HomeMy Public PortalAbout2022-07-07 packet
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as
required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request.
Please call (573) 634-6410 with questions regarding agenda items.
Technical Committee
Thursday, July 7, 2022 at 10:00 a.m.
Meeting Location: Boone-Bancroft Room, John G. Christy Municipal Building
320 E. McCarty, Jefferson City, MO 65101 - Enter through Main Lobby
THIS MEETING IS AVAILABLE VIRTUALLY
TO JOIN VIRTUALLY:
https://jeffersoncity.webex.com/jeffersoncity/j.php?MTID=m52216b3c2e474c7b8fa9a22888b98fc5
CALL-IN AVAILABLE AT: 1-404-397-1516
MEETING NUMBER: 2496 123 2596 MEETING PASSWORD: 1234
TENTATIVE AGENDA
1. Call to order, roll call, and determination of a quorum
2. Public comment
3. Adoption of the agenda as printed or amended
4. Approval of the minutes from the meeting of April 7, 2022
5. Communications Received
A. Email from Doug Reece, City of St. Martins, supporting CAMPO Safety Action Plan grant application.
B. ONE DOT Approval Letter – CAMPO FY2023 Unified Planning Work Program
C. ONE DOT Approval Letter – CAMPO FY 2023-2027 Transportation Improvement Program and Annual
Self Certification
6. Old Business
7. New Business
A. Illustrative List Priorities
Action Requested: Review, discussion, and recommendation to the Board of Directors.
Staff Report: Staff are requesting a review of the Illustrative list and CAMPO area transportation priorities
in anticipation of upcoming MoDOT unfunded needs discussions.
B. MoDOT Unfunded Needs
Action Requested: Review, discussion, and recommendation to the Board of Directors.
Staff Report: Staff are initiating discussion regarding transportation project priorities to be submitted to
MoDOT in the upcoming Unfunded Needs planning process.
8. Other Business
A. Capital Area Active Transportation Plan
B. Safety Action Plan Grant Opportunity – USDOT Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A)
C. Status of Current Work Tasks
D. Member Updates
9. Next Meeting Date – Thurs., August 4, 2022 at 10:00 a.m. - Boone-Bancroft Room, City of Jefferson City Hall
10. Adjournment
Capital Area Metropolitan
Planning Organization
Room 120 320 E. McCarty, Jefferson City, MO 65101 Phone 573.634.6410 Fax 573.634.6457
MINUTES
TECHNICAL COMMITTEE
CAPITAL AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION
April 7, 2022
VOTING MEMBERS PRESENT
Cole County: Shannon Kliethermes
Matt Prenger
Jefferson City: Sonny Sanders, Chairman
David Bange, Vice Chairman
Eric Barron
Mark Mehmert
Britt Smith
Matt Morasch
MoDOT: Mike Henderson
Steve Engelbrecht
Holts Summit: Mark Tate
Private Transportation: Joe Scheppers
Bike/Ped Interest: Kevin Schwarz
VOTING MEMBERS ABSENT
Paul Stonner, Wardsville
Bob Lynch, MoDOT
Paul Winkelmann, Callaway County
JJ Gates, Jefferson City
EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS ABSENT
Brad McMahon, Federal Highway Administration
Eva Steinman, Federal Transit Administration
STAFF PRESENT (Non-Voting)
Katrina Williams, Planner
Lee Bowden, Planner
Beth Sweeten, Administrative Assistant
GUESTS PRESENT
Jennifer Bowden, Mid-Missouri Regional Planning Commission
Kortney Bliss, City of Jefferson
1. Call to order, roll call, and determination of a quorum
Mr. Sanders called the meeting to order at 10:02 a.m. and asked Ms. Sweeten to call roll. A quorum of 12
voting members or their designee was present.
2. Public comment
None
3. Adoption of the agenda as printed or amended
Mr. Mehmert moved and Mr. Kliethermes seconded to approve the agenda as printed. The motion passed
unanimously.
4. Approval of the minutes from the meeting of March 3, 2022
Mr. Smith moved and Mr. Prenger seconded to approve the minutes from the meeting of March 3, 2022 as
written. The motion passed unanimously.
5. Communications Received
No Communication was received
Minutes/Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Technical Committee
April 7, 2022 Page 2
6. Old Business
A. 2023-2027 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
Mr. Bowden gave a presentation on the TIP. He explained a 25-day public comment period will be opened
by April 20th and closed by the Board of Directors meeting on May 18th, after which the TIP can be
approved. Staff has worked extensively with local jurisdictions, public transportation providers, and
MoDOT to demonstrate fiscal constraint and show projects in the CAMPO region for the next five program
years. All jurisdictions active with CAMPO have consulted with staff to ensure financial details and
projects are correct and appropriate.
Staff recommends motion to forward the Draft 2023-2027 Transportation Improvement Program to the
Board of Directors for review and approval.
Mr. Sanders asked if this dollar amount for the TIP was the highest there has been. Mr. Bowden said it was
the largest since he has been here. Mr. Lynch said there is a preliminary draft online
Mr. Smith moved and Mr. Prenger seconded to forward the Draft 2023-2027 Transportation Improvement
Program to the Board of Directors for review and approval. The motion passes unanimously.
B. FY 2023 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
Ms. Williams gave a presentation on the UPWP. She went over the draft that as provided in the packet.
She stated the estimated draft budget for FY2023 is approximately $292,939 with $234,351 (80%) funded
through the Consolidated Planning Grant (CPG) and $58,588 (20%) funded through local match. The 20%
local match is provided by Jefferson City (75%) and Cole County (25%). Based on the anticipated FY2022
expenditure and estimated FY2023 draft budget, it is projected that CAMPO will have a balance of
approximately $414,627 in unprogrammed CPG funds at the end of FY2023. She pointed out that all of
these totals are subject to change during the development of the UPWP.
She stated A 25-day public comment period will be opened by April 20th and closed by the Board of
Directors at a meeting on May 18th. Staff recommends approving and forwarding the Draft FY2023
Unified Planning Work Program to the Board of Directors for review and approval.
Mr. Morasch expressed interest about using the remaining planning funds be used to start a study on the
expressway and tri-level. Mr. Englebrecht said they would have to look at the proposal. Mr. Morasch stated
he just needs direction on what to do next. He asked that we receive an update from MoDOT at the next
meeting.
Mr. Smith moved and Mr. Prenger seconded to forward the Draft FY2023 Unified Planning Work Program
to the Board of Directors for review and approval. The motion passes unanimously.
7. New Business
No new business
8. Other Business
A. Transit Feasibility Study Update-
Ms. Williams stated the study was completed. Mr. Bange said they interviewed and looked at existing
spaces. They developed a draft based on that information. They decided that the current facility at East
Miller was not big enough. They looked at other options at Hyde Park and Heisinger Road. He stated they
will review the plan and get back to the contractor with some changes. They hope to have that completed
in the next month.
B. Status of Current Work Tasks –
Ms. Williams stated that the following topics had already been touched on earlier in the meeting.
• FY 2023 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) development
• 2023-2027 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) development.
• JEFFTRAN Transit Facility Feasibility Study
• GIS Assistance
Minutes/Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Technical Committee
April 7, 2022 Page 3
• Capital Area Pedestrian & Bicycle Plan
C. Member Updates-
MoDOT
--Mr. Henderson had nothing to announce.
--Mr. Lynch gave an update on bridge formulas and lists, and budget.
--Mr. Englebrecht had nothing to add
Cole County
--Mr. Kliethermes had nothing to add.
--Mr. Prenger gave an update on Tanner Bridge, Woods Crossing subdivision, chip seal bid,
stormwater improvements and asphalt overlay.
Jefferson City
--Mr. Gates was not present.
--Mr. Mehmert gave an update on new busses.
--Mr. Bange provided an update on Grant Street, stormwater on Douglas and Davis and sidewalks
on Dunklin and Adams.
--Mr. Smith gave an update on parking garage study, airport ramp project, airport control tower,
surface contracts, pavement rating, and Amtrak improvements.
--Mr. Barron gave an update on MoDOT scoping projects for major intersections and designee
forms.
--Mr. Sanders had nothing to announce.
--Mr. Morasch gave an update on the viaduct project.
Holt Summit
--Mr. Tate was not present.
Private Interest
-- Mr. Scheppers had nothing to add
Bike/Ped Interest
--Mr. Schwarz had nothing to add
Mr. Bange stated that the Traffic and Safety Commission met this morning and stated they decided to
not no longer support the bike signs in the county.
Mr. Lynch said they have to address homeless encampments in MoDOT Right of Way. In order for
MoDOT to pursue movement, they need to be an imminent threat to structure or safety.
Mr. Barron stated that there has been a new ex-officio spot added to the Technical Committee for the
Heartland Port Authority
8. Next Meeting Date - Thursday, May 5, 2022 at 10:00 a.m. in the Boone/Bancroft Room #200.
9. Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 11:04
Respectfully submitted,
Beth Sweeten, Administrative Assistant
Sanders, Sonny
From: Doug <rdoug48@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2022 4:25 PM
To: Sanders, Sonny
Cc: Williams, Katrina
Subject: SS4A
Hi Sonny,
On behalf of St Martins, I would like to express support for applying for the Safe Streets for All grant. If funded, it would
be great to at least extend the opportunity to participate to Wardsville, Taos, & St Martins.
Thanks for your consideration of this request.
Doug Reece
Small Cities Board Member Rep
Sent from my iPhone
i
June 9, 2022
Mr. Patrick McKenna, Director
Missouri Department of Transportation
P.O. Box 270
Jefferson City, Missouri 65102
RE: FY 2023 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP)
for Capital Area Metropolitan Planning
organization (CAMPO)
Dear Mr. McKenna:
The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
have reviewed the FY 2023 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) for the Jefferson City
metropolitan planning area, that you transmitted to us in your May 20, 2022, letter. CAMPO’s
Board of Directors adopted the FY 2023 UPWP on May 18, 2022. Based on our review, we are
approving the UPWP as an adequate description of activities to support FHWA and FTA funded
technical studies and grant activities. The FY 2023 UPWP period is for November 1, 2022,
through October 31, 2023.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Eva Steinman, FTA,
at (816) 329-3931 or Brad McMahon, FHWA, at (573) 638-2609.
Sincerely,
Mokhtee Ahmad For: Kevin W. Ward, P.E.
Regional Administrator Division Administrator
Federal Transit Administration Federal Highway Administration
cc: Eric Curtit, MoDOT
Mike Henderson, MoDOT
Steve Engelbrecht, MoDOT Central District
Eric Barron, CAMPO
Katrina Williams, CAMPO
Llans Taylor, MoDOT
Dana Kaiser, MoDOT
Christy Evers, moDOT
Federal Transit Administration Federal Highway Administration
901 Locust Street, Room 404 3220 W. Edgewood, Suite H
Kansas City, MO 64106 Jefferson City, MO 65109
816-329-3920 573-636-7104
816-329-3921 (fax)573-636-9283 (fax)
U.S. Department of Transportation
May 23, 2022
Mr. Patrick McKenna, Director
Missouri Department of Transportation
P.O. Box 270
Jefferson City, Missouri 65102
RE: FHWA/FTA Approval of Amendment to the Missouri FY
2022-2026 STIP Amendment to incorporate the Capital Area
Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO) FY 2023-2027
Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and the CAMPO and
MoDOT’s Annual Self Certification
Dear Mr. McKenna:
The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has reviewed the Missouri Department of Transportation’s
(MoDOT) request to incorporate the Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO) FY 2023-2027
Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), as further described in your letter of May 23, 2022, as an amendment
to the FY 2022-2026 Missouri Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). This TIP includes transit,
street, highway, and enhancement projects that are compatible with the metropolitan area’s long-range
transportation plan.
The CAMPO Board of Directors approved the FY 2023-2027 TIP on May 18, 2022. The Missouri Governor
approved the CAMPO TIP on May 20, 2022.
In accordance with 23 CFR 450.218(b), we have determined that this STIP amendment is based on a transportation
planning process that substantially meets the requirements of 23 U.S.C 134 and 135, 49 U.S.C. 5303 and 5304 and
23 CFR 450 Subparts A, B, and C. Based on our review, this STIP amendment request is approved.
The CAMPO’s FY 2023-2027 TIP includes the CAMPO and the MoDOT’s Annual Self-Certification of the
Jefferson City metropolitan planning area transportation planning process as required under 23 CFR 450.334. The
CAMPO Board of Director’s approved the Annual Self-Certification on May 18,2022. Based on our 2018 ONE
DOT Listening Session, the 2015 ONE DOT Planning Process Review and our planning work product reviews and
monitoring activities throughout the year, we concur that the CAMPO’s planning process meets all applicable
Federal requirements outlined in the executed annual self-certification statement.
