Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout2022-07-14 packetNotice ive Agenda City of Jefferson Planning and Zmring Commission Thursday, July 14, 2022 _ 5:15 P.M. Council Chambers, John G. Christy Municipal Building, 320 East McCarty Street Enter through Main Lobby All interested par(ies w(ll be given n chnnce to be benrd. TENTATIVE AGENDA 1. Call to Order and Introductions 2. Procedural Matters • Determination of quorum and designation of voting alternates • Call for cases • Receive and review requests for continuance • Receive requests for reordering the agenda • Format of hearing • List of exhibits 3. Adoption of Agenda (as printed or reordered) 4. Approval of the Regular Meeting Minutes of May 12, 2022 5. Communications Received 6. New Business/Public Hearings Case No. P22007 — 203 East Dunklin, Rezoning front C-2 to MU-1. Request filed by Luke and Gretchen Vislay, property owners, for a rezoning of 0.05 acres from C-2 General Commercial to MU-1 Mixed Use. The rezoning request's purpose is for conversion of an existing structure into a 2 writ residence containing I bedroom apartments. The property is located at the northeast comer of the intersection of Madison Street and East Dunklin Street and is described as Part of Inlot No. 823, in the City of Jefferson, Missouri. 7. Other New Business 8. Other Business A. Staff updates mr prior cases B. Election of Officers C. Update on Comprehensive Planning 9. Adjourn Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. Please call (573) 634-6410 with questions regarding agenda items. MINUTES JEFFERSON CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION May 12, 2022 5:15 p.m. COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT ATTE Dale Vaughan, Chair S of 9 Penny Quigg, Vice Chair 9 of 9 Gregory Butler 6 of 9 Emily Fretwell 6 of 9 Spencer Hoogveld, Alternate 4 of 9 Treaka Young, Alternate 2 of 3 Bunnie Trickey Cotten 7 of 9 Dean Dutoi 6 of 9 Shanon Hawk 6 of 9 Blake Markus 3 of 9 COUNCIL LIAISON PRESENT Mike Lester, Council Liaison STAFF PRESENT Sonny Sanders, Director of Planning & Protective Services Dustin Birch, Associate City Counselor Eric Barron, Planning Manager Kortney Bliss, Planner Anne Stratman 1. CaII to Order and Introduction of Members, Ex-officio Members and Staff Chair Dale Vaughan called the meeting to order. Four regular members and two alternates were present. A quorum was present. Designation sit f; g Alternates The Chair announced that all regular members and alternates present are eligible to vote. 2. Procedural Matters and Procedures Explained Ms. Bliss explained the procedures for the meeting. The following documents were entered as exhibits. Ms. Bliss advised that copies of the exhibits are available through the City Clerk or the Department of Planning and Protective Services: The City Code of the City of Jefferson, as amended Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map Copies of applications under consideration A list of property owners to whom notices were sent Affidavit of publication of the public notice in the newspaper Rules of Procedure, Planning & Zoning Commission Ms. Bliss submitted the following items for the record: Staff reports Minutes of proceedings Copies of drawings, plans, and/or renderings under consideration Letters or memoranda from staff Materials submitted by the public or applicants pertaining to the cases under consideration 3. Adoption of Agenda Ms. Quigg moved and Ms. Fretwell seconded to approve the agenda. The motion passed 5-0 with the following votes: Aye: Butler, Fretwell, Hoogveld, Quigg, Young Nay: None 4. Approval of the Regular Meeting Minutes of April 14, 2022. Ms. Fretwell moved and Ms. Quigg seconded to approve the regular meeting minutes of April 14, 2022 as printed. The motion passed 8-0 with the following votes: Aye: Butler, Fretwell, Hoogveld, Quigg, Young Nay: None 6. Communications Received Communications on Case No. P22006 were distributed to Commission Members 6. New Business/Public Hearing Case No. P22006 — 839 Eastland Drive, Final Subdivision Plat and Preliminary PUD Plan. Request filed by ABCO Management. LLC, property owner, on behalf of AutoZone Development. LLC, applicant, for a Final Subdivision Plat consisting of two lots and a Preliminary PUD Plan to construct and operate an auto parts retail sales store on proposed Lot 2. The property is located on the north side of a private commercial drive 500 feet east of the intersection of Eastland Drive and East Elm Street and is described as Part of Lot 56 of Schotthill Woods Subdivision Section 2 in the City of Jefferson, Cole County, Missouri (Spartan Engineering Solutions, LLC, Consultant). Ms. Bliss stated the applicant is requesting a Final Subdivision plat for 2.4 acres. Such plat would create two lots; one would be 1.4 acres and the other 1 acre. Both lots would remain under the existing zoning district, PUD Planned