The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My Public Portal About2022-02-08 packetIndividuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. Please call 573-634-6410 for information regarding agenda items. NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING AND TENTATIVE AGENDA i City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission Tuesday, February 8, 2022, ~ 6:00 p.m. City Council Chambers- John G. Christy Municipal Building-320 E. McCarty Street Virtual Option-WebEx Click Here to Join Virtually Password: 1234 Join by Phone: +14043971516 US Toll Access Code: 2484 815 5514 TENTATIVE AGENDA 1. Introductions and Roll Call 2. Procedural Matters • Determination of quorum • Call for cases • Receive and review requests for continuance • Receive requests for reordering the agenda • Format of hearing • List of exhibits 3. Adoption of Agenda (as printed or reordered) 4. Approval of January 11, 2022, Regular Meeting Minutes 5. Old Business a. Work Session 6. New Business a. Landmark Awards b. Historic Context Project-Rory Krupp 7. Other Business a. Code Revision Update b. Preservation Month-May 2022 c. Missouri Preservation Conference- June 13-15, 2022 8. Public Comment 9. Dates to Remember a. Next Regular Meeting Date, March 8, 2022 10. Adjournment City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission Application for Nomination Landmark Designation Award Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573)634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. We invite you to nominate your building/structure to be reviewed by the Historic Preservation Commission and designated as a local Landmark. See attached page for information about this award. This form must be completed by the owner of the property nominated and returned no later than February 28 annually. Please fill out the below information in complete detail. Please submit a current photo(s) of the property being nominated. If applicable, older photos may also be submitted. Return the application to: City of Jefferson, Landmark Designation Award, c/o Rachel Senzee, 320 E. McCarty Street, Jefferson City, MO 65101 or email to rsenzee@jeffcitymo.org. If you have questions please call 573-634-6410. Contact Information: Owner: Address: Contact Person: Phone No. Email Address: Will the owner display the plaque on the building?  Yes  No (if no please explain) Property Information: Historic Name (if known) Year Built History & Significance, include details such as builder, unique facts of previous owners Attach additional pages if necessary: I am the owner of this property and am aware of this application for Landmark Award and agree to accept the award if nominated by the City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission: Owner’s Signature Date City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission Application for Nomination Landmark Designation Award Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573)634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. What is the Landmark Designation Award? The Landmark Award is an honorary designation and is made by the City of Jefferson’s Historic Preservation Commission which recognizes a property’s historical significance and contribution to the community. Each year since 1994, the Commission recognizes several buildings or properties as Landmark Award properties. Properties that have received the Landmark Award represent the full range of Jefferson City’s heritage and architectural style. The properties include governmental properties, educational institutions, residences, retail stores, manufacturing properties, houses of worship, and freestanding monuments. Some have been restored to their original use. Others have been restored and put to new uses. Some are part of the State’s park system. Others have not been restored or preserved. Whatever their condition or use, the Commission truly appreciates the willingness of the individual property owners to allow their properties to be recognized for the historic and architectural contribution they make to our community. Applications submitted by the property owner are reviewed at the Historic Preservation Commission’s March regular meeting where the review process begins and evaluated by the following criteria: • The historic, architectural or cultural significance of the property, as those terms are defined under the City’s preservation ordinance • The type of property involved, including its historic use and its present use • The location of the property, including the overall historical context of the area and the property’s contribution to the area and surrounding properties • The historic architectural integrity of the property, including whether efforts have been made to preserve or restore the property • Whether the property is endangered Final selections of the awardees are then designated by the City Council, each by separate ordinance. In May of each year during the City’s Preservation Week activities, the awards are presented to the owners along with a Designated Landmark plaque for permanent display on the building or property. After a landmark or historic district is designated by ordinance, each application for building permit within the area so designated referred to the City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission for review at a regularly scheduled meeting. This process is only intended as an opportunity for the Historic Preservation Commission to advise property owners with means and methods of historic preservation. ATTACHMENT A: SCOPE, PURPOSE AND DESCRIPTION OF GRANT ACTIVITIES City of Jefferson, Missouri Historic Context of Jefferson City Project No. 29-21-10029-011 Starting Date: Sept. 1, 2021 Ending Date: August 31, 2022 I. SCOPE AND PURPOSE: The City of Jefferson will hire a 36 CFR 61 , Appendix A, qualified historian or architectural historian (herein referred to as “consultant”) to develop a historic context of Jefferson City. II. ACTIVITIES AND FUNCTIONS: A. Consultant Selection Process The City of Jefferson shall contract with a 36 CFR Part 61, Appendix A, qualified historian or architectural historian (herein referred to as Consultant) to assist city staff and the Historic Preservation Commission in creating a histo ric c ontext. The sub-recipient shall require the language of the certification and terms applicable to financial assistance awards to be included in sub-award document at all tiers, and sub-recipients shall certify and disclose accordingly, pursuant to 2 CFR 200.331. The Request for Proposals (RFP ) shall include a copy of Attachment A: Scope, Purpose and Description of Grant Activities and the Milestone Schedule from the Grant Agreement with financial information removed. All contractual deadlines established with the Consultant shall not conflict with milestone deadlines set in the grant agreement. City staff will serve as the primary point of contact for this project and will be expected to ensure milestones are submitted to the HPF Grant Manager or their designee on a timely basis. A draft RFP will be sent to the HPF Grant Manager or their designee for approval prior to initiating the bid process . Documentation of the Consultant selection process and a draft of the contract shall be submitted to the HPF Grant Manger or their designee for approval before it is signed. B. The historic context shall be developed with the intent to guide the future of architectural/historic survey work and National Register of Historic Places nominations within the City of Jefferson. The historic context shall be prepared according to the National Park Service’s National Register Bulletin, “How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation,” a historic context is “an organizing structure for interpreting history that groups information about historic properties that share a common theme, common geographic area, and a common time period. The development of historic contexts is a foundation for decisions about the planning, identification, evaluation, registration and treatment of historic properties based upon comparative historical significance.” The hired C onsultant acting on behalf of the c ity sha ll create a Historic Context for Jefferson City . The historic context shall be prepared to serve as a tool aiding in the identification and evaluation of resources within Jefferson City by focusing on and explaining what aspects of geography, history, and culture significantly shaped the physical development of Jefferson City. The historic context shall examine land use patterns and built environment over time, what property types were important and associated development patterns, why the developments were Grant Agreement Scope, Purpose and Description City of Jefferson , Cole County, Missouri Page 2 important, and what characteristics they need to have to be considered an important representation of their type and context. The historic context shall provide the background necessary to understand why a resource may be significant and will identify and explain in detail patterns, themes or trends that shaped the City’s development. Special consideration, potentially a chapter in the context, shall be given to examine the City of Jefferson’s past planning practices, specifically zoning , that contributed to any discriminatory practices that would have affected an individual based on their race or ethnicity. This examination will likely include examining any exclusionary zoning, racially restrictive covenants, and redlining practices that took place in Jefferson City. The City of Jefferson has identified this as an important aspect of the historic context so they can understand how past decision on zoning and land use patterns have contributed to the market-driven displacement and exclusionary neighborhood patterns with significant and deleterious consequences for individuals based on their race or ethnicity. The process and final product shall include but is not be limited to: 1. A minimum of one initial consultation meeting between c ity staff, the Historic Preservation Commission and the C onsultant to discuss any existing historic context documents , the process envisioned by the c ity, and what the c ity and Commission’s expectations are for the historic context. 2. A minimum of two public meetings to solicit citizen input. A minimum of one meeting shall be at the start of the process to explain the historic context to the community. A minimum of one meeting at the end of the process shall be held to present the context. 3. Research and write a historic context the historic context must be prepared in accordance with: Wyatt, Barbara, “The Components of a Historic Context: A National Register White Paper,” April 9, 2009 https://dahp.wa.gov/sites/default/files/White_paper_on_historic_context_4-09.pdf 4. The c ity shall post notices of public meetings on their website and at City Hall and provide opportunities for citizen comment. 5. Submit at least two drafts of the historic context to the HPF Grant Manager or their designee for review and approval as outlined in the Milestone/Payment Schedule; 6. Submit the completed historic context to the HPF Grant Manager or their designee in both hard and electronic copy. The City shall also make the final historic context available to the public for download from the City of Jefferson website. C. Grant products will include: 1. A draft Request for Proposal (RFP ) to hire the consultant who will develop the historic context. Submitted prior to the initiation of the bid process. 2. Email documentation of the consultant selection process and a draft of the consultant contract prior to signature. This documentation includes: a. Indication of who the RFP was sent to and when b. Copies of all responses received (proposals, resumes, and responses of no bid) c. Score sheets/an explanation for why the selected consultant was chosen d. The unsigned draft consultant contract noted above Grant Agreement Scope, Purpose and Description City of Jefferson , Cole County, Missouri Page 3 3. Submit a copy of the signed consultant contract. 4. Copies of all notices of public meeting, meeting or workshop minutes/notes and s ign -in sheets. 5. An e -mail including the URL for the historic context once it has been posted on the City’s website. D. Public Meetings The grant recipient will conduct a minimum of two public meetings in Jefferson City to inform owners of properties within the survey area and the interested public about the goals and scope of the survey project. The first meeting will be held as near to the beginning of the survey as practical and the second meeting will be conducted at the conclusion of the project, when survey results and recommendations will be presented. Meetings should be primarily informative in nature, but may also be used to solicit information from knowledgeable members of the public. The documentation required for the public meeting will include a copy of the public meeting notice, the agenda, and the sign-in sheet or record of attendance. III. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: A. The procedures and requirements contained herein are subject to applicable laws and regulations, and any changes made to these laws and regulations, subsequent to the execution of this agreement. In the event that these procedures and requirements conflict with applicable federal laws, regulations and policies, the following order of precedence will prevail: 1. Federal law 2. Code of Federal Regulations 3. Terms and conditions of grant award 4. Historic Preservation Fund Grant Manual The provisions included herein shall also be applied by the State to subgrantees and contractors performing work under this program. B. It is agreed that if the project should fall one (1) month behind the milestones, the Missouri Department of Natural Resources has the right unilaterally to terminate or reduce the dollar amount of this agreement. In addition, if the Department determines that full termination is warranted, the Department shall be sole authority in determining the amount of compensation owed. C. All work related to this project will either be supervised or completed by personnel who meet 36 CFR 61, Appendix A, professional qualifications for historian or architectural historian. D. The Jefferson City Historic Preservation Commission will have an opportunity to review and comment on milestone products before they are submitted to the HPF Grant Manager or their designee if they so choose. Any Commission comments will be submitted with the corresponding milestone to the HPF Grant Manager or their designee . Grant Agreement Scope, Purpose and Description City of Jefferson , Cole County, Missouri Page 4 E. All grant project funded publications, books, brochures and all public meeting notices regarding this grant project shall include the following acknowledgement: This material was produced with assistance from the Historic Preservation Fund, administered by the National Park Service, Department of the Interior, of the U.S. Government and Missouri Department of Natural Resources, State Historic Preservation Office. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of the Interior or the Department of Natural Resources, State Historic Preservation Office, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation. [This acknowledgement may be in any size type on the notice] Project work will be completed and payments made according to the milestone/payment schedule and project budget that follows. Grant Agreement Scope, Purpose and Description City of Jefferson , Cole County, Missouri Page 5 MILESTONE/PAYMENT SCHEDULE City of Jefferson, Missouri Historic Context of Jefferson City Project No. 29-21-10029-011 Starting Date: Sept. 1, 2021 Ending Date: August 31, 2022 Milestone Product Date Due Federal Share Non-Federal Share #1 Submit a draft RFP to the HPF Grant Manager or their designee before the bid process is initiated. 10/01/2021 $ 0 $ 0 #2 Submit documentation of the consultant selection process and a draft of the consultant contract prior to signature submitted to the HPF Grant Manager or their designee for review and approval. 12/01/2021 $ 0 $ 0 #3 Submit a copy of signed consultant contract to the HPF Grant Manager or their designee . 01/01/2022 $ 0 $ 0 #4 Submit the agenda, minutes, and sign-in sheets from the first meeting between the City, Historic Preservation Commission , and consultant to the HPF Grant Manager or their designee. 01/15/2022 $ 0 $ 0 #5 Submit to HPF Grant Manager or their designee sign -in sheet and minutes from first public meeting. 01/31/2022 $ 0 $ 0 #6 Submit to HPF Grant Manager or their designee the first draft of historic context for review and approval. 03/15/2022 $ 0 $ 0 # Submit second draft of the historic context to the HPF Grant Manager or their designee for review and approval, complete with all text, photography and graphic design. 05/15/2022 Estimated 50% of expenses Estimated 50% of expenses # Submit final copy of the report and sign -in sheet and minutes from final public meeting. 07/15/2022 $ 0 $ 0 #9 Submit required copies of final completed historic context to HPF Grant Manager or their designee . Submit final project report and fiscal data 07/31/2022 $ 0 $ 0 #10 Submission of final project report and fiscal data. 08/30/2022 Estimated remaining expenses Estimated remaining expenses TOTALS: 1 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS HISTORIC CONTEXT OF JEFFERSON CITY The City of Jefferson is issuing a Request for Proposals (RFP) for a qualified consultant to provide professional research and writing services to develop a Historic Context Study of the City of Jefferson, Missouri. The City of Jefferson seeks to develop a Historic Context Study that will present a thematic overview of the history of the City and identify historic resource types associated with each identified theme. The study will synthesize primary and secondary source research on the development of the area with the results from the field survey. Background The National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, directs the federal government to assist the States in carrying out historic preservation activities. The Act authorized the establishment and funding of State Historic Preservation Offices to carry out comprehensive state surveys of historic properties and to nominate significant properties to the National Register of Historic Places. In Missouri, the State Historic Preservation Office is located within the Department of Natural Resources. Due to limitations in staff size, the Department of Natural Resources carries out survey and nomination activities primarily through a program of federal Historic Preservation Fund (HPF) grant awards to organizations, agencies, local governments, and other parties throughout the state. In concert with federal regulations governing the use of HPF monies, the Department of Natural Resources requires that grant-funded projects be carried out by qualified professionals. While many organizations, agencies, and local governments may have in-house professional staff qualified to carry out survey and nomination activities, other project sponsors may need to contract with professional historians or architectural historians for those services on a case-by-case basis. To assist project sponsors in the task of locating qualified consultants. This RFP has been developed to identify qualified individuals capable of carrying out this type of work. Scope of Services The City of Jefferson will hire a 36 CFR 61 qualified consultant to prepare a Historic Context for the City of Jefferson. A. The consultant shall: Prepare a historic context study of the City of Jefferson in accordance with the Secretary of Interior’s Standards for Preservation Planning and the Missouri State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). The historic context must provide the City of Jefferson with a framework for identifying and evaluating the City’s historic resources. The context must be able to be used as a tool aiding in the identification and evaluation of resources by focusing on and explaining what aspects of 2 geography, history, and culture significantly shaped the physical development of Jefferson City. The historic context shall examine land-use patterns and built environment, what property types were important and associated with development patterns, why the developments were important, and what characteristics they need to have to be considered an important representation of their type and context. The project must provide the background necessary to understand why a resource may be significant and must identify and explain in detail patterns, themes, or trends that shaped the City’s development. The historic context must dedicate a chapter of the historic context to be committed to examining how planning practices (exclusionary zoning, racially restrictive covenants, and red- lining practices), have led to racial segregation and other discriminatory impacts on communities of color in Jefferson City. B. The final report shall be written in a manner that is engaging and informative for the public. It shall include: A description of objectives and methodology, a description of each historic context, pictures illustrating contexts, property types, and common architectural characteristics for each historic context, identify properties associated with each historic context, provide recommendations for each historic context, provide a summary of lost resources. Provide overall recommendations and future actions, including suggestions of properties for potential National Register listing, and provide a bibliography and list of resources that were utilized. C. Public Meetings The grant recipient will conduct a minimum of two public meetings in Jefferson City to inform the interested public about the goals and scope of the historic context project. The first meeting will be held as near to the beginning of the project as practical and the second meeting will be conducted after the project when the historic context study and recommendations will be presented. Meetings should be primarily informative, but may also be used to solicit information from knowledgeable members of the public. The documentation required for the public meeting will include a copy of the public meeting notice, the meeting agenda, minutes from the meeting, and the sign-in sheet. Public meeting notices regarding this grant project will include the following acknowledgment: This project is partially funded by a grant from the Missouri Department of Natural Resources, State Historic Preservation Office, and the U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service. Grant awards do not imply an endorsement of contents by the grantor. Federal laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, religion, sex, age, handicap, or ethnicity. For more information, write to the Office of Equal Opportunity, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington D.C. 20240. [This acknowledgement may be in any size type on the notice and in the historic context report.] 3 Qualifications Consultants responding to this RFP must meet 36 CFR 61, (See AttachmentA), minimum professional requirements as listed below: The selected consultant shall possess the following qualifications: • The minimum professional requirements are a graduate degree in history or closely related field or a bachelor’s degree in history or closely related field • Experience preparing historic context studies • At least three years of experience as a professional historian following completion of an undergraduate degree in history or a closely related field • Ability to meet federal and state standards for any deliverables produced • Ability to work independently in a team environment • The ability to organize project records and meet deadlines is necessary • Strong commitment to quality control, attention to detail, communication, and collaboration Requirements for Submitting Proposals All respondents shall address the following, as a minimum, and should conform to the numbering system used below. Submit two (2) copies of your response to this RFP. 1. Name, address, and telephone number of the firm or individual, with contact name(s). 2. Names of personnel who meet 36 CFR 61, professional qualifications. 3. Name of project manager, and names of key personnel assigned to work on the project, their titles, experience, professional licenses, professional affiliations and other qualifications, and years with the firm; total size of firm's staff. 4. Description of the current workload of the project team and impact on key personnel. 5. Identify potential subcontractors, if any. 6. Status as Disadvantaged Business Enterprise of main and any subcontractors, Exhibit 2 7. List of previous clients for work similar to this project conducted over the past five years, with project scope, and contact names, and telephone numbers. 8. A proposed schedule for completion of the work. The City intends to complete the project promptly. The schedule should list the project start date, project components with completion listed in the number of days, project completion date including the total number of days to complete the project. 4 9. An itemized cost for all activities required to complete the survey as specified herein including a final not-to-exceed total cost. Consultant Selection Process The City of Jefferson will hire a professional that meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards for a historian or architectural historian, as outlined in the Code of Federal Regulations, 36 CFR Part 61 to conduct the Historic Context of the City of Jefferson. Selection of a consultant shall be based on the following criteria 1. Project Team The evaluation will consider the consultant’s qualifications, experience, and ability to perform the work • Qualifications of personnel proposed to participate in the project including the experience, education and certifications including availability of personnel who meet 36 CFR 61, professional qualifications • Unique qualifications to perform the work A maximum of 25 points is available for this section 2. Capability of Consultant The ability to produce the required documentation within a timely manner. A maximum of 25 points is available for this section 3. References The evaluation will consider references from current or prior clients. Submit a minimum of three references and their contact information. A maximum of 20 points is available for this section 4. Cost The evaluation will consider all costs required to complete the architectural survey as specified. All costs shall be included and itemized within the proposal response and shall contain a not-to-exceed total cost. A maximum of 30 points is available for this section Questions Questions regarding this Request for Proposal should be directed to the Office of the Purchasing Agent, City of Jefferson, Missouri; telephone 573-634-6325 or lcorrigan@jeffcitymo.org Closing Date All responses to this Request for Proposal RFP No _____ must be received by 3:00 p.m. on ____________________CST. Please label your response in the lower left of the envelope or package “RFP NO. _____ Historic Context of the City of Jefferson” 5 Responses shall be directed to: Office of the Purchasing Agent, 320 East McCarty Street, Room 202 Jefferson City MO 65101. Responses received after the date and time listed above will not be considered. 6 ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS CONTRACTING WITH SMALL AND MINORITY FIRMS, WOMEN’S BUSINESS ENTERPRISE, AND LABOR SURPLUS AREA FIRMS. In accordance with Missouri Executive Order No. 15-06 and federal administrative provisions, all recipients shall make every feasible effort to target the percentage of goods and services procured from certified minority business enterprises (MBE) and women business enterprises (WBE) to 10% and 10% respectively, when utilizing financial assistance funds to purchase supplies, equipment, construction and services related to this financial assistance agreement. 