HomeMy Public PortalAbout2022-09-27 Joint Town Council and Planning Commission MeetingJoint Town Council and Planning Commission MeetingSeptember 27, 2022 Page 1 of 3
Joint Town Council and Planning Commission Meeting Agenda
September 27, 2022, 5:00 PM
Town Hall – Administrative Center | 10183 Truckee Airport Road, Truckee, CA
Comments sent through the public comment form before 2:00 p.m. will be sent to Councilmembers and
Town Department Heads as well as uploaded to public view by 2:30 p.m. Click here to submit Public
Comment to Council.
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call: Council Members; Zabriskie, Polivy, Klovstad, Vice Mayor Romack, Mayor Henderson,
Planning Commissioners Riley, Fraiman, Vice Chair Tarnay and Chair Gove.
3. Pledge of Allegiance
4. Public Comment - This is an opportunity for members of the public to address the Council on
items that are not on this agenda. Please state your name for the record. Comments are limited
to three minutes. Under state law, the Council cannot take action on an item not on the agenda.
The Council may choose to acknowledge the comment or, where appropriate, briefly answer a
question, refer the matter to staff, or set the item for discussion at a future meeting.
5. Presentations
5.1 Introduction of New Staff Kelly Carpenter, Deputy Clerk; and Conor Drewes, IT Technician.
5.2 Town Manager Report.
6. Consent Calendar
6.1 Minutes of August 23, 2022 Closed Session and Joint Council Planning Commission
Meeting.
Recommended Action: Approve the minutes.
6.2 Consider Resolution 2022-61 Opposing Ballot Measure V, a ½ Percent General Sales Tax
Increase.
Recommended Action: Consider Resolution 2022-61 opposing ballot Measure V, a ½ percent
general sales tax increase.
6.3 Reconnecting Communities Grant Application for Downtown Truckee Railroad Pedestrian
Crossing Plan.
Recommended Action: Council adopt Resolution 2022-59 requesting Reconnecting
Communities planning grant program funds for the Downtown Truckee Railroad Pedestrian
Crossing feasibility analysis and preliminary plans.
6.4 Easement Abandonment, 14865 and 14879 Northwoods Blvd. (APNs 044-240-013 and 044-
240-012); Owners: Dennis and Julia Startsev; Application 2022-00000005/ABN.
Recommended Action: (1) Adopt Resolution 2022-58 approving the abandonment of the public
utility easement along the shared (side) property line 14865 and 14879 Northwoods Blvd. (APNs
044-240-013 and 044-240-012); Lots 302 and 301 of the Tahoe Donner Unit 4); and (2) Authorize
Page 1
Joint Town Council and Planning Commission MeetingSeptember 27, 2022 Page 2 of 3
the Town Manager to sign the Indemnification Agreement between the Town of Truckee and
Dennis and Julia Startsev regarding APNs 044-240-013 and 044-240-012.
6.5 Adoption of Plan Including Policies and Procedures to Ensure Protection and Non-
Discrimination of Transit Riders.
Recommended Action: Town Council approve Resolution 2022-60 adopting the “Town of
Truckee 2022 - 2025 Truckee Tahoe Area Regional Transit (TART) Title VI Compliance Plan”
(Plan) and authorizing the Town Manager to sign the Plan and implement the associated policies
and procedures.
6.6 2022 Recessed Striping Project, C2003 – Contract Award.
Recommended Action: Town Council award the 2022 Recessed Striping Project to Specialized
Pavement Marking in the amount of $252,626.50; authorize a project contingency amount of
$25,263 (10%); and authorize the Town Engineer to approve contract change orders or changes
to unit quantities within the approved contingency amount for a total authorized contract
expenditure amount of $277,889.50.
6.7 West River Street Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1 Town Vote.
Recommended Action: Authorize Town Manager to cast a ballot to vote in the affirmative for the
West River Street Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1.
7. Workshop Item
7.1 Joint Council/Planning Commission Study Session – Direction on Draft 2040 General Plan.
Recommended Action: Town Council and Planning Commission discuss changes, edits,
responses to comments, and additional information prepared by staff thus far, and since the
spring/summer kick-off of the 2040 General Plan Update adoption process, provide direction to
staff.
8. Council Reports
9. Adjournment
To the Joint Council and Planning Commission Meeting October 11, 2022, and Planning Commission
October 18, 2022 5:00 p.m. at Town Hall, 10183 Truckee Airport Road, Truckee, CA.
Town of Truckee Redevelopment Successor Agency – Notice of Cancellation
The September 27, 2022 regular meeting of the Redevelopment Successor Agency is hereby
cancelled. Regular meetings are scheduled for the second and fourth Tuesday of each month,
immediately following the Town of Truckee Council meeting.
Town of Truckee Public Financing Authority – Notice of Cancellation
The September 27, 2022 regular meeting of the Truckee Public Financing Authority is hereby
cancelled. Regular meetings are scheduled for the second and fourth Tuesday of each month,
immediately following the Town of Truckee Council meeting.
Posting: I declare a copy of this agenda was posted at Town Hall, 10183 Truckee Airport Road,
Truckee, CA, on September 22, 2022, by 5:00 p.m. Agenda packets will be available for public review
September 22, 2022, after 5:00 p.m. at Town Hall, Truckee Library, and online at
www.townoftruckee.com.
Page 2
Joint Town Council and Planning Commission MeetingSeptember 27, 2022 Page 3 of 3
____________________________
Sarah Ring, Administrative Technician
on behalf of Judy Price, MMC, Town Clerk
Note: As a sustainable practice, a separate agenda for the Truckee Redevelopment Successor Agency and Public Financing
Authority will be provided only if there are items to consider. If the meeting is cancelled, the agenda will be combined with the
Council Agenda. If there are items for the Truckee Redevelopment Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority to
consider a separate agenda for that body will be produced.
Note: Public participation is encouraged. In compliance with Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42
U.S.C. Sec. 12132) and in compliance with the Ralph M. Brown Act, If you plan on attending the public meeting and need a
special accommodation because of a sensory or mobility impairment/disability, or have a need for an interpreter, please
contact Judy Price, Town Clerk, at 530- 582-2924, 48 hours in advance of the meeting to arrange for those accommodations
to be made. For information on recent changes to the Ralph M. Brown Act (effective January 1, 2003) with regard to ADA
requirements please see Government Codes 54953.2, 54954.1, 54954.2, and 54957.5.
Note: The times posted on this agenda are estimates used for meeting management guidance. These estimated times should
not be considered as a binding start time for the purpose of agenda item consideration.
Page 3
Closed Session August 23, 2022 Page 1 of 1
Closed Session Minutes
August 23, 2022, 4:00 PM
Town Hall – Administrative Center | 10183 Truckee Airport Road, Truckee, CA
1. Call to Order – Mayor Henderson called the meeting to order at 4:15 p.m.
2. Roll Call: Council Members; Zabriskie, Romack, Polivy, Vice Mayor Henderson, and Mayor
Klovstad.
Staff Present: Bonnie Thompson-Hardin, Human Resources Administrator; Nicole Casey,
Administrative Services Director; Andy Morris, Town Attorney; and Jen Callaway, Town Manager.
3. Pledge of Allegiance – deferred.
4. Public Comment - This is an opportunity for members of the public to address the Council on
items which are not on this agenda. Please state your name for the record. Comments are
limited to three minutes. Written comments should be submitted to the Town Clerk 24 hours prior
to the meeting to allow for distribution. Under state law the Council cannot take action on an item
not on the agenda. The Council may choose to acknowledge the comment or, where appropriate,
briefly answer a question, refer the matter to staff, or set the item for discussion at a future
meeting.
5. Closed Session
5.1 Conference with Labor Negotiators – Agency designated representatives: Bonnie Thompson-
Hardin, Human Resources Administrator; Nicole Casey, Administrative Services Director; Andy
Morris, Town Attorney and Jen Callaway, Town Manager, Employee Organization: Mid-Managers
Association, Police Officers Association, and/or General Employees Association, Government
Code Section 54957.
Reportable Action: No Reportable Action Taken.
6. Adjournment - 4:45 p.m.
To the Joint Town Council and Planning Commission Meeting of August 23, 2022, 5:00 P.M. at
Town Hall, 10183 Truckee Airport Road, Truckee, CA.
Respectfully submitted by: Approved:
Sarah Ring, Administrative Technician, on
behalf of Judy Price, MMC, Town Clerk
Courtney Henderson, Mayor
Page 4
Item 6.1
Joint Town Council Planning Commission MeetingAugust 23, 2022 Page 1 of 6
Joint Town Council Planning Commission Meeting Minutes
August 23, 2022, 5:00 PM
Town Hall – Administrative Center | 10183 Truckee Airport Road, Truckee, CA
1. Call to Order – Mayor Henderson called the meeting to order at 5:03 p.m.
2. Roll Call: Council Member Zabriskie, Council Member Klovstad, Vice Mayor Romack, and Mayor
Henderson, Planning Commissioner Riley, and Vice Chair Tarnay.
Absent: Council Member Polivy, Planning Commissioner Fraiman, and Chair Gove.
Staff Present: Denyelle Nishimori, Community Development Director; Jenna Gatto, Planning
Manager; Jen Callaway, Town Manager; Becky Bucar, Acting Director of Public Works; Nicole
Casey, Administrative Services Director; Andy Morris, Town Attorney; Sarah Ring, Administrative
Technician; Danny Renfrow, Interim Chief of Police; and Hilary Hobbs, Assistant to the Town
Manager.
3. Pledge of Allegiance – recited in unison.
Mayor Henderson requested two moments of silence in recognition of Kiley Rodni and David
Horan.
Mayor Henderson called for a brief recess at 5:10 p.m.
Mayor Henderson resumed the meeting at 5:15 p.m.
4. Public Comment -
Mayor Henderson opened public comment.
Verbal comment received from:
Peter Warble, Steve Trembley, Joe Smith, Bonnie Miller-Smith, JD Hoss, and Commissioner
Tarnay.
Written comment received from:
Joe Smith
Mayor Henderson closed public comment.
5. Presentations
5.1 Town Manager Report.
Nothing to report.
Page 5
Item 6.1
Joint Town Council Planning Commission MeetingAugust 23, 2022 Page 2 of 6
6. Workshop Items
6.1 Continued discussion of the Draft 2040 General Plan Conservation and Open Space
Element.
Recommended Action: That the Council and Planning Commission continue to review the draft
2040 General Plan Open Spaces Element and provide feedback to staff.
Denyelle Nishimori, Community Development Director presented from the staff report (on file with
Town Clerk).
Council and Planning Commission Clarifying Questions:
Staff is currently using the August 12th version and will catalog but cross reference previous
versions.
Converting septic to sewer:
o Protecting soils and groundwater
o Housing implications are that it is currently hard to add ADUs to properties with septic.
o The Town hasn’t actively been involved in the conversations, there are various
locations around Town that are currently still on septic.
Staff can provide data as to how many residential properties are on septic.
Mayor Henderson re-opened the presentation to public comment.
Verbal comment received from:
Richard Anderson, Kathy Echols, JD Hoss, and Sophia Heidrich.
Written public comment was received by:
Mike Wolf, Patrick Flora, Richard Anderson, and Troy Corliss.
Mayor Henderson closed public comment.
Discussion:
Question 1. What should the Town’s role in converting neighborhoods currently on septic
to sewer?
The Town does not immediately have much of a role.
The Town could potentially help facilitate conversations between the property owners with
entering into:
o line extension agreements
o assessment districts
o Town does not have a role in paying for conversions.
The Town is not able to dictate how the Truckee Sanitary District (TSD) extends its lines.
The Town could dedicate staff resources to help facilitate conversations with districts as
currently this is not addressed in the current general plan.
Consider as a part of our Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) incentive program?
With the potential of a Community Facilities District (CFD), helping property owners
understand could help facilitate movement on conversion.
The existing plant does have capacity based on the data from the recent Environmental
Impact Report (EIR).
Supportive of adding support language in the General Plan Update.
Page 6
Item 6.1
Joint Town Council Planning Commission MeetingAugust 23, 2022 Page 3 of 6
Council already has open language in its goals and workplan to engage in community
partnerships.
Council can try to engage, but that engagement may not go anywhere.
Town staff sees plans for ADUs on septic systems and could communicate to adjacent
neighbors who could combine efforts to expand the septic system or sewer lines.
o Opportunity point with Nevada County Environmental Health upon review upon
submission of ADUs permits.
Question 2. Does the draft plan provide the right balance of preservation goals for the
Truckee River and Donner Lake with also providing equitable access to recreation
opportunities.
Looking for the preservation of Donner Lake and the Truckee River to maintain our
recreation of those resources.
Staff provided a status of the state of recreational impact on those resources.
Want greater protection for the resources, less emphasis on access.
Becky Bucar, Engineering Manager spoke on behalf of the Donner Lake Stewardship
Committee.
Topics being discussed:
o Areas of stewardship.
o Analysis of Donner Lake, what the existing conditions are.
o Recreational impacts, erosion, big picture, etc.
o Draft actions are being developed.
o Looking to present to Council in an upcoming meeting.
o Looking for a partnership with the groups in a Memorandum of Understanding
(MOU).
Add language “to maximum extent feasible” and apply to the entire watershed?
Carrying capacity language should be added into the document as well as amending the
mid-term language as that term was already mentioned in the previous General Plan.
o Carrying capacity will be addressed when Council prioritizes these efforts as action
items in staff work program.
Add stronger language to protect Donner Lake from recreation impacts.
We cannot manage influx of visitors.
We don’t need to pay to promote tourism, how do we manage and limit visitors.
Need stronger language-shall vs. should.
Off-road parking is a significant impact to Donner Lake and the Truckee River resources
and is not sustainable.
We still need to be equitable and carrying capacity or enacting permits to access
resources needs to be thought out.
Consider how to incorporate Visit Truckee-Tahoe (VTT) in sustainable tourism efforts.
Summary of the previous two elements discussion in prior:
Draft of Community Character.
Draft of Economic Development Element.
Final Thoughts in reference to Community Character and Economic Development Element:
Protection of our water system beyond Town boundaries; apply to the watershed
Add language “to maximum extent feasible” and apply to the entire watershed and
forestland.
Reference to preserving views: rather than having a mandate of protecting views of
forests, would prefer to figure out impacts to our other town goals with this policy.
Page 7
Item 6.1
Joint Town Council Planning Commission MeetingAugust 23, 2022 Page 4 of 6
Minimize the competition between protecting views and what this does to other priorities.
o Kick this to staff to determine what this could look like:
Preservation study
Objective design standards
Reforestation for sage brush and replanting of conifers
Need to modify the policy language about managing healthy forests.
Emphasize our interest in reducing sprawl.
Due to the agenda stating the continuation of the Open Space element specifically,
Commissioners and Council are allowed only a single comment to wrap up the full
discussion including the previous meetings items.
o The LatinX community is visibly not present in the conversation and overall, there
is a lack of public input.
o This is a time to ramp up community outreach in the process.
Mayor Henderson adjourned for a brief recess at 6:57.
Mayor Henderson reconvened the meeting at 7:12 p.m.
6.2 Joint Council/Planning Commission Study Session – Review of Draft 2040 General Plan
Environmental Impact Report.
Recommended Action: That the Council and Planning Commission receive an update on the
Draft 2040 General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and an overview of its findings.
Jenna Gatto, Planning Manager, presented from the staff report (on file with Town Clerk).
Council and Planning Commission Clarifying Questions:
The 50,000-population number brought up by public, is not considering the roughly 50
percent second homeownership contingent that does not live here full time.
o This number is looking at maximum buildout.
o The buildout number extends beyond the year 2040; there is no date on that, but
its out in the future.
The Town does not have any jurisdiction over utilities, and special districts.
o Policies exist that require the Town to coordinate on future development.
o Special districts were provided a copy of both the EIR and the Draft General Plan
and can provide comment on both documents.
State recognizes that the Town may not meet our greenhouse gas (GHG) 2045 goals as
they are also not meeting their own goals for GHG b.
The Town can do more regular updates to the thresholds of significance to help meet the
Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) thresholds.
The EIR was prepared before the Climate Action Plan, though, the general direction of
staff from Council is to increase measures to reduce emissions.
CEQA encourages environmental review to be done early, however, not duplicative, or
superfluous environmental review.
Public will have an opportunity to comment when future projects are brought before
Council.
What control does the hospital have over their growth area?
o Impacts of development.
o What types of development
o Hospital is not included in the EIR and the General Plan.
Town does have control at the land use designation.
There will be a master plan process that will be required through the Town.
Town has received reports that show sewer metric numbers are now pretty consistent with
pre-pandemic levels.
Page 8
Item 6.1
Joint Town Council Planning Commission MeetingAugust 23, 2022 Page 5 of 6
Mayor Henderson opened the presentation items to public comment.
Verbal comment received from:
JD Hoss and Sophia Heidrich.
Mayor Henderson closed public comment.
Council and Planning Commission Direction:
Staff to provide a slide comparing 2025 to 2040 for alternatives 3 or 4.
Consider Coffee Talks sessions in early September.
Upon consideration, Council agreed that they will hold to the 45-day public
comment period.
7. Consent Calendar
It was moved by Councilmember Klovstad , and seconded by Council Member Zabriskie,
to approve the Consent Calendar Items as follows:
7.1 Approve the minutes from August 9, 2022, Closed Session and Regular meetings.
7.2 Adopt Resolution 2022-47 to amend the Town of Truckee Local Road Safety Plan to
include a vision for zero roadway fatalities and serious injuries.
7.3 Authorize the Public Works Director/Town Engineer to purchase a Larue D35 loader
mounted self-contained snow blower attachment from Snoquip Inc.
7.4 Appoint Molly Moore and Carole Sesko to fill the Youth Arts Representative and Public Art
Expert seats (respectively) for a term ending August 31, 2028.
7.5 Adopt Resolutions 2022-48, 2022-49, 2022-50, 2022-51 and 2022-52 requesting Highway
Safety Improvement Program (HSIP), Safe Streets and Roads for All, Railroad Crossing
Elimination, and Reconnecting Communities grant program funds for the Reimagine
Bridge Street Project.
7.6 Approve the attached Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) (with attachments) between
the Town of Truckee and the Truckee Police Officer’s Association (TPOA) for the period
July 1, 2022 to June 30, 2024; 2) Authorize a budget amendment to the General Fund in the
amount of $221,000 to cover the additional personnel expenses incurred under this MOU;
and 3) Approve resolution 2022-54 adopting the updated Town of Truckee Job
Classification list, with additional position classifications, retroactively effective to July 1,
2022 pursuant to the requirements of the California Code of Regulations, Title 2, Section
570.5.
The Consent Calendar carried with the following vote:
Ayes: Councilmember Klovstad, Council Member Zabriskie, Vice Mayor Romack,
and Mayor Henderson.
Noes: None.
Absent: Council Member Polivy.
Abstained: None.
The motion passed 4-0.
8. Council Reports
Vice Mayor Romack
Attended the Nevada County Board of Supervisors welcome reception.
Attended the Martis Valley Trail grand opening.
Attended the Tahoe Summit.
Page 9
Item 6.1
Joint Town Council Planning Commission MeetingAugust 23, 2022 Page 6 of 6
Council Member Klovstad
Attended the Nevada County Board of Supervisors welcome meeting.
Attended a KidZone Advisory Committee meeting.
Participated in multiple discussions with community members regarding the General Plan and
EIR.
Council Member Zabriskie
Attended the Chief’s Advisory Committee meeting.
Attended the Nevada County Board of Supervisors welcome meeting.
Mayor Henderson
Participated in a webinar on 24/7 carbon data.
Attended the American Council for and Energy Efficient Economy conference.
9. Adjournment – at 9:28 p.m.
Respectfully submitted by: Approved:
Sarah Ring, Administrative Technician, on
behalf of Judy Price, MMC, Town Clerk
Courtney Henderson, Mayor
Page 10
Item 6.1
Date: September 27, 2022
Honorable Mayor and Council Members:
From: Jen Callaway, Town Manager
Title: Consider Resolution 2022-61 opposing ballot Measure V, a ½ percent general sales tax
increase
Approved By: Jen Callaway, Town Manager
Recommended Action: Consider Resolution 2022-61 opposing ballot Measure V, a ½ percent
general sales tax increase.
Discussion:
The Nevada County Board of Supervisors has placed a countywide tax measure on the November 8,
2022, general election ballot. The measure is known as Measure V and titled the “Nevada County
Wildfire Prevention, Emergency Services and Disaster Readiness Sales and Use Tax”. Measure V
would increase the sales tax rate countywide by ½ cent for a period of 10 years, generating an
estimated $12 million annually. The County has proposed Measure V as a general tax, meaning that
the revenue generated by the tax can be used for any legal purpose.
As per Council direction on September 13, 2022, resolution 2022-61, opposing Measure V is attached
for Council consideration.
Priority:
Enhanced Communication Climate and Greenhouse Gas Reduction Housing
Infrastructure Investment x Emergency and Wildfire Preparedness Core Service
Fiscal Impact:
Town staff and County staff have negotiated a memorandum of understanding (MOU), which at the
time of publication of this report was being routed for signature. The MOU allocates a portion of the
Measure V revenue directly to the Town and would require the County to spend an additional share of
the revenue on projects directly benefiting the eastern portion of the County, defined as all areas east
of the I-80/Hwy 20 junction. Assuming that Measure V passes, this MOU is estimated to bring the
Town $1 million annually for 10 years to be spent for the purposes in the MOU.
Public Communication: Agenda Posting
Attachments:
1. Resolution 2022-61 A Resolution of the Town Council of the Town of Truckee Opposing
Measure V: Nevada County Wildfire Prevention, Emergency Services and Disaster Readiness
Sales and Use Tax.
Page 11
Item 6.2
TOWN OF TRUCKEE
California
RESOLUTION 2022-61
A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TRUCKEE OPPOSING
MEASURE V: NEVADA COUNTY WILDFIRE PREVENTION, EMERGENCY SERVICES AND
DISASTER READINESS SALES AND USE TAX
WHEREAS: the Nevada County Board of Supervisors has placed a sales tax measure,
known as Measure V, on the November 8, 2022, general election ballot; and
WHEREAS: Measure V ballot measure is a ½ percent sales tax increase; and
WHEREAS: Measure V ballot measure would last for ten years; and
WHEREAS: Measure V is a general sales tax measure, requiring 50 percent plus 1
voter approval to pass; and
WHEREAS: Measure V, as a general sales tax measure, is not legally restricted; and
WHEREAS: after deliberation and discussion the Town Council has decided to take a
position with regard to Measure V which will appear on the November 8, 2022, general election
ballot; and
******
NOW THEREFORE, THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TRUCKEE finds
a resolves that:
1. Measure V is a general sales tax and thereby requires fifty percent plus one approval of
local voters for passage.
2. Measure V would use the majority portion of the Town’s taxing capacity with respect to
Sales tax caps.
3. Measure V is not legally restricted to stated purposes.
4. Measure V would automatically expire after ten years and cannot be renewed without
voter approval.
In recognition of the foregoing findings, the Town Council hereby expresses its opposition for the
passage of Measure V, authorizes its members to oppose the passage of this measure in the
community and encourages the voters of Truckee to inform themselves fully before casting their
ballot.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Page 12
Item 6.2
________________________________
Courtney Henderson, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Judy Price, MMC, Town Clerk
Page 13
Item 6.2
Date: September 27, 2022
Honorable Mayor and Council Members:
Author and title: Becky Bucar, Engineering Manager
Title: Reconnecting Communities Grant Application for Downtown Truckee Railroad
Pedestrian Crossing Plan
Approved By: Jen Callaway, Town Manager
Recommended Action: Council adopt Resolution 2022-59 requesting Reconnecting Communities
planning grant program funds for the Downtown Truckee Railroad Pedestrian Crossing feasibility
analysis and preliminary plans.
Discussion: The Downtown Railroad Pedestrian Crossing project (C2106) would design and construct
a pedestrian railroad undercrossing or overcrossing, connecting West River Street to Donner Pass Road
west of Spring Street. This pedestrian crossing was identified in the 1997 Downtown Truckee Specific
Plan and the 2015 Town of Truckee Trails and Bikeways Master Plan. The federally-funded Reconnecting
Communities grant program provides funding for projects that remove, retrofit, or mitigate transportation
facilities such as highways and rail lines that create barriers to community connectivity including mobility
of people and goods, access, and economic development. Town staff recommends that the Town apply
for the Reconnecting Communities funds for the development of a Downtown Railroad Pedestrian
Crossing project to conduct public outreach, prepare a feasibility analysis, and prepare preliminary plans.
In order to apply for the grant, staff is recommending that Council adopt the attached Resolution 2022-
59 (Attachment 1), requesting $560,000 in grant funds (80% of the total $700,000 cost). If awarded, the
Town would be required to provide a 20% match.
Priority:
Enhanced Communication X Climate and Greenhouse Gas Reduction Housing
X Infrastructure Investment Emergency and Wildfire Preparedness Core Service
Fiscal Impact: If funded, the grant requires a 20 percent match ($140,000). The Fiscal Year 2022/2023
Capital Improvement Project Plan has $1,250,000 of General Fund dollars earmarked for planning and
design work in fiscal years 2024/2025 through fiscal years 2026/2027.
Public Communication: None beyond this staff report.
Attachments:
Attachment 1: Resolution 2022-59, Reconnecting Communities Planning Grant Application
Page 14
Item 6.3
TOWN OF TRUCKEE
California
RESOLUTION 2022-59
A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TRUCKEE APPROVING THE
APPLICATION FOR THE U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RECONNECTING
COMMUNITIES PIOLET DISCRETIONARY GRANT PROGRAM TO DEVELOP THE
DOWNTOWN TRUCKEE RAILROAD PEDESTRIAN CROSSING PLAN
WHEREAS, The Town of Truckee is eligible to receive funding for the RCP through DOT;
and
WHEREAS, DOT is currently accepting project proposals through October 13, 2022; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Truckee is proposing to submit a planning grant application in
the amount of $560,000 (80% of the $700,000 total cost) to develop the Downtown Truckee
Railroad Pedestrian Crossing Plan; and
WHEREAS, the grant program requires a 20 percent match of local funds for planning
grant activities ($140,000); and
WHEREAS, if selected for funding the Town of Truckee will enter into an agreement with
the U. S. Department of Transportation.
*****
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TRUCKEE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE
TOWN OF TRUCKEE AS FOLLOWS:
1. Authorize the filing of an application for the DOT Reconnecting Communities Piolet Grant
Program for the Downtown Truckee Railroad Pedestrian Crossing Plan.
2. Authorize the Town Manager, or designee, to execute and submit documents including
applications, grant agreements and any amendments thereto; reports and
reimbursements with the U. S. Department of Transportation.
3. Commit the required 20 percent match ($140,000).
The foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member _____________, seconded
by Council Member _____________________, at a regular meeting of the Town of Truckee
Town Council, held on the 27th day of September 2022 and adopted by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
_________________________________
Courtney Henderson, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________________
Judy Price, MMC, Town Clerk
Attachment 1
Page 15
Item 6.3
Date: September 27, 2022
Honorable Mayor and Council Members:
Author and title: Christy Lyle, Planning Technician
Title: Easement Abandonment, 14865 and 14879 Northwoods Blvd. (APNs 044-240-013 and 044-
240-012); Owners: Dennis and Julia Startsev; Application 2022-00000005/ABN
Approved By: Jen Callaway, Town Manager
Recommended Action: (1) Adopt Resolution 2022-58 approving the abandonment of the public utility
easement along the shared (side) property line 14865 and 14879 Northwoods Blvd. (APNs 044-240-
013 and 044-240-012); Lots 302 and 301 of the Tahoe Donner Unit 4); and (2) Authorize the Town
Manager to sign the Indemnification Agreement between the Town of Truckee and Dennis and Julia
Startsev regarding APNs 044-240-013 and 044-240-012.
Discussion: The properties are located on Northwoods Boulevard in the Tahoe Donner Subdivision and
were recorded in 1974 (see Attachment #3). As part of the Tahoe Donner Subdivision, all lots were
recorded with public utility easements for water, gas, sewer, natural gas and/or conduits for electric,
telephone and television service, together with all appurtenances thereto, on, over, under, and across
those certain strips of land lying five feet on each side of all side lot lines and on, over, and 10-feet
adjacent to all road right of ways.
The applicants, Dennis and Julia Startsev, have submitted an Easement Abandonment application to
abandon two five-foot public utility easements along the shared (side) property line as defined by the
southern 5.00 feet of Lot 302 and the northern 5.00 feet of Lot 301. The applicant is requesting the
abandonment in order to finalize a Lot Line Adjustment being processed concurrently to merge the two
parcels.
Any and all public utility agencies and special districts with an interest in this easement abandonment
application have been notified and have either abandoned their respective interests or authorized the
Town to do so.
The indemnity and hold harmless agreement (Exhibit C) is required to ensure that the Town would not
be held liable for any claims that result from the easement abandonment, including any claims or suits
arising from any alleged ownership or other interests.
Pursuant to Development Code Section 18.88.030.B (Minor Public Service Easement Vacation), a
request for the vacation of a public service easement may be approved, with or without conditions by the
Town Council, if any one of the following findings can be made:
1. The easement has not been used for the purpose for which it was dedicated or acquired for five
consecutive years immediately preceding the requested vacation, and the easement is not
necessary for present or prospective public use;
2. The date of dedication or acquisition of the easement is less than five years, and more than one
Page 16
Item 6.4
year, immediately preceding the requested vacation, the easement was not used continuously
since that date, and the easement is not necessary for present or prospective public use; or
3. The easement has been superseded by relocation, there are no other public facilities located
within the easement, and the easement is not necessary for present or prospective public use.
Staff recommends approval of the proposed public utility easement abandonment based on Finding #1.
The easement has not been used for the purpose for which it was dedicated for five consecutive years
immediately preceding the requested vacation. All public utility agencies and special districts with an
interest in this easement have been notified, and all have taken action to abandon their interest in the
easement or have provided authorization for the Town to abandon the interest on their behalf.
Priority:
Enhanced Communication Climate and Greenhouse Gas Reduction Housing
Infrastructure Investment Emergency and Wildfire Preparedness X Core Service
Fiscal Impact: No fiscal impacts will be borne by the Town for the approval of the indemnification
agreement or easement abandonment. All staff review hours are covered by the application fees, which
are paid by the applicant.
Public Communication: All public utility agencies and special districts that have an interest in the
easement were notified of the requested easement abandonment.
Attachments:
1. Draft Resolution 2022-58
Exhibit A: Exhibit and Legal Description
Exhibit B: Findings
Exhibit C: Indemnity, Hold Harmless, and Defense Agreement
2. Vicinity Map
3. Tahoe Donner Unit 4 Subdivision Map (relevant pages only)
Page 17
Item 6.4
Town of Truckee
California
RESOLUTION 2022-58
A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TRUCKEE
ABANDONING TWO FIVE-FOOT PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS ALONG THE
SHARED PROPERTY LINE BETWEEN 14865 AND 14879 NORTHWOODS BLVD;
ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBERS 044-240-013-000 AND 044-240-012-000
(OWNERS: DENNIS AND JULIA STARTSEV)
WHEREAS, the Town of Truckee has received an Easement Abandonment application from
Dennis and Julia Startsev to abandon the two, five-foot public utility easements along the shared
(side) property line to allow for a Lot Line Adjustment to merge the two parcels, located at 14865
and 14879 Northwoods Boulevard (APNs 044-240-013 and 044-240-012); or Lots 302 and 301 of
the Tahoe Donner Unit 4 Subdivision Map, Book 4, Page 27 in the Recorder’s Office of Nevada
County, California; and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Director and Town Engineer/Public Works
Director have reviewed the proposed abandonment of the public utility easements (five-feet wide on
each side of the shared lot line) between 14865 and 14879 Northwoods Boulevard and find there is
not a public interest in the easement in question, the easements have not been used for the
purpose for which they were dedicated or acquired for five consecutive years immediately
preceding the requested vacation, and the easements are not necessary for present or prospective
use; and
WHEREAS, public utilities and special districts providing utility services have been notified
of the requested abandonment and have either abandoned their respective interests or authorized
the Town to do so; and
WHEREAS, there are no in-place public utility facilities located in public utility easement to
be abandoned that are in use or would be affected by the abandonment and the Town has not
received any objections to the proposed overhead wire and conduit easement abandonment from
any public utility or special district; and
WHEREAS, environmental review has been conducted in accordance with the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the Town Council has determined the project will not have a
significant impact on the environment and is exempt from environmental review in accordance with
Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF
TRUCKEE that upon satisfaction of all conditions set forth below, the Town shall abandon any and
all interest in the following: i) The 10-foot-(five-feet wide on each side of the shared lot line) of a
public utility easement located along the shared property boundary, as shown within Exhibit A,
located at 14865 and 14879 Northwoods Boulevard (APNs 044-240-013 and 044-240-012); or Lots
302 and 301 of the Tahoe Donner Unit 4 Subdivision Map, Book 4, Page 27 in the Recorder’s Office
of Nevada County, California; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TRUCKEE
that the abandonment of the public utility easement contemplated herein is subject to the following
conditions being met by the applicant:
Attachment #1
Startsev Easement Abandonment
Planning Application 2022-00000005/ABN
Draft Resolution 2022-58
Page 18
Item 6.4
Council Resolution 2022-58
Page 2
1. A plat map shall be prepared by a licensed land surveyor and shall be reviewed and
approved by the Town Engineer. The plat map shall show the 10-foot-wide public
utility easement to be abandoned by the adoption of this resolution. The plat map
shall comply with all requirements of the Town Engineer and Nevada County
Recorder and shall be integrated into this resolution as Exhibit A.
2. The applicants shall provide the Town with an executed copy of the Indemnity, Hold
Harmless and Defense Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit C.
3. Concurrent with recordation of this resolution for the public utility easement
abandonment, Community Development staff shall cause the requested lot line
adjustment to be recorded.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TRUCKEE
that if the conditions listed above for the Easement Abandonment have not been satisfied by
September 27, 2024, the conditional approval granted by this resolution shall become null and void
without further action by the Town Council being required.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Town Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to
coordinate the recordation of this resolution upon satisfying that the above-mentioned conditions
have been met.
The foregoing resolution was introduced by _____________, seconded by ______________,
at a regular meeting of the Truckee Town Council, held on the 27th day of September, 2022
and adopted by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
_________________________________
Courtney Henderson, Mayor
ATTEST:
__________________________
Judy Price, Town Clerk
Attachments:
Exhibit A – Exhibit and Legal Description
Exhibit B – Findings
Exhibit C – Indemnity, Hold Harmless and Defense Agreement
Page 19
Item 6.4
Council Resolution 2022-58
Page 3
COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2022-58
EXHIBIT "A"
APPLICATION NO. 2022-00000005/ABN
STARSEV EASEMENT ABANDONMENT
MINOR PUBLIC SERVICE EASEMENT VACATION
(see attached)
Page 20
Item 6.4
Council Resolution 2022-58
Page 4
COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2022-58
EXHIBIT "B"
APPLICATION NO. 2022-00000005/ABN
STARTSEV EASEMENT ABANDONMENT
MINOR PUBLIC SERVICE EASEMENT VACATION
FINDINGS
Minor Public Service Easement Vacation
1. The easement has not been used for the purpose for which it was dedicated or acquired for
five consecutive years immediately preceding the requested vacation, and the easement is
not necessary for present or prospective public use;
All public utility agencies and special districts with an interest in this easement have been
notified, and all have taken action to abandon their interest in the easement or have
provided authorization for the Town to abandon the interest on their behalf. The easements
have not been used for the purposed of over five consecutive years preceding the
requested vacation.
Page 21
Item 6.4
Council Resolution 2022-58
Page 5
COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2022-58
EXHIBIT "C"
APPLICATION NO. 2022-00000005/ABN
STARTSEV EASEMENT ABANDONMENT
INDEMNITY, HOLD HARMLESS AND DEFENSE AGREEMENT
Page 22
Item 6.4
AƩachment B: Vicinity Map
14865 Northwoods Blvd
14879 Northwoods Blvd
Page 23
Item 6.4
Page 24
Item 6.4
Page 25
Item 6.4
Page 26
Item 6.4
Date: September 27, 2022
Honorable Mayor and Council Members:
Alfred Knotts, Transit Program Manager
Title: Adoption of 2022 – 2025 Title VI Compliance Plan – Policies and Procedures to Ensure
Protection and Non-Discrimination of Transit Riders Under the Civil Rights Act of 1964
Approved By: Jen Callaway, Town Manager
Recommended Action:
Town Council approve Resolution 2022-60 adopting the “Town of Truckee 2022 - 2025 Truckee Tahoe
Area Regional Transit (TART) Title VI Compliance Plan” (Plan) and authorizing the Town Manager to
sign the Plan and implement the associated policies and procedures.
Discussion:
As a recipient of Federal Transit Administration funds, directly or indirectly, the Town is required to comply
with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is the
main legal authority for the Office of Equal Opportunity, External Civil Rights nondiscrimination programs.
Title VI ensures that no person is excluded from participation in, or denied the benefits of, or be subject
to discrimination in receipt services or programs that receive federal funds on the basis of race, color,
national origin, or any other characteristic protected by law.
Once an agency accepts federal funds, all of its programs and activities are covered, regardless of
receiving other non-federal funding sources to support transit operations. Once approved by the Town
Council, FTA requires the Title VI Plan be submitted to Caltrans and FTA every three years. The Town
Transit Team has prepared an update to the 2018 Title VI program policy document which is included as
Attachment B. The program policy document describes the Federal requirements under Title VI and
identifies the Town’s procedures for carrying out those requirements. Once approved, this Plan will be
submitted to Caltrans and updated on the Town website
https://www.townoftruckee.com/government/engineering-and-public-works/public-transportation/title-vi-
non-discrimination-documents, and will remain valid through 2025.
This Plan will not only be formally reviewed by the Town’s Transit Contractor, but the internal Transit
Team will also provide the Plan to the Town’s recently hired Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Program
Manager (DEI PM) for reference and as to familiarize the DEI PM with not only federal requirements but
to enhance communication and engagement with underrepresented and vulnerable populations.
Priority:
X Enhanced Communication Climate and Greenhouse Gas Reduction Housing
Infrastructure Investment Emergency and Wildfire Preparedness X Core Service
Page 27
Item 6.5
Fiscal Impact:
Staff resources required to update the Title VI Plan are included in the FY 22/23 Transit Budget. As
outlined in the Plan, some written documents may be translated to Spanish for which a nominal charge
may occur by an outside translation agency. A budget for such translation services is included in the
Inclusion and Community Engagement division.
Public Communication: Nothing outside this Staff Report and associated agenda posting
Attachments:
Attachment A - Resolution 2022-60
Attachment B – “Town of Truckee 2022 - 2025 Truckee Tahoe Area Regional Transit (TART) Title VI
Compliance Plan”
Page 28
Item 6.5
ATTACHMENT A
Page 29
Item 6.5
TOWN OF TRUCKEE
California
RESOLUTION 2022-60
A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TRUCKEE
AUTHORIZING THE ADOPTION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE 2022 – 2025 TITLE VI
TRUCKEE TART COMPLIANCE PLAN
WHEREAS, the Town of Truckee is a recipient of Federal Transit Administration financial
assistance to operate Truckee Transit programs, activities and services; and
WHEREAS, the U.S. Department of Transportation provides guidelines to comply with
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for Federal T ransit Administration recipients and sub
recipients; and
WHEREAS, the U.S. Department of Transportation has developed Title VI provisions as
outlined in FTA Circular 4702.1B, Title VI Requirements and Guidelines for Federal Transit
Administration Recipients; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Truckee Town Council wishes to adopt and subsequently
implement the Title VI Compliance Plan developed and updated by Town of Truckee staff.
* * * * * *
NOW, THEREFORE, THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TRUCKEE DOES
RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
1. That the Town Manager is authorized to sign the 2022 – 2025 Title VI Compliance Plan.
2. That the Town Manager is authorized to implement policies and procedures necessary to
comply with Title VI of Civil Rights Act, and any subsequent amendments
The foregoing Resolution was introduced by _____________, seconded by
______________, at a Regular Meeting of the Truckee Town Council, held on the 27th day
of September 2022, and adopted by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
________________________________
Courtney Henderson, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Judy Price, MMC, Town Clerk
Page 30
Item 6.5
ATTACHMENT B
Page 31
Item 6.5
Tahoe Truckee Area Regional Transit (TART)
Title VI Compliance Plan
Updated and adopted by Truckee Town Council September 27, 2022
Town of Truckee
10183 Truckee Airport Road
Truckee, CA 96161
(530) 582-7700
Page 32
Item 6.5
Town of Truckee TART Title VI Compliance Plan Page 2 of 24
Title VI Compliance
The Town of Truckee is committed to ensuring that no person is excluded from participation in,
or denied the benefits of, or be subject to discrimination in receipt of its services or programs on
the basis of race, color, national origin, or any other characteristic protected by law, including
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. Further, under the Americans with Disabilities
Act (ADA) of 1990, no entity shall discrimination against an individual with a physical or mental
disability in connection with the provision of transportation services.
The Town’s primary goal is to ensure all management, staff, contractors, local agencies, and
service beneficiaries are aware of the provisions of, and responsibilities derived from Title VI of
the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Circular 4702.1B of 2012.
The Town’s Title VI Plan serves to provide leadership, direction, and policy to ensure compliance
with Title VI, Environmental Justice, and Limited English Proficiency principles. This policy also
ensures that social impacts to communities and people are recognized and considered
throughout the transportation planning, and decision -making process.
This document was prepared by Town of Truckee (Town) and approved by the Truckee Town
Council to comply with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, including new provisions detailed
in U.S. Department of Transportation FTA Circular 4702.1B, Title VI Requirements and Guidelines
for Federal Transit Administration Recipients.
Town of Truckee is committed to ensuring that no person is excluded from participation in,
denied the benefits of, or otherwise subjected to discrimination under any of its Truckee Tahoe
Area Regional Transit (TART) programs, activities, or services on the basis of race, color or
national origin.
To obtain more information on the Town’s nondiscrimination obligations or to file a Title VI
complaint, contact the Public Works Director at (530) 582-7700 or visit the Town’s Title VI
webpage at https://www.townoftruckee.com/government/engineering-and-public-
works/public-transportation/title-vi-non-discrimination-documents.
Sincerely,
Jennifer Callaway
Town Manager
Town of Truckee
Page 33
Item 6.5
Town of Truckee TART Title VI Compliance Plan Page 3 of 24
Table of Contents
Section 1a. Title VI Notice to the Public (English) 4
Section 1b. Title VI Notice to the Public (Spanish) 5
Section 2. List of Locations Where Title VI Notice is Posted 6
Section 3a. Title VI Complaint Procedures (English) 7
Appeal Process and Filing a Complaint with the FTA 8
Title VI Complaint Form 10
Section 3b. Title VI Complaint Procedures (Spanish) 11
Appeal Process and Filing a Complaint with the FTA 12
Title VI Complaint Form 15
Section 4. Title VI Investigations, Complaints or Lawsuits 16
Section 5. Public Participation Plan 16
Section 6. Limited English Proficiency Plan 17
Introduction 17
Plan Summary 17
Four-Factor Analysis 17
Safe Harbor Provision 20
Providing Language Assistance Services by Language 20
Providing Notice to LEP Persons About the Availability of Language Assistance 21
Monitoring, Evaluating and Updating the Language Assistance Plan 21
Staff Training to Provide Timely and Reasonable Language Assistance
to LEP Population 21
Section 7. Racial Breakdown of Transit-Related Non-Elected Planning Boards,
Advisory Councils or Committees 22
Section 8. Title VI Equity Analysis of Constructed Facilities 22
Section 9. Board Resolution or Similar Approving the Title VI Plan 22
Section 10. Title VI Program Requirements for Fixed Route Transit Providers 22
Requirement to Set Systemwide Service Standard 22
Requirement to Set Service Policies 23
Attachment 1 – Resolution No. 2022-60 24
Page 34
Item 6.5
Town of Truckee TART Title VI Compliance Plan Page 4 of 24
Section 1a. Title VI Notice to the Public (English)
PUBLIC NOTICE
Notifying the Public of Rights Under Title VI
Town of Truckee TART operates its programs, activities, and services without regard to race, color
or national origin in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Any person who believes he or she has been aggrieved by any unlawful discriminatory practice
under Title VI while using Truckee TART services may file a complaint with the Town of Truckee.
For more information on Town of Truckee’s civil rights program and the procedures to file a
complaint, contact the Town Clerk’s office at (530) 582-7700. Information is also on the Town of
Truckee website www.townoftruckee.com, or visit the Town of Truckee administrative office at
10183 Truckee Airport Road, Truckee, CA 96161.
A complainant may file a complaint directly with the Federal Transit Administration by filing a
complaint with the Office of Civil Rights, Attention: Title VI Program Coordinator , East Building,
5th Floor-TCR, 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE., Washington D.C. 20590.
If information is needed in another language, contact (530) 582-7700 for assistance.
Si require informacion en otro idioma, llame a (530) 582-7700.
Page 35
Item 6.5
Town of Truckee TART Title VI Compliance Plan Page 5 of 24
Section 1b. Title VI Notice to the Public (Spanish)
AVISO PUBLICO
Notificación al público de los derechos bajo el título VI
El TART de Town of Truckee operara sus programas, actividades y servicios, sin distinción de raza,
color u origen nacional, de conformidad con el Título VI del acta de derechos civiles de 1964.
Cualquier persona que crea que ha sido agraviada por cualquier práctica discriminatoria ilegal
bajo el Título VI durante el uso de los servicios de TART de Truckee puede presentar una denuncia
con Town of Truckee.
Para obtener más información sobre el programa de derechos civiles de Town of Truckee y los
procedimientos para presentar una denuncia, comuníquese con la secretaria de la cuidad de
Truckee al (530) 582-7700. La información también esta en el sitio web de Town of Truckee
www.townoftruckee.com, o visite la oficina administrativa de Town of Truckee en 10183 Truckee
Airport Road, Truckee, CA 96161.
Un demandante puede presentar una denuncia directamente con la Administración Federal de
Tránsito (FTA) al presentar la denuncia ante la Oficina de Derechos Civiles, Atención:..
