Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout20191104plCC 701-32 DOCUMENTS IN THIS PACKET INCLUDE: LETTERS FROM CITIZENS TO THE MAYOR OR CITY COUNCIL RESPONSES FROM STAFF TO LETTERS FROM CITIZENS ITEMS FROM MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS ITEMS FROM OTHER COMMITTEES AND AGENCIES ITEMS FROM CITY, COUNTY, STATE, AND REGIONAL AGENCIES Prepared for: 11/04/2019 Document dates: 10/16/2019 – 10/23/2019 Set 1 Note: Documents for every category may not have been received for packet reproduction in a given week. 1 Brettle, Jessica From:HRC Sent:Friday, October 18, 2019 2:12 PM To:Council, City Cc:Youth Council; board@pausd.org; daustin@pausd.org; council@paloaltopta.org; Philippe Rey Subject:Letter from the Palo Alto Human Relations Commission to City Council on youth vaping Attachments:HRC Letter to Council on youth vaping - 10-18-19.pdf; ACS Vaping Presentation @ September 2019 HRC mtg,.pdf; 9 - September 12, 2019 HRC Minutes.pdf Dear Mayor Filseth and Council,  Please see the attached letter to the Council from the Human Relations Commission (HRC) regarding  youth vaping.  Kind Regards,  Minka van der Zwaag  HRC staff liaison  Link to September 12, 2019 HRC meeting video:  https://midpenmedia.org/human‐relations‐commission‐30‐09122019/  Minka van der Zwaag  Manager, Office of Human Services  4000 Middlefield Rd. T2 | Palo Alto, CA 94303 650‐463‐4953 | minka.vanderzwaag@cityofpaloalto.org Please think of the environment before printing this email – Thank you  Youth Vaping Kyle Greenman, M.S. Samantha Rivas, M.A. Adolescent Counseling Service Adolescent Substance Abuse Treatment Adolescent Counseling Services (ACS) ●We work with youth 13-24 years old to develop leadership, engage in youth-focused research, shape and change communities at the policy while providing essential counseling services ●Founded in 1975 serving San Mateo and Santa Clara Counties in multiple locations ●Programs focusing on: ○Community Counseling ○On-campus Counseling ○LGBTQQ+ Empowerment (OUTLET) ○Adolescent Substance Use Treatment (ASAT) Adolescent Substance Abuse Program (ASAT) ●Outpatient substance use treatment, tailored to individual and family needs, using a harm-reduction approach focused on family involvement ●A comprehensive approach integrating: ○Substance Use Assessment ○Individual & Family Psychotherapy ○Teen & Parent Support Groups ○Regular Urinalysis Screenings ●Alternative to Suspension Program implementation and support for several local school districts VAPING | Agenda What is Vaping? Vapes: Design & Contents Impacts: Medical & Social Reasons For Vaping Treatment & Intervention Q & A What Is Vaping? ●E-cigarettes & vapes are designed to deliver nicotine, cannabis, flavorings, and other additives to the user via an inhaled aerosol. ●Since 2014, they have been the most commonly used tobacco product among U.S. youth. ●Most vape products contain nicotine – an addictive chemical found in traditional cigarettes, cigars, pipes and smokeless tobacco products. Vape Designs & Technology JUUL 600% surge in JUUL sales from 2016 to 2017 Most Commonly Used Vaping Device Locally Based Pax Technologically Innovative Connected Apps Gamification Technology 1 Brettle, Jessica From:herb <herb_borock@hotmail.com> Sent:Monday, October 21, 2019 12:28 PM To:Council, City; Clerk, City Subject:October 21, 2019 Council Meeting, Item #5: Amendment to Contract Number C18171717 CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.  Herb Borock  P. O. Box 632  Palo Alto, CA 94301    October 21, 2019    Palo Alto City Council  250 Hamilton Avenue  Palo Alto, CA 94301      OCTOBER 21, 2019 CITY COUNCIL MEETING, AGENDA ITEM #5  AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT NUMBER C18171717      Dear City Council:    Please remove this item from your agenda during "Agenda Changes, Additions and Deletions", because the agenda description fails to inform the public about the purpose of this agenda item's contract.    Contrast the agenda description for the Item #5 contract with the agenda descriptions for the contracts that are the subject of Item #4 and Item #6.    The agenda description for Item #4 informs the public that the contract is "to Construct the Secondary Clarifiers No. 4 and No. 6 Mechanisms Replacement Project at the Regional Water Quality Control Plant".    The agenda description for Item #6 informs the public that the contract is "for Expansion of the Valet Parking Program to California Avenue Parking Facilities".    The agenda item description for Item #5 has no equivalent information to inform the public about the contract's purpose.    The omission of the purpose of the contract in Item #5, whether inadvertent or intentional, creates a double bind for those who have determined the purpose of the contract and plan to attend the Council 2 meeting to speak about the contract, including those who want you to approve the contract.    If you remove Item #5 from your agenda to comply with the Brown Act, then those who want you to approve the contract tonight would have to attend another meeting to ensure that you act on the contract to their satisfaction, although they could still speak during Oral Communications tonight.    If you leave Item #5 on the agenda, any action you do take would be subject to challenge due to the defective agenda description.    Thank you for your consideration of these comments.    Sincerely,    Herb Borock            1 Brettle, Jessica From:Ann Kane <lexafk@gmail.com> Sent:Wednesday, October 16, 2019 2:00 PM To:Council, City Subject:RPP for Old Palo Alto CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.  We write today in strong support of the Residential Parking Permit program for Old Palo Alto.      Residents of the neighborhood since 2013, we've seen our own access to reasonable parking space shrink dramatically  since we moved in. Our ability to leave our house and return to an allotted space out front has devolved into having to  park sometimes blocks away from home, taking two and three trips to the car to retrieve groceries, etc. We've seen  neighbors facing the same issues while attempting to safely escort small children back and forth. Non‐residents' day‐ long parking up and down our streets has made a significant, daily impact on our ability to our basic rights as residents  to safely come and go as needed.     We appreciate your attention to the careful and thorough process that's taken place thus far, and urge you to approve  the RPP when it comes up for a vote.     Thank you for your consideration,     Ann and George Kane  160 Washington Avenue       1 Brettle, Jessica From:Sheri Furman <sheri11@earthlink.net> Sent:Wednesday, October 16, 2019 2:36 PM To:Council, City Subject:Letter re Oct 21 Agenda Item 10 Attachments:Old Palo Alto RPP Pilot Letter.docx CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.  Please see the attached letter from PAN regarding next Monday's Council meeting. Thanks, sheri Re: Old Palo Alto RPP Pilot October 16, 2019 Dear Mayor Filseth and Council Members: The PAN Executive Committee has been in conversation with the residents in Old Palo Alto (“OPA”). Even though the RPP to be discussed at the October 21st City Council meeting does pertain to only one neighborhood, PAN believes that parking is of interest to all residents and is therefore a Palo Alto-wide concern. With this in mind, the PAN executive committee, as well as the PAN membership, overwhelmingly support Council giving prompt approval of the Old Palo Alto RPP pilot as described in the staff report. Why does PAN join OPA residents in advocating for the RPP? • The portion of Old Palo Alto nearest the California Avenue tunnel experiences significant parking intrusion due to Caltrain commuters and spillover from the adjacent Evergreen-Mayfield RPP. • Residents have been working with the city on this problem since 2017. • Resident support for this RPP is overwhelming and consistent: o Aug 2018 Resident petition shared with PTC in March 2019: 91% favorable with 72% participation rate o Aug 2019 City survey results: 89% favorable with 59% participation rate • Staff occupancy studies demonstrate parking in boundary areas is a real and significant problem, with some streets at 100% capacity. • Residents, who have not been not been overly prescriptive/demanding regarding a particular approach, support the staff recommendations. • Delaying a November implementation for the RPP pilot is unfair to residents: o Residents have played by all the rules, as outlined in the municipal code. o Implementation of a pilot should not be held hostage for policy questions and/or analytical rigor beyond what has been expected of other RPPs. Residents were emailed the municipal code and told to follow the process, which they did. o Staff has said any further delay would push the pilot implementation date to March 1st (unnecessary as well as unfair). o As this is a pilot, changes can be made as appropriate (as they have for other RPPs). o Consistency in approach and adherence to the municipal code and existing RPP process that residents were asked to follow should be respected. Frankly, we see no possible reason not to approve the pilot program. We urge you to do the right thing and approve it. Kind regards, Becky Sanders Sheri Furman PAN Co-chairs 1 Brettle, Jessica From:Barbara Carlitz <barbara.carlitz@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, October 18, 2019 2:02 PM To:Council, City Subject:our RPP request.... CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on  links.  ________________________________  Dear Council Members,  Fortunately I have been able to meet personally with a number of you and find that you are sympathetic to the parking  problem our little corner of Old Palo Alto is facing.  Before you discuss and vote this evening, I’d like to emphasize a few  aspects to our appeal.  1) We are a small neighborhood of very small lots, small garages, and small property frontages, unlike most of Old Palo Alto.  2) Our neighborhood is wedged against Oregon, Alma, the train tracks, and California Avenue’s very busy bike lane.  We are impacted by Caltrain parking and California Avenue employee parking — all the other neighborhoods which ring that  area already have their own RPP programs.  3) We have jumped through all the hoops in the rule book, and have an extremely high percentage of affected property owners voting " yes” to the pilot program before you tonight.  4) This is a one year pilot:  we have been flexible as to terms and we remain so.  If this is the best time to consider city wide codification of such programs, please let us begin our pilot NOW and experience some relief while modifications or  alternatives are under consideration.  Thank you.  Barbara Carlitz  {REDACTED}  1 Brettle, Jessica From:George Herman <george.e.herman@gmail.com> Sent:Sunday, October 20, 2019 4:22 PM To:Council, City Subject:RPP for Old Palo Alto CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.  Dear City Council    I understand that you will be addressing the above topic on October 21st.  I am in strong support of the RPP program for  Old Palo Alto.  In fact, I was one of the original residents to start the process back in 2017.  We’ve been extremely  patient during this time as the problems continue to worsen.  We have watched as safety issues have increased and  living conditions worsened (children biking to school during hours of increased traffic, bike accidents due to  incursions, decrease in quality of life due to the increased noise, traffic and pollution).     There were 3 concerns raised by the original petition, and I like to note that one of these major concerns has not  addressed. That is the parking on High Street by Bowdoin Park. There is a dangerous situation where there are bikes  coming off Oregon and coming down High Street and while at same time commuters are rushed looking for parking and  quickly leaving their parked cars for the train. The commuters are in such a rush that they are not looking out for the  bikes. If a car comes down High Street looking for parking, they have to turn around at the dead end of the street.  School age children ride their bikes down the street.  Neither of these scenarios are safe.    The people on High Street have suggested numerous times to use the parking at Bowdoin Park for employee parking for  California Ave instead of commuters. This was the original intent of the petition of asking for 20 permits for employee  parking. Now we find that the parking at Bowdoin Park is NOT included in the RPP. This action completely ignores one of  the original concerns we voiced in the petition…. the one of safety. There are other major safety issues that the city  continues to ignore around the underpass at California Avenue. There have been a number of accidents over the last 9  months as direct result of ignoring these safety issues. (These accidents required an ambulance to respond.) The  problem is getting worse and not better!    It is time that the City Council take action on this issue and other issues in order to avoid any future safety problems and  make Old Palo Alto, once again, an enjoyable place to live.    Thanks    ‐George    To illustrate what we have to tolerate on High Street here are two pictures.    The first is a panorama standing at the front of my house. It’s taken around noon and looks the same on any weekday.  All parking spots are taken by 9:00 AM each day. You can imagine the traffic jam that occurs daily from approximately  8:00 to 9:00AM looking for parking.    The other picture was taken on March 11th 2003 at 12:15PM from across the street and front of the house. As you can  clearly see, there are no cars parked in either the park or in front of the house. I moved here in 1996. The neighborhood  was not over ridden with cars until the past ~5 years.      2         1 Brettle, Jessica From:Fred Balin <fbalin@gmail.com> Sent:Saturday, October 19, 2019 9:44 PM To:Council, City Subject:10_21_19 Council Agenda, Item 11 - CAO Public Employee Performance Evaluation – City Attorney Attachments:Fred Balin CC 10_21_19 Item 11.pdf CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on  links.  ________________________________    Comments in Attached PDF.    ‐Fred Balin  2385 Columbia Street    Fred Balin 2385 Columbia Street Palo Alto, CA 94306 fbalin@gmail.com October 19, 2019 Palo Alto City Council 250 Hamilton Avenue Palo Alto, CA 94301 Re: October 21, 2019 Council Agenda, Item 11 CAO Public Employee Performance Evaluation – City Attorney September 9, 2019 Citizen’s Investigation provided to you in printed form and also available in digital format at fredbalin.org March 19, 2018 City Attorney Assessment made at City Council meeting, Item 14: Annual Code Update (Continued Item) March 5, 2018, My Formal Complaint submitted at City Council Meeting, Item 16: Annual Code Update and regarding Michael Alcheck’s participation at the November 29, 2017 PTC meeting Council Members: In late February 2018, I learned of the intersection of Planning and Transportation Commissioner Michael Alcheck’s economic interests with two adjacent Palo Alto residential properties and three sections of the municipal code: “Contextual Garage Placement,” definition of “Carport,” and definition of “Garage.” Two and a half months prior to that, on November 29, 2017, these three municipal code items had come to the Commission after applications to convert a carport to a garage on each property had been submitted, but no permits had yet been issued. This nexus was the crux of my formal two-page complaint, a violation of the Political Reform Act and a common law appearance of impropriety, that I presented to the City during the March 5, 2018 Council meeting agenda item that included these three code sections following the Commission’s hearings (Formal Complaint printed in Investigation, Appendix H). At the continued, March 19, 2018 Council meeting on this agenda item, and in response to a question from Councilmember Karen Holman, City Attorney Molly Sump stated: “That governmental decision that was before PTC in December and January concerned the following issue: a staff proposal to make more strict the application of the Contextual Garage Placement rule to clarify that it would also prohibit the placement of a carport in the front portion of the lot where the predominant, the prevailing pattern on the block, was not for that, was for rear placement. There was no commissioner who had a financial interest, a property interest that would foreseeably and materially be impacted by that question, and the Planning and Transportation Commission, in fact, advised, consistent with the staff recommendation that the rule be made more strict, and that is the item before you tonight, there is no conflict, you can consider that question and proceed.” (Investigation Page 81). Over the next 18 months, I conducted extensive, additional research into this entire matter and wrote the investigation report. In it I explained my disagreement with the specific argument above. It is true that the staff recommendation did make the code “stricter,” but it could have been made even stricter by preventing further enclosure of properties where the owners had taken advantage of the loophole in the wording of the Contextual Garage Placement code as it applied to carports, such as in the case of Alcheck’s two properties. This would have been even more likely if Alcheck’s economic interests were known to the commission and the public. With that revealed together with my formal complaint two weeks prior, Holman presented such an amendment at the March 19, 2018 meeting. Although it did not pass (only 5 council members were present), it demonstrated, by logical extension, that something similar could have been presented at the Commission hearings as well, and therefore Commissioner Alcheck had a conflict of interest. Also, staff’s proposed changes to the council of the definition of “carport” was “less strict” (weaker) than what staff had presented to the Commission. Staff’s proposal to the Commission, if ultimately enacted, would have removed staff’s classification of Alcheck’s parking structures as carports.1. Alcheck pushed against this proposal, and as a result, staff removed this change prior to the next meeting. In other words, he directly impacted the discussion in favor of his economic interests. The clarity of Alcheck’s conflict in 2017 was also highlighted by an email from Alcheck’s sister, Ronit Bodner, to the Commission objecting to the changes in all three code sections (Email printed in Investigation, Appendix G). She wrote under her married name with no address provided and without mention of specific properties. Yet she was a managing member of Alcheck Investments LLC, which owned one of the two properties and in which Michael Alcheck had a stake (as indicated on his FPPC form 700 filings). As managing member, Alcheck’s sister had an ownership interest, participated in the day-to-day management, and had authority to contract on behalf of the company. In effect, she was an undisclosed agent of Alcheck’s economic interests expressing concern over potential code changes that affected the value of the property. The email indicated that there was real concern within the investment group that the planned conversions were threatened by staff’s proposed amendments presented to the commission. It was also another reason for Alcheck to disclose his interest and recuse himself from participation on the three items. (See investigation Pages 64-66) 1 Staff’s proposed change to the definition of garage, if enacted, would also have removed the classification of his parking structure as a garage. If his packing structure were no longer defined as a carport or a garage, the predominant patter on the block would revert to “rear,” as it was prior to construction. At the dais, Michael Alcheck, improperly, did not reveal his sibling and economic relationship with his sister, the author of the email. And when another Commissioner at the November 29, 2017 meeting referenced the email and concurred with its conclusions at the hearing (Investigation Page 68), that Commissioner, in best light, was unwittingly used by Alcheck. Not addressed by the City Attorney’s office, the investigation report also details the reasons for Michael Alcheck’s conflict of interest in relation to the Contextual Garage Place code at a series of meetings at the Commission in 2015. (Chapter 2 beginning on Page 23). It is possible that Alcheck’s dispute with planning staff in early 2015 over the practice and intent of the Contextual Garage Placement code prior to their, incorrectly, granting permits via a carport-in-the-front loophole did not filter up to the City Attorney’s office, but the conflict of interest was still present. But in 2017 the city attorney’s office certainly did know about the situation. In July, Alcheck and his investment partners added garages doors at each site without filing applications, submitting plans, or receiving permits. Neighbors complained to the city and later the city attorney, together with the city manager and planning director conferred on next steps as discussed in an internal October 2 email from Hillary Gitelman (Investigation, Appendix D). The last two sentences of the director’s email read as follows: “After consultation with the City Manager and City Attorney, staff will not be approving permits for the conversions from carports to garages at this time as this would circumvent our code requirements on neighborhood contexts. Unless the code is changed, however, the conversion can be approved after a reasonable period of time.” The closing sentence is stating that the Contextual Garage Placement code could be changed in a way to prevent the conversions, and therefore, by extension, that Alcheck had a conflict of interest at the prior Commission hearings in 2015 and would also again at the upcoming ones later in 2017. Unfortunately, those upcoming meetings with their relevance to Alcheck properties were not revealed to the public. Fred Balin 2385 Columbia Street Palo Alto, CA 94306 1 Brettle, Jessica From:Jennifer Landesmann <jlandesmann@gmail.com> Sent:Saturday, October 19, 2019 7:08 PM To:Council, City Subject:Airplane Noise - City’s federal advocates' 2019 study session Attachments:Demand Letter to FAA re Tower Order BUR 10-18-19.pdf; Letter to FAA re Scoping for BUR Environmental Assessment 10-18-19.pdf CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.  