Unit Development. For the proposed 1 acre lot, approval of a Preliminary PUD Plan has been requested. AutoZone requests to build a 7,400 square foot building to house their retail business enterprise. Wesley Berlin, PE, Spartan Engineering Solutions, LLC, 2583 Pine Bluffs Court, Highland, MI, spoke regarding this request. He stated that Spartan Engineering is a civil consultant and also the project representative for AutoZone. We are filling in a vacant portion of the existing development. This is a great site and great location for AutoZone. AutoZone is strictly a retail sales business, there are no additional services such as oil changes. It is strictly indoor sales, there is no outdoor storage. AutoZone is a low intensity use and is not a huge traffic generator. No one spoke in opposition to this request. Ms. Bliss stated that staff recommends approval of both the Final Subdivision Plat and the Preliminary PUD Plan. The proposal appears to meet all applicable requirements of the Zoning Code and the Subdivision Code for the City of Jefferson. With respect to the City Code, this request is subject to staff comments, including but not limited to those of the Public Works Department, Fire Department, and Building Division, Ms. Quigg moved and Mr. Butler seconded to recommend to the City Council approval of the AZ Jefferson City Subdivision Final Subdivision Plat. The motion passed 5-0 with the following votes: Aye: Butler, Fretwell, Hoogveld, Quigg, Young Nay: None Ms. Fretwell moved and Mr. Butler seconded to recommend to the City Council approval of the Preliminary PUD Plan for property addressed as 839 Eastland Drive. a. Establishment of an underlying zoning district of C-2 General Commercial for the purpose of determining permitted uses, signage, and lighting. The motion passed 5-0 with the following votes: Aye: Butler, Fretwell, Hoogveld, Quigg, Young Nay: None 7, Other New Business None, 8. Other Business A. Mr. Barron gave an update on the Rezoning and Preliminary PUD Plan for 101 Jackson Street. B. Mr. Barron stated that P&Z Member Candace Moore has submitted a resignation letter effective immediately. Adjourn. There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 5:47 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Eric Barron, Secretary Jefferson City Planning & Zoning Commission July 14, 2022 Case No. P22007 203 East Dunklin Street Rezoning from C-2 General Commercial to MU-1 Mixed Use PLANNING STAFF REPORT CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION July 14, 2022 Case No. P22007 - 203 East Dnnhhll, Rezoning from C-2 to MU-1. Request filed by Luke and Gretchen Vislay, property owners, for a rezoning of 0.05 acres from C-2 General Commercial to MU-1 Mixed Use. The rezoning request's purpose is for conversion of an existing structure into a 2 unit residence containing 1 bedroom apartments. The property is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Madison Street and East Dunklin Street and is described as Part of Inlet No. 823, in the City of Jefferson, Missouri. Nature of Request: The building on the property consist of an approximately 850 sf, 2 story structure (�1700 sf total). The most recent use of the building was as a Buddhist Church. The property owner desires to convert the building to a two - unit residential use, with one unit on the first floor and one on the second. The C-2 zoning of the property does not permit 2-unit residential uses, and would only support an ancillary residential use of the upper floor (loft apartment). In order to accommodate the desired use of the property, and considering the prevalence of nearby residential uses mixed with commercial uses, the property owner is requesting a rezoning of the property to a MU-1 Mixed Use designation. Zonine and Surroundine Land Use: Current Zoning: C-2 Current Use: Vacant, previously a church with upstairs living area. Requested Zoning: MU-1 Intended Use: 2-unit residential Surroundiu Zonin Surroundin Uses North C-2 Multi -family residential South C-2 Restaurant, offices East C-2 Commercial with loft apartments, 2-unit residential West C-2 Commercial billboard lot, retail/restaurant Allowed Uses: Permitted uses Within the MU -I district include a mix of residential uses (single family up to 4-unit buildings) and low intensity commercial uses, including offices, personal service uses (up to 2,500 sf in area), and retail uses (up to 2,500 sf in area). Review Criteria for Rezoning: The applicant has provided written responses to the review criteria for a rezoning. See attached application materials. Staff Analysis of RezoninE Proposal: Standard checklist for rezoning: Yes No Notes: Complies with Comprehensive Plan X The Comprehensive Plan/Future Land Use map identifies the property and surrounding area as intended for Mixed Use. The Southside/Old Munichburg Neighborhood Plan further calls out the need to support the mixed