HomeMy Public PortalAbout2022-07-14 packetAmended Notice of Meeting & Tentative Agenda
City of J effe rson Public Works & Planning Committe e
Thursday, July 14, 2022
7:30a.m.
John G. Christy Municipal Building, 320 East McCarty Street
Council Chambers Room (Upper Level)
~ Note: VIRTUAL and IN-PERSON MEETING
To join virtually:
https://jefferson city.webex.c om/jefferson city/j.php?MTID=me4b1f744ee040921353b0c2a43729806
To join virtually call-in available at 1-404-397-1516
Meeting number (access code): 2488 395 0346
Meeting password : 1234
T E NTATIVE AGENDA
1. Introductions
2. Approval of the June 9, 2022 Committee meeting minutes
3. New Business
1) High St reet Viaduct (Dav id Ban ge )
2) Street Division Trucks and Frame Damage (Britt Smith)
3) Atchison Court Vacation Update (David Bange)
4) Parking Report and Pay by App (Britt Smith)
5) City/County Economic Development Project Algoa Multimodal Facility (Luke
Ho ltschneider/Matt Morasch)
6) Program for Upgrading Private Stormwater Systems (Don Fontana/David Bange)
7) Transit Studies Review (Mark Mehmert)
8) Additional Funds for Overlay and Micro Surfacing $250K (Britt Smith)
9) Capital Area Active Transportation Plan (Katrina Williams)
10) CDBG-DR Proposal Resolution (Rachel Senzee)
11) CDBG 2022 Annual Action Plan Resolution (Rachel Senzee)
12) Historic Legacy Dis trict Ordinance (Rachel Senzee)
13) Yard Waste Drop Off and Composting Contract (Sonny Sanders)
4. Citizen opportunity to address Council/Staff on Stormwater and Other Public Works Issues
5. Reports: Neighborhood Service Grant Updates (Rachel Senzee)
6. Adjourn
NOTES
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634 -6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under
the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request.
Please call (573) 634-641 0 with questions regarding agenda items .
MINUTES
JEFFERSON CITY
PUBLIC WORKS AND PLANNING COMMITTEE
John G . Christy Municipal Building , 320 East McCarty Street
Council Chambers and Virtual
Committee Members Present:
Ron Fitzwater
David Kemna
Mike Lester
Mark Schreiber
Scott Spencer
Staff Present:
Matt Morasch, Director of Public Works
David Bange, City Engineer
Don Fontana, Stormwater Engineer
Jon Fitch, Civil Engineer II
Mark Mehmert, Transit Division Director
Eric Barron , Planning/MPO Manage r
Rachel Senzee , Neighborhood Servi
Katrina Williams , Planner
Karli Reinkemeye r , Neighborhood Servi
Matt Kreyling , Building
Jessica Rackers , IT
Dustin Birch , Associ
Todd Spalding , Di
Matt Schofield , Fi
Steve Crowell , City
Angie Has inist
June 9 , 2022
Attendance
3 of 3
3 of 3
3 of 3
3 of 3
3 of 3
meeting to order at 7 :30 a .m . A quorum was present at this
TT"'',"'"'''"' the meeting: Mayor Carrie Tergin ; Matt Brenneke , 1605
· and Anna Watson with News Tribune .
made at this time .
nee was done prior to agenda items .
Chairman Fi t zwater requested Item 3.3. be moved to the front of the agenda .
2) Approval of th e May 12 , 2022 Committee meeting minute s
Councilman Lester moved and Councilman Kemna seconded to approve the May
12, 2022 minutes , with the correction of the second by Schrieber and the votes as
follows:
Minutes/Jefferson City Public Works and Plann ing Committee
June 9, 2022
Aye: Fitzwater, Schrieber, Spencer
Nay: Kemna, Lester
on Item 9, motion as amended approved.
3) New Business
2
~ 3. Updates to Chapter 32-230 Litter (David Helmick)
Mr. Helmick explained the various amendments to the code which included
changing the abatement action for when hazardous condition to a 24-hour time
limit and removing the "who has the authority to issue tickets"
There was discussion among Committee me
difference in the time limit for litter and nuisances. N
staff regarding the
iven 1 0 days due to
State Statute.
Councilman Spencer moved and C
code changes to the City Council with reco
Mr. Morasch explained the
Councilman Jack Deeken. He sta
temporarily suspending fares to the
route fares only for a m of up
six months, the FT A
be conducted.
suspension as requested by
to decide to recommend
s a suspension of fixed
pension lasts longer than
a fare equity analysis must
members, staff and those present
ore ridership, the need for businesses
the Handiwheels fares as they are
and Councilman Kemna seconded to send a
recommendation to approve suspending the fixed
otion carried.
Applications (David Bange)
Mr. Bange e pained the list of projects that were eligible for the Transportation
Alternative Program (TAP). He stated TAP grants fund projects that provide alternative
modes of transportation including pedestrian, bicycle , and other non-motorized uses .
The application deadline in July 151h .
The~e was discussion among Committee members and staff regarding the
various projects , if Parks was willing to match funds, and which projects where likely to
be approved.
Min utes/Jeffe rso n Cit y Publi c Works and Planni ng Committee
Jun e 9, 2022
-
3
Councilman Kemna moved and Councilman Schrieber seconded to approve the
Wears Creek Greenway, Highway 54 Bypass and the Greenway Crosswalk
Improvements, at Southwest and at Lafayette , motion carried.
4. Commu nity Development Block Grant -Disa ste r Re cov e ry
(Rachel Senzee)
Ms. Senzee explained the City is required to formally submit a proposal for
anticipated use of the funds . Staff is requesting the Committee rove the resolution to
go forward t o the City Council.
There was discussion among Committee memb
housing programs that assist recovery efforts from
providing $7,059,300 to the City .
Councilman Lester moved and
resolution to t he City Council with recom
Mr. Morasch gave an introdu
to build a dormitory but never did. This
There was discussi
condition of the street,
easement.
regarding affordable
nado and the grant
the
xplained Lincoln University was
y to the University .
regarding the issue, the
the City , and keeping a utility
Mr. incoln University and report back to the
Committee .
placed on the July agenda for follow up .
uncilman Ron Fitzwater)
an update. Mr. Morasch explained the field work has
II be back in July with a draft report which will be presented to
There n among Committee members and staff regarding the parking
mobile app. Chai r stated he would like for the Committee to keep updated with
the Capitol Avenue ga ge, the MSP prison site , and parking fares .
7 . Bird S c ooter's (Councilman Ron Fitzwater)
Chairman Fitzwater explained he has had complaints on the scooters stacking up at the
Courthouse . Mr. Birch explained there are restrictions on where the scooters can be , which
does not include residential areas .
8. Prio rity Projects for ARPA Funding (Councilm a n Ron Fitzwate r)
Minutes/Jefferson City Public Works and Planning Committee
June 9, 2022
Chairman Fitzwater gave a general update and various ideas for the funds .
There was discussion among Committee members and staff regarding the needs of
Public Works equipment , the Central Maintenance study, street/utility components of
annexations, overlay, and prison projects.
4) Citizen opportunity to address Council/Staff on Stormwater and Other Public
Works Issues
• 1605 Marion Drive Stormwater Issue-Matt Brenneke
4
Mr. Brenneke explained the storm drain issues which
easement for the drain so it is the property owner resp
address his situation as well as other properties. H
has explained there is no
requested the Council to
ould be a budget for
emergency situations.
•
•
5)
Ms . Senzee gave
opportunities for u
update the public
respective constitue
6)
this
regarding
Department of Public Works Memorandum
32 0 E. McCarty Street ·Jefferson City, Missouri 65101 • P 573 -634-641 0 • F 573-634-6562 • www.ieffcitymo.org
Date: July 12, 2022
To: Public Work and Planning Committee
From: Britt E. Smith, P.E.
Subject: Cracked Frame on Tandem Dump Truck 209
Staff would like to make the committee award of an issue found on one of our tandem
axel dump truck. Although this issue does not result in an immediate problem, we
estimate that the truck may only be serviceable for another year.
Truck 209 is a 2006 model tandem axel dump truck with almost 6,000 hours. It is used
year-round as a snow plow and to support our repair and maintenance crews . We
estimate truck of this type to have 15 years of usual life .
During a recent inspection of the truck, some cracks and distresses were noted with the
frame . As noted on the attached picture one crack is opened up . This particular crack
we believe to be repairable but we are seeing sign of distress in areas further forward
which we believe will eventually cause issues we usability of the truck.
The frame in this area is a double "C" channel and corrosion is noted between the two
channels. The corrosion is pushing up on the top of the outer channel. This upward
movement is causing stress in the area where bolts go thru both channels.
Although difficult to predict, we believe we can get another year life out of the truck but
we will need to do regular inspections of the area. Due to supply change issues, if we
were to order a truck now it may take as much as a year or more to get a replacement.
cc: Matt Morasch, P.E.
Attachment
Repairable Crack
Hairline Distress which we will
monitor. If/when it increases in
size we expect issues with
serviceability of the truck.
Memorandum
320 East McCarty Street • Jefferson City, Missouri 65101 • P: 573 .634.6410 • F: 573.634 .6562 • www .jeffersonc itymo .gov
Date : July 12 , 2022
To: Public Works and Planning Committee
From:
Subject:
David Bange P.E., City Engineer ·~
Vacation of Atchison Court
Staff is requesting the committee approve the recommendation to vacate Atchison Court and would
support providing a thin lift overlay ..
At the last Public Works and Planning Committee the possibility of vacating Atchison Court was
discussed. It was suggested that staff have further conversations with University personnel to vet any
issues that may exist in relation to this vacation . To that end we have had discussions with Jeff Turner
with the Office of Facilities and Planning with Lincoln University . In those discussions Mr. Turner did not
voice any objection but indicated that the street should be repaired prior to it being vacated .
If there is a desire to vacate the street staff sees three alternatives:
1. Vacating the street in its current state
);> No cost
2. Placing a thin lift cap on the street using the City's own forces.
);> Staff time plus the cost of materials which are estimated to be approximately $4,500
3. Milling and overlaying the street in a manne r similar to a typical street overlay .
);> Based on the cost of our street overlay program this would cost in the range of $12,000
In case 2 and 3 funding would need to be identified to cover these costs .
If you have any questions you may contact me at 634-6433 .
U:\Public Works\Engineeringldbange \PUBLIC WORKS & PlANNING\2022\Atchison Ct..docx
Atchison Court
Department of Public Works Memorandum
320 E. McCarty Street • Jefferson City, Missouri 65101 • P 573-634-6410 • F 573-634-6562 • www .jeffcitymo .org
Date: July 11, 2022
To: Public Work and Planning Committee
From: Britt E. Smith, P.E.
Subject: Parking Mobile Payment
Staff recommends:
• Institution of a mobile payment parking app option with the addition of a
convenience fee intended to cover the banking fees paid by the parking fund
(requires a no upfront cost contract with the vendor executed by the City
Administrator);
• Increase the parking time on 100 Madison, 100 West Capital Ave, 100, 200, and
300 East Capital Ave . from the current maximum parking time to 10 hours;
• Setting a rate of $1 per hour for the parking in those blocks referenced above as
well as the 100 block of Jefferson St (currently a 10-hour zone); and
• Increasing the minimum fine amount for an expired long-term meter to be 10
times the hourly rate for the zone plus an additional $20 .
At the direction of the committee, staff has been researching moving to mobile
payments for metered parking as well as adding more available long -term spaces close
to the Capital Building. Our current vendor for parking enforcement software can easily
added this feature. The change would require placing additional street signage as well
as signage on individual meters throughout downtown .
The software vendor would change a $0.25 fee per transaction which would be passed
on to the customer and as the parking fund would be require to cover the credit card
fees we would recommend increasing that charge to $0.50 to help offset the cost of
those fees.
Code modification would be required to increase the rate, extend the parking time limit
and increase the minimum fine amount.
cc: Matt Morasch, P.E.
Memorandum
320EastMcCartyStreet • JeffersonCity,Missouri6510l • P: 573.634.6410 • F: 573.634 .6562 • www.jeffersoncitymo .gov
Date: July 12, 2022
To: Public Works and Planning Committee
From: David Bange P .E., City Engineer
Subject: Program for Addressing Private Stormwater Systems
Staff is presenting the committee with a means to address private stormwater systems through the
expansion of the Neighborhood Improvement Program (NIP) that is currently used for citizen requested
sidewalk and curb and gutter projects.
The attached language is a draft integration of private stormwater systems into the existing code
language of the NIP . In summary this would require a signed petition from all owners affected, approval
of the project by the Council along with identifying funding , and dedication of a stormwater easement by
the owners .
The suggested owner participation is set at $80 per foot which is based on the current cost to line a
fifteen-inch diameter pipe . The language establishes the property owner as being responsible for the
replacement of all improvements necessarily removed for the installation of the stormwater system .
If you recall earlier in the year we discussed the stormwater system at 2213 W . Edgewood Drive. In this
scenario the cost to the property owner would be $9,440, while the City's cost would be $39,300.
If you have any questions you may contact me at 634-6433.
U:\Public Works\Engineering\dbange\PUBLIC WORKS & PLANNING\2022\Funding Priv ate Stormwater.docx
Inclusion of Private Stormwater System Upgrade Projects To City Standards
• DIVISION 4. -NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
• Sec. 32-60.-Purpose.
The purpose of this article is to provide encouragement and cooperation for the making of
improvements to streets, sidewalks , private stormwater systems to City standards, and other
infrastructure through a voluntary program of citizen participation in cost.
(Ord. No. 16023 , § 1, 4-6-2020)
• Sec. 32-61.-Petition necessary.
For each project which may be eligible for inclusion in the City's neighborhood improvement project
(NIP), a petition shall be submitted by the owners of the requisite front footage, or private stormwater
system to be upgraded with easement granted to the City, as specified in this article by March 1 of each
year for consideration for the following year's fiscal budget to the Director of Public Works. Petitions
shall be considered approved if the project is identified and funded in the following year's budget.
Petitions shall be considered denied if not funded in the following year's budget or withdrawn by
counter petition. Any denied petition shall not be carried over to the next budget year.
(Ord. No. 16023 . § 1, 4-6-2020)
• Sec. 32-62. -Participation requirement.
Property owners may petition the City Council, on a form approved by the Director of Public Works, to
construct projects which involve the rebuilding of any curb and gutter, 9-f sidewalks, or private
stormwater systems to City standards for an entire block, or agreed upon drainage system segment,
which shall be petitioned by greater than 75 percent of the owners of the front footage abutting the
proposed projects. Private stormwater system upgrades shall be petitioned by 100% of the owners
upon whose property the agreed upon drainage system resides . Additionally, due to cost reduction,
private stormwater system upgrade projects will not replace trees, fences, concrete flatwork, retaining
walls or sod, but will be at the expense of the petitioner.
(Ord . No. 16023 . § 1, 4-6-2020)
• Sec. 32-63. -Cost to applicant.
A. For each project included in the NIP and funded, the cost to each abutting property owner shall be
set by the City Administrator each year in appendix Y.
B. At least 75 percent of abutting property owners and 100 percent for private stormwater system
upgrades must agree to prepay the entire amount of their cost-share prior to approval of the
construction contract by the City Council or City Administrator.
C. Any party which fails to prepay the party's full cost-share of the project shall be charged an additional
25 percent. Such person's share shall be placed as a lien against the property as part of a tax bill
pursuant to section 32-40, 32-41, and 32-42 of the City Code.
(Ord. No. 16023 , § 1, 4-6-2020)
• Sec. 32-64. -Funding, criteria for project selection.
In determining which, if any, projects shall be funded the following criteria will be considered:
A. Funding available.
B. Number of properties affected.
C. Existing conditions.
D. Property share prepaid vs. tax bill.
E. Overall effect on area.
(Ord. No. 16023 , § 1, 4-6-2020)
• Sec. 32-65. -Street lighting in improved subdivisions.
A. Where street lighting doesn't meet the minimum requirements of 33-9.E. Abutting property owners
may petition the City for street lighting. The Director of Public Works may approve street lighting
request, within budget constraints based on the following criteria.
1. Installation of the street lights will generally be at spacings no less than 250 feet (residential) and 180
feet (commercial).
2. The spacing may be less than in A.1 at locations of abrupt horizontal or vertical grade changes when
needed for traffic safety.
3. The City may grant additional lighting on the basis of high concentration of pedestrian traffic such as
downtown, school areas, serious traffic hazards, or high incidence of crime as determined by the Chief
of Police. The latter would not relieve the property owner of the responsibility of security lighting.
B. Property owners requesting lighting would pay 25 percent (residential) and 50 percent (commercial)
for installation and the City would install and pay for maintenance and operation when installation is
approved.
C. Objections to the decision of the Director of Public Works with respect to placing of street lighting
can be appealed to the City Council within 30 days of the decision of the Director of Public Works.
(O rd. No . 16023 , § 1, 4 -6 -2020}
• Sees. 32-66-32-69.-Reserved.
APPENDIX Y-SCHEDULE OF ADMINISTRATIVE FEES, PERMITS, LICENSES AND OTHER CHARGES
I Cha pt e r I Secti o n I Section Ti t le Fee
32 3 33 Neighborhood Im p rove men t Prog ram $27 .00 per li near f oo t -sidewalk
$80.00 per linear foot-private stormwater
system upgrade projects
.JEF RAN
• connecting our community
Department of Public Works Memorandum
320 E. McCarty Street • Jefferson City, Missouri 65101 • P 573 -6 34-6410 • F 573-634-6562 • www .jeffcitymo .org
Date:
To:
From:
Subject:
July 8, 2022
Public Works and Planning Committee
Public Transit Advisory Committee
Mark Mehmert, Transit Director
Review of recent transit studies
Due to demographic and economic change over time, it is considered a best practice in the field to
assess a transit system approximately every seven years. The following is a brief synopsis of recent
studies.
2016-2017 System-Wide Assessment
This study was under the auspices of JEFFTRAN's planning partners at the Capital Area Metropolitan
Planning Organization (CAMPO), and focused on evaluating transit routes, services and operating
policies while developing corresponding recommendations.
The contractor conducted on-board surveys of JEFFTRAN riders, consulted with stakeholders via
public meetings and interviews as well as evaluated financial data and compared JEFFTRAN to peer
cities. JEFFTRAN's fare structure has not changed since 2007 . A fare increase had been proposed
in 2015, but was not adopted by the City Council.
Study recommendations
• Fixed routes
o Partner with LU for universal service (implemented)
o Extend weekday hours of service to 7:20 PM on 4 routes
o Operate Saturday service on those same 4 routes from 8:00AM to 5:20 PM.
o Revise fixed route names, incorporating colors for more clarity (implemented)
o Raise fares 25 cents on fixed route service
o Significantly modify routes for "bi-directional travel", increasing frequency but eliminating
service in certain areas
o Add a morning and evening "tripper" route for service near the Westview Heights
neighborhood
o Proposed a "Holts Summit Express" and an "Algoa Shuttle"
• Handiwheels
o Re-certify the eligibility of paratransit (Handiwheels) clients (implemented)
o Offer free fixed route service to Handiwheels clients
o Revise the paratransit eligibility application (implemented)
o Re-allocating savings from these actions to fixed route recommendations
Outcome
The recommended changes to hours and routes were calculated to cost $454,000.
While insufficient savings were realized to implement fixed route recommendations and expansions of
service, the transit division budget has remained relatively static.
It should be noted bi-directional route service in a more concentrated area would have resulted in
reduction or elimination of service to a large portion of the city's western areas. For example, the
proposed would have resulted in an "on call" only service situation for St. Mary's Hospital after $200
million in private investment in the facility in 2014.
2010 TranSystems transit facilities feasibility
Since the end of the useful life of Transit Division facilities (including Central Maintenance) was
approaching, in 2010 a study was commissioned to evaluate the existing facilities and make
recommendations regarding potential sites for replacement facilities.
In 2010, the study contractor conducted a physical and functional analysis of each building and
structure. The contractor concluded all six existing facilities were inadequate and recommended
replacement, noting the existing space was not readily expandable and was congested.
At the time, the estimated cost of to develop replacement facilities was approximately $5.5 million,
excluding the potential redevelopment of the historic Masonic Lodge.
Subsequent budget constraints after the study meant in repeated delays in potential grant
applications.
2006 TranSystems Transit Development Plan
This study was sponsored by CAMPO and had a wide purview, tasked with developing
"recommendations for the future of transit within Jefferson City." At the time, JEFFTRAN was a
division of the Department of Community Development.
The contractor conducted six stakeholder meetings, held one public meeting collected data from an
online survey. They also interviewed JEFFTRAN staff, including bus drivers and dispatchers.
JEFFTRAN's fare structure at the time was 50 cents for a regular fare and $1.00 for a Handiwheels
fare.
At the time, JEFFTRAN operated 7 routes with 4 daily trippers. The state shuttle was also in
operation. Hours of all operations were 7:00 AM to 5:30 PM.
Study recommendations
Operationally, the contractor recommended moving from 30-minute headings to 40-minute headings
to alleviate bus schedules which were not physically able to be completed on time.
Based on public input, they also recommended extending weekday hours from 6:30 AM to 6:30 PM
and Saturday service from 7:30AM to 5:30PM.
This service evaluation recommended moving the transfer point from the Downtown area to the
current location at 820 E. Miller St.
The TranSystems study recommended formulating a marketing plan to "encourage people to use the
bus, but also to assure people that the bus system is a worthy community investment." While not a
full marketing plan, some suggested ideas were a universal pass with Lincoln University, a Summer
Youth Pass and Public Service Announcements (PSAs).
At the time, JEFFTRAN was in the midst of acquiring low-floor, heavy-duty Gillig buses for fixed route
service. The contractor endorsed these acquisitions, indicating "the service operated by JEFFTRAN
warrants heavy duty transit coaches from the standpoint of passenger loadings, volumes and
operating conditions."
Outcome
The recommendation to change to 40-minute headings was implemented in 2010.
The recommended hours changes were estimated to cost approximately $381,000. While weekday
hours were extended to the present operating hours of 6:40 AM to 6:00 PM, the other hours of
operation options were not implemented.
The recommendation to move the main transfer point from Downtown Jefferson City to JEFFTRAN's
820 E. Miller facility was implemented with the addition of basic shelter and restroom facilities.
Estimated costs associated with the marketing plan was $52,000. The marketing plan was not
implemented. However, some of the components were also recommended in the 2016-2017 plan or
(in the case of the Summer Youth Pass) were implemented for a very short time period on a trial
basis.
All of the Gillig buses recommended by the contractor are still in service.
Department of Public Works Memorandum
320 E. Mc Carty Street • Jeffers o n City, Missouri 65101 • P 573-634-641 0 • F 573-634-6562 • www .jeffcitymo .org
Date: July 12, 2022
To: Public Work and Planning Committee
From : Britt E. Smith, P.E.
Subject: Additional Funding for the 2022 Street Surface Maintenance Program
Staff recommends that if funding is going to be added into the current year's street
maintenance program that a funding ordinance with change order authorization be
brought forward to the Council at the next meeting.
As the committee may remember, due to funding concerns four streets were removed
from our street surface maintenance program due to funding limitation caused by
inflationary factors. These streets are listed on the attached list and highlighted in
yellow . At the time, several council members have stated a desire to finding funding for
those streets cut from the program.
The cost to do these streets is estimated to be $236,713 .31 ($48,490.56 for the micro-
surface contract and $188,222 .75 in the overlay contract). As these amounts in both
contracts exceed 1 0 % of the original contracts, Council authorization for the change
orders are required by city code .
If th e se additional streets will be completed we will need to notify the contractors as
soon as possible so they may plan accordingly in the schedules of work to avoid
request for additional cost to cover multiply mobilizations .
cc: Matt Morasch, P.E .
Attachment
Preliminary Street Overlay List Summary
Dated Rev ised: May 25, 2022
LOCATION FROM TO ane COST LIST Miles
c;; Antietam Ct. 2022 4 y Gettyburg PI End 0.17
::J FeJtOOre ~ 4 ¥ NOO-HiH feflffete Q.d..&
<U Gettyburb PI Shermans Hollow End (.) 2022 4 1.12 ~ Greystone Dr 2022 4 Concrete Gettysburg PL 0 .64 ::J
(j) ~ ~ 4 Fairwa)' Dr. feflffete ~ e
(.) Shanon Dale Ct 2022 4 Greystone Dr End 0.34 ~ Sherwood Dr 2022 4 Concrete End 0 .84
N Taylors Ridge Ct 2022 4 Sherwood Dr End 0 .32 N
0
N Tylers Run Ct 2022 4 Sherwood Dr End 0 .27
Sub-Total 3.68 $202,736
Norris Dr. 2022 3 Boonville Road Concrete 0.65
Truman B lvd 2022 3 Amazonas Dr. Ventura Dr . 0 .23
Truman Blvd 2022 3 N Ten Mile Dr. Scott Station Rd . 2 .73
Truman Blvd 2022 3 Scott Station Rd . Amazonas Dr 0.53
Truman Blvd 2022 3 Ventura Dr. W Truman PI (P) 0.56
Q)~ Truman Blvd 2022 3 y W Truman PI (P) Country Club Dr. 0.78
~...J Burehrle Dr. 2022 4 y Satinwood Dr. Edgewood Dr. 1 .27 ->-(J) ro Dogwood Dr. 2022 4 y Buehrle Dr. Edgewood Dr. 0 .39 N't:
N <U Dogwood Dr. 2022 4 y Stdium Blvd . Buehrle Dr. 0 .18 0 >
N O Lynnwood Dr. 2022 4 Stadium Blvd . Buehrle Dr. 0 .27
Melody Dr. 2022 4 y Satinwood Dr. Pondarosa Rd . 0.73
Pondarosa Rd . 2022 4 y Buehrle Dr . Edgewood Dr. 0 .38
s ... lifts l=l'.v;. ~ 4 eel§e•.veea QF. Se~o~!l=l•.ves! 131v8. (}..W
E:llis Blva ~ & GFee nbe ny Ra. Re se we ea QF. 4-,97
Greenberry Rd. 2022 5 Ellis Blvd . City Limits 1.41
Sub-Total 10.11 $831,179
Armory Alley 2022 2 St. Marys Blvd End of City Maint. 0 .12
Armory Dr. 2022 2 St. Marys Blvd End of City Maint. 0 .1 7
Ashley St. 2022 2 Madison St. Jefferson St. 0 .22
Broadway St. 2022 2 W. Main St. W . High St. 0.51
Cherry St. 2022 2 Miller St. McCarty St. 0 .1 9
Chestnut St. 2022 2 Bridge (MoDOT) McCarty St. 0 .21
N High St 2022 2 Jefferson St. Washington St. 0.41
0 High St 2022 2 Washington St. Broadway St. 0.30 N
.5 Miller St. E . 2022 2 Cherry St. Laffayette 0.30
'C Miller St. E . 2022 2 Chestnut St. Cherry St. 0 .16 '(ij
~ Miller St. E. 2022 2 Clark Ave Chestnut St. 0 .83
- > St Marys Blvd 2022 2 Armory Dr Gipfert Ln 1.24 3lo
~"' St Marys Blvd 2022 2 Gipfert Ln Dead End 1.20 (J)Q)
N~ N -Williams St. 2022 2 Di x Rd Beck St. 0 .24
O(J)
N ~ Industrial Dr 2022 3 Dix Rd Wilson Dr. 0.99
c;; Industrial Dr 2022 3 Norman Dr. Jaycee Dr. 1 .59 ::J Industrial Dr 2022 3 Wilson Dr. Norman Dr. 1.24 (ij
0 Meadow Broo k Ct. 2022 3 Rock Creek Terr. Dead End 0.22 ()
(ij Meadow Brook Dr. 2022 3 Meadow Brook Ct. Valley View Terr. 0.29
<U Rock Creek Terr. 2022 3 Valley Park Dr. Meadow Brook Ct. 0.37 (j)
Valley Park Dr. 2022 3 Country Club Dr. Valley View Terr. 0.57
Valley View Ct. 2022 3 Valley View Terr. Dead End 0.58
Valley View Terr . 2022 3 Valley View Ct. Dead End 0 .89
Clover Ln 2022 5 Payne St. Green meadow 0.16
Green Meadow Dr. 2022 5 Whitney Woods Dr. North End 1 .68
Payne St. 2022 5 Greenberry Rd . Brookside Dr. 0 .65
Sub-Total 15.33 $93 ,987
Yearly Total 29.13 $1 ,127,901
Stre et removed from t hi s yea r's work plan for budg et re asons .