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Brad McMahon at FHWA (573) 638-2609 or Eva Steinmann at FTA
Region VII (816) 329-3931.
Sincerely,
Mokhtee Ahmad For: Kevin W. Ward, P.E.
Regional Administrator Division Administrator
Federal Transit Administration Federal Highway Administration
Federal Transit Administration Federal Highway Administration
901 Locust, Room 404 3220 W. Edgewood, Suite H
Kansas City, MO 64106 Jefferson City, MO 65109
816-329-3920 573-636-7104
816-329-3921 (fax)573-636-9283 (fax)U.S. Department of Transportation
cc: Eric Curtit, MoDOT
Llans Taylor, MoDOT
Mike Henderson, MoDOT
Steven Engelbrecht, MoDOT Central District
Sonny Sanders, CAMPO
Katrina Williams, CAMPO
Eric Barron, CAMPO
Sharon Monroe, MoDOT
Agenda Item 7A
CAMPO Technical Committee Staff Report
Illustrative Projects List Review
Site Specific Projects
July 7, 2022
Summary
Staff are bringing the Illustrative List Projects forward for review by the Technical Committee
and Board. Staff try to bring the list up for review on a regular basis (preferably annually). The
Illustrative List of Road and Bridge Projects was last reviewed by the Board of Directors at their
January 20, 2021, meeting after review and recommendation by the Technical Committee. The
Multimodal list of projects was last reviewed by the Board of Directors at their July 21, 2021,
meeting after review and recommendation by the Technical Committee.
Illustrative List Contents
1. Programmatic Illustrative Projects – Approved by the Board of Directors and Technical
Committee as broad regional or statewide needs.
2. Illustrative Site Specific Projects –Projects in this list were developed by a stakeholder
workgroup and then reviewed and approved by Technical Committee and Board of
Directors using the Tier system outlined below.
3. JEFFTRAN Program of Projects – An Illustrative list of transit projects that may be
completed in the next 5 to 10 years dependent upon the Jefferson City annual budget and
availability of federal funds.
4. Future Roads –CAMPO Major Thoroughfare Plan
Site Specific Projects
Projects contained in the Site Specific Illustrative List are separated into different “Tiers” based
on the impact or underlying need of the project, as follows: (Projects are not prioritized within
each Tier)
Tier 1 – Regionally Significant projects that are supported by the travel demand model and
recognized as a high priority by the Board of Directors, stakeholders, and the general
public.
Tier 2 – Projects with a more localized area of impact that are (mostly) supported by the travel
demand model and recognized as a high priority by the Board of Directors,
stakeholders, and the general public
Tier 3 – Projects recognized as a need by stakeholders and the general public and may or may
not be supported by the travel demand model.
Site Specific Projects are also classified by type as follows:
System Performance – Typically vehicle oriented Highway/Roadway and intersection projects.
Multi-Modal – Transit, Airport, Rail, and River projects.
Pedestrian and Non-Motorized – Sidewalk, crosswalk, bicycle, and greenway projects.
The following are attached for review by the Techincal Committee:
A. Complete List of Illustrative Projects - excerpt pages 97-104 from the 2045 MTP.
B. Report focused on System Performance (Road and Bridge) Projects, categorized by type
of project (8 categories) and including maps, traffic counts, crashes, and generalized cost
estimates.
Agenda Item 7A
Staff Recommended Changes
Additions:
Addition of Transload Facility (proposed within the Algoa Industrial Park) to the list of
Multimodal Needs.
Staff recommend addition of recommended projects and forwarding to the Board of Directors for review
(along with any other project additions or deletions that are recommended by the Committee).
Recommended Form of Motion:
Motion to forward the Illustrative list, with recommended changes, to the Board of Directors for review.
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN
100
ILLUSTRATIVE PROJECTS
For illustrative purposes, the financial plan includes additional projects that could be completed if
additional resources beyond those identified in the financial plan were to become available.
Some items on these lists have cost estimates or cost ranges associated with them. This section of
the MTP includes:
1. Programmatic Illustrative Projects – Approved by the Board of Directors and Technical
Committee as broad regional or statewide needs.
2. Illustrative Site Specific Projects –Projects in this list were developed by a stakeholder
workgroup and then reviewed and approved by Technical Committee and Board of
Directors using the Tier system outlined below.
3. JEFFTRAN Program of Projects – An Illustrative list of transit projects that may be
completed in the next 5 to 10 years dependent upon the Jefferson City annual budget
and availability of federal funds.
4. Future Roads – Please refer to the CAMPO Major Thoroughfare Plan (Adopted
08/19/2021), located in Appendix J.
Additional illustrative projects can be found in the other adopted CAMPO plans in the
appendices. Most of the illustrative items found in those plans are reflected in the lists below.
Other plans that have identified potential illustrative projects include:
• 2021 CAMPO Major Thoroughfare Plan – Appendix J
• 2016 Capital Area Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan - Appendix F
• 2017 Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan - Appendix G
• 2015 CAMPO Regional Wayfinding Plan - Appendix I
PROGRAMMATIC ILLUSTRATIVE PROJECTS
In addition to the site specific projects listed later in this section, there are other projects that
have been identified as a need in the region that may require a shift in funding allocation at the
state or local level. Figure 6.6 provides a list of programmatic illustrative projects.
Figure 6.6 Programmatic Illustrative Projects
Category Project
Pedestrian & Non-
Motorized
Increase funding to support safety improvements to pedestrian and bicycle
infrastructure at the local level.
System
Performance
Fund the upgrade of US 50 to four lanes to provide an alternative route to
Interstate 70.
System
Performance
Fund expansion and improvements to Interstate 70 including replacement of the
Rocheport bridge over the Missouri River.
System
Performance
Fund expansion of shoulders (min 2’ – 4’) on Missouri numbered and lettered
routes.
System
Performance/
Pedestrian & Non-
Motorized
Create/fund a safety improvement program for small cities with population of
less than 5,000. The program would support small cities making safety
(sidewalks, curb/gutter, crosswalk, signage, etc.) improvements along state
highways that run through their town.
Multi-Modal Transit Capital and Operating Program – maintain and/or increase current level
of service for urban and rural public transportation.
System
Performance
Increase funding for roadway and bridge maintenance to keep infrastructure
good and safe condition.
Agenda Item 7A - Attachment A
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN
101
ILLUSTRATIVE SITE SPECIFIC PROJECTS
This site specific list of illustrative projects were developed by a stakeholder workgroup and then
reviewed and approved by Technical Committee and Board of Directors using the Tier system
outlined below.
Note: The reference numbers used in the following tables and
maps do not denote priority. This number is just a reference
number.
•Regionally Significant: Impacting network users from outside the region and
having major impacts on freight movement moving through the region
•Recognized as a high priority by Board of Directors, stakeholders, and public
•Supported by the 2045 Travel Demand Model
•Supports increased motorized and non-motorized safety and system performance
•Intersections and interchanges with high numbers of crashes
TIER 1
•Recognized as a high priority by Board of Directors, stakeholders, and public
•Most projects in this Tier are supported by the Travel Demand Model
•Supports increased motorized and non-motorized safety and system performance
•Intersections and interchanges with high numbers of crashes
TIER 2
•Designated as a need by stakeholders and general public
•Some projects in this tier are supported by the Travel Demand Model
•Projects in this tier may be completed in phases, dramatically changing cost and
date of completion
•Supports increased motorized and non-motorized safety and system performance
•Intersections and interchanges with high numbers of crashes
TIER 3
Agenda Item 7A - Attachment A
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN
102
Figure 6.7A Illustrative Projects – System Performance
Source: CAMPO
Figure 6.7B Illustrative Projects – System Performance – Tier 1
System Performance - Tier 1
# Jurisdiction Location Project Description Term Cost Range
1 Jefferson City US 54 / 63 / 94
(Bluff Rd)
Construct direct connector for
northbound-to-westbound movement to
improve capacity; widen US 54/63 to
provide 3 continuous through lanes in
each direction (in addition to
auxiliary/acceleration/deceleration lanes)
Long-Term
10 years<
$10M<
2 Jefferson City US 50/63, US 54
to Lafayette St
Implement major capacity improvements,
which could include mainline widening,
grade separations, and/or outer roads
Long-Term
10 years<
$10M<
3 Jefferson City US 50 / 63 /54
(Tri-Level)
Reconfigure interchange to provide non-
conflicting system-to-system movements
Long-Term
10 years<
$5M-$10M
Agenda Item 7A - Attachment A
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN
103
Figure 6.7C Illustrative Projects – System Performance – Tier 2
System Performance - Tier 2
# Jurisdiction Location Project Description Term Cost Range
4 Callaway
County
US 54 / S. Summit
Dr. Ramps
Addition of ramps to westbound and eastbound US 54
completing the S. Summit Dr. overpass
Long-Term
10 years<
$1M-$5M
5 Jefferson
City
US 50 / Dix Rd Reconfigure interchange and Dix Rd approaches to
address capacity issues including lack of left-turn lanes;
consider dumbbell roundabout interchange; widen Dix
Rd to provide center turn lane and pedestrian access
from US 50 to Missouri Blvd
Near-Term
5-10 years
$5M-$10M
6 Jefferson
City
West Edgewood
@ Stadium
Install roundabout to improve intersection capacity Near-Term
5-10 years
$500k-$5M
7 Jefferson
City
Missouri Blvd,
Eastern Lowe's
entrance to S 10
Mile Dr
Address access management along the corridor,
including turn restrictions, additional traffic control,
and safety.
Near-Term
5-10 years
$1M-$10M
8 Jefferson
City
W. Truman Blvd
@ Scott Station
Rd
Signalize or otherwise enhance capacity Near-Term
5-10 years
< $500k
9 Jefferson
City
US-54 NB Ramps
/ Christy Dr /
Stadium /
Jefferson St
Install roundabouts at both hook ramp intersections to
improve operations and address offsets/angles
Near-Term
5-10 years
$1M-$10M
12 Wardsville Route B, Ashbury
Way to Route M
Install roundabout at Rte B / Falcon / Ashbury and
intersection improvements to Rte B / Rte M/ Rte W.
Near-Term
5-10 years
$1M-$5M
13 Jefferson
City
US 54 / Ellis Blvd
/ Southwest Blvd
Reconfigure interchange to address capacity and close
spacing of outer roads. Create pedestrian connection
on Southwest/Ellis Blvd from Ford St to Southridge Dr
Near-Term
5-10 years
$5M-$10M
14 Jefferson
City
Southwest Blvd
@ Stadium
Install roundabout to improve intersection capacity Near-Term
5-10 years
$500k-$5M
15 Jefferson
City
Ellis Bl / Green
Berry Rd
Install roundabout to improve intersection capacity Near-Term
5-10 years
$500k-$5M
16 Jefferson
City
Bald Hill Rd /
Seven Hills Rd
Install roundabout to improve intersection capacity Near-Term
5-10 years
$500k-$5M
17 Jefferson
City
US 50 / Truman
Bl / Country Club
Dr
Reconfigure interchange to address close outer road
spacing; widen westbound off-ramp to improve
capacity; incorporate pedestrian facilities into the
interchange
Near-Term
5-10 years
$5M-$10M
21 Jefferson
City
West Edgewood
@ Creek Trail
Install roundabout to improve intersection capacity Near-Term
5-10 years
$500k-$5M
22 Jefferson
City
Missouri Blvd,
Country Club Dr
to Howerton
Widen to 5 lanes; including right turn lane at Howerton
Ct.
Long-Term
10 years<
$5M-$10M
23 Jefferson
City
Country Club Dr,
Truman Blvd to
Rainbow Dr
Widen to provide left-turn lanes at existing and future
access points
Long-Term
10 years<
$1M-$5M
25 Holts
Summit
US 54 / Route OO
/ Simon Blvd
Reconfigure interchange to address close outer road
spacing and capacity issues (may involve roundabouts);
incorporate pedestrian facilities crossing US 54
Long-Term
10 years<
$5M-$10M
26 Jefferson
City
Missouri Blvd,
Stoneridge Pkwy
to US 50
Improve access management along Missouri Blvd,
including improvements to intersections, restrictions to
turning movements, and improvements to pedestrian
safety.
