HomeMy Public PortalAbout2022-08-11 packetNotice of Meeting & Tentative Agenda
City of J effe rson Public Works & Plann ing Committee
Thursday ,August11,2022
7:30a.m.
John G. Christy Municipal Building , 320 East McCarty Street
Council Chambers Room (Upper Level)
);;.> Note: VIRTUAL and IN-PERSON MEETING
To join virtually:
https://jeffersoncity.webex.com/jeffersoncity/j .php?MTID=m66294995248f062050636eclef236151
To join virtually call -in available at 1-404-397-1516
Meeting number (access code): 2495 057 2718
Meeting password : 1234
T E NTATIVE A GE NDA
1. Introductions
2 . Approval of the July 14 and July 27, 2022 Committee meeting minutes
3. Old Business
1) Ten Hour Parking (Britt Smith)
2) High Street Viaduct (David Bange)
3) Program for Upgrading Private Stormwater Systems (Don Fontana/David Bange)
4) Historic Legacy District Ordinance (Rachel Senzee)
5) Bird scooters (Ryan Moehlman)
4. Citizen opportunity to address Council/Staff on Stormwater and Other Public Works Issues
5. Reports: Neighborhood Service Grant Updates (Rachel Senzee)
6. Adjourn
NOTES
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under
the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request.
Please call (573) 634-6410 with questions regarding agenda items .
MINUTES
JEFFERSON CITY
PUBLIC WORKS AND PLANNING COMMITTEE
John G. Christy Municipal Building, 320 East McCarty Street
Council Chambers and Virtual
Committee Members Present:
Ron Fitzwater
David Kemna
Mike Lester
Mark Schreiber
Scott Spencer
Staff Present:
Matt Morasch, Director of Public Works
Britt Smith, Operations Division Director
David Bange, City Engineer
Don Fontana, Stormwater Engineer
Jon Fitch, Civil Engineer II
Mark Mehmert, Transit Division Director
July 14, 2022
Sonny Sanders, Director of Planning and Protective Services
Eric Barron, Planning/MPO Manager
Rachel Senzee, Neighborhood Services Supervisor
Anne Stratman, Neighborhood Services Specialist
Katrina Williams, Planner.
David Grellner, Environmental Health Director
Jessica Rackers, IT · ··
Ryan Moehlman, CityCounselor
Steve Crowell, City Administrator
Brenda Wunderlich, Administrative Supervisor
Attendance
4 of4
4 of4
4 of4
4 of4
4 of4
Chairman Fi~ater called the meeting to order at 7:34 a.m. A quorum was present at this
time. The following guests attended the meeting: Mayor Carrie Tergin; Councilman Derrick
Spicer, .. C,ouncilman Jack Deeken; Kris Scheperle; Luke Holtschneider; Mr. and Mrs. Dean
Hughes;· Angela Hirsch; Eric Landwehr; Frank Rycyk; Natalie Newville; Matt Brenneke; and
Harry Otto.
1) Introductions
No formal introductions were made at this time.
Chairman Fitzwater requested Item 3.13. be moved to the front of the agenda.
2) Approval of the June 9, 2022 Committee meeting minutes
Councilman Lester moved and Councilman Kemna seconded to approve the June 9,
2022 minutes, motion carried.
Minutes/Jefferson City Public Works and Planning Committee
July 14, 2022
3) New Business
13. Yard Waste Drop Off and Composting Contract (Sonny Sanders)
2
Mr. Scheperle explained the current economic situation has caused an extreme increase
of nearly 10% in the cost of operation of the Yard Waste Recycling Center. He requested the
Committee approve an amendment to the Slh year starting November 1, 2022 of the current
contract to increase the contract payment and the amount charged for drop off and loading fees.
There was discussion among Committee members, staff and Mr. Scheperle regarding
the fuel prices and contract fees. Mr. Moehlman explained if the co~,~~~!1! were amended it would
be an extra contractual document which would be subject to chaii~Jjg~s: The Committee took no
action on the request. ·· ··
1. High Street Viaduct (David Bange)
Mr. Bange explained a bus driver called the Street Division regarding a pothole in the
viaduct. He then gave a photo presentation of the pothole and other placeifofinfiltration on the
viaduct. ·
There was discussion among Committee members and·staff regarding the damage, the
steel plate over the pothole, the MoDOT inspection, contracting with Bartlett and West to
evaluate the viaduct, and doing repairs.
Mr. Morasch stated the cost to replace the vi~duct is ne11~1y $12 million today and there
is only $5 million in the sales tax for this. · ,. · ,; ,
Councilman Sp
weight limit put on it w.
'": -i:·: .. ··~·i,:
' .~Waif~pncerne~ ;.~tt:t. safety ~~<:f.itelt the viaduct should have a
would ~~~nd the lif~]of the viaduct.
Chairman FitZW~ter requested staff bring the contract for design back to the Committee
before sending the City~!,lncil; ; ·
2. Street DivisiQn Trucks and Frame Damage (Britt Smith)
't ..
Mr. Smith explain~C:tTruck 209 is a 2006 model tandem axel dump truck. During a recent
inspection of the truck, sot11e cracks 'and distresses were noted with the frame. Staff believes
the truck can get another year of life out of the truck, but would need to do regular inspections.
There was discussion .among Committee members, staff, and those present regarding
the cost, supply chain issues, and the under wash.
3. Atchison Court Vacation Update (David Bange)
Mr. Bange explained staff is requesting the Committee approve the recommendation to
vacate Atchison Court and would support providing a thin layer of overlay.
There was discussion among Committee members and staff regarding Lincoln University
wanted the street repaired prior to it being vacated, there being no public interest in the
property, and the Committee not willing to use funds to overlay.
Minutes/Jefferson City Public Works and Planning Committee
July 14, 2022
3
Councilman Kemna moved and Councilman Spencer seconded to refer a vacation of the
street in its current condition to the City Council with recommendation to approve, motion
carried.
4. Parking Report and Pay by App (Britt Smith)
Mr. Smith explained staff has been researching moving to mobile payments for metered
parking. Staff would like to increase the parking time on the blocks of 1 00 Madison, 1 00 W
Capital Ave, 1 00, 200, and 300 E Capital and 1 00 Jefferson Street. He stated the parking
garage report should be available in mid-August.
There was discussion among Committee members and staff regarding setting the rate of
$1 per hour for parking in those blocks, increasing the minimum fine·amount for an expired long-
term meter, the current vendor, and the convenience.
Councilman Spencer moved and Councilman Lester seconded to refer the request to the
City Council with recommendation to approve, motion carried.
5. City/County Economic Development Project.Aigoa Multimodal Facility
(Luke Holtschneider/Matt Morasch)
•' l,,)
Mr. Holtschneider explained the federal, state, city snd county will fund the infrastructure
development with grant funds and City/County sales tax funds •. The site for the facility is located
in the Algoa area. Supporters have said ·having!.raib$ccess wolllld. provide industries in the park
the opportunity to ship or receive goods in rail-car quantities, whiQh:'has been shown to be more
cost effective, reliable and fL.Iel.~fficient tharl·tran$pbitati6rt'1~iajn.ick. Mr. Landwehr stated the
project is split into two pl:\ases under Cole:~eC)anty with the\"itity participation. Mr. Morasch
asked that a developmentagreementbe done•befween the county and city.
Councilman Kemna moved and Councilman. Schreiber seconded to endorse the project,
motion carried.
6. Program for .Upgrading Private Stormwater Systems (Don
Fontana/David Bange)
Mr. Bange explained a means to address private stormwater systems through the
expansion of the Neighborhood Improvement Program that is currently used for citizen
requested sidewalk, curb, and gutter projects.
There was discussion among Committee members and staff regarding the code
amendment, the cost, and having funds available.
Chairman Fitzwater requested this item be brought to the August Committee meeting.
7. Transit Studies Review (Mark Mehmert)
Mr. Mehmert explained 51 percent of Jefftran's riders use the bus to get to and from
work and ridership is up 12-1/2 percent from last year. He further explained the several studies
that had been done for the Transit system.
Minutes/Jefferson City Public Works and Planning Committee
July 14, 2022
Ms. Hirsch, Chairwoman of the Public Transit Advisory Committee, explained the
Committee does not support the suspension of bus fares and have concerns with the ridership.
There was discussion among Committee members, staff, and those present regarding
the potential to raise bus fares, the impact on riders and staff, and using a token system.
Councilman Deeken stated he did not see a problem with the suspension of the bus
fares for a time period. He requested this item go back to the City Council.
8. Additional Funds for Overlay and Micro Surfacing $250K (Britt Smith)
Mr. Morasch explained staff had to cut the overlay and micf:o surfacing contracts due to
the cost. Mr. Smith explained staff had to cut $240,000.00 outoftha projects which included
four streets. A change order and supplemental would need tO be brought forward to the Council
at the next meeting.
There was discussion among Committee rru~(l1bers and staff regarding the costs and
possibly using ARPA funds.
Councilman Spencer moved and Council Lester seconded to refer the change orders
and supplemental appropriations to the City Council with recommendation to approve, motion
carried.
9. Capital Area Active Transportation Plan (Katrina Williams)
4
Ms. Williams explained the plan would incorporate ancLr~place the Capital Area
Pedestrian & Bicycle Plan, Jefferson City's Sidewalk Plan, the Greenway Master Plan and the
Holts Summit Pedestri~o, 'Bicycle, ~nd Transit:ptiln. Public Engagement will include stakeholder
interviews, steering committee meeting, public survey, public meetings, outreach at evens,
speaking engagements, and webpage/social media .. The date for the Steering Committee
meeting is July 28 for a meet and greet.
10. CDBG-DRProposal Resolution (Rachel Senzee)
Chairman Fitzwater.explained this item is on the City Council agenda for the July 181h
meeting so no discussion Vi(@,~ held.
11. CDBG 2022 Annual Action Report (Rachel Senzee)
Ms. Stratmanga~~8cpresentation of the report. She explained the CDBG programs
include down payment a~sistant, emergency assistance repair, infrastructure improvements,
and demolition.
12. Historic Legacy District Ordinance (Rachel Senzee)
Ms. Senzee explained the purpose of this ordinance is to allow the creation of the
Districts. The ordinance would formally recognize geographical areas of historical and cultural
significance that no longer exist.
There was discussion among Committee members and staff regarding the application
process and citizen interest in historic places.
Minutes/Jefferson City Public Works and Planning Committee
July 14, 2022
5
Chairman Fitzwater requested this item be on the August Committee meeting agenda for
approval to give members a chance to review.
4) Citizen opportunity to address Council/Staff on Stormwater and Other Public
Works Issues
• Sign Code Discussion (Sonny Sanders)
Mr. Sanders explained there has been a desire to revise the City's sign code
mentioned at several Council and Committee meetings. Mr. Barron stated
changes are needed to bring the code into compliance with a Supreme Court
ruling (Reed vs. Town of Gilbert). Mr. Sanders stated this item will come back to
the Committee in November.
• Mr. Hughes explained the cemetery located next to his property has fencing with barb
wire and is in serious disrepair and has poison ivy all over the fencing. He stated he had
contacted Parks with his concerns regarding elderly and the children ~arety. Mr.
Sanders explained the cemetery is controllecJ by Planning and Protective Services
through the cemetery board is responsible f()r it and will look into the issuias.
• Councilman Spencer requested information on the Bird scooters as he has received
many calls from citizens. Mr. Moehlman will look in the agreement. Chairman Fitzwater
requested this item be placed on the August Committ~e agenda.
• Chairman Fitzwater asked about the Parking Garage closure on July 4.
Mr. Smith ~)(pl~ined the police dep~rtment has put up barricades for the last few
years due to issues in the garage. ·
• Mr. Moehlman explained the State of Missouri will be building a health lab on the MSP
property.
• Chairrn~nFitzwatekexplained the State ofMissouri is working to rehabilitate the old
Union Hotel.
5) ij.eports: Neighborhood Service Grant Updates (Rachel Senzee)
Ms. Seq~~e gave an update on the grants. She explained staff is continually looking for
opportunities for use of grant funds. She stated this item will be a continual agenda item to
update the public about funding opportunities, give Council the information to provide their
respective constituency, and provide information to support budgetary decisions.
6) Adjourn
Councilman Kemna moved and Councilman Lester seconded to adjourn the meeting at
this time, 10:34 a.m., motion carried.
