HomeMy Public PortalAbout43 Truckee Trails and Bikeways Master Plan TOWN OF TRUCKEE
California
RESOLUTION 2012-43
A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TRUCKEE
AMENDING THE TRUCKEE TRAILS AND BIKEWAYS MASTER PLAN
WHEREAS, Town of Truckee Town Council adopted a Truckee Trails and Bikeways
Master Plan on April 4, 2002, by Resolution No. 2002-17; and
WHEREAS, Town of Truckee Town Council approved prior amendments to the Truckee
Trails and Bikeways Master Plan on May 17, 2007, by Resolution No. 2007-20; and
WHEREAS, Town of Truckee has proposed to amend the Truckee Trails and Bikeways
Master Plan for the purpose of reformatting the document and updating the text and maps to
better reflect the current trail network; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission is responsible for the review and consideration of
proposed amendments to the Master Plan including forwarding a recommendation on the
approval, approval with modifications, or denial of the amendments; and
WHEREAS, the Commission held a public hearing on November 20, 2012 to accept
public input and to consider the proposed amendments; and
WHEREAS, the Commission on November 20, 2012 adopted Resolution No. 2012-10,
thereby recommending approval of the proposed amendments; and
WHEREAS, a public notice was published in the Sierra Sun on November 9, 2012,
informing the public of the proposed date, time and location of the Town Council hearing for the
consideration of the project amendment; and
WHEREAS, the Council held a public hearing on November 27, 2012 to accept public
input and to consider the proposed amendments, and the Council considered all public
comments and input; and
WHEREAS, the Council finds the proposed amendments are exempt from further review
under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA
Guidelines; and
WHEREAS, the Council finds the proposed amendments are consistent with the Master
Plan and do not create any internal conflicts with other parts of the Master Plan.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the Town Council of the Town of Truckee
hereby amends the Truckee Trails and Bikeways Master Plan as detailed in attached Exhibit A
and as summarized below:
a) General Document: Updated page layout software and colorized text. Insertion of color
photographs of existing trails and trail facilities. Front cover updated with color
photograph of Truckee River Legacy Trail:
b) Chapters 1-3: Minor edits within each chapter to update the Master Plan background,
introduction and trail mileage counts;
c) Appendix B, Exhibit 1: Recognizes that access is prohibited on private properties north
of Town boundary (Carpenter Valley area); and
d) Appendix D, Exhibit 1 (Local Map): Updated to reflect trail segments which have been
constructed since the last Master Plan amendment. Includes trail connections within
roundabouts.
The foregoing Resolution was introduced by Council Member Wallace Dee,
seconded by Vice Mayor Green at a Regular Meeting of the Truckee Town Council, held
on the 27th day of November, 2012 and adopted by the following vote:
AYES: Council Member Wallace Dee, Vice Mayor Green, Council Member
Brown, and Mayor deRyk Jones.
NOES: None.
ABSENT: Council Member Anderson.
Joan deR Jones, Mayor
ATTEST:
,
Judy P ice, M �,' own Clerk
Attachments:
1. Exhibit A— Truckee Trails and Bikeways Master Plan dated November 2012
TOWN OF TRUCKEE TOWN COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2012-43
IExhibit A
Truckee Trails and Bikeways Master Plan dated November 2012
I
i1) �1�1"�� r_ — Town of Truckee._„..,
"....,..,,-,-, ,,,,,,,,,"
. ._ . .. a•-
.-1, - ,ate {A'.. �.r
4�
i` TRAILS
*:4,.. ;I - . _ ., AND
„..
F fir - BIKEWAYS
A* MASTER...
.+,:..a ice.
111,A -,'I � .. PLAN,144,69.,
.,.. ,... i •, , :_,A.. .
. ... , .
....,..
....';ems ..m,„.,:.: ...,....... .:„..,. .
..., . , •
November 2012
Contents
1 Introduction&Summary 7
Benefits of Trails&Bikeways 7
Plan Purpose 7
Plan Boundaries 8
Plan Scope& Detail 9
Timing& Process of Implementation 9
Plan Organization &Content 10
The Planning Participants 10
The Planning Process 10
Community Input 11
Annual Review 12
2 Existing Local & Regional Setting 13
Local Conditions 13
Regional Conditions 13
Local - Regional Connectivity 14
3 Relationship with the General Plan, Downtown Specific Plan &
Other Community Plans 15
General Plan 15
Downtown Specific Plan 15
Truckee Donner Recreation and Park District Master Plan 16
Nevada County Bicycle&Rural Recreational Trails Master Plans
16
Placer County Regional Bikeway Plan, Legacy Program& MVCP
Update 17
Plan Conflicts 17
4 Goals& Policies 18
Goals&Policies—What are they? 18
Organization& Format 18
Planning Goals&Policies 19
Development Goals& Policies 22
Management Goals&Policies 24
5 On-Street Bikeways 26
Purpose& Intent 26
Types of Bikeways 26
Class I Bike Path Design Criteria 27
I
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan 1
6 Recreational Trails 29
Purpose& Intent 29
Types of Recreational Trails 29
Corridor vs.Alignment Planning 30
7 Support Facilities& Programs 31
Introduction 31
Trailheads 31
Trailheads with Parking Areas 31
Restrooms 32
Bicycle Parking &Changing Facilities 33
Multi-Modal Connections 33
Safety& Education 34
Regional Cooperation &Opportunities 35
8 Design Guidelines 36
Introduction 36
Use&Application 36
Class I Bike Paths&On-Street Bikeway Guidelines 36
Earthen Trail Guidelines 43
Disabled Access Guidelines 51
Illustrated Design Guidelines52
9 Design & Development 65
Recreational Trail Proposal & Evaluation Process 65
Preferred Recreational Trail Segments 66
On-Street Bikeway Proposal &Evaluation Process 66
Preferred On-Street Bikeway Segments 67
10 Private Lands 69
Overview 69
New Development- Reservations&Dedications 69
Existing Development 70
Condemnation Policy Statement 70
11 Maintenance, Monitoring &Security72
Introduction 72
Property Management 72
Corridor Maintenance 75
Paved Surface Maintenance 75
Maintenance/Operations Implications 77
2 Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
12 Funding &Financing 78
Opportunities 78
Non-Profit/Foundation Opportunities 79
Public-Private Partnerships 80
Financing Techniques80
13 Environmental Document 81
Program EIR—What is it? 81
Relationship to Future Projects/Environmental Review 81
EIR Scope 82
Summary of Conclusions 82
Appendices 84
I
I
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan 3
Acknowledgements
Truckee Trails & Bikeways Master Plan
Amended November 13, 2012—Council Resolution No. 2012-__
Amended May 17, 2007—Council Resolution No. 2007-20
Adopted April 4, 2002—Council Resolution No. 2002-17
Prepared by the Town of Truckee Community Development
Department—Planning Division:
Truckee Town Administrative Offices
10183 Truckee Airport Road
Truckee, California 96161
(530) 582-7820
Facilitation and technical assistance provided by the National Park Service
Rivers, Trails& Conservation Assistance Program:
U.S. Department of the Interior
National Park Service
Pacific West Region
Pacific Great Basin Support Office
1111 Jackson Street, Suite 700
Oakland, CA 94607
(510)817-1449
Technical assistance provided by:
Alta Consulting—Michael Jones
Western Botanical Services—Julie Etra
Wildlife Resource Consultants—Sue Fox
Susan Lindstrom, PhD—Consulting Archaeologist
Leigh, Scott&Cleary Consulting—Gordon Shaw
Ward-Young Architects—Vangela Wilson
I
4 Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
Master Plan Development Team
Development of the Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan involved a diverse team
of many community volunteers. Their hard work and dedication is acknowledged
by the Town of Truckee and appreciated by the community.
Town of Truckee Staff
Tony Lashbrook, Community Development Director
Duane Hall, Town Planner
Gavin Ball, Associate Planner/Project Manager
Stacy Wydra, Assistant Planner
Heidi Scoble, Assistant Planner
Chris Scott, Planning Technician
Kelly Holm/Suellen McGeorge, Administrative Secretary
National Park Service Staff
Barbara Rice, Program Coordinator
Suzanne Bourguignon, Student Intern
Rivers, Trails & Conservation Assistance Program
Advisory Committee
Bill Palmer/Nancy Richards Karen Sessler
Doug Mullins/Dan O'Gorman Conlan Jones
Karl Knapp Daniel Collin
Sherry Mays/Eric Larusson Paco Lindsay
Judy Mayorga Christine Rourke
Andrew Hall/Jacqueline Ginley Lore McLaren
Geoff Stephens Steve Yale
Milan Wight Chuck Bentson
Jerusha Crockett-Hall Barbara Green
Advisory Committee—Alternates
Nancy Markson Claudia Carroll-Hanson
Lisa Cutter Steve Marshman
K. Valerie Green Dan Wendin
Jim Westphal
Advocacy Group
Steve Harris Michele Franke
Jim Zellars Ray Bonnett
Barbara Sutherland Vickie Lamoureux
Peggy Ricketts John M. Ahern
Rod Miller Jae Gustafson
Susan Antipa Mountain Jack Ingram
David Fenimore Dan LaPlant
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan 5
Steering Committee
Kathleen Eagan Dan Wendin—Truckee Donner Land Trust
Lisa Cutter Doug Mullins—Truckee Donner Recreation &
Paco Lindsey Park District
Barbara Green Fran Herbst—United States Forest Service
2012 Interim Update
Town Council
Joan deRyk Jones
Barbara Green
Mark Brown
Caroyln Wallace Dee
Richard Anderson
Planning Commission
Tom Murphy
Stephen Ramos
Heather Beckman
Patrick Flora
Patrick Callagahan
Town of Truckee Staff
John McLaughlin, Community Development Director
Jenna Endres, Associate Planner
Becky Bucar,Associate Engineer
Laura Dabe, Administrative Secretary
I
6 Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
1 Introduction & Summary
Benefits of Trails & Bikeways
Trails and multi-use paths are the foundation of a comprehensive bicycling and
walking system. Trails offer numerous aesthetic and recreational opportunities, as ,•', - '
well as commuter options for walking,hiking,bicycling,skating or otherwise traveling ' .
to and from community destinations. Residents desiring to bicycle or walk to work, 1'"
go for a family bicycle ride or walk to the park or library, enjoy a longer outing to
and around Donner Lake or along the Truckee River, or simply take pleasure in
walking will benefit from new trails. Residents that use trails gain the added health _ --- ."-r_
benefit of exercise through cycling and walking.
As trail systems are implemented, they also offer an alternative mode of .s
transportation to the automobile.With increased walking and bicycling as a means - - r
of transportation, measurable air quality benefits result.
s 4,,
.4. `.
Trails can have unexpected value by serving as a buffer for open spaces,wetlands ,,
and wildlife habitat,and even preserving clean water and aquifers.Along with these _ ; {y„ � "
environmental benefits,trails offer educational opportunities through interpretation � �" �'A.�
Truc ee River Legacy Trai
of the environment that they pass through.
The creation of more trails for walking and bicycling in Truckee can raise property
values, provide common space for social interactions and supplement existing
recreational opportunities. Trails have proven to be safe places that encourage
healthy lifestyles and improve the livability of a community. They attract the young
and the old, the healthy and the disabled. They are a marker of a welcoming and
visionary community.
Plan Purpose
The Town of Truckee first committed to the development of a comprehensive
Truckee Trails & Bikeways Master Plan in February 1996 with adoption of the first
Town of Truckee General Plan. Many Land Use, Conservation &Open Space and
Circulation policies contained within the General Plan encourage the development
and implementation of a non-motorized system promoting the use of alternative
transportation and creating recreational opportunities for the Truckee community
and beyond. Specifically, General Plan Conservation & Open Space Policy 8.1
provided direction to "establish a town-wide multi-use public trail system" with
"linkages outside of Town limits" through the development and adoption of a local
Master Plan. The purpose of the Truckee Trails & Bikeways Master Plan was to
implement this and the many other directly related policies contained within the
General Plan.
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan 7
Consistent with this General Plan policy direction,the following"Purpose Statement"
was developed to describe the intent of the Master Plan:
Purpose Statement Purpose Statement
A community- A community-based planning effort promoting the
based planning development of a local multi-use trail and bikeway
effort promoting system designed to increase recreational, educational
the development and alternative transportation opportunities for
of a local multi-use the benefit of local residents and visitors to the
trail and bikeway Truckee area. The system will link the Town's historic
system designed to downtown, residential and commercial areas, and
increase recreational, recreational, educational, natural and historical
educational resources and plan for connections to regional public
and alternative lands and trail and bikeway systems.
transportation
opportunities for
the benefit of local The Master Plan was designed in large part for non-motorized use consistent with the
residents and visitors policy directive of the General Plan.The planned system accommodates motorized
to the Truckee area. recreational use in limited situations when alternative routes are unavailable, it is
The system will link necessary to access public motorized recreation and when consistent with the
the Town's historic goals of the Plan (see Chapter 4—Goals & Policies, Planning Goal 1).
downtown, residential
and commercial areas, Although development of the Plan was primarily been driven by the Town of
and recreational, Truckee, it is a community plan to be used by all public and private entities
educational. natural and proposing development of a recreational trail or on-street bikeway project within
historical resources and the boundaries of the Plan. It is intended to be used as a guide for future local,
plan for connections to state and federal roadway improvement projects and all future recreational trail
regional public lands projects. When reasonable and warranted, all local, state and federally sponsored
and trail and bikeway projects with an opportunity to implement the objectives of the Plan are strongly
systems. encouraged to expand or modify the scope of these individual projects to be
consistent with the Plan.
Plan Boundaries
The jurisdictional boundaries of the Town of Truckee,established with incorporation
of the Town in March 1993, create the limits of the focused planning effort for this
Plan. The Truckee Trails & Bikeways Master Plan is not a regional plan. Although
the scope of the Plan is solely contained within the incorporated Town limits, the
Plan recognizes that the Town of Truckee is an integral part of the larger Truckee/
North Lake Tahoe region and considers the planned system within the regional
context. The following ''Planning Area Description" was developed consistent
with the necessary local scope of the Master Plan and recognition of the needed
8 Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
coordination with regional trail and bikeway systems:
Planning Area Description
The planning area includes and focuses on all Planning Area
lands within the Town of Truckee, considering
and planning for linkages to public lands and Description
trail and bikeway systems within the Truckee
and North Tahoe region. The planning area
includes and focuses
on all lands within
the Town of Truckee.
Plan Scope & Detail considering and
planning for linkages
The planning scope of the Plan is comprehensive, but not specific. The Plan has to public lands and trail
been designed and developed to be a long-range planning document for both and bikeway systems
recreational trails and on-street bikeways and the many environmental, political within the Truckee and
and social issues associated with implementation of the Plan. The goal of the North Tahoe region.
Plan development process was to create a framework for the creation of a town-
wide system, involving a holistic or"big picture" analysis of the opportunities and
constraints affecting its creation and implementation. The Plan is designed to
promote connections between the many distinct areas and resources within the
Town of Truckee,not specific connections within these individual areas or resources.
The Plan does not attempt to provide answers or solutions for all specific issues
associated with implementation of the planned system. The large scope of the
Plan boundaries warranted the "broad stroke" planning philosophy utilized for
development of the Plan and the deferment of specific project-level analysis to
subsequent public processes. The most representative example of this planning
philosophy is the "corridor" planning methodology used for the recreational trail
planning process further described in Chapter 6 — Recreational Trails. Although
the Plan does not contain a specific analysis of every issue associated with its
implementation, it does identify these yet-to-be resolved issues and creates a public
process intended to ensure the open discussion and resolution of any remaining
issues and unanswered questions specific to each individual proposal.
Timing & Process of Implementation
Completion of the nearly 133 miles of recreational trails and on-street bikeways
envisioned within the Plan will not occur overnight, and that a timeline for its
completion cannot be made. The Plan is used as a tool to guide the incremental
development of specific recreational trail segments and on-street bikeways as
resources and opportunities arise. Opportunities to incrementally implement the
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan 9
Plan created with new development proposals, the availability of grant funding,
dedicated budgeted monies and public-private partnerships will all contribute to
the ultimate completion of the planned system.The Town of Truckee is committed
to implementation of the Plan,both through the allocation of its own resources and
encouragement and cooperation with other private and public entities.
Since the initial adoption of the Master Plan in 2002, approximately 14 miles of
The Town has Class I trails and 34 miles of Class II trails have been built within the Town limits.
built 14 miles of Some of these trails were constructed with local and grant funds,while others were
Class I trails and constructed as part of development projects.
34 miles of Class
Ill trails since the
initial adoption of Plan Organization & Content
the Master Plan in
2002. The Master Plan consists of two volumes, this Master Plan document known as
Volume I and the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared in support of the
Plan identified as Volume II. Many cross-references are contained within each
document, most notably between Chapter 8—Design Guidelines of this Volume
I Master Plan document and the Volume II Environmental Impact Report further
described in Chapter 13—Environmental Document, of the Plan.
The Planning Participants
Town staff initated the Master Plan planning process in 1997 with the creation of an
informal Steering Committee, which provided initial direction to the Town Council,
A subsequent advertising campaign solicited community volunteers to help with
development of the Plan,generating a pool of over 40 individuals.The high level of
volunteer interest led to the formation of two distinct groups,the Advisory Committee
and the Advocacy Group, appointed by Town Council in September 1998.
The Master Plan was a product of a more than two-year planning process involving
both volunteer groups and representing the many diverse trail and bikeway
interests within the Truckee community, including local hiking, biking, equestrian
and alternative transportation interests; five residential subdivisions; and local
public agencies, private districts and interest groups. The planning process also
involved technical assistance provided by the National Park Service—Rivers,Trails
and Conservation Assistance Program,
The Planning Process
Following initial brainstorming sessions, the 1997 Steering Committee dissolved
into the more formal Advisory Committee and Advocacy Group.Meetings,mapping
sessions and "ground-testing" tours were attended by the group members,
representing more than a thousand hours of volunteer time committed to the
10 Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
planning effort.
Community Input
Prior to drafting the Master Plan, four informal community workshops were held at
the Glenshire Clubhouse,Tahoe Donner Clubhouse,Truckee Sanitary District and
Truckee Town Hall.The workshops were designed to solicit initial and"uncensored"
feedback from the community on the Master Plan documents developed by staff and
the two volunteer groups. Over 50 community members attended the workshops,
providing valuable input and helping to formulate the ultimate Master Plan.
Additional advertisement of both the ongoing planning process and release of the
draft documents was included in continuous Sierra Sun articles and within the
quarterly Town newsletter. The planning
process involved
A public scoping meeting was held in 2001 to help define the scope of the the participation of
Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The intent of the workshop was to provide over 50 community
the community an opportunity to comment on the content of the environmental members and
document and to identify specific community environmental issues warranting over 1,000 hours
focused study and analysis. of volunteer time
The draft Master Plan and EIR were released for public review on November 21, by the Advisory Committee and
2001 via the quarterly Town Newsletter and mail to over 10,000 in-town property Advocacy Group.
owners. A similar notification mailing was concurrently distributed to over 8,000
out-of-town property owners. This public notification effort was intended to inform
community members and property owners of the availability of the Master Plan
and Program EIR, encourage community comment and input, and promote an
understanding of the goals and objectives of the Plan.
Formal Planning Commission Review
The Town Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 13, 2002, to
formally consider the Master Plan and EIR and develop a recommendation to the
Town Council. The Planning Commission acted unanimously to adopt Resolution
2002-06, recommending the Town Council adopt the Master Plan and certify the
Final EIR. This recommendation included 24 specific changes to the Master Plan
and 19 changes to the Final EIR, initiated by both the Planning Commission and
staff recommendations in response to the many written comments and verbal
testimony provided to the Planning Commission.
Formal and Final Town Council Action
On April 4, 2002, the Truckee Town Council considered the Planning Commission
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan 11
recommendation. Many additional written public comments and verbal testimonies
were provided to the Town Council,a majority of which voiced support for adoption
of the Master Plan and certification of the Final EIR. Opposition and concerns to
adoption of the Master Plan were also expressed verbally and in writing, resulting
in three specific additional changes to the Master Plan involving condemnation,
public communication and an annual review of the Master Plan. The final Master
Plan included all of the changes made by the Town Council,reflected in their action
to adopt Resolution 2002-17 adopting the Truckee Trails & Bikeways Master Plan
and certifying the Final EIR.
Annual Review
In recognition of the Master Plan being a dynamic document, and in response
to public comment provided during the formal public hearing process, the Town
Council committed to annually reviewing the successes and failures of the Master
Plan and any specific projects implementing the Master Plan over the previous
year. The annual review is held within a noticed public hearing before the Town
Council or other hearing body as designated.
12 Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
2 Existing Local & Regional Setting
Local Conditions
The current Truckee recreational trail system is characterized by a series of
informal trails developed over many years of use and lacking cohesiveness and
planned connections. Few formal trails exist, limited to the 60-mile trail system
owned and maintained by the Tahoe Donner Association (the majority of which
is located outside the Town limits), a portion of the United States Forest Service-
maintained Commemorative Emigrant Trail, the Truckee River Legacy Trail, and
the Old Greenway/Gray's Crossing trail sytem, The ongoing development of the
approximately 50-mile Donner Lake Rim Trail (also a large portion of which is
located outside the town boundaries)will contribute to the cohesiveness of the Plan
and provide critical regional connections. Many miles of informal trails exist in the ,
community, to be formalized and integrated into the planned town-wide system. FR
The current on-street bikeway system was non-existent prior to the summer of 1998,
when the Town implemented the first in-town Class II bike lane on Donner Pass
Road from the east Gateway area to Coldstream. Class II bike lanes have since
been continued on Donner Pass Road to the west end of Donner Lake and the
east end of Gateway,as well as along the length of the Northwoods Boulevard loop
within the Tahoe Donner subdivision. The Truckee River Legacy Trail, the Gray's Gray's Crossing
Crossing and Old Greenwood trail system, and facilities around roundabouts have
all resulted in an expanded Class I bikeway system.
Facilities in support of bicycling (including lockers, changing facilities, bike racks
and restrooms)are limited. Lockers and changing facilities are limited to the largest
employers and businesses within the area, including the Town of Truckee, Tahoe
Forest Hospital and Truckee Tahoe Lumber Company. The availability of bicycle
racks continually increases as a requirement of new commercial and multiple family
residential development occurring within the Town; however, bike racks in support
of existing development are essentially non-existent.
Regional Conditions
The greater Truckee/North Lake Tahoe region encompasses a large geographic
area, a multitude of government jurisdictions and many diverse environmental
settings and conditions.The region includes the Placer County lands located south
of the Town limits and extending into the northerly portion of the Lake Tahoe basin.
The County of Nevada's jurisdictional boundaries encompass the majority of the
Truckee town limits,including Donner Summit to the west;Carpenter Valley,Hobart
Mills and Prosser Reservoir to the north;and Boca Reservoir and the Martis Valley
(a portion of which is also in Placer County)to the west. Many state and federally
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan 13
owned lands are interspersed throughout both Placer and Nevada County, most
notably those owned and maintained by the United States Forest Service.
The Truckee/North Lake Tahoe region is similarly characterized by a network of
informal trails, such as the Pacific Crest Trail, Commemorative Emigrant Trail,
Sawtooth Trail and Tahoe Rim Trail.A smaller network of formal trails such as the
Northstar Ski Area and that existing within the many public lands located within
the region contribute to the regional trail system, although also lack the necessary
continuity to provide for effective use. Additional regional recreational trails (see
Local Map —connection with Segment 17) planned by the United States Forest
Service will contribute to the regional trail system.
Regional on-street bikeway opportunities are many. State Highway 89 North/
South, State Highway 267 and Old Highway 40 (Donner Pass Road) are all
commonly utilized by bicyclists for recreation and alternative transportation routes,
and many local routes in the Town have been signed as Class Ill bike routes since
the adoption of this plan.The north-south and east-west connections provided via
these four highway segments are crucial to the success of an on-street bikeway
network linking Truckee with the surrounding region.
Regional bicycle connections to other forms of transportation such as public transit
are currently available through the Tahoe Area Rapid Transit, Truckee Trolley and
Northstar Shuttle services.These multi-modal connections have provided a higher
degree of accessibility and mobility to regional residents and visitors, offering
bicyclists and pedestrians safe transfer to regional destinations.
Local - Regional Connectivity
The Town of Truckee hopes that this planning effort has provided the basis for
a larger, region-based planning effort. A coordinated effort between the regional
public agencies and the community at large is necessary to establish a network
of linked recreational trails and on-street bikeways for the benefit of the greater
Truckee/North Lake Tahoe region.A regional planning effort also provides for more
efficient use of lands and public resources by coordinating supporting facilities(see
Chapter 7, Support Facilities&Programs).A summary of the independent regional
trail and bikeway planning efforts is included within Chapter 3, Relationship with
the General Plan, Downtown Specific Plan&Other Community Plans, of the Plan.
Coordination and communication with the United States Forest Service, State
of California Department of Transportation, Placer County, Nevada County and
each of their respective transportation planning agencies is crucial in support of a
successful,regionally ntegrated network.Participation in active and future regional
planning efforts will also be necessary in support of a regionally integrated network
of recreational trails and on-street bikeways.
14 Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
3 Relationship with the General
Plan, Downtown Specific Plan & Other
Community Plans
General Plan
The development of a non-motorized transportation and recreation network for the General Plan Vision
Town of Truckee was a clear directive of the General Plan. Land Use, Circulation Statement
and Conservation&Open Space policies contained within the General Plan provide
direction to "provide a safe, comprehensive and integrated system of facilities for recognize the Truckee
pedestrians and cyclists and other non-motorized modes of transportation"(General River as one of the
Plan Circulation Goal 10) and "link open space areas in Truckee through a well- Town's primary assets.
connected network of open space corridors and trails"(General Plan Conservation Development will be
& Open Space Element Goal 9). The General Plan's Vision Statement states that pedestrian oriented and
"development will be pedestrian oriented and provide access to recreation and public provide public access
space"and that"circulation will be improved through an enhanced roads and trails to recreation and open
network and by encouraging alternative means of transportation." space. Circulation will
be improved through an
As an implementing tool for, and an extension of,the Town General Plan,the Trails enhanced road system
& Bikeways Master Plan must be consistent with the many goals and policies of and by encouraging
the General Plan. Over 50 policies of the General Plan either directly or indirectly alternative means of
relate to the Master Plan,including General Plan policies in the following categories: transportation.
