Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAboutPKT-CC-2019-05-14MAY 14, 2019 PRE -COUNCIL WORKSHOP 12:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP 5:00 P.M. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING 7:00 P.M. City Council Chambers 217 East Center Street Moab, Utah 84532 Pre -Council Workshop Moab Area Parking Workshop Workshop Regarding Hydrologic and Hydrogeologic Assessment of the Surface Water and Groundwater Resources agenda summary workshop regarding hydrologic and hydrogeologic assessment of the surface water and groundwater resources.pdf attachment 1 - hydrologic and hydrogeologic assessment of the surface water and groundwater resources.pdf Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance Approval of Minutes April 22, 2019 - Special City Council Meeting 2019 -04 -22 mcc minutes draft.pdf April 23, 2019 - Regular City Council Meeting 2019 -04 -23 mcc minutes draft.pdf April 29, 2019 - Special City Council Meeting 2019 -04 -29 mcc minutes draft.pdf May 6, 2019 - Special City Council Meeting 2019 -05 -06 mcc minutes draft.pdf May 7, 2019 - Special City Council Meeting 2019 -05 -07 mcc minutes draft.pdf Mayor and Council Reports Administrative Reports Citizens to Be Heard Presentations Presentation of the Mayor's Student Citizenship of the Month Award for the Helen M. Knight School and the Moab Charter School for May, 2019 Proclamation: National Public Works Week Public Hearing (Approximately 7:15 p.m.) Emma Blvd Public Hearing agenda summary emma blvd public hearing 5 -6 -19.pdf attachment 1 -posted public notice.pdf attachment 2 -amended plat.pdf Public Hearing for the City of Moab ’s Fiscal Year 2019 -2020 Budget agenda summary sheet -fy20 budget public hearing.pdf attachment a -fy20 tentative budget.pdf Special Events Request for Amplified Music at Old City Park on August 23, 2019 agenda summary uriia macindoe birthday 2019.pdf city of moab mail - amplified music ocp 08 23 2019 uriia.pdf Approval of Special Event Permit and Special Use of City Park for a Fourth of July Celebration agenda summary sheet 4th july 2019.pdf 4th july at swanny.pdf Old Business Resolution 27 -2019 Parking Management Study agenda summary sheet - resolution 27 -2019 - parking management study.pdf attachment 1 - resolution 27 -2019.pdf attachment 2 - moab parking management study draft.pdf Ordinance 2019 -02: Amending the City of Moab Municipal Code by Adding a New Chapter 17.68 Planned Affordable Development (PAD) agenda summary sheet - ordinance 2019 -02 - planned affordable development (pad) - may 14.pdf ordinance 2019 -02 - planned afforable development (clean version).pdf ordinance 2019 -02 - planned affordable developments (legislative version).pdf New Business Award and Approval of the Ballpark Concessionaire Contract ballpark concessionaire agenda summary sheet.pdf concession rfp 2019.pdf concessionaire contract 2019.pdf ballpark concessionaire bid.pdf On -call Professional Engineering Services agenda summary sheet on -call professional engineering services.pdf attachment 1 - moab professional engineering services rfq.pdf UDOT Parking Structure Agreement agenda summary sheet udot parking structure agreement.pdf attachment 1 - resolution 33 -2019 authorizing signing the udot cooperative agreement submitted.pdf attachment 2 - cooprative agreement parking structure.pdf Resolution 32 -2019: A Resolution Approving a Hillside Development Permit for Legacy Design Group for Commercial Development on Property Located at 1520 North Main Street in the RC, Resort Commercial Zone, as Referred to City Council by the Planning Commission Briefing and possible action legacy design group agenda summary.pdf resolution 32 -2019 legacy design group hillside development permit.pdf chapter 17.55 code.pdf legacy design group hillside site layout with contours.pdf legacy design group hillside site layout with slope study.pdf legacy design group hillside slope study.pdf Resolution 31 -2019: A Resolution Conditionally Approving the Millcreek Corner Subdivision, a Minor Subdivision of 808 Millcreek Drive Located in the R -2, Residential Zoning District, as Referred to Council by the Planning Commission Briefing and possible action millcreek corner agenda summary.pdf resolution 31 -2019 millcreek corner subdivision.pdf millcreek corner subdivision final plat.pdf millcreek corner.pdf Ordinance 2019 -11: An Ordinance Modifying Moab Municipal Code Title 5, Chapter 5.67, Pertaining to Nightly Rentals - Discussion and possible action agenda summary sheet str.pdf proposed ordinance 2019-11.pdf chapter 5.67 legislative copy.pdf chapter 5.67 clean copy.pdf Approval of a Purchasing Exception for Rick's Glass for an Amount not to Exceed $105,000 for past MARC, Recreation, and Facilities Repairs and Potential Upgrades Necessary Through the End of this Fiscal Year purchasing exception agenda summary.pdf Ordinance 2019 -16: An Ordinance Authorizing Electronic Participation in City Council Meetings and Establishing Procedures for Electronic Participation - discussion and possible action agenda summary sheet -ordinance 2019 -16 -electronic participation in meetings.pdf ordinance 2019 -16 -electronic participation in meetings.pdf Approval of Bills Against the City of Moab Adjournment Special Accommodations: In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, individuals needing special accommodations during this meeting should notify the Recorder ’s Office at 217 East Center Street, Moab, Utah 84532; or phone (435) 259 -5121 at least three (3) working days prior to the meeting. Check our website for updates at: www.moabcity.org 1. 1.1.12:00 p.m. 1.2.5:00 p.m. Documents: 2. 3. 3.1. Documents: 3.2. Documents: 3.3. Documents: 3.4. Documents: 3.5. Documents: 4. 5. 6. 7. 7.1. 7.2. 8. 8.1. Documents: 8.2. Documents: 9. 9.1. Documents: 9.2. Documents: 10. 10.1. Documents: 10.2. Documents: 11. 11.1. Documents: 11.2. Documents: 11.3. Documents: 11.4. Documents: 11.5. Documents: 11.6. Documents: 11.7. Documents: 11.8. Documents: 12. 13. MAY 14, 2019PRE-COUNCIL WORKSHOP 12:00 P.M.CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP 5:00 P.M.REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING 7:00 P.M.City Council Chambers217 East Center StreetMoab, Utah 84532Pre-Council WorkshopMoab Area Parking WorkshopWorkshop Regarding Hydrologic and Hydrogeologic Assessment of the Surface Water and Groundwater Resourcesagenda summary workshop regarding hydrologic and hydrogeologic assessment of the surface water and groundwater resources.pdfattachment 1 - hydrologic and hydrogeologic assessment of the surface water and groundwater resources.pdfCall to Order and Pledge of AllegianceApproval of MinutesApril 22, 2019 - Special City Council Meeting2019-04 -22 mcc minutes draft.pdfApril 23, 2019 - Regular City Council Meeting2019-04 -23 mcc minutes draft.pdfApril 29, 2019 - Special City Council Meeting2019-04 -29 mcc minutes draft.pdf May 6, 2019 - Special City Council Meeting 2019 -05 -06 mcc minutes draft.pdf May 7, 2019 - Special City Council Meeting 2019 -05 -07 mcc minutes draft.pdf Mayor and Council Reports Administrative Reports Citizens to Be Heard Presentations Presentation of the Mayor's Student Citizenship of the Month Award for the Helen M. Knight School and the Moab Charter School for May, 2019 Proclamation: National Public Works Week Public Hearing (Approximately 7:15 p.m.) Emma Blvd Public Hearing agenda summary emma blvd public hearing 5 -6 -19.pdf attachment 1 -posted public notice.pdf attachment 2 -amended plat.pdf Public Hearing for the City of Moab ’s Fiscal Year 2019 -2020 Budget agenda summary sheet -fy20 budget public hearing.pdf attachment a -fy20 tentative budget.pdf Special Events Request for Amplified Music at Old City Park on August 23, 2019 agenda summary uriia macindoe birthday 2019.pdf city of moab mail - amplified music ocp 08 23 2019 uriia.pdf Approval of Special Event Permit and Special Use of City Park for a Fourth of July Celebration agenda summary sheet 4th july 2019.pdf 4th july at swanny.pdf Old Business Resolution 27 -2019 Parking Management Study agenda summary sheet - resolution 27 -2019 - parking management study.pdf attachment 1 - resolution 27 -2019.pdf attachment 2 - moab parking management study draft.pdf Ordinance 2019 -02: Amending the City of Moab Municipal Code by Adding a New Chapter 17.68 Planned Affordable Development (PAD) agenda summary sheet - ordinance 2019 -02 - planned affordable development (pad) - may 14.pdf ordinance 2019 -02 - planned afforable development (clean version).pdf ordinance 2019 -02 - planned affordable developments (legislative version).pdf New Business Award and Approval of the Ballpark Concessionaire Contract ballpark concessionaire agenda summary sheet.pdf concession rfp 2019.pdf concessionaire contract 2019.pdf ballpark concessionaire bid.pdf On -call Professional Engineering Services agenda summary sheet on -call professional engineering services.pdf attachment 1 - moab professional engineering services rfq.pdf UDOT Parking Structure Agreement agenda summary sheet udot parking structure agreement.pdf attachment 1 - resolution 33 -2019 authorizing signing the udot cooperative agreement submitted.pdf attachment 2 - cooprative agreement parking structure.pdf Resolution 32 -2019: A Resolution Approving a Hillside Development Permit for Legacy Design Group for Commercial Development on Property Located at 1520 North Main Street in the RC, Resort Commercial Zone, as Referred to City Council by the Planning Commission Briefing and possible action legacy design group agenda summary.pdf resolution 32 -2019 legacy design group hillside development permit.pdf chapter 17.55 code.pdf legacy design group hillside site layout with contours.pdf legacy design group hillside site layout with slope study.pdf legacy design group hillside slope study.pdf Resolution 31 -2019: A Resolution Conditionally Approving the Millcreek Corner Subdivision, a Minor Subdivision of 808 Millcreek Drive Located in the R -2, Residential Zoning District, as Referred to Council by the Planning Commission Briefing and possible action millcreek corner agenda summary.pdf resolution 31 -2019 millcreek corner subdivision.pdf millcreek corner subdivision final plat.pdf millcreek corner.pdf Ordinance 2019 -11: An Ordinance Modifying Moab Municipal Code Title 5, Chapter 5.67, Pertaining to Nightly Rentals - Discussion and possible action agenda summary sheet str.pdf proposed ordinance 2019-11.pdf chapter 5.67 legislative copy.pdf chapter 5.67 clean copy.pdf Approval of a Purchasing Exception for Rick's Glass for an Amount not to Exceed $105,000 for past MARC, Recreation, and Facilities Repairs and Potential Upgrades Necessary Through the End of this Fiscal Year purchasing exception agenda summary.pdf Ordinance 2019 -16: An Ordinance Authorizing Electronic Participation in City Council Meetings and Establishing Procedures for Electronic Participation - discussion and possible action agenda summary sheet -ordinance 2019 -16 -electronic participation in meetings.pdf ordinance 2019 -16 -electronic participation in meetings.pdf Approval of Bills Against the City of Moab Adjournment Special Accommodations: In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, individuals needing special accommodations during this meeting should notify the Recorder ’s Office at 217 East Center Street, Moab, Utah 84532; or phone (435) 259 -5121 at least three (3) working days prior to the meeting. Check our website for updates at: www.moabcity.org 1.1.1.12:00 p.m.1.2.5:00 p.m.Documents:2.3.3.1.Documents:3.2.Documents:3.3.Documents: 3.4. Documents: 3.5. Documents: 4. 5. 6. 7. 7.1. 7.2. 8. 8.1. Documents: 8.2. Documents: 9. 9.1. Documents: 9.2. Documents: 10. 10.1. Documents: 10.2. Documents: 11. 11.1. Documents: 11.2. Documents: 11.3. Documents: 11.4. Documents: 11.5. Documents: 11.6. Documents: 11.7. Documents: 11.8. Documents: 12. 13. MAY 14, 2019PRE-COUNCIL WORKSHOP 12:00 P.M.CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP 5:00 P.M.REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING 7:00 P.M.City Council Chambers217 East Center StreetMoab, Utah 84532Pre-Council WorkshopMoab Area Parking WorkshopWorkshop Regarding Hydrologic and Hydrogeologic Assessment of the Surface Water and Groundwater Resourcesagenda summary workshop regarding hydrologic and hydrogeologic assessment of the surface water and groundwater resources.pdfattachment 1 - hydrologic and hydrogeologic assessment of the surface water and groundwater resources.pdfCall to Order and Pledge of AllegianceApproval of MinutesApril 22, 2019 - Special City Council Meeting2019-04 -22 mcc minutes draft.pdfApril 23, 2019 - Regular City Council Meeting2019-04 -23 mcc minutes draft.pdfApril 29, 2019 - Special City Council Meeting2019-04 -29 mcc minutes draft.pdfMay 6, 2019 - Special City Council Meeting2019-05 -06 mcc minutes draft.pdfMay 7, 2019 - Special City Council Meeting2019-05 -07 mcc minutes draft.pdfMayor and Council ReportsAdministrative ReportsCitizens to Be HeardPresentationsPresentation of the Mayor's Student Citizenship of the Month Award for the Helen M. Knight School and the Moab Charter School for May, 2019Proclamation: National Public Works WeekPublic Hearing (Approximately 7:15 p.m.)Emma Blvd Public Hearingagenda summary emma blvd public hearing 5 -6 -19.pdfattachment 1 -posted public notice.pdfattachment 2 -amended plat.pdfPublic Hearing for the City of Moab ’s Fiscal Year 2019 -2020 Budgetagenda summary sheet -fy20 budget public hearing.pdfattachment a -fy20 tentative budget.pdfSpecial EventsRequest for Amplified Music at Old City Park on August 23, 2019 agenda summary uriia macindoe birthday 2019.pdfcity of moab mail - amplified music ocp 08 23 2019 uriia.pdfApproval of Special Event Permit and Special Use of City Park for a Fourth of July Celebration agenda summary sheet 4th july 2019.pdf4th july at swanny.pdfOld BusinessResolution 27 -2019 Parking Management Study agenda summary sheet - resolution 27 -2019 - parking management study.pdf attachment 1 - resolution 27 -2019.pdf attachment 2 - moab parking management study draft.pdf Ordinance 2019 -02: Amending the City of Moab Municipal Code by Adding a New Chapter 17.68 Planned Affordable Development (PAD) agenda summary sheet - ordinance 2019 -02 - planned affordable development (pad) - may 14.pdf ordinance 2019 -02 - planned afforable development (clean version).pdf ordinance 2019 -02 - planned affordable developments (legislative version).pdf New Business Award and Approval of the Ballpark Concessionaire Contract ballpark concessionaire agenda summary sheet.pdf concession rfp 2019.pdf concessionaire contract 2019.pdf ballpark concessionaire bid.pdf On -call Professional Engineering Services agenda summary sheet on -call professional engineering services.pdf attachment 1 - moab professional engineering services rfq.pdf UDOT Parking Structure Agreement agenda summary sheet udot parking structure agreement.pdf attachment 1 - resolution 33 -2019 authorizing signing the udot cooperative agreement submitted.pdf attachment 2 - cooprative agreement parking structure.pdf Resolution 32 -2019: A Resolution Approving a Hillside Development Permit for Legacy Design Group for Commercial Development on Property Located at 1520 North Main Street in the RC, Resort Commercial Zone, as Referred to City Council by the Planning Commission Briefing and possible action legacy design group agenda summary.pdf resolution 32 -2019 legacy design group hillside development permit.pdf chapter 17.55 code.pdf legacy design group hillside site layout with contours.pdf legacy design group hillside site layout with slope study.pdf legacy design group hillside slope study.pdf Resolution 31 -2019: A Resolution Conditionally Approving the Millcreek Corner Subdivision, a Minor Subdivision of 808 Millcreek Drive Located in the R -2, Residential Zoning District, as Referred to Council by the Planning Commission Briefing and possible action millcreek corner agenda summary.pdf resolution 31 -2019 millcreek corner subdivision.pdf millcreek corner subdivision final plat.pdf millcreek corner.pdf Ordinance 2019 -11: An Ordinance Modifying Moab Municipal Code Title 5, Chapter 5.67, Pertaining to Nightly Rentals - Discussion and possible action agenda summary sheet str.pdf proposed ordinance 2019-11.pdf chapter 5.67 legislative copy.pdf chapter 5.67 clean copy.pdf Approval of a Purchasing Exception for Rick's Glass for an Amount not to Exceed $105,000 for past MARC, Recreation, and Facilities Repairs and Potential Upgrades Necessary Through the End of this Fiscal Year purchasing exception agenda summary.pdf Ordinance 2019 -16: An Ordinance Authorizing Electronic Participation in City Council Meetings and Establishing Procedures for Electronic Participation - discussion and possible action agenda summary sheet -ordinance 2019 -16 -electronic participation in meetings.pdf ordinance 2019 -16 -electronic participation in meetings.pdf Approval of Bills Against the City of Moab Adjournment Special Accommodations: In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, individuals needing special accommodations during this meeting should notify the Recorder ’s Office at 217 East Center Street, Moab, Utah 84532; or phone (435) 259 -5121 at least three (3) working days prior to the meeting. Check our website for updates at: www.moabcity.org 1.1.1.12:00 p.m.1.2.5:00 p.m.Documents:2.3.3.1.Documents:3.2.Documents:3.3.Documents:3.4.Documents:3.5.Documents:4.5.6.7.7.1.7.2.8.8.1.Documents:8.2.Documents:9.9.1.Documents:9.2.Documents:10.10.1. Documents: 10.2. Documents: 11. 11.1. Documents: 11.2. Documents: 11.3. Documents: 11.4. Documents: 11.5. Documents: 11.6. Documents: 11.7. Documents: 11.8. Documents: 12. 13. MAY 14, 2019PRE-COUNCIL WORKSHOP 12:00 P.M.CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP 5:00 P.M.REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING 7:00 P.M.City Council Chambers217 East Center StreetMoab, Utah 84532Pre-Council WorkshopMoab Area Parking WorkshopWorkshop Regarding Hydrologic and Hydrogeologic Assessment of the Surface Water and Groundwater Resourcesagenda summary workshop regarding hydrologic and hydrogeologic assessment of the surface water and groundwater resources.pdfattachment 1 - hydrologic and hydrogeologic assessment of the surface water and groundwater resources.pdfCall to Order and Pledge of AllegianceApproval of MinutesApril 22, 2019 - Special City Council Meeting2019-04 -22 mcc minutes draft.pdfApril 23, 2019 - Regular City Council Meeting2019-04 -23 mcc minutes draft.pdfApril 29, 2019 - Special City Council Meeting2019-04 -29 mcc minutes draft.pdfMay 6, 2019 - Special City Council Meeting2019-05 -06 mcc minutes draft.pdfMay 7, 2019 - Special City Council Meeting2019-05 -07 mcc minutes draft.pdfMayor and Council ReportsAdministrative ReportsCitizens to Be HeardPresentationsPresentation of the Mayor's Student Citizenship of the Month Award for the Helen M. Knight School and the Moab Charter School for May, 2019Proclamation: National Public Works WeekPublic Hearing (Approximately 7:15 p.m.)Emma Blvd Public Hearingagenda summary emma blvd public hearing 5 -6 -19.pdfattachment 1 -posted public notice.pdfattachment 2 -amended plat.pdfPublic Hearing for the City of Moab ’s Fiscal Year 2019 -2020 Budgetagenda summary sheet -fy20 budget public hearing.pdfattachment a -fy20 tentative budget.pdfSpecial EventsRequest for Amplified Music at Old City Park on August 23, 2019 agenda summary uriia macindoe birthday 2019.pdfcity of moab mail - amplified music ocp 08 23 2019 uriia.pdfApproval of Special Event Permit and Special Use of City Park for a Fourth of July Celebration agenda summary sheet 4th july 2019.pdf4th july at swanny.pdfOld BusinessResolution 27 -2019 Parking Management Studyagenda summary sheet - resolution 27 -2019 - parking management study.pdfattachment 1 - resolution 27 -2019.pdfattachment 2 - moab parking management study draft.pdfOrdinance 2019 -02: Amending the City of Moab Municipal Code by Adding a New Chapter 17.68 Planned Affordable Development (PAD)agenda summary sheet - ordinance 2019 -02 - planned affordable development (pad) - may 14.pdfordinance 2019 -02 - planned afforable development (clean version).pdfordinance 2019 -02 - planned affordable developments (legislative version).pdfNew BusinessAward and Approval of the Ballpark Concessionaire Contractballpark concessionaire agenda summary sheet.pdfconcession rfp 2019.pdfconcessionaire contract 2019.pdfballpark concessionaire bid.pdfOn-call Professional Engineering Servicesagenda summary sheet on -call professional engineering services.pdfattachment 1 - moab professional engineering services rfq.pdfUDOT Parking Structure Agreementagenda summary sheet udot parking structure agreement.pdfattachment 1 - resolution 33 -2019 authorizing signing the udot cooperative agreement submitted.pdfattachment 2 - cooprative agreement parking structure.pdfResolution 32 -2019: A Resolution Approving a Hillside Development Permit for Legacy Design Group for Commercial Development on Property Located at 1520 North Main Street in the RC, Resort Commercial Zone, as Referred to City Council by the Planning Commission Briefing and possible action legacy design group agenda summary.pdfresolution 32 -2019 legacy design group hillside development permit.pdfchapter 17.55 code.pdflegacy design group hillside site layout with contours.pdflegacy design group hillside site layout with slope study.pdflegacy design group hillside slope study.pdf Resolution 31 -2019: A Resolution Conditionally Approving the Millcreek Corner Subdivision, a Minor Subdivision of 808 Millcreek Drive Located in the R -2, Residential Zoning District, as Referred to Council by the Planning Commission Briefing and possible action millcreek corner agenda summary.pdf resolution 31 -2019 millcreek corner subdivision.pdf millcreek corner subdivision final plat.pdf millcreek corner.pdf Ordinance 2019 -11: An Ordinance Modifying Moab Municipal Code Title 5, Chapter 5.67, Pertaining to Nightly Rentals - Discussion and possible action agenda summary sheet str.pdf proposed ordinance 2019-11.pdf chapter 5.67 legislative copy.pdf chapter 5.67 clean copy.pdf Approval of a Purchasing Exception for Rick's Glass for an Amount not to Exceed $105,000 for past MARC, Recreation, and Facilities Repairs and Potential Upgrades Necessary Through the End of this Fiscal Year purchasing exception agenda summary.pdf Ordinance 2019 -16: An Ordinance Authorizing Electronic Participation in City Council Meetings and Establishing Procedures for Electronic Participation - discussion and possible action agenda summary sheet -ordinance 2019 -16 -electronic participation in meetings.pdf ordinance 2019 -16 -electronic participation in meetings.pdf Approval of Bills Against the City of Moab Adjournment Special Accommodations: In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, individuals needing special accommodations during this meeting should notify the Recorder ’s Office at 217 East Center Street, Moab, Utah 84532; or phone (435) 259 -5121 at least three (3) working days prior to the meeting. Check our website for updates at: www.moabcity.org 1.1.1.12:00 p.m.1.2.5:00 p.m.Documents:2.3.3.1.Documents:3.2.Documents:3.3.Documents:3.4.Documents:3.5.Documents:4.5.6.7.7.1.7.2.8.8.1.Documents:8.2.Documents:9.9.1.Documents:9.2.Documents:10.10.1.Documents:10.2.Documents:11.11.1.Documents:11.2.Documents:11.3.Documents:11.4.Documents: 11.5. Documents: 11.6. Documents: 11.7. Documents: 11.8. Documents: 12. 