The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My Public Portal About2021-06-03 packet Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. Please call (573) 634-6410 with questions regarding agenda items. Technical Committee Thursday, June 3, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. Meeting Location: Council Chambers, John G. Christy Municipal Building 320 E. McCarty, Jefferson City, MO 65101 - Enter through Main Lobby VIRTUAL OPTION TO JOIN VIRTUALLY: CLICK HERE CALL-IN AVAILABLE AT: 1-404-397-1516 MEETING NUMBER: 187 439 9370 MEETING PASSWORD: 1234 All interested parties will be given a chance to be heard. TENTATIVE AGENDA 1. Call to order, roll call, and determination of a quorum 2. Public comment 3. Adoption of the agenda as printed or amended 4. Approval of the minutes from the meeting of April 1, 2021 5. Communications Received 6. New Business A. Major Thoroughfare Plan - DRAFT Action Requested: Review, discussion, and forward to Board of Directors for approval. Staff Report: The Draft Major Thoroughfare Plan is a result of the 2019 updated the Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) and the 2020-2021 update of the Jefferson City Comprehensive Plan. An updated Travel Demand Model (TDM) was completed in 2019 and the recommendations from the TDM, MTP, and additional stakeholder input was used to produce the CAMPO Thoroughfare Plan. The CAMPO Major Thoroughfare Plan will be an appendix in the MTP. The process will result in an administrative modification to the MTP. B. Multi-Modal Illustrative List Review Action Requested: Review, discussion, and forward to Board of Directors for approval. Staff Report: The Metropolitan Transportation Plan includes an Illustrative List of project priorities, which includes Highway/Bridge projects and Multi-modal/Pedestrian projects. Staff are requesting a review of the Multimodal/Pedestrian project portion of the Illustrative list in anticipation of upcoming MoDOT unfunded needs discussions. 7. Other Business A. Appointment of Sub-Committee for update of Capital Area Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan B. Status of Current Work Tasks C. Member Updates 8. Next Meeting Date – Thursday, July 1, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. in the Council Chambers, City of Jefferson City Hall 9. Adjournment Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Room 120 320 E. McCarty, Jefferson City, MO 65101 Phone 573.634.6410 Fax 573.634.6457 MINUTES TECHNICAL COMMITTEE CAPITAL AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION April 1, 2021 VOTING MEMBERS PRESENT Cole County: Shannon Kliethermes Eric Landwehr Matt Prenger Jefferson City: David Bange, Vice Chairman Eric Barron Mark Mehmert Britt Smith MoDOT: Mike Henderson Steve Engelbrecht Bob Lynch Holt Summit: Hannah Thomas VOTING MEMBERS ABSENT Cary Maloney, Pedestrian or Biking Interest Paul Winkelmann, Callaway County Paul Stonner, Wardsville JJ Gates, City of Jefferson Matt Morasch, City of Jefferson Sonny Sanders, Chairman, City of Jefferson Joe Scheppers, Private Transportation Interest EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS ABSENT Brad McMahon, Federal Highway Administration Eva Steinman, Federal Transit Administration STAFF PRESENT (Non-Voting) Katrina Williams, Transportation Planner Lee Bowden, Transportation Planner Beth Sweeten, Administrative Assistant GUESTS PRESENT Jennifer Bowden Kim Tipton Michael Shine, News Tribune 1. Call to order, roll call, and determination of a quorum Mr. Bange called the meeting to order at 10:00 a.m. and asked Ms. Sweeten to call roll. A quorum of 10 voting members or their designee was present. 2. Public comment None 3. Adoption of the agenda as printed or amended Mr. Barron moved to add TIP Amendment to the agenda, as the first item on the agenda. Mr. Mehmert seconded to adopt the agenda as amended. The motion passed unanimously. 4. Approval of the minutes from the meeting of March 4, 2021 Mr. Mehmert moved and Mr. Prenger seconded to approve the minutes from the meeting of March 4, 2021 as written. The motion passed unanimously. 5. Communications Received No Communication was received Minutes/Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Technical Committee April 4, 2021 Page 2 6. New Business A. 2021-2025 Transportation Improvement Program Proposed Amendment #2 Mr. Bowden explained that the amendment was added to the agenda this morning. Staff is seeking a recommendation from the Technical Committee to the Board of Directors to approve an amendment to the 2021-2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). The amendment includes a change to MoDOT project 5P3405 (2018-06), Guard Cable & Guardrail Repair in Northern Central District. The project total $2,142,000 and is funded at 80% through the FHWA STBG funds and 20% through MoDOT TCOS funds. The project will be completed in program year 2021. Staff recommends approval of this amendment. Mr. Smith moved and Mr. Prenger seconded to open a 7-day public comment period and forward the proposed amendment to the Board of Directors for approval. The motion passed unanimously. B. 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) – DRAFT Mr. Bowden explained that the development of the draft 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is nearing finalization. He stated a public comment period will be opened by April 21, 2021 and will be closed on May 19, after which the TIP can be approved. Staff recommends approving and forwarding the Draft FY2022 Unified Planning Work Program to the Board of Directors for review and approval. Mr. Smith moved and Mr. Prenger seconded to forward the Draft 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program to the Board of Directors for approval. The motion passed unanimously. C. FY 2022 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) – DRAFT Ms. Williams explained that the estimated draft budget for the FY2022 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) is approximately $190,449. She requests the Technical Committee review the objectives and activities listed in the draft. Staff recommends approving and forwarding the Draft FY2022 Unified Planning Work Program to the Board of Directors for review and approval. Mr. Smith moved and Mr. Prenger seconded to forward the Draft FY2022 Unified Planning Work Program to the Board of Directors for approval. The motion passed unanimously. D. 2021 Coordinated Public Transit – Human Services Transportation Plan (Coordinated Plan)- DRAFT Ms. Williams explained that the Coordinated Plan is a locally developed transportation plan that provides an overview of current conditions, capacities, and goals as they pertain to public transportation in the CAMPO region. The Coordinated Plan is a required document for MPO’s and RPC’s to apply for Section 5310 funds. She stated a public survey closed in January with 50 responses. A stakeholder survey closed in February with 17 responses. A stakeholder meeting was held February 18th and a final public meeting will be held April 6th. A 25-day public comment period will be opened by April 21st and closed by the Board of Directors at a meeting on May 19th. Mr. Smith moved and Mr. Prenger seconded to forward the Draft 2021 Coordinated Public Transit- Human Services Transportation Plan to the Board of Directors for review and approval. The motion passed unanimously. 