Figure 3.1 General Plan Vision
• Land Use Statement
• Downtown Study Area
• Donner Lake Community Area
• Noise
• Circulation
• Conservation & Open Space
• Planned Communities (known as PC-1, PC-2 & PC-3)
Each General Plan policy has been evaluated for consistency with the Master
Plan and the proposed general trail system contained within Plate 5, Open Space,
Natural/Scenic Resources and Trails, of the General Plan. Many references to
General Plan policies are included within the Plan, and to a much greater extent,
within each of the environmental sections of the Environmental Impact Report
(EIR). Chapter 4.1, Land Use, Plans and Policies, of the EIR contains an analysis
and summary of the Master Plan's necessary consistency with the General Plan.
Downtown Specific Plan
The Town of Truckee Downtown Specific Plan (DSP)was adopted by the Truckee
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan 15
Town Council in November 1997, implementing the pedestrian and bicycle
circulation goals of the Town General Plan for the Downtown area. With one
exception, the Master Plan does not modify the trails and bikeways provided for
within the DSP; rather it incorporates these planned improvements into the town-
wide system by providing linkages and connections to trails and bikeways located
outside the DSP boundaries. In response to the planning for the Tahoe Donner
third connector road, the Master Plan proposes a change from the Class II bike
lane contained within the DSP (Bridge Street connection) to a Class I bike path.
The Master Plan has also been developed to provide consistency with the many
applicable policies within the DSP.
Truckee Donner Recreation and Park District Master Plan
The Truckee Donner Recreation and Park District (TDRPD) adopted a Ten-Year
Master Plan for the community in 1991 formulated to"facilitate the establishment of
a balanced park,recreation and open space system." The unmet recreational needs
of the community were identified by the District through a survey of the residents
and users of the District facilities and programs, concluding the development of
"bike trails" as the highest community priority. Because the scope of the TDRPD
Master Plan included more than just trail and bikeway facility planning, a detailed
analysis of"bike paths"and "multiple use trails"were not included within the Plan.
The TDRPD Plan appropriately deferred implementation of on-street bikeways to
the Nevada County Transportation Commission and provided only general direction
to create a recreational trail system to accommodate "casual, passive and low
speed uses by many types of users." The Truckee Trails& Bikeways Master Plan
is intended to supplement and implement the TDRPD Master Plan by providing
the more-detailed analysis necessary for the development of a town-wide trail and
bikeway system.
Nevada County Bicycle& Rural Recreational Trails Master Plans
An update of the Nevada County Bicycle Master Plan (NCBMP) was adopted in
2007 by the Nevada County Transportation Commission (NCTC). The NCBMP
provides a "blueprint for developing a bikeways system that includes both on-
street and off-street facilities as well as support facilities and programs throughout
the County." The update was completed in cooperation with the Town to ensure
consistency between the planned local system and the planned Nevada County
bicycle network.
The Nevada County Board of Supervisors adopted an update to the Western
County Recreational and Trails Master Plan in 2010, and NCTC completed the
Nevada County Pedestrian Improvement Plan in 2011.The Nevada County Regional
Transportation Plan was adopted in 2011, identifying current and proposed bikeways
16 Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
in the region and stating a goal of developing a coordinating approach with other
local agencies to implement and maintain bicycle facilities.
Placer County Regional Bikeway Plan, Legacy Program&MVCP
Update
In 2001 and 2002, the Placer County Transportation Planning Agency (PCTPA)
developed Bikeway Master Plans for all jurisdictions in Placer County. In 2010,
PCTPA developed countywide maps identifying existing and planned bike routes
in each community.
Placer County also recently updated the Martis Valley Community Plan (MVCP)
for the southeast-neighboring Martis Valley, an important area linking the Truckee
community with the recreational opportunities located within the Valley and the
region beyond, including the north shore of Lake Tahoe. The "recreational trails"
chapter of the MVCP promotes linkages with the planned local Truckee recreational
trail and on-street bikeway network in and through the Martis Valley.
Plan Conflicts
The Master Plan was developed to provide the necessary consistency with both
the General Plan and Downtown Specific Plan(DSP)in all reasonably foreseeable
conditions and circumstances. Due to the fact that all three documents are policy-
setting in nature, however, conflicts may exist. In cases where there may be a
perceived conflict between the Master Plan policies and either the General Plan and/
or DSP policies,the Community Development Director will make a determination as
to which policy prevails.This determination will be subject to the appeal procedures
of the Truckee Development Code contained within Chapter 18.140, Appeals.
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan 17
4 Goals & Policies
Goals & Policies -What are they?
The Master Plan Goals & Policies are important tools. They provided guidance
for the planning process and are used to guide and determine decisions involving
implementation of specific trail and bikeway projects in the future.These Goals&
Policies, in conjunction with the maps and Design Guidelines contained within the
Master Plan and mitigation measures contained within the Environmental Impact
Master Plan Goals Report, will be used to guide the type, design and specific alignment of future trail
& Policies are used and bikeway projects within the community.
to guide the type,
design and specific Identical to the Design Guidelines contained within Chapter 8 of the Master Plan,
alignment of future the Goals & Policies utilize"shoulds" in lieu of"shallsn to provide flexibility in their
trail and bikeway application.A recommendation/action must not significantly vary or contradict the
projects. objectives of the Master Plan, but need not be in absolute conformity with each
and every policy or goal of the Plan.
Organization & Format
The Master Plan Goals&Policies are organized in three distinct groups—Planning,
Development and Management.The Master Plan goals are broad policy statements
of 13 primary objectives of the Plan. The Master Plan policies are more specific
statements implementing the respective goal statement.
The Planning Goals &Policies provide guidance on the type, design and general
location of trail corridors and policy direction on potential use and user conflicts,
relationship of the planned system with private lands, effect upon community
resources, and generating support for the Plan. The Planning Goals & Policies
will be most utilized during the planning and design phases of proposed trail and
bikeway projects.
The Development Goals & Policies provide guidance to be applied during the
construction phase of new trail and bikeway projects. The Development Goals &
Policies also provides guidance for the funding and financing of trail and bikeway
project construction and policy direction on the reservation and protection of trail
corridors associated with new commercial and residential development within the
Town.Further,the Development Goals&Policies generally set forth the necessary
planning process for new trail and bikeway projects to ensure a well-considered
project and consistency with the Master Plan.
The Management Goals & Policies are equally as important in considering the
development of a trail or bikeway project.It is critical that proposed trail and bikeway
18 Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
projects consider, plan and provide for efficient and continued management and
maintenance of the project to ensure its long-term success,
Planning Goals & Policies
Planning Goal 1 -Trail and Bikeway System
Planning Goal 1:
The trail and bikeway system should provide a full range of safe and convenient Trail and Bikeway
recreation and alternative transportation opportunities for multiple users. System
Policies
• The system should be planned for multiple users wherever possible,
considering user safety, environmental and physical constraints,and land
use compatibility.
• The system should be planned primarily for non-motorized use, recognizing
the need for motorized use on some trail segments when (i) alternative
routes are unavailable, (ii) necessary to access planned or existing
public motorized recreation and (iii) consistent with the safety, land use
compatibility and environmental protection goals of the Plan.
• The alternative transportation system should create logical and safe
linkages within the Town transportation network and frequently connect
with those portions of the system planned for recreational use.
• The system should provide opportunities for winter use where appropriate,
considering environmental conditions, availability of access and parking,
safety and maintenance needs.
• The system should be accessible to the physically challenged wherever
possible.
Planning Goal 2 — Connectivity and Continuity Planning Goal 2:
Connectivity and
The trail and bikeway system should link the Town's historic downtown, residential Continuity
and commercial areas, and recreational, educational, natural and historical
resources utilizing public and private lands as necessary and appropriate.
Policies
The system should:
• Utilize existing public lands, public easements and other public rights-of-
way wherever possible.
• Utilize established routes and boundaries and existing natural corridors
wherever possible.
• Be planned through private lands when necessary to(i)ensure connectivity
and continuity of the system, (ii) provide access to resources or (iii) link
the system with major access points.
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan 19
• Be considerate of bisecting property with no or limited development
potential.
• Consider the aesthetic value of the surrounding landscape and incorporate
interest into the system by providing access and views to interesting sites,
prominent features and other scenic resources.
• Avoid existing or future negative visual impacts, unnatural alignments,
corridors adjacent to incompatible land uses and areas with little
recreational and/or aesthetic value.
• Include easily accessible and highly visible access points providing
recognizable and safe gateways into the system.
• Incorporate an on-street bikeway network providing a safe, convenient
and effective alternative to the automobile for bicycle traffic within the
Town and linked with existing and planned regional bikeway systems and
transit facilities.
Planning Goal 3 — Design
Planning Goal 3:
Design Trail and bikeway design should adhere to a consistent design format to promote
the development of a safe, recognizable and uniform system in keeping with the
mountain character of Truckee.
Policies
• The system should incorporate a consistent design between trail segments,
but allow enough flexibility to adapt to changing community needs and to
promote creative adaptations to achieve superior outcomes.
• Trails should be of the highest quality design,yet cost-effective,functional,
low impact and easily maintained.
• Trail design should be based upon the character of the corridor and
surrounding lands,the intended and varying needs of the user(s),and the
expected volume of use by both residents and visitors.
• Supporting system facilities should complement the natural landscape and
be located closer to existing developed areas.
• Alignments should primarily be dictated by natural landforms,features and
destinations, not man-made features.Trails should seem as if they are an
integral part of the environment,conforming to the natural landscape and
seeking the least resistant and most interesting path.
• Trail design should reflect the projected type of user and volume of use,
including the use of separated and hard surfaced trails where appropriate.
• Trails should be designed to be safe given the expected type and volume
of users.
• The bikeway system should be designed to minimize conflicts with vehicles
and other users, utilizing the standards contained within the CalTrans
Highway Design Manual, Chapter 1000, Bikeway Planning and Design.
• Class I Bike Paths and Class II Bike Lanes should be implemented
wherever feasible and appropriate,considering the projected type of user
20 Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
and volume of use.
Planning Goal 4— Private Lands
Planning Goal 4:
The Town, appropriate public agencies and community groups should work Private Lands
collaboratively and cooperatively with affected private landowners to effectively
implement the goals of the Plan.
Policies
• Private landowners providing trail dedications should inherit no additional
liability and be provided the same liability protection afforded to public trail
ownership entities.
• One or more public entities should accept private land dedications and the
responsibility for public use liability.
• Private landowners providing public trail and bikeway alignments should
have the ability to restrict the types and/or times of use to minimize land
use conflicts when such restriction is consistent with goals of the Plan.
• Existing developed areas should be encouraged to provide lands within
their respective developments necessary to provide a through connection,
connecting spur or supporting facilities contributing to the continuity of the
system.
• The Town should work jointly with responsible agencies, Truckee Donner
Land Trust, homeowner's groups and other interested community groups
to develop a land acquisition program to facilitate the acquisition of private
lands necessary to establish a continuous system, employing a variety of
equitable and innovative acquisition methods and using the most cost-
effective methods available.
Planning Goal 5 — Land Use and User Conflicts
Planning Goal 5:
The trail and bikeway system should be planned to minimize land use and user Land Use and User
conflicts to provide a safe and enjoyable experience for the user. Conflicts
Policies
• Trail corridors, alignments, and design details should be reviewed by
responsible emergency service providers to ensure adequate emergency
access to the system.
• A post planning emergency response plan should be developed by the
Town of Truckee and responsible emergency service providers and
implemented prior to development of the system.
• Highly congested areas, particularly with automobiles, should be avoided.
• A user education program should be developed and promoted throughout
the system to encourage proper trail use and etiquette.
• The system and associated facilities should have minimal impact on
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan 21
adjacent private and public lands and preserve the right of privacy for
these lands.
Planning Goal 6—Community Resources
Planning Goal
6: Community The trail and bikeway system should seek to access, protect and enhance the
Resources natural and historic resources of Truckee.
Policies
• The protection of Truckee's scenic, natural, historic, cultural, geologic,
open space,wildlife,floodplain and wetland resources should be a primary
consideration over other goals of the Plan.
• The system should seek to access and pass through a variety of
ecosystems and natural and historic resources when the presence of the
trail and its users does not adversely affect these resources.
• Trail corridors containing sensitive or fragile environmental resources and
habitats should be avoided.
• The system should provide for educational opportunities and experiences,
including educational facilities such as interpretive signage and kiosks.
Planning Goal 7— Plan Support
Planning Goal 7:
Support Community and responsible agency support is critical to successful implementation
of the planned trail and bikeway system. Open and consistent involvement and
education in the final planning and implementation of the Plan should be encouraged
and regularly provided.
Policies
• A public education program encouraging public involvement and promoting
the benefits and opportunities of the planned system should be developed
to encourage use and support of the system.
• Public support for the planned system should be promoted through
visible and expedient implementation of the Plan, including the phased
construction of trail and bikeway segments to facilitate incremental
completion of the system.
• User feedback should regularly be sought to monitor the success of the
system and to identify areas for improvement.
• The Town and responsible agencies should seek opportunities to present
and promote the goals of the Plan to all interested agencies and community
groups.
Development Goals & Policies
22 Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
Development Goal 1 - New Development
New development should provide for trail alignment reservations,dedications and/ Development
or construction when trail corridors are identified within the Plan through these Goal 1: New
private lands. Development
Policies
• New development should be reviewed by all responsible agencies for
potential conflicts to planned connections.
• The Town should work with Nevada County and Placer County to review
development proposals outside the Town boundaries to ensure the
protection of future connections with existing and planned regional trail
and bikeway systems.
• New development should provide dedications, reservations or other legal
land entitlement when necessary to implement the overall goals of the
Plan, including adequate area for the planned trail and bikeway design,
supporting facilities, construction and environmental protection.
• Incentives and innovative public/private partnerships should be developed
and provided to new development to promote the funding and incremental
construction of the trail and bikeway system by private development.
Development Goal 2 — Funding
Development
All available funding sources should be identified and diligently pursued for all Goal 2: Funding
projects implementing the goals of the Plan.
Policies
• All sources of funding, both public and private,should be sought to support
the planning, development and management of the system.
• The Town should establish an interagency and multi-partner fundraising
committee with the objective of identifying and obtaining funding for
development of the system.
• Volunteers should be encouraged to participate in trail construction.
Development Goal 3 — Construction
Development
The trail and bikeway system should be constructed consistent with the goals of Goal 3:
the Plan and incorporate measures to ensure protection of the natural environment. Construction
Policies
• Areas disturbed during trail construction should be re-vegetated and
restored to their previously existing natural condition.
• Best Management Practices should be utilized for all trail construction
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan 23
to prevent increased soil erosion and instability, substantially changed
drainage patterns and negative effects on adjacent lands.
• Every effort should be made to minimize the short-term impact of
construction activities upon neighboring lands.
Development Goal 4— Project Planning
Development
Goal 4: Project Careful project-specific planning is necessary to ensure consistency with the goals
Planning of the Plan and should be made a mandatory element of all trail and bikeway
construction projects.
Policies
• Pre-construction project planning meetings should be conducted with the
responsible agencies to consider the feasibility of construction, including
the identification of any necessary special design features, unusual
constraints and costs, and sensitive environmental resources.
• A technical review advisory body should be established to ensure the
construction of proposed projects consistent with the goals of the Plan
and to consider and make recommendations on proposed projects to the
decision-making entity.
• A public forum should be established, in cooperation and coordination
with local and regional responsible agencies and community groups,
to encourage community and affected landowner participation in the
preparation and review of proposed projects and their management.
Management Goals & Policies
Management Goal 1 - Stewardship
Management
Goal 1: Cooperation and coordination with both public and private entities should be
Stewardship established to ensure the careful and responsible management of the trail and
bikeway system.
Policies
• Every reasonable effort should be made to responsibly manage and
minimize potential long-term impacts upon neighboring property owners
associated with use of the system.
• Maintenance and management responsibilities should be generally defined
for the system as a whole and specifically defined for individual segments
as part of the project approval process.
Management Goal 2 - Maintenance
24 Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
Quality and consistent long- and short-term maintenance of the trail and bikeway
system is paramount for the success of the system.
Management
Policies Goal 2:
Maintenance
• A public maintenance entity should be identified and established prior to
the development of trail and bikeway projects.
• The necessary maintenance and management needs and responsibilities,
the future maintenance needs, the likely management issues and the
availability of current and future management resources should be identified
prior to development of the system.
• Regular system maintenance and frequent inspections should be ensured
to prevent incremental degradation,ensure continued safety and promote
the maximum life of individual segments and the system as a whole.
• Volunteers should be encouraged and volunteer programs established to
help with the long-term maintenance of the system.
• Existing developed areas should be encouraged to maintain those portions
of the system and supporting facilities providing the most direct benefit to
their respective development.
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan 25
S On-Street Bikeways
Purpose & Intent
A linked network of on-street bikeways is crucial to provide local residents and
visitors to the area an alternative to the automobile as well as providing a recreational
• 4- opportunity for bicyclists and pedestrians. The intent of the planned on-street
bikeway system is to reduce automobile trips by providing safe and convenient
= routes linking the many residential neighborhoods,commercial districts,and public
facilities and services.The on-street bikeway network is also designed to connect
_:. _ frequently with the planned recreational trail system consistent with the policies of
Master Plan Planning Goal 1 (see Chapter 4, Goals& Policies).
Types of Bikeways
Donner Pass Road at Donner
Lake(Class II Bike Lane) Two classes of bikeways are considered within the Master Plan, each providing
an opportunity for alternative transportation and/or recreation within the town-
maintained roadway system. A third class, Class I bike paths, also contribute to
the overall bikeway network, however are defined by their off-street/separated
design commonly utilized for recreation and therefore discussed within Chapter
6, Recreational Trails.
o-� Consistent with Planning Goal 3, Class II bike lanes are the preferred class
of bikeways as physical site conditions allow. Recognizing the many physical
constraints existing in Truckee's mountain setting, Class Ill bikeways are all
1 •.r , necessary and acceptable under certain conditions and locations. The planning
and use of either bikeway facility should always consider user safety by minimizing
conflicts with vehicles, both traveling on the adjacent roadway and movements in
Figure 5.1 Class II On Street and out of parking areas.When planning either bikeway facility, potential conflicts
Striped&Signed Bike Lane with or the resultant elimination of on-street parking should be carefully evaluated,
particularly within the Downtown Truckee area where parking is at a premium.
Class II bike lanes have primarily been planned for major arterials, collectors and
highways consistent with the character(higher vehicle speeds,wider street sections)
o- and use(larger traffic volumes,regional/commuter traffic)of these roadways.Class
CatII Bike facilities should be developed where average daily traffic exceeds 3000 5000 vehicles. Key factors to consider with a class I I facility include available width
of curb lane, available shoulder, drainage conditions, environmental conditions
adjacent to the roadway, pavement quality, and on street parking. Approximately
44 miles of Class II bike lanes have been provided for within the Plan.
Figure 5.2 Class III Signed Bike
Route Class Ill bike routes have been planned on residential serving roadways
characterized by residential neighborhoods and slower vehicle speeds. Class III
26 Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
Bike facilities are most suitable on low volume streets, typically with an average
daily traffic of less than 3000 vehicles. Approximately 32 miles of Class Ill bike
routes are included within the Plan.
On-street bikeways will necessarily follow the design standards of the California
Department of Transportation, including minimum widths, pavement striping,
surfacing materials and signage. The specific design standards applicable to all !�3
Class II and Class Ill bikeway facilities are included within Chapter 8 — Design
Guidelines of the Master Plan.
Class I Bike Path Design Criteria
Although primarily discussed within the following Chapter 6, Recreational Trails, ,
section of the Master Plan, Class I bike path facilities also provide an alternative
transportation and recreation benefit for bicyclists. A feasibility analysis of the Alder Creek(C ass III Bike
opportunities and constraints involved in implementing a Class I bike path in lieu Laine)
of either a Class II bike lane or Class Ill bike route should accompany any new
on-street bikeway proposal considering the following factors:
Key Opportunities:
• Improved safety
• Anticipated level of use and public support
• No other alternative present, insufficient width on street for Class II route
• Direct connection to key destinations.
• Completes a missing link/gap closure. '` ?
• Presence of a linear corridor such as a utility easement, undeveloped street •
•
right-of-way, abandoned rail corridor, or waterway(river or aqueduct)
Key Constraints:
• Sensitive environmental conditions present
• Property ownership and use rights
• Exclusive or shared use of right-of-way •
• Costs (for both right of way acquisition as well as development)
• Anticipated level of use
• Maintenance and emergency vehicle access
• Adjacent property impacts and level of public support
List of Streets Pioneer rai ass I :i e
Lane)
The following streets have been identified within the Plan(see Appendix D, Exhibit
2, On-Street Bikeway Map)for improvement to either a Class II bike lane or Class
Ill bike route:
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan 27
Class II Bike Lanes Class Ill Bike Routes
Alder Creek Road (west) Alder Drive (portion)
Alder Drive (portion) Alder Creek Road (east)
Brockway Road (State Highway 267) Basil Avenue
Bridge Street Beacon Road
Donner Pass Road Bull Pine Trail
Dorchester Drive Deerfield Drive
East River Street Donner Lake Road
Glenshire Drive Donnington Lane
Martis Valley Road Hansel Avenue
Northwoods Boulevard Heather Road (portion)
Ponderosa Drive Highway Road
Palisades Drive Lausanne Way
Prosser Dam Road Martis Drive
State Highway 89 North Meadow Way
State Highway 89 South Old Highway Drive
State Highway 267 Bypass Olympic Boulevard
South Shore Drive (portion) Palisade Street
Southwest River Street Pine Forest Road
West River Street Pine Street
Poppy Lane
Rainbow Drive
Rocky Lane
St. Albans Place
St. Bernard Drive (portion)
Schussing Drive
Sierra Drive
Somerset Drive
South Shore Drive (partial)
Tamarack Road (east)
The Strand
Thomas Drive
Woodbridge Ln. (portion)
I
28 Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
6 Recreational Trails
Purpose & Intent y
Recreational trails are intended to primarily provide recreational opportunities, but
also can provide opportunities for alternative transportation dependent upon their
design and location, The large majority of planned recreational trail segments are
soft surface trails,consisting of a decomposed granite,gravel or rough graded trail ;':
surface dependent upon each specific site condition and projected use(see Figure Soft Surface Trail
6.2).Some recreational trail segments are planned as a Class I bike path,separated
from the roadway and designed with a minimum 8' wide hard surfaced path.
Types of Recreational Trails
In most applications, recreational trails involve the use of soft surface trail surfaces.
Recreational trails will encompass a wide variety of designs, ranging from rough-
graded dirt single-track trails to wider decomposed granite or gravel paths.The type,
width,and surfacing of recreational trails will be dependent upon the anticipated use Figure 6.1 Typical Class I Bike
and user of the individual trail segment. Class I bike paths, defined as a separated Path
(from the roadway)paved surface path, are also considered within the recreational
trail classification. Consistent with Master Plan Planning Goal 3, Class I bike paths
are the preferred type of recreational trails due to their capability of supporting
multiple types of users, although not practical for all trail segments due to a less
intense projected use and/or physical site constraints.
,, ,„
Approximately 57 recreational trail miles are included within the Plan, mapped as
"green lines"on the Local Map(see Appendix D,Exhibit 1).A description,anticipated
primary use, intended connection(s), and identified opportunities/constraints for
each individual planned recreational trail segment is included within Appendix B,
Exhibit 1, attached to this Plan. Figure 6.2 Soft Surface
Recreational Trail
Dependent upon the projected use and user demand of each individual recreational
trail segment(and criteria discussed within Chapter 5, On-Street Bikeways), Class
I bike paths may also contain a separated soft surface trail to provide for use by
walkers, joggers and equestrians. This type of trail section accommodates the
widest variety of trail users consistent with the goals of the Master Plan and is Ili
generally associated with the most highly traveled trail segments. Site conditions lllr
and resources permitting, a Class I bike path with a separated soft surface trail is
the most desirable recreational trail section. A Class I bike path connecting (and
interconnected)east to west(i.e.,Segment 33)and north to south(i.e.,Segment 25)
will provide the best opportunity for linking the most people and places throughout Figure 6.3 Class I Bike Path
with Soft Surface Recreational
the community. Trail
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan 29
The recreational trail segments following the planned Tahoe Donner 3rd access
route are envisioned as a Class I bike path, with or without a soft surface trail
element as detailed in Figure 6.3. The community vision for the trails segments
along or near the Truckee River and Donner Creek (Segment 33, 19, 14, 9, and
6) is a trail for both alternative transportation and recreational purposes. The
. segments will be designed and constructed as a Class I bike path with a soft
• 9 9 P
. surface recreational trail.
Corridor vs. Alignment Planning
Truckee River Legacy Trail Development of the Master Plan is based upon a'corridor'planning methodology.
The mapped recreational trail segments (green lines on map) are intended to
illustrate planned connections between one point and another contained within
a broad corridor linking the two points (see following DT - Glenshire graphic). A
detailed alignment analysis, involving the use of area-specific environmental and
topographic information, of each planned recreational trail segment is beyond the
scope of this Plan.
Cg) —_1.11--------'—'-::----.:: :/:
Figure 6.4 Alignment(specific)
Planning ^ -f}-_
Oq
All segments are based upon a general understanding of the physical conditions
l of the corridor.Some segments are more specific than others due to their intended
utilization of existing rough graded roads, informal trails, previously planned trails
GROW or obvious natural constraints consistent with the goals of the Plan.
i'
i,
y)1 Specific'alignment'planning for each segment is the necessary next step,involving
-"'-r`' a much more detailed study of the opportunities and constraints existing within
� , each corridor. This review will entail detailed plans (see Chapter 9 - Design &
,' / Development),environmental analysis(see Chapter 13-Environmental Document)
F� and public review utilizing the Master Plan Goals&Policies and Design Guidelines
to determine the best possible trail alignment considering all of the many design
and environmental factors.
Figure 6.5 Corridor(specific)
Planning
30 Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
7 Support Facilities & Programs
Introduction
A successful recreational trail and on-street bikeway network requires more than
simply constructing trails and striping bike lanes. Facilities in support of the planned
comprehensive system such as trailheads and parking areas,restrooms and bicycle
racks will be necessary to promote use of the system. Educational programs
promoting safety and responsible use of the system will also be necessary as the
system expands and the intensity of use increases.
Trailheads
Trailheads without formal parking areas are intended to primarily provide access
to individual trail segments and the larger system by foot, equestrian or bicycle.
Trailheads are often located within very close proximity to residential areas and
easily accessible to nearby residents. If any vehicle parking is available in these
areas, it is informal parking on the shoulders of the adjoining roadway or located
nearby in existing public parking areas. A formal, but simple trailhead should
accompany every entrance into the planned recreational trail network.
