1, 0 /,5—a 01937 0E2 OD > -s -/ti Application for Development Approval Form ADA.2000 revised 6/13100 Fax %I ,� -I'1aa Page 2 Town of Gulf Stream PART III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION To be completed by all applicants after pre- application conference with Town Staff. Please be concise but brief. Attach additional sheets only when necessary and be sure to include the appropriate and complete question number for each response. A. Project Description and Justification III.A.1. In what zoning district is the project site located? 95— C Si4� a"11 0tN2 III.A.2. Is the project compatible with the intent of the zoning district ? ®e No Explain: 44 hAr—. L11 , cC.,"1 IS .'"'118 mod:h nnzk ow'V IQ P,14 4 � L cd allha�kS �,,td cbn fv rrc,tuiiS ice► rhWe- of lan d clel,l o� LA 14 ' oil III.A.3. Is the project consistent with the Fblure Land tie Map and goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan? t e No Explain: III.A.4. How are ingress and egress to the property to be provided? III.A.5. How are the following a. Stormwater Drainage b. Sanitary Sewer 1'r c. Potable water _S2 d. Irrigation Water e. Electricity f. Telephone Q� g. Gas px h. Cable Televisinn 4 being provided to the property? III.A.6. If the project involves the erection of one or more structures, please describe how the structures are consistent with the criteria in Section 66 -144 of the Town of Gulf Stream Code. (Attach additional sheet if necessary.) PART IV. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Section A is to be completed by all applicants after pre- application conference with Town staff. Answering "Yes" to any question in Section A requires the completion of additional Sections as indicated. A. Additional Approvals /Requirements IV.A.1. Does the proJectLjuuQLye land area within fifty feet (50') of the A1A (North Ocean Boulevard) right -of -way? Yes No (If "Yes ", Section B of this part must be completed.) IV.A.2. Does the project involve the demolition of one or more structures? Yes No (If "Yes ", Section C of this part must be completed.) IV.A.3. Does the project involve the clearing or the filling of any portion of an a vacant lot or more than fifty percent (50 %) of the landscape area of a developed lot? Yes No (If "Yes ", Section D of this part must be completed.) IV.A.4. Does the project require approval of a Special Exception? Yes No (If "Yes ", Section E of this part must be completed.) IV.A.5. Is the pro' t at variance with any regulations contained in the Zoning Code? No Yes If "Yes ", Section G of this part must be completed.) Application for Development Approval, Form ADA.32000 Page February 2002 7h vn of Gulf Stream B. Projects Requiring North Ocean Boulevard Overlay Permit IV.B.1. What significant landscape features or architectural features are to be disturbed or added and to what extent? IV.B.2. Describe the need and justification for the disturbance /addition: VQ a IV.B.3. Will the disturbance /addition destroy or seriously impair visual relationships among buildings, landscape features and open space, or introduce incompatible landscape features or plant material that destroys or impairs significant views or vistas within the North Ocean Boulevard Overlay District? Yes I o� Explain: IV.13.4. How is the design consistent with the AM Landscape Enhancement Project? I IV.B.5. What mitigation is proposed so that the disturbance /addition has the least impact possible to the visual and aesthetic quality of the North Ocean Boulevard Overlay District: V- /1 C. Projects Requiring a Demolition Permit IV.C.1. When are the existing structures to be demolished? IV.C.2. When are the proposed structures to be constructed? IV.C.3. What is the landmark status of the structures to be demolished? D. Projects Requiring