Hello Council,     I look forward to hearing what initiatives PACC will take as a result of the 9/16 study session with Steve Palmer, Van  Scoyoc Associates. Mr. Palmer's follow up was also helpful. I am including here a table with the most relevant noise  provisions in the 2018 FAA reauthorization by consultant Mary Ellen Eagan, HMMH in case this is of interest.     In addition to appreciation for Mr. Palmer's support, and Rep Eshoo's leadership, I want to emphasize gratitude for the  grassroots groups from around the country who collaborated to get our voices in the 2018 reauthorization and FY2020  appropriations. These warriors include community leaders from NY, Chicago, Boston, and D.C. in Reps Norton, Lynch,  Suozzi, Quigley and Meng districts who Chair/Co Chair the Quiet Skies Caucus. Last week they met with FAA's new  Administrator Stephen Dickson as noted in this QS Caucus press release.    Going forward, Council member Tanaka's questions during your study session raise a legitimate point ‐ what can the City  do to put more power into PACC’s lobbying efforts regarding airplane noise and emissions?     If you are serious, I suggest that adding professionals who are not from an aviation background could be more helpful at  this juncture. Mr. Palmer and Mr. Kirsch backgrounds are mostly aviation and better would be to have advice from  someone with strong environmental advocacy background or executive business background.     However you proceed, I offer two areas which are tough nuts to crack ‐ in case you, Mr. Palmer, or others may want to  help with.     1) The Ombudsman Provision (below):   FAA has so far been assigning Community Engagement Officers who report to the Air Traffic Organization for each region  but that is not what the law was meant for. A high level real Ombudsman at each region is still needed.   FAA 2018 Reauthorization (a) In General.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, with respect to each region of the Federal Aviation Administration, the Regional Administrator for that region shall designate an individual to be the Regional Ombudsman for the region. (b) Requirements.--Each Regional Ombudsman shall-- (1) serve as a regional liaison with the public, including community groups, on issues regarding aircraft noise, pollution, and safety; (2) make recommendations to the Administrator for the region to address concerns raised by the public and improve the consideration of public comments in decision-making processes; and (3) be consulted on proposed changes in aircraft operations affecting the region, including arrival and departure routes, in order to minimize environmental impacts, including noise.   2 2) Advisory Committees:   As Mr. Palmer mentioned, Nextgen gets done like a business with various advisory committees. These committees  are stacked against the public who have to sustain the various ambitious industry business plans ‐ which have a direct  impact on our communities and especially Palo Alto. The Nextgen Advisory Committee would benefit from having the  Ombudsmen participating (the Ombudsman we don't have yet!). As a recent Inspector General report about Nextgen  has reported, Nextgen needs to have better methods to measure benefits, among other things.     Separately, I ask that you please clarify the information about the 2012 legislation for Catex provided by Mr. Palmer. The  way it sounded was that this law means that it's "game over" in terms of Nextgen procedures or because the NorCal  2014 Metroplex is completed communities have no rights. Los Angeles has a very different view of this as illustrated by  the attached two letters about Burbank Airport showing they legally achieved getting reconsideration of three Catex  procedures (after Metroplex) and are asserting on having adequate review of procedures which have not previously  been studied in Metroplex. Centennial Airport goes further;  they didn't even wait to get a record of decision for an EA  to challenge FAA about flawed environmental processes and called FAA on the 2018 laws that need to be considered.    These cities who are fighting for truthful environmental processes have brought a lot of light  ‐ from the smallest cities to  the largest, there is much that is within your power to do.     Thanks,    Jennifer                     Raquel Girvin October 18, 2019 Page 2 Background FAA promulgated the 2017 Departure Procedures after completion of an Environmental Assessment and issuance of a Finding of No Significant Impact and Record of Decision ("ROD") for the Metroplex project. The Environmental Assessment analyzed the environmental impacts of numerous Metroplex procedures. As to the SLAPP ONE and OROSZ TWO procedures in the 2017 Departure Procedures, the FAA analysis was based upon a conclusion that aircraft departing Runway 15 at Burbank Airport would follow the existing departure flight paths until joining the new RNAV procedures after a northbound turn. Notwithstanding that conclusion in the Environmental Assessment, when the new RNAV procedures were implemented, the public almost immediately noticed a change in Burbank Airport flight paths. The FAA for months denied that any changes had occurred. FAA recently informed the public of its acknowledgement of what the public has long known: that aircraft departing Burbank Airport are not adhering to the pre-Metroplex flight tracks evaluated by FAA when it issued the Departure Procedures. Specifically, in a July 2019 presentation, "Hollywood Burbank Airport Departures (Past, Current and Proposed Procedures)," FAA stated that "it appears the Runway 15 departure tracks from 2018 have shifted slightly south compared to the tracks from 2016." In FAA's Informational Briefing Executive Summary on July 30, 2019, it further elaborated that flight data "shows a southern shift for the southernmost BUR [Burbank Airport] departure flight tracks that coincide with the time Metroplex procedures were implemented." Therefore, FAA air traffic controllers are directing aircraft away from the pre-Metroplex flight tracks that FAA previously determined would remain unchanged after implementation of the RNAV procedures. FAA's concession that departure flight tracks are deviating from pre-Metroplex flight tracks is precisely what elected officials and residents from affected communities have been telling FAA for many months - that real-world experience shows that aircraft departing Burbank Airport are deviating from the flight tracks that were existing when FAA implemented the 2017 Departure Procedures. The southern shift of flight tracks following FAA's implementation of the 2017 Departure Procedures was not an action that was analyzed when FAA issued the Departure Procedures. Consequently, the environmental impacts of the southern shift in flight tracks were not evaluated by FAA as part of its environmental review of the 2017 Departure Procedures, as required under the National Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. § 4321, the National Historic Preservation Act, 54 U.S.C. § 300101, Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C. § 303(c) and FAA Order 1050.lF. Therefore, the change has occurred without legally necessary environmental clearances or public review. The Request for Formal Action We are not seeking another lengthy environmental review, nor is such a review required here. We are simply seeking compliance with FAA conclusions in its 2017 ROD. Formal rulemaking is not required to eliminate the southern shift of departing flights and to return to the flight tracks established before the Metroplex project and that were included in the Environmental Assessment and incorporated in the ROD. The City's requested actions are a feasible and direct measure to ensure FAA complies with the flight tracks that were presented to the public and analyzed and relied on by FAA in issuing the ROD. Since the southerly shift was implemented informally without formal rulemaking, the elimination of this Raquel Girvin October 18, 2019 Page 3 erroneous change can similarly be implemented administratively through a Tower Order, Standard Operating Procedure, or similar internal agency directive. If FAA believes that a petition for rulemaking pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 11.61 is required to ensure immediate compliance with the ROD, the City requests that FAA notify us immediately and explain the basis for the agency's position. The City recognizes that FAA is considering modifications to the 2017 Departure Procedures and has promised to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of, and alternatives to, potential changes to those procedures. FAA has not published any proposed implementation date for any changes, but it will be years away since the agency has just initiated the environmental documentation for any such changes in the last few weeks. Certainly, FAA may decide to consider adopting a southern shift as a possible action, among a number of alternatives the FAA might consider to the 2017 Departure Procedures. But that consideration must include proper evaluation of the potential environmental impacts of a southern shift and any other alternative departure procedure. Similarly, the task force in which FAA is participating may consider changes in flight paths but such changes will require new environmental review, a process that is not required for restoration of flight tracks upon which the FAA relied in its earlier environmental review of the 2017 Departure Procedures. Today, we have separately submitted comments on the appropriate scope of the environmental review for potential changes to the 2017 Departure Procedures but this letter is independent of, and unrelated to, those comments. In the interim, FAA must comply with the pre-Metroplex flight tracks analyzed in connection with the 2017 Departure Procedures. The City requests that FAA secure compliance through the issuance of a Tower Order, Standard Operating Procedure, or other administrative action that instructs air traffic controllers that they are required to direct pilots to follow the flight tracks that were established prior to the Metroplex project and that were modeled in the Environmental Assessment for the 2017 Departure Procedures. Immediate action is necessary to address non-compliance with the pre-Metroplex flight tracks and, therefore, the City requests that FAA take formal action within 30 days of this letter. Sincerely, ~ 1!/~~ Los Angeles City Attorney Federal Aviation Administration Operations Support Group October 18, 2019 Page 2 necessary step towards adequately evaluating potential significant impacts of and alternatives to the Proposed Procedures. FAA's next step must be to conduct a thorough scoping process that defines the scope of the environmental assessment and identifies all environmental issues requiring analyses in the assessment. Pursuant to NEPA, an environmental assessment "must present a detailed analysis, to the satisfaction of the responsible FAA official, commensurate with the level of impact of the proposed action and alternatives, to determine whether any impacts will be significant." Order 1050.lF 11 6-2.2(e). To ensure an adequate environmental assessment is conducted, FAA must address "the scope of issues" and identify the "significant issues related to a proposed action" that should be addressed in the environmental assessment. 40 C.F.R. § 1501.7. The City requests that FAA require its independent consultant to conduct a scoping process that adequately reflects the level of potential environmental impacts of the Proposed Procedures and the public controversy surrounding the Procedures. As part of the scoping process, FAA should incorporate the following recommendations for the environmental assessment of the Proposed Procedures. Public Participation in the Scoping Process. NEPA requires that FAA facilitate meaningful public involvement as part of the scoping process. See 40 C.F.R. § 1501.7. Although not expressly required for environmental assessments, FAA's rules state that "scoping can be particularly useful when an [environmental assessment] deals with uncertainty or controversy regarding potential conflicts over the use of resources or the environmental impacts of the proposed actions." Order 1050.lF 11 6-2.2(c). Here, FAA has already acknowledged the public controversy over the Proposed Procedures by elevating its environmental review from a potential documented categorical exclusion to an environmental assessment. The public concerns over the environmental impacts of the Proposed Procedures demand that FAA facilitate a transparent and inclusive scoping process. A scoping process for the Proposed Procedures should, according to FAA's rules, "provide a transparent way to identify environmental issues, focusing the analysis on the most pertinent issues and impacts." Id. Consistent with FAA policy, the City requests that FAA establish a formal process for scoping and public involvement. Establishing a formal scoping process could be achieved in coordination with the recently- established Southern San Fernando Valley Airplane Noise Task Force. As indicated in FAA's announcement regarding a contract for preparation of the environmental assessment, the Task Force will play an important role in the environmental assessment process, including providing FAA with recommended alternatives to the Proposed Procedures. Through a formal scoping process, FAA can receive productive input on the Proposed Procedures from the Task Force at an early stage in the environmental assessment process. Adequate Noise Modeling and Assessment. FAA must ensure through the scoping process that the environmental assessment subjects potential noise impacts of the Proposed Procedures to both extensive modeling and on-the-ground assessments of potentially affected properties and communities. The existing OROSZ TWO and SLAPP ONE RNAV procedures disperse flight tracks consistent with conventional departure procedures. However, under the Proposed Procedures, flight tracks would become more concentrated and would therefore focus noise over Studio City and Sherman Oaks with Federal Aviation Administration Operations Support Group October 18, 2019 Page 3 residential, historic, park, natural areas, and other land uses susceptible to increased noise levels from overflights. As the City detailed in its November 16, 2018 comments to FAA, because the Proposed Procedures would move flights over the Santa Monica Mountains, homes, parks, and other properties located at the higher altitudes would be closer to overflights departing BUR. The scoping process should define the exact modeling and modeling parameters to be used in the environmental assessment so that adequate consideration is given to the different altitudes of land under the Proposed Procedures. Modeling must account for varying terrain -including the mountainous terrain south and west of the JA YTE waypoint. FAA's Draft Environmental Review that included Aviation Environmental Design Tool (AEDT) modeling was based on the airport field elevations and failed to consider the higher altitudes of mountains areas in Studio City and Sherman Oaks. Consideration of the interplay between altitudes and aircraft noise is necessary to review potential impacts to properties under NEPA, as well as other applicable environmental requirements, including the National Historic Preservation Act, 54 U.S.C. § 300101 and Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C. § 303(c). In addition to modeling the predicted flight tracks of the Proposed Procedures, scoping must identify anticipated deviations from the predicted flight tracks and include them in the modeling. As FAA is well- aware, limiting environmental analysis of RNAV procedures to only the precise charted RNAV route - without considering inevitable deviations and vectoring from those routes -results in an environmental review that fails to capture all foreseeable impacts of flight procedures. As FAA is also aware, aircraft are frequently vectored by ATCT controllers, and when such vectoring is prevalent, noise impacts can vary materially both in magnitude and location from hypothetical scenarios that assume strict compliance with RNAV procedures. The scoping process should explicitly seek input on the scenarios that should be modeled and evaluated -not just the existing conditions, Proposed Procedures, and alternatives thereto, but also scenarios based upon realistic projections about degrees of compliance with the Proposed Procedures. Scenarios to be evaluated should be based upon realistic evaluation of the likelihood of, and location of, any vectoring instructions. In addition to modeling, FAA's scoping process must establish the appropriate criteria for assessing "noise sensitive" properties under the Proposed Procedures. FAA's AEDT modeling -and FAA's noise thresholds for determining noise impacts -are often not sufficiently protective of properties where "a quiet setting is a generally recognized purpose and attribute." See Order 1050.lF, app. B ~ B-1.5. FAA must give "special consideration" when evaluating the significance of noise impacts on noise sensitive areas such as historic sites, public parks, and natural areas. See id. Assessment of noise sensitive areas may need to include consideration of actual or predicted noise levels, and not modeling. Public participation during the scoping process can identify and provide information on those noise sensitive properties. In light of the considerable public interest (and controversy) concerning both the existing RNAV procedures and the Proposed Procedures, FAA must analyze noise impacts outside the traditional threshold of 65 decibels DNL and using metrics other than DNL. FAA is on notice that the communities in the vicinity of BUR who would be affected by the Proposed Procedures are traditionally noise sensitive areas and historically quiet settings. People in these communities have reacted with particular vigor to Federal Aviation Administration Operations Support Group October 18, 2019 Page 4 the adverse impacts of noise events and noise levels below the agency's traditional threshold. It would be both arbitrary and capricious for the agency to rely upon its normal regulatory presumption that noise impacts below a threshold of 65 dB DNL are not significant. The extent of public controversy, the prevalence of litigation, the call for, and eventual establishment of the informal task force, and the level of FAA staff effort that has focused on the noise impacts of flight tracks in this region together provide ample evidence for a conclusion that these communities consider noise impacts in areas exposed to noise below 65 dB DNL to be a significant environmental impact. To ignore such evidence would be inappropriate. The scoping process should propose a sui generis noise threshold and metric which recognizes these realities, notwithstanding thresholds and presumptions set forth in Order 1050.lF. The scoping process should explicitly examine (1) alternative and supplemental metrics that more precisely assess the impacts from numerous overflights with comparatively modest individual or cumulative noise levels; (2) noise impacts in communities that have already demonstrated the existence of high annoyance to a significant degree exist in areas with noise far less than 65 dB DNL. Alternatives. Through the scoping process, FAA must determine a full range of reasonable alternatives based on the potential of each alternative to minimize noise impacts, in addition to meeting safety, efficiency, and other objectives. An environmental assessment must include consideration of a!ternat:ve flight tracks along U.S. Highway 101 that have been proposed. Through scoping, the FAA can identify alternatives like the U.S. Highway 101 flight tracks that place overflights over areas with compatible land uses. Scoping alternatives to the Proposed Procedures will also ensure to the maximum extent possible that flights tracks avoid elevated and sensitive land areas between the JAYTE and TEAGN waypoints. Providing for public involvement in the scoping process is critical to establishing a range of alternatives in the environmental assessment that both reflects the scale of public concern over potential environmental impacts and adequately considers minimization of noise impacts. The City requests that FAA establish a formal and open scoping process for the Proposed Procedures environmental assessment. Given the public's interest and concerns over the potential impact of the Proposed Procedures, a scoping process that incorporates the City's recommendations is a necessary first step towards preparing an adequate environmental assessment. The City is willing to provide assistance and additional recommendations to FAA in the scoping process. Sincerely, c Q:!