HomeMy Public PortalAbout2005-9O RESOLUTION NO. 2005 - 9
A RESOLUTION AFFIRMING
H. A. PARTS PRODUCTS OF INDIANA COMPANY (2001 Expansion)
OF COMPLIANCE WITH STATEMENTS OF BENEFITS
WHEREAS, H. A. Parts Products of Indiana Company has heretofore been granted certain
tax abatements in consideration of certain benefits for the City of Greencastle; and,
WHEREAS, said company has submitted a form CF -1/RE as of March 1, 2005 for tax
abatement granted in 2001; and
WHEREAS, the Greencastle Common Council has reviewed the CF -1/RE form, a copy of
which is attached hereto, and has found compliance with the Statements of Benefits as approved by
the Greencastle Common Council;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Common Council of the City of
Greencastle, Putnam County, Indiana, approves the CF -I/RE form as submitted as being in
compliance with the Statements of Benefits previously filed by H. A. Parts Products of Indiana
Company.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution of the Greencastle Common Council be
® made a record and filed along with the CF- I/RE form with the Putnam County Auditor.
PASSED by the Common Council of the City of Greencastle at its regular meeting this 10th
day of May, 2005.
COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRE • VCA INDIANA
Russell Evans M k N. Hammer
Lanie
P. Sedlack
�21L w
Thomas W. Roach
Approved and signed by me this 10th day of May, 2005 L p.m. o'clock.
Nancy A. ichael, Mayor
ATT
Teresa Glenn, Clerk- Treasurer
COMPLIANCE WITH STATEMENT OF BENEFITS
REAL ESTATE IMPROVEMENTS CF -01RRE
Slate Farm 51768 (5.04)
Prescrlbod by the Depandent of Local Gwemnent Fiance
INSMUCTIDNS. 1. Pmperty owners whose Sbfament of6anellts was appmved eRerJUne 30, 1991 mus (ate INS Imn wRh Me Coun(yAudRw and the
® local DoslgneOng Body to ahow the esiaMto whkh Mere has boon mnVoRmoe the Slatoment orBomms.(This Class no(epply
to pmpedy localad In a rasldmUely dlalmaud area). fIC S-1.1. 121 -6.6)
2 This (mm must be Ned v M the It" deduction applkehbn and than ermue0y whh/n sbrly (110) days aRer Me and of each yoarin
which Me Mulmlim Is epp0mebla.
1 NWh Me approval of the designaMg body, compllance Mrommoon rormdnpa pmiects may be oansoftmd on me (i) comp6anca
roan (CF -0.
L
JN M�1
0 Prom Mule .Paget - Copyright 0200701S. arc
CenvLvc
1 hetaby certlty Met Ulu raDresenbliam In this statement em true.
Signewro a sulhorked ragreaT!Uv��
3
T7e
' Wei AL Na !_r o�
SECTION I
TAXPAYER INFORMATION
Namealaapayar
R.A. Parts Products of Indiana Company — DBA —
HAPPICO
Addmeealleapayer I abea andnumber, dry, elate and ZIP mdu)
2200 State Road 240 E
Greencastle IN 46135
Name of carpet! peremn
Tebphone number
Michael S. Burns
(765)653- 2000eaL210
Name of deslgnatbrg body
Resolulbn nunber
Greencastle Common Council
2001 -5
Locetknaprcpaly 2200 State Road 240 E
county
Taring d15M
Greencastle IN 46135
Putnam
Greencastle City
Description of mst properly Impmvemenb:
Esdro algid stating data
See attached
03/01/2001
Fslmaed completion dale
07/25/2001
SE C -. ION 3 EI.',PLOYEES AND SALARIES
Custard manta of amplayeas
402 526
Sala o
13,400,000 16,559,090
Nuvlbar of employees retained
482 4B2
Searles
13,400,000 15,113,837
Number of additional employees
44
Selnras
-
1,305,163
Assessed Value
bebta
14, 700, 000
1,660,170
alues a sd
2, 000, 000
7fta;
Volde,of bin re aced
Yw tom otlon a
16, 700, 000
1, 660, 170
Assessed Value
estate
14, 700, 000
1, 66 D, 770
aluesd roposed ended
7
2,075,900
Less:V.W..faypqrtybhg.pid
Nat vawes upon conaphallon a pooled
16.775.900
3,736,670
NOTE: The COST of Un property Is cadden9st pursuant to IC 8.1.1. 12.1.6.8 III)
SECTIONS WASTE CONVERTED AND OTHER BENEFITS
Amount of solid waste mmmrled
PRO. BY
TAXPAYER
Amount of hamrdoes wash cowarled
77
Dlha beneBls:
JN M�1
0 Prom Mule .Paget - Copyright 0200701S. arc
CenvLvc
1 hetaby certlty Met Ulu raDresenbliam In this statement em true.
