Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAboutA 2007-04-25 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD~~ f ~~"L.C of City of ~Y~T~®®Trrvor;_vrwaoo [ ~.'~.I ,-r..,n nr[IP7~ au.e~ c}~ City vtAeeting ChaQQenges {5 ~fl}(r~ j} ryryry} I ; !'l1'1l ~ =J tUUf I ~ I' 11330 BULLIS ROAD A~i~ LYNWOOD, CALIFORNIA 90262 7 & ~~' }^,t',.; 12 ~~~, ~~ a t -a : t . ~~t~t5;f (310) 603-0220 ~~ AG E fV DA ~"~` LYNVli00D DESIGN r1~fVIEUV BOARD CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11330 BULLIS ROAD LYNWOOD, CA 90262 April 25, 2007 3:30 p.M. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEMBERS Margarita Diaz Donald Dove Walter Lopez Board Member Chair Board Member Alex Benevides Peter Perez Vice Chair Board Member BOARD COUNSEL Law Offices of Beltran & Medina Arnoldo Beltran STAFF Grant Taylor, Director Development Services Jonathan Colin, Dev. Services Manager Kimberly Gonzalez, Administrative Analyst I H:AWOIIDFILE~PLANNING~IGENDAWvbapn125,2002doc Karen Figueredo, Planning Assistant 1 OPENING CEREMONIES 1. Call meeting to order. 2. Flag Salute. 3. Roll call of Commissioners. 4. Certification of Agenda Posting. 5. Minutes of Design Review Board Meetings: March 28, 2007 PUBLIC ORALS 6. At this time, any member of the public may comment on any issue within the jurisdiction of the Design Review Board. CONTINUED ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION 7. Murals -Lynwood Municipal Code Chapter 25.70 APPLICANT: City of Lynwood Properties City-wide Proposal The Lynwood City Council has directed staff to have the Design Review Board assess the sign ordinance set forth in Lynwood Municipal Code Section 25.70. Specifically, the City Council is concerned with business complaints due to enforcement actions that murals require Planning Commission approval and the definition of a mural. Recommendation Staff recommends that the Design Review Board discuss murals including definition, process, and parameters, provide recommendations, and accept a presentation from Consuelo Marshall. NEW ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION 8. Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-07 Tentative Parcel Mao No. 2007-01 Zone Change No. 2007-01 APPLICANT: Oakwood Plaza LLC 3211 Oakwood Avenue & 3198 Los Flores Boulevard APN 6170-039-017, 034, 035 and 036 H'.AWORDFILBPLANMkGAAGHNDAAdebapn125,2009-0oc -2- Proposal Request to construct acommercial/residential mixed use project, four-stories in height with 15,000 square feet of commercial on the first floor, 129 parking stalls on the first and second floors and nineteen condominiums on the third and fourth floors. The building would total 40,040 square feet on a parcel totaling 48,734 square feet in area on property located at 3211 Oakwood Avenue and 3198 Los Flores Boulevard in the C-3 (Heavy Commercial) and P-1 (Parking) zones. Recommendation Staff recommends that the Design Review Board consider the design, provide recommendations and support the project to the Lynwood Planning Commission. 9. Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-08 APPLICANT: Maria Sandoval 12726 Waldorf Drive APN 6186-022-023 Proposal Request to construct two (2) detached residences, one-story in height with three (3) attached two-car garages. The existing residence at the front of the property would remain. The existing 12'-6" driveway would be utilized for access. The property totals 9,850 square feet in area and is located at 12726 Waldorf Drive in the R-3 (Multiple-Family Residential) zone. Recommendation Staff recommends that the Design Review Board consider the design, provide recommendations and support the project to the Lynwood Planning Commission. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD ORALS STAFF ORALS AD70lYRNMENT Adjourn to the regular meeting of the Lynwood Design Review Board on May 30, 2007 at 3:30 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 11330 Bullis Road, Lynwood, California. H9WORDFtI,E~PI,ANNING~ACF.NDAAdrbepnp5,200'l.