a Land Clearing Permit IV.D.1. Describe those vegetative materials of B inches in diameter and greater to be North Ocean Boulevard Overlay District: IV.D.2. Describe the need and justification for the removal /relocation: IV.D.3. How is the removal from the project site of vegetation to be mitigated: IV.D.4. How are the remaining and relocated vegetative materials to be protected and preserved during the land clearing and constriction activities and thereafter? IV.D.5. What replacement materials are proposed? Application for Development Approval, Form ADA.32000 Page 4 February 2002 A "IEANDE`R- WA T -x+wn�s cA. = Iel: 1 0,:t1 �+P 1 1 "os CIO "IDiTTTTiitTllTfl�l �I 70O 9 I I << FRORT sE -- - ARC = 174.20' C.A. = 3120'20' RADIUS = 2900.93' i \J Z D u o 1 r c Nr_ 1 iO.1 1 1 u+1 nl 1 1 1 1 � 11 xl 1 O 1 O 1 [fyC o zW 1 O Z N R g u m - 1 1 1 n m 11 i �/ m 0 m -�} m m ° °o a n R N 0 �oyz qyN N p (� w n O I 0 N 1 0 O I o n y 000777 n 0 r-I N�3 �oz q 11 ��pp mm ^1 'tl to e N n b \ II �q >C 8O � N Y c e p a a m N o In y p °o d a °w w N yN q "IEANDE`R- WA T -x+wn�s cA. = Iel: 1 0,:t1 �+P 1 1 "os CIO "IDiTTTTiitTllTfl�l �I 70O 9 I I << FRORT sE -- - ARC = 174.20' C.A. = 3120'20' RADIUS = 2900.93' i \J Z D u o 1 r c Nr_ 1 iO.1 1 1 u+1 nl 1 1 1 1 � 11 xl 1 O 1 O 1 0 o zW 1 O Z N R g u m - 1 1 1 1 11 �/ "IEANDE`R- WA T -x+wn�s cA. = Iel: 1 0,:t1 �+P 1 1 "os CIO "IDiTTTTiitTllTfl�l �I 70O 9 I I << FRORT sE -- - ARC = 174.20' C.A. = 3120'20' RADIUS = 2900.93' i \J Z D u o -o90 r c Nm o�� m � o C mr T(7i 2- r � iqn °mmAm n9 r$p46 p - - - - -- 8 W n -oonp- 0 o zW o m O Z N R g u m - kID y0 oc U4�y4UN m -�} w � n R N 0 �oyz qyN N p (� w n O I 0 N 1 0 O I o n y 000777 n 0 r-I N�3 �oz 11 ��pp mm ^1 'tl to e N n b \ II �q >C 8O � N Y "IEANDE`R- WA T -x+wn�s cA. = Iel: 1 0,:t1 �+P 1 1 "os CIO "IDiTTTTiitTllTfl�l �I 70O 9 I I << FRORT sE -- - ARC = 174.20' C.A. = 3120'20' RADIUS = 2900.93' i \J Z D u at N I/ 9e 0 \i 2� 6� ocn, 1 � N 1 i & 2 STORY RESIDENCE a #3432 < FLOOR +9.60 9 A g(A Y A A y� T NORTH OCEAN BOULEVARD — STATE ROAD A -1 —A -- — — — — — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - v I S R 1 T� I lVl r� I I o -o90 r c Nm o�� m � o C mr T(7i 2- r � iqn °mmAm n9 r$p46 p - - - - -- 8 W n -oonp- 0 o zW o m O Z N R g u m - kID y0 oc U4�y4UN m -�} X054 at N I/ 9e 0 \i 2� 6� ocn, 1 � N 1 i & 2 STORY RESIDENCE a #3432 < FLOOR +9.60 9 A g(A Y A A y� T NORTH OCEAN BOULEVARD — STATE ROAD A -1 —A -- — — — — — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - v I S R 1 T� I lVl r� I I .. y a two® A DDMM s FENWATM AT-. JEREMY K. WALTER F s 3432 NORTH OCEAN BOULEVARD A R C H I T E C T S.L '" e ~ $ w w.11..0 ..u.rwm.n..nao. sal tl., lre •o.w.- swrsx- I�gle.0a.wvise -r. ssunleto G ...A�.Imm'Ai+ne.mm o CD o m d v+ ® �mM� C m W -n r --------- - - - - -- .. y a two® A DDMM s FENWATM AT-. JEREMY K. WALTER F s 3432 NORTH OCEAN BOULEVARD A R C H I T E C T S.L '" e ~ $ w w.11..0 ..u.rwm.n..nao. sal tl., lre •o.w.- swrsx- I�gle.0a.wvise -r. ssunleto G ...A�.Imm'Ai+ne.mm r. B (; a i p r� CC CD v C G'3 z n N 00 m_ N E3 m PROPOSED AMMON A FENOVATKM AT-. JEREMY K. WALTER r s 3432 NORTH OCEAN BOULEVARD A R C x I T E C T S.u.c ull.11.Y �IW lIOICNIIR,flaO� 601 Hvibg Utrt -Sd6. ti6 -fib, Flwfd.1H5!- P.56ll]0I610 v1.w�kw�l6mrtNlpLmm tl ,111111 , I III111 I III111 1 1 I I B I 1 I � I I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 — _ 5 i �I I 1_____________ 1 1 � 1 I 1 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I CD v C G'3 z n N 00 m_ N E3 m PROPOSED AMMON A FENOVATKM AT-. JEREMY K. WALTER r s 3432 NORTH OCEAN BOULEVARD A R C x I T E C T S.u.c ull.11.Y �IW lIOICNIIR,flaO� 601 Hvibg Utrt -Sd6. ti6 -fib, Flwfd.1H5!