The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My Public Portal About2021-10-12 packetNOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING AND TENTATIVE AGENDA' City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission Tuesday, October 12, 2021- 6:00 p.m. City Council Chambers- John G. Christy Municipal Building -320 E. McCarty Street Virtual Option-WebEx Click Here to Join Virtually Password: 1234 Join by Phone: +14043971516 US Toll Access Code: 2484 815 5514 TENTATIVE AGENDA 1. Introductions and Roll Call 2. Procedural Matters • Determination of quorum • Call for cases • Receive and review requests for continuance • Receive requests for reordering the agenda • Format of hearing • List of exhibits 3. Adoption of Agenda (as printed or reordered) 4. Approval of September 14, 2021 Regular Meeting Minutes 5. Demolition Review -Under 100 Years Old a. 623 Waverly Street 6. New Business 7. Old Business 8. Other Business a. Historic Preservation Code Revision Committee Update b. Historic Preservation Fund Grants i. Design Guidelines ii. West Main Street Phase III: Jefferson Heights; Wolffs; Carlins Addition; and High Point Place C. Preservation Month -May 2022 9. Dates to Remember a. Next Regular Meeting Date, November 9, 2021 10. Adjournment Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. Please call 573-634-6410 for information regarding agenda items City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission Minutes Regular Meeting — Tuesday, September 14, 2021 Council Chambers — John G. Christy Municipal Building 320 E. McCarty Street/Virtual WebEx Meeting Commission Members Present Donna Deetz, Chairperson Tiffany Patterson Michael Berendzen Alan Wheat, Vice Chairperson Brad Schaefer Steven Hoffman (virtual) Gail Jones Commission Members Absent Gregory Bemboom Council Liaison Present Laura Ward Staff Present Rachel Senzee, Neighborhood Services Supervisor Karlie Reinkemeyer, Neighborhood Services Specialist Guests Present Michael Shine, News Tribune Scott Spencer, City Councilman Call to Order Ms. Deetz called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Attendance Record 8of8 7of8 8of8 7of8 7of8 6of8 6of8 Attendance Record 4of8 Adoption of Agenda Mr. Wheat moved and Ms. Patterson seconded to adopt the agenda as written. The motion passed unanimously. Approval of Regular Meeting Minutes Mr. Berendzen moved and Ms. Patterson seconded to approve the minutes from the August 10, 2021, Regular Meeting as written. The motion passed unanimously. Communications Received A. National Register Nomination -Frank Miller Historic District Ms. Senzee stated that the City received one National Register nomination from the State Historic Preservation Office. The nomination was for the Frank Miller Historic District (1427, 1431, and 1503 Green Berry Road). Ms. Senzee explained that since the City of Jefferson is a Certified Local Government it is appropriate for the Historic Preservation Commission to comment on whether or not to approve the nominations. Ms. Senzee explained that the Historic Preservation Commission had the option to fill out the report form which would confirm that the commission agreed that Frank Miller Historic District met the criteria of significance because the properties embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or represents a work of a master, or possess high artistic values. Mr. Wheat moved and Ms. Patterson seconded that the commission recommends that the property is significant, retains integrity, and is eligible for the National Register. The motion passed unanimously. Now Riicinacc A. Ordinance 16154 Electronic Meetings Ms. Senzee explained City Council adopted this ordinance regarding the rules for virtual meetings. She explained that in order to establish a quorum and for voting commissioners online must have their video turned on and have their faces visible. Ms. Senzee stated that this is the procedure that has been established for holding virtual meetings and in-person meetings at the same time. nlrl Riicinacc A. Historic Preservation Fund Grant -Open Ms. Senzee explained that the City has received three of the four Historic Preservation Fund grants. The grants include surveying the West Main Street; Lower Jefferson and Waterworks Complex, resurveying the Historic East and hiring a consultant to produce a Historic Context for Jefferson City. Ms. Senzee explained that the actual activities of these grants could start this winter or in the spring of 2022. Ms. Senzee stated that the Historic Preservation Fund Grant opportunity is now open. Ms. Senzee stated that two formal resolutions regarding the Historic Preservation Fund Grant opportunity have been provided in the packet. Resolution 2021-03 is for a project to hire a consultant to produce Design Guidelines. This grant would provide $50,000 and the City would provide a 40% match. Mr. Berendzen moved and Mr. Wheat seconded to approve Resolution 2021-03. The motion passed unanimously. Ms. Senzee stated that at the last meeting she asked commissioners for their thoughts on other projects. She said that the City could continue to survey the West Main area or survey a commercial area. Ms. Deetz inquired about how big an area needs to be for a commercial building National Register listing. Ms. Deetz pointed out that the 600 block of E. High and the Ecco Lounge area is not listed on the National Register and these locations could be potential historic preservation fund grant projects. Ms. Senzee stated