HomeMy Public PortalAbout2023-01-12 packetNotice of Meeting & Tentative Agenda
let n /
•
4'P� •
•is
City of Jefferson Planning and Zoning Commission
Thursday, January 12, 2023 — 5:15 P.M.
Council Chambers, John G. Christy Municipal Building, 320 East McCarty Street
Enter through Main Lobby
All interested parties will be given a chance to be heard.
TENTATIVE AGENDA
1. Call to Order and Introductions
2. Procedural Matters
• Determination of quorum and designation of voting alternates
• Call for cases
• Receive and review requests for continuance
• Receive requests for reordering the agenda
• Format of hearing
• List of exhibits
3. Adoption of Agenda (as printed or reordered)
4. Approval of the Regular Meeting Minutes of December 08, 2022
5. Communications Received
6. New Business/Public Hearings
Case No. P23001 —1110 Cedar City Drive, Rezoning from M-1 to PUD and Preliminary Planned Unit
Development (PUD) Site Plan. Request filed by Jay and Kimberly Fischer, property owners, for rezoning
of approximately 3 acres from M-1 Light Industrial to PUD Planned Unit Development and a Preliminary
PUD Development Plan for a farm to market retail store. The property is located at the northwest corner of
the intersection of Cedar City Drive and Oil Well Road and is described as Part of the Southwest Quarter of
the Southeast Quarter of Section 9, Township 44 North, Range 11 West, in the City of Jefferson, Callaway
County, Missouri. (Central Missouri Professional Services, Consultant).
Case No. P23002 — 2200 Block of St. Mary's Boulevard, Rezoning from C-2 to RA-2 and Preliminary
Subdivision Plat. Request filed by MATEJO, LLC, property owner, for a rezoning of 9.09 acres from C-2
General Commercial to RA-2 High Density (Multi -Family) Residential and a preliminary subdivision plat
consisting of 25 lots. The property is located northwest of the intersection of St. Mary's Boulevard and
Heisinger Road and is described as Part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 11,
Township 44 North, Range 12 West, in the City of Jefferson, Cole County, Missouri. (Central Missouri
Professional Services, Consultant).
Case No. P23003 — 309 & 311 Bolivar Street, Amendment to PUD Plan. Request filed by Capital
Opportunity Fund LLC, property owner, to amend the approved PUD Planned Unit Development plan to
change the number and orientation of parking spaces located on the north side of the property adjacent to
West Wall Way. The property is located on the northeast corner of the intersection of West McCarty Street
and Bolivar Street and is described as the northerly part of Inlot No. 424, in the City of Jefferson, Cole
County, Missouri.
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required
under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request.
Please call (573) 634-6410 with questions regarding agenda items.
Case No. P23004 — 1000 Block of Marshall St., Final Subdivision Plat of TC3C Subdivision. Request
filed by Zeal Enterprise, LLC, property owner, for a Final Subdivision Plat for 1.88 acres proposing creation
of 10 lots. The property is zoned RS-4 Medium Density Residential and is located on the Marshall Street cul-
de-sac 250 feet north of East Franklin Street and with frontage also on Roland Street and is described as Part
of the Northeast Quarter Section 18, Township 45 North, Range 1 I West, in the City of Jefferson, Cole
County, Missouri. (Central Missouri Professional Services, Consultant).
Other New Business
8. Other Business
A. Staff updates on prior cases
B. Introduction of New Planning and Zoning Members
9. Adjourn
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required
under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request.
Please call (573) 634-6410 with questions regarding agenda items.
Minutes
JEFFERSON CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
December 8, 2022
5:15 p.m.
COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT
Dale Vaughan, Chair
Penny Quigg, Vice Chair
Gregory Butler
Bunnie Trickey Cotten
Emily Fretwell
Shanon Hawk
Hank Vogt
Jacob Robinett, Alternate
Randy Hoselton, Alternate
COMMISSION MEMBERS ABSENT
Treaka Young
Tom Werdenhause, Alternate
COUNCIL LIAISON PRESENT
Michael Lester
STAFF PRESENT
Eric Barron, Planning Manager
Dustin Birch, Associate City Counselor
Kortney Bliss, Planner
Shane Wade, Civil Engineer
Lisa Dittmer, Administrative Assistant
ATTENDANCE RECORD
6of6
6 of 6
3 of 6
6 of 6
5 of 6
6of6
6 of 6
4of6
1 of 1
Guest: Paul Samson with Central Missouri Professional Services.
5 of 6
Oof1
Call to Order and Introduction of Members, Ex-officio Members and Staff
Chair Dale Vaughan called the meeting to order. Six regular members and two
alternates were present. A quorum was present.
Designation of Voting Alternates
The Chair announced that all regular members and alternates present are eligible to
vote.
2. Procedural Matters and Procedures Explained
Ms. Bliss explained the procedures for the meeting. The following documents were
entered as exhibits. Ms. Bliss advised that copies of the exhibits are available through
the City Clerk or the Department of Planning and Protective Services:
The City Code of the City of Jefferson, as amended
Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Map
Copies of applications under consideration
A list of property owners to whom notices were sent
Affidavit of publication of the public notice in the newspaper
Rules of Procedure, Planning & Zoning Commission
Ms. Bliss submitted the following items for the record:
Staff reports
Minutes of proceedings
Copies of drawings, plans, and/or renderings under consideration
Letters or memoranda from staff
Materials submitted by the public or applicants pertaining to the cases under
consideration
3. Adoption of Agenda
Ms. Cotten moved and Ms. Quigg seconded to approve the agenda. The motion passed
8-0 with the following votes:
Aye: Butler, Cotten, Fretwell, Hawk, Hoselton, Quigg, Robinett, and Vogt.
Nay: None
4. Approval of the Regular Meeting Minutes of November 10, 2022.
Ms. Butler moved and Mr. Vogt seconded to approve the regular meeting minutes of
November 10, 2022 as printed. The motion passed 8-0 with the following votes:
Aye: Butler, Cotten, Fretwell, Hawk, Hoselton, Quigg, Robinett, and Vogt.
Nay: None
5. Communications Received
No communication received.
6. New Business/Public Hearing
Case No. P22016 - 900 Block of Emily Lane, Preliminary and Final Plat of Emily
Lane Subdivision Section Three. Request filed by Mark and Julie Gerlach, property
owner, for a Preliminary and Final Subdivision Plat for 3.39 acres consisting of three lots.
The property is zoned RA-1 High Density Residential and is located at the terminus of
Emily Lane and is described as Part of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter
of Section 8, Township 44 North, Range 12 West, in the City of Jefferson, Missouri.
(Central Missouri Professional Services, Consultant).
Ms. Bliss stated the applicant is requesting a preliminary and final subdivision plat for the
900 block of Emily Lane. The property is zoned RA-1 High Density Residential. The
owner plans to divide the 3.39-acre property into three separate lots with each lot having
connection to a proposed cul-de-sac finishing off the current dead end of Emily Lane.
Paul Samson with Central Missouri Professional Services (CMPS), representing
property owner Mark and Julie Gerlach, presented the case. The property owners
purchased the property within the last year and are interested in developing the property
for multi -family residential uses. The property was recently annexed into the city and is
zoned RA-1, which matches the existing part of Emily Lane. CMPS has submitted the
street improvement plans and sanitary sewer extension plans which would allow building
of the cul-de-sac and the sanitary sewer mains that would serve each of the lots. Site
plans will be submitted as construction goes on each lot. Mailboxes will be addressed
during site plans.
Mr. Wade advised there is public infrastructure in the vicinity, Emily Lane is servicing
section one and two of the subdivision currently. Sidewalks exist along one side of Emily
Lane, the street is being proposed to be completed and terminate with a cul-de-sac with
this proposal. The street is a 28-foot-wide street with parking allowed on one side of the
roadway. Stormwater detention, stormwater quality, and erosion/sediment control will be
private and part of the site development. Some clearing activity has occurred on the site,
staff asks that some perimeter fencing, granular construction entrance and any other
erosion control be installed to stabilize the site for the portion that has been cleared. A
land disturbance permit will also need to be completed by the property owner. The
upstream drainage for the existing channel that runs along lot 24 carries over 50 acres of
drainage, staff asks that there is a stream and structure setback for lot 24. Sewer main
and sidewalks are being proposed to be extended to serve all of the lots. Facilities for
street lights, utilities, and fire hydrants are all existing within the current subdivision and
meet city standards.
Ms. Bliss stated that staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat and the
requested final plat with the condition that any technical corrections or comments be
addressed from staff.
Ms. Cotten moved and Ms. Quigg seconded a motion to approve requested preliminary
plat of Emily Lane Subdivision Section Three subject to technical comments and
corrections by city staff.
The motion passed 8-0 with the following votes:
Aye: Butler, Cotten, Fretwell, Hawk, Hoselton, Quigg, Robinett, and Vogt.
Nay: None.
Ms. Cotton moved and Mr. Vogt seconded a motion to recommend approval of
requested final plat of Emily Lane Subdivision Section Three subject to technical
comments and corrections by city staff.
The motion passed 8-0 with the following votes:
Aye: Butler, Cotten, Fretwell, Hawk, Hoselton, Quigg, Robinett, and Vogt.
Nay: None.
7. Other New Business
8. Other Business
A. Staff Updates on Prior Cases
Mr. Barron advised the daycare/coffee shop on Stonehill Road was approved by City
Council as an amendment to the PUD plan. The JC Gymnastics building on Four
Seasons Drive was approved by the City Council for a PUD plan amendment. The
special exception permit for the Algoa Industrial Park Transload Facility was approved
by the City Council.
Mr. Barron gave an update on the Capital Area Active Transportation Plan and reminded
members to complete the survey.
B. New Planning and Zoning Commission Members
Mr. Hoselton introduced himself to the commission.
Mr. Werdenhause was not present.
Adjourn. There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 5:56 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
Lisa Dittmer, Administrative Assistant
Jefferson City
Planning &Zoning Commission
January 12, 2023
Case No. P23001
1010 Cedar City Drive
Jay and Kimberly Fischer
1. Rezoning from M-1 Light Industrial to
PUD Planned Unit Development
2. Preliminary PUD Plan
City of Jefferson Manning 8,, Zonng Comma ssoon
LOCAT DON MAP
47,s�-- - rl_
D YJ
"k
�/ /.. co
!Proposed.Rezoning an
,-u PUD Plan Site Area
SIXTH ST
LEY
RS-4
w
t is
Z
.-0
-- � � �.L O� ' , `
).7 0Sol
U)
---FO.UR-T-H-ST--
Case No. P23001 0 137.5 275 550 Feet N
1110 Cedar City Drive
Rezoning from M-1 to PUD and Preliminary PUD Plan W+ E
S
City of Jefferson Planning and Zoning Commission
VICINITY
o� \
/'�y�Ysi3 0/. �KAT•Y-RD-�
63
hb
l' 22 77O'q
y_ ry � ryy�
>> 63 1
dc
28 7.760,
SIXTH:SAr� ea of Proposed Rezoning and / 26=7761
T �
y Prelimi, aryPUD Pla 1I
LEY S�
�FIFTH
-�S7T
FIOURTH:ST FOURTH=ST
N
THI— RD STL -
0
ca
ro
z
0
o
Case No. P23001 N
1010 Cedar City Drive 0 235 470 940 Feet
Rezoning from M-1 from PUD and Preliminary PUD Plan W r E
S
PLANNING STAFF REPORT
JEFFERSON CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
January 12, 2023
Case No. P23001-1110 Cedar City Drive, Rezoning from M-1 to PUD and Preliminary Planned Unit
Development (PUD) Site Plan. Request filed by Jay and Kimberly Fischer, property owners, for rezoning
of approximately 3 acres from M-1 Light Industrial to PUD Planned Unit Development and a Preliminary
PUD Development Plan for a farm to market retail store. The property is located at the northwest corner of
the intersection of Cedar City Drive and Oil Well Road and is described as Part of the Southwest Quarter
of the Southeast Quarter of Section 9, Township 44 North, Range 11 West, in the City of Jefferson,
Callaway County, Missouri. (Central Missouri Professional Services, Consultant).
Nature of Request
A request was filed by the property owners to rezone a section of property from M-1 Light Industrial to
PUD Planned Unit Development. The applicants also request a Preliminary PUD Plan for a 2880 square
foot retail farm to market store. Both portions of the request would occur on a portion of the property
approximately 3 acres. This proposal does occur on two separate parcels owned by the applicants. The
applicants have expressed within their PUD Plan narrative a proposed intent to divide this 3 acre piece off
from the two parcels at a later date.
Review and Approval Process
Processing of Preliminary PUD Plans occur with respect to the City Code.. The role of the Planning and
Zoning Commission is to review applications for Preliminary PUD Plans and make a recommendation to
the City Council. The City Council is then to make a determination concerning the approval of such request.
Zoning History
The subject location has been involved in a few Planning and Zoning Commission cases. In 1988, the
northern parcel was rezoned from RU to M-1. The southern parcel was rezoned to M-1 Light Industrial
in 1989.
Zoning and Surrounding Land Use:
Current Zoning: M-1 Current Use: Open Land, Agricultural
Requested Zoning: PUD Intended Use: Retail Farm to Market Store
Surrounding Zoning
Surrounding Uses
North
M-1
Open Land
South
M-1, RS-4, and C-2
Agricultural and Recreational
East
M-1
Open Land, Industrial
West
M-1
Agricultural, Open Land, Unincorporated
Review Criteria for Rezoning:
Section 35-74 B.4, lists review criteria for consideration of an amendment to the zoning ordinance text and
zoning map. This case involves an amendment to the zoning map. The applicant has provided written
responses to the review criteria for a rezoning. See attached application materials. City staff have also
provided responses to the review criteria in the next section.
Planning and Zoning Commission
Case No. P23001
Staff Analysis of Rezoning Proposal:
January, 12 2023
Page 2
Standard checklist for rezoning:
Yes
No
Notes:
The existing zoning was in error at the time of
X
The M-1 Light Industrial zoning
adoption.
designation was established nearly
30 years and development has not
occurred.
There has been a change in character in the area
X
Flooding of the Missouri River at
due to installation of public facilities, other zone
different times in the 1900s,
changes, new growth trends, neighborhood
including in 1993resulted in
deterioration, or development transitions.
dynamic changes in the
development in the area was known
as Cedar City. The proposed use
would be similar to uses in the area.
There is a community need for the proposed
X
The proposed rezoning to PUD and
rezoning.
related PUD Plan involves a retail
farm to market store. This would
add potential economic and tourist
value to the community.
The proposed change is consistent with, and in
X
The rezoning and related PUD Plan
furtherance of, the implementation of the goals and
appear to meet the requirements put
policies of the comprehensive plan, other adopted
forth by the Zoning Ordinance and,
plans, and the policies, intents and requirements of
further the proposal is subject to all
this ordinance and other City regulations and
applicable requirements and
guidelines
regulations. The proposed rezoning
and use would be compatible with
the area.
The proposed zoning is compatible with the zoning
X
There are surrounding agricultural
and uses of property nearby.
land uses. PUD zoning has
potential to be flexible in permitted
uses on the site.
Public and community facilities, which may
X
Existing roadways do exist in the
include, but are not limited to, sanitary and storm
area that can provide access to
sewers, water, electrical service, police and fire
several community facilities.
protection, schools, parks and recreation facilities,
Specifications of the site with
roads, libraries, and solid waste collection and
respect to connection to all required
disposal, are available and adequate to serve uses
utilities and compliance with all
authorized under the proposed zoning.
City Code requirements will be
reviewed by each respective
Departmental staff.
Planning and Zoning Commission
Case No. P23001
January, 12 2023
Page 3
Standard checklist for rezoning:
Yes
No
Notes:
Authorized uses shall not adversely affect the
X
The use is anticipated to produce
capacity or safety of the street network in the
low traffic flow. Thus, the nearby
vicinity of the property.
road network should have the
capacity in order to facilitate the
uses traffic volume.
Potential environmental impacts (e.g., excessive
X
Potential environmental impacts of
storm water runoff, water pollution, air pollution,
the site have and will further be
noise pollution, excessive lighting, or other
reviewed by city staff with respect
environmental harms) of authorized uses shall be
to the City Code. The site would
mitigated.
need to be elevated out of the
floodplain and obtain a floodplain
permit from the City of Jefferson.
There is an adequate supply of land available in the
X
The portion of the property
subject area and the surrounding community to
proposed to contain both the
accommodate the zoning and community needs.
rezoning and PUD Plan should be
adequate and able to accommodate
zoning and community needs.
Benefits shall be derived by the community or area
X
Rezoning of the subject site would
proposed to be rezoned
provide a proposed use which has
the potential to benefit the
community with its specialized
business model and capacity to
serve both community members
and tourists alike.
Staff Analysis of Preliminary PUD Plan
Building design: In accordance with information provided by the applicants, the main 2880 square foot
structure would face the intersection and would contain timber and metal detailing to resemble a rustic barn.
The building would contain retail floor area, freezer space, and restrooms. Other accessory structures such
as a greenhouse are proposed to be constructed at a later date.
Permitted Uses: The Preliminary PUD Plan outlines use of the property as retail farm to market store. The
narrative specifies a request for and Planning and Zoning Division staff recommend establishment of an
underlying zoning of C-1 Neighborhood Commercial for the purpose of determining future regulatory
details regarding items such as permitted uses, signage, and lighting.
aiML Applicants have stated that signage would be building mounted signs in the front as well as back of
building. Any future signage would need to conform to the requirements outlined for the C-1 zoning district.
Leg_ Proposed lighting would be building mounted lighting.
Landscaping: Instead of parking lot landscaping, various vegetation types such as produce trees located
adjacent to the parking lot and along the adjacent streets are proposed on the site plan.
Parking: A gravel lot is proposed. This would be a deviation from Section 35-58. B.6 regarding parking
lot paving.
Driveway Two paved driveways conforming to City requirements are proposed with one driveway
connecting to Cedar City Drive and the other to Oil Well Road.
Traffic: The proposal does not exceed 100 peak hour vehicle trips and therefore does not trigger the
requirement for a site specific traffic study.
Planning and Zoning Commission
Case No. P23001
January, 12 2023
Page 4
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommend approval of the proposed rezoning and Preliminary PUD Plan. The rezoning from M-1
Light Industrial to PUD Planned Unit Development allows for the requested land use of retail farm to
market store. Such use is compatible with surrounding land uses. The PUD Plan must comply with all
applicable City Code requirements.
Form of Motion
1. Motion to recommend approval to the City Council the request to rezone the property from M-1 to
PUD.
2. Motion to recommend approval to the City Council of the requested Preliminary PUD Plan for a
retail farm to market store with the following condition:
The establishment of the C-1 Neighborhood Commercial underlying zoning designation
for purposes of determining future permitted uses and requirements for signage, lighting,
and other applicable site features.
City of Jefferson
Department of Planning & Protective
Services 320 E. McCarty Street
Jefferson City, MO 65101
Phone: 573-634-6410
JCPlannina(a)ieffersoncitymo.gov
www.jeffersoncitymo.gov
APPLICATION FOR ZONING AMENDMENTS
1. The undersigned hereby petitions the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council of the City of
Jefferson, Missouri, for the following amendment to the Zoning Code:
Map Amendment Text Amendment (Include description of proposed text amendment)
Property Address: 1 1 1 0 Cedar City Drive
2. Applications for Map amendments shall include a location map and legal description.
3. This petition requests to rezone the above described real estate from its present classification of M-1
district to P U D district. The purpose of this rezoning request is to:
Accommodate Farm to Market retail store.
4. Filing fee: Map Amendment = $650. Text Amendment = $450.
5. Required Findings: Applicant responses to the required findings shall be noted in Addendum A and vary
based on type of request.
6. The undersigned certify to be all of the owner(s) of the above described property and that the
submitted information (including all attachments to this application) is true and correct. (All owners
of this propert must si n and the signatures must be notarized).
Jay Fischer
Prc,66rty Owner Signature Printed Name/Title (type or print)
kxnt-�- I A,%a-W7L- Kimberly Fischer
P operty Own r Signature Printed NamelTitle (type or print)
L)
this day of O ('C16CL/�—
KIMM L BLAND
Notary Public, Notary Seal
State of Missouri � � }
Cole County � A, �) )-ll �L J(i
Commission d; 21 755109 Notary Public
My Commission Expires 03-08-2025
For City Use Only:
(Revised July 1, 2018)
Application Filing Fee: Map Amendment = $650 ($450 + $200 Advertising Fee)
Text Amendment = $450 ($250 + $200 Advertising Fee)
Application Fill n Fee Received: Cash (receipt # ) Check (copy; check # )
Attachments: Ll Addendum A OMap ELApplicant/Project Information Sheet
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the
Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request.
Page 1 of 6
Jefferson City Zoning Amendment Application
Addendum A — Review Criteria
To be used to support zoning amendment requests.
(Section 35-74.B.4)
Property Address 1110 Cedar City Drive
Applicant Name Jay and Kimberly Fischer
Provide responses to the following required findings by selecting all criteria that apply to your request. State all
reasons for your answer and use additional pages to complete your answer if necessary.
A. The existing zoning was in error at the time of adoption. Explain.
The purpose of the rezoning request is to allow for a retail farm to market store within a PUD
plan framework.
B. There has been a change in character in the area due to installation of public facilities, other zone changes, new
growth trends, neighborhood deterioration, or development transitions. Explain the change and be specific on which
public facilities, other zone changes, new growth trends, neighborhood deterioration, or development transitions that
effected the change.
No, the area is somewhat rural in nature.
C. There is a community need for the proposed rezoning.
(i.) What will the proposed zoning be?
PUD
(fi.) Why does the community need this zoning?
A small retail farm to market store would be a unique addition for the city.
D. The proposed change is consistent with, and in furtherance of, the implementation of the goals and policies of the
Comprehensive Plan, other adopted plans, and the policies, intents and requirements of this Ordinance and other
City regulations and guidelines.
Old Cedar City is a mix of industrial and recreational uses. A small retail farm to market store
would be a unique destination for the area.
Page 2 of 6
E. The proposed zoning is compatible with the zoning and uses of property nearby.
Property North - Agricultural Property South - Recreational
Property East - Industrial Property West - Agricultural
F. Public and community facilities, which may include, but are not limited to, sanitary and storm sewers, water,
electrical service, police and fire protection, schools, parks and recreation facilities, roads, libraries, and solid waste
collection and disposal, are available and adequate to serve uses authorized under the proposed zoning. List public
and community facilities available on the site.
All necessary utilities and services are suitable for the proposed building.
G. A traffic impact analysis has been provided to indicate the potential number of new trips generated and provisions
are provided to mitigate impacts of high traffic -generating projects. (See Section 35-60.Traffic Impact Analysis
regarding vehicle trip thresholds and traffic impact analysis requirements)
A traffic impact analysis is not required. The use would be low traffic.
H. Authorized uses shall not adversely affect the capacity or safety of the street network in the vicinity of the property.
(i.) Describe the proposed use.
Retail
(if.) Will the proposed use adversely affect the capacity or safety of the street network in the vicinity of the
property? Why/why not?
No, suitable driveways and traffic circulation would be installed.