Long-Term
10 years<
$5M-$10M
Agenda Item 7A - Attachment A
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN
104
Figure 6.7D Illustrative Projects – System Performance – Tier 3
System Performance - Tier 3
# Jurisdiction Location Project Description Term Cost Range
29 Jefferson
City
Madison Street,
Dunklin St to
US-54 Ramps
Add a center turn lane via a combination of
widening and parking removal; address
unusual stop control configuration at Madison
Atchison
Near-Term
5-10 years
$1M-$5M
30 Jefferson
City
US 50/63 / Clark
Ave
Reconfigure interchange to address ramp
terminal capacity (likely roundabouts); include
modifications to Clark/Miller and Clark/Dunklin
intersections to improve corridor operations
Near-Term
5-10 years
$1M-$10M
31 Holts
Summit
US 54 / Center St Improve interchange capacity and east-side
outer road spacing with roundabouts at
terminals
Long-Term
10 years<
$1M-$10M
32 Cole County Rock Ridge Rd /
Wildwood Dr
extension
Add left-turn lane on Rock Ridge to improve
capacity after completion of extension
Long-Term
10 years<
$1M-$5M
33 Jefferson
City
MO 179, Industrial
Dr to Sue Dr
Add left-turn lanes at Sue Dr, Cherry Creek Ct,
and Fire Station north driveway
Long-Term
10 years<
$500k-$5M
34 Jefferson
City
MO 179 and
Truman Blvd
Reconfigure intersection with roundabout Long-Term
10 years<
$1M-$5M
35 Cole County Bridge Replacement
/ Tanner Bridge Rd
Bridge Replacement on Tanner Bridge Rd. over
Moreau River
Near-Term
5-10 years
$1M-$5M
36 Wardsville Route B, Tanner
Bridge Rd to
Friendship Rd
Install roundabouts at two locations to improve
capacity: Rte B / Falcon / Ashbury, Rte B / Rte
M; widen to four lanes in each direction on Rte
B for several hundred feet south of Tanner
Bridge Rd and reconfigure intersection; Widen
Rte B to provide TWLT
Near-Term
5-10 years
$5M-$10M
39 Jefferson
City
Swifts Hwy /
Jefferson St
Reconfigure to fix sight distance issues; widen
Swifts Hwy approach
Long-Term
10 years<
$50K-$100k
40 Holts
Summit
S. Summit Dr /
Perrey Dr / Hibernia
Ln / Holt Ln
Redesign intersection to address offset and
sight distance
Near-Term
5-10 years
N/A
41 Holts
Summit
Spalding Rd/ Park Install drainage improvements. Curb and
gutter could cause surface flooding for
adjoining properties.
Near-Term
5-10 years
N/A
42 Holts
Summit
N. Summit Dr and
Mars St Intersection
Install drainage improvements -box culvert. Near-Term
5-10 years
N/A
43 Holts
Summit
Van Horn Rd / Julie
Ln
Redesign intersection to address offset and
sight distance
Near-Term
5-10 years
N/A
47 St. Martins Route T/D & Bus 50
W Intersection
Reconfigure intersection with roundabout Near-Term
5-10 years
$500k-$1M
48 Holts
Summit
Nieman Rd / Halifax
Rd / Major Terr
Address offset and skew by installing
roundabout or realigning east leg
Near-Term
5-10 years
N/A
49 Holts
Summit
E Simon Blvd Replace undersized culvert. Install new bridge
~0.4 mi east of Jefferson Rd
Near-Term
5-10 years
N/A
57 Taos Routes M and Y
shoulders
Install minimum 2 ft. shoulders along state
routes M and Y in Taos
Near-Term
5-10 years
$500k-$1M
60 Jefferson
City
High St. viaduct
rehabilitation
Rehabilitation of the High St. viaduct over
Missouri Blvd.
Long-Term
10 years<
$5M-$10M
Agenda Item 7A - Attachment A
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN
105
Figure 6.8A Illustrative Projects – Multi-Modal
Source: CAMPO
Agenda Item 7A - Attachment A
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN
106
Figure 6.8B Illustrative Projects – Multi-Modal – Tier 2
Multi-Modal - Tier 2
# Jurisdiction Location Project Description Term Cost Range
18 Jefferson City JEFFTRAN Transit
Facilities
Construction of a new facilities for
JEFFTRAN that would provide better
accommodations for transit riders and
staff, including, but not limited to; a bus
barn, washing bays, central maintenance
facilities, and administrative offices
Near-Term
5-10 years
$5M-$10M
19 Jefferson City Jefferson City
Amtrak Station
Renovation or replacement of the Amtrak
Train Station in Jefferson City
Long-Term
10 years<
<$100M
20 Jefferson City/
Cole County/
Callaway County
Missouri River Port Construction of a port facility in either
Callaway County or Cole County as
specified in the Central Missouri
Multimodal Port Feasibility Study.
Near-Term
5-10 years
$10M<
27 Jefferson City Jefferson City
Memorial Airport
Reconstruction of Runway 9/27 Near-Term
5-10 years
$1M-$5M
28 Jefferson City Jefferson City
Memorial Airport
Construction of new air traffic control
tower.
Near-Term
5-10 years
$1M-$5M
61 Jefferson City Jefferson City
Memorial Airport
Rehabilitate Facility Housing ARFF/SRE
Equipment
Near-Term
5-10 years
$500k-$1M
62 Jefferson City Jefferson City
Memorial Airport
Reconstruction of Taxiway A. Near-Term
5-10 years
$5M-$10M
Figure 6.8C Illustrative Projects – Multi-Modal – Tier 3
Multi-Modal - Tier 3
# Jurisdiction Location Project Description Term Cost Range
37 Jefferson City Jefferson City
Memorial Airport -
Runway 9 and 9/27
Relocate Runway 9 and Extend Runway
9/27 at the Jefferson City Memorial Airport.
Long-
Term 10
years<
$5M-$10M
38 Jefferson City Jefferson City
Memorial Airport -
Runway 12/30
Extension and Widening of runway 12/30
at the Jefferson City Memorial Airport.
Long-
Term 10
years<
$10M<
Agenda Item 7A - Attachment A
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN
107
Figure 6.9A Illustrative Projects – Pedestrian and Non-Motorized
Source: CAMPO
Agenda Item 7A - Attachment A
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN
108
Figure 6.9B Illustrative Projects – Pedestrian & Non-Motorized – Tier 2
Pedestrian & Non-Motorized - Tier 2
# Jurisdiction Location Project Description Term Cost Range
10 Holts Summit S. Summit Drive,
Simon to Center
Install sidewalks with some curb and gutter
and drop inlets
Long-
Term 10
years<
$500K-$1M
11 Jefferson City Missouri Blvd, W.
Main St. to
Stadium Blvd.
Complete connectivity between segments
of sidewalk and install
crosswalks/pedestrian refuges as needed.
Near-
Term 5-
10 years
$1M-$5M
Figure 6.9C Illustrative Projects – Pedestrian & Non-Motorized – Tier 3
Pedestrian & Non-Motorized - Tier 3
# Jurisdiction Location Project Description Term Cost Range
24 Jefferson
City
Bolivar St. Greenway Design and construct a greenway
extension from the Dunklin St. Trailhead
to McCarty St.
Near-Term
5-10 years
$500k-$1M
44 Jefferson
City
Southwest Blvd & Dix
Rd Intersection
Install pedestrian-activated beacon or
similar warning device
Near-Term
5-10 years
< $50K
45 Jefferson
City
Dix Road, W. Main to
Missouri Blvd
Improve bicycle and pedestrian facilities
along the corridor
Near-Term
5-10 years
< $500k
46 St. Martins/
Cole County
Route T, Bus 50 to
Elston
Install shoulders to accommodate cyclists
and pedestrians.
Near-Term
5-10 years
$5M-$10M
50 Holts
Summit
Karen Dr, Center to
Thompson
Install sidewalk and crosswalks Near-Term
5-10 years
$500K-$1M
51 Holts
Summit
Halifax Rd, Center to
Nieman
Install sidewalk and crosswalks Near-Term
5-10 years
$500K-$1M
52 St. Martins/
Cole County
Route T, Henwick Ln
to Bus 50 W
Install curb, gutter & sidewalk in each
direction
Near-Term
5-10 years
N/A
53 CAMPO Bike lane installation
in CAMPO Region
Continue expansion of bike lanes in the
downtown area.
Near-Term
5-10 years
$50K-$100k
54 CAMPO CAMPO Greenway
Connectivity
Continue to expand greenways to connect
cities in the CAMPO Region
Long-Term
10 years<
$10M<
55 Jefferson
City
Jefferson City
Greenway Projects
Locations may include; Fairgrounds Acres
to County Park, South Country Club Drive
to Turtle Creek subdivision, Ellis-Porter
Riverside Park connector from St. Louis
Road, Wears Creek to East Branch
Connector, Frog Hollow Phase 4, Creek
Trail to W. Edgewood
Near-Term
5-10 years
$50k-$1M
56 Jefferson
City
Missouri Blvd and S.
Ten Mile, Stoneridge
Pkwy to S. Country
Club
Install Sidewalks and crosswalks along
route with pedestrian accesss over MO
179 provided via a pedestrian bridge
connecting S. Ten Mile east and west
segments.
Near-Term
5-10 years
$1M-$5M
58 Taos Sidewalk expansion Extend sidewalk along Route M north and
south of existing sidewalk.
Near-Term
5-10 years
$1M-$5M
59 Taos Trail Connectivity Create sidewalk/trail connection between
Route M sidewalk and Countryside Park
trail.
Near-Term
5-10 years
< $500k
Agenda Item 7A - Attachment A
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN
109
JEFFTRAN PROGRAM OF PROJECTS
Figure 6.10 outlines an Illustrative list of transit projects that may be completed in the next 5 to
10 years dependent upon the Jefferson City annual budget and availability of federal funds.
Figure 6.10 Program Projects
JEFFTRAN Program of Projects
Description Total Cost
Other
Funding
Local
Funding
1 Replace paratransit wide body cutaway buses $150,000 $120,000 $30,000
2 Replace paratransit software and associated
hardware
$30,000 $24,000 $6,000
3 Replace low-floor minivan support vehicle $40,000 $0 $40,000
4 Replace transit administration vehicle $30,000 $30,000
5 Upgrade/replace fare card system $300,000 $240,000 $60,000
6 Repair Transfer Facility Roof (Bus Transfer Shelter) $12,000 $0 $12,000
7 Transit facility improvements--ridge cap/flashing
replacements/roof repair on bus barn
$50,000 $40,000 $10,000
8 Security upgrades for transit facilities $30,000 $24,000 $6,000
9 Replace outdated bus security camera systems $60,000 $48,000 $12,000
10 Update/revise Transit facilities feasibility study $150,000 $0 $150,000
11 Purchase and install bus shelters at various
locations in Jefferson City
$30,000 $24,000 $6,000
12 Transit facility improvements, including replace
overhead doors and door operators
$95,000 $76,000 $19,000
13 JEFFTRAN lighted signs for exterior of transit
facilities
$15,000 $12,000 $3,000
14 Purchase emergency back-up generator &
switches for transit and CM facilities
$100,000 $80,000 $20,000
15 Replace low-floor route buses $3,000,000 $2,400,000 $600,000
16 Construct new transit facilities and central
maintenance facilities
$7,000,000 $5,600,000 $1,400,000
17 Transit admin facility rehab $50,000 $40,000 $10,000
18 Purchase and install additional transit traveler
kiosks (each)
$15,000 $12,000 $3,000
19 Add bike racks at passenger transfer facilities
and selected bus stops
$5,000 $0 $5,000
20 Enhance/replace security systems for buses and
transit facilities
$20,000 $16,000 $4,000
21 Charging systems/electrical upgrades for buses $100,000 $80,000 $20,000
22 Add crosswalks to various locations around the city $60,000 $0 $60,000
23 Rehabilitate/replace bus wash facility $100,000 $80,000 $20,000
Source: JEFFTRAN March 2019
FUTURE ROADS
Please refer to the CAMPO Major Thoroughfare Plan, located in Appendix J.
Agenda Item 7A - Attachment A
Major
Thoroughfare
Plan
Appendix J
CAMPO 2045 & Beyond Metropolitan
Transportation Plan
Adopted August 18, 2021
The preparation of this report was financed in part by the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, and Federal Transit Administration in
cooperation with the Missouri Department of Transportation. The opinions, findings, and
conclusions expressed in this report are not necessarily those of the Federal Highway
Administration, Federal Transit Administration, or the Missouri Department of Transportation.
Agenda Item 7A - Attachment A
Note: Updates to the Metropolitan Transportation Plan and Major
Thoroughfare Plan can be found on our website at
www.jeffersoncitymo.gov/campo
Produced by the Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization
Consultant services for the development of the Travel Demand Model provided by HDR, Inc. and City Explained, Inc.
MPO Administration is provided by the City of Jefferson
Department of Planning and Protective Services/ Planning Division
Room 120 John G. Christy Municipal Building
320 East McCarty Jefferson City, Missouri
Telephone 573-634-6410
http://www.jeffersoncitymo.gov/campo/
Agenda Item 7A - Attachment A
WHAT IS THE MAJOR THOROUGHFARE PLAN?
