Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout20191216plCC 701-32 DOCUMENTS IN THIS PACKET INCLUDE: LETTERS FROM CITIZENS TO THE MAYOR OR CITY COUNCIL RESPONSES FROM STAFF TO LETTERS FROM CITIZENS ITEMS FROM MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS ITEMS FROM OTHER COMMITTEES AND AGENCIES ITEMS FROM CITY, COUNTY, STATE, AND REGIONAL AGENCIES Prepared for: 12/16/2019 Document dates: 11/27/2019 – 12/4/2019 Set 1 Note: Documents for every category may not have been received for packet reproduction in a given week. 1 Brettle, Jessica From:Ann Protter <ann.protter@gmail.com> Sent:Wednesday, November 27, 2019 2:49 PM To:Council, City; O'Kane, Kristen Subject:Thanks re Carol & Rinconada Masters CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.    Dear City Council Members and Ms O'Kane,    I wanted to thank all of you for helping to keep Carol McPherson as the Rinconada Master's coach for the entire year.    My son now swims beautifully, thanks to Carol.  We are very grateful.       And what a nice bonus that she will be honored on Monday.    Happy Thanksgiving and Thank You!  Ann      Palo Alto City Council December 2, 2019 Meeting Public Comments Submitted by the Communications Workers of America (CWA) This comment is submitted to the public record on December 2, 2019 by the Communications Workers of America (CWA). The City of Palo Alto has had a contract with Verizon Wireless for wireless, voice, and broadband services, accessories and equipment through the Western State Contracting Alliance (now referred to as NASPO) since 2011. Wireless networks have improved tremendously over the past eight years and the City should be educated on all available platforms that could potentially benefit Palo Alto’s first responders and public servants. One platform in particular, FirstNet, should be considered in discussions of how to meet Palo Alto’s evolving communications needs. FirstNet is the nation’s first interoperable LTE broadband network dedicated to first responders and is interoperable across city agencies. FirstNet offers a range of benefits including prioritization and preemption and a network core built on physically separate hardware and protected by end-to-end encryption which ensures that sensitive public safety communications are separate from consumer traffic. Additionally, there is no throttling on the FirstNet platform. This is important to highlight in the wake of the throttling experienced by the Santa Clara County Fire Protection District from Verizon as it battled the Mendocino Complex Fire in 2018. Today, the Council has an opportunity to discuss whether continuing to solely source its communications service with Verizon best serves Palo Alto. In June 2019, the City of San Jose deployed FirstNet across all of its city agencies including the Police Department, Fire Department, Office of Emergency Management, and Public Works. Mayor Sam Liccardo has stated that citywide implementation of FirstNet in San Jose is helping the City “create a new standard for public safety.” Like Palo Alto, the City of San Jose procures its wireless services through NASPO. FirstNet pricing plans and solutions are easily available to view and procure through NASPO so a change of contracting vehicle would not be necessary to explore this option. CWA urges the Council to review FirstNet pricing plans and solutions available through NASPO and engage in discussions with first responders, public servants, and communications professionals about which platforms can best serve the Palo Alto community at-large. 1 Brettle, Jessica From:herb <herb_borock@hotmail.com> Sent:Monday, December 2, 2019 11:43 AM To:Council, City; Clerk, City Subject:December 2, 2019 Council Meeting, Consent Calendar, Item #8 NVCAP Budget Amendment CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.  Herb Borock  P. O. Box 632  Palo Alto, CA 94302    December 2, 2019      DECEMBER 2, 2019 CITY COUNCIL MEETING, AGENDA ITEM #8  NORTH VENTURA COORDINATED AREA PLAN BUDGET AMENDMENT      Dear City Council:    I urge you to remove this item from your Consent Calendar and continue the item until after you have enacted an interim ordinance, including extending the interim ordinance for a total of the maximum 24 months, pursuant to Government Code Section 65858 prohibiting any uses that may be in conflict with the contemplated North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan (NVCAP) that the City Council, Planning & Transportation Commission, and Planning Division are studying.    It is bad policy for you to approve the proposed budget amendment while developers can bring forward project proposals that would conflict with the NVCAP during the period while the plan is being developed.    The City’s official website has a poor search function, but I have been able to use that search function to locate some of the ordinances that prior City Councils have used to enact interim ordinances and to extend those ordinances, including Ordnance Nos. 4675, 4684, 4689, 4690, 4781, 4783, 4921, and 4927.    Thank you for your consideration of these comments    Sincerely,    Herb Borock     1 Brettle, Jessica From:Pete Weldy <pweldy@siliconvalleycf.org> Sent:Tuesday, November 26, 2019 10:33 AM To:Council, City Cc:Gina D. Dalma; Mariah Moore Subject:Re Action Item 10 - Urgency Ordinance for Just Cause Evictions Attachments:Re Action Item 10 - Urgency Ordinance for Just Cause Evictions.pdf CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.  Mayor Filseth and Members of the Palo Alto City Council, On behalf of Silicon Valley Community Foundation, I’d like to submit the attached letter supporting Action Item 10 on the December 2, 2019 Council agenda. If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to reach out. Thank you for your service and consideration of this urgent matter. Pete Weldy Director of Public Policy Silicon Valley Community Foundation Direct: 650.450.5427 | Mobile: 765.337.6583 | pweldy@siliconvalleycf.org siliconvalleycf.org | twitter | facebook  Pronouns: he/him/his IMPORTANT NOTICE: This message is intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please erase all copies of the message and its attachments and notify me immediately. Thank you.   November 25, 2019 City of Palo Alto 250 Hamilton Avenue Palo Alto, CA 94301 RE: Action Item #10 -Urgency Ordinance for just Cause Evictions to Protect Palo Alto Families Dear Mayor Filseth and Members of the City Council: On behalf of Silicon Valley Community Foundation (SVCF), I write to urge members of the City Council to support Action Item #10 to adopt an urgency ordinance to provide just cause eviction protections to Palo Alto tenants until California State Assembly Bill 1482 takes effect on January 1, 2020. SVCF has made increasing the supply of affordable housing and protecting vulnerable individuals and families from being displaced one of our highest institutional priorities. We believe having a place to call home is a human right and our goal is to invest in strategies that create communities in which everyone has a place to live. We are now confronted with housing challenges that have reached epic proportions and once again our lowest-income and most vulnerable groups are being hit the hardest. According to the National Low Income Housing Coalition, there are only 31 affordable and available rental units for every 100 extremely low- income households in the San Francisco, Oakland, and Hayward metropolitan area. Close to 70 percent of these households are using more than half of their income to cover housing costs. While we have been working with our partners and Governor Newsom to sign a suite of housing legislation to address some of these challenges-including AB 1482, which significantly reforms current policy for rental housing owners and tenants-I am extremely concerned about the recent surge in evictions as landlords impose rent increases (some as high as 70 percent) now before this new law takes effect. These rent increases create even more pressure for low-income and people of color and could eventually lead to their evictions from homes where some have been living for nearly two decades. We can work together to change this damaging trend. Tenant protections, such as just-cause eviction ordinances have proven to be one of the most effective tools in stabilizing communities. That is why we ask for your leadership on this important issue and urge your support of this emergency ordinance. It would preclude landlords from serving tenants with baseless eviction notices keeping families and communities intact until the longer-term protections of AB 1482 are fully implemented. I sincerely appreciate your consideration of SVCF's request. Please do not hesitate to contact me at any time at 650.450.5400 to discuss our support further. Nicole Taylor President and CEO 2440 West El Camino Real, Suite 300 I Mountain View, California 94040-1498 I tel: 650.450.5400 I fax: 650.450.5401 I siliconvalleycf.org 1 Brettle, Jessica From:Helen <skybluelinen@gmail.com> Sent:Saturday, November 30, 2019 5:00 PM To:Council, City Subject:Re: [Rent cap law] CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.  Hello. I'd like to make sure that my initial email has incorrect information; and so, that it does not get used at the  upcoming council meeting regarding the urgency rental ordinance. Thank you, Helen    On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 11:08 PM Helen <skybluelinen@gmail.com> wrote:  Hello! I'm glad this was not a part of yesterday's meeting. I wrote the incorrect date. My lease expires on the 31st.    On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 1:50 AM Helen <skybluelinen@gmail.com> wrote:  Should also read:     prevent terminations* without just cause    On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 10:24 PM Helen <skybluelinen@gmail.com> wrote:  Should read:     Thank you for your* time and consideration,  Helen Kim    On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 10:15 PM Helen <skybluelinen@gmail.com> wrote:  Dear Council Member,     I'm appealing to you to pass the "urgency ordinance" to prevent evictions without just cause.    Let me briefly describe my situation. I am a city employee currently supporting myself and my mother in a one‐ bedroom multi‐unit rental whose lease is about to expire on December 1st.    In previous years, I have received my lease renewal notification a month or two in advance. This year, I have not yet  received anything with only two weeks remaining on my lease.    My fear is that either my residency will be terminated or there will be a drastic increase in my monthly rate. I would  be forced to relocate from a town that I have lived and worked in for 11 years.    The timing of the state bill's effective date of January 1st leaves me and possibly many others like myself vulnerable.   Thank you for time and consideration,  Helen Kim    657 Everett Ave. #1  Palo Alto, CA 94301  1 Brettle, Jessica From:Keshav Kumar <kkumar@caanet.org> Sent:Monday, December 2, 2019 3:46 PM To:Council, City Cc:Joshua Howard Subject:Agenda Item 10: Just Cause Urgency Ordinance -- Corrected Correspondence Attachments:Palo Alto Letter REVISED 1.pdf CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.  Mayor Filseth and Councilmembers,     Attached please find an updated letter from the California Apartment Association’s Tri‐County Division (CAA Tri County)  with feedback and concerns on the proposed urgency ordinance requiring just cause to terminate a residential rental  tenancy.     This letter replaces the letter sent at 1PM.     