HomeMy Public PortalAboutAppendixB_NOP_ScopingMeetingCommentMatrix&Letters.pdf........................................................................................................................
A PPENDIX B
NOP/SCOPING M EETING
C OMMENT M ATRIX AND L ETTERS
DESIGN, COMMUNITY & ENVIRONMENT
The Planning Center | DC&E
Berkeley, Costa Mesa, Los Angeles, Ontario, Salt Lake City, San Diego, Ventura
1625 SHATTUCK AVENUE
SUITE 300
BERKELEY, CA 94709
TEL: 510 848 3815
FAX: 510 848 4315
www.dceplanning.com
MEMORANDUM
DATE June 6, 2011
TO Denyelle Nishimori, Associate, Community Development Department
Town of Truckee
FROM Terri McCracken, Associate, The Planning Center | DC&E
RE Comments Received on the EIR Process from 2003 to 2011 for
proposed residential development on the Canyon Springs Subdivision
Project Site.
Over the past several years, the Canyon Springs Subdivision project site has been the
subject of different residential development proposals including the Tahoe Boca proposal in
2003 and more recently the Canyon Springs proposal in 2007. This proposed Canyon
Springs Subdivision Project is the most recent of these proposals. Throughout the
environmental review process for these proposed developments numerous comments from
public agency and service providers, and members of the public have been submitted. The
attached comment matrix provides a summary of each of the comments and includes
breakdown of key environmental review categories each comment references. The
comment letters are organized into the following sections:
A. Letters Received In Response To The Tahoe Boca Estates Project From
November 2003 – July 2004
B. Letters Received In Response of The Canyon Springs Project From March 2005 to
January 2006
C. Letters Received In Response To The Notice of Preparation of The Canyon
Springs EIR Dated March 18, 2006
D. Letters Received In Response To The Notice Of Availability of the Canyon Springs
EIR Dated April 24, 2007
E. Letters Received In Response To The Town’s Project Routing Request Process for
the Canyon Springs Subdivision EIR July 2010
F. Letters Received In Response To The Notice Of Preparation of The Canyon
Springs Subdivision EIR Dated April 18, 2011
1
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
R
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
E
I
R
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
a
n
y
on
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
n
t
h
e
T
o
w
n
o
f
T
r
u
c
k
e
e
f
r
o
m
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
0
3
t
o
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
1
CO
M
M
E
N
T
O
R
N
A
M
E
AN
D
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
Project Description
Aesthetics
Agriculture and Forestry
Air Quality
Biological Resources
Cultural Resources
Geology / Soils
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Hazards / Hazardous Materials
Hydrology / Water Quality
Land Use and Planning
Mineral Resources
Noise
Population / Housing
Public Services
Recreation
Transportation / Traffic
Utilities / Service Systems
Construction Impacts
Alternatives
Other
Requests to be Notified
SU
M
M
A
R
Y
O
F
CO
M
M
E
N
T
A.
L
e
t
t
e
r
s
R
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
I
n
R
e
s
p
o
n
se
T
o
T
h
e
T
a
h
o
e
B
o
c
a
E
s
t
a
t
e
s
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
F
r
o
m
N
o
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
0
3
–
J
u
l
y
2
0
0
4
Pu
b
l
i
c
A
g
e
n
c
i
e
s
/
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
r
s
A1
D
a
n
L
a
P
l
a
n
t
e
Pl
a
c
e
r
C
o
u
n
t
y
T
a
h
o
e
En
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
10
8
2
5
P
i
o
n
e
e
r
T
r
a
i
l
,
S
t
e
1
0
5
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
1
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
1
9
,
2
0
0
3
Re
q
u
e
s
t
s
t
o
b
e
a
d
d
e
d
t
o
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
in
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
n
o
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
di
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
l
i
s
t
.
Pr
i
v
a
t
e
I
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
s
a
n
d
O
r
g
a
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
s
A2
J
a
n
e
t
D
e
l
i
g
h
t
ja
n
e
t
d
@
j
p
s
.
n
e
t
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
0
3
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
;
ec
o
n
o
m
i
c
s
;
a
f
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
;
in
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
;
p
r
e
p
a
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
an
E
I
R
;
a
n
d
p
r
o
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
o
f
o
p
e
n
sp
a
c
e
.
A3
G
l
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
D
e
v
o
n
s
h
i
r
e
H
O
A
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
1
3
,
2
0
0
3
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
;
wa
t
e
r
s
u
p
p
l
y
;
i
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
im
p
a
c
t
s
;
w
a
s
t
e
w
a
t
e
r
t
r
e
a
t
m
e
n
t
;
pu
b
l
i
c
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
;
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
;
t
o
w
n
bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
;
a
i
r
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
;
a
n
d
s
o
l
i
d
wa
s
t
e
.
2
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
R
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
E
I
R
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
a
n
y
on
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
n
t
h
e
T
o
w
n
o
f
T
r
u
c
k
e
e
f
r
o
m
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
0
3
t
o
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
1
CO
M
M
E
N
T
O
R
N
A
M
E
AN
D
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
Project Description
Aesthetics
Agriculture and Forestry
Air Quality
Biological Resources
Cultural Resources
Geology / Soils
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Hazards / Hazardous Materials
Hydrology / Water Quality
Land Use and Planning
Mineral Resources
Noise
Population / Housing
Public Services
Recreation
Transportation / Traffic
Utilities / Service Systems
Construction Impacts
Alternatives
Other
Requests to be Notified
SU
M
M
A
R
Y
O
F
CO
M
M
E
N
T
A4
C
h
u
c
k
B
r
a
t
l
a
n
d
10
3
9
7
H
a
s
t
i
n
g
s
H
e
i
g
h
t
s
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
1
Br
a
t
l
a
n
d
@
u
s
a
m
e
d
i
a
.
t
v
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
1
8
,
2
0
0
3
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
a
n
d
sa
f
e
t
y
i
n
G
l
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
a
r
e
a
;
w
a
t
e
r
su
p
p
l
y
;
e
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
s
;
c
o
s
t
o
f
p
u
b
l
i
c
se
r
v
i
c
e
s
;
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
o
f
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
op
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
;
a
n
d
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
t
o
pr
o
j
e
c
t
v
e
h
i
c
u
l
a
r
a
c
c
e
s
s
.
Re
q
u
e
s
t
s
t
h
a
t
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
Ed
i
n
b
u
r
g
h
D
r
i
v
e
a
c
c
e
s
s
p
o
i
n
t
b
e
ga
t
e
d
a
n
d
l
o
c
k
e
d
.
A5
L
i
n
d
a
H
o
l
m
a
n
12
0
5
9
W
h
i
t
e
h
o
r
s
e
R
o
a
d
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
1
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
,
2
0
0
3
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
w
i
l
d
l
i
f
e
h
a
b
i
t
a
t
an
d
m
i
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
s
;
we
t
l
a
n
d
s
a
n
d
d
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
a
r
e
a
s
;
an
d
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
.
A6
G
l
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
U
n
i
t
e
d
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
1
,
2
0
0
3
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
zo
n
i
n
g
;
d
e
e
r
m
i
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
;
tr
a
f
f
i
c
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
;
g
r
o
w
t
h
i
n
d
u
c
i
n
g
im
p
a
c
t
s
;
c
u
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
;
ec
o
n
o
m
i
c
s
;
c
o
s
t
o
f
in
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
;
a
f
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
ho
u
s
i
n
g
;
b
i
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
;
em
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
a
n
d
f
i
r
e
pr
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
A7
G
l
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
U
n
i
t
e
d
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
1
,
2
0
0
3
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
zo
n
i
n
g
;
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
;
ec
o
n
o
m
i
c
s
;
s
c
h
o
o
l
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
;
;
c
o
s
t
of
i
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
;
a
n
d
d
e
e
r
im
p
a
c
t
s
.
R
e
q
u
e
s
t
s
t
h
a
t
a
n
E
I
R
b
e
pr
e
p
a
r
e
d
.
3
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
R
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
E
I
R
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
a
n
y
on
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
n
t
h
e
T
o
w
n
o
f
T
r
u
c
k
e
e
f
r
o
m
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
0
3
t
o
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
1
CO
M
M
E
N
T
O
R
N
A
M
E
AN
D
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
Project Description
Aesthetics
Agriculture and Forestry
Air Quality
Biological Resources
Cultural Resources
Geology / Soils
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Hazards / Hazardous Materials
Hydrology / Water Quality
Land Use and Planning
Mineral Resources
Noise
Population / Housing
Public Services
Recreation
Transportation / Traffic
Utilities / Service Systems
Construction Impacts
Alternatives
Other
Requests to be Notified
SU
M
M
A
R
Y
O
F
CO
M
M
E
N
T
A8
A
d
r
i
a
n
J
u
n
c
o
s
a
16
1
7
3
L
a
n
c
a
s
t
e
r
P
l
a
c
e
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
1
aj
u
n
c
o
s
a
@
e
a
r
t
h
l
i
n
k
.
n
e
t
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
1
,
2
0
0
3
Re
q
u
e
s
t
s
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
o
n
t
h
e
En
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
R
e
v
i
e
w
a
n
d
pr
o
j
e
c
t
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
.
R
e
q
u
e
s
t
s
t
o
b
e
ad
d
e
d
t
o
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
no
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
d
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
l
i
s
t
.
A9
M
a
x
i
n
e
a
n
d
J
i
m
R
i
x
ri
x
m
a
x
r
i
x
@
o
n
e
m
a
i
n
.
c
o
m
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
1
,
2
0
0
3
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
w
a
t
e
r
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
;
tr
a
f
f
i
c
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
;
a
n
d
w
a
t
e
r
co
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
.
A1
0
S
t
e
p
h
a
n
i
e
O
l
i
v
e
r
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
2
,
2
0
0
3
Re
q
u
e
s
t
s
a
c
o
p
y
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
ro
u
t
i
n
g
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
b
e
s
e
n
t
t
o
T
e
r
r
y
Wa
t
t
(
o
f
S
i
e
r
r
a
W
a
t
c
h
)
.
A1
1
B
e
v
e
r
l
y
W
h
i
t
t
i
e
r
12
1
3
5
W
h
i
t
e
h
o
r
s
e
R
o
a
d
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
1
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
3
,
2
0
0
3
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
w
a
t
e
r
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
an
d
w
a
t
e
r
s
u
p
p
l
y
;
e
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
ev
a
c
u
a
t
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
o
n
l
y
o
n
e
a
c
c
e
s
s
ro
a
d
;
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
w
i
l
d
l
i
f
e
bu
f
f
e
r
;
c
u
l
t
u
r
a
l
r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
;
w
i
l
d
l
i
f
e
im
p
a
c
t
s
;
b
e
a
r
s
a
f
e
t
y
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
;
mu
l
e
d
e
e
r
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
;
a
n
d
ec
o
n
o
m
i
c
s
.
A1
2
C
h
u
c
k
B
r
a
t
l
a
n
d
10
3
9
7
H
a
s
t
i
n
g
s
H
t
s
.
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
1
Br
a
t
l
a
n
d
@
u
s
a
m
e
d
i
a
.
t
v
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
3
,
2
0
0
3
Re
q
u
e
s
t
s
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
E
d
i
n
b
u
r
g
h
Dr
i
v
e
a
c
c
e
s
s
p
o
i
n
t
b
e
g
a
t
e
d
a
n
d
lo
c
k
e
d
.
C
o
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
pr
o
p
e
r
t
y
v
a
l
u
e
s
.
4
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
R
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
E
I
R
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
a
n
y
on
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
n
t
h
e
T
o
w
n
o
f
T
r
u
c
k
e
e
f
r
o
m
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
0
3
t
o
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
1
CO
M
M
E
N
T
O
R
N
A
M
E
AN
D
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
Project Description
Aesthetics
Agriculture and Forestry
Air Quality
Biological Resources
Cultural Resources
Geology / Soils
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Hazards / Hazardous Materials
Hydrology / Water Quality
Land Use and Planning
Mineral Resources
Noise
Population / Housing
Public Services
Recreation
Transportation / Traffic
Utilities / Service Systems
Construction Impacts
Alternatives
Other
Requests to be Notified
SU
M
M
A
R
Y
O
F
CO
M
M
E
N
T
A1
3
J
o
h
n
B
l
a
c
k
10
1
1
8
W
i
l
t
s
h
i
r
e
L
a
n
e
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
1
Jb
6
0
1
@
s
b
c
g
l
o
b
a
l
.
n
e
t
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
7
,
2
0
0
3
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
o
f
l
i
f
e
;
tr
a
f
f
i
c
i
n
G
l
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
a
r
e
a
;
in
a
d
e
q
u
a
t
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
in
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
;
s
a
f
e
t
y
o
f
c
h
i
l
d
r
e
n
;
im
p
a
c
t
s
t
o
d
e
e
r
m
i
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
co
r
r
i
d
o
r
;
n
o
i
s
e
a
n
d
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
im
p
a
c
t
s
.
A1
4
C
i
n
d
y
H
a
s
t
i
n
g
s
sk
i
e
r
c
i
n
d
y
@
h
o
t
m
a
i
l
.
c
o
m
De
c
e
m
b
e
r
1
,
2
0
0
3
Re
q
u
e
s
t
s
a
n
e
w
E
I
R
.
C
o
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
ab
o
u
t
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
a
n
d
e
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
ev
a
c
u
a
t
i
o
n
.
A1
5
C
i
n
d
y
H
a
s
t
i
n
g
s
sk
i
e
r
c
i
n
d
y
@
h
o
t
m
a
i
l
.
c
o
m
De
c
e
m
b
e
r
1
,
2
0
0
3
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
c
l
a
r
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
f
r
o
m
pr
e
v
i
o
u
s
c
o
m
m
e
n
t
.
A1
6
C
i
n
d
y
B
a
n
s
e
n
De
c
e
m
b
e
r
9
,
2
0
0
3
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
l
o
s
s
o
f
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
la
n
d
f
o
r
p
u
b
l
i
c
u
s
e
.
A1
7
A
n
n
o
u
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
t
o
di
s
c
u
s
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
De
c
e
m
b
e
r
9
,
2
0
0
3
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
o
f
l
i
f
e
;
im
p
a
c
t
s
t
o
m
u
l
e
d
e
e
r
h
e
r
d
;
ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
;
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
;
ch
i
l
d
s
a
f
e
t
y
;
e
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
s
;
a
n
d
po
l
l
u
t
i
o
n
.
A1
8
R
i
c
k
M
a
d
d
a
l
e
n
a
PO
B
o
x
2
5
5
4
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
0
(O
x
f
o
r
d
C
i
r
c
l
e
)
De
c
e
m
b
e
r
1
6
,
2
0
0
3
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
;
pu
b
l
i
c
a
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
l
a
n
d
s
f
o
r
re
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
;
a
n
d
f
i
r
e
h
a
z
a
r
d
s
.
5
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
R
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
E
I
R
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
a
n
y
on
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
n
t
h
e
T
o
w
n
o
f
T
r
u
c
k
e
e
f
r
o
m
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
0
3
t
o
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
1
CO
M
M
E
N
T
O
R
N
A
M
E
AN
D
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
Project Description
Aesthetics
Agriculture and Forestry
Air Quality
Biological Resources
Cultural Resources
Geology / Soils
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Hazards / Hazardous Materials
Hydrology / Water Quality
Land Use and Planning
Mineral Resources
Noise
Population / Housing
Public Services
Recreation
Transportation / Traffic
Utilities / Service Systems
Construction Impacts
Alternatives
Other
Requests to be Notified
SU
M
M
A
R
Y
O
F
CO
M
M
E
N
T
A1
9
S
a
l
l
y
a
n
d
E
r
i
c
G
r
e
u
f
e
PO
B
o
x
1
0
6
1
4
16
4
8
5
G
l
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
D
r
i
v
e
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
1
Ko
n
a
s
n
o
w
4
3
0
1
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
m
De
c
e
m
b
e
r
1
8
,
2
0
0
3
Re
q
u
e
s
t
s
a
n
e
w
E
I
R
.
C
o
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
ab
o
u
t
e
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
e
v
a
c
u
a
t
i
o
n
;
co
s
t
o
f
u
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
;
u
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
in
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
;
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
de
n
s
i
t
y
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
;
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
v
a
l
u
e
s
;
an
d
s
c
h
o
o
l
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
.
A2
0
G
l
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
U
n
i
t
e
d
De
c
e
m
b
e
r
2
4
,
2
0
0
3
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
zo
n
i
n
g
;
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
;
ec
o
n
o
m
i
c
s
;
s
c
h
o
o
l
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
:
c
o
s
t
of
i
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
;
a
n
d
d
e
e
r
im
p
a
c
t
s
.
R
e
q
u
e
s
t
s
a
n
E
I
R
b
e
pr
e
p
a
r
e
d
.
A2
1
P
a
t
r
i
c
e
D
a
v
i
s
o
n
10
0
1
2
C
h
e
l
s
e
a
p
l
a
c
e
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
1
Ja
n
u
a
r
y
2
2
,
2
0
0
4
Of
f
e
r
s
i
n
p
u
t
o
n
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
c
u
l
t
u
r
a
l
re
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
o
n
s
i
t
e
a
n
d
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
s
cu
l
t
u
r
a
l
r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
b
e
a
n
a
l
y
z
e
d
i
n
th
e
E
I
R
.
A2
2
G
e
o
f
f
S
u
l
l
i
v
a
n
S
t
e
p
h
e
n
s
Gl
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
D
e
v
o
n
s
h
i
r
e
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
i
o
n
15
7
2
6
G
l
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
D
r
i
v
e
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
1
Fe
b
r
u
a
r
y
3
,
2
0
0
4
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
m
a
n
n
e
r
i
n
wh
i
c
h
R
e
q
u
e
s
t
f
o
r
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
w
a
s
wo
r
d
e
d
.
R
e
q
u
e
s
t
s
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
a
n
d
ne
w
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
c
o
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
.
A2
3
S
a
n
d
r
a
L
.
K
o
r
t
h
17
1
6
4
V
a
l
l
e
y
V
i
e
w
R
o
a
d
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
1
Fe
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
,
2
0
0
4
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
h
a
z
a
r
d
s
.
Re
q
u
e
s
t
s
t
o
b
e
a
d
d
e
d
t
o
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
in
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
n
o
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
di
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
l
i
s
t
.
6
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
R
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
E
I
R
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
a
n
y
on
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
n
t
h
e
T
o
w
n
o
f
T
r
u
c
k
e
e
f
r
o
m
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
0
3
t
o
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
1
CO
M
M
E
N
T
O
R
N
A
M
E
AN
D
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
Project Description
Aesthetics
Agriculture and Forestry
Air Quality
Biological Resources
Cultural Resources
Geology / Soils
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Hazards / Hazardous Materials
Hydrology / Water Quality
Land Use and Planning
Mineral Resources
Noise
Population / Housing
Public Services
Recreation
Transportation / Traffic
Utilities / Service Systems
Construction Impacts
Alternatives
Other
Requests to be Notified
SU
M
M
A
R
Y
O
F
CO
M
M
E
N
T
A2
4
N
o
N
a
m
e
No
D
a
t
e
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
E
d
i
n
b
u
r
g
h
Dr
i
v
e
a
s
e
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
a
c
c
e
s
s
po
i
n
t
;
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
t
o
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
pr
o
j
e
c
t
;
r
e
d
u
c
e
d
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
;
r
o
a
d
w
a
y
h
a
z
a
r
d
s
;
wi
n
t
e
r
r
o
a
d
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
;
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
an
d
p
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
;
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
im
p
a
c
t
s
;
p
u
b
l
i
c
a
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
p
r
i
v
a
t
e
la
n
d
;
o
p
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
a
n
d
t
r
a
i
l
s
;
qu
a
l
i
t
y
o
f
l
i
f
e
.
A2
5
B
o
b
a
n
d
B
e
t
h
C
u
s
h
m
a
n
sq
u
a
w
@
t
e
l
i
s
.
o
r
g
Ju
n
e
8
,
2
0
0
4
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
a
n
d
ch
i
l
d
s
a
f
e
t
y
;
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
i
n
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
;
an
d
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
o
f
l
i
f
e
.
A2
6
J
a
n
e
t
S
i
l
v
e
r
17
0
8
6
G
l
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
D
r
i
v
e
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
1
Ju
n
e
8
,
2
0
0
4
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
in
t
h
e
G
l
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
a
r
e
a
;
w
i
n
t
e
r
ro
a
d
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
;
t
w
o
a
c
c
e
s
s
po
i
n
t
s
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
e
d
;
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
o
f
l
i
f
e
;
al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
a
r
e
s
u
g
g
e
s
t
e
d
;
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
an
d
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
n
o
i
s
e
;
a
n
d
in
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
;
A2
7
A
r
j
e
n
K
u
y
p
e
r
16
0
6
8
W
o
o
d
b
r
i
d
g
e
C
o
u
r
t
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
1
Ju
n
e
1
4
,
2
0
0
4
Re
q
u
e
s
t
a
z
o
n
i
n
g
m
a
p
am
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
;
h
y
d
r
o
l
o
g
y
a
n
d
wa
t
e
r
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
;
w
i
l
d
l
i
f
e
m
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
an
d
r
i
p
a
r
i
a
n
h
a
b
i
t
a
t
;
a
n
d
d
a
m
a
g
e
na
t
u
r
a
l
a
p
p
e
a
r
a
n
c
e
o
f
h
i
l
l
s
i
d
e
s
.
7
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
R
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
E
I
R
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
a
n
y
on
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
n
t
h
e
T
o
w
n
o
f
T
r
u
c
k
e
e
f
r
o
m
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
0
3
t
o
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
1
CO
M
M
E
N
T
O
R
N
A
M
E
AN
D
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
Project Description
Aesthetics
Agriculture and Forestry
Air Quality
Biological Resources
Cultural Resources
Geology / Soils
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Hazards / Hazardous Materials
Hydrology / Water Quality
Land Use and Planning
Mineral Resources
Noise
Population / Housing
Public Services
Recreation
Transportation / Traffic
Utilities / Service Systems
Construction Impacts
Alternatives
Other
Requests to be Notified
SU
M
M
A
R
Y
O
F
CO
M
M
E
N
T
A2
8
G
l
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
U
n
i
t
e
d
Ju
n
e
2
1
,
2
0
0
4
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
zo
n
i
n
g
;
d
e
e
r
m
i
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
;
tr
a
f
f
i
c
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
;
g
r
o
w
t
h
i
n
d
u
c
i
n
g
im
p
a
c
t
s
;
c
u
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
;
ec
o
n
o
m
i
c
s
;
c
o
s
t
o
f
in
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
;
a
f
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
ho
u
s
i
n
g
;
b
i
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
;
em
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
a
n
d
f
i
r
e
pr
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
A2
9
A
d
r
i
a
n
J
u
n
c
o
s
a
16
1
7
3
L
a
n
c
a
s
t
e
r
P
l
a
c
e
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
1
aj
u
n
c
o
s
a
@
e
a
r
t
h
l
i
n
k
.
n
e
t
Ju
l
y
8
,
2
0
0
4
Re
p
o
r
t
s
o
p
i
n
i
o
n
o
n
s
t
a
t
u
s
o
f
Wi
l
d
B
u
c
k
w
h
e
a
t
s
(
E
r
i
o
g
o
n
u
m
)
an
d
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
i
m
p
o
r
t
a
n
c
e
u
n
d
e
r
CE
Q
A
.
