Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My Public Portal
About
Appendix C_Transportation
APPENDIX C TRANSPORATION TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS 2690 Lake Forest Road, Suite C P.O. Box 5875 Tahoe City, California 96145 (530) 583-4053 FAX: (530) 583-5966 EMAIL: info@lsctahoe.com www.lsctahoe.com MEMORANDUM DATE: May 30, 2008 TO: Denyelle Nishimori, Town of Truckee Lynette Dias & Charity Wagner, RRM Design Group FROM: Gordon Shaw, LSC SUBJECT: Truckee Railyard Trip Generation, Trip Distribution and Parking Generation Analysis The purpose of this memorandum is to present the trip generation analysis, parking generation analysis and trip distribution which LSC will use as the basis for the traffic analysis and parking analysis of the Truckee Railyard Project. We request that you review these assumptions and indicate whether they are acceptable or provide direction on appropriate changes, before we apply them to the ongoing analysis. TRIP GENERATION "Trip generation analysis" is the process by which transportation analysts identify the number of vehicle -trips that a specific proposed land use plan will add to local roadways. For a simple proposal (such as a single land use) this can be a relatively straightforward process of applying trip generation rates (the number of trips per unit of land use) observed at similar existing developments, and then potentially adjusting for specific local characteristics. For the Truckee Railyard project, however, the variety of mixed uses proposed to be constructed, its location within the historic downtown Truckee area, and the need to estimate traffic volumes on internal roadways requires a more complex trip generation analysis. The traffic engineering profession has developed an extensive database regarding the traffic generated by common land use types, as documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (7th Edition). This document is typically used as the basis for traffic analyses in the Town of Truckee. The trip generation associated with the Truckee Railyard Project was primarily based upon the Truckee Railyard Trip/Parking Generation Page 2 May 30, 2008 ITE trip rates, modified as discussed below to reflect various factors that tend to reduce traffic generation for the project. In addition, some assumptions regarding the use of these rates are further detailed below. The project is proposed to be developed in several phases. The traffic and parking analysis has been scoped to focus on two development levels: the conclusion of Phase 1 (including both Phase 1A and Phase 1B) and the conclusion of full development. A separate trip generation and parking analysis has been provided for each development block in order to accurately reflect pedestrian and bicycle trips (which will tend to increase between Phase I and buildout as a higher number of trip attractions are developed within convenient walk/bike travel distance). Phase 1- Development Blocks ❑ Downtown Extension Hotel Block ❑ Downtown Extension Theater Block Phase 2 - Development Blocks ❑ Downtown Extension Hotel Block ❑ Downtown Extension Bounded by Donner Pass Road (realigned), Donner Pass Road Extension, B Street, and Church Street Extension (including the Phase 1 Theater Block) ❑ Downtown Extension North of Church Street Extension (including partial Tahoe Truckee Lumber existing parcel) ❑ Heritage Industrial District ❑ Trout Creek District ❑ Balloon Track Area This analysis is based on the land use quantities identified in the Truckee Railyard Master Plan: Notice of Preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Report (Town of Truckee). It is also necessary to identify a number of planning assumptions for this analysis: • Residential units are assumed to be 100 percent primary residents (i.e., full-time occupants rather than second home owners). • Lodging is assumed to be 100 percent occupied during the period of analysis. Truckee Railyard Trip/Parking Generation Page 3 May 30, 2008 • Live/Work units are assumed to be residential units containing home offices, and, therefore, are not expected to generate any significant amount of external office/client related trips. • Work/Live units are assumed to generate both residential and office/retail type of trips. These units are assumed to be 25 percent owner or renter occupied. In the other 75 percent of Work/Live units, the residential and commercial portions of the unit are independently occupied (i.e. there are tenants in one or both portions). • In owner/renter-occupied Work/Live units, 20 percent of trips are assumed to be work -related, and thus internal. • Each Work/Live unit is analyzed as one multifamily residential unit plus 1,000 square feet of commercial space. In the Downtown Extension District, 40 percent of Work/Live units are assumed to contain retail space and 60percent are assumed to contain office space. In the Industrial Heritage District, all Work/Live units are assumed to contain office space. • All retail not otherwise designated is considered specialty retail, as defined by the ITE Trip Generation Manual (7th Edition). • All office is considered general office, as defined in the ITE Trip Generation Manual. • Restaurant space is assumed to consist of 20 percent fast-food (no drive -through window), 40 percent high -turnover sit-down restaurant, and 40 percent quality restaurant, as defined in the ITE Trip Generation Manual. • Multifamily units are assumed to consist of 25 percent apartment (rentals) and 75 percent condo (owned). • No reductions are assumed for transit use. • The only use within the relocated balloon track area will be a 5,000 square foot Union Pacific Railroad yard office (not included in the Notice of Preparation land uses), which is evaluated at an office rate. • Tahoe Truckee Lumber (TTL) is assumed to continue to operate in its current location in Phase 1, but is assumed to be relocated out of the vicinity by buildout. The land currently used by TTL not in the railyard area (the north side of the TTL site) will be assumed at buildout to be used for a public utility use that generates no traffic. • The 25 Thousand Square Feet (KSF) of civic use floor area is assumed to consist half of museum space and half of library space. Truckee Railyard Trip/Parking Generation Page 4 May 30, 2008 Base Trip Generation Prior to Application of Reductions The trip generation analysis was conducted by first identifying appropriate "base" trip generation rates, multiplying these rates by the proposed land use quantities associated with the Railyard development proposal, and then applying a series of adjustment factors to reflect the specific characteristics of the project and its location. The base trip generation rates were largely drawn from the extensive data regarding observed trip generation presented in the ITE Trip Generation Manual. As shown in Table A, the assumptions discussed above were applied to the ITE rates to identify appropriate base rates for the specific Railyard land use categories. Several aspects of this table bear comment: • A reduction is applied to the Work/Live units to reflect trips that are avoided as persons both working and living in the same unit do not generate commute trips. Based upon typical observed trip patterns by purpose, it is assumed that 20 percent of all trips associated with the residential portion of the Work/Live units that are occupied by on -site workers are work trips. As this factor applies to 25 percent of all Work/Live units, and as it results in an equal reduction in trips associated with the onsite employment, an overall 10 percent reduction is applied to all units ( 0.20 X 0.25 X 2 ). • Trip generation rates for the museum land use type are not provided in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, and tend to vary depending on the attractiveness of the museum. A literature review was conducted as the basis for identifying an appropriate daily trip generation rate for a museum in the downtown Truckee area: • Data presented in the Donner Memorial State Park Master Plan EIR (California State Parks, 2003) regarding an expanded Emigrant Trail Museum indicates that the existing museum at Donner Memorial State Park generates approximately 37 one-way vehicle -trips per KSF on a busy summer day. • An analysis of a proposed California Natural History Museum on the campus of the California State University at Chico indicated a daily rate of 30 vehicle -trips per KSF (EDAW, 2007). • A study conducted by Bay Area Economics (BAE) in 2003 for a proposed museum at the Old Mint in San Francisco identified that major museum venues in the Bay Area (such as the San Francisco Exploratorium or Steinhart Aquarium) generate on the order of 8 visitors per square foot of museum floor area per year. (Old Mint Preliminary Feasibility Analysis, BAE, 2003). However, the report also states that published sources and BAE interviews with museum directors and experts indicate that a smaller museum, such as would be accommodated by the Old Mint site, would be more likely to support about four visitors per square foot of exhibit space. Factoring for vehicle occupancy and Truckee Railyard Trip/Parking Generation Page 5 May 30, 2008 seasonality, this latter figure equates to a daily trip generation rate of roughly 18 vehicle -trips per day in the peak season . Considered as a whole, this data indicates that a daily rate of 30 vehicle -trips per day for a museum at the Railyard site is appropriate. It is further assumed that 15 percent of daily traffic enters or exits during the PM peak hour, and that twice as many vehicles are assumed to exit the museum during the PM peak -hour than would enter. In order to estimate the trips generated by the project, the resulting trip rates identified in Table A of the ITE Trip Generation Manual are multiplied by the quantity of each land use. As shown in Table B, the Phase 1 land uses, without consideration for walking, biking, internal, or pass -by trips, are forecast to generate a total of 6,370 one-way vehicle -trips during a summer weekday, 341 of which occur during the PM peak hour (173 entering and 168 exiting). At buildout, as shown in Table C, daily one-way vehicle - trips (excluding consideration of internal, non -auto, or pass -by trips) are forecast to total 17,935, of which 1,385 are forecast to occur in the PM peak -hour (671 entering plus 714 exiting). Internal and Non -Auto Trip Reductions Because this is a mixed -use land development, a significant amount of internal trips would occur. Internal trips within each development block and between the development blocks within the site would also occur. Furthermore, all trips that occur within a development block are assumed to occur as walking (or bicycle) trips, while a high proportion of trips between development blocks would also occur as walking trips. The site's location within convenient walk distance of existing downtown Truckee land uses (commercial, recreational, and residential) also would tend to reduce auto trips, as some (though not all) trips between the Railyard area and existing downtown Truckee land uses would occur by non -auto modes. For existing mixed use developments similar to the proposed Truckee Railyard project, the proportion of trips that remain internal to the project can be significant. As examples, Appendix C of the ITE Trip Generation Manual presents the results of detailed trip generation counts conducted for mixed use projects with similar quantities of residential/lodging, commercial, and office land uses, which indicate that roughly 40 percent of trips do not impact external roadways. No reductions were made for trips made via transit, as the transit service currently provided in the Town of Truckee is relatively limited in scope and frequency and ridership levels are low, and as it is not appropriate to assume a significant increase in such service for purposes of this analysis. The trip generation rates presented in the ITE Trip Generation Manual typically reflect a negligible level of transit use, consistent with the relatively low level found in Truckee. Truckee Railyard Trip/Parking Generation Page 6 May 30, 2008 Non -Auto Internal Trips (Internal Trips Within a Development Block) The proposed Truckee Railyard project consists of five development blocks (plus the relocated Balloon Track area), four of which include mixed -use development. As a result, significant amount of non -auto internal trips within the same block can be assumed between restaurants, retail, office, and residential land uses. As an example, a proportion of the restaurant and retail customers at establishments on the Hotel Block can be expected to consist of hotel guests who simply walk to these destinations, thereby reducing the traffic that would be otherwise generated by the restaurant and retail land uses. An estimate of the percentage of these trips that occur between residential, commercial, and office uses was primarily based upon the methodologies contained in the ITE Trip Generation Manual (2005). It should be noted, however, that the ITE internal capture estimation methodologies do not distinguish between different commercial land uses like restaurant and movie theater and, therefore, do not account for the fact that pedestrian trips and/or bicycle trips are higher between restaurants, retail uses, and movie theaters than between general retail uses. For this reason, adjustments were made to the ITE internal percentages based upon typical observed person -trips between these uses in similar settings. The balance of internal trips between various land use types within each block were then evaluated to identify the proportions that best balance these internal trips. Non -Auto Internal Trips (Non -Auto Trips Between Development Blocks) As the project proposes to build restaurants, retail shops, a movie theater, residential units, and office space on blocks within an easy walk or cycle distance, a significant amount of pedestrian/bicycle trips can be assumed to occur between land use on nearby blocks. To estimate the percentage of these trips that would occur between development blocks, the methodologies contained in the ITE Trip Generation Handbook were used, adjusting to reflect the specific type and configuration of Railyard proposed land uses. Because more nearby land uses within convenient walk/bike distance would be available upon project buildout, the average percent of internal trips between the different land uses differ under Phase 1 and Buildout. Moreover, internal trips would vary by development blocks as the distance between each block and commercial, residential, and office centers varies. For example, pedestrian/bicycle trips would be higher between the Hotel and Theater Blocks compared to between the Hotel Block and Industrial Heritage District, which are about one -quarter mile apart. Similarly, the proportion of pedestrian/bicycle trips between the Hotel Block and the existing downtown Commercial Row area is expected to be greater than the proportion between Commercial Row and the Industrial Heritage area. Due to this, internal trips were assigned between the blocks individually considering the distance between the development blocks, size and type of land uses, and trips generated and received by the land uses. Truckee Railyard Trip/Parking Generation Page 7 May 30, 2008 Resulting Total Vehicle -Trip Generation — At Site Access The base trip generation estimates can be factored by the internal and pedestrian//bike reductions in order to identify the total number of vehicle -trips that would enter/exit the site. (This is typically referred to as the site access trip generation, though in this instance it also includes vehicles parking on -street.) As shown in the central portion of Table B, with Phase 1 development the number of site access one-way vehicle -trips is estimated to equal 4,699 per day, including 254 PM peak -hour trips (129 inbound plus 125 outbound). Comparing these figures with the base trip generation volumes, the reduction in traffic associated with internal and pedestrian/bike trips is estimated to equal 26 percent over the course of the total day or in the PM peak -hour. At buildout (shown in Table C), site access trip generation is estimated to equal 13,139 vehicle -trips per day, and 1,046 in the PM peak -hour (505 inbound plus 541 outbound). This reflects a 27 percent reduction from base generation over the entire day, and 24 percent in the PM peak -hour. Note that these proportions are not directly comparable with the figure for similar mixed -use projects cited above, as they do not include vehicle trips expected to be generated that remain within the railyard site. Trip Generation Reductions Reflecting Pass -By Trips A proportion of the commercial trips would consist of pass -by trips, or trips that are made by drivers that are already on the adjacent roadways prior to the development of the site, which (with the development of the site) can be expected to make intermediate stops at project land uses on the way from an origin to a primary trip destination. Pass - by trips are included in the site driveway movements, but are reflected as reductions in the through volumes passing the site driveway locations and are not included in the forecast of impact of the project on through volumes away from the site driveways. Note that no reductions for pass -by trips are appropriate for residential land uses (including lodging) as this land use is a primary origin/destination of a vehicle -trip. Data regarding appropriate pass -by percentages for various land uses is available in the ITE Trip Generation Handbook. Based upon the typical pass -by percentages presented in this document and considering regional access patterns, the percentage of pass -by trips are estimated to be 36 percent for the grocery store, 20 percent for other retail land uses, 25 percent for restaurants, 15 percent for offices, and 10 percent for the civic uses. All other land uses are assumed to have no pass -by trips. The Work/Live pass -by reduction of 16 percent is computed by factoring the commercial and residential land use pass -by reductions by the proportion of trip generation by use associated with each unit. After adjusting for the above mentioned factors, the impact of the project on traffic volumes on adjacent roadways at Phase I is estimated to equal 4,190 per day, or 224 PM peak -hour trips (114 inbound plus 110 outbound). At buildout, trip generation is estimated to equal 11,012 vehicle -trips per day, with 878 in the PM peak -hour (427 inbound plus 451 outbound) occurring in the PM peak -hour. It may be noted that the number of trips entering and exiting the site are almost equal, suggesting that the mixed Truckee Railyard Trip/Parking Generation Page 8 May 30, 2008 use development in this project provides an effective rough balance in traffic that results in relatively effective use of roadway capacity. Of total daily external trip generation on adjacent roadways at buildout, 51.2 percent is generated by the commercial, office and civic uses, 36.7 percent is generated by the residential uses, 9.1 percent by the theater, and 3.1 percent by the hotel. Trip Generation of Existing Uses To Be Removed It is also necessary to estimate the traffic currently generated by the existing land uses on the site that would be removed. While the existing single family homes in the study parcel will remain and the railroad uses will be relocated on the site, the card lock fueling facility and Truckee Glass uses would be removed as part of the Phase 1 development and the Truckee — Tahoe Lumber Company would be removed by buildout of the project. Table D presents the trip generation estimates associated with these land uses. As there is not a standard trip generation rate for a cardlock fueling facility, the trip generation for this land use is an estimate based upon typical gas station rates reduced to reflect the limit on users of the facility. The net impact of the proposed project can be calculated by subtracting the trip generation of these existing uses that would be removed from the total future trip generation of the proposed uses. For Phase 1, subtracting the 406 existing daily trips on the adjacent streets from the 4,190 trips with the proposed land use indicates that the project would result in a net increase of 3,784 vehicle -trips. At buildout, subtracting the 1,432 trips associated with the existing land uses from the 11,012 trips with the proposed land uses results in a net increase of 9,580 vehicle -trips. PARKING ANALYSIS The purpose of the parking analysis is to evaluate the demand for parking generated by the various elements of the project, assess the potential to reduce parking supply through the shared use of parking, and provide information useful in the development of parking supply strategies. With careful consideration of the individual uses to be accommodated on the site and variation in the need for parking over the day, it is possible to meet all of the parking needs while also minimizing the total amount of parking spaces that must be provided. Base Parking Demand Rates Similar to the trip generation analysis presented above, the basis of the parking analysis is to identify parking demand rates appropriate to the specific setting and land uses of the Railyard project. For commercial uses (retail, office, and restaurant), the Town parking code is applied, and then factored based upon observed parking demand in the downtown Truckee area. Using land use and parking count data provided by the Town, the total parking required for existing downtown land uses under the existing Code was identified. Dividing the maximum observed parking demand by this "code" parking demand yields a ratio which then can be used to factor the standard code parking rate Truckee Railyard Trip/Parking Generation Page 9 May 30, 2008 to identify rates appropriate for the downtown area (including the proposed project). Note that this analysis focuses on a "busy but not peak" parking condition (the observed peak excluding only special events). For residential and lodging uses, LSC conducted a review of rates applied in the downtown core areas of other mountain resort communities, as well as a review of recent observed parking count data. These base parking rates are then used as the basis for a shared parking analysis of the proposed Railyard land uses. Evaluation of Existing Downtown Truckee Commercial Parking The Town of Truckee has adopted standard parking requirement rates for various land uses as part Chapter 18 of the Development Code. Previous counts of peak parking utilization generated in the downtown Truckee area have indicated that the actual parking demand generated by existing land uses are lower than would be required by the Town Code. As the proposed Railyard development would be a mixed -use development (similar to the existing downtown) in the same setting from a perspective of transportation factors, it is appropriate to evaluate this ratio of observed parking utilization to Code parking requirements for retail, restaurant, office and other non - lodging commercial land uses currently existing in the downtown area, and to apply the resulting adjustment factors to appropriate land uses in the proposed Railyard project. Fortunately, the Town's Parking Office conducts monthly parking counts on an hourly basis both on Wednesdays and Saturdays, throughout the year. As shown in Table E, this data was reviewed for a full year. Observed weekday parking demand was found to reach as high as 614 parked vehicles in July, while peak weekend (Saturday) parking demand was found to reach as high as 638 vehicles. These peak parking counts were observed to occur around 1:00 PM on the weekday counts, and 1:00 to 2:00 PM on the weekend counts. Some of the observed parking demand is generated by non-commercial uses, such as the residential, lodging, and Post Office uses. Estimates of the parking demand generated by these uses at the time of peak overall parking demand were made based upon LSC and Town staff observations, the existing land use quantities for these land uses, and previous parking studies. As shown in Table F, subtracting these other parking demand figures results in an estimated commercial demand of 536 vehicles at the weekday peak and 551 at the weekend peak. Next, Town Planning Department staff developed an updated inventory of total actual downtown Truckee land use quantities in the summer of 2007 (at the time of peak observed parking demand). As shown in the bottom portion of Table F, the Town Code parking requirements for each use were then identified. As the period of peak parking demand associated with each individual land use category does not necessarily occur at the observed time of overall peak parking demand, it is necessary to apply factors reflecting both the relative parking demand on the day of week as well as the relative parking demand by the time of day. These factors were drawn from data presented in the Urban Land Institute's Parking Demand (2003). Multiplying the downtown Truckee Truckee Railyard Trip/Parking Generation Page 10 May 30, 2008 land use by the Town Code rates and applying the day -of -week and time -of -day factors for each land use yields the parking demand by land use at the period of overall peak parking demand. Summing over all land uses, the parking demand by Town Code is estimated to equal be 949 vehicles at peak on the weekday, and 858 at peak on the weekend. Dividing the observed peak demand by the peak demand by Code results in a factor of 0.56 at the time of weekday peak demand, and 0.64 at the time of weekend peak demand. The "limiting case" between these two periods is the weekend. In conclusion, existing counts indicate that the existing Town Code parking rates must be factored by 0.64 to match the observed parking demand at the peak time of day on the peak day of the week in the peak month of the year in downtown Truckee (excluding special events). This factor can be reasonably applied to those commercial land use categories currently found in downtown Truckee. Review of Parking Codes in Peer Mountain Resort Communities One basis for identification of appropriate base parking rates for lodging and residential uses in the Railyard is a peer review of parking requirements adopted by other the mountain resort communities. Specifically, the code requirements adopted by Mammoth Lakes, California; Park City, Utah; Vail, Summit County, and Aspen, Colorado; and Jackson, Wyoming were reviewed. Tables G and H present peer hotel and residential parking codes. The Truckee code requirements are also presented in the tables for comparison purposes. In reviewing these "peer" rates, it should be considered that many jurisdictions often simply use rates taken from other jurisdictions rather than develop them based upon any specific local study, and therefore may or may not reflect actual demand when adopted. To the degree that the rates have "stood the test of time" and not been modified due to resulting parking problems, these peer rates generally can be assumed to meet or exceed the actual parking demand. Multifamily Dwelling Units Table G presents the residential parking code peer review for multifamily dwelling units and workforce housing. It is assumed that, other than for units specifically identified as "workforce housing," these rates are applicable to permanently occupied market rate units. Most of the peer communities describe parking codes in the number of spaces required per type of dwelling unit (one -bedroom, two -bedroom etc.), however, Park City, Utah and Vail, Colorado take into account the square footage of the dwelling unit as opposed to the number of bedrooms. For comparison purposes, Park City and Vail's parking requirements are listed under the same dwelling unit type categories as the other communities. Both the City of Aspen and the Town of Vail established separate, less stringent residential off-street parking requirements for "commercial core" or "infill" areas. Aspen even goes a step further and allows developers in certain commercial zones to not provide any off-street parking if the project is part of a mixed use building. Truckee Railyard Trip/Parking Generation Page 11 May 30, 2008 In these cases, it is assumed that sufficient parking will be provided by the developer as part of the overall project. The code applied to the Village at Mammoth (a recently - constructed resort "village" in Mammoth Lakes) is another example of where the code was tailored to a specific area or type of use. Focusing on the requirements for a 1 bedroom unit, the existing Truckee code requirement of 1.875 spaces per unit (including guest parking) is higher than any of the other peer community requirements for core areas. While the Vail code requires 2 spaces per unit outside of their commercial core area, within the commercial core area only 1.4 spaces are required per unit. For 2 bedroom units, the Truckee core requirement of 2.5 spaces per unit is higher than that of the peer communities, with the exception of Placer County's requirements for the North Tahoe community plan areas, which is identical to Truckee's. Hotel Hotel parking requirements of the various peer communities are shown in Table H. As indicated, the Truckee code requirement of 1 space per room plus 0.5 spaces per peak employee (plus any spaces needed for accessory uses) is consistent with the higher end of the peer rates. At the low end, the City of Aspen requires no parking for new lodging rooms within the downtown "infill" area. (It should be noted that this area is also served by a very extensive transit program as well as public parking facilities). Both Aspen (outside of the infill area) and Vail (within their commercial core area) require 0.7 spaces per room. ITE Parking Generation Manual A valuable and relatively up-to-date source of parking demand rates is Parking Generation, 3rd Edition published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) in 2004. This document presents data from a collection of parking demand studies performed across the country for 91 different land uses. Although the majority of data in Parking Generation were derived from suburban settings, it can be used as a starting point to determine the general nature of parking demand for a given land use. Table I presents average and 85th percentile peak period parking demand ratios for lodging and residential land uses. The 85th percentile is defined as the point at which 85 percent of the values fall at or below and 15 percent of the values are above. When available, higher peak Saturday parking demand data was used to reflect the recreational characteristics of Truckee; otherwise, weekday data is shown in Table I. Lodging Data is available regarding three different types of lodging: hotel, motel, and resort hotel. The "resort hotel" category is not considered to be applicable to a project in the Truckee downtown area, as it is defined as a relatively large resort property with multiple inclusive recreational amenities such as a golf course or tennis courts. Focusing on the hotel land use, the average peak period parking demand is 0.91 Truckee Railyard Trip/Parking Generation Page 12 May 30, 2008 vehicles per room and the 85th percentile value is 1.14. Note that these available rates are on a per room basis rather than a per occupied room basis, and therefore reflect some unknown level of unoccupied rooms. The rate per occupied room would be some unknown value higher than those presented in the document. These rates, moreover, were observed on weekdays (when occupancy is typically relatively low). The report indicates that "Three study sites providing both Saturday and weekday parking demand data; Saturday parking demand averaged 40 percent higher than the weekday rates." Residential Two ITE land use categories were deemed appropriate for this study: low/mid rise apartment and condo/townhouse with an average peak period parking demand of 1.20 vehicles per dwelling unit and 1.46 vehicles per dwelling unit, respectively. The 85th percentile parking demand is 1.46 vehicles per dwelling unit for the apartment category and 1.68 vehicles per dwelling unit for the condo/townhouse category. Although the number of bedrooms per condominium or apartment reflected in this data is unknown, the report provides limited information on apartment parking demand by number of bedrooms. For apartment complexes averaging less than 1.5 bedrooms per unit, parking demand rates were 8 percent less than average, while those complexes with 2.0 or more bedrooms per units generated parking demand 13 percent higher than the average for all complexes. Recommended Downtown Truckee Parking Rates Based on the information presented above, the following base parking rates are recommended as applicable to the Railyard parking analysis, as shown in Table J: • For the general retail, restaurant, and office land uses, the observed downtown Truckee parking factor (discussed above) was applied to the base Truckee Code requirements to identify reduced parking demand rates appropriate for downtown Truckee. • The existing Town Code does not include a rate specifically for grocery stores. The observed downtown parking factor is not considered to be applicable to this land use type, as the grocery store can be expected to serve a larger region (particularly if it provides grocery items unique to the Truckee area). In addition, the existing grocery stores in the community have particularly strong peaks in demand, such as at the beginning of busy summer and winter weekends when second home owners stock their residences. Therefore, the 85 percentile value presented in ITE's Parking Generation (6.72 vehicles per thousand square feet of floor area) is recommended. • For the multiplex movie theater, a rate of 0.19 spaces per seat is recommended, based upon the highest observed value reported in Parking Demand for Multiplex Theaters prepared by Portland State University. This rate is less than the average rate presented in ITE's Parking Generation (0.26 spaces per seat), reflecting that not all screens in a multiplex theater are showing a highly popular film simultaneously. Truckee Railyard Trip/Parking Generation Page 13 May 30, 2008 • For the civic and lodging land uses, the existing Town Code requirements are considered to be appropriate. While this lodging rate is higher than those at some of the peer mountain communities, the relatively limited public transit program and the fact that the Truckee/Tahoe region is more of a "drive in" than a "fly in" tourist market indicates that a relatively high parking demand rate is appropriate. • For single family residential units, the existing Town Code of 2 spaces per unit is appropriate. • For the multifamily residential land use (including the live/work units), rates of 1.1 spaces per studio unit 1.35 spaces per one -bedroom unit, 1.65 spaces per two - bedroom unit and 1.95 spaces per three -bedroom unit are recommended. These are calculated by multiplying the 85th percentile ITE values shown in Table I by the factors related to the number of bedrooms identified in Note 2 of this table, for each multifamily residential type, and then weighting the results by the assumed mix of 25 percent apartment/75 percent condominium identified for the Railyard project. It is conservatively assumed that the parking demand reported in ITE for "2 or more" bedroom units is applicable to 2 bedroom units, with the increment between 1 and 2 bedroom units added to the 2 bedroom rate to identify the 3 bedroom rate. A 10 percent reduction in the parking demand rate is then applied, reflecting the lower parking demand rate for second -home units, as reflected in the peer parking codes, and the result rounded to the nearest 0.05. The resulting figures are slightly higher than the average of the peer community rates, which is appropriate given Truckee's relatively limited transit options. It also bears noting that the 25 percent additional spaces for guests in the Town Code is higher than the guest parking requirements of any of the peer communities. • To be able to apply the shared parking factors below, rates for multifamily work/live units were generated both for the residential and the commercial land uses. The parking rate for the residential element is identical to that for other multifamily units. For the commercial element, a reduction of 0.25 spaces is first applied to reflect the assumption that 25 percent of units have an employee that is also a resident (and thus does not generate additional parking demand). The parking demand for the commercial use is then added, reflecting the assumption that 40 percent of this commercial space is retail and 60 percent office in the Downtown Extension district, and 100 percent is office in the remaining districts. The resulting commercial rates are 2.25 per unit in the Downtown Extension district and 2.31 elsewhere. Reduction for Internal and Pedestrian/Bicycle Trips As the Truckee Railyard Project is a mixed -use development project near other trip generators, there will be internal and pedestrian/bicycle trips that could tend to reduce parking needs. However, the applicable internal reductions for a parking analysis are not the same as a trip generation analysis. If, for example, a person decides to go to the Truckee Railyard Trip/Parking Generation Page 14 May 30, 2008 movies and then, afterwards, go out to dinner, the movie to dinner trip generates no auto trips. However, the parking demand remains on site even though the land use the parking demand is associated with shifts. Therefore, it is only appropriate to make reductions in parking demand for the following two types of trips: • Trips with one trip end internal to the site and one trip end external to the site that occur via non -auto modes. As existing transit service in the area is infrequent, the proportion of travel to the site via transit is assumed to result in a negligible reduction in parking demand. The site, however, is within a convenient walk distance of existing and planned commercial, recreational, and residential development in the downtown area, which will tend to reduce parking demand in the Railyard. • Walking trips between residential/hotel and commercial/office uses, either within the same block or between blocks. As a portion of the parking spaces for the residential units have been identified as dedicated when a person parks their car in a dedicated residential space and walks to residential/commercial uses, an internal reduction would be applicable. This reduction is applicable to the work portion of the live/work units, as well as the commercial and office uses. The proportion of total internal trips associated with dedicated parking spaces was calculated for each land use. For instance, for a one -bedroom multifamily unit 1.5 spaces are needed for each residential unit, 1 of which is a dedicated residential space, and this internal reduction would only apply to 67 percent (1/1.5) of the commercial/office parking demand. The applicable reduction for walking trips between residential uses and commercial uses or office uses within a block and between each block of the development were estimated separately and then combined to result in a single reduction factor using the following formula: RTotal = 1 — ((1 — Rwithinblock) X (1 — Rbetweenblocks) X (1 — Rextemal)) Where: RTotal Rwithinblock Rbetweenblocks Rextemal = Total Percent Reduction in Parking Demand = Reduction in Parking Demand for Non -Auto Trips from Residential Dedicated Spaces to Commercial/Office Within a Block = Reduction in Parking Demand for Non -Auto Trips from Residential Dedicated Spaces to Commercial/Office Between Block = Reduction in Parking Demand for Non -Auto trips to External to the Railyard Site Note that no reduction in parking demand is expected for the residential and lodging uses, as non -auto trips generated by residents and lodging guests simply result in their Truckee Railyard Trip/Parking Generation Page 15 May 30, 2008 vehicle staying in their on -site space. Finally, it should be noted that no additional parking is assumed to be generated on the Railyard site to reflect persons parking on the Railyard site and walking to other portions of the downtown area. Parking Demand Analysis Multiplying the base parking rates by the resulting total reduction factor yields the peak parking demand for each land use on each block. Dedicated (non -shared) parking is planned to consist of all hotel parking, one space for each multifamily dwelling unit, and two spaces for each single-family dwelling units, while the remaining parking spaces can be shared among all uses. As shown in Table K, 161 dedicated (non -shared) spaces will be required at the end of Phase 1. At buildout as shown in Table L, the total dedicated parking spaces equals 655 spaces (excluding spaces for single family residences, which are assumed to be provided at individual sites and are not included in this analysis). The remainder of the parking demand can be accommodated in shared parking supply, and thus can be reduced to reflect the use of an individual parking space for various land uses with differing peak periods of demand. A "shared parking" analysis was conducted to quantify parking demand for the shared spaces for each period of day. This shared parking analysis is based upon the methodology for assessment of shared parking developed by the Urban Land Institute, as documented in Shared Parking (2004). This strategy recognizes the fact that some land uses (such as office) have peak parking needs that occur at different times than other land uses (such as residential). Therefore, the parking supply required to accommodate the needs of both land uses is less than the sum of the peak parking needs for the individual land uses. Shared parking analysis is based on day of week and hourly time of day parking factors for different land use, reflecting the proportion of peak demand occurring in each period. The shared parking methodology by ULI provides hourly factors for employees as well as customers/visitors. Moreover, base parking ratios have also been estimated for visitors/customers versus employees. In order to estimate combined hourly factors for employees and visitors/customers, weighted averages of their base parking ratios with respect to their corresponding hourly variation in parking needs were calculated. The parking demand for each individual land use in a development block by time of day is then estimated. Based on these estimates, the total number of parking spaces required for all the land uses during a particular hour is calculated by summing the parking requirements for all the land uses within the block for each hour. The shared parking analysis included the following assumptions: • Parking for lodging is considered to be dedicated and therefore cannot be shared with other uses. • One space per multifamily residential unit is assumed to be dedicated and not available to be shared. Truckee Railyard Trip/Parking Generation Page 16 May 30, 2008 • It is also assumed that the parking spaces associated with the Union Pacific Railroad office in the relocated balloon track would not be shared. • While the Town may choose to manage a portion of the shared parking supply as employee parking only, it is assumed for purposes of this analysis that this parking is managed so that the overall required number of parking spaces is not increased. For instance, some parking can be designated as employee only during particular times of day or can be temporarily changed for special events (such as a film festival) that change the balance of parking needs. • Shared parking analyses conducted for both weekday and weekend conditions indicated that peak parking demand would be higher on the weekend (specifically on Saturday). The day of week factors appropriate for Saturday were therefore applied. The right-hand portion of Table K presents the shared parking analysis for the buildout of Phase 1. As indicated, a total of 275 shared parking spaces are required to serve all Phase 1 land uses, along with 161 dedicated spaces, for a total of 436 spaces. Parking need would peak around 8 PM. The ability to share parking spaces reduces overall parking demand by 1 percent in the Hotel Block (a relatively low number due to the high proportion of dedicated spaces for the hotel), and by 9 percent in the Theater Block. Figure A presents a graph of parking demand by time of day. The shared parking analysis for the full buildout is presented in the right portion of Table L. A total of 719 shared spaces would be required, along with 655 dedicated spaces, for a total of 1,374 spaces. As also indicated in Figure B, peak shared parking demand for the entire Railyard would occur around 8:00 PM. The need to share parking between blocks is relatively low, as parking demand for the various blocks tends to peak around the same time of day. The reduction in parking demand associated with shared use of parking range from a low of no reduction in the Trout Creek district (as it is wholly residential) to a 35 percent reduction in the Industrial Heritage district (due to the good mix of residential versus commercial uses). TRIP DISTRIBUTION The distribution of trips generated on the Railyard site was developed using the Truckee TransCAD traffic model. For both the 2004 model and the model for buildout of the General Plan (with the adjustments for changes in the approved Martis Valley Community Plan projects subsequent to the adoption of the Community Plan), the assigned vehicle -trip origin/destination matrices were obtained. These were then "collapsed" into the various external "gates" to the Railyard traffic analysis area as well as the internal distribution areas, and totaled to identify the proportion of trips generated by the site to and from each distribution area or gate. Adjustments were made to reflect the types of trips generated by the proposed project land uses, as well as changes to the local roadway network since 2004 (such as the completion of the SR 89 Truckee Railyard Trip/Parking Generation Page 17 May 30, 2008 North/Donner Pass Road Roundabout, providing a new access point into the Greys Crossing area). The resulting distributions for 2008 and 2025 are shown in Table M. The shifts in trip distribution proportions between the two analysis years reflect growth occurring in specific areas (such as in Martis Valley and the Planned Community 3 area around the SR 267/Brockway Road area) that will increase the proportion of traffic bound to/from the growth areas and will result in a corresponding reduction in traffic distribution to other areas. TABLE A: Analysis of Blended Base Trip Rates for Railyard EIR Traffic Analysis Weekday Trip Generation Rates 1 PM Peak Hour Percent Daily In Out I Total Restaurant Space Fast Food Restaurant (No Drive Through) 20% 716.00 13.34 12.81 26.15 High -Turnover Sit -Down Restaurant 40% 127.15 6.66 4.26 10.92 Quality Restaurant 40% 89.95 4.57 2.92 7.49 Blended 230.04 7.16 5.43 12.59 Multifamily Residential Units Apartment 25% 6.72 0.40 0.22 0.62 Condominium 75% 5.86 0.35 0.17 0.52 Blended 6.08 0.36 0.18 0.55 Work/Live Units -- In Downtown Extension Zone Adjustment for Internal Work Trips -10% -0.61 -0.03 -0.03 -0.06 Residential Unit 5.47 0.33 0.15 0.50 Specialty Retail 40% 44.32 1.19 1.52 2.71 Office 60% 11.01 0.25 1.24 1.49 Blended Total 29.80 0.96 1.50 2.48 Work/Live Units -- In Industrial Heritage Zone Adjustment for Internal Work Trips -10% -0.61 -0.03 -0.03 -0.06 Residential Unit 5.47 0.33 0.15 0.50 Office 100% 11.01 0.25 1.24 1.49 Total 16.48 0.58 1.39 1.99 Civic Use Museum 50% 30.00 1.50 3.00 4.50 Library 50% 54.00 3.40 3.69 7.09 Blended 42.00 2.45 3.34 5.80 Source 1: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation, 7th Edition. Table B: Trip Generation of Truckee Railyard Master Plan -- End of Phase 1 Adjustment Factors Project Generated Trips on Adjacent Streets Trip Generation Rates 1 Total Project Generated Trips Non -Auto Trips Between Non -Auto Trips Within Non -Auto Trips External Site Access Project Generated PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Pass -By PM Peak Hour Location Description Land Use Quantity Unit 2 Daily In Out Total Daily In Out Total Blocks Blocks to Site Daily In Out Total Trips Daily In Out Total Downtown Retail Specialty Retail 3.5 KSF 44.32 1.19 1.52 2.71 155 4 5 9 13% 44% 5% 71 2 2 4 20% 57 2 1 3 Extension - Restaurant Restaurant (Blended) 4.0 KSF 230.04 7.16 5.43 12.59 920 29 21 50 13% 17% 5% 632 20 14 34 25% 474 15 11 26 Hotel Block Lodging Units Hotel 60 Rooms 8.92 0.34 0.36 0.70 535 21 21 42 11% 17% 0% 395 16 15 31 0% 395 16 15 31 Subtotal - Block 1,610 54 47 101 1,098 38 31 69 926 33 27 60 Multifamily Units Multifamily(Blended) 70 DU 6.08 0.36 0.18 0.55 426 25 14 39 11% 4% 0% 362 21 12 33 0% 362 21 12 33 Live/Work Units Multifamily (Blended) 6 DU 6.08 0.36 0.18 0.55 36 2 1 3 11% 4% 0% 31 2 1 3 0% 31 2 1 3 Downtown Work/Live Units Work/Live (Blended Total) 12 KSF 29.80 0.96 1.50 2.48 358 12 18 30 13% 6% 4% 280 9 14 23 16% 235 8 11 19 Extension - Retail Specialty Retail 15.0 KSF 44.32 1.19 1.52 2.71 665 18 23 41 13% 10% 4% 497 13 18 31 20% 398 10 15 25 Theater Block Restaurant Restaurant (Blended) 4.5 KSF 230.04 7.16 5.43 12.59 1,035 32 25 57 13% 10% 4% 774 24 19 43 25% 581 18 14 32 Movie -Theater Movie Theater with Matinee 1000 Seats 2.24 0.03 0.04 0.07 2,240 30 40 70 13% 11% 4% 1,657 22 30 52 0% 1,657 22 30 52 Subtotal - Block 4,760 119 121 240 3,601 91 94 185 3,264 81 83 164 Total - Phase 1 6,370 173 168 341 4,699 129 125 254 4,190 114 110 224 Residential Multifamily Units 70 DU 362 21 12 33 Subtotal by Live/Work Units 6 DU 31 2 1 3 Land Uses at Work/Live Units 12 DU 235 8 11 19 Build Out - Total Residential 88 DU 628 31 24 55 Lodging Units 60 Rooms 395 16 15 31 Commercial 27 KSF 1,510 45 41 86 Theater 1,000 Seats 1,657 22 30 52 Note 1 - Trip generation rates are estimated using the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition (2003). Note 2 - KSF = 1,000 square feet gross floor area. Source: LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Table C: Trip Generation of Truckee Railyard Master Plan -- Buildout Adjustment Factors Project Generated Trips on Adjacent Streets Trip Generation Rates 1 Total Project Generated Trips Non -Auto Non -Auto Non -Auto Trips Trips Trips Between Within External Blocks Blocks to Site Site Access Project Generated Trips PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Location Description Land Use Quantity Unit 2 Daily In Out Total Daily In Out Total Daily In Out Total Pass -By Trips Daily In Out Total Downtown Extension - Hotel Block Retail Specialty Retail 3.5 KSF Restaurant Restaurant (Blended) 4.0 KSF Lodging Units Hotel 60 Rooms Subtotal - Block 44.32 1.19 1.52 2.71 230.04 7.16 5.43 12.59 8.92 0.34 0.36 0.70 155 4 5 9 920 29 22 51 535 21 21 42 1,610 54 48 102 18% 44% 5% 12% 17% 5% 18% 17% 0% 67 641 346 1,054 2 2 4 20 16 36 14 13 27 36 31 67 20% 25% 0% 54 2 1 3 481 15 12 27 346 14 13 27 881 31 26 57 Downtown Extension - Donner Pass Rd to Street B Multifamily Units Multifamily (Blended) 153 DU Live/Work Units Multifamily (Blended) 10 DU Work/Live Units Work/Live (Blended Total) 35 DU Office General Office Building 7.0 KSF Retail Specialty Retail 31.5 KSF Restaurant Restaurant (Blended) 6.0 KSF Movie -Theater Movie Theater with Matinee 1000 Seats Grocery Store Supermarket 20.0 KSF Civic Civic 25 KSF Subtotal - Block 6.08 0.36 0.18 0.55 6.08 0.36 0.18 0.55 29.80 0.96 1.50 2.48 11.01 0.25 1.24 1.49 44.32 1.19 1.52 2.71 230.04 7.16 5.43 12.59 2.24 0.03 0.04 0.07 102.24 5.33 5.12 10.45 42.00 2.45 3.34 5.80 930 55 28 83 61 4 2 6 1,043 34 53 87 77 2 9 11 1,396 38 48 86 1,380 43 33 76 2,240 30 40 70 2,045 107 102 209 1,050 61 84 145 10,222 374 399 773 18% 9% 0% 18% 9% 0% 13% 8% 4% 22% 7% 4% 12% 5% 4% 12% 5% 4% 36% 26% 4% 12% 5% 4% 22% 7% 4% 655 43 795 53 1,114 1,101 1,007 1,632 723 7,123 39 19 58 3 1 4 26 40 66 1 7 8 30 39 69 34 27 61 13 18 31 85 82 167 42 58 100 273 291 564 0% 0% 16% 15% 20% 25% 0% 36% 10% 655 39 19 58 43 3 1 4 668 22 33 55 45 1 6 7 891 24 31 55 826 26 20 46 1,007 13 18 31 1,044 54 53 107 651 38 52 90 5,830 220 233 453 Downtown Extension - Lumber Yard Area Multifamily Units Multifamily (Blended) 67 DU Live/Work Units Multifamily (Blended) 5 DU Work/Live Units Work/Live (Blended Total) 15 DU Office General Office Building 3.0 KSF Retail Specialty Retail 15.0 KSF Restaurant Restaurant (Blended) 5.0 KSF Subtotal - Block 6.08 0.36 0.18 0.55 6.08 0.36 0.18 0.55 29.80 0.96 1.50 2.48 11.01 0.25 1.24 1.49 44.32 1.19 1.52 2.71 230.04 7.16 5.43 12.59 407 24 12 36 30 2 1 3 447 14 23 37 33 1 4 5 665 18 23 41 1,150 36 27 63 2,732 95 90 185 14% 6% 0% 14% 6% 0% 13% 6% 4% 17% 7% 4% 10% 3% 4% 10% 3% 4% 312 23 345 24 554 958 2,216 18 10 28 2 0 2 11 18 29 1 3 4 15 19 34 30 22 52 77 72 149 0% 0% 16% 15% 20% 25% 312 18 10 28 23 2 0 2 290 9 15 24 20 1 2 3 443 12 15 27 719 23 16 39 1,807 65 58 123 Heritage District Live/Work Units Multifamily (Blended) 125 DU Work/Live Units Work/Live (Blended Total) 75 DU Office General Office Building 5.0 KSF Retail Specialty Retail 2.5 KSF Restaurant Restaurant (Blended) 2.5 KSF Subtotal - Block 6.08 0.36 0.18 0.55 16.48 0.58 1.39 1.99 11.01 0.25 1.24 1.49 44.32 1.19 1.52 2.71 230.04 7.16 5.43 12.59 760 45 23 68 1,236 44 104 148 55 1 6 7 111 3 4 7 575 18 14 32 2,737 111 151 262 9% 7% 0% 9% 7% 0% 11% 7% 3% 9% 5% 3% 9% 5% 3% 612 997 43 91 471 2,214 36 19 55 35 84 119 1 5 6 2 4 6 15 11 26 89 123 212 0% 11% 15% 20% 25% 612 36 19 55 887 31 75 106 37 1 4 5 73 2 3 5 353 11 9 20 1,962 81 110 191 Trout Creek Multifamily Units Multifamily (Blended) 42 DU Single Family Units Single Family 18 DU Live/Work Units Multifamily (Blended) 25 DU Subtotal - Block 6.08 0.36 0.18 0.55 9.57 0.64 0.37 1.01 6.08 0.36 0.18 0.55 255 15 8 23 172 12 7 19 152 9 5 14 579 36 20 56 13% 0% 0% 13% 0% 0% 13% 0% 0% 211 143 126 480 12 7 19 10 6 16 7 5 12 29 18 47 0% 0% 0% 211 12 7 19 143 10 6 16 126 7 5 12 480 29 18 47 Balloon Track Area UPRR Office Office 5.0 KSF 11.01 0.25 1.24 1.49 55 1 6 7 0% 0% 0% 52 1 6 7 0% 52 1 6 7 Total - Build Out 17,935 671 714 1,385 13,139 505 541 1,046 11,012 427 451 878 Subtotal by Land Uses at Build Out Residential Multifamily Units 262 DU 1,178 69 36 105 Live/Work Units 165 DU 804 48 25 73 Work/Live Units 125 DU 1,845 62 123 185 Single Family Units 18 DU 143 10 6 16 - Total Residential 570 DU 3,970 189 190 379 Lodging Units 60 Rooms 346 14 13 27 Commercial / Office / Civic 135 KSF 5,689 211 230 441 Theater 1,000 Seats 1,007 13 18 31 Note 1 - Trip gene ation rates are estimated using the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation, 7th Edition (2003) manual. Note 2 - KSF = 1,000 square feet gross floor area. Source: LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Truckee Railyard/Trip Generation with intemal.wb; Table D: Trip Generation of Existing Land Uses To Be Removed Project Generated Trips on Tna Generation Rates' Total Pro ect Generated Trips Ad acent Streets PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Phase Description Land Use Quantity Unit2 Daily In Out Total Daily In Out Total Pass -By Trips Daily In Out Total Phase 1 Gas Cardlock — — — Truckee Glass Building Materials 4.0 KSF Total — — — — 45.16 2.11 2.38 4.49 337 14 14 28 181 8 10 18 518 22 24 46 20% 25% 270 11 11 22 136 6 8 14 406 17 19 36 Buildout Gas Cardlock — — — Truckee Glass Building Materials 4 KSF Lumber Yard 3 Building Materials 30.3 KSF Total — — — — 45.16 2.11 2.38 4.49 45.16 2.11 2.38 4.49 337 14 14 28 181 8 10 18 1,368 64 72 136 1,886 86 96 182 20% 25% 25% 270 11 11 22 136 6 8 14 1,026 48 54 102 1,432 65 73 138 Note 1 - Trip generation rates are estimated using the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition (2003). Note 2 - KSF = 1,000 square feet gro. Note 3: Per ITE definition, warehouse, office and retail space is all included in total floor area. Source: LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. TABLE E: Ob serv ed Truckee Parki ng Utilization -- Peak Time of Day Weekd ay Midday Peak Peak Utiliz ation Weekend Midday Peak Peak Utilization Wednesday Wednesday Wednesday Wednesday Wednesday Wednesday Wednesday Wednesday Wednesday Wednesday Wednesday Wednesda y Wednesday Wednesday Wednesday , August 23, 2006 , September 27, 2006 , October 25, 2006 , November 15, 2006 , December 13, 2006 , January 17, 2007 , February 14, 2007 , March 14, 2007 , April 18, 2007 , May 16, 2007 , June 20, 2007 , July 18, 2007 , August 15, 2007 , September 19, 2007 , October 17, 2007 606 64.2% Saturday, August 26, 2006 516 54 .7% Saturd ay, S eptember 23 and 30, 2006 508 53.8% Saturday, October 21 and 28, 2006 454 48 .1% Saturday, Nov ember 18, 2006 499 52 .9% Saturday, December 16, 2006 445 47 .1% S aturday, January 20, 2007 471 49 .9% Saturday, February 17, 2007 477 50.5% S aturday, March 17, 2007 392 41.5% Saturday, April 21, 2007 413 43. 