Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout2023-01-12 packetNotice of Meeting & Tentative Agenda let n / • 4'P� • •is City of Jefferson Planning and Zoning Commission Thursday, January 12, 2023 — 5:15 P.M. Council Chambers, John G. Christy Municipal Building, 320 East McCarty Street Enter through Main Lobby All interested parties will be given a chance to be heard. TENTATIVE AGENDA 1. Call to Order and Introductions 2. Procedural Matters • Determination of quorum and designation of voting alternates • Call for cases • Receive and review requests for continuance • Receive requests for reordering the agenda • Format of hearing • List of exhibits 3. Adoption of Agenda (as printed or reordered) 4. Approval of the Regular Meeting Minutes of December 08, 2022 5. Communications Received 6. New Business/Public Hearings Case No. P23001 —1110 Cedar City Drive, Rezoning from M-1 to PUD and Preliminary Planned Unit Development (PUD) Site Plan. Request filed by Jay and Kimberly Fischer, property owners, for rezoning of approximately 3 acres from M-1 Light Industrial to PUD Planned Unit Development and a Preliminary PUD Development Plan for a farm to market retail store. The property is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Cedar City Drive and Oil Well Road and is described as Part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 9, Township 44 North, Range 11 West, in the City of Jefferson, Callaway County, Missouri. (Central Missouri Professional Services, Consultant). Case No. P23002 — 2200 Block of St. Mary's Boulevard, Rezoning from C-2 to RA-2 and Preliminary Subdivision Plat. Request filed by MATEJO, LLC, property owner, for a rezoning of 9.09 acres from C-2 General Commercial to RA-2 High Density (Multi -Family) Residential and a preliminary subdivision plat consisting of 25 lots. The property is located northwest of the intersection of St. Mary's Boulevard and Heisinger Road and is described as Part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 11, Township 44 North, Range 12 West, in the City of Jefferson, Cole County, Missouri. (Central Missouri Professional Services, Consultant). Case No. P23003 — 309 & 311 Bolivar Street, Amendment to PUD Plan. Request filed by Capital Opportunity Fund LLC, property owner, to amend the approved PUD Planned Unit Development plan to change the number and orientation of parking spaces located on the north side of the property adjacent to West Wall Way. The property is located on the northeast corner of the intersection of West McCarty Street and Bolivar Street and is described as the northerly part of Inlot No. 424, in the City of Jefferson, Cole County, Missouri. Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. Please call (573) 634-6410 with questions regarding agenda items. Case No. P23004 — 1000 Block of Marshall St., Final Subdivision Plat of TC3C Subdivision. Request filed by Zeal Enterprise, LLC, property owner, for a Final Subdivision Plat for 1.88 acres proposing creation of 10 lots. The property is zoned RS-4 Medium Density Residential and is located on the Marshall Street cul- de-sac 250 feet north of East Franklin Street and with frontage also on Roland Street and is described as Part of the Northeast Quarter Section 18, Township 45 North, Range 1 I West, in the City of Jefferson, Cole County, Missouri. (Central Missouri Professional Services, Consultant). Other New Business 8. Other Business A. Staff updates on prior cases B. Introduction of New Planning and Zoning Members 9. Adjourn Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. Please call (573) 634-6410 with questions regarding agenda items. Minutes JEFFERSON CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION December 8, 2022 5:15 p.m. COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT Dale Vaughan, Chair Penny Quigg, Vice Chair Gregory Butler Bunnie Trickey Cotten Emily Fretwell Shanon Hawk Hank Vogt Jacob Robinett, Alternate Randy Hoselton, Alternate COMMISSION MEMBERS ABSENT Treaka Young Tom Werdenhause, Alternate COUNCIL LIAISON PRESENT Michael Lester STAFF PRESENT Eric Barron, Planning Manager Dustin Birch, Associate City Counselor Kortney Bliss, Planner Shane Wade, Civil Engineer Lisa Dittmer, Administrative Assistant ATTENDANCE RECORD 6of6 6 of 6 3 of 6 6 of 6 5 of 6 6of6 6 of 6 4of6 1 of 1 Guest: Paul Samson with Central Missouri Professional Services. 5 of 6 Oof1 Call to Order and Introduction of Members, Ex-officio Members and Staff Chair Dale Vaughan called the meeting to order. Six regular members and two alternates were present. A quorum was present. Designation of Voting Alternates The Chair announced that all regular members and alternates present are eligible to vote. 2. Procedural Matters and Procedures Explained Ms. Bliss explained the procedures for the meeting. The following documents were entered as exhibits. Ms. Bliss advised that copies of the exhibits are available through the City Clerk or the Department of Planning and Protective Services: The City Code of the City of Jefferson, as amended Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map Copies of applications under consideration A list of property owners to whom notices were sent Affidavit of publication of the public notice in the newspaper Rules of Procedure, Planning & Zoning Commission Ms. Bliss submitted the following items for the record: Staff reports Minutes of proceedings Copies of drawings, plans, and/or renderings under consideration Letters or memoranda from staff Materials submitted by the public or applicants pertaining to the cases under consideration 3. Adoption of Agenda Ms. Cotten moved and Ms. Quigg seconded to approve the agenda. The motion passed 8-0 with the following votes: Aye: Butler, Cotten, Fretwell, Hawk, Hoselton, Quigg, Robinett, and Vogt. Nay: None 4. Approval of the Regular Meeting Minutes of November 10, 2022. Ms. Butler moved and Mr. Vogt seconded to approve the regular meeting minutes of November 10, 2022 as printed. The motion passed 8-0 with the following votes: Aye: Butler, Cotten, Fretwell, Hawk, Hoselton, Quigg, Robinett, and Vogt. Nay: None 5. Communications Received No communication received. 6. New Business/Public Hearing Case No. P22016 - 900 Block of Emily Lane, Preliminary and Final Plat of Emily Lane Subdivision Section Three. Request filed by Mark and Julie Gerlach, property owner, for a Preliminary and Final Subdivision Plat for 3.39 acres consisting of three lots. The property is zoned RA-1 High Density Residential and is located at the terminus of Emily Lane and is described as Part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 8, Township 44 North, Range 12 West, in the City of Jefferson, Missouri. (Central Missouri Professional Services, Consultant). Ms. Bliss stated the applicant is requesting a preliminary and final subdivision plat for the 900 block of Emily Lane. The property is zoned RA-1 High Density Residential. The owner plans to divide the 3.39-acre property into three separate lots with each lot having connection to a proposed cul-de-sac finishing off the current dead end of Emily Lane. Paul Samson with Central Missouri Professional Services (CMPS), representing property owner Mark and Julie Gerlach, presented the case. The property owners purchased the property within the last year and are interested in developing the property for multi -family residential uses. The property was recently annexed into the city and is zoned RA-1, which matches the existing part of Emily Lane. CMPS has submitted the street improvement plans and sanitary sewer extension plans which would allow building of the cul-de-sac and the sanitary sewer mains that would serve each of the lots. Site plans will be submitted as construction goes on each lot. Mailboxes will be addressed during site plans. Mr. Wade advised there is public infrastructure in the vicinity, Emily Lane is servicing section one and two of the subdivision currently. Sidewalks exist along one side of Emily Lane, the street is being proposed to be completed and terminate with a cul-de-sac with this proposal. The street is a 28-foot-wide street with parking allowed on one side of the roadway. Stormwater detention, stormwater quality, and erosion/sediment control will be private and part of the site development. Some clearing activity has occurred on the site, staff asks that some perimeter fencing, granular construction entrance and any other erosion control be installed to stabilize the site for the portion that has been cleared. A land disturbance permit will also need to be completed by the property owner. The upstream drainage for the existing channel that runs along lot 24 carries over 50 acres of drainage, staff asks that there is a stream and structure setback for lot 24. Sewer main and sidewalks are being proposed to be extended to serve all of the lots. Facilities for street lights, utilities, and fire hydrants are all existing within the current subdivision and meet city standards. Ms. Bliss stated that staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat and the requested final plat with the condition that any technical corrections or comments be addressed from staff. Ms. Cotten moved and Ms. Quigg seconded a motion to approve requested preliminary plat of Emily Lane Subdivision Section Three subject to technical comments and corrections by city staff. The motion passed 8-0 with the following votes: Aye: Butler, Cotten, Fretwell, Hawk, Hoselton, Quigg, Robinett, and Vogt. Nay: None. Ms. Cotton moved and Mr. Vogt seconded a motion to recommend approval of requested final plat of Emily Lane Subdivision Section Three subject to technical comments and corrections by city staff. The motion passed 8-0 with the following votes: Aye: Butler, Cotten, Fretwell, Hawk, Hoselton, Quigg, Robinett, and Vogt. Nay: None. 7. Other New Business 8. Other Business A. Staff Updates on Prior Cases Mr. Barron advised the daycare/coffee shop on Stonehill Road was approved by City Council as an amendment to the PUD plan. The JC Gymnastics building on Four Seasons Drive was approved by the City Council for a PUD plan amendment. The special exception permit for the Algoa Industrial Park Transload Facility was approved by the City Council. Mr. Barron gave an update on the Capital Area Active Transportation Plan and reminded members to complete the survey. B. New Planning and Zoning Commission Members Mr. Hoselton introduced himself to the commission. Mr. Werdenhause was not present. Adjourn. There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 5:56 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Lisa Dittmer, Administrative Assistant Jefferson City Planning &Zoning Commission January 12, 2023 Case No. P23001 1010 Cedar City Drive Jay and Kimberly Fischer 1. Rezoning from M-1 Light Industrial to PUD Planned Unit Development 2. Preliminary PUD Plan City of Jefferson Manning 8,, Zonng Comma ssoon LOCAT DON MAP 47,s�-- - rl_ D YJ "k �/ /.. co !Proposed.Rezoning an ,-u PUD Plan Site Area SIXTH ST LEY RS-4 w t is Z .-0 -- � � �.L O� ' , ` ).7 0Sol U) ---FO.UR-T-H-ST-- Case No. P23001 0 137.5 275 550 Feet N 1110 Cedar City Drive Rezoning from M-1 to PUD and Preliminary PUD Plan W+ E S City of Jefferson Planning and Zoning Commission VICINITY o� \ /'�y�Ysi3 0/. �KAT•Y-RD-� 63 hb l' 22 77O'q y_ ry � ryy� >> 63 1 dc 28 7.760, SIXTH:SAr� ea of Proposed Rezoning and / 26=7761 T � y Prelimi, aryPUD Pla 1I LEY S� �FIFTH -�S7T FIOURTH:ST FOURTH=ST N THI— RD STL - 0 ca ro z 0 o Case No. P23001 N 1010 Cedar City Drive 0 235 470 940 Feet Rezoning from M-1 from PUD and Preliminary PUD Plan W r E S PLANNING STAFF REPORT JEFFERSON CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION January 12, 2023 Case No. P23001-1110 Cedar City Drive, Rezoning from M-1 to PUD and Preliminary Planned Unit Development (PUD) Site Plan. Request filed by Jay and Kimberly Fischer, property owners, for rezoning of approximately 3 acres from M-1 Light Industrial to PUD Planned Unit Development and a Preliminary PUD Development Plan for a farm to market retail store. The property is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Cedar City Drive and Oil Well Road and is described as Part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 9, Township 44 North, Range 11 West, in the City of Jefferson, Callaway County, Missouri. (Central Missouri Professional Services, Consultant). Nature of Request A request was filed by the property owners to rezone a section of property from M-1 Light Industrial to PUD Planned Unit Development. The applicants also request a Preliminary PUD Plan for a 2880 square foot retail farm to market store. Both portions of the request would occur on a portion of the property approximately 3 acres. This proposal does occur on two separate parcels owned by the applicants. The applicants have expressed within their PUD Plan narrative a proposed intent to divide this 3 acre piece off from the two parcels at a later date. Review and Approval Process Processing of Preliminary PUD Plans occur with respect to the City Code.. The role of the Planning and Zoning Commission is to review applications for Preliminary PUD Plans and make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council is then to make a determination concerning the approval of such request. Zoning History The subject location has been involved in a few Planning and Zoning Commission cases. In 1988, the northern parcel was rezoned from RU to M-1. The southern parcel was rezoned to M-1 Light Industrial in 1989. Zoning and Surrounding Land Use: Current Zoning: M-1 Current Use: Open Land, Agricultural Requested Zoning: PUD Intended Use: Retail Farm to Market Store Surrounding Zoning Surrounding Uses North M-1 Open Land South M-1, RS-4, and C-2 Agricultural and Recreational East M-1 Open Land, Industrial West M-1 Agricultural, Open Land, Unincorporated Review Criteria for Rezoning: Section 35-74 B.4, lists review criteria for consideration of an amendment to the zoning ordinance text and zoning map. This case involves an amendment to the zoning map. The applicant has provided written responses to the review criteria for a rezoning. See attached application materials. City staff have also provided responses to the review criteria in the next section. Planning and Zoning Commission Case No. P23001 Staff Analysis of Rezoning Proposal: January, 12 2023 Page 2 Standard checklist for rezoning: Yes No Notes: The existing zoning was in error at the time of X The M-1 Light Industrial zoning adoption. designation was established nearly 30 years and development has not occurred. There has been a change in character in the area X Flooding of the Missouri River at due to installation of public facilities, other zone different times in the 1900s, changes, new growth trends, neighborhood including in 1993resulted in deterioration, or development transitions. dynamic changes in the development in the area was known as Cedar City. The proposed use would be similar to uses in the area. There is a community need for the proposed X The proposed rezoning to PUD and rezoning. related PUD Plan involves a retail farm to market store. This would add potential economic and tourist value to the community. The proposed change is consistent with, and in X The rezoning and related PUD Plan furtherance of, the implementation of the goals and appear to meet the requirements put policies of the comprehensive plan, other adopted forth by the Zoning Ordinance and, plans, and the policies, intents and requirements of further the proposal is subject to all this ordinance and other City regulations and applicable requirements and guidelines regulations. The proposed rezoning and use would be compatible with the area. The proposed zoning is compatible with the zoning X There are surrounding agricultural and uses of property nearby. land uses. PUD zoning has potential to be flexible in permitted uses on the site. Public and community facilities, which may X Existing roadways do exist in the include, but are not limited to, sanitary and storm area that can provide access to sewers, water, electrical service, police and fire several community facilities. protection, schools, parks and recreation facilities, Specifications of the site with roads, libraries, and solid waste collection and respect to connection to all required disposal, are available and adequate to serve uses utilities and compliance with all authorized under the proposed zoning. City Code requirements will be reviewed by each respective Departmental staff. Planning and Zoning Commission Case No. P23001 January, 12 2023 Page 3 Standard checklist for rezoning: Yes No Notes: Authorized uses shall not adversely affect the X The use is anticipated to produce capacity or safety of the street network in the low traffic flow. Thus, the nearby vicinity of the property. road network should have the capacity in order to facilitate the uses traffic volume. Potential environmental impacts (e.g., excessive X Potential environmental impacts of storm water runoff, water pollution, air pollution, the site have and will further be noise pollution, excessive lighting, or other reviewed by city staff with respect environmental harms) of authorized uses shall be to the City Code. The site would mitigated. need to be elevated out of the floodplain and obtain a floodplain permit from the City of Jefferson. There is an adequate supply of land available in the X The portion of the property subject area and the surrounding community to proposed to contain both the accommodate the zoning and community needs. rezoning and PUD Plan should be adequate and able to accommodate zoning and community needs. Benefits shall be derived by the community or area X Rezoning of the subject site would proposed to be rezoned provide a proposed use which has the potential to benefit the community with its specialized business model and capacity to serve both community members and tourists alike. Staff Analysis of Preliminary PUD Plan Building design: In accordance with information provided by the applicants, the main 2880 square foot structure would face the intersection and would contain timber and metal detailing to resemble a rustic barn. The building would contain retail floor area, freezer space, and restrooms. Other accessory structures such as a greenhouse are proposed to be constructed at a later date. Permitted Uses: The Preliminary PUD Plan outlines use of the property as retail farm to market store. The narrative specifies a request for and Planning and Zoning Division staff recommend establishment of an underlying zoning of C-1 Neighborhood Commercial for the purpose of determining future regulatory details regarding items such as permitted uses, signage, and lighting. aiML Applicants have stated that signage would be building mounted signs in the front as well as back of building. Any future signage would need to conform to the requirements outlined for the C-1 zoning district. Leg_ Proposed lighting would be building mounted lighting. Landscaping: Instead of parking lot landscaping, various vegetation types such as produce trees located adjacent to the parking lot and along the adjacent streets are proposed on the site plan. Parking: A gravel lot is proposed. This would be a deviation from Section 35-58. B.6 regarding parking lot paving. Driveway Two paved driveways conforming to City requirements are proposed with one driveway connecting to Cedar City Drive and the other to Oil Well Road. Traffic: The proposal does not exceed 100 peak hour vehicle trips and therefore does not trigger the requirement for a site specific traffic study. Planning and Zoning Commission Case No. P23001 January, 12 2023 Page 4 Staff Recommendation Staff recommend approval of the proposed rezoning and Preliminary PUD Plan. The rezoning from M-1 Light Industrial to PUD Planned Unit Development allows for the requested land use of retail farm to market store. Such use is compatible with surrounding land uses. The PUD Plan must comply with all applicable City Code requirements. Form of Motion 1. Motion to recommend approval to the City Council the request to rezone the property from M-1 to PUD. 2. Motion to recommend approval to the City Council of the requested Preliminary PUD Plan for a retail farm to market store with the following condition: The establishment of the C-1 Neighborhood Commercial underlying zoning designation for purposes of determining future permitted uses and requirements for signage, lighting, and other applicable site features. City of Jefferson Department of Planning & Protective Services 320 E. McCarty Street Jefferson City, MO 65101 Phone: 573-634-6410 JCPlannina(a)ieffersoncitymo.gov www.jeffersoncitymo.gov APPLICATION FOR ZONING AMENDMENTS 1. The undersigned hereby petitions the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council of the City of Jefferson, Missouri, for the following amendment to the Zoning Code: Map Amendment Text Amendment (Include description of proposed text amendment) Property Address: 1 1 1 0 Cedar City Drive 2. Applications for Map amendments shall include a location map and legal description. 3. This petition requests to rezone the above described real estate from its present classification of M-1 district to P U D district. The purpose of this rezoning request is to: Accommodate Farm to Market retail store. 4. Filing fee: Map Amendment = $650. Text Amendment = $450. 5. Required Findings: Applicant responses to the required findings shall be noted in Addendum A and vary based on type of request. 