/ti~ Los Angeles City Attorney 1 Brettle, Jessica From:Linda M. Saunders <linda.saunders@stanford.edu> Sent:Thursday, October 17, 2019 12:15 PM To:editor@paweekly.com; news@padailypost.com; editor@almanacnews.com; news@stanforddaily.com; usafetypcore@stanford.edu; Eileen O'Rourke; stanfordstaffers@lists.stanford.edu; Jo-Ann Cuevas; cardinaleatwork@stanford.edu; hrcommunications@stanford.edu; OConnell, M; Police; Clerk, City; City Mgr; Council, City; Dueker, Kenneth; Perron, Zachary; Williams, Simon; policechief@menlopark.org; police@losaltosca.gov; board@ctra.org; stanfordwestapartments@stanford.edu; lucy.wicks@stanford.edu; Russell Furr; Robert L. Carpenter; Cynthea A. Kingsley; Norman W Robinson; doc_coordinators@lists.stanford.edu; bbond@stanfordhealthcare.org; lharwood@stanfordhealthcare.org; Harris, Kathryn; Rami Abdelhadi; christine@icrichild.org; debbie@icrichild.org; enrollment@icrichild.org; allison@icrichild.org; MLy@kindercare.com; KYates@kindercare.com; susan@ccscparentcoop.org; hope@ccscparentcoop.org; sally@icrichild.org; mickey.alvarado@brighthorizons.com; Nathalie.larsen@brighthorizons.com; pinecone@brighthorizons.com; bingschool; Becky Brewer Subject:FW: 2019 Annual AlertSU Test Notification CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.  Please distribute widely.   Thank you.    Stanford Dept. of Public Safety.     From: Public Safety [mailto:publicsafety@lists.stanford.edu]   Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2019 8:22 AM  To: Linda M. Saunders <linda.saunders@stanford.edu>  Subject: 2019 Annual AlertSU Test Notification  Dear Stanford Faculty, Staff & Affiliates, On Tuesday, October 22, 2019, at approximately 12:10 PM, Stanford University will conduct its annual test of the campus AlertSU system. Alert messages will be sent via text message and email to the Stanford community. The test will also include activation of the outdoor warning system, which will sound an audible tone for approximately 30 seconds, followed by a verbal message from each of the 7 sirens at various campus locations. The sirens will be audible throughout the campus and may also be heard in parts of the surrounding communities, including Palo Alto, Menlo Park and Los Altos. Also being tested is Cisco VoIP speaker phones. VoIP speaker phones are found in many of the academic and office buildings throughout campus. If you have a Cisco phone in your area, the alertsu message will broadcast from the speaker phone and a banner message will appear in the display. In the test message, you will be asked to click a link to acknowledge or confirm that you have received the message. This is an important step which will help us monitor the success of this test. If you receive both a text and email, you only need to acknowledge one of the messages you receive. 2 If your department would like to participate in an evacuation drill to your emergency assembly point (EAP) during this scheduled test, please contact AlertSU at alertsudps@stanford.edu. Prior to the test, it is important you verify that your contact information is correct in StanfordYou. Make sure there is an entry in the mobile phone field, as this is the most rapid and direct way of communication with you during an emergency. Additionally, in order to know you are receiving an official AlertSU message, please program the following information into your mobile phone contacts.  Email Address: alertsudps@lists.stanford.edu  Phone Number: 650-725-5555  Text Message phone number: 89361 If there were a real emergency, you would be asked to follow the specific instructions in the alert message. Other avenues that might be used to inform the community about critical incidents include:  Stanford’s emergency website: http://emergency.stanford.edu  Department of Public Safety website: https://police.stanford.edu  KZSU 90.1 FM  University emergency information hotlines: 650-725-5555 and 844-253-7878 (844-AlertSU) Upon receipt of an AlertSU message, notify others in your immediate vicinity to ensure they are also aware of the situation and the recommended safety precautions. For more information about the AlertSU system, please visit the AlertSU FAQ page at: https://police.stanford.edu/alertsu-faq.html. Evacuation procedures and how to respond to other emergencies can be found on the following resource pages.  Evacuation Procedure: https://ehs.stanford.edu/manual/emergency-response-guidelines/evacuation- procedure  Fire: https://ehs.stanford.edu/manual/emergency-response-guidelines/fire  Earthquake: https://ehs.stanford.edu/manual/emergency-response-guidelines/earthquake  Stanford University Emergency Response Guidelines: https://ehs.stanford.edu/manual/emergency- response-guidelines  Safety, Security, and Fire Report 2019: https://police.stanford.edu/security-report.html Thank you for your cooperation. Stanford Department of Public Safety To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet. 1 Brettle, Jessica From:Mark Cox <markdarrellcox@icloud.com> Sent:Sunday, October 20, 2019 10:40 PM To:jd@howardstern.com Subject:Bob Freedman CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on  links.  ________________________________    Jon Leary reintroduced himself to Me as Ron Tomczak in 1996 in Nebraska after leaving my Life as Jon Leary in 1977.  Given that Jon's Birthdate was supposedly the 8th of January in 1939 then in 1996 his Age would be 57 Years of Age.  Thereafter Interactions continued intermittently with Ron Tomczak until 2012. This covers a Period that rounds off to  Sixteen Years as Ron Tomczak aka Jon Charles Leary of Peoria, Illinois.    Jon Leary's First Name is likely not the Real Name given that his Alias of Ron Tomczak is "Priest" "Divider From Zak"  meaning that Little Boy Me who would bang on pots and pans instinctively so was cut off from my brother Zak Starkey  who is the Drummer from the Who and this Divide to Conquer was administered by the Priestly Abduction Service of  Blankspace Jon Ron Leary whose Name of "Jon Leary" mimics my Fathers Name of "John Lennon." The Guys Identity  Revolves Around Me and My Father. Apparently.    Over the Course of these Sixtine Years of Interactions with Jon Ron Leary Tomczak with his Age ranging from potentially  ~57 Years of Age to ~73 of Age though Jon was advanced in Years it was as if Jon Ron wasn't Aging. Thus the Genetic  Potential of the Leary Tree is on the Exceptionally Vital Side of the Fence and this was True for Jon Ron despite his Sins of Indulging in (A) Confederated Stealth Assistance within the Leary Clan to Expand the Market of Opium, (B) Covert  Tunneling into the Machinations of US Elections through Precinct Indoctrinates as they learn to Master the Manipulation  of the System inclusive of Ballot Petitions Drives for Issues and Candidates, and (C) Abduction and Indoctrination of  Selected Harvested Children who are Screened, Vetted, Groomed, Tested, Graduated into Cults and Subcults crossing  the Racial Thresholds to Allow Penetration into All Markets though of course the Leary Racial Bias still exists and Other  Races are therefore regarded as Disposable by this Family Cult. Then the Fourth Category to Note is (D) How Deeply  does Jon Ron the False Priest Mafia Father wade into Scripture? Enough to Deceive yet the Amount of Scriptural Activity  would nevertheless be less than that of a Full Time Rabbi or Priest. Hence A, B, C > D in Depth of Magnitude of Sins.  Despite Jon Ron's Deceptions and Abductions Jon Ron nevertheless exhibited a level of Physical Vitality that was  Exceptional.    So then, if Bob Freedman is Noel Leary the Son of Blank Jon Leary aka Ron Tomczak then how can we explain the  difference of Noel Leary seeming to Age Faster than Ron. Not that Noel if Bob is Aging more rapidly than the General  Population but certainly relative to the Genetic Parents of Noel Leary of Both Jon and Hannah Leary aka Ron and Jane  Tomczak there seems to be a Greater Advancement of Years in the Person of Noel Leary if Bob Freedman than exhibited  by Jon Leary aka Ron Tomczak from 57 Years of Age to 73 Years of Age. With a Supposed Birthdate of August 9th 1966  then Noel Leary if Bob Freedman is 53 Years of Age which is definitely less than Jon Ron Leary Tomczak in 1996 and Noel  if Bob's Appearance is Older than Jon Ron in 1996. So how do we explain this marked difference between Father and  Mother and their Second Son?    Either (E) Noel lives under a False Identity because Noel wanted to leave his Cultic Mafia Family or else (F) Noel is living  under a False Identity because that is what this Cultic Mafia Family in Standard Cultic Mafia Operations to Conduct  Diverse Operations of Deceit. If Noel is Operating under Category "E" then his Weight of Sins is Minimal Relative to His  Genetic Father in Categories "A", "B", "C". If Noel is Operating in Category "F" then Noel is Continuing in the Sins of His  Genetic Father in Categories "A", "B", "C", and Also adding to this Weight of Darkly Waged Sins by Virtue of Lying to  2 Hebrew Populations while Infiltrating their Ranks as a Subversive Agent and this would explain Noel if Bob's Greater  Apparent Advancement in Years. This Instance of Operating Under Category "F" is Easy to Understand. Yet what if Noel if  Bob is Operating under Category F? How would we explain the Greater Apparent Aging of Noel Leary if Bob Freedman  relative to his Genetic Father Blank Jon Leary aka Ron Tomczak? If Noel's Sins under Categories "A", "B", "C" are Minimal  and Only Vestiges from before Noel left his Cultic Leary Mafia Family then what would explain Noels Greater Aging  Relative to his Genetic Father? The Category to Zoom in to Note the Dichotomy of Aging within the Same Gene Pool is  Category "D" which for Noel is Immersion at the Very Least into the Masoretic Text inclusive of Hebrew as a Cantor and  a Rabbi. Hence we could potentially conclude that the Distortions of Defective Spelling introduced with the Tiberian  Vowel System and with the Alterations in Scripture Passages from the Original Scripture inclusive of the Revision that  Depicts Elohim finishing Work on the Seventh Day are Distortions that are even more Corrosive than the Darkly Evil  Behavior of Jon Leary in Categories "A", "B", "C" and though Noel if Bob is living under an Assumed Identity this behavior  can be discounted as reasonable behavior given what happened to Max Travis Leary who apparently joined the Family  Cult and then attempted to leave the Family Cult by going to the FBI yet Corrupt Infiltrate FBI Agents informed the Leary  Family Cult and Max Travis Leary was given a False Conviction to Damage his Identity and to thereafter Contain Max  Travis Leary in a Virtual Prison as a Greek Priest to Dutifully Launder Money under the Threat of Returning to Prison with  a Conviction of Child Molestation of a Three Year Old Victim yet this Record functions as a Pointer to his Sister Tricia who  died in 1980 as does his Sex Offender Registration Address of Patricia Lane in Peoria.    Consider further that Max Travis Leary as a Child was an Exceptionally Beautiful Child yet by the Age of his Sex Offender  Registration Photographs which span over a period of detectable aging infer that Max Travis Leary assumed participation  in the Leary Family Criminal Cult was having dire consequences on the Health of Max Travis Leary. The Beauty of the  Child was lost to the Criminal Nature of What is a Deeply Evil Cult. Yet with the Exposure of Greek Septuagint albeit  limited as the Greek Church is Adrift there seems to be an affect in the Life of Max Travis Leary that has lessened the  Dark Imposition that was Imported into His Life by His Behavior even though as a Priest in a Virtual Family Prison Max  Travis Leary is Subservient to the Family Cult and as a Greek Priest Max Travis Leary likely lacks the Strict Fidelity of a  Kosher Diet Free of Blood, Free of Swine, Free of Biting the Hand that Feeds the Flesh of a Child by the Breast which is  the Mark of a Beast to Bite into a Mothers Breast by Eating the Child that is an Extension of the Mother while Drinking  and/or Eating the Mother's Milk. Hence if Max Travis Leary were to become Compliant by his Mouth to the Torah and to  become True to the Greek Septuagint the Son of Man by the Sixtine Text by the Printing of 1587 by Recitation by the  Mouth in Ruminate Memorization Cycling through the First Six Books of the Torah Each Month while Covering the Larger  Canon of the Prophets Et Al in a Yearly Cycle then the Expectation is that the Health of Max Travis Leary would return to  a Greater Degree while also Freeing Max from False Family Virtual Imprisonment and Restoring his Identity to Max  Travis Leary in the Reversal of a False Retaliatory Conviction. Likewise this Same Prescription could lead to Age Reversal  for Noel if Bob Leary if Freedman assuming that Noel if Bob is Operating Under Category "E." The Point Here is that God  can be Proven and that Truth is Always Subject to Proof even as the Face of Moses was Made Whole in the Cleft of the  Rock as the Cleft Palate was taken away by the Orthodox Behavior of God while the Golden Calf was unable to Defend  itself from Destruction. In the Name of Full Disclosure, Scriptural Recitation is a Time Intensive Activity akin to Tilling a  Farm with the Tongue as the Plow that Requires Long Term Dedicated Practice.                1 Brettle, Jessica From:Mark Cox <markdarrellcox@icloud.com> Sent:Monday, October 21, 2019 5:10 PM To:jd@howardstern.com Subject:Bob Freedman CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on  links.  ________________________________    So here is the Candidate for Noel Leary "Bob Freedom." Bob, can you tell Me about yourself? Are you an Active Member  of the Leary Cult or are you hiding from your Leary Mafia Family under Bob "Paste Over" Freedman while the Leary  Mafia Cult Markets and Distributes Heroin to Functional United States Junkies while also grooming the Upcoming  Generation to Believe in Opium as they continue to Abduct and Indoctrinate Small Children to serve as Indentured  Manipulated Minions? What Say Ye Bobbing? Of course this is assuming Bobbing is Noel Null Leary with My Birthday?  Drop off a Hair Sample and Allow Every DNA Testors to Test a Portion of Your Head. We know Kelly Laurene is so  terrified People will learn who Kelly that Laurene stuffs Companies up her Ass like it's the Gate to the Underworld. DNA  Companies : See Her Rectum Portal.  3     [:;]    Jon Leary reintroduced himself to Me as Ron Tomczak in 1996 in Nebraska after leaving my Life as Jon Leary in 1977.  Given that Jon's Birthdate was supposedly the 8th of January in 1939 then in 1996 his Age would be 57 Years of Age.  Thereafter Interactions continued intermittently with Ron Tomczak until 2012. This covers a Period that rounds off to  Sixteen Years as Ron Tomczak aka Jon Charles Leary of Peoria, Illinois.     Jon Leary's First Name is likely not the Real Name given that his Alias of Ron Tomczak is "Priest" "Divider From Zak"  meaning that Little Boy Me who would bang on pots and pans instinctively so was cut off from my brother Zak Starkey  who is the Drummer from the Who and this Divide to Conquer was administered by the Priestly Abduction Service of  Blankspace Jon Ron Leary whose Name of "Jon Leary" mimics my Fathers Name of "John Lennon." The Guys Identity  Revolves Around Me and My Father. Apparently.     Over the Course of these Sixtine Years of Interactions with Jon Ron Leary Tomczak with his Age ranging from potentially  ~57 Years of Age to ~73 of Age though Jon was advanced in Years it was as if Jon Ron wasn't Aging. Thus the Genetic  Potential of the Leary Tree is on the Exceptionally Vital Side of the Fence and this was True for Jon Ron despite his Sins of  Indulging in (A) Confederated Stealth Assistance within the Leary Clan to Expand the Market of Opium, (B) Covert  Tunneling into the Machinations of US Elections through Precinct Indoctrinates as they learn to Master the Manipulation  of the System inclusive of Ballot Petitions Drives for Issues and Candidates, and (C) Abduction and Indoctrination of  Selected Harvested Children who are Screened, Vetted, Groomed, Tested, Graduated into Cults and Subcults crossing  the Racial Thresholds to Allow Penetration into All Markets though of course the Leary Racial Bias still exists and Other  Races are therefore regarded as Disposable by this Family Cult. Then the Fourth Category to Note is (D) How Deeply  does Jon Ron the False Priest Mafia Father wade into Scripture? Enough to Deceive yet the Amount of Scriptural Activity  would nevertheless be less than that of a Full Time Rabbi or Priest. Hence A, B, C > D in Depth of Magnitude of Sins.  Despite Jon Ron's Deceptions and Abductions Jon Ron nevertheless exhibited a level of Physical Vitality that was  Exceptional.     So then, if Bob Freedman is Noel Leary the Son of Blank Jon Leary aka Ron Tomczak then how can we explain the  difference of Noel Leary seeming to Age Faster than Ron. Not that Noel if Bob is Aging more rapidly than the General  Population but certainly relative to the Genetic Parents of Noel Leary of Both Jon and Hannah Leary aka Ron and Jane  Tomczak there seems to be a Greater Advancement of Years in the Person of Noel Leary if Bob Freedman than exhibited  by Jon Leary aka Ron Tomczak from 57 Years of Age to 73 Years of Age. With a Supposed Birthdate of August 9th 1966  then Noel Leary if Bob Freedman is 53 Years of Age which is definitely less than Jon Ron Leary Tomczak in 1996 and Noel  if Bob's Appearance is Older than Jon Ron in 1996. So how do we explain this marked difference between Father and  Mother and their Second Son?     Either (E) Noel lives under a False Identity because Noel wanted to leave his Cultic Mafia Family or else (F) Noel is living  under a False Identity because that is what this Cultic Mafia Family in Standard Cultic Mafia Operations to Conduct  Diverse Operations of Deceit. If Noel is Operating under Category "E" then his Weight of Sins is Minimal Relative to His  Genetic Father in Categories "A", "B", "C". If Noel is Operating in Category "F" then Noel is Continuing in the Sins of His  Genetic Father in Categories "A", "B", "C", and Also adding to this Weight of Darkly Waged Sins by Virtue of Lying to  Hebrew Populations while Infiltrating their Ranks as a Subversive Agent and this would explain Noel if Bob's Greater  Apparent Advancement in Years. This Instance of Operating Under Category "F" is Easy to Understand. Yet what if Noel if  Bob is Operating under Category F? How would we explain the Greater Apparent Aging of Noel Leary if Bob Freedman  relative to his Genetic Father Blank Jon Leary aka Ron Tomczak? If Noel's Sins under Categories "A", "B", "C" are Minimal  and Only Vestiges from before Noel left his Cultic   Leary Mafia Family then what would explain Noels Greater Aging Relative to his Genetic Father? The Category to Zoom  in to Note the Dichotomy of Aging within the Same Gene Pool is Category "D" which for Noel is Immersion at the Very  Least into the Masoretic Text inclusive of Hebrew as a Cantor and a Rabbi. Hence we could potentially conclude that the  Distortions of Defective Spelling introduced with the Tiberian Vowel System and with the Alterations in Scripture  4 Passages from the Original Scripture inclusive of the Revision that Depicts Elohim finishing Work on the Seventh Day are  Distortions that are even more Corrosive than the Darkly Evil Behavior of Jon Leary in Categories "A", "B", "C" and  though Noel if Bob is living under an Assumed Identity this behavior can be discounted as reasonable behavior given  what happened to Max Travis Leary who apparently joined the Family Cult and then attempted to leave the Family Cult  by going to the FBI yet Corrupt Infiltrate FBI Agents informed the Leary Family Cult and Max Travis Leary was given a  False Conviction to Damage his Identity and to thereafter Contain Max Travis Leary in a Virtual Prison as a Greek Priest  to Dutifully Launder Money under the Threat of Returning to Prison with a Conviction of Child Molestation of a Three  Year Old Victim yet this Record functions as a Pointer to his Sister Tricia who died in 1980 as does his Sex Offender  Registration Address of Patricia Lane in Peoria.     