13. Moab City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: May 14, 2019 Title: Workshop Regarding Hydrologic and Hydrogeologic Assessment of the Surface Water and Groundwater Resources Affecting the Moab City Springs and Wells, Moab, Utah: Phase 2: Preliminary HESA-Based Water Budget and Aquifer Storage Evaluation Disposition: Discussion. Staff Presenter: Chuck Williams, City Engineer. Attachment(s): –Attachment 1 - Copy of Hydrologic and Hydrogeologic Assessment of the Surface Water And Groundwater Resources Affecting the Moab City Springs and Wells, Moab, Utah: Phase 2: Preliminary HESA-Based Water Budget and Aquifer Storage Evaluation Recommended Motion: N/A Background/Summary: Under contract to the City of Moab, Hydrologic Systems Analysis LLC (HSA) of Golden, Colorado, in conjunction with Heath Hydrology, Inc. (HHI) of Boulder, Colorado, was tasked to: 1) Perform a Hydrologic and Environmental System Analysis (HESA) of the Moab City Springs and Wells (MCSW) area, supported by GIS databases and maps, to develop a comprehensive and updated understanding of hydrogeologic and hydrologic characteristics of the groundwater system, using currently available data and published analyses; 2) Collect hydrological, hydrogeological and other data necessary to construct a water budget for the MCSW area, and develop an as-accurate-as-possible water budget for the MCSW area as the region affecting the City ’s springs and wells; and 3) Update three drinking water source protection plans and the delineations of the drinking water source protection zones, one for the City's Skakel Spring, one for the City's Springs 1, 2, and 3 near the golf course (referred to as "City of Moab Springs", and one for the City's wells (Wells 4, 5, 6, 7, and 10), also near the golf course. Each of these tasks constitutes a phase of the project. The report to be discussed at the Workshop contains the results of Phase 2: Collect hydrological, hydrogeological and other data necessary to construct a water budget for the MCSW area; and develop an as-accurate-as-possible water budget for the MCSW area as the region affecting the City ’s springs and wells. This report differs from the Draft United States Geological Survey (USGS) Study: “Evaluation of Groundwater Resources in the Spanish Valley Watershed, Grand and San Juan Counties, Utah” in at least one significant area. The Kolm and van der Heijde reports exclusively evaluate only the Glen Canyon Aquifer. This is because the City’s springs and wells are almost exclusively contained within this aquifer. The USGS study evaluated the Glen Canyon Aquifer and also evaluated the Valley Fill Aquifer since it is the other significant aquifer contained within the Moab Spanish Valley Region. When comparing the total water budget results from each study this should be kept in mind. HYDROLOGIC AND HYDROGEOLOGIC ASSESSMENT OF THE SURFACE WATER AND GROUNDWATER RESOURCES AFFECTING THE MOAB CITY SPRINGS AND WELLS, MOAB, UTAH: PHASE 2: PRELIMINARY HESA-BASED WATER BUDGET AND AQUIFER STORAGE EVALUATION Authors: Dr. Kenneth E. Kolm, Hydrologic Systems Analysis, LLC., Golden, Colorado and Paul K.M. van der Heijde, Heath Hydrology, Inc., Boulder, Colorado Prepared For: City of Moab, Utah March 2019 Front Page: View of central Mill Creek and the Mill Creek Fracture Zone/French Drain in the southern area of the Glen Canyon Group Mill Creek Subsystem from Johnsons -Up-On-Top near Moab, Utah. Mill Creek is a perennial stream, downcut into the Glen Canyon Aquifer (H ydrogeologic Unit). (K.E. Kolm, September 2018). Moab City Springs and Wells Study – Phase II HSA/HHI page i Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ………………………………………………………………………... 1 2. HESA-BASED CONCEPTUAL MODEL OF GLEN CANYON GROUP MILL CREEK HYDROLOGIC SUBSYSTEM OF THE MCSW STUDY AREA ……….……………….. 2 3. PRELIMINARY WATER BUDGET OF GLEN CANYON GROUP MILL CREEK HYDROLOGIC SUBSYSTEM OF THE MCSW STUDY AREA ………..…………..…… 3.1 Water Budget Logic Diagram…………………………………………………… 3.2 Preliminary Water Budget for the GCMC Hydrologic System…………………. 3.3 Approach to Preliminary GCMC Water Budget Calculations…………………... 3.4 Calculations of Recharge to the GCMC Hydrologic System……………………. 3.5 Calculation of Groundwater Underflow…………………………………………. 3.6 Calculation of Mill Creek Surface Water Inflow and Outflow………………….. 3.7 Calculation of Consumptive Use by Riparian Vegetation………………………. 3.8 Calculation of Spring Discharge (including Skakel Spring)…………………….. 3.9 Calculation of City of Moab Municipal Use (City Springs and Wells)…………. 3.10 Calculation of Domestic Consumptive Use……………………………………. 3.11 Preliminary Pre-Development and Post Development Water Budgets for the GCMC Hydrologic System………………………………………………….. 3.12 PWB and the GCMC Hydrologic System: Discussion of Uncertainty………… 3.13 PWB and the GCMC Hydrologic System: Concerns regarding Sustainability… 3.14 PWB and the GCMC Hydrologic System: Recommendations for Monitoring and Modeling…………………………………………………………………. 10 11 11 16 18 18 19 20 21 21 21 22 22 24 25 4. PRELIMINARY GROUNDWATER STORAGE CALCULATIONS FOR THE GCMC HYDROLOGIC SYSTEM…………………………………………………………………… 4.1 Approach to Determine Groundwater Storage for the Glen Canyon Group Aquifer……………………………………………………………………….. 4.2 Approach and Calculation of Groundwater Storage for the Glen Canyon Group Aquifer……………………………………………………………………….. 4.3 Storage and the GCMC Hydrologic System: Discussion of Uncertainty………... 30 30 31 32 5. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS …………………………………………………….. 33 6. REFERENCES ……………………………………………….….……………………….. 37 Moab City Springs and Wells Study – Phase II HSA/HHI page ii List of Tables Table 1a Preliminary pre-development water budget (surface water + groundwater) estimates for GCMC project area using low estimate for consumptive use by phreatophytes………………………………………………………………….. 26 Table 1b Preliminary post-development water budget (surface water + groundwater) estimates for GCMC project area using low estimate for consumptive use by phreatophytes………………………………………………………………….. 27 Table 2a Preliminary pre-development water budget (surface water + groundwater) estimates for GCMC project area using high estimate for consumptive use by phreatophytes………………………………………………………………….. 28 Table 2b Preliminary post-development water budget (surface water + groundwater) estimates for GCMC project area using high estimate for consumptive use by phreatophytes………………………………………………………………….. 29 List of Figures Figure 1 Topographic map showing the Phase 1 Moab City Springs and Wells (MCSW) study area, and the location of the City of Moab springs and wells and related Drinking Water Source Protection (DWSP) zones…………….…. 1 Figure 2 View of the regional setting of the Moab City springs and wells and the approximate Phase 2 Water Budget (WB) area outlined in yellow…………… 2 Figure 3 Map showing the five surface hydrologic systems in the MCSW study area on top of hydrogeologic units...……………………………………………….. 4 Figure 4 Plan view of the Conceptual Site Model (CSM) subsystems of the MCSW study area on top of hydrogeologic units……………………………………… 5 Figure 5 Plan view of the hydrostructures on top of the hydrogeologic units of the MCSW study area……………………………………………………………... 6 Figure 6 Plan view of the flow directions in the groundwater system on top of the hydrogeologic units of the MCSW study area………………………………… 7 Figure 7 Plan view of the location of spring areas, and the conceptual site model subsystems, h ydrogeologic units, and streams of the MCSW Study Area……. 9 Figure 8 Generalized hydrologic system components and processes…………………... 12 Figure 9 Map showing the location of the Preliminary Water Budget (PWB) area of the GCMC hydrologic system on top of the hydrogeologic units of the MCSW study area………..……………………………………………….…… 13 Figure 10a Map showing the location of the Preliminary Water Budget (PWB) area and hydro zones of the GCMC hydrologic system with boundary conditions and spring locations………………………………………………………………... 14 Figure 10b Map showing the location of the Preliminary Water Budget (PWB) area and hydro Zones of the GCMC hydrologic system with boundary conditions and well locations………………………………………………………………….. 14 Figure 11 Simplified diagram of inflows and outflows for the GCMC hydrologic system…………………………………………………………………………. 15 Moab City Springs and Wells Study – Phase II HSA/HHI page iii Figure 12 Map showing the location of the Preliminary Water Budget (PWB) Area and the hydro zones of the GCMC hydrologic system…………………………….. 17 Figure 13 Map showing the location of Preliminary Water Budget (PWB) area and the location of the discharge stations as published by Blanchard (1990)…………. 20 Appendices Appendix A Recharge and storage calculations for hydro zones in the GCMC hydrologic system……………………………………………………….. 38 Appendix B Springs in the GCMC hydrologic system as reported by the Utah State Water Rights Division…………………………………………………… 40 Appendix C-1 Stream flow data at USGS gages 09183500 and 09183600 at and below Sheley tunnel: annually averaged flow in cusecs……………………….. 41 Appendix C-2 Stream flow data at USGS gages 09183500 and 09183600 at and below Sheley tunnel: averaged monthly flow in cusecs………………………… 42 Moab City Springs and Wells Study – Phase II HSA/HHI page 1 1 INTRODUCTION Under an agreement with City of Moab, Utah, Hydrologic Systems Analysis LLC (HSA) of Golden, Colorado, in conjunction with Heath Hydrology, Inc. (HHI) of Boulder, Colorado, was tasked to: 1) Perform a Hydrologic and Environmental System Analysis (HESA) of the Moab City Springs and Wells (MCSW) area, supported by GIS databases and maps, to develop a comprehensive and updated understanding of hydrogeologic and hydrologic characteristics of the groundwater system, using currently available data and published analyses; 2) Collect hydrological, hydrogeological and other data necessary to construct a water budget for the MCSW area, and develop an as-accurate-as-possible water budget for the MCSW area as the region affecting the City’s springs and wells; and 3) Update three drinking water source protection plans and the delineations of the drinking water source protection zones, one for the City's Skakel Spring, one for the City's Springs 1, 2, and 3 near the golf course (referred to as "City of Moab Springs", and one for the City's wells (Wells 4, 5, 6, 7, and 10), also near the golf course (see Figure 1 for the current delineation of the Moab Drinking Water Source Protection (DWSP) Zones for the wells and springs). Each of these tasks constitutes a phase of the project. This report contains the results of Phase 2: Collect hydrological, hydrogeological and other data necessary to construct a water budget for the MCSW area; and develop an as-accurate-as- possible water budget for the MCSW area as the region affecting the City’s springs and wells. The results of the HESA of the MCSW area performed in Phase 1 are documented in Kolm and van der Heijde (2018). Figure 1. Topographic map showing the Phase 1 Moab City Springs and Wells (MCSW) Study Area, and the location of the City of Moab springs and wells and related Drinking Water Source Protection (DWSP) zones. Moab City Springs and Wells Study – Phase II HSA/HHI page 2 The Phase 1 study area is located between the La Sal Mountains to the southeast, the Colorado River to the northwest, the Porcupine Rim to the northeast, and the Moab Rim to the southwest (Figure 1). Based on the results of Phase 1, the combined Mill Creek Watershed and Glen Canyon aquifer underlying the Sand Flats region is chosen as the setting for the water budget developed in Phase 2 of this project, and for the updating of the Water Protection Plans for the springs and wells of the City of Moab planned for Phase 3 (Figure 2). The HESA of the surface water and groundwater systems in the MCSW study area made extensive use of existing GIS databases and maps of geologic, hydrogeologic and hydrologic characteristics, collected specifically for this study. Additional data layers and evaluations were prepared to illustrate the HESA – particularly with respect to the hydrogeological characteristics of the rock types present and the significance of hydrostructures (i.e., hydrogeologically significant faults and fracture zones). The results of the HESA provide the conceptual basis for the development of the hydrological water budget for the City wells and springs in this second project phase. The HESA included a few scoping site visits to the study area; additional field surveys have been conducted as the project progressed. Figure 2. View of the regional setting of the Moab City springs and wells and the approximate Phase 2 Water Budget (WB) area outlined in yellow (Source: Google Earth, Imagery May 2016). Various information sources have been consulted in preparation of the Phase 2 analysis of the hydrological water budget for the City wells and springs, including Federal, State and City reports and data bases. When applicable, data were organized in a Geographical Information System (GIS) using the ESRI® ArcMapTM software. The data sources included Utah AGRC (Automated Geographic Reference Center), Utah Division of Water Rights (UDWR), Utah Division of Environmental Quality (Utah DEQ), Utah Geological Survey (UGS), U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, City of Moab City Springs and Wells Study – Phase II HSA/HHI page 3 Moab, and others. In addition, HSA/HHI has prepared a number of data layers specifically for this report through interpretation of existing data sets and field reconnaissance. It should be noted that that this report will not obviate the need for additional hydrogeologic analysis on a site-specific/parcel-specific basis by developers and/or the City, or in any water right, geotechnical, or environmental study requiring due diligence. The information in this report is intended to be used as indicator only, as part of a multi-step land use or water management decision-making process, and to provide a starting point for further study of the City's surface water and groundwater resources. Moab City Springs and Wells Study – Phase II HSA/HHI page 4 2 HESA-BASED CONCEPTUAL MODEL OF GLEN CANYON GROUP MILL CREEK HYDROLOGIC SUBSYSTEM OF THE MCSW STUDY AREA Hydrologic and Environmental System Analysis (HESA) is an approach used to conceptualize and characterize relevant features of hydrologic and environmental systems, integrating aspects of climate, topography, geomorphology, groundwater and surface water hydrology, geology, ecosystem structure and function, and the human activities associated with these systems into a holistic, three-dimensional dynamic conceptual site model (CSM). This watershed-based, hierarchical approach is described by Kolm and others (1996) and codified in ASTM D5979 Standard Guide for Conceptualization and Characterization of Ground Water Systems (ASTM 1996, 2008). The CSM of the MCSW study area covers elements of climate, topography, soils and geomorphology, surface water characteristics, hydrogeologic framework, hydrology, and anthropogenic activity as related to the surface water and groundwater systems in the study area. Based on field surveys and a preliminary HESA, a number of surface water subsystems (Figure 3) and hydrogeologic subsystems (Figure 4) were identified within the MCSW study area in Phase 1 of this project (Kolm and van der Heijde, 2018). Each of these subsystems is characterized by a unique combination of surface water system, hydrogeologic setting, and groundwater flow system (Figure 5) and is described in detail in the Phase 1 report. Section 2 of the Phase 2 report summarizes the HESA-based conceptual model of the Glen Canyon Group Mill Creek Hydrologic Subsystem of the MCSW study area as presented in the Phase 1 report. This subsystem is the focal point of the preliminary water budget analysis presented in later sections of this report. Figure 3. Map showing the three surface hydrologic systems in the MCSW study area on top of hydrogeologic units (see legend in Figure 4). Modified from Figure 19 in Kolm and van der Heijde (2018). Moab City Springs and Wells Study – Phase II HSA/HHI page 5 Figure 4. Plan view of the Conceptual Site Model (CSM) subsystems of the MCSW study area on top of hydrogeologic units: 1a. La Sal Mountain Upper Alluvial Subsystem (LSMA-M) Mill Creek Headwaters; 1b. La Sal Mountain Upper Alluvial Subsystem (LSMA-P) Pack Creek Headwaters; 2a. Wilson Mesa Alluvial Fan Subsystem (WMAF); 2b. South Mesa Alluvial Fan Subsystem (SMAF); 3. Glen Canyon Group Mill Creek Subsystem (GCMC); 4. Glen Canyon Group Grandstaff Creek Subsystem (GCGC); and 5. Pack Creek Lower Alluvium Subsystem (PCLA). Modified from Figure 21 in Kolm and van der Heijde (2018). The Glen Canyon Group Mill Creek Subsystem (GCMC), located in the core of the study area (CSM 3 in Figure 4), is a complex mix of fractured and faulted Entrada Sandstone (Je) and Glen Canyon Group (Jgc), Eolian Sand (Qes), and hydrostructures (fault and fracture zones) which form the robust groundwater system and surface water system that is directly connected to the City of Moab springs and wells in the vicinity of the golf course and Skakel Spring (Figures 4, 5 and 6). Compared with the other 4 subsystems, GCMC is the most important subsystem for the City of Moab springs and wells, and Skakel Spring sustainability and protection, although knowledge of the LSMA-M, WMAF, and SMAF subsystems is crucial in protecting these assets. This subsystem is hydraulically connected to the Pack Creek Lower Alluvium subsystem downgradient predominantly by Mill Creek, outflow streams from the major springs like Skakel Spring, and by surface water diversions from Mill Creek (Sheley Tunnel diversion to Ken’s Lake) and does not have significant direct groundwater connection through shallow or deep hydrogeologic units in the MCSW study area. Moab City Springs and Wells Study – Phase II HSA/HHI page 6 Figure 5. Plan view of the hydrostructures on top of the hydrogeologic units of the MCSW study area. Modified from Figure 18 in Kolm and van der Heijde (2018). As stated in Section 2.5.2 in Kolm and van der Heijde (2018), there are two significant hydrogeologic groups in the GCMC Subsystem, which includes Mill Creek and its tributaries: 1) Quaternary unconsolidated clastic materials (Figure 15; Table 2a in Kolm and van der Heijde, 2018), which are predominantly Stream Alluvium (Qal) and Eolian Sand (Qes); partially overlying 2) Mesozoic bedrock units (Figure 16; Table 2b in Kolm and van der Heijde, 2018), including the following potentially water-bearing units: Entrada Sandstone (Je) and the Glen Canyon Group (Jgc), including the Navajo Sandstone (Jn), the Kayenta Sandstone when fractured (Jk), and the Wingate Sandstone (Jw). In addition, there are two types of geological structures in the GCMC Subsystem of significance to the hydrogeology in general and to groundwater flow directions in particular (Figure 5): 1) Northeast-southwest and east-west trending fault/fracture zone hydrostructures; and 2) Northwest-southeast trending faults, and fault/fracture zone hydrostructures (bedrock high-K units) that are observed on both the northeastern and southwestern sides of Spanish Valley dipping vertically. The most prominent northeast-southwest and east-west trending fracture zones are observed in most of the Mill Creek tributaries such as Rill Creek, the lower part of North Fork Mill Creek, and the “Spring Fork” of Mill Creek (an unnamed, spring-fed tributary to Mill Creek east of the Moab Springs and wells). Several bends in the main Mill Creek drainage have this trend, as does the main Mill Creek gorges in two locations: 1) the reach from the La Sal Mountains to the upper Sand Flats region where the Ken’s Lake (Sheley Moab City Springs and Wells Study – Phase II HSA/HHI page 7 Tunnel) diversion is located; and the reach where the North Fork Mill Creek joins the main fork of Mill Creek and exits to the Spanish Valley. In addition, the main fracture zone from the “Middle Fork” of Mill Creek to the City of Moab springs and wells at the golf course has this same trend. These hydrofractures are “French drains” or high-K zones in the Glen Canyon bedrock in the Mill Creek system and are open with gaining tributary reaches (groundwater discharging to streams) (Figures 5 and 6). In the case of the fracture zone at the junction of the “Spring Fork” of Mill Creek with the Main Fork, this east-west fracture zone transports Mill Creek surface water as groundwater through the Moab City springs fracture zone to the City of Moab bedrock springs along the edge of Spanish Valley (Figures 5and 6) and is quite important to the springs and wells protection. Figure 6. Plan view of the flow directions in the groundwater system on top of the hydrogeologic units of the MCSW study area. The small arrows are local groundwater flow directions. The larger blue arrows show groundwater flow direction along major hydrostructures and the major groundwater flow direction in the Spanish Valley area. Modified from Figure 22 in Kolm and van der Heijde (2018). The entire Mill Creek gorge from the Ken’s Lake intake to the junction with the North Fork Mill Creek, and the upper part of the North Fork Mill Creek are along a northwest- southeast trending fault and fracture zone that is critical to understanding the GCMC hydrologic system (Figures 5 and 6). These zones serve as French Drains to the GCMC groundwater system, and for much of their reaches are gaining streams. The other major northwest-southeast fault zone of importance to the GCMC subsystem bounds the eastern Spanish Valley rimlands Moab City Springs and Wells Study – Phase II HSA/HHI page 8 for their entire length and has the name Kayenta Heights Fault Zone along the City of Moab and Extended Kayenta Heights Fault Zone between Mill Creek and the City of Moab Springs Fracture Zone (Figures 5 and 6). The Kayenta Heights fault zone is open and a groundwater conduit moving water from Mill Creek to various springs and discharge zones, including City of Moab’s Skakel Spring. The middle and southern part of this fault zone may serve as a conduit, but also as a block bringing the Glen Canyon Group next to the Permian shales and salts, as evidenced by the City of Moab springs near the Moab golf course. The shallow Quaternary unconsolidated materials in this subsystem are located in two strategic locations: 1) directly along the main channels of the stream (Qal); and 2) scattered on the mesa tops (Qes) (Figure 15 and Table 2a in Kolm and van der Heijde, 2018). These highly- permeable deposits are homogeneous, mostly fine to medium grained sand, and locally derived from the weathering of Glen Canyon Group (Jgc) bedrock. The Glen Canyon Group bedrock has both matrix flow and fracture flow. The matrix flow has ranges estimated from 0.1 – 0.3 m/day (Jobin, 1962; Blanchard, 1990; Lowe and others, 2007); and the fracture flow can be as high as 25 m/day (88 ft/day) (Freethey and Cordy, 1991). Therefore, fracture flow will dominate travel times and will be most important for contaminant studies and well/spring protections, as well as estimating groundwater storage and recharge rates. The general aspects of groundwater flow in the Quaternary unconsolidated materials have been discussed in Section 2.5 of Kolm and van der Heijde (2018). Specifically, the Eolian Sand (Qes) facilitates enhanced groundwater recharge by infiltration of precipitation (snow and rain) to the bedrock underneath. The Quaternary Stream Alluvium (Qal) in the Mill Creek channel and tributaries is closely aligned with the stream levels except where the stream is gaining, in which case the groundwater levels may be higher reflecting water moving from the bedrock into the stream. Recharge to the Entrada Sandstone and Glen Canyon