The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My Public Portal About20190722plCC 701-32 DOCUMENTS IN THIS PACKET INCLUDE: LETTERS FROM CITIZENS TO THE MAYOR OR CITY COUNCIL RESPONSES FROM STAFF TO LETTERS FROM CITIZENS ITEMS FROM MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS ITEMS FROM OTHER COMMITTEES AND AGENCIES ITEMS FROM CITY, COUNTY, STATE, AND REGIONAL AGENCIES Prepared for: 7/22/2019 Document dates: 07/03/2019 – 07/10/2019 Set 1 Note: Documents for every category may not have been received for packet reproduction in a given week. 1 Brettle, Jessica From:aram james <abjpd1@icloud.com> Sent:Thursday, July 4, 2019 3:34 PM To:Council, City; council@redwoodcity.org; cindy.chavez@bos.sccgov.org; city.council@menlopark.org; paloaltofreepress@gmail.com; Perron, Zachary; CTTaylor@menlopark.org; cmrstaylor@gmail.com; pushpinder.lubana@gmail.com; jrosen@da.sccgov.org Subject:wbur.org: As A Black American, I Don't Celebrate The Fourth Of July...... by Arielle Gray CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. ________________________________ As A Black American, I Don't Celebrate The Fourth Of July https://www.wbur.org/artery/2019/07/03/black‐american‐ fourth‐of‐july 1 Brettle, Jessica From:Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org> Sent:Monday, July 8, 2019 1:04 AM To:Loran Harding; dennisbalakian; David Balakian; Dan Richard; Daniel Zack; kfsndesk; newsdesk; kwalsh@kmaxtv.com; Joel Stiner; info@superide1.com; midge@thebarretts.com; terry; Cathy Lewis; margaret-sasaki@live.com; Mark Kreutzer; Mark Standriff; Mayor; Council, City; huidentalsanmateo; Doug Vagim; Steve Wayte Subject:Fwd: CBS News: fake news re Calif. quakes- Calif. devastated!!!!!!!! Lying bastards CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Forwarded message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ From: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org> Date: Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 12:34 AM Subject: Fwd: CBS News: fake news re Calif. quakes‐ Calif. devastated!!!!!!!! Lying bastards To: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Forwarded message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ From: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org> Date: Sun, Jul 7, 2019 at 7:35 PM Subject: Fwd: CBS News: fake news re Calif. quakes‐ Calif. devastated!!!!!!!! Lying bastards To: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Forwarded message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ From: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org> Date: Sun, Jul 7, 2019 at 5:30 PM Subject: Fwd: CBS News: fake news re Calif. quakes‐ Calif. devastated!!!!!!!! Lying bastards To: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Forwarded message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ From: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org> Date: Sun, Jul 7, 2019 at 4:56 PM Subject: Fwd: CBS News: fake news re Calif. quakes‐ Calif. devastated!!!!!!!! Lying bastards To: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org> 2 ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Forwarded message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ From: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org> Date: Sun, Jul 7, 2019 at 4:41 PM Subject: Fwd: CBS News: fake news re Calif. quakes‐ Calif. devastated!!!!!!!! Lying bastards To: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Forwarded message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ From: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org> Date: Sun, Jul 7, 2019 at 4:16 PM Subject: Fwd: CBS News: fake news re Calif. quakes‐ Calif. devastated!!!!!!!! Lying bastards To: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Forwarded message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ From: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org> Date: Sun, Jul 7, 2019 at 4:06 AM Subject: Fwd: CBS News: fake news re Calif. quakes‐ Calif. devastated!!!!!!!! Lying bastards To: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Forwarded message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ From: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org> Date: Sun, Jul 7, 2019 at 3:36 AM Subject: CBS News: fake news re Calif. quakes‐ Calif. devastated!!!!!!!! Lying bastards To: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org> Sunday, July 7, 2019 To all‐ In this report from CBS Evening News on Saturday, July 6, 2019, they leave the impression that the 7.1 magnitude quake near Ridgecrest, Calif, at 8:19 PM on Friday evening, July 5, 2019 in the far northern Mojave Desert, and 150 miles north of Los Angeles, caused massive damage in Los Angeles. If it had done, that would be big news. They show a man speaking, telling how scared he was during the quake. BUT he was in Ridgecrest, not Los Angeles. But somehow CBS News neglected to make that clear. Thousands of homes and businesses flattened from Malibu to San Diego, right? No, not right CBS News. https://www.cbs.com/shows/cbs_evening_news/video/ And here, at about 2:30, i.e., at two minutes, 30 seconds, you hear a USGS scientist, in a news conference at Cal Tech, say "there is very little damage in the Los Angeles area", 150 miles south of the 7.1 earthquake near the town of Ridgecrest which occurred on Friday evening around 8:19 PM on July 5, 2019. So who is lying? CBS News or the expert from the USGS, and the lady seismologist from Cal Tech, both speaking at Cal Tech? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mF1e5oKZSMM Trump complains about fake news. Here you see a good example of it. 3 CBS News says what they think their viewers want to hear, and most viewers in the United States are envious of rich, beautiful, better educated California. So let's play this story as a real disaster for all of California. Yes, say it happened in Southern California, but people can fantasize that the quake destroyed countless thousands of homes all over Southern California, and even in the Bay Area, 200 miles to the north. Yes sir, those fornicators who own multi‐ million homes in San Jose, Santa Clara, Sunnyvale, Mt. View, Palo Alto, Menlo Park, Redwood City, Atherton, on up to San Mateo, and even in San Francisco, have finally felt God's wrath. Hopefully, the upstart Stanford University, which spawned Silicon Valley, has been shaken to the ground as well with hundreds killed there. What a load of bull. Today, Sunday, July 7, 2019, KCBS, 740 AM in San Francisco, is saying that Gov. Newsom toured Ridgecrest, Calif. on Saturday, July 6, 2019, and that he was surprised at how little damage there was there. 85% of it is fine. BTW, there have been no fatalities and few serious injuries due to the 7.1 mag. quake on July 5, or the 6.4 mag. one on July 4, 2019. I wonder if the network CBS News will now show Newsom touring the town and saying that. Apparently a lot of Californians have complained about the CBS News' lying coverage of this event. Most viewers of the CBS network news don't have a clear understanding of the layout of California. When one leaves Los Angeles heading north, you cross the Tehachapi Mountains on I‐5, going over "the grapevine", elev. ~2400 feet. On the north side of that, is farm land. One is then in the heavily agricultural San Joaquin Valley. Go far enough north and you reach Bakersfield. The Friday, July 5, 2019 7.1 mag. quake happened north‐east of Bakersfield, north‐east over the very southern‐most reaches of the Sierra Nevada Mountains, in the northern Mojave Desert. There is NOT solid development from Los Angeles north to Bakersfield, with hundreds of hi‐tech companies and thousands of high tech workers. It is mountains and farm land. The quake occurred in the desert town of Ridgecrest, Ca. SO, we, on Manhattan Island, who have never even been to California, and who certainly have never taken a stiff course in Geology, as have I, and who don't know what "USGS" stands for, and have never even heard of Cal Tech, put together a BS story so viewers on the east coast can rejoice that California has FINALLY gotten what it had coming. Just lie to make money. Trump is right