I. Potential environmental impacts (e.g., excessive storm water runoff, water pollution, air pollution, noise pollution,
excessive lighting, or other environmental harms) of authorized uses shall be mitigated. List any potential
environmental impacts and how they will be mitigated.
The site development would comply with all necessary requirements.
J. There is an adequate supply of land available in the subject area and the surrounding community to accommodate
the zoning and community needs.
This would be a unique retail outlet in an agricultural setting.
K. Benefits shall be derived by the community or area proposed to be rezoned. List the benefits of the proposed
rezoning.
The community would benefit from the unique retail destination.
Page 3 of 6
City of Jefferson
Department of Planning & Protective Services
320 E. McCarty Street
Jefferson City, MO 65101
Phone: 573-634-6410
JCPlanning(a)ieffersoncitymo.gov
www.jeffersoncitymo.gov
APPLICATION FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD)
❑Concept PUD Plan ❑ Amendment to Final PUD Plan
® Preliminary PUD Plan ❑ Amendment to Final PUD Plan for Signage
❑ Final PUD Plan
PUD Project Name: ► ` 5cks-c -Fa ciry\ MC-C61 StreetAddress: W b Cedar C t+\4^D Kt ve,
Legal Description: (as follows or is attached) <See C14ac-61d
Please attach or include the following:
a) Typed project narrative describing the type and character of the development, including land uses, acreage,
proposed residential densities or commercial floor area (FAR); public or private open space, amenities or
recreation areas to be provided; sidewalks and pedestrian ways; parking areas; deviations from minimum
design standards of Section 35-51; and other information required by Section 35-74 or applicable sections
of the Zoning Code. The project title and location must be included upon every page. Number all pages and
attachments.
b) Site Plan and/or Development Plan, as applicable.
c) Preliminary or Final Subdivision Plat or Declaration of Condominium Association, as applicable;
d) Draft of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions, as applicable;
e) Traffic impact analysis, if required by Section 35-60;
f) Signage Plan, including type, locations and dimensions of all proposed signs;
g) Landscaping and Screening Plan;
h) Lighting Plan, including pole heights, type of fixtures or luminaries, and foot candles;
i) Project Phasing Plan (if applicable)
j) Application Filing Fee = $500 + $200 advertising fee + $20 per acre + $250 rezoning fee (if applicable)
(Revised July 1, 2018)
Application Information:
Property Owner: ::�oog mbeC ly
Address i qt7!F-i Me- n nc-+. Ze-1 q;;4 'o..-
Phone Number(s): 5-17 3
Applicant Name (if different from owner):
Address
Phone Number(s):
Consulta
Address:
Phone N
The atta ed inf ation accurately represents this proposed project
I-
P perty Owner Signature Printed Name/Title Date
Consultant Signature
Printed Name/Title
Date
For Staff Use Only: Application Filing Fee Received Amount OCheck #
Attachments: Narrative,D Site Plan Applicant/Project Information Sheet -Note other information submitted on back page
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the
Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request.
Pagel of 7
PUD Narrative
Fischer Farm Market
Preliminary PUD Plan
1120 Cedar City Drive
12-19-22
Fischer Farms is planning to place a retail farm to market store on the corner of Oil Well Road and Cedar
City Drive. The store would consist of a 2880 square foot building and is planned to focus on sale of
agricultural produce and made in Missouri products. The exterior of the building would be a mixture of
metal and timber resembling a rustic barn.
The building would face the intersection, and would include retail floor area, freezer space, and
restroom. A gravel parking lot is planned with driveway entrances off of both streets. Seasonal display
of items outdoors is planned. A future greenhouse and other accessory structures are planned to be
constructed on site. In lieu of standard parking lot landscaping trees, produce trees (such as apple trees)
or other agricultural plantings are planned. The parking area is planned to be gravel, with driveway
connections to both roads paved per city driveway standards.
Although the purpose of this application and building is for a farm to market style retail store. We
would request an underlying zoning of C-1 Commercial for the purpose of determining future permitted
land uses.
Signage for the operation will consist of building mounted signs on the front and back. Any future
signage would adhere to the allowances of the C-1 zoning district.
Exterior lighting would consist of building mounted lights.
The property is planned to be divided off from the remainder of the 25 acre farm at a future date.
Area proposed for PUD rezoning is 350' square located at the corner of Cedar City Drive and Oil Well
Road.
Filing Fee: Rezoning Fee
250
PUD Plan
500
Advertising Fee
200
TOTAL
$950
uj
r-
N
BLE
j
a
a w
i
o z
id
r
51
Q:
I
— W
i
N I
N
O
SUl
W
n 3
m4 a _J
•�i
o
� i
I
I
i
I
°
o
i
i
i
ro LU
>
3Q
'
I
U1
� O
J
H
a a ®r'
SSD21�J .IZJ.br13 ,qL �
Jay & Kim Fischer
Rezoning Description
M-1 to PUD
Part of a tract of land described in Book M449, page 961 Callaway County Recorder's Office, being part
of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 9, Township 44 North, Range 11 West, in
the City of Jefferson, Callaway County, Missouri, more particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point on the northeasterly right of way line of Cedar City Drive (known formerly as
Route 63, or Route 7), said point being located 50.00 feet left of said Cedar City Drive at Sta. 266+70.00,
as per the Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission Plans of Job No. 5-P-63-20B; thence along
said Highway plan right of way line, and along the boundary of said property described in Book M449,
page 961 the following courses: S78'54'25"E, 134.58 feet, to a point 40.00 feet right of Oilwell Road
(Service Road Connector per Highway Plans), Sta. 21+50; thence N56°04'11"E, along the northwesterly
right of way of said Oilwell Road, 255.04 feet; thence leaving said Oilwell Road right of way line and the
boundary of said property described in Book M449, page 961, N33°57'08"W, 350.00 feet; thence
S56-06'23"W, 350.00 feet to a point on the northeasterly right of way line of said Cedar City Drive and
the boundary of said property described in Book M449, page 961; thence along the northeasterly right
of way line of said Cedar City Drive, and the boundary of said property described in Book M449, page
961, the following courses: on a curve to the right, having a radius of 1196.30 feet, an arc distance of
17.83 feet (the chord of said curve being S34°19'14"E, 17.83 feet) to a point 50.00 feet left of PT Sta.
264+42.40 as per Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission Plans of Job No. MO-269A; thence
S33°53'37"E, 237.20 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
City of Jefferson
Department of Planning & Protective Services
320 E. McCarty St.
Jefferson City, MO 65101
December 27, 2022
Dear Property Owner:
Carrie Temin, Mayor
Sonny Sanders, AICP, Director
Phone: 573-634-6410
Fax: 573-634-6457
This letter is to notify you that the Jefferson City Planning and Zoning Commission will meet at 5:15 p.m.
on Thursday, January 12, 2023 in the Council Chambers of the John G. Christy Municipal Building, 320
East McCarty Street to consider the following matters (see map on back):
Case No. P23001 —1110 Cedar City Drive, Rezoning from M-1 to PUD and Preliminary Planned Unit
Development (PUD) Site Plan. Request filed by Jay and Kimberly Fischer, property owners, for rezoning
of approximately 3 acres from M-1 Light Industrial to PUD Planned Unit Development and a Preliminary
PUD Development Plan for a farm to market retail store. The property is located at the northwest corner of
the intersection of Cedar City Drive and Oil Well Road and is described as Part of the Southwest Quarter
of the Southeast Quarter of Section 9, Township 44 North, Range 11 West, in the City of Jefferson, Callaway
County, Missouri. (Central Missouri Professional Services, Consultant).
As a nearby landowner and/or neighbor, you are being provided notice of this hearing. Unfortunately, we
are unable to record comments received by telephone, however, written comments may be directed to the
Planning and Zoning Commission in one of the following ways:
e-mail: JCPlanning@jeffersoncitymo.gov
fax: Dept. of Planning and Protective Services / Planning Division 573-634-6457
mail: Dept. of Planning and Protective Services / Planning Division
John G. Christy Municipal Building, 320 E. McCarty Street Jefferson City, MO 65101
Written comments received on or before 1:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting will be made a part of the
official record and copied and distributed to Commission members at the meeting. Those unable to provide
written comments in advance are invited to deliver their comments to the Commission Chairman only at the
meeting. Correspondence received after 1:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting will be included in the official
record, but there is no guarantee that copies will be made for distribution to all Commission members.
For your information, this case is tentatively scheduled for a public hearing in front of the City Council on
February 20, 2023. The City Council meets at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the John G. Christy
Municipal Building, 320 East McCarty Street.
Information regarding this case may be viewed on the Planning and Zoning Commission webpage at:
https://www.meffersoncitVmo.gov/government/pIanning/planning and zoning commission php
Please contact the Planning and Zoning Division via phone at 573.634.6573 with pertinent questions.
Best Regards,
Kortney Bliss
Planner 1
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats
as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request.
Please call (573) 634-6410 with questions regarding agenda items.
Case No. P23001
1110 Cedar City Drive
Rezoning from M-1 to PUD and Preliminary PUD Plan
185 ft. Notification Buffer
ti
_W
J
'Cr
—FIFTH ST LL
IF0
0
0
0
O
�: [E[[IT
O
F-
0
U
11,
N
W ® E
S
0 70 140 280 420 560
Feet
H�,Y63 O��w�CC RQ_
\Y 63
FI-
Jefferson City Planning and Zoning Commission
Property Owner list
Case No. P23001 1110 Cedar City Drive 12/28/22
KORTE SALES LLC
1129 Cedar City Dr.
JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101
CARTER, GEORGE D. & BARBARAJ
1010 SANDSTONE ST. ST.
JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101
JEFFERSON HAULING & DISTRIBUTING CO
1020 CEDAR CITY DR.
JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101
Jefferson City
Planning &Zoning Commission
January 12, 2023
Case No. P23002
2200 Block of St. Mary's Boulevard
MATEJO, LLC
1. Rezoning from C-2 General
Commercial to RA-2 High Density
Residential
2. Preliminary Subdivision Plat
Doty of Jefferson Nannong l Zonong Commissuon
LOCATT ON MAP
'
M-2
• ♦ 'e.• j(! . I I Ill ,
Tn .;TZ '`- .�•� : 1:' *•• ^'k3 �,+. � dX •RTA`n i La.�`y,.� +.:Fy. r. '1 - r,.� � �.rt. r �ti r ti��.
2285..40
z r 1 ' rP
1•
Nk
l �
k.
r C-2 R
J
-- - I�tl� �•11
r —
"�?
fr.
_ ._ SOURd•BL-VD - - __
Case No. P23002 0 120 240 480 Feet
2200 Block of St. Mary's Boulevard
Rezoning from C-2 to RA-2 and Preliminary Subdivision Plat
N
W ; E
S
City of Jefferson Planning and Zoning Commission
MISSOURI
X
VICINITY
Case No. P23002
2200 Block of St. Mary's Boulevard 0 230 460 920 Feet
Rezoning from C-2 to RA-2 and Preliminary Subdivision Plat
N
W r E
S
PLANNING STAFF REPORT
JEFFERSON CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
January 12, 2023
Case No. P23002 — 2200 Block of St. Mary's Boulevard, Rezoning from C-2 to RA-2 and Preliminary
Subdivision Plat. Request filed by MATEJO, LLC, property owner, for a rezoning of 9.09 acres from C-2
General Commercial to RA-2 High Density (Multi -Family) Residential and a preliminary subdivision plat
consisting of 25 lots. The property is located northwest of the intersection of St. Mary's Boulevard and
Heisinger Road and is described as Part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 11,
Township 44 North, Range 12 West, in the City of Jefferson, Cole County, Missouri. (Central Missouri
Professional Services, Consultant).
Nature of Request
A request was filed for both a zoning map amendment and preliminary plat for a parcel having 9.09 acres.
The parcel is located along the 2200 Block of St. Mary's Boulevard and is currently zoned C-2 General
Commercial. The owner desires to rezone this property from C-2 General Commercial to RA-2 High
Density (Multi -Family) Residential; matching the zoning designation of the property to the east. A
preliminary plat consisting of 25 lots was submitted by the applicant. The plat and other application
materials suggest the proposed land use to be duplexes.
Review and Approval Process:
In accordance with the City Code, rezoning requests are reviewed by the Planning and Zoning
Commission. The Planning and Zoning Commission makes a recommendation to the City Council and
City Council comes to a final decision.
The Planning and Zoning Commission are the entity responsible for reviewing and coming to a final
decision concerning preliminary plat proposals.
Zoning History
The Planning and Zoning Commission did have one prior case involving the property as part of the
current request in addition to some property adjacent west. The case occurred in 1984 and was an
application for a rezoning from RA-2 to C-2. Documentation from the case file suggests that the applicant
of the case desired to rezone the property for the ability to make the property more suitable for
development with respect to factors such as character of the area and terrain of the property.
Zoning And Surrounding Land Use
Current Zoning: C-2 Current Use: Undeveloped
Requested Zoning: RA-2 Intended Use: Duplex/Multi Familv Development
Surrounding Zoning
Surrounding Uses
North
M-2
Highway 50
South
C-2
Office, Parkin
East
RA-2
Multi Family Residential
West
C-2
Distribution Business
Allowed Uses-
Permitted uses within the RA-2 zoning district include single family, duplexes, multi -family buildings
including large apartments, and assisted living facilities.
Review Criteria for Rezoning:
Section 35-74 B.4, lists review criteria for consideration of an amendment to the zoning ordinance text and
zoning map. This case involves an amendment to the zoning map. The applicant has provided written
responses to the review criteria for a rezoning. See attached application materials. City staff have also
provided responses to the review criteria in the next section.
Staff Analvsis of Rezoning Proposal:
Standard checklist for rezoning:
Yes
No
Notes:
The existing zoning was in error at the time of
X
The Future Land Use Map of the
adoption.
Comprehensive Plan calls out the
area to be used for suburban mixed
use which includes multi -family
uses.
There has been a change in character in the area
X
The area to the east has developed
due to installation of public facilities, other zone
primarily in a multi -family manner.
changes, new growth trends, neighborhood
deterioration, or development transitions.
There is a community need for the proposed
X
The proposed rezoning would
rezoning.
establish a zoning designation
suitable for and which would allow
the addition of multi family housing
options in the city.
The proposed change is consistent with, and in
X
The proposed rezoning would
furtherance of, the implementation of the goals and
conform to the standards of the
policies of the comprehensive plan, other adopted
Zoning Code and aligns with the
plans, and the policies, intents and requirements of
goals and objectives of the adopted
this ordinance and other City regulations and
comprehensive plan.
guidelines
The proposed zoning is compatible with the zoning
X
The rezoning and proposed land use
and uses of property nearby.
is compatible with multi -family
uses to the east.
Standard checklist for rezoning:
Yes
No
Notes:
Public and community facilities, which may
X
Existing facilities and services exist
include, but are not limited to, sanitary and storm
in the vicinity.
sewers, water, electrical service, police and fire
protection, schools, parks and recreation facilities,
roads, libraries, and solid waste collection and
disposal, are available and adequate to serve uses
authorized under the proposed zoning.
Authorized uses shall not adversely affect the
X
The nearby road network and
capacity or safety of the street network in the
proposed roadway should have the
vicinity of the property.
capacity in order to facilitate the
use's traffic impacts.
Potential environmental impacts (e.g., excessive
X
Potential environmental impacts of
storm water runoff, water pollution, air pollution,
the site have and will further be
noise pollution, excessive lighting, or other
reviewed by city staff with respect
environmental harms) of authorized uses shall be
to the City Code.
mitigated.
There is an adequate supply of land available in the
X
The property to be rezoned should
subject area and the surrounding community to
be adequate and able to
accommodate the zoning and community needs.
accommodate zoning and
community needs. There is a need
for more multi -family property in
the community.
Benefits shall be derived by the community or area
X
Rezoning of the subject site would
proposed to be rezoned
provide a proposed use which has
the potential to benefit the
community with an increase in
availabie of multi famil housin .
Preliminary Plat
The preliminary subdivision plat is subject to and receives review with respect to City Code requirements
laid out in Chapter 33 The Subdivision Code and Chapter 35 Zoning Code. A rezoning approval to a RA-2
designation requires the subdivision to comply with density and dimensional standards of that particular
district. This includes lot size and width specifications.
Proposed Subdivision Name: St. Marys Circle Subdivision
Acreage: The total size of the subdivision is 9.09 acres.
Number of Lots: 25 lots are shown on the Final Plat.
Lot Sizes: According to the final subdivision plat submitted by the applicant, lot size as well as shape
will vary with lot 6 being the largest at 0.62 acre and lots 17, 18, 19, 22, 23, and 24 being the smallest
at 0.20 acres.
Mail Service: Means of mail service for the subdivision appear to not be yet determined. This can be
determined at a later date. It is likely that the subdivision will be served by cluster boxes
Sidewalks: Sidewalks are proposed for the frontage along St. Mary's Boulevard and one side of the
proposed roadway.
Parking: The proposed street width would support parking on one side of the street. Parking is typically
permitted on the same side as the sidewalk in residential subdivisions.
Streets: A new roadway named St. Marys Circle is proposed. The right-of-way is shown as 60' and the
road itself being 28' in width. Such roadway would need to conform to all applicable city standards.
Traffic: A traffic impact analysis is not triggered for the proposed 25 duplex development. The Zoning
Code requires a traffic impact analysis for 50 duplexes or more.
Utilities: Fire hydrants, street lights, water, sewer, gas, electric, and etc. are shown on the plan and are
subject to review and comments from staff both in the preliminary and final phases of the plat.
Staff Recommendation
Rezoning from C-2 General Commercial to RA-2 in addition to the proposed multi family use is suitable
and compatible with uses in the area and is in conformance with the future land use plan in the
Comprehensive Plan. The rezoning would increase the multi family housing within the City of Jefferson.
Subject to the technical comments of city staff, the preliminary subdivision plat appears to meet applicable
requirements of the City Code.
Form of Motion
1. Motion to recommend approval to City Council of the proposed rezoning from C-2 General
Commercial to RA-2 High Density Residential.
2. Motion to approve the Preliminary Subdivision Plat of St. Marys Circle Subdivision with
the following conditions:
a. Address technical comments of city staff.
Jefferson City Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting
Engineering Division Staff Report
Thursday, January 12, 2023, 5:15pm
Item 6. — New Business/ Public Hearings
Case No. P23002 — Preliminary Subdivision Plat, St. Mary's Circle Subdivision, 2200 Block of St.
Mary's Blvd. (Existing RA-2 Zoning)
ENGINEERING STAFF RECOMMENDATION -
Recommend approval, subject to technical corrections being addressed on documents prior to the final plat
being submitted for consideration.
Existing Infrastructure Summary
• Public infrastructure exists along St. Mary's Blvd.
• Storm water facilities exist in the vicinity.
• Sanitary sewer facilities exist in the vicinity.
• Sidewalk does not exist in the vicinity.
Improvements Summary
Roadway
• St. Mary's Circle is proposed as a local street serving 25 two (2) unit lots.
• The street is proposed as a 28' wide street, no parking to be allowed on one (1) side of the
roadway.
Storm Water / Erosion Control
• A storm water detention/ storm water quality basin will be located at the northeast corner of the
subdivision.
• A proposed drainage system will collect all drainage from the subdivision and direct it to the basin
indicated.
• An erosion and sediment control plan has will be needed as a part of future infrastructure plans.
• See the enclosed email regarding specific comments needing addressed on the preliminary plat
regarding these facilities.
Sanitary Sewer
• All proposed lots in this development are to be served by a new sanitary sewer main extension that
ties to the existing main at the northeast portion of the subdivision.
Sidewalk
• Sidewalk is proposed along one (1) side of St. Mary's s Circle. Sidewalk is proposed along the
frontage of St. Mary's Blvd.
• p.2
Fire Hydrants / Street Lights/ Utilities
• Facilities proposed within the subdivision are in accordance with City standards.
• See the enclosed email regarding specific comments needing addressed on the preliminary plat
regarding these facilities.
Review Status of Documents -
The preliminary plat has been reviewed and, with the items listed on the attached email being
addressed on the plat by the consultant, will be in generally in good order.
• These review comments referenced on the attached email have been sent back to the consultant for
consideration, and will need to be addressed prior to Planning and Zoning approval.
Wade, Shane
From:
Wade, Shane
Sent:
Thursday, January 5, 2023 12:41 PM
To:
Paul Samson
Cc:
Barron, Eric; Bliss, Kortney; Bonnot, Len
Subject:
Preliminary Plat for Joe Schepper's Property, 2200 Block St. Mary's Blvd.- "To be
determined"- Planning and Engineering Review Comments
Hi Paul -
Please find below, our list of initial review comments for the preliminary plat, per our internal meeting/ review we had
yesterday.
After you have had a chance to look over the items, we (Eric, Cortney and 1) would like to have a phone call with you to
discuss in further detail.
Items are as follows-
1. The storm water detention/ water quality basin, as discussed during our pre -meeting, needs to be maintained
by the City.
It will need to be placed on a Reserved Tract for the City of Jefferson to maintain in the future, not a Lot to be
developed for the subdivision.
The Tract should have enough street frontage to allow for an all weather access driveway to be placed on the
tract, similar to ones that you have proposed previously for other residential subdivisions within the City Limits.
All of this should be shown/ identified on the preliminary plat.
How does the drainage system drain into the basin? (It looks as if it is directed directly to MoDOT r/w.
Will the street drainage/ eastern most draw from St. Mary's Blvd. also drain into this basin?
What are the approximate limits/ general area of the basin at this location?
DI-3 and DI-4 are shown as junction boxes on the plan, but area inlets with drainage area and flow noted in the
drainage calculations. Please clarify.
These items should be addressed, shown/ identified on the preliminary plat.
Where will mail service be provided for the subdivision? (The Reserved Tract for the storm water basin could be
an option).
4. Adequate sight distance should be identified at the two (2) street intersections with St. Mary's Blvd., both to the
west and to the east from each intersection.
5. Driveway access restriction to St. Mary's Blvd. from Lot 1, 15, 16 and 25 should be noted, as access is indicated
from the newly proposed street for each of these lots.
The north side of St. Mary's Blvd. is currently signed as no parking. This should be noted on the plat.
Street lights will be needed at the intersections of the new street with St. Mary's Blvd.
It appears that that power poles will need to be relocated at these locations.
The new power pole locations (if known) as well as intersection street lights will need to be shown on the plat.
7. Slope(s) of the proposed street should be identified on the plan.
8. A drainage area map should be provided for the drainage calculations shown.
9. The name of the street should be identified.
10. The name of the subdivision should be identified.
11. Is there a reason that there is a drainage easement exists between lots 16, 17, 18, 23,24 and 25? No drainage
system is proposed in this area.
We shall be in touch here in a little while.
Thanks.