6. The undersigned certify to be all of the owner(s) of the above described property and that the submitted information (including all attachments to this application) is true and correct. (All owners of this propert must si n and the signatures must be notarized). Jay Fischer Prc,66rty Owner Signature Printed Name/Title (type or print) kxnt-�- I A,%a-W7L- Kimberly Fischer P operty Own r Signature Printed NamelTitle (type or print) L) this day of O ('C16CL/�— KIMM L BLAND Notary Public, Notary Seal State of Missouri � � } Cole County � A, �) )-ll �L J(i Commission d; 21 755109 Notary Public My Commission Expires 03-08-2025 For City Use Only: (Revised July 1, 2018) Application Filing Fee: Map Amendment = $650 ($450 + $200 Advertising Fee) Text Amendment = $450 ($250 + $200 Advertising Fee) Application Fill n Fee Received: Cash (receipt # ) Check (copy; check # ) Attachments: Ll Addendum A OMap ELApplicant/Project Information Sheet Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. Page 1 of 6 Jefferson City Zoning Amendment Application Addendum A — Review Criteria To be used to support zoning amendment requests. (Section 35-74.B.4) Property Address 1110 Cedar City Drive Applicant Name Jay and Kimberly Fischer Provide responses to the following required findings by selecting all criteria that apply to your request. State all reasons for your answer and use additional pages to complete your answer if necessary. A. The existing zoning was in error at the time of adoption. Explain. The purpose of the rezoning request is to allow for a retail farm to market store within a PUD plan framework. B. There has been a change in character in the area due to installation of public facilities, other zone changes, new growth trends, neighborhood deterioration, or development transitions. Explain the change and be specific on which public facilities, other zone changes, new growth trends, neighborhood deterioration, or development transitions that effected the change. No, the area is somewhat rural in nature. C. There is a community need for the proposed rezoning. (i.) What will the proposed zoning be? PUD (fi.) Why does the community need this zoning? A small retail farm to market store would be a unique addition for the city. D. The proposed change is consistent with, and in furtherance of, the implementation of the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, other adopted plans, and the policies, intents and requirements of this Ordinance and other City regulations and guidelines. Old Cedar City is a mix of industrial and recreational uses. A small retail farm to market store would be a unique destination for the area. Page 2 of 6 E. The proposed zoning is compatible with the zoning and uses of property nearby. Property North - Agricultural Property South - Recreational Property East - Industrial Property West - Agricultural F. Public and community facilities, which may include, but are not limited to, sanitary and storm sewers, water, electrical service, police and fire protection, schools, parks and recreation facilities, roads, libraries, and solid waste collection and disposal, are available and adequate to serve uses authorized under the proposed zoning. List public and community facilities available on the site. All necessary utilities and services are suitable for the proposed building. G. A traffic impact analysis has been provided to indicate the potential number of new trips generated and provisions are provided to mitigate impacts of high traffic -generating projects. (See Section 35-60.Traffic Impact Analysis regarding vehicle trip thresholds and traffic impact analysis requirements) A traffic impact analysis is not required. The use would be low traffic. H. Authorized uses shall not adversely affect the capacity or safety of the street network in the vicinity of the property. (i.) Describe the proposed use. Retail (if.) Will the proposed use adversely affect the capacity or safety of the street network in the vicinity of the property? Why/why not? No, suitable driveways and traffic circulation would be installed. I. Potential environmental impacts (e.g., excessive storm water runoff, water pollution, air pollution, noise pollution, excessive lighting, or other environmental harms) of authorized uses shall be mitigated. List any potential environmental impacts and how they will be mitigated. The site development would comply with all necessary requirements. J. There is an adequate supply of land available in the subject area and the surrounding community to accommodate the zoning and community needs. This would be a unique retail outlet in an agricultural setting. K. Benefits shall be derived by the community or area proposed to be rezoned. List the benefits of the proposed rezoning. The community would benefit from the unique retail destination. Page 3 of 6 City of Jefferson Department of Planning & Protective Services 320 E. McCarty Street Jefferson City, MO 65101 Phone: 573-634-6410 JCPlanning(a)ieffersoncitymo.gov www.jeffersoncitymo.gov APPLICATION FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) ❑Concept PUD Plan ❑ Amendment to Final PUD Plan ® Preliminary PUD Plan ❑ Amendment to Final PUD Plan for Signage ❑ Final PUD Plan PUD Project Name: ► ` 5cks-c -Fa ciry\ MC-C61 StreetAddress: W b Cedar C t+\4^D Kt ve, Legal Description: (as follows or is attached) <See C14ac-61d Please attach or include the following: a) Typed project narrative describing the type and character of the development, including land uses, acreage, proposed residential densities or commercial floor area (FAR); public or private open space, amenities or recreation areas to be provided; sidewalks and pedestrian ways; parking areas; deviations from minimum design standards of Section 35-51; and other information required by Section 35-74 or applicable sections of the Zoning Code. The project title and location must be included upon every page. Number all pages and attachments. b) Site Plan and/or Development Plan, as applicable. c) Preliminary or Final Subdivision Plat or Declaration of Condominium Association, as applicable; d) Draft of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions, as applicable; e) Traffic impact analysis, if required by Section 35-60; f) Signage Plan, including type, locations and dimensions of all proposed signs; g) Landscaping and Screening Plan; h) Lighting Plan, including pole heights, type of fixtures or luminaries, and foot candles; i) Project Phasing Plan (if applicable) j) Application Filing Fee = $500 + $200 advertising fee + $20 per acre + $250 rezoning fee (if applicable) (Revised July 1, 2018) Application Information: Property Owner: ::�oog mbeC ly Address i qt7!F-i Me- n nc-+. Ze-1 q;;4 'o..- Phone Number(s): 5-17 3 Applicant Name (if different from owner): Address Phone Number(s): Consulta Address: Phone N The atta ed inf ation accurately represents this proposed project I- P perty Owner Signature Printed Name/Title Date Consultant Signature Printed Name/Title Date For Staff Use Only: Application Filing Fee Received Amount OCheck # Attachments: Narrative,D Site Plan Applicant/Project Information Sheet -Note other information submitted on back page Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. Pagel of 7 PUD Narrative Fischer Farm Market Preliminary PUD Plan 1120 Cedar City Drive 12-19-22 Fischer Farms is planning to place a retail farm to market store on the corner of Oil Well Road and Cedar City Drive. The store would consist of a 2880 square foot building and is planned to focus on sale of agricultural produce and made in Missouri products. The exterior of the building would be a mixture of metal and timber resembling a rustic barn. The building would face the intersection, and would include retail floor area, freezer space, and restroom. A gravel parking lot is planned with driveway entrances off of both streets. Seasonal display of items outdoors is planned. A future greenhouse and other accessory structures are planned to be constructed on site. In lieu of standard parking lot landscaping trees, produce trees (such as apple trees) or other agricultural plantings are planned. The parking area is planned to be gravel, with driveway connections to both roads paved per city driveway standards. Although the purpose of this application and building is for a farm to market style retail store. We would request an underlying zoning of C-1 Commercial for the purpose of determining future permitted land uses. Signage for the operation will consist of building mounted signs on the front and back. Any future signage would adhere to the allowances of the C-1 zoning district. Exterior lighting would consist of building mounted lights. The property is planned to be divided off from the remainder of the 25 acre farm at a future date. Area proposed for PUD rezoning is 350' square located at the corner of Cedar City Drive and Oil Well Road. Filing Fee: Rezoning Fee 250 PUD Plan 500 Advertising Fee 200 TOTAL $950 uj r- N BLE j a a w i o z id r 51 Q: I — W i N I N O SUl W n 3 m4 a _J •�i o � i I I i I ° o i i i ro LU > 3Q ' I U1 � O J H a a ®r' SSD21�J .IZJ.br13 ,qL � Jay & Kim Fischer Rezoning Description M-1 to PUD Part of a tract of land described in Book M449, page 961 Callaway County Recorder's Office, being part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 9, Township 44 North, Range 11 West, in the City of Jefferson, Callaway County, Missouri, more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the northeasterly right of way line of Cedar City Drive (known formerly as Route 63, or Route 7), said point being located 50.00 feet left of said Cedar City Drive at Sta. 266+70.00, as per the Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission Plans of Job No. 5-P-63-20B; thence along said Highway plan right of way line, and along the boundary of said property described in Book M449, page 961 the following courses: S78'54'25"E, 134.58 feet, to a point 40.00 feet right of Oilwell Road (Service Road Connector per Highway Plans), Sta. 21+50; thence N56°04'11"E, along the northwesterly right of way of said Oilwell Road, 255.04 feet; thence leaving said Oilwell Road right of way line and the boundary of said property described in Book M449, page 961, N33°57'08"W, 350.00 feet; thence S56-06'23"W, 350.00 feet to a point on the northeasterly right of way line of said Cedar City Drive and the boundary of said property described in Book M449, page 961; thence along the northeasterly right of way line of said Cedar City Drive, and the boundary of said property described in Book M449, page 961, the following courses: on a curve to the right, having a radius of 1196.30 feet, an arc distance of 17.83 feet (the chord of said curve being S34°19'14"E, 17.83 feet) to a point 50.00 feet left of PT Sta. 264+42.40 as per Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission Plans of Job No. MO-269A; thence S33°53'37"E, 237.20 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. City of Jefferson Department of Planning & Protective Services 320 E. McCarty St. Jefferson City, MO 65101 December 27, 2022 Dear Property Owner: Carrie Temin, Mayor Sonny Sanders, AICP, Director Phone: 573-634-6410 Fax: 573-634-6457 This letter is to notify you that the Jefferson City Planning and Zoning Commission will meet at 5:15 p.m. on Thursday, January 12, 2023 in the Council Chambers of the John G. Christy Municipal Building, 320 East McCarty Street to consider the following matters (see map on back): Case No. P23001 —1110 Cedar City Drive, Rezoning from M-1 to PUD and Preliminary Planned Unit Development (PUD) Site Plan. Request filed by Jay and Kimberly Fischer, property owners, for rezoning of approximately 3 acres from M-1 Light Industrial to PUD Planned Unit Development and a Preliminary PUD Development Plan for a farm to market retail store. The property is located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Cedar City Drive and Oil Well Road and is described as Part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 9, Township 44 North, Range 11 West, in the City of Jefferson, Callaway County, Missouri. (Central Missouri Professional Services, Consultant). As a nearby landowner and/or neighbor, you are being provided notice of this hearing. Unfortunately, we are unable to record comments received by telephone, however, written comments may be directed to the Planning and Zoning Commission in one of the following ways: e-mail: JCPlanning@jeffersoncitymo.gov fax: Dept. of Planning and Protective Services / Planning Division 573-634-6457 mail: Dept. of Planning and Protective Services / Planning Division John G. Christy Municipal Building, 320 E. McCarty Street Jefferson City, MO 65101 Written comments received on or before 1:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting will be made a part of the official record and copied and distributed to Commission members at the meeting. Those unable to provide written comments in advance are invited to deliver their comments to the Commission Chairman only at the meeting. Correspondence received after 1:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting will be included in the official record, but there is no guarantee that copies will be made for distribution to all Commission members. For your information, this case is tentatively scheduled for a public hearing in front of the City Council on February 20, 2023. The City Council meets at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the John G. Christy Municipal Building, 320 East McCarty Street. Information regarding this case may be viewed on the Planning and Zoning Commission webpage at: https://www.meffersoncitVmo.gov/government/pIanning/planning and zoning commission php Please contact the Planning and Zoning Division via phone at 573.634.6573 with pertinent questions. Best Regards, Kortney Bliss Planner 1 Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. Please call (573) 634-6410 with questions regarding agenda items. Case No. P23001 1110 Cedar City Drive Rezoning from M-1 to PUD and Preliminary PUD Plan 185 ft. Notification Buffer ti _W J 'Cr —FIFTH ST LL IF0 0 0 0 O �: [E[[IT O F- 0 U 11, N W ® E S 0 70 140 280 420 560 Feet H�,Y63 O��w�CC RQ_ \Y 63 FI- Jefferson City Planning and Zoning Commission Property Owner list Case No. P23001 1110 Cedar City Drive 12/28/22 KORTE SALES LLC 1129 Cedar City Dr. JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 CARTER, GEORGE D. & BARBARAJ 1010 SANDSTONE ST. ST. JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 JEFFERSON HAULING & DISTRIBUTING CO 1020 CEDAR CITY DR. JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 Jefferson City Planning &Zoning Commission January 12, 2023 Case No. P23002 2200 Block of St. Mary's Boulevard MATEJO, LLC 1. Rezoning from C-2 General Commercial to RA-2 High Density Residential 2. Preliminary Subdivision Plat Doty of Jefferson Nannong l Zonong Commissuon LOCATT ON MAP ' M-2 • ♦ 'e.• j(! . I I Ill , Tn .;TZ '`- .�•� : 1:' *•• ^'k3 �,+. � dX •RTA`n i La.�`y,.� +.:Fy. r. '1 - r,.� � �.rt. r �ti r ti��. 2285..40 z r 1 ' rP 1• Nk l � k. r C-2 R J -- - I�tl� �•11 r — "�? fr. _ ._ SOURd•BL-VD - - __ Case No. P23002 0 120 240 480 Feet 2200 Block of St. Mary's Boulevard Rezoning from C-2 to RA-2 and Preliminary Subdivision Plat N W ; E S City of Jefferson Planning and Zoning Commission MISSOURI X VICINITY Case No. P23002 2200 Block of St. Mary's Boulevard 0 230 460 920 Feet Rezoning from C-2 to RA-2 and Preliminary Subdivision Plat N W r E S PLANNING STAFF REPORT JEFFERSON CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION January 12, 2023 Case No. P23002 — 2200 Block of St. Mary's Boulevard, Rezoning from C-2 to RA-2 and Preliminary Subdivision Plat. Request filed by MATEJO, LLC, property owner, for a rezoning of 9.09 acres from C-2 General Commercial to RA-2 High Density (Multi -Family) Residential and a preliminary subdivision plat consisting of 25 lots. The property is located northwest of the intersection of St. Mary's Boulevard and Heisinger Road and is described as Part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 11, Township 44 North, Range 12 West, in the City of Jefferson, Cole County, Missouri. (Central Missouri Professional Services, Consultant). Nature of Request A request was filed for both a zoning map amendment and preliminary plat for a parcel having 9.09 acres. The parcel is located along the 2200 Block of St. Mary's Boulevard and is currently zoned C-2 General Commercial. The owner desires to rezone this property from C-2 General Commercial to RA-2 High Density (Multi -Family) Residential; matching the zoning designation of the property to the east. A preliminary plat consisting of 25 lots was submitted by the applicant. The plat and other application materials suggest the proposed land use to be duplexes. Review and Approval Process: In accordance with the City Code, rezoning requests are reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Planning and Zoning Commission makes a recommendation to the City Council and City Council comes to a final decision. The Planning and Zoning Commission are the entity responsible for reviewing and coming to a final decision concerning preliminary plat proposals. Zoning History The Planning and Zoning Commission did have one prior case involving the property as part of the current request in addition to some property adjacent west. The case occurred in 1984 and was an application for a rezoning from RA-2 to C-2. Documentation from the case file suggests that the applicant of the case desired to rezone the property for the ability to make the property more suitable for development with respect to factors such as character of the area and terrain of the property. Zoning And Surrounding Land Use Current Zoning: C-2 Current Use: Undeveloped Requested Zoning: RA-2 Intended Use: Duplex/Multi Familv Development Surrounding Zoning Surrounding Uses North M-2 Highway 50 South C-2 Office, Parkin East RA-2 Multi Family Residential West C-2 Distribution Business Allowed Uses- Permitted uses within the RA-2 zoning district include single family, duplexes, multi -family buildings including large apartments, and assisted living facilities. Review Criteria for Rezoning: Section 35-74 B.4, lists review criteria for consideration of an amendment to the zoning ordinance text and zoning map. This case involves an amendment to the zoning map. The applicant has provided written responses to the review criteria for a rezoning. See attached application materials. City staff have also provided responses to the review criteria in the next section. Staff Analvsis of Rezoning Proposal: Standard checklist for rezoning: Yes No Notes: The existing zoning was in error at the time of X The Future Land Use Map of the adoption. Comprehensive Plan calls out the area to be used for suburban mixed use which includes multi -family uses. There has been a change in character in the area X The area to the east has developed due to installation of public facilities, other zone primarily in a multi -family manner. changes, new growth trends, neighborhood deterioration, or development transitions. There is a community need for the proposed X The proposed rezoning would rezoning. establish a zoning designation suitable for and which would allow the addition of multi family housing options in the city. The proposed change is consistent with, and in X The proposed rezoning would furtherance of, the implementation of the goals and conform to the standards of the policies of the comprehensive plan, other adopted Zoning Code and aligns with the plans, and the policies, intents and requirements of goals and objectives of the adopted this ordinance and other City regulations and comprehensive plan. guidelines The proposed zoning is compatible with the zoning X The rezoning and proposed land use and uses of property nearby. is compatible with multi -family uses to the east. Standard checklist for rezoning: Yes No Notes: Public and community facilities, which may X Existing facilities and services exist include, but are not limited to, sanitary and storm in the vicinity. sewers, water, electrical service, police and fire protection, schools, parks and recreation facilities, roads, libraries, and solid waste collection and disposal, are available and adequate to serve uses authorized under the proposed zoning. Authorized uses shall not adversely affect the X The nearby road network and capacity or safety of the street network in the proposed roadway should have the vicinity of the property. capacity in order to facilitate the use's traffic impacts. Potential environmental impacts (e.g., excessive X Potential environmental impacts of storm water runoff, water pollution, air pollution, the site have and will further be noise pollution, excessive lighting, or other reviewed by city staff with respect environmental harms) of authorized uses shall be to the City Code. mitigated. There is an adequate supply of land available in the X The property to be rezoned should subject area and the surrounding community to be adequate and able to accommodate the zoning and community needs. accommodate zoning and community needs. There is a need for more multi -family property in the community. Benefits shall be derived by the community or area X Rezoning of the subject site would proposed to be rezoned provide a proposed use which has the potential to benefit the community with an increase in availabie of multi famil housin . Preliminary Plat The preliminary subdivision plat is subject to and receives review with respect to City Code requirements laid out in Chapter 33 The Subdivision Code and Chapter 35 Zoning Code. A rezoning approval to a RA-2 designation requires the subdivision to comply with density and dimensional standards of that particular district. This includes lot size and width specifications. Proposed Subdivision Name: St. Marys Circle Subdivision Acreage: The total size of the subdivision is 9.09 acres. Number of Lots: 25 lots are shown on the Final Plat. Lot Sizes: According to the final subdivision plat submitted by the applicant, lot size as well as shape will vary with lot 6 being the largest at 0.62 acre and lots 17, 18, 19, 22, 23, and 24 being the smallest at 0.20 acres. Mail Service: Means of mail service for the subdivision appear to not be yet determined. This can be determined at a later date. It is likely that the subdivision will be served by cluster boxes Sidewalks: Sidewalks are proposed for the frontage along St. Mary's Boulevard and one side of the proposed roadway. Parking: The proposed street width would support parking on one side of the street. Parking is typically permitted on the same side as the sidewalk in residential subdivisions. Streets: A new roadway named St. Marys Circle is proposed. The right-of-way is shown as 60' and the road itself being 28' in width. Such roadway would need to conform to all applicable city standards. Traffic: A traffic impact analysis is not triggered for the proposed 25 duplex development. The Zoning Code requires a traffic impact analysis for 50 duplexes or more. Utilities: Fire hydrants, street lights, water, sewer, gas, electric, and etc. are shown on the plan and are subject to review and comments from staff both in the preliminary and final phases of the plat. Staff Recommendation Rezoning from C-2 General Commercial to RA-2 in addition to the proposed multi family use is suitable and compatible with uses in the area and is in conformance with the future land use plan in the Comprehensive Plan. The rezoning would increase the multi family housing within the City of Jefferson. Subject to the technical comments of city staff, the preliminary subdivision plat appears to meet applicable requirements of the City Code. Form of Motion 1. Motion to recommend approval to City Council of the proposed rezoning from C-2 General Commercial to RA-2 High Density Residential. 2. Motion to approve the Preliminary Subdivision Plat of St. Marys Circle Subdivision with the following conditions: a. Address technical comments of city staff. Jefferson City Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Engineering Division Staff Report Thursday, January 12, 2023, 5:15pm Item 6. — New Business/ Public Hearings Case No. P23002 — Preliminary Subdivision Plat, St. Mary's Circle Subdivision, 2200 Block of St. Mary's Blvd. (Existing RA-2 Zoning) ENGINEERING STAFF RECOMMENDATION - Recommend approval, subject to technical corrections being addressed on documents prior to the final plat being submitted for consideration. Existing Infrastructure Summary • Public infrastructure exists along St. Mary's Blvd. • Storm water facilities exist in the vicinity. • Sanitary sewer facilities exist in the vicinity. • Sidewalk does not exist in the vicinity. Improvements Summary Roadway • St. Mary's Circle is proposed as a local street serving 25 two (2) unit lots. • The street is proposed as a 28' wide street, no parking to be allowed on one (1) side of the roadway. Storm Water / Erosion Control • A storm water detention/ storm water quality basin will be located at the northeast corner of the subdivision. • A proposed drainage system will collect all drainage from the subdivision and direct it to the basin indicated. • An erosion and sediment control plan has will be needed as a part of future infrastructure plans. • See the enclosed email regarding specific comments needing addressed on the preliminary plat regarding these facilities. Sanitary Sewer • All proposed lots in this development are to be served by a new sanitary sewer main extension that ties to the existing main at the northeast portion of the subdivision. Sidewalk • Sidewalk is proposed along one (1) side of St. Mary's s Circle. Sidewalk is proposed along the frontage of St. Mary's Blvd. • p.2 Fire Hydrants / Street Lights/ Utilities • Facilities proposed within the subdivision are in accordance with City standards. • See the enclosed email regarding specific comments needing addressed on the preliminary plat regarding these facilities. Review Status of Documents - The preliminary plat has been reviewed and, with the items listed on the attached email being addressed on the plat by the consultant, will be in generally in good order. • These review comments referenced on the attached email have been sent back to the consultant for consideration, and will need to be addressed prior to Planning and Zoning approval. Wade, Shane From: Wade, Shane Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2023 12:41 PM To: Paul Samson Cc: Barron, Eric; Bliss, Kortney; Bonnot, Len Subject: Preliminary Plat for Joe Schepper's Property, 2200 Block St. Mary's Blvd.- "To be determined"- Planning and Engineering Review Comments Hi Paul - Please find below, our list of initial review comments for the preliminary plat, per our internal meeting/ review we had yesterday. After you have had a chance to look over the items, we (Eric, Cortney and 1) would like to have a phone call with you to discuss in further detail. Items are as follows- 1. The storm water detention/ water quality basin, as discussed during our pre -meeting, needs to be maintained by the City. It will need to be placed on a Reserved Tract for the City of Jefferson to maintain in the future, not a Lot to be developed for the subdivision. The Tract should have enough street frontage to allow for an all weather access driveway to be placed on the tract, similar to ones that you have proposed previously for other residential subdivisions within the City Limits. All of this should be shown/ identified on the preliminary plat. How does the drainage system drain into the basin? (It looks as if it is directed directly to MoDOT r/w. Will the street drainage/ eastern most draw from St. Mary's Blvd. also drain into this basin? What are the approximate limits/ general area of the basin at this location? DI-3 and DI-4 are shown as junction boxes on the plan, but area inlets with drainage area and flow noted in the drainage calculations. Please clarify. These items should be addressed, shown/ identified on the preliminary plat. Where will mail service be provided for the subdivision? (The Reserved Tract for the storm water basin could be an option). 