The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My Public Portal About2022-05-12 packetNotice of Meeting & Tentative Agenda City of Jefferson Public Works & Planning Committee Thursday, May 12, 2022 7:30a.m. John G. Christy Municipal Building , 320 East McCarty Street Council Chambers Room (Upper Level) ~ Note: VIRTUAL and IN-PERSON MEETING To join virtually: https://jeffersoncity.webex.com/jeffersoncity/j.php?MTID=me30bce72a71e1e2a7a82cf2f15d2fb8e 1 . Introductions To join virtually call-in available at 1-404-397-1516 Meeting number (access code): 2494 017 7962 Meeting password : 1234 TENTATIVE AGENDA 2. Approval of the March 10, 2022 and April 18, 2022 Committee meeting minutes 3. New Business 1) MO Boulevard Roadside Park Agreement with the West Side Business Association & Rotary (Britt Smith) 2) 2022 Street Resurfacing Project Update (Britt Smith) 3) 2213 Edgewood Stormwater Concerns (owner: Rebecca Bethmann) (David Bange) 4) Potential Priorities for ARPA funds (Ron Fitzwater/Matt Morasch) 5) Downtown Parking Status (Ron Fitzwater/Matt Morasch) 6) Sales Tax Status (Ron Fitzwater/Matt Morasch) 7) Adoption of the 2018 edition of the ICC Model Codes (Matt Kreyling) 4 . Old Business 8) Committee Discussion of the Ohio Street Bridge Project 9) Mural Code Amendment (Eric Barron/Amy Schroeder) 5 . Citizen opportunity to address Council/Staff on Stormwater and Other Public Works Issues • 1605 Marion Drive Stormwater Issue-Matt Brenneke 6 . Reports : Neighborhood Service Grant Updates (Rachel Senzee) 7 . Adjourn NOTES Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under th e Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. Ple ase call (573) 634-6410 with questions regardi ng agenda items . Department of Public Works Memorandum 320 E. McCarty Street o Jefferson City , Missouri 65101 o P 573-634-6410 o F 573-634-6562 o www .jeffcitymo .org Date: April 28, 2022 To: Public Work and Planning Committee From: Britt E. Smith, P.E. Subject: Miss ouri Blvd Roadside Park Staff is requesting the committee's concurrence with the proposed Missouri Blvd Roadside Park master plan (attached) and recommendation for approval of a license agreement with the West Side Business Association and Jefferson City West Rotary to construct these impro vements over time. As the committee may recall, representatives from the West Side Business Association and Jefferson City West Rotary appeared before the committee in September of 2021 and requested to make improvements to the park. At that time the committee asked the groups to draft a master plan of the types of improvement desired and bring it back to the committee for review . Once accepted the groups would fundraise and solicit donation to complete the improvements. Currently the park area is maintained by the street division. That maintenance currently consists of mowing of the turf areas. These two civic groups have conducted several clean-ups in the park already which has greatly improved the appearance of the area . Staff has reviewed the proposed improvements and recommend approval. cc: Matt Morasch, P.E . Attachment n 0 f:: -? ~ U\ Vl 0 c :::l. Jeff DeLong, President (573) 690-550 jeff@customscreen-em b.com The Public Works and Planning Committee: Aprll18, 2022 Since 1957, members of the Jefferson City West Side Business Association have worked together to strengthen, promote and enhance the businesses of the West Side of Jefferson City so that our community may continue to enjoy a prosperous and high quality of life. In order to fu Ifill this mission, the JCWSBA Is committed to partnering on the beautification of the park area on Missouri Boulevard with Jefferson City Rotary West. We have included a master plan, which Includes building a walking path, picnic tables, a pavilion, new plants, signage, and more. We appreciate the opportunity to partner with the City of Jefferson and Jefferson City Rotary West to make this possible. This space Is one of the only green spaces in that area of town, and as more and more people are wanting to utilize outdoor spacing in the aftermath of the pandemic, It Is Important to have safe, clean areas for people to enjoy the outdoors. Thank you for your support. Sincerely, A ... -·······' .·· /7/~/ /y Jeff Delong JCWSBA President Department of Public Works Memorandum 320 E. McCarty Street ·Jefferson City, Missouri 65101 • P 573-634-6410 • F 573-634-6562 • www .jeffcitymo .org Date: To: From: Subject: April 28, 2022 Public Work and Planning Committee Britt E. Smith, P.E. ~ 2022 Street Surface Maintenance Program Staff requests the committee's endorsement of the attached street surface maintenance program for FY2022 . As the committee will note, the plan also includes a preliminary list of streets scheduled for work in the coming years . In the% cent capital improvement sales tax there is an allocation for our contract street maintenance program. This year's program funding is $526,000 from sales tax G and $690,000 from sales tax H (total of $1 ,216,000). To carry out this program, staff gathers information from various sources including personal observation as well as concerns raised by citizens and our pavement condition study. The resulting list is then evaluated against other factors such as condition; use; ride quality; as well as planned future projects by the city, developers and/or utility companies in an effort to determine the most cost-effective plan meeting the greatest needs. Additionally , our current overall street condition survey is dated information . Staff has been working with some professors from the University of Missouri -Columbia who have developed a very cost effecting street condition survey system. With this new system we propose completing a condition survey. Final contract details are still being worked out but the cost is expected to be approximately $70,000 and staff proposes paying for this work from the street maintenance portion of the %Cent CIP as well. With approval from the committee, staff intends bring forward a series of contracts to complete the work outlined . cc : Matt Morasch, P.E . Attachment Preliminary Street Overlay List Summary Dated Revised: April 27, 2022 LOCATION Planned WARD NEWT FROM TO Lane COST Year LIST Miles iil Antietam Ct. 2022 4 y Gettyburg PI E nd 0.17 :.:J Fo xb oro 2022 4 Nob Hill Concrete 0.15 Q) Gettyburb PI u 2022 4 Shermans Hol low End 1.12 ~ Greystone Dr 2022 4 Concrete Gettysburg PL 0.64 ;;J (/) Nob Hill 2022 4 Fairway Dr. Concrete 0.93 e u Shanon Dale Ct 2022 4 Greystone Dr End 0.34 ~ Sherwood Dr 2022 4 y Concrete End 0 .84 N Taylors Ridge Ct Sherwood Dr N 2022 4 End 0 .32 0 N Tylers Run Ct 2022 4 Sherwood Dr End 0 .27 Sub-Total 4.76 $176,646 Truman Blvd 2022 3 Amazonas Dr. Ventura Dr. 0.23 Truman Blvd 2022 3 N Ten Mile Dr. Scott Station Rd . 2 .73 Truman Blvd 2022 3 Scott Station Rd. Amazonas Dr 0 .53 Truman Blvd 2022 3 Ventura Dr. W Truman PI (P) 0.56 Truman Blvd 2022 3 W Truman PI (P} Country Club Dr . 0 .78 Q)W Norris Dr. 2022 3 y Boonville Road Concrete 0 .65 ~::J Burehrle Dr. 2022 4 y Satinwood Dr. Edgewood Dr. 1 .27 ~>- (/) ("(! Dogwood Dr. 2022 4 y Buehrle Dr. Edgewood Dr. 0 .39 N"C N QJ Dogwood Dr. 2022 4 y Stdium Blvd. Buehrle Dr. 0.18 0 > NO Lynnwood Dr. 2022 4 Stadium Blvd. Buehrle Dr . 0 .2 7 Melody Dr. 2022 4 y Satinwood Dr. Pondarosa Rd. 0.73 Pondarosa Rd . 2022 4 y Buehrle Dr. Edgewood Dr. 0 .38 Swifts Hwy . 2022 4 Edgewood Dr. Southwest Blvd . 0.56 Ellis Blvd 2022 5 Greenberry Rd. Rosewood Dr. 1.97 Greenberry Rd. 2022 5 Ellis Blvd. City Limits 1.41 Sub-Total 12 .65 $826,267 Armory Alley 2022 2 St . Marys Blvd End of City Maint. 0.12 Armory Dr. 2022 2 St. Marys Blvd End of City Maint. 0.17 Ashley St. 2022 2 Madison St. Jefferson St. 0.22 Broadway St. 2022 2 W . Main St. W . High St. 0.51 Cherry St. 2022 2 Miller St. McCarty St. 0 .19 Chestnut St. 2022 2 Bridge (MoDOT) McCarty St. 0 .21 ~ High St 2022 2 Jefferson St. Washington St. 0.41 N 0 High St 2022 2 Washington St. Broadway St. 0.30 N c Miller St. E . 2022 2 Cherry St. Laffayette 0.30 "0 Miller St. E. 2022 2 Chestnut St. Cherry St. 0 .16 ·ro ~ Miller St. E. 2022 2 Clark Ave Chestnut St. 0.83 ~ > :go St Marys Blvd 2022 2 Armory Dr Gipfert Ln 1 .24 .::; 1/) St Marys Blvd 2022 2 Gipfert Ln Dead End 1.20 (f)(j) N ~ Williams St. 2022 2 Di x Rd Beck St . 0.24 N ~ 0(/) Industrial Dr 2022 3 Di x Rd Wilson Dr. 0 .99 N~ iil Industrial Dr 2022 3 Norman Dr. Jaycee Dr. 1 .59 :.:J Industrial Dr 2022 3 Wilson Dr. Norman Dr. 1 .24 -ro 0 Meadow Brook Ct. 2022 3 Rock Creek Terr. Dead End 0.22 () ro Meadow Brook Dr . 2022 3 Meadow Brook Ct. Valley View Terr . 0 .29 Q) Rock Creek Terr . 2022 3 Valley Park Dr. Meadow Brook Ct. 0 .37 (/) Valley Park Dr . 2022 3 Country Club Dr . Valley View Terr . 0 .57 Valley View Ct. 2022 3 Valley View Terr. Dead End 0.58 Valley View Terr. 2022 3 Valley View Ct. Dead End 0.89 Clover Ln 2022 5 Payne St. Green meadow 0 .16 Green Meadow Dr. 2022 5 Whitney Woods Dr. North End 1.68 Payne St. 2022 5 Greenberry Rd . Brookside Dr. 0 .65 Sub-Total 15.33 $93,987 Yearly Total 32.74 $1,096,900 Page 1 of 3 Preli m inary Stree t Ove rla y List Summary Dat ed Revise d : A p ri l 27, 2022 LOCATION Planned WARD NEWT FROM Lane Year LIST TO Miles COST 2:' Mercedes Ln . 2023 3 Schum ate Chapel Rd . Schumate Chaple Rd . 0.60 n ~ 0 Pinehurs t Ct. 2023 4 Turnbe rry Dr . End 0.26 ~ ·E -~ Turnberry Ct. 2023 4 Turnberry Dr En d 1 .39 N ~ :2: Turnberry Dr 2023 4 Willow Lake Ct. Turnberry Dr 1 .25 a_ Willow Lake Ct. 2023 4 Turnbe rry Dl. End 0 .19 Hough St. 2023 Grant St. Riverside Dr. 1 .18 S . Lincoln St. 2023 y McCarty St. Hough Park Rd . 0 .56 W illcon xon Dr 202 3 0 .36 Binder Dr. 2023 3 Oakview Dr. Livingston St. 1 .08 Hillsda le Dr. 2023 3 Oakview Dr. Binder Dr. 0.31 Marilynn Dr. 2023 3 Binder Dr . Forest Hi ll Ave . 0.81 Oakview Dr . 2023 3 Binder Dr . Maril yn St. 0.57 Schumate Chapel Rd . 2023 3 Truman Blvd . Unilever Entrance 0 .27 Schumate Chapel Rd . 2023 3 y Un ilever Entrance City Limits 1 .04 WillowS!. 2023 3 W. Main St. Be lai r Dr. 0 .28 Bassman Rd . 2 023 4 y W estwood Dr. Southwest Blvd . 0 .4 0 Crestmere Ct. 2023 4 Westwood Dr. Parkway Rd . N. 0 .51 a; Eagle T race 2023 4 End End 0.43 !!:! en_ Glenwood Dr . 2023 4 Crestmere Ct. Southwest Blvd . 0 .34 2:' -~ Oak Leaf Dr. 2023 4 y Jefferson St. Red Oak Dr. 0 .24 ro __j c >-Over look Dr . 2023 4 Route C Cedar Hill Rd 1 .18 ·-co E-.:: Parkway Rd . E . 202 3 4 y Parkway Rd . N. Glenwood Dr . 0 .13 = Q) Q) > Pa rkway Rd. N . 2023 4 y Crestmere Ct. Pa rkway Rd . E . 0 .12 cto (") Red Oak Dr . 2023 4 y South ridge Dr . Oak Leaf Dr . 0.47 N 0 Stone Briar Rd 202 3 4 y Turnberry Dr . Eagle Trace 0 .15 N Sun Meadow Ln . 2023 4 y Ove rl ook Dr. Sou th En d Ove rl ook Dr. Nort h End 0 .36 Turnbe rry Dr. 2023 4 y Country Club Wi llow La ke Ct. 1.25 Westwood Dr . 2023 4 y Tower Dr. Southwest Blvd . 0 .68 W estwood Dr. 2023 4 y Woodclift Dr. Tower Dr . 0 .39 Windsor St. 2 023 4 y Westwood Dr . Tower Dr. 0 .31 Blueb ird Ln 2023 5 0 .53 Di xon 202 3 5 y Greenberry Rd . Hough Park Rd . 0 .74 Flamingo Rd 202 3 5 y 0.40 ldlewood Rd 2023 5 y Bluebird Meadowlark Ln 0 .28 ldlewood Rd 2023 5 y ld lewood Ct Blueb ird 1.05 Meadowlar k Ln 2023 5 y 0 .60 Starling Dr . 2023 5 y 0 .57 Yearly Estimated Total 21 .27 $1,184,758 .06 Page 2 of 3 Preliminary Stree t Overlay List Summary Dated Revised: April 27, 2022 LOCATION Planned WARD NEWT FROM TO Lane COST Year LIST Miles Camzie Dr. 2024 5 y lven Rd . Hoffman Dt. 0 .69 Hoffman Dr . 2024 5 y Concrete End 0.25 Be llevue Ct 2024 2 y Hawthorne Parkway End 0.14 Darlene Dr 2024 2 y Linden Dr Pamela Dr. 0.57 Di x Rd . 2024 2 y Industrial Dr. W. Main St 0 .60 Hawthorne Parkway 202 4 2 y Linden Dr Bellevue Ct 0.19 Holly Dr 2024 2 y Linden Dr Minnesota Ave 0 .36 Indiana Ave 2024 2 y Nebraska Ave End 0 .19 Indiana/Minnesota Ave 2024 2 y Minnesota Ave Indiana Ave 0 .10 Jefferson St. 2024 2 y Asheley St Atch ison St 0.29 tl Jefferson St. 2024 2 Atchison St. Hwy 54 Bridge 0 .99 :.J Jefferson St. 2024 2 Dun k lin St. Ashley St 0 .52 (!) u Jefferson St. 2024 2 Expressway Dunk lin St. 0 .34 <:: ro Jefferson St . 2024 2 y Hwy 54 Bridge Stadium Blvd 0.13 <:: 2 Laurel Dr 2024 2 y Linden Dr Minnesota Ave 0.31 <:: ro Linden Dr 2024 2 y Filmore St. Dar lene Dr . 0 .82 ~ a; Madison St. 2024 2 y Ashley St. Atchison St 0 .32 ~ Madison St . 2024 2 y Atchison St. Franklin St. 0 .63 Ci5 Madison St. 2024 2 y Concrete Ashley St 0 .19 ~ Madison St. 2024 2 y Fran klin St. Hwy 54 On Ramp 0.45 ro -~ Minnesota Ave 2024 2 y In diana/Minn esota Ave End 0 .20 -~ Boonville Rd . 2024 3 y Belmont Dr . Hwy 179 2.14 ~ [1_ Boonville Rd . 2024 3 y Livingston Belmont Dr. 1.66 v Boonville Rd . 2024 3 y W. Ma in St. Livingston St. 2 .05 N 0 Brookgreen Dr. 2024 5 Cimarron Dr . End 0.31 N Carousel Dr. 2024 5 Merlin Dt. Tanner Bridge Rd 0.41 Cimarron Dr . 2024 5 Tanner Bridge Rd Brookgreen Dr . 0 .64 Field Haven Dr. 2024 5 Knight Valley Dr . Park Crest Dr . 0 .15 Hoffman Dt. 2024 5 Tanner Bridge Rd lven Rd . 0 .54 lven Rd. 2024 5 Hoffman Dr . End 0 .50 K ing Arthur Dr. 202 4 5 Carousel Dr . End 0 .18 Knight Valley Dr . 20 24 5 Ca rousel Dr. Field Haven Dr. 0.45 Knight Valley Dr. 2024 5 Fie ld Haven Dr. Concrete 0 .11 Merlin Dr. 2024 5 Cimarron Dr. Carousel Dr . 0.76 Park Crest Dr. 2024 5 Field Haven Dr . Hoffman Dt. 0 .51 Yearly Estimated Total 18.72 $1,193,708 .22 Hillsdale Dr . 2025 3 Binder Dr . Belair Dr. 0 .74 Industrial Dr 2025 2 Argonne St. Hughes St. 0 .90 Industrial Dr 2025 2 Hart St. Argonne St. 0 .82 tl Industrial Dr 2025 2 McCarty St. Hart St. 1.1 6 :.J High St 2025 1 Lafayette St. Jackson St. 0 .71 (!) Atchison St. 2025 2 Adams St. Jackson St. 0 .19 u <:: Carter 2025 2 Swifts Hwy Stadium 0 .58 ro <:: High St 2025 2 Broadway St. Viaduct 0.44 2 <:: High St 2025 2 Jackson St. Adams St. 0 .39 '(ij ~ Belair Dr. 2025 3 T win Hills Boonville Rd 0 .95 a; Eastern Air 2025 3 Southen Air A irview Dr. 0 .28 ~ Ci5 Jaycee Dr. 2025 3 Industrial Dr . W . Main St 0 .38 ~ Jaycee Dr. 2025 3 Industrial Dr . Schellridg e Rd . Ea st 1.21 ro Royal Air Dr . 2025 3 Belair Dr . Airview Dr. 0 .26 <:: :~ Tw in Hill Rd . 2025 3 Belair Dr . Sue Dr. 1.02 ~ Hol iday Dr . 20 25 5 Chestnut St. End 0 .20 [1_ lsom Dr. 2025 5 Ho ugh Park Rd Major Dr. 0 .31 I!) N Jobe 2025 5 Hough Park Rd Cu l-de-sac 0 .53 0 N Kolb Dr 2025 5 Hough Park Rd Major Dr. 0 .33 Major Dr . 2025 5 Hough Park Rd . Ko lb Dr . 0 .61 Winston Ct. 2025 5 Chestnut St. End 0 .28 Winston Dr. 2025 5 Holiday Dr. Hough Park Rd . 1.49 Yearly Estimated Total 13 .77 $881,567 .78 Total 4 Year Program Estimated Cost $4 ,356 ,934.22 Page 3 of 3 Quotation for Professional Services To: Britt Smith, Operations Division Director From: William Buttlar Subject: 2022 Pavement Condition Evaluation Introduction TIGER EYE fENOfNEERrNG Tiger Eye Engineering, LLC 1601 S. Providence Rd., 1190 Columbia, Missouri, USA 65211 +001(217}369-8370 Date: April 12, 2022 Project: Jefferson City, MO Project No: N/A Tiger Eye Engineering (TEE} is pleased to provide this quotation of services in response to our understanding of Jefferson City's pavement evaluation and management needs. Our cutting- edge machine learning based software is world-class, and our staff offers over 100 years of collective experience in pavement engineering. Please see Appendix A for our company bio and summary of qualifications. Our approach involves a streamlined data collection process combined with powerful and consistent pavement evaluation through advanced machine learning, data analytics, and data visualization. We also calibrate and validate our results to your local conditions. This approach will provide Jefferson City with the data it needs to make data- driven, accurate assessments of its road infrastructure network and a system to evaluate and fine-tune maintenance decisions in the coming months and years to improve overall pavement condition while stretching maintenance dollars. Data Collection Our pavement imaging system includes a high-resolution 360 degree camera, a stereo camera, a GPS unit, and accelerometers to capture pavement roughness. The video frames will be labeled with GPS information, which are then used by our software to extract images at specified intervals to remove duplication and to cover the pavement network continuously (Figure 1}. The lnsta 360 cameras are used to collect a 360 degree street-view and top-down images, the latter of which will be used for pavement distress evaluation. The Zed stereo camera will be used to estimate rutting, and to identify areas where foot-on-ground rutting validation activities will be carried out (Figure 1}. Appendix B provides details on our IRI capture and evaluation system. --------------------- .ZED , a) b) c) Figure 1. a) lnsta 360 Camera, b) Zed Stereo Camera, and c) GPS Unit I Frame 1 I Frame 98 I Frame 151 I Frame (n) I I I Distan ~e: Sm I I I I Dista ~ce: Sm I I Distance: Sm I Figure 2. Converting Video Frames to .jpg Images at Specified Intervals {5 m) using GPS Data Automated Evaluation of Captured Pavement Images Pavement condition assessment provides critically needed information allowing owner-agencies to make more cost-effective and consistent decisions as they manage their network of urban and/or rural pavements. Generally, pavement distress inspections are performed using sophisticated data collection vehicles and/or foot-on-ground surveys . In either approach, the process of distress detection is sub-optimal, as it inherently contains human bias, is very costly and inefficient, and can introduce on-site inspector safety risks. The Tiger Eye Engineering (TEE} automated pavement evaluation software suite was developed by coding and integrating several machine learning and deep learning techniques for distress detection and pavement condition assessment (Figure 3}. Ar·tificial Intelligence & Deep Leaming Figure 3. Application of AI to Detect Type, Extent and Severity of Distresses Visualization Pavement condition of the evaluated sections (2022 survey and previous year data results) can be visualized on TEE's interactive visualization platforms. Examples of our two main visualization programs are shown in Figures 4 and 5, where 'heat maps' of pavement condition or other user- selectable data items can be holistically viewed. The statistics of the distresses can be categorized and shown based on the city area (sector, council, segment), filtered by pavement type or classification, traffic level, etc. Also, corresponding camera images and video replays can be accessed in a point-and-click fashion, leading to pop-up boxes showing captured images, filters for superimposing ML-assessed pavement distresses and locations, and videos of driven pavement segments as catalogued by the Jefferson City. Multiple user accounts for access to the data visualization platform will be provided upon request. Figure 4. Example of PCI Heat Map for Jefferson City, MO Figure 5. Interactive Data Visualization Map Example: Kansas City (PCI & OCI) Proposed Scope of Work and Budget The scope of work and associated per-mile cost proposal is presented in Table 1, along with additional details and illustrative examples of the proposed deli v erables for the proposed pavement evaluation items. The cost of the total proposed evaluation and visualization of 230 lane-miles of Jefferson City roads and streets is $67,850, which includes a condition-over-time option, which provides a history of pavement condition versus time using TEE's Smart Pavement Monitoring software algorithms. We highly recommend this option, as it will greatly strengthen our collective abilities to evaluate exiting maintenance strategies and to establish baseline pavement performance trajectories. Without the condition -over-time option, the budget for the proposed work would be $60,950. Table 1. Items in Project Scope, Cost per Mile, Details, and Illustrative Examples Cost Details Illustrative Examples Item ($/mile) Private and public meetings, Project 10 presentations, --- management communications, data on request Consultations, labeling , and Planning phase 10 setting of filters for database --- and visualization platform from existing GIS PCI-Year 100 90 ~ 80 70 PCI rating for previous year s 60 Google Street-30 and deterioration curve s 2 50 view 40 (condition -over-time option) 30 20 10 0 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 Ye ar Downward Facing First or 1/year data collection and 360 Camera 40 recommended to occur after --- Data Collection Spring thaw ~<•>»M o---- I · i ( Using TEE's cloud -based annotation tool (CVAT) lj Annotating, local ·.~i distress ID 40 Note : Jefferson city municipal " training staff may conv eni ently intera ct with TEE's engineers on this } task using the cloud-based tool i Individual Distress Identification PCI, PASER or Custom Rating- ML Validation of PCI or Other Rati IRI Capture and Data Processing Rut Depth Measurement, Stereographic Cameras Interactive data visualization maps Data Formatting, Export to Database Data Storage and Retrieval Add Mid-Fall Data Collection 50 20 5 10 30 30 10 0 Optional/ Please In ire Using TEE's ML-based software To be selected by Jefferson city Minimum of 5% of pavement network Validated at MoDOT's calibration/validation site in Linn, MO (State Tech Airport) Stereographic camera resolution is 1 mm for 1 m mounting height, rut ca libration and va lidation will be conducted in tandem with PCI validation View and aggregate data , heat maps, data analytics, cloud- based, image/video integration Integration with Jeff City GIS platform First year of data storage and back-up offered free of charge for orders of $50/mile and hi Data added to visualization platform upon collection 20.0 0 ,0 ' 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 Profile(m) 0 - -- _) :Iii:) _) 1 Rutting Add Mid-Winter Optional/ Discount applied for 3x or 4x Data Collection Please data collection/year --- Inquire Add Mid-summer Optional/ Discount applied for 3x or 4x data collection Please data co ll ection/year --- Inquire Report on By TEE's pavement experts, Methods/Findings 10 having over 100 years of --- comb ined experience! Maintenance rec ., Optional/ planning and Please Available upon request --- optimization Inquire Total 295 $67,850 (Assuming 230 lane-Without condition-over-time option, mi.) $60,950 (230 lane-mi. @$265/mi.) Project Tasks and Timeline • Task 1: Planning phase (1 month) • Task 2: Data collection (1 month) • Preliminary Data Available for Customer Review Task 3: Annotating, local distress ID training (2 months) Task 4: PCI model development (1 month) and validation (1 month) • Task 5: Interactive data visualization (1 month) Task 6: Written report on methods and data interpretation (1 month) Table 2. Project Timeline, Gantt Chart = ~== May Jun Ju ly Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec '22 '22 '22 '22 '22 '22 '22 '22 1) Planning 2) Data Collection 3) Annotate/Train 4) PCI Model Dev. 5) Data Visualization 6) Final Report Summary Thank you for considering TEE as a viable solution to your pavement evaluation and management needs. If any questions arise, please do not hesitate to contact us at (217) 369-8370. We promise to discuss and validate your data and to customize your data visualization platform to your complete satisfaction. We firmly believe that with higher quality data and improved data analytics and visualization at your disposal, Jefferson City's road conditional and road budget will be better-than-ever in the coming months and years. We look forward to working with you! Tiger Eye Engineering William G. Buttlar, Managing Partner Appendix I Company Bio and Qualifications Tiger Eye Engineering (TEE} is believed to be the world's first pavement engineering company devoted to providing cutting-edge machine-learning based software for rapid, bias-free pavement evaluations coupled with an integrated visualization platform. Recently established in 2021 in collaboration with the University of Missouri-Columbia, its founders have over 100 years of collective experience in pavement engineering and transportation data science and a robust portfolio of pavement condition assessment projects and proprietary software programs. TEE's business model involves partnering with local engineering firms to provide clients with high- quality, locally-validated pavement evaluations at a highly competitive price point. This is made possible by its powerful and efficient machine-learning based software programs. TEE's software licensing partnership with the University of Missouri-Columbia keeps TEE at the cutting edge of pavement data science through convenient and continuous transfer of technology developed at Mizzou by TEE's founding members to the pavement engineering community through Tiger Eye Engineering, LLC. TEE's flagship software harnesses the power of multiple, advanced machine learning algorithms purpose-built for pavement evaluation and rating. TEE's software delivers accurate, unbiased assessments of pavement condition (type, extent, and severity of customer-selected distresses} and section-by-section pavement ratings (standard (e.g., PCI} or local/tailored ratings). Other powerful features of TEE's machine-learning based software system include distress identification/model training by TEE's in-house, internationally-renowned pavement experts, the ability for hybrid training and/or training validation by local pavement experts, multi- year and multi-site accuracy improvement over time with increased local, regional and international model training, and seamless export of data and integration with client/local GIS database systems. TEE also has developed software platforms providing clients with user-friendly data visualization and analytics, and rapid, low-cost hardware and software systems for determination of International Roughness Index (IRI} and pavement rut depth. Software solutions are tailored based on client needs with respect to local and cloud-based data hosting and computing, data backup, and multi-year data hosting needs. TEE's software has been validated by a number of US and international customers and collaborators in Missouri, Illinois, Canada, and Italy. TEE's founding members all hold PhD degrees in Civil Engineering (Buttlar, Adu-Gyamfi, Majidifard}, with specialization in pavements, transportation, and data science. TEES' founders have published several of the foundational journal papers on machine learning in pavements, IRI assessment with smartphone data capture, and were the lead organizers ofthe First International Symposium on Data Science in Pavements (www .pavementdatasci e nce .com }, held in March of 2022 in conjunction with the US Federal Highway Administration, Turner-Fairbanks Highway Research Laboratory. TEE's offices, labs and computational servers are headquartered at the Missouri Innovation Center (MIC}, located near the south-west corner of the University of Missouri campus in Columbia, Missouri (USA}. Mr. Charlie Nemmers rounds out TEE's technical staff, having formerly served as a Director of the FHWA Turner Fairbanks Highway Research Lab and as a faculty member at Mizzou. TEE Engineers have performance pavement evaluation and management projects across the country, and have international experience. Dr. Buttlar is the Editor-In-Chief of Road Materials and Pavement Design, an International Journal. He also chaired the RILEM committee TC-MDC, Mechanisms of Cracking and Debonding in Asphalt and Composite Pavements. We have managed related projects across Missouri, including projects with MoDOT, City of KCMO, City of St. Louis, and a number of other smaller cities and counties across the state. We also have previous project experience in Illinois, Minnesota, Kansas, Oklahoma, Georgia, Florida, Virginia, Pennsylvania, Texas, and California. Appendix B IRI Assessment with TEE's Mobile App TigerEye's mobile application (interface shown in Figure Bl} will be used to estimate the roughness index (IRI}. The APP first captures vehicles' speed, acceleration, rotation, heading, location (latitude, longitude) from the phone's on-board sensors. The APP has been calibrated to IRI: data was collected at different speeds, on different types of roads and a machine learning algorithm has been developed to correlate the data captured from the phone to actual IRI data. The TigerEye APP will output live roughness information when WiFi is available. In WiFi-dead zones, the APP stores vehicle vibration and mobility information in the smartphone storage system. 0 Figure Bl. Mobile App Interface for Capturing IRI Figure B2 shows the accuracy of the mobile apps' estimated IRI on different road sections and vehicle speeds. The average root mean squared error ranges between 1.6 and 5.8 inches per mile. The accuracy is lowest for low-speed roads, with average RMSE ranging between 3 and 8 inches per mile. Consistently high accuracies are observed when speeds are greater than 35 mph. -o-ue uo -P'ediCted ,...... Q.) ·;;: 100 = ........ r/) (.) -5 80 = 40 RMS E = 3.40 inches/mile ,...... 70 Q.) • 0 10 20 30 40 40 so 60 70 Di stanc e (mil es) Pr e d icted iri (i nc he /mil e) Figure B2. Accuracy of T ige r Eye AP P for Estimating IRI • • • The software-based approached will calibrated and validated against roughness captured by a Class 1 Inertial Profiler that satisfies the ASTM -950 -98 Standard, "Standard Test Method for Measuring the Longitudinal Profile of Traveled Surfaces with an Accelerometer Established Inertial Profiling. Calibration will be carried out at the State Technical College airport, in Linn, MO. The advantage of the smartphone based system is its high accuracy and low cost, which opens the door for more frequent assessments to be made. It can also detect highly localized, severe acceleration features, such as potholes, which can be tagged and automatically sent to TEE's visualization platform. Memorandum 320 East McCarty Street • Jefferson City, Missouri 65101 • P: 5 73 .634 .641 0 • F: 5 73.634.6562 • www .jeffersoncitymo .gov Date: To : From : Subject: May 6, 2022 Public Works and Planning Committee David Bange P.E., City Engineer ~ Estimate to Rebuild Stormwater System at 2213 W. Edgewood Drive As requested by the Committee, staff have developed a cost estimate based on a schematic design for the replacement of the stormwater system at 2213 W. Edgewood Drive, the estimate is $48,740. Accepting this pipe or other pipes on private property for maintenance or replacement is contrary to City Code Section 31-240 B.3 (attached) and would have far reaching practical and financial consequences . In the practical realm, longer stretches of pipe may traverse multiple properties. Some owners may be willing to grant an easement while other may not. In the case of the former while they might be willing to grant an easement the location that they wish to grant may not be appropriate . In this instance and in the latter case, this may leave the City in a position where they would have to condemn property to get the necessary easements . Private pipes are known to exist under driveways, parking lots , retaining walls, swimming pools, garden sheds, and in some instances exist under houses or buildings. Because the pipe is on private property development around or over the pipe occurred with no oversite or control. In older parts of town, it is not uncommon to see houses built so close to the pipe that it is nearly impossible to operate equipment in the space between them. The end result of these and other practical concerns is that the costs associated with the maintenance and replacement of pipes on private property are s ignificantly higher than pipes that have been protected from development by easements . There are an unknown number of pipes on private property and accepting these pipes would create an unquantified financial liability for the City. Carried to its logical conclusion the acceptance of pipes on private property would corrupt the development process . With the knowledge that the City would take over failing infrastructure on private property, developers would have no incentive to establish any easements or to follow any established City standards for pipes outside the right of way. The acceptance of private pipes could also lead to individual property owners installing any manner of pipes or other stormwater controls on their property and in doing so create infrastructure that the City would then have to maintain . U:\Public Works\Engineering\dbange\PUBLIC WORKS & PLANNING\2022\5-2022\Private Stormwater.docx Memorandum Because of these consequences staff would not recommend the acceptance of stormwater infrastructure that is located on private property. If the Council were to choose otherwise it would be important to formulize this decision with a written policy and ultimately a change to the City Code. If you have any questions or concerns I can be reached at 634-6433. U:\Public Works\Engineering\dbange\PUBLIC WORKS & PLANNING\2022\5-2022\Private Storrnwater.docx 2 ITEM NO. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 16 17 CITY OF JEFFERSON PROJECT SETUP SHEET 2213 W. Edgewood Drive DESCRIPTION UNITS Mobilization LS Temporary Traffic Control LS Removals LS Tree Removal EA Earthwork LS Straw Wattle LF Rock Removal CY 4' x 3' Type "A" Inlet EA 4' Dia. Junction Box EA 18" Dia. HP-N12 LF 18" End Section EA 6" Thick Concrete Pavement SY Type "A" Curb and Gutter LF 4" Thick PCC Sidewalk SY Seed and Mulch AC Erosion Control Blanket SY 0 w>-I-I-<(-~!z -<( UNIT 1-::> ~0 PRICE AMOUNT 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 1 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 2 $5,000.00 $10,000.00 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 60 $5.50 $330.00 20 $95.00 $1,900.00 1 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 2 $4,200'.00 $8,400.00 119 $95.00 $11,305.00 1 $600.00 $600.00 5 $85.00 $425.00 20 $38.00 $760.00 2 $60.00 $120.00 0.1 $10,000.00 $1,000.00 180 $5.00 $900.00 TOTAL BASE BID $48,740.00 I ct' I I ct' I I (, ~ ... ... ct' I I I 'z ~ ... ~ C91.7 8 69~.7 69Z.3 69::!.3J 689 5 688 5:2 685.4 ~85 38 676.0 o76.04 0 I 8 ,l> I / ... I ......... ,l> ~ ...... .........J Chtcktd By : I J l ......., " f "'~ I ~ I ,l> I I I /'I / I I I Plan and Profile I I I I I ( I I I I I .~ ~ I '!QQ. ("b 0~ 0 I ~ f .::; :oy ' [7> / / :::! 0 5/10/22, 4:39 PM Jefferson City, MO Code of Ordinances Sec. 31-240. -Easements and maintenance. A. Easements. Whenever improvements to land are made, easements for the stormwater drainage system including structural facilities, engineered channels and overflow paths, shall be provided across private property. Easements through existing developments may be obtained as deemed necessary by the Director. Drainage easements shall include access from a convenient public street or parking lot. The minimum width of easements for stormwater drainage shall be 15 feet. Where a storm drain consists of a closed conduit, the width shall be the greater of 15 feet or the sum of the conduit diameter and twice the cover depth over the conduit. Where the drainage system consists of an engineered channel, easements shall be as wide as the top of bank width plus ten feet each side. B. Maintenance. 1. Public stormwater imP-rovements. Maintenance of stormwater sewers, lined drainage channels, detention facilities and related facilities located within public drainage easements shall be the responsibility of the City. 2. Natural channels. The City may undertake all maintenance activities, deemed necessary by the Director, of natural watercourses and other unlined drainage channels located within public drainage easements; however, assumption of such maintenance activities does not relieve the property owner of the responsibility for normal maintenance including debris removal, cutting of vegetation, repair of erosion and removal of silt. 3. Private stormwater imP-rovements. Maintenance of stormwater facilities located on private property and not within any public drainage easements shall be the responsibility of the property owners and shall include debris removal and cleaning, cutting of vegetation, repair of erosion, removal of silt and maintenance of structural facilities. 4. Private detention facilities. a. ResP-onsibilities. Owners of land containing private detention facilities shall maintain the facility as it was designed in order to continue the mitigation ofthe stormwater impacts. This maintenance shall include removal of overgrown vegetation, repair of erosion, repairs to any inlet/outlet structures, and removal of excess silt or any other maintenance deemed necessary to provide the design storage capacity. b. Nuisance declared. Failure to provide necessary maintenance shall be deemed a nuisance. c. Stormwater P-Ollution P-revention. Any owner or operator of a commercial or industrial establishment shall provide, at their own expense, reasonable protection from accidental discharge of prohibited materials or other wastes into the municipal storm drain system or watercourses through the use of structural and non-structural BMPs. Further, any person responsible for a property or premise, which is, or may be, the source of an illicit 1/2 5/10/22,4:39 PM Jefferson City, MO Code of Ordinances discharge, may be required to implement, at said person's expense, additional structural and non-structural BMPs to prevent the further discharge of pollutants to the municipal separate storm sewer system. Compliance with all terms and conditions of a valid NPDES permit authorizing the discharge of storm water associated with industrial activity, to the extent practicable, shall be deemed compliant with the provisions of this section. These BMPs shall be part of a stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPP) as necessary for compliance with requirements ofthe NPDES permit. 2/2 StevenS. Crowell , Jr. City Administrator 320 E . McCarty Street Jefferson City, MO 65101 Phone Number: (573) 634 -6306 Email : SCrowell@jeffcitymo.org MEMORANDUM To: From: Date : Re: Mayor and City Council cc: Department Directors StevenS. Crowell, Jr., City Administrator March 29 , 2022 American Rescue Plan Act Discussion April 4, 2022 At the March 21 , 2022 meeting of the Mayor and City Council , the City Council decided to discuss at the April 4 , 2022 City Council meeting proposed funding of the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds the City has been awarded. As you recall, the City was awarded $7 ,586 ,581, one half of which we have received, and of that amount, $790 ,917.60 was allocated by the City Council for stormwater improvements in the FY22 budget. The attached Excel spreadsheet is organized into two sections: (I) "Suggested Areas of Focus " for funding , and (II) "Potential Projects/Expenditures ," to include: encumbered/spent, personnel, operational expenditure reimbursements/payments , operations , City facilities , vehicles , equipment, other organizations funding requests , and capital projects/other expenditures. The "Suggested Areas of Focus" are intended to assist the Mayor and City Council in prioritizing your expenditure allocations . The areas of focus are not ARPA requirements and can be changed or not considered as the Mayor and City Council deem appropriate. The "Potential Projects/Expenditures" are offered as a means to assist the Mayor and City Council in prioritizing your decisions; the categories are not required by ARPA. Many, but not all , of the capital expenditures which have been identified during the recent years are noted. Several of the capital projects which are anticipated to be funded by other means , such as sales tax , are not represented. Included are a few projects which may have been discussed as being funded through a particular funding source , such as body cameras from Public Safety Sales Tax; those items are on the ARPA list to ensure the specific items are addressed. Some expenditures may be eligible for infrastructure grant funding or are currently included in a grant process or pending consideration, such as the Monroe Street project. The capital items included in the FY22 budget which were not funded (i .e ., "Pink Sheets ") are highlighted on the attached in pink. 1 Attached is the Coronavirus State & Local Physical Recovery Funds: Overview of the Final Rule. According to the Final Rule, recipients may use State and Local Physical Recovery Funds (ARPA) funds to: a. Replace lost public sector revenue with a "standard allowance" of up to $10 million in aggregate. In regard to this item, the aggregate amount of funding we anticipate receiving through this round of ARPA funding will be less than $10 million. I recognize the Mayor and City Council are aware of the fact that during the pandemic, when we ·purchased pandemic related supplies/services, continued operations and continued to implement some projects when revenues were reduced, essentially, we were using fund balance or "unexpended budget" to fund those activities. Without a "reimbursement" of those expended funds, technically these expenditures would remain as a reduction in fund balance or budget. b. Support the COVID-19 public health and economic response by addressing COVID-19 and its impact on public health as well as addressing economic harms to households, small businesses, non-profits, impacted industries, and the public sector. c. Provide premium pay for eligible workers performing essential work. d. Invest in water, sewer (which includes storm water), and broadband infrastructure. I presume Council will want to discuss projects and categories in more detail at the meeting, so I have not provided an explanation of each potential expenditure item here. I do want to point out a few specific items: 1. Essential Worker Pay Essential worker compensation would be recognition for all those full-time employees who continue to work through the pandemic. The number reflected on the attached is based on a lump sum payment of $5,000 to all full-time employees; obviously that number can be adjusted. Perhaps consideration should be given to including part-time employees at some level of renumeration as well. Numerous other cities, including Cole County, have already authorized essential worker compensation. 2. Self-funded Insurance This would be a contribution to the City self-funded insurance account. As we discussed during the last several budget years, our self-insurance amount was diminished mostly due to a few high cost individual cases. Our health insurance rates include a component for rebuilding this self-insurance amount. An allocation directly to the self-insurance account, which is directly related to health insurance, would allow the rates for 2 employees (including the City's contribution) to be kept at a lower level than what would be realized without the contribution. 3. Revenue loss (enterprise funds/uses) I think it is important to remember the enterprise funds/uses are designated for specific purposes and in many instances are solely supported by user fees (e.g., Parking) or partially supported by event fees and perhaps sales tax (e.g., Convention and Visitors Bureau). Some of these funds/uses may include specific projects such as a parking garage or the convention center. Reimbursing these lost revenues would have a direct impact on funding for the services projects referenced. • I can understand and appreciate the interest in having ''transformational" projects funded; however, I do reiterate the need for recognizing employees for the work they continue to perform and stabilizing some of the funding impacts the City has experienced during the pandemic (i.e., revenue loss) as well as addressing deferred maintenance or deferred projects. My recommendation would be for the City Council to discuss the focus areas and/or projects you wish to have funded within the parameters of the ARPA guidelines and funding the amount we anticipate receiving. Upon receiving the direction from the City Council, staff could prepare a fmal ARPA spending plan for the City Council adoption, presumably at a later meeting. 3 CITY OF JEFFERSON AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT FUNDS POTENTIAL EXPENDITURE/PROJECT LIST ONE-TIME Expenditures (not ongoing expenditures) I. Suggested Areas of Focus: 1 Essential Worker Compensation. 2 Reimburse City lost/outstanding revenue. 3 Reimburse for COVID related City expenditures. 4 Purchase COVID health related equipment for City. 5 Reimburse component units of government for revenue loss (i.e., Convention and Visitors Bureau). Grants may be available. 6 Make COVID related facility improvements (e.g., HVAC, electronic messaging). 7 Stabilize fund balance contributions benefitting employees (e.g., health insurance). 8 Reserve some funds for project (state) matching funds. 10 Infrastructure projects, emphasis on stormwater and street repairs. 11 Contribution to identified social service organizations: providing COVID related services, housing, homelessness. 12 Payment to City of customer outstanding sewer bills. 