~oc -3- AGENDA ITEM 5 MINUTES LYNWOOD DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MEETING. March 28, 20®7 The Lynwood Design Review Board met in regular session in the City Hall Council Chambers. Director of Development Services Taylor called the meeting to order at 6:34 p.m. City Clerk Andrea Hooper led the flag salute. Director of Development Services Taylor called roll. Board Members Dove, Benevides, Perez, Diaz and Lopez answered the roll call. Director of Development Services Taylor stated the agenda had been duly posted in accordance with the Brown Act. There were no minutes as this is the first meeting of the Design Review Board. City Clerk Hooper performed swearing in procedures and reviewed conflict of interest laws with the Board Members. Director of Development Services Taylor announced Item #7, Organization of Board Members and requested nominations. Donald Dove was elected Chair by general consensus. Alex Benevides was elected Vice Chair by general consensus. Chair Dove inquired if their were any public orals. None. ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION Item #9: Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-06. Tentative 'Tract Nla@No. 2007-01 (68944), Variance No. 2007-03, Tenant Impact Report and Negative ®eclaration / Ynitial Study APPLICANT: Carlin Avenue Village LLC 4307 - 4309 Carlin Avenue APN 6186-011-083 Chair Dove announced agenda item #9 and requested a staff report. Director of Development Services Taylor presented the staff report and stated the project request is to close and demolish an existing trailer park, develop twenty-two (22) detached residences, two- stories in height, with attached two-car garages on property located at 4307 - 4309 Carlin Avenue in the R-2 (Two-Family Residential) zone. The applicant also requests to subdivide one parcel in twenty- two lots, a variance to reduce garage widths and allow for tandem parking for six of the residences, a tenant impact report identifying relocation benefits for trailer owners and environmental review consisting of a Negative Declaration /Initial Study. The property totals 1.06 acres in area. Mr. Taylor introduced applicant Gary Pomeroy and requested a brief presentation on his project. Gary Pomeroy, 3300 Irvine Avenue, Suite #25, Newport Beach, CA 92660 introduced his team, summarized the history of the trailer park, their purchase and attempts to relocate the tenants and proceed with the project. Mr. Pomeroy stated there are twenty-two spaces of which eight tenants remain including six trailer owners. Sixteen of the new homes would be market rate residences, two- stories in height with either two or three bedrooms and two bathrooms with 1,183 square feet of living area. The market rate residences would have stucco siding, concrete the roof, stone veneer, the gable vents, and aluminum roll up garage doors. Six residences would be affordable housing for the remaining trailer owners consisting of one-story with a loft, a bedroom, bathroom and 676 square feet of living area with a tandem garage port. The affordable units would consist of stucco siding and composition asphalt roofs. Mr. Pomeroy discussed the density bonus, existing tenants want to stay and can stay in the six residences as long as they want and if they move out within five years they receive $10,000 or they can - take $20,000 to move right away. Board Member Lopez inquired about some tenants may stay and some may leave immediately. Director of Development Services Taylor stated six residences are affordable for ten years as set forth in the Tenant Impact report. Even if some trailer owners leave right away six residences will remain affordable for ten years. Board Member