Consider further that Max Travis Leary as a Child was an Exceptionally Beautiful Child yet by the Age of his Sex Offender  Registration Photographs which span over a period of detectable aging infer that Max Travis Leary assumed participation  in the Leary Family Criminal Cult was having dire consequences on the Health of Max Travis Leary. The Beauty of the  Child was lost to the Criminal Nature of What is a Deeply Evil Cult. Yet with the Exposure of Greek Septuagint albeit  limited as the Greek Church is Adrift there seems to be an affect in the Life of Max Travis Leary that has lessened the  Dark Imposition that was Imported into His Life by His Behavior even though as a Priest in a Virtual Family Prison Max  Travis Leary is Subservient to the Family Cult and as a Greek Priest Max Travis Leary likely lacks the Strict Fidelity of a  Kosher Diet Free of Blood, Free of Swine, Free of Biting the Hand that Feeds the Flesh of a Child by the Breast which is  the Mark of a Beast to Bite into a Mothers Breast by Eating the Child that is an Extension of the Mother while Drinking  and/or Eating the Mother's Milk. Hence if Max Travis Leary were to become Compliant by his Mouth to the Torah and to  become True to the Greek Septuagint the Son of Man by the Sixtine Text by the Printing of 1587 by Recitation by the  Mouth in Ruminate Memorization Cycling through the First Six Books of the Torah Each Month while Covering the Larger  Canon of the Prophets Et Al in a Yearly Cycle then the Expectation is that the Health of Max Travis Leary would return to  a Greater Degree while also Freeing Max from False Family Virtual Imprisonment and Restoring his Identity to Max  Travis Leary in the Reversal of a False Retaliatory Conviction. Likewise this Same Prescription could lead to Age Reversal  for Noel if Bob Leary if Freedman assuming that Noel if Bob is Operating Under Category "E." The Point Here is that God  can be Proven and that Truth is Always Subject to Proof even as the Face of Moses was Made Whole in the Cleft of the  Rock as the Cleft Palate was taken away by the Orthodox Behavior of God while the Golden Calf was unable to Defend  itself from Destruction. In the Name of Full Disclosure, Scriptural Recitation is a Time Intensive Activity akin to Tilling a  Farm with the Tongue as the Plow that Requires Long Term Dedicated Practice.             1 Brettle, Jessica From:Mark Cox <markdarrellcox@icloud.com> Sent:Monday, October 21, 2019 5:27 PM To:jd@howardstern.com Subject:Bob Freedman (i) CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on  links.  ________________________________    The Rhetorical Question doesn't deserve to be Questioned with a Question Mark.    [:;]    So here is the Candidate for Noel Leary "Bob Freedom." Bob, can you tell Me about yourself? Are you an Active Member  of the Leary Cult or are you hiding from your Leary Mafia Family under Bob "Paste Over" Freedman while the Leary  Mafia Cult Markets and Distributes Heroin to Functional United States Junkies while also grooming the Upcoming  Generation to Believe in Opium as they continue to Abduct and Indoctrinate Small Children to serve as Indentured  Manipulated Minions? What Say Ye Bobbing? Of course we're assuming Apple Bobbing is Noel Null Leary with My  Birthday. Drop off a Hair Sample and Allow Every "DNA Units" to Test Portions of Your Head. We know Kelly Laurene is  so terrified People will learn who Kelly that Laurene stuffs Companies up her Ass like it's the Gate to the Underworld.  DNA Companies : See Her Rectum Portal.  1 Brettle, Jessica From:Mark Cox <markdarrellcox@icloud.com> Sent:Thursday, October 17, 2019 1:53 PM To:jd@howardstern.com Subject:Cellophane Flowers (i) edit CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on  links.  ________________________________    Hence to fail to strictly separate Milk and Meat is to be One who Bites the Hand that Feeds Them as the Breast here is  the Hand, and the Meat came from the Female by her Womb and therefore the Meat is the Extension of the Mother as  the Offspring was drawn from the Female and thus to Combine Milk and Meat is to be One who has Bitten Off the Teats  of the Breast while Drinking the Milk and though in this Case the Blood might have been drawn off the Damage is  nevertheless the imposition of a Fault Line into One's Character and so They should expect a Rod of Correction to Inflict  Them.    [:;]    I misquoted. That's the Problem of Not Memorizing the Lyric. It's "Look for the Girl with the Sun in Her Eyes and She's  Gone." What's that mean? They had the Sense to Not Stare. They looked away then of course were still curious whether  they really liked the song. Is this really conscious in this lyric. That's Unknown to Me. What the Deeper Interplay Here?  The Early Childhood Memory of Seeing the Mothers Eyes like Sunlight and then She Breast Feeds her Baby until the Day  the Child is Weaned. A Little Applause and the Memory is there even if you don't know it consciously. Does anyone  remember being Breast Fed by their Mother? I don't. That wasn't part of My Experience. I was taken on the Day of Birth.  John got the Letter. This Letter will later became a Part of the Song of this Day. He blew his Mind Out in a Car invokes  the Still Born Child and the Sent Letter that was the News. The Laugh isn't that Kind of Laugh. It's Another Kind of Laugh.   Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds is the Mother with Her Breasts as the Baby looks up before the Nurse Maid Session  begins. The Song is about Motherhood. Growing Up.    Where do We Live? In the Milky Way. Does the Child Bite Off the Meat of the Mothers Breasts? No, of course not. So are  we to Maintain a Strict Separation of Flesh and Milk?    [:;]    That's Being on the Stage of The Beatle Hyper Dome and Women are showing their Breasts like Fresh Wrapped Product  in the Market in the New Clear Cellophane Wrap.    Yellow and Green. Yelling, Agreeably. "I think they might like this Song. They're all on Acetate. Please Please Me? Um.  We weren't really being that Literal. It's just a Song."    In the follow up to We're "More Popular Than Jesus" Interview John Lennon said he wasn't Anti‐God but John Lennon  did that he didn't think God was not an "Old Man in the Sky" which touches on Michael Angelo's Painting Skills. So when  the Chorus of "Lucy in the Sky" appears it's a Metaphor of the Unity of God as opposed to the Division of Man in that on  the Fourth Day of God even as The Tetragrammaton is Four Characters the Luminaries for Illumination are placed in the  Firmament the Heaven which is the Space Made for Luminaries on the Second Day of God when the Firmament is Made  and the Firmament is called Heaven even as the Two Heh's of the Tetragrammaton are in the Second and the Fourth  Position correspond to the Second Day and the Fourth Day where the Vehicles for Illumination are Created to Occupy  2 and Illuminate the Space Created on the Second Day of God of ΘΕΟΣ of Non Defective Elohim who doesn't need a Holem  from the Emperor to Replace the Waw. These Luminaries in the Class of Planets with Life Potential on the Third Planet of  their Solar System are Two in Number as Great Luminaries with Parental Radiant Beating Sunlight and Maternal  Reflective Diffuse Moonlight with the Stars that are Diamonds of a Vast Number maybe Forty Trillion Stars if the Count  were Known and the Thing to Remember is that there is No Light from the Moon in the Night without the Reflection  from the Solar Sun that is Hidden by the Night as the Earth has Spun it's Face so the Very Presence of Moonlight is an  Expression of the Unity of God of Paternal and Maternal of Direct Beating Heart on the Left Side of the Chest the  Firmament and of Sacred Hallowed Space on the Right Side of the Chest the Firmament and the Two Heh's are to Never  Be Removed from the Tetragrammaton the HA and the AH are Forever Joined. The Seas likewise are Formed between  the Second and the Fourth Days of God and even as the Nightlight of Moonlight is Dependent on the the Radiance of the  Presence of the Solar Sun the Tides of the Seas are dependent on the Presence of the Moon as Life is likewise dependent  on Water for Animation. So Breasts on a Woman are Symbolic Metaphors of the Unity of Elohim "92" the Lucid Divine  Unified Creator Deity with Stars in His Possession that are a Vast Sea of Diamonds in the Vault of Heaven.    Of course later the Buddhist Drift would lead to Lyrics suggesting the Listener to Imagine there is no Heaven but then  The Listener would have to Imagine there are No Luminaries in the Heaven for there is No Heaven even as the Belief in  Buddhism and also Jainism is that there is No Creator Deity and Neither is One to Burn the Flame of Recitation of Sacred  Literal Truth Scripture as Silence is the Rapture of Thought but the Buddhist who Takes this to the Limits of Existence  turns his Body into an Inanimate Sitting Shrine that Neither Breaths nor Lives and the Spirit of this Adherent is limited to  the Confines of the Small Space of the Room where the Body Sits. Jainism is created in opposition to their Brahmin  Priests whose very Name suggests a Belief in Heaven. As to the Kaleidoscope Eyes of the Woman who Disappears either  the Woman resumed her Modest Poise as a Member of the Audience Hyper Dome after the Applause in Hysteria or Else  the Woman who was Unable to the World was No Longer Blinded. Whatever was really going on was Beyond the Ability  of the Participants to Continue with the Operation of the Gifts Bestowed to their Lineage of their Family Tree as the  Training Required to Manage and Operate with their Gifts was Absent and Unknown though indeed Secretive Members  of the Kindred of John Lennon keep Themselves Guardedly Privy to these Manifests Gifts across Generations of Cultic  Savvy Clandestine Factions who Absorb Light without Emanating Light as They Covet the Conspiratorial Stealing of the  Future from the Masses by Laying in Wait with Open Ears to the Naive Family Members who Exhibit these Gifts at an  Early Age yet Fail their Tests of Deceit in Caged and Uncaged "Script" Training in their Respective "Family" Homes.  1 Brettle, Jessica From:Press strong <pressstrong@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, October 22, 2019 9:32 PM To:mhuntsman@oig.lacounty.gov; PEliasberg@aclusocal.org; peliasberg@aclu-sc.org; kristina.loquist@bos.sccgov.org; micaela.hellman-tincher@bos.sccgov.org; brian.pascal@bos.sccgov.org; antonia.zavala@bos.sccgov.org; candace.joy@bos.sccgov.org; christine.m.stavem@bos.sccgov.org; evelyn.lopez@bos.sccgov.org; stacey.greenwell@bos.sccgov.org; heather.wilson@bos.sccgov.org; francisco.villalob01@bos.sccgov.org; kira.fields@bos.sccgov.org; christopher.hoem@bos.sccgov.org; cindy.chavez@bos.sccgov.org; scott.strickland@bos.sccgov.org; maja.marjanovic@bos.sccgov.org; Victor.Perez@bos.sccgov.org; Kathy.Truong@bos.sccgov.org; donald.rocha@bos.sccgov.org; enrique.flores01@bos.sccgov.org; joanna.molina01@bos.sccgov.org; tara.sreekrishnan@bos.sccgov.org; Derrick.Seaver@bos.sccgov.org; Angelica.Ramos@bos.sccgov.org; David.Fernandez01@bos.sccgov.org; Yvonne.Jimenez@bos.sccgov.org; Basil.Saleh@bos.sccgov.org; COB-Info@cob.sccgov.org; Council, City; Stump, Molly; Shikada, Ed; michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com Cc:jcrook@aclunc.org; YHaile@aclunc.org; MLee@aclunc.org; sriordan@aclunc.org; asoltani@aclunc.org; christina.villacorte@dailynews.com; tvo@bayareanewsgroup.com; mayoremail@sanjoseca.gov; District1@sanjoseca.gov; District3@sanjoseca.gov; christina.m.ramos@sanjoseca.gov; raquel.vegas@sanjoseca.gov; david.gomez@sanjoseca.gov; raania.mohsen@sanjoseca.gov; District5@sanjoseca.gov; District7@sanjoseca.gov; District9 @sanjoseca.gov; District10@sanjoseca.gov; grace.kobylinski@sanjoseca.gov; Jose.Salcido@sanjoseca.gov; district8@sanjoseca.gov; district6@sanjoseca.gov; District4 @sanjoseca.gov; District2@sanjoseca.gov; firstdistrict@bos.lacounty.gov; seconddistrict@bos.lacounty.gov; thirddistrict@bos.lacounty.gov; fourthdistrict@bos.lacounty.gov; fifthdistrict@bos.lacounty.gov; Kathryn@bos.lacounty.gov; Kyla.Coates@bos.lacounty.gov; KCoates@bos.lacounty.gov; Coates@bos.lacounty.gov; aayala@bos.lacounty.gov; lmandel@bos.lacounty.gov; bclayton@bos.lacounty.gov; mccastillo@bos.lacounty.gov; ghayes@bos.lacounty.gov; mrysman@bos.lacounty.gov; rspadilla@bos.lacounty.gov; ayoung@bos.lacounty.gov; jjimenez@bos.lacounty.gov Subject:Gennaco to oversee Santa Clara Jails Attachments:Pleading for Job back LASD The Critical Need for Oversight to Be Involved in LASD's Disciplinary Process.pdf CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.    Despite being fired by the County of Los Angeles for his office's deliberate negligence in overseeing the L.A. County Jail Corruption  and Abuses the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors has hired Michael Gennaco to oversee the Santa Clara Jails and Sheriff's  Office.  https://www.mercurynews.com/2019/10/10/santa‐clara‐county‐picks‐civilian‐watchdog‐to‐monitor‐sheriff‐jails/    https://www.dailynews.com/2014/03/18/inspector‐general‐end‐la‐county‐contracts‐with‐office‐of‐independent‐review‐special‐counsel‐merrick‐bobb/    Gennaco was in charge of oversight when the DOJ condemned the L.A. Sheriff Stations of Palmdale and Lancaster for  violating the civil rights of minorities by employing unlawful searches, seizures and uses of excessive force.    https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/crt/legacy/2013/06/28/antelope_findings_6‐28‐13.pdf      It was during this time that current Palo Alto Police Chief Robert Jonsen was in charge of the Lancaster station and now  Gennaco is also the IPA of Palo Alto.    2                 3             4   Emotions run high at town hall meeting  by M. Dilworth • November 29, 2011  http://theavtimes.com/2011/11/29/emotions‐run‐high‐at‐town‐hall‐meeting/        5 https://padailypost.com/2019/05/22/cops‐use‐of‐n‐word‐led‐to‐investigation‐that‐never‐became‐public/    https://padailypost.com/2019/10/14/report‐on‐police‐n‐word‐incident‐bottled‐up‐at‐city‐hall/      14 Missing Videos under Gennaco's Supervision:  https://corruptpaloaltopolice.weebly.com/missing‐videos.html        https://corruptpaloaltopolice.weebly.com/chief‐jonsen.html      The LIES of Michael Gennaco:  https://michaelgennacooir.weebly.com/      And it should be noted that members of the PAPD continue to persecute me for exposing their corruption.  In fact the  word on the street is that Officers Parham and Moore have recently solicited another thug to seek me out to instigate an  altercation by which I can be wrongfully incriminated and arrested.  I cannot prove this, as it is just hearsay at the  present, but the evidence is mounting.    https://corruptpaloaltopolice.weebly.com/parham.html    https://corruptpaloaltopolice.weebly.com/moore.html        Parham and Moore and no doubt others in the PAPD will resort to just about any illegal tactic to silence citizens who  expose their corruption.  https://corruptpaloaltopolice.weebly.com/911.html        PC 646.9.  (a) Any person who willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follows or willfully and maliciously harasses another person and who makes a credible threat with the intent to place that person in reasonable fear for his or her safety, or the safety of his or her immediate family is guilty of the crime of stalking,............   PC 182  (a) If two or more persons conspire:  (1) To commit any crime.  (2) Falsely and maliciously to indict another for any crime, or to procure another to be charged or arrested for any crime.  (5) To commit any act injurious to the public health, to public morals, or to pervert or obstruct justice, or the due administration of the laws.      Tony Ciampi              In its report, the CCJV found that OIR had enhanced the quality of the Department's investigations of Significant Force and the appropriate discipline for instances of misconduct. The CCJV emphasized that any centralized body would subsume and consolidate "all of the existing important oversight functions of Special Counsel, OIR, and the Ombudsman's office and utilize their existing expertise and knowledge of the [Sheriffs] Department". (Emphasis added.) The CCJV recognized the value of OIR's real-time input into internal investigative and disciplinary determinations and recommended that OIR become a "branch within the OIG". The only conclusion that can be drawn from the CCJV report is its recognition that real-time involvement in the Sheriff Department's disciplinary process need remain a necessary component of the oversight process. I am heartened that the plans to fund and staff the Office of Inspector General ("OIG") in a way that will allow it to have significantly more resources. Both the OIG and the CCJV noted that finite resources prevented it from achieving all that it could. As a result, identifying, auditing, and remedying systems issues were often deferred while OIR lawyers tended to the burden of reviewing real cases with tangible deadlines. However, with a budget over five times the size of OIR' s, it is my fervent hope that the program will not try to rely exclusively on systemic reform while leaving disciplinary decisions to the good will of the Department. My experience is that merely expecting that LASD will adhere to objective principles and hold its members accountable for violations of policy simply will not work. There is probably no more stubborn aspect of law enforcement culture than the reluctance to hold sworn officers accountable when they violate the organization's expectations. The reasons for the development and maintenance of this culture are too numerous for this letter, but it cannot be denied that the endemic lack of trust in law enforcement stems in large part from the perception that law enforcement does not fairly investigate its own and hold its brethren accountable when they stray. As a result of peace officer privacy protections, the shadows in which the disciplinary process functions adds to this perception of favoritism and lack of resolve. It is for these reasons that oversight entities throughout the country have clamored, mostly unsuccessfully, for a voice in the disciplinary process. I have heard many times from oversight practitioners throughout the country that they are frustrated by their inability to be heard with regard to case outcomes and discipline. They have coveted for their own oversight programs an involvement in discipline similar to that exercised by OIR. Because I do not believe either the County can afford to move backwards with regard to the oversight of its Sheriffs Department or that LASD can handle disciplinary decisions on its own, I sincerely hope that the OIG does not surrender this involvement by outside oversight that LASD has come to accept. The loss of trust a law enforcement agency suffers when questionable disciplinary decisions are exposed to the public was brought into focus recently on the front pages of the Los Angeles Times. See "LAPD Discipline Case Raises Question of Favoritism, LAPD Gets Suspension Over Lying About Racial Slur", Joel Rubin, Los Angeles Times, March 24, 2014. According to the article, LAPD's Chief of Police declined to terminate an officer who uttered a racial slur and lied about it during the Department's Internal Affairs investigation. Because neither LAPD's Police Commission nor its Inspector General have any real-time involvement in disciplinary decisions, the Chiefs decision to contravene the recommendation of LAPD's disciplinary board was made without any outside voice weighing in and went undetected by the Commission until an anonymous letter was sent to the Commission and the Times. The results of the LAPD case stand in sharp contrast to a case OIR was involved in and reported in its Tenth Annual Report. (http://www.laoir.com/reports/OIR-Tenth-Annual- Report.pdf. at page 103) Similar to LAPD's case, the LASD case involved a deputy who got into a fracas at a nightclub after consuming alcoholic beverages. While outside the establishment and again during an interview by outside agency investigators, the deputy was captured on tape making racist remarks. OIR closely followed the internal investigation and reviewed in real-time the tapes, interviews, and related materials. Originally, the LASD decision-maker was inclined not to terminate the deputy. However, after OIR urged him to personally review the audio and video evidence, he was persuaded to seek discharge. The deputy was terminated and recently, the County's Civil Service Commission upheld the firing. This case highlights the meaningfully different results achieved when an oversight entity is able to impact discipline decisions in real-time. In the LAPD case, despite the after the fact concerns raised by the Commission, it can do nothing at this point regarding the officer's employment status.1 In the LASD case, however, as a result of OIR being meaningfully involved in the decision-making process and insisting that the responsible executive make an evidence-based decision, a deputy that deserved to be fired was in fact separated from the Department. OIR's ongoing monitoring ensured that LASD maintained its resolve throughout the grievance process. As importantly, OIR's commitment to transparency led us to discuss the case in a public report. The Seattle Police Department has also recently been roiled in controversy regarding a questionable disciplinary decision. The Chief created a divide between his Department, the community, and City leaders when he eliminated an officer's one-day suspension for discourtesy and unprofessional conduct in dealing with a rep01ier. See, e.g., "Seattle May Calls it 'Mistake' to Clear Officer of Misconduct", KIRO Radio, February 24, 2014. http//mynorthwest.com/11/2464982/Seattle-mayor-calls-it-mistake-to-clear-officer-of- misconduct. The Seattle PD has a civilian monitor but that monitor does not have to be consulted before discipline is undone. 