7. Other Business A. Status of current work tasks Ms. Williams provided a brief overview of the following items: • FY 2022 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) development. Staff is nearing finalization on the process of updating the UPWP. • 2022-2026 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) development. Staff is nearing finalization on the process of updating the TIP. • Jefferson City Data Assistance. Staff is working with other Jefferson City planners in providing data and mapping assistance in the update of the of the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The plan is anticipated to be adopted in June. Minutes/Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Technical Committee April 4, 2021 Page 3 • Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan. Staff is nearing finalization on the process of updating the plan. • Major Thoroughfare Plan Development. Staff continues work on the Major Thoroughfare Plan in conjunction with the development of the Jefferson City Comprehensive Plan. The Major Thoroughfare Plan will be developed through stakeholder input and will pull directly from the 2018 Travel Demand Model. • Local Street Classification Update. Staff has completed an update of local street classifications throughout City of Jefferson and Cole County as part of the Thoroughfare Plan development for the City of Jefferson. • JEFFTRAN Transit Facility Feasibility Study RFQ. An RFQ was advertised in March with one submission received. B. Member Updates Jefferson City --Mr. Bange gave an update on the East High project, Bicentennial Bridge, and the MSP project. --Mr. Mehmert gave an update on replacing software for paratransit. --Mr. Smith gave an update on the new airport terminal, airport lights, new parking garage and annual overlay projects. --Mr. Gates was not present --Mr. Barron gave an update on unfunded road projects meeting, he recently attended. Cole County --Mr. Landwehr introduced Matt Prenger as the new County engineer. He gave an update on HWY 50 and the annual overlay and chip seal project. --Mr. Kliethermes had nothing to add. Holt Summit --Ms. Thomas had nothing to add. MoDOT --Mr. Lynch gave an updated on the HWY 50 resurfacing and the unfunded needs list. --Mr. Henderson had nothing to add. --Mr. Engelbrecht gave an update on the annual State Improvement Transportation Program. 8. Next Meeting Date - Thursday, May 6, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. in the Boone/Bancroft Room #200, also via WebEx.. 9. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 11:00 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Beth Sweeten, Administrative Assistant Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. CAMPO Technical Committee Staff Report CAMPO Major Thoroughfare Plan June 3, 2021 Summary CAMPO staff has developed a draft Major Thoroughfare Plan. The Major Thoroughfare Plan is a result of the 2019 updated the Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) and the 2020-2021 update of the Jefferson City Comprehensive Plan. An updated Travel Demand Model (TDM) was completed in 2019 and the recommendations from the TDM, MTP, and additional stakeholder input was used to produce the CAMPO Thoroughfare Plan. The CAMPO Major Thoroughfare Plan stands as Appendix J in the MTP. The approval process will result in an Administrative Modification of the MTP. The Major Thoroughfare Plan details improvements to existing roads and future major roads that are necessary to accommodate the anticipated 20-year growth projections of the CAMPO Planning Area. Specifically, expansion projects of existing roads that may or may not result in an upgrade of the road’s federal functional classification. The goals of the Major Thoroughfare Plan are as follows: • Provide for the efficient movement of vehicular traffic into and throughout the Region. • Consider right-of-way needs to accommodate a proposed thoroughfare. • Ensure adequate roadways to serve existing and proposed developments. • Assist in identifying Capital Improvement Program needs. • Reduce the traffic volumes in residential areas by ensuring adequate arterials. • Serve as a planning tool and assist coordination with other agencies. Generally, the Major Thoroughfare Plan excludes minor collector and local street projects. The draft document is attached to this staff report and is available at: www.jeffersoncitymo.gov/campo. Please refer questions or comments to Katrina Williams at 573-634-6536 or by email at kawilliams@jeffcitymo.org. Public Comment If the Technical Committee approves forwarding the Draft Major Thoroughfare Plan to the Board of Directors, staff will open a 7-day public comment period. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approving and forwarding the Draft Major Thoroughfare Plan to the Board of Directors for review and approval. Recommended Form of Motion: Motion to forward the Draft Major Thoroughfare Plan to the Board of Directors for review. Agenda Item 6A Major Thoroughfare Plan Appendix J CAMPO 2045 & Beyond Metropolitan Transportation Plan Adopted August 10, 2021 The preparation of this report was financed in part by the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, and Federal Transit Administration in cooperation with the Missouri Department of Transportation. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this report are not necessarily those of the Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Administration, or the Missouri Department of Transportation. DRAFT Note: Updates to the Metropolitan Transportation Plan and Major Thoroughfare Plan can be found on our website at www.jeffersoncitymo.gov/campo Produced by the Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Consultant services for the development of the Travel Demand Model provided by HDR, Inc. and City Explained, Inc. MPO Administration is provided by the City of Jefferson Department of Planning and Protective Services/ Planning Division Room 120 John G. Christy Municipal Building 320 East McCarty Jefferson City, Missouri Telephone 573-634-6410 http://www.jeffersoncitymo.gov/campo/ DRAFT Resolution DRAFT WHAT IS THE MAJOR THOROUGHFARE PLAN? The CAMPO Major Thoroughfare Plan was developed after the 2019 completion of the CAMPO 2045 & Beyond Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP). An updated Travel Demand Model (TDM) was completed in 2019 and the recommendations from the TDM, MTP, and additional stakeholder input was used to produce the CAMPO Thoroughfare Plan. The CAMPO Major Thoroughfare Plan is a component of the CAMPO 2045 & Beyond MTP. What is the Major Thoroughfare Plan? The Major Thoroughfare Plan details improvements to existing roads and future major roads that are necessary to accommodate the anticipated 20-year growth projections of the CAMPO Planning Area. The goals of the Major Thoroughfare Plan are as follows: • Provide for the efficient movement of vehicular traffic into and throughout the Region. • Consider right-of-way needs to accommodate a proposed thoroughfare. • Ensure adequate roadways to serve existing and proposed developments. • Assist in identifying Capital Improvement Program needs. • Reduce the traffic volumes in residential areas by ensuring adequate arterials. • Serve as a planning tool and assist coordination with other agencies. Generally, the Major Thoroughfare Plan excludes minor collector and local street projects. The Major Thoroughfare plan includes system performance projects (Tier 1 and 2) as identified in the CAMPO 2045 & Beyond MTP Illustrative List of Projects. The Major Thoroughfare Plan is composed of two elements: 1) Federal Functional Class Map - a map showing the current Federal Functional Classification for all CAMPO roads. (Figure 2) 2) Major Thoroughfare Plan Map - a map and list showing upgrades to existing roads and locations of future road connections. (Figure 3) The CAMPO Major Thoroughfare Plan does not include detailed traffic studies, crash data, or other condition statistics as those are available in the CAMPO TDM, CAMPO MTP, or in studies conducted by individual jurisdictions. CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND MTP AND 2019 TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL In 2019 CAMPO adopted an updated Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP). The 2045 & Beyond MTP was a complete rewrite from previous iterations and included an updated Travel Demand Model (TDM). The MTP and TDM utilized the planning documents mentioned above along with multi-modal plans such as Holts Summit’s 2014 Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Transit Plan, the 2017 CAMPO Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan, and the 2017 Coordinate Public Transit - Human Services Transportation Plan. The TDM resulted in a list of recommended improvements that were based on stakeholder