Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout09/22/19810 PLANNING BOARD C)'q- :ZTTSE MEETING SEPTEMBER 2, 198' PRESENT: ROBERT J. DIXSON, 6 ILLIAM MAYER, BRiA�i PHEIFLER, BARBARA CWYNN, TOWN CLERK The meeting was started by Mr. Dixson at 9:C) '.P,. T" L purpose of the meeting was to discuss amendments to th. :.aing Ordinances. Tnose sections of Appendix A of the Zoning Ordinance, which 'qave been amended and w_itten in their entirety as a�;eed upon by the Commits,:,; re as follows: Section III. (C) Minimum size of building required. (1) No main residence building shall be constructed or allowed witu less tiaa 3,000 square feet aggrr..;ate floor area. The n +nimum aggxagate floor area is the total floor area of a building, exclusi•;e of terrace and .nr.)ofed areas, including 25 percent of attacheci garages arad screened porches. Screen top patios dre considered unroofed areas. (Swimming pools will be permitted subject to setback requirements). Jection III. (E) Front yard required. (1) There shall be a front yard not- less'than forty feet (40 ft.) in depth and with a width of not less than one hundred feet (100 ft.) frcnt.ng on a street, road, avenue, or the Atlantic Ocean. Tract, of land Fronting on the Ocean Boulevard and extending eastward to the Atlantic Ocean need only front one hundred feet (100 ft.'J on the Atlantic Ocean, or one hundred feet (100 ft.) on the Ocean Boulevard. * Section III. iF) Side yard required. (1) There shall be side yards of not less than twenty feet (20 ft.) on each sica of building, including porches, projections, :ornices and eaves, and no building shall be nearer than forty feet (A0 ft.) from any other building, including porches, ,,rejections. cornices and eaves, on the adjoining lot. t Tracts of land f onting either on Ocean Boulevard or the Atlantic Ocean shall he required to have a landward twenty - five foot (25 ft.) setback from the construction setback line established by the Department of Natural Resource;, ;fate of Florida. Page Two Planning Boar September 22, Section III. (1) Section III. (1) d Committee Meeting 1981 (G) Rear yard required. There shall be a rear yard having a depth of not less than twenty feet (20 ft.). (H) Walls and fences. This section is acceptable, with the stipulation that a permit is needed to put up a fence. Section IV. (C) Front yard required. (1) There shall be a front yard not less than fifty feet (50 ft.) in depth. On corner lots both sides of the lots facing the street shall be deemed front yards. Section IV. (D) Side yard required. (1) There shall be side yards not less than twenty -five feet (25 ft.). Section IV. (E) Rear yard required. (1) There shall be a rear yard of at least twenty -five feet (25 ft.). Section IV. (F) Building site area. (1) The minimum building site area shall be one lot or parcel of land 20,000 square feet in area for one dwelling unit and for each one - family (single) dwelling. For each additional unit in an apartment building with more than two units, 5,000 square feet shall be added to the minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet. Section IV. (F) Building site area. (2) The minimum lot dimensions comprising the building site area shall be as follows: (a) Front, 100 feet (b) Width, 60 feet (c) Depth, 100 feet (d) Area (square feet) 20,000 square feet Page Three Planning Board Committee Meeting September 22, 1981 1 All present were satisfied with the changes and additions made to the Zoning Ordinances. The amended Zoning Ordinances would be given to Gene Caputo, then brought back before the Commission. There being no further comments or suggestions, the meeting was adjourned, 10:15 A.M. Barbara Gwynn,-To Clerk ?k �1 HARRY A. JOHNSTON 11 DONALD J. SASSER JOHN C. RANDOLPH H.ADAMS WEAVER Town of Gulf 246 Sea Road Gulf Stream, Attention: JOHNSTON, SASSER, RANDOLPH & WEAVER ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW 310 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 Y. O. RO8 M OF COUNSEL HARRY ALLISON JOHNSTON September 9, 1981 HENRY F. LILIENTHAL 130SI 655 - 010 8 Stream FL 33444 Mr. Dixon Re: Town of Gulf Stream - Zoning Ordinance Dear Mr. Dixon: I am writing this letter in response to your request for my suggestions and advice in regard to the sufficiency of the present Zoning Ordinance of the Town of Gulf Stream. j' As I have advised you, it is strictly a policy decision as to whether or not the Commission wishes to make extensive changes in the Zoning Ordinance. The Ordinance has served the Town well over the past several years. As to how long the Ordinance , will continue to sufficiently protect the interests of the Town, no one can predict. Looking at the Ordinance, however, strictly from a legal standpoint and based upon my familiarity with zoning ordinances of other local municipalities, I am compelled to advise that the Ordinance is antiquated and in need of much revision. I have prepared, in draft form, some temporary amendments as recommended by Mr. Caputo and the Zoning Ordinance Revision Committee. If the Town Commission feels that these minimal amendments are necessary as a temporary measure, I would recommend they be adopted. If, however, it is the decision of the Commission to modify the Ordinance in its entirety and that temporary amendments are not necessary, I would recommend that the Ordinance be redrafted in its entirety. I am not completely satisfied with attempts to amend the Ordi- nance on a piecemeal basis. ��) Mr. Dixon Page Two September 9, 1981 Some of the general areas which are in need of revision, in the event the Town Commission is of a mind to consider exten- sive amendments to the Zoning Ordinance are as follows: 1. Incorporate much of the language set forth in Chapter 9 of the Code of Ordinances of the Town relating to planning and plats and the Town Planning Board into the Zoning Ordinance. 2. Revise in its entirety Section 9 of the Zoning Ordinance relating to Special Excep- tions. The language set forth therein seems to confuse special exceptions with variances. 3. Section 14 relating to Town Planning Board should be revised and combined with the language at Page 926 of the Code. O 4. The definitions could stand a complete revision. 5. Incorporate the recreational vehicle ordinance into the zoning ordinance. 6. Incorporate the flood control ordinance into the zoning ordinance. 7. Establish more specific and concise lan- guage relating to changes and amendments to the zoning ordinance and also as to variances. Q, These are just some of the areas which are in need of revision in the event the Commission wishes to bring its Zoning Ordinance up- to -date. Such revisions would take a good deal of time and analysis, both from a legal standpoint and a land planning stand- point. I cannot accurately predict what the cost of such revi- sions would be. The appropriate method would be for the Commis- sion to make a determination as to whether or not they want this work done, to outline what they wish to be done and to present it to a consultant for purposes of giving the Commission an estimated cost. JOHNSTON. SASSER, RANDOLPH & WEAVER sr,_a Mr. Dixon Page Three September 9, 1981 I hope that this letter is responsive to your request. JCR /Smo Very truly yours, JOHNSTON, SASSER, C. Randolph JOHNSTON. SASSER, RANDOLPH & WEAVER & WEAVER