11. Potential Projects/Expendidtures. ONE-TIME Expenditures (not ongoing expenditures). NOT IN PRIORITY ORDER (Expected ARPA award: $7,586,581.00) A. Encumbered/Spent 1 Stormwater (FY22 Budget) B. Personnel: 1 Lump Sum Payment to LAGERS for Police & Fire for unfunded liability payout 2 Essential Worker Compensation Benefit-based on $5,000 lump sum allocation to fulltime employees. Subtotal C. Operational Expenditure Reimbursements/Payments: 1 Self-funded insurance fund (catchup allocation) 2 Convention and Visitors Bureau, revenue reduction 3 COVID sick and quarantine leave reimbursement 4 ARPA Administrative fee 5 Single audit expense 6 Workers Compensation account reimbursement 7 Wastewater delinquency write off 8 General fund revenue reduction $2,300,000.00 ~$2,150,000.00 $2,300,000.00 $1,000,000.00 $175,000.00 $234,967.80 $758,685.00 $26,000.00 $200,000.00 $98,061.43 $7,000.00 Page 1 of 6 CITY OF JEFFERSON AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT FUNDS POTENTIAL EXPENDITURE/PROJECT LIST ONE-TIME Expenditures (not ongoing expenditures) 9 Parking revenue reduction: 2021 10 Parking revenue reduction: 2020 11 Airport revenue reduction 12 Convention Center revenue reduction Subtotal $264,630.66 $247,026.21 $9,565.27 $468,978.13 $3,489,914.50 Page 2 of6 CITY OF JEFFERSON AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT FUNDS POTENTIAL EXPENDITURE/PROJECT LIST ONE-TIME Expenditures (not ongoing expenditures) D. Operations: 1 Employment Marketing Awareness Campaign 2 Strategic Digital Marketing 3 Asset/Work Order Management System (Public Works) 4 Data Storage (SAN) potential for other Information Technology projects 5 CALEA Accreditation Fees (Police and 911) 6 Fire Accreditation Documents 7 Establish a community foundation Subtotal E. City Facilities: 1 Police Station Locker Room Renovation (ADA) 2 Door Access System 3 Police Station Elevator Replacement 4 Fire: Hyde Park Burn Building Replacement 5 Fire: Retrofit Fire Sprinkler Station 5 6 Fire: Retrofit Fire Sprinkler Station 1 7 Demo Church by Police Station (415 Moinroe) 8 Demo Public Works Sroreage/Oid Animal Shelter (919 Miller) 9 Replace HVAC City Hall: Unit 4 10 Upgrade HVAC City Hall: all units Previous amount $132,000 11 New Communications Building (colocation with Cole County EMS?) posible participation with County/Lincoln 12 Automatic/motion activated restroom sinks 13 Administration/HR/Law office reconfiguration for HIPAA compliance/confidentiality 14 Fleet alternative fuel acquisition/conversion analysis (consultant) 15 Renewable energy facility analysis and implementation plan (consultant) $14,400 .00 $60,000.00 $35,000.00 $275,000.00 $60,000.00 $90,000 .00 staff time $534,400.00 $150,000.00 $100,000.00 $200,000.00 $1,925 ,000.00 $38,335.00 $48,905.00 $35,000 .00 $70,000.00 $25,000.00 Need estimate $5,000,000.00 $3,000.00 $50,000.00 Page 3 of 6 Subtotal F. Vehicles : CITY OF JEFFERSON AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT FUNDS POTENTIAL EXPENDITURE/PROJECT LIST ONE-TIME Expenditures (not ongoing expenditures) 1 Police Vehicles (11 x $44A17) 2 Fire-Annual$ 2028 Fleet Replacement Pay-forward 3 Fire ATV w/Skid 4 Fire Dept Shift Supervisor Response Previous amount $47A56 5 Aircraft Rescue & Fire Fighting Truck (Grant) 6 Public Works-Replace Heavy Duty Service Truck 7 Public Works -Replace Light Duty Service Truck 8 Public Works-Replace 8-1 ton Heavy Duty Trucks 9 Public Works-Replace Two Street Sweepers 10 Public Works-Replace 5-/4 Ton w/Service Body 11 Public Works -Replace 2-Tandem Axle Dump Trucks 12 Public Works-Street Marking/Paint Truck 13 Public Works-Replace Two Skid Steers 14 Public Works-Replace 2-3/4 Ton Pickups 15 Public Works-Replace Eight Traffic Signal Cabinets 16 Public Works-Replace 4-Single Axle Dump Truck 17 Public Works-8Ft Brush Hog 18 Streets -Replacement Street Lights 19 Streets -Electric Concrete Core Drill 20 Streets-Walk Behind Roller/Compactor 21 Airport-Ford F-150 with Utility Bed and Plow 22 Convert Fleet to Biodiesel or Alternative Energy Subtotal G. Equipment: 1 Police Body/In-Car Cameras (initially $475,000) 2 Fire-NFPA 3000 Ballistic Protection 3 Fire Hose Replacement (AFG Grant Pending) 4 Animal Control-Mobile Data Terminals (4@ $5,208) 5 Public Works-Replace Two Changeable Message Boards 6 Public Works-Upgrade to Cameras On Signals Previous amount $ 665,000 PS Tax? $7,645,240 .00 $488,587.00 $300,000.00 $39,500.00 $57,000.00 $769,000.00 $56,000.00 $46,000.00 $608,000.00 $430,000.00 $275,000.00 $495,000 .00 $1601000 • 00 $130,000 .00 $90,000.00 $56,000 .00 $540,000.00 $8,000.00 $12,000.00 $4,000 .00 $5,000 .00 $76,000.00 $635,000.00 $75,000.00 $100,835.00 $20,832.00 $34,000.00 $40,000.00 Page 4 of 6 CITY OF JEFFERSON AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT FUNDS POTENTIAL EXPENDITURE/PROJECT LIST ONE-TIME Expenditures (not ongoing expenditures) 7 Police-44 Motorola APX8500 Mobile Radios Previous amount 8 Fire Department mobile and portable radios 9 License Plate Readers (4) 10 Emergency Services Combined Communications Analysis (1/2 costs with County) Subtotal H. Other Organizations: Requests from Public Input Meeting February 21, 2022/written comments: 1 Lincoln University-Health Sciences and Crisis Center (matching contribution) 2 Special Learning Center-Programs 3 Chamber of Commerce-No Specified Amount Identified 4 Convention and Visitors Bureau 5 River City Habitat for Humanity (affordable housing) 6 Salvation Army (homelessness assistance) 7 United Capital City Soccer Club (soccer complex) 8 Transformation Housing (affordable housing) 9 Transformation Housing-No Specified Amount Identified 10 Citizen-Bob Gilbert-Infrastructure-No Specified Amount Identified 11 Citizen-Jeff Holzem-Electric Buses and Fleet Vehicles-No Specified Amount Identified 12 Citizen-Jeff Holzem -Solar Power for City Facilities-No Specified Amount Identified $220,000 13 Citizen -Ed Rackers-Stormwater Detention Washington Park Area -No Specified Amount Identified 14 Citizen-Ann Bloemke-Warren -Sidewalks Thorpe Gordon & East Schools-No Specified Amount Identified 15 Citizen-Ann Teske-Infrastructure-No Specified Amount Identified 16 Citizen-Frank Rycyk-Create Endowment Fund Subtotal (less item 16) Other Potential Organiations: 1 Lincoln University Law Enforcement Training Academy {law enforcement} 2 Lincoln Business Incubator contribution {economic development} 3 United Way {rental assistance, housing} 4 Central Missouri Community Action {affordable housing} 5 Rape and Abuse Crisis Service 6 Diaper Bank 7 Others????????? $237,800.00 $200,000.00 $70,500.00 $40,000.00 $1,453,967 .00 $500,000.00 $250,000.00 ?? (see above) $500,000.00 $3,500,000.00 $500,000 .00 $500,000 .00 $500,000.00 ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? $6,795,663.40 $6,250,000.00 Page 5 of 6 CITY OF JEFFERSON AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT FUNDS POTENTIAL EXPENDITURE/PROJECT LIST ONE-TIME Expenditures (not ongoing expenditures) I. Capital Projects/Other Expenditures: 1 Increase Funding for Demolitions 2 East Capitol Redevelopment Project 3 Ohio Street Bridge 4 Reserve for CIP Projects (grant) Matching Funds 5 Parks, Recreation and Forestry, various projects 6 Street Overlays (~$1,300,000 per year) 7 Floodplain map updates 8 East Miller Stormwater Box Culvert (Coca-to Wear's Creek) 9 Broadway Street-Elevate from Hwy 50/63 to McCarty St 10 Stormwater, various-Census Tract 106 11 Stormwater, various-Census Tract 207 12 Sanitary Sewer-Replace Basin 7 (near Sunbelt Rental to Duane Swift Hwy) 13 Sanitary Sewer-East Branch Wear's Creek, Mill Bottom to Marshall St 14 Sanitary Sewer Replacement-St. Mary's Blvd 15 Monroe Street Sales tax and $1,310,240 in pending grant application 16 Missouri State Penitentiary public infrastructure 17 Fire Station 6 construction 18 Wears Creek Improvements 19 Contribution to Port Authority 20 General Allocation for Economic Development Projects 21 General Allocation for Small Business Assistance 22 Demolition of Truman Hotel/Old Ramada Inn 23 Mission Drive improvements 24 Install Solar Powered Streetlights in Neighborhoods 25 Elevator, Fire Museum Subtotal Total FUNDS ALREADY OBLIGATED FROM FY2022 BUDGET-UNFUNDED PINK SHEET ITEMS FROM PUBLIC INPUT SESSION & WRITIEN COMMENTS Grant available? $130,000.00 575000 .00 $750,000.00 $1,000,000.00 Any amount Any amount $3,000,000.00 $760,000.00 $1,500,000.00 $1,500,000.00 $1,600,000.00 $3,200,000.00 $500,000.00 $3,497,000.00 Any Amount $4,000,000.00 Grant? Grant? $1,000,000 .00 Ameren $100,000.00 $23,112,000.00 $49,43o,Gos.so 1 Page 6 of 6 January 2022 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREA SURY The Overview of the Final Rule provides a summary of major provisions of t he final rule for informational purposes and is intended as a brief, simplified user guide to the final rule provisions. The descriptions provided in this document summarize key provisions of the final rule but are non-exhaustive, do not describe all terms and conditions associated with the use of SLFRF, and do not describe all requirements that may apply to this funding. Any SLFRF funds received are also subject to the terms and conditions of the agreement entered into by Treasury and the respective jurisdiction, which incorporate the provisions of the final rule and the guidance that implements this program. Coronavirus State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: Overview of the Final Rule U.S. Department of the Treasury 2 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TRE ASUR Y Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 4 Overv iew of the Program .............................................................................................................................. 6 Replacing Lost Public Sector Revenue .......................................................................................................... 9 Responding to Public Health and Economic Impacts of COVID-19 ............................................................. 12 Responding to the Public Health Emergency .......................................................................................... 14 Responding to Negative Economic Impacts ............................................................................................ 16 Assistance to Households ................................................................................................................... 17 Assistance to Small Businesses ........................................................................................................... 21 Assistance t o Non profits ..................................................................................................................... 23 Aid t o Impacted Industries .................................................................................................................. 24 Public Sector Capacity ............................................................................................................................. 26 Public Safety, Public Health, and Human Services Staff ..................................................................... 26 Government Employment and Rehiring Public Sector Staff ............................................................... 27 Effective Service Delivery .................................................................................................................... 28 Capital Expenditures ............................................................................................................................... 30 Framework for Eligib le Uses Beyond those Enumerated ....................................................................... 32 Premium Pay ............................................................................................................................................... 35 Water & Sewe r Infrastructure .................................................................................................................... 37 Broadband Infrastructure ........................................................................................................................... 39 Restrictions on Use ..................................................................................................................................... 41 Program Administration ............................................................................................................................. 43 Coronavirus State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: Overview of the Final Rule U.S . Department of the Treasury 3 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Introduction The Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF), a part of the American Rescue Plan, delivers $350 billion to state, local, and Tribal governments across the country to support their response to and recovery from the COVID-19 public health emergency . The program ensures that governments have the resources needed to: • Fight the pandemic and support families and businesses struggling with its public health and economic impacts, • Maintain vital public services, even amid declines in revenue, and • Build a strong, resilient, and equitable recovery by making investments that support long-term growth and opportunity. EARLY PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION In May 2021, Treasury published the Interim final rule (IFR) describing eligible and ineligible uses of funds (as well as other program provisions), sought feedback from the public on these program rules, and began to distribute funds. The IFR went immediately into effect in May, and since then, governments have used SLFRF funds to meet their immediate pandemic response needs and begin building a strong and equitable recovery, such as through providing vaccine incentives, development of affordable housing, and construction of infrastructure to deliver safe and reliable water. As governments began to deploy this funding in their communities, Treasury carefully considered the feedback provided through its public comment process and other forums. Treasury received over 1,500 comments, participated in hundreds of meetings, and received correspondence from a wide range of governments and other stakeholders. KEY CHANGES AND CLARIFICATIONS IN THE FINAL RULE The final rule delivers broader flexibility and greater simplicity in the program, responsive to feedback in the comment process . Among other clarifications and changes, the final rule provides the features below. Rep l acing Lost Pu blic Sector Revenue The final rule offers a standard allowance for revenue loss of up to $10 million, allowing recipients to select between a standard amount of revenue loss or complete a full revenue loss calculation . Recipients that select the standard allowance may use that amount-in many cases their full award-for government serv ices, with streamlined repo rting requirements . Public Health and Economic Impacts In addition to programs and services, the final rule clarifies that recipients can use funds for capital expenditures that support an eligible COVID-19 public health or economic response. For example, recipients may build certain affordable housing, childcare facilities, schools, hospitals, and other projects consistent with final rule requirements. Coronavirus State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: Overview of the Final Rule U.S. Department of the Treasury 4 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY In addition, the final rule provides an expanded set of households and communities that are presumed to be "impacted" and "disproportionately impacted" by the pandemic, thereby allowing recipients to provide responses to a broad set of households and entities without requiring additional analysis . Further, the final rule provides a broader set of uses available for these communities as part of COVID- 19 public health and economic response, including making affordable housing, childcare, early learning, and services to address learning loss during the pandemic eligible in all impacted communities and making certain community development and neighborhood revitalization activities eligible for disproportionately impacted communities . Further, the final rule allows for a broader set of uses to restore and support government employment, including hiring above a recipient's pre-pandemic baseline, providing funds to employees that experienced pay cuts or furloughs, avoiding layoffs, and providing retention incentives. Premium Pay The final rule delivers more streamlined options to provide premium pay, by broadening the share of eligible workers who can receive premium pay without a written justification while maintaining a focus on lower-income and frontline workers performing essential work. Water, Sewer & Broadband Infrastructure The final rule significantly broadens eligible broadband infrastructure investments to address challenges with broadband access, affordability, and reliability, and adds additional eligible water and sewer infrastructure investments, including a broader range of lead remediation and stormwater management projects . FINAL RULE EFFECTIVE DATE The final rule takes effect on Aprill, 2022. Until that time, the interim final rule remains in effect; funds used consistently with the IFR while it is in effect are i n compliance with the SLFRF program. However, recipients can choose to take advantage of the final rule's flexibilities and simplifications now, even ahead of the effective date. Treasury will not take action to enforce the interim final rule to the extent that a use of funds is consistent with the terms of the final rule, regardless of when the SLFRF funds were used. Recipients may consult the Statement Regarding Compliance with the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Interim Final Rule and Final Rule, which can be found on Treasury's website, for more information on compliance with the interim final rule and the final rule . Coronavirus State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: Overview of the Final Rule U.S . Department of the Treasury 5 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Overview of the Program The Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) program provides substantial flexib i lity for each jurisdiction to meet local needs within the four separate eligible use categories. This Overview of the Final Rule addresses the four eligible use categories ordered from the broadest and most flexible to the most specific. Recipients may use SLFRF funds to: Replace lost public sector revenue, using this funding to provide government services up to the amount of revenue loss due to the pandemic. Recipients may determine their revenue loss by choosing between two options: A standard allowance of up to $10 million in aggregate, not to exceed their award amount, during the program; Calculating their jurisdiction's specific revenue loss each year using Treasury's formula, which compares actual revenue to a counterfactual trend . Recipients may use funds up to the amount of revenue loss for government services; generally, services traditionally provided by recipient governments are government services, unless Treasury has stated otherwise. Support the COVID-19 public health and economic response by addressing COVID-19 and its impact on public health as well as addressing economic harms to households, small businesses, non profits, impacted industries, and the public sector. Recipients can use funds for programs, services, or capital expenditures that respond to the public health and negative economic impacts of the pandemic. To provide simple and clear eligible uses of funds, Treasury provides a list of enumerated uses that recipients can provide to households, populations, or classes (i.e ., groups) that experienced pandemic impacts . Public health eligible uses include COVID-19 mitigation and prevention, medical expenses, behavioral healthcare, and preventing and responding to violence. Eligible uses to respond to negative economic impacts are organized by the type of beneficiary: assistance to households, small businesses, and non profits. Each category includes assistance for "impacted" and "disproportionately impacted" classes: impacted classes experienced the general, broad-based impacts of the pandemic, while disproportionately impacted classes faced meaningfully more severe impacts, often due to preexisting disparities . To simplify administration, the final rule presumes that some populations and groups were impacted or disproportionately impacted and are eligible for responsive services . Coronavirus State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: Overview of the Final Rule U.S. Department of the Treasury 6 U .S. DEPARTMENT OF T HE TREASURY Eligible uses for assistance to impacted households include aid for re- employment, job training, food, rent, mortgages, utilities, affordable housing development, childcare, early education, addressing learning loss, and many more uses. Eligible uses for assistance to impacted small businesses or non profits include loans or grants to mitigate financial hardship, technical assistance for small businesses, and many more uses. Recipients can also provide assistance to impacted industries like travel, tourism, and hospitality that faced substantial pandemic impacts, or address impacts to the public sector, for example by re-hiring public sector workers cut during the crisis. Recipients providing funds for enumerated uses to populations and groups that Treasury has presumed eligible are clearly operating consistently with the final rule. Recipients can also identify (1) other populations or groups, beyond those presumed eligible, that experienced pandemic impacts or disproportionate impacts and (2) other programs, services, or capital expenditures, beyond those enumerated, to respond to those impacts . Provide premium pay for eligible workers performing essential work, offering additional support to those who have and will bear the greatest health risks because of their service in critical sectors . Recipients may provide premium pay to eligible workers-generally those working in- person in key economic sectors-who are below a wage threshold or non-exempt from the Fair Labor Standards Act overtime provisions, or if the recipient submits justification that the premium pay is responsive to workers performing essential work. Invest in water, sewer, and broadband infrastructure, making necessary investments to improve access to clean drinking water, to support vi t al wastewater and stormwater infrastructure, and to expand affordable access to broadband internet. Recipients may fund a broad range of water and sewer projects, including those eligible under the EPA's Clean Water State Revolving Fund, EPA's Drinking Water State Revolving Fund, and certain additional projects, including a wide set of lead remediation, stormwater infrastructure, and aid for private wells and septic units. Recipients may fund high-speed broadband infrastructure in areas of need that the recipient identifies, such as areas without access to adequate speeds , affordable options, or where connections are inconsistent or unreliable; completed projects must participate in a low-income subsidy program. While recipients have considerable flexibility to use funds to address the diverse needs of their communities, some restrictions on use apply across all eligible use categories. These include: • For states and territories: No offsets of a reduction in net tax revenue resulting from a change in state or territory law. Coronavirus State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: Overview of the Final Rule U.S. Department of the Treasury 7 U .S. DEPARTMENT OF T HE TREASURY • For all recipients except for Tribal governments: No extraordinary contributions to a pension fund for the purpose of reducing an accrued, unfunded liability. • For all recipients: No payments for debt service and replenishments of rainy day funds; no satisfaction of settlements and judgments; no uses that contravene or violate the American Rescue Plan Act, Uniform Guidance conflicts of interest requirements, and other federal, state, and local laws and regulations. Under the SLFRF program, funds must be used for costs incurred on or after March 3, 2021. Further, funds must be obligated by December 31, 2024, and expended by December 31, 2026. This time period, during which recipients can expend SLFRF funds, is the "period of performance." In addition to SLFRF, the American Rescue Plan includes other sources of funding for state and local governments, including the Coronavirus Capital Projects Fund to fund critical capital investments including broadband infrastructure; the Homeowner Assistance Fund to provide relief for our country's most vulnerable homeowners; the Emergency Rental Assistance Program to assist households that are unable to pay rent or utilities; and the State Small Business Credit Initiative to fund small business credit expansion initiatives. Eligible recipients are encouraged to visit the Treasury website for more information. Coronavirus State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: Overview of the Final Rule U.S. Department of the Treasury 8 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF T HE TREASURY Replacing Lost Public Sector Revenue The Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds provide needed fiscal relief for recipients that have experienced revenue loss due to the onset ofthe COVID-19 public health emergency. Specifically, SLFRF funding may be used to pay for "government services" in an amount equal to the revenue loss experienced by the recipient due to the COVID-19 public health emergency. Government services generally include any service traditionally provided by a government, including construction of roads and other infrastructure, provision of public safety and other services, and health and educational services. Funds spent under government services are subject to streamlined reporting and compliance requirements. In order to use funds under government services, recipients should first determine revenue loss. They may, then, spend up to that amount on general government services . DETERMINING REVENUE LOSS Recipients have two options for how to determine their amount of revenue loss. Recipients must choose one of the two options and cannot switch between these approaches after an election is made. 1. Recipients may elect a "standard allowance" of $10 million to spend on government services through the period of performance. Under this option, which is newly offered in the final rule Treasury presumes that up to $10 million in revenue has been lost due to the public health emergency and recipients are permitted to use that amount (not to exceed the award amount) to fund "government services." The standard allowance provides an estimate of revenue loss that is based on an extensive analysis of average revenue loss across states and localities, and offers a simple, convenient way to determine revenue loss, particularly for SLFRF's smallest recipients . All recipients may elect to use this standard allowance instead of calculating lost revenue using the formula below, including those with total allocations of $10 million or less . Electing the standard allowance does not increase or decrease a recipient's total allocation. 2. Recipients may calculate their actual revenue loss according to the formula articulated in the final rule. Under this option, recipients calculate revenue loss at four distinct points in time, either at the end of each calendar year (e.g., December 31 for years 2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023) or the end of each fiscal year of the recipient. Under the flexibility provided in the final rule, recipients can choose whether to use calendar or fiscal year dates but must be consistent throughout the period of performance. Treasury has also provided several adjustments to the definition of general revenue in the final rule . To calculate revenue loss at each of these dates, recipients must follow a four-step process: Coronav irus State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: Overview of the Final Rule U.S . Department of the Treasury 9 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY a. Calculate revenues collected in the most recent full fiscal year prior t o the public health emergency (i .e., last full fiscal year before January 27, 2020), called the base year revenue. b. Estimate counterfactual revenue, which is equal to the following formula, where n is the number of months elapsed since the end of the base year to the calculation date: n base year revenue x (1 +growth adjustment)l z The growth adjustment is the greater of either a standard growth rate-5.2 percent-or the recipient's average annual revenue growth in the last full three fiscal years prior to the COVID-19 public health emergency. c. Identify actual revenue, which equals revenues collected over the twelve months immediately preceding the calculation date. Under the final rule, recipients must adjust actual revenue totals for the effect of tax cuts and tax increases that are adopted after the date of adoption of the final rule (January 6, 2022). Specifically, the estimated fiscal impact of tax cuts and tax increases adopted after January 6, 2022, must be added or subtracted to the calculation of actual revenue for purposes of calculation dates that occur on o r after Aprill, 2022. Recipients may subtract from their calculation of actual revenue the effect of tax inc r eases enacted p r ior to the adoption of the final rule. Note that recipients that elect to remove the effect of tax i nc reases enacted before the adoption of the final rule must also remove the effect of ta x decreases enacted before the adoption of the final rule, such that they are accurately removing the effect of tax policy changes on revenue . d. Revenue loss for the calculation date is equal to counterfactual revenue minus actual revenue (adjusted for tax changes) for the twelve-month period. If actual revenue exceeds counterfactual revenue , the loss is set to zero for that twelve-month period . Revenue loss for the period of performance is the sum of the revenue loss on for each calculation date. The supplementary information in the final rule provides an example of this calculation, which recipients may find helpful, in the Revenue Loss section. Coronavirus State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: Overview of the Final Rule U.S . Department of the Treasury 10 e U.S. DEPAR TM ENT OF TH E TREASURY SPENDING ON GOVERNMENT SERVICES Recipients can use SLFRF funds on government services up to the revenue loss amount, whether that be the standard allowance amount or the amount calculated using the above approach. Government services generally include any service traditionally provided by a government, unless Treasury has stated otherwise. Here are some common examples, although this list is not exhaustive: ./ Construction of schools and hospitals ./ Road building and maintenance, and other infrastructure ./ Health services ./ General government administration, staff, and administrative facilities ./ Environmental remediation ./ Provision of police, fire, and other public safety services (including purchase of fire trucks and police vehicles) Government services is the most flexible eligible use category under the SLFRF program, and funds are subject to streamlined reporting and compliance requirements. Recipients should be mindful that certain restrictions, which are detailed further in the Restrictions on Use section and apply to all uses of funds, apply to government services as well. Corona virus State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: Overview of the Final Rule U.S. Department of the Treasury 11 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Responding to Public Health and Econo m ic Impacts of COV ID-1 9 The Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds provide resources for governments to meet the public health and economic needs of those impacted by the pandemic in their communities, as well as address longstanding health and economic disparities, which amplified the impact of the pandemic in disproportionately impacted communities, resulting in more severe pandemic impacts. The eligible use category to respond to public health and negative economic impacts is organized around the types of assistance a recipient may provide and includes several sub-categories: • public health, • assistance to households, • assistance to small businesses, • assistance to non profits, • aid to impacted industries, and • public sector capacity . In general, to identify eligible uses of funds in this category, recipients should (1) identify a COVID-19 public health or economic impact on an individual or class (i.e., a group) and (2) design a program that responds to t hat impact. Responses should be related and reasonably proportional to the harm identified and reasonably designed to benefit those impacted. To provide simple, clear eligible uses of funds that meet this standard, Treasury provides a non- exhaustive list of enumerated uses that respond to pandemic impacts. Treasury also presumes that some populations experienced pandemic impacts and are eligible for responsive services . In other words, recipients providing enumerated uses of funds to populations presumed eligible are clearly operating consistently with the final ru le.1 Recipients also have broad flexibility to (1) identify and respond to other pandemic impacts and (2) serve other populations that experienced pandemic impacts, beyond the enumerated uses and presumed eligible populations . Recipients can also identify groups or "classes" of beneficiaries that experienced pandemic impacts and provide services to those classes. 1 However, please note that use of funds for enumerated uses may not be grossly disproportionate to the harm. Further, recipients should consult the Cap ital Expenditures section for more information about pursuing a capital ex penditure; please note that enumerated capital expenditures are not presumed to be rea sonably proportional responses to an identified harm except as provided in the Capital Ex penditures section. Coronavirus State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: Overview of the Final Rule U.S. Department of the Treasury 12 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Step 1. Identify COVID-19 public health or 2. Design a response that addresses or economic impact responds to the impact Analysis Can identify impact to a specific • Types of responses can include a • household, business or nonprofit or program, service, or capital to a class of households, businesses, expenditure or non profits (i.e., group) • Response should be related and • Can also identify disproportionate reasonably proportional to the harm impacts, or more severe impacts, to • Response should also be reasonably a specific beneficiary or to a class designed to benefit impacted individual or class Simplifying Final Rule presumes certain • Final Rule provides non-exhaustive • Presumptions populations and classes are impacted list of enumerated eligible uses that and disproportionately impacted respond to pandemic impacts and disproportionate impacts To assess eligibility of uses of funds, recipients should first determine the sub-category where their use of funds may fit (e.g., public health, assistance to households, assistance to small businesses), based on the entity that experienced the health or economic impact.2 Then, recipients should refer to the relevant section for more details on each sub-category. While the same overall eligibility standard applies to all uses of funds to respond to the public health and negative economic impacts of the pandemic, each sub-category has specific nuances on its application. In addition: • Recipients interested in using funds for capital expenditures (i.e., investments in property, facilities, or equipment) should review the Capital Expenditures section in addition to the eligible use sub-category. • Recipients interested in other uses of funds, beyond the enumerated uses, should refer to the section on "Framework for Eligible Uses Beyond Those Enumerated." 2 For example, a recipient interested in providing aid to unemployed individuals is addressing a negative economic impact experienced by a household and should refer to the section on assistance to households. Recipients shou ld also be aware of the d ifference between "beneficiaries" and "sub-recipients." Beneficiaries are households, small businesses, or nonprofits that can receive assistance based on impacts of the pandemic that they experienced. On the other hand, sub-recipients are organizations that carry out eligible uses on behalf of a government, often through grants or contracts. Sub-recipients do not need to have experienced a negative economic impact of the pandemic; rather, they are providing services to beneficiaries that experienced an impact. Coronavirus State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: Overview of the Final Rule U.S . Depart ment of t he Treasury 13 e US. DEP ARTMEN T OF THE TREASURY RESPONDING TO T HE PUBLIC HEAlTH EMERGENCY While the country has made tremendous progress in the fight against COVID-19, including a historic vaccination campaign, the disease still poses a grave threat to Americans' health and the economy. Providing state, local, and Tribal governments the resources needed to fight the COVID-19 pandemic is a core goal of the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, as well as addressing the other ways that the pandemic has impacted public health . Treasury has identified several public health impacts of the pandemic and enumerated uses of funds to respond to impacted populations. COVID-19 mitigation and prevention. The pandemic has broadly impacted Americans and recipients can provide services to prevent and mitigate COVID-19 to the general public or to small businesses, nonprofits, and impacted industries in general. Enumerated eligible uses include: / Vaccination programs, including vaccine incentives and vaccine sites / Testing programs, equipment and sites ../ Monitoring, contact tracing & public health surveillance (e.g ., monitoring for variants) ../ Public communication efforts ../ Public health data systems ../ COVID-19 prevention and treatment equipment, such as ventilators and ambulances ../ Medical and PPE/protective supplies ../ Support for isolation or quarantine ../ Ventilation system installation and i mprovement ../ Technical assistance on mitigation of COVID-19 threats to public health and safety ../ Transportation to reach vaccination or testing sites, or other prevention and mitigation services for vulnerable populations ../ Support for prevention, mitigation, or other services in congregate living facilities, public facilities, and schools ../ Support for prevention and mitigation strategies in small businesses, nonprofits, and impacted industries ./ Medical facilities generally dedicated to COVID-19 treatment and mitigation (e .g., ICUs, emergency rooms) ../ Temporary medical facilities and other measures to increase COVID-19 treatment capacity ./ Emergency operations centers & emergency response equipment (e .g., emergency response radio systems) ../ Public telemedicine capabilities for COVID- 19 related treatment Coronavirus State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: Overview of the Final Rule U.S. Department of the Treasury 14 U.S . DEPARTMENT OF THE TREA SUR Y Medical expenses. Funds may be used for expenses to households, medical providers, or others that incurred medical costs due to the pandemic, including: ../ Unreimbursed expenses for medical care for COVID-19 testing or treatment, such as uncompensated care costs for medical providers or out-of-pocket costs for individuals ../ Paid family and medical leave for public employees to enable compliance with COVID-19 public health precautions ../ Emergency medical response expenses ../ Treatment of long-term symptoms or effects of COVID-19 Behavioral health care, such as mental health treatment, substance use treatment, and other behavioral health services. Treasury recognizes that the pandemic has broadly impacted Americans' behavioral health and recipients can provide these services to the general public to respond. Enumerated eligible uses include: ../ Prevention, outpatient treatment, ../ Support for equitable access to reduce inpatient treatment, crisis care, disparities in access to high-quality diversion programs, outreach to treatment individuals not yet engaged in ../ Peer support groups, costs for residence in treatment, harm reduction & long-term supportive housing or recovery housing, and recovery support the 988 National Suicide Prevention Lifeline ../ Enhanced behavioral health services in or other hotline services schools ../ Expansion of access to evidence-based ../ Services for pregnant women or infants services for opioid use disorder prevention, born with neonatal abstinence treatment, harm reduction, and recovery syndrome ../ Behavioral health facilities & equipment Preventing and responding to violence. Recognizing that violence-and especially gun violence- has increased in some communities due to the pandemic, recipients may use funds to respond in these communities through: ../ Referrals to trauma recovery services for victims of crime ../ Community violence intervention programs, including: • Evidence-based practices like focused deterrence, with wraparound services such as behavioral therapy, trauma recovery, job training, education, housing and relocation services, and financial assistance ../ In communities experiencing increased gun violence due to the pandemic: • Law enforcement officers focused on advancing community policing • Enforcement efforts to reduce gun violence, including prosecution • Technology & equipment to support law enforcement response Corona virus State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: Overview of the Final Rule U.S. Department of the Treasury 15 U.S . DEPARTMENT OF THE TRE AS UR Y RESPONDING TO NEGATIVE ECONOMIC IMPACTS The pandemic caused severe economic damage and, while the economy is on track to a strong recovery, much work remains to continue building a robust, resilient, and equitable economy in the wake of the crisis and to ensure that the benefits of this recovery reach all Americans. While the pandemic impacted millions of American households and businesses, some of its most severe impacts fell on low-income and underserved communities, where pre-existing disparities amplified the impact of the pandemic and where the most work remains to reach a full recovery. The final rule recognizes that the pandemic caused broad-based impacts that affected many communities, households, and small businesses across the country; for example, many worke rs faced unemployment and many small businesses saw declines in revenue . The final rule describes these as "impacted" households, communities, small businesses, and nonprofits. At the same time, the pandemic caused disproportionate impacts, or more severe impacts, in certain communities . For example, low-income and underserved communities have faced more severe health and economic outcomes like higher rates of COVID-19 mortality and unemployment, often because pre- existing disparities exacerbated the impact of the pandemic. The final rule describes these as "disproportionately impacted" households, communities, small businesses, and nonprofits. To simplify administration of the program, the final rule presumes that certain populations were "impacted" and "disproportionately impacted" by the pandemic; these populations are presumed to be eligible for services that respond to the impact they experienced. The final rule also enumerates a non- exhaustive list of eligible uses that are recognized as responsive to the impacts or disproportionate impacts of COVID-19. Recipients providing enumerated uses to populations presumed eligible are clearly operating consistently with the final rule. As discussed further in the section Framework for Eligible Uses Beyond Those Enumerated, recipients can also identify other pandemic impacts , impacted or disproportionately impacted populations or classes, and responses. However, note that the final rule maintains that general infrastructure projects, including roads, streets, and surface transportation infrastructure, would generally not be eligible under this eligible use category, unless the project responded to a specific pandemic public health need or a specific negative economic impact. Similarly, general economic development or workforce development-activities that do not respond to negative economic impacts of the pandemic but rather seek to more generally enhance the jurisdiction's business climate-would generally not be eligible under this eligible use category. Coronavirus State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: Overview of the Final Rule U.S. Department of the Treasury 16 e U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TR EASURY Assistance to Households Impacted Households and Communities Treasury presumes the following households and communities are impacted by the pandemic: ../ Low-or-moderate income households or communities ../ Households that experienced unemployment ../ Households that experienced increased food or housing insecurity ../ Households that qualify for the Children's Health Insurance Program, Childcare Subsidies through the Child Care Development Fund (CCDF) Program, or Medicaid ../ When providing affordable housing programs: households that qualify for the National Housing Trust Fund and Home Investment Partnerships Program ../ When providing services to address lost instructional time in K-12 schools: any student that lost access to in-person instruction for a significant period of time Low-or moderate-income households and communities are those with (i) income at or below 300 percent ofthe Federal Poverty Guidelines for the size of the household based on the most recently published poverty guidelines or (ii) income at or below 65 percent of the area median income for the county and size of household based on the most recently published data. For the vast majority of communities, the Federal Poverty Guidelines are higher than the area's median income and using the Federal Poverty Guidelines would result in more households and communities being presumed eligible . Treasury has provided an easy-to-use spreadsheet with Federal Poverty Guidelines and area median income levels on its website. Recipients can measure income for a specific household or the median income for the community, depending on whether the response they plan to provide serves specific households or the general community. The income thresholds vary by household size; recipients should generally use income thresholds for the appropriate household size but can use a default household size of three when easier for administration or when measuring income for a general community. The income limit for 300 percent of the Federal Poverty Guidelines for a household of three is $65,880 per year.3 In other words, recipients can always presume that a household earning below this level, or a community with median income below this level, is impacted by the pandemic and eligible for services to respond. Additionally, by following the steps detailed in the section Framework for Eligible Uses Beyond Those Enumerated, recipients may designate additional households as impacted or disproportionately impacted beyond these presumptions, and may also pursue projects not listed below in response to these impacts consistent with Treasury's standards. 