HomeMy Public PortalAbout11/07/2012 CCMMEDINA CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 7, 2012
The City Council of Medina, Minnesota met in regular session on November 7, 2012 at
7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Chambers. Mayor Crosby presided.
I. ROLL CALL
Members present: Crosby, Pederson, Martinson, Siitari, and Weir.
Members absent: None.
Also present: City Attorney Ron Batty, City Engineer Tom Kellogg, Planner Dusty
Finke, Public Works Superintendent Steve Scherer, City Administrator Scott Johnson,
and Chief of Police Ed Belland.
I1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
III. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA
The agenda was accepted as presented.
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
A. Approval of the October 16, 2012 Special City Council Meeting Minutes
Crosby referenced the presentation from WSB and confirmed that the options were
simply being presented and no decisions were made.
It was noted under WSB Stormwater, the last sentence of the second paragraph, it
should state, "...agree on a standard of calculations for TMDL's and MS4 regulations
before a project begins." The following paragraph, it should state, "...for local
governments, but difficult to accomplish because they are often on private property."
Moved by Weir, seconded by Siitari, to approve the October 16, 2012 special City
Council meeting minutes as presented. Motion passed unanimously.
B. Approval of the October 16, 2012 Regular City Council Meeting Minutes
It was noted on page two, line 16, it should state, "...recused herself from the issue,
resulting in a lack of a quorum." On page four, line 41, it should state, "...Hackamoro
116..." On page five, line 22, it should state, "...Tree Preservation Ordinance would
highly negatively impact..." On page five, line 42, it should state, "...determine where
the road connection..." On page eight, line nine, it should state, "...regarding
information learned..." On page eight, line 11, it should state, "...neighboring
development in Plymouth to ensure..."
Moved by Weir, seconded by Siitari, to approve the October 16, 2012 regular City
Council meeting minutes as amended. Motion passed unanimously.
C. Approval of the October 23, 2012 Special City Council Meeting Minutes
Crosby suggested that the name of the motel manager be included in the minutes.
Moved by Weir, seconded by Siitari, to approve the October 23, 2012 special City
Council meeting minutes as amended. Motion passed unanimously.
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 1
November 7, 2012
V. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Approve Embedded Systems Renewal for 2013
,B. Approve Snow R ovvaal_Seryices Agreement wi h C� now n L w LLC
C. Approve Master Subscriber Agreement for Minnesota Court Data Services
for Governmental Agencies and Master Subscriber Agreement Amendment
for MPA My Case
D. Approve Inspection Services Agreement with Badger State Inspection, LLC
E. Approve 2013 WSB Rates
F. Release Letter of Credit for Open Systems International, Inc.
G Resolution Ne 2012_78 Receenizine Girl Sceuf Service Unit of Westonka_
v.
Moved by Weir, seconded by Siitari, to approve the consent agenda as amended.
Motion passed unanimously.
B. Approve Snow Removal Services Agreement with Snow `n Lawn LLC
Pederson commented that the proposed increase from the previous provider was only
five dollars and believed it was a shame to lose the service from that local provider over
such a small amount.
Crosby stated that the main difference in price was in snow amounts of over three
inches.
Scherer agreed that there is a difference when the snow accumulates. He noted that
the recommended provider also provides grass cutting services to the City.
Moved by Pederson, seconded by Weir, to approve the Snow Removal Services
Agreement with Snow `n Lawn LLC. Motion passed unanimously.
G. Resolution No. 2012-78 Recognizing Girl Scout Service Unit of Westonka-
Orono for their Centennial Day of Service to the City of Medina
Weir reported that for the 100th anniversary of the Girl Scouts, troops volunteered 2.5
hours of service work such as cleaning drains and raking leaves. She stated that a
large group of Girl Scouts completed projects and she attended the event to assist as
well. She noted that the group did a great job. She read the Resolution aloud and
thanked the Girl Scouts for their efforts.
Moved by Weir, seconded by Martinson, to adopt Resolution No. 2012-78 Recognizing
Girl Scout Service Unit of Westonka-Orono for their Centennial Day of Service to the
City of Medina. Motion passed unanimously.
