HomeMy Public PortalAbout2021-05-19 packetIndividuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as
required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request.
Please call (573) 634-6410 with questions regarding agenda items.
Board of Directors
Wednesday, May 19, 2021 at 12:00 p.m.
Meeting Location: Council Chambers, John G. Christy Municipal Building
320 E. McCarty, Jefferson City, MO 65101 - Enter through Main Lobby
VIRTUAL OPTION
TO JOIN VIRTUALLY: CLICK HERE
CALL-IN AVAILABLE AT: 1-404-397-1516
MEETING NUMBER: 187 171 1116 MEETING PASSWORD: 1234
All interested parties will be given the opportunity to be heard.
TENTATIVE AGENDA
1. Call to order, roll call, and determination of a quorum
2. Adoption of the agenda as printed or amended
3. Approval of the minutes from the meeting of April 21, 2021
4. Public comment
5. Communications Received
6. New Business
A. 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) - DRAFT
Action Requested: Review, discussion, and approval of the 2022-2026 TIP
Staff Report: The 2022-2026 TIP is a 5-year financial program of transportation projects to be implemented
within the Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA), which are funded by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), or are deemed “regionally significant”. The TIP is updated annually by
CAMPO in cooperation with local jurisdictions, the Missouri Department of Transportation, and local public
transportation operators.
B. FY 2022 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) - DRAFT
Action Requested: Review, discussion, and approval of the FY2022 Unified Planning Work Program
Staff Report: The FY 2022 UPWP is CAMPO’s annual statement of work identifying the budget, planning
priorities, and activities to be carried out for the year (November 1 to October 31). The UPWP contains many
ongoing activities required to perform the essential functions of CAMPO, as well as, periodic and one-time
activities. The UPWP serves as the basis for funding agreements with the Missouri Department of Transportation
(MoDOT).
C. 2021 Coordinated Public Transit – Human Services Transportation Plan (Coordinated Plan)- DRAFT
Action Requested: Review, discussion, and approval of the 2021 Coordinated Plan
Staff Report: The Coordinated Plan is a locally developed transportation plan that provides an overview of current
conditions, capacities, and goals as they pertain to public transportation in the CAMPO region. The plan is updated
at least every four to five years per federal regulations.
7. Other Business
A. Status of Current Work Tasks
B. Announcements
8. Next Meeting Date – Wednesday, June 16, 2021 at 12:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, City of Jefferson City Hall
9. Adjournment
Capital Area Metropolitan
Planning Organization
Room 120 320 E. McCarty, Jefferson City, MO 65101 Phone 573.634.6410 Fax 573.634.6457
Minutes/Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Board of Directors
April 21, 2021 1
MINUTES
Board of Directors
CAPITAL AREA M ETROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION
April 21, 2021
12:00 p.m.
BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT
Ron Fitzwater, Chairman, Jefferson City
Jon Hensley, Jefferson City
Jeff Hoelscher, Vice Chairman, Cole County
Eric Landwehr, Cole County
Mark Mehmert, Jefferson City
Doug Reece, St. Martins, Small Cities Representative
Sonny Sanders, Jefferson City
Bob Lynch, MoDOT
Mike Lester, Jefferson City
Hank Vogt, Jefferson City
Roger Fischer, Callaway County – unable to vote due remote participation
BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT
Matt Morasch, Jefferson City
Hannah Thomas, Holt Summit
EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS PRESENT (Non-Voting)
Michael Henderson, MoDOT
Marty Wilson, Callaway County Economic Development Interest
EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS ABSENT (Non-Voting)
Randy Allen, Jefferson City Chamber of Commerce
Cathy Monroe, FTA
Brad McMahon, FHWA
Cathy Brown, Missouri Office of Administration
CAMPO STAFF PRESENT (Non-Voting)
Eric Barron, Planning Manager
Beth Sweeten, Administrative Assistant
Lee Bowden, Planner
Katrina Williams, Planner
Ali Lewis, Planning Intern
GUEST
1. Call to order, roll call, and determination of a quorum.
Chairman Fitzwater called the meeting to order at 12:00 p.m.
Ms. Sweeten took roll call. A quorum was present with 10 of 13 members present. Mr. Fischer was
not counted towards the quorum due to his remote participation being audio only.
2. Public Comment
No comments were received.
3. Adoption of the agenda as printed or amended
Mr. Lester moved and Mr. Landwehr seconded to adopt the agenda. The motion passed
unanimously.
4. Approval of the minutes from the meeting of February 17, 2021
Mr. Mehmert moved and Mr. Lester seconded to approve the minutes from the Regular Meeting of
February 17, 2021 as printed. The motion passed unanimously.
5. Communications Received
Minutes/Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Board of Directors
April 21, 2021 2
No Communication was received.
6. Staff Presentation – Unfunded Needs Meeting
Mr. Barron gave a presentation of the recent MoDOT Unfunded Needs Meeting he attended. He
highlighted projects that CAMPO staff submitted to MoDOT to be included in the 2021 Statewide
Unfunded Needs List. These projects included the following: Expansion of US54/63 north of the
Missouri River Bridge; Improvements to the Rex Whitton Expressway; Major highway interchanges
(US 50/Truman Blvd, US 54/Simon Blvd, and US 54/Ellis Blvd.).
7. New Business
A. A. Proposed Amendment #2 of 2021-2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
- MoDOT project 5P3405, Guard Cable & Guardrail Repair.
Mr. Bowden stated that MoDOT has applied for an amendment to the 2021-2025 Transportation
Improvement Program (TIP). The amendment includes a change to MoDOT project 5P3405 (2018-
06), Guard Cable & Guardrail Repair in Northern Central District. The project total $2,142,000 and
is funded at 80% through the FHWA STBG funds and 20% through MoDOT TCOS funds. The
project, will be completed in program year 2021.
He said the Technical Committee has reviewed the proposed TIP Amendment at their meeting on
April 1th and voted to open a public comment period and recommend approval by the Board of
Directors.
Mr. Reece moved and Mr. Landwehr seconded to close the public comment period and approve
the TIP Amendment. A roll call vote was conducted and the motion passed unanimously.
B. 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) - DRAFT
Mr. Bowden stated that the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a 5-year financial
program of transportation projects to be implemented within the Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA),
which are funded by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit
Administration (FTA), or are deemed “regionally significant”. The TIP is updated annually by
CAMPO in cooperation with local jurisdictions, the Missouri Department of Transportation, and local
public transportation operators.
Mr. Bowden said staff has worked extensively with local jurisdictions, public transportation
providers, and MoDOT to demonstrate fiscal constraint and show projects in the CAMPO region
for the next five program years. All jurisdictions active with CAMPO have consulted with staff to
ensure financial details and projects are correct and appropriate. The Technical Committee
reviewed and recommended on April 1, 2021 to forward the Draft 2022-2026 TIP to the Board of
Directors for review and approval. A 25-day public comment period will be opened April 21st and
close May 18th. Any comments received will be presented at the Board of Directors meeting May
19th.
Mr. Reece moved and Mr. Landwehr seconded to open a 25-day public comment period for the
Draft 2022-2026 TIP. A roll call vote was conducted and the motion passed unanimously.
C. FY 2022 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) - DRAFT
Ms. Williams explained that the UPWP is CAMPO’s annual statement of work identifying the
budget, planning priorities, and activities to be carried out for the year (November 1 to October 31).
The UPWP contains many ongoing activities required to perform the essential functions of CAMPO,
as well as, periodic and one-time activities. The UPWP serves as the basis for funding agreements
with the Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT).
She gave an overview of the contents of the UPWP, including work task to be completed in 2022
and the anticipated budget. She also gave an overview of the Consolidated Planning Grant and
reviewed the pool of funds that are available for larger planning activities or studies. stated that
staff has developed a draft FY2022 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP).
Minutes/Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Board of Directors
April 21, 2021 3
Mr. Reece moved and Mr. Landwehr seconded to open a 25-day public comment period for the
Draft FY2022 Unified Planning Work Program .
Mr. Sanders asked about the status of the Transit Facility Feasibility Study and whether it would
run into 2022. Mr. Mehmert stated that the work would be completed in FY 2021. A roll call vote
was conducted and the motion passed unanimously.
D. 2021 Coordinated Public Transit – Human Services Transportation Plan (Coordinated
Plan)- DRAFT
Ms. Williams stated that staff has produced a draft update of the Coordinated Public Transit –
Human Services Transportation Plan (Coordinated Plan). The Coordinated Plan is required to be
updated every four to five years. The last update was completed in 2017 and the current update
process is anticipated to conclude in April of 2021. The plan outlies current conditions,
capacities, needs, and strategies as they relate to transit in the CAMPO region. Participation in
the plan is required for agencies seeking to apply for FTA 5310 funds.
She stated that the Technical Committee reviewed and recommended on April 1, 2021 to forward
the plan to the Board of Directors for review and approval.
Mr. Landwehr moved and Mr. Reece seconded to open a 25-day public comment period for the
Draft 2021 Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan. A roll call vote was
conducted and the motion passed unanimously.
8. Other Business
A. Status of current work tasks
Ms. Williams gave a brief update on the status of the following items:
• FY 2022 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) development. Staff is nearing
finalization on the process of updating the UPWP.
• 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) development. Staff is nearing
finalization on the process of updating the TIP.
• Jefferson City Data Assistance. Staff is working with other Jefferson City planners in
providing data and mapping assistance in the update of the of the City’s Comprehensive
Plan. The plan is anticipated to be adopted in June.
• Local Street Classification Update. Staff has completed an update of local street
classifications throughout City of Jefferson and Cole County as part of the Thoroughfare
Plan development for the City of Jefferson.
• Major Thoroughfare Plan Development. Staff continues work on the Major
Thoroughfare Plan in conjunction with the development of the Jefferson City
Comprehensive Plan. The Major Thoroughfare Plan will be developed through
stakeholder input and will pull directly from the 2018 Travel Demand Model.
• JEFFTRAN Transit Facility Feasibility Study RFQ. An RFQ was advertised in March
with one submission received. Jefferson City Public Works staff is currently in discussion
with the consultant.
B. Announcements – Mr. Sanders announced that there is an opening on the CAMPO
Technical Committee for someone with interest in bicycle and pedestrian issues.
9. Next Meeting Date – Wednesday, May 19, 2021
10. Adjournment
Mr. Lester moved and Mr. Reece seconded to adjourn the meeting at 12:55 p.m. The motion
passed unanimously.
Respectfully Submitted,
Beth Sweeten, Administrative Assistant
Agenda Item 6A Page 1 of 4
CAMPO Board of Directors Staff Report
2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program Update
May 19, 2021
Summary
The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a 5-year financial program of transportation projects to
be implemented within the Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA). Projects in the program are funded by the
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), and are deemed
‘regionally significant.’ The TIP is updated annually by CAMPO in cooperation with local jurisdictions,
the Missouri Department of Transportation, and local public transportation operators.
TIP Development
The CAMPO TIP year runs from July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022. The current 5-year TIP includes 36 projects
that total $101,457,656 dollars programed in the 2022-2026 TIP. The TIP discusses federal performance
measure targets that have been reviewed by the CAMPO Technical Committee and passed by the Board of
Directors. Updated financial data for the jurisdictions within the CAMPO region are used to demonstrate
fiscal constraint, which is the availability of local matching funds for federal transportation dollars from
FHA or FTA. Additionally, the TIP contains the Program of Projects that public transportation agencies are
required to create. The Program of Projects consists of projects and costs as well as an illustrative project
list for JEFFTRAN.
Federal Performance Measures
FTA and MoDOT set the Federal and State Performance Measures each year. The CAMPO Technical
Committee reviews these performance measures and the Board of Directors provide approval of the
measures. These Federal and State Performance Measures are required to be put in each years TIP. One
of the key parts of these performance measures is Safety. MoDOT’s Safety Targets are based on Zero by
2030 fatality reduction, Zero by 2040 serious injury reduction, 1% VMT increase, and non-motorized
reduction based on overall fatality and serious injury reductions. In this year’s TIP $36,654,000 dollars are
programmed for safety projects. Another part of the performance measures is transit asset management,
which has $13,566,012 dollars programed in this year’s TIP. The performance measures also include
maintaining roadway and bridge conditions. There is $43,710,000 dollars programmed in this year’s TIP
for pavement and bridge projects. There is a total of $101,457,656 dollars programmed in this year’s TIP,
that includes $94,972,295 dollars in future funding and $6,485,361 in prior project funding.
Financial Plan
As part of the Financial Plan section, each year staff reaches out to the local jurisdictions in the CAMPO
region to collect financial data that is required to be included in the TIP. Part of this financial data includes
general tax revenue and local operating assistance, but can also include FTA grants. The 5-year total
available funds for all local jurisdictions total is $352,817,275 dollars for 2022-2026. That includes
$4,277,284 in FTA 5307 funds, $112,000 in 5339 funds, and $1,183,402 in FTA 5310 funds. The rest is
from MoDOT, FHWA, and local jurisdiction budgets.
Operations and Maintenance
Included in the financial data that staff collected from the local jurisdictions are Operations and
Maintenance costs. Operations and Maintenance costs are the expenditures it takes for each jurisdiction to
maintain the current roadway system. This includes personnel and contractual services, utilities, materials
and supplies, and repair and maintenance costs. Each jurisdiction provides these costs within their financial
data. These numbers are used with the number of lane miles per jurisdiction to get an estimated cost per
lane mile. Statewide, MoDOT has a maintenance cost per lane mile of $5,137 dollars. Our local
jurisdictions see a cost per lane mile very similar to the statewide cost per lane mile, some being a little
more and some a little less per lane mile. The total of all Operations and Maintenance costs for all of our
local jurisdictions is $252,230,714 dollars for 2022-2026, based upon local budgets.
Agenda Item 6A Page 2 of 4
Financial Constraint
Additionally, in this year’s TIP each jurisdiction has to show a Demonstration of Fiscal Constraint. By
utilizing revenue numbers and the operations and maintenance costs we can show Financial Constraint
calculations for each jurisdiction. This is accomplished by showing the total revenue numbers and
subtracting the operation and maintenance costs and the TIP commitment to show either a positive (fiscally
constrained) number, or a negative number. The TIP commitment is the amount of money a local
jurisdiction has committed to a project that is in the TIP. At this time there are no jurisdictions that have a
commitment for a project in this year’s TIP. The City of Jefferson and Transit providers show TIP
commitments for their operating assistance and Transit projects. All jurisdictions have shown that they are
fiscally constrained in this year’s TIP. This is important for each jurisdiction in the future if they intend to
have a federally funded transportation project that would need to be listed in the TIP.
Fiscally Constrained Transportation Projects
One of the most important parts of the TIP is the projects that are listed in it. Most of the projects are
MoDOT sponsored and are also listed in the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). We
classify TIP projects into 5 categories, Road, Bridge, Pedestrian, Transit, and Other.
Road – There are 8 projects listed in the Road category in this year’s TIP. These projects are for
maintenance, repairs, improvements to several roadways throughout the CAMPO region, and 2 system
expansion projects. The total of these 8 projects is $42,290,000 dollars. Although, 4 of the 8 Road projects
extend beyond the CAMPO region borders. These 4 projects make up $24,396,000 dollars of the
$42,290,000 dollars programmed in the Road category.
Bridge - This year there are 13 projects listed in the Bridge category that includes several bridge repairs
and maintenance projects in the CAMPO region. These 13 projects have a total cost of $15,698,000 dollars.
Pedestrian - Pedestrian projects are all upgrades to pedestrian facilities. These 3 projects extend beyond
the CAMPO region throughout various locations in Central District. The 3 pedestrian projects total up to
$25,132,000 dollars.
Transit - Transit projects are for our various transit organizations within our CAMPO region, most of
which includes operating assistance. These 7 projects total up to $17,866,656.
Other - There are 5 projects in the “other” category that include scoping, surveying, and traffic studies at
various locations in the region and throughout Central District. Only 2 of the 5 projects are designated for
specific locations in the CAMPO region. The 5 projects total up to $471,000 dollars, of that, $70,000
dollars are designated for the 2 projects that are specified in the CAMPO region.
These 5 categories make up the 36 projects totaling $101,457,656 dollars, which includes $94,972,295
dollars in future funding and $6,485,361 in prior project funding. Of that total, $49,929,000 is programed
for projects that extend beyond the CAMPO region. Attached is a spreadsheet containing the projects that
are programmed in the 2022-2026 TIP.
Public Comment
A 25-day public comment period was opened by the Board of Directors on April 21st and needs to be closed
by the Board of Directors meeting on May 19th, after which the TIP can be approved.
Comments Received
Staff received comments from MoDOT and Dion Knipp at OAT’s. MoDOT had no regulatory comments
just best practice comments that will be addressed in the 2023-2027 TIP. Dion Knipp with OAT’s requested
a change in funding source. Changes were made in funding source labels, although dollar amounts
remained the same.
Staff Recommendation
Staff has worked extensively with local jurisdictions, public transportation providers, and MoDOT to
demonstrate fiscal constraint and show projects in the CAMPO region for the next five program years. All
jurisdictions active with CAMPO have consulted with staff to ensure financial details and projects are
correct and appropriate.
Recommended Form of Motion:
Motion to close the public comment period and adopt the 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement
Program.
Agenda Item 6A Page 3 of 4
Fiscally Constrained Transportation Projects
Class Project Name TIP #MoDOT #Total Project Cost
1 Bridge Bridge Rehabilitation On US 50 Over Osage River 2019-02 5P2190 $413,000
2 Bridge Bridge Improvements over Rte. 54 and Rte. 94 2022-03 5S3458 $2,187,000
3 Bridge Bridge Rehabilitation On US 50 over Moreau River 2022-05 5P3449 $344,000
4 Bridge Bridge Improvement On US 50 over Vetter Lane 2022-07 5P3523 $1,042,000
5 Bridge Bridge Improvement On US 54 over Missouri River 2022-08 5P3451 $82,000
6 Bridge Bridge Improvement on US 54 over McCarty Street and Rte. 50 2022-09 5P3467 $1,956,000
7 Bridge Bridge Improvement On US 54 over Bus. 50 2022-10 5P3525 $1,731,000
8 Bridge Bridge Improvement On US 54 over Neighorn Branch 2022-11 5P3560 $3,041,000
9 Bridge Bridge Improvement On RT B over Moreau River 2022-12 5S3464 $714,000
10 Bridge Bridge Improvement On TR D over North Moreau Creek 2022-13 5S3526 $1,125,000
11 Bridge Bridge Improvement on RP US 50 E to US 54 E over Rte. 50 2022-14 5P3459 $1,730,000
12 Bridge Bridge improvement On CST W Truman over Rte. 50 2022-15 5S3457 $930,000
13 Bridge Bridge Rehabilitation on US 50 over Osage River 2022-17 5P3442 $403,000
14 Road Pavement Improvements on US 63 2020-03 5P3409 $16,838,000
15 Road Roadway Improvements on US 54 2022-01 5P3497 $4,267,000
16 Road Interchange Improvements at Simon Boulevard and US 54 2022-02 5P3576 $4,661,000
17 Road Pavement improvements on MO 179 2022-04 5S3454 $6,106,000
18 Road Pavement improvements on US 50 2022-06 5P3453 $2,860,000
19 Road Pavement Resurfacing on MO 179 2022-16 5S3470 $2,341,000
20 Road Guard Cable & Guardrail Repair in Northern Central District 2022-22 5P3485 $2,422,000
21 Road Guard Cable & Guardrail Repair in Northern Central District 2022-23 5P3487 $2,795,000
22 Other Surveying 2018-08 5P3402 $45,000
23 Other Scoping Routes M, B & W 2013-16 5S2234 $54,000
24 Other Scoping on South Ten Mile Drive 2020-12 5S3418 $16,000
25 Other Traffic Safety Studies 2020-11 5S3421 $152,000
26 Other Scoping for Slide Repairs 2022-20 5S3503 $204,000
27 Pedestrian Updating Pedestrian Facilities 2022-18 5P3490 $1,591,000
28 Pedestrian Updating Pedestrian Facilities 2022-19 5S3546 $345,000
29 Pedestrian Updating Pedestrian Facilities 2020-16 5S3369 $23,196,000
30 Transit Operating Assistance 2011-04 $15,206,413
31 Transit Operating Assistance 2022-21 $700,000
32 Transit Transit Farecard System Replacement 2020-17 $100,000
33 Transit Replace Security Systems in Transit Facilities 2020-22 $40,000
34 Transit Capital Funding - Vehicles 2018-10 $140,000
35 Transit Operating Assistance 2018-11 $850,000
36 Transit Operating Assistance 2021-21 $830,243
101,457,656$ Project Total
Agenda Item 6A Page 4 of 4
Fiscally Constrained Transportation Projects Map
Transportation Improvement Program
Program Years 2022-2026
July 1, 2021 – June 30, 2026
Adopted XXXX
The preparation of this report was financed in part by the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration,
and Federal Transit Administration in cooperation with the Missouri Department of Transportation. The opinions, findings, and
conclusions expressed in this report are not necessarily those of the Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit
Administration, or the Missouri Department of Transportation.
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as
required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request.
Table of Contents
Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 1
Public Participation ................................................................................................................................. 2
Project Selection ...................................................................................................................................... 2
TIP Development ..................................................................................................................................... 2
TIP Amendments and Administrative Modifications ............................................................................... 3
Previous Projects ................................................................................................................................. 3
Annual Listing of Obligated Projects ...................................................................................................... 3
Air Quality Designation .......................................................................................................................... 3
Environmental Justice ............................................................................................................................. 3
Federal Performance Measures ............................................................................................................... 4
Financial Plan ......................................................................................................................................... 6
Forecast Revenue Available for Transportation Funding .................................................................... 6
Operations and Maintenance ............................................................................................................ 10
Financial Constraint .............................................................................................................................. 12
Demonstration of Fiscal Constraint ................................................................................................... 13
Fiscally Constrained Transportation Projects .................................................................................... 16
Multimodal Projects .............................................................................................................................. 38
Regionally Significant Projects ............................................................................................................. 38
Appendix 1 – Amendments and Administrative Modifications ............................................................ 39
Appendix 2 – Federal Funding Sources ................................................................................................ 40
Appendix 3 – Policies and Procedures ................................................................................................. 41
Appendix 4 – Definitions ...................................................................................................................... 44
CAMPO Title VI Nondiscrimination Policy
The Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization is committed to the policy that no person shall be excluded from participation in, be denied
the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity on the grounds of race, color, sex, age, disability or
national origin, in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 (P.L. 100.259).
Administration of the Capital Area MPO is provided by the City of Jefferson
Department of Planning and Protective Services
Room 120 John G. Christy Municipal Building
320 East McCarty St., Jefferson City, Missouri 65101
Phone: (573) 634-6410 Fax: (573) 634-6457
http://www.jeffersoncitymo.gov/campo
CAMPO 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program i
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
FTA 5303 Metropolitan & Statewide Planning and Non-Metropolitan Transportation Planning
FTA 5307 Urbanized Area Formula Grants
FTA 5310 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities
FTA 5339 Bus and Bus Facilities
Adv. Con. Advanced Construction
AM Asset Management (Replaces TCOS in 2022)
CAMPO Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization
CO Carbon Monoxide (vehicle emissions)
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
FAST Fixing America’s Surface
Transportation Act
FHWA Federal Highway Administration
FTA Federal Transit Administration
FY Fiscal Year
HSIP Highway Safety Improvement Program
MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century
MoDOT Missouri Department of Transportation
MPO Metropolitan Planning Organization
MTP Metropolitan Transportation Plan
NHFP National Highway Freight Program
NHPP National Highway Performance
Program
NO2 Nitrogen Dioxide
ONE DOT Collaboration between FHWA and FTA
PBPP Performance Based Planning and Programming
PM-2.5 Small Particulate Matter Lead
POP Program of Projects
PY Program Year
SO2 Sulfur Dioxide
STIP State Transportation Improvement Program
STBG Surface Transportation Block Grant Program
TAP Transportation Alternatives
TCOS Taking Care of the System
TERM Transit Economic Requirements Model
TDM Travel Demand Model
TIP Transportation Improvement Program
TPM Transportation Performance Management
VMT Vehicle Miles of Travel
CAMPO 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program ii
(Resolution)
CAMPO 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program iii
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization
Board of Directors
Chairman – Ron Fitzwater, City Council Member, City of Jefferson
Vice-Chairman –Jeff Hoelscher, Eastern District Commissioner, Cole County
City of Jefferson
Jon Hensley, City Council Member
Mike Lester, City Council Member
Hank Vogt, City Council Member
Sonny Sanders, AICP, Director, Planning & Protective Services
Matt Morasch, PE, Director, Public Works
Mark Mehmert, Director, Transit Division
Cole County
Eric Landwehr, PE, Director, Public Works
Doug Reece, City Administrator, St. Martins
Callaway County
Roger Fischer, Western District Commissioner
Holts Summit
Hanna Thomas, City Administrator, City of Holts Summit
Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT)
Machelle Watkins, PE, District Engineer
Ex-Officio Members
Missy Bonnot, Jefferson City Area Chamber of Commerce
Eva Steinman, Federal Transit Administration, Region VII
Joan Roeseler, Missouri Department of Transportation, Transit
Section
Cathy Brown, Office of Administration, Facilities Management,
Design and Construction
Michael Henderson, AICP, Missouri Department of Transportation,
Transportation Planning
Brad McMahon, Federal Highway Administration, Missouri
Division
Marty Wilson, Callaway County Economic Development
Technical Committee
Chairman – Sonny Sanders, AICP, Director, Planning and Protective Services, City of Jefferson
Vice-Chairman – David Bange, PE, Engineering Supervisor, Department of Public Works, City of Jefferson
City of Jefferson
Todd Spalding, Director, Parks, Recreation & Forestry
Matt Morasch, PE, Director of Public Works
Mark Mehmert, Director, Transit Division
Eric Barron, AICP, Transportation Planner
Britt Smith, PE, Operations & Maintenance
Cole County
Matt Prenger, PE, County Engineer
Shannon Kliethermes, Senior Planner
Callaway County
Paul Winkelmann, PE, County Highway Administrator
Small City Representative - Callaway
Mark Tate, Streets Department, City of Holts Summit
Small City Representative - Cole
Paul Stonner/Brian Schrimpf, Alderman, Wardsville
Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT)
Steve Engelbrecht, PE, District Planning Manager
Michael Henderson, AICP, Transportation Planning Specialist
Bob Lynch, PE, Area Engineer
Private Transportation Interest
Joe Scheppers, N.H. Scheppers Distributing Company.