Benevides recommended that the six affordable residences have concrete the roofs to match the market rates units. The arch on the market rate units should be designed architecturally consistent with the loft units. Mr. Pomeroy stated they could change the roofs and arches to be consistent. Director of Development Services Taylor said staff prefers the concrete the roofs and conditions could be added to require amended plans prior to building plan check. Chair Dove inquired about yard area. Mr. Pomeroy referred to the site and floor plans identifying the individual lots would have four and six foot yard areas with a zero lot line on one side. Mr. Pomeroy also identified the two common open space areas with one side for adults and the other for children. Board Member Lopez inquired about the upstairs bathroom window on the rear elevation recommending that it be reduced in size so as not to be so obtrusive. Mr. Pomeroy stated the window is over the shower and could be reduced and separated from the bedroom window more. Chair Dove requested staff to summarize the recommendations. Director of Development Services Taylor stated the Board Members recommended: 1) Change composition asphalt roofs to concrete tile; 2) Change arches over balconies on market rate residences to be consistent with loft units; 3) Reduce the upstairs rear bathroom window in size. Motion by Board Member Lopez to recommend approval of the design subject to the three conditions, seconded by Vice Chair Benevides. Chair Dove requested roll call. Director of Development Services Taylor called roll and the motion to approve passed 5-0. Item #b0: Sign Ordinance - Lynwood INunicimal Code Chapter 25.70 APPLICANT: City of Lynwood Properties City-wide Chair Dove announced item #10 and requested a staff report. Director of Development Services Taylor presented the staff report and stated the Lynwood City Council directed staff to have the Design Review Board assess the sign ordinance set forth in Lynwood Municipal-Code Section 25.70. Specifically, the Council is concerned with business complaints resulting from enforcement actions that the zoning code prohibits painted wall signs and requires Planning Commission approval for murals. Mr. Taylor stated painted walls signs have letters or numbers of pictures of products sold or offered at a business. Murals are artistic expressions that are not utilized for advertising purposes. Murals are difficult to define but can lead to clutter and blight. Development Services Manager Colin summarized the attached power point presentation that included an overview of the business license division, what businesses must do, other cities codes regarding painted wall signs, enforcement efforts, and before and after photographs of business improvements. Chair Dove stated he prefers individual channel letters and does not support painted wall signs. Board Member Lopez commented on the photographs and how the after pictures show marked improvement. Mr. Lopez stated a clutter of signs can block out businesses and are intended to promote businesses. Mr. Lopez inquired about freestanding signs, banners on poles projecting over the streets and the need for attractive signs that help the business owner promote his business. Director of Development Services Taylor stated freestanding signs are permitted. Monument signs cannot exceed eight feet and freestanding signs cannot exceed 60 feet. Banners are currently only permitted on buildings for not more than 60 days but the Long Beach Boulevard Specific Plan allows banners on light poles. Chair Dove stated signs are necessary for business publicity but they should be neat, clean and uniform. Bad signs may chase away customers. Board Member Lopez stated painted wall signs are often tacky and unprofessional. Board Member Diaz inquired if wood or metal signs were