Group in the GCMC subsystem is by infiltration of precipitation (snow and rain) directly into bedrock, or through the eolian sand cover on the surface of the mesa and interfluve tops; by northeast-southwest and east-west trending fracture-controlled ephemeral stream channels, by northwest-southeast trending fracture controlled ephemeral stream channels, and by losing reaches of flowing streams (Figure 6). These ephemeral channels are located mostly to the east along the Porcupine Rim, and along the Entrada Sandstone bluffs that are below Wilson Mesa and South Mesa (Figure 4). There may be a small amount of groundwater entering from under Wilson Mesa and South Mesa, but there is no evidence to date of this occurring and the amounts that may be entering the system by this mechanism are at this stage of preliminary water budget analysis considered negligible. Groundwater flow in the Entrada Sandstone and Glen Canyon Group is strongly fracture controlled and moves from the drainage divides in the same direction as the stream with various stream reaches being gaining or losing depending on topography, bedrock hydrogeology, hydrostructures, and saturated thickness of the bedrock. Most of the streams are French drains where groundwater discharges into the gaining streams. There is also groundwater discharge from the bedrock locally mostly by phreatophytes. Moab City Springs and Wells Study – Phase II HSA/HHI page 9 The subregional groundwater flow direction is from southeast to northwest and east to west parallel to the Spanish Valley salt anticline collapse structures and both the North Fork Mill Creek and main fork Mill Creek canyons (Figure 6). The high-K zone flow systems of Mill Creek and the North Fork Mill Creek collect most of the groundwater flow system which ultimately ends in the Mill Creek main channel system (Figure 6). The connectivity and interactions of Mill Creek with the groundwater flow paths of the GCMC subsystem along the eastern margins of the Spanish Valley area, from the Ken’s Lake diversion to the emergence of Mill Creek into the Spanish Valley in the City of Moab, are extremely complex, and are discussed and illustrated in detail in Kolm and van der Heijde (2018). Groundwater discharges out of the GCMC subsystem in two places due to complex hydrostructures: 1) The (Extended) Kayenta Heights (K-H) Fault Zone that delivers groundwater to various springs and seeps along its path including Skakel Spring at the northwest end of Spanish Valley and springs located between the Milk Creek delta and the City of Moab springs; and 2) The City of Moab Springs Fracture Zone that delivers groundwater to the City of Moab springs (Figure 7). At these locations, groundwater moves vertically upward onto the surface as discharge at springs, and the surface runoff from the springs flows over bedrock in channels down into the Pack Creek subsystem (Figures 6 and 7). Figure 7. Plan view of the location of spring areas, and the conceptual site model subsystems, hydrogeologic units, and streams of the MCSW Study Area. Modified from Figure 24 in Kolm and van der Heijde (2018). Moab City Springs and Wells Study – Phase II HSA/HHI page 10 3 PRELIMINARY WATER BUDGET OF GLEN CANYON GROUP MILL CREEK HYDROLOGIC SUBSYSTEM OF THE MCSW STUDY AREA In section 2 of this report, the components of the Glen Canyon Group Mill Creek (GCMC) hydrogeologic system and the surface water and groundwater flow systems have been discussed. The GCMC has been analyzed with respect to surface water dynamics (stream input or stream flux in, stream flow through the given area, stream output or stream flux out) and available stream flow data have been collected (for example, Blanchard, 1990; USGS Surface- Water Dailey Statistics, Mill Creek at Sheley Tunnel Sites, 2019). In addition, precipitation data relevant for the watershed have been collected in table and map format (Kolm and van der Heijde, 2018). Likewise, the major elements of the dynamics of the hydrogeologic system -- groundwater input or recharge areas, groundwater output or discharge areas, and the (internal) groundwater flow system -- have been determined (See Section 2.0 and Kolm and van der Heijde, 2018). Well and spring data to quantify groundwater output have been collected from various sources (Lowe and others, 2007; Kolm and van der Heijde, 2018; Utah Water Rights Data Base, 2017, 2018). Published groundwater level data have enabled the determination of groundwater flow direction and amount of water storage and well yield at a given point in the groundwater system (Lowe and others, 2007), which can be used to calculate groundwater flux and storage over time. In order to further understand how the GCMC hydrologic system works, and to determine quantitatively if the hydrologic system is properly analyzed, a water budget may be developed for a given part of, or the entirety of the GCMC hydrologic system. The hydrologic system water budget, or water balance, is the quantitative listing of the surface water and groundwater inputs and outputs, and changes in internal storage over a particular period of time. In its most simple form, the period of time is chosen such that the internal storage changes are so small that they do not have to be taken into account. Considering climatic variability, often a multi-year period with averaged inputs and outputs is selected to determine the water budget for a particular hydrologic system. Without a storage term, the water budget inputs should be equal to or "balance" the water budget outputs. The selection of the time period for which to calculate the water budget depends, among others, on the nature of the climatic variability, and the availability of climatic and hydrologic records. Frequently this is done for a one- or multi-year period to capture a full cycle of seasons, or multi-year trends. For shorter periods of time, such as the growing season, water budget calculations may involve estimating the release from or addition to internal storage. This change in storage could be seasonal changes in measured water tables, or changes in reservoir water levels. The first step in determining a water budget for the GCMC hydrologic system is to determine the correct hydrologic system conceptual model using HESA. With HESA, individual components of the hydrologic system are analyzed, followed by evaluating the aggregate of components and their interactions, to locate and quantify relevant hydrologic subsystems. The results of the HESA for the GCMC analysis area are given in Section 2. Step 2 in determining the water budget is setting up a logic diagram based on the conceptual models to show all the significant hydrologic components and processes, including the external hydrologic system inputs, outputs, and internal components or storage areas, and exchanges between internal components. Step 3 is to subset the overall conceptual model area to a manageable area where Moab City Springs and Wells Study – Phase II HSA/HHI page 11 quantification of the hydrologic system will be most practical and accurate given the available data and the landscape terrain measurability (i.e., estimates of inputs and outputs where engineering data is not available or not practical/cost-effective at this time). U 3.1 Water Budget Logic Diagram The diagram shown in Figure 8 shows the relevant generalized hydrologic system components and processes identified during the HESA of the MCSW study of Phase 1. In this diagram, hydrologic and hydrogeologic units or storage components are represented by boxes and the hydrologic exchange processes or fluxes by arrows. Note that the processes internal to the hydrologic units, such as atmospheric flow, stream flow, and groundwater flow, are not included. The main hydrologic units are: 1) atmosphere; 2) unsaturated zone (between ground surface and water table); 3) shallow groundwater zone (saturated valley-fill unconsolidated sediments); and 4) deep groundwater zone (bedrock hydrogeologic units and hydrostructures). Figure 8 also shows the process-type interactions between these hydrologic units. These processes can be quantified as fluxes or flow rates such as precipitation rates (L/T), groundwater recharge (L/T), spring discharge (L^3/T), groundwater discharge to/recharge from streams (L^3/T/L'), and well discharge (L^3/T). It should be noted that many of the processes are difficult to measure or estimate and introduce significant uncertainty in water budget calculations when used. Often, to get a better understanding of the water budget components and reduce uncertainty, the complex set of hydrologic units and processes shown in Figure 8 is simplified by reducing the number of units and processes based on HESA evaluated significance of and data availability for each of these components. For example, a water budget may focus on surface water and its interaction with the atmosphere. In that case, the subsurface units and processes, depicted in Figure 8 as the unsaturated zone, the shallow groundwater (saturated zone), and deep groundwater zone (bedrock) and related processes, would be represented by a single gain or loss flux. In the same fashion, a focus on the groundwater system may replace the atmosphere, streams, and unsaturated zone by inputs and outputs only, and any change in storage would be limited the shallow and deep aquifers. The Conceptual Site Model resulting from the HESA of the GCMC hydrologic system, together with the location of the Mill Creek and North Fork Mill Creek stream flow gages, provided guidance on how to delineate the water budget area and how to simplify the complex hydrologic system components and process illustrated in Figure 8 in preparation of a preliminary water budget for GCMC hydrologic system. 3.2 Preliminary Water Budget for the GCMC Hydrologic System A preliminary water budget (PWB) for the GCMC hydrologic system is calculated based upon the information previously collected and analyzed by Kolm and van der Heijde (2018), and the HESA-based conceptual model of the GCMC hydrologic system determined in Phase 1 of Moab City Springs and Wells Study – Phase II HSA/HHI page 12 Figure 8. Generalized hydrologic system components and processes. this project. The area in GCMC for which the water budget is determined is based, in part, on 1) the locations of various stream gages on Mill Creek and North Fork of Mill Creek (Blanchard, 1990); 2) the location of most anthropogenic activities (diversions, domestic and agricultural water use); 3) the natural boundaries of the GCMC hydrologic system including Mill Creek and tributaries; and 4) the hydrogeologic and hydrostructural boundaries of the Glen Canyon Aquifer as determined by HESA (Figures 9 and 10). The water budget area is outlined in both Figures 9 and 10 and is bounded by the Glen Canyon Group Grandstaff Creek Subsystem (GCGC) to the north; the Morrison Formation to the east and southeast; and the Pack Creek Lower Alluvium Subsystem (PCLA) to the west and southwest (Figures 4, 9 and 10). The surface and subsurface hydrologic systems or storage components and the hydrologic exchange processes or fluxes considered relevant for the PWB of the GCMC hydrologic system were derived from the conceptual models developed in the Phase 1 HESA as illustrated in Figure 9 (hydrogeological units) and Figure 10 (boundary conditions) and are shown in the diagram in Figure 11. The significant inputs of the PWB are: 1) Mill Creek surface water at the SE corner of the water balance area; 2) Mill Creek groundwater flux, called groundwater underflow, in the fractured Glen Canyon hydrogeologic units (Jgc) at the SE corner of the water budget area; and 3) recharge by infiltration of precipitation (rain and snow) across the entire GCMC area using the concept of hydro zones explained later in this report. Moab City Springs and Wells Study – Phase II HSA/HHI page 13 Figure 9. Map showing the location of the Preliminary Water Budget (PWB) area of the GCMC hydrologic system on top of the hydrogeologic units of the MCSW study area prepared by Kolm and van der Heijde (2018). The outputs of the PWB are: 1) Mill Creek surface water outflow at the northern end of Spanish Valley along the Mill Creek Delta just downstream from the Powerhouse; 2) evapotranspiration or consumptive use by native phreatophytes (cottonwoods, willows, tamarisk, and other riparian species); 3) groundwater discharge from the fractured GCMC hydrogeologic units to major springs, including the Moab City springs and Skakel Spring, and 4) domestic consumptive use by private wells (Figures 10a and 10b). Figure 11 shows a diagrammatic representation of these water budget components. It should be noted that the groundwater inflow components "irrigation return flow" and "septic tank leach field infiltration" shown in Figure 11 are considered small enough not to be taken into consideration for the PWB; all terms on the left side except "stream flow" are considered consumptive use. A starting point for determining the PWB is the climate data collected for the weather station MOAB, UT (USCOO425733) in the town of Moab at 4054ft (formerly known as National Weather Service (NWS) Cooperative Network (COOP) station 425733) and LASAL MOUNTAIN, UT (USS0009L03S) at 9560ft (see Figure 3 and Tables 1a, 1b and 1c in Kolm and van der Heijde; 2018). These two stations, for which the data are available at NOAA's National Moab City Springs and Wells Study – Phase II HSA/HHI page 14 Figure 10a. Map showing the location of the Preliminary Water Budget (PWB) area and hydro zones of the GCMC hydrologic system with boundary conditions and spring locations. Figure 10b. Map showing the location of the Preliminary Water Budget (PWB) area and hydro Zones of the GCMC hydrologic system with boundary conditions and well locations. Moab City Springs and Wells Study – Phase II HSA/HHI page 15 Fig 11. Simplified diagram of inflows and outflows for the GCMC hydrologic system. Centers for Environmental Information, provide an overlapping period of observations (1982- 2017) useful for comparative analysis, and the Moab station has a continuous record from 1971 to the present for analysis regarding predevelopment and current water budgets. The climate data for the Moab and La Sal Mountain stations, together with other neighboring stations, have been used to develop maps showing the spatial distribution of average annual precipitation for the period 1971-2000 and 1981-2010 (available from the Natural Resources Conservation Service; see Figure 4 in Kolm and van der Heijde; 2018). As these data sources show, there is a gradual precipitation gradient in Moab/Spanish Valley from about 9 inches annually at Moab, UT in the far northwestern boundary of the GCMC study area to greater than 20 inches near the eastern edges of the GCMC hydrologic system. In addition, several other sources of published data provided input into the PWB: 1) Mill Creek and North Fork Mill Creek discharge measurements on October 21, 1985 and October 14, 1986 as published in Blanchard (1990) provided both surface water and groundwater inputs and outputs to the GCMC hydrologic system along these streams (see Figure 8a-c in Kolm and van der Heijde; 2018); 2) USGS stream gage data collected above and below the Sheley diversion provided a long-term data set regarding stream flows in the upper reach of Mill Creek and the effects of the Sheley diversion (Appendix 3); 3) Adjudicated maximum spring and well use information culled from the State of Utah Division of Water Rights data base, together with spring and well data from the City of Moab, provided a first approximation of groundwater Moab City Springs and Wells Study – Phase II HSA/HHI page 16 discharge (outputs) in the GCMC hydrologic system; and 4) Phreatophyte consumptive use measurements published by Muckel and Blaney (1945) provided data regarding outputs due to natural vegetation effects in the GCMC hydrologic system. 3.3 Approach to Preliminary GCMC Water Budget Calculations The identified data sets mostly provide a “snap shot” of a particular variable in time and were gathered at various, non-compatible moments in time. The challenge in this project is to extrapolate from measured values where necessary. The starting point is the determination of the pre-development (pre-1980s) annual averaged water budget components, resulting in recharge from precipitation checked against an independent evaluation of various realistic recharge scenarios. The estimated pre-development recharge, together with adjustments to some of the other water budget components will then be used for the post-development (1980s- to present) water budget. In order to quantify some of the components of the preliminary GCMC water budget given the sparseness of published data, the GCMC hydrologic system was spatially categorized into 5 types of hydro zones based upon the hydrogeology and geomorphology, groundwater and surface water hydrology, and distribution of phreatophytes (Figures 10a, 10b and 12; Appendix A). Hydro Zone 1 is the phreatophyte zone and represents the discharge hydro function including gaining stream reaches and phreatic consumptive use. Hydro Zone 2 is the riparian high-K fracture zone (French Drain) and represents the recharge and storage hydro functions including fractured canyon recharge and storage, with phreatophyte discharge occurring in the same area. Hydro Zone 3 is the matrix (non-fractured) zone and represents very slow recharge and small storage hydro functions. Hydro Zone 4 is the Dry Wash high-K fracture zone (French Drain) and represents the recharge and storage hydro functions including fractured canyon, dry wash recharge and storage, but having insignificant phreatophyte discharge occurring in the same area. Hydro Zone 5 is the fracture enhanced high-K matrix zone and represents the recharge and storage hydro functions including fracture enhanced recharge and storage. To correctly attribute the parameters for these zones, each hydro zone has been divided in hydro sub-zones indicated by the numbers in Figure 12, which correspond with the OBJECTID numbers in Appendix A. The City of Moab provided assistance in digitizing the hydro zones and sub-zones. Preliminary pre-development GCMC water budget calculations were completed initially to calibrate for the best estimate of natural recharge from infiltration of precipitation in each hydro zone (Figure 12) and for input from the Mill Creek surface water system into the groundwater system (Tables 1a and 2a). The estimated groundwater recharge from precipitation provides a base for the analysis of the effects of climate change on the groundwater system. The estimated input from the Mill Creek surface water system into the groundwater system allows for the analysis of the effects of the natural and anthropogenic changes in the La Sal Mountains via integrated surface water and groundwater systems up-gradient from the study area. The preliminary pre-development GCMC water budget (pre-1980s) has as inputs: 1) Recharge from precipitation for each hydro zone using the climate data for the period 1971-2000; 2) groundwater underflow along the Mill Creek fracture zone; and 3) Mill Creek inflow at the point of entry to the GCMC hydrologic system above the Sheley diversion (Figures 10a, 10b and 12). Moab City Springs and Wells Study – Phase II HSA/HHI page 17 Preliminary pre-development GCMC water budget (pre-1980s) has as outputs: 1) Consumptive use riparian vegetation; 2) Springs on the Kayenta Fault Zone and its southern extension (including Skakel Spring); 3) Municipal water use (City of Moab Springs and Wells); 4) Domestic consumptive use, irrigation and stock water; and 5) Mill Creek outflow at its delta (Figures 10a, 10b and 12; Tables 1a and 2a). Preliminary post-development GCMC water budget calculations (from the early 1980s to present) are completed with the calibrated recharge and consumptive use inputs determined in the pre-development water budgets, adjusted with the climate data for the period 1980-2010, to evaluate the average annual change in water storage due to changes in climate and anthropogenic activities (Tables 1b and 2b). Specifically, the effects of the Sheley diversion, the changes in municipal use, and domestic consumptive use on input and output are evaluated, and the change of storage is calculated. Storage calculations are also evaluated separately for individual hydro zones of the GCMC hydrologic system based on hydrogeology and hydrofractures, and the percentage of storage change is evaluated in the context of the overall storage capacity in Section 4. Figure 12. Map showing the location of the Preliminary Water Budget (PWB) Area and the hydro zones of the GCMC hydrologic system. The numbers in the figure refer to the hydro sub-zones specifically defined and digitized for the development of the PWB. Moab City Springs and Wells Study – Phase II HSA/HHI page 18 3.4 Calculation of Recharge to the GCMC Hydrologic System To evaluate recharge, three potential recharge scenarios have been evaluated as a function of the spatial distribution and amount of precipitation in each hydro zone (10% of precipitation for unfractured matrix hydro zones combined with 10%, 20% or 30% of precipitation for the fracture-enhanced matrix and fractured canyons/ dry wash hydro zones). The average annual precipitation was calculated for each hydro sub-zone in both inches and acre- ft for both the periods 1971-2000 and 1981-2010 by overlaying the sub-zone GIS layer with the two precipitation GIS layers. Note that the average annual precipitation declined by about 2% from the period 1971-2000 to the period 1981-2010. The results are listed in Appendix A. Six calculations of recharge scenarios, three for pre-development conditions (1971-2000) and three for post-development conditions (1981-2010), were completed: 1) Recharge of 10% of precipitation for period 1971-2000 of 3050 ac-ft/yr; 2) Recharge of 20% of precipitation for period 1971-2000 of 5549 ac-ft/yr; 3) Recharge of 30% of precipitation for period 1971-2000 of 7848 ac-ft/yr; 4) Recharge of 10% of precipitation for period 1981-2010 of 2921 ac-ft/yr; 5) Recharge of 20% of precipitation for period 1981-2010 of 5225 ac-ft/yr; and 6) Recharge of 30% of precipitation for period 1981-2010 of 7530 ac-ft/yr. Note that in the 20% and 30% calculations hydro zones of type 3 (matrix only) have been kept at 10% recharge (Appendix A). As stated before, average annual precipitation ranges from about 9 inches in Moab in the far northwestern corner of the GCMC hydrologic system to greater than 20 inches near the eastern edges of the GCMC hydrologic system. It should be noted that groundwater recharge of 1-3 inches per year are common estimates in groundwater modeling and water budget studies for these types of environments. The actual recharge as used in tables 1a, 1b, 2a, and 2b is calculated as the Water Budget Balancing term for each of the two pre-development scenarios, upon which those recharge components are used in the post-development scenarios. The value in tables 1a and 1b (low consumptive use riparian vegetation) is calculated to be 9155 ac-ft/yr, or about 30% of the 1971-2000 average annual precipitation, and 31% of the 1981-2010 average annual precipitation in the water budget area; the value in tables 2a and 2b (high consumptive use riparian vegetation) is calculated to be 11,339 ac-ft/yr, or about 37% of the 1971-2000 average annual precipitation, and 39% of the 1981-2010 precipitation in the water budget area. 3.5 Calculation of Groundwater Underflow The basis for the calculation of groundwater underflow of the Mill Creek fracture zones