Trailheads should be designed to be visible from the roadway and, at the same
time, be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood.They should be attractive,
inviting, safe and easily accessible. A small use area near the trailhead should be
provided for informational signs, trash containers and equestrian facilities when
equestrian use is anticipated for a particular trail segment. Trailhead features
such as lighting and restrooms should not be included in trailhead areas without
vehicle parking to ensure compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood. Figure
8.28 contained with Chapter 8, Design Guidelines, illustrates a basic trailhead
configuration as guidance for the design of trailheads.
Trailheads with Parking Areas
Trailheads with areas for vehicle parking in close proximity to on-street bike
lanes/routes and recreational trail segments are necessary in support of the
planned system. Trailheads can include a small parking area or larger parking
area dependent upon the anticipated demand and surrounding land uses. The
illustrated design guidelines contained within Chapter 8, Design Guidelines, of
the Master Plan includes graphic examples of both small (Figure 8.30) and large
trailhead parking areas.
Within the Plan,trailheads with vehicle parking areas have been primarily identified
within existing areas utilized for parking, including existing publicly-maintained and
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan 31
owned parking areas such as:
• West End Beach
• Donner Memorial State Park
• Meadow Park
• Truckee River Regional Park
• United States Forest Service, Truckee District Offices
Additional parking areas are commonly and appropriately utilized throughout the
community,although unimproved and informal.These areas present an opportunity
for improved parking or staging areas with minimal additional environmental
disturbance or surrounding use conflicts. Examples include:
• Negro Canyon
• Termination of South Shore Drive
• Commemorative Emigrant Trail at Highway 89 North and Alder Creek Road
• Prosser Village Interchange
• Phase I Legacy Trail at East River Street
• Glenshire Bridge
• Glenshire/Cambridge Estates Meadow at Glenshire Drive
Additional opportunities for parking will become available with the construction of
public facilities such as the Truckee Donner Recreation and Park District-sponsored
Community Sports Park and schools. Areas of the community slated for large
development such as the Old Mill Site and Historic Hilltop area also will provide
for public parking opportunities as required by Downtown Specific Plan policy
applicable to these areas.
Restrooms
The Master Plan does not specifically provide for the locations of new public
restroom facilities in support of the planned trail and bikeway system.The Downtown
Truckee Specific Plan (see Volume II, Policies & Programs, Chapter 6, Public
Services&Facilities) includes provisions for the establishment of public restroom
facilities in the Downtown area, centrally located within the boundaries of the
Plan and integral to the planned system. Restroom facilities have been planned
within the public parks (i.e., Truckee River Park), newly constructed or expanded
civil/public buildings (i.e., Train Depot, relocated Town Hall site), significant new
development areas(i.e., Mill Site and Hilltop Master Plan areas)and public parking
areas envisioned with the Downtown Specific Plan.
Additional or expanded restroom facilities will be necessary on either end of the
Plan boundaries to supplement the concentration of restrooms in the Downtown
area. Public restroom facilities existing within the Donner Memorial State Park and
West End Beach should adequately accommodate users of the planned system with
32 Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
minimal expansion. A public restroom facility(s) located within the eastern portion
of the community will be necessary, most appropriately in close proximity to the
Glenshire subdivision and associated with a newly constructed vehicle parking or
staging area in support of the planned system. Public restrooms planned as part
of the Truckee Donner Recreation and Park District-sponsored Community Sports
Park can be used for users of the system connecting with the Martis Valley.
Bicycle Parking & Changing Facilities
The availability of bicycle parking facilities throughout the community is crucial to
promote bicycling as an alternative to the automobile. Easily accessible and secure
bicycle racks equivalent to five percent of the required vehicle parking spaces
are a requirement for all new commercial development and larger multiple-family
residential development in Town(see Town Development Code,Section 18.48.090,
Bicycle Parking and Support Facilities) and encouraged for all public facilities.
Standards for bicycle parking facilities are included within the Town Development
Code and supplemented by the guidelines contained within Chapter 6, Design
Guidelines, of the Plan (see Figure 8.25 and accompanying text).
Shower and locker facilities are encouraged for all new development projects
within the Town. The Town Development Code promotes the use of showers and
lockers by providing an incentive for new development projects which include
these facilities. Incentives can include a waiver or modification to any development
standard, granted only when a reduction in the project-generated vehicle trips can
be demonstrated by the project proponent.Although any development standard may
be reduced or waived as an incentive, a reduction in the required vehicle parking
spaces will be most common due to the direct relationship between the inclusion
of shower and locker facilities and vehicle traffic reduction.
Multi-Modal Connections
Multi-modal connections are especially important in the region due to barriers for
continuous bicycle travel such as topography or lack of existing bikeway facilities
from one region to another. The Truckee Transportation Center located in the
heart of Downtown Truckee within the historic train depot, currently serves as the
sole multi-modal transfer location in Truckee.The Center provides transfer service
for both the Truckee Trolley and Tahoe Area Rapid Transit public transportation
services, both of which utilize bike racks on their vehicles for bicycle and transit
rider convenience. Both transportation services should be encouraged to maintain
and expand the ability for bicyclists to utilize public transit.
Another important and currently deficient component of ensuring that bicyclists can
take advantage of transit services is the availability of transfer stations with secure
bicycle parking. Bicycle racks or locker facilities located within the Transportation
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan 33
•
Center will help promote bicycle-transit use as an alternative to the automobile.
Although no formal park-and-ride lots exist in the area, Census data suggest that
many eastern Nevada County residents participate in ridesharing utilizing informal
or commercial parking areas. Bicycle racks or locker facilities located within these
parking areas will also help to promote bicycle use.
Safety & Education
Programs educating and promoting safe bicycle travel and use for both adults and
children are an important to the long-term success of the planned system. Since
1990, the California Highway Patrol (CHP) — Truckee Substation has organized
safety courses throughout the community promoting roadway and bicycle safety. In
cooperation with non-profit community groups,the CHP has also sponsored annual
"bicycle rodeos" in the Truckee and North Lake Tahoe region. The CHP programs
are supplemented by routine enforcement and distribution of bicycle safety and
law literature produced in cooperation with the American Automobile Association.
Under contract with the Nevada County Sheriff's Office (NCSO), limited bicycle
safety and education programs were offered to the Truckee community. A local
bicycle safety and education program was implemented for two years commencing
in 1997 under the NCSO Traffic Division,however lapsed due to lack of grant funding
supporting this program. A renewed commitment to bicycle safety and education
was made an integral component of the Truckee Police Department in 2001.
The Truckee Donner Recreation and Park District also promotes safe bicycling
through safety signage along all district-maintained trails and includes a safety
education component within their bicycle maintenance course offered every
summer.
Additional safety and education programs for both bicyclists andlor equestrians
are provided through the United States Forest Service-supported Tread Lightly
Program, Truckee Junior Horseman, Luke Schafner Foundation, Safe Routes to
Schools, Share the Road Program and the International Mountain Bike Association
(commonly known as IMBA).
The Truckee Trails Foundation (TTF), with grant funding from the Tahoe Truckee
Community Foundation, conducts annual "Safe Bike Days" at the local Family
Resource Center. The purpose of these events is to provide free bike repairs to
lower income families in the Truckee area, some of whom rely almost exclusively
on bicycles as a source of transportation. Bicycle mechanics are hired by the
Truckee Trails Foundation and fix up to 20 bikes at each event. TTF has also
provided free bike helmets to children, along with safe bicycling lessons as they
wait for the bikes to be fixed.
34 Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
Regional Cooperation & Opportunities
The planned connections with regional trail and bikeway networks promoted within
the Master Plan also provides an opportunity to share the lands, resources and
facilities of adjoining jurisdictions to provide supporting facilities and programs.
The benefits of sharing the use and costs of these facilities and programs should
always be explored with adjoining jurisdictions.
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan 35
8 Design Guidelines
Introduction
The Design Guidelines provide general criteria to be utilized and applied to each
specific trail and bikeway project implementing the Master Plan. Realizing that all
sites and conditions are unique,the Design Guidelines provide flexibility by providing
various methods and techniques for the design of a particular trail or bikeway project
proposal. The Design Guidelines purposely utilize "shoulds" in lieu of"shalls" to
provide flexibility and promote creativity during the design and planning phases of
a project.The spirit of the Design Guidelines should be considered more important
than the letter. This is particularly true for recreational trail proposals.
On-street bikeways by their nature must adhere more closely to the letter of the
Design Guidelines. The bike lane and route specifications contained within the
Design Guidelines have been developed for consistency with state and federal
bikeway standards to provide a seamless transition from town-maintained
roadways to state-maintained highways and in support of state and federal funding
opportunities.
Use & Application
Use and application of the Design Guidelines will be important for all projects
proposing to implement any recreational trail or on-street bikeway segment
contained within the Master Plan. The Guidelines are to be used a guide in
promoting a unique and interesting system,while at the same time providing a safe,
recognizable and uniform system in keeping with Truckee's mountain character.
The Design Guidelines have been formatted into two distinctly different groups:
(i) Class I bike paths and on-street bikeways (known as Class II and Class Ill
facilities) and (ii) earthen surface recreational trails. Criteria for widths, surfacing
types and many other design elements are included within this chapter, utilizing
both a numerical and narrative format.Guidelines for disabled access and graphic
illustrations are also included within this Chapter to supplement the paved and
earthen surface guidelines. All are intended to be used during the planning and
design phases of a recreational trail or on-street bikeway project in the community
and applied to the final product. Demonstrated consistency with the Design
Guidelines will be a primary element of the proposal and evaluation process
described in Chapter 9.
Class I Bike Paths & On-Street Bikeway Guidelines
36 Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
National design standards for bikeways have been developed by the American
Association of Highway and Transportation Officials(AASHTO)and the California
Department of Transportation (CalTrans). The CalTrans Highway Design Manual,
Chapter 1000: Bikeway Planning and Design,serves as the official design standard
for all bicycle facilities in California. All designated Class I, II or III bicycle facilities
should conform to these standards. Where facilities do not meet these standards,
they should not be referred to as a Class I, II or III facility.
Design standards in Chapter 1000 fall into two categories, mandatory and advisory. Class 1 Bikeway
CalTrans advises that all standards in Chapter 1000 be followed,which also provides
a measure of design immunity. Not all possible design options are shown in Chapter Variously called a bike
1000. For example, intersections, ramp entrances, rural roads, and a variety of path or multi-use trail.
pathway locations are not specified in the CalTrans Highway Design Manual. Provides for bicycle
travel on a paved right-
Three distinct classifications of paved bikeways are recognized by Caltrans and of-way completely
provided for within the Master Plan. All provide a recreational and alternative separated from any
transportation purpose to varying degrees. Graphic illustrations of the three types street or highway
of paved bikeways are including in Chapter 5, On-Street Bikeways, and Chapter 6,
Recreational Trails,of the Master Plan,The three classifications of bikeways include:
Class II Bikeway
• Class I Bikeway- Variously called a bike path or multi-use trail. Provides for
bicycle travel on a paved right-of-way completely separated from any street Referred to as a bike
or highway. lane. Provides a striped
• Class II Bikeway-Referred to as a bike lane. Provides a striped lane for one- lane for one-way travel
way travel on a street or highway. on a street or highway.
• Class Ill Bikeway- Referred to as a bike route. Provides for shared use with
pedestrian or motor vehicle traffic.
Class Ill Bikeway
In addition to the CalTrans design standards, the following guidelines should be
followed when designing a Class I bike path or multi-use trail: Referred to as a
bike route. Provides
1. Multi-use trails and unpaved facilities that serve a primarily recreational rather for shared use with
than a transportation function and will not be funded with federal transportation pedestrian or motor
dollars may not need to be designed to CalTrans standards. vehicle traffic.
2. Class I roadway crossings require preliminary design review.A prototype design
is presented in Figure 8.4. Generally speaking, bike paths that cross roadways
with an average daily traffic (ADT) of over 20,000 vehicles will require either
signalization, roundabout or grade separation.
3. Landscaping should not be water intensive and consist of native vegetation.
4. Barriers at pathway entrances should be clearly marked with reflectors and
should be ADA accessible (min. 5 feet clearance).
5. Bike path construction should take into account impacts of maintenance and
emergency vehicles on shoulders and vertical requirements.
6. Two foot wide unpaved shoulders for pedestrians/runners or a separate tread-
way should be provided where feasible. Direct pedestrians to the right side of
the pathway with signing and stenciling.
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan 37
7. Provide adequate trailhead parking and other facilities such as restrooms and
drinking fountains at appropriate locations.
Table 8.1 Class I Bicycle Path Specifications
Pavement Type: Recycled Asphalt 3" (75 mm)
Asphalt' 3" (75 mm)
Concrete 2 3" (75 mm)
Sub-Base: Granite 4-6" (100-150
mm)
Gravel 4-6" (100-150
mm)
Shoulders: 2-4" (50-100 mm)
Width: Minimum 1-way Path 5' (1.5 m)
Minimum 2-way Path 8' (2.4 m)
Preferred 2-way Path 10-12' (3.0-3.6 m)
Shoulders: 2-3' (0.6-1.0 m)
Lateral Clearance: 2-3' (0.6-1.0 m)
Vertical Clearance: 8-10' (2.5-3.0 m)
wlEquestrians 8-12' (3.6 m)
Striping: Centerline(none,dashed 4" (100 mm)
yellow,solid yellow)
Edgeline(none or solid 4" (100 mm)
white)
Signing: (See Caltrans Traffic
Manual and MUTCD)
Minimum Cross Slope: 2% 2%
Minimum Separation from 5' (1.5 m)
Roadway:
Design Speed: 20-30 mph (40-50 kph)
Maximum Super Elevation: 5% 5%
Maximum Grades(over 100'): 5% 5%
Removable Bollards(minimum 5' (1.5 m)
spacing):
Lighting(if night use is 5-22 LUX 5-22 LUX
expected):
'Asphalt may be unsuitable for bike paths in stream channels due to asphalt oils.Concrete paving
is recommended in areas where the trail is subject to regular water flow.
2 A 6"concrete thickness may be used directly on compacted native material.
3 Unless physical barrier is provided.
Table 8.2-Class II Bike Lane Specifications
Minimum Widths 5' (1.5m)
Adjacent to Parking No Parking I 4' (1.2m)
Combination Parking Lane 2 11-13' (1.2m)
38 Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
Striping Left side line:solid white stripe 6" (150mm)
Right side line:solid white stripe 4" (100mm)
Approach to intersections Dashed 100-200' (30m-60m)
white stripe:
Signing R81 Bike Lane Sign
• beginning of all bike lanes
• far side of all bike path crossings
• at approaches and far side of all arterial crossings
• at major changes in direction
• maximum 1/2 mile(0.8km)intervals
Custom Bike Route Sign with G33 Directional Arrow and
destination signs(where needed)
• see items under R81 Bike Lane Sign
• at approach to arterial crossings
Pavement Markings "Bike"legend
"Lane"legend
Directional arrow
• See items under R81 Bike Lane Sign
• At beginning and end of bike lane pockets at approach to
intersection
Source: Caltrans Highway Design Manual, Chapter 1000, MUTCD, Caltrans Traffic Manual
' Minimum 3'(.9m)between stripe and gutter joint.
2 Rolled curb 11'(3.3m),vertical curb,12'(3,6m),13'(3.9m)recommended with significant parking
or turnover.
Class II bike lanes should also follow the following guidelines:
1. Caltrans provides recommended intersection treatments in Chapter 1000
including bike lane 'pockets' and signal loop detectors. The Department
of Public Works should develop a protocol for the application of these
recommendations, so that improvements can be funded and made as part of
regular improvement projects.
2. Signal loop detectors should be considered for all arterial/arterial, arterial/
collector, and collector/collector intersections. The location of the detectors
should be identified by a stencil of a bicycle and the words 'Bicycle Detector'.
3. Bike lane pockets (min. 4' wide) between right turn lanes and through lanes
should be provided wherever available width allows, and right turn volumes
exceed 150 motor vehicles/hour.
4. Although not completely unavoidable or inappropriate for all situations (i.e.,
South Shore Drive, south side of Donner Lake), Class II bike lane transitions
into Class Ill bike routes should be discouraged.Alternatives to a Class II-Class
Ill transition should be analyzed, including a reroute of the Class II bike lane
or entire designation as a Class III bike route.
Class Ill Shared Roadway Bikeway Standards
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan 39
Shared roadway facilities are designated as preferred routes for bicyclists. These
routes provide continuity to other bicycle facilities such as bike lanes or shared use
paths. They provide a common route for bicyclists through high demand corridors
and are preferable on low vehicle traffic volume roadways. Typically located on
local neighborhood streets,they provide linkages to high use destinations such as
schools, parks and commercial centers.
Table 8.3-Class Ill Bike Route Specifications
Recommended Amenity/ Placement Purpose
Activity
Bike Route Signs/Directional Start and end points,route Provide clear route
signs changes,intersections definition
Stop Signs,Signals Adjust to give greater priority Safety and efficiency of
to bicyclists route
Adjust utility covers,fill potholes, All existing locations Provide a smooth and
install bike safe drainage grates safe route
Removal of street parking Where roadway width is Improve safety
restricted -
Increased Curb Lane Width 12'minimum, 14'optimum Improve safety
Regular street sweepings Remove debris that are
hazardous
Additional Facilities
In addition to those identified by CalTrans, there are a variety of improvements
that will enhance the safety and attractiveness of streets for bicyclists. All should
be considered in the bikeway planning process and implemented when feasible
to promote the safest environment for bicyclists.
Sidewalks
The use of sidewalks as bicycle facilities is not encouraged by CalTrans, even as
a Class III bike route. There are, however, exceptions to this rule. The California
Vehicle Code states:"Local authorities may adopt rules and regulations by ordinance
or resolution regarding the...operation of bicycles...on the public sidewalks"(CA VC
21100, Subdiv. H). CalTrans adds in Chapter 1000: "In residential areas, sidewalk
riding by young children too inexperienced to ride in the street is common. With
lower bicycle speeds and lower auto speeds, potential conflicts are somewhat
lessened, but still exist. But it is inappropriate to sign these facilities as bikeways.
Bicyclists should not be encouraged (through signing)to ride facilities that are not
designed to accommodate bicycle travel."
Traffic Calming
This includes any effort to moderate or reduce vehicle speeds and/or volumes on
40 Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
streets where that traffic has a negative impact on bicycle or pedestrian movement.
Because these efforts may impact traffic outside the immediate corridor, study of
traffic impacts is typically required.Other techniques include installing traffic circles,
intersection islands, partial street closings, 'bulb-out'curbs, pavement treatments,
lower speed signal timing,and narrowing travel lanes. Traffic circles, roundabouts,
and other measures may be considered for residential collector streets where there
is a desire to control travel speeds and traffic volumes but not to install numerous
stop signs or traffic signals.
Signing and Striping
All bikeway signing should conform to the signing identified in the CalTrans Traffic
Manual and/or the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). These
documents give specific information on the type and location of signing for the
primary bike system. A list of bikeway signs from CalTrans and the MUTCD are
shown in Table 8.3. A typical bike route sign is shown in Figure 8.4.
• Develop a Truckee Bikeway System logo for use on the primary network. This
sign may include a bikeway numbering system that is keyed into a publicly-
produced bikeway map. An example of such a sign is shown in Figure 8.26.
• Installing bikeway signs should be a high priority, and may begin immediately
on Class Ill bike route portions of the bikeway network. Examples of bikeway
signing for at-grade crossings are shown in Figures 8.4. Examples of bikeway
regulatory and safety signs are shown in Figure 8.3.
• Locations in downtown and other employment areas where centralized public
covered bicycle parking can be installed, such as parking lots, should be
identified. These facilities may charge a small user fee and/or be subsidized
by nearby employers.
Table 8.4- Recommended Signing &Marking
Item Location Color CalTrans MUTCD
Designation Designation
No Motor Vehicles Entrances to trail B on W R44A R5-3
Use Ped Signal/Yield At crosswalks:where B on W R9-5
to Peds sidewalks are being used R9-6
Bike Lane Ahead: At beginning of bike lanes B on W R3-16
Right Lane Bikes R3-17
Only
STOP,YIELD At trail intersections W on R R1-2 R1-1
with roads and Coastal R1-2
Bikeways
Bicycle Crossing For motorists at trail B on Y W79 W11-1
crossings
Bike Lane At the far side of all B on W R81 D11-1
arterial intersections
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan 41
Hazardous Condition Slippery or rough B on Y W42 W8-10
pavement
Turns and Curves At turns and curves which B on Y W1,2,3 W1-1,2
exceed 20 mph design W4,5,6,14 W1-4,5
specifications W56,57 W1-6
Trail Intersections At trail intersections B on Y W7,8,9 W2-1,W2-2
where no STOP or YIELD W2-3,W2-3
required,or sight lines W2-4,W2-5
limited
STOP Ahead Where STOP sign is B,R on W17 W3-1
obscured Y
Signal Ahead Where signal is obscured B,R,G YW41 W3-3
Bikeway Narrows Where bikeway width B on Y W15 W5-4
narrows or is below 8'
Downgrade Where sustained bikeway B on Y W29 W7-5
gradient is above 5%
Pedestrian Crossing Where pedestrian B on Y W54 W11A-2
walkway crosses trail _
Restricted Vertical Where vertical clearance B on Y W47 W11A-2
Clearance is less than 8'6" _
Railroad Crossing Where trail crosses B on Y W47 W10-1
railway tracks at grade
Directional Signs At intersections where Won G G7 D1-1b(r/I)
(i.e.Downtown,Train access to major G8 D1-1c
Station,etc. destinations is available
Right Lane Must Where bike lanes end B on W R18 R3-7
Turn Right; Begin before intersection R4-4
Right Turn Here,
Yield to Bikes
Truckee Bikeway Trail logo:at all trail Varies
entrances,major
intersections,major
access points
Trail Regulations All trail entrances B on W
Multi-purpose All trail entrances
Trail:Bikes Yield to
Pedestrians
Bikes Reduce Speed Every 2,000 feet B on W
&Call Out Before
Passing
Please Stay On Trail In environmentally-
sensitive areas
Caution: Storm Storm damaged locations B on Y
Damaged Trail
Trail Closed: No Where trail or access
Entry Until Made points closed due to
Accessible&Safe hazardous conditions
for Public Use
42 Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
Speed Limit Signs Near trail entrances: B on W
where speed limits should
be reduced from 20 mph
Trail Curfew 10PM Based on local ordinance R on W
-5AM
Earthen Trail Guidelines
This section sets forth design and maintenance recommendations for the earthen
recreational trails within the planned system. These recommendations reflect
current thinking with respect to the functioning of low-impact multiple-use earthen
trails. The earthen trail design recommendations are geared towards providing a
high quality trail system that provides trail users with a high quality recreational
experience. Proposed recommendations seek to meet the anticipated needs of a
wide variety of trail users.
Because trails are bare earthen surfaces,erosion from rainfall, runoff,and trail use
can produce significant amounts of sediments,Thus, potential trail impacts on local
water quality should be considered. Trails can also impact groundwater, wetlands,
wildlife, vegetation, community layout, scenic values and land uses. Because of
these considerations,the design recommendations and maintenance program for
the earthen trail system should aim to fulfill the following goals:
• Provide workable facilities for multiple users
• Preserve scenic resources
• Protect water quality, wetlands, floodplains and streams
• Protect sensitive areas, including designated wildlife habitats and plant
communities
• Protect historic resources
• Control erosion and protect exposed soil areas
Define Levels of Challenge for Multi-use Trails
Because the needs of trail users vary, trail specifications can be combined in
different ways to develop level-of challenge categories for multiple use trails in the
trail network. By grouping the trails into three broad levels, decisions can be made
about such issues as whether to provide abundant trail amenities, how wide to
make bridge crossings, and other considerations.
Level I trails, the easiest category of multi-use trails, would be wide, low-gradient
trails with large turning radii, few obstructions, and opportunities for half-and full-
day excursions and/or loops of five miles or less. Such trails would accommodate
the widest variety of uses and are also prime candidates for winter grooming.
Level II trail users would expect to find moderate gradients, possibilities for longer
excursions and more rugged tread surfaces. Level Ill trails would have steeper
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan 43
overall gradients and pitches, narrower and more primitive tread surfaces and
possibly longer routes.
Table 8.5-Trail Characteristics by Level of Challenge
Level I-Easiest Level II-Moderate Level Ill-Difficult
Many trail amenities Moderate grades Sections with steep grades
High level of maintenance 10'vertical clearance Low numbers of people
present
Signage indicating Moderate numbers of people Signage indicating major
destinations within'/:-1 mile present destinations,3-5 mile
distances
Info kiosks on route Good connectivity and Narrow treads
signage to main trails
Close ties with trail heads Narrow treads, 18"wide Non-groomed ski trails
and restroom facilities
Links to major destinations Signage indicating major
and commercial areas destinations within 2-4 mile
distances
Limited sections of moderate
grades
High numbers of people
present
12'vertical clearance
Trail treads—24"wide
Trail blazes always in sight
Trail Design Considerations
Trail design considerations include:gradient,overall elevation gain,sight distance,
overhead and right-of-way clearing, radii for switchbacks and climbing turns, and
tread width and conditions. Trails for different user groups may require specific
design solutions and the people in the various user groups will have certain
expectations about the location of amenities and the level of difficulty desired on
an outing. Key user groups are: hikers, mountain bikers and equestrians.
The following table can be used to develop trail recommendations to meet the
varying levels of public expectation on the trail system.
Table 8.6-Trail Levels& Recommendations
Criteria User Group Easiest Moderate Difficult
Gradient Hikers 10%for 100' 15%for 300' Up to 30%for
500'
44 Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
Mountain Bikers 10%maximum 10%maximum Sustained
sustained pitch sustained pitch grades or
for 100' for 300' pitches greater
than 10%
Equestrians 15%for 200' 25%for 300' 30%for 500'
Switchback and Hikers 2-4'
Turn radii
Mountain Bikers 6' minimum for 3' For speeds of 2'
climbing turn: 5-15 mph:55'
10'
Equestrians 5'
Cleared Tread, Hikers 18"-24",obstacle 12"-18",roots, 12", tread is not
Surface free embedded rocks graded
and some logs
may be left.
Mountain Bikers 24",smooth 12"-24",some 12",varied-
rough sections. some portage
required.
Equestrians 24",with 24",roots and 18",surface
cleared surface, embedded rocks not graded.At
reinforced cross and logs not precipices,trail
drains and removed. base should
puncheon or be minimum
turnpike in bog 48"-60"wide.
sections. Extra trail width
needed in steep
terrain.