Page 1 of 3
LOCATION
2:-Mercedes Ln .
"' ~ o Pinehurst Ct.
~ ·E -~ Turnberry Ct.
N ~ ::2: Turnberry Dr
o... Willow Lake Ct.
Hough St.
S. Lincoln St.
Willconxon Dr
Binder Dr.
Hillsdale Dr.
Marilynn Dr.
Oakview Dr.
Schumate Chapel Rd .
Schumate Chapel Rd .
Willow St.
Bassman Rd.
Crestmere Ct.
Qj Eagle Trace ~ en_ Glenwood Dr.
~~ Oak Leaf Dr.
c: >-Overlook Dr. .E ~ Parkway Rd. E. = (!)
(!) > Parkway Rd. N . c\:0
"' Red Oak Dr.
N
0 Stone Briar Rd N
Sun Meadow Ln .
Turnberry Dr.
Westwood Dr.
Westwood Dr.
Windsor St.
Bluebird Ln
Dixon
Flamingo Rd
ldlewood Rd
ldlewood Rd
Meadowlark Ln
Starling Dr.
Preliminary Street Overlay List Summary
Dated Revised: May 25, 2022
FROM TO ane COST LIST Miles
2023 3 Schumate Chapel Rd . Schumate Chaple Rd . 0.60
2023 4 Turnberry Dr. End 0 .26
2023 4 Turnberry Dr End 1 .39
2023 4 Willow La ke Ct. Turnberry Dr 1.25
2023 4 Turnberry Dt. End 0 .19
2023 Grant St. Riverside Dr. 1 .18
2023 y McCarty St. Hough Park Rd . 0.56
2023 1 0 .36
2023 3 Oakview Dr. Livingston St. 1.08
2023 3 Oakview Dr. Binder Dr. 0 .31
2023 3 Binder Dr. Forest Hill Ave . 0 .81
2023 3 Binder Dr. Marilyn St. 0.57
2023 3 Truman Blvd . Unilever Entrance 0 .27
2023 3 y Unilever Entrance City Limits 1.04
2023 3 W. Main St. Belair Dr. 0 .28
2023 4 y Westwood Dr. Southwest Blvd . 0.40
2023 4 Westwood Dr. Parkway Rd . N. 0 .51
2023 4 End End 0.43
2023 4 Crestmere Ct. Southwest Blvd . 0.34
2023 4 y Jefferson St. Red Oak Dr. 0.24
2023 4 Route C Cedar Hill Rd 1 .18
2023 4 y Parkway Rd. N . Glenwood Dr. 0 .13
2023 4 y Crestmere Ct. Parkway Rd . E . 0 .12
2023 4 y Southridge Dr. Oak Leaf Dr. 0.47
2023 4 y Turnberry Dr. Eagle Trace 0.15
2023 4 y Overlook Dr. South End Overlook Dr . North End 0.36
2023 4 y Country Club W illow Lake Ct. 1.25
2023 4 y Tower Dr. Southwest Blvd . 0.68
2023 4 y Woodclift Dr. Tower Dr. 0.39
2023 4 y Westwood Dr. Tower Dr. 0 .31
2023 5 0 .53
2023 5 y Greenberry Rd . Hough Park Rd . 0 .74
2023 5 y 0.40
2023 5 y Bluebird Meadowlark Ln 0 .28
2023 5 y ldlewood Ct Bluebird 1.05
2023 5 y 0.60
2023 5 y 0 .57
Yearly Estimated Total 21.27 $1,466,557.43
Page 2 of 3
Preliminary Street Overlay List Summary
Dated Revised: May 25, 2022
LOCATION FROM TO ane COST LIST Miles
Camzie Dr . 2024 5 y lven Rd. Hoffman Dt. 0 .69
Hoffman Dr. 2024 5 y Concrete End 0.25
Bellevue Ct 2024 2 y Hawthorne Parkway End 0.14
Darlene Dr 2024 2 y Linden Dr Pamela Dr. 0.57
Dix Rd. 2024 2 y Industrial Dr. W. Main St 0.60
Hawthorne Parkway 2024 2 y Linden Dr Bellevue Ct 0.19
Holly Dr 2024 2 y Linden Dr Minnesota Ave 0 .36
Indiana Ave 2024 2 y Nebraska Ave End 0.19
Indiana/Minnesota Ave 2024 2 y Minnesota Ave Indiana Ave 0.10
Jefferson St. 2024 2 y Asheley St Atchison St 0.29
iii Jefferson St. 2024 2 Atchison St. Hwy 54 Bridge 0.99
::J Jefferson St. 2024 2 Dunklin St. Ashley St 0.52 Q) u Jefferson St. 2024 2 Expressway Dunklin St. 0 .34 c
Cll Jefferson St. 2024 2 y Hwy 54 Bridge Stadium Blvd 0.13 c
$ Laurel Dr 2024 2 y Linden Dr Minnesota Ave 0.31 c ·n; Linden Dr 2024 2 y Filmore St. Darlene Dr. 0.82 ::2
a; Madison St. 2024 2 y Ashley St. Atchison St 0 .32
~ Madison St. 2024 2 y Atchison St. Frankl in St. 0.63
U5 Madison St. 2024 2 y Concrete Ashley St 0.19
2:-Madison St. 2024 2 y Franklin St. Hwy 54 On Ramp 0.45 Cll c Minnesota Ave 2024 2 y Indiana/Minnesota Ave End 0.20 :~
~ Boonville Rd. 2024 3 y Belmont Dr. Hwy 179 2.14
Q._ Boonville Rd. 2024 3 y Livingston Belmont Dr. 1.66
""'" Boonville Rd . 2024 3 y W. Main St. Livingston St. 2.05 N
0 Brookgreen Dr. 2024 5 Cimarron Dr. End 0.31 N
Carousel Dr. 2024 5 Merlin Dt. Tanner Bridge Rd 0.41
Cimarron Dr. 2024 5 Tanner Bridge Rd Brookgreen Dr. 0 .64
Field Haven Dr. 2024 5 Knight Valley Dr. Park Crest Dr. 0.15
Hoffman Dt. 2024 5 Tanner Bridge Rd lven Rd. 0 .54
lven Rd. 2024 5 Hoffman Dr. End 0 .50
King Arthur Dr. 2024 5 Carousel Dr. End 0 .18
Knight Valley Dr. 2024 5 Carousel Dr. Field Haven Dr. 0.45
Knight Va ll ey Dr. 2024 5 Field Haven Dr. Concrete 0.11
Merlin Dr. 2024 5 Cimarron Dr. Carousel Dr. 0.76
Park Crest Dr. 2024 5 Field Haven Dr. Hoffman Dt. 0.51
Yearly Estimated Total 18.72 $1,485,198.63
Hillsdale Dr. 2025 3 Binder Dr. Belair Dr. 0 .74
Industrial Dr 2025 2 Argonne St. Hughes St. 0 .90
Industrial Dr 2025 2 Hart St. Argonne St. 0.82
iii Industrial Dr 2025 2 McCarty St. Hart St. 1.16
::J High St 2025 1 Lafayette St. Jackson St. 0.71
Ql Atchison St. 2025 2 Adams St. Jackson St. 0 .19 u c Carter 2025 2 Swifts Hwy Stadium 0.58 Cll c High St 2025 2 Broadway St. Viaduct 0.44 ~ ·a; High St 2025 2 Jackson St. Adams St. 0.39
::2 Belair Dr. 2025 3 Twin Hills Boonvill e Rd 0.95
a; Eastern Air 2025 3 Southen Air Airview Dr. 0.28 ~ Jaycee Dr. 2025 3 Industrial Dr. W. Main St 0.38 U5
2:-Jaycee Dr. 2025 3 Industrial Dr. Sche ll ridge Rd . East 1.21
Cll Royal Air Dr. 2025 3 Belair Dr. Airview Dr . 0.26 c
:~ Twin Hill Rd. 2025 3 Belair Dr. Sue Dr. 1.02
~ Holiday Dr. 2025 5 Chestnut St. End 0.20
Q._ lsom Dr. 2025 5 Hough Park Rd Major Dr. 0.31 10
N Jobe 2025 5 Hough Park Rd Cul-de-sac 0.53 0
N Kolb Dr 2025 5 Hough Park Rd Major Dr. 0.33
Major Dr. 2025 5 Hough Park Rd. Kolb Dr. 0.61
Winston Ct. 2025 5 Chestnut St. End 0.28
Winston Dr. 2025 5 Holiday Dr. Hough Park Rd . 1.49
Yearly Estimated Total 13.77 $1,082,301.40
Total 4 Year Program Estimated Cost $5 ,161 ,958 .31
Page 3 of 3
Summary
Public Works & Planning StaffReport
Capital Area Active Transportation Plan
July 14 , 2022
CAMPO (Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Commission) has begun the process of developing the Capital
Area Active Transportation Plan. The planning process includes staff working with consultants Crafton Tuii
and LaneShift, to incorporate and replace the foiiowing plans:
• Capital Area Pedestrian & Bicycle Plan (2016)
• Jefferson City 's Sidewalk Plan (2010)
• Greenway Master Plan (2007)
• Holts Summit Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Transit Plan (2014).
The Capital Area Active Transportation Plan covers all CAMPO communities and will take place over the next
12 to 15 months. The plan will generally include the following:
• comprehensive set of strategies to ensure better options for biking, walking, and transit
• recommendations for prioritizing infrastructure improvements
• outline recommendations for new policies , processes , and infrastructure
• base recommendations on a robust public and stakeholder involvement campaign
Funding for this project totals $125,000 and is provided via the CAMPO Consolidated Planning Grant
($1 00,000), with match provided by JC Parks ($25 ,000).
A public engagement campaign will start in late summer 2022 , including public events and meetings , staff
presentations , steering committee meetings, and stakeholder interviews. Comments are encouraged throughout
the planning process and can be sent to campo@jeffersoncitymo.gov. Any questions can be sent to Katrina
Wiiiiams at kawilliams@jeffersoncitymo.gov.
A detailed scope of services and timeline is attached.
Exhibit "A"
Scope of Basic Services For:
Project: CAMPO Active Transportation Plan
Client: Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization
Location of Project: City of Jefferson , MO
Discipline: Planning
Discipline Manager: Julie Luther Kelso
Project Manager: Julie Luther Kelso
Proposal Date: 03/23/22
Billing Type: Fixed Fee
Fee/Estimate: $125 ,000
Description of the Planning Project: Active Transportation Planning Services
TASK 1: PROJECT KICK-OFF, EXISTING FACILTIES, VISIONING, AND ONGOING COORDINATION
At the outset of the project, Crafton Tull (Consultant) will work with the Capital Area Metropolitan Planning
Organization (Client) to refine the overall project strategy and initiate coordination with past or ongoing studies
and projects in the study area.
Task 1 .1 Virtual Kick-off Meeting and Project Management
The CTA Team will begin the project with a virtual kick-off meeting with the Client to confirm the objectives for
the project. As necessary, the kick-off meeting will address the following key project issues:
1. Provide a forum for meeting participants to identify opportunities and challenges that this project
will face, and to establish the objectives that must be accomplished through this work.
2. Discuss the project schedule, including the key milestones, deliverables and meetings.
3. Discuss the availability of GIS and/or other base data and plan documents that will be needed for
the project.
It is understood that CAMPO staff will subsequently meet with individual jurisdictions to present the project
process and timeline.
Task 1.2 Ongoing Project Coordination
Throughout the project, Crafton Tull will coordinate progress, decision points, and next steps with the client or
client team. Monthly project update meetings will be held to discuss these and any project issues as they arise .
www.craftontull.com
Task 1.3 Public Engagement Plan
Crafton Tull will outline a public engagement plan based on this scope of services that specifies workshop
agendas, focus groups, and outreach efforts that may be completed by the consultant team or client throughout
the planning process.
Task 1.4 Previous Plans Review and Assessment
The CTA Team will review all previous plans relevant to this study and assess major themes, identify areas of
consensus and areas of contradiction, and compile a summary document to be utilized during the visioning
process with the steering committee and the public to confirm which components have been achieved, which
ones carry forward with continued relevance, and which ones no longer apply. This assessment will determine
the framework of the consolidated Active Transportation Plan. The Crafton Tull Team will conduct a virtual
meeting with the client to review the assessment and key outcomes of existing plans.
Task 1.5 Collect Existing GIS Data and Develop Base Maps
To conduct the analyses described in this scope, the Consultant will need a wide v_ariety of GIS and base data,
including street attribute data, built and natural environment components, planning and parcel data, and
analytical and planning outputs from previous planning efforts.
The following GIS data is requested to conduct the project:
• Roadway centerline files with road name, classification, posted speed limit, ADT, number of travel
lanes, lane widths and overall roadway width, direction (one-way vs. two way)
• Existing bicycle and pedestrian traffic counts
• Locations and descriptions of planned transportation infrastructure improvements
• Existing and planned trails and greenways, sidewalks, and on-and off-road bicycle facilities
• Right of way extents
• Bicycle and pedestrian crash data over the past 5 years
• Travel Demand Model and Scenario Planning Outputs
• Analysis data previously completed for this project
• Locations of signalized intersections
• Transit routes and stops
• Contours
• Locations of physical barriers such as sidewalk disconnects, major highways, rail lines, rivers and
streams, steep terrain, and other barriers
• On-street parking restrictions
• Parcel layers indicating public or private land ownership
• Major employment and activity centers
• Locations of major bicycle and pedestrian destinations (including schools, colleges, libraries, parks
and open spaces, senior centers, social service sites, community centers, sporting venues, tourist
destinations,' hospitals, and other activity centers)
• Locations of planned residential or commercial development
• Land use (current and proposed)
www.craftontull.com 2
• Zoning
• Population, employment, and travel data (by census block group and traffic analysis zone)
• Aerial photography of the study area
Under guidance of the Client, Crafton lull will use data provided by Client and request additional data through
contact with planning, transportation, park and/or public data management.
Task 1.6 Existing Facilities and Existing Conditions Analysis
Using the base data obtained in Task 1.5, Crafton lull will develop or revise a map of existing on-and off-road
bicycle (not including unpaved trails) and pedestrian facilities across the study area (to the extent data is
available). The map will show locations and types of facilities, and will include supplementary information such
as locations of parks, schools, transit routes and other key generators of bicycling and walking trips.
Road suitability analysis maps as well as trip generator analysis maps will also be produced, which assist in the
determination of future network recommendations.
Task 1. 7 Sidewalk Inventory
CAMPO staff will provide an inventory of existing sidewalks within the study area, including locations of
continuous existing sidewalks in good or suitable condition, locations of deteriorating sidewalks or major
sidewalk gaps, and completeness of the sidewalk on one or both sides of the street as generalized on a per-block
basis.
Task 1.8 WORKSHOP 1: Envisioning the Future
The Crafton lull Team will conduct a three-day workshop with the steering committee, stakeholders, and the
public to confirm previous public engagement outcomes as well as identify new goals and strategies that will be
carried forward through the CAMPO Active Transportation Plan. The Crafton lull Team will be responsible for
developing meeting materials, handouts and presentations. The Client will be responsible for arranging the
meeting venue and logistics, as well as distributing meeting notifications.
• Client and Consultant Site Tour
The Crafton lull Team will participate in a half day site tour with CAMPO staff to visit key locations
within the study area. These may include recent infrastructure projects, areas of concern, key
destinations within the community, major connectivity barriers, and/or areas of high pedestrian or
bicycle use. CAMPO staff will be responsible for organizing this overview.
• Steering Committee Meeting 1: Vision & Goals
The Crafton lull Team will conduct a visioning session with the Project Steering Committee to define the
overall vision and goals for bicycling and walking in the CAMPO region, including existing and desired
routes for active transportation and important destinations within the community. During this
discussion, the Steering Committee will help the Consultant understand the City's transportation policy,
land use policy, development patterns, existing programs and other factors that will contribute to a high
quality bicycle and pedestrian environment in the community. Crafton lull will develop the draft vision
and goals statement based on this discussion .
www.craftontull.com 3
• Stakeholder Group Meetings
The Crafton Tull Team will conduct four stakeholder groups over a period of one morning and one
afternoon to discuss opportunities and barriers to walking and cycling, efforts to build a culture of
walking and bicycling, existing efforts underway that affect the active transportation network, and
desired outcomes of the project as well as the network. It is anticipated that these groups will include:
• Healthcare
• Education
• Public Safety
• Chamber/CVB and Business Owners
• Bicycle/Pedestrian Advocates
• Elected Officials & Government Staff
• Public Meeting 1
The first Public Meeting will be used to gather insight from the general public and interested
stakeholders. The meeting will have the following objectives:
• Provide an overview to the benefits of providing a culture for active transportation
• Provide input into the vision/goals for walkability, bikeability, and trails in the community, including
those identified in previous planning efforts
• Solicit input on issues and concerns regarding pedestrian access, bicycle connectivity, and safety
throughout the City
• Offer an opportunity for participants to document bicycle and pedestrian issues they are aware of in
their community or routes they currently travel or would like to travel
• Discuss important current and future destinations in the community
Task 1 Deliverab/es:
• Kick-off meeting materials
• Draft Vision and Goals for the project
• Existing Facilities map(s)
• Public Meeting 1 maps, graphics, presentation, and outcomes
TASK 2: PRELIMINARY NETWORK, CONDITIONS ASSESSMENT, AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This task includes an assessment of existing infrastructure, as well as plan to establish a baseline for active
transportation across the study area considering both on-street facilities, sidewalks, and paved trails.
Task 2.1 Develop Study Network
Crafton Tull will define a preliminary network for field assessment based upon the analysis and input received in
Task 1. The Consultant will identify critical gaps in the community bicycle and pedestrian netwqrk. This analysis
will include:
www.craftontull.com 4
• locations where bike and pedestrian facilities end prior to key destinations, or do not sufficiently
connect to other facilities (such as trail entrances)
• relevant locations in the study area that are not currently served by the pedestrian and bicycle network,
• existing pedestrian and bicycle locations where a significant safety issue exists,
• major barriers to bicycle and pedestrian travel, such as wide arterial streets, rail lines, water bodies, etc.
Task 2.2 Assess Study Network
Crafton lull will evaluate the route network to define barriers and opportunities as well as general connectivity
issues throughout the study area. The Consultant will assess connectivity in the proposed network through
detailed field assessments and documentation . Crafton lull will develop specific recommendations to create an
active transportation network.
The Project Team will incorporate the findings from the field work into a project database. Maps will be
developed illustrating recommended facility types.
Task 2.3 Preliminary Active Transportation Network Development
Based on the information gathered in previous task, field work, and review of relevant local and regional plans,
Crafton lull will develop recommendations for the active transportation network. These recommendations will
consist of the following:
• key linkages for bicycle and pedestrian connectivity,
• major bicycle and pedestrian facilities (including paved off road trails, greenways, etc.),
• any other facilities that have been determined to be of significance
• specific facility type recommendations for each proposed route
• general intersection treatments necessary to accommodate the active transportation network
Task 2.4 Client Review of Preliminary Network
The Crafton lull Team will conduct a virtual meeting with the Client to review the preliminary network.
Task 2.5 Workshop 2: The Path Forward
The Crafton lull Team will conduct a second workshop to present the preliminary active transportation network
and gather feedback, and conduct walk audits with the steering committee and stakeholders to evaluate
walkability in key areas ofthe CAMPO region.
The Crafton lull Team will be responsible for developing meeting materials, handouts and presentations. The
Client will be responsible for arranging the meeting venue and logistics, as well as distributing meeting
notifications.
• Steering Committee Meeting
The Steering Committee will meet to review Network Recommendations as well as Case Study
alternatives and provide input for developing prioritization criteria and action steps.
www.craftontull.com 5
• Walk Audits
The Crafton Tull Team will conduct a series of three interactive walk audits (one in conjunction with the
steering committee, one with stakeholders, and one with elected officials) to develop placemaking
concepts and solutions for circulation (vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle}, parking, universal access, low
impact development concepts, wayfinding, beautification, and community character improvement. A
brief summary of the walk audits will be prepared that includes a list of opportunities and constraints
identified at the event.
• Public Meeting 2
The second meeting will be used to share the preliminary active transportation network. The meeting
will have the following objectives:
• Discuss best practices in facility type selection, design, and application and how these practices are
applied within the CAMPO study area
• Educate local citizens and stakeholder groups about successful solutions to common pedestrian and
bicycle deficiencies
• Share information discovered during analysis and field assessments, and discuss bicycle and
pedestrian concepts for a communitywide network
• Present the draft active transportation network for public feedback
Task 2 Deliverables:
• Study network map
• Field assessment of critical connections in the study area
• Map(s) of draft network and associated databases
• Summary of the draft network
• Steering Committee meeting materials
• Walkshop summary
• Public Meeting 2 maps, graphics, and presentation
TASK 3: PRIORITIZATION AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
Crafton Tull will develop an implementation plan that identifies short-, medium-and long-term projects, as well
as a methodology for project prioritization, and general opinions of probable cost.
Task 3.1 Preliminary Estimates of Probable Cost (Planning-level)
Crafton Tull will develop a spreadsheet-based cost estimate to determine planning level costs for various
improvements (i.e. cost per foot of sidewalk). Total project estimates will not be provided, as bike & pedestrian
components are often only one part of an overall infrastructure project (i.e. a roadway design project that
include bike lanes but costs for road design options may vary). This task is intended to provide a comparison of
order of magnitude costs for specific routes or route segments.
www.craftontull.com 6
Task 3.2 Project Prioritization Methodology
Crafton Tull will create a list of prioritized projects based on need, cost, ease of implementation, completing
network gaps, and other community-specific goals, as prioritized by the steering committee. The Consultant will
work with Client to develop criteria that will be used to determine project priority. Factors that could be
considered for prioritizing projects may include:
• Project feasibility/ease of implementation
• Relative planning-level costs
• Safety
• Completing gaps within the active transportation network
• Potential to improve access in areas with high user volumes and other key activity locations
• Public support (improvements suggested by citizens in the public meetings, Client input, and Steering
Committee discussions)
• Opportunities to provide facilities as a part of previously planned or upcoming projects (repaving and
reconstruction projects)
• Other priorities as identified during the public input process
Task 3.3 Implementation Strategy
The pedestrian and bicycle recommendations from Task 2 will be scored and prioritized into short-,
intermediate-, and long-term projects based on the prioritization methodology established in Task 3.2. Projects
will be phased, and potential funding sources will be outlined. This approach provides guidance for sequenced
project rollout, while allowing flexibility to adapt as implementation opportunities arise.
Task 3.4 Policy Development and Code Reform Recommendations
The Crafton Tull Team will provide recommendations on municipal policies and code regarding sidewalk,
greenway, and other active transportation modes, including development triggered construction requirements.
Policy and program recommendations will also be provided that encourage the use of walking, biking, and
transit as viable modes of transportation. These may include, but are not limited to, complete streets as well as
bicycle and pedestrian accommodation policies for last-mile connectivity.
Task 3.5 Virtual Client and Steering Committee Review (see Additional Services for a third in-person workshop)
The Crafton Tull Team will conduct virtual meetings with staff and the Steering Committee to review project
prioritization, implementation strategies, as well as code and policy recommendations.
Task 3 Deliverables:
• Project cost estimating tool for unit prices
• Project prioritization
• Implementation strategies
• Steering Committee meeting materials
• Public Meeting 3 maps, graphics, and presentation
www.craftontull.com 7
TASK 4: MASTER PLAN DOCUMENTATION
The Crafton Tull Team will prepare draft and final versions of the CAMPO Active Transportation report. The final
report for the project will pull together the findings and public input generated in Tasks 1 through 3.
Task 4.1 Draft Report Development
The Draft Active Transportation Plan document will include written sections as well as maps that show the
locations of proposed projects. It will outline outcomes and recommendations from each of the tasks listed
above, and will include data on safety, accessibility, and efforts to increase use. The report will be illustrated
with graphic maps, photographs, charts and drawings as needed to support the text. It is anticipated that a local
map and project list for each community will be provided as part of the document.
Task 4.2 Client Review
The Draft Report will be made available for Client and Steering Committee review. If desired, a virtual meeting
will be held to review the plan document.
Task 4.3 Public Comment
The CAMPO Active Transportation Plan will be available for public comment. CAMPO staff will review comments
and indicate what sentiments should be reflected in the final plan.
Task 4.3 Final Report Development
Upon approval of the draft by the Client and Steering Committee, including comments from the public as
directed by CAMPO staff, the Crafton Tull Team will revise the draft document per such comments and prepare
a Final Report.
Task 4.4 Virtual Presentation to the CAMPO Board of Directors (Adoption Hearing)
Once the final plan has been completed, the Crafton Tull Team will prepare and deliver a virtual presentation for
City Council for plan adoption. The presentation will incorporate major themes, key highlights and summarize
plan recommendations.
Task 4.5 Local Jurisdiction Adoption
CAMPO staff will complete the Active Transportation Plan process by presenting the document to local
jurisdictions for adoption.
Task 4 Deliverab/es:
• Draft plan report with network maps (digital copies)
• Final plan report and executive summary (digital copies and 10 printed copies)
• Adoption presentation materials
www.craftontull.com 8
ADDITIONAL SERVICES
The following tasks can be provided as additional services for the fees indicated.