in the southeastern boundary of the PWB area (Figures 10a and 10b; at about the location of MC-03 in Figure 13) is Darcy’s Law: Q = KIA; where Q is discharge per unit time; K is hydraulic conductivity of the fractured Hydrogeologic Unit; I is dH/dL or hydraulic gradient (change in head H over a distance L); and A is cross- sectional area. Q will be the groundwater input/inflow into the water budget that is derived from the upper La Sal Mountain subsystems. K is determined by aquifer tests, which reveal a range of Moab City Springs and Wells Study – Phase II HSA/HHI page 19 values that average approximately 50 ft/day (Sunrise Engineering, 2002). Hydraulic gradient is determined using the topographic gradient between MC01 and MC04 in Figure 13 (Blanchard 1990) of 0.086. The cross-sectional area to calculate groundwater underflow flux is estimated as the geometry of the fractured Glen Canyon aquifer French drain: 500 ft depth (from well measurements) and 100 ft width (from topographic data). This results in a groundwater underflow flux (inflow) of 4 ac-ft/yr. 3.6 Calculation of Mill Creek Surface Water Inflow and Outflow There are two datasets available for the calculation of the Milk Creek inflow and outflow components: 1) a dataset published by Blanchard (1990) concerning flow rates measured at various locations along Mill Creek and North Fork on October 21, 1985 and October 14, 1986; and 2) daily gage readings by the USGS at USGS 09183500 just above the current Sheley diversion (1954-2017) (MC07 in Figure 13) and at USGS 09183600 below the Sheley diversion (2003-2018) (MC08 in Figure 13). The average annual flow at gage 09183500 for the period of record is 7546 ac-ft/yr; the average annual flow at gage 09183600 for the period of record is 3084 ac-ft/yr. The effect of the Sheley diversion on flows in Mill Creek is analyzed for the period 2004-2017 using the 2 USGS gages. The average annual discharge at gage 09183500 for this later period is 6814 ac-ft/yr, while the average annual discharge at gage 09183600 for the same period is 3149 ac-ft/yr, a decline of 3665 ac-ft/yr or 54% of the discharge at gage 09183500. This is the average annual amount of water taken out of the GCMC hydrologic system at the Sheley diversion. Note that the average annual flow at gage 09183500 for the period 2004-2017 is 732 ac-ft/yr less than for the entire period of record 1954-2017, a decline of about 10%, while the decline in average annual precipitation is only about 2%. This is an indication that some natural or anthropogenic changes have taken place in the upper Mill Creek watershed reducing the availability of water downstream. The stream flow data given by Blanchard (1990) are used to obtain insight in the relative flows along Mill Creek between the Sheley diversion and the outflow into Spanish Valley at the Mill Creek delta. The Blanchard (1990) data reflect the post-development conditions. According to Blanchard (1990), the discharge at measuring site MC 08 below the Sheley Diversion on October 21, 1985 was 3.99 cfs, while at the same date the flow at MC19 (above the confluence with North Fork, Figure 13) was 3.21 cfs, a loss of about 20%. According to the October 14, 1986 data, North Fork contributed 3.73 cfs and Mill Creek MC19 at 3.09cfs to downstream flows, a 55% and 45% share respectively. Applying the 20% flow reduction along Mill Creek above the confluence with North Fork on the average annual pre-development discharge at MC07 of 7546 ac-ft/yr gives a flow of 6037 ac-ft/yr just above the confluence with North Fork. This, together with the contribution from North Fork of about 2890 ac-ft/yr) results in a pre- development average annual outflow at Mill Creek delta of 8927 ac-ft/yr. In a similar fashion post-development outflow at Mill Creek delta is calculated as 0.8 * 3084 (flow at MC08) + 2850 (NF contribution reduced by climate change between pre- and post-development) = 5317 ac- ft/yr. These values were used for pre-development and post-development water budget calculations (Tables 1a, 1b, 2a, and 2b). Moab City Springs and Wells Study – Phase II HSA/HHI page 20 Figure 13. Map showing the location of Preliminary Water Budget (PWB) area and the location of the discharge stations as published by Blanchard (1990). 3.7 Calculation of Consumptive Use by Riparian Vegetation Muckel and Blaney (1945), Mayboom (1964), and Gatewood and others (1950) determined that riparian vegetation (notably Cottonwoods, Willows, and Tamarisk) had consumptive use ranging from 40 – 93 in/year depending upon percentages of each species present, the healthiness or stress level of the vegetation, and the location in the ecosystem (seeps, springs, stream bottoms and floodplains). A recent study by Crowley (2004) on the Matheson Wetland Preserve located by the City of Moab inventoried the published data regarding consumptive use of riparian vegetation in the Moab, Utah area, and calculated consumptive use of vegetation at that location. For the purposes of calculating the preliminary water budgets of the GCMC hydrologic system, Muckel and Blaney’s (1945) mixed riparian category of 60 – 92.7 in/year was used to calculate the Phreatic Consumptive Use Low estimates (60 in/yr) and the Phreatic Consumptive Use High estimates (92.7 in/yr) for the Hydro Zone Type 1 Phreatophyte areas as digitized from recent aerial photography. Note that pre-development phreatic consumptive use likely was higher than the calculated post-development phreatic consumptive use as more water was available downstream from the current Sheley diversion. (Figures 10a, 10b and 12, and Appendix A). Moab City Springs and Wells Study – Phase II HSA/HHI page 21 3.8 Calculation of Spring Discharge (including Skakel Spring) The values for GCMC hydrologic springs, including Skakel Spring, were collected from the Utah State Division of Water Rights database as being the maximum sustained amounts produced by each spring (Utah State Water Rights Data Base, 2017, 2018; Appendix B). The pre-development runoff from these springs was GCMC groundwater output that flowed directly into the Pack Creek hydrologic system (PCLA) as input to the PCLA water budget. There may be springs and seeps that are not accounted for as they are not registered in the water rights data base. It should be noted that post-development spring discharge has likely declined due to the Sheley diversion in Mill Creek, but less than the decline in Mill Creek flows as there is a significant local contribution to spring flow from infiltrated precipitation. As a first approximation it is assumed that the post-development springs and seeps discharge was reduced by 20%. 3.9 Calculation of City of Moab Municipal Use (City Springs and Wells) The values for City of Moab Municipal Use, including the Moab City Springs and Wells and Skakel Spring for the period 1978-2013 were obtained from the City of Moab Engineering Department. These data indicate an average pre-development municipal use of about 1364 ac- ft/yr and an average post-development municipal use of 1875 ac-ft/yr. During pre-development time, excess runoff from the City springs was GCMC groundwater output that flowed directly into the Pack Creek hydrologic system (PCLA). Note that only well 6 (constructed in 1969) and well 10 (constructed in 1976) are producing according to the obtained production data. 3.10 Calculation of Domestic Consumptive Use Domestic consumptive use in the GCMC hydrologic system has three factors: 1) household wells; 2) domestic/irrigation/stock water wells; and 3) large irrigation wells. These wells are listed in the Utah State Water Rights Division database (Appendix B). Each consumptive use is estimated separately and combined as one consumptive use amount. The Ford (2006) report, referring to the data collected in the mid-1990s by Ford and Grandy in the Castle Valley area, determined a domestic use of 0.42 ac-ft/yr per household and the presence of 150 full-time households resulting in 63 ac-ft/yr (1996). In the GCMC hydrologic system, there are about 100 household wells resulting in approximately 40 ac-ft/yr post development. It was estimated that 2/3 of these wells were in production pre-development. From the UDWR database, there are 20 domestic use/irrigation/stock water wells post- development for up to 50 ac-ft/yr post-development consumptive use (2/3 pre-development). There are also 10 larger irrigation wells post-development for 30 ac-ft/yr (2/3 pre-development). In total, the domestic consumptive use based on the UDWR data is 80 ac-ft/yr pre-development, and 120 ac-ft/yr post-development (Tables 1a, 1b, 2a, and 2b). Note that these consumptive use numbers are a first estimate of actual consumptive use. Moab City Springs and Wells Study – Phase II HSA/HHI page 22 3.11 Preliminary Pre-Development and Post Development Water Budgets for the GCMC Hydrologic System Two preliminary pre-development water budgets and two post-development water budgets were calculated for the GCMC hydrologic system, based on: 1) Low estimate of consumptive use by phreatophytes (4009 ac-ft/yr; Appendix A; Tables 1a and 1b); and 2) High estimate of consumptive use by phreatophytes (6193 ac-ft/yr; Appendix A; Tables 2a and 2b). The preliminary pre-development water budget inputs and outputs are discussed in Sections 3.4 – 3.10. The calculation of pre-development recharge from infiltration of precipitation as an input to the GCMC hydrologic system is the difference between the calculated outputs minus the calculated inputs and is called the Water Budget Balancing term (Tables 1a and 2a). In the low estimate of consumptive use by phreatophytes scenario, the difference is 16705 ac-ft/yr minus 7550 ac-ft/yr or 9155 ac-ft/yr amounting to infiltration of approximately 30% of precipitation (Table 1a). In the high estimate of consumptive use by phreatophytes scenario, the pre-development difference is 18889 ac-ft/yr minus 7550 ac-ft/yr or 11339 ac-ft/yr amounting to infiltration of approximately 37% of precipitation (Table 2a). These two recharge estimates are used in the post-development water budgets (Tables 1b and 2b). Given upper and lower bounds on recharge, it is hypothesized that the low estimate of consumptive use by phreatophytes of 4009 ac-ft/yr is closest to simulating natural conditions, resulting in the contribution from recharge by infiltration of precipitation of about 9155 ac-ft/yr. The post-development scenarios presented in Tables 1b and 2b incorporate the Sheley Diversion outtake of 3665 ac-ft/yr, which is approximately 22% of the yearly budget for low estimate of consumptive use by phreatophytes and about 19% of the yearly budget for high estimate of consumptive use by phreatophytes. This leaves a remainder or deficit of 873 ac-ft/yr (or less than 0.4 inch decline across entire water budget area) that is removed from groundwater storage on an average year. This release from storage, referred to as the Water Budget Balancing Term in Tables 1b and 2b, can be balanced over time by increased recharge to above average precipitation years, or as increased flow to Mill Creek into the GCMC hydrologic systems due to increased groundwater release in upgradient groundwater systems, or increased runoff from higher than average snowpack. 3.12 PWB and the GCMC Hydrologic System: Discussion of Uncertainty There are many uncertainties in these preliminary calculations, so further analysis is needed and planned. The primary significance of the PWB is that there is a significant amount of surface water and groundwater contributed to the Mill Creek groundwater and surface water from the La Sal Mountain hydrological systems, or in percentages of pre-development input into the GCMC hydrologic system: surface water (Mill Creek) counts for approximately 45%; local recharge from precipitation or ephemeral channel loss counts for 55%; and groundwater counts for less than 1%. This means that the La Sal Mountain subsystems contributes slightly larger than 45% of the total inflow in the PWB area. By comparison, in the post development time period, the contribution of groundwater storage to the overall input becomes slightly more of a factor, or in percentages of post development input into the GCMC hydrologic system: surface Moab City Springs and Wells Study – Phase II HSA/HHI page 23 water (Mill Creek) counts for approximately 41%; local recharge from precipitation or ephemeral channel loss counts for 54%; and groundwater released from storage accounts for approximately 5%. Note that the Sheley diversion takes out 22% of the total inflow to the GCMC hydrologic system and has resulted in a 40% reduction of Mill Creek outflows towards Spanish Valley and 20% reduction of springs and seeps discharge. The reduction of water contributions originating from the La Sal Mountain subsystem in amounts and timing of precipitation (rain and snowfall) and snowmelt resulting from climate change may have a significant impact on stream flows, groundwater recharge and subsurface inflow into the valley. In addition, water diversion projects to other watersheds, especially up- valley, will result in decreased surface water flows and groundwater recharge from losing streams. Impacts on the GCMC water budget may also result from deforestation due to lumbering or fire (increased surface runoff and stream flows); increased forestation (increased ET; decrease of runoff and stream flows); and mining (increased or decreased stream flows and groundwater fluxes). Land use conversions/changes resulting in more or less consumptive uses need to be evaluated regarding the surface water output to Mill Creek at the southeast end of the GCMC hydrologic system. Increased consumptive use would result from increased urbanization (more wells, non-native vegetation), or increased irrigation. Many of the components of the PWB calculations include large uncertainties. The most reliable data are the USGS stream flow data in Mill Creek at and below the Sheley diversion, the springs and wells production data from the City of Moab, and the precipitation data from NOAA used to develop various recharge scenarios. All other data sets provide a “snap shot” of a particular variable in time as they were gathered at various, non-comparable moments in time and, thus, should be considered a first estimate, subject to refining by further field studies. Consumptive use by Phreatophytes is variable seasonally and annually by changes in species composition, species health, spatial distribution of vegetation, and length of growing season among other factors. An estimate of annual evapotranspiration for a water budget misses the seasonal effects of water usage and water availability, as well as multi-year natural or anthropogenic variations in water availability. However, for the cost and effort, it is difficult to improve on the studies that have been published. A possible follow-up study may focus on the changes over time in riparian vegetation coverage using historical aerial photography between the pre-1980s and later. Spring discharge measurements are based on State of Utah Water Rights data which allude to the available groundwater that is measured at the source when the water right was secured, often without consideration of seasonal and multi-year variability. The actual daily and seasonal flow of the springs is for the most part unmeasured and may fluctuate significantly. Improvements of the springs related PWB terms may be obtained by more regular measuring of the discharge of some of the larger springs. Non-City of Moab well discharge data are taken from the State of Utah Water Rights data base and considered maximum allowed discharge. Well water usage depends on the type of usage (residence, secondary home, garden watering, irrigation, livestock water) and may fluctuate on a daily, seasonal, and annual basis. The domestic consumptive use is highly variable, Moab City Springs and Wells Study – Phase II HSA/HHI page 24 and the data are not available to improve upon this is great detail. It is assumed that post- development domestic use is somewhat higher than pre-development use following the establishment of new housing developments in the PWB area, some of which are drawing entirely on groundwater. However, the domestic consumptive use is small by comparison to other PWB terms. The City of Moab Springs and Wells data base is extensive, and the patterns of daily and seasonally municipal use are well documented. The Mill Creek gage data at the Sheley diversion and below the Sheley diversion are some of the best and most accurate data available to this study. These hydrologic data sets offer insight in annual, seasonal, and daily variability of stream flows and were used to interpret and modify other useful data, for example Blanchard (1990). Finally, the Mill Creek outflow data, collected sparsely over time near the Powerhouse on the Mill Creek delta as single measurements in various studies, is the weakest link in the PWB that relies on this significant measurement. Again, the annual, seasonal, and daily measurement for this part of the water budget is necessary to improve on the PWB and is highly recommended for future water management decisions. Concurrently, the climate data used to estimate groundwater recharge as infiltration for precipitation (rain and snow, matrix and fracture zone) is some of the best and most accurate data available to this study. Making groundwater recharge by infiltration of precipitation the Water Budget Balance Term in annually averaged calculations provides an opportunity to explore various infiltration scenarios focused on evaluating different recharge mechanisms and establishing the importance of fracture zones in determining groundwater recharge from precipitation. 3.13 PWB and the GCMC Hydrologic System: Concerns Regarding Sustainability There are a number of potential threats to the sustainability of the GCMC hydrologic system and thus to the water supply of the City of Moab, both natural and man-made. Climate change may reduce water contributions originating from the La Sal Mountain subsystem, both in amounts and timing. In addition, water diversion projects to other watersheds, especially up- stream of the GCMC hydrologic system, will result in decreased surface water flows and groundwater recharge from losing streams. Impacts on the GCMC hydrologic system may also result from deforestation due to lumbering or fire (increased unchanneled surface runoff and stream flow peaks, and decreased stream base flow); increased forestation (increased ET; decrease of runoff and stream flows); and mining (increased or decreased stream flows and groundwater fluxes). Land use conversions/changes resulting in more or less consumptive uses need to be evaluated regarding the surface water output to Mill Creek at the southeast end of the GCMC hydrologic system. Increased consumptive use would result from increased urbanization (more wells, non-native vegetation), or increased irrigation. Any long term decline in inflows to the GCMC hydrologic system will result in further decline of outflows such as at Mill Creek Moab City Springs and Wells Study – Phase II HSA/HHI page 25 delta and the various springs, and will likely lead to decline in storage and subsequent lowering of groundwater levels and groundwater availability for phreatic consumption. 3.14 PWB and the GCMC Hydrologic System: Recommendations for Monitoring and Modelling Based upon associated uncertainties with estimates, the greatest cost-effective improvements to the PWB, primarily post-development, is better monitoring of the Mill Creek surface water system. Gaging stations at Blanchard’s stations MC03, MC07 (USGS 09183500 just above the current Sheley diversion), MC08 (USGS 09183600 below the Sheley diversion), MC 14 (above City Wells and Springs), MC15 (below City Wells and Springs), MC 21 (above Skakel protection zone), and MC22 (below Skakel protection zone) that recorded daily, seasonal, and annual information would solidify the measurements of the City of Moab protected areas. Water quality measurements would be recommended at these sites as well. In addition, continued monitoring of City Springs and Wells, including Skakel Spring, for daily, seasonal, and annual information regarding flow and water usage are recommended. An analysis of this and the data currently available, in addition to continued analysis of the climate data compared to the City Springs and Wells, and Skakel Spring, is recommended as a future part of this study. Mathematical groundwater modelling using the USGS Finite Difference MODFLOW Model or other integrated finite difference or finite element groundwater or groundwater/surface water models has been proposed in the past to quantify the GCMC hydrologic system. This study estimates both pre-development (steady state) and post-development (transient) water budgets that would be useful for the calibration of these types of models. Phase 1 of the current study, HESA of the GCMC hydrologic system, provides a surface water and groundwater conceptual model that would be useful for the design, implementation, and calibration for these types of models. However, the HESA revealed that the GCMC groundwater system was complex being both matrix and fracture-driven, and that the design, implementation, and calibration of this type of model is neither practical nor cost-effective at this time. Given the uncertainties with the data available, the results would tend to be questionable and non- defendable. A more practical and defendable mathematical groundwater model would focus on the Spanish Valley aquifer system. The PWB of the GCMC groundwater system would provide inputs into that model, and the HESA of the GCMC groundwater system would provide boundary conditions for that model. Moab City Springs and Wells Study – Phase II HSA/HHI page 26 WATER BUDGET COMPONENT IN (ac-ft/yr) OUT (ac-ft/yr) Recharge from precipitation (about 3.8 inch across WB area) Closing term 9155 (approx. 30% of precipitation) - Groundwater underflow at upper Mill Creek boundary (French drain) 4 0 Direct runoff from precipitation to streams from storms + local snowmelt within budget area 0 - Mill Creek inflow above later location of Sheley diversion At location Sheley diversion using USGS 1954- 2017 gage data 7546 - Irrigation return flow + septic tank infiltration 0 - Consumptive use crops - 0 Consumptive use riparian vegetation Low estimate from appendix A - 4009 Springs (including Skakel) Assumed maximum sustained discharge (based on water rights data) - 2325 Municipal use Produced City Springs & Wells (data from City) - 1364 Domestic consumptive use maximum (based on water rights data) - 80 Sheley diversion - 0 Mill Creek outflow at delta USGS gage data adjusted using flow rate decline along Mill Creek plus flow rate in North Fork according Blanchard 1990) - 8927 TOTALS 16705 16705 Table 1a. Preliminary pre-development water budget (surface water + groundwater) estimates for GCMC project area using low estimate for consumptive use by phreatophytes. Moab City Springs and Wells Study – Phase II HSA/HHI page 27 WATER BUDGET COMPONENT IN (ac-ft/yr) OUT (ac-ft/yr) Recharge from precipitation (About 3.9 inch across WB area) From Table 1a 9155 (approx. 