needs, current land use, future land use projections, and population and housing projections. The TDM was used to support the MTP’s Implementation Plan and Illustrative List of Projects. The Illustrative List of Projects outlined in the MTP directly supports the development of the CAMPO Major Thoroughfare Plan. CAMPO Major Thoroughfare Plan 1 DRAFT FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION Functional classification, governed by federal guidelines, is the process by which roads, streets and highways are grouped into classes according to the character of service they are intended to provide. It defines the role that any particular road or street should play in serving the flow of trips through a highway network. Functional classification progresses from a lower classification handling short, local trips to a higher classification as the trips become longer and connect regional and inter-regional traffic generators. Functional classification changes are submitted to FHWA every year for review and approval. Functional classifications are periodically reviewed by MoDOT and local representatives, but are usually updated every ten years, coinciding with U.S. Census revisions of urban boundaries. The CAMPO functional classification system was last reviewed and revised in early 2013. Functional classification is used in transportation planning, roadway design and determining the funding eligibility of transportation projects. Private roads are not included in the CAMPO functional classification network nor are interstate highways, tribal lands roadways, or federal lands roadways. Functionally classed roadways in the CAMPO network include US highways, state highways, county roads, and some municipal roads/streets. These roadways are divided into urban and rural, and are further classified as local, collector, or arterial as seen in Figure 1. Figure 1 Federal System for Functional Classifications Source: FHWA Functional Classification Guidelines FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAY PROGRAM The Federal-Aid Highway Program supports State highway systems by providing financial assistance for the construction, maintenance, and operations of the Nation's 3.9 million-mile highway network, including Interstates, primary highways and secondary local roads. FHWA is charged with implementing the Federal-Aid Highway Program in cooperation with the States and local governments. Nationally, local governments own and operate about 75 percent of the Nation's highway network. The Program applies to all “functionally classed” roads, with the exception of Minor Collectors or Local. CAMPO Major Thoroughfare Plan 2 DRAFT £¡50 £¡54 £¡63 £¡63 £¡50 ¹ ¬¬179 ¬¬94 ""C Missouri River Taos O s a g e R i v e r C o l e C o u n t yCallawayCounty Wardsville £¡63 £¡54 ""J ""M ""B ""B ""E ""W ""T ""D ""D ""OO ""AA ""BB Jefferson CitySt. Martins HoltsSummit City Limits MPO Boundary Federal Functional Classification 0 3 61.5 Miles Freeway/Expressway Prinicipal Arterial Minor Arterial Major Collector Minor Collector Local C a l l a w a y C o u n t y B o o n e C o u n t y CAMPO Federal Functional Classification System Figure 2 CAMPO Major Thoroughfare Plan 3 DRAFT £¡50 £¡54 £¡63 £¡63 £¡50 ¹ ¬¬179 MissouriRiver Taos Cole County Callaway County Wardsville £¡54 ""M ""B ""W ""T Jefferson CitySt. Martins 0 2.5 51.25 Miles !10 !3 !4 !5 !8 !14 !1 !15 !12 !13 !11 !2 !6 !7 Schotthill Woods Drive Extension to Schott Road Bald Hill Rd. (Eastland Dr. to Rolling Hills Rd.)Safety improvements: shoulder widening, horizontal and vertical alignment improvements, right-of-way clearing for better sight distance, and improved signing. FFFC: Minor CollectorTanner Bridge Rd. (Route B to Friendship Ln.) Rainbow Dr. (Paradigm Dr. to Binder Lake Rd.)Henwick Ln. (Rainbow Dr. to Gary Ln.)Scott Station Rd. (city limits to Willowbrook Dr.) Construction of a curb and gutter, stormwater improvements, and new pavement.FFFC: Major Collector US 50/63 Rex Whitton Expressway US 50/54/63 Tri-Level US 63/54 north of the Missouri River Bridge Mission Drive extension to Rock Ridge Road Wildwood Drive extension to Route C Wildwood Drive extension to Rock Ridge Road Militia Drive extension to Liberty Road S. Summit Drive ramp additions Stoneridge Parkway extension to W. Edgewood Drive Upgrades to Existing Roads Future Roads Project Description Reconfiguration of interchange to provide non-conflicting system-to-system movements. FFFC - Future Federal Functional Classification are based on a 20 year planning horizon. Improvements to capacity and traffic controls between US 54 and Lafayette Street. Creation of a third eastbound and westbound lane, between the Missouri River Bridge and the ramps at the divergence of US 63/54. The project would likely include a re-configuration of the Route W and US 63/54 overpass. FFFC: Freeway/Expressway !9 !16 Improve capacity, reconfigure intersections, widening. FFFC: Minor ArterialRoute B (Tanner Bridge Rd to Route W) Project identified in the 2019 Travel Demand Model. It is unknown how this connection will develop and the project would likely occur in phases. FFFC: CollectorContinued southern extension of Wildwood Drive from Rock Ridge Road to Route C. FFFC: Collector Southern extension of Wildwood Drive from W. Edgewood Drive to Rock Ridge Road. FFFC: Collector Southern extension of Militia Drive from US 63 to Liberty Road. FFFC: Collector Construction of east bound and north bound ramps connecting US 54 to S. Summit Drive in Callaway County. The ramps would complete the existing overpass. FFFC: Freeway/Expressway Southern extension from the roundabout to W. Edgewood Dr. The extension would include four lanes with intermittent landscaped medians and center turn lanes, similar to the existing northern portion.FFFC: CollectorEastern extension of Schotthill Woods Drive from its current terminous to Schott Road. FFFC: Collector CAMPO Major Thoroughfare Plan !1!2 !3 !4 !5 !6 !7 !8 !9 !10 !14 !15 !12 !13 !11 !16 Area Enlarged Figure 3 CAMPO Major Thoroughfare Plan 4 DRAFT Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. CAMPO Technical Committee Staff Report Illustrative Projects List Review Multi-Modal and Pedestrian/Non-Motorized Projects June 3, 2021 Summary Staff are bringing the Multi-Modal and Pedestrian/Non-Motorized Illustrative List Projects forward for review by the Technical Committee and Board. Staff try to bring the list up for review on a regular basis (preferably annually). Also, MoDOT is anticipated to begin a multimodal unfunded needs discussion with their planning partners in late 2021 and staff would like to ensure that the CAMPO project list is up to date. Projects contained in the Illustrative List are separated into different “Tiers” based on the impact or underlying need of the project, as follows: (Projects are not prioritized within each Tier) Tier 1 – Regionally Significant projects that are supported by the travel demand model and recognized as a high priority by the Board of Directors, stakeholders, and the general public. Tier 2 – Projects with a more localized area of impact that are (mostly) supported by the travel demand model and recognized as a high priority by the Board of Directors, stakeholders, and the general public Tier 3 – Projects recognized as a need by stakeholders and the general public and may or may not be supported by the travel demand model. Projects are also classified type as follows: System Performance – Typically vehicle oriented Highway/Roadway and intersection projects. Multi-Modal – Transit, Airport, Rail, and River projects. Pedestrian and Non-Motorized – Sidewalk, crosswalk, bicycle, and greenway projects. The following are attached for review by the Techincal Committee: 1. Excerpt of Illustrative Multimodal/Pedestrian Projects from the 2045 MTP. 2. Report focused on Multi-Modal and Pedestrian/Non-Motorized Projects. Staff Recommendation Staff is bringing this project list forward to the Technical Committee for any additions or deletions to the existing Multi-Modal and Pedestrian/Non-Motorized sections of the Illustrative List. Staff request a forwarding of the list, with