that more survey work could be conducted near the West Main; Lower Jefferson, and Waterworks Complex or look at some of the commercial areas of the City. Ms. Senzee stated that Resolution 2021-04 is for continuing survey work in the West Main Street area. This grant would provide $23,000 and the City would provide a 40% match. Mr. Wheat motioned and Ms. Patterson seconded to approve Resolution 2021-01. The motion passed unanimously. Ms. Senzee asked commissioners to have ideas for another project in case there is another round of historic preservation funding that the City could pursue. Other Business A. Historic Preservation Code Revision Committee Update Mr. Schaefer and Ms. Senzee gave a summary of the last Historic Preservation Code Revision Committee meeting. Mr. Schaefer explained that there was discussion about the 75% of property owners' signatures required to create a local historic district. Ms. Senzee explained that the committee discussed replacing the 75% rule with a public hearing similar to a planning and zoning case. Ms. Senzee stated that the committee had a conversation about the Foot District. The Foot District is not codified and has no land -use restrictions. It is a historic district by proclamation. Ms. Senzee stated that there is a question about what the City should do with the Foot District and how to preserve history and places that are no longer present. Ms. Senzee said that there is an archaeological component that could be pursued. Ms. Senzee stated that a cultural historic district or an honorary historic that is codified may be a viable option in keeping the preservation of its history alive. B. Paul Bruhn Historic Revitalization Grant Ms. Senzee stated that the grant is designed to stimulate historic preservation in an area that needs help. This grant can fund construction projects. When applying for the grant, City staff utilized the exterior structural survey to identify buildings that need to be addressed. Ms. Senzee explained that 59% of the buildings surveyed had structural issues identified. Ms. Senzee stated that Jefferson City is one of eleven recipients in the country to receive this grant. Ms. Senzee stated that the application process may potentially begin in 9-10 months. C. Preservation Month- May 2022 Ms. Deetz recommended waiting to find out what the Missouri Preservation Conference is planning to do before the Historic Preservation Commission plans activities Dates to Remember A. Next Regular Meeting Date -October 12, 2021 Adjournment Ms. Patterson moved and Mr. Berendzen seconded to adjourn the meeting at 7:09 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. City of Jefferson Department of Planning & Protective Services 320 E. McCarty St ScP 15 2021 Jefferson City, MO 65101 Phone: 573-634-6410 �NN--Li tk icolanning@ieffcitvmo.org P1,:-.:,CTfVE: SERVIC-S www. ieffersoncitvmo.eov APPLICATION FOR DEMOLITION REVIEW/CLEARANCE TO THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION�� glal/val In accordance with Section 8-43 of the City Code l+ 1. The undersigned hereby request(s) the following: Y- 3730 ® Demolition Review (Application fee $53.00) - For properties that meet the following criteria: • Structure(s) age 50 - 99 years old; or • Structure(s) listed on the National Register of Historic Places; or • Structure(s) designated as a Local Landmark. ❑ Demolition Clearance (Application fee $105.00) - For properties that meet the following criteria: • Structure(s) age 100+ years old; or • Structure located within local historic district. 2. The application is filed for the following described real estate: A. Street address: .113 LJCiyeil0, 'JrA 20- pf-sr " Cr $fi zyc0 B. Age of structure: A�A /93 S i C. Number of structures to be demolished: @At- D. Historic name of structure (if any): E. Historical use: F. Most recent use: 3. Digital photos are required to be submitted electronically as part of the application. Photos must have been taken within the last 90 days of all exterior sides, interior rooms and stairwells. Photographs must show all areas and characteristics of the structure, not just those areas in disrepair. If multiple structures or addresses, the photos must be labeled to distinguish between structures. Photos submitted via ❑USB Drive ❑CD ❑Email (Icplanning@ieffcitymo.org) ❑Other 4. Are there architectural features and/or historic fixtures worthy of preservation? ❑ Yes Ja No If so, please explain any plans to preserve such features/fixtures: Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. Review Criteria: Response to Review Criteria as identified in 8-43 F of the Code. Check any that applies to the real estate: 1. To the best of your knowledge, is the structure a notable structure with respect to historic value by reason of: a. Its association with event(s) that significantly contributed to the broad patterns of the history or architectural heritage of the city, county, state or nation. ❑ Yes M No b. Its association with the life or lives of a person(s) significant in the history of the city, county, state or nation. ❑ Yes Q No c. Its embodiment of distinctive characteristics of a type, design, period or method of construction. ❑ Yes til No d. Represents the work of a master designer or architect or possesses high architectural value. ❑ Yes M No e. Exemplifies the cultural, political, economic, social or historic heritage of the city. ❑ Yes 21 No f. Contains elements of design, detail, material or craftsmanship which represent a