31% of precipitation) - Groundwater underflow at upper Mill Creek boundary (French drain) 4 0 Direct runoff from precipitation to streams from storms + local snowmelt within budget area 0 - Mill Creek inflow above Sheley diversion location Above Sheley diversion using USGS 2003-2017 gage data 6814 - Irrigation return flow + septic tank infiltration 0 - Consumptive use crops - 0 Consumptive use riparian vegetation Low estimate from appendix A - 4009 Springs (including Skakel) Assumed 20% decline from pre-development discharge listed in Table 1a - 1860 Municipal use Produced City Springs & Wells (data from City) - 1875 Domestic consumptive use maximum (based on water rights data; adjusted for growth) - 120 Sheley diversion USGS gage data above Sheley diversion minus USGS gage data below Sheley diversion 2004- 2017 - 3665 Mill Creek outflow at delta USGS gage data adjusted using flow rate decline along Mill Creek plus flow rate in North Fork according Blanchard 1990) - 5317 Change of storage (Release from groundwater reservoir storage) Closing term Total area 28,279 acre 873 (less than 0.4 inch across entire WB area) - TOTALS 16846 16846 Table 1b. Preliminary post-development water budget (surface water + groundwater) estimates for GCMC project area using low estimate for consumptive use by phreatophytes. Moab City Springs and Wells Study – Phase II HSA/HHI page 28 WATER BUDGET COMPONENT IN (ac-ft/yr) OUT (ac-ft/yr) Recharge from precipitation (about 3.8 inch across WB area) Closing term 11339 (approx. 37% of precipitation) - Groundwater underflow at upper Mill Creek boundary (French drain) 4 0 Direct runoff from precipitation to streams from storms + local snowmelt within budget area 0 - Mill Creek inflow above later location of Sheley diversion At location Sheley diversion using USGS 1954- 2017 gage data 7546 - Irrigation return flow + septic tank infiltration 0 - Consumptive use crops - 0 Consumptive use riparian vegetation Low estimate from appendix A - 6193 Springs (including Skakel) Assumed maximum sustained discharge (based on water rights data) - 2325 Municipal use Produced City Springs & Wells (data from City) - 1364 Domestic consumptive use maximum (based on water rights data) - 80 Sheley diversion - 0 Mill Creek outflow at delta USGS gage data adjusted using flow rate decline along Mill Creek plus flow rate in North Fork according Blanchard 1990) - 8927 TOTALS 18889 18889 Table 2a. Preliminary pre-development water budget (surface water + groundwater) estimates for GCMC project area using high estimate for consumptive use by phreatophytes. Moab City Springs and Wells Study – Phase II HSA/HHI page 29 WATER BUDGET COMPONENT IN (ac-ft/yr) OUT (ac-ft/yr) Recharge from precipitation (About 3.9 inch across WB area) From Table 1a 11339 (approx. 39% of precipitation) - Groundwater underflow at upper Mill Creek boundary (French drain) 4 0 Direct runoff from precipitation to streams from storms + local snowmelt within budget area 0 - Mill Creek inflow above Sheley diversion location Above Sheley diversion using USGS 2003-2017 gage data 6814 - Irrigation return flow + septic tank infiltration 0 - Consumptive use crops - 0 Consumptive use riparian vegetation Low estimate from appendix A - 6193 Springs (including Skakel) Assumed 20% decline from pre-development discharge listed in Table 1a - 1860 Municipal use Produced City Springs & Wells (data from City) - 1875 Domestic consumptive use maximum (based on water rights data; adjusted for growth) - 120 Sheley diversion USGS gage data above Sheley diversion minus USGS gage data below Sheley diversion 2004- 2017 - 3665 Mill Creek outflow at delta USGS gage data adjusted using flow rate decline along Mill Creek plus flow rate in North Fork according Blanchard 1990) - 5317 Change of storage (Release from groundwater reservoir storage) Closing term Total area 28,279 acre 873 (less than 0.4 inch across entire WB area) - TOTALS 19030 19030 Table 2b. Preliminary post-development water budget (surface water + groundwater) estimates for GCMC project area using high estimate for consumptive use by phreatophytes. Moab City Springs and Wells Study – Phase II HSA/HHI page 30 4 PRELIMINARY GROUNDWATER STORAGE CALCULATIONS FOR THE GCMC HYDROLOGIC SYSTEM 4.1Groundwater Storage Quantification Groundwater is potentially stored, either as part of the saturated zone of the aquifer or the unsaturated zone above the aquifer where potentially recharge is occurring, in the pore spaces between the sand grains of unconsolidated eolian, pedogenic, colluvial, or alluvial materials (Qes, Qls, or Qal), in the pore spaces of the sedimentary bedrock, or in the multiple-scale hydrofractures including fractures, fracture zones, bedding planes, faults, or fault zones. Groundwater that is stored in the pore spaces is considered matrix water and may be in considerable amounts in unconsolidated materials (such as the Mill Creek alluvium and delta) or may be in very small amounts in well consolidated bedrock (such as the non-fractured Glen Canyon Group aquifer). Groundwater that is stored in the hydrostructures may be in very small amounts in microfractures or may be in considerable amounts in large scale fracture and faults zones (for example, the Kayenta Fault Zone and the Mill Creek Fracture Zone). Most of the unconsolidated materials that form the Eolian deposits and soils of the Sand Flats area, for example, are unsaturated and the amount of groundwater storage calculated there is small. By comparison, the unconsolidated materials in the Mill Creek gorge are saturated, and their storage is significant as indicated by the extensive phreatophyte vegetation that is observed. Groundwater scientists and engineers measure the amount of storage in aquifers not only based upon the hydrogeology, hydrostructures, and connectivity, but also on the volume and hydraulics of the groundwater system. Storativity or the storage coefficient is the volume of water released from storage per unit decline in hydraulic head in the aquifer, per unit area of the aquifer. Storativity is a dimensionless quantity, and ranges between 0 and the effective porosity of the aquifer. For a confined aquifer or aquitard, storativity is the vertically integrated specific storage value. Specific storage is the volume of water released from one unit volume of the aquifer under one unit decline in head. This is related to both the compressibility of the aquifer and the compressibility of the water itself. Volumetric specific storage (or volume specific storage) is the volume of water that an aquifer releases from storage, per volume of aquifer, per unit decline in hydraulic head (Freeze and Cherry, 1979). In hydrogeology, volumetric specific storage is much more commonly encountered than mass specific storage. Consequently, the term specific storage generally refers to volumetric specific storage. The compressibility terms relate a given change in stress to a change in volume. Specific yield, also known as the drainable porosity, is a ratio, less than or equal to the effective porosity, indicating the volumetric fraction of the bulk aquifer volume that a given aquifer will yield when all the water is allowed to drain out of it under the forces of gravity. Specific yield is primarily used for unconfined aquifers since the elastic storage component is relatively small and usually has an insignificant contribution. Specific yield can be close to effective porosity, but there are several subtle things which make this value more complicated than it seems. Some water always remains in the formation, even after drainage; it clings to the grains of sand and clay in the formation. Also, the value of specific yield may not be fully realized for a very long time, due to complications caused by unsaturated flow. Moab City Springs and Wells Study – Phase II HSA/HHI page 31 4.2 Approach and Calculation of Groundwater Storage for the Glen Canyon Group Aquifer The Glen Canyon Group Aquifer is a complex mix of nonfractured, fractured and faulted Entrada Sandstone (Je) and Glen Canyon Group Formations (Navajo, Kayenta, Wingate; Jgc), Eolian Sand (Qes), and hydrostructures (fault and fracture zones) which form the robust groundwater system supporting the GCMC hydrologic system. The Glen Canyon Group bedrock has both matrix flow and fracture flow. The matrix flow has ranges estimated from 0.1 – 0.3 m/day (Jobin, 1962; Blanchard, 1990; Lowe and others, 2007); and the fracture flow can be as high as 25 m/day (88 ft/day) (Freethey and Cordy, 1991). Therefore, fracture flow will dominate travel times and will also be most important for estimating groundwater storage. The Glen Canyon Group groundwater system is mostly unconfined or water table conditions and is characterized with specific yield estimates. The Glen Canyon Group bedrock has both matrix specific yield (small) estimates and fracture specific yield (large) estimates. The matrix specific yield estimates range from 1.0 – 10%; the fracture flow specific yield estimates range from 10 – 40% (Appendix A). Therefore, fracture flow areas will be most important for estimating groundwater storage and will be the areas that need the most protection for water quality and water quantity. The GCMC groundwater system is classified as five different hydro zone types of storage based on the hydrogeology and hydrostructures identified (see Figures 10a, 10b and 12 for hydro zone location): 1) Zone 2: Riparian Fracture Zone (High-K zone), fractured canyon storage, area variable, depth 500 feet (well log based), specific yield (Sy) range 20% – 40%; 2) Zone 3: Matrix, matrix storage, area variable, depth less than 100 feet except two areas 300 feet, specific yield (Sy) range variable with area 1% - 10%, 10%-20%, 20%-40%; 3) Zone 4: (Riparian) Dry Wash, fractured canyon dry wash storage, area variable, depth ranges from 300 feet – 500 feet, specific yield (Sy) range 10% -50% with three areas 50%; and 4) Zone 5: Fracture Enhanced Matrix, fracture enhanced matrix storage, area variable, depth ranges from 300 feet – 500 feet, specific yield (Sy) range 10% -50% with most areas 50% (Appendix A). Low variable storage was estimated using low Sy percentages as a minimum, and high variable storage was estimated using the high Sy percentages as a maximum. Each hydro zone had an estimated volume (GIS area multiplied by depth), and the hydro zone volume was multiplied by the hydro zone Sy to yield a hydro zone storage value (Appendix A). The calculations show that the GCMC groundwater system has a variable storage low of 153,144 ac-ft, and a variable storage high of 306,288 ac-ft (Appendix A). Hydro zones 2 and 5 (Figures 10a, 10b and 12) had the largest amount of storage with 38,835/77,670 ac-ft and 60,759/121,518 ac-ft respectively. These hydro zones are located along the critical groundwater flow paths that directly affect the yields and water quality of Skakel Spring, and the City of Moab Springs and Wells (Figures 10a and 10b). The earlier City of Moab Springs and Well Protection Plans previously identified these hydro zones as critical (Figure 1), and an update to these plans will be completed in Phase 3 of this project. In Section 3.11, the post-development water budget scenarios presented in Tables 1b and 2b incorporate the Sheley Diversion outtake of 3665 ac-ft/yr, and shows a deficit of 873 ac-ft/yr that is removed from groundwater storage on an average year. This amounts to about a 0.6% reduction of variable storage low, and 0.3% reduction of variable storage high per year at the Moab City Springs and Wells Study – Phase II HSA/HHI page 32 current water use. Given the margin of error, this suggests that under the current water usage, the City of Moab is not significantly impacting the storage of the GCMC hydrologic system. In fact, if this estimate is combined with the deficit of 873 ac-ft/yr on an average year, it would take 175 years to deplete the actual variable storage estimate, which is highly unlikely. It should be cautioned that the storage or underground reservoir is primarily a measure of how robust and sustainable the GCMC hydrologic system is under the current climatic and human use conditions. If the reservoir is significantly reduced by aquifer development, the hydraulics of the system will be affected initially by stream flows (riparian habitat both aquatic and vegetation), and by a rapid reduction of Spring flows and Well yields. In addition, the effects of reduced stream flows in Mill Creek through diversion or climate change will rapidly affect the recharge and storage functions of hydro zones 2 and 5, which are critical to Skakel Spring, and the City of Moab Springs and Wells. 4.3 Storage and the GCMC Hydrologic System: Discussion of Uncertainty There are many uncertainties in these preliminary calculations, so further analysis is needed, benefitting from more rigorous and continuous data collection. The primary significance of the storage calculations is that there is a significant amount of groundwater stored in the GCMC hydrologic system, particularly in hydro zones 2 and 5, that is directly connected to the City of Moab Wells and Springs, and the Skakel Spring. This storage is accumulated by groundwater recharge from infiltration of precipitation, and by losing reaches of Mill Creek, particularly in hydro zones 2 and 5. The largest uncertainties in the storage calculations is the correct delineation of each hydro zone area (volume), and the correct attribution of specific yield to each hydro zone. In order to reduce uncertainty, Specific yield ranges were assigned to each hydro zone based on published results of other studies, and hydrogeologic judgement by the investigators. Basically, the pre-development PWB represents a stable system that is equilibrated between inputs and outputs, and may have short-term deficits alleviated by decline in storage which in turn is replenished in wet years. The post-development PWB shows a long-term deficit which is compensated by a continuous release from storage, which may eventually, or may not at all, be compensated by extra recharge in wet years. It should be noted that the decline in storage is not equally distributed across the PWB area and may focus on the area of pronounced withdrawals. Moab City Springs and Wells Study – Phase II HSA/HHI page 33 5. SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS This report presents the findings of Phase 2 of a 3-phase project focused on improving the understanding of the hydrogeological setting of the water supply sources for the City of Moab, the quantification of the water resources available to the City, and updating the City springs and wells protection against contamination. In Phase 1, a Hydrologic and Environmental System Analysis (HESA) of the Mill Creek and Pack Creek watersheds was performed to identify the hydrological systems of specific importance to the sustainability of the Moab City springs and wells as a water supply for the City. It was concluded that the City’s water supply was mainly dependent on the hydrologic system formed by the Mill Creek Watershed and the Glen Canyon aquifer underlying the Sand Flats region. This hydrologic system, referred to as the Glen Canyon Group Mill Creek (GCMC) hydrologic system, was chosen in Phase 2 of the project as the setting for the quantification of the water resources available to the City, resulting in a preliminary global water budget of the GCMC hydrologic system. It is a preliminary water budget as there are many uncertainties with respect to the determination of the individual components given the sparseness of relevant published data. The Glen Canyon Group Mill Creek (GCMC) hydrologic system is a complex mix of fractured and faulted Entrada Sandstone and Glen Canyon Group, Eolian Sand, and hydro- structures (fault and fracture zones) which form the robust groundwater system and surface water system that is directly connected to the City of Moab springs and wells in the vicinity of the golf course and to the Skakel Spring. The HESA completed in phase 1 showed that the GCMC hydrologic system is a well-defined and delineated, integrated surface water and groundwater system for which the boundary conditions and internal surface watergroundwater interactions are well-understood. To quantify the water resources available for the City of Moab’s water supply, a preliminary (global) water budget (PWB) has been developed for the GCMC hydrologic system, focused on the external inputs (inflows) and outputs (outflows) of the hydrologic system. In addition, an analysis was made of the storage capacity of the Glen Canyon aquifer in this area. The area to which the PWB applies is based, among others, on the location of City of Moab springs and wells, the location of stream gages in Mill Creek, the location of the Sheley diversion, and the natural boundaries of the GCMC hydrologic system, and covers almost the entire GCMC hydrologic system. It is bounded by the Glen Canyon Group Grandstaff Creek (GCGC) hydrologic system to the north; the Morrison Formation to the east and southeast; and the Pack Creek Lower Alluvium (PCLA) hydrologic system to the west and southwest as defined in the Phase 1 HESA. The significant inputs of the PWB are: Mill Creek surface water at the SE corner of the water balance area; Mill Creek groundwater flux, called groundwater underflow, in the fractured Glen Canyon hydrogeologic units at the SE corner of the water balance area; and recharge by infiltration of precipitation (rain and snow) across the entire GCMC area. The outputs of the PWB are: Mill Creek surface water outflow into the northern end of Spanish Valley along the Mill Creek delta just downstream from the Powerhouse; evapotranspiration or consumptive use by native phreatophytes (cottonwoods, willows, tamarisk, and other riparian species); groundwater discharge from the fractured GCMC hydrogeologic units to major springs, including the Moab City springs and Skakel Spring, and domestic consumptive use by irrigation, livestock and domestic wells. Moab City Springs and Wells Study – Phase II HSA/HHI page 34 The Phase 1 HESA showed that there are two distinct periods of anthropogenic stresses in the GCMC hydrologic system: 1) pre-1980s; and 2) from early 1980s until present. During the pre-1980s limited municipal, domestic and irrigation demand left most of the system in its natural state, a period that in this report is referred to as the pre-development phase. In the early 1980s the coming on-line of the Sheley diversion, together with the initiation of a rather steady increase in municipal and domestic water use, represented a significant increase in the anthropogenic withdrawals from the GCMC hydrologic system, which continues to the present day. This latter period is in this report referred to as the post-development phase. A set of preliminary water budgets have been developed for each of these two stress periods The pre-development GCMC water budget has as inputs: 1) Groundwater recharge from precipitation; 2) Groundwater underflow along the Mill Creek fracture zone; and 3) Mill Creek inflow at the point of entry to the GCMC hydrologic system above the Sheley diversion. Pre- development GCMC water budget outputs are: 1) Consumptive use by riparian vegetation; 2) Springs on the Kayenta Fault Zone (including Skakel); 3) Municipal water use (City of Moab Springs and Wells at the golf course); 4) Domestic consumptive use (private wells); and 5) Mill Creek outflow at the delta. The post-development GCMC water budget has the same type of inputs as the pre-development water budget, but has an additional outflow term, the Sheley diversion. Although the existing precipitation data set for the GCMC area is extensive and spatially detailed, to use the precipitation data in calculating groundwater recharge is not straightforward. In this study, two approaches are taken: 1) evaluating a series of potential recharge scenarios to delineate the recharge bounds based on detailed knowledge of the hydrogeology using both the 1971-2000 and 1981-2010 climate data sets; and 2) using recharge as the closing or balancing term in the preliminary pre-development water budget. The latter value is then used as an input for the preliminary post-development water budget, in which the closing term is a deficit inflow assigned to water released from aquifer storage. In order to establish the recharge bounds, to calculate consumptive use by riparian vegetation, and to determine groundwater storage characteristics, the GCMC hydrologic system was spatially divided into 5 types of hydro zones based upon the hydrogeology and geomorphology, groundwater and surface water hydrology, and distribution of phreatophytes. Hydro zone 1 is the phreatophyte zone and represents gaining stream reaches and phreatic consumptive use areas. Hydro zone 2 is the riparian high-K fracture zone (acting as a French drain) and includes the relatively rapid fractured canyon recharge and significant groundwater storage capabilities. Note that there is a partial overlap of Hydro zone 1 and Hydro zone 2. Hydro zone 3 is the matrix (non-fractured) zone and represents very slow recharge and small storage. Hydro zone 4 is the dry wash high-K fracture zone with fractured canyon/dry wash recharge and storage. This zone is noted as having insignificant phreatophyte discharge. Hydro zone 5 is the fracture-enhanced high-K matrix zone, characterized by fracture-enhanced recharge and storage. These zones have been mapped from aerial photography and added to a GIS data base to facilitate spatially distributed evaluation of water budget terms. Two scenarios were calculated for both the pre-development and post-development water budgets based on lower and upper estimates of consumptive use by phreatophytes as listed in the Moab City Springs and Wells Study – Phase II HSA/HHI page 35 literature for conditions found in the GCMC hydrologic system (PWB terms of 4009 and 6193 ac-ft/yr, respectively). In the low estimate of consumptive use by phreatophytes scenario, recharge is estimated to be 9155 acre-ft/yr, amounting to infiltration of approximately 30% of precipitation, in line with the highest calculated recharge component. In the high estimate of consumptive use by phreatophytes scenario, recharge is estimated to be 11339 ac-ft/yr, amounting to infiltration of approximately 37% of precipitation, which is well above the highest calculated recharge component. It is likely that the lower estimate of phreatophyte consumptive use is more realistic as it results in a defensible recharge rate in this fault- and fracture zones- dominated hydrologic system. Preliminary water budget terms for Mill Creek inflow and outflow were adjusted between pre-and post-development calculations in accordance with stream gage data, while municipal use terms were based on data provided by the City of Moab. Domestic use and spring runoff terms were compiled from the Utah water rights data base. The post-development scenarios incorporate the Sheley diversion with an average annual outtake of 3665 ac-ft/yr, which is approximately 22% of the yearly budget for low estimate of consumptive use by phreatophytes, and about 19% of the yearly budget for high estimate of consumptive use by phreatophytes. The preliminary post-development water budget calculations show a deficit of 873 ac-ft/yr, representing the amount of water removed from groundwater storage in an average year. This release from storage may be compensated over time by increased recharge during above average precipitation years, or by recharge from Mill Creek (losing stretches) into the GCMC aquifer due to increased runoff in upgradient stretches of Mill Creek from larger than normal snowpack. The PWB shows that there is a significant amount of water contributed to the GCMC hydrologic system from the La Sal Mountain hydrological systems as surface water through the upper reaches of Mill Creek, or in percentages of pre-development input into the GCMC hydrologic system: surface water (inflow into Mill Creek from La Sal Mountain system) counts