HomeMy Public PortalAbout1980, 12-01DE
C
1
9
8
0
<--------------
Council Rejects
Housing Assistonce
For Low Income
Seniors/Families
L_________
After a lengthy and some
times confusing discussion,
the Fullerton City Council
has voted to discontinue
its support for and parti
cipation in the Federal
rent-subsidy program known
as Section-8 .
Actually their action,
taken during the recent
Housing Element public
hearing, may not have much
effect on current Fullerton
beneficiaries of the pro
gram.
According to an Orange
Continued on p. 5
FULLERTON
OBSERVER
EXCLUSIVELY REPORTING FULLERTON NEWS
NO. 5 DECEMBER. 1980
Rancho Fullerton in Southwest Fullerton reclassified as
Low-Medium Density Residentiaj^Jby the_PlmnjuigjC^^issi^n_.
Mobil Homes Protected
Citizens Protest
Committee Consolidation
Council Advisors Request Time for Public Input
Bowing to an overwhelming
and unanimous show of citi
zen displeasure, the Fuller
ton City Council has post
poned action on a proposed
consolidation of several
City Commissions, Commit
tees, and Task Forces.
The proposed restructur
ing of the City's volunteer
bodies was made by an Ad-
Hoc Committee consisting of
City Manager Bill Winter,
Community Services Director
Ron Hagan, and Councilwomen
Sue Tsuda and Linda LeQuire.
By an earlier decision of
this committee, no public
input on the proposal was
sought, nor was any re
ceived.
The apparent plan was to
receive public input at the
Council Meeting, and then
as Mayor Bornhoft put it,
"Bite the bullet and ap
prove the recommendation."
Councilwoman Tsuda had
not attended the last Ad-
Hoc Committee Meeting, and
indicated that although she
supported the Committee's
recommendations, she was
concerned with the precipi
tous way in which it was
proposed they be imple
mented.
Perhaps the most contro
versial of the proposed
consolidations was that
which would create a J mem
ber Community Services Com-
Continued on p. 5
Young Homeowners
Beat City Hall
A group of young homeown
ers petitioned their local
government for help in im
proving their neighborhood
in Southwest Fullerton, and
they won!
The Fullerton Planning
Commission responded to the
testimony of 5 young home-
owners from an older neigh
borhood bounded by Common
wealth, Magnolia, Valencia,
and Edwards Avenues, by re
versing a City Staff recom-
Continued on p. 5
The Fullerton Planning
Commission has taken the
first step towards protect
ing three Fullerton Mobile
Home Parks from possible
future conversions to other
uses.
All three parks had been
carrying General Plan use
designations, which permit
ted other so-called higher
uses, e.g.. Commercial, In
dustrial, or Medium Density
Residential.
Rancho Fullerton, Magnolia
City Skips
McColl Hearing
Two of the main charact
ers in the McColl Dump Saga,
the City of Fullerton and
the present owner of the
Dump, were noticeably ab
sent from the all dayjpub-
lic hearing held by the
State at Buena Park High
School.
The Dump owner, David
Hengstler, did not attend;
although an employee of his
Rampart Research and Finan
cial Corporation was sur
reptitiously there.
The City of Fullerton al
so declined to officially
attend, submitting instead
a written statement by City
Attorney R.K. Fox, which
said in part, "We regret
that because of statements
made by certain State of
ficials, in total absence
of a factual finding of the
existence of a health haz-
(
The Fullerton Observer
118 W. Brookdale Place
Fullerton, Calif.92632
Ms, Florence James
353 West Commonwealth Avenue
Fullerton, CA 92632
Bulk Rate
U.S. Postage
PAID
Permit # 1577
Fullerton, Ca.
Lane, and Fullerton West Mo
bile Home Parks were all
changed to the Low-Medium «.
Density category.
An interesting side note
to these changes was that
not a single mobile home
owner/resident testified on
this issue of such poten
tially major importance to
them.