MINUTES
JEFFERSON CITY
PUBLIC WORKS AND PLANNING COMMITTEE
John G. Christy Municipal Building, 320 East McCarty Street
Council Chambers and Virtual
Committee Members Present:
Ron Fitzwater
Mike Lester
Scott Spencer
Committee Members Absent:
David Kemna
Mark Schreiber
Staff Present:
Matt Morasch, Director of Public Works
Britt Smith, Operations Division Director
David Bange, City Engineer
Don Fontana, Stormwater Engineer
Jon Fitch, Civil Engineer II
Tia Griffin, Civil Engineer II
July 27, 2022
Sonny Sanders, Director of Planning and Protective Services
Katrina Williams, Planner
Matt Schofield, Fire Chief
Ron Childs, IT
Grant Haarmann, IT
Ryan Moehlman, City Counselor
Steve Crowell, City Administrator
Brenda Wunderlich, Administrative Supervisor
Attendance
4 of4
4 of4
4 of4
4 of4
4 of4
Chairman Fitzwater called the meeting to order at 12:00 noon. A quorum was present at
this time. The following guests attended the meeting: Mayor Carrie Tergin; Councilman Jack
Deeken;. Bill Luebbert; Frank RycyK; Ed Rackers; Roger Schwartze, Bob Gilbert and Todd
Kempker with Bartlett and West; Jim Wisch; Tom Rackers; Luke Holtschneider; Harry Otto; Jeff
Schaeperkoetter; Gary Plummer; and Anna Watson with News Tribune.
1) Introductions
No formal introductions were made at this time.
2) Old Business
1. High Street Viaduct
Chairman Fitzwater explained he does not want the viaduct to get to a critical
point. He stated the subject will be on the next Committee meeting on August 11 to
review cost and potential funding sources.
Minutes/Jefferson City Public Works and Planning Committee
July 14, 2022
2
Mr. Morasch distributed copies of the High Street Viaduct discussion points staff
developed. He explained currently Bartlett and West has submitted a scope of work for
emergency contract work and the Law is working with Public Works to finalize this
contract.
There was discussion among Committee members, staff, and those present
regarding continual evaluations of the viaduct, safety of citizens and vehicles, not
looking to remove the viaduct due to its traffic counts, permitting applications with the
railroad, timing, the possibility of funding from the State of Missouri, Cole County, and
grants, bonding, weight limit and netting underneath.
Mr. Moehlman explained bonding on a Capital Improvement Project would be
hard to do since the sales tax sunsets every five years;
3) Adjourn
Chairman Fitzwater adjourned the meeting ~tt~is time (1:1~ p.m.).
. .~ ·~-~
Correspondence Received
Parking Bill 2022-050
Donaldson, Emi ly
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
More input on the parking issue.
Britt E. Smith, P.E. F.NSPE
Operations Division Director
Jefferson City Public Works
573-634-6450
bsmith@jeffersoncitymo .gov
Smith, Britt
Friday, August 5, 2022 9:37 AM
Donaldson, Emily
FW : Can't attend tonight's meeting, but more i nfo
From: Laura A. Ward <wardsinjeffcity@mchsi.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 2, 2022 11:02 AM
To: Steve Spradlin <steveofashland@gmail.com>
Cc: Fitzwater, Ron <RFitzwater@jeffersoncitymo.gov>; Lester, Mike <Mikelester@jeffersoncitymo.gov>; Smith, Britt
<BSmith@jeffersoncitymo.gov>
Subject: Re: Can't attend tonight's meeting, but more info
Good morning,
Thank you for the addition information. I'm sharing my apologies because unfortunately; I was not able to
attend last night because my husband and I had to rush to St. Louis to be with his mom in the hospital.
I watched the meeting on YouTube this morning and due to the comments shared by citizens in both the 200
and 300 blocks, this issue will go back to the Public Works Committee on August 11 at 7:30a.m. There will be
an opportunity for public comment at this time.
I have copied Councilman Fitzwater on this communication as he is the sponsor of this bill and Chair of the
Public Works Committee. Also copied are Councilman Lester, who also represents Ward 2, and Britt Smith,
Operations Director of the Airport, Parking and Streets Division.
Thank you,
Laura
Laura A. Ward
115 West Atchison Street
Jefferson City, MO 65101
573-999-0915
From: "Steve Spradlin" <steveofashland@qmail.com >
To: "Michael & Laura Ward" <WardsinJeffCitv@mchsi.com >, "Steve Spradlin" <steveofashland@gmail.com >
Sent: Monday, August 1, 2022 3:03:38 PM
Subject: Can't attend tonight's meeting, but more info
Hi, Laura. I'm sorry, but I won't be able to attend the meeting tonight afterall. Luckily, you have relayed my~
I did put a few more notes together that you can please share with the other councilpersons. Many of these 1
customers' needs, but to the customers for the other businesses on 200E block of E Capitol.
EXISTING METERED STREET PARKING
(showing number of regular and handicapped spaces)
200E -21 reg, 2 he
1 00 E -25 reg, 2 he
1 OOW-4 reg, 2 he
A total of 50 regular metered spots and 6 handicapped metered spots -that is a LOT of current metered spa
have street spaces available when the City agrees to allow full day parking (for Capitol reps and senators??).
show who actually parks there.
GENERAL COMMENTS
Metered parking is a necessary service to citizens and businesses of JC that supports businesses of the City
Provides accessibility, convenience and safety to citizens
Removal of that service will hurt or destroy local businesses in the downtown area affected.
Income the City receives from metered parking should be used to maintain that parking service to the citizen~
that violate parking rules.
Citizens pay for City services -available parking in the downtown area for all that want to park should be mac
be given away to others.
Even if all spots in the 200E block are not filled by by all day parkers, the cost of the City meters needs to be
in downtown.
ACCESSIBILITY (related to my massage therapy business on E Capitol)
Customers need street leve l access. Most customers are coming because of a pain issue.
Some clients park need handicap parking that is in front of my office
I myself often have to pay to park in front of my own office for 2 hours because of the need to enter at street I
SAFETY (related to my massage therapy business on E Capitol)
Currently, safety is not a concern because of the on-street parking with great visibility and well lit.
Most female clients would not feel safe coming in via a back entrance with no visibility.
OTHER PARKING OPTIONS (related to my massage therapy business on E Capitol)
Other than the City garage, there are no alternate parking options where a client can enter through the front E
If all day parking is allowed, the parking garage will probably be full because of displaced street parkers .
All client sessions are scheduled in advance. So customers must have availability of immediate parking spot~
Capitol politicians who are parking all day.
2
The current 2 hour maximum metered parking is perfect because my customers need no less than 2 hours p:
cents.
My business and others in the 200 E block should not be singled out to suffer.
SUGGESTION
Leave parking as is east of Madison IN THE 200E block where there are several businesses with customers
day. Do the all day parking WEST of Monroe only! There are MANY parking spots between there and the C
BUSINESSES THAT WILL SUFFER.
Thanks, Laura!
Reply Forward
3
Donaldson, Emily
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Smith, Britt
Monday, August 1, 2022 7:15PM
Donaldson, Emily; Morasch, Matt
Fwd: Parking changes on E. Capital Avenue
Britt E. Smith, P.E
Begin forwarded message :
From: "Griffin, Tia" <tgriffin@jeffersoncitymo.gov>
Date: August 1, 2022 at 5:19:38 PM EDT
To: "Smith, Britt" <bsmith@jeffersoncitymo.gov>
Subject: FW: Parking changes on E. Capital Avenue
See below
From: shelnel47@embarqmail.com <shelnel47@embarqmail.com>
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2022 4:01 PM
To: Griffin, Tia <tgriffin@jeffersoncitymo.gov>
Subject: Parking changes on E. Capital Avenue
Dear Sir or Madem,
The proposed increases for metered parking on E. Capital Avenue by the United Methodist Church will
make it more difficult for persons who are visiting the church, especially during the work week. Many
people make quick visits to the church for meetings and practical matters and are finished in less than
an half hour. Currently the turnover in those parking slots is high enough to accommodate many visitors
during a morning or afternoon. lncreaseing the cost and changing the unit oftime to use the meters will
complicate comings and goings at the church . This is especially true since there is no church parking lot
and few alternative nearby slots .
Also, $1 to pay for a slot is a lot for low income people who come to the church during the work week.
Please take advise from citizens who are freqently in the area .
Thank you .
Sheila Murphy
Sent from Mail for Windows
Donaldson, Emi ly
From: Smith, Britt
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Monday, August 1, 2022 7:15 PM
Donaldson, Emily; Morasch, Matt
Fwd : Parking around JCFUMC change
Britt E. Smith, P.E
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Griffin, Tia" <tgriffin@jeffersoncitymo.gov>
Date: August 1, 2022 at 5:19:12 PM EDT
To: "Smith, Britt" <bsmith@jeffersoncitymo.gov>
Subject: FW: Parking around JCFUMC change
See below
From: lindabartley45@gmail.com <lindabartley45@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2022 3:18 PM
To: Griffin, Tia <tgriffin@jeffersoncitymo.gov>
Subject: Parking around JCFUMC change
I would like to respectfully request that consideration be given concerning the
planned change to increase the parking t o $1 per hour around JCFUMC. In
addition to our regular services, funerals, & weddings we have several community
organizations meeting at our church. We are committed to helping our neighbors
through various JC organizations.
Thank you,
Linda Bartley
8 Viru s-free. www .avast.com
Donaldson, Emily
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Smith, Britt
Monday, August 1, 2022 7:14PM
Donaldson, Emi ly; Morasch, Matt
Fwd : Parking Meter fee increase
Britt E. Smith, P.E
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Griffin, Tia" <tgriffin@jeffersoncitymo.gov>
Date: August 1, 2022 at 5:18:34 PM EDT
To: "Smith, Britt" <bsmith@jeffersoncitymo .gov>
Subject: FW: Parking Meter fee increase
See Below
From: Karen Taylor <ktaylor@jcfumc.org>
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2022 3:01 PM
To: Griffin, Tia <tgriffin@jeffersoncitymo.gov>
Subject: Parking Mete r fee increase
The proposal to increase the meter rate from a quarter an hour to a dollar an hour will be detrimental to
our ministry at First United Method ist Church. We do a lot for the community by offering space for
meetings, hosting community events, etc . at no charge . The increase in parking fees will be a challenge
for those who are often donating the i r time to serve others in the community. The increase in fees will
create more challenges for access to our building than the current 2-hour time frame causes . I hope the
City Council seriously reconsiders this increase.
Sincerely,
Karen Taylor
REV. KAREN TAY L O R
PASTOR OF MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP
FIRST UNITED METHODIST-JEFFERSON CITY
573-635-6886
Dear City Council Members,
Downtown Jefferson City
PO Box 652
J e fferson City, MO 65102
5 7 3 -291-3524<
The Downtown Association would like to communicate our support of the downtown parking
meter change. As we have communicated previously, parking in Downtown Jefferson City
continues to be a pain point, and we are always looking for new ways to address it for our
community . Studies that have been done throughout the years support the need for more parking ,
and as business owners, employees, and community members who spend a lot oftime Downtown,
we see the need firsthand.
Our thriving downtown is a paramount component of Jefferson City's quality of life . Downtown
provides a central gathering place for entertainment, civic life and commerce . Downtown is a focal
point for our city's identity and pride , attracting visitors and projecting a healthy community
image.
Additionally, we would like to see a renewed discussion on the parking garage situation in
downtown . The dollars generated from those visiting and doing business in downtown generate
economic growth and future success for our central business district and our Capital City as we
encourage people to shop, dine and enterta in locally.
Addressing the parking issues in downtown is not just for right now. It ensures continued success
of this vital component of our community by providing the needed infrastructure as our community
grows . By utilizing funds that are collected through parking fees and fines, our community can
make a drastic improvement to an area of town without an addit ional impact to the city budget.
Thank you for your consideration,
Downtown Association Board of Directors
Natalie Newville , President
Mark Leesman, Treasurer
Angela Nale, Secretary
Sheila Smith , Past President
Lauren Moscato
Justin Duren
Gus Wagner
Matt Green
Cara Alexander Stark
Donaldson, Emily
From:
Sent
To:
Smith, Britt
Monday, August 1, 2022 3:01 PM
Donaldson, Emily; Morasch, Matt
Subject: Fwd: Parking Meters on Capitol Avenue
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flagged Flag Status:
FYI.
Britt E. Smith, P.E
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Griffin, Tia" <tgriffin@jeffersoncitymo.gov>
Date: August 1, 2022 at 3:52:05 PM EDT
To: "Smith, Britt" <bsmith@jeffersoncitymo.gov>
Subject: FW: Parking Meters on Capitol Avenue
See below.
From: Kay Stuefer <kaystuefer@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2022 2:14 PM
To: Griffin, Tia <tgriffin@jeffersoncitymo.gov>
Subject: Parking Meters on Capitol Avenue
I oppose the increase of $1 per hour and 10 hour meters on Capitol Avenue. As a member and volunteer
of the First United Methodist Church I am often at the church during daytime hours. As you know, we do
not have our own parking lot as other churches in the area do. Therefore I ( and many others) park on
Capitol Avenue while we are working/volunteering at the church. The increase would mean we would
have to pay $1 for each hour we are there or even $1 if we need to run into the church for 1D-15
minutes.
KayStuefer
1
Donaldson. Emily
From:
Sent
To:
Smith, Britt
Subject
Monday, August 1, 2022 3:00PM
Donaldson, Emily; Morasch, Matt
Fwd: Capitol Avenue parking meters
FYI.
