HomeMy Public PortalAbout2022-03-08 packetIndividuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as
required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request.
Please call 573-634-6410 for information regarding agenda items.
NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING AND TENTATIVE AGENDA i
City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission
Tuesday, March 8, 2022, ~ 6:00 p.m.
John G. Christy Municipal Building, Council Chambers, 320 E. McCarty Street
Virtual Option-WebEx
https://jeffersoncity.webex.com/jeffersoncity/j.php?MTID=m173912bc5024865bc818502e98aad8d8
Password: 1234
Join by Phone: +14043971516 US Toll
Access Code: 2484 815 5514
TENTATIVE AGENDA
1. Introductions and Roll Call
2. Procedural Matters
• Determination of quorum
• Call for cases
• Receive and review requests for continuance
• Receive requests for reordering the agenda
• Format of hearing
• List of exhibits
3. Adoption of Agenda (as printed or reordered)
4. Approval of February 8, 2022, Regular Meeting Minutes
5. Old Business
a. Work Session
6. New Business
a. West Main Phase II Survey Project- David Taylor
b. Jefferson City Historic East Re-Survey- David Taylor
c. Historic Context Project- Rory Krupp
7. Other Business
a. Code Revision Update
b. Preservation Month-May 2022
c. Missouri Preservation Conference- June 13-15, 2022
d. Certified Local Government (CLG) Coordinator
8. Public Comment
9. Dates to Remember
a. Next Regular Meeting Date, April 12, 2022
10. Adjournment
City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission Minutes
Regular Meeting – Tuesday, February 8, 2022
Boone-Bancroft Room – John G. Christy Municipal Building
320 E. McCarty Street/Virtual WebEx Meeting
Commission Members Present Attendance Record
Donna Deetz, Chairperson 2 of 2
Alan Wheat, Vice Chairperson 2 of 2
Gail Jones 2 of 2
Tiffany Patterson 2 of 2
Brad Schaefer 2 of 2
Commission Members Absent Attendance Record
Steven Hoffman 0 of 1
Michael Berendzen 0 of 1
Council Liaison Present
Laura Ward
Staff Present
Rachel Senzee, Neighborhood Services Supervisor
Karlie Reinkemeyer, Neighborhood Services Specialist
Anne Stratman, Neighborhood Services Specialist
Dawn Kirchner, Neighborhood Services Specialist
Guests Present
Rory Krupp, Owen & Eastlake Historic Preservation Consultant
Call to Order
Ms. Deetz called the meeting to order at 6:03 p.m.
Adoption of Agenda
Ms. Patterson moved and Ms. Jones seconded to adopt the agenda as printed. The motion passed
unanimously.
Approval of Regular Meeting Minutes
Mr. Wheat moved and Ms. Patterson seconded to approve the minutes from January 16, 2022, Regular
Meeting as written. The motion passed unanimously.
Old Business
A. Historic Preservation Commission Work Session
Ms. Deetz passed around a hard copy with dates to schedule a Historic Preservation Commission work
session. She asked commissioners to select dates that they are available.
New Business
A. Landmark Awards
Ms. Senzee stated that the Landmark Awards would normally be open at this time. Ms. Senzee
explained that the Code Revision Committee is reviewing the current Landmark Award code. Ms. Senzee
asked the commissioners if they want to open the Landmark Awards now or wait until the new historic
preservation code is finalized. Ms. Deetz and Mr. Schaefer recommended waiting to open the Landmark
Awards in case there are changes in the code. Ms. Senzee explained that the Landmark Award
application is based on what is found in the city code, so changes to the application are limited.
Mr. Wheat moved and Ms. Patterson seconded to delay opening the Landmark Award Application until
the Code Revision Committee finalizes any changes to the Landmark Award code. The motion passed
unanimously.
B. Historic Context- Rory Krupp
Ms. Senzee stated that the City of Jefferson pursued Historic Preservation funds to hire a consultant that
will produce a historic context of the City. Ms. Senzee explained that a historic context will tell us the
developmental history of the City. The historic context is identified as a key component in the 2019
Historic Preservation Plan. Ms. Senzee explained that a Request for Proposals and the best bid was
Owen & Eastlake. As part of the grant milestones, Owen & Eastlake have to hold two public meetings.
Ms. Senzee explained that the February 8th meeting is the first public meeting for Owen & Eastlake. Ms.
Senzee introduced Rory Krupp from Owen & Eastlake.
Mr. Krupp explained that Owen & Eastlake have already started gathering information. Mr. Krupp said
the context will look at the developmental history of neighborhoods, and answer the question of “how
did we get here?”. Mr. Krupp said the finished product will provide insight on how to prioritize buildings
and neighborhoods in the historical sense. Mr. Krupp said the context will also touch on economic
development suggestions, what structures are in danger and what structures should be saved
immediately, developmental patterns, examine transportation patterns and educational institutions.
Mr. Krupp stated that NAACP files are often used for components of the context that touch on African-
American communities and history. Mr. Krupp explained that Owen & Eastlake have completed a civil
rights context for the State of Ohio and a context for an African American neighborhood in Louisville.
Mr. Krupp said the context will cover everything including the good and the bad.
Mr. Krupp plans to come to Jefferson City at the beginning of March to look around the City for a couple
of weeks. Ms. Senzee explained that the City will provide old city plans and old maps to
Mr. Krupp. Ms. Senzee explained that commissioners have ties to other resources that would be an
asset to the historic context.
Other Business
A. Code Revision Update
Ms. Deetz explained that the Code Revision Committee did not meet on February 3rd due to the snow
and weather. Ms. Senzee stated that city staff is continuing work on the code and will have the attorney
review it. Ms. Senzee said at the next Code Revision Committee the committee will be reviewing the
“Review” processes for local historic districts and local landmarks. Ms. Senzee explained that Glover
Brown is interested in pursuing an ordinance that would codify the boundaries of the Historic Foot
District and codify the Historic Foot District as a local historic district. The ordinance would have no land-
use restrictions. Ms. Senzee explained that Mr. Brown may be coming before the Historic Preservation
Commission to request this ordinance.
B. Preservation Month-May 2022
Ms. Senzee stated that the tentative work session would allow the commissioners to discuss
Preservation Month activities more in-depth.
C. Missouri Preservation Conference- June 13-15, 2022
Ms. Senzee stated that she has not heard anything if the Missouri Preservation Conference is still being
held. Ms. Deetz said that she has heard that it is still scheduled.
Ms. Patterson stated that the Missouri Conference on History is March 16-18, 2022 in Jefferson City,
Missouri.
Public Comment
Dates to Remember
A. Next Regular Meeting Date-March 8, 2022.
Adjournment
Ms. Patterson moved and Ms. Jones seconded to adjourn the meeting at 6:31 p.m. The motion passed
unanimously.
RESEARCH DESIGN
WEST MAIN STREET PHASE II SURVEY
JEFFERSON CITY, MISSOURI
SHPO PROJECT NUMBER XXX
Prepared by
David L. Taylor, Historic Preservation Consultant
19 Cherry Alley
Brookville, PA 15825
2022
This project is being supported in part by the Historic Preservation Fund, administered by the National Park Service, Department of
the Interior and Missouri Department of Natural Resources, State Historic Preservation Office. The views and conclusions contained in
this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the U.S. Government,
or Department of Natural Resources, State Historic Preservation Office. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not
constitute their endorsement by the U.S. Government, or Department of Natural Resources, State Historic Preservation Office.
Overview
In the summer of 2021, the City of Jefferson was awarded two historic preservation grants
from the Missouri Department of Natural Resources, State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) to
conduct surveys of portions of the capitol city. The projects would document a series of proper-
ties determine if these areas or individual components thereof meet the standards for National
Register-eligible historic districts, to identify potential boundaries for such districts, and to iden-
tify any individual properties or districts that might be National Register-eligible. Public meetings
would be held at the beginning and end of the project. At the conclusion, a final survey report
would include sufficient historical background to evaluate the areas’ significance under National
Register criteria, descriptions and analyses of property types within the survey areas, and recom-
mendations for future survey and National Register activity.
In the fall of 2021, a Request for Proposals was issued by the City of Jefferson stating that
the City was seeking a consultant to conduct intensive architectural/historical surveys of portions
of the community. The RFP stated that the project would document approximately 750 proper-
ties within the historic core of Jefferson City. This document covers one of the survey areas, the
West Main Street area and the Lower Jefferson Subdivision and the Waterworks Complex; the
survey title was shortened to the West Main Street Phase II Survey.
The consultant chosen would be required to be a 36 CFR 61-qualified contractor who
would work closely and directly with the City’s Department of Planning and Protective Services
(PPS) and the City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission (HPC).
As noted above, the project is funded by a Historic Preservation Fund Grant from the U.
S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, administered by the Missouri State Historic
Preservation Office, an agency of the Missouri Department of Natural Resources. Funding for
this project was made available through a Certified Local Government Grant (Project Number
xxxx) to the SHPO from the U. S. Department of the Interior/National Park Service, Historic
Preservation Fund.
Following proper procurement, historic preservation consultant David Taylor was se-
lected to undertake the survey project, which has a timeline beginning in January 2022 and con-
tinuing through July 2022. The Consultant received a contract on December 23, 2021 and imme-
diately signed it and returned it to the City. The contract was approved at a City Council meeting
in January 2022. His professional qualifications had been previously accepted by the SHPO under
36 CFR 61. A Pennsylvania consultant, Taylor had undertaken multiple similar projects in the
Missouri communities of Joplin, Cuba, Moberly, Lee’s Summit, and Ferguson.
Objectives
The project consisted of several specific objectives:
• to complete a research design, setting forth the process of the survey
• to identify and document the properties within the aforementioned areas within
the City of Jefferson, Cole County, Missouri.
• to conduct an architectural survey of this study area, photographing all properties,
undertaking local history research, and completing SHPO Architectural/Historic In-
ventory Forms for each.
• to conduct public meetings to present the survey to the community, one at the
project outset and another, at the completion of the project, to present the results
of the project, its findings, and recommendations for further preservation-based
initiatives
• to prepare a Survey Report that, along with all other survey products, would be
delivered to the Department of Planning and Protective Services and to the State
Historic Preservation Office (SHPO).
At the outset of the project this document was developed and was submitted both to the
City PPS and to the SHPO.
Research Design
Introduction
This project consists of a survey of portions the City of Jefferson, which is the state capitol
of the State of Missouri and lies along the west bank of the Missouri River, nearly mid-state and
roughly equidistant between St. Louis and Kansas City.
It is estimated that the West Main Street Phase II Survey area contain 32 acres and ap-
proximately 203 properties.
Objective of the Survey
This project has as its goal the documentation and recordation of individual properties
within the aforementioned area and their evaluation, both as properties individually eligible for
the National Register of Historic Places and as elements in potential historic districts. In addition
to this, suggested boundaries for potential historic districts will be identified.
Geographical Description of the Survey Areas
As noted above, this project involves the West Main Street Phase II Survey area. It is gen-
erally bounded by U.S. Highway 54 to the east, Havana Street to the west, Main Street and the
municipal water plant to the north, and West McCarty Street and a segment of Industrial Drive
to the south.
The survey area is primarily residential in character, consisting of an essentially built-out
grid of streets, some with alleys, populated by detached houses of one, 1½, and two stories, built
of brick and wood alike, with gabled, hipped, and occasionally the gambrel roof forms. The build-
ings date primarily from the early decades of the twentieth century into the early years of the
twenty-first. Architectural styles include gabled ells and other vernacular houses,1 Bungalows
and other Craftsman-style derivatives, American Foursquares, some Colonial and Dutch Colonial
Revivals, and Minimal Traditional houses from the middle decades of the last century. Several
examples of repetitive house types are found throughout this survey area. A modern brick multi-
unit apartment building is at 1100 West High Street, at the corner of West High and Berry Streets,
and the 1903 former West Side School at 1107 West Main Street has been repurposed for multi-
1 The term, “vernacular,” conforms to the definition in Ward Bucher’s Dictionary of Building Preservation: “a build-
ing built without being designed by an architect or someone with similar formal training, often based on traditional
or regional forms.”
tenant housing. The Missouri American Water facility anchors the northeastern corner of this
area, along the Missouri River.
Historic contexts within this survey area are expected to be Early-to-Mid-Twentieth-Cen-
tury Domestic Design and Early-to-Mid-Twentieth-Century Commercial Design.