Pedestrian or Biking Interest
Cary Maloney
Ex-Officio Members:
Eva Steinman, Federal Transit Administration, Region VII
Brad McMahon, Federal Highway Administration, Missouri
Division
- March 2021
CAMPO Staff
Sonny Sanders, AICP, GISP – Director, Planning & Protective Services
Eric Barron, AICP - Planning Manager
Katrina Williams, GISP, AICP – Planner II
Lee Bowden - Planner I
Beth Sweeten – Administrative Assistant
CAMPO 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program 1
Introduction
The Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO) is the designated metropolitan planning
organization for the Jefferson City, Missouri planning area whose purpose is to carry out a continuing, cooperative,
and comprehensive long range transportation planning process. As part of this process CAMPO updates the
Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) with the latest program year TIP, to address the current and future
transportation needs for the Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA). The MPA includes a southern portion of Callaway
County, northeastern portion of Cole County, cities of Holts Summit, Jefferson City, St. Martins, Taos, and the Village
of Wardsville.
Figure 1 – The CAMPO Planning Area
The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a 5-year financial program of transportation projects to be
implemented within the MPA. The projects are funded by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal
Transit Administration (FTA), or are deemed “regionally significant.” Each project or project phase included in the
TIP is consistent with investment strategies discussed in the MTP and is part of the process of applying for funds
from the FHWA and FTA. Certain capital and non-capital transportation projects using funding under 23 U.S.C.
and 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53 or regionally significant projects requiring action by the FHWA or the FTA are required
to be included in the TIP. The TIP is updated annually by CAMPO in cooperation with the Missouri Department of
Transportation and local public transportation operators.
CAMPO 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program 2
Public Participation
CAMPO seeks active and meaningful involvement of the public and interested parties in the development and
update of transportation plans and programs, including the TIP. All meetings of the CAMPO Technical Committee
and Board of Directors are open to the public. All meeting agendas and minutes are available on the City of
Jefferson website or upon request. CAMPO provides all interested parties and the public with a reasonable
opportunity to comment on the proposed TIP as required by federal law. Reasonable opportunity to comment and
participate on the proposed TIP is made following the policies in the CAMPO Public Participation Plan located on
the CAMPO website at http://www.jeffersoncitymo.gov/campo. The approved TIP is available for review at
several locations throughout the CAMPO planning area as outlined in the Public Participation Plan.
The FTA allows a grantee, e.g. JEFFTRAN and OATS, Inc., to rely on locally adopted public participation plans for
the submittal of their projects in lieu of a separate “Program of Projects” (POP) if the grantee has coordinated with
CAMPO and has ensured that the public is aware that the TIP and the Public Participation Plan are being used to
satisfy the POP public participation requirements. JEFFTRAN is the public transit provider for the City of Jefferson
and OATS, Inc. is a not-for-profit 501(c)3 corporation providing specialized transportation for senior citizens,
people with disabilities and the rural general public in 87 Missouri counties. Federal Transit Administration
recipients of certain categories of funds, JEFFTRAN and OATS, Inc. must follow a public participation plan. Both
JEFFTRAN and OATS, Inc. meet this coordination and public awareness criteria.
Project Selection
Transportation projects, funded by direct allocation of Federal funds to a project sponsor, award of Federal funds
via competitive grant, or wholly funded by the sponsor, are selected by the agency having jurisdiction over the
project using their own criteria and submitted to the CAMPO Board of Directors for inclusion in the TIP.
Transportation projects included within the TIP should be consistent with investment strategies discussed in the MTP.
CAMPO no longer receives any type of discretionary funding for infrastructure projects. If such funds again become
available, the following prioritization process is in place.
Transportation projects, funded by sub-allocated Federal funds directly to CAMPO or otherwise made available
for programming at the discretion of CAMPO, are selected based on competitive process approved by the CAMPO
Board of Directors. This process involves a call for projects, ranking based on CAMPO priorities by staff, and
review by the CAMPO Technical Committee, prior to being forwarded to the CAMPO Board of Directors for a vote
of approval. The ranking process has unique evaluation criteria for different categories of projects –
roadway/intersection, bridge, non-motorized, transit, and ‘other.’
TIP Development
The TIP is updated every year and covers a 5-year period starting July 1 of each year. TIP development begins
with a verification of status of projects in the current TIP, solicitation of new projects, and request for budget
information from local jurisdictions. Local transit providers are also requested to provide information needed to
develop their “Program of Projects” for inclusion in the TIP. CAMPO staff develops the financial plan, project
listings, maintenance and operations, and other components of the TIP with support from the Technical Committee,
member jurisdictions, MoDOT, FHWA, and FTA.
Once the draft TIP is developed, it is presented to the Technical Committee for review and recommendation to the
Board of Directors. A 25 day public comment period will open and be held prior to the Board of Directors approval
of the TIP. The Board then requests approval of the TIP by the Governor and ONE DOT (consisting of FHWA and
FTA).
CAMPO 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program 3
TIP Amendments and Administrative Modifications
Between TIP updates, if projects need to be added, removed or changed, the TIP can be changed either by
amendment or administrative modifications. Definitions of an amendment or an administrative modification, and
information about public participation, notifications, and other procedures regarding amendments and
administrative modifications, can be found in Appendix 3 – Policies and Procedures of this document. Appendix 1
contains a listing of amendments and administrative modifications that have occurred to this document.
Previous Projects
The TIP will include a listing of major projects from the previous TIP that were implemented and identify any
significant delays in the planned implementation of major projects. Major projects are defined as transportation
improvement projects receiving Federal financial assistance with an estimated total cost of $500 million or more or
that have been identified by the FHWA as being a major project.
No major projects were implemented, and no significant delays or projects from the previous TIP have been
identified.
Annual Listing of Obligated Projects
The Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act) requires that CAMPO publish an annual listing of
federally obligated projects. The Annual Listing of Projects is an index of projects which used Federal funds that
were obligated in the preceding TIP program year. Obligated projects are consistent with the funding categories
identified in the TIP.
An obligation is the Federal government’s legal commitment to pay the Federal share of a project’s cost. An
obligated project is one that has been authorized and funds have been obligated by a Federal agency. Obligated
projects are not necessarily initiated or completed in the program year, and the amount of the obligation will not
necessarily equal the total cost of the project. For Federal Transit Administration projects, obligation occurs when
the grant is awarded. For Federal Highway Administration projects, obligation occurs when a project agreement is
executed and the State/grantee requests that the funds be obligated.
CAMPO publishes the Annual Listing of Obligated Projects yearly within 90 days of the previous TIP’s program
year. The Annual Listing of Obligated Projects is posted on the CAMPO website at
http://www.jeffersoncitymo.gov/campo.
Air Quality Designation
The United States Environmental Protection Agency has designated the CAMPO Metropolitan Planning Area as
being in attainment for Ozone, Carbon Monoxide (CO), Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), Small Particulate Matter (PM-
2.5) Lead, and Sulfur Dioxide (SO2).
Environmental Justice
Executive Order 12898 requires agencies receiving federal funding to meaningfully address low-income and
minority populations in their plans, programs, policies, and activities. CAMPO staff expects project sponsors to
identify and mitigate any disproportionately high and adverse effects of federal transportation programs.
CAMPO 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program 4
Federal Performance Measures
In the passage of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21), and continuing into the FAST
Act, Congress established Transportation Performance Management (TPM). FHWA defines TPM as a strategic
approach that uses system information to make investment and policy decisions to achieve national performance
goals.
Another new requirement is Performance Based Planning and Programming (PBPP) which impacts the TIP and the
MTP. PBPP refers to the application of performance management principles within the planning and programming
processes of transportation agencies to achieve desired performance outcomes for the multimodal transportation
system.
To comply with these new requirements, the CAMPO Board of Directors adopted targets for five performance
areas: Transit Asset Management, Safety, Pavement and Bridge, Travel Time Reliability and Freight Reliability,
and Transit Safety.
Transit Asset Management Measures
MoDOT collected and evaluated existing buses and facilities to be included in the State Transit Asset Management
Plan and used this information to set targets, which will be evaluated on an annual basis as inventory changes.
JEFFTRAN opted to create its own Transit Asset Management Plan and set its own targets, which are identical to
the state targets. These targets can be found in the System Performance Report located in Appendix C of the
Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP).
JEFFTRAN has its budget, fiscally constrained projects, and Program of Projects in this document. The agency has
identified $13,566,012 projects programmed into the 2022-2026 TIP that may be utilized for bus replacement
and other capital projects to help JEFFTRAN move towards these targets.
Safety Measures
The Federal Highway Administration established five performance measures to assess performance and carry out
the Highway Safety Improvement Program: (1) number of fatalities, (2) rate of fatalities per vehicle mile traveled
(VMT), (3) number of serious injuries, (4) rate of serious injuries per VMT, and (5) number of combined non-motorized
fatalities and non-motorized serious injuries.
MoDOT established the following statewide safety targets in 2020, as seen, which were adopted by CAMPO.
These targets are updated annually. These targets can be found in the System Performance Report located in
Appendix C of the Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP).
There are a number of projects programmed for safety in the TIP, totaling $36,654,000 for Program Years 2022-
2026, all sponsored by the Central District of MoDOT, to help the State move towards these targets. CAMPO staff
also actively participates in the Central District Coalition of Roadway Safety, which works to implement Missouri’s
Show-Me Zero ultimate goal of zero fatalities on Missouri roadways, and participates in the annual Highway
Safety and Traffic Blueprint Conference.
CAMPO 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program 5
Pavement and Bridge Measures
The Federal Highway Administration established 6 performance measures to assess pavement and bridge
conditions: (1) percent of interstate pavements in Good condition, (2) percent of interstate pavements in Poor
condition, (3) percent of non-interstate national highway system (NHS) pavements in Good condition, (4) percent of
non-interstate NHS pavements in Poor condition, (5) percent of NHS bridges by deck area classified as Good
condition, and (6) percent of NHS bridges by deck area classified as Poor condition. There are no interstate
highways in the CAMPO region, so those targets are not addressed.
MoDOT established the following statewide pavement and bridge targets in 2018, and revised in 2020, which
shows the targets set by MoDOT and adopted by CAMPO. These targets may be updated every other year.
These targets can be found in the System Performance Report located in Appendix C of the Metropolitan
Transportation Plan (MTP).
Many projects in the TIP address Asset Management, a major priority for MoDOT. There are currently
$43,710,000 projects in the 2022-2026 TIP that address either work on roads or bridges that maintain or update
these roads or bridges which will help the state reach and maintain these targets.
Travel Time Reliability and Freight Reliability
The Federal Highway Administration established 3 performance measures to assess travel time reliability and
assessing freight movement on the interstate system: (1) Percent of Reliable Person-Miles Traveled on the Interstate,
(2) Percent of Reliable Person-Miles Traveled on the Non-Interstate NHS, and (3) Truck Travel Time Reliability
Index. There are no interstate highways in the CAMPO region, so performance measures one and three are not
applicable to CAMPO.
MoDOT established the following travel time reliability targets in 2018, which shows the targets set by MoDOT
and adopted by CAMPO. This target may be updated every other year. These targets can be found in the System
Performance Report located in Appendix C of the Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP).
There are currently no projects programmed into the 2022-2026 TIP with the sole purpose of improving travel time
reliability. Several of the projects within the TIP address this target indirectly, which will help the state with this
target.
Transit Safety Measures
The Federal Transit Administration requires that each Public Transportation Agency establish a Public Transportation
Agency Safety Plan (PTASP). This plan utilizes existing agency safety practices and industry best practices to meet
the new regulations set in 49 CFR Part 673 of the Federal regulations. The PTASP includes formal documentation
to guide the agency in proactive safety management policy, safety risk management, safety assurance, and safety
promotion. The goal is to provide management and labor with a comprehensive and collaborative approach to
managing safety. The plan includes the process and schedule for an annual review of the plan to review the safety
performance measures and update processes that may be needed to improve the organization’s safety practices.
There are currently no projects programmed into the 2022-2026 TIP with the sole purpose of improving transit
safety. While other projects within the TIP can address these targets indirectly, which will help the state and
JEFFTRAN with these targets.
CAMPO 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program 6
Financial Plan
The TIP includes a financial plan that demonstrates how the approved TIP can be implemented, and indicates
resources from public and private sources that are reasonably expected to be made available to carry out the
TIP. CAMPO, MoDOT, and public transportation operators cooperatively develop estimates of funds that are
reasonably expected to be available to support TIP implementation. Only projects for which construction or
operating funds can reasonably be expected to be available may be included. In developing the financial plan,
CAMPO takes into account all projects and strategies funded under Title 23 U.S.C., Title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53,
and other federal funds, and regionally significant projects that are not federally funded. For purposes of
transportation operations and maintenance, the financial plan shall contain system-level estimates of costs and
revenue sources that are reasonably expected to be available to adequately operate and maintain Federal-aid
highways (as defined by Title 23 U.S.C. 101(a)(5) and public transportation (as defined by Title 49 U.S.C. Chapter
53).
Forecast Revenue Available for Transportation Funding
Federal funding forecasts, provided by MoDOT based on published notices in the Federal Register, estimate fiscal
year authorization levels by the FHWA and FTA under the current highway act. Appendix 2 briefly describes most
of the Federal transportation programs which could fund projects in the CAMPO planning area.
For Federally-funded projects, the TIP must identify the appropriate “matching funds” by source. The matching
funds are usually provided by state and local governments. State revenue forecasts are also provided by MoDOT
based on historical data of the State Fuel Tax, State Vehicle Sales and Use Tax and General Revenue.
Local revenue forecast from the County Aid Road Trust (State Fuel Tax and State Vehicle Sales and Use Tax) for
each jurisdiction are based on past distributions and are assumed to continue a trend of a two percent inflation
rate. The City of Jefferson has a ½ cent sales tax to support its Capital Improvement Program and a ½ cent sales
tax for Parks and Recreation, which supports greenways and other non-motorized transportation activities. The
City of Jefferson has provided its own future revenue projections from these sources. Cole County has a ½ cent
sales tax to support its Capital Improvement Program and a real property tax levy of $0.27 earmarked for Road
& Bridges. All small cities get $100,000 every five years from Cole County, which comes from the aforementioned
sales tax. Callaway County has a real property tax levy of $0.2466 earmarked for Road & Bridges.
CAMPO 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program 7
Outlined in Figure 2 are local forecasts of revenue sources for over the life of the TIP available for transportation
projects.
Figure 2 – Forecast Revenue for Transportation projects
Local governments may use general revenue and other sources to match transportation grants awarded and may transfer funds from one
account to another at their discretion.
Callaway County 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total
CART 1,686,117$ 1,719,839$ 1,754,236$ 1,789,321$ 1,825,107$ 8,774,621$
Property Tax - Road & Bridge ($0.2466 levy)2,290,000$ 2,335,800$ 2,382,516$ 2,430,166$ 2,478,770$ 11,917,252$
Transfer from general revenue 3,255,700$ 3,320,814$ 3,387,230$ 3,454,975$ 3,524,074$ 16,942,794$
Sub Total 7,231,817$ 7,376,453$ 7,523,982$ 7,674,462$ 7,827,951$ 37,634,666$
Cole County
CART 1,144,887$ 1,167,785$ 1,191,140$ 1,214,963$ 1,239,263$ 5,958,038$
Property Tax - Road & Bridge ($0.27 levy)4,133,237$ 4,215,902$ 4,300,220$ 4,386,224$ 4,473,949$ 21,509,531$
Other Taxes 11,134,315$ 11,357,001$ 11,584,141$ 11,815,824$ 12,052,141$ 57,943,422$
Sub Total 16,412,439$ 16,740,688$ 17,075,502$ 17,417,012$ 17,765,352$ 85,410,992$
Holts Summit
CART 141,864$ 144,701$ 147,595$ 150,547$ 153,558$ 738,266$
General Revenue Funds 632,602$ 645,254$ 658,159$ 671,322$ 684,749$ 3,292,086$
Property Tax - Road & Bridge ($0.2466 levy)42,470$ 42,470$ 42,470$ 42,470$ 42,470$ 212,350$
Sub Total 816,936$ 832,425$ 848,224$ 864,340$ 880,777$ 4,242,702$
City of Jefferson
CART 1,699,030$ 1,733,011$ 1,767,671$ 1,803,024$ 1,839,085$ 8,841,820$
Sales Tax 12,052,197$ 12,293,241$ 12,539,106$ 12,789,888$ 13,045,686$ 62,720,117$
Property Tax & Other Taxes 14,842,399$ 15,139,247$ 15,442,032$ 15,750,873$ 16,065,890$ 77,240,440$
Fees & Services 5,288,496$ 5,394,266$ 5,502,151$ 5,612,194$ 5,724,438$ 27,521,546$
Sales Tax - 1/2% Capital Improvement 5,007,500$ 5,107,650$ 5,209,803$ 5,313,999$ 5,420,279$ 26,059,231$
Sub Total 38,889,622$ 39,667,414$ 40,460,763$ 41,269,978$ 42,095,378$ 202,383,155$
City of Jefferson - JEFFTRAN
FTA Section 5307 821,916$ 838,354$ 855,121$ 872,224$ 889,668$ 4,277,284$
FTA Section 5310 112,000$ 112,000$ 112,000$ 112,000$ 112,000$ 560,000$
FTA Section 5339 112,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 112,000$
Sales Tax - 1/2% Capital Improvement 80,000$ 80,000$ 80,000$ 80,000$ 80,000$ 400,000$
City of Jefferson-Local Operating Assistance 1,147,753$ 1,170,708$ 1,194,122$ 1,218,005$ 1,242,365$ 5,972,953$
MoDOT State Operating Assistance 11,500$ 11,500$ 11,500$ 11,500$ 11,500$ 57,500$
Farebox and Reimbursements 464,692$ 473,986$ 483,466$ 493,135$ 502,998$ 2,418,276$
Capital Funds 125,000$ 125,000$ 125,000$ 125,000$ 125,000$ 625,000$
Sub Total 2,874,861$ 2,811,548$ 2,861,209$ 2,911,863$ 2,963,531$ 14,423,012$
St. Martins
CART 44,961$ 45,860$ 46,777$ 47,713$ 48,667$ 233,979$
General Revenue Funds 522,100$ 532,542$ 543,193$ 554,057$ 565,138$ 2,717,029$
Sales Tax - 1/2% Capital Improvement 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 100,000$
Sub Total 587,061$ 598,402$ 609,970$ 621,770$ 633,805$ 3,051,008$
Taos
CART 34,628$ 35,321$ 36,027$ 36,748$ 37,482$ 180,206$
Sales Tax - 1/2% Capital Improvement 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 100,000$
Sub Total 54,628$ 55,321$ 56,027$ 56,748$ 57,482$ 280,206$
Wardsville
CART 59,396$ 60,584$ 61,796$ 63,032$ 64,292$ 309,099$
Sales Tax - 1/2% Capital Improvement 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 100,000$
Sub Total 79,396$ 80,584$ 81,796$ 83,032$ 84,292$ 409,099$
OATS
FTA Section 5310 40,000$ 116,000$ 70,000$ 126,000$ 70,000$ 422,000$
Farebox and Reimbursements 5,000$ 5,000$ 5,500$ 5,500$ 5,500$ 26,500$
Local Contracts 37,200$ 55,000$ 64,500$ 64,500$ 64,500$ 285,700$
Sub Total 82,200$ 176,000$ 140,000$ 196,000$ 140,000$ 734,200$
Missouri Rural Health Association
FTA Section 5310 201,402$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 201,402$
Member Contracts 242,643$ 247,496$ 252,446$ 257,495$ 262,645$ 1,262,724$
Fees 534,990$ 545,690$ 556,604$ 567,736$ 579,090$ 2,784,109$
Sub Total 979,035$ 793,186$ 809,049$ 825,230$ 841,735$ 4,248,235$
352,817,275$
Note: CART (County Aid Road Trust) includes State Fuel Tax, Vehicle Sales/Use Tax and Licensing Fees.Please see more on CART funds here: http://dor.mo.gov/publicreports/index.php#motorfuel
CART Funds based on 2020 numbers from MoDOT. There is a conservative two (2) percent increase per year, based on historical numbers.Funds are based on FY2021 budget numbers from each local jurisdiction.
* Holts Summit now receives Lake Mykee's CART funds after they merged in 2017.
Available Local Transportation Funds
Total Local Funds
CAMPO 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program 8
Figure 3 shows the total programmed project funds and available project funds by source. The project costs have
inflation factored in by each project sponsor. The instructions on the form used to submit a project for inclusion in
the TIP reminds the project sponsor to take inflation into account when estimating the project’s cost. Since the last
iteration of the MTP, the inflation factor for the TIP has been set as two percent.
Figure 3 – Programmed Funds and Available Project Funds by Source
2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total
FHWA AC - State $18,958,300 $6,518,800 $236,000 $2,233,600 $0 $27,946,700
FHWA NHPP $14,542,400 $9,808,000 $4,405,600 $4,324,000 $0 $33,080,000
FHWA HSIP $40,000 $613,600 $2,600,000 $0 $0 $3,253,600
FHWA STBG $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FHWA TAP $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FHWA SHRP2 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FHWA RTP $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FTA 5307 $821,916 $838,354 $855,121 $872,224 $889,668 $4,277,284
FTA 5310 $353,402 $228,000 $182,000 $238,000 $182,000 $1,183,402
FTA 5311 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FTA 5329 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FTA 5339 $112,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $112,000
$34,828,018 $18,006,754 $8,278,721 $7,667,824 $1,071,668 $69,852,986
MoDOT AM $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
MoDOT MPEN $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
MoDOT Safety $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
MoDOT State Oper.$11,500 $11,500 $11,500 $11,500 $11,500 $57,500
MoDOT SWIMB $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
MoDOT TCOS $8,310,300 $3,228,000 $1,160,400 $1,639,400 $0 $14,338,100
MoDOT Other $89,000 $1,006,600 $650,000 $0 $0 $1,745,600
$8,410,800 $4,246,100 $1,821,900 $1,650,900 $11,500 $16,141,200
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$1,184,953 $1,225,708 $1,258,622 $1,282,505 $1,306,865 $6,258,653
$56,000 $28,000 $28,000 $28,000 $28,000 $168,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$2,800 $19,000 $5,500 $19,500 $5,500 $52,300
$80,881 $0 $0 $0 $0 $80,881
$1,324,634 $1,272,708 $1,292,122 $1,330,005 $1,340,365 $6,559,834
$44,563,452 $23,525,562 $11,392,744 $10,648,729 $2,423,533
$92,554,020
Federal Totals
Programmed Funds
Federal
Local
State
State Totals
Total Programmed Total
Oats
Missouri Rural Health Association
Yearly Totals
Local Totals
JEFFTRAN
St. Martins
Toas
Wardsville
Callaway County
Cole County
Holts Summit
City of Jefferson
CAMPO 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program 9
2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total
FHWA AC - State $18,958,300 $6,518,800 $236,000 $2,233,600 $0 $27,946,700
FHWA NHPP $14,542,400 $9,808,000 $4,405,600 $4,324,000 $0 $33,080,000
FHWA HSIP $40,000 $613,600 $2,600,000 $0 $0 $3,253,600
FHWA STBG $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FHWA TAP $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FHWA SHRP2 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FHWA RTP $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FTA 5307 $821,916 $838,354 $855,121 $872,224 $889,668 $4,277,284
FTA 5310 $353,402 $228,000 $182,000 $238,000 $182,000 $1,183,402
FTA 5311 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FTA 5329 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FTA 5339 $112,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $112,000
$34,828,018 $18,006,754 $8,278,721 $7,667,824 $1,071,668 $69,852,986
MoDOT AM $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
MoDOT MPEN $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
MoDOT Safety $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
MoDOT State Oper.$11,500 $11,500 $11,500 $11,500 $11,500 $57,500
MoDOT SWIMB $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
MoDOT TCOS $8,310,300 $3,228,000 $1,160,400 $1,639,400 $0 $14,338,100
MoDOT Other $89,000 $1,006,600 $650,000 $0 $0 $1,745,600
$8,410,800 $4,246,100 $1,821,900 $1,650,900 $11,500 $16,141,200
$7,231,817 $7,376,453 $7,523,982 $7,674,462 $7,827,951 $37,634,666
$16,412,439 $16,740,688 $17,075,502 $17,417,012 $17,765,352 $85,410,992
$816,936 $832,425 $848,224 $864,340 $880,777 $4,242,702
$38,889,622 $39,667,414 $40,460,763 $41,269,978 $42,095,378 $202,383,155
$2,874,861 $2,811,548 $2,861,209 $2,911,863 $2,963,531 $14,423,012
$587,061 $598,402 $609,970 $621,770 $633,805 $3,051,008
$54,628 $55,321 $56,027 $56,748 $57,482 $280,206
$79,396 $80,584 $81,796 $83,032 $84,292 $409,099
$82,200 $176,000 $140,000 $196,000 $140,000 $734,200
$979,035 $793,186 $809,049 $825,230 $841,735 $4,248,235
$68,007,995 $69,132,021 $70,466,522 $71,920,434 $73,290,303 $352,817,275
$111,246,813 $91,384,876 $80,567,144 $81,239,157 $74,373,471
$438,811,461
Holts Summit
Available Funds
Federal
Federal Totals
State Totals
Wardsville
Oats
Missouri Rural Health Association
Local Totals
Total Available Funds
Yearly Totals
City of Jefferson
JEFFTRAN
St. Martins
Toas
State
Local
Callaway County
Cole County
CAMPO 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program 10
Operations and Maintenance
Maintenance costs include MoDOT’s salaries, materials and equipment needed to deliver the roadway and bridge
maintenance programs. This category includes basic maintenance activities like minor surface treatments such as:
sealing, small concrete repairs and pothole patching; mowing right of way; snow removal; replacing signs; striping;
repairing guardrail; and repairing traffic signals. Performing these activities requires employees; vehicles and
other machinery; and materials such as salt, asphalt and fuel. Maintenance operations expenditures are expected
to increase 1.5% annually. This makes MoDOT’s cost, $5,137 per lane mile.