use of the area. Has access to necessary utilities X The property has access to necessary utilities. Located outside flood zone X The property is not located within a flood zone. Meets district size requirement X The MU4 district does not have a minimum or maximum size regulation, but does have a requirement that the district must be supported by an adopted neighborhood Plan. The Southside/Old Munichburg Neighborhood Plan supports the requested mixed use designation. Planning and Zoning Commission Case No. P22007 July 14, 2022 Page 2 Benefit to City is substantial when compared to X The City would benefit from a continuation of - adverse effects on adjacent property and increase in - residential uses in the area. After rezoning, the allowed uses would be X While the MU-1 zoning would permit fidl compatible with uses allowed in adjacent districts residential use of the building and restrict the more intense commercial uses (while the surrounding property remained zoned C-2), the size of the building already prevents any intense commercial use and the adjacent properties have a mix of loft apartment and existing residential use. After rezoning, the allowed uses would be X The MU-1 zoning district would be more compatible with adjacent existing land uses compatible with the existing uses in the surrounding area than the current C-2 designation. If not rezoned, the owner would be deprived of use X The prevailing use in the area is a mix of advantages enjoyed by surrounding owners (reverse residential and commercial uses. spot zoning) The requested rezoning would be an expansion of an X This would be the only instance of MU -I existing district zoning in the area, however, the zoning is supported by adopted plans and the surrounding area may be suitable for further Mixed Use zoning designation, Staff Recommendations: Rezoning Request: Staff recommends approval of the request to rezone the property from C-2 to MU-1. The proposed rezoning to Mixed Use is supported by the Future Land Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan and supported by the adopted Southside/Old Munichburg Neighborhood Plan. The existing mix of residential and low intensity commercial uses in the area supports a mixed use designation for the area. A rove Den Neutral Staff Recommendation X Form of Motion: Motion to recommend approval to the City Council ofthe request to rezone the property, consisting of 0.05 acres, from C-2 to MU-1. City of Jefferson Planning and Toning Commission LOCATION IVIA 1 cap Case No. P22007 203 East Dunklin Street Rezoning from C-2 to MU-1 0 25 50 100 Feel N N r E S `Ky of ,Doffers®n Planning sand Zonin I ��®vannissi®n VICINITY 0 70 140 280 Feel �, Case No. P22007 l 203 East Dunklin Street WV \ E Rezoning from C-2 to MU -'I S City of Jefferson Department of Planning 6: Protective Services 320 E. McCarty Street Jefferson City, MO 66101 Phone: 573.634.6410 ICnlannhl itleficflVmo,orn www.Jeffersonchymo.gov APPLICATION FOR ZONING 1. The undersigned hereby petitions the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council of the Cily of Jefferson, Missouri, for the following amendment to the Zoning Code: � Map Amendment � Text Amendment (Include description of proposed text amendment) Property Address: 0.0, GIrS T OQM VK U N 2. Applications for Map amendments shall include a location map and legal description. 3. This petition requests to rezone the above described real estate from its present classification of C._Z d/i�strict toi �.i — �district. The purpose of this rezoning request is lo: l /IhI/1? ,P,VId1VI e 010117AIH. IM+n v211n1�N�Cl/��n" 4. Filing fee: Map Amendment = $650. Text Amendment = $450. 5. Required Findings: Applicant responses to the required findings shall be noted in Addendum A and vary based on type of request. 6. The undersigned certify to be all of the owners) of the above described property and tha4 the submitted information (including all attachments to this application) is true and correct. (All owners of this property must sign and the signatures must be notarized). Properly Oym r Signa re Printed Name/Titlef ( pe or print) l/ Cr�n USIA y , &ti me, Prop5KOwfier Signatu a L- Printed Name/Title (type r print) ��^^ :Om AM is Y�efgre me is L day of Mtate of Missourit� /tCole County,{/o/f''mission # 21766109yission Expires 03-08-2025 Notary Public For City Use Only: (Revised July 1, 2018) Application Filing FeA:-MapAmendment = $850 ($450 + $200 Advertising Fee)_ _ - L(�CnX I (r ��r��� j — Text Amendment = $450 ($250 + $200 Advertising Fee) ti rid (WL Application Filing Fee Received: Gash (recelpt # ) Check (copy: check # ) Attachments: Addendum A X Map Applicant/Project Information Sheet Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. Page 1 of 6 Jefferson City Zoning Amendment Application Addendum A — Review Criteria To be used to support zoning amendment requests. (Section 35-74.B.4) Properly