Thank you,     Keshav Kumar ▪ Public Affairs Coordinator California Apartment Association 1530 The Alameda, Suite 100, San Jose, CA 95126 kkumar@caanet.org ▪ O: (408) 342-3508 |   December 2, 2019 Honorable Mayor Filseth and City Council City of Palo Alto 250 Hamilton Avenue Palo Alto, CA 94301 RE: December 2, 2019 City Council Agenda Item #10: Just Cause for Eviction Urgency Ordinance – CORRECTED CORRESPONDENCE Dear Mayor Filseth and Councilmembers: The California Apartment Association’s Tri-County Division (CAA Tri-County) has serious concerns with the proposed just cause for eviction urgency ordinance on your agenda for December 2, 2019. CAA questions the necessity of the ordinance for several reasons. First, Palo Alto already requires just cause to evict a resident living in an apartment complex with more than 50 units. It is unclear how the current urgency ordinance would be reconciled with the city’s current ordinance. Second, Governor Newsom signed and extended a declaration of a State of Emergency which has imposed rent and eviction limitations on rental housing. And, perhaps most important is the retroactive nature of the proposed ordinance, which might not only be negated by the statewide declaration but could expose the city to possible legal challenges. On October 27, 2019 Governor Newsom signed an emergency declaration in response to the fires impacting the state. That declaration under Penal Code 396, caps rent increases during the duration of the declared State of Emergency at 10% and requires a landlord show cause to terminate a tenancy to avoid a landlord terminating a tenancy to circumvent the imposed price caps. Any lease termination that occurred from October 27, 2019 to November 26, 2019, including those in Palo Alto, would have required cause in order to be effective. Adding a retroactive component to your ordinance as contemplated under Section 2(F) would be duplicative for those lease terminations going back from October 27 to November 26 and could be unnecessary since Palo Alto already requires cause to evict for tenancies in apartment buildings with more than 50 units. Since the urgency ordinance the City Council will consider is viewed as retroactive under the provisions in Section 2(F), there is a concern that retroactively requiring cause may be legally questionable as it has the effect of substantially changing the substantive rights of property owners in violation of existing California statutes. The difficulty with this position is that it effects substantive legal rights of owners who follow the existing law before the urgency ordinance, and when such notice was presented to the Tenant back in September or October, to terminate the tenancy, but an unlawful detainer has yet to be filed, the Ordinance has the effect of substantially changing substantive rights of property owners in violation of existing California statutes. See, Security Bank v. Superior Court, 15 Cal. 4th 232, 243 (1997) and City of Monte Sereno v. Padgett, 149 Cal App. 4th, 1530, 1539 (2007). Retroactive legislation which modifies substantive rights are simply not acceptable within California State law. Furthermore, several cities that considered an urgency ordinance rejected adding a retroactive component. Those cities include Daly City, Milpitas, Foster City, Burlingame, South San Francisco and San Bruno. The statewide emergency declaration and the city’s own ordinance should address the City’s concerns of any lease terminations that were done as a result of AB1482. To ensure a legally defensible and workable ordinance, the Council should remove Section 2(F) from the ordinance. Sincerely, Joshua Howard Senior Vice President California Apartment Association, Tri-County Division 1 Brettle, Jessica From:John Hutar <john@smccvb.com> Sent:Monday, December 2, 2019 3:40 PM To:Council, City Cc:Flaherty, Michelle; Matt Dolan (matt.dolan@hilton.com) Subject:E-mail from Hilton Garden Inn Palo Alto voicing support for continuation of TBID CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.  From: Tom McEvoy   Sent: Monday, November 04, 2019 5:28 PM  To: ed.shikada@cityofpaloalto.org  Cc: Matt Dolan <Matt.Dolan@hilton.com>  Subject: HGI Palo Alto  Hello Ed, I am writing on behalf of Hilton Garden Inn Palo Alto to voice our support of continuing the tbid agreement with SMCCVB. We understand that there has been discussion about the city of Palo Alto moving in another direction. Our preference is to maintain the status quo and keep the current agreement in place. Is the city of Palo Alto close to making a final decision on this issue? Hopefully, the hotels will be consulted by the city at some point. Please let me know if we can contribute anything further. Tom Tom McEvoy  General Manager    4216 El Camino Real  Palo Alto CA 94306  +1 650 352 8368 Office  +1 650 843 0796 Fax    tom.mcevoy@hilton.com  paloalto.HGI.com  This transmission is not a digital or electronic signature and cannot be used to form, document, or authenticate a contract. Hilton and its affiliates accept no liability arising in connection with this transmission. Copyright 2019 Hilton Proprietary and Confidential 1 Brettle, Jessica From:Julie Handley <jhandley@dinahshotel.com> Sent:Monday, December 2, 2019 3:45 PM To:Council, City Subject:Resolution Regarding Participation of Palo Alto Hotels CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.  Dear City Council Members,     I wanted to share a few thoughts with you regarding the proposal for a separation from the SMCCVB and that Palo Alto  would essentially create a new entity to assist the Palo Alto Hotels going forward.     A few months ago John Hutar,  President and CEO of the SMCCVB, did a presentation to the some of the hotels in Palo  Alto and explained the benefits of the SMCCVB.  The presentation was very specific and included a detailed budget that  outlined where the money was spent and reminded us of the long term benefits of an organization that has been in  business for many years.     So far I have not seen a budget for the proposed new organization, nor have I seen any kind of “action plan” indicating  what possible or potential benefits would be generated by leaving the SMCCVB.     My family opened Dinah’s Garden Hotel more than 60 years ago.  Today it is a very viable and popular hotel that with a  diverse cliental.     I am personally very pleased with the attention that the SMCCVB has given to Dinah’s and believe it has provided a  benefit.     Sincerely,     Julie Handley     Julie Handley  CEO/Owner   Dinah's Garden Hotel   4261 El Camino Real  Palo Alto, CA 94306‐4405  (650) 493‐2844 Office  (707) 481‐4494 Cell  (650) 856‐4713 Fax  jhandley@dinahshotel.com  http://www.dinahshotel.com/     1 Brettle, Jessica From:herb <herb_borock@hotmail.com> Sent:Monday, December 2, 2019 12:32 PM To:Council, City; Clerk, City Subject:December 2, 2019 Council Meeting, Item #14: Conference with Labor Negotiators CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.  Herb Borock  P. O. Box 632  Palo Alto, CA 94302    December 2, 2019    Palo Alto City Council  250 Hamilton Avenue  Palo Alto, CA 94301      DECEMBER 2, 2019 COUNCIL MEETING, AGENA ITEM #14  CLOSED SESSION, CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS      Dear City Council:    Prior to going into Closed Session to discuss this item, you are required to state the names of the Council Members who are the City’s Negotiators with each of the Unrepresented Employees to ensure that your negotiators are not a “legislative body” as defined by the Ralph M. Brown Act that does not include a Closed Session exemption for negotiating sessions between a legislative body and another party to the negotiation.    Agenda Item #13, Conference with Real Property Negotiators names the City’s Negotiators that do not include any Council Members.    Those negotiators can have a private meeting with the other party to the negotiation because the City’s negotiators are not a legislative body subject to the Brown Act.    If the City’s Negotiators for Agenda Item #14 are a combination of staff and Council Members, or are two of the three Council Members on one of the Council’s three-member committees, the negotiators would be a legislative body that is prohibited by the Brown Act from having a Closed Session with the other negotiating party.    Thank you for your consideration of these comments.    Sincerely,  1 Brettle, Jessica From:Yahoo Mail.® <honkystar@yahoo.com> Sent:Monday, December 2, 2019 5:43 PM To:Frank Agamemnon Subject:9-11 TRUTH MOVERS AND SHAKERS "WE HAVE OUR FEET IN THE CASTLE" GRAND JURY IN THE MAKING CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.  LCfor911 President David R. Meiswinkle at National Press Club on September 11, 2019    To help prprivacy, Mprevented download from the In LCfor911 President David R. Meiswinkle at National Press Club on Septemb... Read about the Lawyers' Committee FBI Lawsuit & Grand Jury Petition here http://lcfor911.org First Responders Ur....     ? How many Americans DON'T KNOW this? "WE HAVE OUR FEET IN THE CASTLE" THANKS TO THE LAWYERS COMMITTEE OUR BRAVE RELENTLESSLY MOVING FORWARD COURAGEOUS BROTHERS AND SISTERS TAKING STEPS TO LEAD OUR COUNTRY FOR THE TRUTH ABOUT 9/11? 18 YEARS? TO GET A GRAND JURY? MOVING? MIND‐ BOGGLING https://youtu.be/GSIBh8lWIow What happened to the upper section of this Skyscraper on 9/11? Question: Shouldn’t it have fallen to the ground in one piece? Answer: The entire section was literally blown up and pulverized in midair. Military Grade Nano Thermite was analyzed in the dust of 9/11 by three Independent Laboratories: 1. RJ LEE Report, May 2004: NANO THERMITE 2 2. U.S. Geological Survey, 2005: NANO THERMITE 3. Dr. Steven Jones, 2008: NANO THERMITE https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10156432266331961&set=a.10152689350646961&type=3&eid=ARAWSe BkDcxTaKs9v22vP9FtBwyvmze9jNWWpcz4L0AlvUd‐8DZE2CeEkIapMrUeJJCnJq1G0qmGPvGD https://youtu.be/ww8hBFNY8jk Eric Sandstrom ‐ Am I delusional? Or am I watching the top... To help prprivacy, Mprevented download from the In Eric Sandstrom - Am I delusional? Or am I watching the top... Am I delusional? Or am I watching the top of this building explode? Or maybe perhaps it is just “some sort of is...    Richard Gage and Ted Walter Recap an Historic 9/11 Anniversary Richard Gage and Ted Walter Recap an Historic 9/11 Anniversary    To help prprivacy, Mprevented download from the In Richard Gage and Ted Walter Recap an Historic 9/11 Anniversary Host Andy Steele is joined by AE911Truth's Richard Gage and Ted Walter for a recap this year's anniversary event...     AWAKENING THE MASSES IS THE KEY TO THE END 3 OF THE WAR ON TERRORISM AND DIVISION OF ALL Explosives used on 9/11 say commissioners ‐ Common Ground    Explosives used on 9/11 say commissioners - Common Ground For the first time, an elected body in the US is stating that explosives destroyed the three World Trade Center ....     Frank Agamemnon    To help prprivacy, Mprevented download from the In Frank Agamemnon By Craig McKee. For the first time ever, an elected body in the United States is stating that it is “beyond any...    https://youtu.be/S2Z62zWA120 or CIA 9‐11 Whistleblower Susan Lindauer Interview 4    To help prprivacy, Mprevented download from the In CIA 9-11 Whistleblower Susan Lindauer Interview Susan Lindauer has written a self-published book about her experience, Extreme Prejudice: The Terrifying Story o...    https://www.quora.com/How‐many‐Americans‐are‐aware‐that‐off… Susan Lindauer on 9/11: A CIA Agent's Back Story    To help prprivacy, Mprevented download from the In Susan Lindauer on 9/11: A CIA Agent's Back Story Susan Lindauer on 9/11: A CIA Agent's Back Story Recorded on October 5, 2012 by Tom Finnell at the Hooker Dunham...    5 https://www.google.com/search… GAIA GREAT https://wwwlower‐susan‐lindauer?fullplayer=feature.gaia.com/video/cia‐whistleb 9/11 Truth Action Project    9/11 Truth Action Project The mission of the 9/11 Truth Action Project is to build and mobilize a global grassroots movement that will exp...     