The next step, assuming
that the City Council con
firms the Planning Commis
sion »- -tions in early De-
: IS, 8
Carol and Sheila Affeld pro-
test Eli McColl's Toxic Dump.
ard, the magnitude of the
problem of the McColl site
has been exaggerated and
needless hardship has been
visited upon the landowners
and reside^s.: of the sur
rounding area." continued on p. 2
/ —
p.u
MORE INSIDE A
Culture and Fine Arts
P.5 Tax Exempt Bonds
p .6 110 Building
Rejuvenation
P.T Fullerton Bikeways
p .8 Continued Learning
Experience
Courtesy of Local History Room, Fullerton Public Library
age 2
McColl Dumn Declared Public
Continued from p. |
Congressman Dannemeyer at recent McColl Hearing. He recom
mended that City sue dump owner to abate public nuisance.
The Observer was unable
to find anyone at the hear
ing (attendance ranged from
300 to 500 as the hearing
progressed), who agreed
with this analysis of the
McColl Dump situation.
All the State officials
studiously avoided stating
that a significant health
hazard existed. Nor would
anyone state ;c^egorically
that no health hazards
were posed by the toxic
waste site.
Congressman William Dan
nemeyer, although careful
to disclaim any criticism
of Fullerton's past actions,
stated that, based on a
survey of residents near
the McColl site, performed
by his Staff, he was con
vinced that the Dump con
stituted a public nuisance
as defined by California
.Health and Safety Code Sec
tion 1+1700.
He recommended that, "The
.State should take the lead,
with Orange County and Ful
lerton as co-plaintiffs, in
suing the owners of the
property to force them to
take whatever actions are
necessary to abate the nui
sance."
The McColl Dump Committee,
made up of nearby homeown
ers , were not so tolerant
of "the City's inactions to
date."
They requested that the
wastes be removed, and that
the City pay them for the
costs of temporarily relo
cating themselves during
the evacuation period.
Thjs, of course, assumes
that the toxic wastes will
eventually have to be re
moved from the McColl Dump.
Although this seemed to
be the most popular solu
tion to the nuisance and
possible health hazards
posed by the Dump, no one
seemed sure where the wastes
could be transferred to, or
who would pay for it.
A press release by the
State Air Resources Board
(ARB)' seemed to downplay
the potential health hazard
of the McColl Dump.
"Odors emitted from the
McColl Dump in Fullerton
may be a nuisance to nearby
residents but do not contain
health-threatening concen
trations of toxic substances
according to over 5500 an
alyses of air monitoring
samples from the State Air
Resources Board and the
South Coast Air Quality Man
agement District."
Despite this optimistic
progress report, however,
Peter Weiner, Special As
sistant to Governor Brown
for Toxic Substance Control,
confided to this reporter
that there were several un
answered questions re the
Dump's effects.
"Even though the 2b hour
average toxic substance con
centrations were not signif
icant, short term episodes
of higher concentrations
might still pose some health
hazards," he said.
Dr. Raymond Neutra of the
California Department of
Health Services reported
Nuisance
that, "Unlike Love Canal,
we found none of the chlor
inated hydrocarbons such as
pesticides or PCB's. Nor is
there any reason to believe
that the Dump has affected
the water table."
Despite this favorable re
port , though, more studies
are planned to determine
the toxic constituents of
the lower depths of the
Dump (only the top two feet
have so far been probed),
and the degree to which
these wastes are migrating
out from the Dump.
Jane Fonda arrived at the
hearing at about b p.m. and
remained for the rest of the
session.
She addressed a rally out
side the Hearing Room, com
mending the McColl Dump Com
mittee for standing up for
their rights and urging all
Americans to join in the
fight against toxic wastes.
Ms. Fonda reported that
she will soon produce a
movie dealing with the tox
ic waste issue.
"I know you're worried
about your investments in
your homes, but your health
is even more important.
This problem is bigger than
just the McColl Dump or the
Love Canal. If you don't
stand up and fight now,
soon there will no place
to escape to," she said.
Courtesy of Local History Room, Fullerton Public Library
" I • • Page 3Proposed Commissions
Consolidation I nadvisable
Why Has Council
Decried Objectives?
It is perhaps understand
able why City Staff, who are
responsible for implementing
City Policies, would just as
soon not be held accountable
by measurable General Plan
Objectives.