3 For recipients in Alaska, the income limit for 300 percent of the Federal Poverty Guidelines for a household of three is $82,350 per year. For recipients in Hawaii, the income limit for 300 percent of the Federal Poverty Guidelines for a household of three is $75,780 per year. Coronavirus State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: Overview of the Final Rule U.S. Department of the Treasury 17 U.S. DE PARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Treasury recognizes the enumerated projects below, which have been expanded under the final rule, as eligible to respond to impacts of the pandemic on households and communities: ./ Food assistance (e.g., child nutrition ./ Burials, home repair & home weatherization programs, including school meals) & food ./ Programs, devices & equipment for internet banks access and digital literacy, including subsidies ./ Emergency housing assistance: rental for costs of access assistance, mortgage assistance, utility ./ Cash assistance assistance, assistance paying delinquent ./ Paid sick, medical, and family leave programs property taxes, counseling and legal aid to ./ Assistance in accessing and applying for prevent eviction and homelessness & public benefits or services emergency programs or services for homeless ./ Childcare and early learning services, home individuals, including temporary residences visiting programs, services for child welfare-for people experiencing homelessness ./ Health insurance coverage expansion involved families and foster youth & childcare facilities ./ Benefits for surviving family members of ./ Assistance to address the impact of learning individuals who have died from COVID-19 loss for K-12 students (e.g., high-quality ./ Assistance to individuals who want and are tutoring, differentiated instruction) available for work, including job training, ./ Programs or services to support long-term public jobs programs and fairs, support for housing security: including development of childcare and transportation to and from a affordable housing and permanent jobsite or interview, incentives for newly-supportive housing employed workers, subsidized employment, ./ Certain contributions to an Unemployment grants to hire underserved workers, assistance to unemployed individuals to start Insurance Trust Fund 4 small businesses & development of job and workforce training centers ./ Financial services for the unbanked and underbanked 4 Recipients may only use SLFRF funds for contributions to unemployment insurance trust funds and repayment of the principal amount due on advances received under Title XII of the Social Security Act up to an amount equal to (i) the difference between the balance in the recipient's unemp loyment insurance trust fund as of January 27 , 2020 and the balance of such account as of May 17, 2021, plus (ii) the principal amount outstanding as of May 17, 2021 on any advances received under Title XII of the Social Security Act between January 27 , 2020 and May 17, 2021 . Further, recipients may use SLFRF funds for the payment of any i nterest due on such Title XII advances . Additionally, a recipient that deposits SLFRF funds into its unemployment insurance trust fund to fu lly restore the pre-pandemic ba lance may not dr aw down that balance and deposit more SLFRF funds , back up to the pre-pandemic balance. Recipients that deposit SLFRF funds into an unemployment insurance trust fund , or use SLFRF funds to repay principal on Title XII advances, may not take action to reduce benefits available to unemployed workers by changing the computation method governing regu lar unemployment compensation in a way that results in a reduction of average weekly benefit amounts or the number of weeks of benefits payable (i.e ., ma ximum benefit entitlement). Coronavirus State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: Overview of the Final Rule U.S . Department of the Treasury 18 G u.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASUR Y Disproportionately Impacted Households and Communities Treasury presumes the following households and communities are disproportionately impacted by the pandemic: ./ Low -income households and communities ./ Households residing in Qualified Census Tracts ./ Households that qualify for certain federal benefits 5 ./ Households receiving services provided by Tribal governments ./ Households residing in the U.S. territories or receiving services from these governments Low-income households and communities are those with (i) income at or below 185 percent of the Federal Poverty Guidelines for the size of its household based on the most recently published poverty guidelines or (ii) income at or below 40 percent of area median income for its county and size of household based on the most recently published data. Fo r the vast majority of communities, the Federal Poverty Guidelines level is higher than the area median income level and using this level would result in more households and communities being presumed eligible . Treasury has provided an easy-to-use spreadsheet with Federal Poverty Guidelines and area median income levels on its website . Recipients can measure income for a specific household or the median income for the community, depending on whether the service they plan to provide serves specific households or the general community. The income thresholds vary by household size; recipients should generally use income thresholds for the appropriate household size but can use a default household size of three when easier for administration or when measuring income for a general community. The income limit for 185 percent of the Federal Poverty Guidelines for a household of three is $40,626 per year. 6 In other words, recipients can always presume that a household earning below this level, or a community with median income below this level, is disproportionately impacted by the pandemic and eligible for services to respond. 5 These programs are Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program {SNAP), Free-and Reduced-Price Lunch {NSLP) and/or School Breakfast (SBP) programs, Medicare Part 0 Low-Income Subsidies, Supplemental Security Income (SSI), Head Start and/or Early Head Start, Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC), Section 8 Vouchers, Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP), and Pel! Grants. For services to address educational disparities, Treasury will recognize Title I eligible schools as disproportionately impacted and responsive services that support the school generally or support the whole school as eli gible . 6 For recipients in Alaska, the income limit for 185 percent of the Federal Poverty Guidelines for a household of three is $50,783 per year . For recipients in Hawaii, the income limit for 185 percent of the Federal Poverty Guidelines for a household of three is $46,731 per year Coronavirus State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: Overview of the Final Rule U.S. Department of the Treasury 19 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Treasury recognizes the enumerated projects below, which have been expanded under the final rule, as eligible to respond to disproportionate impacts of the pandemic on households and communities: ./ Pay for community health workers to help households access health & social services ./ Remediation of lead paint or other lead hazards ./ Primary care clinics, hospitals, integration of health services into other settings, and other investments in medical equipment & facilities designed to address health disparities ./ Housing vouchers & assistance relocating to neighborhoods with higher economic opportunity ./ Investments in neighborhoods to promote improved health outcomes ./ Improvements to vacant and abandoned properties, including rehabilitation or maintenance, renovation, removal and remediation of environmental contaminants, demolition or deconstruction, greening/vacant lot cleanup & conversion to affordable housing7 ./ Services to address educational disparities, including assistance to high-poverty school districts & educational and evidence-based services to address student academic, social, emotional, and mental health needs ./ Schools and other educational equipment & facilities ./ Responses available to respond to impacts of the pandemic on households and communities (including those listed on page 18) 7 Please see the final rule for further details and conditions applicable to this eligible use. This includes Treasury's presumption that demolition of vacant or abandoned re sidential properties that re sults in a net reduction in occupiable housing units for low-and moderate-income individuals in an area wh ere the availability of such housing is lower than the need for such housing is ineligible for support with SLFRF funds . Corona virus State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: Overview of the Final Rule U.S . Department of the Treasury 20 U.S. DEPAR TME NT OF TH E TREASURY Assistance to Small Businesses Small businesses have faced widespread challenges due to the pandemic, including periods of shutdown, declines in revenue, or increased costs. The final rule provides many tools for recipients to respond to the impacts of the pandemic on small businesses, or disproportionate impacts on businesses where pre-existing disparities like lack of access to capital compounded the pandemic's effects. Small businesses eligible for assistance are those that experienced negative economic impacts or disproportionate impacts of the pandemic and meet the definition of us mall business," specifically: 1. Have no more than 500 employees, or if applicable, the size standard in number of employees established by the Administ rator of the Small Business Administration for the industry in which the business concern or organization operates, and 2. Are a small business concern as defined in section 3 of the Small Business Act 8 (which includes, among other requirements, that the business is independently owned and operated and is not dominant in its field of operation). Impacted Small Businesses Recipients can identify small businesses impacted by the pandemic, and measures to respond, in many ways; for example, recipients could consider: ../ Decreased revenue or gross receipts ../ Financial insecurity ..J Increased costs ../ Capacity to weather financial hardship ../ Challenges covering payroll, rent or mortgage, and other operating costs Assistance to small businesses that experienced negative economic impacts includes the following enumerated uses: ..J Loans or grants to mitigate financial hardship, such as by supporting payroll and benefits, costs to retain employees, and mortgage, rent, utility, and other operating costs Disproportionately Impacted Small Businesses ../ Technical assistance, counseling, or other services to support business planning Treasury presumes that the following small businesses are disproportionately impacted by the pandemic: 8 15 u.s.c. 632 . Coronavirus State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: Overview of the Final Rule U.S. Department of the Treasury 21 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY .j Small businesses ope rating in Qualified Census Tracts .J Small businesses operated by Tribal governments or on Tribal lands .j Small businesses operating in the U.S. te r ritories Assistance to disproportionately impacted small businesses includes the following enumerated uses, which have been ex panded under the final rule : .J Rehabilitation of commercial properties, storefront improvements & fa<;:ade improvements .j Support fo r microbusinesses, including financial, childcare , and transportation costs .J Technical assistance, business incubato rs & grants for start-up or expansion co st s for small businesses Coronavirus State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: Overview of the Final Rule U.S . Department of the Treasury 22 U.S . DEPARTMENT OF THE TRE ASUR Y Assistance to Nonprofits Nonprofits have faced significant challenges due to the pandemic's increased demand for services and changing operational needs, as well as declines in revenue sources such as donations and fees. Nonprofits eligible for assistance are those that experienced negative economic impacts or disproportionate impacts of the pandemic and meet the definition of "nonprofit" -specifically those that are 501(c)(3) or 501(c)(19) tax-exempt organizations. Impacted Nonprofits Recipients can identify nonprofits impacted by the pandemic, and measures to respond, in many ways; for example, recipients could consider: ../ Decreased revenue (e.g., from donations and fees) ../ Financial insecurity ../ Increased costs (e.g., uncompensated increases in service need) ../ Capacity to weather financial hardship ../ Challenges covering payroll, rent or mortgage, and other operating costs Assistance to non profits that experienced negative economic impacts includes the following enumerated uses: ../ Loans or grants to mitigate financial hardship Disproportionately Impacted Nonprofits ./ Technical or in-kind assistance or other services that mitigate negative economic impacts of the pandemic Treasury presumes that the following non profits are disproportionately impacted by the pandemic: ./ Nonprofits operating in Qualified Census Tracts ../ Nonprofits operated by Tribal governments or on Tribal lands ../ Nonprofits operating in the U.S. territories Recipients may identify appropriate responses that are related and reasonably proportional to addressing these disproportionate impacts . Coronavirus State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: Overview of the Final Rule U.S. Department of the Treasury 23 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Aid to Impacted Industries Recipients may use SLFRF funding to provide aid to industries impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Recipients should first designate an impacted industry and then provide aid to address the impacted industry's negative economic impact. This sub-category of eligible uses does not separately identify disproportionate impacts and corresponding responsive services. 1. Designating an impacted industry. There are two main ways an industry can be designated as "impacted." 1. If the industry is in the travel, tourism, or hospitality sectors (including Tribal development districts), the industry is impacted. 2. If the industry is outside the travel, tourism, or hospitality sectors, the industry is impacted if: a. The industry experienced at least 8 percent employment loss from pre-pandemic levels,9 or b. The industry is experiencing comparable or worse economic impacts as the national tourism, travel, and hospitality industries as of the date of the final rule, based on the totality of economic indicators or qualitative data (if quantitative data is unavailable), and if the impacts were generally due to the COVID-19 public health emergency. Recipients have flexibility to define industries broadly or narrowly, but Treasury encourages recipients to define narrow and discrete industries eligible for aid. State and territory recipients also have flexibility to define the industries with greater geographic precision; for example, a state may identify a particular industry in a certain region of a state as impacted. 2 . Providing eligible aid to the impacted industry. Aid may only be provided to support businesses, attractions, and Tribal development districts operating prior to the pandemic and affected by required closures and other efforts to contain the pandemic. Further, aid should be generally broadly available to all businesses within the impacted industry to avoid potential conflicts of interest, and Treasury encourages aid to be first used for operational expenses, such as payroll, before being used on other types of costs . 9 Specifically, a recipient should compare the percent change in the number of employees of the recipient's identified industry and the national Leisure & Hospitality sector in the three months before the pandemic's most severe impacts began {a straight three-month average of seasonally-adjusted employment data from December 2019, January 2020, and February 2020) with the latest data as of the final rule {a straight three-month average of seas onally-adjusted employment data from September 2021, October 2021, and November 2021). For parity and simplicity, smaller recipients without employment data that measure industries in their specific jurisdiction may use data available for a broader unit of government for thi s calculation {e.g ., a county may use data from the state in which it is located ; a city may us e data for the county, if available, or state in which it is located) solely for purposes of determining whether a particular industry is an impacted industry. Corona virus State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: Overview of the Final Rule U.S. Department of the Treasury 24 G u.s. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASUR Y Treasury recognizes the enumerated projects below as eligible responses to impacted industries . ../ Aid to mitigate financial ha rdship, such as supporting payroll costs, lost pay and benefits for returning employees, support of operations and maintenance of existing equipment and facilities ' ../ Technica l assistance , counseling, or other services to support business planning ../ COVID-19 mitigation and infection prevention measures (see section Public Health) As with all eligible uses, recipients may pursue a project not listed above by undergoing the steps outlined in the section Framework for Eligible Uses Beyond Those Enumerated. Coronavirus State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: Overview of the Final Rule U.S. Department of the Treasury 25 e U.S. DEPAR TME NT OF THE TREASURY PUBLIC SECTOR CAPACITY Recipients may use SLFRF funding to restore and bolster public sector capacity, which supports government's ability to deliver critical COVID-19 services. There are three main categories of eligible uses to bolster public sector capacity and workforce: Public Safety, Public Health, and Human Services Staff; Government Employment and Rehiring Public Sector Staff; and Effective Service Delivery. Public Safety, Public Health, and Human Services Staff SLFRF funding may be used for payroll and covered benefits for public safety, public health, health care, human services and similar employees of a recipient government, for the portion of the employee's time spent responding to COVID-19. Recipients should follow the steps below. 1. Identify eligible public safety, public health, and human services staff. Public safety staff include: ./ Police officers (including state police officers) ./ Sheriffs and deputy sheriffs ./ Firefighters ./ Emergency medical responders Public health staff include: ./ Employees involved in providing medical and other physical or mental health services to patients and supervisory personnel, including medical staff assigned to schools, prisons, and other such institutions ./ Laboratory technicians, medical examiners, morgue staff, and other support services essential for patient care Human services staff include: ./ Employees providing or administering social services and public benefits ./ Child welfare services employees ./ Correctional and detention officers ./ Dispatchers and supervisor personnel that directly support public safety staff ./ Employees of public health departments directly engaged in public health matters and related supervisory personnel ./ Child, elder, or family care employees 2. Assess portion of time spent on COVID-19 response for eligible staff. Recipients can use a variety of methods to assess the share of an employees' time spent responding to COVID-19, including using reasonable estimates-such as estimating the share of time based on discussions with staff and applying that share to all employees in that position. For administrative convenience, recipients can consider public health and safety employees entirely devoted to responding to COVID-19 (and their payroll and benefits fully covered by SLFRF) if the Coronavirus State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: Overview of the Final Rule U.S. Department of the Treasury 26 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY employee, or his or her operating unit or division, is "primarily dedicated" to responding to COVID- 19. Primarily dedicated means that more than half of the employee, unit, or division's time is dedicated to responding to COVID-19. Recipients must periodically reassess their determination and maint ain records to support their assessment, although recipients do not need to track staff hours. 3. Use SLFRF funding for payroll and covered benefits for the portion of eligible staff time spent on COVID-19 response. SLFRF funding may be used for payroll and covered benefits for the portion of the employees' time spent on COVID-19 response, as calculated above, through the period of performance . Government Employment and Rehiring Public Sector Staff Under the increased flexibility of the final rule, SLFRF funding may be used to support a broader set of uses to restore and support public sector employment. Eligible uses include hiring up to a pre-pandemic baseline that is adjusted for historic underinvestment in the public sector, providing additional funds for employees who experienced pay cuts or were furloughed, avoiding layoffs, providing worker retention incentives, and paying for ancillary administrative costs related to hiring, support, and retention . • Restor i ng pre-pandemic employment. Recipients have two options to restore pre-pandemic employment, depending on the recipient's needs. • If the recipient simply wants to hire back employees for pre-pandemic positions: Recipients may use SLFRF funds to hire employees for the same positions that existed on January 27, 2020 but that were unfilled or eliminated as of March 3, 2021. Recipients may use SLFRF funds to cover payroll and covered benefits for such positions through the period of performance. • If the recipient wants to hire above the pre-pandemic baseline and/or would like to have flexibility in positions: Recipients may use SLFRF funds to pay for payroll and covered benefits associated with the recipient increasing its number of budgeted FTEs up to 7.5 percent above its pre-pandemic baseline . Specifically, recipients should undergo the following steps: a. Identify the recipient's budgeted FTE level on January 27, 2020 . This includes all budgeted positions, filled and unfilled. This is called the pre-pandemic baseline. b. Multiply the pre-pandemic baseline by 1.075. This is called the adjusted pre- pandemic baseline . c. Identify the recipient's budgeted FTE level on March 3, 2021, which is the beginning of the period of performance for SLFRF funds. Recipients may, but are not required to, exclude the number of FTEs dedicated to responding to the COVID-19 public health emergency . This is called the actual number of FTEs. d. Subtract the actual number of FTEs from the adjusted pre-pandemic baseline to calculate the number of FTEs that can be covered by SLFRF funds . Recipients do not have to hire for the same roles that existed pre-pandemic. Coronavirus State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: Overview of the Final Rule U.S. Department of the Treasury 27 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREA SURY Recipients may use SLFRF funds to cover payroll and covered benefits through the period of performance; these employees must have begun their employment on or after March 3, 2021. Recipients may only use SLFRF funds for additional FTEs hired over the March 3, 2021 level (i.e., the actua l number of FTEs). • Supporting and retaining public sector workers. Recipients can also use funds in other ways that support the public sector workforce.10 These include : o Providing additional funding for employees who experienced pay reductions or were furloughed since the onset of the pandemic, up to the difference in the employee's pay, taking into account unemployment benefits received. o Maintaining current compensation levels to prevent layoffs. SLFRF funds may be used to maintain current compensation levels, with adjustments for inflation, in order to prevent layoffs that would otherwise be necessary. o Providing worker retention incentives, including reasonable increases in compensation to persuade employees to remain with the employer as compared to other employment options . Retention incentives must be entirely additive to an employee's regular compensation, narrowly tailored to need, and should not exceed incentives traditionally offered by the recipient or compensation that alternative employers may offer to compete for the employees . Treasury presumes that retention incentives that are less than 25 percent ofthe rate of base pay for an individual employee or 10 percent for a group or category of employees are reasonably proportional to the need to retain employees, as long as other requirements are met. • Covering administrative costs associated with administering the hiring, support, and retention programs above. Effective Service Delivery SLFRF funding may be used to improve the efficacy of public health and economic programs through tools like program evaluation, data, and outreach, as well as to address administrative needs caused or exacerbated by the pandemic. Eligible uses include : • Supporting program evaluation, data, and outreach through: 10 Recipients should be able to substantiate that these uses of funds are substantially due to the public health emergency or its negative economic impacts (e .g., fisca l pre ssure s on state and local budgets) and respond to its impacts . See the final rule for details on these uses. Coronavirus State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: Overview of the Final Rule U.S. Department of the Treasury 28 U.S . DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASUR Y ../ Program evaluation and evidence resou rces ../ Data analysis resources to gather, assess , share , and use data ./ Technology infrastructure to improve access to and the user experience of government IT systems, as well as technology improvements to increase public access and delivery of government programs and services • Addressing administrative needs, including: ../ Administrative costs for programs responding to the public health emergency and its economic impacts , including non-SLFRF and non-federally funded p rograms ../ Community outreach and engagement activities ../ Capacity building resources to support using data and evidence, including hiring staff, consultants, or technical assista nee support ../ Address administrative needs caused or exacerbated by the pandemic, including addressing bac klogs caused by shutdowns, increased repai r or maintenance needs, and technology infrastructure to adapt government operations to the pandemic (e.g ., video-conferencing software, data and case management systems) Coronavirus State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: Overview of the Final Rule U.S. Department of the Treasury 29 0 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREA SURY CAPITAL EXPENDITURES As described above, the final rule clarifies that recipients may use funds for programs, services, and capital expenditures that respond to the public health and negative economic impacts of the pandemic. Any use of funds in this category for a capital expenditure must comply with the capital expenditure requirements, in addition to other standards for uses of funds. Capital expenditures are subject to the same eligibility standard as other eligible uses to respond to the pandemic's public health and economic impacts; specifically, they must be related and reasonably proportional to the pandemic impact identified and reasonably designed to benefit the impacted population or class . For ease of administration, the final rule identifies enumerated types of capital expenditures that Treasury has identified as responding to the pandemic's impacts; these are listed in the applicable sub- category of eligible uses (e .g., public health, assistance to households, etc.). Recipients may also identify other responsive capital expenditures. Similar to other eligible uses in the SLFRF program, no pre- approval is required for capital expenditures. To guide recipients' analysis of whether a capital expenditure meets the eligibility standard, recipients (with the exception of Tribal governments) must complete and meet the requirements of a written justification for capital expenditures equal to or greater than $1 million. For large-scale capital expenditures, which have high costs and may require an extended length of time to complete, as well as most capital expenditures for non-enumerated uses of funds, Treasury requires recipients to submit their written justification as part of regular reporting. Specifically: If a project has and the use is enumerated by Treasury and the use is beyond those total capital as eligible, then enumerated by Treasury as eligible, expenditures then of Less than $1 No Written Justification required No Written Justification required million Greater than or equal to $1 Written Justification required but million, but recipients are not required to submit as less than $10 part of regular reporting to Treasury Written Justification required and million recipient s must submit as part of regular Written Justification required and reporting to Treasury $10 million or recipients must submit as part of regular more reporting to Treasury A Written Justification includes : • Description of the harm or need to be addressed. Recipients should provide a description of the specific harm or need to be addressed and why the harm was exacerbated or caused by the public health emergency. Recipients may provide quantitative information on the extent and the type of harm, such as the number of individuals or entities affected . Coronavirus State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds. Overview of the Final Rule U.S. Department of the Treasury 30 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TH E TREASURY • Explanation of why a capital expenditure is appropriate. For example, recipients should include an explanation of why existing equipment and facilities, or policy changes or additional funding to pertinent programs or services, would be inadequate. • Comparison of proposed capital project against at least two alternative capital expenditures and demonstration of why the proposed capital expenditure is superior. Recipients should consider the effectiveness of the capital expenditure in addressing the harm identified and the expected total cost (including pre-development costs) against at least two alternative capital expenditures. Where relevant, recipients should consider the alternatives of improving existing capital assets already owned or leasing other capital assets. Treasury presumes that the following capital projects are generally ineligible: x Construction of new correctional facilities as a response to an increase in rate of crime x Construction of new congregate facilities to decrease spread of COVID-19 in the facility x Construction of convention centers, stadiums, or other large capital projects intended for general economic development or to aid impacted industries In undertaking capital expenditures, Treasury encourages recipients to adhere to strong labor standards, including project labor agreements and community benefits agreements that offer wages at or above the prevailing rate and include local hire provisions . Treasury also encourages recipients to prioritize in their procurements employers with high labor standards and to prioritize employers without recent violations of federal and state labor and employment laws. Coronavirus State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: Overview of the Final Rule U.S. Department of the Treasury 31 e U.S. DEPARTMENTOFTHET REAS URY FRAMEWORK FOR EliGIBLE USES BEYOND THOSE ENUMERATED As described above, recipients have broad flexibility to identify and respond to other pandemic impacts and serve other populations that experienced pandemic impacts, beyond the enumerated uses and presumed eligible populations. Recipients should undergo the following steps to decide whether their project is eligible : Step 1. Identify COVID-19 public health or 2. Design a response that addresses or economic impact responds to the impact Analysis • Can identify impact to a specific • Types of responses can include a household, business or nonprofit or to program, service, or capital a class of households, businesses or expenditure nonprofits (i.e., group) • Response should be related and • Can also identify disproportionate reasonab ly proportional to the harm impacts, or more severe impacts, to a • Response should also be reasonably specific beneficiary or to a class designed to benefit impacted individual or class 1. Identify a COVID -19 public health or negative economic impact on an individual or a class. Recipients should identify an individual or class that is "impacted" or "d isproportionately impacted" by the COVID-19 public health emergency or its negative economic impacts as well as the specific impact itself. • "Impacted" entities are those impacted by the disease itself or the harmful consequences of the economic disruptions resulting from or exacerbated by the COVID- 19 public health emergency. For example, an individual who lost their job or a small business that saw lower revenue during a period of closure would both have experienced impacts of the pandemic. • "Disproportionately impacted" entities are those that experienced disproportionate public health or economic outcomes from the pandemic; Treasury recognizes that pre- existing disparities, in many cases, amplified the impacts of the pandemic, causing more severe impacts in underserved communities. For example, a household living in a neighborhood with limited access to medical care and healthy foods may have faced health disparities before the pandemic, like a higher rate of chronic health conditions, that contributed to more severe health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. The recipient may choose to identify these impacts at either the individual level or at a class level. If the recipient is identifying impacts at the individual level, they should retain documentation supporting the impact the ind ividual experienced (e.g., documentation of lost r evenues from a small business). Such documentation can be streamlined in many cases (e .g., self-attestation that a household requires food assistance). Recipients also have broad flexibility to identify a "class"-or a group of households, small businesses, or non profits-that experienced an impact. In these cases, the recipients should Coronavirus State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: Overview of the Final Rule U.S . Department of the Treasury 32 U.S . DEP A RTMENT OF THE TREASURY first identify the class and the impact that it faced. Then, recipients only need to document that the individuals served fall within that class; recipients do not need to document a specific impact to each individual served. For example, a recipient could identify that restaurants in the downtown area faced substantial declines in revenue due to decreased foot traffic from workers; the recipient could develop a program to respond to the impact on that class and only needs to document that the businesses being served are r estaurants in the downtown area. Recipients should keep the following considerations in mind when designating a class: • There should be a relationship between the definition of the class and the proposed response. Larger and less-specific classes are less likely to have experienced similar harms, which may make it more difficult to design a response that appropriately responds to those harms . • Classes may be determined on a population basis or on a geographic basis, and the response should be appropriately matched . For example, a response might be designed to provide childcare to single parents, regardless of which neighborhood they live in, or a response might provide a park to improve the health of a disproportionately impacted neighborhood. • Recipients may designate classes that experienced disproportionate impact, by assessing the impacts of the pandemic and finding that some populations experienced meaningfully more severe impacts than the general public. To determine these disproportionate impacts, recipients: o May designate classes based on academic research or government research publications (such as the citations provided in the supplementary information in the final rule), through analysis of their own data, or through analysis of other existing data sources . o May also consider qualitative research and sources to augment their analysis, or when quantitative data is not readily available. Such sources might include resident interviews or feedback from relevant state and local agencies, such as public health departments or social services departments. o Should consider the quality of the research, data, and applicability of analysis to their determination in all cases. • Some of the enumerated uses may also be appropriate responses to the impacts experienced by other classes of beneficiaries. It is permissible for recipients to provide these services to other classes, so long as the recipient determines that the response is also appropriate for those groups . • Recipients may designate a class based on income level, including at levels higher than the final rule definition of "low-and moderate-income." For example, a recipient may identify that households in their community with incomes above the final rule threshold for low-income nevertheless experienced disproportionate impacts from the pandemic and provide responsive services. 2. Design a response that addresses or responds to t he impact. Programs, services, and other interventions must be reasonably designed to benefit the individual or class that experienced Coronavirus State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: Overview of the Final Rule U.S . Department of the Treasury 33 U.S . DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY the impact. They must also be related and reasonably proportional to the extent and type of impact experienced . For example, uses that bear no relation or are grossly disproportionate to the type or extent of the impact would not be eligible. "Reasonably proportional" refers to the scale of the response compared to the scale of the harm, as well as the targeting of the response to beneficiaries compared to the amount of harm they experienced; for example, it may not be reasonably proportional for a cash assistance program to provide a very small amount of aid to a group that experienced severe harm and a much larger amount to a group that experienced relatively little harm. Recipients should consider relevant factors about the harm identified and the response to evaluate whether the response is reasonably proportional. For example, recipients may consider the size of the population impacted and the severity, type, and duration of the impact. Recipients may also consider the efficacy, cost, cost-effectiveness, and time to delivery of the response. For disproportionately impacted communities, recipients may design interventions that address broader pre-existing disparities that contributed to more severe health and economic outcomes during the pandemic, such as disproportionate gaps in access to health care or pre-existing disparities in educational outcomes that have been exacerbated by the pandemic. Corona virus State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: Overview of the Final Rule U.S. Department of the Treasury 34 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TR EASURY Premium Pay The Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds may be used to provide premium pay to eligible workers performing essential work during the pandemic. Premium pay may be awarded to eligible workers up to $13 per hour. Premium pay must be in addition to wages or remuneration (i.e., compensation) the eligib le worker otherwise receives. Premium pay may not exceed $25,000 for any single worker during the program. Recipients should undergo the following steps to provide premium pay to eligible workers . 1. Identify an "eligible" worker. Eligible workers include workers "needed to maintain continuity of operations of essential critical infrastructure sectors ." These sectors and occupations are eligible : ./ ' ./ ./ ./ ./ ./ ./ .,/ .,/ .,/ .,/ .,/ .,/ ./ .,/ Health care ./ State, local, or Tribal government Emergency response workforce Sanitation, disinfection & cleaning ./ Workers providing v ital services to Maintenance Tribes Grocery stores, restaurants, food ./ Educational, school nutrition, and other production, and food delivery work required to operate a school Pharmacy facility Biomedical research .,/ Laundry Behavioral hea lth .,/ Elections Medical testing and diagnostics .,/ Solid waste or hazardous materials Home and community-based health care management, response, and cleanup or assistance with activities of daily living .,/ Work requiring physical interaction with Family or child care patients Social services .,/ Dental care Public health .,/ Transportation and warehousing Mortuary .,/ Hotel and commercial lodging facilities Critical clinical research, development, that are used for COVID-19 mitigation and testing necessary for COVID-19 and containment response Beyond this list, the chief executive (or equivalent) of a recipient government may designate additional non-public sectors as critical so long as doing so is necessary to protecting the health and wellbeing of the residents of such jurisdictions. 2. Verify that the eligible worker performs "essential work," meaning work that: • Is not performed while teleworking from a residence; and • Involves either: a. regular, in-person interactions with patients, the public, or coworkers of the individual that is performing the work; or b. regular physical handling of items that were handled by, or are to be handled by, patients, the public, or coworkers of the individual that is performing the work. Coronavirus State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: Overview of the Final Rule U.S . Department of the Treasury 35 U.S . DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 3. Confirm that the premium pay "responds to" workers performing essential work during the COVID-19 public health emergency. Under the final rule, which broadened the share of eligible workers who can receive premium pay without a written justification, recipients may meet this requirement in one of three ways: • Eligible worker receiving premium pay is earning (with the premium included) at or below 150 percent of their residing state or county's average annual wage for all occupations, as defined by the Bureau of Labor Statistics' Occupational Employment and Wage Statisti cs , whichever is higher, on an annual basis; or • Eligible worker receiving premium pay is not exempt from the Fair Labor Standards Act overtime provisions; or • If a worker does not meet either of the above requirements, the recipient must submit written justification to Treasury detailing how the premium pay is otherwise responsive to workers performing essential work during the public health emergency. This may include a description of the essential worker's duties, health, or financial risks faced due to COVID-19, and why the recipient determined that the premium pay was responsive. Treasury anticipates that recipients will easily be able to satisfy the justification requirement for front-line workers, like nurses and hospital staff. Premium pay may be awarded in installments or lump sums (e.g., monthly, quarterly, etc.) and may be awarded to hourly, part-time, or salaried or non-hourly workers. Premium pay must be paid in addition to wages already received and may be paid retrospectively . A recipient may not use SLFRF to merely reimburse itself for premium pay or hazard pay already received by the worker, and premium pay may not be paid to volunteers . Coronavirus State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: Overview of the Final Rule U.S. Department of the Treasury 36 e U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Water & Sewer Infrastructure The Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds may be used to make necessary investments in water and sewer infrastructure. State, local, and Tribal governments have a tremendous need to address the consequences of deferred maintenance in drinking water systems and removal, management, and treatment of sewage and stormwater, along with additional resiliency measures needed to adapt to climate change. Recipients may undertake the eligible projects below: PROJECTS ELIGIBLE UNDER EPA'S CLEAN WATER STATE REVOLVING FUND (CWSRF) Eligible projects under the CWSRF, and the final rule, include: ./ Construction of publicly owned ./ Development and implementation of a treatment works conservation and management plan ./ Projects pursuant to implementation under the CWA of a non point source pollution ./ Watershed projects meeting the management program established criteria set forth in the CWA under the Clean Water Act (CWA) ./ Energy consumption reduction for ./ Decentralized wastewater treatment publicly owned treatment works systems that treat municipal ./ Reuse or recycling of wastewater, wastewater or domestic sewage stormwater, or subsurface drainage ./ Management and treatment of water stormwater or subsurface drainage ./ Security of publicly owned treatment water works ./ Water conservation, efficiency, or reuse measures Treasury encourages recipients to review the EPA handbook for the CWSRF for a full list of eligibilities. PROJECTS ELIGIBLE UNDER EPA'S DRINKING WATER STATE REVOLVING FUND (DWSRF) Eligible drinking water projects under the DWSRF, and the final rule, include: ./ Facilities to improve drinking water quality ./ Transmission and distribution, including improvements of water pressure or prevention of contamination in infrastructure and lead service line replacements -/ New sources to replace contaminated drinking water or increase drought resilience, including aquifer storage and recovery system for water storage ./ Green infrastructure, including green roofs, rainwater harvesting collection, permeable pavement ./ Storage of drinking water, such as to prevent contaminants or equalize water demands ./ Purchase of water systems and interconnection of systems ./ New community water systems Treasury encourages recipients to review the EPA handbook for the DWSRF for a full list of eligibilities . Coronavirus State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: Overview of the Final Rule U.S. Department of the Treasury 37 e U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TRE AS UR Y ADDITIONAL ELIGIBLE PROJECTS With broadened eligibility under the final rule, SLFRF funds may be used to fund additional types of projects-such as additional stormwater infrastructure, residential wells, lead remediation, and certain rehabilitations of dams and reservoirs -beyond the CWSRF and DWSRF, if they are found to be "necessary" according to the definition provided in the final rule and outlined below. / Culvert repair, resizing, and removal, replacement of storm sewers, and additional types of stormwater infrastructure / Infrastructure to improve access to safe drinking water for individual served by residential wells, including testing initiatives, and treatment/remediation strategies that address contamination / Dam and reservoir rehabilitation if primary purpose of dam or reservoir is for drinking water supply and project is necessary for provision of drinking water A "necessary" investment in infrastructure must be: / Broad set of lead remediation projects eligible under EPA grant programs authorized by the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation (WIIN) Act, such as lead testing, installation of corrosion control treatment, lead service line replacement, as well as water quality testing, compliance monitoring, and remediation activities, including replacement of internal plumbing and faucets and fixtures in schools and childcare facilities (1) responsive to an identified need to achieve or maintain an adequate minimum level of service, which may include a reasonable projection of increased need, whether due to population growth or otherwise, (2) a cost-effective means for meeting that need, taking into account available alternatives, and (3) for investments in infrastructure that supply drinking water in order to meet projected population growth, projected to be sustainable over its estimated useful life. Please note that DWSRF and CWSRF-eligible projects are generally presumed to be necessary investments. Additional eligible projects generally must be responsive to an identified need to achieve or maintain an adequate minimum level of service . Recipients are only required to assess cost- effectiveness of projects for the creation of new drinking water systems, dam and reservoir rehabilitation projects, or projects for the extension of drinking water service to meet population growth needs. Recipients should review the supplementary information to the final rule for more details on requirements applicable to each type of investment. APPLICABLE STANDARDS & REQUIREMENTS Treasury encourages recipients to adhere to strong labor standards, including project labor agreements and community benefits agreements that offer wages at or above the prevailing rate and include local hire provisions. Treasury also encourages recipients to prioritize in their procurements employers with high labor standards and to prioritize employers without recent violations of federal and state labor and employment laws. Coronavirus State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: Overview of the Final Rule U.S. Department of the Treasury 38 G u.s. DEPARTMENT Of THETREASU RY Broadband Infrastructure The Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds may be used to make necessary investments in broadband infrastructure, which has been shown to be critical for work, education, healthcare, and civic participation during the public health emergency. The final rule broadens the set of eligible broadband infrastructure investments that recipients may undertake. Recipients may pursue investments in broadband infrastructure meeting technical standards detailed below, as well as an expanded set of cybersecurity investments . BROADBAND INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENTS Recipients should adhere to the following requirements when designing a broadband infrastructure project: 1. Identify an eligible area for investment. Recipients are encouraged to prioritize projects that are designed to serve locations without access to reliable wireline 100/20 Mbps broadband service (meaning service that reliably provides 100 Mbps download speed and 20 Mbps upload speed through a wireline connection), but are broadly able to invest in projects designed to provide service to locations with an identified need for additional broadband investment. Recipients have broad flexibility to define need in their community. Examples of need could include: ./ Lack of access to a reliable high-speed broadband connection ./ Lack of affordable broadband ./ Lack of reliable service If recipients are considering deploying broadband to locations where there are existing and enforceable federal or state funding commitments for reliable service of at least 100/20 Mbps, recipients must ensure that SLFRF funds are designed to address an identified need for additional broadband investment that is not met by existing federal or state funding commitments. Recipients must also ensure that SLFRF funds will not be used for costs that will be reimbursed by the other federal or state funding streams. 