8% Saturday, May 19, 2007 557 59. 0% Saturday, June 23, 2007 614 65. 0% Saturday, July 21, 2007 523 55. 4% Saturday, August 18, 2007 476 50.4% Saturday, September 22, 2007 474 50.2% Saturday, October 20 .2007 530 736 556 533 500 491 603 487 390 517 476 576 638 562 563 56 .1% 78.0% Note 1 58 .9% 56.5 % 53 .0% 52 .0% 63 .9% 51 .6% 41 .3% 54 .8% 50 .4% 61 .0% 67 .6 % 59 .5 % 59.6% 1. Note 1: Day of "Wine, Walk, Shop" special event. Excluded from analysis. Source: Town of Truckee. TABLE F: Analy sis of P arking Dem and Adjustment Fact or for Dow ntown Tr uckee C ommer cial Us es Peak Observed Parking Demand Parking Utilization of Other Uses at Peak Time (1) Residential (2) Hotel (3) Post Office (4) Railroad Depot (5) Total: Other Uses Estimated Existing Commercial Parking De mand Existing Downtown Truckee Commercial Land Uses Use Floor Area (KSF) Bank 3.31 3.33 General Retail (Clothing/G ifts) 95.03 3.77 Grocery/Liquo r/Pharmacy 6.00 5 Hardware /Building M aterials 4. 23 3.33 Furniture/Appliance/Home 1.76 2 Studio for Dance and Art 1. 17 5 Personal Services 6.25 4 Restaurant 35.79 11.33 General Office 44.58 4 Mortuary Service (6) 1. 20 4 Medical/Dental Office 4.39 5 Travel/Insurance/Real Estate 11.97 4 Warehouse/Storage 11. 00 0.5 Total Parking Demand at Peak Time Ratio of Peak Parking Demand: Observed to Calculated at Town Code Standard Rates Base Rate (Spaces per KSF) Weekday Analysi s 614 14 33 26 5 78 536 Base Shared Parking Fact ors Parking Demand at Time of Peak Demand Day of Weeks Time of Day 1.00 1.00 11 0.90 1.00 322 1 .00 1.00 30 0.90 1 .00 13 0.90 1 .00 3 1 .00 0.50 3 1.00 1 .00 25 0 .85 0.91 314 1 .00 0 .86 153 1 .00 1.00 5 1.00 0 .93 20 1.00 0.91 44 1 .00 1 .00 6 949 0 .56 Weekend Analysis 638 23 33 26 5 87 551 Base Shared Parking Factors Parking Demand at Time of Peak Day of Week I Time of Day 0 .00 0.00 0 1 .00 1 .00 358 1.00 1 .00 30 1 .00 1 .00 14 1.00 1 .00 4 1.00 1.00 6 1 .00 1 .00 25 1 .00 0 .87 353 0.10 0.80 14 1.00 1 .00 5 1 .00 0.80 18 0.80 0 .80 31 1.00 1.00 6 858 0.64 Note 1: Exclude s some uses (such as the gas stations) where offstreet parking lots are not counted in the parking count surv eys. No parking demand is assumed for museum, church, community center or me eting hall uses at period of pe ak demand. Note 2: Assume that 2/3 of obse rved parking in Zone 26C and all of Zones 36, 40 and 41 are reside nts, per Town Staff direction . Note 3: Assumes 65% of all 50 existing hotel rooms have one car parked on the stree t during midday, per Urban Land Institute data regarding parking demand by time of day. Note 4: Based on Wilbur Smith and Town counts, and Wilbur Smith estimates of Post Office parking needs Note 5: LSC estimate. Note 6: As Mortuary Se rvice is not specified in the To wn Code, the rate is assumed to be similar to General Office T ABL E G: Multifamily Residential Parking C ode Rates of Peer C ommunities M ulti -Family Dwelling (in spaces per dwelling unit) Jurisdiction Parking Code Studio 1 -bedr oom 2 -bedroom 3 -bedr oom 4 -bedroom Town of Truckee 1 .5 + 25% for Guest Parking = 1 .875 1 .5 + 25% for Guest Parking =1.875 2 + 25 % for Gu est Parking = 2.5 2 + 25% for Guest Parking = 2 .5 2 + 25 % for Guest Parking = 2.5 North Tahoe Area of Placer Counq'i 0 .5 1.5 2 .5 3 .0 4 .0 Town of Mammoth Lakes - 1 + plus 2 for four units up to twelve + 4 for thirteenth to forty-eighth unit 2 + pl us 2 for four units up to twelve + 4 for thirteenth to forty-eighth unit 3 + plus 2 for four units up to twelve + 4 for thirteenth to forty-eighth unit 3 + plus 2 for four units up to twelve + 4 for thirt eenth to forty-eighth unit Village at Mammoth 1 .0 1.0 1 .0 1 .5 - Park City, UT 1 per DU for Apt/Condo < 650 SF 1.5 per DU for Apt/Condo > 650 SF and < 1,000 SF 2 p er DU for Apt/Condo > 1,000 SF and < 2,500 SF 3 per DU for Apt/Condo > 2,500 SF 3 per DU for Apt/Condo > 2,500 SF Vail. CO Within commercial core area 1.4 per dwelling unit Outside of commercial core area 1.5 p er DU for unit < 500 SF 2 p er DU f or unit > 500 SF and < 2,000 SF 2 per DU for unit > 500 SF and < 2,000 SF 2 .5 per DU for unit > 2,000 SF 2 .5 per DU for unit > 2,000 SF Summit County, CO (Condo -Hotel) 1 .0 1 .5 1.5 1 .5 1.5 Aspen. CO " Infill area" w/in a mixed use building 1 space per unit; No requir em ent for residential units in the CC and C-1 Zone Districts "Other areas" w/in a mixed use building 1 sp ac e p er unit "Infill area" multi -family as a single use 1 sp ac e p er unit "Other areas" multi -family as a single use - 1 .0 2.0 2 .0 2 .0 Jackson, WY 1. 25 1.75 2 .0 2 .5 3 .0 Note 1: Assumes studio and 1 -bedroom has 1 bed; additional bedrooms have 1 bed each. Source: Municipal/ County Codes. TABLE H: Hotel Parking Code Rates of Peer Communities Jurisdiction Parking Code Town of Truckee 1 / room + 0.5 per employee on peak shift + accessory use spaces North Tahoe Area of Placer County 1 / room + 1 / 250 SF meeting / display area + 1 / 400 SF retail area + 1/ full-time admin emp. + 1/2 other FTE + 1/3 part-time emp. Town of Mammoth Lakes 1 / room + 2 per manager unit + 1 for every 20 units Village at Mammoth 1 / room + 2 per manager unit + 1 for every 20 units Park City, UT 1 / room + one per 200 SF of separately leasable area Vail, CO (within commercial core area) 0.7/ unit Vail, CO (outside commercial core area) 0.4 / unit + 0.1 space per each 100 SF of residential floor area, max of 1.0 spaces per unit Summit County, CO 1/room Aspen, CO ("infill area") 5 / unit; No requirement for lodging units in the CC and C-1 Zone Districts Aspen, CO ("other areas") 0.7 / unit Jackson, WY 1/room + 1 per 500 SF commercial space Note: SF = square feet, KSF = thousand square feet. Source: Municipal codes. TABLE I: ITE Parking Generation - Parking Demand Data Parking Demand Ratio (vehicles per unit) Land Use Type Average Peak Period 85th Percentile Lodging Hotel 0.91/room 1.14/room Motel 0.90/room 1.02/room Resort Hotel (1) 1.42/room 1.86/room Residential (2) Low/Mid-Rise Apartment 1.20/DU 1.46/DU Condo/Townhouse 1.46/DU 1.68/DU Note 1: While provided in the Parking Generation document, this land use is defined as a relatively large hotel property with multiple on -site recreational amenities (golf course, tennis courts, etc.) and therefore does not direcly pertain to the type of hotel development proposed for the Railyard. Note 2: The ITE data does not break out residential parking demand by number of bedrooms per unit. However, the available data cited in the report indicates that apartment sites with less than 1.5 bedrooms on average generate parking demand 8 percent less than the average, while apartment complexes with an average of 2.0 or more bedrooms generate parking demand 13 percent greater than average. Source: Parking Generation, 3rd Edition, ITE, 2004. TABLE J: Recommended Railyard Parki ng Trip R ates Does Not Reflect Reductions for Shared Parking Land Use Base Truckee Code Downtown Truckee Commercial Parking Factor Rec ommended Railyard Rate Gen eral Retail Restaurant Office Grocery Store M ovie Theater Civ ic Lodging Units Multifamily DU Studio 1 BR 2 BR 3 BR Single Family DU Multifamily Live/Wo rk Units (All 1 BR) M ultifamily Work/Live Units (All 1 BR) In Downtown Extension Residential Unit Adjustment for Internal Work Trips -10% Proportion of Commercial Land Use Specialty Retail 40% Office 60% Blended Commercial Total Commercial In Industrial He ritage Residential Unit Adjustment fo r Interna l Work Trips -10% Proportion of Commercial Land Use Office 100% Total Commercial 3 .77 per KSF 11.33 per KSF 4 per KSF 0 .2 per Seat + 10 Empl oyee Spaces 2 per KSF 1 per Room + 0 .5 p er peak Employee 1 .5 per DU + 25% Guest Spaces 1.5 per DU + 25% Guest Spaces 2 per DU + 25 % Guest Spaces 2 per DU + 25 % Guest Spaces 2 per DU 1. 5 per DU + 25% Guest Spaces -0.25 2. 41 2.56 2. 50 -0.25 2. 56 0 .64 2.41 per KSF 0 .64 7.25 per KSF 0.64 2 .56 per KSF 6.72 per KSF NA 0 .19 per Seat NA 2 .00 per KSF 1.00 per R oom + 0 .5 per peak Employee 1.10 1 .35 1 .65 1 .95 2.00 1.35 per DU per DU per DU per DU per DU per DU 1 .35 per DU 2 .25 per DU 1 .35 per DU 2.31 per DU Source: LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Table K: Parking Analysis for Truckee Railyard Master Plan -- Phase I Total Total Required Parking Reduction for Parking for Demand for Day of Total Base Non -Auto Individual Land Dedicated Shared Week Location Description Quantity Unit Parking Rate Parking Access' Use Parking 2 Parking Factor3 Max Required Spaces for Shared Use Parking Demand by Hour for Shared Parking Analysis' 6.00 AM 7.00 AM 8.00 AM 9.00 AM 10.00 AM 11.00 AM 12.00 PM 1.00 PM 2.00 PM 3.00 PM 4.00 PM 5.00 PM 6.00 PM 7.00 PM 8.00 PM 9.00 PM 10.00 PM 11.00 PM 12.00 AM Downtown Extension - Hotel Block Retail 3.5 KSF 2.41 per KSF 8 32% 5 0 5 1.0 Restaurant 4.0 KSF 7.25 per KSF 29 23% 22 0 22 1.0 Lodging Units4 60 Rooms 1 per Unit+0.5 per Pk Empl 73 0% 73 73 0 1.0 Subtotal 110 100 73 27 0 1 0 1 0 4 0 4 1 7 0 8 2 9 0 11 3 14 0 17 4 17 0 21 4 21 0 25 5 21 0 26 5 17 0 22 5 13 0 18 5 13 0 18 5 17 0 22 4 22 0 26 4 22 0 26 3 20 0 23 3 15 0 18 2 13 0 15 1 12 0 13 0 7 0 7 26 Downtown Extension - Donner Pass Rd to Street B Multifamily Units - Studio 17 DU 1.10 per Unit 19 0% 19 17 2 1.0 - 1 BR 35 DU 1.35 per Unit 47 0% 47 35 12 1.0 - 2 BR 18 DU 1.65 per Unit 30 0% 30 18 12 1.0 Live/Work Units - 1 BR 6 DU 1.35 per Unit 8 0% 8 6 2 1.0 Work/Live Units - 1 BR 12 DU - Residential 1.35 per Unit 16 0% 16 12 4 1.0 - Commercial 2.25 per KSF 27 12% 24 0 24 0.5 Retail 15.0 KSF 2.41 per KSF 36 14% 31 0 31 1.0 Restaurant 4.5 KSF 7.25 per KSF 33 12% 29 0 29 1.0 Movie -Theater 1000 Seats 0.19 per Seat 190 11% 169 0 169 1.0 Subtotal 406 373 88 285 2 11 11 2 4 0 1 2 0 33 2 10 10 2 3 1 2 5 0 35 2 9 9 2 3 2 5 9 0 41 1 9 9 1 3 3 12 12 0 50 1 8 8 1 3 5 18 18 0 62 1 8 8 1 3 12 22 22 0 77 1 7 7 1 2 12 26 28 36 120 1 8 8 1 3 12 29 27 77 166 1 8 8 1 3 11 31 23 93 179 1 8 8 1 3 9 31 17 94 172 1 8 8 1 3 7 30 17 94 169 2 10 10 2 3 6 28 22 104 187 2 10 10 2 3 5 25 29 104 190 2 12 12 2 4 4 24 29 136 225 2 12 12 2 4 4 21 26 169 252 2 12 12 2 4 3 16 19 169 239 2 12 12 2 4 2 11 18 136 199 2 12 12 2 4 1 5 15 110 163 2 11 11 2 4 0 0 9 68 107 252 Total - End of Phase 1 516 473 161 312 34 39 49 61 79 98 145 192 201 190 187 209 216 251 275 257 214 176 114 275 Note 1- Non -auto parking reduction is estimated based on Internal trips calculated by ITE methods, adjusted to account for greater internal percent for different retail uses and the proportion of spaces dedicated to residential and lodging uses. Note 2- All residential units areassumed to have one dedicated parking space per dwelling unit. Moreover, hotel is assumed to have all dedicated parking space. Note 3- Day of week and hourly parking factors based on " Shared Parking" (ULI, 2003) Note 4 - Assuming a peak of 25 lodging & spa employees on -site at any one time. Excludes restaurant employees. Source: LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Truckee Railyardfrrip Gen/Parking Gen.wb3 Table L: Parking Analysis for Truckee Railyard Master Plan - At Buildout Total Total Required Parking Reduction for Parking for Demand for Total Base Non -Auto Individual Land Dedicated Shared Location Description Quantity Unit Applied Parking Rate Parking Access I Use Parking 2 Parking Day of Week Factor 3 Max Required Spaces for Shared Use Parking Demand by Hour for Shared Parking Analysis 3 6.00 AM 7.00 AM 8.00 AM 9.00 AM 10.00 AM 11.00 AM 12.00 PM 1.00 PM 2.00 PM 3.00 PM 4.00 PM 5.00 PM 6.00 PM 7.00 PM 8.00 PM 9.00 PM 10.00 PM 11.00 PM 12.00 AM Downtown Retail 3.5 KSF 2.41 per KSF 8 28% 6 0 6 1.0 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 6 6 6 5 5 5 4 3 2 1 0 Extension - Restaurant 4.0 KSF 7.25 per KSF 29 20% 23 0 23 1.0 2 4 7 10 14 17 22 21 18 14 14 17 23 23 21 15 14 12 7 Hotel Block Lodging Units 4 60 Rooms 1.00 per Unit+0.5 per Pk Empl 73 0% 73 73 0 1.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotal 110 102 73 29 2 4 8 12 17 21 27 27 24 20 20 22 28 28 25 18 16 13 7 28 Multifamily Units - Studio 38 DU 1.10 per Unit 42 0% 42 38 4 1.0 4 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 - 1 BR 77 DU 1.35 per Unit 104 0% 104 77 27 1.0 25 22 21 20 19 18 16 18 18 18 19 22 24 26 27 27 27 27 26 - 2BR 38 DU 1.65 per Unit 63 0% 63 38 25 1.0 23 21 20 19 18 16 15 16 16 16 18 20 22 24 25 25 25 25 24 Live/Work Units -1 BR 10 DU 1.35 per Unit 14 0% 14 10 4 1.0 4 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 Downtown Work/Live Units 35 DU Residential - 1 BR 1.35 per Unit 47 0% 47 35 12 1.0 11 10 9 9 8 8 7 8 8 8 8 10 10 12 12 12 12 12 11 Extension - - Commercial 2.25 per KSF 79 11% 70 0 70 0.5 0 2 5 10 13 36 36 35 31 26 21 17 15 13 11 9 6 2 0 Donner Pass Office 7.0 KSF 2.56 per KSF 18 9% 16 0 16 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 3 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rd to Street B Retail 31.5 KSF 2.41 per KSF 76 11% 68 0 68 1.0 2 5 11 27 39 48 57 63 68 68 65 62 55 52 46 36 25 10 0 Restaurant 6.0 KSF 7.25 per KSF 44 11% 39 0 39 1.0 3 7 12 17 24 30 38 36 31 23 23 29 39 39 35 26 24 21 12 Movie -Theater 1000 Seats 0.19 per Seat 190 12% 167 0 167 1.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 76 92 93 93 103 103 135 167 167 135 109 67 Grocery Store 20.0 KSF 6.72 per KSF 134 11% 119 0 119 1.0 3 8 19 46 68 84 100 109 119 119 114 108 96 90 80 63 44 18 0 Civic 25.0 KSF 2.00 per KSF 50 9% 46 0 46 1.0 0 0 2 18 28 35 39 46 46 46 37 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotal 861 795 198 597 75 81 105 172 223 284 350 416 437 424 405 395 370 399 411 373 306 232 148 437 Multifamily Units -Studio 17 DU 1.10 per Unit 19 0% 19 17 2 1.0 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 - 1 BR 33 DU 1.35 per Unit 45 0% 45 33 12 1.0 11 10 9 9 8 8 7 8 8 8 8 10 10 12 12 12 12 12 11 - 2BR 17 DU 1.65 per Unit 28 0% 28 17 11 1.0 10 9 9 8 8 7 7 7 7 7 8 9 10 11 11 11 11 11 11 Downtown Live/Work Units -1 BR 5 DU 1.35 per Unit 7 0% 7 5 2 1.0 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Extension - Work/Live Units 15 DU Lumber Yard - Residential - 1 BR 1.35 per Unit 20 0% 20 15 5 1.0 5 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 Area - Commercial 2.25 per KSF 34 12% 30 0 30 0.5 0 1 2 4 6 16 15 15 13 11 9 7 6 5 5 4 3 1 0 Office 3.0 KSF 2.56 per KSF 8 7% 7 0 7 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Retail 15.0 KSF 2.41 per KSF 36 12% 32 0 32 1.0 1 2 5 12 18 23 27 29 32 32 31 29 26 24 21 17 12 5 0 Restaurant 5.0 KSF 7.25 per KSF 36 12% 32 0 32 1.0 2 6 10 14 20 24 31 30 25 19 19 24 32 32 29 21 20 17 10 Subtotal 233 220 87 133 33 36 43 53 66 84 93 95 91 83 81 87 92 93 87 74 67 55 41 95 Live/Work Units - 2BR 125 DU 1.65 per Unit 206 0% 206 125 81 1.0 74 67 64 60 57 53 49 53 53 53 57 66 71 79 80 80 81 80 77 Work/Live Units 75 DU - Residential -1 BR 1.35 per Unit 101 0% 101 75 26 1.0 24 22 21 19 18 17 16 17 17 17 18 21 23 25 26 26 26 26 25 Heritage - Commercial 2.31 per KSF 173 7% 161 0 161 0.2 0 1 3 4 5 32 29 26 19 13 6 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 District Office 5.0 KSF 2.56 per KSF 13 7% 12 0 12 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Retail 2.5 KSF 2.41 per KSF 6 13% 5 0 5 1.0 0 0 1 2 3 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 3 3 2 1 0 Restaurant 2.5 KSF 7.25 per KSF 18 13% 16 0 16 1.0 1 3 5 7 10 12 16 15 13 10 10 12 16 16 15 11 10 8 5 Subtotal 517 501 200 301 99 93 94 92 93 120 116 118 108 99 96 107 116 124 124 120 119 115 107 124 Multifamily Units -2BR 21 DU 1.65 per Unit 35 0% 35 21 14 1.0 13 12 11 10 10 9 9 9 9 9 10 11 12 14 14 14 14 14 13 - 3 BR 21 DU 1.95 per Unit 41 0% 41 21 20 1.0 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 13 13 13 14 16 17 19 20 20 20 20 19 Trout Creeks Single Family Units 18 DU 2.00 per Unit 36 0% 36 18 18 Live/Work Units 1.0 16 15 14 13 13 12 11 12 12 12 13 15 16 18 18 18 18 18 17 -2BR 12 DU 1.65 per Unit 20 0% 20 12 8 1.0 7 7 6 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 7 8 8 8 8 8 8 - 3 BR 13 DU 1.95 per Unit 25 0% 25 13 12 1.0 11 10 9 9 8 8 7 8 8 8 8 10 10 12 12 12 12 12 11 Subtotal 157 157 85 72 65 61 56 53 51 47 44 47 47 47 51 58 62 71 72 72 72 72 68 72 Balloon Track Area Office 5.0 KSF 2.56 13 5% 12 12 0 1.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total - Build Out 1,891 1,787 655 1,132 274 275 306 382 450 556 630 703 707 673 653 669 668 715 719 657 580 487 371 719 Note 1- Non -auto parking reduction is estimated based on internal trips calculated by ITE methods, adjusted to account for greater internal percent for different retail uses and the proportion of spaces dedicated to residential and lodging uses Note 2- All multifamily residential units areassumed to have one dedicated parking space per dwelling unit. Moreover, hotel is assumed to have all dedicated parking space. Note 3- Day of week and hourly parking factors based on' Shared Parking' (ULI, 2003) Note 4 -Assuming a peak of 25 lodging 8 spa employees on -site at any one time. Excludes restaurant employees. Note 5 - Excludes parking for single family residences, assumed to be provided on individual building sites and not shared. Source: LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Truckee Rallyard/Trip Gen /Parking Gen.wb3 TABLE M: Distribution of Truckee Railyard Site -Generated Vehicle -Trips Distribution Area 2008 2025 1-80 West of SR 89S Along Donner Pass Road West of SR 89 S Frates Lane Along SR 89 S Near Deerfield Drive SR 89S South of West River Street Along Donner Pass Road Between Central 1-80 andSR 89S Along W. River St Between McIver Crossing and SR 89S Along W. River St Between McIver Crossing and Brockway Southern Tahoe Donner Northern Tahoe Donner Along Donner Pass Road Between Central 1-80 and Spring St Between Jibboom, Spring, 1-80 and Bridge Between Jibboom, Bridge, 1-80 and Keiser On Donner Pass Road between Glenshire Drive and 1-80 East River Street Martis Valley Road Palisades Drive S. River Street Brockway Road Between Palisades Drive and Martis Valley Road Glenshire Drive 1-80 East of SR 267 SR 89 North of Donner Pass Rd Along Pioneer Trail Between Donner Pass Rd and Bridge St Recreation Center Site in Triangle Parcel Grays Crossing Accessed by Extension of DPR Commercial Row Internal to Project Site PC3 Area (SR 267 / Brockway Road) Along SR 267 from Brockway to Airport Airport Area Schaffer Mill Road Area Along SR 267 from Airport to Northstar Northstar Area SR 28 East of SR 267 SR 28 West of SR 267 12.5% 6.9% 0.4% 6.6% 5.3% 7.4% 2.6% 0.2% 8.6% 3.0% 0.2% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 1.4% 0.9% 0.2% 1.1% 8.8% 9.8% 3.6% 3.6% 0.0% 0.2% 1.4% 2.0% 1.2% 0.4% 2.2% 0.3% 0.4% 4.6% 1.9% 1.4% 100.0% 9.0% 5.0% 0.3% 4.5% 4.9% 5.3% 2.2% 0.2% 4.2% 1.1% 0.4% 0.6% 0.2% 1.4% 0.2% 3.0% 1.9% 0.3% 2.3% 9.4% 7.7% 5.5% 5.5% 0.2% 2.2% 1.5% 2.0% 5.7% 1.2% 1.5% 1.3% 0.9% 4.6% 2.4% 1.4% 100.0% Figure A: Demand f or Shared Parking by Time of Day -- Phase 1 Parking Demand 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 oeeeN11' ° o° o° o° o° o° o° o° o° o° o° o° o° o° o° o° o° o° o° �• 1 • cb• o ,• N O. N'•• N9,• N. (1,. lb. b' 43. 0• 1 • 4:2)-o,. N p. NN• Nr,. Time of Day O Downtown Extension -- Donner Pass Rd to Street B ❑ Downtown Ext ension -- Hotel Block N ote: Excl udes Parking Re served for Hotel & Residential Uses TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS 2690 Lake Forest Road, Suite C P.O. Box 5875 Tahoe City, California 96145 (530) 583-4053 FAX: (530) 583-5966 EMAIL: info@lsctahoe.com www.lsctahoe.com MEMORANDUM: DISCUSSION OF TRAFFIC IMPACT OF TRUCKEE RAILYARD PROJECT WHEN BRIDGE STREET RAIL CROSSING IS BLOCKED July 7,2008 The purpose of this memorandum is to present an evaluation of the impacts of the proposed Truckee Railyard project on traffic conditions when rail activity causes the at grade Bridge Street crossing of the Union Pacific Railroad tracks to be blocked. As an element of the Donner Summit line providing the shortest rail connection between the Bay Area and points east, at present the at-grade crossing gates block the road 15 to 20 times per day. Use of this line is currently limited by the limited clearance on the 20 tunnels over Donner Summit, as well as the lack of double tracking over some segments. However, with the passage of Proposition 1B (the Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of 2006), substantial funding is now available that could raise tunnel height and reduce the length of single track segments. As a result, train activity could potentially increase to approximately 30 trains per day. The two-track rail crossing gates are located approximately 105 feet south of Donner Pass Road and 120 feet north of West and East River Streets. This provides queuing space for approximately 4 vehicles in the southbound direction and 5 vehicles in the northbound direction before queues could potentially block east-west movements. The Bridge Street at-grade crossing is one of two rail crossing options in the downtown Truckee area. The Mciver Undercrossing lies 0.53 miles to the west of Bridge Street, and allows drivers to divert from Bridge Street to this grade separated crossing via Donner Pass Road on the north side of the tracks or West River Street on the south side of the tracks. Further west, the SR 89 "Mousehole" undercrossing provides a third rail crossing option 1.4 miles west of Bridge Street, while 1.2 miles to the east the SR 267 Bypass provides a fourth. Existing Rail Activity and Traffic Conditions To provide a quantitative basis for evaluation of traffic conditions during rail crossing "gate down" periods, LSC staff observed rail activity and associated traffic queues between 8:00 AM and 6:00 PM on Thursday December 13, 2007 and Friday December 14,2007. As presented in Table A, for every gate-down event, the length of road Traffic Impacts During Rail Activity With Page 2 July 7, 2008 Railyard Development in 2025 closure was recorded as well as the total number of vehicles queued in the southbound direction (including vehicles waiting in the eastbound right turn lane and westbound left turn lane along Donner Pass Road) as well as the number queued in the northbound direction (including vehicles waiting in the eastbound left turn lane on West River Street and the westbound right turn lane on East River Street). A review of this data indicates the following: D A total of nine gate-down events were observed on each of the two days. Twelve of these events were due to freight trains, five due to the Amtrak California Zephyr (include two events triggered by the same train stopping west of the crossing before moving to block the crossing) and two due to rail trucks. o The longest gate-down time was generated by the Amtrak trains, which averaged 2:43 minutes. Freight trains caused the gates to be down for 2:23, while the rail truck crossings caused the gates to be down for 0:54 minutes. For purposes of this analysis, a design gate-down duration was identified equivalent to the 85 th percentile (the length of closure only exceeded on 15 percent of the events), which was found to be 3:14 minutes. D In the southbound direction, the maximum observed queue was 10 vehicles, while the maximum northbound queue was 14 vehicles. Average queue for all trains (excluding rail trucks) was 5.1 in the southbound direction and 6.2 in the northbound direction. Comparing the queue lengths with the available queuing distance between the tracks and the nearest cross street, traffic queues exceeded the available queue distance three to four times per day in each direction. Drivers were observed to typically not block the adjacent intersections. Over these 18 events, traffic queues were never observed to block east-west travel along Donner Pass Road, or for movement between West River Street and Bridge Street south of West River Street. On two occasions, the northbound queue on Bridge Street was observed to block movements in or out of East River Street. While it is not possible to always know a driver's intention, a large proportion of traffic was observed to divert off of Bridge Street and heading west (presumably to the Mciver Undercrossing). This diversion pattern was particularly common once queues formed back to West River Street or Donner Pass Road. Evaluation of Queue Length Versus Gate-Down Time and Traffic Volume The data regarding gate-down time, traffic queues, as well as estimated 15-minute traffic volumes can be used to develop an equation to estimate traffic queues based on gate-down time and volume. As a start, Figure A presents an X-V plot of gate-down time versus resulting traffic queue, which indicates a general positive correlation between these variables. A multivariate regression analysis was conducted based upon the independent values of gate-down time and traffic volume and the dependent value of maximum observed traffic queue. The resulting regression equations were found to be as follows: Traffic Impacts During Rail Activity With Page 3 July 7,2008 Railyard Development in 2025 Maximum SB Queue =1.43 X Gate-down time (in minutes) + 0.024 X 15-Minute 1-Way Volume (R-Square =0.19) Maximum NB Queue = 1.43 X Gate-down time (in minutes) + 0.032 X 15-Minute 1-Way Volume (R-Square =0.31 ) These equations were then used to calculate the maximum queue for each gate-down event. The resulting average maximum queue over all events was relatively consistent with the observed value (5.2 vehicles calculated versus 5.3 observed in the southbound direction, and 6.8 vehicles calculated versus 6.7 observed in the northbound direction). The 15-minute directional traffic volumes were then increased to reflect the traffic impacts of the proposed Railyard project. Reviewing the 2008 no-project and plus project volumes, the Railyard project would increase traffic volumes over the tracks by 17.0 percent in the southbound direction and 23.4 percent in the northbound direction. Applying the formulae to these increased volumes, the queue lengths with the additional Railyard traffic were estimated. As shown in Table B, the 2008 design maximum queue length (at time of maximum queue for any gate-down condition) would increase by 0.6 vehicles (or 7 percent) in the southbound direction and 1.1 vehicles (or 12 percent) in the northbound direction. This relatively small impact on queue length (relative to the percent increase in traffic volume) reflects the low correlation between volume and resulting queue, which in turn can be attributed to the tendency of drivers to divert to the Mciver Undercrossing. A similar analysis of 2025 conditions indicates that future conditions with the proposed Railyard project would result in traffic queues 1.3 vehicles longer than at present in the southbound direction, and 3.1 vehicles longer in the northbound direction. Note that these figures assume no Eastern Undercrossing (which would tend to increase the proportion of drivers choosing to divert out of the queue) and also assume no significant blocking of traffic movements due to queues. Assessment of 2025 With Project Traffic Conditions During "Gate Down" Periods The next step in assessing traffic conditions during gate down periods is to evaluate the degree to which queues would block specific traffic movements. Without an Eastern Undercrossing • In the souttlbound direction, up to six vehicles would be queued beyond the DPR / Bridge Street intersection. Based upon the forecast traffic volumes and the relatively propensity of vehicles to divert (for instance, drivers heading westbound on DPR are more likely to choose to divert to Mciver Undercrossing than drivers heading eastbound), these six vehicles are estimated to consist of one westbound left turn Traffic Impacts During Rail Activity With Page 4 July 7,2008 Railyard Development in 2025 vehicle, three eastbound right turn vehicles, and two southbound through vehicles. Comparing these queue lengths with the available queue storage lengths (with the signal), these queues would not block other lanes. The only other movement that would be blocked would be the southbound right turn queue (as a shared right/through turn lane is identified for 2030 mitigated conditions). This in turn would add approximately three additional vehicles to this queue The total queue length on this movement would therefore be an estimated five vehicles, extending approximately 100 feet. As there is 110 feet of queue length along Bridge Street between the southbound stop bar and the southern edge of the Church Street intersection, movements to or from Church Street would not be blocked. Overall, no significant impacts would result due to the queues. • In the northbound direction, up to eight vehicles would be queued beyond the Bridge / West River Street intersection. Of this total, six are estimated to be northbound through vehicles and two are estimated to be eastbound left vehicles. Once formed beyond West River Street, the northbound through queue would also block northbound right turn movements, adding one vehicle to the queue. In total, the eastbound left turn queue would be 40 feet in length with 120 feet of available queue length, while the northbound through/right queue would be 140 in length with 210 feet of available queue length. No other traffic movements would be impacted by the northbound traffic queues. The forecasts of traffic volumes and queues and the design gate-down period can next be used to estimate the volume of traffic that would be diverted for the design event. The volume of traffic arriving at the at-grade crossing during the gate-down period was estimated. Subtracting the forecast of queuing vehicles, the volume of diverted vehicles was identified. This volume impact was then assigned to the roadway network based upon observed turning movement volumes as well as the relatively propensity of drivers making various movements to make use of alternate routes. These forecasts were made both with and without the Eastern Undercrossing. The intersection LOS analyses are summarized in Table C. Note that these results reflect the average LOS over the course of a 15-minute period during the PM peak-hour that includes one gate-down event (rather than the traffic conditions during only the "gate down" time). This focus on a 15-minute period reflects standard analysis procedures for intersection LOS. Furthermore, these analyses assume that the mitigation measures identified for "gate up" conditions are in place. These results can be summarized as follows: • Other than the two key intersections along Bridge Street, all intersections operate at acceptable LOS with train operations (either with or without the Eastern Undercrossing). Significantly, no additional intersection improvements are needed at intersections away from the crossing to provide adequate traffic conditions reflecting gate-down time than were identified assuming no train-related traffic diversions. Traffic Impacts During Rail Activity With Page 5 July 7, 2008 Railyard Development in 2025 • At Donner Pass Road / Bridge Street, the LOS F conditions identified for gate-up conditions would also be present during train operation periods, though delays would actually be slightly reduced. Provision of the Eastern Undercrossing would result in higher delays than without (as southbound drivers heading for the Eastern Undercrossing would increase the southbound left turn movement). • At Donner Pass Road / West River Street, LOS F conditions would also be present during both gate-up and gate-down periods. During gate-down periods, delays would be reduced with the Eastern Undercrossing, as some northbound drivers that would otherwise make a left turn to access Mciver Undercrossing would instead make a right turn to the Eastern Undercrossing. Roadway LOS results are presented in Table D, reflecting total conditions over the course of the peak hour. To be conservative, two gate-down event of the design duration were assumed. As shown, no roadway segments in the downtown area were found to exceed LOS standards, either with or without the Eastern Undercrossing. TABLE A: Bridge Street Rail Crossing Activity and Traffic Queues Time Gate Down Gate Up Date (hr:mn:sc:) (hr:mn:sc:) Duration Maximum Observed Queue (# of Vehicles) SB on Bridge NB on Bridge 9 5 4 4 5 12 3 5 3 8 1 1 8 9 4 2 4 5 7 5 6 9 10 8 2 9 5 6 4 6 9 14 5 6 7 7 Average Queue (Excluding Rail Trucks) 5.4 6.8 8.75 9.00 12/13/2007 9:29:30 9:32:20 12/13/2007 10:09:53 10:12:04 12/13/2007 11:15:35 11 :18:45 12/13/2007 11:31:10 11 :31 :25 12/13/2007 12:59:45 13:02:28 12/13/2007 14:02:45 14:03:37 12/13/2007 14:04:53 14:09:01 12/13/2007 14:29:40 14:30:22 12/13/2007 16:33:45 16:34:46 12/14/2007 10:05:44 10:09:00 12/14/2007 10:59:10 11 :01 :56 12/14/2007 11 :37:45 11 :40:22 12/14/2007 12:31:19 12:33:00 12/14/2007 12:46:30 12:48:08 12/14/2007 13:51 :02 13:54:47 12/14/2007 14:08:33 14:10:54 12/14/2007 15:14:20 15:15:45 12/14/2007 15:39:05 15:40:39 Average Gate Down Duration Amtrak Freight Rail Truck All 185th Percentile Duration (Train Only) 0:02:50 0:02:11 0:03:10 0:00:15 0:02:43 0:00:52 0:04:08 0:00:42 0:01 :01 0:03:16 0:02:46 0:02:37 0:01:41 0:01 :38 0:03:45 0:02:21 0:01 :25 0:01 :34 0:02:43 0:02:23 0:00:54 0:02:17 0:03:141 Type of Train Freight Freight Freight Rail Truck Freight Amtrak Amtrak Amtrak Freight Freight Freight Freight Freight Freight Amtrak Freight Amtrak Rail Truck Did Train Stop on Crossing, or Continually Move? Move Move Move Move Move Stopped before xing Stop Same train Move Move Move Move Move Move Move Stopped Move Move Move FIGURE A: Gate Down Time Vs. Maximum Traffic Queue 6 4 8 I.Southbound I II mNorthbound 4.504.003.503.002.502.001.501.000.50 14 2 6 o 0.00 Q) ~ 10 - ::::s o (.) ~ C'tS l- I "'C Q) >I Q) f/) .c o E ::::s EOx C'tS ~ (j) ~ 12 ...c: Q) ~ Gate Down Time (minutes) TABLE B: Analysis of Rail Crossing Queue Length With Railyard Traffic 85th Percentile Queue Length, Assuming No Eastern Undercrossing and No Queue Blocking Southbound Northbound Estimated 2008 No Project Estimated 2008 Plus Project Estimated 2025 No Project Estimated 2025 Plus Project # Increase Over Existing 2008 Plus Project 2025 No Project 2025 Plus Project % Increase Over Existing 2008 Plus Project 2025 No Project 2025 Plus Project 8.3 9.5 8.9 10.6 8.7 11.0 9.5 12.5 0.6 1.1 0.5 1.5 1.3 3.1 7% 12% 6% 16% 15% 32% TABLE C: Intersection LOS During Rail Activity 2025 Summer PM Peak Hour Plus Project Conditions During 15-Minute Period With Design Gate Down Event Total Intersection Worst Movement Delay I Delay IIntersection Control Type sec/veh LOS sec/veh LOS WITHOUT EASTERN UNDERCROSSING 2 West River Street / Mciver Crossing Roundabout 7.3 A 9.8 A 3 Donner Pass Road / Mciver Crossing Roundabout 11.1 B 14.2 B 7 Donner Pass Road / Bridge Street Signalized 109.2 F -- 8 Bridge Street / Church Street Unsignalized 7.1 A 23.8 C 19 Bridge Street / West River Street Signalized OVFL F -- 26 DPR / DPR Extension Unsignalized 9.2 A 9.5 A 29 DPR / Eastern Undercrossing Unsignalized N/A -N/A - 30 East River Street / Eastern Undercrossing Unsignalized 5.1 A 12.0 B WITH EASTERN UNDERCROSSING 2 West River Street / Mciver Crossing Roundabout 6.7 A 8.9 A 3 Donner Pass Road / Mciver Crossing Roundabout 9.3 A 11.4 B 7 Donner Pass Road / Bridge Street Signalized 154.3 F -- 8 Bridge Street / Church Street Unsignalized 8.4 A 29.4 D 19 Bridge Street / West River Street Signalized 151.1 F -- 26 DPR / DPR Extension Unsignalized 9.9 A 11.0 B 29 DPR / Eastern Undercrossing Unsignalized 5.6 A 9.1 A 30 East River Street / Eastern Undercrossing Unsignalized 6.8 A 16.4 B Bold indicates LOS standard exceeded Note: OVFL represents overflow conditions where delays per vehicles exceed 200 seclveh and cannot be accurately estimated. Source: LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. TABLE D: 2025 Plus Project Roadway LOS 2025 Summer PM Peak Hour Plus Project Conditions During Hour With 2 Design Gate Down Events Max Allowable Peak-Hour Volume Peak-Hour Peak-Hour LOS LOS per Lane to Obtain Two Way Peak-Direction Threshold Roadway Segments Classification Threshold LOS Threshold Volume Volume Exceeded? WITHOUT EASTERN UNDERCROSSING Mciver Undercrossing Minor Arterial E 1,600 778 395 No Bridge Street Across UPRR Minor Arterial E 1,600 1,649 895 No DPR -Bridge S1. to Spring Street Minor Arterial E 1,200 871 485 No Donner Pass Road -Spring St to Mciver UC Minor Arterial E 1,200 1,343 677 No DPR Extension -Bridge Street to DPR Minor Arterial E 1,200 627 319 No DPR Extension -DPR to Eastern UC Minor Arterial E 1,200 344 179 No West River St -Bridge S1. to Mciver UC Minor Arterial E 1,200 1,211 666 No Eastern Undercrossing Minor Arterial E 1,600 0 0 No East River Street -Bridge Street to Eastern U( Minor Arterial E 1,200 154 85 No WITH EASTERN UNDERCROSSING cMciver Undercrossing Minor Arterial 1,600 684 359 NoL.. Bridge Street Across UPRR Minor Arterial E 1,600 1,620 874 No DPR -Bridge S1. to Spring Street Minor Arterial E 1,200 865 485 No Donner Pass Road -Spring St to Mciver UC Minor Arterial E 1,200 1,248 652 No DPR Extension -Bridge Street to DPR Minor Arterial E 1,200 663 351 No DPR Extension -DPR to Eastern UC Minor Arterial E 1,200 408 208 No West River St -Bridge S1. to Mciver UC Minor Arterial E 1,200 1,117 642 No Eastern Undercrossing Minor Arterial E 1,600 98 66 No East River Street -Bridge Street to Eastern U( Minor Arterial E 1,200 246 131 No TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS 2690 Lake Forest Road, Suite C P.O. Box 5875 Tahoe City, California 96145 (530) 583-4053 FAX: (530) 583-5966 EMAIL: info@lsctahoe.com www.lsctahoe.com MEMORANDUM: DOWNTOWN TRUCKEE INTERSECTION TRAFFIC CONDITIONS IN 2013 WITH RAILYARD PHASE 1 DEVELOPMENT July 29, 2008 The purpose of this memorandum is to present an evaluation of the traffic conditions and roadway requirements at intersections in downtown Truckee in 2013 assuming development of Phase I of the proposed Railyard project. Consistent with the traffic analysis, Phase I is assumed to consist of a total of 88 multifamily residential units, 60 lodging rooms, 27,000 square feet of commercial floor area, and a 1,OOO-seat multiplex theater. While not required by the California Environmental Quality Act, this analysis is useful in assessing near-term improvements that may be needed if the Railyard project proceeds. This analysis builds upon the traffic analysis conducted for the full Railyard EIR. Traffic Volumes 2013 traffic volumes were developed in the following steps: 1. The Truckee TransCAD traffic model was run for 2025 conditions, but adjusted to eliminate the assumption of a Third Tahoe Donner Connection (Pioneer Trail Extension) as well as the connection of Bridge Street northward to this Pioneer Trail Extension. This is to eliminate the redistribution of future traffic to these new roadways, which are not expected to be completed by 2013. This model run also did not include any new development on the proposed Railyard site. 2. Straight line interpolation of 2008 and 2025 volumes was conducted to identify base no-project 2013 volumes in downtown Truckee. 3. The ,additional traffic associated with Phase I of the Railyard project was added using the Traffix software package. 4. The resulting base plus-project 2013 volumes were evaluated for the key Bridge / Donner Pass Road and Bridge / West River Street intersections using the Synchro/Simtraffic software package (in order to replicate the interaction between these closely-spaced intersections). The resulting delays (assuming 2013 Traffic Conditions with Phase 1 Page 2 July 29, 2008 signalization of both intersections and the maximum roadway expansion deemed feasible within the downtown area) were found to be sufficient to cause some traffic through these key intersections to divert to other routes. A review of the relative travel times indicated two key routes that drivers would use as alternates: a. East-west traffic (such as between Donner Pass Road and West River Street west of downtown and Donner Pass Road and Glenshire Drive East of downtown) would begin to divert to Jibboom Street (and to a lesser extent, Church Street). b. Traffic between Donner Pass Road and West River Street west of downtown and the SR 267 corridor southeast of downtown would begin to divert to 1-80 and the SR 267 bypass. The volumes making these through movements in 2013 were identified using the TransCAD model. The proportion of base case traffic volumes shifted to the alternate route was then increased incrementally. The Synchro/Simtraffic analysis was re-run, until the delays at Bridge / Donner Pass Road and Bridge / West River Street dropped to acceptable levels where diversion would no longer occur. This diversion was found to be a relatively low proportion of total through traffic, and well within the potential divertable volumes. 5. The resulting intersection volumes, adjusted for the diversion effect, are presented in Table A. Level Of Service was evaluated using the Synchro/Simtraffic software package for the Bridge / Donner Pass Road and Bridge / West River Street intersection, and using the Traffix software for the remainder of the potentially impacted intersections. The results of these analyses assuming no changes from the existing or base intersection configurations are shown in Table B. As indicated, all intersections would operate at acceptable (E or better) LOS, with the exception of Bridge / DPR, Bridge / West River Street, and West River Street / Mciver Undercrossing. Mitigation needed to attain LOS standards are shown in Table C: • At the West River Street / Mciver Crossing intersection, replacing the existing westbound left turn lane with a two way left turn lane would provide adequate LOS (worst movement LOS of D). • At Bridge Street / West River Street, simply signalizing the intersection would result in an overall LOS of D. • Adequate LOS (LOS E) at the Donner Pass Road / Bridge Street intersection can be provided with signalization and provision of a northbound left turn lane and southbound right turn lane. 2013 Traffic Conditions with Phase 1 Page 3 July 29, 2008 Comparing with the 2008 Plus Project impacts and mitigations, there are no differences in the mitigations required in 2013 in the downtown Truckee area with those required in 2008. TABLE A: 2013 Volumes With Railyard Phase 1 Northbound I Southbound I Eastbound I Westbound I Left I Thru I Right I Left I Thru I Right I Left I Thru I Right I Left I Thru I Right I 2 West River Street / Mciver Crossing 5 3 11 220 8 143 99 376 10 5 330 143 3 Donner Pass Road / Mciver Crossing 105 693 0 0 690 266 149 8 88 0 0 0 6 Donner Pass Road / Spring Street 3 2 0 23 0 241 304 539 0 0 413 49 7 Donner Pass Road / Bridge Street 285 134 336 15 104 28 38 238 301 250 200 6 8 Bridge Street / Church Street 0 124 28 13 96 0 15 5 10 32 0 77 10 Donner Pass Road / Church Street 35 360 7 45 234 36 20 10 8 44 49 86 12 Donner Pass Road / Glenshire Drive 11 0 212 0 0 0 0 416 230 297 368 0 19 Bridge Street / West River Street 311 575 14 40 519 86 138 9 451 17 4 42 26 Donner Pass Road / Donner Pass Road Extension 11 7 1 0 6 279 351 217 7 0 148 18 27 Donner Pass Road Extension / Glenshire Drive 0 0 202 0 0 0 0 524 0 177 226 0 TABLE B: Truckee Rai/yard Phase 1 20 13 PM Peak Hour LOS Total Intersection Worst Movement Delay I Delay I Intersection Control Type sec/veh LOS sec/veh LOS Summer 2 West River Street / Mciver Crossing 3 Donner Pass Road / Mciver Crossing 6 Donner Pass Road / Spring Street 7 Donner Pass Road / Bridge Street 8 Bridge Street / Church Street 10 Donner Pass Road / Church Street 12 Donner Pass Road / Glenshire Drive 19 Bridge Street / West River Street 26 DPR / DPR Extension 27 Glenshire Dr / DPR Extension Unsignalized 28.4 0 155.7 F Roundabout 9.1 A 14.7 B Unsignalized 11.0 A 126.3 F 1 Unsignalized OVFL F OVFL F Unsignalized 3.8 A 10.6 B Unsignalized 6.0 A 23.0 C Unsignalized 4.6 A 21.4 B Unsignalized OVFL F OVFL F Unsignalized 14.6 B 16.1 C Unsignalized 4.3 A 16 C Bold indicates LOS standard exceeded Note 1: As no more than 4 vehicle-hours of delay were found on any traffic movement, this intersection still attains LOS standard. Note 2: OVFL represents overflow conditions where delays per vehicles exceed 200 sec/veh and cannot be accurately estimated. Source: LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Rai/yard.xls TABLE C: Truckee Railyard Plus Project Phase 1 2013 PM Peak Hour Mitigated LOS Unmitigated Mitigated Total Intersection Worst Movement Total Intersection Worst Movement Delay Delay Delay Delay Intersection Control Type sec/veh LOS sec/veh LOS Mitigation Control Type sec/veh LOS sec/veh LOS 2 West River Street / Mciver Crossing Unsignalized 28.4 D 155.7 F WB Left Turn pocket replaced with Two Way LT Lane Unsignalized 6.7 A 27.5 D 7 Donner Pass Road / Bridge Street Unsignalized OVFL F OVFL F Signalize, add NBL and SBR lanes Signal 56.9 E -- 19 Bridge Street / West River Street Unsignalized OVFL F OVFL F Signalize Signal 45.9 D Bold indicates LOS standard exceeded Note 1: OVFL represents overflow conditions where delays per vehicles exceed 200 sec/veh and cannot be accurately estimated. Source: LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Rai/yard.x/s TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS 2690 Lake Forest Road, Suite C P.O. Box 5875 Tahoe City, California 96145 (530) 583-4053 FAX: (530) 583-5966 EMAIL: info@lsctahoe.com www.lsctahoe.com MEMORANDUM: DISCUSSION OF TRAFFIC IMPACT OF TRUCKEE RAILYARD PROJECT WITH EASTERN UNDERCROSSING July 17, 2008 The purpose of this memorandum is to present an evaluation of the impacts of the proposed Truckee Railyard project on traffic conditions assuming the provision of an "Eastern Undercrossing" of the Union Pacific Railroad tracks. The location of the undercrossing is assumed to be approximately 2,000 feet east of Bridge Street. This undercrossing is assumed to consist of one lane in each direction between Donner Pass Road and East River Street, with no additional turn lanes and Stop sign control on the undercrossing at either end. Note that this scenario does not assume a new crossing of the Truckee River. This analysis assumes full buildout of the Railyard project as well as the other sources of growth in traffic by 2025, as reflected in the Truckee General Plan and the Martis Valley General Plan (the latter adjusted to reflect recent reductions in permitted land use). Table A presents the 2025 traffic volumes with full buildout and the Eastern Undercrossing. Note that this does not assume presence of a train (which is addressed in a separate memo). These volumes reflect the diversion of both Railyard traffic as well as other through traffic (such as travel between Glenshire Drive and Brockway Road). Level Of Service was evaluated using the Synchro/Simtraffic software package for the Bridge / Donner Pass Road and Bridge / West River Street intersection, and using the Traffix software for the remainder of the potentially impacted intersections. The results of these analyses assuming no changes from the existing or base intersection configurations are shown in Table B. As indicated, all intersections would operate at acceptable (E or better) LOS, with the exception of Bridge / DPR, Bridge / West River Street, and West River Street / Mciver Undercrossing. As shown in Table C, providing a single lane roundabout at West River Street / Mciver Undercrossing would provide adequate LOS at this intersection (the same mitigation identified for the scenario without the Eastern Undercrossing). At the two Bridge Street intersections, signals were assumed as well as the maximum potential intersection Traffic Impacts of Eastern Undercrossing Page 2 July 17, 2008 configuration. Again, this is the same condition identified for the scenario without the Eastern Undercrossing. Conclusions The conclusions of this analysis with the Eastern Undercrossing are as follows: D Both of the key intersections on Bridge Street (at Donner Pass Road and at East/West River Street) would fail (provide LOS F conditions). At Bridge / DPR, average delay would be improved from the "no Eastern Undercrossing" condition, but would still result in average delays exceeding 2 minutes. Delays at BridgelWest River Street / East River Street would still remain over 200 seconds. In effect, the Eastern Undercrossing would largely shift southbound through movements on Bridge Street at this intersection to westbound left turn movements, with little net change in signal operations. D Both intersections at the end of the Eastern Undercrossing (at Donner Pass Road Extension and at East River Street) would operate at good LOS with Stop sign control. D The roundabout at Mciver Crossing / West River Street needed to provide adequate LOS without the Eastern Undercrossing would still be needed with the Eastern Undercrossing. D LOS at the intersections at either end of Mciver Crossing and at the DPRIDPR Extension intersection would not be noticeably changed by provision of the Eastern Undercrossing. D All roadway segments would operate within capacity with the Eastern Undercrossing. D The Eastern Undercrossing would increase the total two-way peak-hour traffic volume on East River Street between Bridge Street and the Eastern Undercrossing by 249 vehicles (from 154 to 403). This would not result in any traffic congestion problems, but would increase traffic noise along this roadway. In summary, an Eastern Undercrossing tying DPR Extension with East River Street would not create any new traffic capacity or LOS issues, but it would also not solve the key traffic issues along Bridge Street. TABLE B: Truckee Railyard Plus Project 2025 PM Peak Hour LOS with Eastern Undercrossing Total Intersection Worst Movement Delay I Delay I Intersection Control Type sec/veh LOS sec/veh LOS 2 West River Street / Mciver Crossing Unsignalized 64.4 F OVFL F Roundabout3 Donner Pass Road / Mciver Crossing 6.9 A 12.0 B 7 Donner Pass Road / Bridge Street OVFL F OVFL FUnsignalized 8 Bridge Street / Church Street 21.7 C 19 Bridge Street / West River Street Unsignalized 4.2 A Unsignalized OVFL F OVFL F 26 Donner Pass Road / Donner Pass Road Extension Unsignalized 9 A 9.2 A 29 Donner Pass Road Extension / Eastern Undercrossing Unsignalized 2.1 A 5.6 A 30 East River Street / Eastern Undercrossing 1.9 AUnsignalized 3.3 A Bold indicates LOS standard exceeded Note 1: OVFL represents overflow conditions where delays per vehicles exceed 200 sec/veh and cannot be accurately estimated. Source: LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. TABLE C: Truckee Railyard Plus Project 2025 PM Peak Hour LOS with Eastern Undercrossing Unmitigated Mitigated Total Intersection Worst Movement Total Intersection Worst Movement Delay Delay Delay Delay Intersection Control Type sec/veh LOS sec/veh LOS Mitigation Control Type sec/veh LOS sec/veh LOS WB Left Turn pocket 2 West River Street / Unsignalized replaced with Two Way Unsignalized64.4 F OVFL F 6.2 A 12.5 BMciver Crossing LT Lane 7 Donner Pass Road / Signalize, add NBL andUnsignalized SignalOVFL F OVFL F 141.3 F --Bridge Street SBR lanes 19 Bridge Street / West Unsignalized Signalize SignalF OVFLOVFL F OVFL F --River Street Bold indicates LOS standard exceeded Note 1: OVFL represents overflow conditions where delays per vehicles exceed 200 sec/veh and cannot be accurately estimated. Source: LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Railyard.xls TABLE A: 2025 Plus Project PM Peak-Hour Intersection Volumes I NB I SB I EB I WB I I North I South I East I West II Left I Thru I Right I Left I Thru I Right I Left I Thru I Right I Left I Thru I Right I I In lOut I In lOut I In lOut I In lOut I 2 West River Street I Mciver Crossing 3 9 9 196 9 114 211 383 4 8 321 78 319 298 21 21 407 588 598 438 3 Donner Pass Road I Mciver Crossing 86 546 0 0 440 234 147 0 150 0 0 0 674 693 632 590 0 0 297 320 7 Donner Pass Road I Bridge Street 279 411 170 36 321 85 67 56 251 104 142 8 442 486 860 676 254 262 374 506 8 Bridge Street I Church Street 0 298 63 68 368 0 19 7 13 69 0 59 436 376 361 450 128 138 39 0 19 Bridge Street I West River Street 322 617 108 29 555 91 197 39 379 132 47 48 675 862 1047 1066 227 176 615 460 26 DPR I DPR Extension 17 3 12 0 17 50 165 123 20 4 82 20 67 188 32 41 106 135 308 149 29 DPR Extension I Eastern Under Xing 24 13 72 0 23 3 9 116 46 75 30 0 26 22 109 144 105 188 171 57 30 East River St I Eastern Under Xing 0 0 0 1 0 143 107 65 0 0 88 1 144 108 0 0 89 66 172 231 TABLE D: 2025 Plus Project Roadway LOS 2025 Summer PM Peak Hour Plus Project Conditions Max Allowable Peak· Hour Volume per Lane to Obtain LOS Threshold 1,600 1,600 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,600 1,200 Peak-Hour Two Way Volume 1,367 1,537 880 1,222 516 241 1,075 252 403 Peak-Hour Peak- Direction Volume 693 862 506 632 262 135 615 144 227 LOS Threshold Exceeded? No No No No No No No No No Roadway Segments Mciver Undercrossing Bridge Street Across UPRR DPR -Bridge St. to Spring Street Donner Pass Road -Spring St to Mciver UC DPR Extension -Bridge Street to DPR DPR Extension -DPR to Eastern UC West River St -Bridge St. to Mciver UC Eastern Undercrossing East River Street -Bridge Street to Eastern UC LOS Classification Threshold Minor Arterial E Minor Arterial E Minor Arterial E Minor Arterial E Minor Arterial c: L Minor Arterial E Minor Arterial E Minor Arterial E Minor Arterial c: L TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING & TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS 2690 Lake Forest Road, Suite C P.O. Box 5875 Tahoe City, California 96145 (530) 583-4053 FAX: (530) 583-5966 EMAIL: info@lsctahoe.com www.lsctahoe.com MEMORANDUM: DISCUSSION OF TRAFFIC IMPACT OF 1·WAY WESTBOUND OPERATION OF EAST JIBBOOM STREET BETWEEN KEISER AVENUE AND BRIDGE STREET July 30,2008 The purpose of this memorandum is to present an evaluation of the traffic impacts and roadway requirements associated with the potential conversion of East Jibboom Street between Keiser Avenue and Bridge Street to one-way westbound operation. The intent of this one-way designation would be to provide a sidewalk along one side of this constrained roadway section. This analysis is considered for four development conditions: 1. 