I am the face of truth for 911 Truth    I am the face of truth for 911 Truth    6 The Lawyers' Committee for 9/11 Inquiry    The Lawyers' Committee for 9/11 Inquiry To develop and implement a detailed legal strategy to achieve transparency and accountability under the law, reg...    https://drop.space/…/9‐11‐the‐footage‐they‐didn‐039‐t‐let‐y… Ken O'Keefe is re‐releasing his epic expose of the Israeli/Jewish lies about Iran that are being employed just as the "WMD's in Iraq" lie was used to send American sons and daughters off to die for Israel in the invasion/occupation of Iraq. With Syria not all going to plan, the ultimate target of Iran and the World War III agenda looks to be in overdrive with President Trump continuing the sickening and sycophantic role of Jewish US Presidents as Jewish whipping boys. How many more American sons and daughters will be sacrificed for Israel before genuine American patriots stand up and refuse orders and arrest the traitors in Congress? GOING VIRAL Ken O'Keefe ༇༈༉༊་༌།ϪϫϬ ༇༈༉༊་༌།⩇⩈⩉ https://vimeo.com/225632936.... https://colorado911truth.org/ 7 https://www.quora.com/How‐many‐Americans‐are‐aware‐that‐off… https://youtu.be/Y5Lb_7ycx04 https://www.ae911truth.org/…/519‐lawsuit‐seeks‐answers‐on‐f… https://www.youtube.com/watch… https://youtu.be/‐MqVY1‐ncBI https://youtu.be/Kd6vR1J0_6A https://www.ae911truth.org/…/540‐new‐york‐area‐fire‐commiss… https://www.youtube.com/attribution_link… http://gunsandbutter.org/... https://youtu.be/l0Q5eZhCPuc https://youtu.be/8DOnAn_PX6M https://youtu.be/0aXVzLMVdWM https://topdocumentaryfilms.com/new‐american‐century/ PLEASE SHARE TO ALL GROUPS? BECAUSE I CAN'T? "WE HAVE OUR FEET IN THE CASTLE" IT'LL BE OVER "SOONER RATHER THAN LATER" LAWYERSCOMMITTEEFOR9‐11INQUIRY.ORG The Lawyers' Committee for 9/11 Inquiry To develop and implement a detailed legal strategy to achieve transparency and accountability under the law, regarding the unprosecuted crimes of 911 Allan Zabrosky https://youtu.be/4n8536CogZo CIA FACEBOOK BLOCKED ME WHAT A BUNCH OF RETARDS WILL YOU SHARE THIS WITH ME ϪϫϬ "WE HAVE OUR FEET IN THE CASTLE" https://youtu.be/Y5Lb_7ycx04 https://www.ae911truth.org/…/519‐lawsuit‐seeks‐answers‐on‐f… https://www.youtube.com/watch… https://youtu.be/‐MqVY1‐ncBI https://youtu.be/Kd6vR1J0_6A https://www.ae911truth.org/…/540‐new‐york‐area‐fire‐commiss… https://www.youtube.com/attribution_link… http://gunsandbutter.org/... https://youtu.be/l0Q5eZhCPuc https://youtu.be/8DOnAn_PX6M https://youtu.be/0aXVzLMVdWM https://topdocumentaryfilms.com/new‐american‐century/ 8 PLEASE SHARE TO ALL GROUPS? BECAUSE I CAN'T? "WE HAVE OUR FEET IN THE CASTLE" IT'LL BE OVER "SOONER RATHER THAN LATER" LAWYERSCOMMITTEEFOR9‐11INQUIRY.ORG The Lawyers' Committee for 9/11 Inquiry To develop and implement a detailed legal strategy to achieve transparency and accountability under the law, regarding the unprosecuted crimes of 911 https://youtu.be/4n8536CogZo Image may contain: cloud, sky, skyscraper and outdoor Frank Agamemnon August 30 at 12:56 AM FOR THIS BUILDING TO COME STRAIGHT THROUGH 76 FLOORS? OF STEEL FRAMED HIGH RISE? DEFIES LAWS OF PHYSICS AS THE LAW OF FALLING BODIES CLEARLY, STATES WILL FOLLOW THE PATH OF LEAST RESISTANCE? GHEEEZ IT'S AT A 23 DEGREE ANGLE? OFF CENTER? SEPARATED FROM 76 INTACT FLOORS? https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10156432266331961&set=a.10152689350646961&type=3&eid=ARAWSe BkDcxTaKs9v22vP9FtBwyvmze9jNWWpcz4L0AlvUd‐8DZE2CeEkIapMrUeJJCnJq1G0qmGPvGD __._,_.___ Posted by: =?UTF-8?Q?Yahoo_Mail=2E=C2=AE?= <honkystar@yahoo.com> Reply via web post • Reply to sender • Reply to group •Start a New Topic •Messages in this topic (1) Please visit the ultimate resource for defending liberty. CLICK HERE: http://targetfreedom.com/ This is the Most Extensive Collection of Freedom Videos Ever Compiled: http://targetfreedom.com/videos-to-watch/best-collection-of-freedom-videos/ Books about defending liberty http://americanistbookstore.com/ and: http://www.amazon.com/shops/jperna12 What is The Answer To The Greatest Question? Click here: http://americanistbookstore.com/books/answer-to-the-greatest-question/ or here: http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/097871461X?ie=UTF8&seller=A1AVPSERX4QF0E&sn=jperna12 HERE IS your Free DISCOUNT Card FOR Prescription, Lab and Imaging. UP TO 75% OFF JUST CLICK HERE: http://www.freerxplus.com/DDBSF2131/en/index.html 9 OR HERE: http://targetfreedom.com/discounted-prescription-and-laboratory-service/ The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing. Edmund Burke VISIT YOUR GROUP To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.Yahoo! Groups • Privacy • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use . __,_._,___ 1 Brettle, Jessica From:Ann Balin <alafargue@mac.com> Sent:Monday, December 2, 2019 10:16 PM To:Council, City Subject:CDC warns people avoid THC products in particular during lung disease outbreak - SFGate CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on  links.  ________________________________    https://m.sfgate.com/health/article/CDC‐warns‐people‐avoid‐THC‐products‐in‐particular‐14474343.php?t=826683885b     Sent from my iPhone  1 Brettle, Jessica From:Kathy Jordan <kjordan114wh@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, December 3, 2019 4:32 PM To:Council, City Cc:editor@paweekly.com; Dave Price; gsheyner@paweekly.com; Emily Mibach Subject:re City fee surpluses and raising fees nonetheless - surreptitious taxes CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.  Dear City Council:     I hope you saw the Daily Post article yesterday on the City's utility surplus and such, and the City's plan to nonetheless  raise utility and other fees on City residents.  I hope you all will put an immediate stop to this plan.  Please do not further  raise fees on City residents; utility rates and other fees are already extremely high.  Please honor your residents and  taxpayers who support and finance the City.     I hope that you will also put a stop to the City practice of taking utility (or other) fee surpluses to finance the City's  general fund ‐ rather than funding it via voter approved tax revenues.      Taking taxpayer dollars via elevated fees, beyond cost, and then using those fee surpluses to finance general fund  expenditures, seems a less than legitimate workaround to dodge having to get voter approval for tax increases.  In this  manner, non voter approved fees become unapproved taxes.  I note the City has been sued for this very practice.  Please  end it and in doing so, honor your residents and taxpayers who support and finance the City.    Thank you for your consideration.     Best,    Kathy Jordan  1 Brettle, Jessica From:Fred Balin <fbalin@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, December 3, 2019 2:34 PM To:Council, City Subject:My Comments Re P&TC of Yesterday CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on  links.  ________________________________    Good evening.    It is now 12 weeks since I submitted my investigation: "The Commissioner, the Carports, and the City."    It details how Planning Commissioner Michael Alcheck subverted the intent of city laws with regard to placement of  covered parking on two properties in which he had an economic interest, violated building codes during construction  and again after final inspection, disregarded both the appearance and letter of state conflict of interest codes, and  dragged staff down into the realm of secrecy and self‐protection.    Yet, Alcheck remains on the commission.    I do recognize and see the value in the City Manager bringing forward to you, next week, direction related to Procedures  and Protocols for Boards and Commissions and specifically, commissioner conduct including a process for removal.    But the latter already exists. Municipal Code Section 2.16.020, titled “Removal" states: The appointing authority may  remove any member [of a board or commission] with the approval of the council.    That’s it. There is no vested right or due process for an appointed commissioner. But there is an obligation for the city  council to deal with an individual and improper actions that have been clearly documented.    Why no action to date? History brings cause for worry.    Last time, I mentioned the powerhouse 2010 Planning and Transportation Commission which held 30 meetings. It  included the late, great, and sadly forgotten Eduardo Martinez. Among the others were two highly intelligent, extremely  well‐prepared, thoughtful, clearly‐spoken, respectful individuals, dedicated to the public interest. But when it came to  reappointment time, other factors proved more important to some decision makers. In 2011, Susan Fineberg was  replaced by Michael Alcheck, and in 2014, Arthur Keller was replaced by Kate Downing.    There is no guarantee for any board or commission member to be reappointed, but the personal qualities that I cited,  together with positive and productive experience at the dais, should weigh heavily as you move through the current  appointment process. You want the most thorough, complete, well‐articulated, on‐point discussion and  recommendations, consistent with city law and your direction, for the benefit of the public and your best decision  making.    Finally, if Michael Alcheck, currently vice chair, does not leave the commission in the near term, he will undoubtedly  want to become chair again for 2020. Hopefully, enlightenment among commissioners will prevent that and send its  own message. Far better yet, however, if you act beforehand.    Thank you.  1 Brettle, Jessica From:Jeff Hoel <jeff_hoel@yahoo.com> Sent:Sunday, December 1, 2019 3:54 PM To:UAC Cc:Hoel, Jeff (external); Council, City Subject:Comments -- Utility Pole Attachment Agreements and Operations CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.  Commissioners, Item IX.2 on your 12-04-19 agenda http://cityofpaloalto.org/civicax/filebank/documents/74219 is a discussion item about "Utility Pole Attachment Agreements and Operations." As usual, I wonder why it was agendized as a discussion item rather than an action item. A perfunctory one-page staff report attached 10 pages of presentation slides. http://cityofpaloalto.org/civicax/filebank/documents/74160 The usual purpose of presentation slides is to remind folks of what they read in the staff report, not to be a substitute for a staff report. Please see, below the "######" line, a text version of the presentation slides, with my comments -- paragraphs (in red) beginning with "###". Thanks. Jeff ------------------- Jeff Hoel 731 Colorado Avenue Palo Alto, CA 94303 ------------------- PS: Unfortunately, I cannot attend the 12-04-19 UAC meeting. ############################################################################################# --- slide 1 --- Overview of Utility Pole Attachments and Operations Utilities Advisory Commission December 4, 2019 --- slide 2 --- Background Joint Pole Agreement * City and AT&T jointly own and maintain the majority of wood utility poles in Palo Alto under a Joint Pole Agreement (1918) ### Can you be more specific than just "majority"? 