Britt E. Smith, P.E
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Griffin, Tla" <tgriffin@jeffersoncitymo.gov>
Date: August 1, 2022 at 3:51:43 PM EDT
To: "Smith, Britt" <bsmith@jeffersoncitymo.gov>
Subject: FW: Capitol Avenue parking meters
See below.
From: ANN & BILL <amwemaxwel@cs.com>
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2022 1:56PM
To: Griffin, Tia <tgriffin@jeffersoncitymo.gov>
Subject: capitol Avenue parking meters
Your recommendation to increase the time allowed on parking meters in the 300 block
of E. Capitol and raise the rate to $1 an hour with be a huge determent for those who go
to the First Methodist Church on the comer of Monroe and E. Capitol. We have NO
PARKING LOT for the members of our church in which to park during a weekday. This
will cause great harm for those needing to attend meetings, services, and other
activities relating to the life of our church. It is not beneficial to the church to require our
members to pay $1 an hour for any attendance at church activities during the
week. Please consider NOT making these parking meter rate changes on Capitol
Avenue by our church. It would be helpful to allow for longer time to park, but the
additional cost is not worth it.
Thank you for your consideration of this request.
Ann Maxwell
1
Donaldson. Emily
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Donaldson, Emily
Thursday, July 28, 2022 1 :35 PM
Donaldson, Emily
FW: Concern regarding possible change to meter parking on E Capitol Ave.
From: "Steve Spradlin., <steveofashland@gmail.com>
To: "Michael & Laura Ward., <WardsinJeffCitv@mchsi.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2022 10:41:28 AM
Subject: Concern regarding possible change to meter parking on E capitol Ave.
1
Hi, Laura. My name is Steve Spradlin. My wife Claudia and I live at 1700 W Main St, Jefferson City, MO and I
also own and operate the successful massage therapy business "It's a Great Day", located at 227 E.
capitol Ave. just west of Monroe St., and adjacent to the little private lot for the Farmers
Insurance building. (My website, fyi, is www.itsagreatday-massagetherapy.com ). As I mentioned in my
text to you, I was unable to get access to email you directly via the City's website. I tried, but never was able
to get into the site's email software to send you a message ... and the City does not list the email addresses for
any of the Councilpersons. Phone numbers are provided ... hopefully the City can please add the actual email
addresses.
Laura, I am very concerned about a new issue regarding parking in the immediate vicinity of my business that
the City is considering. I know from past experience that having the support of a City Councilperson acting as
a benefactor and representative is both powerful and positive in communicating a citizen's concerns to City
officials during the decision making process so that a mutually beneficial outcome is achieved. So I
respectfully request your assistance in this matter, Laura!
Yesterday morning on local talk radio station 104.5, it was mentioned that the City is considering changing the
existing 2 hour maximum parking meters on E. Capitol to 10 hour maximum parking; and also raising the
parking fee to $1.00 per hour.
If the 200 E block of E. Capitol (Madison to Monroe) in which my business is located is included in
the region of E Capitol where the City is considering making this change, I am extremely
concerned that such a change would very likely have a devastating effect on my business -for
which my clients depend solely on available and affordable E capitol street parking for access to
my office while they come generally for 2 hour (or longer) time periods for the massage therapy
service and inddental necessary communication while at my office. Mine is a customer service
business that has customers throughout the day and evening, and for which immediate, available
and affordable street parking at any time of the work day is necessary.
However, if the City is considering ONLY the 100 E block for this change (Jefferson to Madison)
AND in front of the MoDOT office on capitol Ave west of Jefferson St., then I would not be
concerned. I think that would be a great idea for that limited location due to the immediate proximity to
State office buildings as well as the capitol Building where employees, lobbyists and others needing to
occasionally park long term would. most benefit; and other adjacent private businesses (such as mine) that are
in the 200 E block between Madison and Monroe would not see a devastating impact because their own
customers could still be assured of finding immediate street parking in front of those businesses.
As a business owner licensed with the City at this location for over 4 years, I am really the only
business on E. capitol in the downtown area that has customers continually throughout the day,
customers who all require access from E. capitol Ave, who must be able to find available and
immediately-adjacent parking at ANY time of the day for their scheduled sessions, and who also
need to park at the meters affordably for a FULL 2 hours in order to receive the services
provided by my massage therapy business. The current parking situation on the 200 E block of E Capitol
provides exactly that, and I have taught all my clients about how to schedule massage sessions so that they
will be able to park at the meters in front of my office without getting a ticket. Many of my clients schedule 2
hour sessions, so they have to park at the extended time parking meters on Monroe or Madison (north of E
capitol). Otherwise they are forced to park in the City garage (if parking there is available) and pay much
higher prices. Otherwise they come at 3:00 or after so they can pay the meter until it becomes free at 5:00.
The critical issue is that my customers all have appointments that are scheduled in advance (no walk-ins)
and they must be able to find immediate, available and affordable parking at my 227 E Capitol
office location in order to be on time for their scheduled appointment. Currently, that provision
exists with parking meters and costs as it now is with the 2 hours maximum per day/block restriction ... at 25
cents per hour. I selected my office address 4 years ago because of the downtown location. Even though my
3
customers all have to pay a reasonable parking fee at the meter In order to obtain my services, they all know
that they will always be able to find immediate and available affordable parking! Currently in the 200 E block
of E capitol, the parking situation for my customers is perfect.
Again, my concern is if metered locations along the 200 E block of E capitol are changed to allow long term
parking, I know that those places WILL become filled by all-clay parkers, and people coming to my business
will find that the Oty has purposely eliminated all available City short-term parking in support of long-term
parking (blocking potential customers from my business because they can't find short-term parking
nearby). All other parking in my vicinity are strictly-enforced private lots. Even the small Farmers Insurance
lot adjacent to my office is not available for parking for my single customers because the lot usage is restricted
to others in addition to Farmers Insurance's own allocated spaces. There is also no guarantee that any one of
my scheduled customers would be able to find parking in the City garage at any particular time of day. That
situation HAS happened before with some of my clients.
If that were to happen in the future with my customers and metered parking places near my office are filled
by all-clay parkers because of the City's decision to allow that, then It would not be fair for the City to just say
11too bad" if that decision were made in spite of concerns raised by my own Clty-Jicensed business whose
success or failure can be determined by that decision. Each year my own business in particular is seriously
impacted financially by numerous Oty-imposed 11 no parking for special event'', or the several day street
closures near my office for the Salute to America in which the entire carnival is set up In front of my office and
there is NO parking for several days for my customers in the vicinity during the period until all carnival
equipment is gone. I lose a lot of customers during those times and get no income as a result. My income is
customer-based, and my customers come throughout the day and evening; so if there is no parking, then I
can't have customers or income. The City does not allow massage therapists to "work remotely" from home,
as some of the other general offices along E Capitol might be able to do, so my ability to make business
income is entirely dependent upon the Oty's responsibility to ensure reasonable parking availability for
customers that wish to use my business. It is also important that parking needs for my individual business not
be ignored as my business is overlooked for the other extended street closures and special event parking
closures. At least, those events are temporary ••• but a change to the general parking policy is permanent.
I will mention that although there is a narrow parking lot behind my building, it is in all aspects unsuitable for
use by my clients -for a multitude of reasons regarding customer accessibility, restricted access via the rear
entrances, safely concerns, unusabillly during winter events, lot too narrow for unfamiliar drivers
entering/backing out of the lot between parked vehicles, frequent utility work in that area, and many other
reasons. It is strictly usable only for building tenants who live there -but not suitable for customers. I find
the rear parking arrangement so generally unusable that I myself rent monthly parking in the City garage.
Often, I also need to park at a meter in front of my office for 2 hours so that I can move things in/out of my
office. I pay 50 cents to be able to do that in front of my own office. Many of my clients have accessibility
issues and need to use the handicap metered parking immediately in front of my office. In short, my
customers require parking and entrance from E capitol.
Another option the Oty might consider is leaving parking meter arrangements in the 200 E block of E capitol
as they presently are, but increase the fines significantly for parking meter violations. I occasionally see some
expensive vehicles parked all day in front of my office with no money in the meter at all ••• also sometimes see
parking tickets littering the street Apparently those people don't care. Increased fines would bring in maybe
as much or more income than increased parking rates on E Capitol?
Thank you for letting me share my concerns with you, Laura! I am sure there Is a great solution that will be
beneficial both to my own business and customers and also for the City. I am hoping you will relay and
support my concems with the appropriate City officials and ask that they recognize that my
business is located there and depends on customers being able to easily and affordably park in
front of my office on E capitol. I know that your own action as a benefactor will create great
results. A similar situation happened in 2019 regarding parking on W Main in front of my own home where
4
the City had intended to eliminate all street parking in front of my home, creating a huge restriction and
inconvenience for us. As a retired engineer with MoDOT, I expressed my concerns and presented options, but
it appeared that the City was not going to make any concession for our benefit until our Coundlman at the
time, Rick Mihalevich, interceded during the public works meeting at which I was unsuccessfully presenting
.. my case .. , and by his involvement and recommendation was able to arrive at an agreement with the Oty for
one of my options at that time. Very impressive! I am confident that your assistance can get great results
too!
If there is anything I can do to assist you, or extra info you would like, please let me
know. Thank you, Laura!
Steve Spradlin
(816) 872-5605 (call or text)
home: 1700 W. Main, JCMO
business: It's a Great Day LLC, 227 E tapitol Ave, JCMO (same phone)
email: steveofashland@gmail.com
5
LAW OFFICES
BRYDON, SWEARENGEN & ENGLAND
DAVID V.G. BRYDON (1937·2012)
JAMES C. SWEARENGEN (Retired)
WILLIAM R. ENGLAND, III
JOHNNY K. RICHARDSON
CHARLES E. SMARR
DEAN L COOPER
GREGORY C. MITCHELL
Jefferson City Council
ATTN: Britt b. Smith, P.E.
Department of Public Works
320 E. McCarty St.
Jefferson City , MO 65101
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
312 EAST CAPITOL AVENUE
P.O. BOX 456
JEFFERSON CITY, N ISSOURI 65102·0<156
TELEPHONE (573) 635· 7166
FACSIMILE (573) 635·0427
July 26 , 2022
BRIAN T. ~1CCARTNEY
SCOTT A. HAMBLIN
JAMIE J. COX
ERIN L WISEMAN
STEPHEN A. REHAGEN
JENNIFER L. HERNANDEZ
JESSE W. CRAIG
MIKINZI (KINZI) C. HARVIS
Re: Proposed Increase in Parking Time Limit for J>arking Meters
To Whom It May Concern:
l am one of the owners of the Hammond Building located at 312 East Capito l Avenue,
Jefferson City Missouri. I have received COITespondence from tl1e City of Jeflerson regarding a
proposal to increase the parking time limit fi·om the current 2 or 4 hours to 10 hours for parking
meters located in the 300 E. Capitol Ave . block.
Please be advised that 1, and the other owners or the Hammond Building, are opposed to
this proposal. The Hammond Building houses several businesses primarily a law office , which
has transient vis its fi·om clients and other members of the public. We are concerned that
increasing the parking time limit to l 0 hours will encourage employees of other businesses to
monopolize the on-street parking , making it more difficult for clients and other members of the
public to conveniently access our onices.
If you have any questions regarding our position or would like to discuss more
thoroughly, you can contact me at the above address or telephone number.
Sincerely,
WJJjrTriJ
WRE/aw ru[E®lEuwrEm
lill JUL 2 8 202 2 ~
By
Memoran d um
320 East McCarty Street • Jefferson City, Missouri 65101 • P: 573.634 .6410 • F: 573.634.6562 • www .jeffersoncitymo .gov
Date : August 10, 2022
To: Public Works and Planning Committee
From:
Subject:
David Bange P.E., City Engineer '\)'"fn
High Street Viaduct
This memo provides and update on activities pertaining to the High Street Viaduct.
A question arose at last month's meeting concerning MoODT's connection to the bridge. Investigation
of the history confirmed that the section of High Street between Bolivar and Mulberry was, by signed
agreement with the City, taken over by the State Highway Commission who in turn helped with the
funding of the 1949 (current) bridge . In December of 1970 another agreement was signed within which
the Commission relinquished the rights given to them by the 1948 agreement.
A Request for Qualifications (RFQ) has been sent out for the design of a replacement for the High
Street Viaduct. The responses to that request are due back to the City on August 191h.
An engineering contract has been signed with Bartlett and West for the design of the repair to the
existing hole in the bridge deck and to provide further inspection of the bridge. Staff met with them on
Tuesday in conjunction with the contractor who has been selected to perform the repair. Details of the
repair where discussed as well as the means and methods that would be used by the contractor. It is
anticipated that the repair would take place sometime between the second week of September and the
end of October.
If you have any questions you may contact me at 634-6433.
U:\Public Works\Engineering\dbange\PUBLIC WORKS & PLANNING\2022\8 -2022\High Street Viaduct.docx
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
MEMORANDUM
Public Works & Planning Committee
Sonny Sanders, Planning & Protective Services Director
Rachel Senzee, Neighborhood Services Supervisor
July 14, 2022
Historic Legacy District Bill
The purpose of this bill is to allow the creation of Historic Legacy Districts. Once
enacted, the ordinance would formally recognize geographical areas of historical and
cultural significance that no longer exist. A Historic Legacy District will not contain land
use regulations, but will maintain the historical narrative of a significant area in
perpetuity.