4. Adequate sight distance should be identified at the two (2) street intersections with St. Mary's Blvd., both to the west and to the east from each intersection. 5. Driveway access restriction to St. Mary's Blvd. from Lot 1, 15, 16 and 25 should be noted, as access is indicated from the newly proposed street for each of these lots. The north side of St. Mary's Blvd. is currently signed as no parking. This should be noted on the plat. Street lights will be needed at the intersections of the new street with St. Mary's Blvd. It appears that that power poles will need to be relocated at these locations. The new power pole locations (if known) as well as intersection street lights will need to be shown on the plat. 7. Slope(s) of the proposed street should be identified on the plan. 8. A drainage area map should be provided for the drainage calculations shown. 9. The name of the street should be identified. 10. The name of the subdivision should be identified. 11. Is there a reason that there is a drainage easement exists between lots 16, 17, 18, 23,24 and 25? No drainage system is proposed in this area. We shall be in touch here in a little while. Thanks. Shane Shane Wade, PE Plan Review and Development Engineer City of Jefferson Dept. of Public Works Engineering Division 573.634.6449 O 573.634.6457 F swade(@ieffersoncitymo.gov City of Jefferson Department of Planning & Protective Services 320 E. McCarty Street Jefferson City, MO 65101 Phone: 573-634-6410 jco1anningrcDieffcit vmo. oro www.jeffersoncitymo.gov APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION PLAT The undersigned hereby petitions the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council of the City of Jefferson, Missouri for the following type of subdivision: X Preliminary Plat Final Plat 1. Name of Subdivision: TBD Subdivision 2. General location: 2200 Block of St. Marv's Blvd. 3. Existing/Proposed zoning: Existing: C-2 Proposed RA-2 4. Existing/Proposed use of the property: Existing: Vacant Proposed: Residential Duplex/apartment 5. Size of the property in acres: 9.09 Acres 6. Total number of lots proposed: 25 Lots 7. Description of any variances to the Subdivision Regulations being requested (please note section number of the regulation below and attach a letter stating justification for the variance(s): No Variances are proposed 8. Application filing fee: $ 625.00 Preliminary Plat = $500 + $5 per lot Final Plat = $350 + $5 per lot (Revised July 1, 2018) 9. Signatures: Joe Scheppers Rroperty Owner Name (type or print) Paul Samson, PE Engineer Name (type or print) Date Property Owner Signatu Si Minor Revision = $250 + $5 per lot to Preliminary Plat Date J. Brian Rockwell ,f/%/� Surveyor Name (type or print) -Survey-or Signature Date Contact person for this application: Name: Paul Samson,PE - CMPS Address: 2500 E. McCarty St. Jefferson City, MO 65101 Phone Number: 573-634-3455 Email: psamson@cmps-inc.com For Staff Use Only: Attachments: — Variance request letter Additional documentation Notes. Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required underthe Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. Page 1 of 5 City of Jefferson Department of Planning & Protective Services 320 E. McCarty Street Jefferson City, MO 65101 Phone: 573-634-6410 JCPlanninv(a)ieffersoncitymo. clov www.jeffersoncitymo.gov APPLICATION FOR ZONING AMENDMENTS The undersigned hereby petitions the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council of the City of Jefferson, Missouri, for the following amendment to the Zoning Code: RV Map Amendment Text Amendment (Include description of proposed text amendment) Property Address: 2200 St. Mary's Blvd. Jefferson City, MO 2. Applications for Map amendments shall include a location map and legal description. 3. This petition requests to rezone the above described real estate from its present classification of C_2 district to RA-2 district. The purpose of this rezoning request is to: Build an Apartment/Duplex Subdivision 4. Filing fee: Map Amendment = $650. Text Amendment = $450. 5. Required Findings: Applicant responses to the required findings shall be noted in Addendum A and vary based on type of request. 6. The undersigned certify to be all of the owner(s) of the above described property and that the submitted information (including all attachments to this application) is true and correct. (All own rs of this erty t sign and the signatures must be notarized). o Joe Scheppers/Owner ¢�- MM Property Owner Signature Printed Name/Title (type or print) 0 � o� O mU mW-- WZU)UN 23 Property Owner Signature Printed Name/Title (type or print) }.ALL cut >>¢z0 C > > LLJ O "c fifi f Subscribed and sworn before me this 13� day of ble C�P� h Zd Z Z �U � (15 F �0 Uot U T 'Notary Public For City Use Only: (Revised July 1, 2018) Application Filing Fee: Map Amendment = $650 ($450 + $200 Advertising Fee) Text Amendment = $450 ($250 + $200 Advertising Fee) Application Filin Fee Received: Cash (receipt # ) =Check (copy; check # ) Attachments: Addendum A 11 Map ElApplicant/Project Information Sheet Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or altemative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. Page 1 of 6 Jefferson City Zoning Amendment Application Addendum A — Review Criteria To be used to support zoning amendment requests. (Section 35-74.B.4) Property Address 2200 St. Mary's Blvd., Jefferson City, IVIO Applicant Name MATEJO, LLC - Joe Scheppers Provide responses to the following required findings by selecting all criteria that apply to your request. State all reasons for your answer and use additional pages to complete your answer if necessary. A. The existing zoning was in error at the time of adoption. Explain. There was not an error at the time the existing was adopted. B. There has been a change in character in the area due to installation of public facilities, other zone changes, new growth trends, neighborhood deterioration, or development transitions. Explain the change and be specific on which public facilities, other zone changes, new growth trends, neighborhood deterioration, or development transitions that effected the change. The current zoning was adopted due to the commercial nature of the adjacent properties to the west and the south. The proposed rezoning is an extension of the existing residential zoning to the east C. There is a community need for the proposed rezoning. (i.) What will the proposed zoning be? Residential Duplex/Apartment Subdivision (ii) Why does the community need this zoning? To increase Residential Housing D. The proposed change is consistent with, and in furtherance of, the implementation of the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, other adopted plans, and the policies, intents and requirements of this Ordinance and other City regulations and guidelines. The Comprehensive Plan shows this property as Suburban Mixed Use. The proposed RA-2 zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Page 2 of 6 E. The proposed zoning is compatible with the zoning and uses of property nearby. Property North — M-2 Property South — C-2 Property East — RA-2 Property West - C-2 F. Public and community facilities, which may include, but are not limited to, sanitary and storm sewers, water, electrical service, police and fire protection, schools, parks and recreation facilities, roads, libraries, and solid waste collection and disposal, are available and adequate to serve uses authorized under the proposed zoning. List public and community facilities available on the site. Sanitary Sewer- City of Jefferson Water Supply- Missouri American Electric- Ameren Gas- Ameren Telephone- Brightspeed G. A traffic impact analysis has been provided to indicate the potential number of new trips generated and provisions are provided to mitigate impacts of high traffic -generating projects. (See Section 35-60.Traffic Impact Analysis regarding vehicle trip thresholds and traffic impact analysis requirements) The size of the proposed development does not reach the threshold to require a Traffic Impact Analysis H. Authorized uses shall not adversely affect the capacity or safety of the street network in the vicinity of the property. (i.) Describe the proposed use. Residential Duplex/Apartment Complex Subdivision (ii.) Will the proposed use adversely affect the capacity or safety of the street network in the vicinity of the property? Why/why not? No, because East neighborhood already has RA-2 classification. The increased traffic volume will not excede treet capacity. I. Potential environmental impacts (e.g., excessive storm water runoff, water pollution, air pollution, noise pollution, excessive lighting, or other environmental harms) of authorized uses shall be mitigated. List any potential environmental impacts and how they will be mitigated. The primary impact will be increased storm water runoff. This will be mitigated by the construction of a storm water detention/water quality basin. J. There is an adequate supply of land available in the subject area and the surrounding community to accommodate the zoning and community needs. Yes K. Benefits shall be derived by the community or area proposed to be rezoned. List the benefits of the proposed rezoning. Increase Residential Housing Page 3 of 6 Rezoning Property Boundary Description 2200 St. Mary's Blvd. Jefferson City, MO PROPERTY BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION -TRACT 2 Part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 11, Township 44 North, Range 12 West, in the City of Jefferson, Cole County, Missouri, more particularly described as follows: From the northwest corner of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 11; thence S03°20'03"E, along the Quarter Section Line, 586.54 feet to a point on the southerly right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 50; thence easterly, along said southerly right-of-way line, on a curve to the right, having a radius of 2699.95 feet, an arc distance of 865.57 feet (Ch=N71°15'19"E, 861.87 feet) to the POINT OF BEGINNING for this description; thence easterly, continuing along said southerly right-of-way line of U.S. Highway 50, on a curve to the right, having a radius of 2699.95 feet, an arc distance of 622.93 feet (Ch=N87°02'56"E, 621.55 feet) to the Quarter Quarter Section Line; thence S3°02'00"E, along the Quarter Quarter Section Line, 545.88 feet to the northerly right-of-way line St. Mary's Boulevard; thence along said northerly right-of-way line the following courses: westerly, on a curve to the right, having a radius of 292.03 feet, an arc distance of 174.42 feet (Ch=S66°57'07"W, 171.84 feet); thence S84°03'46"W, 193.72 feet; thence westerly, on a curve to the right having a radius of 708.86 feet, an arc distance of 304.51 feet (Ch=N83°37'50"W, 302.18 feet); thence N71*19'27"W, 48.25 feet; thence leaving said northerly right-of-way line, N16°30'23"E, 130.12 feet; thence N1'22'35"E, 426.82 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 9.09 acres. 40 Cole County, Missouri NOTES: Rezone C-2 to RA-2 500 1000 City of Jefferson, Missouri A North Legend _. Address - Land HaP: —I Cdy Limits LJ County Boundaries Parcels Subduisions Parcel data is for assessment purposes only. It is not a legal survey and does not purport to represent a property boundary survey of the parcels shown. It should not be used for conveyances or the establishment of property boundaries. Do not use Printed on 7217212022 (or navigation. '.:` .. N IQmossm,uNnoO awe -tea Oral l0[59 IarlosSIN 'Ulo NOsaa3A3I ssK-rn (crU uxvo=N •a JIM ONWS34 mymzLYR - ONLUMIS - ONNI3311I91,13 0uI 'saoleaaS iea0}ssa10ad unosslyy iea•}uaD W 1. 3100',UD NOSa3333P 'oA1G SCAM ISNo018 OOZZ S83dd3HOS 30f IIa3NIWN313a 38 011l 1H-Id ANVNIWIl3�ld i p -b s ZH g g r— a 'aa x a of n fie .ao m'O '-am W MOW Zp Q F' Z 0 a W Q '� C 8 '�y Yry NbYlaON __ 'Oil fy a3ON1513 C•-I •_m0 Z _3 { t!, F E.ffCC e5B53 1 Q'i _ Z N N y0 kS $Sg 3SS Y9 % U .y W_ N>-LL mU �/ A W paN N CAJ� o sg 'Eygz �.55 ` •' GG S9 avp 1; a<U' N y �>Q OU�.p ! aa{E yli E� SE apl JJ'� •. G W wZ w ; m m � a E '" xgD E �s %. € fin' N o E Z V p W .7 aoQ O.O m (A °Ln .Al S2g P«Q �c e�pFs� iFVs C/� a own 3 L d p ~' o n' a ' rR n= �a G3�RS Ea€� S8 w iE '€ V .: w a a zll o a � g a gg Nd��o V INS \\\ kkkk kk \mNO \ �� : \ `•. i \ \\\ \ \ Ar p� \�\\\\.�-7•;—"r--.--�'l�.aaa-\i ��r((\ I �)\,\\Ily''1`a,. (��i \ N`EI$15D ERA 1. �l (uxai Wvxam a' 11 `� _ / jj // -- �� '�aNswe+j.sLti_ /_L/ ��%. -: ,H - •� =-- _ �\ �I�/ .l r - — r 7- — 1 l k" F City of Jefferson Department of Planning & Protective Services 320 E. McCarty St. Jefferson City, MO 65101 December 27, 2022 Dear Property Owner: Carrie Tergin, Mayor Sonny Sanders, AICP, Director Phone: 573-634-6410 Fax: 573-634-6457 This letter is to notify you that the Jefferson City Planning and Zoning Commission will meet at 5:15 p.m. on Thursday, January 12, 2023 in the Council Chambers of the John G. Christy Municipal Building, 320 East McCarty Street to consider the following matters (see map on back): Case No. P23002 — 2200 Block of St. Mary's Boulevard, Rezoning from C-2 to RA-2 and Preliminary Subdivision Plat. Request filed by MATEJO, LLC, property owner, for a rezoning of 9.09 acres from C-2 General Commercial to RA-2 High Density (Multi -Family) Residential and a preliminary subdivision plat consisting of 25 lots. The property is located northwest of the intersection of St. Mary's Boulevard and Heisinger Road and is described as Part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 11, Township 44 North, Range 12 West, in the City of Jefferson, Cole County, Missouri. (Central Missouri Professional Services, Consultant). As a nearby landowner and/or neighbor, you are being provided notice of this hearing. Unfortunately, we are unable to record comments received by telephone, however, written comments may be directed to the Planning and Zoning Commission in one of the following ways: e-mail: JCPlanning@jeffersoncitymo.gov fax: Dept. of Planning and Protective Services / Planning Division 573-634-6457 mail: Dept. of Planning and Protective Services / Planning Division John G. Christy Municipal Building, 320 E. McCarty Street Jefferson City, MO 65101 Written comments received on or before 1:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting will be made a part of the official record and copied and distributed to Commission members at the meeting. Those unable to provide written comments in advance are invited to deliver their comments to the Commission Chairman only at the meeting. Correspondence received after 1.:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting will be included in the official record, but there is no guarantee that copies will be made for distribution to all Commission members. For your information, this case is tentatively scheduled for a public hearing in front of the City Council on February 20, 2023. The City Council meets at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the John G. Christy Municipal Building, 320 East McCarty Street. Information regarding this case may be viewed on the Planning and Zoning Commission webpage at: https://www.ieffersoncitymo.gov/qovernment/pIanning/planninq and zoning commission php Please contact the Planning and Zoning Division via phone at 573.634.6573 with pertinent questions. Best Regards, Kortney Bliss Planner 1 Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. Please call (573) 634-6410 with questions regarding agenda items. N Case No. P23O02 w �► E 2200 Block of St. Mary's Boulevard Rezoning from C-2 to RA-2 and Preliminary Subdivision Plat S 0 100 200 400 600 800 185 ft. Notification Buffer Feet o� o= �v a ❑ J a z 0 /lypU SrR�q� pR w a ❑ a J IL � z z x 0 0 c z 0 --_ W z H wYao S0 N ST MARYS BLVD R I I I WILLIAM ST O Q' � Q' MISSOURI BLVD CUDJ Q m z w w x Jefferson City Planning and Zoning Commission Property Owner list Case No. P23002 2200 Block of St. Mary's Boulevard BROOKE, JACOB 2120 ST MARYS BLVD #B-1 JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65109 2120 ST MARYS UNIT 131 BLVD MO 65109 CAPITOL TRACE L L C % JEFF W SCHAEPERKOETTER REGISTERED AGENT 320 NISHODSE BLUFF JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 2110 ST MARYS BLVD MO 65109 CINCINATTI CAPITAL PARTNERS 437 L L C ATTN:BUCHHEIT ENTERPRISES INC 33 PCR 540 PERRYVILLE, MO 63775 2304 MISSOURI BLVD MO 65109 CRABTREE, JAMES N & SARAH L 1711 SARAH LN JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 2120 ST MARYS UNIT B4 BLVD MO 65109 F& F DEVELOPMENT L L C PO BOX 105045 JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65110 321 NORMAN DR MO 65109 HOGAN, LOIS A 2120 ST MARYS BLVD UNIT B3 JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65109 2120 ST MARYS UNIT B3 BLVD MO 65109 IDEL, LARRY SHAWN & KIMBERLY M 3769 STATE ROAD AA HOLTS SUMMIT, MO 65043 2120 ST MARYS UNIT A6 BLVD MO 65109 J B J C PROPERTIES L L C PO BOX 1351 JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65102 2121 ST MARYS BLVD MO 65109 MATEJO L L C 849 WEATHERHILL RD JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65109 2217 ST MARYS BLVD MO 65109 12/29/22 MEHMERT, MATTHEW W 2120 ST MARYS BLVD #B2 JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65109 2120 ST MARYS UNIT B2 BLVD MO 65109 MILLER, FLOYD E JR 2120 ST MARYS BLVD #A5 JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65109 2120 ST MARYS UNIT A5 BLVD MO 65109 NEW STANDARD PROPERTIES L L C ATTN:DAVID J DRANE/DANIEL M BURKS 1200 1-70 DR SW COLUMBIA, MO 65203 400 DIX REAR RD MO 65109 PETTY, PATRICIA 2120 ST MARYS BLVD JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65109 2120 ST MARYS UNIT A2 BLVD MO 65109 RODEMAN, LINDA K 2120 ST MARYS BLVD UNIT Al JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65109 2120 ST MARYS UNIT Al BLVD MO 65109 Jefferson City Planning and Zoning Commission Property Owner list Case No. P23002 2200 Block of St. Mary's Boulevard 12/29/22 SMITH, EARL L JR 2120 ST MARYS BLVD #A3 JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65109 2120 ST MARYS UNIT A3 BLVD MO 65109 STERLING DEVELOPMENT GROUP INC 4605 APPLE TREE LN COLUMBIA, MO 65203 2108 ST MARYS BLVD MO 65109 THOMPSON, JOSHUA 2120 ST MARYS BLVD #A-4 JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65109 2120 ST MARYS UNIT A4 BLVD MO 65109 WEST APARTMENTS L L C % COLONIAL MANOR APTS 2111 DALTON DR UNIT B JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65109 2111 DALTON DR MO 65109 Jefferson City Planning &Zoning Commission January 12, 2023 Case No. P23003 309 & 311 Bolivar Street Capital Opportunity Fund, LLC Major PUD Plan Amendment Case Packet Contents 1. Vicinity and Location Maps 2. Application 3. Staff Report 4. Council Ordinance Approving Original PUD Plan (Oct. 2020) 5. Final PUD Site Development Plan (July 2021) 6. Original Preliminary PUD Application Packet (Aug. 2020) 7. Summary of Timeline and Correspondence 8. Correspondence/Timeline Packet (41 pages) 9. Surrounding Property Owner Notification CKy of Jefferson Planning & Zoning Commission LOCATION MAP Case No. P23003 309 & 311 Bolivar Street Major PUD Plan Amendment 0 35 70 140 Feet N W r E S City of Jefferson Planning and Zoning Commission Case No. P23003 309 & 311 Bolivar Street Major PUD Plan Amendment VICINITY 0 55 110 220 Feet N W r E S City of Jefferson Department of Planning & Protective Services y ; 320 E. McCarty Street i -\CEIVi Jefferson City, MO 65101 = Phone. 573-634-6410 JCPlanningggieffersoncitvr,70.g0 www.jeffersoncitymo.gov DEC 1 ? 2022 APPLICATION FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTk(PJDI ❑Concept PUD Plan ❑Preliminary PUD Plan ❑ Final PUD Plan PUD Project Name: C�a c;e No . P20007 r- �:1 nyl 21 Amendment to Final PUD Plan ❑ Amendment to Final PUD Plan for Signage Street Address: _309/311 Bolivar St Jefferson City, MO 65101 Legal Description: (as follows or is attached) _Abed Please attach or include the following: a) Typed project narrative describing the type and character of the development, including land uses, acreage, proposed residential densities or commercial floor area (FAR); public or private open space, amenities or recreation areas to be provided; sidewalks and pedestrian ways; parking areas; deviations from minimum design standards of Section 35-51; and other information required by Section 35-74 or applicable sections of the Zoning Code. The project title and location must be included upon every page. Number all pages and attachments. b) Site Plan and/or Development Plan, as applicable. c) Preliminary or Final Subdivision Plat or Declaration of Condominium Association, as applicable; d) Draft of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions, as applicable; e) Traffic impact analysis, if required by Section 35-60; f) Signage Plan, including type, locations and dimensions of all proposed signs; g) Landscaping and Screening Plan; h) Lighting Plan, including pole heights, type of fixtures or luminaries, and foot candles; i) Project Phasing Plan (if applicable) j) Application Filing Fee = $500 + $200 advertising fee + $20 per acre + $250 rezoning fee (if applicable) (Revised July 1, 2018) Application Information: Property Owner: Capital Opportunity Fund, LLC Address 320 Nishodse Blf. Jefferson City,MO 65101 Phone Number(s): 57:3_4(11 _7,1 4 Applicant Name (if different from owner): Address Phone Number(s): Consultant Na Phone Number(s): T e attache information a urately represents this p�opetj, proct e chaeperkoetter Managing Member OPVYrty Owner SignatLlre Printed Name/Title Consultant Signature rnn[ea Name/ I itle 12/12/2022 Date Date For Staff Use Only: Application Filing Fee Received Amount Check # Attachments: Narrative Site PlanD Applicant/Project Information Sheez 'Note other information submitted on back page Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. Page 1 of 7 Legal Description of Property Case No. P20007 309/311 Bolivar St. E $MBI The following parcel of land, lying: being and situate in Cole Counts• Missouri: The northerly part of Inlot No. 424 in the City of Jefferson, Missouri, an described as follows: d particulari, Beginning on the westerly line of said Inlot 10 feet northern: of the southwest said inlot_ thence northerly with the westerly line of said inlot 18$ feet 9 inc Southwesterly comer of comer thereof, thence easterly with the northerly Line of said inlot 104 feet 4-1/2 inches to the northwesterly northeasterhY corner of said inlot, thence southerly along inches to the inches: thence in a westerly direction along y the easterly line of said inlot 1;8 feet 9 place of beginning_ and with the northerly line of the railroad Iand to the M Amendment Narrative (Case No. P20007) 309/311 Bolivar St. The proposal is to amend the Final PUD Plan approved by the City by changing the number of parking spaces and orientation of parking in the parking area north of the building, between the building and W. Wall Way, a public alley. The Final Plan for this area is depicted on the attached Exhibit A. As shown, it provides for four parking spaces, two each at both the eastern and western edges of the parking area. Exhibit B depicts the parking area as it is proposed to be if the Amendment is approved. The proposed amendment would provide for 8 parking spaces in the same area, all to be pull -in parking from W. Wall Way. One handicapped space with an adjacent area for accessibility is included in both the approved and proposed parking area. Discussion The parking area proposed was included in a Site Plan for the property, and discussed at a pre -submission meeting between the owner and city staff. At that meeting, staff indicated that it would not recommend straight -in parking for approval by Planning and Zoning and the City Council, and staff now indicates that this change can only be approved through the major amendment process by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. The following policy suggestions are for the City's consideration as it processes this application: 1. The Owner's desire to optimize off-street parking will lessen the need for on -street parking in the area. The City's prior experience with parking issues in developed and developing areas should cause the City to encourage off-street parking, serving the business's needs and minimizing the impact on the neighborhood. 2. The Owner should have full and unfettered use of the West Wall Way access. It is a public way, and Ordinance No. 16083 already contains significant protections for the City against improper usage of the alleyway. 