any additions or deletions, to the Board of Directors for final review. Recommended Form of Motion: Motion to forward the Illustrative list to the Board of Directors for review. Agenda Item 6B CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN 97 ILLUSTRATIVE SITE SPECIFIC PROJECTS This site specific list of illustrative projects Note: The reference numbers used in the following tables and maps do not denote priority. This number is just a reference number. •Regionally Significant: Impacting network users from outside the region and having major impacts on freight movement moving through the region •Recognized as a high priority by Board of Directors, stakeholders, and public •Supported by the 2045 Travel Demand Model •Supports increased motorized and non-motorized safety and system performance •Intersections and interchanges with high numbers of crashes TIER 1 •Recognized as a high priority by Board of Directors, stakeholders, and public •Most projects in this Tier are supported by the Travel Demand Model •Supports increased motorized and non-motorized safety and system performance •Intersections and interchanges with high numbers of crashes TIER 2 •Designated as a need by stakeholders and general public •Some projects in this tier are supported by the Travel Demand Model •Projects in this tier may be completed in phases, dramatically changing cost and date of completion •Supports increased motorized and non-motorized safety and system performance •Intersections and interchanges with high numbers of crashes TIER 3 CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN 98 Figure 6.7A Illustrative Projects – System Performance Source: CAMPO Figure 6.7B Illustrative Projects – System Performance – Tier 1 System Performance - Tier 1 # Jurisdiction Location Project Description Term Cost Range 1 Jefferson City US 54 / 63 / 94 (Bluff Rd) Construct direct connector for northbound-to-westbound movement to improve capacity; widen US 54/63 to provide 3 continuous through lanes in each direction (in addition to auxiliary/acceleration/deceleration lanes) Long-Term 10 years< $10M< 2 Jefferson City US 50/63, US 54 to Lafayette St Implement major capacity improvements, which could include mainline widening, grade separations, and/or outer roads Long-Term 10 years< $10M< 3 Jefferson City US 50 / 63 /54 (Tri-Level) Reconfigure interchange to provide non- conflicting system-to-system movements Long-Term 10 years< $5M-$10M CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN 99 Figure 6.7C Illustrative Projects – System Performance – Tier 2 System Performance - Tier 2 # Jurisdiction Location Project Description Term Cost Range 4 Callaway County US 54 / S. Summit Dr. Ramps Addition of ramps to westbound and eastbound US 54 completing the S. Summit Dr. overpass Long-Term 10 years< $1M-$5M 5 Jefferson City US 50 / Dix Rd Reconfigure interchange and Dix Rd approaches to address capacity issues including lack of left-turn lanes; consider dumbbell roundabout interchange; widen Dix Rd to provide center turn lane and pedestrian access from US 50 to Missouri Blvd Near-Term 5-10 years $5M-$10M 6 Jefferson City West Edgewood @ Stadium Install roundabout to improve intersection capacity Near-Term 5-10 years $500k-$5M 7 Jefferson City Missouri Blvd, Eastern Lowe's entrance to S 10 Mile Dr Address access management along the corridor, including turn restrictions, additional traffic control, and safety. Near-Term 5-10 years $1M-$10M 8 Jefferson City W. Truman Blvd @ Scott Station Rd Signalize or otherwise enhance capacity Near-Term 5-10 years < $500k 9 Jefferson City US-54 NB Ramps / Christy Dr / Stadium / Jefferson St Install roundabouts at both hook ramp intersections to improve operations and address offsets/angles Near-Term 5-10 years $1M-$10M 12 Wardsville Route B, Ashbury Way to Route M Install roundabout at Rte B / Falcon / Ashbury and intersection improvements to Rte B / Rte M/ Rte W. Near-Term 5-10 years $1M-$5M 13 Jefferson City US 54 / Ellis Blvd / Southwest Blvd Reconfigure interchange to address capacity and close spacing of outer roads. Create pedestrian connection on Southwest/Ellis Blvd from Ford St to Southridge Dr Near-Term 5-10 years $5M-$10M 14 Jefferson City Southwest Blvd @ Stadium Install roundabout to improve intersection capacity Near-Term 5-10 years $500k-$5M 15 Jefferson City Ellis Bl / Green Berry Rd Install roundabout to improve intersection capacity Near-Term 5-10 years $500k-$5M 16 Jefferson City Bald Hill Rd / Seven Hills Rd Install roundabout to improve intersection capacity Near-Term 5-10 years $500k-$5M 17 Jefferson City US 50 / Truman Bl / Country Club Dr Reconfigure interchange to address close outer road spacing; widen westbound off-ramp to improve capacity; incorporate pedestrian facilities into the interchange Near-Term 5-10 years $5M-$10M 21 Jefferson City West Edgewood @ Creek Trail Install roundabout to improve intersection capacity Near-Term 5-10 years $500k-$5M 22 Jefferson City Missouri Blvd, Country Club Dr to Howerton Widen to 5 lanes; including right turn lane at Howerton Ct. Long-Term 10 years< $5M-$10M 23 Jefferson City Country Club Dr, Truman Blvd to Rainbow Dr Widen to provide left-turn lanes at existing and future access points Long-Term 10 years< $1M-$5M 25 Holts Summit US 54 / Route OO / Simon Blvd Reconfigure interchange to address close outer road spacing and capacity issues (may involve roundabouts); incorporate pedestrian facilities crossing US 54 Long-Term 10 years< $5M-$10M 26 Jefferson City Missouri Blvd, Stoneridge Pkwy to US 50 Improve access management along Missouri Blvd, including improvements to intersections, restrictions to turning movements, and improvements to pedestrian safety. Long-Term 10 years< $5M-$10M CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN 100 Figure 6.7D Illustrative Projects – System Performance – Tier 3 System Performance - Tier 3 # Jurisdiction Location Project Description Term Cost Range 29 Jefferson City Madison Street, Dunklin St to US-54 Ramps Add a center turn lane via a combination of widening and parking removal; address unusual stop control configuration at Madison Atchison Near-Term 5-10 years $1M-$5M 30 Jefferson City US 50/63 / Clark Ave Reconfigure interchange to address ramp terminal capacity (likely roundabouts); include modifications to Clark/Miller and Clark/Dunklin intersections to improve corridor operations Near-Term 5-10 years $1M-$10M 31 Holts Summit US 54 / Center St Improve interchange capacity and east-side outer road spacing with roundabouts at terminals Long-Term 10 years< $1M-$10M 32 Cole County Rock Ridge Rd / Wildwood Dr extension Add left-turn lane on Rock Ridge to improve capacity after completion of extension Long-Term 10 years< $1M-$5M 33 Jefferson City MO 179, Industrial Dr to Sue Dr Add left-turn lanes at Sue Dr, Cherry Creek Ct, and Fire Station north driveway Long-Term 10 years< $500k-$5M 34 Jefferson City MO 179 and Truman Blvd Reconfigure intersection with roundabout Long-Term 10 years< $1M-$5M 35 Cole County Bridge Replacement / Tanner Bridge Rd Bridge Replacement on Tanner Bridge Rd. over Moreau River Near-Term 5-10 years $1M-$5M 36 Wardsville Route B, Tanner Bridge Rd to Friendship Rd Install roundabouts at two locations to improve capacity: Rte B / Falcon / Ashbury, Rte B / Rte M; widen to four lanes in each direction on Rte B for several hundred feet south of Tanner Bridge Rd and reconfigure intersection; Widen Rte B to provide TWLT Near-Term 5-10 years $5M-$10M 39 Jefferson City Swifts Hwy / Jefferson St Reconfigure to fix sight distance issues; widen Swifts Hwy approach Long-Term 10 years< $50K-$100k 40 Holts Summit S. Summit Dr / Perrey Dr / Hibernia Ln / Holt Ln Redesign intersection to address offset and sight distance Near-Term 5-10 years N/A 41 Holts Summit Spalding Rd/ Park Install drainage improvements. Curb and gutter could cause surface flooding for adjoining properties. Near-Term 5-10 years N/A 42 Holts Summit N. Summit Dr and Mars St Intersection Install drainage improvements -box culvert. Near-Term 5-10 years N/A 43 Holts Summit Van Horn Rd / Julie Ln Redesign intersection to