Shane
Shane Wade, PE
Plan Review and Development Engineer
City of Jefferson Dept. of Public Works
Engineering Division
573.634.6449 O
573.634.6457 F
swade(@ieffersoncitymo.gov
City of Jefferson
Department of Planning & Protective Services
320 E. McCarty Street
Jefferson City, MO 65101
Phone: 573-634-6410
jco1anningrcDieffcit vmo. oro
www.jeffersoncitymo.gov
APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION PLAT
The undersigned hereby petitions the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council of the City of Jefferson,
Missouri for the following type of subdivision: X Preliminary Plat Final Plat
1. Name of Subdivision: TBD Subdivision
2. General location: 2200 Block of St. Marv's Blvd.
3. Existing/Proposed zoning: Existing: C-2 Proposed RA-2
4. Existing/Proposed use of the property: Existing: Vacant Proposed: Residential Duplex/apartment
5. Size of the property in acres:
9.09 Acres
6. Total number of lots proposed: 25 Lots
7. Description of any variances to the Subdivision Regulations being requested (please note section number
of the regulation below and attach a letter stating justification for the variance(s):
No Variances are proposed
8. Application filing fee: $ 625.00 Preliminary Plat = $500 + $5 per lot
Final Plat = $350 + $5 per lot
(Revised July 1, 2018)
9. Signatures:
Joe Scheppers
Rroperty Owner Name (type or print)
Paul Samson, PE
Engineer Name (type or print)
Date
Property Owner Signatu
Si
Minor Revision = $250 + $5 per lot
to Preliminary Plat
Date
J. Brian Rockwell ,f/%/�
Surveyor Name (type or print) -Survey-or Signature Date
Contact person for this application:
Name: Paul Samson,PE - CMPS Address: 2500 E. McCarty St. Jefferson City, MO 65101
Phone Number: 573-634-3455 Email: psamson@cmps-inc.com
For Staff Use Only:
Attachments: — Variance request letter Additional documentation
Notes.
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required underthe Americans
with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request.
Page 1 of 5
City of Jefferson
Department of Planning & Protective
Services 320 E. McCarty Street
Jefferson City, MO 65101
Phone: 573-634-6410
JCPlanninv(a)ieffersoncitymo. clov
www.jeffersoncitymo.gov
APPLICATION FOR ZONING AMENDMENTS
The undersigned hereby petitions the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council of the City of
Jefferson, Missouri, for the following amendment to the Zoning Code:
RV Map Amendment Text Amendment (Include description of proposed text amendment)
Property Address: 2200 St. Mary's Blvd. Jefferson City, MO
2. Applications for Map amendments shall include a location map and legal description.
3. This petition requests to rezone the above described real estate from its present classification of C_2
district to RA-2 district. The purpose of this rezoning request is to:
Build an Apartment/Duplex Subdivision
4. Filing fee: Map Amendment = $650. Text Amendment = $450.
5. Required Findings: Applicant responses to the required findings shall be noted in Addendum A and vary
based on type of request.
6. The undersigned certify to be all of the owner(s) of the above described property and that the
submitted information (including all attachments to this application) is true and correct. (All own
rs
of this erty t sign and the signatures must be notarized).
o
Joe Scheppers/Owner
¢�- MM
Property Owner Signature Printed Name/Title (type or print)
0 � o�
O mU mW--
WZU)UN 23
Property Owner Signature Printed Name/Title (type or print)
}.ALL cut
>>¢z0 C
> > LLJ O "c
fifi f
Subscribed and sworn before me this 13� day of ble C�P� h Zd Z Z
�U �
(15 F
�0 Uot
U
T
'Notary Public
For City Use Only: (Revised July 1, 2018)
Application Filing Fee: Map Amendment = $650 ($450 + $200 Advertising Fee)
Text Amendment = $450 ($250 + $200 Advertising Fee)
Application Filin Fee Received: Cash (receipt # ) =Check (copy; check # )
Attachments: Addendum A 11 Map ElApplicant/Project Information Sheet
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or altemative formats as required under the
Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request.
Page 1 of 6
Jefferson City Zoning Amendment Application
Addendum A — Review Criteria
To be used to support zoning amendment requests.
(Section 35-74.B.4)
Property Address 2200 St. Mary's Blvd., Jefferson City, IVIO
Applicant Name MATEJO, LLC - Joe Scheppers
Provide responses to the following required findings by selecting all criteria that apply to your request. State all
reasons for your answer and use additional pages to complete your answer if necessary.
A. The existing zoning was in error at the time of adoption. Explain.
There was not an error at the time the existing was adopted.
B. There has been a change in character in the area due to installation of public facilities, other zone changes, new
growth trends, neighborhood deterioration, or development transitions. Explain the change and be specific on which
public facilities, other zone changes, new growth trends, neighborhood deterioration, or development transitions that
effected the change.
The current zoning was adopted due to the commercial nature of the adjacent properties to the
west and the south. The proposed rezoning is an extension of the existing residential zoning to
the east
C. There is a community need for the proposed rezoning.
(i.) What will the proposed zoning be?
Residential Duplex/Apartment Subdivision
(ii) Why does the community need this zoning?
To increase Residential Housing
D. The proposed change is consistent with, and in furtherance of, the implementation of the goals and policies of the
Comprehensive Plan, other adopted plans, and the policies, intents and requirements of this Ordinance and other
City regulations and guidelines.
The Comprehensive Plan shows this property as Suburban Mixed Use. The proposed RA-2
zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
Page 2 of 6
E. The proposed zoning is compatible with the zoning and uses of property nearby.
Property North — M-2 Property South — C-2
Property East — RA-2
Property West - C-2
F. Public and community facilities, which may include, but are not limited to, sanitary and storm sewers, water,
electrical service, police and fire protection, schools, parks and recreation facilities, roads, libraries, and solid waste
collection and disposal, are available and adequate to serve uses authorized under the proposed zoning. List public
and community facilities available on the site.
Sanitary Sewer- City of Jefferson
Water Supply- Missouri American
Electric- Ameren
Gas- Ameren
Telephone- Brightspeed
G. A traffic impact analysis has been provided to indicate the potential number of new trips generated and provisions
are provided to mitigate impacts of high traffic -generating projects. (See Section 35-60.Traffic Impact Analysis
regarding vehicle trip thresholds and traffic impact analysis requirements)
The size of the proposed development does not reach the threshold to require a Traffic Impact
Analysis
H. Authorized uses shall not adversely affect the capacity or safety of the street network in the vicinity of the property.
(i.) Describe the proposed use.
Residential Duplex/Apartment Complex Subdivision
(ii.) Will the proposed use adversely affect the capacity or safety of the street network in the vicinity of the
property? Why/why not?
No, because East neighborhood already has RA-2 classification. The increased traffic
volume will not excede treet capacity.
I. Potential environmental impacts (e.g., excessive storm water runoff, water pollution, air pollution, noise pollution,
excessive lighting, or other environmental harms) of authorized uses shall be mitigated. List any potential
environmental impacts and how they will be mitigated.
The primary impact will be increased storm water runoff. This will be mitigated by the
construction of a storm water detention/water quality basin.
J. There is an adequate supply of land available in the subject area and the surrounding community to accommodate
the zoning and community needs.
Yes
K. Benefits shall be derived by the community or area proposed to be rezoned. List the benefits of the proposed
rezoning.
Increase Residential Housing
Page 3 of 6
Rezoning Property Boundary Description
2200 St. Mary's Blvd. Jefferson City, MO
PROPERTY BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION -TRACT 2
Part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 11, Township 44 North, Range 12
West, in the City of Jefferson, Cole County, Missouri, more particularly described as follows:
From the northwest corner of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 11;
thence S03°20'03"E, along the Quarter Section Line, 586.54 feet to a point on the southerly right-of-way
line of U.S. Highway 50; thence easterly, along said southerly right-of-way line, on a curve to the right,
having a radius of 2699.95 feet, an arc distance of 865.57 feet (Ch=N71°15'19"E, 861.87 feet) to the
POINT OF BEGINNING for this description; thence easterly, continuing along said southerly right-of-way
line of U.S. Highway 50, on a curve to the right, having a radius of 2699.95 feet, an arc distance of 622.93
feet (Ch=N87°02'56"E, 621.55 feet) to the Quarter Quarter Section Line; thence S3°02'00"E, along the
Quarter Quarter Section Line, 545.88 feet to the northerly right-of-way line St. Mary's Boulevard; thence
along said northerly right-of-way line the following courses: westerly, on a curve to the right, having a
radius of 292.03 feet, an arc distance of 174.42 feet (Ch=S66°57'07"W, 171.84 feet); thence
S84°03'46"W, 193.72 feet; thence westerly, on a curve to the right having a radius of 708.86 feet, an arc
distance of 304.51 feet (Ch=N83°37'50"W, 302.18 feet); thence N71*19'27"W, 48.25 feet; thence leaving
said northerly right-of-way line, N16°30'23"E, 130.12 feet; thence N1'22'35"E, 426.82 feet to the point
of beginning.
Containing 9.09 acres.
40
Cole County, Missouri
NOTES:
Rezone C-2 to RA-2
500 1000
City of Jefferson, Missouri
A
North
Legend
_. Address
- Land HaP:
—I Cdy Limits
LJ County Boundaries
Parcels
Subduisions
Parcel data is for assessment purposes only. It is not a legal survey and does not purport to represent a property boundary
survey of the parcels shown. It should not be used for conveyances or the establishment of property boundaries. Do not use Printed on 7217212022
(or navigation.
'.:`
..
N
IQmossm,uNnoO
awe -tea Oral
l0[59 IarlosSIN 'Ulo NOsaa3A3I
ssK-rn (crU uxvo=N •a JIM
ONWS34 mymzLYR - ONLUMIS - ONNI3311I91,13
0uI 'saoleaaS iea0}ssa10ad unosslyy iea•}uaD
W
1.
3100',UD NOSa3333P 'oA1G SCAM ISNo018 OOZZ
S83dd3HOS 30f
IIa3NIWN313a 38 011l
1H-Id ANVNIWIl3�ld
i
p
-b
s
ZH
g g r—
a
'aa x a
of
n fie
.ao
m'O '-am
W MOW
Zp
Q F' Z 0 a
W Q '� C
8
'�y
Yry
NbYlaON
__
'Oil
fy
a3ON1513 C•-I
•_m0
Z _3 {
t!,
F E.ffCC e5B53
1
Q'i
_
Z
N N y0
kS $Sg
3SS Y9
%
U
.y
W_ N>-LL mU
�/ A
W paN
N CAJ�
o sg 'Eygz �.55 `
•' GG S9 avp
1;
a<U'
N
y
�>Q OU�.p
! aa{E yli
E� SE
apl
JJ'�
•.
G W
wZ w ; m
m
�
a E '" xgD
E �s %. €
fin'
N o E
Z V p
W .7 aoQ O.O
m (A °Ln
.Al
S2g P«Q �c e�pFs�
iFVs
C/�
a own
3
L d p
~' o n' a
' rR n=
�a G3�RS Ea€� S8
w
iE
'€
V
.:
w
a
a
zll
o
a
�
g a
gg
Nd��o
V
INS
\\\
kkkk
kk
\mNO
\ �� : \ `•. i \ \\\ \ \
Ar
p�
\�\\\\.�-7•;—"r--.--�'l�.aaa-\i ��r((\ I �)\,\\Ily''1`a,. (��i \ N`EI$15D ERA 1. �l (uxai Wvxam a' 11 `� _
/
jj //
--
��
'�aNswe+j.sLti_ /_L/
��%. -: ,H - •� =-- _ �\ �I�/ .l r - — r 7- —
1
l
k" F
City of Jefferson
Department of Planning & Protective Services
320 E. McCarty St.
Jefferson City, MO 65101
December 27, 2022
Dear Property Owner:
Carrie Tergin, Mayor
Sonny Sanders, AICP, Director
Phone: 573-634-6410
Fax: 573-634-6457
This letter is to notify you that the Jefferson City Planning and Zoning Commission will meet at 5:15 p.m.
on Thursday, January 12, 2023 in the Council Chambers of the John G. Christy Municipal Building, 320
East McCarty Street to consider the following matters (see map on back):
Case No. P23002 — 2200 Block of St. Mary's Boulevard, Rezoning from C-2 to RA-2 and Preliminary
Subdivision Plat. Request filed by MATEJO, LLC, property owner, for a rezoning of 9.09 acres from C-2
General Commercial to RA-2 High Density (Multi -Family) Residential and a preliminary subdivision plat
consisting of 25 lots. The property is located northwest of the intersection of St. Mary's Boulevard and
Heisinger Road and is described as Part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 11,
Township 44 North, Range 12 West, in the City of Jefferson, Cole County, Missouri. (Central Missouri
Professional Services, Consultant).
As a nearby landowner and/or neighbor, you are being provided notice of this hearing. Unfortunately, we
are unable to record comments received by telephone, however, written comments may be directed to the
Planning and Zoning Commission in one of the following ways:
e-mail: JCPlanning@jeffersoncitymo.gov
fax: Dept. of Planning and Protective Services / Planning Division 573-634-6457
mail: Dept. of Planning and Protective Services / Planning Division
John G. Christy Municipal Building, 320 E. McCarty Street Jefferson City, MO 65101
Written comments received on or before 1:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting will be made a part of the
official record and copied and distributed to Commission members at the meeting. Those unable to provide
written comments in advance are invited to deliver their comments to the Commission Chairman only at the
meeting. Correspondence received after 1.:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting will be included in the official
record, but there is no guarantee that copies will be made for distribution to all Commission members.
For your information, this case is tentatively scheduled for a public hearing in front of the City Council on
February 20, 2023. The City Council meets at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the John G. Christy
Municipal Building, 320 East McCarty Street.
Information regarding this case may be viewed on the Planning and Zoning Commission webpage at:
https://www.ieffersoncitymo.gov/qovernment/pIanning/planninq and zoning commission php
Please contact the Planning and Zoning Division via phone at 573.634.6573 with pertinent questions.
Best Regards,
Kortney Bliss
Planner 1
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats
as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request.
Please call (573) 634-6410 with questions regarding agenda items.
N
Case No. P23O02 w �► E
2200 Block of St. Mary's Boulevard
Rezoning from C-2 to RA-2 and Preliminary Subdivision Plat S
0 100 200 400 600 800
185 ft. Notification Buffer Feet
o�
o=
�v
a
❑
J
a
z
0
/lypU
SrR�q� pR
w
a
❑
a
J
IL
�
z
z
x
0
0
c
z
0
--_
W
z
H wYao
S0
N
ST MARYS BLVD
R
I
I
I
WILLIAM ST
O
Q'
�
Q'
MISSOURI BLVD CUDJ
Q
m
z
w
w
x
Jefferson City Planning and Zoning Commission
Property Owner list
Case No. P23002 2200 Block of St. Mary's Boulevard
BROOKE, JACOB
2120 ST MARYS BLVD
#B-1
JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65109
2120 ST MARYS UNIT 131 BLVD MO 65109
CAPITOL TRACE L L C % JEFF W
SCHAEPERKOETTER
REGISTERED AGENT
320 NISHODSE BLUFF
JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101
2110 ST MARYS BLVD MO 65109
CINCINATTI CAPITAL PARTNERS 437 L L C
ATTN:BUCHHEIT ENTERPRISES INC
33 PCR 540
PERRYVILLE, MO 63775
2304 MISSOURI BLVD MO 65109
CRABTREE, JAMES N & SARAH L
1711 SARAH LN
JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101
2120 ST MARYS UNIT B4 BLVD MO 65109
F& F DEVELOPMENT L L C
PO BOX 105045
JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65110
321 NORMAN DR MO 65109
HOGAN, LOIS A
2120 ST MARYS BLVD
UNIT B3
JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65109
2120 ST MARYS UNIT B3 BLVD MO 65109
IDEL, LARRY SHAWN & KIMBERLY M
3769 STATE ROAD AA
HOLTS SUMMIT, MO 65043
2120 ST MARYS UNIT A6 BLVD MO 65109
J B J C PROPERTIES L L C
PO BOX 1351
JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65102
2121 ST MARYS BLVD MO 65109
MATEJO L L C
849 WEATHERHILL RD
JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65109
2217 ST MARYS BLVD MO 65109
12/29/22
MEHMERT, MATTHEW W
2120 ST MARYS BLVD
#B2
JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65109
2120 ST MARYS UNIT B2 BLVD MO 65109
MILLER, FLOYD E JR
2120 ST MARYS BLVD
#A5
JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65109
2120 ST MARYS UNIT A5 BLVD MO 65109
NEW STANDARD PROPERTIES L L C
ATTN:DAVID J DRANE/DANIEL M BURKS
1200 1-70 DR SW
COLUMBIA, MO 65203
400 DIX REAR RD MO 65109
PETTY, PATRICIA
2120 ST MARYS BLVD
JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65109
2120 ST MARYS UNIT A2 BLVD MO 65109
RODEMAN, LINDA K
2120 ST MARYS BLVD
UNIT Al
JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65109
2120 ST MARYS UNIT Al BLVD MO 65109
Jefferson City Planning and Zoning Commission
Property Owner list
Case No. P23002 2200 Block of St. Mary's Boulevard 12/29/22
SMITH, EARL L JR
2120 ST MARYS BLVD
#A3
JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65109
2120 ST MARYS UNIT A3 BLVD MO 65109
STERLING DEVELOPMENT GROUP INC
4605 APPLE TREE LN
COLUMBIA, MO 65203
2108 ST MARYS BLVD MO 65109
THOMPSON, JOSHUA
2120 ST MARYS BLVD
#A-4
JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65109
2120 ST MARYS UNIT A4 BLVD MO 65109
WEST APARTMENTS L L C % COLONIAL
MANOR APTS
2111 DALTON DR
UNIT B
JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65109
2111 DALTON DR MO 65109
Jefferson City
Planning &Zoning Commission
January 12, 2023
Case No. P23003
309 & 311 Bolivar Street
Capital Opportunity Fund, LLC
Major PUD Plan Amendment
Case Packet Contents
1. Vicinity and Location Maps
2. Application
3. Staff Report
4. Council Ordinance Approving Original PUD Plan (Oct. 2020)
5. Final PUD Site Development Plan (July 2021)
6. Original Preliminary PUD Application Packet (Aug. 2020)
7. Summary of Timeline and Correspondence
8. Correspondence/Timeline Packet (41 pages)
9. Surrounding Property Owner Notification
CKy of Jefferson Planning & Zoning Commission
LOCATION MAP
Case No. P23003
309 & 311 Bolivar Street
Major PUD Plan Amendment
0 35 70 140 Feet N
W r E
S
City of Jefferson Planning and Zoning Commission
Case No. P23003
309 & 311 Bolivar Street
Major PUD Plan Amendment
VICINITY
0 55 110 220 Feet
N
W r E
S
City of Jefferson
Department of Planning & Protective Services y ;
320 E. McCarty Street i -\CEIVi
Jefferson City, MO 65101 =
Phone. 573-634-6410
JCPlanningggieffersoncitvr,70.g0
www.jeffersoncitymo.gov DEC 1 ? 2022
APPLICATION FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTk(PJDI
❑Concept PUD Plan
❑Preliminary PUD Plan
❑ Final PUD Plan
PUD Project Name: C�a c;e No . P20007
r- �:1 nyl
21 Amendment to Final PUD Plan
❑ Amendment to Final PUD Plan for Signage
Street Address: _309/311 Bolivar St Jefferson City, MO 65101
Legal Description: (as follows or is attached) _Abed
Please attach or include the following:
a) Typed project narrative describing the type and character of the development, including land uses, acreage,
proposed residential densities or commercial floor area (FAR); public or private open space, amenities or
recreation areas to be provided; sidewalks and pedestrian ways; parking areas; deviations from minimum
design standards of Section 35-51; and other information required by Section 35-74 or applicable sections
of the Zoning Code. The project title and location must be included upon every page. Number all pages and
attachments.
b) Site Plan and/or Development Plan, as applicable.
c) Preliminary or Final Subdivision Plat or Declaration of Condominium Association, as applicable;
d) Draft of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions, as applicable;
e) Traffic impact analysis, if required by Section 35-60;
f) Signage Plan, including type, locations and dimensions of all proposed signs;
g) Landscaping and Screening Plan;
h) Lighting Plan, including pole heights, type of fixtures or luminaries, and foot candles;
i) Project Phasing Plan (if applicable)
j) Application Filing Fee = $500 + $200 advertising fee + $20 per acre + $250 rezoning fee (if applicable)
(Revised July 1, 2018)
Application Information:
Property Owner: Capital Opportunity Fund, LLC
Address 320 Nishodse Blf. Jefferson City,MO 65101
Phone Number(s): 57:3_4(11 _7,1 4
Applicant Name (if different from owner):
Address
Phone Number(s):
Consultant Na
Phone Number(s):
T e attache information a urately represents this p�opetj, proct
e chaeperkoetter
Managing Member
OPVYrty Owner SignatLlre Printed Name/Title
Consultant Signature
rnn[ea Name/ I itle
12/12/2022
Date
Date
For Staff Use Only: Application Filing Fee Received Amount Check #
Attachments: Narrative Site PlanD Applicant/Project Information Sheez 'Note other information submitted on back page
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the
Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request.
Page 1 of 7
Legal Description of Property
Case No. P20007
309/311 Bolivar St.
E $MBI
The following parcel of land, lying: being and situate in Cole Counts• Missouri:
The northerly part of Inlot No. 424 in the City of Jefferson, Missouri, an
described as follows: d particulari,
Beginning on the westerly line of said Inlot 10 feet northern: of the southwest
said inlot_ thence northerly with the westerly line of said inlot 18$ feet 9 inc Southwesterly comer of
comer thereof, thence easterly with the northerly Line of said inlot 104 feet 4-1/2
inches to the northwesterly
northeasterhY corner of said inlot, thence southerly along inches to the
inches: thence in a westerly direction along y the easterly line of said inlot 1;8 feet 9
place of beginning_ and with the northerly line of the railroad Iand to the
M
Amendment Narrative (Case No. P20007)
309/311 Bolivar St.
The proposal is to amend the Final PUD Plan approved by the City by changing the
number of parking spaces and orientation of parking in the parking area north of the building,
between the building and W. Wall Way, a public alley.
The Final Plan for this area is depicted on the attached Exhibit A. As shown, it provides for
four parking spaces, two each at both the eastern and western edges of the parking area.
Exhibit B depicts the parking area as it is proposed to be if the Amendment is approved.
The proposed amendment would provide for 8 parking spaces in the same area, all to be pull -in
parking from W. Wall Way. One handicapped space with an adjacent area for accessibility is
included in both the approved and proposed parking area.
Discussion
The parking area proposed was included in a Site Plan for the property, and discussed at a
pre -submission meeting between the owner and city staff. At that meeting, staff indicated that it
would not recommend straight -in parking for approval by Planning and Zoning and the City
Council, and staff now indicates that this change can only be approved through the major
amendment process by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council.
The following policy suggestions are for the City's consideration as it processes this
application:
1. The Owner's desire to optimize off-street parking will lessen the need for on -street parking
in the area. The City's prior experience with parking issues in developed and developing
areas should cause the City to encourage off-street parking, serving the business's needs
and minimizing the impact on the neighborhood.
2. The Owner should have full and unfettered use of the West Wall Way access. It is a public
way, and Ordinance No. 16083 already contains significant protections for the City against
improper usage of the alleyway.