3. The Owner has previously raised this issue with the City and met with City staff at the site, and the only concerns expressed by staff, in denying the change, related to restrictions on emergency vehicles and access to the tower site at Fire Station 1. Owner believes the City has the ability, and perhaps the legal obligation, to provide for its emergency needs without limiting the public's use of a public way. It appears that the City has adequate space on its own property to provide for its access needs without limiting another property owner on its use of the public way. The Owner believes that the proposed change will not significantly impact the City or the public's use of W. Wall Way, and will improve traffic in the area by increasing on -site parking and reducing the need for use of on -street parking. Page 3 Exhibit A Final Site Plan Case No. P20007 309/311 Bolivar St. FINAL PUD Siff PLAN M . �.. — �•;.� � r`i�.�" ", .,. ��.,n�nN •-- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- --- - ... ---- --• POSED BUILD ---^.-a=---- v [r�............._..._.._....._..__.._._._._....... __ PRO [NG _............ fir.... x`: `:. ,.ue u. sw. 3091311 BMIVAR sL= Idfa GII. BD •� p .. sPR0 rcr Area- 029 at= fO:FM PUD A B y. .L0 mn ?. i y o��ra L.aav p ow a c _+ 1 e..au(a,anv ar-=r• maam � ^L'2� r _ . (cr PJiL 3 L,cIl .10 )IiT , y qc S[TE [ACATION O .n.r_.�. o.. ce. [. oy ea •--_'.-____. ____ ---- _- - -- __ aI 13 F_] ow ••..ram "• �: may' a. EP wrw ...,.v t�.a•+a. n. woa.osm+ ° ""`• •" �.>,.<a, wa J �z� r._/a _ B c m H a •9 o0� In lu T t 0 OO6 O a O m R$ Y cc Am STE PLAN �= I C100 om rar ac^s Ip r Exhibit B Proposed Amendment Case No. P20007 309/311 Bolivar St. CITY STAFF REPORT JEFFERSON CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION January 12, 2023 Case No. P23003 — 309 & 311 Bolivar Street, Amendment to PUD Plan. Request filed by Capital Opportunity Fund LLC, property owner, to amend the approved PUD Planned Unit Development plan to change the number and orientation of parking spaces located on the north side of the property adjacent to West Wall Way. The property is located on the northeast corner of the intersection of West McCarty Street and Bolivar Street and is described as the northerly part of Inlot No. 424, in the City of Jefferson, Cole County, Missouri. Nature of Request The development of the property was approved via the PUD Plan approval process. The building on the property is a two-story building, with the lower level consisting of a coffee shop and roastery and upper level including a one -unit short term rental/apartment. The property owner is requesting an amendment to the approved PUD Plan with respect to the number and orientation of parking spaces adjacent to the alley. The Final PUD plan shows 4 parking spaces accessed via a short driveway with access to the alley. The proposed amendment shows 8 head in parking spaces accessed from the alley. City Staff have determined that the requested amendment does not qualify as a Minor PUD amendment, and directed the property owner to the Major PUD Plan amendment process. History and Sequence of Development Approvals The Preliminary PUD Plan for the development was heard by the Planning and Zoning Commission on September 16, 2020, and subsequently approved by the City Council on October 19, 2020. Specific concerns by Fire Department staff regarding the arrangement of parking and access to the ally were discussed with the applicant/property owner prior to the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting and again prior to City Council meeting. Specific comments by the Fire Department included a need for a physical barrier (such as a curbed island) and fire lane striping along the alley. The approving City Council ordinance included specific requirements with respect to the access and use of the alley that were negotiated between Fire Department/Law Department staff and the property owner and inserted as an amendment to the Council Bill. The Preliminary PUD Site Plan included a small parking area with driveway access off of the alley and space for two vehicles (one regular and one handicap space). The Final PUD Development plan for the property was administratively approved by City Staff in July of 2021. The Final PUD Plan included a change in the number of parking spaces at the rear of the building, increasing the number of parking spaces from 2 to 4, which was negotiated between the property owner and Fire Department staff and deemed approvable within the Final PUD Plan administrative approval process. Curbing to separate the parking lot from the alley was shown to be installed on one half of the parking lot (the portion closer to Bolivar Street) and not installed on the other half (where a stripped loading zone area for a handicap parking space would serve as the separating barrier along the alley). The approved curbing was planned by Fire Administration to be visually marked as a fire lane to further restrict parallel parking in the alley and eliminate conflict with emergency access. On May 16, 2022, City staff recognized that the parking area was not installed according to the Final PUD Plan, with the concrete curbing along a portion of the parking area missing. Upon inquiry, the property owner stated their intent to pursue an amendment to the PUD Plan to permit the parking lot as constructed (without the island) and with head in parking spaces accessed from the alley. The applicant submitted an application for a PUD Plan Amendment, which was heard by the Panning and Zoning Commission in August of 2022. Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval subject to installation of signage to identify the parking as intended for use by employees and tenants of the short term rental only. The request was heard by the City Council in September of 2022. The PUD Amendment was not approved by the City Council. Subsequent to the City Council decision, the parking lot was installed according to the Final PUD Plan. Staff Analysis The alley adjacent to the site serves as access to the rear of Fire Station Number 1. In addition to the unique access needs associated with the public emergency service nature of the fire station, Fire Station One houses the emergency response watercraft used when responding to emergency situations on the Missouri River or other water emergencies. For these reasons, the nature of access to the alley has been a major item of concern and negotiation between the owner and Fire Department personnel. Specific staff concerns are: 1. That the orientation of the parking spaces will have a higher possibility of obstructing the alley. The head in parking would rely on the public alley for circulation (pulling in and backing out of cars) whereas a small parking lot with driveway access would only rely on the alley for driveway access, not the circulation of specific vehicles accessing parking spaces. 2. That the increased number of parking spaces will result in a higher level of traffic in the alley and a higher possibility of affecting emergency dispatch of vehicles. During Preliminary PUD Plan consideration and approval, and subsequent administrative approval of the Final PUD Development Plan, multiple discussions took place between the owner and Fire Department representatives regarding concerns about the impact of the development on the adjacent alley. Specific restrictions regarding use of the alley were negotiated through the Law Department and incorporated into the bill approving the Preliminary PUD Plan. Potential impacts on emergency vehicle use in the alley have been an overriding concern with respect to development of this property since the initial predevelopment meeting in August of 2020, with multiple meetings and emails taking place regarding this subject. Please see attached summary of timeline and correspondence. Staff Recommendation: Fire Department personnel are concerned that the revised parking arrangement could impact emergency response. Use of zoning powers to regulate the level of access to public right-of-way, especially where essential public services are heavily reliant on such right-of-way, is appropriate. Because the currently approved parking configuration was an essential condition of staff's previous support and approval of the original PUD plan, staff cannot recommend an amendment away from the previously negotiated parking solution. Approve Not Approve Neutral Staff Recommendation X Form of Motion (all motions shall be positive, staff does not recommend approval of the required motion) Motion to recommend approval to the City Council of the proposed PUD Plan Amendment. Attachments: - Ordinance 16083 — City Council approval of Preliminary PUD Plan, including: o Specific restrictions on parking/use of the alley (contained within ordinance text) o Preliminary PUD Site Plan o Building Floor Plan - Final PUD Site Plan (administratively approved by staff) - Preliminary PUD Application packet - Summary of timeline and correspondence AS AMENDED BILL NO. 2020-034 SPONSORED BY Councilmember Graham ORDINANCE NO. 6 61 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON APPROVING A PRELIMINARY PUD PLAN FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 311 BOLIVAR STREET. WHEREAS, Oakbrook Properties LLC, owner of the real estate hereinafter described having submitted a Preliminary PUD Plan Amendment of said real estate described as follows; The northerly part of Inlot No. 424 in the City of Jefferson, Missouri, more particularly described as follows: Beginning on the westerly line of said Inlot 10 feet northerly of the southwesterly corner of said Inlot, thence northerly with the westerly line of said Inlot 188 feet 9 inches to the northwesterly corner thereof, thence easterly with the northerly line of said Inlot 104 feet, 4.5 inches to the northeasterly corner of said Inlot, thence southerly along the easterly line of said Inlot 138 feet, 9 inches, thence in a westerly direction along and with the northerly line of the railroad land to the place of beginning. Containing 0.38 acres, more or less; and WHEAEAS, it appears that the procedures set forth in the Zoning Code relating to Planned Unit Developments have in all matters been complied with, as said property owner submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council a Preliminary PUD Plan for the above referenced property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Preliminary PUD Plan, on file as Case No. P20007 in the Jefferson City Planning Division is hereby approved for the land referenced above. Section 2. Permitted Land Uses. Permitted uses for the property shall be limited to Roastery, Short Term and Long Term Residential Rental, General Retail, Coffee Shop, and any permitted uses of the C-2 zoning district. Signage and lighting shall adhere to the allowances of the C-2 zoning district. Section 3. Common Areas and Public Land. No common areas are proposed and no lands are dedicated to public use with this PUD Plan. Section 4. The public alleyway known as "W. Wall Way" (the "alleyway") shall be designated as "no parking" from the intersection of the alleyway and Bolivar St. to the eastern property line of the subject property. The alleyway shall not be used in the operations of any commercial or residential use on the subject property in that no owner or occupant of the subject property shall suggest, encourage, or, with knowledge, allow or permit vendors, customers, tenants, or invitees to park, idle, or block the alleyway at any time. Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed (1) to prohibit the use of the alleyway for general vehicular or pedestrian access to the parking lot on the subject property which is directly adjacent to the alleyway; (2) to prohibit ingress and egress along any point of the alleyway adjacent to the subject property; (3) to prohibit the owner or occupant from trash service pickup along the alleyway; or (4) to criminalize or otherwise force any vehicular user to not comply with any traffic regulations of the City of Jefferson, such as stopping at stop signs or yielding to pedestrians. Furthermore, nothing in this paragraph shall require the owner or occupant of the subject property to enforce the parking, idling, or blocking restriction in any way other than making a reasonable effort to obtain voluntary compliance and, if unsuccessful, reporting the suspected violation to the City of Jefferson for either police or towing action. Section 5. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval. Presiding Officer ATTEST: i City Clerk Approved: Q i� , 2012 0 2O ��►` :Eel Mayor Carrie Tergin APPROVED AS TO FORM: City At#'oy warww IHfIOSSIW'A1NA003100'AUDNOSH33z3f ots S W��'• W > v - 4'�I wa` 133H1S HVAIIOB llS/60S 6 > CL e5ea-tt9 (i[t) SSK-H9 (Cts) IOISB NI(1O55U1 'ALJ N0533d13t AIM-K 1009Z t `�Yt . R 011 'S31183dOHd NOOHGNVO e - M o O J O kn - o 6 'JNL= S'IVM31YR - 'JNIA3MrIS - 'JNMaNION3 auI 'saatAlaS FUOISSa;oad !-MOSS[N je11u90 „ hs «- a (� l J u J Eftai I Ie Q7SOa OOO i d Fy Q p w a as en 6 0., w ra o V If: Il '�' L Q " PI ti CD die-;Y•/�� n ; : W s _ ---x-- I rT jai Mog I ---------- I $ -- c — — fi - — " T ------------- - - - ,/ F L re: III 0 .1¢' �aaiTg 6�aa�oR leaµ w A ry " a Z I • �� w�,� O I I I 1 S �------------------------------ I-� ✓f UO a f I E \ i IHnosSIW'Amnoo MOO MO NOSH3JJ3r 133H1S HVAI100 L LEWC o N. J 6 Q # 86 -K9 (cis) SSK-KB (CLS) SOISB OIOOSSIII '.M N0- GGGzt x.wrs=n 'a Dosz 'mot i ..� � �5 ' eft.12 011 'S3111i3dOHd NOOHGAVO z " - = qZ C Co- g T- 'g C DNIJRdl SIYRIaEYR - D=Uuns - DNINaaN[DN3 r 61S 4 JNI(nne a3Sodoad F v e 'DUI 'SgZ)L @S IPUOTSS@Joj l 1MOSSINj jea}uao 8i E .'7 >:N :_:/'�..; �1QOob $ I II R I il; I �k I O f ;I: I I y 111, I :a yts I I -1 •� �_, o� o.I B �\!`''� ►o oa o e N . :P: o39s; 9106 Fgna INN I Mill =qq �i I y o "s 15 Idg ..................................... a of 6 .�.. -... -_ �M un- f .... t`u-- f !lttil I= t 8 \�� I Saaz7S S7.fa��M 15aAi -0 u OU e a q ael jag to 3'1 ff- oo®o®® o ®®®® 9100000 00 0o0Q1a00 O � 3 idnosslw'AlNnoo3ioo',WONosug:13f z 0 133kl15 kfVAll08 llEl60E O 011 'S31183dOdd NOON VO w J 4 10190 INNOSSM 'A= NOSN33d3f 4 O; ) i Q T ALNtlJ�A 'N 0052 tY�f3 Z ONUSU s1VRI8.LYA - ONIA3ANf15 - 0NN133NION3 66 « .. J O U JNla�lfl8 4�SOdO�Id a S � •ouI 'saoieaag Ieuotssa;oad unossryq jea}ua� `" '" a a d � � � C.) 1 I� I I I I I I I I I I I x.............. e -- a �l 9 • d pppp -- .-.case-ti+s"�i1r— s z IN f$ e¢ n s�m JJEE�y pggx z s fill B 1111a . SIR N 6 4gggg��y g �y9 Its-i11 gsp�elg St1b 2�io 5 g88Y'.°i#a#g!-g6 wnossivV 1Nn003100'uIoNOsii3333r ,� j 133N1s t1VA1108 1060E o z N � Fri• 'E 1': �\ WR U s K99-rc9 (c sI 0ll 'S31i83d0Hd >1008aH0 a w s o d rows ranossIn •u�o Nosa3.s93r a sscc-�s9 fc,$) p m ou€ ONLL.SAl NaOH'3OOSZ mm m ommmns - ONJ33MI Mio-iie O7WdOc}itanoJ Ontss€ut}uao'saa[o C' a is h� N mg as. &5 e 20. Az � q3�g FEm mm� a m sa jb y w m f t 4 r!qll ; €t w �kalki eiF }f+}i! ftt` w w U Zn. a U. W .9 w It � 11 iis€i} IiP its 0i z dg �3 s O O O O O a w room o, t ` O 1 0- y � J w iD [O So 1 U gs Up pit J t: N ttl pF %��i ,5 ita$ LL9SR 6 iiuu _ 8 1 s t City of Jefferson Department of Planning & Protective Services 320 E. McCarty Street Jefferson City, MO 65101 Phone: 573-634-6410 1cplannlnarcDier,'cityrno.orcr www.jeffersoncitymo.gov APPLICATION FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) ❑ Concept PUD Plan ❑ Amendment to Final PUD Plan R Preliminary PUD Plan ❑ Amendment to Final PUD Plan for Signage ❑ Final PUD Plan PUD Project Name: Oakbrook Properties Street Address: W. Mr'C:art!Z StrPPt (600 block number not vet assigned) Legal Description: (as follows or is attached) Attached Please attach or include the following: a) Typed project narrative describing the type and character of the development, including land uses, acreage, proposed residential densities or commercial floor area (FAR); public or private open space, amenities or recreation areas to be provided; sidewalks and pedestrian ways; parking areas; deviations from minimum design standards of Section 35-51; and other information required by Section 35-74 or applicable sections of the Zoning Code. The project title and location must be included upon every page. Number all pages and attachments. b) Site Plan and/or Development Plan, as applicable. c) Preliminary or Final Subdivision Plat or Declaration of Condominium Association, as applicable; d) Draft of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions, as applicable; e) Traffic impact analysis, if required by Section 35-60; f) Signage Plan, including type, locations and dimensions of all proposed signs; g) Landscaping and Screening Plan; h) Lighting Plan, including pole heights, type of fixtures or luminaries, and foot candles; i) Project Phasing Plan (if applicable) j) Application Filing Fee = $500 + $200 advertising fee + $20 per acre + $250 rezoning fee (if applicable) (Revised July 1, 2018) Application Information: Property Owner: Oakb, Address 320 Nishod, Phone Number(s): 573—; Applicant Name (if different from owner): Address Phone Number(s): Consultant Name: Address: Phone Number(s): e attached ormation ac rately represents this proposed project Jeff W. Schaeperkoetter, Member 8/9/2020 fUoA4 Owner bignature I Printed Name/Title Date Consultant Signature Printed Name/Title Date For Staff Use Only. Application Filing Fee Received Amount Check # s Attachments: Narrative Site Plan ApplicantlProject Information Sheet 'Note other information submitted on back page Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request Page 1 of 7 City of Jefferson Department of Planning & Protective Services 320 E. McCarty Street Jefferson City, MO 65101 Phone: 573-634-6410 icnlan ninu(aDlefi`ci�vmo. oi•a www jeffersoncitymo.gov Project Information (Please use additional sheets if necessary) Name of Project Oakbrook Properties Location/Address W. McCarty Street 600 block number not yet assi ned Submitted by Oakbrook Properties, L.L.C. Applications Submitted (Check box and circle item) ® P&Z: Zonin! Amend Comp Plan Amend Special Exce tion UD Sub. Plat Annexation ❑ BOA: CUP Variance Appeal ❑ Staff: Site Plan Bldg Plans Grading Plan Change of Use Temp Use ❑ Other: Consultant(s) (List lead consultant and all others who are responsible for major project elements) Lead Consultant Name Firm Name Address Telephone Number Fax No. E-Mail Consultant Name Firm Name Address Telephone Number Fax No. E-Mail Consultant Name Firm Name Address Telephone Number Fax No. E-Mail Property Owners/Applicants (List owner; Mark "X" next to the name of the primary contact) Owner Name Oakbrook Properties, L.L.C. Address 320 Ni hodse Blf TRffRr_qnn CitV ml F;51 ni Telephone No. ., 573-301-7514 Fax No. E-Mail ljwschae@hotmail.com Applicant Name Oakbrook Properties, L.L.C. Address 320 Nishodse Blf, Jefferson City, MO 65101 Telephone No. 573-301-7514 Fax No. E-Mail ljwschae@hotmail.com Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request Page 2 of 7 EXHIBTI' A The following parcel of land, lying, being and situate in Cole County, Missouri: The northerly part of Inlot No. 424 in the City of Jefferson, Missouri, and particularly described as follows: Beginning on the westerly line of said Inlot 10 feet northerly of the southwesterly corner of said inlot, thence northerly with the westerly line of said inlot 188 feet 9 inches to the northwesterly corner thereof, thence easterly with the northerly line of said inlot 104 feet 4-1/2 inches to the northeasterly corner of said inlot, thence southerly along the easterly line of said inlot 138 feet 9 inches, thence in a westerly direction along and with the northerly line of the railroad land to the place of beginning. ATTACHMENT TO PRELIMINARY PUD APPLICATION Oakbrook Properties, L.L.C. Property at corner of Bolivar and McCarty Streets (0.40 acres) The Preliminary Plan for the Planned Unit Development District includes the following: (1) The scale and north point. Shown on survey. (2) Boundaries of the property to be developed. Shown on survey. (3) The names of the owners of the property and the individual or firm responsible for the preparation of the Preliminary Plan. Current Owner of the property and individual responsible for preparation of plan: Oakbrook Properties, L.L.C., 320 Nishodse Blf, Jefferson City, MO 65101; and Jeff W. Schaeperkoetter, Managing Member of Oakbrook Properties, L.L.C., with assistance from CMPS for topographic survey and Porter, Berendzen & Associates, P.C., Architects, for plat overlay (Site Study). (4) The existing zoning of the tract and the zoning of properties which are within 200 feet of the boundaries of the property. Current zoning of the property: PUD. The property to the north is also zoned PUD. The property immediately to the south and east is also zoned PUD. Across the railroad tracks to the southeast, across McCarty to the south and southwest, and across Bolivar to the west (and south of Wall Way) is zoned C-2. Across Bolivar to the west (and north of Wall Way) is zoned RA-2 and C-1. The State parking lot to the southeast on McCarty is zoned C-3 (5) The location, type and size of structures, on properties within 200 feet of the boundaries of the property. To the south across McCarty Street are commercial structures of varying sizes. To the west across Bolivar Street are a mix of structures with commercial and residential uses. To the north across Wall Way, a public way, is the large fire station for Jefferson City. (6) Acreage of the property to be included in the Planned District. The total area of the property is 17,060.4 square feet, for an acreage of slightly less than 0.40 acres. (7) Existing contours on an interval of not more than five feet and not less than two feet. The Owner has engaged CMPS to produce a topographic survey with existing contours on intervals of one (1) foot. A copy of that survey is provided with this application. (8) The location and direction of drainage of all water courses and a drainage plan with sufficient information to indicate the intent of the owner. This site drains toward the south and southwest (toward the railroad right-of-way at the southern boundary of the property) and the existing stormwater drainage is in the Bolivar Street right-of-way at the southwest corner of the property. At the south of the property, a "bioswale" area of sufficient size and capacity will be constructed to allow for drainage of the initial 1.37" rain event for the 17,000 square feet area to be treated. (9) The location of existing and proposed sanitary sewers. Existing sanitary sewers are shown on the topographic survey. Oakbrook Properties, L.L.C. PUD Application (600 Block of W. McCarty Street) (10) The proposed size, location, height, use and arrangement of all buildings except single family dwellings; the location and capacity of off-street parking areas, entrance and exit driveways and their relationship to existing and proposed streets; building lines; easements; common land and open space; and proposed streets, alleys and pedestrian ways. a Size, location and arrangement of buildings are shown on the plat overlay. The height of the buildings will not exceed that allowed by the City Code. o A driveway is currently located onto Bolivar Street near the intersection with McCarty Street. The driveway will be relocated to the north and farther away from the said intersection as shown on the plat overlay. A driveway at the rear of the building (to the northwest) will enter on to Wall Way as shown on the plat overlay. o Easements, streets, alleys and a pedestrian sidewalk are shown on the plat overlay. o Parking analysis (see separate Discussion attached): Coffee roastery-800 square feet (Mfg/production category) -Two employees- 2.2 spaces Office space-300 square feet-1 per 300 sq.ft. GFA-1 space Coffee shop (see below for proposal of parking requirement for this space)- 1,800 square feet plus 300 outdoor-9 spaces at 1 per 250 square feet. Short term rental-800 square feet-2 spaces (on -street parking permitted) Less "Old Town" allowance for on -street parking-5 spaces (based on frontage over 125 feet) In sum, 9.2 spaces off-street is required. In order to allow for the normal periods of higher customer traffic, an extra 5 spaces is considered adequate, for a total of 15 spaces as optimal. The attached site plan contains 19 spaces, and the plan will provide that those spaces will be larger than the minimum required by Ordinance. (11) Proposed landscaping and buffer zones. Shade trees will be provided as required (possible locations shown on the site study), and other landscaping on -site. No buffer zones are required. (12) Provide for the dedication of any right-of-way for the widening, extension or connection of major streets as shown in the Thoroughfare Plan. No dedication of any right-of-way is proposed as there are no impacts on street widths. (13) Establish the underlying zoning, mix of uses, density, layout, design and phasing of the proposed Planned Unit Development. Owner proposes a mix of uses which would include all uses permitted in C- 2 zones. No phasing of the Development is proposed. Other notes: 1. Off-street loading will comply with City Code. 2. Visual clear zones: Sight triangles are clear as shown on site study. 