address offset and sight distance Near-Term 5-10 years N/A 47 St. Martins Route T/D & Bus 50 W Intersection Reconfigure intersection with roundabout Near-Term 5-10 years $500k-$1M 48 Holts Summit Nieman Rd / Halifax Rd / Major Terr Address offset and skew by installing roundabout or realigning east leg Near-Term 5-10 years N/A 49 Holts Summit E Simon Blvd Replace undersized culvert. Install new bridge ~0.4 mi east of Jefferson Rd Near-Term 5-10 years N/A 57 Taos Routes M and Y shoulders Install minimum 2 ft. shoulders along state routes M and Y in Taos Near-Term 5-10 years $500k-$1M 60 Jefferson City High St. viaduct rehabilitation Rehabilitation of the High St. viaduct over Missouri Blvd. Long-Term 10 years< $5M-$10M CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN 101 Figure 6.8A Illustrative Projects – Multi-Modal Source: CAMPO CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN 102 Figure 6.8B Illustrative Projects – Multi-Modal – Tier 2 Multi-Modal - Tier 2 # Jurisdiction Location Project Description Term Cost Range 18 Jefferson City JEFFTRAN Transit Facilities Construction of a new facilities for JEFFTRAN that would provide better accommodations for transit riders and staff, including, but not limited to; a bus barn, washing bays, central maintenance facilities, and administrative offices Near-Term 5-10 years $5M-$10M 19 Jefferson City Jefferson City Amtrak Station Renovation or replacement of the Amtrak Train Station in Jefferson City Long-Term 10 years< <$100M 20 Jefferson City/ Cole County/ Callaway County Missouri River Port Construction of a port facility in either Callaway County or Cole County as specified in the Central Missouri Multimodal Port Feasibility Study. Near-Term 5-10 years $10M< 27 Jefferson City Jefferson City Memorial Airport Reconstruction of Runway 9/27 Near-Term 5-10 years $1M-$5M 28 Jefferson City Jefferson City Memorial Airport Construction of new air traffic control tower. Near-Term 5-10 years $1M-$5M Figure 6.8C Illustrative Projects – Multi-Modal – Tier 3 Multi-Modal - Tier 3 # Jurisdiction Location Project Description Term Cost Range 37 Jefferson City Jefferson City Memorial Airport - Runway 9 and 9/27 Relocate Runway 9 and Extend Runway 9/27 at the Jefferson City Memorial Airport. Long- Term 10 years< $5M-$10M 38 Jefferson City Jefferson City Memorial Airport - Runway 12/30 Extension and Widening of runway 12/30 at the Jefferson City Memorial Airport. Long- Term 10 years< $10M< CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN 103 Figure 6.9A Illustrative Projects – Pedestrian and Non-Motorized Source: CAMPO CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN 104 Figure 6.9B Illustrative Projects – Pedestrian & Non-Motorized – Tier 2 Pedestrian & Non-Motorized - Tier 2 # Jurisdiction Location Project Description Term Cost Range 10 Holts Summit S. Summit Drive, Simon to Center Install sidewalks with some curb and gutter and drop inlets Long- Term 10 years< $500K-$1M 11 Jefferson City Missouri Blvd, W. Main St. to Stadium Blvd. Complete connectivity between segments of sidewalk and install crosswalks/pedestrian refuges as needed. Near- Term 5- 10 years $1M-$5M Figure 6.9C Illustrative Projects – Pedestrian & Non-Motorized – Tier 3 Pedestrian & Non-Motorized - Tier 3 # Jurisdiction Location Project Description Term Cost Range 24 Jefferson City Bolivar St. Greenway Design and construct a greenway extension from the Dunklin St. Trailhead to McCarty St. Near-Term 5-10 years $500k-$1M 44 Jefferson City Southwest Blvd & Dix Rd Intersection Install pedestrian-activated beacon or similar warning device Near-Term 5-10 years < $50K 45 Jefferson City Dix Road, W. Main to Missouri Blvd Improve bicycle and pedestrian facilities along the corridor Near-Term 5-10 years < $500k 46 St. Martins/ Cole County Route T, Bus 50 to Elston Install shoulders to accommodate cyclists and pedestrians. Near-Term 5-10 years $5M-$10M 50 Holts Summit Karen Dr, Center to Thompson Install sidewalk and crosswalks Near-Term 5-10 years $500K-$1M 51 Holts Summit Halifax Rd, Center to Nieman Install sidewalk and crosswalks Near-Term 5-10 years $500K-$1M 52 St. Martins/ Cole County Route T, Henwick Ln to Bus 50 W Install curb, gutter & sidewalk in each direction Near-Term 5-10 years N/A 53 CAMPO Bike lane installation in CAMPO Region Continue expansion of bike lanes in the downtown area. Near-Term 5-10 years $50K-$100k 54 CAMPO CAMPO Greenway Connectivity Continue to expand greenways to connect cities in the CAMPO Region Long-Term 10 years< $10M< 55 Jefferson City Jefferson City Greenway Projects Locations may include; Fairgrounds Acres to County Park, South Country Club Drive to Turtle Creek subdivision, Ellis-Porter Riverside Park connector from St. Louis Road, Wears Creek to East Branch Connector, Frog Hollow Phase 4, Creek Trail to W. Edgewood Near-Term 5-10 years $50k-$1M 56 Jefferson City Missouri Blvd and S. Ten Mile, Stoneridge Pkwy to S. Country Club Install Sidewalks and crosswalks along route with pedestrian accesss over MO 179 provided via a pedestrian bridge connecting S. Ten Mile east and west segments. Near-Term 5-10 years $1M-$5M 58 Taos Sidewalk expansion Extend sidewalk along Route M north and south of existing sidewalk. Near-Term 5-10 years $1M-$5M 59 Taos Trail Connectivity Create sidewalk/trail connection between Route M sidewalk and Countryside Park trail. Near-Term 5-10 years < $500k Multi-Modal / Pedestrian / Non-Motorized Illustrative Projects List Review 2021 2 | Page Contents Illustrative Projects List ................................................................................................................................ 3 Multi-Modal.................................................................................................................................................. 5 JEFFTRAN Transit Facilities ....................................................................................................................... 6 Jefferson City Amtrak Station .................................................................................................................. 7 Missouri River Port ................................................................................................................................... 8 Jefferson City Memorial Airport Projects .............................................................................................. 10 Jefferson City Memorial Airport – Runway 9/27 .................................................................................. 11 Jefferson City Memorial Airport – Runway 9 and 9/27 ........................................................................ 11 Jefferson City Memorial Airport – Control Tower ................................................................................. 12 Jefferson City Memorial Airport – Runway 12/30 ................................................................................ 13 Pedestrian / Non-Motorized ...................................................................................................................... 14 S. Summit Drive, Simon to Center ......................................................................................................... 15 Missouri Blvd, W. Main St. to Stadium Blvd ......................................................................................... 16 Bolivar St. Greenway .............................................................................................................................. 17 Southwest Blvd & Dix Rd Intersection ................................................................................................... 18 Dix Road, W. Main to Missouri Blvd ...................................................................................................... 19 Karen Dr, Center to Thompson .............................................................................................................. 20 Halifax Rd, Center to Nieman ................................................................................................................ 21 Route T, Henwick Ln to Bus 50 W .......................................................................................................... 