VI. COMMENTS
A. Comments from Citizens on Items not on the Agenda
Chris Barry, 1822 Morgan Road, expressed his concerns regarding the Hollydale high
voltage line project. He explained that his family had relocated several times because of
work over the past ten years and finally settled into Medina this year. He stated that his
family spent additional funds renovating the home and finally moved in this summer only
to find out a short time later about the Hollydale high voltage project, which is proposed
to run through his property, 100 feet from his home. He noted that he has many
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 2
November 7, 2012
concerns about the proximity to his home and about the safety of his family, including
his two small children. He stated that if he would have known about the project, he
would not have purchased and renovated the home. He asked for the assistance of the
Council in obtaining additional information including specific information in respect to
power outages associated with businesses along the Highway 55 Hamel area, the
number of residents utilizing Xcel power and why this area would have to cover Xcel
customers, the cost of burying the lines, and what would be necessary for the City to
draft an Ordinance, which specifies that power lines must be buried within 300 to 400
feet of homes.
Crosby explained that action is not taken during this portion of the agenda.
Scherer explained the burying of lines was in regard to lines along Medina Road, which
are standard lines, not high voltage.
Crosby stated that the City has gone on record asking that lines be buried when close to
homes. He provided additional information on the Council process in regard to the route
for the Hollydale high voltage project.
Weir referenced the business tours the Council recently completed and noted that
Target has to dump fresh produce when power is lost and advised that situation had
occurred on several occasions. She stated that power has been lost several times at
the Gramercy retirement home and some residents are afraid to ride in the elevator for
fear of being stuck in the elevator when the power goes out. She acknowledged that 300
feet from the power lines is the safe zone to reduce the electromagnetic field.
Mrs. Barry stated that she would like to see a cost analysis done to show the cost for
burying the lines when they are closer than 300 feet to homes.
Weir confirmed that Finke could email some additional information to the Barrys on the
lines proximity to homes on the existing and alternative routes.
Johnson commented that staff does not have expertise on this matter and State
organizations, such as the Public Utilities Commission, manage the process for this
issue.
Crosby suggested that this item be placed on a future agenda to allow for further
discussion.
Weir advised that the open comment period for this issue continues through November
16th, noting that she would be submitting comments.
Johnson explained that this is the second process, the certificate of need, and the first
process, route permit application, has accepted public comment. He noted that the City
would have the option to comment on each portion of the project. He confirmed that the
City could submit a letter once again stating their suggestions and concerns regarding
the project.
Jim Simons, 1862 Morgan Road, congratulated Crosby and the Council on the recent
elections. He clarified that there are two power line projects within the City. He
questioned if the City would be able to create an Ordinance, which states that power
lines must be buried.
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 3
November 7, 2012
Crosby explained the easement issues that could come into play and did not believe that
an Ordinance could be created prior to the 16th
Batty stated that the two projects have different types of power lines and confirmed that
an Ordinance would apply to the smaller voltage line and not the high voltage lines.
Judy Mallett, 2492 Willow Drive, also expressed her concerns with the high voltage lines
proposed under the Hollydale Project.
B. Park Commission
Scherer noted that the Park Commission continues to do long-term planning and
discussed the trail along Willow Drive.
C. Planning Commission
Finke advised that the Commission will meet the following week to hold a public hearing.
He confirmed that a special meeting was held on October 24th to discuss a request from
the Independence Beach area and noted that the request had been tabled and changes
to the applicant's plan were requested.
VII. NEW BUSINESS
A. Lake Minnetonka Cable Commission (LMCC) Update
Johnson provided background information regarding the LMCC and Mediacom. He
reported that the LMCC will be in franchise renewal discussions during 2013, as the
current Agreement expires in December 2013. He explained that the City does not
believe that the current broadband needs are being met by the LMCC and advised of an
offer for service from Mediacom. He explained that when the original Agreement with
LMCC was put in place the needs of the City were simply cable and advised that the
needs of the City now include broadband services. He reviewed the LMCC Mission and
noted that while the statement is great, most residents in Medina do not have access to
cable television. He provided additional information regarding franchise fees and peg
fees and explained the difference between the two types of fees. He reviewed the
statistical information for the City of Medina including the miles served by infrastructure,
the number of homes utilizing cable or internet services, the number of homes not
offered services. He then reviewed the calculations under the Franchise Agreement
used to determine if the area meets the required number of homes for service
installation and the cost to install broadband infrastructure. He noted that the LMCC is
able to collect the franchise fees
Judy Mallett, LMCC representative for the City, stated that most of the City does not
have the chance to see a Mediacom billing statement, as the service is not available in
their area. She explained that Mediacom is required to collect the franchise fees and
disburse those funds to the LMCC. She explained that if a City Franchise is developed,
those funds collected by Mediacom could come back to the City for use in the general
fund, if directed by the City Council. She advised that Mediacom is the eighth largest
cable provider in the country and most of the Franchise Agreements they have are with
cities and not Commissions.