Survey Process and Methodology
Depending upon the response from community members, some volunteers may be used
to gather information on individual properties within the subject area. All work elements will be
either undertaken by the Consultant or directly overseen by him. In any case, each street within
the project area will be traveled and photographs will be taken of each property, including non-
historic properties and vacant lots. Photography will take place from public rights-of-way and,
depending upon the physical character of individual properties, may include more than one im-
age. The images will be taken with a Canon digital SLR camera and will be produced at a scale of
1,600 x 1,200 pixels at 300 dpi; JPEG images will be provided, and TIFF images can be supplied if
requested. The images will each be labeled according to SHPO requirements, i.e.,
MO_Cole_West Main Street Phase II Survey_001.JPG, etc. When available, historic images will
be provided as well as contemporary views.
Following initial fieldwork and photography, an Excel database will be prepared covering
all surveyed properties.
Each property in the survey area will be documented according to the Missouri State His-
toric Preservation Office’s “Standards for Architectural and Historic Surveys” and “Instructions
for Completing the General Architectural Survey Form.”
Local and regional history and public record research will be carried out, including the
study of public documents, published sources, historic photos, post card collections, and Internet
and oral sources. It is hoped that Jefferson City citizens will be able to provide oral historical
information about some of the properties within the study area. Public records and published
collections will be consulted including those of the Cole County Historical Society, the Missouri
River Regional Library, the Missouri Historical Society, and the State Historical Society of Missouri,
among others. Historic maps, including Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps, will be consulted as well.
Internet sources will include ancestry.com, newspapers.com, and citydirectories.com.
Mapping of the survey area will be prepared, noting the survey boundaries, individual
resources (keyed to the contributing or non-contributing status of each), associated outbuildings,
streets and alleys, any waterways, and potential historic district boundaries. Mapping will be
provided in a digital format.
Resources within the project area will be evaluated as to their character and potential for
National Register or local designation. As the final step in the process, a Survey Report will be
prepared, describing the scope and scale of the survey, the project’s methodology, a description
of the historic contexts identified in the course of the project, a description of property types
identified by the survey, an explanation of the rationale for the evaluation of individual resources,
and recommendations for potential subsequent survey activities and National Register nomina-
tions for individual buildings and historic districts.
Two public informational meetings will be held in the course of the project; the first public
meeting for this project is scheduled for March 8 at 6:00 P. M. in City Hall and will be held con-
currently with the regular meeting of the Jefferson City Historic Preservation Commission. The
second survey, the Jefferson City Historic East Re-Survey, will be discussed at this meeting as well.
The first meeting will introduce the community to the survey, explaining its purpose and schedule
and answering any questions that participants may have. Information about specific properties
will be solicited from attendees at this kick-off meeting. The second meeting will occur at the
project’s conclusion, will be illustrated with images from the survey, and will present the results
and findings of the project as well as the recommendations emanating from the undertaking.
Both meetings will include discussion of historic preservation in general and the National Register
in particular, noting the specific benefits of listing. The Consultant will prepare news releases for
both meetings; the news releases can be submitted to the media or inserted into the Historic
Perseveration Commission’s website. In addition, when he is in Jefferson City, Consultant David
Taylor will be available to participate in media talk shows, to speak with members of the media,
or to address community organizations about the project.
Unlike previous studies, the COVID pandemic may affect the availability of some reposi-
tories. This will not be known until fieldwork begins. This is the only anticipated problem, but it
will not have an effect on the other components of the project, including photography, physical
descriptions, Internet research, and the preparation of survey forms and associated documents.
The Consultant will work closely with the SHPO, the City, and other relevant parties
throughout the project and all products will be submitted to the City for review and comment
prior to their submission to the SHPO.
Expected Results
It is anticipated that this project will result in the preparation of upwards of 200 survey forms,
mapping, and a Survey Report covering this specific area. The Report will identify individual
buildings and historic districts that appear eligible for the National Register of Historic Places and
will also incorporate discussion of the methodology of the survey, and the historic contexts iden-
tified therein. A physical description of the survey area will be included in the report, as will
discussion of architectural styles and building types found within the area.
Survey Scope and Scale
There are several distinct types of cultural resource surveys as that term is understood by
SHPOs and historic preservation professionals across the country. Among these is a thematic
survey, researching, documenting, and evaluating properties that share a specific architectural
or historical theme, such as the architecture of Jefferson City architects Kennerly & Steigmeyer or
dairy barns in Wright County, Missouri. Another is a reconnaissance-level survey, consisting of a
“first look” at a broad group of historic resources in an area, often consisting of visual surveys
that identify the general distribution, location, and physical nature of cultural resources within a
specific geographical area. A third type of survey is an intensive-level historic resource survey that
carries out documentation and research on every property within a specific area. It is this third
type of survey that will be completed for the West Main Street Phase II Survey.
RESEARCH DESIGN
JEFFERSON CITY HISTORIC EAST RE-SURVEY
JEFFERSON CITY, MISSOURI
SHPO PROJECT NUMBER XXX
Prepared by
David L. Taylor, Historic Preservation Consultant
19 Cherry Alley
Brookville, PA 15825
2022
This project is being supported in part by the Historic Preservation Fund, administered by the National Park Service, Department of
the Interior and Missouri Department of Natural Resources, State Historic Preservation Office. The views and conclusions contained in
this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the U.S. Government,
or Department of Natural Resources, State Historic Preservation Office. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not
constitute their endorsement by the U.S. Government, or Department of Natural Resources, State Historic Preservation Office.
Overview
In the summer of 2021, the City of Jefferson was awarded two historic preservation grants
from the Missouri Department of Natural Resources, State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) to
conduct surveys of portions of the capitol city. The projects would document a series of proper-
ties determine if these areas or individual components thereof meet the standards for National
Register-eligible historic districts, to identify potential boundaries for such districts, and to iden-
tify any individual properties or districts that might be National Register-eligible. Public meetings
would be held at the beginning and end of the project. At the conclusion, a final survey report
would include sufficient historical background to evaluate the areas’ significance under National
Register criteria, descriptions and analyses of property types within the survey areas, and recom-
mendations for future survey and National Register activity.
In the fall of 2021, a Request for Proposals was issued by the City of Jefferson stating that
the City was seeking a consultant to conduct intensive architectural/historical surveys of portions
of the community. The RFP stated that the project would document approximately 750 proper-
ties within the historic core of Jefferson City. This document covers one of the survey areas, the
Jefferson City Historic East Re-Survey Survey.
The consultant chosen would be required to be a 36 CFR 61-qualified contractor who
would work closely and directly with the City’s Department of Planning and Protective Services
(PPS) and the City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission (HPC).
As noted above, the project is funded by a Historic Preservation Fund Grant from the U.
S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, administered by the Missouri State Historic
Preservation Office, an agency of the Missouri Department of Natural Resources. Funding for
this project was made available through a Certified Local Government Grant (Project Number
xxxx) to the SHPO from the U. S. Department of the Interior/National Park Service, Historic
Preservation Fund.
Following proper procurement, historic preservation consultant David Taylor was se-
lected to undertake the survey project, which has a timeline beginning in January 2022 and con-
tinuing through July 2022. The Consultant received a contract on December 23, 2021 and imme-
diately signed it and returned it to the City. The contract was approved at a City Council meeting
in January 2022. His professional qualifications had been previously accepted by the SHPO under
36 CFR 61. A Pennsylvania consultant, Taylor had undertaken multiple similar projects in the
Missouri communities of Joplin, Cuba, Moberly, Lee’s Summit, and Ferguson.
Objectives
The project consisted of several specific objectives:
• to complete a research design, setting forth the process of the survey
• to identify and document the properties within the aforementioned areas within
the City of Jefferson, Cole County, Missouri.
• to conduct an architectural survey of this study area, photographing all properties,
undertaking local history research, and completing SHPO Architectural/Historic In-
ventory Forms for each.
• to consult in-depth the 1992 Historic Jefferson East Survey carried out by URBANA
Group, and to integrate relevant data inro the new survey forms.
• to conduct public meetings to present the survey to the community, one at the
project outset and another, at the completion of the project, to present the results
of the project, its findings, and recommendations for further preservation-based
initiatives
• to prepare a Survey Report that, along with all other survey products, would be
delivered to the Department of Planning and Protective Services and to the State
Historic Preservation Office (SHPO).
At the outset of the project this document was developed and was submitted both to the
City PPS and to the SHPO.
Research Design
Introduction
This project consists of a survey of portions the City of Jefferson, which is the state capitol
of the State of Missouri and lies along the west bank of the Missouri River, nearly mid-state and
roughly equidistant between St. Louis and Kansas City.
It is estimated that the Jefferson City Historic East Re-Survey area contains approximately
220 acres and approximately 550 properties.
Objective of the Survey
This project has as its goal the documentation and recordation of individual properties
within the aforementioned area and their evaluation, both as properties individually eligible for
the National Register of Historic Places and as elements in potential historic districts. In addition
to this, suggested boundaries for potential historic districts will be identified.
Geographical Description of the Survey Areas
As noted above, this project involves the Jefferson City Historic East Re-Survey area that
is generally bounded on the north by portions of East Capitol and High Streets, on the west by
Adams Street, on the east by Benton Street, and on the south by U.S. Highway 53.
The survey area is mixed-use in character, consisting of an essentially built-out grid of
streets, some with alleys, populated by commercial buildings and detached houses of one, 1½,
and two stories, built of brick and wood alike, with gabled, hipped, and occasionally the gambrel
roof forms. The buildings date primarily from the later decades of the nineteenth century into
the early years of the twenty-first. Architectural styles include gabled ells and other vernacular
houses,1 Bungalows and other Craftsman-style derivatives, American Foursquares, some Colonial
and Dutch Colonial Revivals, and Minimal Traditional houses from the middle decades of the last
century, long with commercial buildings, Italianate and vernacular alike, dating from the same
period.
Historic contexts within this survey area are expected to be Mid-Nineteenth-to-Mid-
Twentieth-Century Domestic Design and Late-Nineteenth-to Early-Twenty-first-Century Commer-
cial Design.
1 The term, “vernacular,” conforms to the definition in Ward Bucher’s Dictionary of Building Preservation: “a build-
ing built without being designed by an architect or someone with similar formal training, often based on traditional
or regional forms.”
Survey Process and Methodology
Depending upon the response from community members, some volunteers may be used
to gather information on individual properties within the subject area. All work elements will be
either undertaken by the Consultant or directly overseen by him. In any case, each street within
the project area will be traveled and photographs will be taken of each property, including non-
historic properties and vacant lots. Photography will take place from public rights-of-way and,
depending upon the physical character of individual properties, may include more than one im-
age. The images will be taken with a Canon digital SLR camera and will be produced at a scale of
1,600 x 1,200 pixels at 300 dpi; JPEG images will be provided, and TIFF images can be supplied if
requested. The images will each be labeled according to SHPO requirements, i.e., MO_Cole_Jef-
ferson City East Re-Survey_001.JPG, etc. When available, historic images will be provided as well
as contemporary views.
Following initial fieldwork and photography, an Excel database will be prepared covering
all surveyed properties.
Each property in the survey area will be documented according to the Missouri State His-
toric Preservation Office’s “Standards for Architectural and Historic Surveys” and “Instructions
for Completing the General Architectural Survey Form.”
Local and regional history and public record research will be carried out, including the
study of public documents, published sources, historic photos, post card collections, and Internet
and oral sources. It is hoped that Jefferson City citizens will be able to provide oral historical
information about some of the properties within the study area. Public records and published
collections will be consulted including those of the Cole County Historical Society, the Missouri
River Regional Library, the Missouri Historical Society, and the State Historical Society of Missouri,
among others. Historic maps, including Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps, will be consulted as well.
Internet sources will include ancestry.com, newspapers.com, and citydirectories.com.
Mapping of the survey area will be prepared, noting the survey boundaries, individual
resources (keyed to the contributing or non-contributing status of each), associated outbuildings,
streets and alleys, any waterways, and potential historic district boundaries. Mapping will be
provided in a digital format.
Resources within the project area will be evaluated as to their character and potential for
National Register or local designation. As the final step in the process, a Survey Report will be
prepared, describing the scope and scale of the survey, the project’s methodology, a description
of the historic contexts identified in the course of the project, a description of property types
identified by the survey, an explanation of the rationale for the evaluation of individual resources,
and recommendations for potential subsequent survey activities and National Register nomina-
tions for individual buildings and historic districts.