2. Design project to meet high-speed technical standards. Recipients are required to design projects to, upon completion, reliably meet or exceed symmetrical100 Mbps download and upload speeds. In cases where it is not practicable, because of the excessive cost of the project or geography or topography of the area to be served by the project, eligible projects may be designed to reliably meet or exceed 100/20 Mbps and be scalable to a minimum of symmetrical 100 Mbps download and upload speeds. Treasury encourages recipients to prioritize investments in fiber-optic infrastructure wherever feasible and to focus on projects that will achieve last-mile connections . Further, Treasury encourages recipients to prioritize support for broadband networks owned, operated by, or affiliated with local governments, nonprofits, and co-operatives. Coronavirus State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: Overview of the Final Rule U.S. Department of the Treasury 39 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASUR Y 3. Requi re enrollment in a low-income subsidy program . Recipients must requ i re the service provide r for a broadband project that provides service to households to either: -/ Participate in the FCC's Affordable Connectivity Program (ACP) ../ Provide access to a broad-based affordability program to low-income consumers that provides benefits commensurate to ACP Treasury encourages broadband services to also include at least one low-cost option offered without data usage caps at speeds sufficient for a household with multiple users to simultaneously telework and engage in remote learning . Recipients are also encouraged to consult with the community on affordability needs . CYBERSECURI T Y INVESTMENTS SLFRF may be used for modernization of cybersecurity for existing and new broadband infrastructure, r egardless of thei r speed delivery standards . This includes modernization of hardware and software. APPLIC ABLE STANDARDS & REQUIREMENTS Treasury encourages recipients to adhere to strong labor standards, including project labor agreements and community benefits agreements that offer wages at or above the prevailing rate and include local hire provisions . Treasury also encourages recipients to prioritize in their procurements employers w ith high labor standards and to prioritize employers without recent violations of federal and state labor and employment laws. Coronavirus State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: Overview of the Final Rule U.S. Department of the Treasury 40 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASUR Y Restrictions on Use While recipients have considerable flexibility to use Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds to address the diverse needs of their communities, some restrictions on use of funds apply. OFFSET A REDUCTION IN NET TAX REVENUE • States and territories may not use this funding to directly or indirectly offset a reduction in net tax revenue resulting from a change in law, regulation, or administrative interpretation beginning on March 3, 2021, through the last day of the fiscal year in which the funds provided have been spent. If a state or territory cuts taxes during this period, it must demonstrate how it paid for the tax cuts from sources other than SLFRF, such as by enacting policies to raise other sources of revenue, by cutting spending, or through higher revenue due to economic growth. If the funds provided have been used to offset tax cuts, the amount used for this purpose must be repaid to the Treasury . DEPOSITS INTO PENSION FUNDS • No recipients except Tribal governments may use this funding to make a deposit to a pension fund. Treasury defines a "deposit" as an extraordinary contribution to a pension fund for the purpose of reducing an accrued, unfunded liability. While pension deposits are prohibited, recipients may use funds for routine payroll contributions connected to an eligible use of funds (e.g., for public health and safety staff). Examples of extraordinary payments include ones that: x Reduce a liability incurred prior to the start of the COVID-19 public health emergency and occur outside the recipient's regular timing for making the payment ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS x Occur at the regular time for pension contributions but is larger than a regular payment would have been Additional restrictions and requirements that apply across all eligible use categories include: • No debt service or replenishing financial reserves. Since SLFRF funds are intended to be used prospectively, recipients may not use SLFRF funds for debt service or replenishing financial reserves (e.g., rainy day funds). • No satisfaction of settlements and judgments. Satisfaction of any ob l igation arising under or pursuant to a settlement agreement, judgment, consent decree, or judicially confirmed debt restructuring in a judicial, administrative, or regulatory proceeding is itself not an eligible use . However, if a settlement requires the recipient to provide services or incur other costs that are an eligible use of SLFRF funds, SLFRF may be used for those costs . • Additional general restrictions. SLFRF funds may not be used for a project that conflicts with or contravenes the purpose of the American Rescue Plan Act statute (e.g., uses of funds that Coronavirus State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: Overview of the Final Rule U.S. Department af the Treasury 41 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY undermine COVID-19 mitigation practices in line with CDC guidance and recommendations) and may not be used in violation of the Award Terms and Conditions or conflict of interest requirements under the Uniform Guidance. Other applicable laws and regulations, outside of SLFRF program requirements, may also apply (e.g., laws around procurement, contracting, conflicts-of-interest, environmental standards, or civil rights). Coronavirus State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: Overview of the Final Rule U.S. Department of the Treasury 42 U.S. DEP A RTMENT OF THE TRE AS URY Program Ad m inistration The Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds final rule details a number of administrative processes and requirements, including on distribution of funds, time line for use of funds, transfer of funds, treatment of loans, use of funds to meet non-federal match or cost-share requirements, administrative expenses, reporting on use of funds, and remediation and recoupment .of funds used for ineligible pu r poses. This section provides a summary for the most frequently asked que:stions . TIMELINE FOR USE OF FUNDS Under the SLFRF, funds must be used for costs incurred on or after March 3, 2021. Further, costs must be obligated by December 31, 2024, and expended by December 31, 2026. TRANSFERS Recipients may undertake projects on their own or through subrecipients, which carry out eligible uses on behalf of a recipient, including pooling funds with other recipients or blending and braiding SLFRF funds with other sources of funds. Localities may also transfer their funds to the state through section 603(c)(4L which will decrease the locality's award and increase the state award amounts. LOA N S Recipients may generally use SLFRF funds to provide loans for uses that are otherwise eligible, although there are special rules about how recipients should t rack program income depending on the length of the loan. Recipients should consult the final rule if they seek to utilize these provisions . NON-FEDERAL MATCH OR COST-SHARE REQUIREME NTS Funds available under the "revenue loss " eligible use category (sections 602(c)(1)(C) and 603(c)(1)(C) of the Social Security Act) generally may be used to meet the non-federal cost-share or matching requ i rements of other federal programs . However, note that SLFRF funds may not be used as the non- federal share for purposes of a state's Medicaid and CHIP programs because the Office of Management and Budget has approved a waiver as requested by the Cente rs for Medicare & Medicaid Services pursuant to 2 CFR 200.102 of the Uniform Guidance and related regulations . SLFRF funds beyond those that are available under the revenue loss eligible use category may not be used to meet the non-federal match or cost-share requirements of other federal programs, other than as specifically provided for by statute. As an example, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act provides that SLFRF funds may be used to meet the non-fede ral match requirements of authorized Bureau of Reclamation projects and certain broadband deployment projects . Recipients should consult the fina l rule for further details if they seek to utilize SLFRF funds as a match for these projects . ADMINISTR ATI V E EX PENSES SLFRF funds may be used for direct and indirect administrative expenses involved in administering the program . For details on permissible direct and indirect administrative costs, recipients should refer to Treasury's Compliance and Reporting Guidance . Costs incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances must be treated consistently as either direct or indirect costs . Coronavirus State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: Overview of the Final Rule U.S. Department of the Treasury 43 e U.S. DEPAR TM ENT Of THE TREASUR Y REPORTING, COMPLIANCE & RECOUPMENT Recipients are required to comply with Treasury's Compliance and Reporting Guidance , which includes submitting mandatory periodic reports to Treasury. Funds used in violation of the final rule are subject to remediation and recoupment. As outlined in the final rule, Treasury may identify funds used in violation through reporting or other sources. Recipients will be provided with an initial written notice of recoupment with an opportunity to submit a request for reconsideration before Treasury provides a final notice of recoupment. lfthe recipient receives an initial notice of recoupment and does not submit a request for reconsideration, the initial notice will be deemed the final notice. Treasury may pursue other forms of remediation and monitoring in conjunction with, or as an alternative to, recoupment. REVISIONS TO THE OVERVIEW OF THE FINAL RULE: • January 18, 2022 (p. 4, p. 16): Clarification that the revenue loss standard allowance is {{up to" $10 million under the Replacing Lost Public Sector Revenue eligible use category; addition of further information on the eligibility of general infrastructure, general economic development, and worker development projects under the Public Health and Negative Economic Impacts eligible use category. • March 17, 2022 (p. 18): Specified that provision of child nutrition programs is available to respond to impacts of the pandemic on households and communities . Coronavirus State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds: Overview of the Final Rule U.S. Department of the Treasury 44 Funds Remaining in Previous Sales Taxes Category Availible Funds Upcoming projects Sales Tax F Local Roads $48,938.27 JC Loop Signing and Striping Sales Tax G Local Roads Sidewalks *Stormwater **Joint projects $67,711.28 $348,285.15 $23,469.16 $1,818,245.07 JC Loop Signing and Striping / unassigned Adams Street, Veith Drive and Stadium Various projects such as Isom, Major, Jackson, Chestnut, Ellis, Woodridge and others. MSP Redevelopment * There is $540, 917 in Covid/ARPA funding for stormwater. ** This is the City's contribution to the project, the County contributed $1,553,908.23 There is also a $1,500,000 EDA grant CITY OF JEFFERSON HALF CENT SALES TAX H PROJECTED CASH FLOW GL Acct # Department/Description FY2022 (1/2 yr) FY2023 FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 (1/2 yr) Total Public Works & Planning (Budget $16,520,000) 46-990-577020 City/County Cooperative Projects $ 550,000 $ 1,100,000 $ 1,100,000 $ 1,100,000 $ 1,100,000 $ 550,000 $ 5,500,000 $ 6,900,000 46-990-577031 Overlay Program $ 690,000 $ 1,380,000 $ 1,380,000 $ 1,380,000 $ 1,380,000 $ 690,000 46-990-590070 Transit - Matching Funds $ 45,000 $ 90,000 $ 90,000 $ 90,000 $ 90,000 $ 45,000 $ 450,000 46-990-590075 Airport - Matching Funds $ 45,000 $ 90,000 $ 90,000 $ 90,000 $ 90,000 $ 45,000 $ 450,000 46-990-577106 Miscellaneous Neighborhood Sidewalks $ 60,000 $ 120,000 $ 120,000 $ 120,000 $ 120,000 $ 60,000 $ 600,000 46-990-576007 Stormwater $ 232,000 $ 464,000 $ 464,000 $ 464,000 $ 464,000 $ 232,000 $ 2,320,000 46-990-577062 Local Roadway Studies/Grant Matching $ 30,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ 30,000 $ 300,000 Total $ 1,652,000 $ 3,304,000 $ 3,304,000 $ 3,304,000 $ 3,304,000 $ 1,652,000 $ 16,520,000 West (City side 15.00' 10.00'- 80.00' right of way 28.00' 2.00%, Underground utility area Chestnut Street Typical Section Utility poles 16 .50' Bioswale a) 0 .( a) 0 5 .00' cn o w BARTLETT WEST SERVICE. THE BARTLETT S. WEST WAY. February 24, 2010 Mr. Matt Morasch, P.E. Deputy Director for Public Works City of Jefferson 320 E. McCarty Street Jefferson City, MO 65101 Re: BEAP Project 09LTAP-34 Bridge No. 2180003 High Street Viaduct in the City of Jefferson, MO Dear Mr. Morasch: We had opportunities to visit and view the bridge noted above and shown in the figures herein. The High Street viaduct is located in the City of Jefferson approximately 0.5 mile south of the Missouri River bridges. This structure has been open to traffic since 1950 when it (Bridge No. L-148) was constructed as part of a project administered by the Missouri State Highway Department on the behalf of the City and funded by city, state and federal governments. Figure 1: The High Street viaduct constructed in 1949 and 1950 (at a cost of $783k) replaced the Thomas viaduct built in 1913 (at a cost of $26k) to become what some reports called the City's new landmark. The observations summarized in this Bridge Engineering Assistance Program (BEAP) report support the conclusion that the bridge should be rehabilitated rather than widened or replaced. However, it is also recommended that the City begin the long-range planning and budgeting process to replace the bridge by including the project in the 2030 Metropolitan Plan for the Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO). Specific repair strategies are described in greater detail on pages 10 and 11 of this report and are similar in many ways to the repairs made in 1985 by contract (i.e., not by the City's forces) as a City project. In summary, we recommend that the following bridge components be repaired: Superstructure: Repair as needed the concrete overlay near the expansion joints, the curbs on each side of the bridge and the bearing areas of the cast -in -place concrete tee beams. Treat and protect concrete surfaces by applying a penetrating sealer to the concrete deck and an epoxy sealer to the curbs. It is not recommended that span 11-12 on the west end of the bridge be realigned to its original position as was recommended, but not done, during the 1985 rehabilitation work. Expansion joints: Replace all 17 expansion joints at the intermediate and end bents. This work must be done if repair work to the substructure units is to have any lasting value. Substructure: Repair the deteriorating portions of 12 substructure units with many of the intermediate bents on the bridge's east end needing the greatest amount of repair. Treat and protect the concrete surfaces closest to the joints by applying an epoxy coating to the plan -defined areas generally described here as the entire beam cap and a portion of the columns. The full engineering and drafting services needed to provide contract -ready documents for these repairs are beyond the scope of this BEAP study. Any major rehabilitation work done to the bridge makes the structure ineligible for federal funding for 10 years even if it is funded locally; the repairs listed above do not constitute a major rehabilitation. Until the time that the bridge is repaired or replaced by contract, it is recommended that the City: a.) monitor the concrete deck, curb and substructure units for increased cracking, spalls and delaminations, b.) repair the existing deck overlay with concrete or approved accelerated mortars when necessary, c.) consider protecting the deck with a penetrating sealer such as Pavon® Indeck or Star Macro Deck to be applied every 3 to 5 years, d.) periodically clean and maintain the expansion joints, and e.) continue to remove drift that may accumulate at the intermediate bents. Existing Bridge Information The High Street viaduct has a posted speed limit of 30 m.p.h. (20 m.p.h. in front of St. Peter's School), does not have a posted weight limit and crosses Missouri Boulevard, Wears Creek and a spur line of the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR). High Street, classified as an "Urban Minor Arterial", currently carries approximately 5685 vehicles per day and is projected to have an Average Daily Traffic (ADT) count of 9380 in 2027 according to the National Bridge Inventory (NBI) Structure Inventory and Appraisal (SI&A) Sheet. The two-lane roadway approaches lead to an 867'± long bridge having a 26'-0" wide roadway and carrying two lanes for two-way vehicular traffic. Both the west and east approaches have wider roadways (curb to curb) than the bridge, but the additional widths are utilized for parallel parking. The bridge's substructure units consist of parallel retaining walls and a hollow abutment at the east end, a vertical wall abutment at the west end, and 11 intermediate bents that are founded on pile footings. The superstructure consists of 6 lines of cast -in -place concrete tee beams with 5'-0" wide sidewalks, 181/2" tall concrete curbs and 3'-0"± tall galvanized steel handrails on each side. Each of the 12 tee beam spans are simple spans with the first 10 being square (no skew) and the two western -most spans varying in skew to accommodate the two sets of railroad tracks underneath. The bridge is inspected every two years; a general inspection was last done in January 2010 and an underwater inspection was completed in July 2008. The NBI SI&A condition ratings for the deck, superstructure and substructure are 6, 6 and 6, respectively, on a scale of 0 (failed condition) to 9 (excellent condition) with a rating of 4 or less for any one of the condition ratings making the bridge "structurally deficient". The condition ratings of 6 (satisfactory condition) are consistent with if not better than other typical bridges of this vintage and can be attributed to some degree to the lower traffic speeds and relatively little truck traffic. The horizontal alignment of the roadway approaches is good (rating of 7 for Approach Roadway Alignment) and the "Satisfactory Condition" rating of 6 for the Channel Protection evaluation indicates that among other things, that there are minor issues with slumping banks, creek migration and drift. The Scour Assessment's rating of 5 indicates that the bridge foundations, although they have been exposed by scour, are stable. The Waterway Adequacy's rating of 8 signifies that the bridge is above high water and that the approach roadway has a slight chance of being overtopped. The flooding evaluation is consistent with reports that the viaduct remained open during the 1993 flood and served as a critical connection to the downtown area. The current Structural Evaluation rating of 5 ("somewhat better than minimum adequacy") indicates that although there aren't any weight restrictions currently, the bridge does not have the same structural capacity as newer structures. The bridge's current rating of 3 for deck geometry is "basically intolerable requiring a high priority of corrective action" and makes the bridge `functionally obsolete". The 2030 Metropolitan Transportation Plan for CAMPO indicates ADTs of 4775 (count in 2005) and 6980 (projection for 2030). For both the 2001 to 5000 and >5000 ADT ranges, a 28'-0" roadway would increase the deck geometry rating to a 4 and the bridge no longer would be considered "functionally obsolete". MoDOT's intent regarding federally funded bridge projects is that they remove all deficiencies and that the bridge be reasonably expected to last a minimum of 25 years before developing any significant deficiencies. Consequently, federal funds can't be used to rehabilitate the viaduct unless it were to be widened by at least two feet to the 28'-0" width that would remove its "functionally obsolete" deficiency. The totality of the structural, functional and condition evaluations currently results in an NBI SI&A sufficiency rating of 66.5% and indicates that the bridge does qualify for partial federal bridge replacement funds (80% - 20% split) because the bridge is "functionally obsolete". Consequently, the SI&A does provide a recommendation to repair the general deterioration by rehabilitating the bridge with work done by contract (not by owner's forces). In the absence of City - specific information, the SI8r_A's cost estimate was developed by using nation-wide averages for new, widened and rehabilitated bridges. The SI&A's estimated total project cost of $1,884,000 (150% of bridge cost) is comprised of bridge work ($1,256,000), roadway improvement work ($125,000, or 10% of bridge cost) and incidentals. Additionally, the Non -State Structure Inspection Report prepared by MoDOT mentions the structural components (deck joints and concrete overlay) having notable deterioration and recommends possible methods of repair. 2 Field Observations Observations were made from on and around the bridge during the visual inspection opportunities. The descriptions and documentation of specific conditions found are summarized as follows: Figure 2: View from east of the viaduct that carries two lanes of vehicular traffic, pedestrians on two 5' wide sidewalks, and was part of the bike route for the 2008 Tour of Missouri. Figure 3: West approach narrows from 36'-0" (curb to curb) in front of the fire station to 26'-0" on the bridge. 3 Figure 4: Neoprene joint seals installed during previous repairs vary from good condition (left picture) to essentially missing (right picture) with many in bad shape that allow salt, dirt and moisture to help accelerate deterioration below. Figure 5: Traprock concrete overlay applied in 1985 needs repair in many locations, most often at the joints. 4 I11111lIMINIIIIMi • MIMI MI Figure 6: Locations of spalled concrete and exposed rebar often found along the curbs are more of an aesthetic issue than a structural or functional problem. Cracking of the 1985 overlay is worse in the eastern spans than to the west. Figure 7: Sealing of overlay will slow the deterioration but saturation of the concrete tee beams can't be reversed easily. 5 Figure 8: Sealing of overlay will slow the deterioration but cracking and leaching of tee beams can't be reversed easily. Figure 9: Diaphragms and bearing areas of some tee beams are deteriorating — inset shows a bearing at east abutment. 6 Figure 10: Spoiling and cracking of beam caps and columns along with the efflorescence found at many bents. Figure 11: Previous and future repairs to intermediate bents can only be expected to last 10 to 20 years±. Figure 12: Intermediate bents along and over Wears Creek get much taller and will make repair work more difficult and expensive. Drift and other debris restricting flow in the channel should be removed periodically. Figure 13: Span 11-12 has shifted due to temperature fluctuations and the change in bridge skew needed to better align with the UPRR. The 1985 rehabilitation did not reset the span but did take measures to prevent future movement. 8 Figure 14: The inspection report indicates that the concrete tee beams have cracked and spalled near the steel brackets added to intermediate bent no. 12 in 1985 to prevent continuing and accumulating movement of spans 11-12 and 12-13. Figure 15: Remnants of an unreinforced concrete retaining wall intended to provide bank protection along Wears Creek. 9 Superstructure Repair At an estimated construction cost of $187,000 shown below, the following construction activities will be required: • Remove any existing asphalt patching material and all deteriorated concrete. • Repair the existing 1'/2" overlay with a qualified concrete or special mortar in accordance with the specifications. • Apply Protective Surface Treatment for Concrete — Penetrating Sealers to the concrete overlay in accordance with the specifications. Penetrating sealers such as Pavon® Indeck or Star Macro Deck are often applied by cities, counties and MoDOT to their own structures rather than through contracted work. • The curbs can be addressed with either of two options — repair the curb to its as -built dimensions or build up the curb to a slightly bigger area. The additional area of a "blockout" would be mechanically attached to the curb with resin anchors — the repaired curb's concrete would rely on bond to the exposed rebar and may not last as long. • Clean and Epoxy Seal the concrete curbs and other surfaces around the drainage systems in accordance with the specifications. Quantities for concrete repairs commonly run over their estimates because of the inherent difficulty in determining accurately the structural integrity of large areas of the structure. Areas of deterioration are often estimated by sight only or with non-destructive methods when significant portions of the structure are accessible. For comparison purposes, 9875.3 ft2 of deck repair was done in 1985 (3300 ft2 had been estimated). The sealing of the deck to address the cracking of the existing 1'/2" overlay should be given a high priority because it is relatively inexpensive and would serve to protect the $417k investment made with the 1985 rehabilitation project - $310k of that investment was for deck repairs and the concrete overlay. Significant changes to the overlay, either through an additional overlay or as a removal with a replacement of an equal depth, are not recommended at this time. Consequently, there are no changes to the bridge's load ratings. Repair Item Estimated Quantity Estimated Cost Expected Life Repairing Concrete Deck (Half -Soling) 200 Square Feet $10,000 10-15 years± Repair the Curb or Construct a Curb Blockout 850 Linear Feet $102,000 Clean and Epoxy Seal the Curbs 7000 Square Feet $42,000 Superstructure Repair — Bearing Areas of Tee Beams 100 Square Feet $13,500 Penetrating Sealer Applied to the Roadway Surface 2420 Square Yards $19,360 3 to 5 years JO'-.; • .•17,113.44.; • .,. Sy'nn> .25w/ 2 v/ub A» have o .:.xrs/un/ �h.ekneas co, n.,//ey,. Jhan et' kood..v y u.rbN b be c -a / .nonp n//y of ,,/ b. T I:. _jf fug •FAI�.�C- '�C'n Ltn 436-7,1 ,_,.i.,W, i I 2e w3? 1 t Imo,:, .1 • • :}.- ��e ,',. -�. k 3 , f I I 1 EONde, I e A v, .i Wxf, //':^i-e.se. d't . 1 ;•i f_14:r/an/,/r.,4 V. l a.w� �•WPI • 1s • '.01•• s ±1.1o�_'i.1;k�e. ' �z7! V 0 F d 4r-z• r. r' TVC,-' y.' ;1.— Iz• i 3"3J• r/ : G''I• 2/ J 3"R'• > /5" /6' J } .L F l:F,^_ LPJYY C) CG HALF SECTION NEAR END SPAN OF CcA ce'c T[ 6EAMs U C 0 HALF SECTION NEAR MID SPAN Dr- Lo,icR.ETE TcE c‘crr,•;, Figure 16: Details of repairs to concrete overlay and curbs Replace all 17 Expansion Joints At an estimated construction cost of $150,000 shown below, the following construction activities will be required: • Remove the entire length of each of the 17 existing neoprene joint seals that had been bonded to concrete with epoxy. • Install the new expansion joints using the manufacturer's recommended procedures (surface preparation, etc.) and materials (two -component rapid curing liquid polymer and two -component silicone rubber sealant used for 10 the X J.S. option illustrated below). Expansion joints like the X.J.S. system have been installed by those agencies owning and maintaining bridges, but it can be done under contract as well. Repair Item Estimated Quantity Estimated Cost Expected Life Removal of Concrete Overlay and Existing Joint 410 Ft2 and 17 Each $10,000 10-20 years± X.J.S. Expansion Joint System 700 Linear Feet $140,000 7 Typ r t I Varies NleopreAe Jo1;,k Seal New l'z - ropreak s Wearing 5vrPoce exisf,ng Concrete decK and end de ap hr ag n9 -5a.vcci` cpen'na and eocm y neop,enC joi n f seal in place Don Corning 902 RCS Joint Sealant Concrete Silipi r 900 PNS 1':" x 3' :" (JR mm x 89 mm) X.35. Ekpqnsi:,, Sys -ft.-% Figure 17: Details for the existing neoprene joint seal (left) and for a new expansion joint like the X J.S. system (right). Repair of End Bent No. 1 and all 11 Intermediate Bents At an estimated construction cost of $273,000 shown below, the following construction activities will be required: • Remove the delaminated concrete in accordance with Section 704 of the Missouri Standard Specifications for Highway Construction. Per Section 704, the type of repair for the specifically defined areas will be outlined by the engineer during construction. • Use formed and unformed concrete repair of the delaminated and spalled areas. • Use Protective Coating — Concrete Bents and Piers (Epoxy) on the plan -defined areas of the beam caps, columns and diaphragms in accordance with Section 711 as protection against future deterioration. Quantities for concrete repairs commonly run over their estimates because of the inherent difficulty in determining accurately the structural integrity of large areas of the structure. Areas of deterioration are often estimated by sight only or with non-destructive methods when significant portions of the structure are accessible. For comparison purposes, 267.7 ft2 of similar type repairs were done to bents 2, 3, 4, 5 and 12 in 1985 (200 ft2 had been estimated). Concrete repairs in vertical or overhead applications have a much better chance to retain their integrity if a sufficient amount of clean reinforcement or other means of mechanical anchorage is available. If it is not, the newly applied concrete will have a shorter duration of effectiveness before it delaminates like the concrete that has fallen or been knocked down to the ground. Repair Item Estimated Quantity Estimated Cost Expected Life Substructure Repair — Formed and Unformed 1100 Square Feet $250,000 10-20 years± Protective Coating — Conc. Bents and Piers (Epoxy) 7500 Square Feet $22,500 1-7 ELEVATION OF EXISTING INTERMEDIATE BENT CROSS SECTION OF EXISTING INTERMEIDATE BENT Figure 18: Example details for substructure repair. 11 Bridge Replacment (Future Work) A total replacement of the bridge is not warranted at this time but will become a more and more cost-effective option as the frequency of rehabilitation projects continues to increase. For comparison purposes, the estimated cost of a new bridge (41'-8" wide out -to -out by 867'± long) that could be expected to last 50 to 75± years would be about $3,500,000. The 41'-8" width would provide a 28'-0" roadway with 16" concrete barrier curbs, 5'-0" sidewalks and a pedestrian fence on each side. The following are among the items that should be considered during the planning for and design of a new bridge: • Wears Creek hydraulics: A Flood Insurance Study has been done for this area. • The roadway width (curb to curb) needed for the desired level of service for the traffic on West High Street and the impact of a potentially wider bridge on High Street's connections to Missouri Boulevard. • The roadway width needed for the desired level of service for Missouri Boulevard traffic and its impact on the span over Missouri Boulevard and on the adjacent bridge (no. 2180004) over Wears Creek built at the same time as the viaduct. • The necessity of replacing the bridge given many alternative routes. Both McCarty Street and Main Street have at -grade intersections with the railroad and likely are more susceptible to flooding. • The proximity of the fire station to the viaduct. • Need for, number of, width of, and east end connectivity of sidewalk(s). • Use Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) walls at each end of the bridge. Use a U-shaped wall at the east end with one portion moved closer to Missouri Boulevard and with two parallel walls along each side of High Street that end close to where the existing cast -in -place retaining walls end. • Length and grade of bridge: The 867'± existing length could be reduced by moving the east abutment closer to Missouri Boulevard. The 4.5% grade would have to be maintained although a long, relatively steep bridge is not ideal for pedestrian purposes. The Thomas viaduct had terminated at Walnut Street (now Missouri Boulevard) and its steep grade (9%) reportedly caused problems. • Clearances (vertical and horizontal) to the railroad and Missouri Boulevard: the current vertical clearance to the UPRR is about 22' to the tee beam superstructure (4'± depth) — the railroads typically want a minimum of 23'. The vertical clearance to Missouri Boulevard is not shown on the plans or the SI&A — it is estimated to be 15' to 17' to the 4.5'± deep tee beam superstructure. • Coordination efforts with the railroad. • Location and types of expansion joints. • Type(s) of superstructure: a series of shorter, shallower concrete spans at each end (over the UPRR and Missouri Boulevard) with a series of longer, deeper spans (concrete or steel) over Wears Creek is a possible scenario. • The need for and cost of lighting. • The need for and cost of architectural enhancements like form liners and ornamental fencing. • Tall intermediate bents requiring larger diameter columns and bigger footings will be more expensive than a typical crossing's substructure. The repair and replacement costs described and shown in the tables above are bridge construction costs only. Costs associated with engineering services, desired roadway and/or sidewalk improvements, traffic handling, utility relocation efforts, temporary construction easements, railroad protective liability insurance and contractor mobilization are not included. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to the City of Jefferson under the Bridge Engineering Assistance Program. Please call should you have any questions. Sincerely /} ILUP Chris J. Criswell, P.F.. Cc: Mr. Dion Knipp, MoDOT — District 5 Mr. Jeff Aholt, MoDOT — Bridge Division 12 Bartlett &West Driving Community and Industry Forward,Together. November 15, 2021 Mr. David Bange, P.E. City Engineer City of Jefferson 320 E. McCarty Street Jefferson City, MO 65101 Re: High Street Viaduct in the City of Jefferson, MO Bridge No. 2180003 High Street Viaduct Study — Item No. EW 4.1 Dear Mr. Bange: We had opportunities to visit and view the bridge noted above and shown in the figures herein. The High Street viaduct is located in the City of Jefferson approximately 0.5 mile south of the U.S. 54/63 Missouri River bridges. This structure has been open to traffic since 1950 when it (originally Bridge No. L-148) was built to replace the 1913 -constructed C.W. Thomas Viaduct as part of a project administered by the Missouri State Highway Department on the behalf of the City and funded by city, state and federal governments. Figure 1: Missouri State Archives photo of the High Street viaduct constructed in 1949 and 1950 at a cost of $783k which would be worth about $8.5M in today's money; west abutment's retaining wall is in foreground. The observations summarized in this report support the conclusion that the best long-term solution for the bridge is that it should be replaced rather than widened and/or rehabilitated. It is difficult to predict when the bridge's condition ratings determined during formal inspections might drop to a serious or critical condition, so it may be prudent for the City to identify funding for the bridge's ultimate replacement and consider having a design ready so that a solution can be implemented quickly if needed. Issues and other considerations specific to replacing the bridge and how they affect the infrastructure that surrounds the bridge are described in greater detail on pages 18 to 20 of this report. Bridge replacement exhibits (plan view and typical section) and a detailed cost estimate can be found in the appendix at the end of this report. It is also feasible to delay the significant expenditure of funds to replace the bridge by considering repair strategies described in greater detail on pages 16 to 18 of this report that would help obtain a little more service life until it is practical to replace the bridge. These bridge repairs are similar in some ways to those made in 1985 by contract (i.e., not by the City's forces) as a City project. The estimated cost of bridge repairs, while considerably less than that for a replacement, are significant as well. Given the expected life of those repairs, this option should not be considered the optimum approach. Until the time that the bridge is repaired or replaced by contract, it is recommended that the City: a.) monitor the concrete deck, curb, superstructure and substructure for increased cracking, spalls and delaminations, 1719 SOUTHRIDGF: DR. SUITE 100 • JEFFERSON C IT , MO 65109-4000 573.634.3181 • FAX 573.634.7904 • 866.869.8031 u'wW.13.4 RTW EST.CO M b.) continue proactively removing delaminated concrete that might otherwise fall on or near traffic (vehicular and pedestrian), c.) remove drift that may accumulate at the intermediate bents, and d.) understand that the deck and/or superstructure rating can officially drop from a poor condition (`4' bridge inspection rating) to serious (`3') when the next biennial inspection currently scheduled for late 2023 is conducted or when they are done in future years. Typically, bridges in Missouri are closely monitored if reaching the '3' condition and closed when reaching a critical condition (2'). The bridge is not likely to have structural integrity issues for the next 5 to 10 years, but the timeframe is difficult to predict as weather and salt usage affects a bridge's longevity, and the general response to time varies among bridges. Existing Bridge Conditions — High Street Viaduct The High Street viaduct has a posted speed limit of 30 m.p.h. (20 m.p.h. in front of St. Peter Interparish School), does not have a posted weight limit, is on the City's Gold bus route, and crosses Missouri Boulevard, Wears Creek and two spur lines of the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR). West High Street, currently classified as an "Urban Collector", currently carries approximately 5685 vehicles per day and is projected to have an Average Daily Traffic (ADT) count of 9380 in 2039 according to the National Bridge Inventory (NBI) Structure Inventory and Appraisal (SI&A) Sheet. These traffic numbers far exceed the volumes found on traffic volume maps found on MoDOT's website, but they do not affect the decisions how to repair or replace the bridge. The two-lane roadway approaches lead to an 867'± long bridge having a 26'-0" wide roadway and carrying two lanes for two-way vehicular traffic. Both the west and east approaches have wider roadways (curb to curb) than the bridge, but the additional widths are utilized for parallel parking. The bridge's substructure units consist of parallel retaining walls and a hollow abutment at the east end, a vertical wall abutment at the west end, and 11 intermediate bents that are founded on pile footings. The superstructure consists of six lines of cast -in -place concrete tee beams with 5'-0" wide sidewalks, 20" tall concrete curbs and 3'-0"± tall, galvanized steel handrails on each side. Each of the 12 tee beam spans are simple spans with the first 10 being square (no skew) and the two western -most spans varying in skew to accommodate the two sets of railroad tracks underneath. Given the simple span construction, there are 17 expansion joints located along the full length of the bridge. The structure is inspected on a biennial basis, which was last done on October 26, 2021, so another general inspection is expected before the end of 2023. An underwater inspection (to be done every 5 years) was also completed in October 2021 and a special inspection (to be done every 6 years) was last done in March 2017. The NBI SI&A condition ratings for the deck, superstructure and substructure currently are 4 ("Poor"), 4 ("Poor") and 5 ("Fair"), respectively, on a scale of 0 (failed condition) to 9 (excellent condition) with a rating of 4 or less for any one of the condition ratings making the bridge be categorized as "Structurally Deficient". The horizontal alignment of the roadway approaches is good (rating of 7 for Approach Roadway Alignment), and the "Satisfactory Condition" rating of 5 for the Channel Protection evaluation indicates that, among other things, there are minor issues with slumping banks, creek migration and drift. The Scour Assessment's rating of 8 indicates that the bridge foundations are stable and no scour has been observed. The current Structural Evaluation rating of 4 ("meeting tolerable limits") is controlled by the '4' condition ratings rather than the bridge's load carrying capacity for an HS vehicle. The Underclearance rating of '4' driven by the horizontal clearance between Missouri Boulevard and the intermediate bent west of it does not make the bridge deficient, but clearances should be improved with a replacement structure. The Waterway Adequacy's rating of 8 signifies that the bridge is above high water and that the east approach has a slight chance of being overtopped. The flooding evaluation is consistent with reports that the viaduct remained open during the 1993 flood and served as a critical connection to the downtown area. In contrast, the C.W. Thomas Viaduct (shorter bridge on 9% grade ending at what's now Missouri Blvd.) replaced by the High Street viaduct was subject to flooding events far more common than the 1993 flooding. Figure 2: Missouri State Archives photo of the Thomas Viaduct during 1947 flooding two years prior to construction starting on the existing High Street viaduct that has served since then as an all-weather crossing. 2 The bridge's current rating of 3 for deck geometry would have made the bridge `Functionally Obsolete" using criteria and terminology that the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) no longer uses and which MoDOT has begun phasing out. For both the 2001 to 5000 and >5000 ADT ranges, a 28'-0" roadway would increase the deck geometry rating to a 4 and the bridge would not be considered "Functionally Obsolete" even under past criteria. The totality of the structural, functional and condition evaluations currently results in an NBI SI&A sufficiency rating of 37.9%. This indicates that the bridge, had West High Street not been classified as an Urban Collector, would have qualified for full federal bridge replacement funds (80% - 20% federal — local split) because the bridge is classified as "Structurally Deficient" currently and will be designated as "Poor" as MoDOT changes their categorization terminology for off -system bridges. Consequently, the SI&A does provide a recommendation to replace the bridge with work done by contract (not by owner's forces). In the absence of site -specific information, the SI&A's cost estimate was developed by using Missouri -wide averages for typical new, widened and rehabilitated bridges. The SI&A's estimated total project cost of $4,987,000 (150% of bridge cost) is comprised of bridge work ($3,324,000), roadway improvement work ($332,000, or 10% of bridge cost) and incidentals. As described in greater detail on pages 18 to 20, the High Street viaduct is not a typical bridge, and the SI&A's cost estimate does not account for several things in play at this location. Existing Roadway Conditions — West High Street The existing roadway approaches along West High Street vary from the bridge typical section. To the west, the road is 40 -feet wide back -of -curb to back -of -curb. This section includes a parking lane on the south side of the roadway. The south side of the road narrows as it approaches the bridge, and the parking lane is tapered out. To the east, the roadway is significantly wider at 60 -feet back -of -curb to back -of -curb. This section again includes a parking lane only on the south side of the road (beginning east of the intersection with Mulberry). The existing pavement width to the north is utilized for city transit services in conjunction with a school loading/unloading zone between 7 AM and 5 PM on weekdays for St. Peter Interparish School. Additionally, the east side of the viaduct currently includes a unique intersection between West High Street and Mulberry Street as shown in Figure 3 below: Figure 3: East Approach Roadway (Google Earth used for base map) The south slip lane allows for vehicles from Missouri Boulevard to access eastbound High Street while the north slip lane allows for westbound High Street to access Missouri Boulevard. There is no access for the remaining movements between these roads (eastbound High Street to Missouri Boulevard or Missouri Boulevard to westbound High Street). The south slip lane also provides right-in/right-out (RIRO) access to a state parking lot situated south of High Street. There is an additional full access driveway to this parking lot further to the southwest from Missouri Boulevard. At the crossing of the High Street viaduct over Missouri Boulevard, there is approximately 14'-5" of vertical clearance between the bridge superstructure and the roadway. 