The CAMPO Major Thoroughfare Plan is a component (Appendix J) of the CAMPO 2045 & Beyond Metropolitan
Transportation Plan (MTP). The Major Thoroughfare Plan was developed after the 2019 completion of the MTP
and the 2021 completion of Active Jefferson City 2040, the City of Jefferson’s Comprehensive Plan.
Recommendations from an updated 2019 Travel Demand Model (TDM), MTP, Comprehensive Plan, and additional
stakeholder input was used to produce the Major Thoroughfare Plan.
The Major Thoroughfare Plan details expansions of existing major roads, proposed federal functional classification
upgrades, and delineates future major roads that are necessary to accommodate the anticipated 20-year growth
projections of the CAMPO Planning Area.
The goals of the Major Thoroughfare Plan are as follows:
•Provide for the efficient movement of vehicular traffic into and throughout the Region.
•Consider right-of-way needs to accommodate a proposed thoroughfare.
•Ensure adequate roadways to serve existing and proposed developments.
•Assist in identifying Capital Improvement Program needs.
•Reduce the traffic volumes in residential areas by ensuring adequate arterials.
•Serve as a planning tool and assist coordination with other agencies.
The Major Thoroughfare Plan is composed of two elements:
1)Federal Functional Class Map - a map showing the current Federal Functional Classification for all CAMPO
roads. (Figure 2)
2)Major Thoroughfare Plan Map - a map and list showing major upgrades to existing roads and general
locations of future roads and connections. (Figure 3)
Generally, the Major Thoroughfare Plan Map excludes minor collector and local street projects. The Major
Thoroughfare plan includes system performance projects (Tier 1 and 2) as identified in the CAMPO 2045 &
Beyond MTP Illustrative List of Projects. The Plan does not contain all projects listed in the MTP Illustrative List of
Projects.
The Plan does not include detailed traffic studies, crash data, or other condition statistics as those are available in
the CAMPO TDM, CAMPO MTP, or in studies conducted by individual jurisdictions.
Amendments and Modifications
The CAMPO Major Thoroughfare Plan is a component (Appendix J) of the CAMPO 2045 & Beyond MTPand may
be changed through an amendment or administrative modification as described in in Section 3 of the MTP.
CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND MTP AND 2019 TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL (TDM)
In 2019 CAMPO adopted an updated MTP that included an updated TDM. The MTP and TDM utilized the several
local planning documents along with multi-modal plans such as the Holts Summit 2014 Pedestrian, Bicycle, and
Transit Plan, 2017 Capital Area Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan, and the 2021 Coordinated Public Transit - Human
Services Transportation Plan.
The TDM resulted in a list of recommended improvements that were based on stakeholder needs, current land use,
future land use projections, and population and housing projections. The TDM was used to support the MTP’s
Implementation Plan and Illustrative List of Projects. The Illustrative List of Projects outlined in the MTP directly
supports the development of the CAMPO Major Thoroughfare Plan.
CAMPO Major Thoroughfare Plan 1
Agenda Item 7A - Attachment A
FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION
Functional classification, governed by federal guidelines, is the process by which roads, streets and highways are
grouped into classes according to the character of service they are intended to provide. It defines the role that
any particular road or street should play in serving the flow of trips through a highway network. Functional
classification progresses from a lower classification handling short, local trips to a higher classification as the trips
become longer and connect regional and inter-regional traffic generators.
Functional classifications are periodically reviewed by MoDOT and local representatives, but are usually updated
every ten years, coinciding with decennial U.S. Census revisions of urban boundaries. The Functional classification
changes are submitted to FHWA for review and approval. The Major Thoroughfare Plan provides support for
federal functional classification changes. The CAMPO functional classification system was last reviewed and revised
in early 2013.
Functional classification is used in transportation planning, roadway design and determining the funding eligibility
of transportation projects. Private roads are not included in the CAMPO functional classification network nor are
interstate highways, tribal lands roadways, or federal lands roadways.
Functionally classed roadways in the CAMPO network include US highways, state highways, county roads, and
some municipal roads/streets. These roadways are divided into urban and rural, and are further classified as
local, collector, or arterial as seen in Figure 1.
Figure 1 Federal System for Functional Classifications
Source: FHWA Functional Classification Guidelines
FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAY PROGRAM
The Federal-Aid Highway Program supports State highway systems by providing financial assistance for the
construction, maintenance, and operations of the Nation's 3.9 million-mile highway network, including Interstates,
primary highways and secondary local roads. FHWA is charged with implementing the Federal-Aid Highway
Program in cooperation with the States and local governments. Nationally, local governments own and operate
about 75 percent of the Nation's highway network. The Program applies to all “functionally classed” roads, with
the exception of Minor Collectors or Local.
CAMPO Major Thoroughfare Plan 2
Agenda Item 7A - Attachment A
£¡50
£¡54
£¡63
£¡63
£¡50
¹
¬¬179
¬¬94
""C
Missouri River
Taos
O sageR iverC o le C o u n tyCallawayCounty
Wardsville
£¡63
£¡54
""J
""M
""B
""B
""E ""W
""T
""D
""D
""OO
""AA
""BB
Jefferson CitySt. Martins
HoltsSummit
City Limits
MPO Boundary
Federal Functional Classification
0 3 61.5 Miles
Freeway/ExpresswayPrinicipal ArterialMinor ArterialMajor CollectorMinor CollectorLocal CallawayCountyBooneCountyCAMPO Federal Functional Classification System
Figure 2
CAMPO Major Thoroughfare Plan 3
Agenda Item 7A - Attachment A
£¡50
£¡54
£¡63
£¡63
£¡50
¹
¬¬179
MissouriRiver
Taos
Cole County
Callaway County
Wardsville
£¡54
""M
""B
""W
""T
Jefferson CitySt. Martins
0 1 2 3 40.5 Miles
!14
!3
!4
!5
!8
!18
!1
!19
!16
!17
!15
!2
!6
!7
Schotthill Woods Drive Extension
Bald Hill Rd. (Eastland Dr. to Roling Rd.)Safety improvements: shoulder widening, horizontal and vertical alignment improvements,
right-of-way clearing for better sight distance, and improved signing.
FFFC: Minor CollectorTanner Bridge Rd. (Route B to Friendship Rd.)
Rainbow Dr. (Paradigm Dr. to Binder Lake Rd.)
Henwick Ln. (Rainbow Dr. to Gary Ln.)
Scott Station Rd. (city limits to Willowbrook Dr.)
Construction of a curb and gutter, stormwater improvements, and new pavement.
FFFC: Major Collector
US 50/63 Rex Whitton Expressway
US 50/54/63 Tri-Level
US 63/54 north of the Missouri River Bridge
Mission Drive extension to Rock Ridge Road
Wildwood Drive extension (Phase 2)
Wildwood Drive extension (Phase 1)
Militia Drive extension
S. Summit Drive ramp additions
Stoneridge Parkway extension
Upgrades to Existing Roads
Future Roads
Project Description
Reconfiguration of Tri-Level interchange to provide non-conflicting system-to-system movements.
Capacity and traffic control improvements between US 54 and Lafayette St. Creation of a third
eastbound and westbound lane, between the Missouri River Bridge and the divergence of US 63/54.
The project would likely include a re-configuration of Route W overpass. FFFC: Freeway/Expressway
FFFC - Future Federal Functional Classification are based on a 20 year planning horizon.
!9
!20
Improve capacity, reconfigure intersections, widening. FFFC: Minor ArterialRoute B (Tanner Bridge Rd. to Route W)
Connection between MO 179 and proposed Wildwood Dr. extension. Project identified in the 2019
Travel Demand Model. This project would likely occur in phases. FFFC: Collector
Southern extension from W. Edgewood Drive to Rock Ridge Road (Phase 1) and then extension to
Route C (Phase 2) FFFC: Collector
Southern extension of Militia Drive from US 63 to Liberty Road. FFFC: Collector
Construction of east bound and west bound ramps connecting US 54 to S. Summit Drive in Callaway
County. The ramps would complete the existing overpass. FFFC: Freeway/Expressway
Southern extension from the roundabout to W. Edgewood Dr., including four lanes with intermittent
landscaped medians and center turn lanes, similar to the existing northern portion. FFFC: Collector
Eastern extension from its current terminous to Schott Road. FFFC: Collector
CAMPO Major Thoroughfare Plan
!1!2
!3
!4 !5
!6
!7
!8
!9
!14!15
!20
!16
Area Enlarged
Figure 3
!10 !11 !12
!17
!18
!19
!11
!10
!12
Missouri Blvd. (S. Country Club to Howerton Ct.)
Missouri Blvd. Corridor Improvements
Monroe Street Widening
Widen to 5 lanes with right-turn lane at Howerton Ct. FFFC: Principal Arterial
Address access management including turn restrictions, traffic controls, safety. Possible addition of
turning lanes at S. Ten Mile Dr. FFFC: Principal Arterial
!13
!13 Widening of Monroe St. from Woodlawn to E. Atchison St. FFFC: Collector
CAMPO Major Thoroughfare Plan 4
Agenda Item 7A - Attachment A
Page 0
Illustrative Projects List Review
This report is designed to take a more focused look at the Illustrative Projects – System Performance list. This list is
broken down into the following categories.
1.Regionally Significant (Tier 1) Projects
2.Highway Interchange Projects
3.Missouri Boulevard Projects
4.Intersection Arterial Projects
5.Intersection Collector Projects
6.Street Widening / Turn Lane Projects
7.Other / Misc. Projects
8.Future Roads
Agenda Item 7A - Attachment B
Page 1
Regionally Significant (Tier 1) Projects
Num Tier City / County Location Project Est. Cost Traffic Counts Crashes
1 1 Jefferson City US 54 / 63 / 94
(Bluff Rd)
Construct direct connector for northbound-to-
westbound movement to improve capacity; widen US
54/63 to provide 3 continuous through lanes in each
direction (in addition to auxiliary/accel/decel lanes)
$10M<54100 352
2 1 Jefferson City US 50/63, US 54 to
Lafayette St
Implement major capacity improvements, which
could include mainline widening, grade separations,
and/or outer roads
$10M<41350 572
3 1 Jefferson City US 50 / 63 /54 (Tri-
Level)
Reconfigure interchange to provide non-conflicting
system-to-system movements
$5M-
$10M
79968 234
Agenda Item 7A - Attachment B
Page 2
Highway Interchange Projects
Num Tier City / County Location Project Est. Cost Traffic Counts Crashes
4 2 Callaway
County
US 54 / S. Summit
Dr. Ramps
Addition of ramps to westbound and eastbound US 54
completing the S. Summit Dr. overpass
$1M-$5M 28451 31
5 2 Jefferson City US 50 / Dix Rd Reconfigure interchange and Dix Rd approaches to address
capacity issues including lack of left-turn lanes; consider
dumbbell roundabout interchange; widen Dix Rd to provide
center turn lane and pedestrian access from US 50 to
Missouri Blvd
$5M-
$10M
35714 116
9 2 Jefferson City US-54 NB Ramps /
Christy Dr / Stadium
/ Jefferson St
Install roundabous at both hook ramp intersections to
improve operations and address offsets/angles
$1M-
$10M
15212 53
13 2 Jefferson City US 54 / Ellis Bl /
Southwest Bl
Reconfigure interchange to address capacity and close
spacing of outer roads. Create a pedestrian connection
along Southwest Bl / Ellis Bl from Ford St to Southridge Dr
$5M-
$10M
19448 222
17 2 Jefferson City US 50 / Truman Bl /
Country Club Dr
Reconfigure interchange to address close outer road
spacing; widen westbound off-ramp to improve capacity;
incorporate pedestrian facilities into the interchange
$5M-
$10M
19576 160
25 2 Holts Summit US 54 / Route OO /
Simon Bl
Reconfigure interchange to address close outer road
spacing and capacity issues (may involve roundabouts);
incorporate pedestrian facilities crossing US 54
$5M-
$10M
7652 45
30 3 Jefferson City US 50/63 / Clark Ave Reconfigure interchange to address ramp terminal capacity
(likely roundabouts); include modifications to Clark/Miller
and Clark/Dunklin intersections to improve corridor
operations
$1M-
$10M
9692 57
31 3 Holts Summit US 54 / Center St Improve interchange capacity and east-side outer road
spacing with roundabouts at terminals
$1M-
$10M
3636 28
Agenda Item 7A - Attachment B
Page 3
Missouri Boulevard Projects
Num Tier City / County Location Project Est. Cost Traffic Counts Crashes
7 2 Jefferson City Missouri Blvd,
Eastern Lowe's
entrance to S 10
Mile Dr
Address access management along the corridor,
including turn restrictions, additional traffic control,
and safety.