about fake news. Maybe he should start talking about the FCC revoking broadcast licenses for that. Another good response, if CBS won't stop lying about this and other events in California, would be for the Governor of California to urge the tech companies here to not locate facilities in New Hampshire, Mass., Conn., New York or New Jersey. Californians could stop spending their tourist dollars in those states too. CBS might dig a little harder for the truth if all of that happened and quit employing so many dedicated liars who appeal to the Ivy league in their stories. This BS story run on the CBS Evening News on Saturday, July 6, 2019 will impact the stock of SV companies when the market opens on Monday, July 8. If the headquarters of Intel, HP, Nvidia, Applied Materials, Apple, Facebook, Micron Tech, Google, Square, YouTube, Twitter, were all destroyed in the July 5 quake, and all of their top people and production people were killed, that will impact their stock price. Too bad that such a scenario is just pure BS put out by the liars at Blackrock. They ought to feel the heat for this BS. Let's have California's congressional delegation start an investigation of the CBS fake news machine and focus on their lying coverage of this quake. Here is the press conference held in Ridgecrest on Saturday, July 6, 2019 after Gov. Newsom toured the area. Well worth watching. See if you get the impression from this press conference that wide‐spread damage occurred throughout California after the Friday, July 5 7.1 mag. quake near Ridgecrest: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C9WAJZ_ALrg I watched the CBS Evening News today, Sunday, July 7, 2019. They still give the false impression of widespread damage throughout at least southern California, in keeping with their policy of dishonest and sensationalist reporting. They showed no part of Gov. Newsom's press conference. LH 1 Brettle, Jessica From:Bay Area Development <badevelopment@gridalternatives.org> Sent:Tuesday, July 9, 2019 2:56 PM To:Council, City Subject:Clean Cars For All Initiative CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. Hello, My name is Philip and I work with Grid Alternatives, an Oakland based non profit organization that is a national leader in helping low‐income communities and communities of color nationwide get clean, affordable solar power and solar jobs through the installation of solar panels. We are currently working on a new project called Clean Cars for All that is an initiative to get low‐income Bay Area residents in communities disproportionately burdened by pollution to retire their older vehicle and replace it with a clean mobility option: Hybrid vehicle, plug‐in hybrid, electric vehicle, or a pre‐loaded clipper card. We are looking to spread the news and get local municipalities to repost our Instagram posts. It would also be helpful if any elected officials could do so as well. Please let me know if it would be possible and if you have any questions. Thank you, Philip 1 Brettle, Jessica From:Wambo The Elder (Fred Meyer Returns) <wambobijou@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, July 5, 2019 11:38 PM To:Rabbi Meyer Cc:info@tehila.gov.il; Rabbi Shulman Subject:Extermination Camps CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. ________________________________ As a Descendant of Abraham Isaac and Jacob, I have to tell those who are Jewish, that if Jews continue to hawk deliberately altered scripture, altered by our stiff necked wayward ancestors whose behavior cut us off from Jerusalem by AD 0135 then our God will Send Us Another Holocaust and Millions will Die Again, and if afterwards we still drag our stubborn ass on the Ground then we can expect another by about AD 2113. Now, if we are actually sparred a Holocaust this time round, in the Fourth Generation beginning in AD 2026, we shall still see the loss of Six Cities in the United States ((San Francisco, San Diego, Chicago, Dallas, New York, Washington DC)) and likely the End of the United States, as a Result of the Consequences of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and Germany will see the Consequences of the Holocaust, and given the Theme of the Present Third Generation, this could mean Germany will see a Vast Influx from an Arab Nation and Germans could become Minorities in their own Homeland, which in turn could ((eventually)) open up the Middle East to Further Expansion by Israel as a Population Vacuum is Created. Still, the Failure to Heed the Evidence of Alterations to Scripture as evidenced by the Dead Sea Scrolls puts Israel in a Vulnerable Position. 1 Brettle, Jessica From:Gordon, Jennifer@CDFA <jennifer.gordon@cdfa.ca.gov> Sent:Tuesday, July 9, 2019 3:01 PM To:recordsunit@cob.sccgov.org; ClerkRecorder@rec.sccgov.org; joseph.deviney@aem.sccgov.org; Helena.Roberts@cep.sccgov.org; Michelle.Thom@cep.sccgov.org; Eric.Wylde@cep.sccgov.org; jon_gundry@sccoe.org; MaryAnn_Dewan@sccoe.org; cyndie.wilks@phd.sccgov.org; angelica.torres@sen.ca.gov; assemblymember.berman@assembly.ca.gov; assemblymember.kalra@assembly.ca.gov; shay.clausen@asm.ca.gov; Fowler, Kent@CDFA; Lyle, Steve@CDFA; Leathers, Jason@CDFA; Condos, Nick@CDFA; Lester Moffitt, Jenny@CDFA; Pegos, David@CDFA; Krout, Natalie@CDFA; Eastman, Hyrum@CDFA; Hornbaker, Victoria@CDFA; Thimmayya, Ned@CDFA; Davis, Cassandra@CDFA; Serrano, Lisa@CDFA; Luna, Bob@CDFA; Galindo, Tina@CDFA; Leclerc, Raymond@CDFA; Richards, Andrew@CDFA; Farnum, Sean@CDFA; Luque- Williams, Magally@CDFA; Khalid, Sara@CDFA; Oriel, Michel@CDPR; Yanga, Nino@CDPR; pispillness@CDPR; Materna, Barbara@CDPH; Beucke, Kyle@CDFA; Weinberg, Justine@CDPH; CDPHPress (OPA); Hutzel, Michelle@EPA; Ting, David@OEHHA; Hirsch, Allan@OEHHA; Burns, Gordon@EPA; Arcus, Amy@OEHHA; Woods, Rima@OEHHA; Eya, Bryan@OEHHA; estrada.fabiola@epa.gov; jenny_marek@fws.gov; Vance, Julie@Wildlife; helene.r.wright@usda.gov; Barbara.e.maehler@usda.gov; David.A.Bergsten@usda.gov; Amy.w.shalom@usda.gov; Danny.J.Hamon@usda.gov; Fell, Evonne@CDFA; Kim, Dave@CDPR; Okasaki, Keith@CDFA; Okimoto, Darrin@CDFA; Farsimadan, Afrooz@Waterboards; Martinez, Armando@Waterboards; Cline, Andrew@CDFA; Spencer, Roger@CDFA; Hatler, Gerald@Wildlife; Shadle, Joshua@Wildlife; katie_zeeman@fws.gov; CDFA_DL_Permits; Moore, Becky@CDFA; Escobar, Alice@CDFA; Nistor, AnaMaria@CDFA; Gutierrez, Antonio@CDFA; Arellano, Vince@CDFA; Tariq, Athar@CDFA; Napolillo, Dayna@CDFA; Gaimari, Stephen@CDFA; Hauser, Martin@CDFA; VanDyke, Jennifer@CDFA; Kress, Joshua@CDFA; Morris, Keith@CDFA; Kelch, Dean@CDFA; Kerr, Peter@CDFA; Kelch, Dean@CDFA; Kodira, Umesh@CDFA; War, Mamadou@CDFA; Krick, Margarete@CDFA; Kaiser, Matt@CDFA; Richmond, Dana@CDFA; Sharma, Nawal@CDFA; So, Song@CDFA; Lee, Cheolmin@CDFA; Van Rein, Jay@CDFA; CDFA_DL_Permits; Lopez-Zuniga, Abraham@CDFA; Sison, Arlene@CDFA; Gray, Cindy@CDFA; Winterton, Shaun@CDFA; Arellano, Vince@CDFA; Irons, Laura@CDFA; Sohal, Janamjeet@CDFA; Cuneo, Terry@CDFA; Huffer, Ben@CDFA; Takahashi, Curtis@CDFA; Council, City; Brettle, Jessica; City Mgr; daustin@pausd.org; vlao@pausd.org; mbuell@cityofepa.org; cmoffice@cityofepa.org; mpineda@ravenswoodschools.org; citycouncil@mountainview.gov; city.clerk@mountainview.gov; cmoffice@cityofepa.org; lmfrench@mtview.k12.ca.us; rluna@mtview.k12.ca.us; council@losaltosca.gov; administration@losaltosca.gov; jmaginot@losaltosca.gov; cjordan@losaltosca.gov; mbirnie@lasdschools.org; jbaier@lasdschools.org; countyclerk@smcgov.org; fcrowder@smcgov.org; JWagner@smcgov.org; JEide@smcgov.org; GIbarra@smcgov.org; MMastrangelo@smcgov.org; nmagee@smcoe.org; kwilliams@smcoe.org; info@smchealth.org; senator.Hill@senate.ca.gov; assemblymember.mullin@assembly.ca.gov Subject:Important PFF Notice of Treatment for Palo Alto, Santa Clara County July 9, 2019 Attachments:PFF-NOT-PaloAltoSantaClaraCounty_2019-07July09sign_ADA.pdf Importance:High CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. Good day Everyone, Please see the attached PFF Notice of Treatment(NOT) for the city of Palo Alto, Santa Clara County, July 9, 2019. We also posted NOT on the CDFA website: 2 https://www.cdfa.ca.gov/plant/PDEP/treatment/treatment_maps.html If you are not the contact