2 * Total number of poles = ~6,000. Jointly-owned=~5,400 ### Does the City have a record of exactly how many poles there are, and exactly how many are jointly-owned? And exactly who they're owned with? * Poles are in 5’ increments (35’,40’,45’,etc.) ### The City should have a record of how tall each pole is, right? ### I don't think the slide is trying to say that the City has no poles that are, say, 37 feet tall, right? and classified by strength (Class 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, H1, H2, etc.) ### What do the strength codes mean? Is the strength code of each pole reassessed at regular intervals over its lifetime? * AT&T purchases space for their facilities (typically 2’-3’ in the Communication Zone) Other Agreements * Master License Agreement - City-controlled space on poles for wireless communication facilities (e.g. DAS and small cell) * Dark Optical Fiber Backbone License Agreement, City licenses dark fiber attached on poles and underground to third parties --- slide 3 --- Joint Pole Zones ### What can we learn from the illustration example of a 45-foot pole? * Is the underground portion always 6 feet? * Is the support structure always 18 feet? * Is the communication zone always 6 feet? * Is the safety clearance zone always 6 feet? * Is the power zone always 9 feet? For other pole sizes, how large are the various zones? • City controls power and safety clearance zones • City and AT&T shares the communication zone, support structure and footage in ground • Communication Zone is typically 5’. AT&T purchases 3’ and City owns 2’. ### The illustration on this slide shows a pole where the communication zone is 6 feet. Is that atypical? ### Does the City have records, for each pole, of exactly how much of the communication zone the City has and exactly how much AT&T has? • AT&T leases their space to Comcast in the Communication zone ### Does the City have records, for each pole, of how much communications space Comcast is leasing from AT&T? • Insufficient communication space may require pole replacement or special construction practices (i.e. cross arm) ### What are the details of what special construction practices are permitted? --- slide 4 --- Why are some poles not tall enough for new attachments? * Typically sized at original installation date – Average pole age is approximately 40–50 years ### This source says, "With proper maintenance, the average lifetime of a wood utility pole is typically 30 to 40 years." https://enviroliteracy.org/environment-society/life-cycle-analysis/wood-utility-pole-life-cycle/ 3 This source says, "Most utilities assume that their poles provide 30 to 40 years of service life." But it also cites various other opinions. https://woodpoles.org/portals/2/documents/TB_ServiceLife.pdf It also provides a map of the United States that shows decay hazard zones for wood utility poles. Palo Alto is in an "intermediate" zone. ### Does the City have records that would allow it to calculate the average pole lifetime, say, over the last 50 or 100 years? ### Does the City perform maintenance on poles to extend their service life? ### The average pole age should be about half the average pole lifetime. Right? * Future telecom or other attachments were not anticipated ### Palo Alto has been talking seriously about citywide municipal FTTP for about 20 years. So, for poles younger than 20 years, the needs of "future telecom" should have been "anticipated." Right? * Heights generally kept to a minimum to reduce visual impact ### Over the years, how has the benefit of minimizing visual impact been traded off against the benefit of providing adequate telecom space? What is the current policy? * Poles located in backyard easements (25% or 1,500) ### What's the point here? That poles in backyard easements shouldn't have to be used for certain purposes? * Regulations: Although CPAU is not subject to CPUC jurisdiction, CPAU follows the overhead line construction regulations in General Order 95 ### I was very surprised to read this. And I'd like to see it more thoroughly discussed in a real future staff report. In 2005, after the FTTH Trial was terminated, the City said it was compelled by General Order 95 to remove the Trial's fiber infrastructure. But apparently it wasn't really compelled to do so. ### The FTTH Trial deployed aerial fiber infrastructure in the power space, not the communication space. So, it's possible that in 2005 the City decided that the Trial's fiber infrastructure was in the wrong space and should be removed for that reason. But, if so, that should have been the reason cited. --- slide 5 --- Pole Replacements * Replace approximately 100 poles annually due to deterioration; ### This seems to suggest that the average pole lifetime is more like 60 years. (6000 poles / 100 poles/year.) upsize new poles 5’ taller if possible ### What would make this impossible? The cost of a taller pole is minimal. Most of the replacement cost is in the labor. ### Why choose to upsize by exactly five feet? What spaces on the pole does this increase? * Party(s) benefiting from pole replacement shares cost proportionately based on share of pole space owned ### More details would be interesting. How much space should a wireless provider have to pay for? * Sole benefit for 3rd party => 3rd party pays 100% of costs ### More details would be interesting. -- Wouldn't all parties benefit from having a younger pole? -- Could be the "third party" be a) the City, b) AT&T, c) a wireless provider? 4 * Inspection and maintenance costs shared proportionately --- slide 6 --- Master License Agreement (MLA) Background * 2010: Wireless carriers sought to install wireless communication facilities (WCF) on utility and streetlight poles to improve cellular network coverage and capacity * 2011: Council approved MLA template. Agreement provides third party access to and use of City-controlled space on utility poles, streetlight poles and in conduit in the public rights-of-way * 2011 to present: Six MLAs executed. Several active projects * MLA includes pole attachment license fees ($270 pole/year) and energy use charges (rate E-16) * City processes for WCF in parallel with MLA: – Approvals and permitting requirements for WCF administered by other City Departments (e.g. Planning, PublicWorks, etc.) --- slide 7 --- MLA Term and Provisions * Term: 10 years, with 10 year extension option * Application for pole access * Initial/one-time costs and fees * Construction and installation of facilities, including pole make-ready work and/or replacement; GO-95 compliance * Moving facilities (e.g. underground utility districts) * CPAU Inspection and Approval * Unauthorized attachment or occupancy * Other: Indemnification, Insurance, Warranties, Performance Bond, etc. --- slide 8 --- MLA Regulatory and Legal Issues * Under federal and California law, and subject to conditions protecting the City’s public rights-of-way management and compensation authority and land use authority, City cannot prohibit wireline and wireless communications facilities from gaining access to the public rights-of-way and utilities infrastructure * City can establish reasonable rates, terms and conditions of access to utilities infrastructure in the public rights-of-way, including adopting rules and regulations relating to time, place and manner of attachment to that infrastructure --- slide 9 --- FCC 2018 Small Cell Order * Declared that permit fees, ROW use, application fees and attachment fees are unlawful unless they are strictly cost based and no higher than fees charged to similarly-situated competitors ### 03-11-19: "Summary of Final FCC Small Cell Order" -- Next Century Cities https://nextcenturycities.org/wp-content/uploads/Guide-to-FCC-Small-Cell-Order.pdf * Revised “shot clocks” for approvals * Restricts local control over aesthetics: – City adopted an ordinance establishing objective design standards on 4/15/19 (Staff Report ID #9959) ### 04-15-19 Staff report: https://www.cityofpaloalto.org/civicax/filebank/documents/70193 * Pending legal challenges to FCC Order ### 11-29-19: "FCC Cable Order -- What Comes Next for Cities?" -- National League of Cities https://citiesspeak.org/2019/11/29/fcc-cable-order-what-comes-next-for-cities/ ### 08-12-19: "US court hampers FCC small cell plan" https://www.mobileworldlive.com/featured-content/top-three/us-court-hampers-fcc-small-cell-plan/ 5 "In a [08-09-19] Tweet, FCC commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel said the decision meant: 'The agency tasked with the future of connectivity didn’t get it right. It’s time to go back to the drawing board and do better.'" https://twitter.com/JRosenworcel/status/1159850762165542914 --- slide 10 --- Questions? 1 Brettle, Jessica From:Peggy E. Kraft <pkraft@stanford.edu> Sent:Wednesday, November 27, 2019 3:53 PM To:Council, City Subject:Grade Separation CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on  links.  ________________________________    To the City Council Members,    I would like to ask that the City Council considers NOT doing a grade separation at any of the intersections under  consideration in Palo Alto.    I do not think that the benefits outweigh the negative impacts on Palo Alto. I live in South Palo Alto on Mumford Place  which is near the Charleston/Alma intersection. I have driven my car or taken my bike to and from Stanford for work for  33 years and I have always found the extra traffic on Charleston or East Meadow only occurs during the morning and  evening commutes. During the rest of the day there are no traffic problems. Even with the extra trains on the corridor  after it is electrified will still not make grade separation worth the negative impacts.    The reasons I am against the grade separation are the following:    ‐The traffic issues only occur during the morning and the evening commute. The rest of the day has no serious traffic  issues.  ‐The alternatives will all have a negative impact on Palo Alto as the tunnel, viaduct or hybrid will destroy the natural  neighborhood look of the Alma corridor and replace it with either a cement corridor with only train tracks and no trees  or a viaduct which will have areas for homeless people to live under.  ‐The viaduct or hybrid will raise the train above the street level and ruin the peace of the neighborhood.  ‐The extra traffic that will be backed up for a few hours in the morning and the evening can use the same corridors that  are currently used‐  Arastradero, Oregon Expy and San Antonio Road.  ‐Having less traffic cross Alma at these intersections during peak traffic hours will allow better traffic flow on Alma.  ‐The Charleston and the East Meadow  intersections feed into neighborhood/community streets that are not meant to  be an expressway like Oregon Expy or San Antonio road.  ‐The issues of safety for pedestrians and bicyclists can be addresses by putting in a pedestrian underground passageway  like we have now at California Ave and near downtown.  ‐None of the alternatives will stop suicide attempts.  ‐Cars trapped on the tracks does not happen often enough to spend an enormous amount of money to grade separate.  Other mechanical and timing solutions could be implemented.      At the last public meeting I was told that not doing any grade separation at Charleston and East Meadow is not off of the  table until the environmental impact report is done. That sounds to me that it is off the table unless there is a serious  environmental impact. Is it possible for someone to get back to me about this alternative‐ is doing noting is still an  option?    I will be attending all meetings open to the public going forward and hope that my questions can be answered and my  input will be heard.    1 Brettle, Jessica From:Yahoo Mail.® <honkystar@yahoo.com> Sent:Saturday, November 30, 2019 9:14 PM To:Frank Agamemnon Subject:Fw: [The Holocaust Hoax] Breakthrough: U.S. Attorney Agrees to Present Evidence of World Trade Center Demolition to Federal Grand Jury CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.  