Signewro a sulhorked ragreaT!Uv��
3
T7e
' Wei AL Na !_r o�
Dale signed (mo., Clay, N
. OJ
JN M�1
0 Prom Mule .Paget - Copyright 0200701S. arc
CenvLvc
-. )AI IwVnmtn i w l-UKM U-1, page 7, secnon z
Name WWVOW
H.A. Parts Products of Indiana Company - DBA - HAPPICO
0
A
(72,000 sq ft) s
Ll
FOR USE OF THE DESIGNATING BODY
INSTRUCTIONS: (IC8.1.i- 121•agJ
I- YYdhin hely.Me(Wil days ederrecelpf ofthts forth, the deslgnafhp body may determine whether ornof the property o,,,whes Substantially compiled with
the Statement ofsenegts.
® 2 1111111 paper!)( ownerIs found NOT to be In substantial compliance, the destrafing body shag tamd 0e properly ownerw when nolka The nolke, must Include
the reasons for tine detemtlna(lon and the dear, time and place of a hearing to he conducted by the designating body.
I Basedan the lnlormalbn prosentedef the hearing, the designating body May defemdne whetherornot( he popenyownerhas mew reasonable e9odro
substantially corrmpy with the Statement of Benefits.
4. 11(he designating body determines Nat the property ownerlws NOT made reasonable eyod to comply, men the designating body shag adopt a resolution
forminabng the deduction. The distorting body shelf Immedietey may a ceriMed copy of the rescru fn (0.'(1) the properly mmerand (2) Me CounlyAudifor.
We have reviewed the CF -t and find that
HEARING RESULTS flu be CcInpleled after file h caring)
❑ Approved ❑ Denied see lnSWCUon 4 above)
J&] the property awner IS In substantial compliance
Signature or authorized member
❑ the property comer IS NOT In subsbntlal compliance
Arrested by
❑ other (specW)
Reasons far the determinailon (attach addbknal sheets )(necessary)
Signature augwdzed
Dale signed (month, day, yW
0. A. Michael, Mayor
May 10, 2005
DesignaWp body
Teresa Glenn, Cl irk-Treasurer
Greencastle City Council
If the property owner Is found not to be In substantial compliance, tire property owner shall scathe the opportunity for a hearing. The
following date and time has been set aside for Ule purpose of considering compliance.
Time or hearing
Dale of haft
Location of heaft
[:]AM ❑Pa1
APPEAL RIGHTS DC 8.1.1421- MO(e)l
A property owner whose deduction is denied by the designating body may appeal the designating body's decision by filing a
complaint in the office of the Circuit or Superior Court together with a bond conditioned to pay the costs of the appeal if the
appeal Is determined against the property owner.
0 For CF.i1RE, page 2- COpyrlgh1 0 2005 019. Inn
ClhaVLW
HEARING RESULTS flu be CcInpleled after file h caring)
❑ Approved ❑ Denied see lnSWCUon 4 above)
Reasons for determslabon (atiadc addiymd Shasta Mneressary)
Signature or authorized member
Date stoned (mont), day, year)
Arrested by
Deslgnaling body
APPEAL RIGHTS DC 8.1.1421- MO(e)l
A property owner whose deduction is denied by the designating body may appeal the designating body's decision by filing a
complaint in the office of the Circuit or Superior Court together with a bond conditioned to pay the costs of the appeal if the
appeal Is determined against the property owner.
0 For CF.i1RE, page 2- COpyrlgh1 0 2005 019. Inn
ClhaVLW
H.A. Parts Products of Indiana Company
® A STATEMENT ATTACHED TO AND MADE PART OF FORM CF -1/RE
COMPLIANCE WITH STATEMENT OF BENEFITS
REAL ESTATE IMPROVEMENTS
The foregoing tax return was prepared by the undersigned or under their
direction. The facts stated therein were obtained from the taxpayer's records and other
sources considered to be reliable and are believed to be true and correct.
® Richard E. Boer, Jr. Date
Representative of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
300 North Meridian Street, Suite 1700
Indianapolis, IN 46204
FEIN: 13- 4008324