Most of us would rather be
free to do our best, without
the additional anxiety of
having ou» results measured
against performance, sched
ule and cost criteria.
But why would the policy
makers themselves, the City
Council, so easily toss away
of replacement or re
habilitation by 80 units
per year."
The clear difference is
that in one case there is no
way of measuring whether
this City Objective has been
met; while in the other a
realistic target has been
set and a schedule for ac
complishment established.
And there is little valid
ity in the criticism that by
approving such quantified
objectives the City will be
come locked into a level ofthis excellent management
tool for maintaining account- performance which future
ability?
I think it becomes more
clear why, when we compare
two alternative General Plan
Objectives, considered dur
ing the City's most recent
General Plan reviews.
Objective 1 (as now in
cluded in the City's
Draft Housing Element):
"Decrease the number of
residential units in the
City in need of replace
ment or rehabilitation."
Alternative Objective 1
(as proposed by the
Housing Element Work
shop Minority and later
rejected): "Decrease
the number of resi
dential units in the
City which are in need
circumstances may make un
realistic.
These objectives are for
self-regulation; there is
no penalty for falling short, mediocre product we can ex-
And furthermore, all Ele- pect, if the Proposal's
A proposal calling for
substantial consolidation
of the Fullerton City Coun
cil's many and varied ad
visory groups was unveiled
at the November 18 Council
meeting.
The proposed realignment
of these citizen groups to
coincide with the key Ele
ments of the City's General.
Plan is commendable.
In this way, we can ex
pect that the relationships
between the policies con
tained in such General Plan
Elements as Housing, Re
source Management, and Com
munity Services, and what
is actually being imple
mented by the various City
Departments will become
more visible and meaningful.
Despite this favorable a-
lignment, however, the re
mainder of the proposal
suffers from the same lack
of citizen participation
which afflicted its author
ing ad-hoc committee.
The consolidation propos
al was the work of two Coun—
cilpeople and two members
of the City's Staff.
It was then reviewed by
Staff members who currently
service the different ad
visory groups.
No input was sought, nor
was any received, from Ful
lerton citizens.
The result is representa
tive of the same kind of
ments of the General Plan
can be revised as often as
the City Council desires,
thus providing a means for
adjusting up or down any
objective which does become
unrealistic.
Either the current City
Council is seriously lacking
in knowledge and experience
of the policy-making/imple-
menting process, or they sim- hours vill te'lost ifthis
ply do not want the City per- proposal is adopted,
forming in such areas as Thus, the services of ex
cusing, Resources Management,isting citizen-volunteers
Land Use, Community Services, is costing the city about
Health/Safety, and Transport- $2 per hour| a bargain in_
for facilitating citizeli
input.
But the proposed consoli
dation will only be more ef
ficient.
It will make the City
Council less accessible to
citizen input, by creating
Super Advisory Group bottle
necks through which citizens
will eventually tire of try
ing to force their ideas.
The creative tension be
tween citizens and staff,
and the careful considera-
tion of implementation pro
grams which now exists, will
be replaced with a hurry-up
process whereby Staff Pro
posals are rubber-stamped by
a thinly-stretched remnant
of citizen-advisors.
This will result in pro- 1
gram and other recommenda
tions coming to the City
Council which are largely de
void of the invaluable honing
heretofore provided by a
great breadth of unique citi
zen perspectives and exper
tise.
The consolidation proposal
will be coming back to the
Council on December l6th for
action, along with the com
ments of the existing advis
ory groups.
If the Council has the wis
dom to heed the recommenda
tions of these citizens, we
are sure that a much improved
Commission realignment will
be the result.
recommendations are approv
ed by the City Council.
The Plan proposes a Re
duction in the number of
existing advisory groups by
6 , and of total citizen-ad-
visors by 52 , for a total
estimated cost savings of
$10,000.
I would estimate that
about 5000 citizen volunteer
ation; or both.
Important December Events
When? What? Where?
12/2 1+ p.m. Sports Complex RFP Hearing City Council
12/2 7:30 p.m. Gen. Plan/LUE Revision City Council
12/9-2/8/81
12/16 7:30 p.m.