3. Setbacks: In view of the small size of the property, Owner requests that setback requirements be waived Oakbrook Properties, L.L.C. PUD Application (600 Block of W. McCarty Street) Other Notes (continued): 4. Signage: Signage will be compliant with the City's signage ordinance. The Owners anticipate a free-standing sign positioned along the South boundary of the property (shown on site study). 5. Lighting: Lighting for the Parking lot will be designed and placed in accordance with City requirements (proposed location shown on site study). 6. Fire Hydrants: Fire hydrants are currently located at the property and meet City requirements. Plan Approval: Commission Chairperson Date Director of Community Development Date Oakbrook Properties, L.L.C. PUD Application (600 Block of W. McCarty Street) (Vote: Discussion for coffee shop parking requirement. The Owner's Redevelopment Contract with the Housing Authority required 2,500 square feet of floor space. In consideration of subsequent social distancing and spacing requirements suggested by public health officials, and the impact on inside seating for coffee shop purposes, the Owner and its prospective tenant have opted to increase the floor space of the coffee shop from 1,400 to 1,800 square feet. The larger size will seek to accommodate the expected customer usage with greater spacing between tables and seating areas. The City Code provides categories for parking requirement such as bar/tavern, smoking lounge and restaurant (all at 1 parking space for 100 square feet of gross floor area), general retail (1 per 250), and low volume retail (1 per 500). The Code also provides: "The Director shall determine the parking requirement for uses which do not correspond to the categories listed in Exhibit 35-58A. In such instances, the applicant shall provide adequate information by which the proposal can be reviewed." The Owner proposes that the general retail category be applied, or, in the alternative, that the Director determine that the coffee shop use does not correspond to the categories listed in the Code, and that 1 parking space per 250 square feet be required. The following information is provided to support the alternative requests: Type of uses: Coffee shop for consumption of coffee, other drink and limited food items, retail sales of bag coffee and other items, area for preparation of items available for consumption on -site, with amenities on -site such as restrooms and areas for viewing. Number of employees: Two service employees at higher volume times. Building design capacity: To be determined. Square feet of sales area, service area, etc.: Seating (800), Sales/ordering (300), handicapped accessible restrooms (200), kitchen/preparation (500). Parking spaces proposed on -site: 17 per site study, but may have to be adjusted depending on set- back, loading zones and other contingencies. Parking spaces provided elsewhere: 5 on -street parking spaces. State parking lot within 200 feet. Hours of operation: Generally, 6 a.m. to 5 p.m. daily (currently not open Sunday), may be expanded. i I _ , a: vi r , ' d ff a W a a s 0 N m w A In U Three Story Coffee Summary of timeline and correspondence Page Preliminary PUD Plan — submittal, staff review, P&Z Review, City Council approval. 1-2 July 13 —30, 2020 Email chain re: PUD site plan pre -submittal 3-5 August 4, 2020 Pre -development meeting with property owner. (see attached staff notes and visuals from meeting) 6 August 10, 2020 Email re: application submittal and pre -submittal fire department discussions 7-11 September 4-13, 2020 Email chain re: staff comments on PUD Plan in advance of P&Z meeting, including reference to Fire department comments, and response by owner. 12 September 14, 2020 Email with revised site PUD plan. September 16, 2020 P&Z Commission Meeting. Recommendation for approval of Preliminary PUD Plan. 13-17 October 16-22, 2020 Email chain between applicant and Law Department re: incorporation of alley parking and use restrictions into PUD Council Bill. October 19, 2020 Approval of Preliminary PUD Plan by City Council, via substitute bill incorporating alley parking and use restrictions. Page Final PUD Plan — submittal, staff review, staff approval April 5, 2021 Submittal of Final PUD Plan by Central Missouri Professional Services. The plan showed installation of head in parking off of alley. 18 April 8, 2021 Correspondence from CMPS to Planning Division RE: telephone discussion and FD/Owner Coordination April 9, 2021 Internal city staff meeting (Fire Dept, Law Dept, Planning Dept) regarding Final PUD Plan submittal. 19 April 9, 2021 Correspondence from CMPS to Planning Division RE: revised site plan sheet. April 9, 2021 Submittal of revised Final PUD Plan by CMPS 20-21 May 6, 2021 Staff comments to CMPS regarding Final PUD Plan. June 21, 2021 Revised Final PUD Plan submitted by CMPS July 9, 2021 Approval of Final PUD Plan by staff. Page Tract Division of Neighboring Railroad Property — submittal, staff review, staff approval 22 June 23-24, 2021 Email chain re: Tract division (Union Pacific property) review status. 23-25 July 15, 2021 Email chain re: Tract division comments by staff. September, 2021 Submittal of signed document, approval, and recording of tract division Page Rear Parking Area — correspondence and meetings between staff and owner 26-27 May 16-18, 2022 Email chain re: parking lot installation (not according to plan) and response by owner 28-29 May 25-June 5, 2022 Email chain re: Meeting between owner and Fire Department regarding parking. May 31, 2022 Meeting held between owner and Fire Department. 30 June 3, 2022 Email to Planning division re: meeting between owner and fire department and sign permit question. 31-33 June 5, 2022 Email chain re: meeting between owner and fire department and fire department response. 34-35 June 27, 2022 Planning Staff inquiry on owners plans and response. 36-37 June 28, 2022 Email re: Temporary Certificate of Occupancy issuance Temporary CO attached, issued with conditions on bringing the parking into conformance Page Amended PUD Plan — application submittal. P&Z review, City Council decision 38-39 July 7-11, 2022 Email chain re: Request PUD amendment be deemed a "minor amendment", and response by Planning Division Staff. August 11, 2022 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. Recommendation for approval subject to conditions. 40-41 August 24-29, 2022 Email chain re: Staff recommendation to City Council post P&Z meeting. September 6/19 Introduction / Public hearing at City Council. Bill failed on a 5/5 vote. -----Original Message ----- From: Jeff <jwschae@hotmail.com> Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2020 2:09 PM To: Zollinger, Ian <IZollinger@jeffcitymo.org> Cc: Wade, Shane <SWade@jeffcitymo.org>; Barron, Eric <EBarron@jeffcitymo.org>; Vande Voorde, Dan <DVandeVoorde@jeffcitymo.org>; Nanoski, Ahnna <ANanos ki@jeffcitymo.org> Subject: Re: PUD Information Tuesday will work for me. Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 30, 2020, at 1:52 PM, Zollinger, Ian <IZollinger@jeffcitymo.org> wrote: > Jeff, > Tuesday would work better with City Staff and the availability of appropriately sized rooms. Please let me know if that does not work. I will send this around to those who review plans and we will have some preliminary comments prepared for you at that time. > From: Jeff [mailto:jwschae@hotmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2020 1:21 PM > To: Zollinger, Ian > Cc: Tony Anderson; Scott > Subject: Re: PUD Information > Ian: I am attaching a draft of the narrative that will accompany the actual PUD application, which I have printed off from the City's website, and hope to be able to submit to you by the August 10 deadline for consideration by the P & > I am also going to forward to you the site study prepared by the Berendzen firm, which shows an overlay of the topo survey prepared by CMPS and the proposed location and size of the building and parking areas. I also have the oversized version of the survey itself, which I will provide with the application. If you need to see it in advance, please let me know. > I would like to have the opportunity to visit with you about this and discuss its contents and any thoughts you may have. Monday would be good for me, about anytime. Please let me know what would work for you. > Jeff Schaeperkoetter > Oakbrook Properties, L.L.C. > [X] > From: Zollinger, Ian > <IZollinger@jeffcitymo.org<maiIto: IZoIli nger@jeffcitymo.org>> > Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020 3:57 PM > To: jwschae@hotmail.com<mailto:jwschae@hotmail.com> > <jwschae@hotmail.com<mailto:jwschae@hotmail.com>> > Subject: PUD Information Coorespondence/Timeline Packet Page 1 > The site plan should show the property boundaries, it should show the location of the building in relation to the property lines and other buildings if there are any. Parking stalls and widths of driveways. The plan should be to scale. > If you have any more questions please let me know and like I said we can meet to go over what you have. I am confident that we can get you to a place where we can bring it to the Planning and Zoning Commission. > Ian Zollinger > Planner > Department of Planning & Protective Services City of Jefferson > 320 E. McCarty St. > Jefferson City, MO 65101 > Direct Phone - 573-634-6313 > Fax - 573-634-6457 > <meeting.ics> Coorespondence/Timeline Packet Page 2 a ll� //Cmwp ,:Z:-cj,, 4� >%ft �r A� /lam W— c —�" Z, e- Coorespondence/Timeline Packet Page 3 Packet Page 4 u I to a LL ----- ------- tL .—_ O o- m m� 0 n ine Packet Page 5 From: Jeff <jwschae@hotmail.com> Sent: Monday, August 10, 2020 8:13 AM To: Zollinger, Ian <IZollinger@jeffcitymo.org> Cc: Barron, Eric <EBarron@jeffcitymo.org>; Sarah Anderson <threestoryoffice@gmail.com>; Tony Anderson <threestorycoffee@gmail.com> Subject: PUD Application Ian: I will be bringing in the application package first thing this morning. Please let me know if there are concerns that I need to deal with. There are some minor revisions in the drawings to that back parking area and the driveway onto Bolivar (and trees. lights and signs), and I did share the revised drawing with Chief Turner because of the fire department's concerns that he expressed. I also made some slight revisions to other areas of the attachment, including putting an "optimum" number of parking spaces outside of any mathematical calculation. Thank you for the meeting the other day. Jeff Coorespondence/Timeline Packet Page 6 From: Jeff <jwschae@hotmail.com> Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2020 9:43 PM To: Wade, Shane <SWade@jeffcitymo.org> Cc: Barron, Eric <EBarron@jeffcitymo.org>; Zollinger, Ian <IZollinger@jeffcitymo.org>; Nanoski, Ahnna <ANanoski@jeffcitymo.org>; Bange, David <DBange@jeffcitymo.org>; Fontana, Don <DFontana@jeffcitymo.org>; Bonnot, Len <LBonnot@jeffcitymo.org>; Turner, Jason <JTu rner@ jeffcitymo.org> Subject: Re: Coffee Shop B n B Prelim PUD, Bolivar Street @ West McCarty Street, Engineering Division P & Z Review Comments Mark-up, 1st Review Shane: I hope to be getting to you and the others, before noon today, new pdfs. I was able to get the pdfs enlarged and changed to show (1) some of the notes in the margin as requested in your mark-up, (2) labeling changes to the "Site Study" as you requested, along with the approval signature and date area, which I omitted from the original application, and (3) the dimensions of the building and parking spaces and lanes in a more readable fashion. I also delivered to your office on Friday the full-size survey by CMPS which shows utility locations and survey detail. I would like to incorporate the Commission's "Location Map" into the application to reflect the zoning of the adjacent parcels, which was noted in a narrative fashion in the application. That map also shows the nature of the adjoining buildings in a better fashion than I could do (other than in the narrative notes), but I would be happy to supplement the application with photographs that I could -e-mail to you as early as Tuesday morning, if you or other staff feel that the Commission members may need to see those photographs. I would note that a couple of the mark-up notes were not addressed further than the commentary and notes provided in narrative fashion with my application. For instance, there is no driveway currently considered at the east side of the proposed building. Of course, if that changes, appropriate steps will be taken to protect the building with bollards or the like. As to drainage, the bioswale will require engineering/landscape architect work, but my research indicates that there is ample space to provide a bioswale area that will meet the City's requirements. I did not undertake to show the visual clear zones, and do not see an issue there, and the final plan can depict those with more accuracy. I will have the new pdfs in shape to send to you and the others on this chain before noon tomorrow, but I wanted you and the others to have this e-mail first thing in the morning, so am sending this without the new pdfs now. Please call me at 573-301-7514 if you or any of the others have any questions. Jeff From: Jeff <iwschae@hotmail.com> Sent: Friday, September 11, 2020 9:48 AM Coorespondence/Timeline Packet Page 7 To: Wade, Shane <SWade@ieffcitymo.org> Cc: Barron, Eric <EBarron@ieffcitymo.org>; Zollinger, Ian <IZollinger@ieffcitymo.org>; Nanoski, Ahnna <ANanoski@leffcitymo.org>; Bange, David <DBange@leffcitymo.org>; Fontana, Don <DFontana@ieffcitymo.org>; Bonnot, Len <LBonnot@ieffcitymo.org>; Turner, Jason <JTurner@leffcitymo.org> Subject: Re: Coffee Shop B n B Prelim PUD, Bolivar Street @ West McCarty Street, Engineering Division P & Z Review Comments Mark-up, 1st Review Shane: Thanks for your e-mail. Sorry I did not get it until you re -sent it yesterday, as it went to my junk mail and I was notable to access that from my phone which seems weird tome! I have contacted PBA Architects this morning about doing slightly larger versions without the pixillation issues and adding some information. I may be hearing something back from them as early as today. I do have a large version of the original survey that I will drop off at your office this morning. That should be helpful on the legibility and the topographical lines. I did note that CMPS did the "topo" on one -foot intervals, which is not, of course, and unfortunately, "not less than two" as required by the Plan ordinance. That was done because, as you might expect, the grading of the lot will be a critical feature of our building and parking plans there. I have talked with the fire department about the parking adjacent to the alley. There will need to be a retaining wall and the parking will be lower than alley level, and we will follow all survey lines in the completion of the project, and we will make every reasonable effort to reduce the impact on the fire department's operational requirements. We will be good neighbors. I am planning on showing some of the details like the drainage on the final plan, and avoiding existing infrastructure will obviously be engineered and planned. The visual clear zone at the driveways, while I think clearly not an issue with the placement of the building, could also be shown then. My understanding is that I cannot commence construction until the Final Plan is filed, and things like bollards, retaining walls, sewer connections and the like may be more clearly plannable with the building design done. In addition, we have not yet identified the size and type of structure for the signage, and I have thought that a separate permit was required for that, and the PUD application only needed to show sign location(s). Just for my own clarification, the "Location Map" that accompanied the city's notices depicts the adjacent zoning and the type and size of the adjacent structures. Will you need more information than that? I could provide pictures of the structures in that area as an addendum. As you mentioned, I provided some of the information in the written commentary. I noticed on some of the previous PUD submissions by other developers that those were simply in narrative form on the survey plan itself. Thank you again for your contact. I will be as diligent as I can to get you the information quickly. We obviously want the City's staff to be able recommend approval to the Commission, and will do our best to enable that to happen. Please understand as we move forward that my wife and I are trying to avoid unnecessary expense at this stage of the re -development. We take that approach because we realize that either the P & Z Commission or City Council could delay or derail our redevelopment. Be assured that we will undertake any reasonable expense after preliminary plan approval to complete the redevelopment project and protect our investment in the real estate itself. Jeff Coorespondence/Timeline Packet Page 8 From: Wade, Shane <SWade@ieffcitymo.org> Sent: Friday, September 4, 2020 10:19 AM To:'jwschae@hotmail.com' <iwschae@hotmail.com> Cc: Barron, Eric <EBarron@ieffcitymo.org>; Zollinger, Ian <IZollinger@ieffcitymo.org>; Nanoski, Ahnna <ANanoski@ieffcitymo.org>; Bange, David <DBange@ieffcitymo.org>; Fontana, Don <DFontana@ieffcitymo.org>; Bonnot, Len <LBonnot@ieffcitymo.org>; Turner, Jason <JTu rner@ ieffcitymo.org> Subject: Coffee Shop B n B Prelim PUD, Bolivar Street @ West McCarty Street, Engineering Division P & Z Review Comments Mark-up, 1st Review Jeff - Please find attached our review comments mark-up regarding the preliminary PUD for the Coffee Shop/ B & B at the corner of Bolivar Street and West McCarty Street. It is really hard to read any important information regarding the topo/ survey in the background from this plan. It contains a lot of the information (utilities, sewer, curb/ sidewalk etc.) that we look over. I don't know if it was shaded too much, or the scan pixel size makes it difficult to read, either way we need a better plan. Full size plans for the resubmittal would be very helpful once the pixilation/ shading issue is resolved. With the comments attached, I have tried to reference the number of the specific comment in the checklist that it refers back to. Some of the information is contained in the narrative of the application, but needs to really be information contained on the preliminary PUD plan as well. The Fire Department is requesting some type of physical barrier/ i.e. curbing, island, bollards, landscaping and/ or combination thereof for the parking next to the alleyway. This will need to occur on the property, not the alleyway. We want to ensure that encroachment of parking does not interfere with the alley property in any way. Please refer to the attached mark-up for more specific location/ information. We will need to prepare our Staff Reports for the meeting next week, so if we could have a resubmittal of the revised drawing(s) as soon as possible next week, it would be beneficial. Our goal would be to write our staff reports without having to address the comments contained within this review comments mark-up for the site plan in order to recommend approval of the plan. I believe most of the comments should be straight forward, but let me know if you need any clarification (s). Thanks. Shane Wade Shane Wade, P.E. Plan Review and Development Engineer City of Jefferson Dept. of Public Works Engineering Division 573.634.6449 0 573.634.6457 F swade@ieffcitvmo.org Coorespondencerrimeline Packet Page 9 l��� a r /\vA_, li✓e S 1� /YI c �a• .�t�zef I rc l----- 4 t) a •Y Co 65�re �Z OP 5 I3131 �Z a approval. A Concept Plan application and submittal shall be reviewed based on criteria established in Section 35-27 as well as the criteria for zoning changes, Section 35-74.B.4, and the criteria for a Preliminary Plan in Section 35-74.C.3. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall approve, conditionally approve or deny approval of all applications for a Concept Plan. PUD Preliminary Plan. a. A PUD Preliminary Plan constitutes a major step in the review process. A rezoning application shall be submitted with the PUD Preliminary Plan application. The accepted "design" density indicated in the Concept Plan approval cannot be presumed as a matter perimeter rights -of -way shall be dedicated at the time the Preliminary Plan is approved right from the PUD zoning designation, but shall be justified at the preliminary stage through site and structure design. The Council may limit the density on all or any portion of a PUD if it determines that the design fails to fulfil the purposes of this Ordinance and Section- b. Application requirements and processing procedures shall comply with those described in Section 35-70 and Section 35-71, with the following modifications: (f) If the PUD Preliminary Plan proposes multiple phases, specific densities shall be assigned to each phase. Density at each preliminary phase shall be justified by specific design. Density from one phase may be shifted to another phase subject to Council approval. The Council, in approving the PUD Preliminary Plan, may conduct the first reading o` the rezoning ordinance for the area described in the PUD Preliminary Plan. (2) If a PUD Preliminary Plan is approved, the applicant shall submit a Final PUD Plan and Subdivision Plat application in accordance with the approved development schedule. (3) The City may require that a homeowners association or corporation be created to maintain and administer the project's lands or facilities. Articles of Incorporation and Restrictive Covenants shall be recorded at, or prior to, the recording of the Final PUD Plan and Plat. The Homeowners Association shall be required to maintain all common space in reasonable order and condition on a timely, consistent basis- C. The Preliminary Plan for the Planned Unit Development District shall show. ! � The scale and north point. fit, TVpvL 4:=1+� Boundaries of the property to be developed.— Prs"'dG pjw., ~' ° Su rY� '( The names of the owners of the property and the individual or firm responsible for the< - preparation of the Preliminary Plan. ® The existing zoning of the tract and the zoning of properties which are within 200 feet of the boundaries of the property. -- Prn v • dt 0,4 P /AH (mil, The location, type and size of structures, on properties within 200 feet of the boundaries of the property. — Mmoo . da o n P 4% n . Acreage of the property to be included in the Planned District. �" Existing contours on an interval of not more than five feet and not less than two feet. 5e41 t,8 The location and direction of drainage of all water courses and a drainage plan with y3p fwS sufficient information to indicate the intent of the owner. Gin P /s-►� 9� The location of existing and proposed sanitary sewers. rr.wr�C - pP t1rJ) The proposed size, location, height, use and arrangement of all buildings except singte- familyamily dwellings; the location and capacity of off-street parking areas, entrance and exit driveways and their relationship to existing and proposed streets; building lines; easements; common land and open space; and proposed streets, alleys and pedestrian ways. —j4-4 Proposed landscaping and buffer zones, 5eC. irolt-F a" fit"^ rtiRr�- vP h/ct ( Provide for the dedication of any right-of-way for the vridening, extension or connection of major streets as shown in the Thoroughfare Plan. (i 3 Date and signature lines for execution by the Commission Chairman and theppirector of Community Development to show the date of Plan approval. -- P, o ~ 1c o.. Pto, d. A PUD Preliminary Plan shall: (1) Comply with the criteria established in Section 35.27, as well as the criteria for rezoning, Section 35-74.6.4 and Preliminary Plat approval in the Subdivision Code. (2) Comply with the approved Concept Plan, if applicable; and (3) Establish the underlying zoning, mix of uses, density, layout, design and phasing of the proposed Planned Unit Development. e. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the application at a public hearing in conformance with Section 35-70 and shall make recommendations to the Council, The Council Page 4 of 7 Coorespondence/Timeline Packet Page 10 IC*K, Al( (yam Coorespondence/Timeline Packet Page 11 From: Jeff <jwschae@hotmail.com> Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 10:22 AM To: Wade, Shane <SWade@jeffcitymo.org> Cc: Zollinger, Ian <IZollinger@jeffcitymo.org>; Barron, Eric <EBarron@jeffcitymo.org>; Nanoski, Ahnna <ANanoski@jeffcitymo.org> Subject: Fwd: Three Story Coffee - Site Plan & Floor Plan Shane: The amended PDFs are attached. I am away from my computer and on my phone and only could cc Eric, Ian and Ahnna from my phone. Could you forward to the others on your end? And confirm receipt? If you print these on 11 x 17, they are more legible, although the scale changes on one of them, I think. I do have them printed already, but won't be back in JC until tomorrow to drop them off with Ellen. I will get you an 11 x 17 of each in the morning. Please let me know if the attachments do not come through or if anyone has questions. My number is +15733017514. Jeff Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: "Scott Schaeperkoetter" <Scott@signaturehomesic.com> To: "Jeff Schaeperkoetter11 <iwschae@hotmail.com> Subject: Three Story Coffee - Site Plan & Floor Plan - with logo Scott Schaeperkoetter Signature Homes Inc. - Owner Scott@signaturehomesic.com (573) 690-4377 - Cell (573) 761-3898 — Fax aa�axw� reorrvrxt uc i i it 1� 11."IN,; ♦ 1 1,"Y e l l.ltxat�a a.11. Vlfa�l .t. �. �•••— " Coorespondence/Timeline Packet Page 12 From: Jeff <jwschae@hotmail.com> Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2020 10:59 AM To: Moehlman, Ryan <RMoehlman@jeffcitymo.org> Cc: Barron, Eric <EBarron@jeffcitymo.org>; Schofield, Matt <MSchofield@jeffcitymo.org>; Turner, Jason <JTurner@jeffcitymo.org>; Graham, Carlos <CGraham@jeffcitymo.org> Subject: Re: Bolivar & McCarty PUD Thank you, Ryan, and the whole group for helping to get this to the finish line before the Council on Monday evening. Jeff From: Moehlman, Ryan <RMoehlman@ieffcitymo.org> Sent: Monday, October 19, 2020 3:31 PM To: 'Jeff' <iwschae@hotmail.com> Cc: Barron, Eric <EBarron@ieffcitymo.org>; Schofield, Matt <MSchofield@ieffcitymo.org>; Turner, Jason <JTurner@ieffcitymo.org>; Graham, Carlos <CGraham@ieffcitymo.org> Subject: RE: Bolivar & McCarty PUD Sounds good. I'll draw it up. Ryan .\. Lloehlman. Cit, Attorne_% City of .letlerson. Mis ouri (573) 634-631-' RMoehlman c leffcitvmo.ore From: Jeff [mailto:jwschae(a)hotmail.coml Sent: Monday, October 19, 2020 10:40 AM To: Moehlman, Ryan Cc: Barron, Eric; Schofield, Matt; Turner, Jason; Graham, Carlos Subject: Re: Bolivar & McCarty PUD Ryan: I am okay with removing the new language about the alley if # 3 in the second list is removed and the rest renumbered. Jeff Sent from my Whone On Oct 19, 2020, at 8:26 AM, Moehlman, Ryan <RMoehhnangieffcitymo.org> wrote: Mr Schaeperkoetter: This language is acceptable to me, except for the first long addition in red. I do not know the history of the alley, but if part of the pavement has been on the property long enough, then that pavement may have become part of the public right of way by prescriptive use. If the remainder of the language is sufficient for you, then I will draft a bill amendment. If this needs further discussion, then I suggest that the bill sponsor should place the bill on the informal calendar until the November meeting so we have more time to discuss. I will run this by planning and fire staff and the bill sponsor. Coorespondence/Timeline Packet Page 13 Thank you. -Ryan Sent from my Sprint Samsun* Galaxy S 10. -------- Original message -------- From: Jeff <jwschae�hotmail.com> Date: 10/18/20 9:15 PM (GMT-06:00) To: "Moehlman, Ryan" <RMoehlman car jeffcit mo.org> Cc: "Barron, Eric" <EBarron_ac'e� ffcitymo.ory>, "Schofield, Matt" <MSchofieldajeffcitymo•org>, "Turner, Jason" <JTurner a,ieffcitymo.org>, "Graham, Carlos" <CGraham(a,ieffcit�.org> Subject: Re: Bolivar & McCarty PUD Ryan: In the absence of a response to my Friday evening e-mail, I thought I should get this to you before the weekend was over. Your proposed language leaves way too many questions unanswered, which I set forth in the preceding e-mail, so I undertook to resolve those issues with the following. Your altered language is in black, my new language is in red. The public alleyway known as "W. Wall Way" (the "alleyway") shall be designated as "no parking" from the intersection of the alleyway and Bolivar St. to the eastern property line of the subject property. The alleyway is currently, and has been, at all times previous since its dedication as a public way in the City of Jefferson, available for the unfettered use of the general public, as well as the owners of property on both sides of the alleyway, subject only to the traffic code of the City of Jefferson. The paved portion of the alleyway may currently encroach upon the subject property. To the extent that a mutually agreed -upon survey of the subject property's north property line reveals such an encroachment, the City will remove such pavement and relocate the paving within the alleyway or allow the developer to remove the pavement. The alleyway shall not be used in the operations of any commercial or residential use on the subject property in that no owner or occupant of the subject property shall suggest, encourage, or, with knowledge, allow or permit vendors, customers, tenants, or invitees to park, idle, or block the alleyway at any time. Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed (1) to prohibit the use of the alleyway for general vehicular or pedestrian access to the parking lot on the subject property which is directly adjacent to the alleyway; (2) to prohibit ingress and egress along any point of the alleyway adjacent to the subject property; (3) to prohibit the unfettered use of the alleyway by the City of Jefferson, as long as it remains a public way; (4) to prohibit the owner or occupant from trash service pickup along the alleyway; or (5) to criminalize or otherwise force any vehicular user to not comply with any traffic regulations of the City of Jefferson, such as stopping at stop signs or yielding to pedestrians. Neither shall this provision require the owner or occupant of the subject property to enforce the parking, idling, or blocking restriction in any way other than making a reasonable effort to obtain voluntary compliance and, if unsuccessful, reporting the suspected violation to the City of Jefferson for either police or towing action. We will be on the road first thing in the morning to come home and will have time in the morning to take a call on the road or to come in and discuss this in the afternoon. Perhaps Chief Schofield or Chief Turner could meet with us as well. Jeff Coorespondence/Timeline Packet Page 14 From: Jeff <iwschae@hotmail.com> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2020 8:06 PM To: Moehlman, Ryan <RMoehlman@ieffcitymo.org> Cc: Barron, Eric <EBarron@ieffcitymo.org>; Schofield, Matt <MSchofield@ieffcitymo.org>; Turner, Jason <JTurner@ieffcitymo.org>; Graham, Carlos <CGraham@ieffcitymo.org> Subject: Re: Bolivar & McCarty PUD Ryan: Thanks for the modifications. The "allow or permit" language is a bit of a trap. What is the "affirmative requirement on the business?" if the no parking sign is not sufficient to keep people from parking there, will we need to put up a sign that says, "Please obey the no parking signs" or, if there is a violator, prove that it was not a vendor, customer, tenant or invitee of the business? I totally get the fire department's need to keep its access unfettered. However, it remains a public way of the city, over which we have no control. Will we be expected to enforce the no parking sign? Is the city considering additional signage, such as "No Through Street", to discourage the random access to the alley? Or, perhaps, "Violators will be towed at own expense." Maybe rather than "allow or permit", the phrase "suggest or encourage" would more accurately describe our obligation. Or, "with knowledge of the blocking, allow or permit." Maybe I am making a mountain out of a molehill. But if the burden and penalty for illegal parking on a public way falls on the owner, the owner's responsibility needs to be clearly set forth. And the City must meet its burden of adequate signage, active enforcement and response to complaints, and adequate width of the alley itself. Otherwise, the penalty or punishment (presumably not "essentially small fines") is left totally to the city. Revocation of a business license? Public censure? I still believe that the phrase "in that no owner or occupant of the subject property shall allow or permit vendors, customers, tenants, or invitees to park, idle, or block the alleyway at any time" should be omitted in its entirety from the proposed substitute. To fail to do so exposes the development to an unreasonable risk of violation. The remaining language adequately requires us to constrain our operations to the limits of our property, which we' are and will be committed to. Coincidentally, your current proposed language would apply to trash service by its very terms, notwithstanding the elimination of the previous trash service limitation. Jeff From: Moehlman, Ryan <RMoehlman@ieffcitymo.org> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2020 4:48 PM To: 'Jeff' <iwschae@hotmail.com> Cc: Barron, Eric <EBarron@ieffcitymo.org>; Schofield, Matt <MSchofield@ieffcitymo.org>; Turner, Jason <1Turner@ieffcitymo.org>; Graham, Carlos <CGraham@ieffcitymo.org> Subject: RE: Bolivar & McCarty PUD I appreciate your comments and have narrowed some of the language accordingly. I must keep some language imposing an affirmative requirement on the business to help keep customers, vendors, etc from parking in the alley. The fire department believes that this is important enough that the punishments of the parking code (essentially small fines) are not enough to effectively prevent the behavior that needs to be avoided. Coorespondence/Timeline Packet Page 15 I have verified the location of Station 1's dumpster and removed the restriction on trash service. The amended language is as follows: The public alleyway known as "W. Wall Way" (the "alleyway") shall be designated as "no parking" from the intersection of the alleyway and Bolivar St. to the eastern property line of the subject property. The alleyway shall not be used in the operations of any commercial or residential use on the subject property in that no owner or occupant of the subject property shall allow or permit vendors, customers, tenants, or invitees to park, idle, or block the alleyway at any time. Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to prohibit the use of the alleyway for general vehicular or pedestrian access to the parking lot on the subject property which is directly adjacent to the alleyway. Thanks Rear, A. Al��chlnr,i�_ C�i_�, At1��rn�� Cite i�(I It�i:xni. ;Ali„nnri !�73)01-(.i11 RMoehlmanCajeffcitvmo.ore From: Jeff [mailto:jwschae@hotmail.coml Sent: Friday, October 16, 2020 4:01 PM To: Moehlman, Ryan Cc: Barron, Eric; Schofield, Matt; Turner, Jason; Graham, Carlos Subject: Re: Bolivar & McCarty PUD Ryan: Thanks for your note. As you know, I am out of state and in a location where wi-fi access is sketchy. I will return Monday in time for the council meeting, but the late arrival of this issue may limit my ability to respond. My ability to talk with others by phone is very limited. This issue, though, was the subject of a meeting I had with Chief Turner prior to the P & Z meeting. I assured Chief Turner that we would take all possible steps to ensure the accessibility of the alleyway. We reduced the size of the back parking area specifically because we thought Chief Turner's expressed concerns were appropriate from the fire department's perspective. And, while I have no problems with the intent of this suggested language, it may go further that is required. For instance, I have noted that the fire station's trash container is located down this same alley. I assume without really knowing that the trash container is accessed by the trash company down that alley. If that is the case, presumably the trash company would make both pickups on the same trip. Would the fire department consider allowing our location to use its currently -existing trash containers or locate our trash container next to yours? If not, the language would require us to locate the trash containers at the front of the building, which is neither aesthetically nor olfactorily desirable. We do not intend to use the alley for operational purposes. I should note, however, that the surveyed property line indicates that about 4 of the alley's current paved surface actually encroaches on our property. That part of the surface will need to be removed for placement of the retaining wall along that boundary line. The "or other obstruction" seems a little vague to my lawyerly mind. Frankly, the provisions of the City Code in Art. 1, Section 22, seem to adequately control the parking on a public way. If the only purpose of the new language is to make the developer and the located business subject to penalty or required for enforcement, then I would propose the following alternative language, which shows your original proposed language, with lined - through portions: Coorespondence/Timeline Packet Page 16 No ll r idling, bleeking, " "alleyway") may. The alleyway shall not be used in the operations of any commercial or residential use on the subject property, E neluding that ne 9wReF E)F eeeupant efthe subjeet PFGpeFty shall allow or peRnit veRdeFs, eusterriers, teRants, er invitees te -,.I. r idle, hleek r ., eth.,Fwir„ tebstri.ir-t thy, alleyway at y time Solid Waste „iek r s fee the subj et „ eFty shall net „eFFnitted t„ use the „„hlie alleyway t„ provide such seFviG Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to prohibit the use of the alleyway for general vehicular or pedestrian access to the parking lot located on the ReFtheast (northwest) side of the subject property. Let me know your thoughts. Jeff From: Moehlman, Ryan <RMoehlman@ieffcitymo.org> Sent: Friday, October 16, 2020 11:33 AM To: 'Jeff' <iwschae@hotmail.com> Cc: Barron, Eric <EBarron@ieffcitymo.org>; Schofield, Matt <MSchofield@ieffcitymo.org>; Turner, Jason <JTurner@ieffcitymo.org>; Graham, Carlos <CGraham@ieffcitymo.org> Subject: Bolivar & McCarty PUD Mr. Schaeperkoetter: Myself and Planning Staff have been in discussions with the Fire Department on how to mitigate potential negative impacts on emergency operations at Fire Station 1. We have come up with a solution of affirmatively marking the W. Wall Way alley as no parking and including the following operation guideline in the ordinance approving the PUD plan. Essentially it prohibits the business and apartment on the property from using the alley as part of its operations (i.e., vendor deliveries, customers idling in the alley to pop in and grab a quick cup of coffee, trash service, etc.) so the alley will be kept clear 24/7 for emergency vehicles. We have little doubt that you and your family would be great neighbors to the Fire Station and 100% helpful in making sure important emergency services are not impacted, but we must make sure that any future owners/occupants would be equally as helpful. The paragraph we would add to do so reads as follows: No parking, idling, blocking, or other obstruction shall be allowed at any time in the public alleyway known as "W. Wall Way" (the "alleyway") from the intersection of the alleyway and Bolivar St. to the eastern property line of the subject property. The alleyway shall not be used in the operations of any commercial or residential use on the subject property, including that no owner or occupant of the subject property shall allow or permit vendors, customers, tenants, or invitees to park, idle, block, or otherwise obstruct the alleyway at any time. Solid Waste pick up services for the subject property shall not permitted to use the public alleyway to provide such services. Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to prohibit the use of the alleyway for general vehicular or pedestrian access to the parking lot located on the northeast side of the subject property. It is staff's intent to offer this language as part of a substitute bill on Monday night. Please let us know if you have any questions on this matter. Thank you. -Ryan RN an A. Moehlman Cite Attorne, City of.lefferson. Missouri Off -ice: (573) 634-6314 RMoehlman 0aJeffcitvmo.ore This communication may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If it has been sent to you in error. please contact the sender for instructions concernimc, return or destruction. and do not use or disclose the contents to others. Coorespondence/Timeline Packet Page 17 From: Paul Samson <psamson@cmps-inc.com> Sent: Thursday, April 8, 2021 9:50 AM To: Barron, Eric <EBarron@jeffcitymo.org> Subject: RE: PUD Plan - 311 Bolivar Street Eric, Thanks for the call this morning. I talked to Jeff and we are going to send Jason a plan and meet with them to get any issues worked out. Hopefully we will have a resolution by the end of next week. Paul Samson, PE Central Missouri Professional Services, Inc. 2500 E. McCarty St. Jefferson City, MO 65101 Phone: 573-634-3455 Fax: 573-634-8898 psamson@cmps-inc.com From: Barron, Eric <EBarron@ieffcitymo.org Sent: Thursday, April 8, 20218:27 AM To: Paul Samson <psamson@cmps-inc.com> Subject: PUD Plan - 311 Bolivar Street Eric Barron Planning Manager City of Jefferson (573) 634-6419 Coorespondence/Timeline Packet Page 18 From: Paul Samson <psamson@cmps-inc.com> Sent: Friday, April 9, 20212:29 PM To: Barron, Eric <EBarron@jeffcitymo.org> Subject: Bolivar St. Site Plan Eric, I spoke with Jeff and he is good with the changes we discussed. I will send down revised drawings for Sheet C100 on Monday. Paul Samson, PE Central Missouri Professional Services, Inc. 2500 E. McCarty St. Jefferson City, MO 65101 Phone: 573-634-3455 Fax: 573-634-8898 psamson@cmps-inc.com Coorespondencerrimeline Packet Page 19 From: Barron, Eric Sent: Thursday, May 6, 2021 9:07 AM To: Wade, Shane <SWade@jeffcitymo.org>;'psamson@cmps-inc.com' <psamson@cmps-inc.com> Cc: Kreyling, Matt <MKreyling@jeffcitymo.org>; Bange, David <DBange@jeffcitymo.org>; Fontana, Don <DFontana@jeffcitymo.org>; Bonnot, Len <LBonnot@jeffcitymo.org>; Dittmer, Lisa <Ldittmer@jeffcitymo.org> Subject: RE: Coffee Shop, B & B, Oakbrook Properties, 309 & 311 Bolivar Street- Plan Review Comments, Engineering Division, 1st Review Hello Paul, The only comment by the Planning Division is to reference the assigned address — 311 Bolivar Street, on all plan sheets. We assigned a separate street number for the upper level Air BnB unit of 309 Bolivar, so maybe reference that as well. Sincerely, Eric Barron Planning Manager City of Jefferson 573-634-6419 From: Wade, Shane Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 2021 5:08 PM To:'psamson@cmps-inc.com' <psamson@cmps-inc.com> Cc: Kreyling, Matt <MKreyling@ieffcitymo.org>; Barron, Eric <EBarron@ieffcitymo.org>; Bange, David <DBange@ieffcitymo.org>; Fontana, Don <DFontana@ieffcitymo.org>; Bonnot, Len <LBonnot@ieffcitymo.org>; Dittmer, Lisa <Idittmer@ieffcitymo.org> Subject: Coffee Shop, B & B, Oakbrook Properties, 309 & 311 Bolivar Street- Plan Review Comments, Engineering Division, 1st Review Paul - Please find below the Plan Review comments from the Engineering Division concerning the project submittal referenced above, submitted April 20, 2021 for review. Topo Survey & Demolition, C001, Sheet 1 of 4- 1. Update the address references for all locations on the site plan sheets to 309 & 311 Bolivar Street (all sheets). Site Plan C100, Sheet 2 of 4- 1. Provide sizes for the water service and meter referenced in Site Notes 8 & 9. 2. Is the proposed signage to be alighted sign? If so, will the building/ electrical plans reference the location of the electric service to the sign? 3. Do you have a detail or reference to a standard detail, for the 6"raised concrete island noted in Site Note 24? 4. For Storm Drainage Note P 1-2, the UFL = 574.00 instead of 554.00. CoorespondencefTimeline Packet Page 20 5. Drainage calculations and a drainage area map for piping and storm structures are needed to verify information provided for the storm drainage structures. Please provide. Grading & Erosion Control Plan, CI01, Sheet 3 of 4- 1. Provide owner/ maintenance contact information for the swq/ detention basin shown. 2. Drainage swq calculations and a drainage area map for swq are needed to verify information provided for the storm drainage structures. Please provide. 3. Is a concrete washout detail needed for the site, if needed? (re: SWQ Benefits List) Construction Details, C10Z Sheet 4 of 4- 2. See item 3. above for C100. 3. See item 3. above for C101. DA Map & Drainage Calculations- 1. See items 5. above for C100 and 2. above for C101. SWQ/ ESC Checklists, Benefits Summary- 1. See items 1. & 3. above for C101. We have no additional comments. I believe that the Planning Division has reviewed the plan, and may comment by separate email. Please double-check with Eric Barron. We will need four (4) sets of the final revised plan for final approval/ resubmittal. Thanks. Shane Wade Shane Wade, P.E. Plan Review and Development Engineer City of Jefferson Dept. of Public Works Engineering Division 573.634.6449 0 573.634.6457 F swadeCa) ieffcitymo.ors CoorespondencelTimeline Packet Page 21 From: Jeff Schaeperkoetter <jwschae@hotmail.com> Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2021 2:55 PM To: Barron, Eric <EBarron@jeffcitymo.org> Cc: Wade, Shane <SWade@jeffcitymo.org> Subject: Re: Tract division application Thanks, Eric. Sent from my iPhone On Jun 24, 2021, at 1:35 PM, Barron, Eric <EBarron@ieffcitymo.org wrote: Hello Jeff, Yes, the proposed tract division has be received, distributed, and is currently in process of review. We have been inundated lately with plan reviews of various sorts, but your submittal should be at or near the top of our first in/first out process. Sincerely, Eric Barron Planning Manager City of Jefferson 573-634-6419 From: Jeff Schaeperkoetter <Iwschae@hotmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2021 10:13 AM To: Barron, Eric <EBarron(c@ieffcitymo.org> Subject: Tract division application Eric: CMPS submitted the tract division application on June 7th. I have a contract with Union Pacific that is time - sensitive, and I don't want this to fall between the cracks. Sorry to bother you with this, but could you check and make sure this has come to the attention of the right people? Jeff Sent from Mail for Windows 10 CoorespondencelTimeline Packet Page 22 From: Jeff Schaeperkoetter <jwschae@hotmail.com> Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2021 9:58 PM To: Barron, Eric <EBarron@jeffcitymo.org> Cc: Wade, Shane <SWade@jeffcitymo.org>; dsmith@cmps-inc.com; brockwell@cmps-inc.com; Barge, David <DBange@jeffcitymo.org>; Bonnot, Len <LBonnot@jeffcitymo.org>; Dittmer, Lisa <Idittmer@ jeffcitymo.org> Subject: Re: Property Boundary and Tract Division Survey 600 block of West McCarty Street, - Plan Review Comments, Engineering and Planning Divisions, 1st Review Thanks, Eric, that makes sense. I will get back with you tomorrow on this after talking with Darrell about the standard language they have. Jeff Sent from my iPhone On Jul 15, 2021, at 9:18 PM, Barron, Eric <EBarron(c?ieffcitymo.ore> wrote: Hello Jeff, The note is meant to recognize that the tract does not qualify as an individual buildable lot (as it, by itself, does not have street frontage - alley access does not qualify as street frontage). It is not meant to state that nothing could be built on it. It can be used for future expansion by you - as your adjacent property does have street frontage. The city code section is: 35-50.C.1- all lots must have access on a dedicated public street. The note should probably be a bit longer, perhaps reading as: This tract does not qualify as an individual buildable lot, and is intended to be transferred and combined with the neighboring tract recorded in Book _, Page A tract must meet city code requirements to qualify as a buildable lot. CMPS has a standard note (similarto the above) that they put on parcel divisions. This one was missing that note, hence the staff comment. The purpose of course is to keep from any misunderstandings - we wouldn't want a future property owner to come in wanting to build something on a landlocked lot. If there's an issue with the language we can of course talk about that, but we need either a note to this effect, or, to include your tract in the survey and formally combine them so they'd be a single tract (which would greatly complicate things). I think I mentioned the note at our discussion at the front desk. Again, it's not meant to keep you from building on and using the property, it's meant to keep you from selling it individually off to someone else who would then want to build on it (with only alley access). If you have any questions I'm happy to discuss. Sincerely, Eric Barron Planning Manager City of Jefferson 573-634-6419 On Jul 15, 2021, at 8:03 PM, Jeff Schaeperkoetter <iwschae@hotmail.com> wrote: Coorespondence/Timeline Packet Page 23 Shane: Thanks for sending this to me, but I am perplexed about Comment 5 from the Planning Department. Although I mentioned this to Eric in a pre -application meeting, perhaps it was not clear from the application that Oakbrook Properties, L.L.C., has the contract with the railroad, and this property, obviously, adjoins our current property to the west which we are developing. If the new area does not qualify as a building site, I need to know what the qualifications are immediately so I can address that with the railroad. That limitation is certainly unexpected and will have a significant impact on our transaction. We have a closing date coming up in early August, and I need to know what disqualifies this new tract and what, if any, remediations are available that might change that. A reference to the City Code would be helpful to me. Would you please ask the Planning Department commenter to reply to me as quickly as possible? I know that Darrell of CMPS has questions about Comment 1 as well. On that one, I guess I am confused about why I am having to bear the expense of showing the detail on an adjoining tract which is not a part of the tract division application. Could the existing detail on that adjoining lot be omitted like it is on the fire station property? Jeff +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++++++++ Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Wade, Shane Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2021 10:26 AM To: dsmith@cmps-inc.com; Brian Rockwell <brockwell@cmps-inc.com> (brockwell cmps-inc.com) Cc: Barron, Eric; Bange, David; Bonnot, Len; Dittmer, Lisa;'iwschae@hotmail.com' Subject: Property Boundary and Tract Division Survey 600 block of West McCarty Street, - Plan Review Comments, Engineering and Planning Divisions, 1st Review Darrel and Brian - Please find below the Plan Review comments from the Engineering and Planning Divisions concerning the survey submittal referenced above, submitted June 8, 2021 for review. Parcel Division Survey- 1. For the adjacent property at 620 West McCarty, please update what is shown for the building and for the parking area. A building expansion and parking area expansion has occurred for this property, since the previous survey was performed in 2002. Recent aerial photography should show updated layouts. Coorespondence/Timeline Packet Page 24 The dimension offset from the back property line will change due to the fairly recent building addition. Label the building on the adjacent property as a "restaurant". 