Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout2005-9O RESOLUTION NO. 2005 - 9 A RESOLUTION AFFIRMING H. A. PARTS PRODUCTS OF INDIANA COMPANY (2001 Expansion) OF COMPLIANCE WITH STATEMENTS OF BENEFITS WHEREAS, H. A. Parts Products of Indiana Company has heretofore been granted certain tax abatements in consideration of certain benefits for the City of Greencastle; and, WHEREAS, said company has submitted a form CF -1/RE as of March 1, 2005 for tax abatement granted in 2001; and WHEREAS, the Greencastle Common Council has reviewed the CF -1/RE form, a copy of which is attached hereto, and has found compliance with the Statements of Benefits as approved by the Greencastle Common Council; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Common Council of the City of Greencastle, Putnam County, Indiana, approves the CF -I/RE form as submitted as being in compliance with the Statements of Benefits previously filed by H. A. Parts Products of Indiana Company. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution of the Greencastle Common Council be ® made a record and filed along with the CF- I/RE form with the Putnam County Auditor. PASSED by the Common Council of the City of Greencastle at its regular meeting this 10th day of May, 2005. COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GRE • VCA INDIANA Russell Evans M k N. Hammer Lanie P. Sedlack �21L w Thomas W. Roach Approved and signed by me this 10th day of May, 2005 L p.m. o'clock. Nancy A. ichael, Mayor ATT Teresa Glenn, Clerk- Treasurer COMPLIANCE WITH STATEMENT OF BENEFITS REAL ESTATE IMPROVEMENTS CF -01RRE Slate Farm 51768 (5.04) Prescrlbod by the Depandent of Local Gwemnent Fiance INSMUCTIDNS. 1. Pmperty owners whose Sbfament of6anellts was appmved eRerJUne 30, 1991 mus (ate INS Imn wRh Me Coun(yAudRw and the ® local DoslgneOng Body to ahow the esiaMto whkh Mere has boon mnVoRmoe the Slatoment orBomms.(This Class no(epply to pmpedy localad In a rasldmUely dlalmaud area). fIC S-1.1. 121 -6.6) 2 This (mm must be Ned v M the It" deduction applkehbn and than ermue0y whh/n sbrly (110) days aRer Me and of each yoarin which Me Mulmlim Is epp0mebla. 1 NWh Me approval of the designaMg body, compllance Mrommoon rormdnpa pmiects may be oansoftmd on me (i) comp6anca roan (CF -0. L JN M�1 0 Prom Mule .Paget - Copyright 0200701S. arc CenvLvc 1 hetaby certlty Met Ulu raDresenbliam In this statement em true. Signewro a sulhorked ragreaT!Uv�� 3 T7e ' Wei AL Na !_r o� SECTION I TAXPAYER INFORMATION Namealaapayar R.A. Parts Products of Indiana Company — DBA — HAPPICO Addmeealleapayer I abea andnumber, dry, elate and ZIP mdu) 2200 State Road 240 E Greencastle IN 46135 Name of carpet! peremn Tebphone number Michael S. Burns (765)653- 2000eaL210 Name of deslgnatbrg body Resolulbn nunber Greencastle Common Council 2001 -5 Locetknaprcpaly 2200 State Road 240 E county Taring d15M Greencastle IN 46135 Putnam Greencastle City Description of mst properly Impmvemenb: Esdro algid stating data See attached 03/01/2001 Fslmaed completion dale 07/25/2001 SE C -. ION 3 EI.',PLOYEES AND SALARIES Custard manta of amplayeas 402 526 Sala o 13,400,000 16,559,090 Nuvlbar of employees retained 482 4B2 Searles 13,400,000 15,113,837 Number of additional employees 44 Selnras - 1,305,163 Assessed Value bebta 14, 700, 000 1,660,170 alues a sd 2, 000, 000 7fta; Volde,of bin re aced Yw tom otlon a 16, 700, 000 1, 660, 170 Assessed Value estate 14, 700, 000 1, 66 D, 770 aluesd roposed ended 7 2,075,900 Less:V.W..faypqrtybhg.pid Nat vawes upon conaphallon a pooled 16.775.900 3,736,670 NOTE: The COST of Un property Is cadden9st pursuant to IC 8.1.1. 