$1M-
$10M
22620 85
22 2 Jefferson City Missouri Blvd,
Country Club Dr to
Howerton Ct
Widen to 5 lanes; including right turn lane at
Howerton Ct.
$5M-
$10M
9669 26
26 2 Jefferson City Missouri Blvd,
Stoneridge Pkwy to
US 50
Impove access management along Missouri Bld,
including improvments to intersections, restrictions
to turning movements. and improvemnts to
pedestrian safety
$5M-
$10M
22193 927
Agenda Item 7A - Attachment B
Page 4
Intersection -Arterial Projects
Num Tier City / County Location Project Est. Cost Traffic Counts Crashes
6 2 Jefferson City West Edgewood @
Stadium
Install roundabout to improve intersection capacity $500k-
$5M
5680 18
8 2 Jefferson City W. Truman Blvd /
Scott Station Rd
Signalize or otherwise enhance capacity < $500k 8553 5
14 2 Jefferson City Southwest Blvd @
Stadium
Install roundabout to improve intersection capacity $500k-
$5M
10707 24
15 2 Jefferson City Ellis Bl / Green
Berry Rd
Install roundabout to improve intersection capacity $500k-
$5M
8128 7
16 2 Jefferson City Bald Hill Rd / Seven
Hills Rd
Install roundabout to improve intersection capacity $500k-
$5M
3359 2
21 2 Jefferson City West Edgewood @
Creek Trail
Install roundabout to improve intersection capacity $500k-
$5M
4866 12
34 3 Jefferson City MO 179 and Truman
Blvd
Reconfigure intersection with roundabout $1M-$5M 9570 76
39 3 Jefferson City Swifts Hwy /
Jefferson St
Reconfigure to fix sight distance issues; widen
Swifts Hwy approach
$50K-
$100k
7126 5
40 3 Holts Summit S. Summit Dr /
Perrey Dr / Hibernia
Ln / Holt Ln
Redesign intersection to address offset and sight
distance
N/A 3472 1
47 3 St. Martins Route T/D & Bus 50
W Intersection
Reconfigure intersection with roundabout $500k-
$1M
8456 5
Agenda Item 7A - Attachment B
Page 5
Intersection -Collector
Num Tier City / County Location Project Est. Cost Traffic Counts Crashes
12 2 Wardsville Route B, Ashbury
Way to Route M
Install roundabout at Rte B / Falcon / Ashbury and
intersection improvment to Rte B / Rte M/ Rte W.
$1M-$5M 5456 34
36 3 Wardsville Route B, Tanner
Bridge Rd to
Friendship Rd
Install roundabouts at two locations to improve
capacity: Rte B / Falcon / Ashbury, Rte B / Rte M;
widen to four lanes in each direction on Rte B for
several hundred feet south of Tanner Bridge Rd and
reconfigure intersection; Widen Rte B to provide
TWLTL
$5M-
$10M
5818 42
43 3 Holts Summit Van Horn Rd /
Julie Ln
Redesign intersection to address offset and sight
distance
N/A 2494 0
48 3 Holts Summit Nieman Rd /
Halifax Rd / Major
Terr
Address offset and skew by installing roundabout or
realigning east leg
N/A 2150 2
Agenda Item 7A - Attachment B
Page 6
Street Widening / Turn Lanes
Num Tier City / County Location Project Est. Cost Traffic Counts Crashes
23 2 Jefferson City Country Club Dr,
Truman Bl to
Rainbow Dr
Widen to provide left-turn lanes at existing and future
access points
$1M-$5M 6790 95
29 3 Jefferson City Madison Street,
Dunklin St to
US-54 Ramps
Add a center turn lane via a combination of widening
and parking removal; address unusual stop control
configuration at Madison Atchison
$1M-$5M 10572 60
33 3 Jefferson City MO 179, Industrial
Dr to Sue Dr
Add left-turn lanes at Sue Dr, Cherry Creek Ct, and
Fire Station north driveway
$500k-
$5M
4943 50
36 3 Wardsville Route B, Tanner
Bridge Rd to
Friendship Rd
Install roundabouts at two locations to improve
capacity: Rte B / Falcon / Ashbury, Rte B / Rte M;
widen to four lanes in each direction on Rte B for
several hundred feet south of Tanner Bridge Rd and
reconfigure intersection; Widen Rte B to provide
TWLTL
$5M-
$10M
5818 42
57 3 Taos Routes M and Y
shoulders
Install minimum 2 ft. shoulders along state routes
throughout Taos
Install minimum 2 ft. shoulders along state routes M
and Y in Taos
$500K-
$1M
1432 33
Agenda Item 7A - Attachment B
Page 7
Other / Misc. Projects
Num Tier City / County Location Project Est. Cost Traffic Counts Crashes
32 3 Cole County Rock Ridge Rd /
Wildwood Dr
extension
Add left-turn lane on Rock Ridge to improve capacity
after completion of extension
$1M-$5M 2166 3
35 3 Cole County Bridge
Replacement /
Tanner Bridge Rd
Bridge Replacement on Tanner Bridge Rd. over
Moreau River
$1M-$5M 4011 2
41 3 Holts Summit Spalding Rd/ Park Install drainage improvements. Curb and gutter
could cause surface flooding for adjoining properties.
N/A 2
42 3 Holts Summit N. Summit Dr and
Mars St
Intersection
Install drainage improvements – box culvert. N/A 8280 5
49 3 Holts Summit E Simon Blvd, ~0.4
mi east of
Jefferson Rd
Replace undersized culvert. Install new bridge N/A 3576 3
60 3 Jefferson City High St. viaduct
replacement
Replace High St. viaduct over Missouri Blvd.$5M-
$10M
5730 1
Agenda Item 7A - Attachment B
Page 8
Future Roads
Num Location
1 Wildwood Extension to Rock Ridge Road
2 Mission Drive Extension to Rock Ridge Road
3 Schotthill Woods Drive Extension to Schott Road
4 Missouri State Penitentiary Parkway
5 Mission Drive to Stadium Boulevard Connection
6 Stonerider Parkway extension to W. Edgewood Drive
7 S. Summit Drive Ramp Additions
8 Militia Drive Extension to Liberty Road
Agenda Item 7A - Attachment B
Agenda Item 7B
CAMPO Technical Committee Staff Report
Unfunded Needs Review
July 7, 2022
Summary
MoDOT is anticipated to begin their yearly review and reestablishment of High Priority Unfunded
Needs this summer. CAMPO Staff are requesting a review of the 2021 submittals for unfunded
needs and guidance from the Technical Committee and Board of Directors on the 2022 process.
MoDOT High Priority Unfunded Needs
Purpose
The purpose of the unfunded needs exercise is to identify and prioritize known transportation needs
as a preliminary part of a larger process of “scoping” projects and incorporating them into the
Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP).
Guidance
MoDOT has not yet issued guidance to their Planning Partners on the upcoming round of
Unfunded Needs Discussion. Guidance was issued last year, and included funding targets for each
of the three tiers and multimodal categories separated by MoDOT District. It is anticipa ted by
CAMPO staff that the guidance issued to MoDOT Districts and Planning Partners will be similar
to last years guidelines.
See attached Attachment A - 2021 Unfunded Needs Project Prioritization Guidelines.
Funding Targets
In 2021, MoDOT districts were given maximum dollar amounts for project lists within each Tier.
Central District had 2021 financial targets of:
Tier 1 – $56 Million
Tier 2 – $225 Million
Tier 3 – $225 Million
Multimodal – $112 Million
Tiers
The unfunded needs are divided into “tiers” based on a combination of priority and ability to
deliver the project within a general timeframe.
Tier 1 – Urgent Needs, projects must be deliverable within the timeline of the current STIP
Tier 2 – Remaining needs, projects should be deliverable within 10 years.
Tier 3 – Remaining needs, deliverable in future years.
Placement of projects within the tiered list is ultimately a function of MoDOT, with
recommendations from the MoDOT districts being sent to MoDOT Central Office, where the lis t
is finalized, and ultimately presented to and adopted by the Missouri Highway and Transportation
Commission.
Agenda Item 7B
Existing (Jan 2022) Unfunded Needs List
An unfunded needs list was initially published in Fall of 2021. This list only included Tier 1 and
Tier 2 Road and Bridge Projects. Tier 3 and Multimodal projects were added to the document, via
a second round of unfunded needs discussions, and published in January of 2022.
The full statewide unfunded needs document is available online at:
https://www.modot.org/unfundedneeds
An excerpt of the document showing projects within each Tier for the Central District is
provided in Attachment B.
An overview list of projects from the CAMPO area is attached as Attachment C.
CAMPO Unfunded Needs Project Submittals
CAMPO submitted a list of Road and Bridge Projects (in two batches) and a list of Multimodal
Projects to MoDOT as part of the unfunded needs planning process.
Initial Road/Bridge Project Submittal
- Corridor Improvements at the Missouri River Bridge on Callaway County side.
- Rex Whitton Expressway Improvements
- Highway 54/Simon Boulevard interchange in Holts Summit
- Highway 54 and Southwest/Ellis Blvd Interchange
- Highway 50 and Truman Blvd/Country Club Drive Interchange
- Tri-level Interchange and approaches to the Missouri River Bridge
Follow-up (Tier 3) Road/Bridge Project Submittal
- Tri-level Interchange and approaches to the Missouri River Bridge
- Highway 50 and Dix Road Interchange
- Missouri Boulevard Corridor Study
- Hwy 50/63 and Clark Avenue Interchange
- Route B Corridor-Ashbury Way/Friendship Rd.
Projects discussed but not submitted by CAMPO
- Highway 54 and South Summit Drive Interchange
- Highway 54 ramps at Jefferson/Christy
- Highway 54 and Center Street Interchange
Multimodal Project Submittal
- Airport - Air Traffic Control Tower
- JEFFTRAN – Transit Facilities
- Amtrack Station
- Port Facility
- Airport – Runway 12/30
- Airport – ARFF/SRE Facility (firefighting/snow removal)
- Airport – Runway 9/27
- Sidewalk – Missouri Boulevard Sidewalks
- Sidewalk – South Summit Drive Sidewalks
- Greenway – Jefferson City Greenway Extensions
Agenda Item 7B
Staff Proposed Unfunded Needs Submittal to MoDOT
Staff propose to submit the same list of projects to MoDOT for 2023 Unfunded Needs
consideration, with the removal of any projects that have been funded or placed in the STIP and
the addition of one multimodal project as follows:
- Removal of Corridor Improvements at the Missouri River Bridge on Callaway County side.
(project funded within 2023-2027 STIP)
- Removal of Highway 54/Simon Boulevard interchange in Holts Summit
(project funded within 2023-2027 STIP)
- Addition of Transload Facility (rail transfer) at Algoa Industrial Park.
(pending addition to CAMPO Illustrative list)
Projects from the “discussed but not submitted” list would fill out any vacant slots, resulting in the
following prioritized project list.
Road and Bridge Projects:
1. Rex Whitton Expressway Improvements
2. Highway 54 and Southwest/Ellis Blvd Interchange
3. Highway 50 and Truman Blvd/Country Club Drive Interchange
4. Tri-level Interchange and approaches to the Missouri River Bridge
5. Highway 50 and Dix Road Interchange
6. Missouri Boulevard Corridor Study
7. Hwy 50/63 and Clark Avenue Interchange
8. Route B Corridor-Ashbury Way/Friendship Rd.
9. Highway 54 and South Summit Drive Interchange
10. Highway 54 ramps at Jefferson/Christy
11. Highway 54 and Center Street Interchange
Multimodal Projects:
1. Airport - Air Traffic Control Tower
2. JEFFTRAN – Transit Facilities
3. Amtrack Station
4. Port Facility
5. Airport – Runway 12/30
6. Airport – ARFF/SRE Facility (firefighting/snow removal)
7. Airport – Runway 9/27
8. Sidewalk – Missouri Boulevard Sidewalks
9. Sidewalk – South Summit Drive Sidewalks
10. Greenway – Jefferson City Greenway Extensions
11. Transload Facility at Algoa Industrial Park
Staff Recommendation
Staff is bringing this project list forward to the Technical Committee for review and comment.
Staff requests forwarding the list, with any additions, deletions, or commentary, to the Board of
Directors for final review. Tabling the discussion for additional review and consideration until the
August meeting may also be appropriate.
Recommended Form of Motion:
Motion to forward the proposed unfunded needs project submittal list to the Board of Directors
for review.