Task 3.5 Workshop 3: Building Success -IN PERSON (Additional $5,000}
The Crafton Tull Team will conduct the third and final workshop to review the active transportation plan
recommendations.
The Crafton Tull Team will be responsible for developing meeting materials, handouts and presentations. The
Client will be responsible for arranging the meeting venue and logistics, as well as distributing meeting
notifications.
• Steering Committee Meeting
The Steering Committee will meet to review project prioritization and implementation strategies.
• Public Meeting 3
This final public meeting will be used to garner feedback on the active transportation network and its
affiliated implementation strategies and phasing.
NOTE: No construction plans or details are included in this contract. Construction documents can be provided
as an Additional Service or as part of a separate contract. Boundary and topographic surveys may be
completed as an additional service if adequate information is unavailable.
Should there be additions to this scope of services, those services shall be compensated for additional fee.
www.craftontull.com 9
cf9 S ,~2f!~,~, ,!~.',!
Exhibit "B"
Standard Hourly Rate Schedule
Effective January 1, 2022
$
$
PROJECT MANAGER . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
SR. PROJECT ARCHITECT ............................ $
PROJECT ARCHITECT . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
INTERN ARCHITECT Ill . . . . .. . . . . .. .. . ... . .. . . . .. . ... .. $
INTERN ARCHITECT II . . . . . . ... . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . $
INTERN ARCHITECT I . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . .. . .. $
SR. DESIGNER ............................................. $
DESIGNER Ill ............................................... $
DESIGNER II .. . .... . .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. $
DESIGNER I ................................................. $
IM COORDINATOR Ill ............................... $
BIM COORDINATOR II .. .. .. .. .... . .. . .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. $
BIM COORDINATOR I .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... .. .. . .. . . . $
[CIVIL ENGINEERING __
ENGINEERING PRINCIPAL........................... $
SR. ENGINEERING MANAGER . . .. . .. .. ... ... .. .... .. $
ENGINEERING MANAGER .. .... ...... .... .. ........... $
SR. PROJECT ENGINEER . .. ....................... .
PROJECT ENGINEER ................................. .
ENGINEER INTERN Ill ................................. ..
ENGINEER INTERN II ............................... .
ENGINEER INTERN I ............................ .
SR. ENGINEERING DESIGNER ................... ..
ENGINEERING DESIGNER Ill ...................... .
ENGINEERING DESIGNER II ......................... .
ENGINEERING DESIGNER I ................ ..
ENGINEERING CAD TECHNICIAN Ill .............. .
ENGINEERING CAD TECHNICIAN II ............... .
ENGINEERING CAD TECHNICIAN I ............... ..
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
100
90
80
120
105
85
75
70
55
45
210
195
175
155
130
120
110
100
140
110
90
80
75
65
50
[ENVIRONMENTAL _
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER..................... $ 185
SR. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST .. ... ... ... ... . $ 145
PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST........ $ 120
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST II ..................... $ 100
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST I ...................... $ 80
[ADMINISTRATIVE
-~----~
ADMINISTRATIVE PRINCIPAL ........................ $ 185
ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGER ........................ $ 145
ADMINISTRATIVE IV...... .. ... ............ ... . $ 100
ADMINISTRATIVE Ill ...................................... $ 80
ADMINISTRATIVE II ..................................... $ 55
ADMINISTRATIVE I .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. $ 45
[PLANNING ! :
PLANNING MANAGER .. ...... . .. ... .. .. .. ...... .... $
SR. PLANNER .............................................. $
PROJECT PLANNER ..................................... $
PLANNER II ...... . . ........... ......... ...... ...... ...... $
PLANNER I ................................................... $
[INSPECTION
SR. INSPECTOR ........................................... $
INSPECTOR II .. . .. .. .. . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. . $
INSPECTOR I .. . .. .. .. .. . .. .. ... .. .. . .. .... .... . .... .... .. .. $
SURVEYOR PRINCIPAL ....... .
SR. PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR ... .. . .. . .. . .. ... . $
PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR ......................... $
SURVEY PROJECT MANAGER ....................... $
SURVEY COORDINATOR ............................ $
SURVEYOR INTERN .. .... .... . .... ...... . .. .. .. .. .... . $
SURVEY PARTY CHIEF II ........................... $
SURVEY PARTY CHIEF I . . .. . ...... .... .. ...... ... .. . . $
SURVEY TECHNICIAN Ill .. . ... ...... ....... ..... ...... . $
SURVEY TECHNICIAN II .. ... .. . .. .. .... .. $
SURVEY TECHNICIAN I .. .. ........... $
[GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS
GIS MANAGER .. . .. . .. . ... .. . .. . .. . .. $
GIS ANALYST .. . . . . . . . .. .. . .. . .. . .. .. . . .. . . .. .. . .. . .. . .. . .. $
GIS TECHNICIAN II
GIS TECHNICIAN I ....................................... .
[8-EIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
$
$
170
155
120
100
85
110
95
65
150
120
115
95
85
85
75
65
55
45
110
90
65
50
GPS Equipment... ....................................... $35/Hour
Robotic Survey Equipment ........................... $20/Hour
LiDAR Scanning Equipment ........................ $35/Hour
UAV .................................................... $1000/Unit
Job Related Mileage .................................... $0 .58/Mile
Per Diem for Out of Town Crews ..... Per GSA Allowable
Airfare and other travel related expenses .......... At Cost
Black and white 8 .5"x11" Copies .............. $0.15/sheet
Color 8.5"x11" Copies ............................ $1.50/sheet
Photo Paper Color Plan Sheet Copies ...... $0.75/sq. ft.
Reproducible Plan Copies (Vellum) ........... $1.50/sq. ft
Reproducible Plan Copies (Bond) ............. $0.35/sq. ft.
All rates are subject to change without notice.
Task 1
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
Task2
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2 .5
Task 3
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
Task4
4.1
4.2
4 .3
4.4
4 .5
4 .6
EXHIBIT C PROJECT SCHEDULE
CAMPO Active Transportation Plan
1 -2
I Kickoff, Existing Facilities,ViSioning, Coordination
I Virtual Kickoff Meeting ~
I Ongoing Coordination
I Public Engagemen+ Plan
I Previous Plans Review & Assessment
I Data r. -" >n & Base Mapping
I Existing Facilities & Existing Conditions Analysis
3
!Sidewalk l'lventory (by CAMPO) • Workshop 1 :Site Tour, Steering Committee Meeting, (6)
St akeholder Group Meetinqs, Public tvieeu1 r_q
! Preliminary Networ k, A· u•t::ul, q~;:..,v••m•~::ndations
1 Develop Study Network
!Assess Study Network
,Preliminary 1\it:Lwutl\ D~.-~ '"'"'rrtt:lll
, Clien t Revie
Workshop 2 : S t eering Committe e, Walk Audits, Public Meeting 2
I Priur Ju Laln.m & Implementation Plan
I Preliminary Estimates of Probable Cost
Project Prioritization
Implementation Strategy
Policy Development & Code Refotttt Recommendations
Virtual Client & Steering Committee '1t:vrt::w
Master Pl an Documentation
Draft Report Development
. Client Review
Public Cu,, rt::tlt
Final Report Development
Virtual Adoption Hearings (CAMPO, City of Jefferson, City of
Holt's Summit
Other Local Jurbd1dion JJ rlr,ption (by CAMPO)
C-1
Months from Notice to Proceed
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
l T •
.
:·
r-:·~:T
k~?~.
~_;~~:~
Capital Area
Active
Transportation
Plan
2022-23 Update of ...
Ca pital Area Metl"'polit an Plan ning Organization
Capital Area Pede·strian &
Bicycle Plan 2016
Holts Summi t -Jefferson City -lAke Mylc ee -St. Martins -Taos -Wardsvilie -portions of Co l e & Callaway Counties
Ad opted by CAM PO 10/19/2016
Ad opted b y City ofJefferson 05/1 5/2017
Ad opted b y City of St_ M .!rti ns 02/14/2017
c ro -0..
$
(]) z
Project Goals
• Integrate recent local, regional, statewide planning
• Incorporate best practice recommendations
• CPTED, Vision Zero, Complete Streets
• Inventory features, gaps, and barriers
• Create a tool that supports active transportation education and programming
• Identify and prioritize infrastructure projects
• Identify municipal policy and code recommendations
• Establish policies/program recommendations to encourage use.
• Increase our Bicycle Friendly Community designation
• Identify funding mechanisms
• Set a capital improvement schedule for implementation.
• Utilize a robust public engagement campaign.
Data -Visioning -Coordination -Public Engagement
Network Assessment -Recommendations -Public Engagement
Winter/Spring 2023
Prioritization & Implementation Plan -Policy/Code Recommendations
Draft Report -Public Review/Comment-Public Enagement
2016 Capital Area Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan
2016 Goals
• Improve user safety of all modes of transportation.
• Increase the number of people walking, bicycling and using transit.
• Stimulate economic development within the community.
• Educate the community on the benefits of well-connected transportation
system that includes vehicles, walking, biking, and transit.
• Improve the health and well-being of all members of the community.
• Foster a continued, collaborative, and cooperative relationship with the
public in the development of a well-connected transportation system.
• Encourage community and regional involvement.
Capital Area
Active Transportation Plan
Public Engagement
• Stakeholder Interviews
• Steering Committee Meetings -July 28 Meet and Greet
• Public Survey
• Public Meetings
• Outreach at events
• Speaking engagements
• Webpage/Social Media
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES
MEMORANDUM
Public Works & Planning Committee
Sonny Sanders, Planning & Protective Services Director
Rachel Senzee, Neighborhood Services Supervisor
July 14, 2022
CDBG-DR Proposal
The State of Missouri's Department of Economic Development (OED) is administering
the Community Development Block Grant-Disaster Recovery funds related to FEMA
Disaster 4451. Statewide analysis of damages sustained from flooding and tornadoes
identified Cole, Holt, and St. Charles counties as having the greatest impact. DED's
Action Plan identifies housing recovery as the most urgent need .
The amount of funding obligated to housing recovery within Cole County is $7,059,300.
As the lead applicant, the City of Jefferson is required to formally submit a proposal for
an t icipated use of funds .
Committee Request: Approve resolution moves to Council.
For questions or comments, please contact Rachel Senzee at
rsenzee@jeffersoncitymo .gov or 573-634-6305 .
Enclosures
RESOLUTION SUMMARY
RESOLUTION N0:-=2=02=2~-__
SPONSOR: Councilman Fitzwater
SUBJECT: Approving Proposal for CDBG-DR Funds
INTRODUCED: July 18. 2022
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR(S): ______________ _
CITY ADMINISTRATOR: ______________ _
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve
ORIGIN OF REQUEST: PPS
DEPARTMENT RESPONSIBLE: PPS
PERSON RESPONSIBLE: RacheiSenzee
Background Information: The State of Missouri's Department of Economic Development
(OED) is administering the Community Development Block Grant-Disaster Recovery funds
related to FEMA disaster 4451. Statewide analysis of damages sustained from flooding and
tornadoes identified Cole, Holt, and St. Charles counties as having the greatest impact. DED's
Action Plan identities housing recovery as the most urgent need.
The amount of funding obligated to housing recovery within Cole County is $7,059,300. As the
lead applicant, the City of Jefferson is required to formally submit a proposal for anticipated use
of the funds.
Fiscal Information: CDBG-DR funds are 100% federally funded.
Resolution Terms: The Resolution would authorize the City to formally apply for Community
Development Block Grant-Disaster Recovery funds.
RESOLUTION
RS2022-
Sponsored by: Councilman Fitzwater
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI
TO APPLY FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT-DISASTER RECOVERY
FUNDING
WHEREAS, the City of Jefferson has been designated the lead applicant to apply for
Community Development Block Grant-Disaster Recovery funding through the
State of Missouri Department of Economic Development; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of the grant is to secure funding for housing programs that assist
recovery efforts from the 2019 tornado; and
WHEREAS, the grant will provide $7,059,300 to the City for the purpose stated above; and
WHEREAS, receiving said grant would benefit housing recovery efforts in Cole County.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Jefferson, Missouri,
supports and authorizes the City Administrator, Steve Crowell, to execute and submit the
necessary application to obtain funding for Community Development Block Grant -
Disaster Recovery funds.
Passed: ___________ _ Approved: __________ _
Presiding Officer Mayor Carrie Tergin
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Clerk City Counselor
State o f Missouri CDBG-DR 4451
Lead Applicant Proposal Form
Missouri Dep a rtment of
Economic Development
A. NAME <CITY oR couNTY): City of Jefferson
c . MAILING ADDREss : 320 E. McCarty Street
E. CITY . sTATE . ziP coDE Jefferson City, Missouri, 65101
F. cHIEF OFFICIAL oF (A): Carrie Tergin
H. TELEPHONE OF (F) 573-634-6303
DR-4451 PROPOSAL
Community Development
Block Grant Program
B. DUN S#:VDNHEABWLHK6
D. EM A IL ADDREss ctergin@jeffersoncitymo.gov
G. TITLE oF <F>: Mayor
I. FA X OF (F): 573-634-6522
J . FISCAL YEAR END OF (A) (M/D): 1 0/31 K. FEDERAL EMPLOYEE IDENTIFICATION #: 446000193
A. NAME : Karlie Reinkemeyer B: EM A IL ADDREss kreinkemeyer@jeffersoncitymo .gov
c . MAILING ADDREss: 320 E. McCarty Street
D. ciTY. sTATE . ZIP coDE : Jefferson City, MO 65101
E. NAM E OF AG ENCY City Of Jefferson
F. TELEPHONE : 573-634-6564 G. FAX :
H. IS THE APPLI CA TION PREPARE R AGENCY A REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISS ION/CO UN CIL OF GOVERNMENT THAT W ILL BE PRO V IDING GRANT
ADM INISTR ATION SERVICES?
~NO
0YES; INCLUDE PRE-SELECTION PROFESSION AL SERVICES FORM AN D REQUIRED DOC UMEN TATION
3. Other Information for Reporting Purposes
A. 2020 POPULATION OF 1A: 43228
B. STATE REPRESENTATIVE(S) & DISTRICT(S): Dave Griffith 60 c . EMAIL dave.griffith@house.mo.gov
D. sTATE sENATOR<s> & DI STRICT<S>: Mike Bernskoetter 06 E. EM A IL mike .bernskoetter@senate.mo.gov
State Representative Rudy Veit-59 Email : rudy .veit@house .mo.gov
4 . Program Activities
Identify the activities that will be implemented as part of the applicant's disaster recovery
~Housing
i!iiil Acquisition for Demolition Only ~ Construction of New Affordable Housing ~ Affordable Multi-family Rental Housing
(for Hom eownership) (New Construction or Repair/Rehabilitation)
i!iiil Down Payment Assistance i!iiil Hom eowner Rehabilitation 0 Lo ca l Voluntary Buyout
i!iiil Infrastructure to Support Housing i!iiil Housing Incentive for Replacement
Recovery Efforts and Affordable Housing Assistance
i!i!i Public Service (Housing Counseling)
~Planning
Program Overview • Page 1-1
State of Missouri CDBG-DR 4451
Lead Applicant Proposal Form
2. Residential Antidisplacement and Relocation Assistance Plan
REQUIRED BY ALL APPLICANTS FOR FUNDING UNDER SECTION 104(d) OF THE HOUSINGAND COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1974, AS AMENDED
The Applicant will replace all occupied and vacant occupiable low/moderate-income dwelling units demolished or
converted to use other than low/moderate income housing as a direct result of activities assisted with funds
provided under the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended.
All replacement housing will be provided within three years of the demolition of conversion. Before obligating or expending funds
that will directly result in such demolition or conversion, the Applicant will make public and submit, to the CDBG program, the
following information in writing:
1. A description of the proposed assisted activity;
2. The general location on a map and approximate number of dwelling units by size( number of bedrooms} that will be
demolished or converted to a use other than low/moderate-income dwelling units as a direct result of the assisted
activity;
3. A time schedule for the commencement and completion of the demolition or conversion;
4. The general location on a map and approximate number of dwelling units by size (number of bedrooms} that will be
provided as Section 104(d} replacement dwellingunits;
5. The source of funding and a time schedule for the provisions of Section 1 04(d}replacement dwelling units; and
6. The basis for concluding that each Section 104(d} replacement dwelling unit will remainalow/moderate income
dwelling unit for at least 10 years from the date of initial occupancy.
The Applicant will provide relocation assistance, as described in Section 570.488 and the State's CDBG-DR Relocation
Assistance policy, to each low/moderate-income household displaced by the demolition of housing or by the conversion of a
low/moderate-income dwelling to another use as a direct result of assisted activities.
Consistent with the goals and objectives of activities assisted under the Act, the Applicant will take steps to minimize the
displacement of persons from their homes.
D NO RESIDENTS WILL BE DISPLACED BY PROJECT ACTIVITIES
iii RESIDENTS MAY BE DISPLACED BY PROJECT ACTIVITIES*
* A Residential Anti-Displacement and Relocation Assistance Plan, developed in accordance with CDBG-DR relocation policy
and the State RARAP must be provided with project documentation before funds may be obligated or expended for the project.
Residential Antidisplacement and Relocation Assistance Plan • Page 2-1
State of Missouri CDBG-DR 4451
Lead Applicant Proposal Form
3. Program Budget
Complete the attached DR-4451 Program Budget file and include with this application .
See attached Program Budget file .
Program Budget • Page 3-2
State of Missouri CDBG-DR 4451
Lead Applicant Proposal Form
4. Background
The DR-4451 Action Plan provides thorough demographic information for each lead applicant. The applicant is encouraged to
provide any additional information, beyond what is included in the DR-4451 Action Plan, to substantiate the unmet needs for
activities within this proposal. 500 word max per section.
A. Applicant Demographics
The tornado's destructive path went through census tracts 105 and 207, which are Qualified Census
Tracts within Cole County. The tornado took its toll on the city's most vulnerable populations. As the
budget highlights; the City intends to open up all relevant spending categories to help alleviate tbe
impacts of the tornado. Approximately $4.7 million is dedicated to Multi-Family Rental Housing. Many
low-income rental properties were completely destroyed by the disaster which left many families
displaced. The tornado exacerbated the low-moderate income housing shortage. It has been three
years since the tornado, and the shortage has not been alleviated. The City intends to help the
vulnerable populations by seeking multi-family rental housing development to bring new housing
opportunities to the community.
The Citv of .Jp.ffeffion nrono~e~ to dedicate Si1 million for infra~tructure to ~unnnrt hnu~ino II
B. Natural Environment
The natural environment was altered by the tornado with many trees and vegetation being uprooted
a:nd destroyed, Debris was left scattered throughout the city streets and yards. The tornado destroyed
numerous residences and affected a large portion of the City's most vulnerable populations.
Homeowners and renters were left with severe damage to their homes or in some cases completely
destroyed homes with nowhere to go. The City intends to develop affordable housing opportunities
within these neighborhood~. The tornado's path went through multiple LMI cen~us tracts.
These activities· will meet HUD's National Objectives: Low and Moderate Income Persons or
Households, Low Mod Area Benefit, Low Mod Housing Activities, Slum and Blight Removal, and
Urgent Need.
C. Storm Impacts
Just before midnjght on May 22, 2019, an EF-3 tornado made its way through Cole county and
ultimately left a three-mile path of destruction through Jefferson City. The tornado traveled a total of
thirty-two miles and had wind speeds of 1.60 miles per hour.
Due to the storm's impact, City officials estimated that there were 100 housing units within structures
that were planned for demolition. Most of these 1 00 units were within apartment buildings. The
Hawthorne Apartment complex had the largest impact. The complex lost eight 8-unit buildings that
were demolished.
According to the City's Building Official (May 23, 2021 ):
• 73 residential buildings have been demolished
• 16 non-resid~ntial buildings have been torn down (including apartment buildings)
• 11 residential structures are yet to be demolished
• 1 commercial structure is yet to be demolished
Background • Page 4-3
II
D. Economic Impacts
State of Missouri CDBG-DR 4451
Lead Applicant Proposal Form
The Missouri Department of Economic Development data shows Jefferson City residents made more
than $170 million in insurance claims after the 2019 tornado. The data shows most of the claims were
for residential work, which accounted for more than $43 million in payments. Claims for commercial
work received payments of $44 million.
It is difficult to assess the true economic impacts of the tornado due to the CO VI D-19 pandemic that
happened shortly after the tornado.
E. Public Services and Infrastructure Impacts
I d. t h. h bl" n 1caew 1c pu 1c services, 1 any, were 1mpacte db th d" )y e 1sas er even .
ii!l Schools !!!iii First Responders !!!iii Hospitals
ii!l Public Buildings !!!iii Roads 0 Water/Sewer/Drainage
0 Other (describe):
Describe any unique/unforeseen failures in public services and/or infrastructure.
None .
Background • Page 4-4
State of Missouri CDBG-DR 4451
Le ad Appl icant Proposal Form
5 . Community Impact
In a separate document , not to exceed 3 pages, please provide any additional qualitative and quantitative support to describe
the impact of the disaster on communities within the county . If specific areas within the county were more severely impacted ,
please provide boundaries of area and any unique characteristics (i.e. demographics, natural or built environment, etc.).
This content should be developed based on local knowledge, as well as municipal consultations and citizen participation
required under Section 7 of this proposal. Pictures, maps, and graphics are encouraged .
See attached document.
Community Impact • Page 5-5
State of Mis souri CDBG-DR 4451
Lead Applicant Propo sal Form
6 . Program Development
The following information should be provided for each program activity , as indicated in Sect ion 1. Program Overview, 4 . Program
Activities section above , depending on whether specific projects have been identified pre-award or w ill be solicited post-
award of the lead applicant's grant. See attached document.
Projects Identified Pre-Award Projects Identified Post-Award
lnfonmation for each project must include , at minimum :
• Project name
• Project location
• Subapplicant (if applicable)
• Unmet need addressed by project
• Anticipated National Objective(s)
• Estimated costs
• Anticipated PER/PAR completion date (if project
includes construct ion)
• Projected milestones and expenditures based on
quarters of project (i.e . Year 1 Quarter 1, Year 1 Quarter
2 , etc.)
• Intention to use State policy or develop more-
restrictive local olic
lnfonmation for each activity must include , at minimum:
• Subapplicant (if applicable)
• Unmet need addressed by project
• Anticipated National Objective(s)
• Project/beneficiary solicitation methodology
• Intention to use State policy or develop more-restrictive
local policy
NOTE: Prior to obligation or ex penditure of funds for any project , CDBG must receive and approve the following documentation:
• Documentation required under the relevant CDBG -DR activity policy
• Preliminary Engineering/Architectural Report (if applicable)
• Authorization to Use Grant Funds
• Cost Summary Sheet
• National Objective documentation
• Subapplicant agreement, certifications , and policies (if applicable)
• Procurement compliance documentation
• Civil Rights Compliance form
• Residential Antidisplacement and Relocation Assistance Plan (if applicable)
• Site-specific FEMA floodplain map
• Letters of commit ment from all other funding sources
Program D e velopm ent • Page 6-6
State of Missouri CDBG-DR 4451
Lead Applicant Proposal Form
7. Citizen and Municipal Participation
A. Municipal Consultations
The State of Missouri CDBG program requires that municipalities within the lead applicant's jurisdiction be consulted to identify
projects under the applicant's program. Documentation of consultations must include the following:
1. Sign-in sheet, agenda , and minutes from a joint meeting with officials of each municipality and lead applicant to discuss:
a. Community-specific impacts for Section 5 of this proposal
b. Overview of all eligible activities under the State of Missouri 's DR-4451 program
c. Potential projects within each municipality
NOTE : CDBG staff must be invited to attend this joint meeting to answer general questions about the State CDBG-DR
program .
2. 1 0-day comment period for municipalities of the lead applicant's draft proposal, including:
a. Summary of comments received
b. Lead applicant's response to each comment
NOTE: This comment period may run concurrently to the public comment period required under the CDBG Citizen
Participation section below.
B. Citizen Participation
All applicants for and recipients of CDBG funds shall be required to conduct all aspects of the CDBG program in an open
manner with access to records on the proposed and actual use of funds for all interested persons. All records of applications
must be kept at the applicant's office and be available during normal working hours . Any activity of the CDBG program, with the
exception of confidential matters relating to the housing rehabilitation, shall be open to examination by all citizens.
The applicant must provide technical assistance at the level of expertise available to groups representative of persons of low and
moderate income that request such assistance in developing proposals . All proposal materials and instructions shall be provided
at no cost to any such group requesting same. Citizens shall be provided adequate and timely information , so as to enable them
to be meaningfully involved in important decisions at the various stages of the program including:
1. Development of needs
2. Review of proposed activities
3. Review of past program performance
The elected body of the applicant must pass a resolution authorizing submission of an application to the CDBG program. The
resolution may designate an individual other than the Chief Elected Official (CEO), typically a City Manager/Administrator or
other staff member, to execute all application documents on behalf of the applicant. This individual must be expressly named in
the resolution .
Adequate citizen participation shall meet the requirements of the State of Missouri Citizen Participation Plan , under
"Requirements for Local Governments Receiving State CDBG Funds". Notification of any and all hearings shall be given a
minimum of five full days in advance to allow citizens the opportunity to schedule attendance. Notification shall be in the form of
display-type advertisements in a newspaper of the widest circulation within the lead applicant's jurisdiction.
NOTE : For the purpose of this process , "full days" is defined as neither day being counted on either end of the time period (i .e .,
five full days before public hearing would actually be seven days since beginning and ending days cannot be counted). The
public hearing notice must include the following content:
1. The applicant intends to submit an application for CDBG funds .
2. The maximum grant amount.
3. The type of activities that may be undertaken , as identified in the CDBG DR-4451 Action Plan .
4 . National Objective(s) must be stated .
5. There will be minimization of displacement of persons resulting from the project, and assistance to any displaced
persons would be provided according to the Uniform Relocation and Real Property Acquisition Act of 1970 as amended,
Section 1 04(d), Section 1 04(k) or Section 1 05(a)(11) of the Title I Act.
Citizen and Municipal Participation • Page 7-7
State of Missouri CDBG-DR 4451
Lead Applicant Proposal Form
6. The applicant is soliciting citizen input on the entity's on-going community development needs.
7. Description of proposed activities for which the city and/or county is applying, as identified in Section 1.4 of this proposal
8. Total estimated cost, including amount being applied for, other state and/or federal funds, local contribution proposed,
etc., for each program activity.