1. The recipient agrees to take all necessary affirmative steps required to assure that small and minority firms and women’s business enterprises are used when possible as sources when procuring supplies, equipment, construction and services related to the financial assistance agreement. The recipient agrees to include information about these requirements in solicitation documents. Affirmative steps shall include: a. Placing qualified small and minority business and women’s business enterprises on solicitation lists; b. Ensuring that small and minority business and women’s business enterprises are solicited whenever they are potential sources; c. Dividing total requirements, when economically feasible, into shall tasks or quantities to permit maximum participation by small and minority business and women’s business enterprises; d. Establishing delivery schedules, where the requirements of work will encourage participation by small and minority business and women’s business enterprises; e. Using the services of the Small Business Administration, the Minority business Development Agency of the U.S. Department of Commerce and the MO Office of Equal Opportunity, and f. Requiring any prime contractor or other sub recipients, if sub agreements are to be allowed, to take the affirmative steps in subparagraphs a. through e. of this sections. 2. For EPA funded financial assistance agreements, the recipient agrees to include disadvantaged business enterprises in the affirmative steps indicated above. 3. For EPA funded financial assistance agreements, the recipient shall utilize EPA form 5700-52A to report to MDNR procurements under the financial assistance agreement. 7 DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS UTILIZATION AGREEMENT A. The bidder agrees to attempt to expend at least 10% of the contract, if awarded, for Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) for purposes of this goal, the term “Disadvantaged Business Enterprise” shall mean a business: 1. Which is at least 51 percent owned by one or more minorities or women, or, in the case of a publicly owned business, at least 51 percent of the stock of which is owned by one or more minorities or women; and 2. Whose management and daily business operations are controlled by one or more such individuals. “Disadvantaged Group Member” or “Disadvantaged” means a person who is a citizen or lawful permanent resident of the United States, and who is: 1. Black (a person having origins in any of the black racial groups of Africa); 2. Hispanic (a person of Spanish or Portuguese culture with origins in Mexico, South or Central America, or the Caribbean Island, regardless of race); 3. Asian American (a person having origins in any of the original peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia, the Indian sub-continent, or the Pacific Islands); 4. American Indians and Alaskan Native (a person having origins in any of the original peoples of North America); 5. Member of other groups, or other individuals, found to be economically and socially disadvantaged by the Small Business Administration under Section 8(a) of the Small Business Act, as amended [15 U.S.C. 637(a)]. 6. A female person who requests to be considered as an DBE, and who “owns” and “controls” a business as defined herein. Disadvantaged Business Enterprises may be employed as contractors, subcontractors, or suppliers. B. The bidder must indicate the Disadvantaged Business Enterprise(s) proposed for utilization as part of this contract as follows: Name and Addresses Nature of Dollar Value of Of DBE Firms Participation Participation ______________________________ _____________________ ______________ ______________________________ _____________________ ______________ ______________________________ _____________________ ______________ Total Bid Amount: ______________________ Total ______________ 8 Percentage of Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Participation: ______% C. The bidder agrees to certify that the disadvantaged business firm(s) engaged to provide materials or services in the completion of this project: (a) is a bona fide Disadvantaged Business Enterprise; and (b) has executed a binding contract to provide specific materials or services for a specific dollar amount. A roster of bona fide Disadvantaged Business Enterprise firms will be furnished by the City of Jefferson. The bidder will provide written notice to the Liaison Officer of the City of Jefferson indicating the Disadvantaged Business Enterprise(s) it intends to use in conjunction with this contract. This written notice is due five days after notification to the lowest bidder. Certification that the Disadvantaged Business Enterprise(s) has executed a binding contract with the bidder for materials or services should be provided to the DBE Coordinator at the time the bidder’s contract is submitted to the DBE Coordinator. D. The undersigned hereby certifies that he or she has read the terms of this agreement and is authorized to bind the bidder to the agreement herein set forth. _____________________________ Name of Authorized Officer Date ________________ _____________________________ Signature of Authorized Officer 9 STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS The recipient must comply with all federal, state and local laws relating to employment, construction, research, environmental compliance, and other activities associated with grants from the MDNR. A. Laws and regulations related to nondiscrimination: 1. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 88-352) which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color or national origin including Limited English Proficiency (LEP); 2. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 found at 42 U.S.C. § 2000(e) et seq. which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, or sex; 3. Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (U.S.C. §§ 1681-1683 and 1685-1686) which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex; 4. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.C. § 794), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability; 5. Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended (42 U.S.C. §§ 621-634), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of age; 6. Drug Abuse Office and Treatment Act of 1972 (P.L. 92-255), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination on the basis of drug abuse; 7. Comprehensive Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Prevention, Treatment and Rehabilitation Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-616), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination on the basis of alcohol abuse or alcoholism; 8. Sections 523 and 527 of the Public Health Service Act of 1912 (42 U.S.C. §§ 290 dd-3 and 290 ee-3), as amended, relating to confidentiality of alcohol and drug abuse patient records; 9. Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq.), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination in the sale, rental or financing of housing; 10. Chapter 213 of the Missouri Revised Statutes which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, age, and disability. 11. The Americans with Disabilities Act (P.L. 101-336), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., relating to nondiscrimination with respect to employment, public services, public accommodations and telecommunications. 12. Any other nondiscrimination provisions in the specific statute(s) and regulations under which application for federal assistance is being made. 13. The requirements of any other nondiscrimination statute(s) and regulations which may apply to the application. 10 B. State and Federal Environmental Laws: 1. The Federal Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7606, as amended, prohibiting award of assistance by way of grant, loan, or contract to noncomplying facilities. 2. The Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1368, as amended, prohibiting award of assistance by way of grant, loan, or contract to noncomplying facilities. 3. The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42 U.S.C. § 4321 et seq., as amended, particularly as it relates to the assessment of the environmental impact of federally assisted projects. 4. The National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, 16 U.S.C. § 470 et seq., as amended, relating to the preservation of historic landmarks. 5. Earthquakes – Seismic Building and Construction Ordinances, §§ 319.200 – 319.207, RSMo (Cum. Supp. 1990), relating to the adoption of seismic design and construction ordinances by certain cities, towns, villages, and counties. 6. The Missouri Clean Water Law, Sections 644.006 to 644.141, RSMo. 7. The Missouri Hazardous Waste Management Law, Section, 260.350 to 260.430 RSMo. 8. The Missouri Solid Waste Management Law, Sections 260.200 to 260.245, RSMo. 9. The Missouri Air Conservation Law, Sections 643.101 to 643.190, RSMo. C. Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, 42 U.S.C. §§ 4601 and 4651 et seq., relating to acquisition of interest in real property or any displacement of persons, businesses, or farm operations. D. The Hatch Act, 5 U.S.C. § 1501 et seq., as amended, relating to certain political activities of certain State and local employees. E. Archaeological and Historic Preservation Act of 1974 (Public Law 93-291) relating to potential loss or destruction of significant scientific, historical, or archaeological data in connection with federally assisted activities. F. The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968 (16 U.S.C. § 1271 et seq.) related to protecting components of potential components of the national wild and scenic rivers system. G. The flood insurance purchase requirements of § 102(a) of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (Public Law 93-234) which requires recipients in a special flood hazard area to participate in the program and to purchase flood insurance if the total cost of insurable construction and acquisition is $10,00 or more. H. The Privacy Act of 1974, P.L. 93-579, as amended prohibiting the maintenance of information about any individual in a manner which would violate the provisions of the Act. 11 I. Public Law 93-348 regarding the protection of human subjects involved in research, development and related activities supported by this award of assistance. J. The Laboratory Animal Welfare Act of 1966 (P.L. 89-544), 7 U.S.C. § 2131 et seq., pertaining to the care, handling, and treatment of warm blooded animals held for research, teaching or other activities supported by this award of assistance. K. The following additional requirements apply to projects that involve constructions: 1. The Davis-Bacon Act, as amended, 40 U.S.C. § 276a et seq., respecting wage rates for federally assisted construction contracts in excess of $2,000. 2. The Copeland (Anti-Kickback) Act, 18 U.S.C. § 874, 40 U.S.C. § 276c. 3. The Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act, 40 U.S.C. § 327 et seq. 4. Convict labor shall not be used on construction projects unless by convicts who are on work release, parole, or probation. 5. The Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act (42 U.S.C. § 4801 et seq.) which prohibits the use of lead paint in construction or rehabilitation of residence structures. ATTACHMENT A: SCOPE, PURPOSE AND DESCRIPTION OF GRANT ACTIVITIES City of Jefferson, Missouri Historic Context of Jefferson City Project No. 29-21-10029-011 Starting Date: Sept. 1, 2021 Ending Date: August 31, 2022 I. SCOPE AND PURPOSE: The City of Jefferson will hire a 36 CFR 61 , Appendix A, qualified historian or architectural historian (herein referred to as “consultant”) to develop a historic context of Jefferson City. II. ACTIVITIES AND FUNCTIONS: A. Consultant Selection Process The City of Jefferson shall contract with a 36 CFR Part 61, Appendix A, qualified historian or architectural historian (herein referred to as Consultant) to assist city staff and the Historic Preservation Commission in creating a histo ric c ontext. The sub-recipient shall require the language of the certification and terms applicable to financial assistance awards to be included in sub-award document at all tiers, and sub-recipients shall certify and disclose accordingly, pursuant to 2 CFR 200.331. The Request for Proposals (RFP ) shall include a copy of Attachment A: Scope, Purpose and Description of Grant Activities and the Milestone Schedule from the Grant Agreement with financial information removed. All contractual deadlines established with the Consultant shall not conflict with milestone deadlines set in the grant agreement. City staff will serve as the primary point of contact for this project and will be expected to ensure milestones are submitted to the HPF Grant Manager or their designee on a timely basis. A draft RFP will be sent to the HPF Grant Manager or their designee for approval prior to initiating the bid process . Documentation of the Consultant selection process and a draft of the contract shall be submitted to the HPF Grant Manger or their designee for approval before it is signed. B. The historic context shall be developed with the intent to guide the future of architectural/historic survey work and National Register of Historic Places nominations within the City of Jefferson. The historic context shall be prepared according to the National Park Service’s National Register Bulletin, “How to Apply the National Register Criteria for Evaluation,” a historic context is “an organizing structure for interpreting history that groups information about historic properties that share a common theme, common geographic area, and a common time period. The development of historic contexts is a foundation for decisions