Museum of North
Orange County
Castles & Fairy Tales
Exhibit
Advisory Group Consolida- City Council
tion Hearing
deed, even if that were the
only consideration.
Furthermore, as one citi
zen observed, there is no
proof that this amount of
money will actually be
saved; since no budget or
Staff reductions have been
suggested.
The report promises a
more efficient, accessible,
and understandable vehicle
F U L L E R T O N
O B S E R V E R
EXCLUSIVELY REPORTING FULLERTON NEWS
Published monthly except July
and August by Fullerton Citizens
for a Livable Community.
Subscriptions are $2/year.
Editor: Ralph Kennedy
Production:
Kennedy, M
Barbara John
Bill Gann, Rusty
:uj;a Hiegel, and
n.
Graphics: Claudia Miller
Mary Ann McDonnell.
and
Circulation: Richard Schrank,
Roy Kobayashi, Roberta Regan.
Observers: Doris Stasse, Bill
McDonnell, Bonnie Ellis, David
Narevsky, Rich Mahoney, Nadene
Ivens, and Bob Ward.
Photography:
Joe Trindl.
Bill Gann and
Courtesy of Local History Room, Fullerton Public Library
page 4
^uCCe/tton '-Discoie/tecf (-Q.ich in CuHtu/ig c Anc( cfrne (_A/tts
Initial plans were made
to lobby the City Council
to retain CETA support for
Fullerton non-profit organ
izations, to reinstate the
Brea Dam Amphitheater Pro
ject in the City's Five
Year Capital Improvements
Program, and to assure the
continued high priority of
the Muckenthaler Cultural '
Center Restoration Project
in that document.
here Would
Without Culture
"Picture our community
without the Arts. Imagine no
theater. No music. No sculp
ture or painting. Picture
the Arts gone and you pic
ture a lot of beauty missing."
These were the thoughts
suggested to attendees of
the 1980 State of the Arts
Conference by the Sponsoring
Orange County Arts Alliance.
The Conference materials
went on with a more material
istic appeal.
"But the Arts not
ate beauty, they create jobs.
Because the Arts attract
tourists, and the dollars
tourists spend in restaurants,
hotels, and stores.
Plummer Auditorium (above)
is not only an architectural
treasure but a haven for the
performing arts. Below is
one of the many murals in
the Maple Area that cultur
ally enrich our City.
Photos by Rj_Kennedy.______
Fullerton Be
and Fine Arts?
The Arts also attract in
dustry. Businesses prefer
to locate in communities
with a rich cultural life.
And the Arts are an indus-
try in themselves. Like any
other industry, they employ
people, buy goods and ser
vices, and pay taxes.
Picture our community
without the Arts, then, and
you have to imagine indus
try and jobs gone too.
And after that the people.
too."
These ideas were discussed
by the Fullerton Cultural
and Fine Arts Commission at
their November meeting.
Commissioners seemed to
agree with their Chairman,
Preston Stedman, that if
such an esthetically sterile
Fullerton is to be prevented,
the Commission and all of
its members will have to
undertake a serious cam
paign to:
1) Increase awareness of
the Arts by all Fullerton
residents,
2) Educate the City de
cision makers on the many
values which an effective
Arts program can provide,
and
3) Aggressively seek out
side funds to supplement
those provided by the
City.
"Flight" (above) graces City
Hall. The Museum of North
Orange County makes Fullerton
a better place to live.
Pictured are the Muckenthaler
Cultural Center (above), Ste
ven Peck's dance studio (lower
left) and a sculpture on Ful
lerton College's Quad.
Courtesy of Local History Room, Fullerton Public Library
Housing Help Continues Despite City Action
Continued from p. 1 '
County Housing Authority
(OCHA) spokesperson, tenants
and landlords may continue
to participate in the pro
gram, despite the actions
of any City Council.
Shared Senior
Housing Supported
During a recent discus
sion of the Fullerton Hous
ing Element, the City Coun
cil unanimously agreed that
the City should encourage
"shared housing" for sen
iors.