9. Specific location of projects identified pre-award, either community-wide or boundaries (by name) of target area.
10. Percent of LMI benefit of the proposed project (if known), or at least 70%.
11. Encouragement of area residents to attend.
Documentation to be submitted must include, at minimum:
1. Affidavit of publication for public hearing notice
2. Sign-in sheet, agenda, and minutes from public hearing
3. A copy of the resolution to apply (including designated authority by CEO, if applicable)
• Page 7-8
A. E-Verify
State of Missouri CDBG-DR 4451
Lead Applicant Proposal Form
8. Certifications
This form certifies that the applicant (city/county) and subapplicant (if relevant to the application/project) do not employ illegal
aliens (undocumented workers)* and that the informationcontained in the application is true, correct and complete.
In addition to certifying that your organization does not employ illegal aliens, all applicants must: 1) enroll in E-Verify, 2) check
the box on the Certification confirming enrollment and participation in E-Verify, and 3) provide supporting documentation.
The E-Verify Program, conducted jointly by the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) Verification Division and the
Social Security Administration (SSA), is designed to provide employment status information to determine the eligibility of
applicants for employment.
E-Verify requires that participating commercial employers use the automated Verification Information System (VIS) to check the
SSA and the USCIS databases to verify the employment authorization of ALL newly hired employees.
An employer's participation in E-Verify is voluntary and is currently free. To access theE-Verify website, go to: https:/lwww.vis-
dhs.com/employer_information.htm
The Certification form must be signed by the chief official of the applicant and notarized. All applicants
must complete this form awl attach a full copy of the E-Verification memorandum to be eligible for
the CDBG program.
B. Anti-Lobbying Certification
The applicant certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:
1. No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the
undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or
employeeof any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or
an employeeof a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal
contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering
into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment,
or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
2. If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any
person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a
Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of
Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement,
theundersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report
Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions.
3. The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the
awarddocuments for all subawards (at all tiers, including contracts under grants, loans, and
cooperative agreements, subcontracts, and subgrants) over $100,000, and that all
subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.
This certification herein is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or
entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by Section
1352, Title 31, U.S.C. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than
$10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.
Certifications • Page 8-9
E-VERIFY CERTIFICATION
State of Missouri CDBG-DR 4451
Lead Applicant Proposal Form
iii I certify that I am an authorized representative of the applicanUsubapplicant and as such am authorized to make
the statement of affirmation contained herein.
iii I certify that the applicanUsubapplicant does NOT knowingly employ any person who is an unauthorized alien and
that the applicanUsubapplicant has complied with federal law (8 U.S. C.§ 1324a) requiring the examination of an
appropriate document or documents to verify that each individual is not an unauthorized alien.
iii I certify that the applicanUsubapplicant is enrolled and will participate in a federal work authorization program
as defined in Section 285.525(6), RSMo, with respect to employees working in connection with the activities
that qualify applicanUsubapplicant for this program. I certify that the applicanUsubapplicant will maintain and,
upon request, provide the Department of Economic Development documentation demonstrating applicant's
participation in a federal work authorization program with respect to employees working in connection with the
activities that qualify applicanUsubapplicant for this program.
iii I understand that, pursuant to section 285.530.5, RSMo, a general contractor or subcontractor of any tier shall
not be liable under sections 285.525 to 285.550 when such general contractor or subcontractor contracts with its
direct subcontractor who violates section 285.530.1, if the contract binding the contractor and subcontractor
affirmatively states that the direct subcontractor is not knowingly in violation of section 285.530.1 and shall not
henceforth be in such violation and the contractor or subcontractor receives a sworn affidavit under the penalty of
pe~uryattesting to the fact that the direct subcontractor's employees are lawfully present in the United States.
Iii I understand that if the applicanUsubapplicant is found to have employed an unauthorized alien, applicant
may subject to penalties pursuant to Sections 135.815, 285.025, and 285.535,RSMo.
Iii I hereby agree to allow representatives of the Department of Economic Development access to the property
and applicable records as may be necessary for the administration of this program.
iii I certify under penalties of perjury that the above statements and information contained in the application and
attachments are complete true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Required Attachment:
Copy of the executed Memorandum of Understanding between the applicanUsubapplicant and the United States
Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS).
Name
Carrie T erg in
Signature
STATE OF MISSOURI
COUNTY/CITYOF ________ ,)
)
) ss.
Title
Mayor
Date
On this __ day of _____ , 20 __ , before me, _______________ , a Notary Public in
and for said state, personally appeared _____________ ,, known to me to be the person who
executed the Certification and acknowledged and states on his/her oath to me that he/she executed the same for the
purposes therein stated.
Notary Public:
My commission expires:
Certlficattons • Page 8-1 0
C. Required Attachments
I understand and certify:
State of Missouri CDBG-DR 4451
Lead Applicant Proposal Form
• The information represented in this proposal is true to the best of my knowledge;
• I have read and understand the compliance requirements of the CDBG and CDBG-DR Programs;
• That the CDBG funds are limited in scope and that the application represents thepriority projects of the
community;
• That, if awarded, the funds will be used solely for the purpose declared in this application ;
• That OED reserves the right to reduce or change the award for any project;
• My initials below indicates confirmation that all applicable attachments are included and accurately
completed as part of this application and that, if any required attachments are missing, this
application will be returned and not considered by the CDBG program for funding.
The applicant further assures and certifies that the applicant agrees to abide by all applicable State and Federal rules and
regulations, including the anti-lobbying certification included herein. The applicant also certifies that the project activities are
designed to meet community development needs.
The Code of Federal Regulations applicable to the Department of Housing and Urban Development's Community
Development Block Grant funds require that the following documents are attached with this application:
Required Attachments
Chief Elected Official Document Name
Initials
Most recent financial statements
Most recent Single Audit or statement that no Single Audit has been required in the last three
years
Citizen and Municipal Participation Attachments (detailed in Section 7)
Reso lution of Intent to Apply
Fair Housing Ordinance/Resolution
Excessive Force Prohibition Resolution
Conflict of interest policy (if none exists currently, state so in writin~)
Procurement policy (if none exists currently, state so in writing)
E-Verify MOU
Section 3 Utilization Form
Letters of commitment from other fund in~ source
Carrie Tergin Mayor
Name (typed or printed) Title
Signature, Mayor or Presiding Commissioner Date
Certifications • Page 8-11
SECTION 5: COMMUNITY IMPACT
On May 22, 2019, a tornado strengthened from an EF-2 to an EF-3 as it moved into a subdivision off of
Heritage Highway just west of US Highway 54 and just outside the city limits of Jefferson City. The
tornado caused a complete collapse of a residential home and the complete destruction of sixteen
mobile homes at Twin Bridges Mobile Home Village . The mobile home community was never rebuilt. As
the tornado moved northeast into Jefferson City it destroyed and greatly damaged Braun Storage Unit
Complex and car dealership. The tornado left a three-mile path of destruction from Christy Drive toward
the Missouri River. The tornado remained on the ground for several minutes before moving out of the
city. Every business from the intersection of Ellis Boulevard and Christy Drive and going south on Christy
Drive suffered significant damage such as roofs torn off, parts of walls collapsing, windows blown out,
and trees and power poles were snapped off. The businesses affected included Burger King, Best
Western Inn, Capital Bowl, and Riley Chevrolet (where at least 750 vehicles were totaled). The Special
Olympics Missouri Training for Life facility was also hit with part of its roof blown off.
Some of the most extensive damage was on Ellis
Boulevard. A Break Time and Sonic Drive-In suffered
severe structural damage. The Firley YMCA lost a wall
from the tornado impact. Hawthorne Apartments on
Ellis Boulevard also took a hit. The apartment
complex had parts of roofs torn off buildings,
windows broken out, and other significant damage.
Sixty-four units were lost resulting in eight eight-unit
buildings being demolished. The tornado uprooted
and tossed trees, snapped telephone poles, and
displaced numerous families.
The EF-3 tornado hit some of the most densely built
neighborhoods. Including homes along Woodlawn
Avenue, Hickory Street, East Dunklin Street, Jackson
Street, Mesa Avenue, and Holiday Drive. Trees were
blown into homes and in some cases, whole roofs
were lifted off. Almost every property between
Adams and Cherry Street was damaged . Jackson
Street which is between Stadium Blvd and Dunklin St
is where the tornado laid a destructive path that
damaged many properties. Before the tornado
dissipated at the Missouri River, the tornado
severely damaged the historic gem of Capitol
Avenue. Two walls on the Missouri State Penitentiary site also collapsed due to the storm.
The tornado shed new light on the housing environment in Jefferson City. Many rental and affordable
homes were affected by the disaster, further exacerbating housing issues in Jefferson City. It is
estimated that the most impacted area lost around 152 housing units, roughly 95% being rental units.
Some families were forced to relocate to other communities because they could not find affordable
housing. A continued lack of affordable housing in Jefferson City contributes to economic and social
issues, including poverty and homelessness.
SECTION 5: COMMUNITY IMPACT
The tornado impacted school buildings including the Simonsen gth Grade Center. Jefferson City Public
Schools sustained damage including; Nichols Career Center which had windows broken and gas lines
were broken off when the large rooftop units had been blown over, Adkins Stadium's press box's roof
was blown off, and Thorpe Gordon Elementary School had minor roof damage, and the Jefferson City
Academic Center had minor penetration of its roof by debris.
In Cole County, 516 residential buildings sustained damage, and 382 were within the City of Jefferson.
Within the City, 51 structures were expected to be destroyed including commercial buildings.
SECTION 5: COMMUNITY IMPACT
SECTION 6: PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT
Acquisition [or Demolition Only-$200,000
1. Unmet Needs Addressed by the Project
There are at least eight structures that need to be demolished due to the destruction of the tornado
in the City of Jefferson. The deteriorating conditions are blighting the neighborhoods and are
unsafe. Demolition activities will result in the removal of slums and blight.
2. Anticipated National Objective(s)
Slum and Blight Elimination-Area Basis (SBA), Spot Basis (SBS), and Urban Renewal (SBR).
3. Project/Beneficiary Solicitation Methodology
The City of Jefferson will demolish abandoned and dilapidated residential properties with the goal of
reducing slum and blight conditions as a result of disaster related damage . Property owners may
apply to the City for utilitzation of the Acquisition/Demoliton program on a first come-first serve
basis.
4. Intention to use state policy or develop more res t rictive local policy
State policy
1
SECTION 6: PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT
Construction o(New Affordable Housing (for Homeownership}-$521,928
1. Unmet Needs Addressed by the Project
The City of Jefferson has been experiencing a housing shortage for years and the 2019 tornado
further exacerbated the issue. This program will provide up to 25% of total const r uction costs, plus
closing costs for the construction of new affordable housing for homeownership to help replenish
the affordable housing stock in Jefferson City and Cole County.
2. Anticipated National Objective(s)
Low/Mod Housing Benefit (LMH), Low/Mod Housing Benefit, CDFI, or NRSA (LMHSP), and Urgent
Need (URG).
3. Project/Beneficiary Solicitation Methodology
The City of Jefferson will issue a Request for Proposals for developers to competitively submit bids
for the construction of affordable single-family homes. A review committee will select and award.
The RFP will be posted electronically and posted in the News Tribune. Sealed Bids and proposals are
advertised in the News Tribune and posted electronically
at https://jeffersoncitymo.bonfirehub.com for a minimum of fourteen days prior to the bid opening
or proposal receipt date. Vendors must reg ister to receive the specifications, terms and conditions,
and response forms.
One hundred percent of the beneficiaries will be Low to Moderate Income persons . The City of
Jefferson will utilize HUD's most current Income Guidelines to determine eligibility for this program.
2022 HUD Income Guidelines (Effective April18, 2022)
Persons in 1 2 Household 3 4 5
Income Limits $46,350 $52,950 $59,550 $66,150 $71,450
The City of Jefferson will advertise the Affordable Single-Family New Construction housing
opportunity on the City's website. The City of Jefferson will share this opportunity with local non-
profits so they can share it throughout their organizations .
4. Intention to use state policy or develop more res trictive local policy
The City of Jefferson intends to develop a local policy unless the State adopts a usable policy.
2
SECTION 6: PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT
Affordable Multi-Family Rental Housing (New Construction or Repair/Rehabilitation}-$4,700,000
1. Unmet Needs Addressed by the Project
The City of Jefferson has been experiencing a housing shortage for years and the 2019 tornado
further exacerbated the issue . Hawthorne Apartments was impacted heavily by the tornado
resulting in a loss of 64 apartment units. This program will provide funding for the construction or
rehabilitation of new affordable multi-family housing opportunities to help replenish the affordable
multi-family housing opportunities in Jefferson City and Cole County.
Up to $4,700,000 is available for new construction of multi-family rental housing and up to
$1,000,000 is available for rehabilitation of existing multifamily rental complexes.
2. Anticipated National Objective(s)
Low/Mod Housing Benefit (LMH), Low/Mod Income (LMI), Low/Mod Housing Benefit, CDFI, or NRSA
(LMHSP).
3. Project/Beneficiary Solicitation Methodology
The City of Jefferson will issue a Request for Proposals for developers to compet itively submit bids
for the construction or rehabilitation of affordable multi-family homes. A review committee will
select and award . The RFP will be posted electronically and posted in the News Tribune. Sealed Bids
and proposals are advertised in the News Tribune and posted electronically
at https://jeffersoncitymo.bonfirehub .com for a minimum of fourteen days prior to the bid opening
or proposal receipt date. Vendors must register to receive the specifications, terms and conditions,
and response forms.
One hundred percent of the beneficiaries will be Low to Moderate Income persons. The City of
Jefferson will utilize HUD's most current Income Guidelines to determine eligibility for this program.
2022 HUD Income Guidelines (Effective April18, 2022)
Persons in 1 2 3 4 5 Household
Income Limits $46,350 $52,950 $59,550 $66,150 $71,450
4. Intention to use state policy or develop more restrictive local policy
The City of Jefferson intends to develop a local policy unless the State adopts a usable policy.
3
'
SECTION 6: PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT
Down-Payment Assistance-$50,000
1. Unmet Needs Addressed by the Project
The 2019 tornado damaged multiple homes throughout the City and within Cole County. The
purpose of the program is to assist low-to-moderate-income first-time home buyers with a down
payment. In an effort to place more individuals in homes, the down-payment assistance program
will aid individuals with purchasing a home within the tornado's impact route. The program will
improve the opportunities for homeownership for Low and Moderate-Income families who were
impacted by the tornado.
Up to 100% of the down payment may be covered .
2. Anticipated National Objective(s)
Low/Mod Housing Benefit (LMH), Low/Mod Housing Benefit, CDFI , or NRSA (LMHSP), and Urgent
Need (URG).
3. Project/Beneficiary Solicitation Methodology
The City of Jefferson will advertise the Disaster Recovery Down-Payment Assistance Program on the
City's website. The Disaster Recovery Down Payment Assistance Program will be shared with local
non-profits, JC Area Board of Realtors, and financial institutions that utilize the City's existing down
payment assistance program .
One hundred percent of the beneficiaries will be Low to Moderate Income persons . The City of
Jefferson will utilize HUD's most current Income Guidelines to determine eligibility for this program .
2022 HUD Income Guidelines (Effective April18, 2022)
Persons in 1 3 Household 2
Income Limits $46,350 $52 ,950 $59,550
4. Intention to use state policy or develop more restrictive local policy
State policy
4
$66,150
5
$71,450
4
SECTION 6: PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT
Homeowner Rehabilitation-$200,000
1. Unmet Needs Addressed by the Project
The City is allocating $200,000 for homeowners who are still in need of rehabilitation to their homes
in Cole County . The homeowner rehabilitation program will help rebuild the community's housing
stock and avoid the displacement of homeowners due to deterioration by the disaster.
Up to $50,000 maximum per housing unit is available .
2. Anticipated National Objective(s)
Low/Mod Housing Benefit (LMH), Low/Mod Income (LMI), Low/Mod Housing Benefit, CDFI, or NRSA
(LMHSP), and Urgent Need (URG).
3. Project/Beneficiary Solicitation Methodology
The City of Jefferson will advertise the Homeowner Rehabilitation Program on the City's website .
The Homeowner Rehabilitation Program will be shared with local non-profits to enable them to
share it throughout their organizations . The City will also work with homeowners that are now
experience code compliance issues due to tornado damage.
One hundred percent of the beneficiaries will be Low to Moderate Income persons. The City of
Jefferson will utilize HUD's most current Income Guidelines to determine eligibility for this program.
Properties must be located in Cole County and a direct tie-back to tornado damage.
2022 HUD Income Guidelines (Effective Aprill8, 2022)
Persons in
Household 1 2 3 4 5
Income Limits $46,350 $52,950 $59,550 $66,150 $71,450
4. Intention to use state policy or develop more restrictive local policy
The City of Jefferson intends to develop a local policy unless the State adopts a usable policy .
5
SECTION 6: PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT
Infrastructure to Support Housing Recovery Efforts and Affordable Housing-$1,000,000
1. Unmet Needs Addressed by the Project
During the recovery phase, many sidewalks and roads were destroyed by the heavy equipment used
to clean up debris that was left from the tornado. The disaster impacted areas with already aging
infrastructure. Residents experienced challenges when building back new structures that are
supported by aging infrastructure .
The City intends to fund infrastructure projects that will support housing recovery .
2. Anticipated National Objective(s)
Low/Mod A rea Benefit (LMA), Low/Mod Housing Benefit (LMH), and Urgent Need (URG).
3. Project/Beneficiary Solicitation Methodology
Infrastructure projects must support housing recovery and restoration . The City will provide
mitigation concerning water/sewer/stormwater, streets, and drainage systems that directly improve
the quality of life for all residents and provides a foundation that enables housing recovery in
impacted areas.
The infrastructure program will be one of the last programs to be launched in order to best provide
the service in areas needing the greatest support.
4. Intention to use state policy or deve lop more restrictive local policy
The City of Jefferson intends to develop a local policy unless the State adopts a usable policy.
6
SECTION 6: PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT
Public Service-$5,000
1. Unmet Needs Addressed by the Project
As a way to complement the down-payment assistance program and the single-family new
construction program, the City of Jefferson will contract a housing counseling agency to assist
households impacted by the disaste r in making informed housing decisions, $750 per beneficiary is
available.
2. Anticipated National Objective(s)
Low to Moderate Income (LMIL Low/Mod Housing Benefit (LMHL Urgent Need
3. Project/Beneficiary Solicitation Methodology
The City of Jefferson will advertise the Housing Counseling Program on the City's website .
Participants ofthe down-payment assistance program, single-family new construction program, and
Homeowner Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Programs are eligible to utilize this program. The
Housing Counseling Program will be shared with local non-profits to enable them to share it
throughout their organizations.
One hundred percent of the beneficiaries will be Low to Moderate Income persons. The City of
Jefferson will utilize HUD's most current Income Guidelines to determine eligibility for this program.
Properties must be located in Cole County.
2022 HUD Income Guidelines (Effective April18, 2022)
Persons in 1 2 3 Household
Income Limits $46,350 $52,950 $59,550
4. Intention to use state policy or develop more restrictive local policy
State policy
4
$66,150
5
$71,450
7
SECTION 6: PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT
Planning-$50,000
1. Unmet Needs Addressed by the Project
Eligible planning activities include activities that promote mitigation, preparedness, and resilience .
Planning projects may also include housing needs analysis.
2. Anticipated National Objective(s)
Per DR-4451 Action Plan, page 103, "Planning is presumed to meet a National Objective under the
Entitlement Regulations"
3. Project/Beneficiary Solicitation Methodology
The City of Jefferson may conduct a planning activity or provide funding to local non-profits for
planning document projects .
4. Intention to use state policy or develop mor e restrictive local policy
The City of Jefferson intends to use the State's policy on Planning .
8
SECTION 6: PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT
Local Voluntary Buyout-$0
1. Unmet Needs Addressed by the Project
The City of Jefferson is not utilizing this program as it did not experience extensive flooding in 2019 .
2. Anticipated National Objective(s)
N/A
3. Project/Beneficiary Solicitation Methodology
N/A
4. Intention to use state policy or develop more restrictive local policy
N/A
9
SECTION 6: PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT
Housing Incentive (or Replacement Assistance
1. Unmet Needs Addressed by the Project
This program will provide temporary relocation assistance for persons that may be displaced due to
a CDBG-DR funded program .
2. Anticipated National Objective(s)
LMH, LMB, LMHI, and Urgent Need
3. Project/Beneficiary Solicitation Methodology
One hundred percent of the beneficiaries will be Low to Moderate Income persons. The City of
Jefferson will utilize HUD's most current Income Guidelines to determine e ligibility for this program.
Properties must be located in Cole County
2022 HUD Income Guidelines (Effective April 18, 2022)
Persons in 1 2 3 4 5 Household
Income Limits $46,350 $52,950 $59,550 $66,150 $71,450
4. Intention to use state policy or develop more restrictive local policy
The City of Jefferson intends to develop a more restrictive local policy unless the State adopts a
usable policy .
10
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES
MEMORANDUM
TO: Public Works and Planning Committee
THROUGH: Sonny Sanders, Director of Planning and Protective Services
FROM: Anne Stratman, Neighborhood Services Specialist
DATE: July 14,2022
RE: CDBG 2022 Annual Action Plan
The City of Jefferson annually receives federal funding from U.S . Department of
Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) Program. As a result, the City is required to prepare an Action Plan every year
to address the community development needs affecting low and moder ate income
residents of City of Jefferson. Various community development projects in the city are
funded in part with grants received from HUD. These grants enable the City to
provide decent affordable housing, economic development opportunities,
neighborhood improvements and community development services for the low and
moderate income residents of City of Jefferson.
In May, 2022 HUD notified the City of the 2022 allocation in the amount of $290,586.
The City has updated the 2022 Annual Action Plan to reflect the actual allocation
amount that is distributed between the Down Payment Assistance, Emergency
Assistance Repair Program, Infrastructure Improvement and Demolition programs.
Program Priority Need Budget Impact
Down Payment Affordable Housing $50 ,920 10 Households
Emergency Assistance Repair Sustainable Housing $25 ,135 5 Households
Program
Infrastructure Improvements Improve Neighborhoods $121 ,414 3 ,000 Individuals
Demolition Removal of Slum & Bli g ht $20 ,000 1 Building
Administration $58 ,117
Program De livery 15,000
Total Expenditures $290,586
Public hearing was held on June 24,2022 and copies of the 2022 Action Plan are
available at City Hall, Missouri River Regional Library. El Puente Hispanic Ministries
and Public Housing Authority. Comments are being accepted on the proposed budget
through Sunday, July 24, 2022. To access the 2022 Annual Action Plan and/or learn
how to comment visit
www.jeffersoncitymo.gov/government/redev elopment and grants!plans.php.
The 2022 Annual Action Plan will be considered for approval by Council via Resolution
during the August 1, 2022, Council meeting. The 2022 Annual Action Plan is to be
submitted to HUD on or before August 16, 2022.
City of Jefferson
2022 Annual Action Plan
Contents
Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................ 2
AP-05 Executive Summary-24 CFR 91.200(c), 91.220(b) ........................................................................ 2
PR-OS Lead & Responsible Agencies-91.200(b) ...................................................................................... 4
AP -10 Consultation-91.100, 91.200(b), 91.215(1) ................................................................................... 5
AP-12 Participation-91.105, 91.200(c) ................................................................................................. 11
Expected Resources .................................................................................................................................... 14
AP-15 Expected Resources-91.220(c)(1,2) .............................................. Error! Bookmark not defined.
Annual Goals and Objectives ...................................................................................................................... 15
Projects ................................................................................................................................................... 18
AP-35 Projects-91.220(d) ..................................................................................................................... 18
AP-50 Geographic Distribution-91.220(f) ............................................................................................. 22
Affordable Housing ..................................................................................................................................... 23
AP-55 Affordable Housing-91.220(g) ................................................................................................... 23
AP-60 Public Housing-91.220(h) ........................................................................................................... 24
AP-65 Homeless and Other Special Needs Activities-91.220(i) ............................................................ 26
AP-75 Barriers to affordable housing-91.220(j) ................................................................................... 28
AP-85 Other Actions-91.220(k) ............................................................................................................ 29
Program Specific Requirements .................................................................................................................. 32
Index of Attachments .................................................................................................................................. 33
OMB Control No : 250 6-0117 (e xp . 06/30/2020)
Annual Action Plan
2022
1
Executive Summary
AP-05 Executive Summary-24 CFR 91.200{c), 91.220{b)
1. Introduction
The City of Jefferson in coordination with multiple community partners collaborated to develop the
City's Annual Action Plan for HUD's Fiscal Year 2022. The Plan describes the strategic investments of
resources to implement specific programs that meet the year's strategic goals for the US Department of
Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG). CDBG
funding outlined in this Action Plan will be active January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023.
2. Summarize the objectives and outcomes identified in the Plan
The City's goals for the 2023 planning period focus on continuing neighborhood revitalization efforts,
providing affordable housing, creating sustainable living environments and improving economic
opportunities.
Specifically, the City will do the following:
• Provide Decent, Affordable Housing:
Provide direct financial assistance to 10 low to moderate income households for the purchase of
a single-family residence.
• Create Sustainable Living Environments:
Annually assist 10 low income homeowners with needed rehabilitation to address code
deficiencies, energy efficiency, accessibility and/or emergency repairs.
Invest city wide to eliminate slum and blight (demolition), improve public facilities and work
toward a greater accessibility of public infrastructure, especially sidewalks, to benefit people
with disabilities and residents traveling by foot, bike or other non-vehicular forms.
• Improve Economic Opportunity:
By completing infrastructure improvements within census tracts 105, 106 and 207. Planned
infrastructure improvements include sidewalks, curb and gutter improvements along Adams
Street and Hickory Street. It is estimated that approximately 3,000 individuals would be benefit
from improvements within the qualified census tract areas, which may increase property
values as well.
3. Evaluation of past performance
A review of past Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Reports (CAPER) reveals a strong
focus on community needs that continue to exist including aging housing and infrastructure and
neighborhood and public improvements. The 2021 CAPER documents accomplishments included
completing 2 Homeowner Support property improvements for LMI homeowners, 30 First Time LMI
homebuyers were assisted with $5,000 in down payment assistance. Within the Neighborhood
Improvement Program 2 blighted properties were demolished.
4. Summary of Citizen Participation Process and consultation process
The Citizen Participation and consultation process for the 2022 Annual Action Plan was achieved
through a variety of strategies, including survey, direct correspondence, and outreach to community
Annual Action Plan 2
2022
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2020)
organizations. All efforts were made to contact appropriate parties and obtain thorough input. These
consultations with participation from citizens provided the plan direction and scope. A survey monkey
was made available and sent to members of the local Unmet Needs Committee, churches and other
organizations with encouragement to pass the survey on to their clients and others who may be
interested. The survey was open from May 16, 2022 until June 6, 2022. The survey requested input to
assess the needs of the community. The first public meeting was held May 25, 2022, at City Hall
Boone/Bancroft Conference Room. A public hearing was held on June 24, 2022 at City Hall in the City
Council Chambers and virtually to present the draft copy of the 2022 Annual Action Plan. A notice was
published in the News Tribune on June 19, 2022. The draft copy of the 2022 Annual Action Plan was
made available on www.jeffersoncitymo.gov on June 24, 2022. The draft plan was made available the
day of the public meeting for viewing at City Hall, Jefferson City Public Housing Authority, Missouri River
Regional Library and El Puente-Hispanic Ministry and at www.jeffersoncitymo.gov. Comments
regarding the draft plan were accepted through July 24, 2022. The final draft of Annual Action Plan was
presented to City Council on August 1, 2022 for consideration of adoption via resolution.