- P.56ll]0I610 v1.w�kw�l6mrtNlpLmm tl I 1 I 1 I I LJL-JLILILJLJLILILJLJLJLJL p ' I 1 � ' I ' ! ® ®® ® EDIT] ®� ®® I P �c ! i 14 6 ® ® ®® ! I y 1 6 i 1 i 0011 E I i g 11 110 i 1 I I I LJ—LL-Li 1 ' I I I I 92 y 1n j6� 1 C�Rg~ BR I I 1 1 ! I I 1 1 I I I ' 1 I HR9 11 p I 1 ' I 1 1 1 I I 1 i I i i i I ® 1 ® � ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑LIJ I I 1 ® I ' I yJy' jjpp 11 ' 1 I 7EB FIF 11 IA ! I ® 1 m ' 1 • ! 11 I i I s � ' i I i 1 � � ❑ ❑ ❑❑ 1 ® I all i i i i I l i CID 6 Q s I I I Q) Q) O I I 11 m PROPOCSM ADDnM a FOMATM AT JEREMY K. WALTER w o 3432 NORTH OCEAN BOULEVARD A R C x I T E C T S.. ' owllenl w.lzwmsm.now cm llalbge Drive- sweau- 1w11.. Ft.la. vase -r. ssunlmo .wn{k..11v.l[llllav®I lu -- 3 �M R i Y_ • I �i i ,\ ;f 4j I . sm-7 OIL Oe y 7 � �► f `♦ III l;� r s } 1 d ,'. Y � 'O(: I ' J � t m i _ � r _ w 1� . n I •1! f f �� . {, { r 'rw^ -. ... r. FAF . AMM AT I JEREMY K. WALTER 3432 RTH OCEAN BOULEVARD " r " r S �� C S �� ` ..I" . S �� I Tfrr'�� O e u a �� 1 mrn �� t 0 -M .t0 WY N.60 3X433 v a H 1 1/ $ N = ti c n C �� N 't CARTER &ASSOCIATES CLARK RESIDENCE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS INC. 3432 N. Ocean Blvd. Gullslream, FL cD ro C 74 N.E. 5th AVE. Delray Beach, FL 33483 g 6��.5 21��r R8 �c 38gg 3 Ca 0 �� _ p m3 J �1 6" C 3z�� g� C gig Rw gP`= m r 3 y3 F " r " r S �� C S �� ` ..I" . S �� I Tfrr'�� O e u a �� 1 mrn �� t 0 -M .t0 WY N.60 3X433 v a H 1 1/ $ �� D � oseo 't CARTER &ASSOCIATES CLARK RESIDENCE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS INC. 3432 N. Ocean Blvd. Gullslream, FL cD ro C 74 N.E. 5th AVE. Delray Beach, FL 33483 g 6��.5 21��r R8 �c 38gg 3 Ca 0 �� _ p m3 6" C 3z�� g� C gig Rw gP`= m r 3 y3 p X11 `s 3Y�� z 3R s x��bro 4uu ��' R RR ssa 06+ Au to Q b a 968+ z d I .8'0 7 7 V M u n vn roti x AM 13510N w ' y 198+ 03LNO07 ON SLQ7Artr,V) /H8 b o /L'6+ 'blb O/V d ��' 19T b 14 3 VY* F �" ,try nm n k p p 1O vi i p g, oLf) OZ "I O ,f1L I�� I m � 2 .09 In- O 3 I O L v r 91 p n a 4 NO /b8 m ti w n Ie .ZO� nA p n 09 1 0 7 OiV O�� o f �� I f ��d I l 5 1 0 7 s I N O 171 7 ZII r��L " ��S�� 7KJ.e��  -  - 3A d � 0'51 = SYIpIrU 1 g - - -- __SILZ= t 06r-1- M7/ /VA i]a Landscape Plans For: DESIGNED BY: CARTER &ASSOCIATES CLARK RESIDENCE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS INC. 3432 N. Ocean Blvd. Gullslream, FL cD ro C 74 N.E. 5th AVE. Delray Beach, FL 33483 m _ m 561- 272 -9621 email:dhclaincabellsoulh.nel LA. 831 TOWN OF GULF STREAM ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW AND PLANNING REPORT Application #: 015 -08 Owner: M/M Robert Wamser Address: 3541 Polo Drive Agent: Ken Weitz/ Vintage Building & Design Proposed: Construct five (5) additions to a non - conforming Gulf Stream Bermuda style one story single family dwelling. Improvement Approvals Requested: Land Clearing Permit To prepare the property for construction. Special Exception (1) To permit additions to the south side of an existing dwelling that extends an existing non - conforming wall which encroaches approximately 5' into the required 15' south side setback (Section 70 -75 (c)). Special Exception (2) To permit an addition to the north east corner of an existing dwelling that extends an existing non- conforming wall which encroaches approximately 5' into the required 15' north side setback (Section 70 -75 (c)) Special Exception (3) To permit 3 additions to an existing non - conforming dwelling which extends existing non - conforming walls that encroach approximately 5' into the required 30' combined setback. (Section 70 -75 (c)). Level 3 Architectural/Site Plan To permit the construction of a five (5) additions (1,286 SF), 3 of which extend existing non - conforming walls that will encroach an additional 5' into the required 15' side setbacks, to an existing no- conforming Gulf Stream Bermuda style, one story, single family dwelling. Gross Lot size: 15,775 SF Effective Lot Area: 15,775 SF Permitted