for approximately 45%; local recharge from precipitation or ephemeral channel loss within the GCMC area counts for 55%; and groundwater underflow counts for less than 1%. The PWB also puts an upper bound on the total multi-year annually averaged inflow into the system of about 16,500 to 19,000 acre-ft. Any decline in upstream flows in Mill Creek from natural or man- made causes will have an immediate impact on the outflows of the GCMC hydrologic system and poses a potential threat to the sustainability of the City of Moab’s water supply. In a preliminary assessment of the effect of the Sheley diversion on the water budget of the GCMC hydrologic system, the diversion annually takes out 22% of the total inflow to the GCMC hydrologic system and has resulted in a 40% reduction of Mill Creek outflows towards Spanish Valley, and a 20% reduction of springs and seeps discharge. Many of the components of the PWB calculations include large uncertainties. The most reliable data are the USGS stream flow data in Mill Creek at and below the Sheley diversion, the springs and wells production data from the City of Moab, and the precipitation data from NOAA used to develop various recharge scenarios. All other data sets provide a “snap shot” of a particular variable in time as they were gathered at various, non-comparable moments in time and should be considered a first estimate, subject to refining by further field studies. Climate data can be refined by limiting the pre-development climate data set from the period 1971-2000 to the Moab City Springs and Wells Study – Phase II HSA/HHI page 36 period 1971-1980. This also provides more insight in the effects of climate change on the GCMC water budget. Another area where significant cost-effective improvements to the PWB can be made, is more detailed and frequent monitoring of the Mill Creek surface water system, specifically in the vicinity of the Moab City wells and springs and above and below the area where the Skakel source protection zone intercedes Mill Creek. Finally, more detailed monitoring of selected, “representative” springs, both to the north and south of the Mill Creek delta, should be initiated to obtain an indication of the relationships over time between spring discharge, climate variations, and Mill Creek runoff, as well as an insight in the resilience of the GCMC hydrologic system to external stresses. The Glen Canyon Group groundwater system is mostl y unconfined, i.e., having a readily fluctuating water table, and the aquifer storativity is characterized by so-called specific yield. The Glen Canyon Group bedrock has both matrix specific yield (small) and fracture specific yield (large). The matrix specific yield estimates range from 1.0 – 10%; the fracture specific yield estimates range from 10 – 40%. As there is a significant presence of fracture zones in the GCMC system, fractures are the dominant feature in determining available groundwater storage. Using the hydro zones defined for this project, each of zones 2 through 5 of the GCMC system was assigned a range for its specific yield. The minimum value for the system-wide groundwater storage was estimated using the low specific yield values for each zone, and the maximum value for the system-wide groundwater storage was estimated using the high specific yield values for each zone. Each hydro zone had an estimated volume based on a GIS-defined area multiplied by an averaged saturated depth and assigned specific yield to obtain the hydro zone storage value. These calculations show that the GCMC groundwater system has a storage minimum of about 153,000 ac-ft, and a storage maximum of about 306,000 ac-ft, indicating significant uncertainty in the actual storage available in the GCMC groundwater system. Hydro zones 2 and 5, located along the groundwater flow paths that directly affect the yields and water quality of Skakel Spring, and the City of Moab springs and wells at the golf course, had the largest amount of storage. The current City of Moab source protection plans identify these hydro zones as critical, and an update to these plans will be completed in Phase 3 of this project. Moab City Springs and Wells Study – Phase II HSA/HHI page 37 6. REFERENCES ASTM Standard D5979, 1996 (2008). Standard Guide for Conceptualization and Characterization of Groundwater Systems. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, DOI: 10.1520/D5979-96R08. Blanchard, P.J. 1990. Ground-Water Conditions in the Grand County Area, Utah, With Emphasis on the Mill Creek-Spanish Valley Area. Utah Dept. of Natural Resources, Technical Publication 100, 69p. Crowley, E., 2004, Evapotranspiration and the Wetland Water Budget, Matheson Wetland Preserve, Moab, Utah. Appendix II. In: Gardner, P.M. and Solomon, D.K., 2004, Summary Report of Hydrologic Studies of the Scott M. Matheson Wetland Preserve, Dept. of Geology and Geophysics, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah. Ford, C. and A. Grandy. 1997. Records of Water Well Levels and Water Quality in Alluvial and Bedrock Aquifers, Castle Creek Seepage Study, Precipitation, and Water Uses for Castle Valley, Grand County, Utah. Utah Division of Water Rights, Hydrologic Data Report No.1. Ford, C. 2006. Water Resources of the Castle Valley Area, Grand County, Utah. Utah Division of Water Rights, Technical Publication 490. Freethey, G.W., and G.E. Cordy. 1991. Geohydrology of Mesozoic Rocks in the Upper Colorado River Basin in Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming, Excluding the San Juan Basin. U.S. Geological Survey. Professional Paper 1411-C. Freeze, R.A., and J.A. Cherry. 1979. Groundwater. Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J. Gatewood, J. S., T.W. Robinson, B.R. Colby, J. Hem., and L. Halpenny 1950. Use of Water by Bottom-Land Vegetation in Lower Safford Valley, Arizona, U.S. Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 1103. Jobin, D.A. 1962. Relation of the Transmissive Character of the Sedimentary Rocks of the Colorado Plateau to the Distribution of Uranium Deposits: U.S, Geological Survey Bulletin 1124. Kolm, K.E., P K.M. van der Heijde, J.S. Downey, and E.D. Gutentag. 1996. Conceptualization and Characterization of Ground-Water Systems. In: Subsurface Fluid-Flow (Ground Water and Vadose Zone) Modeling, ASTM STP 1288, J. D. Ritchey and J. O. Rumbaugh, eds., American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA Kolm, K.E., and P.K.M. van der Heijde. 2018. Hydrologic and Hydrogeologic Assessment of the Surface Water and Groundwater Resources Affecting the Moab City Springs and Wells, Moab, Utah: Phase 1: Hydrologic and Environmental System Analysis (HESA) and Conceptual Models. Report prepared for City of Moab, Utah. Moab City Springs and Wells Study – Phase II HSA/HHI page 38 Lowe, M., J. Wallace, S. M. Kirby, and C.E. Bishop. 2007. The Hydrogeology of Moab- Spanish Valley, Grand and San Juan Counties, Utah with Emphasis on Maps for Water Resource Management and Land Use Planning. Special Study 120. Utah Geological Survey, a Division of Utah Department of Natural Resources. Meyboom, P. 1964. Three Observations on Streamflow Depletion by Phreatophytes. Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 248–261. Muckel, D. C., and H.F. Blaney. 1945. Utilization of the Waters of Lower San Luis Rey Valley, San Diego County, California. U.S. Soil Conservation Service, Division of Irrigation, Los Angeles, California. NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, 2017. https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo- web/datatools/findstation. Accessed 2017, 2018, 2019. NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service), 2017. Geospatial Data Gateway, https://gdg.sc.egov.usda.gov/. Accessed at various dates in 2017, 2018, 2019. Sunrise Engineering 2002 Drinking Water Source Protection Plan Chapman Well. Report prepared for Grand Water and Sewer Service Agency, Moab, Utah. USGS_NWIS, 2017. U.S. Geological Survey, National Water Information System, http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis. Accessed at various dates in 2017, 2018, 2019 Utah AGRC, 2017. Utah Automated Geographic Reference Center. https://gis.utah.gov/data/#. Accessed at various dates in 2017, 2018, 2019. Utah Water Rights Data Base UDWR, Accessed through Utah AGRC (wrpod.zip file) and map search at https://maps.waterrights.utah.gov/EsriMap/map.asp at various dates in 2017, 2018., 2019. Moab City Springs and Wells Study – Phase II HSA/HHI page 39 APPENDIX A. RECHARGE AND STORAGE CALCULATIONS FOR HYDRO ZONES IN THE GCMC HYDROLOGIC SYSTEM OBJECTID (from GIS)Name Hydro Type Area (GIS) Acres Hydro Function Sub-Category Average Annual Precipitation (GIS) 1971-2000 Inches Average Annual Precipitation (GIS) 1971-2000 Acre-ft Average Annual Precipitation (GIS) 1981-2010 Inches Average Annual Precipitation (GIS) 1981-2010 Acre-ft Phreatic Consumptive Use in/yr Depth ft K ft/day Sy % Recharge % of Precip Recharge 1971-2000 10% of P Acre-ft/yr Recharge 1971-2000 20% of P Acre-ft/yr Recharge 1971-2000 30% of P Acre-ft/yr Recharge 1981-2010 10% of P Acre-ft/yr Recharge 1981-2010 20% of P Acre-ft/yr Recharge 1981-2010 30% of P Acre-ft/yr Phreatic Consumptive Use Low Acre-ft/yr Phreatic Consumptive Use High Acre-ft/yr Total Water Content Low Acre-ft Total Water Content High Acre-ft 24 Buck Holder Draw 1 278 Discharge Phreatophytes, Gaining Stream Reaches 15 - 19 372 16 370 60 - 92.7 25 - 30 1389 2146 29 Mill Creek Middle 1 286 Discharge Phreatophytes, Gaining Stream Reaches 9 - 27 641 9 - 26 620 60 - 92.7 25 - 30 1429 2207 46 Rill Creek 1 56 Discharge Phreatophytes, Gaining Stream Reaches 15 - 17 71 14 -16 69 60 - 92.7 25 - 30 281 434 54 Mill Creek Lower 1 12 Discharge Phreatophytes, Gaining Stream Reaches 9 9 9 9 60 - 92.7 25 - 30 61 94 56 North Fork - Mill Creek 1 170 Discharge Phreatophytes, Gaining Stream Reaches 9 - 15 175 9 - 15 165 60 - 92.7 25 - 30 850 1313 5 Rill Creek 2 152 Recharge, Storage Fractured Canyon Recharge and Storage, Phreatophyte Discharge 15 - 17 193 14 - 16 186 300 10 to 50 20 - 40 10 to 30 19 39 58 19 37 56 9110 18220 10 Buck Holder Draw 2 1616 Recharge, Storage Fractured Canyon Recharge and Storage, Phreatophyte Discharge 13 - 19 2091 12 - 20 2056 300 10 to 50 20 - 40 10 to 30 209 418 627 206 411 617 96984 193968 12 Mill Creek Middle 2 1354 Recharge, Storage Fractured Canyon Recharge and Storage, Phreatophyte Discharge 9 - 27 2259 9 - 26 2179 500 50 20 - 40 10 to 30 226 452 678 218 436 654 135430 270860 26 North Fork - Mill Creek 2 1387 Recharge, Storage Fractured Canyon Recharge and Storage, Phreatophyte Discharge 9 - 17 1470 9 - 16 1408 500 50 20 - 40 10 to 30 147 294 441 141 282 422 138717 277434 53 Mill Creek Lower 2 81 Recharge, Storage Fractured Canyon Recharge and Storage, Phreatophyte Discharge 9 61 9 61 500 50 20 - 40 10 to 30 6 12 18 6 12 18 8108 16216 33 JUOT South 3 2517 Recharge, Storage Matrix Recharge and Storage 11 - 13 2417 10 - 12 2327 less than 100 1 to 10 10 to 20 10 to 30 242 483 725 233 465 698 25173 50346 35 Kayenta F/F Zone Middle East 3 431 Recharge, Storage Matrix Recharge and Storage 9 - 11 358 9 - 10 338 less than 100 1 to 10 10 to 20 10 to 30 36 72 108 34 68 101 4309 8617 38 Matrix 3 4029 Recharge, Storage Matrix Recharge and Storage 13 - 16 4630 12 - 16 4468 300 10 to 50 20 - 40 10 to 30 463 926 1389 447 894 1340 241730 483461 57 Matrix 3 711 Recharge, Storage Matrix Recharge and Storage 11 - 15 763 11 - 14 727 less than 100 0.1 to 1.0 1.0 - 10 10 76 76 76 73 73 73 7111 14221 58 Matrix 3 3230 Recharge, Storage Matrix Recharge and Storage 15 - 16 4106 13 -15 3871 less than 100 0.1 to 1.0 1.0 - 10 10 411 411 411 387 387 387 32300 64600 60 Burk Holder Draw - Mesa 3 100 Recharge, Storage Matrix Recharge and Storage 17 - 19 150 17 - 18 146 less than 100 0.1 - 1.0 1.0 - 10 10 15 15 15 15 15 15 995 1990 61 Matrix - Upper system 3 481 Recharge, Storage Matrix Recharge and Storage 13 -17 601 13 - 16 584 300 10 to 50 20 - 40 10 60 60 60 58 58 58 28880 57761 63 FEM Southwest 3 822 Recharge, Storage Matrix Recharge and Storage 11 - 13 890 11 - 13 838 less than 100 0.1 - 1.0 1.0 - 10 10 89 89 89 84 84 84 8216 16432 3 Rill Creek 4 315 Recharge, Storage Fractured Canyon, Dry Wash Recharge and Storage 11 - 15 332 11 - 14 315 500 50 20 - 40 10 to 30 33 66 100 32 63 95 31471 62942 9 North Fork - North 4 27 Recharge, Storage Fractured Canyon, Dry Wash Recharge and Storage 11 24 10 22 300 10 to 50 20 - 40 10 to 30 2 5 7 2 4 7 1594 3187 11 Buck Holder Draw 4 54 Recharge, Storage Fractured Canyon, Dry Wash Recharge and Storage 13 - 15 64 13 - 14 61 300 10 to 50 20 - 40 10 to 30 6 13 19 6 12 18 3234 6468 27 North Fork - Mill Creek 4 1163 Recharge, Storage Fractured Canyon, Dry Wash Recharge and Storage 13 - 19 1440 12 -21 1396 300 10 to 50 20 - 40 10 to 30 144 288 432 140 279 419 69781 139562 30 Mill Creek Middle 4 99 Recharge, Storage Fractured Canyon, Dry Wash Recharge and Storage 13 107 11 - 12 99 500 50 20 - 40 10 to 30 11 21 32 10 20 30 9911 19822 59 North Fork - Mill Creek 4 745 Recharge, Storage Fractured Canyon, Dry Wash Recharge and Storage 15 - 17 936 14 869 300 50 20 - 40 10 to 30 94 187 281 87 174 261 44688 89375 62 Dry Wash - Upper system 4 435 Recharge, Storage Fractured Canyon, Dry Wash Recharge and Storage 13 - 15 476 12 -14 475 300 10 to 50 20 - 40 10 to 30 48 95 143 48 95 143 26108 52215 8 FEM Northeast 5 1140 Recharge, Storage Fractured Enhanced Matrix Recharge and Storage 9 - 11 1014 9 - 11 965 300 10 to 50 20 - 40 10 to 30 101 203 304 97 193 290 68390 136781 32 Kayenta F/F Zone South 5 443 Recharge, Storage Fracture Enhanced Matrix Recharge and Storage 11 406 10 - 11 384 500 50 20 - 40 10 to 30 41 81 122 38 77 115 44341 88682 34 Springs, Moab Wells , Fracture Zone 5 1064 Recharge, Storage Fracture Enhanced Matrix Recharge and Storage 9 - 11 933 9 - 11 861 500 50 20 - 40 10 to 30 93 187 280 86 172 258 106442 212884 36 Kayenta F/F Zone Middle West 5 448 Recharge, Storage Fracture Enhanced Matrix Recharge and Storage 9 - 11 336 9 336 500 50 20 - 40 10 to 30 34 67 101 34 67 101 44795 89591 37 FEM Southeast 5 3436 Recharge, Storage Fracture Enhanced Matrix Recharge and Storage 9 - 15 3329 9 - 14 3146 300 10 to 50 20 - 40 10 to 30 333 666 999 315 629 944 206158 412316 49 Kayenta F/F Zone Northwest 5 1211 Recharge, Storage Fracture Enhanced Matrix Recharge and Storage 9 908 8 - 9 889 500 50 20 - 40 10 to 30 91 182 272 89 178 267 121109 242218 50 Kayenta F/F Zone Northeast 5 273 Recharge, Storage Fracture Enhanced Matrix Recharge and Storage 9 204 9 204 300 50 20 - 40 10 to 30 20 41 61 20 41 61 16354 32709 Total 28565 31769 30442 type 1 is subarea of type 2 Type 1 994 1275 1241 Net Total (No type 1)27571 30494 29202 3050 5449 7848 2921 5225 7530 4009 6193 1531439 3062879 Hydro Zones (or Types): 1 - Phreatophytes 802 1268 1234 0 0 0 0 0 0 4009 6193 0 0 2 - Riparian Fracture Zone [High-K Zone]4591 6074 5890 607 1215 1822 589 1178 1767 0 0 388349 776698 3 - Matrix 12320 13915 13297 1392 2132 2873 1330 2043 2757 0 0 348714 697428 4 - (Riparian) Dry Wash 2837 3380 3237 338 676 1014 324 647 971 0 0 186786 373572 5 - Fracture Enhanced Matrix 8015 7131 6784 713 1426 2139 678 1357 2035 0 0 607590 1215181 Total 28565 31769 30442 3050 5449 7848 2921 5225 7530 4009 6193 1531439 3062879 type 1 is subarea of type 2 Type 1 994 1275 1241 Net Total (No type 1)27571 30494 29202 Moab City Springs and Wells Study – Phase II HSA/HHI page 40 APPENDIX B. SPRINGS IN THE GCMC HYDROLOGIC SYSTEM AS REPORTED BY THE UTAH STATE WATER RIGHTS DIVISION FID WRNUM SUMMARY_ST STATUS PRIORITY USES CFS ACFT LOCATION WIN OWNER WRLINK SOURCE 52 05-581 P DIL 1896 I 0.009 0 S1245 E665 NW 06 26S 22E SL 0 MARVELEE JOHNSON BREWER 05-581 Bliss Spring 54 05-583 P DIL 1896 I 0.009 0 S1245 E665 NW 06 26S 22E SL 0 PHILANDER C. MAXWELL 05-583 Bliss Spring 53 05-582 P DIL 1896 I 0.005 0 S1245 E665 NW 06 26S 22E SL 0 WALTER E. SHUTT 05-582 Bliss Spring 41 05-2893 P DIL 18880601 DIS 0 12.9 N3263 W858 S4 26 25S 21E SL 0 ELK CREEK CAMPGROUND LLC 05-2893 Goatman Springs and Seeps 47 05-458 P APPLWUC 19630227 DI 0.007 0 S611 E321 NW 16 26S 22E SL 0 JOE ROMERO 05-458 Joe Romero Spring #2 68 05-9 P APPLCERT 19100308 S 0.002 0 S820 W1255 N4 06 26S 22E SL 0 THOMAS B. FOY 05-9 Johnson Spring 15 05-1774 P DIL 1903 S 0.002 0 N765 E777 S4 31 25S 23E SL 0 MOAB DISTRICT USA BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT 05-1774 Little Spring 27 05-2270 P APPLWUC 19890615 D 0 0.45 S1701 E997 W4 15 26S 22E SL 0 GEORGE S. WEIL 05-2270 Lloyd Somerville Spring 14 05-1706 P DIL 1896 DIS 0.015 0 S1701 E997 W4 15 26S 22E SL 0 MARY K. WILSON 05-1706 Lloyd Somerville Spring 20 05-2007 P DILCERT 1903 DIMO 0.21 0 S545 E204 W4 15 26S 22E SL 0 CITY OF MOAB 05-2007 McConkie Spring 64 05-753 P DIL 1903 DI 0.12 0 N1420 E410 S4 36 25S 21E SL 0 HAROLD C. STEWART 05-753 Perry Foy Spring 42 05-2987 P SHARCERT 19750127 I 0.112 4.23 S711 E1260 NW 08 26S 22E SL 0 THOMAS A. JOHNSON LIVING TRUST 05-2987 Powerhouse Line Spring 37 05-2762 A FIXDAPP 19990526 I 1.25 0 S450 W225 NE 35 25S 21E SL 0 THE NATURE CONSERVANCY 05-2762 Skakel Spring 34 05-2740 A FIXDAPP 19990127 DIMO 1 0 S450 W225 NE 35 25S 21E SL 0 CITY OF MOAB 05-2740 Skakel Spring 72 05-2105 A APPLAPP 20050218 M 1.252 453.505 N2200 W222 E4 35 25S 21E SL 0 CITY OF MOAB a29873 Skakel Spring 50 05-578 P DIL 1896 IS 0.07 0 N1495 W285 S4 36 25S 21E SL 0 CHARLES A. STEEN 05-578 Snyder Spring 56 05-68 P APPLCERT 19440228 DS 0.006 0 N1227 E695 W4 36 25S 21E SL 0 J. S. WESTWOOD 05-68 Spring Area 11 05-1281 P APPLWUC 19770315 DI 0.015 0 N1350 E50 S4 36 25S 21E SL 0 CHARLES E EVERY 05-1281 Stewart Spring 21 05-2008 P DILCERT 18960415 M 0.2 102 N170 W982 S4 15 26S 22E SL 0 CITY OF MOAB 05-2008 Surface Spring 32 05-251 P APPLCERT 19581020 M 0.207 0 N170 W982 S4 15 26S 22E SL 0 CITY OF MOAB 05-251 Surface Spring 29 05-2414 P APPLWUC 19921026 O 0.002 1.435 N480 W1380 SE 26 25S 21E SL 0 PALLADIUM FOUNDATION 05-2414 Unnamed Spring 57 05-70 P APPLCERT 19450313 S 0.001 0 S2706 W353 N4 15 26S 22E SL 0 ALBERT C. TAYLOR 05-70 Unnamed Spring 23 05-2035 P DIL 1900 DIS 0.033 0 N1185 W820 E4 16 26S 22E SL 0 GERDA STOLTZ 05-2035 Unnamed Spring 43 05-3073 P APPLCERT 20050824 DIS 0 2.013 S1127 E288 W4 15 26S 22E SL 0 GLEN J LATHROP 05-3073 Unnamed Spring 31 05-247 P APPLNPR 19581007 DI 0.015 0 S656 E389 NW 16 26S 22E SL 0 JOE D. ROMERO 05-247 Unnamed Spring 45 05-3316 P APPLCERT 20070425 IO 0 6.13 N1312 E5 S4 36 25S 21E SL 0 LINDY OTTINGER 05-3316 Unnamed Spring 16 05-1924 P DIL 1903 OS 0.002 0 N1150 E1250 SW 07 26S 23E SL 0 MOAB DISTRICT USA BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT 05-1924 Unnamed Spring 18 05-1939 P DIL 1903 OS 0.004 0 N1100 E1600 SW 07 26S 23E SL 0 MOAB DISTRICT USA BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT 05-1939 Unnamed Spring 6 05-1921 P DIL 1903 OS 0.006 0 N660 W660 S4 04 26S 23E SL 0 MOAB DISTRICT USA BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT 05-1921 Unnamed Spring 7 05-1940 P DIL 1903 OS 0.01 0 S660 W1980 E4 17 26S 23E SL 0 MOAB DISTRICT USA BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT 05-1940 Unnamed Spring 1 05-1893 P DIL 1903 OS 0.02 0 N660 E660 SW 03 26S 23E SL 0 MOAB DISTRICT USA BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT 05-1893 Unnamed Spring 17 05-1936 P DIL 1903 OS 0.03 0 N1100 E1800 SW 07 26S 23E SL 0 MOAB DISTRICT USA BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT 05-1936 Unnamed Spring 8 05-1941 P DIL 1903 OS 0.04 0 S660 W660 NE 18 26S 23E SL 0 MOAB DISTRICT USA BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT 05-1941 Unnamed Spring 48 05-51 P APPLCERT 19300929 I 0.029 0 N1413 E391 S4 36 25S 21E SL 0 PERRY E. FOY 05-51 Unnamed Spring 30 05-246 P APPLCERT 19581003 IO 0.017 0 S1998 E1860 NW 26 25S 21E SL 0 MOAB LIONS CLUB 05-246 Unnamed Spring Area 69 05-92 P APPLCERT 19511024 I 0.022 0 N307 W54 E4 16 26S 22E SL 0 PETE SHUMWAY 05-92 Unnamed Spring Area 10 05-122 P APPLCERT 19541006 DI 0 42.608 N203 W856 SE 08 26S 22E SL 0 CRYSTAL LEE DAY 05-122 Vicki`s Spring and Well 24 05-2102 P DIL 1898 IOS 0.075 24.768 S380 W450 NE 35 25S 21E SL 0 CLUB UTAH RESORT GROUP LLC 05-2102 Watercress Spring 36 05-2744 P DIL 1898 IOS 0.12 38.98 S380 W450 NE 35 25S 21E SL 0 CLUB UTAH RESORT GROUP LLC 05-2744 Watercress Spring 44 05-3113 A FIXDAPP 20051227 I 0.6 198 S380 W450 NE 35 25S 21E SL 0 THE NATURE CONSERVANCY 05-3113 Watercress Spring 46 05-3456 P DIL 1898 I 0.246 79.45 S380 W450 NE 35 25S 21E SL 0 THE NATURE CONVSERVANCY 05-3456 Watercress Spring 38 05-2780 P DIL 1898 I 0.039 12.702 S380 W450 NE 35 25S 21E SL 0 COLIN FRYER 05-2780 Watercress Spring Moab City Springs and Wells Study – Phase II HSA/HHI page 41 APPENDIX C-1. STREAM FLOW DATA AT USGS GAGES 09183500 AND 09183600 AT AND BELOW SHELEY TUNNEL: ANNUALLY AVERAGED FLOW IN CUSECS. Moab City Springs and Wells Study – Phase II HSA/HHI page 42 APPENDIX C-2. STREAM FLOW DATA AT USGS GAGES 09183500 AND 09183600 AT AND BELOW SHELEY TUNNEL: AVERAGED MONTHLY FLOW IN CUSECS. Page 1 of 1 April 22, 2019 MOAB CITY SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES APRIL 22, 2019--DRAFT Call to Order and Attendance: The Moab City Council held a Special Council Meeting on the above date in the City Council Chambers located at 217 East Center Street. The purpose of the meeting was for a budget workshop for the proposed Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Annual Budget. An audio recording is archived at http://www.utah.gov/pmn/index.html and a video recording is archived at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sxlJyty7n3s. Mayor Emily Niehaus called the meeting to order at 12:03 PM. In attendance were Councilmembers Rani Derasary, Tawny Knuteson-Boyd, Mike Duncan and Karen Guzman-Newton. Councilmember Kalen Jones did not attend. Also in attendance were City Manager Everitt, City Finance Director Rachel Stenta, Recorder Sommar Johnson, Assistant City Manager Joel Linares, City Engineer Chuck Williams, Street Superintendent Jeff Galley, Facilities Superintendent Chace Gholson, Public Works Administrative Assistant Marcy Mason, Assistant Engineer Eric Johanson, Communications and Outreach Director Lisa Church and Recorder/Project Specialist Eve Tallman. One member of the press attended. The workshop began with Williams introducing basic responsibilities of the engineering department along with the proposed Engineering budget. Next, Mason and Linares introduced the Public Works administrative budget followed by Linares and Galley explaining the scope of the Streets budget. Finally, Gholson presented the basic roles of the Facilities team and answered questions from Council including about the maintenance of the Scouting house, which was deeded to the City several years ago. The history and usage of the Center Street Gym was brought up. Mayor Niehaus asked about revenues including recreation fees and rents. Linares answered questions about facilities capital projects, specifically regarding the Gym. Adjournment: Councilmember Derasary moved to adjourn the meeting. Councilmember Karen Guzman-Newton seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Mayor Niehaus adjourned the meeting at 1:08 PM. APPROVED: __________________ ATTEST: ___________________ Emily S. Niehaus, Mayor Sommar Johnson, City Recorder Page 1 of 4 -- April 23, 2019 MOAB CITY COUNCIL MINUTES--DRAFT REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 23, 2019 The Moab City Council held its regular meeting on the above date in the Council Chambers at the Moab City Center, located at 217 East Center Street. Pre-Council Budget Workshop: At 12:07 PM, Mayor Emily Niehaus called a workshop meeting to order. In attendance were Councilmembers Karen Guzman-Newton, Rani