Two public informational meetings will be held in the course of the project; the first public
meeting for this project is scheduled for March 8 at 6:00 P. M. in City Hall and will be held con-
currently with the regular meeting of the Jefferson City Historic Preservation Commission. The
second survey, the Main Street Phase II Survey, will be discussed at this meeting as well. The first
meeting will introduce the community to the survey, explaining its purpose and schedule and
answering any questions that participants may have. Information about specific properties will
be solicited from attendees at this kick-off meeting. The second meeting will occur at the pro-
ject’s conclusion, will be illustrated with images from the survey, and will present the results and
findings of the project as well as the recommendations emanating from the undertaking. Both
meetings will include discussion of historic preservation in general and the National Register in
particular, noting the specific benefits of listing. The Consultant will prepare news releases for
both meetings; the news releases can be submitted to the media or inserted into the Historic
Perseveration Commission’s website. In addition, when he is in Jefferson City, Consultant David
Taylor will be available to participate in media talk shows, to speak with members of the media,
or to address community organizations about the project.
Unlike previous studies, the COVID pandemic may affect the availability of some reposi-
tories. This will not be known until fieldwork begins. This is the only anticipated problem, but it
will not have an effect on the other components of the project, including photography, physical
descriptions, Internet research, and the preparation of survey forms and associated documents.
The Consultant will work closely with the SHPO, the City, and other relevant parties
throughout the project and all products will be submitted to the City for review and comment
prior to their submission to the SHPO.
Expected Results
It is anticipated that this project will result in the preparation of upwards of 500 survey forms,
mapping, and a Survey Report covering this specific area. The Report will identify individual
buildings and historic districts that appear eligible for the National Register of Historic Places and
will also incorporate discussion of the methodology of the survey, and the historic contexts iden-
tified therein. A physical description of the survey area will be included in the report, as will
discussion of architectural styles and building types found within the area.
Survey Scope and Scale
There are several distinct types of cultural resource surveys as that term is understood by
SHPOs and historic preservation professionals across the country. Among these is a thematic
survey, researching, documenting, and evaluating properties that share a specific architectural
or historical theme, such as the architecture of Jefferson City architects Kennerly & Steigmeyer or
dairy barns in Wright County, Missouri. Another is a reconnaissance-level survey, consisting of a
“first look” at a broad group of historic resources in an area, often consisting of visual surveys
that identify the general distribution, location, and physical nature of cultural resources within a
specific geographical area. A third type of survey is an intensive-level historic resource survey that
carries out documentation and research on every property within a specific area. It is this third
type of survey that will be completed for the Jefferson City Historic East Re-Survey.
CITY OF JEFFERSON
CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the date last executed by a party as indicated below, by and
between the City of Jefferson, a municipal corporation of the State of Missouri, hereinafter referred to as
"City", and David L. Taylor, hereinafter referred to as "'Contractor".
WITNESSETH:
THAT WHEREAS, the City desires to engage the Contractor to render certain services to conduct
a reconnaissance level architectural study of the historic east and west side of .Jefferson City, hereinafter
described in Exhibit A.
WHEREAS, Contractor has made certain representations and statements to the City with respect
to the provision of such services and the City has accepted said proposal to enter into a contract with the
Contractor for the performance of services by the Contractor.
NOW THEREFORE, for the considerations herein expressed, it is agreed by and between the City
and the Contractor as follows:
1. Scope of Services.
Contractor agrees to provide all supervision, labor, tools, equipment, materials and supplies to conduct a
reconnaissance level architectural study of the historic east and west side of Jefferson City, as set forth in
Exhibit A. In the event of a conflict between this agreement and any attached exhibits, the provisions of
this agreement shall govern and prevail.
2. Payment.
The City hereby agrees to pay Contractor for the work done pursuant to this contract according to the
payment schedule set forth in the contract documents upon acceptance of said work by an Agent of the City
of Jefferson, and in accordance with the rates and/or amounts stated in the bid of Contractor dated
November 22, 2021, which are by reference made a part hereof. No partial payment to Contractor shall
operate as approval or acceptance of work done or materials furnished hereunder. No change in
compensation shall be made unless there is a substantial and significant difference between the work
originally contemplated by this agreement and the work actually required. The total amount for services
rendered under this contract shall not exceed Twelve Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty Dollars and Zero
Cents ($12,750.00) for each of the two survey areas (east and west side of the City), or Twenty -Five
Thousand Five Hundred Dollars and Zero Cents ($25,500.00) total.
3. Term.
This contract shall commence on the date last executed by a party as indicated below. The Contractor shall
conduct a reconnaissance level architectural study of the historic east and west side of Jefferson City, as set
forth in Exhibit A, by July 15, 2022.
4. Additional Services.
The City may add to Contractor services or delete therefrom activities of a similar nature to those set forth
in Exhibit A, provided that the total cost of such work does not exceed the total cost allowance as specified
in paragraph 2 hereof. The Contractor shall undertake such changed activities only upon the direction of
the City. All such directives and changes shall be in written form and approved by the City and shall be
accepted and countersigned by the Contractor or its agreed representatives.
2
5. Personnel to be Provided.
The Contractor represents that Contractor has or will secure at its expense all personnel required to perform
the services called for under this contract by the Contractor. Such personnel shall not be employees of or
have any contractual relationship with the City except as employees of the Contractor. All of the services
required hereunder will be performed by the Contractor or under the Contractor's direct supervision and all
personnel engaged in the work shall be fully qualified and shall be authorized under state and local law to
perform such services. None of the work or services covered by this contract shall be subcontracted except
as provided in Exhibit A without the written approval of the City.
6. Contractor's Responsibility for Subcontractors.
It is further agreed that Contractor shall be as fully responsible to the City for the acts and omissions of its
subcontractors, and of persons either directly or indirectly employed by them, as Contractor is for the acts
and omissions of persons it directly employs. Contractor shall cause appropriate provisions to be inserted
in all subcontracts relating to this work, to bind all subcontractors to Contractor by all the terms herein set
forth, insofar as applicable to the work of subcontractors and to give Contractor the same power regarding
termination of any subcontract as the City may exercise over Contractor under any provisions of this
contract. Nothing contained in this contract shall create any contractual relations between any
subcontractor and the City or between any subcontractors.
7. Independent Contractor.
The Contractor is an independent contractor and nothing herein shall constitute or designate the Contractor
or any of its employees as agents or employees of the City.
S. Benefits not Available.
The Contractor shall not be entitled to any of the benefits established for the employees of the City and
shall not be covered by the Workmen's Compensation Program of the City.
9. Nondiscrimination.
The Contractor agrees in the performance of the contract not to discriminate on the grounds or because of
race, creed, color, national origin or ancestry, sex, religion, handicap, age or political affiliation, against
any employee of Contractor or applicant for employment and shall include a similar provision in all
subcontracts let or awarded hereunder.
10. Illegal Im mi E ratio n.
Prior to commencement of the work:
a. Contractor shall, by sworn affidavit and provision of documentation, affirm its enrollment
and participation in a federal work authorization program with respect to the employees
working in connection with the contracted services.
b. Contractor shall sign an affidavit affirming that it does not knowingly employ any person
who is an unauthorized alien in connection with the contracted services.
c. If Contractor is a sole proprietorship, partnership, or limited partnership, Contractor shall
provide proof of citizenship or lawful presence of the owner.
11. Notice to Proceed.
The services of the Contractor shall commence upon execution of this Agreement, and shall be undertaken
and completed in accordance with the schedule contained in Exhibit A.
3
12. Termination.
If, through any cause, the Contractor shall fail to fulfill in timely and proper manner its obligations under
this contract, or if the Contractor shall violate any of the covenants, agreements, or stipulations of this
contract, the City shall thereupon have the right to terminate this contract by giving written notice to the
Contractor of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof, at least five (5) days before the
effective day of such termination. The City reserves the right to terminate this contract for convenience
by giving at least fourteen (14) days prior written notice to Contractor, without prejudice to any other rights
or remedies of the City, provide Contractor shall be entitled to payment for all work completed by
Contractor through the date of termination. The Contractor may without cause terminate this contract upon
30 days prior written notice. In either such event all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies,
surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs, and reports or other materials prepared by the Contractor
under this contract shall, at the option of the City, become its property, and the compensation for any
satisfactory work completed on such documents and other materials shall be determined. Notwithstanding
the above, the Contractor shall not be relieved of liability to the City for damages sustained by the City by
virtue of any such breach of contract by the Contractor.
13. Waiver of Breach.
Failure to insist upon strict compliance with any of the terms covenants or conditions herein shall not be
deemed a waiver of any such terms, covenants or conditions, nor shall any failure at one or more times be
deemed a waiver or relinquishment at any other time or times by any right under the terms, covenants or
conditions herein.
14. Authorship and Enforcement.
Parties agree that the production of this document was the joint effort of both parties and that the contract
should not be construed as having been drafted by either party. In the event that the City successfully
enforces the terms of this contract through litigation, the City shall be entitled to receive, in addition to any
other relief, its reasonable attorney's fees, expenses and costs.
15. Severability.
If any section, subsection, sentence, or clause of this contract shall be adjudged illegal, invalid, or
unenforceable, such illegality, invalidity, or unenforceability shall not affect the legality, validity, or
enforceability of the contract as a whole, or of any section, subsection, sentence, clause. or attachment not
so adjudged.
16. Assignment.
The Contractor shall not assign any interest in this contract, and shall not transfer any interest in the same
(whether by assignment or novation), without prior written consent of the City thereto. Any such
assignment is expressly subject to all rights and remedies of the City under this agreement, including the
right to change or delete activities from the contract or to terminate the same as provided herein, and no
such assignment shall require the City to give any notice to any such assignee of any actions which the City
may take under this agreement. though City wilI attempt to so notify any such assignee.
17. Existing Data.
All information, data and reports as are existing, available and necessary for the carrying out of the work,
shall be furnished to the Contractor without charge by the City, and the City shall cooperate with the
Contractor in every reasonable way in carrying out the scope of services. The Contractor shall not be
liable for the accuracy of the information furnished by the City.
4
18. Confidentiality.
Any reports, data or similar information given to or prepared or assembled by the Contractor under this
contract which the City requests to be kept as confidential shall not be made available to any individual or
organization by the Contractor without prior written approval of the City.
19. Indemnity.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, the Contractor will defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City,
its elected and appointed officials, employees, and agents from and against any and all claims, damages,
losses, and expenses including attorneys' fees arising out of or resulting from the performance of the work,
provided that any such claim, damage, loss or expense (l) is attributable to bodily injury, sickness, disease,
or death, or to injury to or destruction of tangible property (other than the work itself) including the loss of
use resulting therefrom and (2) is caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission of contractor,
any subcontractor, anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of
them may be liable, regardless of whether or not it is caused in part by a party indemnified hereunder.
Such obligation shall not be construed to negate, abridge, or otherwise reduce any other right or obligation
of indemnity which would otherwise exist as to any party or person described in this paragraph.
20. Insurance.
Contractor shall provide, at its sole expense, and maintain during the term of this agreement commercial
general liability insurance with a reputable, qualified, and financially sound company licensed to do
business in the State of Missouri, and unless otherwise approved by the City, with a rating by Best of not
less than "A," that shall protect the Contractor, the City, and the City's officials, officers, and employees
from claims which may arise from operations under this agreement, whether such operations are by the
Contractor, its officers, directors, employees and agents, or any subcontractors of Contractor. This liability
insurance shall include, but shall not be limited to, protection against claims arising from bodily and
personal injury and damage to property, resulting from all Contractor operations, products, services or use
of automobiles, or construction equipment at a limit of $500,000 Each Occurrence, $3,000,000 Annual
Aggregate; provided that nothing herein shall be deemed a waiver of the City's sovereign immunity. An
endorsement shall be provided which states that the City is named as an additional insured and stating that
the policy shall not be cancelled or materially modified so as to be out of compliance with the requirements
of this section, or not renewed without 30 days advance written notice of such event being given to the City.
21. Documents.
Reproducible copies of tracings and maps prepared or obtained under the terms of this contract shall be
delivered upon request to and become the property of the City upon termination or completion of work.
Copies of basic survey notes and sketches, charts, computations and other data prepared or obtained under
this contract shall be made available, upon request, to the City without restrictions or limitations an their
use. When such copies are requested, the City agrees to pay the Contractor its costs of copying and
delivering same.
22. Books and Records.
The Contractor and all subcontractors shall maintain all books, documents, papers, accounting records and
other evidence pertaining to costs incurred in connection with this contract, and shall make such materials
available at their respective offices at all reasonable times during the contract and for a period of three (3)
years following completion of the contract.