Floor Area: 5,205 SF Proposed Total Floor Area: 4,566 SF Zoning District: RS -C: GS Core Proposed Height: 16'; Preferred <_ 20' Finished Floor Elevation: 6.98'NGVD Base Flood Elevation: 7.0' Adjacent Residences: Gulf Stream Proposed: Gulf Stream Bermuda Bermuda Considered During Review: Section 66 -144 Standards: Regarding Level II & III architectural/ site plan review Section 70-4 How to use this manual: Regarding Design Standards Section 70 -71 Floor area ratios. Architectural Review and Planning Board ARPB File #015 -08 July 23, 2015 Page 2 Section 70 -7 (c ) Special exception. Additions to structures with existing nonconforming setbacks. Note: Standards of approval for special exception appear to be met. Section 70 -98 Building For Section 70 -100 Roof and Eave Heights; Staff Recommendation: Motion to Recommend Approval of a clearing permit. Motion to Recommend Approval of a Special Exception (1) to permit additions to the south side of an existing dwelling that extends an existing nonconforming wall which encroaches approximately 5' into the required 15' south side setback (Section 70 -75 (c)). Motion to Recommend Approval of a Special Exception (2) to permit an addition to the north east corner of an existing dwelling that extends an existing nonconforming wall which encroaches approximately 5' into the required 15' north side setback (Section 70 -75 (c)). Motion to Recommend Approval of a Special Exception (3) to permit 3 additions to an existing non - conforming walls that encroach approximately 5' into the required 30' combined setback (Section 70 -75 (c)). Motion to Recommend Approval of a Level 3 Architectural/ Site Plan Review based on the findings that the proposed construction of 5 additions (1,286 SF), 3 which extend existing nonconforming walls that will encroach an additional 5' into the required 15' side setbacks, to an existing nonconforming Gulf Stream Bermuda style, one story, single family dwelling meet the minimum intent of the Design Manual and applicable review standards with the following conditions: 1. The electric service lines shall be buried if not already. 2. Any minor modifications in the landscape plan shall be submitted to the Town Manager for review and approval and any major modifications shall be brought back to the ARPB for review and approval, prior to commencement of landscaping. 3. All landscaping shall be planted on private property only. Any existing landscape materials on Town's Right -of -Way shall be removed and /or transplanted to private property ARPB Date: July 23, 2015 Action: Clearing Permit: Special Exception (1): Special Exception (2): Special Exception (3): Level 3 Architectural /Site Plan Review: Architectural Review and Planning Board ARPB File #015 -08 July 23, 2015 Page 3 Town Commission: August 14, 2015 Action: Clearing Permit: Special Exception (1): Special Exception (2): Special Exception (3): Level 3 Architectural /Site Plan Review: Town of Gulf Stream TOWN OF GULF STREAM a RECEIVED 4 JUN -8 2015 Town of Gulfstream, F'. APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL This form is to be used for all development review applications to be heard by the Town of Gulf Stream Architectural Review and Planning Board, Board of Adjustment, and /or Town Commission. To complete the form properly, please review the accompanying Town of Gulf Stream Instruction Manual for Application for Development Review Form. Failure to complete this form properly will delay its consideration. ARPB File # To be completed by all applicants. PART II. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Project Information I.A.I. Project/Owner N I.A.2. Project Address: I.A.3. Project Properly Legal Description: ?L 2 NO fl e(.13 U" -1 $ L4,% I.A.4. Project Description (describe in detail, including # of stories, etc.) arirll� !