allowed. Director of Development Services Taylor stated signs with wood or metal backing could be approved if aesthetically attractive. Director of Development Services Taylor asked the Board their thoughts on murals. Board Member Lopez stated murals can be attractive if they are well done and not too big. Inquired what the definition of a mural is. Director of Development Services Taylor stated the Lynwood Municipal Code only identifies a mural as an artistic expression not utilized for advertisement. Mr. Taylor stated murals require Planning Commission approval. Mr. Taylor suggested it may be more appropriate for the Grants & Marketing Division of the City to review murals as they have hired an art expert and created an Arts in Public Places (AIPP) Committee. Development Services Manager Colin commented that murals are often graffiti or painted wall signs and have become a problem due to the large proliferation. Chair Dove stated it may be more appropriate to have the art specialist review murals rather than the Design Review Board or Planning Commission as she is trained and has expertise. Board Member Lopez inquired about City fees for murals and suggested a minimal fee. Director of Development Services Taylor stated mural fees are the same as sign permit fees, $108. Vice Chair Benevides suggested that a mural ordinance should have a clear definition, consistency and parameters. Board Member Lopez suggested murals should be the exception and not the norm for businesses and suggested clear definition. Development Services Manager Colin stated without clear rules and standards murals are out of control and enforcement is difficult. Director of Development Services Taylor commented a clear definition is crucial as well as standards to include maximum size, number of murals, allowed for advertising or strictly art expression. Mr. Taylor suggested having Consuelo Marshall, the art expert attend the next meeting. Chair Dove suggested that murals should not be used for advertising and should not have words or numbers. Board Member Lopez suggested staff obtain more information and have Ms. Marshall come to the next meeting. Director of Development Services Taylor asked the Board their recommendation on painted wall signs and murals. The Board Members unanimously opposed painted wall signs and could support murals subject to definition and standards. By general consensus the mural review was continued, a definition requested and Ms. Marshall attend the next meeting. DESIGN REVIElN BOARD ORALS No comments. STAFF ORALS Director of Development Services Taylor thanked the Design Review Board Members for their time and commitment. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Board Member Lopez to adjourn, seconded by Vice Chair Benevides. Chair Dove adjourned the meeting at 6:08 p.m. AGENDA ITEM 7 MURALS DATE: April 25, 2007 TO: Honorable Members of the Design Review Board FROM: Grant Taylor, Director of Development Services Jonathan Colin, Development Services Manager SUBJECT: Sign Ordinance -MURALS Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Board discuss murals including definition, process, and parameters, provide recommendations, and accept a presentation from Consuelo Marshall. Background: The Development Services Department has been actively pursuing to control the aesthetic impact of signage on the community by restricting the location, size, and appearance of advertising signs. A number of murals have been installed without review or approval that affects the visual and aesthetic characteristics of the commercial corridors. At the last Design Review Board meeting on March 28, 2007 the Board considered murals, requested a definition, process and standards for reviewing and approving murals. The DRB requested that Consuelo Marshall provide a presentation and answer questions at the