23. Noosolicitation.
The Contractor warrants that they have not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona
fide employee working solely for the Contractor, to solicit or secure this contract, and that they have not
5
paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the
Contractor, any fee, commission. percentage, brokerage fee, gifts, or any other consideration, contingent
upon or resulting from the award or making of this contract. For breach or violation of this warranty, the
City shall have the right to annul this contract without liability, or, in its discretion, to deduct from the
contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage,
brokerage fee, gifts, or contingent fee.
24. Delays.
That the Contractor shall not be liable for delays resulting from causes beyond the reasonable control of the
Contractor; that the Contractor has made no warranties, expressed or implied, which are not expressly set
forth in this contract; and that under no circumstances will the Contractor be liable for indirect or
consequential damages.
25. Amendments.
This contract may not be modified, changed or altered by any oral promise or statement by whosoever
made; nor shall any modification of it be binding upon the City until such written modification shall have
been approved in writing by an authorized officer of the City. Contractor acknowledges that the City may
not be responsible for paying for changes or modifications that were not properly authorized.
26. Governing Law.
The contract shall be governed by the laws of the State of Missouri. The courts of the State of Missouri
shall have jurisdiction over any dispute which arises under this contract, and each of the parties shall submit
and hereby consents to such courts exercise of jurisdiction. In any successful action by the City to enforce
this contract, the City shall be entitled to recover its attorney's fees and expenses incurred in such action.
27. Federal Funds to be Used.
The City of Jefferson is a recipient of federal grant funds. Therefore, the grant requirements in Exhibit B
shall be fully considered in preparing responses and performing work under any resulting award.
28. Notices.
All notices required or permitted hereinunder and required to be in writing may be given by first class mail
addressed to the following addresses. The date and delivery of any notice shall be the date falling on the
second full day after the day of its mailing.
If to the City:
City ofiefferson
Department of Law
320 East McCarty Street
Jefferson City, Missouri, 65101
If to the Contractor:
David L. Taylor
19 Cherry Alley
Brookville, PA 15825
[Signatures to Follow on Next Page]
6
CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI
Carrie Tergin. 1Aaor
ATT}BSI:
APPROVED AS FO FORM:
City Anorq
DAVID L. TAYLOR
ATTEST:
Exhibit A
DAVID L TAILOR
Historic Preservation Consultant
19 Cherry Alley
Brookville, PA 15825
814-6411.49011
tta.dati id'u gmail.1.4o
November 22, 2021
Office of the Purchasing Agent
City of Jefferson
320 East McCarty Street
Jefferson City, MO 65101
RE: Request for Proposals: Historic Preservation Consultant
To Whom It May Concern:
Thank you so much for sending me the Request for Proposals far the above -captioned project. I am pleased to submit this
Proposal to the City of Jefferson undertake two of the three elements set forth in the RFP, namely, surveys of the East Side and of the
West Main Street Survey Areas, consisting of approximately 750 historic resources within the City. Although I am from Pennsylvania,
my work encompasses much of the Eastern and Midwestern United States, including previous survey and National Register work in
the Missouri communities of Joplin, Cuba, Moberly, and Ferguson.
l offer to the City of Jefferson and to its historic preservation advocates more than thirty years of professional experience in
historic preservation planning and administration including:
o Professional qualifications under 36CFR61 approved by the State Historic Preservation Offices of Missouri,
North Carolina, Kentucky, West Virginia, Connecticut, Pennsylvania, New York, Maryland, Ohio, and Indiana
o Prior service with the Ohio Historic Preservation Office
o Many years of consultant services to communities large and small, rural and urban, undertaking myriad
historic resource surveys and more than 100 National Register of Historic Places nominations; a selected
list of representative projects and National Register nominations is included herewith
o Proven writing skills evidenced by the attached writing sample as well as numerous publications in profes-
sional publications.
o Former Chairman of the Pennsylvania State Historic Preservation Board and President of Preservation Penn-
sylvania
o Six years as a municipal manager
o Award -winning Main Street Project Manager
o Broad range of public speaking abilities to groups of varying sixes
Scope of Services
The following Scope of Services is proposed for this project. Additional elements may be added or modifications may be
made as needed.
• On -site visits and extensive local history research, meeting(s) with City representatives, members of the Historic
Preservation Commission, and others associated with the project, including, as applicable, representatives of the
Missouri State Historic Preservation Office.
• Completion of approximately 750 Missouri SHPO Architectural/Historic tnventary Forms for buildings within the pro-
ject areas, including in-depth local history research and the preparation of architectural descriptions, statements of
significance, evaluations as to the historic character of each, etc., and photography.
• Evaluation of the surveyed properties as to their potential eligibility for listing in the National Register of Historic
Places, as local landmarks, or as part of locally -designated historic districts; identification of architectural features,
themes, design characteristics, etc. that could lead to the development of local historic districts or as part of a Na-
tional Register Multiple Property Documentation Form.
• Preparation of a map illustrating the survey area and surveyed resources
• Delivery of a Survey Report summarizing the results of the survey, setting forth the survey methodology, detailing
the results of the survey and including a bibliography of sources consulted in the course of the project as well as any
recommendations; pertinent information from the 2022 Comprehensive Plan will be integrated into the Report.
• Participation in and facilitation of two public informational meetings in each survey area to explain the survey, to
gather information, and to present the results of the initiative; the Consultant will prepare press releases for each
event.
• At times when he is in Jefferson City in the course of the project, the Consultant will be available to speak with local
groups about the project, to participate in media talk shows, if appropriate, etc.
• All aspects of the work will conform to relevant survey and National Register requirements of the National Park
Service and of the Missouri State Historic Preservation Office, including all reporting, mapping, properly -formatted
and -sized photography, etc.
Assuming the issuance of a Notice to Proceed on or about January 1, 2022, a project starting date of January 5, 2022 is
envisioned. Site visits, the initial public meeting, initiation of local history research, photography, etc. will take place shortly thereafter.
It is proposed that draft inventory forms will be submitted by April 15, 2022, that the second public meeting will occur shortly there-
after, that final inventory forms will be submitted by June15, 2022, and that all work will be completed by July 15, 2022. It should be
acknowledged that this schedule is dependent not only on the Consultant's timely performance, but also upon the review of all ma-
terials and their return to the Consultant for any needed revisions.
Included with this document are letters of reference, a current resume, a narrative setting forth a selection of projects that I
have undertaken, and visuals from similar projects. As writing samples, I am also including a copy of the recently -listed National
Register historic district nomination for the Graham -Davis Historic District in Elkins, West Virginia, as well as representative survey
forms. Attachments A -E are included as the concluding pages of this Proposal.
It is proposed that all aspects of this project will be completed for the following fixed fees of $12,750.00 for each of the two
survey areas, for a total of $25,500.00, including all professional time, travel, project -related expenses, etc. Work on each project will
take place concurrently. It is suggested that the following schedule be incorporated into a Contract:
Initial Payment: $10,000.00, following the submittal of Research Designs to the City and to the SHPO, initial recon-
naissance site visit to the survey areas and the initiation of local history research, the first public
meetings, photography, meetings with the representatives of the City, and the delivery of digital
media containing all images
Progress Payment No. 1: $10,000.00, upon the submittal of the first 400 inventory forms
Progress Payment No, 2: $5,000.00, following the remaining inventory forms and the draft Survey Report, the second public
meeting and upon the final approval of all materials by the City and by the State Historic Preserva-
tion Office
Final Payment: $500.00 upon the approval of all project materials by the City and the SHPO
I would welcome the opportunity to discuss any aspect of this Proposal, to participate in an interview, or to speak with a
selection committee if that will assist with the selection process.
Thank you again and I will look forward to hearing from you.
Sincerely,
David L. Taylor
ATTACHMENT A — COST FORM
Costs Related to the Historic East Side Survey
Itemized Expenditure
Cost
Reconnaissance site Visit meetin¢s with Ci Frnr n�ihlir mrrfin�_�hotngra; hr_ initiation
of local history research, delivery of digital media with all images, Research Design
,
$5,000.00
Delivery of first half of draft survey forms
$5,000.00
Delivery of remaining survey forms and draft Survey Report
$2,500.00 ,
Approval of all project materials by the City and by the SIIPO
$?50;00
Total Cost -- Historic East Survey
S]2,750.00
Costs Related to the Historic West Main, Lower Jefferson, Waterworks Complex Survey
Itemized Expenditure
Cost
Reconnaissance site visit, meetings with City, first public meeting, photography. initiation
of local history -research, delivery of digital media with all images, Research Design
$5,000.00
flrtivery of I ref half of pir.ey Frwa s
$5,000.00
Delivery of remaining survey forts and draft Survey Report
$2,500.00
Approval of ail materials by the City and by the SHPO
5250.00
Total Cost -- Historic East Survey
512,750,00
ITEM 3
Costs Related to the Historic Context Study
Itemized Expenditure
Cost
NO BID FOR THIS COMPONENT
-0-
Total Cost — Historic East Surv_y
24
EXHIBIT B
FEDERAL TERMS
Byrd Anti -Lobbying Amendment (31 U.S.C. 1352)
Each contractor certifies to the tier above by completing the Certification Regarding Lobbying
form, that it will not and has not used Federal appropriated funds to pay any person or
organization for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of
an agency, a member of Congress, officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a member
of Congress in connection with obtaining any Federal contract, grant or any other award covered
by 31 U.S.C. 1352. Each tier must also disclose any lobbying with non -Federal funds that takes
place in connection with obtaining any Federal award.
Debarment and Suspension (Executive Orders 12549 and 12689)
A contract award will not be made to parties listed on the government wide exclusions in the
System for Award Management (SAM), in accordance with the OMB guidelines, 2 CFR 180.
SAM exclusions contain the names of parties debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded by
agencies as well as parties declared ineligible under statutory or regulatory authority other than
Executive Order 12549.
Procurement of Recovered Materials
The contractor must comply with section 6002 of the Solid Waste Disposal Acts as amended by
the Resources Conservation and Recovery Act. The requirements of this section include
procuring only items designated in guidelines of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) at
40 CFR part 247 that contain the highest percentage of recovered materials practicable,
consistent with maintaining a satisfactory level of competition, where the purchase price of the
item exceeds $10,000 or the value of the quantity acquired during the preceding fiscal year
exceeded $10,000; procuring solid waste management services in a manner that maximizes
energy and resource recovery; and establishing an affirmative procurement program for
procurement of recovered materials identified in the EPA guidelines.
Termination
1. Termination for Cause. The City may terminate this agreement, in whole or in part, at any
time before the date of completion whenever it is determined that the contractor has failed to
comply with the terms and conditions of the agreement. The City shall promptly notify the
contractor in writing of such a determination and the reasons for the termination, together
with the effective date. The City reserves the right to withhold all or a portion of funds if the
contractor violates any term or condition of this agreement. Termination for cause may be
considered for evaluating future agreements. The contractor may object to terminations with
cause and may provide information and documentation challenging the termination.
2. Termination for Convenience. Both the City and the contractor may terminate the agreement,
in whole or in part, when both parties agree that the continuation of the project would not
produce beneficial results commensurate with the further expenditure of funds.
3. The City reserves the right to terminate the contract at any time, for the convenience of the
City, without penalty or recourse, by giving written notice to the contractor at least thirty (30)
calendar days prior to the effective date of such termination. The contractor shall be entitled
to receive compensation for services and/or supplies delivered to and accepted by the City
pursuant to the contract prior to the effective date of termination.
Owen & Eastlake Ltd.
1356 Hamlet Street
Columbus, Ohio 43201
November 22, 2021
Leigh Ann Corrigan
Office of the Purchasing Agent
320 E. McCarty St.
Jefferson City, Missouri 65101
Dear Ms. Corrigan:
Owen & Eastlake is pleased to submit our proposal for the City of Jefferson Historic context. We
are a historic preservation firm located in Columbus, Ohio, that specializes in history and
architectural history.
We have written extensive historic contexts for our National Register nominations and Multiple
Property documents. Our historic district nomination are often for under-served and under-
represented communities. As such we are familiar with development patterns associated with
home loan redlining, restrictive covenants and exclusionary zoning practices. Our civil rights
Multiple Property Document included property types and registration guidelines to aid
evaluation and future nominations. The MPD also placed the integrity of extant resources in
context by listing lost historic resources. Our MPD is currently being used as a basis for a civil
rights trail in Cleveland while Heritage Ohio is making statewide civil rights trail.