1 The Commission does have the authority to evaluate and fire the Chief. Because the Sheriff is an elected official not subject to similar review, any after-the-fact finger-wagging at him will not be as effective. By contrast, LASD implemented a written policy requiring its decision-makers to consult OIR prior to either reaching or modifying a disciplinary decision. This policy helps to ensure that any reductions in discipline are based on newly discovered facts and not favoritism or a misrepresentation of the facts by an employee's advocate. In the year following the implementation of the policy, reductions in discipline at LASD were reduced by 20%. Without an outside entity looking over their shoulders, I have little doubt that LASD executives will similarly undo disciplinary decisions out of sympathy or lack of resolve. The plan to curtail oversight's real-time participation in the disciplinary process could have ramifications for other entities reviewing County practices. In its work throughout the country, the United States Department of Justice ("USDOJ") examines and assesses oversight's impact on the disciplinary process when it determines whether the agency has developed a "pattern and practice" of Constitutional violations. If there is no oversight in the Sheriff Department's disciplinary process, it could have an impact on how USDOJ eventually completes that calculus. OIR has been asked repeatedly why the County's brand of oversight for the past two decades could not prevent the situation in the jails from occurring. First, it will never be known what additional corruption or erosion of progressive policing would have occurred but not for the existence and work of OIR, Special Counsel, and the Office of the Ombudsman. Second, as stated by the CCJV, limited resources for oversight prevented more important work from being done such as continual oversight over less significant force in the jails. However, and perhaps most importantly, while oversight is a necessary component of progressive policing, the most robust oversight mechanism alone is not sufficient to ensure that large law enforcement agencies perform in accord with modem day expectations. Ultimately, the leadership of the organization must ensure that its members are performing consistently with their oath of office and that those he or she delegates with authority similarly imbue the organization with those values. When there is significant messaging and influence that runs counter to values-based policing, the most robust oversight will not be able to entirely stem that deleterious tide. I hope you will consider the points set out above in helping to set the course for oversight of the Sheriff's Department. Very truly yours, A~-Michael be~acJ -· Chief Attorney Office of Independent Review cc: Carl Gallucci, Justice Deputy, Supervisor Don Knabe Anna Pembedjian, Justice Deputy, Supervisor Michael D. Antonovich Sergio Vasquez, Justice Deputy, Supervisor Gloria Molina Michelle Cervera, Justice Deputy, Supervisor Gloria Molina Joseph P. Charney, Justice Deputy, Supervisor Zev Yaroslavsky Alex Johnson, Deputy for Public Safety and Education, Supervisor Mark Ridley-Thomas Vince Harris, Senior Policy Advisor and Special Assistant, Supervisor Mark Ridley- Thomas William T Fujioka, Chief Executive Officer, County of Los Angeles John F. Krattli, County Counsel, Office of the County Counsel Roger Granbo, Assistant County Counsel, Office of the County Counsel John Scott, Sheriff, Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department Neal Tyler, Chief Executive Officer, Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department Max Huntsman, Inspector General, Office of Inspector General 1 Brettle, Jessica From:Mark Cox <markdarrellcox@icloud.com> Sent:Saturday, October 19, 2019 6:42 PM To:jd@howardstern.com Cc:MediaInquiries@kushner.com Subject:Heritage Line Driven CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on  links.  ________________________________    To say that a Hebrew Father's Child is not Jewish by virtue of the Woman's lack of Hebrew Descent is to assume the  Jewish Father's Wife is a Whore. Likewise to say that in contrast that a Hebrew Mother's Child is Automatically Jewish is  to endorse Whoredom by Hebrew Women. "Don't worry. If the Client gets you Pregnant the Kid will be Jewish  regardless of whether you receive a generous tip from the Father." Likewise a Jewish Man could be told, "You can sleep  with as Many Gentile Whores on your Next Trip to Rome as you like, the Kids will all be Disposable Gentiles. What stays  in Rome isn't your Problem." This is really a case of both orphaning and disowning one's own children to the detriment  of Israel. In actual cases of bona fide infidelity then provided the male children are circumcised and want to be Jewish  then given that the Stranger in the Midst of the Children of Israel is to be Under the Same Law as the Children of Israel  then given that they are in the Same Household then they should be treated as Children of the Same Household in Full  Equality to Biological Children of the Household provided the Couple doesn't Separate. Hence Donor Seed given to a  Couple to Foster Reproductivity should be given Equal Footing to All the Children of the Household without any Denial of  their Heritage. The Caution with Donor Seed is that Couples should factually know the disposition and the character of  Seed Donor because otherwise you don't really know what you're getting given there is not likely even a Single Fertility  Clinic that conducts a DNA Background Check on the Stored Seed of a Former Donor to ensure they aren't wanted for a  String of Unsolved Murders.    Lineage Heritage —> Lineage Heri Tage —> Lineage Harry Tage —> Lineage Harry Page —> Liar Harry Page —> White  Liar Page —> White Larry Page —> Google Larry Page —> Look at the White Space of Larry's Google Page —> It's a Good  Lie a White Lie Just a Little Fable about Who is Larry Page —> Larry :: Laurentum :: Regarded by Roman Writers as the  Original Capital of Italy :: Derived from Laurel Trees :: Roman Emperors are associated with Laurel Trees which are  associated with Apollo :: Augustus flanked the Entrance to his Residence on the Palatine Hill with Two Laurel Trees and  the Palatine Hill Residence of Augustus is associated with the Temple of Apollo Palatinus the Second Temple built to  Apollo ((In Latin Jurisdictions not inclusive of Greek Regions, "Presumably")) who was the Patron God of Augustus and  the Temple of Apollo Palatinus is connected to the Residence of Augustus via Frescoed Halls and Corridors and the  Temple Apollo Palatinus was built where a Bolt of Lightening had struck the Property of Augustus the First Emperor who  begins the Roman Pax :: Apollo was the National Divinity of the Greeks and became associated by 500 BC with the Titan  Sun God "Helios" ((Hell iOS :: Who helped Jeff Steve with Naming Conventions?)) :: Apollo's Older Related Term is  ((Apparently)) Paean :: Would Paean relate to Pantheon? :: Kelly Jean Leary's False Untrue by Name  is "Laurene Powell  Jobs" to wit the Namesake of Intentional Nomenclature the Revelation of id is Laurel "Double Entry" Powell "Apollo" ::  Through "Kelly Pinhole" the Camera Sketch is Coveting Unlimited National Powers :: Meanwhile what does Larry "Web"  Page Spiderman want besides a Re(a)d Costume? :: Peter Parker is the Creation of Stan Lee :: Lee, Larry :: Must be a Fan  :: Urban Climbing.  1 Brettle, Jessica From:mark weiss <earwopa@yahoo.com> Sent:Tuesday, October 22, 2019 2:09 PM To:Neilson Buchanan Cc:Council, City; Joe"Joe Simitian Subject:Re: Important GUP Meeting Tomorrow: Your ACTION needed! CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.  i got a sports marketing class with Andy Dolich on Tuesdays plus prepping my free show with Tom Harrell Thursday at PAAC and Friday Hands of Orlac at the Mitch. mark On Monday, October 21, 2019, 02:20:48 PM PDT, Neilson Buchanan <cnsbuchanan@yahoo.com> wrote: Dear Friends and Neighbors, This is very important and you can make a difference. #1 Come to the Palo Alto City Hall tomorrow at . Your presence will make a difference of millions of dollars. #2 If you cannot attend Tuesday night, then send an email of support to our city council and our County Supervisor Joe Simitian city.council@cityofpaloalto.org supervisor.simitian@bos.sccgov.org Here is link to the official meeting notice. https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?t=60349.04&BlobID=73749 Here is an excellent opinion from four leading Palo Alto residents. More articles are online. Guest Opinion: Stanford GUP should not be negotiated in secret    2 Guest Opinion: Stanford GUP should not be negotiated in secret Pat Burt, Todd Collins, Alice Kaufman and Nadia Naik We hope many others in the community will speak up and let the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors know what...    Neilson Buchanan 155 Bryant Street Palo Alto, CA 94301 650 329-0484 650 537-9611 cell cnsbuchanan@yahoo.com ----- Forwarded Message ----- From: Peter Drekmeier <pdrekmeier@earthlink.net> To: Peter Drekmeier <pdrekmeier@earthlink.net> Sent: Monday, October 21, 2019, 10:01:45 AM PDT Subject: Important GUP Meeting Tomorrow Hi Folks, Tomorrow evening the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors will hold it’s only hearing in Palo Alto on the Stanford General Use Permit (GUP), so it’s critical we have a big turnout. A final decision will likely be made at their November 5 meeting in San Jose — we’re down to the wire. Please attend and bring friends! Stanford’s General Use Permit (GUP) Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors Tuesday, October 22, 6:00pm Palo Alto City Council Chambers 250 Hamilton Ave., Palo Alto Both the County Planning Department and Planning Commission have supported Conditions of Approval based on Full Mitigation. We need to support these recommendations, and encourage the Supervisors to adopt them. Some facts to consider: This is the largest development plan ever considered by the County. It would increase the Stanford campus by 20%, and add 9,610 new people. Stanford's proposed development is the equivalent of two-and-a-half new Stanford Shopping Centers. The Plan would create the need for 2,172 housing units, but Stanford has proposed building only 550 units. The County is considering requiring Stanford to build all of the needed housing so as not to exacerbate the housing crisis. Being a “non-profit,” Stanford University residents and academic facilities do not pay property taxes. This places a huge burden on public schools, infrastructure and community services. This issue must be addressed. It’s not fair for Stanford to privatize the benefits and socialize the costs. My personal opinion is that the County should reduce Stanford’s academic development entitlements, and require more housing to make up for past deficits. However, if they do move forward with this massive project, the Stanford foothills should be dedicated as permanent open space. 3 Traffic, traffic, traffic! Need I say more? You can review our petition to the Board of Supervisors at https://www.ipetitions.com/petition/support-sustainable- development-at-stanford. Many thanks to those of you who already signed it. If you haven’t, there’s still time to do so. Please feel free to share with friends, along with an invitation to attend tomorrow’s hearing. I hope to see you there! -Peter ----------------------------------- Peter Drekmeier pdrekmeier@earthlink.net (650) 223-3333 1 Brettle, Jessica From:Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org> Sent:Monday, October 21, 2019 3:16 PM To:Loran Harding; dennisbalakian; David Balakian; Dan Richard; Daniel Zack; Doug Vagim; Steve Wayte; Mark Standriff; midge@thebarretts.com; Mark Kreutzer; Mark Waldrep; info@superide1.com; Joel Stiner; huidentalsanmateo; nick yovino; paul.caprioglio; esmeralda.soria@fresno.gov; Mayor; Irv Weissman; bballpod; robert.andersen; beachrides; becerra.bere11@gmail.com; Leodies Buchanan; bearwithme1016@att.net; Cathy Lewis; Council, City; Raymond Rivas; francis.collins@nih.gov; fmerlo@wildelectric.net; Steven Feinstein; grinellelake@yahoo.com; steve.hogg; hennessy; jerry ruopoli; newsdesk; kfsndesk; kwalsh@kmaxtv.com; leager; mike; pavenjitdhillon@yahoo.com; popoff; russ@topperjewelers.com; shanhui.fan@stanford.edu; yicui@stanford.edu; terry; vallesR1969@att.net Subject:Fwd: Jensen Huang- Self Driving Car tech-well worth seeing CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.    ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Forwarded message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐  From: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org>  Date: Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 2:32 PM  Subject: Fwd: Jensen Huang‐ Self Driving Car tech‐well worth seeing  To: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org>      ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Forwarded message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐  From: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org>  Date: Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 2:23 PM  Subject: Fwd: Jensen Huang‐ Self Driving Car tech‐well worth seeing  To: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org>      ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Forwarded message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐  From: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org>  Date: Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 1:53 PM  Subject: Fwd: Jensen Huang‐ Self Driving Car tech‐well worth seeing  To: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org>      ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Forwarded message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐  From: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org>  Date: Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 1:27 PM  Subject: Fwd: Jensen Huang‐ Self Driving Car tech‐well worth seeing  To: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org>  2     ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Forwarded message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐  From: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org>  Date: Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 1:20 PM  Subject: Fwd: Jensen Huang‐ Self Driving Car tech‐well worth seeing  To: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org>      ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Forwarded message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐  From: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org>  Date: Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 1:12 PM  Subject: Fwd: Jensen Huang‐ Self Driving Car tech‐well worth seeing  To: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org>      ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Forwarded message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐  From: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org>  Date: Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:55 PM  Subject: Fwd: Jensen Huang‐ Self Driving Car tech‐well worth seeing  To: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org>      ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Forwarded message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐  From: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org>  Date: Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 12:39 PM  Subject: Fwd: Jensen Huang‐ Self Driving Car tech‐well worth seeing  To: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org>      ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Forwarded message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐  From: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org>  Date: Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 3:16 PM  Subject: Fwd: Jensen Huang‐ Self Driving Car tech‐well worth seeing  To: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org>      ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Forwarded message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐  From: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org>  Date: Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 4:53 PM  Subject: Fwd: Jensen Huang‐ Self Driving Car tech‐well worth seeing  To: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org>  3     ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Forwarded message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐  From: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org>  Date: Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 4:51 PM  Subject: Fwd: Jensen Huang‐ Self Driving Car tech‐well worth seeing  To: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org>      ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Forwarded message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐  From: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org>  Date: Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 4:13 PM  Subject: Fwd: Jensen Huang‐ Self Driving Car tech‐well worth seeing  To: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org>      ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Forwarded message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐  From: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org>  Date: Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 3:24 PM  Subject: Fwd: Jensen Huang‐ Self Driving Car tech‐well worth seeing  To: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org>      ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Forwarded message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐  From: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org>  Date: Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 2:42 PM  Subject: Fwd: Jensen Huang‐ Self Driving Car tech‐well worth seeing  To: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org>      ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Forwarded message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐  From: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org>  Date: Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 2:17 PM  Subject: Fwd: Jensen Huang‐ Self Driving Car tech‐well worth seeing  To: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org>      ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Forwarded message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐  From: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org>  Date: Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 2:09 PM  Subject: Jensen Huang‐ Self Driving Car tech‐well worth seeing  To: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org>  4             Monday, October 21, 2019                To all‐  Here is Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang on self driving car tech. I B more NVDA shares Friday. Sure hope NVDA  turns out to be another Apple. $1,000 invested in Apple in 1990 was worth $895,000 at the end of 1999, top of the dot  com bubble.               