for this notice, please forward the attachment to the intended recipient. Thank you, Jennifer Gordon Pest Detection/ Emergency Projects 2800 Gateway Oaks Dr. Sacramento, CA 95833 Main: 916‐654‐1211 Direct: 916‐403‐6814 Fax: 916‐654‐0555 jennifer.gordon@cdfa.ca.gov CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE OFFICIAL NOTICE FOR THE CITY OF PALO ALTO PLEASE READ IMMEDIATELY NOTICE OF TREATMENT FOR THE PEACH FRUIT FLY Collected between June 28, 2019 and July 2, 2019, two peach fruit flies (PFFs), Bactrocera zonata (Saunders), were trapped in the city of Palo Alto, Santa Clara County. Based on the survey data, pest biology, information from the California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) Bactrocera Science Advisory Panel (BacSAP), recommendations provided by the CDFA Primary State Entomologist, and the CDFA “Action Plan for Methyl Eugenol Attracted Fruit Flies including Oriental Fruit Fly Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel),” an infestation of PFF exists in the area. A Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) has been certified which analyzes the PFF treatment program in accordance with Public Resources Code, Sections 21000 et seq. The PEIR is available at http://www.cdfa.ca.gov/plant/peir/. The treatment activities described below are consistent with the PEIR. In accordance with integrated pest management principles, the CDFA has evaluated possible eradication methods and determined that there are no cultural or biological methods available to eliminate PFF from this area. Notice of Treatment is valid until July 2, 2020, which is the amount of time necessary to carry out the treatment plan across three life cycles of PFF as required by the treatment protocol for PFF. The CDFA will employ chemical control as the primary tool, and will additionally use physical control via host fruit removal when there is evidence that a breeding population exists on a property. The treatment plan for the PFF infestation will be implemented as follows: • Chemical Control: The male attractant technique (MAT) will be used to eliminate all sexually-mature male PFFs. MAT applies small bait stations using STATIC™ Spinosad ME, which is a pre-mixed solution containing the attractant methyl eugenol and an organically registered pesticide spinosad, mixed into a waxy time-release matrix (SPLAT®). The methyl eugenol lures male flies to the bait stations, where the flies ingest the insecticide as they feed. The flies are killed when they feed at the stations. In each square mile within the eradication boundary, a targeted density of 600 evenly spaced five- to ten-milliliter bait stations are applied to utility poles, street trees, and other unpainted surfaces using pressurized tree marking guns mounted on specially modified trucks. The bait stations are placed six to eight feet above the ground. The size of the eradication area is defined as that area within 1.5 miles of each detection site, squared off to create a nine-square mile block, and adjusted to use existing features as boundaries, such as roads. Applications are repeated every two weeks for one life cycle if no quarantine is triggered (typically two to three months), and for two life cycles if a quarantine is triggered (typically four to six months). Life cycle durations are dependent on temperature. • Chemical Control: If evidence that a breeding population exists on a property (i.e., immature stages, mated female, or multiple adults are detected), foliar bait treatments may be used within 200 meters of each detection site in order to mitigate the spread of PFF by eliminating those adult life stages not directly affected by MAT (i.e., females and sexually immature males). Foliar bait ground treatments are a protein bait spray that contains an organic formulation of the pesticide spinosad (GF-120 NF Naturalyte® Fruit Fly Bait), and are repeated every seven to 14 days for one life cycle of the fly (typically Peach Fruit Fly Official Notice Project SJ-9818 Page 2 two to three months, dependent on temperature). Please visit the CDFA website to learn more about the treatment process at http://www.cdfa.ca.gov/plant/videos/spinosad/. • Physical Control: If evidence that a breeding population exists on a property (i.e., immature stages, mated female, or multiple adults), all host fruit from each detection site and all properties within a minimum of 100 meters of each detection site may be removed and disposed of in a landfill in accordance with regulatory protocols. Fruit removal will occur once at the beginning of the project, but may be repeated if additional flies are detected. Public Information: For MAT applications in public areas, notification is given to the general public via mass media outlets such as newspapers or press releases. Residents whose property will be treated via foliar bait sprays or host fruit removal will be notified in writing at least 48 hours in advance of any treatment, in accordance with the Food and Agricultural Code sections 5771-5779 and 5421-5436. Following the treatment, completion notices are left with the residents detailing precautions to take and post-harvest intervals applicable to any fruit on the property. Treatment information is posted at http://www.cdfa.ca.gov/plant/pdep/treatment/peach_ff.html. Press releases, if issued, are prepared by the CDFA information officer and the county agricultural commissioner, in close coordination with the project leader responsible for treatment. Either the county agricultural commissioner or the public information officer serves as the primary contact to the media. Information concerning the PFF project shall be conveyed directly to local and State political representatives and authorities via letters, emails, and/or faxes. For any questions related to this program, please contact the CDFA toll-free telephone number at 800-491-1899 for assistance. This telephone number is also listed on all treatment notices. Enclosed are the findings regarding the treatment plan, work plan, map of the treatment area, integrated pest management analysis of alternative treatment methods, and a pest profile. Attachments FINDINGS REGARDING A TREATMENT PLAN FOR THE PEACH FRUIT FLY Collected between June 28, 2019 and July 2, 2019, the California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) confirmed that two peach fruit flies (PFFs), Bactrocera zonata (Saunders), were trapped in city of Palo Alto, Santa Clara County. These detections indicate that a breeding population exists in the area. The PFF is a devastating pest of a wide variety of important fruit and vegetables. · In order to determine the extent of the infestation, and to define an appropriate response area, additional survey took place, centered on the detection site. Based on the survey data, and findings and recommendations from the CDFA Bactrocera Science Advisory Panel (BacSAP), the Primary State Entomologist, the CDFA's "Action Plan for Methyl Eugenol Attracted Fruit Flies including Oriental Fruit Fly Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel)," and County Agricultural Commissioner representatives who are knowledgeable on PFF, I have determined that PFF poses a statewide imminent danger to the environment and economy. The results of the additional survey also indicated that the local infestation is amenable to CDFA's PFF response strategies, which include chemical treatments and removal of host fruit. These options were selected based upon minimal impacts to the natural environment, biological effectiveness, minimal public intrusiveness, and cost. The PFF is an exotic insect which occurs on the mainland of southern Asia from Iran eastward, neighboring islands including Sri Lanka, Philippines, and Taiwan, and the Arabian Peninsula; and in recent years it has invaded North Africa. PFF is known to attack numerous types of fruits and vegetables. Important California crops at risk include apple, avocado, citrus, cucumber, dates, fig, guava, peach, pear, and tomato. Damage occurs when the female lays eggs in the fruit. These eggs hatch into larvae, which tunnel through the flesh of the fruit, making it unfit for