about the planning, identification, evaluation, registration and treatment of historic properties based upon comparative historical significance.” The hired C onsultant acting on behalf of the c ity sha ll create a Historic Context for Jefferson City . The historic context shall be prepared to serve as a tool aiding in the identification and evaluation of resources within Jefferson City by focusing on and explaining what aspects of geography, history, and culture significantly shaped the physical development of Jefferson City. The historic context shall examine land use patterns and built environment over time, what property types were important and associated development patterns, why the developments were Grant Agreement Scope, Purpose and Description City of Jefferson , Cole County, Missouri Page 2 important, and what characteristics they need to have to be considered an important representation of their type and context. The historic context shall provide the background necessary to understand why a resource may be significant and will identify and explain in detail patterns, themes or trends that shaped the City’s development. Special consideration, potentially a chapter in the context, shall be given to examine the City of Jefferson’s past planning practices, specifically zoning , that contributed to any discriminatory practices that would have affected an individual based on their race or ethnicity. This examination will likely include examining any exclusionary zoning, racially restrictive covenants, and redlining practices that took place in Jefferson City. The City of Jefferson has identified this as an important aspect of the historic context so they can understand how past decision on zoning and land use patterns have contributed to the market-driven displacement and exclusionary neighborhood patterns with significant and deleterious consequences for individuals based on their race or ethnicity. The process and final product shall include but is not be limited to: 1. A minimum of one initial consultation meeting between c ity staff, the Historic Preservation Commission and the C onsultant to discuss any existing historic context documents , the process envisioned by the c ity, and what the c ity and Commission’s expectations are for the historic context. 2. A minimum of two public meetings to solicit citizen input. A minimum of one meeting shall be at the start of the process to explain the historic context to the community. A minimum of one meeting at the end of the process shall be held to present the context. 3. Research and write a historic context the historic context must be prepared in accordance with: Wyatt, Barbara, “The Components of a Historic Context: A National Register White Paper,” April 9, 2009 https://dahp.wa.gov/sites/default/files/White_paper_on_historic_context_4-09.pdf 4. The c ity shall post notices of public meetings on their website and at City Hall and provide opportunities for citizen comment. 5. Submit at least two drafts of the historic context to the HPF Grant Manager or their designee for review and approval as outlined in the Milestone/Payment Schedule; 6. Submit the completed historic context to the HPF Grant Manager or their designee in both hard and electronic copy. The City shall also make the final historic context available to the public for download from the City of Jefferson website. C. Grant products will include: 1. A draft Request for Proposal (RFP ) to hire the consultant who will develop the historic context. Submitted prior to the initiation of the bid process. 2. Email documentation of the consultant selection process and a draft of the consultant contract prior to signature. This documentation includes: a. Indication of who the RFP was sent to and when b. Copies of all responses received (proposals, resumes, and responses of no bid) c. Score sheets/an explanation for why the selected consultant was chosen d. The unsigned draft consultant contract noted above Grant Agreement Scope, Purpose and Description City of Jefferson , Cole County, Missouri Page 3 3. Submit a copy of the signed consultant contract. 4. Copies of all notices of public meeting, meeting or workshop minutes/notes and s ign -in sheets. 5. An e -mail including the URL for the historic context once it has been posted on the City’s website. D. Public Meetings The grant recipient will conduct a minimum of two public meetings in Jefferson City to inform owners of properties within the survey area and the interested public about the goals and scope of the survey project. The first meeting will be held as near to the beginning of the survey as practical and the second meeting will be conducted at the conclusion of the project, when survey results and recommendations will be presented. Meetings should be primarily informative in nature, but may also be used to solicit information from knowledgeable members of the public. The documentation required for the public meeting will include a copy of the public meeting notice, the agenda, and the sign-in sheet or record of attendance. III. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: A. The procedures and requirements contained herein are subject to applicable laws and regulations, and any changes made to these laws and regulations, subsequent to the execution of this agreement. In the event that these procedures and requirements conflict with applicable federal laws, regulations and policies, the following order of precedence will prevail: 1. Federal law 2. Code of Federal Regulations 3. Terms and conditions of grant award 4. Historic Preservation Fund Grant Manual The provisions included herein shall also be applied by the State to subgrantees and contractors performing work under this program. B. It is agreed that if the project should fall one (1) month behind the milestones, the Missouri Department of Natural Resources has the right unilaterally to terminate or reduce the dollar amount of this agreement. In addition, if the Department determines that full termination is warranted, the Department shall be sole authority in determining the amount of compensation owed. C. All work related to this project will either be supervised or completed by personnel who meet 36 CFR 61, Appendix A, professional qualifications for historian or architectural historian. D. The Jefferson City Historic Preservation Commission will have an opportunity to review and comment on milestone products before they are submitted to the HPF Grant Manager or their designee if they so choose. Any Commission comments will be submitted with the corresponding milestone to the HPF Grant Manager or their designee . Grant Agreement Scope, Purpose and Description City of Jefferson , Cole County, Missouri Page 4 E. All grant project funded publications, books, brochures and all public meeting notices regarding this grant project shall include the following acknowledgement: This material was produced with assistance from the Historic Preservation Fund, administered by the National Park Service, Department of the Interior, of the U.S. Government and Missouri Department of Natural Resources, State Historic Preservation Office. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of the Interior or the Department of Natural Resources, State Historic Preservation Office, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation. [This acknowledgement may be in any size type on the notice] Project work will be completed and payments made according to the milestone/payment schedule and project budget that follows. Grant Agreement Scope, Purpose and Description City of Jefferson , Cole County, Missouri Page 5 MILESTONE/PAYMENT SCHEDULE City of Jefferson, Missouri Historic Context of Jefferson City Project No. 29-21-10029-011 Starting Date: Sept. 1, 2021 Ending Date: August 31, 2022 Milestone Product Date Due Federal Share Non-Federal Share #1 Submit a draft RFP to the HPF Grant Manager or their designee before the bid process is initiated. 10/01/2021 $ $ #2 Submit documentation of the consultant selection process and a draft of the consultant contract prior to signature submitted to the HPF Grant Manager or their designee for review and approval. 12/01/2021 $ $ #3 Submit a copy of signed consultant contract to the HPF Grant Manager or their designee . 01/01/2022 $ $ #4 Submit the agenda, minutes, and sign-in sheets from the first meeting between the City, Historic Preservation Commission , and consultant to the HPF Grant Manager or their designee. 01/15/2022 $ $ #5 Submit to HPF Grant Manager or their designee sign -in sheet and minutes from first public meeting. 01/31/2022 $ $ #6 Submit to HPF Grant Manager or their designee the first draft of historic context for review and approval. 03/15/2022 $ $ # Submit second draft of the historic context to the HPF Grant Manager or their designee for review and approval, complete with all text, photography and graphic design. 05/15/2022 Estimated 50% of expenses Estimated 50% of expenses # Submit final copy of the report and sign -in sheet and minutes from final public meeting. 07/15/2022 $ $ #9 Submit required copies of final completed historic context to HPF Grant Manager or their designee . Submit final project report and fiscal data 07/31/2022 $ $ #10 Submission of final project report and fiscal data. 08/30/2022 Estimated remaining expenses Estimated remaining expenses TOTALS: CITY OF JEFFERSON CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the date last executed by a party as indicated below, by and between the City of Jefferson, a municipal corporation of the State of Missouri, hereinafter referred to as "City", and Owen & Eastlake, Ltd., hereinafter referred to as "Contractor". WITNESSETH: THAT WHEREAS, the City desires to engage the Contractor to render certain services fora historic context study of the City, hereinafter described in Exhibit A. WHEREAS, Contractor has made certain representations and statements to the City with respect to the provision of such services and the City has accepted said proposal to enter into a contract with the Contractor for the performance of services by the Contractor. NOW THEREFORE, for the considerations herein expressed, it is agreed by and between the City and the Contractor as follows: 1. Scope of Services. Contractor agrees to provide all supervision, labor, tools, equipment, materials and supplies for historical and/or architectural services, as set forth in Exhibit A. In the event of a conflict between this agreement and any attached exhibits, the provisions of this agreement shall govern and prevail, 2. Payment. The City hereby agrees to pay Contractor for the work done pursuant to this contract according to the payment schedule set forth in the contract documents upon acceptance of said work by an Agent of the City of Jefferson, and in accordance with the rates and/or amounts stated in the bid of Contractor dated November 22, 2021, which are by reference made a part hereof. No partial payment to Contractor shall operate as approval or acceptance of work done or materials furnished hereunder. No change in compensation shall be made unless there is a substantial and significant difference between the work originally contemplated by this agreement and the work actually required. The total amount for services rendered under this contract shall not exceed Forty -Two Thousand Five Hundred Dollars and Zero Cents ($42,500.00). 3. Term. This contract shall commence on the date last executed by a party as indicated below. The Contractor shall provide such historical and/or architectural services as set forth in Exhibit A, by July 15, 2022. 4. Additional Services. The City may add to Contractor services or delete therefrom activities of a similar nature to those set forth in Exhibit A, provided that the total cost of such work does not exceed the total cost allowance as specified in paragraph 2 hereof. The Contractor shall undertake such changed activities only upon the direction of the City. All such directives and changes shall be in written form and approved by the City and shall be accepted and countersigned by the Contractor or its agreed representatives. 5. ,Personnel to be Provided. The Contractor represents that Contractor has or will secure at its expense all personnel required to perform the services called for under this contract by the Contractor. Such personnel shall not be employees of or have any contractual relationship with the City except as employees of the Contractor. All of the services required hereunder will be performed by the Contractor or under the Contractor's direct supervision and all 2 personnel engaged in the work shall be fully qualified and shall be authorized under state and local Iaw to perform such services. None ofthe work or services covered by this contract shall be subcontracted except as provided in Exhibit A without the written approval ofthe City. 6. Contractor's Responsibility for Subcontractors. It is further agreed that Contractor shall be as fully responsible to the City for the acts and omissions of its subcontractors, and of persons either directly or indirectly employed by them, as Contractor is for the acts and omissions of persons it directly employs. Contractor shall cause appropriate provision; to be inserted in all subcontracts relating to this work, to bind all subcontractors to Contractor by all the terms herein set forth, insofar as applicable to the work of subcontractors and to give Contractor the same power regarding termination of any subcontract as the City may exercise over Contractor under any provisions of this contract. Nothing contained in this contract shall create any contractual relations between any subcontractor and the City or between any subcontractors. 