Derasary and Mike Duncan. Also in attendance were City Manager David Everitt, Assistant City Manager Joel Linares, Sustainability Director Rosemarie Russo, Recorder Sommar Johnson, Finance Director Rachel Stenta, Engineer Chuck Williams, Parks Superintendent Mike Huts, Public Works Administrative Assistant Marcy Mason, Sewer Superintendent Obe Tejada, Water Superintendent Levi Jones, Wastewater Reclamation Facility Superintendent Greg Fosse, Streets Superintendent Jeff Galley, Moab Arts and Recreation Director Liz Holland, Police Chief Jim Winder, Assistant Chief Bret Edge and Records Specialist Eve Tallman. A video recording of the workshop is archived at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGGx6fL7PGY. An audio recording is archived at: https://www.utah.gov/pmn/index.html. The meeting began with a workshop for the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Budget. Huts described various roles of the Parks team and outlined budget items. Staff answered questions, including an update on grant funding from Russo. Tejada and Fosse followed with information and answers regarding the sewer and wastewater reclamation budgets. Winder presented the Police Department budget overview. Council asked about staff turnover, shared dispatch costs and contingency planning. Motion to Recess and Vote: Councilmember Derasary moved to recess the meeting until 5:00 PM. Councilmember Guzman-Newton seconded the motion. The motion passed 3-0. Mayor Niehaus recessed the meeting at 1:37 PM. Pre-Council Workshop: Mayor Niehaus reconvened the workshop at 5:06 PM. In attendance were Councilmembers Guzman-Newton, Kalen Jones, Duncan and Derasary. Councilmember Tawny Knuteson-Boyd arrived at 5:34 PM. Planning Commission members in attendance included Becky Byrd, Kya Marienfield, Allison Brown and Marianne Becnel. Brian Ballard arrived at 5:30 PM. Staff in attendance included City Manager Everitt, Recorder Johnson, City Engineer Williams, Sustainability Director Russo, City Planner Nora Shepard, Records Specialist Tallman, City Attorney Chris McAnany and Assistant City Manager Linares. Eleven members of the public and media were present. A video recording of the workshop is archived at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0YIe7DlWZRI. An audio recording is archived at: https://www.utah.gov/pmn/index.html. The workshop began with an introduction of the City’s new Planner, Nora Shepard. The focus of the workshop was a joint City Council and City Planning Commission briefing with Landmark Design consultant Jenny Hale regarding the Future Land Use Planning Process and Overnight Accommodations Moratorium. Hale presented progress on Landmark’s study of community sentiment regarding future land use. Options were presented. Among topics discussed were resistance to mechanisms that resemble conditional uses, impact fees, use by rights, fairness to existing landowners, pros and cons of allowing nightly rentals during peak season, grandfathered uses, impacts of San Juan County development and next steps. Regular Meeting—Call to Order and Attendance: Mayor Niehaus called the regular meeting to order at 7:03 PM and led the Pledge of Allegiance. In addition to the above staff, Senior Project Manager Tracy Dutson, Human Resource Director Danielle Guerrero, Communications and Outreach Director Lisa Church and several Law Enforcement Officers Page 2 of 4 -- April 23, 2019 were in attendance. Fifty members of the public and media were present. A video recording is archived at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFRubg7SNyA. An audio recording is archived at: http://www.utah.gov/pmn/index.html. Approval of Minutes: Councilmember Guzman-Newton moved to approve minutes of the April 9, 2019 meeting with two corrections. Councilmember Derasary seconded the motion. Councilmember Jones amended the minutes to include the bills paid in the amount of $703,915.36. Councilmember Duncan clarified for the minutes his departure due to illness at the close of Old Business. The motion passed 5-0 aye with Councilmembers Jones, Derasary, Knuteson-Boyd, Guzman-Newton and Duncan voting aye. Mayor and Council Reports: Mayor Niehaus announced she had met with the Planning Commission candidate and recommended him. She reported she met with Arches National Park Superintendent Kate Cannon to discuss issues regarding the proposed reservation system. The Mayor also mentioned she had authored a white paper for the Governor’s Rural Partnership Board on the impacts of the Mighty 5 advertising campaign. She also mentioned a webinar she attended with Russo on low-to-no emission buses. She brought up the KZMU Radiothon and cited a news piece regarding affordable housing. She concluded with recognition of April as Sexual Assault Awareness month. Councilmember Derasary thanked Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd for her announcement of a recent event at the Museum. She also noted her attendance at the Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) steering committee meeting, where potential future rail service and the UMTRA site’s impact on dark skies were discussed. Councilmember Duncan mentioned that the new well installed by San Juan County may benefit from leakage from Kens Lake. Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd reported she met with a Romanian trade delegation. Councilmember Guzman-Newton reported on her meeting with the airport board where it was noted that $1,800 in parking revenues were collected in one month. She stated Airport Manager Judd Hill was negotiating with SkyWest regarding changes to air service. She concluded with a mention of a Grand County Council meeting she attended regarding the Utah Department of Transportation shuttle study. She noted the County wants to host a joint meeting on May 7. Councilmember Jones reported on a meeting of the Solid Waste District where it was discussed that the Resiliency Hub is hosting gatherings, the Solid Waste District is interested in conducting a community cleanup, and a new baler is needed for operations. Administrative Report: City Manager Everitt reported he is enacting a transition plan for Assistant City Manager Linares. He mentioned meetings he attended in Salt Lake City with Landmark, GSBS consultants regarding the Powerhouse neighborhood Small Area Plan, as well as the City’s water attorney. He also mentioned the new planner, Nora Shepard started work. Public Hearing: Community Development Block Grant: Mayor Niehaus opened the second public hearing for the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) Accessibility Improvements to Downtown Recreation Facilities Project at 7:25 PM. She stated that this hearing was called to allow all citizens to provide input concerning the project that was awarded under the 2019 Community Development Block Grant Program. The city has amended its capital investment plan and decided to apply for funds on behalf of the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) Accessibility Improvements to Downtown Recreation Facilities Project. The Mayor explained that the application was successful in the regional rating and ranking Page 3 of 4 -- April 23, 2019 process and was awarded $74,000 and explained the project to those in attendance. The Mayor then asked for any comments from the audience. There were no comments. Councilmember Guzman-Newton moved to close the public hearing. Councilmember Jones seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0 aye with Councilmembers Jones, Derasary, Knuteson-Boyd, Guzman- Newton and Duncan voting aye. Mayor Niehaus closed the public hearing at 7:28 PM. Presentations: Police Chief Ceremony: Police Chief Winder made a statement about his gratitude to the City for his opportunity to serve and he praised the incoming Chief, Bret Edge. Mr. Edge acknowledged his appreciation for Chief Winder’s mentorship and thanked the Council for his opportunity to serve as Chief of Police. Mayor Niehaus explained the transition would occur in early May. Both were honored with hearty applause. Arbor Day Proclamation: Mayor Niehaus read a proclamation and announced a tree planting ceremony to take place at the Moab Arts and Recreation Center. Students of the Month: Mayor Niehaus presented the April Student of the Month Awards for Grand County Middle School Seventh-grader Chloe Skowbo and Eighth-grader Natalie Skowbo. Citizens to be Heard: There were no citizens to be heard. Old Business: Walnut Lane Architectural Services—Discussion Senior Project Manager Dutson reviewed feedback from the Council on the Draft Request for Proposals (RFP) for Architectural and Engineering Services for the Walnut Lane Trailer Park. He answered further questions about minimum square footage, prospective bidders, provisions for pets and next steps. Parking Management Study—Postponed Discussion: This agenda item was rescheduled for a future meeting. Planned Affordable Development (PAD)—Discussion: Proposed Ordinance 2019-02 - Amending the City of Moab Municipal Code by Adding a New Chapter 17.68 Planned Affordable Development (PAD) was discussed. City Attorney McAnany introduced edits and noted more comments were incoming. Topics discussed included omitting the R2 and MH-1 zone, ratios of affordable units versus market rate units, eligibility for occupancy, sublets, inflation and appreciation caps, including the C3 zone, sunset clause, solar access, parking, staffing implications for enforcement and preliminary plat authority. New Business: Planning Commission Nomination—Confirmed Motion and Vote: Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd moved to approve the Mayoral Appointment of Cory Shurtleff to the City Planning and Zoning Commission. Councilmember Derasary seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0 aye with Councilmembers Jones, Derasary, Knuteson-Boyd, Guzman-Newton and Duncan voting aye. Water Connection Procedures—Approved Motion and Vote: Councilmember Derasary moved to approve Ordinance 2019-14 - Modifying Wastewater Connection and Culinary Water Connection Procedures. Councilmember Jones seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0 aye with Councilmembers Jones, Derasary, Knuteson-Boyd, Guzman-Newton and Duncan voting aye. Page 4 of 4 -- April 23, 2019 Temporary Water Connection Fees—Approved Motion and Vote: Councilmember Derasary moved to approve Resolution 26-2019 - Setting Temporary Water and Wastewater Connection Fees Pending Completion of a Master Fee Ordinance. Councilmember Jones seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0 aye with Councilmembers Jones, Derasary, Knuteson-Boyd, Guzman-Newton and Duncan voting aye. Interlocal Agreement with San Juan Spanish Valley—Approved Motion and Vote: Councilmember Duncan moved to approve Resolution 28-2019 - Approving an Interlocal Cooperation Agreement with the San Juan Spanish Valley Special Services District and the City of Moab. Councilmember Jones seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0 aye with Councilmembers Jones, Derasary, Knuteson-Boyd, Guzman-Newton and Duncan voting aye. Settlement Agreement—Approved Motion and Vote: Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd moved to approve Resolution 30-2019 - Authorizing the Mayor to Sign a Settlement Agreement Resolving All Claims by the Former City Manager. Councilmember Jones seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0 aye with Councilmembers Jones, Derasary, Knuteson-Boyd, Guzman-Newton and Duncan voting aye. Adoption of Tentative Budget—Approved Motion and Vote: Councilmember Guzman-Newton moved to approve Resolution 23-2019 - Adopting the FY2019-2020 Tentative Budget and setting a public hearing date for May 14, 2019. Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0 aye with Councilmembers Jones, Derasary, Knuteson-Boyd, Guzman-Newton and Duncan voting aye. Bills Against the City of Moab—Approved Motion and Vote: Councilmember Jones moved to approve bills for $985,509.14. Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0 aye with Councilmembers Jones, Derasary, Knuteson-Boyd, Guzman-Newton and Duncan voting aye. Executive Session: Councilmember Derasary moved to enter an Executive Closed Session to Discuss the Character, Professional Competence, or Physical or Mental Health of an Individual or Individuals. Councilmember Jones seconded the motion. The motion carried 5-0 aye, with Councilmembers Derasary, Jones, Duncan, Knuteson-Boyd and Guzman-Newton voting aye. Mayor Niehaus convened the Executive Closed Session at 9:45 PM. Councilmember Knuteson- Boyd moved to end the Executive Closed Session. Councilmember Jones seconded the motion. The motion carried 5-0 aye, with Councilmembers Derasary, Duncan, Jones, Knuteson-Boyd and Guzman-Newton voting aye. Mayor Niehaus ended the Executive Session at 10:00 PM. Adjournment: Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd moved to adjourn the meeting. Councilmember Derasary seconded the motion. The motion carried 5-0 aye, with Councilmembers Derasary, Jones, Duncan, Knuteson-Boyd and Guzman-Newton voting aye. Mayor Niehaus adjourned the meeting at 10:00 PM. APPROVED: __________________ ATTEST: ___________________ Emily S. Niehaus, Mayor Sommar Johnson, City Recorder Page 1 of 1 April 29, 2019 MOAB CITY SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES APRIL 29, 2019--DRAFT Call to Order and Attendance: The Moab City Council held a Special Council Meeting on the above date in the City Council Chambers located at 217 East Center Street. The purpose of the meeting was for a budget workshop for the proposed Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Annual Budget. An audio recording is archived at http://www.utah.gov/pmn/index.html and a video recording is archived at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hENyXk-pit8. Mayor Emily Niehaus called the meeting to order at 12:04 PM. In attendance were Councilmembers Tawny Knuteson-Boyd, MikeDuncan, Kalen Jones and Karen Guzman-Newton. Councilmember Rani Derasary did not attend. Also in attendance were City Finance Director Rachel Stenta, Recorder Sommar Johnson, Assistant City Manager Joel Linares and 18 other staff members. One member of the press attended. The workshop covered recreation including sports, arts and aquatics, and touched on finance and stormwater matters. Councilmembers requested more information about the public safety budget, special projects and next steps including the public hearing. Adjournment: Councilmember Guzman-Newton moved to adjourn the meeting. Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Mayor Niehaus adjourned the meeting at 2:08 PM. APPROVED: __________________ ATTEST: ___________________ Emily S. Niehaus, Mayor Sommar Johnson, City Recorder Page 1 of 1 May 6, 2019 MOAB CITY SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES MAY 6, 2019--DRAFT Executive Closed Session: Mayor Emily Niehaus called a Special Council Meeting to order on the above date in the City Council Chambers located at 217 East Center Street at 11:35 AM. In attendance were Councilmembers Tawny Knuteson-Boyd, Mike Duncan, Kalen Jones and Karen Guzman-Newton. Councilmember Rani Derasary did not attend. Councilmember Jones moved to enter an Executive Closed Session to Discuss the Character, Professional Competence, or Physical or Mental Health of an Individual or Individuals. Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Mayor Niehaus convened the Executive Closed Session at 11:35 AM. Councilmember Jones moved to end the Executive Closed Session. Councilmember Guzman-Newton seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously. Mayor Niehaus ended the Executive Session at 12:05 PM. Workshop Meeting Call to Order and Attendance: The Moab City Council then held a Special Workshop Meeting. The purpose of the meeting was for a budget workshop for the proposed Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Annual Budget. An audio recording is archived at http://www.utah.gov/pmn/index.html and a video recording is archived at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lQvKbkxhpZo. Mayor Niehaus called the meeting to order at 12:12 PM. In attendance were Councilmembers Duncan, Jones and Guzman- Newton. Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd viewed the meeting remotely and Councilmember Derasary did not attend. Also in attendance were City Manager David Everitt, City Finance Director Rachel Stenta, Recorder Sommar Johnson, Assistant City Manager Joel Linares, Records Specialist Eve Tallman, Planner Nora Shepard, Human Resource Director Danielle Guerrero, Police Chief Bret Edge, Engineer Chuck Williams, Sustainability Director Rosemarie Russo, Communication and Outreach Director Lisa Church and Executive Administrative Assistant Carmella Galley. The workshop began with Finance Director Stenta demonstrating an interactive budget simulation tool available to the public. Next the Council considered the public safety budget. Chief Edge explained the budget was very similar to the prior year with added expenses for animal control, training and travel. City Manager Everitt explained the administration budget. Discussion ensued regarding salary adjustments to account for health care benefits for elected officials. A salary survey and the topic of employee compensation were also brought up. Everitt mentioned administrative positions, the film commission, community contributions, human resource management, Recorder and Planning department staffing. The workshop concluded with discussion of capital projects. Of note were projects involving Kane Creek Road and Highway 191 as well as green infrastructure. Adjournment: Councilmember Guzman-Newton moved to adjourn the meeting. Councilmember Duncan seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Mayor Niehaus adjourned the meeting at 2:02 PM. APPROVED: __________________ ATTEST: ___________________ Emily S. Niehaus, Mayor Sommar Johnson, City Recorder Page 1 of 2 May 7, 2019 MOAB CITY COUNCIL MINUTES--DRAFT SPECIAL JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND GRAND COUNTY COUNCIL WORKSHOP MEETING MAY 7, 2019 Call to Order and Attendance: The Moab City Council attended a Special Joint City Council and Grand County Council Workshop Meeting on the above date in the Grand County Council Chambers at 125 East Center Street, Moab, Utah. An audio recording of the meeting is archived at http://www.utah.gov/pmn/index.html. In attendance were Mayor Emily Niehaus and City Councilmembers Kalen Jones, Karen Guzman-Newton, Tawny Knuteson-Boyd and Mike Duncan. Councilmember Rani Derasary was not in attendance. Also present were City Manager David Everitt, Assistant City Manager Joel Linares, Sustainability Director Rosemarie Russo, City Planner Nora Shepard and Records Specialist Eve Tallman. Representing Grand County were Councilmembers Mary McGann, Terry Morse, Jaylyn Hawks, Evan Clapper, Curtis Wells, Rory Paxman and Greg Halliday, as well as County Council Administrator Ruth Dillon, County Community and Economic Development Director Zacharia Levine and County Clerk Chris Baird. Twenty-three members of the media and public attended. Chairperson Clapper opened the meeting at 2:03 PM. Discussion Regarding Arches National Park congestion and future studies to address a short-term plan: Councilperson Wells presented an overview of congestion concerns. A representative from the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) explained there were transit funds available to pursue further study of congestion and Recreation Hot Spot funding need not be used. Timed Entry (reservations), shuttles and added entry points for the park were discussed. Wells stated congestion is not good for business and even if a shuttle were determined to be feasible, it could not be developed within two years. Councilmember McGann spoke in favor of timed entry and noted there had not been a survey of tourists who have declined a visit to Moab due to congestion. Councilmember Knuteson-Boyd also spoke in favor of timed entry. Park Superintendent Kate Cannon stated that commercial vehicles such as buses and private shuttles would be exempt from the reservation system. She also noted the proposed timeframe for reservations had been reduced from eight months to six, and proposed hours requiring reservations had been reduced to 7:00 AM to 3:00 PM. She added that a shuttle system would take years to develop and was costly. Councilmember Duncan supported a reservation system. Councilmember Halliday stated there were too many people in too small of an area and condoned spreading people to other parks. Councilmember Morse said he sees the reservation system as more fruitful for dining and shopping and adds to the quality of the visitor experience. Additionally developed entry points in Salt Valley and Willow Springs were discussed. Councilmember Jones expressed his interest in taking imminent action on support letters or resolutions. Dillon stated that Elaine Gizler, head of the Moab Area Travel Council, needs 18 months’ notice to implement any change. Councilmember Paxman stated he was already taking 2020 reservations at his business to transport visitors to the Park, and it was pointed out his business would be exempt from the reservation system. Transit committee member Michael Liss stated there was not enough information regarding the viability of a shuttle. The manager of City Market, speaking as the President of the Chamber of Commerce, stated that killing any growth in Moab could kill family livelihoods. Chairperson Clapper stated that congestion is an area-wide problem and Councilmember Guzman-Newton called for discussion between all land management agencies. Update on the ongoing Land Use Code amendment process to address the City and County moratoria prohibiting new land use applications or permits for overnight accommodations: Levine provided an overview of progress on the moratoria. He Page 2 of 2 May 7, 2019 explained that one issue to be resolved was about other new development not related to nightly accommodations. He added standards must be developed if overlay zones were established, and defining the boundaries of the zones is a first step. Councilmember Guzman-Newton commented that the proposed boundaries need adjustment. Mayor Niehaus brought up related community nodes that would define zones for neighborhood-scale mixed uses. Levine asked for clarification from the councils regarding removing new lodging as a use by right across the board. He added the consultants need clarification on the northern corridor. Redevelopment rules were brought up and the consultants agreed to prepare a map showing all vested properties. Councilmember Jones requested a task list for each council and asked about mixed- use zones. Landmark consultant Mark Vlasik, who participated remotely, clarified the next steps as removing use by right, considering alternatives for Thompson Springs and Cisco, developing standards for eligible overlays in the north corridor and downtown while examining the boundaries for those zones, and developing exemption language for existing short term rental developments such as Rim Village and Entrada. Mayor Niehaus moved to adjourn. Councilmember Jones seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously and Chairperson Clapper adjourned the meeting at 4:18 PM. APPROVED: __________________ ATTEST: ___________________ Emily S. Niehaus, Mayor Sommar Johnson, City Recorder Moab City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: May 14, 2019 Title: Public Hearing to Consider Vacating a Portion of Emma Boulevard and Amend the UTEX Subdivision, Plat B, Lot 14, Section 36, T25S, R21E, SLBM Disposition: Discussion. Staff Presenter: Chuck Williams, City Engineer. Attachment(s): –Attachment 1 - Copy of Posted Public Notice –Attachment 2 - Copy of Amended Plat Recommended Motion: N/A Background/Summary: The City of Moab needs to hold a public hearing to consider vacating a portion of Emma Boulevard and amend the UTEX Subdivision, Plat B, Lot 14, Section 36, T25S, R21E, SLBM. As part of the proposed action the owner of Lot 14 will dedicate to the City 11,628 square feet of Lot 14 which will be used for a future shared use path connecting the east side of HWY-191 with the shared use path on the west side of HWY-191 that currently ends on Emma Boulevard. Per the proposed Plat Map (attached) the parcel will be known as Minnie Lee Avenue, a public street, which may be used as a future roadway connecting to HWY-191. The other part of the proposed action is for the City of Moab to grant a private easement to Lots 14, 15 16 &17 for purposes of pedestrian and vehicle ingress/egress, parking, utilities, and the construction/maintenance of a parking lot. The UDOT is including the extension of the shared use path on the east side of HWY-191 and a HAWK (pedestrian activated signal crossing) as part of the HWY-191 widening project which is scheduled to begin construction in late fall of 2019.If the proposed action is approved then the shared use path will utilize the Minnie Lee Avenue right-of-way for access to Hwy-191. CITY OF MOAB Public Hearing Notice Action Requested: NOTICE OF A PETITION TO VACATE, ALTER, OR AMEND A SUBDIVISION PLAT OR PUBLIC STREET Property Location/Description: A portion of Emma Boulevard and amend the Utex Subdivision, Plat B, Lot 14, Section 36, T25S, R21E, SLBM Date/Time/Location of Public Hearing: Tuesday, May 14 , 20 19 at approximately 7:15 pm in the City Council Chambers at 217 East Center Street For more information contact : Moab Engineering Department 217 East Center Street Moab, Utah 435-259-4941 1 5 . 