Coordinador del Programa del Título VI, East Building, 5th Floor-TCR, 1200 New Jersey Ave., NW,
Washington DC 20590 .
Si se necesita información en otro idioma, llame a (530) 582-7700 para obtener ayuda.
Page 36
Item 6.5
Town of Truckee TART Title VI Compliance Plan Page 6 of 24
Section 2. List of Locations Where Title VI Notice Is Posted
Town of Truckee TART Title VI Notice to the Public (both English and Spanish) is posted at the
following locations:
Town of Truckee Administrative Office
10183 Truckee Airport Road
Truckee, CA 96161
Paratransit Services (Transit Contractor)
10969 Stevens Lane
Truckee, CA 96161
Truckee Transit Shelters
Henness Flat Apartments
Martis Roundabout
Regional Park
Gateway Center
Grocery Outlet
Crossroads Center
Mousehole
West End Donner Lake
Soaring Ranch
Estates Drive
Coldstream
Truckee TART Vehicle Fleet
Truckee TART Schedules
Town of Truckee Website: www.townoftruckee.com
Page 37
Item 6.5
Town of Truckee TART Title VI Compliance Plan Page 7 of 24
Section 3a. Title VI Complaint Procedures (English)
Any person who believes that he or she has been subjected to discrimination on the basis of race,
color or national origin with respect to Truckee TART programs, activities, services, or other
transit related benefits, may file a written complaint with Town of Truckee. A complaint may be
filed by the individual or by a representative. A complaint must be filed within 180 days after the
date of the alleged discrimination, but complainants are encouraged to submit complaints as
soon as possible. Town of Truckee will promptly investigate all complaints filed under Title VI
pursuant to this Regulation.
Complaint must include the following information:
a) A complaint must be in writing and signed and dated by the complainant or his/her
representative before any action can be taken.
b) A complaint shall state, as fully as possible, the facts and circumstances surrounding the
alleged discrimination, including the name and address of the complainant, the date, time
and location of the incident. The complaint shall include a description of the program, activity
or service on which the alleged discrimination occurred.
A Complaint Form can be used to file a Title VI complaint with Town of Truckee. A Complaint
Form will be made in an accessible format upon request. A Complaint Form can be obtained at:
a) Town of Truckee website www.townoftruckee.com.
b) By calling Town of Truckee Clerk’s office at (530) 582-7700 a Complaint Form can be mailed.
c) By picking up a Complaint Form from the Clerk’s office at Town of Truckee administrative
office located at 10183 Truckee Airport Road, Truckee, CA 96161.
If the complaint is received by anyone at Town of Truckee other than the Clerk’s office, the
individual in receipt of the complaint shall forward it to the Clerk’s office or designee as soon as
practicable but no later than two (2) business days from the date of receipt. The Clerk’s office
shall immediately provide a copy of the complaint to the Town Attorney and the Public Works
Director regarding the Truckee TART program, activity or service that is identified as being out of
compliance.
The Public Works Director or designee shall promptly investigate the alleged complaint and shall
prepare a written response as soon as practicable, but no later than ten (10) business days of
receipt of the complaint. The Public Works Director or designee may consult with appropriate
staff in the preparation of a response to the complaint.
The Public Works Director or designee shall make efforts to speak (meeting or telephone
conversation) with the complainant, at which time the complainant may give written or oral
evidence supporting the allegation that his/her rights under Title VI have been violated. The
Town Attorney shall review and consider the response prepared by the Public Works Director or
Page 38
Item 6.5
Town of Truckee TART Title VI Compliance Plan Page 8 of 24
designee, all the information provided by the complainant, if any, and any other evidence
available regarding the allegations of the complaint. The Town Attorney shall prepare a written
report of the findings, and if corrective action is required, a timetable for the completion of such
action.
As soon as it is practicable, but no later than twenty (20) business days following receipt of the
initial complaint, the Public Works Director or designee shall inform the complainant of the
findings and any corrective action to be taken as a result of the complaint together with the
timetable for completion of such action.
Any timeline set forth herein may be extended by the Public Works Director upon a showing of
good cause.
Appeal Process and Filing a Complaint with the FTA
If the complainant is not satisfied with the findings and/or action of Town of Truckee then
the complainant may file his/her complaint with the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Office
of Civil Rights.
Any person who believes that he/she or as a member of any specific class of individuals, has been
subjected to discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin with respect to Truckee
TART programs, activities, or services, or other transit related benefits, may file a written
complaint with the FTA. A complaint may be filed by the individual or by a representative. A
complaint must be filed within 180 days after the date of the alleged discrimination. FTA will
promptly investigate all complaints filed under Title VI in accordance with Department of
Transportation (DOT) regulations 49 CFR 21.11(b) and 21.11 (c).
A complaint filed with the FTA must include the following information:
A complaint must be in writing and signed and dated by the complainant or his/her
representative before any action can be taken. In cases where a complainant is unable or
incapable of providing a written statement, but wishes FTA or DOT to investigate alleged
discrimination, a verbal complaint of discrimination may be made t o the FTA Director,
Office of Civil Rights. If necessary, the Civil Rights Official will assist the person in
converting the verbal complaint into writing. All complaints must, however, be signed by
the complainant or his/her representative.
A complaint shall state, as fully as possible, the facts and circumstances surrounding the
alleged discrimination, including the date, time and location of the incident. The
complaint shall include a description of the program, activity or service on which the
alleged discrimination occurred.
Page 39
Item 6.5
Town of Truckee TART Title VI Compliance Plan Page 9 of 24
FTA Civil Rights Office Address: Federal Transit Administration Office of Civil Rights
Attn: Title VI Program Coordinator
East Building, 5th Floor – TCR
1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, DC 20590
TTY: 1-800-877-8339; Voice: 1-866-377-8642
Once a complaint has been accepted, FTA will notify Town of Truckee that it has been subject to
a Title VI complaint and ask Town of Truckee to respond in writing to the complainant’s
allegations. Once the complainant agrees to release the complaint to Town of Truckee, FTA will
provide Town of Truckee with the complaint. FTA may choose to close a complaint if the
complainant does not agree to release the complaint to Town of Truckee. FTA strives to complete
a Title VI complaint investigation within 180 days of the acceptance date of a complaint.
FTA will make a prompt investigation whenever a compliance review, report, complaint or any
other information indicates a possible failure to comply with Title VI Regulat ions. FTA’s
investigation will include a review of the pertinent practices and policies of Town of Truckee, the
circumstances under which the possible noncompliance occurred, and other factors relevant to
a determination as to whether Town of Truckee has f ailed to comply with Title VI regulations.
Following the investigation, FTA Office of Civil Rights will transmit to the complainant and Town
of Truckee one of the following three letters based on its finding:
Letter of Resolution - Explains the steps that Town of Truckee has taken or promises to
take to come into compliance with Title VI.
Letter of Finding (Compliance) - Explains that Town of Truckee is found to be in
compliance with Title VI. This letter will include an explanation of why Town of Tr uckee
was found to be in compliance, and provide notification of the complainant’s appeal
rights.
Letter of Finding (Noncompliance) - Explains that Town of Truckee is found to be in
noncompliance. This letter will include each violation referenced, the applicable
regulations, a brief description of proposed remedies, notice of the time limit on the
conciliation process, the consequences for failure to achieve voluntary compliance, and
an offer of assistance to Town of Truckee in devising a remedial plan fo r compliance.
The letters of finding and resolution will offer the complainant and Town of Truckee the
opportunity to provide additional information that would lead FTA to reconsider its conclusions.
FTA requests that the parties in the complaint provide this additional information within 60 days
of the date of the FTA letter of finding. FTA Office of Civil Rights will respond to an appeal either
by issuing a revised letter of resolution or finding to the appealing party, or by informing the
appealing party that the original letter of resolution or finding remains in force.
Page 40
Item 6.5
Town of Truckee TART Title VI Compliance Plan Page 10 of 24
Town of Truckee – Truckee TART
Title VI Complaint Form
10183 Truckee Airport Road, Truckee, CA 96161; (530) 582-7700
Complainant’s Name:
Street Address:
City/State/Zip:
Telephone: Alternate Phone:
E-Mail Address:
Date of Violation: Time of Violation:
Place of Violation:
Bus Number: Bus Service (Fixed Route or Dial-A-Ride):
I feel the discrimination I experienced was based on: □ Race □ Color □ National Origin
Please provide the name(s) of the Truckee TART employee(s) who allegedly discriminated
against you, if known.
Identify what Truckee TART program, activity, or service you were using at the time you were
allegedly discriminated against.
Identify individuals by name, address and phone number that has information relating to the
alleged violation.
Explain what happened and why you feel you were discriminated against. Please include how
other individuals were treated differently from you. Use the back of this form if you need more
space.
Signature of Complainant: Date:
Page 41
Item 6.5
Town of Truckee TART Title VI Compliance Plan Page 11 of 24
Section 3b. Title VI Complaint Procedures (Spanish)
Sección 3b. Procedimientos de denuncias del Título VI
Cualquier persona que cree que él o ella ha sido víctima de discriminación por motivos de raza,
color u origen nacional en lo que respecta a los programas TART de Truckee, actividades,
servicios, u otros beneficios relacionados con tránsito, puede presentar una denuncia por escrito
a Town of Truckee. Una denuncia puede ser presentada por el individuo o por un representante.
Una denuncia se debe presentar dentro de los 180 días después de la fecha de la supuesta
discriminación, pero se anima a los denunciantes a presentar denuncias a la posible brevedad.
Town of Truckee investigará inmediatamente todas las denuncias presentadas en virtud del
Título VI de conformidad con el presente reglamento.
La denuncia debe incluir la siguiente información:
a) Una denuncia debe ser por escrito y firmado y fechado por el autor o su representante antes
de tomar cualquier acción.
b) Una denuncia deberá declarar información completa de los hechos y las circunstancias que
rodearon la supuesta discriminación, incluyendo el nombre y la dirección del demandante, la
fecha, hora y lugar del incidente. La denuncia deberá incluir una descripción del programa,
actividad o servicio en el que ocurrió la supuesta discriminación.
Un formulario de denuncias puede ser utilizado para presentar una denuncia del Título VI con
Town of Truckee. El formulario se hará disponible en un formato accesible a petición. Un
formulario de denuncias se puede obtener en:
a) Sitio web de Town of Truckee www.townoftruckee.com.
b) Al llamar a la oficina del secretario de Truckee (530) 582 -7700 un formulario de denuncias
puede ser enviado por correo.
c) Al recoger un formulario de reclamación en la oficina administrativa de Town of Truckee
ubicada en Truckee 10183 Truckee Airport Road, Truckee, CA 96161.
Si la denuncia es admitida por una persona de Town of Truckee que no pertenece a la oficina del
secretario, esta misma reenviara el documento a la oficina del secretario o la persona designada,
lo antes posible pero no más tarde de dos (2) días desde la fecha de recibo. La oficina del
secretario proporcionara inmediatamente una copia de la denuncia ante el abogado de la ciudad
de Truckee y el director de Public Works , con respecto al programa TART de Truckee, actividad
o servicio que se identificaron ser fuera de cumplimiento.
El director de Public Works, o la persona designada, investigaran rápidamente la supuesta
denuncia y preparará una respuesta por escrito tan pronto como sea posible, pero no más tarde
de diez (10) días siguiendo el recibo de la denuncia. Si es necesario el director de Public Works ,
Page 42
Item 6.5
Town of Truckee TART Title VI Compliance Plan Page 12 of 24
o la persona designada, consultara con la persona apropiada en la preparación de una respuesta
a la denuncia.
El director de Public Works , o la persona designada, harán esfuerzos para hablar (reunión o
conversación telefónica) con el demandante, en cual momento el demandante puede dar
testimonio escrito u oral para apoyar la afirmación de que sus derechos en virtud del Título VI
han sido violados. El abogado de la ciudad de Truckee deberá revisar y considerar la respuesta
preparada por el director de Public Works, o la persona designada, toda la información
proporcionada por el demandante, si lo hubiere, y cualquier otra evidencia disponible con
respecto a las alegaciones de la demanda. El abogado de la ciudad Truckee elaborará un informe
escrito de los resultados, y si se requiere una acción correctiva, con un calendario de fechas para
la realización de dicha acción.
Tan pronto como sea posible, pero no más tarde de veinte (20) días siguiendo la fecha de recibo
de la denuncia inicial, el director de Public Works , o la persona designada, deberán informar al
denunciante de los resultados y las medidas correctivas que deben adoptarse como consecuencia
de la denuncia junto con el calendario para la realización de dicha acción.
Cualquier línea de tiempo establecida en este documento podrá ser prolongada por el director
de Public Works subdirector con causa justificada.
Apelar proceso y presentación de denuncias ante el FTA
Si el demandante no está satisfecho con los resultados y/o acciones de Town of Truckee entonces
el demandante puede presentar su reclamación ante la Administración Federal de Tránsito (FTA)
Oficina de Derechos Civiles.
Cualquier persona que cree que él/ella o como miembro de una clase específica de personas, ha
sido objeto de discriminación por motivos de raza, color u origen nacional en lo que respecta a
los programas TART de Truckee, actividades o servicios, u otros beneficios relacionados de
tránsito, puede presentar una denuncia por escrito ante el FTA. Una denuncia puede ser
presentada por el individuo o por un representante. Una denuncia se debe presentar dentro de
los 180 días después de la fecha de la supuesta discriminación. FTA investigará inmediatamente
todas las denuncias presentadas en virtud del Título VI de acuerdo con el Departamento de
Transporte (DOT) de los reglamentos 49 CFR 21.11 (b) y 21.11 (c).
Una denuncia presentada ante el FTA debe incluir la siguiente información:
La denuncia debe ser por escrito y firmado y fechado por el autor o su representante
antes de tomar cualquier acción. En los casos en que un demandante no puede o es
incapaz de proporcionar una declaración por escrito, pero desea que FTA o DOT
investigue la supuesta discriminación, una denuncia verbal de la discriminación puede ser
hecha al director de FTA, Oficina de Derechos Civiles. Si es necesario, el oficial de Derechos
Civiles puede asistir a la persona a convertir la denuncia verbal a escritura. Todas las
denuncias deben, sin embargo, ser firmadas por el demandante o su representante.
Page 43
Item 6.5
Town of Truckee TART Title VI Compliance Plan Page 13 of 24
Una denuncia deberá constar, en todo lo posible, los hechos y las circunstancias que
rodearon la supuesta discriminación, incluyendo la fecha, hora y lugar del incidente. La
denuncia deberá incluir una descripción del programa, actividad o servicio en el que
ocurrió la supuesta discriminación.
FTA Civil Rights Office Address: Federal Transit Administration Office of Civil Rights
Attn: Title VI Program Coordinator
East Building, 5th Floor – TCR
1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, DC 20590
TTY: 1-800-877-8339; Voice: 1-866-377-8642
Una vez que una denuncia ha sido aceptada, FTA notificará Town of Truckee que ha sido objeto
de una denuncia del Título VI y preguntara que Town of Truckee responda por escrito a las
alegaciones del demandante. Una vez que el demandante est é de acuerdo para liberar la
denuncia a Town of Truckee, FTA proporcionará a Town of Truckee con la denuncia. FTA puede
optar por cerrar una denuncia si el demandante no está de acuerdo para liberar la denuncia a
Town of Truckee. FTA se esfuerza por completar una investigación de denuncia del Título VI
dentro de los 180 días de la fecha de aceptación de una denuncia.
FTA hará una investigación inmediata siempre que una revisión de cumplimiento, informe,
denuncia o cualquier otra información indica un posib le incumplimiento de las regulaciones del
Título VI. La investigación de FTA incluirá una revisión de las prácticas y las políticas pertinentes
de Town of Truckee, las circunstancias en que se produjo la posible falta de cumplimiento, y otros
factores pertinentes a una determinación en cuanto a si Town of Truckee no ha cumplido con las
normas del Título VI.
Tras la investigación, FTA Oficina de Derechos Civiles transmitirá al demandante y a Town of
Truckee, basado en su descubrimiento, una de las tres cartas siguientes:
Carta de resolución - Explica los pasos que Town of Truckee haya adoptado o se
comprometen a tomar para entrar en cumplimiento con el Título VI
Carta de descubrimiento (Cumplimiento) - Explica que Town of Truckee se encuentra
estar en cumplimiento con el Título VI. Esta carta incluirá una explicación de por qué Town
of Truckee se encontró estar en cumplimiento, e informara de todos los derechos de
apelación del demandante.
Carta de descubrimiento (Incumplimiento) - Explica que Town of Truckee se encuentra
estar en incumplimiento. Esta carta incluirá cada violación que se hace referencia, la
normativa aplicable, una breve descripción de las propuestas soluciones, conocimiento
del límite de tiempo en el proceso de conciliación, las consecuencias en caso de no lograr
el cumplimiento voluntario, y asistencia a Town of Truckee con la preparación de un plan
correctivo para el cumplimiento.
Page 44
Item 6.5
Town of Truckee TART Title VI Compliance Plan Page 14 of 24
Las cartas de descubrimiento y resolución ofrecerán al demandante y a Town of Truckee la
oportunidad de someter información adicional que llevaría FTA a reconsiderar sus conclusiones.
FTA requiere que las personas en la demanda proporcionen información adicional dentro de
sesenta (60) días de la fecha de la carta de descubrimiento escrita por FTA. FTA Oficina de
Derechos Civiles responderá a una apelación, por manera de una carta revisada de la resolución
o descubrimiento de la parte apelante, o una carta informando a la parte apelante que la carta
original de la resolución o descubrimiento sigue vigente.
Page 45
Item 6.5
Town of Truckee TART Title VI Compliance Plan Page 15 of 24
Town of Truckee – Truckee TART
Formulario de denuncias del título VI
10183 Truckee Airport Road, Truckee, CA 96161; (530) 582-7700
Nombre del demandante:
Dirección: ____ ___
Ciudad/Estado/Código Postal:
Número de Teléfono: Teléfono alternativo:
Correo electrónico:
Fecha de violación: Tiempo de violación:
Lugar de violación:
Número del autobús: Servicio de autobús (Ruta fija o Dial-A-Ride):
Siento que la discriminación que pase fue basada en: □ Raza □ Color □ Origen Nacional
Por favor, indique el nombre(s) del empleado(s) de Truckee TART, que supuestamente
discrimino contra usted, si se conoce(n).
Identifique que programa, de Truckee TART, la actividad, o el servicio que estaba utilizando en
el momento que estaba supuestamente fue discriminado.
Identifique los individuales por nombre, dirección y número de teléfono que tienen información
sobre la presunta violación.
Explique lo que paso y por qué cree que fue discriminado. Por favor incluya la forma en que
otros individuos fueron tratados diferente que usted. Use el reverso de este formulario si
necesita más espacio.
_____________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Firma del demandante: Fecha:
Section 4: Title VI Investigations, Complaints or Lawsuits
Page 46
Item 6.5
Town of Truckee TART Title VI Compliance Plan Page 16 of 24
Truckee TART does not have any past, current or pending Title VI investigations, complaints or
lawsuits.
Section 5: Public Participation Plan
Town of Truckee carries out its Truckee TART programs, activities, and services in compliance
with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Town of Truckee, nor any of its employees, does not,
on the grounds of race, color or national origin, exclude any person from participating in, deny
the benefits of, or subject him/her to discrimination un der any Truckee TART program, service,
or activity.
Town of Truckee evaluates significant Truckee TART system-wide service and fare changes, and
proposed improvements at the planning and programming stages to determine whether these
changes have a discriminatory impact on the transit-dependent population and Limited English
Proficiency (LEP) individuals.
Town of Truckee promotes the full and fair participation of all affected populations in the
transportation decision-making process, and seeks out and considers the viewpoints of these
population groups in the course of conducting public outreach and involvement activities. Town
of Truckee’s public participation strategy offers early and continuous opportunities for the public
to be involved in the identification of social, economic and environmental impacts of proposed
transportation decisions.
Town of Truckee ensures that all individuals are afforded an opportunity to participate in the
public process when making significant changes to Truckee TART services through stakeholder
working groups, public workshops, public hearings, in writing, and one-one-one meetings.
Town of Truckee collaborates with other local agencies and organizations when conducting
outreach efforts on transit-related projects. Public outreach information is provided to the local
newspaper and radio station, through email blasts by local employers and the Chamber of
Commerce, through social media outlets, posted at locations frequented by the community
(library, post office, hospital, etc.), posted in buses, transit shelters, and at the transit center, on
the Town of Truckee website (www.townoftruckee.com), and at the Town of Truckee
administrative office located at 10183 Truckee Airport Road, Truckee, CA 96161.
The Town of Truckee partners with the Nevada County Transportation Commission on the annual
unmet transit needs process, and when preparing transit planning documents such as the Nevada
County Coordinated Public-Transit Human Services Transportation Plan and the Eastern Nevada
County Transit Development Plan updates. Public outreach information is provided in Spanish
and the Town works with organizations that provide services to LEP individuals along with
conducting other outreach efforts as described above.
Section 6: Limited English Proficiency Plan
Page 47
Item 6.5
Town of Truckee TART Title VI Compliance Plan Page 17 of 24
Introduction
This Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Plan has been prepared to address Town of Truckee
responsibilities as a recipient of federal financial assistance as they relate to the needs of
individuals with limited English language skills. This Plan has been prepared in accordance with
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and with the Federal Transit Administration Circular
4702.1B dated October 1, 2012, which states that no person shall be subjected to discrimination
on the basis of race, color or national origin.
Executive Order 13166, titled Improving Access to Services for Persons with Limited English
Proficiency, indicates that differing treatment based upon a person’s inability to speak, read,
write or understand English is a type of national origin discrimination. It di rects each federal
agency to publish guidance for its respective recipients clarifying their obligation to ensure that
such discrimination does not take place. This order applies to all state and local agencies that
receive federal funds.
Plan Summary
Town of Truckee is the public transit operator in Truckee, California on the Eastern Slope of
Nevada County and has developed this LEP Plan to help identify reasonable steps for providing
language assistance to persons with limited English proficiency who wish to access services
provided by Truckee TART. As defined in Executive Order 13166, LEP persons are those who do
not speak English as their primary language and have limited ability to read, speak, write, or
understand English.
This Plan outlines how to identify a person who may need language assistance, the ways in which
assistance may be provided, staff training that may be required, and how to notify LEP persons
that assistance is available.
To prepare this Plan, Town of Truckee applied the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) Four-
Factor Analysis. Below is a summary of the results.
Four-Factor Analysis
1. The number or proportion of LEP persons eligible to be served or likely to be encountered
by the Truckee TART program.
Town of Truckee staff reviewed the U.S. Census Bureau 2015-2019 American Community
Survey 5-Year Estimates Report and determined that 2,276 persons in Truckee (14.5% of the
population) speak a language other than English. In Truckee, 716 persons (4.6%) ind icate having
limited English proficiency, that is, they speak English “not very well.”
In Truckee, of those persons with limited English proficiency, 608 (3.9% of the total population)
speak Spanish; the remaining 108 respondents speak approximately 6 different languages, each
accounting for less than 0.7% of the population. The table below identifies the number of
Spanish speaking LEP individuals by Census Tract in Truckee.
Page 48
Item 6.5
Town of Truckee TART Title VI Compliance Plan Page 18 of 24
Source: https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table?g=1600000US0680588&tid=ACSDP5Y2020.DP02;
accessed on 9/19/2022
Spanish Speaking LEP Individuals
by Census Tract
Census
Tract
Truckee Neighborhoods
LEP
Persons
% of Tract
Population
12.03 Tahoe Donner Eastern 0 0.0%
12.04
Tahoe Donner Western/Donner
Lake 18 0.8%
12.05 Glenshire 25 0.5%
12.06
Gateway, Prosser Lakeview,
Ponderosa Palisades, Downtown 372 5.9%
415 7.2%
Truckee TART provides fixed route (1 route) and demand response (dial-a-ride) services. The
fixed route provides service within Census Tracts 12.04 and 12.06. The dial-a-ride provides door
to door service in all four Census Tract areas.
LEP individuals generally make contact with Truckee TART services by telephone, direct contact
with the bus drivers, or in-person at the Town of Truckee administrative office. During these
points of contact, efforts are made to determine the literacy skills of the LEP individual in their
own language when a request is made to provide information in a language other than English .
Town of Truckee collaborates with organizations that serve LEP clients to determine if LEP
individuals are underserved by Truckee TART programs due to language barriers.
2. The frequency with which LEP persons come in contact with Truckee TART programs.
Town of Truckee surveyed the Truckee TART contractor dispatch and driver staff (a total of 6
persons). The following table reflects the questions that were asked along with the collective
responses. As shown, dispatchers and drivers were able to successfully communicate with and
provide information to LEP individuals.
Town of Truckee ensures that LEP individuals have access to Truckee TART programs, activities,
and services, and promotes the full and fair participation of LEP individuals in the transportation
decision-making process. Town of Truckee works with key organizations that serve LEP
Page 49
Item 6.5
Town of Truckee TART Title VI Compliance Plan Page 19 of 24
individuals when conducting outreach efforts related to Truckee TART programs, activities and
services.
3. The nature and importance of program, activity or service provided by the Truckee TART
program to people’s lives.
Transportation services that are provided by Truckee TART play a key role in the lives of our
community members who are mobility limited by providing them lifeline access to social and
medical facilities, employment opportunities, educational resources, social events, shopping
opportunities and other basic necessities. These transit services enhance their quality of life,
allow them to maintain their independence, and stay engaged and connect ed to their
community. Truckee TART services are particularly essential to the transit-dependent population
during the winter months when snow and icy conditions make travel challenging.
Town of Truckee efficiently and effectively coordinates transportation services with various social
service agencies and other organizations that have LEP clients. The Nevada County Coordinated
Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan identifies the transportation needs of mobility
limited persons, which includes LEP individuals. Town of Truckee continuously assesses its
programs, activities and services to ensure Truckee TART is providing meaningful access to LEP
individuals.
4. The resources available to the recipient for LEP outreach as well as the costs associated with
that outreach.
Town of Truckee assessed its available resources used to provide LEP assistance, including
determining the cost ($50 - $100 per hour) of professional translation services, which of its
documents would be the most valuable to be translated, and taking an inventory of available
organizations that Town of Truckee could partner with for out reach and translation efforts. For
LEP individuals needing an oral interpreter, Town of Truckee has multilingual staff to assist with
Questions Collective Responses
While performing work functions, have you ever come into contact with
individuals who are non-English speaking or Limited English Proficient? Yes
How frequently do you come into contact with Limited English Proficient
individuals?
Dispatchers: once per day
Drivers: several times per week
Can you identify which language(s) these individuals speak? Spanish
What questions about Truckee Transit did they ask?
Dispatchers: schedule/confirm
their ride
Drivers: fixed route schedule
and cost to ride
Were you able to successfully communicate with individuals who are Limited
English Proficient? Yes
Survey of Transit Dispatchers and Drivers Related to Contact with LEP Individuals
Page 50
Item 6.5
Town of Truckee TART Title VI Compliance Plan Page 20 of 24
such requests. Additionally, the Town recently established and hired a Diversity, Equity, and
Inclusion Program Manager. This position is intended to enhance and further communication
channels with vulnerable, underserved, underrepresented populations and wil l be a new and
additional resource in implementing the Title VI Plan and procedures and policies.
Safe Harbor Provision
The Safe Harbor Provision outlines the threshold at which point written and oral translation of
Truckee TART service information is required as reflected below:
Written Translation of Vital Documents: For each eligible LEP language group that
constitutes five percent (5%) or 1,000 persons, whichever is less, of the total population
of persons eligible to be served or likely to be affected or encountered by Truckee TART
programs, activities or services the written translation of vital documents is required.
Oral Interpreter for Non-Vital Documents: Translation of non-vital documents, if needed,
can be provided orally. If there are fewer than 50 persons in a language group that reaches
the five percent (5%) trigger then Town of Truckee is not required to translate vital written
materials but should provide written notice in the primary language of the LEP language
group of the right to receive competent oral interpretation of those written materials,
free of cost.
As identified through the Four-Factor Analysis, Spanish is the LEP language group within the
Truckee TART service area that meets the written translation guideline. The following documents
are available in Spanish:
Title VI Notice to the Public
Title VI Complaint Procedures
Title VI Complaint Form
Truckee TART Schedule
Truckee TART ADA Application
Public Notices and other pertinent information related to transit
service changes and projects
The Title VI Public Notice is posted at locations outlined in Section 2 of this Compliance Plan. The
remaining documents listed are on the Town of Truckee website (www.townoftruckee.com), are
available at the Town of Truckee administrative office located at 10183 Truckee Airport Road,
Truckee, CA 96161, or by calling the Town of Truckee Clerk’s office at (530) 582-7700.
Translation of any other documents requested in a language other than English or Spanish is
determined on a case-by-case basis.
Providing Language Assistance Services by Language
There are several ways that Town of Truckee provides language assistance services as outlined
below:
Oral and written format
Page 51
Item 6.5
Town of Truckee TART Title VI Compliance Plan Page 21 of 24
By telephone, in person or email
Town of Truckee website Social media
Google Translate
Organizations with LEP clients
Additionally, Town of Truckee can make available at meetings and on the buses the Census
Bureau Language Identification Flashcards, which assists Town of Truckee in identifying language
assistance needs.
Providing Notice to LEP Persons About the Availability of Language Assistance
In order to ensure that LEP individuals are aware of Town of Truckee language assistance
measures, Town of Truckee staff works with organizations that provide services to LEP individuals
to spread awareness of language assistance for Truckee TART services, programs, and activities,
and meetings related to transit service changes or projects . Language assistance information is
posted on the Town of Truckee website, in transit shelters and on buses. Meeting notices, flyers,
and agendas include information about language assistance and are posted or announced with
local stakeholders, radio and news media, and at locations where members of the community
frequent (library, post office, etc.).
Monitoring, Evaluating and Updating the Language Assistance Plan
Town of Truckee updates the LEP Plan and language assistance program as required by Title VI.
At a minimum, the Plan is reviewed and updated every four years in conjunction with the update
and submission of the Title VI Compliance Plan. Census data is reviewed to ensure all LEP
language groups are included utilizing the Four-Factor Analysis. At a minimum, the following
evaluation measures are used to update the Plan:
Determine if local language assistance measures have been effective and sufficient to
meet the needs of the LEP language group.
Any complaints concerning Town of Truckee failure to meet the needs of the LEP language
group.
The number of documented LEP person contacts encountered annually by Truckee TART.
Determine if Town of Truckee’s financial resources are sufficient to fund language
assistance resources needed.
Town of Truckee ensures that individuals have access to its Truckee TART programs, activities
and services by carrying out this Plan.
Staff Training to Provide Timely and Reasonable Language Assistance to LEP Populations
The following training has been provided to Truckee TART employees and its transit contractor
staff:
Page 52
Item 6.5
Town of Truckee TART Title VI Compliance Plan Page 22 of 24
How to respond to LEP callers
How to respond to LEPs in person
How to document LEP needs
How to respond to correspondence from LEPs
How to respond to civil rights complaints
Truckee TART employees and the transit contractor staff have been provided a copy of this Title
VI Compliance Plan for review and reference. New employees associated with Truckee TART are
provided the training outlined above.
Section 7. Racial Breakdown of Transit-Related Non-Elected Planning Boards,
Advisory Councils or Committees.
There are no such non-elected advisory boards or committees associated with the Truckee TART
program. The Town of Truckee is a municipal corporation of the State of California. Transit-
related decisions are made by the Town of Truckee Town Council who are elected officials.
Section 8. Title VI Equity Analysis of Constructed Facilities
There are no construction projects associated with Truckee TART at the time this Title VI
Compliance Plan document was prepared. Town of Truckee complies with equity analysis
requirements at the time that Truckee TART construction projects occur.
Section 9. Board Resolution or Similar Approving the Title VI Plan
Town of Truckee Resolution No. 2022-60 adopting this document is included as Attachment 1
and incorporated herein by reference.
Section 10. Title VI Program Requirements for Fixed Route Transit Providers
Truckee TART operates less than 50 fixed route vehicles in peak service and is not located in an
urbanized area of 200,000. In compliance with Title VI requirements, the following outlines
effective practices to fulfill the service standard and policy guidelines.
Requirement to Set Systemwide Service Standard
1. Vehicle load for each mode: Truckee TART operates one fixed route service with a 32
passenger bus. Vehicle load should not exceed 1.25 passengers per seat.
2. Vehicle headway for each mode: The Truckee TART fixed route operates on hourly headways.
Fixed route service alternatives, including reducing or increasing hourly headways, are
Page 53
Item 6.5
Town of Truckee TART Title VI Compliance Plan Page 23 of 24
developed and considered through the Eastern Nevada County Transit Development Plan
study, which was updated in January 2018. This plan is scheduled to be updated as part of
the Nevada County Transportation Commission’s FY 2022/23 Overall Work Program and
complete in FY 2023/24
3. On-time performance for each mode: Truckee TART fixed route drivers are instructed to
adhere to the published schedule and make all efforts to remain on time. Drivers are not to
leave earlier than the posted time from a bus stop 100% of the time. Drivers are not to depart
scheduled stops more than five minutes late 90% of the time. Late trip occurrences are
included as part of the monthly performance reports submitted to Town of Truckee.
4. Service availability for each mode: The Truckee TART fixed route provides service along the
primary corridor of the transit-dependent and LEP populations identified by Census data in
the Four-Factor Analysis section of this document (Section 6). The fixed route service links
these groups to government, social and medical facilities, employment centers, educational
resources, activity centers, and grocery shopping. General public demand response service is
provided to the outlying neighborhoods (Census Tracts 12.05 and 12.03) not served by the
fixed route and other neighborhoods not within 3/4 of a mile of the fixed route, with priority
service given to ADA eligible passengers.
Requirement to Set Service Policies
1. Distribution of transit amenities for each mode: Truckee TART has a myriad of existing transit
amenities along the fixed route including transit shelters, benches, signage and waste
receptacles. Shelters are located near major activity centers (retail, medical, educational),
low income housing and recreational facilities. Similarly, benches are currently placed at high
boarding locations. As funding allows, additional shelters and benches may be placed at
locations where boardings number six or more persons (shelters) and three or more persons
(benches).
2. Vehicle assignment for each mode: Bus assignments for the fixed route and demand
response services are based on the operating condition of the vehicle fleet (7 buses total)
matched with the route characteristics and passenger requirements. The fixed route
generally operates with a 33-foot bus; in the non-peak seasons a smaller 27-foot bus is
utilized. The demand response service utilizes 22-foot buses. All Truckee TART vehicles are
ADA accessible.
Page 54
Item 6.5
Town of Truckee TART Title VI Compliance Plan Page 24 of 24
TOWN OF TRUCKEE
California
RESOLUTION 2022-60
A RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TRUCKEE
AUTHORIZING THE ADOPTION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE 2022 – 2025 TITLE VI
COMPLIANCE PLAN
WHEREAS, the Town of Truckee is a sub recipient of Federal Transit Administration
financial assistance to operate Truckee Transit programs, activities and services; and
WHEREAS, the U.S. Department of Transportation provides guidelines to comply with
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for Federal Transit Administration recipients and sub
recipients; and
WHEREAS, the U.S. Department of Transportation has developed Title VI provisions as
outlined in FTA Circular 4702.1B, Title VI Requirements and Guidelines for Federal Transit
Administration Recipients; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Truckee Town Council wishes to adopt and subsequently
implement the Title VI Compliance Plan developed and updated by Town of Truckee staff.
* * * * * *
NOW, THEREFORE, THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF TRUCKEE DOES
RESOLVE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
1. That the Town Manager is authorized to sign the 2022 – 2025 Title VI Compliance Plan.
2. That the Town Manager is authorized to implement policies and procedures necessary to
comply with Title VI of Civil Rights Act, and any subsequent amendments
The foregoing Resolution was introduced by _____________, seconded by
______________, at a Regular Meeting of the Truckee Town Council, held on the 27th day
of September 2022, and adopted by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
_______________________________
Courtney Henderson, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Judy Price, MMC, Town Clerk
Page 55
Item 6.5
Date: September 27, 2022
Honorable Mayor and Council Members
Michael Vaughan, Senior Engineer
Title: 2022 Recessed Striping Project, C2003 – Contract Award
Approved By: Jen Callaway, Town Manager
Recommended Action: Town Council award the 2022 Recessed Striping Project to Specialized
Pavement Marking in the amount of $252,626.50; authorize a project contingency amount of $25,263
(10%); and authorize the Town Engineer to approve contract change orders or changes to unit quantities
within the approved contingency amount for a total authorized contract expenditure amount of
$277,889.50.
Discussion: The 2022 Recessed Striping Project, C2003, was publicly advertised and a bid was received
from Specialized Pavement Marking in the amount of $252,626.50. Attached is the Bid Summary. The
project proposes to perform recessed striping in the following areas.
Donner Pass Road from SR89S/Frates Lane to Bridge Street.
Truckee Way from the Church Street roundabout to the Stockrest Springs roundabout.
Truckee Way from the I-80 bridge to the SR89N roundabout.
Glenshire Drive from Truckee Way to Berkshire Circle (except the future roundabout location).
Brockway Road from Palisades Drive to Estates Drive.
Priority:
Enhanced Communication Climate and Greenhouse Gas Reduction Housing
X Infrastructure Investment Emergency and Wildfire Preparedness X Core Service
Fiscal Impact: The low bid amount for this project was submitted by Specialized Pavement Marking in
the amount of $252,626.50. Staff recommends adding a 10% contingency ($25,263) to the bid amount
to cover any unforeseen conditions that would require additional cost, for a total authorized contract
expenditure amount of $277,889.50. Staff also recommends that Council authorize the Town Engineer
to approve contract change orders or changes to unit quantities within the approved contingency amount
should they be necessary for successful completion of the project. The proposed project is within the
approved project budget amount of $400,000 (Measure V Funding Source).
Public Communication: Standard public bid notices were published for this project.
Attachments: Bid Summary
Page 56
Item 6.6
ITEM ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE ITEM TOTAL
1 Mobilization/Demobilization 1 LS $16,000.00 $16,000.00
2 Temporary Traffic Control 1 LS $29,000.00 $29,000.00
3
Remove and Replace Double 4”
Wide Yellow Center Line - Detail
21 (Recessed Thermoplastic)
33,045 LF $4.90 $161,920.50
4
Remove and Replace Single 4”
Wide Yellow Center Line - Detail
5 (Recessed Thermoplastic)
1,700 LF $4.30 $7,310.00
5
Remove and Replace 8” Wide
White Lane Line - Detail 38A
(Recessed Thermoplastic)
2,020 LF $7.80 $15,756.00
6
Remove and Replace Two-Way
Left Turn Lane Lines - Detail 31
(Recessed Thermoplastic)
2,830 LF $8.00 $22,640.00
TOTAL BID $252,626.50
2022 Recessed Striping Project, C2003
Specialized Pavement Marking
Bid Summary
Bids opened by Judy Price, Town Clerk, on September 15, 2022 at 11:00 AM at Truckee Town Hall
Page 57
Item 6.6
Date: September 27, 2022
Honorable Mayor and Council Members:
Author and title: Becky Bucar, Engineering Manager
Title: West River Street Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1 Town Vote
Approved By: Jen Callaway, Town Manager
Recommended Action: Authorize Town Manager to cast a ballot to vote in the affirmative for the West
River Street Landscaping and Lighting District No. 1.
Discussion: At their September 13, 2022 meeting, the Town Council initiated proceedings to form the
West River Landscaping and Lighting Assessment District No. 1 (LLD No. 1). The proposed W est River
LLD No. 1 would provide maintenance funding for infrastructure built through multiple projects that
construct sidewalks, landscaping, lighting, crosswalks, parking, medians, and underground utilities. The
projects that make up the infrastructure improvements in the assessment district include Legacy Trail-
Brockway Road Multi-Use Trail (completed summer 2021), West River Streetscape, West River Park,
and Reimagine Bridge Street.
In order for the Landscape and Lighting District to pass, it must receive fifty percent (50%) plus one vote
in the affirmative. The Town owns the property at 10257 West River Street (Old County Corp Yard). The
maximum parcel assessment for this property is $30,639, which represents 41% of the total potential
votes. Staff is recommending that Council direct staff to cast a ballot to vote in the affirmative for the
LLD. At the November 8 public hearing, the Town Clerk will tally the votes with and without the Town
vote so that the Council can determine whether the Town’s vote is required to pass the district (and to
what extent) prior to deciding to form the district
Priority:
Enhanced Communication X Climate and Greenhouse Gas Reduction Housing
X Infrastructure Investment Emergency and Wildfire Preparedness X Core Service
Fiscal Impact: If the Landscape and Lighting District passes, the private property owners will fund
$43,268 per year in maintenance (at build out). The Town funds the remainder ($47,032) in the form of
the general benefit and property assessment described previously. Should the assessment district fail,
the Town would not have a revenue stream to fund the maintenance.
Public Communication: None beyond this staff report.
Attachments: None
Page 58
Item 6.7
Date: September 27, 2022
Honorable Mayor and Council Members:
Author and title: Denyelle Nishimori, Community Development Director
Title: Joint Council/Planning Commission Study Session – Direction on Draft 2040 General
Plan
Approved By: Jen Callaway, Town Manager
Recommended Action: That the Town Council and Planning Commission discuss changes, edits,
responses to comments, and additional information prepared by staff thus far, and since the
spring/summer kick-off of the 2040 General Plan Update adoption process, provide direction to staff.
Discussion: The Planning Commission and Council began looking at the completed draft 2040 General
Plan in spring/summer 2022. Since that time, Council and Planning Commission has met jointly four
times, the Historic Preservation Advisory Committee has met and there has been a community open
house and coffee talks available as outlets to receive community feedback and input. Since release of
the draft 2040 General Plan, staff has been collecting comments and feedback from Council,
Commissioners and the public and prepared written responses to public comment/prior
Council/Commission discussion and associated modifications to draft 2040 General Plan goals, policies
and actions in alignment with previous Council/Commission direction. Staff also met with Truckee
Fire/CAL FIRE/Ascent on the draft Safety and Noise Element and asked Ascent to prepare a written
response to Council’s direction to modify the Climate Action Element to meet 2040 greenhouse gas
emissions reductions targets (Attachment 4). Other staff priorities included Historic Preservation Advisory
Commission (HPAC) final review of the draft Downtown Truckee Plan, comprehensive modifications to
the Economic Development Element and communication with Ascent about Draft Environmental Review
Comments/Responses to Comments and adoption schedule.
Based on this work, staff is seeking Council/Commission direction on the following topics:
1. Edits to the June 22, 2022 draft 2040 General Plan included in Attachment 2.
a. Has staff adequately responded to public and Council/Commission
interests/concerns/comments?
b. Do the proposed edits reflect the Council/Commission’s vision for the 2040 General Plan?
2. Revising the Draft Climate Action Plan (CAP) to try to meet 2040 greenhouse gas emissions
reduction targets will require substantial modifications to the (CAP) and will delay 2040 General
Plan adoption. In addition, it may not be possible to modify it enough to achieve Council’s goals.
It should be noted that, per Ascent, the current draft CAP is in alignment with the state trends and
is as aggressive as other community CAP’s.
a. Council previously modified Action CAP-11.F to require update of the CAP every four
years. Can 2040 targets be considered as part of next CAP update versus with 2040
General Plan Adoption?
3. The General Plan Actions time frames included in Attachment 3.
a. Are there any modifications to the draft timeframes (short term, midterm, long term, on-
going) to consider?
4. Continued use of Level of Service (LOS) as a metric in the Mobility Element.
Page 59
Item 7.1
a. Should LOS standards be maintained?
5. Outstanding topics to be addressed.
a. Are there any topics the Council/Commission would like to discuss before moving the draft
general plan to adoption hearings?
b. Staff recommend an additional joint Council/Commission session, tentatively scheduled
for October 11, 20022. Staff notes the following discussion topics planned for an October
11, 2022 joint study session:
2040 General Plan Vision Statement
Draft Economic Development Element re-write
Draft Safety and Noise Element revisions based on work with CAL FIRE
Floor Area Ratio (FAR) as a combined residential/commercial standard
Workforce housing in the Commercial Land Use Designation
Gateway area density for hospital-owned properties (currently contemplated for
12-32 dwelling units per acre)
Mini storage/gas station prohibition, commercial square footage limit
Depending on the number and complexity of additional topics raised by Council/Commission, an
additional joint study session beyond the planned October 11, 2022 study session may be needed.
Updates: For additional context on the Safety and Noise Element, Economic Development Element as
well as HPAC review, see the summaries below.
Draft Safety and Noise Element
The Town’s Safety and Noise Element is required to be reviewed by the California Board of Forestry and
Fire Protection 90 days prior to Council adoption. Through the Resource Protection Committee (RPC)
and with assistance from the CAL FIRE Land Use Planning team, the board will review the Safety
Element and RPC recommendations and respond with findings regarding the uses of land and policies
that will protect life, property and natural resources from unreasonable risk associated with wildfires, and
the methods and strategies for wildfire risk reduction and prevention within very high fire hazard severity
zones. CAL FIRE provides direct assistance to local jurisdictions, including review of a self-assessment,
to ensure the plan adequately addresses protection from unreasonable risk from wildfire and includes
feasible implementation measures. Our assigned CAL FIRE staff is Shane Vargas, CAL FIRE Battalion
Chief. The Board is only able to review “final” safety elements, meaning elements that are not subject to
further change, so all edits to the element must be done prior to scheduling. The one caveat to this is if
a jurisdiction wants to add something that is more restrictive.
The Board’s next available meeting date to consider the Town’s safety element is November 1, 2022. If
a jurisdiction, upon reviewing RPC’s recommendations decides not to use them, the Board can ask for a
written response from the jurisdiction and ultimately a meeting with the Town Council if they are not
satisfied with the response. Completion of the pre-assessment and review by CAL FIRE is intended to
provide the tools necessary to avoid a meeting and ensure the element can be adopted and implemented
by the local jurisdiction.
A November 1, 2022 Board review date means that the tentative November 1 Planning Commission 2040
General Plan adoption hearing will need to move to a later date.