consumption. This pest presents a significant and imminent threat to the natural environment, agriculture and economy of California. The combined 2015 gross value of the host commodities is of over $7.5 billion. The permanent establishment and spread of this pest would result in increased production and postharvest costs to safeguard commercial fruit from infestation, increased pesticide applications on both production agriculture and residential properties to mitigate damage, and lost economic activity and jobs from trade restrictions imposed by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and foreign trade partners. This decision to proceed with treatment is based upon a realistic evaluation that it will be possible to eliminate PFF from this area and preven~ its spread using currently available technology in a manner that is based on an action plan develop_ed in consultation with the Pest Prevention Committee of the California Agricultural Commissioners and Sealers Association, the USDA, and scientists on the BacSAP. Due to the size of the infested area and the number of flies detected, historical data indicates that eradication is possible. The first California PFF detections occurred in Los Angeles County in 1984, and since that time, multiple re- introductions have been delimited and successfully eradicated. The CDFA has evaluated possible treatment methods in accordance with integrated pest management (IPM) principles. As part of these principles, I have considered the following 'treatments for control of PFF: 1) physical controls; 2) cultural controls; 3) biological controls; Peach Fruit Fly Notice of Treatment Findings Project SJ-9818 Page2 . . and 4) chemical controls. Upon careful evaluation of each these options, I have determined that it will be possible to address the imminent threat posed by PFF using currently available technology in a manner that is recommended by the BacSAP. Based upon input from the BacSAP, the Primary State Entomologist, USDA experts on PFF, and County Agricultural Commissioner representatives who are knowledgeable on PFF,· I find there are no cultural or biological control methods that are both effective against PFF and allow CDFA to meet its statutory obligations and therefore it is necessary to conduct physical and chemical control methods to abate this threat. As a result, I am ordering that male attractant treatments, consisting of methyl eugenol, a pesticide (spinosad), and a time-release matrix be applied to utility poles and street trees to eliminate this infestation. Additionally, in the event of evidence of a breeding population on a property, foliar bait spray treatments will be applied to host trees using ground-based equipment and host fruit removal will occur. A Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) has been prepared which analyzes the PFF treatment program in accordance with Public Resources Code (PRC), Sections 21000 et seq. The PEIR was certified in December 2014, and is available at http://www.cdfa.ca .gov/plant/peir/. The PEIR addresses the treatment of the PFF at the program level and provides guidance on future actions against the PFF. It identifies feasible alternatives and possible mitigation measures to be implemented for individual PFF treatment activities. The PFF program has incorporated the mitigation measures and integrated pest management techniques as described in the PEIR. In accordance with PRC Section 21105, this PEIR has been filed with the appropriate local planning agency of all affected cities and counties. No local conditions have been detected which would justify or necessitate preparation of a site-specific plan. Sensitive Areas CDFA has consulted with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife's California Natural Diversity Database for threatened or endangered species, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, the National Marine Fisheries Service, and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife when rare and endangered species are located within the treatment area. Mitigation measures for rare and endangered species will be implemented as needed. The CDFA shall not apply pesticides to bodies of water or undeveloped areas of native vegetation. All treatment shall be applied to residential properties, common areas within residential development, non- agricultural commercial properties, and rights-of-way. Work Plan The proposed treatment area encompasses those portions of Santa Clara and San Mateo Counties which fall within a 1.5-mile radius around each property on which an PFF has been detected and any subsequent detection sites within the program boundaries. Notice of Treatment is valid until July 2, 2020, which is the amount of time necessary to carry out the treatment plan across three life cycles of PFF as required by the treatment protocol for PFF. A map of the project boundaries is attached. The work plan consists of the following elements: 1. Delimitation. Traps will be placed in a 4.5-mile radius from each detection site to delimit the infestation and to monitor post-treatment PFF populations. The cardboard Jackson Peach Fruit Fly Notice of Treatment Findings Project SJ-9818 Page 3 sticky trap is baited with the attractant methyl eugenol mixed with the pesticide naled (Dibrom® 8 Emulsive), and the McPhail trap is an invaginated glass flask baited with Torula yeast and borax in water. The Jackson trap is strongly attractive to sexually maturing males, while the McPhail trap is attractive to both sexes of the fly. Jackson traps and McPhail traps will each be placed at a density of 25 per square mile within a 0.5-mile radius of each detection site, and Jackson traps will be placed at a density of five per square mile in the remaining delimitation area going out to 4.5 miles from each detection site. Additional traps may be added to further delimit the infestation and to monitor the efficacy of treatments. These traps will be serviced on a regular schedule for a period equal to three PFF generations beyond the date of the last PFF detected. In addition, host fruit may be sampled for the presence of eggs and larvae in a 200- meter radius around each detection property. 2. Treatment. Any PFF detections within the original and/or expanded eradication area(s) will be treated according to the following protocol. • The male attractant technique (MAT) will be used to eliminate all sexually-mature male PFFs. MAT applies small bait stations using STATIC™ Spinosad ME, which is a pre-mixed solution containing the attractant methyl eugenol and an organically registered pesticide spinosad, mixed into a waxy time-release matrix (SPLAT®). The methyl eugenol lures male flies to the bait stations, where the flies ingest the insecticide as they feed. The flies are killed when they feed at the stations. In each square mile within the eradication boundary, a targeted density of 600 evenly spaced five-to ten-milliliter bait stations are applied to utility poles, street trees, and other unpainted surfaces using pressurized tree marking guns mounted on specially modified trucks. The bait stations are placed six to eight feet above the ground. The size of the eradication area is defined as that area within 1.5 miles of each detection site, squared off to create a nine-square mile block, and adjusted to use existing features as boundaries, such as roads. Applications are repeated every two weeks for one life cycle if no quarantine is triggered (typically two to three months), and for two life cycles if a quarantine is triggered (typically four to six months). Life cycle durations are dependent on temperature. • If evidence that a breeding population exists on a property (i.e., immature stages, mated female, or multiple adults are detected), foliar bait treatments will be used within 200 meters of each detection site in order to mitigate the spread of PFF by eliminating those adult life stages not directly affected by MAT (i.e., females and sexually-immature males). The foliage of host trees and shrubs within 200 meters of each detection site will be treated with an organic formulation of spinosad bait spray (GF-120 NF Naturalyte® Fruit