Address Applicant Name /FLU 7 Provide responses to the following required findings by selecting all criteria that apply to your request. State all reasons for your answer and use additional pages to complete your answer if necessary. A. The existing zoning was in error ai the time of adoption. Explain. Pines � ayoulm -irn elb uNct Cfc rC B. There has been a change in character in the area due to installation of public facilities, other zone changes, new growth trends, neighborhood deterioration, or development transitions. Explain the change and be specific on which public facilities, other zone changes, new growth trends, neighborhood deterioration, or development transitions that effected the change. C. There is a community need for the proposed rezoning. (i.) What will the proposed zoning be? (ii.) Why does the community need this zoning? D. The proposed change is consistent with, and in furtherance of, the implementation of the goats and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, other adopted plans, and the policies, intents and requirements of this Ordinance and other City regulations and guidelines. Page 2 of 6 E. The proposed zoning is compatible with the zoning and uses of property nearby. Property North — Properly East — Property South — Property Was, Public and community facilities, which may include, but are not limited to, sanitary and storm sewers, water, electrical service, police and fire protection, schools, parks and recreation facilities, roads, libraries, and solid waste collection and disposal, are available and adequate to serve uses authorized under the proposed zoning. List public and community facilities available on the site. G. A traffic impact analysis has been provided to indicate the potential number of new trips generated and provisions are provided to mitigate impacts of high traffic -generating projects. (See Section 35-60.Traffic Impact Analysis regarding vehicle trip thresholds and traffic impact analysis requirements) H. Authorized uses shall not adversely affect the capacity or safely of the street network in the vicinity of the property. (i.) Describe the proposed use. (ii.) Will the proposed use adversely affect the capacity or safety of the street network in the vicinity of the property? Whyywhy not? I. Potential environmental impacts (e.g., excessive storm water runoff, water pollution, air pollution, noise pollution, excessive lighting, or other environmental harms) of authorized uses shall be mitigated. List any potential environmental impacts and how they will be mitigated. J. There is an adequate supply of land available in the subject area and the surrounding community to accommodate the zoning and community needs. K. Benefits shall be derived by the wmmunity or area proposed to be rezoned. List the benefits of the proposed rezoning. Page 3 of 6 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION PART OF INLOT NO. 823, IN THE CITY OF JEFFERSONI MISSOURII MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID INLOT, WHICH POINT IS 4 FEET 6 INCHES WESTERLY FROM THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER THEREOF; THENCE NORTHERLY PARALLEL WITH THE EASTERLY LINE THEREOF, 54 FEET 9 INCHES; THENCE WESTERLY PARALLEL WITH DUNKLIN STREET, 41 FEET 6 INCHES; THENCE SOUTHERLY PARALLEL WITH MADISON STREET, 54 FEET 9 INCHES, TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID INLOT; THENCE EASTERLY PARALLEL WITH DUNKLIN STREET, AND ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID INLOT, 41 FEET 6 INCHES, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. CRITERIA RESPONSES A. THE EXISTING ZONING WAS IN ERROR AT THE TIME OF ADOPTION. EXPLAIN. As stated in the Activate Jefferson City 2040 Comprehensive Plan, 'Social, economic, and environmental conditions are constantly evolvingl' So it would only be reasonable to expect that the existing zoning determined so many years ago may not be fitting for the year 2022. What we understand is that the existing zoning for the building at 203 East Dunklin would have been determined in the 1960's - maybe even earlier than thatl However, we can only speak from our experience regarding why the zoning for 203 East Dunklin should be updated MU-1. First, our experience and knowledge about this area is that it has a much more basic need for single -dwelling residential units than commercial store frontage. Since 2001, we have been property owners of a building at 205 East Dunklin which contains 2 small office spaces in front and 4 one bedroom apartments in back. Over the years we have been disappointed to learn how difficult it is for our agent to find suitable businesses that are able to occupy small commercial spaces. Several times, it has taken years to find a single tenant that is suitable for our small commercial unit. We are concerned that 203 East Dunklin -if it remains as being zoned as C-2 -will suffer the same