B.
L
e
t
t
e
r
s
R
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
I
n
R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
o
f
T
h
e
C
a
n
y
o
n
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
F
r
o
m
M
a
r
c
h
2
0
0
5
t
o
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
2
0
0
6
Pr
i
v
a
t
e
I
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
s
a
n
d
O
r
g
a
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
s
B1
N
o
N
a
m
e
No
D
a
t
e
Su
g
g
e
s
t
s
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
t
o
t
h
e
pr
o
j
e
c
t
.
B2
D
a
v
e
D
o
n
n
e
l
l
y
10
3
8
5
R
e
g
e
n
c
y
C
i
r
c
l
e
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
1
dd
o
n
n
e
l
l
y
@
k
w
.
c
o
m
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
;
n
o
i
s
e
;
al
t
e
r
n
a
t
e
a
c
c
e
s
s
;
a
n
d
s
a
f
e
t
y
.
B3
B
r
i
a
n
O
l
s
o
n
13
6
0
G
r
a
c
e
D
r
i
v
e
Ea
g
a
n
,
M
N
5
5
1
2
3
Bo
l
s
o
n
1
0
@
m
n
.
r
r
.
c
o
m
Ma
r
c
h
1
7
,
2
0
0
5
No
t
i
f
i
e
s
h
e
i
s
m
o
v
i
n
g
a
n
d
re
q
u
e
s
t
s
f
u
t
u
r
e
n
o
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
b
e
ma
i
l
e
d
t
o
n
e
w
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
.
8
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
R
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
E
I
R
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
a
n
y
on
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
n
t
h
e
T
o
w
n
o
f
T
r
u
c
k
e
e
f
r
o
m
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
0
3
t
o
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
1
CO
M
M
E
N
T
O
R
N
A
M
E
AN
D
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
Project Description
Aesthetics
Agriculture and Forestry
Air Quality
Biological Resources
Cultural Resources
Geology / Soils
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Hazards / Hazardous Materials
Hydrology / Water Quality
Land Use and Planning
Mineral Resources
Noise
Population / Housing
Public Services
Recreation
Transportation / Traffic
Utilities / Service Systems
Construction Impacts
Alternatives
Other
Requests to be Notified
SU
M
M
A
R
Y
O
F
CO
M
M
E
N
T
B4
M
a
r
t
h
a
F
r
a
n
t
z
mn
p
a
n
t
z
@
a
t
t
.
n
e
t
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
4
,
2
0
0
5
Re
q
u
e
s
t
s
t
o
b
e
a
d
d
e
d
t
o
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
in
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
n
o
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
di
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
l
i
s
t
.
B5
B
r
i
n
n
W
e
l
l
i
s
e
10
0
7
5
W
e
s
t
R
i
v
e
r
S
t
,
S
t
e
2
0
6
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
1
br
i
n
n
@
s
w
i
t
c
h
b
a
c
k
p
r
.
c
o
m
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
1
8
,
2
0
0
5
Re
q
u
e
s
t
s
t
o
b
e
a
d
d
e
d
t
o
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
in
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
n
o
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
di
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
l
i
s
t
.
B6
J
a
n
e
t
S
i
l
v
e
r
40
2
0
0
T
r
u
c
k
e
e
A
i
r
p
o
r
t
R
o
a
d
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
1
si
l
v
e
r
@
p
o
r
t
e
r
s
i
m
o
n
.
c
o
m
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
1
5
,
2
0
0
5
Re
q
u
e
s
t
s
t
o
b
e
a
d
d
e
d
t
o
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
in
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
n
o
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
di
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
l
i
s
t
.
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
a
t
Wh
i
t
e
h
o
r
s
e
/
G
l
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
/
M
a
r
t
i
s
Pe
a
k
R
o
a
d
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
B7
K
e
v
i
n
R
o
m
e
r
o
16
7
0
3
G
l
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
D
r
i
v
e
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
1
kr
o
m
e
r
o
@
r
e
m
s
a
-
c
f
.
c
o
m
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
1
5
,
2
0
0
5
Re
q
u
e
s
t
s
t
o
b
e
a
d
d
e
d
t
o
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
in
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
n
o
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
di
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
l
i
s
t
.
B8
K
a
r
e
n
H
u
t
t
o
n
PO
B
o
x
8
7
2
1
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
2
Ja
n
u
a
r
y
1
6
,
2
0
0
6
Re
q
u
e
s
t
s
t
o
b
e
a
d
d
e
d
t
o
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
in
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
n
o
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
di
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
l
i
s
t
.
9
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
R
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
E
I
R
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
a
n
y
on
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
n
t
h
e
T
o
w
n
o
f
T
r
u
c
k
e
e
f
r
o
m
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
0
3
t
o
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
1
CO
M
M
E
N
T
O
R
N
A
M
E
AN
D
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
Project Description
Aesthetics
Agriculture and Forestry
Air Quality
Biological Resources
Cultural Resources
Geology / Soils
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Hazards / Hazardous Materials
Hydrology / Water Quality
Land Use and Planning
Mineral Resources
Noise
Population / Housing
Public Services
Recreation
Transportation / Traffic
Utilities / Service Systems
Construction Impacts
Alternatives
Other
Requests to be Notified
SU
M
M
A
R
Y
O
F
CO
M
M
E
N
T
C.
L
e
t
t
e
r
s
R
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
I
n
R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
T
o
Th
e
N
o
t
i
c
e
o
f
P
r
e
p
a
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
T
h
e
C
a
n
yo
n
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
E
I
R
D
a
t
e
d
M
a
r
c
h
1
8
,
2
0
0
6
Pr
i
v
a
t
e
I
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
s
a
n
d
O
r
g
a
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
s
C1
A
d
r
i
a
n
J
u
n
c
o
s
a
16
1
7
3
L
a
n
c
a
s
t
e
r
P
l
a
c
e
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
1
aj
u
n
c
o
s
a
@
e
a
r
t
h
l
i
n
k
.
n
e
t
Ap
r
i
l
5
,
2
0
0
6
Re
q
u
e
s
t
s
t
o
b
e
a
d
d
e
d
t
o
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
in
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
n
o
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
di
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
l
i
s
t
.
C
o
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
ab
o
u
t
w
e
t
l
a
n
d
d
e
l
i
n
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
im
p
a
c
t
s
;
d
e
e
r
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
t
u
d
i
e
s
;
pe
b
b
l
e
m
e
a
d
o
w
s
a
n
d
s
n
a
g
s
a
r
e
co
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
;
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
a
n
d
st
u
d
i
e
d
a
t
r
e
l
e
v
a
n
t
t
i
m
e
s
;
co
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
s
e
c
o
n
d
u
n
i
t
s
;
de
n
s
i
t
y
;
i
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
;
an
d
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
s
c
h
a
n
g
e
s
i
n
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
an
d
h
a
b
i
t
s
b
e
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
.
In
c
l
u
d
e
s
m
a
p
o
f
s
i
t
e
a
r
e
a
a
n
d
re
q
u
e
s
t
s
a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
o
f
.
C2
M
a
r
t
y
a
n
d
N
e
i
l
P
a
n
t
z
mn
p
a
n
t
z
@
a
t
t
.
n
e
t
Ap
r
i
l
1
7
,
2
0
0
6
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
o
f
l
i
f
e
;
tr
a
f
f
i
c
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
;
a
n
d
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
an
d
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
s
a
f
e
t
y
.
10
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
R
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
E
I
R
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
a
n
y
on
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
n
t
h
e
T
o
w
n
o
f
T
r
u
c
k
e
e
f
r
o
m
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
0
3
t
o
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
1
CO
M
M
E
N
T
O
R
N
A
M
E
AN
D
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
Project Description
Aesthetics
Agriculture and Forestry
Air Quality
Biological Resources
Cultural Resources
Geology / Soils
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Hazards / Hazardous Materials
Hydrology / Water Quality
Land Use and Planning
Mineral Resources
Noise
Population / Housing
Public Services
Recreation
Transportation / Traffic
Utilities / Service Systems
Construction Impacts
Alternatives
Other
Requests to be Notified
SU
M
M
A
R
Y
O
F
CO
M
M
E
N
T
C3
L
e
i
g
h
G
o
l
d
e
n
Ap
r
i
l
2
6
,
2
0
0
6
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
;
qu
a
l
i
t
y
o
f
l
i
f
e
;
a
n
d
e
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
s
.
In
c
l
u
d
e
s
a
n
a
t
t
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
an
n
o
u
n
c
e
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
a
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
o
n
th
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
,
w
h
i
c
h
d
e
s
c
r
i
b
e
s
co
n
c
e
r
n
s
a
b
o
u
t
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
o
f
l
i
f
e
;
im
p
a
c
t
s
t
o
m
u
l
e
d
e
e
r
h
e
r
d
;
ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
;
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
;
ch
i
l
d
s
a
f
e
t
y
;
e
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
s
;
a
n
d
po
l
l
u
t
i
o
n
.
C4
R
i
c
k
S
e
e
g
m
i
l
l
e
r
rk
s
r
a
r
@
a
o
l
.
c
o
m
11
7
1
6
W
h
i
t
e
h
o
r
s
e
R
o
a
d
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
1
Ma
y
2
,
2
0
0
6
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
s
a
f
e
t
y
a
t
Ma
r
t
i
s
P
e
a
k
R
o
a
d
a
c
c
e
s
s
p
o
i
n
t
;
us
e
o
f
o
l
d
d
a
t
a
i
n
n
e
w
E
I
R
;
a
n
d
ge
n
e
r
a
l
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
s
a
f
e
t
y
i
n
G
l
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
ar
e
a
.
D.
L
e
t
t
e
r
s
R
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
I
n
R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
T
o
T
h
e
N
o
t
i
c
e
O
f
A
v
a
i
l
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
o
f
t
h
e
C
a
n
y
o
n
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
E
I
R
D
a
t
e
d
A
p
r
i
l
2
4
,
2
0
0
7
Pu
b
l
i
c
A
g
e
n
c
i
e
s
/
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
r
s
D1
A
T
&
T
Ca
r
o
l
A
.
P
r
i
n
c
e
Pu
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
M
a
n
a
g
e
r
12
8
2
4
E
a
r
h
a
r
t
A
v
e
n
u
e
Au
b
u
r
n
,
C
A
9
5
6
0
2
Ma
y
1
1
,
2
0
0
7
Ac
k
n
o
w
l
e
d
g
e
s
A
T
&
T
h
a
s
re
v
i
e
w
e
d
t
h
e
D
E
I
R
a
n
d
l
o
o
k
s
fo
r
w
a
r
d
t
o
s
e
r
v
i
n
g
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
.
11
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
R
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
E
I
R
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
a
n
y
on
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
n
t
h
e
T
o
w
n
o
f
T
r
u
c
k
e
e
f
r
o
m
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
0
3
t
o
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
1
CO
M
M
E
N
T
O
R
N
A
M
E
AN
D
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
Project Description
Aesthetics
Agriculture and Forestry
Air Quality
Biological Resources
Cultural Resources
Geology / Soils
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Hazards / Hazardous Materials
Hydrology / Water Quality
Land Use and Planning
Mineral Resources
Noise
Population / Housing
Public Services
Recreation
Transportation / Traffic
Utilities / Service Systems
Construction Impacts
Alternatives
Other
Requests to be Notified
SU
M
M
A
R
Y
O
F
CO
M
M
E
N
T
D2
J
o
h
n
W
.
R
u
m
s
e
y
Se
n
i
o
r
C
i
v
i
l
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
Co
u
n
t
y
o
f
N
e
v
a
d
a
De
p
t
o
f
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
95
0
M
a
i
d
u
A
v
e
n
u
e
Ne
v
a
d
a
C
i
t
y
,
C
A
9
5
9
5
9
Ma
y
1
8
,
2
0
0
7
Be
l
i
e
v
e
s
t
h
e
C
o
u
n
t
y
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
o
f
Gl
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
D
r
i
v
e
h
a
s
n
o
t
b
e
e
n
ad
e
q
u
a
t
e
l
y
m
i
t
i
g
a
t
e
d
t
o
r
e
d
u
c
e
tr
a
f
f
i
c
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
.
S
u
g
g
e
s
t
s
mi
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
t
o
w
i
d
e
n
G
l
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
Dr
i
v
e
a
n
d
a
l
l
o
w
f
o
r
C
l
a
s
s
2
b
i
k
e
la
n
e
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
.
D3
B
r
a
d
H
a
r
r
i
s
,
U
n
i
t
C
h
i
e
f
Je
f
f
D
o
w
l
i
n
g
,
T
r
u
c
k
e
e
A
r
e
a
Fo
r
e
s
t
e
r
De
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
o
f
F
o
r
e
s
t
r
y
a
n
d
Fi
r
e
P
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
Ne
v
a
d
a
-
Y
u
b
a
-
P
l
a
c
e
r
U
n
i
t
Au
b
u
r
n
,
C
A
9
5
6
0
3
Ma
y
2
9
,
2
0
0
7
Ac
k
n
o
w
l
e
d
g
e
s
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
re
q
u
i
r
e
a
n
e
x
e
m
p
t
i
o
n
f
r
o
m
Ti
m
b
e
r
l
a
n
d
C
o
n
v
e
r
s
i
o
n
f
o
r
Su
b
d
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
a
n
d
T
i
m
b
e
r
H
a
r
v
e
s
t
Pl
a
n
.
D4
N
i
c
k
D
e
a
l
,
A
c
t
i
n
g
C
h
i
e
f
Of
f
i
c
e
o
f
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
,
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
De
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
o
f
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
70
3
B
S
t
r
e
e
t
PO
B
o
x
9
1
1
Ma
r
y
s
v
i
l
l
e
,
C
A
9
5
9
0
1
Ju
n
e
6
,
2
0
0
7
St
a
t
e
s
n
o
s
i
g
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
t
o
St
a
t
e
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
s
a
r
e
e
x
p
e
c
t
e
d
;
tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
f
e
e
s
a
r
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
;
cu
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
t
o
C
a
l
t
r
a
n
s
dr
a
i
n
a
g
e
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
m
i
n
i
m
i
z
e
d
;
no
n
e
t
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
t
o
1
0
0
-
y
e
a
r
st
o
r
m
e
v
e
n
t
p
e
a
k
d
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e
m
a
y
be
r
e
a
l
i
z
e
d
w
i
t
h
i
n
S
t
a
t
e
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
ri
g
h
t
-
o
f
-
w
a
y
;
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
m
u
s
t
m
e
e
t
RW
Q
C
B
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
;
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
s
re
v
i
e
w
o
f
d
e
t
a
i
l
e
d
d
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
pl
a
n
s
;
a
n
d
E
n
c
r
o
a
c
h
m
e
n
t
P
e
r
m
i
t
is
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
.
12
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
R
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
E
I
R
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
a
n
y
on
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
n
t
h
e
T
o
w
n
o
f
T
r
u
c
k
e
e
f
r
o
m
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
0
3
t
o
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
1
CO
M
M
E
N
T
O
R
N
A
M
E
AN
D
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
Project Description
Aesthetics
Agriculture and Forestry
Air Quality
Biological Resources
Cultural Resources
Geology / Soils
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Hazards / Hazardous Materials
Hydrology / Water Quality
Land Use and Planning
Mineral Resources
Noise
Population / Housing
Public Services
Recreation
Transportation / Traffic
Utilities / Service Systems
Construction Impacts
Alternatives
Other
Requests to be Notified
SU
M
M
A
R
Y
O
F
CO
M
M
E
N
T
D5
G
r
e
t
c
h
e
n
B
e
n
n
i
t
t
,
A
i
r
P
o
l
l
u
t
i
o
n
Co
n
t
r
o
l
O
f
f
i
c
e
r
No
r
t
h
e
r
n
S
i
e
r
r
a
A
i
r
Q
u
a
l
i
t
y
Ma
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
13
4
5
0
D
o
n
n
e
r
P
a
s
s
R
d
,
S
t
e
B
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
1
Ju
n
e
7
,
2
0
0
7
Ac
k
n
o
w
l
e
d
g
e
s
h
a
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
e
d
t
h
e
pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
pr
o
j
e
c
t
a
n
d
s
u
g
g
e
s
t
s
p
o
s
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
fo
r
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
t
o
r
e
d
u
c
e
em
i
s
s
i
o
n
s
f
r
o
m
o
t
h
e
r
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
ou
t
s
i
d
e
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
t
o
f
u
r
t
h
e
r
re
d
u
c
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
.
D6
T
e
r
r
y
R
o
b
e
r
t
s
Se
n
i
o
r
P
l
a
n
n
e
r
OP
R
–
S
t
a
t
e
C
l
e
a
r
i
n
g
h
o
u
s
e
14
0
0
1
0
th
St
r
e
e
t
PO
B
o
x
3
0
4
4
Sa
c
r
a
m
e
n
t
o
,
C
A
9
5
8
1
2
Ju
n
e
8
,
2
0
0
7
Ac
k
n
o
w
l
e
d
g
e
s
L
e
a
d
A
g
e
n
c
y
h
a
s
co
m
p
l
i
e
d
w
i
t
h
C
E
Q
A
f
o
r
r
e
v
i
e
w
re
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
o
f
t
h
e
D
E
I
R
.
D7
A
l
a
n
M
i
l
l
e
r
,
P
.
E
.
,
C
h
i
e
f
,
N
o
r
t
h
Ba
s
i
n
R
e
g
u
l
a
t
o
r
y
U
n
i
t
Ca
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
W
a
t
e
r
Qu
a
l
i
t
y
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
B
o
a
r
d
La
h
o
n
t
a
n
R
e
g
i
o
n
25
0
1
L
a
k
e
T
a
h
o
e
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
So
u
t
h
L
a
k
e
T
a
h
o
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
5
0
Ju
n
e
1
2
,
2
0
0
7
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
s
n
o
w
m
e
l
t
a
n
d
s
n
o
w
st
o
r
a
g
e
n
o
t
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
e
d
;
n
o
t
e
s
po
s
s
i
b
l
e
t
y
p
o
i
n
1
0
-
y
e
a
r
f
l
o
o
d
ev
e
n
t
d
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
;
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
s
s
i
t
e
pl
a
n
s
f
o
r
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
to
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
;
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
fe
a
t
u
r
e
l
e
g
e
n
d
s
b
e
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
.
D8
T
e
r
r
y
R
o
b
e
r
t
s
Se
n
i
o
r
P
l
a
n
n
e
r
OP
R
–
S
t
a
t
e
C
l
e
a
r
i
n
g
h
o
u
s
e
14
0
0
1
0
th
St
r
e
e
t
o
r
P
O
B
o
x
30
4
4
Sa
c
r
a
m
e
n
t
o
,
C
A
9
5
8
1
2
Ju
n
e
1
3
,
2
0
0
7
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
c
o
p
i
e
s
o
f
l
e
t
t
e
r
s
re
c
e
i
v
e
d
a
f
t
e
r
t
h
e
J
u
n
e
7
,
2
0
1
0
co
m
m
e
n
t
p
e
r
i
o
d
c
l
o
s
e
d
.
En
c
o
u
r
a
g
e
s
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
a
l
t
h
o
u
g
h
no
t
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
u
n
d
e
r
C
E
Q
A
.
13
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
R
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
E
I
R
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
a
n
y
on
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
n
t
h
e
T
o
w
n
o
f
T
r
u
c
k
e
e
f
r
o
m
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
0
3
t
o
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
1
CO
M
M
E
N
T
O
R
N
A
M
E
AN
D
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
Project Description
Aesthetics
Agriculture and Forestry
Air Quality
Biological Resources
Cultural Resources
Geology / Soils
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Hazards / Hazardous Materials
Hydrology / Water Quality
Land Use and Planning
Mineral Resources
Noise
Population / Housing
Public Services
Recreation
Transportation / Traffic
Utilities / Service Systems
Construction Impacts
Alternatives
Other
Requests to be Notified
SU
M
M
A
R
Y
O
F
CO
M
M
E
N
T
D9
K
a
t
y
S
a
n
c
h
e
z
Na
t
i
v
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n
H
e
r
i
t
a
g
e
Co
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
91
5
C
a
p
i
t
o
l
M
a
l
l
R
o
o
m
3
6
4
Sa
c
r
a
m
e
n
t
o
,
C
A
9
5
8
1
4
Ju
n
e
2
7
,
2
0
0
7
In
c
l
u
d
e
s
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
co
n
d
u
c
t
a
r
e
c
o
r
d
s
s
e
a
r
c
h
a
n
d
ot
h
e
r
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
r
e
s
e
a
r
c
h
t
h
a
t
ma
y
b
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
.
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
l
i
s
t
of
N
a
t
i
v
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n
c
o
n
t
a
c
t
s
.
Pr
i
v
a
t
e
I
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
s
a
n
d
O
r
g
a
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
s
D1
0
T
o
m
M
e
a
d
o
w
s
Ap
r
i
l
2
4
,
2
0
0
7
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
a
n
d
sa
f
e
t
y
i
n
G
l
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
a
r
e
a
(
M
a
r
t
i
s
Pe
a
k
R
o
a
d
a
n
d
E
d
i
n
b
u
r
g
h
Dr
i
v
e
)
;
s
u
g
g
e
s
t
s
a
t
h
i
r
d
a
c
c
e
s
s
po
i
n
t
b
e
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
.
D1
1
D
a
v
e
G
u
i
r
a
g
o
s
s
i
a
n
Ma
y
2
0
0
7
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
h
o
m
e
v
a
l
u
e
;
tr
a
f
f
i
c
a
n
d
s
a
f
e
t
y
o
f
c
h
i
l
d
r
e
n
.
D1
2
J
o
h
n
B
l
a
c
k
10
1
1
8
W
i
l
t
s
h
i
r
e
L
a
n
e
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
1
Jb
6
0
1
@
s
b
c
g
l
o
b
a
l
.
n
e
t
Ma
y
1
,
2
0
0
7
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
i
n
Gl
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
a
r
e
a
,
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
t
o
d
e
e
r
mi
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
,
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
wo
r
k
f
o
r
c
e
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
,
l
o
s
s
o
f
o
p
e
n
sp
a
c
e
a
n
d
t
r
a
i
l
s
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
o
f
p
u
b
l
i
c
p
a
r
k
s
.
14
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
R
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
E
I
R
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
a
n
y
on
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
n
t
h
e
T
o
w
n
o
f
T
r
u
c
k
e
e
f
r
o
m
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
0
3
t
o
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
1
CO
M
M
E
N
T
O
R
N
A
M
E
AN
D
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
Project Description
Aesthetics
Agriculture and Forestry
Air Quality
Biological Resources
Cultural Resources
Geology / Soils
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Hazards / Hazardous Materials
Hydrology / Water Quality
Land Use and Planning
Mineral Resources
Noise
Population / Housing
Public Services
Recreation
Transportation / Traffic
Utilities / Service Systems
Construction Impacts
Alternatives
Other
Requests to be Notified
SU
M
M
A
R
Y
O
F
CO
M
M
E
N
T
D1
3
C
h
u
c
k
B
r
a
t
l
a
n
d
10
3
9
7
H
a
s
t
i
n
g
s
H
t
s
.