Fly Bait) using hand spray or hydraulic spray equipment. Treatments are repeated every seven to 14 days for one life cycle of the fly (typically two to three months, dependent on temperature). • If evidence that a breeding population exists on a property (i.e., immature stages, mated female, or multiple adults are detected), all host fruit from each detection site and all properties within a minimum of 100 meters of each detection site will be removed and disposed of in a landfill in accordance with regulatory protocols. Fruit removal will occur once at the beginning of the project, but may be repeated if Maximum Program Boundary Proposed 200 Meter Treatment Area Sensitive Environmental Area/Treatment Mitigations In Place Road 44 Road 148 E Walnut Ave S McAuliff St CA-198 Road 152 Avenue 328 Nevada Ave 25th Ave Avenal Cutoff Road Jackson Ave 18th Ave Abbott St River Rd Chualar River Rd US-101 From 37.6582, -122.0179 Fairview Ave to37.6667, -121.9964 Palomares RdFairview AveHayward BlvdCarlos Bee BlvdMission BlvdW Tennyson RdI-880Whipple RdUnion City BlvdArdenwood Blvd CA-84 Palomares Rd Juniper Ave N Winton Way Applegate Rd CA-99 Cressey Way Santa Fe Dr Mercedes Ave Shafter Rd N De Wolf Ave Ashlan Ave N Academy Ave E Shepherd AveCA-168 N Thompson Ave East Herndon Avenue CA-180 The Alameda El Camino Real De La Cruz Blvd W Trimble Rd E Trimble Rd Montague Expy I-880 E Calaveras Blvd W Calaveras Blvd Calaveras Rd Felter Rd Sierra Rd Felton Rd at 37.4122, -121.7814 to Mt Hamilton Rd at 37.3578, -121.7455 Mt Hamilton Rd Quimby Rd Murillo Ave Aborn Rd San Felipe Rd Farnsworth Dr Silver Creek Valley Rd Hellyer Ave Silicon Valley Blvd US-101CA-85 Camden Ave CA-17 I-880 CA-198 Jayne Ave S Derrick Ave W Gale Ave Quebec Ave CA-41 Quail Ave 30th Ave 30th Ave at 36.0213, -120.0036 to Unnamed Dirt Road at 36.0211, -120.0117 Unnamed Dirt Road Milham Ave Unnamed Dirt Road CA-41 I-5 Milham Ave at 36.0007, -120.0016 to Unnamed Dirt Rd at 35.9765, -119.9661 I-5 at 35.9784, -1199569 to Irrigation Canal at 35.9779, -119.9187 Irrigation Canal Racine Ave Racine Ave at 36.0067, -119.9324 to Quebec Ave at 36.0501, -119.9317 N Ashley LnE Ashley LnCA-99Lower Sacramento RdN Lower Sacramento RdPacific AveW Swain Rd N El Dorado StE Alpine Ave SanguinetiLnN Wilson Way E Harding Way Waterloo Rd Cherokee RdW Lathrop RdManthey RdDe Lima RdFrench Camp Rd toSan Joaqun River S Austin RdLathrop RdSan JoaquinRiver Cottage AveHoward RdS RobertsRd E Louise AveN Main StW Undine Rd W Undine Rd at 37.8329,-121.3241 to De Lima Rdat 37.8350, -121.3148 Northgate DrN Union RdW Lathrop RdS AirportWay Duck Creek San Joaquin Main Canal16th St CA-160Northgate BlvdW El Camino AveI-80Business 80 Harbor BlvdIndustrial BlvdLake Washington Rd JeffersonBlvdS River Rd I-5 Business 80S River Rd at 38.5596,-121.5189 to I-5 at38.5596, -121.5141 CA-99E Turner Rd N GuildAve CA-12 Alpine RdE KettlemanLnAlpine RdLive Oak RdCA-99Armstrong RdN DavisRdDavis RdN Davis Rd at38.1964, -121.3358to Mokelumne Riverat 38.1964,-121.3326MokelumneRverMokellumne River at 38.2038,-121.3352 to W Jahant Rd at38.2038, -121.3344 W Jahant Rd E Jahant Rd LowerSacramentoRd E Jahant Rd 99FrontageRdHalley Rd Sievers Rd Pedrick RdMidway RdOdayRdNunes RdNunes RdDixon Ave WestN Meridian RdSweeney RdHigh StCA-61Doolittle Dr W Linne RdGrantLine RdCA-1FasslerAveBaquiano TrailSweeneyRidge TrailSneath LnTrailUnnamedTrailCA-35San BrunoAve WI-280I-380El Camino RealHickey BlvdCA-35 Tank Farm Road Orcutt Rd East Corral de Piedra Creek Carpenter Canyon RdPrice Canyon RdIntersection of Country Club Dr and Davenport Creek Rd to Squire Canyon Rd at 35.1934,-120.6734 Squire Canyon Rd Monte Rd San Luis Bay Dr CA-1 S Higuera St US-101 The PikeCA- 1 Pier AveEnd of Pier Ave to the Pacific Coast at 35.1052, -120.6325 California Aqueduct Old River Rd Del Monte AveArlington BlvdSolano AveSan Pablo AveSan Pablo AveTara Hills DrAppian WayI-80PinoleValley RdCastro RanchRdRanch Rd at 37.953,-122.272 to Del Monte Aveat 37.938, -122.305 I-680CA-24Pleasant Hill RdReliez ValleyRdShangri LaDrEcho Springs Rd at37.927, -122.115 toSunrise Ridge Dr at37.951, -122.116Echo Springs RdSunrise Ridge Dr Hidden PondRdReliez ValleyRd Donegal WayDevon Ave PleasantHill Road Taylor Blvd Sunvalley Blvd I-680 MonumentBlvd Oak GroveRdTreat BlvdBancroftRdYgnacio ValleyRd Palm St W Glaze Ave CA-65 E List Ave 14th Ave E Rocky Hill Dr Yokohl Dr Roa d 228 Avenue 272 E Myer Dr CoastlineCA-37 N AscotPkwy Ascot PkwySprings RdRollingwood DrGlen CoveRoadI-780 W Belmont Ave CA-180 ExitRampI-80MaganizeStSonomaBlvdLemon StEnd of Lemon Stto coastline at38.086,-122.247 Ave 344 Rd 144 Ave 340 E Nebraska AveNebraska Ave Park St McCall Ave S McCall Ave Dry Creek Dr Unnamed Dirt Road Unnamed Dirt Road at 36.4267, -11930057 to Lake Kaweah at 36.4195, -119.0025 Lake Kaweah Shoreline Lake Kaweah at 36.3983, -118.9688 to 36.3561, -118.9695 36.3561, -118.9695 to Sierra Dr at 36.3547, -119.0421 Sierra Dr Mehrten Dr Palm Ave Rd 228 7th Ave Rd 220 Rd 220 at 36.3793, -119.0804 to Rd 220 at 36.3809, -119.0805 Rd 220 Ave 332 Ave 332 at 36.3911, -119.0717 to Ave 335 at 36.3970, -119.0720 Ave 335 Rd 222 Ave 340 Lomitas Dr Lomitas Dr at 36.4065, -119.0556 to Dry Creek Dr at 36.4231, -119.0272 Ave 112 S Karen Rd Unnamed Dirt Rd Firestone Ave CA-198 at 36.11652, -120.37885 to W Lost Hills Rd at 36.11457, -120.34350 W Lost Hills Rd Unnamed Dirt Rd S San Joaquin Ave W Jayne Ave S Calaveras Ave Phelps Ave S San Mateo Ave Ave 440 Gale Ave Rd 96 E Jensen Ave S Clovis Ave E North Ave S Sunnyside Ave E Central Ave S Clovis Ave E Jefferson Ave S Cedar Ave S Railroad Ave E Jensen Ave Bypass W Whitendale Ave S Mooney Blvd Rd 224 Cook Riolo RdAntelope Rd Tupelo DrTupelo Dr at38.7018,-121.3170 toSkylane Dr at38.7009,-121.3148 Skylane Dr Van Maren Ln Calvin Dr Carriage DrKanai AveAuburn Blvd Sycamore DrMariposa AveAntelope Rd Patterson Rd Albers Rd Warnerville Rd Emery RdWamble Rd Orange Blossom RdRodden RdEaton RdStonecreek DrStoneyridge RdCobblestone RdRiver Rock RdFrankenheimer Rd28 Mile RdMettler Rd26 Mile RdLon Dale RdCleveland AveRiver Rd Liberini AveLiberini Ave at37.7755,-120.8671to Walnut St at37.7691,-120.8664 Private RdCrane Rd Orange Belt Hwy Ave 250 Ave 248 Burr Dr Dirt Rd N West St W Oakdale Ave Reservation Rd Rd 80 CA-68 117th Dr 117th Dr at 36.6009,-121.6762 to Ranchito Del Rio Ct at 36.5989,-121.6417 Ave 248 Ranchito Del Rio Ct Rd 68 Ranchito Del Rio Dr Canal at 36.5358,-119.2226 to Rd 176 at 36.5109,-119.1782 Rd 176 Ranchito Dr Piedra Ave Ave 240 Palm St Rd 76 Rd 148 Ave 364 E Shields Ave CA-168 E Shaw Ave N Chestnut Ave CA-65 E Herndon Ave N Palm Ave Unnamed Dirt Rd Unnamed Dirt Rd at 36.08386,-118.98411 to Unnamed Dirt Rd at 36.07839,-118.98407 Unnamed Dirt Rd E Olive Ave E Worth Ave S Plano St Orange Belt Dr Welcome Ave Cairns Ave Unnamed Dirt Rd Unnamed Dirt Rd Pennsylvania Ave CA-65 Unnamed Dirt Rd Unnamed Dirt Rd at 35.71865,-119.02738 to Unnamed Dirt Rd at 35.68763,-119.02746 Unnamed Dirt Rd CA-65 at 35.68427,-119.06809 to Unnamed Dirt Rd at 35.69317,-119.08977 Unnamed Dirt Rd Unnamed Dirt Rd Unnamed Dirt Rd Quality Rd Foothill Blvd 73rd Ave Hart Ave Sunkist Dr Edwards Ave Grapefruit St CA-580 Keller Ave Skyline Blvd at37.7541,-122.11846 toLake Chabot Rd at37.72902,-122.11932Skyline BlvdLake Chabot RdEstudillo AveE 14th StDavis St Railroad Tracks Corral Hollow RdS Lammers Rd CA-205 N MacArthur DrE 11th St Chrisman Rd S Rio Vista Ave E Vino Ave S Reed Ave E Central Ave S Frankwood Ave Goodfellow Ave S Buttonwillow Ave E American Ave Travis Blvd E Manning Ave I-80 N Texas St W Manning Ave Manuel Campos Pkwy Kings River Ave 362 Kings River at 36.6480,-119.4754 to S Rio Vista Ave at 36.6516,-119.4755 Mystic Dr Rd 172 Torrington WayPomfret Ct Ave 360 Pomfret Ct at38.2944,-122.0089 toHuck Rd at 38.28998,-121.98533 Paloma Dr Rd 180 Ave 352 Cottonwood Dr Rd 188 Unnamed Dirt Road Kellogg St Unnamed Dirt Road Cordelia St 328th Ave Ave 328 Rd 168 Comanche Point Rd at 35.1418, -118.7976 to Grasshopper Ln at 35.1145, -118.8412 Ave 328 Rd 156 Ave 352 Woodcreek Oaks Blvd Pleasant Grove BlvdHuck Rd Rd 164 Washington BlvdDiamond Oaks RdHuck Rd at 38.28986,-121.98117 toDriveway at 38.29015,-121.97720 Reserve Dr Roseville