22 Bike Lane Installation in CAMPO Region ............................................................................................... 23 CAMPO Greenway Connectivity ............................................................................................................ 24 Jefferson City Greenway Projects .......................................................................................................... 25 Missouri Blvd and S. Ten Mile, Stoneridge Pkwy to S. Country Club ................................................... 26 Taos Sidewalk Expansion ....................................................................................................................... 27 Taos Trail Connectivity ........................................................................................................................... 28 3 | Page Illustrative Projects List The Illustrative Projects List was put together as a reference of projects important to the region. It includes a financial plan for additional projects that could be completed if additional resources beyond those that are already prioritized becomes available. This report outlines projects that are listed as Multi-Modal and Pedestrian/Non-Motorized, only. The full Illustrative Projects List can be found in Section 6 of CAMPO’s Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP). Each project listed in Figure 1 indicates what the project entails, where the project is at, which local jurisdiction the project would take place in, estimated cost, if it involves a state-maintained roadway, and what tier the project falls in. There are only tier 2 and tier 3 projects in the Multi-Modal and Pedestrian/Non-Motorized projects. Tier 2 projects are recognized as a high priority project, as indicated by the Board of Directors, stakeholders, and the public. They also support increased motorized and non-motorized safety and system performance. Tier 3 projects are designated as a need by stakeholders and the general public. 4 | Page Figure 1 Num Category Sub-Cat Tier Location Jurisdiction Cost Project State 18 Multi-Modal Transit 2 JEFFTRAN Transit Facilities Jefferson City $5M- $10M Construction of a new facilities for JEFFTRAN that would provide better accommodations for transit riders and staff, including, but not limited to; a bus barn, washing bays, central maintenance facilities, and administraive offices No 19 Multi-Modal Rail 2 Jefferson City Amtrak Station Jefferson City <$100M Renovation or replacement of the Amtrak Train Station in Jefferson City No 20 Multi-Modal Port 2 Missouri River Port Jefferson City/ Cole County/ Callaway County $10M<Construction of a port facility in either Callaway County or Cole County as specified in the Central Missouri Multimodal Port Feasibility Study.No 27 Multi-Modal Airport 2 Jefferson City Memorial Airport Jefferson City $1M-$5M Reconstruction of Runway 9/27 No 28 Multi-Modal Airport 2 Jefferson City Memorial Airport Jefferson City $1M-$5M Construction of new air traffic control tower.No 37 Multi-Modal Airport 3 Jefferson City Memorial Airport - Runway 9 and 9/27 Jefferson City $5M- $10M Relocate Runway 9 and Extend Runway 9/27 at the Jefferson City Memorial Airport.No 38 Multi-Modal Airport 3 Jefferson City Memorial Airport - Runway 12/30 Jefferson City $10M<Extension and Widening of runway 12/30 at the Jefferson City Memorial Airport.No 10 Pedestrian/Non- Motorized Sidewalk 2 S. Summit Drive, Simon to Center Holts Summit $500K- $1M Install sidewalks with some curb and gutter and drop inlets No 11 Pedestrian/Non- Motorized Sidewalk 2 Missouri Blvd, W. Main St. to Stadium Blvd.Jefferson City $1M-$5M Complete connectivity between segments of sidewalk and install crosswalks/pedestrian refuges as needed.Yes 24 Pedestrian/Non- Motorized Sidewalk/ Bicycle 3 Bolivar St. Greenway Jefferson City $500k- $1M Design and construct a greenway extension from the Dunklin St. Trailhead to McCarty St.No 44 Pedestrian/Non- Motorized Sidewalk 3 Southwest Blvd & Dix Rd Intersection Jefferson City < $50K Install pedestrian-activated beacon or similar warning device No 45 Pedestrian/Non- Motorized Sidewalk/ Bicycle 3 Dix Road, W. Main to Missouri Bl Jefferson City < $500k Improve bicycle and pedestrian facilities along the corridor No 50 Pedestrian/Non- Motorized Sidewalk 3 Karen Dr, Center to Thompson Holts Summit $500K- $1M Install sidewalk and crosswalks No 51 Pedestrian/Non- Motorized Sidewalk 3 Halifax Rd, Center to Nieman Holts Summit $500K- $1M Install sidewalk and crosswalks No 52 Pedestrian/Non- Motorized Sidewalk/ Bicycle 3 Route T, Henwick Ln to Bus 50 W St. Martins/ Cole County $1M-$5M Install shoulders to accomodate cyclists and pedestrians.Yes 53 Pedestrian/Non- Motorized Bicycle 3 Bike lane installation in CAMPO Region CAMPO $50K- $100k Continue expansion of bike lanes in the downtown area.No 54 Pedestrian/Non- Motorized Sidewalk/ Bicycle 3 CAMPO Greenway Connectivity CAMPO $10M<Continue to expand greenways to connect cities in the CAMPO Region No 55 Pedestrian/Non- Motorized Sidewalk 3 Jefferson City Greenway Projects Jefferson City $50k-$1M Locations may include; Fairgrounds Acres to County Park, South Country Club Drive to Turtle Creek subdivision, Ellis-Porter Riverside Park connector from St. Louis Road, Wears Creek to East Branch Connector, Frog Hollow Phase 4, Creek Trail to W. Edgewood, JCMG to Satinwood, Dunklin to W. Main via Bolivar, Aurora Park to Ellis Blvd No 56 Pedestrian/Non- Motorized Sidewalk 3 Missouri Blvd and S. Ten MIle, Stoneridge Pkwy to S. Country Club Jefferson City $1M-$5M Install Sidewalks and crosswalks along route with pedestrian accesss over MO 179 provided via a pedestrian bridge connecting S. Ten Mile east and west segments Yes 58 Pedestrian/Non- Motorized Sidewalk 3 Taos Sidewalk expansion Taos $1M-$5M Extend sidewalk along Route M north and south of existing sidewalk.No 59 Pedestrian/Non- Motorized Sidewalk 3 Taos Trail Connectivity Taos < $500k Create sidewalk/trail connection between Route M sidewalk and Countryside Park trail.No 5 | Page Multi-Modal The first category that is listed is Multi-Modal projects. A project can be listed as Multi-Modal if it includes a different form of transportation such as Transit, Rail, Port, or Airport. Within the MTP, one of CAMPO’s goals is to maintain and/or increase the current level of service for urban and rural public transportation. There are 7 projects listed in the Illustrative Projects List that are categorized as Multi-Modal, of which 5 of these projects are tier 2 projects, with the other 2 projects being in tier 3. None of the 7 projects are on a state system roadway. One project is Transit, one is Rail, one is Port, and 4 projects are for the Airport. Each project is listed in Figure 1 and mapped in Figure 2. Figure 2 6 | Page JEFFTRAN Transit Facilities The first project on the Illustrative Projects List for Multi-Modal is the JEFFTRAN Transit Facilities. This project can be found as #18 in the Illustrative Projects List located in the MTP. The list indicates a need for the construction of new facilities for JEFFTRAN that would provide better accommodations for transit riders and staff, including, but not limited to; a bus barn, washing bays, central maintenance facilities, and administrative offices. On February 22, 2021, the City of Jefferson in association with CAMPO opened a request for the services of a consulting firm to perform a Transit Facilities Feasibility Study. The purpose of this feasibility study is to evaluate the existing transit facilities and location, identify facility needs and options, give a cost estimate, and provide a conclusion of study and recommendation. This study was needed to look at the feasibility of replacing a number of facilities which are nearing the end of their useful life. Multiple locations offer and can help with specific needs for the purpose of meeting these potential scenarios that the contractor would need to look at; • Replacement of the transit bus transfer and transit admin facility across the street from the current location. Part of this may also be to consider the location and type of secondary bus transfer facility on the west side of town, currently located between Walmart and Menards. • Replacement of the central maintenance facility at the city’s Hyde Park location. • Look at the replacement of the bus wash facility to a location not yet determined, but thought to be Miller St. or Hyde Park. • The potential replacement of the fueling facility located at Miller St. complex. • Consideration of the repurposing or updating of the current administration, central maintenance, and bus bar facilities for transit use. • Lastly, evaluate the remodeling or reconstruction of the transit administration building in the existing location. This feasibility study is currently in progress. Once the consultant is complete with the study and presents their conclusions and recommendations, the extent of the unfunded need with be better understood. 