Operations and Maintenance - Local Government
Local revenue sources for operations and maintenance include state fuel tax, state vehicles sales/use tax, local
sales taxes, franchise fees, license and permit fees, property taxes, and other revenue sources that provide
significant resources for local general fund and specific funding of transportation. Not all taxes and fees go to
transportation, so the local jurisdiction usually will identify a budget specifically for transportation purposes, such
as capital improvements, Road and Bridge funds, transit operating subsidies, road and street budgets, or operations
and maintenance budgets.
The operations and maintenance costs for local governments include salaries, fringe benefits, materials, and
equipment needed to deliver the street and bridge maintenance programs. This category includes basic
maintenance activities like minor surface treatments such as sealing, small concrete repairs, pothole patching,
mowing, snow removal, replacing signs, striping, and repairing traffic signals. These activities may be performed
in-house or outsourced.
Local government operations and maintenance on federal aid roads calculated for the system wide average of
operations & maintenance per centerline mile is determined below in Figure 4. As a further demonstration of fiscal
constraint, another requirement is that municipalities report their operations and maintenance budget. Reported
below are Cole and Callaway Counties, Holts Summit, Jefferson City, St. Martins, and MoDOT. The municipalities
of Taos and Wardsville do not have any locally maintained roadways that are eligible for federal-aid and have
not been included.
Figure 4 – 2021 Operations and Maintenance costs for local jurisdictions
*O&M totals were not provided by city – MoDOT O&M has been used in place of local figures.
Municipality Cost per lane mile
Callaway County $4,799
Cole County $6,014
Holts Summit $4,586
Jefferson City $6,076
St. Martins $7,146
MoDOT $5,137
CAMPO 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program 11
There are 546.67 miles of Federal-Aid eligible roadway in the CAMPO region, as seen in Figure 5. MoDOT is
responsible for the maintenance of all “State System” roadways (344.8 miles) while “Off System” roadways are
the responsibility of the local governments (201.88 miles).
Figure 5 - Federal Aid Eligible Road Mileage by Jurisdiction.
*O&M totals were not provided by city – MoDOT O&M has been used in place of local figures.
Source: MoDOT
In addition to the local government operations and maintenance previously discussed, JEFFTRAN expenses also
cover fleet repair/maintenance, repairing/replacing bus shelters, bus washing, bus maintenance facilities, public
restrooms, and fuel. Figures 6 and 7 show the estimated expenditures for transit operations and maintenance for
JEFFTRAN and OATs, respectively.
Figure 6 - JEFFTRAN Estimated Expenditures for Operations & Maintenance.
Operations and Maintenance revenue and expenditures are based on the most recently available budgets
Figure 7 – OATS Estimated Expenditures for Operations & Maintenance.
State System Off System Total
31.14 10.98 42.12
17.04 14.37 31.40
16.79 1.64 18.43
117.58 28.46 146.04
135.87 142.04 277.91
10.11 4.39 14.50
8.66 0 8.66
7.61 0 7.61
344.8 201.88 546.67
Lane Miles
Callaway County
Jefferson City
Holts Summit
Jefferson City
Cole County
St. Martins
Taos
Wardsville
Total
Jurisdiction
Personnel Services (1,585,776)$ (1,617,492)$ (1,649,841)$ (1,682,838)$ (1,716,495)$
Materials and Supplies (215,247)$ (219,552)$ (223,943)$ (228,422)$ (232,990)$
Contractual Services (315,095)$ (321,397)$ (327,825)$ (334,381)$ (341,069)$
Utilities (29,800)$ (30,396)$ (31,004)$ (31,624)$ (32,256)$
Repairs and Maintenance (409,042)$ (417,223)$ (425,567)$ (434,079)$ (442,760)$ Total (2,554,960)$ (2,606,059)$ (2,658,180)$ (2,711,344)$ (2,765,571)$
FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026
Personnel Services (72,300)$ (73,746)$ (75,221)$ (76,725)$ (78,260)$
Materials and Supplies (2,200)$ (2,244)$ (2,289)$ (2,335)$ (2,381)$
Repairs and Maintenance (4,500)$ (4,590)$ (4,682)$ (4,775)$ (4,871)$ Total (79,000)$ (80,580)$ (82,192)$ (83,835)$ (85,512)$
FY 2025 FY 2026FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024
CAMPO 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program 12
Financial Constraint
To exhibit financial constraint, a financial plan should address three questions:
1) What will the needs for transportation in the CAMPO planning area cost?
The needs are identified by project in the following section and costs are summarized by funding source in
Figure 2.
2) What revenues are available that can be applied to the needs?
Specific revenues available to meet the needs are identified in Figure 2 - Forecast Revenue for
Transportation projects, Operations and Maintenance, by jurisdiction and source.
3) Are the revenues sufficient to cover the costs?
As shown in Figure 3 – Programmed by Source, programmed fund amounts equal anticipated fund amounts.
For many jurisdictions as shown in Figure 2, available funds exceed the amounts of revenues required to
fund programmed projects.
CAMPO 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program 13
Demonstration of Fiscal Constraint
Source 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total
CART 1,686,117$ 1,719,839$ 1,754,236$ 1,789,321$ 1,825,107$ 8,774,621$
Property Tax - Road & Bridge ($0.2466 levy)2,290,000$ 2,335,800$ 2,382,516$ 2,430,166$ 2,478,770$ 11,917,252$
Transfer from general revenue 3,255,700$ 3,320,814$ 3,387,230$ 3,454,975$ 3,524,074$ 16,942,794$ Total Available Revenue 7,231,817$ 7,376,453$ 7,523,982$ 7,674,462$ 7,827,951$ 37,634,666$
Personnel Services (1,430,018)$ (1,458,618)$ (1,487,791)$ (1,517,547)$ (1,547,897)$ (7,441,871)$
Materials and Supplies (2,116,500)$ (2,158,830)$ (2,202,007)$ (2,246,047)$ (2,290,968)$ (11,014,351)$
Contractual Services (555,000)$ (566,100)$ (577,422)$ (588,970)$ (600,750)$ (2,888,242)$
Utilities (872,500)$ (889,950)$ (907,749)$ (925,904)$ (944,422)$ (4,540,525)$
Repairs and Maintenance (713,500)$ (727,770)$ (742,325)$ (757,172)$ (772,315)$ (3,713,083)$ Operation & Maintenance Totals (5,687,518)$ (5,801,268)$ (5,917,294)$ (6,035,640)$ (6,156,352)$ (29,598,072)$
TIP CommitmentsTIP Commitment Totals -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Remaining Financial Capacity 1,544,299$ 1,575,185$ 1,606,689$ 1,638,822$ 1,671,599$ 8,036,594$
Callaway County Demonstration of Fiscal Constraint
Revenue
Operation & Maintenance
Source 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total
CART 1,144,887$ 1,167,785$ 1,191,140$ 1,214,963$ 1,239,263$ 5,958,038$
Property Tax - Road & Bridge ($0.27 levy)4,133,237$ 4,215,902$ 4,300,220$ 4,386,224$ 4,473,949$ 21,509,531$
Other Taxes 11,134,315$ 11,357,001$ 11,584,141$ 11,815,824$ 12,052,141$ 57,943,422$ Total Available Revenue 16,412,439$ 16,740,688$ 17,075,502$ 17,417,012$ 17,765,352$ 85,410,992$
Personnel Services (2,568,249)$ (2,619,614)$ (2,672,006)$ (2,725,446)$ (2,779,955)$ (13,365,271)$
Contractual Services (98,978)$ (100,958)$ (102,977)$ (105,036)$ (107,137)$ (515,085)$
Supplies & Materials (2,652,327)$ (2,705,374)$ (2,759,481)$ (2,814,671)$ (2,870,964)$ (13,802,816)$
Other (839,539)$ (856,330)$ (873,456)$ (890,926)$ (908,744)$ (4,368,995)$
Capital Outlay (471,845)$ (481,282)$ (490,908)$ (500,726)$ (510,740)$ (2,455,500)$ Operation & Maintenance Totals (6,630,938)$ (6,763,557)$ (6,898,828)$ (7,036,804)$ (7,177,541)$ (34,507,668)$
TIP CommitmentsTIP Commitment Totals -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Remaining Financial Capacity 9,781,501$ 9,977,131$ 10,176,674$ 10,380,207$ 10,587,811$ 50,903,324$
Cole County Demonstration of Fiscal Constraint
Revenue
Operation & Maintenance
Source 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total
CART 141,864$ 144,701$ 147,595$ 150,547$ 153,558$ 738,266$
General Revenue Funds 632,602$ 645,254$ 658,159$ 671,322$ 684,749$ 3,292,086$
Property Tax - Road & Bridge ($0.2466 levy)42,470$ 42,470$ 42,470$ 42,470$ 42,470$ 212,350$ Total Available Revenue 816,936$ 832,425$ 848,224$ 864,340$ 880,777$ 4,242,702$
Operations (23,230)$ (23,695)$ (24,168)$ (24,652)$ (25,145)$ (120,890)$
Materials and Supplies (6,200)$ (6,324)$ (6,450)$ (6,579)$ (6,711)$ (32,265)$
Contractual Services (50,696)$ (51,710)$ (52,744)$ (53,799)$ (54,875)$ (263,824)$
Payroll (175,358)$ (178,865)$ (182,442)$ (186,091)$ (189,813)$ (912,570)$
Utilities (67,140)$ (68,483)$ (69,852)$ (71,250)$ (72,674)$ (349,399)$
Repairs and Maintenance (144,000)$ (146,880)$ (149,818)$ (152,814)$ (155,870)$ (749,382)$ Operation & Maintenance Totals (466,624)$ (475,956)$ (485,476)$ (495,185)$ (505,089)$ (2,428,330)$
TIP CommitmentsTIP Commitment Totals -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Remaining Financial Capacity 350,312$ 356,469$ 362,749$ 369,154$ 375,688$ 1,814,372$
Holts Summit Demonstration of Fiscal Constraint
Revenue
Operation & Maintenance
CAMPO 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program 14
Source 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total
CART 1,699,030$ 1,733,011$ 1,767,671$ 1,803,024$ 1,839,085$ 8,841,820$
Sales Tax 12,052,197$ 12,293,241$ 12,539,106$ 12,789,888$ 13,045,686$ 62,720,117$
Property Tax & Other Taxes 14,842,399$ 15,139,247$ 15,442,032$ 15,750,873$ 16,065,890$ 77,240,440$
Fees & Services 5,288,496$ 5,394,266$ 5,502,151$ 5,612,194$ 5,724,438$ 27,521,546$
Sales Tax - 1/2% Capital Improvement 5,007,500$ 5,107,650$ 5,209,803$ 5,313,999$ 5,420,279$ 26,059,231$ Total Available Revenue 38,889,622$ 39,667,414$ 40,460,763$ 41,269,978$ 42,095,378$ 202,383,155$
Personnel Services (26,003,453)$ (26,523,522)$ (27,053,993)$ (27,595,072)$ (28,146,974)$ (135,323,014)$
Materials and Supplies (1,362,103)$ (1,389,345)$ (1,417,132)$ (1,445,475)$ (1,474,384)$ (7,088,439)$
Contractual Services (1,875,083)$ (1,912,585)$ (1,950,836)$ (1,989,853)$ (2,029,650)$ (9,758,007)$
Utilities (1,009,797)$ (1,029,993)$ (1,050,593)$ (1,071,605)$ (1,093,037)$ (5,255,024)$
Repairs and Maintenance (1,800,425)$ (1,836,434)$ (1,873,162)$ (1,910,625)$ (1,948,838)$ (9,369,484)$ Operation & Maintenance Totals (32,050,861)$ (32,691,878)$ (33,345,716)$ (34,012,630)$ (34,692,883)$ (166,793,968)$
TIP CommitmentsTIP Commitment Totals (1,184,953)$ (1,225,708)$ (1,258,622)$ (1,282,505)$ (1,306,865)$ (6,258,653)$
Remaining Financial Capacity 5,653,808$ 5,749,828$ 5,856,425$ 5,974,843$ 6,095,630$ 29,330,534$
City of Jefferson Demonstration of Fiscal Constraint
Revenue
Operation & Maintenance
Source 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total
FTA Section 5307 821,916$ 838,354$ 855,121$ 872,224$ 889,668$ 4,277,284$
FTA Section 5310 112,000$ 112,000$ 112,000$ 112,000$ 112,000$ 560,000$
FTA Section 5339 112,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 112,000$
Sales Tax - 1/2% Capital Improvement 80,000$ 80,000$ 80,000$ 80,000$ 80,000$ 400,000$
City of Jefferson-Local Operating Assistance 1,147,753$ 1,170,708$ 1,194,122$ 1,218,005$ 1,242,365$ 5,972,953$
MoDOT State Operating Assistance 11,500$ 11,500$ 11,500$ 11,500$ 11,500$ 57,500$
Farebox and Reimbursements 464,692$ 473,986$ 483,466$ 493,135$ 502,998$ 2,418,276$
Capital Funds 125,000$ 125,000$ 125,000$ 125,000$ 125,000$ 625,000$ Total Available Revenue 2,874,861$ 2,811,548$ 2,861,209$ 2,911,863$ 2,963,531$ 14,423,012$
Personnel Services (1,585,776)$ (1,617,492)$ (1,649,841)$ (1,682,838)$ (1,716,495)$ (8,252,442)$
Materials and Supplies (215,247)$ (219,552)$ (223,943)$ (228,422)$ (232,990)$ (1,120,154)$
Contractual Services (315,095)$ (321,397)$ (327,825)$ (334,381)$ (341,069)$ (1,639,767)$
Utilities (29,800)$ (30,396)$ (31,004)$ (31,624)$ (32,256)$ (155,080)$
Repairs and Maintenance (409,042)$ (417,223)$ (425,567)$ (434,079)$ (442,760)$ (2,128,671)$ Operation & Maintenance Totals (2,554,960)$ (2,606,059)$ (2,658,180)$ (2,711,344)$ (2,765,571)$ (13,296,114)$
TIP CommitmentsTIP Commitment Totals (56,000)$ (28,000)$ (28,000)$ (28,000)$ (28,000)$ (168,000)$
Remaining Financial Capacity 263,901$ 177,489$ 175,029$ 172,519$ 169,960$ 958,898$
JEFFTRAN Demonstration of Fiscal Constraint
Revenue
Operation & Maintenance
Source 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total
CART 44,961$ 45,860$ 46,777$ 47,713$ 48,667$ 233,979$
General Revenue Funds 522,100$ 532,542$ 543,193$ 554,057$ 565,138$ 2,717,029$
Sales Tax - 1/2% Capital Improvement 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 100,000$ Total Available Revenue 587,061$ 598,402$ 609,970$ 621,770$ 633,805$ 3,051,008$
Personnel Services (75,380)$ (76,888)$ (78,425)$ (79,994)$ (81,594)$ (392,281)$
Highway & Streets (207,250)$ (211,395)$ (215,623)$ (219,935)$ (224,334)$ (1,078,537)$
Health & Welfare (74,300)$ (75,786)$ (77,302)$ (78,848)$ (80,425)$ (386,660)$ Operation & Maintenance Totals (356,930)$ (364,069)$ (371,350)$ (378,777)$ (386,353)$ (1,857,478)$
TIP CommitmentsTIP Commitment Totals -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Remaining Financial Capacity 230,131$ 234,334$ 238,620$ 242,993$ 247,453$ 1,193,530$
St. Martins Demonstration of Fiscal Constraint
Revenue
Operation & Maintenance
CAMPO 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program 15
Source 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total
CART 34,628$ 35,321$ 36,027$ 36,748$ 37,482$ 180,206$
Sales Tax - 1/2% Capital Improvement 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 100,000$ Total Available Revenue 54,628$ 55,321$ 56,027$ 56,748$ 57,482$ 280,206$
Operation & Maintenance -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Operation & Maintenance Totals -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
TIP CommitmentsTIP Commitment Totals -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Remaining Financial Capacity 54,628$ 55,321$ 56,027$ 56,748$ 57,482$ 280,206$
Taos Demonstration of Fiscal Constraint
Revenue
Operation & Maintenance
Source 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total
CART 59,396$ 60,584$ 61,796$ 63,032$ 64,292$ 309,099$
Sales Tax - 1/2% Capital Improvement 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 100,000$ Total Available Revenue 79,396$ 80,584$ 81,796$ 83,032$ 84,292$ 409,099$
Operation & Maintenance -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Operation & Maintenance Totals -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
TIP CommitmentsTIP Commitment Totals -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Remaining Financial Capacity 79,396$ 80,584$ 81,796$ 83,032$ 84,292$ 409,099$
Wardsville Demonstration of Fiscal Constraint
Revenue
Operation & Maintenance
Source 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total
FTA Section 5310 40,000$ 116,000$ 70,000$ 126,000$ 70,000$ 422,000$
Farebox and Reimbursements 5,000$ 5,000$ 5,500$ 5,500$ 5,500$ 26,500$
Local Contracts 37,200$ 55,000$ 64,500$ 64,500$ 64,500$ 285,700$ Total Available Revenue 82,200$ 176,000$ 140,000$ 196,000$ 140,000$ 734,200$
Personnel Services (72,300)$ (73,746)$ (75,221)$ (76,725)$ (78,260)$ (376,252)$
Materials and Supplies (2,200)$ (2,244)$ (2,289)$ (2,335)$ (2,381)$ (11,449)$
Repairs and Maintenance (4,500)$ (4,590)$ (4,682)$ (4,775)$ (4,871)$ (23,418)$ Operation & Maintenance Totals (79,000)$ (80,580)$ (82,192)$ (83,835)$ (85,512)$ (411,119)$
TIP CommitmentsTIP Commitment Totals (2,800)$ (19,000)$ (5,500)$ (19,500)$ (5,500)$ (52,300)$
Remaining Financial Capacity 400$ 76,420$ 52,308$ 92,665$ 48,988$ 270,781$
OATS Demonstration of Fiscal Constraint
Revenue
Operation & Maintenance
Source 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total
FTA Section 5310 201,402$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 201,402$
Member Contracts 242,643$ 247,496$ 252,446$ 257,495$ 262,645$ 1,262,724$
Fees 534,990$ 545,690$ 556,604$ 567,736$ 579,090$ 2,784,109$ Total Available Revenue 979,035$ 793,186$ 809,049$ 825,230$ 841,735$ 4,248,235$
Operation & Maintenance (641,418)$ (654,246)$ (667,331)$ (680,678)$ (694,291)$ (3,337,965)$ Operation & Maintenance Totals (641,418)$ (654,246)$ (667,331)$ (680,678)$ (694,291)$ (3,337,965)$
TIP CommitmentsTIP Commitment Totals (80,881)$ -$ -$ -$ -$ (80,881)$
Remaining Financial Capacity 256,736$ 138,939$ 141,718$ 144,552$ 147,443$ 829,389$
Missouri Rural Health Association Demonstration of Fiscal Constraint
Revenue
Operation & Maintenance
CAMPO 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program 16
Fiscally Constrained Transportation Projects
Source Category 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Future Totals
FHWA NHPP $80,800 $21,600 $102,400
MoDOT TCOS $20,200 $5,400 $25,600
TIP #2019-02 Local $0
MoDOT#5P2190 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA NHPP $228,000 $228,000
MoDOT TCOS $57,000 $57,000
Local $0
Other $0
Total $101,000 $312,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $413,000
Source Category 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Future Totals
FHWA NHPP $92,000 $291,200 $383,200
MoDOT TCOS $23,000 $72,800 $95,800
TIP #2022-03 Local $0
MoDOT#5S3458 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA NHPP $1,366,400 $1,366,400
MoDOT TCOS $341,600 $341,600
Local $0
Other $0
Total $0 $115,000 $2,072,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,187,000
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Project involves bridges A3508,
A3539N, A3539E, and A4635.
Total Project Cost: $2,187,000
Project
Name:
Bridge Improvements over Rte. 54 and
Rte. 94 E
N
G
Bridge Projects
Project
Name:
Bridge Rehabilitation On US 50 Over
Osage River E
N
G
Description & Location: Bridge rehabilitation
and upgrade guardrail over the Osage River
0.3 mile west of the Route 63 junction.
R
O
W
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Comments: Project involves bridge A5552.
Total Project Cost: $413,000
C
O
N
S
T
Description & Location: Bridge improvement
over Rte. 54 includes Rte. 94, Rte. H and Rte.
W over Rte. 54.
R
O
W
CAMPO 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program 17
Source Category 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Future Totals
FHWA NHPP $43,200 $43,200
MoDOT TCOS $10,800 $10,800
TIP #2022-05 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3449 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA NHPP $232,000 $232,000
MoDOT TCOS $58,000 $58,000
Local $0
Other $0
Total $0 $344,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $344,000
Source Category 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Future Totals
FHWA NHPP $800 $16,000 $42,400 $115,200 $174,400
MoDOT TCOS $200 $4,000 $10,600 $28,800 $43,600
TIP #2022-07 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3523 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA NHPP $659,200 $659,200
MoDOT TCOS $164,800 $164,800
Local $0
Other $0
Total $0 $1,000 $20,000 $53,000 $968,000 $0 $0 $1,042,000
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:
Bridge Improvement On US 50 over
Vetter Lane E
N
G
Description & Location: Bridge improvement
over Vetter Lane. Includes Bolivar Street over
Rte. 50.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Project involves bridges A0722E,
A0722W and A1420.
Total Project Cost: $1,042,000
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:
Bridge Rehabilitation On US 50 over
Moreau River E
N
G
Description & Location: Bridge rehabilitation
over Moreau River.R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Project involves bridge A0723.
Total Project Cost: $344,000
CAMPO 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program 18
Source Category 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Future Totals
FHWA NHPP $800 $800 $5,600 $7,200
MoDOT TCOS $200 $200 $1,400 $1,800
TIP #2022-08 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3451 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA NHPP $58,400 $58,400
MoDOT TCOS $14,600 $14,600
Local $0
Other $0
Total $0 $1,000 $1,000 $80,000 $0 $0 $0 $82,000
Source Category 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Future Totals
FHWA NHPP $36,800 $95,200 $202,400 $334,400
MoDOT TCOS $9,200 $23,800 $50,600 $83,600
TIP #2022-09 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3467 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA NHPP $1,230,400 $1,230,400
MoDOT TCOS $307,600 $307,600
Local $0
Other $0
Total $0 $46,000 $119,000 $1,791,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,956,000
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:
Bridge Improvement On US 54 over
Missouri River E
N
G
Description & Location: Bridge improvement
over Missouri River.R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Project involves bridges A4497 and
L0550.