We are also familiar with historic and post-World War II housing, development patterns and
themes to be able to fully describe and explain the built environment.
Owen & Eastlake is also experienced in leading public meetings for surveys. We will produce
the historic context with the City Jefferson’s recent historic preservation planning efforts in
mind.
Should you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me at
rkrupp@oweneastlake.com or 614-439-9068.
Sincerely,
Rory Krupp
Principal
Executive Summary
Jefferson City, Missouri, received a Historic Preservation Fund grant from the National Park
Service, Department of the Interior, and the Missouri Department of Natural Resources, State
Historic Preservation Office. Owen & Eastlake herein submits a proposal for a historic context in
Jefferson City, Missouri. The historic context will provide planners and citizens with a means to
identify and evaluate historic properties in Jefferson City. The historic context will examine land
use patterns, historic zoning, planning, and exclusionary practices to present a complete history
of Jefferson City’s built environment. A chapter will be dedicated to the processes that allowed
racial segregation. The historic context will also be accessible and usable to the general public.
The report will include proposed National Register nominations for sites and districts.
Firm Qualifications
Owen & Eastlake Ltd. was founded in August 2012 in Columbus, Ohio, by principal Rory
Krupp. Owen & Eastlake specializes in history and architectural history. The firm prepares
National Register documentation for municipalities, community groups, state preservation
offices, and local historical societies. The firm also conducts reconnaissance and intensive
architectural surveys and Section 106 compliance activities.
Owen & Eastlake is experienced in identifying National Register sites and districts. We have
prepared a statewide National Register Multiple Property Document that identified potential
National Register sites and formulated new registration guidelines and site types for use in
evaluating future sites. The firm has also prepared successful National Register nominations for
both historic districts and individual properties.
All members of the Owen & Eastlake team meet the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for
history and architectural history.
Related Project Experience
Twentieth-Century African American Civil Rights in Ohio, 1900–1970. National Register
Multiple Property Document Form, Ohio statewide context, 2019
The Twentieth-Century African American Civil Rights in Ohio National Register Multiple
Property Documentation form examines four themes in Ohio civil rights history: public
accommodations, employment, education, and police brutality. Owen & Eastlake conducted field
work and interviews to locate sites within these themes. National and local civil rights
organizations archives, African American newspapers, the Negro Motorist Green Book, and civil
rights narratives were examined in both large urban areas and rural Ohio. Close attention was
paid to intra-state responses and responses over time to ascertain differences in how different
communities reacted to civil rights violations and subsequent actions. Special emphasis was
placed on recent movements such as Black Power and Black Economic Empowerment.
Owen & Eastlake conducted two community outreach meetings in Columbus and Cincinnati.
The team also visited smaller towns throughout Ohio and met with community members to hear
their civil rights stories and visit the associated sites. We visited approximately 90 sites to
evaluate historic integrity and establish registration guidelines.
The MPDF was written for the Ohio Historic State Preservation Office. It was funded by the
National Park Service, Department of the Interior, African American Civil Rights Grants
program. The project was conducted from October 2017 to December 2018. The MPDF
unanimously passed its review by the Ohio State Historic Site Preservation Advisory Board on
December 7, 2018. The MPDF was listed in the National Register of Historic Places in June
2019.
Dennison-McMillen Architectural Survey and Local Historic District Nomination,
Columbus, Ohio, 2019
Owen & Eastlake conducted a combination reconnaissance and intensive architectural survey for
the Dennison-McMillen Historic District Steering Committee. A Certified Local Government
grant partially funded an architectural survey that recorded 250 resources on Ohio Historic
Inventory forms. Inventoried resources included historic homes, churches, schools, and infill
apartments ranging in construction date from 1875 to 1984, giving a full range of the area’s
properties. Owen & Eastlake also conducted three community meetings.
The survey report was researched and written according to Guidelines for Conducting
History/Architecture Surveys in Ohio.
Depot District and Old Town Neighborhood Reconnaissance Survey, City of Kirksville,
Missouri, 2020
Owen & Eastlake conducted a reconnaissance architectural survey of 294 historic resources in
Kirksville, Missouri in 2021. A mix of commercial buildings and residential homes the historic
resources ranged from the 1870s to early 2000s. A survey report and 294 Missouri architectural
inventory forms were produced. Owen & Eastlake conducted two public meetings in Kirksville’s
City Hall. The survey also resulted in a proposed National Register district with a transportation
theme.
Memorial Park and Old Town East Neighborhoods Reconnaissance Survey, Kirksville,
Missouri, 2021
In 2021, Owen & Eastlake survey 301 properties for the City of Kirksville. The survey area was
largely residential properties ranging from the 1870’s to the modern day. The survey area also
included a historic park that was a Civil War battle site. The survey resulted in 301 Missouri
architectural survey forms and one proposed National Register historic district.
Project Approach
Owen & Eastlake conducts original research for its historic contexts using primary documents
and secondary sources. We do not boilerplate previous research.
Owen & Eastlake maintains a Friends of the Library membership at the Ohio State University, a
major research institution; a JSTOR membership for access to the latest scholarly articles; and
memberships in newspaper and genealogical databases. All these resources will be used as
appropriate for this project’s historic research. Local libraries and historical societies will be used
for local research, including consultation with local historians and the interested public as
needed.
Historic context Methodology
Owen & Eastlake will begin research to identify themes and land use patterns to examine
Jefferson City’s built environment. Owen & Eastlake will utilize previous planning documents,
newspapers, archival sources and secondary documents to identify themes. Using the identified
themes we will identify building types and integrity to allow planners and citizens to identify and
evaluate historic resources.
Public Notification
Owen & Eastlake will conduct an initial public meeting to elicit material and inform the public
about the historic context’s goals and outcomes.
Project Staff
The project will be managed from the Columbus, Ohio office. The firm’s principal, Rory Krupp,
will manage the project both in the field and the office. He will also conduct the preliminary
archival research in Jefferson City, Missouri, and produce the documentation for the public
meeting.
Krupp will collaborate with Roy Hampton to write the research design.
Krupp and Hampton will write the historic context, and Hampton will write the architectural
descriptions and key neighborhood architectural descriptions.
The team will share the photography and mapping work.
Summary of Project Staff Experience
The project staff has completed six successful individual National Register nominations,
including one that was listed with national significance. Owen & Eastlake has also conducted the
research and preparation of a nationally significant mid-century modern National Register
historic district.
Owen & Eastlake has completed five large survey projects, including a state-wide Multiple
Property Document Form, Twentieth-Century African American Civil Rights in Ohio, 1900–
1970: Evaluating and Nominating Historic Properties. Owen & Eastlake completed two
reconnaissance architectural surveys in Kirksville, Missouri funded through a NPS Historic
Preservation Fund grant. Additional survey projects include the Asheville African American
Heritage Survey and the Dennison-McMillen Architectural Reconnaissance Survey. All survey
projects included historic contexts.
As key personnel for another firm, Krupp and Hampton worked together on the Cleveland
Innerbelt Architectural Survey and a survey of the Naval Station Great Lakes in Chicago. They
also conducted archival research in support of an archaeological excavation of the Union Village
Shaker site in Lebanon, Ohio, which resulted in a monograph series for the Ohio Department of
Transportation.
Project Schedule
Process or Product Projected Due Date
Meet with HPF grant manager and City to
discuss level of documentation.
February 10, 2021
Begin preliminary research in Jefferson City
(this immediately follows meeting with HPF
grant manager and City). Complete five
survey forms for review.
February 20, 2021
Submit research design to HPF grant
manager. Submit documentation for first
public meeting.
March 6, 2021
Hold public meeting. TBD
Submit final research design. March 31, 2021
Submit historic context report. Submit
documentation for final public meeting.
June 22, 2021
Submit final project report and invoice. August 31, 2021
Fee Schedule
Owen & Eastlake will complete the tasks in this proposal for a flat fee of $42,500.
Bidder’s Authorized Contact
Owen & Eastlake Ltd. is committed to the completion of the project according to the enclosed
schedule and fee proposal. The proposal will be valid for 90 days from the submittal date. The
undersigned has the authority to commit Owens & Eastlake to the contract.
___________________________________
Rory Krupp, Principal
Owen & Eastlake Ltd.
References
Barbara A. Powers
Department Head, Inventory and Registration
Ohio State Historic Preservation Office
800 E. 17th Avenue
Columbus, Ohio 43211
614.289.2000
bpowers@ohiohistory.org
Project: National Register Multiple Property Documentation Form, Twentieth-Century African
American Civil Rights in Ohio, 1900-1970.
Ashley Young
Assistant City Manager
Community and Economic Development Department
City of Kirksville
201 South Franklin Street
Kirksville, Missouri 63501
660.627.1224
ayoung@kirksvillecity.com
Projects:
Susan Keeney
Dennison-McMillen Historic District Steering Committee
358 King Avenue
Columbus, Ohio 43201
937-479-0201
slmkeeny@hotmail.com
Project contact for the Dennison-McMillen Architectural Survey
Resumes
Rory Krupp
Education
Masters of Arts with distinction; American history with a Certificate in Historic Preservation;
University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio; 2012.
Bachelor of Arts; Major in Ancient History and Classics; Minor in Anthropology with an
emphasis in prehistoric North American archaeology; The Ohio State University, Columbus,
Ohio; 1994.
Certifications and Training
Meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards for history and
architectural history. Pre-qualified architectural historian and historian in Ohio, Indiana,
Pennsylvania, Michigan and South Dakota. Pre-qualified for archaeology in Nebraska and
Oklahoma.
Ohio Department of Transportation Section 106 training, September 2016
National Historic Landmark program webinars, Writing Section 8 for Criteria 1 & 2; NHL Nuts
and Bolts; National Register or National Historic Landmark; Understanding Cultural
Landscapes; Writing Section 8: Archaeology, and Writing Section 8 for Criterion 4: Architecture;
Preparing for the Landmarks Committee.
Professional Experience
Owen & Eastlake Ltd, Columbus, Ohio Principal
August 2012-present
• Principal of historic preservation consulting firm specializing in the architectural history
services, National Register nominations, historic tax credit documentation and Section
106 documentation.
• Researched and co-wrote the National Register nomination for the nationally significant
Hanford Village George Washington Carver Addition Historic District in Columbus,
Ohio.
Hardlines Design Company Inc., Columbus, Ohio Historian
June 2012
• Researched and wrote report chapter that examined Zoar Village and its connection to
modern regional and international art movements for the Zoar Baseline Study for the
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Huntington District, Huntington, West Virginia.
University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio Graduate Teaching Assistant
Dept. of History Sept. 2010-June 2012
• Graded papers and exams for American and Latin American survey history classes
• Taught six recitation sections of American history at the undergraduate level
• Created classroom materials and presentations for recitation sections.
Hardlines Design Company Inc., Columbus, Ohio Archaeologist/Historian
Oct. 2009-Sept. 2010
• Researched and wrote five Historic Property Management Plans for United States Army
Corps of Engineers, Huntington District of the London, Bellville, Racine, Marmet, and
Robert C. Byrd Locks and Dams, Ohio and Kanawha Rivers navigation pools flowage
easement areas.
• Developed a prehistoric and historic contexts for the project area including a history of
mining activities and other mineral extraction industries in West Virginia and
southeastern Ohio
• Researched and collected information about all previously recorded prehistoric and
historic archaeological sites and historic properties in the project area. Summarized
National Register nominations, archaeological site files and architectural inventories for
the management plan.
• Designed prehistoric and historic site predictive models.
• Developed preservation plans for cultural resources in accordance with Section 110 of the
National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 as amended.
• Recommended treatment plans and management priorities for archaeological sites and
historic properties within the project area.
• Consulted with preservation professionals concerning latest best practices for
archaeological site and historic property preservation on Department of Defense lands.
Hardlines Design Company Inc., Columbus, Ohio Archaeologist/Historian
May 2005-February 2007
• Co-author of the North Family Lot site monograph series. Participated in a Phase III
excavation of the main family house, broom shop, and pottery workshops at a historic
Shaker site; the North Family Lot, Union Village, in Lebanon, Ohio under the direction of
Andrew Sewell. Conducted primary archival using dairies and daybooks and secondary
source research for Phase III Union Village Shaker
• Wr ote social and economic histories of Union Village Shaker settlement for Phase III
monograph series for the Ohio Department Transportation.