fate. Vacant commercial frontage gives an impression that the area or unit is undesirable. Neither is the case, but that can be the perception. Furthermore, the COVID pandemic has dramatically changed the landscape for rental of small commercial space. Many small business owners now realize that they can operate their businesses from home easily and have no need for off -site, brick and mortar business locations. This makes it even more difficult to find an appropriate business for a small commercial space. Conversely, we have had hundreds of people interested in and apply for the existing residential apartments that we own which is why we believe MU-1 zoning is appropriate for 203 East Dunklin at which our intention is to create 2 one bedroom apartments. The property at 203 East Dunklin, which we are asking to be rezoned to MU4, is similar to our property at 205 East Dunklin in that both buildings have similar parking situations which provide only two parking spaces per business owner in front of the commercial space. We have found that this is a dilemma that potential business owners who consider tenancy at the location seem to be unable - or unwilling- to try to overcome. Two parking spaces in which to conduct business is not sufficient. With the existing property boundaries, it is not possible to expand the parking area for either building. In the past, we have tried to remedy the parking problem by offering and securing additional off -site parking, however, tenants are not willing to use the off -site spaces. On -street parking spaces are coveted and protected by those people whose businesses are adjacent to those on -street spaces and as surprising as It may seem, others that utilize those spaces will be told they can't park there) This parking quandary has not been created by us or any of the previous owners. It exists because of how the properties were situated when they were built back in the 70's. Over 50 years the area has grown, times have changed, and so this problem has just manifested itself into what it is today. B. THERE HAS BEEN A CHANGE IN CHARACTER IN THE AREA DUE TO INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC FACILITIES, OTHER ZONE CHANGES, NEW GROWTH TRENDS, NEIGHBORHOOD DETERIORATION, OR DEVELOPMENT TRANSITIONS. EXPLAIN THE CHANGE AND BE SPECIFIC ON WHICH PUBLIC FACILITIES, OTHER ZONE CHANGES, NEW GROWTH TRENDS, NEIGHBORHOOD DETERIORATION, OR DEVELOPMENT TRANSITIONS THAT EFFECTED THE CHANGE. There have been numerous changes in the area since we first Invested 20 years ago. The character of the area has been transforming and has improved greatly over the years, into a mixture of new and Interesting businesses along with the longstanding businesses. The positive transformations that have been made on Dunklin Street have been the very lovely tennis court upgrade at Lincoln University and a nice, new water park for children across the street. Busch's has refurbished their greenhouse. Capital Region has done some updating. We were disappointed to see the Dollar Store close. There Is a real need for a retail store like that in the area. The block west on Dunklin has been refurbished and businesses have made a go of it. Some have failed and moved on. Some are doing well. Some of the historically significant places to frequent such as the Ecco Lounge, Busch's florist and Central Dairy thrive in the area. These businesses are within walking distance in the Old Munichberg district which enables people without any means of transportation to have enjoyment of living. We, ourselves, have tenants that frequently support local businesses. Many utilize the bus service that is across the street to assist them in shopping throughout the city. These changes have resulted in the creation of an area in which people want to live. Over the years, our property at 205 East Dunklin has housed numerous Lincoln University students as well as area legislators and their aides. Currently, one of our apartment tenants lost her apartment when the tornado hit. Another tenant, an adult, senior woman, Is working toward getting her GED and is able to do that because right across the street is the Adult Learning Center that she walks to daily for classes. Both women enjoy living in the Old Munichberg district and the apartments we provide. But despite all of these changes and efforts, there is still a lot of neighborhood blight that exists. Some owners lack pride in their property and provide substandard living spaces that lack upkeep on the interior and the exterior of their buildings which creates unattractive landscapes. There is a solid need for finer, appropriately -priced apartments for business professionals, students, legislators, and young people, which is what we intend to provide at 203 East Dunklin. C. THERE IS A COMMUNITY NEED FOR THE PROPOSED REZONING. WHAT WILL THE PROPOSED ZONING BE? i. The proposed zoning will be MU-1 