Overhead Hikers 8' 8' 8'
Clearing
Mountain Bikers 8' 8' 8'
Equ strians 10' 8' 8'
Right-of-Way Hikers 4' 3'-4' 3'
Clearing
Mountain Bikers 4' 3'-4' 3'
Equestrians 8' (for pack 6'(clearance as 3'—4'wide
clearance for easiest trail)
between large
trees,there
must be 3'on
either side of the
trail center line
30"above the
trail surface)
Sight distance
When sight distance is limited, pullouts should be provided that can accommodate
all types of trail users. For mountain bicyclists it is important to provide sufficient
sight distance for stopping at 15 mph on straightaways and 5 mph on blind curves
and switchbacks.
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan 45
Tread preparation or support
It is recommended that wet areas be avoided when deciding on the location of
any type of trail. If it's not possible to avoid a wet area, foundation rock should be
used as a tread preparation. Under-drainage should be provided for water crossing
trails that are also used during snow conditions.
When preparing the tread of a trail for hikers, gravel can be used in wet spots.
For mountain bike trails, avoid using cobbles and other large materials and use
elongated drain dips over water bars.Equestrian trails should be located on stable
soils and in places where the tread can be drained.
Water Crossings
Some recommendations for water crossings on hiking, biking or equestrian trails
include:
• Hiking: If not on a bridge, the tread (rocks or logs) across water or wet areas
should be a minimum of 12" wide, 24" apart.
• Mountain Biking: Ramps should be provided up to a bridge structure so cyclists
do not have to dismount. Approaches to bridges should be straight.
• Equestrian: Provide, stable, naturally-armored, in-water crossing near bridge
structures, with stinger trail to and from main trail. The water depth should be
less than 24". The trail base through a ford should be 36" minimum. Large
rocks should be removed. If a bridge must be built,it must have a load-carrying
capacity to sustain the maximum number of loaded animals that can occupy it
at one time. The width should be should be 48" minimum and railings should
not snag packs.
Protect water quality, wetlands, floodplains and streams.
Earthen trails have the capacity to change the timing,quantity and quality of runoff
by"short-circuiting" the natural hydrologic system and delivering both sediments
and water directly to streams, wetlands and riparian resources. For this reason,
care should be taken to minimize the impacts of trails on these resources. Practices
to achieve this protection include:
• Avoid wet areas. Trails should avoid wet areas, springs, floodplains, stream
corridors, wetlands, and the lower portions of slopes, especially those that
are north-facing.
• Identify and map water resources within 200 feet of the trail system.
Accurately locating wetlands,streams and riparian areas relative to the trail is an
important element of the trail planning.The location of these potential"receiving
resources" for trail drainage and associated sediments will affect decisions
about placement of trail drainage structures, maneuvering of maintenance
46 Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
equipment, season of work, interception and infiltration of trail drainage, and
disposal of earth materials generated during maintenance activities.
• Minimize crossings of streams and wetlands. Minimize channel crossings
and changes to natural drainage patterns.
• Minimize trail drainage to streams and wetlands. Minimize the hydrologic
connectivity of trails with streams, wetlands and other water resources.
• Keep heavy equipment off wet trails. Avoid operating heavy equipment
on trails when they are wet. Use alternate routes for heavy equipment when
trails are wet.
• Provide crossing structures where needed. Where trails traverse wet
areas, structures should be provided to avoid trail widening and damage at
"go-around"spots.Crossing structures also help protect water quality,wetlands
and riparian areas.
• Establish vegetative buffers between trails, streams and wetlands.
Retain a buffer between trails and water resources by establishing riparian and
streamside management zones(RSMZs),within which trail influences such as
drainage, disturbance and trail width are minimized.
The following practices are important in preventing or minimizing the impacts of
trails in wet meadows:
• Groundwater and surface drainage should not be intercepted, diverted
or concentrated by in-meadow ditches, interception ditches, berms or fill
embankments;
• Meadows should not be used for borrow materials;
• Upland roads should not drain directly to wet meadows;
• Culverts should not be below grade;
• Incision should not be occurring below the meadow surface;
• Discharge of human-influenced drainage should be by level spreading;
• Maintenance of existing ditches should only be carried out when needed and
should not result in ditch deepening or sediment transport to wet meadow;
• Existing ditches should have frequent turnouts and plugs;
• Under-drains should have drop inlets and these should not be undercut;
• Outlet scour pools should not be present of enlarging;
• Headcuts should not be present;
• Upland species should not be invading;
• Meadow should provide base flows to downstream channel during dry season.
Protect sensitive areas,including designated wildlife habitats and plant communities.
In today's regulatory environment, resource-disturbing activities on federal lands
such as construction of new trail alignments are subject to the requirements
of federal ecosystem and watershed planning as well as the Clean Water and
Endangered Species acts. For this reason, decisions made during trail master
planning that concern trail alignment, realignment, decommissioning and some
kinds of maintenance will be subject to environmental impact analysis. A few
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan 47
over-arching principles can provide some guidelines for master planning, and
hopefully, steer many project elements away from the lengthy and expensive
environmental assessment process.
• Avoid new construction in late successional forest stands. Minimize
disturbances in late successional reserve stands of timber, which are
characterized by older trees. often with closed canopy, and where certain flora
and fauna are of concern for protection.
• Utilize disturbed areas. Utilize existing disturbed areas and clearings for
trails and parking facilities, to the extent that such use does not detract from
the area's scenic quality.
• Establish vegetative buffers for non-conforming uses. Industrial and
commercial uses adjacent to trails should be screened by means of fully planted
native vegetative buffers at least 25 feet wide.
• Establish riparian and streamside management setbacks (RSMS).
Vegetative disturbances such as thinning, pruning and felling to improve
canopy openings should be allowed as necessary to maintain existing trails in
RSMSs. However,no heavy equipment should operate outside the trail clearing
limits here. Stormwater discharges from roads and trails to the RSMS should
be minimized to the maximum extent possible. Stormwater discharges that
cannot be avoided should be designed for maximum treatment,sedimentation,
infiltration and level-spreading before entering the RSMS.
• Avoid wet areas unless special construction techniques are used.
• On federal lands,make certain to coordinate with the U.S.Forest Service.
Numerous plant and animal species are protected on federal lands. Where
disturbances for construction or maintenance of the trail system will occur on
federal lands, it will be essential to coordinate with the U.S. Forest Service to
assure that species inventory and protection protocols are followed.
Protect historic resources.
• Leave artifacts and document their location.
• Remove non-historic items. Remove trash and object foreign to the historic
character of the resource.
• Prevent uses that degrade the historic routes.
Control erosion and protect exposed soil areas.
Earthen trails must be sloped so that their surfaces shed water and the materials
supporting the tread remain structurally sound. Favorable drainage gradients are
achieved in numerous ways, including cross-sloping (in-sloping, out-sloping, or
crowning) and by means of rolling dips and water bars. It is essential to limit both
slope length and gradient of road runoff to control erosion.The following drainage
practices are commonly prescribed and are essential to the long-term stability of
earthen trails and protection of the resources where runoff is directed:
48 Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
• Avoid steep trail grades. Avoid steep trail grades in excess of 12 percent.
It is very difficult to control drainage on steep grades, and erosion on steep
grades is expensive to remediate.
• Maintain minimum drainage gradients. Maintain positive surface drainage
by means of out-sloped, in-sloped, or crowned sections having cross slopes
of 3 percent to 5 percent. The road surface should be graded to shed water
before it can run very far down the road.
• Maintain minimum tread width for uses specified. Maintain only the width
of tread necessary to support the designated uses. Maintaining excess width
can be expensive and can generate unnecessary and chronic erosion. Often,
excess width can be successfully ripped and seeded to reduce the amount of
bare earthen surface exposed to erosion.
• Provide drainage at frequencies appropriate for soils and gradients.
Roll grades or undulate the road profile frequently to disperse water from the
tread. Rolling dips and water bars provide essential drainage relief frequency
that prevents erosion from damaging the earthen surface of the trail. Spacing
depends on gradient and the erodibility of the native earth materials.Table 8.7
below summarizes drainage relief frequencies for low standard(non-surfaced)
roads, and can be used as a starting place for determining the necessary
spacing of drainage features on trails.
Table 8.7 - Rolling dip/Water Bar Spacing in Different Materials
Trail Grade Trail Materials
Coarse, Gravelly sands, Silty clays.clays, Friable silts,
rocky gravelly silty sandy fine sandy silty fine silts and
materials gravels,coarse clay,weathered sands,fine
pyroclastics metavolcanics decomposed
granite soils
2-4% 280-300 ft. 145-160 ft. 121-136 ft. 85-100 ft.
6-8% 230-250 ft. 135-140 ft. 106-113 ft. 70-75 ft.
10-12% 175-200 ft. 115-125 ft. 80-97 ft. 50-60 ft.
Source: Geotechnical/Materials Engineering Training Session, by Keller and Vanderhust,
U.S.D.A.Forest Service,Region V., 1982
Notes: Spacing given is to avoid rilling in excess of one inch. In middle topographic position,
reduce spacing 18 feet. In lower topographic position,reduce spacing 35 feet. On SW aspects,
reduce spacing 15 feet.For each 10 percent decrease in slope steepness below 80 percent,
reduce spacing 5 feet.
• Assure that drainage facilities do not pose barriers to bicyclists. Rolling
grade dips must be "transparent" to a bike wheel--that is, elongated, so that
riders roll smoothly through them--and must be angled at 45 degrees or so to
the travel direction.They must fall at about 20 percent of slope so that they are
"self-cleaning," meaning that downslope-moving sediments delivered to them
will be carried off the road in runoff.The mound and dip must be armored with
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan 49
gravel or rock.
• Prevent erosion at outlets of rolling dips and culverts. Drainage outlets
should be armored with rock to prevent erosion. Brush or native organic
debris can be spread in lead-off ditches to slow the velocity of the runoff and
facilitate the deposition of sediments. Even well-functioning rolling dips require
maintenance.
• Install pipes and ditches as a last resort; assure funds are available to
maintain them.Road and trail under-drains(culverts)and associated ditches
should be used only as a last resort to achieve good drainage.This is because
these facilities require regular inspection and maintenance,and severe damage
can result from their failure. See Table 8.7 below for recommendations about
culvert spacing.
Table 8.8- Recommended Distance Between Culvert Cross-Drains (in
feet)
Trail Grade(%) Soils with Low to Moderate Soils with High Erosion
Erosion Hazard Hazard
0-3 500 325
4-6 400 230
7-9 325 160
10-12 280 130
12+ 245 100
Source: Low Volume Road Engineering Best Management Practices Field Guide Keller and
Sherar, USFS.Jan.2001.
• Avoid long sustained grades.Avoid long,sustained grades that concentrate
flows. Install grade breaks to get stormwater off the trail and to allow trail users
a rest.
• Avoid discharging trail runoff onto fill slopes and unprotected soils.
Concentrated runoff from trails can cause damage to fill slopes and to
unprotected soils adjacent to the trail. Discharge sites need to be carefully
selected so that runoff velocity is slowed and sediments settle out. Fill slopes
should be armored where runoff is discharged onto them,or the runoff should
be conveyed in a down drain to a location where sediments can be deposited
and the flow infiltrated.
• Do not let watercourses run down the trail.Descend to a water crossing from
both sides of the channel so that stream flow cannot run down the road or trail.
• Avoid floodplain stream crossings. Cross streams at narrow spots where
there is enough root support for bridge footings,the span will be out of reach
of flood waters and the trail will not be subject to floodplain dynamics.
• Select pipe sizes based on hydrologic data. All culvert sizes should be
prescribed based on the size of the contributing watershed and best hydrologic
data available. if data are not available and the size of the contributing sub-
watershed is 20 acres or less, add the number of acres in the sub-watershed
to 8, then round up to the nearest even inch to estimate the culvert size.
• Avoid maintenance activities that generate sediments. To prevent the
50 Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
generation of sediments from runoff, only road surfaces that need to be
reshaped should be bladed and only ditches that are plugged with sediments
should be cleaned.
• Season of work. Maintenance work that results in disturbed earth should
be delayed until after the wet season. Blading should be done when the trail
surface materials are moist, but not dry.
• Experienced contractors. Maintenance activities should be carried out by
experienced contractors who have had input into the maintenance contracts,
attended a pre-work site meeting, have had training, and are familiar with
practices to protect the local water resources.
• Disposal of excess earth materials. Areas for disposal of excess earth
materials generated during maintenance activities should be designated in
the maintenance plan.
• Management of spoils piles. Excess earth materials that must be stored on
slopes,or where runoff from them can reach wetlands, riparian areas,streams
or other sensitive resources, should be surrounded covered with plastic or a
thick layer of wood chips.
• Stabilize disturbed earth. Areas of disturbed earth should be seeded with
native plant materials and mulched as soon as possible after disturbance.
Disabled Access Guidelines
The Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA)of 1990 prohibits discrimination against
people with disabilities. As a general rule, it is desirable to maximize accessibility
along any public trail system. Specific standards have been developed for buildings
and efforts are being made to develop standards for trails. However,it is recognized
that constructing trails outdoors may have limitations that make meeting ADA
standards difficult and sometimes prohibitive. Prohibitive impacts include harm to
significant cultural or natural resources,a significant change in the intended purpose
of the trail, requirements of construction methods that are against federal, state or
local regulations, or presence of terrain characteristics that prevent compliance.
See the following Table 8.9 providing guidelines for development of accessible trails.
Simple details to be considered in the planning and design process can greatly
enhance accessibility to and within the planned system. Breaks in long grades,
consideration of the user's eye level, minimizing grades at drainage crossings,
providing areas to get off the trail, and appropriately designed seating walls are
examples of simple accessible improvements. Consultation with the physically
challenged on specific design issues prior to the planning and design of trails or
trailhead facilities can be very beneficial and is encouraged for every accessible
project. Details to ensure a barrier free,safe and enjoyable project for the physically
challenged can best be provided by a physically challenged individual(s).
Table 8.9-ADA Trail Development Guidelines
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan 51
•
Item Recommended Treatment Purpose
Trail Surface Hard surface such as,asphalt. Provide a smooth surface that
concrete.wood.compacted accommodates wheelchairs
gravel
Trail Gradient Maximum of 5% Greater than 5%is too
strenuous
Trail Cross Slope 2%maximum Provide positive trail drainage.
but avoid excessive gravitational
to side of trail
Trail Width 5'Minimum Accommodate a wide variety
of users
Trail Amenities, Place no higher than 4'off Provide access within reach of
phones,drinking ground wheelchair users
fountains, ped.
Actuated buttons
Detectable pavement Place at top of ramp before Provide visual cues for visually
changes at curb ramp entering roadways impaired
approaches
Trailhead Signage Accessibility information such as User convenience and safety
trail gradient/profile,distances,
tread conditions,location of
drinking fountains and rest stops
Parking Provide at least one accessible User convenience and safety
parking area at each trailhead
Rest Areas On trails specifically designated User convenience and safety
as accessible,provide rest
areas/widened areas on the trail
optimally at every 300'
Illustrated Design Guidelines
A number of illustrations with accompanying text descriptions have been included
within the Plan to graphically detail the design intent for specific situations and
physical conditions. The illustrated design guidelines are intended to supplement
the text design guidelines contained within this Chapter and to be provided the same
flexibility in their interpretation and application. The illustrated design guidelines
provide additional general guidance for the design and planning process by
providing illustrated concepts or schematics, not construction specifications. The
construction details for each individual trail project must be custom tailored based
upon the specific needs of each project and environmental conditions.
List of Figures—Chapter 8, Design Guidelines
8.1 — Class I. II & Ill Bikeway Classifica- 8.16—Infiltration
tions
8.2 — Class I Bike Path 8.17—Gabion &Geo-Web
8.3 — Shared Class I Bike Path 8.18 — Trail Adjacent to Environmentally
Sensitive Area
52 Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
8.4 - At-Grade Crossing 8.19-Major Crossing of Stream or Drain-
age
8.5 - Regulatory&Safety Bikeway Signs 8.20-Bridge
8.6 - Class II Bike Lane with Narrow 8.21 -Boardwalk
Travel Lane
8.7 - Trail Adjacent to Street 8.22-Culverts
8.8 - Trail Parallel to Roadway 8.23-Log Water Bar
8.9 -Trail in Relation to Street,Residence 8.24-Fences
&Stream
8.10-Trail Adjacent to Development 8.25-Bicycle Racks
8.11 - Trail Concept Through Clustered 8.26-Informational Signage
Subdivision
8.12-Trail Adjacent to Railroad 8.27-Information Kiosk
8.13-Creek Trail on Slope 8.28-Interpretive Sign
8.14-Trail Side-Slope Treatments 8.29-Trailhead without Parking
8.15 - Tread Construction, Stabilization 8.30-Trailhead with Parking Area
&Steps
General Bikeway Classifications
Three basic classes of on-street
bikeways are contained within the Plan
and routinely used throughout the state
as the basis for bikeway planning and
design. Unlike the off-street recreational
trail guidelines contained within the Plan, cuss I Bikeway (Bike Path)
these three classes of on-street bikeways use of i a completely esarans ,t ht o way for the a exclusive
use of bicycles and pedestrians with crosafbw minimised.
and the guidelines and standards for each
established by the California Department
of Transportation are afforded much less a Solid white
flexibility. Consistency with the state-
n0�n r
established guidelines and standards Class II Bikeway(Bike large)
Provides a striped lane for one-way bike travel ono street or
is necessary to provide safe bicycling highwa,
opportunities and cohesive connections N1 • -lie Route Sign
MUER
with adjoining bikeway networks. !,
Class III Bikeway (Bike Rage)
Provides for shored use with pedutran or motor vehicle traffic.
Figure 8.1 — General Bikeway
Classifications
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan 53
Provide Central Line Strip
et Intersection Approaches and at
Areas with Limited Sight Lines
Class I Bike Path
• Pavement width may vary dependent upon the type and intensity of traffic
..,„—kit anticipated, provided a minimum 8' paved section is constructed for dedicated
°= - Class I facilities. Centerline striping should be placed as noted,with the option of
g Y' - a �1til1 - a centerline stripe the length of the bikeway if desired and warranted based upon
r� A� a high volume and/or high speed use of a particular bikeway segment.ii IA
41:1767" 11.1
:./t-" ' ..-I W�2f eft 1Z fl
Clear Pavement Clear
Shoulder Shoulder
Figure 8.2—Class I Bike Path
Shared Class 1 Bike Path
A Class I bike path with a separated soft surface trail creates the best opportunity
,E
A for the most types of users. A 4-6'width is appropriate and necessary for equestrian
i use. A 2' wide soft surface is adequate to accommodate walkers and joggers.
z it In either case, a 2'separation should be provided to minimize user conflicts and
�; , P keep any loose material from entering the paved surface. Tighter turns, shorter
a 11 _' " sightlines, more grade changes and a less linear alignment are all encouraged•
,[201 .-,1/ 1Z e,.NA 46.4.61t/VI for the soft surface trail to provide a more interesting experience.
.....94,/36.1444 s.wr
a Noma Esrti
Figure 8.3— Shared Class I
Bike Path
At-Grade Trail Crossing
Although to be avoided when feasible,
Tr.Mia Signal ControUW
roadway crossings will be necessary for — i _.
some planned segments. Use of existing ®�®- g
roadway crossings are encouraged at ja
controlled road intersections in lieu of M\ . ' rm
new crossings and the associated need
for new crossing control improvements. t." - -= - 11:-
Low volume/speed crossings are
preferred. Consideration for adequate ii - I - �,...
Figure8.4— At-Grade Trail sight-lines and vehicular stopping %' -� •'�`"' '�""
Crossing `1✓ �°
distances is important. Trail crossings �® .._.rma„�°
of private driveways require particular " 4'
attention to user safety, requiring either �� ��
caution or yield (either trail user to seapar"e'd°an°a'"° ;!
driveway user or vice-versa)signs and/
or cautionary pavement striping.
54 Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
Regulatory& Safety Bikeway Signs
Regulatory signs inform bicyclists, pedestrians,equestrians and motorists of laws
or regulations which are not always obviously apparent to the user. Safety signs
provide warning or caution of a possible hazardous condition, like the 'caution:
downhill' bicycle sign show at right. They should be erected at the point of their
applicability(50' prior for a hazard warning), clearly indicate the requirement and
be easily visible and legible. They should be conservatively used to avoid excess
signage and the resultant loss of effectiveness. Uniformity in size,height,location,
design and colors throughout the system is essential to convey a clear, simple
message to all users. All signs should be reflectorized and sized appropriately
based upon the type of message for the intended user(s)
{/ICfClass]Es✓II) r
V •�./ _ ' rn.i. l`:J�TiN PtEn RErt TkPECT
(���� WATCH EOa GOWN P'∎∎=,
IEI1 HE I.G (4) BIKES GEVtR¢A6DitW
BIKE PATN NB.CEPaM1f L//TTCCII AN HR0A0HE
NOv
MOTOR
VEHICLES JPARKING
OR BME LRNk Ant THE WAICHIOH WY
BICYCLES ED _-- ROAD bI✓.
HAM r1ElD TO
BICYCLES .IIltl PEDESHH.Sf
� It C ' '
cars KEEP m C NO
Fi
urn Q IGHE MOTOR
dila O L�r R10Nf q ®
VEHICLES Safety
BIKE LANE ONLY
_..
e LO ��
Class III c
[2 CAUTION wee Its°" \\ //
p®� STOP ))) /
BIKE ROUTE talk t� `AHEAD L \`� w.D�w,,ir]
Class II Bike Lane with Narrow Travel
Lane
Narrow travel lanes aid in reducing
traffic speeds and can more efficiently
utilize existing pavement area. They will
most commonly be applied in residential ,A
neighborhoods and low-traffic commercial
areas. In either case, a minimum 4'wide 4 I SnLEl9Nf.
—I T Ro.a.R,. `5 aL°"tj Figure 8.6-Class II Bike Lane
bike lane should be maintained and 1%4 \
+,.. , .. -' with Narrow Travel
striped I signed consistent with Table 8.4 4.,E } Ih .
within Chapter 8, Design Guidelines Eke s Trove! •M Travel Lane K.L.Lane
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Pian
Y 55
I
Trail Adjacent to Street
A '4 Portions of some trail segments will necessarily be located directly adjacent
lr l� ..
to roadways due to steep slopes, waterways or other physical/ environmental
fi constraints. These expanded sidewalk trails should consider both pedestrian
_ ,t �� and bicycle traffic and safety, utilizing a separate on-street bike lanelroute when
�, - > feasible to accommodate bicycle use. If a separate bike lane/route is not available,
-� ,, .""°"°" the trail must be of sufficient width to prevent conflicts between bicyclists and
pedestrians. In this situation, a one-way bicycle lane/route should be striped/
signed on the opposite side of the street to promote one-way bicycle use of the
sidewalk(with two-way pedestrian traffic).
Figure 8.7- Trail Adjacent to
Street
..aoa
Trail Paralleling Roadway
d an ada la nada..Ma.
as nada r..wM.anan
°°Nat mat'°°^adsadNil, The type and width of separation(from the roadway)provided for trails paralleling
A roadways will vary dependent upon site-specific conditions. High traffic volume
a,'1 roadways will warrant a greater separation than slower speed, low-use roadways.
or
Ilk A separated trail (in lieu of that adjacent to the roadway shown in Figure 8.8) II
protects rock users from roadway snow removal. Native
should be vegetation used and existing features
' , t
; r ( outcroppings, rolling topography) whenever possible and
supplemented by additional landscape screening and buffering to promote a more
""'" """aNaar "" enjoyable and safer user experience.
Figure 8.8- Trail Paralleling
Roadway
Trail in Relation to Street, Residence &Stream
4 itik,_ i Existing natural and man-made features should be used as a buffer between
trails and private property. Where possible locate trails adjacent to the front yards
streets and/or public open spaces rather than adjacent to private back yards.
Un WWI SkaWY.d Swamp
a hlfors 4twn TW d Naidamel
a..l.My
Figure 8.9-Trail in Relation to
Street,Residence&Stream
56 Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
I
Trail Adjacent to Development kiAitil)i p New trail segments located adjacent or in close proximity to existing developed _7G-�'
property(particularly residential)should utilize grade separations,landscaping and kjOitu....,„
/or fencing to help buffer and screen the trail corridor from existing development, y�- -,T N
to minimize the possibility of trespass onto private property and to ensure the �'' R'J
P Y P P P P Y 1�► �^..�.����
°"
maintenance of privacy and security. , ,,, .
Figure 8.10- Trail Adjacent to
Development
Trail Concept Through Clustered Subdivision t
When designing the trail system, consider
the alignment of a primary through-trail with o°`o
secondary spur trails providing access to , p o� ''
individual development clusters. Multiple !;'
connections from each individual residential �,;; Figure 8.11 -Trail Concept
unit with the primary/ main trail should be o° (' o °o Through Clustered 0.discouraged through a well-designed and °a‘❑o❑ ❑ 4 I '-.?°o o Subdivision
- o
easily accessible spur trail(s). Open space
■-_- 1;
areas created with clustered development —^ ---/-----4;
provide the best opportunity for linear o°ao° 0
recreational opportunities such as bike paths °° ° }; 0 00
and recreational trails. `�-----'0 0
/1 o 0 /
Trail Adjacent to Railroad A
A minimum 15'foot separation from the centerline of the track to the edge of the l
trail must be maintained and a greater separation preferred for aesthetic and '"...,. , t
safety purposes. The amount of grade separation will be an important element in 1 ‘,, IA
determining minimum separation requirements. Vegetation should be retained and 1 1
enhanced to act as a natural visual, noise and safety barrier between the railroad
tracks and trail. Fencing can be used when necessary.
-Esrthy.M„Mn
Figure 8.12- Trail Adjacent to
Railroad
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan 57
Creek Trail on Slope
Locating the trail on the top of the creek bank is the preferred location when
ii;J� : possible.When trail segments adjacent to waterways must be located on a slope,
E� sO90 ' '` the less steep the better. Steep slopes should be avoided. Slope cuts should be•
0.411146 SM 1 f'
� �;;, ✓ PaxE m minimized and existing vegetation preserved to the extent possible by utilizing the
1�'^ , �Ev.:=71"°' natural topography of the site without creating large undulations in the trail surface/
r F:°n' grade/profile. Guardrails should only be installed when warranted due to safety
�"� Vegctcr:on a1 IB"a bnary Enm
nr Edg d ry,
concerns.
Figure 8.13-Creek Trait on
Slope
Trail Side-Slope Treatments
Topographic conditions should be carefully considered to maximize protection of
the trail, minimize supporting trail structures(ie: retention devices)and protect the
surrounding environment.Trail surfaces should be constructed to sheet flow from
the inside to the outside of the trail (ie: outslope) without creating concentrated
flows on the down side of the trail. Crowning can be utilized for steep trails, Side
swales and berms can also be used to prevent water from reaching the trail
surface and provide a lower place on the trail to drain, An inside swale is only
necessary when concentrated or heavy flows may wash onto the trail.Grade breaks,
considering the existing natural topography and utilizing the natural topography,
creating low points in longer stretches of trail on grades can prevent washouts.