2008 Without Railyard Project 2. 2008 With Railyard Project 3. 2025 Without Railyard Project 4. 2025 With Railyard Project LOS and potential mitigation measures are evaluated at the following intersections: • Bridge / Church Street • Bridge / Donner Pass Road • Donner Pass Road / Donner Pass Road Extension • Donner Pass Road / Church Street This analysis assumes full buildout of the Railyard project (for both 2008 and 2025) as well as the other sources of growth in traffic by 2025, as reflected in the Truckee General Plan and the Martis Valley General Plan (the latter adjusted to reflect recent reductions in permitted land use). TRAFFIC VOLUMES The bases for the analysis are the traffic volume forecasts presented in the Railyard DEIR. Diversion of traffic volumes was evaluated based upon the relative travel time associated with potential alternate routes, as well as the overall traffic patterns in the area. The net impact of the 1-way closure is shown in Table A. Adding these impacts Traffic Conditions With Jibboom Street Page 2 July 30, 2008 One-Way Westbound to the base conditions yields the total traffic volumes with the 1-way designation, as shown in Table B. INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE Unmitigated Level Of Service (LOS) was evaluated using the Synchro/Simtraffic software package for the Bridge / Donner Pass Road and Bridge / West River Street intersection, and using the Traffix software for the remainder of the potentially impacted intersections. The results of these analyses assuming no changes from the existing or base intersection configurations ("unmitigated") are shown in Table C. As indicated, in 2008 conditions, both the Donner Pass Road/Bridge and Donner Pass Road/Church intersections would not attain LOS standards, either with no Railyard development or with full Railyard development. In 2025, the Bridge/Church intersection also does not attain LOS standard under either project condition (as well s the Donner Pass Road/Bridge and Donner Pass Road/Church intersections). In either 2008 or 2025, adequate LOS is provided at the Donner Pass Road / Donner Pass Road Extension intersection. Mitigated The intersection improvements needed to mitigate to an adequate LOS are shown in Table D: • At Donner Pass Road / Bridge Street in 2008, providing a signal and expanding the intersection to provide a northbound left turn lane, a southbound right turn lane, and a westbound right turn lane provides adequate LOS, either with or without the Railyard Project. Even with the maximum feasible improvements, in 2025 LOS F conditions would be provided. • At Donner Pass Road / Church Street in 2025 under "no Railyard" conditions, a two-way left turn lane along Donner Pass Road and Stop sign control on the Church Street intersections would provide adequate LOS. With the addition of Railyard traffic, however, the two-way left turn lane would not provide adequate LOS, and a single lane roundabout would be necessary. (This roundabout was evaluated at a relatively small inscribed diameter of 110 feet.) This roundabout is needed under either no Railyard or full Railyard conditions in 2025. • At Bridge Street / Church Street in 2025 (under either no Railyard or full Railyard scenarios), existing traffic control (Stop signs on the Church Street and alley approaches) would not provide adequate LOS, given the combination of increased through traffic along Bridge Street (generated in part by the Bridge Street extension to the Third Tahoe Donner connector) and the increased southbound left turn volume generated by the one-way closure on Jibboom Street. Simply providing a southbound left turn lane was also found to not attain LOS standards (under either development scenario). To attain standards, a four Traffic Conditions With Jibboom Street Page 3 July 3D} 2008 One-Way Westbound way stop would be required, along with separate southbound left turn and through lanes. While this would provide reasonable (LOS C) overall traffic delays, northbound queues from this intersection would at times form back into the Donner Pass Road / Bridge Street intersection, adding to the (already bad) traffic delays at the latter intersection. This condition would occur approximately 10 percent of the time during the 2025 peak hour without the Railyard project, and 25 with the full Railyard development. In comparing these mitigation measures with the base Railyard analysis, the LOS levels and required mitigation measures at Donner Pass Road / Bridge Street are unchanged under any of the Railyard development scenarios. At Donner Pass Road / Church Street, the one-way Jibboom operation triggers the need for a roundabout under 2008 plus Railyard, 2025 no Railyard, and 2025 plus Railyard scenarios. At Bridge Street / Church Street, the one-way Jibboom operation does not require changes in 2008, but triggers the need for a separate southbound left turn lane and four-way Stop operation in 2025 (either with or without the Railyard project). Conclusions The conclusions of this analysis assuming one-way westbound operation of Jibboom Street are as follows: • With the one-way designation in 2008, a single-lane roundabout would be necessary at Donner Pass Road / Church Street assuming full buildout of the Railyard, but a two-way left-turn lane would prove adequate without Railyard development. Either with or without the Railyard project, making Jibboom Street one-way westbound only would require a roundabout at the Donner Pass Road / Church Street intersection by 2025. • While not an issue in 2008 (either with or without the Railyard), by 2025 the Bridge Street / Church Street intersection would fail assuming 1-way westbound operation of Jibboom Street, resulting in very long delays for southbound left turn movements in particular. While adequate LOS at this intersection could be provided by a four-way Stop control and a separate southbound left turn lane, this would result in traffic queues forming back into the Donner Pass Road / Bridge Street intersections at peak times (at a higher frequency with Railyard development). In summary, closing Jibboom Street east of Bridge Street to eastbound traffic would (in the long term) create traffic issues along Church Street that would "spill over" to Donner Pass Road. This condition occurs with or without Railyard development, but is worsened by the addition of Railyard traffic. A decision regarding one-way closure should be made prior to development of final plans for the Railyard project, to avoid Railyard plans that preclude potential provision of a roundabout at Donner Pass Road / Church Street (relocated), as this roundabout would only be necessary if Jibboom Street is converted to one-way. TABLE A: Impact of 1-Way Jibboom Street on Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes I I Left NB I I Thru I Right I Left SB I EB I I Thru I Right I Left I Thru I Right I Left WB I I I Thru I Right I I North I In lOut I South I In lOut I East I In lOut I West I In lOut I 2008 No Project Donner Pass Road I Bridge Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 28 0 Bridge Street I Church Street 0 -11 11 107 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 107 -11 0 0 0 118 0 0 Bridge Stl Jibboom Street-High Street 0 0 -23 -11 11 0 0 -112 84 0 0 0 0 0 -23 95 0 -146 -28 0 Donner Pass Road I Church Street 0 28 0 0 0 0 118 0 0 0 0 0 0 146 28 0 0 0 118 0 DPR I DPR Extension 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2008 Plus Project Donner Pass Road I Bridge Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 28 0 Bridge Street I Church Street 0 -11 11 107 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 107 -11 0 0 0 118 0 0 Bridge Stl Jibboom Street-High Street 0 0 -23 -11 11 0 0 -112 84 0 0 0 0 0 -23 95 0 -146 -28 0 Donner Pass Road I Church Street 0 28 0 0 0 0 118 0 0 0 0 0 0 146 28 0 0 0 118 0 DPR I DPR Extension 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 0 0 28 0 2025 No Project Donner Pass Road I Bridge Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bridge Street I Church Street 0 -31 31 316 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 316 -31 0 0 0 347 0 0 Bridge Stl Jibboom Street-High Street 0 0 -62 -27 27 0 0 -258 258 0 0 0 0 0 -62 285 0 -347 0 0 Donner Pass Road I Church Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 347 0 0 0 0 0 0 347 0 0 0 0 347 0 DPR I DPR Extension 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2025 Plus Project Donner Pass Road I Bridge Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bridge Street I Church Street 0 -31 31 258 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 258 -31 0 0 0 289 0 0 Bridge Stl Jibboom Street-High Street 0 0 -62 -27 27 0 0 -200 200 0 0 0 0 0 -62 227 0 -289 0 0 Donner Pass Road I Church Street 0 0 0 0 0 0 289 0 0 0 0 0 0 289 0 0 0 0 289 0 DPR I DPR Extension 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TABLE B: Total Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes With 1-Way Jibboom Street I NB I SB I EB I WB I I North I South I East I West I I Left I Thru I Right I Left I Thru I Right I Left I Thru I Right I Left I Thru I Right I I In lOut I In lOut I In lOut I In lOut I 2008 No Project Donner Pass Road / Bridge Street 241 119 244 13 96 22 37 267 271 213 110 5 131 161 604 580 328 524 575 373 Bridge Street / Church Street 0 130 29 120 106 0 15 5 10 15 0 68 226 213 159 131 83 154 30 0 Bridge St/ Jibboom Street-High Street 189 11 0 0 23 4 1 0 184 12 44 8 27 20 200 219 64 0 185 237 Donner Pass Road / Church Street 17 519 7 26 320 37 143 5 8 42 38 64 383 726 543 370 144 38 156 92 2008 Plus Project Donner Pass Road / Bridge Street 241 169 310 13 157 51 56 326 271 278 158 5 221 230 720 706 441 649 653 450 Bridge Street / Church Street 0 130 97 122 106 0 15 5 10 105 0 70 228 215 227 221 175 224 30 0 Bridge St/ Jibboom Street-High Street 191 11 0 0 23 4 1 0 186 12 44 8 27 20 202 221 64 0 187 239 Donner Pass Road / Church Street 17 347 7 91 181 37 143 75 8 46 130 151 309 641 371 235 327 173 226 184 DPR / DPR Extension 15 12 1 0 17 217 341 268 19 1 226 0 234 353 28 37 227 269 628 458 2025 No Project Donner Pass Road / Bridge Street 279 399 97 31 334 71 60 41 251 101 139 6 436 465 775 686 246 169 352 489 Bridge Street / Church Street 0 265 75 355 393 0 19 7 13 69 0 24 748 308 340 475 93 437 39 0 Bridge St/ Jibboom Street-High Street 3 306 0 0 277 116 176 0 394 41 115 36 393 518 309 712 192 0 570 234 Donner Pass Road / Church Street 27 151 0 24 112 16 366 36 8 14 44 66 152 583 178 134 124 60 410 87 2025 Plus Project Donner Pass Road / Bridge Street 279 463 226 36 413 90 72 57 251 156 144 8 539 543 968 820 308 319 380 513 Bridge Street / Church Street 0 267 152 323 368 0 19 7 13 166 0 56 691 342 419 547 222 482 39 0 Bridge St/ Jibboom Street-High Street 12 332 0 0 302 116 176 0 343 41 136 36 418 544 344 686 213 0 519 264 Donner Pass Road / Church Street 34 73 0 81 62 16 313 134 8 18 167 140 159 526 107 88 325 215 455 217 DPR / DPR Extension 8 3 1 0 16 50 165 178 21 1 144 20 66 188 12 38 165 179 364 202 TABLE C: Downtown Truckee Unmitigated Intersection LOS with Jibboom St One Way Westbound Between Keiser Avenue and Bridge Street Worst Movement Delay Total Intersection Delay Intersection Control Type sec/veh I LOS sec/veh I LOS 2008 No Railyard 7 Donner Pass Road / Bridge Street Unsignalized 41.8 E 98.2 F 8 Bridge Street / Church Street Unsignalized 5.0 A 14.4 B 10 Donner Pass Road / Church Street Unsignalized 20.9 C 135.4 F 2008 Plus Full Railyard Development 7 Donner Pass Road / Bridge Street OVFL F OVFL F 8 Bridge Street / Church Street Unsignalized Unsignalized 6.4 A 16.2 C 10 Donner Pass Road / Church Street Unsignalized 93.9 F OVFL F 26 DPR / DPR Extension Unsignalized 14.4 B 18.2 C 2025 No Railyard 7 Donner Pass Road / Bridge Street 151.1 F OVFL F 8 Bridge Street / Church Street Unsignalized 22.4 C OVFL F 10 Donner Pass Road / Church Street Unsignalized Unsignalized 32.8 D 64.6 F 2025 Plus Full Railyard Development 7 Donner Pass Road / Bridge Street OVFL F OVFL F 8 Bridge Street / Church Street Unsignalized Unsignalized 129.4 F OVFL F 10 Donner Pass Road / Church Street Unsignalized 135.9 F OVFL F 26 DPR / DPR Extension Unsignalized 9.4 A 9.6 A Bold indicates LOS standard exceeded OVFL represents overflow conditions where delays per vehicles exceed 200 sec/veh and cannot be accurately estimated. Source: LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Rai/yard.xls - - -- TABLE D: Downtown Truckee Mitigated Intersection LOS with Jibboom St One Way Westbound Between Keiser Avenue and Bridge Street Unmitigated Mitigated Total Intersection Worst Movement Total Intersection Worst Movement Delay Delay Delay Delay Intersection Control Type sec/veh LOS sec/veh LOS Mitigation Control Type sec/veh LOS sec/veh LOS 2008 No Railyard Unsignalized7 Donner Pass Road / Bridge Street 41.8 E 98.2 F Signalize, add NBL, SBR, WBR lane Signal 47.1 C 10 Donner Pass Road / Church Street Unsignalized 20.9 C Unsignalized135.4 F TWLTL 5.9 A 28 0 RoundaboutSingle Lane Roundabout 11.8 B 38.2 E 2008 Plus Full Railyard Development 7 Donner Pass Road / Bridge Street Unsignalized SignalOVFL F Signalize, add NBL, SBR, WBR lane OVFL F 65.1 c L.. - 10 Donner Pass Road / Church Street Unsignalized Single Lane Roundabout Roundabout93.9 F OVFL F 13.2 B 28.2 0 2025 No Railyard 7 Donner Pass Road / Bridge Street 0 Unsignalized SignalOVFL F Signalize, add NBL, SBR, WBR lane 151.1 F 128.2 F Four way stop. Separate SBL and SBT 8 Bridge Street / Church Street 0 Unsignalized Unsignalized22.4 C OVFL F 14.6 B 16.1 Clanes. 10 Donner Pass Road / Church Street 0 Unsignalized RoundaboutSingle Lane Roundabout 32.8 0 64.6 F 21.4 C 35.8 E 2025 Plus Full Railyard Development 7 Donner Pass Road / Bridge Street Unsignalized OVFL F OVFL F Signalize, add NBL, SBR, WBR lane Signal OVFL F -- 8 Bridge Street / Church Street Unsignalized 129.4 F OVFL F Four way stop. Separate SBL and SBT lanes. Unsignalized 17.8 C 19.2 C 10 Donner Pass Road / Church Street Unsignalized 135.9 F OVFL F Single Lane Roundabout Roundabout 18.9 C 28.9 0 Bold indicates LOS standard exceeded OVFL represents overflow conditions where delays per vehicles exceed 200 sec/veh and cannot be accurately estimated. Source: LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc. Railyard.xls 2008 No Project Existing Summer No Project Tue Mar 25, 2008 16:08:44 Page 6-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 SR 89 South/West River Street ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): Optimal Cycle: 60 Level Of Service: ******************************************************************************** 0.492 12.9 B Street Name: SR 89 Approach: North Bound Movement: L - T - R L II Control: Rights: Min. Green: Lanes: Protected Include 0 0 0 0 2 0 South Bound West River Street East Bound - T - R L - T - R II Protected Include 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 637 169 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 637 169 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 671 178 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 671 178 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 671 178 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.95 Lanes: 0.00 2.00 Final Sat.: 0 3610 II II Protected Include 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 II West Bound L - T - R II Protected Ovl 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 II 236 522 0 0 0 0 120 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 236 522 0 0 0 0 120 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 248 549 0 0 0 0 126 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 248 549 0 0 0 0 126 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 248 549 0 0 0 0 126 0 II II 1900 1900 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 1615 1805 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.19 0.11 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.38 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.49 Delay/Veh: 0.0 14.5 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 14.5 LOS by Move: A B HCM2kAvgQ: 0 5 ******************************************************************************** **** II 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1900 0 0 0 0 1805 0 II II 285 1.00 285 1.00 0.95 300 0 300 1.00 1.00 300 1900 0.85 1.00 1615 0.14 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.19 **** **** 0.38 0.28 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.42 0.29 0.49 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.00 0.44 13.3 18.8 5.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.2 0.0 12.8 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 13.3 18.8 5.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.2 0.0 12.8 B B A A A A A C A B 2 4 5 0 0 0 0 3 0 4 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER Exisitng Summer No Project Tue Mar 25, 2008 16:08:44 Page 7-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 West River/McIver Crossing ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 11.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: E[ 39.0] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Approach: Movement: McIver Crossing North Bound South Bound L - T - R L - T - R II Control: Stop Sign Rights: Include Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 I II Volume Module: Base Vol: 5 3 11 177 8 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 5 3 11 177 8 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 5 3 12 186 8 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 5 3 12 186 8 I II Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 II Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 1007 Potent Cap.: 221 Move Cap.: 164 Volume/Cap: 0.03 Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx LOS by Move: Movement: LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx 319 xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx 0.2 xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx 17.0 xxxxx Shared LOS: * C ApproachDel: 17.0 ApproachLOS: C ******************************************************************************** II Stop Sign Include 0 1 0 0 1 II 1016 240 216 0.01 320 867 865 725 275 294 725 247 264 0.02 0.75 0.03 II XXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXX * * * LT - LTR 248 xxxx 5.8 xxxx 57.6 xxxx F 39.0 E West River East Bound West Bound L - T - R L - T - R Uncontrolled Include 1 0 0 1 0 II I Uncontrolled Include 1 0 1 0 1 II I 123 101 299 10 5 301 148 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 123 101 299 10 5 301 148 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 129 106 315 11 5 317 156 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 129 106 315 11 5 317 156 II II 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx II II I 317 473 728 1100 728 1100 0.18 0.10 II XXXX xxxx xxxx XXXX XXXXX xxxxx XXXXX XXXX 0.6 0.3 xxxx xxxxx 11.0 8.6 xxxx xxxxx B A - RT LT - LTR - RT 325 1246 1246 0.00 XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXX II I 0.0 xxxx 7.9 xxxx A LT - LTR XXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXX xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx * * * XXXXXX * * * XXXXX XXXXX * - RT XXXXX xxxxx XXXX XXXXX * * XXXXXX * Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER Movement Summary DPR/ McIver 2008 Summer PM Pk No Project Roundabout Vehicle Movements 95% Mov Dem Deg of Aver Level Back ID Turn Flow %HV Satn Delay of of (veh/h) (v/c) (sec) Service Queue (ft) Prop. Eff. Stop Queued Rate Aver Speed (mph) DPR 3L L 93 2.1 0.734 12.0 LOS B 276 0.78 0.70 25.7 8T T 695 2.0 0.733 7.8 LOS A 276 0.78 0.65 28.4 Approach 789 2.0 0.733 8.3 LOS A 276 0.78 0.65 28.1 DPR 4T T 718 1.9 0.740 6.5 LOS A 208 0.43 0.51 32.0 4R R 244 2.0 0.739 6.6 LOS A 208 0.43 0.53 31.2 Approach 962 2.0 0.740 6.5 LOS A 208 0.43 0.52 31.8 Mc Iver 5L L 167 1.8 0.453 15.9 LOS B 98 0.81 0.99 20.8 2R R 109 1.8 0.452 10.2 LOS B 98 0.81 0.94 21.6 Approach 276 1.8 0.453 13.6 LOS B 98 0.81 0.97 21.1 All Vehicles 2027 2.0 0.740 8.2 LOS A 276 0.62 0.63 28.3 Exisitng Summer No Project Tue Mar 25, 2008 16:08:44 Page 9-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 DPR/I80 Central WB off Ramp ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 4.6 Worst Case Level Of Service: D[ 29.5] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Channel Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 746 0 0 664 0 0 0 0 54 0 208 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 746 0 0 664 0 0 0 0 54 0 208 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 785 0 0 699 0 0 0 0 57 0 219 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 785 0 0 699 0 0 0 0 57 0 219 I II II II I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 I II II II Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1484 xxxx 785 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 139 xxxx 396 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 139 xxxx 396 Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.41 xxxx 0.55 I II II II I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1.8 xxxx 3.2 Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 47.8 xxxx 24.8 LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * E * C Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 29.5 ApproachLOS: * * * D ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER Shared LOS: ApproachDel: ApproachLOS: ******************************************************************************** Exisitng Summer No Project Tue Mar 25, 2008 16:08:44 Page 10-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 I-80 BB / DPR Central / High St ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 2.9 Worst Case Level Of Service: E[ 37.2] ******************************************************************************** Approach: Movement: Control: Rights: Lanes: North Bound South Bound L - T - R L - T - R II Uncontrolled Include 0 0 0 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 771 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 771 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 812 Reduct Vol: 0 FinalVolume: 0 20 1.00 20 1.00 0.95 21 East Bound West Bound L - T - R L - T - R II II I Uncontrolled Include 0 1 0 0 0 II II 21 1.00 21 1.00 0.95 22 752 1.00 752 1.00 0.95 792 0 0 0 0 812 21 22 792 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx Move Cap.: xxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx II Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: Movement: xxxx XXXX xxxx XXXX II XXXXX 4.1 xxxxx 2.2 II XXXXX XXXXX xxxxx XXXX * * * LT - LTR - RT 833 809 809 0.03 xxxx XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Stop Sign Include 0 0 1! 0 0 II Stop Sign Include 0 0 1! 0 0 0 10 0 126 6 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 10 0 126 6 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0 11 0 133 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 133 6 II II XXXXX 7.1 XXXXX 3.5 II XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXX II 0 19 1.00 1.00 0 19 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0 20 0 0 0 20 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 II 1668 1668 792 1724 1658 77 97 392 71 99 72 95 392 46 96 0.15 0.00 0.34 0.14 0.00 II 822 377 377 0.05 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 9.6 A LT - LTR - RT LT - xxxx * XXXXX XXXXX * * Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 9.6 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx * * * A * * * xxxxxx * xxxxxx * XXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXXX * * * * * LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT 295 xxxxx xxxx 138 xxxxx 2.5 xxxxx xxxxx 0.7 xxxxx 28.1 xxxxx xxxxx 37.2 xxxxx D * * E 28.1 37.2 D E Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER Critical Gp: 7.1 FollowUpTim: 3.5 Exisitng Summer No Project Tue Mar 25, 2008 16:08:44 Page 11-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 DPR/Spring ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 5.5 Worst Case Level Of Service: F[ 77.6] ******************************************************************************** Approach: Movement: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Stop Sign Rights: Include Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 II Volume Module: Base Vol: 3 Growth Adj: 1.00 Initial Bse: 3 User Adj: 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 PHF Volume: 3 Reduct Vol: 0 FinalVolume: 3 II II Stop Sign Include 0 0 1! 0 0 II 2 0 17 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2 0 17 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 2 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 18 0 Critical Gap Module: 6.5 4.0 Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 1628 Potent Cap.: 83 Move Cap.: 44 Volume/Cap: 0.07 1538 117 84 0.03 203 1.00 203 1.00 0.95 214 0 214 II II XXXXX XXXXX II XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXX Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx LOS by Move: Movement: Shared Cap.: xxxx SharedQueue: xxxx Shrd ConDel: xxxx Shared LOS: ApproachDel: 77.6 ApproachLOS: F * * LT - LTR 55 0.3 77.6 F XXXXX XXXXX * - RT XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX xxxxx * * Uncontrolled Include 0 1 0 0 0 II I Uncontrolled Include 0 1 0 0 1 II I 263 554 0 0 350 31 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 263 554 0 0 350 31 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 277 583 0 0 368 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 277 583 0 0 368 33 II 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx II II I 1506 100 77 0.23 1505 368 401 122 682 1169 88 682 1169 0.00 0.31 0.24 II II XXXX xxxx xxxxx XXXXX xxxx xxxxx * * * LT - LTR - RT XXXX 425 xxxxx XXXXX 3.2 xxxxx 23.2 xxxxx C 23.2 C * XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXX 0.9 xxxx 9.0 xxxx A LT - LTR XXXX xxxx 0.9 xxxx 9.0 xxxx A xxxxxx * II XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXX xxxxx XXXXX xxxxx xxxx xxxxx * * * * - RT LT - LTR - RT XXXXX xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 9.0 xxxx xxxxx * A xxxxxx * * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER Exisitng Summer No Project Tue Mar 25, 2008 16:08:44 Page 12-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report Unknown Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 DPR/Bridge Street ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: ******************************************************************************** 0.000 0.0 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Protected Protected Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 241 119 244 13 96 22 37 239 271 213 110 5 Sim Traffic Simulation Averages DPR / Bridge EBT All Delay / Veh (s) 97.5 37.4 78 32.2 62.8 23.5 102.8 42.1 55.7 23.6 Average 79.36 31.76 Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER MITIG8 - 2008 No Project Fri May 16, 2008 10:35:46 Page 1-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #8 Bridge and Church ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 5.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 13.7] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 141 18 13 106 0 15 5 10 35 0 15 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 141 18 13 106 0 15 5 10 35 0 15 Added Vol: 0 2 65 31 6 0 0 0 0 86 0 36 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 143 83 44 112 0 15 5 10 121 0 51 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 151 87 46 118 0 16 5 11 127 0 54 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 151 87 46 118 0 16 5 11 127 0 54 I II II II I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 I II II II I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 238 xxxx xxxxx 432 448 118 413 405 194 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1341 xxxx xxxxx 538 509 939 553 538 852 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1341 xxxx xxxxx 490 491 939 528 519 852 Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.03 xxxx xxxx 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.24 0.00 0.06 I II II II I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * A * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 583 xxxxx xxxx 595 xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.2 xxxxx xxxxx 1.3 xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 11.5 xxxxx xxxxx 13.7 xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * A * * * B * * B * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 11.5 13.7 ApproachLOS: * * B B ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER Exisitng Summer No Project Tue Mar 25, 2008 16:08:44 Page 14-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #9 Jiboom and Bridge ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 4.6 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 12.3] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 156 0 0 11 12 4 1 112 100 8 77 12 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 156 0 0 11 12 4 1 112 100 8 77 12 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 164 0 0 12 13 4 1 118 105 8 81 13 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 164 0 0 12 13 4 1 118 105 8 81 13 I II II II Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 7.1 xxxx xxxxx 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx I II II II I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 285 xxxx xxxxx 277 329 87 94 xxxx xxxxx 223 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 671 xxxx xxxxx 680 593 977 1513 xxxx xxxxx 1358 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 654 xxxx xxxxx 676 589 977 1513 xxxx xxxxx 1358 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.25 xxxx xxxx 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 xxxx xxxx 0.01 xxxx xxxx I II II II I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 1.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 12.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.4 xxxx xxxxx 7.7 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: B * * * * * A * * A * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 663 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 10.7 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * B * * * * * * * ApproachDel: 12.3 10.7 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: B B * * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER Exisitng Summer No Project Tue Sep 23, 2008 16:08:44 Page 15-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #10 DPR/ Church ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 4.9 Worst Case Level Of Service: D[ 27.2] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: DPR Church Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 I II II II Volume Module: Base Vol: 17 490 7 26 320 37 25 5 8 42 38 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 17 490 7 26 320 37 25 5 8 42 38 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 18 516 7 27 337 39 26 5 8 44 40 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 18 516 7 27 337 39 26 5 8 44 40 Stop Sign Include 0 0 1! 0 0 II II Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx I II Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 376 xxxx xxxxx 523 Potent Cap.: 1194 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 1194 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.01 xxxx xxxx I II Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 8.1 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A Movement: LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx II Shared LOS: ApproachDel: ApproachLOS: ******************************************************************************** * * XXXXXX * * 1054 1054 0.03 XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXX II 64 1.00 64 1.00 0.95 67 0 67 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 II 1020 217 161 0.16 II 970 255 245 0.02 356 973 986 519 692 233 250 560 692 220 240 560 0.01 0.20 0.17 0.12 II 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx A * * * * * * * * LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 203 xxxxx xxxx 310 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.7 xxxxx xxxxx 2.5 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 27.0 xxxxx xxxxx 27.2 XXXXXX * 27.0 27.2 D D - RT XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX * Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER Exisitng Summer No Project Tue Mar 25, 2008 16:08:45 Page 16-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #11 DPR / Keiser ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 3.9 Worst Case Level Of Service: D[ 34.0] ******************************************************************************** Approach: Movement: North Bound South Bound East Bound L - T - R L - T - R L - T - West Bound R L - T - R II II II Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 I II II II Volume Module: Base Vol: 1 579 0 0 382 55 130 0 1 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 1 579 0 0 382 55 130 0 1 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 1 609 0 0 402 58 137 0 1 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 1 609 0 0 402 58 137 0 1 I II II II Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 FollowUpTim: 2.2 Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 460 Potent Cap.: 1112 Move Cap.: 1112 Volume/Cap: 0.00 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 6.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 II II XXXX xxxx XXXX xxxx XXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXX xxxx xxxx Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: Control Del: LOS by Move: Movement: Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx SharedQueue: 0.0 xxxx Shrd ConDel: 8.2 xxxx Shared LOS: ApproachDel: ApproachLOS: ******************************************************************************** A XXXXXX * 0.0 xxxx 8.2 xxxx A II XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXX * * Stop Sign Include 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 0 0 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.00 0 1.00 0.95 0 0 0 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx II 1043 1043 431 256 231 629 256 231 629 0.53 0.00 0.00 II II XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXXX * * * * * * * * LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT XXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX * * XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXX * XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX LT - LTR xxxx 257 XXXXX 2.9 xxxxx 34.0 * * D 34.0 D - RT XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX LT - LTR - RT XXXX xxxx xxxxx XXXXX xxxx xxxxx XXXXX xxxx xxxxx * * * XXXXXX * * Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER Exisitng Summer No Project Tue Mar 25, 2008 16:08:45 Page 17-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #12 DPR/Glenshire Drive ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 9.4 Worst Case Level Of Service: D[ 34.2] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 176 0 181 0 0 0 0 324 385 238 261 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 176 0 181 0 0 0 0 324 385 238 261 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 185 0 191 0 0 0 0 341 405 251 275 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 185 0 191 0 0 0 0 341 405 251 275 0 I II II II I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 6.4 xxxx 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx I II II II I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 1319 xxxx 544 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 746 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 175 xxxx 543 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 871 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 136 xxxx 543 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 871 xxxx xxxxx Total Cap: 246 217 xxxxx 0 134 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.75 xxxx 0.35 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx •xxxx 0.29 xxxx xxxx I II II II I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 5.4 xxxx 1.6 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1.2 xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 53.8 xxxx 15.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 10.8 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: F * C * * * * * * B * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: 34.2 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: D * * * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** * Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER Exisitng Summer No Project Tue Mar 25, 2008 16:08:45 Page 18-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #13 I-80 EB/DPR Eastern ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 5.7 Worst Case Level Of Service: C[ 21.6] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: DPR I-80 EB Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 505 0 0 355 0 163 0 144 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 505 0 0 355 0 163 0 144 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 532 0 0 374 0 172 0 152 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 532 0 0 374 0 172 0 152 0 0 0 I II II II I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx I II II II I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 905 xxxx 374 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 309 xxxx 677 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 309 xxxx 677 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.55 xxxx 0.22 xxxx xxxx xxxx I II II II I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.2 xxxx 0.9 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 30.2 xxxx 11.8 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * D * B * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 21.6 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * C * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER Exisitng Summer No Project Tue Mar 25, 2008 16:08:45 Page 19-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #14 I-80 WB/DPR Eastern ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.8 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.0] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: DPR I-80 WB Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 102 566 0 0 355 185 0 0 0 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 102 566 0 0 355 185 0 0 0 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 107 596 0 0 374 195 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 107 596 0 0 374 195 0 0 0 0 0 0 I II II II I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx I II II II I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 568 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 1014 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 1014 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.11 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx II II II I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 9.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * * * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER Exisitng Summer No Project Tue Mar 25, 2008 16:08:45 Page 20-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #15 DPR/Pioneer Trail ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 9.7 Worst Case Level Of Service: D[ 27.0] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 189 377 0 0 260 103 146 0 280 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 189 377 0 0 260 103 146 0 280 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 199 397 0 0 274 108 154 0 295 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 199 397 0 0 274 108 154 0 295 0 0 0 I II II II I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx I II II II I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 382 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1068 xxxx 274 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 1187 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 247 xxxx 770 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 1187 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 216 xxxx 770 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.17 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.71 xxxx 0.38 xxxx xxxx xxxx I II II II I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.6 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.7 xxxx 1.8 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 8.6 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 54.7 xxxx 12.5 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * * * * F * B * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 27.0 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * D * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER Movement Summary 89North / DPR 2008 Summer PM Pk No Project Roundabout Vehicle Movements 95% Dem Deg of Aver Level Back Mov ID Turn Flow %HV Satn Delay of of (veh/h) (v/c) (sec) Service Queue (ft) Prop. Eff. Stop Queued Rate Aver Speed (mph) 89 North 3L L 158 1.9 0.540 10.3 LOS B 136 0.71 0.75 26.0 8T T 341 2.1 0.540 4.8 LOS A 136 0.71 0.53 29.4 8R R 24 4.2 0.545 5.6 LOS A 136 0.71 0.62 28.5 Approach 522 2.1 0.540 6.5 LOS A 136 0.71 0.60 28.2 Gray's Xing 0 L 17 5.6 0.050 12.9 LOS B 10 0.75 0.74 21.0 6T T 5 16.7 0.050 6.0 LOS A 10 0.75 0.62 22.3 6R R 2 33.3 0.050 7.0 LOS A 10 0.75 0.61 22.3 Approach 27 11.1 0.050 10.7 LOS B 10 0.75 0.70 21.3 89 North 7L L 3 25.0 0.364 7.9 LOS A 52 0.31 0.61 27.1 4T T 208 1.9 0.363 2.4 LOS A 52 0.31 0.25 31.5 4R R 234 2.1 0.362 3.3 LOS A 52 0.31 0.35 30.4 Approach 445 2.2 0.362 2.9 LOS A 52 0.31 0.31 30.9 DPR 5L L 312 1.9 0.506 8.5 LOS A 109 0.52 0.64 22.0 2T T 10 9.1 0.500 1.5 LOS A 109 0.52 0.23 23.3 2R R 250 2.0 0.505 2.6 LOS A 109 0.52 0.34 23.3 Approach 573 2.1 0.505 5.8 LOS A 109 0.52 0.50 22.6 All Vehicles 1567 2.3 0.545 5.3 LOS A 136 0.53 0.48 26.2 Exisitng Summer No Project Tue Mar 25, 2008 16:08:45 Page 22-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #17 SR 267 Bypass -SR 89 N/I-80 EB ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): Loss Time (sec): Optimal Cycle: ******************************************************************************** 60 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 60 Level Of Service: 0.732 19.0 B Street Name: SR 89 North Approach: North Bound South Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - I II Control: Rights: Min. Green: Lanes: Protected Protected Include Include 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 II Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 562 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 562 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 592 Reduct Vol: 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 592 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 592 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 0 1900 Capacity Analysis Vol/Sat: 0.00 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 LOS by Move: A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 11 8 5 3 0 2 0 6 0 0 0 ******************************************************************************** I 80 EB East Bound West Bound R L - T - R L - T - R II II 0 0 II Split Phase Split Phase Include Include 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 II 431 190 299 0 123 0 251 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 431 190 299 0 123 0 251 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 454 200 315 0 129 0 264 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 454 200 315 0 129 0 264 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 454 200 315 0 129 0 264 0 0 0 II II II 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1615 1805 1900 0 1809 0 1615 0 0 0 II II II Module: 0.31 0.28 0.11 0.17 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 **** **** **** 0.43 0.43 0.15 0.58 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.73 0.66 0.73 0.29 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.9 16.2 34.1 6.6 0.0 19.9 0.0 29.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 17.9 16.2 34.1 6.6 0.0 19.9 0.0 29.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 B B C A A B A C A A A Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER Exisitng Summer No Project Tue Mar 25, 2008 16:08:45 Page 23-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #18 SR 267 Bypass/I-80 WB ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.611 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 16.3 Optimal Cycle: 60 Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Street Name: SR 89 North I-80 Westbound Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 293 392 0 0 383 54 0 0 0 106 1 162 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 293 392 0 0 383 54 0 0 0 106 1 162 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 308 413 0 0 403 57 0 0 0 112 1 171 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 308 413 0 0 403 57 0 0 0 112 1 171 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 308 413 0 0 403 57 0 0 0 112 1 171 I II I I II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.94 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.99 0.01 1.00 Final Sat.: 1805 1900 0 0 1900 1615 0 0 0 1771 17 1615 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.17 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.11 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.28 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.17 0.17 Volume/Cap: 0.61 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.61 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.36 0.61 Delay/Veh: 21.0 5.5 0.0 0.0 17.9 13.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.6 22.6 26.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 21.0 5.5 0.0 0.0 17.9 13.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.6 22.6 26.9 LOS by Move: C A A A B B A A A C C C HCM2kAvgQ: 6 4 0 0 7 1 0 0 0 2 2 4 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER Exisitng Summer No Project Tue Mar 25, 2008 16:08:45 Page 24-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #19 Bridge Street/ West River St ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 68.4 Worst Case Level Of Service: F[315.1] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Bridge Street West River St Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 294 455 12 42 469 96 100 8 360 15 4 39 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 294 455 12 42 469 96 100 8 360 15 4 39 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 309 479 13 44 494 101 105 8 379 16 4 41 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 309 479 13 44 494 101 105 8 379 16 4 41 I II II II I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 I II II II I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 595 xxxx xxxxx 492 xxxx xxxxx 1759 1743 544 1931 1787 485 Potent Cap.: 991 xxxx xxxxx 1082 xxxx xxxxx 67 88 543 51 82 586 Move Cap.: 991 xxxx xxxxx 1082 xxxx xxxxx 43 58 543 10 54 586 Volume/Cap: 0.31 xxxx xxxx 0.04 xxxx xxxx 2.44 0.15 0.70 1.57 0.08 0.07 I II II II I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 1.3 xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 5.5 xxxx xxxx 0.2 Control Del: 10.3 xxxx xxxxx 8.