WHY DOES THE COMMUNITY NEED THIS ZONING? li. There is a genuine need for apartments in the Old Munichberg area as explained above. Our experience as current owners of a building containing 4 one bedroom apartments at 205 East Dunklin in the Old Munichberg district (over the past 20+years), is that when an apartment vacancy occurs at 205 East Dunklin, we have many interested applicants. They articulate that the units are clean, attractive and affordable. In fact, people who are in need of an apartment routinely call in anticipation of any pending apartment vacancy. There is never a lack of interest in an apartment and many of our tenants stay for years and support the area. We know we can offer an excellent quality apartment available to the community at 203 East Dunklin, D. THE PROPOSED CHANGE IS CONSISTENT WITH. AND IN FURTHERANCE OF. THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GOALS AND POLICIES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, OTHER ADOPTED PLANS, AND THE POLICIES, INTENTS AND REQUIREMENTS O F THIS ORDINANCE AND OTHER CITY REGULATION AND GUIDELINES. The rezoning of the property will provide for more housing in the Old Munichberg area which is consistent with and in furtherance of the Comprehensive Plan. 5o very many of the 'Goals and Objectives' that were stated in the Plan involved are: • Stabilizing existing neighborhoods; • Preventing deterioration of neighborhoods; • Promoting residential units in commercial structures and promoting neighborhood stabilization through the rehabilitation and maintenance of residential properties; • Promoting the development and maintenance of affordable housing, rental and ownership options, through the City; and • Enhancing the housing environment by catering to the diverse needs of its residents. By creating livable spaces that are cared for and protected, residents have a sense of place and become people who are invested in the neighborhood in which they live. It gives residents a sense of identity which also helps to promote safety and beautification. Providing good -quality housing aids in the overall vitality of the area. When people live in a space that they are proud of, that feeling also extends into the entire neighborhood and helps them grow a connection to a neighborhood and city that they care about and one they want to live in for a long time. Also, as described in the Comprehensive Plan adopted by the city, under Housing and Neighborhood in Chapter 3, one of the 'Notable Goals' specifically mentioned for the southside area is to 'Incrementally grow a diverse, multi -generational, mixed -use complete neighborhood which retains its historic character and unique sense of place.' The zoning change for 203 East Dunklin would help to accomplish the Comprehensive Plan goals. Another of the objectives listed under the Housing and Neighborhood Goals is to 'Create tools to increase quality housing stock in Jefferson City.' Multi -Use 1(MU-1) zoning helps to accomplish that objective and is the closest category that applies. E. THE PROPOSED ZONING IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE ZONING AND USES OF PROPERTY NEARBY. The proposed rezoning of 203 East Dunklin to MU-1 would be very compatible with the existing nearby properties. In fact, many of the surrounding properties, despite being zoned C-2, are used exclusively as residential units. The entire area already reflects 'multiple uses' being utilized. Property North —Three separate buildings exist. The first is a segmented house used as 2 apartments; the second is a segmented house used as 3 apartments; and CoMo Premium Exteriors is around the corner. Property South — Ice Cream Factory, AEL and ABLE Learning Center are across the street Property East — One segmented house used as 2 apartments, Barnes & Associates, and Capitol Chiropractic Care Property West —Central Bank Billboard and Busch's Florist F. PUBLIC AND COMMUNITY FACILITES. WHICH MAY INCLUDE. BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS. WATER, ELECTRICAL SERVICE, POLICE AND FIRE PROTECTION, SCHOOLS, PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES, ROADS LIBRARIES AND SOLID WASTE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL, ARE AVAILABLE AND ADEQUATE TO SERVE USES AUTHORIZED UNDER THE PROPOSED ZONING. LIST PUBLIC AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES AVAILABLE ON THE SITE. The public and community facilities in the area are adequate and rezoning to MU-1 will not result in an increase in public expenditures. G. A TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO INDICATE THE POTENTIAL NUMBER OF NEW TRIPS GENERATED AND PROVISION S ARE PROVIDED TO MITIGATE IMPACTS OF HIGH TRAFFIC-GENERRATING PROJECTS. This criteria does not apply to our request. H. AUHOIZED USES SHALL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE CAPACITY OR SAFETY OF THE STREET NETWORK IN THE