7. Independent Contractor. The Contractor is an independent contractor and nothing herein shall constitute or designate the Contractor or any of its employees as agents or employees of the City. 8. Benefits not Available. The Contractor shall not be entitled to any of the benefits established for the employees of the City and shall not be covered by the Workmen's Compensation Program of the City, 9. Nondiscrimination. The Contractor agrees in the performance of the contract not to discriminate on the grounds or because of race, creed, color, national origin or ancestry, sex, religion, handicap, age or political affiliation, against any employee of Contractor or applicant for employment and shall include a similar provision in all subcontracts let or awarded hereunder. 10. Illegal Immigration. Prior to commencement of the work: a. Contractor shall, by sworn affidavit and provision of documentation, affirm its enrollment and participation in a federal work authorization program with respect to the employees working in connection with the contracted services. b. Contractor shall sign an affidavit affirming that it does not knowingly employ any person who is an unauthorized alien in connection with the contracted services. c. If Contractor is a sole proprietorship, partnership, or limited partnership, Contractor shall provide proof of citizenship or lawful presence of the owner. 11. Notice to Proceed. The services of the Contractor shall commence upon execution of this Agreement, and shall be undertaken and completed in accordance with the schedule contained in Exhibit A. 12. Termination. lf, through any cause, the Contractor shall fail to fulfill in timely and proper mariner its obligations under this contract, or if the Contractor shall violate any of the covenants, agreements, or stipulations of this contract, the City shall thereupon have the right to terminate this contract by giving written notice to the Contractor of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof, at least five (5) days before the effective day of such termination. The City reserves the right to terminate this contract for convenience 3 by giving at least fourteen (14) days prior written notice to Contractor, without prejudice to any other rights or remedies of the City, provide Contractor shall be entitled to payment for all work completed by Contractor through the date of termination. The Contractor may without cause terminate this contract upon 30 days prior written notice. In either such event all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs, and reports or other materials prepared by the Contractor under this contract shall, at the option of the City, become its property, and the compensation for any satisfactory work completed on such documents and other materials shall be determined. Notwithstanding the above, the Contractor shall not be relieved of liability to the City for damages sustained by the City by virtue of any such breach of contract by the Contractor. 13. Waiver of Breach. Failure to insist upon strict compliance with any of the terms covenants or conditions herein shall not be deemed a waiver of any such terms, covenants or conditions, nor shall any failure at one or more times be deemed a waiver or relinquishment at any other time or times by any right under the terms, covenants or conditions herein. 14. Authorship and Enforcement. Parties agree that the production of this document was the joint effort of both parties and that the contract should not be construed as having been drafted by either party. In the event that the City successfully enforces the terms of this contract through litigation, the City shall be entitled to receive, in addition to any other relief, its reasonable attorney's fees, expenses and costs. 15. Severability. if any section, subsection, sentence, or clause of this contract shall be adjudged illegal, invalid, or unenforceable, such illegality, invalidity, or unenforceability shall not affect the legality, validity, or enforceability of the contract as a whole, or of any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or attachment not so adjudged. 16. Assinnment. The Contractor shall not assign any interest in this contract, and shall not transfer any interest in the same (whether by assignment or novation), without prior written consent of the City thereto. Any such assignment is expressly subject to all rights and remedies of the City under this agreement, including the right to change or delete activities from the contract or to terminate the same as provided herein, and no such assignment shall require the City to give any notice to any such assignee of any actions which the City may take under this agreement, though City will attempt to so notify any such assignee. 17. Existing Data. All information, data and reports as are existing, available and necessary for the carrying out of the work, shall be furnished to the Contractor without charge by the City, and the City shall cooperate with the Contractor in every reasonable way in carrying out the scope of services. The Contractor shall not be liable for the accuracy of the information furnished by the city. 18. Confidentiality. Any reports, data or similar information given to or prepared or assembled by the Contractor under this contract which the City requests to be kept as confidential shall not be made available to any individual or organization by the Contractor without prior written approval of the City. 19. Indemnity. To the fullest extent permitted by law, the Contractor will defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, 4 its elected and appointed officials, employees, and agents from and against any and all claims, damages, losses, and expenses including attorneys' fees arising out of or resulting from the performance of the work, provided that any such claim, damage, loss or expense (1) is attributable to bodily injury, sickness, disease, or death, or to injury to or destruction of tangible property (other than the work itseIf) including the loss of use resulting therefrom and (2) is caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission of contractor, any subcontractor, anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable, regardless of whether or not it is caused in part by a party indemnified hereunder. Such obligation shall not be construed to negate, abridge, or otherwise reduce any other right or obligation of indemnity which would otherwise exist as to any party or person described in this paragraph. 20. Insurance. Contractor shalt provide, at its sole expense, and maintain during the term of this agreement commercial general liability insurance with a reputable, qualified, and financially sound company licensed to do business in the State of Missouri, and unless otherwise approved by the City, with a rating by Best of not less than "A," that shall protect the Contractor, the City, and the City's officials, officers, and employees from claims which may arise from operations under this agreement, whether such operations are by the Contractor, its officers, directors, employees and agents, or any subcontractors of Contractor. This liability insurance shall include, but shall not be limited to, protection a tt. inst claims arising from bodily and personal injury and damage to property, resulting from all Contractor operations, products, services or use of automobiles, or construction equipment at a limit of $500,000 Each Occurrence, $3,000,000 Annual Aggregate; provided that nothing herein shall be deemed a waiver of the City's sovereign immunity. An endorsement shall be provided which states that the City is named as an additional insured and stating that the policy shall not be cancelled or materially modified so as to be out of compliance with the requirements of this section, or not renewed without 30 days advance written notice of such event being given to the City. 21. Documents. Reproducible copies of tracings and maps prepared or obtained under the terms of this contract shall be delivered upon request to and become the property of the City upon termination or completion of work. Copies of basic survey notes and sketches, charts, computations and other data prepared or obtained under this contract shall be made available, upon request, to the City without restrictions or limitations on their use. When such copies are requested, the City agrees to pay the Contractor its costs of copying and delivering same. 22. Rooks and Records. The Contractor and all subcontractors shall maintain all books, documents, papers, accounting records and other evidence pertaining to costs incurred in connection with this contract, and shall make such materials available at their respective offices at all reasonable times during the contract and for a period of three (3) years following completion of the contract. 23. Nonsvlicitatinn. The Contractor warrants that they have not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Contractor, to solicit or secure this contract, and that they have not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Contractor, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts, or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this contract. For breach or violation of this warranty, the City shall have the right to annul this contract without liability, or, in its discretion, to deduct from the contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts, or contingent fee. 5 24. Delays. That the Contractor shall not be liable for delays resulting from causes beyond the reasonable control of the Contractor; that the Contractor has made no warranties, expressed or implied, which are not expressly set forth in this contract; and that under no circumstances will the Contractor be liable for indirect or consequential damages. 25. Amendments. This contract may not be modified, changed or altered by any oral promise or statement by whosoever made; nor shall any modification of it be binding upon the City until such written modification shall have been approved in writing by an authorized officer of the City. Contractor acknowledges that the City may not be responsible for paying for changes or modifications that were not propel ly authorized. 26. Governing Law. The contract shall be governed by the laws of the State of Missouri. The courts of the State of Missouri shall have jurisdiction over any dispute which arises under this contract, and each of the parties shall submit and hereby consents to such courts exercise of jurisdiction. In any successful action by the City to enforce this contract, the City shall be entitled to recover its attorney's fees and expenses incurred in such action. 27. Federal Funds to be Used. The City of Jefferson is a recipient of federal grant funds. Therefore, the grant requirements in Exhibit 8 shall be fully considered in preparing responses and performing work under any resulting award. 28. Notices. All notices required or permitted hereinunder and required to be in writing may be given by first class mail addressed to the following addresses. The date and delivery of any notice shall be the date falling on the second full day after the day of its mailing. If to the City; City of Jefferson Department of Law 320 East McCarty Street Jefferson City, Missouri, 65101 if to the Contractor; Owen & Eastlake, Ltd. Attn: Rory Krupp 1356 Hamlet Street Columbus, OH 43201 [Signatures to Follow on Next Page] 6 CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI Carrie Tergin, Mayor ATTEST: 44tfiefeatait City lark APPROVED AS TO FORM: OWEN & EASTLAI£E, LTD. Title: .0 , Date: ATTEST: Title: Exhibit A 3B. SCOPE OF WORK — HISTORIC CONTEXT STUDY A. General lnformation The City seeks to contract with a 36 CFR 61 qualified consultant to prepare a historic context for Jefferson City, MO. B. Consultant Requirements l . The consultant shall prepare a historic context study of Jefferson City, MO in accordance with the Secretary of Interior's Standards for Preservation Planning and the Missouri State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). The historic context must provide the City of Jefferson with a framework for identifying and evaluating the City's historic resources. The context M1151 be able to be used as a tool aiding in the identification and evaluation of resources by focusing on and explaining what aspects of geography, history, and culture significantly shaped the physical development of Jefferson City. The historic context shall examine land -use patterns and built environment, what property types were important and associated with development patterns, why the developments were important, and what characteristics they need to have to be considered an important representation of their type and context. The project must provide the background necessary to understand why a resource may be significant and must identify and explain in detail patterns, themes, or trends that shaped the City's development. The historic context must dedicate a chapter of the historic context to be committed to examining how planning practices (exclusionary zoning, racially restrictive covenants, and redlining practices), have led to racial segregation and other discriminatory impacts on communities of color in Jefferson City. 2. The consultant shall prepare a written report in a manner that is engaging and informative for the public. It shall include: A description of objective and methodology, a description of each historic context, pictures illustrating contexts, property types, and common architectural characteristics for each historic context, identify properties associated with each historic context, provide recommendations for each historic context, provide a summary of lost resources. Provide overall recommendation and future actions, including suggestions of properties for potential National Register listing, and provide a bibliography and list of resources that were utilized. 