next meeting. Discussion & Analysis: Chapter 25.70 of the Lynwood Municipal Code (LMC) sets forth general regulations for the use of, and other exterior advertising formats, including murals within the City of Lynwood. Sign regulations are established to promote the public health, safety, and welfare by safeguarding and enhancing properly values. The bottom line with murals is quality control as the aesthetic appearance can make or break a commercial corridor. LMC Section 25.70.030.A.1.c (Restricted Signs -Use Permits Restrictions) states "Murals; Not used for advertising, subject to approval by the Planning Commission". Murals are considered artistic expressions not used for advertising purposes. Murals generally do not include numbers, letters, products or services provided at the location. A mural does not provide facts. The legalities of murals in terms of their protection by State and Federal laws have to do with whether the works is a work for hire, who owns the copyright to the work, the status of the artist and other issues. H:\WORDFILE\PLANNINC\S'fAFFRPT~nemo deb murols.4-25-09.doc I Areas of concern pertaining to murals include but are not limited to definition, size, number, review procedure, review person or body, permitting and fees. A mural's roots can be found in the universal desire that led prehistoric people to create cave paintings and the desire to decorate their surroundings and express their ideas and beliefs. The Romans produced large numbers of murals, but mural painting reached its highest degree of creative achievement in Europe with the work of Renaissance masters. In the 20`h century, the mural was embraced by artists in Paris, revolutionary painters in Mexico and depression-era artists of the United States. A definition of a mural could be "painting applied to and made integral with the surface of a wall or ceiling". It is difficult to limit the size or number of murals as they are artistic expressions. A mural generally encompasses an entire wall or large portion of the wall as opposed to signs that are installed in a limited area. An artist expression may include more than one mural on more than one surface. Currently, the LMC requires that the Planning Commission review murals and the Development Services Department, Planning Division issue permits. It would be appropriate for a person or body that is trained in review and make recommendations. Either Consuelo Marshall and/or the Arts in Public Places Committee would be better qualified to review mural applications and forward the recommendation to staff. Review of a mural prior to installation is crucial. Staff recommends that a person submit a written application describing the proposed mural, to include a photograph of the proposed location, drawing of the design (maquette), and qualifications of the artist. After the mural application is reviewed and approved, City staff could issue a sign permit over the counter that costs $108 or further review by the Design Review Board and/or Planning Commission could be mandated. Consuelo Marshall will make a presentation, answer questions and make recommendations. HiW02DFILEVPLANNINGASTAFFRP'I'~n~emo deb mwals 4-25-07.doo AGENDA ITEM 8 CUP NO. 2007-07 TPM NO. 2007-01 ZC N0. 2007-01 DATE: April 25, 2007 TO: Honorable Members of the Design Review Board FROM: Grant Taylor, Director of Development Services SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-07 Tentative Parcel Map No. 2007-01 Zone Change No. 2007-01 Negative Declaration /Initial Study 3211 Oakwood Avenue & 3198 Los Flores Boulevard APN 6170-039-017, 034, 035 and 036 Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Board consider the design, provide recommendations and support the project to the Lynwood Planning Commission. Background: The applicant, Oakwood Plaza LLC, is requesting approval to