Ascent has started initial work on the self-assessment and staff anticipates bringing changes resulting
from working with CAL FIRE to a joint October 11, 2022 Council/Commission study session.
Draft Economic Development Element
Staff is currently revising the draft Economic Development Element to reflect Council/Commission
directed provided at the August 16, 2022, joint study session. These changes will be included in the
October 11, 2022, joint Council/Commission joint study session. Changes to the draft Economic
Page 60
Item 7.1
Development Element included in Attachment #2 are ones raised by public comment and/or prior
Council/Commission direction that will be incorporated into the next draft.
Historic Preservation Advisory Commission
The Historic Preservation Advisory Commission reviewed the draft Downtown Truckee Plan at their
August 10, 2022 and September 14, 2022 meetings and provided the following feedback for
consideration into the next draft Downtown Truckee Plan. Staff is currently working with Ascent on
responses to these comments as well as proposed edits.
Most important to HPAC: LU-R-1 & LU-5 or similar policy should be in every subarea
policies to highlight the importance of preserving historic character (Policy HR-4 should be
seen throughout the document). Historic preservation should be driven home throughout
document. New development should complement and be subordinate to historic
resources.
LU-5 and LU-R-1 should be incorporated into Page 2-13 to promote development that fits
Historic Design Guidelines should supersede the Objective Design Standards.
A majority of the HPAC identified that they were uncomfortable with another vehicle bridge
in downtown and said that diminished LOS is okay. There isn’t enough information on
potential impacts.
Post office and fire district should be kept in the downtown.
Public art should be reviewed on a case-by-case basis with HPAC reviewing the art. Art
should not overwhelm the district. Public art – deference to history, but would like flexibility.
Four wayfinding/walking signs seems like a good amount – Moody’s, middle of Commercial
Row, west side of Commercial Row, and at West River Street Parking – west end and at Jax.
The four should be the same, but distinct from other signage.
No advertising should be allowed in signage.
Uniform signage would make them visually unobtrusive. Signage can be unique and
Truckee-specific.
Gateway – landscaping and sculptures are appropriate and can be done subtly. No actual
signage is needed. They don’t all need to say “Welcome to Truckee.”
Town Square – shouldn’t be in Railyard, could consider the Beacon. But a new Town Square
is not needed. Eagle Plaza and occasional closing of Donner Pass Road is sufficient.
Need language on food trucks to make them temporary/limited.
West River Park, Truckee Springs, pedestrian bridge is a great step to access to the river.
Outdoor dining – Some is good as long as sidewalk is maintained.
Trash and recycling services should work with TTSD to diminish the impacts of onsite refuse
and recycling.
Parking structure could be supported, but perhaps a lower height
HPAC also provided specific language changes, which will be added to the document before the Planning
Commission adoption hearing:
Page 3-13, P-5: Change “reminiscent” to “compatible” or “appropriate to the historic
setting.”
Page 4-10, PR-A-3: Change “Require the use of materials…to “Require the use of materials
and finishes…”
Page 4-12, PR-S-5: Change “The sign colors…” to “The sign materials and colors…”
Page 2-7: Change “The Commercial Core will continue to be a primary community hub…”
to “The Commercial Core will continue to be the heart and soul…”
Page 2-12: Suggest replacing “popular restaurant” with a statement of the value and
necessity of maintaining the historic character/resources structures.
Page 61
Item 7.1
Page 2-10: Update to include 2-acre property owned by the Truckee Historical Society for
an Ice Pond. 24 acres is owned by Truckee Donner Land Trust.
Page 2-12: Value and necessity of preserving historic resources structures should be
incorporated into the Hilltop Subarea section.
The following additional modifications to the draft Downtown Truckee Plan provided by
Council/Commission will also be added to the next draft:
Add different standards for public art Downtown
Add more language about indigenous heritage /historic resources in the public realm, encourage
indigenous art by indigenous artists
Ensure Hilltop is prioritized
Add more consideration of bike parking
Add a summary of potential funding sources
Ensure the plan reflects a balance between public gathering spaces and economic development
opportunities
General Plan Adoption
Staff originally held November 1 and November 29 as tentative adoption hearing dates with the Planning
Commission and Council respectively. These dates will be subject to feedback and review by the Board
of Forestry and as such will continue to provide updated adoption timelines at future meetings.
Priority:
X Enhanced Communication X Climate and Greenhouse Gas Reduction X Housing
X Infrastructure Investment X Emergency and Wildfire Preparedness X Core Service
Fiscal Impact: The General Plan Update is authorized under CIP C1903. The Town Council approved a
contract with Ascent Environmental in August 2018 for $1,078,036 with a 15% contingency ($161,705).
The not-to-exceed total was $1,239,741, without further Council approval. In July 2020, the Council
approved an additional $85,000, increasing the not-to-exceed total to $1,324,741. In March 2021, the
Council approved an additional $210,710, increasing the not-to-exceed amount to $1,535,451. Including
the last amendment for $178,741 with 15% contingency ($26,811), the new not-to-exceed total is
$1,741,003.
Public Communication: Standard noticing of the agenda, notification to GPAC, social media posts, e-
notification. Public comments can be submitted through the standard agenda posting:
https://portal.laserfiche.com/k4088/forms/tpYPx#!/
Attachments:
1. General Plan Update Public Comment Spreadsheet prepared by Staff, dated September 19, 2022
2. Draft General Plan Update Edits prepared by Staff, dated September 19, 2022
3. General Plan Update Actions Time Frame Matrix prepared by Staff, dated September 19, 2022
4. Climate Action Plan Element Memo, prepared by Ascent Environmental, September 2022
5. Additional Council/Commission Question/Comments and Staff Answers, prepared by Staff, dated
September 19, 2022
6. LOS Memo, prepared by Staff
Page 62
Item 7.1
Comment
Number Action, Name, Affiliation Public Comment Staff Response Recommended Changes?
1
General Comment: Land Use Element
Name: Jennifer Bloomfield
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
Why aren't the projects located within the Coldstream Specific Plan, Joerger Ranch Specific Plan and
the Railyard included in the summary numbers of Development Capacity in the Public Draft June 2022,
2040 Appendix B, Development Capacity and Growth Projections, Page B-12?
The development capacity uses the 2014 future traffic model data
from LSC for Coldstream, Joerger Ranch and the Railyard. This covers
all development permitted under the adopted plans, which would
include any projects.
2
Policy: LU-9.9 Public Access to Truckee River
Name: Leigh Chavez Affiliation:
Placer County
The policy states: “ Establish a public access point to and parking area near the Truckee
River.” The policy should consider establishing multiple public access points and multiple
parking areas near the Truckee River. Placer County suggests revising the policy to allow
and encourage multiple public access points and parking areas. These parking areas
should also be considered for multi-use parking areas, i.e. transitional parking areas to
downtown and/ or overflow parking, encouraged to be constructed near or in
conjunction with transit stops, etc. to allow multi-use of these parking areas.
Staff recommends modifying this policy to include reference to
multiple access points.
Update LU-9.9 to reflect multiple access
points.
3
Goal LU-9: West River District
Name: Leigh Chavez Affiliation:
Placer County
An additional policy should be added to incorporate consideration of trail connections
and access to existing and future trails.
The Trails and Bikeways Master Plan provides a comprehensive plan
for trails throughout Truckee. After the 2040 General Plan is adopted,
there is opportunity to update the plan to reflect 2040 General Plan
policies and actions, including any changes needed for West River
Street.
4
Action: LU-4.A Name: Jan
Zabriskie Affiliation: Town
Council
Action LU-4.A calls for the identification of at least another five acres of land suitable for industrial
development. However, BAE, in its 2020 Non-
Residential demand analysis, at page 75, stated that 10 acres is needed. Based on the BAE analysis
and, in order to facilitate the movement of
industries off of West River, change the amount of land to be identified for new industrial uses from
five to fifteen acres.
5
Policy: LU-3.6 Name: Jan
Zabriskie Affiliation: Town
Council
Policy LU-3.6 would allow buildings up to 30,000 square feet if the projects would provide “community
benefits.” This last sentence should be stricken
because of the difficulty in determining what constitutes a “community benefit,” and to avoid the
uncertainty that this undefined term creates for
developers, as well as the appearances of favoritism that would arise from allowing a 30,000 square
foot building based on this vague of a standard.
Land Use Element
Page 63
Item 7.1
Comment
Number Action, Name, Affiliation Public Comment Staff Response Recommended Changes?
1
Goal: CC-5: Public Art
Name: Troy Corliss
Affiliation: Public Art Commission Truckee, Chair
The 2040 Dft. G.P. Chp. 3 includes the Goal and Action Items relating to Public Art.
This section builds upon the 2025 General Plan, Goal CC-21 “Support arts and
cultural activities and amenities in Truckee.” by recognizing the programs that have developed over
the last decade. The 2025 G.P. provided a platform by which the Truckee Cultural District, Truckee’s
first Public Art Master Plan and ensuing Public Art Commission have been created. These initiatives
have established formal public, private and county partnerships in the State, CA designation as one of
14 Cultural Districts (TCD), a community generated vision for public art in Town (PAMP) and a
commission that has been cataloguing and developing policy to enable greater inclusion of public art
on Town owned and privately developed property. The Public Art Commission Truckee has been
active since September 2020 developing many of the goals set forward through the public art master
plan. As we look ahead to generate foresight and vision with in the 2040 General Plan, we are pleased
to see the dedicated section relating to Public Art, which builds upon specific areas of focus that have
been identified with in the PAMP, Innovate Gateway and the 2025 G.P. These Goals help to support
the general themes expressed by the community through the PAMP process, which are; greater
access to and inclusion of art in publicly accessible spaces, greater emphasis on a variety of disciplines
beyond visual art (i.e. music, dance, performance, etc.) and the development of sustainable funding
mechanisms to ensure program development. During our July meeting, PACT will take the
opportunity to review the 2040 Draft General Plan Chapter 3 Community Character Element, Goals
CC-5: Public Art as a group to provide formal discussion and comments relating to this section.
I anticipate that our group will generally be in favor of the Goals and Actions- CC-5 as drafted and may
likely suggest a few minor revisions for consideration. As a group, PACT will offer a formal set of
comments to be considered the Planning Commission and Town Council at the August review of the
2040 G.P. Draft.
Comment noted.
2
Goal: CC-5: Public Art
Name: Troy Corliss
Affiliation: Public Art Commission Truckee, Chair
Dear Council Members & Commissioners,
Thank you for taking the time to include and review the Public Art element CC -5 in the Community
Character section in the 2040 draft General Plan. We
have made great progress incorporating art and culture into Town life since the time that the 2025
General Plan was drafted and I am encouraged to see
the public art program and the Truckee Cultural District continue to take shape in the coming decade.
The Public Art Commission Truckee supports the addition of the policies and actions in the CC -5
Public Art element and in favor of the town staff
recommendations for incorporating these items within the 2049 General Plan. In addition, we have
collectively submitted detailed comments which fine
tune several items to ideally suit the needs facing the program in the coming years.
As an emerging program, the Town Public Art Commission will need to develop stable funding
mechanisms, implement policy guidelines for the
selection and commissioning of works of art as well as artist informed projects and, will need to
continue to develop public/ private partnerships that
encourage creative participation within our collective built environment.
I would have liked to provide these comments in person, however, I am currently making my way
deep into the High Sierra for a second week a photo
exploration in the remote back country. I am grateful for all the hard work you have done to bring this
draft of the general plan to life and am sorry that I
am not able to join you in person!
Thanks again for incorporating art and culture into this 2040 general plan draft. And I look forward to
working with you through the Public Art
Commission Truckee to make the adopted policies and actions a reality.
Comment noted.
3
Policy: CC-1.3
Name: Jennifer Bloomfield
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
As seen in Figure CC-1: page 3-3,the "Other views" illustrated by an orange line with an arrow should
be delineated as a Scenic Corridors.
Figure CC-1 is substantially similar to the 2025 General Plan
scenic resources map. The Council would need to decide if
they support amending the location of scenic corridors--which
are along designated roadways.
4
Action: CC-1.A
Name: Jennifer Bloomfield
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
The Development Code should be reviewed and amended to include, to establish objective standards
to preserve see Figure CC-1: Scenic Resources - Scenic Corridors and Other Views (should be grouped
with Scenic Corridors and Renamed to Reflect the new classification.)
5
Action: CC-1.B Name:
Jennifer Bloomfield
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
Please do evaluate and amend the Development Code as needed to implement the scenic corridor
(also includes scenic views) standards. Do Not consider reducing any scenic corridor buffers to allow
mixed-use projects of any kind.
The Council would need to decide if they want to further
restrict what is allowed in scenic corridors and define/create
standards for scenic views.
Communty Character Element
Page 64
Item 7.1
6
Policy: CC-1.1 Name:
Jennifer Bloomfield
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
Prohibit development which negatively impacts scenic corridors (and scenic views) Figure CC-1.
7
Policy: CC-1.1 Name:
Jennifer Bloomfield
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
Modify Protection of Visual Resources to prohibit development in identified historic view sheds.The Council would need to decide if they want to define and
create standards for "historic viewsheds."
8
CC-5: Public Art Goal: CC-5.1:
Public Art Name:
Public Art Commission of Truckee
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
Support and enhance the arts to express Truckee's identity. Promote high-quality, innovative, and
diverse public art that enhances the community and contributes to the town’s unique character.
Support creative expression in public spaces through a variety of artistic disciplines, including visual,
music and performance. Emphasize projects with a local context, local artists, and artist-designed
architectural features. Support art with a local context, local artists, and functional art such as
sculptural bicycle racks, trash receptacles, and outdoor seating. [Source: New policy, Public Art
Master Plan, Innovate Gateway]
Staff supports this with a change from "emphasize" to
"prioritize" and removal of "architectural feature" as the
reference to projects is all-inclusive.
Update CC-5.1 to reflect revised
language.
9
Goal: CC-5.2 Art on Town-Owned Property
Name: Public Art Commission of Truckee
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
Support and facilitate the Town’s permanent collection, temporary exhibits, artistic programming and
performances art exhibits, artistic programming, and performances on Town-owned property.
[Source: 2025 General Plan, Community Character Element, Policy P21.3, modified]
Staff recommends maintaining CC-5.2 as proposed.
10
Goal: CC-5.3 Collaboration with Community Partners
Name: Public Art Commission of Truckee
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
Collaboratively support the inclusion of artists, arts organizations, non-profits, members of the
community, and local governmental agencies to develop a summit between artists, arts organizations,
members of the community, the Chamber of Commerce, the Truckee Tahoe Community Foundation,
and local governmental agencies to discuss ways to promote the arts in the Truckee area. [Source:
2025 General Plan, Community Character Element, Policy P21.4, modified]
Staff supports this change. Update CC-5.3 with revised
language.
11
Goal: CC-5.4 **Suggest moving this before 5.3 above**
Name: Public Art Commission of Truckee
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
Support the Public Art Commission of Truckee by implementing guidelines for the selection and
placement of public art, the development of sustainable funding mechanisms, and the
implementation of goals and actions identified within the PAMP.in working with property and
business owners to identify potential locations for public art or spaces for galleries and other arts-
based businesses. [Source: New policy, Innovate Gateway, modified]
Staff supports this change, including renumbering the policy
number.
Update CC-5.4 with revised
language, including identifying this
as Goal CC-5.2.
12
Goal: CC-5.5 Cultural District Goal: CC-5.6 Art
in Private Development Name: Public
Art Commission of Truckee
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
Continue to support the Truckee Cultural District partnership in highlighting public art and promotion
of Truckee and cultural assets. (Source: New policy, Public Arts Master Plan]. Encourage the inclusion
of public art, publicly accessible display space, and cultural facilities in private development. (**The
PACT would potentially like to include language on eventually financially supporting/partnering to
encourage public-private partnerships**)[Source: 2025 General Plan, Community Character Element,
Policy P21.5, modified]
Staff recommends adding public-private partnerships to Action
CC-5.C.
Update Action CC-5.C to include
public-private partnerships.
13
Action: CC-5A Truckee Public Art Master Plan Action: CC-5.B
Dedicated Funding Name: Public Art
Commission of Truckee
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
Implement the goals and policies of the Truckee Public Art Master Plan, including support of the
Public Art Commission of Truckee. Review and revise the Public Art Master Plan every 10 years
[Source: New action]. Explore dedicated funding sources and guidelines for public art such as a budget
line item, a percentage of Capital Improvement Project (CIP) budgets, percentage of Transient
Occupancy Tax, or other General Fund options. [Source: New action, Public Art Master Plan]
• Responsibility: Assistant to the Town Manager
• Time Frame: Ongoing
Staff recommends maintaining the language as originally
proposed. Transient Occupancy tax money collected becomes
part of the Town's General Fund which is already identified in
the action.
14
Action: CC-5.B.2 **this is a proposed new addition**
Name: Public Art Commission of Truckee
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
Maintain an established Public Art Fund. Maintain funding and support of a Public Art Fund via the
Public Art Committee of Truckee.
The Council would need to decide if they want to add a general
plan action specific to the creation/on-going funding of a
Public Art Fund.
15
Action: CC-5.C External Funding Sources
Name: Public Art Commission of Truckee
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
Establish mechanisms for incorporating external funding sources, such as gifting policy, grants, and
collaborations with special districts. Coordinate with the Truckee Cultural District and local arts
organizations, such as the Truckee Arts Alliance, to explore external funding sources. [Source: New
action, Public Art Master Plan]
• Responsibility: Assistant to the Town Manager
• Time Frame: Ongoing
Staff recommends consideration of new language in response
to the public comment, "Collaborate with the Truckee Cultural
District, local arts organizations, community partners and
special districts to explore new external funding sources such
as donations, grants, public-private partnerships, etc."
Update CC-5.C to reflect revised
language.
16
Action: CC-5.D Art Education Name:
Public Art Commission of Truckee
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
Continue toP partner with the Tahoe Truckee Unified School District, art educators, and art education
organizations, like Arts for the Schools, and community partners to support and promote art
education for all ages in the classroom and beyond. [Source: New action, Public Art Master Plan]
• Responsibility: Assistant to the Town Manager
• Time Frame: Ongoing
Staff supports the proposed changes with maintaining the
"Continue to partner with…" language.
Update CC-5.D to reflect revised
language.
The Council would need to decide if they want to further
restrict what is allowed in scenic corridors and define/create
standards for scenic views.
Page 65
Item 7.1
17
Action: CC-5.E Relationships with Private Developers, Businesses,
Public Agencies Public Art Incentives Name:
Public Art Commission of Truckee
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
Update the Development Code floor area ratio (FAR) incentives for mixed-use projects and planned
development mandatory project features in the Development Code to better incentivize public art
and cultural facilities. Prioritize artist-informed designs of public spaces, architectural amenities and
functional art, Include preferences for functional art, art with a local context, and art from a local
artists. Use the commissioners and staff working on behalf of the Public Art Commission of Truckee as
the first outreach arm for engaging with Engage with key stakeholders (e.g., building community,
development community, arts community) in establishing appropriate incentives. [Source: 2025
General Plan, Community Character Element, Action A21.2, Innovate Gateway, modified]
• Responsibility: Community Development Department
• Time Frame: Short term
Staff supports the proposed changes with some modifications
to keep the action broad.
Update CC-5.E to reflect revised
language.
18
Action: CC-5.F Public Art Review Selection and Acquisition
Name: Public Art Commission of Truckee
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
Amend the Development Code to create a process for reviewing and approving public art as part of a
development project or as a part of an existing development. [Source: New Action]
• Responsibility: Community Development Department
• Time Frame: Short term
Staff recommends new language for the action title, "Land Use
Entitlement Public Art Review" to clarify the review is specific
to developed private property. Staff notes that art on private
property could be either privately owned or publicly dedicated.
Update Action CC-5.F to state,
"Land Use Entitlement Public Art
Review."
19
CC-1.2 Name: Ruth Miller
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
What does it mean to "contribute to and enhance the scene quality and visual harmony"? This feels
too squishy to be useful. I don't envy future commissioners trying to make sense of this phrasing. As
an alternative: "Ensure that new development in natural areas takes reasonable effort to minimize
the physical development footprint while maximizing opportunities for users of the future
development to enjoy the natural spaces."
Staff recommends new language," Ensure that new
development in Truckee's lowland areas, including its forested
areas and meadowlands, and in the Truckee River Valley,
contributes to and enhances the scenic quality and visual
harmony between the natural and built environment." Note
this change also includes changes from Council/Commission
August 16, 2022 Q&A.
Update CC-1.2 to reflect revised
language.
20
CC-1.8 / CC1.D Name:
Ruth Miller Affiliation: Truckee
Resident
This conflicts with our walkability goals. This is Truckee's densest transit corridor and best
bike/walking path. I understand the goal of keeping it from feeling too built up, but there's too much
opportunity with this corridor to just give it two conflicting policies. A specific plan for this corridor
would be appropriate. In the mean time, I propose either eliminating this policy, or replacing it with
something like: "Ensure new development along this corridor integrates shade trees and other natural
elements to echo the existing natural aesthetic."
Council supported deletion of CC-1.8 and CC 1.D at their
August 16, 2022 joint session meeting.
Delete CC-1.8 and CC-1.D
21
CC-1.12 Name: Ruth Miller
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
We watched the Veterans Hall chimney get replaced with some kind of telecom equipment (across
from our house), and the end result is totally identical to the original, and it was brilliant. Kudos to
whoever thought of that, and yes to more.
Comment noted.
22
CC-1.B Name: Ruth Miller
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
Yes!! Our need for housing is more important than someone's need to look at trees when they drive
through at 80+ mph.
Comment noted.
23
CC-1.C Name: Ruth Miller
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
I love this!Comment noted.
24
CC-3.1 Name: Ruth Miller
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
This is also pretty squishy. I believe "quality" here means "not cheap", like it won't fall down or break
apart? If that's correct, could this be more specific?
Staff recommends maintaining the language as proposed.
Actions CC-3.A and CC-3.B which identify the creation of
objective design standards would create tangible definitions to
implement this policy.
25
CC-3.2 Name: Ruth Miller
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
I'm surprised to see that we discourage new architecture that mimics the historic buildings. I
understand not wanting to look like Disney World, but it can be done. What if someone wanted to
rebuild a building that burned down, based on photos? Also, it seems like we spend a lot of time
saying what not to do, but don't offer many examples of what we do like. Could we include some
visual references of what we want people to aim for?
Discouraging architecture that mimics historic buildings helps
celebrate historic buildings and their unique value in
representing Truckee's past. This language was also copied
from the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the
Treatment of Historic Properties, and is incorporated in
Downtown Specific Plan Volume III (Historic Design Guidelines)
as regulation.
26
CC-3 Name: Ruth Miller
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
suggestion #1: Similar to how we're working our way away from billboards, suggestion to do the same
for gas stations, drive throughs, and other car-oriented architecture.
suggestion #2: Smaller retail spaces are more walkable and historically accurate. Encourage new
development downtown to produce retail spaces under 1200 square feet (please verify this number
with some local business owners). Some examples of this working really well in Las Vegas, Bogota,
Boston, and naturally Oakland.
The Council is currently considering a gas station and mini-
storage prohibition as part of the 2040 General Plan Update
process. Staff recommends adding a new Action LU-1.4 to
consider changing highway commercial zoning to more
neighborhood-serving zoning. Staff notes that drive-thru
businesses are currently only allowed in highway commercial
zoning. Staff recommends adding an additional bullet under
Policy CC-3.2: "Encourage the creation of new leasable retail
spaces Downtown that are less than 5,000 sf. to support the
small business and walkable development pattern of
Downtown.
Reference proposed new Action LU-
1.4 to convert Highway Commercial
(CH) zoning to neighborhood
zoning reflective of 2040 land
designations; update CC-3.2 to
reflect revised language.
Page 66
Item 7.1
27
CC-4.8 Name: Ruth Miller
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
I love this, too! I propose going a step further, and working with the Washoe Tribe to develop a land
acknowledgement statement. My dream would be to read a statement like this before every planning
commission meeting, to remind ourselves that while we're the current stewards of this land, this land
has both a long history and a long future, and we need to plan with respect for both.
The Council would want to decide if they want the creation of
a land acknowledgment statement included in the 2040
General Plan.
28
CC-4.I Name: Ruth Miller
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
This is cool! There's some cool and low cost tech that could support this, too. A long time ago in
Charlotte and Philadelphia, I saw signs about self guided walking tours where you call a number and it
just reads you the history of the spot. At this point QR codes could be pretty easy to pull off, but I
liked the audio component. Either or both.
Comment noted.
29
CC-5.6 Name: Ruth Miller
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
I genuinely wondered about painting a mural on my garage door at one point, but worried it would
conflict with the historic district. Please clarify what kinds of "private development" are in bounds.
Maybe give some more examples?
Staff recommends modifying the policy title to read, "Art in
Development Projects" and the policy language to read,
"Encourage the inclusion of public art, publicly accessible
display spaces and/or cultural facilities as part of new
development projects and with land use applications for major
modifications to existing non-residential and multi-family
projects."
Update CC-5.6
30
CC-5 Name: Ruth Miller
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
suggestion #1: Is there a way to incorporate the Washoe in the public art planning and review? Would
they like to participate in that? suggestion #2: I like
the informational resources planned for historic resources. Can we do something similar for the art?
A QR code for each mural to learn more? Maybe a self-guided walking tour past all the key works?
suggestion #3: I feel like the token millennial here, but the Town or Chamber should publish guidance
on how to design and install art that is optimized for sharing on social media. Moab, for example, has
a big "MOAB" mural like our "TRUCKEE" one at the Truckee post office, but theirs is in full sun and
there's a line to take photos with it. Ours is mostly shaded, which is a huge lost opportunity for selfies
and free marketing. Placement, texture, color, trends: it's more complicated than it seems.
(1) The Washoe are interested in working with the Town on
sites with Washoe cultural resources. For example, signage
along Legacy Trail Phase IV. (2-3) These ideas could be
explored with the next Public Arts Master Plan update.
31
CC-6 Name: Ruth Miller
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
suggestion #1: Aging parents are increasingly top of mind for me, and it would be cool to see Truckee
explore something like this Age Friendly Business certification from Boston. Downtown can be pretty
hectic, and helping seniors navigate it independently will support our goals.
An age friendly business program could be something for the
Town's Diversity/Equity/Inclusion staff person to explore.
32
CC-7.4 Name: Ruth Miller
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
Public bathrooms are a big issue for families, and should be called out with the emphasis on public
buildings.
The Council would want to decide if they want to address
public restrooms specifically.
33
CC-8.7 Name: Ruth Miller
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
I like this. Please extend to discouraging businesses from dedicating parking spots to specific
businesses. I'm thinking of the Donner Park Center, where it feels like maybe you're supposed to
move your car if you get tea after dropping off a package.
Businesses are currently not allowed to dedicate parking
spaces to specific tenants within a multi-tenant site.
34
General Comment Name: Ruth
Miller Affiliation: Truckee Resident
That sunset photo on page 3-6 is amazing.Comment noted.
35
General Comment Name: Kathy
Echols Affiliation: Truckee Resident
The Community Character Elements are good goals, but the
Land Use Alternative actions do not seem to support these goals. " Park once environments" is an
important goal, but the density proposed for the Gateway area is the over-riding concern. The height
and density of buildings (even just on the
north side) will create diminished viewsheds, tunnelling effects, snow removal
problems, and overcrowding. The Gateway area is an important area to locals as they access schools,
the hospital and medical offices, and grocery shopping. Town character
should also consider the use of the area by locals. Flexible gathering spaces,
protecting views, and supporting a Gateway neighborhood character is very
important, and the proposed density does not support these goals.
Scenic Corridor Standards should not be reduced to allow for high density development in Gateway,
Donner Lake, and Downtown. I agree with strengthening policies on Town communication and
inclusiveness. Amendments to the Development Code should be further strengthened to protect
visual resources, tree preservation, etc.
Additional policies, such as height of buildings and architectural
design should be incorporated for the preservation of the historic district.
Visual and physical scenic resources such as views of the Truckee River, Donner Lake, Shallenberger
Ridge, and views of Donner Summit should be protected. The density and height of buildings
proposed in the Land Use Element for Gateway, Downtown, and Truckee River Corridor do not
support this goal
Comment noted.
Page 67
Item 7.1
36
Goal CC-2 Name:
Rolf Godon Affiliation: Truckee
Resident
The focus of this comment is Goal cc-2: Night Sky as per the public draft document being discussed
tonight. bb
1. Please refer to Truckee Municipal Code-- Title 18, Development Code section 18.30.060-- Exterior
Lighting and Night Sky.
2. The Town code enforcement department states to me that the Code as written only addresses
single bulb lights and does not include features such as “Festoon" lighting; also described as cafe
lighting or party lighting or big bulb garland lights. And, therefore they cannot enforce.
3. Case in point: b Lighting at Chinese Herb Shop complex. b Entire complex perimeter eves strung
with festoon lighting amounting to perhaps in the
neighborhood of 200 individual bulbs. b These strings of lights are on from dusk to dawn 365 days a
year and, in my opinion, violate several specially
stated elements of the Code.
4. Proposed language regarding CC- 2.2--Exterior lighting: b festoon lighting ( holiday lighting) is
allowed only during specified holidays, the dates of use before and after any specific holiday to be
specified. b Lighting to be turned off after 10:00pm. b Lighting must be LED or a comparable energy
saving type.
Staff recommends the incorporation of a new action to
explore regulating festoon and holiday lighting for residential
and/or non-residential uses as a means to reduce light
pollution.
Reference proposed new Action CC-
2.C.
37
General Comment
Name: Jennifer Bloomfield Affiliation:
Truckee Resident
In the Purpose of the Community Character Element the language states that future development will
be " through intentional choices that consider the impact on the community". I have not been able to
find policies in the 2040 plan which consider the impact on our community in a documentable way
nor have I been able to find any policies which inventory and protect our scenic, historic and
environmental resources.
The "intentional choices" language is a cross-reference to the
Land Use Element in how the 2040 General Plan will shape
Truckee's future. Impacts of the 2040 General Plan are
considered in the Draft Environmental Impact Report. Historic
resources are inventoried in the Town's Historic Preservation
Program. Scenic Resources are identified in Community
Character Element Figure CC-1. Natural resources are
identified in the February 2019 Existing Conditions Report.
38
CC-1.2 (Surrounding Natural Context)
Name: Alexis Ollar & Sophia Heidrich
Affiliation: MAP (Mountain Area Preservation)
This section is intended to ensure that the development of lowland areas shall contribute to and
enhance the quality of the Truckee townscape. Still, there are no action items associated with this.
How would this be accomplished?
See proposed policy language modifications identifed in
Community Character Comment #19 above. There are other
policies and actions that support this policy (e.g.-CC-3.1, CC-
3.2, CC-3.11, CC-3.A, CC-3.B). The Council would want to
consider if an additional action should be considered.
39
CC-1.E (Donner Lake District)
Name: Alexis Ollar & Sophia Heidrich
Affiliation: MAP (Mountain Area Preservation)
A Donner Lake overlay district should include specific height requirements
to maintain the scenic qualities of this unique area.
Height is determined by the underlying zoning district. No
changes to height limits are proposed with the 2040 General
Plan. The Council would need to discuss if an action should be
added to modify Donner Lake area height limits and the
applicability.
40
CC-1.9 (Minimization of Vegetation Disturbance)
Name: Alexis Ollar & Sophia Heidrich
Affiliation: MAP (Mountain Area Preservation)
Why not require the preservation of mature trees and native vegetation
rather than encouraging it?
The language is proposed as "encouraged" in recognition of its
applicability to sites where development is allowed. Tree
preservation requirements are included in Development Code
Section 18.30.155.
41
CC-1.B (Scenic Corridor Standards)
Name: Alexis Ollar & Sophia Heidrich
Affiliation: MAP (Mountain Area Preservation)
The scenic corridor buffer was established along 1-80 to preserve the
scenic qualities and character of this mountain community. Amending or
eliminating buffer requirements to facilitate new mixed-use projects is
contradictory to the purpose of this element and should not be included
in Truckee 2040.
Comment noted.
42
CC-3.5 (Spaces to Encourage Social Interaction)
Name: Alexis Ollar & Sophia Heidrich
Affiliation: MAP (Mountain Area Preservation)
How could the Town incentivize commercial uses that support community
interaction rather than encouraging it?
One method is flexibility in Development Code standards. For
example, Development Code Section 18.48.040.H exempts
having to provide up to 10 parking spaces for restaurants
adjacent to the Truckee River. Other incentives could be
created through new programs.
43
CC-3.16 (Underground Utilities)
Name: Alexis Ollar & Sophia Heidrich
Affiliation: MAP (Mountain Area Preservation)
Utility lines often degrade viewsheds rather than enhance them. This
should be incentivized, not encouraged.
The Council would want to decide if feasible incentives could
be created.
44
CC-6.2 (Inclusive Public Participation)
Name: Alexis Ollar & Sophia Heidrich
Affiliation: MAP (Mountain Area Preservation)
This Element emphasizes the importance of public participation and
inclusion as part of the decision-making process, yet that isn't being
prioritized as part of the General Plan update. There are numerous barriers
to participation, including that the General Plan resources are not
available in Spanish. Additionally, the Planning Commission and Town
Council joint working sessions have been held in quick succession, thus
making it difficult for community members to access and process the
information provided prior to the meetings. The remaining Truckee 2040
planning timeline seems arbitrary and contrary to this policy.
Comment noted.
Page 68
Item 7.1
45
CC-8.6 (Protection of Views) Name: Alexis
Ollar & Sophia Heidrich Affiliation: MAP
(Mountain Area Preservation)
Again, building heights for new development should be complementary
to other existing infrastructure to maintain the scenic qualities of Donner
Pass Road.
No changes to height limits are being proposed with the 2040
General Plan.
46
General Comments: Name:
Alexis Ollar & Sophia Heidrich Affiliation: MAP
(Mountain Area Preservation)
The actions in this plan are inconsistent with the community character outlined in this
Element—increased density without mitigating associated impacts (traffic, parking, safety, emissions,
etc.), lack of assurances for local/ workforce/ affordable housing, unnecessary commercial
development, and inadequate open space and natural resource protections. Height requirements
should be implemented to ensure that building heights are consistent with adjacent developments
and do not degrade viewsheds, especially in areas with unparalleled scenic qualities, like the Gateway
Area and Donner Lake.
The overview discusses the importance of preserving open space to
maintain community character, but there are no policies/ action items to
ensure this occurs.
This Element references the importance of responding to the climate
challenges of the mountains and enhancing connectivity but doesn't
include policies/ action items to address these needs. Thank
you, Council and Commission, for considering our comments. We appreciate
your service and dedication to this vital community planning effort. If you have any
questions regarding our comments please feel free to reach out.
Comment noted.
47
General Comment Name: Sarah
Green; Trinkie Watson
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
The General Plan needs to prioritize our character (small-town
feel, historical features, scenic viewsheds, and natural resources), instead of
prioritizing growth and development.
Increased densities should be allowed only where it
provides for sufficient affordable, workforce housing.
Building height should be limited to three stories as
overwhelming community input has recommended. Our community character is
negatively impacted by allowing building heights taller than three stories.
Two and three-story buildings must be set back from the
road so as to not create shading and a tunnel - like feel.
Scenic Corridor Standards should not be reduced to allow for
high density development in Gateway, Donner Lake, and Downtown.
Amendments to the Development Code should be strengthened
to protect visual resources, tree preservation, etc.
Additional policies, such as height of buildings and
architectural design should be incorporated for the preservation of the
historic district.
Visual and physical scenic resources such as views of the
Truckee River, Donner Lake, Shallenberger Ridge, and views of the summit should
be protected. The density and height of
buildings proposed the Land Use Element for Gateway, Downtown, and Truckee
River Corridor do not support this goal.
Comment noted.
48
CC-1.9 & CC-1.C Name:
Rolf Godon Affiliation:
MAP (Mountain Area Preservation)
The word, "encourage" in the text has little power. There is no action or intent in it, The verbiage
should be replaced with something like; "Preserve trees
and native vegetation, etc".
Case in point: Truckee Springs recently bought and preserved as open space. Now a large asphalt
parking lot is being built, destroying as " sage brush"
field. Obviously maximizing vegetation disturbance. Additionally, the existence of a large asphalt area
adds to heating of the environment as well as
continues our dependence on fossil fuels. It encourages car use and increases traffic on a quiet
residential street. Thus it flies in the face of a number of
General Plan items. I find it to be a real " head scratcher" in that we want people to use cars less so
we build large access parking lots so they can park their
cars to ride their bikes or walk ,etc. Thus, a transit issue is raised. An alternative might have been to
leave the open space in tact and have cars park in the
massive rail yard parking lot and begin their recreation from that point, and/or provide shuttle
service.
Once again, the " horse has left the barn" in this case. And it magnifies the need for strong and clear
General Plan statements.
Upon
Comment noted. Also see response to Comment #40.
Page 69
Item 7.1
49
CC-1.9 & CC-1.C Name:
Ruth Jackson Hall
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
In your consideration tonight of the Community Character element, I hope you will consider policy
that ensures the preservation of the two Truckee assets most highly prized by residents and tourists
alike: our spectacular natural environment and our historic and authentic downtown. The public input
received by the Town over the course of the current 4 -year General Plan process bears these values
out, as does the importance placed on these attributes in our original General Plan. One useful way to
think about policy might be to consider how we can avoid seeing the design and construction of
downtown buildings that do not meet pubic values and expectations: The Artists Lofts: This stripped
down, modular, development along with its height, and mass degrades the historic environment that
surrounds it and the beauty of the Mt. Rose vista. The Avery Hotel: This project was proposed for the
historic district and was rejected by the public for its density, mass, height and its incompatibility with
surrounding viewsheds.
Jibboom Street Residences: The density, mass and height of the proposed designs for this historic
street, have elicited ongoing concern from the public. As designed, the project overwhelms adjacent
buildings, including the historic jail and the thoughtfully designed commercial and office buildings to
the west. The height and modern aspect of this development negatively affect the viewshed and
detract from the historic and historic McGlashan neighborhood behind it.
Please consider the vital role that downtown plays in Truckee pride, economic sustainability, and as
the crown jewel in the center of a magnificent landscape. The following excerpt from a recent article
in the Sierra Sun provides some background.
History: What Makes Truckee An Historic Town, Heidi Sproat, August 14, 2022, Sierra Sun.
In its own 2200131- 4 Visitor Profile Study, Truckee Donner Chamber of Commerce tabulated results
of inquiries about the reasons visitors come to Truckee. Seventy-two percent of visitors come
because of the historic districts / downtown, behind only scenic beauty at 87%. Further, a 2017 town
manager executive search report attested that Truckee's economy is driven by tourism. The report
states that Truckee shares a " passion for ... the preservation of Truckee's small town character and
authenticity," and the community is dedicated to protecting its historic roots and authentic mountain
town lifestyle."
Comment noted.
50
Policy CC 6.5 Name: April
Cole Affiliation: Truckee
Resident
The guiding principles of this element speak to the desire to strengthen the sense of community in
Truckee and strengthen the diverse social fabric of
our community. This element’s introduction provides the rationale for taking actions and providing
infrastructure that will bring people together, with a
particular focus on the development of robust community services for underrepresented and
marginalized groups.
Libraries are a civic institution of critical importance in supporting disadvantaged community
members (e.g. full and free digital access, access to critical
information sources, places for community dialogue and learning, etc.). Properly-sized, libraries are
also prime connection centers for all in our
community to gather and interact, fostering our collective health and well-being.
Policy CC 6.5 briefly mentions a library among many other community amenities to support. Because
the vision for a new library is so well established
and so many community members and community resources are being devoted to seeing the vision
realized, we believe this policy should be
strengthened with the following language.
"In particular, continue to support the Friends of the Library and Nevada County as the Town works in
partnership to develop a new, appropriately sized
and modern regional library to meet the needs of the community now and in the future."
Staff recommends maintaining the language as proposed; the
additional language is more specific than what would normally
be included in a policy about a variety of support services--
which already identifies a library. The highlighting of the library
is included with other changes identifed in Community
Character Comment #51.
51
Action CC 6.E Name: April
Cole Affiliation: Truckee
Resident
Also, please add Action CC-6.E to page 3- 23 as follows. If a separate action is not desired, please
incorporate this language into Action CC-6D.
Work closely with Nevada County, Friends of the Library and other local partners to fulfill the vision of
a vibrant, appropriately-sized, and
strategically located, 21st century regional library for Truckee.
Responsibility: Assistant to the Town Manager, Town Manager and Public Works staff
Time Frame: On-Going
Staff recommends adding a new action, "Continue to
collaborate with Nevada County and local partners, such as
Friends of the Truckee Library, to support the development of
a modern library for Truckee."
Add new action CC-6.E for library
collaboration.
Page 70
Item 7.1
Comment
Number Action, Name, Affiliation Public Comment Staff Response Recommended Changes?
1
General Comment: Mobility
Name: Dan Cockrum
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
The proposed connection of Tahoe Donner and downtown Truckee with the Pioneer Trail and Bridge
Street Extension is a receipt for unintended consequences. There are other proposal that make far
more sense in regard to emergency evacuation of THD ( direct connection to the Pioneer
development or connection to middle school area, both of which have direct connection to Hwy 89).
Dumping THD traffic into downtown at the High Street/ Jibboom Street intersection over burdens an
already existing nightmare. THD residents are pressuring the town for a more direct daily route to
downtown without thought of the impacts on downtown residential neighborhoods. Already the
impacts are felt from the completion of East Jibboom St. and the increased traffic through High St.
and Keiser. Ave to avoid downtown traffic and reach the Coburn Crossing road abound.
Comment noted.
2
Action: M-1.A
Name: Jennifer Bloomfield
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
The Tahoe Truckee Unified School District and the Rec Center before and after school programs
could benefit from ride sharing programs.
Comment noted.
3
Action: M-1.B
Name: Jennifer Bloomfield
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
Parking spaces should not be unbundled from residential units. Unbundled parking spaces from
residential units is inconsistent with workforce housing.
Comment noted. Staff recommend maintaining the current language.
Unbundled parking promotes alternative transportation options and
helps lower the construction costs and affordability of residential
units.
4
Action: M-1.C
Name: Jennifer Bloomfield
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
Rideshare programs with Reno, NV should be expanded.Comment noted.
5
Action: M-8.A
Name: Jennifer Bloomfield
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
A Regional Transportation Plan should include a coordination of transportation resources available
for emergency evacuations.
Emergency Evacuation is addressed through the Town's 2022
Emergency Operations Plan.
6
General Comment
Name: Heather Rankow
Affiliation: Developer's Connection
I want to initially thank you for taking the time to meet for a joint session last night. I was
unfortunately unable to attend, but did watch the recording today. I wanted to echo some of the
Commissioner’ s concern and open dialogue at the end of the meeting regarding the format and
process of the joint meetings and topic matter. It is concerning that
there is not more dialogue between the commission and the council, especially at this time when we
are reviewing our Town’ s new General Plan. As I’m sure everyone of you has taken the time to
review all the general plan documents over the past couple years, I feel that these joint meetings are
the opportunity to have the dialogue, to discuss the tough questions/ topics/ policies in an open and
public forum. GPAC has done a lot of heavy lifting and there has been many discussions there, but
THIS is now the time for Council the Commission to have those questions/ discussions…instead of a
pushing aside to meet a timeline however I do appreciate short meetings In my opinion moving
forward, I would think that maybe the Council and/ or Commissioner’ s could provide advice to the
agenda and timing for the agenda so that there is an appropriate amount of time to allow for these
discussions, and in the future maybe accommodating for more time in order to allow for this. Please
excuse me if I am missing the mark here, but if now is NOT the time to do this…when is it? Not to
specifically get into the weeds, I wanted to bring to light a specific policy point in the General plan
that greatly affects mixed use in downtown, and specifically in the current General Plan removes
essentially any infill mixed use housing in the Downtown area or any infill eligible areas. Please see
18.58.140. D, specifically regarding Maximum Density. I think this is one policy that can bring infill to
the Town of Truckee. I really hope that this policy can be discussed amongst all of you as one we
HIGHLY need to consider modifying. 4 units per acre in the year of 2022 is not an appropriate mixed
use density, when we’re looking for infill.
Development Code Section 18.58.140.D would be amended to reflect
any adopted Land Use Designation changes. This includes mixed-use
land use designations. The majority of mixed-use land use
designations being considered with the 2040 General Plan have a
minimum of 6 dwelling units per acre.
Mobility Element
Page 71
Item 7.1
7
General Comment: Mobility
Name: Jim Colbert
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
I am responding to Item 7 Review of June 2022 Draft 2040 General Plan Land Use Element,
Safety and Noise Element and June 2022 Draft Downtown Truckee Plan. My principal interest is the
section Mobility Element of the Truckee 2040 Draft Plan. I have read most of the plan but will
comment principally on road speed in Tahoe Donner. I am a resident of Tahoe Donner for about ten
years now and have seen the speed of cars increase significantly. When possible, I either walk or ride
my bike ( now electric) to the various Tahoe Donner facilities, into Town Center and Donner Lake.
Since Covid, I have noticed an increase in auto traffic and more vehicles exceeding the speed limit. If
you drive the speed limit on Northwoods Blvd you will have a line of cars behind you in no time. Since
Covid, I have also noticed many more people walking and cycling on Northwoods' Blvd and
adjacent residential streets. So please consider Northwoods Blvd in your Mobility Element review.
Some suggesting for safety and traffic calming on Northwoods Blvd might be. One, widen the bike
lanes and maybe include some protection from the main road so Northwoods is more family friendly.
Consider class four bike lanes. Second, increase the
number of speed signs and periodically enforce the speed laws. Three consider small round abouts or
traffic circles to slow traffic or some sort of bump outs to help reduce speed. Fourth, more stop signs
along Northwoods like the three ways at Northwoods and Northwoods. Fifth, install radar control to
ticket speeders. The last is to implement a process to ensure that whatever is done is enforced. I am
happy to see that the plan includes more bike lanes especially in the Town Center area and access to
Donner Lake as well as the third exit from Tahoe Donner. Thank you for all the time and effort you
have put in to produce the plan.
Comment noted.