Hi BROTHERS AND SISTERS Always good to hear from you, I have no sense of time anymore since I retired on Januar 4 2018 WHOOPI hah I should have retired 10 years ago HAH I don't watch TV or have time clocks in my face anymore lol I don't spend too much time on this e-mail account. I now have 13 more MAXED OUT and OTHER VENUES LOL Not only did I crawl too far out on the limb, IT BROKE HAHAHAHHAHAhahahhahahhahhahah I am VP of NJ911AWARE and David Meiswinkle ran into me in Pennsylvania 2010 where I gave him a DVD in the street outside the college UPENN in Rittenhouse Square. Philadelphia (Philly 9/11 Truth Street Action) We met-up in Hightstown New Jersey about a month later and began to conjure up ideas, evolved to NJ911AWARE 2014 David Meiswinkle is PRESIDENT of NJ911AWARE and he is a LAWYER and he is the LEAD CHAIR LAWYER of the LAWYERS COMMITTEE FOR 9/11 INQUIRY "WE HAVE OUR FEET IN THE CASTLE" A GRAND JURY WILL CONVENE :) and under SEPARATE SUIT? The FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION is being SUED too (for their role, COVER- UP.) These are NATIONWIDE lawyers coming together as a TEAM to PROVE THE LIES we were told about 9/11, a DIFFERENT BREED of lawyers, NOT ESQUIRES OF THE COURTS? The judges on up KNOW they DON'T have a choice, by law, they MUST provide the GRAND JURY with ALL the evidence FILED on April 10, 2018, and July 30, 2018, or else they are held under MISPRISON OF TREASON? (JAILTIME) On December 23, 2018, WE GOT THE GRAND JURY? never happened in the whole 17 YEARS PRIOR? MIND-BOGGLING Check this INFO out as YOU will have what THEY HAVE The FIRST STEP is to PROVE the LIE because NO ONE WILL DIE FOR A LIE, RIGHT? :) The who what when where how and WHY will follow 6 months to one year later MAXIMUM TIME (UNDER LAW) YEAH BABY NOW THAT'S WHAT I'M TALKIN ABOUT Help Continue the Investigations for 9/11 Truth       2 To help prprivacy, Mprevented download from the In Help Continue the Investigations for 9/11 Truth The Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry is working hard to reopen 9/11 investigations. In addition to a NYC Gran...     https://www.lawyerscommitteefor9‐11inquiry.org/… https://youtu.be/Y5Lb_7ycx04 https://www.ae911truth.org/…/519‐lawsuit‐seeks‐answers‐on‐f… https://youtu.be/Kd6vR1J0_6A… https://scontent‐ort2‐2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0‐ 9/22045820_483625681998325_2288136210776403916_n.jpg?_nc_cat=104&_nc_ht=scontent‐ort2‐ 2.xx&oh=9978c4a1aa7800ff686afeb92265b8ca&oe=5D9A19E4 LAWYERSCOMMITTEEFOR9‐11INQUIRY.ORG The Lawyers' Committee for 9/11 Inquiry To develop and implement a detailed legal strategy to achieve transparency and accountability under the law, regarding the unprosecuted crimes of 9/11   To help protect your privacy, Microsoft Office prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.alt   On Monday, April 15, 2019, 4:58:29 PM EDT, Jim Kinstrey <kjimbok46@msn.com> wrote: Begin forwarded message: Frankie...Its about time u contacted me.Ha !…Really, Thanks for this heads-up. At this point I hope something will rise to the surface but Im not holding my breath. Seems timely too since the plot against Trump is looking to close but the truth may come out about the Dem’s role to fabricate All the claims leading to their coordinated ‘resistance’. So how are you doing, retired now? Sorry I lost touch but u seemed to have crawled to far-out on the limb and I felt I couldn’t reach you. I hear from Glenn & I call Bill Nelligan now & then. Stay well. Keep me posted, thanks again…Jim  GET INVOLVED o        3             NEWS  DONATE  SUBSCRIBE   Breakthrough: U.S. Attorney Agrees to Present Evidence of WTC Demolition to Federal Grand Jury Finally, after 17 long years, the 9/11 Truth Movement has opened an avenue to prosecuting those responsible for the shocking destruction of the World Trade Center and the horrible loss of life that resulted. Last spring, the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry — together with more than a dozen 9/11 family members and with help from AE911Truth — filed a petition with the U.S. Attorney in Manhattan demanding that he present evidence of unprosecuted federal crimes at the World Trade Center to a special grand jury. Then, in November, came the big news: The U.S. Attorney notified the Lawyers’ Committee in writing that he would comply with the provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 3332 requiring him to relay their report to a special grand jury. Now the Lawyers' Committee and AE911Truth are working to ensure a thorough and successful grand jury investigation. __._,_.___ Posted by: =?UTF-8?Q?Yahoo_Mail=2E=C2=AE?= <honkystar@yahoo.com> Reply via web post • Reply to sender • Reply to group •Start a New Topic •Messages in this topic (1) "Freedom means the right to say that two plus two equals four. Once this is granted, all else follows." - George Orwell, 1984 VISIT YOUR GROUP 1 Brettle, Jessica From:Mark Cox <markdarrellcox@icloud.com> Sent:Wednesday, November 27, 2019 11:37 PM To:jd@howardstern.com Subject:John Lennon CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on  links.  ________________________________    Is that John in the Movie "Yesterday" ... How would I know? Haven't seen him forever. Maybe it is. What would that  mean if it is? It would mean they're so brazen they'll abduct anyone they want and then parade them in Front of the  World to prove that either Everyone is as Blind as they are Stupid or else those with Power have No Power because  they're timid and afraid. The Meek will inherent the Earth. What about Heaven?  1 Brettle, Jessica From:Mark Cox <markdarrellcox@icloud.com> Sent:Wednesday, November 27, 2019 2:11 PM To:jd@howardstern.com Cc:MediaInquiries@kushner.com Subject:John's Marriage (iii) CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on  links.  ________________________________    Yoko made John Lennon so Happy he Stopped Singing. Did John Lennon marry Yoko Ono because they threatened to kill  Cynthia Powell Lennon? What happened? She died.    "Keep up the Appearances John. This is your New Job. We got an Alliance with Japan. We need a Bed Scene like the  Godfather. She can be the Horse's Head." Wait. The Godfather was released in 1972. The Bed‐In for Peace was in 1969.  Can anyone Map All the Connections for a Dissertation? More than One of course. We can meet in the Conference  Room and hash this out at 0900. They took your Kid too? Okay. Lets talk about. How many People have you told? No  one? How's that been working out for you?"    The Book "The Godfather" was released March 10, 1969. The Bed‐Ins for Peace begins March 25th, 1969. John allows  Yoko the Part in the Movie. Room 702 in the Amsterdam Hilton Hotel. Vito Corleone is the Don the Patriarch and  Corleone means Lionheart and Paula Wagner who "worked" with Jon Ron Leary Tomczak the Pagan Clown ... Paula  Wagner "Small Dog Wagging the Tail the Clan Depends on. What did he say? Tell Meathead with the Hag Wife aiming for  Hell in a Suitable for her Character Form" Paula's Signature Gathering Company was Braveheart. Oh you're so brave. You  depend on Mario Pusa like Pussies. Slide down the Flag Pole to Hell Ya'll Leary Black Hands. What's it like to be Ruthless?  You cut yourself off from Leviration leading to the Messiah's Incarnation. Ruth Less. Strangers are Stitched In and not  Cut Out. Oh I know. You don't want to be Caught Dead without the Flesh Fabric Ornamentation Wrapped Around your  Heads cause it might be Halloween. Except don't you realize the reason for this? Honestly? Without the Mark of the  Covenant as a Made Man you can expect the Mark of the Beast to Cut Your Mouths Vertically in Half as Unmade Men.  Look in the Mirror with the Resurrection on Judgement Day. "May I take your Order?" The Elevation from Beast to Man  begins with the Declaration, "Let Us Make Man in Our Image and After a Likeness." Apparently being a Man isn't  enough. I wonder why. Too close to Dirt? Bone from the Phallus apparently a Singular Bone is taken and Adam  thereafter says "Flesh of my Flesh." If you skip over that and just focus on the "Bone of my Bones" is that a Self  Revelation? Space is Odd to See? Were you planning on Fucking Roasted Bones in the Burning Fire of Hell? Will they do  that? I don't know. Someones gonna find out. There are some incentives for behavioral modification. It doesn't work for  everyone. So where do you think the Flesh came from? The Backstory of Man's Creation and Graduation on Day Six is  addressed AFTER the Narration of the First Seven Days of Elohim hence this must be a Closer Examination of the Sixth  Day with Respect to Man's Creation and Graduation. The Narrator is being Polite. Man is created BEFORE the Other Land  Animals. Yet it's AFTER the Other Land Animals were created when Man is accepted into Some Kind of School with Only  One Rule. The Diploma is the Wife.    Hence apparently Man was initially created before the All of the Other Land Animals in the Form of "Male Female  Beasts" whether by Appearance or by Double Gendered Souls. I'm assuming Adam had One Friend and this wasn't Eve  as Eve is still the Resident Bone of the Phallus of Adam and Holder of Secrets by the Veil of the Foreskin. This Acceptance  into the "School of One Rule" begins with the Declaration "Let Us Make Man in our Image and After a Likeness." After  this Rule is Attended Adam gets to Practice the Art of Naming Names. Walrus. You really think the Russians will come if  the United States builds a Wall? United States. Statutes. The Divided Congress. "Divided they fell with a 22 Trillion Dollar  Debt." Kinda like JFK was Deboned in the Head on the 22nd Day of November in 1963? Who was that Guy James  2 Madison? Mad Division Son. You multiplied. "2/2 = 1" and "1/2 = Where did the One Go? How'd you get 22 Trillion?"  Now then during the Ecstasy of Sleep ... Oh we already covered that One. Without the Circumcision the Male Man is the  Entity still hovering in the Beast Threshold. Still learning Bob? You have to wear the Mask to feel secure? Now about that  Forbidden Tree. Are you eating still it? How can you do that? Keep Telling Lies : By Death shall ye Die. Elohim is a  Consuming Fire. You have to be Wrapped in the Truth All the Way In.    Now James Madison was the Fourth United States President. Clay Bird History Book. If Sarrah had a Female Soul and the  Translation of Sarrah's to Laughter to Female in the 89th Year of the Life of Sarrah than as the Tetragrammaton is the  Tetragrammaton did the Same Thing Happen with Rebekka, Rachel, and Asenath the Mother of the Cross Blessed Twins  the Daughter of the Priest of Heliopolis? "Asenath what you can do for your Country?" "Well you could try feeding them  some Bread. Give seed to Wildlife."  1 Brettle, Jessica From:Kathy Jordan <kjordan114wh@gmail.com> Sent:Saturday, November 30, 2019 3:46 PM To:Gregory Brail; philburton.pagradecrossings@gmail.com; Carrasco, Tony; inyoungcho0@gmail.com; mkanneXCAP@gmail.com; Lklein40@gmail.com; Kleinberg, Judy; patlau2010@gmail.com; adina.levin@friendsofcaltrain.com; nadianaik@gmail.com; Reckdahl, Keith; David Shen; cari@caritempleton.com; Transportation Cc:Council, City Subject:Opposition to Churchill closure --- from Embarcadero neighborhood Attachments:Stuck on Galvez- green light.jpg CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.  To the XCAP and City of Palo Alto Transportation:     Hello everyone post Thanksgiving!  Thanks to those of you who answered my prior email.   Hope everyone had a nice  Thanksgiving.     I am writing to voice my strong opposition to proposals to close the grade crossing at Churchill Avenue.       As a Palo Alto resident who lives adjacent to Embarcadero Road, it's quite clear that closing the Churchill Avenue grade  crossing would result in increased traffic that would divert to Embarcadero Road, and would deny all Palo Alto residents  the opportunity to use a vital, existing east‐west route through town.      After reading the Palo Alto Weekly's article on the topic, I see that various residents in the neighborhoods adjacent to  Churchill have already been weighing in on this topic. Yet I don't know that my neighborhood members have much done  so, as of yet.   I intend to help inform them, as they might be unaware of these proposals, as I was.  I doubt they will  welcome additional traffic being diverted to our neighborhood due to a Churchill Avenue closure.     Traffic congestion on Embarcadero Road is already very bad, particularly at commute times and particularly when  students are riding bikes to and from Greene MS and to Paly (as well as to Castilleja).   It is already dangerous for our  children to bike to school, crossing Embarcadero at the already existing traffic level.  Traffic on Embarcadero is already  very congested.  Adding further traffic to this route creates heightened safety concerns for our students, adds  environmental concerns for nearby residents, and increases congestion on this vital route, lengthening commute times  for everyone.      