construct a commercial/residential mixed use project, four-stories in height with 15,000 square feet of commercial building area on the first floor, 129 parking stalls on the first and second floors and nineteen (19) two-story condominiums on the third and fourth floors. The total building area proposed is 40,040 square feet. The subject property totals 48,734 square feet in area and is located on the west side of Long Beach Boulevard between Oakwood Avenue and Los Flores Boulevard. The Lynwood Redevelopment Agency has granted conceptual approval and the project is consistent with the Long Beach Boulevard Specific Plan that encourages mixed use developments in Spanish Mediterranean style architecture. Discussion & Analysis: The site plan identifies the structure located near the front property line adjacent to Long Beach Boulevard with first floor parking located to the rear of the lot consisting of fifty stalls. Ten-foot front and street side yards would be provided with decorative landscaping. Vehicle access would be provided from Oakwood Avenue and Los Flores Boulevard. A total of 1,710 square feet of landscaping or 8.5% is provided on the ground floor area to include a public art or water feature located at the corner of Long Beach Boulevard and Los Flores Boulevard. The trash enclosure and mechanical equipment are located to the rear (west). HiWORDFILE~PLANN[NGASTAFFRPI4nemo.drbsup200~-0]3277oaA ood.do~ The first floor plan identifies nine (9) tenant spaces ranging in size from 1,200 to 3,650 square feet in area. Stairs would be located at the south and north ends of the building with an elevator near Los Flores Boulevard. The second floor plan is strictly for parking providing 79 stalls. Residential parking totals 48 stalls or 2.5 per unit. The third floor plan identifies nineteen two-bedroom condominiums totaling 1,280 square feet each with an open landscaped courtyard in the center. The fourth floor plan illustrates the condominiums around the perimeter of the open courtyard below. The elevations depict the Spanish Mediterranean architecture consisting of stucco siding, Endicott brick, fabric awnings, Sternberg lighting fixtures and a variety of colors. Staff will provide athree-dimensional color rendering and a materials and color sample board. Landscaping plans and provided for the first and third floors provide an attractive mix of tress, shrubbery and ground cover. The applicant will be present to provide an overview of the project and answer questions. Attachments: Location Map Plans (Site, Floors, Elevations, Landscaping) H:\WORDFIL6\PLANNING\STAFFRP'Miemo.d~b.cop2007-07.7211 oakwood.dotz Ownership Map 300' Site: Long Beacl'i Blvd /Los Flores Blvd/Oakwood Ave Lynwood APN: 6170-039-034, 035,036,017 ~ ~. J k .. m _,.__. ~m BoP .~ _. <. 1\ ~ 0 - £Flf~p~A ~"°~M MVIt ~.. // Z4 M N O j $ 2l 3 4 _ $2 $ 00 . / BOSBn .r h / S, / $04 O 9s / _ a °A}! zz ' 3 ml 4s 4> ' ~ o ~s ~ K ? ~ .+°rfl O`~ I ( 2~ ° 0 / 5 / ab 3 . 46 n r~ o ss 44 ^ q ~~ b !' . 9650 N :.. 434 i) v as ~ 56 ' /z Por ~ 22 0 ~ O r° fi£ ~/ ~ ~ : ° re° ~p2 q ( 575.96', ~~ O I 9p sro~~ OR \S0 O O9 sy I r 1 ° ~ L°169;~.L6 , ~a (~ P( O M 0 I / l 25 / ,> cr 9 ~0° ~ ~ ~ )Sa. U ~ 2~2 r)°' ~ ~ 4 /°aw ~ I _ ld ~s 2 u s Q B95° 2B 0 ~ 3S /j 1. ~, s~ N °s O / 2 ~ .I I 6293p 30 i~ aN so W F ~ e. ~ p~ ~ 15 /5~ f IBC ~~3 49 ~ r `Y 9.5)° !. 3 ° 8 ( a 3$ V ti , yr~ is .oo.o l _ .~ v,. ' F ( . ~ s Q ^ rJ. )fa_° 0 Z 9950 o ' ~. 515°36' { 037 h Q N ~ a° es ~ z)29 h°\ a0 $O Por o~ SO lra srz 4// ei ~ a ~ Gr j ~ 9 /60 /Q / Hd 'r / ~ , ~ ~ 0 3 ]5'36'R m ?zra' 3O / 4 I ' `OS 1 .. PO6 ~I 9~ F ~ 1a /356Pe) ~~ 66/2 / ( I 9° / O .. ~ b so ti~~eS/ tiBl~V,t~ ~ ~ s ~' '~ ' LOS°FLOREIS, s ~ > Ili 1 5 2 ~ 0 t ,.72e 0 a /P 5a zs /i+.s° as ' w alai r 3/ OC F ~ 293 I SflB4O`F L64; ~ s.re-Iv 3 O N 0 ~ 23 ' Q 3{ 6O- y s-3 H J ' ~ 09Po6 _ J B9.s° 3343,. O h nlO O0 ~)s°` ( , s so ~ . ,n ~. ~ hry i,, (OOy x ~~ 5. J5. 