�incluoiQ I.A.5. Square Footage of New Structure or Addition: Architectural Style: E ervv� ud0. 1.A.6. Check all that apply: d Architectural /Site Plan Review ❑ Land Clearing ❑ North Ocean Boulevard Overlay (complete section B) ❑ Demolition of Structures ❑ Non - residential uses ❑ Variance (complete section G) V Special Exception (complete section .E) 1.A.7. (a) Proposed F.F.E.: 1^,,�,1,,,�';,y,�•: Type of Foundation: -+-C• B. Owner Information I.B.I. Owner Address: -3-5 i( �lO DIAW ql1 xjk -- r n l/l ltiv 331 ($3 I.B.2. Owner Phone Number: q 1-A '' t Fax 1.8.3. Owner Signalure�— � ��'j, C. Agent Information t - " �1. 1 I.C.1. Agent Name and Firm Name: VIDA VA V lh p 1�d1 I.C.2. Agent Address: 900 Or oV 8(vd. Saike g1s 1)elvan cA.1, 33ugz I.C.3. Agent LSignature: ne Number: (o)5Q. 211' 5dq cell 7ol- �Iro -$y$H Fax �' CIU" 1.C.4. Agent Official Use Only Pre -App Date: ARPB Date: App Date: Recommendation: -- Corn Date: TC Date: - -- Decision: ,+ "I I W n rnr�a a 6 9 - i Application for Development Approval Form ADA.2000 revised 6 /13 /00 Page 2 Town of Gulf Stream PART III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION To be completed by all applicants after pre- application conference with Town Staff. Please be concise but brief Attach additional sheets only when necessary and be sure to include the appropriate and complete question number for each response. A. Project Description and Justification III.A.1. In what zoning district is the project site located? �S C 5 --1!! III.A.2. Is the project compatible with the intent of the zoning district? 1XYes ❑ No III.Fl.3. Is the project consistent w' Comprehensive Pla h the Future Land Use Map and goals, objectives and policies of the n? les ❑ No Explain. III.A.4. Flow are ingress and egress to the property to be provided? III.A.5. How are the following utilities to be provided to the property? a. Stormwater Drainage au am - exis" b. Sanitary Sewer C. Potable Water d. Irrigation Water e. Electricity f. Telephone g. Gas h. Cable Television ,� the structures are III.A.6. If the project involves the erection of one or more structures, please describe how consistent with the criteria in Section 66 -144 of the Town of Gulf Stream Code. (Attach additional sheet if necessary.) no PART IV. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Section A is to be completed by all applicants after pre - application conference with Town staff. Answering "Yes "to any question in Section A requires the completion of additional Sections as indicated. A. Additional Approvals /Requirements IV.A.1. Does the project involve land area within fifty feet (50') of the A1A (North Ocean Boulevard) right -of- way? ❑ Yes 9?190 (If "Yes ", section B of this part must he completed.) IV-A.2. Does the project involve the demolition of one or more structures? ❑ Yes ISlo (If "Yes ", section C of this part must be completed.) IV.A.3. Does the project involve the clearing or filling of any portion of an existing vacant lot or more than fifty percent (50 %) of the landscaped area of a developed lot? ❑ Yes ISK (If "Yes ", section D of this part must be completed.) IV.A.5. D�ofm� the project require approval of a Special Exception? 'Yes ❑ No (If "Yes ", section E of this part must be completed.) IV.A.6. 's IF- proffer at variance with any regulations contained in the Zoning Code? f3Yes 1Vo (If "Yes ", section G of this part must be completed.) Application for Development Approval Form ADA.32000 Page 3 �� c0111 E" Projects Requiring a Spacial Exception. t�� IV.E.1. Is the proposed use a permitted special IV. -, exception use? E 2" How is the use designed o q iVo '73- -- g located Code Sertion: c' welfare, and morals and proposed to he o will be protected? Aerated so that the Public health, safely, LC/Lt��4..nlu/t[.