7 | Page Jefferson City Amtrak Station The second project in the Multi-Modal category of the Illustrative Projects List is the Jefferson City Amtrak Station. This project is listed as #19 in the Illustrative List in the MTP. The project calls for renovations or replacement of the Amtrak Train Station in Jefferson City. The current Amtrak terminal is housed in a small trailer located in a parking lot, seen in Figure 3. Because of this, many riders are forced to stand out in the weather to wait on the train. The terminal was previously housed in the old Union Hotel building built in the 19th century, but after recent flooding and building deterioration, the terminal building was ruled as structurally unsound in 2019. With the pandemic, flooding, and other issues that have impacted rail travel, Amtrak has seen a decrease in ridership over the last several years of people arriving and departing Jefferson City. Figure 3 8 | Page Missouri River Port The Missouri River Port is listed as #20 on the Illustrative List. The project calls for the construction of a port facility in either Callaway County or Cole County as specified in the Central Missouri Multimodal Port Feasibility Study. In 2018, a feasibility study was completed by the Jefferson City Area Chamber of Commerce with association with Hanson Professional Services Inc., for a multimodal port facility in central Missouri. The idea is to add a port facility within the Jefferson City area to help spur local economic development. The full purpose of the study was to assess the market feasibility of logistics-based development opportunities, develop a conceptual site plan, conduct a benefit-cost analysis of the potential multimodal port site, and quantify the economic and fiscal impacts arising from the identified development opportunity. In the study, 2 sites were identified as possible locations for a port, as seen in Figure 4. The first site indicated in the report is the South Site. The site is located on a 125-acre plot of land near the Missouri National Guard site. This site would offer easy access to the Union Pacific rail lines. It would also offer easy access to Highway 50/63 through Militia Drive. This would increase freight traffic through the center part of Jefferson City on Highway 50/63. The second site is located on the north side of the river. This site is on a 23-acre plot of land. This site would offer easy access to Highway 94 in Callaway County once a road is constructed to the site that is capable of handling freight traffic. Hanson Professional Services Inc. concluded that the port facility would need to capture a minimum of 30 to 40 percent of the potential market to be viable and self-sustaining. Given that only about 38 percent of the total market potential is with origin and destination greater than 500 miles, meaning that the port would have to be competitive for shorter distance hauls which are more challenging. 9 | Page Figure 4 10 | Page Jefferson City Memorial Airport Projects The remaining 4 projects listed as Multi-Modal in the Illustrative List are all Jefferson City Memorial Airport projects. In 2018, an Airport Master Plan was completed with assistance by Jviation, an airport planning and consulting firm, outlining plans for the next 20 years of the airport. The purpose of this study and plan is to address the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)’s recommendations and requirements for current and future air travel. The 4 projects in the Illustrative List are represented in the Airport Master Plan with specific recommendations. All 4 projects can be seen in Figure 5. The 4 projects are; • Reconstruction of Runway 9/27 • Relocate Runway 9 and Extend Runway 9/27 • Construction of New Air Traffic Control Tower • Extension and Widening of Runway 12/30 Figure 5 is a full blueprint, produced by Jviation, that shows all 4 projects that are represented in the Illustrative Projects List. The full explanation of the projects, as well as several other projects that are not represented in the Illustrative Projects List, can be found in the 2018 Airport Master Plan. Figure 5 11 | Page Jefferson City Memorial Airport – Runway 9/27 The 1st of the 4 Airport projects is number 27 on the Illustrative List, the reconstruction of runway 9/27. In Figure 6, you can see runway 9/27 running roughly west to east. The runway measures 3,401 feet long by 75 feet wide. Runway 9/27 is dedicated as a visual runway, providing no instrument approach procedures. The 2nd airport project on this list also addresses this same runway. This runway needs the taxiway extended to the full length of the runway to better accommodate air travel and airplane maneuverability across the airport. This runway reconstruction and taxiway expansion is proposed to better accommodate a future increase in air travel demand as outlined in the Airport Master Plan. Figure 6 Jefferson City Memorial Airport – Runway 9 and 9/27 The 2nd airport project in the Multi-Modal category of the Illustrative list is the relocation of runway 9 and extend runway 9/27 at the Jefferson City Memorial Airport. This is project number 37 in the Illustrative Projects List located in the MTP. As discussed in the 1st airport project, runway 9/27 is very limiting in its size and capabilities for modern aircraft. With a runway length of only 3,401 feet, only the smallest of aircraft can use this runway. In the Airport Master Plan is it proposed to extend this runway out 1,000 feet to a total of 4,400 feet. This would be to accommodate a greater share of small aircraft, meet the needs of a growing general aviation fleet of faster, more demanding aircraft, and remain consistent with the recommendation in the master plan. Figure 7 12 | Page Jefferson City Memorial Airport – Control Tower The 3rd airport project on the Illustrative List is the Air Traffic Control Tower. The project is number 28 on the Illustrative Projects List in the Multi-Modal section. The air traffic control tower, seen in Figure 8, was built as a temporary structure in 1973 and has served over 2 million aircraft operations during its 48-year history. The project is proposed because the tower has exceeded its useful life and it is recommended that it be replaced. The FAA uses an Object Discrimination Analysis and Line of Sight Angle of Incidence tool to determine the optimal eye height for an air traffic control operator. It was determined at Jefferson City Memorial Airport that the optimal height was between 61 and 67 feet above ground level. The current tower sits approximately 29 feet about ground level. Because of the discrepancy in height and what the FAA requires, as well as the current towers wood structure that has been exposed to flooding, it was recommended in the Airport Master Plan that the tower be replaced. Figure 8 13 | Page Jefferson City Memorial Airport – Runway 12/30 The 4th airport project in the Multi-Modal category of the Illustrative Projects List is the extension of runway 12/30. This is project number 38 in the Illustrative Projects List located in the MTP In Figure 10 you can see runway 12/30 roughly northwest to southeast. The current runway measures 6,001 feet long by 100 feet wide. The 2018 