5. Summary of public comments
Summary of comments received through survey monkey supported more funding to be directed to
more down payment assistance and infrastructure improvements.
Based on the comments and analyzing survey monkey rankings, it was determined that the public
services category ranked the lowest.
6. Summary of comments or views not accepted and the reasons for not accepting them
During the participatory budgeting activity some suggestions were provided that are not currently
identified within the 2019-2023 Consolidated Plan such as rental assistance. These suggestions will be
kept and included as potential for the next 5-year planning process.
7. Summary
There were multiple opportunities for the public to participate in the draft 2022 Annual Action Plan.
Surveys, public hearings and meetings regarding the plan were discussed at Unmet Needs Committee
meetings which are comprised of local service non-profit agencies.
OMS Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2020)
Annual Action Plan
2022
3
PR-05 Lead & Responsible Agencies-91.200{b}
1. Agency/entity responsible for preparing/administering the Consolidated Plan
Describe the agency/entity responsible for preparing the Consolidated Plan and those responsible for administration of each grant
program and funding source .
Agency Role Name Department/ Agency
Lead Agency JEFFERSON CITY
CDBG Administrator JEFFERSON CITY Department of Planning and Protective Services
Table 1 -Responsible Agencies
Narrative (optional)
The City's Neighborhood Services Division, housed in the City's Department of Planning & Protective Services coordinated the development of
the Consolidated Plan, the Annual Action Plans, and the Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report. All questions or concerns about
the Consolidated Plan should be directed to the Neighborhood Services Supervisor.
Consolidated Plan Public Contact Information:
RacheiSenzee
Neighborhood Services Supervisor
320 East McCarty St
Jefferson City, MO 65101
573-634-6410
jcplanning@jeffe rsoncitymo.gov
For access to reports, documents, public meeting information, and for new and information pertinent to administration of the Community
Development Block Grant visit www.jeffersoncitymo.gov/government/redevelopment and grants/plans.php .
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (e xp . 06/30/2020)
Annual Action Plan
2022
4
AP-10 Consultation-91.100, 91.200(b), 91.215(1)
1. Introduction
Consultation for the 2022 Annual Action Plan was achieved through a variety of strategies, including
public hearings, surveys, direct correspondence, and public meetings. All efforts were made to contact
appropriate parties and obtain thorough input. These consultations, in conjunction with participation
from citizens, provided the plan direction and scope.
Provide a concise summary of the jurisdiction's activities to enhance coordination between
public and assisted housing providers and private and governmental health, mental health
and service agencies (91.215(1))
Activities to enhance coordination between public and assisted housing providers and governmental
health, mental health and service agencies are conducted on a regular basis. The City of Jefferson's
activities will include City staff participating in local and regional committees such as the Unmet Needs
Committee and Missouri Balance of State Continuum of Care. A continued coordination is anticipated
for planning efforts, as well as project implementation, between all of these groups.
Describe coordination with the Continuum of Care and efforts to address the needs of
homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with
children, veterans, and unaccompanied youth) and persons at risk of homelessness.
The Continuum of Care (CoC) Program is designed to promote communitywide commitment to the goal
of ending homelessness; provide funding for efforts by nonprofit providers, and encourage state and
local governments to quickly rehouse homeless individuals and families while minimizing the trauma
and dislocation caused to homeless individuals, families, and communities by homelessness. In addition,
the CoC promotes access to end and effect utilization of mainstream programs by homeless individuals
and families; and optimizes self-sufficiency among individuals and families experiencing homelessness.
The Missouri Balance of State (BoS) Continuum of Care (CoC) includes 101 counties of Missouri. The BoS
CoC is governed by the Governance Charter established June 14, 2017. Community Partnership of
Southeast Missouri serves as the Collaborative Applicant for the BoS CoC.
Purpose of the CoC and CoC Board:
The Missouri BoS CoC is the planning body that coordinates the community's policies, strategies, and
activities toward ending homelessness for 101 counties of the Balance of State of Missouri. Its work
includes gathering and analyzing information in order to determine the local needs of people
experiencing homelessness, implementing strategic responses, educating the community on homeless
issues, providing advice and input on the operations of homeless services, and measuring project and
system level CoC performance. The Board establishes the process for applying, reviewing and prioritizing
project applications for funding in the annual HUD Homeless Assistance CoC Grants competition.
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2020)
Annual Action Plan
2022
5
Responsibilities of the CoC:
The Missouri Balance of State CoC and BoS CoC Board Responsibilities include the following activities:
Operating a Continuum of Care, CoC Planning, Designating and Operating a HMIS, and Preparing
Applications for CoC funds, per the Continuum of Care/HEARTH Interim Rule 24 CFR 578. These
responsibilities may be delegated for oversight and administration to the Missouri BoS Collaborative
Applicant, Missouri BoS HMIS Lead, and/or Missouri BoS CoC staff.
The City of Jefferson is located within Region 5 of Balance of State Continuum Care (CoC) which includes
the counties of Audrain, Boone Callaway, Camden, Cole, Cooper, Gasconade, Howard, Maries, Miller,
Montgomery, Moniteau, Morgan, Osage, Phelps, and Pulaski.
Describe consultation with the Continuum(s) of Care that serves the jurisdiction's area in
determining how to allocate ESG funds, develop performance standards for and evaluate
outcomes of projects and activities assisted by ESG funds, and develop funding, policies and
procedures for the operation and administration of HMIS
The City of Jefferson does not receive direct allocation of ESG funds. The Missouri Housing
Development Commission, in collaboration with the Missouri Department of Social Services, publishes
Notice of Funding Availability on their website http://www.mhdc.com/ci/esg/. The funds are allocated
in a competitive process in accordance with the Allocation Plan .
A Homeless Management Information System (HMIS) is a software application designed to record and
store client-level information on the characteristics and service needs of homeless persons. A HMIS is
typically a web-based software application that homeless assistance providers use to coordinate care,
manage their operations, and better serve their clients. A HMIS allows homeless assistance providers
within a community to establish a more coordinated and effective housing and service delivery system.
In Missouri, several HMIS providers serve the homeless assistance programs. Missouri Housing
Development Commission (MHDC) utilizes Institute for Community Alliances to support the data for the
Missouri Housing Trust Fund, Housing First Program, and the Point-In Time Count Homeless Study.
2. Describe Agencies, groups, organizations and others who participated in the process
and describe the jurisdiction's consultations with housing, social service agencies and other
entities
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2020)
Annual Action Plan
2022
6
Table 2-Agencies, groups, organizations who participated
1
2
3
Agency/Group/Organization Public Housing Authority
Agency/Group/Organization Type Housing
PHA
What section of the Plan was addressed by Public Housing Needs
Consultation?
How was the Agency/Group/Organization The Jefferson City Housing Authority provides and
consulted and what are the anticipated coordinates housing between private, subsidized and
outcomes of the consultation or areas for public housing services.
improved coordination?
Agency/Group/Organization River City Habitat for Humanity
Agency/Group/Organization Type Housing
Services -Housing
What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Need Assessment
Consultation? Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the Agency/Group/Organization River City Habitat for Humanity builds quality, low
consulted and what are the anticipated cost homes that are then sold to families at 0%
outcomes of the consultation or areas for interest over 25 years. The City partners with Habitat
improved coordination? through the CDBG program by demolishing
properties in order for Habitat to reconstruct single
family houses to be sold to income qualified
households.
Agency/Group/Organization Department of Mental Health
Agency/Group/Organization Type Housing
Services -Housing
Services-homeless
Other government -State
What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Need Assessment
Consultation? Homelessness Strategy
Homelessness Needs -Chronically homeless
Homelessness Needs -Families with children
Homelessness Needs -Veterans
Homelessness Needs-Unaccompanied youth
Non-Homelessness Special Needs
Annual Action Plan
2022
7
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2020)
4
5
How was the Agency/Group/Organization Department of Mental Health provides Shelter Plus
consulted and what are the anticipated Care funding that is obtained from Continuum of
outcomes of the consultation or areas for Care and passes it on to local non-for-profit agencies
improved coordination? around the rural areas of Missouri.
Agency/Group/Organization Community Partnership of Southeast Missouri
Agency/Group/Organization Type Housing
Services -Housing
Services-homeless
Services-Victims
Other government -State
What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Need Assessment
Consultation? Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs -Chronically homeless
Homelessness Needs -Families with children
Homelessness Needs -Veterans
Homelessness Needs -Unaccompanied youth
Non-Homelessness Special Needs
How was the Agency/Group/Organization MO BoS provides technical support to agencies in
consulted and what are the anticipated and around the MO BoS; provide point-in-time count
outcomes of the consultation or areas for report; provide support to the governing board,
improved coordination? facilitate training opportunities, and coordinate with
HMIS lead to capture HUD required data.
Agency/Group/Organization Central Missouri Community Action
Agency/Group/Organization Type Services -Housing
Services-Children
Services-Education
What section of the Plan was addressed by Anti-poverty Strategy
Consultation?
How was the Agency/Group/Organization Central Missouri Community Action Agency is a non-
consulted and what are the anticipated profit agency dedicated to eliminating poverty in
outcomes of the consultation or areas for Mid-Missouri. CMCA provides comprehensive
improved coordination? services to meet the needs of individuals and families
struggling, dedicated to eradicating the causes and
conditions of poverty.
Annual Action Plan
2022
8
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2020)
6 Agency/Group/Organization CAMPO
Agency/Group/Organization Type Other government -Local
Regional organization
Planning organization
What section of the Plan was addressed by Non-Homelessness Special Needs
Consultation? Transportation
How was the Agency/Group/Organization Capital Area Metropolitan Organization (CAMPO)
consulted and what are the anticipated contributes to the quality of life for the Capital area
outcomes of the consultation or areas for planning area by achieving and supporting
improved coordination? cooperative, comprehensive and continuing
transportation planning as outlined in the FAST Act.
Identify any Agency Types not consulted and provide rationale for not consulting
Please note that local agencies and service providers in the City of Jefferson were invited to participate
in the Consolidated Strategic Plan process. In addition to the publication of public hearing notices, these
organizations were provided flyers, emailed invites, etc. to all public hearing and meetings.
OMB Control No: 2506-0117lexp. 06/30/2020)
Annual Action Plan
2022
9
Other local/regional/state/federal planning efforts considered when preparing the Plan
Name of Plan Lead How do the goals of your Strategic Plan overlap with the goals of each
Organization plan?
Continuum of Community Addressing the needs of persons experience homelessness is called out
Care Partnership specifically in the goals of the 2022 Annual Plan. Community
of Southeast Partnership of Southeast Missouri is the lead applicant for the Missouri
Missouri Balance of State Continuum of Care (CoC) Lead and has served as a
guiding effort to coordinate a system of services across the 101 counties
of Missouri Balance of State.
2018 Analysis Mid-MO The Regional Planning Commission aided the City of Jefferson with the
of Impediments Regional completion of the 2018 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing.
to Fair Housing Planning
Commission
Jefferson City Jefferson City The goals of JCHA strategic plan and the Consolidated Plan align well.
Housing Housing Specifically, the strategic plan calls for JCHA for providing housing to low
Authority Authority income households.
Strategic Plan
Capital Area CAMPO Connect walking, bicycling and transit facilities to housing, employment,
Pedestrian & businesses and essential services.
Bicycle Plan
2045 & Beyond CAMPO A long-range transportation plan fostering 1) mobility and access for
Metropolitan people and goods, 2) efficient system performance and preservation
Transportation and 3) quality of life.
Plan
Gap Analysis Missouri The report uses 2018 data to evaluate the current system, identify
Report Balance of existing gaps, and make recommendations designed to improve the
State overall system of care to better address the needs of the homeless
population in the Missouri Balance of State CoC region.
Comprehensive City of The Comprehensive Plan identifies several overlapping goals, including:
Plan Jefferson enhancing Jefferson City's housing environment, promoting
neighborhood stabilization, and establishing an equitable housing
environment.
Table 3-Other local/ regional/ federal planning efforts
Narrative (optional)
The City of Jefferson, Planning and Protective Services Department, Neighborhood Services Division, is
the lead agency for the development of the Consolidated Plan and the administration and management
of Community Development Block Grant funding. The City is not a direct recipient of Emergency
Solutions Grant, Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS and the HOME Investment Partnership
program.
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2020)
Annual Action Plan
2022
10
AP-12 Participation-91.105, 91.200(c)
1. Summary of citizen participation process/Efforts made to broaden citizen participation
Summarize citizen participation process and how it impacted goal-setting
The City relies on existing planning and needs identification at the community, departmental and other
stakeholder level to inform the list of services prioritized for HUD federal grant allocations. The list
below highlights key plans that informed the 2022 Annual Action Plan as submitted as part ofthis five-
year plan. See PR-10 and PR-15 of this plan for details and links to the listed plans.
Each of the planning efforts listed involved community engagement and public input in a variety of
forms. The engagement and input include a variety of digital surveys, community engagement one-on-
one with constituents at neighborhood meetings, forums and public meetings that may not have
focused on the Consolidated Plan itself but were pertinent to one or more of the topics addressed by
this plan. Public comments directly related to Consolidated Plan goals and issues were extracted from
multiple City Department websites. Additionally, the City conducted as much outreach to public
commissions, advocates and public and non-profit stakeholders as possible within each initiative.
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2020)
Annual Action Plan
2022
11
Citizen Participation Outreach
Sort Mode of Target of
Order Outreach Outreach
In ternet Non-
Outreach targeted/
broad
community
1
Public Non-
Meeting targeted/
broad
community
2
Summary of Summary of
response/ comments
attendance received
A survey Twenty-eight
monkey was parti cip ants
made available took the
from May 16, survey.
2022 to June 6,
2022 . It was
sent out via
constant
contact and
Unmet Needs
Committee and
po sted on the
City's
homep age .
Th e first public Comme nts
meeting on the were received
2022 Annual pertain ing to
Action Plan was the Public
held in the Services
Boone Bancroft category.
Conference
Room on May
25, 2022. Public
notice was
published
within the
Jefferson City
News Tribune
on May 22,
2022 .
Annual Action Plan
2022
OMB Contro l No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2020)
Summary of URL (If applicable)
comments not
accepted
and reasons
Resp onses help ed https:/ /www.survey m
shape the 2022 onkey.com/r/NJZCPC
Annual Action Q
Plan.
Based on the
comments and
analyzing survey
monkey rankings,
it was determined
that the public
services category
ranked the lowest
12
Sort Mode of Target of
Order Outreach Outreach
Public Non -
Meeting targeted /
bro ad
comm u nity
3
Summary of Summary of Summary of
response/ comments comments not
attendance received accepted
and reasons
The second N/A
pub li c meet ing
was held in the
City Counc il
Chambers and
virtua ll y on
June 24, 2022,
to revea l t he
draft plan .
Pub lished in
News Tribune
on June 19,
2022 . Posted at
City Hall, the
Public Housing
Authority,
Missouri River
Regiona l
Library, El
Puente
Hispanic
Ministries and
www.jefferson
citymo .gov.
Comments on
the draft plan
were accepted
t hroug h Ju ly
24, 2022.
. . .. Table 4-C1t1zen Part1c1pat1on Outreach
Annual Action Plan
2022
OMB Control No : 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2020)
URL (If applicable)
13
Expected Resources P
Overall resources in 2022 from the Annual Action Plan are expected to remain substantially similar to recent years. The City of Jefferson
coordinates HUD's Consolidated Plan funds with other City resources such as Neighborhood Reinvestment Act Programs to provide for
affordable housing, community and economic development.
Anticipated Resources
Program Source of Uses of Funds Expected Amount Available Year 4 Expected Narrative Description
Funds Annual Program Prior Year Total: Amount
Allocation: Income:$ Resources: $ Available
$ $ Remainder
ofConPian
$
CDBG public-Acquisition City anticipates receiving
federal Admin and $290,586 in CDBG allocation.
Planning
Economic
Development
Housing
Public
Improvements
Public Services 290,586 0 290,586 300,000
Table 5 -Expected Resources-Priority Table
Explain how federal funds will leverage those additional resources (private, state and local funds), including a description of how
matching requirements will be satisfied
The City does not receive HUD funding for HOME, HOPWA or ESG. The City's CDBG allocation will complement a number of other federal
resources, as well as state and local resources. The primary resources are: 1) Neighborhood Reinvestment Act programs; 2) Consolidated
Planning grant from Federal Transit Administration, 3) Capital Area Improvement Funds, and 4) Historic Preservation Fund grants.
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2020)
Annual Action Plan
2022
14
AP-20 Annual Goals and Objectives
Goals Summary Information
Sort Goal Name Start End
Order Year Year
1 Homebuyer Assistance 2019 2023
2 Homebuyer Education 2019 2023
3 Owner Occupied 2019 2023
Rehabilitation
4 Infrastructure Projects 2019 2023
5 Removal of 2019 2023
Dilapidated Structures
6 Administration 2019 2023
7 Program Delivery 2019 2023
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2020)
Annual Goals and Objectives
Category Geographic Needs
Area Addressed
Affordable Citywide Increased
Housing Homeownership
Affordable Citywide Increased
Housing Homeownership
Affordable Citywide Preservation of
Housing Existing Housing
Non-Housing Census Public
Community Tract 105, Infrastructure
Development 106&207
Affordable Citywide Removal of
Housing Dilapidated
Non-Housing Structures
Community
Development
Administration
Program
Delivery
Table 6-Goals Summary
Annual Action Plan
2022
Funding Goal Outcome Indicator
CDBG: Direct Financial Assistance to Homebuyers: 10
$50,270 Households Assisted
CDBG: Direct Financial Assistance to Homebuyers: 10
$650 Households Assisted
CDBG: Homeowner Housing Rehabilitated: 5 Households
$25,135 Assisted
CDBG: Public Facility or Infrastructure Activities other than
$121,414 Low/Moderate Income Housing Benefit: 3000 Persons
Assisted
CDBG: Buildings Demolished: 1 Building
$20,000
CDBG:
$58,117
CDBG:
$15,000
15
Goal Descriptions
1 Goal Name
Goal Description
2 Goal Name
Goal Description
3 Goal Name
Goal Description
4 Goal Name
Goal Description
5 Goal Name
Goal Description
6 Goal Name
Goal Description
7 Goal Name
Goal Description
Down Payment Assistance
Provide assistance to eligible income households for the down payment and/or closing costs towards a purchase of a
single-family residence.
Homebuyer Education
Part ofthe direct financial assistance for buying a single-family home, the applicant must successfully complete a
homebuyer education program.
Owner Occupied Rehabilitation
Provide assistance to income eligible households with exterior improvements and/or replacement of aging HVAC
system and/or water heater.
Infrastructure projects
Complete infrastructure construction projects within eligible income census tracts.
Removal of dilapidated structures
Complete demolition of vacant properties.
Administration
Administration of the CDBG Program.
Program Delivery
Implementation of eligible activities.
Annual Action Plan
2022
16
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2020)
Estimate the number of extremely low-income, low-income, and moderate-income families to whom the jurisdiction will provide
affordable housing as defined by HOME 91.315(b)(2)
The City of Jefferson will assist extremely low-income, low-income and moderate-income families who meet the existing HUD's income limits
with programs such as down payment assistance and rehab programs for homeowners. For 2022, it is estimated that 15 low-moderate
households will be assisted with these programs.
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2020)
Annual Action Plan
2022
17
Projects
AP-35 Projects-91.220{d)
Introduction
This annual action plan is developed in the context of the City of Jefferson's overall budget of $290,586. Given all available resources and needs,
the City has determined that these proposed uses of Consolidated Plan funds gives us the greatest opportunity to achieve the City's goals, meet
its responsibilities, and address the needs of low-and moderate-income residents.
Projects
# Project Name
1 2022 CDBG Administration
2 2022 Emergency Assistance Repair Program
3 2022 Down Payment Assistance
4 2022 Homebuyer Education
5 2022 Public Infrastructure
6 2022 Demolition
7 2022 Program Delivery
Table 7 -Project Information
Describe the reasons for allocation priorities and any obstacles to addressing underserved needs
These allocations are based on needs analyses, the availability of other funds targeted to various needs, the purpose of the Consolidated Plan
funds, and the availability of City General Funds to meet a wide variety of needs.
Should HUD revenues (either annual allocation or program income) exceed the planned amount, the funding increase will be applied to various
CDBG programs and administration.
Should HUD revenues (either annual allocation or program income) are lower than the planned amount, the funding decrease will be applied to
various CDBG programs and administration.
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2020)
Annual Action Plan
2022
18
AP-38 Project Summary
Project Summary Information
1 Project Name
Target Area
Goals Supported
Needs Addressed
Funding
Description
Target Date
2 Project Name
Target Area
Goals Supported
Needs Addressed
Funding
Description
OMB Control No: 250 6-0117 (e x p . 06/30/2020)
2022 CDBG Administration
Citywide
Homebuyer Assistance
Owner Occupied Rehabilitation
Removal of dilapidated structures
Infrastructure projects
Administration
Preservation of existing housing
Increased homeownership
Removal of dilapidated structures
Public infrastructure
Public services activities
CDBG: $58,117
Administration of the CDBG Program
12/31/2023
2022 Emergency Assistance Repair Program
Citywide
Owner Occupied Rehabilitation
Preservation of existing housing
CDBG: $25,135
Assist owner occupied households with rehabilitation/repair of exterior code violations.
Assistance up to $5,000 for eligible activities.
Annual Action Plan
2022
19
Target Date
Estimate the number and type of families that
will benefit from the proposed activities
location Description
Planned Activities
3 Project Name
Target Area
Goals Supported
Needs Addressed
Funding
Description
Target Date
Estimate the number and type of families that
will benefit from the proposed activities
location Description
Planned Activities
4 Project Name
Target Area
Goals Supported
Needs Addressed
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2020)
12/31/2023
5 income eligible households will benefit from the program.
Location determined at time of application.
Activities may include replacement of water or wastewater laterals, rep lace ment of a non-
functioning furnace and/or replacement of a non-functioning air conditioner.
2022 Down Payment Assistance
Citywide
Homebuyer Assistance
Increased homeownership
CDBG: $50,920
Assist income eligible households up to $5 ,000 for down payment and/or closing costs
towards a purchase of a single-family residence.
12/31/2023
10 income eligible households will benefit from the proposed activity .
Location determined at time of application.
Down payment, home buyer education, filing of deed of trust.
2022 Public Infrastructure
Census Tract 105, 106 & 207
Infrastructure projects
Public infrastructure
Annual Action Plan
2022
20
Funding
Description
Target Date
Estimate the number and type of families that
will benefit from the proposed activities
Location Description
Planned Activities
--.
5 PJ!Qf~ :Nt~,n\IJ! . .
Target Area
Goals Supported
Needs Addressed
Funding
Description
Target Date
Estimate the number and type of families that
will benefit from the proposed activities
Location Description
Planned Activities
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2020}
CDBG: $107,414
Funding for construction projects such as sidewalks, crosswalks, water/wastewater
infrastructure.
12/31/2023
3,000 families may indirectly benefit from public infrastructure projects
Construction projects will be completed in income eligible census tracts.
Construction activities may include sidewalks, crosswalks, water/wastewater
infrastructure.
... , -.. -· ··-···--. ·-· .. -"•. ····.·,
• • 'D~l'IJCiJlftja• ·-· . ....
Citywide
Removal of dilapidated structures
Removal of dilapidated structures
CDBG: $20,000
Removal of slum and blight vacant properties.
12/31/2023
1 vacant property will be demolished.
Location to be determined
Activities include asbestos inspection, asbestos mitigation and demolition.
Annual Action Plan
2022
21
·--':' ··~: .. :
, .
--
AP-50 Geographic Distribution -91.220(f)
Description of the geographic areas of the entitlement (including areas of low-income and
minority concentration) where assistance will be directed
The City has several census tracts that are identified as to having at least 51% Low-Moderate Income
households. These census tracts are 105, 106 and 207 and are specifically targeted as they are areas of
low income and minority concentration. Public improvements are concentrated within these census
tracts because they qualify area wide. By the nature of the homeowner support programs and down
payment assistance, funding will directly go to low-to-moderate income households citywide as they all
require individual verification of income for the assistance. It's anticipated that funding for slum and
blight removal will assist local non-profits with reconstruction for low income housing, or removal of
structures from floodplain.
Geographic Distribution
Target Area Percentage of Funds
Citywide 58
Census Tract 105, 106 & 207 42
Table 8 -Geographic Distribution
Rationale for the priorities for allocating investments geographically
Within the 2022 Action Plan, CDBG funding for public improvements will be directed to low-to-moderate
income households within census tract 105.
This area has a lack of overall investment, despite being one of the more urbanly dense neighborhoods
in the city. Sidewalks along Adams and Hickory Streets will provide a better quality living environment
for the Southside Neighborhood, and provide a safe connection to the school and park.
Discussion
At present, the City is not implementing any official HUD designated geographic based priority areas
such as Empowerment Zone or Brownfields. Regardless of focus on a particular geographic area, this
Consolidated Plan will prioritize projects that meet the following criteria:
• Meet one or more of the established Consolidated Plan Goals for 2019-2023;
• Address and/or mitigate issues identified in the Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing;
• Leverage the work of other City and/or JCHA adopted plans or initiatives.
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2020)
Annual Action Plan
2022
22
Affordable Housing
AP-55 Affordable Housing -91.220(g)
Introduction
The City is not a recipient of HOME, ESG or HOPWA Funds. The amount of HUD funding does not allow
for strategies such as rental production. Rental assistance funding would come from Missouri Balance
of State Continuum of Care funds.
One Year Goals for the Number of Households to be Supported
Homeless 0
Non-Homeless 0
Special-Needs 0
Total 0
Table 9-One Year Goals for Affordable Housing by Support Requirement
One Year Goals for the Number of Households Supported Through
Rental Assistance 0
The Production of New Units 0
Rehab of Existing Units 0
Acquisition of Existing Units 0
Total 0
Table 10-One Year Goals for Affordable Housing by Support Type
Discussion
The City does not receive HOPWA funds.