2. Provide a vicinity map for the survey. 3. Please remove "GISP" from the signature block for Sonny Sanders signature. 4. In the title block, the owner referenced should be Union Pacific instead of Mo. Pacific Railroad. Please clarify. 5. Please add an additional note that "Tract B-1 does not qualify as an individual building lot" to the survey notes on the drawing (Planning Division comment). 6. Label the dimension N 42d 14m39s E 1.33' in similar fashion to all other property dimensions for Tract B-2. We have no additional comments. Please resubmit at least two (2) original revised documents addressing the comments above, along with the recording fee for the final submittal. Let us know if you have any questions concerning the comments. Thanks. Shane Wade Shane Wade, P.E. Plan Review and Development Engineer City of Jefferson Dept. of Public Works Engineering Division 573.634.6449 0 573.634.6457 F swade@ieffcitymo.org Coorespondence/Timeline Packet Page 25 From: Jeff Schaeperkoetter <jwschae@hotmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2022 9:07 AM To: Barron, Eric <EBarron@jeffersoncitymo.gov> Subject: Re: 309 Bolivar - Parking off of Alley Eric: Thanks for your note. I am aware, of course, of the fire department's concerns and certainly plan to talk to Chief Schofield before any request is submitted. Jeff Sent from my iPhone On May 18, 2022, at 8:05 AM, Barron, Eric <EBarron@ieffersoncitymo.eov> wrote: Hello Jeff, thank you for the reply. The Fire Department has some pretty specific concerns about the alley and the parking off of it, which were flushed out during the PUD review process and subsequent adoption of that plan by the City Council. You can propose changes, but I'm not sure we're going to be able to process them administratively given that they were fairly specific items incorporated into the plan sent to Council. If you have a proposal in mind, you can send it to me and we'll distribute it for review/comment. Alternatively you could discuss any ideas you have directly with the Fire Department. Barring approval of a revised plan, it would be expected that the parking adjacent to the alley would be installed according to the approved plan, including installation of the missing island. We wouldn't be in a position to issue a certificate of occupancy for the building with these plan elements missing. Sincerely, Eric Barron Planning Manager City of Jefferson 573-634-6419 From: Jeff Schaeperkoetter <iwschae@hotmail.com> Sent: Monday, May 16, 2022 4:18 PM To: Barron, Eric <EBarron@ieffersoncitymo.gov> Subject: RE: 309 Bolivar - Parking off of Alley Eric: Thanks for the e-mail. I had specifically requested that the concrete island not be installed at the time the back parking lot was poured. I knew that the front parking lot was going to be a bigger project, and that the front's completion was weather -dependent, and wanted to maximize on -site parking as much as possible, and that island's completion would obstruct parking in the rear. Subsequently, I have considered filing an application to seek approval of an amendment to the final PUD plan to allow straight -in parking rather than the parking provided for in the final PUD Plan as approved. In reading the city code, I think this may be a minor amendment as contemplated by the code. My thinking here is that the additional parking of at least 2 or 3 spaces would be beneficial without significant impact on the area. I know the City is dealing with parking issues on a much larger scale in the downtown area, and the long-term benefit of additional on -site parking may be attractive to the City as well. Coorespondence/Timeline Packet Page 26 Jeff Sent from Mail for Windows From: Barron, Eric<EBarron@ieffersoncitymo.gov> Sent: Monday, May 16, 2022 8:25:00 AM To: Jeff Schaeperkoetter <iwschae@hotmail.com> Subject: 309 Bolivar - Parking off of Alley Hello Jeff, I wanted to check in and make sure that the parking arrangement off of the alley at your new building was being installed according to plan, with 90 degree parking spaces off of a driveway accessed from the alley (rather than head in parking from the alley). I realize that the striping is not in yet. The concrete island adjacent to the alley connection to Bolivar (note #24 on the attached plan) doesn't appear to be in place. - - --- - - 411: LOStTC\' L.P i --�. . m.v Eric Barron Planning Manager City of Jefferson (573) 634-6419 Coorespondence/Timeline Packet Page 27 From: Jeff Schaeperkoetter <jwschae@hotmail.com> Sent: Sunday, June 5, 2022 6:05 PM To: Schofield, Matt <MSchofield @jeffersoncitymo.gov>; Barron, Eric <EBarron@jeffersoncitymo.gov> Cc: Scott Schaeperkoetter <Scott@signaturehomesjc.com>; Turner, Jason <JTurner@jeffersoncitymo.gov> Subject: RE: Parking area at rear of new building Chief Schofield and Eric: We are looking to a completion of the building later on this month, and I am getting nervous that the parking issue is still out there without a resolution. I will be heading out of town Thursday for a few days. Could I hear from somebody on Monday to see where we are on this? Jeff Sent from Mail for Windows From: Schofield, Matt Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2022 6:52 PM To: Jeff Schaeperkoetter Cc: Scott Schaeperkoetter: Turner, Jason Subject: Re: Parking area at rear of new building Let's look to early next week, how does 1:30 on Tuesday sound? Sent from my iPhone On May 25, 2022, at 8:00 AM, Jeff Schaeperkoetter <iwschae@hotmail.com> wrote: Anytime today or tomorrow, then on Friday before 9 or after 3. Sent from my iPhone On May 25, 2022, at 7:55 AM, Schofield, Matt <MSchofield @ieffersoncitymo.gov> wrote: Mr. Schaeperkoetter, Our schedule is tight this week, what time were you thinking? Matthew D. Schofield, Fire Chief Jefferson City Fire Department City of Jefferson, Missouri mschofield@ieffersoncitymo.gov 573-634-6401 15S WC 7216169721 This e-mail transmission, and any documents, files or previous e-mail messages attached to it contains information that is confidential, and may be legally privileged, and is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, printing, distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify the sender by telephone or return e-mail and delete the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in any manner. Thank you From: Jeff Schaeperkoetter <iwschae@hotmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2022 8:01 PM To: Schofield, Matt <MSchofield@ieffersoncitymo.gov> Cc: Scott Schaeperkoetter <scott@signaturehomesic.com> Subject: Parking area at rear of new building Coorespondence/Timeline Packet Page 28 Chief Schofield: I was hoping it would be possible to squeeze into your schedule in the next few days what I think will be a fairly short meeting at the job site, regarding a matter of some urgency. Before that meeting, I thought it would be more efficient to lay out my thoughts via this e-mail. You may recall that the parking area for our new building between the building and Wall Way was formatted in the PUD Plan approved by the City so that the 4 parking spaces there would be oriented parallel with Wall Way. The fire department had expressed concerns regarding potential obstructions to the department's use of Wall Way. As that back parking lot was being poured, and in an attempt to facilitate on -site parking during the construction of the front parking lot, I asked that the back lot not be finished with that small island along Wall Way at the entrance from Bolivar, as provided in the Final site plan. That back parking lot is 26 feet deep from the sidewalk to Wall Way, which is, as I am told, 7 feet more than the 19 feet typically required. As a result, if vehicles were allowed to park back there perpendicular to the building (straight -in parking), they would have that extra room to back out and access Wall Way for their exit. That area is wide enough, even with the wider space required for the one handicapped space, to permit 7 or 8 spaces, which is 3 or 4 more than those which will be available with the approved parking plan. We would limit the use of that back parking lot to employees and the occasional users of the AirBnB so that the use of the lot will be for those who will not be in and out of the lot frequently. Signage will be developed to restrict customers from using the lot. Deliveries will be made through the front parking area. I believe that the perpendicular orientation of the parking will not adversely impact the fire department's access to or use of Wall Way to a greater extent than that which will occur with the plan as approved. The change will allow additional on -site parking, which will reduce street parking in the area and the resulting impact on vehicular, pedestrian and cycling users. Additionally, it will enhance the parking for our project. The request for an amendment to the final plan can be approved administratively, and, of course, the City will not consider that as long as the fire department maintains its position. Because of the imminent completion of the building (we hope to have it done in the next month or so), the City will also not issue a certificate of occupancy until the back parking lot and the rest of the improvements are completed according to the plan. The completion of the small island and striping the lot per the approved plan can be done quickly, now that the front parking lot and apron are completed. I thought I would reach back out to you to see if the department's concerns are somehow alleviated by this lengthy explanation. If that were the case, your assistance in passing that along to Eric Barron might be the next step, as I think the administrative approval of the amendment can occur pretty quickly. Of course, if that is not the case, I will not be filing the request for amendment. Chief, I understand the department's expressed concerns, and your position on this will not diminish my appreciation for the department's cooperation as we have moved along here. I just thought it was important to at least give you my thoughts. My telephone number is 573-301-7514 and I will be available any time Wednesday and Thursday, with some limited time as well on Friday. I hope you are willing to meet me up there, so we can show you "on the ground" the specifics of the request. You may want Chief Turner to be there as well. Jeff Sent from Mail for Windows Coorespondence/Timeline Packet Page 29 From: Jeff Schaeperkoetter <jwschae@hotmail.com> Sent: Friday, June 3, 2022 4:01 PM To: Barron, Eric <EBarron@jeffersoncitymo.gov> Subject: RE: Project Thanks, Eric. Sent from Mail for Windows From: Barron, Eric Sent: Friday, June 3, 2022 3:54 PM To: Jeff Schaeperkoetter Subject: RE: Project Hello Jeff, Yes, a sign permit is still required. Sign permit applications are available online at: https://cros4files.revize.com/ieffersoncitymo/PPS/Sign%2ODisplay%20App%202022.pdf They are processed by the Building Regulations Division, and can be submitted to the permit technician at the front desk in a similar manner as bundling permit applications. Sincerely, Eric Barron Planning Manager City of Jefferson 573-634-6419 From: Jeff Schaeperkoetter <iwschae@hotmail.com> Sent: Friday, June 3, 2022 3:51 PM To: Barron, Eric <EBarron@ieffersoncitymo.gov> Subject: Project I spoke with the fire department on Tuesday and they were going to get with you to discuss next steps for the parking. On another matter, please advise if, since the sign was part of the approved site plan, an application for a sign permit is required. This may be in another person's domain, if so, please forward this to them. Jeff Sent from Mail for Windows Coorespondencerrimeline Packet Page 30 From: Schofield, Matt <MSchofield@jeffersoncitymo.gov> Sent: Monday, June 6, 2022 6:30 PM To: Jeff Schaeperkoetter <jwschae@hotmail.com> Cc: Barron, Eric <EBarron@jeffersoncitymo.gov>; Scott Schaeperkoetter <scott@signaturehomesjc.com>; Turner, Jason <1Turner@jeffersoncitymo.gov> Subject: Re: Parking area at rear of new building On May 31, Fire Department representatives met with Jeff Schaeperkoetter to review the request for additional parking of seven or more spaces with future parking needs considered towards the East side of the property and elimination of the curb originally agreed to in the PUD. The Fire Department is concerned this will create additional static and transient traffic that will limit access on the dead-end alley and restrict emergency vehicles, as well as interfere with required access to the communications tower site at Fire Station 1. After careful consideration of the information provided on the request for additional parking already constructed at the rear of Three Story Coffee the Fire Department believes that the Final PUD site plan approved on 7-9-2021 already represents a substantial compromise on the part of the Fire Department that takes into account the concerns noted above. It is not in the interest of the public that we serve to further complicate traffic congestion in this limited access area. Matthew D. Schofield, Fire Chief Jefferson City Fire Department City of Jefferson, Missouri mschofield@ieffersoncitymo.gov 573-634-6401 15S WC 7216169721 This e-mail transmission, and any documents, files or previous e-mail messages attached to it contains information that is confidential, and may be legally privileged, and is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, printing, distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify the sender by telephone or return e-mail and delete the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in any manner. Thank you On Jun 5, 2022, at 6:05 PM, Jeff Schaeperkoetter <iwschae@hotmail.com> wrote: Chief Schofield and Eric: We are looking to a completion of the building later on this month, and I am getting nervous that the parking issue is still out there without a resolution. I will be heading out of town Thursday for a few days. Could I hear from somebody on Monday to see where we are on this? Jeff Sent from Mail for Windows From: Schofield, Matt Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2022 6:52 PM To: Jeff Schaeperkoetter Cc: Scott Schaeperkoetter: Turner, Jason Subject: Re: Parking area at rear of new building Let's look to early next week, how does 1:30 on Tuesday sound? Sent from my iPhone Coorespondencerrimeline Packet Page 31 On May 25, 2022, at 8:00 AM, Jeff Schaeperkoetter <jwschae@hotmail.com> wrote: Anytime today or tomorrow, then on Friday before 9 or after 3. Sent from my iPhone On May 25, 2022, at 7:55 AM, Schofield, Matt <MSchofield @ieffersoncitymo.gov> wrote: Mr. Schaeperkoetter, Our schedule is tight this week, what time were you thinking? Matthew D. Schofield, Fire Chief Jefferson City Fire Department City of Jefferson, Missouri mschofield@ieffersoncitymo.gov 573-634-6401 15S WC 72161 69721 This e-mail transmission, and any documents, files or previous e-mail messages attached to it contains information that is confidential, and may be legally privileged, and is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, printing, distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify the sender by telephone or return e-mail and delete the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in any manner. Thank you From: Jeff Schaeperkoetter <iwschae@hotmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2022 8:01 PM To: Schofield, Matt <MSchofield@ieffersoncitymo.gov> Cc: Scott Schaeperkoetter <scott@signaturehomesic.com> Subject: Parking area at rear of new building Chief Schofield: I was hoping it would be possible to squeeze into your schedule in the next few days what I think will be a fairly short meeting at the job site, regarding a matter of some urgency. Before that meeting, I thought it would be more efficient to lay out my thoughts via this e-mail. You may recall that the parking area for our new building between the building and Wall Way was formatted in the PUD Plan approved by the City so that the 4 parking spaces there would be oriented parallel with Wall Way. The fire department had expressed concerns regarding potential obstructions to the department's use of Wall Way. As that back parking lot was being poured, and in an attempt to facilitate on -site parking during the construction of the front parking lot, I asked that the back lot not be finished with that small island along Wall Way at the entrance from Bolivar, as provided in the Final site plan. That back parking lot is 26 feet deep from the sidewalk to Wall Way, which is, as I am told, 7 feet more than the 19 feet typically required. As a result, if vehicles were allowed to park back there perpendicular to the building (straight -in parking), they would have that extra room to back out and access Wall Way for their exit. Coorespondence/Timeline Packet Page 32 That area is wide enough, even with the wider space required for the one handicapped space, to permit 7 or 8 spaces, which is 3 or 4 more than those which will be available with the approved parking plan. We would limit the use of that back parking lot to employees and the occasional users of the AirBnB so that the use of the lot will be for those who will not be in and out of the lot frequently. Signage will be developed to restrict customers from using the lot. Deliveries will be made through the front parking area I believe that the perpendicular orientation of the parking will not adversely impact the fire department's access to or use of Wall Way to a greater extent than that which will occur with the plan as approved. The change will allow additional on -site parking which will reduce street parking in the area and the resulting impact on vehicular, pedestrian and cycling users. Additionally, it will enhance the parking for our project. The request for an amendment to the final plan can be approved administratively, and, of course, the City will not consider that as long as the fire department maintains its position. Because of the imminent completion of the building (we hope to have it done in the next month or so), the City will also not issue a certificate of occupancy until the back parking lot and the rest of the improvements are completed according to the plan. The completion of the small island and striping the lot per the approved plan can be done quickly, now that the front parking lot and apron are completed. I thought I would reach back out to you to see if the department's concerns are somehow alleviated by this lengthy explanation. If that were the case, your assistance in passing that along to Eric Barron might be the next step, as I think the administrative approval of the amendment can occur pretty quickly. Of course, if that is not the case, I will not be filing the request for amendment. Chief, I understand the department's expressed concerns, and your position on this will not diminish my appreciation for the department's cooperation as we have moved along here. I just thought it was important to at least give you my thoughts. My telephone number is 573-301-7514 and I will be available any time Wednesday and Thursday, with some limited time as well on Friday. I hope you are willing to meet me up there, so we can show you "on the ground" the specifics of the request. You may want Chief Turner to be there as well. Jeff Sent from Mail for Windows Coorespondence/Timeline Packet Page 33 From: Jeff Schaeperkoetter <jwschae@hotmail.com> Sent: Monday, June 27, 2022 10:22 PM To: Barron, Eric <EBarron@jeffersoncitymo.gov> Cc: Scott Schaeperkoetter <scott@signaturehomesjc.com> Subject: RE: 3-Story Coffee - request for Temporary CO Eric: Thanks for your note. I apologize for the late response, but I first saw this when I was at the St. Louis airport picking up family in for the holidays, and am just now getting to my computer. I wanted you to have this response when you arrive in the morning to emphasize the importance of the request that Scott has made. I was aware that Scott had requested the temporary certificate of occupancy last week, and that you were not back in the office until today. I know that Scott made the request because he was told by city personnel that temporary certificates had been granted by the City in similar circumstances. I think you may be aware that the request was for the ground floor of the building, which is complete, while the upper story portion of the building can be completed within the 45-day period of the temporary certificate. The issuance of the temporary certificate is critical. The business to be located on that main floor closed its location on Dunklin Street on Saturday so that the equipment could be relocated to the new building and connected for its use on opening. That opening has been planned for Wednesday, which gives us tomorrow to get the temporary certificate in place. The back parking lot can not easily be finished at this point because the dumpster needs to remain in place for debris removal purposes, and trucks with trailers will need access to the rear of the building through which second floor completion with be accomplished. I want to make it clear that we will be requesting that the City approve an amendment to the final PUD Plan, through whatever process the City deems necessary, to provide for increased pull -in parking spaces in that rear lot. You indicated that I had "no success" with the Fire Department after discussing this. While they did not agree, I frankly found their basis for that decision to be unreasonable, and I am not willing to accept the Fire Department as the final authority on the parking amendment issue. Frankly, it denies my company as the owner of the property the full and unfettered use of a public street. I know that the City code allows minor amendments to the plan to be approved by staff, and that staff has apparently relied on the Fire Department to determine that this is not a minor amendment. If that means that the final decision on the matter must be made through the Planning and Zoning and City Council process, I am fine with that, even though the City knows that the process of completing the parking lot according to the current plan will cost me a significant amount of money. I would respectfully