HomeMy Public PortalAbout2014.08.27 Special MinutesMINUTES
McCall City Council
Special Joint Meeting with the
Payette Lakes Recreational, Water and Sewer District
McCall -Donnelly High School Annex
401 Mission Street
August 27, 2014
Agenda
Call to Order and Roll Call
Work Session
Adjournment
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL
Mayor Aymon called the regular meeting of the McCall City Council to order at 6:30 p.m.
Mayor Aymon, Councilor Giles, Councilor Scott, Councilor Swanson, and Councilor Witte
all answered roll call.
City staff members present were Gene Drabinski, City Manager; Bill Nichols, City Attorney;
Peter Borner, Public Works Director; Nathan Coyle, Airport Manager; Linda Stokes, City
Treasurer; Matthew Dellwo, Waste Water; Stacey Lafay, Waste Water; and BessieJo Wagner,
City Clerk.
Engineering staff members supporting the City of McCall were Brian Foote, Horrocks
Engineers; and Cathy Cooper, SPF Water Engineering.
Payette Lakes Water and Sewer District Board members present were Jerry Vevig, Chairman of
the Board; John Battles; Ellen Holm; Dale Caza, Operations Manager; Jamie Melbo, District
Administrator; John Hucks, Legal Counsel.
J-U-B Engineers staff members present were Brett Converse, John Garlitz, and David Watkins.
Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) staff members present were Todd Crutcher,
Engineering Manager, and Gary Carroll.
WORK SESSION
Introductions
Dale Caza, Operations Manager, Payette Lakes Recreational Water & Sewer District, presented
opening comments and introduced Brett Converse, J-U-B Engineers.
McCall City Council Special Meeting
August 27, 2014
Page 1 of 8
Presentation of Draft Reuse Permit — J-U-B Engineers
Brett Converse provided a background summary related to the wastewater land application
permit. He stated that today the existing system for wastewater disposal was authorized under a
land application consent order that was issued several years ago and that the permit will expire in
a couple of years. One of the conditions under which the District operates is that once the
wastewater is treated and disinfected it can be land -applied at a 3:1 dilution with the irrigation
water from Lake Irrigation District. Mr. Converse stated that there are sampling requirements at
the Point of Compliance, which is the point where the wastewater flows out of the chlorine
contact tank into the land application storage lagoon. He explained that there were not a lot of
monetary requirements or things that the District was required to do out in the fields for the
effluent being disposed of However, he stated that there was the requirement to maintain a
mixing station where the effluent and the reuse water are mixed together. Mr. Converse
presented a map that demonstrated the layout of what was being proposed as far as where the
individual systems are and the center pivots, pipelines, and mixing station, providing a scale of
how far away things are.
Mr. Converse continued stating that the existing wastewater disposal system was fairly simple.
He explained that the land is owned by the farmers and the center pivot irrigation systems are
also owned by the farmers. He also explained that portions of the effluent distribution system,
the course mains, are owned by Lake Irrigation Districtand that the mixing station is owned by
the City, which is on Simplot's property through a temporary easement that goes away in 2017.
He stated that the consent order ends in 2017 as well as the easement that Simplot has granted on
the mixing station, which is on Simplot's 500 acres. The permit is an attempt to address what
happens after 2017. Mr. Converse stated that the District is planning to change the authorization
to land -apply by consent order to a more typical land application by the DEQ reuse permit. The
reuse permit simply gives the wastewater treatment generator permission to land -apply the
wastewater at a slow agronomic rate for hydraulic uptake and nutrients of concern such as
phosphorus and nitrogen. He further explained that another thing that would change is that 100%
recycled water would be applied instead of a 3:1 dilution, so there would be no requirement for
diluting the effluent before land -applying. He stated that J-U-B's discussion with the farmers
suggested the farmers would like to continue blending. Mr. Converse explained that the blending
stretches out their water, nitrogen, and the nutrients; however, there are times when Lake
Irrigation District water is not available for the blending. He explained that when that happens,
the effluent can no longer be land -applied. This will extend the farmers' irrigation system a few
weeks into the fall when Lake Irrigation District water is shut off and they can still receive
effluent. Mr. Converse stated that this slow -rate land application permit will be written around
Class C Reuse. He stated that the draft permit came back in class C+ reuse. He stated that right
now the draft permit has been issued, is in draft form, and is out for permitting review that is
being undertaken and it will soon go out for DEQ to receive comments.