This ordinance proposal was recommended by the Historic Preservation Code Revision
Committee and the Historic Preservation Commission .
Committee Request: Recommend moving bill to Council.
For questions or comments, please contact Rachel Senzee at
rsenzee@jeffersoncitymo .gov or 573-634-6305.
ARTICLE IV. PRESERVATION AND CONSERVATION
ARTICLE IV. PRESERVATION AND CONSERVATION
Sec. 8-41. Definitions.
Unless specifically defined herein, words or terms of this article shall be interpreted so as to give them the
same meaning as they have in common usage and so as to give this article its most reasonable application.
Adaptive use. The process of changing the use of a structure or property to a use other than that for which
the structure or property was originally designed or a use for a structure or property other than the use for which
it was originally designed. (Sometimes called "adaptive reuse").
Alteration. Any act or process that changes one or more of the exterior architectural features of a structure,
including, but not limited to, the erection, construction, reconstruction or removal of any structure.
Architectural attributes. Those physical features of buildings and structures that are generally identified and
described as being important products of human thought and action characteristic of a population or community.
Certified local government (CLG). A program of the National Park Service designed to promote the
preservation of prehistoric and historic sites, structures, objects, buildings and historic districts by establishing a
partnership between the local government, the State Historic Presentation Department and the National Park
Service. A certified local government carries out the purposes of the National Historic Preservation Act, as
amended. Each certified local government is required to maintain a system of ongoing surveys compatible with the
Missouri Historic Preservation Department process.
OHPC. The City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission.
Commissioners. Members of the City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission.
Consent. The vote as cast by owners holding majority interest in a parcel of real estate. For purposes of this
article, only one vote per parcel may be cast.
Conservation district. Any area designated by the OHPC in accordance with this section as an area containing
any physical features or improvements or both which are of historical, social, cultural, architectural or aesthetic
significance to the City and cause such area to constitute a distinctive section of the City. This overlay zone may be
used for areas which have distinctive characteristics that are worthy of conservation, but lack sufficient historical,
architectural or cultural significance to qualify as historic areas.
Contributing (or contributory). A significant building, site, structure or object which adds to the architectural
qualities, historic association or archeological value of an historic district because:
A. It was present during the pertinent historic time;
B. It possesses integrity and reflects its significant historic character or is capable of yielding important
information about the pertinent historic period; or
C. It independently meets the standards and criteria of this article.
Cultural attributes. All of the physical features of an area that, either independently or by virtue of their
interrelationship, are generally identified and described as being important products of human thought and action
characteristic of a population or community. Accordingly, the term "cultural attributes" necessarily includes
"architectural attributes" as that term is defined in this section. The term "cultural attributes" does not refer to the
characteristics or beliefs of people who may reside in or frequent a particular area.
Jefferson City, Missouri, Code of Ordinances
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 1 of6
Created: 2922-93-14 19:53:55 (EST]
Cultural resource. Districts, sites, structures, objects and evidence of some importance to a culture, a
subculture or community for scientific, engineering, art, tradition, religious or other reasons significant in providing
resources and environmental data necessary for the study and interpretation of past lifestyles, and for interpreting
human behavior .
Department. The Department of Planning and Protective Services of the City of Jefferson, Missouri.
Design criteria . A standard of appropriate activity that will preserve the historic and architectural character
of a structure or area.
Designation. Official recognition of an historic landmark, conservation or historic district by the City Council
according to the procedures and provisions in this article.
Director. The Director of the Department of Planning and Protective Services, or his or her designee.
Endangered resource. A resource under a known or anticipated threat of damage to the integrity or
existence of the resource, such as:
A. An immediate threat which will result in loss of or collapse of a structure;
B. An immediate threat or destruction by private action; or
C. Condemnation for code violations .
(Sometimes referred to as a "threatened resource").
Exterior architectural appearance . The architectural character and general composition of the exterior of a
structure, including but not limited to the kind, color and texture of the building material and the type, design and
character of all windows, doors, light fi xtures, signs, and appurtenant elements.
Facade. The exterior face of a building which is the architectural front, sometimes distinguished by
elaboration or architectural or ornamental details.
Historic district. An area designated as an historic district by ordinance of the City Council and which may
contain within definable geographic boundaries one or more significant sites, structures or objects, and which may
have within its boundary's other properties or structures that, while not of such historic and/or architectural
significance to be designated as landmarks, nevertheless to the overall virtue characteristics of the significant sites,
structures or objects located within the historic district.
Historic legacy district. A geographical area of historical and cultural significance for which most of all of the
physical attributes (structures, streets, public areas, archeological etc .) relevant to the historical or cultural period
of significance no longer exist.
Historic preservation. The study, identification, protection, restoration and rehabilitation of buildings,
structures, objects, districts, areas and sites significant in the history, architecture, archeology or culture of the
City, State or nation.
Historically or architecturally significant. Possessing that quality present in an area, site, structure, object or
district because it :
A. Is associated with an event or events that significantly contributed to the broad patterns of the history
or architectural heritage of the City, County, State or nation;
B. Is associated with the life or lives of a person or persons significant in the history of the City, County,
State or nation;
C. Embodies distinctive characteristics of a type, design , period or method of construction;
D. Represents the work of a master designer or architect or possesses high architectural value;
E. Exemplifies the cultural, political, economic, social or historic heritage of the City;
Cr eated: 2822-83 -14 18 :5 3 :55 [EST)
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 2 of 6
F. Contains elements of design, detail, material or craftsmanship which represent a significant
construction innovation;
G. Is part of or related to a square, park or other distinctive area that was or should be developed or
preserved according to a plan based on an historic or architectural motif;
H. Is an established and familiar visual feature of a neighborhood or the entire community; or
I. Has yielded, or is likely to yield archeological artifacts and/or information.
Key contributing. A site, structure or object of such an outstanding quality and state of conservation that it
significantly adds to the architectural qualities, historic association or archeological values of an historic district
because:
A. It was present during the pertinent historic time;
B. It possesses and reflects its significant historic character or is capable of yielding important information
about the pertinent historic period; and
C. It independently meets the standards and criteria of the article.
Landmark. A site, structure or object designated as a landmark by ordinance of the City Council, pursuant to
procedures prescribed herein, that is worthy of rehabilitation, restoration and preservation because of its historic
and/or architectural significance to the City.
Landscape feature. Any element or component of outdoor open space including, but not limited to, fences,
walls, retaining walls, gates, sidewalks, walkways, driveways, parking lots, patios, terraces, decks, ground cover,
trees, plants, outdoor furniture, exterior light standards, fountains, statuary, detached signs, and other such
elements.
Local historic district. A historic district established in accordance with Chapter 8, Article IV of the City Code.
Marker. A sign used to label or identify a designated landmark or historic district as an architecturally
significant property.
National Register. The current National Register of Historic Places established by passage of the National
Historic Preservation Act of 1966, 80 Stat. 915, 16 U.S.C. 470 et seq. as amended.
Noncontributing (or noncontributory). A site, structure or object that does not add to the architectural
qualities, historic association or archeological values of a landmark or historic district because:
A. It was not present during the pertinent time;
B. Due to alterations, disturbances, additions or other changes, it no longer possesses integrity nor
reflects its significant historic character or is incapable of yielding important information about the
pertinent historic period; or
C. It does not independently meet the standards and criteria of the ordinance.
Normal maintenance and repair. Any improvement or work for which a building permit is not required by
City ordinance designed to correct deterioration, decay or damage and restore, as may be practical, a structure or
property to the condition that existed prior to the deterioration, decay or damage.
Notable structure. A structure found to be notable per the review criteria listed in subsection 8-43.G.
Object. Those physical items that have functional, aesthetic, cultural, historical or scientific value and are
relatively small in scale and simply constructed. While an object may be, by nature or design, movable, it should be
located in a specific setting or environment appropriate to its significant historic use, role or character. Objects
include sculptures, monuments, street signs, fence posts, hitching posts, mileposts, boundary markers, statuary
and fountains.
Created: 2022-03-14 10:53:55 [EST)
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 3 of6
Owner(s) of record. Those individuals, partnerships, firms, corporations, public agencies or any other legal
entity holding title to property, but not including legal entities holding mere easements or leasehold interests.
(May also be referred to as "property owner(s)"). Current owner(s) of record are those listed as owners on the
records with the Cole County Recorder of Deeds.
Period. A chronological division identified in the analysis of the historical development to an area or region
(i.e., Victorian, Modern).
Protection. The application of measures to defend, guard, cover or shield a building, site, structure or object
from deterioration, loss, attack, danger, or injury. In the case of buildings, structures or objects such measures
generally are of a protective nature and usually precede preservation measures. In the case of archeological sites,
the protective measures may be temporary or permanent.
Reconstruction/reconstruct. The reproduction of the exact form and detail of a vanished building, site,
structure or object or a part thereof, as it appeared at a pertinent time using both original and modern materials
and based on precise historical documentation and physical evidence.
Rehabilitation/rehabilitate. The act of returning a site, structure or object to a useful state through its repair
and/or alteration while retaining the characteristic features of the property which are significant to its historical
and architectural value.
Remodeling. Modification and modernization of a structure or property without striving to return to or
replicate the original historical and architectural character of the structure or property.
Removal. Any relocation of a structure in whole or in part on its site or to another site.
Repair. Any change to a structure or object that is not construction, removal or alteration.
Resource. Any site, structure, object or area that constitutes a source of present and future usefulness.
Restoration/restore. The act of accurately recovering the form and details, based on precise historical
documentation and physical evidence, of a building, site, structure or object as it appeared at a pertinent time
including the removal of improvements that are not appropriate and the replacement of missing or deteriorated
features.
Site. The location of a significant event, a prehistoric or historic occupation or activity, or a building or
structure, whether standing, ruined or vanished, where the location itself possesses historic, cultural or
archeological value regardless of the value of any existing structure. Examples of sites include habitation sites,
burial sites, village sites, hunting and fishing sites, ceremonial sites, battlefields, ruins of historic buildings and
structures, campsites, designed landscapes, natural textures, springs and landscapes having cultural significance.
Stable. The area is expected to remain substantially the same over the next 20-year period with continued
maintenance of the property. While some changes in structures, land uses and densities may occur, all such
changes are expected to be compatible with surrounding development.
Stabilizing. The area is expected to become stable over the next 20-year period through continued
reinvestment, maintenance or remodeling.
Standards. The Secretary of Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties, codified as 36 CFR
68 in the July 12, 1995 Federal Register (Vol. 60, No. 133), and as revised from time to time.
Structure. Anything constructed or erected, the use of which requires permanent or temporary location on
or in the ground, including, but without limiting the generality of the foregoing: buildings, fence, gazebos,
advertising signs, billboards, backstops for tennis courts, radio and television antennas, including supporting
towers and swimming pools.
~The specific identifying characteristics of a building both as it appears to the eye and as it is known to
exist in design and structure.
Created: 2022-03-14 10:53:55 [EST]
(Supp. No. 11)
Page4of6
Survey. An architectural and historical examination of historic resources to identify historic prope r ties within
an area.
(Ord . No. 12794, Appendix A, 8-17-98, Ord. No . 15760, § 3, 1-03-18)
Sec. 8-42 . Surveys and resea rch .
The City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission (CJHPC), as created by section 7-51 of the City Code,
shall undertake an ongoing survey and research effort in the City of Jefferson to identify neighborhoods, areas,
sites , structures, and objects that have historic cultural, archaeological , architectural or aesthetic importance,
interest or value as part of the survey, and shall review and evaluate any prior surveys and studies by any unit of
government or private organization and compile appropriate descriptions, facts, and photographs . The CJHPC shall
systematically identify potentiallandmarks,historic districts, and historic legacy districts and adopt procedures to
nominate them based upon the following criteria :
A. The potentiallandmarks,historic districts, and historic legacy districts which are in an identifiable
neighborhood or distinct geographical area which have historic and/or cultural importance to the City;
B. The potentiallandmark,historic districts, and historic legacy districts are associated with a particular
prominent person, a significant event, or a historical period;
C. The potentiallandmarks,historic districts, and historic legacy districts ex hibit a particular architectural
style or school , or are associated with a particular architect, engineer, builder, designer, or craftsman ;
D. The potentiallandmarks,historic districts, and historic legacy districts contain hi storic, prehistoric, and
archaeological features , evidence , and/or artifacts which have the potential to contribute to the
understanding of historic and prehistoric cultures ; or
E. Such other criteria as may be adopted by the CJHPC to assure the systematic survey and nomination of
all potential landmarks, historic districts, and historic legacy districts within the City.
(Ord . 13251, 8-20-2001; Ord. 14088, § 2, 8-7-2006)
Sec. 8-48. Historic Legacy Dis t rict s.