`tZ`�� IV.E.3. Will (he use cause subs) be located? Q' yes , dial injury to the value of other ro 'o wo P periy in the neighborhood Explain. where it is to IV.E.q. How will the use be compatible with adjoining development and the character of the District where it v��IIY_ IV-E.5. What landscaping and screening are provided? S'rI IV.E.6. Does the us conform with all applicable regulations located? Efyes Q' No governing the District wherein it is to be Explain. F. Non - Residential Projects and Residential Projects of Greater than 2 Units IVY-1. If common area facilities are to be provided, describe them and how they are to be maintained. IV.F,2. If recreation facilities are to be provided, describe them and their potential impacts on surrounding Properties. IV.F.3. For each of the following, list the number provided and their dimensions. Loading spaces: Standard Parking Spaces: Small Car Parking Spaces: Handicapped Parking Spaces: Driveways /Aisles; Application for Development Approval Form ADA.32000 Page 5 I ur gulf Stream H- Projects Requiring Rezoning IV.f -1.1. What is the Future Land Use designation of the project site? IV.H.2. If the project involves a rezoning, Comprehensive Plan text change, o oan g Code text change, Future Land Use justification for the request. Y combination thereof, Map change, Please describe the need and PART V. OPTIONAL INFORMATION This additionfalrele ant information regarding g the Project t thattwas not covered elsewhere on this t /he other materials submitted with the application. required to provide any form or on any of a/1 c_ '- P7Tte Application for Development Approval Form ADA.2000 revised 0/8100 I Page 7 V I N T A G E B U I L D I N G A N D D E S 1 G N June 10, 2015 Town of Gulfstream Application for Development Approval 100 Sea Road Gulf Stream, FL 33483 Re: Wamser Residence (3541 Polo Drive, Gulf Stream) To Whom It May Concern, As the Section 70 -75 Special Exception Setbacks code states: "Where the addition to the structure is a logical extension of the existing floor plan in terms of function and design," and "The location of the addition shall represent a logical extension of the existing structure and shall be consistent with all applicable design standards ", the following encroachments as explained below will prove to fall under these allowances: The present front set back of 30' is not being encroached upon. The south side set back, which is presently 15', is encroaching the former 10' setback by approximately 5' in both the southeast (closet addition) and southwest (bedroom addition) comers of the residence. These represent a logical extension of the existing structure. The north side set back, which is presently 15', is encroaching the former 10' setback by approximately 5' in the northwest corner (garage extension). These represent a logical extension of the existing structure. The lanai extension in the northeast corner is currently shown on the plans as encroaching by 2 ". We will reduce this encroachment on the final plans to delete this encroachment. The final structure will not encroach the set back. Sincerely, d Ken Weitz Principle, Vintage Building and Design 200 Lindell Boulevard, Suite 919, Delray Beach, FL 33483 P 561- 716 -8454 • F 561- 932 -1722 • www.vintagebd.net • CGC#034794 N J m N A Ol J m N a m Qr D g 'Do L POLO DRIVE 9 'F- O � m Comm ro D C o c t✓ n ::11 mm m n w S m N ''� — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — J H D t✓ O w — — — 20' -0• REM SETBACK I CD �o�y m �n ,J bm bba bm m b 0 � 0 O M �' � � g o y b b � a I b• 'b cl K a4 m m �oz � S .— _.__._ —.__.1 ggn p 4 f n d n � O n Cd � ro xy w 14L�.� O o F3 m e a i e4i i a m i i i i V� J a y� a H m m b H � x z+ � z x$ z z m a # O II J V •] rd N J m N A Ol J m N a m Qr D g 'Do L POLO DRIVE 9 O O � m Comm ro D C o p n T . 