Mr. Converse continued stating that the permit was written so that the District is responsible for
compliance, monitoring, testing, and reporting as it relates to the effluent. He explained that
because the District is operating now under a slow -rate land application permit up to 100%
recycled water; the fields will undergo a little more scrutiny. He stated that there is going to be
sample testing required on the fields and water monitoring. He stated that the District will have
to take more responsibility on the functionality of the overall system, collect the samples, get
McCall City Council Special Meeting Page 2 of 8
August 27, 2014
them analyzed, and do an annual report that documents where the water was sent, how it was
irrigated, the crops that came off, and essentially perform checks and balances on the nutrients
and the water that were applied at agronomic rates.
Mr. Converse continued stating that in the existing system the water from the City's and the
District's sewers comes together and is jointly treated at the wastewater treatment plant with the
Point of Compliance at the end of the lagoons, then goes into the storage lagoon, and then sent
several thousand feet south to a mixing station at the appropriate time of year. He stated that the
wastewater is put into Lake Irrigation District's distribution lines and then fed to the fields of the
farmers. Mr. Converse pointed out that there are a lot of fields that the farmers irrigate, and these
are just the ones that need permitting, and there are many more out there currently that are not
permitted. He explained that the permit only represents two landowners that the District currently
has agreements with and a third landowner who has expressed interest as well. He explained that
the farmers have freedom to grow almost anything they want currently, but the next step is going
to require some amount of control over what they do; however, the farmers will still have
operational control over the effluent distribution and what crops they grow. There is enough land
that they can choose to grow almost any crop, as long as they provide the crops that are
necessary to get rid of all the effluent that is generated throughout the year. He stated that at this
point those arrangements are tentatively in order.
Mr. Converse stated that the proposed system would be the City and the District maintaining
their own sewer systems, with the City treating the wastewater, but at the Point of Compliance
the District would be responsible for all the nuances associated with effluent and disposal. He
stated that the District would be taking over the obligations of the storage lagoon and the mixing
station and the Lake Irrigation District would still own and have some control over the course
mains and distribute the lines, but the District will have some control over the fields as far as the
sampling and the groundwater monitoring, the crop management, and the annual permit.
Mr. Converse explained that the permit is in draft form, pending all of the agreements that have
to be put in place to move it on to the next step. The contracts will have to be submitted to DEQ.
He stated that right now the District is working under letters of intent with the farmers, which
was a big step for the District, but the contracts are not yet in place with the farmers that would
satisfy DEQ requirements for contractual obligations to receive the effluent. He continued stating
that the contract would be a 30-year agreement with a renewal in 20, which works out well
because planning is done in 20-year increments. He stated that the farmers have agreed to grant
the District 30 years, and that will give the District 20 years to see how the system works, and
then at the end of the 20 years if all parties are happy with the arrangement another 30-year
contract can be pursued with renewal after 20 years. He continued stating that once those
contracts are in place the DEQ would update the permit, issue the public draft, go through the
public comment period with the appropriate meetings, and then DEQ would incorporate the
comments that they choose and then issue the final permit. He stated that once that final permit is
in place irrigating and management of wastewater can take place under the typical DEQ-
approved procedure.
It was clarified that prior to implementation, the District would need to discuss some of the
contracts, finalize the Memorandum of Understanding with the City, and sign contracts. The four
McCall City Council Special Meeting Page 3 of 8
August 27, 2014
entities, including the District, the farmers, the City, and the [LIDL] need to have contracts in
place to make sure the water flows where it needs to go and is disposed of in an approved
manner by DEQ.