Johnson provided additional information on the amount of franchise fees collected on an
annual basis.
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 4
November 7, 2012
Mallett explained that if the franchise fees were coming directly into the City for the past
13 years, those funds could have been used to build out 22 of the 29 miles that are
currently not serviced by cable or broadband services.
Crosby stated that it is his understanding that if the City did not belong to the LMCC and
wanted to have the Council meetings video recorded, the City would have to pay for the
services from LMCC.
Mallett stated that the City would not necessarily have to do that option. She advised
that most residents of Medina do not have access to the LMCC channels and cannot
watch the meetings live. She advised that the City needs a camera and video capture to
then project the meetings directly onto the City website and noted that the PEG fees
could be used for that purpose.
Johnson provided additional information on the option of a direct City Franchise
Agreement, explained that the City would have control over the approximately $44,000
per year in franchise fees and PEG fees from Mediacom subscribers to address the
cable infrastructure needs of the City. He stated that there would be immediate cable
capital infrastructure investment in Medina with 100 percent build -out within three to five
years. He explained that this could provide an ability to attract competitor
communications providers who had been discouraged by the geographical and legal
complexities of the 17 city consortium. He highlighted additional aspects of the direct
city Franchise Agreement and aspects of the LMCC Agreement that currently do not
match the needs of the City.
Mallett provided insight, noting that the LMCC has not met with representatives from
Mediacom in the past two years and has still not met with Mediacom even though the
existing Agreement expires in December 2013.
Johnson continued to review the concerns with the LMCC Franchise Agreement noting •
that Medina continues to be underserved and the goals of the LMCC do not match with
the desires of the City. He advised that Medina can continue to be a member of the
LMCC or the City can meet with Mediacom in an attempt to develop a direct Franchise
Agreement with the City. He noted that the build out of infrastructure could be much
slower than desired if the City stays with the LMCC and summarized the other
considerations that factor into the discussion. He reviewed a possible timetable and
advised that the Vice President of Mediacom has requested to come to the November
20th Council meeting to further discuss the matter. He advised that broadband is an
essential service that is vital to future development and explained that 100 percent
access is needed for business and residents. He questioned whether the Council would
simply like to stay with LMCC or pursue discussions with Mediacom.
Crosby questioned if Mediacom would have a conflict of interest in pursuing the City with
a direct Franchise Agreement.
Mallett stated that the City reached out to Mediacom and explained that any city
underserviced by the LMCC would have a desire to reach out and explore the option for
building out infrastructure more quickly than the LMCC.
Johnson agreed that the City reached out to Mediacom in attempt to further expand the
infrastructure and noted that the meeting with Mediacom morphed into much more than
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 5
November 7, 2012
expected. He displayed a map of the City, which identified the areas currently serviced
by cable and broadband service as well as the areas not served.
Crosby commented that it appears the new subdivisions that are being built are
obtaining service.
Johnson agreed that those developments meet the density requirements and therefore
the infrastructure is being built, noting that the existing residents are being left out.
Crosby stated that he believed staff and Mallett would be the best people to discuss this
option. He believed that perhaps the LMCC and Mediacom should both have the
opportunity to speak to the City.
Mallett stated that the huge incentive to the direct Franchise Agreement is that
Mediacom would build out the City within three years with no expense to the City and
advised that there is no way the LMCC could do that. She asked the Council to focus
on those incentives that the LMCC cannot meet. She stated that the City has been with
the LMCC for 13 years and has given the organization over $700,000 and that
organization has never spent a penny on the build out of member city infrastructure.
She explained that the LMCC has a budget of $700,000, which is funded on the backs
of the cable subscribers and uses those funds for their equipment and programming.