0 w 0 m N a -009 u,ZAZO 00> — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — J y D _ < O /rfm,�� — — — 20' -0• REM SETBACK I CD �o�y I SSm n S � 0 0 0 0 -n r A -4 I so I D cl 96�- �S-0' NllfY El�°HENf _�— �oz .— _.__._ —.__.1 ggn p 4 f n d ra � n Cd � N J m N A Ol J m N a m Qr D g 'Do L POLO DRIVE 9 �F529 A � � m Comm ro D C o p gy T . 0 0 m a -009 u,ZAZO 00> — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — J y D _ < /rfm,�� — — — 20' -0• REM SETBACK I CD �o�y I SSm I E3 0 EP_�d a _ MPosm aDomoN a FEN(yvATK)M AT.. JEREMY K. WALTER H p 8, 's 3541 POLO DRIVE ARCHITECTS,=': E q �� mwnuu •uu�nrmxn.wno. mllleluyegtv.- SWie4M- I�NIn.Flmid.1H5!- r.sel]n1Em ail0 co m I x �t — — — 4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — J y _ < — — — 20' -0• REM SETBACK I CD o "' I I E3 0 -n r A -4 I so I IL._ 96�- �S-0' NllfY El�°HENf _�— .— _.__._ —.__.1 4 a _ MPosm aDomoN a FEN(yvATK)M AT.. JEREMY K. WALTER H p 8, 's 3541 POLO DRIVE ARCHITECTS,=': E q �� mwnuu •uu�nrmxn.wno. mllleluyegtv.- SWie4M- I�NIn.Flmid.1H5!- r.sel]n1Em -- - - - - - - -- - --------- - - - - -- i I ----- - - - - -- � I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I � p c I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I pI I I I j I I I I HL -- --- - -- DID -- I Oil zi V � I I � I I I I I I I I I I I p3 I I 4 I I I I I I ti I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 0 I I 1 I I It'4 p� p� I I _ p� I I .O O V 1I � Fol o , G) z n --'----'----'-- -- '-- --'- --- '------- -'- -'- - --' y - ' �.l �- 6 (D G E3 Lrl " A a HT ADDff r a RENOVAT"M AT JEREMY K. WALTER 3541 POLO DRIVE ARCHITECTS.Lu mr�W wtlmamnr.noa 601 Haiuge 0rirt -Salle lY- 1�pI1a,Fl°M.1,15e- P.561]A1510 Ypq� 4 O 1,0110: I ® ®I MOP ''® ®, Li i I i I i i i i 0 �❑ 00❑ � oo❑ oo❑ i 54$ I i I Wit co P� € LE o � a I a� z °° m o C m Cil v a a ; ; PRCPOSED ADDMON A FENovA7KM AT. JEREMY K. WALTER i� 3541 POLO DRIVE t A R C H I T E C T S.uc R; Ho °�� r�rwlmencnaoe Wi Hoiebe verve -sale ll6- �Yr11C. Flmidal'1958- P.561]A]614 R �.�. �wel�uNanvmm if �II ■.....■ III Iii 817 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ VIII ■ ■ ■. N ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ III N ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■■ �I' Jill j i k4t�' Vr O+ i I I I I I I I I I I I I I � I � � I I I 4 C3 � G Z ` y r71 W ^� < ° m C." v T r i bs y o e 5 F PROPOSED ADOMO I n FENOVATKM AT-. JEREMY K. WALTER 3541 POLO DRIVE ARCHITECTS. 'S^ HP wwiwir rrrr�wm^^.^oa lUI IIo1bBUNe- SJb4M -��M, flmfd�3 M -I'. MI3n l., B I� IIIIIIIIIIIIAIIIIII 91111111111A111m IIIIIIIIAAIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII �t I I � I � � I I I 4 C3 � G Z ` y r71 W ^� < ° m C." v T r i bs y o e 5 F PROPOSED ADOMO I n FENOVATKM AT-. JEREMY K. WALTER 3541 POLO DRIVE ARCHITECTS. 'S^ HP wwiwir rrrr�wm^^.^oa lUI IIo1bBUNe- SJb4M -��M, flmfd�3 M -I'. MI3n l., B e t v L6 JAME n r N 4 if t �l �� �.•� se b s • ,. i _ .,y •F • ,Ak WON � a • -r - Sl t �< 4 a, B-� 3 6� O 44 2 3� m6 m ji _Q b$$R 4 m gin 2 R R m ) 0 0 y �R �o 9 I � [Its F1 f1 �Pt 6 � y i � 1 a ;11111 pt 1 -€ ga s =�1p� d E � x S I i 3 S s g y fig§ :tika `8cyv °v x A a §` r 0 lit m i a �s R a$° s _ aka s e 2 9 I I I I I I I 1 I I I —� I I I � I I I I I 1I I\ I yypp1 I 3N I � p8. S a Y 9¢8 R 53 H E POLO DRIVE I � I I 1 I I I } 1 i m r^' 11 g E OF eta E I I _I I I I I I ( I I � i I I I � I i 21 —e' REAR S6M E:K ok I I I 6�- i _____ ______ ______ ___________ `s-P I,R,r•r EASE1Em� 1 ID M �C Landscape Plans For: 0 3541 POLO DRa N Gulfslream, Fl. m O m Cil -n r DESIGNED BY: CARTER & ASSOCIATES LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS INC. 74 N.E. 5th AVE. Delray Beach, R 33483 561 -272 -9621 dhc inc@bebouthnef LA. 831 R S R B i P s CHANGES TO GULF