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2020)
Annual Action Plan
2022
23
AP-60 Public Housing-91.220(h)
Introduction
Jefferson City Housing Authority (JCHA) provides affordable housing to households with income at or
less than 80% of the Area Median Income. JCHA households are served through Public Housing , Multi-
family Project-Based Rental Assistance (PBRA), Section 42 Tax Credits, and Housing Choice Vouchers
(HCV), also referred to as Section 8 Vouchers. The Housing Authority operates 317 units of Public
Housing, 224 Section 42 Tax Credit with Multi-family Project-based Section 8, 120 Multi-family Project-
based Section 8, and 16 Section 811 PRAC units, in Jefferson City. Rent on these units is based on 30% of
the household's monthly income. The Housing Authority also operates 78 Section 42 Tax Credit units
with a reduced market rent. Currently, we have 449 families on the waiting lists , which could include
duplicate families on several lists. JCHA has 231 Housing Choice Vouchers, rent is based on 30% of the
household's monthly income and the current waiting list has 346 families, families can be on other
waiting lists and currently be housed by JCHA.
Actions planned during the next year to address the needs to public housing
Dulle Tower two elevators are being replaced work should be complete in the Summer of 2023.
Neighborhood duplexes and four-plex es were bu i lt in 1965 , neighborhood buildings are being
adequately maintained, and renovations to unit flooring began in 2020 and will continue until
completion in the summer of 2022. A grant was received to update carbon and smoke
detectors. Planning Grant for rehabilitation of HVAC systems with City is in planning stages. Renovation
of the fire exits began in 202 0 and will continue until complete over the next few years. Single family
homes built in 1981 are adequately maintained. Linden Court, units designed for the mobility impaired
and disabled, applying for a grant to update flooring, HVAC systems, and balconies.
Hamilton Tower elevator replacement, kitchens, and sewer line rehabilitation is in the process and
should continue through the summer of 2023 .
Actions to encourage public housing residents to become more involved in management and
participate in homeownership
All residents are notified via direct mail of any and all public hearings required for any proposed activity
as required by HUD for consultation with tenants, as well as other matters affecting their tenancy. JCHA
also holds family appreciation events to increase the resident involvements.
If the PHA is designated as troubled, describe the manner in which financial assistance will be
provided or other assistance
HUD has designated JCHA as a High Performer for the Housing Choice Voucher program and Standard
Performer for the Public Housing program.
Discussion
The mission of the Public Housing Authority is to provide decent, safe affordable housing, without
discrimination, for low-income or very low-income individuals or families, persons with disabilities, and
the elderly.
The Public Housing Authority continues to offer low income families affordable housing. It works closely
with local police to keep the neighborhoods drug free and to avoid crime in the area. The Authority tries
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (e xp. 06/30/2020)
Annual Action Plan
2022
24
to attract a variety of families of various socio-economic backgrounds to each of its public housing
developments. Community activities available to residents are publicized in monthly newsletters
including mini libraries in neighborhoods to provide access to free books.
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2020)
Annual Action Plan
2022
25
AP-65 Homeless and Other Special Needs Activities -91.220(i)
Introduction
There are many programs offered by local agencies in Jefferson City area. The goals and strategies are to
help individuals and families rise above, become self-sufficient, and eliminate barriers to success.
Describe the jurisdictions one-year goals and actions for reducing and ending homelessness
including:
Reaching out to homeless persons (especially unsheltered persons) and assessing their
individual needs
Missouri Balance of State Continuum of Care (MO BoS CoC) has established a coordinated entry process
with the goal of increasing the efficiency of local crisis response systems and improving fairness and
ease of access to resources. Programs and strategies help to prevent homeless ness among individuals,
families with children and youth. Programs are designed to help households achieve more stable
housing, especially those who have a history of being homeless, doubled-up, living in other temporary
housing situations due to lack of available, affordable, appropriate shelter and housing.
The MO BoS CoC provides the oversight of homeless assistance in Missouri. MO Bos CoC board
members include representatives from all regions within the Balance of State, as well as at large
representatives. Board representation includes a broad and diverse membership to represent the
homeless population served within the CoL Members are encouraged to participate from all sectors,
including victim services providers, human trafficking, sexual assault, education, healthcare, law
enforcement, local, state and federal government, emergency assistance, addiction and recovery,
formerly homeless persons, veterans, and all homeless services.
MO BoS CoC has adopted a Housing First policy to ensure that actual or perceived barriers are not
contributing factors for households remaining in homelessness longer than necessary. The policy states
that any projects included in the application for CoC funding must follow a Housing First approach. This
means the projects must allow entry into CoC programs for participants regardless oftheir income,
current or past substance use, criminal records and history of domestic violence.
Addressing the emergency shelter and transitional housing needs of homeless persons
Locally, the Salvation Army Center of Hope has a 31 bed capacity available to men, women and families
with children. In times of extreme weather they also provide additional cots. They also provide meals to
residents and other members ofthe community, no identification is required. The Center of Hope offers
a 90 day shelter that provides hot meals, a safe place to sleep, case management to help residents plan
for independent living, life skills classes, professional referrals, and laundry facilities.
The Rape and Abuse Crisis Service serves 9 counties in Central Missouri providing a shelter, court
advocacy, counseling, 24 hour hotline, crisis intervention, support groups and case management to
survivors of domestic violence, sexual abuse and stalking. RACS provides emergency shelter to 40
residents, including baby cribs, who have experienced domestic violence, sexual assault or stalking. A
survivor does not need to be in a shelter to utilize the Rape and Abuse Crisis Service resources.
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2020)
Annual Action Plan
2022
26
Helping homeless persons (especially chronically homeless individuals and families, families
with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) make the transition to
permanent housing and independent living, including shortening the period of time that
individuals and families experience homelessness, facilitating access for homeless individuals
and families to affordable housing units, and preventing individuals and families who were
recently homeless from becoming homeless again
Missouri Balance of State Continuum of Care (MO BoS CoC) has established a coordinated entry process
with the goal of increasing the efficiency of local crisis response systems and improving fairness and
ease of access to resources. Programs and strategies help to prevent homelessness among individuals,
families with children and youth. Programs are designed to help households achieve more stable
housing, especially those who have a history of being homeless, doubled-up, living in other temporary
housing situations due to lack of available, affordable, appropriate shelter and housing.
The MO BoS CoC provides the oversight of homeless assistance in Missouri. MO Bos CoC board
members include representatives from all regions within the Balance of State, as well as at large
representatives. Board representation includes a broad and diverse membership to represent the
homeless population served within the CoC. Members are encouraged to participate from all sectors,
including victim services providers, human trafficking, sexual assault, education, healthcare, law
enforcement, local, state and federal government, emergency assistance, addiction and recovery,
formerly homeless persons, veterans, and all homeless services.
MO BoS CoC has adopted a Housing First policy to ensure that actual or perceived barriers are not
contributing factors for households remaining in homelessness longer than necessary. The policy states
that any projects included in the application for CoC funding must follow a Housing First approach. This
means the projects must allow entry into CoC programs for participants regardless of their income,
current or past substance use, criminal records and history of domestic violence.
Helping low-income individuals and families avoid becoming homeless, especially extremely
low-income individuals and families and those who are: being discharged from publicly
funded institutions and systems of care (such as health care facilities, mental health facilities,
foster care and other youth facilities, and corrections programs and institutions); or, receiving
assistance from public or private agencies that address housing, health, social services,
employment, education, or youth needs.
There are a variety of agencies in the Jefferson City area that provide housing options and case
management assistance including those returning from mental and physical health institutions. They
provide the option of living independently in a group setting. The state of Missouri Department of
Mental Health also offers on housing assistance options such as rental assistance, home purchasing
program, home repair/weatherization assistance, home access modifications. The Independent living
Resource Center in Jefferson City offers programs that provide people with the tools to learn how to live
independently including cooking, budgeting, reading and finding employment. They also offer disability
assistance for improvements on homes for people with disabilities. The unmet needs group is also a
good resource for case management.
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2020)
Annual Action Plan
2022
27
AP-75 Barriers to affordable housing-91.2200}
Introduction
Barriers to affordable housing exist when the cost of housing or the incentives to develop, maintain, or
improve affordable housing are affected by public policies, particularly those of the local jurisdiction .
Such policies may include land use controls, zoning ordinances, building codes, and policies that affect
the return on residential investment.
Aging housing stock and vacant dwellings are a barrier. 45 .0% ofthe homes were built between 1970
and 1999. 28 .5% of the homes were built between 1940 and 1969. Single family homes comprised of
50.7%; 10.9% of properties within Jefferson City are vacant.
(https ://www.neighborhoodscout.com/mo/jefferson -city/real -estate )
The 2019 tornado is a barrier to affordable housing due to damaging 516 residential buildings . The
tornado destroyed a portion of the LMI housing stock leaving people on a wait list.
Actions it planned to remove or ameliorate the negative effects of public policies that serve as
barriers to affordable housing such as land use controls, tax policies affecting land, zoning ordinances,
building codes, fees and charges, growth limitations, and policies affecting the return on residential
investment
The following actions will be addressed in the 2022 Action Plan:
1. The City will update information on its website related to Fair Housing
2. The City will market exist i ng programs through the City's website, social media, and the local
newspaper in order to reach LM I beneficiaries
3. Work on attracting developers to construct rental housing units by promoting and packaging
existing incentives
4 . Work with the Human Relations Commission to address fair housing issues in Jefferson City
Discussion:
The City of Jefferson has updated the Citizen Participation Plan to be compliant with the implementation
of the Assessment of Fair Housing. In the fall of 2022 the City will start the process of updating the
Impediments to Fair Housing Analysis.
OMB Control No : 2506-0117 (e xp. 06/30/2020)
Annual Action Plan
2022
28
AP-85 Other Actions -91.220(k)
Actions planned to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs
The City will work with agencies participating with the Unmet Needs Committee to address the
obstacles to meeting underserved needs. City staff cooperates with the Salvation Army through the
Unmet Needs Committee to stay aware of the needs of the shelter.
Actions planned to foster and maintain affordable housing
The City currently has several programs within the Neighborhood Reinvestment Act (NRA) including
Residential Tax Reimbursement Program, Residential Down Payment Assistance. These programs
are locally funded and intended to foster affordable housing and create improvements within the Old
Town sector of the City.
In addition, the CDBG funded programs include emergency assistance repair in areas of code
deficiencies, energy efficiency upgrades, and accessibility and emergency repairs. This program aids in
maintaining affordability and sustainability by keeping the homeowners within their homes by
correcting code deficiencies; increasing energy efficiency which potentially lower utility bills; completing
ADA accessibility retro-fits; and/or repairing emergency health and safety issues such as replacing the
wastewater connection.
The CDBG Down Payment Assistance Program may aid in a household obtaining homeownership
status. The program is designed for first time low-to-moderate income homebuyers (per HUD's
definition) in purchasing a residential house within the City limits. This program is different from the City
funded NRA Down Payment Assistance as the CDBG program does not have the requirements of
purchasing a property within the "Old Town" sector. By providing assistance with down payments or
closing cost will aid in providing decent housing that is affordable.
Actions planned to reduce lead-based paint hazards
The CDBG Down Payment and Homeowner Assistance Programs require lead based paint inspections for
properties that were constructed prior to 1978.
The Down Payment Assistance Program requires a visual inspection prior to closing. lfthere are any
identified peeling paint or other lead based paint hazards positively identified through testing the buyer
could be entitled to an additional $500 in order to mitigate the lead based paint hazard.
As for the Homeowner Support Programs any painted areas that will be disturbed with rehabilitation
will be tested for lead based paint. The areas positively identified as having lead based paint the EPA
certified contractors shall repair the surfaces disturbed and include safe work practices clearance.
Actions planned to reduce the number of poverty-level families
The City intends to continue support for the Project Homeless Connect held annually in October. Project
Homeless Connect is a one-day, one-stop event that connects individuals and families experiencing
homelessness with on-site medical care and a variety of social services. Project Homeless Connect is a
homeless services delivery model, first introduced in San Francisco in 2004. Since that time, more than
200 communities in the United States, Canada, Puerto Rico and Australia have hosted Project Homeless
Connect events, offering homeless individuals and families' much-needed assistance.
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2020)
Annual Action Plan
2022
29
The First United Methodist Church, First Baptist Church, First Christian Church along with the Jefferson
City Homeless ness Task Force, which is made up of 22 organizations, are all collaborating to make the
project a success.
At each of the Project Homeless Connect events, numerous same-day services are delivered to homeless
individuals and families, including access to shelter/housing, food and clothing donations, legal
assistance, child care assistance, employment resources, haircuts, identification cards, medical check-
ups, mental health screening, substance abuse screening, Medicaid and Social Security applications,
vision testing and services, credit counseling, and more.
Project Homeless Connect is outcome-oriented and serves as a way to provide immediate access to
services for the homeless population. The goals of the day are simple:
• Improve access to services and housing for the homeless consumers in Jefferson City
• Engage and increase the collaboration of homeless consumers, local businesses, non-profit
agencies, and individual volunteers to create solutions for homeless ness.
• Improve the system of care by creating opportunities and sharing "best practices" among
homeless providers in our community.
• Improve the system of care by creating opportunities and sharing "best practices" among
homeless providers in our community.
• The Down Payment Assistance Program provides LMI households $5,000.00 towards purchasing
a single-family home. One of the conditions of final approval, is that the home buyer must
complete a First Time Homebuyer Education Course through a HUD sponsored agency.
• The Emergency Assistance Program provides up to $5,000.00 to LMI households to keep their
homes a suitable place to live.
• The Public Improvement/Infrastructure Program improves infrastructure by building sidewalks
in census tracts 105, 106 and 207.
• The Demolition Program removes structures that are dangerous. The City of Jefferson
demolishes the property and enters into a re-use agreement with a non-profit organization
to sell the property to an eligible homebuyer.
Actions planned to develop institutional structure
The City partners with various local and state agencies such as the Unmet Needs Committee, Housing
Authority, River City Habitat for Humanity, MO Balance of State Continuum of Care, Homeless Task
Force, Capital City Housing Task Force, Compass Health, Transformational Housing, and State and local
departments. In addition, the City has an excellent relationship with the local Chamber of Commerce,
Jefferson City Regional Economic Partnership, and Mid-Mo Regional Planning Commission.
Actions planned to enhance coordination between public and private housing and social
service agencies
The City plans to attend the Missouri Balance of State Continuum of Care meetings. The purpose of
these meetings is to establish a network of agencies to enhance the service delivery to homeless,
disabled individuals and families, and others seeking services for their current hardship and challenges in
their lives.
In addition, the City will continue participation in the monthly Unmet Needs Committee meetings. The
Committee is comprised of various local agencies that provide updates of their existing programs and
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2020)
Annual Action Plan
2022
30
needs. Each meeting also includes a speaker and information on services an agency provides. By
collaborating together often results in ideas, suggestions and a positive outcome.
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2020)
Annual Action Plan
2022
31
Program Specific Requirements
AP-90 Program Specific Requirements-91.220(1)(1,2,4)
Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG)
Reference 24 CFR 91.220(1)(1)
Projects planned with all CDBG funds expected to be available during the year are identified in the
Projects Table. The following identifies program income that is available for use that is included in
projects to be carried out.
1. The total amount of program income that will have been received before the start of the next
program year and that has not yet been reprogrammed
2. The amount of proceeds from section 108 loan guarantees that will be used during the year to
0
address the priority needs and specific objectives identified in the grantee's strategic plan. 0
3. The amount of surplus funds from urban renewal settlements 0
4. The amount of any grant funds returned to the line of credit for which the planned use has not
been included in a prior statement or plan 0
5. The amount of income from float-funded activities 0
Total Program Income: 0
Other CDBG Requirements
1. The amount of urgent need activities
2. The estimated percentage of CDBG funds that will be used for activities that benefit
persons of low and moderate income. Overall Benefit -A consecutive period of one,
two or three years may be used to determine that a minimum overall benefit of 70%
of CDBG funds is used to benefit persons of low and moderate income. Specify the
years covered that include this Annual Action Plan.
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2020)
Annual Action Plan
2022
0
70.00%
32
Index of Attachments
• Documentation of public notices, meetings, survey and emails
• Citizen Participation Comments
• Resolution
• SF-424
• SF-4240
• Certifications
OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2020)
Annual Action Plan
2022
33
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES
MEMORANDUM
Public Works & Planning Committee
Sonny Sanders, Planning & Protective Services Director
Rachel Senzee, Neighborhood Services Supervisor
July 14, 2022
Historic Legacy District Bill
The purpose of this bill is to allow the creation of Historic Legacy Districts. Once
enacted, the ordinance would formally recognize geographical areas of historical and
cultural significance that no longer exist. A Historic Legacy District will not contain land
use regulations, but will maintain the historical narrative of a significant area in
perpetuity.
This ordinance proposal was recommended by the Historic Preservation Code Revision
Committee and the Historic Preservation Commission.
Committee Request: Recommend moving bill to Council.
For questions or comments, please contact Rachel Senzee at
rsenzee@jeffersoncitymo .gov or 573-634-6305.
ARTICLE IV. PRESERVATION AND CONSERVATION
ARTICLE IV. PRESERVATION AND CONSERVATION
See, 8 41. [)efiRitieRs.
UAiess s~eeifieally elefiAeel, werels er terms iA seetieA 8 qg ef tRis artiele sRaiiiJe iAter~reteelse as te gi·1e
tRem tRe same meaAiAg as tRey Rave iA eemmeA ~sage aAelse as te give tRis artiele its mest reaseAallle
a~~lieatieA .
Sec. 8-41. Definitions .
Unless specifically defined herein, words or terms of this article shall be interpreted so as to give them the
same meaning as they have in common usage and so as to give this article its most reasonable application.
Adaptive use . The process of changing the use of a structure or propertv to a us e other than that for which
the structure or property was originally designed or a use for a structure or property other than the use for which
it was originally designed . (Sometimes ca ll ed "adaptive reuse").
Alteration. Any act or process that changes one or more of the exterior architectural features of a structure,
including, but not limited to, the erection, construction, reconstruction or removal of any structure.
Architectura l attributes. Those physical features of bu il dings and structures that are generally identified and
described as being important products of human thought and action characteri st ic of a population or community .
Certified loca l government (CLG). A program of the Nationa l Park Service designed to promote the
preservation of prehistoric and historic sites . structures. objects, buildings and historic districts by establishing a
partnership between the local government, the State Histori c Presentation Dep artment and the Nationa l Park
Service . A certified local government carries out the purposes of the National Historic Preserv ation Act, as
amended . Each certified local government is required to maintain a system of ongoing surveys compatible with the
Missouri Historic Preservation Department process .
CJHPC. The Citv of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission.
Commissioners. Members of the City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission .
Consent. The vote as cast by owners holding majority interest in a parcel of real estate . For purposes of this
art icle, only one vote per parcel may be cast .
Conservation district. Any area designated by the CJHPC in accordance with this section as an area containing
any physical features or improvements or both which are of historical. social, cultural, architectural or aesthetic
sign ificance to the City and cause suc h area to constitute a distinctive section of the City . This overlay zone may be
used fo r areas which have distinctive characteristics that are worthy of conservation. but lack sufficient historical.
architectural or cultural significance to qualify as historic areas.
Contributing (or contributory). A significant building. site . structure or object which adds to the architectural
qualities, historic association or archeological value of an historic district because:
A. It was present during the pertinent historic time;
B. It possesses integrity and reflects its significant historic character or is capab le of yielding important
information about the pertinent historic period; or
C. It independently meets the standards and criteria of this article .
Jefferson City, Missouri, Code of Ordinances
(Supp . No. 11)
Page 1 of 14
Created: 2022-03-14 10:53 :55 (ES T]
Cultural attributes. All of the physical features of an area that. either independently or by virtue of their
interrelationship, are generally identified and described as being important products of human thought and action
characteristic of a population or community. Accordingly, the term "cu ltural attributes" necessari ly includes
"architectural attributes" as that term is defined in this section. Th e term "cu ltural attributes" does not refer to the
characteristics or beliefs of people who may reside in or frequent a particular area.
Cu ltural resource. Districts, sites, structures, objects and evidence of some importance to a culture, a
subcu lture or community for scientific, engineering, art. tradition, religious or other reasons significant in providing
resources and environmental data necessary for the study and interpretation of past lifestyles, and for interpreting
human behavior .
Department. The Department of Planning and Protective Services of the City of Jefferson, Missouri.
Design criteria. A standard of appropriate activity that will preserve the historic and architectural character
of a structure or area.
Des ignation . Official recognition of an historic landmark, conservation or historic district by the City Council
according to the procedures and provisions in this article.
Director. The Director of the Department of Planning and Protective Services. or his or her designee .
Endangered resource . A resource under a known or anticipated threat of damage to the integrity or
existence of the resource. such as :
A. An immediate threat which will resu lt in loss of or collapse of a structure:
B. An immediate threat or destruction by private action; or
C. Condemnation for code vio lat ions.
(Sometimes referred to as a "threatened resource ").
Exterior architectural appearance. The architectural character and general composition of the exterior of a
structure, including but not limited to the kind, color and texture of the building material and the type, design and
character of all windows, doors, light fixtures. signs, and appurtenant elements .
Facade. The exterior face of a building which is the architectura l front, sometimes distinguished by
elaboration or architectural or ornamenta l details .
Historic district. An area designated as an historic district by ordinance of the City Council and which may
contain within definable geographic boundaries one or more significant sites. structures or objects, and which may
have within its boundary's other properties or structures that, wh ile not of such historic and/or architectural
significance to be designated as landmarks, nevertheless to the overall virtue characteristics of the significant sites,
structures or objects located within the historic district.
Historic legacy district,.!-5-;:,A.geograp hi ca l ar ea of historical and cult ural significance for which most o f all of
the physical attr ibutes (structures, streets , public areas, archeo logica l etc.) re levant to the historical or cultural!
oe r iod of sienificance no loneer exis t!
Historic preservation. The study, identification, protection, restoration and rehabilitat ion of buildings,
structures, objects, districts, areas and sites significant in the history, architecture, archeology or culture of the
C1ty, State or nat1on.
Histo r ically or architecturally significant. Possessing that quality present in an area, site, structure, object or
district because it:
A. Is associated with an event or events that significantly contributed to the broad patterns of the history
or architectural heritage of the City, County, State or nation;
Created: 2022·93·14 10:53:55 (E ST]
(Supp . No. 11)
Pa ge 2 of 14
..--1 Formatted: Highlight
-~ Formatted : Highlight
~ Formatted: Hi ghlight
Formatted: Highlight
B. Is associated with the life or lives of a person or persons significant in the history of the Citv, County,
State or nation;
C. Embodies distinctive characteristics of a type, design, period or method of construction;
D. Represents the work of a master designer or architect or possesses high architectura l value ;
E. Exemplifies the cultural. political, economic . social or historic heritage of the City ;
F. Contains elements of design. detail, material or craftsmanship which represent a significant
construction innovation;
G . Is pa rt of or related to a squa re, p ar k or other distinctive area that was or shou ld be developed or
preserved according to a plan based on an historic or architectural motif;
H. Is an established and familiar visual feature of a neighborhood or the entire community; or
Has yielded. or is likely to yield archeological artifacts and/or information .
Key contributing. A site. structure or ob ject of such an outstanding quality and state of conservation that it
significantly adds to the arch itectura l qua li ties. historic association or archeologica l va lu es of an historic district
because:
A. It was present during the pertinent historic time;
B. It possesses and reflects its sign ifi cant historic character or is capable of yielding imp o rtant info rm ation
about the pertinent historic period; and
C. It independently meets the standards and cr iteria of the article.
Landmark . A site. structure or object designated as a landmark by ordinance of the City Council. pursuant to
procedures prescribed herein , that is worthy of rehabilitation . restoration and preservation because of its historic
and/or architectural significance to the City.
Landscape feature . Any element or component of outdoor open space including. but not limited to. fences,
walls, retaining walls. gates. sidewalks. walkways. driveways. parking lots. patios. terraces , decks. ground cover.
trees, plants, outdoor furniture, exte rior li ght sta ndards, founta ins , statuary, detached signs, and other such
elements .
Loca l historic district. A historic district established in accordance with Chapte r 8, Article IV of the City Code.
Marker. A sign used to label or identify a designated landmark or historic dist r ict as an arch itectu rall y
significant property.
National Register . The current Nationa l Register of Historic Places established by passage of the National
Historic Preservation Act of 1966. 80 Stat. 915 . 16 U.S.C. 470 et seq . as amended.
Noncontributing (or noncontributory). A site. structure or object that does not add to the architectural
qualities. historic association or archeological values of a landmark or historic district because :
A. It was not present during the pertinent time;
B. Due to alterations. distu rbances, additions or other changes. it no longer possesses integrity nor
reflects its significant histori c charact er o r is incapable of yielding imp ortant information about the
pertinent historic period ; or
C. It does not independently meet the standards and criteria of the ordinance .
Normal maintenance and repair . Any improvement or work for wh ich a building permit is not required by
City o rdin ance designed to correct deterioration. decay or damage and restore. as may be practical. a structure or
property to the condition that exis t ed prior to t he deterioration . decay or damage.
Cr ~ated : 2022-93-14 19 :53 :55 [EST)
(Supp . No . 11)
Pa ge 3 of 14
Notable structure. A structure found to be notable per the review criteria listed in subsection 8-43.G.
Object. Those physical items that have functional, aesthetic , cultural, historical or scientific value and are
relatively small in scale and simply constructed. While an object may be , by nature or design, movable, it should be
located in a specific setting or environment appropriate to its significant historic use. role or characte r. Objects
include sculptures, monuments, street signs, fence posts. hitching posts. mileposts. boundary markers, statuary
and fountains.
Owner(s) of record . Those individuals, partnerships, firms, corporations. public agencies or any other legal
entity holding title to property, but not including legal entities holding mere easements or leasehold interests.
(May also be referred to as "property owner(s)"). Current owner(s) of record are those listed as owners on the
records with the Cole County Recorder of Deeds.
Period. A chronological division identified in the analysis of the historical development to an area or region
(i.e ., Victorian, Modern).
Protection . The application of measures to defend , guard, cover or shield a building, site. structure or object
from deterioration. loss . attack, danger. or injury. In the case of bui ldings, structures or objects such measures
generally are of a protective nature and usually precede preservation measures. In the case of archeological sites,
the protective measures may be temporary or permanent.
Reconstruction/reconstruct. The reproduction of the exact form and detail of a vanished building, site,
structure or object or a part thereof, as it appeared at a pertinent time using both original and modern materials
and based on precise historical documentation and physical evidence.
Rehabilitation/rehabilitate . The act of returning a site. structure or object to a useful state through its repair
and/or alteration while retaining the characteristic features of the property which are significant to its historica l
and architectural value .
Remodeling. Modification and modern ization of a structure or property without striving to return to or
replicate the original historical and arch itectural character of the structure or property.
Removal. Any relocation of a structure in whole or in part on its site or to another site.
Repair. Any change to a structure or object that is not construction. removal or alteration.
Resource. Any site. structure. object or area that constitutes a source of present and future usefu lness.