She stated that while other members in the LMCC desire HD cameras for their City Halls
and on demand programming, Medina is simply asking for service. She stated that
while Medina has an average share of subscribers, the City has no power at the LMCC
table.
Crosby questioned if other cities are seeking this independent route.
Mallett was unsure. She advised that there are five underserviced communities in the
LMCC that gathered earlier this year to discuss providing service. She stated that when
she was appointed as a representative to the LMCC she would have never imagined
that this would be the path she would be leading but advised that the incentives from
Mediacom are huge and the build out of infrastructure is a great benefit to Medina. She
stated that there are hundreds of cities that have direct Agreements with Mediacom and
advised that the organization specializes in smaller cities.
Crosby asked that other direct Franchise Agreements be reviewed to ensure that the
promised build outs occurred in those cities. He confirmed that staff could continue
discussions with Mediacom regarding a direct Franchise Agreement. He asked if the
City has a contractual obligation to the LMCC.
Mallett confirmed that the City does have an obligation to the LMCC but believed that an
exit strategy could be easily agreed upon by both parties. She stated that legal counsel
for the LMCC advised against refusing to let member cities withdraw during the
renegotiation process.
Crosby stated that this issue has gotten back to the LMCC as he received a call from
the Chair of the LMCC the previous day.
Johnson confirmed the direction for staff to move forward in the discussion with
Mediacom regarding the possibility of a direct Franchise Agreement.
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 6
November 7, 2012
Mallett provided additional information regarding the makeup of the LMCC and its
Board.
Crosby confirmed that the gentleman video recording the meeting tonight is an
independent contractor and does not work directly for the LMCC.
VIII. OLD BUSINESS
A. Ordinance No. 539 Regarding Regulations of Wind Energy Conversion
Systems, Solar Equipment, and Geothermal Systems; Amending Chapter 8
of the City Code
Finke provided background information noting that the presentation tonight is a
culmination of several discussions by the Council regarding this subject. He noted that
the suggestions and recommendations made by the Council during the previous review
of the issue had been incorporated into the proposed Ordinance. He highlighted some
of those changes and noted that the suggested changes to solar were also completed.
Crosby questioned if other communities require both a 300 foot setback and a limit to a
50 foot height requirement in rural residential and agriculture. He also questioned if
other communities have banned turbines from residential areas.
Finke did not believe other communities have both regulations, as both regulations
together severely limit the amount of wind able to be collected. He confirmed that some
communities do restrict wind turbines from residential areas. He stated that there are
areas of the City, which would allow up to 100 or 200-foot turbines along highways but
acknowledged that the possible locations are limited.
Clarkson Lindley, 1580 Homestead Trail, stated that he does not believe that wind
turbines should be allowed anywhere within the residential area of Medina to help
preserve the rural aesthetic. He was also concerned with possible litigation that could
come forward.
Crosby stated that the City has come a long way from the original Ordinance and
advised that he is comfortable with the Ordinance as proposed. He commented on the
Orono case.
Batty confirmed that the Orono case was a situation in which the resident installed the
turbine and the City then told the man that he could not have it. He stated that the case
is still being reviewed by the Courts but noted that situation is very unique.
Weir referenced the language regarding color, a color consistent with the surrounding
area, such as white or light grey, and asked that the specific colors be removed.
Finke confirmed that the specific colors can be removed so the language simply states a
color consistent with the surrounding area.
Moved by Weir, seconded by Martinson, to adopt Ordinance No. 539 Amending Chapter
8 of the Code of Ordinances Regarding Wind Energy Conversion Systems. Motion
passed unanimously.
1. Resolution No. 2012-79 Authorizing Publication of Ordinance No.
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 7
November 7, 2012
539 by Title and Summary
Moved by Weir, seconded by Siitari, to adopt Resolution No. 2012-79 Authorizing
Publication of Ordinance No. 539 by Title and Summary. Motion passed
unanimously.
Batty noted that staff would bring back an action item ending the moratorium for Council
approval at the next meeting.
VII. NEW BUSINESS (Continued)
B. Job Description Amendments
Johnson reported that staff has been working to amend the job descriptions of City
employees to better reflect the additional responsibilities handled by the employees and
highlighted the proposed amendments to the specific job descriptions. He
recommended that the Council approve the proposed job description amendments to
better reflect the responsibilities handled.