Mr. Converse suggested that it would be good at this point for the City and the District to come
together and determine how this plan that will be implemented aligns with the 20-year facilities
master plan. He stated that the facilities master plan should be reexamined to see how valid it is
now with the current plan of slow -rate land application over the next 20 years. He stated that the
District would then generate its master planning documents that would reflect the current system.
The master plan documents typically identify improvements that are needed, critical facilities
and infrastructure that may or may not exist today that are required to continue to provide
reliable service for the next 20 years. He explained that the DEQ wants this to be operational by
the end of the growing season in 2016 because the permit expires in 2017 before the growing
season. When the consent order expires, the existing system needs to be running exactly the way
it is but will be operating under the permit.
Mr. Converse continued that the City and the District need to look at joint master planning
activities on things that are shared such as the storage pond, the disposal facility, reservoirs, lift
stations, all parts of the effluent disposal systems, and upgrades to facilities that are needed to
provide reliable service. He stated that some of these have been identified, and some, of course,
have been in use but have not been identified and a comparative analysis done to see what is the
best way to move ahead. He stated that if operations continue the way they are and the permit is
renegotiated with the farmers, there is a danger that the farmers would become subject to third -
party lawsuits, therefore this should be permitted so it meets the current reuse rules that are out
there today.
Mr. Converse stated that there are additional things that most likely are in the City's court as far
as master planning of the actual treatment facility. The main point is that if there are capacity
elements or to meet the requirements of the permit, those also would have to be operational by
the time the permit is issued. He stated that the permit will require adequate water treatment of
the wastewater before it goes on to the land application site.
Mr. Converse concluded stating that when looking at the land application site, right now the
farmers are irrigating a couple of sites that are within the permitted allowable setbacks, so a few
changes have to be made to bring the sites under the new rules. He stated that improvements to
the sites may include some piping, vegetative buffers, and just little things to bring all of the sites
that will be used into exact compliance with the reuse rules. He stated that the mixing station is
on Simplot's property, and if they should decide to start charging the District for having it on the
property it would probably have to be moved. Fortunately, the District owns 120 acres across the
fence from Simplot, so land would not have to be purchased, but a critical infrastructure
improvement might be moving this mixing station or the pipelines to the farmers.
Questions and Continued Discussion Among City Council and District Board Members
It was clarified that in master planning, every facility should have a good master plan to outline a
pathway over the next 20 years such as treatment plant capacity and things that can be upgraded.
When determining what pipe is to be put in the ground, having a master plan forces the District
McCall City Council Special Meeting Page 4 of 8
August 27, 2014
to look out a little bit farther than that to make sure there is good value for the infrastructure that
is put in the ground and it is going to last a long time. Part of identifying and ensuring that the
District has adequate capacity to serve through the end of the planning period is the master plan
that the District looks at. The District looks at growth, analyzes the wastewater treatment plant,
looks at how much capacity it has, how much needed is at the end of the planning period, and if
there is a gap there then at some point in time a capital improvement project is planned to expand
the capacity. Sand filters might be a good example to talk about. Sand filters today have a
reliable capacity to serve until 2018 or 2020. By recognizing the time frame after that the sand
filters do not have a reliable capacity, sometime between 2018 and 2020 a sand filter will need to
be built so it will be online by 2020. By knowing that sand filters will need to be replaced, the
District can think about how to finance the project through bonds, raising rates, etc.
It was recognized that some of these items were discussed at the last joint meeting held a few
years ago in terms of the actual capacity versus growth from a 20-year perspective. There was
enough capacity there, but there were some components that might need some upgrades or some
refinements or maintenance.
Councilor Witte asked if there were any profound differences in requirements for the wastewater
coming out of the City's treatment plant. For example, the City does not operate the sand filters
all 12 months of the year. Wi11 any changes be necessary? Can the City still produce the same
quality of effluent that is produced during the various seasons? It was explained that there is no
difference. Currently Class C+ effluent is produced in the same timeframe that is currently
produced today. The filtration is the one thing that is different than the existing consent order.