During the same meeting,
the Council attempted to
find ways in which shared
housing for young people,
mostly presumed to he stu
dents , could more effect
ively he regulated.
Discretionary approval is
required for sororities and
fraternities, hut no way to
legally control the shared
use of a home by several
adults remains.
Until a California Super
ior Court declared such re
strictions to he unconstitu
tional, Fullerton did have
an Ordinance which limited
the number of unrelated in
dividuals occupying a sin
gle family residence to
four.
HOMEOWNERS
VICTORIOUS
Continued from p. 1
mendation that this neigh
borhood's land use designa
tion be raised from Low
Density Residential to Low-
Medium Density Residential.
The residents opposed the
higher density classifica
tion because they believed
it would attract more traf
fic and parking to a neigh
borhood already beset by
these same problems.
Commissioner Gatlin, in
supporting the citizens'
request, said, "I was much
impressed with the degree
to which the young people
in that area have been up
grading their neighborhood."
Mr. Chet Schultz, the
only dissenting Planning
Commissioner, favored the
Medium Density classifica
tion; since it would have
the effect of enabling
needed expansion in the
City's housing stock.
187 Fullerton low/moder-
ate income senior and 307
Fullerton low/moderate in
come family households are
currently receiving assist
ance from the OCHA, accord
ing to the Authority's lat
est monthly report.
79 percent of these house
holds have "very low" in
comes per this report. This
means that their incomes
are less than half the Coun
ty's median income.
Councilpeople Tsuda and
Winters favored retention of
this program in the Housing
Element, while Councilmen
Ackerman and Bomhoft fa
vored deletion.
Councilwoman LeQuire op
posed family subsidies, but
favored those for seniors.
In the final vote she sid
ed with Ackerman and Born-
hoft for deletion of the
program.
City Staff warned that if
the City Council did not re
tain some of the proposed
housing programs, the State
would not accept the Re
vised Housing Element as
meeting the requirements of
the Roos Bill, recently en
acted by the California
legislature.
Councilman Ackerman re
plied that he felt it would
be all right for the City
to treat these requirements
as advisory, until such
time as the Bill had been
interpreted by the Courts.
Mayor Bornhoft agreed,
"Until this law is valida
ted by the Courts, you don't
know whether it is law or
it isn't."
Amerige Villa, Fullerton's only Section 8 Housing Complex
for Seniors across from the Main Library. Photo by Kennedy.
Commission Consolidation Decision Delayed
Continued from p. 1
mission from the 11 member
Human Relations, 7 member
Parks and Recreation, and
7 member Cultural and Fine
Arts Commissions.
Dr. Diane Foss, Chairper
son of the Human Relations
Commission, was particular
ly critical of the process
by which the proposed
changes had been arrived at
and were to be implemented.
"The fact that citizens
had no input into a deci
sion which affected them is
a moot point. The fact
that we were not given the
courtesy of an explanation
can only be construed as
an insult for the 5 years
of volunteer time and money
I have given to the City of
Fullerton."
Dr. Ross continued, "I
suggest to you that the
proposed Community Services
Commission will not be able
to effectively function for
at least one year, because
it will take that long for
them to understand the im
plications of the present
concerns and issues in the
U areas of consolidation."
"Since Council is not
charged to serve in this
function, it is my hope
that Council will be cog
nizant of the enormous pow
er it is granting to Staff
during the next year, and
will give assurance to the
public that this power
will not go unchecked."
Molly McClanahan, member
and former Chairperson of
the Human Relations Commis
sion, spoke in favor of the
inefficiencv of the exist
ing system and warned that,
"The current Commissions
provide an indispensable
forum for the consideration
and refinement of a wide
range of Staff programs and
ideas. "
"The resulting creative
tension between Staff and
citizens is healthy and in
valuable as an aid to bet
ter Council decisions," she
added.
Bill Blodgett, local busi
nessman, questioned the ar
guments which Staff had pre
sented to justify the pro
posed changes.
"The stated $10,000 per
year savings promised to re
sult from the proposed con
solidations represents less
than two tenths of one per
cent of the City's annual
budget."