8
General Comment: Mobility
Name: Kathy Echols Affiliation:
Truckee Resident
Draft Mobility Element: Purpose: State law also requires that the element contain data
and policies related to the circulation and distribution of water, sewage, storm drainage, other public
utilities. These components are not included here and instead are incorporated into the Land Use
Element." All of the above - mentioned state requirements are very important and should have their
own policy section, rather than be only incorporated into the Land Use Element. The availability of
water for the proposed growth needs to be thoroughly independently researched and a policy
written to address the problem of overdevelopment and its affect on groundwater availability, water
distribution, etc. I also am in favor of having the current sewage capacity be a factor in development
rather than increasing sewage capacity to meet the needs of overdevelopment. Comments on Key
Policy Questions: 2. Highway 267 ( Bypass) widening: It is important to keep the Bypass to a single
travel lane. I do not agree with the widening of the section near hwy 80 I am opposed to a second
Bypass bridge! This is not in alignment with other policies about keeping roads to one lane in each
direction. Even the existing bridge is counter to our goal of town character and unobstructed
viewsheds. 3 Yes, policies should be made to address wintertime congestion conditions. Perhaps
there could be a realignment of lanes during peak ski traffic to accommodate an " express bus lane"
to incentivize public transit to the ski resorts. 4. Are there other available strategies for reducing auto
dependency and if so, what do they look like? Convenient transit is most important. Bike/walking
trails are very important, but it is important to remember that our climate is not conducive to
walking and biking for many months during the winter.
5. What are the tradeoffs of the Pioneer Trail and Bridge Street Extension? This extension would just
bring more traffic into the downtown core.
Comment noted. The Council and Commission supported
maintaining Highway 276 at two lanes at their July 19th joint study
session. Other strategies for reducing auto dependency include Goal
M-1 and the policies and actions to support this goal, Goal M-3,
Policy M-3.7 and Policy M-5.4. Pioneer Trail is a "planned"
improvement in the Mobility Element. Ultimately the Council is
tasked with making decisions about which "planned" improvements
to pursue or not pursue based on a variety of factors including
funding, need, Council priorities, etc.
Page 72
Item 7.1
9
General Comment: Mobility
Name: Laura Lindgren Affiliation:
Truckee Resident
I write to provide input on the Mobility Element of the Truckee 2040 Draft Plan (“Draft”),
and in particular to request that Northwoods Blvd. be included in the plan.
The goals of the Mobility Element include a “well-connected, accessible, equitable,
multi-modal transportation system” that prioritizes “non-automobile transportation” and
a focus on “solutions and strategies that contemplate safety, convenience,
attractiveness and accessibility to the end user.” The Draft notes that mobility can be
enhanced with safety improvements (sidewalks, roundabouts, and crosswalks” and by
making “commuting by non-auto modes easier,” among other suggestions.
As noted in the draft, Northwoods Blvd. provides loop access to the entire Tahoe
Donner neighborhood (with over 6000 housing units and nearly 1/3 of total housing in
our Town, and trails and ski operations open to the public) and is a major collector road
with average daily traffic of over 18,000 vehicles. Reducing traffic flow by making
bicycle and pedestrian usage safer and easier should be an important consideration in
the Draft, yet it does not contain any such enhancements or improvements for
Northwoods Blvd. Issues and Opportunities to Further the Goals of the Mobility Element
Tahoe Donner is a part of Truckee where active transportation presents a huge
opportunity for decreasing vehicular traffic and increasing the number of people who
walk and bike for short trips. However, unless people feel safe walking or biking, they
will continue to use their vehicles as the primary mode of transportation.
Many of the side streets in this neighborhood are low-speed, low-volume and ideal for
walking and biking (and indeed are often used for both). However, there is one major
arterial connecting most streets in the neighborhood, Northwoods Boulevard, that stops
many people from walking and biking to key amenities and trails, to other areas of Town
or to the Trout Creek Trail that connects to downtown Truckee.
There are a few things, most relatively low cost, that would significantly enhance the
safety, walkability and bikeability, of the neighborhood, and enhance this area of
Truckee:(CONTINUED BELOW...)
10
General Comment: Mobility Name:
Laura Lindgren
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
...(CONTINUED) Buffered bike lanes between the corners of Donner Pass Road and Northwoods
and Northwoods and Lausanne Way
High Visibility Cross walks in heavily used areas, including the areas noted in the
draft report as higher crash areas:
o Northwoods at the entrance to the Trout Creek Trail
o Northwoods and Lausanne Way
o Northwoods and Access to the Nature Loop Trail adjacent to the
Northwoods Clubhouse parking lot
o Northwoods at Chamonix
o Northwoods at Muhlebach
o Northwoods at Hansel
o Northwoods at Sierra Glen
Traffic Calming Islands:
o Entrance to Tahoe Donner between Truckee Trails Trailhead parking lot
and Lausanne Way
o Northwoods and Bern Drive
o Northwoods and access to Nature loop trial
o Northwoods and Fjord
These ideas are explained in more detail in the attached Addendum.
Conclusion
Thank you for your consideration of these important issues. We believe that including
Northwoods Blvd in the Mobility Element planning will greatly improve the lives of
Truckee residents and significantly further the goals of Truckee’s Mobility planning.
11
M-3.12 Rail Services
Name: Leigh Chavez Affiliation:
Placer County
Placer County would like to collaborate and participate with the Town of Truckee in
communications with Amtrak to make visiting the Tahoe- Truckee area more efficient and
less impactful on the roadways.
Comment noted.
12
M-3.7 Name:
Leigh Chavez Affiliation: Placer
County
The Town of Truckee is a valued and critical partner in the effort to implement the Resort
Triangle Transportation Plan ( RTTP). This plan includes improvements in key areas to meet
regional transportation goals. Many of the approved strategies in the RTTP require
coordination between Placer County and the Town of Truckee for effective
implementation. This includes the adaptive corridor management aspects of the RTTP
which consist of installation of intersection and corridor improvements relative to transit
priority. Ultimately, the plan calls for the installation of reversible bus only lanes along the
two major state highways SR89 and 267. ( As identified in M-3.7)
Comment noted.
The commenter makes several suggested improvements to
Northwoods Boulevard and asks that the mobility element be
updated to include them. Regarding the buffered bike lanes, the
Town has since striped such bike lanes along the face of Northwoods
Boulevard. There is also a suggestion for high visibility crosswalks and
traffic calming islands. The mobility element does address traffic
calming with action M-2.A, "to determine which roadways are
suitable for implementing reduced vehicle lane width, traffic calming
measures, or expanded bike capacity to more safely accommodate
pedestrians and bicyclists" as part of an update to the Trails and
Bikeways Mater Plan. The Trails and Bikeways Master Plan Update
would allow a more focused review, analysis, and outreach effort
related to traffic calming and pedestrian and bicycle improvements,
as well as an evaluation of improvement priorities for the Town as a
whole. However, staff does not recommend using the General Plan
as a method to prioritize specific improvements for specific areas.
Page 73
Item 7.1
13
Figure M-1 - Proposed roundabout at Brockway Rd and SR267
Name: Leigh Chavez Affiliation:
Placer County
The traffic control choice of roundabouts on these corridors identified for transit priority
should be further analysed consistent with the above comment. Placer County
recommends changing to intersection improvements with the potential for queue
jump/transit lanes and transit priority infrastructure/systems.
Roundabouts provide many benefits over traffic signals, including
increased safety, reduced delay (especially during off-peak hours),
improved aesthetics, and lower maintenance costs. As a result, we
recommend maintaining the roundabout at SR 267/Brockway in the
General Plan. However, the Town is open to exploring ways to
accommodate and prioritize transit through the roundabout in the
future when a transit priority project is pursued by Placer County.
14
Figure M-1 / Table M-2
Name: Leigh Chavez Affiliation:
Placer County
Road widening from Brockway Summit to the Placer County line should be further
assessed. Any pavement width should be dedicated to additional transit lanes and not
to increasing vehicle capacity in alignment with goals presented in other sections of the
draft General Plan including M-5.6, M-5.8 and M-8.D. These goals look to maintain two
Page 2 travel lanes and generally oppose development that would necessitate widening of
SR267. Widening of this section of roadway could preclude the ability to implement transit
lanes and would be in opposition to VMT reduction goals.
The widening of SR 267 within Placer County was identified to meet
Placer County's adopted LOS standards. However, the RTTP
recommends the inclusion of transit lanes in lieu of widening. Staff
recommends revising the Mobility Element to recognize that the
wideningn of SR 267 in Placer County will need to be evaluated in
consultation with RTTP and other adopted policies.
15
M-4.13 / M-4. G - Roundabouts
Name: Leigh Chavez Affiliation:
Placer County
See comments above relative to transit priority. Where transit priority is anticipated (i.e.
along transit routes that encounter high congestion events), consider transit implications
during the decision- making process for traffic control of intersections.
See above response to Comment #14.
16
General Comment: Truckee Airport
Name: Leigh Chavez Affiliation:
Placer County
The plan includes a brief mention of the airport in the mobility section, but current
discussions of expansion and increases in use, could have a significant impact on
circulation/ mobility for the area including Truckee and Placer County roadways ( M-8.3).
Placer County recommends enhancing language in goals more specific to reduction in
these impacts.
Staff proposes revising M-8.3 as follows: "M-8.3 Adequate Ground
Transportation for the Airport. Work with the Truckee Tahoe
Airport to provide for adequate ground access to the airport that
also minimizes impacts to the surrounding roadway system by
encouraging alternative modes such as bicycles and transit."
Update M-8.3 with the revised
language.
17
General Comment: Parking Name:
Leigh Chavez Affiliation: Placer
County
Placer County is in the process of implementing the Parking Management program as
described in the RTTP. The County encourages coordination between our two agencies
to provide consistency in approach as feasible as we move forward. Placer County
invites the Town to be a part of the process and project delivery team as the effort moves
forward. Additionally, Placer County encourages any parking program improvements for
the Town to include Placer coordination and include assessment of regional goals and
programs.
Comment noted. Town staff is supportive of coordination with Placer
County related to parking management and all transportation-
related issues.
18
Action: M-2.A
Name: Rob McCray
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
My home is in Tahoe Donner at 15030 Wolfgang Rd. This is about 5 miles from downtown Truckee via
Northwoods Blvd and the Trout Creek Trail. Most Tahoe Donner homes are closer than mine to
downtown and we have an opportunity to substitute bicycles for many car trips. The problem, is that
while the LAST MILE from Northwoods to Bridge Street has been completed, I and many other Tahoe
Donner residents have several dangerous miles of Northwoods Blvd to navigate. For that reason few
will bike to town other than for exercise.
Action requested: Add Northwoods Blvd to the Mobility Element and use yours and community
expertise to design affordable safety and confidence building improvements. These will encourage
more riding generally and specifically make a trip to town for entertainment a realistic alternative for
many people. With many people buying E-assist bikes, which make the ride home after lunch more
enjoyable, this is the right
time to act.
The General Plan has many policies and actions to improve bicycle
facilities townwide. In particular, M-2.A includes and update to the
Trails and Bikeways Mater Plan, which will include a significant
outreach effort as well as an evaluation of priorities related to
various infrastructure improvements.
19
Goal: 6.1 Name: Rolf
Gordon Affiliation: Truckee
Resident
A stated goal is to reduce use of cars in various ways. A laudable goal. A proposed second bypass flies
directly in the face of what the community is wanting to do. It is designed to allow for more traffic in
and through the area. Seems like a direct conflict. Los Angeles built more and wider freeways which
only increased traffic and congestion. We have got to move away from the great American GROWTH
model. We see it over and over and over
that growth does not equate to quality of life and is, in fact, in direct opposition to that. Our
obsession with the growth cycle is not sustainable ( as we see increasingly here in our community).
Therefore, in order to achieve a masterful general plan update, we must prioritize quality of life,
sustainability, and balance with nature over growth. In numerous ways these elements are reflected
in many of our ideas for our future. Thus, even the idea of a second bypass is a true head - scratcher.
Comment noted.
20
General Comment: 6.1
Name: Rolf Gordon Affiliation:
Truckee Resident
Is this for real. The goal is to reduce use of private vehicles; laudable. And there is the proposal to
build a second bypass to allow for significant traffic increases. A real head scratcher. This points to a
core problem. The Great American idea that GROWTH equates to better quality of life. And, he who
dies with the most toys wins. Los Angeles invested mightily in freeways to move traffic and found
that more freeways equates to more traffic congestion. Thus the core problem. We find over and
over and over that growth is not correlated with quality of life. Yet we are addicted to it. We cannot
achieve a quality general plan update till we shift the filters through which we look. this would be
planning in harmony with nature and restricting growth to that which is truly sustainable, There is a
huge disconnect between what the community wants and what our decision makers are
doing. A second bypass which leads to a two lane road makes absolutely no sense and four lanes all
the way to the lake ain't gonna happen.
Comment noted.
Page 74
Item 7.1
21
Policy: Mobility and Climate
Name: Ruth Jackson Hall Affiliation:
Truckee Resident
Dear Council Members and Commissioners: It is undeniable that many issues we face today are
being exacerbated by unsustainable growth, including issues of Mobility and Climate Change.
Truckee already feels outgrown and crowded much of the year. Our infrastructure cannot continue
to be modified and stretched without losing the very things we came here for --a small town with
character, surrounded by magnificent natural beauty. Key Policy Questions in today's packet: Policy
Question 2. Widening the 267 River bypass. This is a bad idea. It was extremely controversial when
the current bridge was originally proposed, for the blight it brought to a beautiful view shed. It
should not now be doubled in size for the convenience of travelers on a few impacted days of the
year. Our community has shown that we value our small town feel by preserving our two lane
highways on 89N, 89S, Highway 267, and Donner Pass Road. Adding lanes to this most visible and
very short stretch of road is of negligible value and is not a reflection of what we value as a Town.
Please leave it two lanes. Policy Question 5. Pioneer Trail and Bridge Street Extension. I advise
against paving this route as a permanent vehicle connector to downtown. As a long time resident of
downtown on High Street, I have seen the negative impacts of ever increasing traffic on safety,
parking, and congestion in the downtown commercial and residential neighborhoods. Shortcuts
through residential neighborhoods create hazards for children playing outside and spinouts are
frequent in snowy weather. A road from Tahoe Donner would empty into the congested and
dangerous Bridge Street, Jibboom Street, Truckee Way intersection -- a terrible idea. (CONTINUED
BELOW....)
22
Policy: Mobility and Climate
Name: Ruth Jackson Hall Affiliation:
Truckee Resident
...(CONTINUED)... Currently, bikers, strollers and hikers enjoy this trail in the peace of nature. It is a
walkable route from Tahoe Donner to downtown and aligns with Town climate and mobility goals. It
gets people out of cars. A paved road will bring a stream of cars into downtown, degrading the
historic charm we have been working to protect. This proposal runs counter to ongoing
conversations about improving walkability and eliminating the carbon - spewing lines of cars circling
Jibboom and Commercial Row trying to find parking. Would it be possible to make minor adaptations
to the unpaved trail to be used as a one-way route only during an evacuation? Also, I usually hear
that there are only two ways out of Tahoe Donner: Northwoods Blvd., and Alder Creek, isn't there a
shortcut, via Bullpine, that brings you to the PUD/ DPR. Perhaps this could be used as a one-way in
case of an emergency.
23
Goal: Table M-2 Name:
Wendy Nevins Affiliation:
Truckee Resident
Table M-2 – SR 89N/ Rainbow – Turning movements/ counts likely do not support a southbound left
turn as most users access Prosser Lakeview from the north on the northern Rainbow intersection.
Funding and efforts for improvements would be better spent to install a right turn lane for
northbound SR89 onto the southern Rainbow intersection.
This improvement is currently identified in the adopted Traffic
Impact Fee Program but does not need to be specifically identified in
the General Plan mobility element. Staff recommends removing it
and determining if it is still warranted as a part of the next Traffic
Impact Fee program update.
Remove SR 89N/Rainbow
improvement from Table M-2
24
General Comment
Name: Steven Benton Affiliation:
Truckee Resident
Hi,
I would like to comment on bike safety in Truckee and the Trout Creek Trail in particular. First, I am
grateful for the planning in place and the projects accomplished to date.
The Trout Creek Trail is a wonderful addition. It allows me to cycle to downtown Truckee and beyond
from my home in Tahoe Donner and avoid the high
speed, steep descent on Northwoods Blvd. Thanks for making it happen. That said, mixing bicycles
and pedestrians is problematic. Most pedestrians on the trail are polite and observant, but some are
not. They might be wearing earphones and not hear your voice or bell alerting them to your
presence, they might be walking three or four abreast and talking and thus also not be aware of
oncoming cyclists, or have dogs on extendable leashes, which put my financial advisor in the ICU
after his bike was wrapped up in one a few years ago in another city. Lastly, what rules do we have
about motorized e-bikes? Some of these now are capable of 30 mph or more without any pedaling
input. These are "bike racing speeds" which most of us are not physically or athletically equipped to
handle. The potential for serious injury is directly proportional to speed. Thanks for considering my
concerns.
Comment noted.
See response to Comment #9.
Page 75
Item 7.1
Comment
Number Action, Name, Affiliation Public Comment Staff Response Recommend Changes?
1
Action: H-3
Name: Ruth Cross
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
The Town of Truckee Housing Element 2019-2027, H-3, states that the town provide a range of
housing opportunities for residents with special needs,
including the elderly, people with disabilities, single parent households, and the homeless...The town
is also required by the State to address housing needs
for the homeless as a targeted population. The town's actions so far have been to support non-
profits in the provision of services in downtown Truckee at the Methodist Church, by granting zoning
permits, and providing housing for the homeless at the Artist Lofts, Cold Stream, and the new
housing by the freeway. I am very happy to note that about 30 homeless have been housed out of
approximately 50 in the area. The properties are well managed and any issues are quickly dealt with.
There are also requirements for them to be housed. The problem lies with the homeless not
qualified to be housed. The have no place to go, so they hang out and cause problems both
downtown and around the properties where the homeless are housed. There are numerous rumors
going around which the staff at the resource center investigates work closely with the police to
identify rumors from facts. There is no place for them to go except the Church which has limited
hours due to funding. Cathy Foley has spent many hours trying to find a location, but has had no luck
in identifying alternative sites that are compatible with surrounding uses. I would like to encourage
you to update the General Plan with the provision that the town take leadership in identifying
alternative sites for homeless housing and services that are compatible with surrounding uses, and
where there can be caseworkers and non-profit services providing support. There is funding
available NOW for the creation of a comprehensive facility. In my mind, it could be a campsite that
has showers, toilets and space for a dining area and that can be added onto as time goes by. A site
where their limited possessions can be protected, can hang out and have internet. It has to be on a
bus route. There are many successful projects in our state. According to Placer County, "creating
homeless facilities does not bring more homeless to our area. "Danielle says. "the only way to cure
homelessness is to provide housing. The issue is not going away.
The Council would need to consider if there is interest in the Town
taking on a new/different role with what are primarily county
services.
2
General Comment: Housing Element
Name: Ruth Jackson Hall
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
Consider keeping housing density at a conservative level, taking into account new government
mandates affecting density, parking and our undeveloped transit system. Only provide additional
density bonuses if the developer is making a substantial dent in truly affordable workforce housing
units. It is important that the Town Housing Department take a leadership role and document action
in the GPU to seek permanent sites for homeless housing and services. There is grant funding
available through the State and County for this purpose. For instance, Placer County recently
purchased an old motel in Kings Beach for homeless housing.
Comment noted.
3
General Comment: Housing Element
Name: Jan Holan Affiliation:
President, Truckee River Legacy Foundation
To align zoning with the Downtown River Revitalization Strategy in the draft Land Use element a
Riverfront Mixed Use zoning was created and applied to much of West River Street. Please request
Town Staff to apply this zoning to undeveloped and industrial parcels on East River St. The current
zoning of Downtown Residential Housing (DRH-24) is unlikely to encourage redevelopment of the
industrial riverfront parcels while providing public access and revitalization of the riverfront. It is
both difficult and inappropriate to build to this density because of the constraints of the floodplain,
dead-end East River Street and the airport overflight zone. The 2040 General Plan is the appropriate
time to make this change since some of the housing density which is unlikely to be built to address
our housing challenges can be shifted to other downtown parcels which have already been
considered for increased housing density.
The Council and Commission discussed East River Street at their July
12, 2022 joint session and supported the incorporation of a new
action to study the zoning of high density residential in consideration
of terrain and constraints.
Reference new action LU-1.D
Housing Element
Page 76
Item 7.1
Comment
Number Action, Name, Affiliation Public Comment Staff Response Recommended Changes?
1
ED-1.6
Name: Ruth Miller
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
Does this include allowing commercial uses from residential-zoned areas? Could I post a sign by my
house and start having retail hours out of my garage? Could I prepare food from my kitchen? I hope
the answer to at least some of these are yes, and want to see much more specificity on this item.
Yes, but within the currently adopted regulations for home
occupations.
2
ED-2
Name: Ruth Miller
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
This would be a great place to evaluate the airport's benefits to Truckee. Is that a sector we want to
see expand? Would some other use with that land better benefit Truckee?
Comment noted. The Town does not have land use authority over the
majority of airport-owned land.
3
ED-3.2
Name: Ruth Miller
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
This one is very exciting, but could go in lots of different directions. Does this mean we're going to
implement demand-based pricing, or turn people away?
The comment appears to be about ED 3.1. Action ED-3.A would be the
process to define specifics.
4
ED-3
Name: Ruth Miller
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
suggestion #1: I was on Orcas Island last weekend, and stumbled upon this very cool housing finance
project. Essentially, the community is raising funds to give locals low interest loans to buy local
housing. We've got some well heeled and hopefully generous people in Truckee, can we put it to
them to help fix this housing situation (and make a little interest)?
Staff recommends adding a new policy under ED-3, "Work with
community partners, including Tahoe Truckee Community
Foundation, to explore the creation of privately-funded workforce
housing programs, such as a housing land trust or community lending
program."Reference new policy ED-3.7.
5
ED-5.5
Name: Ruth Miller
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
Include public bathrooms. And maybe even showers for through hikers?Staff recommends maintaining the policy as proposed. The Council has
the ability to consider what types of amenities they support through
the CIP budgeting process.
6
ED-5.6
Name: Ruth Miller
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
I hope this includes the AT&T buildings downtown!
Comment noted.
7
General Comment Name: Kathy
Echols Affiliation: Truckee Resident
I agree with monitoring and limiting short-term rentals.
I support the preserving the eclectic nature of the Downtown. This would include less height and
density than is proposed in the Land Use Element.
Key Question # 2: Incentives aimed at creating high-wage year-round employment opportunities
would help locals afford the high price of housing, but the current amount of commercial business,
plus the proposed amount of new commercial business will still require workers at lower income
employment. The amount of affordable housing for these jobs will be increased.
Key Question # 3: To create a vibrate local community, the balance needs to be shifted to the needs
of the local community when deciding on tourism related development. Sustainable tourism is more
than educating the tourists about trail etiquette. Sustainable tourism includes making decisions that
support a reasonable amount of tourism that does not negatively affect the local population.
Key Question # 4: River Revitalization Plan. More policies should added to create incentives to move
industrial off the river.
The proposed 2040 land use plan and map are intended to create a
balance of jobs and housing. Additional work on increasing housing
supply that is affordable to local workers is targeted with actions such
as Land Use Action LU-2.A-Workforce Housing Strategy and LU-2.B-
Town of Truckee Density Bonus. "Tourism related development" could
also provide services, goods or housing to meet full-time resident
needs. Action ED-3.A which calls for the creation of a sustainable
tourism program is targeted to be an effective tool for managing
Truckee's popularity and the associated impacts. Land Use Action LU 9-
A calls for the preparation of a study, including economic analaysis, to
identify incetives for industrial relocation off the Truckee River. Staff
believes this action encompasses the future work needed to
implement the River Revitaization Strategy.
8
General Comment Name: Jennifer
Bloomfield Affiliation: Truckee Resident
In the Expansion of Key Economic Sectors the language calls for supporting businesses that draw on
Truckee's natural assets. Truckee's natural assets are what brings people here who become year
round residents and bring our visitors. Our economy's continued success is dependent upon keeping
our natural assets.Comment noted.
9
General Comment Name: Jennifer
Bloomfield Affiliation: Truckee Resident
I am concerned that a Social Impact Assessment has not been performed as part of the General Plan
Update process. The Truckee Community is nervous about the " changes" they have been seeing. An
unhappy community is not one new people and new businesses will want to be part of.
General Plan's are not legally required to conduct Social Impact
Assessments and the 2040 Update did not inlcude this as part of the
work task.
10
ED-1.D (New Office Space)
Name: Alexis Ollar & Sophia Heidrich
Affiliation: MAP (Mountain Area Preservation)
According to the 2020 BAE Market Study, local real estate brokers indicate
that office spaces under 1,000 sf are in the highest demand. Many
Truckee office spaces available for lease are more considerable in size,
between 1,600 and 6,000 sf. Subdividing or reconfiguring larger office
spaces is challenging because the utility systems are not designed to
accommodate separate meters, and improvements are cost prohibitive.
According to real estate brokers, the quality of these spaces is also
lacking. Why not create a program that supports and funds the
redevelopment of large offices into more desirable spaces? If small offices
are in high demand, they will be built without an incentive program based
on market needs. Redevelopment of existing infrastructure would be
better utilization of funds and programming.
Staff recommends modifying Action ED 1.D to include redevelopment
of existing larger office spaces into smaller office spaces.
Update ED 1.D to reflect revised
language
Economic Development
Page 77
Item 7.1
11
ED-1.E (Healthcare Opportunities)
Name: Alexis Ollar & Sophia Heidrich
Affiliation: MAP (Mountain Area Preservation)
Work with Tahoe Forest Hospital on the
development of a comprehensive healthcare campus plan.
It is unclear which entity would be the lead on this, the Town or the
Hospital. Truckee 2040 should not give the Hospital free reign to develop a
plan that would impact the entire community.
Tahoe Forest Hospital has already submitted a plan but has yet to receive
a response from the Town. How will this Master Plan fit with the goals,
policies, actions, and EIR review?
Tahoe Forest Hospital (TFH) is working on a "Campus Master Plan
Update,"a long-term guide to future potential development to meet
their future needs; THF is the lead on this process and the Town does
not have any approval authority. Concurrently, THF has submitted a
land use application to the Town with legislative requests to modify
zoning districts, General Plan land use designations and Development
Code standards. The Town has land use authority for any amendments
to the General Plan and Development Code. It is unclear at this time
how the proposed Master Plan will comply with the 2040 General Plan
as it is not adopted.
12
ED-3.1 and ED-3.A (Sustainable Management of Tourism)
Name: Alexis Ollar & Sophia Heidrich
Affiliation: MAP (Mountain Area Preservation)
What is a sustainable level of tourism? What is a sustainable tourism
program? Truckee 2040 needs to provide examples of sustainable tourism
and sustainable tourism programs that can be used to guide a future
program for the Town. Otherwise, it feels like an intangible goal at best
and greenwashing at worst.
The purpose of ED-3.A is to develop a sustainable tourism program.
The specifics of that program have yet to be developed but could
include a definition of sustainable tourism.
13
ED-3.B (Management of Tourist Attractions to Reduce GHG
Emissions) Name: Alexis Ollar & Sophia
Heidrich Affiliation: MAP (Mountain Area
Preservation)
The plan should include and identify sustainable transit options to and
from trails, recreational areas (e.g., Donner Lake), and popular open
spaces. Additionally, the plan should include sustainable transit options to
and from Reno and Sacramento.
ED-3.B is for a future action to adopt regulations, which could include
transit options and/or references to other Town actions.
14
ED-4.9 (Housing Policies and Local Workforce Needs)
Name: Alexis Ollar & Sophia Heidrich
Affiliation: MAP (Mountain Area Preservation)
Housing policies that meet the local workforce needs are critical. How will
this be implemented if we do not create a policy or program to
restrict/ prioritize housing for the local workforce? There are no actions
proposed or associated with this policy.
This policy is in the context of economic development and is
supported by the Housing Elements and other goals/policies/actions in
the Land Use Element such as Goal LU-2. policiy LU-2.1/LU2.2, action
LU-2.A/LU-2B, etc.
15
ED-6.2 (Relocation Opportunities for Industrial Uses)
Name: Alexis Ollar & Sophia Heidrich
Affiliation: MAP (Mountain Area Preservation)
The Town and the community need to work with industrial business owners
to identify the appropriate incentives. Providing opportunities to relocate
industrial uses along the Truckee River in the Downtown and West River
District was identified as a priority in the 2025 General Plan, but this has
proven to be unsuccessful. The Planning Division needs to engage in
meaningful outreach with these business owners and discuss real
incentives/ solutions to relocate industrial uses on the river.
This comment is addressed through Land Use Action 9-A.
16
General Comment
Name: Alexis Ollar & Sophia Heidrich
Affiliation: MAP (Mountain Area Preservation)
1. Truckee 2040 is planning for new commercial/ retail (890,000 sf), office (390,000
sf), and lodging (393 rooms), which equates to 1,526,000 sf of new non-residential
floor area. The BAE 2020 study states that Truckee has enough commercial floor
area to accommodate the next planning horizon. Why are we planning for more
than a million square feet that could negatively jeopardize our current
commercial community and create blight? This is not sound planning and
impacts our existing business community and business character.
2. Utilizing the Reno economic leakage framework to justify the need for more
commercial floor area is inappropriate. It impacts the small business community,
which is the economic diversity that Truckee residents and visitors would like to
preserve. Reno will always provide goods and services for which a mountain
community is not built for, both from an infrastructure and economic standpoint.
It is hard to compete with Reno, and most of the community does not want big
box/ corporate retailers.
The 2040 General Plan is planning for 794 residential units, 20,000 sf
commerical, 7,000 sf office and 26,000 sf more than the projected
2025 General Plan Buildout Capacity, not 1,526,000 sf non-residential
square footage. The 2040 General Plan BAE Urban Economics Non-
Residential Market Analysis (2020) was prepared to inform the
General Plan Update process about existing and anticiapted future
demand for non-residential uses. A leakage analysis was done as part
of this to better understand retail absorption (in square feet) and the
amount of land that the Council would want to plan for for projected
growth through 2040.
17
General Comment Name: Sarah
Green Affiliation: Truckee
Resident
agree with monitoring and limiting short-term rentals.
I support the preserving the eclectic nature of the Downtown. This would include less height
and density than is proposed in the Land Use Element.
Sustainable tourism must include making decisions that support a reasonable amount of tourism that
does not negatively affect the local population.
More policies should be added to create incentives to move industrial off the river.
Comment noted.
18
General Comments Name:
Trixie Watson & Alison Bermant
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
I agree with monitoring/policing short-term rentals when necessary. Instead of infringing on private
property rights, establish a strong system to monitor/ discipline when privilege is abused.
I support preserving the eclectic nature of the Downtown. This would include less height and density
than is proposed in the Land Use Element.
Sustainable tourism must include making decisions that support a reasonable amount of tourism that
does not negatively affect the local population.
More policies should be added to create incentives to move industrial off the river.
Comment noted.
Page 78
Item 7.1
19
Policy ED 3.6 Name: April
Cole Affiliation: Truckee
Resident
Policy ED 3.6 on page 6-11 does recognize the value of infrastructure to support economic
development. We believe it can be strengthened by listing
some examples of “backbone” physical infrastructure such as roads, bridges, bikeways/trails and
utilities, as well as essential community-oriented
infrastructure such as parks, recreation, and a vibrant regional library.
Staff recommends maintaining the policy as proposed. The Council
would decide what infrastructure to prioritize in support of economic
development and climate readiness goals.
20
Policy ED 4.11 Name:
April Cole Affiliation: Truckee
Resident
We also recommend adding a new Policy ED 4-11 on page 6-13 or strengthening Policy ED 4-10 to
include the following:
"Continue to support and develop key community services and facilities such as the proposed regional
library that provide children and youth (and
adult populations) equitable access to digital resources and essential information for job applications,
education and business opportunities and cultural
activities."
Staff supports adding a new action with modified language to clarify
the Town's collaborative role.
Reference new Action ED-4.E
Page 79
Item 7.1
Comment
Number Action, Name, Affiliation Public Comment Staff Response Recommended Changes?
1
General Comment: COS Element
Name: Richard Anderson
Affliation: Truckee Resident / Former Town Mayor
As per the attached letter sent to the Town in February, please update the Conservation and Open
Space Element to explicitly recognize groundwater-dependent ecosystems as an important aspect of
Truckee’s environmental resources. The organizations that support the letter request that a third
paragraph be added to the Water Resources section that highlights groundwater-dependent
ecosystems and provides an explicit basis for the Town's continued involvement in the environmental
aspect of groundwater issues. An example of a paragraph that fulfills this purpose is provided in the
attached letter.
2
Goal: COS-7
Name: Richard Anderson
Affliation: Truckee Resident / Former Town Mayor
As per the attached letter sent to the Town in February, the supporting organizations request that a
policy be added that explicitly protects the beneficial uses of surface waters and groundwater-
dependent ecosystems, thus recognizing the full intent of Goal COS-7. This policy could be as simple
and straightforward as “Protect the beneficial uses provided by surface waters and groundwater-
dependent ecosystems.” This policy would also 1) strengthen the wetland and habitat protection goals
of the Climate Change Adaptation Plan by adding a policy basis in the General Plan, and 2) assist in
defining the biological resources (specifically, groundwater-dependent ecosystems) to be mapped
under Action COS-1.C and protected under Action COS-3.A
3
Action: COS-3.A
Name: Richard Anderson
Affliation: Truckee Resident / Former Town Mayor
Please change the time frame for this action, which implements a plan for protecting sensitive
biological resources, from "mid term" to "short term." This Action has languished for years in the
current General Plan; the organizations that support the February letter request that it be
implemented as quickly as possible. Such a plan is especially important given the pace at which
Truckee is growing and the recurring and potentially worsening impact of drought on our sensitive
biological resources. We need to better understand the location of these resources, their character
and beneficial uses, and their susceptibility to impact from growth in water demand and from land
development. Action COS-3.A also helps implement the near-term, high-priority strategy 7.1 of the
Climate Change Adaptation Plan, which is to “identify sensitive areas and those that provide
ecosystem services and develop policies which ensure their protection.”
4
COS-1.1 Name: Ruth
Miller Affliation:
Truckee Resident
Please define pristine. What if it's adjacent to a freeway or other development? Is there a minimum
size?Staff recommends modifying the wording to change pristine to
"large open space areas."
Update COS-1.1 to reflect revised
language.
5
COS-1.D Name: Ruth
Miller Affliation:
Truckee Resident
Applauding emojis
Comment noted.
6
COS-6 Name: Ruth
Miller Affliation:
Truckee Resident
suggestion #1: Protecting our forest will involve thinning trees. I hoped to see something in here
explicitly involving the Town in that, and holding the Town to do so transparently and collaboratively.
Perhaps organize an advisory council of locals? We're running out of easy steps to take, and are going
to have to tackle defensible space on residential property sooner or later. The mobility working group
is a great model that could be replicated for fuel management.Staff recommends modifying COS-6.4 to better refelct the
community's interest in a holsitic approach to forest management.
Update COS-6.4 to reflect revised
lanagage.
7
COS-8.9 Name: Ruth
Miller Affliation:
Truckee Resident
Is there anything the Town could do to reduce idling? I've walked past so many trucks in parking lots
making a ton of noise and smoke to run air conditioners.
Staff recommends adding an action to evaluate the development of
a voluntary Anti-idling Program and/or enforceable ordinance that
focuses on idling at commercial centers, commercial districts, and
school zones and areas adjacent to other sensitive receptors and
vulnerable populations such as the Tahoe Forest Hospital.Reference new Action COS-8.B.
8
COS-9.5 Name: Ruth
Miller Affliation:
Truckee Resident
This is great! The outdoors are for everyone! Please clarify that this means making these facilities
themselves accessible, including paving key connective routes like the Legacy Trail. Perhaps that could
be another policy, about accessibility?
Accessibility is a requirement of any new project. It is also
highlighted in the Mobility Element including policies M-2.1 and M-
2.7.
Responses to these comments are addressed in a newer public
comment received from Mr. Anderson under Conservation and Open
Space Comment #10 below.
Conservation and Open Space Element
Page 80
Item 7.1
9
General Comment Name: Kathy
Echols Affiliation: Truckee Resident
I support all aspects of Groundwater -Related Proposals for the Truckee's General Plan as submitted
by seven Truckee organizations. This document explains the reasons to update the Conservation and
Open Space Element to explicitly recognize groundwater dependent ecosystems as an important
aspect of Truckee's environmental resources. Please read this document carefully and update the
Conservation and Open Space Element accordingly. It is important to additionally adopt Land Use
Alternatives that support this updated element. Existing and future development in and around
Truckee has the potential to reduce ground -water levels and surface waters that our ecosystems
need to remain healthy. Please be proactive and preserve and protect our ground -water dependent
ecosystems.
Key Question # 1The General Plan should prioritize preservation of the Truckee River and Donner Lake
over the need for equitable access to recreational activities. The plan for the Truckee River and
Donner Lake should prioritize low -impact recreational activities rather than commercial businesses
and housing. These valuable natural resources need to be protected.
Key Question # 2 The General Plan needs to prioritize the preservation goals of
the Town's priorities of sensitive biological resources, water quality, soils and open space. The General
Plan, as proposed, that prioritizes growth over preservation of natural resources is irresponsible.
Thank you for your time, energy, and expertise in making decisions for OUR town. Please listen to the
community and incorporate our ideas into your decisions.
Comment noted.
10
General Comment Name: Richard
Anderson Affiliation: Truckee Resident
Attached are three proposals for the Truckee General Plan's Conservation and Open
Space Element. These proposals are submitted jointly by seven organizations: Mountain
Area Preservation, SOSGlenshire, the Truckee River Watershed Council, Trout Unlimited,
California Trout, the Tahoe Truckee Fly Fishers, and California Fly Fisher magazine.
Because General Plans are, in part, educational documents, the first proposal is to add a
paragraph that notes the importance of groundwater for both development in our area
and for local ecosystems.
The second proposal is to add one or more policies that help protect the natural resource
values that groundwater influences.
The third proposal is a request to prepare a comprehensive plan for the management
and protection of sensitive biological resources like wetlands and the Truckee River and
its tributaries. The General Plan has been calling for this action, shown as COS- 3.A in
the current draft, for too many years. With a worsening climate and continued
population growth, we need to stop kicking this can down the road and finally implement
this Action.
We believe these proposals reflect community values, have the benefit of simplicity, and
lack controversy. We very much appreciate your consideration of them as you move the
General Plan forward to adoption.
Cordially yours,
Richard Anderson
Publisher, California Fly Fisher
for MAP, SOSG, TRWC, TU, CalTrout, TTFF
BTW, also attached is a graph that was sent to Town council members in February,
which shows troubling trends in groundwater elevations at the southern end of Martis
Valley, where a large percentage of groundwater pumping occurs. It's unknown whether
similar trends might be happening within Truckee itself, but the graph nicely illustrates
the effect that we seek to prevent.
Staff supports the recommended changes with the exception of the
timing of COS-3A and with modifications to the suggested "Protection
of Groundwater-Dependent Ecoystems and Surfacce Waters in Plans"
policy to maintain policy language format consistency. Council will be
discussing the timing of actions (near, mid-and long-term) at the
September 27, 2022 joint Council/Commission session.
Reference new backround text,
modified policy COS-3.1, and new
policy COS 3.8
11
COS-1.1 (Increase in Amount of Protected Open Space)
Name: Alexis Ollar & Sophia Heidrich
Affiliation: MAP (Mountain Area Preservation)
The COS Element needs to 'create' not 'encourage' a Transfer of
Development Rights (TDR) program. It is unclear who the Town would be
encouraging as the Town would likely be the entity to develop,
implement, and enforce such a program. A TDR program is critical to
implement this and many other policies referenced throughout the plan.
The first step is identifying the areas to protect. Truckee 2040 needs to map
out sensitive resources (wetlands, riparian habitat, migration corridors,
habitat for sensitive species, etc.) and other open space areas with high
natural, recreational, and cultural resource values to conduct resource
planning. If we do not identify areas where there are opportunities for
density transfers to be received, then we should not make a policy for this
type of program; it feels like lip service.
Staff recommends modifying the wording to read, "Support means to
protect new open space, including public/private partnerships,
transfer of development rigths…;" Land Use Action LU-1.D calls for the
evaluation of the feasibility of a Transfer of Development Rights
program. Identification of "donor" and "receiver" sites would be
considered as part of this action implementation.
Update COS-1.1 to reflect revised
language.
12
COS-1.C (Mapping of Open Space and Natural Resources)
Name: Alexis Ollar & Sophia Heidrich
Affiliation: MAP (Mountain Area Preservation)
These maps should have been developed in the briefing book as part of
this planning process. Without the data for significant natural resources,
information is missing to make informed decisions about important areas
to be protected.
General Plan Land Use Figure LU-2: Land Use Diagram includes
mapped open space and resource conservation areas. In addition,
Figure COS-1 shows mapped Permenantly Protected Open Space and
COS-2 shows mapped natural mineral resources. It is unclear from the
comment what other open space and natural resources should be
mapped.
Page 81
Item 7.1
13
COS-1.D (Transfer of Development Rights)
Name: Alexis Ollar & Sophia Heidrich
Affiliation: MAP (Mountain Area Preservation)
1. Again, a TDR program is a crucial component for implementing numerous
goals and policies included throughout the draft GP, and the language in
this Action needs to reflect its importance. Rather than evaluating the
feasibility of a TDR program, create, implement and enforce a TDR
program.
2. Upper McIver was zoned Resource Conservation in Truckee’ s first land use
map of 1993, due to the steep slope, dense and tall tree stand, and
wetland features. The rezone to high-density housing has not been
supported by MAP or the community. This site would be a primary
candidate for a TDR program, moving the density to a site with capacity
and less environmental constraints.
(1) Staff recommends maintaining the language as proposed. The
evaluation process is important to determining feasibility. There have
to be "donor" and "receiver" sites available for this program to be
successful and this work along with other details would be considered
in the evaluation process. (2) Comment noted.
14
COS-2.A (Management Plans for Truckee River and Donner Lake)
Name: Alexis Ollar & Sophia Heidrich
Affiliation: MAP (Mountain Area Preservation)
There are a variety of actions identified in this GP that essentially kick the
can down the road, and a ton of other plans end up sitting on the shelf. Is
another program needed? Why not incorporate policies here? If not, who
would lead this effort? Are they supportive?
Actions are the means to implement general plan goals and policies at
a focused level. It is not feasible to do all of the proposed actions at
once, nor is it feasible to have all of the knowledge/context/and
opportunity for public engagement and decision-making completed
for every idea presented in the general plan. Because of this, the plan
identifies near-, mid-, and long-term timeframes/priorities that
function as a 20 year workplan. Actions encompassing management
plans create the opportunity to identify additonal actions that Council
may choose to take based on the findings of the plan.
15
COS-2.B (Incentivization of Public Access and Restoration Activites)
Name: Alexis Ollar & Sophia Heidrich
Affiliation: MAP (Mountain Area Preservation)
Amend the Development Code to add incentives to increase and
improve access to the Truckee River and Donner Lake. What are the
proposed incentives? The draft General Plan should have proposed
incentives, this is throughout the draft. Please provide examples.
The action, once initiated by Council, would be the point in time when
incentives would be explored.
16
COS-3.1 (Biological Resource Open Space)
Name: Alexis Ollar & Sophia Heidrich
Affiliation: MAP (Mountain Area Preservation)
What does it mean to consider the items identified in this policy? Provide
specific examples or more concrete details about how this policy would
be implemented and how the consideration would be incorporated into
the development review process..
This policy combines two existing 2025 General Plan Conservation and
Open Space policies and provides guidance that supports
Development Code standards.
17
COS-3.A (Management and Protection Sensitive Biological
Resources) Name: Alexis
Ollar & Sophia Heidrich Affiliation: MAP
(Mountain Area Preservation)
It is vital not only to “prepare”, but also to implement a "comprehensive
plan for the management and protection of sensitive biological resources
such as wetlands, riparian corridors, and critical habitat areas". Such a
plan is critical given the pace at which Truckee is growing and the
recurring and potentially worsening impact of drought on our sensitive
biological resources. Local agencies need to understand the location of
these resources, their character and beneficial uses, and their
susceptibility to impact from water demand growth and land
development.
Actions encompassing the creation of plans provide the opportunity
to identify additonal actions that Council may choose to take based
on the findings of the plan.
18
General Comments Name: Alexis
Ollar & Sophia Heidrich Affiliation: MAP
(Mountain Area Preservation)
The COS Element is silent on the threat to surface waters and wetlands
posed by groundwater pumping.
Update the COS Element to recognize groundwater-dependent
ecosystems as a critical aspect of Truckee's environmental resources.
Include language in the background section of the Element that
highlights groundwater-dependent ecosystems and provides a basis for
an additional policy. Here is an example of a paragraph that fulfills this
purpose:
Water supplied to existing and new development in Truckee comes
almost entirely from the Martis Valley Groundwater Basin.
Groundwater pumping during periods of high demand and low
recharge (summer and autumn) can harm beneficial uses
provided by groundwater-dependent ecosystems and
groundwater-influenced surface waters. Protection of these
practical uses from groundwater pumping is an objective of the
State of California through its Sustainable Groundwater
Management Act, signed into law in 2014.
Add a policy that protects the beneficial uses of surface waters and
groundwater-dependent ecosystems. This policy could be straightforward:
Protect the beneficial uses provided by surface waters and groundwaterdependent
ecosystems." Defining how to implement it would need to
occur at some point, but the first step is to affirm that such protection is an
explicit policy of the Town. Doing so also strengthens the Climate Action
Plan's wetland and habitat protection goals by adding a policy basis.
See response to Conservation and Open Space Comment #10 above.
Page 82
Item 7.1
19
General Comment Name: Sarah
Green Affiliation: Truckee
Resident
The General Plan needs to prioritize the preservation of
natural resources and open space. Truckee has been prioritizing growth and
development for too long now.