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
1
Br
a
t
l
a
n
d
@
u
s
a
m
e
d
i
a
.
t
v
Ma
y
2
,
2
0
0
7
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
a
n
d
sa
f
e
t
y
i
n
G
l
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
a
r
e
a
;
de
g
r
a
d
a
t
i
o
n
t
o
s
u
r
r
o
u
n
d
i
n
g
ro
a
d
w
a
y
s
;
e
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
s
;
c
o
s
t
o
f
pu
b
l
i
c
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
;
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
;
qu
e
s
t
i
o
n
s
a
c
c
e
s
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
b
y
p
u
b
l
i
c
to
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
o
p
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
.
Re
q
u
e
s
t
s
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
E
d
i
n
b
u
r
g
h
Dr
i
v
e
a
c
c
e
s
s
p
o
i
n
t
b
e
g
a
t
e
d
a
n
d
lo
c
k
e
d
.
D1
4
D
a
v
e
S
a
l
t
e
n
b
e
r
g
e
r
10
5
6
6
B
e
l
f
o
r
d
P
l
a
c
e
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
1
Ma
y
1
8
,
2
0
0
7
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
a
n
d
sa
f
e
t
y
i
n
G
l
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
a
r
e
a
(
M
a
r
t
i
s
Pe
a
k
R
o
a
d
a
n
d
E
d
i
n
b
u
r
g
h
Dr
i
v
e
)
;
s
u
g
g
e
s
t
s
a
t
h
i
r
d
a
c
c
e
s
s
po
i
n
t
b
e
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
.
D1
5
D
i
c
k
a
n
d
H
e
l
g
a
M
u
n
d
a
y
10
3
9
0
M
a
n
c
h
e
s
t
e
r
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
1
Ma
y
2
1
,
2
0
0
7
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
tr
a
f
f
i
c
m
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
.
D1
6
E
r
i
c
,
S
a
l
l
y
a
n
d
K
o
n
a
G
r
e
u
f
e
PO
B
o
x
1
0
6
1
4
16
4
8
5
G
l
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
D
r
i
v
e
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
1
Ko
n
a
s
n
o
w
4
3
0
1
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
m
Ma
y
2
1
,
2
0
0
7
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
tr
a
f
f
i
c
t
o
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
r
o
a
d
s
;
a
c
c
e
s
s
to
C
a
n
y
o
n
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
a
r
e
a
;
ap
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
o
l
d
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
;
an
d
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
o
f
l
a
r
g
e
e
v
e
n
t
a
t
Gl
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
.
15
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
R
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
E
I
R
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
a
n
y
on
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
n
t
h
e
T
o
w
n
o
f
T
r
u
c
k
e
e
f
r
o
m
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
0
3
t
o
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
1
CO
M
M
E
N
T
O
R
N
A
M
E
AN
D
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
Project Description
Aesthetics
Agriculture and Forestry
Air Quality
Biological Resources
Cultural Resources
Geology / Soils
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Hazards / Hazardous Materials
Hydrology / Water Quality
Land Use and Planning
Mineral Resources
Noise
Population / Housing
Public Services
Recreation
Transportation / Traffic
Utilities / Service Systems
Construction Impacts
Alternatives
Other
Requests to be Notified
SU
M
M
A
R
Y
O
F
CO
M
M
E
N
T
D1
7
C
o
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
G
l
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
&
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
s
Ma
y
2
1
,
2
0
0
7
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
r
e
v
i
e
w
u
n
d
e
r
1
9
9
6
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
i
s
o
u
t
o
f
d
a
t
e
;
re
q
u
e
s
t
s
r
e
v
i
e
w
u
n
d
e
r
2
0
2
5
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
;
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
;
re
q
u
e
s
t
s
p
a
r
c
e
l
b
e
r
e
z
o
n
e
d
.
Qu
a
l
i
t
y
o
f
l
i
f
e
.
Pe
t
i
t
i
o
n
#
1
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
i
n
g
r
e
v
i
e
w
un
d
e
r
2
0
2
5
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
.
Pe
t
i
t
i
o
n
#
2
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
i
n
g
t
h
a
t
re
d
u
c
e
d
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
b
e
an
a
l
y
z
e
d
;
c
o
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
r
e
d
u
c
e
d
de
n
s
i
t
y
a
n
a
l
y
z
e
d
i
n
D
E
I
R
i
s
n
o
t
ad
e
q
u
a
t
e
.
D1
8
L
o
r
i
K
e
l
l
y
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
G
l
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
&
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
s
Ma
y
2
2
,
2
0
0
7
Co
v
e
r
l
e
t
t
e
r
f
o
r
s
u
b
m
i
t
t
i
n
g
t
w
o
si
g
n
e
d
p
e
t
i
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
J
u
d
y
P
r
i
c
e
,
To
w
n
o
f
T
r
u
c
k
e
e
T
o
w
n
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
an
d
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
.
16
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
R
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
E
I
R
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
a
n
y
on
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
n
t
h
e
T
o
w
n
o
f
T
r
u
c
k
e
e
f
r
o
m
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
0
3
t
o
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
1
CO
M
M
E
N
T
O
R
N
A
M
E
AN
D
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
Project Description
Aesthetics
Agriculture and Forestry
Air Quality
Biological Resources
Cultural Resources
Geology / Soils
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Hazards / Hazardous Materials
Hydrology / Water Quality
Land Use and Planning
Mineral Resources
Noise
Population / Housing
Public Services
Recreation
Transportation / Traffic
Utilities / Service Systems
Construction Impacts
Alternatives
Other
Requests to be Notified
SU
M
M
A
R
Y
O
F
CO
M
M
E
N
T
D1
9
K
r
i
s
t
i
T
h
o
m
p
s
o
n
10
4
8
0
R
e
g
e
n
c
y
C
i
r
c
l
e
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
1
Ma
y
2
2
,
2
0
0
7
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
D
E
I
R
d
i
d
n
o
t
an
a
l
y
z
e
t
h
e
C
o
u
r
t
e
n
a
y
/
S
o
m
e
r
s
e
t
an
d
G
l
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
D
r
i
v
e
/
O
l
y
m
p
i
c
He
i
g
h
t
s
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
;
t
h
e
r
o
a
d
se
g
m
e
n
t
o
f
S
o
m
e
r
s
e
t
a
n
d
M
a
r
t
i
s
Pe
a
k
R
o
a
d
;
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
in
a
r
e
a
a
r
e
i
n
a
d
e
q
u
a
t
e
;
c
o
n
f
l
i
c
t
s
wi
t
h
1
9
9
6
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
L
O
S
po
l
i
c
i
e
s
;
s
c
h
o
o
l
t
i
m
e
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
im
p
a
c
t
s
n
o
t
s
t
u
d
i
e
d
;
s
c
h
o
o
l
b
u
s
ro
u
t
e
s
n
o
t
s
t
u
d
i
e
d
;
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
/
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
n
o
t
st
u
d
i
e
d
;
f
u
t
u
r
e
r
o
a
d
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
u
n
k
n
o
w
n
;
re
q
u
e
s
t
s
f
u
r
t
h
e
r
w
o
r
k
b
e
d
o
n
e
in
t
h
e
D
E
I
R
D2
0
N
i
k
k
i
R
i
l
e
y
15
9
0
3
W
i
n
d
s
o
r
W
a
y
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
1
Ma
y
2
2
,
2
0
0
7
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
d
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
do
e
s
n
o
t
a
d
e
q
u
a
t
e
l
y
d
e
s
c
r
i
b
e
st
e
e
p
s
l
o
p
e
s
;
v
i
s
u
a
l
r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
no
t
a
d
e
q
u
a
t
e
l
y
d
e
s
c
r
i
b
e
d
re
g
a
r
d
i
n
g
o
p
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
,
t
r
e
e
-
l
i
n
e
,
na
t
u
r
a
l
a
r
e
a
;
b
i
o
l
o
g
i
c
a
l
r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
do
n
o
t
a
c
k
n
o
w
l
e
d
g
e
o
w
l
s
o
n
si
t
e
;
e
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
s
;
c
o
r
r
e
c
t
ap
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
a
f
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
re
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
;
w
a
t
e
r
d
e
m
a
n
d
an
a
l
y
s
i
s
o
u
t
o
f
d
a
t
e
;
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
s
a
f
e
t
y
in
G
l
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
a
r
e
a
.
17
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
R
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
E
I
R
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
a
n
y
on
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
n
t
h
e
T
o
w
n
o
f
T
r
u
c
k
e
e
f
r
o
m
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
0
3
t
o
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
1
CO
M
M
E
N
T
O
R
N
A
M
E
AN
D
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
Project Description
Aesthetics
Agriculture and Forestry
Air Quality
Biological Resources
Cultural Resources
Geology / Soils
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Hazards / Hazardous Materials
Hydrology / Water Quality
Land Use and Planning
Mineral Resources
Noise
Population / Housing
Public Services
Recreation
Transportation / Traffic
Utilities / Service Systems
Construction Impacts
Alternatives
Other
Requests to be Notified
SU
M
M
A
R
Y
O
F
CO
M
M
E
N
T
D2
1
A
d
r
i
a
n
J
u
n
c
o
s
a
Ma
y
3
0
,
2
0
0
7
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
c
l
o
s
u
r
e
o
n
th
e
C
E
Q
A
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
o
f
t
h
e
D
E
I
R
an
d
i
f
p
a
s
t
c
o
m
m
e
n
t
s
w
i
l
l
b
e
co
n
s
i
d
e
r
e
d
i
n
f
u
t
u
r
e
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
.
E.
L
e
t
t
e
r
s
R
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
I
n
R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
T
o
T
h
e
T
o
w
n
’
s
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
R
o
u
t
i
n
g
R
e
q
u
e
s
t
P
r
o
c
e
ss
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
a
n
y
o
n
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
S
u
b
d
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
E
I
R
J
u
l
y
2
0
1
0
Pu
b
l
i
c
A
g
e
n
c
i
e
s
/
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
r
s
E1
M
i
k
e
C
o
n
n
e
l
l
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
W
a
t
e
r
P
l
a
n
n
e
r
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
D
o
n
n
e
r
P
u
b
l
i
c
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
PO
B
o
x
3
0
9
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
0
Ju
l
y
2
0
,
2
0
1
0
Id
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
TD
P
U
D
r
e
v
i
e
w
a
n
d
p
r
o
b
a
b
l
e
mo
d
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
t
h
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
wa
t
e
r
s
y
s
t
e
m
s
;
t
h
e
e
x
t
e
n
t
a
n
d
na
t
u
r
e
w
i
l
l
b
e
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
d
a
t
t
h
e
ti
m
e
o
f
r
e
v
i
e
w
.
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
in
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
o
n
h
o
w
t
o
b
e
g
i
n
t
h
e
re
v
i
e
w
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
.
E2
B
o
b
B
e
n
a
,
I
F
C
M
A
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
F
i
r
e
P
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
10
0
4
9
D
o
n
n
e
r
P
a
s
s
R
o
a
d
o
r
PO
B
o
x
2
6
7
8
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
0
Ju
l
y
2
2
,
2
0
1
0
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
d
e
s
i
g
n
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
f
o
r
th
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
an
d
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
s
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
T
F
P
D
fe
e
s
.
18
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
R
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
E
I
R
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
a
n
y
on
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
n
t
h
e
T
o
w
n
o
f
T
r
u
c
k
e
e
f
r
o
m
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
0
3
t
o
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
1
CO
M
M
E
N
T
O
R
N
A
M
E
AN
D
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
Project Description
Aesthetics
Agriculture and Forestry
Air Quality
Biological Resources
Cultural Resources
Geology / Soils
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Hazards / Hazardous Materials
Hydrology / Water Quality
Land Use and Planning
Mineral Resources
Noise
Population / Housing
Public Services
Recreation
Transportation / Traffic
Utilities / Service Systems
Construction Impacts
Alternatives
Other
Requests to be Notified
SU
M
M
A
R
Y
O
F
CO
M
M
E
N
T
E3
S
a
r
a
H
o
l
m
As
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
W
i
l
d
l
i
f
e
B
i
o
l
o
g
i
s
t
(N
e
v
a
d
a
a
n
d
P
l
a
c
e
r
C
o
u
n
t
y
)
CA
D
e
p
t
o
f
F
i
s
h
&
G
a
m
e
17
0
1
N
i
m
b
u
s
R
o
a
d
,
S
u
i
t
e
A
Ra
n
c
h
o
C
o
r
d
o
v
a
,
C
A
9
5
6
7
0
Ju
l
y
2
6
,
2
0
1
0
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
f
o
r
ha
b
i
t
a
t
o
f
t
h
e
V
e
r
d
i
m
u
l
e
d
e
e
r
su
b
-
h
e
r
d
i
n
b
o
t
h
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
a
n
d
Ne
v
a
d
a
.
I
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
s
t
h
a
t
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
st
u
d
i
e
s
o
f
t
h
e
h
e
r
d
a
r
e
o
n
g
o
i
n
g
th
r
o
u
g
h
c
o
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
v
e
e
f
f
o
r
t
s
o
f
bo
t
h
C
A
D
F
G
a
n
d
N
D
O
W
,
b
u
t
be
l
i
e
v
e
s
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
o
n
t
h
e
si
t
e
w
i
l
l
b
e
d
e
t
r
i
m
e
n
t
a
l
t
o
t
h
e
he
r
d
.
I
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
s
w
i
l
d
l
i
f
e
s
a
f
e
t
y
me
a
s
u
r
e
s
f
o
r
c
o
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
.
E4
S
a
n
n
a
S
c
h
l
o
s
s
e
r
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
W
a
t
e
r
P
l
a
n
n
e
r
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
D
o
n
n
e
r
P
u
b
l
i
c
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
PO
B
o
x
3
0
9
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
0
Ju
l
y
2
6
,
2
0
1
0
Id
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
o
u
t
s
i
d
e
o
f
th
e
T
D
P
U
D
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
a
r
e
a
.
E5
S
u
e
M
i
t
c
h
e
l
l
,
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
C
l
e
r
k
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
D
o
n
n
e
r
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
an
d
P
a
r
k
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
su
e
@
t
r
p
d
.
o
r
g
Ju
l
y
2
6
,
2
0
1
0
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
o
n
po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
f
e
e
s
.
19
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
R
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
E
I
R
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
a
n
y
on
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
n
t
h
e
T
o
w
n
o
f
T
r
u
c
k
e
e
f
r
o
m
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
0
3
t
o
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
1
CO
M
M
E
N
T
O
R
N
A
M
E
AN
D
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
Project Description
Aesthetics
Agriculture and Forestry
Air Quality
Biological Resources
Cultural Resources
Geology / Soils
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Hazards / Hazardous Materials
Hydrology / Water Quality
Land Use and Planning
Mineral Resources
Noise
Population / Housing
Public Services
Recreation
Transportation / Traffic
Utilities / Service Systems
Construction Impacts
Alternatives
Other
Requests to be Notified
SU
M
M
A
R
Y
O
F
CO
M
M
E
N
T
E6
T
o
b
i
T
y
l
e
r
,
W
a
t
e
r
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
Co
n
t
r
o
l
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
Ca
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
W
a
t
e
r
Qu
a
l
i
t
y
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
B
o
a
r
d
La
h
o
n
t
a
n
R
e
g
i
o
n
25
0
1
L
a
k
e
T
a
h
o
e
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
So
u
t
h
L
a
k
e
T
a
h
o
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
5
0
Ju
l
y
2
7
,
2
0
1
0
Re
q
u
e
s
t
s
w
e
t
l
a
n
d
d
e
l
i
n
e
a
t
i
o
n
b
e
up
d
a
t
e
d
;
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
s
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
ex
e
m
p
t
i
o
n
p
e
r
m
i
t
s
t
h
a
t
m
a
y
b
e
re
q
u
i
r
e
d
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
t
h
e
N
P
D
E
S
St
o
r
m
w
a
t
e
r
P
e
r
m
i
t
.
E7
T
o
m
M
a
r
t
i
n
Co
u
n
t
y
S
u
r
v
e
y
o
r
Co
u
n
t
y
o
f
N
e
v
a
d
a
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
De
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
95
0
M
a
i
d
u
A
v
e
n
u
e
Ne
v
a
d
a
C
i
t
y
,
C
A
9
5
9
5
9
Au
g
u
s
t
3
,
2
0
1
0
Re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
s
t
h
e
p
a
r
c
e
l
t
h
a
t
pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
a
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
(A
P
N
4
8
-
2
4
0
-
1
5
)
b
e
a
n
n
e
x
e
d
in
t
o
t
h
e
T
o
w
n
o
f
T
r
u
c
k
e
e
p
r
i
o
r
to
t
h
e
r
e
c
o
r
d
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
a
n
y
p
h
a
s
e
of
t
h
e
f
i
n
a
l
m
a
p
.
E8
E
r
i
n
H
e
s
s
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
M
a
n
a
g
e
r
Re
g
u
l
a
t
o
r
D
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
,
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
No
r
t
h
B
r
a
n
c
h
U.
S
.
A
r
m
y
C
o
r
p
s
o
f
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
s
,
Sa
c
r
a
m
e
n
t
o
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
13
2
5
J
S
t
r
e
e
t
,
R
o
o
m
1
4
8
0
Sa
c
r
a
m
e
n
t
o
,
C
A
9
5
8
1
4
Au
g
u
s
t
2
,
1
0
1
0
Id
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
s
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
w
e
t
l
a
n
d
de
l
i
n
e
a
t
i
o
n
e
x
p
i
r
e
d
o
n
J
u
n
e
7
,
20
1
0
a
n
d
a
n
e
w
d
e
l
i
n
e
a
t
i
o
n
i
s
re
q
u
i
r
e
d
.
20
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
R
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
E
I
R
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
a
n
y
on
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
n
t
h
e
T
o
w
n
o
f
T
r
u
c
k
e
e
f
r
o
m
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
0
3
t
o
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
1
CO
M
M
E
N
T
O
R
N
A
M
E
AN
D
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
Project Description
Aesthetics
Agriculture and Forestry
Air Quality
Biological Resources
Cultural Resources
Geology / Soils
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Hazards / Hazardous Materials
Hydrology / Water Quality
Land Use and Planning
Mineral Resources
Noise
Population / Housing
Public Services
Recreation
Transportation / Traffic
Utilities / Service Systems
Construction Impacts
Alternatives
Other
Requests to be Notified
SU
M
M
A
R
Y
O
F
CO
M
M
E
N
T
E9
J
a
n
e
t
M
a
n
n
,
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
Sp
e
c
i
a
l
i
s
t
De
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
o
f
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
He
a
l
t
h
Co
u
n
t
y
o
f
N
e
v
a
d
a
Au
g
u
s
t
2
4
,
2
0
1
0
St
a
t
e
s
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
r
e
a
r
e
n
o
k
n
o
w
n
wa
t
e
r
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
i
s
s
u
e
s
a
t
t
h
e
s
i
t
e
an
d
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
n
o
t
wi
t
h
i
n
b
u
t
i
s
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
t
o
a
n
ab
a
n
d
o
n
e
d
s
o
l
d
w
a
s
t
e
d
i
s
p
o
s
a
l
si
t
e
.
T
h
e
D
E
H
h
a
s
n
o
o
b
j
e
c
t
i
o
n
to
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
a
n
d
ha
s
n
o
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
F
e
e
s
ma
y
a
p
p
l
y
.
Pr
i
v
a
t
e
I
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
s
a
n
d
O
r
g
a
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
s
E1
0
C
r
a
i
g
W
i
l
s
o
n
Ma
r
t
i
s
P
e
a
k
H
o
m
e
o
w
n
e
r
s
As
s
o
c
i
a
t
i
o
n
16
1
6
5
M
a
r
t
i
s
P
e
a
k
R
o
a
d
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
1
Ju
l
y
2
5
,
2
0
1
0
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
o
n
Ma
r
t
i
s
P
e
a
k
R
o
a
d
a
n
d
M
a
r
t
i
s
Pe
a
k
R
o
a
d
/
G
l
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
D
r
i
v
e
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
;
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
t
o
o
b
i
g
f
o
r
on
e
e
n
t
r
a
n
c
e
o
n
l
y
;
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
s
a
f
e
t
y
.
Re
q
u
e
s
t
s
t
o
r
e
v
i
e
w
t
h
e
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
st
u
d
y
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
T
o
w
n
a
n
d
t
o
b
e
ad
d
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
n
o
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
li
s
t
.
E1
1
M
a
n
o
n
C
e
l
a
y
a
-
W
i
l
l
i
n
g
h
a
m
,
Bo
a
r
d
M
e
m
b
e
r
Gl
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
D
e
v
o
n
s
h
i
r
e
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
Ow
n
e
r
’
s
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
i
o
n
ma
n
o
n
@
t
a
h
o
e
4
s
a
l
e
.
c
o
m
Ju
l
y
2
6
,
2
0
1
0
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
va
l
u
e
s
;
g
h
o
s
t
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
;
tr
a
f
f
i
c
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
;
a
e
s
t
h
e
t
i
c
s
;
n
o
i
s
e
;
wa
t
e
r
s
u
p
p
l
y
;
i
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
im
p
a
c
t
s
;
w
a
s
t
e
w
a
t
e
r
t
r
e
a
t
m
e
n
t
;
pu
b
l
i
c
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
;
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
;
t
o
w
n
bu
i
l
d
o
u
t
;
a
i
r
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
;
w
i
l
d
l
i
f
e
re
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
;
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
T
D
R
;
a
n
d
so
l
i
d
w
a
s
t
e
.
21
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
R
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
E
I
R
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
a
n
y
on
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
n
t
h
e
T
o
w
n
o
f
T
r
u
c
k
e
e
f
r
o
m
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
0
3
t
o
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
1
CO
M
M
E
N
T
O
R
N
A
M
E
AN
D
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
Project Description
Aesthetics
Agriculture and Forestry
Air Quality
Biological Resources
Cultural Resources
Geology / Soils
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Hazards / Hazardous Materials
Hydrology / Water Quality
Land Use and Planning
Mineral Resources
Noise
Population / Housing
Public Services
Recreation
Transportation / Traffic
Utilities / Service Systems
Construction Impacts
Alternatives
Other
Requests to be Notified
SU
M
M
A
R
Y
O
F
CO
M
M
E
N
T
E1
2
T
h
e
M
e
a
d
o
w
s
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
i
o
n
Bo
a
r
d
o
f
D
i
r
e
c
t
o
r
s
PO
B
o
x
1
6
9
6
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
0
Ju
l
y
2
6
,
2
0
1
0
Re
q
u
e
s
t
s
a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
o
f
r
e
d
u
c
e
d
de
n
s
i
t
y
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
.
C
o
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
ab
o
u
t
W
h
i
t
e
h
o
r
s
e
R
d
/
M
a
r
t
i
s
Pe
a
k
R
d
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
.
F.