VICINITY OF THE PROPERTY. i. DESCRIBE THE PROPOSED USE. i. One parking space per unit for a total of 2 vehicles potentially. MU-1 rezoning will not unduly increase traffic on the street. ii. WILL THE PROPOSED USE ADVERSELY AFFECT THE CAPACITY OR SAFETY OF THE STREET NETWORK IN THE VICINITY OF THE PROPERTY? WHY/WHY NOT? ii. The proposed use will not adversely affect the capacity or safety of the street network in the vicinity of the property. Parking of one car per unit is all that is needed and space for same is already provided on the property itself, and not on the street. I. POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (E.G. EXCESSIVE STORM WATER RUNOFF WATER POLLUTION, AIR POLLUTION, NOISE POLLUTION, EXCESSIVE LIGHTING OR OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL HARMS) OF AUTHORIZED USES SHALL BE MITIGATED, LIST ANY POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND HOW THEY WILL BE MITIGATED. This criteria does not apply to our request. We are not aware of any potential environmental impacts that might be caused by the zoning change. No changes we have planned for the building will have any potential impact. J. THERE IS AN ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF LAND AVAILABLE IN THE SUBJECT AREA AND THE SURROUNDING COMMUNITY TO ACCOMMODATE THE ZONING AND COMMUNITY NEEDS. This criteria does not apply to our request. There is adequate land available on the property to accommodate the MU-1 zoning needs. No need for any additional land to accommodate the zoning change. K. BENEFITS SHALL BE DERIVED BY THE COMMUNITY OR AREA PROPOSED TO BE REZONED. LIST THE BENEFITS OF THE PROPOSED REZONING. The benefits to be derived from the proposed rezoning would initially manifest itself in the refurbishing of a property that has been lacking an attractive aesthetic quality for many years. Renovation of the exterior and interior will help to improve neighboring property values and neighborhood aesthetics. The community will also benefit because grounded, lasting, consistent residents add economic vibrancy and stability to the area by frequenting the local stores, businesses and restaurants in Old Munichberg and Jefferson City. Rezoning of 203 East Dunklin to MU-1 is appropriate for the property and an appropriate solution for the parking issues for the current commercial tenants trying to do business at 205 East Dunklin and other businesses on East Dunklin. By rezoning and converting the 203 East Dunklin building to 2 residential one bedroom apartments, in which residents will only be permitted to park one vehicle per unit, the commercial businesses at 205 East Dunklin and their customers will be able to utilize and share the unused spaces during business hours at 203 East Dunklin when the residents are at work. This provides some 'overflow parking spaces' for the commercial tenants and their customers during business hours and also prevents on -street parking from being absorbed by customers doing business at 205 East Dunklin. As long time property owners in the Old Munlchberg area and residents of Jefferson City, we are invested in the area and have an Interest in not only protecting our own Investments, but seeing the city grow, the neighborhood improve and become a vital part of the city's Plan for the area. We are excited to be part of the revitalization of the city and are willing to continue to invest our time, effort and finances in the community by utilizing a property that has been underutilized for quite some time. Preventing deterioration of the buildings in the area, such as we are doing, benefits not only the city, but the residents. It enriches the city center environment and strengthens the quality of life for residents. Our request for rezoning 203 East Dunklin from C-Z to MU-1 is a reasonable one that makes the best possible use of an existing structure. Rezoning to MU-1 will not be detrimental to public welfare, injurious to the other property owners In the area or negatively affect any of the improvements In the neighborhood which have already been made and therefore, we ask for your approval of our request. Thank you foryour service on the Planning &Zoning Committee and City Council and the time you've devoted to hearing and considering our Application for Zoning Amendment. Cify of Jefferson Department of Planning 6 Protective Services 320 E. McCarty St. Jefferson City, MO 65101 June 30, 2022 Dear Property Owner: Carrie Tergin, Mayor Sonny Sanders, AICP, Director Phone., 573-634-6410 Fax; 573-634.6457 This letter is to notify you that the Jefferson City Planning and Zoning Commission will meet at 5:15 p.m. on Thursday, July 14, 2022, to consider the following matters (see map on back): Case No. P22007 — 203 East Dunklin, Rezoning from C-2 to MU-1. Request filed by Luke and Gretchen Vislay, property owners, for a rezoning of 0.05 acres from C-2 General Commercial to MU-1 Mixed