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 25.6 xxxxx xxxx 11.6 LOS by Move: B * * A * * * * D * * B Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 44 xxxx xxxxx 12 xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 12.2 xxxx xxxxx 3.3 xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 914.2 xxxx xxxxx 938.2 xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * F * * F * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 230.6 315.1 ApproachLOS: * * F F ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER Exisitng Summer No Project Tue Mar 25, 2008 16:08:45 Page 25-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #20 Brockway Road/Palisades Drive ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.624 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 26.3 Optimal Cycle: 60 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Brockway Road Palisades Drive Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Split Phase Split Phase Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 236 0 126 0 0 0 0 533 310 220 475 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 236 0 126 0 0 0 0 533 310 220 475 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 248 0 133 0 0 0 0 561 326 232 500 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 248 0 133 0 0 0 0 561 326 232 500 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 248 0 133 0 0 0 0 561 326 232 500 0 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1805 0 1615 0 0 0 0 1900 1615 1805 1900 0 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.14 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.20 0.13 0.26 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.22 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.47 0.47 0.21 0.68 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.62 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.62 0.43 0.62 0.39 0.00 Delay/Veh: 45.3 0.0 40.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.0 21.2 46.7 8.6 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 45.3 0.0 40.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.0 21.2 46.7 8 6 0.0 LOS by Move: D A D A A A A C C D A A HCM2kAvgQ: 9 0 4 0 0 0 0 16 8 9 8 0 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER Movement Summary Brockway Road/Martis Valley Road 2008 Summer PM Pk No Project Roundabout Vehicle Movements 95% Mov Dem Deg of Aver Level Back ID Turn Flow %HV Satn Delay of of (veh/h) (v/c) (sec) Service Queue (ft) Prop. Eff. Stop Queued Rate Aver Speed (mph) Martis Valley 3L L 96 2.1 0.328 11.9 LOS B 59 0.60 0.77 22.2 8T T 5 16.7 0.333 2.8 LOS A 59 0.60 0.42 23.0 8R R 168 1.8 0.327 5.9 LOS A 59 0.60 0.61 23.5 Approach 270 2.2 0.327 7.9 LOS A 59 0.60 0.66 23.0 Brockway 0 L 149 2.0 0.438 10.3 LOS B 96 0.37 0.62 28.5 6T T 369 1.9 0.438 5.7 LOS A 96 0.37 0.47 32.9 6R R 5 16.7 0.429 6.0 LOS A 96 0.37 0.50 31.9 Approach 524 2.1 0.438 7.0 LOS A 96 0.37 0.52 31.5 Martis Valley 7L L 21 4.5 0.069 12.7 LOS B 11 0.60 0.74 22.0 4T T 5 16.7 0.069 3.6 LOS A 11 0.60 0.51 23.0 4R R 19 5.0 0.069 6.7 LOS A 11 0.60 0.57 23.5 Approach 48 6.2 0.069 9.0 LOS A 11 0.60 0.64 22.7 Brockway 5L L 5 16.7 0.462 10.9 LOS B 100 0.46 0.68 28.3 2T T 392 2.0 0.474 6.3 LOS A 100 0.46 0.54 32.4 2R R 121 1.7 0.475 6.6 LOS A 100 0.46 0.55 31.4 Approach 519 2.1 0.474 6.4 LOS A 100 0.46 0.54 32.1 All Vehicles 1361 2.3 0.475 7.0 LOS A 100 0.46 0.56 29.1 Exisitng Summer No Project Tue Mar 25, 2008 16:08:45 Page 27-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #22 SR 267/Brockway Road/Joerger Drive ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 95 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.912 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 43.4 Optimal Cycle: 112 Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 291 807 12 55 374 120 148 48 356 18 76 120 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 291 807 12 55 374 120 148 48 356 18 76 120 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 306 849 13 58 394 126 156 51 375 19 80 126 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 306 849 13 58 394 126 156 51 375 19 80 126 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 306 849 13 58 394 126 156 51 375 19 80 126 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.96 0.96 0.85 0.99 0.99 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 0.99 0.01 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.76 0.24 1.00 0.19 0.81 1.00 Final Sat.: 1805 1868 28 1805 1900 1615 1383 449 1615 361 1522 1615 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.17 0.45 0.45 0.03 0.21 0.08 0.11 0.11 0.23 0.05 0.05 0.08 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.24 0.50 0.50 0.04 0.29 0.29 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.09 0.09 0.09 Volume/Cap: 0.71 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.71 0.27 0.44 0.44 0.91 0.61 0.61 0.91 Delay/Veh: 38.3 34.8 34.8 127.9 34.1 26.0 30.4 30.4 58.6 48.7 48.7 93.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 38.3 34.8 34.8 127.9 34.1 26.0 30.4 30.4 58.6 48.7 48.7 93.9 LOS by Move: D C C F C C C C E D D F HCM2kAvgQ: 10 27 27 4 11 3 5 5 15 4 4 7 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER Exisitng Summer No Project Tue Mar 25, 2008 16:08:45 Page 28-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #23 SR 267/Airport Road/Schaffer Mill Road ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): Loss Time (sec): Optimal Cycle: 88 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** 90 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.824 16 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 30.0 Street Name: SR 267 Airport Road/Schaffer Mill Road Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R II II II I Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 I II II II Volume Module: Base Vol: 21 743 34 72 638 47 165 9 35 44 5 155 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 21 743 34 72 638 47 165 9 35 44 5 155 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 22 782 36 76 672 49 174 9 37 46 5 163 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 22 782 36 76 672 49 174 9 37 46 5 163 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 22 782 36 76 672 49 174 9 37 46 5 163 I II II II Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.96 0.96 0.85 0.96 0.96 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 0.96 0.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.05 1.00 0.90 0.10 1.00 Final Sat.: 1805 1804 83 1805 1900 1615 1721 94 1615 1633 186 1615 I II II II Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.43 0.43 0.04 0.35 0.03 0.10 0.10 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.10 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.02 0.53 0.53 0.05 0.56 0.56 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 Volume/Cap: 0.63 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.63 0.05 0.82 0.82 0.19 0.23 0.23 0.82 Delay/Veh: 76.2 23.5 23.5 85.0 14.9 9.1 60.0 60.0 35.9 36.2 36.2 62.1 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 76.2 23.5 23.5 85.0 14.9 9.1 60.0 60.0 35.9 36.2 36.2 62.1 LOS by Move: E C C F B A E E D D D E HCM2kAvgQ: 2 21 21 4 13 1 7 7 1 1 1 7 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER Exisitng Summer No Project Tue Mar 25, 2008 16:08:45 Page 29-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #24 267 / Northstar Dr ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): Loss Time (sec): Optimal Cycle: ******************************************************************************** 60 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.646 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 13.4 47 Level Of Service: B Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L 1 Control: Rights: Min. Green: Lanes: 1 - T - R L - T - II Protected Include 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 II Volume Module: Base Vol: 56 561 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 56 561 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 59 591 Reduct Vol: 0 0 Reduced Vol: 59 591 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 59 591 1 R L - T - R L - T - R II II 1 Protected Split Phase Split Phase Include Include Include 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 II II 1 0 0 624 93 237 0 75 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 0 624 93 237 0 75 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0 0 657 98 249 0 79 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 657 98 249 0 79 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: Adjustment: Lanes: Final Sat.: 1900 1900 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1805 1900 0 0 657 98 249 0 79 0 0 0 II II II 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 1900 1615 1805 0 1615 0 0 0 1 1 II II II 1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.06 0.14 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.05 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.54 0.21 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.65 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.11 0.65 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 42.8 8.0 0.0 0.0 11.3 7.0 25.3 0.0 19.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 42.8 8.0 0.0 0.0 11.3 7.0 25.3 0.0 19.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: D A A A B A C A B A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 2 7 0 0 10 1 5 0 1 0 0 0 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER Exisitng Summer No Project Tue Mar 25, 2008 16:08:45 Page 30-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #25 SR 28/SR 267 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 80 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.994 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 26.7 Optimal Cycle: 120 Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Street Name: SR 267 SR 28 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R II II II I Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 1 0 2 402 1 259 190 765 1 2 704 368 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 1 0 2 402 1 259 190 765 1 2 704 368 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 1 0 2 423 1 273 200 805 1 2 741 387 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 1 0 2 423 1 273 200 805 1 2 741 387 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 1 0 2 423 1 273 200 805 1 2 741 387 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.71 0.71 0.85 0.20 1.00 1.00 0.32 0.95 0.95 Lanes: 0.33 0.00 0.67 0.99 0.01 1.00 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 1.31 0.69 Final Sat.: 538 0 1075 1349 3 1615 376 3795 5 600 2368 1238 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.31 0.17 0.53 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.31 0.31 Crit Moves: **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.32 0.00 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 Volume/Cap: 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.99 0.99 0.54 0.99 0.40 0.40 0.01 0.59 0.59 Delay/Veh: 18.8 0.0 18.8 69.3 69.3 23.7 80.2 11.1 11.1 8.7 13.1 13.1 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 18.8 0.0 18.8 69.3 69.3 23.7 80.2 11.1 11.1 8.7 13.1 13.1 LOS by Move: B A B E E C F B B A B B HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 17 17 6 9 6 6 0 10 10 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER Exisitng Summer No Project Tue Mar 25, 2008 16:08:45 Page 31-1 1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #28 89 south / DPR ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 90 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.020 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 59.9 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: E ******************************************************************************** Approach: Movement: Control: Rights: Min. Green: Lanes: North Bound L - T - R II Protected Include 0 0 0 1 0 0 South Bound L - T - R II Protected Include 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 428 Growth Adj: 1.00 Initial Bse: 428 User Adj: 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 PHF Volume: 451 Reduct Vol: 0 Reduced Vol: 451 PCE Adj: 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 FinalVolume: 451 II East Bound West Bound L - T - R L - T - R II I Protected Include 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 II Protected Include 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 II 76 193 82 191 86 107 412 482 289 574 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 76 193 82 191 86 107 412 482 289 574 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 80 203 86 201 91 113 434 507 304 604 0 1 105 1.00 105 1.00 0.95 111 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80 203 86 201 91 113 434 507 304 604 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 80 203 86 201 91 113 434 507 304 604 II II II Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: Adjustment: Lanes: Final Sat.: 1900 1900 0.96 0.96 0.85 0.15 1547 275 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 0.85 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.46 1.06 0.48 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1615 786 1831 824 1805 1900 1615 1805 1900 II II II Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.29 0.29 0.13 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.06 0.23 0.31 0.17 0.32 0.07 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.08 0.31 0.31 0.17 0.40 0.40 Volume/Cap: 1.02 1.02 0.44 1.02 1.02 1.02 0.80 0.74 1.02 1.02 0.80 0.17 Delay/Veh: 76.6 76.6 26.9 92.0 92.0 92.0 68.3 32.9 76.5 94.8 30.4 17.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 76.6 76.6 26.9 92.0 92.0 92.0 68.3 32.9 76.5 94.8 30.4 17.8 LOS by Move: E E C F F F E C E F C B HCM2kAvgQ: 22 22 5 10 10 10 5 12 21 14 17 2 ******************************************************************************** 111 1.00 1.00 111 1900 0.85 1.00 1615 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER MITIG8 - 2008 Winter No ProWed Jun 4, 2008 16:00:01 Page 1-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 SR 89 South/West River Street ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.672 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 11.0 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Street Name: SR 89 West River Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1369 144 158 414 0 0 0 0 80 0 112 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1369 144 158 414 0 0 0 0 80 0 112 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 1441 152 166 436 0 0 0 0 84 0 118 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1441 152 166 436 0 0 0 0 84 0 118 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 1441 152 166 436 0 0 0 0 84 0 118 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.95 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 0.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 0 3610 1615 1805 1900 0 0 0 0 1805 0 1615 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.40 0.09 0.09 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.07 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.59 0.59 0.14 0.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.21 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.67 0.16 0.67 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.00 0.35 Delay/Veh: 0.0 9.1 5.5 31.7 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 40.7 0.0 21.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 9.1 5.5 31.7 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 40.7 0.0 21.0 LOS by Move: A A A C A A A A A D A C HCM2kAvgQ: 0 11 1 4 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER MITIG8 - 2008 Winter No ProWed Jun 4, 2008 16:00:53 Page 1-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #23 SR 267/Airport Road/Schaffer Mill Road ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.919 Loss Time (sec): 16 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 40.5 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Street Name: SR 267 Airport Road/Schaffer Mill Road Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 15 1006 37 106 445 27 110 4 45 34 4 134 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 15 1006 37 106 445 27 110 4 45 34 4 134 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 16 1059 39 112 468 28 116 4 47 36 4 141 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 16 1059 39 112 468 28 116 4 47 36 4 141 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 16 1059 39 112 468 28 116 4 47 36 4 141 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.96 0.96 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 0.96 0.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 0.04 1.00 0.89 0.11 1.00 Final Sat.: 1805 1823 67 1805 1900 1615 1749 64 1615 1627 191 1615 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.58 0.58 0.06 0.25 0.02 0.07 0.07 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.09 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.02 0.63 0.63 0.07 0.68 0.68 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.10 0.10 0.10 Volume/Cap: 0.36 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.36 0.03 0.92 0.92 0.41 0.23 0.23 0.92 Delay/Veh: 62.8 30.7 30.7 112.6 8.6 6.4 109.7 110 55.5 50.9 50.9 103.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 62.8 30.7 30.7 112.6 8.6 6.4 109.7 110 55.5 50.9 50.9 103.0 LOS by Move: E C C F A A F F E D D F HCM2kAvgQ: 1 39 39 7 7 0 7 7 2 2 2 8 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER MITIG8 - 2008 Winter No ProWed Jun 4, 2008 17:30:37 Page 1-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #24 267 / Northstar Dr ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.587 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 15.4 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 41 328 0 0 382 142 730 0 359 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 41 328 0 0 382 142 730 0 359 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 43 345 0 0 402 149 768 0 378 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 43 345 0 0 402 149 768 0 378 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 43 345 0 0 402 149 768 0 378 0 0 0 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.92 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1805 1900 0 0 1900 1615 3502 0 1615 0 0 0 I II II II Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.09 0.22 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.04 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.36 0.40 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.59 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.59 0.26 0.55 0.00 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 40.0 13.6 0.0 0.0 16.9 13.8 14.4 0.0 15.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 40.0 13.6 0.0 0.0 16.9 13.8 14.4 0.0 15.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: D B A A B B B A B A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 2 5 0 0 7 2 6 0 6 0 0 0 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER MITIG8 - 2008 Winter No ProWed Jun 4, 2008 16:04:31 Page 1-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #25 SR 28/SR 267 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 80 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.928 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 38.1 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Street Name: SR 267 SR 28 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R 1 II II II I Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 6 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 539 0 304 245 668 1 18 507 271 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 539 0 304 245 668 1 18 507 271 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 567 0 320 258 703 1 19 534 285 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 567 0 320 258 703 1 19 534 285 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 567 0 320 258 703 1 19 534 285 I II II II Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.71 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 Lanes: 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 1.30 0.70 Final Sat.: 0 1900 0 1357 0 1615 1805 3794 6 1805 2348 1255 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.00 0.20 0.14 0.19 0.19 0.01 0.23 0.23 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.00 0.45 0.15 0.28 0.28 0.11 0.25 0.25 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.93 0.00 0.44 0.93 0.65 0.65 0.09 0.93 0.93 Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 41.2 0.0 15.5 68.6 26.6 26.6 31.9 45.1 45.1 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 41.2 0.0 15.5 68.6 26.6 26.6 31.9 45.1 45.1 LOS by Move: A A A D A B E C C C D D HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 18 0 6 10 9 9 0 14 14 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER 2008 No Project Mitigated MITIG8 - 2008 No Project Tue Sep 23, 2008 13:57:51 Page 1-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #28 89 south / DPR ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 90 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.920 Loss Time (sec): 16 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 45.9 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ovl Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 428 76 193 82 191 86 107 412 482 289 574 105 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 428 76 193 82 191 86 107 412 482 289 574 105 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 451 80 203 86 201 91 113 434 507 304 604 111 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 451 80 203 86 201 91 113 434 507 304 604 111 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 451 80 203 86 201 91 113 434 507 304 604 111 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.89 0.89 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 0.28 0.72 0.46 1.06 0.48 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1805 479 1216 786 1831 824 1805 1900 1615 1805 1900 1615 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.25 0.17 0.17 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.06 0.23 0.31 0.17 0.32 0.07 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.27 0.24 0.24 0.15 0.12 0.12 0.07 0.25 0.52 0.18 0.36 0.36 Volume/Cap: 0.92 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.92 0.92 0.88 0.92 0.60 0.92 0.88 0.19 Delay/Veh: 54.4 37.3 37.3 40.5 64.8 64.8 87.2 56.2 16.4 65.9 39.8 19.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 54.4 37.3 37.3 40.5 64.8 64.8 87.2 56.2 16.4 65.9 39.8 19.9 LOS by Move: D D D D E E F E B E D B HCM2kAvgQ: 16 9 9 7 9 9 6 16 10 12 19 2 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER Mitigated - With signal DPR / Bridge EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR All Delay /Veh (s) 26 .3 26 .4 22.3 116 .6 20 27.5 7.7 11 11 .2 29 1.7 33.6 31 .8 21.8 21.8 61 .8 25 .5 0 .1 39.6 15.3 13 .2 52.3 36.7 4 32 .1 68 .1 31.7 18 .6 57 .6 19 .2 22.4 15.8 9.2 39 .9 36.3 7.1 25 30 .6 30.2 23.9 75 15 .6 26.5 14 .9 8 .4 31 .9 4.8 29 .3 33 .1 29 .7 14 .9 51 .6 17.6 37 .1 35.2 22.1 3 .6 33.8 5.5 29 .5 Average 37.98 27 .96 20.3 72 .52 19 .58 0.1 30.62 17.78 12.78 26 .75 33.54 4 .62 29 .9 Bridge / W River EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR All Delay / Veh (s) 59.6 27.9 109 .3 7.7 67 .3 13.7 20.5 27 31.7 33 .3 53. 7 68.5 18 .8 202 .4 8.7 52 .6 13.2 3.3 22 .3 25.6 14 .3 26 .3 63. 2 71.5 19 213 .5 10.6 49 .9 12 .4 27.1 23 .5 16 .9 27 .8 44.3 22.4 95 .4 7.1 46.9 9.4 9 .5 34 .9 28 .1 25 .3 26.6 42. 9 13 .8 91 .1 110 .9 12.1 37 13.8 6 .2 29 .6 23.7 19.9 22.9 Average 52. 74 70 20.38 142.34 110 .9 9.24 50 .74 12.5 6.333333 26.88 25 .58 21 .62 27 .38 2008 Plus Project 2008 Plus Project Tue Jun 3, 2008 16:08:53 Page 5-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 SR 89 South/West River Street ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.538 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 13.7 Optimal Cycle: 60 Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Street Name: SR 89 West River Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 637 169 236 522 0 0 0 0 120 0 285 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 637 169 236 522 0 0 0 0 120 0 285 Added Vol: 0 0 19 42 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 45 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 637 188 278 522 0 0 0 0 141 0 330 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 671 198 293 549 0 0 0 0 148 0 347 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 671 198 293 549 0 0 0 0 148 0 347 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 671 198 293 549 0 0 0 0 148 0 347 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.95 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 0.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 0 3610 1615 1805 1900 0 0 0 0 1805 0 1615 I II II II Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.19 0.12 0.16 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.22 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.35 0.35 0.30 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.45 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.54 0.35 0.54 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.00 0.47 Delay/Veh: 0.0 16.3 15.0 18.5 5.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.6 0.0 11.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 16.3 15.0 18.5 5.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.6 0 0 11.9 LOS by Move: A B B B A A A A A C A B HCM2kAvgQ: 0 6 3 5 5 0 0 0 0 3 0 5 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER 2008 Plus Project Tue Jun 3, 2008 16:08:53 Page 6-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 West River/McIver Crossing ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 19.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: F[ 75.1] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: McIver Crossing Approach: North Bound South Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R I II II Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 I II Volume Module: Base Vol: 5 3 11 177 8 123 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 5 3 11 177 8 123 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 13 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 5 3 11 177 8 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 5 3 12 186 8 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 5 3 12 186 8 II Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 II Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 1168 1171 Potent Cap.: 172 194 Move Cap.: 119 171 Volume/Cap: 0.04 0.02 378 1022 1020 673 216 239 673 190 210 0.02 0.98 0.04 II Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * Movement: LT - LTR - RT 1 II West River East Bound West Bound L - T - R L - T - R Uncontrolled Include 1 0 0 1 0 101 1.00 101 15 0 0 136 116 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 143 122 0 0 143 122 II 299 10 1.00 1.00 299 10 55 0 0 0 354 1.00 0.95 373 10 1.00 0.95 11 0 0 II II 373 11 II Uncontrolled Include 1 0 1 0 1 5 301 148 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 301 148 0 62 0 0 0 0 5 363 148 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 5 382 156 0 0 0 5 382 156 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx II II I 382 670 670 0.21 XXXX xxxx 0.8 xxxx 11.8 * * B LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx 250 xxxxx 191 xxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx 0.3 xxxxx 8.8 xxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx 20.6 xxxxx 121.7 xxxx Shared LOS: ApproachDel: ApproachLOS: ******************************************************************************** * C * F 20.6 C * 75.1 F 538 1041 1041 0.12 XXXX XXXX xxxx XXXX XXXXX XXXXX xxxxx XXXX 0.4 xxxx 8.9 xxxx A LT - LTR XXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXX xxxxx xxxxx * * XXXX XXXX xxxx * XXXXXX * xxxxx XXXXX * - RT II 383 1186 1186 0.00 XXXX XXXX xxxx XXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXX 0.0 xxxx 8.0 xxxx A LT - LTR XXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXX xxxxx xxxxx * * XXXX XXXX XXXX * XXXXXX * xxxxx XXXXX * - RT XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER SIDRA INTERSECTION ROI WO Movement Summary DPR/McIver 2008 Summer PM Pk Plus Project Roundabout Vehicle Movements 95% Dem Deg of Aver Level Back Mov Turn Flow %HV Satn Delay of of (veh/h) (v/c) (sec) Service Queue (ft) Prop. Eff. Stop Queued Rate Aver Speed (mph) DPR 3L L 108 1.9 0.799 12.4 LOS B 369 0.89 0.73 25.4 8T T 757 2.0 0.799 9.0 LOS A 369 0.89 0.71 28.1 Approach 863 2.0 0.799 9.4 LOS A 369 0.89 0.71 27.7 DPR 4T T 779 2.1 0.802 6.0 LOS A 268 0.57 0.53 31.1 4R R 244 2.0 0.803 6.8 LOS A 268 0.57 0.56 30.6 Approach 1024 2.1 0.802 6.2 LOS A 268 0.57 0.53 31.0 Mc Iver 5L L 167 1.8 0.532 18.2 LOS B 130 0.88 1.07 20.1 2R R 125 1.6 0.532 12.5 LOS B 130 0.88 1.04 20.8 Approach 292 1.7 0.532 15.8 LOS B 130 0.88 1.06 20.4 All Vehicles 2179 2.0 0.803 8.8 LOS A 369 0.74 0.67 27.7 2008 Plus Project Tue Jun 3, 2008 16:08:54 Page 8-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 DPR/I80 Central WB off Ramp ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 5.5 Worst Case Level Of Service: E[ 35.4] ******************************************************************************** Approach: Movement: Control: Rights: Lanes: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R II II II I Uncontrolled Include 0 0 1 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 Added Vol: 0 PasserByVol: 0 Initial Fut: 0 User Adj: 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 Reduct Vol: 0 FinalVolume: 0 746 0 1.00 1.00 746 0 44 0 0 0 790 0 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 832 0 0 0 832 0 Uncontrolled Include 0 0 1 0 II 0 II 0 664 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 664 0 0 42 0 0 0 0 0 706 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0 743 0 0 0 0 743 II Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx I II Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx Move Cap.: xxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx XXXX xxxx xxxx XXXX XXXXX xxxxx xxxxx XXXX I II XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Stop Sign Include 0 0 0 0 0 II 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 II XXXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXX II XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXX Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx LOS by Move: Movement: LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: ApproachDel: ApproachLOS: ******************************************************************************** xxxxxx * * * * LT - LTR XXXX xxxx xxxxx xxxx XXXXX XXXX XXXXX * * * XXXXXX * II XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX II XXXXX XXXXX II XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXX Stop Sign Channel 1 0 0 0 1 54 1.00 54 1 0 55 1.00 0.95 58 0 58 0 208 1.00 1.00 0 208 0 14 0 0 0 222 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0 234 0 0 0 234 6.4 xxxx 3.5 xxxx 6.2 3.3 1575 122 122 0.47 XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 832 372 372 0.63 II xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.1 xxxx 4.1 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 58.5 xxxx 29.6 * * * * F * D - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT XXXXX xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx XXXXX xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx * * * * * * XXXXXX * 35.4 E Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER 2008 Plus Project Tue Jun 3, 2008 16:08:54 Page 9-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 I-80 BB / DPR Central / High St ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 3.5 Worst Case Level Of Service: E[ 47.4] ******************************************************************************** Approach: Movement: Control: Rights: Lanes: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R II II II Uncontrolled Include 0 0 0 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 Added Vol: 0 PasserByVol: 0 Initial Fut: 0 User Adj: 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 872 Uncontrolled Include 0 1 0 0 0 II II Stop Sign Include 0 0 1! 0 0 II Stop Sign Include 0 0 1! 0 0 771 20 21 752 0 10 0 126 6 0 19 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 771 20 21 752 0 10 0 126 6 0 19 57 0 0 43 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 828 20 21 795 0 10 0 138 6 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 872 21 22 837 0 11 0 145 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 22 837 0 11 0 I II II Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx Move Cap.: xxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx LOS by Move: Movement: LT - LTR Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx Shared LOS: ApproachDel: xxxxxx ApproachLOS: ******************************************************************************** xxxx * * II II 4.1 xxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx II 19 1.00 0.95 20 0 0 0 0 145 6 0 20 II 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 II 893 xxxx xxxxx 1773 1774 768 xxxx xxxxx 65 84 768 xxxx xxxxx 60 81 0.03 xxxx xxxx 0.17 0.00 II 0.1 xxxx 9.8 xxxx A LT - LTR xxxx xxxx 0.1 xxxx 9.8 A xxxxxx * xxxx * * * D 837 1836 1763 882 370 59 85 348 370 35 83 348 0.39 0.18 0.00 0.06 II I * * Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER 2008 Plus Project Tue Jun 3, 2008 16:08:54 Page 10-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 DPR/Spring ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 6.6 Worst Case Level Of Service: F[105.5] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 3 2 0 17 0 203 263 554 0 0 350 31 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 3 2 0 17 0 203 263 554 0 0 350 31 Added Vol: 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 71 0 0 71 1 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 3 2 0 18 0 203 263 625 0 0 421 32 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 3 2 0 19 0 214 277 658 0 0 443 34 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 3 2 0 19 0 214 277 658 0 0 443 34 I II II II I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 7.1 6.5 xxxxx 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx I II II II I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 1778 1688 xxxxx 1656 1655 443 477 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 65 95 xxxxx 79 99 619 1096 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 33 66 xxxxx 59 70 619 1096 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.10 0.03 xxxx 0.32 0.00 0.35 0.25 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx I II II II I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 9.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * A * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: 41 xxxx xxxxx xxxx 350 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue: 0.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 4.5 xxxxx 1.0 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDe1:105.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 33.5 xxxxx 9.4 xxxx xxxxx 9.0 xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: F * * * D * A * * A * ApproachDel: 105.5 33.5 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: F D * * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER 2008 Plus Project Tue Jun 3, 2008 16:08:54 Page 11-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report Unknown Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #7 DPR/Bridge Street ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Loss Time (sec): 0 Optimal Cycle: 0 ******************************************************************************** Critical Vol./Cap.(X): (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): Level Of Service: 0.000 0.0 Approach: Movement: Control: Rights: Min. Green: Lanes: North Bound South Bound L - T - R L - T - R I II II Protected Include 0 0 0 0 1! 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 241 119 Growth Adj: 0.00 0.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 Added Vol: 0 50 DPR / Bridge Delay / Veh (s) Protected Include 0 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 II East Bound L - T - R II 0 0 1 II Stop Sign Include 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 II West Bound L - T - R Stop Sign Include 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 244 13 96 22 37 239 271 213 110 5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 66 0 61 29 19 59 0 65 48 0 EBT All 267.9 108.6 311.4 95.7 268.8 89.9 276.4 93.9 224.5 85.3 Average 269.8 94.68 2008 Plus Project Tue Jun 3, 2008 16:08:54 Page 12-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #8 Bridge and Church ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 4.7 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 12.3] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 141 18 13 106 0 15 5 10 15 0 68 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 141 18 13 106 0 15 5 10 15 0 68 Added Vol: 0 0 68 2 0 0 0 0 0 90 0 2 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 141 86 15 106 0 15 5 10 105 0 70 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 148 91 16 112 0 16 5 11 111 0 74 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 148 91 16 112 0 16 5 11 111 0 74 I II 1 II I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 I II II II I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 239 xxxx xxxxx 374 382 112 345 337 194 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1340 xxxx xxxxx 587 554 947 613 587 853 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1340 xxxx xxxxx 531 547 947 597 580 853 Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.01 xxxx xxxx 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.19 0.00 0.09 I II II II I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.7 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * A * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 626 xxxxx xxxx 678 xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.2 xxxxx xxxxx 1.1 xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.7 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 11.1 xxxxx xxxxx 12.3 xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * A * * * B * * B * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 11.1 12.3 ApproachLOS: * * B B ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER 2008 Plus Project Tue Jun 3, 2008 16:08:54 Page 13-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #9 Jiboom and Bridge ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 6.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 12.8] ******************************************************************************** Approach: Movement: 1 North Bound South Bound L - T - R L - T - R II II Control: Stop Sign Rights: Include Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 1 II Volume Module: Base Vol: 189 11 23 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 189 11 23 Added Vol: 2 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 191 11 23 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 201 12 24 Reduct Vol: 0 FinalVolume: 201 1 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 1 II Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 258 254 Potent Cap.: 699 653 Move Cap.: 680 647 Volume/Cap: 0.30 0.02 1 Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx 694 xxxxx xxxx 668 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx 1.5 xxxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx 12.8 xxxxx xxxxx 10.6 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * B * * B * * * * ApproachDel: 12.8 10.6 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: B B * * ******************************************************************************** 0 0 0 12 24 12 II Stop Sign Include 0 0 1! 0 0 II 11 12 1.00 1.00 11 12 0 0 0 0 11 12 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 12 13 0 13 4 1.00 4 0 0 4 1.00 0.95 4 0 4 172 267 303 877 689 613 877 656 607 0.03 0.02 0.02 11 East Bound West Bound L - T - R L - T - R Uncontrolled Include 0 0 1! 0 0 II II Uncontrolled Include 0 0 1! 0 0 1 112 100 12 44 8 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 112 100 12 44 8 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 112 102 12 44 8 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1 118 107 13 46 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 118 107 13 46 8 II II 1 1 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx II II 1 51 55 1023 1563 1023 1563 0.00 0.00 11 XXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXXX * * * 0.0 7.3 A XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX * XXXXX XXXXX * 11 225 1355 1355 0.01 XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 0.0 xxxx 7.7 xxxx A LT - LTR XXXX xxxx XXXXX xxxx XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXX 1 XXXXX XXXXX * - RT XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXXX * * * XXXXXX Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER 2008 Plus Project Tue Jun 3, 2008 16:08:54 Page 14-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #10 DPR/ Church ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 22.9 Worst Case Level Of Service: F[ 61.6] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Approach: Movement: Control: Rights: Lanes: DPR North Bound South Bound L - T - R L - T - R II Uncontrolled Include 0 0 1! 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 17 303 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 17 303 Added Vol: 0 16 PasserByVol: 0 0 Initial Fut: 17 319 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 18 336 Reduct Vol: 0 0 FinalVolume: 18 336 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx II Uncontrolled Include 0 0 1! 0 0 Church East Bound West Bound L - T - R L - T - R II II Stop Sign Include 0 0 1! 0 0 II II Stop Sign Include 0 0 1! 0 0 7 26 154 37 25 5 8 42 38 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 26 154 37 25 5 8 42 38 0 65 27 0 0 70 0 4 92 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 91 181 37 25 75 8 46 130 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 7 96 191 39 26 79 8 48 137 Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 229 Potent Cap.: 1350 Move Cap.: 1350 Volume/Cap: 0.01 XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 64 1.00 64 87 0 151 1.00 0.95 159 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 96 191 39 26 79 8 48 137 159 II II II II 4.1 xxxx 2.2 xxxx XXXXX 343 XXXXX 1227 XXXXX 1227 XXXX 0.08 II Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 7.7 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A Movement: LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: ApproachDel: xxxxxx ApproachLOS: ******************************************************************************** XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXX 7.1 6.5 XXXXX 3.5 4.0 II XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXX II 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 II 925 781 210 252 329 835 115 298 835 0.23 0.27 0.01 0.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxx 8.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx A LT - LTR XXXX xxxx XXXX XXXX * XXXXXX XXXX xxxxx XXXX xxxxx * * * * - RT LT - LTR - RT xxxxx xxxx 226 xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx 2.6 xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx 36.1 xxxxx * * E 36.1 E 821 796 296 322 217 292 0.22 0.47 II 339 707 707 0.22 XXXX xxxx xxxxx XXXXX xxxx xxxxx * * * LT - LTR - RT XXXX 375 xxxxx XXXXX 9.6 xxxxx XXXXX 61.6 xxxxx * F 61.6 F Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER 2008 Plus Project Tue Jun 3, 2008 16:08:54 Page 15-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #11 DPR / Keiser ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 3.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: C[ 24.2] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 1 391 0 0 216 55 130 0 1 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 1 391 0 0 216 55 130 0 1 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 103 0 0 92 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 1 494 0 0 308 55 130 0 1 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 1 520 0 0 324 58 137 0 1 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 1 520 0 0 324 58 137 0 1 0 0 0 I II II II I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 6.5 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx I II II II I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 382 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 875 875 353 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 1187 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 322 290 695 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 1187 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 322 290 695 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.42 0.00 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx I II II II I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 8.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 323 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 2.0 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel: 8.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 24.2 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: A * * * * * * C * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 24.2 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * C * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER 2008 Plus Project Tue Jun 3, 2008 16:08:54 Page 16-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #12 DPR/Glenshire Drive ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 4.6 Worst Case Level Of Service: C[ 16.9] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 10 0 181 0 0 0 0 324 198 238 261 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 10 0 181 0 0 0 0 324 198 238 261 0 Added Vol: 1 0 40 0 0 0 0 101 3 41 91 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 11 0 221 0 0 0 0 425 201 279 352 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 12 0 233 0 0 0 0 447 212 294 371 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 12 0 233 0 0 0 0 447 212 294 371 0 I II II II I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 5.6 xxxx 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx I II II II I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 1511 xxxx 553 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 659 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 187 xxxx 536 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 939 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 142 xxxx 536 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 939 xxxx xxxxx Total Cap: 250 177 xxxxx 0 121 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.05 xxxx 0.43 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.31 xxxx xxxx I II II II I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.1 xxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1.3 xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 20.1 xxxx 16.8 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 10.6 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: C * C * * * * * * B * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: 16.9 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: C * * * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER 2008 Plus Project Tue Jun 3, 2008 16:08:54 Page 17-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #13 I-80 EB/DPR Eastern ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 8.4 Worst Case Level Of Service: D[ 32.3] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: DPR I-80 EB Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 505 0 0 355 0 163 0 144 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 505 0 0 355 0 163 0 144 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 140 0 0 66 0 0 0 66 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 645 0 0 421 0 163 0 210 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 679 0 0 443 0 172 0 221 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 679 0 0 443 0 172 0 221 0 0 0 I II II II Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx I II II II I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1122 xxxx 443 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 230 xxxx 619 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 230 xxxx 619 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.75 xxxx 0.36 xxxx xxxx xxxx I II II II I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 5.2 xxxx 1.6 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 55.9 xxxx 14.0 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * F * B * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 32.3 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * D * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER 2008 Plus Project Tue Jun 3, 2008 16:08:54 Page 18-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #14 I-80 WB/DPR Eastern ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 1.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: A[ 9.7] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: DPR I-80 WB Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 102 566 0 0 355 185 0 0 0 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 102 566 0 0 355 185 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added Vol: 73 67 0 0 66 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 175 633 0 0 421 185 0 0 0 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 184 666 0 0 443 195 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 184 666 0 0 443 195 0 0 0 0 0 0 I II II II I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx I II II II I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 638 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 956 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 956 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.19 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx II II II I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.7 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 9.7 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * * * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER 2008 Plus Project Tue Jun 3, 2008 16:08:54 Page 19-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #15 DPR/Pioneer Trail ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 13.