STREAM CODE FOR TWO STORY HOMES IN CORE, PLACE AU SOLEIL AND NORTH /SOUTH DISTRICTS The town commissioners and the mayor have assigned the ARPB to examine ways to discourage the construction of 2 story homes. In the May meeting we decided not to reduce FAR percentages because "the problem is not so much with the size of the building, but the form of the building ". Ways to reduce the appearance of mass were discussed at the May meeting, and recommendation was made to continue discussion at the June meeting. Section 70 -74 SETBACKS 1) Increase Front Yard Setback to 35' for 2 story portions of 2 story houses. - Single story setback remains at 30' 2) Establish 2nd Story Side Setback: based on the width of the 1st story, Manual currently limits 2nd story floor Square footage to 70% of 1st floor. There are no guidelines for Linear footage across front elevation. Recommend the ARPB establish one of two solutions: a)A fixed number, i.e. 2nd story must be setback at least 101from the 1st story walls, or, b)A variable number based on a % of the width of the 1st story. The means to calculate the 2nd story setback is important because the Code provides formulas for architects to calculate: a) Property Setbacks b) Second Story square footage (70% of 1st floor square footage) c) FAR Floor Area Ratio to establish allowable square footage Yet the guidance for 2 story house massing is arbitrary leaving "Building forms with central massing" to be interpreted by the architect, town staff, ARPB members, and town commissioners in a myriad of different ways. In the May meeting Mr. Wietsma, a highly respected architect in the recent history of Gulf Stream stated he "felt some setbacks for the second stories, at least 10 feet, should be considered, and some restrictions put in place to prevent structures that have a block like appearance ". Option b) dovetails perfectly with the calculation of the Property Side Yard Setback. The calculation would be made the same way as the Side yard setback: Setback for 1st story = Lot width x 30 %. Minimum Setback 15' Setback for 2nd story = 1st story x 30 %. Minimum Setback 10' (10' minimum setback for the 2nd story should be 10' to give architects greater flexibility in the positioning of the 2nd story over the 1st story.) The closest the 2nd story could be built to a side property line is 25' and 30' to a roadway using the above formula. 3) Establish a section for 2nd stories with FAR less than 20% of total FAR There are numerous small second story structures in the districts under review. These consist mostly of guest rooms placed above garages, and are usually added years after the original single story house is built. While these structures do not conform with the "central massing" called 5 for in the code, because of their small size, generally 10 - 200 of the total FAR, they are "harmonious" with the character of districts currently under review. To give architects greater flexibility, and to encourage single story homes with very modest 2nd stories, I recommend we create an additional section to address "2nd Story structures where the 2nd story FAR is less than 200 of the total FAR" That section would allow for 1) Placement of 2nd stories outside the setbacks established for large 2nd stories. 2) Minimum Setback of 25' from any roadway. 3) Maximum eve height 20' Attorney Randolph suggested that a dis- incentive to constructing a two story house would be to require that the entire structure have an additional 5 foot setback plus the existing 700 of the ls' floor square footage. Both Mr. Kent and Mr. Thrasher believed that would result in the structure having the appearance of a flat "block ". Mr. Thrasher favored having a maximum measurement for a plane before a break to provide some articulation in the front.