Total Project Cost: $82,000
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:
Bridge Improvement on US 54 over
McCarty Street and Rte. 50 E
N
G
Description & Location: Bridge improvement
over McCarty Street and Rte. 50.R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Project involves bridges A1416 and
A1417.
Total Project Cost: $1,956,000
CAMPO 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program 19
Source Category 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Future Totals
FHWA NHPP $800 $16,800 $89,600 $182,400 $289,600
MoDOT TCOS $200 $4,200 $22,400 $45,600 $72,400
TIP #2022-10 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3525 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA NHPP $1,095,200 $1,095,200
MoDOT TCOS $273,800 $273,800
Local $0
Other $0
Total $0 $1,000 $21,000 $112,000 $1,597,000 $0 $0 $1,731,000
Source Category 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Future Totals
FHWA NHPP $800 $80,000 $80,000 $432,000 $592,800
MoDOT TCOS $200 $20,000 $20,000 $108,000 $148,200
TIP #2022-11 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3560 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA NHPP $1,840,000 $1,840,000
MoDOT TCOS $460,000 $460,000
Local $0
Other $0
Total $0 $1,000 $100,000 $100,000 $2,840,000 $0 $0 $3,041,000Total Project Cost: $3,041,000
Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:
Bridge Improvement On US 54 over
Neighorn Branch E
N
G
Description & Location: Bridge improvement
over Neighorn Branch.R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Project involves bridges K0760 and
G0302.
Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:
Bridge Improvement On US 54 over
Bus. 50 E
N
G
Description & Location: Bridge improvement
over Bus. 50, Linden Drive, Moreau Overflow,
and Stadium Boulevard. Includes Madison
Street Ramp over Rte. 54.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Project involves bridge A1305E&W,
A1307E&W, A1415, A1672E&W and A1309.
Total Project Cost: $1,731,000
MoDOT
MoDOT
CAMPO 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program 20
Source Category 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Future Totals
FHWA NHPP $800 $20,800 $84,000 $105,600
MoDOT TCOS $200 $5,200 $21,000 $26,400
TIP #2022-12 Local $0
MoDOT#5S3464 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA NHPP $465,600 $465,600
MoDOT TCOS $116,400 $116,400
Local $0
Other $0
Total $0 $1,000 $26,000 $687,000 $0 $0 $0 $714,000
Source Category 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Future Totals
FHWA NHPP $18,400 $32,800 $141,600 $192,800
MoDOT TCOS $4,600 $8,200 $35,400 $48,200
TIP #2022-13 Local $0
MoDOT#5S3526 Other $0
FHWA NHPP $4,000 $4,000
MoDOT TCOS $1,000 $1,000
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA NHPP $703,200 $703,200
MoDOT TCOS $175,800 $175,800
Local $0
Other $0
Total $0 $23,000 $46,000 $1,056,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,125,000Total Project Cost: $1,125,000
Total Project Cost: $714,000
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:
Bridge Improvement On TR D over
North Moreau Creek E
N
G
Description & Location: Bridge improvement
over North Moreau Creek.R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Project involves bridge A1470.
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:
Bridge Improvement On RT B over
Moreau River E
N
G
Description & Location: Bridge improvement
over Moreau River.R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Project involves bridge A3618.
CAMPO 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program 21
Source Category 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Future Totals
FHWA NHPP $800 $20,000 $60,800 $243,200 $324,800
MoDOT TCOS $200 $5,000 $15,200 $60,800 $81,200
TIP #2022-14 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3459 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA NHPP $1,059,200 $1,059,200
MoDOT TCOS $264,800 $264,800
Local $0
Other $0
Total $1,000 $25,000 $76,000 $1,628,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,730,000
Source Category 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Future Totals
FHWA NHPP $45,600 $99,200 $144,800
MoDOT TCOS $11,400 $24,800 $36,200
TIP #2022-15 Local $0
MoDOT#5S3457 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA NHPP $599,200 $599,200
MoDOT TCOS $149,800 $149,800
Local $0
Other $0
Total $0 $57,000 $873,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $930,000
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:
Bridge Improvement on RP US 50 E to
US 54 E over Rte. 50 E
N
G
Description & Location: Bridge improvement
over Rte. 50.R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Project involves bridge A1419.
Total Project Cost: $1,730,000
Description & Location: Bridge improvement
over Rte. 50 and Rte. D over Rte. 50.R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Project involves bridges A3978
and A4154.
Total Project Cost: $930,000
Project
Name:
Bridge improvement On CST W
Truman over Rte. 50 E
N
G
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30MoDOTFundingPrior
Funding
CAMPO 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program 22
Source Category 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Future Totals
FHWA NHPP $50,400 $50,400
MoDOT TCOS $12,600 $12,600
TIP #2022-17 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3442 FHWA $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA NHPP $272,000 $272,000
MoDOT TCOS $68,000 $68,000
Local $0
MoDOT $0
Total $0 $403,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $403,000Total Project Cost: $403,000
FundingMoDOT
Description & Location: Bridge rehabilitation
over Osage River.R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Project involves bridge A0506.
Prior
Funding
Project
Name:
Bridge Rehabilitation on US 50 over
Osage River E
N
G
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
CAMPO 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program 23
Source Category 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Future Totals
FHWA NHPP $40,000 $1,512,000 $1,552,000
MoDOT TCOS $10,000 $378,000 $388,000
TIP #2020-03 MoDOT $0
MoDOT#5P3409 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA NHPP $11,918,400 $11,918,400
MoDOT TCOS $2,979,600 $2,979,600
Local $0
Other $0
Total $50,000 $16,788,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,838,000
Source Category 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Future Totals
FHWA HSIP $160,000 $40,000 $83,200 $215,200 $498,400
MoDOT Other $40,000 $10,000 $20,800 $53,800 $124,600
TIP #2022-01 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3497 MoDOT $0
FHWA HSIP $530,400 $530,400
MoDOT Other $132,600 $132,600
Local $0
MoDOT $0
FHWA HSIP $2,384,800 $2,384,800
MoDOT Other $596,200 $596,200
Local $0
MoDOT $0
Total $200,000 $50,000 $767,000 $3,250,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,267,000
Roadway Projects
Description & Location: Roadway
improvements north of Missouri River Bridge in
Jefferson City.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments:
Total Project Cost: $4,267,000
Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:Roadway Improvements on US 54 E
N
G
Description & Location: Pavement resurfacing from
Rte. B to Rte. 54, Tom Bass Road from south of E
Meyer Industrial Drive to north of E Meyer Industrial
Drive and Ponderosa Street from E Meyer Industrial
Drive to Gans Creek and high friction surface treatment
on various curves.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments:
Total Project Cost: $16,838,000
MoDOT
Funding Prior
Funding
Project
Name:Pavement Improvements on US 63 E
N
G
MoDOT State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
CAMPO 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program 24
Source Category 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Future Totals
FHWA AC-State $244,000 $543,200 $787,200
MoDOT Other $61,000 $135,800 $196,800
TIP #2022-02 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3576 FHWA $0
FHWA AC-State $72,000 $72,000
MoDOT Other $18,000 $18,000
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA AC-State $2,869,600 $2,869,600
MoDOT Other $717,400 $717,400
Local $0
FHWA $0
Total $0 $395,000 $4,266,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,661,000
Source Category 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Future Totals
FHWA NHPP $24,800 $390,400 $415,200
MoDOT TCOS $6,200 $97,600 $103,800
TIP #2022-04 Local $0
MoDOT#5S3454 FHWA $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA NHPP $4,469,600 $4,469,600
MoDOT TCOS $1,117,400 $1,117,400
Local $0
FHWA $0
Total $0 $31,000 $6,075,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,106,000Total Project Cost: $6,106,000
Total Project Cost: $4,661,000
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:Pavement improvements on MO 179 E
N
G
Description & Location: Pavement improvement from
north of Truman Boulevard to Rte. B, Bus. 50 from Rte.
50 to Rte. 179, Rte. 50 from south of Truman Boulevard
to west of Dix Road and east of Vetter Lane to 0.5 mile
east of Moreau River.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments:
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:
Interchange Improvements at Simon
Boulevard and US 54 E
N
G
Description & Location: Interchange
improvements at Simon Boulevard and Rte. OO.R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments:
CAMPO 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program 25
Source Category 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Future Totals
FHWA NHPP $23,200 $172,000 $195,200
MoDOT TCOS $5,800 $43,000 $48,800
TIP #2022-06 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3453 FHWA $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA NHPP $2,092,800 $2,092,800
MoDOT TCOS $523,200 $523,200
Local $0
FHWA $0
Total $0 $29,000 $2,831,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,860,000
Source Category 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Future Totals
FHWA AC-State $337,600 $337,600
MoDOT TCOS $84,400 $84,400
TIP #2022-16 Local $0
MoDOT#5S3470 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA AC-State $1,535,200 $1,535,200
MoDOT TCOS $383,800 $383,800
Local $0
Other $0
Total $0 $2,341,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,341,000
Description & Location: Pavement resurfacing
from Rte. 87 to 0.2 mile north of Truman
Boulevard and Rte. AA from Rte. 87 to Rte.
179.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments:
Total Project Cost: $2,341,000
Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:Pavement Resurfacing on MO 179 E
N
G
MoDOT
Description & Location: Pavement improvement
from 0.2 mile east of Vetter Lane to 0.3 mile
west of Dix Road.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments:
Total Project Cost: $2,860,000
Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:Pavement improvements on US 50 E
N
G
MoDOT
CAMPO 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program 26
Source Category 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Future Totals
FHWA AC-State $800 $124,000 $124,800
MoDOT TCOS $200 $31,000 $31,200
TIP #2022-22 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3485 FHWA $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA AC-State $1,812,800 $1,812,800
MoDOT TCOS $453,200 $453,200
Local $0
FHWA $0
Total $0 $1,000 $2,421,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,422,000
Source Category 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Future Totals
FHWA AC-State $800 $800 $800 $135,200 $137,600
MoDOT TCOS $200 $200 $200 $33,800 $34,400
TIP #2022-23 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3487 FHWA $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA AC-State $2,098,400 $2,098,400
MoDOT TCOS $524,600 $524,600
Local $0
FHWA $0
Total $0 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $2,792,000 $0 $0 $2,795,000Total Project Cost: $2,795,000
Total Project Cost: $2,422,000
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:
Guard Cable & Guardrail Repair in
Northern Central District E
N
G
Description & Location: Job Order Contracting
for guard cable and guardrail repair on various
routes in the northern portion of the Central
District.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments:
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:
Guard Cable & Guardrail Repair in
Northern Central District E
N
G
Description & Location: Job Order Contracting
for guard cable and guardrail repair on various
routes in the northern portion of the Central
District.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments:
CAMPO 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program 27
Source Category 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Future Totals
FHWA $0
MoDOT TCOS $30,000 $15,000 $45,000
TIP #2018-08 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3402 FHWA $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
Total $30,000 $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $45,000
Source Category 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Future Totals
FHWA AC-State $47,700 $900 $48,600
MoDOT TCOS $5,300 $100 $5,400
TIP #2013-16 Local $0
MoDOT#5S2234 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
Total $53,000 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $54,000
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:Scoping Routes M, B & W E
N
G
Total Project Cost: $54,000
Description & Location: Scoping for safety
improvements at Route M and Route W in
Wardsville.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Anticipated federal funding
category: Safety.
Description & Location: Surveying to sell
excess right of way parcels in the Central
District.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: No federal funds used for this
project.
Total Project Cost: $45,000
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:Surveying E
N
G
Other Projects
CAMPO 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program 28
Source Category 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Future Totals
FHWA AC-State $8,000 $4,000 $800 $12,800
MoDOT TCOS $2,000 $1,000 $200 $3,200
TIP #2020-12 Local $0
MoDOT#5S3418 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
Total $10,000 $5,000 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,000
Source Category 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Future Totals
FHWA AC-State $120,800 $1,000 $121,800
MoDOT TCOS $30,200 $30,200
TIP #2020-11 Local $0
MoDOT#5S3421 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
Total $151,000 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $152,000
Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:Traffic Safety Studies E
N
G
Comments:
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:Scoping on South Ten Mile Drive E
N
G
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
MoDOT
Description & Location: Traffic safety studies
at various locations in Central District R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Description & Location: Scoping for intersection
improvements at South Ten Mile Drive in
Jefferson City.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments:
Total Project Cost: $16,000
Total Project Cost: $152,000
CAMPO 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program 29
Source Category 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Future Totals
FHWA AC-State $160,000 $2,000 $2,000 $164,000
MoDOT TCOS $40,000 $40,000
TIP #2022-20 Local $0
MoDOT#5S3503 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
Total $200,000 $2,000 $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $204,000Total Project Cost: $204,000
Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30MoDOT
Project
Name:Scoping for Slide Repairs E
N
G
Description & Location: Scoping for slide
repairs at various locations in Central District.R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments:
CAMPO 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program 30
Source Category 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Future Totals
FHWA AC-State $132,000 $308,000 $440,000
MoDOT TCOS $33,000 $77,000 $110,000
TIP #2022-18 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3490 Other $0
FHWA AC-State $15,200 $15,200
MoDOT TCOS $3,800 $3,800
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA AC-State $817,600 $817,600
MoDOT TCOS $204,400 $204,400
Local $0
Other $0
Total $0 $184,000 $1,407,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,591,000
Source Category 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Future Totals
FHWA AC-State $800 $32,000 $71,200 $104,000
MoDOT TCOS $200 $8,000 $17,800 $26,000
TIP #2022-19 Local $0
MoDOT#5S3546 Other $0
FHWA AC-State $8,000 $8,000
MoDOT TCOS $2,000 $2,000
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA AC-State $164,000 $164,000
MoDOT TCOS $41,000 $41,000
Local $0
Other $0
Total $0 $1,000 $50,000 $294,000 $0 $0 $0 $345,000
Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Pedestrian & Bicycle Projects
Description & Location: Upgrade pedestrian
facilities at various locations in Central District.R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments:
Total Project Cost: $1,591,000
MoDOT Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:Updating Pedestrian Facilities E
N
G
Description & Location: Upgrade pedestrian
facilities at various locations in Central District.
Project
Name:Updating Pedestrian Facilities E
N
G
MoDOT
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments:
Total Project Cost: $345,000
CAMPO 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program 31
Source Category 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Future Totals
FHWA AC-State $1,442,400 $2,920,000 $4,362,400
MoDOT TCOS $360,600 $730,000 $1,090,600
TIP #2020-16 Local $0
MoDOT#5S3369 Other $0
FHWA AC-State $502,400 $502,400
MoDOT TCOS $125,600 $125,600
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA AC-State $13,692,000 $13,692,000
MoDOT TCOS $3,423,000 $3,423,000
Local $0
Other $0
Total $2,431,000 $20,765,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $23,196,000Total Project Cost: $23,196,000
Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name: E
N
G
MoDOT
Description & Location: Upgrade pedestrian
facilities to comply with the ADA Transition Plan
and address nonstandard ADA facilities at various
locations in the Central and Northwest Districts.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Updating Pedestrian Facilities
Comments: $9,197,000 Statewide Transportation
Alternatives funds. Potential Design/Build project.
CAMPO 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program 32
Source Category 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Future Totals
Other Pass. Fares $430,950 $464,692 $473,986 $483,466 $493,135 $502,998 $2,849,226
MoDOT State Operating $11,500 $11,500 $11,500 $11,500 $11,500 $11,500 $69,000
TIP #2011-04 Local General Fund $1,232,151 $1,147,753 $1,170,708 $1,194,122 $1,218,005 $1,242,365 $7,205,104
MoDOT#FTA 5307 $805,800 $821,916 $838,354 $855,121 $872,224 $889,668 $5,083,084
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
Total $2,480,401 $2,445,861 $2,494,548 $2,544,209 $2,594,863 $2,646,531 $0 $15,206,413
Source Category 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Future Totals
Other $0
MoDOT $0
TIP #2022-21 Local JEFFTRAN $28,000 $28,000 $28,000 $28,000 $28,000 $140,000
MoDOT#FTA 5310 $112,000 $112,000 $112,000 $112,000 $112,000 $560,000
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
Total $0 $140,000 $140,000 $140,000 $140,000 $140,000 $0 $700,000
C
O
N
S
T
Comments:
Total Project Cost: $700,000
Public Transportation Projects
Description & Location: Operating Assistance
for JEFFTRAN service w ithin city limits of
Jefferson City (A 3% annual inflation factor
applied.)
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments:
Total Project Cost: $15,206,413
City of Jefferson - JEFFTRAN Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:Operating Assistance O
P
E
R
City of Jefferson - JEFFTRAN Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:Operating Assistance O
P
E
R
Description & Location: Section 5310 Grant
Program for acquiring new paratransit buses.
Providing mobility needs for seniors and
persons with disabilities.
R
O
W
CAMPO 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program 33
Source Category 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Future Totals
Other Pass. Fares $0
MoDOT State Operating $0
TIP #2020-17 Local General Fund $20,000 $20,000
MoDOT#FTA 5339 $80,000 $80,000
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
Total $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000
Source Category 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Future Totals
Other Pass. Fares $0
MoDOT State Operating $0
TIP #2020-22 Local General Fund $8,000 $8,000
MoDOT#FTA 5339 $32,000 $32,000
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
Total $0 $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,000
City of Jefferson - JEFFTRAN
Description & Location: This project would
supplant JEFFTRAN's current paper and cash-
based systems. Jefferson City, MO.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments:
Total Project Cost: $100,000
Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:Transit Farecard System Replacement O
P
E
R
Description & Location: This project would
replace outdated security cameras and entry
systems in transit facilities. Jefferson City, MO.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments:
Total Project Cost: $40,000
Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:
Replace Security Systems in Transit
Facilities
O
P
E
R
City of Jefferson - JEFFTRAN
CAMPO 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program 34
Source Category 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Future Totals
FHWA 5310 $56,000 $56,000 $112,000
MoDOT $0
TIP #2018-10 Local $0
MoDOT#Other OATS $14,000 $14,000 $28,000
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
Total $0 $0 $70,000 $0 $70,000 $0 $0 $140,000
Source Category 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Future Totals
FTA 5310 $115,000 $40,000 $60,000 $70,000 $70,000 $70,000 $425,000
MoDOT $0
TIP #2018-11 Local $109,000 $37,200 $55,000 $64,500 $64,500 $64,500 $394,700
MoDOT#Other OATS $6,000 $2,800 $5,000 $5,500 $5,500 $5,500 $30,300
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
Total $230,000 $80,000 $120,000 $140,000 $140,000 $140,000 $0 $850,000
Description & Location: Requesting
replacement/expansion vehicles to provide
service in Jefferson City and surrounding area
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Other Funding - OATS, Inc.
Total Project Cost: $140,000
OATS
Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:Capital Funding - Vehicles C
A
P
I
T
OATS
Description & Location: Within the Jefferson
City MPO Region-Section 5310-Seniors and
Individuals w ith Disabilities
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Other Funding - OATS, Inc.
Total Project Cost: $850,000
Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:Operating Assistance O
P
E
R
CAMPO 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program 35
Source Category 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Future Totals
FTA 5310 $390,956 $201,402 $592,358
MoDOT $0
TIP #2021-21 Local $0
MoDOT#Other MRHA $157,004 $80,881 $237,885
FTA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FTA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
Total $547,960 $282,283 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $830,243
Missouri Rural Health Association
Description & Location: Centered in the
CAMPO region and throughout all of rural
Missori. ICAM 5310 Grant.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments:
Total Project Cost: $830,243
Funding Prior
Funding
State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Project
Name:Operating Assistance O
P
E
R
CAMPO 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program 36
Figure 8 - Map of Fiscally Constrained Transportation Projects
CAMPO 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program 37
Figure 9 - Program of Projects - JEFFTRAN
Item Description Est. Total
Funding by
Others Local
1 Replace paratransit widebody cutaway buses 600,000$ $ 480,000 120,000$
2 Replace paratransit software and associated hardware 50,000$ 40,000$ 10,000$
3 Replace low-floor minivan support vehicle 40,000$ 32,000$ 8,000$
4 Replace transit administration vehicle 30,000$ 24,000$ 6,000$
5 Upgrade/replace fare card system 150,000$ 120,000$ 30,000$
6 Transit facility repairs & improvements 50,000$ 40,000$ 10,000$
7 Security upgrades for transit facilities 30,000$ 24,000$ 6,000$
8 Security upgrades for buses 75,000$ 60,000$ 15,000$
9 Update/revise Transit facilities feasability study 50,000$ 40,000$ 10,000$
10 Upgrade transit transfer facilities 150,000$ 120,000$ 30,000$
11 Purchase and install bus shelters and amenities at various locations in Jefferson City 30,000$ 24,000$ 6,000$
12 Update Bus Wash facility 175,000$ 140,000$ 35,000$
13 Add JEFFTRAN lighted signs for exterior of transit facilities 15,000$ 12,000$ 3,000$
14 Purchase back-up generator & switches for transit and CM facilities 100,000$ 80,000$ 20,000$
15 Replace low-floor route buses 6,000,000$ 5,400,000$ 600,000$
16 Construct replacement transit/central maintenace/bus barn/bus wash facilities 7,000,000$ 5,600,000$ 1,400,000$
17 Transit admin facility rehab 50,000$ 40,000$ 10,000$
18 Purchase and install additional transit traveler kiosks (each)15,000$ 12,000$ 3,000$
19 Add bike racks/benches at passenger transfer facilities and selected bus stops 25,000$ 20,000$ 5,000$
20 Charging systems/electrical upgrades for buses 600,000$ 480,000$ 120,000$
21 Add crosswalks and supporting bike/ped amenities to transit bus shelters 60,000$ -$ 60,000$
22 Rehabilitate/replace bus wash components 100,000$ 80,000$ 20,000$
23 Add solar lighting/occupancy indicators for selected bus shelters 35,000$ 28,000$ 7,000$
24 Replace floor scrubber for bus barn 10,000$ 8,000$ 2,000$
25 Replace bus hoists 200,000$ 160,000$ 40,000$
26 Replace mobile column lifts for buses 100,000$ 80,000$ 20,000$
27 Add vehicle electric charging stations and associated infrastructure 30,000$ 24,000$ 6,000$
28 Time-trracking software for transit employees 15,000$ 12,000$ 3,000$
JEFFTRAN 2022 Program of Projects
Illustrative Projects
CAMPO 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program 38
Multimodal Projects
In 2015, CAMPO met with federal and state planning partners in a formal planning process review. Within
two recommendations made, CAMPO was urged to include more multi-modal projects into the TIP. CAMPO
staff sent out written requests and reminders at CAMPO meetings for projects, including those not using
federal dollars. As of the writing of this document, no projects have been submitted.
However, there are a number of factors why these projects are limited. These types of projects are usually
incorporated into new road projects. Many of these types of projects are highly dependent on grants, which
may or may not be annually awarded. Projects are usually decided each budget year. There are several
bicycle or pedestrian projects in the MTP illustrative list, but projects are not constrained and funds are not
obligated.
Regionally Significant Projects
In 2020, MoDOT secured funding for the replacement of the Rocheport Bridge. This bridge is located along
Interstate 70 and crosses the Missouri River between Boone and Howard Counties. For the duration of this
project, travel inside the CAMPO region may see some minor impacts.
I-70 and the Rocheport Bridge are at the heart of National and Regional distribution, carrying
approximately 100 million tons of freight, worth more than $154 billion, annually. More than 20 percent
of this freight is through-traffic traveling from rural areas in the west to regions such as New York, New
England, and the Mid-Atlantic. Rocheport Bridge carries 12.5 million vehicles per year, of that, 3.6 million
are trucks. While the surrounding area is rural, there are a number of mid-sized cities within close proximity
to the bridge – including Columbia and Jefferson City – and it serves as a connector between Missouri’s two
largest metropolitan areas, St. Louis and Kansas City. Rocheport Bridge is 60 years old and will only last
10 more years, thus, under the current proposal a new bridge will be built over the Missouri River replacing
the existing 60-year-old structure. The new bridge structure will be built to accommodate six lanes, therefore
increasing capacity for future growth and reducing the restrictions over the Missouri River. During the
construction of the new bridge, the old bridge structure will remain open in an effort to limit traffic delays in
the area. Under the current proposal, construction is funded through FY2022. This project may cause minor
increases in volume on US Routes 40, 36, 63, and 50, but the proposed effects are minimal.
CAMPO 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program 39
Appendix 1 – Amendments and Administrative Modifications
Amendments
TIP
No. Project Description Project Sponsor Project Cost Board
Approval
OneDOT
Approval
TIP Amendments
Administrative Modifications
TIP No. Project Description Project
Sponsor
Project
Cost Date
CAMPO 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program 40
Appendix 2 – Federal Funding Sources
FHWA Programs Eligible Activities
National Highway Performance Program (NHPP)
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/fastact/factsheets/nhppfs.pd
f
The NHPP provides support for the condition and performance of the
National Highway System (NHS), for the construction of new facilities on
the NHS, and to ensure that investments of Federal-aid funds in highway
construction are directed to support progress toward the achievement of
performance targets established in a State's asset management plan for
the NHS.