A. Application/Nomination . Applications to establish a historic legacy district shall be made On forms
avai lable at the office of the Department of Planning and Protective Services . Applications must be
submitted to the Department; the Department shall forward applications to the CJHPC. Each historic
legacy district must be nominated by a separate application .. The designation of a historic legacy districtj
sha ll in no way alter the uses permitted by existing zoning, land us e, or future development of the
property so designated .
B. Notice. Upon receipt of an application to establish a historic legacy district, the Department shall notify by
f irst class mail the property owners within the proposed historic legacy district of the application of a
public heari ng before the CJHPC where all interested persons shall be allowed to appear and be heard .
Such notice shall be mailed at least fifteen days prior to the publ ic hearing .
C. Criteria . The CJHPC shall utilize the following criteria to establish a historic legacy district:
Cr e ate d: 2e22-e3-14 l e :S3 :55 [ES T]
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 5 of 6
1. Most of all of the physical attributes (structures, streets, public areas, archeology, etc.) relevant to the
historical or cultural period of significance no longer exist; and at tleast one the following three criteria:
a. Its character, interest, or value as part of the development, heritage, or cultural characteristics of
the community, county, state, or nation; or
b . Its location as a site of a significant local, county, state, or national event; or
c. Its identification with a person or persons who significantly contributed to the development of
the community, county, state, or nation .
D. Recommendation by OHPC. After the public hearing, OHPC shall vote to make a recommendation as to
whether a historic legacy district shall be established and such recommendation shall be forwarded to the City
Council.
E. Action by the City Council. After receipt of a recommendation from OHPC, the City Council may establish a
Historic Legacy District by ordinance. Each historic legacy district must be etablished by a separate ordinance.
The City Council may return an application to the OHPC for further hearings, debate, or investigation.
F. Effect of Historic Legacy District on Included Properties. The establishment of a Historic Legacy District shall in
no way alter the uses permitted by existing zoning, land use, or future development of the propert(ies) so
included within such district.
G. Expansion of an established historic legacy district. Once a historic legacy district is established by ordinance
under this section, such historic legacy district may be expanded upon application of the owners of record of
parcels seeking to be added to an established historic legacy district. Such additional parcels shall be within
reasonable proximity to, and share historical and cultural characteristics in common with the historic legacy
district sought to be expanded . Applications to expand a historic district shall be reviewed under the same
criteria set forth in subsection C above and under the same procedures applicable to the original
establishment of a historic district. A historic legacy district may only be expanded by ordinance.
Cr eated : 2022 -0 3 -14 10 :53 :55 [EST]
(Supp . No . 11)
Page 6 of 6
ARTICLE IV . PRESERVAT ION AND CONS ERVATI ON
ARTICLE IV. PRESERVATION AND CONSERVATION
See. 8 U, QefiRitioRSo
YAiess s~eeifieally 8efiAe8, wares er terFAs iA seetieA g 48 sf tRis artiEie sRall ~e iAter~rete8 sa as te gi"e
tReFA tRe saFAe FAeaAiAg as tRey Rave iA EBFAFASA ~sage a As sa as te give tRis artiEie its FA est reaseAaele
a~~lieatieA.
Sec. 8-41. Definitions.
Unless specifically defined her ein , words or terms of this article shall be interpreted so as to give them the
same meaning as they have in common usage and so as to give this article its most reasonable application .
Adaptive use. The process of changing the use of a structure or property to a use other than that for which
the structure or property was originally designed or a use for a structure or property other than the use for which
it was originally designed. (Sometimes called "adaptive reuse ").
Alteration . Any act or process that changes one or more of the exterior architectura l features of a structure,
including, but not limited to, the erection, construction , reconstruction or removal of any structure.
Architectural attributes. Those physical features of buildings and structures that are generally identified and
described as being important products of human thought and action characteristic of a population or community.
Certified local government (CLG). A program of the National Park Service designed to promote the
preservation of prehistoric and historic sites. structures. objects. buildings and historic districts by establishing a
partnership between the local government. the State Historic Presentation Department and the National Park
Service. A certified local government carries out the purposes of the National Historic Preservation Act. as
amended . Each certified local government is required to maintain a system of ongoing surveys compatible with the
Missouri Historic Preservation Department process .
CJHPC. The City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission .
Commissioners. Members of the City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission .
Consent. The vote as cast by owners holding majority interest in a parcel of real estate . For purposes of this
article, only one vote per parcel may be cast.
Conservation district. Any area designated by the CJHPC in accordance with this section as an area containing
any physical features or improvements or both which are of historical, social. cultural, architectural or aesthetic
significance to the City and cause such area to constitute a distinctive section of the City . This overlay zone may be
used for areas which have distinctive characteristics that are worthy of con se rvation, but lack sufficient historical,
architectural or cultural significance to qualify as historic areas.
Contributing (or contributory). A significant building, site, structure or object which adds to the architectural
qualities, historic association or archeological va lue of an historic district because :
A. It was present during the pertinent historic time;
B. It possesses integrity and reflects its significant historic character or is capable of yielding important
information about the pertinent historic period: or
C. It independently meets the standards and criteria of this article.
Jefferson City , M issou ri , Code of Ordin ances
(Supp . No . 11)
Page 1 of 14
created: 2022-eJ-14 10:53:55 [EST]
Cultural attributes . All of the physical features of an area t hat. either independently or by virtue of their
interrelationship, are generally identified and described as being important products of human thought and action
characteristic of a population or community. Accordingly, the term "cultural attributes" necessarily includes
"architectural attributes" as that term is defined in this section . The term "cultural attributes" does not refer to the
characteristics o r beliefs of people who may reside in or frequent a particular area.
Cultural resource . Districts, sites, structures, objects and evidence of some importance to a cu lture, a
subcu lture or community for scientific, eng in eering, art. tradition, religious or other reasons significant in providing
resources and environmental data necessary for the study and in terpretation of past lifestyles, and for interpreting
human behavior.
Departm ent. The Department of Planning and Protective Services of the City of Jefferson, Missouri.
Design criteria. A standard of appropriate activity that will preserve the historic and architectural character
of a structure or area.
Designation . Official recognition of an historic landmark, conservation or historic district by the City Council
according to the procedures and provisions in this article.
Director. The Director of the Department of Planning and Protective Services, or his or her designee.
Endangered resource. A resource under a known or anticipated threat of damage to the integrity or
existence of the resource, such as:
A. An immediate threat which will result in loss of or collapse of a structure:
B. An immediate threat or destruction by private action ; or
C. Condemnation for code violations.
(Sometimes referred to as a "threatened resource").
Exterior architectural appearance . The architectural character and general composition of the exterior of a
structure, includ ing but not limited to the kind , color and texture of the building material and the type, design and
character of all windows, doors, light fixtures, signs, and appurtenant elements.
Facade . The exterior face of a building which is the architectural front. sometimes distinguished by
elaboration or architectural or ornamental details .
Historic district. An area des ignated as an historic district by ordinance of the City Council and which may
contain within defi nable geographic boundaries one or more significant sites, structures or objects, and which may
have within its boundary's other properties or stru ctures that. while not of such historic and/or architectural
signif icance to be designated as landmarks, nevertheless to the overall virtue characteristics of the significant sites,
structures or ob jects located within the historic district.
Historic legacy distric1.-·.geographical area of historical an d cul tu ral si gni fi cance for which most of all ol
[t;;"ohvsical attributes (structures streets oublic areas ar ch eoloei cal et c.l rel evan t to the historical or cu lturaf
\,eri od of sienificance no longer exi st.l
Historic preservation. The study, identification, protection, restoration and rehabilitation of buildings,
structures, objects, districts, areas and sites significant in the history, architecture, archeology or culture of the
C1ty, State or nat1on .
Historically or architecturally significant. Possessing that qua li ty present in an area, site, structure, object or
district because it:
A. Is associated with an event or events that significantly contributed to the broad patterns of the history
or architectural heritage of the City, County, State or nation:
Created: 2022-03 ·14 Hl:53:55 [EST]
(Supp. No. 11)
Pa ge 2 of 14
~ Formatted: Highlight
Formatted: Highlight
~ Formatted: Highlight
Formatted: Highlight
B. Is associated with the life or lives of a person or persons significant in the history of the City. County,
State or nation;
C. Embodies distinctive characteristics of a type, design, period or method of construction;
D. Represents the work of a master designer or architect or possesses high architectural value;
E. Exemplifies the cultural. political, economic, social or historic heritage of the City;
F. Contains elements of design, detail, material or craftsmanship which represent a significant
construction innovation:
G. Is part of or related to a square, park or other distinctive area that was or should be developed or
preserved according to a plan based on an historic or architectural motif;
H. Is an established and familiar visual feature of a neighborhood or the entire community; or
Has yielded, or is likely to yield archeological artifacts and/or information.
Key contributing. A site, structure or object of such an outstanding quality and state of conservation that it
significantly adds to the architectural qualities. historic association or archeological values of an historic district
because:
A. It was present during the pertinent historic time;
B. It possesses and reflects its significant historic character or is capable of yielding important information
about the pertinent historic period; and
C. It independently meets the standards and criteria of the artic le.
Landmark . A site, structure or object designated as a landmark by ordinance of the City Council. pursuant to
procedures prescribed herein, that is worthy of rehabilitation, restoration and preservat ion because of its historic
and/or architectural significance to the City.
Landscape feature. Any element or component of outdoor open space including, but not limited to, fences,
walls, retaining walls, gates, sidewalks, walkways, driveways, parking lots, patios, terraces. decks, ground cover,
trees, plants, outdoor furniture, exterior light standards, fountains, statuary, detached signs, and other such
elements.
Local historic district. A historic district established in accordance with Chapter 8, Article IV of the City Code.
Marker. A sign used to label or identify a designated landmark or historic distr ict as an architecturally
significant property.
National Register . The current National Register of Historic Places estab lished by passage of the National
Historic Preservation Act of 1966, 80 Stat. 915, 16 U.S.C. 470 et seq. as amended.
Noncontributing (or noncontributory). A site, structure or object that does not add to the architectural
qualities, historic association or archeological values of a landmark or historic district because:
A. It was not present during the pertinent time;
B. Due to alterations, disturbances, additions or other changes, it no longer possesses integrity nor
reflects its significant historic character or is incapable of yielding important information about the
pertinent historic period; or
C. It does not independently meet the standards and criteria of the ordinance .
Normal maintenance and repair . Any improvement or work for which a building permit is not required by
City ordinance designed to correct deterioration, decay or damage and restore , as may be practical, a structure or
property to the condition that existed prior to the deterioration, decay or damage .
Created: 2022-03-14 10:53:55 [EST]
(Supp . No . 11)
Page 3 of 14
Notable structure. A structure found to be notable per the review criteria listed in subsection 8-43.G.
Object. Those physical items that have functional , aesthetic, cultural , historical or scientific value and are
relatively sma ll in scale and simply constructed. While an object may be, by nature or design, movable, it should be
located in a specific setting or environment appropriate to its significant historic use, role or character. Objects
include scu lptures. monuments, street signs , fence posts, hitching posts, mileposts , boundary markers, statuary
and fountains.
Owner(s) of record. Those individuals, partnerships, firms, corporations, public agencies or any other legal
entity holding title to property, but not including legal entities holding mere easements or leasehold interests .
(May also be referred to as "property owner(s)"). Current owner(sl of record are those listed as owners on the
records with the Cole Countv Recorder of Deeds .
Period. A chronological division identified in the analysis of the historical development to an area or region
(i.e., Victorian, Modern).
Protection . The application of measures to defend, guard, cover or shield a building, site . structure or object
from deterioration, loss, attack, danger, or injury. In the case of buildings, structures or objects such measures
generally are of a protective nature and usually precede preservation measures . In the case of archeological sites ,
the protective measures may be temporary or permanent.
Reconstruction/reconstruct. The reproduction of the exact form and detail of a vanished building, site,
structure or object or a part thereof. as it appeared at a pertinent time using both origin al and modern materials
and based on precise historical documentation and physical evidence .
Rehabilitation/rehabilitate. The act of returning a site. structure or object to a useful state through its repair
and/or alteration while retaining the characteristic features of the property which are significant to its historical
and architectural value .
Remodeling. Modification and modernization of a structure or property without striving to return to or
replicate the original historical and architectural character of the structure or property.
Removal. Any relocation of a structure in whole or in part on its site or to another site .
Repair. Any change to a structure or object that is not construction, removal or alteration .
Resource. Any site , structure, object or area that constitutes a source of present and future usefulness.
Restoration/restore. The act of accurately recovering the form and details, based on precise historical
documentation and physical evidence, of a building, site, structure or object as it appeared at a pertinent time
including the removal of improvements that are not appropriate and the replacement of missing or deteriorated
features .
Site. The location of a significant event, a prehistoric or historic occupation or activity, or a building or
structure. whether standing, ruined or vanished, where the location itself possesses historic, cultural or
archeological value regardless of the value of any existing structure. Examples of sites include habitation sites.
burial sites. village sites. hunting and fishing sites, ceremonial sites, battlefields. ruins of historic buildings and
structures. campsites. designed landscapes. natural textures, springs and landscapes having cultural significance.