14'-6" of vertical clearance is recommended for city streets like West High Street that are not located in a commercial zone. Immediately adjacent to the viaduct, the slip lanes connect 3 to Missouri Boulevard. Additionally, traffic in the southbound direction adds an extra lane as Missouri Boulevard widens from 3- to 4 -lanes. Wears Creek flows under the High Street viaduct bridge as well as a small bridge on Missouri Boulevard built at the same time as the viaduct and also in need of rehabilitation or eventual replacement. This portion of Wears Creek includes a floodway, so any improvements need to consider hydraulic implications to the stream and floodplain. This area of floodplain has been included in a detailed hydrologic and hydraulic investigation summarized in a Flood Insurance Study (FIS) overseen by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The FIS has an effective date of November 2, 2012 and indicates that this stretch of Wears Creek has the 100 -year annual chance flood elevation controlled by backwater effects from the Missouri River. This may provide some flexibility in what improvements could be considered without impacting the hydraulics for this region of the stream. Field Observations Observations were made from on and around the bridge during the visual inspection opportunities. The descriptions and documentation of specific conditions found are summarized as follows: Figure 4: View from east of the viaduct that carries two lanes of vehicular traffic on a 26'-0" roadway and pedestrians on two 5'-0" wide sidewalks who must cross slip lanes to and from Missouri Boulevard. Figure 5: The west approach narrows from 36'-0" (curb to curb) in front of the fire station to 26'-O" on the bridge. 4 Figure 6: Easterly view of the viaduct that carries two lanes of vehicular traffic on a 26' roadway and pedestrians on two 5' wide sidewalks. A replacement bridge could have either a 26' or 28' roadway, raised curbs and 5' or 6' wide sidewalks. Figure 7: The viaduct's pedestrians are separated from vehicular traffic by 20" tall barriers with handrails on the outside. A replacement bridge would have a 32" concrete barrier on the outside with an additional height of decorative railing. 5 Figure 8: Northbound view showing the viaduct's 14'-5" minimum vertical clearance to Missouri Blvd. A replacement bridge would provide at least 14'-6" vertical clearance and more horizontal clearance to the west -side intermediate bent. Figure 9: View along southbound Missouri Boulevard showing the bridge over Wears Creek in the foreground and the viaduct in the background. Existing bridge shows no evidence of ever being hit by an oversized vehicle. 6 Figure 10: Two spur lines of the Union Pacific Railroad pass under the western -most span of the bridge and are adjacent to a tall vertical wall abutment (left) and an intermediate bent constructed with a collision wall (right). Figure 11: View looking east along the hollow east abutment and south slip lane from Missouri Boulevard to eastbound West High Street. A replacement bridge slightly wider than the existing would reduce the width of the south slip lane. 7 Figu re 12: Neoprene joint seals installed during previous repairs generally are in fair condition with Bent 3 (right) being o ne exception. Missin g or failing seals in the past have allowed salt, dirt and moisture to accelerate deterior ation below. Figu re 13: 1985 concrete overlay has nee ded more significant and more frequent repairs in recent ye ars and has outlived its effective lifespan. Condition of deck a nd superstru cture would keep a new overlay from being a cost-eff ective option as the saturation of the existing concrete beneath it is the basis for the po or condition rating of '4'. 8 Figure 14: Locations of spalled concrete and exposed rebar often found along the curbs are more of an aesthetic issue than a structural or functional problem. Sealing of cracks in the 1985 concrete overlay is common throughout. Figure 15: Repairs to overlay can slow the deterioration but saturation of the concrete tee beams can't be reversed. 9 Figure 16: January 2010 (top) and August 2021 (bottom) views of a cracked concrete tee beam at Intermediate Bent 3. Lack of significant change in 11+ years indicates that movement has not occurred, and load path has not been affected. 10 Figure 17: Diaphragms and bearing areas of some tee beams are deteriorating — inset shows a bearing at east abutment. Interior beams 2 and 5 of 6 that are nearest the curbs (and deck drainage) have the greatest level of deterioration. Figure 18: Spalling and cracking of beam caps and columns can be found at many bents with deterioration most severe at the east end. Broken concrete has accumulated beneath Bent 5 whose short columns are typical at the east end. 11 Figure 19: Repairs to intermediate bents can only be expected to last 10 to 20 years±. A U-shaped MSE wall would be used to reduce the footprint area and construction cost of a replacement bridge. - .r Figure 20: Bents along Wears Creek get much taller and would make repairs more difficult and expensive. Drift and debris restricting flow should be removed periodically. Web wall and column deterioration has increased in recent years. 12 Figure 21: Collision wall similar to existing bridge's partial height wall will be necessary at the intermediate bent near the UPRR tracks. No significant changes have occurred in recent years to the concrete tee beams that cracked and spalled when steel brackets were added to bent no. 12 in 1985 to prevent accumulating movement of spans 11-12 and 12-13. Figure 22: Remnants of concrete retaining wall located upstream of the Missouri Boulevard bridge that was intended to provide bank protection along Wears Creek. Bank has remained stable enough that parking lot remains out of danger. 13 Figure 23: The original construction of the viaduct's west abutment consisted of a very tall vertical wall nearly parallel to the curved UPRR tracks underneath, and a south -side retaining wall wing roughly parallel to West High Street. A two -tiered wall system on north side of West High Street now provides separation with MoDOT facilities. `F" tlf `flit! jj -ITIL !li_!11I7rt_ ili L L .. ;TO T Iffl T�l]i IN I :T.,,w 11�ylfllIDl III, PjII i l l f! sny MilmwPisol wieenc m cur ®ems ?v s Figure 24: A two -tiered wall system at the west -end abutment is comprised of cast -in -place and Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) walls near the top of a steep slope. The replacement bridge's west abutment could set sufficiently behind a U-shaped MSE wall so that the driven steel H -piles clear the existing footing which utilizes vertical and battered piles. 14 Figure 25: A two -tiered wall system at the west abutment is comprised of a cast -in -place wall at the base and a MSE wall near the top of a steep slope. Replacement bridge's west abutment could set behind a U-shaped MSE wall. Figure 26: Easterly view along approach guardrail in a narrow grassy area adjacent to a small block MSE wall on the north side of West High Street just beyond the west abutment. 15 Considerations for Short -Term and Intermediate Time Frames The observations summarized in this report support the conclusion that the best long-term solution for the bridge is that it should be replaced. It is recommended that the City consider initiating the design project to replace the bridge while continuing to monitor and maintain the structure throughout its remaining design life given the considerable amount of time that railway crossing projects normally take to develop. It is also feasible to delay the significant expenditure of funds to replace the bridge by considering repair strategies described in greater detail on pages 17 and 18 that would help realise a little more service life until it is practical to replace the bridge. The estimated repair costs, while considerably less than that for a replacement, are significant as well. Given the expected life of those repairs, this option should not be considered the optimum approach. Until the time that the bridge is replaced, it is recommended that the City: a.) monitor the concrete deck, curb, superstructure and substructure units for increased cracking, spalls and delaminations, b.) continue proactively removing delaminated concrete that might otherwise fall on or near traffic (vehicular and pedestrian), c.) remove drift that may accumulate at the intermediate bents, and d.) understand that the deck and/or superstructure rating can officially drop from a poor condition ('4' bridge inspection rating) to serious (`3') when the next biennial inspection currently scheduled for late 2023 is conducted or when they are done in future years. It should be noted that the water saturation of the deck noted on the Bridge Inspection Report cannot be the basis for reducing the condition rating below a '4'. Only if the deck were in structural distress and/or have areas in need of repair could the rating be reduced from a '4' to something lower. Superstructures with a condition rating of '4' often have heavy disintegration, deterioration, saturation, leaching and considerable section loss in exposed reinforcing steel. The rating can be reduced to a '3' on superstructures that have worsened in condition or have a shear crack or combination of shear cracks that affect the structural integrity of the bridge. Typically, bridges in Missouri are closely monitored if reaching the '3' condition and closed when reaching a critical condition (2'). However, the viaduct's specific conditions, and its structural and load distribution characteristics should be considered if reaching the serious (`3') or critical (`2') conditions. Specifically, as shown in Figure 27, the viaduct's tee beam superstructure has full -depth concrete diaphragms that could provide superstructure -to -substructure load transfer should the condition of the webs bearing on the phosphor bronze bearing plates continue to deteriorate and lose some of their structural capacity. Partial -depth concrete diaphragms provide stability and load distribution between and among the tee beams, but do not function in load transfer to the substructure. Consequently, it can become necessary on those bridges' deteriorating tee beam superstructures to install supplemental supports, i.e., fabricated steel bearing systems, to help transfer vehicular live loads and superstructure dead loads to the substructure. Figure 27 shows an example of what has been done to extend the service life of a concrete tee beam bridge with partial depth diaphragms. Figure 27: Tee beams (bottom picture) with partial depth concrete diaphragms need supplemental supports when concrete webs setting on bearing plates crack, spall or delaminate. The viaduct's tee beams (top picture) have full -depth concrete diaphragms which can transfer load if and when the tee beam webs cannot. 16 Deck, Joint, Barrier, Superstructure and Substructure Repairs The bridge superstructure repairs done in 1985 consisted primarily of installing expansion joint seals, doing partial depth and full depth deck repair, and resurfacing the entire bridge deck with a new 11/2" thick traprock wearing surface. Given that a concrete overlay normally can't be expected to last much more than 25 years, the removal and replacing of the concrete overlay would normally be considered one repair strategy to be further evaluated. To aid bridge engineers in their decision -making process regarding the numerous types of bridge wearing surface options available, MoDOT's Engineering Policy Guide (EPG) provides a flowchart utilizing bridge condition ratings and common deck tests (chloride content, half -cell potential and fraction plane percentage) with which to select the appropriate overlay. For typical bridges with condition ratings of '4', '4' and '5' like the viaduct has, the EPG flowchart recommends that the bridge be replaced rather than redecked or its superstructure replaced. As described in much greater detail on pages 18 to 20, the High Street viaduct is no typical bridge, so it may be beneficial at least for comparison purposes to investigate what repairs could be done to the bridge. Accordingly, the following bridge repair activities could be required. Their quantities, costs and life expectancy are summarized in Table 1 on the following page. • Remove any existing asphalt or concrete patching materials, as well as the 11/2" traprock concrete overlay from between the concrete curbs from one bridge end to another. An additional 1/2" of scarification would be done as well either with hydro demolition or conventional mechanical removal (CMR) to provide a bondable surface for the new concrete wearing surface. • Address the condition of the concrete deck with partial depth and full depth repairs. The estimated amount of these repairs is best determined using methods outside the scope of this project. Quantities for concrete repairs commonly run over their estimates because of the inherent difficulties in determining accurately the structural integrity of large areas of the structure. Areas of deterioration are often estimated by sight only or with non-destructive methods when significant portions of the structure are accessible. • Replace the existing 11/2" overlay with a 2" thick latex modified concrete overlay. Because there is no change in the net thickness of the overlay, there are no changes to the bridge's load ratings. • Install the new expansion joints using the manufacturer's recommended procedures (surface preparation, etc.) and materials (two -component rapid curing liquid polymer and two -component silicone rubber sealant used for the X J.S. system). Expansion joints like the X J.S. system have been installed by those agencies owning and maintaining bridges, but it can be done under contract as well. The expansion joint work would have to be done if repair work to the substructure units were to have any lasting value. • The curbs can be addressed with either of two options — repair the curb to its as -built dimensions or build up the curb to a slightly bigger area. The additional area of a "block out" would be mechanically attached to the curb with resin anchors — the repaired curb's concrete would rely on bond to the exposed rebar and may not last as long. • Apply Protective Surface Treatment for Concrete — Penetrating Sealers to the concrete overlay. Penetrating sealers such as the Silane surface treatment or Star Macro Deck are often applied by cities, counties and MoDOT to their own structures rather than through contracted work. • Repair as needed the bearing areas of the cast -in -place concrete tee beams. It is not recommended that span 11-12 on the west end of the bridge be realigned to its original position as was recommended, but not done, during the 1985 rehabilitation work. • Treat and protect concrete surfaces by applying a penetrating sealer to the concrete deck and an epoxy sealer to the curbs. • Concrete repairs in vertical or overhead applications have a much better chance to retain their integrity if enough clean reinforcement or other means of mechanical anchorage is available. If it is not, the newly applied concrete will have a shorter duration of effectiveness before it delaminates like the concrete that has already fallen or been knocked down to the ground. Consequently, for those substructure areas like the beam caps of all intermediate bents, an alternative to traditional formed and unformed repairs that utilize thin amounts of patching materials is to encase three sides of the beam cap (bottom and two sides) with a thicker amount of higher quality concrete that is reinforced and its mechanical connection to the existing beam caps achieved with resin anchor systems. • Use formed and unformed concrete repair of the delaminated and spalled areas at the two end bents and the intermediate bents' columns and tie beams. • Treat and protect the concrete surfaces closest to the joints by applying an epoxy coating as protection against future deterioration. The surfaces to be protected are generally described here as the concrete diaphragm in the superstructure, the entire beam cap and a portion of the columns and tie beams of the intermediate bents. 17 Table 1: Estimated Quantities and Costs of Bride Rehabilitation Repair Item Estimated Quantity Estimated Cost Expected Life Removal of Concrete Wearing Surface 21,712 Square Feet $70,000 N.A. Total Surface Hydro Demolition r 2412 Square Yards $85,000 N.A. Removal of Existing Expansion Joint Seal or Sealant 699 Linear Feet $21,000 N.A. Partial Removal of Substructure Concrete 8800 Square Feet $150,000 N.A. Repairing Concrete Deck (Half -Soling) 6000 Square Feet $420,000 N.A. Full Depth Repair 900 Square Feet $54,000 N.A. Latex Modified Concrete Wearing Surface 2412 Square Yards $300,000 10-20 years± X.J.S. Expansion Joint System 699 Linear Feet $42,000 three times 5-10 years± Repair the Curb or Construct a Curb Block out 1200 Linear Feet $216,000 10-20 years± Clean and Epoxy Seal the Curbs 10,000 Square Feet $100,000 10-20 years± Superstructure Repair — Bearing Areas of Tee Beams 500 Square Feet $100,000 10-20 years± Penetrating Sealer Applied to the Bridge Deck Surface 2412 Square Yards $30,000 two times 10 years Substructure Repair — Formed and Unformed 3200 Square Feet $670,000 10-20 years± Class B-2 Concrete (for reinforced encasement of caps) 200 Cubic Yards $600,000 10-20 years± Protective Coating — Concrete Bents and Piers (Epoxy) 12,000 Square Feet $120,000 10-20 years± Bridge Rehabilitation Total $3,092,000 10-20 years± The repair costs described and shown in the tables above are bridge construction costs only. Costs associated with engineering services, desired roadway and/or sidewalk improvements off the ends of the bridge, traffic handling, utility relocation efforts, temporary construction easements, railroad -related considerations and contractor mobilization are not included. The full engineering and drafting services needed to provide contract -ready documents for a bridge rehabilitation are beyond the scope of this study. Any major rehabilitation work done to the bridge makes the structure ineligible for federal funding for 10 years even if it is funded locally; the repairs listed on pages 17 and 18 do not constitute a major rehabilitation. Bridge Replacement Considerations and Impacts on Surrounding Infrastructure The reconstruction of the viaduct will have a number of ripple impacts to the surrounding infrastructure which must be considered. On the west end of the bridge, the existing industrial rail spurs for the Union Pacific Railroad pass under the bridge. The existing structure provides less than current standards for vertical clearance over this rail line so any reconstruction option will likely need to provide a grade raise to accommodate additional room. This will require reconstruction of the roadway for several hundred feet to allow a smooth profile to tie in with the existing road. It is anticipated that the reconstruction will retain the parking on the south of the road and narrow down to match the new proposed bridge width at a similar location as currently utilized. A U-shaped MSE wall will be utilized to limit impacts to adjacent properties that include a MoDOT building and the Union Pacific Railroad. On the east end, there are a variety of options, including shortening or lengthening the bridge and adding or removing access between West High Street and Missouri Boulevard. For the purposes of this study, the focus has been on reconstructing the east roadway approach in a way that maintains all current access while minimizing total bridge and roadway costs. To this end, the primary option includes shortening the bridge length by eliminating three spans and the hollow abutment at the east end to reduce overall project costs. This will require the construction of a U-shaped MSE retaining wall to retain the roadway fill while maintaining use of the slip lanes between West High Street and Missouri Boulevard. Additional vertical clearance above Missouri Boulevard could also be achieved with slight modifications to the profile of the replacement bridge. The reconstruction of the east end of the bridge with an MSE wall will need to account for sight distance requirements for the north slip lane which accesses Missouri Boulevard. Based on the current configuration of the intersection, crosswalk and stop bar, a minimum of 50' behind the current Missouri Boulevard curb line is anticipated as necessary to maintain sight distance. The final location of the intermediate bent supporting this end span may adjust this setback distance up or down slightly. 18 Bridge replacement exhibits (plan view and typical section) and an engineer's opinion of probable construction cost can be found in the appendix that follows. It is expected that with accurate survey data and more refined structural and roadway design work, it may be possible to reduce project costs. The following are among the items that were considered when developing the exhibits and cost opinion. • The cost to remove the existing bridge is significant and is not included in the project cost estimate shown in MoDOT's SI&A report. Working over and near a railway requires additional precautions and approvals. Additionally, the vertical wall abutment at the west end of the bridge adjacent to the MoDOT and UPRR properties will be a significant undertaking. • Coordination efforts with the railroad: The costs associated with gaining railroad approvals during design and construction are not included in the project cost estimate shown in MoDOT's SI&A report. Railway projects can take considerable time to develop. For example, MoDOT allocates a minimum of 24 months between the completion of survey work and the bid letting. • Wears Creek hydraulics: A Flood Insurance Study has been completed for this portion of Wears Creek. The MSE walls and the embankment that they retain are set back beyond the limits of the floodway. However, the increase in the 100 -year flood elevation caused by embankment encroachment onto the 100 -year floodplain has not yet been determined. • Wears Creek scour: For cost estimation purposes, footing elevations for new intermediate bents were assumed to be below the existing footings as means of protection against scour. The elevation of tie beams for the taller intermediate bents was assumed to be above the 1993 flood elevation. Both of these assumptions are conservative and resulted in column heights at the west end of the bridge that far exceeded what's seen on more typical bridges. All elevations should be evaluated during preliminary bridge design and do present an opportunity to refine and reduce the cost of the intermediate bents especially relating to the sizes of the pile footings and diameters of the two telescoping columns assumed for each intermediate bent. • Tall intermediate bents: The sizes of footings, columns and beam caps for those taller bents (50' to 60' tall) in, over and west of Wears Creek were conservatively estimated. The sizes of structural components and resulting costs confirmed that the substructure construction will constitute a much higher percentage of the overall bridge costs than typically encountered. Because the average cost of the typical Missouri bridges used for the SI&A's cost estimate could not and did not account for atypical bent geometry and costs, the bridge cost estimate on MoDOT's SI&A would be considered an underestimate caused by this one item alone. • Geotechnical information: Boring logs or other information with which to estimate depths to rock were not available, so information from the recently constructed Dunklin Street bridge over Wears Creek was used to estimate pile lengths. The depth to rock was deemed too great for drilled shaft foundations to be economical, so footings with steel H -piles were assumed. • Overall bridge width (out to out): The current bridge has a 26'-0" roadway and 5'-O" sidewalks on both sides. The replacement bridge was assumed to have a 28'-0" roadway and 6'-0" sidewalks on both sides. A narrower roadway width, narrower sidewalks, or having a sidewalk just on the south side that appears to have much more pedestrian traffic than the north side can be options to be considered during design. Additionally, most bridges do not have sidewalks, so the estimated bridge cost found on MoDOT's SI&A report most likely did not include an allowance for sidewalks. • Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) walls at each end of the bridge: Use a U-shaped wall at the east end with one portion moved closer to Missouri Boulevard than the existing abutment and with two parallel walls along each side of High Street that terminate close to where the existing cast -in -place retaining walls end. The west - end MSE wall would be U-shaped as well but will be more difficult and expensive to construct because of its height and proximity to UPRR and MoDOT facilities. Both walls have far greater square footage values than a typical bridge due in large part to their lengths (both east and west ends) and height (west end). • Horizontal clearances to Missouri Boulevard: As noted earlier in the report, the east abutment will be set back from Missouri Boulevard and the first intermediate bent on the west side of the street will allow room for a sidewalk and provide more horizontal clearance than the current 4'-11" dimension. • Horizontal clearances to the railroad: The replacement bridge's western -most intermediate bent will have a minimum horizontal clearance that exceeds UPRR's absolute minimum, but it will be less than 25'-0" so a collision wall will be necessary. • Vertical clearance to Missouri Boulevard: The current vertical clearance to Missouri Boulevard is not shown on the plans but is noted as 14'-5" on the SI&A and Bridge Inspection Report. 14'-6" of vertical clearance is recommended for roads and streets in cities not located in a commercial zone, so a slab -on -girder superstructure with a series of spans (90'-95'-95'-90') utilizing prestressed concrete NU 43 girders (— 43" tall) at the east end would result in a superstructure depth similar to that of the existing superstructure and any grade raise that might be needed should be minimal. • Vertical clearances to the railroad: The current vertical clearance to the UPRR is just under 22'-2" to the tee beam superstructure (4'± depth), roughly 14" less than the railroad's requirement to have at least 23'-4" of 19 vertical clearance. Given the existing vertical clearance and the amount of rail traffic, it may be possible to pursue a design exception for vertical clearance with UPRR. If that is not realized, a relatively shallow slab -on - girder superstructure with a series of spans (70'-70'-76') with NU 35 girders along with a grade raise would be necessary. Span lengths are generally proportional to superstructure depth so the shorter spans of a shallower superstructure result in a greater number of intermediate bents. • Alternative type(s) of superstructure: Prestressed concrete I -girder or NU girder bridges are often more economical in Missouri than steel girders for typical short to medium span bridges. Because of its very tall and expensive intermediate bents, a series of longer spans (concrete or steel) over Wears Creek may be found during design to be more cost-effective. Steel plate girders should be investigated for the western portion of the bridge where longer spans can lead to a fewer number of intermediate bents and where the girder depth likely will have to transition from shallow over the UPRR to meet vertical clearance requirements to a deeper section needed for the longer spans. Such a transition in depth is more easily accomplished with steel girders than with prestressed concrete. • Location and types of the expansion joint(s): Bridge expansion joints are often where deterioration starts in the deck and superstructure as well as serving to expose the substructure to dirt, moisture and chlorides. This report documents the effect that expansion joints and deleterious agents have had on the viaduct. Consequently, modern designs strive to minimize or eliminate expansion joints. Because of the length of the bridge, it was thought to be necessary to have one expansion joint where the girder type changed and to consider having one at the west end as well. Because of the significant grade of the bridge, means to prevent the bridge from creeping downhill over time from its own weight should be evaluated during design. • Bridge approach slabs: Not all bridges have bridge approach slabs constructed, so it is very likely that the estimated bridge cost found in MoDOT's SI&A report did not include the cost of bridge approach slabs. • Decorative lighting: The existing bridge has conduit and light poles with wires running from pole to pole. The cost opinion assumes that two 2" diameter conduit may be needed and assumed that lighting would be similar to that used on the Dunklin Street bridge replacement. • Ornamental fencing. For cost estimation purposes, fencing similar to that used for the Dunklin Street bridge was assumed. Modern bridges over railroads are required to have taller fencing so allowance was made to have taller decorative railing in the span over the UPRR. One could consider approaching the railroad to have a design exception given the limited amount of pedestrian traffic on the bridge and the infrequent track usage by UPRR. A constant height of fencing along the entire length of bridge would have cost and aesthetics benefits. The estimated bridge replacement project costs outlined in the appendix do not include costs associated with utility relocations, temporary construction easements, right-of-way and railroad -related costs (protective liability insurance, engineering reviews, flagging, etc.). We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to the City of Jefferson. Please call should you have any questions. Sincerely, Chris J. Criswell, P.E. 00 t l I 1 1 1 10/i x,�� S OF A4/8 ///, , .\` '% �P �•-• G c°,, CHRISTOPHER J. CRISWELL -o NUMBER �� P=-0.8-05 (c,\ NN '', ,1jNAL1\\�� THIS SHEET HAS BEEN SIGNED, SEALED AND DATED ELECTRONICALLY. Date Prepared: November 15, 2021 • 20 APPENDIX: BRIDGE REPLACEMENT EXHIBITS END BRIDGE 500 -YEAR F •ODPLAIN MSE WALL INTERMEDIATE BENT (TYP) FLOODWAY 100 -YEAR FLOODPLAIN FLOODWAY MSE WALL i i 100-YEARRLOODPLAIN S CREEK BEGIN BRIDGE 500 -YEAR FLOODPLAIN L v m I m O W ❑ Z Q 0 > U H F- Z C 0 W LL 00w = DESIGNED BY; PAB DRAWN BY PAB APPROVED BY: AK.) PRO) NO: 16197.210 SCALE: AS NOTED DATE: SEPTEMBER 2021 SHEET NUMBER 1 OF 1 1-1 42'-6" OUT -TO -OUT 28'-0" ROADWAY RAILROAD FENCE - /r// 14" 6'-0" SDWK & CURB DECORATIVE RAILING (TYP) SIDEWALK 1▪ ° 1% 14'-0" LANE 14'-0" LANE 1" SYMMETRICAL ABOUT STRUCTURE 2% PRESTRESSED CONCRETE NU GIRDER (TYP) 5 GIRDERS SPACED AT 9' - 0" CTS. UNIT 1 - NU43 2% 1 / 14" "I / 6'-0" SDWK & CURB FORM LINER (TYP) SIDEWALK —\ 1% z z / N c N O Qd cc W O cc co 8 3' CAST -IN -PLACE SLAB WITH PERMISSIBLE STEEL STAY -IN -PLACE FORMS NOTES: C STRUCTURE, CROWN DECK DRAINAGE DETAILS NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY. & PROFILE GRADE CONDUIT DETAILS NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY LIGHT POSTS, ARMS AND LUMINARIES NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY UNIT 2 - NU35 1 SHEET NUMBER u_ 0 N 0 z a 0_ a w a 0 1-1 N N rn Z O i— Cr) <%. _155 Z >_ co w W LLL • 2 • CW CC 4-+ Drawing Name: W:\Proj\16000\16197\16197.210\AutoCad\Presentation\typical.dwg Layout Name: Layoutl Plotted By: AK301272 Plotted on: 8/30/2021 3:46:27 PM Bartlett West Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Date: September 23, 2021 B&W Project No.: 16197.210 High Street Viaduct - Roadway Estimate Jefferson City, Missouri City Project No.: n/a Item No. Description Quantity Unit Engineer's Estimate Unit Price Total Cost Roadway 1 Removal of Improvements 1 LS 30,000.00 $30,000.00 2 Earthwork 1 LS 200,000.00 $200,000.00 3 3" Aggregate Stone Base 5,687 SY 7.50 $42,652.50 4 Asphalt Mill, 1.5 in. 304 SY 10.00 $3,040.00 5 Bituminous Pavement Mixture, Surface (BP -1), 1.5 in. 3,947 SY 15.00 $59,205.00 6 Bituminous Pavement Mixture, Base, 8.5 in. 3,643 SY 40.00 $145,720.00 7 Truncated Domes 120 SF 30.00 $3,600.00 8 Concrete Sidewalk, 4 in. 1,086 SY 45.00 $48,870.00 9 Concrete Curb Ramps and Landings, 6in. 80 SY 110.00 $8,800.00 10 8" PCC Commercial Concrete Drive 111 SY 75.00 $8,325.00 11 Curb and Gutter 2,873 LF 30.00 $86,190.00 12 Maintenance of Traffic 1 LS 20,000.00 $20,000.00 13 Concrete Traffic Barrier, Type B 635 LF 125.00 $79,375.00 14 Mobilization 1 LS 100,000.00 $100,000.00 15 6" White Pavement Marking (Waterborne) 297 LF 0.75 $222.75 16 4" Broken Yellow Pavement Marking (Waterborne) 45 LF 0.50 $22.50 17 4" Solid Yellow Pavement Marking (Waterborne) 62 LF 0.50 $31.00 18 24" Solid White Pavement Marking (Preformed Thermoplastic) 0 LF 7.00 $0.00 19 30" Solid White Midblock Crossing Pavement Marking (Preformed Thermoplastic) 48 LF 20.00 $960.00 20 Right Turn Arrow Symbol (Preformed Thermoplastic) 1 EA 300.00 $300.00 21 Permanent Signage 1 LS 8,000.00 $8,000.00 22 Fence 40 LF 100.00 $4,000.00 23 15" Class Ill Reinforced Concrete Pipe Culvert 344 LF 60.00 $3,000.00 24 18" Class Il l Reinforced Concrete Pipe Culvert 320 LF 75.00 $6,750.00 25 24" Class Il l Reinforced Concrete Pipe Culvert 10 LF 85.00 $850.00 26 Precast Concrete Manhole - 60 in. 6 EA 4,000.00 $24,000.00 27 Type A Concrete Curb Inlet 4' x 3' 14 EA 3,250.00 $45,500.00 28 Connect to Existing Storm Sewer 9 EA 1,500.00 $13,500.00 29 Seeding and Mulch 0.5 AC 10,000.00 $5,000.00 30 Silt Fencing 230 LF 4.00 $920.00 31 Inlet Protection 32 EA 120.00 $3,840.00 32 Temporary Traffic Control 1 LS 15,000.00 $15,000.00 33 Subgrade Stabilization 478 TON 15.00 $7,170.00 Roadway Subtotal $974,843.75 MSE Wall 34 Concrete and Masonry Protection System (-$1.50/SF of MSE Walls) 1 LS 20,000.00 $20,000.00 35 Sacrificial Graffiti Protection System (--$1.50/SF of MSE Walls) 1 LS 20,000.00 $20,000.00 36 Mechanically Stabilized Earth Wall Systems (At East End) 9,070 SF 80.00 $725,600.00 37 Mechanically Stabilized Earth Wall Systems (At West End) 4,375 SF 80.00 $350,000.00 MSE Wall Subtotal $1,115,600.00 W:\Protj\16000\76197\16197.210\Documents\Cost Estimates\16197.210 - Combined Estimate 9-20-2021 - reformatted.xlsm Page 1 of 2 Item No. Description p Quantity Unit Engineer's Estimate Unit Price Total Cost Bridge - Typical 38 Class 1 Excavation 750 CY 60.00 $45,000.00 39 Class 2 Excavation 1,570 CY 80.00 $125,600.00 40 Galvanized Structural Steel Piles (12 in.) 8,621 LF 75.00 $646,575.00 41 Pile Point Reinforcement 193 EA 200.00 $38,600.00 42 Class B Concrete (Substructure) 1,307 CY 825.00 $1,078,275.00 43 Slab on Concrete NU -Girder 2,779 SY 340.00 $944,860.00 44 Corral Curb 1,247 LF 100.00 $124,700.00 45 NU 35, Prestressed Concrete NU -Girder 1,075 LF 250.00 $268,750.00 46 NU 43, Prestressed Concrete NU -Girder 1,842 LF 260.00 $478,920.00 47 Reinforcing Steel (Bridges) 134,110 LB 1.30 $174,343.00 48 Reinforcing Steel (Epoxy Coated) 25,290 LB 1.50 $37,935.00 49 Protective Coating - Concrete Bents and Piers (Epoxy) 1 LS 9,600.00 $9,600.00 50 Slab Drain 16 EA 370.00 $5,920.00 51 Expansion Device (Flat Plate) 42 LF 1,200.00 $50,400.00 52 Vertical Drain at End Bents 2 EA 2,000.00 $4,000.00 53 Plain Neoprene Bearing Pad 5 EA 220.00 $1,100.00 54 Laminated Neoprene Bearing Pad 20 EA 260.00 $5,200.00 55 Laminated Neoprene Bearing Pad (Tapered) 35 EA 400.00 $14,000.00 56 Type N PTFE Bearing (At Expansion Joint) 10 EA 3,000.00 $30,000.00 57 Pipe Pile Spacers 14 EA 1,000.00 $14,000.00 Bridge - Non -typical 58 Removal of Miscellaneous ACM (Non -Friable) 0 SF 160.00 $0.00 59 Removal of Bridges (2180003) (-$18/sf for all but the west abutment) 1 LS 630,000.00 $630,000.00 60 Removal of Bridges (2180003) (west vertical wall abutment) 1 LS 50,000.00 $50,000.00 61 Bridge Approach Slab (Minor) 189 SY 160.00 $30,240.00 62 (22 in.) Decorative Railing (Structures) 1,095 LF 125.00 $136,875.00 63 (88 in.) Decorative Railing (Structures) (In span over RR) 152 LF 250.00 $38,000.00 64 Sidewalk (Bridges) 7,102 SF 25.00 $177,550.00 65 Form Liners (Corral Curb) 300 SY 115.00 $34,500.00 66 Conduit System on Structure (-$22/LF) 1 LS 41,000.00 $41,000.00 67 Sacrificial Graffiti Protection System (-$1.50/SF of collision wall) 1 LS 800.00 $800.00 68 Decorative Lighting 14 EA 5,000.00 $70,000.00 Bridge Subtotal $5,306,743.00 Contingency 10% $739,718.68 Total Construction Cost $8,136,905.43 1 Engineering (assumes survey by City) 12% $976,428.65 Construction Administration (assumed provided by City) Construction Survey/Staking (assumed provided by City) Right -of -Way (unknown) Utility Relocations (unknown) Total Project Cost $9,113,334.08 At the time this estimate was prepared, utility relocation and right of way acquisition needs are unknown and have been omitted from the project cost estimate. This project cost opinion was prepared using bid tabulation information available at the time of preparation and is prepared in good faith using engineers judgment and experience. The engineer makes no guarantee as to the actual costs for construction. WAProk16000116197116197.2101Documents1Cost Estimates116197.210 - Combined Estimate 9-20-2021 - reformatted.xism Page 2 of 2 Jefferson City Public Works and Planning Committee May 12,2022 Amendments to Chapters 8 & 13 Building Construction & Maintenance Codes Included items: 1. Council Bill Summary 2. Proposed Council Bills: a. 2017 Electric Code & Amendments b. 2018 Plumbing Code & Amendments c. 2018 Mechanical & Fuel Gas Codes & Amendments d. 2018 Energy Code & Amendments e. 2018 Building, Residential, Existing Building & Swimming Pool and Spa Codes & Amendments f. 2018 Property Maintenance Code & Amendments g. 2018 Fire Code & Amendments BILL SUMMARY BILL NO: _________ _ SPONSOR: ______________________________ __ SUBJECT: Amending Chapters 8 and 13 of City Code. pertaining to updating the construction and fire prevention codes from the 2015 editions to the 2018 editions from the International Code Council. DATEINTRODUCED:~M=a~v~1=2~,2=0=2=2 ______________________________ __ DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR: ________________________________ _ CITY ADMINISTRATOR: ____________________________________ _ Staff Recommendation: Approve Summary: These proposed bills are modifications to City Code to adopt updated versions of various construction and fire prevention codes. Overall, ten (1 0) different International Code Council (ICC) model codes and the 2017 NFPA National Electric Code are recommended to be adopted by reference. Each code addresses unique aspects of building construction, maintenance and use. Origin of Request: Building Regulations Division Department Responsible: Department of Planning and Protective Services Person Responsible: Sonny Sanders/Matthew Kreyling Background Information: In general, building codes provide minimum construction standards to protect the health, safety and welfare of the users of the structures. Since new materials and techniques are being developed, building codes are constantly being reviewed and modified by the construction industry. Another source of code updates are caused by disasters or building failures with loss of life. To assist in this industry update, the International Code Council (ICC) is a leading building code organization. Proposed updates are reviewed and approved by its members. These updates are published every three (3) years and are then made available for adoption by communities. The City of Jefferson has adopted versions of model building codes since May of 1935 to help protect its citizens. The last building code adoption was the 2015 edition in August of 2017. Since the City Council has recognized the importance of updating building codes, it passed a resolution (RS 2019-17) in February 2019 to form an Ad Hoc Steering Committee (referred to as the "Committee") and its several sub-committees to review and make recommendations on the new code editions. (Continued on next page) Fiscal Information: No fiscal impact. Page 1 of 3 The Committee members were appointed by the City Council and are comprised of seven (7) individuals. The Committee first met in February of 2020 and formed three (3) technical subcommittees to review the various codes. The committee appointed members from itself to chairs and vice chairs of the subcommittees for coordination. In all, sixteen (16) volunteers from the community reviewed the codes and included : • Eight (8) design professionals (architects and engineers) • Five (5) contractors • Two (2) members related to construction (material suppliers, fire inspector) • One (1) owner/developers The Committee members are: Chris Yarnell-Chair Nick Borgmeyer Bruce Dawson Jim Dove The technical sub-committee members a re: Wes Doerhoff-Vice-Chair Nick Peckham Holly Stitt Building, Existing Building, Property Maintenance, and Fire Codes: Wes Doerhoff-Chair Nick Borgmeyer Holly Stitt Brian Connell Emad Faddoul Fuel Gas, Energy Conservation, and Mechanical Codes: Nick Peckham -Chair Jim Dove Holly Stitt Fred Malicoat Bret Stieferman Jeremy Wilhelm Residential , Swimming Pool & Spa, and Wildland Urban Interface Codes: Chris Yarnell-Chair Bruce Dawson Holly Stitt Mike Crocker Emad Faddoul Primary City staff that attended meetings: Dean Heitmeyer Bob Scruggs Charles Skornia Jason Turner, Division Chief-JCFD Matthew Kreyling, Building Official -PPS Brian Allen , Building Inspector -PPS Besides committee members listed above, technical experts in various areas were invited to meetings to share their professional opinions on topics. In addition, a web page was created on the City of Jefferson's web site for communicating progress on the building code review. The page is located at: https ://www.jeffersoncitymo .gov/governmentlbuild ing regulations/2018 building code review .php Page 2 of 3 The final building code recommendation from the Committee was made on March 24 , 2022. This was after more than 33 public meetings to review the codes in detail. The fina l recommendation was to adopt the following codes with amendments : 1. NFPA 70 National Electric Code, 2017 Edition * 2. 20181nternational Plumbing Code* 3. 20181nternational Mechanical Code * 4 . 2018 International Fuel Gas Code * 5. 2018 International Energy Conservation Code 6. 2018 International Building Code * 7. 2018 International Residential Code * 8. 2018 International Existing Building Code * 9. 2018 International Swimming Pool and Spa Code * 10. 20181nternational Property Maintenance Code * 11 . 2018 International Fire Code * * Previous versions of this model code have been adopted. Please note that items number 1 & 2 on this list were recommended by the City's Electrical and Plumbing licensing boards. By City Ordinance, these codes are reviewed annually by the standing board for any revision or updating to newer editions. The code review recommendation to the City Council includes adoption of an additional model code, specifically the Energy Conservation Code. While the Residential Code contains insulation requirements for the construction of single-family and two-family (duplex) buildings, the Building Code relies on the requirements of the Energy Conservation Code for minimum standards in building equipment energy usage and exterior envelope insulation standards . Adopting th is code directly into City Code defines enforcement of the entire specialized code. Otherwise, this code would be limited to a small portion of its reference in other codes . The adoption of this code will fill in a technical gap within the City's adoption of construction codes . During review of the 2018 code editions , the main concern was regarding a retroactive requirement to install automatic sprinkler systems in banquet halls, nightclubs, restaurants, cafeterias, taverns and bars that met specific criteria. Ultimately, the committee has recommended an amendment to delete this new requirement. The increase in safety brought about by such a broad application of a requirement that would be triggered by the continuation of an otherwise legal use was seen as onerous for bui lding owners and tenants. The codes have and continue to allow for and require upgrades to safety systems when a building owner or tenant initiates a construction project of their own accord. Minutes of the public meetings conducted are online under "Ad Hoc Steering Committee on Building Construction Codes-2018 " meeting at: https:/ /portal.laserfiche. com/Portal/Browse . aspx?id=600573&repo=r -49e9e584 Page 3 of 3 BILL NO.---------------- SPONSORED BY COUNCILMAN _______ _ ORDINANCE NO.------------- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, AMENDING THE CITY CODE, CHAPTER 8, SECTION 8-2 AND SECTION 8-3 BY REPLACING THE ADOPTION OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE 2014 AND AMENDMENTS TO THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE 2014 BY THE ADOPTION OF NFPA 70, NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE, 2017 EDITION. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, AS FOLLOWS: Section1. The Code of the City of Jefferson, Chapter 8 (Buildings and Building Regulations), Section 8-2 (Adoption of National Electrical Code 2014), is hereby deleted and the following is added in lieu thereof: Sec. 8-2. Adoption of NFP A 7!!s National Electrical Code, 2017 Edition "NFPA 7!!s National Electrical Code, 2017 Edition", published !!:Y. the National Fire Protection Association, including Informative Annex !! "Administration and Enforcement," ~ hereby adopted and incorporated herein !!:Y. reference, as the Electrical Code of the City of Jefferson., with the additions, insertions, deletions and changes contained within this Chapter. (Ord. No. 10671, § 18, 6-16-86; Ord. No. I 1245, § I, 6-19-89; Ord. No. I 1579, § 18, 5-20-91; Ord. No. 12751, § 2, 5-18-98; Ord. 13579, § 1, 7-21-2003; Ord. 14107, § 1, 10-16-2006; Ord. 14485, § 1, 3-2-2009; Ord. No. 15702, § 1 8-21-2017) Cross reference--Ordinances not affected by Code generally,§ 1-3. Section 2. The Code of the City of Jefferson, Chapter 8 (Buildings and Building Regulations), Section 8-3 (Amendments to National Electrical Code 2014), is hereby deleted and the following is added in lieu thereof: Sec. 8-3. Amendments to NFP A 7!!s National Electrical Code, 2017 Edition The following additions, insertions, deletions and changes m made to the National Fire Protection Association (NFP A) 7!!s National Electrical Code, 2017 Edition, including Informative Annex H "Administration and Enforcement," otherwise referred to herein as the Electrical Code of the City of Jefferson: Delete Section 210.12, ARC Fault Circuit Interrupter Protection: in its entirety. Delete Sections 80.15 thru 80.35 and insert in its place the following: 80.15. Board of Electrical Examiners and Review: Division! of Article XII, Chapter L. establishes!!. Bill-Page 1 Editor's note: Deleted language shown tffils. Added language shown thus. board of electrical examiners and review with attendant duties and powers. Whenever reference !! made to the "Board" in Section 8-3 of ct;;j}ter J! of the Code of the City of Jefferson, Missouri, reference!§. to the Board of Electrical Examiners and Review. 80.16. Duties of the Board: The Board shall act !!.!! grievances ~ an applicant for !!! electrical permit, the holder of !!! electrical permit, !!! the owner and/or agent of ! building or structure wherein electrical work !§. to be installed. Such referral shall be !!! appeal from the decision of the Electrical Inspector, or his or her authorized agent !!! representative, refusing to grant ! modification of provisions of the Electrical Code governing the installation or materials to be used ~ the installation. Application for appeal will be received ~ the Director of Planning and Protective Services of the City of Jefferson, or his !!! her authorized representative, when !! !! alleged that: 1.The true intent of the Electrical Code!!! the rules adopted thereunder has been incorrectly interpreted. 2.The provisions of the Electrical Code do not fully .!!.PP!Y:. At such time as the Board meets to act!!.!! such !!! .!!.PP!<l!.b if!!.!!£ of the members of said Board has ! financial !!! material interest in the .!!.PP!<l!.b that member shall not have ! vote. A simple majority of those members voting shall constitute ! qualified decision. In the event the voting members of the Board are evenly divided, the decision of the Electrical Inspector shall be affirmed. The Board may review the Electrical Code and shall transmit to the City Council !!!!Y and all recommendations and/or changes that~ necessary to update the Electrical Code. 80.17. Meetings of the Board: The Board shall meet at such intervals !!§.may be necessary for the proper performance of its duties, and upon call of the Board Chair, but in !!!!Y case not less than twice! year. Minutes of all meetings will be kept on file and submitted to the City Council. 80.18. Electrical Inspector: The administration and enforcement of the Electrical Code shall be the responsibility of the Director of Planning and Protective Services !!! his !!! her designated representative, the Electrical Inspector, who !§. hereby authorized to take such action as may be necessary to enforce this section. 80.19. Qualifications of Electrical Inspector: The Electrical Inspector shall be of good moral character and be physically able to £.!!.!.IT out all of the provisions of the Electrical Code. The Electrical Inspector shall have 4,000 or ~ hours experience as ! journeyman in the trade. The Electrical Inspector shall be ! certified journeyman electrician, but shall not be actively engaged in the electrical business !!! associated with .!!.!!Y person, firm or corporation engaged in the electrical business. The Electrical Inspector shall obtain ! master electrician license and all applicable International Code Council electrical certificates within two ill years of being appointed ~the City Administrator. 80.20. Appointment of the Electrical Inspector. The Electrical Inspector shall be appointed ~ the City Administrator. 80.21. Duties of the Electrical Inspector. It shall be the duty of the Electrical Inspector to enforce the provisions of the Electrical Code and to make all inspections that ~ required thereunder, and to issue all permits, collect all fees and keep all records required under this section. The Electrical Inspector shall also have the duty to perform all tasks and services delegated to him ~ other City Code sections, the Mayor, or other supervisory personnel. 80.22. The Electrical Inspector shall issue permits for the performance of electrical work. Applications for such permits, describing the work to be done, shall be made ~ the person firm !!! corporation to perform the work!!.!! such forms ~ may be prescribed !!! approved ~ the Electrical Inspector. Permits must be taken out before !!!!Y work !§. stated. !f additional permits ~ required, Bill-Page 2 Editor's note: Deleted language shown tlms. Added language shown thus. they must be applied for before final inspection is made. 80.22.1. Inspections. The Electrical Inspector shall have the right, during all reasonable hours in which work ~ being performed under ! permit, to enter !!!Y building in the discharge of his or her duties .!!!: for the purpose of making an inspection or test new installations of electrical wiring. devices or materials contained therein. 80.22.2. Disconnection. The Electrical Inspector shall have the authority to cause all electrical current to be turned off and may cut .!!!: disconnect, in case emergency, !!!Y wires where such electrical current is dangerous to life .!!!: property or where said wires may interfere with the work of the fire department. 80.22.3. Certificates oflnspection and Approval. Upon the completion of the installation of the wiring and/ m: electrical equipment for which ! permit ~ required, !! shall be the !!!!tv of the person, firm or corporation installing the ~ to notify the Electrical Inspector who shall inspect the installation within twenty-four (24) hours of the time such notice ~ given (exclusive of Saturdays, Sundays and holidays), and if !! ~ found to be fully in compliance with this code and if !! does not constitute ! hazard to life and property, then upon payment of the proper fees n hereafter designated, the Electrical Inspector shall issue to such person, .!!!: firm m: corporation for delivery to the ~ of the premises ! Certificate of Inspection and Approval that authorizes connection to the electrical service and turning Q!! the current. When !!!Y part of! wiring installation ~ to be hidden from view !!Y, the permanent placement of parts of the building, the person, firm .!!!: corporation installing the wire shall notify the Electrical Inspector and such part of the wiring installation shall not be concealed until !! has been inspected and approved !!! the Electrical Inspector .!!!: until twenty four (24) hours (exclusive of Saturdays, Sundays and holidays) shall have elapsed from time of such notification, providing that on large installations where the concealment of parts of the installation proceeds continuously, the person, firm or corporation installing the wiring shall give the electrical Inspector due notice and inspection shall be made during the progress of the work. 80.22.4. Commercial Buildings Change of Occupancy, Procedure. The Electrical Inspector shall make ! thorough inspection m: re-inspection of the installation of any commercial building where ! change of occupancy takes place, of all electrical wiring, devices, and/ .!!!: materials and issue ! Certificate of Inspection and Approval to the~ occupant(s) authorizing connection to the electrical service and turning on of the current. When the installation of any such wiring. devices, and or materials ~ found to be unsafe or dangerous condition, the person, firm ru: corporation using ru: operating the ~ shall be notified and shall make necessary repairs .!!!: changes required to place such wiring, devices, and or materials in ! safe condition and they shall have such work completed within fifteen @ days m: any longer period that may be prescribed in the notice of the Electrical Inspector. The Inspector ~ hereby empowered to disconnect or order the discontinuance of electrical service to such wiring, devices, and/ ru: materials until the installation of such wiring, devices and/ ru: materials has been made safe n directed!!! the Electrical Inspector. 80.22.5. Records. The Electrical Inspector shall keep complete records of all permits issued and inspections made and other official work performed under the terms of this section. Notices of violations shall: a.Be P!!! in writing; b.Include! statement of the reasons why!!~ being issued. c.AIIow ! reasonable (specified) period of time for the performance of any act !! requires. d.Be served upon the owner,.!!! the owner's agent,.!!! the occupant, n the~ may require; provided that such notice shall be deemed to be properly served upon such owner .!!! agent .!!!: upon such occupant !f! ~ thereof~ served personally; .!!! !f! ~ thereof ~ sent !!Y, Bill-Page 3 Editor's note: Deleted language shown tftt!s. Added language shown thus. registered mail to the last known address; or !f ! ~ thereof !! posted in ! conspicuous place in Q! about the structure affected n the notice. e.Such notice may contain .!!.!! outline of remedial action provisions of this code along with rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto. 80.22.6 Fees. The Electrical Inspector shall collect such fees for licenses, permits, certificates and inspection !!! may be prescribed n this Chapter. 80.23. Licenses. No person. firm Q! corporation shall engage in the business of electrical work in the City of Jefferson unless licensed as .!!.!! electrical contractor. The business of electrical work shall mean the supplying of labor and materials for the installation, alteration or repair of electrical systems. 80.23.1. Exemptions: No license Q! permit !! required for the performance of the following dwelling unit electrical work: a.Receptacle replacement (110 volt only). b.Single pole switch replacement c.Garbage disposals !P!!!g in only) d.Light fixtures (110 volt only) e.Ceiling fan replacement f.Furnace motor replacement g. Water heating element (electrical) replacement h.Smoke detector replacement i.Stove element replacement 80.24. The Board shall be empowered to aporove applicants for the following licenses. a.Electrical Contractor b.Master Electrician c.Journeyman Electrician d.Maintenance Electrician 80.25. A license shall be issued to approve applicants who meet the following requirements and P!V the prescribed fee. All examinations require ! minimum passing score of 75o/o. 80.25.1. Electrical Contractor a.Submit application to the Electrical Inspector stating name, email, address, telephone number and business~ b.Applicant must be ! licensed Jefferson City master electrician. c. The contractor shall provide! certificate of insurance coverage with their application !!! indicated below starting with the 2020 license renewal. The insurance shall be in effect while the contractor !! licensed. !! !! further made ! violation of this code to provide fraudulent information to the department. !.Workers' compensation coverage or an affidavit signed n the applicant attesting that the contractor is exempt. Biii-Page4 Editor's note: Deleted language shown tktis. Added language shown thus. 2.Minimum limits of Commercial General Liability insurance shall be $500,000 nru: occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage, with an annual aggregate of $500,000. 80.25.2. Master Electrician ~A} a.Submit application to the Electrical Inspector stating name, email, address and telephone number · b.Provide documentation of 4,000 hours of active employment !! .!!. journeyman electrician !!! be registered with the State of Missouri !! .!!. professional engineer !!! architect and be actively engaged in the business of electrical contracting. All documentation of hours must be under the letter head of the electrical contractor(s) that the applicant worked for !! .!!. journeyman electrician. c.Provide record of 8,000 hours !! an apprentice electrician. All documentation must be submitted under the letter head of the electrical contractor(s) under which the applicant worked as an apprentice electrician. · d.Successfully complete examination required .In: the Board of Electrical Examiners. An applicant must provide proof that they meet the above requirements prior to taking the examination. 80.25.3. Journevman Electrician ~ ID a.Submit application to the Electrical Inspector stating name, email. address and telephone number. b.Provide documentation of 8,000 hours of employment as an apprentice electrician. All documentation must be under letter head of the electrical contractor(s) that the applicant worked ·for as !!! apprentice electrician. Successful completion of an electrical ~ at .!!. trade school may be considered for credit towards the 8,000 hour requirement. c.Successfully complete examination required .In: the Board of Electrical Examiners. An applicant must provide documentation that they met the above requirements prior to taking the examination. 80.25.4. Apprentice Electrician. Submit application stating name, email, address and phone number, and name of contractor where they are currently employed. 80.25.5. Maintenance Electrician: ~ ID a.Submit application stating, name, email, address and phone number. b.Successfully complete examination required .In: the Board of Electrical Examiners. 80.26. Scope of Work Authorized: 80.26.1. Electrical Contractor shall be authorized to engage in the business of supplying material and labor for the installation, alteration or repair of electrical systems. 80.26.2 Master Electrician shall be authorized to do all ~ of electrical work !! !!! electrical contractor !!! while employed .In: !!! electrical contractor licensed .In: the City of Jefferson. A Master Electrician who also holds ~ !!! ~ additional trade licenses with the City of Jefferson may supervise no ~than two ill apprentices in !!!Y one ill trade at any ~ill permitted h!!! site. 80.26.3 Journeyman Electrician shall be authorized to do all ~ of electrical work while employed .In: !!! electrical contractor licensed .In: the City of Jefferson. A Journeyman Electrician who also holds ~ !!! ~ additional trade licenses with the City of Jefferson may supervise no more than Bill-Page 5 Editor's note: Deleted language shown tftt!s. Added language shown thus. two ill apprentices in any one ill trade at !!!Y ~ill permitted .i!!h site. 80.26.4 Apprentice Electrician shall be authorized to do electrical work while employed ~ !!!. electrical contractor and under the direct supervision of ! licensed journeyman. The ratio of apprentice to journeyman shall be two a} apprentices to ~ill journeyman. Apprentices may only obtain one ill trade license w calendar year. 80.26.5 Maintenance Electrician shall be qualified to maintain industrial electrical installations. Any maintenance shall be confined to the repair and relocation of existing branch circuits. faxture, apparatus .!!! equipment connected to hereto. and shall be confmed to premises .!!! building owned, occupied .!!! otherwise controlled ~ the industrial. firm. The maintenance electrician shall not be authorized to install, alter,.!!! replace service equipment or feeder to any service equipment. 80.27. Fees for License 80.27.1 Electrical Contractor: A fee !§. stated in Appendix X w calendar year, (Januarv ! thru December 31). The fee shall not be pro-rated. 80.27.2 Master Electrician: A fee!§. stated in Appendix Y. The license i! renewable every three years (starting in July of2021 and then triennially afterwards) for the fee stated in Appendix Y. 80.27.3 Journeyman Electrician: A fee as stated in Appendix Y. The license i! renewable every three years (starting in July of2021 and then triennially afterwards) for the fee stated in Appendix Y. 80.27.4 Apprentice Electrician: A fee as stated in Appendix X w calendar year (January ! thru December 31). The fee shall not be pro-rated. 80.27.5 Maintenance Electrician: A fee !§.stated in Appendix Y. The license i! renewable every three years (starting in July of2021 and then triennially afterwards) for the fee stated in Appendix Y. 80.28 Electrical ~Work: All electrical work related to the installation of signs shall be performed ~ ! licensed electrician with the exception of electrical wiring that i! !!!. integral part of the con~truction of the sign. 80.29 Licenses, Suspension .!!! Revocation. The Board may suspend .!!! revoke the license of !!!Y apprentice, journeyman, maintenance, .!!! contractor electrician when charges are made against them ~ the Electrical Inspector, and the Board finds that the person charged i! incompetent or had willfully violated the provisions of this code. Before !!!Y action i! taken ~ the Board, the person charged shall be given at least ten am days' notice of the time and place of! formal hearing on said charges and the person charged shall be apprised of the nature of the charges. The person charged shall be given the opportunity to appear. in person .!!! with an attorney of his or her choice, in order that they be heard, and they shall have the burden of showing ~ why the license should not be suspended or revoked. The Board shall render its decision within ! reasonable time after the hearing. The decision shall be final. No appeal shall be allowed therefrom. The decision of the Board may permit the person charged to continue their trade and dismiss the charge; or the Board may suspend the license of the person charged for such period !§. the Board deems proper under all of the facts and circumstances; .!!! the Board may permanently revoke the license of the person charged. A person whose license has been revoked ~ the Board shall not be permitted to re-apply for ! license for! period of one ill year. and must successfully pass any required examination for the license. 80.30. Non-Assignment of License: No person who has obtained an electrician's license shall allow his .!!! her ~ to be used ~ another person either for the purpose of obtaining permits, .!!! for doing business or work under the license. 80.31. Permits 80.31.1. A permit shall be required in each of the following cases: Bill-PageS Editor's note: Deleted language shown th$. Added language shown thus. l.For all electrical wiring in structures not previously wired; 2.For all rewiring where additional circuits from the panel lli required and/or the service entrance panel .!§ being replaced (this shall not include the replacement of individual outlets or switches); 3.For all extensions of or additions to existing wiring for supplying power loads such !!! furnaces, air conditioners and laundry appliances; 4.For connecting hot !!.!!:2 hot water, steam !!.!: electrical heating plants whether ~ or old installations; and, 5.For installation and additions to sound, audio/visual and/or communication equipment. 80.31.2. No permit shall be issued until an application.!§ filed in writing with the Electrical Inspector and fees have been paid. Information supplied in the application shall include the following. l.Location of work to be done: 2.Name and address of property owner: 3.Name and address of person!!.!: firm in charge of the work: 4.A brief description of the work to be done: 5.Capacity (amperes) of the entrance panel to be installed ill !!!!Y1i 6.Number of circuits to be installed; 7.KW rating of all appliances and furnaces and the square footage of the residence; 8.New ~ and two family residential units must have ! complete load calculations with services sized to allow for 10% spare capacity; 9.AII ~ commercial and multifamily units must have complete electrical plans including service riser with load calculations and circuitry designations. Where required~ State law, plans must be sealed ~! licensed design professional registered in the State of Missouri. 80.32. Homeowner Permits: A permit may be issued to ! qualified person (qualification shall be determined ~ ! test of basic knowledge of electrical principles) to do work in ! single family dwelling used exclusively for their living purposes, including the usual accessory buildings and quarters in connection with such buildings, provided that the person .!§ !!. bona fide owner of such dwelling and shall occupy said dwelling for ~ ill calendar year after date of approved final inspection of work covered ~ the permit. Owner shall personally purchase all materials and perform all labor in connection therewith, and that the applicant shall file !!.!!. affidavit certifying that these conditions m correct before the issuance of the permit. Work performed under !!.!!Y permit shall be subject to all applicable regulatory provisions of this code. 80.33. Permit Fee Schedule: The fees for building construction permits shall be set in Chapter ~ Appendix Y of the City Code. 80.34. Penalty Clause. Fee for penalty for failure to obtain !!. building permit. Where work for which ! permit.!§ required~ this Code .!§started prior to obtaining said permit, the fees specified in Appendix X of the Code of the City of Jefferson shall be doubled. Should !!.!!Y person, firm or corporation commit ! second offense ~ starting work without permit after ~ doing on !!. previous occasion, he shaiiJ!!Y three times the customary fee in order to obtain the necessary permit. Any offense shall subject the offender to prosecution under section 80.34.1. In the event !!.!!Y person Bill-Page 7 Editor's note: Deleted language shown tlms. Added language shown thus. firm m: corporation fails to obtain the necessary permit(s) within ~ days after being notified in writing to do §!! ~ the building official, he shall P!:Y in addition to the usual fee m: increased penalty .!!.§ provided above the §!!!!! of $25.00 for each !!!!Y in ~ of the aforesaid ~ days that transpire prior to his m: her obtaining the necessary permit. The payment of!!.!!!. m: several of the above stated penalty fees shall not relieve !!.!!!. person, firm or corporation from fully complying with the requirements of this code in the execution of the work !!!!: from any other penalties prescribed herein, m: in the City Code. 80.34.1 Violation Penalties Any person who shall violate ! provision of this Code m: shall fail to comply with any of the requirements thereof m: who shall erect, construct, alter m: repair! building or structure in violation of!!! approved plan m: directive of the building official, or of! permit m: certificate issued under the provisions of this code. shall be punished~! fine.!!.§ set forth in Section 1-13 of the City Code. Each day that! violation continues shall be deemed a separate offense. 80.35. Standards of Work. No Certificate of Inspection and Approval shall be issued unless the electric light, power and heating installations are in strict conformity with the provisions of this code and unless they !!!l. in conformity with the approved methods of construction for safety to life and property and unless the proper fees are paid as herein designated. The regulations as laid down in the Electrical Code shall !PP!I to installations made under the provisions of this code. 80.36. Disapproval of Work, Procedure. When the Electrical Inspector shall reject all m: part of!!.!!!. electrical installation, the ~ thereof may. within five ill days after receipt of written notice thereof from the Electrical Inspector, file ! petition in writing for ! review of said action with the Board upon receipt of which and after giving notice to all of the interested parties, the Board shall proceed to determine at ! hearing at which all interested parties may be present in person and with !!! attorney, if the said electrical installation does comply with the provisions of this code. The Board shall render its decision in writing within three Ql days. Said decision shall be final and !!!!:. appealable. When the action or decision of the Electrical Inspector !! being reviewed and in the event the members of the Board !!!l. evenly divided !!!! the issue before them, the decision of the Inspector shall be deemed affirmed. It upon final inspection, the installation i! not found to be fully in compliance with this code, the Electrical Inspector shall at once forward to the person, firm or corporation installing the wiring ! written notice stating the defects which have been found to exist. Upon bringing the installation into compliance, the grantee of the permit shall notify ~ Electrical Inspector. 80.37. Disclaimer Clause: This code shall not be construed to relieve from or lessen the responsibility m: liability of any P!!tv owning, operating, controlling or installing any electrical wiring and electrical systems for damage caused~!!.!!!. defect therein. Nor shall the City of Jefferson, m:!!.!!!. of its inspectors, agents, m: employees. including its Electrical Inspector, be held .!!.§assuming !!.!!!. such liability ~ reason of the inspection authorized herein or certificate of approval issued .!!.§ herein provided. 80.38. Validity: The CitY Council hereby declares that, should any section, paragraph, sentence, m: word of this section or of the code hereby adopted be declared for any ~ to be invalid, !! i! the intent of the City Council that !! would have passed all other portions of this section independent of the elimination here from of any such portion .!!.§may be declared invalid. (Ord. No. 11245, § 2, 6-19-89; Ord. No. 11579, §§ 1-15, 5-20-91; Ord. No. 12751, § 3, 5-18-98; Ord. No. 13007, § 1, 12-20-99; Ord. 13579, § 2, 7-21-2003; Ord. 14107, § 1, 10-16-2006; Ord. 14485, § 2, 3-2-2009; Ord. No. 15486, § 1, 2-1-2016; Ord. No. 11905, § 9, 5-17-93; Ord. 14485, § 2, 3-2-2009; Ord. No. 12810, § 1, 9-8-98; Ord. 14485, § 2, 3-2-2009; Ord. No. 15128, § 1, 6-17-2013; Ord. No. 15703, § 2, 8-21-2017; Ord. No. 15916, § 1, 5-20-2019) Bill-Page 8 Editor's note: Deleted language shown tlms. Added language shown thus. Section 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from 60 (sixty) calendar days after the date of its passage and approval. Passed: ___________ _ Approved: __________ _ Presiding Officer · Mayor Carrie Tergin ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk City Counselor Bill-Page 9 Editor's note: Deleted language shown tffits. Added language shown thus. BILL NO.------- SPONSORED BY COUNCILMAN-------- ORDINANCE NO. ------------- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, AMENDING THE CITY CODE, CHAPTER 8, SECTION 8-4 AND SECTION 8-5 BY REPLACING THE ADOPTION OF THE INTERNATIONAL PLUMBING CODE 2015 AND AMENDMENTS TO THE INTERNATIONAL PLUMBING CODE 2015 BY ADOPTION OF THE 2018 INTERNATIONAL PLUMBING CODE. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, AS FOLLOWS: Section1. The City Code, Chapter 8 (Buildings and Building Regulations), Section 8-4 (Adoption of the 2015 International Plumbing Code), is hereby deleted and the following is added in lieu thereof: Sec. 8-4. Adoption of the 2018 International Plumbing Code The 2018 International Plumbing Code published~ the International Code Council, Inc.!§. hereby adopted and incorporated herein ~ reference as the Plumbing Code of the City of Jefferson, with the additions, insertions, deletions and changes contained in this chapter. (Ord. No. 9I42, 7-I7-78; Ord. No. 10398, 84, 4-I-85; Ord. No. 11202:I, 4-I7-89; Ord. No. I2750, 5-I8- 98; Ord. 13578, §I, 7-2I-2003; Ord. 14106, § 1, IO-I6-2006; Ord. 14484, § 1, 3-2-2009; Ord. No. 15704, §I, 8-21-2017) Section 2. The City Code, Chapter 8 (Buildings and Building Regulations), Section 8-5 (Amendments to the 2015 International Plumbing Code}, is hereby deleted and the following is added in lieu thereof: Sec. 8-5. Amendments to the 2018 International Plumbing Code The following addition, insertions, deletion and changes in the 2018 International Plumbing Code and contained in this chapter shall be~ set out below: Section 101.1: Insert the words "City of Jefferson" as the .!!.!!.!!!!l. of the jurisdiction. Section 103: Department of Plumbing Inspection Delete Section 103.1, 103.2, and 103.3 and insert in their place: 103.1 General: The department of plumbing inspection known as the Department of Planning and Protective Services !§. hereby continued and the executive official in charge thereof shall be known ~ the Director of Planning and Protective Services. Wherever the words "code official" appear in this code, !! shall !!!.£!!.!!. the Director of Planning and Protective Services Q! his Q! her designee, such designee to be also known as the "Plumbing Inspector." Bill-Page 1 Editor's note: Deleted language shown tffits. Added language shown thus. 103.1.1 Qualifications of Plumbing Inspector: The Plumbing Inspector shall be of good moral character and be physically able to carry out all the provisions of the Plumbing Code. The Plumbing Inspector shall have 4,000 or~ hours experience as !! licensed journeyman in the trade. The Plumbing Inspector shall be !! City of Jefferson licensed journeyman plumber, but shall not be actively engaged in the plumbing business, !!.!!.!: associated with the operation of !!!!Y person, firm or corporation engaged in the plumbing business in Jefferson City. The Plumbing Inspector shall obtain !! Master Plumber license and all applicable International Code Council plumbing certificates within two ill years of being appointed hi the City Administrator. 103.2 Appointment: The Plumbing Inspector shall be appointed hi the City Administrator. 103.3 Deputies: The Director of Planning and Protective Services shall recommend to the City Administrator the employment of plumbing inspectors and other employees in sufficient numbers to~ enforcement of the Plumbing Code. Section 106.1: Add the following: 106.1.3 Permit Application: Application for permits for plumbing work shall be made Q!! forms provided hi the City Administrator. 106.1.4 Permits: Plumbing permits shall only be issued to licensed plumbing contractors and approved qualified home owners. 106.1.5 Homeowner Permits: A permit may be issued to !! qualified person (qualification shall be determined hi !! test of basic knowledge of plumbing principles) to do work in !! single family dwelling used exclusively for their living purposes, including the usual accessory buildings and quarters in connection with such buildings, provided that the person ~ !! bona fide owner of such dwelling and shall occupy said dwelling for one ill calendar year after date of approved final inspection of work covered hi the permit. Owner shall personally purchase all materials and perform all labor in connection therewith, and that the applicant shall file !!.!! affidavit certifying that these conditions ~ correct before the issuance of the permit. Work performed under !!!!Y permit shall be subject to all applicable regulatory provisions of this Code. Section 106.2: Add the following items to exempt work: 3.a)Water faucet repair/replacement b)Toilet tank fixtures repair/replacement c)Bathroom stool replacement d)Bathroom/kitchen drains unclogging Section 106.6.1: Replace this section with the following: Where work for which !! permit ~ required hi this Code ~ started prior to obtaining said permit, the fees specified in Appendix Y of the Code of the City of Jefferson shall be doubled. Should any person, firm or corporation commit !! second offense hi starting work without permit after so doing on !! previous occasion, he or she shall lli!.Y three times the customary fee in order to obtain the necessary permit. Any offense shall subject the offender to prosecution under section 108.4. In the event !!.!!Y person, firm Q! corporation fails to obtain the necessary permit(s) within ~ days after being notified in writing to do §.!!. hi the Building Official, he Q! she shall lli!.Y in addition to the usual fee Q! increased penalty .!!§. provided above the sum of $25.00 for each calendar ill in excess of the aforesaid~ days that transpire prior to his or her obtaining the necessary permit. The payment of !!!!Y or several of the above stated ~ fees shall not relieve !!!!Y person, firm or corporation from fully Bill-Page 2 Editor's note: peleted language shown tffits. Added language shown thus. complying with the requirements of this code in the execution of the work !!.Q! from !!!!Y. other penalties prescribed herein, Q!: in the City Code. Section 106.6.2: Insert the following: The fees for building construction permits shall be set in Appendix Y of the City Code for the City of Jefferson. Section 106.6.3 Fee refunds: Delete this section. Section 107.2: Add item .(11;. (4)Notice of inspection; it shall be the duty of the permit holder to contact the Department of Planning and Protective Services to arrange for each required inspection. The permit holder shall allow twenty-four (24) hours for the Plumbing Inspector Q!: Code Enforcement personnel to conduct required inspections during the City's normal working hours. Section 108.4: Replace this section with the following: Any person who shall violate .!! provision of this Code Q!: shall fail to comply with !!!!Y. of the requirements thereof Q!: who shall erect, construct, alter Q!: repair .!! building Q!: structure in violation of an approved plan Q!: directive of the Building Official, Q!: of .!! permit Q!: certificate issued under the provisions of this code, shall be punished !!I .!! fine !§. set forth in Section 1-13 of the City Code. Each !!.!!v. that.!! violation continues shall be deemed a separate offense. Section 108.5: Replace the last~ words with the following: " ... shall be subject to the penalties specified in Section 108.4." Section 109: Delete Sections 109.2 thru 109.7 and insert in their place the following: 109.2 Board of Plumbing Review and Examiners, Appointment and Term of Office: Division ~ of Article XIII, Chapter 1. establishes .!! board of plumbing examiners and review with attendant duties and powers. Whenever reference is made to the "Board" in Section 8-4 of Chapter ~ of the Code of the City of Jefferson, Missouri, reference ~ to the board of plumbing review and examiners. 109.2.1 Duties of the Board: The Board shall act Q!! grievances !!I !!!! applicant for .!! plumbing permit, the holder of plumbing permit, Q!: the ~and/or agent of! building Q!: structure wherein plumbing work~ to be installed. Such grievances shall be!!!! appeal of the decision of the Plumbing Inspector Q!: authorized agent Q!: representative. A grievance ~ refusing to grant .!! modification of provision of the Plumbing Code governing the installations or materials to be used. Applications for appeal will be submitted to the Director of Planning and Protective Services or !!!! authorized representative, when !! ~ claimed that: l.The true intent of the Plumbing Code or rules adopted thereunder has been incorrectly interpreted. 2.The provisions of the Plumbing Code do not fully !!.P.P!Y!. At such time !§. the Board meets to act Q!! such !!!! ~ if one of the members of said Board has.!! financial or material interest in the~ that member shall not vote. A simple majority of those voting shall constitute.!! qualified decision. In the event the voting members of the Board m evenly divided, the decision of the Plumbing Inspector shall be affirmed and the Board may review all examinations and the Plumbing Code and shall transmit to City Council !!!!Y. and all recommendations and/or changes necessary to update the Plumbing Code. Bill-Page 3 Editor's note: Deleted language shown lffils. Added language shown thus. 109.2.2 Meeting of the Board: The Board shall meet at such intervals !! may be necessary for the proper performances, upon call of the Board Chair. but not less than twice !!. year. Minutes of meetings will be kept!!!!. file for Council review. 109.2.3 Licenses: No person, firm !!! corporation shall install, repair, alter, !!! extend !!!Y plumbing system within the City of Jefferson unless licensed !! required in ·this code. Plumbing System includes the water ~ and distribution pipes; plumbing fiXtures and traps; soil, waste and vent oiwlL and· sanitary and storm ~ and building drains; in addition to their respective connections, devices and appurtenances within !!. structure !!! premises (five ~ feet outside of the building i! limited to 6" maximum diameter ~ for ~and building drains and 2" maximum diameter~ for water service) and their extension to the purveyors !!! other water ~ and the connection there to !!. point of disposal. 109.2.3.1 Application, Qualification and Fee for Licenses: Persons desiring !!. license shall complete and submit to the Plumbing Inspector !!!! application for license. (Applications lli obtained from the Department of Planning and Protective Services). 109.2.4 Plumbing.Contractor License: Persons desiring a Plumbing Contractor License shall be or employ full time !!. licensed Master Plumber and maintain !!. five thousand dollar ($5,000) surety bond. Said bond shall indemnify and keep harmless the City of Jefferson from all liability from any accidents or damages arising from negligence !!! unskillfulness in doing !!! protecting work or !!!!Y unfaithful or inadequate work done in pursuance of the Plumbing Business and that all street and right of way shall be restored to !!. condition acceptable to the City of Jefferson, Department of Public Works and shall maintain the acceptable condition for !!. period of one ill year thereafter. This license i! renewable annually for !!. fee !! stated in Appendix Y and shall be renewed during January of the following calendar year. Persons licensed as !!. Plumbing Contractor shall immediately notify the Plumbing Inspector, in writing, of !!!Y changes of name, address, phone number, or location of their plumbing business. 109.2.4.1 Plumbing Contractor Insurance: The contractor shall provide !!. certificate of insurance coverage with their application !! indicated below starting with 2020 license renewal. The insurance shall be in effect while the contractor is licensed. !! i! further made !!. violation of this code to provide fraudulent information to the department. a.Workers' compensation coverage !!! an affidavit signed ID: the applicant attesting that the contractor is exempt. b.Minimum limits of Commercial General Liability insurance shall be $500.000 JW: occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and propertv damage, with !!!! annual aggregate of $500,000. 109.2.5 Master Plumber Licenses: Persons desiring!!. license shall have been licensed as !!. journeyman with the City of Jefferson !!. minimum of two !D. years !!! provide proof of licensed journeyman and master experience acceptable to the Board, and ~ !!. minimum of 75% !!!!. the Thomson Pro-Metric Testing or Pearson VUE Master Plumber Examination !!! International Code Council International Plumbing Code and Fuel Gas Code. This license requires !!,fee !! stated in Appendix Y and i! renewable every three years (starting in July of 2022 and then triennially afterwards) for the fee stated in Appendix Y. A Master Plumber who also holds one ill or more additional trade licenses with the City of Jefferson may supervise no ~ than two m apprentices in any !!!!£ill trade at !!!Y !!!!£ill permitted .i!!!! site. 109.2.6 Journeyman Plumbing Licenses: Persons desiring !!,license shall have been licensed as !!!! apprentice with the City of Jefferson !!. minimum of four ffi years and shall have Biii-Page4 Editor's note: Deleted language shown thus. Added language shown thus. worked under the direct supervision of ! licensed journeyman or master plumber during these four ill years or show proof of four ill years plumbing experience acceptable to the Board and ~ ! minimum of 75% Q!! the Thomson Pro-Metric Testing or Pearson VUE Journeyman Plumbers Examination !!! International Code Council International Plumbing Code and Fuel Gas Code. This license requires ! fee ,!!! stated in Appendix X and !! renewable every three years (starting in July of2022 and then triennially afterwards) for the fee stated in Appendix Y. A Journeyman Plumber who also holds~ ill or more additional trade licenses with the City of Jefferson may supervise !!!!. more than two ill apprentices in any~ ill trade at any~ ill permitted .ll!J! site. 109.2.7 Apprentice Plumber License: Persons desiring ! license to work,!!!!!! apprentice plumber shall submit their name, address, phone number and social security number with the fee .!!! stated in Appendix .Y to the Plumbing Inspector. This license !! renewable each calendar year. Holder of !!! apprentice plumber license may only work under the direct supervision of ! licensed master !!! journeyman plumber. The ratio of apprentices to journeyman or master !§.two ill to one ill:. Apprentices may only obtain one ill trade license ~calendar year. 109.2.8 Licenses, Suspension!!! Revocation: The Board may suspend or revoke the license of any apprentice, journeyman, master !!! contractor plumber when charges m made against them !!v the Plumbing Inspector, and the Board finds the person charged!! incompetent!!! had willfully violated the provisions of this Code. Prior to Board action, the person charged shall be given at least ten !!!ll days' notice of the time and place of! formal hearing on said charges and the person charged shall be apprised of the charges. The person charged shall be given the opportunity to appear in person or with an attorney and shall have the burden of showing cause why the license should not be suspended or revoked. The Board shall render its decision within ! reasonable time after the hearing. The decision shall be final, !!!!. appeal shall be allowed. The Board may dismiss the charges, suspend the license for such period deemed proper or permanently revoke the charged person's license. A person whose license has been revoked !!v the Board shall not be permitted to re-apply for ! license for ! period of~ ill year, and must successfully pass any required examination for the license. 109.2.9 Assignment of Contractor Licenses: No person licensed as ! Plumbing Contractor shall allow this license to be used !!v others for the purpose of obtaining Plumbing Permits or knowingly allow non-licensed persons to do plumbing work. 109.3.0 Re-Examination: Persons who fail to pass the examination as prescribed may !PP!v for re-examination after the expiration of~ hundred twenty (120) days. Should applicant fail Q!! re-examination, the applicant may not re-apply for ! period of 120 days and shall be considered a new applicant. Section 305.4: Add the following line to this section: "The frost line in City of Jefferson, Missouri is 24 inches." Section 305.4.1: Replace this section with the following: 305.4.1 Sewer depth: Building sewers that connect to private sewage disposal systems shall be installed not less than 24 inches below finished grade at the point of septic tank connection. Building sewers shall be installed not less than 24 inches below finished grade. Section 312.6 Gravity Sewer Test: Delete this section. Section 312: Add these sections: 312.10.3 Testing of back flow prevention assemblies shall be conducted !!v City of Jefferson, Missouri licensed Journeyman or Master Plumber certified !!v the State of Missouri .!!! ! back flow prevention Bill-Page 5 Editor's note: Deleted language shown tffits. Added language shown thus. assembly tester. 312.10.4 Insoection and testing of back flow prevention assemblies: After the required test of!!. back flow prevention assembly at time of installation, the testing requirements shall become the responsibility of the water purveyor. Section 603 Water Service: Add this section: Section 603.1.1 Provide 14 gauge tracer wire !!! other approved utility location technology ~water service lines from the structure to the water main connection (RSMo 319.033.1). Tables 605.3 Water Service Pipe, 605.4 Water Distribution Pipe, and 605.5 Pipe Fitting: Replace these tables with the following tables: Material Brass Pipe Copper .!!!!. Copper Alloy Pipe Copper!!! Copper Alloy Tubing ~K!!!~ Cross-Linked Polyethylene ~ plastic tubing Plastic Pipe and Tubing Ductile Iron Water Pipe Polyethylene (PE) plastic ~ Polyethylene PE Plastic Tubhig Stainless steel~~ 304/304L} Stainless steel~~ 316/316L} Table 605.3 Water Service Pipe Standard ASTMB43 ASTM ,1! lli ASTM ,1! 302 ASTM ,1! ~ ASTM ,1! ~ ASTM)! 251; ASTM,I!447 ASTM ,E 876; ASTM .E 877; A WW A C904 CSA ,1! 137.5; SDR 2 4710 CTS AWWA~ 151; AWWA~ 115 ASTM .Q 2239, ASTM .Q 3035, A WW A C901; CSA B137.11 ASTM.Q2737; AWWAC901; CSA,I! 137.1 ASTM A 312, ASTM A 778 ASTM A 312, ASTM A 778 Bill-PageS Editor's note: Deleted language shown thas. Added language shown thus. Material Brass Pipe Copper or Copper Alloy Pipe Copper or Copper Alloy Tubing Table 605.4 Water Distribution Pipe Standard ASTM ]!43 ASTM J! lli ASTM J! 302 ASTM J! ~ ASTM J! ~ ~ .K, WK, k WL, M .!!! WM) ASTM]! 251; ASTM J! 447 Cross-Linked Polyethylene (PEX) ASTM .E 876, ASTM .E 877 CSA 8137.5 Plastic Tubing Cross-Linked ASTM .E 1281, ASTM .E 2262, CSA Polyethylene/aluminum/high-density 8137.10 -polyethylene (PEX-AL-HDPE) ~ Cross-Linked ASTM .E 1986 Polyethylene/aluminum/high-densi!Y polyethylene (PEX-AL-HDPE) Ductile iron ~ AWWA C151/A21.51, AWWA Cll5/A21.15 Polyethylene/aluminum/polyethylene ASTM .E 1282 (PE-AL-PE) composite~ Polyethylene of raised temperature ASTM ,E2769 (PE-RTI plastic tubing Polypropylene (PP) plastic~.!!! ASTM E 2389; CSA 8137.11 tubing Stainless steel~~ 304/304L) ASTM A 312; ASTM A 778 Stainless steel~~ 316/316L) ASTM A 312; ASTM A 778 Bill-Page 7 Editor's note: Deleted language shown tffits. Added language shown thus. Material Cast Iron Copper or Copper Alloy Cross-linked .polyethylene/aluminum/high-density polyethylene (PEX-AL-HDPE} Fittings for polyethylene (PEX} plastic tubing Fittings for polyethylene of raised temperature CPE-RTI plastic tubing Gray Iron and Ductile Iron Insert for polyethylene/aluminum/polyethylene (PE-AL-PE} and cross-linked polyethylene/ aluminum/cross-linked polyethylene ~EX-AL-PEX} Metal (brass insert fittings for polyethylene/aluminum/polyethylene (PE-AL-PE} and cross-linked polyethylene/ aluminum/cross-linked polyethylene (PEX-AL-PEX} Polyethylene (PE} Plastic Polypropylene (PP} plastic ~!!! tubing Table 605.5 Pipe Fittings Standard ASMEft16.4 ASME )!16.15; ASME R 16.18; ASME R 16.22; ASME R 16.26; ASME R 16.51; ASSE 1061, ASTM ,E 1476, ASTM ,E 1548 ASTM,E1986 ASSE 1061, ASTM ,E 877, ASTM ,E 1807, ASTM ,E 1960, ASTM f2080, ASTM ,E 2098, ASTM ,E 2159, ASTM ,E 2434, ASTM ,E 2735, CSA B137.5 ASTM ,E 1807, ASTM ,E 2098, ASTM ,E 2159, ASTM ,E 2735, ASTM ,E 2769 ASTM ,E 1476,ASTM ,E 1548, AWWA C110/A21.10; AWWA C153/A21.53 ASTM ,E 1974. ASTM ,E 1281. ASTM ,E 1282, CSA B137.9, CSA R 137.10M ASTM,E 1974 ASTM!! 2609 •. ASTM!! 2683, ASTM!! 3261, ASTM ,E 1055, CSA R 137.11 ASTM I 2389, CSA B137.11 Bill-Page 8 Editor's note: Deleted language shown tffits. Added language shown thus. Stainless steel ~ 304/304Ll ASTM A 312, ASTM A 778, ASTM .E 1476, ASTM .E 1548 . Stainless steel~ 316/316L) ASTM A 312, ASTM A 778, ASTM .E 1476, ASTM .E 1548 Steel ASTM.!! 16.9; ASME.!! 16.11,ASME B 16.28, ASTM .E 1476, ASTM .E 1548 Section 608.14.2.2: Add this section: 608.14.2.2 Back flow preventers installation height shall be~ ill foot minimum and five m feet maximum. Section 608.16.5; Replace this section with the following: 608.16.5 Connection to Lawn Irrigation System: The potable water~ to lawn irrigation system shall be protected against back flow !!I an atmospheric-type vacuum breaker, !. pressure-type vacuum breaker, !. double check-valve assembly Q! !. reduced-pressure principle back flow preventer. A valve shall not be installed downstream from !!.!!. atmospheric-type vacuum breaker. Where chemicals m introduced into the system, the potable water shall be protected !!I!. reduced pressure principle back flow preventer. Section 608.17.1: Replace this section with the following: 608.17.1: An individual water §!!lm!y shall be located constructed!! currently required !!I the State of Missouri and U.S. Government (Federal) requirements to be safeguarded against contamination. State and Federal requirements shall govern if different thari the following sections under this heading. Section 701.4 Sewage Treatment: Add the following section: 701.4.1: Private Sewage Disposal System shall be !! currently required !!I the State of Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services 19 CSR 20-3.060 Minimum Construction Standards for on-site sewage disposal system (RSMo 701.025: 701.059). Tables 702.1. 