Galvanized Metal Stakes.
Size and Spoce as Regwred
2 ft Width Varies 2 ft to Permonentty Stabilize
s' 1Treed �} Tes(8 ft O.C.Max)
^'e � ` I Stokes Must Not Protrude
144r ` r _ Above Logs or Ties
"*^,
Railroad res or Treaded
2'4 Cross Slope--� Logs,6'Diameter or Larger
For Drainage 37
SV�e�,sr
eJ
Swale and Berm Typical Size.Actual Dimension Will Be Determined By Field Conditions
Drainage and Irrigation Systems For All Up Slope Shall Be Designed To Prevent Run-off To Trail
Figure 8.14- Trail Side-Slope
Treatments 2 ft)Tread Width Vane
Exisrr.�yde
<-- -- 3'Minimum Berm
2%Gross Slope For Erosion Control
For Drainage Than 3;iSko
Actual Dimension Will Be Determined By Field Conditions.
Drainage and Irrigation Systems For All Up Slope Shall Be Designed To Prevent Run-off To Trail
S8 Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
Tread Construction, Stabilization &Steps
The stabilization of cuts / fills
created with new trail construction is
necessary to prevent erosion,protect Lease Debris
water quality and to maintain the trail MediMig" "
Slide°° Onto
the Tree Tread
surface. Use of existing vegetation t s: '' •10,47 t:1 IfRr�e Settle to Provide
and revegetation to supplement APlro
Width e(Treed VQlee;' ..•;.:::..: Figure
edge stabilization and retention 1ur:41Tr h►.Troffic Constri•
devices will aid in preventing erosion Trt°d Contraction Steps
and create a more natural trail A.P. WdhM "d
With Meta Stapes 4'a
Y MOc�Td stexee zoo.Mex Ht.z
corridor. Revegetation with native ,
species(unless temporary irrigation Edge 5toblll:atlon
is provided) will be necessary for 8 �T� (°^"When Necessary)
steep disturbed slopes. Slope 1824; te 33�
stabilization materials can consist of ^�rK
wood, rock or indigenous or natural Section plan
materials designed to blend with Railroad Tic Steps For Hiking Trails 3'Min.
the natural surroundings. Vertical
retention devices should only be
used when necessary. Railroad tie sectieh Plan
(or other suitable natural material
such as stone) steps can be used
fro short,steep grades. Shared use
trails should utilize a larger tread versus a reduced 8" tread for pedestrian trails.
Wooden stairs should be constructed of pressure treated or an approved rot
resistant timber.
Infiltration
Careful consideration of water runoff and treatment in the trail design and
•
construction process is crucial to prevent impacts to water quality and to protect
the stability of the trail surface and edges. Infiltration trenches for impermeable
trail surfaces(shown in figure)can be used on a single (side slope) side or both yr
(crowned)sides of a trail dependent upon the design and construction utilized for a ,^44:;4' it; v
err ■E'particular trail segment. Trenches can be used in conjunction with or supplemented
-----f c3
by catch basins located on lower sections of a trail segment. brawl Inf!traticn
Trench
4•perforated
PV ppe
Trail Infiltration Detail
Figure 8.16—Infiltration
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan 59
Ca.var.Tra
""""5""` Gabion Trail Concept&Geo Web
14+' _ ° - Rock-filled wire gabion construction should be used when more-natural shoul• d rip-rap or other retention treatment is not feasible due to physical conditions or
�N-,p Mai C000.0r where native rock is too small or too round for stacking. They can be stacked into
walls or laid into revetment. They are low cost, easily constructed, compatible
with aquatic environments and habitat, require little foundation preparation and
are permeable to water.
r.r Cancrafa Tram
ll,
Ca " 4110,1muia wo-araiaa
Gabior Trail Coaeepf
Figure 8.17- Gabion Trail
Concept&Geo Web
Trail Adjacent to Environmentally Sensitive Area
A Wetlands,floodplains and other environmentally sensitive areas should be avoided
la if at all feasible and provided some degree of separation from the trail. A minimum
1<—
sir.aaar.aa � 111$�
�•w % I�swt of 50'is recommended. Existing vegetated areas are preferred to create the most
• natural and compatible buffer. Fences or other physical barriers should only be
I � .�a�a.a� a �.d 5 used to protect a particularly sensitive environmental resource.
Figure 8.18- Trail Adjacent to
Environmentally Sensitive Area
Major Crossing of Stream or Drainage
Bridges (in lieu of culverts or boardwalks) should be used to cross natural or
man-made continual running water,areas of riparian or wildlife value or when they
Comm Poariga
00,0010.4 provide a user interest and enjoyment. They must be designed for each individual
TW of
aft We
situation and be solid,sturdy and grounded. Due to their association and proximity
Tray
to water,only galvanized hardware,bolts with washers and pressure treated lumber
i0
should be used. Handrails being the exception, requiring a smooth finish. The
Y.*ef 100 design should be pleasing to users and compatible with the surrounding environs.
Abutments should be located as high on the walls of the channel as possible to
Figure 8.19- Major Crossing of decrease their visibility and minimize obstruction of the channel. Bridges should
Stream or Drainage span the entire 100-year floodway.
60 Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
1
Bridges
Bridge surfacing can vary dependent upon anticipated user needs (equestrians,
bicyclists). Natural materials and finishes are encouraged to best complement
and blend with the surrounding environment. Tread width and surfacing may vary
dependent upon user(s) needs, particularly for equestrian use and /or disabled
access necessitating wider widths and better traction surfacing. A recycle rubber
surface can be used when heavy equestrian use is anticipated.
20-or
rIWUN66:,t4
.- 10070:4K.ae brb 1
-I .— � ,:: l Tel s Figure 8.20-Bridges
4
PISA
ICJ µ I,1 �r f
ELEVATION sc2T I ON
I
PLAN
Boardwalk Concept Sectional View
Natural materials should be used to be compatible with the sensitive environment — ——�
commonly associated with the use of boardwalks. Railing should be used only
when necessary to prevent trespass onto sensitive or unsafe areas, otherwise a - A '\4"x4"curb will suffice. Railings should be smooth. Stepping stones can also be •-- —
used for low-traffic, pedestrian only trails to cross stable areas in short stretches, _ � �
typically no longer than 25'.
Figure 8.21 - Boardwalk
Concept Sectional View
Trail Culverts
Drainage crossings should be carefully designed
to avoid the destructive effects upon the trail of . — —,,,„,.,,—
concentrated water flows. Culverts should be '"`°"" _....dequately sized to accommodate projected • .1. 's_. Ti Ti
water volumes and include native stone rock Sect,,,
rip-rap headwalls!outfalls to protect the edges
of the trail and downhill land area. Under _
IF
certain conditions an unimproved swale crossing = _:i` Figure 8.22- Trail Culverts
(very low flows), concrete swale (w/in built ""
environment), stone paving (naturally rocky K" i 4 ,
area,low use) and channelization(occasionally . t fi _t
i Section
wet areas)can be used in lieu of culverts.These „,
treatments should only be used for pedestrian Troll
trails and carefully consider the impact upon the
surrounding wetland ecology.
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan 61
_. Log Water Bar 1
\ '"�45°1r"` Rolling dips can be used in lieu of log water bars, particularly when mountain
5ro 10%Oevnywie '.
��= ' '�Andnrstdoe
' , _, ; . bicycle use is anticipated as they divert water off of the trail with minimal affect
1,•:„.11.1 on trail users. In both cases, installation must carefully consider the cross slope
of the trail and topography of the surrounding area. Rubber water bars can also
f 3N 4 be used for high volume multiple use trails. See also the spacing specifications
contained in Table 8.6.
6'-6'Log
r Trdl Teeod 45 degree
..Drdiegt 0: `1.
ea Rip-R.p
•
Figure 8.23—Log Water Bar
_ Fence Types
Fences should be used sparingly throughout the system and only when providing
a specific benefit to adjoining private or environmentally sensitive lands. A
Sand Wood Fees segment-by-segment fence analysis should accompany each project proposal.
Fence design should directly relate to its intended function—a solid wood fence for
screening and buffering, a split rail fence for property or trail delineation. Fences I
q 1. should be supplemented with existing and / or new native landscaping. Small
fence sections can be used to prevent short-cutting or draw a user to a specific
Two Rail Fence
focal point. A low-lying single rail fence can be used asa reminder for users to
stay on the established trail. Long stretches of fencing should be avoided to
prevent narrow corridors and,where possible, be located on only one side of the
trail. Fences should be no closer than 5'to the trail edge and a minimum width
1 I_ III of 20' provided when fences are on both sides of the trail.
Log Fence
Figure 8.24— Fence Types ��� .;:-r_
Bicycle Racks elr; �= :_;:
A wide variety of bicycle parking devices are
available and acceptable. Bicycle racks should O.
be designed to adequately support and secure
bicycles, be a minimum of 5' in width (each) and A r -
be paved. Racks should be located in easily
accessible and safe locations in close proximity to
Figure 8.25—Bicycle Racks the entrances of both commercial and residential
developments. A physical separation or barrier OW
should be placed between bicycle parking facilities
ri
and automobile parking areas. An enclosed ! �
�
bicycle locker system can also be used for outside ;,
I
longer-term bicycle parking ��
62 Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
Informational Signs
These signs are intended to be used
both as trailhead markers and internally
throughout the system. When used M
as a trailhead marker(in lieu of an hods, Ir.,fIs
information kiosk), the sign should be r;r Lets.,, ,.,,tO,f,j
constructed to a 5'-8' height(dependent
upon visibility)with either single or
double supporting wood posts. Signs r'''r
should be constructed of painted metal ' :: I 1 ,„�,� �» Figure 8.26-Informational
with a wood backing and finished with ! '' Signs
a consistent font, background color and
contrasting border color. Small signs
should be 18"x24", large signs 30"x42"
(exterior dimensions, excluding logo).
Smaller`bollard type' information signs should be used within the system to
provide distance, direction and user information. They can also be used for
small trailheads in lieu of either the post mounted or kiosk signs. The 3"square
information symbols provided within each of the two bollard type signs(12" and
6" square shown) should be constructed of either carsonite or metal, recessed
'/z° deep and epoxyed into place.
Information Kiosk
Kiosks should be placed at major trailhead locations(ie: those with parking)
and occasionally throughout the system to provides educational opportunities.
They should be designed and constructed with natural materials and colors
to best complement the surrounding environment. Height and mass should
be minimized to that necessary to adequate convey the intended message or
information.
Figure 8.27-Information
/i KW, Kiosk
1 I :i. 0 •I! Trail System Logo
11,'� I / D Ea' You Are Here'Mop
i I Troll Rules
�'u Sr
I
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan 63
Interpretive Sign
WOrow jr 36'rofo Signs educating trail users about environmental resources or historic place!
events should be used often throughout the system. Interpretive signs should
' i Fca be placed in close proximity to the area of the message being conveyed,
• maintain an aesthetic backdrop and be anchored to the site with vertical
elements such as larger trees or rocks.
Figure 8.28-Interpretive Sign Trailhead Without Parking
Trailheads without parking delineate
an entrance into the trail network within
areas of nearby public parking or within
residential subdivisions where parking
areas are not necessary or would be T"
Figure 8.29—Trailhead incompatible with the surrounding 4
Without Parking neighborhood. A user information area a• �u I�pmaTiM
should be provided for any informational F`^`� "'
signs or other supporting facilities, F KOh,t;a55
backed with native vegetation, rocks
and fencing if necessary.
Stop aVeld
Trailheads with Parking Area
Parking areas should be visible from the adjoining roadway, but not a
dominating or degrading aesthetic feature. Sites should be chosen based upon
their ability to accommodate a parking area considering its size, topography,
environmental sensitivity and proximity to surrounding land uses. Parking
layout should be organized in a logical and space-saving manner, varying in
design from a simple roadside parking area to a one-way looped parking area
with diagonal parking dependent upon the anticipated demand. Consideration
for equestrian use, including trailer parking and maneuvering, should be made
when designing trailhead parking areas for trail segments accommodating
equestrian use. Graveled or paved parking areas provide superior snow
removal and lessen impact to air quality and should be used in lieu of a dirt
surface for larger parking areas.
-Troll UralManaty.
Twl $Fort wyM of lucs
0[ftraaw atl bnY'in,F,., - T'YI
�W Troy tManmliw
Tre.tlree
Figure 8.30—Trailheads With
�n'
Parking Area /_
Sdemak
u.e aaa um.. . wwkw raw,
Sa Law Paelannol Auras
64 Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
9 Design & Development
Recreational Trail Proposal & Evaluation Process
The Master Plan aims to provide a consistent and recognizable system throughout
Truckee,while at the same time promoting unique and interesting trail designs and
user experiences considering the site(s), trail, user and purpose of the proposed
trail segment within the larger context of the Plan's goals and policies. All trail
projects within the incorporated boundaries of the Town of Truckee will be required
to demonstrate consistency with the objectives f the Master Plan through an
application to the Town of Truckee and/or Truckee Donner Recreation and Park
District.The proposal will be evaluated by a technical review committee appointed
by the both the Truckee Town Council and Truckee Donner Recreation and Park
District. The technical review committee is responsible for ensuring consistency
and implementation of the Master Plan and formulating a recommendation on trail-
specific proposals to the Town Council and/or Truckee Donner Recreation and Park
District for formal consideration and action.Consideration of possible social impacts
upon the greater community and neighboring properties will also be a role of the
technical review committee to ensure the recreational trail segment is compatible
with the not only the physical environment,but also the human environment including
litter, vandalism, privacy and noise.
The evaluation process is intended to guide the development of trails from the
conceptual planning stage to the final detailed trail alignment and construction
specification stage. Initial consultation with the technical review committee is
strongly encouraged.A project proposal addressing all of the planning,development
and management issues of the Master Plan will be necessary. An outline of the
evaluation process, project submittal requirements and Master Plan consistency
checklist(including mitigation measures contained with the Environmental Impact
Report) will be made available for all proponents of a specific recreational trail
project.
The technical review committee is also responsible for reviewing and making a
recommendation to the Town Council and/or Truckee Donner Recreation and Park
District on the adequacy of the environmental documentation necessary for each
individual project. Public notice will be provided for all trail proposals, based upon
the state mandated noticing timelines of the California Environmental Quality Act
associated with the type of environmental document necessary in support of the trail
proposal.A'decision tree'illustrating the recreational trail proposal and evaluation
process has been made part of the Master Plan as Appendix B, Exhibit 4.
What Type of Trail?
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan 65
The Master Plan does not plan for a specific type of design for each of the 43
individual recreational trail segments contained within the Plan.The Plan relies on
the evaluation process to determine the most appropriate alignment and design
considering the objectives and guidelines of the Plan and the ideas,thoughts and
concerns of the community.Community participation in the evaluation process will
be critical to ensure the development of a particular trail segment best suited for
the site, anticipated users and surrounding community.
Preferred Recreational Trail Segments
Prioritization of the many planned recreational trail segments has not been made
an element of the Master Plan. It is the intent of the Master Plan to facilitate the
incremental implementation of the system as new proposals and new development
proposals provide opportunities to do so. No proposal implementing the goals of
the Master Plan will be discouraged.
Some segments, however, have been identified by the community, staff and
Town Council to provide a greater community-wide recreational and/or alternative
transportation benefit than other segments. All things being equal, following are
the segments afforded the highest implementation priority (not in priority order)
based upon the public benefit derived from each respective trail:
Segment 33—Downtown to Glenshire
Segment 34—Downtown to Sports Park
Segment 14&9—Downtown to Donner Lake
Segment 22—Downtown to 89 North Corridor
On-Street Bikeway Proposal & Evaluation Process
A `decision tree' for the on-street bikeway proposal process is illustrated within
Appendix B, Exhibit 5 of the Master Plan. Most on-street bikeway projects, with
the exception of CalTrans initiated projects on state highways, will be initiated by
the Town of Truckee. The town staff is responsible for implementing the on-street
bikeway proposal and evaluation process, involving a varying degree of public
notification and environmental review dependent upon the scope of the proposed
on-street bikeway project.
Many on-street bikeway projects will entail only striping and/or signing of the existing
roadway, a scope of work not subject to the review requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) and provided public notification and review as
a component of the Master Plan public hearings,workshops and advertisements.
Simple signing and/or striping of the existing roadway to implement the Class II
and Class III bikeway contained within the Master Plan will involve no additional
66 Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
formal public notification.
Implementation of other Class II and Class Ill bikeways will necessitate road
widening, intersection improvements or drainage improvements warranting
specific formal public notification and CEQA review. An analysis of the potential
environmental impacts associated with the specific on-street bikeway project will
be conducted by the town staff and, if not exempt from CEQA, the appropriate
environmental document prepared,noticed and circulated.The Town Council will be
the decision body to approve, disapprove or modify the project and make the final
environmental determination. For projects involving widening, street improvements
or private property impacts, construction notice to all property owners adjacent to
the project roadway will be provided by door hangers and/or informational signage
prior to the start of construction.
For all on-street bikeway projects, the Town is committed to following a 'good
neighbor' policy. On-street bikeway projects involving physical impact to private
property owner improvements will be personally contacted by the town staff as
these impacts are identified in the field.This contact is not only intended to provide
notice to property owners of upcoming roadway improvements, but also to open
dialogue with property owners about reasonably available solutions to limit impacts
upon existing improvements. The need for additional public notification will always
be considered for every on-street bikeway project on a case-by-case basis by the
town staff.
Preferred On-Street Bikeway Segments
Implementation of the planned on-street bikeway system will occur concurrent
with roadway improvements projects initiated by the Town of Truckee, private
development and the California Department of Transportation. All efforts should
be made to implement the planned on-street bikeway system concurrent with road
improvement and enhancement projects within the Town.
The planned Donner Pass Road Class II bike lane,from Historic Downtown Truckee
to the west end of Donner Lake, should receive the highest priority. This bike lane
provides the most significant alternative transportation opportunity for the largest
number of people in the community. The planned Donner Pass Road bike lane in
the Donner Lake area also creates a needed bike route to accommodate the large
volumes of bicycle traffic currently utilizing the roadway.
The second highest priority should be given to those bikeways providing a continued
alternative transportation link from Donner Pass Road to outlying residential
communities. The planned Class II bike lanes on Northwoods Boulevard and
Glenshire Drive will provide needed bicycle facilities on roadways connecting
Donner Pass Road with two of the largest residential areas in the Truckee community
and provide a safer environment for bicyclists currently utilizing these two roadways.
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan 67
A third,equally important,alternative transportation connection is needed the length
of State Highway 89 North between Historic Downtown Truckee/Donner Pass
Road and the Prosser area. Similarly, creation of this bicycle facility will provide a
connection with a major residential area(s) and coinciding with a commonly used
bicycle route on the state highway.
The next highest priority should be given to those bikeway facilities providing links
to major commercial and residential areas and recreational opportunities. Internal
connections within each of the many residential subdivisions planned as Class III
bike routes should receive the lowest implementation priority as a supplemental,
not integral, component of the Plan.
68 Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
10 Private Lands
Overview
Successful implementation of the Master Plan will require the protection of existing
trail connections and the reservation of planned trail connections throughout Town.
Although many of the trail corridors are intended to utilize public lands consistent
with the goals and policies of the Plan, acquisition of trail corridors on private lands
will be necessary to successfully implement the Plan. Many options are available
to the Town, public agencies, non-profits and private landowners to ensure the
protection/reservation of these critical trail corridors. The objective of the Master
Plan is to provide a menu of available options to both public agencies and private
landowners, promoting flexibility and creativity in the negotiation process. Careful
crafting of transactions between private landowners and public agencies can and
should produce mutually beneficial results.
New Development — Reservations & Dedications
The preservation of trail corridors in conjunction with or independent of the open
space areas required to be created with new residential development is a requirement
of the Town Development Code. Right-of-way reservations for pedestrian paths,
bikeways and multiple use trails will be required of new residential development
consistent with the General Plan Circulation Element, Public Improvement and
Engineering Standards and/or this Plan. An offer of dedication is required when a
reasonable relationship is demonstrated between the need for the dedication and the
characteristics and impacts of the proposed development. In all cases, a 40' wide
area should be used as a beginning guideline for new development with flexibility
provided for the necessary width dependent upon the site or project specific trail
needs, including possible maintenance, buffering, fencing and landscaping.
The Town Development Code also provides incentives to new development
to encourage implementation of the Plan. Reductions in required open space
area and fee waivers are two specific incentives offered within the Development
Code for public trail reservations and dedications beyond that required of any
new development. Additional flexibility is provided for new development within
the Planned Development provisions of the Development Code, promoting the
highest quality development in concert with the public need and benefit derived
from creative and innovative development proposals. The Planned Development
provisions provide flexibility for the Town Planning Commission and Town Council
in adjusting or modifying any development standard where justified based upon a
resultant superior development project than that which would have occurred with
the strict application of these standards. Reductions in required project parking
and flexibility in internal project circulation layout are two examples specifically
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan 69
cited within the Planned Development provisions and potentially justified with the
reservation/dedication of lands in support of the planned recreational trail and
on-street bikeway network.
Existing Development
In cases where trail corridors shown on the Master Plan intersect with existing
developed areas, the acquisition of lands will be necessary to create connectivity
with adjoining trail corridors. Acquisition can be accomplished through a variety
of forms — outright purchase of property, purchase of easements, donations or
condemnation.All varieties of acquisition will be employed,however always seeking
the most cost effective method to secure appropriate public interest when necessary
and warranted. Public-private negotiations for outright purchase of private lands will
be necessary in some instances, however the purchase of easements or partial/
restricted property right at less cost to the public will be encouraged.
Condemnation Policy Statement
Condemnation, a mechanism provided to government entities by state law for the
purpose of acquiring lands necessary to implement or complete a public need, is
an acquisition tool available to the Town of Truckee and other local government
entities. Although condemnation will remain an available option to the Town, it is
not the preferred or desirable path to implementation of any component of the
Plan. Condemnation is a tool to be used a "last resort" in the event good faith
negotiation is unsuccessful and the private land area in question is vital to the Plan.
If condemnation is a method of land acquisition supported by the Town Council or
other local government entity with condemnation authority,fair market value should
be paid for the property to be condemned.
Beyond the statutory limitations and procedures for the use of condemnation under
existing California law,the Town Council has imposed upon themselves additional
local procedural limitations to ensure property owners are being treated fairly
and that ongoing communication is established and maintained. These additional
procedural steps include:
• Requirements for face-to-face meeting with the property owner(s) and
representatives, the Town's designated negotiator, and the appraiser before
the appraisal process starts at the property to'walk through'the process,solicit
any valuation information the property owner desires to have considered, and
set a date by which the Town valuation process will be concluded.
• Provide a 'plain English' guide to the process for distribution with a specific
individual to answer questions on behalf of the Town.
• Establish an ad hoc 'Appraisal and Acquisition' advisory committee to work
with staff,the appraiser, and the property owner consisting of a Town Council
70 Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
member,a local banker,and a local real estate broker to act as a`reality check'
on the process.
• Establish as policy in this Master Plan that the condemnation will process will
only be instituted after:
• The property owner has received the Town's offer and a copy of the
appraisal upon which it is based and a meeting has been held with
the property owner in an attempt to resolve any concerns.
• The property owner's appraisal (if prepared) will be fully and fairly
considered in the course of such a meeting and good faith negotiations
conducted based upon the two appraisals.
• If no agreement is reached, the advisory committee will be asked
to review the positions of the parties and make a recommendation
as to the appropriate valuation to be provided to the Town Council
concurrently with its condemnation of any condemnation resolution.
• Offer the opportunity for mediation using a jointly selected professional,
prior to Town Council consideration of a condemnation resolution,
assuming doing so will not unreasonably delay the proposed project.
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan 71
11 Maintenance, Monitoring & Security
I
Introduction
As the trail system is implemented, a high standard of maintenance is a key
ingredient to a successful trail system that cannot be over stressed. Beyond the
need for safe environment,the psychological effects of good maintenance can be
a highly effective deterrent to vandalism and littering. As a new neighbor to the
various communities in which the planned trail and bikeway system will pass, the
managing agency(s) has an ongoing relationship with those communities and the
quality and commitment of maintenance along the trail is an important reflection
of that relationship.
The Master Plan does not identify a single maintenance or managing entity for the
expanse of trails bikeways included within the Plan. With few, if any, exceptions,
Class II bike lanes and Class III bike routes will be the maintenance responsibility
of the Town of Truckee as the land owner (i.e., rights-of-way) of most on-street
bikeways.Class I bike paths and recreational trails will be managed and maintained
by a number of different public, private and/or non-profit entities. The intent of this
chapter is to outline the options for maintenance and management and to identify
the specific needs for the different types of recreational trails, on-street bikeways
and supporting facilities contained within the Plan. In all cases, consistent with
Management Goal 2,a responsible maintenance and management entity must be
identified and secured prior to construction of any new trail or bike path segment.
Property Management
Non-trail use needs arise such as utility installations, private driveway accesses,
and roadways that will impact the trail system. A separate set of policies and
procedures that outline the details of property management for the planned system
should be developed and implemented in order to protect the quality of the user's
experience. Key elements of this policy are summarized below:
Roadways
Each motorized vehicle crossing of the trail presents an interruption to the trail user
and a potential hazard. For this reason, approval for new crossing agreements
should be limited to those that are absolutely necessary,such as land locked parcels
with no alternative access available. Existing crossings should be formalized with
new agreements, and where possible, consolidated with other crossings. Where
anticipated automobile volumes are high,grade separation of new crossings should
be pursued.
72 Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
Encroachments
Given the public nature of the planned system, private encroachments should not
be overlooked. Resolving encroachment issues to minimize their impact on future
trails and bikeways should be a priority for all effected parties.
Utilities/Shared Usage
Compatible utility and shared usage agreements may be of benefit to both the
planned system and the requesting party. For example, underground fiber optic
cables will not interrupt use of the trail while providing an annual rental fee for
maintenance of the trail. Utilities should not be granted exclusive use of the right-of-
way but would be expected to share use with other compatible and even competing
utilities. It is strongly recommended that a utility corridor be defined and conduits
running the length of the corridor be installed as each phase of paved trail is built.
This will minimize construction and design impacts to the trail as future utilities are
installed. Under-grounding of utilities is encouraged whenever feasible.