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: E[ 40.2] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound Movement: L - T - R II Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 I II II Volume Module: South Bound East Bound L - T - R L - T - R II II Base Vol: Growth Adj: Initial Bse: Added Vol: PasserByVol: Initial Fut: 203 User Adj: 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 PHF Volume: 214 Reduct Vol: 0 FinalVolume: 214 189 377 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 189 377 0 14 53 0 0 0 0 430 0 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 453 0 0 0 453 0 II Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 437 Potent Cap.: 1134 Move Cap.: 1134 Volume/Cap: 0.19 I II Level Of Service Module: 0 1.00 0 0 0 0 1.00 0.95 0 0 0 260 1.00 260 52 0 312 1.00 0.95 328 0 328 XXXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXX II XXXX XXXXX xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx XXXX XXXX XXXX xxxx XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 103 1.00 103 0 0 103 1.00 0.95 108 0 108 1 Stop Sign Include 1 0 0 0 1 II 146 0 280 1.00 1.00 1.00 146 0 280 0 0 13 0 0 0 146 0 293 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 154 0 308 0 0 0 154 0 308 1 II XXXXX XXXXX II XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXX 2Way95thQ: 0.7 xxxx xxxxx xxxx Control Del: 8.9 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A Movement: Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: ApproachDel: xxxxxx ApproachLOS: ******************************************************************************** * * * * 6.4 xxxx 3.5 xxxx 1208 204 174 0.88 11 XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx xxxxx 93.2 * F xxxx * XXXX * LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR XXXX xxxx XXXX * XXXXXX * XXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXX * * * 40.2 E West Bound L - T - R Stop Sign Include 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx II I 328 718 718 0.43 II XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXX 1 2.2 xxxx xxxx xxxxx 13.7 xxxxx B XXXX XXXXX * * - RT LT - LTR - RT XXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX * * XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX * * XXXXXX * Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER SIDRA INTERSECTION Movement Summary 89North / DPR 2008 Summer PM Pk Plus Project Roundabout Vehicle Movements 95% Dem Deg of Aver Level Back ID Turn Flow %HV Satn Delay of of (veh/h) (v/c) (sec) Service Queue (ft) Prop. Eff. Stop Queued Rate Aver Speed (mph) 89 North 3L L 195 2.1 0.593 11.3 LOS B 169 0.76 0.81 25.8 8T T 341 2.1 0.592 5.8 LOS A 169 0.76 0.66 29.2 8R R 24 4.2 0.585 6.5 LOS A 169 0.76 0.69 28.3 Approach 560 2.1 0.592 7.7 LOS A 169 0.76 0.71 27.8 Gray's Xing 0 L 17 5.6 0.055 13.6 LOS B 11 0.79 0.76 20.7 6T T 7 14.3 0.056 6.7 LOS A 11 0.79 0.66 22.0 6R R 2 33.3 0.056 7.7 LOS A 11 0.79 0.63 22.0 Approach 28 10.7 0.055 11.3 LOS B 11 0.79 0.72 21.1 89 North 7L L 3 25.0 0.400 8.0 LOS A 59 0.36 0.63 26.9 4T T 208 1.9 0.391 2.5 LOS A 59 0.36 0.27 31.3 4R R 254 2.0 0.391 3.4 LOS A 59 0.36 0.37 30.1 Approach 465 2.2 0.391 3.1 LOS A 59 0.36 0.33 30.6 DPR 5L L 333 2.1 0.555 8.6 LOS A 128 0.56 0.65 21.9 2T T 11 8.3 0.545 1.6 LOS A 128 0.56 0.24 23.2 2R R 287 2.1 0.555 2.7 LOS A 128 0.56 0.36 23.2 Approach 632 2.2 0.555 5.8 LOS A 128 0.56 0.51 22.5 All Vehicles 1685 2.3 0.593 5.8 LOS A 169 0.57 0.53 26.0 MITIG8 - 2008 Plus Project Wed Jun 4, 2008 10:54:53 Page 1-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #17 SR 267 Bypass -SR 89 N/I-80 EB ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.757 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 20.2 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Street Name: SR 89 North I 80 EB Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 I II II II Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 562 431 190 299 0 123 0 251 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 562 431 190 299 0 123 0 251 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 562 431 224 299 0 123 0 251 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 592 454 236 315 0 129 0 264 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 592 454 236 315 0 129 0 264 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 592 454 236 315 0 129 0 264 0 0 0 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 1900 1615 1805 1900 0 1809 0 1615 0 0 0 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.31 0.28 0.13 0.17 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.41 0.41 0.17 0.58 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.76 0.68 0.76 0.28 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 19.4 17.4 33.8 6.4 0.0 20.4 0.0 31.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 19.4 17.4 33.8 6.4 0.0 20.4 0.0 31.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: A B B C A A C A C A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 11 8 6 3 0 2 0 7 0 0 0 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER MITIG8 - 2008 Plus Project Wed Jun 4, 2008 11:16:13 Page 1-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #18 SR 267 Bypass/I-80 WB ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.627 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 16.8 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Street Name: SR 89 North I-80 Westbound Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 293 392 0 0 383 54 0 0 0 162 1 106 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 293 392 0 0 383 54 0 0 0 162 1 106 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 34 0 0 0 0 0 2 34 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 293 392 0 0 417 54 0 0 0 162 3 140 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 308 413 0 0 439 57 0 0 0 171 3 147 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 308 413 0 0 439 57 0 0 0 171 3 147 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 308 413 0 0 439 57 0 0 0 171 3 147 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.98 0.02 1.00 Final Sat.: 1805 1900 0 0 1900 1615 0 0 0 1716 32 1615 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.17 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.09 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.27 0.64 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.16 Volume/Cap: 0.63 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.63 0.58 Delay/Veh: 21.7 5.1 0.0 0.0 17.3 12.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.1 28.1 26.6 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 21.7 5.1 0.0 0.0 17.3 12.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.1 28.1 26.6 LOS by Move: C A A A B B A A A C C C HCM2kAvgQ: 6 4 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 4 4 4 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER 2008 Plus Project Tue Jun 3, 2008 16:08:54 Page 23-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #19 Bridge Street/ West River St ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 203.8 Worst Case Level Of Service: F[741.7] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Bridge Street West River St Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 294 455 12 42 469 96 100 8 360 15 4 39 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 294 455 12 42 469 96 100 8 360 15 4 39 Added Vol: 0 59 0 1 62 63 56 0 0 0 0 1 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 294 514 12 43 531 159 156 8 360 15 4 40 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 309 541 13 45 559 167 164 8 379 16 4 42 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 309 541 13 45 559 167 164 8 379 16 4 42 I II II II Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 I II II II Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 726 xxxx xxxxx 554 xxxx xxxxx 1923 1906 643 2093 1983 547 Potent Cap.: 886 xxxx xxxxx 1027 xxxx xxxxx 51 69 477 39 62 540 Move Cap.: 886 xxxx xxxxx 1027 xxxx xxxxx 31 43 477 5 39 540 Volume/Cap: 0.35 xxxx xxxx 0.04 xxxx xxxx 5.34 0.20 0.79 3.25 0.11 0.08 II II II I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 1.6 xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 7.3 xxxx xxxx 0.3 Control Del: 11.2 xxxx xxxxx 8.7 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 35.8 xxxxx xxxx 12.2 LOS by Move: B * * A * * * * E * * B Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 31 xxxx xxxxx 6 xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 20.8 xxxx xxxxx 3.8 xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2291 xxxx xxxxx 2237 xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * F * * F * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 741.7 728.7 ApproachLOS: * * F F ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER MITIG8 - 2008 Plus Project Wed Jun 4, 2008 11:17:24 Page 1-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #20 Brockway Road/Palisades Drive ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.744 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 17.6 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Brockway Road Palisades Drive Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Split Phase Split Phase Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 236 0 126 0 0 0 0 533 310 220 475 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 236 0 126 0 0 0 0 533 310 220 475 0 Added Vol: 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 58 3 0 55 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 239 0 126 0 0 0 0 591 313 220 530 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 252 0 133 0 0 0 0 622 329 232 558 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 252 0 133 0 0 0 0 622 329 232 558 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 252 0 133 0 0 0 0 622 329 232 558 0 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1805 0 1615 0 0 0 0 1900 1615 1805 1900 0 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.14 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.20 0.13 0.29 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.19 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.44 0.17 0.61 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.74 0.00 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.74 0.46 0.74 0.48 0.00 Delay/Veh: 31.7 0.0 22.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.6 12.3 32.9 6.7 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 31.7 0.0 22.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.6 12.3 32.9 6.7 0.0 LOS by Move: C A C A A A A B B C A A HCM2kAvgQ: 6 0 3 0 0 0 0 11 5 6 6 0 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER SIDRA INTERSECTION MI MD Movement Summary Brockway Road/Martis Valley Road 2008 Summer PM Pk Plus Project Roundabout Vehicle Movements 95% Dem Deg of Aver Level Back ID Turn Flow %HV Satn Delay of of (veh/h) (v/c) (sec) Service Queue (ft) Prop. Eff. Stop Queued Rate Aver Speed (mph) Martis Valley 3L L 101 2.0 0.349 12.3 LOS B 65 0.65 0.80 22.1 8T T 5 16.7 0.353 3.3 LOS A 65 0.65 0.48 22.9 8R R 168 1.8 0.350 6.3 LOS A 65 0.65 0.64 23.4 Approach 275 2.2 0.350 8.4 LOS A 65 0.65 0.70 22.9 Brockway 0 L 148 2.0 0.479 10.4 LOS B 112 0.40 0.62 28.5 6T T 418 1.9 0.479 5.8 LOS A 112 0.40 0.48 32.7 6R R 5 16.7 0.462 6.1 LOS A 112 0.40 0.51 31.8 Approach 572 2.1 0.479 7.0 LOS A 112 0.40 0.52 31.5 Martis Valley 7L L 21 4.5 0.073 13.1 LOS B 12 0.64 0.76 21.8 4T T 5 16.7 0.073 4.1 LOS A 12 0.64 0.54 22.9 4R R 19 5.0 0.073 7.1 LOS A 12 0.64 0.59 23.3 Approach 48 6.2 0.073 9.5 LOS A 12 0.64 0.66 22.5 Brockway 5L L 5 16.7 0.545 10.9 LOS B 117 0.49 0.68 28.2 2T T 443 2.0 0.522 6.4 LOS A 117 0.49 0.54 32.2 2R R 126 2.4 0.523 6.6 LOS A 117 0.49 0.55 31.3 Approach 576 2.3 0.522 6.5 LOS A 117 0.49 0.55 32.0 All Vehicles 1471 2.3 0.545 7.1 LOS A 117 0.49 0.57 29.2 MITIG8 - 2008 Plus Project Wed Jun 4, 2008 11:23:09 Page 1-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #22 SR 267/Brockway Road/Joerger Drive ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 105 Loss Time (sec): 16 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED ******************************************************************************** Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.973 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 57.0 Level Of Service: E Approach: Movement: North Bound L - T - R Control: Rights: Min. Green: Lanes: 1 II Protected Include 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 II Volume Module: Base Vol: 291 Growth Adj: 1.00 Initial Bse: 291 Added Vol: 41 807 1.00 807 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 Initial Fut: 332 807 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 349 849 Reduct Vol: 0 0 Reduced Vol: 349 849 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 349 849 Saturation Sat/Lane: Adjustment: Lanes: Final Sat.: Flow Module: 1900 1900 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.99 1805 1868 Capacity Analysis Vol/Sat: 0.19 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.24 0.47 Volume/Cap: 0.80 0.97 Delay/Veh: 47.7 51.1 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 47.7 51.1 LOS by Move: D D HCM2kAvgQ: 13 34 ******************************************************************************** South Bound L - T - R II Protected Include 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 II East Bound West Bound L - T - R L - T - R II Split Phase Split Phase Include Include 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 II I 12 55 374 120 148 48 356 18 76 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 55 374 120 148 48 356 18 76 0 0 0 0 0 5 43 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 55 374 120 148 53 399 18 80 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 13 58 394 126 156 56 420 19 84 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 58 394 126 156 56 420 19 84 126 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 13 58 394 126 156 56 420 19 84 126 II II II 120 1.00 120 0 0 120 1.00 0.95 126 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.97 0.97 0.85 0.99 0.99 0.01 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.74 0.26 1.00 0.18 0.82 28 1805 1900 1615 1350 483 1615 346 1537 II II II Module: 0.45 0.45 **** 1900 0.85 1.00 1615 0.03 0.21 0.08 0.12 0.12 0.26 0.05 0.05 0.08 **** **** **** 0.47 0.03 0.26 0.26 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.97 0.97 0.80 0.30 0.43 0.43 0.97 0.68 0.68 0.97 51.1 157.5 45.6 31.7 32.5 32.5 74.3 59.0 59.0 118.7 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 51.1 157.5 45.6 31.7 32.5 32.5 74.3 59.0 59.0 118.7 D F D C C C E E E F 34 4 14 3 6 6 19 5 5 7 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER MITIG8 - 2008 Plus Project Wed Jun 4, 2008 11:24:07 Page 1-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #23 SR 267/Airport Road/Schaffer Mill Road ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 90 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.857 Loss Time (sec): 16 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 32.4 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Street Name: SR 267 Airport Road/Schaffer Mill Road Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 21 743 34 72 638 47 165 9 35 44 5 155 Growth Adj: 1 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 21 743 34 72 638 47 165 9 35 44 5 155 Added Vol: 0 30 0 9 32 1 1 0 0 0 0 8 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 21 773 34 81 670 48 166 9 35 44 5 163 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 22 814 36 85 705 51 175 9 37 46 5 172 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 22 814 36 85 705 51 175 9 37 46 5 172 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 22 814 36 85 705 51 175 9 37 46 5 172 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.96 0.96 0.85 0.96 0.96 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 0.96 0.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.05 1.00 0.90 0.10 1.00 Final Sat.: 1805 1809 80 1805 1900 1615 1721 93 1615 1633 186 1615 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.45 0.45 0.05 0.37 0.03 0.10 0.10 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.11 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.02 0.52 0.52 0.06 0.56 0.56 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 Volume/Cap: 0.66 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.66 0.06 0.86 0.86 0.19 0.23 0.23 0.86 Delay/Veh: 83.7 26.0 26.0 90.1 15.3 9.0 66.2 66.2 36.3 36.1 36.1 67.4 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 83.7 26.0 26.0 90.1 15.3 9.0 66.2 66.2 36.3 36.1 36.1 67.4 LOS by Move: F C C F B A E E D D D E HCM2kAvgQ: 2 23 23 5 14 1 8 8 1 1 1 7 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER MITIG8 - 2008 Plus Project Wed Jun 4, 2008 11:24:48 Page 1-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #24 267 / Northstar Dr ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: ******************************************************************************** 0.577 11.1 B Approach: Movement: Control: Rights: Min. Green: Lanes: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II Protected Include 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 II Volume Module: Base Vol: 56 561 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 56 561 Added Vol: 0 12 PasserByVol: 0 0 Initial Fut: 56 573 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 59 603 Reduct Vol: 0 0 Reduced Vol: 59 603 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 59 603 Protected Split Phase Split Phase Include Include Include 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 II II I 0 0 624 93 237 0 75 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 0 624 93 237 0 75 0 0 0 0 13 18 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 637 111 254 0 75 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0 0 671 117 267 0 79 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 671 117 267 0 79 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 0 671 117 267 0 79 0 0 II II II Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.92 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1805 1900 0 1900 1900 1615 3502 0 1615 0 1900 I II II II Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.07 0.08 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.06 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.61 0.61 0.13 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.58 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.12 0.58 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 35.6 5.1 0.0 0.0 7.7 4.9 26.3 0.0 24.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 35.6 5.1 0.0 0.0 7.7 4.9 26.3 0.0 24.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: D A A A A A C A C A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 2 6 0 0 8 1 3 0 2 0 0 0 ******************************************************************************** 0 1.00 0 0 0 0 1.00 0.95 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 0 1900 1.00 0.00 0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER MITIG8 - 2008 Plus Project Wed Jun 4, 2008 11:25:36 Page 1-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #25 SR 28/SR 267 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 75 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.905 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 31.8 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Street Name: SR 267 SR 28 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 6 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 1 0 2 402 1 259 190 765 1 2 704 368 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 1 0 2 402 1 259 190 765 1 2 704 368 Added Vol: 0 0 0 7 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 7 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 1 0 2 409 1 264 195 765 1 2 704 375 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.10 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 1 0 2 431 1 278 205 805 1 2 741 434 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 1 0 2 431 1 278 205 805 1 2 741 434 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 1 0 2 431 1 278 205 805 1 2 741 434 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.71 0.71 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 Lanes: 0.33 0.00 0.67 0.99 0.01 1.00 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 1.26 0.74 Final Sat.: 540 0 1080 1350 3 1615 1805 3795 5 1805 2264 1327 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.32 0.17 0.11 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.33 0.33 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.35 0.00 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.13 0.35 0.35 0.13 0.36 0.36 Volume/Cap: 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.90 0.90 0.49 0.90 0.60 0.60 0.01 0.90 0.90 Delay/Veh: 15.8 0.0 15.8 43.6 43.6 19.6 67.5 20.6 20.6 28.2 31.9 31.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 15.8 0.0 15.8 43.6 43.6 19.6 67.5 20.6 20.6 28.2 31.9 31.9 LOS by Move: B A B D D B E C C C C C HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 14 14 5 8 8 8 0 17 17 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER 2008 Plus Project Tue Jun 3, 2008 16:08:55 Page 30-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM 4 -Way Stop Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #26 DPR / DPR Extension ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.572 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 13.8 Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 204 309 187 0 0 133 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 204 309 187 0 0 133 0 Added Vol: 15 12 1 0 17 13 4 81 19 1 93 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 15 12 1 0 17 217 313 268 19 1 226 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 16 13 1 0 18 228 329 282 20 1 238 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 16 13 1 0 18 228 329 282 20 1 238 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 16 13 1 0 18 228 329 282 20 1 238 0 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.92 0.08 1.00 0.07 0.93 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.01 0.99 0.00 Final Sat.: 438 433 36 480 41 529 576 625 705 3 573 0 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.43 0.43 0.57 0.45 0.03 0.42 0.42 xxxx Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Delay/Veh: 10.5 9.9 9.9 0.0 12.8 12.8 16.5 12.8 7.8 13.1 13.1 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 10.5 9.9 9.9 0.0 12.8 12.8 16.5 12.8 7.8 13.1 13.1 0.0 LOS by Move: B A A * B B C B A B B * ApproachDel: 10.2 12.8 14.6 13.1 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: 10.2 12.8 14.6 13.1 LOS by Appr: B B B B AllWayAvgQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.6 1.2 0.8 0.0 0.6 0.6 0.6 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER 2008 Plus Project Tue Jun 3, 2008 16:08:55 Page 31-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #27 DRP Extension / Glenshire Dr ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 6.9 Worst Case Level Of Service: C[ 23.0] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 187 0 0 0 0 436 0 166 191 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 187 0 0 0 0 436 0 166 191 0 Added Vol: 40 0 31 0 0 0 0 3 41 31 1 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 40 0 218 0 0 0 0 439 41 197 192 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 42 0 229 0 0 0 0 462 43 207 202 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 42 0 229 0 0 0 0 462 43 207 202 0 I II II II I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 6.4 6.5 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx I II II II Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 1079 1079 462 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 505 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 244 220 604 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1070 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 208 178 604 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1070 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.20 0.00 0.38 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.19 xxxx xxxx II II II I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.7 xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 9.2 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * A * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx 466 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx 3.6 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx 23.0 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: C * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: 23.0 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: C * * * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER MITIG8 - 2008 Plus Project Wed Jun 4, 2008 11:27:57 Page 1-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #28 89 south / DPR ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.067 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 71.1 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: E ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 428 76 193 82 191 86 107 412 482 289 574 105 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 428 76 193 82 191 86 107 412 482 289 574 105 Added Vol: 40 1 0 1 1 0 0 26 35 14 27 1 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 468 77 193 83 192 86 107 438 517 303 601 106 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 493 81 203 87 202 91 113 461 544 319 633 112 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 493 81 203 87 202 91 113 461 544 319 633 112 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 493 81 203 87 202 91 113 461 544 319 633 112 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.96 0.96 0.85 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 0.86 0.14 1.00 0.46 1.06 0.48 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1565 257 1615 791 1831 820 1805 1900 1615 1805 1900 1615 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.31 0.31 0.13 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.06 0.24 0.34 0.18 0.33 0.07 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.08 0.32 0.32 0.17 0.41 0.41 Volume/Cap: 1.07 1.07 0.43 1.07 1.07 1.07 0.82 0.77 1.07 1.07 0.82 0.17 Delay/Veh: 93.1 93.1 29.0 111.4 111 111.4 76.6 36.9 93.1 112.6 33.5 19.1 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 93.1 93.1 29.0 111.4 111 111.4 76.6 36.9 93.1 112.6 33.5 19.1 LOS by Move: F F C F F F E D F F C B HCM2kAvgQ: 27 27 5 11 11 11 6 14 26 17 19 2 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER MITIG8 - 2008 Winter Plus PWed Jun 4, 2008 16:22:55 Page 1-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 SR 89 South/West River Street ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.718 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 13.1 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Street Name: SR 89 West River Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1369 163 200 414 0 0 0 0 101 0 157 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1369 163 200 414 0 0 0 0 101 0 157 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 1441 172 211 436 0 0 0 0 106 0 165 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1441 172 211 436 0 0 0 0 106 0 165 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 1441 172 211 436 0 0 0 0 106 0 165 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.95 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 0.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 0 3610 1615 1805 1900 0 0 0 0 1805 0 1615 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.40 0.11 0.12 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.10 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.56 0.56 0.16 0.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.24 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.72 0.19 0.72 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.42 Delay/Veh: 0.0 11.1 6.7 32.1 3.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 42.5 0.0 19.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 11.1 6.7 32.1 3.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 42.5 0.0 19.8 LOS by Move: A B A C A A A A A D A B HCM2kAvgQ: 0 12 2 5 3 0 0 0 0 4 0 3 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER MITIG8 - 2008 Winter Plus PWed Jun 4, 2008 16:32:41 Page 1-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #23 SR 267/Airport Road/Schaffer Mill Road ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.951 Loss Time (sec): 16 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 44.9 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Approach: Movement: L - T - R L I II Control: Rights: Min. Green: Lanes: Protected Include 0 0 1 0 0 1 SR 267 Airport Road/Schaffer Mill Road North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound - T - R L - T - R L - T - R II II Protected Include 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 15 Growth Adj: 1.00 Initial Bse: 15 User Adj: 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 PHF Volume: 16 Reduct Vol: Reduced Vol: PCE Adj: MLF Adj: FinalVolume: Saturation Sat/Lane: Adjustment: Lanes: Final Sat.: 0 16 1.00 1.00 1 6 II Split Phase Include 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 II II Split Phase Include 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1036 37 115 477 28 111 4 45 34 4 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1036 37 115 477 28 111 4 45 34 4 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1091 39 121 502 29 117 4 47 36 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1091 39 121 502 29 117 4 47 36 4 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1091 39 121 502 29 117 4 47 36 4 II II II Flow Module: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.96 0.96 1.00 0.97 0.03 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.03 1.00 0.89 0.11 1805 1825 65 1805 1900 1615 1750 63 1615 1627 191 I II II II Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.01 0.60 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.02 0.63 Volume/Cap: 0.39 0.95 Delay/Veh: 64.0 36.3 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 64.0 36.3 LOS by Move: E D HCM2kAvgQ: 1 44 ******************************************************************************** 142 1.00 142 1.00 0.95 149 0 149 1.00 1.00 149 1900 0.85 1.00 1615 0.60 0.07 0.26 0.02 0.07 0.07 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.09 **** **** **** 0.63 0.07 0.68 0.68 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.95 0.95 0.39 0.03 0.95 0.95 0.42 0.23 0.23 0.95 36.3 119.9 8.7 6.4 119.9 120 55.9 50.6 50.6 110.8 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 36.3 119.9 8.7 6.4 119.9 120 55.9 50.6 50.6 110.8 D F A A F F E D D F 44 8 8 0 8 8 2 2 2 9 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER MITIG8 - 2008 Winter Plus PWed Jun 4, 2008 17:33:29 Page 1-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #24 267 / Northstar Dr ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 60 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED ******************************************************************************** Critical Vol./Cap.(X): Average Delay (sec/veh): Level Of Service: 0.596 15.6 B Approach: North Bound Movement: L - T - R I II Control: Protected Rights: Include Min. Green: 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 41 340 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 41 340 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 43 358 Reduct Vol: 0 0 Reduced Vol: 43 358 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 43 358 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: Adjustment: Lanes: Final Sat.: 1900 1900 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1805 1900 South Bound L - T - R 0 0 0 II Protected Include 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 East Bound West Bound L - T - R L - T - R II II Protected Include 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 II Protected Include 0 0 0 0 0 II 0 0 0 0 0 0 395 160 747 0 359 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 0 395 160 747 0 359 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0 0 416 168 786 0 378 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 416 168 786 0 378 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 0 416 168 786 0 378 0 0 II II II 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.92 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 1900 1615 3502 0 1615 0 0 II II II 0 1.00 0 1.00 0.95 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 0 1900 1.00 0.00 0 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.10 0.22 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.04 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.39 0.00 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.60 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.60 0.28 0.57 0.00 0.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 41.1 13.4 0.0 0.0 16.8 13.7 14.9 0.0 16.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 41.1 13.4 0.0 0.0 16.8 13.7 14.9 0.0 16.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: D B A A B B B A B A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 2 5 0 0 7 2 7 0 6 0 0 0 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER MITIG8 - 2008 Winter Plus PWed Jun 4, 2008 16:35:25 Page 1-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #25 SR 28/SR 267 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 70 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.883 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 31.0 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Approach: Movement: L SR 267 SR 28 North Bound - T - R II South Bound L - T - R II East Bound West Bound L - T - R L - T - R II Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 6 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 I II II II Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 309 0 546 250 668 1 18 507 278 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 309 0 546 250 668 1 18 507 278 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 325 0 575 263 703 1 19 534 293 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 325 0 575 263 703 1 19 534 293 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 325 0 575 263 703 1 19 534 293 I II II II Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 0 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1.00 0.71 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 1.29 0 1357 0 1615 1805 3794 6 1805 2324 II II II Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: A A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 6 ******************************************************************************** 1900 0.95 0.71 1274 0.00 0.36 0.15 0.19 0.19 0.01 0.23 0.23 **** **** **** 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.40 0.17 0.29 0.29 0.13 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.59 0.00 0.88 0.88 0.64 0.64 0.08 0.88 0.88 0.0 18.2 0.0 32.8 53.6 22.9 22.9 26.6 34.8 34.8 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0 18.2 0.0 32.8 53.6 22.9 22.9 26.6 34.8 34.8 A B A C D C C C C C 0 15 9 8 8 0 12 12 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER 2008 Plus Project Mitigated MITIG8 - 2008 Plus Project Wed Jun 4, 2008 12:17:59 Page 1-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 West River/McIver Crossing ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 5.9 Worst Case Level Of Service: C[ 20.4] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: McIver Crossing Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Stop Sign Rights: Include Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 I II Volume Module: Base Vol: 5 3 11 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 5 3 11 Added Vol: 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 5 3 11 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 5 3 12 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 5 3 12 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 7.1 6.5 FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 1168 1171 378 Potent Cap.: 172 194 673 Move Cap.: 119 171 673 Total Cap: 244 313 xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.02 0.01 0.02 Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: Movement: LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx 409 xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx 0.2 xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx 14.2 xxxxx II II II Shared LOS: ApproachDel: ApproachLOS: ******************************************************************************** * B 14.2 B * Stop Sign Include 0 1 0 0 1 II Uncontrolled Include 1 0 0 1 0 II West River West Bound L - T - R Uncontrolled Include 0 1 0 0 1 177 8 123 101 299 10 5 301 148 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 177 8 123 101 299 10 5 301 148 0 0 13 15 55 0 0 62 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 177 8 136 116 354 10 5 363 148 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 186 8 143 122 373 11 5 382 156 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 186 8 143 122 373 11 5 382 156 II II II 6.2 7.1 6.5 3.3 3.5 4.0 II 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx II II I 1022 1020 382 216 239 670 190 210 670 355 366 xxxxx 0.53 0.02 0.21 II II 538 xxxx xxxxx 1041 xxxx xxxxx 1041 xxxx xxxxx XXXX xxxx xxxxx 0.12 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.8 0.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 11.8 8.9 xxxx xxxxx * * B A * * LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT 355 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 26.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx D * * * * * 20.4 C XXXXXX * 383 1186 1186 XXXX 0.00 XXXX xxxx xxxx XXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXX 0.0 xxxx 8.0 xxxx A LT - LTR XXXX xxxx 0.0 xxxx 8.0 xxxx A xxxxxx * XXXXX XXXXX * - RT XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER 12008 Plus Project w/ mittigation signalized DPR / Bridge Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR All Delay /Veh (s) 82 .8 85.3 64 .4 45.5 16 .1 2 .2 56 .3 26 .7 17.6 50.9 48.6 33.1 47.5 6: W River St & Bridge Performance by movement Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR All Delay / Veh (s) 297.7 372.1 193 .2 53 .1 49 .8 30 .7 102 .3 20.2 15 .2 28.1 22.1 19.7 79 .3 MITIG8 - 2008 Plus Project Tue Sep 23, 2008 15:34:12 Page 1-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #10 DPR/ Church ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 13.4 Worst Case Level Of Service: E[ 36.1] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Approach: Movement: Control: Rights: Lanes: DPR North Bound South Bound L - T - R L - T - R Uncontrolled Include 0 0 1! 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 17 303 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 17 303 Added Vol: 0 16 PasserByVol: 0 0 Initial Fut: 17 319 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 18 336 Reduct Vol: 0 0 FinalVolume: 18 336 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx II II Uncontrolled Include 0 0 1! 0 0 Church East Bound West Bound L - T - R L - T - R II II Stop Sign Include 0 0 1! 0 0 II II Stop Sign Include 1 0 0 1 0 7 26 154 37 25 5 8 42 38 64 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 26 154 37 25 5 8 42 38 64 0 65 27 0 0 70 0 4 92 87 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 91 181 37 25 75 8 46 130 151 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 7 96 191 39 26 79 8 48 137 159 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 96 191 39 26 79 8 48 137 II II II xxxxx xxxxx II Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 229 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 1350 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 1350 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.01 xxxx xxxx 0.08 xxxx xxxx 0.23 0.27 II II Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: Control Del: LOS by Move: Movement: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 II II 343 xxxx xxxxx 925 781 1227 xxxx xxxxx 252 329 1227 xxxx xxxxx 115 298 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 7.7 xxxx xxxxx A LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx Shared LOS: ApproachDel: xxxxxx ApproachLOS: ******************************************************************************** 0.3 xxxx 8.2 xxxx A LT - LTR xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx * * xxxx xxxx xxxx * * * xxxxxx * xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx * * * - RT LT - LTR xxxxx xxxx 226 xxxxx xxxxx 2.6 xxxxx xxxxx 36.1 E 36.1 E 0 159 6.2 3.3 210 821 796 339 835 296 322 707 835 217 292 707 0.01 0.22 0.47 0.22 II xxxxx 0.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 26.3 xxxx xxxxx - RT LT - LTR - RT xxxxx xxxx xxxx 426 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 5.2 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 30.5 * * 29.9 D D Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER MITIG8 - 2008 Plus Project Wed Jun 4, 2008 12:22:57 Page 1-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #28 89 south / DPR ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 90 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.975 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 52.5 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ovl Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 428 76 193 82 191 86 107 412 482 289 574 105 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 428 76 193 82 191 86 107 412 482 289 574 105 Added Vol: 40 1 0 1 1 0 0 26 35 14 27 1 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 468 77 193 83 192 86 107 438 517 303 601 106 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 493 81 203 87 202 91 113 461 544 319 633 112 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 493 81 203 87 202 91 113 461 544 319 633 112 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 493 81 203 87 202 91 113 461 544 319 633 112 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.96 0.96 0.85 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 0.86 0.14 1.00 0.46 1.06 0.48 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1565 257 1615 791 1831 820 1805 1900 1615 1805 1900 1615 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.31 0.31 0.13 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.06 0.24 0.34 0.18 0.33 0.07 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.07 0.25 0.57 0.18 0.36 0.36 Volume/Cap: 0.97 0.97 0.39 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.92 0.97 0.59 0.97 0.92 0.19 Delay/Veh: 60.7 60.7 24.1 78.5 78.5 78.5 98.4 68.2 13.4 79.4 44.9 19.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 60.7 60.7 24.1 78.5 78.5 78.5 98.4 68.2 13.4 79.4 44.9 19.8 LOS by Move: E E C E E E F E B E D B HCM2kAvgQ: 22 22 5 10 10 10 6 18 10 14 21 2 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER 2025 No Project 2025 No Project w/ DT DiverWed May 28, 2008 13:53:40 Page 6-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 SR 89 South/West River Street ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): Loss Time (sec): Optimal Cycle: ******************************************************************************** 60 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 60 Level Of Service: 0.651 15.6 B Street Name: Approach: North Bound Movement: L - T - R SR 89 South Bound L - T - R II West River Street East Bound West Bound L - T - R L - T - R II II I Control: Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 I II II II Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 653 295 220 684 0 0 0 0 239 0 96 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 653 295 220 684 0 0 0 0 239 0 96 Added Vol: 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 653 298 224 684 0 0 0 0 243 0 100 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 687 314 236 720 0 0 0 0 256 0 105 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 687 314 236 720 0 0 0 0 256 0 105 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 687 314 236 720 0 0 0 0 256 0 105 I II II II Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.95 Lanes: 0.00 2.00 Final Sat.: 0 3610 Protected Ovl 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1615 1805 1900 0 0 0 0 1805 0 1615 II II II Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.19 0.19 0.13 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.07 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.35 0.35 0.23 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.45 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.55 0.56 0.56 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.65 0.00 0.14 Delay/Veh: 0.0 16.3 17.1 21.9 9.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.2 0.0 9.7 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 16.3 17.1 21.9 9.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.2 0.0 9.7 LOS by Move: A B B C A A A A A C A A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 6 5 5 10 0 0 0 0 6 0 1 ******************************************************************************** 1 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER 2025 No Project w/ DT DiverWed May 28, 2008 13:53:40 Page 7-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 West River/McIver Crossing ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 127.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: F[523.4] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: McIver Crossing West River Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 3 9 9 227 9 103 261 427 4 8 268 78 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 3 9 9 227 9 103 261 427 4 8 268 78 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 7 0 0 8 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 3 9 9 227 9 104 262 434 4 8 276 78 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 3 9 9 239 9 109 276 457 4 8 291 82 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 3 9 9 239 9 109 276 457 4 8 291 82 I II II II Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx I II II II I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 1418 1400 459 1327 1320 291 373 xxxx xxxxx 461 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 116 142 606 134 158 753 1197 xxxx xxxxx 1111 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 76 108 606 101 121 753 1197 xxxx xxxxx 1111 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.04 0.09 0.02 2.37 0.08 0.15 0.23 xxxx xxxx 0.01 xxxx xxxx I II II II I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.5 0.9 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 10.6 8.9 xxxx xxxxx 8.3 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * B A * A * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx 153 xxxxx 101 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx 0.5 xxxxx 22.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx 32.5 xxxxx 749.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * D * F * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: 32.5 523.4 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: D F * * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II Control: Yield Sign Yield Sign Yield Sign Yield Sign Lanes: 1 1 1 0 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 76 510 0 0 438 264 147 0 200 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 76 510 0 0 438 264 147 0 200 0 0 0 Added Vol: 1 10 0 0 9 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 77 520 0 0 447 264 147 0 201 0 0 0 Movement Summary DPR/McIver 2025 Summer PM No Project Roundabout Vehicle Movements 95% Mov Dem Deg of Aver Level Back ID Turn Flow %HV Satn Delay of of (veh/h) (v/c) (sec) Service Queue (ft) Prop. Eff. Stop Queued Rate Aver Speed (mph) DPR 3L L 84 2.4 0.553 9.8 LOS A 153 0.57 0.64 26.1 8T T 565 1.9 0.553 6.5 LOS A 153 0.57 0.56 29.3 Approach 649 2.0 0.553 6.9 LOS A 153 0.57 0.57 28.8 DPR 4T T 486 2.1 0.554 5.5 LOS A 102 0.25 0.47 32.6 4R R 287 2.1 0.554 6.3 LOS A 102 0.25 0.52 32.0 Approach 773 2.1 0.554 5.8 LOS A 102 0.25 0.49 32.4 Mc Iver 5L L 162 1.9 0.429 12.2 LOS B 83 0.66 0.81 22.0 2R R 218 1.8 0.429 6.6 LOS A 83 0.66 0.71 22.8 Approach 379 1.8 0.429 9.0 LOS A 83 0.66 0.75 22.4 All Vehicles 1801 2.0 0.554 6.9 LOS A 153 0.45 0.57 28.4 2025 No Project w/ DT DiverWed May 28, 2008 13:53:40 Page 9-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 DPR/I80 Central WB off Ramp ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 9.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: E[ 39.1] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound Movement: L - T - R II South Bound East Bound West Bound L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R II II Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Channel Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 423 0 0 552 0 55 0 245 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 423 0 0 552 0 55 0 245 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 8 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 431 0 0 559 0 55 0 245 0 0 1 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 454 0 0 588 0 58 0 258 0 0 1 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 454 0 0 588 0 58 0 258 0 0 1 I II II II Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 xxxx 6.2 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 xxxx 3.3 I II II II Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1042 1042 588 1171 xxxx 454 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 210 231 512 171 xxxx 610 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 209 231 512 85 xxxx 610 Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.28 0.00 0.50 0.00 xxxx 0.00 II II II I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.0 Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 10.9 LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * * * B Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 405 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 6.7 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 39.1 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * E * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 39.1 10.9 ApproachLOS: * * E B ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER 2025 No Project w/ DT DiverWed May 28, 2008 13:53:40 Page 10-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 I-80 BB / DPR Central / High St ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 2.4 Worst Case Level Of Service: C[ 23.2] ******************************************************************************** Approach: Movement: Control: Rights: Lanes: North Bound South Bound L - T - R L - T - R Uncontrolled Include 0 0 1 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 503 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 503 Added Vol: 0 10 PasserByVol: 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 513 1.00 0.95 540 User Adj: 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 540 1.00 0.95 0 0 0 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1039 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx II Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx II II Uncontrolled Include 0 1 0 0 0 0 43 638 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 43 638 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 43 645 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 45 679 0 II XXXXX XXXXX II 0 0 0 45 679 0 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx XXXXX 540 LOS by Move: Movement: * * * LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx Shared LOS: ApproachDel: xxxxxx ApproachLOS: ******************************************************************************** XXXX XXXXX * * 1039 0.04 XXXX xxxx xxxx XXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXX East Bound West Bound L - T - R L - T - R II II Stop Sign Include 0 0 1! 0 0 II II II II Stop Sign Include 0 0 0 0 1 20 0 100 0 0 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 0 100 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 101 0 0 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 21 0 106 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 0 106 0 0 3 II 7.1 6.5 6.2 xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 xxxxx II 1311 1309 137 161 132 153 0.16 0.00 II 679 455 455 0.23 II XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 6.2 xxxx 3.3 XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 540 546 546 0.01 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 0.0 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 11.6 B - RT XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX * * * LT - LTR XXXX 324 XXXXX 1.8 XXXXX 23.2 * C 23.2 C * * * - RT LT - LTR XXXXX xxxx xxxx XXXXX xxxxx xxxx XXXXX XXXXX XXXX * * * 11.6 B Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER 2025 No Project w/ DT DiverWed May 28, 2008 13:53:40 Page 11-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 DPR/Spring ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 7.4 Worst Case Level Of Service: F[ 53.5] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 3 2 0 27 0 386 273 470 0 0 46 56 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 3 2 0 27 0 386 273 470 0 0 46 56 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 11 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 3 2 0 27 0 386 273 480 0 0 57 56 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 3 2 0 28 0 406 287 505 0 0 60 59 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 3 2 0 28 0 406 287 505 0 0 60 59 I II II II I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 7.1 6.5 xxxxx 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx I II II II I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 1373 1199 xxxxx 1141 1140 60 119 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 124 187 xxxxx 179 203 1011 1482 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 61 144 xxxxx 146 156 1011 1482 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.05 0.01 xxxx 0.19 0.00 0.40 0.19 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx I II II II I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.7 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 8.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * A * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: 79 xxxx xxxxx xxxx 729 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue: 0.