• Researched and wrote a historic context for Cleveland Innerbelt Expansion Project Phase
II history-architecture survey for Gray & Pape, Inc. for the Ohio Department of
Transportation with a focus on heavy industry and immigration.
• Researched and wrote Historic American Engineering Report historic context for
Campbell Avenue, Cambridge, Ohio, bridge replacement project with a focus on
changing bridge technologies and designs.
• Participated in Phase II excavation on an early 19th century historic farmstead in Prince
George's County, Maryland under the direction of Andrew Sewell.
• Accessioned and created database of historic construction photographs of Emsworth,
Dashields and Montgomery Locks and Dams for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
Pittsburgh District.
• Assisted in the preparation of Historic American Building Survey documentation.
Presentations
“Fervor and Fashion: How the Frontier West Changed Shaker Design” Queen City Colloquium,
University of Cincinnati, May 18, 2012
Peer-Reviewed Publications
Krupp, Rory
2020
“New Deal, New Serpent: Public Works Projects at the Serpent Mound State Memorial”
Journal of Ohio Archaeology.
Archaeological, Architecture, History Reports and National Register Nominations
Krupp, Rory and Roy Hampton
2021 Phase II Reconnaissance Survey for the Memorial Park and Old Town Neighborhoods,
Prepared for the City of Kirksville, Missouri, Department of Engineering and the
Missouri State Historic Preservation Office.
Krupp, Rory and Roy Hampton
2020 Phase I Reconnaissance Survey for the Depot District and Old Town Neighborhoods,
Prepared for the City of Kirksville, Missouri, Department of Engineering and the
Missouri State Historic Preservation Office.
Krupp, Rory and Roy Hampton
2019 National Register of Historic Places amended nomination for the Chestnut Baptist/Quinn
Chapel A.M.E. Church prepared for the City of Louisville, Kentucky. Listed May, 2020
Krupp, Rory and Roy Hampton
2019 African American Heritage Survey, Prepared for the City of Asheville, Department of
Planning and Urban Design, Asheville, North Carolina.
Krupp, Rory and Roy Hampton
2019 McMillen-Dennison Proposed Historic District Architectural Survey, Prepared for the
McMillen-Dennison Historic District Steering Committee and the Short North Society,
Columbus, Ohio
Krupp, Rory and Roy Hampton
2018 National Register of Historic Places nomination for the Eugene McKinley Memorial
Pool, Portsmouth, Ohio. Prepared for the Ohio State Historic Preservation Office, Funded
by the National Park Service. Listed in 2018.
Krupp, Rory and Roy Hampton
2018 Manse Hotel and Annex Local Designation Report. Prepared for the City of Cincinnati
Historic Conservation Board. Funded by the Model Group.
Krupp, Rory and Roy Hampton, Charles Casey-Leininger
2018 National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Document Form,
Twentieth-Century African American Civil Rights in Ohio. Prepared for the Ohio State
Historic Preservation Office. Funded by the National Park Service.
Krupp, Rory and Roy Hampton
2017 National Register of Historic Places nomination for The Edna Building, Franklin County,
Columbus, Ohio. Prepared for Tim Lai ArchitecT. Funded by the Ohio Development
Services Agency Ohio Historic Tax Credit Pipeline Initiative.
Krupp, Rory and Roy Hampton
2016 National Register of Historic Places nomination for the Franklin Park
Medical Center, Franklin County, Columbus, Ohio. Prepared by Owen &
Eastlake Ltd. for the Columbus Landmarks Foundation. Funded by the
Ohio Development Services Agency Ohio Historic Tax Credit Pipeline
Initiative.
Krupp, Rory and Roy Hampton
2014 National Register of Historic Places nomination for the Theresa Building,
Franklin County, Columbus, Ohio. Prepared by Owen & Eastlake Ltd. for
the Columbus Landmarks Foundation. Funded by the Ohio Development
Services Agency Ohio Historic Tax Credit Pipeline Initiative.
Krupp, Rory and Roy Hampton
2013 National Register of Historic Places nomination for the Hanford
Village George Washington Carver Addition Historic District, Franklin
County, Ohio. Prepared by Owen & Eastlake Ltd for the Columbus
Landmarks Foundation in conjunction with the African American
history initiative.
Sewell, Andrew R, Christine Trebellas, Anne B. Lee, Ben Riggle, and Rory Krupp
2013 Baseline Planning Assessments for Zoar Levee and Diversion Dam,
Dam Modification Study, Historic Property Baseline Study,
Lawrence Township, Tuscawaras County, Ohio. Prepared by
Hardlines Design Company. Submitted to the United States Army
Corps of Engineers, Huntington District.
Krupp, Rory
2012 “Zoar Village and the Arts” in Baseline Planning Assessments for the Zoar
Levee & Diversion Dam, Dam Safety and Modification Study,
Tuscarawaras County, Ohio. Hardlines Design Company, Submitted
to the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Huntington District,
Huntington, West Virginia
Krupp, Rory
2010 Historic Properties Management Plan for the Belleville Locks and
Dam, London, West Virginia. Hardlines Design Company.
Submitted to the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Huntington District
2010 Historic Properties Management Plan for the Racine Locks and Dam, West Virginia.
Hardlines Design Company. Submitted to the United States Army Corps of Engineers,
Huntington District
2010 Historic Properties Management Plan for the Marmet Locks and
Dam, Marmet, West Virginia. Hardlines Design Company.
Submitted to the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Huntington District
2010 Historic Properties Management Plan for the Robert C. Byrd Locks and
Dam, Gallipolis Ferry, West Virginia. Hardlines Design Company.
Submitted to the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Huntington District
2009 Historic Properties Management Plan for the London Locks and
Dam, London, West Virginia. Hardlines Design Company.
Submitted to the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Huntington District.
Sewell, Andrew., Roy A. Hampton, and Rory Krupp
2009 Encountering the Shakers of the North Family Lot, Volume 2: A Clean
and Lively Appearance-- The Landscape and Architecture of the North
Family Lot. Hardlines Design Company Inc., Columbus, Ohio. Submitted
to the Ohio Department of Transportation. Columbus, Ohio
Sewell, Andrew., Roy A. Hampton, and Rory Krupp
2009 Encountering the Shakers of the North Family Lot, Volume 3: Tracing
Prosperity and Adversity-- A Social History of the North Family Lot.
Hardlines Design Company Inc., Columbus, Ohio. Submitted to
the Ohio Department of Transportation. Columbus, Ohio
Hampton, Roy., Heather Kennedy, and Rory Krupp
2008 Phase I Building Survey at Naval Station Great Lakes, Lake County,
llinois, Vol 2 of 4. Hardlines Design Company Columbus, Ohio
Submitted to Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Midwest. Great Lakes, Illinois.
Krupp, Rory., Roy Hampton, and Heather Kenney
2006 Historic Context for History Architecture Survey for the Cleveland Innerbelt Phase II,
Cuyahoga County, Ohio (CUY-Innerbelt, PID 77510) Hardlines Design Company,
Columbus, Ohio for Gray & Pape, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Hampton, Roy., Heather Kenney, and Rory Krupp
2006 Historic American Engineering Record Documentation of the Campbell
Avenue Bridge. Cambridge, Guernsey County. Ohio. Hardlines Design Company Inc.,
Columbus, Ohio.
Hampton, Roy., Heather Kenney, and Rory Krupp
2006 Phase II History/Architecture Survey Report for the A.G. Hibbs House
(FRA-8615) Hardlines Design Company Inc., Columbus, Ohio.
Hampton, Roy., Heather Kenney, and Rory Krupp
2006 Documentation of the Recovered Lock Materials, Monongahela
Navigation Company Lock and Dam No. 2. Hardlines Design
Company Submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Pittsburgh
District, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Pecora, Albert M., and Rory Krupp
1999 Phase I Cultural Resource Survey of the 1641 Vogel Avenue Housing
Project in the City of Columbus, Franklin County. Ohio. Ohio Valley
Archaeological Services Ltd. Columbus, Ohio.
Pecora, Albert M., and Rory Krupp
1999 Phase I Cultural Resource Survey Archaeological Survey of the
Incidental Boundary Revision for Coal Mine Permit D-0360, Washington
Township, Belmont County, Ohio. Ohio Vall ey Archaeological Services
Ltd. Columbus, Ohio. Submitted to the Ohio Department of Resources.
Pecora, Albert M., Jennifer A. Pederson, and Rory Krupp
1998 Phase I Cultural Resource Survey of the Proposed Temporary Road
Project (Mus-60 21.47), Falls Township, Muskingum County, Ohio (Pid
12137) Ohio Valley Archaeological Services Ltd. Columbus,
Ohio. Submitted to Ohio Department of Transportation.
Pecora, Albert M., and Rory Krupp
1998 Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Proposed Adjacent Permit Area
Application D-0424-2, Section 17, German Township, Harrison County,
Ohio. Ohio Valley Archaeological Services Ltd. Columbus,
Ohio. Submitted to the Ohio Department of Natural Resources.
Pecora, Albert M., and Rory Krupp
1998 Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Proposed Coal Mine Permit
Application #1450, Section 11, Cadiz Township, Harrison County, Ohio.
Ohio Valley Archaeological Services Ltd. Columbus, Ohio. Submitted to
the Ohio Department of Natural Resources.
Pecora, Albert M., and Rory Krupp
1998 Phase I Archaeological Survey of the Proposed Adjacent Area Permit
Application D-1059-2, Warren Township, Belmont County, Ohio.
Ohio Valley Archaeological Services Ltd., Columbus, Ohio. Submitted to
the Ohio Department of Natural Resources.
Krupp, Rory
1993 Archaeological Reconnaissance of the Coal Prospecting Operations in
the Mud River and Big Ugly Watersheds in Lincoln and Boone Counties,
West Virginia. Duvall and Associates, Franklin, Tennessee.
Krupp, Rory
1993 Archaeological Reconnaissance of the Pen Coal Company's Kiah Creek Permit Area
Wayne County, West Virginia. Duvall and Associates, Franklin, Tennessee.
Krupp, Rory
Phase IV Data Recovery Survey at 33FR883, An Upland Lithic Scatter 1993
Along Hayden Run in Washington Township, Franklin County, Ohio.
Archaeological Services Consultants, Inc. Columbus, Ohio. Submitted to
The Ohio Public Utilities Commission and Columbia Gas of Ohio.
Church, Flora., Annette Erickson, Bryan Lee, and Rory Krupp
1992 Mitigation of 33FR756 and 33FR760: Two Prehistoric Sites West of the
Scioto River in Franklin County, Ohio. Archaeological Services
Consultants. Columbus, Ohio. Submitted to M/I Schottenstein Homes,
Inc. Columbus, Ohio.
Nass, John P. Jr., John R. Wright, Lori Frye, and Rory Krupp
1992 Phase I Historic Properties Investigations, Youghiogheny River Lake
Project, Fayette and Somerset Counties, Pennsylvania and Garret
County, Maryland. Archaeological Services Consultants, Inc. Columbus.
Ohio. Submitted to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Pittsburgh District.
Wright, John R., Rory Krupp, and Chris McClaren.
1991 Assessment Survey: Site 33TU391 in the Proposed Limestone Company
Mining Tract #D-0796 Archaeological Services Consultants, Inc.
Columbus. Ohio. Submitted to Buckeye Services, New Philadelphia,
Ohio.
Wright, John R., and Rory Krupp
1990 Assessment Survey: Sites 33VI355 and 33VI356 in the Proposed
Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion, Village of McAuthur, Elk
Township, Vinton County, Ohio. Archaeological Services Consultants, Inc.
Columbus. Ohio. Submitted to the Ohio Environmental Agency and
Burgess and Niple. Columbus, Ohio.
Sprague, Rae Norris, Robert Corso, and Rory Krupp
1989 Literature Review and Reconnaissance Survey of the Proposed East
Muskingum Sewer Easement, Washington, Wayne, and Perry Townships,
Muskingum County, Ohio. Archaeological Services Consultants, Inc.
Columbus. Ohio. Submitted to the Muskingum County Sanitary
Engineering Department, Zanesville, Ohio.
Sprague, Rae Norris, and Rory Krupp
1989 Literature Review and Reconnaissance Survey: Valley Mining Tract
#D-0740-2, Smithfield Township, Jefferson County, Ohio. Archaeological
Services Consultants Inc. Columbus, Ohio. Submitted to the Ohio
Department of Natural Resources, Columbus, Ohio.