Rules
In general, the initial set of rules proposed for the trail will stress courtesy and
cooperation with others rather than a restrictive set of edicts.The rules are outlined
below:
• Motorized vehicles prohibited except emergency and maintenance vehicles
• Keep pets on a leash and scoop up after them
• Stay to the right except when passing
• Give a clear, audible warning signal before passing
• As a courtesy to other trail users and neighbors, refrain from loitering near
adjacent homes
• Cyclists yield to pedestrians and equestrians,Pedestrians yield to equestrians.
• When entering or crossing the trail, yield to those on the trail.
• Help keep the trail clean. Pack it in, pack it out.
• Exercise caution and obey all traffic laws at all intersections
• Equestrians, please clean up after your horses
This set of rules is based upon successful projects in other areas. At this time, it
is not proposed to adopt a speed limit or a set of hours for the trail to be opened.
Trailheads, however, should be designed with the ability to close them, typically
with a sunset to sunrise closure policy.These rules should be posted conspicuously
at trailhead and other major access points along the trail. Development of a trail
brochure with a map and trail rules should be pursued.
Enforcement
The most effective and most visible enforcement on the trail will be other trail users.
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan 73
Getting as many"eyes on the trail" is a key deterrent to undesirable activity along
the trail. There are several components to accomplishing this as outlined below:
• Provide good access to the trail—Wherever feasible, public access should be
provided.Access ranges from providing conveniently located trailheads along
the trail,building sidewalk linkages at intersections,to accommodating access
from private developments adjacent to the trail.Access point should be inviting
and signed so as to welcome the public onto the trail.
• Good visibility from adjacent neighbors — Neighbors adjacent to the trail
potentially provide 24-hour surveillance of the trail and can become the public
agency's biggest ally.Though some screening of the trail is needed for privacy
of adjacent neighbors, complete blocking out of the trail from neighborhood
view should be discouraged.This eliminates the potential of neighbor's"eyes
on the trail," and could result in a"tunnel effect"on the trail.
• High level of maintenance—A well-maintained trail sends a message to the
public that the community really cares about this place.This message by itself
will discourage undesirable activity along the trail.
• Programmed events—Events along the trail will help increase public awareness
of the trail and thereby bring more people to the trail.A friends group in support
of the development of the trail has already been formed. This group can
help initiate numerous public events along the trail in an effort to raise public
awareness and increase support for the trail. Events might include a day-long
trail clean up or a series of short interpretive walks led by the friends group.
• Community projects—The support generated through the friends group could
be further capitalized on my involving neighbors and friends of the trail in a
community project along the trail.Ideas for community projects that have been
successful on other trail projects include volunteer planting events,art projects
(often associated with adjacent schools),interpretive research projects,or even
bridge-building events.These community projects are the strongest means of
creating a sense of ownership along the trail which is perhaps the strongest
single deterrent to undesirable activity along the trail,
• Local law enforcement agency staff— Local law enforcement staff must be
in tune to the trail and development plans for the trail. As each segment of
trail is developed, early involvement of law enforcement staff is critical. Trail
projects often do not follow the city grid, and law enforcement staff often have
difficulty responding to a call because no one can reference a location along
the trail, or local law enforcement staff may think the call site is in someone
else's jurisdiction.To overcome this obstacle,law enforcement staff should be
involved early in the design process and give a basic orientation of the trail.They
should be invited to join the friends group on any planned events on the site.
• Input should be sought as to the best public safety measures that can be
taken along the trail. This might include physical improvements along the
trail such as emergency call boxes and lighting, and might also include
maintenance practices such as vegetative pruning to allow easy surveillance
of"trouble spots" along the trail. Local law enforcement staff may also have
key knowledge of unique challenge areas along the trail and then addressed
74 Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
through appropriate design solutions.
• Adopt-a-Trail Program — Numerous business and residential communities
abut the trail. As neighbors to the trail, they often see the benefit of their
involvement in the trail development and maintenance. Many developments
may view the trail as an integral piece of their campus and taking on some
level of responsibility for the trail becomes a source of civic pride. Creation of
an adopt-a-trail program should be explored to capitalize on this opportunity.
Corridor Maintenance
Maintenance is as important in property management as property acquisition is
to development. It includes such activities as pavement stabilization, landscape
maintenance, facility upkeep, sign replacement, fencing, mowing, litter removal,
painting, and pest control. However, the effects of a good maintenance program
are not limited to the physical and biological features of the trail:
• A high standard of maintenance is an effective way of helping advertise and
promote the trail as a regional and state recreational resource;
• The psychological effects of good maintenance can be an effective deterrent
to vandalism, litter, and encroachments;
• Good maintenance is necessary to preserve positive public relations between
the adjacent land owners and government;
• Good maintenance can help make enforcement of regulations on the trail more
efficient. Local clubs and interest groups will take pride in "their"trail and will
be more apt to assist in protection of the trail system.
A successful maintenance program requires continuity and a high level of citizen
involvement. Regular, routine maintenance on a year-round basis will not only
improve trail safety, but will also prolong the life of the trail. Maintenance activities
required for safe trail operations should always receive top priority. The following
should be part of the maintenance checklist:
Paved Surface Maintenance
Cracks, ruts and water damage will have to be repaired periodically. In addition,
vegetation control will be necessary on a regular basis.
Where drainage problems exist along the trail, ditches and drainage structures
will need to be kept clear of debris to prevent wash outs along the trail. Checks
for erosion along the trail should be made monthly during the wet season, and
immediately after any storm that brings flooding to the local area.
The trail surface should be kept free of debris, especially broken glass and other
sharp objects, loose gravel, leaves and stray branches. Trail surfaces should be
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan 75
swept periodically.
Pest and Vegetation Management
The trail system moves through a variety of landscape setting ranging from low
scrub vegetation, meadows and dense forested areas. Some basic measures
should be taken to best protect the trail investment.This includes an annual mowing
along both sides of the trail to prevent invasion of plants into the pavement area.
Wherever possible, weed control should be accomplished by mechanical means.
This is especially true along drainage ways crossing the trail. Innovative weed
control methods such as grazing and steaming should be explored.Use of chemical
sprays should be limited to use only on those plants that are harmful to the public.
In addition, vegetation that intrudes on the equestrian trail must be controlled. A
minimum of 10' vertical clearance must be maintained.
Litter and Illegal Dumping
Litter along the Corridor should be removed by staff or volunteer effort. Litter
receptacles should be placed at access points such as trailheads. Litter should
be p cked up twice a week (usually just before and after the weekend) and after
any special events held on the trail.
Illegal dumping should be controlled by vehicle barriers, regulatory signage and
fines as much as possible. When it does occur, it must be removed as soon as
possible in order to prevent further dumping. Neighborhood volunteers, friends
groups, alternative community service crews and inmate labor should be used in
addition to maintenance staff.
Signage
Signage will be replaced along the trail on an as-needed basis. A monthly check
on the status of signage should be performed with follow-up as necessary.
Bridges
A structural engineer should be retained to assess the integrity of all existing bridges
and inspections of bridge structures should take place at regular intervals based
upon the structural engineer's recommendations.
Fencing
Use of fencing for border control(for residential security) is strongly discouraged.
The first preference will be to plant shrubs, trees and use temporary fencing to
establish privacy. As the need arises, fencing requests should be evaluated on a
case-by-case basis. Property lines should be clearly surveyed and field marked
76 Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
in a way that is useful for the maintenance staff and the trail neighbors.
Trailheads
The specialized facilities at trailheads will require frequent inspections and
maintenance. Restrooms must be cleaned on a daily basis. Site furniture and
lighting should be kept in good repair.
Maintenance/Operations Implications
Volunteer assistance should be sought to assist with maintenance of the trail
system. Though volunteer effort will most likely be ongoing, it is not intended to
be a long-term solution to trail maintenance.A trails maintenance position should
be created by the Town of Truckee and/or Truckee Donner Recreation and Park
District with primary duties to include coordination of volunteer efforts and trail
maintenance. A seasonal laborer and necessary equipment should be assigned
under this position. The maintenance personnel should be based at a central
trailhead location, providing a known staff presence.
On-going maintenance could be partially offset if adequate utility lease agreements
are arranged,or licenses or easement fees are available.Other possibilities include
"adopt-a-trail sections by adjacent businesses, business associations, residential
communities, or community service organizations.
I
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan 77
12 Funding & Financing
Opportunities
Often times,the single most difficult hurdle in the creation of a local system of trails
and bikeways is securing adequate funding. Funding sources are needed for the
acquisition,development,operation and maintenance of a trail system;therefore a
combination of creative methods and sources must be explored in order to achieve
the goals set out in the Master Plan. As stated in Development Goal 2, the Town
of Truckee is committed to identifying and diligently pursuing all available funding
and financing sources that will contribute to implementation of the Plan.
A multitude of funding possibilities is available in support of implementation of the
planned system. Funding might be obtained from grants made by federal, state or
local government,as well as from private sources.The details of the many funding
opportunities can be found in Appendix B, Exhibit 2. As a palette of options, this
matrix allows the strategic planning for funding according to the grant type and as
well as the benefit derived from each individual trail or bikeway segment.
Grant funding opportunities for individual projects providing an alternative
transportation benefit are more numerous than those available for projects design
solely for recreational use. The grant funding opportunities provided through the
federal Transportation Enhancement Act of the Twenty-First Century(TEA-21) is
the most representative example of a funding source for alternative transportation.
Although the funding availability or opportunities should not be the driving force
behind the design (i.e., surfacing, widths) of a new trail or bikeway project, this
should always be considered in the planning and design process to ensure eligibility
for the broadest range of funding opportunities.
Appendix B, Exhibit 2 provides a comprehensive approach to looking at the many
available funding opportunities. The table is organized by the following funding
streams: Federal, State, Local and Private Funding Opportunities. Each source is
then identified by the name of the sponsoring agency or organization,the specific
program name, and the funding type/typical award amounts. Additionally, each
funding opportunity listed includes a brief description of the program,who is eligible
to apply, timeframes for application, information about possible matching funds
requirements and important contact information.
The appendix is current as of the initial adoption of this Plan. As the longevity of
most grants and funding opportunities is often unpredictable, it is wise to inquire
directly to the appropriate funding entity for the most up-to-date information.
I
78 Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
Non-Profit/Foundation Opportunities
Forming a New Organization
In keeping with Management Goal 1,options related to the formation of a non-profit
501(c)3 organization or other community partnership options should be explored.
Such an entity can be more flexible and innovative than any public agency. A
private, non-profit organization has the ability to raise funds for the implementation
and maintenance of these trails and can serve as a vehicle for community support
and advocacy.
The long-term success of the system could hinge upon the formation of an
ongoing, private non-profit organization, commonly referred to as"friends" groups
or trail foundations. The single most important function of a foundation or friends
organization is to act as an advocate for the system, defending it when necessary
and promoting it the rest of the time.These independent organizations provide many
other services to trails including: physical labor such as "adopt-a-trail" clean-ups
and minor repair and construction, surveillance and reporting of any problems or
safety concerns taking place on or near the trail,fundraising to pay for structures,
amenities or threatened adjacent properties of great environmental significance,
maps, newsletters and educational information for users and the promotion of the
trail as a tourist destination for the region.
Appendix B, Exhibit 3 includes five case studies of different non-profit organizations
and/or foundations that might serve as examples for a similar group to be formed
for the purpose of spearheading the community stewardship component of the
Truckee Trails & Bikeway system according to this Plan.
Working with Existing Organizations
The Truckee-Donner Land Trust, as the region's local private land trust,could play
a significant role in acquiring, assembling and configuring parcels of land for the
dedication to the Truckee Trails & Bikeways System. There are several factors
that have contributed to the recent rise in popularity of local private land trusts as
partners to local governments interested in improving their parks and recreational
facilities. Those factors include an increasing lack of federal financial support for
local parks, an unfortunate tendency of cities to cut park budgets, and a need for
the rejuvenation of urban parks.
The Truckee Donner Land Trust could assist with a number of critical pieces of
the Plan. They have the expertise and ability to undertake the complexities of
assembling urban parkland. They could also raise money and administer financial
transactions in order to quickly expedite the land transfer process.
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan 79
Public-Private Partnerships
It has become a growing belief in recreation planning circles that the most successful
parks emerge from broad community participation. Those parks will contribute
significant value not only to the community health and spirit but also bankable
value to nearby residential and commercial districts. Successful park partnerships
have the widest range of stakeholders:the most common of which are government,
business, and non-profit foundations.
Public-private partnerships can be established for the purpose of ongoing
coordination, joint development, and the funding of a trail system. Often such
successful trail partnerships are created through a structured association of public
agencies, community groups, businesses and individuals who are dedicated to
the purpose of developing and maintaining a trail system. Through the oversight
of an administrative body such as an Advisory Council, partnerships work as
both coordinator and advocate for a project. The Advisory Council can facilitate
communication between agencies and community partners as well as assist with the
coordination of trail planning,development,and implementation of the partnerships'
goals and objectives. Partnerships with private developers are highly encouraged
and will be sought throughout the life of the Plan.
Financing Techniques
Like many other small local communities, Truckee cannot afford to immediately
dedicate all the required resources to pay for the implementation of every aspect
of the Truckee Trails & Bikeways Master Plan, It will be important to consider the
link between open space and economic development and to take advantage of
opportunities to acquire or reserve critical pieces of property as they become
available. In order to do so. there are a number of different financing options
to consider throughout this process. Appendix B, Exhibit 3 provides a list of
financing opportunities, including long-term bonds, short-term debt instruments,
and alternative financing techniques such as assessment districts and endowment
funds.
80 Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
13 Environmental Document
Program EIR —What is it?
A "first-tier" Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been prepared by the
professional firm of Alta Transportation Consultants under contract with the Town
of Truckee in support of the Master Plan consistent with the requirements of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Known as a Program EIR it relies,
in part, upon the "big picture" environmental analysis prepared in support of the
1996 Town of Truckee General Plan EIR and the 1997 Town of Truckee Downtown
Specific Plan EIR.
A Program EIR(in lieu of other types of EIR's)has been prepared to avoid redundant
analysis and to reduce costs while at the same time achieving a high level of
environmental review and protection. The EIR is designed to "pre-mitigate" many
of the potential impacts associated with implementation of the planned system.
The EIR is contained within a separate bound volume available from the Town of
Truckee Community Development Department.
Relationship to Future Projects/Environmental Review
The Program EIR is designed to be both comprehensive and specific.The document
concentrates on the potential cumulative long-term impacts associated with
implementation of the Master Plan, but also contains adequate detail to anticipate
and analyze the many subsequent activities within the scope of the Master Plan.
The Program EIR is intended to provide adequate detail and analysis to satisfy the
CEQA review requirements for most subsequent projects contained within the scope
of the Master Plan.All projects implementing the Master Plan (i.e., development of
a specific trail segment)will be analyzed to determine whether the project impacts
have been fully and adequately analyzed within the Program EIR. If the impacts of
a specific project will have no impact beyond those analyzed within the Program
EIR as documented within the project environmental initial study, no further CEQA
compliance will be necessary.
Some projects implementing the Master Plan will require additional environmental
review to satisfy the requirements of CEQA. These projects typically involve
disturbance within flood-plains, areas of archaeological/cultural importance, or
wetland areas and warrant a more detailed environmental review. Projects involving
potential impacts beyond that analyzed in the Program EIR will be subject to the
appropriate "second-tier" EIR or Negative Declaration process as appropriate,
dependent upon the extent, type or potential for an impact(s) to the environment
consistent with the requirements of CEQA. In either case, the environmental
document will focus on the issue or issues found to have a potential impact
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan 81
upon the environment and include methods to mitigate this impact(s)to less than
significant levels.
In all cases, public notice of a proposed CEQA determination by the lead agency
will be provided to the community.This notification will most commonly accompany
the necessary public notice for the recreational trail proposal and evaluation process
described in Chapter 8, Trail Design & Development.
EIR Scope
The EIR prepared for the Master Plan contains all of the necessary components
required of a Program EIR, following the standard organizational format
recommended by the CEQA Guidelines.The Plan includes an analysis of the range
of potential environmental impacts of the Plan, as well as proposed alternatives
to the proposed Plan. Specifically, the following potential environmental impacts
associated with implementation of the Plan have been analyzed:
• Land Use
• Transportation/Circulation
• Biological Resources
• Cultural Resources
• Geology&Soils
• Safety&Security
• Public Facilities&Services
• Visual Quality
• Air Quality
• Hydrology&Water Quality
• Noise
Summary of Conclusions
The EIR evaluated all potential environmental impacts that could result from
implementation of the Plan, and where an impact is determined to be significant
or potentially significant, mitigation measures are identified to address these
impacts. The EIR includes seventy mitigation measures for the various potential
impacts identified within the environmental analysis,either identified within the EIR
analysis or within the Master Plan. Implementation of the Plan will have varying
degrees of impact upon the environment;however,none of the impacts have been
determined to be significant or cumulatively significant with the incorporation of
these mitigation measures into the Plan and future project proposals. Chapter 2,
Executive Summary,of the EIR provides a summary of the Master Plan's significant
impacts, mitigation measures and the level of significance after incorporation of
these mitigation measures.
82 Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
The EIR also concludes that the Plan does not create a growth-inducing impact.
The Master Plan provides for a network of interconnected recreational trails and
on-street bikeways designed to link existing developed areas of the Town or areas
planned for future development under the General Plan.The Plan does not result
in any new housing or the expansion of major roadways or utility infrastructure into
undeveloped areas of Town.
Three alternatives to the proposed Plan were evaluated within the EIR: a 'no
project' alternative, an 'existing trail' alternative and an 'on-street' alternative.The
'on-street' alternative is the environmentally superior alternative, resulting in the
greatest reduction of impacts due to the scope of new trail and bikeway projects
being limited to existing roadways. This alternative would however, significantly
reduce and limit the size and effectiveness of the planned system and compromise
the most fundamental objectives of the Plan.A complete discussion of the project
alternatives evaluated within the EIR is contained within Chapter 5, Alternatives,
of the EIR.
I
I
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan 83
Appendices
Appendix A- List of Figures and Tables
Appendix B
Exhibit 1 -Recreational Trail Segments
Exhibit 2-Funding Sources
Exhibit 3 - Financing Techniques
Exhibit 4-Case Studies
Appendix C- References
Appendix D
Exhibit 1 - Local Map
Exhibit 2- Bikeway Map
I
I
84 Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
Appendix A
List of Figures and Tables
II
1
I
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan Appendix A
Appendix A
List of Figures &Tables
Chapter 1 - Introduction& Summary Chapter 8-Design Guidelines(continued)
Figures 8.16-Infiltration
1.1 -Committee Advertisement 8.17-Gabion
1.2-Community Workshop Promotion 8.18-Trail Adjacent to Environmentally Sensitive Area
1.3-Town Council Resolution 2001-80 8.19-Major Crossing of Stream or Drainage
8.20-Bridge 8.21 -Boardwalk
8.22-Culverts
Chapter 3-Relationship with GP&DSP 8.23-Log Water Bar
8.24-Fences 8.25-Bicycle Racks
Figures 8.26-Informational Signage
3.1 -General Plan Vision Statement 8.27-Information Kiosk
8.28-Interpretive Sign
8.29-Trailhead with Parking
Chapter 5-On-Street Bikeways 8.30-Trailhead with Small Parking Area
8.31 -Trailhead with Major Parking Area
Figures
5.1 -Class II Bike Lane Tables
5.2-Class Ill Bike Route 8.1 -Class I Bicycle Path Specifications
8.2-Class II Bike Lane Specifications
8.3-Class III Bike Route Specifications
Chapter 6-Recreational Trails 8.4-Recommended Signing&Marking
8.5-Trail Characteristics by Level of Challenge
Figures 8.6-Trail Levels&Recommendations
6.1 -Class I Bike Path 8.7-Rolling Dip 1 Water Bar Spacing in Different Materials
6.2-Soft Surface Recreational Trail 8.8-Recommended Distance Between Culvert Cross-drains
6.3-Class I Bike Path with Recreational Trail 8.9-ADA Trail Development Guidelines
6.4-Alignment Planning
6.5-Corridor Planning
Chapter 8-Design Guidelines
Figures
8.1 - Class I, II & Ill Bikeway Classifications
8.2 - Class I Bike Path
8.3 - Shared Class I Bike Path
8.4 - At-Grade Crossing
8.5 - Regulatory&Safety Bikeway Signs
8.6 - Class II Bike Lane with Narrow Travel Lane
8.7 - Trail Adjacent to Street
8.8 - Trail Parallel to Roadway
8.9 - Trail in Relation to Street, Residence&Stream
8.10-Trail Adjacent to Development
8.11 -Trail Concept Through Clustered Subdivision
8.12-Trail Adjacent to Railroad
8.13-Creek Trail on Slope
8.14-Trail Side-Slope Treatments
8.15-Tread Construction, Stabilization &Steps
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
Appendix A
Appendix B
Exhibit 1 - Recreational Trail Segment Descriptions
Appendix 6,Exhibit 1 Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
Appendix B
Exhibit 1 - Recreational Trail Segment Desriptions
Segment Primary Use(rec, Intended Connection Segment Description Opportunities/Constraints
Number alt.trans or both)
1 Recreation Donner Lake to Donner From west end of Donner Lake off Old • Utilizes Emigrant Trail easement(existing or to
Summit Highway Drive bike route to Donner be created upon future subdivision of land)
Summit. • Trailhead opportunity
Connects to:Old Highway • Possible alternate and/or additional route
Drive bike route.Regional Also connects with Pacific Crest Trail and via Old Highway 37 from Washoe Road
link. Donner Lake Rim Trail. ascending to railroad tracks
• Steep
Alternative transportation route provided • Private Property
via Old Highway 40 bike lane.
2 Recreation Donner Lake to Donner Starts from Donner Lake Road bike route • Scenic corridor along Gregory Creek
Lake Rim Trail at Donner Lake and follows Gregory Creek • Existing 1-80 under crossing
corridor and portions of Donner Lake Road • Excellent staging area potential at Negro
Connects to:Donner Lake to Negro Canyon. Canyon for access to Donner Lake Rim Trail
Road bike lane&Donner and beyond
Pass Road bike lane. Also connects with Donner Lake Rim Trail • Development potential along Gregory Creek
Regional link. to the north. and within Negro Canyon
• Creek corridor narrow and steep in places
Alternative transportation route provided • Northerly access to Donner Lake Road bike
via Donner Lake Road bike route. route is constrained—narrow and steep
3 Recreation Tahoe Donner to the North Extension of Tahoe Donner trail system • Possible existing trail/roads
through TOHOA lands.Provides access to • Steep terrain
Connects to:Tahoe Donner regional resources-Prosser Hill and OHV • Private Property
trail system.Regional link. staging area.
4 Recreation Tahoe Donner to From south side of Alder Creek Road • Utilizes existing trail north of Alder Creek
Commemorative Emigrant @ trail signage utilizing the existing campground connecting with Tahoe Donner
Trail Commemorative Emigrant Trail,continues cross country center
west to end of USFS maintained trail. • Possible access to Prosser Hill via US Forest
Connects to:15,16&Alder Crosses to north side of Alder Creek Road Service Road#780-12
Creek Road bike lane. at Road#780-12,continuing west to Tahoe • USFS lands
Regional link. Donner campground. • Mostly existing trail
• Provides frequent connection with Alder
Also provides regional link north using Creek Road bike lane
small portion of existing Tahoe Donner trail • Great staging area in summer and for cross
system. country skiing if improved and maintained
• Intersection at trail crossing at Alder Creek
Alternative transportation route provided and US Forest Service Road#780-12
via Alder Creek Road bike lane. dangerous
5 Recreation East end of Donner Lake to Provides in-town connection with Donner • Portion utilizes USFS and TDPUD lands
Donner Summit Summit via Donner Lake Rim Trail,Donner • Alignment to be planned as part of Donner
Pass Road bike lane and Sierra Drive bike Lake Rim Trail implementation
Connects to:8&Sierra route. • Private lands.Potential private property
Drive bike route.Regional objections from Skislope Road and Armstrong
link. Alternative transportation route provided Tract homeowners
via Donner Pass Road bike lane. • Steep in portions
6 Recreation Donner Memorial State Connects extension of South Shore • Public land
Park to Coldstream Road Drive bike route through State Park to • Scenic Donner Creek
Coldstream Road. Utilizes unimproved trail • Existing trail
Connects to:9&South along state park fence line. • Environmental resources
Shore Drive extension bike
route in State Park.
7 Recreation PC-1 to Deerfield Drive Follows Cold Creek through PC-1,providing • Cold Creek bench on east side of creek could
access to Coldstream Valley. provide natural alignment
Connects to:9&Deerfield • PC-1 implementation potential(GP PC-1
Drive bike route. Policy 8&9)
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan E-1
Appendix B
8 Recreation Armstrong Tract/Donner From corner of Palisade Street 1 Thomas • Use of existing logging road potential
Lake to Tahoe Donner Drive bike route,travels northeasterly • USFS/TDPUD lands
utilizing existing logging roads to • Possible future development adjoining
Connects to.5,13, Northwoods Boulevard @ power lines and Armstrong Tract
Northwoods Blvd.bike lane potential trailhead location. Possible use of powerline corridors visible
&Thomas Drive bike route. from Northwoods Boulevard
Alternative transportation route provided • Trailhead potential on Northwoods Boulevard
via Donner Pass Road and Northwoods just outside of Tahoe Donner boundary
Boulevard bike lanes. • Ties into Tahoe Donner 3rd access road
• 3rd access road development may provide
nearby trailhead opportunity
• Private property
• Steep
• Northwoods Boufevard crossing difficulty
9 Recreation Coldstream Road/Donner Important Donner Lake-Downtown • Trailhead connections proposed at west
Memorial State Park to recreation connection from Coldstream end at Cold Stream Road and at east end at
Highway 89 South Road @I-80 to Deerfield Drive @ Highway Highway 89 South
89 South. Utilizes existing rough graded • PC-1 implementation potential(GP PC-1
Connects to:6,7,14, roads,a portion paralleling railroad tracks. Policy 8&9)
Deerfield Drive bike route • Utilizes existing dirt roads
&Hwy 89 South bike lane. Provides regional link to Coldstream Valley, • Proximity to railroad tracks at southernmost
Regional link. Donner Lake Rim Trail and beyond. end
• Potential conflict with Deerfield Drive
Alternative transportation route provided residential area
via Deerfield Drive bike route or Donner
Pass Road bike lane.
10 Recreation Gateway to Tahoe Donner From Gateway switchbacks north past • Use of existing masonry bridge over Trout
Truckee Falls Golf Course and Tahoe Creek
Connects to: 13(Tahoe Donner 3rd access to Euer Valley Road.