"Furthermore, this can
only be considered a true
savings if the budget is al
so reduced by that amount.
The proposed changes do not
include any Staff or budget
reductions," he pointed out.
Dr. Edward Sowell, Chair
person of the recently
formed Energy Committee,
suggested that, "Since our
Committee was established
only 3 months ago, and has
a one year Sunset clause
built into it, why not let
us serve out our term with- .
out change?"
This Committee was slated
for combining with the Re
source Recovery Committee
to form an 11 member Engergy
and Resource Management Com
mittee.
The other major consolida
tion proposed was a 5 mem
ber Transportation and Cir
culation Commission to be
formed from the existing
Traffic and Parking Place
Commission, Bicycle Routes
Task Force, and Transporta
tion Commission.
The following membership
qualifications were pro
posed for this Commission:
"Each Commissioner shall
be a resident of or employed
in the City of Fullerton,
and shall be a person of
business experience and abil-
itZ., to insure that the af
fairs relating to the City's
parking districts, airport
operations, and transit
systems shall be admini
stered in the best inter
ests of those concerned,
and so that traffic, ve
hicle parking, airport
operations, and trans
portation systems be
regulated to best insure
the safety and welfare
of the public."
Courtesy of Local History Room, Fullerton Public Library
page 6 110 Rejuvenation Proceeds On
a m 1 a -P-? w o w «■? n f n P >’r\tn ■? + 4* r « . m o v o n ^ P-? w n l 1 » 4-^ a A — a.. . . 4 1 1Reasonable financing, suf
ficient parking, and proper
ty acquisition are apparent
ly the three keys to the
successful revitalization
of the Chapman Building in
from its present owner, and
then sell it to the new own
ers and redevelopers, The
110 Wilshire Building Part
ners , for the reduced price
of $50,000.
Finally, the Agency will
pay up to $182,000 of de
molition expenses for the
interior of the 110 Build
ing.
The total City contribu
tion to the project will be
about two million dollars.
In exchange for this pub
lic investment, the City ex
pects to get a revitalized
cornerstone to their down
town redevelopment, and sub
stantial associated new
property and sales tax rev
enues .
The private redeveloper's
contribution will be an ex
penditure of $2,857,000 in
building rehabilitation
costs, entailing a capital
investment of $250,000.
Upon completion, the 110
Building Partners will also
repay the City 30 percent
of the surplus receipts
from the Project during the
Schedule
first 15 years, estimated
to amount to about $325,000.
The Project will be fur
ther aided by below-market-
financing under provisions
of the Marks Bill, result
ing from the Building's
designation as an Histori
cal Landmark.
Efforts will be made to
secure high sales-tax-gen-
erating tenants for the
ground floor/mezzanine and
basement.
If the developers are suc
cessful in attracting a
restaurant for the basement,
a special rear entrance
will be built to accommo
date its customers.
F U L L E R T O N
OBSERVER
LUSIVELY REPORTING FULLERTON NEWS
1 18 W. BROOKDALE PL.
FULLERTON, CA 92632
downtown Fullerton, accord
ing to recent City Staff re
ports .
Since the establishment
of the downtown Redevelop
ment Project, revitalization
of the Chapman Building (or
110 Building as it is often
called) has been considered
essential to the overall
success of the Project.
The Fullerton Redevelop
ment Agency has agreed to
acquire the Chapman property
The Agency/City will also
develop the necessary off-
street parking on lots be
hind the building over to
Pomona Avenue.
This will involve acquir
ing these properties, relo
cating the current tenants
of the two houses now loca
ted there, demolishing the
houses, and building a
parking structure plus sur
face parking lot on the
cleared land.
T6LGPHON6 714/879-6230
CORNELL NORBY
Fine 19th 6-20th Century
W6ST6RN 6-AM6RICAN ART
305 NORTH HARBOR BOUL6VARD • STUDIO B 19
MAILING ADDRESS P.O.BOX 3908
FULL6RTON,CALIFORNIA 92634
CLIP OUT AND MAIL TO:
THE FULLERTON OBSERVER, 118 W. Brookdale, Fullerton 92632
□ I want to subscribe to The Observer. Enclosed is my check
for $2 for one year.