I fully support all aspects of Groundwater - Related
Proposals for the Truckee's General Plan which has been submitted by seven
Truckee organizations - Mountain Area Preservation, SOS Glenshire, Trout Unlimited, California Trout,
Tahoe Truckee Fly Fishers, Truckee River Watershed Council, and California Fly Fisher magazine.
The General Plan should prioritize preservation of the
Truckee River and Donner Lake, prioritize low -impact recreational activities
rather than commercial businesses and housing.Comment noted. See response to Conservation and Open Space
Comment #10 above.
20
General Comments Name:
Trixie Watson & Alison Bermant
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
The General Plan needs to prioritize the preservation of natural resources and open space.
Truckee has been prioritizing growth and development for too long now.
I fully support all aspects of Groundwater- Related Proposals for the Truckee’ s General Plan which has
been submitted by seven Truckee organizations - Mountain Area Preservation, SOS Glenshire, Trout
Unlimited, California Trout, Tahoe Truckee Fly Fishers, Truckee River Watershed Council, and
California Fly Fisher magazine. The General Plan should prioritize preservation of the Truckee River
and Donner Lake, prioritize
low-impact recreational activities.
Comment noted. See response to Conservation and Open Space
Comment #10 above.
Page 83
Item 7.1
Comment
Number Action, Name, Affiliation Public Comment Staff Response Recommended Changes?
1
Action: WILDFIRES
Name: Kevin McKechnie
Affiliation: Deputy Chief, Truckee Fire
The National Fire Protection Association has started a new program called Outthink Wildfire, wildfire
action policies. Here is a link to the website: https://www.nfpa.org/outthinkwildfire . The program is
“A Call to End the Destruction of Communities by Wildfire in 30 Years” Outthink wildfire is rooted in
two realities: Wildfires are going to happen and the fire service will never be able to save all property
in the path of a wildfire. There are 5 tenets of Outthink Wildfire Wildfire Action Policies: 1. Retrofit
Existing Homes and Communities, 2. Codes, Standards and Land Use Planning, 3. Training and
Equipment for Local Fire Departments, 4. Landscape Management, and 5. Public Education. To be
completely honest with you, California and our local area typically comes out as pretty progressive
when measured against these national initiatives. We have chapter 7A of the building code for home
hardening and we have been relatively progressive when it comes to defensible space and fuels
management. However, based on recent fire behavior, I think it is fair to say we are still not doing
enough. I was really happy to see that the defensible space, non-combustible zone, 0-5 feet around
the structure was included in the plan. Thanks for including that. It is our understanding that, that
zone will become State law next year. I also liked seeing the requirement for the fire protection plan
on new developments. There are some fuels management zones that should be considered for policy
action. We often refer to the WUI Defense Zone and the WUI Threat Zone as a perimeter of fuels
modification that would surround a community. .....(CONTINUED BELOW)
SN-2.3 calls out Town collaboration with Truckee Fire in reviewing fire
protection plans and provisions in new development. Truckee Fire has
the expertise to take the lead on the review of these plans. There is
additional opportunity to amend the landscaping section of the
Development Code to ensure defensible space and fuels management
is considered early in the landscaping design process and for the life of
the landscaping.
Update Action SN-2.E to reflect revised
language.
2
Action: WILDFIRES
Name: Kevin McKechnie
Affiliation: Deputy Chief, Truckee Fire
...(CONTINUED) Here is a weblink that has some pretty good definitions for these zones:
https://www.fs.usda.gov/detail/cleveland/landmanagement/planning/?cid=fsbdev7_016495 .
Additionally, the WUI threat and defense zones are addressed in our 2016 CWPP. Fuels treatment in
the WUI threat and defense zones can generally be considered to extend roughly two miles away from
the development. This distance is adjusted for fuel type, topography, anticipated fire behavior and
ultimately the desired fire conditions. As part of our Measure T Wildfire Prevention Program, we hope
to continue fuels treatments in these zones. Much good work has been completed but more needs to
be done. I would recommend that fuels treatment and ongoing maintenance in the WUI defense and
threat zones be a requirement of new and existing developments. This is probably a big ask but our
understanding is that these treatments likely saved many homes in the South Lake Tahoe area from
the Caldor fire. We will be updating our CWPP this year as part of Measure T: Wildfire Prevention
Program.
The Council would want to discuss if fuels treatment/on-going
maintence should be a new Town requirement for existing and new
development along with any associated new compliance
measures/staffing to support these actions.
3
Action: WILDFIRES / Hazardous Materials
Name: Kevin McKechnie
Affiliation: Deputy Chief, Truckee Fire
Good job identifying the hazardous materials threats to our community. Specifically, the railroad,
freeway and Kinder Morgan pipeline. A concern of mine is whether we are sufficiently aware and
adequately prepared for these hazards that transit our community. Especially with the new
developments adjacent to the railroad and pipeline at Coldstream and at the old lumber mill site. As
you are likely aware, the volumes of hazardous materials by rail can be quite large and the fact that
these materials don’t find a local destination might leave us unprepared and under equipped in the
event of a spill. From our office, we see that the UPRR expends considerable resources keeping the
rails well maintained and serviceable, but we are in an area with mountains, canyons, steep grades and
severe weather that could pre-dispose us to a catastrophic event. I would ask that our hazardous
materials exposure specifically related to materials that transit our community, be studied in more
depth. Here is a link to a timeline of oil train derailments:
The Town actively follows UPRR proposals to increase the transport of
hazardous materials through Truckee and collaborates with other
cities to oppose permit modifications that would increase the
volume/frequency of hazardous matreials (i.e.-Use Permit
amendments). The Council would want to discuss the Town's role in
studying hazardous material exposure, given the Town's limited
regulatory authority with respect to UPRR rights of way, highways and
established piplines.
4
Action: WILDFIRES / Emergency Response and Disaster Recovery
Name: Kevin McKechnie
Affiliation: Deputy Chief, Truckee Fire
I see that the Truckee Fire Protection District is responsible with Truckee PD on the development of a
mobile application for streamlining transportation and emergency response (SN-6.G). That sounds
reasonable to be, but I am not sure specifically what our role will be, happy to participate though.
Thank you for the opportinuty to comment. I'm, happy to continue to participate in the process if
needed.
Comment noted.
5
Policy: SN-6.2
Name: Jennifer Bloomfield
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
Modify the "vulnerable populations" to include the needs of our workers and visitors who become
stranded on our roadways and in our buildings.
Staff recommends maintaining the policy as proposed. The Town
already coordinates with partner agencies on managing traffic caused
by major events.
6
Action: SN-6.D
Name: Jennifer Bloomfield
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
Modify text and expand "community stakeholders" to include community businesses and community
workers who commute from outside the area..
Stakeholders would be defined as part of the plan creation. Staff
recommends maintaining the policy as proposed.
7
Action: SN- 6F
Name: Jennifer Bloomfield
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
Modify the text "support the efforts to educate the public" to include local businesses, community
workers who live out of the area, second homeowners, tourism and recreation visitors.
"The public" includes everyone from full-time residents, to visitors to
second homeowners, etc. Staff recommends maintaining the policy as
proposed.
8
Policy: SN-6.3
Name: Jennifer Bloomfield
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
Include community businesses, workers from out of the area, recreation and tourism stakeholders in
emergency planning efforts.
The policy includes identification of a diverse population. Staff
recommends maintaining the policy as proposed.
Safety and Noise Element
Page 84
Item 7.1
9
Policy: SN-8.12
Name: Jennifer Bloomfield
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
SAFETY - the Union Pacific Railroad must continue to use warning whistles.There is a process for local jurisdictions to request to reduce train
warning whistles; the Council has previously supported pursuit of this
process. Staff recommends maintaining the policy as proposed.
10
Action: SN-8-G
Name: Jennifer Bloomfield
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
SAFETY - Continue warning whistles for the two at-grade crossings in Truckee (at Bridge Street and
near Olympic Heights)
Staff recommends maintaining the policy as proposed.
11
Policy: SN-6.3
Name: Jennifer Bloomfield
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
Include agencies which cross state lines and as well as agencies responsible for passengers on
Interstate 80.
Staff recommends maintaining the policy as proposed.
12
Policy: SN-8
Name: Jennifer Bloomfield
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
The noise generated by extraction, and associated transportation of Mineral Resources should be
included as a source of noise.
Table SN-1 includes noise sources recommended by the Office and
Planning Research; materials extraction is included in the last category
in the table (offices, industrial, manufacturing, utilties, agriculture).
Most transporation noise in Truckee is defined as ambient noise. Policy
SN 8-8 includes consideration of transporation noise sources when
evalauting new development.
13
Policy: SN-8.1
Name: Jennifer Bloomfield
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
Require existing noise data to include an airport noise contour map.Airport noise is shown in Figure SN-7. All new is development reviewed
for consistency with the Truckee Tahoe Airport Land Use Compatibility
Plan.
14
Policy: SN-8.17 Flyover Noise "Airport Safety" & SN-8.18 "Future
Airport Noise Exposure"
Name: David Diamond & Mary Hetherington
Affiliation: Truckee Residents
We appreciate the Plan’s recognition of and respect for airport land use compatibility. It’s imperative
that you inhibit, where possible, development that will result in noise and safety impacts for those who
occupy future structures.
In a housing-challenged region like ours, wouldbe tenants can be enticed by whatever is available or
affordable, thereby accepting tenancy in less desirable situations. We do not want any Truckee
neighborhood to bear the brunt of airport operations, either through property value reductions or
noise and safety impact. This brings us to our primary concern with the content in the policy
subsections: “Supporting the efforts of” and “cooperating with” the Airport District is not enough. The
Airport District is under the direction of elected officers who potentially change every two years. It
cannot be assumed that every airport board will consist of community focused directors who reliably
act in the interests of Truckee and other regional municipalities affected by airport operations.
For this reason, we encourage the Town to strengthen its language toward its Airport District
partnership. Don’t just aim to support and cooperate with the Airport District; aim to encourage, guide
and challenge the Airport District. Commit to addressing the Airport District Board when issues come
before it that could adversely impact the residents of Truckee. Pledge to current and future Truckee
residents that the Town will keep an eye on Airport District policy, and that you will speak up on behalf
of Truckee residents who are most directly impacted by airport operations’ safety and impact.
We are different agencies, but we have in common the human beings we serve. Because we cannot be
certain that all current and future elected officers will always act in the best interests of our shared
community members, we must adopt policy that accounts for any weaknesses in political will.
Sincerely, and, again, speaking only for of ourselves and not the Truckee Tahoe Airport District,
Staff recommend modifying SN-8.17 to encourage the airport to hold
pilots accountable for using appropriate flight paths. Staff also
recommends modifying SN-8.18 from cooperation on future airport
noise, to ensuring future airport actions minimize impacts to Truckee
residents.
Update SN-8.17 and SN-8.18 with
modified language.
15
Policy: SN-2.2-4
Name: Michael and Heather Llewellyn
Affiliation: Truckee Residents
Consider retaining some existing, mature (large), fire-resistant tolerant tree species in development
zones to maintain the shade canopy necessary to offset future rising temperatures. In addition to
cooling shade, large trees will support other plant species that may be incorporated into landscaping
efforts, as well as, the overall health of Truckee's forest ecology. Also, consider incorporating the
exisiting shade canopy into parking lot design including support for the canopy and landscaping
through drainage design.
Modifications to the Town's landscaping requirements would be
considered at the time Development Code amendments for 2040
General Plan implementation are being worked on. Shade, plant
communities, existing trees, etc. would be reviewed as part of the
future Development Code update process.
16
Policy: SN-2.6
Name: Michael and Heather Llewellyn
Affiliation: Truckee Residents
Include the Washoe as consulting partners. Include shifting the public perception of fuels reduction to
an effort to restore the forest ecology to its traditional, fire-adapted, open stand structure dominated
by large fire-tolerant/resistant tree species, through county-wide social media, art and school district-
embedded programming and by keeping people informed in real-time.
The focus of SN-2.6 is to highlight the Town's cooperative role with
agencies responsible for fuel clearing review/permitting. The Washoe
Tribe are not one of these agencies. However, any work defined as a
project under the California Environmental Quality Act requires
consultation with native tribes, so the Wahoe would be consulted in
this example. Staff recommends adding a new policy for partnering
with Truckee Fire, CAL FIRE, US Forest Service and others to educate
the community about the benefits of fuels reduction and controlled
burns. Reference modified Policy COS-6.4
17
Policy: SN-2.7
Name: Michael and Heather Llewellyn
Affiliation: Truckee Residents
Consider leading/participating in the effort to shift the social perception of prescribed burns to an
understanding that they are an integral part of forest restoration and maintenance through county-
wide coordinated social media, art and school district-embedded programming and by keeping people
informed in real-time.
See response to Safety and Noise Comment #16 above.
18
Policy: SN-2.9
Name: Michael and Heather Llewellyn
Affiliation: Truckee Residents
Consider supporting the development of a county-wide Wildfire Mitigation Fee to fund fire protection
and forest restoration efforts that affect the contiguous forest beyond Truckee.
Nevada County has Measure V (Nevada County Wildfire Prevention,
Emergency Services and Disaster Readiness Sales and use Tax) on the
November 8, 2022 ballot.
Page 85
Item 7.1
Comment
Number Action, Name, Affiliation Public Comment Staff Response
Recommended Changes?
1
General Comment: CAP Element
Name: Dan Cockrum
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
CAP Element - I fully support the comments of CATT with respect to the town's unrealistic approach to
target dates and total lack of understanding the infrastructure impacts of eliminating fossil energy in a
move to an all electric future.
The Council is currently discussing electrification as part of their Reach
Code analysis.
2
General Comment: Guiding Principles
Name: Deirdre Henderson
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
I would like to see an explicit reference to climate mitigation in the guiding principles. I suggest
revising the first guiding principle to read: Make Truckee a leader in environmental conservation,
sustainability and climate mitigation and reduce the town's impact on the local and global
environment."
Staff supports the recommended modification. Modify CAP guiding principle to
incorporate climate mitigation.
3
Policy: M-3.9
Name: Deirdre Henderson
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
This policy is a general statement of desire to transition local and regional transit fleets to no- or low-
emissions vehicles. However, I do not see any actions related to this policy goal. While I do not know if
this should be in the " mobility" section imported into the CAP, we should also be encouraging
business vehicle fleets to make this transition. Furthermore, we should be working with the PUD and
fleet owners to explore the possibility of using electric vehicle batteries as a source of backup- or
supplemental energy at times when the fleets are not in use. This is being done with electric school
bus fleets in some other areas. (And yes, I understand the problem of using electric school buses for
some long routes within the large TTUSD district. However, not all routes are so long, and electric
vehicle ranges are increasing all the time, so transitioning to an electric fleet can be planned for over
time.)
See updated Policy M-3.9 for low/no-emissions transit fleets.Reference revised Policy M-3.9
4
Goal: CAP 4 Low and Zero Emissions Vehicles
Name: Deirdre Henderson
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
I suggest adding an additional CAP policy along these lines: Engage with service districts and
businesses with large vehicle fleets to encourage conversion to low- and zero -emissions vehicles and,
in collaboration with electric utilities, explore using electric fleet batteries for back-up and
supplemental electric energy."
This language can be added but it should be understood that the
electric fleet batteries have minimal supply capabilities.
Update Policy M-3.9 to include
collaboration on back-up batteries
5
Action: LU-8.D
Name: Deirdre Henderson
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
I am inserting this comment at this reference number because this is the only mention of the Tahoe
Forest Hospital in the CAP. This action refers to the Tahoe Forest Hospital Master Plan, which is a land
use plan subject to Town jurisdiction, so the Town has a direct role in this matter. However, I would
like the CAP to encourage the Town to engage with the Hospital District on its overall carbon
footprint/greenhouse gas emissions. Overall, it is estimated that healthcare facilities account for about
8% of greenhouse gas emissions in the United States. Tahoe Forest is a very large business and
employer in our area. It, unlike many other healthcare facilities, is publicly chartered and, one would
hope, this should make it particularly sensitive to the impacts of its GHG emissions on the climate, and
the health effects caused by GHG emissions.
Staff recommends modifying LU-8.C to include carbon
footprint/greenhouse gas reduction.
Update LU-8.C to include carbon
footprint/greenhouse gas reduction.
6
Policy: CAP-7.1; Action CAP 7.B; Appendix C, p. 13
Name: Deirdre Henderson
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
I submit this comment with respect to the policy, action and portion of Appendix C relating to "
renewable natural gas." I regret to say that the CAP's treatment of "renewable natural gas" sounds like
the greenwashing inserts on RNG that we receive in our Southwest Gas utility bills. Where to begin?
1. RNG is methane, like fossil gas, but sourced largely from decaying feedstocks and cleaned up to be
suitable for transmission in gas pipes. Some RNG is made synthetically from, for example, gasification
of biomass. When RNG escapes from leaky gas pipes it adds to methane pollution in the atmosphere.
When it burns, it adds to carbon pollution. However, because it avoids the methane that the
decomposing organic matter from which it is sourced would have produced, it is net - net considered
less harmful than fossil gas. It is not, however, benign.
2. There is simply not a big enough supply of RNG to replace all or even some of our fossil gas use.
The estimates for RNG substitution for fossil gas in Appendix C seem wildly optimistic. Many experts
believe that the limited supply of RNG should be saved and used only for hard -to -decarbonize
industrial processes.
3. RNG is expensive to produce. Expect gas bills to rise significantly.
4. By greenwashing with RNG, gas companies get to continue to expand and maintain their
infrastructure, which is where they make their profit.
As we move toward electrification and reduced fossil gas use, gas companies face a death spiral of an
eroding customer base, requiring higher charges to remaining customers who will tend to be those
who cannot afford to electrify and are least able to bear higher costs. ...(CONTINUED BELOW)
Staff recommends modifying CAP Policy 7.1, CAP Action 7.B and CAP
Action 7.D to include references to geothermal. The
Council/Commission discussed other changes to CAP Action 7.B to
modify the % renewable to a % greenhouse gas reduction.
Climate Action Plan Element
Update CAP Policy 7,1, CAP Action
7.B and CAP Action 7D.
Page 86
Item 7.1
7
Policy: CAP-7.1; Action CAP 7.B; Appendix C, p. 13
Name: Deirdre Henderson
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
...(CONTINUED) At 100% Renewable Truckee we have been exploring an alternative pathway for gas
companies which involves using their existing infrastructure rights of way to install " geo grids"--
neighborhood loops of thermal energy derived from borings in the ground and connected to heat
pumps in houses for space and water heating. This is not a new technology and is currently in use in
Europe, on university campuses in the US. .a nd in a few US. housing developments. Gas utilities in
Massachusetts and New York are running geo grid pilot programs, and utilities in Colorado and
Washington state are in the planning process for pilots. By connecting geo grids as they develop, a gas
utility can eventually transition to being a thermal utility. The good news for consumers is that gas
utilities have the engineering staffs, financing capability and sales forces to power this transition and
save themselves in the process. Some electrification of buildings would still be necessary (appliances,
EV charging), but the PUD would be significantly relieved of the challenge of assembling additional
electricity resources to support broader electrification. We believe that a conversation should be
started with Southwest about geo grids. Truckee does not have the market importance to do this
alone, but in coalition with other municipalities and organizations in the SWG service area in eastern
California and western Nevada, we could represent a stronger stakeholder group to initiate the
conversation. A good basic introduction to geo grid technology and gas utilities is in this VOLTS
podcast, interviewing Audrey Schulman and Zeyneb Magavi of HEET, a climate solutions incubator
that is partnering with utilities on geo grid pilot programs:
hwvpsvawpttpswo:o/c/ouwltdt.hsldf.ctu/sa/rl-semt-ya-nadnedt#ails We suggest that the reference to
RNG be removed in CAP policy 7.1. We further suggest that Action item CAP 7.8 be removed and that
consideration be given to an Action item along these lines: Seek to form a coalition of local
governments and interested organizations in the eastern California and western Nevada SWG service
area to initiate a conversation with SWG about the feasibility and desirability of transitioning to geo
grid technology for thermal energy."
8
Goal: 7 & 8 Name:
Deirdre Henderson
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
CAP Goal 8, dealing with Energy Efficiency in New Development contains actions regarding capacity
building (8D) and updating (hopefully reducing or eliminating) permitting and inspection fees and
streamlining the review process (8B). Similar provisions should be incorporated in CAP Goal 7, Energy
Efficiency in Existing Development.
Staff recommends maintaining the language as proposed. As part of
implementation the Council would consider the scope including
application to both existing and new development.
9
Goal: 7
Name: Deirdre Henderson
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
In order to provide reliable knowledge and advice to consumers contemplating building
decarbonization, we need a " One Stop Shop" where building owners can get comprehensive
consulting on their particular building and options for decarbonization. This should be incorporated
into Action CAP - 7-A.
According to Truckee's community GHG inventory, our greatest source of GHG emissions is our
existing building stock. In order to decarbonize our buildings, our most significant challenge, and the
one essential to achieving decarbonization, is financing. We cannot rely on local, state or federal
funding for the financing necessary to do this. There will
simply not be enough government funding to decarbonize all the buildings in America, or even
Truckee needing it. The City of Ithaca, NY has committed to decarbonize all of its 60,00 buildings by
2030. The estimated cost of doing this for this one small city is $2 billion. However, American capital
markets are among the largest and most creative in the world. Using private capital for
decarbonization loans to building owners is not only possible, but is being done in a handful of other
municipalities. While private capital is, at the moment, looking for a 91-0% return on its investment,
public funding can be used to subsidize interest rates and provide credit enhancements ( such as loan
loss reserves) to make decarbonization loans affordable for building owners ( who will mostly recoup
the cost of servicing the loan via energy cost savings) and manage the risk for lenders. Financing of
some sort will be necessary for the vast majority of buildings requiring decarbonization. Creating
financing programs utilizing private capital with publicly funded enhancements should be explicitly
provided for in the actions for CAP Goal 7.
The Council would need to consider if a "one stop shop" option is
feasible with currently building division staffing (or other Town staff)
and what revenue would be used to pay for this service since the
Town's Building Division is an enterprise fund. The Council would also
want to consider if financing programs should be included as a CAP
Goal 7 action.
10
General Comment: CAP
Name: Jennifer Bloomfield
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
Work with TDPUD and customers to monitor available groundwater and create programs for gray
water utilization.
The Council would need to consider if the Town should participate in
groundwater use discussions with the TDPUD and graywater
regulations with Nevada County Environmental Health.
11
Action: CAP-7.G
Name: Jennifer Bloomfield
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
Promote grey water utilization programs. Incentivize customers to replace existing landscape with
drought tolerant landscape solutions.
Staff recommends maintaining CAP-7.G as proposed.
Staff recommends modifying CAP Policy 7.1, CAP Action 7.B and CAP Action 7.D to include references to geothermal. The Council/Commission discussed other changes to CAP Action 7.B to modify the % renewable to a % greenhouse gas reduction. Update CAP Policy 7,1, CAP Action 7.B and CAP Action 7D.
Page 87
Item 7.1
12
CAP-7 & CAP-8
Name: Patrick Flora
Affiliation: CATT
The focus of both CAP-7 and CAP-8 on “ Electrification” present numerous issues that cannot be
mitigated to a less than significant threshold. Including, but not limited to public Health and Life Safety
concerns. Given the climate in Truckee, numerous often lengthy power outages occur in winter
months when temperatures are regularly <20°F and with the ever increasing wildfire conditions which
trigger unplanned outages in the summer. The elimination or substantial reduction of Natural Gas as a
source of heat, water heat and cooking fuel is a direct threat to the Health, Life and Safety of Town
residents until
the technology exists to provide affordable, reliable electricity and battery backup to every resident.
Additionally, the methodology and actual production of “renewable” vs fossil fuel-based percentages
of electricity provided to the Town along with new technologies in NG production and supply should
be addressed. Solar efficacy, TDPUD renewable energy contract structure, pricing, sourcing, and
impacts on all rate payers should be addressed relative to all solar mitigations. As well as viable snow
loads, installation and warranty issues should be addressed for solar to be a viable mitigation
measure. The EIR should recognize that Solar generation is not possible on many properties in
Truckee due to shading from nearby trees & since higher elevations in Town have snowloads, which
exceed structural capacity of PV systems. Thus, the need for mitigations for not being able to meet
net zero goals will be necessary where power generation is not possible or efficient.
The Draft 2040 General Plan includes goals and policies to "promote"
and "incentivize" electrification. The Town is also going through a
separate Reach Code process which would further define
requirements, if adopted by Council.
13
General Comment: Transportation and Circulation
Name: Patrick Flora
Affiliation: CATT
Cumulative impacts of transitory ( I-80 pass thru, tourist traffic, etc.) fossil fuel vehicle VMT’s on
Truckee GHG emissions should be clearly identified.
Comment noted.
14
CAP-1.B Name:
Patrick Flora
Affiliation: CATT
CAP-1.B: VMT Mitigation: Current Town policy as it relates to multi-family 5 units or
more requires a traffic analysis of VMT. Unless the project is located within one half mile
of the designated Market Rate Residential CEQA VMT Exemption Zone these projects will
be deemed to have significant unmitigable impacts and therefore unbuildable.
Alternative: Modify current Town standards to evaluate EV use, EV deed restrictions and
other methodologies that accurately reflect changing technology and green energy
being used to charge the vehicles.
The Council could consider this as part of any future actions to modify
adopted VMT thresholds.
15
CAP-1.C Name:
Patrick Flora
Affiliation: CATT
Reduce Parking Requirements: Current and proposed parking reductions are
and will continue to have negative impacts particularly on “ affordable” housing until and unless a
viable, substantial, and sustainable increase in mass transit/ alternative transportation options are
implemented. With mitigations, ensure that adequate parking is provided until a mass transit system is
in place. It must be recognized that in the timeframe of the 2040 general plan, that most vehicles will
likely be electric and using electricity generated from renewable sources. Thus, reducing parking for
them will not yield significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions.
State housing law allows for reduced parking for affordable housing
projects and ADUs. The Council has previously directed staff to review
parking generation rates to ensure there is not an excess of parking.
With the 2040 General Plan the Council is interested in addressing
greenhouse gas emissions from a variety of sources through a variety
of tools, including higher density within the gateway area where
housing would be in proximity to services. Reduced parking
requirements is one way that additional density can be
accommodated as there is less land and square footage dedicated to
the parking of cars and more land and space dedicated to space for
people.
Page 88
Item 7.1
Comment
Number Action, Name, Affiliation
1
Policy: 2.2 Name:
Jennifer Bloomfield
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
2
Downtown Plan: HR-D-3
Name: Jennifer Bloomfield
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
Downtown Truckee Plan
Page 89
Item 7.1
Public Comment
Add LU-9 to require location of development to integrate into scenic and historic viewscapes.
Historic viewscapes identified within the Downtown Historic district should be included in the Historic
Resource Inventory and given protection.
Downtown Truckee Plan
Page 90
Item 7.1
Staff Response Recommended Changes?
Staff recommends maintaining the language as proposed.
The Town's Historic Preservation Program mirrors National Park
Service criteria; viewscapes is not an eligible criteria.
Downtown Truckee Plan
Page 91
Item 7.1
Comment
Number Action, Name, Affiliation Public Comment Staff Response Recommended Changes?
1
General Comment: GP Review Process
Name: Ruth Jackson Hall
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
A few thoughts as we enter review process of the Draft 2040 General Plan:
1. Make it as easy as possible for constituents to offer public comment by making it
clear to the public that the usual mode—in person, by email, or online--- is fine. OR,
they can use the new comment form that follows the format of the GPU. We do not
want to discourage comment at this important time by presenting a new method that
may not be accessible to all community members.
2. Allow 3-minute public comment time, for each element under discussion.
3. As the process proceeds, it would be helpful to provide easy access to the data and
themes that have emerged from 2 years of pubic commentary regarding growth,
character, land uses, etc. It is important for the public to understand how their
concerns are reflected in the GPU.
Comment noted.
2
General Comment: General Plan
Name: Alexis Ollar
Affiliation: MAP Executive Director
Dear Truckee Town Council & Planning Commission Members,
Thank you for the opportunity to provide public comments on the Draft Truckee 2040
General Plan. As the Executive Director for MAP, I have had the blessing to serve our
members and the Truckee Tahoe conservation community since 2011. I have also
served on the General Plan Advisory Committee (GPAC) for the last four years as the
environmental representative. Our organization is planning to participate in the
upcoming public hearings and provide verbal comments on the draft elements while
also conducting outreach to get the community involved in Truckee 2040.
MAP has dedicated thousands of staff hours to this public process through outreach
that has brought the community to the surveys, the zooms, and the hearings. I have
heard from hundreds of MAP supporters feeling helpless after those efforts. Wondering
why it matters to take a survey when concerns regarding too much growth, fire threats,
lacking infrastructure, and the need for identifying local workforce housing seem to be
ignored during the Land Use Alternative (LUA) process. I continue to remind residents
that their voice counts, even though I, too, have witnessed economic data, survey
responses, and public comments dismissed. I am hopeful that the community at large
will continue to participate because the plan and the environmental analysis are not
yet done, and this plan is supposed to reflect the vision and goals of the community. ...(CONTINUED
BELOW)
3
General Comment: General Plan
Name: Alexis Ollar
Affiliation: MAP Executive Director
As I review the draft, I continue to read statements that reference these planning ideas
that came from GPAC or the public, and I am grappling with that. The concepts,
including the five focus areas, mixed-use, high density, increased floor area ratio (FAR),
and new zoning districts, came from Staff and the Consultants. GPAC and the public
have been reacting to them. As a GPAC member, I witnessed our inability to pick a
land use alternative and have consistent participation throughout the last four years.
GPAC may have influenced some of the planning concepts, but we did not make a
LUA recommendation to the Planning Commission/ Town Council in the fall of 2021.
Unfortunately, when the Town Council's resolution to re-evaluate the Upper McIver
rezone in the General Plan update process from 2018 was dismissed early on due to
downzoning or a 'takings' lawsuit concern, we lost faith in the process. What is the point
of a resolution if we do not really intend to address the issue or problem solve? This is just
one of the issues with Upper McIver, and why it has been so contentious during Truckee
2040.
The pandemic majorly impacted Truckee 2040, which is why hundreds of community
members advocated that the process be put on hold in July of 2020. We now have a
301-page draft General Plan, a 134-page draft Downtown Plan, a future EIR, and what
looks like A LOT of homework outlined in the draft, such as redoing the Hilltop Master
Plan and Downtown Historic Design Guidelines and more. COVID has brought to light
land use constraints and impacts with over-use of recreational assets, impacts to
natural resources, and infrastructure constraints, which has not been reflected in
Truckee 2040, except for stating that sustainable tourism is a priority. Shouldn't we
address all potential land use changes in this process as a holistic planning effort?...(CONTINUED
BELOW)
Comment noted.
General Comments
Page 92
Item 7.1
4
General Comment: General Plan
Name: Alexis Ollar
Affiliation: MAP Executive Director
Part of MAP's Environment & Community LUA requested that we analyse our past
Master Plans & Specific Plans to recognize the existing development capacity. And ask
how these plans may be impacted by new state laws (i.e., density bonuses), how to
create policies and zoning overlays to deed restrict housing for the local workforce, and
how to address climate action planning for sites that align with infill and density. We
have been advocating to prioritize these areas and not forget the growth we have
already envisioned and planned for, not 'no growth.'
MAP is about to turn thirty-five this summer, and our organization has participated in
every General Plan process to date and all major land use reviews, with our mission
forming as a call to action due to poor planning and policies coming from Nevada
City. In 1987, the community did not want decision-makers to overbuild Truckee and
ruin the mountain character, which is why we opposed and prevailed in stopping
KMART. Now, in 2022, we are supported by MAP members who do not want decisionmakers
to vastly change the community's character by allowing development that is
out of scale for the mountains and resources.
Now that the final public hearings are about to initiate, I ask that you all listen to the
community with open ears. Read the draft plans, ask questions, review hundreds of
surveys and public comments, and think about the community members who are not
represented because they are working multiple jobs to live here.
Truckee's future development and conservation decisions will outlive us all. As a town,
we are still very young, which makes getting the General Plan, goals, policies, action
items, and zoning right. Thank you again for your service in this critical community
planning process.
5
General Comment: p.9-13 Goals, Policies, and Actions
Name: Deirdre Henderson
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
I found the following to be, frankly, shocking and disappointing. The second paragraph on page 91-3
discusses Truckee's emissions reductions targets and the emissions reductions required to meet them.
It states that in order to reach the Town's 2040 target of reducing emissions to 4067, 0 MTCO2e, the
Town would need to achieve emissions reductions of 15072,0 MTCO2e. However, this Climate Action
Plan will only reduce emissions by 7801, 7MTCO2e in 2040, about 390. percent short of the 2040
emissions reduction goal. Amazingly, the paragraph continues: "To the extent climate change science,
policy, technology, and other factors continue to advance, the Town will be able to apply new
reductions toward reducing emissions on a trajectory consistent with the 2040 target and the state's
2045 carbon neutrality goal in future CAP Element updates." In other words, we are kicking the can
down the road on achieving almost one-third of the emissions reductions needed to reach the 2040
goal. We should be adopting a CAP of sufficient ambition that it can get us to the 2040 target based on
what we know now. If between now and then, changes in policies, technologies or climate science
require the CAP to be revised, that can be done; but we should start with a plan that gets us to our
target goal.
The Council discussed emission reduction targets at their July 19,
2022 joint Council/Commission meeting and directed staff to modify
the draft Climate Action Element to meet 2040 targets. The Town's
General Plan consultant has provide a memorandum in response to
this request which is included in the September 27, 2022 joint
Council/Commission agenda packet.
6
General Comment: Council Meeting Format
Name: Patrick Flora
Affiliation: CATT
With the current format of the joint Council/ Commission meetings there is little to no opportunity for
the public to provide informed comment on the questions that the Council/ Commission have asked
staff nor the staff responses prior to the meeting. Based on the last joint meeting, the questions staff
proposed to Council and Commission did not appear to be in the staff report for the meeting. With
public comment being opened prior to Council/ Commission deliberation there is essentially no
opportunity to express support or concern regarding the discussion topics. As the EIR has not yet been
released we cannot comment on the scope of potential impacts, significance or lack thereof of Goals
and Policies outlined in the draft GP Update that will be addressed in the EIR. Therefore, our
comments below are some of our concerns as they pertain to the CAP Element and Mobility.
Comment noted.
Comment noted.
Page 93
Item 7.1
7
General Comment: General Plan
Name: Ron Mills Affiliation:
Truckee Resident
Please revise the draft General Plan to reduce the overall development capacity being proposed. Over
the past two years of this process, the community has provided overwhelming concern about the pace
of Truckee’ s growth and associated impacts ( traffic, water supply, wildfire evacuation, etc). The
proposed General Plan update includes the following increases ( as outlined in the table on page 4 of
the staff report):
Commercial – 6,000 sq ft
Office – 7,000 sq ft
Industrial – 8,000 sq ft
That is a total of 21,000 square feet of development above the current General Plan. The existing
General Plan already allows for ample increases in development. What is the justification for these
additional increases? To retain our town character and preserve our viewsheds, increased densities
should be applied in isolated areas so that we don’ t create a proliferation of 3-4 story buildings lining
Donner Pass Road. Before any additional density is approved, policies, programs, and mitigation
measures must be developed to deal with existing conditions ( i.e. traffic, transit, parking, wildfire
hazard constraints). We also need to be able to accommodate for density increases down the road
given the new state housing mandates. Therefore, if we zone for lower density now, we will have
more flexibility for increases later. We need to slow development down and take the time to make
good decisions that benefit our residents, preserve town character, and sustain quality of life for
ourselves and for the generations to come. Thank you for your time and consideration.
Staff notes there were errors in the staff report for commercial and
industrial square footages (and the associated Draft 2040 General
Plan Appendix B). The correct totals are: Commercial - 20,000 sf;
Industrial - 26,000 sf. Based on the Planning Division's 2021 Annual
Community Development Report, the Town has about 10% remaining
capacity for non-residential square footage and 27% for residential
assumed under 2025 General Plan buildout (including approved and
under construction projects). Further work done with the 2040
General Plan indicates the Town does not have remaining industrial
capacity. The projections in the draft 2040 General Plan are based on
need through 2040. The Town cannot legally down zone (decrease
residential density on) residential properties.
8
General Comment: General Plan
Name: Sarah Green Affiliation:
Truckee Resident
I am very concerned for Truckee's future, specifically over - development, traffic, and impacts to our
scenic viewsheds. This new draft General Plan includes development that would more than double
Truckee's population. We can't currently handle the influx of tourists during our high seasons,
especially on peak holidays. It is irresponsible to approve any increases in overall development
capacity at this time. The question that I would like the Town to answer - How can you justify
increasing development capacity given of our existing infrastructure limitations ( traffic, public transit,
groundwater supply, wildfire evacuation issues, etc)? I hope that you seriously consider what Truckee
will look like in 1200- years before you finalize this General Plan update.
Comment noted.
9
General Comments Name: Colleen Dalton
Affiliation: Visit Truckee-Tahoe PART 1
Visit Truckee Tahoe’s mission is to promote, protect and enhance Truckee as an authentic mountain
town. We serve our lodging business members, partner with key organizations, and balance our
actions for the well-being of our community.
Visit Truckee -Tahoe is supportive of the general direction, tone and spirit of the three Elements in the
2022 Draft 2040 General Plan regarding: Community Character, Economic Development, and
Conservation and Open Space Elements.
As a key partner organization, Town of Truckee shares Visit Truckee Tahoe’s common goal of
protecting Truckee's authenticity and community character for the benefit of all people living, working
and visiting here - now and in future years. To that end, year-round population growth and recent
spikes in visitation have heightened the urgency to identify not only new programs and services, as
mentioned in the Draft, but also basic infrastructure needed for the safety, security and well-being of
increased users on Town trails, paved paths, sidewalks, roads, and public parks.
The Sustainable Tourism section of the Draft Plan seeks to balance protection of Truckee's character,
authenticity, and natural beauty with a thriving tourism economy.
Some things for Council and Planning Commission to consider are:
Requesting Staff to review and become familiar with the Mountain IDEALS Sustainable Certification in
order to help inform the General Plan Sustainable Tourism section. This Certification is sanctioned by
the Global Sustainable Tourism Council GSTC) and is the framework that will be utilized for community
workshops and input on the Truckee Sustainability &
Action ED-3.A provides the opportunity to create a sustainable
tourism program; many of the comments provided could be
considered as part of this program creation.
Page 94
Item 7.1
10
General Comments Name: Colleen Dalton
Affiliation: Visit Truckee-Tahoe PART 2
Stewardship Plan this winter 2023. Other mountain Towns utilizing this framework include municipal
governments in partnership with tourism authorities at Jackson Hole, Breckenridge and Vail.
h1dgzfcsvudtt1prosriR:/ivod/o6egl4.KhmyleeGi9.EA/LRes/aU/8MLGQPrxMFwKxip4Z-nVi/g?=.
Consider adding a specific inventory of Truckee assets and attractions in order to help inform and
prioritize stewardship and use management plans. Consider broadening the physical boundaries
beyond municipal borders, to a perceived " Truckee"
geographical area so that key assets such as Rainbow Bridge can be included.
Consider including reference to supporting Truckee green business best practices and certifications by
sector. Other Suggestions for finding the right balance of promoting sustainable tourism while
managing local resources:
Inclusion of specific reference to Town of Truckee's Historic Downtown District and the Truckee
Cultural District, as designations by the state of California.
Inclusion of reference to the history of the Chinese culture and contribution.
Consider language that addresses how Truckee welcomes diversity, equity, inclusion and belonging of
all people.
Consider addressing workforce development for lower income, hospitality jobs needed for lodging,
restaurant, retail and recreation businesses as equally important to high income professions, in order
to sustain tourism dependent small businesses.
We Support Visit Truckee -Tahoe supports the addition of a town -wide comprehensive sign program
in the Community Character Element of the plan.
11
General Comment Name: Trixie Watson &
Alison Bermant Affiliation: Truckee
Resident
Please prioritize Truckee’s natural resources, scenic viewsheds, small- town character and
historical features over growth and development in the General Plan update process.
Comment noted.
12
General Comment Name: Jessica Abrams
Affiliation: Truckee Resident
Hello,
I would implore you, as you update the general plan, to please make decisions using an assumption
that every residence has full time occupants and the
impact of that on the planned infrastructure and services to ensure that we are able to truly maintain
and sustain the character of our fantastic
community. I'm seeing the changes in the difficulty to get a Dr appointment or a vet appointment or
swimming lessons and extracurricular activities for
my children. If we need to continue to grow our population, it should be aligned with the services
available
Thank you
Comment noted.
Action ED-3.A provides the opportunity to create a sustainable tourism program; many of the comments provided could be considered as part of this program creation.
Page 95
Item 7.1
Edit list for incorporation into next Draft 2040 General Plan
(Modifications to the June 2022 Draft 2040 General Plan)
September 19, 2022
Modification made in response to Council/Commission discussion and written
comments/questions are shown in green. Modifications made in response to all other written
public comments received—that are not already addressed by Council/Commission
modifications—are shown in blue. An additional new staff recommended actions is shown in
orange. This additional action is the result of on-going conversations with properties owners
impacted by the Gregory Creek floodplain in the Donner Lake area.
Draft Land Use Element
1. Modify Policy LU-1.1: Balance of Uses. Ensure a healthy balance of residential,
commercial, industrial, and open space land to adequately serve all Truckee residents,
the local workforce, and visitors and to reduce traffic impacts in the region. [Source: 2025
General Plan, Land Use Element, Policy P2.1, modified]
2. Modify Policy LU-1.4: Transition Freeway-Oriented Development. Continue to locate
Transition freeway-oriented commercial development only at the existing developed
interchanges with Interstate 80 at Donner Pass Road/Cold Stream Road and at State
Route 89 South to neighborhood-serving development. Ensure high-quality design for
freeway-oriented development in such areas. [Source: 2025 General Plan, Land Use
Element, Policy P3.1, and GPAC, Land Use Element, LU-9].
3. Add a new Action LU-1.F: “Replace Highway Commercial Zoning. Modify existing
Highway Commercial (CH) zoning to reflect corresponding land use designations.
[Source: New action].
Responsibility: Community Development Department
Time Frame: Short term”
4. Update Policy LU-2.4: Appropriate Location of Streamline Affordable Housing
Development. Use regulatory and voluntary tools to focus streamline affordable housing
development along existing and planned transit routes and near services and jobs.
[Source: New policy]
5. Add new Action LU-2.I: “Mobile Home Park Zoning. Conduct a public process to modify
existing zoning for mobile homes parks to Mobile Home Park (MHP) zoning. Research SB
330 implications and modify the Development Code and zoning map if determined
feasible. [Source: New action].
Responsibility: Community Development Department
Time Frame: Midterm”
6. Modify Policy LU-4.2: Replacement of Industrial. Land Require applicants requesting
amendments to industrial designations to other uses to provide equal adequate
replacement of industrial land. [Source: New policy]
Page 96
Item 7.1
Edit list for incorporation into next Draft 2040 General Plan
(Modifications to the June 2022 Draft 2040 General Plan)
September 19, 2022
7. Modify Policy LU-8.9: Clustered Development on Upper McIver Hill. Require clustered
development on Upper McIver Hill to maximize open space protection, minimize hillside
disturbance, eliminate risk of environmental hard to McIver Dairy meadow and limit
impacts on scenic viewsheds. [Source: New policy]
8. Modify Action LU-8.C: Tahoe Forest Hospital Master
Plan. Work with Tahoe Forest Hospital to develop a
comprehensive hospital campus master plan that
reduces its overall carbon footprint/greenhouse gas
emissions, maximizes opportunities for denser
development, employee housing on campus, trip
reduction, trip sharing, structured parking,
consolidation of jobs, and provision of “on-campus”
services to reduce employee trips. [Source: New
action]
Responsibility: Community Development
Department
Time Frame: Short term
9. Modify Policy LU-9.1: Variety of Uses in West River. Support a variety of uses in the
West River District to create a live/work/recreate district where the following uses are in
harmony:
o Industrial businesses continue to support a four-season economy while minimizing
impacts on surrounding uses and the environment;
o A mix of residential types provides housing for the workforce;
o Retail, lodging, and services uses activate the area; and
o Access to a restored Truckee River is provided for residents, employees, and
visitors. Maximize physical and visual access to a restored Truckee River.
o Safe routes for non-automotive modes of transportation. [Source: New policy]
10. Modify Policy LU-9.2: Truckee River Enhancement. Support the goals and principles of
the Truckee River Revitalization Strategy to protect and enhance the scenic quality of the
river and its riparian/river ecosystem, increase public access and river awareness., and
Eencourage appropriate development or redevelopment in the West River District
consistent with these goals and principles. [Source: GPAC, Land Use Element, LU-14,
modified]
11. Modify Policy LU-9.9: Public Access to Truckee River. Establish multiple a public access
points to and a parking area near the Truckee River. [Source: New policy]
12. Modify Policy LU-10.4: Water Quality Impacts to Donner Lake. Protect the water quality
of Donner Lake by minimizing stormwater runoff and erosion and preventing the
introduction and spread of Aquatic Invasive Species. [Source: New policy]
In response to Deirdre Henderson,
CAP Element Comment #2
Page 97
Item 7.1
Edit list for incorporation into next Draft 2040 General Plan
(Modifications to the June 2022 Draft 2040 General Plan)
September 19, 2022
13. Modify Action LU-10.A: Water Quality Impacts. Establish appropriate standards to
reduce impacts on the water quality of Donner Lake, including stormwater runoff and
erosion from new development. Prohibit the transport or introduction of Aquatic Invasive
Species into Donner Lake. [Source: New action]
Responsibility: Public Works Department, Community Development
Department
Time Frame: Short term
14. Modify Policy LU-10.5: Parking at Donner Lake. Address parking issues at Donner Lake,
including traffic to parking, through a variety of strategies including parking management
and improved bicycle, pedestrian, and transit facilities and services. [Source: New policy]
a. Modify Action LU-10.C: Donner Lake Parking District. Explore the creation of a
parking district to manage traffic to and parking surrounding Donner Lake. [Source:
New action]
Responsibility: Public Works Department, Community Development
Department
Time Frame: Midterm
15. Modify Policy LU-11.2: Retail and Mixed-Use Pedestrian-Scale Design. Design retail
shopping and mixed-use areas within the Gray’s Crossing area at a pedestrian scale,
incorporating pathways for both pedestrians and bikes, courtyards, and other activity
nodes, with a mix of shopping, offices, residences, and services. Large single building
forms and large masses of pavement are not considered consistent with this policy.