Stable . The area is expected to remain substantially the same over the next 20-year period with continued
maintenance of the property. While some changes in structures. land uses and densities may occur. all such
changes are expected to be compatible with surrounding development.
Stabilizing. The area is expected to become stable over the next 20-year period through continued
reinvestment, maintenance or remodeling .
Standards. The Secretary of Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties, codified as 36 CFR
68 in the July 12. 1995 Federal Register (Vol. 60, No. 133). and as revised from time to time.
Created: 2022-03-14 10:53:55 [EST]
(Supp. No. 11)
Pa ge 4 of 14
Structure. Anything constructed or erected. the use of which requires permanent or temporary location on
or in the ground . including, but without limiting the genera lity of the foregoing : bui ldings, fence, gazebos,
advertis in g signs, billboards. backstops for tennis courts , rad io and television antennas . including supporting
towers and swimming pools.
Style. The specific identifying characteristic s of a building both as it appears to the eye and as it is known to
exist in des ig n and structure.
Survey. An architectural and historical examination of historic resources to identify historic properties within
an area .
(Ord . No. 12794, Appendix A. 8-17-98, Ord . No. 15760. § 3, 1-03-18)
Sec. 8-42. Surveys and research.
The City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission (CJHPC), as created by section 7-51 of th e City Code,
shall undertake an ongoing survey and research effort in the City of Jefferson to identify neighborhoods, areas,
sites, structures ,and objects that have historic cultural, archaeological, architectural or aesthetic importance,
interest or value as part of the survey, and shall review and evaluate any prior surveys and studies by any unit of
government or private organization and compile appropriate descriptions, facts , and photographs. The CJHPC shall
systematically identify potentiallandmarks ,~istoric districts. and historic legacy districts and adopt procedures
to nominate them based upon the following criteria:
A. The potentiallandmarks ,~istoric districts, and historic legacy districts which are in an identifiable
neighborhood or distinct geographical area which have historic and/or cultural importance to the City;
B. The potentiallandmark ,~istoric districts . and historic legacy districts are associated with a
particular prominent person, a significant event, or ~hi stor ical period;
C. The potentiallandmarks ,~istoric districts, and historic legacy districts exhibit a particular
architectural style or school, or are associated with a particular architect, engineer, build er, designer ,
or craftsman;
D. The potentiallandmarks ,~istoric di stricts . and historic legacy districts contain historic, prehistoric,
and archaeological features, evidence, and/or artifacts which have the potential to contribute to the
understanding of hi storic and prehistoric cultures; or
E. Such other criteria as may be adopted by the UHPC to assure the systematic survey and nomination of
all potential laAamarl<s a As t.isteric landmarks, historic districts . and historic legacy distr icts within the
City.
(Ord. 13251, 8-20-2001; Ord. 14088, § 2, 8-7-2006)
Sec. 8 -48. Nern i nat:en ef Historic U egacy De istricts.
A. Application/Nomination. Applications 'era :~O A ll!l a tioA a' a to establish a historic legacy district sha ll be
made to the CJHP ..., ,On f~orms :A:l _<te(a csr f 'S ~:i--:a~io:l
·::i l ~ be A'G~e available at the office of the Department of Planning and Protective Se rvices. App li cations
must be submitted to the Department; t he Department sha ll forward app li cations to the CJHP C. Each
historic legacy district must be nominated by a separate app li cation. Lo:!l l~is:aric !e gac·; aistr 'E" Fnc ·s: b:
Created: 2022-03-14 10:53:55 [EST ]
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 5 of 14
:!cs i ;Az~::! b y a s:paratc c~din a :>::. The designation of a historic legacy district sha ll in no way alter the
uses permitted by ~xistin g zon ing . la nd use . or fu ture development~ of the property so
designated.
B. Notice. Upon receipt of an application ~to establish a historic legacy district. the Department shall notify
bv f irst class ma il the property owners with in the proposed historic legacy district of the app li cation.,
orraA ;c fa~ a :imc ana e!a -: of a ·-:-::t>R ;;. a of a pu blic hea1 1ng befo re the CJHPC~ w here all
i nterested persons sh all be all owed to appear and be heard. Such not1ce shall be m ailed at leas t f 1ft een
davs o rior to the public hear ing.
Criteria . 'er RSm'Ra ·1en . The CJHPC shall util 1ze the fo ll owing cr iteria fo · no -:na:'eR sral! csn!·,· to
a p s ';c::::·~: ~s ~ tl=1:: d: .. =r;·'a:=o ... octo esta blish a historic legacy distr ict ::-:'-:: CJ!!~C :'~a!'. ::f:::-su:h
iAves~i:at:or :sit E:leem: nec:ssa:·.·. Au !;e a d:te rA=tinat is A as ta ·,•.h2tRer aA ?.rca atnlifics fer ne ffi i·ntion
e:;rs ~:a:--.t to th: ~ol!o·:::n: cri:c:-:a:
1. Most of all of the phys ica l attributes (structures. streets. public areas. archeology, etc.) relevant to the
historical or cultural period of significance no longer exist: and a t t least one t he fo llow 1ng th ree cr it e1 ia ·
~Its character. interest. or value as part of the development. heritage. or cu ltu ra l
characteristics of the community, county, state. or nation: or
b .~ Its location as a site of a significant lo ca l, county, state, or nationa l event: or
-Its identification with a person or persons who significantly contributed to the
deve lopment of the community, cou nty, state, or nation.
D. ~Recommendation bv U HPC• Afte1 the oublic hea r ing CJHPl shall make vote to make a
recommendation as to whether a historicfflE± legacv district shall.em++± he established and such
recommendat ion sha ll b e forwarded to the Citv Council.{\ ~~ ... j ··o" ~~: c •unc t .... _!en/ .. , ar p 'i ~a::'"'P 'a'
A8Aliqatien '112\ Be apse:~e8 ta :!-:e e !a n:'i ~;:; a:--d zsn1.-:;; E G i~i:·ss ic P ·~ J ::~r dc:;·:c :. tR th: sr :;·.;sL .... ?s s!
• -----1 Formatted: Space Before: 0 pt After: 0 pt Numbered
+ Level: 1 + Numbering Style: A, B, C, ... +Start at: 1 +
Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.25" + Indent at: 0.5''
• --(Formatted: Indent: Left: 1 ",Hanging: 0.5"
•--( Formatted: Ind ent: Left: 1"
( Formatted: Indent: Left: 1 ", Hanging: 0.5''
~--Formatted: No underline ~~~~~~------------~ ~ Formatted: No underline ,~~~~~~~~~----------------~
Formatted: No underline
E.
• --( Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.5'', No bu ll ets or
Action by the Cit y Co uncil. L)fter rece1 ptof a recommenda_t1on from CJHPC, tl1e C1tv Counc il mav establish (
a Historic Le gacv Di stri ct bv ordi nance . Each historic leeac y district must be etablished bv a separate '--_Fo----rm....:..a_:.tt_:,e_:,d_:_N_o:._:_u_:,n_:,d_e_rl _in_e ___________ _
ord 1n ance . The Citv Co un cilmav return an apolicat1on to the CJHPC f01 fl!lther heari ng s. debate. or
investigatio n.
F. Effect of Historic Legacv District on Included ProPel t ies. The establ•shment of a Histone Legacv District
shall in no wav alter the uses pe r mitted bv existinP zoninP. land use. or fut Jle develooment of the
propert(iesl so included within such district.
G. Expansion of an established historic legacy district. Once a historic legacy district is estab li shed by
o rd inance under th is sect ion, suc h hi storic legacy district may be expanded !;¥u pon app li catio n of th e
owners of record of parcels seek ing to be added to an established historic legacy district. Such addi t iona l
oarcels shall be within reasonab le orox imitv to. and share historical and cu ltural character istics in
·-j Formatted: No underline
Formatted: Underline
Formatted: Ind ent: Left: 0", Hanging : 0.33", Space
Before: 2 pt After: 6 pt No bullets or numbering
Formatted: Underline
-Formatted: No underline
co m mo n with the hi storic legacv d istrict SOl-f ght to be exoancled SHch aElEiitieRal sar :e!s :I• all a e '.'.'rtl';n ---(Formatted: No underline
r:asoRab!e sreJ<.ffi '~·; :a . an:' sloa~c 'nte·ieal aRd e"ltdd chacacte•'st :s 1n ceH>q,an • ·itA , tRe esta~lbhcs '----------------------_J
Ais:cric le ;::a:y ais:-ict. '"'REA 3 .1 areJ ce -ta 'Ring ten Sf m ere PGF E2 1S scel-s ta ae ·saeEi to an estall l i:h cEi
h!s~o:-ic !e ga:v erstr::t. tRc as:!icat:GR sRall CS.ltaiR at !cast '5 cor ".::.' .. 0 ,:: all a· 'ACF ~ e' reccr9 ot tRc
Created: 2022-03-14 10:53:55 (EST]
(Supp . No . 11)
Pag e 6 of 14
ea·cels se:'"'ng te ae ad:J:d ~= t!~c cst:slish:s his tar ic 'cg.~:·; Elist; ':t. Applications to expand a historic
district shall be reviewed under the same criteria set forth in subsection C above and under the same
procedures app licable to the original establishment of a historic district. A historic legacy district ~
..,;may on lv -be expanded "nti!"n!ess aaare•,es by ordinance .
Created: 2022·03-14 10:53:55 (EST)
(S u pp . No. 11)
Pa ge 7 of 14
SeE 8 48, QefiRitieR5o
URiess 5f!eEifiEally 9efiRe9 we res er terms ef this artiEie shall be iRterf!retee 59 as te gi"e .--lr:;---:-:--:-::--:-. -----------~
them the same meaR· til L • • (Formatted: Sect1on _mg asey Have IR eemmeR usage aRe seas te give this artiEie ~--.:..:.:.~.:.::.::.:..:._ __________ _j
1ts mest reaseRable 3flfllieatieR.
Aeapti•Je U5e The f!r9Ee5S ef Ella . til f -~RgiRge usee a struEture er f!rBf!erty tea 11se ether thaR
that fer wh1Eh the struEture er f!ref!erty was erigiRally eesigRee era use fer a
struEture er f!ref!erty ether thaR the use fer whiEh it was erigiRall·· eesigRee.
(Semetimes Eallee "adaf!tive reuse"),
1
!'lteratieR "R' a t L vo {E er f!rBEess tHat EhaRges eRe er mere ef the el<terier arEhiteEtllral features
ef a struEture, iREiueiRg, but Ret limited te, the ereEtieR, EBRstriiEtieR,
reEeRstriiEtieR er remeval ef aRy struEture.
ArEhiteEtllral attributes These fill" · 1 f f · · . . .·:1s1eaeatures ebullemgs aRe struEtures that are geRerally
1EieRtlf1ee_ a~e eesenbee as beiRg imf!ertaRt f!reeuEts ef humaR theught aRe aetieR
Eharaetenst1e ef a f!BflulatieR er eemmuRit•r·
Certified leEal geverRmeRt (Cb<O). A f!regram ef the NatieRal Park SeP'iEe eesigRee te
f!r~m.ete the f!reservatieR ef f!rehisteriE aRe histeriE sites, striiEtllres, ebjeEts,
b1111El1Rgs aRe histeriE eistriEts by establishiRg a f!artRershif!betweeR the leEal
ge·;erRmeRt, the State l-listeriE PreseRtatieR Def!artmeRt aRe the NatieRal p 1
S . " f ar < ~rviE~. vo eertiiee leEal geverRmeRt Earries e11t the f!Urf!eses ef the NatieRal
l-llster.IE P~eservatieR AEt, as ameR9e9. liaeh eertifiee leEal geverRmeRt is relluiree
te ma1Rta1R a system ef eRgeiRg sllrve•ts EBmf!atible "'ith the Misseuri l-listeriE
PreservatieR Def!artmeRt f!reEess.
Clio! PC. The City ef JefferseR l-listeriE PreservatieR CemmissieR
CemmissieRers. Members ef the City ef JefferseR l-listeriE PreservatieR CemmissieR.
CeR5eRt. The vete as east by ewRers heleiRg majerity iRterest iRa f!arEel ef real estate. r;er
f!Urf!eses ef thi s artiEie, eRiy eRe ·;ete f!er f!areel may be East.
Creat ed: 2022-03-14 10:53:55 [EST]
(Supp. No. 11)
Pa ge 8 of 14
CoRservatioR Elistri~, ~R'( area ElesigRatea by the CJ~PC iR aEEOraaREe 'Nith this seEtioR as aR
area EORtaiRIRg aR" ph"SiEal f t · . .,,ea wres or lmpro•JemeRts or both w hiEh are of
h1stoneal, soeial, ewltwral, arEhiteetwral or aesthetie sigRifieaREe to the Cit" aRe h ,
eawse SllE area to EORstitwte a aistiRetive seetioR of the City . This overla" zoRe ma"
be wsea for areas whieh have aistiRetive EharaEteristies that are '"'orth" :f 1
EORs.er"atio.R, bwt lael< swffiEieRt historiEal, arEhiteEtwral or Ellltw;:l sig:ifiEaREe to
£tllahfy as h1storiE areas.