Crosby expressed concern with the possibility that elevating the job title could result in
the employee feeling like they are now above certain responsibilities. He stated that the
City has maintained a stable staffing level for the past seven years and did not want the
employees to feel that additional employees would then be hired.
Scherer stated that this is simply for the job descriptions and does not result in pay
increases or less responsibility but to more accurately reflect the job.
Crosby also questioned if changing Scherer from Superintendent to Director would
result in the City no longer needing a consultant.
Scherer commented that an engineer will still be needed and that will not change. He
also suggested a few grammatical changes were needed for the Water and Sewer
Operator description.
Moved by Weir, seconded by Martinson, to approve the changes to the job descriptions
for the Assistant Finance Director, Public Works Director, Public Works Maintenance
Worker — Water and Sewer Operator, and Administrative Assistant — Planning and
Public Works positions. Motion passed unanimously.
IX. CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT
Johnson advised of a draft letter for Hennepin County Commissioner Jeff Johnson, as
directed, and stated that staff will send the letter if the Council is comfortable with it.
Weir referenced the comment added by Crosby and questioned if that item should be
included. She advised that Jeff Johnson will be holding a public meeting in early
December that interested parties could attend. She agreed that the letter should be
mailed.
Johnson confirmed Council approval for sending the letter. He advised that the City did
not receive the Hennepin County sports facility grant recently applied for.
Weir expressed concern that the original grant of $25,000 could be lost if the City does
not move forward.
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 8
November 7, 2012
Scherer noted that he would look into the deadline and possibilities to light just one field
at this time with the grant funds already received.
Crosby suggested applying for a smaller amount as he noted that perhaps the grant is
being denied because of the large amount.
Johnson provided an update regarding a grant being applied for by the Loretto and
Hamel fire departments for a consultant to help implement the feasibility plan.
Crosby confirmed that the City Hall was adequately staffed for voting.
Johnson thanked staff members for their work on the 2012 elections. Weir commended
staff for their efforts as her experience with the polling process went smoothly.
X. MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Weir asked for additional information regarding the turn onto Highway 55 from 116.
Crosby advised of the special meeting that will take place on November 14, 2012 to
certify the election results.
Moved by Weir, seconded by Siitari, to change the time of the special meeting for
Wednesday, November 14, 2012 to 6:00 p.m. Motion passed unanimously.
XI. APPROVAL TO PAY THE BILLS
Moved by Weir, seconded by Siitari, to approve the bills, EFT 001834E-001847E for
$47,889.96, and order check numbers 038928-038988 for $191,839.54, and payroll EFT
504556-504581 for $44,343.42. Motion passed unanimously.
XII. ADJOURN
Moved by Weir, seconded by Siitari, to adjourn the meeting at 9:03 p.m. Motion
passed unanimously.
Attest:
4512 T.M. Crosby, Jr., Mayor
Scott Johnson, City Administrator
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 9
November 7, 2012
A
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 10
November 7, 2012
ORDER CHECKS October 17, 2012 - November 1, 2012
038928 LEASEBURG, RENE $150.00
038929 MN DEPT OF LABOR/INDUSTRY $4,256.06
038930 SELECT ACCOUNT $83.00
038931 ADAM'S PEST CONTROL INC $112.15
038932 BERGERSON CASWELL INC. $9,000.00
038933 BURNHAM TREE EXPERTS $3,599.99