L
e
t
t
e
r
s
R
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
I
n
R
e
s
p
o
n
s
e
T
o
T
h
e
N
o
t
i
c
e
O
f
P
r
e
p
a
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
T
h
e
C
a
n
y
o
n
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
S
u
b
d
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
E
I
R
D
a
t
e
d
A
p
r
i
l
1
8
,
2
0
1
1
Pu
b
l
i
c
A
g
e
n
c
i
e
s
/
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
r
s
F1
N
e
i
l
K
a
u
f
m
a
n
,
P
.
E
.
Wa
t
e
r
S
y
s
t
e
m
s
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
D
o
n
n
e
r
P
u
b
l
i
c
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
PO
B
o
x
3
0
9
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
0
Ap
r
i
l
2
1
,
2
0
1
1
Id
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
n
o
t
i
n
TD
P
U
D
w
a
t
e
r
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
t
e
r
r
i
t
o
r
y
.
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
m
a
y
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
a
n
n
e
x
a
t
i
o
n
in
t
o
T
D
P
U
D
;
T
D
P
U
D
i
s
n
o
t
aw
a
r
e
o
f
a
n
y
s
p
e
c
i
a
l
s
t
u
d
i
e
s
re
q
u
i
r
e
d
;
a
l
l
o
n
-
s
i
t
e
w
a
t
e
r
in
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
i
s
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
b
y
de
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
;
o
f
f
-
s
i
t
e
w
a
t
e
r
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
w
o
u
l
d
b
e
re
q
u
i
r
e
d
.
F2
D
a
n
i
e
l
B
.
L
a
n
d
o
n
Ex
e
c
u
t
i
v
e
D
i
r
e
c
t
o
r
Ne
v
a
d
a
C
o
u
n
t
y
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
10
1
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
n
c
e
M
i
n
e
R
d
,
S
u
i
t
e
10
2
Ne
v
a
d
a
C
i
t
y
,
C
A
9
5
9
5
9
Ap
r
i
l
2
5
,
2
0
1
1
Id
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
s
t
h
e
N
C
T
C
i
s
in
t
e
r
e
s
t
e
d
i
n
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
n
g
t
h
e
D
E
I
R
.
Ac
k
n
o
w
l
e
d
g
e
s
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
ou
t
s
i
d
e
t
h
e
T
r
u
c
k
e
e
T
a
h
o
e
Ai
r
p
o
r
t
L
a
n
d
U
s
e
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
’
s
es
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
e
d
l
a
n
d
u
s
e
co
m
p
a
t
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
z
o
n
e
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
T
a
h
o
e
A
i
r
p
o
r
t
a
n
d
n
o
fu
r
t
h
e
r
r
e
v
i
e
w
w
i
l
l
b
e
n
e
c
e
s
s
a
r
y
by
t
h
e
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
.
22
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
R
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
E
I
R
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
a
n
y
on
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
n
t
h
e
T
o
w
n
o
f
T
r
u
c
k
e
e
f
r
o
m
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
0
3
t
o
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
1
CO
M
M
E
N
T
O
R
N
A
M
E
AN
D
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
Project Description
Aesthetics
Agriculture and Forestry
Air Quality
Biological Resources
Cultural Resources
Geology / Soils
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Hazards / Hazardous Materials
Hydrology / Water Quality
Land Use and Planning
Mineral Resources
Noise
Population / Housing
Public Services
Recreation
Transportation / Traffic
Utilities / Service Systems
Construction Impacts
Alternatives
Other
Requests to be Notified
SU
M
M
A
R
Y
O
F
CO
M
M
E
N
T
F3
S
c
o
t
t
M
o
r
g
a
n
Di
r
e
c
t
o
r
o
f
S
t
a
t
e
Cl
e
a
r
i
n
g
h
o
u
s
e
OP
R
–
S
t
a
t
e
C
l
e
a
r
i
n
g
h
o
u
s
e
14
0
0
1
0
th
St
r
e
e
t
o
r
P
O
B
o
x
30
4
4
Sa
c
r
a
m
e
n
t
o
,
C
A
9
5
8
1
2
Ap
r
i
l
2
5
,
2
0
1
1
Le
t
t
e
r
f
r
o
m
S
C
H
t
o
r
e
v
i
e
w
i
n
g
ag
e
n
c
i
e
s
.
F4
S
R
J
o
n
e
s
Ex
e
c
u
t
i
v
e
O
f
f
i
c
e
r
N
e
v
a
d
a
LA
F
C
o
el
l
i
o
t
@
e
m
u
l
b
e
r
g
.
c
o
m
Ma
y
2
,
2
0
1
1
Id
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
s
t
h
e
y
a
r
e
a
r
e
s
p
o
n
s
i
b
l
e
ag
e
n
c
y
f
o
r
a
n
n
e
x
a
t
i
o
n
t
o
TU
P
U
D
f
o
r
t
r
e
a
t
e
d
w
a
t
e
r
se
r
v
i
c
e
.
N
o
t
e
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
w
i
t
h
i
n
Li
b
e
r
t
y
E
n
e
r
g
y
(
f
o
r
m
a
l
l
y
N
V
En
e
r
g
y
)
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
a
r
e
a
.
I
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
s
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
S
a
n
i
t
a
r
y
A
g
e
n
c
y
w
i
l
l
pr
o
v
i
d
e
w
a
s
t
e
w
a
t
e
r
p
e
r
T
a
h
o
e
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
S
a
n
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
A
g
e
n
c
y
a
n
d
se
r
v
i
c
e
c
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
s
h
o
u
l
d
b
e
in
c
l
u
d
e
d
i
n
E
I
R
.
F5
B
l
a
k
e
T
r
e
s
a
n
,
P
.
E
.
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
S
a
n
i
t
a
r
y
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
12
3
0
4
J
o
e
r
g
e
r
D
r
i
v
e
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
1
Ma
y
4
,
2
0
1
1
TS
D
w
i
l
l
b
e
s
e
w
e
r
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
r
a
n
d
wi
l
l
r
e
v
i
e
w
s
i
t
e
p
l
a
n
s
.
N
o
t
e
s
bo
t
h
o
n
-
s
i
t
e
a
n
d
o
f
f
-
s
i
t
e
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
w
i
l
l
b
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
to
s
e
r
v
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
.
B
e
l
i
e
v
e
s
E
I
R
sc
o
p
e
s
h
o
u
l
d
c
o
v
e
r
s
e
w
e
r
in
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
t
o
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
f
u
t
u
r
e
se
r
v
i
c
e
t
o
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
l
o
t
s
o
w
n
e
d
by
t
h
e
R
a
l
e
y
C
o
r
p
.
23
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
R
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
E
I
R
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
a
n
y
on
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
n
t
h
e
T
o
w
n
o
f
T
r
u
c
k
e
e
f
r
o
m
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
0
3
t
o
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
1
CO
M
M
E
N
T
O
R
N
A
M
E
AN
D
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
Project Description
Aesthetics
Agriculture and Forestry
Air Quality
Biological Resources
Cultural Resources
Geology / Soils
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Hazards / Hazardous Materials
Hydrology / Water Quality
Land Use and Planning
Mineral Resources
Noise
Population / Housing
Public Services
Recreation
Transportation / Traffic
Utilities / Service Systems
Construction Impacts
Alternatives
Other
Requests to be Notified
SU
M
M
A
R
Y
O
F
CO
M
M
E
N
T
F6
K
a
t
y
S
a
n
c
h
e
z
Na
t
i
v
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n
H
e
r
i
t
a
g
e
Co
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
91
5
C
a
p
i
t
o
l
M
a
l
l
R
o
o
m
3
6
4
Sa
c
r
a
m
e
n
t
o
,
C
A
9
5
8
1
4
Ma
y
1
0
,
2
0
1
1
In
c
l
u
d
e
s
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
co
n
d
u
c
t
a
r
e
c
o
r
d
s
s
e
a
r
c
h
a
n
d
ot
h
e
r
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
r
e
s
e
a
r
c
h
t
h
a
t
ma
y
b
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
.
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
l
i
s
t
of
N
a
t
i
v
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n
c
o
n
t
a
c
t
s
.
F7
B
o
b
B
e
n
a
,
I
F
C
M
A
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
F
i
r
e
P
r
o
t
e
c
t
i
o
n
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
10
0
4
9
D
o
n
n
e
r
P
a
s
s
R
o
a
d
o
r
PO
B
o
x
2
6
7
8
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
0
Ma
y
1
2
,
2
0
1
1
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
d
e
s
i
g
n
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
f
o
r
th
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
an
d
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
s
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
T
F
P
D
fe
e
s
.
F8
R
y
a
n
M
u
r
a
n
o
,
A
i
r
P
o
l
l
u
t
i
o
n
Co
n
t
r
o
l
S
p
e
c
i
a
l
i
s
t
I
I
I
No
r
t
h
e
r
n
S
i
e
r
r
a
A
i
r
Q
u
a
l
i
t
y
Ma
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
13
4
5
0
D
o
n
n
e
r
P
a
s
s
R
d
,
S
t
e
B
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
1
Ma
y
1
7
,
2
0
1
1
Re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
s
a
n
A
i
r
Q
u
a
l
i
t
y
An
a
l
y
s
i
s
b
e
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
a
n
d
pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
p
e
r
m
i
t
s
t
h
a
t
ma
y
b
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
a
s
w
e
l
l
a
s
re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
e
d
t
h
r
e
s
h
o
l
d
s
a
n
d
mi
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
.
F9
A
l
a
n
M
i
l
l
e
r
,
P
.
E
.
,
C
h
i
e
f
,
N
o
r
t
h
Ba
s
i
n
R
e
g
u
l
a
t
o
r
y
U
n
i
t
Ca
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
R
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
W
a
t
e
r
Qu
a
l
i
t
y
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
B
o
a
r
d
La
h
o
n
t
a
n
R
e
g
i
o
n
25
0
1
L
a
k
e
T
a
h
o
e
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
So
u
t
h
L
a
k
e
T
a
h
o
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
5
0
Ma
y
1
8
,
2
0
1
1
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
p
e
r
m
i
t
s
t
h
a
t
ma
y
b
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
a
s
w
e
l
l
a
s
po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
,
re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
e
d
t
h
r
e
s
h
o
l
d
s
a
n
d
mi
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
.
24
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
R
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
E
I
R
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
a
n
y
on
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
n
t
h
e
T
o
w
n
o
f
T
r
u
c
k
e
e
f
r
o
m
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
0
3
t
o
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
1
CO
M
M
E
N
T
O
R
N
A
M
E
AN
D
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
Project Description
Aesthetics
Agriculture and Forestry
Air Quality
Biological Resources
Cultural Resources
Geology / Soils
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Hazards / Hazardous Materials
Hydrology / Water Quality
Land Use and Planning
Mineral Resources
Noise
Population / Housing
Public Services
Recreation
Transportation / Traffic
Utilities / Service Systems
Construction Impacts
Alternatives
Other
Requests to be Notified
SU
M
M
A
R
Y
O
F
CO
M
M
E
N
T
F1
0
J
e
f
f
D
r
o
n
g
e
s
e
n
En
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
Ma
n
a
g
e
r
CA
D
e
p
t
o
f
F
i
s
h
&
G
a
m
e
17
0
1
N
i
m
b
u
s
R
o
a
d
,
S
u
i
t
e
A
Ra
n
c
h
o
C
o
r
d
o
v
a
,
C
A
9
5
6
7
0
Ma
y
2
3
,
2
0
1
1
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
p
e
r
m
i
t
s
a
n
d
fe
e
s
t
h
a
t
m
a
y
b
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
a
n
d
su
g
g
e
s
t
s
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
t
o
f
i
s
h
an
d
w
i
l
d
l
i
f
e
b
e
a
n
a
l
y
z
e
d
,
re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
e
d
t
h
r
e
s
h
o
l
d
s
a
n
d
mi
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
m
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
.
F1
1
E
r
i
c
H
o
n
g
,
C
h
i
e
f
No
r
t
h
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
R
e
g
i
o
n
O
f
f
i
c
e
De
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
o
f
W
a
t
e
r
Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
14
1
6
N
i
n
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
PO
B
o
x
9
4
2
8
3
6
Sa
c
r
a
m
e
n
t
o
,
C
A
9
4
2
3
6
Ma
y
2
7
,
2
0
1
1
Pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
i
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
o
n
t
h
e
TR
O
A
a
n
d
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
s
co
n
s
i
d
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
’
s
re
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
h
i
p
t
o
t
h
e
a
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
.
Pr
i
v
a
t
e
I
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
s
a
n
d
O
r
g
a
n
i
z
a
t
i
o
n
s
F1
2
K
r
i
s
t
i
n
E
.
T
h
o
m
p
s
o
n
10
4
8
0
R
e
g
e
n
c
y
C
i
r
c
l
e
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
1
Kr
i
s
t
i
@
m
w
a
-
t
r
u
c
k
e
e
.
c
o
m
Ap
r
i
l
2
0
,
2
0
1
1
Re
q
u
e
s
t
s
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
a
n
a
l
y
z
e
p
e
a
k
lo
a
d
s
d
u
r
i
n
g
s
c
h
o
o
l
d
a
y
be
t
w
e
e
n
7
–
9
:
3
0
a
m
a
n
d
3
-
7p
m
.
25
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
R
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
E
I
R
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
a
n
y
on
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
n
t
h
e
T
o
w
n
o
f
T
r
u
c
k
e
e
f
r
o
m
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
0
3
t
o
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
1
CO
M
M
E
N
T
O
R
N
A
M
E
AN
D
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
Project Description
Aesthetics
Agriculture and Forestry
Air Quality
Biological Resources
Cultural Resources
Geology / Soils
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Hazards / Hazardous Materials
Hydrology / Water Quality
Land Use and Planning
Mineral Resources
Noise
Population / Housing
Public Services
Recreation
Transportation / Traffic
Utilities / Service Systems
Construction Impacts
Alternatives
Other
Requests to be Notified
SU
M
M
A
R
Y
O
F
CO
M
M
E
N
T
F1
3
T
h
e
M
e
a
d
o
w
s
H
O
A
PO
B
o
x
1
6
9
6
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
0
Ap
r
i
l
2
9
,
2
0
1
1
Re
q
u
e
s
t
s
a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
o
f
t
o
t
a
l
po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
;
W
h
i
t
e
h
o
r
s
e
Rd
/
M
a
r
t
i
s
P
e
a
k
R
d
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
;
tr
a
f
f
i
c
c
o
u
n
t
s
d
u
r
i
n
g
w
o
r
k
w
e
e
k
an
d
d
u
r
i
n
g
s
c
h
o
o
l
;
e
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
ev
a
c
u
a
t
i
o
n
;
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
o
f
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
;
V
e
r
d
i
-
L
o
y
a
l
t
o
n
de
e
r
h
e
r
d
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
l
o
c
a
l
sp
e
c
i
e
s
;
u
p
d
a
t
e
w
e
t
l
a
n
d
de
l
i
n
e
a
t
i
o
n
;
e
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
s
;
p
u
b
l
i
c
tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
a
f
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
ho
u
s
i
n
g
;
w
a
t
e
r
s
y
s
t
e
m
;
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
;
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
&
Vi
s
i
o
n
S
t
a
t
e
m
e
n
t
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
c
y
;
F1
4
J
e
a
n
B
r
o
o
k
s
10
4
6
8
E
v
e
n
s
h
a
m
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
1
Ma
y
1
4
,
2
0
1
1
Co
n
c
e
r
n
s
a
b
o
u
t
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
i
n
Gl
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
a
r
e
a
;
n
o
a
c
c
e
s
s
i
b
l
e
pu
b
l
i
c
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
o
r
b
i
k
e
ro
u
t
e
s
;
w
e
t
l
a
n
d
&
w
i
l
d
l
i
f
e
im
p
a
c
t
s
;
F1
5
R
i
c
k
S
e
e
g
m
i
l
l
e
r
11
7
1
6
W
h
i
t
e
h
o
r
s
e
R
o
a
d
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
1
rk
s
r
a
r
@
a
o
l
.
c
o
m
Ma
y
1
5
,
2
0
1
1
Re
q
u
e
s
t
s
a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
o
f
W
h
i
t
e
h
o
r
s
e
Rd
/
M
a
r
t
i
s
P
e
a
k
R
d
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
;
wi
n
t
e
r
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
s
a
f
e
t
y
;
V
e
r
d
i
-
Lo
y
a
l
t
o
n
d
e
e
r
h
e
r
d
a
n
d
o
t
h
e
r
wi
l
d
l
i
f
e
;
s
u
g
g
e
s
t
s
m
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
26
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
R
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
E
I
R
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
a
n
y
on
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
n
t
h
e
T
o
w
n
o
f
T
r
u
c
k
e
e
f
r
o
m
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
0
3
t
o
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
1
CO
M
M
E
N
T
O
R
N
A
M
E
AN
D
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
Project Description
Aesthetics
Agriculture and Forestry
Air Quality
Biological Resources
Cultural Resources
Geology / Soils
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Hazards / Hazardous Materials
Hydrology / Water Quality
Land Use and Planning
Mineral Resources
Noise
Population / Housing
Public Services
Recreation
Transportation / Traffic
Utilities / Service Systems
Construction Impacts
Alternatives
Other
Requests to be Notified
SU
M
M
A
R
Y
O
F
CO
M
M
E
N
T
F1
6
C
r
a
i
g
W
i
l
s
o
n
Ma
r
t
i
s
P
e
a
k
H
o
m
e
o
w
n
e
r
s
As
s
o
c
i
a
t
i
o
n
0
7
/
2
5
/
1
0
L
e
t
t
e
r
16
1
6
5
M
a
r
t
i
s
P
e
a
k
R
o
a
d
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
1
Ma
y
1
7
,
2
0
1
1
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
o
n
Ma
r
t
i
s
P
e
a
k
R
o
a
d
a
n
d
M
a
r
t
i
s
Pe
a
k
R
o
a
d
/
G
l
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
D
r
i
v
e
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
;
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
t
o
o
b
i
g
f
o
r
on
e
e
n
t
r
a
n
c
e
o
n
l
y
;
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
s
a
f
e
t
y
.
Re
q
u
e
s
t
s
t
o
r
e
v
i
e
w
t
h
e
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
st
u
d
y
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
T
o
w
n
a
n
d
t
o
b
e
ad
d
e
d
t
o
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
n
o
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
li
s
t
.
F1
7
M
a
r
t
h
a
F
r
a
n
t
z
17
0
7
3
G
l
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
D
r
i
v
e
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
1
Ma
y
1
8
,
2
0
1
1
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
i
n
Gl
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
a
r
e
a
;
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
t
o
wi
l
d
l
i
f
e
a
n
d
d
e
e
r
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
s
;
we
t
l
a
n
d
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
a
n
d
e
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
im
p
a
c
t
t
o
G
l
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
r
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
.
F1
8
E
v
a
S
t
r
a
m
e
r
N
i
c
h
o
l
s
16
1
2
7
W
e
l
l
i
n
g
t
o
n
W
a
y
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
1
Ma
y
1
9
,
2
0
1
1
Re
q
u
e
s
t
s
a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
o
f
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
;
t
h
e
po
n
d
;
w
i
l
d
l
i
f
e
a
n
d
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
s
;
ov
e
r
c
r
o
w
d
e
d
s
c
h
o
o
l
s
;
p
o
o
r
ro
a
d
c
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
s
;
b
i
k
e
s
a
f
e
t
y
;
ec
o
n
o
m
i
c
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
;
u
t
i
l
i
t
y
de
m
a
n
d
s
;
e
n
e
r
g
y
r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
;
F1
9
M
i
c
h
a
e
l
K
e
t
r
o
n
15
2
5
7
G
l
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
D
r
i
v
e
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
1
no
c
h
e
i
n
m
a
l
b
i
t
t
e
@
n
e
t
z
e
r
o
.
c
o
m
Ma
y
2
0
,
2
0
1
1
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
i
n
Gl
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
a
r
e
a
;
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
n
d
bi
c
y
c
l
e
s
a
f
e
t
y
;
27
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
R
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
E
I
R
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
a
n
y
on
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
n
t
h
e
T
o
w
n
o
f
T
r
u
c
k
e
e
f
r
o
m
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
0
3
t
o
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
1
CO
M
M
E
N
T
O
R
N
A
M
E
AN
D
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
Project Description
Aesthetics
Agriculture and Forestry
Air Quality
Biological Resources
Cultural Resources
Geology / Soils
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Hazards / Hazardous Materials
Hydrology / Water Quality
Land Use and Planning
Mineral Resources
Noise
Population / Housing
Public Services
Recreation
Transportation / Traffic
Utilities / Service Systems
Construction Impacts
Alternatives
Other
Requests to be Notified
SU
M
M
A
R
Y
O
F
CO
M
M
E
N
T
F2
0
M
i
k
e
S
t
a
r
r
e
t
t
11
4
7
7
E
a
s
t
R
i
d
g
e
R
o
a
d
PO
B
o
x
9
0
4
7
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
0
4
7
Ma
y
2
0
,
2
0
1
1
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
tr
a
f
f
i
c
a
n
d
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
t
o
O
l
y
m
p
i
c
He
i
g
h
t
s
s
u
b
d
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
e
g
r
e
s
s
.
F2
1
J
a
n
e
t
F
e
i
c
k
ja
n
e
t
f
e
i
c
k
@
g
m
a
i
l
.
c
o
m
Ma
y
2
0
,
2
0
1
1
Su
p
p
o
r
t
s
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
F2
2
K
.
V
a
l
e
r
i
e
G
r
e
e
n
va
l
e
r
i
e
g
r
e
e
n
r
e
@
g
m
a
i
l
.
c
o
m
Ma
y
2
0
,
2
0
1
1
Su
p
p
o
r
t
s
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
F2
3
M
a
r
t
i
s
P
e
a
k
H
O
A
Bo
a
r
d
o
f
D
i
r
e
c
t
o
r
s
PO
B
o
x
1
4
3
1
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
0
Ma
y
2
0
,
2
0
1
1
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
o
n
Ma
r
t
i
s
P
e
a
k
R
o
a
d
;
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
s
an
a
l
y
s
i
s
o
f
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
o
n
G
l
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
Dr
i
v
e
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
H
i
r
s
c
h
d
a
l
e
a
n
d
Ma
r
t
i
s
P
e
a
k
R
o
a
d
;
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
de
n
s
i
t
y
o
n
e
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
ev
a
c
u
a
t
i
o
n
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
;
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
im
p
a
c
t
s
F2
4
N
e
i
l
P
a
n
k
l
e
r
17
0
7
3
G
l
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
D
r
i
v
e
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
1
Ma
y
2
0
,
2
0
1
1
Re
q
u
e
s
t
s
a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
o
f
t
o
t
a
l
po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
;
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
w
i
t
h
ma
x
i
m
u
m
p
e
r
m
i
t
t
e
d
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
;
tr
a
f
f
i
c
i
n
b
o
t
h
w
i
n
t
e
r
a
n
d
su
m
m
e
r
;
p
u
b
l
i
c
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
c
o
s
t
s
;
F2
5
R
e
b
e
c
c
a
R
e
i
c
h
Ma
y
2
0
,
2
0
1
1
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
i
n
Gl
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
a
r
e
a
;
s
u
b
s
e
q
u
e
n
t
tr
a
f
f
i
c
t
r
i
p
s
f
r
o
m
l
o
s
s
o
f
re
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
;
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
o
n
Gl
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
p
o
n
d
.