2021 Unfunded Needs Project Prioritization Guidelines
With the expansion of the unfunded needs list to include the addition of a third tier and a
multimodal listing, Districts will need to work with Planning Partners now through September to
validate the existing project listing (tiers 1 and 2) and to develop a the additional needs listings for
tier 3 and multimodal. Each district will identify projects totaling their portion of future funding in
the amount of $2 billion for Tier 3 road and bridge projects and $1 billion in Multimodal projects.
The goal of the unfunded needs list is to be able to react quickly with deliverable projects to any
identified or secured funding and to provide a list of projects which represent where additional
funding could be used.
Road and Bridge: The $4.5 billion of needs for road and bridges will be categorized as follows:
1.Tier 1 ‐ $500 million urgent needs
a.Projects must be deliverable (awarded) with in the timeline of the current STIP.
2.Tier 2 ‐ $2 billion of remaining needs
a.Projects should be deliverable in any of the next 10 years, 2023‐2032.
3.Tier 3 ‐ $2 billion of remaining needs
a.Remaining needs deliverable in future years
Multimodal: The $1 billion future funding for Multimodal will be categorized as follows:
1.Projects may include all modes of Multimodal transportation.
2.The identified needs can address infrastructure improvements, operation assistance and
capital maintenance.
General Guidance:
Due to the need to have projects that can be located easily (as might be required to show
projects within congressional districts) projects are required to be landed in TMS, and as
such Various/Various for route and county cannot be used.
Additionally, each project location must be landed under separate entries. Grouped routes
of similar treatments must be separated into individual entries with specific costs and
location data.
Estimates should be in today’s dollars. During each review cycle, costs can be reviewed and
revised if necessary.
Agenda Item 7B - Attachment A
Once formally published, needs are not deleted. When a project is no longer a regional
priority and removed from the list or if a need is formally committed in the STIP, specific
fields in the Unfunded Needs List TMS application are updated to reflect the disposition.
Only erroneous TMS entries incorrectly identifying an added need which occurred during the
unfunded needs development should be deleted.
o When a need is formally added to the STIP
Added to STIP is updated to Yes
STIP Cycle Added is updated to reflect the STIP Cycle in which the project was
added
Job Number is updated to reflect the project Job Number added to the STIP
o When a project which was previously a need is delivered
Delivered is updated to Yes
Year Delivered is updated to the award year
o When a project is no longer regionally supported and is removed from the list
Removed by Dist. Without Adding to STIP is updated to Yes.
While reviewing the existing unfunded needs the following fields should not be significantly
changed without discussion with CO TP (Minor adjustments which tweak a project location
or clarify the anticipated work are acceptable)
o Description
o Location (TW ID, Route, Begin Log, End Log or County Name)
Potential Future Funds (millions)
Region Road and Bridge Multimodal
District Distribution1 $500 Million
Tier 1
$2 Billion
Tier 2
$2 Billion
Tier 3 Total $1 Billion
NW 4.64% $23.22 $92.89 $92.89 $208.99 $46.44
NE 4.68% $23.39 $93.56 $93.56 $210.52 $46.78
KCR 2.80% $14.02 $56.09 $56.09 $126.20 $28.04
KCU 18.37% $91.85 $367.38 $367.38 $826.61 $183.69
CD 11.27% $56.34 $225.38 $225.38 $507.10 $112.69
SL 34.58% $172.90 $691.61 $691.61 $1,556.12 $345.80
SWR 9.56% $47.81 $191.26 $191.26 $430.33 $95.63
SWU 5.30% $26.49 $105.97 $105.97 $238.43 $52.98
SE 8.79% $43.97 $175.87 $175.87 $395.70 $87.93
Total Dist. 100% $500 $2,000 $2,000 $4,500 $1,000
1 Distributed based upon the MHTC’s FY23 system improvements funding formula.
Timeline: The due date for the high priority unfunded projects to SharePoint is September 30th .
List submittal: A TMS application has been built to manage the unfunded needs list. A separate
document is provided which offers guidance on using the application and required data needs.
Agenda Item 7B - Attachment A
Agenda Item 7B - Attachment B
Agenda Item 7B - Attachment B
Tier 1 – Central District Project Locations
Tier 2 – Central District Project Locations
Tier 3 – Central District Project Locations
Agenda Item 7B - Attachment B
March 2022 - Missouri Unfunded Needs List Update – Presented to CAMPO
Technical Committee
Summary
MoDOT has finalized the 2022 High-Priority Unfunded Needs document, which the CAMPO Board, Technical
Committee, and staff were heavily involved in. The finalized document is available on the MoDOT website at:
https://www.modot.org/sites/default/files/documents/2022-01%20FINAL%20High-
Priority%20Unfunded%20Needs.pdf
Staff are providing this update of projects contained within the current MoDOT STIP and the Unfunded Needs list
for the purpose of discussion. MoDOT intends to update the unfunded needs list on an annual basis and plans to
begin that process this summer.
2022-2026 STIP
Improvements to Missouri River Bridge approaches on Callaway County side.
Budgeted at $4.2 million
Planned Award in 2024
Interchange Improvements at Simon Boulevard and Route OO
Budgeted at $4.6 million
Planned Award in 2023
Unfunded Needs List (Road and Bridge Needs)
Tier 1
No project in CAMPO area
Tier 2
Hwy 54/Ellis Boulevard/Southwest Boulevard Interchange
Estimated Funding Needed: $24 million
Current Status: Scoping Project underway by MoDOT consultant
Hwy 50/Truman Boulevard/Country Club Drive Interchange
Estimated Funding Needed: $11.8 Million
Current Status: Scoping Project underway by MoDOT consultant
Rex Whitten Expressway Improvements
Estimated Funding Needed: $47 million
Current Status: EIS document completed
Tier 3
Dix Road/Hwy 50 Intersection Improvements
Estimated Funding Needed: $8 million
Missouri Boulevard Traffic Study (Corridor Study)
Estimated Funding Needed: $250,000
Tri-level Interchange Improvements (Cole County Missouri River Bridge approaches)
Estimated Funding Needed: $40 million
Missouri Boulevard Improvements at South Ten Mile Drive
Estimated Funding Needed: $980,000
Agenda Item 7B - Attachment C
Unfunded Needs List (Multimodal Needs)
Airport
Construct New Air Traffic Control Tower
Estimated Funding Needed: $4.7 million
Runway and Taxiway Improvements for Runway 12/30
Estimated Funding Needed: $16.4 million
Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting Building
Estimated Funding Needed: $1.75 million
Transit
Bus Facility Replacement
Estimated Funding Needed: $9 million
Rail
Replace or Rebuild Amtrak Station
Estimated Funding Needed: $15 million
Port
Property Acquisition for North and South Port Sites
Estimated Funding Needed: $73,000
Design for Infrastructure at South Side Port
Estimated Funding Needed: $98,000
Extend Utility Services into South Side Port
Estimated Funding Needed: $99,000
Bridge and Road Infrastructure into South Side Port
Estimated Funding Needed: $8.75 million
Pedestrian
Sidewalks on Missouri Boulevard
Estimated Funding Needed: $3 million
Sidewalks on South Summit Drive in Holts Summit
Estimated Funding Needed: $1.2 million
Agenda Item 7B - Attachment C
Agenda Item 8A
CAMPO Technical Committee Staff Report
Capital Area Active Transportation Plan
July 7, 2022
Summary
Staff, along with consultants Crafton Tull and LaneShift, have kicked-off the planning process for the Capital
Area Active Transportation Plan. This process will update and incorporate the Capital Area Pedestrian &
Bicycle Plan (2016), Jefferson City’s Sidewalk Plan (2010) and Greenway Master Plan (2007), and the Holts
Summit Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Transit Plan (2014).
The Capital Area Active Transportation Plan covers all CAMPO communities and take place over the next 12
to 15 months. The plan will generally include the following:
• comprehensive set of strategies to ensure better options for biking, walking, and transit
• recommendations for prioritizing infrastructure improvements
• outline recommendations for new policies, processes, and infrastructure
• base recommendations on a robust public and stakeholder involvement campaign
A detailed scope of services and timeline is attached.
Funding for this project totals $125,000 and is provided via the CAMPO Consolidated Planning Grant
($100,000), with match provided by JC Parks ($25,000).
__________________________________________________________________________________________
www.craftontull.com 1
Exhibit “A”
Scope of Basic Services For:
Project: CAMPO Active Transportation Plan
Client: Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization
Location of Project: City of Jefferson, MO
Discipline: Planning
Discipline Manager: Julie Luther Kelso
Project Manager: Julie Luther Kelso
Proposal Date: 03/23/22
Billing Type: Fixed Fee
Fee/Estimate: $125,000
Description of the Planning Project: Active Transportation Planning Services
TASK 1: PROJECT KICK-OFF, EXISTING FACILTIES, VISIONING, AND ONGOING COORDINATION
At the outset of the project, Crafton Tull (Consultant) will work with the Capital Area Metropolitan Planning
Organization (Client) to refine the overall project strategy and initiate coordination with past or ongoing studies
and projects in the study area.
Task 1.1 Virtual Kick-off Meeting and Project Management
The CTA Team will begin the project with a virtual kick-off meeting with the Client to confirm the objectives for
the project. As necessary, the kick-off meeting will address the following key project issues:
1. Provide a forum for meeting participants to identify opportunities and challenges that this project
will face, and to establish the objectives that must be accomplished through this work.
2. Discuss the project schedule, including the key milestones, deliverables and meetings.
3. Discuss the availability of GIS and/or other base data and plan documents that will be needed for
the project.
It is understood that CAMPO staff will subsequently meet with individual jurisdictions to present the project
process and timeline.
Task 1.2 Ongoing Project Coordination
Throughout the project, Crafton Tull will coordinate progress, decision points, and next steps with the client or
client team. Monthly project update meetings will be held to discuss these and any project issues as they arise.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
www.craftontull.com 2
Task 1.3 Public Engagement Plan
Crafton Tull will outline a public engagement plan based on this scope of services that specifies workshop
agendas, focus groups, and outreach efforts that may be completed by the consultant team or client throughout
the planning process.
Task 1.4 Previous Plans Review and Assessment
The CTA Team will review all previous plans relevant to this study and assess major themes, identify areas of
consensus and areas of contradiction, and compile a summary document to be utilized during the visioning
process with the steering committee and the public to confirm which components have been achieved, which
ones carry forward with continued relevance, and which ones no longer apply. This assessment will determine
the framework of the consolidated Active Transportation Plan. The Crafton Tull Team will conduct a virtual
meeting with the client to review the assessment and key outcomes of existing plans.
Task 1.5 Collect Existing GIS Data and Develop Base Maps
To conduct the analyses described in this scope, the Consultant will need a wide variety of GIS and base data,
including street attribute data, built and natural environment components, planning and parcel data, and
analytical and planning outputs from previous planning efforts.
The following GIS data is requested to conduct the project:
• Roadway centerline files with road name, classification, posted speed limit, ADT, number of travel
lanes, lane widths and overall roadway width, direction (one-way vs. two way)
• Existing bicycle and pedestrian traffic counts
• Locations and descriptions of planned transportation infrastructure improvements
• Existing and planned trails and greenways, sidewalks, and on- and off-road bicycle facilities
• Right of way extents
• Bicycle and pedestrian crash data over the past 5 years
• Travel Demand Model and Scenario Planning Outputs
• Analysis data previously completed for this project
• Locations of signalized intersections
• Transit routes and stops
• Contours
• Locations of physical barriers such as sidewalk disconnects, major highways, rail lines, rivers and
streams, steep terrain, and other barriers
• On-street parking restrictions
• Parcel layers indicating public or private land ownership
• Major employment and activity centers
• Locations of major bicycle and pedestrian destinations (including schools, colleges, libraries, parks
and open spaces, senior centers, social service sites, community centers, sporting venues, tourist
destinations, hospitals, and other activity centers)
• Locations of planned residential or commercial development
• Land use (current and proposed)
__________________________________________________________________________________________
www.craftontull.com 3
• Zoning
• Population, employment, and travel data (by census block group and traffic analysis zone)
• Aerial photography of the study area
Under guidance of the Client, Crafton Tull will use data provided by Client and request additional data through
contact with planning, transportation, park and/or public data management.
Task 1.6 Existing Facilities and Existing Conditions Analysis
Using the base data obtained in Task 1.5, Crafton Tull will develop or revise a map of existing on- and off-road
bicycle (not including unpaved trails) and pedestrian facilities across the study area (to the extent data is
available). The map will show locations and types of facilities, and will include supplementary information such
as locations of parks, schools, transit routes and other key generators of bicycling and walking trips.
Road suitability analysis maps as well as trip generator analysis maps will also be produced, which assist in the
determination of future network recommendations.
Task 1.7 Sidewalk Inventory
CAMPO staff will provide an inventory of existing sidewalks within the study area, including locations of
continuous existing sidewalks in good or suitable condition, locations of deteriorating sidewalks or major
sidewalk gaps, and completeness of the sidewalk on one or both sides of the street as generalized on a per-block
basis.