As most Palo Alto residents know, Embarcadero Road traffic around Town and Country (Paly) and under the Alma Street  underpass during commute times and during Paly start and end times is already unmanageable.  It is also extremely  congested at the Embarcadero/Middlefield/Newell intersections during the same time periods.  A Churchill Avenue  closure would exacerbate these bottlenecks and backups on Embarcadero Road.   Yet I understand that XCAP members  and City consultants are seriously considering a Churchill Avenue closure.  Why should residents along Embarcadero  Road and Oregon Expressway have to bear this additional burden?  For that matter, why should all Palo Alto residents  lose the opportunity to use and traverse Churchill Avenue?  It's extremely useful. Make the crossing safer, sure, but  don't close it.     Churchill Avenue is a vital artery through the heart of Palo Alto.  We need it.  For example, we Paly parents and our  children use it on a frequent basis to get to the south side of the Paly campus, and sometimes driving there in a car is a  necessity.  The school depends upon its parent volunteers, to shepherd students (via car) from the gym to away games  and meets, ferry equipment, and staff athletic ticket tables and many more tasks.  Closing Churchill makes accessing that  2 side of the Paly campus unnecessarily difficult and much more time consuming.  That is just one example of how using  Churchill Avenue to cross the train tracks is needed, and makes living in Palo Alto easier and more accessible ‐‐‐ there  are many others that can be offered.     At the Mitchell Community Center transportation meeting I attended briefly, I heard a consultant state that 9000 cars  traverse Churchill daily.   This is a important, well used route.  We who live along Embarcadero certainly do not want an  additional 4500 cars using Embarcadero daily; I'm sure the neighbors along Oregon Expressway will feel the same  way.  And, neither do we want to lose the convenience of using Churchill Avenue to get to and fro within Palo Alto.     Please reconsider any proposals that involve a Churchill closure.  Please make the Churchill crossing safer, but do not  close it, and please take ALL affected neighborhoods into consideration.     Thank you.     Best,    Kathy Jordan    P.S.   I've attached a Nov. 15 photo ‐‐‐ of being stuck on Galvez (Stanford side) and not being able to cross El Camino  even though the light was green ‐‐‐ due to a bottleneck of cars plugging up Embarcadero.  This was at 5:10 pm on a  weeknight.       I've had the same thing happen when attempting to make a left turn onto Embarcadero from El Camino, coming from  Menlo Park.  Again, the left turn signal is green, but a number of cars in the line making a left turn cannot advance and  make the turn, as too many cars are stuffed into Embarcadero and backing up onto El Camino.  This was at 5:25 pm on a  weeknight, early November 2019.     Closing Churchill would just make both of these situations worse, on an already over congested  Embarcadero.  Additional cars would back up onto both sides of El Camino and on Galvez; the people that choose to use  Churchill now to get across Alma, or to take Alma south, would use Embarcadero instead.      1 Brettle, Jessica From:Press strong <pressstrong@gmail.com> Sent:Wednesday, November 27, 2019 9:27 PM To:Council, City; Stump, Molly; Shikada, Ed; Human Relations Commission; michael.gennaco@oirgroup.com Cc:leah.wilson@calbar.ca.gov; GC@calbar.ca.gov; ExecutiveDirector@calbar.ca.gov; CMAA@calbar.ca.gov; Vanessa.Holton@calbar.ca.gov; Melanie.Lawrence@cal.bar.gov; asteinbrecher@steinbrecherspan.com; sleyton@altshulerberzon.com; samuelgordonesq@gmail.com; thegordonlawgroup@gmail.com; Cody@salfenlaw.com Subject:PA City Attorney violating public records act CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.  Palo City Attorney Mollly Stump refused to provide information to a woman and her husband in violation of the public  records act.  Ms. Stump capitulated only after a lawyer informed Ms. Stump that she was violating the public records  act.      Now City Attorney Stump is refusing to provide information to Julio Arevalo and his attorney Cody Salfen.    It has been over two months since Mayor Filseth has asked why Sgt. Moore's videos are missing and he still does not  have an answer.  As far as anyone knows, Ms. Stump has not provided Sgt. Adrienne Moore's videos or an explanation as  to why they went missing.  And the videos should not be missing given the system's ensure that no video goes missing  through its Record After The Fact Feature:  https://watchguardvideo.com/software/record‐after‐the‐fact      City Attorney Stump refuses to release the "Independent Police Auditor's" report detailing how the department handled  the using of a racial slur by one it's commanding officers.  https://padailypost.com/2019/10/14/report‐on‐police‐n‐word‐incident‐bottled‐up‐at‐city‐hall/       Shouldn't California Attorney Molly Stump be held accountable for repeatedly violating the laws of California?    2         https://www.paloaltoonline.com/news/2019/11/27/palo‐alto‐police‐hit‐with‐fresh‐claim‐of‐excessive‐force      3     https://www.paloaltoonline.com/news/2019/09/20/on‐the‐ground‐and‐suffering‐a‐seizure‐a‐palo‐alto‐woman‐ pleaded‐to‐be‐taken‐to‐the‐hospital‐but‐police‐kept‐paramedics‐from‐helping‐her‐for‐14‐long‐ minutes?utm_campaign=magnet&utm_source=article_page&utm_medium=related_articles      4   https://www.paloaltoonline.com/news/2019/09/20/911‐nightmare‐a‐tug‐of‐war‐for‐ information?utm_campaign=magnet&utm_source=article_page&utm_medium=related_articles        https://www.paloaltoonline.com/news/2019/09/24/city‐council‐has‐questions‐about‐mishandled‐911‐call    5         6           7   https://www.paloaltoonline.com/news/2013/06/05/palo‐alto‐police‐departments‐tech‐guru‐tapped‐for‐state‐board        https://padailypost.com/2019/10/14/report‐on‐police‐n‐word‐incident‐bottled‐up‐at‐city‐hall/      8 14 missing recordings, will it Destefano's be 15?    https://corruptpaloaltopolice.weebly.com/missing‐videos.html                          https://corruptpaloaltopolice.weebly.com/powers.html    9 https://corruptpaloaltopolice.weebly.com/afanasiev.html      https://chiefburns.weebly.com/exhibit‐5.html              Sounds like Destefano pulled a Fino:        10     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7EJHO0LCn9o&t=8s                11       https://padailypost.com/2019/04/11/newly‐released‐police‐records‐detail‐violent‐takedown‐of‐shoplifting‐suspect/                                          1 Brettle, Jessica From:alicec@melitaisland.com Sent:Sunday, December 1, 2019 8:34 PM To:Council, City Subject:Police response to 911 call CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.  I would like to add my thoughts about the police in Palo Alto. I, too, had an extremely bad experience with the Palo Alto Police Department. I was in a bad car accident and rather than address my medical condition I was taken in for drunk driving although it was 7am and I had not been drinking. I passed all the roadside tests and had 0.0 alcohol on my breath on the breathalyzer test. This police department should be investigated. All the cases should be reviewed and everyone should be on high alert. The Palo Alto Police Department is corrupt and untrustworthy. I hope this sheds some light on a very shady police department. I would be willing to give you my full story and all of the details if this would be helpful. Thank you, Alice Cox 501 Raquel Ct Los Altos, CA 94022 (650)575-3053 1 Brettle, Jessica From:Bryce Avey <bryce.avey@yahoo.com> Sent:Monday, December 2, 2019 12:17 AM To:Council, City Subject:Proposed Vape Ban CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on  links.  ________________________________    Hello,  I heard about the proposal to ban vaping products from Palo Alto. I understand that you’re looking out for your citizens  but I’m worried a ban is going to cause problems. The cause of the lung illness isn’t coming from commercially available  nicotine or THC products. Drug dealers buy THC oil from overseas and they’ve been cutting that oil with canola or  vitamin E oil to make more money. The canola oil vaporizes so it thins out when heated. Unfortunately unlike the  vegetable glycerin that’s used in nicotine products, it thickens up in the lungs and sticks to the walls. This makes it hard if  not impossible to breathe.    If people are unable to purchase nicotine liquid products they will buy them from overseas and that nicotine liquid isn’t  being lab tested. Full disclosure, I’ve been vaping for almost 9 years. I’ve had my doctor check my lungs every other year  during a physical  since I began vaping. I’ve been told they’re fine but 9 years isn’t long enough to study the long term  effects associated with vaping and nicotine addiction causes other problems unrelated to lung damage. I think education  will do more good than a ban. There will always be rebellious teens who want to do the opposite of what they’re told  but education regarding vaping and nicotine use may help the teens that are unsure whether or not they want to vape.  Thank you if you read this whole email, I know it’s pretty long.  ‐Bryce  1 Brettle, Jessica From:Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org> Sent:Thursday, November 28, 2019 2:06 PM To:dennisbalakian; David Balakian; midge@thebarretts.com; Joel Stiner; Mayor; esmeralda.soria@fresno.gov; paul.caprioglio; Mark Standriff; Mark Kreutzer; huidentalsanmateo; Council, City; terry; margaret-sasaki@live.com; vallesR1969@att.net; grinellelake@yahoo.com; becerra.bere11@gmail.com; mthibodeaux@electriclaboratories.com; fmbeyerlein@sbcglobal.net; Doug Vagim; Steve Wayte; nick yovino; robert.andersen; steve.hogg; jerry ruopoli; fmerlo@wildelectric.net; beachrides; Leodies Buchanan; bballpod; bearwithme1016@att.net; Dan Richard; Daniel Zack; kfsndesk; kwalsh@kmaxtv.com; newsdesk; leager; Cathy Lewis; Mark Waldrep; russ@topperjewelers.com; Tom Lang Subject:Fwd: Real ID- Dems should cancel it, this says. CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.    ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Forwarded message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐  From: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org>  Date: Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 1:12 PM  Subject: Fwd: Real ID‐ Dems should cancel it, this says.  To: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org>, Doug Vagim <dvagim@gmail.com>, Steve Wayte  <steve4liberty@gmail.com>      ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Forwarded message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐  From: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org>  Date: Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 2:34 AM  Subject: Fwd: Real ID‐ Dems should cancel it, this says.  To: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org>, Doug Vagim <dvagim@gmail.com>                 Thurs. Nov. 28, 2019‐   Doug‐  FURTHER clarification in this version of the email.  I hope we don't have another  nightmare situation from DMV in five years when real ID holders start renewing them.  Please forward to Patterson if  you can. We need to know exactly what we will need to bring, or send, when we go to renew our real IDs in five years.                    Thurs. Nov. 28, 2019                     Doug‐ This version cleans up some typos and explores the issues with the real ID a little more thoroughly. I  wish Jim Patteson could receive this.                        LH    ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Forwarded message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐  From: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org>  Date: Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 2:12 AM  Subject: Fwd: Real ID‐ Dems should cancel it, this says.  