Professional Affiliations
Organization of American Historians
American Historical Association
Midwest Archaeological Conference
Roy A. Hampton
CAREER PROFILE
Experienced architectural historian and cultural resources management professional with
extensive work in research and writing related to Ohio history and architecture. Author of several
National Register historic district nominations and over 100 National Register eligibility studies
of bridges, dams, landscapes, buildings, and neighborhoods. Also experienced with historic
preservation plans, historic structures reports, and HABS/HAER documentation.
• Co-author of successful National Register district nomination of Rockefeller Park and the
Cleveland Cultural Gardens
• Listed the Village of Gambier Historic District (Knox County, Ohio) in the National Register
• Author or co-author of over 200 Ohio Historic Inventory forms
• Completed ODOT inventory and evaluation projects dealing with historic districts and
individual properties in Columbus and Franklin County
EDUCATION AND TRAINING
• B.A., History, Bellarmine University, Louisville, Kentucky
• M.A., History of Art, University of Louisville, Kentucky
• Ohio Department of Transportation 4-F Training, June 2011
• Ohio Department of Transportation Section 106 Training, March 2011
• National Preservation Institute’s Identification and Evaluation of Mid-Twentieth Century
Buildings Training, 2002
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
Senior Historian, Hardlines Design Company, Columbus, OH 1997-2012
• Researched federal HABS/HAER Collections, federal census data, and local government
archives, and inventory and cultural resource report collections of the Ohio Historic
Preservation Office
• Completed over 100 projects related to Ohio history and architecture for the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, the State of Ohio departments of
Transportation and Natural Resources, as well as the U.S. Forest Service
• Composed online guide to using Ohio Public Library Information Network Sanborn map
collection
• Co-authored several cultural resources management plans for historic military installations
including the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard (Maine), former Philadelphia Naval Shipyard, and
Naval Station Great Lakes, Illinois
Researcher, Louisville Development Authority, Louisville, Kentucky 1994-1995
• Researched deeds, maps, local histories, and government documents
• Managed public access to commission research files and reference library
• Authored National Register nomination for the Smoketown Historic District, for Louisville’s
oldest African-American neighborhood
• Completed additional National Register-related survey work in the Shelby Park neighborhood
PUBLICATIONS
• Co-author with Christine Trebellas, Historic Context Report for the Ohio Department of
Highways Bureau of Bridges, 1911-1945. Available at
www.state.oh.us/Divisions/Planning/Environment/Context Studies/ODOT Bureau of Bridges
Context 2012.
• Author, “Researching Your Property with Ohio Public Library Information Network Sanborn
Maps,” 2012 (prepared for Hardlines Design Company, Columbus, Ohio, available at
http//hardlinesdesign.com).
• Innovation on the Monongahela, The Construction of Braddock Dam, softcover booklet, U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, Pittsburgh District, 2008.
• Co-author with Maria Burkett, Aerospace Technology at Naval Weapons Industrial Reserve
Plant Bloomfield. U.S. Navy Facilities Engineering Command, Mid-Atlantic Division, 2008.
• Author, “German Gothic in the Midwest, the Church Architecture of Adolphus Druiding and
Franz Georg Himpler.” U.S Catholic Historian, May 1997.
SELECTED PROJECTS
Phase I and II Surveys for I-70/71, Columbus, Ohio. Assessed the National Register eligibility of
more than 400 buildings as part of a large highway interchange study. The project included
evaluation of buildings that had not been previously surveyed, plus identification and
reassessment of contributing and non-contributing properties in several National Register and
City of Columbus local historic districts.
National Register District Nomination, Rockefeller Park and the Cleveland Cultural Gardens,
Cuyahoga County, Ohio. Co-authored a National Register district nomination covering
Rockefeller Park, a major urban park space that is an excellent example of the Victorian
Picturesque landscape style. The nomination also included the Cleveland Cultural Gardens, a
series of landscapes within the park that commemorate Cleveland’s ethnic diversity. The district
was successfully listed in the National Register in 2005.
National Register Nomination, Village of Gambier, Knox County, Ohio. Surveyed over 150
buildings in the Village of Gambier and listed the village in the National Register of Historic
Places. The new Gambier historic district included the village’s significant commercial and
residential properties as well as an existing National Register historic district covering the
Kenyon College campus.
ATTACHMENT A – COST FORM
Costs Related to the Historic East Side Survey
Itemized Expenditure Cost
Total Cost – Historic East Survey
ITEM 2
Costs Related to the Historic West Main, Lower Jefferson, Waterworks Complex Survey
Itemized Expenditure Cost
Total Cost – Historic East Survey
ITEM 3
Costs Related to the Historic Context Study
Itemized Expenditure Cost
Labor @ 75.00 39,000
Travel $2,500
Editorial services $1,000
Total Cost – Historic East Survey $42,500
CITY OF JEFFERSON
CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the date last executed by a party as indicated below, by and
between the City of Jefferson, a municipal corporation of the State of Missouri, hereinafter referred to as
"City", and Owen & Eastlake, Ltd., hereinafter referred to as "Contractor".
WITNESSETH:
THAT WHEREAS, the City desires to engage the Contractor to render certain services fora historic
context study of the City, hereinafter described in Exhibit A.
WHEREAS, Contractor has made certain representations and statements to the City with respect
to the provision of such services and the City has accepted said proposal to enter into a contract with the
Contractor for the performance of services by the Contractor.
NOW THEREFORE, for the considerations herein expressed, it is agreed by and between the City
and the Contractor as follows:
1. Scope of Services.
Contractor agrees to provide all supervision, labor, tools, equipment, materials and supplies for historical
and/or architectural services, as set forth in Exhibit A. In the event of a conflict between this agreement and
any attached exhibits, the provisions of this agreement shall govern and prevail,
2. Payment.
The City hereby agrees to pay Contractor for the work done pursuant to this contract according to the
payment schedule set forth in the contract documents upon acceptance of said work by an Agent of the City
of Jefferson, and in accordance with the rates and/or amounts stated in the bid of Contractor dated
November 22, 2021, which are by reference made a part hereof. No partial payment to Contractor shall
operate as approval or acceptance of work done or materials furnished hereunder. No change in
compensation shall be made unless there is a substantial and significant difference between the work
originally contemplated by this agreement and the work actually required. The total amount for services
rendered under this contract shall not exceed Forty -Two Thousand Five Hundred Dollars and Zero Cents
($42,500.00).
3. Term.
This contract shall commence on the date last executed by a party as indicated below. The Contractor shall
provide such historical and/or architectural services as set forth in Exhibit A, by July 15, 2022.
4. Additional Services.
The City may add to Contractor services or delete therefrom activities of a similar nature to those set forth
in Exhibit A, provided that the total cost of such work does not exceed the total cost allowance as specified
in paragraph 2 hereof. The Contractor shall undertake such changed activities only upon the direction of
the City. All such directives and changes shall be in written form and approved by the City and shall be
accepted and countersigned by the Contractor or its agreed representatives.
5. ,Personnel to be Provided.
The Contractor represents that Contractor has or will secure at its expense all personnel required to perform
the services called for under this contract by the Contractor. Such personnel shall not be employees of or
have any contractual relationship with the City except as employees of the Contractor. All of the services
required hereunder will be performed by the Contractor or under the Contractor's direct supervision and all
2
personnel engaged in the work shall be fully qualified and shall be authorized under state and local Iaw to
perform such services. None ofthe work or services covered by this contract shall be subcontracted except
as provided in Exhibit A without the written approval ofthe City.
6. Contractor's Responsibility for Subcontractors.
It is further agreed that Contractor shall be as fully responsible to the City for the acts and omissions of its
subcontractors, and of persons either directly or indirectly employed by them, as Contractor is for the acts
and omissions of persons it directly employs. Contractor shall cause appropriate provision; to be inserted
in all subcontracts relating to this work, to bind all subcontractors to Contractor by all the terms herein set
forth, insofar as applicable to the work of subcontractors and to give Contractor the same power regarding
termination of any subcontract as the City may exercise over Contractor under any provisions of this
contract. Nothing contained in this contract shall create any contractual relations between any
subcontractor and the City or between any subcontractors.
7. Independent Contractor.
The Contractor is an independent contractor and nothing herein shall constitute or designate the Contractor
or any of its employees as agents or employees of the City.
8. Benefits not Available.
The Contractor shall not be entitled to any of the benefits established for the employees of the City and
shall not be covered by the Workmen's Compensation Program of the City,
9. Nondiscrimination.
The Contractor agrees in the performance of the contract not to discriminate on the grounds or because of
race, creed, color, national origin or ancestry, sex, religion, handicap, age or political affiliation, against
any employee of Contractor or applicant for employment and shall include a similar provision in all
subcontracts let or awarded hereunder.
10. Illegal Immigration.
Prior to commencement of the work:
a. Contractor shall, by sworn affidavit and provision of documentation, affirm its enrollment
and participation in a federal work authorization program with respect to the employees
working in connection with the contracted services.
b. Contractor shall sign an affidavit affirming that it does not knowingly employ any person
who is an unauthorized alien in connection with the contracted services.
c. If Contractor is a sole proprietorship, partnership, or limited partnership, Contractor shall
provide proof of citizenship or lawful presence of the owner.
11. Notice to Proceed.
The services of the Contractor shall commence upon execution of this Agreement, and shall be undertaken
and completed in accordance with the schedule contained in Exhibit A.
12. Termination.
lf, through any cause, the Contractor shall fail to fulfill in timely and proper mariner its obligations under
this contract, or if the Contractor shall violate any of the covenants, agreements, or stipulations of this
contract, the City shall thereupon have the right to terminate this contract by giving written notice to the
Contractor of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof, at least five (5) days before the
effective day of such termination. The City reserves the right to terminate this contract for convenience
3
by giving at least fourteen (14) days prior written notice to Contractor, without prejudice to any other rights
or remedies of the City, provide Contractor shall be entitled to payment for all work completed by
Contractor through the date of termination. The Contractor may without cause terminate this contract upon
30 days prior written notice. In either such event all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies,
surveys, drawings, maps, models, photographs, and reports or other materials prepared by the Contractor
under this contract shall, at the option of the City, become its property, and the compensation for any
satisfactory work completed on such documents and other materials shall be determined. Notwithstanding
the above, the Contractor shall not be relieved of liability to the City for damages sustained by the City by
virtue of any such breach of contract by the Contractor.
13. Waiver of Breach.
Failure to insist upon strict compliance with any of the terms covenants or conditions herein shall not be
deemed a waiver of any such terms, covenants or conditions, nor shall any failure at one or more times be
deemed a waiver or relinquishment at any other time or times by any right under the terms, covenants or
conditions herein.
14. Authorship and Enforcement.
Parties agree that the production of this document was the joint effort of both parties and that the contract
should not be construed as having been drafted by either party. In the event that the City successfully
enforces the terms of this contract through litigation, the City shall be entitled to receive, in addition to any
other relief, its reasonable attorney's fees, expenses and costs.
15. Severability.
if any section, subsection, sentence, or clause of this contract shall be adjudged illegal, invalid, or
unenforceable, such illegality, invalidity, or unenforceability shall not affect the legality, validity, or
enforceability of the contract as a whole, or of any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or attachment not
so adjudged.
16. Assinnment.
The Contractor shall not assign any interest in this contract, and shall not transfer any interest in the same
(whether by assignment or novation), without prior written consent of the City thereto. Any such
assignment is expressly subject to all rights and remedies of the City under this agreement, including the
right to change or delete activities from the contract or to terminate the same as provided herein, and no
such assignment shall require the City to give any notice to any such assignee of any actions which the City
may take under this agreement, though City will attempt to so notify any such assignee.
17. Existing Data.
All information, data and reports as are existing, available and necessary for the carrying out of the work,
shall be furnished to the Contractor without charge by the City, and the City shall cooperate with the
Contractor in every reasonable way in carrying out the scope of services. The Contractor shall not be
liable for the accuracy of the information furnished by the city.
18. Confidentiality.
Any reports, data or similar information given to or prepared or assembled by the Contractor under this
contract which the City requests to be kept as confidential shall not be made available to any individual or
organization by the Contractor without prior written approval of the City.
19. Indemnity.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, the Contractor will defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City,
4
its elected and appointed officials, employees, and agents from and against any and all claims, damages,
losses, and expenses including attorneys' fees arising out of or resulting from the performance of the work,
provided that any such claim, damage, loss or expense (1) is attributable to bodily injury, sickness, disease,
or death, or to injury to or destruction of tangible property (other than the work itseIf) including the loss of
use resulting therefrom and (2) is caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission of contractor,
any subcontractor, anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of
them may be liable, regardless of whether or not it is caused in part by a party indemnified hereunder.