702.2, 702.3, material's column 1 delete the following: "cellular £QUQ! composite wall". Table 702.3 Building Sewer Pipe: Delete SDR 35. Section 703: Add the following sections: 703.7: Minimum size for!. building~ Q! building drain!!~ inches and!. minimum of schedule 40 (non-metallic). 703.8: Provide !. 14 gauge tracer wire over the structure's building drain from its exterior cleanout to the public~ connection (RSMo 319.033.1). Section 708.1.3: Replace this section with the following: 708.1.3 Building Drain and Building Sewer Junction: There shall be !!.!!. exterior two-way !!! double clean out at the junction of the building drain and the building ~ within five m feet of the structure unless !. different distance !! approved. The two-way fitting with !. single Bill-Page 9 Editor's note: Deleted language shown tffits. Added language shown thus. riser shall be installed !!J! to finish grade level for installations two feet (!2m: less. Two ~ and eighth bends (double clean out with ~ arranged ~ the entire n!Jili!g £!!!! be cleaned) with risers !!J! to finish grade level shall be used for installations ~ two feet (!2 deep. Plugs and caps shall be of approved ~to serve each location. Section 715.1: Replace this section with the following: 715.1 Sewage Backflow. Where plumbing fiXtures are installed !!!! ! floor with ! finished floor elevation below the elevation of the manhole cover of the next upstream manhole in the public sewer, all fixtures shall be protected Ill: ! backwater valve installed in the building drain. Section 903.1: Insert 12" for the termination extension above the roof. Section 904: Add the following section: 904.1.3 Main Vent Required: Minimum vent size required: Everv drainage system receiving discharge of ! water closet shall have ! minimum of ~ : three inch ~ vent !!! the equivalent of three : two inch ~ vents connected to the drainage system and run as direct .!!! possible through to the open air above the roof. Section 918 Air Admittance Valves: Replace this entire section with the following: 918 Air Admittance Valves: 918.1 General: Air admittance valves shall not be installed unless prior approval !! received from the code official. Section 1003.3.1: Add the following section: 1003.3.1.1 Grease Interceptor Design: The inlet (effluent) shall be two inches ~above the outlet (effluent). A center baffle shall !!!!!. to within six inches ® of the bottom inside and be sealed to the !!!!! and both sides. The outlet shall have ! tee baffle with !!!J! open and the bottom extended to within six inches ® of the bottom inside. The inlet shall have ! ~ (90°) bend sweep installed with the open end down and extended down ~ foot-four inches £r.: 4"). There shall be! man hole or holes installed so the entire inside of the interceptor£!!!! be cleaned. Section 1003.9: Add the following section: 1003.9.1 All outside interceptors when vented back to building must terminate through roof, separate from the sanitarv system. (Ord. No. 11202, § 2, 4-17-89; Ord. 12138, § 2, 8-15-94; Ord. 13578, § 2, 7-21-2003; Ord. 14106, § 1, 10- 16-2006; Ord. 14484, § 2, 3-2-2009; Ord. 14973, § I, 5-21-2012; Ord. No. 12810, § 2, 9-8-98; Ord. 14484, § 2, 3-2-2009; Ord. No. 12810, § 2, 9-8-98; Ord. 14484, § 2, 3-2-2009; Ord. No. 11905, § 8, 5-17-93; Ord. No. 15486, § 2, 2-1-2016; Ord. No. 15704, § 2, 8-21-2017; Ord. No. 15916, § 2, 5-20-2019) Bill-Page 10 Editor's note: Deleted language shown thus. Added language shown thus. Section 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from 60 calendar days after the date of its passage and approval. Passed: ___________ _ Approved: __________ _ Presiding Officer Mayor Carrie Tergin ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk City Counselor Bill-Page 11 Editor's note: Deleted language shown tftt!s. Added language shown thus. BILL NO.------- SPONSORED BY COUNCILMAN-------- ORDINANCE NO. ------------- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, AMENDING THE CITY CODE, CHAPTER 8, ARTICLE I, SECTION 8-6, SECTION 8-7, SECTION 8-8, AND SECTION 8-9 BY REPLACING THE ADOPTION OF THE 2015 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE AND 2015 INTERNATIONAL FUEL GAS CODE BY ADOPTION OF THE 2018 INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE AND 2018 INTERNATIONAL FUEL GAS CODE. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Code, Chapter 8 (Buildings and Building Regulations), Section 8-6 (Adoption of the 2015 International Mechanical Code), is hereby deleted and the following is added in lieu thereof: Sec. 8-6 Adoption of the 2018 International Mechanical Code The 2018 International Mechanical Code, published bY the International Code Council, Inc., j! hereby adopted and incorporated herein bY reference !!! the Mechanical Code of the City of Jefferson, Missouri with the additions, insertions, deletions and changes contained~ within this chapter. (Ord. No. 15705, § 1, 8-21-2017) Section 2. The City Code, Chapter 8 (Buildings and Building Regulations), Section 8-7 (Amendments), is hereby deleted and the following is added in lieu thereof: Sec. 8-7 Amendments to the 2018 International Mechanical Code. The following additions, insertions, deletions and changes ~ made to the 2018 International Mechanical Code, otherwise referred to herein !!! the Mechanical Code of the City of Jefferson: Section 101.1 Title.: Insert the words "City of Jefferson"!!! the~ of jurisdiction. Section 103 DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL INSPECTION: Delete Sections 103.1, 103.2 & 103.3 in their entirety and replace with the following: Section 103.1 General. The department of mechanical inspection known as the Department of Planning and Protective Services !! hereby continued and the executive official in charge thereof shall be known !!! the Director of Planning and Protective Services. Wherever the words Code Official appear in this Code, !! shall be held to !!!£!!!!. the Director of Planning and Protective Services or his or her designee. Bill-Page 1 Editor's note: Deleted language shown tffits. Added language shown thus. Section 103.2 Appointment. The Director of Planning and Protective Services shall be appointed and removed as provided !!I. the Citv Code. Section 103.3 Deputies. The Director of Planning and Protective Services shall recommend to the City Administrator the employment of building inspectors in sufficient numbers to ~ enforcement of the Mechanical Code. Section 106 PERMITS: Section 106.2 Permits not required.: Add the following item: 2:. Boilers that m inspected !!I. .!!. state !!! federal agency. The contractor shall orovide inspection reports to the code official to be qualified for the permit exemption. Piping and other utility connections to and from the boiler m not exempt from permit. Section 106.5.2 Fee schedule.: Delete in its entirety and replace with: The fees for work shall be as indicated in Appendix X of the City Code of the City of Jefferson. Section 106.5.3 Fee refunds.: Delete in its entirety. Section 108 VIOLATIONS: Section 108.4 Violation penalties.: Delete in its entirety and replace with: ... Any person who shall violate .!!. provision of this Code !!! shall fail to comply with any of the requirements thereof !!! who shall erect, construct, alter !!! repair mechanical work in violation of an approved plan !!! directive of the code official, !!! of .!!. permit !!! certificate issued under the provisions of this code, shall be punished !!I. .!!. fine !!! set forth in Section 1- 13 of the City Code. Each !!!!! that.!!. violation continues shall be deemed .!!. separate offense. Section 108.5 Stop work orders.: In the last sentence, replace "shall be liable for.!!. fine of not less than [AMOUNT) dollars or more than (AMOUNT) dollars.'' with "shall be subject to the penalties specified in Section 108.4." Section 109 MEANS OF APPEAL. Delete this section in its entirety and replace with: Section 109.1 General. Any owner, agent or other person shall have the right to seek judicial review of.!!. decision of the code official refusing to grant .!!. modification to the provisions of this Code covering the manner of construction !!! materials to be used in the erection, alteration or repair of work covered !!I. this code. The petition for judicial review shall be to the circuit court of Cole County .!!! established in Article 536 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri. Section 304.11 Guards. Delete the exception in its entirety. Section 504.8.2 Duct installation. Delete the last sentence ofthe first paragraph. Section 1101.10 Locking access port caps. Delete this section in its entirety. (Ord. No. 15705, § 2, 8-21-2017) Biii-Page2 Editor's note: Deleted language shown thtis. Added language shown thus. Section 3. The City Code, Chapter 8 (Buildings and Building Regulations), Section 8-8 (Adoption of the 2015 International Fuel Gas Code), is hereby deleted and the following is added in lieu thereof: Sec. 8-8.: Adoption of the 2018 International' Fuel Gas Code. The 2018 International Fuel Gas Code, published !!:y the International Code Council, Inc.,~ hereby adopted and incorporated herein !!:y reference !§. the Fuel Gas Code of the City of Jefferson, Missouri with the additions, insertions, deletions and changes contained within this chapter. (Ord. No. 15705, § 1, 8-21-2017) Section 4. The City Code, Chapter 8 (Buildings and Building Regulations), Section 8-9 (Amendments), is hereby deleted and the following is added in lieu thereof: Sec. 8-9 Amendments to the 2018 International Fuel Gas Code. The following additions, insertions, deletions and changes are made to the 2018 International Fuel Gas Code, otherwise referred to herein !§.the Fuel Gas Code of the City of Jefferson: Section 101.1 Title. Insert the words "City of Jefferson" as~ of jurisdiction. Section 103 DEPARTMENT OF INSPECTION: Delete Sections 103.1, 103.2 & 103.3 in their entirety and replace with the following: Section 103.1 General. The department of inspection known!§. the Department of Planning and Protective Services ~ hereby continued and the executive official in charge thereof shall be known !§. the Director of Planning and Protective Services. Wherever the words Code Official appear in this Code,!! shall be held to ~the Director of Planning and Protective Services or his Q! her designee. Section 103.2 Appointment. The Director of Planning and Protective Services shall be appointed and removed as provided !!:y the City Code. Section 103.3 Deputies. The Director of Planning and Protective Services shall recommend to the City Administrator the employment of building inspectors in sufficient numbers to ~enforcement of the Fuel Gas Code. Section 106 PERMITS: Section 106.6.2 Fee schedule.: Delete in its entirety and replace with: The fees for work shall be !§. indicated in Appendix Y of the City Code of the City of Jefferson. Section 106.6.3 Fee refunds.: Delete in its entirety. Section 108 VIOLATIONS: Section 108.4 Violation penalties.: Delete in its entirety and replace with: Any person who shall violate ! provision of this Code Q! shall fail to comply with !.!!Y of the requirements thereof Q! who shall erect, construct, alter Q! repair fuel ill work in violation of .!!.!! approved plan or directive of the code official, Q! of ! permit Q! certificate issued Bill-Page 3 Editor's note: Deleted language shown tlms. Added language shown thus. under the provisions of this code, shall be punished .!ll:! ~.!!!set forth in Section 1-13 of the City Code. Each !!!Y that ! violation continues shall be deemed ! separate offense. Section 108.5 Stop work orders.: In the last sentence, replace "shall be liable for ! fine of not less than [AMOUNT] dollars m: ~ than [AMOUNT] dollars." with "shall be subject to the penalties specified in Section 108.4." Section 109 MEANS OF APPEAL: Delete this section in its entirety and replace with: Section 109.1 General. Any owner, agent m: other person shall have the right to seek judicial review of ! decision of the code official refusing to grant ! modification to the provisions of this Code covering the manner of construction m: materials to be used in the erection, alteration or repair of work covered .!ll: this code. The petition for judicial review shall be to the circuit court of Cole County as established in Article 536 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri. Section 406.4 Test pressure measurement. In the last sentence, delete "five" and replace with "two". Section 406.4.1 Test pressure. Delete "3 mig .{M kPa gauge)" and replace with "20 mig (140 kPa gaugef'. Section 505.1.1 Commercial cooking appliances vented .!ll: exhaust hoods. Delete the exception and replace with: "Exception: An interlock system between the cooking appliance(s) and the exhaust hood system shall not be required where the following are provided: 1. Heat ~ or other approved methods automatically activate the exhaust hood system when cooking operations occur. 2. A listed carbon monoxide detection system .!§. installed so as to prevent appliance operation upon signal initiation. (Ord. No. 15705, § 2, 8-21-2017) Biii-Page4 Editor's note: Deleted language shown thus. Added language shown thus. Section 5. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from 60 calendar days after the date of its passage and approval. Passed: ___________ _ Approved: __________ _ Presiding Officer Mayor Carrie Tergin ATIEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk City Counselor Bill-Page 5 Editor's note: Deleted language shown tfttls. Added language shown thus. BILL NO.------- SPONSORED BY COUNCILMAN-------- ORDINANCE NO. ------------- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, AMENDING THE CITY CODE, CHAPTER 8, ARTICLE I, SECTION 8-10, AND SECTION 8-11 BY INSERTING THE ADOPTION OF THE 2018 INTERNATIONAL ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE AND AMENDMENTS TO THE 2018 INTERNATIONAL ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Code, Chapter 8 (Buildings and Building Regulations), Section 8-10 is hereby modified by inserting the adoption of the 2018 International Energy Conservation Code: Sec. 8-10 Adoption of the 2018 International Energy Conservation Code The 2018 International Energy Conservation Code, published !!f the International Code Council, Inc.,~ hereby adopted and incorporated herein !!Y reference!!§. the Energy Code of the City of Jefferson, Missouri with the additions, insertions, deletions and changes contained within this chapter. Section 2. The City Code, Chapter 8 (Buildings and Building Regulations), Section 8-11 is hereby modified by inserting the adoption of amendments to the 2018 International Energy Conservation Code: Sec. 8-11 Amendments to the 2018 International Energy Conservation Code. The following additions, insertions, deletions and changes lli made to the 2018 International Energy Conservation Code, otherwise referred to herein as the Energy Code of the City of Jefferson: Section C101.1 Title.: Insert the words "City of Jefferson" as the~ of jurisdiction. Section C101.5 Compliance. Insert the following exception: Exception: One-and two-family dwellings and multiple single-family dwellings (townhouses) shall meet the provisions of the International Residential Code as adopted !!f the City of Jefferson. Section C104 Fees. Section C104.2 Schedule of permit fees. Delete this section in its entirety and replace with the following: The fees for work shall be !!§.indicated in Appendix Y of the Citv Code of the City of Jefferson. Bill-Page 1 Editor's note: Deleted language shown tffils. Added language shown thus. Section C104.5 Refunds. Delete this section in its entirety. Section C108.4 Failure to comply. Delete this section in its entirety and replace with the following: Any person who shall continue any work in .!!! about the structure after having been served with .!!. stop work order. except such work as that person !! directed to perform to remove .!!. violation or unsafe conditions, shall be punished ~.!!.fine !!! set forth in Section 1-13 of the City Code. Each ~ that.!!. violation continues shall be deemed a separate offense. Section C109 Board of Appeals. Delete this section in its entirety and replace with: Section 109.1 General. Any owner, agent.!!! other person shall have the right to seek judicial review. of .!!. decision of the code official refusing to grant .!!. modification to the provisions of this Code covering the manner of construction .!!! materials to be used in the erection, alteration or repair of work covered~ this code. The petition for judicial review shall be to the circuit court of Cole County !!! established in Article 536 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri. Section R101.1 Title.: Insert the words "City of Jefferson"!!! the~ of jurisdiction. Section R101.5 Compliance. Insert the following exception: Exception: One-and two-family dwellings and multiple single-family dwellings (townhouses) shall meet the provisions of the International Residential Code !!! adopted ~ the City of Jefferson. Section R104 Fees. Section R104.2 Schedule of permit fees. Delete this section in its entirety and replace with the following: The fees for work shall be as indicated in Appendix X of the City Code of the City of Jefferson. Section R104.5 Refunds. Delete this section in its entirety. Section R108.4 Failure to comply. Delete this section in its entirety and replace with the following: Any person who shall continue .!!!!Y work in .!!! about the structure after having been served with.!!. stop work order. except such work!! that person!! directed to perform to remove.!!. violation.!!! unsafe conditions. shall be punished~.!!. fine as set forth in Section 1-13 of the City Code. Each day that .!!. violation continues shall be deemed a separate offense. Section R109 Board of Appeals. Delete this section in its entirety and replace with: Section 109.1 General. Any owner, agent.!!! other person shall have the right to seek judicial review of.!!. decision of the code official refusing to grant .!!. modification to the provisions of this Code covering the manner of construction .!!! materials to be used in the erection, alteration.!!! repair of work covered~ this code. The petition for judicial review shall be to the circuit court of Cole County !!! established in Article 536 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri. Biii-Page2 Editor's note: Deleted language shown~-Added language shown thus. Section 3. The City Code, Chapter 8 (Buildings and Building Regulations), "Sections 8-10-8-17. Reserved", is hereby modified by deleting and inserting "Sections 8-12-8-17. Reserved" Section 4. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from 60 calendar days after the date of its passage and approval. Passed: ___________ _ Approved: __________ _ Presiding Officer Mayor Carrie Tergin ATIEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk City Counselor Bill-Page 3 Editor's note: Deleted language shown tlms. Added language shown thus. BILL NO.------- SPONSORED BY COUNCILMAN-------- ORDINANCE NO. ------------- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, AMENDING THE CITY CODE, CHAPTER 8, ARTICLE II, SECTION 8-18, SECTION 8-19, SECTION 8'-21, SECTION 8-22, SECTION 8-23, SECTION 8-24, SECTION 8-25, AND SECTION 8-26 BY REPLACING THE ADOPTION OF THE 2015 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE, 2015 INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE, 2015 INTERNATIONAL EXISTING BUILDING CODE, AND 2015 INTERNATIONAL SWIMMING POOL AND SPA CODE AND THEIR AMENDMENTS BY ADOPTION OF THE 2018 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE, 2018 INTERNATIONAL RESIDENTIAL CODE, 2018 EXISTING BUILDING CODE, AND 2018 INTERNATIONAL SWIMMING POOL AND SPA CODE AND AMENDMENTS. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Code, Chapter 8 (Buildings and Building Regulations), Section 8-18 (Adoption of the 2015 International Building Code), is hereby deleted and the following is added in lieu thereof: Sec. 8-18. Adoption of the 2018 International Building Code. The 2018 International Building Code, published ~ the International Code Council, Inc., ~ hereby adopted and incorporated herein ~ reference~ the Building Code of the City of Jefferson, Missouri with the additions, insertions, deletions and changes contained within this chapter. (Code 1977, § 8-1; Ord. No. 10397, § 6, 4-1-85; Code 1983, § 7-18; Ord. No. 1120I, § 4-I7-89; Ord. No. 11578, § 4, 5-20-9I; Ord. No. I2757, § 4, 6-1-98; Ord. I3577, I, 7-2I-2003; Ord. I4I05, § 1, IO-I6-2006; Ord. I4483, § 1, 3-2-2009; Ord. No. I4973, §I, 5-2I-20I2; Ord. No. 15706, § 1, 8-21-2017) Section 2. The City Code, Chapter 8 (Buildings and Building Regulations), Section 8-19 (Amendments to the 2015 International Building Code), is hereby deleted and the following is added in lieu thereof: Sec. 8-19. Amendments to the 20181nternational Building Code. The following additions, insertions, deletions and changes are made to the 2018 International Building Code, otherwise referred to herein as the Building Code of the City of Jefferson: Section 101.1 Title. Insert the words "City of Jefferson"~~ of jurisdiction. Section 103 Department of Building Safety. Delete Section in its entirety and replace with the following: · Bill-Page 1 Editor's note: Deleted language shown tffits. Added language shown thus. Section 103.1 Creation of enforcement agency. The department of building safety known !!! the Department of Planning and Protective Services ~ hereby continued and the executive official in charge thereof shall be known !!! the Director of Planning and Protective Services. Wherever the words Building Official appear in this Code, i! shall be held to ~ the Director of Planning and Protective Services or his or her designee. Section 103.2 Appointment. The Director of Planning and Protective Services shall be appointed and removed as provided !!I the City Code. Section 103.3 Deputies. The Director of Planning and Protective Services shall recommend to the City Administrator the employment of building inspectors, plan examiners and other employees in sufficient numbers to assure enforcement of the Building Code. Section 105.2 Work exempt from permit. Delete Building item b. Fences not over Z feet (2134 mm) high. Section 106 Floor and roof design loads. Delete this section in its entirety. Section 107 Submittal documents. Insert the following at the end of the section: As ! normal practice, the Building Official has waived the detailed administrative reporting requirements of Section 1704. The designer of record shall submit the following !!! part of the submittal documents (Section 107): 1. Summarv of contracted construction administration services for the designer and sub- consultants of record 2. A summary description of Special Inspections ordered 3. Name of all testing agencies The testing agency(s) shall submit ! summary report to the Building Official at the end of the project listing all special inspections performed with ! list of all failed tests and their respective corrective action(s) for the permit file. Section 109 Fees: Add the following to this section: Section 109.7 Fee Schedule. The fees for building construction permits shall be set in Appendix Y of the Code of the City of Jefferson. Section 109.8 Fee for rum!!!ty for failure to obtain! building permit. Where work for which ! permit ~ required !!I this Code ~ started prior to obtaining said permit, the fees specified in Appendix X of the Code of the City of Jefferson shall be doubled. Should l!!!.Y. person, firm or corporation commit! second offense !!I starting work without permit after so doing Q!!! previous occasion, he shall P!Y three times the customary fee in order to obtain the necessary permit. Any offense shall subject the offender to prosecution under section 114.4. In the event l!!!.Y. person firm or corporation fails to obtain the necessary permit(s) within ~ days after being notified in writing to do so !!I the Code official, he shall P!Y in addition to the usual fee.!!.! increased penalty!!! provided above the~ of $25.00 for each !!!v in excess of the aforesaid~ days that transpire prior to his .!!.! her obtaining the necessary permit. The payment of any .!!.! several of the above stated penalty fees shall not relieve l!!!.Y. person, firm .!!.! corporation from fully complying with the requirements of this code in the execution of the work!!..!!.! from .!!!!I other penalties prescribed herein, .!!.! in the City Code. Section 113 Board of Appeals. Delete Section in its entirety and replace with the following: Section 113.1 Judicial review. Any owner, agent.!!.! other person shall have the right to seek judicial review of ! decision of the Building Official refusing to grant ! modification to the provisions of this Code covering the manner of construction .!!.! materials to be used in the Bill-Page 2 Editor's note: Deleted language shown tffits. Added language shown thus. erection, alteration or repair of.!! building Q! structure. The petition for judicial review shall be to the circuit court of Cole County ~ established in Article 536 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri. Section 114.4 Violation Penalties: Delete Section in its entirety and replace with the following: Any person who shall violate .!! provision of this Code Q! shall fail to comply with !!!Y. of the requirements thereof Q! who shall erect, construct, alter Q! repair .!! building Q! structure in violation of an approved plan Q! directive of the Building Official, Q! of .!! permit Q! certificate issued under the provisions of this Code, shall be punished ~.!!fine!!! set forth in Section 1-13 of the City Code. Each lli!.v that.!! violation continues shall be deemed a separate offense. Section 305.2.3 Five or few children in .!! dwelling unit. Replace "five" with "ten" in the title and text of this section. Section 308.5.4 Five Q! fewer persons receiving ~ in .!! dwelling unit. Replace "five" with "ten" in the title and text of this section. Section 423 Storm Shelters. Modify this section ~follows: Section 423.1 General.: Modify the first sentence to read: "This section applies to the new construction of storm shelters constructed as separate detached buildings or constructed ~ !Q.Q.!ill. Q! spaces within buildings for the purpose of providing protection from storms that produce high winds, such as tornadoes and hurricanes, during the storm. Section 423.2 Construction.: Insert after the first sentence: "The City of Jefferson design wind speed under ICC 500 Section 304.2 shall be 200 miles ~hour." Section 423.4 Group E occupancies.: Replace "occupant load of 50" with "occupant load of 100". Section 1612.3 Establishment of flood hazard~ Replace "[INSERT NAME OF JURISDICTION!" with "City of Jefferson City" and replace "[INSERT DATE OF ISSUANCE]" with "November b 2012". ~ 1809.5 Frost protection. Add to item! the following sentence: The frost line of the City of Jefferson ~twenty-four 00 inches. Section 3001.2 Emergency elevator communication systems for the deaf, hard of hearing and speech impaired. Delete this section in its entirety. Section 3113.1 General. Add the following exception: This section shall not .!!JlP!y to one-storv detached relocatable buildings less than 400 square feet in floor ~ being used ~ offices Q! storage for permitted work on .!! permanent building or structure on the same parcel. (Ord. No. 10221, § 1, 6-4-84; Ord. No. 11201, § 3, 4-17-89; Ord. No. 11578, § 3, 5-20-91; Ord. No. 11704, § 2, 2-3-92; Ord. No. 12757, § 3, 6-1-98; Ord. 13577, § 2, 7-21-2003; Ord. 14483, § 2, 3-2-2009; Ord. No. 15706, § 2, 8-21-2017) Section 3. The City Code, Chapter 8 (Buildings and Building Regulations), Section 8-21 (Adoption of the 2015 International Residential Code), is hereby deleted and the following is added in lieu thereof: Bill-Page 3 Editor's note: Deleted language shown tffi!s. Added language shown thus. Sec. 8-21 Adoption of the 2018 International Residential Code The 2018 International Residential Code, for One and Two Family Dwellings, published m:_ the International Code Council, including Appendix J.s ~ hereby adopted and incorporated herein m:_ reference !!! the Residential Code of the City of Jefferson, Missouri with the additions, insertions, deletions and changes contained within this chapter. (Ord. No. 15706, § 3, 8-21-2017) Section 4. The City Code, Chapter 8 (Buildings and Building Regulations), Section 8-22 (Amendments to the 2015 International Residential Code), is hereby deleted and the following is added in lieu thereof: Sec. 8-22 Amendments to the 2018 International Residential Code. The following additions, insertions, deletions and changes !!£. made to the 2018 International Residential Code, for One-and Two-Family Dwellings otherwise referred to herein as the Residential Code of the City of Jefferson: Section R101.1 Title. Insert the words "City of Jefferson" as~ of jurisdiction. Section R101.2 Scope. Within Exception b remove the words "five QI fewer" and replace with "four QI five". Section R103 Department of Building Safety. Delete Section in its entirety and replace with the following: Section R103.1 General. The department of building safety known as the Department of Planning and Protective Services ~ hereby continued and the executive official in charge thereof shall be known as the Director of Planning and Protective Services. Wherever the words Building Official appear in this Code,!! shall be held to !!!!ll!!!. the Director of Planning and Protective Services or his or her designee. Section R103.2 Appointment. The Director of Planning and Protective Services shall be appointed and removed as provided m:_ the City Code. Section R103.3 Deputies. The Director of Planning and Protective Services shall recommend to the City Administrator the employment of building inspectors, plans examiners and other employees in sufficient numbers to ~ enforcement of the Residential Code. Section R105.2 Work exempt from permits. Delete Building Item ~ and replace with: b. Non-structural building envelope repair work for existing structures. Section R108 Fees. Add the following to this section: Section R108.7 Fee Schedule. The fees for building construction permits shall be set in Appendix X of the Code of the City of Jefferson. Section R108.8 Fee for~ for failure to obtain! building permit. Where work for which ! permit ~ required m:_ this Code ~ started prior to obtaining said permit, the fees specified Bill-Page 4 Editor's note: Deleted language shown tffits. Added language shown thus. in Appendix Y of the Code of the City of Jefferson shall be doubled. Should !.!U:: person, firm .!!! corporation commit ! second offense !!v starting work without permit after so doing !!!!. ! previous occasion, he shall P!Y three times the customary fee in order to obtain the necessary permit. Any offense shall subject the offender to prosecution under section R113.4. In the event !.!U:: person firm or corporation fails to obtain the necessary permit(s) within ~ days after being notified in writing to do ~ !!v the Code official, he shall P!Y in addition to the usual fee .Q! increased penalty .!!! provided above the sum of $25.00 for each !l!v in ~ of the aforesaid ~ days that transpire prior to his .!!! her obtaining the necessary permit. The payment of any .Q! several of the above stated penalty fees shall not relieve any person, firm .!!! corporation from fully complying with the requirements of this code in the execution of the work!!!!! from any other penalties prescribed herein, .!!! in the City Code. Section R112 Board of Appeals. Delete this section in its entirety and replace with: Section R112.1 General. Any owner, agent .!!! other person shall have the right to seek judicial review of! decision of the code official refusing to grant ! modification to the provisions of this Code covering the manner of construction .!!! materials to be used in the erection, alteration .!!! repair of work covered !!v this code. The petition for judicial review shall be to the circuit court of Cole County .!!! established in Article 536 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri. Section R113.4 Violation Penalties. Delete Section in its entirety and replace with the following: Any person who shall violate ! provision of this Code or shall fail to comply with !.!U:: of the requirements thereof or who shall erect, construct, alter .!!! repair ! building or structure in violation of !!! approved plan .!!! directive of the Building Official, .!!! of ! permit .!!! certificate issued under the provisions of this Code, shall be punished !!v! fine as set forth in Section 1-13 ofthe City Code. Each !l!v that! violation continues shall be deemed! separate offense. Section R114.2 Unlawful continuance. Delete section in its entirety and replace with the following: Any person who shall continue any work in or about the structure after having been served with ! stop work order, except such work as that person .!§. directed to perform to remove ! violation or unsafe conditions, shall be liable for penalties specified in Section R113.4. Table R301.2(1) Climatic and Geographic Design Criteria. Use the following values for the table: Ground Snow Load = 20 PSF Wind Design Speed = 115 MPH· Wind Design Topographic Effects= NO Wind Design Special Wind Region =NO Wind Design Windborne Debris Zone= NO Seismic Design Category-:!! Subject to Damage from Weathering= SEVERE Subject to Damage from Frost Line Depth = 24 INCHES Subject to Damage from Termite= MODERATE TO HEAVY Winter Design Temp : 4°F Ice Barrier Underlayment Required= YES Flood Hazards-Ordinance passed: March !2s 1980; flood maps dated November b. 2012 Bill-Page 5 Editor's note: Deleted language shown tfttis. Added language shown thus. Air Freezing Index = 903 Mean Annual Temp = 55°F Section R302.5.1 Opening protection. Delete "equipped with !! self-closing or automatic-closing device" from the end of the section. Section R302.11 Fireblocking. Delete item 4. Section R302.13 Fire protection of floors. Add the following exceptions: ~Open-web wood truss floor joists with draft stopping~ 1,000 square feet. ~ Closed-web wood joists with ~ill hour fire treating. Section R307.1 Space required. Add the following: Water closet: All water closets shall be spaced at least fifteen@ inches from the centerline of the fixture to !!!Y wall Q! plumbing fixture, except the centerline of the water closet may be spaced twelve !.!l} inches if located next to !! bathtub/shower unit. Section R309.5 Fire sprinklers. Delete this section in its entirety. Section R311.7.3 Vertical rise. Delete this section in its entiretv. Section R311.7.5.1 Risers. Add exception: J.:. Closed risers !!.!!! not required on exterior stairs where the riser ~ less than ten aiD. feet above grade. Section R312.2 Window fall protection. Delete this section in its entirety. Section R313 Automatic fire sprinkler systems. Delete this section in its entirety and insert the following: R313.1 General. A builder of!! single family dwelling or residences or multi-unit dwellings of four or fewer units shall offer to !!!Y purchaser, Q.!! or before the time of entering into the purchase contract, the option at the purchaser's cost to install !!!: equip an automatic fire sprinkler system in the dwelling, residence !!! unit. Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrarv, no purchaser of such !! single-family dwelling, residence, !!!: multi-unit dwelling shall be denied the right to choose .!!.! decline to install .!!!!. automatic fire sprinkler system in such dwelling Q! residence. Pursuant to RSMo. §67.281, the purchasers right to choose and the requirement that the builders offer to purchasers the option to purchase .!!!!. automatic fire sprinkler system in connection with the purchase of !!!Y single-family dwelling, residence, or multi-unit dwelling of four.!!.! fewer units ~hereby incorporated. Section R314.4 Interconnection. Replace the beginning of the Exception paragraph first sentence (Interconnection of smoke alarms in existing areas shall not be required ... ) with: Exception: "Interconnection of smoke alarms in existing areas may use wireless technology or shall not be required ... " Section R403.1.3.3 Slabs-on-ground with turned-down footings. Delete seismic categories from the first sentence. Section R404.4 Retaining walls. Add the following to the end of the section: Exception: Cast-in-place walls retaining !ill. to 96 inches of unbalanced ffi!, Q! !ill. to 48 inches in height that resist lateral loads in addition to soil, shall not require engineering. Bill-Page 6 Editor's note: Deleted language shown~-Added language shown thus. Section R602.3.1 Stud size, height and spacing. Add the following sentence to the end of Exception 2: Alternatively, 1. ! 2 No. 1. grade studs supporting !! roof and floor load with not more than ten am feet of tributary length shall have!! maximum stud height of fourteen (ill feet. Chapter 11 Energy Efficiency. Delete the chapter in its entirety and insert in its place Chapter!! of the 2009 edition of the International Residential Code. Section AJ1 02.4.4 Window control devices. Delete the section in its entirety. (Code 1977, § 8-IO; Ord. No. 9536, §§ 2, 3, I0-20-80; Ord. I3577, § 2, 7-2I-2003; Ord. I4272, § 5, IO-I5- 2007; Ord. I4437, §I, 1I-I7-2008; Ord. I4483, § 2, 3-2-2009; Ord. No. I5706, § 4, 8-2I-20I7) Section 5. The City Code, Chapter 8 (Buildings and Building Regulations), Section 8-23 (Adoption of the 2015 International Existing Building Code}, is hereby deleted and the following is added in lieu thereof: Sec. 8-23. Adoption of the 2018 International Existing Building Code. The 2018 International Existing Building Code, published hv the International Code Council, Inc., !§. hereby adopted and incorporated herein hv reference !!.§. the Existing Building Code of the City of Jefferson, Missouri with the additions, insertions, deletions and changes contained within this chapter. (Ord. No. I5707, §I, 8-2I-2017) Section 6. The City Code, Chapter 8 (Buildings and Building Regulations), Section 8-24 (Amendments), is hereby deleted and the following is added in lieu thereof: Sec. 8-24. Amendments to the 2018 International Existing Building Code. The following additions, insertions, deletions and changes m made to the 2018 International Building Code, otherwise referred to herein!!.§. the Existing Building Code of the City of Jefferson: Section 101.1 Title. Insert the words "City of Jefferson"!!.§.~ of jurisdiction. Section 103 Department of Building Safety. Delete Section in its entirety and replace with the following: Section 103.1 Creation of enforcement agency. The department of building safety known as the Department of Planning and Protective Services !§. hereby continued and the executive official in charge thereof shall be known !!.§. the Director of Planning and Protective Services. Wherever the words Building Official appear in this Code, !! shall be held to ~ the Director of Planning and Protective Services Q! his Q! her designee. Section 103.2 Appointment. The Director of Planning and Protective Services shall be appointed and removed as provided hv the City Code. Section 103.3 Deputies. The Director of Planning and Protective Services shall recommend Bill-Page 7 Editor's note: Deleted language shown tftt!s. Added language shown thus. to the City Administrator the employment of building inspectors, plan examiners and other employees in sufficient numbers to~ enforcement of the Building Code. Section 105.2 Work exempt from permit. Add the following under the Building portion: L. Non-structural building envelope repair work for existing structures covered under the International Residential Code for One-and Two-family Dwellings. Section 108 Fees: Add the following to this section: Section 108.7 Fee Schedule. The fees .for building construction permits shall be set in Appendix Y of the Code of the City of Jefferson.· Section 112 Board of Appeals. Delete Section in its entirety and replace with the following: Section 113.1 Judicial review. Any owner, agent Q! other person shall have the right to seek judicial review of.!!. decision of the Building Official refusing to grant .!!. modification to the provisions of this Code covering the manner of construction Q! materials to be used in the erection, alteration Q! repair of.!!. building Q! structure. The petition for judicial review shall be to the circuit court of Cole County !!§. established in Article 536 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri. Section 113.4 Violation Penalties: Delete Section in its entirety and replace with the following: Any person who shall violate .!!. provision of this Code or shall fail to comply with l!!!V. of the requirements thereof Q! who shall erect, construct, alter or repair .!!. building Q! structure in violation of .!!!! approved plan or directive of the Building Official, or of .!!. permit or certificate issued under the provisions of this Code, shall be punished ~.!!.fine !!§.set forth in Section 1-13 of the City Code. Each lli!v. that.!!. violation continues shall be deemed a separate offense. Section 116.6 Hearing. Delete section.in its entirety. Section 702.4 Window opening cont~ol devices Q!! replacement windows. Delete the text "and ~ and two-family dwellings and townhouses regulated ~ the International Residential Code" from the first sentence. Section 1002.1 Compliance with the building code. Replace "the building shall comply with all of the applicable requirements" with "the affected portion of the building shall comply with all of the applicable requirements". Section 1301.2 Applicability. In the first sentence, replace "Structures existing prior to [DATE TO BE INSERTED BY THE JURISDICTION), in which there !! work" with "Existing structures in which there !! work". (Ord. No. 15707, § 1, 8-21-2017) Section 7. The City Code, Chapter 8 (Buildings and Building Regulations}, Section 8-25 (Adoption of the 2015 International Swimming Pool and Spa Code), is hereby deleted and the following is added in lieu thereof: Sec. 8-25. Adoption of the 2018 International Swimming Pool and Spa Code. The 2018 International Swimming Pool and Spa Code, published ~the International Code Council, Inc.,!! hereby adopted and incorporated herein ~ reference as the Swimming Pool and Spa Code of Bill-Page 8 Editor's note: Deleted language shown tffits. Added language shown thus. the City of Jefferson, Missouri with the additions, insertions, deletions and changes contained within this chapter. (Ord. No. 15708, § 1, 8-21-2017) Section 8. The City Code, Chapter 8 (Buildings and Building Regulations), Section 8-26 (Amendments), is hereby deleted and the following is added in lieu thereof: Sec. 8-26. Amendments to the 2018 International Swimming Pool and Spa Code. The following additions, insertions, deletions and changes !..!:!! made to the 2018 International Swimming Pool and Spa Code, otherwise referred to herein ~ the Swimming Pool and Spa Code of the City of Jefferson: Section 101.1 Title. Insert the words "City of Jefferson" as the name of jurisdiction. Section 103 Department of Building Safety. Delete Section in its entirety and replace with the following: Section 103.1 General. The department of building safety known ~ the Department of Planning and Protective Services .!§. hereby continued and the executive official in charge thereof shall be known ~ the Director of Planning and Protective Services. Wherever the words code official appear in this Code, !! shall be held to !.!!£!!.!!.the Director of Planning and Protective Services Q! his or her designee. Section 103.2 Appointment. The Director of Planning and Protective Services shall be appointed and removed as provided .!rr_ the City Code. Section 103.3 Deputies. The Director of Planning and Protective Services shall recommend to the City Administrator the employment of building inspectors, plans examiners and other employees in sufficient numbers to~ enforcement of the Residential Code. Section 105.6.2 Fee schedule. Delete this section and replace with the following: The fees for construction permits shall be set in Appendix Y of the Code of the City of Jefferson. Section 105.6.3 Fee refunds. Delete this section in its entirety. Section 107.4 Violation penalties. Delete this section and replace with the following: Any person who shall violate l! provision of this Code or shall fail to comply with l!!!Y of the requirements thereof Q! who repairs or alters Q! changes the occupancy of l! building Q! structure in violation of the approved construction documents Q! directive of the code official or of l! permit Q! certificate issued under the provisions of this code, shall be punished .!rr_ l! fine as set forth in Section 1-13 of the City Code. Each !!l!v that l! violation continues shall be deemed a separate offense. Section 107.5 Stop work orders. In the last sentence, replace "shall be liable to l! fine of not less than [AMOUNT] dollars or .!!!..!!!!< than IAMOUNTI dollars." with "shall be liable for penalties ~ specified in Section 107.4." Section 108 Means of Appeal. Delete this section and replace with the following: Bill-Page 9 Editor's note: Deleted language shown tffits. Added language shown thus. Section 108.1 Judicial review. Any owner, agent Q! other person shall have the right to seek judicial review of.!! decision of the code official refusing to grant .!! modification to the provisions of this code covering the manner of construction Q! materials to be used in the erection, alteration or repair of work covered !!v this code. The petition for judicial review shall be to the circuit court of Cole County !!! established in Article 536 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri. (Ord. No. 15708, § 2, 8-21-20 17) Section 9. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from 60 calendar days after the date of its passage and approval. Passed: ___________ _ Approved:, __________ _ Presiding Officer Mayor Carrie Tergin ATTEST:, APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk City Counselor Bill-Page 10 Editor's note: Deleted language shown the&. Added language shown thus. BILL NO.