□ I would also like to support The Observer with the enclosed
additional contribution of $__________________
N A M E :____________________________________________________________________ ____________
TELEPH O N E N U M BER : _______________________________________________________________
AD DR ESS: _____________________________________________________________________________
The Observer is published monthly except July and August by Fullerton
Citizens for a Livable Community (FCLC) a local non-profit organization.
Artist's draw-
ings of reju
venated 110
Building. Wil
shire entrance
and new rear
entrance to
planned base
ment restaur
ant are shown
to the right.
Courtesy of Local History Room, Fullerton Public Library
Fullerton Implements Bikeways
The Fullerton Bicycle
Task Force has recommended
to the City Council imple
mentation of the following
additional bicycle routes
and signal modifications.
State SB-821 dollars,
which have already been al
located to Fullerton, will
be used to finance this ex
pansion of the City's exist
ing Bikeways.
Library Site Reclassified
The Planning Commission
has unanimously approved a
General Plan Change, which
changes the land use desig
nation on a one acre parcel
of land adjacent to Troy
High School from Public to
Low Density Residential.
The Commission thus fol
lowed the recommendations
of Staff and of the East
Fullerton Homeowners Asso
ciation.
fir. Jack Wuerth repre
sented the Association and
requested the low density
classification, which he
said would be more compat
ible with the surrounding
single family residence
neighborhood.
When asked by Commission
er Catlin, how many members
were currently in the Asso
ciation, Mr. Wuerth was not
sure; but then remarked.
"We won't find out how many
members we have unless we
have to get organized."
Carol Gordon, Chairperson
of the City's Community De
velopment Citizens Commit
tee (CDCC), asked for a
Low-Medium Density designa
tion, which she said would
permit the construction by
a private developer of some
low/moderate income housing
on the site.
The CDCC last month had
recommended to the City
Council that this parcel be
made available at a token
price to a private develop
er to build as many low
cost rental family units as
the R-2 zoning would have
permitted.
The R-2 zoning would have
allowed about 12 units; the
new low density classifica
tion will allow about 5.
1. Gilbert St. from Orange-
thorpe to Valencia, sign
ing only.
2. Brookhurst Rd. from
Orangethorpe to Valencia,
signing only.
3. Walnut Ave. from Rich-
man to Lemon, signing only.
b. Lemon St. from South
City Limit to Berkeley,
signing and signal modifi
cation.
5. Acacia Ave. from South
City Limit to Commonwealth,
signing and signal modifi
cation.
6. Bastanchury Rd. from As
sociated to E. City Limit,
signing, striping, and sig
nal modification.
7. Malvern from Bastanchury
to Basque, signing only.
8. Brea Blvd. from Harbor
to North City Limit, sign
ing only.
9. Rosecrans Ave. from Parks
Rd. to West City Limit,
signing and striping.
10. Parks Rd. from Bastan
chury to Rosecrans, sign
ing and striping.
11. Highland Ave. from Wal
nut to Wilshire, signing
only.
Housing Bonds Opposed
The City Council by a
vote of h to 1, with Coun-
cilwoman Tsuda dissenting,
voted to remove the tax-
exempt bond program from
the Revised Housing Element.
The sale of tax-exempt
bonds has been used recent
ly in La Habra and Orange
County to create a pool of
lower cost money for financ
ing affordable housing.
_____ Continued on p. 8
Our layaway plan will make this
their best Christmas ever.
Choose from our full line of Raleigh and
Rampar bicycles for kids and adults. Put
yours on layaway for Christmas today.
• All fully warranted
•All fully assembled.
• All meet or exceed the bicyde
construction standards set by
the Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
R A L E /(Z H
Raleigh Industries of America. Inc. *
SUNNY HILLS CYCLE
309 IM. Euclid Avenue
Fullerton, California 92633
(714) 871-0091
Courtesy of Local History Room, Fullerton Public Library
Page 8 Continued becoming £ypetdei\es>s Reckon
by Lynn Lawrence
People who regard retire
ment as a sequel to their
lives have developed an ex
citing program at Cal State
University, Fullerton.