Surface Transportation Program (STP)
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/fastact/factsheets/stbgfs.pdf
The Surface Transportation Program (STP) provides flexible funding that
may be used by States and localities for projects to preserve and
improve the conditions and performance on any Federal-aid highway,
bridge and tunnel projects on any public road, pedestrian and bicycle
infrastructure, and transit capital projects, including intercity bus
terminals.
Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/hsip/
Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) is to support a significant
reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads,
including non-State-owned public roads and roads on tribal lands
Transportation Alternatives (TA)
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/fastact/factsheets/transporta
tionalternativesfs.pdf
The FAST Act eliminates the MAP-21 Transportation Alternatives
Program (TAP) and replaces it with a set-aside of Surface
Transportation Block Grant (STBG) program funding for transportation
alternatives (TA). These set-aside funds include all projects and activities
that were previously eligible under TAP.
Railway-Highway Crossings (set-aside from HSIP)
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/fastact/factsheets/railwayhw
ycrossingsfst.pdf
This program funds safety improvements to reduce the number of
fatalities, injuries, and crashes at public grade crossings.
FTA Programs Eligible Activities
Section 5307 Urbanized Area Formula Grants
https://www.transit.dot.gov/funding/grants/urbanized-
area-formula-grants-5307
This program provides grants to Urbanized Areas (UZA) for public
transportation capital, planning, job access and reverse commute
projects, as well as operating expenses in certain circumstances.
Section 5310 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and
Individuals with Disabilities
https://www.transit.dot.gov/funding/grants/enhanced-
mobility-seniors-individuals-disabilities-section-5310
This program is intended to enhance mobility for seniors and persons
with disabilities by providing funds for programs to serve the special
needs of transit-dependent populations beyond traditional public
transportation services and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
complementary paratransit services.
Section 5311 Formula Grants for Rural Areas
https://www.transit.dot.gov/rural-formula-grants-5311
This program provides capital, planning, and operating assistance to
states to support public transportation in rural areas with populations
less than 50,000, where many residents often rely on public transit to
reach their destinations.
Section 5329 Transit Safety & Oversight
https://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/docs
/5329_Safety_Program_Fact_Sheet.pdf
This section requires FTA to implement and maintain a national public
transportation safety program to improve the safety of all public
transportation systems that receive federal funding. The safety program
includes a national public transportation safety plan, a safety
certification training program, a public transportation agency safety
plan, and a state safety oversight program.
Section 5339 Bus and Bus Facilities
https://www.transit.dot.gov/funding/grants/busprogram
Provides capital funding to replace, rehabilitate and purchase buses
and related equipment and to construct bus-related facilities.
CAMPO 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program 41
Appendix 3 – Policies and Procedures
Amendments
An amendment involves a major change to a project and requires approval by the Board of Directors and
Governor. An amendment is a revision that requires public review, allowance of comment, possible re-
demonstration of fiscal constraint, and includes at least one of the following:
• Addition or deletion of a project using FHWA or FTA funds (except as allowed as an administrative
modification),
• Major changes affecting project cost from FHWA or FTA sources (changes exceeding 20% of FHWA
or FTA sources of the existing project cost or changes over $2,000,000),
• Major changes in a project phase initiation date (greater than 12 months), or
• Major changes in design concept or design scope, such as changing project termini (more than 1/2
mile or 10% of the total length of the project, whichever is greater) or changing the number of
through traffic lanes that also includes a substantial increase in Federal cost.
Amendments will be initiated by the project sponsor. Amendments to delete a project can simply be made
via written correspondence identifying the project and why it is to be removed from the TIP. Amendments
to include a new project can be made on the TIP Project Form for the current TIP with a cover letter or remark
in the comment section requesting inclusion in the TIP as an amendment. Amendments for existing projects
can be made on the TIP Project Form for the current TIP with a cover letter or remark in the comment section
highlighting the change in the project and providing the CAMPO TIP Number.
After an Amendment has been requested the process as follows:
• Staff will review the amendment for accuracy and to verify if an amendment is required or
if the change qualifies as an administrative modification. Staff may consult with MoDOT
and FHWA if necessary.
• The amendment will be placed on the next Technical Committee (TC) meeting agenda for
review.
• The Technical Committee is an advisory board to the board of directors. Regardless of
whether the Technical Committee recommends approval of a project, does not recommend
approval of a project, or is unable to make a recommendation, the project shall still proceed
to the Board of Directors to make a final decision.
• If approval is recommended by the TC to the Board of Directors, staff will post the
amendment notice on the website, initiating a minimum 7 calendar day public comment
period, send notices to the appropriate parties, and place the amendment on the next Board
of Directors meeting agenda.
• At the Board of Directors Meeting, they will close the public comment period and a vote for
approval will be held.
If the project sponsor indicates an emergency situation upon submitting the amendment, staff will initiate the
public comment period, staff will post the amendment notice on the website, initiating a minimum 7 calendar
day public comment period, send notices to the appropriate parties, and place the amendment on the next
Board of Directors meeting agenda. Board members will close the public comment period at the next Board
of Directors Meeting and hold a vote for approval. If this is not adequate to meet the emergency situation,
a special Board of Directors meeting may be called and proceed as outlined in the Public Participation Plan.
CAMPO 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program 42
Administrative Modifications
Revisions to the TIP and TIP projects that do not meet the criteria of an Amendment will be considered
administrative modifications including: minor changes to project/project phase costs, minor changes to
funding sources of previously-included projects, and minor changes to project/project phase initiation dates.
An administrative modification is a revision that neither requires committee action, public review and
comment, nor redemonstrates fiscal constraint.
An administrative modification will be initiated by the project sponsor by written communication to CAMPO
staff describing the change (phase cost, funding sources, or phase initiation date) warranting the
modification. Staff will review the administrative modification for accuracy and to verify qualification as an
administrative modification. Staff may consult with MoDOT and FHWA if necessary.
Upon CAMPO staff confirmation of the administrative modification requirements being met, staff will modify
the TIP appropriately, including noting the administrative modification in Appendix 1 of the TIP and making
changes to the project listing in the body of the TIP; notify the Board of Directors, Technical Committee,
MoDOT, FTA, and FHWA via email; draft a staff memo for the next Board of Directors and Technical
Committee meeting; and post the modified TIP notice on the CAMPO website for a minimum of 7 calendar
days.
Combining or Splitting Projects
Splitting a project into two or more projects or combining two or more projects can provide benefits to
project scheduling, cost, and logistics. A split or combination can be made via an administrative modification
to the TIP, if the project does not trigger a major change to the project as described in the amendment
section and the overall scope of work does not change.
When combining two or more projects, the financial and description information will be rolled up into the
project which was in the TIP originally and use the previous MPO TIP number. When splitting a project into
two or more projects, the financial and descriptive information will be separated appropriately into several
(two or more) projects using the same MPO TIP number, but the additional projects will include alphabetic
suffixes. The process for splitting or combining projects will follow the procedures of either an amendment
or administrative modification.
Compliance with Metropolitan Transportation Plan
For a project to be eligible for the TIP, it first must be included in the adopted MTP. Large capital projects,
roadway capacity, and/or general purpose roadway projects must be individually listed or clearly part of
a larger project included in the fiscally‐constrained component of the plan. Certain projects seeking to
improve safety, increase multi‐modal opportunities, or enhance the existing transportation system may be
programmed in the TIP without individual identification in the regional plan, so long as they are consistent
with the established goals and objectives of the plan.
Project Delay Policy
The goal of the Project Delay Policy for the Transportation Improvement Program is to maximize the federal
funding obligated each fiscal year and to enable the MPO to redirect funds to different projects if any are
inactive or otherwise limited from making progress. The Delay Policy applies to projects funded through the
programs for which CAMPO has oversight of project selection.
The intent of the Delay Policy is to provide an incentive for local agency sponsors to develop their projects
according to a detailed schedule and, thereby, to obligate the federal funds assigned to each project within
CAMPO 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program 43
the timeframes initially shown in the TIP. The Delay Policy is primarily focused on projects that involve
construction or provide transportation improvements that are handled through purchasing procedures.
In the context of this Delay Policy, a “delay” occurs when a construction-related project phase does not get
advertised within six months of the TIP program year in which its construction phase funding was originally
programmed, or changed with an amendment, in the TIP. For non-construction projects and programs, a
“delay” occurs when the “Notice to Proceed” is not issued within two months of the TIP program year in which
its implementation was originally funded in the TIP. The consequence of a delay may be the withdrawal of
its Federal funds from the TIP or other action by the Board.
Project Funding Information
When a new project is submitted for inclusion to the TIP, either during the initial development of the TIP or
as an amendment, the project sponsor is required to provide information regarding the local funding sources
in order to show fiscal constraint. The specific source of revenue, anticipated future, and any other financial
information needed to show fiscal constraint will be required.
Project Selection
The CAMPO Board of Directors adopted (Resolution 2010-04) a project prioritization and selection process.
This process involves a call for projects, ranking based on CAMPO priorities by staff and reviewed by the
CAMPO Technical Committee, prior to being forwarded to the CAMPO Board of Directors for a vote of
approval. The Board of Directors may modify the project selection it deems necessary.
Project Sponsor Commitment to Projects
Project sponsors hold ultimate responsibility for ensuring that project information contained in the TIP is
correct, that it accurately represents the scope of work being performed, and that the amount of funding
being requested is correct. The sponsor is responsible for providing CAMPO with an honest accounting of
project details including: costs, implementation schedules, and local matching fund sources, at the time of the
application for federal funds and anytime such details change. The project sponsor is also responsible for
reviewing the TIP after a project is included or modified to ensure correctness.
Scriveners’ Error
Errors made the in the ministerial functions of creating and maintaining the TIP, such as cartography,
typographical, spelling, minor word omissions, mathematical, and other error’s which do not alter the intent
of the TIP and have little or no impact can be performed by staff and shall not be considered a revision to
the TIP.
CAMPO 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program 44
Appendix 4 – Definitions
Attainment area means any geographic area in which levels of a given
criteria air pollutant (e.g., ozone, carbon monoxide, PM10, PM2.5, and
nitrogen dioxide) meet the health-based National Ambient Air Quality
Standards (NAAQS) for that pollutant. An area may be an attainment area for
one pollutant and a nonattainment area for others. A maintenance area (see
definition below) is not considered an attainment area for transportation
planning purposes.
Available funds means funds derived from an existing source dedicated to or
historically used for transportation purposes. For Federal funds, authorized
and/or appropriated funds and the extrapolation of formula and
discretionary funds at historic rates of increase are considered available. A
similar approach may be used for State and local funds that are dedicated to
or historically used for transportation purposes.
Conformity means a Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7506(c)) requirement that
ensures that Federal funding and approval are given to transportation plans,
programs and projects that are consistent with the air quality goals established
by a State Implementation Plan (SIP). Conformity, to the purpose of the SIP,
means that transportation activities will not cause new air quality violations,
worsen existing violations, or delay timely attainment of the NAAQS. The
transportation conformity rule (40 CFR part 93) sets forth policy, criteria, and
procedures for demonstrating and assuring conformity of transportation
activities.
Cooperation means that the parties involved in carrying out the transportation
planning and programming processes work together to achieve a common goal
or objective.
Coordination means the cooperative development of plans, programs, and
schedules among agencies and entities with legal standing and adjustment of
such plans, programs, and schedules to achieve general consistency, as
appropriate.
Design concept means the type of facility identified for a transportation
improvement project (e.g., freeway, expressway, arterial highway, grade
separated highway, toll road, reserved right-of-way rail transit, mixed-traffic
rail transit, or busway).
Design scope means the aspects that will affect the proposed facility’s impact
on the region, usually as they relate to vehicle or person carrying capacity and
control (e.g., number of lanes or tracks to be constructed or added, length of
project, signalization, safety features, access control including approximate
number and location of interchanges, or preferential treatment for high
occupancy vehicles).
Financial Plan means documentation required to be included with a
metropolitan transportation plan and TIP (and optional for the long-range
statewide transportation plan and STIP) that demonstrates the consistency
between reasonably available and projected sources of Federal, State, local,
and private revenues and the costs of implementing proposed transportation
system improvements.
Financially Constrained or Fiscal Constraint means that the metropolitan
transportation plan, TIP, and STIP includes sufficient financial information for
demonstrating that projects in the metropolitan transportation plan, TIP, and
STIP can be implemented using committed, available, or reasonably available
revenue sources, with reasonable assurance that the federally supported
transportation system is being adequately operated and maintained. For the
TIP and the STIP, financial constraint/fiscal constraint applies to each program
year. Additionally, projects in air quality nonattainment and maintenance
areas can be included in the first two years of the TIP and STIP only if funds
are available or committed.
Illustrative Project means an additional transportation project that may (but is
not required to) be included in a financial plan for a metropolitan
transportation plan, TIP, or STIP if reasonable additional resources were to
become available.
Maintenance Area means any geographic region of the United States that the
EPA previously designated as a nonattainment area for one or more pollutants
pursuant to the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, and subsequently
redesignated as an attainment area subject to the requirement to develop a
maintenance plan under section 175A of the Clean Air Act, as amended.
Major Projects - These transportation improvements are defined as projects
receiving Federal financial assistance 1) with an estimated total cost of $500
million or more or 2) that have been identified by the FHWA as being a Major
Project. The designated projects may include those: 1) that require a
substantial amount of a State Transportation Agency's program resources, 2)
that have a high level of public or congressional attention, or 3) that have
extraordinary implications for the national transportation system.
Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA) means the geographic area determined
by agreement between the metropolitan planning organization (MPO) for the
area and the Governor, in which the metropolitan transportation planning
process is carried out.
Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) means the official multimodal
transportation plan addressing no less than a 20-year planning horizon that is
developed, adopted, and updated by CAMPO through the metropolitan
transportation planning process.
Nonattainment area means any geographic region of the United States that
has been designated by the EPA as a nonattainment area under section 107 of
the Clean Air Act for any pollutants for which an NAAQS exists.
Obligated projects means strategies and projects funded under title 23 U.S.C.
and title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53 for which the supporting Federal funds were
authorized and committed by the State or designated recipient in the
preceding program year, and authorized by the FHWA or awarded as a
grant by the FTA.
Program of Projects (POP) is a list of projects to be funded in a grant
application submitted to FTA by a designated recipient. The POP lists the
subrecipients and indicates whether they are private non-profit agencies,
governmental authorities, or private providers of transportation service,
designates the areas served (including rural areas), and identifies any tribal
entities. In addition, the POP includes a brief description of the projects, total
project cost, and Federal share for each project.
Project selection means the procedures followed by MPOs, States, and public
transportation operators to advance projects from the first four years of an
approved TIP and/or STIP to implementation, in accordance with agreed upon
procedures.
Project sponsor must be a city, county, state, or other transportation related
government agency eligible to receive federal funding from the Federal
Highway or Federal Transit Administrations. All other entities must partner with
a city, county, or state agency to apply for and/or administer a transportation
project.
Public transportation operator means the public entity which participates in
the continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive transportation planning process
in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 134 and 135 and 49 U.S.C. 5303 and 5304,
and is the designated recipient of Federal funds under title 49 U.S.C. Chapter
53 for transportation by a conveyance that provides regular and continuing
general or special transportation to the public, but does not include school bus,
charter, or intercity bus transportation or intercity passenger rail transportation
provided by Amtrak.
Regionally significant project means a transportation project (other than
projects that may be grouped in the TIP and/or STIP or exempt projects as
defined in EPA’s transportation conformity regulation (40 CFR part 93)) that is
on a facility which serves regional transportation needs (such as access to and
from the area outside the region; major activity centers in the region; major
planned developments such as new retail malls, sports complexes, or
employment centers; or transportation terminals) and would normally be
included in the modeling of the metropolitan area’s transportation network. At
a minimum, this includes all principal arterial highways and all fixed guideway
transit facilities that offer a significant alternative to regional highway travel.
Statewide transportation improvement program (STIP) means a statewide
prioritized listing/program of transportation projects covering a period of four
years that is consistent with the long-range statewide transportation plan,
metropolitan transportation plans, and TIPs, and required for projects to be
eligible for funding under title 23 U.S.C. and title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53.
Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a document prepared by a
metropolitan planning organization that lists projects to be funded with
FHWA/FTA funds for the at least next one- to three-year period.
Unified Planning Work Plan (UPWP) is the management plan for the
(metropolitan) planning program. Its purpose is to coordinate the planning
activities of all participants in the planning process.
Agenda Item 6B
CAMPO Board of Directors Staff Report
FY2022 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
May 19, 2021
Summary
Staff has developed a draft FY2022 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP). This annual process starts very
early due to the City of Jefferson’s budget process.
The UPWP is CAMPO’s annual statement of work identifying the budget, planning priorities, and activities to be
carried out for the fiscal year (November 1 to October 31). The UPWP serves as the basis for funding agreements
with the Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT).
The estimated draft budget for FY2022 is approximately $190,449 with $152,359 (80%) funded through the
Consolidated Planning Grant (CPG) and $38,090 (20%) funded through local match. The 20% local match is
provided by Jefferson City (75%) and Cole County (25%). Based on the anticapated FY2021 expenditure and
estimated FY2022 draft budget, it is projected that CAMPO will have a balance of approximately $458,870 in
unprogrammed CPG funds at the end of FY2022.
Staff requests the Technical Committee please review the objectives and activities outlined in the attached draft
document and provide comments. Input from the Technical Committee, Board of Directors, stakeholders, and the
general public are used throughout the process. UPWP activities are categorized into five work elements:
• Work Element 1 - Program Support & Administration - This task covers the activities necessary to
carry out the daily activities of CAMPO in support of the transportation planning process (meeting
preparation, UPWP, public outreach, reporting, and professional development).
• Work Element 2 - General Development and Comprehensive Planning Coordination - This task
includes the development and maintenance of related spatial and non-spatial data collection and analysis
(land use, demographic data, housing, environmental/natural resources, and public facilities).
• Work Element 3 - Long Range Transportation Planning - This work task addresses transportation
planning activities, studies, and other plans supporting a minimum 20 -year planning process.
• Work Element 4 - Short Range Transportation Planning & Programming - This task addresses
immediate or short-term transportation needs which may include planning activities related to non-
motorized, freight, bicycle/pedestrian, safety, operations, transportation security, or wayfinding.
• Work Element 5 - Public Transportation Planning – This task addresses assistance to public
transportation and transit providers in fulfilling State, Local, and Federal requirements for coordination and
cooperative planning (plan development, technical assistance, mapping, data, and GIS functions).
A draft FY 2022 UPWP is attached to this staff report. Please refer questions or comments to Katrina Williams
at 573-634-6536 or by email at kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org.
Public Comment
A 25-day public comment period was opened April 22nd. No comments have been received.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends adoption of the draft FY2022 UPWP.
Recommended Form of Motion:
Motion to close the public comment period and adopt the FY2022 Unified Planning Work Program.
Unified
Planning
Work
Program
The preparation of this report was financed in part by the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, and Federal Transit
Administration in cooperation with the Missouri Department of Transportation. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this report are not
necessarily those of the Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Administration, or the Missouri Department of Transportation.
FY 2022
November 1, 2021 to October 31, 2022
Adopted May 19, 2021
Administration of the Capital Area MPO is provided by the City of Jefferson
Department of Planning and Protective Services
Room 120 John G. Christy Municipal Building
320 East McCarty St., Jefferson City, Missouri 65101
Phone: (573) 634-6410
http://www.jeffersoncitymo.gov/campo
DRAFT
Table of Contents
Introduction......................................................................................................................................................... 1
Major Tasks Completed in FY 2021 ............................................................................................................. 2
Tasks Carried Over from FY 2021 ............................................................................................................... 2
UPWP Development ......................................................................................................................................... 2
UPWP Modification and Amendment Process ............................................................................................. 2
Public Participation ........................................................................................................................................... 2
Financial Support for CAMPO ....................................................................................................................... 3
Transportation Planning Factors ..................................................................................................................... 4
Figure 1: Planning Factors as addressed by work elements ................................................................................. 4
Required Documents Timeline ......................................................................................................................... 4
Figure 2: Timeline for updating required MPO plans and documents ................................................................ 5
Work Element 521 - Program Support & Administration ......................................................................... 6
Work Element 522 - General Development and Comprehensive Planning Coordination ................. 7
Work Element 523 - Long Range Transportation Planning ...................................................................... 8
Work Element 524 - Short Range Transportation Planning & Programming ....................................... 9
Work Element 526 - Public Transportation Planning ............................................................................... 10
Appendix A – Financial Summary ............................................................................................................... 11
Anticipated Expenditures & Revenue ...................................................................................................................... 11
Table 1: FY 2022 CAMPO Budget* ...................................................................................................................... 11
Table 2: FY2021 Work Element Funding Summary - Consolidated Planning Grant and Local Funds .... 12
Table 3: FY 2022 Local Match by Jurisdiction .................................................................................................... 12
Table 4: Anticipated Available Federal Consolidated Planning Grant (CPG) Balance Revenue ............ 12
Appendix B – CAMPO Boundary Map ...................................................................................................... 13
Appendix C - Modifications and Amendments ......................................................................................... 14
DRAFT
Insert Adoption Resolution
DRAFT
Insert Planning Process Certification
DRAFT
Insert Certification of Restrictions on Lobbying
DRAFT
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization
Board of Directors
Chairman – Ron Fitzwater, City Council Member, City of Jefferson
Vice-Chairman – Jeff Hoelscher, Eastern District Commissioner, Cole County
City of Jefferson
Jon Hensley, City Council Member
Mike Lester, City Council Member
Hank Vogt, City Council Member
Matt Morasch, PE, Director, Public Works
Mark Mehmert, Director, Transit Division
Sonny Sanders, AICP, Director, Planning & Protective Services
Cole County
Eric Landwehr, PE, Director, Public Works
Doug Reece, City Administrator, St. Martins
Callaway County
Roger Fischer, Western District Commissioner
Holts Summit
Hanna Thomas, City Administrator, Holts Summit
Missouri Department of Transportation
Machelle Watkins, PE, District Engineer
Ex-Officio Members
Randall Allen, Jefferson City Area Chamber of Commerce
Cathy Brown, Office of Administration, Facilities Management,
Design and Construction
Marty Wilson, Callaway County Economic Development
Brad McMahon, Federal Highway Administration, Missouri
Division
Michael Henderson, AICP, Missouri Department of Transportation,
Transportation Planning
Joan Roeseler, Missouri Department of Transportation, Transit
Section
Eva Steinman, Federal Transit Administration, Region VII
Technical Committee
Chairman – Sonny Sanders, AICP, Director, Planning and Protective Services, City of Jefferson
Vice-Chairman – David Bange, PE, Engineering Supervisor, Dept. of Public Works, City of Jefferson
City of Jefferson
Todd Spalding, Director, Parks, Recreation & Forestry
Matt Morasch, PE, Director of Public Works
Mark Mehmert, Director, Transit Division
Eric Barron, AICP, Planning Manager
Britt Smith, PE, Operations & Maintenance
Cole County
Eric Landwehr, PE, Director of Public Works
Shannon Kliethermes, Senior Planner
Callaway County
Paul Winkelmann, PE, County Highway Administrator
Small City Representative - Callaway
Mark Tate, Streets Department, City of Holts Summit
Small City Representative – Cole
Paul Stonner/Brian Schrimpf, Wardsville
Missouri Department of Transportation
Steve Engelbrecht, PE, District Planning Manager
Michael Henderson, AICP, Transportation Planning Specialist
Bob Lynch, PE, Area Engineer
Private Transportation Interest
Joe Scheppers, N.H. Scheppers Distributing Company.
Pedestrian or Biking Interest
Cary Maloney
Ex-Officio Members:
Eva Steinman, Federal Transit Administration,
Region VII
Brad McMahon, Federal Highway Administration: Missouri
Division
CAMPO Staff and FTE (Full-Time Employee) apportionment
Sonny Sanders, AICP, GISP, PTP – Director, Planning & Protective Services FTE – 0*
Eric Barron, AICP - Planning Manager FTE - 0.3
Katrina Williams, GISP, AICP –Planner II FTE – 1
Lee Bowden – Planner I FTE – 1
Beth Sweeten – Administrative Assistant FTE - .015
* The MPO Executive Director is also the Director of the Jefferson City Department of Planning and Protective Services. This
full-time position is not funded by the MPO and does not appear in the CAMPO Budget. MPO activities are only a portion of the
Director’s job duties.