28
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
R
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
E
I
R
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
a
n
y
on
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
n
t
h
e
T
o
w
n
o
f
T
r
u
c
k
e
e
f
r
o
m
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
0
3
t
o
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
1
CO
M
M
E
N
T
O
R
N
A
M
E
AN
D
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
Project Description
Aesthetics
Agriculture and Forestry
Air Quality
Biological Resources
Cultural Resources
Geology / Soils
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Hazards / Hazardous Materials
Hydrology / Water Quality
Land Use and Planning
Mineral Resources
Noise
Population / Housing
Public Services
Recreation
Transportation / Traffic
Utilities / Service Systems
Construction Impacts
Alternatives
Other
Requests to be Notified
SU
M
M
A
R
Y
O
F
CO
M
M
E
N
T
F2
6
D
a
n
W
a
r
r
e
n
,
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
M
a
n
a
g
e
r
Gl
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
D
e
v
o
n
s
h
i
r
e
Re
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
’
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
i
o
n
15
7
2
6
G
l
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
D
r
i
v
e
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
1
Ma
y
2
0
,
2
0
1
1
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
i
n
Gl
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
a
r
e
a
;
g
e
n
e
r
a
l
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
an
d
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
m
o
d
e
s
o
f
tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
a
f
e
t
y
;
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
;
w
a
t
e
r
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
to
r
i
p
a
r
i
a
n
h
a
b
i
t
a
t
a
n
d
G
l
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
La
k
e
;
f
l
o
o
d
i
n
g
;
t
o
t
a
l
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
im
p
a
c
t
s
t
o
p
o
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
;
wi
l
d
l
i
f
e
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
f
r
o
m
h
u
m
a
n
s
an
d
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
;
l
o
n
g
r
a
n
g
e
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
;
pu
b
l
i
c
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
s
n
o
w
re
m
o
v
a
l
;
e
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
s
;
s
a
f
e
t
y
&
po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
l
y
v
a
c
a
n
t
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
;
ae
s
t
h
e
t
i
c
s
t
o
v
i
e
w
s
h
e
d
.
F2
7
E
r
i
c
M
a
r
t
i
n
Ee
m
a
r
t
i
n
1
0
1
@
g
m
a
i
l
.
c
o
m
Ma
y
2
0
,
2
0
1
1
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
a
n
d
wi
l
d
l
i
f
e
.
F2
8
J
o
h
n
B
l
a
c
k
10
1
1
8
W
i
l
t
s
h
i
r
e
L
a
n
e
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
1
jb
6
0
1
@
s
b
c
g
l
o
b
a
l
.
n
e
t
Ma
y
2
1
,
2
0
1
1
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
w
i
l
d
l
i
f
e
a
n
d
op
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
.
29
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
R
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
E
I
R
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
a
n
y
on
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
n
t
h
e
T
o
w
n
o
f
T
r
u
c
k
e
e
f
r
o
m
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
0
3
t
o
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
1
CO
M
M
E
N
T
O
R
N
A
M
E
AN
D
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
Project Description
Aesthetics
Agriculture and Forestry
Air Quality
Biological Resources
Cultural Resources
Geology / Soils
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Hazards / Hazardous Materials
Hydrology / Water Quality
Land Use and Planning
Mineral Resources
Noise
Population / Housing
Public Services
Recreation
Transportation / Traffic
Utilities / Service Systems
Construction Impacts
Alternatives
Other
Requests to be Notified
SU
M
M
A
R
Y
O
F
CO
M
M
E
N
T
F2
9
N
e
i
l
B
l
u
m
e
n
f
i
e
l
d
10
6
0
5
B
e
l
f
o
r
d
P
l
a
c
e
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
1
Ma
y
2
1
,
2
0
1
1
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
i
n
Gl
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
a
r
e
a
a
n
d
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
t
o
on
e
o
p
e
n
a
c
c
e
s
s
p
o
i
n
t
;
cu
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
w
i
t
h
ad
j
a
c
e
n
t
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
;
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
de
n
s
i
t
y
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
t
o
e
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
ev
a
c
u
a
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
w
i
l
d
f
i
r
e
;
l
o
n
g
te
r
m
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
;
o
p
e
n
sp
a
c
e
a
n
d
r
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
;
w
i
l
d
l
i
f
e
mi
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
;
c
l
i
m
a
t
e
c
h
a
n
g
e
an
a
l
y
s
i
s
(
c
a
r
b
o
n
n
e
u
t
r
a
l
)
;
ec
o
n
o
m
i
c
s
.
F3
0
N
i
k
k
i
R
i
l
e
y
15
9
0
3
W
i
n
d
s
o
r
W
a
y
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
1
Ma
y
2
1
,
2
0
1
1
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
co
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
c
y
;
g
r
o
w
t
h
i
n
d
u
c
i
n
g
im
p
a
c
t
s
;
c
o
r
r
e
c
t
a
p
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
af
f
o
r
d
a
b
l
e
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
;
sc
h
o
o
l
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
;
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
a
n
a
l
y
z
e
d
du
r
i
n
g
s
c
h
o
o
l
;
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
t
o
Gl
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
f
r
o
m
o
n
e
a
c
c
e
s
s
p
o
i
n
t
;
cu
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
;
s
o
i
l
an
d
w
a
t
e
r
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
;
c
o
s
t
o
f
ut
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
;
h
a
z
a
r
d
s
f
r
o
m
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
el
e
c
t
r
i
c
s
u
b
s
t
a
t
i
o
n
;
e
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
ev
a
c
u
a
t
i
o
n
&
p
u
b
l
i
c
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
;
su
g
g
e
s
t
s
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
;
e
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
s
.
30
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
R
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
E
I
R
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
a
n
y
on
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
n
t
h
e
T
o
w
n
o
f
T
r
u
c
k
e
e
f
r
o
m
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
0
3
t
o
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
1
CO
M
M
E
N
T
O
R
N
A
M
E
AN
D
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
Project Description
Aesthetics
Agriculture and Forestry
Air Quality
Biological Resources
Cultural Resources
Geology / Soils
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Hazards / Hazardous Materials
Hydrology / Water Quality
Land Use and Planning
Mineral Resources
Noise
Population / Housing
Public Services
Recreation
Transportation / Traffic
Utilities / Service Systems
Construction Impacts
Alternatives
Other
Requests to be Notified
SU
M
M
A
R
Y
O
F
CO
M
M
E
N
T
F3
1
C
r
a
i
g
&
W
i
l
l
o
w
F
i
e
r
r
o
a
n
d
Ot
h
e
r
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
o
f
T
r
u
c
k
e
e
10
4
0
6
C
o
u
r
t
e
n
a
y
L
a
y
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
1
Ma
y
2
2
,
2
0
1
1
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
a
e
s
t
h
e
t
i
c
s
,
a
i
r
qu
a
l
i
t
y
;
g
r
e
e
n
h
o
u
s
e
g
a
s
em
i
s
s
i
o
n
s
;
w
i
l
d
l
i
f
e
a
n
d
t
r
e
e
re
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
;
w
a
t
e
r
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
;
n
o
i
s
e
;
tr
a
f
f
i
c
a
n
d
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
s
a
f
e
t
y
;
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
t
o
in
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
;
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
ph
a
s
i
n
g
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
;
s
u
g
g
e
s
t
s
al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
.
F3
2
T
e
d
T
h
o
m
p
s
o
n
go
o
d
d
o
g
r
a
n
c
h
@
m
i
n
d
s
p
r
i
n
g
.
c
o
m Ma
y
2
2
,
2
0
1
1
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
i
n
t
h
e
Gl
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
a
r
e
a
;
o
p
e
n
s
p
a
c
e
im
p
a
c
t
s
;
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
.
F3
3
S
u
s
a
n
B
e
a
u
c
h
a
m
p
Su
e
b
e
a
u
c
h
a
m
p
1
2
3
@
y
a
h
o
o
.
c
o
m Ma
y
2
2
,
2
0
1
1
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
tr
a
f
f
i
c
i
n
G
l
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
a
r
e
a
a
n
d
ha
z
a
r
d
s
a
t
M
a
r
t
i
s
Pe
a
k
/
W
h
i
t
e
h
o
r
s
e
R
o
a
d
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
;
g
r
o
w
t
h
i
n
d
u
c
i
n
g
im
p
a
c
t
s
a
s
r
e
s
u
l
t
o
f
b
r
i
d
g
e
;
im
p
a
c
t
s
t
o
p
u
b
l
i
c
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
a
n
d
ut
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
.
F3
4
P
e
r
r
y
N
o
r
r
i
s
pe
r
r
y
@
t
d
l
a
n
d
t
r
u
s
t
.
o
r
g
Ex
e
c
u
t
i
v
e
D
i
r
e
c
t
o
r
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
D
o
n
n
e
r
L
a
n
d
T
r
u
s
t
Ma
y
2
3
,
2
0
1
1
De
s
c
r
i
b
e
s
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
a
s
o
p
e
n
sp
a
c
e
;
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
s
s
i
t
e
a
s
i
m
p
o
r
t
a
n
t
to
V
e
r
d
i
d
e
e
r
h
e
r
d
;
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
s
CD
F
G
s
t
u
d
y
b
e
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
i
n
DE
I
R
.
31
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
R
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
E
I
R
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
a
n
y
on
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
n
t
h
e
T
o
w
n
o
f
T
r
u
c
k
e
e
f
r
o
m
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
0
3
t
o
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
1
CO
M
M
E
N
T
O
R
N
A
M
E
AN
D
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
Project Description
Aesthetics
Agriculture and Forestry
Air Quality
Biological Resources
Cultural Resources
Geology / Soils
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Hazards / Hazardous Materials
Hydrology / Water Quality
Land Use and Planning
Mineral Resources
Noise
Population / Housing
Public Services
Recreation
Transportation / Traffic
Utilities / Service Systems
Construction Impacts
Alternatives
Other
Requests to be Notified
SU
M
M
A
R
Y
O
F
CO
M
M
E
N
T
F3
5
S
a
b
i
n
e
E
n
d
r
i
s
s
&
K
e
i
t
h
C
a
r
r
10
8
2
2
W
h
i
t
e
h
o
r
s
e
R
o
a
d
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
1
Ma
y
2
3
,
2
0
1
1
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
p
o
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
;
wi
l
d
l
i
f
e
;
a
i
r
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
;
a
n
d
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
.
F3
6
S
a
n
d
y
K
o
r
t
h
17
1
6
4
V
a
l
l
e
y
V
i
e
w
R
o
a
d
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
1
Ma
y
2
3
,
2
0
1
1
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
h
a
z
a
r
d
s
;
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
i
n
G
l
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
ar
e
a
;
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
;
s
u
g
g
e
s
t
s
al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
;
i
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
da
m
a
g
e
o
v
e
r
t
i
m
e
;
e
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
s
;
wi
l
d
l
i
f
e
a
n
d
m
i
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
;
li
g
h
t
i
n
g
(
n
i
g
h
t
s
k
y
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
)
;
ai
r
p
o
r
t
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
t
o
n
e
w
re
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
;
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
p
h
a
s
i
n
g
;
gr
o
w
t
h
i
n
d
u
c
i
n
g
(
j
o
b
s
)
;
cu
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
o
f
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
.
F3
7
J
u
n
i
p
e
r
H
i
l
l
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
O
w
n
e
r
s
An
d
r
e
a
W
a
l
o
f
-
G
r
i
s
h
a
m
,
L
o
t
1
6
an
d
O
t
h
e
r
s
11
3
2
2
S
o
m
e
r
s
e
t
D
r
i
v
e
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
1
Ma
y
2
3
,
2
0
1
1
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
w
a
t
e
r
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
;
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
i
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
;
wi
l
d
l
i
f
e
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
;
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
o
f
l
i
f
e
;
la
n
d
u
s
e
z
o
n
i
n
g
;
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
zo
n
i
n
g
;
s
u
g
g
e
s
t
s
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
;
F3
8
R
o
n
n
i
e
C
o
l
b
y
Ro
n
i
e
.
c
o
l
b
y
@
g
m
a
i
l
.
c
o
m
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
Ma
y
2
3
,
2
0
1
1
Re
q
u
e
s
t
s
t
h
e
E
I
R
b
e
e
x
h
a
u
s
t
i
v
e
;
sp
e
c
i
f
i
c
a
l
l
y
c
o
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
tr
a
f
f
i
c
;
p
o
l
l
u
t
i
o
n
;
u
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
in
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
;
w
i
l
d
f
i
r
e
h
a
z
a
r
d
s
;
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
;
w
i
l
d
l
i
f
e
;
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
c
y
;
w
a
t
e
r
qu
a
l
i
t
y
;
e
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
s
.
32
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
R
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
E
I
R
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
a
n
y
on
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
n
t
h
e
T
o
w
n
o
f
T
r
u
c
k
e
e
f
r
o
m
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
0
3
t
o
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
1
CO
M
M
E
N
T
O
R
N
A
M
E
AN
D
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
Project Description
Aesthetics
Agriculture and Forestry
Air Quality
Biological Resources
Cultural Resources
Geology / Soils
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Hazards / Hazardous Materials
Hydrology / Water Quality
Land Use and Planning
Mineral Resources
Noise
Population / Housing
Public Services
Recreation
Transportation / Traffic
Utilities / Service Systems
Construction Impacts
Alternatives
Other
Requests to be Notified
SU
M
M
A
R
Y
O
F
CO
M
M
E
N
T
F3
9
N
a
n
c
y
R
i
c
h
a
r
d
s
PO
B
o
x
1
0
3
6
2
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
2
Ma
y
2
3
,
2
0
1
1
Re
q
u
e
s
t
s
a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
o
f
e
n
e
r
g
y
re
l
a
t
e
d
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
;
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
S
o
l
a
r
Ri
g
h
t
s
A
c
t
;
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
co
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
c
y
f
o
r
e
n
e
r
g
y
a
n
d
s
o
l
a
r
su
b
d
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
d
e
s
i
g
n
;
g
r
e
e
n
h
o
u
s
e
ga
s
e
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
s
;
F4
0
C
r
a
i
g
&
J
o
d
y
P
o
e
16
2
4
1
E
d
i
n
b
u
r
g
h
D
r
i
v
e
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
1
Ma
y
2
3
,
2
0
1
1
Re
q
u
e
s
t
s
a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
o
f
w
i
l
d
l
i
f
e
;
mi
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
s
a
n
d
h
a
b
i
t
a
t
;
wa
t
e
r
s
h
e
d
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
a
n
d
r
u
n
o
f
f
;
ec
o
n
o
m
i
c
s
;
s
c
h
o
o
l
s
;
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
a
n
d
ro
a
d
w
a
y
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
.
F4
1
J
a
n
e
t
S
i
l
v
e
r
17
0
8
6
G
l
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
D
r
i
v
e
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
1
Ma
y
2
3
,
2
0
1
1
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
o
n
e
e
n
t
r
y
po
i
n
t
,
s
a
f
e
t
y
,
h
a
z
a
r
d
s
a
n
d
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
im
p
a
c
t
s
;
e
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
s
.
F4
2
A
l
l
i
s
o
n
P
e
d
l
e
y
Ex
e
c
u
t
i
v
e
D
i
r
e
c
t
o
r
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
T
r
a
i
l
s
F
o
u
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
PO
B
o
x
1
7
5
1
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
0
Ma
y
2
3
,
2
0
1
1
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
t
r
a
i
l
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
;
co
n
n
e
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
;
a
c
c
e
s
s
i
b
i
l
i
t
y
;
w
a
t
e
r
qu
a
l
i
t
y
a
n
d
h
a
b
i
t
a
t
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
,
pe
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
a
n
d
b
i
k
e
s
a
f
e
t
y
;
im
p
a
c
t
s
t
o
s
c
h
o
o
l
s
a
f
e
t
y
;
al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
a
n
d
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
e
m
o
d
e
s
of
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
.
F4
3
D
o
n
a
n
d
A
r
l
i
n
e
M
o
r
r
i
s
o
n
16
2
2
2
E
d
i
n
b
u
r
g
h
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
1
Ma
y
2
3
,
2
0
1
1
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
o
n
na
r
r
o
w
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
;
w
i
l
d
l
i
f
e
a
n
d
mi
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
s
;
e
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
s
;
in
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
;
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
tr
a
f
f
i
c
r
e
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
h
i
p
t
o
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
o
f
li
f
e
;
s
c
h
o
o
l
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
33
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
R
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
E
I
R
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
a
n
y
on
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
n
t
h
e
T
o
w
n
o
f
T
r
u
c
k
e
e
f
r
o
m
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
0
3
t
o
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
1
CO
M
M
E
N
T
O
R
N
A
M
E
AN
D
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
Project Description
Aesthetics
Agriculture and Forestry
Air Quality
Biological Resources
Cultural Resources
Geology / Soils
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Hazards / Hazardous Materials
Hydrology / Water Quality
Land Use and Planning
Mineral Resources
Noise
Population / Housing
Public Services
Recreation
Transportation / Traffic
Utilities / Service Systems
Construction Impacts
Alternatives
Other
Requests to be Notified
SU
M
M
A
R
Y
O
F
CO
M
M
E
N
T
F4
4
K
r
i
s
K
u
y
p
e
r
Ma
y
2
3
,
2
0
1
1
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
of
i
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
o
c
c
u
r
r
i
n
g
w
i
t
h
ou
t
a
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
;
e
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
s
.
F4
5
A
l
e
x
a
n
d
e
r
H
e
y
m
a
n
15
2
2
3
C
h
a
t
h
a
m
R
e
a
c
h
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
1
Ma
y
2
3
,
2
0
1
1
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
tr
a
f
f
i
c
i
n
G
l
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
a
r
e
a
;
b
i
c
y
c
l
e
sa
f
e
t
y
;
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
o
f
l
i
f
e
;
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
c
y
wi
t
h
G
e
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
;
l
o
s
s
o
f
t
r
e
e
s
;
wi
l
d
l
i
f
e
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
a
n
d
w
i
l
d
l
i
f
e
;
a
i
r
qu
a
l
i
t
y
;
a
n
d
e
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
s
.
F4
6
K
a
r
e
n
U
n
r
e
i
n
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
9
6
1
6
1
Ma
y
2
3
,
2
0
1
1
Co
n
c
e
r
n
e
d
a
b
o
u
t
v
i
s
u
a
l
re
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
;
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
s
s
i
m
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
s
;
ai
r
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
;
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
;
wi
l
d
l
i
f
e
;
w
a
t
e
r
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
a
n
d
r
u
n
o
f
f
;
po
p
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
;
d
e
n
s
i
t
y
;
we
t
l
a
n
d
s
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
;
b
r
i
d
g
e
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
on
c
r
e
e
k
s
;
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
a
t
t
r
a
i
l
h
e
a
d
s
;
pu
b
l
i
c
r
e
s
t
r
o
o
m
s
;
e
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
ac
c
e
s
s
;
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
d
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
i
n
Gl
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
a
r
e
a
–
s
m
a
l
l
s
t
r
e
e
t
im
p
a
c
t
s
;
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
e
a
c
c
e
s
s
s
i
t
e
s
re
q
u
e
s
t
e
d
;
o
n
e
a
c
c
e
s
s
g
a
t
e
;
em
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
a
c
c
e
s
s
;
.
34
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
R
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
E
I
R
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
C
a
n
y
on
S
p
r
i
n
g
s
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
n
t
h
e
T
o
w
n
o
f
T
r
u
c
k
e
e
f
r
o
m
No
v
e
m
b
e
r
2
0
0
3
t
o
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
1
CO
M
M
E
N
T
O
R
N
A
M
E
AN
D
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
Project Description
Aesthetics
Agriculture and Forestry
Air Quality
Biological Resources
Cultural Resources
Geology / Soils
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Hazards / Hazardous Materials
Hydrology / Water Quality
Land Use and Planning
Mineral Resources
Noise
Population / Housing
Public Services
Recreation
Transportation / Traffic
Utilities / Service Systems
Construction Impacts
Alternatives
Other
Requests to be Notified
SU
M
M
A
R
Y
O
F
CO
M
M
E
N
T
F4
7
M
o
u
n
t
a
i
n
A
r
e
a
P
r
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
Fo
u
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
–
J
o
h
n
E
a
t
o
n
Sa
v
e
O
p
e
n
S
p
a
c
e
G
l
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
–
Le
i
g
h
G
o
l
d
e
n
Tr
u
c
k
e
e
,
C
A
Ma
y
2
3
,
2
0
1
1
Re
q
u
e
s
t
s
a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
o
f
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
a
t
va
r
i
o
u
s
t
i
m
e
s
o
f
y
e
a
r
;
s
u
g
g
e
s
t
s
lo
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
f
o
r
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
s
t
u
d
y
t
o
in
c
l
u
d
e
;
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
f
o
r
l
o
w
i
n
c
o
m
e
;
tr
a
i
l
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
t
o
s
t
r
e
a
m
s
;
re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
s
m
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
me
a
s
u
r
e
s
;
w
a
t
e
r
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
Gl
e
n
s
h
i
r
e
p
o
n
d
a
n
d
w
e
t
l
a
n
d
s
;
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
P
l
a
n
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
c
y
;
up
d
a
t
e
w
e
t
l
a
n
d
d
e
l
i
n
e
a
t
i
o
n
;
wi
l
d
l
i
f
e
a
n
d
m
i
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
;
na
t
i
v
e
v
e
g
e
t
a
t
i
o
n
;
l
i
g
h
t
a
n
d
n
o
i
s
e
im
p
a
c
t
s
;
t
r
e
e
r
e
m
o
v
a
l
;
b
e
a
r
ma
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
;
s
u
g
g
e
s
t
s
al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
;
e
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
ev
a
c
u
a
t
i
o
n
;
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
t
o
p
u
b
l
i
c
se
r
v
i
c
e
–
s
a
f
e
t
y
a
n
d
s
n
o
w
re
m
o
v
a
l
;
w
i
l
d
l
a
n
d
f
i
r
e
s
;
i
c
e
ha
z
a
r
d
s
;
w
a
t
e
r
s
u
p
p
l
y
;
in
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
;
u
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
;
e
n
e
r
g
y
;
vi
e
w
s
h
e
d
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
;
s
t
e
e
p
r
i
d
g
e
s
;
ea
r
t
h
q
u
a
k
e
f
a
u
l
t
s
;
e
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
s
;
cl
i
m
a
t
e
c
h
a
n
g
e
a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
;
c
u
l
t
u
r
a
l
re
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
;
N
A
H
C
c
o
n
s
u
l
t
a
t
i
o
n
;
re
g
i
o
n
a
l
r
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
;
cu
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e
i
m
p
a
c
t
s
f
r
o
m
ad
j
a
c
e
n
t
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
;
a
i
r
q
u
a
l
i
t
y
;
an
d
n
o
i
s
e
.
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
P
o
w
e
r
Po
i
n
t
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
a
b
o
u
t
V
M
T
th
r
e
s
h
o
l
d
.
........................................................................................................................
A. L ETTERS R ECEIVED I N
R ESPONSE T O T HE T AHOE B OCA
E STATES P ROJECT F ROM
N OVEMBER 2003 – J ULY 2004
........................................................................................................................