3. The Owner has previously raised this issue with the City and met with City staff at the site,
and the only concerns expressed by staff, in denying the change, related to restrictions on
emergency vehicles and access to the tower site at Fire Station 1. Owner believes the City
has the ability, and perhaps the legal obligation, to provide for its emergency needs without
limiting the public's use of a public way. It appears that the City has adequate space on its
own property to provide for its access needs without limiting another property owner on its
use of the public way.
The Owner believes that the proposed change will not significantly impact the City or the
public's use of W. Wall Way, and will improve traffic in the area by increasing on -site parking
and reducing the need for use of on -street parking.
Page 3
Exhibit A
Final Site Plan
Case No. P20007
309/311 Bolivar St.
FINAL PUD Siff PLAN M
. �.. — �•;.� � r`i�.�" ", .,. ��.,n�nN •-- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- --- - ...
---- --• POSED BUILD
---^.-a=----
v [r�............._..._.._....._..__.._._._._....... __ PRO [NG
_............
fir.... x`: `:. ,.ue u. sw. 3091311 BMIVAR sL=
Idfa GII. BD •� p
.. sPR0 rcr Area- 029 at= fO:FM PUD A B
y. .L0 mn ?. i y o��ra L.aav p ow a
c _+ 1 e..au(a,anv ar-=r• maam � ^L'2�
r _ . (cr PJiL 3 L,cIl .10 )IiT , y qc
S[TE [ACATION
O .n.r_.�. o.. ce. [. oy ea •--_'.-____. ____ ---- _- - -- __
aI
13
F_] ow ••..ram "• �: may'
a.
EP
wrw ...,.v t�.a•+a. n. woa.osm+
°
""`• •" �.>,.<a, wa
J
�z�
r._/a
_
B
c
m H a
•9
o0�
In
lu
T
t
0
OO6 O
a
O m R$
Y
cc
Am
STE
PLAN
�= I
C100
om rar ac^s
Ip r
Exhibit B Proposed Amendment Case No. P20007
309/311 Bolivar St.
CITY STAFF REPORT
JEFFERSON CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
January 12, 2023
Case No. P23003 — 309 & 311 Bolivar Street, Amendment to PUD Plan. Request filed by Capital
Opportunity Fund LLC, property owner, to amend the approved PUD Planned Unit Development plan to
change the number and orientation of parking spaces located on the north side of the property adjacent to
West Wall Way. The property is located on the northeast corner of the intersection of West McCarty Street
and Bolivar Street and is described as the northerly part of Inlot No. 424, in the City of Jefferson, Cole
County, Missouri.
Nature of Request
The development of the property was approved via the PUD Plan approval process. The building on the
property is a two-story building, with the lower level consisting of a coffee shop and roastery and upper
level including a one -unit short term rental/apartment.
The property owner is requesting an amendment to the approved PUD Plan with respect to the number and
orientation of parking spaces adjacent to the alley. The Final PUD plan shows 4 parking spaces accessed
via a short driveway with access to the alley. The proposed amendment shows 8 head in parking spaces
accessed from the alley.
City Staff have determined that the requested amendment does not qualify as a Minor PUD amendment,
and directed the property owner to the Major PUD Plan amendment process.
History and Sequence of Development Approvals
The Preliminary PUD Plan for the development was heard by the Planning and Zoning Commission on
September 16, 2020, and subsequently approved by the City Council on October 19, 2020. Specific
concerns by Fire Department staff regarding the arrangement of parking and access to the ally were
discussed with the applicant/property owner prior to the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting and
again prior to City Council meeting. Specific comments by the Fire Department included a need for a
physical barrier (such as a curbed island) and fire lane striping along the alley. The approving City Council
ordinance included specific requirements with respect to the access and use of the alley that were negotiated
between Fire Department/Law Department staff and the property owner and inserted as an amendment to
the Council Bill. The Preliminary PUD Site Plan included a small parking area with driveway access off
of the alley and space for two vehicles (one regular and one handicap space).
The Final PUD Development plan for the property was administratively approved by City Staff in July of
2021. The Final PUD Plan included a change in the number of parking spaces at the rear of the building,
increasing the number of parking spaces from 2 to 4, which was negotiated between the property owner
and Fire Department staff and deemed approvable within the Final PUD Plan administrative approval
process. Curbing to separate the parking lot from the alley was shown to be installed on one half of the
parking lot (the portion closer to Bolivar Street) and not installed on the other half (where a stripped loading
zone area for a handicap parking space would serve as the separating barrier along the alley). The approved
curbing was planned by Fire Administration to be visually marked as a fire lane to further restrict parallel
parking in the alley and eliminate conflict with emergency access.
On May 16, 2022, City staff recognized that the parking area was not installed according to the Final PUD
Plan, with the concrete curbing along a portion of the parking area missing. Upon inquiry, the property
owner stated their intent to pursue an amendment to the PUD Plan to permit the parking lot as constructed
(without the island) and with head in parking spaces accessed from the alley. The applicant submitted an
application for a PUD Plan Amendment, which was heard by the Panning and Zoning Commission in
August of 2022. Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval subject to installation of signage
to identify the parking as intended for use by employees and tenants of the short term rental only. The
request was heard by the City Council in September of 2022. The PUD Amendment was not approved by
the City Council. Subsequent to the City Council decision, the parking lot was installed according to the
Final PUD Plan.
Staff Analysis
The alley adjacent to the site serves as access to the rear of Fire Station Number 1. In addition to the unique
access needs associated with the public emergency service nature of the fire station, Fire Station One houses
the emergency response watercraft used when responding to emergency situations on the Missouri River
or other water emergencies. For these reasons, the nature of access to the alley has been a major item of
concern and negotiation between the owner and Fire Department personnel.
Specific staff concerns are:
1. That the orientation of the parking spaces will have a higher possibility of obstructing the alley.
The head in parking would rely on the public alley for circulation (pulling in and backing out of
cars) whereas a small parking lot with driveway access would only rely on the alley for driveway
access, not the circulation of specific vehicles accessing parking spaces.
2. That the increased number of parking spaces will result in a higher level of traffic in the alley and
a higher possibility of affecting emergency dispatch of vehicles.
During Preliminary PUD Plan consideration and approval, and subsequent administrative approval of the
Final PUD Development Plan, multiple discussions took place between the owner and Fire Department
representatives regarding concerns about the impact of the development on the adjacent alley. Specific
restrictions regarding use of the alley were negotiated through the Law Department and incorporated into
the bill approving the Preliminary PUD Plan. Potential impacts on emergency vehicle use in the alley have
been an overriding concern with respect to development of this property since the initial predevelopment
meeting in August of 2020, with multiple meetings and emails taking place regarding this subject. Please
see attached summary of timeline and correspondence.
Staff Recommendation:
Fire Department personnel are concerned that the revised parking arrangement could impact emergency
response. Use of zoning powers to regulate the level of access to public right-of-way, especially where
essential public services are heavily reliant on such right-of-way, is appropriate. Because the currently
approved parking configuration was an essential condition of staff's previous support and approval of the
original PUD plan, staff cannot recommend an amendment away from the previously negotiated parking
solution.
Approve
Not Approve
Neutral
Staff Recommendation
X
Form of Motion (all motions shall be positive, staff does not recommend approval of the required motion)
Motion to recommend approval to the City Council of the proposed PUD Plan Amendment.
Attachments:
- Ordinance 16083 — City Council approval of Preliminary PUD Plan, including:
o Specific restrictions on parking/use of the alley (contained within ordinance text)
o Preliminary PUD Site Plan
o Building Floor Plan
- Final PUD Site Plan (administratively approved by staff)
- Preliminary PUD Application packet
- Summary of timeline and correspondence
AS AMENDED
BILL NO. 2020-034
SPONSORED BY Councilmember Graham
ORDINANCE NO. 6 61
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON APPROVING A
PRELIMINARY PUD PLAN FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 311 BOLIVAR
STREET.
WHEREAS, Oakbrook Properties LLC, owner of the real estate hereinafter
described having submitted a Preliminary PUD Plan Amendment of
said real estate described as follows; The northerly part of Inlot No.
424 in the City of Jefferson, Missouri, more particularly described
as follows: Beginning on the westerly line of said Inlot 10 feet
northerly of the southwesterly corner of said Inlot, thence northerly
with the westerly line of said Inlot 188 feet 9 inches to the
northwesterly corner thereof, thence easterly with the northerly line
of said Inlot 104 feet, 4.5 inches to the northeasterly corner of said
Inlot, thence southerly along the easterly line of said Inlot 138 feet,
9 inches, thence in a westerly direction along and with the northerly
line of the railroad land to the place of beginning. Containing 0.38
acres, more or less; and
WHEAEAS, it appears that the procedures set forth in the Zoning Code relating
to Planned Unit Developments have in all matters been complied
with, as said property owner submitted to the Planning and Zoning
Commission and City Council a Preliminary PUD Plan for the above
referenced property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Preliminary PUD Plan, on file as Case No. P20007 in the
Jefferson City Planning Division is hereby approved for the land referenced
above.
Section 2. Permitted Land Uses. Permitted uses for the property shall be
limited to Roastery, Short Term and Long Term Residential Rental, General
Retail, Coffee Shop, and any permitted uses of the C-2 zoning district. Signage
and lighting shall adhere to the allowances of the C-2 zoning district.
Section 3. Common Areas and Public Land. No common areas are
proposed and no lands are dedicated to public use with this PUD Plan.
Section 4. The public alleyway known as "W. Wall Way" (the "alleyway")
shall be designated as "no parking" from the intersection of the alleyway and
Bolivar St. to the eastern property line of the subject property. The alleyway
shall not be used in the operations of any commercial or residential use on the
subject property in that no owner or occupant of the subject property shall
suggest, encourage, or, with knowledge, allow or permit vendors, customers,
tenants, or invitees to park, idle, or block the alleyway at any time. Nothing in this
paragraph shall be construed (1) to prohibit the use of the alleyway for general
vehicular or pedestrian access to the parking lot on the subject property which is
directly adjacent to the alleyway; (2) to prohibit ingress and egress along any
point of the alleyway adjacent to the subject property; (3) to prohibit the owner or
occupant from trash service pickup along the alleyway; or (4) to criminalize or
otherwise force any vehicular user to not comply with any traffic regulations of
the City of Jefferson, such as stopping at stop signs or yielding to
pedestrians. Furthermore, nothing in this paragraph shall require the owner or
occupant of the subject property to enforce the parking, idling, or blocking
restriction in any way other than making a reasonable effort to obtain voluntary
compliance and, if unsuccessful, reporting the suspected violation to the City of
Jefferson for either police or towing action.
Section 5. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage and approval.
Presiding Officer
ATTEST:
i
City Clerk
Approved: Q i� , 2012 0 2O
��►` :Eel
Mayor Carrie Tergin
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City At#'oy
warww
IHfIOSSIW'A1NA003100'AUDNOSH33z3f
ots
S
W��'•
W > v
- 4'�I wa`
133H1S HVAIIOB llS/60S
6
>
CL
e5ea-tt9 (i[t)
SSK-H9 (Cts)
IOISB NI(1O55U1 'ALJ N0533d13t
AIM-K 1009Z
t
`�Yt .
R
011 'S31183dOHd NOOHGNVO
e
-
M o O
J O
kn -
o
6
'JNL= S'IVM31YR - 'JNIA3MrIS - 'JNMaNION3
auI 'saatAlaS FUOISSa;oad !-MOSS[N je11u90
„
hs «-
a
(� l J u J
Eftai I Ie Q7SOa OOO
i d
Fy
Q
p w
a
as en 6
0., w ra
o
V
If: Il
'�'
L
Q "
PI ti
CD
die-;Y•/��
n
; :
W
s
_
---x--
I
rT
jai
Mog
I ----------
I $
-- c
— — fi - —
" T
------------- - - -
,/ F L re: III 0
.1¢' �aaiTg 6�aa�oR leaµ w A ry
" a Z I
• �� w�,� O I I I 1
S
�------------------------------
I-� ✓f
UO
a f I
E \ i
IHnosSIW'Amnoo MOO MO NOSH3JJ3r
133H1S HVAI100 L LEWC
o
N.
J
6
Q
#
86 -K9 (cis)
SSK-KB (CLS) SOISB OIOOSSIII '.M N0- GGGzt
x.wrs=n 'a Dosz
'mot i ..� � �5
'
eft.12
011 'S3111i3dOHd NOOHGAVO
z
"
-
= qZ C
Co- g T- 'g
C
DNIJRdl SIYRIaEYR - D=Uuns - DNINaaN[DN3
r
61S
4
JNI(nne a3Sodoad
F v
e
'DUI 'SgZ)L @S IPUOTSS@Joj l 1MOSSINj jea}uao
8i
E .'7 >:N :_:/'�..;
�1QOob
$ I
II R I il; I �k
I O
f ;I:
I I y 111, I :a yts
I I
-1
•�
�_, o�
o.I
B
�\!`''�
►o
oa
o
e
N .
:P:
o39s;
9106
Fgna
INN
I
Mill
=qq
�i I
y o
"s
15
Idg
..................................... a of
6 .�.. -... -_
�M un-
f .... t`u-- f !lttil
I= t 8
\�� I Saaz7S S7.fa��M 15aAi
-0 u
OU
e a q ael jag
to 3'1
ff- oo®o®® o ®®®® 9100000 00 0o0Q1a00
O �
3
idnosslw'AlNnoo3ioo',WONosug:13f z
0
133kl15 kfVAll08 llEl60E
O
011 'S31183dOdd NOON VO w J 4
10190 INNOSSM 'A= NOSN33d3f 4 O; ) i Q T
ALNtlJ�A 'N 0052 tY�f3 Z
ONUSU s1VRI8.LYA - ONIA3ANf15 - 0NN133NION3 66 « .. J O U
JNla�lfl8 4�SOdO�Id
a S � •ouI 'saoieaag Ieuotssa;oad unossryq jea}ua� `" '" a a d � � � C.)
1
I�
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
x..............
e
--
a
�l
9 • d pppp
--
.-.case-ti+s"�i1r—
s
z IN
f$ e¢ n s�m JJEE�y pggx z
s fill B 1111a .
SIR N
6 4gggg��y g �y9 Its-i11 gsp�elg
St1b 2�io 5 g88Y'.°i#a#g!-g6
wnossivV 1Nn003100'uIoNOsii3333r
,� j 133N1s t1VA1108 1060E o z N �
Fri• 'E 1': �\ WR U
s K99-rc9 (c sI 0ll 'S31i83d0Hd >1008aH0 a w s o
d rows ranossIn •u�o Nosa3.s93r
a sscc-�s9 fc,$) p m ou€ ONLL.SAl NaOH'3OOSZ
mm m ommmns - ONJ33MI
Mio-iie O7WdOc}itanoJ Ontss€ut}uao'saa[o
C'
a
is
h� N
mg
as. &5
e 20. Az
� q3�g FEm mm� a
m sa jb y
w
m f t
4 r!qll ; €t w
�kalki eiF }f+}i! ftt` w w
U
Zn. a U.
W .9 w
It �
11
iis€i} IiP its 0i
z dg
�3 s
O O O O O a
w
room o, t ` O
1 0-
y
� J
w
iD
[O
So
1 U
gs Up
pit
J
t: N
ttl pF %��i ,5
ita$ LL9SR 6 iiuu _
8 1 s t
City of Jefferson
Department of Planning & Protective Services
320 E. McCarty Street
Jefferson City, MO 65101
Phone: 573-634-6410
1cplannlnarcDier,'cityrno.orcr
www.jeffersoncitymo.gov
APPLICATION FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD)
❑ Concept PUD Plan ❑ Amendment to Final PUD Plan
R Preliminary PUD Plan ❑ Amendment to Final PUD Plan for Signage
❑ Final PUD Plan
PUD Project Name: Oakbrook Properties
Street Address: W. Mr'C:art!Z StrPPt (600 block number not vet assigned)
Legal Description: (as follows or is attached) Attached
Please attach or include the following:
a) Typed project narrative describing the type and character of the development, including land uses, acreage,
proposed residential densities or commercial floor area (FAR); public or private open space, amenities or
recreation areas to be provided; sidewalks and pedestrian ways; parking areas; deviations from minimum
design standards of Section 35-51; and other information required by Section 35-74 or applicable sections
of the Zoning Code. The project title and location must be included upon every page. Number all pages and
attachments.
b) Site Plan and/or Development Plan, as applicable.
c) Preliminary or Final Subdivision Plat or Declaration of Condominium Association, as applicable;
d) Draft of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions, as applicable;
e) Traffic impact analysis, if required by Section 35-60;
f) Signage Plan, including type, locations and dimensions of all proposed signs;
g) Landscaping and Screening Plan;
h) Lighting Plan, including pole heights, type of fixtures or luminaries, and foot candles;
i) Project Phasing Plan (if applicable)
j) Application Filing Fee = $500 + $200 advertising fee + $20 per acre + $250 rezoning fee (if applicable)
(Revised July 1, 2018)
Application Information:
Property Owner: Oakb,
Address 320 Nishod,
Phone Number(s): 573—;
Applicant Name (if different from owner):
Address
Phone Number(s):
Consultant Name:
Address:
Phone Number(s):
e attached ormation ac rately represents this proposed project
Jeff W. Schaeperkoetter, Member 8/9/2020
fUoA4 Owner bignature I Printed Name/Title Date
Consultant Signature Printed Name/Title Date
For Staff Use Only. Application Filing Fee Received Amount Check # s
Attachments: Narrative Site Plan ApplicantlProject Information Sheet 'Note other information submitted on back page
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the
Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request
Page 1 of 7
City of Jefferson
Department of Planning & Protective Services
320 E. McCarty Street
Jefferson City, MO 65101
Phone: 573-634-6410
icnlan ninu(aDlefi`ci�vmo. oi•a
www jeffersoncitymo.gov
Project Information (Please use additional sheets if necessary)
Name of Project
Oakbrook Properties
Location/Address
W. McCarty Street 600 block number not yet assi ned
Submitted by
Oakbrook Properties, L.L.C.
Applications Submitted
(Check box and circle
item)
® P&Z: Zonin! Amend Comp Plan Amend Special Exce tion UD Sub. Plat Annexation
❑ BOA: CUP Variance Appeal
❑ Staff: Site Plan Bldg Plans Grading Plan Change of Use Temp Use
❑ Other:
Consultant(s) (List lead consultant and all others who are responsible for major project elements)
Lead Consultant Name
Firm Name
Address
Telephone Number
Fax No.
E-Mail
Consultant Name
Firm Name
Address
Telephone Number
Fax No.
E-Mail
Consultant Name
Firm Name
Address
Telephone Number
Fax No.
E-Mail
Property Owners/Applicants (List owner; Mark "X" next to the name of the primary contact)
Owner Name
Oakbrook Properties, L.L.C.
Address
320 Ni hodse Blf TRffRr_qnn CitV ml F;51 ni
Telephone No.
.,
573-301-7514
Fax No.
E-Mail ljwschae@hotmail.com
Applicant Name
Oakbrook Properties, L.L.C.
Address
320 Nishodse Blf, Jefferson City, MO 65101
Telephone No.
573-301-7514
Fax No.
E-Mail ljwschae@hotmail.com
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the
Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request
Page 2 of 7
EXHIBTI' A
The following parcel of land, lying, being and situate in Cole County, Missouri:
The northerly part of Inlot No. 424 in the City of Jefferson, Missouri, and particularly
described as follows:
Beginning on the westerly line of said Inlot 10 feet northerly of the southwesterly corner of
said inlot, thence northerly with the westerly line of said inlot 188 feet 9 inches to the northwesterly
corner thereof, thence easterly with the northerly line of said inlot 104 feet 4-1/2 inches to the
northeasterly corner of said inlot, thence southerly along the easterly line of said inlot 138 feet 9
inches, thence in a westerly direction along and with the northerly line of the railroad land to the
place of beginning.
ATTACHMENT TO PRELIMINARY PUD APPLICATION
Oakbrook Properties, L.L.C.
Property at corner of Bolivar and McCarty Streets (0.40 acres)
The Preliminary Plan for the Planned Unit Development District includes the following:
(1) The scale and north point. Shown on survey.
(2) Boundaries of the property to be developed. Shown on survey.
(3) The names of the owners of the property and the individual or firm responsible for the preparation
of the Preliminary Plan. Current Owner of the property and individual responsible for preparation of
plan: Oakbrook Properties, L.L.C., 320 Nishodse Blf, Jefferson City, MO 65101; and Jeff W.
Schaeperkoetter, Managing Member of Oakbrook Properties, L.L.C., with assistance from CMPS for
topographic survey and Porter, Berendzen & Associates, P.C., Architects, for plat overlay (Site Study).
(4) The existing zoning of the tract and the zoning of properties which are within 200 feet of the
boundaries of the property. Current zoning of the property: PUD. The property to the north is also
zoned PUD. The property immediately to the south and east is also zoned PUD. Across the railroad
tracks to the southeast, across McCarty to the south and southwest, and across Bolivar to the west (and
south of Wall Way) is zoned C-2. Across Bolivar to the west (and north of Wall Way) is zoned RA-2 and
C-1. The State parking lot to the southeast on McCarty is zoned C-3
(5) The location, type and size of structures, on properties within 200 feet of the boundaries of the
property. To the south across McCarty Street are commercial structures of varying sizes. To the west
across Bolivar Street are a mix of structures with commercial and residential uses. To the north across
Wall Way, a public way, is the large fire station for Jefferson City.
(6) Acreage of the property to be included in the Planned District. The total area of the property is
17,060.4 square feet, for an acreage of slightly less than 0.40 acres.
(7) Existing contours on an interval of not more than five feet and not less than two feet. The Owner
has engaged CMPS to produce a topographic survey with existing contours on intervals of one (1) foot.
A copy of that survey is provided with this application.
(8) The location and direction of drainage of all water courses and a drainage plan with sufficient
information to indicate the intent of the owner. This site drains toward the south and southwest
(toward the railroad right-of-way at the southern boundary of the property) and the existing stormwater
drainage is in the Bolivar Street right-of-way at the southwest corner of the property. At the south of the
property, a "bioswale" area of sufficient size and capacity will be constructed to allow for drainage of
the initial 1.37" rain event for the 17,000 square feet area to be treated.
(9) The location of existing and proposed sanitary sewers. Existing sanitary sewers are shown on the
topographic survey.
Oakbrook Properties, L.L.C. PUD Application (600 Block of W. McCarty Street)
(10) The proposed size, location, height, use and arrangement of all buildings except single family
dwellings; the location and capacity of off-street parking areas, entrance and exit driveways and their
relationship to existing and proposed streets; building lines; easements; common land and open space;
and proposed streets, alleys and pedestrian ways.
a Size, location and arrangement of buildings are shown on the plat overlay. The height of
the buildings will not exceed that allowed by the City Code.
o A driveway is currently located onto Bolivar Street near the intersection with McCarty
Street. The driveway will be relocated to the north and farther away from the said
intersection as shown on the plat overlay. A driveway at the rear of the building (to the
northwest) will enter on to Wall Way as shown on the plat overlay.
o Easements, streets, alleys and a pedestrian sidewalk are shown on the plat overlay.
o Parking analysis (see separate Discussion attached):
Coffee roastery-800 square feet (Mfg/production category) -Two employees-
2.2 spaces
Office space-300 square feet-1 per 300 sq.ft. GFA-1 space
Coffee shop (see below for proposal of parking requirement for this space)-
1,800 square feet plus 300 outdoor-9 spaces at 1 per 250 square feet.