https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_rC2KsROMMU                   Self driving safety report, 2018 from Nvidia, if you want to read about it in detail. One can learn a lot here:    https://www.nvidia.com/content/dam/en‐zz/Solutions/self‐driving‐cars/safety‐report/NVIDIA‐Self‐Driving‐Safety‐ Report‐2018.pdf                            More amazing stuff re autonomy in transportation. Ask yourself if Nvidia has a future. Are GM and Ford, and all of  the other car makers, doing all of this? Of course not. They'll buy most of it from Nvidia. Many of the big players are  working with Nvidia to develop this. See the ecosystem of partners here:                  This is well worth seeing if anyone thinks that autonomous vehicles are a pipe dream. Click in this link on  "Autonomous Vehicle Ecosystem". There, click on "Meet our Ecosystem". There, you see, in order as you scroll,  Featured Stories, Cars, Trucks, Mobility Systems, Tier 1 Suppliers, Research, Sensors/ Hardware, Software, Mapping.  You  can click on each organization and see what they are doing in this field. If it's a pipe dream, a lot of organizations are  spending big money on the pipe dream.                    Just under Mercedes Benz under "Cars", I nearly wore out my mouse scrolling. For some reason, you also see  info. there re. AI in reading mamograms, detecting an eye problem in newborns that can cause blindness, and  more.  And under "Trucks", Peterbuilt, you eventually get to "Face Time: How AI can diagnose rare genetic diseases  faster".  In one of these you see how AI can help radiologists detect brain tumors. Somewhere Nvidia shows how their AI  can help spot lung tumors the rad. might miss. With my luck, I'll get both.                      I strongly recommend "Meet our Ecosystem".                     https://www.nvidia.com/en‐us/industries/transportation/                     GTC 2019 Keynote with Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang.   If you are not impressed by this, you're hard to impress:                  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z2XlNfCtxwI               GTC 2015  Jensen Huang interviews Elon Musk: Two multi‐billionaires at the forefront of self‐driving cars, even  then. More so now:                https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TDm6Snkle70                Great vid. re preparing the Tesla plant in Fremont (former GM‐Toyota NUMI plant) to build the Model 3.  Commenters here gripe that it is from 2012, with updates, but I found it fascinating nonetheless:    5            Note that they mention 3G being used for the infotainment system. That dates it. Think of what 5G will do‐‐ a LOT  for the automotive world: Cars talking to each other, e.g. Ten minutes in you'll be glad you watched this.                 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rD9PGi8hHvY                Bear in mind that autonomous driving tech is just one of the major businesses from which Nvidia derives  revenues. Gaming, data centers, medical imaging are others.                My NVDA shares only jumped ~$5 today. I fear that a huge run up would produce more of those guilt feelings in  me from getting easy money.                              L. William Harding               Fresno                                             1 Brettle, Jessica From:Mark Cox <markdarrellcox@icloud.com> Sent:Thursday, October 17, 2019 4:56 PM To:press@makeitnicenyc.com Subject:Laurene Powell Jobs CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on  links.  ________________________________    Does Daniel Humm realize that Laurene Powell Jobs is Kelly Jean Leary and that Kelly Laurene is Irish Mafia of the Leary  Faction of the Irish Mafia? Kelly knows how to Keep her Mouth Shut except of course when she's eating. Her Quiet Lying  Parents taught Kelly very well. Her Parents are Not Dead Yet. They live under the Aliases of Ron Tomczak and Jane  Kingsley Tomczak. Their Names in 1977 were Jon Leary and Hannah Murphy Leary. This is the Year they staged the False  Untrue Murder of Kelly's Eldest Brother "Jon C Leary" in saying their Son died of 26 Stab Wounds including to the Face  and the Eyes. Hence the Convenience of a Closed Casket Funeral. That was simply a Training Exercise for Jonny Leary as  Jonny did not Die. Here's a Picture ((Below)) of Jonny under his Alias of Brian Schrier after growing up. Jonny could have  a Hundred Different Aliases, and Every One of Them are Government Issue Identity Cards because the Cultic Irish Mob  Families are Quietly Connected to a Clean Looking Deceitful Government. The Weeds have grown Roots that are Choking  the United States. Steve Jobs is Dead? No, Steve Jobs is Abducted. Stanford lied about Cancer for Money. The Cook  administered Custom Designer Poison and Tim Cook is Agent of Laurene. They Hack from Inside Apple. Don't Worry,  Laurene Powell Jobs will Read this. My Family likes Reading Me. And if you're using iOS you've already been read like a  Book. It gets worse, Steve Jobs adoptive Name in 1972 is Jeff Laird and Jeff's Brother is Mike Laird and Mike Laird is  Howard Stern. So what should you say to Kelly of the 'O' Less Learys the Opium Branders of "Here's the O" "Heroin" ...  Maybe make a lot of 'O' sounds in your Dialogue. How do you protect yourself from Kelly Laurene? Start Memorizing the  Greek Septuagint of the Sixtine Text of the (1586) 1587 Printing beginning with Genesis to Joshua because the Torah is  Six Books not Five Books, and Elohim (םיהולא) in Hebrew is Six Characters not Five Characters (םיהלא), and Elohim  finishes His Work on the Sixth Day not the Seventh Day : Thats the Meaning of Six Six Six the Antichrist is like Antipasto.  When is the Day you saw the Main Course terrified of the Antipasto? Are you savvy on Kosher Meat? On Salting to  Remove Blood? On separating Milk and Meat so your Cliental aren't Cursed like Children who Bite off the Teats of their  Nursemaids?    2     1 Brettle, Jessica From:Ann Protter <ann.protter@gmail.com> Sent:Wednesday, October 23, 2019 8:37 AM To:Council, City; Kamhi, Philip Subject:Made the news!!! CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.    Dear City Council Members,    You probably already know, but making residents pay for parking made the news (see attached clip).   (KPIX Chanel 5  11PM news)    I wonder if you would be willing to modify the RPP to allow one free parking permit per household?   Not sure what that  would take, but it would make a very nice story and be a reasonable gesture to the Old Palo Alto residents.    Thanks,  Ann  1 Brettle, Jessica From:Minor, Beth Sent:Monday, October 21, 2019 3:07 PM To:Turner, Andrew; Council, City Subject:RE: Message from the City Council Home Page Hi Andrew,    You can speak under Oral Communications as this is not on any of Council’s upcoming agendas.  The time of the item  varies each week as it depends on what is on the agenda before Oral Communications.  Depending on how many  speakers there are, each speaker would be allowed 2‐3 minutes and the Mayor announces at the beginning of the item  how long each speaker has.      You will need to submit a speaker card to me, they are located in the back of the Chambers or on the ½ where I  sit.  Once we have received your card we will put it in the pile with the others and your name will appear on the screen  on the wall, you will be able to see who comes before you and after you.      Let me know if you have any other questions.    Thanks and have a great day.    B‐    Beth Minor, City Clerk  City of Palo Alto  250 Hamilton Avenue  Palo Alto, CA 94301   (650)329‐2379        From: Turner, Andrew <Andrew.Turner@maxar.com>   Sent: Friday, October 18, 2019 4:43 PM  To: Council, City <city.council@cityofpaloalto.org>  Subject: Message from the City Council Home Page    CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.  Hello, I would like to speak briefly at one of your city council meetings‐‐looks like they are on Monday evenings at 5 PM‐‐ about the roundabout at Meadow and Ross.  I’ve had two accidents there on my bike because of car traffic, so now I  dismount and walk my bike across in the crosswalks.   I’d like the city to put up signs at the roundabouts to remind  motorists that they have to stop for pedestrians in the crosswalks.    2 Thanks,  Andy Turner    This message (including any attachments) may contain confidential information intended for a specific individual and  purpose. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and any attachments.   1 Brettle, Jessica From:Mark Cox <markdarrellcox@icloud.com> Sent:Monday, October 21, 2019 10:59 PM To:jd@howardstern.com Subject:Mia Farrow CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on  links.  ________________________________    Why can't Mia Farrow be Real? Of course her Son is Frank Sinatra's Son. Unless of course Woody Allen is Near of Kin to  Frank and levirated Frank's Seed before Frank died except Frank didn't die yet. Okay. Now. Given that the Kushner Leary  Deal was dependent upon Kushner Black Hands believing that Jonny Leary was Dead as of the Fourth Month April 6th  1977 then given the Learys could be related Kin to the Kennedys then could the intent of levirating the Seed of Dead Kin  of Someone who didn't Die invoke the Leviration of the Seed of Someone who did die which was JFK in retaliation to  JFK's Closure of the Nepotism Door of the White House to the Leary Underworld then could My Brother's High Horse Bag  of Seed Abby Normal "He Can Sing and Dance Very Well." "Cigar? No? Not yet? Keep Plowing? Okay. We got All Night."  ... MIXUP have levirated the Seed of JFK? The Question in this is how closely related are the Learys and Kennedys and  how Near of Kin do you have to be? JFK has an Obligation to Undo Favors granted to the Leary Irish Mafia and the Leary  Family has looming consequences to Face for their Litany of Pervasive Crimes that range from Opium Distribution to  Election Tampering to Abductions to Assassinations to Money Laundering to False Imprisonments to Stealing of Assets  to ..., It's a Long List of Hidden Things.  1 Brettle, Jessica From:Jack Hopkins <JackH@streetsteam.org> Sent:Friday, October 18, 2019 3:19 PM To:Council, City Subject:Martin Luther King Day of Service CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.  To Whom It May Concern:    My name is Jack Hopkins, I am in charge of community engagement for the Palo Alto branch of Downtown Streets Team.  If you haven’t heard of us, Downtown Streets Team's mission is to build Teams that restore dignity, hope and purpose,  and provide a path to recover from homelessness. Unhoused residents volunteer in work experience teams, beautifying  their community in exchange for basic needs stipends, case management and employment services. The peer‐led model  provides a meaningful daily activity to participants, while encouraging accountability and fostering a community of  support. I am reaching out to see how the city of Palo Alto would feel to having some of our Team Members and a group  of volunteers come out for the national day of service and help beautify some of Palo Alto’s parks? This idea is currently  in its infancy while I figure out the logistics and specifics involved in a day of service, but please don’t hesitate to contact  me so we can discuss it further.    Many Thanks,  Jack Hopkins  AmeriCorps Fellow, Community Engagement  Downtown Streets Team  Mobile: (628) 600‐8310  1 Brettle, Jessica From:jeffrey lipkin <repjal@att.net> Sent:Wednesday, October 16, 2019 3:41 PM To:Council, City Subject:Fwd: [GA2] Nightmare on Arastradero Corridor:The Road .....Paved With Good Intentions City Council,    Why don't you install speed humps on Georgia, Donald and Hubbart?    It defies logic that you have not done this. What went through your minds when you decided to spend $12 million on  the monstrous and dangerous Arastradero project, but you didn't do simple speed humps at the Georgia cut‐through?    Is this a simple case of incompetent city employees who justify their salaries by stupid and expensive projects, and a  Council that does likewise?    Jeff Lipkin      Sent from my iPhone    Begin forwarded message:  From: "William Chrisman towillchris@gmail.com [greenacres2]" <greenacres2‐ noreply@yahoogroups.com>  Date: October 16, 2019 at 3:27:02 PM PDT  To: betty <betty_cho@yahoo.com>  Cc: Ruchita Parat <Ruchita@yahoo.com>, Holly Boyd <holly.boyd@cityofpaloalto.org>, Eva Gal  <evahgal@gmail.com>, City Mgr <CityMgr@cityofpaloalto.org>, city.council@cityofpaloalto.org, Reply  to group <greenacres2@yahoogroups.com>  Subject: Re:  [GA2] Nightmare on Arastradero Corridor:The Road .....Paved With Good Intentions  Reply‐To: William Chrisman <towillchris@gmail.com>      Dear Neighbors, I support your effort to get word Arastradero has been made far worse, out to City Council. As well, has anybody else noticed the sudden uptic in Gunn High spillover traffic volume is making an already potentially dangerous situation for pedestrians and bicyclists on Donald, Georgia and Hubbart, even more potentially dangerous for pedestrians and bicyclists? Sincerely, William   On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 8:16 PM betty betty_cho@yahoo.com [greenacres2] <greenacres2‐ noreply@yahoogroups.com> wrote:      [Attachment(s) from betty included below]   2 Dear City Manager  and councils,  Another accident occurred this evening. The Tow truck was near the intersection of Arastradero  and Coulombe. I didn’t see the accident. But the family lives near the intersection said it was caused by  the barriers.    Do we have to wait for a serious fatal accidents to happen at this intersection before the city will take  action  to remove this danger from our neighborhood?        Betty Cho    On Aug 21, 2019, at 10:46 AM, Ruchita Parat Ruchita@yahoo.com [greenacres2] <greenacres2‐ noreply@yahoogroups.com> wrote:      Hello, Most if us have been residents of this area for long time and do care for everyone's safety... We do think this new calming effort by the city could have been better. It is too late to mention but simple "speed bumps" would have been aesthetically more appealing, less costly and would do the job of slowing down.. Also- instead of constructing in the middle, giving that width to the bike lanes may have been better for all. 3 regards Ruchita On Wednesday, August 21, 2019, 10:40:51 AM PDT, Eva Gal evahgal@gmail.com [greenacres2] <greenacres2-noreply@yahoogroups.com> wrote: Ms. Boyd, Thank you for your response to my message on Mr. Shikeda’s behalf. I do appreciate the fact that messages get read. In my letter, I focused specifically on several of the dangerous omissions in the City's poorly designed and poorly executed plans for one corner on Arastradero Road. Nothing major. I chose not to get into the litany of all the other horrors you have created on this road, since other communications have dealt with those issues already. Sadly, your note to me completely ignores all these concerns. Instead, your note reiterates the same talking points and platitudes that you and your staff have voiced in the past. As we continue to share our concerns, please note that none of us question the positive intentionality of the redesign. Unfortunately, neither positive intentionality nor talking points and platitudes resolve the nightmare you have created for us in this neighborhood, and for everyone else using the Arastradero corridor. And, we all know where the the road paved with good intentions often leads…... In my message last week, I listed the following specific issues, to no avail: -As the students stack on bikes in the green slime box waiting to cross Arastradero, and as the students stack on bikes on the green stripes on Arastradero waiting to either cross to Fletcher or to go to Gunn, there is no space for cars to make a right turn to Donald even at the slowest speed-without jutting into the bike box or the waiting students. What. A. Nightmare!!! We warned staff about this, to no avail. -With all the so called planning that has gone into this realignment, the City has not bothered to activate/place a "no turn on red when students are present” sign at the four corners. (There is one well hidden at one corner, which is ignored by all) Safety concerns, City Staff?????? -The four corners at Donald/Arastradero and Terman Drive/Arastradero are still not painted red. Therefore, parents are stopping and dropping kids off at the corners; parking at the corner (I almost hit a car as as I turned right on to Donald from Arastradero going West)-all legally. Safety concerns, City Staff???? Once again, I am requesting that you Ms. Boyd, Mr. Shikeda or SOMEONE address each of the above issues, along with all the issues identified/shared by my neighbors, with specific plans to mitigate them. These are easily correctable issues. Correcting them would at least make one highly dangerous corner a little bit safer. (BTW, I saw that there is finally red curb paint at the corner of Arastradero and Georgia. I understand it took approximately four years of requests/complaints to achieve a 3 ft. long red marking. I am hoping that we do not have to wait four years for these corrections at Donald.) Your note lists one mitigating step that is supposed to help the dangerous situation on Arastradero: the addition of more signage/traffic warning devices to explain the very confusing situation that City Staff designed. Since one of the main issues is the 4 visual overload-arrows going in all directions, red, white, green, yellow, black markings, straight lines, jagged lines, arrows shifting directionally in short distances, parking signs in the middle of the road, bumper car protrusions along the street, lack of turning radius at corners-could you please explain to the uninitiated how adding new signage-thereby creating more visual confusion-is supposed to help? With all these visual detractions, you have done nothing but keep drivers from paying attention to cars/students/bikers along the road. Trying to read the signage and pay attention traffic warning devices has the same net effect as texting while driving: distracting from paying attention to the road. What genius came up with this plan? What textbook proposes a plan that supposedly creates safer driving conditions by maximum distraction of drivers? Do I read signs or pay attention to student bikers/walkers/on a mile long parking lot with bumper to bumper cars during peak traffic hours? I am truly wondering how anyone can call this a “CALMER DRIVING CONDITION”, one of the ostensible goals for this million dollar redesign. Ms. Boyd, your note states that you evaluate concerns as they are brought to your attention. Surely, the very specific and very serious concerns we have brought to your attention merit a better, more robust and more respectful response/action plan from City Staff than adding more signage and painting the median noses red. Thank you for your attention to these matters. Regards, Eva Gal On Aug 20, 2019, at 1:09 PM, Boyd, Holly <Holly.Boyd@CityofPaloAlto.org> wrote: Ms. Gal,  The City Manager, Ed Shikada, asked me to respond to your message  on his behalf. Thank you for reaching out to us about the concerns you  noticed regarding the improvements along Arastradero Road. The road  improvements along Arastradero Road are part of a greater effort to  improve 2.3 miles of the Charleston‐Arastradero Corridor by  moderating vehicle speeds and creating calmer travel conditions for  drivers, cyclists, and pedestrians. Charleston‐Arastradero is classified  as a residential arterial which means it has lower speeds than  commercial arterial streets. However, given the change involved, we  have installed additional temporary traffic warning devices to reinforce  lower speeds in addition to the permanent medians that limit turns.  The medians work in conjunction with the project’s other design  elements to ensure smoother traffic flow, lower speeds, and less  abrupt lane changes, dangerous turns, and other unsafe driving  maneuvers such as illegal U‐turns.  Staff from Public Works and the  Office of Transportation observed the school commute along the  corridor during the first days of school last week and is reviewing  additional improvement opportunities for signage and striping,  including the painting of the median noses to make them more visible.  While most of the hardscape work is completed, there is still more  work to be done.  