Such obligation shall not be construed to negate, abridge, or otherwise reduce any other right or obligation
of indemnity which would otherwise exist as to any party or person described in this paragraph.
20. Insurance.
Contractor shalt provide, at its sole expense, and maintain during the term of this agreement commercial
general liability insurance with a reputable, qualified, and financially sound company licensed to do
business in the State of Missouri, and unless otherwise approved by the City, with a rating by Best of not
less than "A," that shall protect the Contractor, the City, and the City's officials, officers, and employees
from claims which may arise from operations under this agreement, whether such operations are by the
Contractor, its officers, directors, employees and agents, or any subcontractors of Contractor. This liability
insurance shall include, but shall not be limited to, protection a tt. inst claims arising from bodily and
personal injury and damage to property, resulting from all Contractor operations, products, services or use
of automobiles, or construction equipment at a limit of $500,000 Each Occurrence, $3,000,000 Annual
Aggregate; provided that nothing herein shall be deemed a waiver of the City's sovereign immunity. An
endorsement shall be provided which states that the City is named as an additional insured and stating that
the policy shall not be cancelled or materially modified so as to be out of compliance with the requirements
of this section, or not renewed without 30 days advance written notice of such event being given to the City.
21. Documents.
Reproducible copies of tracings and maps prepared or obtained under the terms of this contract shall be
delivered upon request to and become the property of the City upon termination or completion of work.
Copies of basic survey notes and sketches, charts, computations and other data prepared or obtained under
this contract shall be made available, upon request, to the City without restrictions or limitations on their
use. When such copies are requested, the City agrees to pay the Contractor its costs of copying and
delivering same.
22. Rooks and Records.
The Contractor and all subcontractors shall maintain all books, documents, papers, accounting records and
other evidence pertaining to costs incurred in connection with this contract, and shall make such materials
available at their respective offices at all reasonable times during the contract and for a period of three (3)
years following completion of the contract.
23. Nonsvlicitatinn.
The Contractor warrants that they have not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona
fide employee working solely for the Contractor, to solicit or secure this contract, and that they have not
paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the
Contractor, any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts, or any other consideration, contingent
upon or resulting from the award or making of this contract. For breach or violation of this warranty, the
City shall have the right to annul this contract without liability, or, in its discretion, to deduct from the
contract price or consideration, or otherwise recover the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage,
brokerage fee, gifts, or contingent fee.
5
24. Delays.
That the Contractor shall not be liable for delays resulting from causes beyond the reasonable control of the
Contractor; that the Contractor has made no warranties, expressed or implied, which are not expressly set
forth in this contract; and that under no circumstances will the Contractor be liable for indirect or
consequential damages.
25. Amendments.
This contract may not be modified, changed or altered by any oral promise or statement by whosoever
made; nor shall any modification of it be binding upon the City until such written modification shall have
been approved in writing by an authorized officer of the City. Contractor acknowledges that the City may
not be responsible for paying for changes or modifications that were not propel ly authorized.
26. Governing Law.
The contract shall be governed by the laws of the State of Missouri. The courts of the State of Missouri
shall have jurisdiction over any dispute which arises under this contract, and each of the parties shall submit
and hereby consents to such courts exercise of jurisdiction. In any successful action by the City to enforce
this contract, the City shall be entitled to recover its attorney's fees and expenses incurred in such action.
27. Federal Funds to be Used.
The City of Jefferson is a recipient of federal grant funds. Therefore, the grant requirements in Exhibit 8
shall be fully considered in preparing responses and performing work under any resulting award.
28. Notices.
All notices required or permitted hereinunder and required to be in writing may be given by first class mail
addressed to the following addresses. The date and delivery of any notice shall be the date falling on the
second full day after the day of its mailing.
If to the City;
City of Jefferson
Department of Law
320 East McCarty Street
Jefferson City, Missouri, 65101
if to the Contractor;
Owen & Eastlake, Ltd.
Attn: Rory Krupp
1356 Hamlet Street
Columbus, OH 43201
[Signatures to Follow on Next Page]
6
CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI
Carrie Tergin, Mayor
ATTEST:
44tfiefeatait
City lark
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
OWEN & EASTLAI£E, LTD.
Title: .0 ,
Date:
ATTEST:
Title:
Exhibit A
3B. SCOPE OF WORK — HISTORIC CONTEXT STUDY
A. General lnformation
The City seeks to contract with a 36 CFR 61 qualified consultant to prepare a
historic context for Jefferson City, MO.
B. Consultant Requirements
l . The consultant shall prepare a historic context study of Jefferson City, MO
in accordance with the Secretary of Interior's Standards for Preservation
Planning and the Missouri State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO).
The historic context must provide the City of Jefferson with a framework
for identifying and evaluating the City's historic resources. The context
M1151 be able to be used as a tool aiding in the identification and evaluation
of resources by focusing on and explaining what aspects of geography,
history, and culture significantly shaped the physical development of
Jefferson City. The historic context shall examine land -use patterns and
built environment, what property types were important and associated with
development patterns, why the developments were important, and what
characteristics they need to have to be considered an important
representation of their type and context. The project must provide the
background necessary to understand why a resource may be significant
and must identify and explain in detail patterns, themes, or trends that
shaped the City's development.
The historic context must dedicate a chapter of the historic context to be
committed to examining how planning practices (exclusionary zoning,
racially restrictive covenants, and redlining practices), have led to racial
segregation and other discriminatory impacts on communities of color in
Jefferson City.
2. The consultant shall prepare a written report in a manner that is engaging
and informative for the public. It shall include:
A description of objective and methodology, a description of each historic
context, pictures illustrating contexts, property types, and common
architectural characteristics for each historic context, identify properties
associated with each historic context, provide recommendations for each
historic context, provide a summary of lost resources. Provide overall
recommendation and future actions, including suggestions of properties
for potential National Register listing, and provide a bibliography and list
of resources that were utilized.
13
3. Public Meetings
The consultant will conduct a minimum of two public meetings in
Jefferson City to inform the interested public about the goals and scope of
the historic context project. The first meeting will be held as near to the
beginning of the survey as practical and the second meeting will be
conducted after the project when the historic context study and
recommendations will be presented. Meetings should be primarily
informative, but may also be used to solicit information front
knowledgeable members of the public. The documentation required for the
public meeting will include a copy of the public meeting notice, the
meeting agenda, minutes from the meeting, and the sign -in sheet.
Public meeting notices regarding this grant project will include the
following acknowledgement:
This project is partially funded by a grant from the Missouri Department
of Natural Resources, State Historic Preservation Office and the U.S.
Department of the Interior, National Park Service. Grant awards do not
imply an endorsement of contents by the grantor. Federal laws prohibit
discrimination on the basis of race, religion, seer, age, handicap, or
ethnicity. For more information, write to the Office of Equal
Opportunity, U.S Department of the Interior, Washington D.C. 20240.
[This acknowledgement may be in any size type on the notice and in the
survey report.]
D. Qualifications
Consultants responding to this RFP must meet 36 CFR 61, Appendix A,
minimum professional requirements and possess the following qualifications:
• Possess a graduate degree in history or closely related field or a bachelor's
degree in history or closely related field;
• Demonstrate experience in preparing historic context studies;
• Have at least three years of experience as a professional historian following
completion of an undergraduate degree in history or closely related field;
• Possess the ability to meet federal and state standards for any deliverable
produced;
• Possess the ability to work independently in a team environment;
• Possess the ability to organize project records and meet deadlines; and
• Possess a strong commitment to quality control, attention to detail,
communication, and collaboration.
14
ATTACIIMEN 1' A — COST FORM
Costs Related to the Historic East Side Surve.
itemized Expenditure
Tatal C Historic East• Sttyey ; ::. ; r:
ITEM 2
Costs Related to the Historic West Alain, Lower Jet%rsoA Waterworks Corn llexx Survey_
'$i: Itemized Expenditure
?[ all ig
•Total Cdd't -- Historic East, S u ry eL ..
r�
ITEM 3
Costs Related to the Historic Context Stud
Itemized Expenditure
a
,Lost,, ;
Labor r? 75.00
39,000
Travel
$2,500
Editorial services
51,000
Total Cost --Historic East Survey .: * - •
. ..-
542,500
EXHIBIT B
FEDERAL TERMS
Byrd Anti -Lobbying Amendment (31 U.S.C. 1352)
Each contractor certifies to the tier above by completing the Certification Regarding Lobbying
form, that it will not and has not used Federal appropriated funds to pay any person or
organization for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of
an agency, a member of Congress, officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a member
of Congress in connection with obtaining any Federal contract, grant or any other award covered
by 31 U.S.C. 1352. Each tier must also disclose any lobbying with non -Federal funds that takes
place in connection with obtaining any Federal award.
Debarment and Suspension (Executive Orders 12549 and 12689)
A contract award will not be made to parties listed on the government wide exclusions in the
System for Award Management (SAM), in accordance with the 0M13 guidelines, 2 CFR 180.
SAM exclusions contain the names of parties debarred, suspended or otherwise excluded by
agencies as well as parties declared ineligible under statutory or regulatory authority other than
Executive Order 12549.
Procurement of Recovered Materials
The contractor must comply with section 6002 of the Solid Waste Disposal Acts as amended by
the Resources Conservation and Recovery Act. The requirements of this section include
procuring only items designated in guidelines of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) at
40 CFR part 247 that contain the highest percentage of recovered materials practicable,
consistent with maintaining a satisfactory level of competition, where the purchase price of the
item exceeds $10,000 or the value of the quantity acquired during the preceding fiscal year
exceeded $10,000; procuring solid waste management services in a manner that maximizes
energy and resource recovery; and establishing an affirmative procurement program for
procurement of recovered materials identified in the EPA guidelines.
Termination
1. Termination for Cause. The City may terminate this agreement, in whole or in part, at any
time before the date of completion whenever it is determined that the contractor has failed to
comply with the terms and conditions of the agreement. The City shall promptly notify the
contractor in writing of such a determination and the reasons for the termination, together
with the effective date. The City reserves the right to withhold all or a portion of funds if the
contractor violates any term or condition of this agreement. Termination for cause may be
considered for evaluating future agreements. The contractor may object to terminations with
cause and may provide information and documentation challenging the termination.
2. Termination for Convenience. Both the City and the contractor may terminate the agreement,
in whole or in part, when both parties agree that the continuation of the project would not
produce beneficial results commensurate with the further expenditure of funds.
3. The City reserves the right to terminate the contract at any time, for the convenience of the
City, without penalty or recourse, by giving written notice to the contractor at least thirty (30)
calendar days prior to the effective date of such termination. The contractor shall be entitled
3. Public Meetings
The consultant will conduct a minimum of two public meetings in
Jefferson City to inform the interested public about the goals and scope of
the historic context project. The first meeting will be held as near to the
beginning of the survey as practical and the second meeting will be
conducted after the project when the historic context study and
recommendations will be presented. Meetings should be primarily
informative, but may also be used to solicit information from
knowledgeable members of the public. The documentation required for the
public meeting will include a copy of the public meeting notice, the
meeting agenda, minutes from the meeting, and the sign -in sheet.
Public meeting notices regarding this grant project will include the
following acknowledgement:
This project is partially funded by a grant from the Missouri Department
of Natural Resources, State Historic Preservation Office and the U.S.
Department of the Interior, National Park Service. Grant awards do not
imply an endorsement of contents by the grantor. Federal laws prohibit
discrimination on the basis of race, religion, sex, age, handicap, or
ethnicity. For more information, write to the Office of Equal
Opportunity, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington D.0 20240.
[This acknowledgement may be in any size type on the notice and in the
survey report.]
D. Qualifications
Consultants responding to this RFP must meet 36 CFR 61, Appendix A,
minimum professional requirements and possess the following qualifications:
• Possess a graduate degree in history or closely related field or a bachelor's
degree in history or closely related field;
• Demonstrate experience in preparing historic context studies;
• Have at least three years of experience as a professional historian following
completion of an undergraduate degree in history or closely related field;
• Possess the ability to meet federal and state standards for any deliverable
produced;
• Possess the ability to work independently in a team environment;
• Possess the ability to organize project records and meet deadlines; and
• Possess a strong commitment to quality control, attention to detail,
communication, and collaboration.
14
to receive compensation for services and/or supplies delivered to and accepted by the City
pursuant to the contract prior to the effective date of termination.