Short term rental-800 square feet-2 spaces (on -street parking permitted)
Less "Old Town" allowance for on -street parking-5 spaces (based on frontage
over 125 feet)
In sum, 9.2 spaces off-street is required. In order to allow for the normal
periods of higher customer traffic, an extra 5 spaces is considered adequate, for a total
of 15 spaces as optimal. The attached site plan contains 19 spaces, and the plan will
provide that those spaces will be larger than the minimum required by Ordinance.
(11) Proposed landscaping and buffer zones. Shade trees will be provided as required (possible
locations shown on the site study), and other landscaping on -site. No buffer zones are required.
(12) Provide for the dedication of any right-of-way for the widening, extension or connection of major
streets as shown in the Thoroughfare Plan. No dedication of any right-of-way is proposed as there are
no impacts on street widths.
(13) Establish the underlying zoning, mix of uses, density, layout, design and phasing of the proposed
Planned Unit Development. Owner proposes a mix of uses which would include all uses permitted in C-
2 zones. No phasing of the Development is proposed.
Other notes:
1. Off-street loading will comply with City Code.
2. Visual clear zones: Sight triangles are clear as shown on site study.
3. Setbacks: In view of the small size of the property, Owner requests that setback requirements be
waived
Oakbrook Properties, L.L.C. PUD Application (600 Block of W. McCarty Street)
Other Notes (continued):
4. Signage: Signage will be compliant with the City's signage ordinance. The Owners anticipate a
free-standing sign positioned along the South boundary of the property (shown on site study).
5. Lighting: Lighting for the Parking lot will be designed and placed in accordance with City
requirements (proposed location shown on site study).
6. Fire Hydrants: Fire hydrants are currently located at the property and meet City requirements.
Plan Approval:
Commission Chairperson Date
Director of Community Development Date
Oakbrook Properties, L.L.C. PUD Application (600 Block of W. McCarty Street)
(Vote: Discussion for coffee shop parking requirement. The Owner's Redevelopment Contract with the
Housing Authority required 2,500 square feet of floor space. In consideration of subsequent social
distancing and spacing requirements suggested by public health officials, and the impact on inside
seating for coffee shop purposes, the Owner and its prospective tenant have opted to increase the floor
space of the coffee shop from 1,400 to 1,800 square feet. The larger size will seek to accommodate the
expected customer usage with greater spacing between tables and seating areas.
The City Code provides categories for parking requirement such as bar/tavern, smoking lounge and
restaurant (all at 1 parking space for 100 square feet of gross floor area), general retail (1 per 250), and
low volume retail (1 per 500). The Code also provides: "The Director shall determine the parking
requirement for uses which do not correspond to the categories listed in Exhibit 35-58A. In such
instances, the applicant shall provide adequate information by which the proposal can be reviewed."
The Owner proposes that the general retail category be applied, or, in the alternative, that the
Director determine that the coffee shop use does not correspond to the categories listed in the Code,
and that 1 parking space per 250 square feet be required. The following information is provided to
support the alternative requests:
Type of uses: Coffee shop for consumption of coffee, other drink and limited food items, retail sales
of bag coffee and other items, area for preparation of items available for consumption on -site, with
amenities on -site such as restrooms and areas for viewing.
Number of employees: Two service employees at higher volume times.
Building design capacity: To be determined.
Square feet of sales area, service area, etc.: Seating (800), Sales/ordering (300), handicapped
accessible restrooms (200), kitchen/preparation (500).
Parking spaces proposed on -site: 17 per site study, but may have to be adjusted depending on set-
back, loading zones and other contingencies.
Parking spaces provided elsewhere: 5 on -street parking spaces. State parking lot within 200 feet.
Hours of operation: Generally, 6 a.m. to 5 p.m. daily (currently not open Sunday), may be expanded.
i
I _
,
a: vi
r ,
'
d
ff
a
W
a
a
s
0
N
m
w
A
In
U
Three Story Coffee
Summary of timeline and correspondence
Page Preliminary PUD Plan — submittal, staff review, P&Z Review, City Council approval.
1-2 July 13 —30, 2020 Email chain re: PUD site plan pre -submittal
3-5 August 4, 2020 Pre -development meeting with property owner. (see attached staff notes and visuals
from meeting)
6 August 10, 2020 Email re: application submittal and pre -submittal fire department discussions
7-11 September 4-13, 2020 Email chain re: staff comments on PUD Plan in advance of P&Z meeting, including
reference to Fire department comments, and response by owner.
12 September 14, 2020 Email with revised site PUD plan.
September 16, 2020 P&Z Commission Meeting. Recommendation for approval of Preliminary PUD Plan.
13-17 October 16-22, 2020 Email chain between applicant and Law Department re: incorporation of alley parking and
use restrictions into PUD Council Bill.
October 19, 2020 Approval of Preliminary PUD Plan by City Council, via substitute bill incorporating alley
parking and use restrictions.
Page Final PUD Plan — submittal, staff review, staff approval
April 5, 2021 Submittal of Final PUD Plan by Central Missouri Professional Services. The plan showed installation
of head in parking off of alley.
18 April 8, 2021 Correspondence from CMPS to Planning Division RE: telephone discussion and FD/Owner
Coordination
April 9, 2021 Internal city staff meeting (Fire Dept, Law Dept, Planning Dept) regarding Final PUD Plan submittal.
19 April 9, 2021 Correspondence from CMPS to Planning Division RE: revised site plan sheet.
April 9, 2021 Submittal of revised Final PUD Plan by CMPS
20-21 May 6, 2021 Staff comments to CMPS regarding Final PUD Plan.
June 21, 2021 Revised Final PUD Plan submitted by CMPS
July 9, 2021 Approval of Final PUD Plan by staff.
Page Tract Division of Neighboring Railroad Property — submittal, staff review, staff approval
22 June 23-24, 2021 Email chain re: Tract division (Union Pacific property) review status.
23-25 July 15, 2021 Email chain re: Tract division comments by staff.
September, 2021 Submittal of signed document, approval, and recording of tract division
Page Rear Parking Area — correspondence and meetings between staff and owner
26-27 May 16-18, 2022 Email chain re: parking lot installation (not according to plan) and response by owner
28-29 May 25-June 5, 2022 Email chain re: Meeting between owner and Fire Department regarding parking.
May 31, 2022 Meeting held between owner and Fire Department.
30 June 3, 2022 Email to Planning division re: meeting between owner and fire department and sign permit
question.
31-33 June 5, 2022 Email chain re: meeting between owner and fire department and fire department
response.
34-35 June 27, 2022 Planning Staff inquiry on owners plans and response.
36-37 June 28, 2022 Email re: Temporary Certificate of Occupancy issuance
Temporary CO attached, issued with conditions on bringing the parking into conformance
Page Amended PUD Plan — application submittal. P&Z review, City Council decision
38-39 July 7-11, 2022 Email chain re: Request PUD amendment be deemed a "minor amendment", and response
by Planning Division Staff.
August 11, 2022 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. Recommendation for approval subject to
conditions.
40-41 August 24-29, 2022 Email chain re: Staff recommendation to City Council post P&Z meeting.
September 6/19 Introduction / Public hearing at City Council. Bill failed on a 5/5 vote.
-----Original Message -----
From: Jeff <jwschae@hotmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2020 2:09 PM
To: Zollinger, Ian <IZollinger@jeffcitymo.org>
Cc: Wade, Shane <SWade@jeffcitymo.org>; Barron, Eric <EBarron@jeffcitymo.org>; Vande Voorde, Dan
<DVandeVoorde@jeffcitymo.org>; Nanoski, Ahnna <ANanos ki@jeffcitymo.org>
Subject: Re: PUD Information
Tuesday will work for me.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 30, 2020, at 1:52 PM, Zollinger, Ian <IZollinger@jeffcitymo.org> wrote:
> Jeff,
> Tuesday would work better with City Staff and the availability of appropriately sized rooms. Please let me know if
that does not work. I will send this around to those who review plans and we will have some preliminary comments
prepared for you at that time.
> From: Jeff [mailto:jwschae@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2020 1:21 PM
> To: Zollinger, Ian
> Cc: Tony Anderson; Scott
> Subject: Re: PUD Information
> Ian: I am attaching a draft of the narrative that will accompany the actual PUD application, which I have printed off
from the City's website, and hope to be able to submit to you by the August 10 deadline for consideration by the P &
> I am also going to forward to you the site study prepared by the Berendzen firm, which shows an overlay of the topo
survey prepared by CMPS and the proposed location and size of the building and parking areas. I also have the
oversized version of the survey itself, which I will provide with the application. If you need to see it in advance, please
let me know.
> I would like to have the opportunity to visit with you about this and discuss its contents and any thoughts you may
have. Monday would be good for me, about anytime. Please let me know what would work for you.
> Jeff Schaeperkoetter
> Oakbrook Properties, L.L.C.
> [X]
> From: Zollinger, Ian
> <IZollinger@jeffcitymo.org<maiIto: IZoIli nger@jeffcitymo.org>>
> Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020 3:57 PM
> To: jwschae@hotmail.com<mailto:jwschae@hotmail.com>
> <jwschae@hotmail.com<mailto:jwschae@hotmail.com>>
> Subject: PUD Information
Coorespondence/Timeline Packet
Page 1
> The site plan should show the property boundaries, it should show the location of the building in relation to the
property lines and other buildings if there are any. Parking stalls and widths of driveways. The plan should be to scale.
> If you have any more questions please let me know and like I said we can meet to go over what you have. I am
confident that we can get you to a place where we can bring it to the Planning and Zoning Commission.
> Ian Zollinger
> Planner
> Department of Planning & Protective Services City of Jefferson
> 320 E. McCarty St.
> Jefferson City, MO 65101
> Direct Phone - 573-634-6313
> Fax - 573-634-6457
> <meeting.ics>
Coorespondence/Timeline Packet
Page 2
a ll� //Cmwp
,:Z:-cj,, 4�
>%ft �r A�
/lam
W— c —�" Z, e-
Coorespondence/Timeline Packet
Page 3
Packet
Page 4
u
I
to
a
LL
----- -------
tL
.—_ O
o-
m
m�
0
n
ine Packet
Page 5
From: Jeff <jwschae@hotmail.com>
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2020 8:13 AM
To: Zollinger, Ian <IZollinger@jeffcitymo.org>
Cc: Barron, Eric <EBarron@jeffcitymo.org>; Sarah Anderson <threestoryoffice@gmail.com>; Tony
Anderson <threestorycoffee@gmail.com>
Subject: PUD Application
Ian: I will be bringing in the application package first thing this morning. Please let me know if
there are concerns that I need to deal with.
There are some minor revisions in the drawings to that back parking area and the driveway
onto Bolivar (and trees. lights and signs), and I did share the revised drawing with Chief Turner
because of the fire department's concerns that he expressed. I also made some slight revisions
to other areas of the attachment, including putting an "optimum" number of parking spaces
outside of any mathematical calculation.
Thank you for the meeting the other day.
Jeff
Coorespondence/Timeline Packet
Page 6
From: Jeff <jwschae@hotmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2020 9:43 PM
To: Wade, Shane <SWade@jeffcitymo.org>
Cc: Barron, Eric <EBarron@jeffcitymo.org>; Zollinger, Ian <IZollinger@jeffcitymo.org>; Nanoski, Ahnna
<ANanoski@jeffcitymo.org>; Bange, David <DBange@jeffcitymo.org>; Fontana, Don
<DFontana@jeffcitymo.org>; Bonnot, Len <LBonnot@jeffcitymo.org>; Turner, Jason
<JTu rner@ jeffcitymo.org>
Subject: Re: Coffee Shop B n B Prelim PUD, Bolivar Street @ West McCarty Street, Engineering Division P
& Z Review Comments Mark-up, 1st Review
Shane: I hope to be getting to you and the others, before noon today, new pdfs. I was able to
get the pdfs enlarged and changed to show (1) some of the notes in the margin as requested in
your mark-up, (2) labeling changes to the "Site Study" as you requested, along with the
approval signature and date area, which I omitted from the original application, and (3) the
dimensions of the building and parking spaces and lanes in a more readable fashion. I also
delivered to your office on Friday the full-size survey by CMPS which shows utility locations and
survey detail.
I would like to incorporate the Commission's "Location Map" into the application to reflect the
zoning of the adjacent parcels, which was noted in a narrative fashion in the application. That
map also shows the nature of the adjoining buildings in a better fashion than I could do (other
than in the narrative notes), but I would be happy to supplement the application with
photographs that I could -e-mail to you as early as Tuesday morning, if you or other staff feel
that the Commission members may need to see those photographs.
I would note that a couple of the mark-up notes were not addressed further than the
commentary and notes provided in narrative fashion with my application. For instance, there is
no driveway currently considered at the east side of the proposed building. Of course, if that
changes, appropriate steps will be taken to protect the building with bollards or the like. As to
drainage, the bioswale will require engineering/landscape architect work, but my research
indicates that there is ample space to provide a bioswale area that will meet the City's
requirements. I did not undertake to show the visual clear zones, and do not see an issue
there, and the final plan can depict those with more accuracy.
I will have the new pdfs in shape to send to you and the others on this chain before noon
tomorrow, but I wanted you and the others to have this e-mail first thing in the morning, so am
sending this without the new pdfs now.
Please call me at 573-301-7514 if you or any of the others have any questions.
Jeff
From: Jeff <iwschae@hotmail.com>
Sent: Friday, September 11, 2020 9:48 AM
Coorespondence/Timeline Packet
Page 7
To: Wade, Shane <SWade@ieffcitymo.org>
Cc: Barron, Eric <EBarron@ieffcitymo.org>; Zollinger, Ian <IZollinger@ieffcitymo.org>; Nanoski, Ahnna
<ANanoski@leffcitymo.org>; Bange, David <DBange@leffcitymo.org>; Fontana, Don
<DFontana@ieffcitymo.org>; Bonnot, Len <LBonnot@ieffcitymo.org>; Turner, Jason
<JTurner@leffcitymo.org>
Subject: Re: Coffee Shop B n B Prelim PUD, Bolivar Street @ West McCarty Street, Engineering Division P
& Z Review Comments Mark-up, 1st Review
Shane: Thanks for your e-mail. Sorry I did not get it until you re -sent it yesterday, as it went to
my junk mail and I was notable to access that from my phone which seems weird tome! I have
contacted PBA Architects this morning about doing slightly larger versions without the
pixillation issues and adding some information. I may be hearing something back from them as
early as today.
I do have a large version of the original survey that I will drop off at your office this
morning. That should be helpful on the legibility and the topographical lines. I did note that
CMPS did the "topo" on one -foot intervals, which is not, of course, and unfortunately, "not less
than two" as required by the Plan ordinance. That was done because, as you might expect, the
grading of the lot will be a critical feature of our building and parking plans there.
I have talked with the fire department about the parking adjacent to the alley. There will need
to be a retaining wall and the parking will be lower than alley level, and we will follow all survey
lines in the completion of the project, and we will make every reasonable effort to reduce the
impact on the fire department's operational requirements. We will be good neighbors. I am
planning on showing some of the details like the drainage on the final plan, and avoiding
existing infrastructure will obviously be engineered and planned. The visual clear zone at the
driveways, while I think clearly not an issue with the placement of the building, could also be
shown then. My understanding is that I cannot commence construction until the Final Plan is
filed, and things like bollards, retaining walls, sewer connections and the like may be more
clearly plannable with the building design done. In addition, we have not yet identified the size
and type of structure for the signage, and I have thought that a separate permit was required
for that, and the PUD application only needed to show sign location(s).
Just for my own clarification, the "Location Map" that accompanied the city's notices depicts
the adjacent zoning and the type and size of the adjacent structures. Will you need more
information than that? I could provide pictures of the structures in that area as an
addendum. As you mentioned, I provided some of the information in the written
commentary. I noticed on some of the previous PUD submissions by other developers that
those were simply in narrative form on the survey plan itself.
Thank you again for your contact. I will be as diligent as I can to get you the information
quickly. We obviously want the City's staff to be able recommend approval to the Commission,
and will do our best to enable that to happen.
Please understand as we move forward that my wife and I are trying to avoid unnecessary
expense at this stage of the re -development. We take that approach because we realize that
either the P & Z Commission or City Council could delay or derail our redevelopment. Be
assured that we will undertake any reasonable expense after preliminary plan approval to
complete the redevelopment project and protect our investment in the real estate itself.
Jeff
Coorespondence/Timeline Packet
Page 8
From: Wade, Shane <SWade@ieffcitymo.org>
Sent: Friday, September 4, 2020 10:19 AM
To:'jwschae@hotmail.com' <iwschae@hotmail.com>
Cc: Barron, Eric <EBarron@ieffcitymo.org>; Zollinger, Ian <IZollinger@ieffcitymo.org>; Nanoski, Ahnna
<ANanoski@ieffcitymo.org>; Bange, David <DBange@ieffcitymo.org>; Fontana, Don
<DFontana@ieffcitymo.org>; Bonnot, Len <LBonnot@ieffcitymo.org>; Turner, Jason
<JTu rner@ ieffcitymo.org>
Subject: Coffee Shop B n B Prelim PUD, Bolivar Street @ West McCarty Street, Engineering Division P & Z
Review Comments Mark-up, 1st Review
Jeff -
Please find attached our review comments mark-up regarding the preliminary PUD for the Coffee
Shop/ B & B at the corner of Bolivar Street and West McCarty Street.
It is really hard to read any important information regarding the topo/ survey in the background from
this plan. It contains a lot of the information (utilities, sewer, curb/ sidewalk etc.) that we look over.
I don't know if it was shaded too much, or the scan pixel size makes it difficult to read, either way we
need a better plan. Full size plans for the resubmittal would be very helpful once the pixilation/
shading issue is resolved.
With the comments attached, I have tried to reference the number of the specific comment in the
checklist that it refers back to. Some of the information is contained in the narrative of the
application, but needs to really be information contained on the preliminary PUD plan as well.
The Fire Department is requesting some type of physical barrier/ i.e. curbing, island, bollards,
landscaping and/ or combination thereof for the parking next to the alleyway. This will need to
occur on the property, not the alleyway. We want to ensure that encroachment of parking does
not interfere with the alley property in any way. Please refer to the attached mark-up for more
specific location/ information.
We will need to prepare our Staff Reports for the meeting next week, so if we could have a
resubmittal of the revised drawing(s) as soon as possible next week, it would be beneficial. Our
goal would be to write our staff reports without having to address the comments contained
within this review comments mark-up for the site plan in order to recommend approval of the
plan.
I believe most of the comments should be straight forward, but let me know if you need any
clarification (s).
Thanks.
Shane Wade
Shane Wade, P.E.
Plan Review and Development Engineer
City of Jefferson Dept. of Public Works
Engineering Division
573.634.6449 0
573.634.6457 F
swade@ieffcitvmo.org
Coorespondencerrimeline Packet
Page 9
l��� a r /\vA_, li✓e S 1� /YI c �a• .�t�zef I rc l----- 4 t)
a •Y
Co 65�re �Z OP 5
I3131 �Z a
approval.
A Concept Plan application and submittal shall be reviewed based on criteria established in Section
35-27 as well as the criteria for zoning changes, Section 35-74.B.4, and the criteria for a Preliminary
Plan in Section 35-74.C.3.
The Planning and Zoning Commission shall approve, conditionally approve or deny approval of all
applications for a Concept Plan.
PUD Preliminary Plan.
a. A PUD Preliminary Plan constitutes a major step in the review process. A rezoning application shall
be submitted with the PUD Preliminary Plan application. The accepted "design" density indicated in
the Concept Plan approval cannot be presumed as a matter perimeter rights -of -way shall be
dedicated at the time the Preliminary Plan is approved right from the PUD zoning designation, but
shall be justified at the preliminary stage through site and structure design. The Council may limit
the density on all or any portion of a PUD if it determines that the design fails to fulfil the purposes
of this Ordinance and Section-
b. Application requirements and processing procedures shall comply with those described in Section
35-70 and Section 35-71, with the following modifications:
(f) If the PUD Preliminary Plan proposes multiple phases, specific densities shall be assigned
to each phase. Density at each preliminary phase shall be justified by specific design.
Density from one phase may be shifted to another phase subject to Council approval. The
Council, in approving the PUD Preliminary Plan, may conduct the first reading o` the
rezoning ordinance for the area described in the PUD Preliminary Plan.
(2) If a PUD Preliminary Plan is approved, the applicant shall submit a Final PUD Plan and
Subdivision Plat application in accordance with the approved development schedule.
(3) The City may require that a homeowners association or corporation be created to maintain
and administer the project's lands or facilities. Articles of Incorporation and Restrictive
Covenants shall be recorded at, or prior to, the recording of the Final PUD Plan and Plat.
The Homeowners Association shall be required to maintain all common space in
reasonable order and condition on a timely, consistent basis-
C. The Preliminary Plan for the Planned Unit Development District shall show. !
� The scale and north point. fit, TVpvL
4:=1+� Boundaries of the property to be developed.— Prs"'dG pjw., ~' ° Su rY�
'( The names of the owners of the property and the individual or firm responsible for the< -
preparation of the Preliminary Plan.
® The existing zoning of the tract and the zoning of properties which are within 200 feet of the
boundaries of the property. -- Prn v • dt 0,4 P /AH
(mil, The location, type and size of structures, on properties within 200 feet of the boundaries of
the property. — Mmoo . da o n P 4% n .
Acreage of the property to be included in the Planned District. �"
Existing contours on an interval of not more than five feet and not less than two feet. 5e41
t,8 The location and direction of drainage of all water courses and a drainage plan with y3p fwS
sufficient information to indicate the intent of the owner. Gin P /s-►�
9� The location of existing and proposed sanitary sewers. rr.wr�C - pP
t1rJ) The proposed size, location, height, use and arrangement of all buildings except singte-
familyamily dwellings; the location and capacity of off-street parking areas, entrance and exit
driveways and their relationship to existing and proposed streets; building lines; easements;
common land and open space; and proposed streets, alleys and pedestrian ways.
—j4-4 Proposed landscaping and buffer zones, 5eC. irolt-F a" fit"^ rtiRr�- vP
h/ct ( Provide for the dedication of any right-of-way for the vridening, extension or connection of
major streets as shown in the Thoroughfare Plan.
(i 3 Date and signature lines for execution by the Commission Chairman and theppirector of
Community Development to show the date of Plan approval. -- P, o ~ 1c o.. Pto,
d. A PUD Preliminary Plan shall:
(1) Comply with the criteria established in Section 35.27, as well as the criteria for rezoning,
Section 35-74.6.4 and Preliminary Plat approval in the Subdivision Code.