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 4.0 xxxxx 0.7 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel: 53.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 17.0 xxxxx 8.0 xxxx xxxxx 9.0 xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: F * * * C * A * * A * * ApproachDel: 53.5 17.0 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: F C * * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER MITIG8 - 2025 No Project w/Fri May 16, 2008 11:08:03 Page 1-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #8 Bridge and Church ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 3.3 Worst Case Level Of Service: C[ 21.2] ******************************************************************************** Approach: Movement: Control: Rights: Lanes: North Bound L - T - R Uncontrolled Include 0 0 0 1 0 II South Bound East Bound West Bound L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R II II Uncontrolled Include 0 1 0 0 0 I II II Stop Sign Include 0 0 1! 0 0 II Stop Sign Include 0 0 1! 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 296 17 35 393 0 19 7 13 36 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 296 17 35 393 0 19 7 13 36 0 Added Vol: 0 0 27 4 0 0 0 0 0 33 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 296 44 39 393 0 19 7 13 69 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 312 46 41 414 0 20 7 14 73 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 312 46 41 414 0 20 7 14 73 0 I II II II Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 358 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1212 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1212 xxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.03 xxxx I II Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: Movement: LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx Shared LOS: ApproachDel: ApproachLOS: ******************************************************************************** XXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXXX * * XXXXXX * 0.1 8.1 A XXXX XXXX * 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 II II II 843 854 286 298 XXXXX 268 288 XXXX 0.07 0.03 II XXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXX * * LT - LTR - RT XXXX xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx 8.1 xxxx A xxxxxx * 414 643 643 0.02 XXXX XXXX * LT - LTR XXXX 338 XXXXX xxxxx 0.4 XXXXX xxxxx 17.1 * * C 17.1 C II 841 287 268 0.27 831 308 297 0.00 19 1.00 19 5 0 24 1.00 0.95 25 0 25 6.2 3.3 335 712 712 0.04 XXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXX * * - RT XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX * XXXX XXXX * XXXXX XXXXX * LT - LTR - RT XXXX 319 xxxxx XXXXX 1.3 xxxxx XXXXX 21.2 xxxxx * C 21.2 C Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER 2025 No Project w/ DT DiverWed May 28, 2008 13:53:40 Page 14-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #9 Jiboom and Bridge ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): OVERFLOW Worst Case Level Of Service: F[xxxxx] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II I I I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 3 302 62 27 246 116 176 258 136 41 115 36 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 3 302 62 27 246 116 176 258 136 41 115 36 Added Vol: 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 3 306 62 27 250 116 176 258 136 41 115 36 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 3 322 65 28 263 122 185 272 143 43 121 38 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 3 322 65 28 263 122 185 272 143 43 121 38 I II II II Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx I I I II II I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 1133 959 343 1134 1012 140 159 xxxx xxxxx 415 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 182 259 704 181 241 913 1433 xxxx xxxxx 1155 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 0 213 704 0 199 913 1433 xxxx xxxxx 1155 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx 1.51 0.09 xxxx 1.33 0.13 0.13 xxxx xxxx 0.04 xxxx xxxx I II II II I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.4 xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.9 xxxx xxxxx 8.2 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * A * * A * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx 0 xxxxx xxxx 0 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: F F * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER 2025 No Project w/ DT DiverWed May 28, 2008 13:53:40 Page 15-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #10 DPR/ Church ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 6.8 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 11.0] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: DPR Church Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 27 31 0 7 56 16 19 5 8 13 7 45 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 27 31 0 7 56 16 19 5 8 13 7 45 Added Vol: 0 0 0 17 1 0 0 31 0 1 37 21 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 27 31 0 24 57 16 19 36 8 14 44 66 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 28 33 0 25 60 17 20 38 8 15 46 69 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 28 33 0 25 60 17 20 38 8 15 46 69 I II II II I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 I II II II I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 77 xxxx xxxxx 33 xxxx xxxxx 266 208 68 232 217 33 Potent Cap.: 1535 xxxx xxxxx 1592 xxxx xxxxx 690 692 1000 728 685 1047 Move Cap.: 1535 xxxx xxxxx 1592 xxxx xxxxx 594 668 1000 672 661 1047 Volume/Cap: 0.02 xxxx xxxx 0.02 xxxx xxxx 0.03 0.06 0.01 0.02 0.07 0.07 II II II I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.1 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 7.4 xxxx xxxxx 7.3 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * A * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 671 xxxxx xxxx 824 xxxxx SharedQueue: 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 0.3 xxxxx xxxxx 0.6 xxxxx Shrd ConDel: 7.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 11.0 xxxxx xxxxx 10.2 xxxxx Shared LOS: A * * * * * B * * B * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 11.0 10.2 ApproachLOS: * * B B ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER 2025 No Project w/ DT DiverWed May 28, 2008 13:53:40 Page 16-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #11 DPR / Keiser ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 6.6 Worst Case Level Of Service: C[ 18.0] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 2 226 0 0 149 109 278 0 2 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 2 226 0 0 149 109 278 0 2 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 2 238 0 0 157 115 293 0 2 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 2 238 0 0 157 115 293 0 2 0 0 0 I II II II I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 6.5 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx I II II II I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 272 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 456 456 214 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 1303 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 566 503 831 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 1303 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 565 503 831 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.52 0.00 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx I II II II I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 7.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 566 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 3.0 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel: 7.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 18.0 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: A * * * * * C * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 18.0 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * C * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER 2025 No Project w/ DT DiverWed May 28, 2008 13:53:40 Page 17-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #12 DPR/Glenshire Drive ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 12.4 Worst Case Level Of Service: D[ 33.6] ******************************************************************************** Approach: Movement: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R II II II I Control: Stop Sign Rights: Include Lanes: 1 0 0 0 1 II Volume Module: Base Vol: 114 Growth Adj: 1.00 Initial Bse: 114 User Adj: 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 PHF Volume: 120 Reduct Vol: 0 FinalVolume: 120 Stop Sign Include 0 0 0 0 Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Include Include 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 II II I 0 287 0 0 0 0 267 309 491 126 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 287 0 0 0 0 267 309 491 126 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0 302 0 0 0 0 281 325 517 133 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 302 0 0 0 0 281 325 517 133 0 II II II I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 5.6 xxxx 6.2 xxxxx xxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx I II Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 1610 xxxx 444 Potent Cap.: 166 xxxx 618 Move Cap.: 97 xxxx 618 Total Cap: 158 108 xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.76 xxxx XXXX XXXX XXXX 0 0.49 xxxx II Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 4.7 xxxx 2.7 Control Del: 77.3 xxxx 16.3 LOS by Move: F * C Movement: LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx Shared LOS: ApproachDel: ApproachLOS: ******************************************************************************** * * 33.6 D xxxxx XXXXX xxxxx XXXX XXXXX * XXXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXX II XXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXXX 0 XXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX II XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXX * * * XXXXX XXXXX II 4.1 xxxx 2.2 xxxx XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX 606 xxxx XXXXX 982 xxxx XXXXX 982 xxxx XXXXX xxxx xxxx XXXX 0.53 xxxx II XXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXXX * * LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT XXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX * * XXXXXX * XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX * * * XXXXXX * 3.2 xxxx 12.7 xxxx B LT - LTR - RT XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX * * * XXXXXX * XXXXX XXXXX * XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX * Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER 2025 No Project w/ DT DiverWed May 28, 2008 13:53:40 Page 18-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #13 I-80 EB/DPR Eastern ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 166.3 Worst Case Level Of Service: F[468.3] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: DPR I-80 EB Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 648 0 0 493 0 445 0 196 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 648 0 0 493 0 445 0 196 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 18 0 0 12 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 666 0 0 505 0 445 0 200 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 701 0 0 532 0 468 0 211 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 701 0 0 532 0 468 0 211 0 0 0 I II II II I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx I II II II I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1233 xxxx 532 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 197 xxxx 552 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 197 xxxx 552 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 2.37 xxxx 0.38 xxxx xxxx xxxx I II II II I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 38.5 xxxx 1.8 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 671.8 xxxx 15.5 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * F * C * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 468.3 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * F * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER 2025 No Project w/ DT DiverWed May 28, 2008 13:53:41 Page 19-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #14 I-80 WB/DPR Eastern ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 0.8 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 10.1] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: DPR I-80 WB Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R II II II I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 142 885 0 0 486 219 0 0 0 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 142 885 0 0 486 219 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added Vol: 5 13 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 147 898 0 0 498 219 0 0 0 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 155 945 0 0 524 231 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 155 945 0 0 524 231 0 0 0 0 0 0 I II II II I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx I II II II I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 755 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 865 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 865 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.18 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx I II II II I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.6 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 10.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: B * * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * * * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER 2025 No Project w/ DT DiverWed May 28, 2008 13:53:41 Page 20-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #15 DPR/Pioneer Trail ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 1022.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: F[3449.7] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound Movement: L - T - R Control: Rights: Lanes: Uncontrolled Include 1 0 0 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 190 Growth Adj: 1.00 Initial Bse: 190 Added Vol: 2 PasserByVol: 0 Initial Fut: 192 User Adj: 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 PHF Volume: 202 Reduct Vol: 0 FinalVolume: 202 II II South Bound L - T - R L II Uncontrolled Include 0 1 0 0 1 II East Bound West Bound - T - R L - T - R II Stop Sign Stop Sign Include Include 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 II 673 19 17 439 497 558 4 226 18 5 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 673 19 17 439 497 558 4 226 18 5 11 0 0 10 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 684 19 17 449 497 558 4 228 18 5 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 720 20 18 473 523 587 4 240 19 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 720 20 18 473 523 587 4 240 19 5 II II II Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx II Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 996 Potent Cap.: 703 Move Cap.: 703 Volume/Cap: 0.29 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 II II 0 17 1.00 17 0 0 17 1.00 0.95 18 0 18 6.2 3.3 xxxx xxxxx 740 xxxx xxxxx 1654 1653 473 2026 2166 730 xxxx xxxxx 876 xxxx xxxxx 79 99 596 43 48 426 xxxx xxxxx 876 xxxx xxxxx 51 69 596 19 33 426 xxxx xxxx 0.02 xxxx xxxx 11.42 0.06 0.40 1.00 0.16 0.04 Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 1.2 xxxx Control Del: 12.2 xxxx LOS by Move: B Movement: LT - LTR Shared Cap.: xxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx Shared LOS: ApproachDel: ApproachLOS: ******************************************************************************** xxxxx XXXXX * - RT xxxx xxxxx XXXX XXXXX xxxx xxxxx * * XXXXXX * II II 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxx 9.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx A LT - LTR - RT xxxx 0.1 9.2 * A xxxx XXXX XXXX XXXXXX * XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX * XXXX XXXX * II XXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXXX * * * * LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR 52 xxxx 527 xxxx 35 70.6 xxxx 2.4 xxxxx 4.4 4866 xxxx 17.6 xxxxx 393 F * C * F 3449.7 392.9 F F - RT XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX * Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Base Vol: 652 270 165 48 395 229 519 167 577 274 83 33 Initial Bse: 652 270 165 48 395 229 519 167 577 274 83 33 Added Vol: 5 0 0 0 0 4 4 2 5 0 1 0 Initial Fut: 657 270 165 48 395 233 523 169 582 274 84 33 SIDRA "' as INTERSECTION ION Movement Summary 89North / DPR 2025 Summer PM No Pro 2 Lane Roundabout Vehicle Movements 95% Mov Dem Deg of Aver Level Back ID Turn Flow %HV Satn Delay of of (veh/h) (v/c) (sec) Service Queue 89 North NB 3L L 8T T 8R R Approach Gray's Xing 0 L 298 2.0 6T T 92 2.2 6R R 36 2.7 Approach 427 2.1 714 2.0 293 2.0 179 2.2 1188 2.0 0.781 0.781 0.616 0.616 (ft) Prop. Eff. Stop Queued Rate 17.9 LOS B 226 0.87 9.7 LOS A 128 0.76 11.2 LOS B 128 0.76 14.9 LOS B 226 0.83 0.638 25.6 LOS C 176 0.377 13.0 LOS B 70 0.378 15.1 LOS B 70 0.638 22.0 LOS C 176 0.99 0.88 0.88 0.96 1.08 0.86 0.93 1.00 1.26 0.95 0.98 1.17 Aver Speed (mph) 27.9 32.4 32.0 29.4 17.5 19.7 19.5 18.0 89 North SB 7L L 53 1.9 0.582 20.9 LOS C 143 0.90 1.07 25.5 4T T 397 2.0 0.586 15.1 LOS B 155 0.91 1.05 29.1 4R R 256 2.0 0.586 15.9 LOS B 155 0.92 1.06 28.6 Approach 706 2.0 0.586 15.8 LOS B 155 0.91 1.05 28.6 DPR 5L L 577 2.1 0.698 12.8 LOS B 173 0.79 1.05 20.9 2T T 186 2.2 0.849 8.3 LOS A 313 0.92 1.21 21.3 2R R 633 2.1 0.851 10.5 LOS B 313 0.92 1.24 21.0 Approach 1396 2.1 0.851 11.1 LOS B 313 0.87 1.16 21.0 All Vehicles 3717 2.0 0.851 14.5 LOS B 313 0.87 1.09 24.0 2025 No Project w/ DT DiverWed May 28, 2008 13:53:41 Page 22-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #17 SR 267 Bypass -SR 89 N/I-80 EB ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): Optimal Cycle: 120 Level Of Service: ******************************************************************************** 1.539 182.4 F Street Name: SR 89 North I 80 EB Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Rights: Min. Green: Lanes: Protected Include 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 II Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 Added Vol: 0 PasserByVol: 0 Initial Fut: 0 User Adj: 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 Reduct Vol: 0 Reduced Vol: 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 Protected Split Phase Include Include 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 II 1 0 0 0 0 II Split Phase Include 0 0 0 0 0 1385 545 438 984 0 57 0 552 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1385 545 438 984 0 57 0 552 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1385 545 443 984 0 57 0 552 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1458 574 466 1036 0 60 0 581 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1458 574 466 1036 0 60 0 581 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1458 574 466 1036 0 60 0 581 0 0 0 II II II Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 0 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1615 1805 1900 0 1809 0 1615 0 0 0 II II II Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.77 0.36 0.26 0.55 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.50 0.50 0.17 0.67 0.00 0.23 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 1.54 0.71 1.54 0.82 0.00 0.14 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 278 26.4 308.6 19.0 0.0 36.6 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 278 26.4 308.6 19.0 0.0 36.6 0.0 LOS by Move: A F C F B A D A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 115 17 39 29 0 2 0 ******************************************************************************** **** **** **** 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 301.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 301.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 F A A A 47 0 0 0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER 2025 No Project w/ DT DiverWed May 28, 2008 13:53:41 Page 23-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #18 SR 267 Bypass/I-80 WB ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.394 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 172.0 Optimal Cycle: 120 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: SR 89 North 1-80 Westbound Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 744 699 0 0 1013 229 0 0 0 410 8 389 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 744 699 0 0 1013 229 0 0 0 410 8 389 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 4 5 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 744 699 0 0 1018 229 0 0 0 410 12 394 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 783 736 0 0 1072 241 0 0 0 432 13 415 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 783 736 0 0 1072 241 0 0 0 432 13 415 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 783 736 0 0 1072 241 0 0 0 432 13 415 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 0.93 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.03 1.00 Final Sat.: 1805 1900 0 0 1900 1615 0 0 0 1708 50 1615 I II II II Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.43 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.56 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.25 0.26 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.31 0.72 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.18 Volume/Cap: 1.39 0.54 0.00 0.00 1.39 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.37 1.37 1.39 Delay/Veh: 229.4 8.4 0.0 0.0 221 25.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 234.9 235 245.6 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 229.4 8.4 0.0 0.0 221 25.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 234.9 235 245.6 LOS by Move: F A A A F C A A A F F F HCM2kAvgQ: 57 13 0 0 77 6 0 0 0 33 33 31 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER 2025 No Project w/ DT DiverWed May 28, 2008 13:53:41 Page 24-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #19 Bridge Street/ West River St ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): OVERFLOW Worst Case Level Of Service: F[xxxxx] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Bridge Street West River St Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II Control: Uncontrolled Rights: Include Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 322 593 18 29 553 75 111 21 557 27 9 48 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 322 593 18 29 553 75 111 21 557 27 9 48 Added Vol: 0 17 0 0 19 9 7 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 322 610 18 29 572 84 118 21 557 27 9 48 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 339 642 19 31 602 88 124 22 586 28 9 51 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 339 642 19 31 602 88 124 22 586 28 9 51 I II II II I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 I II II II I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 691 xxxx xxxxx 661 xxxx xxxxx 2067 2046 646 2341 2081 652 Potent Cap.: 914 xxxx xxxxx 937 xxxx xxxxx 41 57 475 26 54 472 Move Cap.: 914 xxxx xxxxx 937 xxxx xxxxx 20 34 475 0 33 472 Volume/Cap: 0.37 xxxx xxxx 0.03 xxxx xxxx 6.24 0.64 1.23 xxxx 0.29 0.11 I II II II I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 1.7 xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 23.3 xxxx xxxx 0.4 Control Del: 11.2 xxxx xxxxx 9.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 148.9 xxxxx xxxx 13.5 LOS by Move: B * * A * * * * F * * B Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 21 xxxx xxxxx 0 xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 18.6 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3008 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * F * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 719.9 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * F F ******************************************************************************** 1 II Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Include Include Include 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 II II I Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER MITIG8 - 2025 No Project w/Tue Apr 29, 2008 15:53:17 Page 1-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #20 Brockway Road/Palisades Drive ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 65 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.829 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 19.2 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Brockway Road Palisades Drive Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Split Phase Split Phase Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 197 0 154 0 0 0 0 813 333 172 628 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 197 0 154 0 0 0 0 813 333 172 628 0 Added Vol: 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 1 0 16 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 198 0 154 0 0 0 0 831 334 172 644 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 208 0 162 0 0 0 0 875 352 181 678 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 208 0 162 0 0 0 0 875 352 181 678 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 208 0 162 0 0 0 0 875 352 181 678 0 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1805 0 1615 0 0 0 0 1900 1615 1805 1900 0 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.46 0.22 0.10 0.36 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.14 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.56 0.56 0.12 0.68 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.83 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.83 0.39 0.83 0.53 0.00 Delay/Veh: 47.3 0.0 37.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.5 8.5 50.4 5.7 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 47.3 0.0 37.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.5 8.5 50.4 5.7 0.0 LOS by Move: D A D A A A A B A D A A HCM2kAvgQ: 7 0 5 0 0 0 0 17 4 6 7 0 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L- T - R L- T -R L - T -R L- T - R I II II II I Initial Bse: 67 11 131 99 10 68 63 696 80 291 586 103 Added Vol: 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 2 0 12 0 Initial Fut: 69 11 131 99 10 68 63 710 82 291 598 103 Movement Summary Brockway Road/Martis Valley Road 2025 Summer PM No Project Roundabout Vehicle Movements 95% Mov Dem Deg of Aver Level Back ID Turn Flow %HV Satn Delay of of (veh/h) (v/c) (sec) Service Queue (ft) Prop. Eff. Stop Queued Rate Aver Speed (mph) Martis Valley NB 3L L 73 1.4 0.471 21.2 LOS C 118 0.96 1.05 24.5 8T T 12 8.3 0.462 13.2 LOS B 118 0.96 1.03 25.1 8R R 138 2.2 0.469 14.5 LOS B 118 0.96 0.92 25.9 Approach 222 2.3 0.469 16.6 LOS B 118 0.96 0.97 25.4 Brockway WB 0 L 306 2.0 0.816 14.4 LOS B 340 0.77 0.67 29.0 6T T 629 2.1 0.816 8.8 LOS A 340 0.77 0.62 33.0 6R R 108 1.9 0.818 9.2 LOS A 340 0.77 0.61 31.9 Approach 1044 2.0 0.816 10.5 LOS B 340 0.77 0.63 31.6 Martis Valley SB 7L L 104 1.9 0.414 18.7 LOS B 98 0.95 1.03 20.1 4T T 11 9.1 0.407 11.0 LOS B 98 0.95 1.01 21.3 4R R 72 1.4 0.415 13.0 LOS B 98 0.95 0.90 21.7 Approach 186 2.2 0.414 16.1 LOS B 98 0.95 0.98 20.8 Brockway EB 5L L 66 1.5 2T T 747 2.0 2R R 86 2.3 Approach 900 2.0 All Vehicles 2352 2.0 0.943 29.6 LOS C 649 0.946 24.3 LOS C 649 0.946 25.2 LOS C 649 0.945 24.8 LOS C 649 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.946 17.0 LOS B 649 0.89 1.29 1.29 1.23 1.28 21.8 24.8 23.7 24.4 0.94 26.9 2025 No Project w/ DT DiverWed May 28, 2008 13:53:41 Page 27-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #22 SR 267/Brockway Road/Joerger Drive ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): Loss Time (sec): Optimal Cycle: ******************************************************************************** 120 12 120 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.537 Average Delay (sec/veh): 235.5 Level Of Service: F Approach: Movement: North Bound L - T - R Control: Protected Rights: Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 369 Growth Adj: 1.00 Initial Bse: 369 Added Vol: 9 PasserByVol: 0 Initial Fut: 378 User Adj: 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 PHF Volume: 398 Reduct Vol: 0 Reduced Vol: 398 PCE Adj: 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 FinalVolume: 398 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.99 Lanes: 1.00 0.93 Final Sat.: 1805 1746 Capacity Analysis Vol/Sat: 0.22 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.16 Volume/Cap: 1.34 Delay/Veh: 224.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 224.0 LOS by Move: F HCM2kAvgQ: 29 ******************************************************************************** II II South Bound L - T - R II Protected Include 0 0 1 0 1 0 East Bound West Bound L - T - R L - T - R II Split Phase Include 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 II II Split Phase Include 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1106 84 184 820 531 472 186 455 128 233 352 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1106 84 184 820 531 472 186 455 128 233 352 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 10 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1106 84 184 820 531 472 190 465 128 237 352 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1164 88 194 863 559 497 200 489 135 249 371 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1164 88 194 863 559 497 200 489 135 249 371 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1164 88 194 863 559 497 200 489 135 249 371 II II II 1900 1900 0.99 0.95 0.07 1.00 133 1805 II Module: 0.67 0.67 **** 0.43 0.43 0.07 1.54 1.54 1.54 282 281.6 333.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 282 281.6 333.0 F F F 99 99 17 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1.00 0.85 0.97 0.97 0.85 0.98 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.71 0.29 1.00 0.35 0.65 1900 1615 1309 527 1615 655 1213 II II 1900 0.85 1.00 1615 0.11 0.45 0.35 0.38 0.38 0.30 0.21 0.21 0.23 **** **** **** 0.34 0.34 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.15 0.15 0.15 1.34 1.02 1.54 1.54 1.23 1.38 1.38 1.54 203 83.4 297.6 298 167.5 242.0 242 312.3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 203 83.4 297.6 298 167.5 242.0 242 312.3 F F F F F F F F 60 28 56 56 32 29 29 31 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER MITIG8 - 2025 No Project w/Tue Apr 29, 2008 15:55:07 Page 1-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #23 SR 267/Airport Road/Schaffer Mill Road ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.090 Loss Time (sec): 16 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 73.1 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: E ******************************************************************************** Street Name: SR 267 Airport Road/Schaffer Mill Road Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 28 1009 48 107 967 231 337 28 52 60 22 116 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 28 1009 48 107 967 231 337 28 52 60 22 116 Added Vol: 0 6 0 1 7 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 28 1015 48 108 974 232 338 28 52 60 22 117 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 29 1068 51 114 1025 244 356 29 55 63 23 123 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 29 1068 51 114 1025 244 356 29 55 63 23 123 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 29 1068 51 114 1025 244 356 29 55 63 23 123 I II II II Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.96 0.96 0.85 0.97 0.97 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 0.95 0.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.08 1.00 0.73 0.27 1.00 Final Sat.: 1805 1802 85 1805 1900 1615 1677 139 1615 1342 492 1615 I II II II Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.59 0.59 0.06 0.54 0.15 0.21 0.21 0.03 0.05 0.05 0.08 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.02 0.54 0.54 0.06 0.58 0.58 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.07 0.07 0.07 Volume/Cap: 0.92 1.09 1.09 1.09 0.92 0.26 1.09 1.09 0.17 0.67 0.67 1.09 Delay/Veh: 186.1 83.1 83.1 170.9 35.1 12.4 122.4 122 40.5 67.6 67.6 166.6 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 186.1 83.1 83.1 170.9 35.1 12.4 122.4 122 40.5 67.6 67.6 166.6 LOS by Move: F F F F D B F F D E E F HCM2kAvgQ: 3 56 56 8 38 4 22 22 2 4 4 9 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #24 267 / Northstar Dr ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 65 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.842 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 21.1 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 108 531 0 0 815 265 565 0 130 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 108 531 0 0 815 265 565 0 130 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 2 0 0 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 108 533 0 0 818 268 568 0 130 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 114 561 0 0 861 282 598 0 137 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 114 561 0 0 861 282 598 0 137 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 114 561 0 0 861 282 598 0 137 0 0 0 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.92 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1805 1900 0 0 1900 1615 3502 0 1615 0 0 0 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.17 0.17 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.07 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.54 0.20 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.84 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.84 0.32 0.84 0.00 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 65.2 7.2 0.0 0.0 19.1 8.6 33.9 0.0 23.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 65.2 7.2 0.0 0.0 19.1 8.6 33.9 0.0 23.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: E A A A B A C A C A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 5 6 0 0 18 3 9 0 3 0 0 0 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER MITIG8 - 2025 No Project w/Wed Sep 24, 2008 09:23:24 Page 1-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #25 SR 28/SR 267 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 80 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.919 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 33.0 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Street Name: SR 267 SR 28 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 6 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 1 0 3 373 1 298 220 908 1 3 735 481 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 1 0 3 373 1 298 220 908 1 3 735 481 Added Vol: 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 1 0 3 375 1 299 221 908 1 3 735 483 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 1 0 3 395 1 315 233 956 1 3 774 508 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 1 0 3 395 1 315 233 956 1 3 774 508 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 1 0 3 395 1 315 233 956 1 3 774 508 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.71 0.71 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.94 0.94 Lanes: 0.25 0.00 0.75 0.99 0.01 1.00 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 1.21 0.79 Final Sat.: 406 0 1217 1347 4 1615 1805 3796 4 1805 2156 1416 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.19 0.13 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.36 0.36 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.32 0.00 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.14 0.41 0.41 0.12 0.39 0.39 Volume/Cap: 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.92 0.92 0.61 0.92 0.62 0.62 0.01 0.92 0.92 Delay/Veh: 18.6 0.0 18.6 50.8 50.8 25.2 69.4 19.4 19.4 30.9 33.1 33.1 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 18.6 0.0 18.6 50.8 50.8 25.2 69.4 19.4 19.4 30.9 33.1 33.1 LOS by Move: B A B D D C E B B C C C HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 14 14 7 9 10 10 0 20 20 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER 2025 No Project w/ DT DiverWed May 28, 2008 13:53:41 Page 31-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM 4 -Way Stop Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #26 DPR / DPR Extension ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.167 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 8.5 Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 56 107 114 0 0 76 13 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 56 107 114 0 0 76 13 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 6 2 0 7 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 0 0 0 1 56 107 120 2 0 83 13 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 0 1 59 113 126 2 0 87 14 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 0 1 59 113 126 2 0 87 14 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 0 1 59 113 126 2 0 87 14 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.02 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.86 0.14 Final Sat.: 584 636 0 593 13 725 684 755 885 0 639 100 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 xxxx 0.00 0.08 0.08 0.16 0.17 0.00 xxxx 0.14 0.14 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.7 7.7 8.9 8.3 6.7 0.0 8.6 8.6 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.7 7.7 8.9 8.3 6.7 0.0 8.6 8.6 LOS by Move: * * * * A A A A A * A A ApproachDel: xxxxxx 7.7 8.6 8.6 Delay Adj: xxxxx 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: xxxxxx 7.7 8.6 8.6 LOS by Appr: * A A A AllWayAvgQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER 2025 No Project w/ DT DiverWed May 28, 2008 13:53:41 Page 32-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #27 DRP Extension / Glenshire Dr ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 2.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: C[ 19.2] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 114 0 0 0 0 777 0 50 347 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 114 0 0 0 0 777 0 50 347 0 Added Vol: 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 1 0 5 1 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 0 120 0 0 0 0 778 0 55 348 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 0 126 0 0 0 0 819 0 58 366 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 0 126 0 0 0 0 819 0 58 366 0 I II II II I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx I II II II I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx 819 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 819 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx 379 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 818 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx 379 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 818 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx 0.33 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.07 xxxx xxxx I II II II I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx 1.4 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.2 xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx 19.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 9.7 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * C * * * * * * A * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: 19.2 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: C * * * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER MITIG8 - 2025 No Project w/Wed Sep 24, 2008 16:09:32 Page 1-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #28 89 south / DPR ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 110 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.167 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 101.4 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Approach: Movement: Control: Rights: Min. Green: Lanes: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Protected Include 0 0 0 1 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 469 Growth Adj: 1.00 Initial Bse: 469 Added Vol: 1 PasserByVol: 0 Initial Fut: 470 User Adj: 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 PHF Volume: 495 Reduct Vol: 0 Reduced Vol: 495 PCE Adj: 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 FinalVolume: 495 Protected Include 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 II Protected Include 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 ii 1 1 II Protected Include 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 116 218 96 167 79 96 265 464 503 397 60 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 116 218 96 167 79 96 265 464 503 397 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 116 218 96 167 79 96 269 465 504 402 60 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 122 229 101 176 83 101 283 489 531 423 63 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 122 229 101 176 83 101 283 489 531 423 63 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 122 229 101 176 83 101 283 489 531 423 63 II II II Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.96 0.96 Lanes: 0.80 0.20 Final Sat.: 1464 361 Capacity Analysis Vol/Sat: 0.34 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.29 Volume/Cap: 1.17 Delay/Veh: 133.2 User DelAdj: 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 133.2 LOS by Move: F HCM2kAvgQ: 35 ******************************************************************************** **** 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 0.85 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.56 0.98 0.46 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1615 964 1677 793 1805 1900 1615 1805 1900 1615 II II II Module: 0.34 0.14 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.06 0.15 0.30 0.29 0.22 0.04 **** **** **** 0.29 0.29 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.10 0.26 0.26 0.25 0.41 0.41 1.17 0.49 1.17 1.17 1.17 0.54 0.57 1.17 1.17 0.54 0.10 133 33.2 154.5 155 154.5 50.2 37.1 138.8 137.8 25.5 20.1 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 133 33.2 154.5 155 154.5 50.2 37.1 138.8 137.8 25.5 20.1 F C F F F D D F F C C 35 7 13 13 13 4 9 28 30 11 1 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER MITIG8 - 2025 Winter No ProWed Jun 4, 2008 16:39:17 Page 1-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 SR 89 South/West River Street ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 60 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED ******************************************************************************** Critical Vol./Cap.(X): Average Delay (sec/veh): Level Of Service: 0.753 12.3 B Street Name: Approach: North Bound Movement: L - T - R Control: Rights: Min. Green: Lanes: Protected Include 0 0 0 0 2 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 1521 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 1521 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 1601 Reduct Vol: 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 1601 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 1601 SR 89 South Bound L - T - R II Protected Include 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 II West River Street East Bound West Bound L - T - R L - T - R II II Protected Include 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 II Protected Ovl 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 II 247 169 459 0 0 0 0 104 0 14 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 247 169 459 0 0 0 0 104 0 14 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 260 178 483 0 0 0 0 109 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 260 178 483 0 0 0 0 109 0 15 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 260 178 483 0 0 0 0 109 0 15 II II II Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.95 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 3610 1615 1805 1900 0 0 0 0 1805 0 I II II II Capacity Analysis Vol/Sat: 0.00 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 LOS by Move: A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 ******************************************************************************** 1900 0.85 1.00 1615 Module: 0.44 0.16 0.10 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.01 **** **** **** 0.59 0.59 0.13 0.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.21 0.75 0.27 0.75 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.00 0.04 10.7 6.2 38.0 3.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 46.8 0.0 18.9 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 10.7 6.2 38.0 3.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 46.8 0.0 18.9 B A D A A A A A D A B 13 2 5 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER MITIG8 - 2025 Winter No ProWed Jun 4, 2008 16:42:12 Page 1-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #23 SR 267/Airport Road/Schaffer Mill Road ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.450 Loss Time (sec): 16 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 184.5 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Approach: Movement: L North Bound - T - Control: Rights: Min. Green: Lanes: 1 Protected Include 0 0 0 0 1 SR 267 R II Protected Include 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 II Volume Module: Base Vol: 47 Growth Adj: 1.00 Initial Bse: 47 User Adj: 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 PHF Volume: 49 Reduct Vol: 0 Reduced Vol: 49 PCE Adj: 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 FinalVolume: 49 South Bound Airport Road/Schaffer Mill Road East Bound West Bound L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R II II Split Phase Split Phase Include Include 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 II II 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1110 67 213 1067 258 402 41 104 71 72 334 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1110 67 213 1067 258 402 41 104 71 72 334 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 1168 71 224 1123 272 423 43 109 75 76 352 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1168 71 224 1123 272 423 43 109 75 76 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1168 71 224 1123 272 423 43 109 75 76 II II II Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.99 Lanes: 1.00 0.94 Final Sat.: 1805 1776 Capacity Analysis Vol/Sat: 0.03 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.02 Volume/Cap: 1.15 Delay/Veh: 241.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 241.8 LOS by Move: F HCM2kAvgQ: 5 ******************************************************************************** 352 1.00 1.00 352 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.96 0.96 0.85 0.98 0.98 0.85 0.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.09 1.00 0.50 0.50 1.00 107 1805 1900 1615 1650 168 1615 921 934 1615 II II II Module: 0.66 0.66 **** 0.45 0.45 0.09 1.45 1.45 1.45 242 241.7 289.6 1.00 1.00 1.00 242 241.7 289.6 F F F 92 92 19 0.12 0.59 0.17 0.26 0.26 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.22 **** **** **** 0.52 0.52 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.15 0.15 0.15 1.15 0.33 1.45 1.45 0.38 0.54 0.54 1.45 107 17.1 268.4 268 44.5 49.3 49.3 275.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 107 17.1 268.4 268 44.5 49.3 49.3 275.0 F B F F D D D F 61 6 36 36 4 6 6 28 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER MITIG8 - 2025 Winter No ProWed Jun 4, 2008 17:44:13 Page 1-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #24 267 / Northstar Dr ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 90 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.952 Loss Time (sec): Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 37.4 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 94 417 0 0 827 482 1038 0 400 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 94 417 0 0 827 482 1038 0 400 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 99 439 0 0 871 507 1093 0 421 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 99 439 0 0 871 507 1093 0 421 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 99 439 0 0 871 507 1093 0 421 0 0 0 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.92 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1805 1900 0 0 1900 1615 3502 0 1615 0 0 0 I II II II Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.46 0.31 0.31 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.06 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.33 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.95 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.95 0.65 0.95 0.00 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 114.9 12.7 0.0 0.0 41.5 19.6 45.9 0.0 35.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 114.9 12.7 0.0 0.0 41.5 19.6 45.9 0.0 35.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: F B A A D B D A D A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 6 7 0 0 29 11 21 0 13 0 0 0 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER MITIG8 - 2025 Winter No ProWed Jun 4, 2008 17:46:47 Page 1-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #25 SR 28/SR 267 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 90 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.972 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 44.6 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Street Name: SR 267 SR 28 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 6 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 1 0 1 540 7 289 189 748 0 3 616 428 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 1 0 1 540 7 289 189 748 0 3 616 428 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 1 0 1 568 7 304 199 787 0 3 648 451 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 1 0 1 568 7 304 199 787 0 3 648 451 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 1 0 1 568 7 304 199 787 0 3 648 451 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.86 1.00 0.86 0.72 0.72 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.94 0.94 Lanes: 0.50 0.00 0.50 0.99 0.01 1.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 1.18 0.82 Final Sat.: 817 0 817 1341 17 1615 1805 3800 0 1805 2105 1463 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.42 0.19 0.11 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.31 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.44 0.00 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.11 0.33 0.00 0.10 0.32 0.32 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.97 0.43 0.97 0.64 0.00 0.02 0.97 0.97 Delay/Veh: 14.3 0.0 14.3 54.6 54.6 18.0 94.3 26.9 0.0 36.2 50.5 50.5 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 14.3 0.0 14.3 54.6 54.6 18.0 94.3 26.9 0.0 36.2 50.5 50.5 LOS by Move: B A B D D B F C A D D D HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 22 22 6 10 10 0 0 21 21 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER 2025 No Project Mitigated SIDRA INTERSECTION 41.11 am 4141 Movement Summary West River / McIver Xing 2025 Summer PM No Project Mit Roundabout Vehicle Movements 95% Dem Deg of Aver Level Back ID Turn Flow %HV Satn Delay of of (veh/h) (v/c) (sec) Service Queue (ft) Prop. Eff. Stop Queued Rate Aver Speed (mph) Driveway 3L L 3 25.0 0.070 15.0 LOS B 15 0.86 0.86 14.1 8T T 10 9.1 0.070 9.8 LOS A 15 0.86 0.76 13.8 8R R 10 9.1 0.070 10.2 LOS B 15 0.86 0.65 13.7 Approach 26 11.5 0.070 10.8 LOS B 15 0.86 0.73 13.8 West River 0 L 9 10.0 0.435 5.8 LOS A 99 0.65 0.67 21.3 6T T 303 2.0 0.435 4.4 LOS A 99 0.65 0.53 23.2 6R R 86 2.3 0.434 4.6 LOS A 99 0.65 0.57 22.3 Approach 399 2.3 0.435 4.5 LOS A 99 0.65 0.54 23.0 McIver X-ing 7L L 249 2.0 0.358 8.4 LOS A 52 0.42 0.69 24.2 4T T 10 9.1 0.355 5.9 LOS A 52 0.42 0.62 25.5 4R R 114 1.8 0.357 5.8 LOS A 52 0.42 0.57 26.3 Approach 374 2.1 0.358 7.5 LOS A 52 0.42 0.65 24.9 West River 5L L 288 2.1 0.727 12.5 LOS B 251 0.76 0.81 25.3 2T T 477 2.1 0.727 7.1 LOS A 251 0.76 0.74 28.1 2R R 4 20.0 0.714 11.1 LOS B 251 0.76 0.79 27.6 Approach 770 2.2 0.727 9.2 LOS A 251 0.76 0.77 27.0 All 1569 2.4 0.727 7.6 LOS A 251 0.65 0.68 24.9 Vehicles 80' island diameter 15' lane, 1 lane MITIG8 - 2025 No Project w/Tue May 13, 2008 12:14:59 Page 1-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM 4 -Way Stop Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #9 Jiboom and Bridge ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.874 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 32.3 Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 3 302 62 27 246 116 176 258 136 41 115 36 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 3 302 62 27 246 116 176 258 136 41 115 36 Added Vol: 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 3 306 62 27 250 116 176 258 136 41 115 36 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 3 322 65 28 263 122 185 272 143 43 121 38 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 3 322 65 28 263 122 185 272 143 43 121 38 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 3 322 65 28 263 122 185 272 143 43 121 38 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.01 0.82 0.17 0.07 0.64 0.29 1.00 0.65 0.35 0.21 0.60 0.19 Final Sat.: 4 392 79 33 309 143 432 311 164 84 237 74 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.43 0.87 0.87 0.51 0.51 0.51 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Delay/Veh: 33.3 33.3 33.3 36.5 36.5 36.5 16.8 41.2 41.2 17.9 17.9 17.9 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 33.3 33.3 33.3 36.5 36.5 36.5 16.8 41.2 41.2 17.9 17.9 17.9 LOS by Move: D D D E E E C E E C C C ApproachDel: 33.3 36.5 33.7 17.9 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: 33.3 36.5 33.7 17.9 LOS by Appr: D E D C AllWayAvgQ: 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.5 3.5 3.5 0.7 4.1 4.1 0.7 0.7 0.7 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER MITIG8 - 2025 No Project w/Wed May 14, 2008 11:10:01 Page 1-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #13 I-80 EB/DPR Eastern ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.725 Loss Time (sec): 8 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 14.9 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Street Name: DPR I-80 EB Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 648 0 0 493 0 445 0 196 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 648 0 0 493 0 445 0 196 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 18 0 0 12 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 666 0 0 505 0 445 0 200 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 701 0 0 532 0 468 0 211 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 701 0 0 532 0 468 0 211 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 701 0 0 532 0 468 0 211 0 0 0 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 1900 0 0 1900 0 1805 0 1615 0 0 0 II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.73 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.00 0.73 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 14.2 0.0 0.0 10.7 0.0 20.8 0.0 14.