HomeMy Public PortalAbout2-401 Annual Report 2014___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10183 Truckee Airport Road, Truckee, CA 96161-3306
www.townoftruckee.com
Administration: 530-582-7700 / Fax: 530-582-7710 / email: truckee@townoftruckee.com
Community Development: 530-582-7820 / Fax: 530-582-7889 / email: cdd@townoftruckee.com
Animal Services/Vehicle Abatement: 530-582-7830 / Fax: 530-582-7889 / email: animalservices@townoftruckee.com
Police Department: 530-550-2328 / Fax: 530-550-2326 / email: policedepartment@townoftruckee.com
Printed on recycled paper.
Town Council
Patrick Flora, Mayor
Alicia Barr, Vice Mayor
Dr. Mark Brown D.C., Council Member
Joan deRyk Jones, Council Member
Carolyn Wallace Dee, Council Member
Department Heads
Tony Lashbrook, Town Manager
Andy Morris, Town Attorney
Adam McGill, Chief of Police
John McLaughlin, Community Development Director
Kim Szczurek, Administrative Services Director
Judy Price, Town Clerk
Alex Terrazas, Assistant Town Manager
Daniel Wilkins, Public Works Director/Town Engineer
December 29, 2014
Tobi Tyler
Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board
2501 Lake Tahoe Boulevard
South Lake Tahoe, California 96150
Re: Brockway Road Trail Project, Truckee, California
Annual Report 2014 for 401 Permit R6T‐2013‐0021
Dear Ms. Tyler:
The Town of Truckee was issued a 401 Water Quality Certification for the Brockway Road Trail
Project, R6T‐2013‐0021. As part of the permit requirements, an Initial Report of Construction was
submitted to Lahontan by December 31, 2013. The project is a ½‐mile paved pedestrian and bike
trail that is built along the north side of Brockway Road between the Truckee River Regional Park
and “The Rock” commercial complex. The project impacted 0.035 acres of wetlands. In order to
mitigate the wetland impacts of the new trail, the project installed two new areas of wetlands for a
total mitigated area of 0.064 Acres.
One of the mitigation measures was the removal of an existing culvert along the wetland ditch.
Removing the 35 foot long culvert re‐established 0.008 acre of wetlands in the ditch and prevents
vehicles from entering the interior of the property where wetlands and Plumas ivesia (a rare plant)
occur. This further protects the existing 0.5 acres of seasonal wetland at the site. The Town did
authorize a field change to the erosion control in this area for installation of biodegradable mats by
North American Green SC150BN on the banks of the channel above the water line to further prevent
erosion into the stream and increase the re‐vegetation success. The area was hydroseeded prior to
mat installation. Sedge plugs were replanted along the bottom of the channel to promote faster re‐
vegetation of this area.
The second area of mitigation involved removal of a pile of old dredged material adjacent to the
wetland channel and excavating approximately 2 feet below native grade in this area. Surface
vegetation was not able to be salvaged for replanting in the excavation due to the sparse existing
vegetation. The area was re‐vegetated with the wetland seed mix. This area establishes 0.056 acres
of wetland within the wet meadow that was previously degraded.
Page 2
We would also like to note that in addition to mitigating the wetland impacts on site to the
recommended ratio of 1.83:1, the Town also provided compensation per the Army Corp of
Engineers 404 Nationwide Permit in the amount of $6,675 ($150,000 per acre x 0.0445 acres). This
amount is earmarked for future mitigation in the Hydrologic Unit Code #16050102, Truckee,
California.
Post Construction Maintenance of Wetlands
The contract with the construction contractor included maintenance of the wetlands for 1 year post
construction. As part of the maintenance requirements in the construction contract, the site was
evaluated in July 2014 to monitor the progress of the wetlands and make improvements as needed.
The Town and the contractor met on site on July 3, 2014. Western Botanical Services, Inc. prepared
a technical memo for the contractor that summarized their findings of the wetland progress, dated
June 20, 2014. In general, the areas that were seeded were not germinating as well as anticipated.
Plugs in the wetland ditch were healthy and doing well, but additional plugs were recommended to
improve the coverage criteria required for the wetlands. The technical memo is attached to this
report. Based on this meeting and the technical memo, work to improve the wetland was performed
by the contractor from July to October 14, 2014. Due to the continued work on the wetlands, the
Town planned to have a botanist evaluate the area as late as possible in order to ensure the new
plugs were established.
Work performed by the contractor between completion of construction in October 2013 through
the wetland maintenance period through 2014 included the following:
Seeding and watering the banks of the wetland ditch with additional Revegetation seed mix
(July 28, 2014).
Seeding and watering the banks of the wetland basin with additional Revegetation seed mix
(July 28, 2014)
Added additional plugs to the wetland ditch July 15, 2014.
Planting the wetland basin with approximately 300 plugs. After planting plugs in the
wetland basin September 23, 2014, the basin regularly filled up with water, as the holes
allowed the high groundwater in the area to percolate up into the basin. Water was
observed in the basin throughout the remaining fall months. Additional plugs were planted
October 14, 2014.