significant construction innovation. ❑ Yes Ig.No g. It is part of or related to a square, park or other distinctive area that was or should be developed or preserved according to a plan based on a historic or architectural motif. ❑ Yes ® No h. It is an established and familiar visual feature of a neighborhood or of the entire community. ❑Yes RI No L It has yielded, or is likely to yield archeological artifacts and/or information. ❑ Yes ® No 2. To the best of your knowledge, is the structure a notable structure with respect to its demolition being detrimental to: a. The visual or spatial relationships to designated landmarks, National Register Sites, or the streetscape of a local historic district or National Register District. ❑ Yes A No 3. b. The architectural, cultural, historic or contextual character of property designated as a local historic landmark, local historic district, or building or area listed on the National Register of Historic Places. ❑ Yes M No If answering "Yes" to Question 1 and/or 2 above, provide statement addressing why the property cannot be rehabilitated or restored with reasonable economical return. Attach additional pages if necessary. CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that I am the owner of the named property, or that the requested Demolition Review/Clearance is authorized by the owner of record and I have been authorized by the owner to make this application as his/her agent. Signature:Date: 2/ Phone: S%3"ZS%-AGZ Printed Name: Atc4GY f RI-29e-rl— Email: /nr%K.®G414kc oLer1. ca,-- Please aMPlease check: liff Property Owne ❑Authorized Agent ❑Licensed Contractor ❑ Other DEMOLITION REVIEW 623 WAVERLY STREET i IANkr p n. k jat� j t i F� i T� air � .r _ r r too X 31 y i Demolition Application — 623 Waverly Street Page 2 Historic Preservation Commission MidMOGIS N, 04M, 523 WAVERL .. Layers 1.fi5 ac y� R`7J s raw Q gm1.024 ac m. a 020 ■ 'e`024 ac Y 0 5 ac Q 024. A _ 8 ac 0 0 0.15 !_ Mae e- "g• Q.7 . .wase 0 1 0.15 i4 011 ac a 9 0.15 ac., A , 0.15 0. ac, 8 0.1fic la ■ h 1 ac ■ � a oil ac a" a 9,1s ac � ' `b�az ac 9 Q � z m 9.1sac 0.58.e - 192 .50a192 ac STAFF REPORT HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION — CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI October 12, 2021 Demolition Application. Application for demolition of one residential structure located at 623 Waverly Street. NATURE OF REQUEST The purpose of the request is to demolish a single-family residential structure located at 623 Waverly Street. According to MidMOGIS the structure located at 623 Waverly Street was constructed in 1935. STAFF ANALYSIS Historic Preservation Review Y N Comments e o s Property listed on the National Register? X See map on pg. 2 of this document. Property awarded Landmark Desienation? X Is the property character, interest, or value as part of the X These properties are not individually listed on development, heritage or cultural characteristics of the community, the National Register, local landmark or local county, state or nation? historic district. Is the property location a site of a significant local, county, state or X No known significant events have transpired national event? on the properties. Is the property identification with a person or persons who X significantly contributed to the development of the community, county, state or nation? Is the property embodiment of distinguishing characteristics of an archi X Reconnaissance or intensive level of survey has not been completed for this area of town. style valuable for the study of a period, type, method of construction or indigenous materials? Is the property identified as a work of a master builder, designer, X Information on designer or architect is architect, or landscape architect whose individual work has influenced unknown. the development of the community, county, state or nation? Is the property embodiment of elements of design, detailing, X These properties are not architecturally materials, or craftsmanship that render it architecturally significant? significant. Is the property unique location or singular physical characteristics that X make it an established or familiar visual feature? Is the property character as a particularly fine or unique example of a X utilitarian structure, including, but not limited to, farmhouses, gas stations, or other commercial structures, with a high level of integrity or architectural significance? STAFF RECOMMENDATION In reviewing Section 8-44 C. Criteria for Nomination (as outlined above), and the structure does not appear to hold sufficient historical significance in terms of heritage, cultural or architecturally. 623 Waverly Street was constructed in 1935 and utilized as a residential structure. FORM OF MOTION Motion that the Demolition Review Application for 623 Waverly Street is recommended for approval by this commission. Historic Preservation Commission 623 Waverly Street Motion: Aaarove the Demolition Review Meeting Date: October 12, 2021 ication for 623 Waverlv Street I certify the foregoing is a correct record of the Commissioners' presence and votes. Donna Deetz Chairperson Attest Karlie Reinkemeyer Eligible to Vote Aye Nay Abstain Present Absent Commissioner Gregory Bemboom Donna Deetz, Chair Steven Hoffman Gail Jones Tiffany Patterson Alan Wheat, Vice Chair Brad Schafer Michael Berendzen Tie Votes: Chair Votes I certify the foregoing is a correct record of the Commissioners' presence and votes. Donna Deetz Chairperson Attest Karlie Reinkemeyer