B. L ETTERS R ECEIVED I N
R ESPONSE OF T HE C ANYON
S PRINGS P ROJECT F ROM
M ARCH 2005 TO J ANUARY 2006
........................................................................................................................
C. L ETTERS R ECEIVED I N
R ESPONSE T O T HE N OTICE OF
P REPARATION OF T HE C ANYON
S PRINGS EIR D ATED
M ARCH 18, 2006
........................................................................................................................
D. L ETTERS R ECEIVED I N
R ESPONSE T O T HE
N OTICE O F A VAILABILITY OF
THE C ANYON S PRINGS EIR D ATED
A PRIL 24, 2007
........................................................................................................................
E. L ETTERS R ECEIVED I N
R ESPONSE T O T HE T OWN’S
P ROJECT R OUTING R EQUEST
P ROCESS FOR THE C ANYON
S PRINGS S UBDIVISION EIR
J ULY 2010
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH COUNTY OF NEVADA
Wesley Nicks, Director (530) 265-1464
Truckee Division (530) 582-7884
MEMORANDUM
To: Dennyelle Nishimori, Associate Planner
From: Janet Mann, Environmental Specialist IV
Date: August 24, 2010
Subject: TM-PD 10-016, Canyon Springs at Truckee, APN 49-020-17,18,19,20,21, East Side of Glenshire
Drive, Truckee, CA, Job #TOT10-005
BACKGROUND
The applicant is requesting approval for tentative map to subdivide six parcels totaling 283.76 acres into 185
single family parcels. Project is proposed to be on public water and sewer.
WATER QUALITY
There are no known water quality issues at this site.
RISK OF UPSET/HEALTH HAZARDS
The project is not within but is adjacent to any abandoned solid waste disposal site that is known to this
department.
This department has no objection to approval of the subject project. No conditions or comments are
recommended.
Additional fees may be incurred and/or required for some or all additional services rendered by this
department in regard to this project, including review of compliance with conditions and/or mitigation
measures. Said fees will be in accordance with the latest adopted fee resolution.
From:SR Jones
To:Denyelle Nishimori
Cc:"elliot@emulberg.com"
Subject:Canyon Springs - NOP
Date:Monday, May 02, 2011 4:12:41 PM
Hello Denyelle
Thank you for sending LAFCo the Notice of Preparation for the Canyon Springs
Subdivision EIR. I trust this informal e-mail response will be sufficient; if you would like a more
formal letter, please let me know.
As the NOP correctly notes, LAFCo will be a Responsible Agency for annexation of the
project to the Truckee Donner Public Utility District for treated water service. Although
TDPUD also provides electrical service, it appears the project area is within the service area
of NV Energy (I believe that the NV service area was recently purchased by Liberty Energy).
LAFCo is preparing an update to the sphere of influence of the Truckee Donner PUD.
For this reason, the schedules for (1) project approval (including preparation of the EIR) and
(2) development phasing is of interest. Our consultant has recommended positioning the
project area in the TDPUD Long-term sphere, indicating development (and need for the
TDPUD’s service) is at least five years away. If your information indicates that project
approvals and development will occur sometime in the next five years, please advise.
In addition, LAFCo will use the EIR’s information on various public services and utilities,
including wastewater, fire protection and emergency response, and recreation services. The
Notice of Preparation indicates that Truckee Sanitary District will be providing wastewater
service; as you probably are aware, Tahoe Truckee Sanitation Agency will also be involved as
it operates the treatment plant. Therefore, the service capacity/availability of the TTSA
system should also be considered in the EIR.
If you have any questions or comments, please
SR Jones
Executive Officer, Nevada LAFCo
530-265-7180
NCLAFCo.com
State ofCalifornia -The Natural Resources Agency EDMUND G.BROWN.Jr.Governor
DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME JOHNMcCAMMAN,Director
1701 Nimbus Road,Suite A
Rancho Cordova,CA 95670
(916)358-2900
http://www.dfg.ca.gov
May 23,2011
Denyelle Nishimori
Associate Planner
Truckee Community Development Department
10183 Truckee Airport Road
Truckee,CA 96161
FAX (530)582-7710
Dear Ms.Nishimori:
The Department of Fish and Game (Department)has reviewed the Notice of Preparation
of the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR)for the Canyon Springs Subdivision
(project).The project proposes subdivision of about 284 acres into 185 residential lots,
including about 175 acres of open space.
The EIR should describe all the fish and wildlife resources that may occur in and around
the project site.This description should include the extent,location and types of habitat,
concentration areas,un-fragmented blocks of habitat,and wildlife movement corridors.
The EIR should describe the project's direct and indirect impacts to these habitats and to
specific fish and wildlife resources and provide the specific measures to be implemented to
fully mitigate the impacts.Of particular concern to the Department on this project site are
impacts to habitat and movement corridors for the Verdi subunit of the Loyalton-Truckee
deer herd.Habitat impacts resulting from residential development and recreational use
are currently the biggest concern for the future of this deer herd.
We recommend the document address in detail the project's impact upon significant
habitat such as wetlands,vernal pools and riparian areas.The project should be
designed so that impacts to wetlands are avoided.We recommend that permanent
wetlands should be protected by no less than 100-foot setback buffer areas,and that
intermittent streams and swales protected by no less than a 50-foot non-building setback
buffer.Buffers should extend around riparian habitats,and areas within them protected
from dumping or habitat alteration through covenants,codes and restrictions.Mitigation
should be provided for unavoidable impacts based upon the concept of no-net-loss of
wetland habitat values or acreage.
In addition,the document should address the project's impact to special status
species including species which are State and federal listed as threatened and
endangered;the project's growth inducing and cumulative impacts upon fish,
wildlife,water quality and vegetativeresources;and provide an analysis of specific
alternatives which reduce impacts to fish,wildlife,water quality and vegetative
resources.
Conserving California's Wildlife Since 1870
Ms.Nishimori 2 May 23,2011
The Department recommends that the document analyze the project's potential to
contribute to negative wildlife/human interactions such as vehicle collisions,
nuisance wildlife complaints,and depredation.The EIR should provide the means
to minimizing such impacts through changes in project design or other means
such as the use of covenant's codes and restrictions to ensure use of bear-proof
trash receptacles.
Also,the document should consider and analyze whether implementation of the proposed
project will result in reasonably foreseeable,potentiallysignificant impacts subject to
regulation by the DFG under Section 1600 et seq.of the Fish and Game Code.In general,
such impacts result whenever a proposed project involves work undertaken in or near a
river,stream,or lake that flows at least intermittently through a bed or channel,including
ephemeral streams and water courses.Impacts triggering regulation by the DFG under
these provisions of theFish and Game Code typically result from activities that impact the
bed,bank or channel of a lake or stream.
This project will have an impact to fish and/or wildlife habitat.Assessment of fees under
Public Resources Code Section 21089 and as defined by Fish and Game Code Section
711.4 is necessary.Fees are payable by the project applicant upon filing of theNotice of
Determination by the lead agency.
Pursuant to Public Resources Code Sections 21092 and 21092.2,the DFG requests
written notification of proposed actions and pending decisions regarding this project.
Written notifications should be directed to this office.
Thank you for the opportunity to review thisproject.If the DFG can be of further
assistance please contact Ms.Julie Newman,Staff Environmental Scientist at (530)
283-6866.
Sincerely,
j Ma
Jeff Drongesen
Environmental Program Manager
ec:Sara Holm
Kevin Thomas
Julie Newman
From: Denyelle Nishimori [mailto:DNishimori@townoftruckee.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 9:17 PM
To: Terri McCracken
Subject: FW: Canyon Springs EIR Scoping Comment #1
Denyelle
Denyelle N. Nishimori, AICP
Associate Planner, Town of Truckee
10183 Truckee Airport Road. Truckee, CA 96162
Ph: 530-582-2934 (direct)/ Fx: 530-582-7710
From: Kristi Thompson [mailto:kristi@mwa-truckee.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 5:15 PM
To: Denyelle Nishimori
Subject: Canyon Springs EIR
Hi Danielle,
In response to the Canyon Springs notice I just got in my email, I'm sending this suggestion for the EIR scope.
I'd like to request that the traffic study, looking at "Peak" loads for the Canyon Springs EIR be conducted during a
school day between 7am and 9:30am and between 3pm and 7pm when the neighborhood of Glenshire sees it's
most traffic during the year. The last DEIR traffic study I saw for this project, was done in the middle of summer.
This makes sense for downtown Truckee, and probably for Tahoe Donner, where vacationers and second home
owners create peak traffic loads. This does not make sense for Glenshire which is very primarily a locals
neighborhood. There is definitely less traffic around Glenshire during summer and during school breaks.
Thank you for your consideration,
Kristi
Kristin E. Thompson,
Principal Architect
MWA, Inc. Architecture - Engineering
www.mwa-truckee.com
11165 Brockway Rd, Suite 1
Truckee, CA 96161
Telephone 530-587-6257 x22
Facsimile 530-587-0761
The information in this e-mail (including attachments, if any) is considered confidential and is intended only for the recipient(s) listed above. Any review, use,
disclosure, distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited except by the intended recipient. If you have received this email in error, please notify me immediately by
reply email, delete this email, and do not disclose its contents to anyone. Any attached work product is considered an instrument of service and property of and
copyright ownership by MWA Inc. Thank you.
Page 1of 1
4/25/2011
From: jean brooks [mailto:jandgbrooks@yahoo.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2011 3:38 PM
To: Denyelle Nishimori
Subject: EIR Canyon Springs Development
Hello Danielle, I attended the meeting on May 4th at the town hall and I made 2
comments. I also need to state, to the EIR agency and to the Town of Truckee planners,
my general feelings about the Canyon Springs development. Looking at the big picture
for responsible and smart development for our region, it does not make sense to
intentionally develop an area far from town and services. As we are aware, all of the
people who live in a development 8-10 miles from town will be driving vehicles
everyday west into Truckee, because there are no other options. There is no public
transportation and no safe bike routes. I understand that the owners have a right to
develop their property (even if they lose money on it and leave us with blacktop roads
where there was once open space, and dilapidated for sale signs i.e. Elkhorn Ridge). So
besides my extreme concern about traffic on Glenshire roads, the destruction of wetlands
and wildllife habitat, I worry that the town is not truly looking at an alternative for this
project. I remember that this parcel was rejected for development , other than 20 acre
parcels, many years ago. I don't know when the zoning changed. One option, that may
have been looked at, is to offer the owners a land swap closer to town, so that we don't
end up with an even larger population in Truckee dependent on their personal vehicles to
get around. I wish the US Forest Service had some property to swap, since Truckee is
surrounded by it.
I have been a Truckee resident for 25 years. I have a bad feeling about this Canyon
Springs project. I feel it's not well thought out for Glenshire OR the Town of Truckee.
Thank you for considering my comments.
Jean Brooks
10468 Evensham
Truckee,CA 96161
From: Rksrat@aol.com [mailto:Rksrat@aol.com]
Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2011 11:48 AM
To: Denyelle Nishimori
Subject: Canyon Springs
Hello,
I had written you before concerning the past proposal for Canyon Springs. Since we now have
new owners that are moving along without your approval, we need to address the serious
concerns again.
As a Meadows resident, my main concern is the blind intersection (by DMV definition) at
Whitehorse Rd. and Glenshire Drive. I deal with it daily, not being able to see cars coming up the
hill in the tight S-turn. More traffic will surely cause a serious accident some day. Also, more cars
at this location, will surely add to the already dangerous conditions, that exist, when there is snow
on this steep potion of the road in the winter time.
Secondly, there must not be an access through Edinburgh in Glenshire. The streets are to
narrow there for additional traffic. Also, this is a very active family neighborhood, with kids and
dogs playing in the streets with their parents. It is not practical or safe to sent additional traffic
through this area.
When I moved here in 1981, Glenshire drive was a main through fare with the portion from town
being 55 mph. The road in our subdivision was 35 mph all the way through. Now, due to
increased traffic from building additional homes, from town it is now 45 mph. In the subdivision, it
is now 30 mph to 25 mph as the road narrows on this end. If you approve this project in it's size,
the speed limit from town will have to be reduced to 35 mph and in the Glenahsire area 25 to 15
mph. That reduction shows the negative impact more cars will have.
We already have too many empty subdivisions in Truckee to allow any more to be built. We have
two sitting empty here in Glenahsire, not to mention Greys Crossing and the area behind the
middle school. The supply and demand is already up set and approving more, will just ad to an
already hurting economic area.
,
As for the wild life, this development is right in the middle of the migration path for the Mule deer.
Not to mention, the mountain lions, bobcats, raccoons, porcupines, rabbits, quail, sage grouse,
squires and of course the bears. I have witnessed all of these many times out here. They were all
here first and have been disrupted enough by our development.
Suggestions for mitigation are: Straighten out the S curve at the top of Glenshire drive and
reduce the 9% road slope in that area. Widen Glenshire drive from Hirschdale all the way to town
and provide a bike lane of considerable width to reduce traffic through alternative transportation.
The best mitigation is to sell the property to the land trust and stop depleting our natural
resources are Truckee.
Thanks for accepting my input.
If you have any questions or need more info, feel free to contact me at
rksrar@aol.com
Rick Seegmiller
11716 Whitehorse rd.
Truckee, California 96161
775-771-3407
Martha Frantz
17073 Glenshire Dr
Truckee CA, 96161
530‐582‐1626
Denyelle Nishimori
Truckee Planning Department
Truckee, CA
May 18, 2011
I am writing to express concerns about the proposed Canyon Springs development and requesting that
these concerns be addressed during the EIR process.
My concerns involve:
• Traffic on Glenshire Drive
• Wildlife/Deer corridors
• Seasonal wetland impacts
• Economic impact on existing Glenshire Homeowners
Traffic:
Regardless which direction the proposed development funnels traffic out of Martis Peak Road the
only alternative is to access Glenshire Drive – either “uphill” or “downhill”. While I realize that the
“downhill” option moves traffic onto a portion of road that is managed by Nevada County, to the road
users this is a moot point. It is incontrovertible that the roadway will be used by both Glenshire
residents & their service providers. Regardless, traffic on a significant length through residential areas
along Glenshire Drive will be increased.
• What mitigation is proposed for this?
Wildlife/Deer Corridors
There is a current deer migration study in progress. Already the new (2010) fencing along Martis
Peak Road has affected this study by channeling deer toward Glenshire Drive. It is well documented by
both the states of California & Nevada that wildlife (esp. mule deer) habitats are endangered by
developments. If value is placed on preserving native mule deer populations in the Sierra Nevada area, it
seems illogical that impediments to traditional mule deer ranges changes would be allowed.
• What sustainable and scientifically defensible mitigations for the altered mule deer migration
pathways are proposed?
Seasonal Wetlands
The proposed Canyon Springs development involves bridging seasonal wetlands/springs. The Truckee
River corridor is highly susceptible to sediment runoff. While current construction regulations do
provide prevention to sediment outflow, there is a reasonable concern about how ongoing protection
will be managed once homes are built in areas that have the potential for sediment runoff.
• What mitigation is proposed for ongoing, sustainable prevention of sediment outflow?
Economic Impact
Since incorporation, The Truckee area has been a mix of second‐home owners & year‐round residents.
Traditionally the “local” residents have lived (happily) in smaller homes while the “visitors” have
purchased larger, more expensive lodges. With the recent real estate downturn there is a glut on the
market of upscale homes and properties. Canyon Springs admits to catering to the second home
owners. This can only serve to further drive down home values for all. How will local residents wishing
to sell their homes compete in a home market that discounts even luxury homes during a stagnant
market?
• What mitigation measures are available to local homeowners who see their home values
continuing to plummet?
Thank you for facilitating this community input.
Sincerely
Martha Frantz
05‐18‐2011
From:nocheinmalbitte@netzero.com
To:Denyelle Nishimori
Subject:Comment regarding Canyon Springs Development
Date:Friday, May 20, 2011 8:46:03 AM
May 20, 2011
Denyelle Nishimori
Associate Planner
Town of Truckee Planning Commission
dnishimori@townoftruckee.com
Dear Associate Planner Denyelle Nishimori:
My family and I live in a residence located on Glenshire Drive, near the intersection of Glenshire Drive
and The Strand. While I don’t have specific data, I would guess that approximately one-half of the
Glenshire/Devonshire/Cambridge Estates/The Meadows/Juniper Hills vehicular traffic traveling to and
from town passes by my home each day. This number increases when drivers from Reno chose to
avoid the agriculture inspection station on highway 80—especially noticeable on snow days.
The speed limit along Glenshire Drive in front of my home is 30mph, which is rarely adhered to. It is
my opinion that even with the current traffic load(s) on Glenshire Drive, traffic is often high and
dangerous for pedestrians, homeowners, and bicyclists. I and my family must take extreme care
during snow-removal days at the foot of our driveway because of the heavy and fast-moving traffic.
One quarter of a mile from my home, towards town, near the Glenshire Store, the traffic load
essentially doubles where all traffic from the Glenshire area merges.
It is my understanding that the additional 204 units proposed in the Canyon Springs Development
would also use this already well-used portion of Glenshire Drive. I do not believe the Canyon Springs
Development should move forward until a comprehensive and realistic plan is formulated to provide for
an alternative travel route accessing this development other than Glenshire Drive.
Respectfully Yours,
Michael Ketron
15257 Glenshire Drive
Truckee, CA 96161
530-582-4811
____________________________________________________________
Penny Stock Jumping 3000%
Sign up to the #1 voted penny stock newsletter for free today!
http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL3231/4dd68c3585ed144468st02duc
From: Janet Feick [mailto:janetfeick@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2011 1:52 PM
To: Denyelle Nishimori
Subject: Canyon Springs
Dear Ms. Nishimori,
As a Glenshire resident, I am solidly in favor of the Canyon Springs development for the following
reasons:
1. The development could add traffic mitigating measures such as the proposed idea of
a roundabout at the intersection of Glenshire and Dorchester at the South entrance. ( I
volunteered on the traffic mitigating committee a few years back and this was on the table as well
as speed reducing measures for some of the high traffic roadways, both of which would be
positive additions, even without Canyon Springs.)
2. The development will add numbers to the Glenshire population thus intriguing potential
businesses and making a case for developing Knights Crossing. (Previously there has been
difficulty getting businesses, especially a restaurant operation, to commit because of the low
number of residents and therefore no guarantee of enough revenue for long term viability, so this
project has stalled, frustrating the majority of Glenshire residents.)
3. The development will bring more people and more tax revenue to the town to enable, if
managed correctly, a sustainable budget which will hopefully will be used for needed
upgrades downtown that have been deferred because of lack of resources..I am
speaking directly to the ridiculous painting of the sidewalk from commercial row to
Brickletown which should have never been considered (it’s already worn off) and instead
should have been done right the first time with unit pavers appropriate for longevity and
conveying the right look for our downtown. We are going to need resources to keep the
existing merchants well visited when the Holiday project is completed and this is going to
mean a serious overhaul to the existing pedestrian corridor . We need to start gathering
and saving for our future or the downtown will be so shabby it will look like West River
does now compared to the newness of Holiday’s section.
4. The development of Canyon Springs is not development for development’s sake. It is
part of the general plan originally laid out when Glenshire Devonshire was conceived and
we need to build on that rather than break new ground in areas non adjacent to areas of
similar use. It makes good sense from a planning perspective and it makes good sense
from a business perspective, even if it doesn’t make good sense from an emotional
perspective. That is why the people in charge are educated planners and not emotional
nimbies. Please put the radical 2% aside and look at what is good for the majority, even
if the majority is not as vocal or litigious.
Thank you for considering my opinion, Sincerely,
Janet Feick
From: Valerie Green [mailto:valeriegreenre@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2011 2:27 PM
To: Denyelle Nishimori
Subject: canyon springs
Dear Ms. Nishimori,
As a Glenshire resident, I am solidly in favor of the Canyon Springs development for the following
reasons:
1. The project is zoned for this use and should be allowed to go forward based on the
zoning. The development could add traffic mitigating measures such as the proposed idea of
a roundabout at the intersection of Glenshire and Dorchester at the South entrance. We need
additional developer fees to help maintain the roads and improve the traffic patterns.
2. The development will add numbers to the Glenshire population thus intriguing potential
businesses and making a case for developing Knights Crossing. (Previously there has been
difficulty getting businesses, especially a restaurant operation, to commit because of the low
number of residents and therefore no guarantee of enough revenue for long term viability, so
this project has stalled, frustrating the majority of Glenshire residents.)
3. The development will bring more people and more tax revenue to the town to enable, if
managed correctly, a sustainable budget which will hopefully will be used for needed
upgrades downtown that have been deferred because of lack of resources. Why was the
town allowed to paint pedestrian crosswalks when developers were mandated by the
planning department to only use brick pavers for same? We need to start gathering and
saving for our future or the downtown will deteriorate and look like West River Street.
4. The development of Canyon Springs is not development for development’s sake. It is
part of the general plan originally laid out when Glenshire Devonshire was conceived and
we need to build on that rather than break new ground in areas non adjacent to areas of
similar use. It makes good sense from a planning perspective and it makes good sense
from a business perspective, even if it doesn’t make good sense from an emotional
perspective. That is why the people in charge are educated planners and not emotional
nimbies. Please put the radical 2% aside and look at what is good for the majority, even
if the majority is not as vocal or litigious.
Thank you for considering my opinion.
Sincerely,
K. Valerie Green, Real Estate Specialist
TRUCKEE REALTY BROKERS
10098 Jibboom Street # 202
Truckee, CA 96161
530-587-0822
valeriegreenRE@gmail.com
DRE# 00996040
MARTIS PEA OCIATION K HOMEOWNERS ASS
TR 0
P. O. BOX 1431
UCKEE,CA 9616
(530) 587‐8647
May 20, 2011
Denyelle Nishimiori
ent Dept.
Associate Planner
Developm
ort Road
Truckee Community
0183 Truckee Airp1
Truckee, CA 96161
Re: Canyon Springs Development
The Martis Peak Homeowners Association “MPHOA” is a road association, and
therefore has concerns and questions related to our road, Martis Peak and the
roposed Canyon Springs development. The MPHOA Board requests that the Town
nclude focus on the following areas in the Environmental Impact Study.
p
i
Traffic
On July 25, 2010, the MPHOA sent a letter to the Town expressing our concerns over
traffic related to the proposed Canyon Springs development. The only entrance to
our development, Martis Peak Road., would be shared as the only access to the new
development. That concern is still a major one for us. While there are currently
approximately 200 trips per day on Martis Peak Road off Glenshire Drive, depending
on the number of multi‐family dwellings and secondary dwellings on the proposed
185 lots, this number will increase dramatically. We request that the Town study
the impact of the increased traffic at that intersection as well as along the section of
Glenshire Drive between Hirschdale and Martis Peak Road. This is a section of road
that is already difficult in winter and has seen many issues related to drivers
travelling with excessive speed throughout the year. Traffic studies should also
include potential additional development in the area, specifically in the adjacent
eel (Raley’s) property. MPHOA requests an opportunity to review and comment
n all related raffic studies.