Restoration/restore . The act of accurately recovering the form and details , based on precise historical
documentation and physical evidence, of a building, site, structure or object as it appeared at a pertinent tim e
including the removal of improvements that are not appropriate and the replacement of missing or deteriorated
features .
Site. The location of a significant event. a prehistoric or historic occupation or activity, or a building or
structure. whether standing, ruined or vanished, where the location itself possesses historic, cultural or
archeological value regardless of the va lue of any existing structure. Examples of sites include habitation sites,
burial sites, village sites, hunting and fishing sites, ce remon ial sites. battlefields, ruins of historic buildings and
structures. campsites. designed landscapes. natural textures, springs and landscapes having cultura l significance .
Stable . The area is expected to remain substantially the same over the next 20 -year period with continued
maintenance of the property. While some changes in structures, land uses and densities may occur, all such
changes are expected to be compatible with surrounding deve lopment.
Stabilizing. The area is expected to become stable over th e next 20 -year period through continued
reinvestment. maintenance or remodeling .
Standards. The Secretary of Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties, codified as 36 CFR
68 in the July 12. 1995 Federal Register (Vol. 60, No . 133!. and as revised from time to time .
Cr eated: 2022-03·14 19 :53:55 (E ST]
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 4 of 14
Structure . Anything constructed or erected, the use of which requires permanent or temporary location on
or in the ground, including, but without limiting the generality of the foregoing: buildings, fence, gazebos,
advertising signs. billboards, backstops for tennis courts. radio and te levis ion antennas, including supporting
towers and swimming pools.
Stvle . The specific identifying characteristics of a building both as it appears to the eye and as it is known to
exist in design and structure.
Survey. An architectu ral and historical examination of historic resources to identify historic properties within
an area.
(Ord. No.12794. Appendix A, 8-17-98, Ord. No . 15760, § 3. 1-03-18)
Sec. 8-42. Surveys and research.
The City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission (CJHPC), as created by section 7-51 of the City Code,
shall undertake an ongoing survey and research effort in the City of Jefferson to id entify neighborhoods, areas,
sites, structures, and objects that have historic cultural , archaeological, architectural or aesthetic importance,
interest or value as part of the survey, and shall review and evaluate any prior surveys and studies by any unit of
government or private organization and compile appropriate descriptions, facts , and photographs . The CJHPC shall
systematically identify potentiallandmarks,-ilf\G-historic districts. and historic legacy districts and adopt procedures
to nominate them based upon the following criteria:
A. The potentiallandmarks,-ilf\G-historic districts. and historic legacy districts which are in an identifiable
neighborhood or distinct geographical area which have historic and/or cultural importance to the City;
B. The potentiallandmark,-ilf\G-historic districts , and historic legacy districts are associated with a
particular prominent person, a significant event, or ~historical period;
C. The potentiallandmarks,-i!fiG-historic districts, and historic le gacy districts exhibit a particular
architectural style or school, or are associated with a particular architect, engineer, builder, designer,
or craftsman;
D. The potentiallandmarks,-ilf\G-historic districts . and historic legacy districts contain historic, prehistoric,
and archaeological features, evidence, and/or artifacts which have the potential to contribute to the
understanding of historic and prehistoric cultures; or
E. Such other criteria as may be adopted by the CJHPC to assure the systematic survey and nomination of
all potential lanelmarl<s anel histeric landmarks, historic districts , and historic legacy districts within the
City.
(Ord. 13251, 8-20-2001; Ord. 14088, § 2, 8-7-2006)
Sec. 8-48. !lleA'!lRa~ieR ef Historic U egacy D4 istricts.
A. Application/Nomination. Applications fer a neFRinat:on sf ato establish a historic legacy district shall be
made to ~he CJH~g; ~·: :: !:::::: :s ::::::-:::::-:: ::::~ :~~ :·:::-:::-: :7 r::::-:. On f~orms and :rit:r:: f::-noFRi:-:a::on
·::i!! ~2 FAa de avai lab le at the office of the Department of Planning and Protective Services . Applications
must be submitted to the Department: the Department shall forward applications to the CJHPC. Each
historic legacy district must be nominated by a separate application. Ea:h Aisteric I ega:·: :'str:ct FR~st ~2
Created : 2922 ·93 ·14 19:53 :55 (E ST]
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 5 of 14
d::';~:~ed b·; a ses a ra~e are'na~ce . The designation of a historic legacy district shall in no way alter the
uses permitted by #!e-€xisting zoning . land use. or future develo p ment~ of the property so
designated.
B. Notice. Upon receipt of an application ~to estab li sh a historic legacy district. the Department shal l notify
by fi rst class m ail the property owners within the proposed historic legacy district of the application,
arra q e fer a time ana alaee ef a meetina. a of a oubl ic heari ng before the CJHPC~ whe re all
interested persons shall be all owed to appear and be heard. Such notice sha ll be mai led at least fifteen
days c r ier to the pub li c hea r ing.
------{:riteria for ~::r:ina~ion . The CJHPC shall utilize th e foll owing criteria for caFRina~ion :~:!!a a:!·; ~a
a p :!::::z~:::ns for~hc Sesi g :.a ~icn of to establish a histor ic legacy district. T~: c~H~C :~:!!. :~::::-s:.::::h
inv:s~!:::a~:e:-: as i~ SeeFAs necessar'(. make a deterxinatien as ~a v:Rether :n a:-ea :ua~:f:::s fer noFAinatlon
s:..::-s:.:::~t to the ~a!!a":ing cri!eria:
1. Most of all of the physica l attributes (structures. streets. public area s. archeology, etc.) relevant to the
historical or cultural period of significance no longer exist: and at t least one the fo ll owing th ree criteri a:
~Its character. interest. o r value as part of the development. heritage. or cultural
characteristics of the community, county. state. or nation: or
b.b Its location as a site of a significant local, county, state, or national event: or
c.4.--Its identification with a person or persons who significantly contributed to the
development of the community. county. state. or nation.
D. ~Recom m endatio n by CJHPC. After the oub li c hearing. CJ HPC sha ll make vote to make a
recommendation as t o w hether a histroci legacy distr ict hsalll be establi shed and such recommendation
shallb e forwarded to the City Cou nciL', dc:'sio~ b·; CJ!-'"C t: eany a~ aa:l::o~'=~ for A:~:~a~ic~ FRa y be
aa p ea !ed te tRe alaAnin g and :o~in g commission i ~ accer~ance witR th: ac e·<is 'cn s of choa~er 3S of tRe
E.
CaSe s~Jeffe:-saA City Gitv Gounci!.
Ac tion by t he Citv Co un cil. After r ece iPt of a reco m mendation from CJHPC. the Citv Cou ncil may establish
a Hi st oric Legacy District by ordi nance. Each hist oric legacy district must be etablis hed bv a seoarate
ord inance. The City Council may re t urn an apo lication to the CJHPC for further hearings . debate . or
investigation .
·~ Formatted: Space Before: 0 pt After: 0 pt Numbered
+ Leve l: 1 + Numbering Sty le: A, B, C. ... + Start at: 1 +
Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.25" + Ind ent at: 0.5''
•--( Formatted: Indent: Left: 1", Hanging: 0.5''
•--( Formatted: Indent: Left: 1"
·-j Formatted: Ind ent: Left 1", Hanging: 0.5''
•--( Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.5'', No bullets or
___:_~1 Formatted: Underline
F. Effect of Historic Le gacv District on In cluded Properties. The establishment of a Historic Legacv Distr ict ~ Formatted : Indent Left: 0", Hanging: 0.33", Space
sha ll in no way alter t he uses oerm itted bv existing zoning , land use . or future develooment of t he Before: 2 pt After: 6 pt No bullets or numbering
orooert(ies\ so included withi n such district.
G. Expansion of an established historic legacy district. Once a historic legacy district is established by
ordinance under t his section, such historic legacy district may be expanded trruoon application of the
owners of record of parcels seeking to be added to an established his t oric legacy district. Such additional
pa rcels sha ll be within reasonab le oroxi m itv to. and share historical and cultura l characteristics in
com mon with the historic legacy d istrict sught to be expanded . S8ER aeditienal §arce !: shal l be ·.vithin
reasona:!e ::-aJt :mity to. and sha:-e ~:s!:orl~a! a~:! c:..:lt:Jral chara:te:-is!:i:s :n c:::m~en '.'::t~. !:~e :::::!:abl:shcd
histeric le gacv district. WRen an area cen':ai~in;: ten a · FRere ;p rcels seel:s :a se added':: an establisRed
h:::!:o:-1: !c gacv district. tt":c app li:a!::en s~a!! :a:.tai:-: at least ?S perc:::nt o7 a!t :·::~ers ::7 r:::cord sft~e
Created: 2022·03~14 10:53:55 [EST]
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 6 of 14
pa:-:els sce!:i:t g ~:: b: add:d to the estab!:s!-:e:! h:storic !e ::;a:·; dis~:-;:t. Applications to expand a histor ic
district shall be reviewed under the same criteria set forth in subsection C above and under the same
procedures applicable to the original establishment of a historic district. A historic legacy district s!Tall
"*mav only be expanded Hffil!unless acaro;·ed by ordinance .
Created: 2022-03-14 10:53:55 {EST]
(Supp . No . 11)
Page 7 of 14
liec. 8 48. DefiRitieRs.
URiess speeifieally 9efiRe9 wer9s er terms ef til is artiele sllall be iRterprete9 59 as te gi"e ..-~r;:-:-::--.-:----:--:----:-. ------------
til em tile same meaRiR til ... . • · l Formatted: Sect1on .g asey Have IR eemmeR wsage aR9 seas te give tllis artiele .._ ___ _:_:~:::..:...-----------j
1ts mast reaseRable applieatieR.
A9aptive wse Tile preeess ef ella · t'-f :R!liRgHe wse e a strwetwre er preperty te a wse etller tllaR
til at fer wll1ell tile strwetwre er preperty was erigiRally 9esigRe9 era wse fer a
strwetwre er prepert•1• etller tllaR tile wse fer wlliell it was erigiRall" 9esigRe9
(liemetimes ealle9 "a9aptive rewse")
1
"lteratieR "R" aet '-r er pr~eess ~Hat ellaRges eRe er mere ef tile eKterier arelliteetwral featwres
ef a strwetwre1 1Rel~o~91R!li bwt Ret limite9 te1 tile ereetieR eeRstrwetieR
reeeRstrwetieR er remeval ef aR'/Strwetwre.
1 1
. . . . 1 1 IRgs aR strwetwres til at are geRerall·;
19eRtlfle9. a~9 9esenbe9 as beiRg impertaRt pre9wet5 ef llwmaR tllewgllt aR9 aetieR
ellaraetenst1e ef a pepwlatieR er eemm~o~Rit"
Arelliteetwral attribwtes. Tllese pll"sieal featwres ef bw"l9" 9
r•
C:ertifie9 leeal geverRmeRt (c:b<O), A pregram ef tile NatieRal Parlt liePtiee 9esigRe9 te
pr~m.ete tile preservatieR ef prellisterie aR9 llisterie sites1 strwetwres1 ebjeets1
bwii91Rgs aR9 llisterie 9istriets by establislliRg a partRersllip behveeR tile leeal
ge·J~rRmeRti tile litate lolisterie PreseRtatieR DepartmeRt aR9 tile NatieRal Parlt
li~rv1e~, A eertifie9 leeal geverRmeRt earries ewt tile pwrpeses ef tile NatieRal
lol1ster_1e P~eservatieR Aet, as ameR9e9. IOaell eertifie9 leeal ge·1 erRmeRt is reqwire9
te maiRta.IR a system ef eRgeiRg SllF'teys eempatible witll tile Missewri ~isterie
PreseP1at1eR DepartmeRt preeess.
C:JioiPC. Tile C:it'( ef JefferseR lolisterie PreservatieR C:emmissieR.
C:emmissieRers Mem'-f t'-r f .. ers 9He ... 1ty e JefferseR ~isterie PreservatieR C:emmissieR.
C:eRseRt. Tile "ate as east b .. e'"Rers ll 19· · · · -rae IR!l maJenty IRterest iRa pareel ef real estate. Fer
pwrpeses ef tllis artiele1 eRiy eRe •tete per pareel ma•t be east
Created: 2022·03·14 te:Sl: 55 [EST)
(Supp . No. 11)
Page 8 of 14
CeRser\·atieR distrie~, :·R¥ area desigRated b•l the CJI-IPC iR aeeerdaRee •.vith this seetieR as aR
a~ea EORtamiRg aR't' flhysieal feat11res er imf!re•,·emeRts er beth whieh are ef
h1sterieal, seeial, Elllt11ral, arehiteet11ral er aesthetie sigRifieaRee te tl:!e Cit" aRd
h i ea11se SIIE area te eeRstit11te a distiReti"e seetieR ef the Cit" rh · 1 • ,. IS ever ay zeRe ma"
be 11sed fer areas wl:!iehhave distiRetive eharaEteristies that are '"'ertl=l" ef
1
eeRs.ervatie.R, b11t laEI< s11ffieieRt l:!isterieal, arehiteet11ral er e11 1t 11 ;:1 sig:ifieaRee te
'!Yahfy as h1sterie areas.
CeRtriblltiRg lor E~Rtriblltery),/\ sigRifieaRt b11ildiRg, site, str11et11re er ebjeet whieh adds te
tl:!e areh1teEt11ral q11alities, histeriE asseeiatieR er areheelegieal "alye ef aR histe ·
distriet beea11se; FIE
1\ Vh It was f!reseRt d11riRg the f!ertiReRt histerie time·
It· flO~ses_ses iRtegrity aRd refleEts its sigRifieaRt histerie eharaeter er is eaf!able ef
y1eld1Rg lmf!ertaRt, iRfermatieR abe11t the f!ertiReRt histerie f!eried; er
C. It iRdefleRdeRtl·r meets the staRdards aRd eriteria ef this artiele.
Clllt11ral at~ribYtes./\11 ef tl:!e flhysieal feat11res ef aR area that, eitl:!er iRdefleRdeRtl" er b"
''1Ft f th . . I I i : 11e ee1r IRterre atieRshifl, are geRerally ideRtified aRd deseribed as beiRg
lmflerta~t f!redyets ef h11maR the11ght aRd aetieR eharaeteristie ef a flOfllllatieR er
eemmiiRity. 1\eeerdiRgly, the term "e111t11ral attrib11tes" Reeessaril" iRel 11 des
"arehiteet11ral attrib11tes" as that term is defiRed iR this seetieR T~e term "eyltllral
~ttrib11tes" does Ret refer te the eharaeteristies er beliefs ef f!eef!le wl:!e may reside
IR er freq11eRt a f!artie11lar area.
Clllt11ral rese11ree Distr· t "t IE s, s1 es, strlletllres, ebjeets aRd evideRee ef some imf!ertaRee tea
Elll.t~re, a SYbeYit11re er eemmYRity fer seieRtifie, eRgiReeriRg, art, traditieR,
rehg1e11s er ether reaseRs sigRifieaRt iR f!re\•idiRg r ese11rees aRd eR"ireRmeRtal data
ReeessaPt' fer the st11dy aRd iRterf!retatieR ef f!ast lifestyles, aRd fer iRterf!retiRg
h11maR beha•Jier.
eaRRIRg aR PreteetPJe SeP11ees ef the Cit" ef J ff DepartmeRt. The Def!artmeRt f PI · d · ·
Misseyri. I e erseR,
DesigR eriteria.!'. staRdard ef af!f!ref!riate aetivity that will f!reserve the histerie aRd
arel:!iteet11ral el:!araeter ef a str11Et11re er area.
DesigRatieR. Offieial reeegRitieR ef aR histerie laRdmarl<, eeRservatieR er l:!isterie distriet b"
the City Ce11Reil aeeerdiRg te tl:!e f!reeed11res aRd f!revisieRs iR this artiele.
1
Created : 2022-el-14 10:53:55 [EST]
(Supp . No. 11)
Page 9 of 14
Direeter. The.Direeter ef the Department ef Planning and Preteetive Ser\•iees er his er he
des1gnee. ' r
~ndangered resewree 11 d :: '' •. resewree YR er a llnewn er antieipated threat ef damage te tl:!e
II Vh
8.
c.
•ntegnt\' er e111stenee ef the resewree, swel:! as;
II . d" 'oR •mme late tl:!reat whieh will reswlt in less ef er eellapse ef a strwetwre·
II • d" nR lmme late threat er destrwetien lay private aetien; er
Cendemnatien fer eede \'ielatiens.
(Sometimes referred te as a "threatened resewree"),
~Kterier arehit~etwral aF~F~earanee. The arehiteetwral eharaeter and general eamJlesitien ef tl:!e
eK~er~er ef a strwetwre, inelwding lawt net limited te the IliAd, eeler and teKtwre af the
law1ld1Rg material and the tw=>e -' · -' L . .'P ' .. es1gn an .. EHaraeter ef all windews, dears, light
f•Ktwres, s•gns, and appwrtenant elements.
~TI:!e ellterier faee ef a Ia wiiding whieh is the arehiteetwral frent semeti
d " f · h _, L • mes IS IRgYIS e .... y elalaeratien er arehiteetwral er ornamental details.
~isterie distriet. An area designated as an histerie distriet Ia" erdinanee ef the Cit·· Cewn "I d h . h r r e• an
·~ IE may eentain "'ithin definable geagraphie laewndaries ane er mere signifieant
Sites, st~wetwres ar elajeets, and wl:!iel:! may ha\·e within its laewndaries etl:!er
properties er strwetwres that, "'i:li le net ef sweh histerie and'er arehiteet I . ~ r ~~~
slgRHean~e _te lae designated as landmarlls, nevertheless te tl:!e e"erall virtwe
E~araetenstiES af the signifieant sites, strwetwres er elajeets laeated 'Nithin the
hlste.rie distriet. histerieal and ewltwral signifieanee fer whiel:! mast ef all ef the
phvs•_eal a~trilawtes (strwetwres. streets• F!Yialie areas• areheelegieal ete.) relevant te
the h1steneal er ewltwral peried ef signifieanee ne Ienger eKist.
lolisterie preseF"atien The stwd" "d ff t· . .• '' • en IlEa 1en, preteetien, resteratien and rehalailitatien ef
Ia wiidings, strwetwres, elajeets, distriets, areas and sites signifieant in the histeF"
h "t t L j) are I ee wre, arEHeelegy er ewltwre ef the City, State er natian.
~isterieally er arehitee~wrally signifieant. Possessing tl:!at qwality present in an area, site,
strwetwre, elajeet er distriet laeeawse it;
II ... Is asseeiated 'A'ith an event er e •Jents that signifieantl·; eantrilawted te the laread
patterns ef the histery er arehiteetwral heritage ef the Cit" Caw At" State e f 0 TJ F Ra 18Rj
Cr eated: 2e22·el ·l 4 10 :53 :55 (EST]
(S u pp. No. 11)
Page 10 of 14
8. Is ass~eiated with the life or li•Jes of a person or persons signifieant in the histeF" of
the City, Ceynty, ~tate or nation;
1
c. !;msedies distinetive eharaeteristies of a type, design, period or method of
eenstr11etien;
(), Represents the work of a master designer or arehiteet or possesses high
arehiteetYral "aiYej
!;xemplifies the EYitYral, pelitieal, eeenemie, seeial or histerie heritage of the Cit··· ,
c_en~~ins elements of design, detail, material or eraftsmanship 'A'hieh represent a
SigRifieant eenstr11etien innovation;
<;, Is part of or related to a SEjYare, pari< or ether distinetive area that was or sheYid se
=ped or preserved aeeerding to a plan sa sed en an histerie or arehiteet11 ral
Is an estaslished and familiar vis11al feat11re of a neighserhoed or the entire
eommYRity; or
l-Ias yielded, or is lil<ely to yield areheelogieal artifaets and/or information.
Key eentri9Yting. A site, str11et11re or esjeet of s11eh an e 11 tstanding EjYalit•· and state of eonse.rv~tieR that it signifieantly adds to the arehiteet11ral EjYalit~es, histerie
asseeiatiOR or areheelegiealvaiYes of an historie distriet seea 11 se:
1\ Vh
(1,
It was present d11ring the pertinent histerie time;
~t pessesse_s and ref~eets its signifieant histerie eharaeter or is eapasle of yielding
important iRformatiOR aSOIIt the pertiReRt historie period; and
It independent!·; meets the standards and eriteria of the artiele.
landmark. A sit~, strYEtYre or esjeet designated as a landmark sy erdinanee of the City
CeYReil, pyrs11ant to preeed11res preserised herein, that is worthy of rehasilitatien
resterat.ien and preservation seea11se of its historie and/or arehiteet 11 ralsignifiean~e
to the City.
c r e ate d : 1022·03-14 10 :53:55 [EST)
(Supp . No. 11)
Pa ge 11 of 14
landseaae_ fe.atYre./\ny element er eempenent ef eYtdeer epen spaee ineiYding, bYt net
limited te, fenees, walls, retaining walls, gates, sidewalks ..... alkwa"s dri"e .. 'a"s I. I I ' I • w f I
paHI~g~ts, paties, terraees, deeks, greYnd ee>Jer, trees, plants, eytdeer fyrnityre,
extener hgllt standards, feyntains, statyary, detaelled signs, and etller sYell
elements.
beealllisterie distriet./\ llisterie distriet establislled in aeeerdanee witll Cllapter 8 1\ f I I" f
tile Cit'{ Cede, '"r IE e ? e
Marl1er 1\ sign d t 1 '-1 : yseea .. e er identify a designated landmarll er llisterie distriet as an
arelllteetYrall•t signifieant preperty.
Natienal Register.' Tile e~rre~t Natienal Register ef lolisterie Plaees establislled by passage ef
tile Natlenallollstene Preser>Jatien 1\et ef 1999 gg Stat 91§ 19 U S C 47g
amended. ' ' ' ' ' et seE! as
1\ Vh
8.
c
arelllteetyral EjYalities, llisterie asseeiatien er arelleelegieal 'taiYes ef a land I
llisterie distriet beeayse; mar
1
er
It was net present dYring tile pertinent time ·
~Yet~ alteratiens, distyrbanees, additiens er etller ellanges, it ne Ienger pessesses
IRtegnty ner refleets its signifieant llisterie ellaraeter er is ineapable ef "ieldin
. . f . I g
lmpertant IR ermatleR abeYt tile pertinent llisterie peried; er
It dees net independently meet tile standards and eriteria ef tile erdinanee.
Nermal maintenanee and re · o .. · ::"'a1r. • •R 1 1mpre•tement er "Y8rl1 fer 'Niliell a bYilding permit is net
reEjYired by C1ty erdinanee designed te eerreet deterieratien, deeay er damage and
restere as ma" be f 1 . ' r prae 1ea , a strYetYre er preperty te tile eenditien til at e 11 isted
pner te tile deterieratien, deeay er damage
Netable strYetYre. 1\ strYetYre feYnd te be Ratable per tile re¥iew eriteria listed in sYbseetien
~
Cr eated : 2022-03-14 10:53:55 [E ST]
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 12 of 14
~TI'lase Jll'l'(Sieal items tl'lat l'la\'e fYREtiaRal, aestl'le t ie, EYityral1 l'listarieal ar seieRtifie
\'a lYe aREI are relatively small iR seale a REI simJll•· eaRstrYEteEI "'l'lile a b ' Et f • n -~R a~je-ma"
be, ~'t' Ratyre ar ElesigR, ma•;able, it sl'laYIEI be laeateEI iR a SJleeifie settiRg ar
1
~R\'IraRmeRt aJlJlraf!riate ta its sigRifieaRt l'listarie yse, rale ar el'laraeter. Objeets
IREIYEie SEYIJltYres, maRYmeRts, street sigRs, feRee Jlasts, l'litel'liRg Jlasts, mileflaSts
baYREiary marl<ers, stat11ary aREI faYRtaiRs.
1
OwRer(s) af reearEI. Tl'lase iREiiviEIYals, JlartRersl'lif1s 1 firms, earf!aratiaRs, JlYblie ageReies ar
aRy ~tl'ler legal eRtity l'laiEiiRg title ta flraJlerty, b11t Rat iReiYEiiRg legal eRtities
~aiEI1Rg mere easemeRts ar leasel'laiEI iRterests . (May alsa be referreEI ta as
JlraJlerty.awRer(s)"), CYrreRt awRer(s) af reearEI are tl'lase listeEI as a"•Rers aR tl'le
reearEis w1tl'l tl'le Cale CaYRt'( ReearEier af QeeEis.
PeriaEI, A el'lraRalagieal Eli•;isiaR iEieRtifieEI iR tl'le aRal>«sis af tl'le l'list · 1 El 1 . . . 1 anea e•;e af)meRt ta aR
area ar reg1aR (1oe., V1etariaR 1 MaEierR).
PrateetiaR. Tl'le af!fllieati~R af meas11res ta ElefeREI 1 g11arEI 1 eaver ar sl'lieiEI a bYiiEiiRg, site,
str~e~Yre ar abjeEt fram EleteriaratiaR, lass, attaek, ElaRger, ar iRjYry. IR tl'le ease af
BY1IEI1Rgs, str11et11res ar abjeets sYel'l meas11res geRerally are af a Jlrateeti•;e RatYre
aREIYs~ally flreeeEie f!reseP.•atiaR meas11res. IR tl'le ease af arel'lealagieal sites tl'le
f!rateetP.•e meas11res may be temJlarary ar JlermaReRt.
1
ReeaRstrYeti_a~/ree~RstrYet. Tl'le reJlraEIYetiaR af tl'le exaEt farm a REI Eletail af a vaRisl'leEI
~YIIEIIR~, Site, str11Et11re ar abjeEt ar a flart tl'lereaf, as it aJlJleareEI at a JlertiReRt
time YSIRg batl'l arigiRal aREI maEierR materials aREI baseEI aR Jlreeise l'listarieal
ElaeYmeRtatiaR aREI fll'l'(Sieal eviEieRee.
Rel'labilitatiaR/rel'labilitate Tl'le aet af retYrRiRg a site, str11et11re ar abjeet ta a 11 sefyl state
tl'lraYgl'l its r~Jlair aREI/ar alteratiaR wl'lile retaiRiRg tl'le el'laraeteristie feat 11 res af tl'le
f!Faf!erty wl'l1el'l are sigRifieaRt ta its l'listarieal a REI arel'liteet 11 ral va1 11 e,
RemaEieliRg. MaEiifieatiaR aREI El · · f ·. ma erR1zat1aR a a strYetyre ar f)raJ!e r ty witl'la11t stri•;iRg ta
retYrR ta ar reJlheate tl'le arigiRall'listarieal a REI arel'liteet11ral el'laraeter af tl'le
str11et11re ar f!raf)erty,
Remaval "R" rei f f n ,aea laRa a stryetyre iR wl'lale ar iR Jlart aR its site ar ta aRatl'ler site.