It is formally known as
the Continuing Learning Ex
perience and affectionately
referred to by the acronym,
CLE.
This program, now in its
second year of successful
operation, was patterned
after the Institute for
Continued Learning at the
Council
Chamber
Heeds
Request
University of California, ed with a nucleus of 25 ded-
San Diego. icated people and has since
The Fullerton group stp^t— grown to the current enroll-
Tax Exempt
Bonds Dropped
Continued from p. 7
These lower cost funds
are then made available to
;developers of below-market-
irate housing at interest
rates substantially less
than tlje going rates.
The resulting savings in
developer-financing-costs
are then passed on to mod
erate income first-home
buyers, explained John Gib
son of the Orange County
Administrator's Office at
a recent meeting.____
' In refusing to consider
the use of tax-exempt bonds
as a desirable-means of en
abling the financing of af
fordable housing in Fuller
ton, the City Council has
rejected the recommendations
|of both the Citizens Hous-
(ing Element Workshop and
the City's Planning Commis
sion. _______
Pullerton Chamber of Com
merce representative. Bob
Andrews, spoke in opposi
tion to the program, which
ihe labelled as Just another;
form of housing subsidy.
CSUF's Mahr House on State College Blvd., site of success
ful new Continuing Learning Experience.
Mobil Home Parks
Continued from p. 1
cember, will be to change
the zoning on these 3 par
cels to be consistent with
the new land designations.
A Residential-Mobile Home
(R-MH) zoning will be re
quested.
On a 1+ to 2 vote, the
Commission denied a similar
proposed General Plan change
for the Purviance Mobile
Hom e Park, located behind
the Country Place Motel on
the south side of Orange-
thorpe, west of Brookhurst
Street.
Since this is an older
Park, which does not meet
current R-MH standards, sev
eral Commissioners expressed
concern with the mixed land
and zone designations which
a change in this Park's de
signation would entail.
Creative
Quality COMMERCIAL
& INSTANT PRINTING
OPEN SATURDAYS
ft* *
• BULLETINS
• BOOKLETS
• SCRATCH PADS
• PHOTOSTATS
• NEWS LETTERS
• RESUMES
• BROCHURES
• COLOR PRINTING
• ART & DESIGN
• TYPE SETTING
• LETTERHEADS
• ENVELOPES
113Vi E. Commonwealth Ave.
Fullerton, CA 92632
• FORMS
----------------------------------- • NCR SETS
Printing Service • flyers
(714)738-5876 • WEDDING INVITATIONS
RROWHEAD
HADES
LINDS
ment of 123.
The format and course con
tent are designed by the
members to meet their par
ticular interests and life
style.
Currently, Study Groups
include such diverse topics
as Financial Planning, Health
and Science, Art Apprecia
tion, Current Events and
Travel.
Rounding out the program j
are educational tours, spe
cial events and stimulating
discussions.
All activities are offered
during daytime hours and
none require homework or
regular attendance. Despite
the looseness of the struc
ture, a great percentage of
the membership attend regu
larly and enthusiastically.
Meeting place is Mahr
House, a lovely Spanish
style home on State College
Boulevard, and tuition is
$100 per person ($150 per
couple) making the program
self-sustaining.
CLE operates under a char
ter from Cal State Fullerton
and is supervised by the Of
fice of Extended Education.
Membership includes former
executives, teachers, librar
ians and other professionals-
bright, high-powered people
who use their considerable
talents and organizational
ability to make the group go.
This, plus a generous supply
of dedication, warmth and wit
provide incredibly wonderful
"vibes" as well as a smooth
running operation.
If you are lucky enough to
be retired (or semi-retired)
and interested in joining
forces with other people who
want to continue to learn,
you are ready for CLE.
A phone call to 773-21+1*6
any weekday morning will
bring you further information.
2 0 % O F F
o n
CUSTOM SHADES
(With This Ad)
OCT. THRU DEC. 23, 1980
134 West Wilshire Ave.
Fullerton, CA 92632
525-1725, 525-5216
Courtesy of Local History Room, Fullerton Public Library