DRAFT
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY 2022 UPWP 1
Introduction
The Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO) is
responsible for long-range transportation planning for the defined
Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA), which includes the Jefferson
City urbanized area. Planning activities are carried out in a
continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive manner. The Fiscal
Year 2022 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) defines tasks
and anticipates funding requirements for the metropolitan planning
activities performed by the CAMPO with federal funds provided
by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Federal
Transit Administration (FTA) under title 23 U.S.C . and title 49
U.S.C. Chapter 53. CAMPO Staff, unless otherwise identified,
performs all work. The UPWP defines activities for all public
officials and agencies that contribute resources to the
transportation planning process. The UPWP covers one fiscal year,
November 1 to October 31, and outlines activities funded through
the Consolidated Planning Grant and local funds and serves as the
basis for funding agreements with the Missouri Department of
Transportation (MoDOT). The UPWP also serves as a management
tool for scheduling, budgeting, and monitoring the local planning
activities.
The MPA boundary was delineated by the CAMPO Board of
Directors and approved by the Governor in 2013 (see Appendix
B). The MPA includes the jurisdictions of Holts Summit, Jefferson
City, St. Martins, Taos, Wardsville, and portions of unincorporated,
non-urbanized areas within Cole and Callaway Counties.
The CAMPO Board of Directors is composed of elected and
appointed officials from local jurisdictions, selected state agencies,
and Federal transportation representatives serving as ex-officio
members. The CAMPO Technical Committee consists of
representatives from member agencies’ professional staffs and acts
in an advisory capacity to the Board of Directors. A memorandum
of understanding between members identifies the City of Jefferson
as the administrator of CAMPO, and as such, provides staffing. For
FY2022, the City of Jefferson will provide staff consisting of a full-
time Planner I, full-time Planner II, and part time support from the
Director of Planning and Protective Services, a Planning Manager,
and an Administrative Assistant.
Priorities for FY 2022
• Implementation of the goals and strategies outlined in the Metropolitan Transportation Plan.
• Provide technical assistance in mapping, data development, and land use planning to local
jurisdictions.
• Implementation of the Capital Area Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan and Coordinated Public Transit-
Human Services Transportation Plan.
• Continue implementation of FAST Act performance measures and targets.
• Continue update of the Capital Area Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan.
• Begin review and update of Title VI Program, including Language Assistance Plan and Public
Participation Plan as federally required.
Challenges
Transportation agencies are
challenged in finding sufficient
and reliable sources of funding
for operations, maintenance, and
improving efficiency and
accessibility. More fuel efficient
cars and fewer vehicle miles
travelled, combined with the
federal fuel tax not being raised
since 1997, has caused the
Federal Highway Trust Fund to
become insolvent and require
support from general revenue
fund infusions to cover shortfalls.
Similar challenges are occurring
at the state level. According to
a 2019 American Petroleum
Institute report, Missouri has the
49th lowest state gas tax, at
$0.1735 per gallon in the nation.
According to the Missouri Public
Transit Association, Missouri ranks
44th nationally in public
transportation funding, with 9
cents per capita being spent to
fund public transportation.
A challenge in the CAMPO
region is the ability to provide
transportation alternatives to
private vehicle ownership. Many
low-income individuals and/or
individuals with disabilities are
not able to drive private vehicles
and rely instead on public
transportation, walking, or biking
as their primary mode of
transportation.
DRAFT
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY 2022 UPWP 2
Major Tasks Completed in FY 2021
• Annual update of the Unified Planning Work Program and the Transportation Improvement Program.
• Staff assistance in hosting the 2021 Active Transportation Summit, hosted virtually.
• Update of FAST Act Performance Measures; include targets for safety, transit, travel time and freight
reliability, and pavement and bridge improvements.
• Update begun on the Capital Area Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan.
• Update of the Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan
• Update of a Crash Analysis Report for the CAMPO area.
• Staff updated route guides for JEFFTRAN.
• Development of RFQ and execution of JEFFTRAN Transit Feasibility Study
• Update of regional databases, including; sidewalks, greenway, bike trails/lanes and local roads
• Assistance provided to Jefferson City in the development of transportation and land use data to support the
update of the City’s Comprehensive Plan
Tasks Carried Over from FY 2021
It is anticipated that the update of the Capital Area Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan will be concluded by the end of
FY 2021. If this planning process is delayed or extended, it is possible that it may conclude in early FY 2022.
There are no other major projects anticipated to carry over from 2021. Staff will continue work on any technical
assistance projects as they arise.
UPWP Development
The UPWP is developed in accordance with 23 CFR 450.308 and 23 CFR part 420. CAMPO staff reviewed
previous years’ time required for activities to determine time allocations for this UPWP. Because the MPO is
administered by the City of Jefferson, CAMPO accommodates the city’s budgeting process/schedule and
execution of the Consolidated Planning Grant agreement and must begin the development of the UPWP several
months prior to the fiscal year for which the UPWP covers. CAMPO presents a draft UPWP to the Board of
Directors in April, prior to the beginning of the fiscal year. This early start presents difficulties in assuming future
tasks which may surface after adoption of the UPWP and in documenting activities occurring in the previous year.
UPWP Modification and Amendment Process
Modification: A change in language or content that does not result in a budget increase. This change may
consist of a change to a Work Element’s objectives, activities, or products. Modifications are communicated by
staff to the Technical Committee and Board of Directors at the next regularly scheduled meeting.
Amendment: A change in language or content which results in a budget increase or major change in a work
element. An amendment is necessary if a budget increase is needed which impacts the funding reimbursement
agreed upon between the Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission and the City of Jefferson.
Amendments must be approved by the Board of Directors, FTA, and FHWA. Some modifications may also go
through an official approval by the Board of Directors as deemed appropriate by staff.
Modifications and Amendments are documented in Appendix C.
Public Participation
Federal law requires CAMPO to develop a public involvement program to involve the community early and
continuously in the transportation planning process. A proactive public program which provides information,
timely public notice, and public access to key decisions is included in the CAMPO Public Participation Plan. During
the development of the 2022 UPWP, the document is scheduled to be discussed at monthly Board of Directors
and Technical Committee meetings from February to May, and concludes with a public comment period. Draft
copies of the UPWP as part of the meeting agendas and meeting minutes regarding UPWP development are
available to view on the CAMPO website. In accordance with the CAMPO Title VI Policy, any and all documents
produced by CAMPO, may be requested in other formats by contacting CAMPO staff at City Hall or by calling
(573)634-6410.
DRAFT
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY 2022 UPWP 3
Air Quality Planning
According to 23 CFR 420.111(e), State DOTs and MPOs also are encouraged to include cost estimates for
transportation planning, research, development, and technology transfer related activities funded with other
Federal or State and/or local funds; particularly for producing the FHWA-required data specified in paragraph
(b) of §420.105, for planning for other transportation modes, and for air quality planning activities in areas
designated as non-attainment for transportation-related pollutants in their work programs. The MPOs in TMAs
must include such information in their work programs.
Federal standards have been established through extensive scientific review, that set allowable concentrations
and exposure limits for certain pollutants. Air quality standards have been established for six criteria pollutants:
• ozone (or smog)
• carbon monoxide
• particulate matter
• nitrogen dioxide
• lead, and
• sulfur dioxide
The CAMPO Planning Area is in “attainment”. A geographic area with monitored levels that meet or do better
than the primary standard for each of these pollutants is called an attainment area; areas that do not meet the
primary standard for any one or more of these pollutants are called nonattainment areas. In Missouri, MoDOT is
responsible for implementing the conformity regulation for transportation actions in attainment and nonattainment
areas.
Financial Support for CAMPO
CAMPO receives 80% of funding from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit
Administration (FTA) 5303 funds through the Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) via the
Consolidated Planning Grant (CPG) and 20% via local funding. The 20% in local matching funds is provided by
the City of Jefferson and Cole County. Of the 20% local funding, Jefferson City contributes 75% and Cole
County contributes 25%.
The total CAMPO budget for FY 2022 is $190,449. Appendix A provides more detailed breakdown of
financial details.
DRAFT
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY 2022 UPWP 4
Transportation Planning Factors
The Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act), passed into law in 2015, identifies ten planning
factors required for consideration in any MPO planning activities, including in the development of the UPWP,
MTP, and TIP. Figure 1 provides an overview of those planning factors and how they are addressed by each
work element in the UPWP. A detailed overview of each work element is provided in the following pages.
Figure 1: Planning Factors as addressed by work elements
Planning Factor
Work Program Element
Wo
r
k
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
1
- Pr
o
g
r
a
m
Su
p
p
o
r
t
&
A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
Wo
r
k
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
2
- Ge
n
e
r
a
l
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
Co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
Co
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
Wo
r
k
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
3
- Lo
n
g
Ra
n
g
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
Wo
r
k
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
4
- Sh
o
r
t
Ra
n
g
e
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
&
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
m
i
n
g
Wo
r
k
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
5
- Pu
b
l
i
c
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
A. Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan
area, especially by enabling global competitiveness,
productivity, and efficiency.
◼ ◼ ◼ ◼
B. Increase the safety of the transportation system for
motorized and nonmotorized users. ◼ ◼ ◼ ◼ ◼
C. Increase the security of the transportation system for
motorized and nonmotorized users. ◼ ◼ ◼ ◼ ◼
D. Increase the accessibility and mobility of people and
for freight. ◼ ◼ ◼ ◼ ◼
E. Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy
conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote
consistency between transportation improvements and
State and local planned growth and economic
development patterns.
◼ ◼ ◼ ◼ ◼
F. Enhance the integration and connectivity of the
transportation system, across and between modes, for
people and freight. ◼ ◼ ◼ ◼ ◼
G. Promote efficient system management and operation. ◼ ◼ ◼ ◼ ◼
H. Emphasize the preservation of the existing
transportation system. ◼ ◼ ◼ ◼
I. Improve the resiliency and reliability of the
transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater
impacts of surface transportation.
◼ ◼ ◼ ◼ ◼
J. Enhance travel and tourism. ◼ ◼ ◼ ◼ ◼
Required Documents Timeline
Figure 2 outlines the general timeline for updating most of the federally required MPO plans and documents.
The fiscal year runs from November 1 through October 31 and quarters are as follows:
Quarter 1 – November 1 – January 31
Quarter 2 – February 1 – April 30
Quarter 3 – May 1 – July 31
Quarter 4 – August 1-October 31
DRAFT
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY 2022 UPWP 5
Figure 2: Timeline for updating required MPO plans and documents
MTP - Metropolitan Transportation Plan Expires May 2024
TIP – Transportation Improvement Program Approved in May (Expires in June)
UPWP – Unified Planning Work Program Approved in May (Expires in October)
CPTHSTP – Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan Update Required December 2024 or 2025
Title VI –Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Update Required February 2023
LAP – Language Assistance Plan Update Required February 2023
PPP – Public Participation Plan Update Required February 2023
Year Qtr MTP TIP UPWP CPTHSTP Title VI LAP PPP
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
2027
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
DRAFT
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY 2022 UPWP 6
Work Element 521 - Program Support & Administration
This task covers the activities necessary to carry out the daily activities of CAMPO in support of the transportation
planning process. These include meeting preparation, UPWP development, public outreach activities, reporting,
and professional development activities.
Objectives / Activities
• Manage CAMPO activities in order to comply with Federal and State administrative
requirements and guidance. Support the operations of the Board of Directors and Technical
Committee, communicate and coordinate with Federal and State agencies on MPO activities,
and support day-to-day operations.
• Develop the annual budget and Unified Planning Work Program along with the preparation
and submittal of UPWP quarterly progress reports, billings, and invoices. Modify UPWP as
needed with approval from the necessary authority.
• Facilitate public participation such as public meetings, hearings and workshops, as needed and
in accordance with the Public Participation Plan. Provide access to CAMPO activities through
maintenance and updating of the CAMPO website.
• Fulfill reporting requirements related to Title VI, Disadvantage Business Enterprise requirements,
project obligation, and other topics as required.
• Professional Development activities, including attendance at relevant training sessions,
educational seminars, meetings, and conferences.
FY 2021 Accomplishments
• Facilitation of Board of Directors and Technical Committee monthly meetings as required.
• FY 2022 UPWP updated.
• Quarterly progress reports completed.
• Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Commitments Semi-Annual reports completed.
• Staff participated in various professional development activities, including MoDOT sponsored
events, webinars, and other training opportunities.
FY 2022 Products
• Board of Directors and Technical Committee meetings administration/facilitation support.
• Meeting agendas, minutes, presentations, reports, and other support material.
• FY 2022 UPWP.
• End of year report, quarterly progress reports, billings, and invoices.
• DBE Commitments Semi-Annual reports.
• Participation in professional development activities.
• Begin review and update of Title VI Program, including Language Assistance Plan and Public
Participation Plan as federally required.
Responsible Party: CAMPO staff
Funding: This work element includes labor costs and all direct costs.
Local Match Funds (20%) $9,014 $5,033 (labor) + $3,981(direct costs)
Federal CPG Funds (80%) $36,057 $20,133 (labor) + $15,924 (direct costs)
Total $45,071
DRAFT
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY 2022 UPWP 7
Work Element 522 - General Development and Comprehensive Planning
Coordination
Not all of the CAMPO member organizations have planning staff or current comprehensive planning
documents in place. In order to facilitate transportation planning by incorporating the vision and goals
for the member organizations and the public, CAMPO will provide assistance in the crafting of the
transportation component of local comprehensive planning documents, as practical. This task may
include the development and maintenance of related spatial and non-spatial data collection and
analysis; examples include land use, demographic data, housing, human services, environmental/natural
resources, recreation/open space, and public facilities.
Objectives / Activities
• Provide technical planning assistance to CAMPO members in the development of the
transportation component of comprehensive and other planning documents, including geospatial
analytical support, local ordinances, and databases.
• Assist jurisdictions in the acquisition and use of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and other
data for use in plans, transportation grant applications, measuring performance, and forecasting
provided by the US Census, MoDOT and others.
FY 2021 Accomplishments
• Technical assistance in various grant application processes in the CAMPO area.
• Provided assistance in the development of local comprehensive plans of member organizations.
• Provided geospatial analysis/data (elevations, demographic, sidewalk, bicycle facilities, street
right-of-way, etc.) to support development, and grant application activities.
FY 2022 Products
• Various inputs for comprehensive planning documents - ongoing for multiple years.
• Various GIS databases.
• Continue providing technical assistance for the transportation component of local planning
documents.
• Assist member jurisdictions with development of local ordinances that may facilitate corridor
preservation and improve efficient network connectivity.
Responsible Party: CAMPO staff and local jurisdictions. Local jurisdictions have ultimate responsibility
for the development and publishing of their planning documents.
Funding: This work element includes only labor costs.
Local Match Funds (20%) $3,524
Federal CPG Funds (80%) $14,094
Total $17,618
DRAFT
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY 2022 UPWP 8
Work Element 523 - Long Range Transportation Planning
This work provides for long-range transportation planning activities, studies, and plans supporting the
transportation planning process out to a minimum of 20 years, for the CAMPO metropolitan planning area, and
may include both system level planning activities and project level activities.
Objectives / Activities
• Keep the MTP current by maintaining and amending components of the plan such as major land
use changes, major road changes, process improvements, funding, or new regulations and
legislation; and any projects to be included into the TIP that are not already listed in the MTP.
• Involve key stakeholders, business community and advocacy groups, environmental
organizations, and the public in long range transportation planning activities to achieve the
long-term transportation goals and vision of the MTP.
• Report MPO performance targets in relation to performance measures for the MTP and TIP.
• Implement the recommendations and strategies as identified in the MTP.
FY 2021 Accomplishments
• Staff, working with MoDOT, continued setting federal performance measures for the TIP and
MTP.
• Worked with the Technical Committee and Board of Directors to implement the MTP strategies.
• Began development of the Thoroughfare Plan, which stands as a component of the MTP.
• Update of the Crash Analysis Report.
• Staff continues development of GIS data and resources to assist jurisdictions with plan
development and implementation.
• Completion of the CAMPO Thoroughfare Plan and insertion of the document into the 2045 &
Beyond Metropolitan Transportation Plan.
FY 2022 Products
• Implementation of the MTP strategies and improvements
• Assist member jurisdictions in implementing recommended improvements outlined in the MTP.
• Maintain the Thoroughfare Plan.
• Amendments to the MTP as necessary.
• Report MTP and TIP performance measures and targets.
• Annual Review of Illustrative List of Projects
Responsible Party: CAMPO staff.
Funding: This work element includes only labor costs.
Local Match Funds (20%) $12,857
Federal CPG Funds (80%) $51,427
Total $64,283
DRAFT
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY 2022 UPWP 9
Work Element 524 - Short Range Transportation Planning & Programming
To identify and address immediate or short term transportation needs which may include non-motorized planning
activities, freight planning, bicycle/pedestrian planning, safety planning, operations and management planning,
transportation security planning, or wayfinding activities.
Objectives / Activities
• Provide support for short-range transportation planning by CAMPO and its members.
• Participate in regional activities regarding freight, safety, security, bicycle/pedestrian, non-
motorized, and other related planning activities.
• Implement the goals and strategies outlined in adopted CAMPO plans:
o Metropolitan Transportation Plan
o Capital Area Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan.
o Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan
o Public Participation Plan
• Maintain the current TIP through the Amendment and Modifications process that meets statutory
requirements, maintain fiscal constraint, and support changing priorities and project scope.
• Continue analysis of safety data to be used in the implementation of recommended
improvements and strategies as outlined in the MTP.
• Be a resource for local jurisdictions seeking to develop an ADA Transition Plan or seeking to
improve mobility and access.
• Develop and adopt the next program year TIP.
• Develop and publish the Annual List of Obligated Projects (ALOP) for 2021-2025 TIP.
FY 2021 Accomplishments
• Participated in activities, meetings and conferences including Missouri Coalition for Roadway
Safety – Central Region and STIP project review/discussions.
• Completed Program Year 2021 – 2025 TIP and any necessary amendments.
• Developed 2022-2026 TIP.
• Provided assistance to member jurisdictions in the completion of grant applications.
• Provided assistance to the Missouri Bicycle and Pedestrian Federation in planning for the 2021
Active Transportation Summit.
• Update of a Crash Analysis Report.
• Began update of Capital Area Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan.
FY 2022 Products
• TIP amendments and administrative modifications as necessary
• Development of the Program Year 2023-2027 TIP.
• Update Crash Data Report.
• Provide guidance and assistance to local jurisdictions in the transportation component of their
ADA Transition Plan development work efforts.
• Annual List of Obligated Projects from the previous program year.
• Assist with planning and possibly hosting of Active Transportation Summit in cooperation with
Missouri Bicycle and Pedestrian Federation.
• Continue update of Capital Area Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan.
Responsible Party: CAMPO staff
Funding: This work element includes only labor costs.
Local Match Funds (20%) $5,009
Federal CPG Funds (80%) $20,035
Total $25,044
DRAFT
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY 2022 UPWP 10
Work Element 526 - Public Transportation Planning
To assist public transportation and transit providers in fulfilling State, Local, and Federal requirements
for coordination and cooperative transportation planning through assistance with plan development,
technical assistance, mapping, data, and GIS functions.
Objectives / Activities
• Continue to assist JEFFTRAN with the maintaining the Route and Schedule Guide, individual route
maps and other tools to serve JEFFTRAN patrons.
• Provide JEFFTRAN mapping, demographic, GIS, planning and other technical assistance in
support of reporting requirements and evaluating possible changes in types of transit services
offered.
• Participate in transit and mobility management planning activities that support the goals and
objectives laid out in the Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan.
• Continue collaboration with other regional transit providers to improve efficiency and access in
Mid-Missouri.
• Update and maintain the Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan.
FY 2021 Accomplishments
• Provided assistance to JEFFTRAN in the update of route guides.
• Completed update of the Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan.
• Development of RFQ and execution of JEFFTRAN Transit Feasibility Study
FY 2022 Products
• Update route and schedule guide as needed.
• Maps, demographics, GIS analytics.
• Improved service to patrons of JEFFTRAN.
• Collaboration with regional transit providers and human service agencies to meet shared goals.
Responsible Party: CAMPO staff.
Funding: This work element includes only labor costs.
Local Match Funds (20%) $7,686
Federal CPG Funds (80%) $30,746
Total $38,432
DRAFT
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY 2022 UPWP 11
Appendix A – Financial Summary
Anticipated Expenditures & Revenue
CAMPO receives funding from the FHWA and FTA 5303 funds through the Consolidated Planning Grant (CPG)
administered by MoDOT. Funding consists of 80% federal and 20% local matching funds; Jefferson City
contributes 75% and Cole County contributes 25%.
Table 1: FY 2022 CAMPO Budget*
*Rounded to the nearest whole number.
** The City of Jefferson covers all the Utility and Capital Purchases expenses, except for some specific software licenses used for
publishing or mapping.
Federal - CPG (80%) Local (20%) Total (100%)
Advertising $1,440 $360 $1,800
Postage $160 $40 $200
Printing $100 $25 $125
Copies $8 $2 $10
Office Supplies $800 $200 $1,000
Food $200 $50 $250
Operational Supplies $1,296 $324 $1,620
Subtotal $4,004 $1,001 $5,005
Dues & Publications $1,200 $300 $1,500
Training/Education $3,600 $900 $4,500
Tuition Reimbursement $2,400 $600 $3,000
Subtotal $7,200 $1,800 $9,000
Vehicle Wash $0 $0 $0
Maintenance Agreement $2,000 $500 $2,500
Subtotal $2,000 $500 $2,500
Equipment/software $2,720 $680 $3,400
Subtotal $2,720 $680 $3,400
Total Direct Costs $15,924 $3,981 $19,905
Salaries plus benefits $136,435 $34,109 $170,544
Total Labor Costs $136,435 $34,109 $170,544
Total MPO Budget $152,359 $38,090 $190,449
Labor Costs
Direct Costs
Materials & Supplies
Other Contracted Services
Equipment Repair and Maintenance
Capital Purchases and Utilities**
DRAFT
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY 2022 UPWP 12
Table 2: FY2021 Work Element Funding Summary - Consolidated Planning Grant and Local Funds
* Numbers are rounded to the nearest whole number. Staff salaries are based on an hourly rate (base + fringe). Staff time allocations
are subject to change as planning activities fluctuate. Note: The MPO Executive Director position is full-time, but is not funded by the MPO
and does not appear in the table above. The MPO Director is also the Director of the Jefferson City Department of Planning and
Protective Services and MPO activities are only a portion of the Director’s job duties. ** Jefferson City will pay 100% of local match
associated with the Transit Feasibility Study
Table 3: FY 2022 Local Match by Jurisdiction
Table 4: Anticipated Available Federal Consolidated Planning Grant (CPG) Balance Revenue
*The final amount of the FY 2021 CPG Allocation will not be released by MoDOT until May of 2021. This UPWP will have been
adopted before this information is made available. Additionally, the MoDOT FY2022 SPR Work Program is also not available until after
adoption of this document. CAMPO staff may make modifications to totals in Table 4 after these allocation amounts are made available.
CAMPO may over-program or under-program annual CPG allocations in order to maintain a CPG
balance to provide flexibility in accommodating large scale planning efforts that may require added
staff or consultant services. Some years may require more funding than others in order to meet MPO
planning goals and federal requirements.
Work Element Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
M
a
n
a
g
e
r
(
.
3
0
F
T
E
)
Pl
a
n
n
e
r
I
I
(
1
F
T
E
)
Pl
a
n
n
e
r
I
(
1
F
T
E
)
Ad
m
i
n
.
A
s
s
t
.
(
.
0
1
5
F
T
E
)
Sub-Total
Total
Federal
CPG Funds
80%
Total
Local
Match
20%Total Pe
r
c
e
n
t
o
f
Wo
r
k
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
B
u
d
g
e
t
521-Program Support & Administration $24,385 $782 $25,167 $20,133 $5,033 $25,167 13%
522-General Develop. and Comp. Planning $9,573 $8,045 $17,618 $14,094 $3,524 $17,618 9%
523-Long Range Transportation Planning $4,434 $35,715 $24,134 $64,283 $51,427 $12,857 $64,283 34%
524-Short Range Transportation Planning $9,573 $15,471 $25,044 $20,035 $5,009 $25,044 13%
526-Public Transportation Planning $21,724 $16,708 $38,432 $30,746 $7,686 $38,432 20%
Labor Costs Subtotal $28,818 $76,585 $64,358 $782 $170,544 $136,435 $34,109 $170,544
$19,905 $15,924 $3,981 $19,905 10%
Total*$152,359 $38,090 $190,449 100%
Labor Costs*
Direct Costs*
521-Direct Costs - Program Support and Administration
Category Jefferson City (75%)Cole County (25%)Total
Labor Costs $25,581.75 $8,527.25 $34,109
521-Direct Costs $2,985.75 $995.25 $3,981
Total $28,567.50 $9,522.50 $38,090
CPG Local Match
CPG Balance for end of FY2020 $468,633
FY 2021 CPG Allocation* $164,888
FY 2021 UPWP CPG Expenditure - Anticipated* -($187,180)
Subtotal $446,341
$0
FY 2022 CPG Allocation - Estimated per MoDOT's FY21 SPR Work Program $164,888
FY 2022 CPG Programmed Expenditure -($152,359)
Remaining Unprogrammed CPG Funds Anticipated at end of FY 2022 $458,870
DRAFT
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY 2022 UPWP 13
Appendix B – CAMPO Boundary Map
The CAMPO Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA) Boundary was approved by the CAMPO Board of
Directors January 16, 2013 and was approved by the Governor of Missouri March 12, 2013. The MPA
includes the jurisdictions of Holts Summit, Jefferson City, St. Martins, Taos, Wardsville, and portions of
unincorporated, non-urbanized areas within Cole and Callaway Counties.