13 3. Public Meetings The consultant will conduct a minimum of two public meetings in Jefferson City to inform the interested public about the goals and scope of the historic context project. The first meeting will be held as near to the beginning of the survey as practical and the second meeting will be conducted after the project when the historic context study and recommendations will be presented. Meetings should be primarily informative, but may also be used to solicit information front knowledgeable members of the public. The documentation required for the public meeting will include a copy of the public meeting notice, the meeting agenda, minutes from the meeting, and the sign -in sheet. Public meeting notices regarding this grant project will include the following acknowledgement: This project is partially funded by a grant from the Missouri Department of Natural Resources, State Historic Preservation Office and the U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service. Grant awards do not imply an endorsement of contents by the grantor. Federal laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, religion, seer, age, handicap, or ethnicity. For more information, write to the Office of Equal Opportunity, U.S Department of the Interior, Washington D.C. 20240. [This acknowledgement may be in any size type on the notice and in the survey report.] D. Qualifications Consultants responding to this RFP must meet 36 CFR 61, Appendix A, minimum professional requirements and possess the following qualifications: • Possess a graduate degree in history or closely related field or a bachelor's degree in history or closely related field; • Demonstrate experience in preparing historic context studies; • Have at least three years of experience as a professional historian following completion of an undergraduate degree in history or closely related field; • Possess the ability to meet federal and state standards for any deliverable produced; • Possess the ability to work independently in a team environment; • Possess the ability to organize project records and meet deadlines; and • Possess a strong commitment to quality control, attention to detail, communication, and collaboration. 14 ATTACIIMEN 1' A — COST FORM Costs Related to the Historic East Side Surve. itemized Expenditure Tatal C Historic East• Sttyey ; ::. ; r: ITEM 2 Costs Related to the Historic West Alain, Lower Jet%rsoA Waterworks Corn llexx Survey_ '$i: Itemized Expenditure ?[ all ig •Total Cdd't -- Historic East, S u ry eL .. r� ITEM 3 Costs Related to the Historic Context Stud Itemized Expenditure a ,Lost,, ; Labor r? 75.00 39,000 Travel $2,500 Editorial services 51,000 Total Cost --Historic East Survey .: * - • . ..- 542,500 EXHIBIT B FEDERAL TERMS Byrd Anti -Lobbying Amendment (31 U.S.C. 1352) Each contractor certifies to the tier above by completing the Certification Regarding Lobbying form, that it will not and has not used Federal appropriated funds to pay any person or organization for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of an agency, a member of Congress, officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a member of Congress in connection with obtaining any Federal contract, grant or any other award covered by 31 U.S.C. 1352. Each tier must also disclose any lobbying with non -Federal funds that takes place in connection with obtaining any Federal award. Debarment and Suspension (Executive Orders 12549 and 12689) A contract award will not be made to parties listed on the government wide exclusions in the System for Award Management (SAM), in accordance with the 0M13 guidelines, 2 CFR 180. SAM exclusions contain the names of parties debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded by agencies as well as parties declared ineligible under statutory or regulatory authority other than Executive Order 12549. Procurement of Recovered Materials The contractor must comply with section 6002 of the Solid Waste Disposal Acts as amended by the Resources Conservation and Recovery Act. The requirements of this section include procuring only items designated in guidelines of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) at 40 CFR part 247 that contain the highest percentage of recovered materials practicable, consistent with maintaining a satisfactory level of competition, where the purchase price of the item exceeds $10,000 or the value of the quantity acquired during the preceding fiscal year exceeded $10,000; procuring solid waste management services in a manner that maximizes energy and resource recovery; and establishing an affirmative procurement program for procurement of recovered materials identified in the EPA guidelines. Termination 1. Termination for Cause. The City may terminate this agreement, in whole or in part, at any time before the date of completion whenever it is determined that the contractor has failed to comply with the terms and conditions of the agreement. The City shall promptly notify the contractor in writing of such a determination and the reasons for the termination, together with the effective date. The City reserves the right to withhold all or a portion of funds if the contractor violates any term or condition of this agreement. Termination for cause may be considered for evaluating future agreements. The contractor may object to terminations with cause and may provide information and documentation challenging the termination. 2. Termination for Convenience. Both the City and the contractor may terminate the agreement, in whole or in part, when both parties agree that the continuation of the project would not produce beneficial results commensurate with the further expenditure of funds. 3. The City reserves the right to terminate the contract at any time, for the convenience of the City, without penalty or recourse, by giving written notice to the contractor at least thirty (30) calendar days prior to the effective date of such termination. The contractor shall be entitled 3. Public Meetings The consultant will conduct a minimum of two public meetings in Jefferson City to inform the interested public about the goals and scope of the historic context project. The first meeting will be held as near to the beginning of the survey as practical and the second meeting will be conducted after the project when the historic context study and recommendations will be presented. Meetings should be primarily informative, but may also be used to solicit information from knowledgeable members of the public. The documentation required for the public meeting will include a copy of the public meeting notice, the meeting agenda, minutes from the meeting, and the sign -in sheet. Public meeting notices regarding this grant project will include the following acknowledgement: This project is partially funded by a grant from the Missouri Department of Natural Resources, State Historic Preservation Office and the U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service. Grant awards do not imply an endorsement of contents by the grantor. Federal laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, religion, sex, age, handicap, or ethnicity. For more information, write to the Office of Equal Opportunity, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington D.0 20240. [This acknowledgement may be in any size type on the notice and in the survey report.] D. Qualifications Consultants responding to this RFP must meet 36 CFR 61, Appendix A, minimum professional requirements and possess the following qualifications: • Possess a graduate degree in history or closely related field or a bachelor's degree in history or closely related field; • Demonstrate experience in preparing historic context studies; • Have at least three years of experience as a professional historian following completion of an undergraduate degree in history or closely related field; • Possess the ability to meet federal and state standards for any deliverable produced; • Possess the ability to work independently in a team environment; • Possess the ability to organize project records and meet deadlines; and • Possess a strong commitment to quality control, attention to detail, communication, and collaboration. 14 to receive compensation for services and/or supplies delivered to and accepted by the City pursuant to the contract prior to the effective date of termination. Owen & Eastlake Ltd. 1356 Hamlet Street Columbus, Ohio 43201 November 22, 2021 Leigh Ann Corrigan Office of the Purchasing Agent 320 E. McCarty St. Jefferson City, Missouri 65101 Dear Ms. Corrigan: Owen & Eastlake is pleased to submit our proposal for the City of Jefferson Historic context. We are a historic preservation firm located in Columbus, Ohio, that specializes in history and architectural history. We have written extensive historic contexts for our National Register nominations and Multiple Property documents. Our historic district nomination are often for under-served and under- represented communities. As such we are familiar with development patterns associated with home loan redlining, restrictive covenants and exclusionary zoning practices. Our civil rights Multiple Property Document included property types and registration guidelines to aid evaluation and future nominations. The MPD also placed the integrity of extant resources in context by listing lost historic resources. Our MPD is currently being used as a basis for a civil rights trail in Cleveland while Heritage Ohio is making statewide civil rights trail. We are also familiar with historic and post-World War II housing, development patterns and themes to be able to fully describe and explain the built environment. Owen & Eastlake is also experienced in leading public meetings for surveys. We will produce the historic context with the City Jefferson’s recent historic preservation planning efforts in mind. Should you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me at rkrupp@oweneastlake.com or 614-439-9068. Sincerely, Rory Krupp Principal Executive Summary Jefferson City, Missouri, received a Historic Preservation Fund grant from the National Park Service, Department of the Interior, and the Missouri Department of Natural Resources, State Historic Preservation Office. Owen & Eastlake herein submits a proposal for a historic context in Jefferson City, Missouri. The historic context will provide planners and citizens with a means to identify and evaluate historic properties in Jefferson City. The historic context will examine land use patterns, historic zoning, planning, and exclusionary practices to present a complete history of Jefferson City’s built environment. A chapter will be dedicated to the processes that allowed racial segregation. The historic context will also be accessible and usable to the general public. The report will include proposed National Register nominations for sites and districts. Firm Qualifications Owen & Eastlake Ltd. was founded in August 2012 in Columbus, Ohio, by principal Rory Krupp. Owen & Eastlake specializes in history and architectural history. The firm prepares National Register documentation for municipalities, community groups, state preservation offices, and local historical societies. The firm also conducts reconnaissance and intensive architectural surveys and Section 106 compliance activities. Owen & Eastlake is experienced in identifying National Register sites and districts. We have prepared a statewide National Register Multiple Property Document that identified potential National Register sites and formulated new registration guidelines and site types for use in evaluating future sites. The firm has also prepared successful National Register nominations for both historic districts and individual properties. All members of the Owen & Eastlake team meet the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for history and architectural history. Related Project Experience Twentieth-Century African American Civil Rights in Ohio, 1900–1970. National Register Multiple Property Document Form, Ohio statewide context, 2019 The Twentieth-Century African American Civil Rights in Ohio National Register Multiple Property Documentation form examines four themes in Ohio civil rights history: public accommodations, employment, education, and police brutality. Owen & Eastlake conducted field work and interviews to locate sites within these themes. National and local civil rights organizations archives, African American newspapers, the Negro Motorist Green Book, and civil rights narratives were examined in both large urban areas and rural Ohio. Close attention was paid to intra-state responses and responses over time to ascertain differences in how different communities reacted to civil rights violations and subsequent actions. Special emphasis was placed on recent movements such as Black Power and Black Economic Empowerment. Owen & Eastlake conducted two community outreach meetings in Columbus and Cincinnati. The team also visited smaller towns throughout Ohio and met with community members to hear their civil rights stories and visit the associated sites. We visited approximately 90 sites to evaluate historic integrity and establish registration guidelines. The MPDF was written for the Ohio Historic State Preservation Office. It was funded by the National Park Service, Department of the Interior, African American Civil Rights Grants program. The project was conducted from October 2017 to December 2018. The MPDF unanimously passed its review by the Ohio State Historic Site Preservation Advisory Board on December 7, 2018. The MPDF was listed in the National Register of Historic Places in June 2019. Dennison-McMillen Architectural Survey and Local Historic District Nomination, Columbus, Ohio, 2019 Owen & Eastlake conducted a combination reconnaissance and intensive architectural survey for the Dennison-McMillen Historic District Steering Committee. A Certified Local Government grant partially funded an architectural survey that recorded 250 resources on Ohio Historic Inventory forms. Inventoried resources included historic homes, churches, schools, and infill apartments ranging in construction date from 1875 to 1984, giving a full range of the area’s