[Source: 2025 General Plan, Land Use Element, GC-P9, modified]
16. Modify Policy LU-11.3: Undeveloped Open Space. Maintain the undeveloped open
space character of the viewsheds along State Route 89 and Interstate 80 within the Gray’s
Crossing area consistent with the Gray’s Crossing Specific Plan. [Source: 2025 General
Plan, Land Use Element, GC-P5]
17. Add new Policy LU-12.11: “Extend Town Sphere. Extend the town’s sphere of influence
to better protect open space recreation and conservation beyond Truckee’s current
borders and to facilitate potential annexation of those lands. [Source: New Policy]”
18. Modify Action LU-12.A: Annexation Policies. Develop annexation policies, in
collaboration with Nevada County and the Nevada County Local Agency Formation
Commission (LAFCo), regarding annexation of property into the town for municipal
services. These policies shall address the following:
a. Require the consideration of annexation prior to, or in conjunction with, formal
consideration of development proposals so that the appropriate development
standards may be applied.
Page 98
Item 7.1
Edit list for incorporation into next Draft 2040 General Plan
(Modifications to the June 2022 Draft 2040 General Plan)
September 19, 2022
b. Annexation of development into the town should be revenue neutral. The Town
may pursue annexation of property where the cost of providing Town services
exceeds the revenue received based on a finding that the annexation will provide
an overriding benefit to the greater Truckee community.
c. Planned urban development outside of the town should be considered the most
appropriate for development and annexation to the town in the following order:
Areas within the boundaries of established water and sewer providers and where
provisions for services to the properties have been made
d. Areas within the boundaries of established water and sewer providers where
provisions for services to the properties have not been made
e. Areas outside of the boundaries of established water and sewer providers
f. The type and level of service provided in areas proposed to be annexed into the
town should be similar to those provided within the existing town boundaries.
g. Compact development, close to existing infrastructure, is most appropriate for
annexation to the town.
h. Annexation of resource lands or sparsely developed areas is generally appropriate
where it serves the town’s goals, including economic, recreational and/or
environmental goals not appropriate unless done in conjunction with the
annexation of development areas. [Source: 2025 General Plan, Land Use
Element, Action A8.2]
Responsibility: Community Development Department
Time Frame: Midterm
19. Modify Policy LU-12.1: Prevention of Uncontrolled Growth. Maintain a Sphere of
Influence, and actively work to modify the sphere as needed, to prevent uncontrolled
growth outside of the town limits and to protect areas with significant natural resources
and open space from development. [Source: New policy]
20. Add new Action LU-12.D: “Prosser Creek Annexation. Investigate annexation of Prosser
Creek from the dam to the confluence with the Truckee River in order to redesignate and
protect it as open space, consistent with its current use. [Source: New action]”
Responsibility: Community Development Department
Time Frame: Midterm”
21. Add new Action LU-1.E: “East River Street Zoning.
Evaluate rezoning existing high density residential-
zoned parcels on East River Street to Riverfront Mixed-
Use as a means to implement the Downtown River
Revitalization Strategy.
Responsibility: Community Development
Department
Time Frame: Midterm”
In response to Truckee River
Legacy Foundation, Housing
Element Comment #3 and
Council/Commission July 12, 2022
discussion.
Page 99
Item 7.1
Edit list for incorporation into next Draft 2040 General Plan
(Modifications to the June 2022 Draft 2040 General Plan)
September 19, 2022
22. Modify Action LU-4.A: Additional Industrial Land. Identify at least an additional five 10-
15 acres of land that is suitable for redevelopment or zoning for new industrial
development that can function as a buffer to ensure an adequate supply and avoid a
shortage of suitable land which could drive up the cost of development and act as a barrier
to economic development and business retention. Work with the Truckee Sanitary District,
Tahoe Truckee Sanitation Agency, and the Truckee Tahoe Airport District on the feasibility
of creating industrial land along Joerger Drive. [Source: 2020 BAE Study, modified]
Responsibility: Community Development Department
Time Frame: Short term
Draft Safety & Noise Element
1. Modify Policy SN-2.5: Removal of Flammable Invasive Species on Public Lands. Work
with the Nevada County Department of Agriculture, the Nevada County Resource
Conservation District and other stewardship groups and public land managers to remove
invasive and fire-spreading species (e.g., cheat grass) on public lands. [Source: New
policy, Climate Adaptation Plan, Goal 5, Strategy 5.2]
2. Modify Policy SN-2.6: Cooperative Fuel Management. Promote fire fuel reduction
through cooperative fuel management activities in association with the Truckee Fire
Protection District, the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE),
the US Forest Service, and other partners. Strategies may include reducing fuels on public
lands and identifying and implementing opportunities for fuel breaks between developed
areas and wildlands, forest mastication or mulching the forest floor to improve forest health
and biomass removal. Evaluate the use of biomass from fuel reduction efforts to produce
heat, power, landscape materials, or other forest products. [Source: 2025 General Plan,
Safety Element, Policy P4.3, modified]
3. Modify Action SN-2.D: Funding to Support Wildfire Risk Reduction. Work with the
Truckee Fire Protection District to pursue state and federal grant funds and/or develop a
sustainable funding source to provide financial incentives or assistance for residential
defensible space, home hardening, and fuels reduction work, particularly for lower- and
moderate-income households and mobile home/mobile home park owners. [Source: New
action, Climate Adaptation Plan, Goal 5, Strategy 5.10]
Responsibility: Office of Emergency Services
Time Frame: Ongoing
4. Modify Action SN-2.E: Fire-Adapted Landscaping
and Revegetation Standards. Update landscaping
and revegetation standards to be fire-adapted, in
coordination with the Truckee Fire Protection District,
including requiring use of fire-resistant planting and
prohibiting flammable landscaping plantings or
In response to TFPD, Safety and
Noise Element Comment #1
Page 100
Item 7.1
Edit list for incorporation into next Draft 2040 General Plan
(Modifications to the June 2022 Draft 2040 General Plan)
September 19, 2022
materials storage in the structure ignition zone (e.g.,
within 0–5 feet of the structure). Amend Development
Code landscaping standards to address vegetation
maturity in the required number of initial plantings and
vegetation location/spacing requirements. Include
additional amendments to address long-term
defensible space and wildfire protection for the life of
the landscaping. [Source: New action, OPR Fire
Hazard Planning Technical Advisory]
Responsibility: Community Development
Department
Time Frame: Short term
5. Modify Policy SN-6.4: Evacuation Road Width. Require any roads used for evacuation
purposes to have sufficient unobstructed pavement. Consider CalFire road width
requirements when designating evacuation routes. [Source: New policy]
6. Modify Policy SN-6.5: Alternative Routes during Interstate 80 Closures. Work with
Caltrans to develop a comprehensive plan to address Interstate 80 winter weather gridlock
and ensure appropriate emergency access routes. Coordinate with online mapping apps
to ensure public safety and that drivers are not directed to follow unpassable routes.
[Source: 2025 General Plan, Safety Element, Policy P7.1]
7. Modify Action SN-6.G: Post-Disaster Rebuilding Ordinance. Research and develop
general rules and procedures and amend the Development Code to streamline the
planning and permitting requirements for construction of temporary housing, or the
clearing and disposition of burnt trees/vegetation, or permanent rebuilding activities
following a major disaster, such as model emergency or urgency ordinances. [Source:
New action, OPR Fire Hazard Planning Technical Advisory]
Responsibility: Community Development Department
Time Frame: Short term
8. Modify Action SN-6.H: Emergency Displacement Contingency Plans. Coordinate with
local, regional, or state agencies to develop contingency plans for meeting the short-term,
temporary housing needs of those displaced during a catastrophic event as well as
clearing and disposition of burnt trees/vegetation and other related recovery work.
[Source: New action, OPR Fire Hazard Planning Technical Advisory]
Responsibility: Office of Emergency Services
Time Frame: Ongoing
9. Modify Policy SN-8.15: Temporary and on-going Outdoor Events and Activities. Limit
noise impacts from temporary outdoor events (e.g., neighborhood parties, outdoor music)
Page 101
Item 7.1
Edit list for incorporation into next Draft 2040 General Plan
(Modifications to the June 2022 Draft 2040 General Plan)
September 19, 2022
and on-going outdoor activities associated with a land use permit (e.g. weddings, concerts,
fundraisers) on nearby noise-sensitive uses. [Source: New policy, General Plan Advisory
Committee]
10. Modify Policy SN-8.17: Flyover Noise. Support the
efforts of the Truckee Tahoe Airport District to educate
pilots about appropriate flight paths and to hold them
accountable for using appropriate flight paths to
minimize flyovers of residential neighborhoods, and
other District efforts to monitor, minimize, reduce, and
mitigate airport noise. [Source: 2025 General Plan,
Noise Element, Policy P3.9]
11. Modify Policy SN-8.18: Future Airport Noise
Exposure. Ensure Cooperate with the Truckee Tahoe
Airport District actions, including pursuit of land use
entitlements and modifications to long-range plans, to
coordinate long range planning and land use
regulations that minimize community noise exposure
associated with airport operations while meet Town
goals concerning provision of housing and other uses.
[Source: 2025 General Plan, Noise Element, Policy
P3.10]
12. Modify Policy SN-8.19: Additional Construction Noise Control Measures. Require the
following additional construction noise control measures at construction sites where
construction activity, excluding single-family construction, would take place outside of the
timeframes exempt from the noise standards established in the Town Development Code
and is anticipated to generate exterior noise levels at sensitive receptors that exceed the
applicable nighttime noise standards of 50 Leq or 70 Lmax.
a. Temporary noise barriers, such as curtains, piled snow, or hay bales.
b. Noise-reducing enclosures and techniques around stationary noise generating
equipment (e.g., concrete mixers, generators, compressors) to break the line of
sight between the noise source and receiver.
c. Operation of heavy-duty construction equipment at the lowest operating power
possible. [Source: New policy]
Draft Mobility Element
1. Update Figure M-1 to show roundabouts that are needed to replace signals (Truckee
Way/I-80 EB, DPR/89S, DPR/Northwoods, Brockway/Palisades, and potential minor
roundabouts in Gateway).
2. Modify Table M-2:
a. Remove SR 89N/ Rainbow improvement.
In response to David
Diamond/Mary Hetherington,
Safety and Noise Element
Comment #14
In response to David
Diamond/Mary Hetherington,
Safety and Noise Element
Comment #14
Page 102
Item 7.1
Edit list for incorporation into next Draft 2040 General Plan
(Modifications to the June 2022 Draft 2040 General Plan)
September 19, 2022
b. Eliminate SR 267 widening/remove 4 lanes on SR 267 in Placer County and
between Brockway Road and I-80 and add note that widening of SR 267 in Placer
County will be evaluated by Placer County in consultation with the Resort Triangle
Transportation Plan and other applicable guidelines and policies.
3. Modify Table M-3 title: Length of Sidewalk and Bikeway Facilities by Classification in 2020.
4. Modify Table M-4 Separated Bikeway/Cycle Track (Class IV) description: Separated
bikeways are on-street facilities for the exclusive use of bicycles. They are physically
separated from motorized vehicle traffic with concrete curbs, bollards, or other vertical
elements and can allow for one-way or two-way bike travel. However, maintenance of
Class IV would require additional equipment investment and ongoing staff resources
because of they are a challenge to maintain during the winter because of snow removal
operations challenges.
5. Update text on page 4-10: This tax was renewed is scheduled to expire if not renewed by
voters prior to June 2024. The measure is currently scheduled to be placed on the June
2022 ballot for consideration by Truckee voters. If passed, it will which increased the tax
percentage from 0.25 percent to 0.5 percent and is will be authorized until ended by voters.
6. Add text referencing TART Connect on page 4-12: “A pilot program for on-demand
microtransit, TART Connect, was operated during the summer of 2022 and was very
successful. The Town is exploring ways to include this program on a more permanent
basis in annual transit operations.”
7. Modify text on page 4-14: The Town is currently exploring options for year round
microtransit service to provide neighborhood feeder services and systemwide
opportunities. Microtransit is a form of on-demand transit service available to the general
public that typically is booked and dispatched via a mobile app. Microtransit offers highly
flexible routing and/or scheduling of smaller vehicles shared with other passengers.
Microtransit could prove to be effective in providing long-planned neighborhood
connectivity solutions and increasing the overall attractiveness of transit to a broader
range of users. TART Connect was a successful summer program and would be ideal to
continue year round.
8. Modify Action M-1.A: Transportation Demand Management Program. Develop an
employee threshold (e.g., more than 50 employees) above which transportation demand
management measures would be required for new nonresidential development projects
and develop a context appropriate “toolbox” of TDM measures to be used as project
requirements for such projects. Conduct preliminary outreach with large employers to
identify the most appropriate and effective TDM measures for Truckee businesses and
their employees informed by work schedules and place of residence. TDM measures
could include, but are not limited to:
a. parking discounts, rewards, and cash-out or time-off incentive programs;
b. unbundled parking strategies or shared parking agreements;
c. long-term bicycle parking, on-site lockers, and showers;
Page 103
Item 7.1
Edit list for incorporation into next Draft 2040 General Plan
(Modifications to the June 2022 Draft 2040 General Plan)
September 19, 2022
d. flexible, staggered, and/or coordinated work schedules, and communal work
space and telework programs;
e. subsidized transit passes, a vanpool program;
f. ridesharing/ride-matching services, guaranteed ride home program; or
g. designated employee transportation coordinator. Work with existing and future
businesses, the Tahoe Truckee Unified School District, and major public and
nonprofit employers (e.g., local agencies) to expand the use of TDM measures that
divert automobile commute trips to transit, walking, bicycling, or digital/remote
working and incentivize carpool and multi-passenger trips for regional commutes.
[Source: New action]
Responsibility: Public Works Department
Time Frame: Midterm
9. Modify Action M-1.E: Transportation Network Company Greenhouse Gas
Reductions. Develop a strategy to work with Transportation Network Companies (TNCs)
(e.g., Uber, Lyft), car-sharing services, and other transportation service companies to
reduce greenhouse gas emissions through curb space management and by providing
electric vehicle (EV) charging stations at strategic locations. and Rreduce deadhead VMT,
which is VMT associated with TNC drivers searching for new passengers. [Source: New
action]
Responsibility: Public Works Department
Time Frame: Midterm
10. Modify Action M-1.F: Electric Vehicle and Bike Charging Stations. Provide electric
vehicle and bike charging stations at Town facilities and throughout Truckee with free
charging and/or free parking. Work with partner agencies and private businesses to
expand the charging station network. Incentivize electric vehicle purchases and use by
providing free or low-cost charging. Collaborate with utility providers to provide
incentive/rebate for this purpose. [Source: New action]
Responsibility: Public Works Department
Time Frame: Ongoing
11. Modify Policy M-2.1: Truckee Trails and Bikeways Master Plan. Maintain, and
implement, and update the Truckee Trails and Bikeways Master Plan to continue to
expand the town’s interconnected system of multiuse paths, bike lanes, trails, and
sidewalks throughout the community that is safe and accessible to all users, including
children, persons with disabilities, and seniors. Update the plan every 5-10 years to ensure
the plan continuously reflects changing community need. [Source: 2025 General Plan,
Mobility Element, Policy 10.2 and 10.3, modified]
12. Modify Policy M-2.3: Safe and Continuous Routes. Link new trails and bikeways with
established bikeways, parks, and open space areas to provide safe and continuous
routes, especially near mobile home parks and multi-family apartments, to serve low-
income and underserved populations. Enhance connections between adjacent land uses
Page 104
Item 7.1
Edit list for incorporation into next Draft 2040 General Plan
(Modifications to the June 2022 Draft 2040 General Plan)
September 19, 2022
and between different parts of Truckee, including Downtown. [Source: 2025 General Plan,
Mobility Element, Policy 10.5, modified]
13. Modify Action M-2.K: Bicycle and Trail Promotion. Continue to work with partner
organizations like the Truckee Trails Foundation, US Forest Service, Truckee Donner
Land Trust, Visit Truckee Tahoe, and Truckee Donner Recreation and Park District to
promote development of appropriate bicycle and trail facilities and signage and to develop
a comprehensive outreach strategy to increase the percentage of local trips made by
biking and walking. [Source: 2025 General Plan, Mobility Element, Policy 10. 9, modified]
Responsibility: Climate Action Team
Time Frame: Ongoing
14. Modify Action M-2.M: Bicycle Parking. Work with Truckee business owners, the Truckee
Chamber of Commerce, and Truckee Downtown Merchants Association to increase short-
and long-term bicycle parking at strategic locations that support multi-modal trips and
consider the conversion of existing parking spaces to bike parking or bike-share facilities.
Ensure that bicycle parking locations are closer and more convenient than vehicle parking
options. [Source: New action]
Responsibility: Climate Action Team and Community Development Department
Time Frame: Midterm
15. Modify Action M-2.P: E-Bike Trail Use. Monitor the development of state and federal
standards and evaluate current design standards to accommodate certain classes of e-
bikes on major multi-use bikeways and trails. Amend the Trails and Bikeways Master Plan
and the Municipal Code, as necessary. Where feasible, redesign existing trails to
accommodate emerging technologies to reduce conflicts and provide for a wide variety of
users. Investigate e-bike safety, the need for any corresponding municipal code revisions
and e-bike safety education to ensure continued trail safety for all users. [Source: New
action]
Responsibility: Public Works Department
Time Frame: Ongoing
16. Modify Policy M-3.2: Transit for Vulnerable, Underserved, and Underrepresented
Groups. Make a diligent effort to eEngage and incorporate the transit needs of children,
seniors, disabled, low-income, vulnerable, and transit-dependent persons in making
decisions regarding transit services and compliance with the ADA and Title VI of the Civil
Rights Act. [Source: 2025 General Plan, Mobility Element, Policy 11.4, modified]
17. Modify Policy M-3.3: Multi-Modal Transfer Facilities. Encourage the development of
facilities that accommodate and allow convenient transfers between different modes of
transport, especially to provide connections to rail and local and regional bus service.
Consider the need for bike racks and secure bike lockers in convenient locations. [Source:
2025 General Plan, Mobility Element, Policy 11.5]
18. Modify Policy M-3.5: Intelligent Transportation Systems. Plan for the anticipated growth
of shared and on-demand ride mobility services (e.g., transit, microtransit, ride-, car-, and
Page 105
Item 7.1
Edit list for incorporation into next Draft 2040 General Plan
(Modifications to the June 2022 Draft 2040 General Plan)
September 19, 2022
bike-sharing, e-hailing). Install intelligent transportation system infrastructure to support
traveler information such as real-time Next Bus transit arrival technology, travel time
information, and wayfinding. [Source: New policy, IG Strategy D.6.a]
19. Modify Policy M-3.8: Bus Shelters and Passenger Amenities. Design new ADA-
accessible bus and van/shuttle stops and shelters and where feasible, include bicycle
racks and bicycle maintenance stations, lighting, and animal-resistant trash and recycling
stations, to the maximum extent practicable. Incorporate security features and technology
to ensure stops and shelters are safe, inviting and routinely accessible during operating
hours for all services. Maximize opportunities to incorporate rider information Consider
ways to incorporate rider information and real-time transit vehicle location and estimated
time of arrival NextBus information. [Source: New policy]
20. Modify Policy M-3.9: Low/No-Emissions Transit
Fleets. Work with local and regional special districts,
agencies, community partners and businesses with
large vehicle fleets to encourage conversion
Transition the local and regional transit fleets to no- or
low- and zero-emissions vehicles such as electric or
hybrid buses or renewable-diesel fueled. In
collaboration with electric utilities, explore using
electric fleet batteries for back-up and supplemental
energy. [Source: New policy]
21. Modify Action M-3.B: Long Range Transit Plan. Maintain, implement, and update
Truckee’s Long Range Transit Plan that anticipates a series of improvements and
expansion plans and capital facilities, including:
a. increased reduced headways on all transit routes;
b. connection points that consider all modes;
c. expanded and enhanced dial-a-ride programs for on-call and ADA rides through
better ride scheduling and booking technology; and
d. new neighborhood connection routes in critical places such as Tahoe Donner,
Prosser lakeview, Donner Lake and Glenshire, including bus shelters, local and
regional mobility hub centers, and service expansion. [Source: New action]
Responsibility: Public Works Department
Time Frame: Short term
22. Modify Action M-3.C: Develop New Funding Mechanisms for Transit Capital and
Operations. Work with neighboring jurisdictions to develop funding mechanisms to
maintain existing levels of service through available funding sources and to support future
transit service expansion for Truckee’s projected resident and visitor populations,
consistent with the Short and Long Range Transit Plans. Evaluate the likelihood of
developing a local “self-help” funding mechanism for consideration by Truckee voters.
[Source: New action]
Responsibility: Public Works Department
In response to Deirdre Henderson,
CAP Element Comment #4
Page 106
Item 7.1
Edit list for incorporation into next Draft 2040 General Plan
(Modifications to the June 2022 Draft 2040 General Plan)
September 19, 2022
Time Frame: Ongoing
23. Modify Action M-3.D: Grant Funding for Transit Services. Pursue all available sources
of funding for capital and operating costs of transit services from including but not limited
to the Federal Transit Administration and the State of California. Consider ongoing funding
through major developers such as the assessment districts formed for the Coldstream
Specific Plan, Joerger Ranch Specific Plan, and Railyard Master Plan. [Source: 2025
General Plan, Mobility Element, Policy 11.2, modified]
Responsibility: Public Works Department
Time Frame: Ongoing
24. Modify Action M-3.E: Placer County and Tahoe Truckee Unified School District
Partnership. Partner with Placer County and the Tahoe Truckee Unified School District ,
and coordinate with special districts, to provide extensive outreach and education to local
schools and explore opportunities to coordinate ridesharing and bell times with the
regional network, continue a fare-free system, connect to after-school activities, and
provide bike storage and safe routes to school to increase ridership and eliminate barriers
to last-mile travel. [Source: New action]
Responsibility: Public Works Department
Time Frame: Short term
25. Modify Action M-3.F: Community Outreach and Marketing Campaign. Work with Keep
Truckee Green, local community organizations, Tahoe Truckee Area Regional Transit
(TART), Truckee North Tahoe Transportation Management Association (TMA), and other
partners to develop a community-led marketing campaign focused on increasing transit
ridership and promoting the community benefits and equity considerations inherent in
transit planning. Conduct community outreach to identify the largest barriers to increasing
transit ridership and develop a strategy to remove these barriers. [Source: New action]
Responsibility: Climate Action Team
Time Frame: Short term
26. Modify Policy M-3.I: Bus Shelter Requirements. Amend the Development Code to
identify bus shelter requirements for new major developments. Require new bus shelters
to be ADA accessible and, where feasible, include bicycle racks, bicycle maintenance
stations, lighting, and animal-resistant trash and recycling stations. [Source: New action]
Responsibility: Public Works Department
Time Frame: Midterm
27. Modify Action M-3.J: Real-Time Travel Technologies. Work with TART to explore
offering real time arrival installing “next bus” technologies for transit riders and real travel
time and road conditions information for the general public. by including the installation of
conduit to support broadband and fiber optic infrastructure. [Source: New action, IG
Strategy D.6.b]
Page 107
Item 7.1
Edit list for incorporation into next Draft 2040 General Plan
(Modifications to the June 2022 Draft 2040 General Plan)
September 19, 2022
Responsibility: Public Works Department
Time Frame: Midterm
28. Modify Action M-3.K: First-Last Mile Gap Analysis. Work with active transportation
organizations and other stakeholders to conduct a first-last mile gap analysis for the town’s
transit system and identify key strategies to remove first-last mile issues for transit riders.
Strategies could include increasing bike share, microtransit, and bike parking at transit
stations; increasing vehicle parking at transit stops and neighborhood nodes; increasing
signage and wayfinding; and increasing infrastructure for walking and biking (e.g., bike
lanes, bike parking, sidewalks, crosswalks). [Source: New action]
Responsibility: Public Works Department
Time Frame: Midterm Ongoing
29. Add a new Action M-3.O: “Pursue Broadband and Fiber Optic Conduit Options.
Explore the installation of broadband and fiber optic conduit to support real-time travel
technologies.
Responsibility: Public Works Department
Time Frame: Midterm”
30. Add new Action M-3.P to support Policy M-3.9: “Low/No Emission Transit Fleet
Transition Plan. Develop a low/no emission transit fleet transition plan and that considers
both rolling stock and infrastructure required to meet current and future transit demand
and service plans in coordination with the Nevada County Transportation Commission.
This will also require close coordination with both regional private and public transit
providers to ensure integration and compatibility as well as emergency preparedness.
[Source: New action]
Responsibility: Public Works Department
Time Frame: Short term”
31. Add new Action M-3-Q: “Transit Evacuation Guide. Develop a guide for transit activity in
the event of wildfire, flood or other emergency.[Source: New action]
Responsibility: Public Works Department
Time Frame: Short term”
32. Modify Goal M-4: Traffic Operations. Provide a safe, efficient, and well-designed
roadway network and maintain acceptable traffic operations through application of vehicle
miles traveled and level of service thresholds and by conditioning new development to
make necessary improvements. including those for emergency access, and develop
programs to address projected traffic levels. [Source: 2025 General Plan, Mobility
Element, Goal 1 and Goal 2, and GPAC Framework, M-4, modified]
33. Modify Policy M-4.2: Consideration of Climatic Conditions. Ensure that existing and
future roadway, sidewalk, and bikeway standards, and the implementation of such
standards, take Truckee's climatic and geographic conditions and resiliency (such as
Page 108
Item 7.1
Edit list for incorporation into next Draft 2040 General Plan
(Modifications to the June 2022 Draft 2040 General Plan)
September 19, 2022
heavy snow fall and steep and varied terrain) into account as well as all users, including
children, persons with disabilities, and seniors. [Source: 2025 General Plan, Mobility
Element, Policy 1.5]
34. Add a new sentence to pp. 4-16 under Truckee Tahoe Airport District: The Truckee Tahoe
Airport is located in unincorporated Nevada County at the southeastern edge of Truckee
and is operated by the Truckee Tahoe Airport District. The Truckee Tahoe Airport Land
Use Compatibility Plan applies safety regulations to lands in Nevada County, Placer
County, and Truckee. The airport is a general aviation facility, with primarily small,
privately owned piston and light turbine aircraft service for the North Lake Tahoe region .
Multiple Private charter services also offer on demand flights which, in combination with
greater airport flight traffic, has increased overall jet traffic and associated noise.
35. General edit: there is emphasis and Glenshire and Tahoe Donner—add references to
other neighborhoods.
36. Modify Policy M-4.7: Roadway Improvements. Continue to implement improvements to
the town’s roadway network, as identified in the circulation diagram in Figure M-1 and in
Table M-2 or the Traffic Impact Fee Program to ensure the access and mobility needs of
existing and future residents and visitors can be adequately served under the
circumstances. [Source: 2025 General Plan, Mobility Element, Policy 1.2, modified]
37. Modify Policy M-5.3: Street Lighting. When installing new road lighting or replacing
existing lighting, fixtures that minimize energy use and light pollution without compromising
public safety shall be used. Employ LED low emissions lighting and use of solar or other
technologies to minimize greenhouse gas emissions with street lighting. [Source: 2025
General Plan, Mobility Element, Policy 6.7, modified]
38. Modify Policy M-5.6: Roadway Widths. Maintain roadways in Truckee at a maximum of
two travel lanes, including State Route (SR) 267 between Interstate 80 and the Brockway
Road/Soaring Way intersection. Exceptions to this policy include Interstate 80, and SR 89
South, and SR 267 from Truckee Airport Road/Shaffer Mill Road to Brockway
Road/Soaring Way. In addition, maintain Donner Pass Road and Brockway Road as a
three-lane cross section (two lanes of traffic with a left-turn lane). [Source: 2025 General
Plan, Mobility Element, Policy 6.3, 6.4, and 6.5, combined]
39. Add new Action M-5.C: “Street Light Replacement Program. Create a street light
replacement program to convert existing street lights and encourage other street light
owners to do the same. [Source: New action]
Responsibility: Community Development Department; Public Works
Department
Time Frame: Midterm”
40. M-6.1 Traffic Impact Fee Charge a traffic impact fee that is set in direct proportion to the
level of impact identified in a circulation (including traffic and safety) impact analysis, so
as to ensure that the actual cost of improvements demanded individually or cumulatively
Page 109
Item 7.1
Edit list for incorporation into next Draft 2040 General Plan
(Modifications to the June 2022 Draft 2040 General Plan)
September 19, 2022
by a project can be met. Such fees shall be applied to improvements needed to increase
the capacity of the transportation system roadway network including:
a. improvements listed in Table M-2;
b. State Transportation Improvement Projects (STIP) projects identified in Caltrans'
and the Nevada County Transportation Commission’s Regional Transportation
Plans;
c. improvements such as widening of travel lanes to improve safety, meet Town
engineering standards and to add local and regional transit facilities, Class II and
III bike facilities, sidewalks, or other bike or pedestrian improvements; and
d. other improvements identified by the Town needed to reduce delays and improve
safety at railroad crossings and to increase the capacity of the transportation
roadway system, including those determined to be needed through updates to the
Traffic Impact Fee Program and development of the Downtown Traffic Study.
[Source: 2025 General Plan, Mobility Element, Policy 5.1, modified]
41. Modify Policy M-8.3: Adequate Ground
Transportation for the Airport Work with the Truckee
Tahoe Airport to provide for adequate ground access to
the airport that also minimizes impacts to the
surrounding roadway system by encouraging alternative
modes such as bicycles and transit in transportation
planning and improvements. [Source: 2025 General
Plan, Mobility Element, Policy 13.2]
Conservation and Open Space Element
1. Modify Policy COS-1.1: Increase in Amount of
Protected Open Space. Support means to protect new
open space, including Encourage public/private
partnerships, transfer of development rights, land
acquisition, or other means to protect new open space
in pristine large open space areas, biological resource
areas, or other areas found to have significant
environmental value. [Source: GPAC General Plan
Framework, Goal COS-15, modified]
2. Modify Action COS-1.C: Mapping of Open Space and Natural Resources. Develop a
Continue to update the Town’s GIS-based system to catalog, map, and evaluate open
space resources in Truckee and its vicinity. The maps and associated database should
incorporate all available data, including topography and natural features, biological
resources, current land use, protection status, ownership, and connections such as roads
and trails. Update the database regularly to ensure it includes information that is as current
as possible. [Source: 2025 General Plan, Conservation and Open Space Element, Action
A1.3, modified]
In response to Leigh Chavez,
Mobility Element Comment #16
In response to Ruth Miller, COS
Element Comment #4; and MAP
COS Comment #11
Page 110
Item 7.1
Edit list for incorporation into next Draft 2040 General Plan
(Modifications to the June 2022 Draft 2040 General Plan)
September 19, 2022
Responsibility: Community Development Department, Public Works Department
Time Frame: Short term
3. Modify Action COS-1.4: Open Space Preservation Criteria. Adhere to the following
criteria for open space preserved through direct actions of the Town, through open space
and clustered development requirements and incentives, and through the development
review process:
o preserve open space that, to the greatest possible extent, occurs in large blocks and
is contiguous and connected;
o provide the greatest possible level of public access while respecting private property
rights, sensitive habitat values, and safety concerns;
o provide maximum benefit in terms of habitat preservation; and
o enhance the overall character of Truckee as a scenic mountain community.;
o Maximize carbon sequestration. [Source: 2025 General Plan, Conservation and Open
Space Element, Policy P1.5, modified]
4. Modify Action COS-1.A: Partnerships with Open Space Conservation Groups. Create
a committee to work with open space conservation groups, including the Truckee Donner
Land Trust, to support their efforts to acquire and manage open space lands. [Source:
2025 General Plan, Conservation and Open Space Element, Policy P1.3, modified]
Responsibility: Community Development Department
Time Frame: Short term
5. Modify Policy COS-3.1: Biological Resource Open
Space. Preserve and improve the integrity and
continuity of biological resource open space areas,
including sensitive habitat and wildlife movement
corridors, through permanent open space protection
and restoration. When reviewing development
proposals, consider:
o sensitive habitat and wildlife movement
corridors in the areas adjacent to development
sites, as well as on the development site itself;
o prevention of habitat fragmentation and loss of
connectivity;
o use of appropriate protection measures for
sensitive habitat areas such as non-
disturbance easements and open space
zoning;
o off-site habitat restoration as a potential
mitigation, provided that no net loss of habitat
value results; and
In response to Richard Anderson,
COS Element Comment #10
Page 111
Item 7.1
Edit list for incorporation into next Draft 2040 General Plan
(Modifications to the June 2022 Draft 2040 General Plan)
September 19, 2022
o potential mitigation or elimination of impacts
through mandatory clustering of development
or project redesign.
o the effect of summer and autumn water
demand on groundwater-dependent
ecosystems and surface waters. [Source: 2025
General Plan, Conservation and Open Space
Element, Policy P4.1 and P4.2, combined]
6. Add new policy COS-3.8: “Ground and Surface
Water Protection. Protect groundwater-dependent
ecosystems and surface waters through participation
in regional planning efforts, such as updates to the
Martis Valley Groundwater Management Plan, that
might affect these natural resources. [Source: New
policy]”
7. Add new Action COS-3.E: “Gregory Creek Floodplain. Explore floodplain management
and/or floodplain modification options in support of property redevelopment for parcels
currently impacted by mapped Gregory Creek floodplain. [Source: New action]”
Responsibility: Community Development Department
Time Frame: Midterm
8. Modify Action COS-5.A: Identification of Existing Critical Erosion Problems and
Pursue Funding. Work with the Truckee River Watershed Council and Lahontan Regional
Water Quality Control Board to identify existing critical erosion problems, such as unpaved
parking areas along Donner Lake, and to pursue funding to resolve these problems.
[Source: 2025 General Plan, Conservation and Open Space Element, Action A12.1]
Responsibility: Public Works Department
Time Frame: Ongoing
9. Modify Policy COS-6.4: Support Integrated Forestry
Planning and Management Activities Opposition to
Clear Cutting. Support forest management actions that
consider the management of the ecosystem.
Collaborate with landowners and regulators on
improving forest health through actions that balance
wildfire protection with ecological, economic and social
sustainability. Educate the community on the benefits of
restored forest ecology by way of fuels reduction, fire-
tolerant/resistant tree species, buffer areas/fuel breaks,
etc. Oppose commercial timber harvesting that involves
clear cutting in Truckee and in visually and biologically
In response to Ruth Miller, COS
Element Comment #6 and
Michael/Heather Llewellyn Safety
and Noise Comment #16
In response to Richard Anderson,
COS Element Comment #10
Page 112
Item 7.1
Edit list for incorporation into next Draft 2040 General Plan
(Modifications to the June 2022 Draft 2040 General Plan)
September 19, 2022
sensitive areas of the Planning Area. [Source: 2025
General Plan, Conservation and Open Space Element,
Policy P7.6] [Source: New policy]
10. Modify Policy COS-8.2: Paving of Roads to Offset Emissions. Require new
developments, including subdivisions, to pave existing nonpaved roads planned to serve
the new development to the extent necessary and feasible to offset PM10 emissions
generated by traffic from the development. New nonpaved roads shall not be allowed for
new development and subdivisions. New paving shall take into consideration the policies
under Goal COS-7 concerning minimization of impacts to water quality and groundwater
recharge that may result from increases in paved areas. [Source: 2025 General Plan,
Conservation and Open Space Element, Policy P13.2, modified]
11. Add new Action COS-8.B: “Anti-Idling Program.
Evaluate the development of a voluntary anti-idling
program and/or enforcement ordinance that focuses on
idling at commercial centers, commercial districts and
school zones, and areas adjacent to other sensitive
receptors and vulnerable populations such as Tahoe
Forest Hospital. [New Action]
Responsibility: Community Development
Department
Time Frame: Midterm”
12. Add a new paragraph to the water resources
discussion, “Water supplied to existing and new
development in Truckee comes almost entirely from
the Martis Valley Groundwater Basin. Groundwater
pumping during periods of high demand and low
recharge (summer and autumn) has the potential to
harm beneficial uses provided by groundwater-
dependent ecosystems and groundwater-influenced
surface waters. Protection of these beneficial uses
from groundwater pumping is an objective of the State
of California through its Sustainable Groundwater
Management Act, signed into law in 2014.”
13. Add new Action COS-10.B: Pursue Single-Use Plastic Reduction. Investigate townwide
reduction of single-use plastic sales and use, including water bottles and other single-use
beverage containers. [Source: New action]
Responsibility: Keep Truckee Green
Time Frame: Midterm
In response to Ruth Miller, COS
Element Comment #7
In response to Richard Anderson,
COS Element Comment #10
Page 113
Item 7.1
Edit list for incorporation into next Draft 2040 General Plan
(Modifications to the June 2022 Draft 2040 General Plan)
September 19, 2022
Climate Action Plan
1. Amend Appendix B, Table B-4: change 80% industrial to 20% multifamily and 80% office.
2. Add to Appendix B:
Scenario Populatio
n1
Househol
ds2
Residentia
l Dwelling
Units3
Commerci
al (sq. ft.)4
Office
(sq. ft.)5
Industrial
(sq. ft.)5 Jobs6
2018
(Existing
Condition
s)
16,400 6,600 13,400 1,073,000 604,000 931,000 7,600
2030 (CAP
Target
Year)
18,300 7,400 15,100 1,210,200 682,100 994,300 8,200
2040
(General
Plan
Horizon
Year)
20,100 8,100 16,600 1,336,400 747,200 1,047,100 8,800
Growth
(2018-
2040)
3,700 1,500 3,200 263,400 143,200 116,100 1,200
2045 (CAP
Target
Year)
21,000 8,500 17,400 1,404,000 779,800 1,073,400 9,100
2050 (CAP
Target
Year)
22,000 8,800 18,200 1,474,600 812,300 1,099,800 9,400
Notes: Numbers rounded to the nearest 100.
1 Existing population based on 2018 DOF estimates. Population projections based on the 2000-2019 population AAGR
of 0.9 percent. Full buildout population is based on a household size of 2.48201.
2 Existing households is based on 2018 DOF estimates. Household projections are based on the 2000-2019 household
AAGR of 1.0 percent through 2030 and reduced to 0.9 percent after 2030 based on the assumption that the ratio of
persons to occupied housing units will stabilize after 2030 (BAE 2020 and 2021). Full buildout households is estimated
based on full buildout of 19,318 residential dwelling units.
3 Existing residential dwelling units based on the 2018 model land uses from LSC. Residential dwelling unit projections
are calculated based on household projections, a 5 percent vacancy rate, and a second home market
(seasonal/vacation use) demand equal to 49.5 percent of the housing stock. (American Community Survey; 5-year
estimates; Table B25002 and Table B25004)
Page 114
Item 7.1
Edit list for incorporation into next Draft 2040 General Plan
(Modifications to the June 2022 Draft 2040 General Plan)
September 19, 2022
4 Existing commercial square footage is based on 2018 model land uses from LSC. Commercial projections are
calculated using a per resident retail square foot demand of 48.46 and a 1.5 visitor spending factor.
5 Existing office and industrial square footage is based on 2018 model land uses from LSC. Office and industrial
projections are calculated based on a 2040 new office square footage demand of 143,234 square feet and a 2040 new
industrial square footage demand of 116,053 square feet (BAE 2020: Table 20).
6 Existing jobs is based on U.S. Census OnTheMap data. Job projections apply the following square footage per
employee ratios to the new development capacity: 500 commercial sq ft per employee; 250 office sq ft per employee;
800 industrial sq ft per employee.
Source: Ascent 2022.
3. Add new stand-alone introductory call-out bubble on pp. CAP page 9-1: The Town is being
a leader in climate resilience through our General Plan commitments. Climate adaptation
is a human, environmental and economic imperative and the Town is purposeful in
accelerating climate change adaptation through implementation of intentional goals,
policies and actions.
4. Modify the first CAP Guiding Principle: Make Truckee
more resilient to the impacts of climate change
through a leadership in environmental conservation,
and sustainability, and climate mitigation and
adaptation strive to and reduce the town's impact on
the local and global environment.
Responsibility: Community Development Department
Time Frame: Midterm
5. Modify Action CAP-6.A: Carbon Sequestration. Quantify existing carbon sequestration
values and work with land conservation organizations (e.g., Truckee Donner Land Trust)
and coordinate with local, regional, and state agencies to identify opportunities to preserve
open space areas, plant additional tree corridors, restore degraded meadows, and
manage vegetation to increase the sequestration of carbon. Evaluate the feasibility of
creating re-forestation sites that could be used as receiver sites for development projects
with substantial mature native tree removal and amend the Development Code to require
or allow off-site tree replacement. [Source: New action]
Responsibility: Assistant to the Town Manager
Time Frame: Midterm
6. Modify Policy CAP-7.1: Renewable Energy
Sources. Support utility providers in achieving 100
percent renewable energy by increasing renewable
energy sources, including renewable electricity,
renewable natural gas, and geothermal energy.
Support regional efforts to develop renewable energy
In response to Deirdre Henderson,
CAP Element Comment #2
In response to Deirdre Henderson,
CAP Element Comment #6
Page 115
Item 7.1
Edit list for incorporation into next Draft 2040 General Plan
(Modifications to the June 2022 Draft 2040 General Plan)
September 19, 2022
sources and supportive funding opportunities.