(2) Comply with the approved Concept Plan, if applicable; and
(3) Establish the underlying zoning, mix of uses, density, layout, design and phasing of the
proposed Planned Unit Development.
e. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the application at a public hearing in
conformance with Section 35-70 and shall make recommendations to the Council, The Council
Page 4 of 7
Coorespondence/Timeline Packet
Page 10
IC*K, Al(
(yam
Coorespondence/Timeline Packet
Page 11
From: Jeff <jwschae@hotmail.com>
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 10:22 AM
To: Wade, Shane <SWade@jeffcitymo.org>
Cc: Zollinger, Ian <IZollinger@jeffcitymo.org>; Barron, Eric <EBarron@jeffcitymo.org>; Nanoski, Ahnna
<ANanoski@jeffcitymo.org>
Subject: Fwd: Three Story Coffee - Site Plan & Floor Plan
Shane: The amended PDFs are attached. I am away from my computer and on my phone and only could cc
Eric, Ian and Ahnna from my phone. Could you forward to the others on your end? And confirm receipt?
If you print these on 11 x 17, they are more legible, although the scale changes on one of them, I think.
I do have them printed already, but won't be back in JC until tomorrow to drop them off with Ellen. I will get you
an 11 x 17 of each in the morning.
Please let me know if the attachments do not come through or if anyone has questions. My number is
+15733017514.
Jeff
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Scott Schaeperkoetter" <Scott@signaturehomesic.com>
To: "Jeff Schaeperkoetter11 <iwschae@hotmail.com>
Subject: Three Story Coffee - Site Plan & Floor Plan - with logo
Scott Schaeperkoetter
Signature Homes Inc. - Owner
Scott@signaturehomesic.com
(573) 690-4377 - Cell
(573) 761-3898 — Fax
aa�axw� reorrvrxt uc
i
i
it 1� 11."IN,; ♦ 1 1,"Y e
l l.ltxat�a a.11. Vlfa�l .t. �. �•••— "
Coorespondence/Timeline Packet
Page 12
From: Jeff <jwschae@hotmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2020 10:59 AM
To: Moehlman, Ryan <RMoehlman@jeffcitymo.org>
Cc: Barron, Eric <EBarron@jeffcitymo.org>; Schofield, Matt <MSchofield@jeffcitymo.org>; Turner, Jason
<JTurner@jeffcitymo.org>; Graham, Carlos <CGraham@jeffcitymo.org>
Subject: Re: Bolivar & McCarty PUD
Thank you, Ryan, and the whole group for helping to get this to the finish line before the Council on Monday
evening.
Jeff
From: Moehlman, Ryan <RMoehlman@ieffcitymo.org>
Sent: Monday, October 19, 2020 3:31 PM
To: 'Jeff' <iwschae@hotmail.com>
Cc: Barron, Eric <EBarron@ieffcitymo.org>; Schofield, Matt <MSchofield@ieffcitymo.org>; Turner, Jason
<JTurner@ieffcitymo.org>; Graham, Carlos <CGraham@ieffcitymo.org>
Subject: RE: Bolivar & McCarty PUD
Sounds good. I'll draw it up.
Ryan .\. Lloehlman. Cit, Attorne_%
City of .letlerson. Mis ouri
(573) 634-631-'
RMoehlman c leffcitvmo.ore
From: Jeff [mailto:jwschae(a)hotmail.coml
Sent: Monday, October 19, 2020 10:40 AM
To: Moehlman, Ryan
Cc: Barron, Eric; Schofield, Matt; Turner, Jason; Graham, Carlos
Subject: Re: Bolivar & McCarty PUD
Ryan: I am okay with removing the new language about the alley if # 3 in the second list is removed and the rest
renumbered.
Jeff
Sent from my Whone
On Oct 19, 2020, at 8:26 AM, Moehlman, Ryan <RMoehhnangieffcitymo.org> wrote:
Mr Schaeperkoetter:
This language is acceptable to me, except for the first long addition in red. I do not know the history of the alley,
but if part of the pavement has been on the property long enough, then that pavement may have become part of the
public right of way by prescriptive use.
If the remainder of the language is sufficient for you, then I will draft a bill amendment. If this needs further
discussion, then I suggest that the bill sponsor should place the bill on the informal calendar until the November
meeting so we have more time to discuss.
I will run this by planning and fire staff and the bill sponsor.
Coorespondence/Timeline Packet
Page 13
Thank you.
-Ryan
Sent from my Sprint Samsun* Galaxy S 10.
-------- Original message --------
From: Jeff <jwschae�hotmail.com>
Date: 10/18/20 9:15 PM (GMT-06:00)
To: "Moehlman, Ryan" <RMoehlman car jeffcit mo.org>
Cc: "Barron, Eric" <EBarron_ac'e� ffcitymo.ory>, "Schofield, Matt" <MSchofieldajeffcitymo•org>, "Turner, Jason"
<JTurner a,ieffcitymo.org>, "Graham, Carlos" <CGraham(a,ieffcit�.org>
Subject: Re: Bolivar & McCarty PUD
Ryan: In the absence of a response to my Friday evening e-mail, I thought I should get this to you before the
weekend was over. Your proposed language leaves way too many questions unanswered, which I set forth in the
preceding e-mail, so I undertook to resolve those issues with the following. Your altered language is in black, my
new language is in red.
The public alleyway known as "W. Wall Way" (the "alleyway") shall be designated as "no parking"
from the intersection of the alleyway and Bolivar St. to the eastern property line of the subject
property. The alleyway is currently, and has been, at all times previous since its dedication as a
public way in the City of Jefferson, available for the unfettered use of the general public, as well
as the owners of property on both sides of the alleyway, subject only to the traffic code of the City
of Jefferson. The paved portion of the alleyway may currently encroach upon the subject
property. To the extent that a mutually agreed -upon survey of the subject property's north
property line reveals such an encroachment, the City will remove such pavement and relocate the
paving within the alleyway or allow the developer to remove the pavement. The alleyway shall not
be used in the operations of any commercial or residential use on the subject property in that no
owner or occupant of the subject property shall suggest, encourage, or, with knowledge, allow or
permit vendors, customers, tenants, or invitees to park, idle, or block the alleyway at any time.
Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed (1) to prohibit the use of the alleyway for general
vehicular or pedestrian access to the parking lot on the subject property which is directly adjacent
to the alleyway; (2) to prohibit ingress and egress along any point of the alleyway adjacent to the
subject property; (3) to prohibit the unfettered use of the alleyway by the City of Jefferson, as long
as it remains a public way; (4) to prohibit the owner or occupant from trash service pickup along
the alleyway; or (5) to criminalize or otherwise force any vehicular user to not comply with any
traffic regulations of the City of Jefferson, such as stopping at stop signs or yielding to
pedestrians. Neither shall this provision require the owner or occupant of the subject property to
enforce the parking, idling, or blocking restriction in any way other than making a reasonable effort
to obtain voluntary compliance and, if unsuccessful, reporting the suspected violation to the City of
Jefferson for either police or towing action.
We will be on the road first thing in the morning to come home and will have time in the morning to take a call on
the road or to come in and discuss this in the afternoon. Perhaps Chief Schofield or Chief Turner could meet with
us as well.
Jeff
Coorespondence/Timeline Packet
Page 14
From: Jeff <iwschae@hotmail.com>
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2020 8:06 PM
To: Moehlman, Ryan <RMoehlman@ieffcitymo.org>
Cc: Barron, Eric <EBarron@ieffcitymo.org>; Schofield, Matt <MSchofield@ieffcitymo.org>; Turner, Jason
<JTurner@ieffcitymo.org>; Graham, Carlos <CGraham@ieffcitymo.org>
Subject: Re: Bolivar & McCarty PUD
Ryan: Thanks for the modifications. The "allow or permit" language is a bit of a trap. What is the "affirmative
requirement on the business?" if the no parking sign is not sufficient to keep people from parking there, will we
need to put up a sign that says, "Please obey the no parking signs" or, if there is a violator, prove that it was not a
vendor, customer, tenant or invitee of the business?
I totally get the fire department's need to keep its access unfettered. However, it remains a public way of the city,
over which we have no control. Will we be expected to enforce the no parking sign? Is the city considering
additional signage, such as "No Through Street", to discourage the random access to the alley? Or, perhaps,
"Violators will be towed at own expense."
Maybe rather than "allow or permit", the phrase "suggest or encourage" would more accurately describe our
obligation. Or, "with knowledge of the blocking, allow or permit."
Maybe I am making a mountain out of a molehill. But if the burden and penalty for illegal parking on a public way
falls on the owner, the owner's responsibility needs to be clearly set forth. And the City must meet its burden of
adequate signage, active enforcement and response to complaints, and adequate width of the alley
itself. Otherwise, the penalty or punishment (presumably not "essentially small fines") is left totally to the
city. Revocation of a business license? Public censure?
I still believe that the phrase "in that no owner or occupant of the subject property shall allow or permit vendors,
customers, tenants, or invitees to park, idle, or block the alleyway at any time" should be omitted in its entirety
from the proposed substitute. To fail to do so exposes the development to an unreasonable risk of violation. The
remaining language adequately requires us to constrain our operations to the limits of our property, which we' are
and will be committed to. Coincidentally, your current proposed language would apply to trash service by its very
terms, notwithstanding the elimination of the previous trash service limitation.
Jeff
From: Moehlman, Ryan <RMoehlman@ieffcitymo.org>
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2020 4:48 PM
To: 'Jeff' <iwschae@hotmail.com>
Cc: Barron, Eric <EBarron@ieffcitymo.org>; Schofield, Matt <MSchofield@ieffcitymo.org>; Turner, Jason
<1Turner@ieffcitymo.org>; Graham, Carlos <CGraham@ieffcitymo.org>
Subject: RE: Bolivar & McCarty PUD
I appreciate your comments and have narrowed some of the language accordingly. I must keep some language imposing an
affirmative requirement on the business to help keep customers, vendors, etc from parking in the alley. The fire department
believes that this is important enough that the punishments of the parking code (essentially small fines) are not enough to
effectively prevent the behavior that needs to be avoided.
Coorespondence/Timeline Packet
Page 15
I have verified the location of Station 1's dumpster and removed the restriction on trash service.
The amended language is as follows:
The public alleyway known as "W. Wall Way" (the "alleyway") shall be designated as "no parking"
from the intersection of the alleyway and Bolivar St. to the eastern property line of the subject
property. The alleyway shall not be used in the operations of any commercial or residential use
on the subject property in that no owner or occupant of the subject property shall allow or permit
vendors, customers, tenants, or invitees to park, idle, or block the alleyway at any time. Nothing in
this paragraph shall be construed to prohibit the use of the alleyway for general vehicular or
pedestrian access to the parking lot on the subject property which is directly adjacent to the
alleyway.
Thanks
Rear, A. Al��chlnr,i�_ C�i_�, At1��rn��
Cite i�(I It�i:xni. ;Ali„nnri
!�73)01-(.i11
RMoehlmanCajeffcitvmo.ore
From: Jeff [mailto:jwschae@hotmail.coml
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2020 4:01 PM
To: Moehlman, Ryan
Cc: Barron, Eric; Schofield, Matt; Turner, Jason; Graham, Carlos
Subject: Re: Bolivar & McCarty PUD
Ryan: Thanks for your note. As you know, I am out of state and in a location where wi-fi access is sketchy. I will
return Monday in time for the council meeting, but the late arrival of this issue may limit my ability to
respond. My ability to talk with others by phone is very limited.
This issue, though, was the subject of a meeting I had with Chief Turner prior to the P & Z meeting. I assured Chief
Turner that we would take all possible steps to ensure the accessibility of the alleyway. We reduced the size of
the back parking area specifically because we thought Chief Turner's expressed concerns were appropriate from
the fire department's perspective.
And, while I have no problems with the intent of this suggested language, it may go further that is required. For
instance, I have noted that the fire station's trash container is located down this same alley. I assume without
really knowing that the trash container is accessed by the trash company down that alley. If that is the case,
presumably the trash company would make both pickups on the same trip. Would the fire department consider
allowing our location to use its currently -existing trash containers or locate our trash container next to yours? If
not, the language would require us to locate the trash containers at the front of the building, which is neither
aesthetically nor olfactorily desirable.
We do not intend to use the alley for operational purposes. I should note, however, that the surveyed property
line indicates that about 4 of the alley's current paved surface actually encroaches on our property. That part of
the surface will need to be removed for placement of the retaining wall along that boundary line.
The "or other obstruction" seems a little vague to my lawyerly mind. Frankly, the provisions of the City Code in
Art. 1, Section 22, seem to adequately control the parking on a public way. If the only purpose of the new
language is to make the developer and the located business subject to penalty or required for enforcement, then I
would propose the following alternative language, which shows your original proposed language, with lined -
through portions:
Coorespondence/Timeline Packet
Page 16
No
ll
r idling, bleeking, "
"alleyway")
may. The alleyway shall not be used in the operations of any commercial or residential use on the subject property,
E neluding that ne 9wReF E)F eeeupant efthe subjeet PFGpeFty shall allow or peRnit veRdeFs, eusterriers, teRants, er invitees te
-,.I. r idle, hleek r ., eth.,Fwir„ tebstri.ir-t thy, alleyway at y time Solid Waste „iek r s fee the subj et „ eFty shall
net „eFFnitted t„ use the „„hlie alleyway t„ provide such seFviG Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to prohibit
the use of the alleyway for general vehicular or pedestrian access to the parking lot located on the ReFtheast (northwest)
side of the subject property.
Let me know your thoughts.
Jeff
From: Moehlman, Ryan <RMoehlman@ieffcitymo.org>
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2020 11:33 AM
To: 'Jeff' <iwschae@hotmail.com>
Cc: Barron, Eric <EBarron@ieffcitymo.org>; Schofield, Matt <MSchofield@ieffcitymo.org>; Turner, Jason
<JTurner@ieffcitymo.org>; Graham, Carlos <CGraham@ieffcitymo.org>
Subject: Bolivar & McCarty PUD
Mr. Schaeperkoetter:
Myself and Planning Staff have been in discussions with the Fire Department on how to mitigate potential negative impacts
on emergency operations at Fire Station 1. We have come up with a solution of affirmatively marking the W. Wall Way alley
as no parking and including the following operation guideline in the ordinance approving the PUD plan. Essentially it
prohibits the business and apartment on the property from using the alley as part of its operations (i.e., vendor deliveries,
customers idling in the alley to pop in and grab a quick cup of coffee, trash service, etc.) so the alley will be kept clear 24/7
for emergency vehicles. We have little doubt that you and your family would be great neighbors to the Fire Station and
100% helpful in making sure important emergency services are not impacted, but we must make sure that any future
owners/occupants would be equally as helpful. The paragraph we would add to do so reads as follows:
No parking, idling, blocking, or other obstruction shall be allowed at any time in the public alleyway known as "W.
Wall Way" (the "alleyway") from the intersection of the alleyway and Bolivar St. to the eastern property line of the
subject property. The alleyway shall not be used in the operations of any commercial or residential use on the
subject property, including that no owner or occupant of the subject property shall allow or permit vendors,
customers, tenants, or invitees to park, idle, block, or otherwise obstruct the alleyway at any time. Solid Waste pick
up services for the subject property shall not permitted to use the public alleyway to provide such services. Nothing
in this paragraph shall be construed to prohibit the use of the alleyway for general vehicular or pedestrian access to
the parking lot located on the northeast side of the subject property.
It is staff's intent to offer this language as part of a substitute bill on Monday night. Please let us know if you have any
questions on this matter. Thank you.
-Ryan
RN an A. Moehlman
Cite Attorne,
City of.lefferson. Missouri
Off -ice: (573) 634-6314
RMoehlman 0aJeffcitvmo.ore
This communication may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If it has been sent to you in error. please contact the sender for
instructions concernimc, return or destruction. and do not use or disclose the contents to others.
Coorespondence/Timeline Packet
Page 17
From: Paul Samson <psamson@cmps-inc.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 8, 2021 9:50 AM
To: Barron, Eric <EBarron@jeffcitymo.org>
Subject: RE: PUD Plan - 311 Bolivar Street
Eric,
Thanks for the call this morning. I talked to Jeff and we are going to send Jason a plan and meet with
them to get any issues worked out. Hopefully we will have a resolution by the end of next week.
Paul Samson, PE
Central Missouri Professional Services, Inc.
2500 E. McCarty St.
Jefferson City, MO 65101
Phone: 573-634-3455
Fax: 573-634-8898
psamson@cmps-inc.com
From: Barron, Eric <EBarron@ieffcitymo.org
Sent: Thursday, April 8, 20218:27 AM
To: Paul Samson <psamson@cmps-inc.com>
Subject: PUD Plan - 311 Bolivar Street
Eric Barron
Planning Manager
City of Jefferson
(573) 634-6419
Coorespondence/Timeline Packet
Page 18
From: Paul Samson <psamson@cmps-inc.com>
Sent: Friday, April 9, 20212:29 PM
To: Barron, Eric <EBarron@jeffcitymo.org>
Subject: Bolivar St. Site Plan
Eric,
I spoke with Jeff and he is good with the changes we discussed. I will send down revised drawings for
Sheet C100 on Monday.
Paul Samson, PE
Central Missouri Professional Services, Inc.
2500 E. McCarty St.
Jefferson City, MO 65101
Phone: 573-634-3455
Fax: 573-634-8898
psamson@cmps-inc.com
Coorespondencerrimeline Packet
Page 19
From: Barron, Eric
Sent: Thursday, May 6, 2021 9:07 AM
To: Wade, Shane <SWade@jeffcitymo.org>;'psamson@cmps-inc.com' <psamson@cmps-inc.com>
Cc: Kreyling, Matt <MKreyling@jeffcitymo.org>; Bange, David <DBange@jeffcitymo.org>; Fontana, Don
<DFontana@jeffcitymo.org>; Bonnot, Len <LBonnot@jeffcitymo.org>; Dittmer, Lisa
<Ldittmer@jeffcitymo.org>
Subject: RE: Coffee Shop, B & B, Oakbrook Properties, 309 & 311 Bolivar Street- Plan Review Comments,
Engineering Division, 1st Review
Hello Paul,
The only comment by the Planning Division is to reference the assigned address — 311 Bolivar Street, on
all plan sheets. We assigned a separate street number for the upper level Air BnB unit of 309 Bolivar, so
maybe reference that as well.
Sincerely,
Eric Barron
Planning Manager
City of Jefferson
573-634-6419
From: Wade, Shane
Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 2021 5:08 PM
To:'psamson@cmps-inc.com' <psamson@cmps-inc.com>
Cc: Kreyling, Matt <MKreyling@ieffcitymo.org>; Barron, Eric <EBarron@ieffcitymo.org>; Bange, David
<DBange@ieffcitymo.org>; Fontana, Don <DFontana@ieffcitymo.org>; Bonnot, Len
<LBonnot@ieffcitymo.org>; Dittmer, Lisa <Idittmer@ieffcitymo.org>
Subject: Coffee Shop, B & B, Oakbrook Properties, 309 & 311 Bolivar Street- Plan Review Comments,
Engineering Division, 1st Review
Paul -
Please find below the Plan Review comments from the Engineering Division concerning the
project submittal referenced above, submitted April 20, 2021 for review.
Topo Survey & Demolition, C001, Sheet 1 of 4-
1. Update the address references for all locations on the site plan sheets to 309 & 311
Bolivar Street (all sheets).
Site Plan C100, Sheet 2 of 4-
1. Provide sizes for the water service and meter referenced in Site Notes 8 & 9.
2. Is the proposed signage to be alighted sign? If so, will the building/ electrical
plans reference the location of the electric service to the sign?
3. Do you have a detail or reference to a standard detail, for the 6"raised concrete
island noted in Site Note 24?
4. For Storm Drainage Note P 1-2, the UFL = 574.00 instead of 554.00.
CoorespondencefTimeline Packet
Page 20
5. Drainage calculations and a drainage area map for piping and storm structures
are needed to verify information provided for the storm drainage structures.
Please provide.
Grading & Erosion Control Plan, CI01, Sheet 3 of 4-
1. Provide owner/ maintenance contact information for the swq/ detention basin
shown.
2. Drainage swq calculations and a drainage area map for swq are needed to verify
information provided for the storm drainage structures. Please provide.
3. Is a concrete washout detail needed for the site, if needed? (re: SWQ Benefits List)
Construction Details, C10Z Sheet 4 of 4-
2. See item 3. above for C100.
3. See item 3. above for C101.
DA Map & Drainage Calculations-
1. See items 5. above for C100 and 2. above for C101.
SWQ/ ESC Checklists, Benefits Summary-
1. See items 1. & 3. above for C101.
We have no additional comments. I believe that the Planning Division has reviewed
the plan, and may comment by separate email. Please double-check with Eric Barron.
We will need four (4) sets of the final revised plan for final approval/ resubmittal.
Thanks.
Shane Wade
Shane Wade, P.E.
Plan Review and Development Engineer
City of Jefferson Dept. of Public Works
Engineering Division
573.634.6449 0
573.634.6457 F
swadeCa) ieffcitymo.ors
CoorespondencelTimeline Packet
Page 21
From: Jeff Schaeperkoetter <jwschae@hotmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2021 2:55 PM
To: Barron, Eric <EBarron@jeffcitymo.org>
Cc: Wade, Shane <SWade@jeffcitymo.org>
Subject: Re: Tract division application
Thanks, Eric.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 24, 2021, at 1:35 PM, Barron, Eric <EBarron@ieffcitymo.org wrote:
Hello Jeff,
Yes, the proposed tract division has be received, distributed, and is currently in process of review.
We have been inundated lately with plan reviews of various sorts, but your submittal should be at or near the top of our
first in/first out process.
Sincerely,
Eric Barron
Planning Manager
City of Jefferson
573-634-6419
From: Jeff Schaeperkoetter <Iwschae@hotmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2021 10:13 AM
To: Barron, Eric <EBarron(c@ieffcitymo.org>
Subject: Tract division application
Eric: CMPS submitted the tract division application on June 7th. I have a contract with Union Pacific that is time -
sensitive, and I don't want this to fall between the cracks. Sorry to bother you with this, but could you check and make
sure this has come to the attention of the right people?
Jeff
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
CoorespondencelTimeline Packet
Page 22
From: Jeff Schaeperkoetter <jwschae@hotmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2021 9:58 PM
To: Barron, Eric <EBarron@jeffcitymo.org>
Cc: Wade, Shane <SWade@jeffcitymo.org>; dsmith@cmps-inc.com; brockwell@cmps-inc.com; Barge,
David <DBange@jeffcitymo.org>; Bonnot, Len <LBonnot@jeffcitymo.org>; Dittmer, Lisa
<Idittmer@ jeffcitymo.org>
Subject: Re: Property Boundary and Tract Division Survey 600 block of West McCarty Street, - Plan
Review Comments, Engineering and Planning Divisions, 1st Review
Thanks, Eric, that makes sense. I will get back with you tomorrow on this after talking with Darrell about
the standard language they have.
Jeff
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 15, 2021, at 9:18 PM, Barron, Eric <EBarron(c?ieffcitymo.ore> wrote:
Hello Jeff,
The note is meant to recognize that the tract does not qualify as an individual buildable lot (as it, by
itself, does not have street frontage - alley access does not qualify as street frontage).