12.1.6.8 III) SECTIONS WASTE CONVERTED AND OTHER BENEFITS Amount of solid waste mmmrled PRO. BY TAXPAYER Amount of hamrdoes wash cowarled 77 Dlha beneBls: JN M�1 0 Prom Mule .Paget - Copyright 0200701S. arc CenvLvc 1 hetaby certlty Met Ulu raDresenbliam In this statement em true. Signewro a sulhorked ragreaT!Uv�� 3 T7e ' Wei AL Na !_r o� Dale signed (mo., Clay, N . OJ JN M�1 0 Prom Mule .Paget - Copyright 0200701S. arc CenvLvc -. )AI IwVnmtn i w l-UKM U-1, page 7, secnon z Name WWVOW H.A. Parts Products of Indiana Company - DBA - HAPPICO 0 A (72,000 sq ft) s Ll FOR USE OF THE DESIGNATING BODY INSTRUCTIONS: (IC8.1.i- 121•agJ I- YYdhin hely.Me(Wil days ederrecelpf ofthts forth, the deslgnafhp body may determine whether ornof the property o,,,whes Substantially compiled with the Statement ofsenegts. ® 2 1111111 paper!)( ownerIs found NOT to be In substantial compliance, the destrafing body shag tamd 0e properly ownerw when nolka The nolke, must Include the reasons for tine detemtlna(lon and the dear, time and place of a hearing to he conducted by the designating body. I Basedan the lnlormalbn prosentedef the hearing, the designating body May defemdne whetherornot( he popenyownerhas mew reasonable e9odro substantially corrmpy with the Statement of Benefits. 4. 11(he designating body determines Nat the property ownerlws NOT made reasonable eyod to comply, men the designating body shag adopt a resolution forminabng the deduction. The distorting body shelf Immedietey may a ceriMed copy of the rescru fn (0.'(1) the properly mmerand (2) Me CounlyAudifor. We have reviewed the CF -t and find that HEARING RESULTS flu be CcInpleled after file h caring) ❑ Approved ❑ Denied see lnSWCUon 4 above) J&] the property awner IS In substantial compliance Signature or authorized member ❑ the property comer IS NOT In subsbntlal compliance Arrested by ❑ other (specW) Reasons far the determinailon (attach addbknal sheets )(necessary) Signature augwdzed Dale signed (month, day, yW 0. A. Michael, Mayor May 10, 2005 DesignaWp body Teresa Glenn, Cl irk-Treasurer Greencastle City Council If the property owner Is found not to be In substantial compliance, tire property owner shall scathe the opportunity for a hearing. The following date and time has been set aside for Ule purpose of considering compliance. Time or hearing Dale of haft Location of heaft [:]AM ❑Pa1 APPEAL RIGHTS DC 8.1.1421- MO(e)l A property owner whose deduction is denied by the designating body may appeal the designating body's decision by filing a complaint in the office of the Circuit or Superior Court together with a bond conditioned to pay the costs of the appeal if the appeal Is determined against the property owner. 0 For CF.i1RE, page 2- COpyrlgh1 0 2005 019. Inn ClhaVLW HEARING RESULTS flu be CcInpleled after file h caring) ❑ Approved ❑ Denied see lnSWCUon 4 above) Reasons for determslabon (atiadc addiymd Shasta Mneressary) Signature or authorized member Date stoned (mont), day, year) Arrested by Deslgnaling body APPEAL RIGHTS DC 8.1.1421- MO(e)l A property owner whose deduction is denied by the designating body may appeal the designating body's decision by filing a complaint in the office of the Circuit or Superior Court together with a bond conditioned to pay the costs of the appeal if the appeal Is determined against the property owner. 0 For CF.i1RE, page 2- COpyrlgh1 0 2005 019. Inn ClhaVLW H.A. Parts Products of Indiana Company ® A STATEMENT ATTACHED TO AND MADE PART OF FORM CF -1/RE COMPLIANCE WITH STATEMENT OF BENEFITS REAL ESTATE IMPROVEMENTS The foregoing tax return was prepared by the undersigned or under their direction. The facts stated therein were obtained from the taxpayer's records and other sources considered to be reliable and are believed to be true and correct. ® Richard E. Boer, Jr. Date Representative of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 300 North Meridian Street, Suite 1700 Indianapolis, IN 46204 FEIN: 13- 4008324