properties. Owen & Eastlake also conducted three community meetings. The survey report was researched and written according to Guidelines for Conducting History/Architecture Surveys in Ohio. Depot District and Old Town Neighborhood Reconnaissance Survey, City of Kirksville, Missouri, 2020 Owen & Eastlake conducted a reconnaissance architectural survey of 294 historic resources in Kirksville, Missouri in 2021. A mix of commercial buildings and residential homes the historic resources ranged from the 1870s to early 2000s. A survey report and 294 Missouri architectural inventory forms were produced. Owen & Eastlake conducted two public meetings in Kirksville’s City Hall. The survey also resulted in a proposed National Register district with a transportation theme. Memorial Park and Old Town East Neighborhoods Reconnaissance Survey, Kirksville, Missouri, 2021 In 2021, Owen & Eastlake survey 301 properties for the City of Kirksville. The survey area was largely residential properties ranging from the 1870’s to the modern day. The survey area also included a historic park that was a Civil War battle site. The survey resulted in 301 Missouri architectural survey forms and one proposed National Register historic district. Project Approach Owen & Eastlake conducts original research for its historic contexts using primary documents and secondary sources. We do not boilerplate previous research. Owen & Eastlake maintains a Friends of the Library membership at the Ohio State University, a major research institution; a JSTOR membership for access to the latest scholarly articles; and memberships in newspaper and genealogical databases. All these resources will be used as appropriate for this project’s historic research. Local libraries and historical societies will be used for local research, including consultation with local historians and the interested public as needed. Historic context Methodology Owen & Eastlake will begin research to identify themes and land use patterns to examine Jefferson City’s built environment. Owen & Eastlake will utilize previous planning documents, newspapers, archival sources and secondary documents to identify themes. Using the identified themes we will identify building types and integrity to allow planners and citizens to identify and evaluate historic resources. Public Notification Owen & Eastlake will conduct an initial public meeting to elicit material and inform the public about the historic context’s goals and outcomes. Project Staff The project will be managed from the Columbus, Ohio office. The firm’s principal, Rory Krupp, will manage the project both in the field and the office. He will also conduct the preliminary archival research in Jefferson City, Missouri, and produce the documentation for the public meeting. Krupp will collaborate with Roy Hampton to write the research design. Krupp and Hampton will write the historic context, and Hampton will write the architectural descriptions and key neighborhood architectural descriptions. The team will share the photography and mapping work. Summary of Project Staff Experience The project staff has completed six successful individual National Register nominations, including one that was listed with national significance. Owen & Eastlake has also conducted the research and preparation of a nationally significant mid-century modern National Register historic district. Owen & Eastlake has completed five large survey projects, including a state-wide Multiple Property Document Form, Twentieth-Century African American Civil Rights in Ohio, 1900– 1970: Evaluating and Nominating Historic Properties. Owen & Eastlake completed two reconnaissance architectural surveys in Kirksville, Missouri funded through a NPS Historic Preservation Fund grant. Additional survey projects include the Asheville African American Heritage Survey and the Dennison-McMillen Architectural Reconnaissance Survey. All survey projects included historic contexts. As key personnel for another firm, Krupp and Hampton worked together on the Cleveland Innerbelt Architectural Survey and a survey of the Naval Station Great Lakes in Chicago. They also conducted archival research in support of an archaeological excavation of the Union Village Shaker site in Lebanon, Ohio, which resulted in a monograph series for the Ohio Department of Transportation. Project Schedule Process or Product Projected Due Date Meet with HPF grant manager and City to discuss level of documentation. February 10, 2021 Begin preliminary research in Jefferson City (this immediately follows meeting with HPF grant manager and City). Complete five survey forms for review. February 20, 2021 Submit research design to HPF grant manager. Submit documentation for first public meeting. March 6, 2021 Hold public meeting. TBD Submit final research design. March 31, 2021 Submit historic context report. Submit documentation for final public meeting. June 22, 2021 Submit final project report and invoice. August 31, 2021 Fee Schedule Owen & Eastlake will complete the tasks in this proposal for a flat fee of $42,500. Bidder’s Authorized Contact Owen & Eastlake Ltd. is committed to the completion of the project according to the enclosed schedule and fee proposal. The proposal will be valid for 90 days from the submittal date. The undersigned has the authority to commit Owens & Eastlake to the contract. ___________________________________ Rory Krupp, Principal Owen & Eastlake Ltd. References Barbara A. Powers Department Head, Inventory and Registration Ohio State Historic Preservation Office 800 E. 17th Avenue Columbus, Ohio 43211 614.289.2000 bpowers@ohiohistory.org Project: National Register Multiple Property Documentation Form, Twentieth-Century African American Civil Rights in Ohio, 1900-1970. Ashley Young Assistant City Manager Community and Economic Development Department City of Kirksville 201 South Franklin Street Kirksville, Missouri 63501 660.627.1224 ayoung@kirksvillecity.com Projects: Susan Keeney Dennison-McMillen Historic District Steering Committee 358 King Avenue Columbus, Ohio 43201 937-479-0201 slmkeeny@hotmail.com Project contact for the Dennison-McMillen Architectural Survey Resumes Rory Krupp Education Masters of Arts with distinction; American history with a Certificate in Historic Preservation; University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio; 2012. Bachelor of Arts; Major in Ancient History and Classics; Minor in Anthropology with an emphasis in prehistoric North American archaeology; The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio; 1994. Certifications and Training Meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards for history and architectural history. Pre-qualified architectural historian and historian in Ohio, Indiana, Pennsylvania, Michigan and South Dakota. Pre-qualified for archaeology in Nebraska and Oklahoma. Ohio Department of Transportation Section 106 training, September 2016 National Historic Landmark program webinars, Writing Section 8 for Criteria 1 & 2; NHL Nuts and Bolts; National Register or National Historic Landmark; Understanding Cultural Landscapes; Writing Section 8: Archaeology, and Writing Section 8 for Criterion 4: Architecture; Preparing for the Landmarks Committee. Professional Experience Owen & Eastlake Ltd, Columbus, Ohio Principal August 2012-present • Principal of historic preservation consulting firm specializing in the architectural history services, National Register nominations, historic tax credit documentation and Section 106 documentation. • Researched and co-wrote the National Register nomination for the nationally significant Hanford Village George Washington Carver Addition Historic District in Columbus, Ohio. Hardlines Design Company Inc., Columbus, Ohio Historian June 2012 • Researched and wrote report chapter that examined Zoar Village and its connection to modern regional and international art movements for the Zoar Baseline Study for the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Huntington District, Huntington, West Virginia. University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio Graduate Teaching Assistant Dept. of History Sept. 2010-June 2012 • Graded papers and exams for American and Latin American survey history classes • Taught six recitation sections of American history at the undergraduate level • Created classroom materials and presentations for recitation sections. Hardlines Design Company Inc., Columbus, Ohio Archaeologist/Historian Oct. 2009-Sept. 2010 • Researched and wrote five Historic Property Management Plans for United States Army Corps of Engineers, Huntington District of the London, Bellville, Racine, Marmet, and Robert C. Byrd Locks and Dams, Ohio and Kanawha Rivers navigation pools flowage easement areas. • Developed a prehistoric and historic contexts for the project area including a history of mining activities and other mineral extraction industries in West Virginia and southeastern Ohio • Researched and collected information about all previously recorded prehistoric and historic archaeological sites and historic properties in the project area. Summarized National Register nominations, archaeological site files and architectural inventories for the management plan. • Designed prehistoric and historic site predictive models. • Developed preservation plans for cultural resources in accordance with Section 110 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 as amended. • Recommended treatment plans and management priorities for archaeological sites and historic properties within the project area. • Consulted with preservation professionals concerning latest best practices for archaeological site and historic property preservation on Department of Defense lands. Hardlines Design Company Inc., Columbus, Ohio Archaeologist/Historian May 2005-February 2007 • Co-author of the North Family Lot site monograph series. Participated in a Phase III excavation of the main family house, broom shop, and pottery workshops at a historic Shaker site; the North Family Lot, Union Village, in Lebanon, Ohio under the direction of Andrew Sewell. Conducted primary archival using dairies and daybooks and secondary source research for Phase III Union Village Shaker • Wr ote social and economic histories of Union Village Shaker settlement for Phase III monograph series for the Ohio Department Transportation. • Researched and wrote a historic context for Cleveland Innerbelt Expansion Project Phase II history-architecture survey for Gray & Pape, Inc. for the Ohio Department of Transportation with a focus on heavy industry and immigration. • Researched and wrote Historic American Engineering Report historic context for Campbell Avenue, Cambridge, Ohio, bridge replacement project with a focus on changing bridge technologies and designs. • Participated in Phase II excavation on an early 19th century historic farmstead in Prince George's County, Maryland under the direction of Andrew Sewell. • Accessioned and created database of historic construction photographs of Emsworth, Dashields and Montgomery Locks and Dams for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Pittsburgh District. • Assisted in the preparation of Historic American Building Survey documentation. Presentations “Fervor and Fashion: How the Frontier West Changed Shaker Design” Queen City Colloquium, University of Cincinnati, May 18, 2012 Peer-Reviewed Publications Krupp, Rory 2020 “New Deal, New Serpent: Public Works Projects at the Serpent Mound State Memorial” Journal of Ohio Archaeology. Archaeological, Architecture, History Reports and National Register Nominations Krupp, Rory and Roy Hampton 2021 Phase II Reconnaissance Survey for the Memorial Park and Old Town Neighborhoods, Prepared for the City of Kirksville, Missouri, Department of Engineering and the Missouri State Historic Preservation Office. Krupp, Rory and Roy Hampton 2020 Phase I Reconnaissance Survey for the Depot District and Old Town Neighborhoods, Prepared for the City of Kirksville, Missouri, Department of Engineering and the Missouri State Historic Preservation Office. Krupp, Rory and Roy Hampton 2019 National Register of Historic Places amended nomination for the Chestnut Baptist/Quinn Chapel A.M.E. Church prepared for the City of Louisville, Kentucky. Listed May, 2020 Krupp, Rory and Roy Hampton 2019 African American Heritage Survey, Prepared for the City of Asheville, Department of Planning and Urban Design, Asheville, North Carolina. Krupp, Rory and Roy Hampton 2019 McMillen-Dennison Proposed Historic District Architectural Survey, Prepared for the McMillen-Dennison Historic District Steering Committee and the Short North Society, Columbus, Ohio Krupp, Rory and Roy Hampton 2018 National Register of Historic Places nomination for the Eugene McKinley Memorial Pool, Portsmouth, Ohio. Prepared for the Ohio State Historic Preservation Office, Funded by the National Park Service. Listed in 2018. Krupp, Rory and Roy Hampton 2018 Manse Hotel and Annex Local Designation Report. Prepared for the City of Cincinnati Historic Conservation Board. Funded by the Model Group. Krupp, Rory and Roy Hampton, Charles Casey-Leininger 2018 National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Document Form, Twentieth-Century African American Civil Rights in Ohio. Prepared for the Ohio State Historic Preservation Office. Funded by the National Park Service. Krupp, Rory and Roy Hampton 2017 National Register of Historic Places nomination for The Edna Building, Franklin County, Columbus, Ohio. Prepared for Tim Lai ArchitecT. Funded by the Ohio Development Services Agency Ohio Historic Tax Credit Pipeline Initiative. Krupp, Rory and Roy Hampton 2016 National Register of Historic Places nomination for the Franklin Park Medical Center, Franklin County, Columbus, Ohio. Prepared by Owen & Eastlake Ltd. for the Columbus Landmarks Foundation. Funded by the Ohio Development Services Agency Ohio Historic Tax Credit Pipeline Initiative. Krupp, Rory