It is not meant to state that nothing could be built on it. It can be used for future expansion by you - as
your adjacent property does have street frontage.
The city code section is: 35-50.C.1- all lots must have access on a dedicated public street.
The note should probably be a bit longer, perhaps reading as:
This tract does not qualify as an individual buildable lot, and is intended to be transferred and combined
with the neighboring tract recorded in Book _, Page A tract must meet city code requirements
to qualify as a buildable lot.
CMPS has a standard note (similarto the above) that they put on parcel divisions. This one was missing
that note, hence the staff comment.
The purpose of course is to keep from any misunderstandings - we wouldn't want a future property
owner to come in wanting to build something on a landlocked lot.
If there's an issue with the language we can of course talk about that, but we need either a note to this
effect, or, to include your tract in the survey and formally combine them so they'd be a single tract
(which would greatly complicate things). I think I mentioned the note at our discussion at the front
desk. Again, it's not meant to keep you from building on and using the property, it's meant to keep you
from selling it individually off to someone else who would then want to build on it (with only alley
access).
If you have any questions I'm happy to discuss.
Sincerely,
Eric Barron
Planning Manager
City of Jefferson
573-634-6419
On Jul 15, 2021, at 8:03 PM, Jeff Schaeperkoetter <iwschae@hotmail.com> wrote:
Coorespondence/Timeline Packet
Page 23
Shane: Thanks for sending this to me, but I am perplexed about Comment 5 from the Planning
Department.
Although I mentioned this to Eric in a pre -application meeting, perhaps it was not clear from the
application that Oakbrook Properties, L.L.C., has the contract with the railroad, and this property,
obviously, adjoins our current property to the west which we are developing. If the new area does not
qualify as a building site, I need to know what the qualifications are immediately so I can address that
with the railroad. That limitation is certainly unexpected and will have a significant impact on our
transaction. We have a closing date coming up in early August, and I need to know what disqualifies this
new tract and what, if any, remediations are available that might change that. A reference to the City
Code would be helpful to me.
Would you please ask the Planning Department commenter to reply to me as quickly as possible?
I know that Darrell of CMPS has questions about Comment 1 as well. On that one, I guess I am confused
about why I am having to bear the expense of showing the detail on an adjoining tract which is not a
part of the tract division application. Could the existing detail on that adjoining lot be omitted like it is
on the fire station property?
Jeff
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++++++++++++
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Wade, Shane
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2021 10:26 AM
To: dsmith@cmps-inc.com; Brian Rockwell <brockwell@cmps-inc.com> (brockwell cmps-inc.com)
Cc: Barron, Eric; Bange, David; Bonnot, Len; Dittmer, Lisa;'iwschae@hotmail.com'
Subject: Property Boundary and Tract Division Survey 600 block of West McCarty Street, - Plan Review
Comments, Engineering and Planning Divisions, 1st Review
Darrel and Brian -
Please find below the Plan Review comments from the Engineering and Planning Divisions concerning
the
survey submittal referenced above, submitted June 8, 2021 for review.
Parcel Division Survey-
1. For the adjacent property at 620 West McCarty, please update what is shown for the building
and
for the parking area. A building expansion and parking area expansion has occurred for this
property,
since the previous survey was performed in 2002.
Recent aerial photography should show updated layouts.
Coorespondence/Timeline Packet
Page 24
The dimension offset from the back property line will change due to the fairly recent building
addition.
Label the building on the adjacent property as a "restaurant".
2. Provide a vicinity map for the survey.
3. Please remove "GISP" from the signature block for Sonny Sanders signature.
4. In the title block, the owner referenced should be Union Pacific instead of Mo. Pacific Railroad.
Please clarify.
5. Please add an additional note that "Tract B-1 does not qualify as an individual building lot" to
the
survey notes on the drawing (Planning Division comment).
6. Label the dimension N 42d 14m39s E 1.33' in similar fashion to all other property dimensions
for
Tract B-2.
We have no additional comments.
Please resubmit at least two (2) original revised documents addressing the comments above, along
with the recording fee for the final submittal.
Let us know if you have any questions concerning the comments.
Thanks.
Shane Wade
Shane Wade, P.E.
Plan Review and Development Engineer
City of Jefferson Dept. of Public Works
Engineering Division
573.634.6449 0
573.634.6457 F
swade@ieffcitymo.org
Coorespondence/Timeline Packet
Page 25
From: Jeff Schaeperkoetter <jwschae@hotmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2022 9:07 AM
To: Barron, Eric <EBarron@jeffersoncitymo.gov>
Subject: Re: 309 Bolivar - Parking off of Alley
Eric: Thanks for your note. I am aware, of course, of the fire department's concerns and certainly plan to talk to
Chief Schofield before any request is submitted.
Jeff
Sent from my iPhone
On May 18, 2022, at 8:05 AM, Barron, Eric <EBarron@ieffersoncitymo.eov> wrote:
Hello Jeff, thank you for the reply.
The Fire Department has some pretty specific concerns about the alley and the parking off of it, which were
flushed out during the PUD review process and subsequent adoption of that plan by the City Council.
You can propose changes, but I'm not sure we're going to be able to process them administratively given that
they were fairly specific items incorporated into the plan sent to Council.
If you have a proposal in mind, you can send it to me and we'll distribute it for review/comment. Alternatively
you could discuss any ideas you have directly with the Fire Department.
Barring approval of a revised plan, it would be expected that the parking adjacent to the alley would be installed
according to the approved plan, including installation of the missing island. We wouldn't be in a position to issue
a certificate of occupancy for the building with these plan elements missing.
Sincerely,
Eric Barron
Planning Manager
City of Jefferson
573-634-6419
From: Jeff Schaeperkoetter <iwschae@hotmail.com>
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2022 4:18 PM
To: Barron, Eric <EBarron@ieffersoncitymo.gov>
Subject: RE: 309 Bolivar - Parking off of Alley
Eric: Thanks for the e-mail. I had specifically requested that the concrete island not be installed at the time the
back parking lot was poured. I knew that the front parking lot was going to be a bigger project, and that the
front's completion was weather -dependent, and wanted to maximize on -site parking as much as possible, and
that island's completion would obstruct parking in the rear.
Subsequently, I have considered filing an application to seek approval of an amendment to the final PUD plan to
allow straight -in parking rather than the parking provided for in the final PUD Plan as approved. In reading the
city code, I think this may be a minor amendment as contemplated by the code.
My thinking here is that the additional parking of at least 2 or 3 spaces would be beneficial without significant
impact on the area. I know the City is dealing with parking issues on a much larger scale in the downtown area,
and the long-term benefit of additional on -site parking may be attractive to the City as well.
Coorespondence/Timeline Packet
Page 26
Jeff
Sent from Mail for Windows
From: Barron, Eric<EBarron@ieffersoncitymo.gov>
Sent: Monday, May 16, 2022 8:25:00 AM
To: Jeff Schaeperkoetter <iwschae@hotmail.com>
Subject: 309 Bolivar - Parking off of Alley
Hello Jeff,
I wanted to check in and make sure that the parking arrangement off of the alley at your new building was being
installed according to plan, with 90 degree parking spaces off of a driveway accessed from the alley (rather than
head in parking from the alley).
I realize that the striping is not in yet. The concrete island adjacent to the alley connection to Bolivar (note #24
on the attached plan) doesn't appear to be in place.
- - --- - -
411: LOStTC\' L.P i
--�.
. m.v
Eric Barron
Planning Manager
City of Jefferson
(573) 634-6419
Coorespondence/Timeline Packet
Page 27
From: Jeff Schaeperkoetter <jwschae@hotmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, June 5, 2022 6:05 PM
To: Schofield, Matt <MSchofield @jeffersoncitymo.gov>; Barron, Eric <EBarron@jeffersoncitymo.gov>
Cc: Scott Schaeperkoetter <Scott@signaturehomesjc.com>; Turner, Jason <JTurner@jeffersoncitymo.gov>
Subject: RE: Parking area at rear of new building
Chief Schofield and Eric: We are looking to a completion of the building later on this month, and I am getting
nervous that the parking issue is still out there without a resolution. I will be heading out of town Thursday for
a few days. Could I hear from somebody on Monday to see where we are on this?
Jeff
Sent from Mail for Windows
From: Schofield, Matt
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2022 6:52 PM
To: Jeff Schaeperkoetter
Cc: Scott Schaeperkoetter: Turner, Jason
Subject: Re: Parking area at rear of new building
Let's look to early next week, how does 1:30 on Tuesday sound?
Sent from my iPhone
On May 25, 2022, at 8:00 AM, Jeff Schaeperkoetter <iwschae@hotmail.com> wrote:
Anytime today or tomorrow, then on Friday before 9 or after 3.
Sent from my iPhone
On May 25, 2022, at 7:55 AM, Schofield, Matt <MSchofield @ieffersoncitymo.gov> wrote:
Mr. Schaeperkoetter,
Our schedule is tight this week, what time were you thinking?
Matthew D. Schofield, Fire Chief
Jefferson City Fire Department
City of Jefferson, Missouri
mschofield@ieffersoncitymo.gov
573-634-6401
15S WC 7216169721
This e-mail transmission, and any documents, files or previous e-mail messages attached to it contains
information that is confidential, and may be legally privileged, and is intended for the use of the individual or
entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, printing, distribution or use of any of the information contained in
or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you have received this transmission in error, please
immediately notify the sender by telephone or return e-mail and delete the original transmission and its
attachments without reading or saving in any manner. Thank you
From: Jeff Schaeperkoetter <iwschae@hotmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2022 8:01 PM
To: Schofield, Matt <MSchofield@ieffersoncitymo.gov>
Cc: Scott Schaeperkoetter <scott@signaturehomesic.com>
Subject: Parking area at rear of new building
Coorespondence/Timeline Packet
Page 28
Chief Schofield: I was hoping it would be possible to squeeze into your schedule in the next few days what I
think will be a fairly short meeting at the job site, regarding a matter of some urgency. Before that meeting, I
thought it would be more efficient to lay out my thoughts via this e-mail.
You may recall that the parking area for our new building between the building and Wall Way was formatted in
the PUD Plan approved by the City so that the 4 parking spaces there would be oriented parallel with Wall
Way. The fire department had expressed concerns regarding potential obstructions to the department's use of
Wall Way.
As that back parking lot was being poured, and in an attempt to facilitate on -site parking during the
construction of the front parking lot, I asked that the back lot not be finished with that small island along Wall
Way at the entrance from Bolivar, as provided in the Final site plan.
That back parking lot is 26 feet deep from the sidewalk to Wall Way, which is, as I am told, 7 feet more than the
19 feet typically required. As a result, if vehicles were allowed to park back there perpendicular to the building
(straight -in parking), they would have that extra room to back out and access Wall Way for their exit.
That area is wide enough, even with the wider space required for the one handicapped space, to permit 7 or 8
spaces, which is 3 or 4 more than those which will be available with the approved parking plan.
We would limit the use of that back parking lot to employees and the occasional users of the AirBnB so that
the use of the lot will be for those who will not be in and out of the lot frequently. Signage will be developed
to restrict customers from using the lot. Deliveries will be made through the front parking area. I believe
that the perpendicular orientation of the parking will not adversely impact the fire department's access to or
use of Wall Way to a greater extent than that which will occur with the plan as approved. The change will
allow additional on -site parking, which will reduce street parking in the area and the resulting impact on
vehicular, pedestrian and cycling users. Additionally, it will enhance the parking for our project.
The request for an amendment to the final plan can be approved administratively, and, of course, the City will
not consider that as long as the fire department maintains its position. Because of the imminent completion of
the building (we hope to have it done in the next month or so), the City will also not issue a certificate of
occupancy until the back parking lot and the rest of the improvements are completed according to the
plan. The completion of the small island and striping the lot per the approved plan can be done quickly, now
that the front parking lot and apron are completed.
I thought I would reach back out to you to see if the department's concerns are somehow alleviated by this
lengthy explanation. If that were the case, your assistance in passing that along to Eric Barron might be the
next step, as I think the administrative approval of the amendment can occur pretty quickly. Of course, if that
is not the case, I will not be filing the request for amendment.
Chief, I understand the department's expressed concerns, and your position on this will not diminish my
appreciation for the department's cooperation as we have moved along here. I just thought it was important
to at least give you my thoughts.
My telephone number is 573-301-7514 and I will be available any time Wednesday and Thursday, with some
limited time as well on Friday. I hope you are willing to meet me up there, so we can show you "on the
ground" the specifics of the request. You may want Chief Turner to be there as well.
Jeff
Sent from Mail for Windows
Coorespondence/Timeline Packet
Page 29
From: Jeff Schaeperkoetter <jwschae@hotmail.com>
Sent: Friday, June 3, 2022 4:01 PM
To: Barron, Eric <EBarron@jeffersoncitymo.gov>
Subject: RE: Project
Thanks, Eric.
Sent from Mail for Windows
From: Barron, Eric
Sent: Friday, June 3, 2022 3:54 PM
To: Jeff Schaeperkoetter
Subject: RE: Project
Hello Jeff,
Yes, a sign permit is still required.
Sign permit applications are available online at:
https://cros4files.revize.com/ieffersoncitymo/PPS/Sign%2ODisplay%20App%202022.pdf
They are processed by the Building Regulations Division, and can be submitted to the permit technician
at the front desk in a similar manner as bundling permit applications.
Sincerely,
Eric Barron
Planning Manager
City of Jefferson
573-634-6419
From: Jeff Schaeperkoetter <iwschae@hotmail.com>
Sent: Friday, June 3, 2022 3:51 PM
To: Barron, Eric <EBarron@ieffersoncitymo.gov>
Subject: Project
I spoke with the fire department on Tuesday and they were going to get with you to discuss next steps
for the parking.
On another matter, please advise if, since the sign was part of the approved site plan, an application for
a sign permit is required. This may be in another person's domain, if so, please forward this to them.
Jeff
Sent from Mail for Windows
Coorespondencerrimeline Packet
Page 30
From: Schofield, Matt <MSchofield@jeffersoncitymo.gov>
Sent: Monday, June 6, 2022 6:30 PM
To: Jeff Schaeperkoetter <jwschae@hotmail.com>
Cc: Barron, Eric <EBarron@jeffersoncitymo.gov>; Scott Schaeperkoetter
<scott@signaturehomesjc.com>; Turner, Jason <1Turner@jeffersoncitymo.gov>
Subject: Re: Parking area at rear of new building
On May 31, Fire Department representatives met with Jeff Schaeperkoetter to review the request for
additional parking of seven or more spaces with future parking needs considered towards the East side
of the property and elimination of the curb originally agreed to in the PUD. The Fire Department is
concerned this will create additional static and transient traffic that will limit access on the dead-end
alley and restrict emergency vehicles, as well as interfere with required access to the communications
tower site at Fire Station 1.
After careful consideration of the information provided on the request for additional parking already
constructed at the rear of Three Story Coffee the Fire Department believes that the Final PUD site plan
approved on 7-9-2021 already represents a substantial compromise on the part of the Fire Department
that takes into account the concerns noted above. It is not in the interest of the public that we serve to
further complicate traffic congestion in this limited access area.
Matthew D. Schofield, Fire Chief
Jefferson City Fire Department
City of Jefferson, Missouri
mschofield@ieffersoncitymo.gov
573-634-6401
15S WC 7216169721
This e-mail transmission, and any documents, files or previous e-mail messages attached to it contains
information that is confidential, and may be legally privileged, and is intended for the use of the
individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for
delivering it to the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, printing, distribution or use of any of the
information contained in or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you have received
this transmission in error, please immediately notify the sender by telephone or return e-mail and
delete the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in any manner. Thank you
On Jun 5, 2022, at 6:05 PM, Jeff Schaeperkoetter <iwschae@hotmail.com> wrote:
Chief Schofield and Eric: We are looking to a completion of the building later on this month, and I am
getting nervous that the parking issue is still out there without a resolution. I will be heading out of
town Thursday for a few days. Could I hear from somebody on Monday to see where we are on this?
Jeff
Sent from Mail for Windows
From: Schofield, Matt
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2022 6:52 PM
To: Jeff Schaeperkoetter
Cc: Scott Schaeperkoetter: Turner, Jason
Subject: Re: Parking area at rear of new building
Let's look to early next week, how does 1:30 on Tuesday sound?
Sent from my iPhone Coorespondencerrimeline Packet
Page 31
On May 25, 2022, at 8:00 AM, Jeff Schaeperkoetter <jwschae@hotmail.com> wrote:
Anytime today or tomorrow, then on Friday before 9 or after 3.
Sent from my iPhone
On May 25, 2022, at 7:55 AM, Schofield, Matt <MSchofield @ieffersoncitymo.gov> wrote:
Mr. Schaeperkoetter,
Our schedule is tight this week, what time were you thinking?
Matthew D. Schofield, Fire Chief
Jefferson City Fire Department
City of Jefferson, Missouri
mschofield@ieffersoncitymo.gov
573-634-6401
15S WC 72161 69721
This e-mail transmission, and any documents, files or previous e-mail messages attached to it contains
information that is confidential, and may be legally privileged, and is intended for the use of the
individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for
delivering it to the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, printing, distribution or use of any of the
information contained in or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you have received
this transmission in error, please immediately notify the sender by telephone or return e-mail and
delete the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in any manner. Thank you
From: Jeff Schaeperkoetter <iwschae@hotmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2022 8:01 PM
To: Schofield, Matt <MSchofield@ieffersoncitymo.gov>
Cc: Scott Schaeperkoetter <scott@signaturehomesic.com>
Subject: Parking area at rear of new building
Chief Schofield: I was hoping it would be possible to squeeze into your schedule in the next few days
what I think will be a fairly short meeting at the job site, regarding a matter of some urgency. Before
that meeting, I thought it would be more efficient to lay out my thoughts via this e-mail.
You may recall that the parking area for our new building between the building and Wall Way was
formatted in the PUD Plan approved by the City so that the 4 parking spaces there would be oriented
parallel with Wall Way. The fire department had expressed concerns regarding potential obstructions to
the department's use of Wall Way.
As that back parking lot was being poured, and in an attempt to facilitate on -site parking during the
construction of the front parking lot, I asked that the back lot not be finished with that small island along
Wall Way at the entrance from Bolivar, as provided in the Final site plan.
That back parking lot is 26 feet deep from the sidewalk to Wall Way, which is, as I am told, 7 feet more
than the 19 feet typically required. As a result, if vehicles were allowed to park back there
perpendicular to the building (straight -in parking), they would have that extra room to back out and
access Wall Way for their exit.
Coorespondence/Timeline Packet
Page 32
That area is wide enough, even with the wider space required for the one handicapped space, to permit
7 or 8 spaces, which is 3 or 4 more than those which will be available with the approved parking plan.
We would limit the use of that back parking lot to employees and the occasional users of the AirBnB
so that the use of the lot will be for those who will not be in and out of the lot frequently. Signage will
be developed to restrict customers from using the lot. Deliveries will be made through the front
parking area I believe that the perpendicular orientation of the parking will not adversely impact the
fire department's access to or use of Wall Way to a greater extent than that which will occur with the
plan as approved. The change will allow additional on -site parking which will reduce street parking in
the area and the resulting impact on vehicular, pedestrian and cycling users. Additionally, it will
enhance the parking for our project.
The request for an amendment to the final plan can be approved administratively, and, of course, the
City will not consider that as long as the fire department maintains its position. Because of the
imminent completion of the building (we hope to have it done in the next month or so), the City will also
not issue a certificate of occupancy until the back parking lot and the rest of the improvements are
completed according to the plan. The completion of the small island and striping the lot per the
approved plan can be done quickly, now that the front parking lot and apron are completed.
I thought I would reach back out to you to see if the department's concerns are somehow alleviated by
this lengthy explanation. If that were the case, your assistance in passing that along to Eric Barron might
be the next step, as I think the administrative approval of the amendment can occur pretty quickly. Of
course, if that is not the case, I will not be filing the request for amendment.
Chief, I understand the department's expressed concerns, and your position on this will not diminish my
appreciation for the department's cooperation as we have moved along here. I just thought it was
important to at least give you my thoughts.
My telephone number is 573-301-7514 and I will be available any time Wednesday and Thursday, with
some limited time as well on Friday. I hope you are willing to meet me up there, so we can show you
"on the ground" the specifics of the request. You may want Chief Turner to be there as well.
Jeff
Sent from Mail for Windows
Coorespondence/Timeline Packet
Page 33
From: Jeff Schaeperkoetter <jwschae@hotmail.com>
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2022 10:22 PM
To: Barron, Eric <EBarron@jeffersoncitymo.gov>
Cc: Scott Schaeperkoetter <scott@signaturehomesjc.com>
Subject: RE: 3-Story Coffee - request for Temporary CO
Eric: Thanks for your note. I apologize for the late response, but I first saw this when I was at the St.
Louis airport picking up family in for the holidays, and am just now getting to my computer. I wanted
you to have this response when you arrive in the morning to emphasize the importance of the request
that Scott has made.
I was aware that Scott had requested the temporary certificate of occupancy last week, and that you
were not back in the office until today. I know that Scott made the request because he was told by city
personnel that temporary certificates had been granted by the City in similar circumstances. I think you
may be aware that the request was for the ground floor of the building, which is complete, while the
upper story portion of the building can be completed within the 45-day period of the temporary
certificate.
The issuance of the temporary certificate is critical. The business to be located on that main floor closed
its location on Dunklin Street on Saturday so that the equipment could be relocated to the new building
and connected for its use on opening. That opening has been planned for Wednesday, which gives us
tomorrow to get the temporary certificate in place.
The back parking lot can not easily be finished at this point because the dumpster needs to remain in
place for debris removal purposes, and trucks with trailers will need access to the rear of the building
through which second floor completion with be accomplished.
I want to make it clear that we will be requesting that the City approve an amendment to the final PUD
Plan, through whatever process the City deems necessary, to provide for increased pull -in parking
spaces in that rear lot. You indicated that I had "no success" with the Fire Department after discussing
this. While they did not agree, I frankly found their basis for that decision to be unreasonable, and I am
not willing to accept the Fire Department as the final authority on the parking amendment
issue. Frankly, it denies my company as the owner of the property the full and unfettered use of a
public street. I know that the City code allows minor amendments to the plan to be approved by staff,
and that staff has apparently relied on the Fire Department to determine that this is not a minor
amendment. If that means that the final decision on the matter must be made through the Planning
and Zoning and City Council process, I am fine with that, even though the City knows that the process of
completing the parking lot according to the current plan will cost me a significant amount of money.
I would respectfully request that the temporary certificate be issued immediately so that occupancy and
operations may commence as planned on Wednesday. If that can not be done, I would like to know by
Tuesday noon, so we can arrange the necessary contractors to finish the parking lot as soon as
possible. That may mean, of course, that those finishes will need to be removed and re -done at our
cost if the amendment to be proposed is accepted by the City Council.
I have cc'd Scott on this. To facilitate our progress, please "reply all".