PkwyPrivate Driveway Galleria BlvdAtlantic StCement Hill RdPeabody Rd I-80Melody LnAir Base Pkwy Whyte AveRagsdale StDixon Ave Whyte Ave at38.72183, -121.31000to Antelope Rd at38.72403, -121.32754Ragsdale St Antelope RdDixon Ave PFE Rd Alta Ave E Parlier Ave Crawford Ave E Lincoln Ave Alta Ave Petersen RdPetersen Rd at38.24321, -121.96475to Kildeer Rd at38.22805, -121.97039Kildeer RdPotrero Hills LnPotrero Hills Ln at38.21654, -121.98399to Kellogg St at38.23235, -122.03865 Rd 272 Ave 138 Indian Reservation Dr Indian Reservation Dr at 36.02634, -118.92547 to Deer Creek Dr at 35.99354, -118.93533 Deer Creek Dr at 35.99354, -118.93533 to Ave 104 at 35.97869, -118.97421 Ave 104 Rd 256 Ave 116 Laval Rd Del Sol Dr S Wheeler Ridge Rd I-5 Private Rd Unnamed Dirt Rd Canal Canal at 35.16071, -118.79738 to Comanche Point Rd at 35.14194, -118.79755 S Davis Rd Blanco Rd Armstrong Rd McFadden Rd Canal Private Driveway Castroville Rd San Jon Rd San Jon Rd at 36.71867, -121.68754 to San Jon Rd at 36.71874, -121.68310 San Jon Rd Boronda Rd Davis Rd Boronda Rd N Main St E Dinuba Ave Harden Pkwy S Anchor Ave McKinnon St Adams Ave Rd 120 Cabrillo Hwy E Alvin Dr Linwood Dr Ave 468 Dolliver St Unnamed Dirt Rd E Laurel Dr Cabrillo Hwy Ave 280 Hwy 99 Unnamed Dirt Rd at 36.63865, -119.26881 to Rd 144 at 36.62220, -119.25154 Hinds Ave Natividad Rd Sherwood Dr Rd 144 Price Canyon Rd Ave 320 E Front St Ormonde Rd Ave 456 Rd 100 E Alisal St Akers St Ave 143 Unnamed Dirt Rd Rd 143 at 36.60179, -119.25238 to Unnamed Dirt Rd at 36.59088, -119.26918 W Acacia St Noyes Rd Carpenter Canyon Rd Unnamed Dirt Rd Rd 136 Via Chula Robles Verde Canyon Rd Corbett Canyon Rd Hwy 99 W Shaw Ave N Polk Ave E Branch St W Shields Ave Grand Ave N Westlawn Ave W Barstow Ave N Monroe Ave W Herndon Ave N Parkway Dr W Herndon Ave San Miguel Palm St Troy St Lamar St Helix St Kenwood Dr Hwy 94 Sweetwater Springs Blvd Campo Rd Austin Dr Calavo Dr Doubletree Rd Doubletree Rd at 32.72589, -116.95875 to Proctor Valley Rd at 32.66243, -116.96776 Proctor Valley RdMountain Miguel Rd San Miguel Ranch Rd Proctor Valley Rd San Miguel Rd Bonita Rd Sweetwater Rd Briarwood Rd Alsacia St S Woodman St Imperial Ave 65th St Broadway Madera St Massachusetts Ave Edison Rd Private Driveway Miramontes Point Rd Walking Path S Halcyon Rd Coastline Hwy 1 Mirada Rd Green Pl Hwy 1 W El Campo Rd Furtdao LnFurtado Ln at37.49755, -122.45367to Digges Canyon Rd at37.49925, -122.41934 Los Berros Rd Digges Canyon Rd at37.49925, -122.41934to Hwy 92 at 37.48202,-122.40280 Via Concha Rd at 35.026792, -120.561095 to 35.038395, -120.614727 Hwy 92 at 37.48202, -122.40280 to Private Driveway at 37.44074, -122.40777 35.038395, -120.614727 to 35.076286, -120.616489 35.076286, -120.616489 to S Halcyon Rd at 35.083754, -120.589632 Mirada Rd at 37.493106, -122.459532 to Coastline at 37.493012, -122.459843 Cedar St Mary St N Rancho Dr Ash St Unnamed Dirt Road David Rd Unnamed Dirt Road Unnamed Dirt Road Midoil Rd Kern Canyon Rd Unnamed Dirt Road Hwy 178 North St Comanche Dr Kristine St Comanche Dr at 35.38083, -118.85051 to Dirt Road at 35.36929, -118.83448 Wade Ave Unnamed Dirt Road Unnamed Dirt Rd Hwy 33 Hwy 137 Rock Pile Rd Cairns Ave Buena Vista Blvd Main St General Beale Rd Division Rd Old Tulare Hwy Unnamed Dirt Road Hwy 223 Unnamed Dirt Road Mettler Frontage Rd Rd 203 David Rd 2nd Ave S Wheeler Ridge Rd Rd 204 Unnamed Dirt Rd Sebastian Rd Ave 200 Unnamed Dirt Road Rd 172 Bardsley Ave Unnamed Dirt Road Rd 180 Coastline Coast at 33.06786, -117.30685 to W Glaucus St at 33.06805, -117.30592 W Glaucus St N Coast Hwy 101 La Costa Ave El Camino Real Calle Barcelona Manchester Ave S Sabodan St Unnamed Dirt Road San Elijo Ave Unnamed Dirt Road San Elijo Ave at 33.01949, -117.28163 to Coast at 33.01838, -117.28385 I-5 Bernard St I-5 Lomas Santa Fe Dr Highland Dr Via De Fortuna Ave 424 Rd 80 N L St Rd 84 Ave 384 Ave 422 Rd 62 Private Driveway Rd 64 S Golden State Blvd East Ave S Verduga Rd E Linwood Ave S Roselawn Ave W Harding Ave Merced Ave Coffee Rd W Bradbury Rd Griffith Rd 7th Standard Rd Merle Haggard Dr Oslo Rd Manor St Golf Link Rd Canal Fowler Rd Unnamed Dirt Rd Lander AveFowler Rd E Hosking Ave W Bradbury Rd Hwy 99 S Walnut Rd Panama Ln S Tully Rd Mohawk St Rosedale Hwy Rancho Santa Fe Rd South Ave La Costa Ave Fruitvale Ave Circulo Sequoia Lander Ave 10 Oaks Way Avenida Diestro Hetrick Ave Unnamed Dirt Road Willow Rd Snow Rd Copper Crest Rd N Thompson Ave Lone Jack Rd Thompson Ave Lone Jack Rd at 33.05654, -117.22239 to Via De Caballo at 33.05251, -117.22287 Unnamed Dirt Road Via De Caballo Val Sereno Dr Los Morros El Camino Real Rd 40 Ave 404 Rd 48 Ave 384 Rd 40 Ave 376 California Ave 36.47391, -119.50144 to 36.47394, -119.503101 Stockdale Hwy Ave 376 Old River Rd Rd 20 County LineAve 384 Rd 12 County Line Ave 408 36.53223, -119.50347 to 36.53225, -119.49863 Ave 408 Ave 424 Rd 128 Ave 422 Rd 136 Ave 420 Rd 144 Ave 392 Rd 120 Ave 400 Rd 112 Ave 416 Prosperity Ave Rd 132 Rd 114 Olive St Angling Rd Rd 124 Ave 200 Hosfield Dr S K St Bardsley Ave O St E Cross Ave N Mooney Blvd Sycamore Rd S Fairfax Rd Edison Hwy Di Giorgio Rd Bena Rd Edison Rd Muller Rd Bena Rd at 35.32675, -118.74204 to Dirt Road at 35.28231, -118.74392 Mt Vernon Ave Unnamed Dirt Rd Unnamed Dirt Rd Unnamed Dirt Rd Niles St Unnamed Dirt Rd S Oswell St Hwy 58 Union Ave Dirt Road at 35.07172, -120.48836 to 35.06762, -120.45069 35.06762, -120.45069 to Dana Foothill Rd at 35.03813, -120.43806 Dana Foothill Rd Poague Rd Poague Rd at 35.01693, -120.45155 to Borega Ln at 35.01098, -120.45370 Borega Ln Cherry Blossom Pl Orchard Rd Faith Dr Faith Dr at 35.00588, -120.46895 to Riverside Rd at 35.00255, -120.47279 Riverside Rd at 35.00255, -120.47279 to Division St at 35.00641, -120.50342 Division St Unnamed Dirt Rd La Cumbre Ln N Las Flores Dr Osage St Mesa Rd Unnamed Dirt Rd Olympic Way Pomeroy Rd Glenhaven Pl MorrisonCanyon Rd Morrison Canyon Rd at 37.57056,-121.95168 to Morrison CanyonRd at 37.57699, -121.93080 Morrison Canyon Rd at37.57699, -121.93080 to37.54883, -121.89285 37.54883, -121.89285 toMill Creek Rd at 37.53478,-121.88967Mill Creek RdSpringValley TrailSpring Valley Trail at37.52473, -121.90414to Vista Grande Ter at37.52155, -121.90877Vista Grande TerVista Grande CtHunter LnView Point Cir View Point Cir at 37.51798, -121.91355 to Chantecler Dr at 37.51708, -121.91397 Chantecler DrMission BlvdDurham RdOsgood RdWashington BlvdEugene StLeslie StBaylis StPaseo PadrePkwyStevensonBlvdGuardino DrWalnut Ave Adobe Creek Loop Trail San Antonio Rd Hwy 101 Ramp Hwy 101 Rengstoff Ave El Camino Real San Antonio RdPine Ln Pine Ln at 37.39211, -122.12731 to Foothill Expy at 37.39254, -122.12939 Foothill Expy Page Mill Rd Peter Coutts Rd Stanford Ave Bowdoin Ln Campus Dr Galvez St Embarcadero Rd Alma St University Ave Middlefield Rd Woodland Ave Menalto Ave Okeefe St Willow Rd Newbridge St Bay Rd Shoreline Peach Fruit Fly Eradication Project Palo Alto, Santa Clara & San Mateo Counties 2019 0 0.5 1 1.5 mi ERADICATION PROJECT WORK PLAN FOR METHYL EUGENOL RESPONDING EXOTIC FRUIT FLIES (Includes Bactrocera correcta, Bactrocera dorsalis group, and Bactrocera zonata) DETECTION 1. Detection Trapping The California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) maintains a cooperative State/County trapping program for the various fruit flies to provide early detection of any infestation in the State. Traps are serviced by either County or State personnel and funded by the Department. The program uses two types of traps: the cardboard Jackson sticky trap baited with the attractant methyl eugenol mixed with the pesticide naled (Dibrom® 8 Emulsive), and the McPhail trap, an invaginated glass flask baited with Torula yeast and borax in water. The Jackson trap is strongly attractive to sexually maturing males, while the McPhail trap is attractive to both sexes of the fly. Traps are hung from branches of host trees at specified densities in susceptible areas of California. County or State employees inspect these traps weekly or bi-weekly throughout the year in southern California and from April or May through October or November in northern California. 