CoRtribwtiRg (or E~Rtribwtorvl A sigRifieaRt bwilaiRg, site, strllEtllre or objeet whieh aaas to
the arehlteetwral£tllalities, historie assoEiatioR or areheologieal val we of aR histo ·
aistriEt BeEallSe: FIE
I'
ll.
c.
It was preseRt awriRg the pertiReRt historiE time ·
It· po~ses.ses iRtegrity aRe refleets its sigRifiEaRt historiE eharaeter or is eapable of
y1elamg lmportaRt iRformatioR allowt the pertiReRt historie perioa; or
It iRaepeRaeRtly meets the staRe ares aRe eriteria of this artiEie.
Cwltwral at~ribwtes. All of the physieal featwres of aR area that, either iRaepeRaeRtl" orB"
"1Ft e f th · · 1 T ' .' w oe1r IRterre atioRship, are geRerally iaeRtifiea aRe aeseribea as beiRg
lmporta~t proawets of hwmaR thowght aRe aetioR EharaeteristiE of a popwlatioR or
EommllRity. /\eeoraiRgl•j, the term "ewltwral attribwtes" Reeessaril" iRGiwaes
" h. I
1
arE 1teetwra attribwtes" as that term is aefiRea iR this seEtioR The term "ewltwral
~ttrillwtes" aoes Rot refer to the eharaeteristies or beliefs of people who may resiae
IR or fre£tlleRt a partiewlar area.
Cwltwral resowree. Distriets, sites, strwetwres, objeets aRe eviaeREe of some importaREe to a
Ellltwre, a swbewltwre or eommwRity for seieRtifiE, eRgiReeriRg art traaitioR r . I I I
re 1g1ows or other reasoRs sigRifieaRt iR proviaiRg resowrees aRe eR\•iroRmeR t al Elata
Reeessary for the stway aRe iRterpretatioR of past lifestyles, aRe for iRterpretiRg
hwmaR behavior.
l>epartmeRt. The l>epartmeRt f PI . a · · oaRRIRg aR ProteEti'Je lierVIEes of the Cit" f J n
Missowri , ' o e ersoR,
QesigR eriteria. 1\ staRaara of appropriate aeti"ity that will preserve the historie aRe
arehiteetwral eharaeter of a strwetwre or area.
l>esigRatioR. O~ieial reeogRitioR of aR historie laRamarl<, EORservatioR or historiE aistriEt B"
the Cit'( CowReil aeEoraiRg to the proeeawres aRe provisioRs iR this artiGie.
1
Created: 2022-03·14 19:53:55 (EST]
(Supp. No. 11)
Page 9 of 14
Direeter. Tlle.Direeter ef tile De~artmeRt ef PlaRRiRg a Rei Pretecti•te ~ervices, er llis er ller
eleslgRee.
i>RelaRgereel reseuree. A reseurce uReter a I<RB '"'R er aRtici~ateel tllre t f e1 ll . . . n a e a mage te t e
f\ Mi
8
c.
IRtegnty er e111steRee ef tile reseuree, sucll as;
f\ • e~· nR 1mme late tllreat 'Nilicll will result iR less ef er cella~se ef a structure·
f\ • e~· R 1mme •ate tllreat er elestruetieR ey ~ri•tate aetieR; er
CeRelemRatieR fer cede uielatieRs.
(~emetimes referred teas a "tllreateReel reseurce"),
i>Mterier arcllit~ctural a!l!learaRce. Tile arelliteetural cllaraeter a REI geReral cem~esitieR ef tile
e11~er~er ef a structure, iRclueliRg 9ut Ret limited te tile l<iRel, celer a REI te11ture ef tile
~u1IEI•Rg ~aterial a Rei tile ty~e, elesigR aRd cllaraeter ef all wiRde•Ns, dears, ligllt
f111tures, s1gRs, aRd a~~urteRaRt elemeRts.
~ll~ ~Mterier faee ef a 9uildiRg wllicll is tile arelliteetural freRt, semetimes
ll•stiRguislled 9y elaeeratieR er arclliteetural er erRameRtal details.
Flisteric distr~et. AR area desigRateel as aR llisteric district ey ereliRaRce ef tile City CeuReil aRd
":ll•ell may eeRtaiR "'itlliR elefiRaele geegra~llie eeuRelaries eRe er mere sigRifieaRt
s1tes, structures er eejeets, aRe! wlliell may llave witlliR its eeuRelaries etller
~_re~~rties er structures tllat, wllile Ret ef suell llisteric aRd/er arclliteetural
SlgRifleaRee te 9e elesigRateel as laRdmarl<s, Revertlleless te tile everall virtue
e~aracteristies ef tile sigRit:ieaRt sites, structures er eejectslecated witlliR tile
lllste.rie district. llisterical a REI cultural sigRificaRce fer wllicll mast ef all ef tile
!lllys•_eal a~trieutes (structures, streets, llUBiic areas, arclleelegieal etc.) relevaRt te
tile ll1stencal er cultural!lerieel ef sigRifieaRce Re laRger e 11ist.
Histeric !lreseP•atieR Tile t ... .... ·• . . s u .. 'l> ,,.eRtltieatieR, ~retectieR, resteratieR aRd rellaeilitatieR ef
9uild1Rgs, structures, eejeets, districts, areas a REI sites sigRificaRt iR tile llistew
ll"t t j) are • ec ure, arclleeleg\' er culture ef tile City, State er RatieR.
Histerieally er arelliteeturally sigRificaRt. PessessiRg til at quality ~reseRt iR aR area site
structure, eeject er elistriet eeeause it· '
1
f\ ., Is asseciateel "'itll aR e"eRt er e"e t til t · "f .... R sa SlgRHcaRtly ceRtrieuteel te tile bread
~atterRs ef tile llistery er arcllitecturallleritage ef tile Cit" CeuRt" State r " n er Ra 19Ri
Created: 2022-63-14 10:53:55 [EST}
(Supp . No. 11)
Pa ge 10 of 14
8. Is ass_eEiateEI witll tile life er li•;es sf a ~erseA er ~erseAs sigAifiEaAt iA tile !lister" sf
tile (lt'y, (SYAt'f, !itate SF AatieA; I
!;:mseaies ElistiAEti•;e ERaraEteristiEs sf a ty~e, aesigA, ~erieEI er metlleEI sf
EBAStFYEtiBAj
o. Re~reseAts tile werk sf a master ElesigAer er arEiliteEt er ~assesses lligll
arEiliteEtyral "a lYe;
!;:Mem~lifies tile EYitYral, ~elitiEal, eEeAemiE1 seEial er llisteriE lleritage sf tile Cit"· fl
~sA~~ iRs elemeAts sf ElesigA 1 detail, material er EraftsmaAslli~ wiliER re~reseAt a
SlgAifiEaAt EBAStFYEtiSA iAASIIatiBAj
(;, Is ~art sf er relates tea Set Yare, ~arl< er etller ElistiAEtive area til at • ...,as er slleiiiEI se
:~eEl er ~reserves aEEeraiAg te a ~Ia A bases sA aA llisteriE er arEiliteEtllral
Is a A estaslislleEI aAEI familiar \'isYal feat11re sf a AeigllserlleeEI er tile eAtire
EemmiiAity; SF
I, l-Ias yield eEl, er is lil<ely te yield arEileelegiEal artifaEts aAEI/er iAfermatieA
Key ESAtFiBIItiAg, !'.Site, StFIIEtllre SF esjeEt sf SliER a A BlltstaAGiAg Ejllalit" aRB state ef
EeAse_r .. ~tieA tllat it sigAifiEaAtly aEIEis te tile arEiliteEtllral Ejllalit;es, llisteriE
asseEiatleA er arEileelegiEal \<al11es sf aA llisteriE ElistriEt seEallse·
A,
ll.
It was ~reseAt EIYriAg tile ~ertiAeAt llisteriE time·
~t ~essesse~ aAEI ref~eEts its sigAifiEaAt llisteriE ERaraEter er is Ea~asle sf yieiEiiAg
•m~ertaAt IAfermat•eA ase11t tile ~ertiAeAt llisteriE ~eriea· aAEI )
It iAEie~eAEieAtly meets tile staAEiaras a REI eriteria sf tile artiEie .
baAEimarl< I' site, strYEtllre er esjeEt ElesigAateEI as a Ia Asmari< B" eraiAaAEe sf tile Cit"
C "I f I BIIAEI I ~IIFSYaAt te ~FSEeGYFeS ~FeSEFisea llereiA1 til at is "'SFtR" sf rellasilitaf
re t f El ' IBA, s era IBA aA ~reservatieA seEaYse sf its llisteriE aAEI/er arEiliteEtYral sigAifiEaAEe
te tile City.
Created: 2022-03-14 10:53: 55 (EST]
(Supp . No. 11)
Pa ge 11 of 14
baRelseape. fe.atiHe. ARy elemeRt er eemJ3eReRt ef e11teleer eJ3eR SJ3aEe iREIIIeliRg, bllt Ret
hm1teel te, feREes , walls, retaiRiRg '#ails, gates, sielewa111s, wa111ways, elri"e"•a"S k '" I'
J3ar iRg lets, 13aties, terraees, elecks 1 gre11Rel cever1 trees, J3laRts 1 e 11 teleer fllrRitllre
eKterier ligl:lt staRelarels1 feiiRtaiRs, stat11 aPIJ eletael:leel sigRs, a Rei etl:ler SIICR
1
elemeRts
be cal l:listeric elistrict. /\ l:listeric eli strict establisl:leel iR accerelaRce witl:l Cl:laj3ter g A rticl I" f
tl:le City Ceele.
1
n e v e
Marker A sig~ 11seel te label er ieleRtify a elesigRateellaRelmarll er l:listeriE elistrict as aR
arcl:l•tect11rally sigRificaRt 13reJ3erty.
NatieRal Register.' Tl:le c~rre~t NatieRal Register ef ~isteric Places establisl:leel by 13 assage ef
tl:le NatleRal ~1stenc PreservatieR Act ef 1999 go Stat 91S 19 u s c 470 ameReleel ' ' ' ' ' ' et seq. as
NeRceRtribllti.Rg (er ReRceRtriblltery), A site, striiEtllre er ebject tl:lat elees Ret aelel te tl:le
arcl:l1tect11ral q11alities 1 l:listeric asseciatieR er arcl:leelegical \•allies ef a laRelmarll
l:listeric elistrict beca 11 se· er
A Vh
8.
c.
It was Ret J3reseRt el11riRg tl:le 13ertiReRt time·
~11e t~ alteratieRs, elist11rbaRces 1 aelelitieRs er etl:ler cl:laRges, it Re leRger J3essesses
~Rtegnty R~r reflects its sigRificaRt l:listeric el:laraeter er is iREaJ3able ef yieleliRg
1m13ertaRt IRfermatieR abe11t tl:le J3ertiReRt l:listeriE 13 erieel; er
It elees Ret iReleJ3eReleRtly meet tl:le staRelarels a Rei eriteria ef tl:le erel iRaRee.
Nermal maiRt~RaREe a~el rep~ir. ARy imj3revemeRt er werk fer wl:licl:l a b11ileliRg 13 ermit is Ret
req111reel by Cit'/ ereiiRaREe elesigReel te eerreet eleterieratieR, eleeay er elamage aRel
re~tere, as may be j3ractical, a str11et11re er 13reJ3erty te tl:le eeRelitieR tl:lat eKisteel
J3Fier te tl:le eleterieratieR 1 elecay er elamage,
Netable striiEtllre. A striiEtllre fell Rei te be Retable J3er tl:le review uiteria listeel iR SllbseetieR
~
Created: 2022-03-14 10:53:55 (EST)
(Supp . No. 11)
Pa ge 12 of 14
~!:lese flllysiEal items tllat !:lave fiiREtieRal, aestlletiE, E11lt11ral, llisteriEal er sEieRtifiE
val11e aRa are relati•Jelysmall iR sEale a Ad simfll" EeRstriiEtea "'llile a b" t I • u R 8 jeE ma"
be, ~'I Rat11re er desigR, me•Jable, it slle11ld be leEatea iRa SfleEifiE settiRg er
1
~RVIFSRmeRt aflflFSflriate te its sigRifiEaRt llisteriE 11se, rele er EllaraEter. ObjeEts
IREI11de SEIIIfltllres, meRIImeRts, street sigRs, feREe flSSts, llitEiliRg flSSts, milefleSts
be11Rdary marl<ers, stat11ary aRd feiiRtaiRs '
OwRer(s) ef reEera. Tllese iRdi~·id11als, flartRersllifls, firms, ESFfleratieRs, flllbliE ageREies er
aRy ~tiler legal eRtity lleldiRg title te flFSflerty, b11t Ret iREIIIdiRg legal eRtities
~eldiRg mere easemeRts er leasellela iRterests. (May alse be referred te as
flFSflertyewRer(s)"), C11rreRt ewRer(s) ef reEera are tllese listed as ewRers eR tile
reEeras witll tile Cele Ce11Rty ReEeraer ef Qeeas.