[Source: New policy]
7. Modify Policy CAP-7.5: Building Energy Retrofit Program. Develop and implement a
comprehensive building energy retrofit program for residential and non-residential
buildings, including lighting retrofits, to improve energy efficiency and increase
electrification in existing buildings. [Source: New policy]
8. Modify Action CAP-7.A: Building Energy Retrofit Program. Work with energy providers,
including the Truckee Donner Public Utility District (TDPUD) and Liberty Utilities, to
develop a comprehensive building electrification and energy efficiency retrofit program by
2024. Offer incentives, financing mechanisms, and technical assistance and conduct initial
energy audits to facilitate appliance upgrades, building envelope improvements (e.g.,
insulation, window upgrades), and lighting and heating, ventilation, and cooling (HVAC)
system replacements. As part of the program:
a. identify opportunities to pilot projects with participating residents and businesses
to provide an example of potential savings that can be achieved through the
program;
b. collaborate with local property assessed clean energy providers to help finance
larger retrofit projects;
c. identify and incorporate funding options and subsidies for residents, including
enhanced options for low-income households to ensure equitable participation in
the program; and
d. strive to achieve a 20 percent reduction in energy consumption in existing
residential uses and a 15 percent reduction in existing nonresidential uses by
2030.
e. establish additional 2035 and 2040 energy consumption reduction targets.
f. work with relevant stakeholders (e.g.-the Contractor’s Association of Truckee
Tahoe, local equipment vendors, Truckee Donner Public Utility District, and others)
to provide local training and workshops for energy efficiency upgrades and existing
building decarbonization practices. [Source: New action]
Responsibility: Community Development Department, Assistant to the Town
Manager
Time Frame: Short term
9. Modify Action CAP-7.B: Renewable Natural Gas Supply. Work with Southwest Gas,
other municipalities and other relevant stakeholders, beginning in 2022, to develop a
timeline with specific targets to increase the supply of renewable natural gas to Truckee
residents. Explore the costs and benefits of various pathways to providing renewable
natural gas to Truckee residents and pursue the most cost-effective path that still achieves
GHG reductions. Strive to achieve a the use of 25 percent greenhouse gas reduction in
renewable natural gas by 2030. Set reduction targets for 2035 and 2040 and explore
reliable alternatives to natural gas. [Source: New action]
Page 116
Item 7.1
Edit list for incorporation into next Draft 2040 General Plan
(Modifications to the June 2022 Draft 2040 General Plan)
September 19, 2022
Responsibility: Assistant to the Town Manager
Time Frame: Short term
Responsibility: Assistant to the Town Manager
Time Frame: Short term
10. Modify Action CAP-7.C: Utility Rates. Work with local utilities to adopt utility rates that
incentivize and balance energy efficiency, renewable energy, and other future clean
energy efforts that may impact demand with consideration of customer needs. Encourage
shifting customer usage to periods when the demand on the grid is lowest and/or to
periods when the energy is “cleanest,” including implementation of a time-of-use electric
rate by local electric providers. [Source: New action]
Responsibility: Assistant to the Town Manager
Time Frame: Short term
11. Modify Action CAP-7.D: Clean Energy Alliance.
Support an alliance of local agencies, large
consumers, utilities, and nonprofit organizations to
drive a regional transition to clean energy, including
innovative alternative fuels such as community solar,
wind, biofuels or biomass, geothermal, geogrid
heating and others. [Source: New action]
Responsibility: Assistant to the Town
Manager
Time Frame: Short term
12. Modify Action CAP-7.F: Town Facility Retrofits. Retrofit existing Town facilities and
encourage support other local agencies’ efforts to pursue upgrades of existing facilities as
part of future Capital Improvement Projects, considering use of all-electric energy, efficient
natural gas units, and renewable energy generation. [Source: New action]
Responsibility: Assistant to the Town Manager
Time Frame: Midterm
13. Modify Action CAP-7.I: Retrofit Incentive Promotion. Provide and Ppromote incentives
for electric HVAC system replacements (i.e., heat pumps) and other electric appliances
(e.g., water heaters, cooktops) on the Town website and at the Town planning and
permitting counters. [Source: New action]
Responsibility: Community Development Department, Assistant to the Town
Manager
Time Frame: Ongoing
In response to Deirdre Henderson,
CAP Element Comment #6
Page 117
Item 7.1
Edit list for incorporation into next Draft 2040 General Plan
(Modifications to the June 2022 Draft 2040 General Plan)
September 19, 2022
14. Add new Action CAP-7.J: “Building Energy Use Reduction Education. Invest in
education and outreach about the multiple benefits of reducing building energy usage
(e.g.-reduce energy costs, improve air quality, improve community members ’ heath, etc.)
and conversion to electric space and water heating. [Source: New action]”
Responsibility: Community Development Department, Assistant to the Town
Manager
Time Frame: Ongoing”
15. Add new Action CAP-7.K: “Building Permit Prioritization Program. Explore the creation
of a building permit prioritization program, through stakeholder engagement/a stakeholder
committee, for building decarbonization projects, that considers:
a. prioritization for most impact (i.e.-biggest bang for the buck)
b. creation of a Town staff navigator position / staff technical support
c. the financial implications to the Town Building Division, an enterprise fund, and any
fee schedule adjustments necessary to support the program, or possible General
Fund subsidies
d. educational program
e. decarbonization funding (e.g.-loans, public-private partnership, incentives)
[Source: New Action]
Responsibility: Community Development Department
Time Frame: Midterm”
16. Modify Action CAP-8.A: Reach Code. Develop and adopt a reach code by 2023 2025 that
requires new development projects above a certain threshold (e.g., square footage) to
comply with California Green Building Standards Code Tier 1 standards. Strive to meet a
target of reducing energy use by 20 percent over minimum Title 24 standards for
residential land uses and 15 percent for nonresidential land uses. Incorporate flexibility
and exemptions into the reach code to ensure that affordable housing projects and low-
income residents are not disproportionately affected by the ordinance. Require
exemptions to the solar mandate to replace lost energy generation with equal energy
savings by other measures. [Source: New action]
Responsibility: Community Development Department
Time Frame: Short term
17. Add new Policy CAP-11.3: “Local Agency Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Encourage
and support other local agencies to perform regular greenhouse gas emissions
inventories and share the data with the Town. [Source: New policy]”
18. Modify Action CAP-11.F: Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory. Update the Town’s
GHG emissions inventory every 4 years and update the CAP at a minimum of every 6 four
years to incorporate new technologies for GHG reductions, new state programs and
Page 118
Item 7.1
Edit list for incorporation into next Draft 2040 General Plan
(Modifications to the June 2022 Draft 2040 General Plan)
September 19, 2022
legislation that affect GHG emissions, and new or updated local measures to reduce GHG
emissions. If the annual reporting and monitoring actions (conducted in CAP-11.E)
indicate that the goals and policies included in CAP are not collectively achieving
appropriate progress toward the Town’s GHG reduction targets, Town staff shall prepare
and present to the Town Council recommended revisions to the CAP that would modify or
replace measures to the extent necessary to achieve the GHG reduction targets. [Source:
New action]
Responsibility: Climate Action Team
Time Frame: Ongoing
19. Add new Action CAP-11.G: “Climate Action Plan Program Cost-Benefit Analysis.
Conduct cost-benefit analysis of climate action programs and include the results in Council
staff reports for new program proposals. [Source: New action]
Responsibility: Climate Action Team
Time Frame: Ongoing”
Draft Community Character Element
1. Modify Policy CC-1.2: Surrounding Natural Context.
Ensure that any new development in Truckee’s
lowland areas, including its forested areas and
meadowlands, and in the Truckee River Valley, does
not reduce water quality or carbon sequestration,
while also contributesing to and enhances the scenic
quality and visual harmony between of the natural and
built environment that comprises the Truckee
townscape. [Source: 2025 General Plan, Community
Character Element, Policy P2.4]
2. Delete Policy CC-1.8: Open Character of Brockway Road. Preserve and enhance the
open character and qualities of the Brockway Road corridor by including appropriate
buffering and screening from the road corridor and by interspersing development areas or
nodes with green space. [Source: 2025 General Plan, Community Character Element,
Policy P14.1]
3. Modify Policy CC-1.9: Minimization of Vegetation Disturbance. Encourage the
preservation of trees and native vegetation, including specimen trees, and minimize
natural landscape disturbance in development projects, excluding actions to maintain
defensible space and remove ladder fuels. [Source: 2025 General Plan, Community
Character Element, Policy P2.10]
4. Modify Action CC-1.C: Tree Preservation Standards. Review the Development Code for
opportunities to strengthen the tree preservation ordinance to protect mature, significant
In response to Ruth Miller,
Community Character Element
Comment #19,
Council/Commission August 16,
2022 staff questions, and
additional Council comments
made after the August 23, 2022
joint session
Page 119
Item 7.1
Edit list for incorporation into next Draft 2040 General Plan
(Modifications to the June 2022 Draft 2040 General Plan)
September 19, 2022
trees, strengthen regulation on unpermitted removal of trees and grading disturbance, and
ensure tree succession planting where possible in the project development process, and
re-forestation of shrublands, while ensuring that regulations are not in direct conflict with
wildfire management goals. For projects with substantial tree removal, consider adding
off-site re-forestation requirements, should adequate sites be available. [Source: New
action]
5. Delete Policy CC-1.D: Brockway Road Corridor Standards. Amend the Development
Code to incorporate specific standards for buffering, setbacks, or vegetation along
Brockway Road to maintain the open character of the corridor. [Source: New action]
Responsibility: Community Development Department Time Frame: Midterm
6. Modify Action CC-1.F: Dock and Pier Standards. Amend the Development Code to
create standards for docks and piers to reduce visual clutter and light pollution, consult
with the Truckee Donner Recreation and Parks District to ensure recreational use for the
public, and maintain the scenic quality of Donner Lake. [Source: New action]
Responsibility: Community Development Department
Time Frame: Short term
7. Modify Action CC-2.A: Lighting Inventory and Compliance Program. Conduct an
inventory to identify the most serious instances of light pollution in Truckee. Implement a
program to work with relevant public and private property owners to retrofit, remove, or
replace polluting fixtures. Coordinate with electricity providers to provide rebates and
incentives for lighting retrofits. [Source: 2025 General Plan, Community Character
Element, Action A4.2]
Responsibility: Community Development Department
Time Frame: Long term
8. Add new Action CC-2.C: Seasonal Lighting. Explore
regulating festoon and holiday lighting for residential
and/or non-residential uses as a means to reduce light
pollution. [Source: New action]
Responsibility: Community Development
Department
Time Frame: Midterm
9. Modify Policy CC-3.2: Design Considerations. Ensure
that planning and development decisions are oriented
toward the maintenance of Truckee’s character,
reflecting the following considerations:
In response to Ruth Miller,
Community Character Element
Comment #26
In response to Rolf Godon,
Community Character Element
Comment #36
Page 120
Item 7.1
Edit list for incorporation into next Draft 2040 General Plan
(Modifications to the June 2022 Draft 2040 General Plan)
September 19, 2022
o identify specific types of centers, residential
neighborhoods, employment districts, corridors,
and gateways.
o respect the quality, character, and context of
existing development in different areas of the
town to ensure that new development enhances
the desired character of each of these areas.
o discourage new architecture that directly
mimics or is derivative of the buildings of the
historic Downtown.
o Encourage the creation of new leasable retail
spaces Downtown that are less than 5,000 sf to
support the small business and walkable
development pattern of Downtown.
o encourage the retrofit or rehabilitation of
existing buildings to more closely comply with
Town policies, standards, and guidelines for
high-quality architecture and design. [Source:
2025 General Plan, Community Character
Element, Policy P5.1]
10. Modify Policy CC-3.4: Pedestrian-Oriented Design. Encourage pedestrian-oriented
design through the following measures:
a. consideration of the relationship of the built environment to the qualities and
context of the landscape and natural environment in which it is situated.
b. building design that is proportionate to the width of the street that it fronts, is
oriented to the street, and minimizes setbacks from the public right-of-way provides
sufficient space for an anticipated increase in pedestrian use.
c. appropriate design and siting of parking facilities to minimize their visual impact
and break up their massing.
d. design of facades and building frontages with pedestrian-scale detail and a high
level of visual interest along the street frontage, including storefront display
windows, articulated massing, and fine-grain architectural detail.
e. walkable residential neighborhoods with elements such as grid or modified grid
street layouts, landscaping, sidewalks, vehicle access in the rear, and porches.
[Source: 2025 General Plan, Community Character Element, Policy 5.1, Policy
P11.1 and Policy P8.5, modified]
11. Modify Policy CC-3.7: Building Material Standards. Require new development projects to
incorporate materials, color schemes, and architectural styles that complement the
landscape and the rural and mountain environment, while also withstanding the climate
challenges of the mountains. The use of rustic and natural materials such as stone and
wood, as well as color palettes that reflect the natural environment, should be encouraged.
[Source: 2025 General Plan, Community Character Element, Policy P12.2, modified]
Page 121
Item 7.1
Edit list for incorporation into next Draft 2040 General Plan
(Modifications to the June 2022 Draft 2040 General Plan)
September 19, 2022
12. Modify Policy CC-5.1 based on Public Art Commission public comment: Public Art.
Promote high-quality, innovative, and diverse public art that enhances the community and
contributes to the town’s unique character. Support creative expression in public spaces
through a variety of artistic disciplines, including visual, music and performance. Prioritize
projects with a local context and local artists. Support art with a local context, local artists,
and functional art such as sculptural bicycle racks, trash receptacles, and outdoor seating.
[Source: New policy, Public Art Master Plan, Innovate Gateway]
13. Modify Policy CC-5.3 based on Public Art Commission public comment: Collaboration
with Community Partners. Collaboratively support the inclusion of artists, art
organizations, non-profits, members of the community and local government agencies to
develop a summit between artists, arts organizations, members of the community, the
Chamber of Commerce, the Truckee Tahoe Community Foundation, and local
governmental agencies to discuss ways to promote the arts in the Truckee area. [Source:
2025 General Plan, Community Character Element, Policy P21.4]
14. Modify Policy CC-5.4 based on Public Art Commission public comment: Public Art
Commission of Truckee. Support the Public Art Commission of Truckee by implementing
guidelines for the selection and placement of public art, the development of sustainable
funding mechanisms, and the implementation of goals and actions identified within the
Public Arts Master Plan. in working with property and business owners to identify potential
locations for public art or spaces for galleries and other arts-based businesses. [Source:
New policy, Innovate Gateway]
15. Switch the policy numbering for CC-5.4 and CC-5.3 based on Public Art Commission
public comment.
16. Modify Policy CC-5.6: Art in Private Development
Projects. Encourage the inclusion of public art,
publicly accessible display spaces, and/or cultural
facilities as part of new in private development
projects and with land use applications for major
modifications to existing non-residential and multi-
family projects. [Source: 2025 General Plan,
Community Character Element, Policy P21.5,
modified]
17. Modify Action CC-5.C: External Funding Sources.
Coordinate Collaborate with the Truckee Cultural
District, and local arts organizations, community
partners and special districts such as the Truckee Arts
Alliance, to explore new external funding sources such
as donations, grants public-private partnerships, etc.
[Source: New action, Public Art Master Plan]
In response to Ruth Miller,
Community Character Element
Comment #29
In response to Public Art
Commission, Community
Character Element Comment #15
Page 122
Item 7.1
Edit list for incorporation into next Draft 2040 General Plan
(Modifications to the June 2022 Draft 2040 General Plan)
September 19, 2022
Responsibility: Assistant to the Town Manager
Public Works Department
Time Frame: Ongoing
18. Modify Action CC-5.D: Art Education. Continue to
partner with the Tahoe Truckee Unified School
District, art educators, and art education
organizations, like Arts for the Schools, and
community partners to support and promote art
education for all ages in the classroom and beyond.
[Source: New action, Public Art Master Plan]
Responsibility: Assistant to the Town
Manager
Time Frame: Ongoing
19. Modify Action CC-5.E: Public Art Incentives. Update
the Development Code floor area ratio (FAR)
incentives for mixed-use projects and planned
development mandatory project features in the
Development Code to better incentivize public art and
cultural facilities. Incentivize artist-informed designs
of public spaces, architecture and Include
preferences for functional art, art with a local context,
and art from a local artists. Engage with key
stakeholders (e.g., building community, development
community, arts community) in establishing
appropriate incentives. [Source: 2025 General Plan,
Community Character Element, Action A21.2,
Innovate Gateway, modified]
Responsibility: Community Development
Department
Time Frame: Short term
20. Modify Action CC-5.F: Land Use Entitlement Public
Art Review. Amend the Development Code to create a
process for reviewing and approving public art as part
of a development project or as a part of an existing
development. [Source: New Action]
a.
Responsibility: Community Development
Department
Time Frame: Short term
In response to Public Art
Commission, Community
Character Element Comment #16
In response to Public Art
Commission, Community
Character Element Comment #17
In response to Public Art
Commission, Community
Character Element Comment #18
Page 123
Item 7.1
Edit list for incorporation into next Draft 2040 General Plan
(Modifications to the June 2022 Draft 2040 General Plan)
September 19, 2022
21. Modify Action CC-6.C: User-Friendly Development Code. Consider amendments to the
Development Code or develop a user friendly informational document to make the code
more understandable, simpler and accessible to the broader community. [Source: New
action]
Responsibility: Community Development Department
Time Frame: Midterm
22. Add new Action CC-6.E: “Modern Library Support.
Continue to collaborate with Nevada County and local
partners, such as Friends of the Library, to support the
development of a modern library for Truckee. [Source:
New action]”
Responsibility: Assistant to the Town
Manager, Community Development
Department
Time Frame: Ongoing”
23. Add new Action CC-6.F: “Monitor Vacancy Rates. Monitor the ratio of full-time to part-
time residents on a regular basis in relation to protection of town character, providing work-
force housing opportunities, and providing enough land to accommodate jobs year-
around. Use the monitoring findings to inform policy decisions that balance these interests.
[Source: New action]”
Responsibility: Assistant to the Town Manager, Community Development
Department
Time Frame: Ongoing”
24. Modify Policy CC-8.6: Protection of Views. Ensure that Minimize the impact of new
development or substantial and improvements on the view of significant natural features
on both sides of Donner Pass Road continue to protect views of the surrounding forest
and mountains, where feasible. [Source: New policy, IG Strategy A.4.b]
25. Modify Policy CC-3.11: Landscaping in New Developments. For all new development
in Truckee, consider how the integration of trees and native landscaping can contribute to
the overall quality of development-specific design and the town’s unique character, while
also utilizing best methods to reduce impacts on the environment. [Source: 2025 General
Plan, Community Character Element, Policy P5.8]
26. Modify Policy CC-3.12: Landscaping in Public Spaces. Examine and pursue
opportunities for planting trees and native landscaping in public spaces to help enhance
and preserve the town’s unique character, while also utilizing best methods to reduce
impacts on the environment. [Source: 2025 General Plan, Community Character Element,
Policy P5.9]
In response to April Cole,
Community Character Element
Comment #51
Page 124
Item 7.1
Edit list for incorporation into next Draft 2040 General Plan
(Modifications to the June 2022 Draft 2040 General Plan)
September 19, 2022
27. Modify Policy CC-3.13: Surface Parking Lots. Discourage Prohibit development of
surface parking lots that dominate the parcel frontage. [Source: New policy]
Draft Economic Development Element
1. Modify Action ED-1.D: New Office Space. Create an
incentive program for new development with office
spaces under 500 square feet and redevelopment of
existing larger office spaces into smaller office spaces.
[Source: New action]
Responsibility: Assistant to the Town Manager
Time Frame: Midterm
2. Delete Policy ED-2.9: Reduction in Sales Tax Leakage. Reduce sales tax leakage by
encouraging existing retailers to identify product lines for expansion that can better target
existing leakage of resident expenditures and underserved portions of tourist demand,
and by ensuring that sufficient service uses are available to support existing and future
demand by residents and visitors. Ensure that additional retail and service uses are
developed proportionally to meet any increases in demand created by development of
additional housing and lodging options. [Source: 2009 Economic Development Strategy,
modified]
3. Modify Policy ED-2.12: Broadband Infrastructure. Continue Encourage the Truckee
Donner Public Utility District and support partnerships to develop high-speed broadband
infrastructure capacity and redundancy throughout Truckee and communicate its
availability to existing and prospective businesses. [Source: 2025 General Plan, Economic
Development Element, Policy P3.2, modified]
4. Modify Action ED-2.C: Streamlined Processes. Study ways in which the Town can
streamline its processes or alter its fee structures so as to encourage small, locally owned
or desired types of businesses that provide community benefit to establish themselves in
Truckee (e.g,-reduce sales tax leakage, diversify the economy, provide more than required
workforce housing). [Source: 2025 General Plan, Economic Development Element, Action
Item A1.4]
Responsibility: Assistant to the Town Manager
Time Frame: Long term
5. Modify Action ED-2.F: Tracking Assessment of Retail Sales Leakage. Periodically
conduct a leakage analysis and assess what, if any action(s) can be taken to address and
overcome the cause of retail sales leakage that is desirable to capture within Truckee.
Track changes in retail sales within categories and monitor increases in sales in categories
identified as having leakage. Periodically conduct a leakage analysis update to confirm
progress. [Source: 2009 Economic Development Strategy, modified]
In response to Mountain Area
Preservation, Economic
Development Element Comment
#10
Page 125
Item 7.1
Edit list for incorporation into next Draft 2040 General Plan
(Modifications to the June 2022 Draft 2040 General Plan)
September 19, 2022
Responsibility: Assistant to the Town Manager
Time Frame: Ongoing
6. Add new Policy ED-3.7: “Work with community
partners, including Tahoe Truckee Community
Foundation, to explore the creation of privately-funded
workforce housing programs, such as a housing land
trust or community lending program. [Source: New
policy]”
7. Add new Policy ED-4.11: “Coordinate with other special districts, community partners and
large employers to achieve the policies and goals outlines in the Economic Development
Element. [Source: New policy]”
8. Modify Policy ED-4.5: Arts and Recreation Programs. Continue to work with the Truckee
Donner Recreation and Park District to support and expand its arts and recreation
programs. [Source: 2025 General Plan, Economic Development Element, Policy 6.3]
9. Modify Action ED-4.D: Incentivization of New Childcare Facilities. Develop an incentive
program and support expanded community partnerships to facilitate the opening and on-
going success of for new childcare facilities to meet community needs. [Source: New
action]
Responsibility: Community Development Department
Time Frame: Midterm
10. Add new Action ED-4.E: “Community Facility
Collaboration. Continue to collaborate with local
partners to support the development of community
facilities, such as a modern library, that provide equitable
access to digital resources and essential information to
support job search, education, and cultural opportunities.
[Source: New action]
Responsibility: Assistant to the Town Manager
Time Frame: Ongoing”
11. Add new Action ED-4.F: “Collect Truckee-Specific Data. Acquire Truckee-specific data
quantifying the number of employees we have at different wage and salary levels, along
with Truckee-specific data on the number of residents we have at different income levels
along with Truckee-specific data on the number of residents we have at different income
levels. Use the data to inform housing policy development and modifications. [Source:
New action]
In response to April Cole,
Economic Development Element
Comment #20
In response to Ruth Miller,
Economic Development Element
Comment #4
Page 126
Item 7.1
Edit list for incorporation into next Draft 2040 General Plan
(Modifications to the June 2022 Draft 2040 General Plan)
September 19, 2022
Responsibility: Assistant to the Town Manager
Time Frame: Midterm”
12. Add new Action ED-4.G: “Monitor Local Workforce Housing Needs. Collect local
workforce housing data, including from employers and employees, and evaluate the
effectiveness of inclusionary and workforce housing policies and standards to better
understand the nature and extent of housing needs. Use this data to modify adopted
housing policy and in making housing strategy decisions. [Source: New action]
Responsibility: Community Development Department
Time Frame: Ongoing”
13. Modify Policy ED-5.1: Eclectic Character of Downtown Truckee. Preserve the eclectic
nature and “Truckee Funk” of the historic Downtown core as a unique shopping destination
for locals and visitors. [Source: New policy]
14. Modify Policy ED-6.3: Feasibility of Additional River Recreational Amenities Truckee
River Whitewater Park. As part of river enhancement, explore the potential feasibility of
additional Truckee River recreational amenities (e.g.-a Truckee River whitewater park,
formalized kayak/raft launching facilities, fishing spots, other opportunities that would bring
people to the river while also supporting local businesses). [Source: 2009 Economic
Development Strategy, modified]
15. Add new Action ED-6.A: “Truckee River Corridor Program. Create a Truckee River
corridor enhancement program that implements the goals of the Downtown River
Revitalization Strategy. [Source: New action]
Responsibility: Assistant to the Town Manager
Time Frame: Midterm”
Page 127
Item 7.1
Land Use Element Action Time Frame
LU-1.A Development Code Update for New Land Use Designations Short Term
LU-1.D Transfer of Development Rights Short Term
LU-1.F Replace Highway Commercial Zoning Short Term
LU-2.B Town of Truckee Density Bonus Short Term
LU-2.D Clustered Residential Standards Update Short Term
LU-2.E Maximum Home Sizes Short Term
LU-2.F Incentives for Accessory Dwelling Units Short Term
LU-2.G Variety of Housing Types Short Term
LU-2.H Infill Housing in Single-Family Neighborhoods Short Term
LU.3.A Residential Development Incentives Short Term
LU-3.B Building Size Short Term
LU-4.A Additional Industrial Land Short Term
LU-4.B Industrial Development Standards Amendment Short Term
LU-5.B Urban Water Management Plan Short Term
LU-5.D Funding Mechanisms for Police Services Short Term
LU-6.A Update Plan to Include Objective Design Standards Short Term
LU-6.C Ground Floor Uses Short Term
LU-7.A Joerger Ranch Specific Plan Update Short Term
LU-7.B Joerger Ranch Specific Plan Design Standards Short Term
LU-8.A Gateway District Overlay Short Term
LU-8.C Tahoe Forest Hospital Master Plan Short Term
LE-8.E Simple Tenant Improvement Permit Process Short Term
LU-9.A West River Study Short Term
LU-9.B Objective Design Standards Short Term
LU-10.A Water Quality Impacts Short Term
LU-10.B Garbage and Recycling Service at Donner Lake Short Term
LU-12.B Transfer of Development Rights Program in Planning Area Short Term
LU-1.E East River Street Zoning Midterm
LU-2.I Mobile Home Park Zoning Midterm
LU-8.B Public Facility Relocation Midterm
LU-10.C Donner Lake Parking District Midterm
LU-12.A Annexation Policies Midterm
LU-12.C Open Space Protection Strategy Midterm
LU-12.D Prosser Creek Annexation Midterm
LU-6.B No Housing Loss in Downtown Long Term
LU-1.B Anbnual Development Report Annually
LU-5.C Capital Improvements Program Annually
LU-8.D Housing on Excess Public Property Annually
LU-1.C GIS Database Ongoing
LU-2.A Workforce Housing Strategy Ongoing
LU-2.C Short-Term Rental Regulations Ongoing
LU-5.A Sewer Master Plan Ongoing
Community Character
Element Action Time Frame
CC-1.A Development Code Regulations for Scenic Resources Short Term
CC-1.F Dock and Pier Standards Short Term
CC-1.G Telecommunication Tower Standards Short Term
CC-3.A Residential Objective Design Standards Short Term
CC-3.B Nonresidential Design Standards Short Term
CC-3.C Legal Nonconforming Structures Short Term
CC-4.B Historic Design Standards Short Term
CC-4.F Restoration Incentives Short Term
CC-5.E Public Art Incentives Short Term
CC-5.F Land Use Entitlement Public Art Review Short Term
CC-6.A Public Outreach Short Term
CC-8.A Innovate Gateway Strategy Short Term
Draft 2040 General Plan Actions Time Frame Matrix, September 19, 2022
Page 128
Item 7.1
CC-8.B Gateway Feature Short Term
CC-1.B Scenic Corridor Standards Midterm
CC-1.C Tree Preservation Standards Midterm
CC-1.D Brockway Road Corridor Standards Midterm
CC-1.E Donner Lake District Midterm
CC-2.C Seasonal Lighting Midterm
CC-3.G Property Maintenance Standards Midterm
CC-4.A Historic Architectural Resources Inventory Midterm
CC-4.E Historic Preservation Education Midterm
CC-4.G Mills Act Midterm
CC-4.H Historic Resource Property Maintenance Midterm
CC-4.I Historic Site Tour Midterm
CC-5.A Truckee Public Art Master Plan Midterm
CC-6.C User-Friendly Development Code Midterm
CC-6.D Local Services List Midterm
CC-7.A Hilltop Master Plan Midterm
CC-2.A Lighting Inventory and Compliance Program Long Term
CC-2.B Nonresidential Interior Lighting Long Term
CC-3.D Flexible Gathering Spaces Long Term
CC-3.E Sign Inventory Long Term
CC-3-F Billboard Amortization Long Term
CC-3.H Undergrounding of Utilities Ongoing
CC-3.I Railyard Master Plan and Coldstream Specific Plan Ongoing
CC-4.C Historic Preservation Program Ongoing
CC-4.D Education on the Importance of the Truckee River Ongoing
CC-5.B Dedicated Funding Ongoing
CC-5.C External Funding Sources Ongoing
CC-5.D Art Education Ongoing
CC-6.B Year-Round Events Ongoing
CC-6.E Modern Library Support Ongoing
CC-6.F Monitor Vacancy Rates Ongoing
Mobility Element Action Time Frame
M-1.B VMT Mitigation Short Term
M-1.C Rideshare Programs Short Term
M-1.D Mobile Rideshare Applications Short Term
M-1.G Town-wide VMT Monitoring and Adaptive Management Program Short Term
M-2.A Trails and Bikeways Master Plan Update Short Term
M-2.H Green Business Certification Process Short Term
M-2.I New Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities Short Term
M-3.A Short Range Transit Plan Short Term
M-3.B Long Range Transit Plan Short Term
M-3.E Placer County and Tahoe Truckee Unified School District Partnership Short Term
M-3.F Community Outreach and Marketing Campaign Short Term
M-3.M Transportation Working Group Short Term
M-3.P Low-No Emission Transit Fleet Transition Plan Short term
M-3.Q Transit Evacuation Guide Short term
M-4.A Circulation Impact Analysis Criteria Short Term
M-4.D Future Right-of-Way Requirements Short Term
M-4.F Public Improvements and Engineering Standards Short Term
M-4.G Study of Roundabout Replacement Suitability Short Term
M-6.C Funding for Transit Capital and Operations Short Term
M-8.A Regional Transportation Plan Short Term
M-1.A Transportation Demand Management Program Midterm
M-2.L Bike and Pedestrian Wayfinding Midterm
M-2.M Bicycle Parking Midterm
M-2.N Bicycle Parking Capital Improvement Project Midterm
M-2.O Shower and Locker Room Incentives Midterm
M-3.I Bus Shelter Requirements Midterm
M-3.J Real-Time Travel Technologies Midterm
M-3.K First-Last Mile Gap Analysis Midterm
Page 129
Item 7.1
M-3.O Pursue Broadband and Fiber Optic Conduit Options Midterm
M-4.E Traffic Model Update Midterm
M-5.A Streetscape Improvement Plans Midterm
M-5.B Evaluation of Parking Requirements Midterm
M-5.C Street Light Replacement Program Midterm
M-6.A Traffic and VMT Impact Fee Updates Midterm
M-7.A Railroad Crossing Improvements Midterm
M-8.C Roadway Improvements on SR 267 Midterm
M-2.B Funding for Trails and Bikeways Master Plan Implemation Annually
M-4.B Circulation Improvement Time Frames Annually
M-4.C Capital Improvement Program Updates Annually
M-6.B Funding for Transportation Improvements Annually
M-8.B Coordination of Transit Programs Annually
M-1.E Transportation Network Company Greenhouse Gas Reductions Ongoing
M-1.F Electric Vehicle and Bike Charging Stations Ongoing
M-2.C Funding to Maintain Key Trails and Bikeways Ongoing
M-2.D Funding Sources for Streetscape Improvements Ongoing
M-2.E Bicycle and Pedestrian Roadway Improvements Ongoing
M-2.F Assessment District Financing Ongoing
M-2.G Regional Trail Connections Ongoing
M-2.J Downtown Bike and Pedestrian Connections Ongoing
M-2.K Bicycle and Trail Promotion Ongoing
M-2.P Bike Trail Use Ongoing
M-3.C Develop New Funding Mechanisms for Transit Capital and Operations Ongoing
M-3.D Grant Funding for Transit Services Ongoing
M-3.G Town-Sponsored Transit Services Ongoing
M-3.H Continuation and Expansion of Transit Services Ongoing
M-3.L Ongoing Participation in Truckee North Tahoe Management Association Ongoing
M-8.D Transit Prioritization along SR 89 and SR 267 Ongoing
Economic Development
Element Action Time Frame
ED-1.B Economic Development Strategic Plan Short Term
ED-2.A Adaptive Reuse Short Term
ED-2.D Business License Program Short Term
ED-2.E Inventory of Light Industrial Space Short Term
ED-3.C Support Workforce Housing with Transient Occupancy Tax Revenue Short Term
ED-5.B Suitable Industrial Sites to Relocate Downtown Industrial Uses Short Term
ED-1.C High-Wage Employment Midterm
ED-1.D New Office Space Midterm
ED-1.I Support for Local Partners Midterm
ED-2.B Local Business Needs and Tools Midterm
ED-2.G Targeted Recruitment of New Retailers Midterm
ED-2.I Relief Structure to Encourage Resiliency Midterm
ED-3.B Management of Tourist Attractions to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions Midterm
ED-4.C Policy Framework for Mitigation of Low-Wage Jobs Midterm
ED-4.D Incentivization of New Childcare Facilities Midterm
ED-2.C Streamlined Processes Long Term
ED-5.C Relocation of Public Agencies and Utilities Long Term
ED-4.F Collect Truckee-Specific Data Midterm
ED-6.A Truckee River Corridor Program Midterm
ED-1.A Staffing Resources for Economic Development Ongoing
ED-1.E Healthcare Opportunities Ongoing
ED-1.F Funding for Small Business Loans Ongoing
ED-1.G Financial Assistance for Economic Development Programs Ongoing
ED-1.H Local Small Business Programs Ongoing
ED-2.F Assessment Tracking of Retail Sales Leakage Ongoing
ED-2.H Expand Broadband Infastructure Ongoing
ED-3.A Sustainable Management of Tourism Ongoing
Page 130
Item 7.1
ED-4.A Coordination Between Local Education and Business Groups Ongoing
ED-4.B Unemployment Rate Trends Ongoing
ED-4.E Community Facility Collaboration Ongoing
ED-4.G Monitor Local Workforce Housing Needs Ongoing
ED-5.A Raised Profile of Downtown Business Ongoing
Conservation and Open
Space Element Action Time Frame
COS-1.A Partnerships with Open Space Conservation Groups Short Term
COS-1.C Mapping of Open Space and Natural Resources Short Term
COS-7.C Performance Guarantees Short Term
COS-9.A Quimby Act Standards Short Term
COS-2.A Management Plans for Truckee River and Donner Lake Midterm
COS-2.B Incentivization of Public Access and Restoration Activities Midterm
COS-2.C Funding for Restoration Activities Midterm
COS-3.A Management and Protection of Sensitive Biological Resources Midterm
COS-3.C Education Strategy for Property Owners Midterm
COS-3.E Gregory Creek Floodplain Midterm
COS-8.A Particulate Matter Air Quality Management Plan Update and Review Midterm
COS-8.B Anti-Idling Program Midterm
COS-9.B Support for the Truckee Donner Recreation and Park District Master Plan Midterm
COS-10.A Periodic Review of Source Reduction and Recycling Ordinance Midterm
COS-10.B Pursue Single-Use Plastic Reduction Midterm
COS-7.B National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Permit and Stormwater Quality Ordinance Annually
COS-1.B Protection of Open Space in the Planning Area Ongoing
COS-1.D Transfer of Development Rights Ongoing
COS-3.B Monitoring of Sensitive Resources Ongoing
COS-3.D Incentives for Protection of Significant Wildlife Habitat and Sensitive Biological Resources Ongoing
COS-4.A Amendment of Mineral Resource Maps as Needed Ongoing
COS-5.A Identification of Existing Critical Erosion Problems and Pursue Funding Ongoing
COS-5.B Use of Innovative Erosion Control Measures Ongoing
COS-7.A Monitoring of Water Quality in Truckee River Basin Ongoing
COS-9.C Review and Comment on Management and Releases from Local Reservoirs Ongoing
Safety and Noise Element Action Time Frame
SN-2.A Fire Safe Regulations Short Term
SN-2.E Fire-Adapted Landscaping and Revegetation Standards Short Term
SN-6.A Emergency Operations Plan Short Term
SN-6.B Local Hazard Mitigation Plan Short Term
SN-6.C Community Wildfire Protection Plan Short Term
SN-6.D Emergency Planning Short Term
SN-6.G Post-Disaster Rebuilding Ordinance Short Term
SN-8.F Funding and Assistance to Address Existing Interior Noise Short Term
SN-8.G Communication with Union Pacific Railroad Short Term
SN-8.A Amendment of Development Code Requirements for Vibration-Sensitive Uses Midterm
SN-8.B Amendment of Development Code Sound Wall Requirements Midterm
SN-8.C Amendment of Development Code Requirements for New Noise Sources Midterm
SN-5.A Standards for Steep Slopes Midterm
SN-5.B Building Retrofits for Earthquake and Landslide Protection Midterm
SN-8.D Amendment of Development Code Amplified Sound Requirements Midterm
SN-8.E Amendment of Development Code for Airport Land Use Compatibility Midterm
SN-4.A Snow Avalanche Overlay District Standards Long Term
SN-1.A Climate Change Education Ongoing
SN-2.B Reduction of Fuels on Public Land Ongoing
SN-2.C Reduction of Ignition Sources Ongoing
SN-2.D Funding to Support Wildfire Risk Reduction Ongoing
SN-2.F Forest Thinning Events Ongoing
SN-2.G Fire Insurance Ongoing
SN-2.H Fire Prevention Education Programs Ongoing
Page 131
Item 7.1
SN-6.E Emergency Preparedness Website Ongoing
SN-6.F Public Education on Emergency Prepraredness and Response Ongoing
SN-6.8 Emergency Displacement Contingency Plans Ongoing
Climate Action Plan
Element Action Time Frame
CAP-7.A Building Energy Retrofit Program Short Term
CAP-7.B Renewable Natural Gas Supply Short Term
CAP-7.C Utility Rates Short Term
CAP-7.D Clean Energy Alliance Short Term
CAP-7.E Rural Regional Energy Network Short Term
CAP-7.G Water Conservation Education Short Term
CAP-7.H Roadmap to Decarbonization Short Term
CAP-8.A Reach Code Short Term
CAP-8.B All-Electric Development Incentives Short Term
CAP-8.E Outdoor Water Use Reductions Short Term
CAP-9.A Recycling and Composting Ordinance Short Term
CAP-9.B Edible Food Recovery Short Term
CAP-9.C Development Standards for Organic Waste Collection Short Term
CAP-10.A Reduce Single-Use Items Short Term
CAP-10.C Ordinance to Discourage Single-Use Items Short Term
CAP-11.B Sustainability Coordinator Short Term
CAP-11.C Climate Action Team Short Term
CAP-11.D CAP Development Review Checklist Short Term
CAP-7.F Town Facility Retrofits Midterm
CAP-7.K Building Permit Prioritization Program Midterm
CAP-8.C Zero Net Energy Standard Midterm
CAP-10.B Reuse Facility and Repair Hubs Midterm
CAP-10.D Consumption-Based Emmissions Study Midterm
CAP-7.I Retrofit Incentive Promotion Ongoing
CAP-7.J Building Energy Use Reduction Education Ongoing
CAP-8.D Energy Efficiency Upgrade Trainings Ongoing
CAP-9.D Sustainaability and Climate Change Education Ongoing
CAP-11.A Sierra Regional Climate Action Planning Program Ongoing
CAP-11.E CAP Implementation and Progress Reports Ongoing
CAP-11.F Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Ongoing
CAP 11.G Climate Action Plan Program Cost-Benefit Analysis Ongoing
New Action
Page 132
Item 7.1
TRUCKEE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
CLIMATE ACTION PLAN ELEMENT
On June 8, 2022, the Town of Truckee released the Truckee 2040 General Plan Update, including the new Climate
Action Plan (CAP) Element. During the public review process, the Truckee Town Council and Planning Commission
held study sessions to review the General Plan Update and receive community input. On July 19, 2022, a study session
was held to present the CAP Element to the Town Council and Planning Commission for review and feedback. Several
key concerns emerged related to progress toward meeting reduction targets, specifically the Town’s adopted 2040
GHG reduction target.
Greenhouse Gas Reduction Targets
In November 2017, the Town adopted Resolution 2017-58, which established a target to reduce community-wide
greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to 80 percent below 2008 levels by 2040. The CAP Element establishes goals,
policies, and actions to help the Town reduce GHG emissions. The CAP compares GHG emission forecasts to the
Town’s adopted 2040 target as well as a 2030 target, which is based on the trajectory necessary to meet the Town’s
2040 target (and also aligned with the State’s target, discussed further below). The Town’s targets included in the
CAP Element are as follows.
40 percent below 2008 levels by 2030
80 percent below 2008 levels by 2040
100 percent below 2008 levels by 2045
The Town’s targets are more ambitious than those that would be set using locally adjusted State targets established
under Senate Bill (SB) 32, which requires statewide emissions be reduced to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 ;
Executive Order S-3-05, which sets a goal to reduce statewide emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050 ;
and Executive Order S-55-18, which sets a goal for the state to achieve carbon neutrality by 2045. More recently, in
August 2022, Assembly Bill 1279 was passed codifying the State’s goal to achieve carbon neutrality in 2045 and
establishing a target to reduce statewide anthropogenic emissions to 85 percent below 1990 levels by 2045.
Importantly, this legislation was adopted after the Notice of Preparation of the Truckee 2040 General Plan Update
was released.
As shown in Table CAP-1 of the CAP Element, implementation would result in GHG reductions that meet the 2030
target but would fall short of achieving the 2040 target set by Resolution 2017-58.
Considerations in Meeting the 2040 GHG Reduction Target
Although it is important for the Town to consider and plan for long-term GHG reduction targets, the CAP Element
shortfall in achieving the 2040 target is not considered cause for concern at this time as there is a substantiated
reduction pathway to achieve the 2030 target and, per Action CAP-11.E and Action CAP-11.F, the Town will monitor
CAP implementation and continue to update the CAP to incorporate necessary revisions to the measures as well as
new information and technologies . As stated in the CAP Element, “This CAP Element is primarily focused on achieving
the 2030 target and aims to make substantial progress in achieving the longer -term targets. Achievement of the
longer-term targets will require monitoring, tracking, and adjusting locally enacted GHG reduction measures, along
with advances in new technolog ies and markets, as well as updates to CARB’s Scoping Plan and future state and
federal actions.” Revisions to the CAP Element necessary to meet the 2040 target would go beyond the measures and
guidance provided by the State as the 2022 Scoping Plan is still in draft form (has not yet been adopted). Such
actions could also push new development to address more than their fair share to reduce GHG emissions.
Page 133
Item 7.1
Ascent Truckee Climate Action Plan Element
2
CARB Scoping Plan and Statewide Guidance
The California Air Resources Board (CARB) 2017 Scoping Plan identifies how the State can reach the target established
by SB 32 to reduce statewide emissions to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 . Much of the actions and
quantifications included in the Town’s public draft CAP Element are based on the 2017 Scoping P lan, and although
the 2017 Scoping Plan does present long-term actions such as the steps needed to achieve Zero Net Carbon
Buildings, it does not present a strategy to meet GHG reduction targets beyond the 2030 goal. CARB is currently
preparing the 2022 Scoping Plan, which will identify a path to achieving carbon neutrality no later than 2045.
However, this plan is still in process, so the exact details of how the State will meet long-term reduction targets are
unknown at this time. CARB circulated the Draft Environmental Analysis (Draft EA) for public review and comment for
a period of 45 days that began on May 10, 2022 and ended on June 24, 2022. After the end of the Draft EA public
review period, CARB identified revisions to certain aspects of the propo sal that merit revisions to the project
description; consequently, a recirculated Draft EA, which includes direction from the Board as discussed at the June
23-24, 2022 Board Hearing and direction provided by Governor Newsom in a letter dated July 22, 2022 , was released
on September 9, 2022 for another review period.
That said, it has been acknowledged that to a chieve the State’s carbon neutrality targets, robust actions involving
carbon sequestration and storage will be required. At this time, methods and technology to achieve significant
reductions through carbon sequestration and storage at the local level largely have not been thoroughly tested or
quantified. Finalization and adoption of the 2022 Scoping Plan, alongside technology advancements, will guide the
Town and other local jurisdictions on how to apply carbon sequestration and other GHG reduction measures to meet
2040 and 2045 targets. Per Action CAP-11.E and Action CAP-11.F, the Town will track and monitor CAP
implementation and update the CAP regularly based on implementation progress and the development of new
information, quantification methods, and technologies.
CEQA Implications
The Town’s CAP Element is intended to be a “qualified CAP” structured to serve as a programmatic tiering document
for use under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). CEQA requires that a determination of significant
impacts on the environment be based on substantial evidence. Substantial evidence is defined to include facts,
reasonable assumptions predicated upon facts, and expert opinion supported by facts. Substantial evidence does not
include argument, speculation, unsubstantiated op inion or narrative, evidence which is clearly inaccurate or
erroneous, or evidence of social or economic impacts which do not contribute to, or are not caused by, physical
impacts on the environment. Quantifying GHG reduction measures beyond those identified to meet 2030 targets is
difficult using the data and technology available today. As such, quantifying measures to meet 2040 targets would
require some level of speculation and would likely lack the substantial evidence necessary under CEQA. Although a
handful of jurisdictions in California have adopted CAPs that include 2040 targets, these CAPs do not provide a
streamlining mechanism for that far into the future. It is recommended that the Town only include measures and
quantifications based on substantial evidence to qualify for CEQA streamlining practices (i.e., tiering).
Conclusion
As such, it is recommended that the Town move forward with the CAP Element as currently written and implement
the actions outlined to meet the 2030 reduction target. At the time of the next CAP update (per Action CAP 11-.F), the
Town should incorporate revisions to the measures based on the results of monitoring (per Action CAP -11.E) and new
information and technologies, as well as guidance provided in the 2022 Scoping Plan , once adopted, to achieve the
2040 reduction target.
Page 134
Item 7.1
September 19, 2022
2040 General Plan Update
Additional Council/Commission Questions, Staff Responses
Draft Land Use Element
1. Guiding Principles. The Council's decision to increase density via the LUA process and
emphasize large, multi - story, multi - family housing across town with no provisions
beyond 15% inc inclusionary housing will impact the community in many ways. Our special
characteristics and resources will be impacted and possibly damaged by the development
of such large and obtrusive buildings, similar in size and scale to the Artists' Lofts but
spread out in areas with more scenic resources like Gateway and Hwy 89 north. With an
emphasis on 85%ma rket rate housing which historically has gone to non full-time
residents (+ 50%) There will be more visitor traffic and more pressure on the locals to be
able to afford the units they have.
Staff Response: The Council supported a shift to mixed-use land use designations at
Donner Lake (mixed-use low), throughout Gateway (mixed-use medium and mixed-use
12-32 dwelling units per acre), along the south side of West River Street (6-18 dwelling
units per acre) and encompassing the Glenshire commercial node (mixed-use low). There
is opportunity to increase inclusionary housing through Action LU-2.B, the Town Density
Bonus program.
2. Big Ideas. Modern Industrial Economy. I have been part of the industrial economy for a
good portion of my life. While there are some instances of people making a decent wage,
the typical wages of industrial workers is not in line with Truckee's market rate housing. I
don't think it is appropriate to assume that the emphasis of industrial and other commercial
job creating uses will be in line with unregulated market forces. We have seen and are
currently seeing how the Bay Area has driven up the cost of housing to levels never seen
before. There is no reason to believe this will not happen with the increased density of
market rate, multifamily housing. Without deed restrictions and rent control, we will make
a bad situation worse.
Staff Response: The Draft 2040 General Plan supports the creation of a Modern Industrial
Economy, building off the 2025 General Plan's economic development policies to continue
to work on economic diversification (i.e.-support the continuation of industrial uses). State
housing law precludes the ability to limit housing to only deed-restricted housing units. A
Town-specific Density Bonus program would create an opportunity to incentivize housing
types and affordability levels that meet local workforce needs.
3. During the GP update process, multiple requests were made to focus on the existing Plan
Areas before we upzone or rezone other areas peripheral to the town core. Unfortunately
this did not happen. We should reconsider this decision and emphasize the importance of
dedicating time and energy into these already defined plan areas. There is great concern
that without a clear intent or motivation to address the issues created at PC -1, PC -2, PC
-3, Railyard & Hilltop, we will see blight and unfinished projects fester. The Downtown Plan
should be the starting point, not an afterthought or come
secondary to other developable areas.
Page 135
Item 7.1
September 19, 2022
Staff Response: This comment speaks to interest in seeing Specific Plan/Master Plan
buildout first before modifying density elsewhere. The Council could consider new
incentives to support development within these areas or revisit prior direction to
incorporate new mixed-use land use designations.
4. Corridor Mixed-Use. This designation appears to represent only land connected to the
Hospital Master Plan Area, aside from a small parcel west of Gateway East / Zander's and
Safeway. This is concerning, especially as it is the highest allowable density in town at up
to 32 units / acre and a 12.5 FAR. Thre of the Planning Commissioners voted to not
provide expansion of Tahoe Forest Hospital/Implementation of the Hospital Master Plan.
All 5 PC members voted they were concerned about the Hospital Campus Designation
and 1.25 FAR was too high. Concerned that the Master Plan is an unknown and future
development needs to be in scale with existing development. It is unfortunate that this was
not supported by the Town Council.
Staff Response: The Council's direction from the November 15, 2021 Land Use
Alternatives discussion was to maintain the 2025 land use designations for Hospital-
owned land on the south side of Donner Pass Road and also to modify the land use
designation on the north side of Donner Pass Road between Frates Lane and the McIver
roundabout from Commercial to mixed-use, 12-32 dwelling units per acre, which
encompasses several hospital-owned parcels. Tahoe Forest Hospital has submitted their
campus master plan to the Town which includes an application to amend land use
designations and zoning. The planning staff is currently reviewing the application submittal
and a formal public process will follow.