36rW'~ W 6 / . 81 h N ( ~ ' /zn '97 ~ ° l~ q ,~ ~b ~ 2 ° "~~ ° \ nr SITE ~ I~ ~ / F ti 36 0 $44434 O ~ 2' y ~ ad 96 -~ ~ l 2 n F 33 y° s e's4~ ~ 0 3 O r /aa 4( O O Q OO ~ 1 V t)fl93 ~ ~ 8 /a. B '~ Vx qh~ 1p2 5 (O O. o 3a 9S i N/,~ ~O ''.. q ' z. ~' ' ' \ a ~ 3 ( ~ v ~+ N t ~ e s s. zs~ass5 ' ~ : 04 e ' 15 /l9 y.za 84 h P/ Yw 53- 9 AVE,r° s° Og qq ., ,5a o AK~.y °~ zp ° ~ $ z/s` sp 4 O .~.~ 1 36 AVE.°a-9 5,\SO O ~ Wl!ll 95' 5 49 4 3 O \~ b l40 z5.e°°~9 II~a NNi 3f O I O Po6 . r /3 d g 47 t W l .6 h ~ 9i si y~ 48 4 35.2 ~ 93 25 CJ 'h M ~ ~ I o 13B ap ! ~ n.• ~ ( ~ Z ~ ~1/Q O 6/Ii. Ollb.. - M /43 !I \ / 0 ' 4 In / N 1317 /v. > ' 87 I . ~~. p /9 /B 1I /44.. Z 92 s( `.! ~0 (0g B .. 3j 9 \ 2 ~ ~ ~ 1 6 ` o Par I ~ ~ g, . 07 8 as U 10 a J F /.s I ::. o . _ 4 35 36 O i ' 3°es '~~ 9/?5 Jo ~ 9' I . ~ 92 ~ , W M I 96 BgBrsa " 54 . . o . 3•9 3 • • 1 0 '~49J 99 P5 ~ Y O ., pK ' H ill g~ll2'` ~11Ci1~ sfo sA ~ ` v an ! x114. 115 °5a ~ Jo J5.16 75°36 ~ 90 0 ~ Par. ~ y 1 J , >, a~~ a9s l R 935 -' 5 - g `~- PER~A~-1 ' - x,5.9 o i ! 1 ' 1 ~- 1 o' M ~ cxss c.e /6e/ -- °P °~-~' IMPERIAL ` u "~'° __ __ zs ~'- - ~ _ u~ ias' 136 h/2 Wrz Ja ~ - v ~ 2e ~.. a ~~.,~ "~11 ~ . ' -W_ )J IetM 135 .. F- .~~.°. )rr.° ~~ 1 ri 3 4] 46 _.... w - ~ - e~ y~e7 ~ P -, 'J WI e p.r ' '°°r2 x I ~/a 0 - 119 IIB Z ~ Q - _ 31 s.i 3g 39 q02/ 4.. 212 ~o ~ ~ 12r hr ~1 1~ 1 ~ 2s J 1' = 1 QIOzi ~ ,t'tiV se jy / ... 1 . ~ ~ #ea o ,.or A M Mannin6 Sr~rvicc>! n2-25R 3/07- AGENDA ITEM 9 CUP N0. 2007-08 DATE: April 25, 2007 TO: Honorable Members of the Design Review Board FROM: Grant Taylor, Director of Development Services SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-08 12726 Waldorf Drive APN 6186-022-023 Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Board consider the design, provide recommendations and support the project to the Lynwood Planning Commission. Background: The applicant, Maria Sandoval, is requesting approval to construct two (2) detached residences, one-story in height with three attached two-car garages. The existing residence at the front of the property would remain. The subject property totals 9,850 square feet in area and is located at 12726 Waldorf Drive on the east side of Waldorf Drive between Olanda Street and McMillan Street in the R-3 (Multiple-Family Residential) zone. Discussion & Analysis: The site plan identifies atwenty-five foot (25~ front yard setback, the existing one-story residence, and two detached one-story residences. The middle residence would have two attached two car garages and the rear residence would have an attached two-car garage. An open guest parking stall is provided. The existing 12'-6"driveway on the south end of the property would remain. The floor plans identify residences that total 1,150 and 1,079 square feet in area providing three bedrooms and two bathrooms. The two-car garages range in size from 417 to 441 square feet. The elevations identify stucco siding, composition asphalt roofs with decorative door and window schedules. The siding will be painted Miami Peach (cream), the trim Alamo (beige) and the roof shingles desert tan. Staff will provide athree-dimensional color rendering will color samples. The applicant will be present to review the project and answer questions. Attachments: Plans (Site, Floors, Elevations) H:AWORDFILEIPLANNINGAS'fAFPKPllmemo.drbJ 2726waldoRdoc ~P/T~/C~.f ~E 0 Ieze) 35oaea omrEasniv iaccuaaNrs ust w~uius ours - urio use-aaNs u W ~GCr~L colACLw+cE cONStxnpc e a p yC Y PROJECT INFORMATION 12726 WALDORF DR. LYNWOOD, CA. 07-171 ^N~A O o®~ sT ~ ~[ y. 8 A Q /y b 4~V l SCALE 1" = 2 tip, ~©~ va <y N .° q0. ~ Oa o©~ _ N" $ ~ .~ 0y4 ~ Q ~~ > y0 C ~ b Oygo F, q0 Oq 4 O ~1 ~94v u yy / ST ~~ ~A '~C04 : O ti~ 6 N y 40 ~ a O oOu .~'!C~ ~S+ S CANOq Fk ea ~ k C ' ~ eo k `I STp d er~ro 8 2n ~ u e $ Jac ~i 0 o' i