Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAboutCanyon Springs EIR Scoping - 46-1.pdfGiven by: Ronald T. Milam, AICP, PTP November 2010 " Early America 0 . R M w " Post World War II " ,,%.. - Me w p t FEHR s NIAS " ,,%.. - Me w p Early 20th Century Area dedicated to driving and parking = 21.5 Early 21st Century Area dedicated to driving and parking = 37.5% EXECUTIVE ORDER 5 -3 -05 • 2050 -- reduce GHG emissions to 80% below 1990 levels AB 32 (2006) • 2020 --reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels SB 97 (2007) 0 • CEQA analysis of GHG emissions required • Adopt CEQA GHG guidelines by Jan 2010 AB 3005 (2008) • Requires cities, counties to consider lower nexus -based traffic impact fees on development within %: mile of transit station AB 1358 (2008) • Complete streets policy requirement for general plans SIB 375 (2008) • Land use/ transport mandate: regional plans must comply with AB 32 GHG reduction targets • MPO's create "sustainable communities strategies" (Blueprints) that meet targets • RTP funding decisions consistent with sustainable plan • CEQA exemptions, streamlining for projects that conform to regional plans " AGE s Office /NGOs /Unions /Neighborhood Groups - RTPs oeRceb,r - General Plans l omen, I..+uv. - Specific Plans me a.moima em.xanm.nm amu  .0 .bun �, - Roadway Projects pr me Me ^.. . JLWA }� l span j t sal:)iyaA z0:) uoijejaodsueal " Minimize vehicle trips and miles per capita (VMT) " Preserve mobility through location efficiency: compact, connected development, transit, ridesharing, ped and bicycle systems, TDM " Implement low- emission local transportation " Manage traffic flow to avoid "hot spots" with high emissions and energy consumption 3.5 3.0 2 2.5 a s sj, ].0 E b 1.5 A IA 0.5 j Relationship of Freeway LOS, Speed, and CO2 Emissions Factors 5 10 75 20 25 30 35 60 45 50 55 6D 65 Aw ag*V6hIM5p"d (mph) LOS .6.,16. Mo Traditional Transportation Planning Process Land Use Thresholds Based Recommended Planning Transportation Transportation Planning Plan - Lo5 Sized to Threshold - Design Standards Process results in a plan that has unknown costs and is unlikely to be fully implemented resulting in traffic operations that will be worse than projected. The "New" Transportation Planning Process Land Use Constraints Based Recommended Planning Transportation Transportation Planning Plan Funding - Sized to Constraints Environmental for design year Political - ROW based on thresholds r N. 1 rr ji Now . ,, °a 0 E f V i w 70 w so 40 30 30 10 Weekday, Household Generated VMT by Land Use Pattern uninrnrF mtd b D"N" 5R RR "In RmlftY C tyln Tfm Rvmw YgOCounty in 2ms IAn Mmb m y0 sF ,MM m ]r1055KfIMAbdN (RodrrCpF. sRCMM Mo A OkkW"r Uming LowOOn/Am I� UrGn UnM McUeCmler MwtxBxax, IwnIWIFn, MVI Ln FnrrFUcq W 2005 Daily Vehicle Miles of Travel for Yolo County unN ... p.a.G umnao,p..wM udnwrywnw unm..,p,W pi wwel.na o.nl. 11hwl g..mwM. h1. C ... ty bolo C.unry an, C..nry unly An..p. M.... win ICY,F.bu,gl bICeW,,.- 2nyxill.ntlnm C.p.tl F Plating L.ca OWAma 2035 Daily Vehicle Miles of Travel for Yolo County onm.owm.w anm.u.wmw omn.e,vo..µe omn.n,eeu.w WT.n wombna wrh wn rnimele romco.mr mmc..w role co.mq •n,.q, al.,\,e..pl m...19 ". 1[.pvtnlr XMgMllentlNpl VOryI pOfA 9PC81M ReOlonXl Pmryria Bdm[h IRApI 1. Density dwellings, jobs per acre 2. Diversity mix of housing, jobs, retail 3. Design connectivity, walkability 4. Destinations regional accessibility 5. Distance to Transit rail proximity 6. Development Scale pop, jobs 7. Demographics household size, income 8. Demand Management pricing, incentives 1. TIS Guidelines 2. Travel Forecasting Model TNANSPpIGIION IMPACT AYUY 4YIOtLN111 0, ,,.. Thank You Ronald T. Milam, AICP, PTP Fehr & Peers r. milam @fehrandpeers.com www.coolconnections.ora FIMR & PEERS Thank You Ronald T. Milam, AICP, PTP Fehr & Peers r. milam @fehrandpeers.com www.coolconnections.ora Traffic count based estimate (speed not a factor) • Estimate depends on traffic count coverage and quality • Only captures VMT on jurisdiction' s roadways • Citrus Heights = 1,000,110 daily VMT (weekday) r i " Traffic volume and speed based estimate " Volumes derived from trips generated by land uses or activities " Estimate depends on model form, limits, and data quality ' 1 " Can capture VMT multiple ways " Citrus Heights = 1,397,340 daily VMT (weekday) " Updated RTP Guidelines - New modeling requirements for MPOs, RTPAs, and Others - Potential conflicts with congestion relief and air quality objectives http: / /www. dot .ca.gov /hq /tpp /offices /orip /rtp/ index_files /2010 RTP_Guidelines_4- 27- 10.pdf " CEQA Relief? - Qualified transit priority projects may perform a sustainable communities environmental assessment  SCS /APS consistent residential or mixed -use residential projects relieved of analyzing growth inducing impacts plus car and light -duty truck impacts on global warming and the regional transportation network and from commercial trips?) " Spotlight on travel demand models " New interest in best management practices (BMPs) " Shifted Transportation Planning and Impact Focus - Vehicle miles of travel (VMT) - Travel choices - Balancing multiple objectives ���� ouol Illliil _ 11��F,1'_ iililll :- ,.���� _i. - fi w - i i i i i i i i i i i i i i �� I i i i i i i i '# z, 3i s, 10 "1 Ij .r� r /S u Relationship of Freeway LOS, Speed, and CO2 Emissions Factors 3.5 3.0 2.5 a 3.0 E 1.5 I 1.0 O.S 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 60 64 30 35 60 65 Avw"* V6hkI6 Sp660 N1pN " Traffic count based estimate (speed not a factor) " Estimate depends on traffic count coverage and quality " Only captures VMT on jurisdiction' s roadways " Citrus Heights = 1,000,110 daily VMT r , (weekday) /j Y ' r' " Traffic volume and speed based estimate " Volumes derived from trips generated by land uses or activities " Estimate depends on model form, limits, and , data quality r, " Can capture VMT multiple ways " Citrus Heights = 1,397,340 daily VMT (weekday) What is a VMT Threshold and Why Do I Want It in My General Plan? 2010 APA Conference November 2, 2010 Session Block #3 4:00 to 5:30, Parlor Room PANEL SPEAKERS • Heidi Tschudin, Principal TSCHUDIN CONSULTING GROUP htschudin @sbcglobal.net (916) 447 -1809 • David Morrison, Assistant Director Yolo County Planning and Public Works Department david.morrison@yolocounty.org (530) 555 -8041 • Ron Milam, Principal Fehr and Peers Associates r.milam @fehrandpeers.com (916) 773 -1900 TOPICS • VMT and Land Use • VMT and Transportation Planning • VMT and CEQA • VMT in practice Wo C � I' Yolo County General Plan - Land Use aV e i T µc 04C � 0 Administration Action IN -A2 Revise the Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual to require that Agenda items address the consistency of the proposed action with the General Plan, where appropriate.