request that the temporary certificate be issued immediately so that occupancy and operations may commence as planned on Wednesday. If that can not be done, I would like to know by Tuesday noon, so we can arrange the necessary contractors to finish the parking lot as soon as possible. That may mean, of course, that those finishes will need to be removed and re -done at our cost if the amendment to be proposed is accepted by the City Council. I have cc'd Scott on this. To facilitate our progress, please "reply all". Jeff Sent from Mail for Windows Coorespondence/Timeline Packet Page 34 From: Barron, Eric Sent: Monday, June 27, 2022 1:00 PM To: Jeff Schaeperkoetter Subject: 3-Story Coffee - request for Temporary CO Hello Jeff, We have a request from Scott with Signature Homes for a temporary CO. We still have the outstanding issue of the rear parking area. I understand you had discussions with the Fire Department on changes with no success. Can you state what your plans are for the rear parking area at this point? Eric Barron Planning Manager City of Jefferson (573) 634-6419 Coorespondence/Timeline Packet Page 35 From: Jeff Schaeperkoetter <jwschae@hotmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2022 4:25 PM To: Kreyling, Matt <MKreyling@jeffersoncitymo.gov> Cc: Scott Schaeperkoetter <Scott@signaturehomesjc.com>; Barron, Eric <EBarron@jeffersoncitymo.gov>; Sanders, Sonny <SSanders@jeffersoncitymo.gov>; Vande Voorde, Dan <DVandeVoorde@jeffersoncitymo.gov> Subject: Re: TCO for Three Story Coffee Matt: Thanks for getting this done in so timely a fashion for us. We will let Dan know when the roaster is moved. Jeff Sent from my iPhone On Jun 28, 2022, at 3:51 PM, Kreyling, Matt <MKreyling@ieffersoncitymo.gov> wrote: Jeff, Attached is the TCO for the lower level at 311 Bolivar for Three Story Coffee to begin operating. Please be sure to contact our mechanical inspector (Dan VandeVoorde) prior to beginning operation of the coffee roaster being installed on the west end of the building. If you have any questions or need anything else, please feel free to call or email at any time. Matthew Kreyling, CBO Building Official City of Jefferson 320 E McCarty Street Jefferson City, MO 65101 T — (573) 634-6410 m kreyling@ieffersoncitVmo.gov www.leffe rsoncitVmo.gov Coorespondence/Timeline Packet Page 36 0 TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE Or OCCUPANCY Department of Planning & Protective Services Division of Building Regulations 320 East McCarty Street, Jefferson City MO 65101 Phone:573.634-6410 Building Location: Type of Occupancy: Type of Construction: Design Occupant Load: Related Building Permit: Description Sprinkler: OWNER CAPITAL OPPORTUNITY FUND L L C 320 NISHODSE BLUFF DR JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 Fax:573-634-6562 311 BOLIVAR ST A-2 (Assembly) V-0 75 (lower level only) BP21-0606 Construction of a new 2 story building and associated site improvements. NFPA 13 CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE ITOMES OF JEFFERSON CITY INC. P.O. BOX 105735 JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65110 Restrictions: This certificate is to allow occupancy and operation of the coffee shop on the lower level only. The upper level and north parking area shall be limited to construction access only until brought into conformance with the previously submitted and approved plans. This certificate expires August 12, 2022. This is to certify that the premises has been Inspected and are in compliance with the building codes and ordinances of the City Insofar as can be determined by a visual inspection of the building. Current Adopted Codes: 2014 National Electrical Code 2015 International Building Code 2015 International Plumbing Code 2015 International Residential Code 2015 International Fire Code 2015 International Existing Building Code 2015 International Mechanical Code 7015 International Fuel Gas Code 2015 International Swimming Pool and spa Code The City does not make any guarantee or warranty as to the condition of these premises or the quality of workmanship in the construction or rehabilitation of the premises. Nor does the City assume any liability arising from the inspection and issuance of this Temporary Certificate of Occupancy. It Is specifically understood that this Certificate becomes null and void when secured through fraud or when changes In construction, or use Is made without the approval of the Department of Plann' & Protective services. Issued by: K Date: MattWj Kreyling, i t tldiU Official Coorespondence/Timeline Packet Page 37 From: Jeff Schaeperkoetter <jwschae@hotmail.com> Sent: Monday, July 11, 2022 8:10 AM To: Barron, Eric <EBarron@jeffersoncitymo.gov> Cc: Sanders, Sonny <SSanders@jeffersoncitymo.gov>; Schofield, Matt<MSchofield@jeffersoncitymo.gov>; Turner, Jason <JTu rner@ jeffersoncitymo.gov> Subject: RE: Parking area at rear of new building Eric: I will be filing the amendment form, hopefully this morning. I do appreciate that you responded last week in a timely fashion for me to meet the filing deadline. I still think that this should be considered as a minor change. The use of (b)(2) and (d)(4) as the basis for staff deciding it is not a minor change is interesting to me. Is this really a relocation orjust a change of orientation? Does any increase in parking spaces increase the demand for traffic circulation? Taking this through the Planning and Zoning and City Council process just adds to the time and expense of the project. Also, my memory may be slipping, but I do not recall that the parking area was any significant part of the City Council meeting. Staff may have had pre -meeting discussions with council members, but I was not privy to those discussions. I guess the recording of the meeting would be the available, and it might be good for you to provide me with that. All that being said, if staff reconsiders and determines that this is a minor change that it can approve administratively, I am obviously fine with that. Jeff Sent from Mail for Windows From: Barron, Eric Sent: Friday, July 8, 2022 5:12 PM To: Jeff Schaeperkoetter Cc: Sanders, Sonny; Schofield, Matt; Turner, Jason Subject: RE: Parking area at rear of new building Hello Jeff, I'll direct you to the Major PUD Plan Amendment process for this request. Staff do not believe it falls into a Minor PUD Amendment category for the following reasons: Section 35-74.C.5.b.(2) regarding minor changes not to relocate parking areas closer than 10 feet to a street right-of-way line. Section 35-74.C.5.d.(4) regarding minor changes not being authorized for increased demand for traffic circulation. Also, the parking area adjacent to the alley was a major item of review, consideration, and presentation to the City Council. It is staffs view that only a City Council action can amend such an item. The process would be for an Amendment to the Final PUD Plan. The process is essentially the same as the initial PUD approval process, and involves public notification (including mailed letters to neighbors and property sign posting), public hearing before the P&Z Commission, and public hearing before the City Council. Application form is available at: https://cros4files.revize.com/ieffersoncitymo/P&Z and BOA postings/app-PUD- Rev ised % 20J u Iy % 202018. pdf Applicable attachments would be: - Written narrative describing the request. - Site Plan drawing showing the requested change. - Application fee of $700 - Any other relevant information. The PUD approval at the City Council had some specific references to the alley. I have attached Ordinance 16083. Coorespondence/Timeline Packet Page 38 The Final PUD Plan (approved administratively by staff per Section 35-74.C.4.e) is also attached. The application deadline for the August meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission is Monday, July 11. The Filing Deadline Calendar, with meeting schedules for both the P&Z Commission and City Council, is available at: https://cros4files.revize.com/ieffersoncitVmo/2022%20PZ%20Filins/20Calendar%20Public.pdf If you have any questions let me know. Sincerely, Eric Barron Planning Manager City of Jefferson 573-634-6419 From: Jeff Schaeperkoetter <iwschaeC@hotmail.com> Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2022 2:36 PM To: Barron, Eric <EBarron(@ieffersoncitymo.gov> Cc: Schofield, Matt<MSchofield()ieffersoncitymo.gov>; Turner, Jason <JTurner@ieffersoncitymo.eoy> Subject: FW: Parking area at rear of new building Eric: As I indicated to you earlier, I will be filing a request to amend the PUD Plan for the property at 309/311 Bolivar Street. I want to make sure that I follow the correct procedure, and am relying on Section 35-74 for that procedure. Please advise that I am relying on the proper code section for filing the proposed amendment. I note that that section requires the applicant to provide the Director with an envelope and notice addressed to any person who testified regarding the project at a prior public meeting. I recall that a neighbor testified at the City Council meeting, and would request that you provide me with the name and address of all persons who testified at either the Planning and Zoning Commission or Council meeting. If you would prefer, I can glean that information from the minutes of the meetings, in which case I would need a copy of them, which can be sent to me electronically. I will be requesting that the amendment be deemed a minor change, and, of course, am prepared to present the request to the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council as necessary. I assume that, if the P & Z process is necessitated by a staff decision that this is not a minor change, there may be a notice requirement, and I would appreciate it if you would provide me with the notice requirements so I can determine whether the August 4 P & Z meeting is a possibility. Your earliest possible response is requested as the timing of this is important to us. Jeff Schaeperkoetter Capitol Opportunity Fund, L.L.C. Sent from Mail for Windows Coorespondence/Timeline Packet Page 39 On Aug 29, 2022, at 1:34 PM, Barron, Eric <EBarron@jeffersoncitymo.gov> wrote: Hi Jeff, I'd probably refer you to the law department on any contract regarding the tower. The meeting at the City Council on September 6 is just bill introduction. If there are concerns about the language of the bill there should be ample time to address them prior to public hearing/bill passage on September 19. It would be a standard bill approving a PUD plan amendment, with the condition that the P&Z Commission placed on it. Sincerely, Eric Barron Planning Manager City of Jefferson 573-634-6419 From: Jeff Schaeperkoetter <jwschae@hotmail.com> Sent: Monday, August 29, 2022 1:27 PM To: Barron, Eric <EBarron@jeffersoncitymo.gov> Cc: Sanders, Sonny <SSanders@jeffersoncitymo.gov>; Kreyling, Matt <MKreyling@jeffersoncitymo.gov> Subject: RE: City Council meeting on proposed amendment Thanks, Eric. I had intended to cc Mr. Sanders and Mr. Kreyling as they were on a previous email. Since the concerns expressed by staff did not only involve the fire department's issues, I just wanted to inquire so I can be prepared for the hearing before the City Council. I have rearranged a flight schedule to come back to Jefferson City early for the Council meeting, and learning the bill language and recommendation on the Thursday or Friday before the council meeting does not provide much of an opportunity to prepare for the hearing. I have asked Kortney to give me a link to the P & Z hearing. To help me prepare further for the City Council hearing, I would also like a copy of the contract with the tower company so I can see the language guaranteeing them access to the tower site. I am not sure who would have this, so let me know if I need to contact somebody else. Jeff Sent from Mail for Windows From: Barron, Eric Sent: Monday, August 29, 2022 8:11 AM To: Jeff Schaeperkoetter Cc: Sanders, Sonny; Kreyling, Matt Subject: RE: City Council meeting on proposed amendment Hello Jeff, Coorespondencefrimeline Packet Page 40 Staff recommendations do not typically change between the P&Z and City Council meetings. That being said, if you're looking for feedback from the Fire Department on their thoughts, I'd refer you directly to them. I noticed that you copied Matt Kreyling (the Building Official) on this email. If you were intending Matt Schofield (the Fire Chief) you may have tagged the wrong email address. The City Council packets typically are posted by the Clerk by Thursday/Friday before the Council Meeting. That posting includes the bill and bill summary with recommendation. Sincerely, Eric Barron Planning Manager City of Jefferson 573-634-6419 From: Jeff Schaeperkoetter <iwschae@hotmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2022 1:56 PM To: Barron, Eric <EBarron@ieffersoncitymo.gov>; Kreyling, Matt<MKrevling@ieffersoncitymo.gov>; Sanders, Sonny <SSanders@ieffersoncitymo.gov> Subject: City Council meeting on proposed amendment Gentlemen: As I prepare for the City Council meeting, I need to inquire as to the position City staff (including the fire department) will take on the proposed amendment now that P & Z has recommended approval. Jeff Sent from Mail for Windows Coorespondence/Timeline Packet Page 41 City of Jefferson Department of Planning & Protective Services 320 E. McCarty St. Jefferson City, MO 65101 December 27, 2022 Dear Property Owner: Carrie Tercjin, Mayor Sonny Sanders, AICP, Director Phone: 573-634-6410 Fax: 573-634-6457 This letter is to notify you that the Jefferson City Planning and Zoning Commission will meet at 5:15 p.m. on Thursday, January 12, 2023 in the Council Chambers of the John G. Christy Municipal Building, 320 East McCarty Street to consider the following matters (see map on back): Case No. P23003 — 309 & 311 Bolivar Street, Amendment to PUD Plan. Request filed by Capital Opportunity Fund LLC, property owner, to amend the approved PUD Planned Unit Development plan to change the number and orientation of parking spaces located on the north side of the property adjacent to West Wall Way. The property is located on the northeast corner of the intersection of West McCarty Street and Bolivar Street and is described as the northerly part of Inlot No. 424, in the City of Jefferson, Cole County, Missouri. As a nearby landowner and/or neighbor, you are being provided notice of this hearing. Unfortunately, we are unable to record comments received by telephone, however, written comments may be directed to the Planning and Zoning Commission in one of the following ways: e-mail: JCPlanning@jeffersoncitymo.gov fax: Dept. of Planning and Protective Services / Planning Division 573-634-6457 mail: Dept. of Planning and Protective Services / Planning Division John G. Christy Municipal Building, 320 E. McCarty Street Jefferson City, MO 65101 Written comments received on or before 1:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting will be made a part of the official record and copied and distributed to Commission members at the meeting. Those unable to provide written comments in advance are invited to deliver their comments to the Commission Chairman only at the meeting. Correspondence received after 1:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting will be included in the official record, but there is no guarantee that copies will be made for distribution to all Commission members. For your information, this case is tentatively scheduled for a public hearing in front of the City Council on February 20, 2023. The City Council meets at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the John G. Christy Municipal Building, 320 East McCarty Street. Information regarding this case may be viewed on the Planning and Zoning Commission webpage at: https://www.ieffersoncitymo.gov/government/planning/planning and zoning commission php Please contact the Planning and Zoning Division via phone at 573.634.6573 with pertinent questions. Best Regards, Kortney Bliss Planner 1 Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. Please call (573) 634-6410 with questions regarding agenda items. Case No. P23003 309 & 311 Bolivar Street Major PUD Plan Amendment 185 ft. Notification Buffer N W + E S 0 40 80 160 240 320 Feet Jefferson City Planning and Zoning Commission Property Owner list Case No. P23003 309 & 311 Bolivar Street 1914 PROPERTIES L L C 1234 ASHBURY WAY WARDSVILLE, MO 65101 AMERICAN TOWER CORP SITE #274000 % PROPERTY TAX PO BOX 723597 ATLANTA, GA 31139-0597 AT&T SERVICES AT&T SERVICES TOWER PROPERTY TAX TEAM 754 PEACHTREE ST NE 16TH FLOOR ATLANTA, GA 30308 BRYAN, JOSEPH T 304 BOLIVAR ST JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 CAPITAL OPPORTUNITY FUND L L C 320 NISHODSE BLUFF DR JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 JEFFERSON CITY DISTRIBUTORS INC 301 CONSTITUTION DR JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65109 KALUGINA, SVETLANA 306 BOLIVAR ST JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 LINCOLN CENTER L L C 1718 HAYSELTON DR JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65109 MASTROGIANNIS PROPERTIES L L C 117 MONTEREY DR JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65109 MISSOURI LOCAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM (LAGERS) PO BOX 1665 JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65102 12/28/22 ST LOUIS, MO 63101 MISSOURI STATE OF PO BOX 809 JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65102 OAKBROOK PROPERTIES L L C 320 NISHODSE BLUFF JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 RADEMANN, EDWIN A & JUDY A TRUSTEES 4820 RAINBOW HILLS RD JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65109 SCHRIMPF, STEVEN 2820 BRUSH CREEK CT JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65109 SIMS, WILLIAM DOUGLAS TRUSTEE 330 BOLIVAR ST JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 WANSING, FRANKLIN G 310 BOLIVAR ST JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD Jefferson Cot} Planning Zom'ng Commission January U, 200 -3 Case No. P23004 1000 Block of Marshall Street Zeal Enterprise, LLC Final Subdivision Plat City of Jefferson Planning & Zoning Commission LOCATION MAP Case No. P23004 1000 Block of Marshall Street Final Subdivision Plat 0 45 90 180 Feet N W r E S City of Jefferson Planning and Zoning Corr mr ssion VICINITY Case No. P23004 N 1000 Block of Marshall Street 0 85 170 340 Feet Final Subdivision Plat w + E s PLANNING STAFF REPORT JEFFERSON CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION January 12, 2023 Case No. P23004 —1000 Block of Marshall St., Final Subdivision Plat of TC3C Subdivision. Request filed by Zeal Enterprise, LLC, property owner, for a Final Subdivision Plat for 1.88 acres proposing creation of 10 lots. The property is zoned RS-4 Medium Density Residential and is located on the Marshall Street cul-de-sac 250 feet north of East Franklin Street and with frontage also on Roland Street and is described as Part of the Northeast Quarter Section 18, Township 45 North, Range 11 West, in the City of Jefferson, Cole County, Missouri. (Central Missouri Professional Services, Consultant). Description of Proposal A request was filed for a final subdivision plat. Given the name TC3C Subdivision, this final subdivision plat would consist of 1.88 acres currently zoned RS-4 Medium Density Residential. The final subdivision plat would replat 6 existing lots into 10 new lots to be used for single family residential units. Review and Approval Process Final subdivision plats are reviewed in accordance with Chapter 33 The Subdivision Code and Chapter 35 Zoning Code with recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission and final decision by the City Council. Staff Analysis Current zoning designation of RS-4 requires the subdivision to comply with density and dimensional standards of that particular district. This includes lot size and width specifications. The RS-4 district requires a minimum net lot area 6,000 square feet and minimum lot width of 50 feet. Final Subdivision Plat request - information for consideration: Proposed Subdivision Name: TC3C Subdivision Total Acreage: 1.88 acres. Number of Lots: 10 proposed lots Lot Sizes: Lot 7 is proposed to be the largest at approximately 11,571 square feet and Lot 10 is proposed to be the smallest at approximately 6,458 square feet. Sidewalks: Existing sidewalk is located along Roland Street and the northern side of Marshall Street, ending at the cul-de-sac. Streets: No new streets are proposed. Utilities: Utilities exist in the vicinity. Fire Hydrant: Fire hydrants exist on Roland Street with proper spacing. A fire hydrant will likely need to be installed on Marshall Street to serve the proposed lots. Staff Recommendation The proposed final subdivision plat has been reviewed with respect to applicable City Code requirements such as those laid out in Chapter 33 The Subdivision Code and Chapter 35 Zoning Code. Technical comments from staff will need to be addressed. Staff recommended approval of the final plat of TOC Subdivision with the condition that technical comments by city staff be resolved. Form of Motion 1. Motion to recommend approval to the City Council of the requested final Subdivision plat of TOC Subdivision with the following conditions: a. Address technical comments from city staff. b. Submittal of finalized and signed plat prior to introduction to City Council. Jefferson City Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Engineering Division Staff Report Thursday, January 12, 2023, 5:15pm Item 6. — New Business/ Public Hearings Case No. P23004 — Re -Plat/ Final Plat of TC3C Subdivision, 1000 block of Marshall Street (RS-4) ENGINEERING STAFF RECOMMENDATION - Recommend approval. Existinjj Infrastructure Summary • Public infrastructure exists in the vicinity. • Storm water facilities exist in the vicinity. • Sanitary sewer facilities exist in the vicinity. • Streets are existing in the vicinity. • Sidewalk exists for this subdivision. • A street light exists for this subdivision. • Utilities will need to be checked, to see if adequate facilities are in place to serve these proposed lots. It does not appear that any fire hydrants are present in the vicinity of the cul-de-sac. Technical Review of the Plat • A few very minor technical review comments for the plat have been sent back to the consultant for consideration. These comments will need to be addressed prior to consideration of the plat by the City Council. The plat as presented is in good order. City of Jefferson Department of Planning & Protective Services 320 E. McCarty Street Jefferson City, MO 65101 Phone: 573-634-6410 icpla nnin q0ieffcitym o. orq www.jeffersoncitymo.gov APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION PLAT The undersigned hereby petitions the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council of the City of Jefferson, Missouri for the following type of subdivision: Preliminary Plat X Final Plat 1. Name of Subdivision: TC3C SUBDIVISION 2. General location: 1000 BLOCK OF MARSHALL 3. Existing/Proposed zoning: RS-4 4. Existing/Proposed use of the property: Single Family Residential 5. Size of the property in acres: 1.88 Acres 6. Total number of lots proposed: 10 7. Description of any variances to the Subdivision Regulations being requested (please note section number of the regulation below and attach a letter stating justification for the variance(s): None 8. Application filing fee: $ 400.00 Preliminary Plat = $500 + $5 p-er_lot__Minor Revision = $250 + $5 per lot Final Plat = $350 + $5 per -lot —to Preliminary Plat (Revised July 1, 2018)" 9. Signatures: Zeal Enterprise, LLC - Tim Joseph Property Owner Name (type or print) Paul Samson, PE Engineer Name (type or print) Date J. Brian Rockwell Surveyor Name (type or print) Contact person for this application: Name: Paul Samson - CMPS Phone Number: 573-634-3455 For Staff Use Only: Signa ure Engineer Signature urveyor z/z /z Date l2/;;I/z Date Address: 2500 E. McCarty St. Jefferson City, MO 65101 Email: psamson@cmps-inc.com Attachments: _ Variance request letter —Additional documentation Notes: Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. Page 1 of 5 z� Oti a 2 LL O a Z On ~ " Qw0 v m Sz dozQy— ita Vi W�O =y " "— Fz7vz g Q a 0:od�a OzU z ^ Vy M coVIZ= O W-a� Oz ego d-0 xa a{G{G Etiy V) L y2� �d WWWWW �t ' U °o� g�LL z3� a adz 4 WN 3 UaQ0 w. m 0 aad- 0' � ~ aog zzuw". s 5a mC o�Es �� wQ C w " I I I i I �a I � z z �. A I I I I I I 'i: z� .bv EY 5Fr �a53S X S 535�5 23 � Ey'fa 9 �;eQE n 3: 2 Eaa all< � H, al E s d FMlll E f5 I wI vl 32e !Z a E I � I 3 .. cn d ' y o ! 2n4 IT It i I umss rax.nuavn ---- � ! I L v� lzra4 TMSHM n B I uuv�vxoiro \ A SS !\)J1x1'ftMNfriWYLVN� t 4 �'!C S MA§ gM r � a 4 oY� � �36�Sad � a Rapt Se�9 � 3 $ e BRIM