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 14.2 0.0 0.0 10.7 0.0 20.8 0.0 14.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: A B A A B A C A B A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 12 0 0 7 0 9 0 3 0 0 0 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER Movement Summary Page 1 of 1 SIDRA INTERSECTION OMR all OM Movement Summary DPR/ I80 EB 2025 Summer PM No Project Roundabout Vehicle Movements Deg of Aver 95% Aver Nov ID Turn (veh/h) %HV Satn Delay Service Level QueuBack e Queued E Rateff. Speed (v/c) (sec) (ft) (mph) DPR NB 8T T 724 1.9 0.903 21.7 LOS C 493 1.00 1.33 22.8 Approach 723 1.9 0.903 21.7 LOS C 493 1.00 1.33 22.8 DPR SB 4T T 549 2.0 0.329 5.2 LOS A 0 0.00 0.46 33.9 Approach 549 2.0 0.329 5.2 LOS A 0.00 0.46 33.9 I 80 EB Off Ramp 5L L 489 2.0 0.759 22.0 LOS C 246 0.80 1.04 29.1 2R R 217 1.8 0.759 17.4 LOS B 246 0.80 1.02 31.4 Approach 706 2.0 0.760 20.6 LOS C 246 0.80 1.03 29.7 All Vehicles 1978 2.0 0.903 16.7 LOS B 493 0.65 0.98 27.6 Symbols which may appear in this table: Following Degree of Saturation # x = 1.00 for Short Lane with resulting Excess Flow * x = 1.00 due to minimum capacity Following LOS # - Based on density for continuous movements Following Queue # - Density for continuous movement Jr. SIDRA SOLUTIONS Site: New Site - 1 P:\Truckee Railyard EIR\TraffixSidraSynchro\Sidra\2025\DPR I80 EB.aap Processed Jun 04, 2008 01:53:58PM A0606, LSC, Inc„ Small Office Produced by SIDRA Intersection 3.2.0.1455 Copyright 2000-2007 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd www.sidrasolutions.com about:blank 9/24/2008 SIDRA INTERSECTION or WO Movement Summary DPR and Pioneer Trail 2025 DPR and Pioneer Trail 2 Lane No Pro Roundabout Vehicle Movements • 95% Dem Deg of Aver Level Back ID Turn Flow %HV Satn Delay of of (veh/h) (v/c) (sec) Service Queue (ft) Prop. Eff. Stop Queued Rate Aver Speed (mph) DPR 3L L 209 1.9 0.609 17.3 LOS B 164 0.84 1.01 26.4 8T T 743 2.0 0.609 10.2 LOS B 169 0.85 0.95 30.1 8R R 21 4.8 0.618 11.7 LOS B 169 0.85 0.96 29.5 Approach 974 2.1 0.609 11.8 LOS B 169 0.85 0.96 29.1 TDRPD 1L L 20 5.0 0.054 15.8 LOS B 9 0.81 0.88 18.1 6T T 5 16.7 0.054 8.1 LOS A 10 0.82 0.79 18.8 6R R 18 5.3 0.054 8.5 LOS A 10 0.82 0.78 18.6 Approach 45 6.7 0.054 11.7 LOS B 10 0.82 0.82 18.3 DPR 7L L 18 5.3 0.452 8.3 LOS A 98 0.53 0.65 26.4 4T T 488 2.0 0.455 5.6 LOS A 98 0.53 0.51 29.8 4R R 540 2.0 0.461 6.1 LOS A 101 0.52 0.57 28.9 Approach 1047 2.1 0.461 5.9 LOS A 101 0.52 0.54 29.3 Pioneer Trail 5L L 607 2.0 0.660 16.1 LOS B 202 0.83 0.97 25.1 2T T 4 20.0 0.385 8.0 LOS A 67 0.68 0.80 28.0 2R R 248 2.0 0.373 9.5 LOS A 67 0.68 0.79 28.6 Approach 859 2.1 0.660 14.2 LOS B 202 0.79 0.92 26.0 All Vehicles 2925 2.2 0.660 10.4 LOS B 202 0.71 0.80 27.9 2 lane roundabout 100' island, 30' circulating width SIDRA INTERSECTION 111111111 ele Movement Summary SR 267 / I80 EB 2025 Summer PM MIT NBR Slip Lane Roundabout Vehicle Movements 95% Dem Deg of Aver Level Back Ip Turn Flow %HV Satn Delay of of (veh/h) (v/c) (sec) Service Queue (ft) Prop. Eff. Stop Queued Rate Aver Speed (mph) 267 NB 8T T 1458 2.0 0.722 14.3 LOS B 226 0.77 0.94 33.9 8R R 592 2.0 0.535 13.2 LOS B 107 0.58 0.79 37.2 Approach 2051 2.0 0.722 14.0 LOS B 226 0.72 0.90 34.9 267 SB 7L L 482 2.1 0.323 13.2 LOS B 0 0.00 0.73 29.9 4T T 574 1.9 0.323 5.6 LOS A 0 0.00 0.46 33.8 Approach 1055 2.0 0.323 9.1 LOS A 0.00 0.58 31.8 I 80 EB Off Ramp 5L L 62 1.6 0.105 17.8 LOS B 10 0.49 0.87 31.5 2T T 1 50.0 0.105 13.0 LOS B 10 0.49 0.79 38.0 2R R 600 2.0 0.574 14.3 LOS B 95 0.60 0.91 36.7 Approach 664 2.1 0.574 14.6 LOS B 95 0.59 0.91 36.2 All Vehicles 3770 2.0 0.722 12.7 LOS B 226 0.49 0.81 34.1 2 Lane, 100' island, 34' circ, NBR Slip Lane SIDRA INTERSECTION Movement Summary SR 267 / 180 WB 2025 Summer PM MIT w/ Loop Ramp NMI 10 11 .. Roundabout Vehicle Movements 95% Dem Deg of Aver Level Back Mov Turn Flow %HV Satn Delay of of (veh/h) (v/c) (sec) Service Queue (ft) Prop. Eff. Stop Queued Rate Aver Speed (mph) 267 NB 3L L 5 16.7 0.222 16.1 LOS B 0 0.00 0.74 33.3 8T T 736 2.0 0.222 3.9 LOS A 0 0.00 0.34 38.7 Approach 742 2.2 0.222 4.0 LOS A 0.00 0.34 38.6 I 80 WB Off Ramp 0 L 432 2.1 0.371 16.7 LOS B 46 0.48 0.81 32.3 6T T 13 7.7 0.371 9.9 LOS A 46 0.48 0.63 39.3 6R R 415 1.9 0.402 10.3 LOS B 52 0.51 0.71 36.7 Approach 859 2.1 0.402 13.5 LOS B 52 0.49 0.76 34.2 267 SB/ SR 89 N 4T T 1072 2.0 0.597 7.5 LOS A 150 0.68 0.66 33.8 4R R 241 2.1 0.597 10.7 LOS B 150 0.68 0.76 34.5 Approach 1312 2.0 0.597 8.1 LOS A 150 0.68 0.68 34.0 All Vehicles 2913 2.1 0.597 8.6 LOS A 150 0.45 0.62 35.0 2 lane, 160' island, 34' circ WB loop ramps in place. Removal of NB left turn volumes. A few NBL still exist for those that "miss" the loop ramp. MITIG8 - 2025 No Project w/Wed May 14, 2008 11:15:17 Page 1-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #22 SR 267/Brockway Road/Joerger Drive ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 80 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.922 Loss Time (sec): 16 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 35.9 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Ovl Ovl Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 I II II II Volume Module: Base Vol: 369 1106 84 184 820 531 472 186 455 128 233 352 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 369 1106 84 184 820 531 472 186 455 128 233 352 Added Vol: 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 10 0 4 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 378 1106 84 184 820 531 472 190 465 128 237 352 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 398 1164 88 194 863 559 497 200 489 135 249 371 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 398 1164 88 194 863 559 497 200 489 135 249 371 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 398 1164 88 194 863 559 497 200 489 135 249 371 I II II II Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3610 3800 1615 1805 3800 1615 3610 1900 1615 1805 1900 1615 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.11 0.31 0.05 0.11 0.23 0.35 0.14 0.11 0.30 0.07 0.13 0.23 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.15 0.33 0.33 0.12 0.30 0.51 0.21 0.21 0.36 0.14 0.14 0.26 Volume/Cap: 0.75 0.92 0.16 0.92 0.75 0.68 0.66 0.50 0.85 0.52 0.92 0.89 Delay/Veh: 38.8 36.9 19.0 76.0 28.1 16.9 31.2 29.0 35.6 33.8 68.6 48.4 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 38.8 36.9 19.0 76.0 28.1 16.9 31.2 29.0 35.6 33.8 68.6 48.4 LOS by Move: D D B E C B C C D C E D HCM2kAvgQ: 7 18 2 8 11 11 7 5 14 4 10 12 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER MITIG8 - 2025 No Project w/Wed May 14, 2008 11:19:24 Page 1-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #23 SR 267/Airport Road/Schaffer Mill Road ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 70 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.840 Loss Time (sec): 16 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 27.4 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Street Name: SR 267 Airport Road/Schaffer Mill Road Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 28 1009 48 107 967 231 337 28 52 60 22 116 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 28 1009 48 107 967 231 337 28 52 60 22 116 Added Vol: 0 6 0 1 7 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 28 1015 48 108 974 232 338 28 52 60 22 117 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 29 1068 51 114 1025 244 356 29 55 63 23 123 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 29 1068 51 114 1025 244 356 29 55 63 23 123 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 29 1068 51 114 1025 244 356 29 55 63 23 123 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.96 0.96 0.85 0.97 0.97 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 1.91 0.09 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.92 0.08 1.00 0.73 0.27 1.00 Final Sat.: 1805 3603 170 1805 3800 1615 1677 139 1615 1342 492 1615 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.30 0.30 0.06 0.27 0.15 0.21 0.21 0.03 0.05 0.05 0.08 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.02 0.35 0.35 0.07 0.40 0.40 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.09 0.09 0.09 Volume/Cap: 0.67 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.67 0.37 0.84 0.84 0.13 0.52 0.52 0.84 Delay/Veh: 66.8 25.8 25.8 66.9 18.2 15.0 37.8 37.8 20.4 33.2 33.2 64.2 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 66.8 25.8 25.8 66.9 18.2 15.0 37.8 37.8 20.4 33.2 33.2 64.2 LOS by Move: E C C E B B D D C C C E HCM2kAvgQ: 2 14 14 5 10 4 11 11 1 3 3 5 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** MITIG8 - 2025 No Project w/Wed Sep 24, 2008 16:51:12 Page 1-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #28 89 south / DPR ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 85 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED ******************************************************************************** Critical Vol./Cap.(X): Average Delay (sec/veh): Level Of Service: 0.957 46.2 D Approach: Movement: Control: Rights: Min. Green: Lanes: North Bound South Bound East Bound L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II Protected Include 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 II Volume Module: Base Vol: 469 116 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 469 116 Added Vol: 1 PasserByVol: 0 Initial Fut: 470 User Adj: 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 PHF Volume: 495 Reduct Vol: 0 Reduced Vol: 495 PCE Adj: 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 FinalVolume: 495 0 0 116 1.00 0.95 122 0 122 1.00 1.00 122 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: Adjustment: Lanes: Final Sat.: 1900 1900 0.95 0.90 1.00 0.35 1805 595 Protected Include 0 0 1 Protected Ovl 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 II West Bound L - T - R II Protected Include 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 II 218 96 167 79 96 265 464 503 397 60 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 218 96 167 79 96 265 464 503 397 60 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 218 96 167 79 96 269 465 504 402 60 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 229 101 176 83 101 283 489 531 423 63 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 229 101 176 83 101 283 489 531 423 63 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 229 101 176 83 101 283 489 531 423 63 II II II 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.65 0.56 0.98 0.46 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1119 964 1677 793 1805 1900 1615 1805 1900 II II II Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.29 0.26 Volume/Cap: 0.96 0.78 Delay/Veh: 58.7 37.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 58.7 37.8 LOS by Move: E D HCM2kAvgQ: 18 11 ******************************************************************************** 1900 0.85 1.00 1615 0.27 0.21 0.21 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.06 0.15 0.30 0.29 0.22 0.04 **** **** **** **** 0.26 0.13 0.11 0.11 0.09 0.16 0.44 0.31 0.37 0.37 0.78 0.78 0.96 0.96 0.60 0.96 0.69 0.96 0.60 0.11 37.8 44.1 72.8 72.8 43.1 76.2 21.8 56.6 23.2 17.6 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 37.8 44.1 72.8 72.8 43.1 76.2 21.8 56.6 23.2 17.6 D D E E D E C E C B 11 7 9 9 4 12 11 19 10 1 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER SIDRA INTERSECTION Win on VW Movement Summary SR 89 S / DPR/ Frates 2025 Summer PM Pk No Project Roundabout Vehicle Movements 95% Dem Deg of Aver Level Back ID Turn Flow %HV Satn Delay of of (veh/h) (v/c) (sec) Service Queue (ft) Prop. Eff. Stop Queued Rate Aver Speed (mph) SR 89 S 3L L 495 2.0 0.529 11.5 LOS B 118 0.69 0.86 21.6 8T T 122 1.6 0.416 3.6 LOS A 75 0.63 0.50 22.7 8R R 229 2.2 0.416 6.5 LOS A 75 0.63 0.70 23.2 Approach 847 2.0 0.530 9.0 LOS A 118 0.66 0.76 22.2 DPR WB 0 L 531 2.1 0.622 15.0 LOS B 144 0.76 1.00 26.8 6T T 423 1.9 0.604 10.0 LOS A 133 0.76 0.93 30.2 6R R 63 1.6 0.606 10.9 LOS B 133 0.76 0.95 29.3 Approach 1017 2.0 0.622 12.7 LOS B 144 0.76 0.97 28.3 Frates 7L L 101 2.0 0.357 16.5 LOS B 60 0.81 0.98 20.7 4T T 176 2.3 0.357 8.6 LOS A 64 0.82 0.89 21.7 4R R 83 2.4 0.358 10.5 LOS B 64 0.82 0.93 22.0 Approach 360 2.2 0.357 11.3 LOS B 64 0.82 0.93 21.4 DPR EB 5L L 101 2.0 0.549 15.5 LOS B 119 0.78 1.00 26.2 2T T 283 2.1 0.550 11.7 LOS B 119 0.78 0.95 29.8 2R R 489 2.0 0.632 12.5 LOS B 160 0.83 1.01 28.1 Approach 874 2.1 0.632 12.6 LOS B 160 0.81 0.99 28.4 All Vehicles 3098 2.0 0.632 11.5 LOS B 160 0.75 0.91 25.4 2 lane, 75' island, 30' circ MITIG8 - 2025 Winter No ProThu Jun 5, 2008 10:29:40 Page 1-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #23 SR 267/Airport Road/Schaffer Mill Road ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 105 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.948 Loss Time (sec): 16 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 46.7 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Street Name: SR 267 Airport Road/Schaffer Mill Road Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 47 1110 67 213 1067 258 402 41 104 71 72 334 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 47 1110 67 213 1067 258 402 41 104 71 72 334 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 49 1168 71 224 1123 272 423 43 109 75 76 352 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 49 1168 71 224 1123 272 423 43 109 75 76 352 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 49 1168 71 224 1123 272 423 43 109 75 76 352 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.96 0.96 0.85 0.98 0.98 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 1.89 0.11 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.91 0.09 1.00 0.50 0.50 1.00 Final Sat.: 1805 3551 214 1805 3800 1615 1650 168 1615 921 934 1615 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.33 0.33 0.12 0.30 0.17 0.26 0.26 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.22 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.04 0.35 0.35 0.13 0.44 0.44 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.10 0.10 0.23 Volume/Cap: 0.68 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.68 0.38 0.95 0.95 0.25 0.82 0.82 0.95 Delay/Veh: 71.9 47.6 47.6 89.2 24.7 20.3 65.4 65.4 30.3 71.4 71.4 73.1 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 71.9 47.6 47.6 89.2 24.7 20.3 65.4 65.4 30.3 71.4 71.4 73.1 LOS by Move: E D D F C C E E C E E E HCM2kAvgQ: 3 24 24 11 15 6 20 20 3 7 7 16 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER 2025 Plus Project 2025 plus project with DT DWed May 28, 2008 16:40:50 Page 6-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 SR 89 South/West River Street ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): Optimal Cycle: 60 Level Of Service: ******************************************************************************** 0.665 16.6 B Street Name: SR 89 West River Street Approach: Movement: Control: Rights: Min. Green: Lanes: North Bound L - T - R II Protected Include 0 0 0 0 2 0 South Bound East Bound L - T- R L- T - II Protected Include 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 807 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 807 Added Vol: 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 807 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 849 Reduct Vol: 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 849 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 849 II Protected Include 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 II R II West Bound L - T - R 0 0 1 Protected Ovl 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 141 220 686 0 0 0 0 237 0 96 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 141 220 686 0 0 0 0 237 0 96 21 29 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 162 249 686 0 0 0 0 260 0 128 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 171 262 722 0 0 0 0 274 0 135 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 171 262 722 0 0 0 0 274 0 135 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 171 262 722 0 0 0 0 274 0 135 II II II Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.95 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 0.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 0 3610 1615 1805 1900 0 0 0 0 1805 0 1615 I II II II Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.24 0.11 0.15 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.08 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.35 0.35 0.22 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.45 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.67 0.30 0.67 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.67 0.00 0.19 Delay/Veh: 0.0 17.7 14.3 25.7 10.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.2 0.0 10.2 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 17.7 14.3 25.7 10.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.2 0.0 10.2 LOS by Move: A B B C B A A A A C A B HCM2kAvgQ: 0 8 2 6 10 0 0 0 0 6 0 2 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER 2025 plus project with DT DWed May 28, 2008 16:40:50 Page 7-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #2 West River/McIver Crossing ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 63.9 Worst Case Level Of Service: F[262.3] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: McIver Crossing West River Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Stop Sign Rights: Include Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 I II Volume Module: Base Vol: 3 Growth Adj: 1.00 Initial Bse: 3 Added Vol: 0 PasserByVol: 0 Initial Fut: 3 User Adj: 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 PHF Volume: 3 Reduct Vol: 0 Stop Sign Include 0 1 0 0 1 II 9 9 196 9 101 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 9 196 9 101 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 9 9 196 9 112 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 9 9 206 9 118 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 3 9 9 II Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 II Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 1306 Potent Cap.: 138 Move Cap.: 93 Volume/Cap: 0.03 206 9 118 II 1283 167 134 0.07 404 1211 1203 651 161 186 651 127 149 0.01 1.62 0.06 II Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: Movement: LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx 185 xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx 0.4 xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx 27.1 Shared LOS: * D ApproachDel: 27.1 ApproachLOS: D ******************************************************************************** * * XXXXX * Uncontrolled Include 1 0 0 1 0 Uncontrolled Include 1 0 1 0 1 II 197 336 4 8 268 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 197 336 4 8 268 13 46 0 0 53 0 0 0 0 0 210 382 4 8 321 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 221 402 4 8 338 0 0 0 0 0 221 402 4 8 338 II 78 1.00 78 0 0 78 1.00 0.95 82 0 82 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx II II I 338 420 709 1150 709 1150 0.17 0.19 II XXXX xxxx 0.6 XXXXX xxxx 11.1 * * B LT - LTR - RT 128 xxxx xxxxx 16.0 xxxx xxxxx 399.5 xxxx xxxxx F * 262.3 F XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX 0.7 xxxx 8.9 xxxx A 406 1163 1163 XXXX 0.01 II XXXXX XXXXX * LT - LTR - RT XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXX 0.0 xxxx xxxxx 8.1 xxxx xxxxx A LT - LTR - RT XXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXXX * * * * * * XXXXXX * XXXXXX * Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Initial Bse: 73 510 0 0 404 234 147 0 136 0 0 0 Added Vol: 11 45 0 0 43 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 84 555 0 0 447 234 147 0 149 0 0 0 Movement Summary DPR/McIver 2025 Summer PM Plus Project Roundabout Vehicle Movements 95% Dem Deg of Aver Level Back ID Turn Flow %HV Satn Delay of of (veh/h) (v/c) (sec) Service Queue (ft) Prop. Eff. Stop Queued Rate Aver Speed (mph) DPR 3L L 91 2.2 0.587 9.9 LOS A 169 0.59 0.64 26.1 8T T 603 2.0 0.588 6.5 LOS A 169 0.59 0.56 29.2 Approach 694 2.0 0.588 7.0 LOS A 169 0.59 0.57 28.7 DPR 4T T 486 2.1 0.539 5.5 LOS A 98 0.26 0.47 32.6 4R R 257 1.9 0.539 6.3 LOS A 98 0.26 0.52 32.0 Approach 743 2.0 0.539 5.8 LOS A 98 0.26 0.49 32.4 Mc Iver 5L L 162 1.9 0.367 12.0 LOS B 68 0.63 0.79 22.0 2R R 162 1.9 0.367 6.4 LOS A 68 0.63 0.69 22.8 Approach 323 1.9 0.366 9.2 LOS A 68 0.63 0.74 22.4 All Vehicles 1760 2.0 0.588 6.9 LOS A 169 0.46 0.57 28.5 2025 plus project with DT DWed May 28, 2008 16:40:50 Page 9-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #4 DPR/I80 Central WB off Ramp ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 4.2 Worst Case Level Of Service: C[ 17.4] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Channel Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 423 0 0 487 0 0 0 0 56 0 245 Growth Adj: 1 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 423 0 0 487 0 0 0 0 56 0 245 Added Vol: 0 34 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 1 0 11 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 457 0 0 519 0 0 0 0 57 0 256 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 481 0 0 546 0 0 0 0 60 0 269 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 481 0 0 546 0 0 0 0 60 0 269 I II II II I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 I II II II I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1027 xxxx 481 Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 262 xxxx 589 Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 262 xxxx 589 Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.23 xxxx 0.46 I II II II Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.9 xxxx 2.4 Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 22.8 xxxx 16.2 LOS by Move: * * * * * * * C * C Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx 17.4 ApproachLOS: * * * C ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER 2025 plus project with DT DWed May 28, 2008 16:40:50 Page 10-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #5 I-80 BB / DPR Central / High St ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 2.5 Worst Case Level Of Service: C[ 22.4] ******************************************************************************** Approach: Movement: Control: Rights: Lanes: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Uncontrolled Include 0 0 1 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 Added Vol: 0 PasserByVol: 0 Initial Fut: 0 User Adj: 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 Reduct Vol: 0 FinalVolume: 0 II II Uncontrolled Include 0 1 0 0 0 II II I I Stop Sign Include 0 0 1! 0 0 II Stop Sign Include 0 0 0 0 1 503 0 43 574 0 20 0 100 0 0 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 503 0 43 574 0 20 0 100 0 0 3 45 0 0 33 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 548 0 43 607 0 20 0 110 0 0 3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 577 0 45 639 0 21 0 116 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 577 0 45 639 0 21 0 116 0 0 3 II II II Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx Move Cap.: xxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: Movement: LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: ApproachDel: ApproachLOS: ******************************************************************************** xxxx XXXX XXXX xxxx XXXXX XXXXX II xxxxx XXXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXXXX * II 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 7.1 6.5 6.2 xxxxx xxxx 6.2 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 xxxxx xxxx 3.3 II II 577 xxxx xxxxx 1308 1306 639 xxxx xxxx 1007 xxxx xxxxx 138 161 480 xxxx xxxx 1007 xxxx xxxxx 132 154 480 xxxx xxxx 0.04 xxxx xxxx 0.16 0.00 0.24 xxxx xxxx II II 0.1 xxxx 8.7 xxxx A LT - LTR XXXX xxxx 0.1 xxxx 8.7 xxxx A XXXXXX * XXXXX xxxx xxxx XXXXX xxxxx xxxx * * * - RT LT - LTR xxxxx xxxx 341 XXXXX xxxxx 1.9 XXXXX xxxxx 22.4 * * C 22.4 C XXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXX * * XXXX XXXX * - RT LT - LTR XXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX * * XXXX XXXX XXXX * 12.0 B 577 520 520 0.01 0.0 12.0 B - RT XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER 2025 plus project with DT DWed May 28, 2008 16:40:50 Page 11-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #6 DPR/Spring ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 7.3 Worst Case Level Of Service: E[ 49.0] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 I II II II Volume Module: Base Vol: 3 2 0 27 0 414 219 443 0 0 15 56 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 3 2 0 27 0 414 219 443 0 0 15 56 Added Vol: 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 58 0 0 58 1 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 3 2 0 28 0 414 219 501 0 0 73 57 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 3 2 0 29 0 436 231 527 0 0 77 60 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 3 2 0 29 0 436 231 527 0 0 77 60 I II II II Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 7.1 6.5 xxxxx 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx I II II II I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 1313 1125 xxxxx 1066 1065 77 137 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 137 207 xxxxx 202 224 990 1460 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 66 169 xxxxx 172 184 990 1460 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.05 0.01 xxxx 0.17 0.00 0.44 0.16 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx II II II I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.6 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.9 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * A * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: 87 xxxx xxxxx xxxx 761 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue: 0.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 4.2 xxxxx 0.6 xxxx xxxxx 0.0 xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel: 49.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 16.9 xxxxx 7.9 xxxx xxxxx 9.0 xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: E * * * C * A * * A * * ApproachDel: 49.0 16.9 xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: E C * * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER MITIG8 - 2025 plus project Fri May 16, 2008 11:10:08 Page 1-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #8 Bridge and Church ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 13.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: Ft 59.5] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound Movement: L - T - R Control: Rights: Lanes: Uncontrolled Include 0 0 0 1 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 296 17 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 296 17 Added Vol: 0 2 104 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 298 121 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 0 314 127 Reduct Vol: 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 314 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx II II 0 127 II South Bound L - T - R East Bound West Bound L - T - R L - T - R II II Uncontrolled Include 0 1 0 0 0 II 40 1.00 40 25 0 65 1.00 0.95 68 363 1.00 363 5 0 368 1.00 0.95 387 0 0 68 387 Stop Sign Include 0 0 1! 0 0 II 0 19 1.00 1 00 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 19 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0 20 0 0 0 20 II 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx II II 7 13 1.00 1.00 7 13 0 0 0 0 7 13 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 7 14 0 0 7 14 II Stop Sign Include 0 0 1! 0 0 36 1.00 36 130 0 166 1.00 0.95 175 0 175 0 1.00 0 0 0 0 1.00 0.95 0 0 0 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 II xxxxx 441 xxxx xxxxx 931 965 xxxxx 1130 xxxx xxxxx 249 257 1130 xxxx xxxxx 216 241 0.06 xxxx xxxx 0.09 0.03 II II xxxxx XXXX Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: Movement: LT - LTR Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx Shared LOS: ApproachDel: xxxxxx ApproachLOS: ******************************************************************************** * * - RT XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX * 0.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxx 8.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx A LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 286 0.2 xxxx xxxxx 8.4 xxxx A xxxxxx * 387 665 665 0.02 XXXXX * XXXX XXXX * XXXXX 0.5 XXXXX 19.7 * C 19.7 C II 912 902 257 280 234 262 0.75 0.00 26 1.00 26 30 0 56 1.00 0.95 59 0 59 I 6.2 3.3 377 674 674 0.09 XXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXX * * XXXX XXXX * XXXXX XXXXX * - RT LT - LTR - RT xxxxx xxxx 280 xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx 6.9 xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx 59.5 xxxxx * * F 59.5 F Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER 2025 plus project with DT DWed May 28, 2008 16:40:50 Page 14-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #9 Jibboom and Bridge ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): OVERFLOW Worst Case Level Of Service: F[xxxxx] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound Movement: L - T - R Control: Stop Sign Rights: Include Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 I II Volume Module: Base Vol: 10 Growth Adj: 1.00 Initial Bse: 10 Added Vol: 2 PasserByVol: 0 Initial Fut: 12 User Adj: 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 PHF Volume: 13 Reduct Vol: 0 FinalVolume: 13 Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 7.1 6.5 FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 1111 924 Potent Cap.: 188 272 Move Cap.: 0 223 Volume/Cap: xxxx 1.57 Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx South Bound East Bound West Bound L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R II II II Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Include Include Include 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 II II 302 62 27 246 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 302 62 27 246 30 0 0 29 0 0 0 0 332 62 27 275 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 349 65 28 289 0 0 0 0 349 65 28 289 II 116 176 200 141 41 136 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 116 176 200 141 41 136 36 1.00 36 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 116 176 200 143 41 136 36 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 122 185 211 151 43 143 38 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 122 185 211 151 43 143 38 6.2 7.1 6.5 3.3 3.5 4.0 II 286 758 758 0.09 LOS by Move: Movement: Shared Cap.: xxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx Shared LOS: ApproachDel: xxxxxx ApproachLOS: F F ******************************************************************************** * * * LT - LTR - RT II 1112 980 188 252 0 207 XXXX 1.40 II II I 6.2 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 3.3 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx II II I 162 181 888 1406 888 1406 0.14 0.13 XXXX xxxx XXXXX xxxx * * LT - LTR 0 xxxxx xxxx 0 XXXXX XXXXX * XXXXX XXXXX * - RT XXXXX II XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXX 0.5 xxxx xxxxx 7.9 xxxx xxxxx A LT - LTR - RT XXXX xxxx xxxxx 361 1209 1209 0.04 XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXX II I 0.1 xxxx xxxxx 8.1 xxxx xxxxx A LT - LTR - RT XXXX xxxx xxxxx XXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXXX XXXXX * * * * * * * XXXXXX XXXXXX * XXXX XXXXX XXXX XXXXX * * XXXXXX * Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER 2025 plus project with DT DWed May 28, 2008 16:40:50 Page 15-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #10 DPR/ Church ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 12.7 Worst Case Level Of Service: C[ 17.9] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Approach: Movement: Control: Rights: Lanes: DPR North Bound L - T - R Uncontrolled Include 0 1 0 0 0 Volume Module: Base Vol: 34 66 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 34 66 Added Vol: 0 7 PasserByVol: 0 0 Initial Fut: 34 73 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 36 77 Reduct Vol: 0 0 FinalVolume: 36 77 II Uncontrolled Include 0 0 1! 0 0 II II Church South Bound East Bound West Bound L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R II II 0 7 42 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 7 42 0 74 20 0 0 0 0 81 62 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0 85 65 0 0 0 0 85 65 II Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx II Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 82 xxxx Potent Cap.: 1528 xxxx Move Cap.: 1528 xxxx Volume/Cap: 0.02 xxxx XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXX Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: Control Del: LOS by Move: Movement: Shared Cap.: SharedQueue: Shrd ConDel: Shared LOS: ApproachDel: ApproachLOS: ******************************************************************************** A LT - LTR XXXX xxxx II Stop Sign Include 0 0 1! 0 0 II 16 24 5 8 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 16 24 5 8 0 0 129 0 0 0 0 0 16 1.00 0.95 17 4.1 xxxx 2.2 xxxx 77 1535 1535 0.06 XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 24 1.00 0.95 25 134 1.00 0.95 141 8 1.00 0.95 8 0 0 0 0 Stop Sign Include 0 0 1! 0 0 13 1.00 13 5 7 1.00 7 160 45 1.00 45 95 0 0 0 18 167 140 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 19 176 147 0 0 0 17 25 141 8 19 176 147 II II XXXXX XXXXX II 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 II XXXXX 554 393 XXXXX 446 547 XXXXX 259 502 xxxx 0.10 0.28 II 74 467 401 77 994 509 541 990 994 372 497 990 0.01 0.05 0.35 0.15 II 0.1 xxxx xxxxx 0.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 7.4 xxxx xxxxx 7.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx * A * * * * * * * * - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 452 xxxxx xxxx 618 xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 1.8 xxxxx xxxxx 3.4 xxxxx 7.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 17.9 xxxxx xxxxx 17.8 xxxxx A xxxxxx * * * * * * C * * C XXXXXX * 17.9 17.8 C C Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER 2025 plus project with DT DWed May 28, 2008 16:40:50 Page 16-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #11 DPR / Keiser ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 5.0 Worst Case Level Of Service: C[ 16.3] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 2 126 0 0 62 130 221 0 2 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 2 126 0 0 62 130 221 0 2 0 0 0 Added Vol: 1 101 0 0 93 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 3 227 0 0 155 130 221 0 3 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 3 239 0 0 163 137 233 0 3 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 3 239 0 0 163 137 233 0 3 0 0 0 I II 11 II I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 6.5 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx I II II II I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 300 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 477 477 232 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 1273 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 551 490 813 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 1273 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 550 489 813 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.42 0.00 0.00 xxxx xxxx xxxx Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 7.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: A * * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx 552 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue: 0.0 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 2.1 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel: 7.8 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx 16.3 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: A * * * * * * C * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 16.3 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * C * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER 2025 plus project with DT DWed May 28, 2008 16:40:50 Page 17-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #12 DPR/Glenshire Drive ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 13.4 Worst Case Level Of Service: E[ 37.5] ******************************************************************************** Approach: Movement: North Bound L - T - R II Control: Stop Sign Rights: Include Lanes: 1 0 0 0 1 I II Volume Module: Base Vol: 79 0 291 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 79 0 291 Added Vol: 2 0 35 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 81 0 326 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 90 0 361 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 90 0 361 II Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 5.6 xxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 xxxx South Bound East Bound West Bound L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R II II Stop Sign Include 0 0 0 0 0 II Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 1877 xxxx Potent Cap.: 121 xxxx Move Cap.: 64 Total Cap: 115 Volume/Cap: 0.78 Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 4.5 xxxx 4.3 Control De1:103.7 xxxx 21.0 LOS by Move: F * C Movement: LT - LTR - RT xxxx 75 xxxxx xxxx 0.62 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.90 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 II Uncontrolled Include 0 0 0 1 0 0 254 188 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 254 188 0 97 4 0 0 0 0 351 192 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.90 0 389 213 0 0 0 0 389 213 II Uncontrolled Include 1 0 1 0 0 491 1.00 491 31 0 522 1.00 0.90 578 0 578 II 112 0 1.00 1.00 112 0 91 0 0 0 203 0 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 225 0 0 0 225 0 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx II II II I 495 578 578 Shared Cap.: xxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx Shared LOS: ApproachDel: ApproachLOS: ******************************************************************************** * II II xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx * * * * * LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR xxxx xxxx xxxx * * * xxxxxx * xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx * * * xxxxxx * 602 986 986 xxxx 0.59 * * * xxxxxx * * Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER 2025 plus project with DT DWed May 28, 2008 16:40:51 Page 18-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #13 I-80 EB/DPR Eastern ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 277.3 Worst Case Level Of Service: F[803.9] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: DPR I-80 EB Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R II II II I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 640 0 0 479 0 458 0 196 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 640 0 0 479 0 458 0 196 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 126 0 0 75 0 0 0 41 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 766 0 0 554 0 458 0 237 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 0 849 0 0 614 0 507 0 263 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 0 849 0 0 614 0 507 0 263 0 0 0 I II II II Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 6.4 xxxx 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 3.5 xxxx 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx I II II II I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 1463 xxxx 614 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 143 xxxx 496 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 143 xxxx 496 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 3.55 xxxx 0.53 xxxx xxxx xxxx I II II II I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 49.4 xxxx 3.1 xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 1210 xxxx 20.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * F * C * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 803.9 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * F * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER 2025 plus project with DT DWed May 28, 2008 16:40:51 Page 19-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #14 I-80 WB/DPR Eastern ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 1.1 Worst Case Level Of Service: B[ 11.1] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: DPR I-80 WB Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 144 886 0 0 472 219 0 0 0 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 144 886 0 0 472 219 0 0 0 0 0 0 Added Vol: 46 80 0 0 75 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 190 966 0 0 547 219 0 0 0 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 211 1070 0 0 606 243 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 211 1070 0 0 606 243 0 0 0 0 0 0 I II II II I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx I II II II I Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 849 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 798 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 798 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.26 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx II II II I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 1.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 11.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: B * * * * * * * * * * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * * * * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER 2025 plus project with DT DWed May 28, 2008 16:40:51 Page 20-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #15 DPR/Pioneer Trail ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 1345.6 Worst Case Level Of Service: F[4703.4] ******************************************************************************** Approach: Movement: Control: Rights: Lanes: North Bound L - T - R Uncontrolled Include 1 0 0 1 0 South Bound East Bound West Bound L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R II II II II Volume Module: Base Vol: 190 674 19 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 190 674 19 Added Vol: 11 68 1 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 201 742 20 17 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 212 781 21 18 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 212 781 21 II Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx II Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 1046 xxxx xxxxx 802 Potent Cap.: 673 xxxx xxxxx 830 Move Cap.: 673 xxxx xxxxx 830 Volume/Cap: 0.31 xxxx xxxx 0.02 II Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 1.3 xxxx xxxxx Control Del: 12.8 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: B Movement: LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx Shared LOS: ApproachDel: ApproachLOS: ******************************************************************************** Uncontrolled Include 0 1 0 0 1 17 431 497 1.00 1.00 1.00 17 431 497 0 65 1 0 0 0 496 1.00 0.95 522 498 1.00 0.95 524 0 0 0 18 522 524 4.1 xxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxx xxxxx XXXX XXXXX * * XXXXXX * A LT - LTR - RT xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx 9.4 xxxx xxxxx A XXXX xxxx xxxx XXXX II II Stop Sign Include 0 1 0 1 0 it 564 4 1.00 1.00 564 4 0 0 0 0 564 4 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 594 4 0 0 594 4 Stop Sign Include 0 0 1! 0 0 220 18 1.00 1.00 220 18 9 1 0 0 229 1.00 0.95 241 xxxxx 7.1 6.5 XXXXX 3.5 4.0 II XXXXX XXXXX xxxxx XXXX 19 1.00 0.95 20 0 0 241 20 II 5 1.00 5 17 1.00 17 0 0 0 0 5 1.00 0.95 5 17 1.00 0.95 18 0 0 5 18 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 II 1784 1783 522 2157 2297 792 64 83 559 35 39 392 39 55 559 14 26 392 15.21 0.08 0.43 1.43 0.20 0.05 II II 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 9.4 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx * * * * * * LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT 39 xxxx 483 xxxx 26 xxxxx 72.9 xxxx 2.8 xxxxx 5.3 xxxxx 6625 xxxx 19.9 xxxxx 656 xxxxx F * C * F * xxxxxx 4703.4 655.9 * F F Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER Intersection #16 DPR/SR 89 North Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Initial Bse: 652 270 165 48 400 224 519 167 574 276 81 33 Added Vol: 32 0 0 0 0 24 26 10 32 0 9 0 Initial Fut: 684 270 165 48 400 248 545 177 606 276 90 33 SIDRA NI an INTERSECTION Movement Summary 89North / DPR 2025 Summer PM Plus Pro 2 Lane Roundabout Vehicle Movements 95% Dem Deg of Aver Level Back Ip Turn Flow %HV Satn Delay of of (veh/h) (v/c) (sec) Service Queue (ft) Prop. Eff. Stop Queued Rate Aver Speed (mph) 89 North NB 3L L 743 2.0 0.837 19.5 LOS B 274 0.92 1.14 27.1 8T T 293 2.0 0.641 10.1 LOS B 138 0.79 0.90 32.3 8R R 179 2.2 0.641 11.6 LOS B 138 0.79 0.97 31.8 Approach 1218 2.1 0.837 16.1 LOS B 274 0.87 1.05 28.7 Gray's Xing 0 L 300 2.0 0.699 31.4 LOS C 210 1.00 1.35 16.3 6T T 98 2.0 0.424 15.7 LOS B 83 0.91 1.01 18.9 6R R 36 2.8 0.424 17.9 LOS B 83 0.91 1.03 18.7 Approach 434 2.1 0.699 26.7 LOS C 210 0.97 1.25 16.9 89 North SB 7L L 52 1.9 0.667 24.0 LOS C 181 0.95 1.12 24.1 4T T 435 2.1 0.667 18.1 LOS B 198 0.95 1.11 27.3 4R R 270 1.9 0.667 18.8 LOS B 198 0.97 1.13 26.8 Approach 756 2.0 0.667 18.8 LOS B 198 0.96 1.12 26.9 DPR 5L L 592 2.0 0.747 13.9 LOS B 201 0.84 1.12 20.5 2T T 192 2.1 0.915 12.4 LOS B 417 0.99 1.47 19.9 2R R 659 2.0 0.917 14.6 LOS B 417 0.99 1.48 19.6 Approach 1445 2.0 0.916 14.0 LOS B 417 0.93 1.33 20.0 All Vehicles 3853 2.0 0.917 17.0 LOS B 417 0.92 1.19 23.0 2 lane, 108' island, 36' circ 2025 plus project with DT DWed May 28, 2008 16:40:51 Page 22-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #17 SR 267 Bypass -SR 89 N/I-80 EB ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.775 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 257.4 Optimal Cycle: 120 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: SR 89 North I 80 EB Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Rights: Min. Green: Lanes: I II II Protected Include 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 II Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 Added Vol: 0 PasserByVol: 0 Initial Fut: 0 User Adj: 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 PHF Volume: 0 Reduct Vol: 0 Reduced Vol: 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 Protected Include 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 II II I Split Phase Include 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 II Split Phase Include 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1385 545 438 999 0 57 0 730 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1385 545 438 999 0 57 0 730 0 0 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1385 545 470 999 0 57 0 730 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 1535 604 521 1107 0 63 0 809 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1535 604 521 1107 0 63 0 809 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1535 604 521 1107 0 63 0 809 0 0 II II II Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 0 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1615 1805 1900 0 1809 0 1615 0 0 II II II Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.81 0.37 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.46 0.46 Volume/Cap: 0.00 1.77 0.82 Delay/Veh: 0.0 386 35.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 386 35.8 LOS by Move: A F D HCM2kAvgQ: 0 137 21 ******************************************************************************** **** 1.00 0 0 0 0 1.00 0.90 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 0 1900 1.00 0.00 0 0.29 0.58 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 **** **** 0.16 0.62 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.77 0.94 0.00 0.12 0.00 1.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 412.3 35.7 0.0 32.1 0.0 400.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 412.3 35.7 0.0 32.1 0.0 400.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 F D A C A F A A A 48 42 0 2 0 73 0 0 0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER 2025 plus project with DT DWed May 28, 2008 16:40:51 Page 23-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #18 SR 267 Bypass/I-80 WB ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): Loss Time (sec): Optimal Cycle: 120 Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: SR 89 North I-80 Westbound Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 I II II II Volume Module: Base Vol: 744 699 0 0 1028 229 0 0 0 410 8 389 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 744 699 0 0 1028 229 0 0 0 410 8 389 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 5 32 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 744 699 0 0 1060 229 0 0 0 410 13 421 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 824 775 0 0 1175 254 0 0 0 454 14 466 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 824 775 0 0 1175 254 0 0 0 454 14 466 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 824 775 0 0 1175 254 0 0 0 454 14 466 I II II II Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 0.93 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.97 0.03 1.00 Final Sat.: 1805 1900 0 0 1900 1615 0 0 0 1707 54 1615 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.46 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.62 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.27 0.29 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.30 0.71 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.19 0.19 Volume/Cap: 1.52 0.57 0.00 0.00 1.52 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.40 1.40 1.52 Delay/Veh: 283.1 9.2 0.0 0.0 274 25.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 244.0 244 296.5 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 283.1 9.2 0.0 0.0 274 25.