~R'( el'laRge ta a strYetyre ar abjeet tl'lat is Rat eaRstrYetiaR, rema\•al ar alteratiaR.
ResaYree. AR'( site, str11Et11re, abjeet ar area tl'lat eaRstitYtes a sa11ree af f!reseRt a REI fytyre
IISefYIReSSo
Created: 2022-03-14 10:53:55 (EST]
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 13 of 14
ResteratieR/restere. Tl=le aet ef aeeYrately reee¥eriRg tl=le farm aRd details eased · . . , OR JlreEISe
~ite
l=l1steneal deeymeRtatieR aRd pl=l"sieal e"ideRee ef a ey"ld" ·t I • , I IRg, 51 e, strYEtYre er
eejeet as it af!peared at a pertiReRt time iReiYdiRg tl=le reme•1 al ef impre"emeRts
tl=lat are Ret appropriate aRd tl=le refllaeemeRt ef missiRg er deteriorated featYres
Tl=le leeatieR ef a sigRifieaRt e¥eRt1 a prel=listerie er l:listerie eeeypatieR er aeti¥it" era
e "ld"
11
:YI IRg er strYetYre, wl=letl=ler staRdiRg, rYiRed er •JaRisl=led, wl=lere tl=le leeatieR
Itself flOSsessesl=listerie, eYitYral er arel=leelegieal ¥alye regardless ef tl=le 'Jalye ef
a.R't' ellistiRg strYetYre. lillamf!les ef sites iReiYde l:laeitatieR sites, I:Jyrial sites, ¥ill age
Slt~s,.I=IYRtiRg aRd fisl=liRg sites, eeremeRial sites, battlefields, rYiRs ef l:listerie
BYIIdiRgs aRd strYGt.Yres, eamf!sites, desigRed laRdseapes, RatYral telltYres, spriRgs
aRd laRdseaflesl=la•JIRg EYitYral sigRifieaRee
~table. Tl=le .area is ~llfleeted te rem aiR sYestaRtially tl=le same e"er tl=le Relit 2Q year peri ad
Wltl=l eeRtiRYed maiRteRaRee ef tl=le Jlreperty. Wl=lile same el=laRges iR strYetyres
laRd yses a d d "f ' .ReRsHes may eeeYr, all syel:l el=laRges are ellf!eeted te be eempatiele
Wltl=l SYFF9YRdiRg de'Jelef!meRt,
~taeiliziRg. Tl=l~ area is.ellpeeted te eeeeme stable e\•er tl=le Relit 2Q year peri ad tl=lreYgl=l
eeRtiRYed reiR'JestmeRt1 maiRteRaRee er remedeliRg.
~taRdards. T~~ ~eeretary ef IRterier's ~taRdards fer tl=le TreatmeRt ef lolisterie Properties,
eed.1f1ed as ~9 cr;R 98 iR tl=le Jyly12, 1993 r;ederal Register (Vel. &Q, Ne. H~h aRd as
re"1sed frem time te time
~tr11etYre. AR'/tl=liRg eeRst r Yetea er ereetea, tl=le yse ef wl=liel=l reEfYires 11 ermaReRt er
temf!er~ry leeatieR OR er iR tl=le greYRd, iReiYdiRg, e11t w itl=leYt limitiRg tl=le
geRerahty ef tl=le f~regeiRg; BYildiRgs, feRee, gazeees, ad\·ertisiRg sigRs, eilleeards,
eael<steflS fer teRRIS eeyrts, radie aRd tele¥isieR aRteRRas, iReiYdiRg SYflflertiRg
towers aRd swimmiRg f!Oels.
~I:! e. s~eeifie iaeRtifyiRg el=laraeteristies ef a eYilaiRg betl=l as it appears te tl=le eye a REI as
It IS I<Re' .... R te ellist iR desigR aRd strYetYre.
~.R arel:liteet11ral aRd l=listerieal ellamiRatieR ef l=listerie reseYrees te ideRtif" l=listerie
f!ref!erties witl=liR aR area.
1
(Ord, Ne, 12794, AflpeRdill A, 8 17 98 1 Ord, Ne 1li79Q, § ~~ 1 g~ 18)
Created: 2022-03-14 10:53:55 [EST]
(Supp . No. 11)
Page 14 of 14
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES
TO:
WROUGH·
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
MEMORANDUM
Public Works and Planning Committee
Sonny Sanders, Director of Planning and Protective Services))))
David Grellner, Environmental Health Manager -:::3).6-·
July 5, 2022
Yard Waste and Compost Site Change in Contract Request
Kris Scheperle, owner of All Seasons Landscaping and Construction Services, and
current contractor for the City of jefferson Yard Waste and Compost Site, has made a
request for an amendment to the current yard waste and compost contract. Mr.
Scheperle is requesting this change for the final year of the contract (Year 5-November
1, 2022-0ctober 31-2023) due to an increase in operation costs such as fuel, labor,
equipment, parts, and materials. Mr. Scheperle is requesting the City of jefferson amend
the Sl" year of the contract to increase the amount charged for drop fees and loading
fees for compost and natural mulch. He also requests an increase in the City of
Jefferson contract payment of5% ($10,000.00). Year 5 of the contract cost to the City of
Jefferson is $201,600.00 .. Current cost to non-residentialusers and commercial operators
for dropping off of yard waste is $10.00 for minimum/leve] pick-up load, $15.00 for
heaped pick up load, and $10.00 per cubic yard for large or commercial vehicles.
Contractor charges $15.00 per cubic yard to customers for loading compost when using
its own equipment. There is no cost to City of Jefferson residential users for dropping
off of yard waste.
· Kris S.cheperle
All Seasons Landscaping and Construction, Inc.
2417 Southr idge Drive
Jefferson City , Mo. 65109
May 31 ,2022
City of Jefferson
Attn : Sonny Sanders
320 E. McCatty Street
Jefferson Ci ty, Mo. 651 01
RE: Yard Waste Recycl ing Center
. Dear Sonny,
RECEIVED
JUN -1 2022
PLAN NING&
PROTECTIVE SERVICES
Thank you and David tor meeting with me on May 24111 regarding the above-
re ferenced matter. As we discussed , the current economic situation has caused an
extreme increase of nearly 10% in the costs of ope ration ofthe Yard Waste
Recycling Center . Some of th e operation costs have more than doubled from just a
year ago. This includes increases in fuel, labor, equipment, parts and materials.
T herefore, in order to defer the enormous in crease in operation costs, we request
the City amend th e 5111 year of our contract on Novem b er 1, 2022 to increase the
amount that we charge for drop fees , and loading fees for compost and natural
mulch . In addition, we request an increase in the Ci ty contract payment of 5%
($1 0,000).
Please do no t hes itate to contact if you need anything regarding this matter. Thank
you very much .
4 •
YARD WASTE DROP-OFF SITE AND COMPOSTING SERVICE
CONTRACT
This agreement made and entered into the date last executed by a party as indicated below,
by and between the City of Jefferson, a municipal corporation, hereinafter "City", and All Seasons
Landscaping and Construction, Inc., hereinafter "Contractor", witnesseth:
That for and in consideration of the mutual promises herein contained, the parties hereby agree
as follows:
1. Scope of Services.
The City agrees to engage the services of the Contractor to perform the services set out in
Response to Proposal No. 2978 and incorporated herein as Exhibit A. The Contractor shall operate a
drop-off site located at 2417 Southridge Drive, Jefferson City, Missouri, and shall be solely
responsible for the operation of said site and the proper disposal of all materials brought to said site.
Exhibit A to this Contract and the letter dated July 20, 2018 from David Grellner and agreed upon by
Contractor, attached to this contract as Exhibit B, are incorporated in full into this contract. To the
extent there is any conflict, the tenns of Exhibit B shall control over Exhibit A and this Contract and
Exhibit A shall control over this Contract.
2. Additional Services.
The City may add to services activities of a similar nature. The Contractor shall undertake such
changed activities only upon the direction of the City. All such directives and changes shall be in written
form and approved by the Director of Planning and Protective Services and shall be accepted and
countersigned by the Contractor or its agreed representatives.
3. Imn..
This contract shall be for the period of one year beginning on November 1, 2018, and
terminating on October 31, 2019, provided that the City shall have the right to cancel at any time upon
giving one hundred twenty {120) days' notice. This contract shall automatically renew for up to four (4)
additional one year periods, subject to annual appropriation by the City Council.
4. Insurance.
Contractor shall procure and maintain at its own expense during the life of this contract:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Workmen's Compensation Insurance for all of its employees to be engaged in work
under this contract.
Contractor's Public Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $3,000,000 for all
claims arising out of a single occurrence and $500,000 for anyone person in a single
accident or occurrence, except for those claims governed by the provisions of the
Missouri Worlanen's Compensation Law, Chapter 287, RSMo., and Contractor's
Property Damage Insurance in an amount not less than $3,000,000 for all claims
arising out of a single accident or occurrence and $500,000 for anyone person in a single
accident or occurrence. The City shall be named as an additional insured.
Automobile Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $3,000,000 for all claims
arising out of a single accident or occurrence and $500.000 for anyone person in a
single accident or occurrence. The City shall be named as an additional insured.
Subcontracts. In case any or all of this work is sublet. the Contractor shall require th~ ~r
Subcontractor to procure and maintain all insurance required in Subparagraphs (a),
(b), and (c) hereof and in like amounts.
(e) Scope of Insurance and Special Hazard. The insurance required under Sub-
paragraphs (b) and (c) hereof shall provide adequate protection for the Contractor and
its subcontractors, respectively, against damage claims which may arise from
operations under this contract, whether such operations be by the insured or by
anyone directly or indirectly employed by it, and also against any special hazards
which may be encountered in the perfonnance of this contract.
NOTE: Paragraph (e) is constnled to require the procurement of Contractor's protective
insurance (or contingent public liability and contingent property damage policies) by a
general contractor whose subcontractor has employees working on the project, unless the
general public liability and property damage policy (or rider attached thereto) of the
general contractor provides adequate protection against claims arising from operations
by anyone directly or indirectly employed by the Contractor.
(f) The Certificates of Insurance furnished to the City showing proof of compliance with
these insurance requirements shall contain a provision that coverage under such
policies shall not be canceled or materially changed until at least fifteen days prior
written notice has been given to the City. Certifies of Insurance must be on file with
the City prior to beginning work.
S. Contractor's Regonsibility for Subcontractors.
It is further agreed that Contractor shall be as fully responsible to the City for the acts and
omissions of its subcontractors, and of persons either directly or indirectly employed by them, as
Contractor is for the acts and omissions of persons it directly employs. Contractor shall cause appropriate
provisions to be inserted in all subcontracts relating to this work, to bind all subcontractors to Contractor
by all the terms herein set forth, insofar as applicable to the work of subcontractors and to give
Contractor the same power regarding tennination of any subcontract as the City may exercise over
Contractor under any provisions of this contract. Nothing contained in this contract shall create any
contractual relations between any subcontractor and the City or between any subcontractors.
6. Termination for Cause.
The City reserves the right to terminate this contract by giving at least five (S) days prior written
notice to the Contractor, without prqudice to any other rights or remedies of the City should the
Contractor be adjudged a banlaupt. or if Contractor should make a general assignment for the benefit of
its creditors, or if a receiver should be appointed for Contractor or for any of its property, or if Contractor
should persistently or repeatedly refuse or fail to supply enough properly skilled workmen or proper
material, or if Contractor should refuse or fail to make prompt payment to any person supplying labor or
materials for the work under the contract, or persistently disregard instructions of the City or fail to
observe or perform any provisions of the contract.
7. Indemnity.
To the fullest extent pennitted by law, the Contractor shall indemnity, defend and hold bannless
the City , its elected and appointed officials, employees, and agents. from and against all claims,
damages. and expenses, including but not limited to attorneys' fees arising out or resulting from the
performance of the Work, provided.that any such claim. damage, loss or expense attributable to bodily
il\iury, sickness, disease or death or to injury to or destruction of tangible property (other than the Work
•
•
ilself) iDcluding !be laos of use resulting tbereliom and is caused in whole or in part by any negUscot od. f{:J Vi'
••
•
or omission of the Contractor, any Subcontractor, anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them
or anyone for those acts any of them may be liable, regardless of whether or not it is caused in part by a
party indemnified hereunder. Such obligation shall not be construed to negate, abridge, or otherwise
reduce any other right or obligation of indemnity which would otherwise exist as to any party or person
described in this pamgraph.
8. Compensation.
The City agrees to pay the Contractor for services rendered under this contract:
1• Year-$192,000.00
21111 Year-$194,400.00
3n1 Year-$196,800.00
4111 Year-$199.200.00
5111 Year-$201,600.00
Payment shall be made on a monthly basis in arrears following submission of an invoice by
Contractor.
9. Charges to Users. Contractor may charge all non-residents oftheCityand COJIII1leroial operators
regardless of their location: ,, Year1 Year2 Year3 Year4 YearS
Minimum and/or Level Pickup $10.00 $10.00 $10.00 $10.00 $10.00
Heaped Pickup $15.00 $15.00 $15.00 $15.00 $15.00
Large or Commercial Vehicles
-per cubic yard $10.00 $10.00 $10.00 $10.00 $10.00
Contractor shall not charge City of Jefferson residential users any fee for use of the compost site.
The City of Jefferson Departments shall be allowed to dispose yard waste without charge.
10. Site.
The site is to be located at 2417 Southridge Drive, Jefferson City, Missouri, which is within
the corporate city limits of the City of Jefferson but south of the Missouri River and appropriately
zoned. Contractorownsthepropertylocatedat2417 Southridge Drive, Jefferson City, Missouri.
11. Waste Guarantee and Acceptable Wyte.
Contractor shall accept organic material including tree limbs and brush 6'' or less in diameter
and smaller cut into four foot lengths, grass clippings. leaves, wood chips, yard and garden vegetation,
flocked and unflocked Christmas trees, and similar material. Contractor shall accept processed materials
from City departments at no additional charge.
12. Unusual Weather Event.
In the event of abnonnal or unusual weather which causes a significant increase in the volume of
material which would go to Contractor pursuant to this contract, the City shall self-impose a moratorium
on the delivery of processed materials by City departments to Contractor for a period of five (S) days
from the event. After the five (5) days have expired, the City may resume its delivery of processed
material at no additional charge to the City.
13. Marketing Compost.
It will be the respons1'bility of the site operator to dispose of the processed material in an
appropriate manner. Part X. Section F of the Contractor's bid proposal indicates uses or markets anticipated
for the compost product Contractor will provide.
14. Davs and Hours of Operation.
The days and haws of operation are as specified in the proposal, but not to be less than the
following:
15. Reports.
Summer (March 16 through November 30)
8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday
8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Saturday
Noon to 5:00p.m. on Sunday
Winter (December 1 through March 1 5)
8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday
Noon to 5:00p.m. Sunday
Volume reports shall be submitted to the City on a monthly basis and are to be received before
payment will be made. The reports shall include the volume of yard waste received and the number of
patrons each month.
16. Performance Bond.
The Contractor must furnish a performance bond in the amount of one hundred percent (lOOOA»)
of the offer. The Contractor must submit the performance bond to the City of Jefferson upon signing this
contract. The performance bond must be issued by a company authorized to do business in Missouri or
secured with a certified check, cash. or cashier's check and made payable to the City of Jefferson in the
amount specified. The ordinance number and dates of performance must be specified in the perfonnance
bond. Personal or company checks are not acceptable. In the event the City of Jefferson exercises its
option to extend this contract for an additional period, the Contractor must maintain the validity and
enforcement of the bond pursuant to the provision of this paragraph for the extended period.
17. Nondiscrimination.
The Contractor agrees in the performance of this contract not to discriminate on the ground or
because of race, creed, color, national origin or ancestry, sex, religion, handicap, age, or political opinion
or affiliation, against any employee of Contractor or applicant for employment and shall include a
similar provision in all subcontracts let or awarded hereunder. The Contractor agrees to comply with all
federal, state, and local nondiscrimination laws and ordinances.
18. Illegal Immigration.
Prior to commencement of the work:
a. Contractor shall, by sworn affidavit and provision of documentation, affirm its enrollment
and participation in a federal work authorization program with respect to the employees working in
connection with the contracted services.
b. Contractor shall sign an affidavit affirming that it does not knowingly employ any person
who is an unauthorized alien in connection with the contracted services.
c. If Contractor is a sole proprietorship, partnership, or limited partnership, Contractor shall
provide proof of citizenship or lawful presence of the owner prior to issuance of the Notice to Proceed.
19. Nonsolicitation.
The Contractor wanants that they have not employed or retained any company or person, other
than a bona fide employee working solely for the Contractor, to solicit or secure this contract, and that
they have not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working pg
~~
•
solely for the Contractor, any fee, commiSSIOn, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts, or any other
consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this contract For breach or
violation of this warranty, the City shall have the right to annul this contract without liability, or, in its
discretion, to deduct from the contract price or consideration, or othenvise recover the full amount of
such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts, or contingent fee.
20. Compliance Wid1 Applicable Law.
The Contractor must agree to comply wid1 all federal, state and local laws or ordinances, and
all applicable rules, regulations, and standards established by an agency of such governmental
units, which are now or hereafter promulgated insofar as they relate to the Contractor's
performance of the provisions of the agreement. It shall be the obligation of the Contractor to apply
for, pay for and obtain all permits and/or licenses required by any governmental agency for the
provision of those services contemplated herein.
21. Cancellation Due to Unavailability of Funds In Succeeding Fiscal Periods.
When funds are not appropriated by the City Council Ol' otherwise made available to
support continuation of performance in a subsequent fiscal period, the contract shall be cancelled.
In the event that funds are not appropriated for the contract, the Contractor shall not prohibit or
otherwise limit the City of Jefferson to pursue and contract for alternate ·solutions as deemed
necessary for the conduct of City affairs.
22. Independent Contractor Status.
In perfonning the services under this agreement, the Contractor will direct the operation in all
respects and will detennine the method, means and manner of performance including, but not limited
to, such matters as choice of any lawful routes, points of service, and time of services. The parties
intend to create by this agreement the relationship of an independent contractor and not an employee-
employer, co-partnership, joint venture, or any other relationship. Neither the Contractor nor any of
their employees, agents, or representatives is to be considered employees of the City insofar as the
subject matter of this agreement is concerned or in perforn1ing services under this agreement.
23. Assignment.
The Contractor shall not assign any interest in this contract, and shall not transfer any interest
in the same (whether by assignment or novation), without prior written consent of the City thereto. Any
such assignment is expressly subject to all rights and remedies of the City under this agreement,
including the right to change or delete activities from the contract or to tenninate the same as
provided herein, and no such assignment shall require the City to give any notice to any such assignee
of any actions which the City may take under this agreement, though City will attempt to so notify
any such assignee.
24. Jurisdiction.
This agreement and every question arising hereunder shall be interpreted according to the laws
and statutes of the State of Missouri.
25. Notices.
All notices required to be in writing may be given by first class mail addressed to the Director of
Planning and Protective Services, City of Jefferson, 320 East McCarty, Jefferson City, Missouri
65101, and All Seasons Landscaping and Construction, Inc., 2417 Southridge Drive, Jefferson City,
Missouri, 65109. The date of delivery of any notice shall be the second full day after the day of its
mailing. }IJ_
~i
CITY OF JEFFERSON
ATTEST:
c~L
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ALL SEASONS LANDSCAPING
AND
CONSTRU
A TTEST_n / _v_ }/.~,~~~
Title:~
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES
MEMORANDUM
.TO: Public Works and Planning Committee
FROM: Sonny Sanders, Director of Planning & Protective Services
DATE: July 8, 2022
RE: Sign Code
A desire to revise the City's sign code has been mentioned at several Council and Committee
meetings.
In August 2010, City Council passed a resolution (RS2010-24) to form an Ad Hoc Sign Review
Committee. The committee of Council and citizens was formed with the understanding that the
issues involved were significant enough to justify the appointment of committee to engage in fact
finding and research. Members included two council members, 3 business association members,
a real estate professional and a member of the Environmental Quality Commission.
More recent changes were initiated by changes to other sections of City Code (addition of MU
districts) or to bring the code into compliance with a Supreme Court ruling (Reed vs. Town of
Gilbert).
City staff is requesting direction on how Council would like to proceed.
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES
MEMORANDUM
Public Works & Planning Committee
Sonny Sanders, Planning & Protective Services Director
Rachel Senzee , Neighborhood Services Supervisor
July 14, 2022
Neighborhood Services' Grants Status Report
Due to the increased amount of federal funding, Neighborhood Services will maintain a
standing agenda item to update Council and the Public. The status report will include
current projects and subgrant information, pending application statuses , and upcoming
funding opportunities . Informational links will also be provided , when available.
The intent of the grant status report is to :
1. Update the Public about funding opportunities
2. Give Council the information necessary to provide their respective constituency
3 . Provide information to support budgetary decisions
Committee Request: None-information only.
For questions or comments, please contact Rachel Senzee at
rsenzee@jeffersoncitymo .gov or 573 -634-6305.
Neighbo r hoo d Se rvi ces Grants Update
Public Works & Plan ning-June 9, 2022
Current Project Sta t us:
Economic Development Administration (EDA)-DR MSP Infrastructure
$3,099,595 Total Project Cos t
Current Time line:
• MSP Redevelopment Coalition: OA, DNR, City, JCREP, CMPS, and developer meet once a
month to coordinate development projects
• Work on the developer's agreement is underway. Anticipated to go before Council in
August/September.
• Memorandum of Agreement with SHPO/EDA-ASAP
o SHPO recommended getting MSP listed on National Register-nomination was
submitted July 7.
o CMPS has prepared a tentative demolition plan
o City staff and the proposed developer are preparing terms of mitigation for the
loss of cultural resources
o Meeting with DNR, SHPO, EDA, and city staff held July 12
• A formal grant amendment, to reflect updated timelines, will be sent Council once EDA
approves
• Design: February-December 2022
• Construction-January 2023-January 2026
EDA CARES-Economic Recovery Plan ~ $30,000-$70,000 (Through RPC}
Current Timeline:
• Complete planning document by December 31, 2022
• Working with JCREP and RPC to create a Broadband Infrastructure Plan. A completed
plan will incentivize broadband providers to build out broadband infrastructure in Cole
County.
• Finley Engineering will be conducting the Broadband Plan
o City will help disseminate surveys and with other outreach components of the
plan
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)-Entitlement Funds-PY2022 $300,250
Current Timeline :
• Spend funds by December 31, 2022
• Projects include:
o Down Payment Assistance (met goal)
o Emergency Home Repair
o Voluntary Demolitions
o Adams/Hickory St . Sidewalk project-contributing ~$313,000
• Impediments for Fair Housing plan is required to be updated every five years.
• Draft Action Plan is open for public comment through July 24
o Council resolution-August 1
o Due to HUD-August 16
CDBG-CARES (CV)-Childcare Facility Grants-$413,435
Current Timeline:
• Funds need to be spent by December 31, 2022
• All funds have been subgranted to 11 childcare facilities for: childcare subsidies,
overhead costs, or small construction projects to prepare, prevent, or respond to
COVID-19
• $82,687 for ad min (staff time and Housing Needs Assessment)
• $330,748 in subgrants
CDBG-Disaster Recovery (DR)-Housing Recovery Activities $7,059,300
• Draft program proposal (Due July 31) includes funding for :
o Planning
o Housing Counseling
o Acquisition/Demo
o New Construction-Single Family Homes
o Multi-Family Construction-New/Rehabi l itation
o Down Payment Assistance
o Homeowner Rehabilitation
o Infrastructure
o Housing Incentive for Replacement
• Due to DED's new updates, staff are working toward an advance call for proposals for
the Multi-Family Construction program
• Once proposals are accepted by the State-OED, next steps are:
o Develop applications and guidelines for each program
o Determine scoring/award process
o Host application workshops
o Award grants before 2023 construction season {goal, not requirement}
Historic Preservation Fund (HPF)
HPF Resurvey Historic East-$23,000 Total Project Cost
• Consultant, David Taylor, is actively working on the project
• Deliverables are due July 2022
HPF lower Jefferson Survey-$23,000 Total Project Cost
• Consultant, David Taylor, is actively working on the project
• Deliverables are due July 2022
HPF Historic Context-$50,000 Total Project Cost
• Consultant, Owen Eastlake, meeting with Historic Preservation Commission,
SHPO, and staff February 8, 2022
• Deliverables are due July 2022
HPF Structural Assessment-$28,000
• Contract for assessments should be on July 18 Council agenda-request to
suspend the rules
• Project would consist of structural assessments for:
o 413 E Capitol
o 419 E Capitol
o 429 E Capitol
o 114 Jackson
o 517 E Capitol
Paul Bruhn Revitalization Grant-$675,000
• Application round is open.
• Next steps include :
o Hosted application workshop-June 23
• 12 attendees
o Applications are due July 31; staff courtesy review is due July 14
o Award grants before 2023 const r uction season (goal, not requi r ement)
• Grant must be completed by September 30, 2024
St at e CDBG -C V Co le County EMS -$2,000,000
• Held the kick-off meeting for the grant
o Currently conducting environmental and preparing accounting flow
• Building an EMS facility on the corner of Adams and E. McCarty
• City is lead applicant
• Staff monitor and provide oversite
• Administration for City staff-$45,000
State CDBG-CV-$689,760
• Funded , waiting on award documents: Compass Health Planning-$100,000
o Market analysis focused on special needs and vulnerable populations
• Funded, award accepted: Transformational Housing-$544,000
o Rehabilitate 101 Jackson into transitional housing
o New roof has been put on (separate from grant funding)
o Currently facilitating environmental review, including Brownfield, and
procurement
• Administration -$45,760 (staff time)
Pendi ng A pp lica t ions:
His t oric Preserva t ion Fund-A pprove d fo r fu nd ing
• Design Guidelines-$50,000
o Guide allows for historic preservation , new development, and redevelopment
• West Main Phase Ill Architectural Survey
Upcoming O ppo rt unities:
RAISE Gra nts -Du e April, 2023
• Funds up to $25 million in infrastructure projects
• 20% match, potentially less depending on project
• Opportu n ity to fund identified projects in :
o Metropolitan Transportation Plan (pg . 102)
Choice Neighborhood Planning Grant -Du e July 2023
• Funds up to $500,000 for a two-year neighborhood Transformation Plan
• Housing Authority is interested in pursuing
• Transformation Plan implementation may be then pursued for up to $50 million
Department of Economic Development-American Rescue Plan Act Programs -Op en July
2022 (t enta t ive )
• Local ARPA funds can be used as match forDED ARPA programs
• Community Rev italization Grant Program -DED closed public comment period July 11.
An t icipates opening up funding August 1-0ctobe r 3
All things Bipartisan Infrastructure Law
• Link above includes timelines and local eligibility requirements