Under the permit, the filters would have to be run three weeks prior to the start of the growing
season, through the growing season, and then be shut off at the end of the growing season.
Currently that is not a requirement under the consent order. It was stated that sand filters are a
very important part of the draft reuse permit. The permit assumes that sand filters are going to be
in place. So, by the 2017 deadline the City would have to have sand filters up to speed and
running It was clarified that currently sand filters are not used at all. The issue is that in April
the volume of water can not be processed through the sand filter. It was suggested that there are
probably engineering solutions out there that could be fairly expensive. The City Council would
certainly like to understand what those might be before signing the contract in February, so these
details do need to be worked out. There are some assumptions that the sand filter issue will be
easy to fix or it will happen, and that is being determined right now.
Mayor Aymon asked if DEQ has any wiggle room on the sand filter issue. The purpose behind
the sand filter requirement was explained. It has to do with basically pathogen removal and the
particular methods of irrigation that would align with the farmers. There are agreements that
have been worked out with the Department of Agriculture that have said that certain types of
treatment methods will be employed in order to do certain types of things, and one of those is
filtration. In order to make it work, filtration needs to be demonstrated. In reality, it needs to be
shown that the amount of time that water sits in the storage lagoon would provide the same
equivalent of settling for the same removal of pathogens that are not necessarily destroyed by
chlorine, and the other part is filtration. If it can be shown that filtration and pathogen removal
can be done without sand filters, then that is fine. This is just the simplest path forward without
having to do a lot of additional work or research or study or bringing in another state agency that
McCall City Council Special Meeting Page 5 of 8
August 27, 2014
could possibly disagree. It was clarified that there is wiggle room on the sand filters if other
things can be shown and move forward. It was noted to keep in mind this is a "pre -draft," not a
draft of the reuse permit. The District needed to be able to show the farmers an example of what
is likely to be in a permit and what it is going to contain, but the permit is not in a full draft state
yet. There are still negotiations to be had and things can be changed. It is not considered a draft
permit until it is ready to go out for public comment.
Mayor Aymon asked why the permit shows "Permit expiration 10 years from date of issuance."
It was explained that the DEQ's rules allow reuse permits to have cycle times up to 10 years.
After whatever is set (could be five years, could be 10 years), then the permit has to be renewed.
The committee has to reapply for a continuation of the permit. After operation under the permit
for 10 years there may have been some problems discovered and adjustments may be necessary.
A question was asked of the District on the mixing plan and the current 3:1 dilution. It was
explained that in talking to some of the farmers, the 3:1 dilution still has some minor issues with
maintenance of the pivots such as corrosion and chemical reactions, so now 100% dilution is
being discussed. It was asked if 100% dilution had been discussed with the farmers and were
they on board with that. It was explained that both farmers have said they are willing to apply
100% effluent, especially when the Lake Irrigation District water is not available and the farmers
want the extra nutrients in a 100% dilution going on their property leading into the fall and early
spring, and they are on board with that.
Mr. Converse expressed his appreciation for the DEQ and the work they have done with the
District to get where they are today. They have gone through this effort to write this pre -draft
report. He explained that the District's next step is to go out and work with the farmers. The
District needs the contract in place before receiving the permit and go to the next level. So the
DEQ has done a great job for the District.
Councilor Witte asked if the reuse permit still allows for emergency discharge in the river. It was
explained that the reuse permit has no effect on that. That is a completely different permitting
process.
Mayor Aymon asked if the NPSB is an annual permit. It was explained that it is a five-year
permitting cycle. That permit is supposed to be renewed every five years. The EPA has a large
backlog of permits, and they are working on permits that have been expired for five years, so as
long as a renewal is submitted prior to expiration and an acknowledgement is received from
EPA, the administrator would continue until a new permit is written, however long that may
take.