038934 CARLSON BUILDING SERVICES $494.92
038935 CARNEY, ERIN $250.00
038936 HAKANSON ANDERSON $500.00
038937 CITY OF MAPLE PLAIN $2,148.35
038938 MARCO (LEASE) $510.50
038939 MARCO INC $533.98
038940 MEDINA EDUCATION INSTITUTE $305.00
038941 METRO WEST INSPECTION $7,596.02
038942 MN DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH $150.00
038943 ON SITE SANITATION $293.90
038944 SPRINT $1,215.28
038945 TIMESAVER OFFSITE $157.50
038946 WALJI, SHABIR/SABIRA $205.00
038947 ALLSTAR ELECTRIC $688.25
038948 AMERICAN ENGINEERING $3,600.00
038949 AMERICAN PUBLIC $205.00
038950 ANCHOR PAPER COMPANY $465.44
038951 BOYER FORD TRUCKS INC $2,677.17
038952 DOBOS $14.50
038953 DOWNHOLE WELL SERVICES LLC $1,250.00
038954 DPC INDUSTRIES INC $2,639.15
038955 ELITE CLEANERS & $6.41
038956 ESS BROS. & SONS, INC $86.57
038957 FEHN COMPANIES INC $1,710.71
038958 GROVE NURSERY CENTER INC $986.67
038959 H & L MESABI COMPANY $1,995.81
038960 HAKANSON ANDERSON $24,099.36
038961 HAMEL LIONS CLUB $240.00
038962 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD $6,934.02
038963 HENRYS WATERWORKS INC $471.01
038964 HEWLETT PACKARD CO $998.12
038965 INTERSTATE BATTERY SYSTEM $989.87
038966 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES $94.32
038967 KELLY'S WRECKER SERVICE INC $465.46
038968 KENNEDY & GRAVEN CHARTERED $24,419.80
038969 LANO EQUIPMENT INC $32.28
038970 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES $515.00
038971 LORETTO VOLUNTEER $19,830.29
038972 LUTHER BROOKDALE CHRYSLER $4,725.68
038973 MN HWY SAFETY & RESEARCH $2,316.00
038974 MN STATE AUDITOR $125.00
038975 NELSON ELECTRIC MOTOR $2,439.54
038976 OFFICE DEPOT $188.78
038977 PAINT -A -LOT $150.00
038978 QUALITY RESOURCE GROUP INC $568.38
038979 ROLF ERICKSON ENTERPRISES $6,638.84
038980 SNOW N LAWN $4,400.00
038981 STREICHER'S $162.87
038982 SUN PRESS & NEWSPAPERS $414.68
038983 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR $155.93
038984 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED $812.04
038985 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER $2.11
038986 WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE $172.22
038987 WSB & ASSOCIATES $19,500.51
038988 XCEL ENERGY $22.090.10
Total Checks $191,839.54
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 11
November 7, 2012
Electronic Payments October 17, 2012 — November 1, 2012
001834E ELAN FINANCIAL SERVICE $2,552.70
001835E PITNEY BOWES $123.00
001836E AFLAC $470.34
001837E XCEL ENERGY $12,482.09
001838E MINNESOTA, STATE OF $1,813.00
001839E PR PERA $11,815.58
001840E PR FED/FICA $11,759.45
001841E PR MN Deferred Comp $1,000.00
001842E PR STATE OF MINNESOTA $2,845.91
001843E SELECT ACCOUNT $542.08
001844E CITY OF MEDINA $18.00
001845E FARMERS STATE BANK OF $20.00
001846E EXXONMOBIL $235.39
001847E DELTA DENTAL $2.212.42
Total Checks $47,889.96
PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSIT October 24, 2012
504556 BARNHART, ERIN A $1,596.14
504557 BELLAND, EDGAR J. $2,207.85
504558 BOECKER, KEVIN D. $2,314.95
504559 CONVERSE, KEITH A. $2,059.52
504560 DINGMANN, NAN W. $2,113.46
504561 DOMINO, CHARMANE $1,483.34
504562 FINKE, DUSTIN D $2,023.97
504563 GALLUP, JODI M. $1,420.17
504564 GLEASON, JOHN M $1,703.79
504565 GREGORY, THOMAS $2,301.61
504566 HALL, DAVID M $1,972.99
504567 JESSEN, JEREMIAH S. $2,150.80
504568 JOHNSON, SCOTT T $2,199.50
504569 KLAERS, ANNE M. $597.29
504570 KORDIAK, JEFFREY $675.07
504571 LANE, LINDA $1,320.59
504572 LEUER, GREGORY J $1,938.38
504573 MCGILL, CHRISTOPHER R. $1,941.55
504574 NELSON, JASON $2,385.25
504575 PETERSON-DUFRESNE, DEBRA A. $1,551.59
504576 PORTINEN, TERI $1,293.27
504577 REINKING, DEREK M $1,626.56
504578 SCHERER, STEVEN T $2,131.46
504579 VIEAU, CECILIA M $1,152.65
504580 VINCK, JOHN J. $1,841.33
504581 ZURBEY, NICHOLAS R $340.34
Total Payroll Direct Deposit $44,343.42
Medina City Council Meeting Minutes 12
November 7, 2012