Peri ea. A EllreRelegiEal aivisieR ideRtifiea iR tile aRalysis ef tile llisteriEal aeveleflmeRt te aR
area er regieR (i.e., ViEteriaR, MedeFR).
PreteEtieR. Tile aflflliEatieR ef meas11res te defeRs, g11ara, ES'Jer er slliela a bllilaiRg site str~E~IIre er ebjeEt frem aeterieratieR, less, attaEI<, aaRger, er iRjiiF'f lA til~ Ea:e ef
biiiiSIRgs, str11Et11res er ebjeEts s11Eil meas 11 res geRerally are ef a JlreteEti"e Ratllre
aRa IIS~ally flreEeae flreservatieR meas11res. IR tile Ease ef arEileelegiEal sites, tile
flFeteEtlve meas11res maybe temJleraryer flermaReRt.
ReEeRstriiEtieR/reEeRstriiEt. Tile ref!rediiEtieR ef tile eMaEt ferm a Ad detail ef a vaRisllea
~~~ildiR~, site, striiEtllre er ebjeEt er a Jlart tllereef, as it aflflearea at a flertiReRt
t1me II SlAg betll erigiRal aRd mea erR materials a Ad based eR JlreEise llisterieal
deEIImeRtatieR aRd flllysiEal evideREe.
RellabilitatieR/rellabilitate Tile aEt ef retllrRiRg a site, striiEtllre er ebjeEt tea llseflllstate
tllre11gll its ref! air aRd/er alteratieR wllile retaiRiRg tile EllaraEteristiE feat 11 res ef tile
flrSflerty wlliEil are sigRifiEaRt te its llisteriEal a Ad arEiliteEtllral "a1 11 e
RemeaeliRg. MeaifiEatieR aRd meaerRi~atieR ef t t . a s FilE IHe er flFSflerty witlle11t stri•JiRg te
retllrR te er reflhEate tile erigiRal llisteriEal a Ad arEiliteEtllral EllaraEter ef tile
str11Et11re er flFSflerty.
Remeval. AR'f releEatieR ef a str11Et11re iR wllele er iR Jlart eR its site er te aRetller site
~R'f Ella Age tea str11Et11re er ebjeet til at is Ret EeRstr11 EtieR, reme"al er alteratieR.
Resell FEe. !'.R'f site, str11Et11re, ebjeEt er area til at EeRstitlltes a se11rEe ef flFeSeRt a Ad flltllre
11sef11IRess.
Cr eated: 2B22 ·B3 ·14 10:53:55 [EST]
(Supp. No . 11)
Pa ge 13 of 14
RestaratiaR/restare. The aet af aEEIIratel" reeaveriRg the farm a REI elet ·1 b e1 -_ _ 1 a1 s, -ase-aR preEise
h1staneal ElaellmeRtatiaR aREiph"sieal e"iEieREe af a b 'lei' 't r • , Ill lAg, 51 e, str11Et11re ar
abjeet as it appeared at a pertiReRt time iREIIIEiiRg the rema·1 al af impravemeRts
that are Rat apprapriate a REI the replaeemeRt af missiRg ar eleteriarateel feat11 res.
Site. The laeatiaR af a sigRifieaRt e•JeRt 1 a prehistarie ar histarie 96611 patiaR ar aEti"it" ar a
b 'lei' • " :Ill lAg ar str11Et11re, v•l:!etl=ler staREiiRg 1 rwiReel ar •JaRisl=leel 1 wl:!ere tl:!e laeatiaR
Itself passesses l:!istarie, ewltwral ar arel=lealagiealvalwe regardless af tl:!e valwe af
a_R'f existiR_g strwetw_re _ !;xa~ples af sites iREiwele l:!abitatiaR sites, bwrial sites, village
Slt~s,_l=lwRtiRg aREI f1si=I1Rg Sites, eeremaRial sites, battlefields, rwiRs af l:!istarie
bw11E11Rgs aREistrwet_wres, eampsites, elesigReellaREiseapes, Ratwral textwres, spriRgs
aREIIaREiseapes i=la'JIRg ewltwral sigRifieaRee.
Stable. Tl=le area is expeeteel ta remaiR swbstaRtially tl=le same aver tl=le Relit 2Q "ear peri eel
'tl:i . I w1 eaRtiRWeEI maiRteRaRee af ti=le prapert" '"'i=lile same 1=1 • 1• .v E aRges IR strwetwres la~elwses aREI EleRsities mayaeewr, all swel:! ei=laRges are e11 peEteel ta be Eampati~le
Wlti=l 51lFF91lREiiRg ele·;elapmeRt,
StabililiRg. Tl:!~ area is_expeeteel ta beeame stable a"er ti=le A ext 2Q year peri eel tl:!rawgl:!
EaRtiRWeEI reiRvestmeRt1 maiRteRaRee ar remaeleliRg.
StaREiarels, T~~ Seeretaror af IRteriar's StaRelarels far ti=le TreatmeRt af Histarie Praperties,
eaellfJeel as ~a (;~R 88 iR tl:!e Jwly12, lQQ!i ~eeleral Register (Val. (ig Na n~) a REI
revised fram time ta time. ' '
1
as
Strwetwre. JI.Ryti=liRg eaRstrweteel ar ereeteel 1 tl:!e wse af wl:!iel:! re 11 wires permaReRt ar
tempar~rylaeatiaR SA ar iR tl:!e grawREI 1 iRelweliRg 1 bwt witl:!awt limitiRg tl:!e
geRerahtyaf the faregaiRg · bwileliRgs1 feRee 1 gazelles, aei•JertisiRg sigRs billbaarels
baekstaps far teAR is eawrts, raelia aREI tele•JisiaR aRteRRas, iRelweliRg sw
1
ppartiRg
1
tawers aREI swimmiRg peals.
~The speeifie ieleRtifyiRg eharaeteristies af a bwileliRg bath as it appears ta the .. e1 r
1
eye aR as
IISIRS>NR ta e11ist iR elesigR aREI strwetwre.
~JI.R arehiteetwral aRd l=listarieal examiRatiaR af histarie resawrees ta ieleRtif" histarie
praperties withiR aR area.
1
Created: 2022-03-14 10:53:55 (EST]
(Supp. No. 11)
Pa ge 14 of 14
TO:
THROUGH:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES
MEMORANDUM
Public Works & Planning Committee
Sonny Sanders, Planning & Protective Services Director
Rachel Senzee, Neighborhood Services Supervisor
August 9, 2022
Neighborhood Services' Grants Status Report
Due to the increased amount of federal funding, Neighborhood Services will maintain a
standing agenda item to update Council and the Public. The status report will include
current projects and subgrant information, pending application statuses, and upcoming
funding opportunities . Informational links will also be provided, when available.
The intent of the grant status report is to :
1. Update the Public about funding opportunities
2 . Give Council the information necessary to provide their respective constituency
3 . Provide information to support budgetary decisions
Committee Request: None -information only .
For questions or comments, please contact Rachel Senzee at
. rsenzee@jeffersoncitymo .gov or 573-634-6305.
Neighborhood Services Grants Update
Public Works & Planning-June 9, 2022
Current Project Status:
Economic Development Administration (EDA)-DR MSP Infrastructure
$3,099,595 Total Project Cost
Current Timeline:
• MSP Redevelopment Coalition: Office of Administration (OAL DNR, City, JCREP, CMPS,
and developer meet once a month to coordinate development projects
• Work on the developer's agreement is underway. Anticipated to go before Council in
September.
• Programmatic Agreement with SHPO/EDA-ASAP
o SHPO recommended getting MSP listed on National Register-nomination was
submitted July 7.
• Comments were received. Edits to draft are required by August 15 .
o CMPS has prepared a tentative demolition plan
o City staff, the proposed developer, and OA are preparing terms of mitigation for
the loss of cultural resources
• A formal grant amendment, to reflect updated timelines, will be sent Council once EDA
approves
• Design: August-December 2022
• Construction-January 2023-January 2026
EDA CARES-Economic Recovery Plan ~ $30,000-$70,000 (Through RPC}
Current Timeline:
• Complete planning document by December 31, 2022
• Working with JCREP and RPC to create a Broadband Infrastructure Plan. A completed
plan will incentivize broadband providers to build out broadband infrastructure in Cole
County.
• Finley Engineering will be conducting the Broadband Plan
o City will help disseminate surveys and with other outreach components of the
plan
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)-Entitlement Funds-PY2022 $300,250
Current Timeline:
• Spend funds by December 31, 2022
• Projects include :
o Down Payment Assistance (met goal)
o Emergency Home Repair
o Voluntary Demolitions
o Adams/Hicko ry St. Sidewalk project-contributing $313,000
• Received Authority to Use Grant Funds
• Impediments for Fair Housing plan is required to be updated every five years .
• Action Plan has been submitted to HUD for FY22 (Program Year 2023) funds.
CDBG-CARES (CV)-Childcare Facility Grants -$413,435
Current Timeline :
• Funds need to be spent by December 31, 2022
• All funds have been subgranted to 11 childcare facilities for: childcare subsidies,
overhead costs, or small construction projects to prepare, prevent, or respond to
COVID-19
• $82 ,687 fo r ad min (staff time and Housing Needs Assessment)
• $330,748 in subgrants
CDBG-Disaster Recovery (DR)-Housing Recovery Activities $7,059,300
• Program Proposal was sent to the Department of Economic Development (DED).
• DED is preparing to put out a Request for Proposals for Multi-Family New Construction
to be layered with Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) through the Missouri Housing
Development Commission (MHDC). CDBG-DR proposals are due September 5; MHDC
p roposals are due September 23.
o To date, three housing developers are pursuing this opportun ity. Proposed
project locations are located on the eastside, westside, and central city.
• Next Steps:
o Receive/accept overall proposal award
o Select contingency awards for Multi-Family New Construction applicants
pursuing LIHTC
• Once MHDC selects recipients, the City will know what remains of the DR
budget and will begin working on other program opportunities.
Historic Preservation Fund (HPF)
HPF Resurvey Historic East-$23,000 Total Project Cost
• Consultant, David Taylor, is actively working on the project
• Deliverables are due July 2022
HPF Lower Jefferson Survey-$23,000 Total Project Cost
• Consultant, David Taylor, is actively working on the project
• Deliverables are due July 2022
HPF Historic Context-$50,000 Total Project Cost
• Consultant, Owen Eastlake, meeting with Historic Preservation Commission,
SHPO, and staff February 8, 2022
• Deliverables are due July 2022
HPF Structural Assessment-$28,000
• All-State is preparing structural assessments for:
o 413 E Capitol
o 419 E Capitol
o 429 E Capitol
o 114 Jackson
o 517 E Capitol
Paul Bruhn Revitalization Grant-$675,000
• Received 6 applications. Applications will be scored and recommended for
funding at the next Historic Preservation Commission meeting .
• Next steps include:
o Award grants to subrecipients
o Have applicants begin professional design and get National Parks Se rvice
approval based off Secretary of Interior's Standards.
o Conduct environmental reviews
• Grant must be completed by September 30, 2024
State CDBG-CV Cole County EMS -$2,000,000
• Held the kick-off meeting for the grant
o Currently conducting environmental and preparing accounting flow
• Building an EMS facility on the corner of Adams and E. McCarty
• City is lead applicant
• Staff monitor and provide oversite
• Administration f or City staff-$45,000
State CDBG-CV-$689,760
• Funded, waiting on awa r d documents: Compass Health Planning-$100,000
o Market analysis focused on special needs and vulnerable populations
• Funded, award accepted: Transformational Housing-$544,000
o Rehabilitate 101 Jackson into transitional housing
o New roof has been put on (separate from grant funding)
o Currently facilitating environmental review, including Brownfield, and
procurement
• Administration-$45,760 (staff time)
Pending Applications:
Historic Preservation Fund -Approved for funding
• Design Guidelines-$50,000
o Guide al lows for historic preservation, new development, and redevelopment
• West Main Phase Ill Architectural Survey
Upcoming Opportunities:
RAISE Grants -Due April, 2023
• Funds up to $25 million in infrastructure projects
• 20% match, potentially less depending on project
• Opportunity to f und identified projects in:
o Metropolitan Transportation Plan (pg . 102}
Choice Neighborhood Planning Grant -Due July 2023
• Funds up to $500,000 for a two-year neighborhood Transformation Plan
• Housing Authority is interested in pursuing
• Transformation Plan implementation may be then pursued for up to $50 million
Department of Economic Development-American Rescue Plan Act Programs -Open July
2022 (tentative)
• Local ARPA funds can be used as match forDED ARPA programs
• Community Revitalization Grant Program -DED closed public comment period July 11.
Anticipates opening up funding August 1-0ctober 3
All things Bipartisan Infrastructure Law
• Link above includes timelines and local eligibility requirements