DRAFT
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY 2022 UPWP 14
Appendix C - Modifications and Amendments
There have been no modifications or amendments at this time.
DRAFT
Agenda Item 6C
CAMPO Board of Directors Staff Report
Coordinated Public Transit – Human Services Transportation Plan Update 2021
May 19, 2021
Summary
Staff has produced a draft update of the Coordinated Public Transit – Human Services Transportation Plan
(Coordinated Plan). The Coordinated Plan is required to be updated every four to five years. The last update was
completed in 2017 and the current update process is anticipated to conclude in April of 2021. A draft is attached
to this staff report and is available on the CAMPO website.
Federal transit law, as amended by Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21), and continued
in the Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act), requires that projects selected for funding under
the Section 5310 program be “included in a locally developed, coordinated public transit -human services
transportation plan” and that the plan be “developed and approved through a process that included participation
by seniors, individuals with disabilities, representatives of public, private, and nonprofit transportation and human
services providers and other members of the public.”
The Coordinated Plan includes four components:
1. An assessment of available services that identifies current transportation providers (public,
private, and nonprofit);
2. An assessment of transportation needs for individuals with disabilities and seniors. This
assessment can be based on the experiences and perceptions of the planning partners or on more
sophisticated data collection efforts, and gaps in service;
3. Strategies, activities, and/or projects to address the identified gaps between current services and
needs, as well as opportunities to achieve efficiencies in service delivery; and
4. Priorities for implementation based on resources (from multiple program sources), time, and
feasibility for implementing specific strategies and/or activities identified.
A public survey closed in January with 50 responses. A stakeholder survey closed in February with 17 responses.
A stakeholder meeting was held February 18th and a final public meeting will be held April 6th.
Please refer questions or comments to Katrina Williams at 573-634-6536 or at kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org.
Public Comment
A 25-day public comment period was opened April 22nd. A comment was received from Dion Knipp (OATS,
Inc.). These suggested edits are reflected in the attached draft document.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends adoption of the 2021 Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan.
Recommended Form of Motion:
Motion to close the public comment period and adopt the 2021 Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services
Transportation Plan.
Coordinated
Public Transit -Human Services
Transportation Plan
The preparation of this report was financed in part by the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal
Highway Administration, and Federal Transit Administration in cooperation with the Missouri Department of
Transportation. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this report are not necessarily those of the
Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Administration, or the Missouri Department of Transportation.
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative
formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the
request.
Please call (573) 634-6410 with questions regarding agenda items.
DRAFT
DRAFT
Acknowledgement:
Thank you to all those who took the time and effort to attend public meetings, respond to questions and
surveys, and attend working meetings. The plan was made possible through the dedication of local
stakeholders, the CAMPO Board of Directors, the CAMPO Technical Committee, and the residents of the
CAMPO Region this plan would not be possible.
CAMPO staff wishes to thank those who participated in the development of the plan.
Plan Produced by the Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization
CAMPO Administration is provided by the City of Jefferson
Department of Planning and Protective Services/ Planning Division
Room 120 John G. Christy Municipal Building
320 East McCarty Jefferson City, Missouri
Telephone 573-634-6410
http://www.jeffersoncitymo.gov/campo/
DRAFT
Resolution
DRAFT
Contents
Introduction ___________________________________________________________________ 1
The Planning Process __________________________________________________________ 1
Progress since 2017 ____________________________________________________________ 1
2020-2021 COVID-19 Impacts __________________________________________________ 1
Analysis of Special Needs Populations __________________________________________ 2
Existing Services _______________________________________________________________ 8
Identified Unmet Transportation Needs, Gaps, and Overlaps ____________________ 13
2021 Strategies _______________________________________________________________ 15
Recommendations for Continued Coordination ________________________________ 14
Public Outreach/Public Participation __________________________________________ 14
Appendix 1: Stakeholder Survey Responses ____________________________________ 16
Appendix 2: Public Survey Responses __________________________________________ 17
Appendix 3: Definitions _______________________________________________________ 18
Appendix 4: Affected Programs _______________________________________________ 20
Appendix 5: MODOT Federal Funding Programs ________________________________ 22
CAMPO Title VI Nondiscrimination Policy
The Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization is committed to the policy that no person shall be
excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under
any program or activity on the grounds of race, color, sex, age, disability or national origin, in accordance
with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 (P.L. 100.259).
Administration of the Capital Area MPO is provided by:
City of Jefferson Department of Planning and Protective Services
Room 120 John G. Christy Municipal Building
320 East McCarty St., Jefferson City, Missouri 65101
Phone: (573) 634-6410 Fax: (573) 634-6457
http://www.jeffersoncitymo.gov/campo
DRAFT
CAMPO 2021 Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan 1
Introduction
The Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services
Transportation Plan (Coordinated Plan) is a locally
developed plan that identifies the transportation
needs of individuals with disabilities, seniors and
people with low incomes, provides strategies for
meeting those needs, and prioritizes transportation
services for funding and implementation. The plan is
updated at least every four to five years per
federal regulations.
In accordance with Fixing America’s Surface
Transportation Act (FAST Act), Federal transit law
requires that projects selected for funding under the
Enhanced Mobility for Individuals and Individuals
with Disabilities (Section 5310) Program be
"included in a locally developed, coordinated public
transit-human services transportation plan," and that
the plan be "developed and approved through a
process that included participation by seniors,
individuals with disabilities, representatives of
public, private, and nonprofit transportation and
human services providers and other members of the
public" utilizing transportation services. The
Coordinated Plan identifies the transportation needs
of individuals with disabilities, older adults, and
people with low incomes, and identifies and
prioritize strategies to address these needs.
The Planning Process
The Coordinated Plan was developed through a
combination of meetings, surveys, and discussions
with stakeholders. Stakeholders include public and
private transportation providers, human service
providers, representatives of individuals with
disabilities, and other local, regional, and state
agencies.
The plan includes the following elements:
• An assessment of available services that
identifies current transportation providers
(public, private, and nonprofit)
• An assessment of transportation needs for
individuals with disabilities and seniors.
• Development of implementation strategies
and/or activities to address the identified gaps
between current services and needs, as well as
opportunities to achieve efficiencies in service
delivery.
• Prioritization of implementation strategies
and/or activities based on resources, time, and
feasibility.
Progress since 2017
Service areas have remained consistent among
agencies and providers. Coordination among
providers exists in the form of a handful of local
and regional committees such as the Unmet Needs
Committee in Jefferson City, the Missouri Public
Transit Association, and regional planning
organizations such as Mid-MO Regional Planning
Commission and CAMPO.
Funding levels have not improved for most agencies
and the financial burden of the 2020 COVID-19
Pandemic put increased stress on providers and the
public in general.
Many agencies have integrated new technology to
assist with routing, dispatching, reporting and
monitoring.
JEFFTRAN installed new Automatic Vehicle Locators
(AVL), Passenger Counters, and Voice Annunciators.
A new AVL kiosk is located outside the main transit
facility on Miller St. Minor changes to routes in 2019
and plans to make more changes to software and
hardware in 2021-2022 include a new fare
collection system.
OATS finished upgrades to their scheduling software
in 2020.
2020-2021 COVID-19 Impacts
In March of 2020 the COVID-19 pandemic and
subsequent Centers for Disease Control (CDC)
guidelines were implemented in Missouri.
Several agencies and organizations made
changes to their daily operations in response to
the CDC guidelines. These changes included
increased cleaning and disinfecting protocols,
quarantine of staff due to exposure or illness,
reduction in staff levels, teleworking, and changes
to allowable non-medical destinations.
Some transit agencies increased numbers of trips
to accommodate social-distance requirements in
buses and vans. Many transit providers installed
plexiglass barriers in vehicles and mandated
mask use for passengers.
In the first few months of the pandemic transit
ridership decreased dramatically. Low ridership
levels combined with costs related to increased
cleaning protocols and safety measures put a
substantial burden on agency budgets and staff.
Driver retention and staff shortage was major
challenge during the pandemic. Many drivers for
the major transit provider such as OATS, SERVE,
DRAFT
CAMPO 2021 Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan 2
and JEFFTRAN, are retirement age or older.
Some agencies use volunteers who are often
retired older adults. Because older adults were
identified as a high-risk group for contracting
COVID-19, many temporarily or permanently left
their positions. Quarantine requirements also
added to staff shortages.
Analysis of Special Needs
Populations
The Coordinated Plan is required to address the
transportation needs of the elderly, low-income
individuals and households, and those with
disabilities within the CAMPO region. While the
general public also uses public transportation, the
aforementioned demographics are those most
impacted by access to transportation services.
Without transportation services access to many basic
amenities and services may be limited for these key
populations.
Figures 1 and 2 provide a general overview of
population totals in the CAMPO Region. Jefferson
City has the highest proportion of population and
density in the CAMPO region.
FIGURE 1 –POPULATIONS BY JURISDICTION
Jurisdiction Population
City of Jefferson 42,708
St. Martins 1,159
Taos 1,349
Wardsville 1,878
Holts Summit 4,193
Cole County (Total Population) 76,723
Callaway County (Total Population) 44,889
CAMPO Planning Area 77,727*
Source: U.S. Census Bureau – 2019 5-YR ACS
*This estimate was developed during the 2019
Metropolitan Transportation Plan update. ACS
population estimates are only available at the block
group level, which is not aligned with the CAMPO
Boundary.
DRAFT
CAMPO 2021 Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan 3
FIGURE 2 – POPULATION DENSITY
DRAFT
CAMPO 2021 Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan 4
MINORITY POPULATIONS
Figure 3 shows the distribution of minority populations within the CAMPO planning area. The core, and
historically oldest sections of Jefferson City, has the highest density of minorities.
FIGURE 3 – PERCENT OF MINORITY POPULATIONS BY CENSUS TRACT
DRAFT
CAMPO 2021 Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan 5
LOW-INCOME (POVERTY) POPULATIONS
Low-income or poverty is determined by the federal poverty guidelines and are represented by individuals living
below 185% of the poverty line, which are generated annually based on family size and composition. Low-
income individuals and families may be more likely to seek public transportation or other transportation
alternatives to automobiles. Figure 4 depicts the percent of low-income populations within the CAMPO planning
area.
The inner core of Jefferson City has block groups with significantly higher percentages, 21% to 35%, of persons
living below the poverty line than in the outlying area.
FIGURE 4 - PERCENT OF LOW-INCOME (POVERTY) POPULATIONS BY CENSUS TRACT
DRAFT
CAMPO 2021 Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan 6
ELDERLY (65 YEARS AND OLDER) POPULATION
Figure 5 shows the distribution of the elderly population within the CAMPO planning area.
As the “Baby Boomer” generation (individuals born in the United States between mid-1946 and mid-1964)
continues to reach retirement age, municipalities across the country are faced with the transportation needs of an
increasingly aging population. The western portion of the planning area and much of the surrounding rural area
has higher percentages of elderly individuals.
FIGURE 5 – PERCENT OF ELDERLY (65 YEARS AND OLDER) POPULATION BY CENSUS TRACT
DRAFT
CAMPO 2021 Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan 7
INDIVIDUALS WITH A DISABILITY
Figure 6 shows the distribution of individuals with disabilities within the CAMPO planning area. Persons with
disabilities often time have an increased challenge in accessing transportation infrastructure and should be a
priority consideration when planning for coordination and transportation access. It should be noted when looking
at the map below, southern portions of Boone County and Callaway County have low population density and
generally skew older in age. Central Jefferson City has a higher population density and generally highlights the
oldest neighborhoods in the urban area.
FIGURE 6 – PERCENT OF INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES BY CENSUS TRACT
DRAFT
CAMPO 2021 Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan 8
Existing Services
There are more than 75 stakeholder agencies or
businesses operating in the CAMPO region. This
total includes at least 13 transportation service
providers. Due to the location of State
government offices in Jefferson City, many state
agencies and human service agencies are
headquartered in the CAMPO planning area.
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SERVICES
There are three agencies that provide public
transportation services within the CAMPO region.
These agencies contract and coordinate with many
human services organizations to address the
transportation needs in their respective areas. All
agree that funding constraints impede further
expansion of services. However, most
organizations and agencies polled are open to
coordinated efforts between agencies.
JEFFTRAN
JEFFTRAN provides both fixed-route and
paratransit services with the City of Jefferson. The
fixed-route system consists of six routes operating
between approximately 6:30 a.m. and 6:00 p.m.
Monday through Friday. Paratransit
(Handiwheels) operates during the same time and
provides a curb to curb service for eligible
individuals with disabilities. Additionally, three
“Tripper” routes operate during the school year,
providing free after school transportation for
school aged children. JEFFTRAN is a Division within
the Department of Public Works, and the City
Council is its governing body. Funding to operate
JEFFTRAN comes from the City of Jefferson,
Federal Transit Administration Section 5307
(Urbanized Area Formula Funding program),
passenger fares/ridership fees, and Missouri
Department of Transportation (MODOT).
JEFFTRAN provides transportation for roughly
300,000 passengers per year. Fixed route rides
cost $1.00 and students can buy a 20-ride bus
pass for $18. Children 5 and under ride for free
with an adult, and there is no charge for transfers.
People over 60 and/or those who have Medicare
cards are eligible for a half-price fare pass.
Handiwheels regularly operates up to eight
accessible cutaway vans, and provides as many as
250 riders each day with curb to curb service.
Individuals with disabilities that cannot travel fixed
routes are potentially eligible for Handiwheels.
Applications are available at City Hall, at
JEFFTRAN’s administrative offices, or by request
via US Mail. The cost to ride Handiwheels is $2
per ride and Medicare passes are honored.
Drivers provide assistance to clients getting into
and out of the vehicle as well as securing
wheelchairs. Ridership fees and contracts with
Missouri Department of Social Services and Cole
County Residential Services provide some funds for
Handiwheels operation. Fares and ridership fees
make up 22% of the operational budget. Capital
funds come from a variety of Federal Transit
Administration (FTA) programs. Local funds are
required to match these federal programs, and
usually comes from the City’s Capital Improvement
Program (CIP) sales tax.
JEFFTRAN transports clients on behalf of many
different human service agencies. Among these
agencies are Cole County Special Services,
(CCSS), Department of Mental Health, (DMH),
Department of Social Services, (DSS), Easter Seals,
Job Point, New Horizons, and Vocational
Rehabilitation (VR). Agencies like Central Missouri
Community Action (CMCA), Common Ground
Community Center, the Samaritan Center,
Salvation Army and Jefferson City Nursing &
Rehabilitation Center serve clients who regularly
use JEFFTRAN.
In a 2016 survey of transit riders, 95% of
respondents rated JEFFTRAN’s service as “good”
or better. To view JEFFTRAN bus schedules and
route maps, please visit to www.jefftran.org.
OATS
OATS is a private not-for profit transportation
provider for the general public that serves 87
counties in the state of Missouri including within the
CAMPO planning area. OATS provides
transportation regardless of age, disability, or
income. Riders use OATS for essential shopping,
nutrition, personal business, recreation,
employment, and medical purposes. Using four
vehicles in Cole and Callaway Counties, OATS
provided 5,022 trips in FY 2019. To view OATS
bus schedules go to www.oatstransit.org.
OATS is funded through FTA grants, Medicaid,
Missouri Elderly and Handicapped Transportation
Assistance Program, (MEHTAP), county government,
city governments, Department of Mental Health,
service contracts and rider fares. Fares are $2
one-way in city limits, $5 one-way in the county,
and $4 one-way to adjacent counties.
SERVETRAN/SERVE, INC.
SERVETRAN – SERVE, Inc. is a private not-for-
profit agency that provides transportation in
Callaway County to qualified elderly, disabled,
DRAFT
CAMPO 2021 Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan 9
low-income, and youth Monday through Friday.
The fleet of nine vehicles includes nine wheelchair-
equipped buses and two 17 passenger van
equipped with mobile radios. SERVETRAN
provides door to door transportation to dialysis,
medical appointments, physical therapy, errands,
beauty shops, work, and shopping. SERVETRAN
also refers clients to OATS and has a Non-
Emergency Medical Transportation contract to
work with taxi cab companies for out of county
trips. On average, SERVETRAN provides 3,000
one-way trips a month and 22,000 miles per
month.
SERVETRAN has an annual operating budget of
over $400,000 and its funding sources come from
State, Federal and local agencies. Many of the
trips SERVETRAN provides are paid for by
contracts, grants, and private pay fees, donations,
etc. Their office staff will work with individuals to
ascertain eligibility and or make the proper
referrals to the funding sources they already have
in place. SERVETRAN also receives operating
assistance funding through FTA Section 5311
(Formula Grants for Rural Areas) that is
administered by MODOT. Their basic service
area includes: Fulton, a 30 mile radius into
adjacent Audrain, Boone, and Cole counties, and
can travel farther for necessary medical
appointments through Non-Emergency Medical
Transportation (NEMT). Individuals who are not
eligible for or not enrolled in any of these funding
programs are eligible for transportation services
pending the assessment by office staff of being
able to pay the nominal fee. The fare for
ambulatory persons residing in Fulton and
traveling within the city limits is $1.50 round trip.
Fares for travel within Callaway County are $10
round trip. For ambulatory persons residing in
town and traveling to Columbia, Jefferson City, or
Mexico the fee is $20 round trip and must be
scheduled ahead of time.
To view SERVE bus schedules and to make
schedule a ride, please go to
https://serveinc.net/programs/transportation/.
STAKEHOLDER SURVEYS
Stakeholder Surveys were sent to more than 90
identified stakeholders to gather information on
capacity, needs, and/or gaps in service. All of the
agencies self-identified as specifically serving the
elderly, disabled or low-income populations. The
survey asked about clientele, vehicles, operations,
and asked stakeholders to review the 2017
strategies. The December 2020 survey also
included a question about COVID-19 impacts on
agency operations.
Seventeen agencies responded to the survey:
• American Legion
• Big Brothers Big Sisters
• Callaway Senior Center
• Integrated Benefits Inc (IBI)
• Jefferson City Area YMCA
• Jefferson City Housing Authority
• JEFFTRAN
• Job Point
• Liberty Senior Citizens Home
• Maplewood Residential Center
• National Alliance of Mental Health
(NAMI) Missouri
• Oak Tree Villas
• OATS, Inc.
• Rape & Abuse Crisis Service
• SERVE, Inc.
• St. Martins Knights of Columbus
When asked about major transportation needs,
several respondents stated additional buses and
driver training are needed. Respondents also
identified improvements to coordinated
use/scheduling of vehicles and identification of
funding opportunities as areas that would be
benefited by improved interagency coordination.
The results of the Stakeholder survey can be
found in Appendix 1.
DRAFT
CAMPO 2021 Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan 10
PUBLIC SURVEYS
Forty-six public surveys were received at the
beginning of the planning process. Due to the
COVID-19 pandemic, staff was not able to
conduct the same level of in-person public
outreach as in years past. Most survey responses
were received in response to email or social media
outreach.
At least 59% of survey respondents work in
Jefferson City and 74% live in Jefferson City.
While 93% of respondents hold a valid drivers
license, 55% have used public transit, taxis, or
ride-shares in the past year, with most of them
(20%) using it for work.
When asked, “What changes could be made in
public transit services that would
make you want to ride?”, the top two response
were increased service hours and increased
weekend service.
The results of the public survey can be found in
Appendix 2.
DRAFT
CAMPO 2021 Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan 11
FIGURE 7 – SERVICES AGENCIES PROVIDE TO CLIENTS
Lo
c
a
l
H
u
m
a
n
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
&
Pu
b
l
i
c
T
r
a
n
s
.
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
r
s
Pa
r
a
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
r
s
Na
m
e
o
f
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
r
P
u
b
l
i
c
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
r
s
A
D
A
P
a
r
a
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
T
a
x
i
C
a
b
s
R
e
c
o
v
e
r
y
A
d
d
i
c
t
i
o
n
/
S
u
b
s
t
a
n
c
e
A
b
u
s
e
R
e
c
o
v
e
r
y
C
o
u
n
s
e
l
i
n
g
P
e
r
s
o
n
s
w
i
t
h
D
i
s
a
b
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
(
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
)
P
e
r
s
o
n
s
w
i
t
h
D
i
s
a
b
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
(
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
l
)
P
e
r
s
o
n
s
w
i
t
h
D
i
s
a
b
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
(
P
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
o
r
L
e
g
a
l
A
s
s
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
)
E
l
d
e
r
l
y
E
m
p
l
o
y
m
e
n
t
L
o
w
I
n
c
o
m
e
N
o
n
-
E
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
M
e
d
i
c
a
l
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
S
o
c
i
a
l
R
e
i
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
Y
o
u
t
h
36
0
Q
u
a
l
i
t
y
C
a
r
e
&
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
✓
✓
✓
Ag
i
n
g
B
e
s
t
✓
Am
e
r
i
c
a
n
C
a
n
c
e
r
S
o
c
i
e
t
y
✓
AM
T
R
A
K
✓
As
s
i
s
t
e
d
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
✓
Br
i
d
g
e
w
a
y
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
C
a
r
e
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
✓
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
A
r
e
a
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
A
g
e
n
c
y
✓
Ca
p
i
t
a
l
C
i
t
y
A
r
e
a
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
f
o
r
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
Se
r
v
i
c
e
s
✓
Ca
r
r
c
o
L
L
C
E
M
T
✓
Ce
n
t
r
a
l
M
i
s
s
o
u
r
i
A
r
e
a
A
g
e
n
c
y
o
n
A
g
i
n
g
✓
Ce
n
t
r
a
l
M
i
s
s
o
u
r
i
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
A
c
t
i
o
n
✓
✓
Ch
a
s
e
L
i
m
o
u
s
i
n
e
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
,
I
n
c
.
✓
Ch
e
c
k
e
r
C
a
b
o
f
J
e
f
f
e
r
s
o
n
C
i
t
y
✓
Co
l
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
,
I
n
c
.
✓
Di
s
a
b
l
e
d
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n
V
e
t
e
r
a
n
s
(
D
A
V
)
✓
✓
✓
✓
DW
A
u
t
o
&
H
o
m
e
M
o
b
i
l
i
t
y
✓
Fu
l
t
o
n
P
r
e
s
b
y
t
e
r
i
a
n
M
a
n
o
r
✓
Fu
l
t
o
n
S
e
n
i
o
r
C
e
n
t
e
r
✓
✓
Fu
l
t
o
n
T
a
x
i
✓
Gr
e
y
h
o
u
n
d
✓
Ha
n
d
i
-
W
h
e
e
l
s
(
O
p
e
r
a
t
e
d
b
y
J
E
F
F
T
R
A
N
)
✓
✓
✓
He
i
s
i
n
g
e
r
B
l
u
f
f
s
/
S
t
.
J
o
s
e
p
h
'
s
H
o
u
s
e
✓
I
n
d
e
p
e
n
d
e
n
t
L
i
v
i
n
g
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
C
e
n
t
e
r
✓
Je
f
f
e
r
s
o
n
C
i
t
y
A
r
e
a
Y
M
C
A
✓
Je
f
f
e
r
s
o
n
C
i
t
y
N
u
r
s
i
n
g
a
n
d
R
e
h
a
b
i
l
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
Ce
n
t
e
r
✓
✓
JE
F
F
T
R
A
N
✓
Jo
b
P
o
i
n
t
✓
✓
✓
Li
b
e
r
t
y
S
e
n
i
o
r
C
i
t
i
z
e
n
s
H
o
m
e
,
I
n
c
.
✓
Lo
g
i
s
t
i
c
a
r
e
✓
Ma
p
l
e
w
o
o
d
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
C
e
n
t
e
r
✓
Ty
p
e
o
f
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
r
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
Tr
a
n
s
i
t
Hu
m
a
n
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
r
s
DRAFT
CAMPO 2021 Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan 12
FIGURE 7 – SERVICES AGENCIES PROVIDE TO CLIENTS CONT…
Lo
c
a
l
H
u
m
a
n
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
&
Pu
b
l
i
c
T
r
a
n
s
.