Irrigation installation is happening now, with  landscaping and tree planting to follow.  5 Meanwhile, work on the Palo Alto‐Los Altos bike path will happen later  this fall.  Upgraded vehicle detection and traffic signal synchronization  along the corridor to smoothen traffic flow will continue to be  optimized over the next several months.  The construction project is  expected to be completed in November, with the last segment (Phase  3) to be bid later this fall.  We value your feedback. We continue to evaluate concerns as they are  brought to our attention. Please let us know if you have additional  questions or observations.     Regards,                             From: Eva Gal <evahgal@gmail.com>   Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2019 9:43 AM  To: Council, City <city.council@cityofpaloalto.org>  Cc: Reply to group <Greenacres2@yahoogroups.com>  Subject: Nightmare on Arastradero corridor     CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.  Members of the City Council of Palo Alto:     I have read the many notes written about the disastrous Charleston/Arastradero corridor, and I agree with the details and sentiments expressed in them.      We were away from home for almost five weeks this summer. As we were driving home last week, I thought I was prepared for the worst, but of course I was wrong. Driving on Charleston and then Arastradero, I had a sense of what it must be like to to be hallucinating-roads curving in odd directions, abutments sticking out in unexpected places, roads so narrow that an SUV touches both sides of the markings, insufficient turning radius for cars due to unnecessary bump-outs, green boxes, green lines, jagged lines, red markings, white stripes, etc. One does wonder about the state of mind of City Council who directed these changes, and City Staff, who interpreted and implemented these directions in a truly nightmarish way. As a person who gets sick on <image001.jpg>       Holly Boyd, P.E.  Assistant Director of Public Works     Engineering Services    650.329.2612     6 roller coasters, and stays away from Ferris wheels and bumper cars for the same reason, Arastradero and Charleston feels equally nauseating and dangerous-yet unfortunately unavoidable. Shame on you City Council and City Staff for wasting millions of dollars on a project that has caused so much grief for residents and created possibly the most unsafe corridor in Palo Alto or any area in the Bay Area.      On a different note, this Morning, I went to observe the traffic at 7:45 am at the corner of Donald and Arastradero.... Here are some thoughts and observations:     Good News:  - No one got hurt this morning.  - On the whole, the students and the crossing guard did a good job observing the traffic rules.     Bad news:  -There is a significant increase in traffic on side streets as a consequence of traffic on Arastradero. Thank you, Council Member Kniss !!!!!  -As the students stack on bikes in the green slime box waiting to cross Arastradero, and as the students stack on bikes on the green stripes on Arastradero waiting to either cross to Fletcher or to go to Gunn, there is no space for cars to make a right turn to Donald even at the slowest speed-without jutting into the bike box or the waiting students. What. A. Nightmare!!! We warned staff about this, to no avail.  -With all the so called planning that has gone into this realignment, the City has not bothered to activate/place a "no turn on red when students are present” sign at the four corners.  (There is one well hidden at one corner, which is ignored by all) Safety concerns, City Staff??????  -The four corners at Donald/Arastradero and Terman Drive/Arastradero are still not painted red. Therefore, parents are stopping and dropping kids off at the corners; parking at the corner (I almost hit a car as as I turned right on to Donald from Arastradero going West)-all legally. Safety concerns, City Staff????  -The traffic inside Fletcher is equally problematic: cars are going in four different patterns, no turning areas for cars to drive by, and Bowman pre-school drop-off has not even started!  -Parents making u-turns on Donald right into oncoming walkers, parked cars, double yellow lines, bicycling kids, etc. is a major hazard- no police presence at all to help with traffic!!!!     These are but a few observations from one morning. City Council and Staff, you have managed to endanger lives and create a traffic snarl that benefits no one. I do not know what base you are catering to or whose interests you are accommodating. It is certainly not the residents of Green Acres ll.     Eva Gal  Green Acres ll         -------- Original message --------  From: "'A..J.' ajlumsdaine@gmail.com [greenacres2]" <greenacres2-noreply@yahoogroups.com>   Date: 8/14/19 3:38 PM (GMT+08:00)   To: Betty Thana <bthana@att.net>   7 Cc: Ree Dufresne <ree_duff@comcast.net>, Sheryl Keller <kellersheryl@gmail.com>, "Sheryl Keller kellersheryl@gmail.com[greenacres2]" <greenacres2-noreply@yahoogroups.com>, Ron Baker <bakerra@pacbell.net>, Greenacres2 <greenacres2@yahoogroups.com>   Subject: Re: [GA2] Fwd: Congratulations Lunkheads, the City Will Now Get Sued Over the Corridor Project         The most serious is the separated bike lane which is basically designed to kill someone. Separating bike and car traffic is not a bad idea, but there needs to be integrated signaling so the bikes don’t just think they have the right of way. As it is, the cars have to know about this separated lane in order to not turn right in front of bikes on that separated lane, otherwise called a right hook, the most common car-bike accident. The new streetscape is so confusing and unorthodox, and set up to be such an obstacle course, I have noticed that I have to spend so much attention on the street scape it’s making it impossible to safely keep an eye on pedestrians and especially bicyclists (especially erratic bicyclists, which unfortunately, is just par for the course with middle schoolers).    The crazy thing is that I spent a lot of effort trying to explain to the City how the previous jut-out curb was an accident waiting to happen, and so it seems like they went back to the drawing board to make absolutely certain they kill someone. Absolutely crazy.    Anne      On Aug 13, 2019, at 10:31 PM, Betty Thana bthana@att.net [greenacres2] <greenacres2- noreply@yahoogroups.com> wrote:    Hi Neighbors,  I was returning home tonight, around 7:15 PM, turning onto Arastradero from El Camino, then turning right onto Coulombe, and I noticed how dangerous the newly constructed cement barriers are on Arastradero, for that 0.3 miles. It is as if someone has constructed an obstacle course for us:    1) midway on Arastradero, between El Camino and Columbe, the new cement barriers directly cut off the right lane, by being constructed straight across the road, ie perpendicular to the curb, and stretching out one lane’s length, directly into the lane where people are driving their cars.    I was only alerted to its existence, because there were a few orange flags on top of the cement barrier, otherwise, I probably would have driven my car 8 straight into the concrete barriers, that is directly in front crossing my lane.     This was in the day light, and accidents may happen after dark, when the drivers who are not familiar with this road, and not anticipating a concrete barrier crossing their entire lane, would crash into the concrete barrier, causing severe injuries to passengers and kids.    2) to make the right turn into Coulombe, there are the concrete barriers butting out as a big triangle, way into the middle of the road, and if one is not familiar with this road, it may cause an accident,     It is a bit ironic that here we are, living in the heart of the Silicon Valley, supposedly full of the smartest people on earth, making all these innovations, and we have in our own neighborhood these concrete barriers that do seem in need some help from some smarter road safety designers and legislators..    Regards,  Betty  On Aug 10, 2019, at 1:04 PM, ree_duff@comcast.net [greenacres2] <greenacres2-noreply@yahoogroups.com> wrote:      Before I send this to City Council, do I have my facts straight & does it make sense to the rest of you? Ree Dufresne    Members of the City Council of Palo Alto  Before Those DANGEROUS ABUTMENTS were put in permanently, I along with other Intelligent residents of Palo Alto, objected to having them put in. It was obvious to me that they pmwould do more harm than good!  As Staff apparently carries more weight in how my Tax dollars are spent, our opinions opposing these structural monstrosities abutting out of the normal lane markers, etc. were ignored.   I would ask the Council to weigh the collateral damage & risks to Automobiles, Bikers & Pedestrians, from “sideswiping” or bouncing off of these blocks of Concrete.  Although I was aware of the danger they posed. I didn’t fully appreciate how easily a driver could miss allowing for that concrete, as it isn’t a normal lane width.  9 I wasn’t prepared for the damage caused to the front left wheel well, etc. on the side of my car when I bounced off of one. Is the City of Palo Alto going to pay for the damages to cars that bounce off of these abutments?  Why is it that STAFF carries more weight with a Computer generated model for altering our streets, than those of us who are in our cars and driving these roads every day?Ree Dufresne            On August 7, 2019 at 9:18 PM "Sheryl Keller kellersheryl@gmail.com [greenacres2]" <greenacres2-noreply@yahoogroups.com> wrote:     Agree with Ron Baker. Where is the city employee who designed this mess. Let's find him and have him drive on our "improved" corridor at 8AM and at 5PM. Same with the city council members who approved this. Let them drive this stretch for a week. See what happens.  On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 8:58 PM Ron Baker bakerra@pacbell.net [greenacres2] < greenacres2-noreply@yahoogroups.com> wrote:         Forwarding because they bounced my new email address. See my message below..    From: Ron Baker <rabaker.pa@gmail.com>  Subject: Congratulations Lunkheads, the City Will Now Get Sued Over the Corridor Project  Date: August 7, 2019 at 8:48:03 PM PDT  To: city.council@cityofpaloalto.org  Cc: Greenacres2 <greenacres2@yahoogroups.com>, webmaster@pal oaltoonline.com    I went to a council session, my wife and I went to department meetings or hearings, my neighbors went to planning meetings, I talked to and emailed council and staff on the absolute stupidity of the “traffic calming” project on Charleston Arastradero 10 corridor. ABSOLUTELY NOBODY WAS LISTENING. Let me tell you, there was NO material problem that a few citations/police speed patrols and better use of rapid transit funds wouldn’t solve. Traffic accidents were largely due to Gunn kids reading their phones and rear ending people in stop and go traffic at rush hour. I know, as my home fronts Arastradero,and I work from home most days.    Anyway, today TWO cars just ran into those stupid new traffic calming forms today, just in the stretch of Arastradero between Coulombe and Cherry Oaks.     This was the first day without the orange warning blocks. I only saw what happened in one of these “accidents", fortunately the second driver, whose car will have to be extracted from the form, was okay, though her expensive car may need some work.. The prior accident reportedly involved a double blowout when the vehicle hit the form. My neighbors on and near Arastradero, some of whom also tried to complain, were out in force to greet the fire truck that responded, and all agreed this was totally predictable, so from a legal standpoint, that will be a problem for Palo Alto.. As one firefighter said, wait til the schools are in session, and rush hour traffic has gone to zero. I’m guessing that residents now ! take longer getting to the local freeways then actually traveling on them.  Meanwhile, wait til a bicyclist who doesn’t understand the design runs into a form. This is just pathetically stupid.     The city is going to get sued for this project, and the the hazards it presents. This city is run by a part time council that leaves decisions in the hands of staff who couldn’t figure out best practices if their lives depended on it, but fortunately for them, they collect great pensions, no matter how bad their recommendations. Clearly, the incentives here are all wrong. At least half the council is funded by developers, or depend on incomes in real estate or property development, the other half move on to higher office with the support of the public employee unions. Few members of the council are willing to challenge the reports and proposals prepared by the bureaucrats, or challenge the assumptions on which they are based..     The council and departments run interminable meetings where many of the people with something real to say have to leave because the council is running way too far behind. When the citizens on rare occasions rebel, as with the original Maybell housing project, council members seem to have no clue because they almost never go door to door to canvas residents in the affected area, and the bureaucrats are even less inclined to do that. The process here is a total failure.   1 Brettle, Jessica From:Ann Protter <ann.protter@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, October 22, 2019 3:46 PM To:Kamhi, Philip; Council, City Cc:Chris Robell Subject:Old Palo Alto RPP - Follow Up CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.    Dear City Council Members and Mr Kamhi,    I spoke at last night's meeting regarding the RPP for Old Palo Alto.  I requested that we be able to park in front of our  own homes without having to pay for it (like most of the city does).      While I am appreciative that the city council passed the RPP request, I was offended by the seemingly offhand remark  made by Mr DeBois in which he said, basically, that we could use our driveways and that he wasn't bothered by our  having to pay for permits.   And that no council member except the amazing Ms Kou would allow us even a single permit  for free.    May I remind the city council that this Old Palo Alto parking problem has been created by the city:     ‐ By allowing businesses to escape their responsibility to provide adequate parking for their employees.     ‐ By increasing the cost of a business parking permit so much that California Ave employees would rather park in our  neighborhood and walk.     ‐ By ignoring the fact that for decades the Caltrain parking lot has been mostly empty (if the city is renting out 40 spots,  and I still counted over 30 free spots, then it is basically empty), because the price to park at $5/day is clearly more than  most people can afford.    We have owned our house for 30 years, this parking problem has only existed for about five years.       My father, Andy Doty, the long‐time Stanford Director of Community Relations, taught me that if you move to a busy  street you can't expect the city to make it less busy.   I accept that, but in this case the city has made our street much  busier and yet will offer us not a single pass to park in front of our own home.      Because of the city's lack of planning, we will be saddled with the following inconveniences:     ‐ We will now have meter maids on our streets, adding more traffic and pollution.     ‐ We will have to carefully watch the clock for any visitor that we think will be here less than 2 hours.     ‐ We will have to track and retrieve hangtags we offer to tradespeople or visitors who stay longer than 2 hours.    And now we also have to pay for the privilege of parking in front of our own homes.  Yes, I already use my driveway, Mr  Bubois.  But you might have noticed that several streets in our area have parking on only one side.  And many lots are  narrow with a single driveway.   There is a need in this community to park on the street.        2 I just don't understand why we should have to pay for a problem the city created.  Aren't meter‐maids, tracking rotating  hangtags, and tickets for exceeding the 2 hour limits punishment enough?    I truly hope the city decides in the next year that residents should be allowed one free permit per household, at a  minimum.      Sincerely,  Ann Protter    1 Brettle, Jessica From:John Shepardson <john@shepardsonlaw.com> Sent:Monday, October 21, 2019 7:25 PM To:Steven Leonardis; Marcia Jensen; bspector; Marico Sayoc; Rob Rennie; Laurel Prevetti; Robert Schultz; senator Beall; Wasserman Mike; liccardo sam; mcappello@saratoga.ca.us; Howard Miller; mlbernald@saratoga.ca.us; yzhao@saratoga.ca.us; Carl Guardino; district1@co.monterey.ca.us; district3@co.monterey.ca.us; district2@co.monterey.ca.us; senator.moorlach@senate.ca.gov; MayorSteinberg@cityofsacramento.org; mayor.garcetti@lacity.org; Mayor@bakersfieldcity.us; scheduling@kamalaharris.org; Martine Watkins; Sandy Brown; Sinks, Rod; Cynthia Mathews; Donna Meyers; Drew Glover; Justin Cummings; citycouncil@cupertino.org; District1@sanjoseca.gov; District2 @sanjoseca.gov; District3@sanjoseca.gov; District4@sanjoseca.gov; District5@sanjoseca.gov; district6@sanjoseca.gov; District7@sanjoseca.gov; district8@sanjoseca.gov; District9@sanjoseca.gov; District10@sanjoseca.gov; citycouncil@mountainview.gov; Council, City; lleeeng@losaltosca.gov; council@losaltosca.gov; citycouncil@cityofsanmateo.org; Longdon.Breed@sfgov.org; Sandra.Fewer@sfgov.org; Aaron.Peskin@sfgov.org; officeofthemayor@oaklandnet.com; atlarge@oaklandca.gov; district2@oaklandca.gov; Pamela Price; District6@oaklandca.gov; Ngallo@oaklandca.gov Subject:President Trump Swore an Oath to Uphold Constitution and now Calls Part of it 'phony' CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.  Leaders:    The POTUS seems to have little, if any, regard for preserving, protecting, or defending the emoluments clause in the U.S. Constitution. A constitutional  amendment is required to change the constitution. Therefore, whether he likes it or not, the POTUS must uphold the clause. He seems intent on not  enforcing it. Is this another abuse of government power to consider in the impeachment inquiry? At a minimum, it’s another important data point indicating   that he is unfit and incompetent to serve as POTUS.    Copy and paste from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oath_of_office_of_the_President_of_the_United_States    Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:—"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and  2 defend the Constitution of the United  States."[2] (emphasis added)     Copy and paste from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Title_of_Nobility _Clause  Text[edit] No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.[4]   Copy and paste from https://www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/tr ump-and-foreign-emoluments-clause/  RULE OF LAW   Blumenthal, et al. v. Trump Holding President Trump accountable for his violations of the Foreign Emoluments Clause. In Brief 3 The Foreign Emoluments Clause of the Constitution prohibits the President from accepting any benefits from foreign states unless he first obtains the consent of Congress. President Trump has never sought or received such consent.     The Founders adopted the Foreign Emoluments Clause because they believed America would be harmed if federal officeholders, including the President, made policy decisions based on their own self‐interest rather than the national interest.     There is nothing members of Congress can do to redress this constitutional violation so long as the President is accepting foreign government benefits without first obtaining congressional consent. That’s why the courts must enforce the Constitution.   Copy and paste from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/tru mp-impeachment-inquiry-live- updates/2019/10/21/c6630a30-f3e9-11e9- 8cf0-4cc99f74d127_story.html    1 p.m.: Trump decries ‘this phony emoluments clause’ Trump decried “this phony emoluments clause” Monday as he continued to defend his now- abandoned decision to host next year’s international Group of Seven summit at a private Miami golf club he owns. Speaking to reporters who were allowed to sit in on his Cabinet meeting, Trump suggested that he was being held to a different standard than other presidents, including some who were also wealthy. “Other presidents, if you look, other presidents were wealthy, not huge wealth,” he said. “George Washington was actually considered a very, very rich man at the time. But they ran their businesses. George Washington, they say had two desks. He had a presidential desk and a business desk.” At that point, Trump complained about “you people with this phony emoluments clause.” (emphasis added)  Under the emoluments clause of the Constitution, presidents are not permitted to use the office to enrich themselves. Trump reversed course on holding the G-7 at the Trump National Doral Miami after he was told by conservative allies that Republicans were struggling to defend him on multiple fronts. Democrats had considered adding the alleged emoluments violation to the articles of impeachment they are preparing.   