Task 1.8 WORKSHOP 1: Envisioning the Future
The Crafton Tull Team will conduct a three-day workshop with the steering committee, stakeholders, and the
public to confirm previous public engagement outcomes as well as identify new goals and strategies that will be
carried forward through the CAMPO Active Transportation Plan. The Crafton Tull Team will be responsible for
developing meeting materials, handouts and presentations. The Client will be responsible for arranging the
meeting venue and logistics, as well as distributing meeting notifications.
• Client and Consultant Site Tour
The Crafton Tull Team will participate in a half day site tour with CAMPO staff to visit key locations
within the study area. These may include recent infrastructure projects, areas of concern, key
destinations within the community, major connectivity barriers, and/or areas of high pedestrian or
bicycle use. CAMPO staff will be responsible for organizing this overview.
• Steering Committee Meeting 1: Vision & Goals
The Crafton Tull Team will conduct a visioning session with the Project Steering Committee to define the
overall vision and goals for bicycling and walking in the CAMPO region, including existing and desired
routes for active transportation and important destinations within the community. During this
discussion, the Steering Committee will help the Consultant understand the City’s transportation policy,
land use policy, development patterns, existing programs and other factors that will contribute to a high
quality bicycle and pedestrian environment in the community. Crafton Tull will develop the draft vision
and goals statement based on this discussion.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
www.craftontull.com 4
• Stakeholder Group Meetings
The Crafton Tull Team will conduct four stakeholder groups over a period of one morning and one
afternoon to discuss opportunities and barriers to walking and cycling, efforts to build a culture of
walking and bicycling, existing efforts underway that affect the active transportation network, and
desired outcomes of the project as well as the network. It is anticipated that these groups will include:
• Healthcare
• Education
• Public Safety
• Chamber/CVB and Business Owners
• Bicycle/Pedestrian Advocates
• Elected Officials & Government Staff
• Public Meeting 1
The first Public Meeting will be used to gather insight from the general public and interested
stakeholders. The meeting will have the following objectives:
• Provide an overview to the benefits of providing a culture for active transportation
• Provide input into the vision/goals for walkability, bikeability, and trails in the community, including
those identified in previous planning efforts
• Solicit input on issues and concerns regarding pedestrian access, bicycle connectivity, and safety
throughout the City
• Offer an opportunity for participants to document bicycle and pedestrian issues they are aware of in
their community or routes they currently travel or would like to travel
• Discuss important current and future destinations in the community
Task 1 Deliverables:
• Kick-off meeting materials
• Draft Vision and Goals for the project
• Existing Facilities map(s)
• Public Meeting 1 maps, graphics, presentation, and outcomes
TASK 2: PRELIMINARY NETWORK, CONDITIONS ASSESSMENT, AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This task includes an assessment of existing infrastructure, as well as plan to establish a baseline for active
transportation across the study area considering both on-street facilities, sidewalks, and paved trails.
Task 2.1 Develop Study Network
Crafton Tull will define a preliminary network for field assessment based upon the analysis and input received in
Task 1. The Consultant will identify critical gaps in the community bicycle and pedestrian network. This analysis
will include:
__________________________________________________________________________________________
www.craftontull.com 5
• locations where bike and pedestrian facilities end prior to key destinations, or do not sufficiently
connect to other facilities (such as trail entrances)
• relevant locations in the study area that are not currently served by the pedestrian and bicycle network,
• existing pedestrian and bicycle locations where a significant safety issue exists,
• major barriers to bicycle and pedestrian travel, such as wide arterial streets, rail lines, water bodies, etc.
Task 2.2 Assess Study Network
Crafton Tull will evaluate the route network to define barriers and opportunities as well as general connectivity
issues throughout the study area. The Consultant will assess connectivity in the proposed network through
detailed field assessments and documentation. Crafton Tull will develop specific recommendations to create an
active transportation network.
The Project Team will incorporate the findings from the field work into a project database. Maps will be
developed illustrating recommended facility types.
Task 2.3 Preliminary Active Transportation Network Development
Based on the information gathered in previous task, field work, and review of relevant local and regional plans,
Crafton Tull will develop recommendations for the active transportation network. These recommendations will
consist of the following:
• key linkages for bicycle and pedestrian connectivity,
• major bicycle and pedestrian facilities (including paved off road trails, greenways, etc.),
• any other facilities that have been determined to be of significance
• specific facility type recommendations for each proposed route
• general intersection treatments necessary to accommodate the active transportation network
Task 2.4 Client Review of Preliminary Network
The Crafton Tull Team will conduct a virtual meeting with the Client to review the preliminary network.
Task 2.5 Workshop 2: The Path Forward
The Crafton Tull Team will conduct a second workshop to present the preliminary active transportation network
and gather feedback, and conduct walk audits with the steering committee and stakeholders to evaluate
walkability in key areas of the CAMPO region.
The Crafton Tull Team will be responsible for developing meeting materials, handouts and presentations. The
Client will be responsible for arranging the meeting venue and logistics, as well as distributing meeting
notifications.
• Steering Committee Meeting
The Steering Committee will meet to review Network Recommendations as well as Case Study
alternatives and provide input for developing prioritization criteria and action steps.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
www.craftontull.com 6
• Walk Audits
The Crafton Tull Team will conduct a series of three interactive walk audits (one in conjunction with the
steering committee, one with stakeholders, and one with elected officials) to develop placemaking
concepts and solutions for circulation (vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle), parking, universal access, low
impact development concepts, wayfinding, beautification, and community character improvement. A
brief summary of the walk audits will be prepared that includes a list of opportunities and constraints
identified at the event.
• Public Meeting 2
The second meeting will be used to share the preliminary active transportation network. The meeting
will have the following objectives:
• Discuss best practices in facility type selection, design, and application and how these practices are
applied within the CAMPO study area
• Educate local citizens and stakeholder groups about successful solutions to common pedestrian an d
bicycle deficiencies
• Share information discovered during analysis and field assessments, and discuss bicycle and
pedestrian concepts for a communitywide network
• Present the draft active transportation network for public feedback
Task 2 Deliverables:
• Study network map
• Field assessment of critical connections in the study area
• Map(s) of draft network and associated databases
• Summary of the draft network
• Steering Committee meeting materials
• Walkshop summary
• Public Meeting 2 maps, graphics, and presentation
TASK 3: PRIORITIZATION AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
Crafton Tull will develop an implementation plan that identifies short-, medium- and long-term projects, as well
as a methodology for project prioritization, and general opinions of probable cost.
Task 3.1 Preliminary Estimates of Probable Cost (Planning-level)
Crafton Tull will develop a spreadsheet-based cost estimate to determine planning level costs for various
improvements (i.e. cost per foot of sidewalk). Total project estimates will not be provided, as bike & pedestrian
components are often only one part of an overall infrastructure project (i.e. a roadway design project that
include bike lanes but costs for road design options may vary). This task is intended to provide a comparison of
order of magnitude costs for specific routes or route segments.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
www.craftontull.com 7
Task 3.2 Project Prioritization Methodology
Crafton Tull will create a list of prioritized projects based on need, cost, ease of implementation, completing
network gaps, and other community-specific goals, as prioritized by the steering committee. The Consultant will
work with Client to develop criteria that will be used to determine project priority. Factors that could be
considered for prioritizing projects may include:
• Project feasibility/ease of implementation
• Relative planning-level costs
• Safety
• Completing gaps within the active transportation network
• Potential to improve access in areas with high user volumes and other key activity locations
• Public support (improvements suggested by citizens in the public meetings, Client input, and Steering
Committee discussions)
• Opportunities to provide facilities as a part of previously planned or upcoming projects (repaving and
reconstruction projects)
• Other priorities as identified during the public input process
Task 3.3 Implementation Strategy
The pedestrian and bicycle recommendations from Task 2 will be scored and prioritized into short-,
intermediate-, and long-term projects based on the prioritization methodology established in Task 3.2. Projects
will be phased, and potential funding sources will be outlined. This approach provides guidance for sequenced
project rollout, while allowing flexibility to adapt as implementation opportunities arise.
Task 3.4 Policy Development and Code Reform Recommendations
The Crafton Tull Team will provide recommendations on municipal policies and code regarding sidewalk,
greenway, and other active transportation modes, including development triggered construction requirements.
Policy and program recommendations will also be provided that encourage the use of walking, biking, and
transit as viable modes of transportation. These may include, but are not limited to, complete streets as well as
bicycle and pedestrian accommodation policies for last-mile connectivity.
Task 3.5 Virtual Client and Steering Committee Review (see Additional Services for a third in-person workshop)
The Crafton Tull Team will conduct virtual meetings with staff and the Steering Committee to review project
prioritization, implementation strategies, as well as code and policy recommendations.
Task 3 Deliverables:
• Project cost estimating tool for unit prices
• Project prioritization
• Implementation strategies
• Steering Committee meeting materials
• Public Meeting 3 maps, graphics, and presentation
__________________________________________________________________________________________
www.craftontull.com 8
TASK 4: MASTER PLAN DOCUMENTATION
The Crafton Tull Team will prepare draft and final versions of the CAMPO Active Transportation report. The final
report for the project will pull together the findings and public input generated in Tasks 1 through 3.
Task 4.1 Draft Report Development
The Draft Active Transportation Plan document will include written sections as well as maps that show the
locations of proposed projects. It will outline outcomes and recommendations from each of the tasks listed
above, and will include data on safety, accessibility, and efforts to increase use. The report will be illustrated
with graphic maps, photographs, charts and drawings as needed to support the text. It is anticipated that a local
map and project list for each community will be provided as part of the document.
Task 4.2 Client Review
The Draft Report will be made available for Client and Steering Committee review. If desired, a virtual meeting
will be held to review the plan document.
Task 4.3 Public Comment
The CAMPO Active Transportation Plan will be available for public comment. CAMPO staff will review comments
and indicate what sentiments should be reflected in the final plan.
Task 4.3 Final Report Development
Upon approval of the draft by the Client and Steering Committee, including comments from the public as
directed by CAMPO staff, the Crafton Tull Team will revise the draft document per such comments and prepare
a Final Report.
Task 4.4 Virtual Presentation to the CAMPO Board of Directors (Adoption Hearing)
Once the final plan has been completed, the Crafton Tull Team will prepare and deliver a virtual presentation for
City Council for plan adoption. The presentation will incorporate major themes, key highlights and summarize
plan recommendations.
Task 4.5 Local Jurisdiction Adoption
CAMPO staff will complete the Active Transportation Plan process by presenting the document to local
jurisdictions for adoption.
Task 4 Deliverables:
• Draft plan report with network maps (digital copies)
• Final plan report and executive summary (digital copies and 10 printed copies)
• Adoption presentation materials
__________________________________________________________________________________________
www.craftontull.com 9
ADDITIONAL SERVICES
The following tasks can be provided as additional services for the fees indicated.
Task 3.5 Workshop 3: Building Success – IN PERSON (Additional $5,000)
The Crafton Tull Team will conduct the third and final workshop to review the active transportation plan
recommendations.
The Crafton Tull Team will be responsible for developing meeting materials, handouts and presentations. The
Client will be responsible for arranging the meeting venue and logistics, as well as distributing meeting
notifications.
• Steering Committee Meeting
The Steering Committee will meet to review project prioritization and implementation strategies.
• Public Meeting 3
This final public meeting will be used to garner feedback on the active transportation network and its
affiliated implementation strategies and phasing.
NOTE: No construction plans or details are included in this contract. Construction documents can be provided
as an Additional Service or as part of a separate contract. Boundary and topographic surveys may be
completed as an additional service if adequate information is unavailable.
Should there be additions to this scope of services, those services shall be compensated for additional fee.