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
r
s
Pa
r
a
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
r
s
Na
m
e
o
f
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
r
P
u
b
l
i
c
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
r
s
A
D
A
P
a
r
a
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
T
a
x
i
C
a
b
s
R
e
c
o
v
e
r
y
A
d
d
i
c
t
i
o
n
/
S
u
b
s
t
a
n
c
e
A
b
u
s
e
R
e
c
o
v
e
r
y
C
o
u
n
s
e
l
i
n
g
P
e
r
s
o
n
s
w
i
t
h
D
i
s
a
b
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
(
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
)
P
e
r
s
o
n
s
w
i
t
h
D
i
s
a
b
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
(
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
l
)
P
e
r
s
o
n
s
w
i
t
h
D
i
s
a
b
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
(
P
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
o
r
L
e
g
a
l
A
s
s
i
s
t
a
n
c
e
)
E
l
d
e
r
l
y
E
m
p
l
o
y
m
e
n
t
L
o
w
I
n
c
o
m
e
N
o
n
-
E
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
M
e
d
i
c
a
l
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
S
o
c
i
a
l
R
e
i
n
t
e
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
Y
o
u
t
h
Me
d
i
c
a
l
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
,
I
n
c
.
(M
T
M
)
✓
✓
Mi
s
s
o
u
r
i
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
o
f
C
o
r
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
:
Pr
o
b
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
P
a
r
o
l
e
✓
Mi
s
s
o
u
r
i
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
o
f
S
o
c
i
a
l
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
:
Ch
i
l
d
r
e
n
'
s
D
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
✓
Mi
s
s
o
u
r
i
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
o
f
S
o
c
i
a
l
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
:
MO
H
e
a
l
t
h
N
e
t
✓
✓
✓
✓
Mi
s
s
o
u
r
i
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
f
o
r
t
h
e
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
l
l
y
D
i
s
a
b
l
e
d
✓
Mi
s
s
o
u
r
i
P
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
&
A
d
v
o
c
a
c
y
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
,
I
n
c
.
✓
Ne
w
H
o
r
i
z
o
n
s
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
S
u
p
p
o
r
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
,
I
n
c
.
✓
OA
T
S
I
n
c
.
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Pa
t
h
w
a
y
s
B
e
h
a
v
i
o
r
a
l
H
e
a
l
t
h
✓
Pr
e
f
e
r
r
e
d
F
a
m
i
l
y
H
e
a
l
t
h
C
a
r
e
✓
✓
✓
✓
Py
r
a
m
i
d
H
o
m
e
H
e
a
l
t
h
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
✓
Ra
p
e
&
A
b
u
s
e
C
r
i
s
i
s
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
✓
Ri
v
e
r
v
i
e
w
N
u
r
s
i
n
g
C
e
n
t
e
r
✓
Sa
l
v
a
t
i
o
n
A
r
m
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
o
f
h
o
p
e
✓
✓
✓
SE
R
V
E
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
✓
Se
r
v
i
c
e
s
f
o
r
I
n
d
e
p
e
n
d
e
n
t
L
i
v
i
n
g
✓
Sh
o
w
-
M
e
M
e
d
i
c
a
l
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
✓
SS
M
H
o
m
e
C
a
r
e
&
H
o
s
p
i
c
e
✓
St
a
t
e
o
f
M
i
s
s
o
u
r
i
D
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
o
f
V
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
Re
h
a
b
i
l
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
✓
St
a
t
e
o
f
M
i
s
s
o
u
r
i
R
e
h
a
b
i
l
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
t
o
th
e
B
l
i
n
d
✓
St
o
n
e
B
r
i
d
g
e
S
e
n
i
o
r
L
i
v
i
n
g
✓
✓
Th
e
T
r
o
l
l
e
y
C
o
m
p
a
n
y
✓
Un
i
t
e
d
C
e
r
e
b
r
a
l
P
a
l
s
y
H
e
a
r
t
l
a
n
d
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Ve
t
e
r
a
n
s
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
(
V
T
S
)
✓
Ty
p
e
o
f
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
r
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
Tr
a
n
s
i
t
Hu
m
a
n
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
r
s
DRAFT
CAMPO 2021 Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation 13
Identified Unmet Transportation
Needs, Gaps, and Overlaps
Public and stakeholder surveys and comments
provided a basis for the items outlined in this section.
NEEDS/GAPS/OVERLAPS IN SERVICE
The following unmet transportation needs and gaps
in service were identified. Additionally, most of the
items listed below have been identified in the last
three iterations of this plan.
• Additional funds are needed for capital
investment and transportation service operation.
• Coordinated programs of transportation
providers, employers, and human service
agencies is lacking.
• Public and stakeholders desire expanded service
hours and service areas to address evening and
weekend travel needs (i.e. work, personal,
recreational, and program related
transportation)
• Public transportation coverage outside City of
Jefferson limits is lacking.
• Public transportation agencies feel that state
spending towards public transportation is
insufficient.
• Agencies may be operating multiple vehicles for
similar purposes resulting in overlaps of service.
• Funding for capital and operational expenses
via state and federal agencies needs more
flexibility to allow for cooperative procurement
agreements.
• During times of emergency declarations or crisis,
hazard pay for transit staff should be
considered.
COORDINATION
Agency representatives have expressed a need for
more coordination and communication between
transportation providers, human service agencies,
and employers. Many stakeholders still believe that
there is a need for further coordination between all
affected agencies.
Agencies emphasized that despite the fact that
JEFFTRAN has bus routes through major sections of
Jefferson City there remains a gap in the scope of
coordination in transportation, employer, and human
service programs. Some businesses and industry
sectors have work shifts that span a 24-hour period.
These workers have very limited in transportation
options, especially those working second and third
shifts. Some agencies have program meetings that
start after 5:00 pm and expressed interest in
improving coordination to better assist clients.
DEMAND
There is a lack of public and private transportation
options after 5pm. While the highest demand for
transportation is between the hours of 8 AM and 5
PM, agencies expressed the need for extended hours
of service including evenings and weekends. Agency
participants have communicated that their clients
have a hard time getting to and from work using the
public transportation system. Usually they can get to
work but have to find an alternative way of getting
home. Others say that their clients have personal
and program activities after 5pm. Activities such as
religious services, group meetings, and visiting family
tend to happen after business hours across all
demographics. Past survey results show that most
agencies have a peak in their vehicle usage between
8am and 4pm leaving vehicles not in use after 4pm.
Ridesharing was identified as being more or less
comparable in cost to a taxi service, which is often
too expensive for clients of many of the human
service agencies.
FUNDING
According to the Missouri Public Transit Association
(MPTA), in 2019 “State funding is at a record low.
Missouri ranks 47th in the country for state funding
for transit.”
Additional funding is needed for expanding service
operations. For example, some agencies have
outdated wheelchair lifts on their vans and would like
to replace them. Agencies that serve people with
disabilities may have difficulty with insurance
coverage due to high premiums. Insurance
companies and funding resources restrict usage when
the contract is tied to a program instead of a need.
This creates a system in which multiple agencies are
providing transportation for the same purposes and
to the same locations but only for their specific client
base. This type of duplication may be more efficient
for insurers and agencies dealing with scheduling, but
it is an inefficient use of fuel, equipment, labor and it
increases expenses. The restrictions are barriers to
coordination in many cases and agency
representatives have identified a need for more
funding resources. Public Transportation Agencies
also expressed a desire to see more funding support
from the state, via the state legislature. The need for
funding is felt by all the agencies needing to expand
their capital and operational resources.
DRAFT
CAMPO 2021 Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation 14
Mobility Management
Between 2015 and 2017, the Mid-Missouri Regional
Planning Commission and Central Missouri Community
Action, working with funding assistance from the
Missouri Developmental Disabilities Council, hired a
mobility manager for the Mid-Missouri region (which
includes the entire CAMPO region). While there was
success in improving coordination and providing more
support to the public in assistance finding rides, the
position was not retained after the grant funding
ended. This grant funding also supported the
creation of MO Rides, administered by the Boonslick
Regional Planning Commission. Their website,
www.morides.org, provides transportation service
information to the public and human service agencies.
Funding support for MO Rides is provided by
MoDOT and the Developmental Disabilities Resource
Board of St. Charles County.
MO Rides now serves as a resource across Missouri.
More funding for state-wide mobility management
services continues to be an identified need in the
area.
COVERAGE
Several agencies expressed a need for regularly
scheduled services to be available for rural residents
to get into Jefferson City for work, shopping, and
more distant cities like Columbia, Kansas City, and St.
Louis for medical appointments. There is still a gap
in the services available for the general public
outside city limits. SERVETRAN serves elderly,
disabled, and low-income populations in Callaway
County and regularly transports them to Jefferson
City and Columbia on weekdays by appointment.
Cab companies and ride sharing services are often
too expensive for regular use and OATS, according
to the agency representative, is often mistaken for a
service that just provides rides for older adults.
Agency representatives agree that expansion of
geographic coverage or regular scheduled trips from
rural areas to larger cities for medical treatments,
personal trips, and job access would require more
money and/or dramatic coordination efforts.
UNIQUE SITUATIONS
Agency representatives have communicated many
special case transportation needs for their clients.
Human service agencies serve a wide range of
demographics which create many unique demands.
With medical research facilities located in larger
cities, specialized treatments can be difficult to
receive, especially for those not covered by
Medicaid and those who do not have flexible work
schedules. The concept of coordination is seen as a
positive approach to addressing the barriers and
gaps in service.
Recommendations for Continued
Coordination
Coordination plays a significant role in the function
and purpose of CAMPO. It is also heavily
emphasized at the federal, state, and local levels of
transportation planning.
CAMPO will include continuing coordination and
planning as described by the Coordinated Plan
through inclusion of coordinated human services
transportation planning in the three documents that
CAMPO is required to produce; the Unified Planning
Work Program, the Transportation Improvement
Program, and the Metropolitan Transportation Plan.
CAMPO will also support utilization of funding under
FTA Section 5310 and through projects derived from
the strategies of this Coordinated Plan.
CAMPO will act as a resource in facilitating
coordination among providers and will provide staff
support, as available, in assisting stakeholders in
implementing the strategies laid out in this plan.
Public Outreach/Public
Participation
A virtual stakeholder meeting was held in February
18, 2021 and public meeting was held April 6,
2021. Due to the COVID-19 health crisis, virtual
options for gathering comments were used in
combination with in-person events. Surveys and
invitations to a stakeholder meeting were sent to
human service agencies and transportation providers.
Meetings and surveys were advertised through social
media, via mass email notification, posted letters,
and through the News Tribune.
The draft plan was presented to the CAMPO
Technical Committee and Board of Directors for their
review and 25-day public comment period was
opened in April 2021.
DRAFT
CAMPO 2021 Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation 15
2021 Strategies
The following strategies were identified to address the needs and challenges listed above. The strategies were
rated and prioritized by stakeholders based on resources, time, and feasibility. The strategies were then placed in
two classes, short-range and long-range.
SHORT-RANGE – 1-2 YEARS TO IMPLEMENT OR ARE CURRENTLY BEING IMPLEMENTED. MORE RESOURCES, FUNDING,
OR STAFF WOULD IMPROVE THE SUCCESS OF THESE STRATEGIES.
1A Promote and secure funding for expansion of services and programs.
1B Develop partnerships with public and private stakeholders to improve access and use of transit.
1C Seek and support coordination opportunities among transportation providers, human service agencies, and
other regional stakeholders.
1D Develop and maintain a directory of human service agencies and transportation providers, which will
include federal, state, and local government contacts.
1E Create educational campaigns to encourage people to return to using transit following the COVID-19
Pandemic.
LONG-RANGE – 2-5 YEARS TO IMPLEMENT AND REQUIRE FINANCIAL RESOURCES OR STAFFING THAT IS CURRENTLY
UNAVAILABLE.
2A Develop public and private incentives to increase transit use.
2B Integrate new technologies that will improve transit use and accessibility.
2C
Educate the public, elected officials, and other stakeholders about available transit services. Possible tools
include: creation of a coordination staff position, directory, or website; marketing campaign; brochures;
press releases and/or public service announcements
2D Develop a transit focus group(s) to support growth of transit use.
2E Pursue cooperative procurement agreements where feasible.
2F Develop policies and protocols that improve driver retention.
DRAFT
Appendix 1: Stakeholder Survey Responses
https://cms4.revize.com/revize/jeffersonmo/CAMPO/All_Stakeholder_Summary_Data02012021.pdf
DRAFT
Appendix 2: Public Survey Responses
https://cms4.revize.com/revize/jeffersonmo/CAMPO/Survey%20Results%20January%202021.pdf
DRAFT
Appendix 3: Definitions
Brokerage (also referred to as Transportation Brokerage) means any entity that takes trip requests and distributes
the trips to more than one service provider.
Brokerages come in all sizes, with different functions and levels of responsibility. Some brokerages are
statewide (either for-profit or state operated); others are regional or “community based” (including many transit
agencies). The regional and community-based broker is typically in charge of all aspects of the local program,
including trip and client eligibility verification, trip assignment, scheduling, billing, and monitoring.
Missouri is one of three states among those surveyed for the TCRP (Transit Agency Participation in Medicaid
Transportation Programs) Synthesis 65 study that used a single statewide broker.
Chief Executive Officer of a State means the Governor of any of the 50 States or Puerto Rico, the Northern
Mariana Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and the U.S. Virgin Islands, the Mayor of the District of Columbia, or
his/her designee.
Complementary Paratransit is a requirement of ADA— each transit system that operates fixed-route service must
operate paratransit within three-quarters of a mile of the fixed route. There are no restrictions on the use of this
service other than an eligibility requirement.
Elderly Individual includes, at a minimum, all persons 65 years of age or older. Grantees may use a definition that
extends eligibility for service to younger (e.g., 62 and older, 60 and over) persons.
Fixed-route service is typically found in most cities and employs buses following a designated route according to a
timetable. Passengers come to the bus stop to wait for the bus. Virtually all fixed-route buses are wheelchair
accessible.
Human Service Transportation means transportation services provided by or on behalf of a human service agency
to provide access to agency services and/or to meet the basic, day-to-day mobility needs of transportation-
disadvantaged populations, especially individuals with disabilities, older adults, and people with low incomes.
Individual With a Disability means an individual who, because of illness, injury, age, congenital malfunction, or
other incapacity or temporary or permanent disability (including an individual who is a wheelchair user or has
semi-ambulatory capability), cannot use effectively, without special facilities, planning, or design, public
transportation service or a public transportation facility. 49 U.S.C. 5302(a)(5).
Medicaid - Medicaid is a large funding resource for transportation across the country. In rural areas, NEMT
funding is often greater than public transit funds and virtually dwarfs other human service transportation programs
in terms of funding and priorities. Any coordination effort that does not include Medicaid risks omitting the largest
participant.
Mobility Management consists of short-range planning and management activities and projects for improving
coordination among public transportation and other transportation-service providers carried out by a recipient or
subrecipient through an agreement entered into with a person, including a government entity, under 49 U.S.C.
Chapter 53 (other than Section 5309). Mobility management does not include operating public transportation
services.
NEMT stands for Non-Emergency Medical Transportation, which is part of Title XIX of the Social Security Act
(Medicaid). The program itself is state run, with each state determining its approach to NEMT. (see brokerage)
New Freedom Program means the FTA formula grant program for new public transportation services and public
transportation alternatives beyond those required by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) (42
U.S.C.12101 et seq.) that assist individuals with disabilities with transportation, including transportation to and from
jobs and employment support services. 49 U.S.C. 5317.
Non-profit Organization means a corporation or association determined by the Secretary of the Treasury to be an
organization described by 26 U.S.C. 501(c) which is exempt from taxation under 26 U.S.C. 501(a) or one which
has been determined under State law to be non-profit and for which the designated State agency has received
documentation certifying the status of the non-profit organization.
Other than Urbanized (Non-urbanized) Area means any area outside of an urbanized area. The term “non-
urbanized area” includes rural areas and urban areas under 50,000 in population not included in an urbanized
area.
DRAFT
Paratransit means comparable transportation service required by the American Disabilities Act (ADA) for individuals
with disabilities who are unable to use fixed route transportation systems.
Pre-award Authority means authority given under specific and limited circumstances to incur costs for eligible
projects before a grant is made without prejudice to possible Federal participation in the cost of the project(s).
Applicants must comply with all Federal requirements. Failure to do so will render a project ineligible for FTA
financial assistance.
Program of Projects means a list of projects to be funded in a grant application submitted to FTA by a State. The
Program of Projects (POP) lists the sub-recipients and indicates whether they are private non-profit agencies or
local governmental authorities, designates the areas served (including rural areas), and identifies any tribal
entities.
Public Transit means Passenger transportation services, usually local in scope that is available to any person who
pays a prescribed fare. It operates on established schedules along designated route or lines with specific stops
and is designed to move relatively large numbers of people at one time.
Public Transit Agencies means a public entity responsible for administering and managing transit activities and
services. Public transit agencies can directly operate transit service or contract out for all or part of the total transit
service provided.
Public Transit System means an organization that provides transportation services owned, operated, or subsidized
by any municipality, county, regional authority, state, or other governmental agency, including those operated or
managed by a private management firm under contract to the government agency owner.
Public Transportation means transportation by bus, rail, or other conveyance, either publicly or privately owned,
which provides to the public general or special service on a regular and continuing basis. Also known as "mass
transportation", "mass transit" and "transit."
Purchased Transportation means transportation service purchased by a public agency from a public or private
provider on the basis of a written contract.
Recipient means a State agency designated by the chief executive officer of a State to receive funds apportioned
by formula to the States under Section 5310(b)(1), or a local government authority when Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA) funds are flexed to Section 5310 to support services for individuals with disabilities.
Sub-recipient means a private non-profit organization, if the public transportation service provided is unavailable,
insufficient, or inappropriate; or a governmental authority that is approved by the State to coordinate services for
elderly individuals and individuals with disabilities or certifies that there are not any non-profit organizations
readily available in the area to provide the services.
Transportation Clearinghouse means a central agency for the collection, classification, and distribution of
transportation information. It is an informal channel for distributing information such as fares, schedules, gas prices,
contact numbers… etc.
Urbanized Area means an area encompassing a population of not less than 50,000 people that has been defined
and designated in the most recent decennial census as an “urbanized area” by the Secretary of Commerce. Small
urbanized areas as used in the context of FTA formula grant programs are urbanized areas with a population of
at least 50,000 but less than 200,000.
DRAFT
Appendix 4: Affected Programs
ELDERLY INDIVIDUALS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES (FTA SECTION 5310) PROGRAM
The goal: Improve mobility of the elderly and disabled individuals in urbanized, small urban and rural areas. This
program provides funds to projects that meet the special transportation needs of these populations. Such projects
must be developed through coordinated transportation plans.
The target population: Elderly individuals include, at a minimum, all persons 65 years of age or older. The second
target population is Individuals with disabilities. According to 49 U.S.C. 5302(a)(5), this means an individual who,
because of illness, injury, age, congenital malfunction, or other incapacity or temporary or permanent disability
(including an individual who is a wheelchair user or has semi-ambulatory capability), cannot use effectively, without
special facilities, planning, or design, public transportation service or a public transportation facility.
The funds: Funds for the FTA Section 5310 program are available for capital expenses as defined in Section
5302(a)(1) to support the provision of transportation services to meet the special needs of elderly persons and
persons with disabilities. These funds are distributed using a formula based on the amount of elderly persons and
persons with disabilities in each state. For eligible capital projects, the Federal share of costs may not exceed 80%
of the net cost of the activity, with a local share of no less than 20%. Up to 10% of the apportionment may be
used to support program administrative costs, and these funds require no local match.
Eligible sub recipients are private non-profit organizations, Governmental authorities that certify to the chief
executive officer of a State that no non-profit corporations or associations are readily available in an area to
provide the service, and governmental authorities approved by the State to coordinate services for elderly
individuals and individuals with disabilities.
Eligible activities: including, but not limited to:
1. Purchase of:
a. buses
b. vans
c. radios and communication equipment
d. vehicle shelters
e. wheelchair lifts and restraints
f. vehicle rehabilitation; manufacture, or overhaul, or preventive maintenance, as defined in the
National Transit Database (NTD)
g. extended warranties which do not exceed the industry standard
h. computer hardware and software
i. initial component installation costs
j. vehicle procurement, testing, inspection, and acceptance costs
k. lease of equipment when lease is more cost effective than purchase. (State must establish criteria
for determining cost effectiveness in accordance with FTA regulations.)
2. Acquisition of transportation services under a contract, lease, or other arrangement. (Subject to eligibility
determined by MoDOT.)
3. The introduction of new technology, through innovative and improved products, into public transportation
4. Transit related intelligent transportation systems (ITS)
5. Supporting new mobility management and coordination programs among public transportation providers
and other human service agencies providing transportation. Mobility management activities may include:
a. The promotion, enhancement, and facilitation of access to transportation services
b. Support for short term management activities to plan and implement coordinated services
c. The support of State and local coordination policy bodies and councils
d. The operation of transportation brokerages to coordinate providers, funding agencies and
customers
e. The provision of coordination services
f. The development and operation of one-stop transportation traveler call centers
g. Operational planning for the acquisition of intelligent transportation technologies
DRAFT
Application Process: Applicants must submit their requests to the MPO. Based on selection criteria, the MPO will
review and select projects for approval and forward this review along with the application to MoDOT.
Selection Criteria: Pending Mileage (max 25 pts), Number of trips per month (max 25 pts), Types of trips (max 25
pts), Hours of service (0-10 pts).
SECTION 5310 OF CHAPTER 53, TITLE 49, U.S.C. FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION
Section 5310 funds provide capital assistance for non-profit organizations that provide service to the elderly or
persons with disabilities. Missouri receives an annual statewide allocation of federal assistance to purchase
vehicles, primarily vans. Capital assistance is funded at a maximum 80% federal and minimum 20%local share
match.
MoDOT sub-allocates this allocation to outstate and to urbanized areas of Columbia, City of Jefferson, Joplin,
Kansas City, Springfield, St. Joseph, St. Louis based on their respective elderly and disabled persons populations.
Each of the urbanized areas has established their own project evaluation criteria.
Non-urbanized funds are programmed directly by the department on the basis of trips provided by the recipient
organizations with extra weight given to medical, nutrition and other necessary trips. Replacement vehicles are
given a priority over expansion vehicles.
Financial capability to provide the local match and operate the vehicles must be demonstrated.
.
DRAFT
Appendix 5: MODOT Federal Funding Programs
Section 5303
The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) provides planning funds to urbanized areas via states through the Section 5303
program. MoDOT’s Transit Section allocates these urban transportation planning funds on a population basis to locally
designated metropolitan planning organizations.
Section 5310
FTA Section 5310 formula grants target agencies serving the mobility needs of senior citizens and/or persons with
disabilities. MoDOT administers the Section 5310 program as a capital program to procure and fund 80% of the cost of
vehicles for such agencies as developmental disability resource boards (Senate Bill 40 boards), sheltered workshops, senior
citizen services boards (House Bill 351 boards), senior centers, and not-for-profit medical service agencies.
Section 5311
The Federal Transit Administration provides grants to states on a formula basis for nonurban transit in the Section 5311
program. Rural transit providers and intercity bus carriers apply to MoDOT’s Transit Section for these grants to carry out
rural public transit related service, planning and capital projects.
Section 5339
MoDOT’s Transit Section also administers grants to replace, rehabilitate and purchase buses and related equipment and to
construct bus-related facilities. The federal transit capital grants in FTA’s Section 5339 grant program fund 80% of the
cost of these activities.
Rural Transit Assistance Program (RTAP)
The Transit Section also administers the rural transportation assistance program by providing training and technical
assistance functions funded by FTA. Free on-site training courses for rural transit agencies include defensive driving, CPR,
first aid, passenger assistance techniques and emergency procedures.
State Funding
Rural and urban public transit agencies benefit from state funded operating assistance. This general revenue fund and/or
state transportation fund program helps to defray a portion of the costs those agencies incur in providing mobility services
in their communities.
The Missouri Elderly and Handicapped Transportation Assistance Program (MEHTAP) is a state- funded program that helps
defray a portion of the transportation costs incurred by agencies providing mobility services to senior citizens and persons
with disabilities. Half of the annual general revenue funding in this program is allocated to the 10 Area Agencies on
Aging districts statewide.
DRAFT
Agenda Item 7A
CAMPO Board of Directors Staff Report
Status of Current Work Tasks
May 19, 2021
Summary
The following list includes work tasks that are currently in progress or have been completed since the
previous meeting:
• FY 2022 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) development. Update completed. See
attached Staff Report and draft document.
• 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) development. Update completed.
See attached Staff Report and draft document.
• Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan. Update completed. See
attached Staff Report and draft document.
• Jefferson City Data Assistance. Staff is working with other Jefferson City planners in providing
data and mapping assistance in the update of the of the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The plan is
anticipated to be adopted in June.
• Major Thoroughfare Plan Development. Staff continues work on the Major Thoroughfare
Plan in conjunction with the development of the Jefferson City Comprehensive Plan. The Major
Thoroughfare Plan will be developed through stakeholder input and will pull directly from the
2018 Travel Demand Model.
• JEFFTRAN Transit Facility Feasibility Study RFQ. An RFQ was advertised in March with
one submission received. Jefferson City Public Works staff is currently in discussion with the
consultant.
• Jefferson City Park and Recreation Mapping Assistance. Staff is providing assistance in
reviewing the greenway network and other GIS data and making adjustments to park maps.