To: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org>  2     ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Forwarded message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐  From: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org>  Date: Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 12:05 PM  Subject: Fwd: Real ID‐ Dems should cancel it, this says.  To: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org>, Doug Vagim <dvagim@gmail.com>, Steve Wayte  <steve4liberty@gmail.com>      ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Forwarded message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐  From: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org>  Date: Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 11:12 AM  Subject: Real ID‐ Dems should cancel it, this says.  To: Loran Harding <loran.harding@stanfordalumni.org>            Wed. Nov. 27, 2019          Doug‐  This is worth reading. The inability to obtain a real ID will do damage to illegals, this says.                 https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#inbox/FMfcgxwGBwSgsHVzqCzjBDwBKSdvgcxM                My DL was up for renewal in Sept, 2018 so I went to the beautiful, big, air‐conditioned DMV office down by the  Fresno zoo  and sailed through the process of getting my first California real ID. That was an old DMV office that has  been renovated. Took my b. certificate  (has to be mighty original‐  b. certificate has the seal on it), plus SS card, plus a  PGE bill. No issues. The clerk took my docs over to a copier, but she  was not copying them, she was scanning them into  the DMV database, I surmised later. She didn't say that that was what was happening. She didn't say anything as she did  this, but that's what she was doing.                  I thought I'd stand in the broiling sun in a line down the street for 4 hours. That was in the news, you'll recall. No,  very easy.                      I was there for maybe 2 hours, an hour of it waiting for my number to come up to go to that station. Big,  beautiful place. You go to ~6 different stations. You take the exam on a computer.                       BTW, the book you study is longer than it used to be. I studied the hell out of it. My DL was going to expire  within 2 weeks after taking the exam, and if you fail the test, you have to wait 2 weeks to re‐take it. I passed it on the  first try but I wasn't casual about studying for it.                   Get an appointment at 8 AM. No issue parking at that hour in the big parking lot at that DMV office, but when I  left people were getting into it with each other over parking spaces.                 THEN it turned out that California DMV was not compliant in 2018 and the first three months of 2019 with  federal law in accepting just one piece of proof of residence‐ my PGE bill. The Feds had said TWO pieces. At about that  point, they fired the Director of DMV. Probably a salary of $300,000 per year with full health and dental benefits and a  big, rich pension, a big private office in Sacto and a huge staff of women and minorities, and she didn't notice that the  feds wanted TWO proofs of residence(!). Can you believe it? No way to call back to D.C. to confirm whether the way she  3 was going to do this was acceptable. Maybe the Apaches had cut the phone lines. Or, too busy out shopping in that new  BMW, apparently. Oh, probably a State supplied BMW to go out shopping in. Recall the State supplied cell phones? So,  for applicants starting in April, 2019, DMV said you had to bring TWO documents showing where you live to get a real ID.  And what about people like me? DMV sent out a form to sign months after I got my real ID in Sept. 2018 on which I  swore that the addy on the form is my residence, as I recall. I signed it and mailed it back (and kept a copy). There had  been rumblings that people like me were going to have to scan in or mail a second proof of res. to DMV.              Recall my PGE bill they scanned? When I go to renew in 5 years, fall of 2023, I'll have to bring a second proof of  residence at that time(?). That was what DMV was saying for a while. My Q is "How many people will remember in 5  years WHAT proof of residence they handed over that got scanned into the system in 2018?" Natch, take several at that  point. Took me a while to figure out that that little issue will be there in 5 years‐ that the proof of residence I provided in  Sept. 2018 is in their system forever and that I'll have to produce a second, additional, different one in 2023‐  I think. So  if you're in that bucket, remember that issue. MAYBE the form on which I swore will negate that need for a second form  of residence proof when I renew the real ID in five years‐ provided that my residence has not changed in the five years.  That form WAS the second proof of where you live, I think. What if your residence HAS changed by the five year mark?  Bring TWO new docs showing your new residence, probably(?). What if you residence has NOT changed by the five year  mark? Bring birth certificate and SS card again? And bring two proofs of residence? Or was once enough for the b. cert  and SS card and proof of residence? If you did what I did‐ provided one evidence of residence when I first applied for the  real ID, and signed the form they later sent to people who did that, do we still have to bring a second, or any, proof of  residence when we apply for a renewal of the real ID in five years? These are questions that DMV is going to have to  answer by the time people start renewing their real ID in five years or we will have mass confusion again. They should be  working out the answers now, and they should be sure they comply with the federal requirements this time. I suggest  they start putting a flyer in the renewal notices about what you should bring with you or mail in when you renew your  real ID AT THE FIVE YEAR MARK. Do that for the next five years, especially if the feds change the requirements for the  real ID again. And start putting flyers in the renewal notices for people who will be applying for a real ID for the first time  telling them what is required. What if you are renewing your normal, non real‐ID DL, have had no moving violations, and  want a real‐ID DL, and would normally just renew by mail? Do they have to mail in two proofs of where they live? Do  they have to come in to a DMV office this time with birth cert., SS card, and two proofs of residence the first time they  apply for a real ID DL? Important: DMV should be getting this information out to drivers.                Then a new issue with DMV.  I renewed my registration on my Fiero in May, 2019.  I mailed the form and check,  had the car smogged, all before the deadline.  AND THEN, five weeks went by.  I really thought that my envelope got  shredded at DMV or the PO, or that the check got stolen, so I called DMV.  I'd thought of putting a STOP on the first  check, but I looked on the DMV website and they warn you there not to do that!!  I was really curious as to where that  check was. At the five week point all I had to show the cops, if stopped, was a thoroughly expired reg.   "We are dealing  with a back‐up" was the answer DMV gave me.  Nothing in the media about that. Let them hang, I guess. Too bad the  California DMV doesn't have access to the media. The new reg. arrived shortly thereafter. So a huge screw‐up in getting  the registrations out. Mail your money a little earlier than usual is the moral, or you'll be driving around with an expired  reg. for a month if the back‐up is still there.                I have to renew the reg. on my other car in January, 2020, and I'll mail the money about a month earlier than  normal.                   Somebody please forward this to Jim Patterson if you can find an email address for him.                     LH            1 Brettle, Jessica From:Anne La <ala986@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, December 3, 2019 10:02 PM To:Council, City Subject:Route 88 cancellation impact -need help CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on  links.  ________________________________    Hello Council Members  I have family member who depends on VTA route 88/88M/88L (Fielding & Louis) to go to work at VA hospital Monday‐ Thursday . Her employment will be impacted w/o public transportation service avail.  Pls consider expanding PA Shuttle service to cover this route at least between 8‐9 am and returning from VA between 2‐ 4 pm    Best regards   Anne La  986 Colonial Ln Palo Alto  1 Brettle, Jessica From:holzemer/hernandez <holz@sonic.net> Sent:Monday, December 2, 2019 6:34 PM To:Council, City Subject:Support for Several City Council Items Tonight CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.  Council Members,  I encourage you to consider supporting three key items that directly affect our City.  Item #1 ‐‐ An independent, through investigation of the City's Planning and Transportation Commission's Vice Chairman, Michael  Alcheck and his ethical behaviors over the past several years. I believe that Mr. Alcheck deserves a fair and honest hearing, but he  should not continue to serve on the PTC if the City's own major ethical standards of proper behavior have been violated. I believe  you, as our Council representatives and bearers of our City's ethical standards, should take a serious look at this issue and have an  independent investigation of these matters. There is no excuse to delay or not to do this investigation.  Item #2 ‐‐ Please support Item #8 on tonight's Consent Calendar. I serve on the NVCAP Working Group and support the City staff's  effort to modify and change the Perkins + Will consultant's contract with the City.  Item #3 ‐‐ Lastly, I would like to indicate my whole‐hearted support for a Palo Alto business tax. This tax is long overdue as  businesses, which are causing increased traffic congestion and pollution to our neighborhoods, are the ones who are chiefly  responsible for the daily loss of our neighborhood's quality of life. I believe that small, neighborhood‐serviing businesses should be  given special consideration, however, the larger (20+ employees) businesses should "pay their fair share". Again, it's long overdue. A  "head" tax would be best.  Sincerely,  Terry Holzemer  2581 Park Blvd. #Y211  Palo Alto, CA 94306    1 Brettle, Jessica From:Elan Loeb <elanloeb@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, December 3, 2019 7:30 PM To:Council, City Subject:Tenant protection act CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.  Hi! I wanted to voice my support for renters rights & prevention of rent hikes! Affordable and fair housing is a huge  concern for our city & I'm glad to see the city council putting energy towards it.    Elana Loeb  3746 la calle ct  Palo Alto, CA   1 Brettle, Jessica From:chuck jagoda <chuckjagoda1@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, December 3, 2019 8:36 PM To:WILPF Peninsula Palo Alto Subject:The answer! CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.  So obvious! All it takes is to stop worrying about the other guy paying his share and dig a little deeper to help him make that payment. Easier for some to do than others. https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2019/jun/03/its‐a‐miracle‐helsinkis‐radical‐solution‐to‐homelessness    Chuck  1 Brettle, Jessica From:Mark Cox <markdarrellcox@icloud.com> Sent:Tuesday, December 3, 2019 9:26 PM To:jd@howardstern.com Cc:MediaInquiries@kushner.com Subject:The Cross (i) CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on  links.  ________________________________    So the Messiah was on the Cross for what? Was it Six Solar Sun Hours? Just One Guy. Six Hours. One Day. Voluntary. Was  this Commentary? Is this what we do? Do we rely on Patience in Times of Trouble? Is our God Patience? In God We  Trust? Have Patience with the Teller in the Bank? "I'm sorry Sir. You don't have any money." How long do you have to  wait for Patience to Deliver? Is this because you Fear God? You don't want to upset Patience so you don't ask for  anything. You're gonna let everyone around you suffer in Patience because you Trust God? That's why you don't say  anything. "Don't say HaShem. You have to learn to respect Patience." "What about the Day of Judgement?"    "Yhawuøòwah Elohim. Let Light be upon my Path. Likewise for the Feet of the World."    "Light be on my Path according to the Will of Elohim." Jacob's Ladder is the Light? What Scripture did Jacob have? What  did Jacob teach his Children? What about Avraám? What did Avraám have? Where did Avraám get his Enlightenment  from?        1 Brettle, Jessica From:Mark Cox <markdarrellcox@icloud.com> Sent:Thursday, November 28, 2019 11:01 PM To:jd@howardstern.com Cc:MediaInquiries@kushner.com Subject:Twin Peaks CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on  links.  ________________________________    Did Jeff Laird have a Twin that Jeff Laird did Not know of. And if Jeff "Comes Back" would this be the Jeff or the Twin?  Likewise John Lennon. "Well now that the Twin is Older then we can Switch Out because no one will expect him to Sing  Well in his Advanced Years. Who do they covet among Children? Twins. What do they get for it? Switch‐Ability. Just like  Batteries. Well this Cop is Talented. Let him finish. When he's done we'll replace him with the Bad Cop to have a Fully  Charged Battery."  1 Brettle, Jessica From:Christine Selberg <christineselberg@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, November 29, 2019 2:54 PM To:Council, City; ARB@citypaloalto.org Subject:Appeal to deny Verizon Cell Towers in Downtown Neighborhood CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Be cautious of opening attachments and clicking on links.  Dear Mayor Filseth, Vice-Mayor Fine, Ms. Cormack, Mr. DuBois, Ms. Kniss, Ms. Kou and Mr. Tanaka, I was very pleased when, in October, City Planning Director Jonathan Lait denied approval to the six cell towers Verizon has applied to install on utility poles in the Downtown North neighborhood. In doing so, he took note of both design and siting inadequacies, and found—as did the Architectural Review Board —that what Verizon has proposed is “not architecturally compatible with the existing sites.” He is right! The ugly towers Verizon proposed have not place in any Palo Alto neighborhood. It is my understanding that Verizon has appealed Mr. Lait’s decision. I am writing to you to ask you to deny that appeal. It’s time for Verizon to start designing cell towers and choosing cell tower locations that meet our City’s aesthetic standards. And, as the Architectural Review Board has repeatedly told this company, slapping hundreds of pounds of unsightly equipment on utility poles in residential areas does not meet our standards. Please deny Verizon’s appeal. Any please tell Verizon that your strong preference, as you expressed in unanimously approving Mr. DuBois’s April 15th amendment, is for underground ancillary equipment and for siting that is respectful of the character of our beautiful neighborhoods. Sincerely, Christine Selberg 281 Everett Ave., Downtown North neighborhood Palo Alto, CA 94301 Purpose Statement for City School Liaison Committee -DRAFT The Committee meetings are the only times when members of PAUSD Board and City Council come together officially and on a regular basis. It provides a unique opportunity for the elected representatives and associated staff to: • Establish stronger relations between and among elected and staff across separate jurisdictions operating in the same community • Gain understanding of perspectives, opportunities, constraints of both PAUSD and City • Share current actions and activities • Raise and share current and ongoing issues of mutual interest o Examples: proposed state legislation (SB-50, AB-1487, ACA-1 and others), Stanford GUP, grade separations, etc. • Have potential to solve issues and/or devise means to prevent issues from arising in the future. o Example: the creation of a new procedure for reviewing projects that impact both City and P AUSD ptop~rties such as the solar projects in 2018 (Can staff please provide the final I proposed review process to the Committee?) • Work together on community projects o Examples: 125th Anniversary celebrations, May Pete Parade, etc. fli ~.!:/mNG .~ ll/-z. t /z.O I~ '~ [ ] Placed Before Meeting .:-r)k'Received at Meeting l Purpose Statement for City School Liaison Committee -DRAFT with proposed revisions c11.21.19> The City of Palo Alto and the Palo Alto Unified School District (PAUSD) have a shared interest in the health, safety, and welfare of students and families in the Palo Alto community. The following is the purpose statement for the City School Liaison Committee, adopted on Purpose: The Committee meetings serve as a time for are the only times when members of PAUSD Board Members and City of Palo Alto City Council Members to officially come together officially and on a regular basis. It provides a unique opportunity for the elected representatives and associated staff to: • Establish stronger relations between and among elected and staff across separate jurisdictions operating in the same community • Gain understanding of perspectives, opportunities, constraints of beth P AUSD_,_ and the City, and private and independent schools in the community • Share current actions and activities • Raise and shareExplore current and ongoing issues of mutual interest o Examples: proposed state legislation (SB 50, AB 1487, ACA. 1 and others), Stanford GUP, grade separations, etc. • Have potential to solveldentify issues and/or devise means to prevent issues from arising in the future-; o EKample: the creation of a nev,r procedure for reviewing projects that impact both City and PAUSD properties such as the solar projects in 2018 (Can staff please provide the final I proposed revie\Y process to the Committee?) • Work together on relevant community projects o Examples: 125tll Anniversary celebrations, ~4ay Fete Parade, etc. • Regularly communicate to both bodies ~~cl\IJ4/ .-ILMEmNG tc \ \ /1.-l/1/} I q ~. [ ] Placed Before M~eting k,{-..: t)d-Received at Meeung -1 SAN MATEO COUNTY SILICON VALLEY The best of the Son Francisco Bay Arec1 December 2, 2019 Convention and Visitors Bureau 111 Anza Boulevard, Suite 41 O, Burlingame, CA 94010 650-348-7600 • 1-800-288-4748 Fax 650-348-7687 www.visitsmcsv.com COUNZ~EETING ;;i.,:eJ? [ ] Placed Before Meeting [ -ri{eceived at Meeting Dear Mayor Filseth and Members of the Palo Alto City Council, The Palo Alto Hotel Council issue started well before I took over the duties as CEO of the Bureau on June 3. Since then, I have conducted numerous one-on-one meetings with Palo Alto hotel members; enrolled in Leadership Palo Alto; and been supportive of our community partner, the Palo Alto Chamber of Commerce. I have leaned-in in a big way listening to these concerns and worked tirelessly to make changes based on the feedback received. I was taught that feedback -positive or negative -is a gift. One area where improvement was needed was communication. The PowerPoint presentation we prepared for Palo Alto Hotels has now become a baseline tool by making similar presentations in other communities we serve. We are now taking this information to the next step by creating a reader friendly annual report which we will present at our annual luncheon meeting on January 31, 2020. Much of the information in this deck was always available but not in a format that was easily understandable. Metrics are a key for measuring any organization's effectiveness. I have taken the Bureau in a new direction as it relates to implementing tech to measure our results. We recently engaged Palo Alto-based Adara to track our web traffic. By the end of January 2020 we will have data and know where and how visitors from our site ended up booking their hotel rooms, and we'll be able to report that out accordingly. We now know that the phrase "Silicon Valley" is searched on average 201,000 times/month; ''Palo Alto" 91,000 times/month. We are deploying tech to better understand consumer behavior, which will give us better insight to convert searches into revenue for our members. Marketing our destination, soliciting exposure via travel writers and direct sales for Groups and International Travelers will always be a key focus for us. On January 10, 2020 we will host a Director of Sales Forum -an interactive session with Hotel Sales Directors and our staff which will allow us to exchange information on what initiatives we are working on and, more importantly, what initiatives our members would like us to work on. As a Destination Marketing Organization, we have a wide array of tools available to us -we need more member input to know which lever to pull when. My ask of you this evening is that you please renew the TBID and allow me more time to further engage Palo Alto hotels, resolve any remaining differences and report back to you our progress. Sincerely, l co;~l!~ ,7EETING ( ] P~ Before Meeting ( ...yt{eceived at Meeting . Palo Alto Jordan Middle D 0 School ca11tornla Avenue Train Station - •••• ---- Palo Alto Veteran's Hospital+ Existing 88 Existing 88L Existing 88M New288A New288B 0of ··· e,'lJ..• •• •• s ltos Transit Services ..., ....... C.m1r.:-~ ••••••• !:.:.a:i:fudJot<er,ftftl"• Landmarks IR ,.t'.;;-<"; .. t.·,t<a: Ill l-ti.;ir~ , -... P•l:;;:...•-. .,. -I (vy9,.,::1 .f.:t • -'ft.c..a..:~?.~~ -S;1·mif<1r:,?<.:.i•n .. .Jff'l),.')l + ._,r«t • ::ui.-u:~A!"riKt,:r. ftt~Go.-.r:.,'••»" I • '\ ~~ '-:;.. . : / -·.:. ·:::::::.)":__>). ·-:_ •:: ... ,• ___ J I o :i.! -~ ...... o 41.TO South Palo Alto Shuttle service will start operating after the VTA implements the Next Network Concept Plan or the 2019 New Transit Service Plan. C. Service Increases and Reductions CITY reserves the right to increase, reduce, or modify shuttle service as CITY may find necessary or appropriate in response to changes in ridership or CITY's annual budget. Any additions shall be compensated at the hourly rates agreed upon by Contractor and CITY. Each year the schedule for existing Special School Service will be modified for summer months when schools are closed. This is to accommodate the summer school schedule of the two middle schools on the route. CITY will give Contractor at least thirty (30) days' notice for shuttle service changes such as adding, deleting or modifying service. The contractor will be expected to acquire any additional vehicles as well as hiring and training new personnel necessary for providing modified Palo Alto School Shuttle service. If Contractor requires additional time beyond 30-days to acquire the necessary vehicles and personnel, Contractor must contact CITY in writing within five (5) business days of receipt of CITY's written request for the modified or expanded service. Contractor and CITY must then mutually agree on a new date for fulfilling CITY's request to add service, however, under no circumstances shall that date be more than 75 days from the date of City's written request for additional service. The contractor may elect to provide the requested service change in less than 30-days if they are able and CITY agrees. The contractor must maintain sufficient staffing of bus operators to operate all routes at all times. SECTION 2: DELIVERABLES A. Vehicle Requirements: Contractor shall provide a sufficient number of buses that seat a minimum of twenty-five (25) riders each, including at least one dedicated spare bus to be used as a stand-by vehicle. Contractor shall also have the capability to provide additional vehicles for any service expansion requested by CITY at a later date. All vehicles used on the Palo Alto shuttle route must first be approved and accepted by CITY before placed in service. Additionally, Contractor is responsible for ensuring that all Palo Alto Shuttle vehicles meet the applicable California Air Resources Board (CARB) and Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) air emissions standards for public transit fleets at all times.