Airport Master Plan lists recommendations for future development of the airport to meet FAA requirements, one of which is to extend runway 12/30 to 7,000 feet long and 150 feet wide, as well as extending the taxiway to meet the extended runway length (seen in figure 9). While the Jefferson City Airport can accommodate the current design aircraft, the future design of larger, more capable, aircraft are more demanding and require a longer and wider runway. Accommodating these and similar aircraft will increase the Airport’s accessibility and value to the region. Figure 9 14 | Page Pedestrian / Non-Motorized The second category in the Illustrative Projects List in this report is Pedestrian/Non-Motorized projects. Within the MTP, CAMPO sets a goal with this category to increase funding to support safety improvements to pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure at the local level. There are 15 unfunded projects in this category that make this list. Of those 15 projects, 2 are tier 2 projects, while the remaining 13 are listed as tier 3 projects. These 15 projects take place across multiple jurisdictions within the CAMPO region but only 4 projects take place on a state-maintained roadway. Figure 10 shows the approximate location of the projects that are in the Illustrative Projects List. Figure 10 15 | Page S. Summit Drive, Simon to Center Project #10 - South Summit Drive is proposed to install sidewalk with a curb and gutter to complete the stretch from Simon to Center. Figure 11 shows the project proposal in the last TAP application. Figure 11 16 | Page Missouri Blvd, W. Main St. to Stadium Blvd Project #11 – Missouri Blvd from W. Main St. to Stadium Blvd is proposed to complete connectivity between segments of sidewalk and install crosswalks/pedestrian refuges as needed. Recently most of the sidewalks have been completed but crosswalks still need to be installed, especially across Missouri Blvd. Figure 12 shows the current sidewalks on Missouri Blvd. Figure 12 17 | Page Bolivar St. Greenway Project #24 – The Bolivar Street Greenway has been proposed to connect the existing greenway trail at Dunklin Street Trailhead to McCarty Street. Figure 13 shows future greenway possibilities. Figure 13 18 | Page Southwest Blvd & Dix Rd Intersection Project #44 – Southwest Blvd and Dix Rd intersection is proposed to install pedestrian – activated beacon or similar warning device. Figure 14 shows the intersection and crosswalks where a beacon is needed. Figure 14 19 | Page Dix Road, W. Main to Missouri Blvd Project #45 – Dix Road from W. Main to Missouri Blvd project has been included to the list to improve bicycle and pedestrian facilities along the corridor. In Figure 15, you can see the future plans for greenway connectors along Dix Road as well as the existing sidewalks along the road. Figure 15 20 | Page Karen Dr, Center to Thompson Project #50 – Is a project proposed to install sidewalks and crosswalks along Karen Drive from Center Street to Thompson. In Figure 16, you can see there are no sidewalks along Karen Drive currently and the proposed project would help connect a pedestrian path that would cross the highway. Figure 16 21 | Page Halifax Rd, Center to Nieman Project #51 – Is a project to install sidewalks and crosswalks along Halifax Road from Center Street to Nieman Road. In Figure 17, there is new sidewalks along Halifax Road past the intersection with Nieman Road, this project would connect project 50 and the existing sidewalk. Figure 17 22 | Page Route T, Henwick Ln to Bus 50 W Project #52 – The project that has been proposed would be to install shoulders to accommodate cyclists and pedestrians along Route T from Henwick Ln to Business 50 W, as seen in Figure 18. It would be similar to what was installed along Business 50 and would connect to it. Figure 18 23 | Page Bike Lane Installation in CAMPO Region Project #53 – This project was proposed to install bike lanes in the CAMPO Region, more specifically in the downtown section of Jefferson City. In Figure 19, you can see the existing bike lanes in yellow. This project would connect the lanes by adding more in various locations as well as connecting to future Greenway trails. Figure 19 24 | Page CAMPO Greenway Connectivity Project #54 – CAMPO Greenway Connectivity is a project intended to continue to expand the Greenway Trails to connect the towns in the CAMPO region. That includes St. Martins, Holts Summit, Taos, and Wardsville. In Figure 20, you can see some of the proposed future Greenway trails that could connect some of these towns. Figure 20 25 | Page Jefferson City Greenway Projects Project #55 – The Jefferson City Greenway Projects was proposed to expand the Greenway Trails in various locations in Jefferson City. The locations include; Fairgrounds Acres to County Park, South Country Club Drive to Turtle Creek subdivision, Ellis-Porter Riverside Park connector from St. Louis Road, Wears Creek to East Branch Connector, Frog Hollow Phase 4, Creek Trail to W. Edgewood, JCMG to Satinwood, Dunklin to W. Main via Bolivar, and Aurora Park to Ellis Blvd. All of which you can see in the future Greenways in Figure 21. Figure 21 26 | Page Missouri Blvd and S. Ten Mile, Stoneridge Pkwy to S. Country Club Project #56 – This project is to install sidewalks and crosswalks along Missouri Blvd and S. Ten Mile Drive with pedestrian access over MO 179 provided via a pedestrian bridge connecting S. Ten Mile Drive east and west segments. In Figure 22, you can see the segment on S. Ten Mile Drive. Figure 22 27 | Page Taos Sidewalk Expansion Project #58 – The Taos Sidewalk Expansion is intended to extend sidewalks along Route M north and south of the existing sidewalk in Taos. In Figure 23, you can see the future sidewalk expansion along Route M. Figure 23 28 | Page Taos Trail Connectivity Project #59 – In the proposed Taos Trail Connectivity project, a sidewalk or trail connection between Route M sidewalk and Countryside Park trail would be installed (seen in Figure 24). Figure 24 Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. CAMPO Technical Committee Staff Report Capital Area Pedestrian & Bicycle Plan Update Sub-Committee June 3, 2021 Summary Staff has started the process of updating the 2016 Capital Area Pedestrian & Bicycle Plan. A major component of that update process is public and stakeholder involvement. Staff is requesting the Technical Committee create a sub-committee to work with staff in the update process. Recommended participants include: • MoDOT • JEFFTRAN • Cole County Public Works • City of Jefferson – Parks & Recreation • City of Jefferson – PW/Engineering • City of Jefferson – Police Department • City of Jefferson – PPS • Holts Summit Representative • Other CAMPO Technical Committee Members. • Minority Community Representative(s) • Community Member(s) Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Technical Committee form a sub-committee based on the above identified stakeholder groups. Agenda Item 7A Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. CAMPO Technical Committee Staff Report Status of Current Work Tasks June 3, 2021 Summary The following list includes work tasks that are currently in progress or have been completed since the previous meeting: • Jefferson City Data Assistance. Staff is working with other Jefferson City planners in providing data and mapping assistance in the update of the of the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The plan is anticipated to be adopted in June. • Major Thoroughfare Plan Development. Staff continues work on the Major Thoroughfare Plan in conjunction with the development of the Jefferson City Comprehensive Plan. The Major Thoroughfare Plan will be developed through stakeholder input and will pull directly from the 2018 Travel Demand Model. • JEFFTRAN Transit Facility Feasibility Study RFQ. An RFQ was advertised in March with no submissions received. Jefferson City Public Works staff is reviewing the RFQ language and will re-advertise soon. • JC Parks GIS Assistance. Staff is provided technical assistance regarding GIS data and mapping of trails and greenway. Agenda Item 7B