and Roy Hampton 2014 National Register of Historic Places nomination for the Theresa Building, Franklin County, Columbus, Ohio. Prepared by Owen & Eastlake Ltd. for the Columbus Landmarks Foundation. Funded by the Ohio Development Services Agency Ohio Historic Tax Credit Pipeline Initiative. Krupp, Rory and Roy Hampton 2013 National Register of Historic Places nomination for the Hanford Village George Washington Carver Addition Historic District, Franklin County, Ohio. Prepared by Owen & Eastlake Ltd for the Columbus Landmarks Foundation in conjunction with the African American history initiative. Sewell, Andrew R, Christine Trebellas, Anne B. Lee, Ben Riggle, and Rory Krupp 2013 Baseline Planning Assessments for Zoar Levee and Diversion Dam, Dam Modification Study, Historic Property Baseline Study, Lawrence Township, Tuscawaras County, Ohio. Prepared by Hardlines Design Company. Submitted to the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Huntington District. Krupp, Rory 2012 “Zoar Village and the Arts” in Baseline Planning Assessments for the Zoar Levee & Diversion Dam, Dam Safety and Modification Study, Tuscarawaras County, Ohio. Hardlines Design Company, Submitted to the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Huntington District, Huntington, West Virginia Krupp, Rory 2010 Historic Properties Management Plan for the Belleville Locks and Dam, London, West Virginia. Hardlines Design Company. Submitted to the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Huntington District 2010 Historic Properties Management Plan for the Racine Locks and Dam, West Virginia. Hardlines Design Company. Submitted to the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Huntington District 2010 Historic Properties Management Plan for the Marmet Locks and Dam, Marmet, West Virginia. Hardlines Design Company. Submitted to the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Huntington District 2010 Historic Properties Management Plan for the Robert C. Byrd Locks and Dam, Gallipolis Ferry, West Virginia. Hardlines Design Company. Submitted to the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Huntington District 2009 Historic Properties Management Plan for the London Locks and Dam, London, West Virginia. Hardlines Design Company. Submitted to the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Huntington District. Sewell, Andrew., Roy A. Hampton, and Rory Krupp 2009 Encountering the Shakers of the North Family Lot, Volume 2: A Clean and Lively Appearance-- The Landscape and Architecture of the North Family Lot. Hardlines Design Company Inc., Columbus, Ohio. Submitted to the Ohio Department of Transportation. Columbus, Ohio Sewell, Andrew., Roy A. Hampton, and Rory Krupp 2009 Encountering the Shakers of the North Family Lot, Volume 3: Tracing Prosperity and Adversity-- A Social History of the North Family Lot. Hardlines Design Company Inc., Columbus, Ohio. Submitted to the Ohio Department of Transportation. Columbus, Ohio Hampton, Roy., Heather Kennedy, and Rory Krupp 2008 Phase I Building Survey at Naval Station Great Lakes, Lake County, llinois, Vol 2 of 4. Hardlines Design Company Columbus, Ohio Submitted to Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Midwest. Great Lakes, Illinois. Krupp, Rory., Roy Hampton, and Heather Kenney 2006 Historic Context for History Architecture Survey for the Cleveland Innerbelt Phase II, Cuyahoga County, Ohio (CUY-Innerbelt, PID 77510) Hardlines Design Company, Columbus, Ohio for Gray & Pape, Cincinnati, Ohio. Hampton, Roy., Heather Kenney, and Rory Krupp 2006 Historic American Engineering Record Documentation of the Campbell Avenue Bridge. Cambridge, Guernsey County. Ohio. Hardlines Design Company Inc., Columbus, Ohio. Hampton, Roy., Heather Kenney, and Rory Krupp 2006 Phase II History/Architecture Survey Report for the A.G. Hibbs House (FRA-8615) Hardlines Design Company Inc., Columbus, Ohio. Hampton, Roy., Heather Kenney, and Rory Krupp 2006 Documentation of the Recovered Lock Materials, Monongahela Navigation Company Lock and Dam No. 2. Hardlines Design Company Submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Pittsburgh District, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Pecora, Albert M., and Rory Krupp 1999 Phase I Cultural Resource Survey of the 1641 Vogel Avenue Housing Project in the City of Columbus, Franklin County. Ohio. Ohio Valley Archaeological Services Ltd. Columbus, Ohio. Pecora, Albert M., and Rory Krupp 1999 Phase I Cultural Resource Survey Archaeological Survey of the Incidental Boundary Revision for Coal Mine Permit D-0360, Washington Township, Belmont County, Ohio. Ohio Vall ey Archaeological Services Ltd. Columbus, Ohio. Submitted to the Ohio Department of Resources. Pecora, Albert M., Jennifer A. Pederson, and Rory Krupp 1998 Phase I Cultural Resource Survey of the Proposed Temporary Road Project (Mus-60 21.47), Falls Township, Muskingum County, Ohio (Pid 12137) Ohio Valley Archaeological Services Ltd. Columbus, Ohio. Submitted to Ohio Department of Transportation. Pecora, Albert M., and Rory Krupp 1998 Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Proposed Adjacent Permit Area Application D-0424-2, Section 17, German Township, Harrison County, Ohio. Ohio Valley Archaeological Services Ltd. Columbus, Ohio. Submitted to the Ohio Department of Natural Resources. Pecora, Albert M., and Rory Krupp 1998 Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Proposed Coal Mine Permit Application #1450, Section 11, Cadiz Township, Harrison County, Ohio. Ohio Valley Archaeological Services Ltd. Columbus, Ohio. Submitted to the Ohio Department of Natural Resources. Pecora, Albert M., and Rory Krupp 1998 Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Proposed Adjacent Area Permit Application D-1059-2, Warren Township, Belmont County, Ohio. Ohio Valley Archaeological Services Ltd., Columbus, Ohio. Submitted to the Ohio Department of Natural Resources. Krupp, Rory 1993 Archaeological Reconnaissance of the Coal Prospecting Operations in the Mud River and Big Ugly Watersheds in Lincoln and Boone Counties, West Virginia. Duvall and Associates, Franklin, Tennessee. Krupp, Rory 1993 Archaeological Reconnaissance of the Pen Coal Company's Kiah Creek Permit Area Wayne County, West Virginia. Duvall and Associates, Franklin, Tennessee. Krupp, Rory Phase IV Data Recovery Survey at 33FR883, An Upland Lithic Scatter 1993 Along Hayden Run in Washington Township, Franklin County, Ohio. Archaeological Services Consultants, Inc. Columbus, Ohio. Submitted to The Ohio Public Utilities Commission and Columbia Gas of Ohio. Church, Flora., Annette Erickson, Bryan Lee, and Rory Krupp 1992 Mitigation of 33FR756 and 33FR760: Two Prehistoric Sites West of the Scioto River in Franklin County, Ohio. Archaeological Services Consultants. Columbus, Ohio. Submitted to M/I Schottenstein Homes, Inc. Columbus, Ohio. Nass, John P. Jr., John R. Wright, Lori Frye, and Rory Krupp 1992 Phase I Historic Properties Investigations, Youghiogheny River Lake Project, Fayette and Somerset Counties, Pennsylvania and Garret County, Maryland. Archaeological Services Consultants, Inc. Columbus. Ohio. Submitted to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Pittsburgh District. Wright, John R., Rory Krupp, and Chris McClaren. 1991 Assessment Survey: Site 33TU391 in the Proposed Limestone Company Mining Tract #D-0796 Archaeological Services Consultants, Inc. Columbus. Ohio. Submitted to Buckeye Services, New Philadelphia, Ohio. Wright, John R., and Rory Krupp 1990 Assessment Survey: Sites 33VI355 and 33VI356 in the Proposed Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion, Village of McAuthur, Elk Township, Vinton County, Ohio. Archaeological Services Consultants, Inc. Columbus. Ohio. Submitted to the Ohio Environmental Agency and Burgess and Niple. Columbus, Ohio. Sprague, Rae Norris, Robert Corso, and Rory Krupp 1989 Literature Review and Reconnaissance Survey of the Proposed East Muskingum Sewer Easement, Washington, Wayne, and Perry Townships, Muskingum County, Ohio. Archaeological Services Consultants, Inc. Columbus. Ohio. Submitted to the Muskingum County Sanitary Engineering Department, Zanesville, Ohio. Sprague, Rae Norris, and Rory Krupp 1989 Literature Review and Reconnaissance Survey: Valley Mining Tract #D-0740-2, Smithfield Township, Jefferson County, Ohio. Archaeological Services Consultants Inc. Columbus, Ohio. Submitted to the Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Columbus, Ohio. Professional Affiliations Organization of American Historians American Historical Association Midwest Archaeological Conference Roy A. Hampton CAREER PROFILE Experienced architectural historian and cultural resources management professional with extensive work in research and writing related to Ohio history and architecture. Author of several National Register historic district nominations and over 100 National Register eligibility studies of bridges, dams, landscapes, buildings, and neighborhoods. Also experienced with historic preservation plans, historic structures reports, and HABS/HAER documentation. • Co-author of successful National Register district nomination of Rockefeller Park and the Cleveland Cultural Gardens • Listed the Village of Gambier Historic District (Knox County, Ohio) in the National Register • Author or co-author of over 200 Ohio Historic Inventory forms • Completed ODOT inventory and evaluation projects dealing with historic districts and individual properties in Columbus and Franklin County EDUCATION AND TRAINING • B.A., History, Bellarmine University, Louisville, Kentucky • M.A., History of Art, University of Louisville, Kentucky • Ohio Department of Transportation 4-F Training, June 2011 • Ohio Department of Transportation Section 106 Training, March 2011 • National Preservation Institute’s Identification and Evaluation of Mid-Twentieth Century Buildings Training, 2002 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Senior Historian, Hardlines Design Company, Columbus, OH 1997-2012 • Researched federal HABS/HAER Collections, federal census data, and local government archives, and inventory and cultural resource report collections of the Ohio Historic Preservation Office • Completed over 100 projects related to Ohio history and architecture for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, the State of Ohio departments of Transportation and Natural Resources, as well as the U.S. Forest Service • Composed online guide to using Ohio Public Library Information Network Sanborn map collection • Co-authored several cultural resources management plans for historic military installations including the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard (Maine), former Philadelphia Naval Shipyard, and Naval Station Great Lakes, Illinois Researcher, Louisville Development Authority, Louisville, Kentucky 1994-1995 • Researched deeds, maps, local histories, and government documents • Managed public access to commission research files and reference library • Authored National Register nomination for the Smoketown Historic District, for Louisville’s oldest African-American neighborhood • Completed additional National Register-related survey work in the Shelby Park neighborhood PUBLICATIONS • Co-author with Christine Trebellas, Historic Context Report for the Ohio Department of Highways Bureau of Bridges, 1911-1945. Available at www.state.oh.us/Divisions/Planning/Environment/Context Studies/ODOT Bureau of Bridges Context 2012. • Author, “Researching Your Property with Ohio Public Library Information Network Sanborn Maps,” 2012 (prepared for Hardlines Design Company, Columbus, Ohio, available at http//hardlinesdesign.com). • Innovation on the Monongahela, The Construction of Braddock Dam, softcover booklet, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Pittsburgh District, 2008. • Co-author with Maria Burkett, Aerospace Technology at Naval Weapons Industrial Reserve Plant Bloomfield. U.S. Navy Facilities Engineering Command, Mid-Atlantic Division, 2008. • Author, “German Gothic in the Midwest, the Church Architecture of Adolphus Druiding and Franz Georg Himpler.” U.S Catholic Historian, May 1997. SELECTED PROJECTS Phase I and II Surveys for I-70/71, Columbus, Ohio. Assessed the National Register eligibility of more than 400 buildings as part of a large highway interchange study. The project included evaluation of buildings that had not been previously surveyed, plus identification and reassessment of contributing and non-contributing properties in several National Register and City of Columbus local historic districts. National Register District Nomination, Rockefeller Park and the Cleveland Cultural Gardens, Cuyahoga County, Ohio. Co-authored a National Register district nomination covering Rockefeller Park, a major urban park space that is an excellent example of the Victorian Picturesque landscape style. The nomination also included the Cleveland Cultural Gardens, a series of landscapes within the park that commemorate Cleveland’s ethnic diversity. The district was successfully listed in the National Register in 2005. National Register Nomination, Village of Gambier, Knox County, Ohio. Surveyed over 150 buildings in the Village of Gambier and listed the village in the National Register of Historic Places. The new Gambier historic district included the village’s significant commercial and residential properties as well as an existing National Register historic district covering the Kenyon College campus. ATTACHMENT A – COST FORM Costs Related to the Historic East Side Survey Itemized Expenditure Cost Total Cost – Historic East Survey ITEM 2 Costs Related to the Historic West Main, Lower Jefferson, Waterworks Complex Survey Itemized Expenditure Cost Total Cost – Historic East Survey ITEM 3 Costs Related to the Historic Context Study Itemized Expenditure Cost Labor @ 75.00 39,000 Travel $2,500 Editorial services $1,000 Total Cost – Historic East Survey $42,500