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 244.0 244 296.5 LOS by Move: F A A A F C A A A F F F HCM2kAvgQ: 65 14 0 0 92 7 0 0 0 35 35 38 ******************************************************************************** 1.515 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 207.3 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER 2025 plus project with DT DWed May 28, 2008 16:40:51 Page 24-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #19 Bridge Street/ West River St ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): OVERFLOW Worst Case Level Of Service: F[xxxxx] ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Bridge Street West River St Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II Control: Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 322 593 18 29 538 75 167 21 379 27 9 48 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 322 593 18 29 538 75 167 21 379 27 9 48 Added Vol: 0 114 0 1 122 54 47 0 0 0 0 1 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 322 707 18 30 660 129 214 21 379 27 9 49 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 357 783 20 33 731 143 237 23 420 30 10 54 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 357 783 20 33 731 143 237 23 420 30 10 54 I II II II Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 FollowUpTim: 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx 3.5 4.0 3.3 3.5 4.0 3.3 I II II II Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 874 xxxx xxxxx 803 xxxx xxxxx 2408 2386 803 2598 2448 793 Potent Cap.: 780 xxxx xxxxx 829 xxxx xxxxx 23 35 387 17 32 392 Move Cap.: 780 xxxx xxxxx 829 xxxx xxxxx 7 18 387 0 16 392 Volume/Cap: 0.46 xxxx xxxx 0.04 xxxx xxxx 35.01 1.29 1.09 xxxx 0.61 0.14 I II II II Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: 2.4 xxxx xxxxx 0.1 xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx 14.8 xxxx xxxx 0.5 Control Del: 13.4 xxxx xxxxx 9.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx 103.8 xxxxx xxxx 15.7 LOS by Move: B * * A * * * * F * * C Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 7 xxxx xxxxx 0 xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 34.5 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 16894 xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * * * * * * F * * * * ApproachDel: xxxxxx xxxxxx 6530.0 xxxxxx ApproachLOS: * F F ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER MITIG8 - 2025 plus project Tue Apr 29, 2008 17:37:23 Page 1-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #20 Brockway Road/Palisades Drive ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 65 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.827 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 19.4 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Brockway Road Palisades Drive Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Split Phase Split Phase Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 197 0 154 0 0 0 0 643 329 176 628 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 197 0 154 0 0 0 0 643 329 176 628 0 Added Vol: 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 112 9 0 105 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 205 0 154 0 0 0 0 755 338 176 733 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 227 0 171 0 0 0 0 837 375 195 812 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 227 0 171 0 0 0 0 837 375 195 812 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 227 0 171 0 0 0 0 837 375 195 812 0 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1805 0 1615 0 0 0 0 1900 1615 1805 1900 0 I II II II Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.23 0.11 0.43 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.15 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.53 0.13 0.66 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.83 0.00 0.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.83 0.44 0.83 0.64 0.00 Delay/Veh: 45.0 0.0 34.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.4 9.6 48.3 7.6 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 45.0 0.0 34.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.4 9.6 48.3 7.6 0.0 LOS by Move: D A C A A A A B A D A A HCM2kAvgQ: 7 0 5 0 0 0 0 17 5 6 10 0 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER Intersection #21 Brockway Road/Martis Valley Road ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Initial Bse: 67 11 131 99 10 68 63 516 75 296 594 103 Added Vol: 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 88 14 0 82 0 Initial Fut: 80 11 131 99 10 68 63 604 89 296 676 103 SIDRA "w" INTERSECTION Movement Summary Brockway Road/Martis Valley Road 2025 Summer PM + Project Roundabout Vehicle Movements 95% Dem Deg of Aver Level Back Mov ID Turn Flow %HV Satn Delay of of (veh/h) (v/c) (sec) Service Queue (ft) Prop. Eff. Stop Queued Rate Aver Speed (mph) Martis Valley NB 3L L 84 2.4 0.419 18.4 LOS B 98 0.90 0.97 25.6 8T T 12 8.3 0.414 8.6 LOS A 98 0.90 0.94 27.7 8R R 138 2.2 0.418 11.8 LOS B 98 0.90 0.85 27.4 Approach 235 2.6 0.418 14.0 LOS B 98 0.90 0.90 26.7 Brockway WB 0 L 312 1.9 0.891 16.8 LOS B 513 0.96 0.72 28.4 6T T 712 2.0 0.891 11.2 LOS B 513 0.96 0.71 32.0 6R R 108 1.9 0.893 11.6 LOS B 513 0.96 0.69 31.0 Approach 1130 1.9 0.891 12.8 LOS B 513 0.96 0.71 30.9 Martis Valley SB 7L L 104 1.9 0.539 25.5 LOS C 146 1.00 1.14 18.4 4T T 11 9.1 0.550 17.7 LOS B 146 1.00 1.14 19.2 4R R 72 1.4 0.538 19.8 LOS B 146 1.00 1.02 19.7 Approach 186 2.2 0.539 22.9 LOS C 146 1.00 1.09 18.9 Brockway EB 5L L 66 1.5 0.857 22.1 LOS C 430 1.00 1.11 24.9 2T T 636 2.0 0.861 16.8 LOS B 430 1.00 1.11 28.6 2R R 94 2.1 0.862 17.7 LOS B 430 1.00 1.05 27.5 Approach 796 2.0 0.861 17.4 LOS B 430 1.00 1.10 28.2 All Vehicles 2347 2.0 0.893 15.3 LOS B 513 0.97 0.89 28.1 2025 plus project with DT DWed May 28, 2008 16:40:51 Page 27-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #22 SR 267/Brockway Road/Joerger Drive ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): Loss Time (sec): Optimal Cycle: ******************************************************************************** 120 12 (Y+R=4.0 120 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): Level Of Service: 1.665 296.7 F Approach: Movement: Control: Rights: Min. Green: Lanes: North Bound L - T - R II Protected Include 0 0 1 0 0 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 369 1106 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 369 1106 Added Vol: 57 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 Initial Fut: User Adj: PHF Adj: PHF Volume: Reduct Vol: 0 Reduced Vol: 472 PCE Adj: 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 FinalVolume: 472 South Bound L - T - R Protected Include 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 II East Bound L - T - R II Split Phase Include 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 II 0 1 II West Bound L - T - R Split Phase Include 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 84 184 1000 545 472 186 275 128 233 352 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 84 184 1000 545 472 186 275 128 233 352 0 0 0 0 0 26 61 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 426 1106 84 184 1000 545 472 212 336 128 258 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 472 1225 93 204 1108 604 523 235 372 142 286 352 1.00 0.90 390 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1225 93 204 1108 604 523 235 372 142 286 390 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1225 93 204 1108 604 523 235 372 142 286 390 II II II Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: Adjustment: Lanes: Final Sat.: 1900 0.95 1.00 1805 Capacity Analysis Vol/Sat: 0.26 Crit Moves: **** Green/Cycle: 0.16 Volume/Cap: 1.67 Delay/Veh: 365.1 User DelAdj: 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 365.1 LOS by Move: F HCM2kAvgQ: ******************************************************************************** 1900 1900 1900 0.99 0.99 0.95 0.93 0.07 1.00 1746 133 1805 II Module: 0.70 0.70 0.11 0.58 0.37 0.41 0.41 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.24 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1.00 0.85 0.97 0.97 0.85 0.98 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.69 0.31 1.00 0.33 0.67 1900 1615 1268 569 1615 620 1250 II II 1900 0.85 1.00 1615 0.44 0.44 1.61 1.61 312 312.2 1.00 1.00 312 312.2 F F 42 109 109 **** **** 0.07 0.35 1.61 1.67 362.0 345 1.00 1.00 362.0 345 F F 19 95 **** 0.35 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.15 0.15 0.15 1.07 1.67 1.67 0.93 1.58 1.58 1.67 96.2 354.1 354 72.3 328.1 328 368.8 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 96.2 354.1 354 72.3 328.1 328 368.8 F F F E F F F 32 65 65 17 36 36 35 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER 2025 plus project with DT DWed May 28, 2008 16:40:51 Page 28-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #23 SR 267/Airport Road/Schaffer Mill Road ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): Loss Time (sec): Optimal Cycle: ******************************************************************************** 120 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.182 16 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 98.1 120 Level Of Service: F Street Name: SR 267 Airport Road/Schaffer Mill Road Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R Control: Rights: Min. Green: Lanes: I II II Protected Include 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 II Volume Module: Base Vol: 28 Growth Adj: 1.00 28 Initial Bse: Added Vol: 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 Initial Fut: 28 1049 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 31 1162 Reduct Vol: 0 0 Reduced Vol: 31 1162 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 31 1162 1009 1.00 1009 40 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: Adjustment: Lanes: Final Sat.: 1900 1900 0.95 0.99 1.00 0.96 1805 1804 Protected II I Split Phase Split Phase Include Include Include 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 II II 0 1 48 107 967 231 337 28 52 60 22 116 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 48 107 967 231 337 28 52 60 22 116 0 7 43 6 6 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 114 1010 237 343 28 52 60 22 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 53 126 1119 263 380 31 58 66 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 126 1119 263 380 31 58 66 24 135 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 53 126 1119 263 380 31 58 66 24 135 II II II 122 1.00 0.90 135 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.96 0.96 0.85 0.97 0.97 0.85 0.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.08 1.00 0.73 0.27 1.00 83 1805 1900 1615 1679 137 1615 1342 492 1615 II II II Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.64 0.64 0.07 0.59 0.16 0.23 0.23 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.08 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.02 0.55 0.55 0.06 0.59 0.59 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.07 0.07 0.07 Volume/Cap: 1.00 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.00 0.28 1.18 1.18 0.19 0.70 0.70 1.18 Delay/Veh: 221.7 119 119.2 200.5 52.5 12.4 155.9 156 41.0 70.1 70.1 196.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 221.7 119 119.2 200.5 52.5 12.4 155.9 156 41.0 70.1 70.1 196.9 LOS by Move: F F F F D B F F D E E F HCM2kAvgQ: 3 69 69 10 49 5 26 26 2 5 5 10 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER 2025 plus project with DT DWed May 28, 2008 16:40:51 Page 29-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #24 267 / Northstar Dr ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 65 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.858 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 21.9 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 108 531 0 0 815 265 565 0 130 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 108 531 0 0 815 265 565 0 130 0 0 0 Added Vol: 0 16 0 0 17 21 20 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 108 547 0 0 832 286 585 0 130 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 114 576 0 0 876 301 616 0 137 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 114 576 0 0 876 301 616 0 137 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 114 576 0 0 876 301 616 0 137 0 0 0 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.92 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1805 1900 0 0 1900 1615 3502 0 1615 0 0 0 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.46 0.19 0.18 0.00 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.07 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.54 0.20 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.86 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.86 0.35 0.86 0.00 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 69.1 7.4 0.0 0.0 20.3 8.8 35.1 0.0 23.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 69.1 7.4 0.0 0.0 20.3 8.8 35.1 0.0 23.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: E A A A C A D A C A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 5 7 0 0 18 4 9 0 3 0 0 0 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER MITIG8 - 2025 plus project Tue Apr 29, 2008 17:40:11 Page 1-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #25 SR 28/SR 267 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 90 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.963 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 40.2 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Street Name: SR 267 SR 28 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: •0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 6 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 1 0 3 373 1 298 220 908 1 3 735 481 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 1 0 3 373 1 298 220 908 1 3 735 481 Added Vol: 0 0 0 11 0 6 6 0 0 0 0 10 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 1 0 3 384 1 304 226 908 1 3 735 491 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 1 0 3 425 1 337 250 1006 1 3 814 544 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 1 0 3 425 1 337 250 1006 1 3 814 544 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 1 0 3 425 1 337 250 1006 1 3 814 544 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.71 0.71 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.94 0.94 Lanes: 0.25 0.00 0.75 0.99 0.01 1.00 1.00 1.99 0.01 1.00 1.20 0.80 Final Sat.: 406 0 1217 1347 4 1615 1805 3796 4 1805 2141 1431 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.32 0.21 0.14 0.27 0.27 0.00 0.38 0.38 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.33 0.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.14 0.43 0.43 0.11 0.39 0.39 Volume/Cap: 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.96 0.96 0.64 0.96 0.62 0.62 0.02 0.96 0.96 Delay/Veh: 20.4 0.0 20.4 63.0 63.0 28.3 83.8 20.6 20.6 35.9 42.6 42.6 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 20.4 0.0 20.4 63.0 63.0 28.3 83.8 20.6 20.6 35.9 42.6 42.6 LOS by Move: C A C E E C F C C D D D HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 17 17 9 11 11 11 0 24 24 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER 2025 plus project with DT DWed May 28, 2008 16:40:52 Page 31-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM 4 -Way Stop Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #26 DPR / DPR Extension ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.262 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 9.4 Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: A ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 42 161 96 0 0 44 20 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 0 0 42 161 96 0 0 44 20 Added Vol: 8 3 1 0 16 8 4 82 21 1 100 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 8 3 1 0 16 50 165 178 21 1 144 20 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 8 3 1 0 17 53 174 187 22 1 152 21 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 8 3 1 0 17 53 174 187 22 1 152 21 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 8 3 1 0 17 53 174 187 22 1 152 21 I II II II Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.75 0.25 1.00 0.24 0.76 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.01 0.87 0.12 Final Sat.: 529 440 147 539 155 483 664 732 852 4 614 85 I II II II Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.11 0.11 0.26 0.26 0.03 0.25 0.25 0.25 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Delay/Veh: 9.1 8.4 8.4 0.0 8.5 8.5 9.9 9.2 7.0 9.6 9 6 9.6 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 9.1 8.4 8.4 0.0 8.5 8.5 9.9 9.2 7.0 9.6 9.6 9.6 LOS by Move: A A A * A A A A A A A A ApproachDel: 8.9 8.5 9.4 9.6 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: 8.9 8.5 9.4 9.6 LOS by Appr: A A A A AllWayAvgQ: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.3 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER 2025 plus project with DT DWed May 28, 2008 16:40:52 Page 32-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Unsignalized Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #27 DRP Extension / Glenshire Dr ******************************************************************************** Average Delay (sec/veh): 4.8 Worst Case Level Of Service: E[ 36.8] ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Uncontrolled Uncontrolled Rights: Include Include Include Include Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 I II II II Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 0 96 0 0 0 0 795 0 25 375 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 96 0 0 0 0 795 0 25 375 0 Added Vol: 35 0 39 0 0 0 0 4 32 38 2 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 35 0 135 0 0 0 0 799 32 63 377 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 37 0 142 0 0 0 0 841 34 66 397 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 FinalVolume: 37 0 142 0 0 0 0 841 34 66 397 0 I II II II I Critical Gap Module: Critical Gp: 6.4 6.5 6.2 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 4.1 xxxx xxxxx FollowUpTim: 3.5 4.0 3.3 xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 2.2 xxxx xxxxx I II II II Capacity Module: Cnflict Vol: 1371 1371 841 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 875 xxxx xxxxx Potent Cap.: 163 148 368 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 780 xxxx xxxxx Move Cap.: 152 135 368 xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 780 xxxx xxxxx Volume/Cap: 0.24 0.00 0.39 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx 0.09 xxxx xxxx I II II II I Level Of Service Module: 2Way95thQ: xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx 0.3 xxxx xxxxx Control Del:xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx 10.0 xxxx xxxxx LOS by Move: * * * * * * * * * B * Movement: LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT LT - LTR - RT Shared Cap.: xxxx 285 xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxx xxxxx SharedQueue:xxxxx 3.9 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shrd ConDel:xxxxx 36.8 xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxx xxxxx Shared LOS: * E * * * * * * * * * ApproachDel: 36.8 xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx ApproachLOS: E * * * ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER MITIG8 - 2025 plus project Tue Apr 29, 2008 17:41:50 Page 1-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #28 89 south / DPR ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.271 Loss Time (sec): 16 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 134.0 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Approach: Movement: Control: Rights: Min. Green: Lanes: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II Protected Include 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 II Volume Module: Protected Include 0 Protected Include 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 II Protected Include 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 II Base Vol: 469 116 218 96 167 79 96 236 493 540 397 60 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 469 116 218 96 167 79 96 236 493 540 397 60 Added Vol: 13 1 0 1 1 0 0 18 12 11 18 1 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 482 117 218 97 168 79 96 254 505 551 415 61 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 507 123 229 102 177 83 101 267 532 580 437 64 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 507 123 229 102 177 83 101 267 532 580 437 64 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 507 123 229 102 177 83 101 267 532 580 437 64 I II II II Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: Adjustment: Lanes: Final Sat.: 1900 1900 0.96 0.96 0.80 0.20 1469 357 Capacity Analysis Vol/Sat: Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.27 0.27 Volume/Cap: 1.27 1.27 Delay/Veh: 180.6 181 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 180.6 181 LOS by Move: F F HCM2kAvgQ: 42 42 ******************************************************************************** 0.35 **** 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 0.85 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.56 0.98 0.46 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1615 970 1679 790 1805 1900 1615 1805 1900 II II II 1900 0.85 1.00 1615 Module: 0.35 0.14 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.06 0.14 0.33 0.32 0.23 0.04 **** **** **** 0.27 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.10 0.26 0.26 0.25 0.41 0.41 0.52 1.27 1.27 1.27 0.56 0.54 1.27 1.27 0.56 0.10 38.2 201.4 201 201.4 55.3 39.6 183.8 182.9 27.9 21.7 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 38.2 201.4 201 201.4 55.3 39.6 183.8 182.9 27.9 21.7 D F F F E D F F C C 8 14 14 14 4 9 36 39 12 1 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER MITIG8 - 2025 Winter Plus PThu Jun 5, 2008 10:01:04 Page 1-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #1 SR 89 South/West River Street ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 60 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED ******************************************************************************** Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.791 Average Delay (sec/veh): 14.4 Level Of Service: B Street Name: SR 89 West River Street Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II Control: Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 I II Volume Module: Base Vol: Growth Adj: Initial Bse: User Adj: PHF Adj: PHF Volume: Reduct Vol: Reduced Vol: PCE Adj: MLF Adj: FinalVolume: Saturation Sat/Lane: Adjustment: Lanes: Final Sat.: Protected Protected Include Ovl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 II II I 0 1521 268 198 459 0 0 0 0 127 0 46 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 1521 268 198 459 0 0 0 0 127 0 46 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0 1601 282 208 483 0 0 0 0 134 0 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1601 282 208 483 0 0 0 0 134 0 48 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 1601 282 208 483 0 0 0 0 134 0 48 II II II Flow Module: 1900 1900 1.00 0.95 0.00 2.00 0 3610 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1615 1805 1900 0 0 0 0 1805 0 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.44 0.17 0.12 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.03 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.56 0.56 0.15 0.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.24 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.79 0.31 0.79 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.79 0.00 0.13 Delay/Veh: 0.0 12.6 7.2 39.7 3.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 48.5 0.0 18.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 12.6 7.2 39.7 3.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 48.5 0.0 18.0 LOS by Move: A B A D A A A A A D A B HCM2kAvgQ: 0 14 3 6 4 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 ******************************************************************************** II II II 1900 0.85 1.00 1615 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER MITIG8 - 2025 Winter Plus PThu Jun 5, 2008 10:02:39 Page 1-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #23 SR 267/Airport Road/Schaffer Mill Road ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 1.488 Loss Time (sec): 16 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 198.2 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: F ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Approach: North Bound Movement: L - T - R L II Control: Rights: Min. Green: Lanes: Protected Include 0 0 1 0 0 1 SR 267 Airport Road/Schaffer Mill Road South Bound East Bound West Bound - T - R L - T - R L - T - R II II Protected Include 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 Split Phase Split Phase Include Include 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 47 1150 67 220 1110 264 408 41 104 71 72 340 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 47 1150 67 220 1110 264 408 41 104 71 72 340 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 49 1211 71 232 1168 278 429 43 109 75 76 358 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 49 1211 71 232 1168 278 429 43 109 75 76 358 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 49 1211 71 232 1168 278 429 43 109 75 76 358 I II II II Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.99 Lanes: 1.00 0.94 Final Sat.: 1805 1781 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.96 0.96 0.85 0.98 0.98 0.85 0.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.09 1.00 0.50 0.50 1.00 104 1805 1900 1615 1652 166 1615 921 934 1615 II II II Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.68 0.68 0.13 0.61 0.17 0.26 0.26 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.22 Crit Moves• **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.02 0.46 0.46 0.09 0.52 0.52 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.15 0.15 0.15 Volume/Cap: 1.18 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.18 0.33 1.49 1.49 0.39 0.55 0.55 1.49 Delay/Veh: 256.6 258 258.3 305.3 122 16.9 285.2 285 44.7 49.6 49.6 291.5 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 256.6 258 258.3 305.3 122 16.9 285.2 285 44.7 49.6 49.6 291.5 LOS by Move: F F F F F B F F D D D F HCM2kAvgQ: 5 98 98 20 67 6 38 38 4 6 6 29 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER MITIG8 - 2025 Winter Plus PThu Jun 5, 2008 10:04:48 Page 1-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #24 267 / Northstar Dr ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 95 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.962 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 39.6 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 94 433 0 0 844 503 1058 0 400 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 94 433 0 0 844 503 1058 0 400 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 99 456 0 0 888 529 1114 0 421 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 99 456 0 0 888 529 1114 0 421 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 99 456 0 0 888 529 1114 0 421 0 0 0 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.92 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1805 1900 0 0 1900 1615 3502 0 1615 0 0 0 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.47 0.33 0.32 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.06 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.49 0.33 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.96 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.96 0.67 0.96 0.00 0.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 120.9 13.4 0.0 0.0 44.4 21.0 49.2 0.0 36.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 120.9 13.4 0.0 0.0 44.4 21.0 49.2 0.0 36.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: F B A A D C D A D A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 6 8 0 0 31 13 22 0 13 0 0 0 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER MITIG8 - 2025 Winter Plus PThu Jun 5, 2008 10:07:05 Page 1-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #25 SR 28/SR 267 ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 95 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.981 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 47.4 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Street Name: SR 267 SR 28 Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Permitted Permitted Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 6 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 1 0 1 551 7 295 195 748 0 3 616 438 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 1 0 1 551 7 295 195 748 0 3 616 438 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 1 0 1 580 7 311 205 787 0 3 648 461 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 1 0 1 580 7 311 205 787 0 3 648 461 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 1 0 1 580 7 311 205 787 0 3 648 461 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.86 1.00 0.86 0.72 0.72 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.94 0.94 Lanes: 0.50 0.00 0.50 0.99 0.01 1.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 1.17 0.83 Final Sat.: 818 0 818 1341 17 1615 1805 3800 0 1805 2083 1481 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.43 0.19 0.11 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.31 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.44 0.00 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.12 0.33 0.00 0.10 0.32 0.32 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.98 0.98 0.44 0.98 0.62 0.00 0.02 0.98 0.98 Delay/Veh: 14.9 0.0 14.9 58.1 58.1 18.8 98.5 27.7 0.0 38.5 54.4 54.4 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 14.9 0.0 14.9 58.1 58.1 18.8 98.5 27.7 0.0 38.5 54.4 54.4 LOS by Move: B A B E E B F C A D D D HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 23 23 6 10 10 0 0 22 22 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER 2025 Plus Project Mitigated SIDRA INTERSECTION VO Movement Summary West River / McIver Xing 2025 Summer PM + Project Mit Roundabout Vehicle Movements 95% Dem Deg of Aver Level Back Ip Turn Flow %HV Satn Delay of of (veh/h) (v/c) (sec) Service Queue (ft) Prop. Eff. Stop Queued Rate Aver Speed (mph) Driveway 3L L 3 25.0 0.054 12.3 LOS B 11 0.78 0.80 14.5 8T T 10 9.1 0.054 7.1 LOS A 11 0.78 0.65 14.2 8R R 10 9.1 0.054 7.5 LOS A 11 0.78 0.58 14.1 Approach 26 11.5 0.054 8.1 LOS A 11 0.78 0.65 14.2 West River 0 L 9 10.0 0.455 5.3 LOS A 103 0.59 0.61 21.4 6T T 353 2.0 0.448 4.0 LOS A 103 0.59 0.48 23.3 6R R 86 2.3 0.448 4.1 LOS A 103 0.59 0.52 22.5 Approach 449 2.2 0.448 4.1 LOS A 103 0.59 0.49 23.1 McIver X-ing 7L L 215 1.9 0.339 8.5 LOS A 49 0.44 0.70 24.2 4T T 10 9.1 0.344 6.0 LOS A 49 0.44 0.64 25.4 4R R 123 1.6 0.340 5.9 LOS A 49 0.44 0.58 26.3 Approach 349 2.0 0.339 7.5 LOS A 49 0.44 0.66 24.9 West River 5L L 2T T 2R R Approach All Vehicles 231 2.2 0.597 10.3 LOS B 147 420 1.9 0.597 5.0 LOS A 147 4 20.0 0.625 8.9 LOS A 147 655 2.1 0.597 6.9 LOS A 147 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61 1479 2.3 0.625 6.2 LOS A 147 0.57 0.70 0.53 0.68 0.59 26.0 28.7 28.5 27.7 0.58 25.1 1 lane, 80' island, 18' circ width MITIG8 - 2025 plus project Fri May 16, 2008 11:15:48 Page 1-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM 4 -Way Stop Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #9 Jibboom and Bridge ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.924 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 37.8 Optimal Cycle: 0 Level Of Service: E ******************************************************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Stop Sign Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1! 0 0 0 0 1! 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1! 0 0 I II II II 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 10 302 62 27 246 116 176 200 141 41 136 36 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 10 302 62 27 246 116 176 200 141 41 136 36 Added Vol: 2 30 0 0 29 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 12 332 62 27 275 116 176 200 143 41 136 36 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 13 349 65 28 289 122 185 211 151 43 143 38 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 13 349 65 28 289 122 185 211 151 43 143 38 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 13 349 65 28 289 122 185 211 151 43 143 38 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.03 0.82 0.15 0 06 0.66 0.28 1.00 0.58 0.42 0.19 0.64 0.17 Final Sat.: 14 384 72 31 313 132 408 262 187 77 254 67 I II II II 1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.91 0.91 0.91 0 92 0.92 0.92 0.45 0.80 0.80 0.56 0.56 0.56 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Delay/Veh: 47.1 47.1 47.1 49.3 49.3 49.3 18.0 33.5 33.5 20.6 20.6 20.6 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 47.1 47.1 47.1 49.3 49.3 49.3 18.0 33.5 33.5 20.6 20.6 20.6 LOS by Move: E E E E E E C D D C C C ApproachDel: 47.1 49.3 28.2 20.6 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ApprAdjDel: 47.1 49.3 28.2 20.6 LOS by Appr: E E D C AllWayAvgQ: 4.8 4.8 4.8 5.1 5.1 5.1 0.8 2.9 2.9 1.0 1.0 1.0 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER MITIG8 - 2025 plus project Fri May 16, 2008 12:10:12 Page 1-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #13 I-80 EB/DPR Eastern ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 60 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.840 Loss Time (sec): 8 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 18.4 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: B ******************************************************************************** Street Name: Approach: Movement: DPR North Bound South Bound L - T - R L - T - R L I II II Control: Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 II Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 640 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 640 Added Vol: 0 126 PasserByVol: 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 766 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 0 849 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 849 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 849 0 0 II Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 1900 0 0 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.45 0.00 Crit Moves: Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.53 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.84 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 18.3 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 18.3 0.0 LOS by Move: A B A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 16 0 ******************************************************************************** **** II I-80 EB East Bound West Bound - T - R L - T - R II I Protected Include 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 II Protected Include 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 II 0 0 0 0 479 0 458 0 196 0 0 0 1 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 0 479 0 458 0 196 0 0 0 0 0 75 0 0 0 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 554 0 458 0 237 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0 614 0 507 0 263 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 614 0 507 0 263 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 614 0 507 0 263 0 0 II II 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 0 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1900 0 1805 0 1615 0 0 0 II II 0.00 0.32 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 **** **** 0.00 0.53 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.61 0.00 0.84 0.00 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 10.8 0.0 28.6 0.0 16.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0 10.8 0.0 28.6 0.0 16.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 A B A C A B A A A 0 9 0 12 0 4 0 0 0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER Movement Summary Page 1 of 1 SIDRA INTERSECTION 1▪ 1111 Movement Summary DPR/ I80 EB 2025 Summer PM Plus Project Roundabout Vehicle Movements Mov ID Turn Dem Flow %HV (veh/h) Deg of Aver Satn Delay (v/c) (sec) 95% Level of Back of Prop. Eff. Stop Service Queue Queued Rate (ft) Aver Speed (mph) DPR NB 8T T 833 2.0 0.994 34.7 LOS C 793 1.00 1.69 18.8 Approach 833 2.0 0.994 34.7 LOS C 793 1.00 1.69 18.8 DPR SB 4T T 602 2.0 0.351 4.7 LOS A 0 0.00 0.40 35.2 Approach 602 2.0 0.351 4.7 LOS A 0.00 0.40 35.2 I 80 EB Off Ramp 5L L 503 2.0 0.781 23.2 LOS C 278 0.83 1.07 28.5 2R R 258 1.9 0.781 17.6 LOS B 278 0.83 1.05 31.6 Approach 760 2.0 0.781 21.3 LOS C 278 0.83 1.06 29.4 All Vehicles 2195 2.0 0.994 21.9 LOS C 793 0.67 1.12 25.2 Symbols which may appear in this table: Following Degree of Saturation # x = 1.00 for Short Lane with resulting Excess Flow * x = 1.00 due to minimum capacity Following LOS # - Based on density for continuous movements Following Queue # - Density for continuous movement SIDRA SOL JTw:,r S Site: New Site - 1 P:\Truckee Railyard EIR\TraffixSidraSynchro\Sidra\2025\DPR I80 EB+ProBig.aap Processed Sep 24, 2008 05:06:47PM A0606, LSC, Inc„ Small Office Produced by SIDRA Intersection 3.2.0.1455 Copyright 2000-2007 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd www.sidrasolutions.com about:blank 9/24/2008 SIDRA INTERSECTION 41111 .00 NO Movement Summary DPR and Pioneer Trail 2025 DPR and Pioneer Trail 2 Lane Plus Pro Roundabout Vehicle Movements 95% Mov Dem Deg of Aver Level Back Prop. Eff. Stop Aver Turn Flow %HV Satn Delay of of Speed ID (veh/h) (v/c) (sec) Service Queue Queued Rate m h ( P ) (ft) DPR 3L L 218 1.8 0.657 18.2 LOS B 191 0.87 1.05 26.0 8T T 807 2.0 0.657 11.1 LOS B 196 0.88 1.00 29.5 8R R 22 4.5 0.667 12.6 LOS B 196 0.88 1.01 28.8 Approach 1046 2.0 0.657 12.6 LOS B 196 0.88 1.01 28.6 TDRPD 1L L 21 4.8 0.061 16.7 LOS B 10 0.83 0.90 17.9 6T T 5 16.7 0.060 8.7 LOS A 11 0.84 0.82 18.6 6R R 18 5.3 0.060 9.3 LOS A 11 0.84 0.80 18.4 Approach 46 6.5 0.060 12.6 LOS B 11 0.84 0.85 18.2 DPR 7L L 18 5.3 0.487 8.5 LOS A 108 0.56 0.67 26.3 4T T 539 2.0 0.485 5.7 LOS A 109 0.56 0.52 29.7 4R R 541 2.0 0.485 6.2 LOS A 109 0.55 0.58 28.8 Approach 1099 2.1 0.485 6.0 LOS A 109 0.55 0.55 29.2 Pioneer Trail 5L L 613 2.0 0.673 16.1 LOS B 196 0.82 1.01 25.1 2T T 4 20.0 0.385 8.1 LOS A 65 0.68 0.82 28.0 2R R 249 2.0 0.381 9.6 LOS A 65 0.68 0.82 28.6 Approach 867 2.1 0.673 14.2 LOS B 196 0.78 0.95 26.0 All Vehicles 2 lane, 100' island, 30' circ 3058 2.1 0.673 10.7 LOS B 196 0.73 0.83 27.7 SIDRA, INTERSECTION Movement Summary SR 267 / I80 EB 2025 Summer PM + Pro MIT NBR Slip Lane Roundabout Vehicle Movements 95% Dem Deg of Aver Level Back ID Turn Flow 0/01 -IV Satn Delay of of (veh/h) (v/c) (sec) Service Queue (ft) Prop. Eff. Stop Queued Rate Aver Speed (mph) 267 NB 8T T 1458 2.0 0.737 15.1 LOS B 242 0.80 0.97 33.3 8R R 592 2.0 0.544 13.5 LOS B 114 0.61 0.81 37.0 Approach 2051 2.0 0.738 14.7 LOS B 242 0.74 0.93 34.4 267 SB 7L L 511 2.0 0.478 13.2 LOS B 0 0.00 0.73 29.9 4T T 1052 2.0 0.478 5.6 LOS A 0 0.00 0.46 33.8 Approach 1563 2.0 0.478 8.1 LOS A 0.00 0.54 32.3 I 80 EB Off Ramp 5L L 62 1.6 0.118 19.5 LOS B 12 0.60 0.90 30.3 2T T 1 50.0 0.118 14.7 LOS B 12 0.60 0.84 36.5 2R R 793 2.0 0.879 23.9 LOS C 301 0.89 1.26 29.9 Approach 858 2.1 0.880 23.6 LOS C 301 0.87 1.23 30.0 All Vehicles 4472 2.0 0.879 14.1 LOS B 301 0.51 0.85 32.7 2 lane, 100' island, 34' circ, NBR Slip Lane SIDRA INTERSECTION 41.11 a ,. Movement Summary SR 267/ISO WB 2025 Summer PM + Pro MIT w/ Loop Ramp Roundabout Vehicle Movements 95% Dem Deg of Aver Level Back Mov Turn Flow 0/01-1V Satn Delay of of (veh/h) (v/c) (sec) Service Queue (ft) Prop. Eff. Stop Queued Rate Aver Speed (mph) 267 NB 3L L 5 16.7 0.222 13.9 LOS B 0 0.00 0.71 30.1 8T T 736 2.0 0.222 1.9 LOS A 0 0.00 0.20 33.3 Approach 742 2.2 0.222 2.0 LOS A 0.00 0.20 33.3 I 80 WB Off Ramp 0 L 432 2.1 0.418 16.7 LOS B 56 0.52 0.85 32.0 6T T 14 7.1 0.378 9.9 LOS A 48 0.48 0.63 39.2 6R R 443 2.0 0.381 9.8 LOS A 48 0.48 0.67 36.9 Approach 889 2.1 0.418 13.1 LOS B 56 0.50 0.75 34.2 267 SB/ SR 89 N 4T T 1008 2.0 0.561 4.3 LOS A 124 0.63 0.49 29.8 4R R 241 2.1 0.560 7.7 LOS A 124 0.63 0.66 31.0 Approach 1249 2.0 0.561 5.0 LOS A 124 0.63 0.52 30.0 All Vehicles 2880 2.1 0.561 6.7 LOS A 124 2 lane, 160' island, 34' cir, Loop ramp for WB 0.43 0.51 32.1 MITIG8 - 2025 plus project Fri May 16, 2008 15:02:05 Page 1-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #22 SR 267/Brockway Road/Joerger Drive ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 80 Loss Time (sec): 16 (Y+R=4.0 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED ******************************************************************************** Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.913 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 38.7 Level Of Service: D Approach: North Bound South Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R I it Control: Protected Protected Rights: Include Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 2 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 I II Volume Module: Base Vol: 369 Growth Adj: 1.00 Initial Bse: 369 Added Vol: 57 PasserByVol: 0 Initial Fut: 426 User Adj: 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 PHF Volume: 472 Reduct Vol: 0 Reduced Vol: PCE Adj: MLF Adj: FinalVolume: East Bound L - T - R II Split Phase Ovl 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 West Bound L - T - R II I Split Phase Ovl 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 it 0 1 1106 84 184 1000 545 472 186 275 128 233 352 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1106 84 184 1000 545 472 186 275 128 233 352 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 61 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1106 84 184 1000 545 472 212 336 128 258 352 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 1225 93 204 1108 604 523 235 372 142 286 390 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 472 1225 93 204 1108 604 523 235 372 142 286 390 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 472 1225 93 204 1108 604 523 235 372 142 286 390 II II II Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: Adjustment: Lanes: Final Sat.: 1900 1900 0.95 1.00 2.00 2.00 3610 3800 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1615 1805 3800 1615 3610 1900 1615 1805 1900 1615 II II II Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.32 0.06 0.11 0.29 0.37 0.14 0.12 0.23 0.08 0.15 0.24 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.15 0.35 0.35 0.12 0.33 0.49 0.16 0.16 0.31 0.16 0.16 0.29 Volume/Cap: 0.89 0.91 0.16 0.91 0.89 0.77 0.91 0.78 0.75 0.48 0.91 0.84 Delay/Veh: 49.7 34.5 17.9 72.0 33.3 21.3 52.3 44.6 31.5 31.5 62.5 39.3 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 49.7 34.5 17.9 72.0 33.3 21.3 52.3 44.6 31.5 31.5 62.5 39.3 LOS by Move: D C B E C C D D C C E D HCM2kAvgQ: 9 19 2 8 17 14 10 8 10 4 11 12 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER MITIG8 - 2025 plus project Fri May 16, 2008 15:02:46 Page 1-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #23 SR 267/Airport Road/Schaffer Mill Road ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 70 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.910 Loss Time (sec): 16 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 32.1 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: C ******************************************************************************** Street Name: SR 267 Airport Road/Schaffer Mill Road Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II Control: Rights: Min. Green: Lanes: Protected Include 0 0 1 0 1 1 Volume Module: Base Vol: 28 1009 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 28 1009 Added Vol: 0 40 PasserByVol: 0 0 Initial Fut: 28 1049 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 31 1162 Reduct Vol: 0 0 Reduced Vol: 31 1162 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 31 1162 Saturation Sat/Lane: Adjustment: Lanes: Final Sat.: Protected Include 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 II Split Phase Include 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 II II Split Phase Include 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 48 107 967 231 337 28 52 60 22 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 48 107 967 231 337 28 52 60 22 0 7 43 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 114 1010 237 343 28 52 60 22 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 53 126 1119 263 380 31 58 66 24 116 1.00 116 6 0 122 1.00 0.90 135 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 126 1119 263 380 31 58 66 24 135 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 53 126 1119 263 380 31 58 66 24 135 II II II Flow Module: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.96 0.96 0.85 0.97 0.97 0.85 1.00 1.91 0.09 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.92 0.08 1.00 0.73 0.27 1.00 1805 3608 165 1805 3800 1615 1679 137 1615 1342 492 1615 I II II II Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.32 0.32 0.07 0.29 0.16 0.23 0.23 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.08 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.02 0.35 0.35 0.08 0.41 0.41 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.09 0.09 0.09 Volume/Cap: 0.72 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.72 0.40 0.91 0.91 0.14 0.54 0.54 0.91 Delay/Veh: 79.9 31.0 31.0 82.3 19.2 15.1 47.8 47.8 20.7 33.8 33.8 79.5 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 79.9 31.0 31.0 82.3 19.2 15.1 47.8 47.8 20.7 33.8 33.8 79.5 LOS by Move: E C C F B B D D C C C E HCM2kAvgQ: 2 17 17 6 12 4 13 13 1 3 3 6 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER SIDRA INTERSECTION Movement Summary SR 89 S / DPR/ Frates 2025 Summer PM Pk Plus Project Roundabout Vehicle Movements 95% Dem Deg of Aver Level Back ID Turn Flow %HV Satn Delay of of (veh/h) (v/c) (sec) Service Queue (ft) Prop. Eff. Stop Queued Rate Aver Speed (mph) SR 89 S 3L L 507 2.0 0.538 11.5 LOS B 121 0.69 0.85 21.6 8T T 123 1.6 0.416 3.5 LOS A 75 0.62 0.49 22.7 8R R 229 2.2 0.416 6.5 LOS A 75 0.62 0.70 23.2 Approach 860 2.0 0.538 9.0 LOS A 121 0.66 0.76 22.2 DPR WB 0 L 580 2.1 0.685 15.9 LOS B 175 0.81 1.04 26.4 6T T 437 2.1 0.637 10.5 LOS B 147 0.78 0.96 29.9 6R R 64 1.6 0.640 11.4 LOS B 147 0.78 0.98 28.9 Approach 1081 2.0 0.685 13.5 LOS B 175 0.79 1.00 27.8 Frates 7L L 102 2.0 0.391 18.0 LOS B 69 0.84 1.01 20.2 4T T 177 2.3 0.392 10.0 LOS B 74 0.85 0.94 21.2 4R R 83 2.4 0.392 11.8 LOS B 74 0.86 0.97 21.5 Approach 362 2.2 0.391 12.7 LOS B 74 0.85 0.97 21.0 DPR EB 5L L 101 2.0 0.580 16.7 LOS B 130 0.82 1.02 25.6 2T T 267 1.9 0.579 12.9 LOS B 130 0.82 0.99 29.1 2R R 532 2.1 0.728 15.2 LOS B 217 0.91 1.11 26.5 Approach 900 2.0 0.728 14.7 LOS B 217 0.87 1.06 27.2 All Vehicles 3203 2.0 0.728 12.5 LOS B 217 0.79 0.95 24.9 2 lane, 30' circ, 75' island MITIG8 - 2025 plus project Wed Sep 24, 2008 14:26:11 Page 1-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #28 89 south / DPR ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 85 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.988 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 50.7 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: D ************************************'******************************************** Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ovl Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 469 116 218 96 167 79 96 236 493 540 397 60 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 469 116 218 96 167 79 96 236 493 540 397 60 Added Vol: 13 1 0 1 1 0 0 18 12 11 18 1 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 482 117 218 97 168 79 96 254 505 551 415 61 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 507 123 229 102 177 83 101 267 532 580 437 64 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 507 123 229 102 177 83 101 267 532 580 437 64 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 507 123 229 102 177 83 101 267 532 580 437 64 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 0.35 0.65 0.56 0.98 0.46 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1805 599 1115 970 1679 790 1805 1900 1615 1805 1900 1615 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.28 0.21 0.21 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.06 0.14 0.33 0.32 0.23 0.04 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.28 0.26 0.26 0.13 0.11 0.11 0.09 0.14 0.43 0.33 0.38 0.38 Volume/Cap: 0.99 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.99 0.99 0.61 0.99 0.77 0.99 0.61 0.11 Delay/Veh: 66.7 39.0 39.0 45.1 81.5 81.5 43.7 87.6 26.1 62.5 23.0 17.3 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 66.7 39.0 39.0 45.1 81.5 81.5 43.7 87.6 26.1 62.5 23.0 17.3 LOS by Move: E D D D F F D F C E C B HCM2kAvgQ: 20 11 11 7 9 9 4 12 14 22 10 1 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** MITIG8 - 2025 Winter No ProThu Jun 5, 2008 10:29:40 Page 1-1 Truckee RailYard Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******************************************************************************** Intersection #23 SR 267/Airport Road/Schaffer Mill Road ******************************************************************************** Cycle (sec): 105 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.948 Loss Time (sec): 16 (Y+R=4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 46.7 Optimal Cycle: OPTIMIZED Level Of Service: D ******************************************************************************** Street Name: SR 267 Airport Road/Schaffer Mill Road Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R I II II II I Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase Rights: Include Include Include Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 I II II II I Volume Module: Base Vol: 47 1110 67 213 1067 258 402 41 104 71 72 334 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 47 1110 67 213 1067 258 402 41 104 71 72 334 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 49 1168 71 224 1123 272 423 43 109 75 76 352 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 49 1168 71 224 1123 272 423 43 109 75 76 352 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 49 1168 71 224 1123 272 423 43 109 75 76 352 I II II II I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.95 1.00 0.85 0.96 0.96 0.85 0.98 0.98 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 1.89 0.11 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.91 0.09 1.00 0.50 0.50 1.00 Final Sat.: 1805 3551 214 1805 3800 1615 1650 168 1615 921 934 1615 I II II II I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.33 0.33 0.12 0.30 0.17 0.26 0.26 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.22 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.04 0.35 0.35 0.13 0.44 0.44 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.10 0.10 0.23 Volume/Cap: 0.68 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.68 0.38 0.95 0.95 0.25 0.82 0.82 0.95 Delay/Veh: 71.9 47.6 47.6 89.2 24.7 20.3 65.4 65.4 30.3 71.4 71.4 73.1 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 71.9 47.6 47.6 89.2 24.7 20.3 65.4 65.4 30.3 71.4 71.4 73.1 LOS by Move: E D D F C C E E C E E E HCM2kAvgQ: 3 24 24 11 15 6 20 20 3 7 7 16 ******************************************************************************** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ******************************************************************************** Traffix 7.9.0415 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSC DENVER TABLE _: Placer County "Tahoe Resorts Benefit District" Projects_yj Street/Intersection Segment Description Funded by TIF? Alpine Meadows Road Various Locations Traffic flow improvements Yes National Kings Beach Misc shoulder Improvements Yes From SR 267 to Sawmill Flat Road 4 lanes No At Big Springs Intersection improvements No North Tahoe N Stateline to Tahoe City Traffic flow/Safety impr Yes North Star Drive Squaw Valley Road Traffic flow improvements Yes Square Valley Road Shoulder/Bike/Ped improvements No County Line to Northstar Drive Widen to 4 lanes Yes At Northstar Drive Signalize and intersection improvements No N. of Brockway Summit Extend SB truck climbing lane to summit Yes S. of Brockway Summit Construct NB passing lane Yes SR 267 Route 2 transit vehicles Yes State Route 267 Squaw Valley Road SR 267 Route 2 transit vehicles Yes Various Locations Left turn/accel lanes Yes Tahoe City Traffic flow improvements Yes Kings Beach Bike lanes/Shoulders/Curb,Gutter,Sidewalks Yes Kings Beach Improve 28/267 Intx Yes Kings Beach SR28/Coon St. Intx Yes Kings Beach SR28/Bear St. Intx Yes State Route 28 g Kings Beach SR 28/ National Avenue Yes Tahoe Vista to Tahoe City Traffic flow improvements Yes Tahoe Vista Shoulders/Pedestrian Enhancements Yes Intersection 267/28 Intelligent Transportation Systems Yes West River Street Trafic Signal &Hwy. Improvements Yes SR 28 to Granlibakken Road Traffic flow improvements Yes SttR t89 Granlibakken Road to County Line Traffic flow improvements Yes Truckee River Crossing Realign/Improve Existing Route Yes SR 89 near Fairway Drive Intelligent Transportation Systems Yes Tahoe City Tahoe City Tahoe City Transit Improvements Yes West Shore Tahoe City to ED County Line Traffic flow/Safety Impr Yes N/A Cabin Creek CNG Improvements Yes N/A Along Transit Routes Transit shelters/park and ride facilities Yes State Route 89 N/A Along Transit Routes Transit shelters/park and ride facilities Yes Source: Placer County Dept. of Public Works