• Existing logging roads
Donner 3rd access)& On north side of Luasanne Way,connects • Possible Donner Pass Road commercial
Donner Pass Road bike along existing trail on west side of Trout development and Truckee Falls Golf Course
lane Creek through Tahoe Donner to clubhouse. residential development
• Bennett Flat meadow very wet
Alternative transportation route provided • Private property
via Donner Pass Road bike lane to • Many private landowners along Euer Valley
Northwoods Boulevard bike lane. Road
• Travels along backside of properties in Tahoe
Donner
• Steep
11 Recreation Tahoe Donner to Utilizes existing dirt logging roads/path • Can utilize existing logging roads/dirt paths
Downtown from Basel Place access point following • Heavily used paths that connect to downtown
drainage into Downtown @ Bridge Street. • Portion utilizes Tahoe Donner owned land
Connects to:12,13,20 Connects with Segment 12(northerly • Scenic drainage
&Lausanne Way/Basel link),Segment 13(east-west link,Tahoe • Private property
Place bike routes Donner 3rd access),and Segment 20 • Possible bridge construction over drainage
(east-west link,paralleling 1-80)
12 Recreation East end of Tahoe Donner Provides north-south link from east • Provides primary north-south connection on
to Commemorative side of Tahoe Donner to recreation and east end of Tahoe Donner
Emigrant Trail alternative transportation opportunities • Use of existing old logging roads,informal
north. trails and dedicated easements
Connects to:4,11 &16 • Possible use of Tahoe Donner owned lands
along eastern subdivision boundary
• USFS lands
• Connects to Alder Hill and Prosser area
• Private lands
13 Both Downtown to Tahoe In conjunction with Tahoe Donner 3rd • Travels through Euer Valley
Donner access,connects Historic Downtown @ Develop in conjunction with 3rd Tahoe
Bridge Street with Tahoe Donner. Also Donner access
Connects to 8.10,11,20, connects with Segment 21 linking Tahoe • Possible separated recreation path adjacent
21 &27 Donner 3rd access with Alder Drive and to scenic Trout Creek
potential school site.
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
Appendix B
14 Recreation Highway 89 South to Important Highway 89 South-Downtown • Trailhead proposed at Highway 89 South and
Downtown connection. From trailhead at Highway 89 Deerfield Drive
South @ Deerfield,follows Donner Creek • Hippie Hill spur connection potential
Connects to:9,18, to Truckee River on south side of West • Possible opportunity to develop trail when
Southwest River Street River Street. Continues along Truckee mouse hole widened
bike lane,West River River on south side of river through Fish • Possible use of Donner Creek culvert under
Street bike lane,&Hiwy and Game property to downtown @ railroad tracks,although flooding conflicts
89 South bike lane. Southwest River Street • Existing Truckee River bridge abutments can
Regional link. possibly be used for crossing
Also includes spur connection to possible • Railroad track crossing may be obstacle
Truckee River Trail paralleling Highway 89 • Existing Highway 89 South mouse hole
South and connecting to Tahoe City bike and Donner Creek under railroad tracks
path,potentially utilizing planned USFS constraints
Sawtooth Ridge Trail,
15 Recreation Prosser Lakeview Estates Continuation of Commemorative Emigrant • Use of existing bench
to Commemorative Trail @ Alder Creek Road to Highway 89 • Scenic Alder Creek
Emigrant Trail North. Utilizes existing bench between • Private property
Alder Creek Road and Alder Creek to Right-of-way constrained at Alder Creek
Connects to: 4.22,Alder Highway 89 North. Provides connection Road/Alder Drive intersection
Creek Road bike lane& with primary north-south corridor • Environmental resources
Hwy 89 North bike lane (Segment 22)paralleling Highway 89 • Connection and topography at Highway 89
North. North/Alder Creek Road curve difficult
16 Both Prosser Lake Heights/ Connection between north-south • North abutting USFS lands and logging roads
PC-2 to Tahoe Donner/ Segment 12 on west side to Beacon • Tahoe Donner North access to middle school
Commemorative Emigrant Road extension on east side. Provides • Key east-west connection
Trail important east-west connection.possibly • Private property
utilizing existing logging roads and
Connects to:12&Beacon dedicated easements.
Road extension bike route
Also includes spur connection with the
east end of Brookstone Road utilizing
existing rough graded road and right-of-
way.
17 Recreation Truckee River Regional From proposed trailhead at Truckee River • Key connection between Downtown/
Park/Ponderosa Palisades Regional Park,travels south and west Truckee River and southerly public lands and
to Sawtooth Ridge Trail over Highway 267 through Hilltop. Could recreational opportunities
utilize Thelin Road right-of-way into Placer • Public land and Thelin Drive public right-of-
Connects to:18, 19,33 County,providing link to USFS 06 Road way
&Hiwy 267 bike lane. and planned Sawtooth Ridge Trail. • Utilizes portion of Great Race Trail
Regional link. • Private land
• Topographic constraints
18 Both Ponderosa Palisades/ Travels from Ponderosa Palisades • Provides good connection between
Hilltop to Sierra Meadows/ at Palisades Drive/Ponderosa Road Ponderosa Palisades and Donner Lake and
Truckee River Trail intersection west toward Truckee River. planned Truckee River Park
Connects with Truckee River Trail • Can utilize existing trail and likely(need
Connects to:14, 17& (Segment 14)@ Fish and Game owned verification)public right-of-way of Palisades
Palisades Drive bike lane. property adjacent to river. Drive and Thelin Drive
• Scenic Truckee River and historic Hilltop
• Very steep
• Private property
• Residential conflict potential
19 Recreation Downtown to Hilltop Short spur connecting Historic Downtown • Existing very rough trail adjacent to Highway
to Hilltop area. 267
Connects to:17&Hiwy • Steep in places
267 bike lane
20 Recreation Gateway to PC-2 From Gateway area at historic McIver • Existing dirt path on Gateway East
Dairy site parallels 1-80 to USFS station @ development parcel and continuing east
Connects to:11, 13.22& Highway 89 North. Gateway-Highway 89 • Connects with trailhead location @ Bridge
Donner Pass Road/Hiwy North connection around downtown. Street
89 North bike lanes • Private property
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan 6-3
Appendix B
21 Both Downtown/Tahoe Donner Spur connection from Tahoe Dormer • Implementation as part of Tahoe Donner 3rd
to PC-2 3rd access(Segment 13)north to PC-2 access and/or PC-2
school site,Alder Drive,and continuing to • Could follow scenic drainage
Connects to 13,27& Prosser area via Segment 27. • Private properly
Alder Drive bike lane/route Drainage crossing
22 Alternative Downtown to PC-2\ Parallels Highway 89 North on the west • Trailhead potential at Alder Drive/PC-2
Transportation Prosser subdivisions side and proposed Class II bike lane on intersection in conjunction with school
highway. Follows an existing dirt path • Connections to planned downtown trails
Connects to:15,20,21. from USFS to Alder Drive. • Private property
23,24,27,Alder Drive • Steep at north end of Alder Creek Road
bike lane,Alder Creek intersection
bike lane,and Highway 89
North bike lane.
23 Recreation Prosser Lake Heights to Begins @ end of Beacon Road within • Utilizes existing Beacon Road extension
PC-2 existing right-of-way,utilizing existing dirt right-of-way dedication
footpath. • Existing rough foot path
Connects to: • Centralized east-west access for PC-2
22 and Alder Drive bike • Possible PC-2 implementation
route • Abutting residential uses
24 Recreation Prosser Lake Heights! Begins @ end of Alder Drive utilizing • Existing easement potential
Sugar Pine Estates to existing rough graded road and correlating • Existing rough grade logging road potential
PC2 utility easement. • Possible PC-2 implementation
• Abutting residential uses
Connects to:22&Alder "*this segment changed—needs
Drive bike route modification***
25 Both Prosser Lakeview Estates Connects Prosser Lakeview Estates @ • Existing informal trails in area
to proposed Middle Rainbow Drive with Highway 89 North • Access on east side provides neighborhood
School @ Alder Drive via Segment 27.Provides access to school
access to proposed middle school site • Possible PC-2 implementation
Connects to 26& 27 traveling on the east side of Highway 89
North.
26 Recreation Prosser Lakeview Estates East-west connector from Highway 89 • Existing utility corridor south of Prosser
at Highway 89 North to North to Segment 27 providing access Lakeview Estates
Alder Drive to northerly public lands and recreational • Possible residential use conflict
opportunities.
Connects to:24,25,27,2,
Hwy 89 North bike lane&
Rainbow Drive bike route
27 Recreation PC-2 to Prosser Lakeview From Highway 89 North at Alder Drive/ • Historic railroad right-of-way and bridge
Estates/Prosser Reservoir Prosser Damn Road intersection north to @ west side of Prosser Reservoir @ Alder
USFS lands/Prosser Reservoir. Creek drainage
Connects to:21,22,25, • Public land connecting to Commemorative
26,29,Hwy 89 North bike Also includes spur connection east to Emigrant Trail
lane&Prosser Lakeview Prosser Dam Road bike lane around • Existing roads
Estates bike route. southeast side of Prosser Reservoir. • Private property
Regional link. • Possible wetlands/riparian corridor
28 Alternative Olympic Heights to From Olympic Heights @ end of Olympic • USFS lands
Transportation Downtown Boulevard to Highway 89 North and • Existing informal trails
Downtown @ cemetery. • Utilize historic trail alignment
Connects to:29.Hwy 89 • Heavily used trails and utility road
North bike lane&Olympic • Highway 267 bypass major obstacle to trail
Boulevard bike route. alignment
Regional link.
29 Both Olympic Heights/Truckee North-south connection between Olympic • Possible river crossing utilizing sewer line
River to Prosser Area Heights and Truckee River to Pannonia bridge @ East River Street
Ranchos,Prosser Lakeview Estates and • Possibly implementation with development of
Connects to:26,27,28. Reservoir. Utilizes Fiberboard Old Mill Site
30,31,33&Prosser Dam under crossing • Possible use of large Trout Creek culvert if
Road bike lane redesigned
• Private property
• Three difficult crossings on southernmost
end:railroad tracks,Truckee River,Glenshire
Drive
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
Appendix B
30 Alternative Pannonia Ranchos to Follows existing rough graded wide road • Potential dedication as part of development
Transportation Downtown Utilizes Fiberboard under crossing from • Flat
Pannonia Ranchos and Prosser Village • Additional possible spur connection with
Connects to:29,31,35 Interchange in route to Downtown. Also Mount Rose View extension @ Pannonia
&36 connects Prosser Village Interchange with Ranchos
Fibreboard under crossing.
31 Alternative Two north-south corridors An east-west connector trail following a • Dedication possible with development
Transportation rough graded road linking two primary potential of site
Connects to'.29&32 north-south corridors—Segment 29 and
Segment 32.
32 Both Olympic Heights to From Olympic heights @ Olympic • Uses existing rough road
Pannonia Ranchos/ Boulevard to Pannonia Ranchos via • Dedication possible with development
Prosser Area Prosser Village interchange and on to potential of site
Prosser Reservoir via Segment 33 • Private Property
Connects to:30,31,35. • Wildlife migration corridor conflict potential
36&Olympic Blvd.bike
route
33 Recreation Downtown to Our Truckee River Legacy Trail. Existing parking east side of new bridge
Glenshire Follows Truckee River on south side Connections to Truckee River Regional Park and
from Downtown to Glenshire. planned Joerger Drive ballfields
Connects to:18,29, Utility right-of-way
34,39,Glenshire Drive Options include using existing utility Steep eroding slope
bike lane&Hwy 267 right of way traveling along existing
bike lane. cut or following the river to proposed
trailhead at new bridge.River side
access would require two river
crossings at bridges due to steep
slopes.
34 Recreation Truckee River Regional Connects with westernmost portion Connects to campground and Dam
Park to Martis Valley of Legacy Trail,providing continued Public lands
access to planned Joerger bail Flat
Connects to:33. fields and Martis Valley recreational
Regional link. opportunities.
35 Both Glenshire to Prosser From informal sled hill at Glenshire Flat
Area Bridge crosses Airport Flats area, Existing right-of-way potential
utilizing Prosser Village Interchange Private property
Connects to:30,31, to make east-west connection with
32.38&Glenshire resources and residential areas
Drive bike lane. beyond.
36 Recreation Prosser to Prosser Prosser Village Interchange @ 1-80 to Existing USFS informal roads and trails along
Reservoir Prosser Reservoir following Station scenic Station Creek
Creek. Public lands
Connects to:30,31,35 Wetlands potential
&37. Regional link. Steep northerly link
Private lands
Potential motorized conflict from Prosser Pits
OHV Area
37 Recreation Glenshire to Prosser From Prosser Pits OHV Area,utilizes Public lands
Reservoir dirt road @ old dam,then travels Existing rough trail on south side of Prosser
along Prosser Creek on the north side Creek
Connects to:36&38. following an existing trail to railroad Necessary out-of-town connection
Regional link. tracks @ intersection with Segment 38. Possible environmental constraints
Potential railroad conflict
38 Recreation Glenshire to Boca Connects Glenshire Drive at Glenshire • Historic site potential—railroad related
Reservoir Bridge north to Prosser Creek(Segment • Use of railroad right-of-way on the south end
37). Follows railroad tracks and river of the trail segment may pose conflict
Connects to:35,37& along the north side to Boca Reservoir • River has tight curve;constrained access;
Glenshire Drive bike lane. and Historic Townsite trail steep bank
Regional link. • Private lands
• Need to cross under 180-limited
opportunities
• Steep
-
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
Appendix 8
39 Recreation Truckee River Trail to Follows Martis Creek south from Truckee • Significant recreational opportunity at Martis
Martis Valley River Trail to Martis Valley Creek Lake
• May be constraints due to Teichert operations
Connects to:33. Regional and creek
link.
40 Recreation Glenshire to Truckee Recreational link providing Truckee River • Glenshire HOA lands
River access from Glenshire subdivision from • Scenic drainage
Dorchester Drive. • Steep canyon
Connects to:41 & • Private lands
Dorchester Drive bike lane
41 Both Glenshire to Truckee Recreational and alternative • Development potential
River transportation link providing Truckee River • Could utilize existing graded roads
access from Glenshire subdivision from • Private property(Sha Neva and FlyCasters)
Connects to:Glenshire Archery View. • Existing Sha Neva operations
Drive bike lane
42 Recreation Glenshire to Tahoe Boca Follows drainage and existing dirt roads • Staging area opportunity
Estates through Glenshire from store along creek • Primary access from Glenshire to public
to Tahoe Boca Estates. lands to the east
Connects to:Glenshire • Drainage and meadow constraints
Drive bike lane.Regional
link.
43 Both Downtown to Martis Valley Parallels State Highway 267(Brockway • Dense existing and new development
Road),connecting both existing and future potential length of corridor
Connects to: 19,33& development • Wide public right-of-way
State Highway 267 bike • Existing commercial development and
lane.Regional link. improvements on north side of corridor
• State Highway 267 bypass constraint
B-6 Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
Appendix B
Appendix B
Exhibit 2 - Funding Sources
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan Appendix B,Exhibit 2
Appendix B
Exhibit 2- Funding Source
Sponsoring Program Funding Type& Brief Description Eligible Deadlines or Matching Funds Contact Information Miscellaneous Notes Additional
Organization Name Award Amount Applicants Cycles Information
FEDERAL FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES
U.S. Transportation This program TEA-21 provides funding Cities, The schedule 20%matching Dan Landon Initiated projects must gain support
Department of Equity Act has several for roads,transit,safety and counties,transit on TEA-21 share required. Nevada County of local government. Local
Transportation for the 21st different environmental enhancements. operators, projects Transportation government submits projects to the
Century(TEA- funding General state and local Special districts changes Commission County Transportation Commission
21) opportunities. improvements for highways may apply with annually. 101 Providence Mine for review and prioritization
This program and bridges that accommodate sponsorship Check Road,Suite 102 for inclusion in the Regional
will end in additional modes of transit are from an eligible with local Nevada City,CA 95959 Transportation Improvement Plan.
2003,to be included. Also applicable are applicant. transportation Tel:(530)265-3202 Allocations are then made on the
replaced by a capital costs,publidy owned commission Fax:(530)265-3260 basis of priorities developed by the
new program. intercity facilities,and bicycle and for current http:/iwww.nctc.ca.gov Regional Transportation Plan and
(Estimated at pedestrian facilities. schedules. local funding policies
approx.$215
billion over the
next 6 years).
U.S. Surface ~Grant. The Surface Transportation Cities,counties, Based on a A local match Dan Landon Sidewalk improvements to comply
Department of Transportation Approximately Program(STP)is a block grant other local multi-year of 20%required Nevada County with the Americans with Disabilities
Transportation Program Fund $535 million fund that provides flexible governments, project for bicycle and Transportation Act(ADA)are now eligible for STP
(Section 1108) available funding that may be used for transit selection pedestrian Commission101 funds.TEA-21 allows the transfer of
annually roads,bridges,transit capital and operators, process,dates projects, 11.5% Providence Mine funds from other TEA-21 programs
nationwide. pedestrian and bicycle projects Caltrans,federal are pending. is required for RoadSuite 102 to the STP Fund.
including bicycle transportation agencies. all other types of Nevada City,California
facilities,bike parking facilities, Non-profit projects. 95959
equipment for transporting organizations Tel:(530)265-3202
bicycles on mass transit and special Fax:(530)265-3260
facilities,bike activated traffic districts may http://www.nctc.ca.gov
control devices,preservation of also apply with
abandoned railway corridors for sponsorship
bicycle and pedestrian trails,and from an eligible
improvements for highways and agency.
bridges.
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan I''
Appendi111111
MI
U.S. Transportation Grant. This program provides State and local Annual grant No required Federal Highway This pilot program provides
Department of and Discretionary discretionary grants to plan governments process, Initial match Administration funding for a comprehensive
Transportation Community funding,varies and implement strategies and agencies; Letter of Intent California Division initiative including planning
and System annually-$25M which improve the efficiency metropolitan due in May Office grants,implementation grants,
Preservation authorized of the transportation system, planning and Final grant 980 9th Street,Suite and research to investigate and
Pilot Program for nationally reduce environmental impacts organizations proposals due 400 address the relationship between
competitive of transportation,reduce the in August Sacramento,CA transportation and community and
program. need for costly future public 95814-2724 system preservation and to identify
infrastructure investments, Tel:916-498-5034 private sector-based initiatives.
ensure efficient access to jobs,
services and centers of trade,
and examine development
patterns and identify strategies
to encourage private sector
development patterns which
achieve these goals.
U.S. Federal Lands Grant. This discretionary program Local The application No required Caltrans Facilities funded through this
Department of Highway Approximately provides funding for any kind of governments, deadline is July. match Division of State program must be located
Transportation Program $150 million transportation project(including Caltrans, and Local Project and designed pursuant to an
available pedestrian and bicycle facilities) Bureau of Land Development overall plan developed by each
annually that are within,provide access Management Office of Local Metropolitan Planning Organization
and rising to to or are adjacent to Federal and (BLM)and Programs and incorporated into the Regional
$165 million Indian lands. the National P.O.Box 942874 Transportation Improvement Plan.
nationwide Trail System Sacramento,CA
Program 94274-0001
Tel 916-653-8220
Contact:Mel Aros
U S. National Grants. NHS funds are to provide for State and local Applications 20%local or Dan Landon Facilities funded through this
Department of Highway Approximately an interconnected system of governments are accepted state match is Nevada County program must be located
Transportation System Fund $441 M annually principal arterial routes. The and agencies; year round, required. Transportation and designed pursuant to an
nationwide. program's goal is to provide metropolitan deadlines are Commission overall plan developed by each
access to major population planning pending. 101 Providence Mine Metropolitan Planning Organization
centers,international border organizations Road,Suite 102 and incorporated into the Regional
crossings,transportation Nevada City,CA 95959 Transportation Improvement Plan.
systems,meet national defense Tel:(530)265-3202
requirements and serve interstate Fax:(530)265-3260
and interregional travel,which http://www.nctc.ca.gov
includes access for bicyclists and
pedestrians.
!;-6 Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
Appendix B
U.S Highway Grants Provides funding for research on Cities,counties 25%local match Federal Highway
Department of Safety, all phases of highway safety and and state required. Administration
Transportation Research,and traffic conditions. Uses training agencies. California Division
Development and education of highway safety Programs are Office
Fund personnel,research fellowships often run by 980 9th Street
in highway safety,development of local community Suite 400
improved accident investigation traffic safely Sacramento,CA
procedures,emergency service programs. 95814-2724
plan,and demonstration projects. Tel:916-498-5034
Projects include improving
pedestrian safety through
education,police enforcement,
and traffic engineering.
U.S. Environmental Grant. Two Administered by US EPA Local,tribal,or Information 25%matching Stacey Benfer
Environmental Education levels of Region 9,this grant is ideal for state education is published share required. US EPA-Region
Protection Grants funding: funding interpretive elements practices, in August, 975 Hawthorne Street
Agency 1.$5K or less for your trail. The grants methods,or applications San Francisco,CA
2.$5K- provide support for projects techniques. due by 94105
$25KTotal which design,demonstrate November Tel: 415-744-1161
funding in FY00 or disseminate environmental for projects Fax: 415-744-1072
was$160K; education practices,methods,or beginning the benfer.stacey@
approx. 15 techniques. next Spring epamail.epa
projects funded
each year.
U S.Forest Schools and Grant. Formula Funds are used for public roads Cities and Application No match Public Affairs Office
Service Roads Grants grants are 25% and schools that are located in counties deadline is required. U.S.Forest Service
to States of the receipts the same county as a National containing annually in the 630 Sansome Street
collected from Forest. The program's intention National Forest Spring. San Francisco,CA
timber and land is to maintain county roads which Land. 94111
use fees to lead to Forest Service roads. Tel: 415-705-2703
the respective Contact:Denise Mills-
counties. Fifty Ford
percent of
these funds are
used for roads.
CALIFORNIA(CA)STATE FUNDING
OPPORTUNITIES
Truckee Tr it Bikeways Master Plan
Append ME
California Bicycle Grant. The purpose of the BTA is Cities and Applications 10%local
Department of Transport- Currently to improve the safety and Counties with due October- match required.
Transportation ation Account funded at$1.5 convenience of bicycling for approved December. Applications
(Caltrans) (Caltrans million per year; utilitarian reasons. Eligible bicycle plans. due October-
Bicycle will rise to$5 projects include new bike paths, December.
Facilities Unit) million by 2004. bike lanes,and bike routes
No agency that serve major transportation
shall receive corridors and that remove
more than 25% travel barriers,bicycle parking
of total funds. facilities,bike racks on buses,
For FY00/01, traffic control devises to improve
a local agency safety,planning,education
may receive up and maintenance of bikeways.
to$375K. Priority projects serve bicycle
commuters,have activity centers
at each end point,are consistent
with the bicycle plan/program and
close to missing links.
(Caltrans) Transport- Reimburseable Nevada County's Regional share Agencies Marsha B.Mason,
ation federal funds is estimated at$164K for FY01 with a Local Chief,Transportation
Enhancement (not a grants -See Nevada County below. Agency-State Enhancement Activities
Activities program) Transportation enhancement Agreement Branch
activities must have a direct (master California Department
relationship-by function, agreement)and of Transportation
proximity or impact-to the determined to 1120 N Street,M.S.28
intermodal transportation system. be capable by Sacramento,CA
the Caltrans 95814
District Local Tel: 916-654-5275
Assistance Fax: 916-654-3770
Engineer may
administer
projects.Up
to 88%of the
actual eligible
expenditures
can be
reimbursed.
6-10 Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
Appendix B
California National Grants. This program provides funding Local A call for 20%local match Caltrans Division of The local jurisdiction and the
Department of Scenic Byways Approximately for the planning,design,and government projects is sent is required. Planning metropolitan planning organization
Transportation Program $10M annually development of a State Scenic agencies. out in February, Box 942873 must formally support the byway.
(Caltrans) statewide Byways Program. Priority is deadline dates Sacramento,CA The local agencies must contact
given to designated scenic are pending. 95814 Caltrans district office local
byways,proposals with specific Tel: 914-324-6514 representatives,delineate a
intent and projects established Contact: Donna Long corridor,hold public hearings and
under partnerships. Funds may adopt a scenic highway element in
be used for the construction of their zoning ordinances. Caltrans
facilities along the highway for the reviews the proposal. If it is
use of pedestrians and bicyclists, approved,the Federal Highway
including pedestrian/bicycle Administration allocates the funds.
access,safety improvements and
rest areas.
California Safe Routes to Grant.New Safe Routes to School program City or counties September 90%federal Randy Ronning at This is a construction bill.Costs
Department of School grant with will use federal transportation reimbursable randy_ronning @dot for programs or activities related
Transportation $20M total per funds for construction of bicycle funds. Applicants ca.gov or at(916) to"education",'enforcement'or
(Caltrans) year and pedestrian safety and traffic must fund the 653-4727 'encouragement are not eligible for
calming projects. remaining 10%. reimbursement unless those costs
are incidental to the overall cost of
the project.
California • Hazard Grant. This program provides Federal Cities,counties HES program 90%federal Caltrans Division of
Department of Elimination Discretionary funds for highway safety and other local on a 3 year share for Planning
Transportation Safety funds vary Improvement projects on all governments cycle,updated standard 1120 N Street
(Caltrans) Program every year Federal-aid systems. TEA-21 annually. safety projects P.O.Box 942873
amended the Hazard Elimination although some Sacramento,CA
Program to allow States to survey safety projects 95814
and correct hazards to bicyclists may be 100% Tel: 914-324-6514
and pedestrians. reimbursable
California Bridge Grant Funds are available for bridge Cities and Project No local match Caltrans Division of Bridge projects must be
Department of Repair and Approximately rehabilitation and replacement. county selection required Structures incorporated into the Regional
Transportation Replacement $260M All bridges are eligible and agencies,park is made in specifically Local Assistance and Transportation Improvement Plan.
(Caltrans) Program annually. on-system bridges are eligible and recreation October. for bicycle Programming Branch
for discretionary funding. When districts. All accommodations. 1801 30th Street
a highway bridge deck is being agencies must Sacramento,CA
replaced or rehabilitated with have a city, 95816
federal funds,the bridge- county or transit Tel: 916-227-8023
deck must provide bicyde operator as a Contact: Gene Cowley
accommodations,if access is sponsor.
not fully controlled. Bicycles
are permitted to operate at
each end of the bridge,if it is
determined that bicycles can be
accommodated at a reasonable
cost.
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan H 1
Appendi_
1111 11.
California Contracted CCC rarely The mission of the CCC is to Projects None Sierra District Contact:
Conservation youth labor has any provide meaningful work and must provide PLACER ENERGY
Corps(CCC) force. independent education opportunities to a natural CENTER
funding to pay assist young men and women resource or 3710 Christian Valley
for project in becoming employable,while other public Road
implementation protecting and enhancing benefit and Auburn,CA 95602
California's environment,human provide Tel: (530)823-4900
resources and communities. corpsmembers Fax:(530)823-4911
with education
and training.