Effective January 1, 2022
Hourly Hourly
Category Rate Category Rate
ARCHITECTURE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
VICE PRESIDENT OF ARCHITECTURE ……………..185$ SR. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ………………………………..145$
DIRECTOR OF ARCHITECTURE ……………………….175$ PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ……………………..110$
SR. PROJECT MANAGER ……………………………….160$ LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT INTERN II ……………………….85$
PROJECT MANAGER ………………………………………150$ LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT INTERN I ……………………….75$
SR. PROJECT ARCHITECT ……………………………….140$ LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE DESIGNER ………………………..80$
PROJECT ARCHITECT …………………………………130$ PLANNING
INTERN ARCHITECT III …………………………………..100$ PLANNING MANAGER …………………………………..170$
INTERN ARCHITECT II ………………………………………90$ SR. PLANNER ………………………………………………..155$
INTERN ARCHITECT I ………………………………………..80$ PROJECT PLANNER …………………………………….120$
SR. DESIGNER …………………………………………………….120$ PLANNER II …………………………………………………..100$
DESIGNER III …………………………………………………105$ PLANNER I ………...……………………………………………..85$
DESIGNER II ……………………………………………..85$ INSPECTION
DESIGNER I ……………………………………………….75$ SR. INSPECTOR …………………………………………..110$
BIM COORDINATOR III …………………………………..70$ INSPECTOR II …………………………………………………….95$
BIM COORDINATOR II ………………………………………55$ INSPECTOR I ………………………………………………….65$
BIM COORDINATOR I …………………………………….45$ SURVEYING
CIVIL ENGINEERING PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR PRINCIPAL ……………………………190$
ENGINEERING PRINCIPAL ……………………………..210$ SR. PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR ……………………………150$
SR. ENGINEERING MANAGER …………………………195$ PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR ………………………….120$
ENGINEERING MANAGER ………………………………..175$ SURVEY PROJECT MANAGER ………………………..115$
SR. PROJECT ENGINEER ……………………………….155$ SURVEY COORDINATOR ……………………………………95$
PROJECT ENGINEER …………………………………….130$ SURVEYOR INTERN ………………………………………..85$
ENGINEER INTERN III ……………………………………..120$ SURVEY PARTY CHIEF II …………………………………………..85$
ENGINEER INTERN II ……………………………………..110$ SURVEY PARTY CHIEF I …………………………………………..75$
ENGINEER INTERN I ……………………………………….100$ SURVEY TECHNICIAN III …………………………………..65$
SR. ENGINEERING DESIGNER …………………………..140$ SURVEY TECHNICIAN II ……………………………………..55$
ENGINEERING DESIGNER III …………………………….110$ SURVEY TECHNICIAN I ……………………………………..45$
ENGINEERING DESIGNER II ……………………………..90$ GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS
ENGINEERING DESIGNER I ………………………………80$ GIS MANAGER ………………………………………………..110$
ENGINEERING CAD TECHNICIAN III ………………………..75$ GIS ANALYST …………………...……………………………..90$
ENGINEERING CAD TECHNICIAN II ……………………..65$ GIS TECHNICIAN II ………………………………………………65$
ENGINEERING CAD TECHNICIAN I ………………………50$ GIS TECHNICIAN I ……………………………………………50$
ENVIRONMENTAL REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER ……………………….185$ GPS Equipment………...….....….………..…....$35/Hour
SR. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST ……………………….145$ Robotic Survey Equipment…….………........…$20/Hour
PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST …………120$ LiDAR Scanning Equipment ……………….…..$35/Hour
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST II ……………………….100$ UAV …………………………………….………$1000/Unit
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST I ……………………….80$ Job Related Mileage……….....................……$0.58/Mile
ADMINISTRATIVE Per Diem for Out of Town Crews…..Per GSA Allowable
ADMINISTRATIVE PRINCIPAL ……………………………….185$ Airfare and other travel related expenses……….At Cost
ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGER ………………………………..145$ Black and white 8.5"x11" Copies ….…....... $0.15/sheet
ADMINISTRATIVE IV ………………………………………..100$ Color 8.5"x11" Copies …….…….…...….…. $1.50/sheet
ADMINISTRATIVE III …………………………………………..80$ Photo Paper Color Plan Sheet Copies …... $0.75/sq. ft.
ADMINISTRATIVE II …………………………………………..55$ Reproducible Plan Copies (Vellum) …........ $1.50/sq. ft
ADMINISTRATIVE I …………………………………………….45$ Reproducible Plan Copies (Bond) …......…. $0.35/sq. ft.
All rates are subject to change without notice.
Exhibit "B"
Standard Hourly Rate Schedule
EXHIBIT C PROJECT SCHEDULE
CAMPO Active Transportation Plan
C-1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Task 1 Kickoff, Existing Facilities, Visioning, Coordination
1.1 Virtual Kickoff Meeting
1.2 Ongoing Coordination
1.3 Public Engagement Plan
1.4 Previous Plans Review & Assessment
1.5 Data Collection & Base Mapping
1.6 Existing Facilities & Existing Conditions Analysis
1.7 Sidewalk Inventory (by CAMPO)
1.8 Workshop 1:Site Tour, Steering Committee Meeting, (6)
Stakeholder Group Meetings, Public Meeting WS 1
Task 2 Preliminary Network, Assessment, Recommendations
2.1 Develop Study Network
2.2 Assess Study Network
2.3 Preliminary Network Development
2.4 Client Review
2.5 Workshop 2: Steering Committee, Walk Audits, Public Meeting 2 WS 2
Task 3 Prioritization & Implementation Plan
3.1 Preliminary Estimates of Probable Cost
3.2 Project Prioritization
3.3 Implementation Strategy
3.4 Policy Development & Code Reform Recommendations
3.5 Virtual Client & Steering Committee Review
Task 4 Master Plan Documentation
4.1 Draft Report Development
4.2 Client Review
4.3 Public Comment
4.4 Final Report Development
4.5 Virtual Adoption Hearings (CAMPO, City of Jefferson, City of
Holt's Summit
4.6 Other Local Jurisdiction Adoption (by CAMPO)
Months from Notice to Proceed
Agenda Item 8B
CAMPO Technical Committee Staff Report
Safe Action Plan Grant Opportunity – USDOT Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A)
July 7, 2022
Summary
The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) established the new Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) discretionary
program with $5 billion in appropriated funds over the next 5 years. In fiscal year 2022 (FY22), up to $1 billion is
available. The SS4A program funds regional, local, and Tribal initiatives through grants to prevent roadway deaths
and serious injuries. The SS4A program supports the National Roadway Safety Strategy and the USDOT’s goal of
zero deaths and serious injuries on our nation’s roadways.
At the May 18 Board of Directors meeting staff was asked to look into this grant program and provide more
information to the Technical Committee and Board of Directors on CAMPO’s eligibility to apply. SS4A provides
funding for either creation of a Safety Action Plan or implementation of an existing plan. CAMPO does not have an
existing plan and would only be eligible for the development of a plan.
A Safety Action Plan would consist of the following components:
• Leadership commitment and goal setting that includes a goal timeline for eliminating roadway fatalities
and serious injuries.
• Planning structure through a committee, task force, implementation group, or similar body charged with
oversight of the Action Plan development, implementation, and monitoring.
• Safety analysis of the existing conditions and historical trends that provides a baseline level of crashes
involving fatalities and serious injuries across a jurisdiction, locality, Tribe, or region.
• Engagement and collaboration with the public and relevant stakeholders, including the private sector and
community groups, that allows for both community representation and feedback.
• Equity considerations developed through a plan using inclusive and representative processes.
• Policy and process changes that assess the current policies, plans, guidelines, and/or standards to identify
opportunities to improve how processes prioritize transportation safety.
• Strategy and project selections that identify a comprehensive set of projects and strategies, shaped by data,
the best available evidence and noteworthy practices, as well as stakeholder input and equity considerations,
that will address the safety problems described in the Action Plan.
• Progress and transparency methods that measure progress over time after an Action Plan is developed or
updated, including outcome data.
Once a plan is in place a jurisdiction is eligible to apply for implementation funds to achieve the following:
• Additional analysis
• Expanded data collection and evaluation using integrated data
• Testing Action Plan concepts before project and strategy implementation
• Feasibility studies using quick-build strategies that inform permanent projects in the future (e.g., paint, plastic
bollards)
• Follow-up stakeholder engagement and collaboration
• Targeted equity assessments
• Progress report development
• Complementary planning efforts such as speed management plans, accessibility and transition plans, racial
and health equity plans, and lighting management plans
Applications are due September 15th and require a 20% local match. For Action Plan Grants, award amounts are
based on estimated costs, with an expected minimum of $200,000 for all applicants, an expected maximum of
$1,000,000 for a State or a federally recognized Tribal government, and an expected maximum of $5,000,000 for an
MPO or a joint application comprised of a multijurisdictional group of entities that is regional in scope.
Staff has attended USDOT webinars and is in the process of exploring an application. More information on the SS4A
grant fund can be found in the attached on the USDOT website at https://www.transportation.gov/grants/SS4A. Staff
will provide regular updates.
Agenda Item 8C
CAMPO Technical Committee Staff Report
Status of Current Work Tasks
July 7, 2022
Summary
The following list includes work tasks that are currently in progress or have been completed since the
previous meeting:
• FY 2023 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) amendment/modification. The FY2023
UPWP was adopted by the Board of Directors in May 2022. Since that adoption, Jefferson City’s
City Council has been begun a process to look into increasing employee salaries. This may
impact with CAMPO budget and FY2023 UPWP. Staff will provide an update to the Board of
Directors and Technical Committee if and when a modification or amendment may be needed in
the future.
• 2023-2027 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) amendment. Staff has been notified
that an amendment is pending for August.
• JEFFTRAN Transit Facility Feasibility Study. A final document has been completed and is
under review by Federal Transit Administration and Jefferson City Public Works Staff. An
updated presentation will be given to the Technical Committee at a future meeting.
• GIS Assistance. Staff continues providing technical assistance regarding GIS data and mapping
to member jurisdictions for various projects. Staff will be attending the virtual ESRI Conference
in July.
• Capital Area Active Plan. See staff report.
• SS4A (Safety Action Plan) Grant Application. See staff report.
• BRO Funding Rankings. Planning partners will be asked to rank applications within their areas
after all applications have been received. Applications are due July 27th. Rankings may occur in
August. See attached flyer on changes to the BRO program.
• TAP Funding Rankings. Planning partners will be asked to rank applications within their areas
after all applications have been received. Applications are due July 15th. Rankings may occur in
August. Four applications are anticipated within the CAMPO region.
OFF-SYSTEMLOCAL BRIDGE
1
The off-system local bridge replacement program (BRO) has changed to a distribution of money based on
the area of poor condition bridge deck, rather than a distribution based upon bridges being deficient.
Additional money was made TABLE 1 BRO Program Amounts per MoDOT Districtavailable for the BRO program
with the passage of the
Infrastructure Investment and
Jobs Act (IIJA) in late 2021.
Under IIJA, the minimum
allocation percentage for the BRO
program was increased from 15%
to 20%, which is estimated to add
approximately $7 million to the
annual BRO allocation.
Table 1 shows a summary of these
changes from 2021 to 2022.
IIJA also allocates new funding for the bridge replacement, rehabilitation, preservation, protection, and
construction program (hereafter, Bridge Formula Program (BFP)).
The BFP requires that 15% of available funds be spent on off-system bridges with no local match
requirement (funded at 100%). FHWA has recommended that funding be allocated based on the
percentage of poor deck area, which would be 20.35% on the off-system.
TABLE 2 Bridge Formula Program Off-System
For federal fiscal year 2022-2024, $15.7 million has
been allocated for the off-system BFP. For federal
fiscal year 2025 and 2026, $29.7 million will be
allocated for the off-system BFP, which brings the
total allocation for the 5 year program to 20.35% for
local bridges.
The funds for the BFP program will be distributed in
the same manner as the BRO program.
Table 2 shows how the funding would be
allocated to each MoDOT District.
It is anticipated that the amounts available for 2023
thru 2026 will be allocated in a similar manner,
making the total amount available for the off-system
BFP approximately $106.5 million.
Distribution by county has resulted in the accumulation of large unspent balances for the BRO program and
will continue even with the increase in BRO funds from the passage of IIJA.
Moving forward, the BRO program will be modernized to distribute the funding on a regional (per MoDOT
District) basis using the total deck area of poor bridges in the region.
Federal fiscal year 2022 (current year) will be used as a transition year in which all existing negative county
balances will be cleared before the statewide funds are distributed to a region.
Counties will be allowed to carry existing positive balances forward into the regional program.
Regions will be required to honor all existing project commitments within the region prior to distributing any
regional funds to new projects.
JUNE 2022
TABLE 4 BRO Allocations 2023 and Beyond
2
TABLE 3 2022 BRO Transition Year
TABLE 5 Summary of Funds Available for Projects
Initially, applications for three years of funding will be requested from the local entities. Regional committees
will be established to make the final determination of bridges selected for the initial three year schedule. The
bridge schedule will then be updated and added to on a yearly basis.
The soft match credit program will continue to be available.
The net result of the funding increases in IIJA means that around $214 million will be available over the next
five years for bridge projects on the off-system.
Table 5 provides a summary of the total funds available for each of the upcoming federal fiscal years.
O F F -S Y S T E MLOCAL BRIDGE
Table 3 shows how the
transition year will look
on a regional basis.
Table 4 shows the
anticipated future (FFY
2023 and beyond) BRO
funding distribution.
J U N E 2 0 2 2