Use. The rezoning request's purpose is for conversion of an existing structure into a 2 unit residence containing 1 bedroom apartments. The property is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Madison Street and East Dunklin Street and is described as Part of Inlot No. 823, in the City of Jefferson, Missouri. As a nearby landowner and/or neighbor, you are being provided notice of this hearing. Unfortunately, we are unable to record comments received by telephone, however, written comments may be directed to the Planning and Zoning Commission in one of the following ways: e-mail: JCPlanning@jeffersoncitymo.gov fax: Dept. of Planning and Protective Services ! Planning Division 573-634-6457 mail: Dept. of Planning and Protective Services ! Planning Division John G. Christy Municipal Building, 320 E. McCarty Street Jefferson City, MO 65101 Written comments received on or before 100 the day of the meeting will be made a part of the official record and copied and distributed to Commission members at the meeting. Those unable to provide written comments in advance are invited to deliver their comments to the Commission Chairman only at the meeting. Correspondence received after 1:00 p.m, will be included in the official record, but there is no guarantee that copies will be made for distribution to all Commission members. For your information, this case is tentatively scheduled for a public hearing in front of the City Council on August 15, 2022. The City Council meets at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the John G. Christy Municipal Building, 320 East McCarty Street. Information regarding this case may be viewed on the Planning and Zoning Commission webpage at: hriD//www ieffersoncitvmo gov/aovernmenUplanninglplanning and zoning commission phD If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact 573.634.6573. BestReg Kortney Bliss Planner 1 Individuals should mntaM the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required render the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. Please call (573) 634-6410 with questions regarding agenda items. Jefferson City Planning and Zoning Commission Property Owner List Case P22007 203 East Dunklin Street THOMAS, DARRYLJ & STEPHANIE M 225 E DUNKLIN ST DRUBECK INC JEFFERSON CITY MO, 65101 2632 TWIN HILLS RD 225 E DUNKLIN ST MO 65101 JEFFERSON CITY MO, 65109 5-6-7-8 DANCENTER MO SMITH, THOMAS W JR & CATHERINE I 320 MONROE ST ST CHARLES MO, 63301 209 E CEDAR WAY MO 65101 LAMB, ZACHARY&ROBYN 5580 S VAN GORDON WAY LITTLETON CO, 80127-4584 211 E CEDAR WAY MO 65101 ARETE 220 L L C 220 E DUNKLIN ST JEFFERSON CITY MO, 65101 220 E DUNKLIN ST MO 65101 MCGENNIS GROUP L L C 12110 CO RD 4049 HOLTS SUMMIT MO, 65043 615 MADISON ST MO 65101 GASH LEASING L L C PO BOX 203 HIGGINSVILLE MO, 64037 E DUNKLIN ST MO 65101 DALLMEYER, STEPHAN DTRUSTEE PO BOX 96 JEFFERSON CITY MO, 65102 130 E DUNKLIN ST MO 65101 EDWARDS, WILLIAM B & MARIDEE 1750TANNER BRIDGE RD 1EFFERSON CITY MO, 65101 203 E DUNKLIN ST MO 65101 ABADIS PROPERTY L L C 5601 E DEER PARK RD COLUMBIA MO, 65201 200 E CEDAR WAY JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 7/14/2022 STONEBRIDGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT L L C 210 E DUNKLIN ST ttA4 JEFFERSON CITY MO, 65101 210 E DUNKLIN ST MO 65101 MISSOURI JAYCEE FOUNDATION INC 222 E DUNKLIN ST JEFFERSON CITY MO, 65101 222 E DUNKLIN ST MO 65101 VISCO ENTERPRISES L L C PO BOX 104182 JEFFERSON CITY MO, 65110-4182 205 E DUNKLIN ST MO 65101 SPIREALTYLLC 302 S MAPLE ST ELDON MO, 65026 701 MADISON ST MO 65101 CENTRAL DAIRY CO 610 MADISON ST JEFFERSON CITY MO, 65101 616 MADISON ST MO 65101 CENTRAL DAIRY CO 610 MADISON ST JEFFERSON CITY MO, 65101 605 MADISON ST MO 65101 SLAUGHTERHOUSE ENTERPRISES L L C 1114 VINEYARD SQ JEFFERSON CITY MO, 65101 217 E CEDAR WAY MO 65101 MCGENNIS, ANGIE L PO BOX 106026 JEFFERSON CITY MO, 65110 Jefferson City Planning and Zoning Commission Property Owner List Case P22007 203 East Dunklin Street 7/14/2022 617 MADISON ST MO 65101 SMITH, THOMAS W JR 320 MONROE ST ST CHARLES MO, 63301 210 E CEDAR WAY MO 65101 COSIMO PROPERTIES L L C 920 NOB HILL JEFFERSON CITY MO, 65109 704 MADISON ST MO 65101 BARNES, RANDALL O 219 E DUNKLIN STSTE A JEFFERSON CITY MO. 65101 219 E DUNKLIN ST MO 65101 CHAPEL HOUSE L L C 701 PRIMROSE CT JEFFERSON CITY MO, 65109 211 E DUNKLIN ST MO 65101 MILLER, TODD LAW OFFICES OF L L C 1305 SOUTHWEST BLVD STE A JEFFERSON CITY MO, 65109 208 E CEDAR WAY MO 65101 CENTERPOINTE PEOPERTIES L L C 143 SANDRA LN NORTH ANDOVER MA, 1845 620 MADISON ST MO 65101 FREEMAN PROPERTIES J C M O L L C 1324 ROSEVIEW DR JEFFERSON CITY MO, 65101 128 E DUNKLIN ST MO 65101 A G PROPERTY RENTAL L L C 3226 S TEN MILE DR JEFFERSON CITY MO, 65109 206 E DUNKLIN STJEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 Case P22007 203 East Dunklin Street Rezoning from C-2 to MU-1 185 ft. Notification Buffer 0 37.5 75 150 225 300 Feet