California Habitat Grants. $2M HCF was established by the Local units of Applications Program requires California Department $2 million is available for
Department Conservation total available California Wildlife Protection of governments due October a dollar-for-dollar of Parks and competitive grants each year
of Parks and Fund Program per year.In 1990. It provides matching funds are eligible: 1st. match and the Recreation through 2020. Four of the six
Recreation FY00/01.14 fro the acquisition,enhancement, cities,counties match must be P.O.Box 942896 categories are rotated so that each
projects were and restoration of wildlife areas or districts. Six from a non-state Sacramento,CA category is funded twice in evey
funded.(range and for programs that bring urban types of eligible source. 94296-0001 three-year period.
$20K-$356K) residents into park and wildlife projects: 1) Attn: Planning and
areas. Deer/mountain Local Services
lion habitat; 2) Tel: 916-653-7423
Habitat for rare,
endangered,
threatened or
fully protected
species;3)
wetland habitat;
4)riparian
habitat,5)
anadromous
salmonids/trout
habitat;6)trails,
programs,urban
access. _
California Recreational Matching funds. RTP provides funds for Cities,Counties, Applications RTP is a California Department The RTP,formerly the National
Department Trails Program $2.2M total recreational trails and trails- districts,state due October matching of Parks and Recreational Trails Fund Act
of Parks and available in related projects. The RTP is agencies, 1st. program that Recreation Program,is funded under the
Recreation FY00/01.19 administered,at the federal and nonprofit provides up P.O.Box 942896 Transportation Equity Act for the
projects were level,by the Federal Highway organizations to 80%of the Sacramento,CA 21st Centry(TEA-21).The funds
funded.(range Administration. It is administered with project costs. 94296-0001 are from a portion of the revenue
$10K-$200K) at the state level by the CA Dept. management The remainder Attn: Planning and received by the FHTF from the
of Parks and Rec. Nonmotorized responsibilities must come from Local Services federal motor fuel excise tax paid
projects are administered by over public non-federal Tel: 916-653-7423 by motorcycles,ATVs,and off-road
the Dept.'s Planning and Local lands are sources. light trucks.
Services Section. eligible to apply.
B.-t> Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
Appendix B
California Per Capita Grants per Safe Neighborhood Parks, Cities,counties Nevada County California Department 60%of the total funds available
Department Grant Program capita. (Range Clean Water,Clean Air and and districts is listed as of Parks and shall be allocated to cities and to
of Parks and I(Statewide) minimum Coastal Protection Bond Act of in line for Recreation districts,other than a regional park
Recreation $30K for city 2000"(Proposition 12)provides appropriations. P.O.Box 942896 district,regional park and open-
or districts that funds allocated for this The amounts Sacramento,CA space district,or regional open-
and S150K to program be used for projects will be 94296-0001 space district. 40%of the total
counties) that accomplish the following: 1) determined Attn: Local Services funds available shall be allocated to
rehabilitate facilities at existing after public Tel: 916-653-7423 counties and regional park district,
local parks;2)develop facilities hearings are regional park and open-space
that promote positive alternatives held in late district,or regional open-space
for youth; 3)promote family winter or early district.
oriented recreation;4)provide spring.
open,safe,and accessible
local park lands,facilities,and
botanical gardens
California Roberti-Z berg- Grants-both Funds for this grant program Cites,counties, California Department
Department Harris Grant competitive are to be used for projects that districts and of Parks and
of Parks and Program and per capita accomplish the following:1) federally Recreation
Recreation (block) Rehabilitate facilities at existing recognized P.O.Box 942896
local parks that will provide for California Indian Sacramento,CA
mare efficient management tribes 94296-0001
and reduced operational costs. Attn: Local Services
This may include grants to local Tel: 916-653-7423
agencies for the renovation of
recreational facilities conveyed to
local agencies resulting from the
downsizing and decommissioning
of federal military installations.
2)Develop facilities that promote
positive alternatives for youth
and that promote cooperation
between local park and recreation
service providers and youth-
serving nonprofit organizations.
3)Promote family oriented
recreation,including art activities.
4)Provide for open,safe,and
accessible local park lands,
facilities,and botanical gardens. t
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan " .
Appends
California Non-motorized Grants Development,improvement, Cities,counties, California Department
Department Trails Grant rehabilitation,restoration, districts,local of Parks and
of Parks and Program enhancement and interpretation agencies Recreation
Recreation of nonmotorized trails for the formed for P.O.Box 942896
purpose of increasing public park purposes, Sacramento,CA
access to,and enjoyment of, other districts, 94296-0001
public areas for increased and federally Attn: Local Services
recreation opportunities. recognized Tel: 916-653-7423
California Indian
tribes.
California Specified Grants Each year,there are local Cities,counties, Applications California Department The budgeted projects usually have
Department Grants- assistance park projects from districts,local for various of Parks and 2 years to be encumbered with a
of Parks and Various various sources that CA State agencies programs must Recreation contract and an additional 3 years
Recreation Programs Parks'Office of Grants and Local formed for be received by P.O.Box 942896 to expend the funds,for a total of
Services administers. General park purposes, April 15 of the Sacramento,CA 5 years.
Fund,Environmental License other districts, year the funds 94296-0001
Plate Fund,River Protection Sub- and federally expire. Attn: Local Services
account,Bond Funds and other recognized Tel: 916-653-7423
sources are typical of programs California Indian
that are managed under this tribes.
category.
California Land and Grants Federally administered by the Cities,counties Applications The program California Department California's allocation is$3.1
Department Water National Park Service,the Land and districts must be requires a dollar of Parks and million,and approximately$1 7
of Parks and Conservation and Water Conservation Fund received no for dollar match. Recreation million is available for grants to
Recreation Fund Program Program provides funds to federal later than June P.O.Box 942896 local agencies: $1 million for
agencies and all 50 states and 6 16th. Sacramento,CA Southern California and$700,000
territories. The money allocated 94296-0001 for Northern California.
to the states may be used for Attn: Local Services
statewide planning and for Tel: 916-653-7423
acquiring and developing outdoor
recreation areas and facilities.
-; Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
Appendix B
California Environmental Grants.$10M Grants for supplemental Any local, Applications Bill Borden, EEMP
Resources Enhancement available mitigation of the environmental state or federal are due in Coordinator
Agency &Mitigation statewide. impacts of modified or new public agency or November. California Resources
Program Individual transportation facilities. There nonprofit entity Agency
projects have a are three categories of eligible which can 1416 Ninth Street,
cap of$250K projects: 1)Resource Lands demonstrate Suite 1311
--projects for the acquisition. adequate Sacramento,CA
restoration or enhancement charter or 95814
of watersheds,wildlife habitat, enabling Tel: 916-653-5656
wetlands,forests,or other authority to Fax: 916-653-8102
significant natural areas;2) carry out
Highway Landscape and the project or Marsha Mason,
Urban Forestry--projects proposed. State Enhancements
designed to improve air quality Coordinator
through the planting of trees Ca'trans
and other suitable plants; 3) Ter 916-654-5275
Roadside Recreational Facilities
--projects for the acquisition
and/or development of roadside
recreational opportunities.
Possible projects include mass
transit guideways,park-n-ride
facilities,transit stations,tree
planting to equalize the effects
of vehicular emissions,and the
acquisition or development of
roadside recreation facilities such
as trails.
California Public Access Not grants. Funds for the acquisition or Local units of February, 50%local Georgia Lipphardt
Department Program but rather improvements with preserve governments May,August, matching funds Wildlife Conservation
of Fish and state projects wildlife habitat or provide are eligible and November required for Board
Game developed in recreational access for hunting, local sponsor quarterly fishing pier California Department
cooperation fishing or other wildlife oriented must do deadlines, projects(not of Fish and Game
with local recreation. Qualifying projects engineering and required for other 1416 Ninth Street
governments. include developments such as EIR projects). Sacramento,CA
Funding can be fishing piers or floats,access 95814
up to$250K trails or roads,boat launch Tel: 916-445-8448
ramps,wildlife observation and Fax: 916-323-0280
interpretive trails,lake or stream
improvements,restrooms and
parking areas.
LOCAL FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES ,
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan B I c
Append
Nevada Transportation Each county, Caltrans funding administered Cities and The 1.1 Million 5%local match Dan Landon The Town of Truckee has received
County Enhancement under the through local Regional Towns within allocated for required. Nevada County $390,000 in TEA money already.
Transportation Activities distribution Transportation Authority Nevada County, Nevada County Transportation
Commission Program formulas,is Representatives,transportation CA has already Commission
guaranteed enhancement activities must been allocated 101 Providence Mine
a minimum have a direct relationship-by to specific Road,Suite 102
amount function,proximity or impact-to projects. Next Nevada City,CA
the intermodal transportation cycle will 95959
system. Funds can be used probably begin Tel:(530)265-3202
for among other things bicycle in 2004. Fax:(530)265-3260
and pedestrian access to mass http://wwwnctc.ca.gov
transportation,including bicycle
storage facilities and installing
equipment for transporting
bicycles on mass transportation
vehicles.
Nevada Local Small Grant State sponsored program that Cities and Applications No match Dan Landon
County Transportation (only-30,000 refunds a portion of local sales Towns within are usually due required Nevada County
Transportation Fund, per year for the tax monies(1/4 of every cent)is Nevada County, in January. Transportation
Commission Transportation entire region) returned to the county of origin. CA Commission
Development Up to two percent of funds can 101 Providence Mine
Act Article III be set aside for pedestrian and Road,Suite 102
bicycle facilities,and five percent Nevada City,CA
can be spent for supplementing 95959
other funds to implement bicycle Tel:(530)265-3202
safety education programs. Fax:(530)265-3260
http://www.nctc.ca.gov
PRIVATE FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES
The Kodak Grant.(max is Provides small grants to stimulate Local,regional March 1 -June The Conservation American Greenways
Conservation American $2,500;most the planning and design of or statewide 1. Fund
Fund Greenways range$500- greenways in communities nonprofit 1800 North Kent
Awards $1,000) throughout America. organizations. Street,Suite 1120
Program Public agencies Arlington,VA 22209
may also apply Tel: 703-525-6300
but community www.conservationfund
organizations org
will receive
preference.
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
Appendix B
California Earth Day Grant.(up to The mission of this Earth Day State Parks, December Earth Day
State Parks Restoration $2K) event is to launch a volunteer- community Work Day
Foundation and Cleanup supported event with an action parks, Grant Program
Program component that results in environmental California State
thousands of people working on non-profits,and Parks Foundation
restoration and cleanup projects schools 800 College Ave.
that will enhance shared public P.O.Box 548
environments and open spaces Kentfield,CA
throughout the stale. 94914
Tel: 415-258-
9975
Fax: 415-258-
9930
California California Grant.(range Develop new,creative action- Local,regional June 15th California Greenways Grants may be used for planning,
Trails& Greenways $500-$2,500) oriented greenway and trail or statewide Creative Grants assessments,surveying,
Greenways Creative projects. Assist grassroots nonprofit Program interpretation,construction or other
Foundation Grants greenways organizations. organizations. 663 Teresita Blvd creative projects. In general.grants
&The Program Leverage additional money for Public agencies San Francisco,CA can be used for all appropriate
Conservation conservation and greenway may also apply 94127 expenses needed to complete
Fund development and acquisition but community a greenway project including
Recognize and encourage organizations planning,technical assistance,legal
greenway proponents and will receive and other costs.
organizations preference.
Arco Environmental Grant.(range Programs designed to conserve Giving limited Application Arco Foundation The foundation supports rational
Foundation Programs $1K-$50K) and sustain the natural to areas of form not 515 South Flower land-use and natural resource
environment as well as those company required. No Street,AP-50 issues;environmental education
Recent that analyze and communicate operations. deadlines. Los Angeles,Ca programs,especially those which
merger with the trade-offs that environmental 90071 articulate the preservation of
BP means protection requires. Tel: 213-486-3342 ecologically unique land for public
Foundation's access;conservation of wildlife and
criteria/ protection of endangered species.
requirements
are being
revised. _ .
Chevron Chevron Grant.(range Chevron Corporation awards Various + March,July, Grants Administrator, Community Grants is for local
Companies Corporate $100-$100K) Corporate Grants to U.S.national November Chevron Corporation and regional programs in areas
Grants and or international programs in P.O.Box 7753 San where Chevron has facilities.
Chevron the following focus areas:1) Francisco,CA 94120- Projects funded in the following
Community education,with emphasis on 7753. areas: Conservation and Habitat
Grants efforts to promote excellence E-mail:chevweb@ Preservation; Wildlife Protection
in math and science education, chevron.com Environmental Education;and
human resources development, Telephone:(415)894- Conservation Awards.
and equal access and quality in 7700.
schools;and 2)the environment, http:/lwww.chevron.
with emphasis on conservation or com/communityfindex.
habitat and wildlife preservation. html
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
Appendi
The Outdoor Grant FUNDING CRITERIA Various In January and Jil Zilligen
Conservation Industry 1.The project should be focused in August Patagonia
Alliance Conservation primarily on direct citizen action 259 W.Santa Clara
Alliance Grant to protect and enhance our Street
natural resources for recreation. Ventura CA 93001
Were not looking for mainstream Tel: 707-961-0776
education or scientific research
projects,but rather for active
campaigns. 2.All projects should
be quantifiable,with specific
goals,objectives and action
plans,and should include a
measure for evaluating success
3.The project should have a
good chance for closure or
significant measurable results
over a fairly short term(one to
two years).
National Fish Challenge Grants. The Foundation awards challenge Federal,state, June 1st and At least a 2:1 Eric Hammerling,
and Wildlife Grants (usually range grants to projects that:Address local agencies, October 15th ratio of matching Grants Manager
Foundation between$25K- priority actions promoting fish non-profits, (for pre- funds Tel: 916-484-1692
$75K) and wildlife conservation and schools,tribes, proposals) Fax: 916-484-0764
the habitats on which they organizations
depend;Work proactively to and public and
involve other conservation private partners.
and community interests;
Leverage Foundation provided
funding;and Evaluate project
outcomes.The Foundation
makes strategic investments
in conservation projects,
especially those that address
one or more of the following
priorities Habitat protection and
restoration on private lands:
Sustainable communities through
conservation;and Conservation
education.
B-18 Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
Appendix B
Appendix B
Exhibit 3 — Financing Techniques
I
I
Appendix B,Exhibit 3 Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
Appendix B
Exhibit 3- Financing Techniques
1. Long-term Bonds:
a) General obligation bonds—sometimes,park and recreation protects have been packaged in general capital funding
measures,and in other instances,open space programs have been funded by a separate bond or paired with related
environmental programs to increase voter appeal. All such initiatives require carefully planned strategy.
b) Revenue bonds—these bonds are unaffected by the ceilings that constrain general obligation debt. Also, voter
approval is not necessarily required because government is not obligated to repay the debt if the revenue stream
does not flow as predicted. However,these are often costlier to package than general obligation bonds
c) Private activity bonds—these bonds can be issued by nonprofit land conservation organizations to finance a specific
transaction or to attain a more general line of credit for projects. They can enable nonprofit organizations to take a
more direct role in financing projects.
2. Short-term Debt Instruments:
There are a variety of both tax-exempt and non-tax-exempt debt instruments such as revenue, bond, and tax anticipation
warrants; promissory notes;drafts; and other variations that local governments can use to secure money.These short-term
options are useful if a government faces limitations on bonding but has assurances of revenues or other income to cover the
debt service of a loan until the funds are received.
3. Alternative Financing Techniques:
a) Lease/Purchase contract—this method is used when a decision has been made to buy property but up-front funds
are unavailable. With this arrangement,acquisition can be paid for in periodic payments,or installments,that include
principal, interest, and associated costs.
b) Certificates of participation—a variation on the leasing theme structured to enable a group of investors to buy
proportionate shares in a tax-exempt income from a lease, pursuant to a lease/purchase agreement.
c) Securitized Installment sales—Government is borrowing, in effect,from the landowner through an installment sale
(needs a non-profit intermediary).
d) Real Estate Transfer Taxes—this tax taps a percentage of funds generated by development and is relatively easy to
collect and increases with the size of the property involved in the transaction.
e) Sales tax—set aside from the sales tax can tap into tourism profits generated by open space amenities but can also
decline if the economy slows down.
f) Trust fund or Endowment fund—land conservation advocates often establish trust funds that earmark revenue
sources to build up a sizeable, sustainable principal that can spin off regular earnings to pay for acquisition and
management of parks and open space. Of course, a source of funds is needed for the trust fund; most often used
include general appropriations(either one-time or ongoing), lotteries, mitigation funds, special taxes, user fees, and
severance payments on natural resources extracted from public lands.
g) Benefit assessment districts—as special municipal districts, benefit assessment districts create a financing
mechanism to provide community services. facilities,or infrastructure within defined boundaries. Typically, a levy
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
Appendix B
is placed on individual parcels, and the assessment is structured so that land-owners pay in proportion to their
benefit, which may mean a flat surtax per property or a percentage of value. For example: Mello-Roos Community
Facilities Act—California enabling legislation that provides a way for residents in a new and growing community to
assess themselves to pay for common facilities with a life of 5+years including bike paths, lanes and pedestrian
facilities. Defining the boundaries of the benefit district may be difficult unless the facility is part of a larger parks and
recreation or public infrastructure program with broad community benefits and support.
h) Mitigation banks—natural land set aside to allow developers to compensate for the adverse impacts of development
(often the degradation of wetlands) in a location other than the development site.
i) Pay-as-you-go approach—instead of large-scale borrowing,cities will pay for projects as they are able. Important
advantages include saving financing costs and a reflection of the fiscal choices of the current electorate.
Disadvantages are that project costs are not spread over the useful life of the asset or among future as well as
present beneficiaries.
j) Land exchanges—local govemments might consider the possibility of acquiring property through an exchange.
Making an exchange work usually takes a long time and can be difficult to match the values in the exchange.
Exchanging unwanted public property for sought-after park land often needs the participation of a nonprofit
intermediary who is willing to pay the landowner off in cash and then going through the process of completing the
exchange with the public agency.
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan B19
Appendix B
Appendix B
Exhibit 4 — Case Studies
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan Appendix B,Exhibit 4
Appendix B
Exhibit 4• Non•profitlFoundation Case Studies
Tahoe Rim Trail (TRT)Association in Lake Tahoe, CA& NV
Established in 1981,the TRT Association is a volunteer non-profit 501(c)3 organization that was formed for the purpose of planning,
constructing and maintaining the Tahoe Rim Trail, The group's mission is to build,promote and maintain a rim trail system providing
access to the beauty of the Lake Tahoe Region. Currently, the trail is a 150-mile long, 24-inch wide, single-track trail that is open to hik-
ers,equestrians and mountain bikers. The trail encompasses the ridge tops of the Lake Tahoe Basin and includes two states and six
different counties. Additionally, the TRT overlaps with roughly 50 miles of the Pacific Crest National Scenic Trail.
For the past 20 years,the main focus of the group has been the successful completion of the loop trail. Now,TRT Association is mov-
ing away from trail building to focus their efforts on trail maintenance and advocacy.According to Boardmember, Jennifer Hogler,the
"Tahoe Rim Trail is nationally recognized as an award-winning example of cooperation between government agencies and the private
sector."
For more information,visit: http://www.tahoerimtrail.org
Mountain Trails Foundation in Park City, UT
Serving Park City and Summit,Wasatch,and Morgan Counties in Utah,the Mountain Trails Foundation's mission is working to ensure
non-motorized multiple-use access to a variety of trails throughout this region and beyond. The Foundation is dedicated to working
with volunteers to secure continued access to existing trails in the region and to build new trails to serve both recreation and transporta-
tion needs.
They work with federal, state, and local government and with private property owners to achieve important trail connections,and to
preserve access into and through new development. The Foundation is also involved with a trail user education and etiquette program
to avoid trail conflicts. They also sponsor an adopt-a-trail program that allows individuals or business entities a chance to adopt signifi-
cant or entire lengths of trails and provide signs and maintenance for those trails.
For more information,visit: http://www.mountaintrails.org
Colorado Trail Foundation,CO
The Colorado Trail Foundation is a non-profit organization that maintains the Colorado Trail,which stretches 500 miles of the state's
mountainsides from Denver to Durango. The Colorado Trail crosses eight mountain ranges, seven national forests, six wilderness
areas and five river systems. Public agencies and private sector representatives govern the Foundation. The Colorado Trail Founda-
tion recruits and trains volunteers for trail construction, coordinates the Adopt-A-Trail maintenance program, and distributes information
on Colorado Trail activities,trail crews, and publications.
The Colorado Trail Foundation is funded by contributions from the Friends of the Colorado Trail and by proceeds from the sale of mate-
rials. They have an extensive volunteer program in which thousands of volunteers come from every state and even other countries to
work on building trails, improving and restoring existing trails,and providing signage and information on the trail.
For more information, visit: http://www.coloradotrail,org
B-20 Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
Appendix B
Friends of Webster Trails, NY
The mission of this volunteer non-profit group is to manage and promote the Hojack Trail, Vosburg Hollow Wild Area and other trails
and linear parks in partnership with the Town of Webster near Rochester, New York for educational and recreational purposes. The
group is involved with membership recruitment and fundraising for the town's trail systems. The group works in concert with Webster's
Parks and Recreation Department, Highway Department and other public agencies. The group has undertaken signage and mainte-
nance duties on the trails and is involved in acquiring more public land to extend current and build new trails for Webster.
For more information,visit: http://www.ggw.org/webstertrails
PATH Foundation in Atlanta,GA
PATH was started several years ago by three Atlanta citizens who were tired of having to bicycle and jog in the streets. The group
worked with other individuals, corporations, and foundations to build over 20 miles of greenway trails in the metropolitan Atlanta area
and plan to build over 60 more mites that will link neighborhoods and business centers with public transportation.
PATH has formed partnerships with several local governments as well as local volunteer and advocacy groups to build greenway
trails. PATH provides the staff and expertise to plan,design, build and maintain trail projects, In some cases, PATH will even provide
matching funds to finance the development of trails. Local government provides access to state and federal funding as well as in-kind
services during trail development. PATH and local governments work together to develop linking trail projects to give everyone access
to the trail system. Funding for PATH comes from individual donations and corporate sponsorship.
Maintenance for some PATH trails is encouraged through a volunteer adoption program. Through their Adopt-A-Trail program, "adop-
tive parents"are asked to adopt their section for at least one year. Duties include, but are not necessarily limited to frequent rides!
walks on the trail to identify any needs,trimming around signs after mowing,graffiti removal, and elective beautification such as plant-
ings, bird houses, yard art,etc. In return, PATH erects a sign on the adopted segment identifying the adoptive parents.
For more information,visit: http://www.pathfoundation.org
I
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan B-21
Appendix B
Appendix C
References
Appendix C Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
Appendix C
References & Literature Cited
California Department of Transportation. 2001. Chapter 1000: Bikeway Planning and Design, Highway Design Manual.
California Highway Patrol, Truckee Substation. July 2000.
City of Park City, Utah. 1992. Trails Master Plan Update.
County of Placer, California. June, 2001. Placer Legacy Open Space and Agriculture Conservation Program..
County of Placer, California. 2001 —draft. Martis Valley Community Plan update.
Nevada County Transportation Commission. 1991. Nevada County Bicycle Master Plan.
Placer County Transportation Planning Agency. 2001 —draft. Placer County Regional Bikeway Plan.
Pitkin County, Colorado and Cimarron Design. 1994. Trails Design Management Handbook.
Santa Clara County, California. 1995. Countywide Trails Master Plan Update& Environmental Impact Report.
Town of Vail, Colorado and Design Workshop, Denver. 1995. Comprehensive Open Lands Plan.
Town of Truckee, California. November 2000. Town of Truckee Development Code.
Town of Truckee, California. November 1997. Downtown Truckee Specific Plan,Volumes 1 -4,
Town of Truckee, California. February 1996. Truckee General Plan,Volumes 1-4.
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan C-1
Appendix C
Appendix D
Exhibit 1 - Local Map
Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan Appendix D,Exhibit 1
9 f 7
» , 36 .t ?:
( J yS , '� k Nor Cr..kRC r-• ',27 k / •
s
r
dv `�dK p e ' `
S, tom.•. t i 4 0 ? e
i j ti n
I
•
7M.
2
r K 9 Z
a
.,r — 33 ■ iCr
v-a`p I� 7s qu 1 l i"' < .1
Man;.Valley Trap
40/ ConnwllOn ,
O.
-r i.
704r ' r 0.
a�, Miles
G� 06 00 0 06
Existing Trail -Actual Route Proposed Appendix D Exhibit 1
Class I Bike Path --- Class I Bike Path Local Map
Class II Bike Lane - - . Class I With Unpaved Element EXISTING AND PROPOSED
Class II Bike Lane TRAIL AND BIKEWAY NETWORK
Class Ill Bike Route As of 1 013 012 01 2
Recreational Trail-Earthen - - ' Class Ill Bike Route !l!&
° - ' Recreational Trail-Surface IBD TOWN OF TRUC KEE
Pan M WFPSO:nan,eanna4Tre•and Pie Larwa120012 Bikana,.M.o20,2 BIW,a,a Map updaM 1...0
MIN Ill.
Appendix D
Exhibit 2 — Bikeway Map
I
I
Appendix D,Exhibit 2 Truckee Trails&Bikeways Master Plan
Truckee Trails& Bikeways Master Plan '-`
s ���� -
ON-STREET BIKEWAY MAP ► ' ��
W 4:>.-F I .1. I 1__1 r--7- ,•
r —
�. r...- ---- -1----?"---- -, ,Iik.....;:o.e.), -t,,,_;
� tat. � ;_�i;� i l i!. . ,....„
S-7==in � - r
r „ . .,., ......, ,.. .. i.,..,,,..... .,:.....:
i — s..:• 4,41111 2 ,...: -,40 , »,. . .(3-_-. ,..). . 1 %Milli ,.
____,___--- i`. 2.1 l .L,4 . VO..r* IS ,• Makardialitri , IIIPUP NA
ME r - 1 j!.-4.w. :/' II II
- '" +y-+III �1� r•�_411�1<,4 �L
• 411W'"...- 11110?-fikl—..e- • - ..; --..,,r � � •
.....
..,,,
��I\ -- - — �� •
_ . ,_,_ ,
- 11...w<,..,,m.,W ■�� ---
•■•■••■ ■••■•.,(Um f HA 4..M.*•Nor Mal ha 16.1 I auk :
Ma 1
Appendix D-Exhibit 2
OM