Removal of invasive weeds
Increased watering
Since the meeting with the contractor in July, the wetlands have shown improved progress. Plants
have germinated on the banks and the plugs that were planted in 2013 and in July 2014 are healthy.
It is too soon to determine the health of the plugs planted in September and October in the wetland
basin as within 6 weeks of the final planting, the basin has been filled with water.
Annual Report Modification
Per our conversation last week with Tobi Tyler, we are requesting a modification to the permit
requirement described under Additional Conditions Item 3 for this year. The permit requires
monitoring of the success in restoring water quality, floodplain function, and biological resources
relative to the wet meadow creation. A professional evaluated the site in June to review progress.
Work was performed through the rest of the summer and fall to improve the wetlands per the
recommendations. Since the completion of the work, we were not able to evaluate the success a
second time as the wetland basin has been full of water due to the wet December this year (photos
Page 3
attached). This has made evaluating the plant success criteria in the basin difficult as the plants
cannot be seen. Therefore, we are submitting the annual report, but will follow up with a technical
report from a qualified professional by May 31, 2015 regarding the plant establishment success and
floodplain function as described in the permit.
Attached to this letter, please find additional information including the technical memo from
Western Botanical Services, Inc. as well as progress photos of the site comparing post construction
completion in October 2013 to progress photos through 2014.
If you have any questions regarding this project or need additional information, please contact me
at 530‐582‐2938.
Sincerely,
Jessica Thompson,
Senior Engineer
Attachments:
Western Botanical Service, Inc. Technical Memo dated June 20, 2014
Post Construction through 1 year Maintenance Period Photos
WESTERN BOTANICAL SERVICES, INC.
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
To: Claudia Chambers, Kelley Erosion Control
Kym Kelley, Kelley Erosion Control
From: Julie Etra, Western Botanical Services, Inc.
Date: June 20, 2014
Re: Brockway Road Trail Project observations of revegetation and recommendations
1. Upland hydroseeding. There has been little germination. Some of the hydroseeding was
done over base rock and success of seeding is unlikely. There is also evidence of
pedestrian disturbance (bike tracks) of hydroseeded slopes. The sites were weedy but
no erosion was noted. There is no Performance Criteria for these areas. I recommend
no action.
2. Access roads to pond (Photo 1, 2). It is presumed that this area has a performance
criteria of 60% cover. Based on adjacent vegetation, 30% +/- is more realistic. The
segment of the road to the pond is better-vegetated (Photo 1) than the segment directly
off of the bike path (Photo 2), but neither meets the performance criteria. Two of the
three species in the wetland seed mix typically have very poor rates of germination due
to internal dormancy mechanisms. If re-seeding is to take place I recommend obtaining
baseline data for the adjacent reference site to develop realistic goals and using the
Revegetation Seed Mix listed below (also for the banks of the ditch).
3. Pond (Photo 3). There was no germination in the pond, not surprising given site
conditions and the nature of the seeds in the mix. Establishing wetland vegetation would
require planting of plugs such as Nebraska sedge and Baltic rush in the bottom and
maintaining saturated conditions until they become established. The slopes could be
hydroseeded with the Revegetation Seed Mix.
4. Ditch (Photo 4). The salvaged and transplanted wetland plugs in the channel are doing
well. The specification required 12 plants; size was not specified. To achieve 60% cover
I recommend planting an additional 30 plugs. The banks of the ditch can be reseeded
with Revegetation Seed Mix (Table 1).
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions.
Technical Memorandum Page 2
Table 1. Revegetation Seed Mix
Botanical Name Common Name/Variety
PLS
lbs./acre
Achillea millefolium Yarrow 0.20
Achnatherum occidentalis Western needlegrass 1.00
Artemisia tridentata ssp
vaseyana Mtn. sagebrush 1.00
Bromus carintaus California brome 3.00
Elymus elymoides Blue wildrye ‘Stanislaus’ 3.00
Elymus trachycaulus Slender wheatgrass, ‘Pryor’ 4.00
Eriogonum umbellatum Sulfur buckwheat 2.00
Lupinus lepidus Pacific lupine 3.00
Poa secunda Sandberg bluegrass 3.00
Wyethia mollis Mule’s ears 0.50
Total 20.70
Photo 1. Access Road to Pond Photo 2. Access Road from Bike Trail
Photo 3. Wetland Mitigation Pond Photo 4. Ditch
Post Co
Wetland
October 1
June 20, 2
onstructi
d Ditch Pro
17, 2013 Wet
2014
ion throu
ogress Pho
land Ditch Po
ugh 1 yea
otos
ost Constructi
r Mainte
on
nance Peeriod Phootos
July 15, 2014‐ Additional plugs and seeding added
December 12, 2014
Wetlan
October 1
October 1
nd Basin P
17, 2013 Wet
17, 2013 Wet
Progress
land Basin loo
land Basin loo
Photos
oking northw
oking south‐P
west‐Post Con
Post Construc
struction
ction
June 23, 2
Septembe
2014
er 23, 2014‐First batch of pplugs looking
east
September 23, 2014‐First batch of plugs looking north
October 7, 2014
December 12, 2014