4   JS          John Shepardson Attorney at Law john@shepardsonlaw.com Office 408 395 3701       1 Brettle, Jessica From:Joe Hirsch <jihirschpa@earthlink.net> Sent:Thursday, October 17, 2019 8:20 AM To:Council, City Subject:PTC Commissioner Michael Alcheck CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.  Dear Council members: Fred Balin has previously submitted to you, and later commented on, a comprehensive investigation undertaken by him detailing the failure of Planning and Transportation Commission Commissioner Michael Alcheck to recuse himself on multiple occasions because of glaring conflicts of interest regarding Municipal Code sections that affected two residential properties in which he had a significant ownership interest and that came before him while he was on the Commission. I have read that report. As a former Planning Commissioner and Chair of the Commission, I am appalled at the personal influence that Mr. Alcheck had, and was permitted to have, on these matters that affected him and his sister financially. The facts set forth in Mr. Balin’s report of his investigation should be promptly verified by one or more independent persons appointed by the Council. But, assuming those facts are true, as they appear to be, it is hard to believe that there can be any outcome other than Mr. Alcheck being asked to, or being required to, resign his seat on the Commission for his egregious ethical failures. Mr. Alcheck not only failed to recuse himself, but remained on the dais and pressed discussions to his economic advantage, and City staff acceded to him on multiple occasions. One particular example (from many in Mr. Balin’s report) was in 2015 when he stopped any changes to the Contextual Garage Placement Code section. It returned to the Commission in 2017 along with proposed changes to carport and garage definitions, when Mr. Alcheck remained on the dais as his sister addressed the Commission objecting to the changes and proposed definitions. Neither of them disclosed their close family relationship or their common interest in one of the two properties affected by the Code revisions or interpretations during her presentation. 2 His failure to recuse himself and publicly disclose his personal interest in the two properties precluded a proper review of the Code revisions that could have prevented, if properly handled, what Mr. Alcheck and his sister were doing on, or planning on doing to, the two properties they owned that were directly affected by those proposed Code revisions, which they subsequently were allowed to do. In the long run, the matters were mishandled in a way that increased the value of each of those properties to Mr. Alcheck’s and his sister’s benefit. Mr. Balin’s report provides more than ample evidence that Mr. Alcheck should be removed from the PTC and I urge you to take whatever steps are needed to promptly achieve that result. Failure to do so would erode the confidence residents must have about the ethical conduct that City staff, City Councils and its appointed officials must adhere to. You should not simply disregard what Mr. Alcheck has done – as detailed in Mr. Balin’s comprehensive report. Prompt action by you on this is urgency requested. Joe Hirsch Georgia Avenue Palo Alto 1 Brettle, Jessica From:Nadia Naik <nadianaik@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, October 18, 2019 1:18 PM To:opana_news; PAN; Gaines, Chantal; Council, City; Kamhi, Philip; Shikada, Ed Subject:Save the Date: Updates on Train/Road Separations (Connecting Palo Alto) - New Ideas welcome! CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.  Dear Neighbors,     There are important meetings coming up. Please help spread the word! Forward this email!    The following is an update on the Connecting Palo Alto program which seeks to separate the trains from the roads (grade separations). More information is available at the NEW website: connectingpaloalto.com. Options currently being considered by the City Council are:     Churchill Closure – under development; resources to-date are:   Bike / Ped Option 1   Bike / Ped Option 2   Traffic Study (Note: expected to impact Embarcadero Road)  Viaduct in the Vicinity of Churchill   Animation  South Palo Alto Tunnel – Passenger and Freight   Animation  South Palo Alto Tunnel with At-Grade Freight   Animation  Meadow-Charleston Trench   Rendering   Profile (143MB)   Animation  Meadow-Charleston Viaduct   Rendering   Profile (205MB)   Animation  Meadow-Charleston Hybrid   Rendering   Profile (306MB)   Animation    2 Note: Palo Alto Avenue is being studied through a separate coordinated area plan study due to its proximity to Downtown and the University Avenue Station.  Meetings    October 28th, 2019 - City Council Meeting - City Hall – 5pm. See agenda for detailed start times    The City Council recently voted to formalize the Expanded Community Advisory Panel (XCAP) and tasked them with developing recommendations for separating the road from the train (grade separation) at Churchill Ave, Meadow and Charleston and present their findings by April 30, 2020.     The XCAP is tentatively scheduled to provide a brief update and the City Staff is expected to report on their Rail Communication and Community Engagement efforts. Current agenda available here.    Wed, Oct. 30th, 2019 - XCAP Meeting - 4-6pm Community Room, City Hall   Check back here for agenda: https://connectingpaloalto.com/presentations-and-reports/    The XCAP has been authorized by City Council to consider if there are new, feasible alternatives for the grade crossings. At this meeting, XCAP will consider any such new ideas and formalize their future meeting schedule. The XCAP doesn't have a single email address, but emails for each member are available here. Please submit ideas ASAP!    Thurs, Nov 7, 2019 - Citywide Community Meeting - 6:00 pm - 8:00 pm Mitchell Park Community Center, El Palo Alto Room, 3700 Middlefield Rd  The City of Palo Alto staff is hosting this community meeting to review the grade separation alternatives currently under consideration, including details about the Churchill viaduct, Churchill Closure with mitigations, and the South Palo Alto Tunnel options. The meeting will follow a format similar to previous community meetings - including break-out sessions, exhibits and experts on hand to answer community questions.    Thanks for staying engaged on this long, but important process!    Nadia Naik   Chair, Expanded Community Advisory Panel (XCAP)              1 Brettle, Jessica From:Geri <geri@thegrid.net> Sent:Sunday, October 20, 2019 7:52 PM To:Council, City Cc:Peter Drekmeier; klnordman54@gmail.com Subject:Sketch of 2005 of Palo Alto Council CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on  links.  ________________________________      Dear city leaders     This was my live sketch  in 2005 of your group IN THE CHAMBERS.     I’m still working on   TRAFFIC safety,  but it was very good then.    Folks need parking.      The city took AWAY my parking. NOT easy.    2   Geri McGilvray     EVERYDAY SAFETY AND WALKABILITY  Sent from my iPhone  1 Brettle, Jessica From:Barry Hart <hartb88@yahoo.com> Sent:Monday, October 21, 2019 2:45 PM To:supervisor.simitian@bos.sccgov.org; Council, City Subject:Stanford expansion - understand the Full impact and then get a full comprehensive mitigation plan from Stanford - all negotiated in public CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.  Dear Supervisor Simitian - It is important that we have a full environmental impact understanding of the Stanford expansion before negotiating its mitigation. The county needs to insist on a complete and comprehensive mitigation plan from Stanford and the process should be negotiated in public Barry Hart Palo Alto Ave Palo Alto, CA 1 Brettle, Jessica From:geetha srikantan <gsrikantan@yahoo.com> Sent:Tuesday, October 22, 2019 8:38 AM To:Council, City; supervisor.simitian@bos.sccgov.org Cc:geetha srikantan Subject:Stanford GUP CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.  Dear Palo Alto City and County Representatives, As a long-time resident of Downtown Palo Alto, I have come to appreciate the need for checks and balances that are part of the City of Palo Alto's process for building, transportation and other changes in the city and the open review and feedback process. Very often city and county officials have little or no understanding of issues affecting residents and it is tremendously valuable to have the voice of the community be heard and the concerns addressed, in any future/new development in the city or county. I also appreciate Stanford University as a place of learning and all the contributions to many areas that benefit the bay area, state, country and the planet. I believe the growth of their campus and impact of it on surrounding areas must be considered carefully, and not rushed into - and fail to see how the current Stanford GUP, under discussion, would achieve it. I am not in favor of closed-door review and decision-making for Stanford GUP. It is essential to have an open process to review Stanford's application for new construction and buildings with a view to mitigating impact on neighborhoods. Further, the impact of any new development should be evaluated not just at the time of approval of a project, it should also be reviewed over time, to study the eventual impact, to fully understand dynamic and real- life environments. Negative impact needs to be mitigated as and when it occurs - therefore having any sort of blanket approval over a decade or longer to pursue new constructions is a poorly construed approach to addressing the needs of Stanford and the community. Thank you, Sincerely, Dr Geetha Srikantan 1 Brettle, Jessica From:Ken Joye <kmjoye@gmail.com> Sent:Monday, October 21, 2019 5:13 PM To:Council, City Subject:subsidized parking CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.  I read in a Daily Post article today that adding the Old Palo Alto neighborhood to the RPP program will cost  approximately $75,500 but that expected revenue from permit sales is $14,000 or less.    Why should the neighborhoods not benefiting from RPP pay for this?    I am sympathetic to those who face parking pressure in their neighborhoods, to a degree (I happen to live on a block  with five single family homes, three multi‐family buildings and one neighborhood‐based business, adjacent to a number  of large multi‐family complexes‐‐parking on my block is always a challenge).    I would suggest that RPP should be revenue‐neutral, so that General Fund expenditures can benefit *all* of us.  I note  that none of the RPP neighborhoods are on the "south" side of Oregon Expwy‐‐is that generally acknowledged?    Please make it so that people benefiting from a parking permit pay the full cost.    thanks for considering this input,  Ken Joye  Ventura neighborhood    1 Brettle, Jessica From:Mark Cox <markdarrellcox@icloud.com> Sent:Sunday, October 20, 2019 6:04 PM To:jd@howardstern.com Subject:The Difference (i) CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on  links.  ________________________________    Herod Antipas ((like Antipasto isn't it? Except he got No "To." Not exactly. Antipater is Antipastros in Greek.)) His Capital  was Tiberius the Future Home of the Masorets along the Western Shore of the Galilee. Wait. There is also another  Antipater who is the Elder Son. Who's the Idiot in charge of branding by the Herod Family? Which Herod died in the  Book of Acts? Antipas dies in Exile in Spain? Do we know which Herod this was? The Murky "Difference" is Pontus Pilate  becomes Saul becomes Paul and "Someone Else" is called Apollo ((Wearing Apparel)). Yet Herod "Which One" dies in the  Book of Acts. What's the Difference? Was Herod handling the "Iscariot Operation" for Tiberius?    Now a Word from our Sponsors. Let it Be ABC, Simple. When you find yourself in Times of Trouble ; 2 + 2 = 4 ; 2 x 2 = 4 ;  What's the Difference? How Many Twos do you See? Okay. There is an Underscored Emphasis on Twos. Now given we  have within our "ABCS" the Four Main Uncials by "Who was that guy Alex Text Type" "Magic Alex" borrowed from the  Beatles (( Son of Gun : Magic was Greek )) then where is the Sixtine Text in our Confabulation of these Two Songs "Let it  Be" and "ABC"? Tick tick tick. Times Up. Lets look at Title Number One. The First Number One Song in the Month of  Nisan ((Near Nisan)) in 1970 for Two Weeks on Billboard (( Can you BI LLBOARD—What is llboard? )) is "Let it Be." That's  a Declaration. Let E = MC(Squared). iPadMegaOS has No Numeric Subscript. Truckers don't need to understand Einstein  when Delivering Household Opium between a Daisy Chain of Safe Houses? Buy the Property, Set Up Shop, Move the  Product, Sell the House. Stop by the Local Church. Put the Money in the Mouth of a Priest. Okay Now. Does everyone  have their Seatbelt On? We're going to Camp Abduction to Watch Kidnapped Celebrities make Little Dime Bags of  Heroin. It's Like going to Disneyland in the Underworld. "Where were we?" "I don't know. You were blind folded. Slight  Detour." If X = MC 2 "Boss I can't get that 2 to Shrink and Levirate." ... Musta IT = Be? Let it , Letit , Le Tit , Be. Maybe Two  Titles. Be as "B" as in "Bet" "I'll bet you can't guess the answer." The Value of IT must be Two. What Year was this for the  Two Songs : the White Band followed by the Black Band. The Beatles followed by the Jacksons. "I hope all those guys  were circumcised." The Septuagint Year of the Twentieth Century under the BCAD Gregorian Calendar 1970 hence the  Tenuous Answer is "or else could be" is that the Sixtine Text of 1587 is the Second while the Complutensian Polygot is  the First and these together are the "Two" pointed to by the First Song "Let it Be"  and the Four Main Uncials ABCS(Alef)  —> {Alef : Alexandrine Text Type Only} are the "Four" pointed to by the Second Song "ABC" ((And This is Supposed to Be  Simple.)). The Document Count is Standing at Six. The Main Uncial Count is Standing at Four. The Pyramid by Imhotep  was Six Steps on Four Sides and the Pharaoh buried could have been a Pointer to the Flock of His People faithfully  awaiting for the Resurrection. The Complutensian Polygot is Printed in 1514 for the Gospels and 1517 for the  Remainder. The Year 1517 is Septuagint Years before the Year 1587. The Sixtine Text of 1587 is printed as 1586 yet the  Number 1586 is crossed Out by Hand and the Year 1587 is Written by Hand. Would this point to a level of veracity  whereby the Publisher was willing to Mar Every Copy to Disfigure Every Copy because Truth trumps Beauty?  1 Brettle, Jessica From:Mark Cox <markdarrellcox@icloud.com> Sent:Sunday, October 20, 2019 5:46 PM To:jd@howardstern.com Subject:The Difference CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on  links.  ________________________________    Herod Antipas ((like Antipasto isn't it? Except he got No "To." Not exactly. Antipater is Antipastros in Greek.)) His Capital  was Tiberius the Future Home of the Masorets along the Western Shore of the Galilee. Wait. There is also another  Antipater who is the Elder Son. Who's the Idiot in charge of branding by the Herod Family? Which Herod died in the  Book of Acts? Antipas dies in Exile in Spain? Do we know which Herod this was? The Murky "Difference" is Pontus Pilate  becomes Saul becomes Paul and "Someone Else" is called Apollo ((Wearing Apparel)). Yet Herod "Which One" dies in the  Book of Acts. What's the Difference? Was Herod handling the "Iscariot Operation" for Tiberius?    Now a Word from our Sponsors. Let it Be ABC, Simple. When you find yourself in Times of Trouble ; 2 + 2 = 4 ; 2 x 2 = 4 ;  What's the Difference? How Many Twos do you See? Okay. There is an Underscored Emphasis on Twos. Now given we  within our ABCS the Four Main Uncials by Who was that guy Alex Text Type (( Son of Gun : He was Greek )) then where is  the Sixtine Text in our Confabulation? Tick tick tick. Times Up. Lets look at Title Number One. The First Number One Song  in the Month of Nisan ((Near Nisan)) in 1970 for Two Weeks on Billboard (( Can you BI LLBOARD—What is llboard? )) is  "Let it Be." That's a Declaration. Let E = MC(Squared). iPadMegaOS has No Numeric Subscript. Truckers don't need to  understand Einstein when Delivering Household Opium between a Daisy Chain of Safe Houses? Buy the Property, Set Up  Shop, Move the Product, Sell the House. Stop by the Local Church. Put the Money in the Mouth of a Priest. Okay Now.  Does everyone have their Seatbelt On? We're going to Camp Abduction to Watch Kidnapped Celebrities make Little  Dime Bags of Heroin. It's Like going to Disneyland in the Underworld. "Where were we?" "I don't know. You were blind  folded. Slight Detour." If X = MC 2 "Boss I can't get that 2 to Shrink and Levirate." ... Musta IT = Be? Let it , Letit , Le Tit ,  Be. Maybe Two Titles. Be as "B" as in "Bet" "I'll bet you can't guess the answer." The Value of IT must be Two. What Year  was this for the Two Songs : the White Band followed by the Black Band. The Beatles followed by the Jacksons. "I hope  all those guys were circumcised." The Septuagint Year of the Twentieth Century under the BCAD Gregorian Calendar  1970 hence the Tenuous Answer is "or else could be" is that the Sixtine Text of 1587 is the Second while the  Complutensian Polygot is the First and these together are the "Two" pointed to by the First Song "Let it Be"  and the  Four Main Uncials ABCS(Alef) —> {Alef : Alexandrine Text Type Only} are the "Four" pointed to by the Second Song  "ABC" ((And This is Supposed to Be Simple.)). The Document Count is Standing at Six. The Main Uncial Count is Standing  at Four. The Pyramid by Imhotep was Six Steps on Four Sides and the Pharaoh buried could have been a Pointer to the  Flock of His People faithfully awaiting for the Resurrection. The Complutensian Polygot is Printed in 1514 for the Gospels  and 1517 for the Remainder. The Year 1517 is Septuagint Years before the Year 1587. The Sixtine Text of 1587 is printed  as 1586 yet the Number 1586 is crossed Out by Hand and the Year 1587 is Written by Hand. Would this point to a level  of veracity whereby the Publisher was willing to Mar Every Copy to Disfigure Every Copy because Truth trumps Beauty?  1 Brettle, Jessica From:Mark Cox <markdarrellcox@icloud.com> Sent:Monday, October 21, 2019 11:47 PM To:jd@howardstern.com Subject:The Lord said to My Lord CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on  links.  ________________________________    The Lord said to My Lord, Sit at My Right Hand, Till I make thine Enemies thy Footstool.    Hebrew Abjads function as Left Side Profile Schematics of Pronunciation. Hence Yod Heh Waw Heh maps Yod (י) the First  Character to the LEFT Hand and the First Heh (ה) the Second Character to the LEFT Breast and Waw (ו) the Third  Character to the STERNUM and the Second Heh (ה) the Fourth Character to the RIGHT Breast. And. That's it. No Right  Hand is Visibly depicted as an Abjad mapped to the Right Hand. Except. We're forgetting that in ΚΥΡΙΟΣ ΘΕΟΣ in Hebrew  as ( הוהי יהולאם ) at the Right Hand of the Tetragrammaton is Where ΘΕΟΣ Elohim (םיהולא) is Found. Hence the Unaltered  Hebrew Scripture functions as Elohim as God as ΘΕΟΣ until ... And then what happens? Well either way if we are not in  the Book as the Book was Sent Down then What Happens? Why is it LEFT , LEFT, CENTER, RIGHT? ((Mapped))  Perspective.  1 Brettle, Jessica From:Geri <geri@thegrid.net> Sent:Friday, October 18, 2019 5:22 PM To:Council, City Cc:mlbex100@gmail.com; Dorian Manke Subject:TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on  links.  ________________________________  Dear city leaders,    SHAMEFUL the way Palo Alto police allow today’s speeding 30 miles OVER the speed limit on Middlefield!  SATURDAYS ARE THE WORST.  I thought when we got the Menlo police chief here in Palo Alto, that we would finally get some speed and red light  enforcement on our arterial.  But, NO, not at all.  Zip.  Zero.  Three crashes in two weeks at Moreno where we have needed a signal for ten years now!  Man hurt:  girl down on bike. Our electromic meter Knocked down and removed.. drivers coming into oncoming traffic  all the time to pass  ANARCHY for nine  be years here now and over 1, 000 accidents in my town Every year.  It’s so UN necessary to speed within our small city.  Geri McGilvray,  EVERYDAY SAFETY AND WALKABILITY  {REDACTED}  Palo Alto,  California, 94301  Sent from my iPhone