2. Intensive Trapping Intensive trapping is triggered after a single fly is caught. Following confirmation of the specimen, trap densities will be increased over an 81-square mile area centered on the detection. Within the next 24 hours, 25 Jackson and McPhail traps are placed in the square mile core around each find. Five Jackson traps are placed in each mile of the remaining delimitation area. Traps in the core will be checked daily during the first week. Traps in the first buffer zone will be serviced every two days; those in the remainder of the delimitation area are checked at least once during the first week. All traps in the delimitation zone will be checked weekly following a week of negative trap catches. Intensive trapping ends after the third complete life cycle following the last fly find. This time period is determined by a temperature-dependent developmental model run by the Pest Detection/Emergency Projects Branch in Sacramento. 3. Post-Treatment Monitoring The success of the eradication program is monitored by intensive trapping levels for three life cycles of the fly after the last fly has been detected. If no flies are caught during that time, trap densities return to detection levels. 4. Larval Survey Fruit on a property where a fly has been trapped may be inspected for possible larval infestation. Small circular oviposition scars are occasionally visible indicating an infested fruit. Fruit on properties adjacent to a trap catch may also be inspected. If two or more flies are trapped close to each other, fruit cutting may be extended to all properties within a 200-meter radius of the finds, concentrating on preferred hosts. 1 Brettle, Jessica From:Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org> Sent:Thursday, July 4, 2019 4:31 PM To:Loran Harding; dennisbalakian; David Balakian; Dan Richard; kfsndesk; newsdesk; kwalsh@kmaxtv.com; Council, City; Mayor; margaret-sasaki@live.com; Mark Kreutzer; Mark Standriff; huidentalsanmateo; terry; Cathy Lewis; bballpod; Joel Stiner; vallesR1969@att.net; Doug Vagim; Daniel Zack; Steve Wayte; robert.andersen Subject:Fwd: Good info on the July 4, 2019 quake in Calif. CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Forwarded message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ From: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org> Date: Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 4:21 PM Subject: Fwd: Good info on the July 4, 2019 quake in Calif. To: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Forwarded message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ From: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org> Date: Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 4:13 PM Subject: Fwd: Good info on the July 4, 2019 quake in Calif. To: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Forwarded message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ From: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org> Date: Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 4:02 PM Subject: Good info on the July 4, 2019 quake in Calif. To: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org> Thurs. July 4, 2019 To all‐ Here is good info on today's quake: https://heavy.com/news/2019/07/california‐earthquake‐today‐map‐damage‐magnitude/ And: https://www.usgs.gov/news/update‐magnitude‐64‐earthquake‐southern‐California 2 And here is a great map. Note especially the path of the San Andreas, the red line. You see where and where not to buy a house(s). Wait till they get an 8.0 on the San Andreas on the peninsula again. Expensive damage. Hope they all have EQ insurance. https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/map/#%7B%22autoUpdate%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22basemap%22%3A% 22terrain%22%2C%22feed%22%3A%22ci38443183%22%2C%22listFormat%22%3A%22default%22%2C%22mapposition %22%3A%5B%5B34.72129745316466%2C‐119.33898925781251%5D%2C%5B36.00467348670187%2C‐ 116.70227050781248%5D%5D%2C%22overlays%22%3A%5B%22plates%22%5D%2C%22restrictListToMap%22%3A%5B %22restrictListToMap%22%5D%2C%22search%22%3A%7B%22id%22%3A%22ci38443183%22%2C%22isSearch%22%3At rue%2C%22name%22%3A%22Search%20Results%22%2C%22params%22%3A%7B%22endtime%22%3A%222019‐07‐ 25T17%3A33%3A49.040Z%22%2C%22latitude%22%3A35.7051667%2C%22longitude%22%3A‐ 117.506%2C%22maxradiuskm%22%3A250%2C%22minmagnitude%22%3A3%2C%22starttime%22%3A%222019‐06‐ 13T17%3A33%3A49.040Z%22%7D%7D%2C%22sort%22%3A%22newest%22%2C%22timezone%22%3A%22utc%22%2C% 22viewModes%22%3A%5B%22list%22%2C%22map%22%5D%2C%22event%22%3Anull%7D The quake must certainly have been felt in Visalia and Bakersfield. LH LH 1 Brettle, Jessica From:Rainer Pitthan <Rainer.Pitthan@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, July 4, 2019 2:12 AM To:emily@qwhlobby.com Cc:oppenpitt@earthlink.net; Lydia Kou; Fred Balin; Doria Summa; Paul Machado Subject:Opposition letter to SB592 and SB330 is attached Attachments:sb50CrisRainer.pdf CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. Hello, please find my stated opposition, and a few supporting thoughts. Regards Rainer Pitthan mailto:rainer@pitthan.com ---this is not a US Government supported domain, true and nasty political comments are given and are welcome--- https://stanford.io/2Mqa8mJ (650)327-9497 157 S. California Ave., #H-100 Palo Alto CA 94306 USA Cell Rainer: (650)380-4823 Rainer Pitthan, Rainer.Pitthan@GMail.com I oppose SB592, the new camouflaged version of SB50, by Scott Wiener, and SB330 by Nancy Skinner. I oppose taking local control away from residents and local authorities and giving it to for-profit developers. Because, worldwide experience has shown, that local control is best for the local population, see more details below. I have lived in Palo Alto since 1978. Starting maybe 1995 developers have for basically bribed City Council members to approve unlimited construction commercial office space, by donating tens of thousands of $ for election campaigns. Those City Councilors were not embarrassed to call buildings in prime locations with 20,000 sqft of office space, and only two luxury condominiums, “mixed use”. It has taken 50 years to create this problem, it will take another 50 to remedy it. The fight against too many jobs in Palo Alto, and not enough housing, has only begun with elections about 5 years ago, and is now well under way with commercial building caps finally introduced. Friends in San Francisco (Faculty members at UCSF) showed me likewise (follow the money they said) that building interests have been buying off Assembly members like Scott Wiener, who seem to be mostly interested in personal power. I do not want for-profit developers to be empowered by SB592 and SB330, or any other crooked law, to reshape our town, to negate the process Palo Alto has made for a better building process. Lack of affordable housing has become an international problem. Some of it in the US comes from increased demand in space: the average house size in 1945 in the US was 1000 sqft; now it is 2,700 sqft. The average household size went down from 3.6 to 2.5 people. The worldwide experience is that efforts to force affordable housing construction (BMR = Below Market Rate) centrally from above, without the cooperation and the knowledge of local experts, including the leadership of non-profit mutual building associations, leads to the abominable results we see in US Projects, British Community Estates, French HLM, etc. That does not even mention the catastrophe of Soviet style central decisions in housing, which even in countries with traditional high standards (East Germany), have led to dismal results. And then there is Japan to consider: intensification of housing (higher density) follows rules which are negotiated often block-wise by neighbors). This decentralized concept would not have been alien to New England settlers 250 years ago. In Europe, building mass housing around Rail Road Stations (and other traffic hubs) is seen as a one-way ticket to insanity, because (a) it crams construction onto the most expensive real estate in town (Wide sidewalks? Forget it!), and (b) where is the commuter going to go after arriving at another train station with BMR housing: another apartment? It will lead neither to Jane Jacobs’ beautiful cities, nor to Le Corbusier’s walkable cities of New Urbanism. However, it will lead to maximizing profits, and so the building industry is all for it. The most successful BMR efforts in OECD countries seem to be the German, Dutch, and Scandinavian (the Nordic Block) approach; where within the framework of their social market economy (Friedrich Hayek’s Ordo Liberalism) Mutual Non-profit Building Associations are the developers. It cuts out the for-profit developers, who naturally cannot compete on price; their profit prevents it. Non-profit here just means that the 30% profit, which flows into the pockets of private developers, is used as starting capital to build more BMR housing, and not take it out circulationn for private enrichment. In the next step of progress local utilities and building associations join forces. In Germany (which I know best) a well-known example is the Hessian City of Darmstadt, the town of the Architect Peter Behrens (the teacher of Le Corbusier, Mies van der Rohe, and Walter Gropius). Here the former Arbeiter Bauverein (Workers Building Association of 1864, now Bauverein AG) and the local Hessian Electricity AG (HEAG) have joined to create the starting capital. The CEO of the combined enterprise is a “Dr. Ing.”, who as a Diplom Wirtschafts Engineer (literally a graduate industrial engineer) has a hybrid degree of an Economist and an Engineer. Since Darmstadt has built up its BMR apartment stock since 1864, they now own 16,000 Apartments in a city of 150,000 people. And this despite Darmstadt being destroyed by Anglo-American Terror bombing to 80% in WW2. But Darmstadt, governed by Social Democrats being not in the pocket of local builders, has never allowed the run-away office construction by for-profit companies we see in California. As always in BMR projects rehabilitation and preservation of existing affordable housing is a continuous hand-to-hand combat, as is the adjusting of rent depending on changing income of renters, creating and maintaining vibrant mixed income neighborhoods. This only can be done locally. We all know the terrible consequences the Thatcherism inspired ‘right to buy’ ideology had in Britain. By nationally forbidding that the profit made, from the sale of the estate housing in the 1980’s, was used to build more houses, and by even confiscating the profits by the treasury, of BMR housing stock all but disappeared and new stock was not created. The profits from the “right-to-buy” sales were used by Thatcher for trickle down tax cuts. Sounds familiar? A final remark: the “Nordic” system for below market rate housing is a take-off of the Nordic Block’s health insurance system. The insurance entities were original thousands of local (now often regional, but never national) non-profit guild based mutual sickness funds, which like any mutual association are run by the members, thus off-the-bat lowering the cost by the 30% of profits which US Health Insurances take out. And operating for the interests of the members and not the profit of the companies keeps premiums low. Regarding the economic Cooperation between Building Associations and Utilities, Palo Alto with a local Housing Authority and a local Community Utility Company (which produces a return-on-investment – Dividends) could easily do that. As an example, Palo Alto in 1987 already introduced a Utility Users Tax to support in a clever maneuver the Palo Alto School District. 1 Brettle, Jessica From:Sallyann Rudd <sallyann_r@yahoo.com> Sent:Friday, July 5, 2019 7:15 AM To:Council, City; City Mgr Cc:Historic Resources Board Subject:Post Office / Hamilton St CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. Dear City Council and City Manager I emailed the City Manager about 2 weeks ago about the dire state of the downtown Post Office on Hamilton. If you have not walked past it lately, please do so. It is in a very poor state. The building itself is looking very run down and neglected. The landscaping is also in an appalling state, lots of dead debris, dead grass. It looks like a derelict building right in the heart of downtown. As you all know, this is a historic Birge Clark building and it has a prominent position in our downtown. It seems that the inside corridors are not being swept either, they are full of old leaves. The window boxes need urgent cleaning out or the volunteer yucca in there will damage the building. Thank you Sally‐Ann Rudd 2 3 4 1 Brettle, Jessica From:ron ito <wsrfr418@yahoo.com> Sent:Thursday, July 4, 2019 10:35 AM To:Council, City Subject:Pothole city... CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. potholes all over the place. Big chucks of asphalt missing here and there. I know that Cal Trans is in charge of El Camino but at least repair the major ones since the rainy season is now over. I don't even travel at night anymore since I am afraid of hitting one. Not exactly what I would expect for one of the most affluent areas in CA. 1 Brettle, Jessica From:David Cox <dcoxforcouncil@guffy.net> Sent:Tuesday, July 9, 2019 8:40 AM To:David Cox Subject:Thank You for Your Support! CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. ________________________________ Hello everyone, This week I filed to run for re‐election to Raleigh City Council, District B. Four years ago I ran for Council as part of a grassroots campaign to bring better representation to District B to balance the interests of developers with the interests and concerns of residents. Today I look back on the past few years and hope you will agree about the progress that has been made. Over the past four years I have attended about 200 Citizens Advisory Council meetings, innumerable community meetings, and meetings with individual constituents about a myriad of concerns. I have pioneered the use of social media both for community discussions about issues and as a way to stay in contact with elected leaders and government officials. I have not missed a single City Council or Committee meeting. I hear your voices and share your concerns about growth and development, the environment, our roads and infrastructure, our fire and police, and the impacts to our neighborhoods and quality of life. I have worked hard not only to be your voice on Council but to get the votes needed to address your concerns. And we are having an impact. Council changed dramatically in the last election. There is now a majority on Council working in the interests of people and neighborhoods. Because of this impact, we expect well organized, well funded challenges in this upcoming election. With your continued support through volunteerism and contributions, we can get out the vote this October! For the past four years and for your help in this campaign, I thank you! Only together can we continue what we started in 2015. To stay connected and to get involved, here is some contact information: Website: http://www.dcoxfourcouncil.com Contributions: http://dcoxforcouncil.com/contribute/ Volunteer: http://dcoxforcouncil.com/volunteer/ Email: dcoxforcouncil@gmail.com Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/dcoxforcouncil/ And, to opt out of these emails, please use this link: http://www.guffy.net/unsubscribe.html Together we are making a difference! Best, 2 David Cox Candidate for Re‐Election to Raleigh City Council, District B Paid for by the Committee to Elect David Cox 1 Brettle, Jessica From:Suzanne Keehn <dskeehn@pacbell.net> Sent:Friday, July 5, 2019 11:45 AM To:Council, City Subject:Fw: Why San Francisco techies hate the city they transformed CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links. Please Read. I don't think we want the same in Palo Alto. Suzanne Keehn 4076 Orme 94306 - ----- Forwarded Message ----- From: Pat Marriott <patmarriott@sbcglobal.net> To: Pat Marriott <patmarriott@sbcglobal.net> Sent: Friday, July 5, 2019, 10:01:28 AM PDT Subject: Why San Francisco techies hate the city they transformed https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/realestate/we-all-suffer-why-san-francisco-techies-hate-the-city- they-transformed/ar-AADGohK -- Sent from Lydia’s Mobile