------------ SPONSORED BY COUNCILMAN---------- ORDINANCENO. ------------------- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, AMENDING THE CITY CODE, CHAPTER 8, SECTION 8-49 AND SECTION 8-50 BY REPLACING THE ADOPTION OF THE 2015 INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE AND AMENDMENTS TO THE 2015 INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE BY ADOPTION OF THE 2018 INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, AS FOLLOWS: Section1. The City Code, Chapter 8 (Buildings and Building Regulations), Section 8-49 (Adoption of 2015 International Property Maintenance Code), is hereby deleted and the following is added in lieu thereof: Sec. 8-49. Adoption of the 2018 International Property Maintenance Code. The 2018 International Property Maintenance Code !!§. published !!I. the International Code Council Inc . .!! hereby adopted and incorporated herein !!I. reference as the Property Maintenance Code of the City of Jefferson, with the additions, insertions, deletions and changes contained herein. Section 2. The City Code, Chapter 8 (Buildings and Building Regulations), Section 8-50 (Amendments to the 20151nternational Property Maintenance Code), is hereby deleted and the following is added in lieu thereof: Sec. 8-50. Amendments, insertions and deletions to the 2018 International Property Maintenance Code. · The following additions, insertions, deletions and changes m made to the 2018 International Property Maintenance Code otherwise referred to herein as the Property Maintenance Code of the City of Jefferson: Section 101.1: Insert the words "City of Jefferson" as the name of jurisdiction. Section 101.5: Add the following section: Section 101.5 City Code. When sections of the Property Maintenance Code differ from the City Code of Jefferson, the provisions of the City Code of Jefferson shall govern. Bill-Page 1 Editor's note: Deleted language shown tffits. Added language shown thus. Section 103: Department of Property Maintenance Inspection : Delete Sections 103.1 through 103.3, and insert the following in its place: Section 103.1: General The department of property maintenance known !! the Department of Planning and Protective Services !§. hereby continued and the executive official in charge thereof shall be known ,!! the Director of Planning and Protective Services. Wherever the words code official apliears in this code, i! shall !!!!l!!! the Director of Planning and Protective Services m:. his m:. her designee. Section 103.2: APPOINTMENT The Director of Planning and Protective Services shall be appointed and removed !! provided~ City Code. Section 103.3: DEPUTIES The Director of Planning and Protective Services shall recommend to the City Administrator the employment of inspectors and other employees in sufficient numbers to assure enforcement of the Property Maintenance Code. Section 106.4: Delete this section and replace i! with the following: Section 106.4 Violation Penalties: Any person who shall violate .!!!!Y of the provisions of the code hereby adopted or fail !!! comply therewith, m:. who shall violate m:. fail to comply with any order made thereunder, m:. who shall build in violation of .!!!!Y detailed statement m:. specifications m:. plans submitted and approved thereunder. m:. .!!!!Y certificate or permit issued thereunder, and from which!!!!. appeal has been taken m:. who shall fail to comply with such !!!. order as affirmed or modified ~ the City Council m:. ~ ! court of competent jurisdiction, within the time fixed herein, shall severally for each and everv such violation and noncompliance respectively, be gyilly of !!!. ordinance violation. punishable ~ ! fine !! set forth in Section 1-13 of City Code. The imposition of one penalty for any violation shall not excuse the violation or permit i! to continue: and all such persons shall be required to correct m:. remedy such violations or defects within ! reasonable time; and when not otherwise specified. each ten aiD. days that prohibited conditions are maintained shall constitute ! separate offense. The application of the above penalty shall not be held to prevent the enforced removal of prohibited conditions. Delete this section and replace i! with the following: Section 111.1 Means of Appeal Any owner, occupant, lessee, mortgagee, agent m:. 'other person having !!!. interest in the building m:. structure may seek review of the order and determination of the code official ~requesting a hearing in accordance with the procedures set forth in Sections 21-8 and 21-9 of the City Code. Bill-Page 2 Editor's note: Deleted language shown thus. Added language shown thus. Section 302.4: Insert "twelve .(!11 inches in height ~ City Code Chapter 21" for the jurisdiction requirement. Section 602.3: This section shall read as follows: Section 602.3 Heat Supply Every owner and operator of any building who rents, leases or lets one or more dwelling units or sleeping units on terms, either expressed or implied, to furnish heat to the occupants thereof shall supply heat during the period from September 1 to June 1 to maintain a minimum temperature of 68°F (20°C) in all habitable rooms, bathrooms and toilet rooms. Section 602.4: This section shall read as follows: 602.4 Occupiable work spaces. Indoor occupiable work spaces shall be supplied with heat during the period from September 1 to June 1 to maintain a minimum temperature of 65°F (18°C) during the period the spaces are occupied. (Ord. No. 11203 § 6, 4-17-89; Ord. No. 12758, § 2, 6-1-98; Ord. 13580, § 1, 7-21-2003; Ord. 14104, § 1, 10- 16-2006; Ord 14482, § 1, 3-2-2009; Ord. No. 14973, § 1, 5-21-2012; Ord. No. 11203 § 6, 4-17-89; Ord. No. 12758, § 2, 6-1-98; Ord. No. 11203 § 6, 4-17-89; Ord. No. 12758, § 2, 6-1-98; Ord. 13580, § 1, 7-21-2003; Ord. 14104, § 1, 10-16-2006; Ord 14482, § 1, 3-2-2009; Ord. No. 14973, § 1, 5-21-2012; Ord. No. 15709, § 2, 8-21-2017; Ord. No. 15989, § 1, 1-6-20) Section 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from 60 calendar days after the date of its passage and approval. Passed: ___________ _ Approved: __________ _ Presiding Officer Mayor Carrie Tergin ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk City Counselor Bill-Page 3 Editor's note: Deleted language shown tfttts. Added language shown thus. BILL NO.------- SPONSORED BY COUNCILMAN-------- ORDINANCE NO. ------------- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, AMENDING THE CITY CODE, CHAPTER 13, ARTICLE Ill, SECTION 13-42 AND SECTION 13-43 BY REPLACING THE ADOPTION OF THE 2015 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE AND AMENDMENTS TO THE 2015 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE BY ADOPTION OF THE 2018 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, AS FOLLOWS: Section1. The City Code, Chapter 13 (Fire Prevention and Protection), Section 13-42 (Adoption of the 2015 International Fire Code), is hereby deleted and the following is added in lieu thereof: Sec. 13-42. Adoption of the 2018 International Fire Code The 2018 International Fire Code published Ill. the International Code Council, including appendices ~!;_It! and Ks!! hereby adopted and incorporated herein Ill. reference as the Fire Code of the City of Jefferson, with the additions, insertions, deletions and changes contained within this ordinance. (Code 1977, § 17-11; Ord. No. 9398, §I, 3-3-80; Ord. No. 10670, § 5, 6-16-86, Ord. No. 11158, § 1, 2-13- 89; Ord. No. 11610, § 5, 8-6-91; Ord. No. 14974, § 1, 5-21-2012; Ord. No. 15702, § 1, 8-21-2017, eff. 10- 21-2017) Section 2. The City Code, Chapter 13 (Fire Prevention and Protection), Section 13-43 (Amendments to the 2015 International Fire Code), is hereby deleted and the following is added in lieu thereof: Sec. 13-43. Amendments to the 2018 International Fire Code The following additions, insertions, deletions and changes are made to the 2018 International Fire Code, otherwise referred to herein as the Fire Code of the City of Jefferson: Delete Section 101.1, and insert the following in its place: 101.1 Title. These regulations shall be known !!! the Fire Code of the City of Jefferson hereinafter referred to !!! such !!! !!! "this code." Delete section 103.2, and insert the following in its place: 103.2 Appointment. The fire code official shall be appointed Ill. the City Administrator. Delete Section 105.1.2 and insert the following in its place: 105.1.2 Permits Required. Notwithstanding i!!!Y provisions to the contrary in other sections of this Code, permits required in i!!!Y section of this Code shall be procured from the chief of the fire department unless City Code Chapter~ lists the subject matter of the permit, in which ~ the permit shall be procured from the Building Official !!! his !!! her designee. Bill-Page 1 Editor's note: Deleted language shown tffits. Added language shown thus. Permits shall at all times be kept in the premises designated therein and shall at all times be subject to inspection ID: the code official. Delete Sections 109.1 through 109.3 and insert the following in its place 109.1 General. Any owner, agent!!! other person shall have the right to seek judicial review of .!! decision of the code official refusing to grant .!! modification to the provisions of this code. The petition for judicial review shall be to the circuit court of Cole Countv !!! established in Article 536 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri. Add the following to Section 110.4 Violation Penalties Penalty for violations shall be subject to the penalties set forth in Section 1-13 of the City Code. Add the following to Section 110.4: 110.4.2 Damage to fire department equipment: Any negligent !!! willful damage to fire department equipment caused ID: !!!! person subject to this code shall be punishable ID: .!! fine!!! set forth in Section 1-13 of the City Code JW: occurrence of damage. This fine shall not be construed to preclude monetarv recoverv of damages ID: the City through civil proceedings. Change the last sentence in Section 112.4 to: 11 ••• fine as set forth in Section 1-13 of the City Code. 11 Insert the following in Section 307. 307.6 Allowable burning. Open burning shall be allowed without prior notification to the code official for: recreational fires, fires used for the preparation of food, highway safety flares, smudge pots and similar occupational needs, and fires used for training fire enforcement personnel. 307.6.1 Yard Waste. Open burning of leaves, grass clippings, tree limbs, and vegetation grown !!!! .!! property !! permitted from November ! of each year through March ! of the following year, during daylight hours unless restricted!!! prohibited under section 307.2.1 ID: the Code Official. In the event of an emergency declared ID: the Mayor, or person acting .!!§. such, the City Administrator may authorize the open burning of yard waste, branches, trees, and other materials he deems appropriate and under such conditions !!! he may proscribe. 307.6.2 Responsible .P.!!!tv:. The person conducting.!! burn under subsection 307.6.1 shall be the .!!l!!!!ll: of the property unless tlie ~ has expressly directed ~ other person to conduct such burn !!!! the property. 307.6.3 Adjustment to permissible burning. The burning period as specified in 307.6.1 and 307.6.2 above may be adjusted ID: the Fire Chief for safety reasons provided the total number of days of the burning periods shall not be increased. In the event that subsequent to the determination of the periods during which burning !! permitted, the Fire Chief invokes a temporarv ban during the period, the Fire Chief may extend the period ID: the number of days in which the ban !! imposed. 307.6.4 Ceremonial Fires. Bonfires and other fires which do not~ within.!! designated device such !!! .!! barbeque grill. fireplace. outdoor stove, !!! outdoor heater, may be conducted only ID: permission of the Fire Chief. !!! his or her designee. and under such conditions as he may impose for the safety of persons and property. 307.6.5 Notification and permission: Open burning shall be allowed with prior notification to the Code Official and upon receipt of written permission from Missouri Department of Natural Resources ~ provided that !!!! conditions specified in the permission ~ followed for: Bill-Page 2 Editor's note: Deleted language shown the&. Added language shown thus. 1. Disposal of hazardous !!! toxic material where the DNR determines that there i! .!!!!. practical alternative method of disposal. 2. Instruction in methods of firefighting. 3. Research in control of fires. 4. Emergency !!! other extraordinary circumstances for !!!I purpose determined to be necessary .!:!v the DNR. · 5. Disposal of landscape waste resulting from land clearing other than residential and agricultural waste. 6. Recognized agricultural or horticultural management purposes to maintain !!! increase the quantity !!! quality of agricultural or horticultural production. 7. When jurisdictional DNR written permission i! not applicable, the Code Official shall give written permission only after !! has been determined that approved fire safety requirements and emission standards are to be met. Add section 408 Smoke detectors in leased !!! rental residential units. 1. Applicability. The ~ of each residential rental unit shall install. smoke detectors and/or fire suppression systems prior to the occupancy of said dwelling unit in compliance with the building and fire codes of the City of Jefferson in effect at the date of occupancy. 2. Date of Installation. The ~ of each existing dwelling unit that i! not at the effective date of this subsection required to be protected .!:!v ! smoke detector !!! fire suppression system shall install smoke detectors!!§. required .!:!v this subsection within three months of the effective date of this subsection. 3. Location of Detectors. The ~ of each existing dwelling shall install at least ~ smoke detector within each sleeping ~ In all dwelling units, the owner shall install ! smoke detector outside the bedrooms (unless .!!!! efficiency apartment), within the immediate vicinity of the sleeping area(s). An ~ subject to this subsection shall install each smoke detector on the ceiling at ! minimum of four inches from the side wall to the ~ edge of the detector !!! !!!! ! wall located four to twelve inches from the ceiling to the 1m! of the detector and within fifteen feet of all !QQ!!!! used for sleeping purposes, with not less than ~ detector ~ level containing ! habitable !!!!!!!! and in the basement !!! cellar. The smoke detector shall not be installed in dead air space, such !!§. where the ceiling meets the wall. Where one or more sleeping !!!l!!! are located !!!! ! level above the cooking and living area, the smoke detector for such sleeping !!!l!!! shall be placed at the 1m! of the stairway. An\ ~ shall also install not less than ~ smoke detector !!!! the uppermost ceiling, not less than four inches from !!!I wall. !!! !!!! ! wall. located four to twelve inches from the uppermost ceiling of all interior stairwells. For good cause shown, the Fire Chief !!! his or her designated department representatives may modify the location requirements of this subsection. 4. ~ of Detector. The ~ shall install ! smoke detector which !! capable of sensing visible !!! invisible particles of combustion and emitting .!!!! audible signal and may be hard wired directly to the building power ~ with battery backup, or may be powered .!:!v self- monitored battery only !f not technically feasible to install hard wired units in existing units. The smoke detector shall comply with all the specifications of the Underwriters Laboratories, Inc. Standard UL217 (Standard for Safety-Single and Multiple Stations Smoke Detectors) 2nd Edition October~ 1978 !!§.revised May 12, 1983 !!! any recognized standard laboratory testing that certifies the detector meets the requirement of National Fire Protection Association (NFPAl Standards 72E and 74. Smoke detectors shall bear the label of ! nationally recognized standards testing laboratory that indicates thaf the smoke detectors have been tested and listed under the requirement of UL217 2nd Edition or NFPA 72Eand74. · Bill-Page 3 Editor's note: Deleted language shown t!His. Added language shown thus. ~· Duties of Owner and Occupant. !! shall be the responsibility of the !!lY!!£! to ~ and mstall Q!!.!! continuing basis all required detectors. The !!lY!!£! shall be responsible for testing and maintaining detectors in common stairwells.!! shall be the responsibility of the tenant to provide and maintain functional batteries after initial installation for each detector, to test and maintain detectors within dwelling units, and to notify the !!lY!!£! !!! authorized agent in writing of !!.!!Y deficiencies. The ~ shall be responsible for providing each tenant with written information regarding detector testing and maintenance. The owner shall provide notice to the occupant of the respective duties of the parties and the potential penalties for violation of the subsection. The !!lY!!£! shall either: 1. Post .!! notice which ~ ~ 112 inches .!2!.!! inches !!! larger inside the rental unit in .!! conspicuous space, or 2. Include a notice provision in the lease agreement, or 3. Provide notice in separate agreement or addendum to lease !f the !!lY!!£! chooses to .P!!! the notice in the lease !!! in .!! separate agreement, the notice shall be in at least 14 point~ The notice shall be prepared in duplicate and shall be signed and dated bY the occupant. One £QPY shall be given to the occupant and ~ £QPY shall be kept on file bY the !!lY!!£! and this £QPY shall be available for inspection .!2!. the Fire Chief!!! his !!! her agent between 2 !ill!: and 1 p.m. Monday through Friday. At .!! minimum the notice shall include the items ~set out in the following: NOTICE OF DUTIES OF OWNER AND OCCUPANT RELATING TO SMOKE DETECTORS ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON REQUIRE THE FOLLOWING OF THE OWNER AND OCCUPANT OF THIS RENTAL UNIT: OWNER THE OWNER SHALL SUPPLY AND INSTALL ALL REQUIRED DETECTORS. THE OWNER SHALL MAINTAIN AND TEST ALL DETECTORS IN COMMON STAIRWELLS. THE OWNER SHALL PROVIDE OCCUPANT WITH WRITTEN INFORMATION REGARDING DETECTOR TESTING AND MAINTENANCE. OCCUPANT THE OCCUPANT SHALL PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN BATTERIES FOR THE DETECTORS. THE OCCUPANT SHALL TEST AND MAINTAIN DETECTORS WITHIN DWELLING UNITS. THE OCCUPANT SHALL NOTIFY OWNER IN WRITING IN CASE OF DEFICIENCY OF DETECTOR. PENALTY IT IS UNLAWFUL FOR ANY PERSON TO REMOVE BATTERIES OR IN ANYWAY MAKE SMOKE DETECTORS INOPERABLE. VIOLATION OF THIS ORDINANCE MAY BE PUNISHABLE BY A FINE NOT EXCEEDING $5oo.Oo'OR IMPRISONMENT FOR A PERIOD NOT EXCEEDlNG THREE MONTHS. Biii-Page4 Editor's note: Deleted language shown tlms. Added language shown thus. 6. Enforcement and Inspection. The Fire Chief or his Q! her designated department representatives shall have jurisdiction to inspect dwelling units for the installation of @Y smoke detector required to be installed under this subsection Q! any other ordinance. Said inspections may be held during reasonable daylight hours. !f !! unit .i! found to be in noncompliance, owner shall be notified that he Q! she has 48 hours to gtl the unit in compliance. Notice of noncompliance to the occupant of the unit shall be posted inside the unit. !f after 48 hours the building !§. still not in compliance !! shall be posted !! uninhabitable and shall remain ~ posted until re-inspected for full compliance with this subsection. 7. Tampering.!! shall be unlawful for !!!Y person to remove batteries Q! in any way make smoke detectors inoperable. 8. Noncomplying Units. !! shall be unlawful for an owner to lease!! noncomplying unit. 9. Penalty : A violation of this code shall be punishable !!v the standard penalty authorized in Section 1-13 of the Code of the City of Jefferson. Add section 503.1.2.1 Fire Lanes. 1. The Fire Chief may designate fire lanes Q!! private and public property. Fire lanes may be established Q!! driveways and ~ roads required !!v City Code sections applicable to the property in question, provided that fire lanes may not be established Q!! property containing one-or two-family residential dwellings. 2. Upon notice !!v the Fire Chief of designation of !! fire lane, !! shall be the !!!!tv. of the owner, occupant, Q! his agent, of the premises upon which the fire lane has been designated, to identify the location of fire lane Q!! the owner's property. Add Section 503.3.1 Details. 1. The fire lane shall be identified !!v placing!! sign at each end of the fire lane in accordance with section 503.1 and !!v marking the pavement and/or curb in accordance with 503.3.2. The Fire Chief may permit the property ~ to designate !!v only one of those methods !f he finds there!§.!! hardship in identification !!v both methods. 2. !f!! property~ disagrees with the determination of the Fire Chief as to the location of the Fire Lane Q! determination Q!! !! request for !! hardship, the property owner may seek judicial review of the decision to the Circuit Court pursuant to Chapter 536 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri. 3. Signs designating fire lanes shall comply with the Manual Q!! Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Such signs shall be rectangular in shape with !! white background and red letters or yellow, stating "NO PARKING: FIRE LANE". 4. The signs described in subsection 3 of this section shall be posted in the following manner: 1. At each end of!! fire lane which exceeds thirty (30) feet in length with signs that £!!..!! be read from each direction; 2. Midway between the ends of!! fire lane less than thirty (30) feet in length with the signs to be posted to the right of the traffic way and to be legible from the roadway. Add Section 503.3.2 Curbs. 1. Curbs .(Qr pavement !f there lli !!Q curbs) in !! fire lane shall be painted with !! stripe at least three Q} inches wide. 2. The paint to be used in complying with subsection 1 of this section shall be yellow Q! red in color. 3. The yellow Q! red striping marking !! fire lane shall not be !! part .!!f, and shall be distinctly different from, any other restricted parking striping used in the ill! of the fire lane. Bill-Page 5 Editor's note: Deleted language shown tffi!s. Added language shown thus. 4. The curb m: pavement shall include .!!. rectangular shape with .!!. white m: red letters stating "NO PARKING :FIRE LANE.:::. Substitute the following for Section 507.5.1 Where required. Fire hydrant spacing: In the districts designated RU, RC, RS-1, RS-2, RS-3, RS-4. RD. RA-1, and RA-2 ~ the City zoning ordinance, tire hydrants shall be six hundred (600) feet apart along any given street, unless .!!. block between two intersecting streets .!! longer than four hundred (400) feet but less than six hundred (600) feet. In all other districts designated in such zoning ordinance, tire hydrants shall be three hundred (300) feet apart along !!!!! given street. In!!! .!!.nl.!!. in the RU, RC, RS-1, RS-2, RS-3, RS-4, RD. RA-1,!!! RA-2 districts which.!!. non-residential.!!§£ exists, the three hundred (300) foot spacing requirement shall .!!Pl!!v:. Add sections to 507.5.2 through 507.5.4.7: 507.5.2.1 Hydrant.!!§£ approval: A person shall not use or operate !!!!! tire hydrant intended for .!!§£ of the tire department for tire suppression purposes unless such person first ~ the permission of the code official and the water company having jurisdiction. This section shall not .!!.PP!I to the .!!§£ of such hydrants ~.!!.person employed bL, and authorized to make such .!!§£ bL, the water company having jurisdiction. 507.5.4.1 Obstructing tire hydrants: I! shall be unlawful !lli, ~ the erection of .!!. fence, placement of .!!. living, dead, or imitation plants, m: placement of !!!!! decorative device, to obscure from view. damage, deface, obstruct or restrict the access to!!!!! tire hydrant or!!!!! tire department connection for the pressurization suppression systems, including tire hydrants and tire department connections that m located in public m: private streets and ~ lanes, m:!!!!. private propertv. 507.5.4.2 Notice of violation: The code official shall issue notices of violations of section 507.5.4 to any property ~ in violations of said section. The notice shall contain .!!. description of the material(s) found to be .!!. violation, .!!. direction to remove the material(s) within fifteen @ days after mailing of the notice, and .!!. ~of section 507 .4. 507.5.4.3 Removal of materials: Obstructions or encroachments that constitute a violation of 507.5.4 m declared to be.!!. nuisance and may be abated as set forth in Chapter 21 of the City Code. 507 .5.4.4 Duty to maintain: I! shall be the duty of the ~ of the propertv on which .!!. tire hydrant m: tire department connection for the pressurization = suppression systems .!! located to maintain the propertv surrounding such hydrant m: connection in such .!!. manner .!!§.to comply with section 507.5.4. 507.5.7 Fire Hydrant Construction: Any tire hydrant installed for private m: public use shall conform to the specifications of the water company having jurisdiction. Any such hydrant shall be right-hand opening, with two, two and one-half inch outlets. and one, four and !!!!,!t half inch outlets, and shall be supplied ~ .!!. water main of .sufficient size to provide tire protection. Add section 806.5 806.5 Exterior Combustible Landscape Mulch Materials: Egress doors shall be free of combustible materials for .!!. minimum distance of 20 feet from the centerline of the entrance. This applies to .wm:. construction and remodels. Add section 906.11: 906.11 Portable Fire Extinguishers: Fire extinguishers sliall meet m: exceed Factory Mutual Global m: Underwriter's Laboratory specifications. Delete section 1103.5.1 in its entirety. Bill-Page 6. Editor's note: Deleted language shown tffi:ls. Added language shown thus. Add Section 5607.16 through 5607.24 5607.16 Permit Application: Application will be submitted five ill working days in advance before ! ~g permit will be issued. Permit applicants shall provide: 1. Plan explaining ill! estimated number of blasts and when the .iQ!! !§. projected to be completed. 2. A site plan indicating location and number of magazines. a. Bunkers, if required b. Distance to adjacent buildings and L Q! structures c. Material Safety Data Sheets shall be provided for all materials used on the .iQ!! site. d. Documentation of blasters certification. 3. A blasting contractor failing to .!!.PP!Y for blasting permits Q!. found blasting without ! permit will be subject to fines as set forth in Section 1-13 of the Citv Code, plus the cost of! blasting permit. 4. Blasting contractors will provide one of the following to the fire department. a. Approved site plan. b. Approved grading permit and/or approved building permit. 5607.17 Certification: Blasters Certification shall be required of all blasters. All blasters must obtain certification .!!! ! blaster from the Missouri Limestone Producers Association !MLP AI or equivalent. All blasters certification will be provided to the Fire Department and kept !!.!! file. 5607.18 Insurance: The blasting contractor shall provide ! "Certificate of Insurance" for special blasting liability insurance coverage, in the amount of not less than Three million dollars [$3,000,000.00). Certificate of Insurance shall show the "City of Jefferson" .!!! ! "Certificate Holder". 5607.19 Signage: Proper signage shall be set on all streets, roads Q! highways declaring "Blasting Area" and "Shut Off Two-way Radios" !not applicable when non-electric caps are used), within five hundred (500! feet of the blast site. 5607.20 Seismographs: Minimum of !!!!.£ ill seismograph shall be Q!! all blasting sites. Additional seismographs may be required !ll:, the Fire Official. Seismic readings shall not exceed 1.5PS [inch rurr second). Sound levels shall not exceed 130 db at the Seismic site. Seismic readings and copies of blasting logs shall be kept !!.!! record !ll:, ~ blasting contractor for one year for review if necessary !ll:. the fire official. 5607.21 Pre-Blast Surveys: Blasters shall conduct ! pre-blast survey when blasting within three hundred !3001 feet of !!!Y habitable structure, well, road, street Q!. highway. 5607.22 Written Notice: Written notice shall be delivered to all property owner/managers within pre-blast survey~ Notice shall contain: Blasting contractor's name, address and phone number, beginning and ending dates, approximate blasting times, blasting location and .lli!!tv for whom work !§. being done. Written notice will be delivered five ill days in advance before blasting. 5607.23 Warnings/Blasting: 1. The blasting contractor shall be responsible for insuring that the~!§. visually inspected and made clear of people and/or animals. 2. Warnings shall be sounded as follows: Bill-Page 7 Editor's note: Deleted language shown tim&. Added language shown thus. 3. Three IJ1 five ill to ten I.!ill second soundings from ! siren, air horn Q! other approved warning device, with minimum sound level of 125 db at one hundred 11001 feet, shall be sounded. 4. Wait! full thirty [301 seconds. 5. Sound another five ill to ten I.!ill second sounding. 6. Immediately followed !!Y! voice command from!!! amplified bullhorn, .!!! equivalent. 7. Detonation shall follow. 8. An "all clear", voice command shall be given after blast and when blast~!§. safe to enter for inspection. 5607.24 Permit Fee: Permit fee for blasting within the City of Jefferson will be~ specified in Appendix Y of the City Code of the City of Jefferson. Add Section 5610: GENERAL 5610.1 Scope: The manufacture, sale and ~ of fireworks is prohibited within the jurisdiction. The display Q! discharge of fireworks shall comply with the requirements of this article. 5610.2 Permit required: A permit shall be obtained from the Jefferson City Fire Department for the display or discharge of fireworks, except for activity allowed under Sec. 5610. 5610.3 Permit applications: Application for permits shall be made in writing at least 15 days in advance of the date of the display .!!! discharge of fireworks. The possession and ~ of fireworks for such display shall be lawful under the terms and conditions approved with the permit and for such display shall be lawful under the terms and conditions approved with the permit and for that purpose only. A permit granted hereunder shall not be transferable, not shall !!!Y such permit be extended beyond the dates set out therein. Add Section 5611: USE, DISPLAY AND DISCHARGE 5611.1 General: !! shall be! violation of this code for !!!Y person to store,~ or explode !!!Y fireworks, except as provided in the rules and regulations issued !!Y the Jefferson City Fire Department for the granting of permits for supervised public displays of fireworks !!Y the jurisdiction, fair associations, amusement parks and other organization. Every such public display and private non-projectile fireworks display shall be supervised !!Y an adult permit holder and shall be handled !!Y !!! approved, competent operator. The fireworks shall be arranged, located, discharged .!!! fired in ! manner that, in the opinion of the Jefferson City Fire Department, will not be! hazard to the property or endanger any person. 5611.2 Bond for display: The permittee shall furnish ! bond in !!! amount deemed adequate !!Y the Jefferson City Fire Department for the payment of all damages which may be caused either to ! person or persons Q! to property !!Y reason of the permitted display, and arising from any acts of the permittee, the permittee's agents, employees or subcontractors. 5611.2.1 Disposal of unfired fireworks: Unfired fireworks and trash that remain after the display!§. concluded shall be immediately disposed of in !!! approved, safe manner. 5611.3 Exemptions: Nothing in this article shall be construed to prohibit !!!Y wholesaler, dealer or jobber to sell at wholesale such fireworks ~ m not herein prohibited, or the sale . of !!!Y kind of fireworks provided the ~ m to be shipped directly out of state, Q! the ~ of fireworks !!Y railroads or other transportation agencies for signal purposes or illumination, or the sale or ~ of blank cartridges for ! show Q! theater, Q! for signal or ceremonial purposes in athletics Q! sports, Q! for u'se !!Y military organizations. Such wholesalers, dealers and jobbers shall store their supplies of fireworks in accordance with Chapter 56. Bill-Page 8 Editor's note: Deleted language shown tffils. Added language shown thus. 5611.4 Seizure of fireworks: The Jefferson City Fire Department shall seize, take, remove or ~ to be removed at the expense of the owner, all stocks of fireworks that are offered !!! exposed for display!!! sale,!!! m stored!!! held in violation of this article. Add Section 5612. 5612. Permitted Possession and Uses. Notwithstanding !!!!.Y. other provisions of section 5608, the following shall be permitted. 1. Possession and use of Class !! fireworks. 2. Transportation of fireworks through the City. 3. Possession and use of Class~ fireworks Q!! private property of five~~!!.[~ All permitted~ of fireworks under this section must~ from June 15th through July 8th, or December 31st through January lst 2 and within the hours of~!:.!!!.:. and 10 p.m., except for the 4th of July and New Year's Eve when the hours will be extended until midnight. (Ord. No. II69I, §I, I-13-92; Ord. No. 11704, § 1, 2-3-92; Ord. No. I4829, § 7, 8-1-2011; Ord. No. 14841, §I, 9-6-2011; Ord. No. 14974, §I, 5-2I-2012; Ord. No. I5239, §I, 3-3-2014; Ord. No. 15702, § 2, 8-2I-20I7) Section 3. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from 60 calendar days after the date of its passage and approval. Passed: ___________ _ Approved: __________ _ Presiding Officer Mayor Carrie Tergin ATIEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk City Counselor Bill-Page 9 Editor's note: Deleted language shown tlms. Added language shown thus. Cape Girardeau Population: 39,566 https://www. visitca pe .com/discover/mu rals/ No Distance Restrictions Mural Cities All public art acquisitions and proposals must be evaluated by the Public Art Committee working in consultation with designated City staff to provide recommendations to the City Council for final approval. Chillicothe Population: 9,162 https://www.chillicothecity.org/community/attractions-and-entertainment/pages/city-murals No Distance Restrictions Chillicothe's mural project came about as a joint effort among the city, the Rotary Foundation, and Chillicothe Development Corporation . A committee has been formed to address the role of murals in Chillicothe and choose future projects . The committee consists of Main Street and Rotary Foundation personnel, members of the Grand River Historical Society, and other community members interested in the project. 17+ Murals Cuba, Missouri Population: 3,290 https ://cubamomurals.com/#murals No distance restrictions All mural projects are through committee, Viva Cuba, Inc who works with city staff. 12+ Murals Hannibal, MO Population: 17,320 Hannibal Arts Council approves and handles all mural requests. (Michael Gaines) 11+ Murals Joplin, Missouri Population: 50,386 http://www.joplinmo.org/842/Arts-Culture https ://con nect2 culture. o rg/ arts-a nd -cu ltu re/pu b lie-art/ No Distance restrictions All mural projects are through Historic Preservation Commission, Joplin Regional Artists Coalition, and TANK public art group then presented to city council for final approval. Kansas City, MO Population: 486,404 https://www.kcmo.gov/city-hall/departments/general-services/municipal-art-commission/kcmo-public- art No distance restrictions All mural requests go through the Municipal Art Commission (James Martin) Louisiana, MO Population: 3,264 No Distance Restrictions Section 405.350 Design Guidelines states: Artwork or murals must go through the Louisiana Mural Association. (Ron Allely) 24+ Murals Newton County, MO Population: 58,236 http:Uwww.newtoncountytourism .org/index.php No distance restrictions Newton County Tourism Council approves and handles all mural requests 18+ murals Frankfort, KY Population: 27,000 No Distance Restrctions Murals are approved by Planning & Community Development Department Mural Series: ORDINANCE NO.8, 2019 SERIES b.Nou-conuuercial speech shall no t be regulat ed as signa ge. c.The uame o r signature of the mural art ist ma y be placed o n th e mmal bur shall be limite<i iu scale. 3. To the extent no constinnio nal protection is pro vided under tederal or state la w. mma ls shall not contain o bscenity. fighting words. detinuation. chi ld pomography. pe1jmy . blackmaiL inc itement to uuruinent lawless action. true threat s o f bodily injmy or death. or so licitation to commit crimes. -1 . :1\l ura l Loc;nion : fl.:\hu"llls sha ll not be located on the principal fa ~ade(s) of n buil ding . I\ I ura ls may be located on o ther ti1cades of the lmild il!g including the si de . rear. or alley facing tacact.:s . lllnra ls propo sed o n the pri11cipa l fa~ade of buildings shall be reYiewecl by the :\Jill . b.Iu accordance \\"ith t he CB District Des ign Gu idelines gho st signs >ha ll not be painted owr. c .:\fmnls may be located o n a building"s flat roof but oth erwise sha ll no t be p laced aboYe the buildi11g ·s roof line or exteud.project beyond ean~s. pmapets or the side s o f a bu il d ing . 5. :tvfural Relation ship to A.rch.itectnra l Feanu ·es: a.J\Imals shall not cover o r detract limn architectura l te atnre s. Eaves. co mices and o ther archit ecmral teamres shall keep theu· charac ter and remain pa uned to match the re st o f similar architecnu-a l feanu·es on the bu ildil1g . 6. Non-Sm·fuce ap plied Mmals: a ._-\ mmal that ha s been applied to ano ther surface to be hung on a building shall be insta lled in a mallller which Lees Summit Population: 97 ,275 No Distance Restrict ions Sec . 21-100.-Mu ral standards . B. Mural placement. 1. Murals shall be allowed in all commercial districts of the City. 2. Murals shall not be permitted on the primary fagade . A primary fagade is defined, for purposes of this section , as the building elevation that faces the adjacent street right-of-way and is the primary customer entrance . Buildings located on a block corner with the primary customer entrance located diagonally at the building corner to bo t h intersecting streets shall be considered to have two (2) primary fagades . 3. Murals shall not be allowed on backs of buildings , backing to residential districts . 4 . Mu rals shall not be allowed in non-commercial districts of the City . (Ord . No . 7954, § 1, 9-1-201 6) Sec . 21 -10 1.-Mural pe rmit. A. No mural shall be installed unless written permission is first obtained by the owner of the bu ilding upon which t he mural is to be placed, or the building owner's agent , and a mural permit is obtained from the Directo r of Planning and Codes Administration , or his/her designee . Univer sity City, MO Population: 34,4 98 No dis t ance restr ictions All murals mus t go th rough Municipal Comm issio n on Arts and Letters S eclion 1.20.220. ccep lance of Works of Art. I H.O . 20 I I §2.30.060; P rio r C o d e §2 -1 07; Onl. No . 5453 § l , I I -12 -1984 I A. to work of a 1-t ha ll b co n tract e d fo r or p laced o n pro pe rly of t he City or becom e t h e pro p r ty o f the il y by purc hase, gift o r ot he rwi se, e xc pt for a m us e um or g a ll 1 , un less s uc h wo r k of a rt, o r a d e ig n 01-mod I o f U1 s a m e as r e q ui r e d by t h mun ic ipa l Co mmissio n o n ,<\rls a nd L tte rs , Log the r with t h pmpos d locati o n o f s uc h wo rk o f a rt, s ha ll first h a ,· been s u b m itte d to the Co mmissio n fo r its r co n1m nclat io n to t he City ove mn1 e nt. The te mt "work of arC' as used in t h is C ha p t e r ha ll co m pri se of pa intings , m u ra l decoration , ta in d g lass. ta lu s. b. s ·r e li e fs or oth r c ulptu res, mo nume n ts. fo unta in s. d co ra tiv a rc hes ot· ot he r tn1ct u res o f pe nna ne nt or t e m por ary ha rac te r in te nde d fo r o m a m e nt o r co m me m o ration. o e x.i ling wo r k of a r t in the p os sessio n of the City s ha ll b e r e move d , 1-e lo a te d o r a lte r e d in a ny way w it ho ut b e ing s u b m it t e d t o the Co mmi ss io n for 1·e po1t a nd recomme nda tion . TO: TH R O U GH: F ROM: DATE: RE: DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES MEMORANDUM Public Works & Planning Committee Sonny Sanders , Planning & Protective Services Director Rachel Senzee, Neighborhood Services Supervisor May 5, 2022 Neighborhood Services' Grants Status Report Due to the increased amount of federal funding, Neighborhood Services will maintain a standing agenda item to update Council and the Public. The status report will include current projects and subgrant information , pending application statuses , and upcoming funding opportunities . Informational links will also be provided, when available. The in ten t of the grant status report is to : 1. Update t he Public about funding opportunities 2. Give Council the information necessary to provide their respective constituency 3. Provide information to support budgetary decisions Committee Request: None -information only . For questions or comments, please contact Rachel Senzee at rsenzee@jeffcitymo .org or 573-634-6305 . Neig hb o rh oo d Se rvices Gra nts Update Public Works & Planni ng-April7, 2022 Curren t Project St atus: Economic Development Administration (EDA)-DR MSP Infrastructure $3,099,595 Total Project Cost Current Timeline: • Work on the developer's agreement is underway. Anticipated to go before Counc i l in August . • Programmatic Agreement with SHPO/EDA-ASAP o SHPO recommended getting MSP listed on National Register before pursuing PA (this may not be feasible) o CMPS is preparing a demolition plan o City staff and the proposed developer are preparing terms of mitigation for the loss of cultural resources • A formal grant amendment, to reflect updated timelines, will be sent Council once EDA approves • Des ign: February-December 2022 • Construction-January 2023-January 2026 EDA CARES-Ec o nomic Recove ry Pla n ~ $30,00 0 -$70,0 00 (T hrough RPC) Current Timeline : • Complete planning document by December 31 , 2022 • Working with JCREP and RPC to create a Broadband Infrastructure Plan . A completed plan will i ncentivize broadband providers to build out broadband infrastructure in Cole County. • A request for proposals was sent out by the Mid-MO Regional Planning Commission for the broadband infrastructure plan. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)-Entitlement Funds-PY2022 $300,250 Current Timeline : • Spend funds by December 31, 2022 • Projects include: o Down Payment Assistance (met goal) o Emergency Home Repair o Voluntary Demolitions o Adams/Hickory St . Sidewalk project-contributing ~$313,000 • Impediments for Fair Housing plan is required to be updated every five years . RKG is interested conducting the work. This may be a change order to the existing Housing Needs Assessment work. CDBG-CARES (CV)-Childcare Facility Grants-$413,435 Current Timeline : • Funds need to be spent by December 31 , 2022 • All funds have been subgranted to 11 childcare facilities for: childcare subsidies, overhead costs, or small construction p rojects t o prepare, prevent, or respond to COVID -19 • $82 ,687 for ad min (staff time and Housing Needs Assessment) • $330,748 subgrants CDBG-Disaster Recovery (DR)-Housing Recovery Activities $7,059,000 • Staff are currently working on program proposals (now due July 2022) for: o Planning o Housing Counseling o Acquisition/Demo o New Construction-Single Family Homes o Multi-Family Construction-New/Rehabilitation o Down Payment Assistance o Homeowner Rehabilitation o lnfrastructu re o Housing Incentive for Replacement • Required to meet with County and other community stakeholders within the 65101 zip code. Meeting will be arranged in the coming weeks. • Due to DED's new updates, staff are working toward an advance call fo r proposals for the Multi-Family Construction program • Once proposals are accepted by the State-OED, next steps are: o Develop applications and guidelines for each program o Determine scoring/award process o Host application workshops o Award grants before 2023 construction season (goal, not requirement) Historic Preservation Fund (HPF) HPF Resurvey Historic East-$23,000 Total Project Cost • Consultant, David Taylor, is actively working on the project • Deliverables are due July 2022 HPF Lower Jefferson Survey-$23,000 Total Project Cost • Consultant, David Taylor, is actively working on the project • Deliverables are due July 2022 HPF Historic Context-$50,000 Total Project Cost • Consultant, Owen Eastlake, meeting with Historic Preservation Commission, SHPO, and staff February 8, 2022 • Deliverables are due July 2022 HPF Structural Assessment-$28,000 • Funded, waiting on award documents • Project would consist of structural assessments for: o 413 E Capitol o 419 E Capitol o 429 E Capitol o 114 Jackson o 517 E Capitol Paul Bruhn Revitalization Grant-$675,000 • Eligible property owners (34) will receive a letter, informational flyer, and a copy of their 2020 structural assessment in the coming weeks (waiting on NPS approval of content) • Next steps include : o Develop applications and guidelines o Determine scoring/award process (likely HPC) o Host application workshops o Award grants before 2023 construction season (goal, not requirement) • Grant must be completed by September 30, 2024 State CDBG-CV Cole County EMS -$2,000,000 • Received award notifications; still waiting on award documents • Building an EMS facility on the corner of Adams and E. McCarty • City is lead applicant • Staff monitor and provide oversite • Administration for City staff-$45,000 State CDBG-CV-$2,000,000 • Not funded : Two-Way Monroe Street-$1,250,240 federal, $3.4 million total project cost • Funded, waiting on award documents: Compass Health Planning-$100,000 o Market analysis focused on special needs and vulnerable populations • Funded, award accepted : Transformational Housing-$544,000 o Rehabilitate 101 Jackson into transitional housing • Administration-$105,760 (staff time) Pending Applications: Histo ric Prese rva t ion Fund • Design Gu idelines-$50,000 o Guide allows for historic preservation, new development, and redevelopment • West Main Phase Ill Architectural Survey Upcoming Opportun ities: RAISE Grants -D ue April, 2023 • Funds up to $25 million in infrastructure projects • 20% match, potentially less depending on project • Opportunity to fund identified projects in : o Metropolitan Transportation Plan (pg. 102) Choice Neighborhood Planning Grant -Due Jul y 202 2 • Funds up to $450,000 for a two-year neighborhood Transformation Plan • Transformation Plan implementation may be then pursued fo r up to $50 million Department of Economic Development-American Rescue Plan Act Programs -Open July 2022 (tentative) • Local ARPA funds can be used as match forDED ARPA programs All things Bipartisan Infrastructure Law • Link above includes timelines and local eligibility requirements