T
o t
Public Safety
We ask that the Town consider the impact of the increasing density and limited
access/exit options for residents in Glenshire, The Meadows, Martis Peak, Canyon
Springs and adjacent areas in the case of an emergency such as a wildfire. We ask
that careful study be given to the ability of residents to escape in the worst case
scenario, as well as the ability of emergency personal to gain access to the area.
When the last major wildfire hit the area, it forced the closure of I80. How would a
similar scenario impact access/exit with an additional 185+ households using
M
i
artis Peak Road only? We also request that due examination be given to any
ncreased danger of wildfire during and after construction.
OnGoing Construction
The Canyon Springs plan has called for multiple phases (8) over a long period of
time (up to 20 years). We are concerned about the long‐term impact on our road
from the constant use by heavy equipment and contractor trucks. How will road
uality and our safety be addressed for those of us who will be neighbors to the q
development?
e appreciate your consideration of these noted concerns.
W
The Martis Peak Homeowners Association Board of Directors
raig Wilson, Nicole Reitter, Michelle Jones, Al Hall, Neil Blumenfield C
Neil Pankler
17073 Glenshire Drive
Truckee, CA 96161
Denyelle Nishimori
Town of Truckee
Planning Department
May 20, 2011
I am writing with concerns that I have regarding the Canyon Springs development that I would like to be
addressed in the upcoming EIR.
Density
It is my understanding that there could be two residences at each of the 185 lots that will be
offered for sale if the project is approved.
What mitigation is planned for the future increase in density?”
Traffic
The traffic impact report should take into account the maximum number of allowed residences.
It should include not only the commuter/service traffic but also the noise/visual pollution of off
highway vehicles ( dirt bikes, quads, etc) that have become so popular in this area.
Glenshire Drive is a hazardous road during the winter commute hours. An EIR traffic study done
on dry road conditions would indicate that the road could safely handle more traffic than the
same road could during winter conditions.
What mitigation is planned for these seasonal variations?
Cost to existing residents
Once the roads go into Canyon Springs they need to be maintained. Who will be paying for the
winter road plowing, road & other infrastructure maintenance until the development is sold‐
out?
What mitigation is planned to defray the cost to existing homeowners?
Thank you for your help.
Neil Pankler
05‐20‐2011
Denyelle Nishimori, Associate Planner May 20, 2011
Truckee Community Development Dept.
10183 Truckee Airport Road
Truckee, CA 96161
R.E. NOP of EIR proposed Canyon Springs 10-016/TM
This letter has been approved by the Glenshire Devonshire Residents Association Board of Directors who
represent the owners of 1,357 parcels with a 80% year round occupancy rate. The Glenshire area is
contiguous to this proposed development and is down stream of traffic and water flows and as such stands
to have the highest potential impact to the largest group of people.
The following are some of the concerns that have high impacts and mitigation of these areas needs to be
addressed in this process:
Traffic:
How will it be addressed that all construction traffic may not access Canyon Springs through the
residential area of Glenshire? Construction traffic in particular has a large impact on air, noise and
visual pollution as well as making the roads unsafe for pedestrian and bicycle use.
A need for a solution to Donner Pass road and Glenshire Drive issue. (already can be impacted at
certain times (7am to 9am normal schedule school days, 3pm to 6 pm weekdays) Line site and
speed on Donner Pass East bound are a particular concern.
How to prevent safety issues at Dorchester Drive and Glenshire Drive (both East and West
intersections)
How to prevent safety issues at White Horse and Glenshire Drive (line site, speed)
A need to address Glenshire Drive from White Horse to Highway 80. (narrow width of this road
combined with sharp turns and steep grade is not conducive for increased traffic)
�� W o u l d t h e i n c r e a s e i n t r a f f i c d i s c o u r a g e a l t e r n a t i v e t r a n s p o r t a t i o n s u c h a s b i c y c l e s a n d o r w a l k i n g
a n d h o w w o u l d t h i s i s s u e b e m i t i g a t e d ? ( G H G s , a i r q u a l i t y , v i s u a l a n d n o i s e i m p a c t o f a d d i t i o n a l
t r a f f i c )
�� H o w w o u l d t h e S a f e t y o f B i c y c l e a n d p e d e s t r i a n t r a f f i c d u e t o i n c r e a s e d t r a f f i c b e a d d r e s s e d ?
( P o s s i b l y a c l a s s 2 b i k e l a n e s o n G l e n s h i r e D r i v e t h r o u g h t h e G l e n s h i r e s u b d i v i s i o n a n d
D o r c h e s t e r D r i v e ? )
�� D u e t o t h e n a r r o w n e s s o f t h e S o m e r s e t / C o u r t e n a y / R e g e n c y a n d e s p e c i a l l y E d i n b u r g h D r i v e a n y
a d d i t i o n a l t r a f f i c w o u l d b e a s a f e t y i s s u e .
H o w i s E d i n b u r g h p l a n e d t o b e k e p t a s a n e m e r g e n c y g a t e r e m a i n c l o s e d t o a l l m o t o r v e h i c l e t r a f f i c
e x c e p t E m e r g e n c y v e h i c l e s i n P e r p e t u i t y ?
�� W h a t a r e t h e i m p a c t s t o t h e e m e r g e n c y e v a c u a t i o n p l a n f o r t h e G l e n s h i r e a r e a ? I s a n u p d a t e d
E m e r g e n c y e v a c u a t i o n p l a n g o i n g t o b e i n c l u d e d ?
�� W h a t a r e t h e c u r r e n t t r a f f i c L e v e l o f S e r v i c e ?
�� W h a t a r e t h e p r o j e c t e d t r a f f i c L O S u p o n f u l l o c c u p a t i o n o f a l l e x i s t i n g l o t s a c c e s s e d b y G l e n s h i r e
D r i v e ? ( i n c l u d i n g E l k h o r n R i d g e a n d T h e B l u f f s )
�� W h a t w i l l t h e t r a f f i c L O S b e a f t e r f u l l o c c u p a t i o n o f C a n y o n S p r i n g s ? O n G l e n s h i r e D r i v e ? A t K e y
i n t e r s e c t i o n s d u r i n g p e a k t r a f f i c f l o w s ? ( W e e k d a y s d u r i n g n o r m a l s c h o o l s c h e d u l e w i t h i n c l e m e n t
w e a t h e r 7 a m t o 9 a m a n d 3 p m t o 6 p m )
H y d r o l o g y a n d W a t e r Q u a l i t y i m p a c t s :
�� H o w a r e t h e i m p a c t s o f d e v e l o p m e n t a n d i n c r e a s e d l a n d u s e b y a l a r g e r p o p u l a t i o n i n t h i s p r o p o s e d
d e v e l o p m e n t g o i n g t o i m p a c t t h e w a t e r q u a l i t y , r i p a r i a n h a b i t a t s , a n d s e d i m e n t s t h a t f l o w i n t o t h e
G l e n s h i r e L a k e ? G l e n s h i r e H O A w o u l d l i k e t o s e e t h e e n t i r e c o u r s e o f t h e m a i n d r a i n a g e f r o m t h e
p r o p o s e d d e v e l o p m e n t t o t h e G l e n s h i r e L a k e s t u d i e d w i t h p o s s i b l e m i t i g a t i o n r e q u i r e m e n t s t o i n c l u d e
t h i s e n t i r e s e c t i o n i n c l u d i n g t h e p o n d . H a s t h e p o s s i b l y o f w o r k i n g w i t h T r u c k e e R i v e r W a t e r s h e d
C o u n c i l o n i n c r e a s i n g t h e h e a l t h o f t h i s w a t e r s h e d .
�� H o w a r e t h e c o n c e r n s w i t h a n y p r o p e r t i e s t h a t a r e d o w n h i l l o f t h e d e v e l o p m e n t w i t h p o s s i b l e
i n c r e a s e d w a t e r s h e d ? I n p a r t i c u l a r t h e r e a r e f l o o d i n g c o n c e r n s w i t h p r o p e r t i e s a l o n g S o u t h E a s t e r n
G l e n s h i r e D r i v e .
Population and Housing:
How are concerns with increased population and traffic over the initial proposed amounts if residents
area allowed to build secondary units, or turn their homes into duplexes? Would there be
restrictions against such practices?
Wildlife:
What are the impacts to wildlife and particular the deer herd?
How are the impacts of vehicle and human traffic being addressed in the planned area as well as the
surrounding areas?
Other areas of concern:
What will the accumulated impacts of a project planed over 8 years be?
What will the impacts on the basic services (police, fire, sewer, water, school, school bussing, snow
removal etc) be?
How will the increased need for snow removal be funded?
How is the issue of environmental impacts due to “ghost streets” (roads with no residents and the
associated dumping, illegal off road access and mischievous behavior) going to be addressed?
How will the current view shed be changed?
At the direction of the Glenshire Devonshire Board Of Directors
Dan Warren
General Manager
Glenshire Devonshire Residents Association
15726 Glenshire Drive
Truckee, CA 96161
530-587-6202
From:Eric Martin
To:Denyelle Nishimori
Subject:re: Canyon Springs comment.
Date:Friday, May 20, 2011 7:32:38 PM
I am writing this letter to you to state that I am totally and completly OPPOSED tothe Canyon springs development. The LAST thing Truckee needs is more real estatedevelopment. We have a glut of real estate in this area, and Canyon springs will onlymake it worse. Traffic congestion and wildlife will be adversely affected by this.Please let me know what else I can do to stop this development.
Sincerely,
-- Eric Martin
eemartin101@gmail.com
530-305-5534
From:john Black
To:Denyelle Nishimori
Subject:Canyon Springs
Date:Saturday, May 21, 2011 5:58:14 PM
Dear Denyelle,
I am writing in opposition to another rediculous project in Truckee. Canyon
Springs, the former TahoeBoca estates project, is yet another example of greedy
developement attempting to destroy our town, our wildlife corridor, our open
space, and our lives in the interest of making a buck. But in this case, like it
was in years previous, it is most disheartening to see the people in our town
hall thinking of approving this stupid, yes it is stupid, project. The most
recent project in this area, Cambridge five, destroyed open space to create lots
for homes. Currently, the first home built four years ago now, is not sold. In
fact it never sold. 5 homes have been built and the rest were in bankruptcy. The
area had more use when nothing was on it than it has since. How many projects do
we need to have in bankruptcy in this town. How many empty subdivisions are
needed. When you destroyed the water table in Prosser with Greys Crossing, did
you people feel any guilt? You did it and if I lived there you would have heard
much louder cries for foul and a law suit that would never end. If it happens
again here, I will empty my wallet to make you and the developers pay and keep
paying. This area is miles from town. The access will be on a steep grade. The
homes will be as close to tract homes as can be done here, please...do we really
need them. I know you will approve it anyway but at least I have said my peace.
Since becoming a town, Truckee has shown us that the new wealthy can buy what
they wish, even if it only serves their pocket books. How about making them foot
the bill for the new pool facilities at the Rec Center. At least that would show
us you care about the taxpayers a little bit.
May 23, 2011
Denyelle Nishimori
ent Dept.
Associate Planner
Developm
ort Road
Truckee Community
0183 Truckee Airp1
Truckee, CA 96161
Re: EIR for Canyon Springs Development
I am a Martis Peak property owner and Martis Peak Homeowners Association
“MPHOA” director, as well as a homeowner in Glenshire. The MPHOA is a road
association, thus the MPHOA Board felt their comments should be limited to the
roads (reference the MPHOA Board’s letter of May 23, 2011). Though I am speaking
as an individual property owner and not on the behalf of the MPHOA, I am confident
that I speak for a number of Martis Peak property owners that our concerns around
the Canyon Springs development go far beyond roads and traffic to the impact of
this development on the lifestyle we sought when coming to the Truckee area. We
equest that the Town carefully consider the following issues in the EIR for Canyon
prings.
r
S
Traffic
On July 25, 2010, Craig Wilson of the MPHOA, sent a letter to the Town expressing
our concerns over traffic related to the proposed Canyon Springs development. The
only entrance to our development, Martis Peak Road, would be shared as the only
access to the new development. That concern is still a major one for us. While there
are currently approximately 200 trips per day on Martis Peak Road off Glenshire
Drive, depending on the number of multi‐family dwellings and secondary dwellings
on the proposed 185 lots, this number will increase dramatically. We request that
the Town study the impact of the increased traffic at that intersection as well as
along the section of Glenshire Drive between Hirschdale and Martis Peak Road. This
is a section of road that is already difficult in winter and has seen many issues
related to drivers travelling with excessive speed throughout the year. Traffic
studies should also include potential additional development in the area, specifically
n the adjacent Teel (Raley’s) property, which appears to already be in the planning
tage.
i
s
Public Safety
We ask that the Town consider the impact of the increasing density and limited
access/exit options for residents in Glenshire, The Meadows, Martis Peak, Canyon
Springs and adjacent areas in the case of an emergency such as a wildfire. We ask
that careful study be given to the ability of residents to escape in the worst case
scenario, as well as the ability of emergency personnel to gain access to the area.
When the last major wildfire hit the area, it forced the closure of I‐80. How would a
similar scenario impact access/exit with an additional 185+ households using
Glenshire Drive only? We also request that due examination be given to any
increased danger of wildfire during and after construction.
OnGoing Construction
The Canyon Springs plan has called for multiple phases (8) over a long period of
time (up to 20 years). We are concerned about the long‐term impact on road quality
from the constant use by heavy equipment and trucks as well as a potential 20
summers of construction noise from the area. What will be the impacts of noise,
debris and construction equipment on those of us who will be neighbors to the
development?
Open Space
The Town has historically promoted the continued availability of open space.
Recognizing that the Canyon Springs land is private property, the development will
eliminate a large amount of what is currently perceived as open space by residents
of Glenshire and adjacent neighborhoods. The area has been popular for hiking,
biking and skiing and there are simply not a lot of alternatives in the area. We
equest that the Town determine the impact of the development on land available
or recreational use by Truckee area residents.
r
f
Wildlife Migration
The California Department of Fish and Game along with the Nevada Department of
Wildlife have embarked on a study of Mule Deer migration to assess the impact of
the project on a herd that has already been hit hard by development, drought and
wildfire. Their initial data will be available in 2012. We suggest that in no case
should this development proceed in advance of those findings being made available
to the Town.
Carbon Neutral Development
It is time for Truckee and Nevada County to take the lead in environmentally
conscious development. The idea of carbon neutral development is becoming a
reality in communities across the US and Europe. The Truckee area would be a
great place to promote new development concepts that will help in sustaining our
environment and the special lifestyle that the area now affords us. We suggest that
the Town work with environmental groups, developers and homeowner
associations to study, explore and promote innovative approaches that would allow
for continued development without negatively impacting our community.
We request that the EIR for Canyon Springs includes an analysis, both during
construction as well as after development is completed, of the impact on air and
water quality and on greenhouse gas emissions over the long term. We suggest that
the EIR includes a definition of requirements for the project (and any other project
in the Town) to include an alternate plan to define and achieve the goal of carbon
neutral development. This could include reduction in density, use of recycled
materials, requirements for energy efficient construction, use of alternate energy
sources throughout the project, replacement of all natural vegetation, requirements
for significant amounts of open space and hundreds of other options that are being
explored and utilized elsewhere.
Home Values
Home prices in Truckee have been hit extremely hard in the last two years. We all
know this and the trend has not abated. The decrease in median selling price in
Truckee dropped another 11% from Q1 2010 to Q1 2011. There are still significant
numbers of bank owned homes, which will continue to negatively affect property
values. At the same time recent developments like Grays Crossing and Elkhorn
Ridge are largely vacant. While we recognize that an economic impact study might
ot be part of the EIR, we ask that the Town provide a detailed analysis of the
mpact of the development on the values of homes in the surrounding areas.
n
i
Neil Blumenfield
0605 Belford Place
ruckee, CA 96161
1
T
Letter endorsed by Martis Peak property owners:
Spencer and Keli Chaney, Curtis Crooks, Diana Dillaway, Tony Fadell, Mike and
Donna Finn, Tinka Gatterdam, Kurt Gantert, Janice M. Hamilton, Kevin Johnson,
Sandy Korth, Danielle Lambert, Elizabeth Moore, David Olsen, Marianne and
Joseph L. Ryan, Gabrielle Toledano, Ted and Mary Thompson, Sandra Thornburg,
ichelle Jones M
May 21, 2011
Town of Truckee Planning Department
10183 Airport Rd.
Truckee CA 96161
Dear Denyelle,
I am writing in response to the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Scoping Process for the
Proposed Canyon Springs Development. As part of the EIR Scoping Process, I would like to
have the following questions and concerns addressed in the EIR for Canyon Springs:
A. Land Use & Planning; Population, Employment, Housing
1. As far as I know, this parcel has not been reviewed for its land use designation and
zoning since the Town incorporated in the early 1990s. This parcel’s land use
designation changed upon its turnover from Nevada County jurisdiction to the Town
of Truckee jurisdiction. It had a significantly lower zoning designation under Nevada
County (approx. 80 units total) and the Town of Truckee up-zoned the property upon
incorporation (.5-1 unit per acre). As a former Planning Commissioner from 2003-
2007, I requested that this parcel be evaluated as part of the Land Use piece of the
General Plan during the General Plan Update process. My request was denied and I
was told that since the parcel had an “active application” the town could not re-
evaluate the parcel at that time. The community has not had an opportunity to re-
evaluate this parcel to be consistent with the current vision and goals of Truckee
since 1996. I request that this application be put on hold until the community has
had the opportunity to re-evaluate this parcel to be consistent with the current vision
and goals of the updated General Plan.
2. As this parcel comprises part of the eastern boundary of the Town of Truckee with
Nevada County I am concerned that the growth inducing impacts caused by this
project will result in additional growth in this area. I believe this project qualifies as
sprawl due to its peripheral location and is at odds with the vision of the Town of
Truckee. Growth for growth’s sake is counter to our goals outlined in the General
Plan 2025. Please address how this large-scale housing development does not
contribute to growth inducing impacts, such as overpopulation and could possibly be
considered a benefit to the community.
3. In addressing the affordable housing requirements per the Town of Truckee Housing
Element, the project applicant mistakenly implies in his marketing materials he
receives additional density beyond the .5-1 unit/acre zoning to meet the required
15% affordable units or lots. I believe the applicant is required to include the
affordable units as part of the total allowable density. Additional density can be
achieved with additional affordable units, but this is not what the applicant is
proposing. Please clarify what the affordable housing requirements are specifically
for this development.
4. With regards to affordable unit requirements, the applicant is proposing 27 units,
however he should be offering 32 affordable lots/units as part of the 15%
requirement of 213 total lots. Please explain how the applicant is addressing the
town’s policies with regards to Affordable Housing.
5. The project applicant proposes to offer multi-unit lots (3-4 units per parcel) in this
single family housing development as a way to address his affordable housing
requirement. The Truckee Housing Element expresses the community’s desire to
keep like with like. This means that in a single family housing development it is not
in keeping with our town’s housing and community character goals to offer a much
different style of housing for the affordable units. Please explain how this project
proposal is not at odds with the goals outlined in the General Plan Update 2025.
6. As the mother of a student at Glenshire Elementary I have seen first-hand the impact
of crowding on our classrooms and the lack of necessary financial and administrative
resources. While the project applicant promotes their payment of required school
fees as a benefit to the community, I would like to see how this project is a net
benefit to the school system and not another drain on inadequate resources.
B. Transportation, Circulation & Parking
1. The previous owners of Canyon Springs had their DEIR traffic study completed
during non-school year period. The traffic levels are significantly lower,
especially in the neighborhoods in close proximity to this parcel during the non-
school year period. I request that the traffic study for this EIR be completed
during the school year and not during a holiday period.
2. While the project applicant proposes to keep the Edinburgh access gated except
during an emergency I would like the EIR to address what the impacts will be on
the roads that connect to Edinburgh during an emergency if all traffic is diverted
this way.
3. Although the project applicant is proposing to keep the only active access to the
project at the Martis Peak Road entrance, I don’t imagine the residents will use
Hirschdale Drive and Interstate 80 as their preferred route to downtown Truckee
as it adds at least 10 extra minutes to the travel time. What will the impacts be
to the intersections along Glenshire Drive if most, if not all of the traffic is
directed down Glenshire Drive into Truckee?
4. What will happen if this project receives entitlements prior to the Railyard
Development completing its required improvements to the Glenshire
Drive/Donner Pass Road intersection? The intersection is already failing or close
to failing without the added growth of either of these developments.
C. Hydrology & Water Quality
1. The proposed development crosses a number of significant waterways. I am
concerned about the degradation not only to the surrounding soils and habitat,
but also to the water quality. Please address how the heavy equipment and
construction methods required to build the bridges and infrastructure will avoid
impacting and forever damaging the surrounding environment.
2. If the project is allowed to move forward with its infrastructure development, ie.
roads, bridges, utilities, etc. prior to the construction of homes, please address
how the run-off will be managed without the permeable surfaces that existed
prior to the application of paving and utilities.
D. Utilities
1. The citizens of Glenshire/Devonshire are currently paying a $10.75 surcharge to
their water bill due to the cost of bringing the water quality up to standard when
higher than safe levels of arsenic were discovered. Will the citizens of
Glenshire/Devonshire and beyond be faced with additional fees to accommodate
the water needs and impacts of the 213 or more additional homesites?
2. An electrical substation is currently located on or in close proximity to the Canyon
Springs parcel. Has an evaluation been performed to determine whether or not
this is damaging to the health of our citizens and the natural environment?
E. Public Services
1. In the event of another catastrophic fire please address how emergency services
can adequately serve this large scale development in addition to the existing
homesites in Glenshire/Devonshire, the Meadows, Cambridge Estates, Juniper
Hills, Juniper Creek, Sierra Bluffs and Elkhorn Ridge.
F. Project Alternatives
1. In addition to the “No Project” Alternative, I would like to request the following
Project Alternatives be reviewed:
i. Transfer appropriate density from this project to a site in the town core
and conserve the property as open space/non-motorized recreation in
perpetuity.
ii. Modify the zoning to .25 units/acre. Allow 25 homes situated in proximity
to the entrance to Martis Peak Road. Cluster the homes and allow for the
remaining acreage to be maintained as undeveloped open space.
iii. Modify the zoning to .5 units/acre but restrict the development from
crossing any waterways or creating any bridges.
iv. No decrease in current zoning designation but require a ¾ buildout of
homes prior to the construction of any additional infrastructure on
subsequent phases.
G. Other
1. Although an economic analysis of possible community impacts is not always
performed as part of the EIR process I am requesting that an economic study be
performed to evaluate the impacts this development could have on our
community. Housing values are at an all time low. We are currently surrounded
by housing developments that sit idle, with few homes built and many
undeveloped parcels. In Glenshire alone there is Elkhorn Ridge, adjacent to
Canyon Springs and Sierra Bluffs at the western edge of Glenshire. Grays
Crossing, Old Greenwood, Donner Crest are some of the recently approved
housing developments that are far from build-out. The Master Plan for the
Railyard development in downtown Truckee has been approved and has yet to
begin construction.