Jeff
Sent from Mail for Windows
Coorespondence/Timeline Packet
Page 34
From: Barron, Eric
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2022 1:00 PM
To: Jeff Schaeperkoetter
Subject: 3-Story Coffee - request for Temporary CO
Hello Jeff,
We have a request from Scott with Signature Homes for a temporary CO.
We still have the outstanding issue of the rear parking area.
I understand you had discussions with the Fire Department on changes with no success.
Can you state what your plans are for the rear parking area at this point?
Eric Barron
Planning Manager
City of Jefferson
(573) 634-6419
Coorespondence/Timeline Packet
Page 35
From: Jeff Schaeperkoetter <jwschae@hotmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2022 4:25 PM
To: Kreyling, Matt <MKreyling@jeffersoncitymo.gov>
Cc: Scott Schaeperkoetter <Scott@signaturehomesjc.com>; Barron, Eric
<EBarron@jeffersoncitymo.gov>; Sanders, Sonny <SSanders@jeffersoncitymo.gov>; Vande Voorde, Dan
<DVandeVoorde@jeffersoncitymo.gov>
Subject: Re: TCO for Three Story Coffee
Matt: Thanks for getting this done in so timely a fashion for us. We will let Dan know when the roaster
is moved.
Jeff
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 28, 2022, at 3:51 PM, Kreyling, Matt <MKreyling@ieffersoncitymo.gov> wrote:
Jeff,
Attached is the TCO for the lower level at 311 Bolivar for Three Story Coffee to begin operating. Please
be sure to contact our mechanical inspector (Dan VandeVoorde) prior to beginning operation of the
coffee roaster being installed on the west end of the building.
If you have any questions or need anything else, please feel free to call or email at any time.
Matthew Kreyling, CBO
Building Official
City of Jefferson
320 E McCarty Street
Jefferson City, MO 65101
T — (573) 634-6410
m kreyling@ieffersoncitVmo.gov
www.leffe rsoncitVmo.gov
Coorespondence/Timeline Packet
Page 36
0
TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE Or
OCCUPANCY
Department of Planning & Protective Services
Division of Building Regulations
320 East McCarty Street, Jefferson City MO 65101
Phone:573.634-6410
Building Location:
Type of Occupancy:
Type of Construction:
Design Occupant Load:
Related Building Permit:
Description
Sprinkler:
OWNER
CAPITAL OPPORTUNITY FUND L L C
320 NISHODSE BLUFF DR
JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101
Fax:573-634-6562
311 BOLIVAR ST
A-2 (Assembly)
V-0
75 (lower level only)
BP21-0606
Construction of a new 2 story building
and associated site improvements.
NFPA 13
CONTRACTOR
SIGNATURE ITOMES OF JEFFERSON CITY INC.
P.O. BOX 105735
JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65110
Restrictions: This certificate is to allow occupancy and operation of the coffee shop on the lower
level only. The upper level and north parking area shall be limited to construction access only until
brought into conformance with the previously submitted and approved plans. This certificate expires
August 12, 2022.
This is to certify that the premises has been Inspected and are in compliance with the building codes and ordinances of the City
Insofar as can be determined by a visual inspection of the building.
Current Adopted Codes: 2014 National Electrical Code 2015 International Building Code
2015 International Plumbing Code 2015 International Residential Code
2015 International Fire Code 2015 International Existing Building Code
2015 International Mechanical Code 7015 International Fuel Gas Code
2015 International Swimming Pool and spa Code
The City does not make any guarantee or warranty as to the condition of these premises or the quality of workmanship in the
construction or rehabilitation of the premises. Nor does the City assume any liability arising from the inspection and issuance of this
Temporary Certificate of Occupancy.
It Is specifically understood that this Certificate becomes null and void when secured through fraud or when changes In construction,
or use Is made without the approval of the Department of Plann' & Protective services.
Issued by: K Date:
MattWj Kreyling, i t tldiU Official
Coorespondence/Timeline Packet
Page 37
From: Jeff Schaeperkoetter <jwschae@hotmail.com>
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2022 8:10 AM
To: Barron, Eric <EBarron@jeffersoncitymo.gov>
Cc: Sanders, Sonny <SSanders@jeffersoncitymo.gov>; Schofield, Matt<MSchofield@jeffersoncitymo.gov>; Turner, Jason
<JTu rner@ jeffersoncitymo.gov>
Subject: RE: Parking area at rear of new building
Eric: I will be filing the amendment form, hopefully this morning. I do appreciate that you responded last week in a timely
fashion for me to meet the filing deadline.
I still think that this should be considered as a minor change. The use of (b)(2) and (d)(4) as the basis for staff deciding it is
not a minor change is interesting to me. Is this really a relocation orjust a change of orientation? Does any increase in
parking spaces increase the demand for traffic circulation? Taking this through the Planning and Zoning and City Council
process just adds to the time and expense of the project.
Also, my memory may be slipping, but I do not recall that the parking area was any significant part of the City Council
meeting. Staff may have had pre -meeting discussions with council members, but I was not privy to those discussions. I
guess the recording of the meeting would be the available, and it might be good for you to provide me with that.
All that being said, if staff reconsiders and determines that this is a minor change that it can approve administratively, I am
obviously fine with that.
Jeff
Sent from Mail for Windows
From: Barron, Eric
Sent: Friday, July 8, 2022 5:12 PM
To: Jeff Schaeperkoetter
Cc: Sanders, Sonny; Schofield, Matt; Turner, Jason
Subject: RE: Parking area at rear of new building
Hello Jeff,
I'll direct you to the Major PUD Plan Amendment process for this request.
Staff do not believe it falls into a Minor PUD Amendment category for the following reasons:
Section 35-74.C.5.b.(2) regarding minor changes not to relocate parking areas closer than 10 feet to a street right-of-way
line.
Section 35-74.C.5.d.(4) regarding minor changes not being authorized for increased demand for traffic circulation.
Also, the parking area adjacent to the alley was a major item of review, consideration, and presentation to the City
Council. It is staffs view that only a City Council action can amend such an item.
The process would be for an Amendment to the Final PUD Plan.
The process is essentially the same as the initial PUD approval process, and involves public notification (including mailed
letters to neighbors and property sign posting), public hearing before the P&Z Commission, and public hearing before the
City Council.
Application form is available at: https://cros4files.revize.com/ieffersoncitymo/P&Z and BOA postings/app-PUD-
Rev ised % 20J u Iy % 202018. pdf
Applicable attachments would be:
- Written narrative describing the request.
- Site Plan drawing showing the requested change.
- Application fee of $700
- Any other relevant information.
The PUD approval at the City Council had some specific references to the alley. I have attached Ordinance 16083.
Coorespondence/Timeline Packet
Page 38
The Final PUD Plan (approved administratively by staff per Section 35-74.C.4.e) is also attached.
The application deadline for the August meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission is Monday, July 11.
The Filing Deadline Calendar, with meeting schedules for both the P&Z Commission and City Council, is available at:
https://cros4files.revize.com/ieffersoncitVmo/2022%20PZ%20Filins/20Calendar%20Public.pdf
If you have any questions let me know.
Sincerely,
Eric Barron
Planning Manager
City of Jefferson
573-634-6419
From: Jeff Schaeperkoetter <iwschaeC@hotmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 7, 2022 2:36 PM
To: Barron, Eric <EBarron(@ieffersoncitymo.gov>
Cc: Schofield, Matt<MSchofield()ieffersoncitymo.gov>; Turner, Jason <JTurner@ieffersoncitymo.eoy>
Subject: FW: Parking area at rear of new building
Eric: As I indicated to you earlier, I will be filing a request to amend the PUD Plan for the property at 309/311 Bolivar
Street.
I want to make sure that I follow the correct procedure, and am relying on Section 35-74 for that procedure. Please advise
that I am relying on the proper code section for filing the proposed amendment.
I note that that section requires the applicant to provide the Director with an envelope and notice addressed to any
person who testified regarding the project at a prior public meeting. I recall that a neighbor testified at the City Council
meeting, and would request that you provide me with the name and address of all persons who testified at either the
Planning and Zoning Commission or Council meeting. If you would prefer, I can glean that information from the minutes
of the meetings, in which case I would need a copy of them, which can be sent to me electronically.
I will be requesting that the amendment be deemed a minor change, and, of course, am prepared to present the request
to the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council as necessary. I assume that, if the P & Z process is necessitated
by a staff decision that this is not a minor change, there may be a notice requirement, and I would appreciate it if you
would provide me with the notice requirements so I can determine whether the August 4 P & Z meeting is a possibility.
Your earliest possible response is requested as the timing of this is important to us.
Jeff Schaeperkoetter
Capitol Opportunity Fund, L.L.C.
Sent from Mail for Windows
Coorespondence/Timeline Packet
Page 39
On Aug 29, 2022, at 1:34 PM, Barron, Eric <EBarron@jeffersoncitymo.gov> wrote:
Hi Jeff,
I'd probably refer you to the law department on any contract regarding the tower.
The meeting at the City Council on September 6 is just bill introduction. If there are concerns about the language of
the bill there should be ample time to address them prior to public hearing/bill passage on September 19. It would
be a standard bill approving a PUD plan amendment, with the condition that the P&Z Commission placed on it.
Sincerely,
Eric Barron
Planning Manager
City of Jefferson
573-634-6419
From: Jeff Schaeperkoetter <jwschae@hotmail.com>
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2022 1:27 PM
To: Barron, Eric <EBarron@jeffersoncitymo.gov>
Cc: Sanders, Sonny <SSanders@jeffersoncitymo.gov>; Kreyling, Matt <MKreyling@jeffersoncitymo.gov>
Subject: RE: City Council meeting on proposed amendment
Thanks, Eric. I had intended to cc Mr. Sanders and Mr. Kreyling as they were on a previous email. Since the
concerns expressed by staff did not only involve the fire department's issues, I just wanted to inquire so I can be
prepared for the hearing before the City Council.
I have rearranged a flight schedule to come back to Jefferson City early for the Council meeting, and learning the
bill language and recommendation on the Thursday or Friday before the council meeting does not provide much of
an opportunity to prepare for the hearing.
I have asked Kortney to give me a link to the P & Z hearing. To help me prepare further for the City Council hearing,
I would also like a copy of the contract with the tower company so I can see the language guaranteeing them access
to the tower site. I am not sure who would have this, so let me know if I need to contact somebody else.
Jeff
Sent from Mail for Windows
From: Barron, Eric
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2022 8:11 AM
To: Jeff Schaeperkoetter
Cc: Sanders, Sonny; Kreyling, Matt
Subject: RE: City Council meeting on proposed amendment
Hello Jeff,
Coorespondencefrimeline Packet
Page 40
Staff recommendations do not typically change between the P&Z and City Council meetings.
That being said, if you're looking for feedback from the Fire Department on their thoughts, I'd refer you directly to
them.
I noticed that you copied Matt Kreyling (the Building Official) on this email. If you were intending Matt Schofield
(the Fire Chief) you may have tagged the wrong email address.
The City Council packets typically are posted by the Clerk by Thursday/Friday before the Council Meeting. That
posting includes the bill and bill summary with recommendation.
Sincerely,
Eric Barron
Planning Manager
City of Jefferson
573-634-6419
From: Jeff Schaeperkoetter <iwschae@hotmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2022 1:56 PM
To: Barron, Eric <EBarron@ieffersoncitymo.gov>; Kreyling, Matt<MKrevling@ieffersoncitymo.gov>; Sanders, Sonny
<SSanders@ieffersoncitymo.gov>
Subject: City Council meeting on proposed amendment
Gentlemen:
As I prepare for the City Council meeting, I need to inquire as to the position City staff (including the fire
department) will take on the proposed amendment now that P & Z has recommended approval.
Jeff
Sent from Mail for Windows
Coorespondence/Timeline Packet
Page 41
City of Jefferson
Department of Planning & Protective Services
320 E. McCarty St.
Jefferson City, MO 65101
December 27, 2022
Dear Property Owner:
Carrie Tercjin, Mayor
Sonny Sanders, AICP, Director
Phone: 573-634-6410
Fax: 573-634-6457
This letter is to notify you that the Jefferson City Planning and Zoning Commission will meet at 5:15 p.m.
on Thursday, January 12, 2023 in the Council Chambers of the John G. Christy Municipal Building, 320
East McCarty Street to consider the following matters (see map on back):
Case No. P23003 — 309 & 311 Bolivar Street, Amendment to PUD Plan. Request filed by Capital
Opportunity Fund LLC, property owner, to amend the approved PUD Planned Unit Development plan to
change the number and orientation of parking spaces located on the north side of the property adjacent to
West Wall Way. The property is located on the northeast corner of the intersection of West McCarty Street
and Bolivar Street and is described as the northerly part of Inlot No. 424, in the City of Jefferson, Cole
County, Missouri.
As a nearby landowner and/or neighbor, you are being provided notice of this hearing. Unfortunately, we
are unable to record comments received by telephone, however, written comments may be directed to the
Planning and Zoning Commission in one of the following ways:
e-mail: JCPlanning@jeffersoncitymo.gov
fax: Dept. of Planning and Protective Services / Planning Division 573-634-6457
mail: Dept. of Planning and Protective Services / Planning Division
John G. Christy Municipal Building, 320 E. McCarty Street Jefferson City, MO 65101
Written comments received on or before 1:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting will be made a part of the
official record and copied and distributed to Commission members at the meeting. Those unable to provide
written comments in advance are invited to deliver their comments to the Commission Chairman only at the
meeting. Correspondence received after 1:00 p.m. on the day of the meeting will be included in the official
record, but there is no guarantee that copies will be made for distribution to all Commission members.
For your information, this case is tentatively scheduled for a public hearing in front of the City Council on
February 20, 2023. The City Council meets at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the John G. Christy
Municipal Building, 320 East McCarty Street.
Information regarding this case may be viewed on the Planning and Zoning Commission webpage at:
https://www.ieffersoncitymo.gov/government/planning/planning and zoning commission php
Please contact the Planning and Zoning Division via phone at 573.634.6573 with pertinent questions.
Best Regards,
Kortney Bliss
Planner 1
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats
as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request.
Please call (573) 634-6410 with questions regarding agenda items.
Case No. P23003
309 & 311 Bolivar Street
Major PUD Plan Amendment
185 ft. Notification Buffer
N
W + E
S
0 40 80 160 240 320
Feet
Jefferson City Planning and Zoning Commission
Property Owner list
Case No. P23003 309 & 311 Bolivar Street
1914 PROPERTIES L L C
1234 ASHBURY WAY
WARDSVILLE, MO 65101
AMERICAN TOWER CORP SITE #274000
% PROPERTY TAX
PO BOX 723597
ATLANTA, GA 31139-0597
AT&T SERVICES
AT&T SERVICES TOWER PROPERTY TAX TEAM
754 PEACHTREE ST NE 16TH FLOOR
ATLANTA, GA 30308
BRYAN, JOSEPH T
304 BOLIVAR ST
JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101
CAPITAL OPPORTUNITY FUND L L C
320 NISHODSE BLUFF DR
JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101
JEFFERSON CITY DISTRIBUTORS INC
301 CONSTITUTION DR
JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65109
KALUGINA, SVETLANA
306 BOLIVAR ST
JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101
LINCOLN CENTER L L C
1718 HAYSELTON DR
JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65109
MASTROGIANNIS PROPERTIES L L C
117 MONTEREY DR
JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65109
MISSOURI LOCAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES
RETIREMENT SYSTEM (LAGERS)
PO BOX 1665
JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65102
12/28/22
ST LOUIS, MO 63101
MISSOURI STATE OF
PO BOX 809
JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65102
OAKBROOK PROPERTIES L L C
320 NISHODSE BLUFF
JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101
RADEMANN, EDWIN A & JUDY A TRUSTEES
4820 RAINBOW HILLS RD
JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65109
SCHRIMPF, STEVEN
2820 BRUSH CREEK CT
JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65109
SIMS, WILLIAM DOUGLAS TRUSTEE
330 BOLIVAR ST
JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101
WANSING, FRANKLIN G
310 BOLIVAR ST
JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101
MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD
Jefferson Cot}
Planning Zom'ng Commission
January U, 200 -3
Case No. P23004
1000 Block of Marshall Street
Zeal Enterprise, LLC
Final Subdivision Plat
City of Jefferson Planning & Zoning Commission
LOCATION MAP
Case No. P23004
1000 Block of Marshall Street
Final Subdivision Plat
0 45 90 180 Feet N
W r E
S
City of Jefferson Planning and Zoning Corr mr ssion
VICINITY
Case No. P23004 N
1000 Block of Marshall Street 0 85 170 340 Feet
Final Subdivision Plat w + E
s
PLANNING STAFF REPORT
JEFFERSON CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
January 12, 2023
Case No. P23004 —1000 Block of Marshall St., Final Subdivision Plat of TC3C Subdivision. Request
filed by Zeal Enterprise, LLC, property owner, for a Final Subdivision Plat for 1.88 acres proposing creation
of 10 lots. The property is zoned RS-4 Medium Density Residential and is located on the Marshall Street
cul-de-sac 250 feet north of East Franklin Street and with frontage also on Roland Street and is described
as Part of the Northeast Quarter Section 18, Township 45 North, Range 11 West, in the City of Jefferson,
Cole County, Missouri. (Central Missouri Professional Services, Consultant).
Description of Proposal
A request was filed for a final subdivision plat. Given the name TC3C Subdivision, this final subdivision
plat would consist of 1.88 acres currently zoned RS-4 Medium Density Residential. The final subdivision
plat would replat 6 existing lots into 10 new lots to be used for single family residential units.
Review and Approval Process
Final subdivision plats are reviewed in accordance with Chapter 33 The Subdivision Code and Chapter 35
Zoning Code with recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission and final decision by the
City Council.
Staff Analysis
Current zoning designation of RS-4 requires the subdivision to comply with density and dimensional
standards of that particular district. This includes lot size and width specifications. The RS-4 district requires
a minimum net lot area 6,000 square feet and minimum lot width of 50 feet.
Final Subdivision Plat request - information for consideration:
Proposed Subdivision Name: TC3C Subdivision
Total Acreage: 1.88 acres.
Number of Lots: 10 proposed lots
Lot Sizes: Lot 7 is proposed to be the largest at approximately 11,571 square feet and Lot 10 is proposed
to be the smallest at approximately 6,458 square feet.
Sidewalks: Existing sidewalk is located along Roland Street and the northern side of Marshall Street,
ending at the cul-de-sac.
Streets: No new streets are proposed.
Utilities: Utilities exist in the vicinity.
Fire Hydrant: Fire hydrants exist on Roland Street with proper spacing. A fire hydrant will likely need
to be installed on Marshall Street to serve the proposed lots.
Staff Recommendation
The proposed final subdivision plat has been reviewed with respect to applicable City Code requirements
such as those laid out in Chapter 33 The Subdivision Code and Chapter 35 Zoning Code. Technical
comments from staff will need to be addressed. Staff recommended approval of the final plat of TOC
Subdivision with the condition that technical comments by city staff be resolved.
Form of Motion
1. Motion to recommend approval to the City Council of the requested final Subdivision plat of
TOC Subdivision with the following conditions:
a. Address technical comments from city staff.
b. Submittal of finalized and signed plat prior to introduction to City Council.
Jefferson City Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting
Engineering Division Staff Report
Thursday, January 12, 2023, 5:15pm
Item 6. — New Business/ Public Hearings
Case No. P23004 — Re -Plat/ Final Plat of TC3C Subdivision, 1000 block of Marshall Street (RS-4)
ENGINEERING STAFF RECOMMENDATION -
Recommend approval.
Existinjj Infrastructure Summary
• Public infrastructure exists in the vicinity.
• Storm water facilities exist in the vicinity.
• Sanitary sewer facilities exist in the vicinity.
• Streets are existing in the vicinity.
• Sidewalk exists for this subdivision.
• A street light exists for this subdivision.
• Utilities will need to be checked, to see if adequate facilities are in place to serve these proposed
lots. It does not appear that any fire hydrants are present in the vicinity of the cul-de-sac.
Technical Review of the Plat
• A few very minor technical review comments for the plat have been sent back to the consultant for
consideration. These comments will need to be addressed prior to consideration of the plat by the
City Council. The plat as presented is in good order.
City of Jefferson
Department of Planning & Protective Services
320 E. McCarty Street
Jefferson City, MO 65101
Phone: 573-634-6410
icpla nnin q0ieffcitym o. orq
www.jeffersoncitymo.gov
APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION PLAT
The undersigned hereby petitions the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council of the City of Jefferson,
Missouri for the following type of subdivision: Preliminary Plat X Final Plat
1. Name of Subdivision: TC3C SUBDIVISION
2. General location: 1000 BLOCK OF MARSHALL
3. Existing/Proposed zoning: RS-4
4. Existing/Proposed use of the property: Single Family Residential
5. Size of the property in acres: 1.88 Acres
6. Total number of lots proposed: 10
7. Description of any variances to the Subdivision Regulations being requested (please note section number
of the regulation below and attach a letter stating justification for the variance(s):
None
8. Application filing fee: $ 400.00 Preliminary Plat = $500 + $5 p-er_lot__Minor Revision = $250 + $5 per lot
Final Plat = $350 + $5 per -lot —to Preliminary Plat
(Revised July 1, 2018)"
9. Signatures:
Zeal Enterprise, LLC - Tim Joseph
Property Owner Name (type or print)
Paul Samson, PE
Engineer Name (type or print)
Date
J. Brian Rockwell
Surveyor Name (type or print)
Contact person for this application:
Name: Paul Samson - CMPS
Phone Number: 573-634-3455
For Staff Use Only:
Signa ure
Engineer Signature
urveyor
z/z /z
Date
l2/;;I/z
Date
Address: 2500 E. McCarty St. Jefferson City, MO 65101
Email: psamson@cmps-inc.com
Attachments: _ Variance request letter —Additional documentation
Notes:
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans
with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request.
Page 1 of 5
z�
Oti
a
2
LL O a
Z On
~ "
Qw0
v m
Sz
dozQy—
ita
Vi W�O
=y "
"—
Fz7vz
g
Q a
0:od�a
OzU
z ^
Vy
M
coVIZ=
O
W-a�
Oz
ego
d-0
xa
a{G{G Etiy
V)
L
y2� �d
WWWWW �t
'
U °o�
g�LL
z3� a
adz
4
WN 3
UaQ0
w.
m 0
aad-
0'
�
~ aog
zzuw".
s
5a
mC
o�Es ��
wQ
C
w
"
I
I
I
i
I
�a
I
�
z
z
�.
A
I
I
I
I
I
I
'i: z�
.bv
EY 5Fr
�a53S
X
S
535�5 23
�
Ey'fa
9
�;eQE n 3:
2
Eaa
all<
�
H, al
E s d
FMlll E f5
I
wI vl
32e
!Z a
E
I �
I
3 ..
cn
d ' y
o !
2n4
IT
It
i I umss rax.nuavn
----
�
! I L
v�
lzra4 TMSHM n B
I uuv�vxoiro \ A SS
!\)J1x1'ftMNfriWYLVN�
t 4 �'!C S
MA§ gM r
� a 4
oY� � �36�Sad � a
Rapt Se�9 �
3
$ e
BRIM