5. Industrial and Business. I am concerned that the allowance of housing in industrial could
dilute this much needed use. I feel housing should be secondary to industrial and not be
allowed without industrial as a component. This is not clear per the language. We can't
claim to be desperate for industrial zoning and provide ways for developers to avoid this
designation.
Staff Response: There is additional opportunity to define ratios of industrial square footage
to residential, or other development standards to emphasize primarily industrial use in the
Development Code. Objective design standards can be created for (1) ratio of industrial
to residential, (2) no ground floor residential, etc.
6. Sphere of Influence. All properties identified to be annexed by the town in the SOI should
be for open space creation and preservation. As a consistent goal throughout the 2025GP,
the community does not support sprawl. We should codify this with a policy related to the
SOI for land preservation.
Staff Response: The Town's sphere was discussed by the Council and Commission at
their July 12, 2022 joint meeting. Direction was provided to add a policy to extend the
sphere to better protect open space recreation and conservation.
7. Goal LU-1. While I support and believe in this goal, I don't believe the Town Council
supported LUAs are in line with it. Increasing densities across the board for market rate
housing, commercial and industrial uses without protections in place to make the housing
affordable and accessible to locals and ensure that the job creating uses are not making
Page 136
Item 7.1
September 19, 2022
an existing housing problem worse, does not support the environment, reduce sprawl or
mitigate public safety threats.
Staff Response: Comment noted.
8. Policy LU 1.1. We currently have traffic impacts that are exacerbated by regional visitors,
tourists, and Truckee's non - full time homeowners. Increasing densities for market rate
housing will make a bad situation worse. We should remove " reduce traffic impacts in the
region."
Staff Response: Staff supports modifying LU-1.1. to remove "reduce traffic impacts in the
region." This change is included in the September 27, 2022 joint Council/Commission staff
report.
9. Policy LU 1.2. Over densifying the population coupled with rampant growth in the region
increases our risks for evacuation during a wildfire. More cars on the road and limited
evacuation routes creates a harmful scenario.
Staff Response: Comment noted.
10. Policy LU 1.4. Town's support for development on 1-80 at Upper McIver is at odds with
this policy. While the development isn't' accessed by the freeway, it is adjacent to and
heavily impacted by the freeway. Why are we emphasizing limitations to freeway -oriented
development yet continue to propose projects on the freeway?
Staff Response: The Upper McIver site was discussed with the land use alternatives
process and Council direction was to move forward with the existing High Density
Residential Land Use Designation. Staff is also prosing a new Action LU-1.E to consider
changing Highway Commercial zoning to more neighborhood serving uses.
11. Policy LU 1.5. This policy makes no sense unless we go back and remove all of the
increased density provided by the Town Council in the LUA process. The TC approved
increasing land use intensities with no benefit, public or otherwise all across town. There
should be no increased densities without clear and tangible public benefits such as deed
restricted, locals' housing affordable to wages earned in the community. Not a windfall for
landowners & developers who got increased densities and do the bare minimum to
support workforce housing. There was a collective and continued request by the PC to
make a locals' housing overlay for all areas of increased housing density so it would be
serving a public good.
Staff Response: Comment noted.
12. Policy LU-2.1. Unfortunately this policy is not accurate in that regional traffic impacts will
likely be increased, not decreased by the preferred LUA.
Staff Response: Comment noted. Staff recommends maintaining the policy language as
proposed.
Page 137
Item 7.1
September 19, 2022
13. Policy LU-2.2. This is good. We need clear and tangible ways for people to build ADUs
and other local serving housing with incentives like permit fee waivers, etc.
Staff Response: Comment noted.
14. Policy LU 2.5. Unfortunately this policy is not appropriate in that the increased job creating
uses, coupled with increased market rate housing, will further an already deficient housing
environment.
Staff Response: Comment noted. Staff recommends maintaining the policy language as
proposed.
15. Action LU-2.B. Unfortunately, the densities were increased all around town with no
benefits beyond the existing 15% inclusionary policy. All density benefits should be tied to
community benefits beyond our existing policies.
Staff Response: Comment noted.
16. Goal LU-3. While I support and believe in this goal, I don't believe the Town Council
supported LUAs are in line with it. Increasing densities across the board for market rate
housing, commercial and industrial uses without protections in place to make the housing
affordable and accessible to locals will increase GHG emissions, traffic and land use
conflicts.
Staff Response: Comment noted.
17. Goal LU-4. Unfortunately the average job created by industrial uses or maker uses does
not come with a high wage. This will put the already limited and heavily competed for
housing units in more demand.
Staff Response: Land Use Goal 4 speaks to maintaining industrial and maker uses as a
way to support a diverse economy. A possible future role of the Economic Program
Manager could be to survey existing businesses to better understand wages for these
sectors.
18. Policy LU-4.1. I do not support the rezoning of any land to industrial until we assess its
appropriateness for this use. Additionally, we should not rezone land with the intent of
relocation of existing uses without a clear plan for how it will be done. Incentives must be
identified to assist businesses with the impact of moving. There appears to be enough
land for industrial but we are restricted by existing, non - conforming uses and land owners
who are unwilling to do anything with the land. Perhaps the town should offer to buy the
land and redevelop it at West River Street? I am supportive of exploring land on Joerger
Road near the Sanitary District and Bus Barn for industrial uses.
Staff Response: Land Use Action 4.A calls for identification of land that is suitable for
redevelopment or zoning for new industrial development. Staff proposes to modify this
action to increase the total from five acres to 10-15 acres and also to work with Truckee
Page 138
Item 7.1
September 19, 2022
Sanitary District, Tahoe Truckee Sanitation Agency and the Truckee Tahoe Airport District
on the feasibility of creating industrial land along Joerger Drive.
19. Policy LU-4.2. I don't support this. If we keep emphasizing how dire it is to have industrial
land at our disposal, why would we allow someone to change the designation? Similarly,
we should not let the industrial uses be turned in to housing only.
Staff Response: Land Use Policy 4.2 provides a tool to require replacement as part of a
General Plan amendment process. Stronger wording requiring "equal" versus "adequate"
replacement would ensure no net loss. Staff recommends changing “adequate” to “equal.”
This change is included in the September 27, 2022 joint Council/Commission staff report.
20. Action LU-5.A. I encourage the town to work closely with the Sanitation Agency to ensure
the citizens are not being harmed by their actions. The ongoing air pollution released by
the SA seems toxic and unhealthy. We deserve better. More oversight is encouraged
regarding their operations.
Staff Response: Comment noted.
21. Goal LU-7. While I support this goal and the goal in the specific plan requiring 50%of jobs
created to provide housing, no housing has been built to date. We should either remove
this goal, amend it to remove the housing provision, or commit in the next year to building
housing for the workers created at Joerger/ Soaring Ranch.
Staff Response: A building permit for Soaring Ranch Phase 2, which includes 69 housing
units (8 of which are affordable), is currently under review by the Building Division. The
Planning Division is currently processing land use permits for Soaring Ranch Phase 3,
which includes 109 housing units (18 of which are proposed as affordable).
22. Policy LU-7.4. This needs to be addressed ASAP. This should be a number one priority
for council.
Staff Response: Comment noted.
23. Policy LU-8.8. There should be no blanket support for the Hospital Master Plan without a
clear understanding of the intent, impacts and benefits to the town. They are not mutually
exclusive.
Staff Response: Comment Noted.
24. Policy LU-8.9. I DO NOT SUPPORT ANY DEVELOPMENT ON UPPER MC IVER! This is
an environmental justice issue and a poorly thought out decision with huge impacts.
Traffic, air, noise pollution. Access, scenic corridor, wildfire hazard, topography issues,
etc. This should be returned to its original designation as open space. There are other
properties appropriate for development of this intent. Look at Hope Court.
Staff Response: Comment noted.
Page 139
Item 7.1
September 19, 2022
25. Action LU-9.A. RE: West River Study. Encourage the town to work with MAP as well to do
public outreach and engagement as they have proven themselves to be the most effective
organization in the region to get people involved and provide input on planning related
issues
Staff Response: Comment noted.
26. Policy LU 10.3. I'm concerned that the increased development in the " preferred" LUA at
Donner Lake will harm the viewsheds with taller buildings that are not designed to be
compatible with the environment.
Staff Response: The current maximum allowed height for parcels zoned "Neighborhood
Commercial" is 50-feet. With the draft 2040 General Plan, a new "Neighborhood Mixed-
Use" land use designation is proposed. Building height could be considered with zoning
code amendments.
27. Goal LU-11. The remaining residential parcels at Gray's should focus on local serving
housing, not vacation or second homes. Cottages, multi -family, townhomes, etc.
Staff Response: Remaining undeveloped non-single-family parcels within Gray's are
subject to the Gray's Crossing Specific Plan.
28. Policy LU-12.1. Protect the land in the SOI as protected open space to prevent sprawl and
unchecked growth.
Staff Response: The Council/Commission discussed the Town's Sphere of Influence at
their July 12, 2022 meeting and supported adding a policy to "extend the town's sphere to
better protect open space creation and conservation beyond Truckee’s current borders
and to facilitation potential annexation of those lands." A new Policy LU-12.A is included
in the September 27, 2022 joint Council/Commission staff report.
29. Policy LU 12.4. This feels like a very irresponsible policy. Without a clear path related to
where it is appropriate to put housing of any type, I do not support this policy and believe
it should be removed. The town should actively work with the adjacent communities and
employment centers to determine what types of housing will address the needs created
by the uses. Accessibility to transit and services is ideal.
Staff Response: Staff supports maintaining this policy as a general directive for housing
support.
Draft Mobility Element
1. Policy M-3.1. Minor language modification: I suggest removing the language "where
feasible". To me, this gives an out to simply not include things like bike racks.
Staff Response: This change is included in the September 27, 2022 joint
Council/Commission staff report.
Page 140
Item 7.1
September 19, 2022
Draft Safety and Noise Element
1. Policy SN-2.5. Nevada County Resource Conservation District should be included in the
agencies to collaborate on invasive species mitigation.
Staff Response: This change is included in the September 27, 2022 joint
Council/Commission staff report.
2. Goal SN-2. Wildfire. An area that does not appear to be covered in this section is the
unhealthy forest floor that currently exists due to years of pine needle accumulation. This
resinous surface repels water and further accelerates the declining tree health and
microbial layer in the ground.
Staff Response: Reference modification to Policy SN-2.6 included in the September 27,
2022 joint Council/Commission staff report.
3. Policy SN 6.4 & 6.5. Evacuation and alternative routes: these need to be coordinated with
the apps like Google Map and Waze. The apps can often exacerbate a bad situation
especially in a snow storm or evacuation situation.
Staff Response: Reference modification to Policy SN-6.5 included in the September 27,
2022 joint Council/Commission staff report.
4. Guiding Principles. How do we ensure the ongoing safety of operations at the Tahoe
Truckee Airport. There appears to be little we can do to influence the amount of plane
traffic, location of flight paths, noise, and other nuisances the airport creates. Public safety
is threatened due to the high altitude location. The number of planes traveling in full time
neighborhoods is putting everyone at risk.
Staff Response: The Town can actively engage with airport staff and the airport board.
The Town can also actively participate in any comprehensive plan updates where airport
operation modifications are proposed.
5. Goal SN-1. Zoning such as Upper McIver is at odds with this goal. Placing anyone, much
less vulnerable people such as seniors in a heavily wooded, steep topography adjacent
to interstate 80 is not good planning. This location is vulnerable to impacts from climate
change and should not have people living on it. Additionally, we should not continue to
encumber the wildlife habitats that utilize these lands for migration.
Staff Response: Comment noted.
6. Goal SN-7. How can the town protect the community from hazardous materials and risks
associated with the airport?
Staff Response: SN-7.6 includes monitoring aviation-related incidents. The Town could
take a more pro-active role in discussing aviation-related concerns with the airport general
Page 141
Item 7.1
September 19, 2022
manager, including requesting additional information on the airport district’s responsibility
in protecting surrounding communities.
7. Goal SN-8. The Glenshire neighborhood is consistently impacted by frequent and low
flying planes. This creates excessive noise and nuisance. Our peaceful mountain has not
been the same for the last couple of years due to the plane traffic. This includes planes
flying overhead from Reno and Carson City in addition to the town.
Staff Response: Comment noted. Reference modifications to Policy SN-8.17 and SN 8.18
included in the September 27, 2022 joint Council/Commission staff report.
8. Policy SN 8.3 & SN 8.8. Why do we have a policy discouraging the placement of noise
sensitive uses, such as senior living, when we are actively proposing to put seniors on
Upper McIver. No development should occur on this site, but this policy is directly at odds
with this zoning.
Staff Response: Any future development on Upper McIver would have to comply with
General Plan noise standards including Table SN-1.
9. Policy SN 8.16. We must do more than the status quo to address the flyover noise from
the airport. What is being done is not enough as the traffic has gotten worse, the flyovers
are outside the established flight paths and the airport claims their hands are tied.
Additionally, we must educate the pilots flying from Reno and Carson City who have begun
flying over Glenshire.
Staff Response: Reference modifications to Policy SN-8.17 and SN 8.18 included in the
September 27, 2022 joint Council/Commission staff report.
Draft Climate Action Plan
1. Action CAP 4.B and CAP 8.C. There is mentions of requirements for " all new residential
development". What is the definition of " new residential development"- for example, would
this include development of an ADU or would it only be for larger projects.
Staff Response: For CAP 4.B, “new residential development” can be defined as part of the
ordinance. The same applies to CAP 8.C—the Council can adopt whatever standard they
feel is appropriate.
Draft Community Character Element
1. Policy CC-1.2. Surrounding Natural Context Ensure that any new development in
Truckee’s lowland areas, including its forested areas and meadowlands, and in the
Truckee River Valley, does not reduce water quality or carbon sequestration, while also
contributesing es to and enhanceing the scenic quality and visual harmony of the natural
and built environment that comprises the Truckee townscape. [Source: 2025 General
Plan, Community Character Element, Policy P2.4]
Rationale for change: Since the 2025 General Plan was adopted, we have learned much
more about the importance of preserving meadowlands, both because this habitat is
decreasing throughout the Sierra Nevada overall and because of an increasing awareness
Page 142
Item 7.1
September 19, 2022
of their outsized role in preserving water quality and sequestering carbon. Lowlands, in
general, provide more productive natural environments because of their higher water
content. Other elements of the General Plan Update support their preservation. To be
consistent, this policy CC-1.2should be removed or revised. [See August 16, 2022, staff
response to council questions numbers 2 and 3]
Staff Response: This change is included in the September 27, 2022 joint
Council/Commission staff report.
2. Policy CC-1.9. Minimization Enchancement of Native Vegetation Disturbance
Encourage the preservation of trees and native vegetation, including specimen trees, and
minimize natural landscape disturbance in development projects, and select candidate
shrublands for re-forestation with Sugar Pine and other native conifers. [Source: 2025
General Plan, Community Character Element, Policy P2.10]
Rationale for change: Tree removal in the course of development projects and easement
expansions has reduced forest cover and carbon storage. The purpose of expanding the
Tree Preservation standards to include re-forestation is to partially offset the loss of native
trees, increase carbon sequestration, reduce soil-water evaporation, reduce radiative
heating of soil surfaces, and increase shade in areas currently dominated by sagebrush
and antelope bush.
Staff Response: Staff recommends incorporating re-forestation into Action CC-1.C (Tree
Preservation Standards) and Action CAP-6.A (Carbon Sequestration). Additional work is
needed to understand appropriate sites and what would be required as part of a
development project and staff’s proposed modifications would identify this need. Changes
in response to this comment are included in the September 27, 2022 joint
Council/Commission staff report.
3. Policy CC-3.4. Pedestrian-Oriented Design. Encourage pedestrian-oriented design
through the following measures:
o consideration of the relationship of the built environment to the qualities and
context of the landscape and natural environment in which it is situated.
o building design that is proportionate to the width of the street that it fronts, is
oriented to the street, and minimizes setbacks from the public right-of-way,
provides sufficient space for an anticipated increase in pedestrian use.
Rationale for change: There should be an optimal setback that encourages foot traffic,
while still allowing financially feasible development. A policy intended to minimize setbacks
works against this objective by promoting a limit on the space available for pedestrian use.
Staff Response: Staff supports the proposed modification. This change is included in the
September 27, 2022 joint Council/Commission staff report.
4. CC-3.7. Building Material Standards. Require new development projects to incorporate
materials, color schemes, and architectural styles that complement the landscape and the
rural and mountain environment, while also withstanding the climate challenges of the
mountains. The use of rustic and natural materials such as stone and wood, as well as
Page 143
Item 7.1
September 19, 2022
color palettes that reflect the natural environment, should be encouraged. [Source: 2025
General Plan, Community Character Element, Policy P12.2, modified]. Rationale for
change: The added language serves to draw attention to the increasing need for insulation
to address greater weather extremes and reduce energy demand.
Staff Response: Staff supports the proposed modification. This change is included in the
September 27, 2022 joint Council/Commission staff report.
5. CC-6.8. Full-time Residences. Monitor the ratio of full-time to part-time residents on a
regular basis in relation to protection of town character, providing work-force housing
opportunities, and providing enough land to accommodate jobs year-around. [Source:
New policy]. Rationale for change: The declining ratio of full-time to part-time residents
has been noted over the years as potentially affecting community connectivity and
character, as well as the supply of work-force housing. This policy and action treat the
potential issue at a threshold level by monitoring the ratio and examining the reason for
the changing ratio.
Staff Response: Reference new Action CC-6.F included in the September 27, 2022 joint
Council/Commission staff report.
6. CC-8.6. Protection of Views. Ensure that Minimize the impact of new developments or
substantial and improvements on the views of significant natural features on both sides of
Donner Pass Road continue to protect views of the surrounding forest and mountains,
where feasible. [Source: New policy, IG Strategy A.4.b]
Rationale for change: Proposed policy CC-8.6 is an excessively broad expansion of the
existing viewshed protection reflected in Figure CC-1 of the current Community Character
Element, given the absence of analysis of its potential effect on infill development. It also
mistakenly assumes that existing developments can be used as a guide for future
developments, when the more recent developments have partially reduced, rather than
entirely preserved, the views of the natural terrain. Finally, it creates uncertainty in the
development process. It would be better to establish a policy and action item directing the
establishment of objective design standards for protecting viewsheds, including, as an
example, an “angle of incidence” for the surrounding forest, that recognizes the need for
workforce housing as well as the preservation of views of vistas and forested hillsides.
Staff supports the proposed modification. This change is included in the September 27,
2022 joint Council/Commission staff report.
7. CC-1.C. Tree Preservation Vegetation Enhancement Standards. Review the
Development Code for opportunities to strengthen the tree preservation ordinance to
protect mature, significant trees, strengthen regulation on unpermitted removal of trees
and grading disturbance, and ensure tree succession planting where possible in the
project development process, and re-forestation of shrublands, while ensuring that
regulations are not in direct conflict with wildfire management goals. [Source: New action].
Rationale for change: Tree removal in the course of development projects and easement
expansions has reduced forest cover and carbon storage. The purpose of expanding the
Tree Preservation standards to include re-forestation is to partially offset the loss of native
Page 144
Item 7.1
September 19, 2022
trees, increase carbon sequestration, reduce soil-water evaporation, reduce radiative
heating of soil surfaces, and increase shade in areas currently dominated by sagebrush
and antelope bush.
Staff Response: Staff supports the proposed modification. This change is included in the
September 27, 2022 joint Council/Commission staff report.
8. CC-2.A. Lighting Inventory and Compliance Program. Conduct an inventory to identify
the most serious instances of light pollution, including potential festoon light pollution, in
Truckee. Implement a program to work with relevant public and private property owners
to retrofit, remove, or replace polluting fixtures. [Source: 2025 General Plan, Community
Character Element, Action A4.2]. Rationale for change: The increasing popularity of
festoon lighting is also increasing its impact as a potential source of light pollution. The
revision recognizes that festoon lighting can be a potential source of light pollution.
Staff Response: Staff recommends referring to new Action CC-2.C included in the
September 27, 2022 joint Council/Commission staff report in-lieu of the proposed
language. Staff believes the community should have the chance to weigh-in on regulating
festoon/holiday lighting. The results of that process can be used to determine if
inventorying festoon or holiday lighting is beneficial.
9. CC-6.C. User-Friendly Development Code. Consider amendments to the Development
Code or develop a user-friendly informational document to make the code more
understandable, simpler, and accessible to the broader community. [Source: New action]
Rationale for change: Making amendments simpler advances the objective of making
them more user-friendly.
Staff Response: Staff supports the proposed modification. This change is included in the
September 27, 2022 joint Council/Commission staff report.
10. CC-6.E. Full-time Residences. Annually monitor the ratio of full-time to part-time
residents. Consider reasons for decreased full-time residents and possible ways to
address this in the annual CDD Report and Council priorities. [Source: August 16, 2022,
staff response to council questions number 1]
Rationale for change: The declining ratio of full-time to part-time residents has been noted
over the years as potentially affecting community connectivity and character, as well as
the supply of work-force housing. This policy and action treat the potential issue at a
threshold level by monitoring the ratio and examining the reason for the changing ratio.
Staff Response: Reference new Action CC-6.F included in the September 27, 2022 joint
Council/Commission staff report.
11. CC-8.C. Develop objective design standards that might include setbacks, step-backs,
incidence of angle, and height limits for the purpose of limiting visual impacts of future
development on the views of the surrounding natural features along both sides of Donner
Pass Road. Identify the significant natural features deserving heightened protection.
Rationale for change: Proposed policy CC-8.6 is an excessively broad expansion of the
existing viewshed protection reflected in Figure CC-1 of the current Community Character
Page 145
Item 7.1
September 19, 2022
Element, given the absence of analysis of its potential effect on infill development. It also
mistakenly assumes that existing developments can be used as a guide for future
developments, when the more recent developments have partially reduced, rather than
entirely preserved, the views of the natural terrain. Finally, it creates uncertainty in the
development process. It would be better to establish a policy and action item directing the
establishment of objective design standards for protecting viewsheds, including, as an
example, an “angle of incidence” for the surrounding forest, that recognizes the need for
workforce housing as well as the preservation of views of vistas and forested hillsides.
Staff Response: Actions CC-3.A and CC-3.B identify amendments to the Development
Code to create objective design standards for residential and non-residential uses. Staff
believes these actions are adequate to address any desired standards for viewshed.
Draft Economic Development
1. ED-2.F: Tracking of Retail Sales Assessment of Retail Leakage, Assess what, if any,
action can be taken to address and overcome the causes of retail sales leakage. Track
changes in retail sales within categories and monitor increases in sales in categories
identified as having leakage. Periodically conduct a leakage analysis update to confirm
progress. [Source: 2009 Economic Development Strategy, modified]. The proposed action
to address “retail leakage,” although contained in the 2009 Implementation Strategy, does
not offset any of the causes. The 2020 BAE Market Study says leakage is due to the
“relative shortage of year-round lower wage retail workers,” the lower cost of goods in
Reno, the larger store sizes in Reno, our relatively small resident population, and the
convenience of e-commerce. The 2009 Economic Strategy, also prepared by BAE points
to the same causes. Accordingly, before investing staff time looking at the supply and
demand of different merchandise, there needs to be an assessment
of the utility of the effort. Investigating whether the effort is worth it could be part of ED-
1.B, the Economic Development Strategic Plan.
Staff Response: Reference revised Action ED-2.F included in the September 27, 2022
joint Council/Commission staff report.
2. ED-6.2: Relocation Opportunities for Industrial Uses
Provide opportunities for industrial uses currently located along the Truckee River in the
Downtown and West River District to relocate to other, more suitable locations. Incentivize
Prioritize the relocation of uses from along the south side of West River Street. while
preserving the existing industrial areas on the north side of the street for redevelopment
to accommodate existing and future industrial uses. [Source: 2025 General Plan,
Economic Development Element, Policy 8.4, modified]. This proposed revision is directed
at re-visiting whether it is in the long-term interest of the town to have light industry this
close to downtown in light of its value as mixed use or residential land.
Staff Response: The Council would want to discuss this change as it is a different direction
than the land use alternatives and purpose/description of the proposed Riverfront Mixed
Use Land Use Designation.
3. ED-2.9: This proposed policy to address “retail leakage” should be stricken and the
underlying assumptions addressed as part of Action ED-1.B. Although
Page 146
Item 7.1
September 19, 2022
contained in the 2009 Implementation Strategy, this policy does not offset any of the
causes. The 2020 BAE Market Study says leakage is due to the
“relative shortage of year-round lower wage retail workers,” the lower cost of goods in
Reno, the larger store sizes in Reno, our relatively small resident
population, and the convenience of e-commerce. The 2009 Economic Strategy, also
prepared by BAE points to the same causes. Accordingly, before
investing staff time looking at the supply and demand of different merchandise, there
needs to be an assessment of the utility of the effort.
Investigating whether the effort is worth it could be part of ED-1.B, the Economic
Development Strategic Plan.
Staff Response: Action ED-1.B is deleted in the September 27, 2022 joint
Council/Commission staff report. Revisions to ED-1.B will be considered with the October
12, 2022 draft Economic Development Element revisions.
4. ADD: New ED-6.A Create a Truckee River corridor enhancement program that
implements the goals of the Downtown River Revitalization Strategy.
This proposed addition serves to implement Policy ED-6.1 Riverfront Redevelopment and
ED-6.2 Relocation Opportunities for Industrial Uses. [see
August 16, 2022 Council Q and A, staff response ED # 74]
Staff Response: Reference new Action ED-6.A included in the September 27, 2022 joint
Council/Commission staff report.
5. ED-4.E. Policies ED-4.7 (Expansion of Local Housing Supply), 4.8 (Evaluation of Job
Creation Impacts), and 4.9 (Housing Policies and Local Workforce Needs)
would all benefit from the acquisition of data showing the number of Truckee job positions
that exist at different income levels. Accordingly, Staff stated
in item 10 of the August 16, 2022 ED questions and answers that the following language
can be added as an action item in the next draft of the GP
update: “Acquire Truckee-specific data quantifying the number of employees we have at
different wage and salary levels, along with Truckee-specific
data on the number of residents we have at different income levels.” This data can help
the Town more accurately ascertain how to shape housing
policies to allow people who work here to live here.
Staff Response: Reference new Action ED-4.F included in the September 27, 2022 joint
Council/Commission staff report.
6. Action ED-4.E: Historically Truckee has not required a business license and ED-1.6
specifically addresses the desire to mitigate the cost of doing business. Most other
jurisdictions once they adopt a business license strategy in addition to license fees they
also require quarterly payments of "Mill Tax" or payment of a
percentage of gross receipts. Does the Town of Truckee envision a similar revenue
measure, and if so is this just one more burden on local business?
Page 147
Item 7.1
September 19, 2022
Staff Response: No the staff is not envisioning a revenue measure. The concept is similar
to short-term rental permits, where the cost is based on cost to the Town to manage and
operate the program.
Draft Conservation and Open Space Element
1. COS-1.4: Consistent with CAP Policy 6.2 and action items 6.A and 6.B, add a fifth bulleted
item stating "maximize carbon sequestration." [See staff response in
August 16, 2022 Council/Commission Q and A, COS # 2.
Staff Response: Reference modified Action COS-1.4 included in the September 27, 2022
joint Council/Commission staff report.
2. COS-6.1: Add a sentence stating "Select candidate shrublands for re-forestation with
Sugar Pine and other native conifers."
This additional language is needed for multiple reasons. Tree removal in the course of
development projects and easement expansions has reduced
forest cover and carbon storage. The identification of areas suitable for re-forestation is to
partially offset the loss of native trees, increase carbon
sequestration, reduce soil-water evaporation, reduce radiative heating of soil surfaces,
and increase shade in areas currently dominated by sagebrush
and antelope bush.
Staff Response: Reference modified Action CAP-6.A, Action CC-1.C and Policy SN-2.6
included in the September 27, 2022 joint Council/Commission staff report.
Draft Downtown Truckee Plan
1. Appendix B-Downtown Truckee Plan. This section states that no increased density has
been proposed beyond the existing Downtown Specific Plan. This seems like a lost
opportunity given we should be increasing density in the core of town and not the
periphery. Had the focus of the LUA process been to identify opportunities for increased
locals' housing.
Staff Response: Comment noted.
General Comments
1. General Goal. There are a few goals that have a responsible party assigned. I would like
to see more of these even if they are partially responsible or a potential
partner to accomplish that specific goal.
Staff Response: Planning staff are responsible for General Plan implementation and in
this role coordinate will all applicable staff, agencies, special districts and community
partners to fulfill General Plan goals.
2. Vision Statement. Unsure how we are an inclusive community when we are only able to
implement a 15% inclusionary housing policy and we have not fulfilled the requirement of
the Joerger Ranch Specific Plan to build 50%of the housing for the created workforce. We
have built 0 units to date. I’m concerned that inclusive is not the appropriate word for our
Page 148
Item 7.1
September 19, 2022
vision unless we are willing to do more tangible work to house our local workforce. We are
increasing the number of market rate units beyond our current 2025 GP with no plan to
address the impacts of this decision. Additionally, we are increasing the number of service
level jobs with increased commercial and industrial square footage without a plan to house
these workers. Over 75%of workers either leave Truckee for work or commute to Truckee
for work per the Briefing Book.
Staff Response: Comment noted.
3. Introduction. The GP Update Process Section. I participated in GPAC from the outset,
mostly as a member and a few times as a public citizen. I don’t feel there was ever clear
direction provided from GPAC at any time. There were comments shared but there was
never a recommendation made to the Planning Commission or Town Council for a
preferred land use alternative. Often there was push back from the GPAC that members
dtidn' feel their voices or the public's voices were being heard or reflected in the
information provided by Ascent. This was a theme carried throughout the process.
Staff Response: Comment noted.
Housing
1. General Comment. Introduction: Guiding Principle Housing Element. Bullet point 3 does
not seem congruent in that the new plan advocates for multistory, multi - family buildings
that are not typically in line with Truckee's character. The size and scale make it difficult
to integrate naturally into the environment. Bullet point 4 could be split into two separate
points. What are avoidable governmental constraints?
Staff Response: Comment noted. “Avoidable governmental constraints” could include
regulations, development standards, permit costs, etc.
2. General Comment. Introduction. Workforce Housing Terminology. The use of the term
Workforce Housing is used throughout this section yet is not clear about what it means or
entails. It would be helpful to have a clear understanding of what it means to be a
workforce housing project. Are there deed restrictions? Targeted users? Income
restrictions? Etc.
Staff Response: Staff agrees that defining workforce housing is important. The benefit of
not including a set definition in the General Plan is that it can be defined by policy and
adapted without doing a General Plan amendment. In addition, the Town’s Workforce
Housing ordinance is reviewed annually, and a definition could be considered as part of
this process. The current Housing Element also requires the Town to define “achievable
housing” which creates another opportunity to re-visit the definition of workforce housing.
3. Action H-4.3, 4.4. The attached Current Housing Element, Programs H-4.3 and H-4.4,
calls for the review of these programs "as part of the 2040 General Plan Update." These
two programs are directed at preserving and improving mobile home parks. The urgency
of these programs has grown in tandem with the urgency of the overall housing crisis and
Page 149
Item 7.1
September 19, 2022
their review should not be further postponed. If there is an aversion to touching the
Housing Element at this time, these programs can be incorporated into or divided among
the Economic, Land Use, Community Character, Safety, and Climate Action Elements.
Staff Response: The General Plan Update process ultimately was not scoped to include
modifications to the Housing Element. However, the Council and Commission discussed
adding a new Action LU-2.1 to conduct a public process to modify existing zoning for
mobile home parks to “Mobile Home Park” zoning. In addition, Housing Element
implementation is reviewed and reported on annually, both with the Annual Community
Development Report and through State mandated housing reporting.
4. Are the population and household size numbers based on the % of dwellings that are
assumed to have full time habitation? Or, are they including 100% of our the currently
built households? How are 2nd homes and STRs being accounted for in the average
household size and population calculations?
Staff Response:
Population and household size numbers are based on full time occupants
They do not include 100% of our current built households
STRs and 2nd homes are counted as vacant units held for seasonal/vocational use. This
aligns with how units are counted for the Census Bureau American Community
Survey. 2nd homes and STRs are considered as part of the vacancy rate and not
counted toward the population calculations
5. Making reasonable assumptions that 15% of our lots, get subdivided by right per new
state law, how many more buildable lots will that create and thereby, how many more
units will that create? Making the same reasonable assumption that 15% of our
properties proceed with ADU creation, how many units/people is that?
Staff Response:
Estimates for SB-9 and ADU with 15% Assumption
Zoning Parcels (1) SB-9 (1) ADU (2)
DRM 100 15
DRS 49 7
RR 778 117
RS 11,553 1,733 1,733
Total 12,480 1,733 1,872
(1) Removed parcels containing the following owner parcels: Tahoe Donner Association, Tahoe Sierra
Meadows HOA, Truckee Donner Land Trust, Coyote Moon; removed parcels containing common areas,
open spaces, nonnumbered lots. Does not include mobile homes.
(2) SB9 Assumptions: 15% of parcels assumption; Does not include parcels in the historic district or RR
parcels
Page 150
Item 7.1
September 19, 2022
(3) ADU Assumptions: 15% of all residential parcels (DRM, DRS, RR, RS); Does not include DMU, DRH, DRM
(although, MFR can have ADUs); 15% of all residential parcels (DRM, DRS, RR, RS)
Does not include DMU, DRH, DRM (although, MFR can have ADUs); Does not include opportunities for
JADUs
6. Based on 2025 zoning/buildout scenarios but overlaying the reasonable % I describe above,
what would our buildout numbers look like?
Staff Response:
2025 GP Buildout with ADU & SB-9 Estimates
2025 GP Buildout 18,524
ADU Estimates 1,872
SB-9 Estimates 1,733
Total 22,129
Draft 2040 GP Buildout with ADU & SB-9 Estimates
2040 GP Buildout 19,318
ADU Estimates 1,872
SB-9 Estimates 1,733
Total 22,923
Page 151
Item 7.1
LOS Thresholds for the General Plan Page 1
Date: September 19, 2022
To: File
From: Becky Bucar, Engineering Manager
Subject: LOS Thresholds for the General Plan
The purpose of this memo is to present the draft 2040 General Plan Mobility Element’s
Level of Service standards and discuss the implications of removing the standards all
together.
Background
Level of service (LOS) is used to describe traffic operating conditions along a roadway
or at an intersection. In the General Plan traffic analysis, roadway LOS is based upon a
comparison of the traffic volume along the roadway to the capacity of that roadway,
whereas intersection LOS is based on the delay associated with vehicles making specific
thru or turning movements at an intersection.
Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) is a metric that accounts for the number of vehicle trips
generated and the length or distance of those trips. One VMT is one vehicle traveling on
a roadway for one mile. VMT is also the metric used for California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) analyses per the relatively recent SB 743 California law (discussed further
below).
The current draft of the Town of Truckee General Plan Mobility Element includes the
following Level of Service Policy:
M-4.4
Level of Service
Establish and maintain the following summer weekday PM peak hour level of
service (LOS) standards in the portions of the town that are outside of the
Downtown area depicted in Figure M-6:
LOS D or better on road segments
Total intersection LOS D or better for signalized intersections
Individual turning movements at roundabouts and unsignalized
intersections shall not be allowed to reach LOS F and to exceed a
cumulative vehicle delay of four vehicle hours. Both of these conditions
shall be met for traffic operations to be considered unacceptable.
Page 152
Item 7.1
LOS Thresholds for the General Plan Page 2
Improvements are planned to the Bridge Street/Donner Pass Road, Bridge
Street/West River Street/East River Street, and Glenshire Drive/Church Street
intersections, in addition to the extension of Church Street, as shown in Figure M-
1. Completion of these projects will improve circulation in Downtown Truckee but
will result in level of service conditions less than LOS D. While the improvements
in Figure M-1 have been determined to be necessary, no level of service standards
shall apply to the roadways and intersections in the core Downtown area depicted
in Figure M-6, including Bridge Street/Donner Pass Road, Bridge Street/River
Street, Glenshire Drive/Truckee Way, Glenshire Drive/Church Street, and Donner
Pass Road/Spring Street but excluding West River Street/McIver Crossing. Two-
way left-turn lanes shall not be used as a way to meet LOS thresholds at
unsignalized intersections. Instead, roundabout or other capacity-improving
treatments should be prioritized. [Source: 2025 General Plan, Mobility Element,
Policy 2.1, modified]
This proposed policy is similar to the existing General Plan LOS policy, except that the
existing policy sets a LOS E for Downtown intersections. The proposed policy proposes
to eliminate the LOS thresholds in Downtown Truckee all together.
During the draft 2040 General Plan review process, a question was raised as to whether
the LOS thresholds should be removed from the General Plan policies improvements to
LOS reduce congestion and associated delay and thereby, potentially induce more vehicle
travel through increased vehicle capacity. This approach could potentially be inconsistent
with the broader goals of the General Plan which places an emphasis on moving people
as opposed to cars through investments in mass transit, Transportation Demand
Management, and other alternative forms of transportation.
VMT for CEQA Analyses
When reviewing and evaluating projects, SB 743 requires agencies to use VMT instead
of LOS for purposes of CEQA transportation impacts (starting in 2020). According to the
law "new methodologies under the California Environmental Quality Act [were] needed for
evaluating transportation impacts that are better able to promote the state’s goals of
reducing greenhouse gas emissions and traffic-related air pollution, promoting the
development of a multimodal transportation system, and providing clean, efficient access
to destinations.” The California Office of Planning and Research website provides some
helpful information explaining the change from LOS to VMT as a CEQA metric:
“The challenges with using LOS as the measure of transportation impacts in
CEQA…include:
Burdens last-in infill development with costly mitigation that undermines
neighborhood quality.
Leads to more sprawl instead of encouraging more walkable neighborhoods.
Forces cities to prioritize cars over people walking, biking, and taking transit, which
leads to more car travel and exacerbates regional congestion.
Causes development to be more spread out, ironically making it harder for
residents to reach their daily destinations without driving long distances
By generating more vehicle travel, LOS leads to an array of environmental impacts
and impacts to human health.
Page 153
Item 7.1
LOS Thresholds for the General Plan Page 3
…What are the benefits of moving to a VMT metric?
VMT is a measure of the transportation system’s impact on the climate, the
environment, and human health. VMT also provides an indication of the access to
economic and social opportunity, with lower VMT areas requiring less driving and
generally providing better access to daily destinations such as jobs and services.
LOS and the Proposed Truckee General Plan
Intersection LOS conditions for 32 study intersections were evaluated by LSC
Transportation Consultants, Inc. for the Draft EIR. Under the build out of the Proposed
Truckee General Plan scenario, intersection LOS thresholds were identified to be
exceeded at seven (7) locations within the Town boundaries (excluding the Downtown
intersections where no thresholds are proposed) but roadway LOS was not exceeded at
any location. Therefore, application of the proposed LOS thresholds (per the Draft Mobility
Element) results in improvements being required at seven of the study intersections (with
the installation of roundabouts) and no roadway widening. The only additional roadway
capacity being proposed as a part of the General Plan Update (outside of the intersection
widening for roundabouts) is the implementation of the Pioneer Trail and Bridge Street
Extension project, which will add new east-west and north-south roadway connections
through the center of town (connecting Northwoods Boulevard to Pioneer Trail to Bridge
Street).
The table below identifies the proposed intersection improvements, as well as the planned
signals at the Bridge Street intersections, which are not subject to LOS thresholds under
the Proposed General Plan alternative because they are in Downtown.
Table A: Intersections with Proposed Improvements
Intersection Description of Improvement Measure
LOS Exceeded At
I-80 WB On/Off Ramp/Donner Pass Road 1 Lane Roundabout
SR 89 South/Frates Lane/Donner Pass Road 2 Lane Roundabout
W River Street/McIver Crossing 1 Lane Roundabout
I-80 EB Off Ramp/Truckee Way 2 Lane Roundabout
Truckee Way/Pioneer Trail Roundabout 2 Lane Roundabout
I-80 WB On/Off Ramp/SR 89 North 2 Lane Roundabout
I-80 EB On/Off Ramp/SR 267 2 Lane Roundabout
SR 267/Brockway Road/Soaring Way Multi-Lane Roundabout
No LOS Thresholds but Improvements Planned
Donner Pass Road/Bridge Street Traffic Signal
W River Street/Bridge Street Traffic Signal
While the General Plan EIR uses VMT for purposes of evaluating the General Plan under
CEQA, staff has proposed to keep some LOS thresholds in the General Plan for the
following reasons:
1. Increased Intersection Delay. Removing all LOS standards will likelyresult in long
travel delays and vehicle queues at several intersections throughout Town. To
demonstrate this point, staff calculated the summer PM peak-hour vehicle delay at
several study intersections under the following conditions: existing (2018); future
Page 154
Item 7.1
LOS Thresholds for the General Plan Page 4
(2040) General Plan build out without any intersection improvements; and future
(2040) General Plan build out with improvements implemented. Figure A below
provides a comparison of these scenarios for intersections that require
improvements to meet LOS standards. As the figure and associated chart depict,
the delay per vehicle at many of the intersections is projected to substantially grow
without improvements. Implementation of the intersection improvements reduce
delay to conditions that are very close to existing conditions. To avoid the need to
widen roads in the future, staff is also recommending that the General Plan Policy
M-4.4 be amended to only establish a roadway LOS D on Donner Pass Road.
2. Challenges with Significant Mode Shift. While increases in vehicle travel time
and congestion have the potential to facilitate mode shifts in urban areas, this
mode shift is more difficult to achieve in rural areas where there are less multi-
modal options and lower land use densities required to support convenient transit
use. Per the table below (from the General Plan Existing Conditions report), 1% of
Truckee’s population currently uses transit to get to work, while another 4% walk
or bike. While implementation of the General Plan policies will increase the use of
transit and active transportation modes, it is unclear whether the mode shift
required to avoid future increases in intersection delays is achievable. This is
partially because much of the peak vehicle congestion is generated by regional
travelers and visitors (accessing areas beyond Truckee and the north shore of
Lake Tahoe) over which the Town has less control.
3. Equity. Increased vehicle delays could result in inequitable impacts to those with
less flexibility and access. For example, riding a bike is not a viable year-round
option. In addition, our transit service is limited in funding and therefore is has
limited in service area and hours of operation, and frequency (currently one-hour
headways), all of which limit transit capacity and the ability to meet local and
regional travel needs, especially those traveling to and from work. While some
people could shift their schedules (leave earlier or later to miss the peak commute
periods) or work from home, many do not have that flexibility, especially in
disadvantaged, low-income, or underserved populations, resulting in an
inequitable impact of those delays.
4. LOS Exemption in Downtown. The intersection analysis in Figure A focuses on
intersections that require improvements to meet LOS standards but also includes
the Bridge Street/Donner Pass Road and Bridge Street/West River Street
intersections for which traffic signals are planned. These intersections would not
be subject to LOS thresholds under the Proposed General Plan and so the delay
presented in the map at the bottom of the figure represents an “unimproved” delay.
The absence of LOS thresholds in downtown will result in increased delay but the
distinction is that downtown is more walkable, accessible by bike because of its
Page 155
Item 7.1
LOS Thresholds for the General Plan Page 5
central location, and is well served by transit. Therefore, downtown Truckee
provides more opportunity for people to shift travel modes from private
automobiles. This mode shift is more difficult in other areas in Town or for regional
travel.
5. Reduced Vehicle Emissions. Vehicle delay at intersections results in
unnecessary vehicle idling. Although staff has not specifically evaluated the impact
of this additional intersection delay on greenhouse gas emissions, the Donner
Pass Road/Northwoods Boulevard Intersection Control Evaluation compared the
emissions of a traffic signal to a roundabout (which results in less stopped/idle
time) during peak hours and over a 24-hour period. The analysis found the
implementation of a roundabout at the location would reduce Carbon Monoxide
(CO), Nitrous Oxide NOx), and volatile organic compounds (VOC) by 15%, 14%,
and 16%, respectively.
6. Avoid Potential Safety Issues. When traffic congestion becomes excessive, it
can result in an increase in safety issues, especially at unsignalized intersections.
This was the case before the roundabouts were built at the I-80/SR 89 South ramps
where congestion and delays resulted in drivers waiting for smaller gaps in traffic
before making turns out of or onto the ramp, resulting in higher collision rates
compared to other unsignalized intersections in the Town. Traffic queues and
delays can also impact emergency access.
7. Ability to Use Traffic Impact Fee Program to Spread Costs. One of the
arguments against using LOS is that it can burden “last-in” development. However,
the Town has a traffic impact fee program, which allows developers to pay a fee
towards the intersection improvements as opposed to funding them up front. This
fee program has helped to fund improvements (e.g., the Western Railroad
Undercrossing, I-80/SR 89 S roundabouts, bike lanes on Glenshire Drive and West
River Street, etc.)
8. Required Access Improvements for Development. Without LOS thresholds, the
Town would not have a mechanism to require new developments to install
improvements for safe and efficient operation at their access points. For example,
the Hilltop Master Plan currently requires the construction of a roundabout on
Brockway Road and the site access. Without a LOS policy, development could
have potentially proceeded with no improvements to the intersection, resulting in
traffic queues and associated safety issues.
9. Other General Plan Policies. The LOS policy is proposed to be implemented in
conjunction with several other polices that promote in-fill development; discourage
sprawl; develop transportation demand strategies; and encourage walkable
neighborhoods, biking and transit, thereby reducing single occupancy vehicles and
associated VMT.
Page 156
Item 7.1
LOS Thresholds for the General Plan Page 6
Figure A: PM Peak Hour Intersection Vehicle Delay (2018, 2040 Unimproved, 2040 Improved)
Notes: Delay at the following intersections was calculated to exceed 200 seconds per vehicle and may overstate actual delay: I -80 WB On/Off Ramp/Donner Pass
Road, I-80 EB Off Ramp/Truckee Way, I-80 WB On/Off Ramp/SR 89 North, and SR 267/Brockway Road/Soaring Way. In addition, improved LOS at the SR
267/Brockway/Soaring intersection represents a LOS C delay which would result in a multi-lane roundabout but for which a LOS calculation is not available.
Page 157
Item 7.1