I appreciate the opportunity to have my questions and concerns addressing during this EIR
scoping period for the proposed Canyon Springs development. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Nikki Riley
15903 Windsor Way
Truckee, CA 96161
designsense@infostations.com
Former Town of Truckee Planning Commissioner 2003-2007
LEED AP
Board Member Mountain Area Preservation Foundation
Nevada County First Five Commissioner-Truckee Representative
Truckee Public Art Commissioner
May 22, 2011
Denyelle Nishimori
Truckee Community Development Dept
10183 Truckee Airport Road
Truckee CA 96161
Dear Denyelle,
Re: Scoping Comments/Questions Canyon Springs Environmental Impact Report
Aesthetics/Visual Resources
How can it be guaranteed that this won’t be another undesirable unappealing ghost development?
How will the existing residents be protected from adverse emotional and economic impacts, e.g.
bare land, excessive pavement, lost trees, declined home values due to glut of inventory?
Air Quality
We interested in the air quality impacts during all of the construction phases, especially the initial
infrastructure? How will this be kept to a minimum? How will the excess construction traffic dust
be kept from impacting wildlife habitat?
Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions
With such a large development, we see this negatively inevitably impacting GHG Emissions. Will
the development be reduced in order to address this issue?
Biological Resources/Wetlands
We understand there is a migration deer corridor through these parcels. How will the deer be kept
from being forced out further east so that there is no migration corridor left for them to use?
How will unnecessary tree cutting be guaranteed?
Hydrology
It appears the natural drainage disturbance from Elkhorn Ridge development is adversely
impacting the streams, Glenshire Lake and the Truckee River by causing algae blooms and buildup
of various deposits. What will be done to keep additional drainage from going through Elkhorn?
How will the streams, lake and downhill residences be safe? How will toxic flow onto parcels below
the development be mitigated?
Noise
How will all of the residents within range of the project be protected from ongoing noise pollution
during the initial infrastructure, as well as all phases? How will the duration of the phases be
minimized? Many here suffered significant long-term distress from Elkhorn infrastructure noise.
How will the wildlife be protected from adverse impacts from significant noise/vibrations? Most
deer, coyote, birds and other animals flee when startled by loud noise. Will infrastructure
construction and other phases halt during fawning and post fawning season, so the fawns don’t get
separated from their mothers?
Transportation
Courtenay Lane and Lance Drive, including branching streets, are already significantly suffering
from increased traffic dangers through Elkhorn. Infrastructure traffic was/is dangerous to children
and pets. How will Canyon Springs keep from continuing and increasing this dangerous situation?
How will it be guaranteed that Elkhorn roads won’t be utilized during this project in order to keep
the traffic hazards from increasing? How will the residents on all affected streets in and around
Glenshire be protected from increased traffic due to construction and future increased residency?
Utilities
Heavy trucks during infrastructure of adjacent development previously ruptured water lines in
front of one property on Canterbury Lane. How will it be insured that the residences downhill from
Canyon Springs won’t be impacted by broken water pipes or sewage lines? And how will the
wetlands be protected from these inevitable occurrences?
Construction Phasing
It’s understood the construction will take over 20 or more years to build out. Why would any
project be proposed or accepted that will make such a significant adverse impact over that many
years from noise, traffic, air quality, wildlife and many other hazards?
Alternatives Analysis
We feel this dense and long-term construction project as proposed imposes too many significant
hazards to the existing community and wildlife. Will there be serious consideration and research
done toward the various options to a “no project”? The community should weigh in on this matter.
There is significant community interest in seeing this land purchased and preserved as
open/recreational space. There are enough interested parties to facilitate resources toward this
outcome. Why not allow ample time for that to be worked on before more of our environmental
resources are permanently taken way without considerable efforts for this alternative?
Another alternative would be to have not more than a 20 larger parcel cluster crossing no wetlands.
Thank you for the opportunity in this process.
Residents of Truckee (see below),
Craig & Willow Fierro
10406 Courtenay Lane
Leon & Lee Hutchins
16176 Canterbury Lane
Sean McMahon
10427 Courtenay Lane
Marion Ratkovsky
16154 Canterbury Lane
Stephanie Stewart
10455 Courtenay Lane
Pam Stock
16175 Lance Drive
Linda Stoner
16175 Lance Drive
From:gooddogranch@mindspring.com
To:Denyelle Nishimori
Subject:Canyon Springs Development
Date:Sunday, May 22, 2011 4:01:55 PM
Denyelle Nishimori
Associate Planner
Town of Truckee
RE: EIR for Canyon Springs Development
I am writing you today in opposition to Canyon Springs.
I am against this project for several ressons:
1. It will increase the traffic on Martis Peak Road and Glenshire Drive.
2. It will eliminate needed open space.
3. The last thing Truckee needs right now is more housing.
Thank you very much,
Ted Thompson, Martis Peak Homeowner
May 22, 2011
From:Susan Beauchamp
To:Denyelle Nishimori
Subject:Town of Truckee: News & Updates
Date:Sunday, May 22, 2011 5:34:48 PM
You have received this link of Town of Truckee from:
Susan Beauchamp <suebeauchamp@yahoo.com>
http://townoftruckee.com/index.aspx?page=21&recordid=777
I am extremely concerned that the additional traffic created by the Canyon Springs development will
increase hazards at the intersection of Martis Peak/Whitehorse Roads and Glenshire Drive as well all
roads leading to Edinburgh Drive. How will these hazards be mitigated or reduced?
I am also concerned about the bridge Canyon Springs will provide for development to the east. I would
like a study to be preformed regarding the long term growth impact created by Canyon Springs. Can
the Glenshire/Devonshire and surrounding communities withstand this long-term impact to traffic,
roads, utilities, fire safety evacuation, water quality/availibity, etc.?
Sincerely,
Susan Beauchamp
suebeauchamp123@yahoo.com
Susan Beauchamp
From:Perry Norris
To:Denyelle Nishimori
Cc:Chip Huck
Subject:A comment on Canyon Springs
Date:Monday, May 23, 2011 8:27:11 PM
Truckee Donner Land Trust does not endorse or oppose proposed
developments, so the following comments are intended to be neutral.
The land planned for the Canyon Springs development is of course currently
open space. This property is the Town’s eastern boundary and is contiguous
to natural lands to the east, north and south. These lands, including the
property proposed for development, may provide important habitat for the
beleaguered Verdi deer heard. Significant efforts, including a study currently
underway and the acquisition of Waddle Ranch, have been made to ensure
the survival of the herd. The study, undertaken by the California Department
of Fish and Game, is important, should be included in the DEIR, and assist in
guiding the Town’s decision making regarding this project. The study will help
determine the importance, or unimportance, of the property as migratory
deer habitat.
Finally, if the Land Trust can play a role in this project, benefitting the
community and the property owners, we are eager to help.
Perry Norris
Executive Director
530-582-4711 T.
530-582-5528 F.
www.tdlandtrust.org
From:Corky Carr & Sabine Endriss
To:Denyelle Nishimori
Subject:re: NO TO CANYON SPRINGS
Date:Monday, May 23, 2011 9:12:42 AM
We would wholeheartedly voice our "NO TO CANYON SPRINGS DEVELOPMENT". Truckee does not
need any more sprawling developments with homes that no one will buy, developments that will
negatively alter the local environment, populace and wildlife. We see no "positives" with regard to this
development, just more air pollution, traffic, negative affects on wildlife. NO!!
Sabine Endriss & Keith Carr
10822 Whitehorse Rd.
Truckee, CA 96161
=======
Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
(Email Guard: 7.0.0.26, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.17560)
http://free.pctools.com
=======
May 23, 2011
Denyelle Nishimori
Associate Planner
Truckee Community Development Department
10183 Truckee Airport Road
Truckee CA 96161
Dear Denyelle:
Re: Comments/Questions for Canyon Springs Environmental Impact Report
The following topics reflect comments and questions for the environmental impact study
process for the proposed Canyon Spring development:
Traffic
Given the increase in traffic from the proposed development, both during construction
and upon build-out, how will safety and the flow of traffic be addressed at the Martis
Peak Road, Whitehorse Road and Glenshire Drive intersection?
How will the flow of traffic be maintained with the “slow-moving” construction vehicles
on Glenshire Drive, a two-lane road? How will an increase in heavy construction affect
the structural integrity of the roads in the Glenshire Subdivision including the portion of
Glenshire Drive to I-80? How will the road quality (and any degradation thereof) be
addressed before, during and after construction, and will the developer be required to take
financial responsibility for any damages and any road modifications? In addition, how
will safety be addressed with the increase in heavy equipment driving on our roads?
Assuming a study would take in account the construction traffic on Glenshire Drive,
consideration should reflect the limitation of ALL construction and contractor (including
subs) vehicles to the portion of Glenshire Drive between I-80 and the Martis Peak and
Whitehorse intersection. It should reflect the above-stated impacts and concerns. If this
was a proposed mitigation measure, how would it be enforced? Also, more residential
traffic would most likely take Glenshire Drive west to get back to Town versus the hassle
of dealing with the construction vehicles travelling east towards I-80, and this should be
taken in account.
The proposed development is suggesting that residents utilize Glenshire Drive to I-80.
When I-80 is closed due to accidents or snow storms, how will residents be able to get to
their destination? If Glenshire Drive to Donner Pass Road is an alternate route in one of
these scenarios, will the flow of traffic be studied? It should include any traffic that
would normally stay on I-80 but due to closure, ends up utilizing the Hirschdale exit to
Glenshire Drive. This includes large transport trucks.
While the developers indicate that the use of Glenshire Drive to I-80 will be promoted,
there will be an increase of traffic towards Donner Pass Road. How will homeowners
along Glenshire Drive be able to exit/enter their driveways safely?
Density
From a layperson’s standpoint, it appears that the proposed density (regardless of the
“clustering” concept) is extreme and that in large part this will influence how harsh the
development is on the adjacent community members and wildlife. I would be interested
in an alternative proposal with the density reduced to less than 25%, thereby eliminating
required infrastructure crossing the wetlands and maintaining open land for the continued
wildlife migration. Any studies (e.g., traffic) should take in account full build-out with
the inclusion of a significant number of second units, i.e., 50% not 20%.
Drainage
It’s my understanding that it is common for domestic water and sewage line leakage over
time. How will this be prevented so that leaks or backflow will not end up in the
wetlands and watershed, including nearby waterways such as Juniper Creek, the Truckee
River and Glenshire Lake. How will residents residing downhill from the proposed
development be protected from mold or other damages caused by potential sewage leaks
and other flooding due to this development? How would residents incurring any such
damages recover monetarily? How would any contaminated runoff or erosion be
minimized from entering the various waterways? How would any digging under riparian
habitat be mitigated?
Wildlife Migration
There are frequent deer and other wildlife crossing Glenshire Drive and Hirschdale
from/to The Meadows and Teel properties. With increase of traffic on Glenshire Drive to
I-80, how will the increase potential of wildlife and vehicular collisions be mitigated?
How would the existing and well-known deer migration corridor over the project site and
adjacent areas be protected? How would dogs be prevented from harassing deer and
other wildlife?
Night Skies
Given the proposed density of the development, naturally there will be an increase of
lighting. How much more lighting from both residents and any potentially required
traffic lights will occur? How will this be kept to a minimum to keep our Truckee night
skies protected?
Overflight and Annoyance
Given the proximity of the airport, there may aircraft flying overhead (i.e., emergency
aircraft, aircraft arriving/departing Rwy19-1, IFR flight into Rwy 19 and tow plane
activity). It is my understanding that the airport district encourages the use of Rwy 19-1
during calm winds. What resident disclosures and building mitigation would occur to
deter complaints from new residents of the proposed development?
Phasing and Mitigation Measures
What guarantees will be in place to ensure construction of the infrastructure of the
various phases of the subdivision in a timely manner? The last thing Truckee needs is
another unfinished subdivision. What entity will be responsible for maintenance of the
infrastructure (streets, utilities, drainage, revegetation, etc.) before the improvements are
accepted by the local agencies? Will there be the ability to modify the conditions of
approval if the mitigation measures proposed in the EIR are found to be ineffective?
Jobs
The developers are indicating that there will be job opportunities. This is a short-term
benefit compared to the long-term impacts and degradation to the surrounding
environment, and should be taken into consideration. In addition, observing current local
jobs sites, there are numerous out-of-state license plates on the various construction
vehicles. How would these proposed jobs be maintained locally?
Health and Wellbeing
It is no secret that numerous community members have been and continue to be
distressed and stressed by the proposed development. It is my understanding that the
development is to be phased in over a twenty year period. How will the adverse impacts
and annoyance from the proposed development be minimized on the adjacent-residing
community members during this extended period of time? Will this take in account
future development on the adjacent Teel property? How can the project timeframe be
accelerated to reduce the various adverse impacts and stress on both residents and
wildlife? How can the initial infrastructure construction time period be minimized (to
one year), to help mitigate the long term adverse impacts and stress on both residents and
wildlife?
Thank you for the opportunity to participate in the process.
Sandy Korth
17164 Valley View Road
Truckee CA 96161
Juniper Hill Property Owners (as signed below)
May 23, 2011
To: Denyelle Nishimori, Associate Planner
Truckee Community Development Dept
10183 Truckee Airport Road
Truckee, CA 96161
Re; Scoping for Canyon Springs EIR
Dear Denyelle,
Juniper Hill Property Owners are writing you to express a concern regarding the
proposed Tentative Map for the Canyon Springs Development.
Our main concern for this very large development is the Quantity and Quality of our
future water supply. Where is the water pumped from, is it from the Somerset wells ?
Water Quality: How much water would the project require and what will be the
environmental impacts of installing the infrastructure for supplying water?
What would be done to guarantee the quality of water to stay consistent?
Water Quantity: What guarantee would we have from a reliable report to not dry out
our wells for the next 50 plus years ?
How would we be able to get water if the wells are dried up ?
Since there is no infrastructure in the Juniper Hill area .
Biological Resources
The impact on Deer migration, we all know how more buildings/people/dogs are
impacting the deer population. How will this be mitigated?
Land Use Planning
Open Space, as this land was originally National Forest Land and most of us bought into
Juniper Hill assuming it would stay Forest land, how will we have the same feel and
quality of life as we had known it to be Open Forest land?
Agricultural Resources
This project borders agricultural land and forest land, which previously was national
forest land. Surrounding neighborhoods bought into this knowing that it was National
Forest Land.
Noise:
The noise impact from 20 year long construction to the Somerset/Uxbridge Dr, how will
this be addressed?
Project alternatives
Will the EIR truly address a project alternative such as an extension of land use with
Agriculture and Rural land Uses as is designated in the surrounding area of Nevada
County per their General Plan,a “No Development” alternative and keep as Open space
for the Quality of Life of human and wildlife habitats , as per TofT 2025 Vision.
What will be the comparative impacts of a project of 20 acres parcels = 10
houses, 10 acres parcels = 20 houses ?
Truckee Donner Land Trust purchase as a whole and keep it as Open Space ?
AW (Electronic signature)
Andrea Walhof‐Grisham, lot 16
11322 Somerset Dr
Roger Burns, lot 14
Somerset Dr
Heidi Zimmerman, lot 62
Foxboro Dr
William Kelly, lot 4
Coldwater Dr
From: Ronnie Colby [mailto:ronnie.colby@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 11:48 PM
To: Denyelle Nishimori
Subject: Canyon Springs, EIR Scoping Comments
Hi Denyelle,
Thanks for the opportunity to comment on Canyon Springs (CS).
CS is a questionable development from a number of aspects - increased vehicle traffic, all
varieties of pollution, a housing glut in Truckee, home values that will purportedly
decline for at least another year, road maintenance, utilities installation, fire suppression,
open space, a deer herd, archaeological sites, and (initially) cavalier developers for
starters. This EIR needs to be exhaustive. The prospects of short term jobs (from which
my employer and I would actually likely benefit) is the single biggest reason anyone
locally supports the project, but that's not what it takes to pass muster, last I checked with
the General Plan. CS doesn't really fit with it either.
Sure, CS is technically within town limits, but it's at the far edge. It's sprawl. It extends
east beyond all but a handful of houses. Sure, there will be short term construction work,
but the subsequent, even larger housing glut will additionally diminish existing home
values (I live in Tahoe Donner and recognize this as an outsider).
In fact, the Town should take the CS proposal as an opportunity to co/conduct an updated
economic study of the housing market here (and not just rely on ordinary residents'
"opinions" on CS's and similar developments' effects on home values, or say, dollars
spent per student upon the project's buildout). Why not include, as part of, or in addition
to the EIR, the project applicants' financial claims? New construction is not inexpensive.
I understand (perhaps incorrectly) that there is an ongoing study of the resident deer herd.
I would encourage the EIR to be deemed incomplete without the results of that study.
Glenshire is full of families, and the construction-related air and groundwater pollution
will be significant. Emissions must be addressed in the EIR - Glenshire is far from town.
Vehicle traffic is already ridiculous. What will these vehicle emissions mean for the
Truckee river? How about a traffic study done a several times throughout the year instead
of all at once? An average seems a better number to base things on.
Will there be trails accessible when folks start moving in? Year round?
How many bridges will need to be built? How what kinds of impacts will bridges have on
water quality?
Please hold such a questionable project to the highest standard. Consider the will of
Truckee residents and neighbors. Ask the project applicants to at least begin designing
appropriate, stout homes - places with passive solar, for example as it's an alpen
environment here. Employ the sun! Consider the environmental impacts of
inappropriately designed homes that fail to utilize the sun to minimize heating costs and
improve a home's livability throughout the year.
Perhaps most importantly, however - expand the scope of the EIR to include a detailed
new study of the housing market in Truckee to prove that this will not be a project that
devalues neighboring home markets.
A sincere thanks for your time and consideration,
Ronnie Colby
Truckee, CA
May 23, 2011
From: Nancy Richards, POB 10362 Truckee, CA 96162 nancycrichards@yahoo.com
To: Denyelle Nishimori, Town of Truckee Community Development
RE: Notice of Preparation of the Draft Environmental Impact Report, Canyon Springs
Subdivision (Application No. 10-106/TM)
Dear Denyelle,
As a resident of Truckee, I would like to submit the following comments for the official
record.
The Canyon Springs EIR should evaluate the energy related impacts of the projects
and how the project will be designed to facilitate meeting the State’s zero-net-energy
goals for all new residential construction by year 2020 and how the project will
contribute to the reduction of vehicle miles traveled in the region and within the Town of
Truckee.
Please include in the analysis how the project meets the requirements of the California
Solar Rights Act comprising the following California sections of law: California Civil
Code Sections 714 and 714.1, California Civil Code Section 801, California Civil Code
Section 801.5, California Government Code Section 65850.5, California Health and
Safety Code Section 17959.1, California Government Code Section 66475.3 and,
California Government Code Section 66473.1.
Please give particular attention to providing a detailed analysis of how the design of the
subdivision provides to the extent feasible for future passive and natural heating and
cooling opportunities in the subdivision as required by California Government Code
Section 66473.1:
CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66473.1
(a) The design of a subdivision for which a tentative map is required pursuant to
Section 66426 shall provide, to the extent feasible, for future passive or natural
heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision.
(b) (1) Examples of passive or natural heating opportunities in subdivision design,
include design of lot size and configuration to permit orientation of a structure in an
east-west alignment for southern exposure.
(2) Examples of passive or natural cooling opportunities in subdivision design include
design of lot size and configuration to permit orientation of a structure to take
advantage of shade or prevailing breezes.
(c) In providing for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the
design of a subdivision, consideration shall be given to local climate, to contour, to
configuration of the parcel to be divided, and to other design and improvement
requirements, and that provision shall not result in reducing allowable densities or the
percentage of a lot that may be occupied by a building or structure under applicable
planning and zoning in effect at the time the tentative map is filed.
(d) The requirements of this section do not apply to condominium projects which
consist of the subdivision of airspace in an existing building when no new structures
are added.
(e) For the purposes of this section, "feasible" means capable of being accomplished
successful manner within a reasonable period of time, taking into account economic,
environmental, social and technological factors.
Also provide a detailed evaluation of how the subdivision will meet the Truckee General
Plan’s policies regarding energy efficiency, energy conservation and solar subdivision
design including the analysis of the solar potential of individual lots.
Also, The EIR should thoroughly evaluate greenhouse gas emissions on and off site
and provide an analysis of how the project will contribute to the reduction of greenhouse
gas emissions in the Truckee jurisdiction. Please refer to the CEQA Guidelines
Amendments adopted Dec 30, 2009, effective March 18, 2010.
http://ceres.ca.gov/ceqa/guidelines/
The EIR should also provide an analysis of carbon sequestration impacts onsite
associated with tree and vegetation removal and long term management of retained
trees and vegetation.
Craig & Jody Poe
16241 Edinburgh Dr
Truckee, CA 96161
Phone 530.550.0891
cjpoe@mac.com
May 23, 2011
Denyelle Nishimori, Associate Planner, Truckee Community
Development Department:
We are homeowners directly adjacent to the proposed
Canyon Springs development. We are aware that the
process for preparing the Environmental Impact Report is
underway.
We would like to have our many concerns about the
project considered in the report.
Will the project have a direct and negative impact on the
exisiting wildlife in the area – including habitat and
migration paths?
How will the project impact the existing watershed
including seasonal runoff?
How much additional traffic and noise will be generated
as a result of the project?
Are additional housing units necessary given the volume
of inventory that currently exists? What will the impacts to
schools be? What will the immediate and long-term
impacts to roads (Edinburgh Dr, Regency Cir, Courtney
Lane, Somerset Dr and Glenshire Dr) and infrastructure
be?
Regards,
Craig and Jody Poe
From:Janet Silver
To:Denyelle Nishimori
Subject:Canyon Springs EIR Scoping Concerns
Date:Monday, May 23, 2011 5:01:59 PM
Dear Denyelle:
This is my third letter to be written to the Town concerning development, which in this
latest chapter, is known as "Canyon Springs."
My family lives at the intersection of Whitehorse, Martis Peak and Glenshire Drive. This is
an extremely dangerous intersection that has been also noted in several several letters to
the Town to be addressed/studied in the proposed EIR. It is ludicrous to think that there
would only be 1 access point to this development via Martis Peak Road. Glenshire was
never designed to handle this kind of traffic.
However, since traffic will be addressed in the EIR, one point I would like to be addressed
is the lack of adherence to the posted speed limits within Glenshire. I would like the EIR
to measure the average speed cars are traveling on Glenshire Drive and side roads, in
addition to the amount of traffic. Since I live front, point & center to the intersection in
question, I would estimate the rate of speed to be 40 mph instead of the posted 25.
Cars have a tendency to speed up as they travel east on Glenshire Drive towards the
freeway. I will pull out of my driveway after carefully looking both ways a couple of
times, only to pull out and discover a vehicle right on my tail, including vehicles traveling
west. Even the school buses. Everyone. Adding more speeding traffic? A horrible
thought.
I would also like the EIR to address, if possible, the current occupancy rate in Glenshire,
Cambridge Estates, the Meadows, Elkhorn Ridge, Sierra Bluffs and Glenshire (including
the remaining build-able lots), i.e. - what is the remaining build-able lots and how many
homes are unoccupied in our area. Let's consider in-fill, not more sprawl.
Thank you.
Janet Silver
17086 Glenshire Drive
Truckee, CA 96161
(530) 582-7059