Councilor Witte questioned the capacity of the land because the permit is for less land than
currently planned. She asked if there is there enough land to handle current flow, and if it
requires 100% application will it be accepted at the same time? It was explained that the joint
flows were examined, and at 100% reuse there is more than enough land at the end of the
planning period and if at the end of the planning period the flows increase more than projected,
the farmers will have to take more effluent. With the current pastures there is enough capacity
for the next few years. It may be within the planning period, but there are other permit holders
McCall City Council Special Meeting Page 6 of 8
August 27, 2014
who want in. Right now the District cannot take on any new land because first the permit needs
to become operational, but there will be demand in the future. It was explained that there is a
third letter of intent for an additional 600 acres; it was not clear exactly how many acres the
Simplot Company may want to bring in and the Fairbrother property also has a couple hundred
more acres and wants to come in. The District has kept the list simple because the District did
not know what the permit was going to require. Someone clarified that adding additional
irrigators later would not be a big deal. A permit modification can be applied for at any time if a
new user comes online.
There are two types of modifications for reuse permits that are allowed, minor and major. A
major modification would require a permit to have to go back out for public comment. If acreage
is added for more land application that would be considered a major modification, so it would
have to go out for 30-day public comment period.
It was noted that the storage pond fills roughly 70% on average over the spring. The question
was raised as to how long it would take for the land owners, even at the dilution ratio, to drain
the pond. The following explanation was given: Right now, as it sits, 219,000,000 gallons of
water goes into the storage lagoon in a year. Of the sites that were requested to be permitted, the
irrigation water requirement for those would be 500,000,000 gallons a year, so those sites are
going to need 200,000,000 gallons of clean water just to grow the crop. The recycled water is
only 3/5 of the water that is needed to grow the crops. So a lot of crops would have to be grown
to be at a point where they would need 100% effluent year-round, and then with the additional
landowners that want to come in, that number goes up. The October 12 version of the reuse
permit has the growing season going until the end of September, so that would have to be
changed if application were to take place in October. The DEQ generally requires permit holders
to request allowance to do early spring or late fall applications as fertilizer applications. It has to
be documented and recorded and show the nutrient loading. Some permits are also year-round
permits. The current draft permit reads no application after September 30, so that may need to be
changed. This is something that would be fixed prior to going out for public comment.
Discussion was turned to I&I (infiltration and overflow) and how reducing I&I would
substantially reduce the amount of water available to distribute. The farmers are willing to take
I&I too, but at some point that will be reduced or could go away.
A question was asked on how the City could help with the reuse permit. A good first step is the
cooperation between the City and the District and all parties in attendance at the meeting. The
next step is to get contracts under way. Contracts in place with all three entities are necessary to
get the actual draft permit out for public comment.
Closing Comments — Peter Borner
Peter Borner, Public Works Director, stated that the City and the District are at a critical
juncture, at a point in time where the collaborative measures between both organizations are
absolutely imperative. There is a lot of work to be done in a short period of time. A lot of detail
has to be hammered out within the next two years. The end result will be a system that will run
better with a bigger, better capacity for use. The permit cannot be issued until those details are
worked out. The biggest, most critical detail is the contracts. DEQ would like to see most of the
McCall City Council Special Meeting Page 7 of 8
August 27, 2014
details worked out before issuing the draft permit for public comment. The timeframe calls for
contracts to be completed by mid February 2015. This should be able to be completed in time.
Mr. Borner reiterated the need for cooperation between the District and the City. When working
with the respective City Council, the District, and the engineering groups, planning should be
collaborated between these groups. The way the system is outlined right now, the City shares the
entire major infrastructure with the exception of the lift stations and the pipes, and now some
management of it is changing a little bit. Because it is the most cost effective option, planning
needs to take place collaboratively for the foreseeable future so the City and the District are not
building two new storage ponds at the same time when only one is needed. In terms of long term
forecasting, capital planning should be done collaboratively, after all the immediate work is
done. Sitting down together also reduces or eliminates any misunderstanding or suspicion.
ADJOURNMENT
Without further business, the Mayor adjourned the meeting at 7:35 p.m.
McCall City Council Special Meeting Page 8 of 8
August 27, 2014