5 1 'S 25°51'05" E 243.39'100.00'100.00'100.00'100.00'N 4 7 ° 5 8 ' 5 8 " E 1 3 9 . 1 1 'S 55 °15 '01 " W 153 .77 'N 59 °19 '51 " E 180 .69 '35.40'35.40'85.45'N 88°36'45" E 257.76'39.77'76.06'271.52'244.97'39.77'76.06'143.02'52.61'LOT 3LOT 14LOT 15LOT 16LOT 4LOT 5BLOCK "E"BLOCK "F"BLOCK "G"ROSALIE COURTMIVIDA DRIVE(BASIS OF BEARING)S 18°12' E (R) S 19°38'45" E (M) 503.65'30.00' 30.00'30.00 ' 30.00' 30.00'30.00 'N 25°51'05" W 239.96'S 88°29'45" W 41.50'N 1°30'15" W 60.00'N 88°29'45" E 41.50'R=110.00'L=51.16'Δ=26°38'53"R=2242.01'L=140.54'Δ=3°35'29"S 62 °04 '24 " W 202 .48 'S 25°51'05" E 311.16'N 1°23'15" W 60.00'S 88°36'45" W 50.05'S 64°08 '55 " W 60 .00 'R=25.00'L=28.60'Δ=65°32'10"R=25.00'L=49.94'Δ=114°27'50"N 1°23'15" W (R)S 64°08'55" W (R)R=50.00'L=57.29'Δ=65°39'10"EAST 585.30'SOUTH 116.17' S 4 4 ° 3 6 ' 1 2 " W ( R ) 30.00'30.00'30.00 '30.00 '75.90'39.86'N 88°29'45" E 206.88'50.10'170.84'75.90'30.00'30.00' 30.00'30.00'N 4 6 ° 1 5 ' 0 7 " E 1 2 8 . 0 9 'S 79°13'39" E 93.62'LOT 17MINNIE LEE AVENUEMAXINE AVENUE2 7 . 5 6 ' 8 5 . 0 2 '30.00'30.00'HIGHWAY 191(PUBLIC STREET)(60 FT WIDE PUBLIC STREET)(60 FT WIDE PUBLIC STREET)(50 FT WIDE PUBLIC STREET)PRIVATE INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT FORLOTS 14, 15, 16 & 17. CONTAINING 11,603 SQ FTCITY OF MOABAR E A TO B E D EC IC A T E D TO TH E C I T Y O F MO A BCON T A I N S 1 1 , 6 2 8 SQ F T C1C2C3L1L 2C4C5L3C6 C7L4L5 L6MINN I E L E E A V ENU E ( P U B L I C S T R E E T )LINE TABLELINE NUMBERL1L2L3L4L5L6DIRECTIONN 79°03'48" EN 46°15'07" EN 33°43'23" EN 25°51'05" WN 33°43'23" EN 25°51'05" WLENGTH18.16'27.56'3.74'42.93'28.07'240.17'CURVE TABLECURVE NUMBERC1C2C3C4C5C6C7LENGTH58.22'39.84'42.47'67.83'27.19'33.27'86.10'RADIUS2242.01'2242.01'2242.01'195.00'48.00'32.00'85.00'DELTA1°29'16"1°01'06"1°05'07"19°55'47"32°27'31"59°34'29"58°02'03"TANGENT29.11'19.92'21.24'34.26'13.97'18.32'47.15'N 46°15'07" E 128.09'(SCALE ONLY VALID FOR 24" x 36" PAPER)02550100SCALE: 1" = 50'LEGENDALL BOUNDARY AND PROPERTY (LOT) CORNERS TO BE SET WITH 5/8" REBAR AND CAP STAMPED CIVILSCIENCE SURVEYORS, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED ON THE PLAT.BOUNDARY DESCRIPTIONSURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATEDATETRAVIS W. SANDERS, PLSOWNER'S DEDICATIONLIMITED LIABILITY ACKNOWLEDGMENTI, TRAVIS SANDERS, A PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR, LICENSE NUMBER 9481170, HOLD THIS LICENSE IN ACCORDANCE WITHTITLE 58 CHAPTER 22, PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS AND PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS LICENSING ACT AND HAVECOMPLETED THIS SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREON IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 17-23-17 AND HAVEVERIFIED ALL MEASUREMENTS AND HAVE PLACED MONUMENTS AS REPRESENTED ON THIS PLAT. I CERTIFY THAT BYAUTHORITY OF THE HEREON OWNERS I HAVE MADE A SURVEY OF THE TRACT OF LAND AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT AND HAVEAMENDED LOT 14, PUBLIC STREET AND EASEMENTS TO BE HEREINAFTER KNOWN AS:AND THAT THE SAME HAS BEEN CORRECTLY SURVEYED AND STAKED ON THE GROUND AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT.APPROVAL AND ACCEPTANCE BY CITY OF MOAB, UTAHRECORDED No.GRAND COUNTY RECORDERMAYOR, CITY OF MOABATTEST: CITY RECORDER, CITY OF MOABENGINEER'S APPROVALENGINEER, CITY OF MOABAPPROVAL AS TO FORMCITY ATTORNEY, CITY OF MOABTHE HEREON SUBDIVISION FINAL PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND ISAPPROVED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE INFORMATION ON FILE IN THISOFFICE THIS _____ DAY OF ____________, A.D. 20____WE, THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MOAB, UT, HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVESUBDIVISION FINAL PLAT AND BY AUTHORIZATION OF SAID CITY COUNCIL, RECORD IN THEMINUTES OF ITS MEETING OF THE ____ DAY OF ____________ A.D. 20____ HEREBY ACCEPT SAIDFINAL PLAT WITH ALL COMMITMENTS AND OBLIGATIONS PERTAINING THERETO.APPROVED AS TO FORM, THIS THE ____ DAY OF ____________, A.D.20____.DRAWN BY: PJWHOR SCALE: 1" = 50'SCALE OF SHEET CHECKED BY: TWSPROJ. #: FF18197.00SHEETAMENDED LOT 14, BLOCK "E", PLAT "B" UTEX SUBDIVISION SW 1/4 OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 25 SOUTH, RANGE 21 EAST, SALT LAKE BASE & MERIDIAN11OFLOCATED IN ROYEVRUSDNALANSEFORP STATEOFUTAHTRAVIS W.SANDERSNo.9481170LOI SS.S.STATE OF __________________________COUNTY OF ________________________}1453 S DIXIE DR, SUITE 150 ST. GEORGE, UT 84770 435.986.0100 INFRASTRUCTURE, INC.KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT THE UNDERSIGNED OWNERS OF THE HEREON DESCRIBED TRACT OF LAND HAVINGCAUSED SAME TO BE AMENDING LOT 14, PUBLIC STREET, AND EASEMENTS TO HEREAFTER BE KNOWN AS:FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION RECEIVED, OWNER HEREBY DEDICATES AND CONVEYS IN FEE SIMPLE TO THE CITYOF MOAB THE PARCELS OF LAND SHOWN ON THIS PLAT AS MINNIE LEE AVENUE. LOT 14, PUBLIC STREETS AND EASEMENTSARE AS NOTED OR SHOWN. THE OWNER DOES HEREBY WARRANT TO CITY OF MOAB AND ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS,TITLE TO ALL PROPERTY DEDICATED AND CONVEYED TO PUBLIC USE HEREIN AGAINST THE CLAIMS OF ALL PERSONS. LOT 14SHOWN ON THIS PLAT IS SUBJECT TO THE DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS,, RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE GRAND COUNTY RECORDER ON THE , AS SAIDDECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS IS HEREBY INCORPORATED AND MADE A PART OF THIS PLAT.(A UTAH LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY)PROSPECTOR VILLAGE, LLC ON THE ___ DAY OF ________________ 20__, PERSONALLY APPEARED BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID STATE ANDCOUNTY, ______________________________WHO BEING BY ME DULY SWORN, DID SAY THAT HE IS THE MANAGER/MEMBER OF PROSPECTOR VILLAGE,LLC, AND THAT HE EXECUTED THE FOREGOING OWNER'S DEDICATION IN BEHALF OF SAID LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY BEING AUTHORIZED ANDEMPOWERED TO DO SO BY THE OPERATING AGREEMENT OF ___________________, LLC, AND HE DID DULY ACKNOWLEDGE TO ME THAT SUCH LIMITEDLIABILITY COMPANY EXECUTED THE SAME FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES STATED THEREIN.AMENDED LOT 14, BLOCK "E", PLAT "B" UTEX SUBDIVISION AMENDED LOT 14, BLOCK "E", PLAT "B" UTEX SUBDIVISION SALT LAKE BASE AND MERIDIANSW 1/4 OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 25 SOUTH, RANGE 21 EAST,LOCATED IN GRAND COUNTY - MOAB, UTAH(MANAGER MEMBER)PROJECTSITEVICINITY MAP(N.T.S.)DATE: 5-7-2019BEGINNING AT THE EASTERN MOST CORNER OF LOT 14, BLOCK “E”, PLAT “B” UTEX SUBDIVISION, RECORDED AND ON FILE ATTHE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER, GRAND COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH, POINT ALSO BEING EAST 585.30 FEET AND SOUTH 116.17FEET FROM A MONUMENT IN THE INTERSECTION OF MCGILL BLVD AND MIVIDA DRIVE, POINT ALSO BEING NORTH 995.66 FEETAND WEST 246.41 FEET FROM THE SOUTH 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 25 SOUTH, RANGE 21 EAST, SALT LAKE BASEAND MERIDIAN, AND RUNNING THENCE S 55°15'01” W 153.77 FEET ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 15, TO THEWESTERN MOST CORNER OF SAID LOT 15; THENCE S 25°51'05” E 311.16 FEET ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 15 ANDLOTS 16, 17 AND A PORTION OF LOT 18; THENCE S 64°08'55” W 60.00 FEET, TO A POINT ON A 25.00 FOOT RADIUS NON-TANGENTCURVE TO THE LEFT, WITH A RADIUS WHICH BEARS S 64°08'55” W, POINT ALSO BEING ON BLOCK “G” OF SAIDSUBDIVISION; THENCE ALONG BLOCK “G” THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES, (1) THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAIDCURVE 28.60 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 65°32'10”, (2) THENCE S 88°36'45” W 50.05 FEET; THENCEN 1°23'15” W 60.00 FEET, TO A POINT ON A 25.00 FOOT RADIUS NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS WHICH BEARSN 1°23'15” W, POINT ALSO BEING ON THE SOUTH LINE OF BLOCK “F” OF SAID SUBDIVISION; THENCE ALONG SAID BLOCK “F” THEFOLLOWING FOUR (4) COURSES, (1) THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 49.94 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLEOF 114°27'50”, (2) THENCE N 25°51'05” W 239.96 FEET, TO THE POINT OF A 50.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE LEFT, (3) THENCEALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 57.29 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 65°39'10”, (4) THENCES 88°29'45” W 41.50 FEET; THENCE N 1°30'15” W 60.00 FEET, TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 3 OF SAIDSUBDIVISION; THENCE ALONG SAID LOT THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES, (1) THENCE N 88°29'45” E 41.50 FEET, TO THEPOINT OF A 110.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO THE RIGHT, (2) THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 51.16 FEET THROUGH ACENTRAL ANGLE OF 26°38'53”; (3) THENCE N 47°58'58” E 139.11 FEET, TO A POINT ON A 2242.01 FOOT RADIUS NON-TANGENTCURVE TO THE RIGHT, WITH A RADIUS WHICH BEARS S 44°36'12” W; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 140.54 FEETTHROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3°35'29”, TO THE NORTHERN MOST CORNER OF LOT 15 OF SAID SUBDIVISION;, TO THE POINTOF BEGINNING.CONTAINING 51,456 SQ FT OR 1.18 ACRES MORE OR LESSEASEMENT LINE (SEE NOTES)SPECIFIES SURVEY CONTROL MONUMENT TO BE SET (CLASS II, REBAR & ALUM. CAP SET TO CITY STANDARD).SPECIFIES FOUND SURVEY CONTROL MONUMENT AS SHOWN AND NOTED (REBAR).NOTARY PUBLICNOTARY PUBLIC FULL NAME:A NOTARY PUBLIC COMMISSIONED IN UTAHSTAMP IS NOT REQUIRED PER UTAH CODE 46-1-16(6)COMMISSION NUMBER:MY COMMISSION EXPIRES:S 88°35'14" W 1814.89'McGILL BLVD500 WEST STREET AMENDED LOT 14, BLOCK "E",PLAT "B" UTEX SUBDIVISIONP.O.B., EASTERN MOST CORNEROF LOT 14, BLOCK "E", PLAT "B"UTEX SUBDIVISION, ENTRY NO.279409AMENDMENT NOTETHE PURPOSE OF THIS AMENDMENT IS TO CREATE A ROADWAY ACROSS A PORTION OF LOT 14 BLOCK "E" PLAT "A" UTEXSUBDIVISION, AND TO CREATE A PRIVATE EASEMENT, AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. THIS AMENDED PLAT AMENDS ANDSUPERCEDES ALL PLATS EXECUTED OR RECORDER PRIOR TO THE DATE SPECIFIED BELOW AND ENCOMPASSING ORAFFECTING THE LANDS THAT ARE DESCRIBED HEREIN. PROSPECTOR VILLAGE, LLC SHALL BE ALLOWED PRIVATE DRIVEWAYACCESS TO MINNIE LEE AVENUE CONNECTING TO MAIN STREET FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF LOT 14, SUBJECT TO ALL CITYOF MOAB DESIGN AND SAFETY REQUIREMENTS AS MAY BE REQUIRED IN ANY SUBSEQUENT LAND USE REVIEW PROCESS.MAYOR: EMILY NIEHAUSCITY OF MOABA UTAH MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONCORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGMENT ON THE ___ DAY OF ________________ 20__, PERSONALLY APPEARED BEFORE ME EMILY NIEHAUS WHO BEING BY ME DULY SWORN DID SAY THATHE IS THE MAYOR OF CITY OF MOAB, A UTAH MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, AND THAT HE EXECUTED THE FOREGOING OWNER'S DEDICATION ON BEHALFOF SAID MUNICIPAL CORPORATION BY AUTHORITY OF A RESOLUTION OF ITS CITY COUNCIL AND HE DID ACKNOWLEDGE TO ME THAT THECORPORATION EXECUTED THE SAME FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES STATED THEREIN.S.S.STATE OF ________________________COUNTY OF ______________________NOTARY PUBLICNOTARY PUBLIC FULL NAME:COMMISSION NUMBER:MY COMMISSION EXPIRES:A NOTARY PUBLIC COMMISSIONED IN UTAHSTAMP IS NOT REQUIRED PER UTAH CODE 46-1-16(6)SECTIONAL MONUMENTATION (FOUND: TYPE, DATE, AGENCY AND LOCATION ETC. AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT).SOUTH 1/4 CORNER, SECTION 36,TOWNSHIP 25 SOUTH, RANGE 21 EAST,SALT LAKE BASE AND MERIDIANFND REBARAREA TO BE DEDICATED WITH THIS PLATPORTION OF ROADWAY PREVIOUSLYDEDICATED WITH PLAT "B" UTEXSUBDIVISION, ENTRY NO. 279409PORTION OF ROADWAY PREVIOUSLYDEDICATED WITH PLAT "B" UTEXSUBDIVISION, ENTRY NO. 279409PRIVATE EASEMENT SEE NOTE NO. 1(TIE LINE)WEST 246.41'NORTH 995.66'PRIVATE INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT FOR LOTS 14, 15, 16 & 17, TO BE DEDICATED WITH THIS PLATMORTGAGEE ACKNOWLEDGMENTMORTGAGEE'S CONSENT TO RECORDTHE UNDERSIGNED, ____________________________________, A MORTGAGEE FOR THE CONTINENTAL BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, DOES HEREBY GIVECONSENT TO THE RECORDATION OF THE HEREON ENTITLED PROJECT FOR SAID TRACT OF LAND TO BE USED FOR THE USES AND PURPOSESDESCRIBED IN THE PLAT, TO RECORDING PLAT, RECORDING OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AND JOINS IN ALL DEDICATIONS ANDCONVEYANCES. ON THE ___ DAY OF ________________ 20__, PERSONALLY APPEARED BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID STATE ANDCOUNTY, , WHO BEING BY ME DULY SWORN, DID ACKNOWLEDGE TO ME THAT SIGNED THE CONSENT OF MORTGAGEE TORECORD FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES STATED THEREIN.S.S.STATE OF _______________COUNTY OF ______________NOTARY PUBLICNOTARY PUBLIC FULL NAME:COMMISSION NUMBER:MY COMMISSION EXPIRES:A NOTARY PUBLIC COMMISSIONED IN UTAHSTAMP IS NOT REQUIRED PER UTAH CODE 46-1-16(6)EMMA BLVD(60 FT WIDE PUBLIC STREET)GENERAL NOTE1. THE EASEMENT IS DEDICATED AND CONVEYED BY THE CITY OF MOAB TO BE APPURTENANT TO THE OWNERS OF LOTS 14, 15,16, AND 17 (THE BENEFITTED PARCELS) OF THE UTEX SUBDIVISION, BLOCK E, PLAT B. THE BENEFITTED PARCELS MAY USE THEEASEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICLE INGRESS/EGRESS, PARKING, UTILITIES, AND THECONSTRUCTION/MAINTENANCE OF A PARKING LOT. THIS EASEMENT DOES NOT CONFER THE RIGHT TO CONSTRUCTPERMANENT STRUCTURES OTHER THAN THOSE SPECIFIED ABOVE. ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES MUST BE APPROVEDTHROUGH LAND USE REVIEW PROCESSES BY THE CITY OF MOAB.2. THE PURPOSE OF THE EMMA BOULEVARD EASEMENT SHALL INCLUDE THE CONTINUED USE, MAINTENANCE, IMPROVEMENT,AND/OR POSSIBLE FUTURE REALIGNMENT OF AN EXISTING EIGHT INCH SEWER LINE OWNED BY THE CITY OF MOAB WHICHCROSSES THE PROSPECTOR VILLAGE LLC PROPERTY.EMMA BLVD Moab City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: May 14, 2019 Title: Public Hearing for the City of Moab’s Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Budget Date Submitted: May 8, 2019 Presenters: TBD Attachment(s): -Attachment A: FY20 Tentative Budget Suggested Motion: I move to close the public hearing for the City of Moab’s Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Budget. Background/Summary: Staff will provide an overview of the proposed budget ahead of the public hearing. The City Council will deliberate at the next scheduled budget workshop, which is set for 5:30 PM on May 16. GF Revenue 14/18/2019 General Fund Revenue FY 20 Tentative Budget Revenue: Taxes 31300 SALES & USE TAXES $2,285,880 31400 FRANCHISE TAXES $140,020 31500 HIGHWAY TAXES $902,640 31600 TRANSIENT ROOM TAXES $1,422,094 31700 RESORT COMMUNITY TAXES $4,631,612 31800 ENERGY TAXES $162,856 Total Taxes $9,545,102 Licenses and permits 32110 BEER LICENSES $6,000 32160 FLAT BUSINESS LICENSES $35,000 32209 SIGN PERMITS $1,000 32210 BUILDING PERMITS - CITY $50,000 32211 BUILDING PERMITS - COMMERCIAL $250,000 32212 1% BLDG PERMIT CHARGE $1,500 32213 PLAN CHECK FEES $60,000 32215 PLANNING & ZONING ALL OTHER FEES $25,000 32290 OTHER LICENSES & PERMITS $2,500 Total Licenses and permits $431,000 Intergovernmental revenue 36973 MISC STATE GRANTS $0 36974 SAN JUAN CO. CONTRIBUTION $5,000 37100 GRAND COUNTY CONTRIBUTION $85,000 37110 GCRSSD RECREATION CTR CONTRIBUTION Total Intergovernmental revenue $90,000 Charges for services 34001 SPECIAL SERVICES BY CITY DEPTS $0 34020 RESTITUTION PAID $0 34200 GARBAGE BILLING / COLLECTION $72,000 34430 REFUSE COLLECTION CHARGES $1,200,000 34510 FILM COMM - SPECIAL EVENT FEES $0 36500 SALE OF MATERIALS & SUPPLIES $0 38600 ALLOWANCE ON DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS $0 Total Charges for services $1,272,000 Fines and forfeitures 35050 A/R 30-DAY PENALTIES $0 Total Fines and forfeitures $0 GF Revenue 24/18/2019 General Fund Revenue FY 20 Tentative Budget Public Safety 33580 PSafety - STATE LIQUOR FUND ALLOTMENT $28,000 34730 PSafety - ANIMAL SHELTER FEES $8,500 34740 PSafety - ANIMAL SHELTER INTERLOCAL $14,500 35001 PSafety - SECURITY SERVICES $2,000 35002 PSafety - SPECIAL EVENT SERVICES $15,000 35003 PSafety - RECORDS FEES $1,000 35004 PSafety - WITNESS FEES $100 35005 PSafety - MISC STATE GRANTS $10,000 35006 PSafety - DONATIONS $12,000 35007 PSafety - EVIDENCE/LOST & FOUND CASH $0 35008 PSafety - VICTIM ADVOCATE GRANT $20,000 35009 PSafety - RESTITUTION $0 35010 PSafety - FINES & PENALTIES $55,000 37200 PSafety - FORFEITURES $3,000 38260 PSafety - ANIMAL DEPOSITS NON-OPERATING $1,500 38721 PSafety - ANIMAL SHELTER - SUNDRY RESALE $0 38722 PSafety - ANIMAL SHELTER SALES TAX $0 Total Public Safety $170,600 Interest 36111 INTEREST PTIF $110,000 Total Interest $110,000 Miscellaneous revenue 36160 PROCEEDS FROM LT DEBT $0 36200 PARK RENTALS $12,000 36201 PARK DEPOSITS $1,000 36220 FILM COMM - SPONSOR/DONATION $20,000 36226 FILM COM. - EQUIP RENTAL FEES $500 36400 SALE OF REAL/PERS. PROPERTY $50,000 36401 INSURANCE REBATE $0 36420 EMPLOYEE MEDICAL CAFE RESIDUAL $0 36900 OTHER $300 36901 DONATIONS $1,000 36902 REBATES $5,000 36903 STUDENT OF THE MONTH DONATIONS $1,000 36904 SUSTAINABILITY GRANTS AND DONATIONS $15,000 36970 INSURANCE INCOME $14,000 Total Miscellaneous revenue $119,800 Contributions and transfers 39920 OVERHEAD PAID FROM STORM WATER FUND $84,186 39930 OVERHEAD PAID FROM SEWER FUND $378,837 GF Revenue 34/18/2019 General Fund Revenue FY 20 Tentative Budget 39935 OVERHEAD PAID FROM CUL WATER FUND $391,747 39940 GENERAL FUND BEG. BALANCE $1,313,409 Total Contributions and transfers $2,168,179 Total Revenue:$13,906,681 GF Expenses 44/18/2019 General Fund Expenditures FY 20 Tentative Budget Transfers and contributions out 48031 TRANSFER TO DEBT SERVICE FUND $208,935 48041 TRANSFER TO HEALTH INSURANCE FUND $300,000 48061 TRANSFER TO CAPITAL PROJ. FUND $250,000 48070 TRANSFER TO AFFORD HOUSING FUND $0 48071 TRANSFER TO MILLCREEK FUND $190,000 48086 TRANSFER - RECREATION FUND $887,753 48098 TRANSFER TO COMM DEV FUND $50,000 Total Transfers and contributions out $1,886,688 Police Department Police - Admin 42110 Police SALARIES & WAGES $1,413,553 42111 Police MOVIE\SECURITY WAGES $0 42113 Police EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $1,185,875 42114 Police OTHER BENEFITS- U/ALLOWANCES $18,720 42115 Police OVERTIME $42,000 42121 Police SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS $18,000 42123 Police TRAVEL\FOOD $27,462 42124 Police OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPPLIES $8,500 42125 Police EQUIPMENT-SUPPL. & MAINTENANCE $58,918 42126 Police BLDG/GRDS-SUPPL. & MAINTENANCE $0 42128 Police TELEPHONE $25,663 42129 Police RENT OF PROPERTY OR EQUIPMENT $3,624 42130 Police MONTHLY FUEL - GASCARD $70,000 42131 Police PROFESSIONAL & TECH. SERVICES $8,000 42133 Police EDUCATION $23,000 42135 Police OTHER $0 42136 Police DISPATCH SERVICES $75,985 42146 Police SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES $32,635 42146.1 Police COMMUNITY OUTREACH $0 42146.2 Police VEST REPLACEMENT $8,000 42146.3 Police INITIAL UNIFORM GEAR 42172 Police SPECIAL EVENTS 42173 Police School Resource Officer - EQUIP. & SUPPLIES $2,000 42174 Police MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT $6,729 Total Police - Admin $3,028,664 Police - Victim's Advocate (formerly Narcotics Task Force) 42310 Victims's Advocate SALARIES & WAGES $47,695 42313 Victims's Advocate EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $35,044 42315 Victims's Advocate OVERTIME $500 GF Expenses 54/18/2019 General Fund Expenditures FY 20 Tentative Budget Total Police - Victim's Advocate $83,238 Police - Beer Tax Funds Eligible Expenses 42510 Beer Tax SALARIES & WAGES $0 42513 Beer Tax EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0 42515 Beer Tax OVERTIME $0 42531 Beer Tax PROFESSIONAL & TECH. SERVICES $0 42546 Beer Tax SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES $0 42574 Beer Tax EQUIPMENT $27,209 Total Police - Beer Tax Funds Eligible Expenses $27,209 Police - Animal control admin 42610 Animal Ctl SALARIES & WAGES $156,131 42611 Animal Ctl SUPERVISOR PAY $0 42613 Animal Ctl EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $107,183 42614 Animal Ctl OTHER BENEFIT - U/ALLOWANCES $2,880 42615 Animal Ctl OVERTIME $11,500 42621 Animal Ctl SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS $660 42623 Animal Ctl TRAVEL\FOOD $1,770 42624 Animal Ctl OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPPLIES $0 42625 Animal Ctl EQUIPMENT-SUPPL. & MAINTENANCE $12,500 42627 Animal Ctl UTILITIES $12,000 42628 Animal Ctl TELEPHONE $5,820 42630 Animal Ctl MONTHLY FUEL - GASCARD $7,000 42631 Animal Ctl PROFESSIONAL & TECH. SERVICES $1,000 42633 Animal Ctl EDUCATION $4,000 42635 Animal Ctl OTHER $500 42646 Animal Ctl SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES $3,402 42650 Animal Ctl GRANT EXPENSES $5,000 42669 Animal Ctl Lease payments $0 42674 Animal Ctl MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT $0 Total Police - Animal control admin $331,346 Total Police $3,470,457 Public Works Department PW Admin 44510 PW Admin SALARIES & WAGES $148,928 44513 PW Admin EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $101,592 44515 PW Admin OVERTIME $1,000 44521 PW Admin SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS $700 GF Expenses 64/18/2019 General Fund Expenditures FY 20 Tentative Budget 44523 PW Admin TRAVEL $1,100 44524 PW Admin OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPPLIES $7,250 44525 PW Admin EQUIPMENT-SUPPL. & MAINTENANCE $0 44526 PW Admin BLDG/GRDS-SUPPL. & MAINTENANCE $0 44527 PW Admin UTILITIES $11,429 44528 PW Admin TELEPHONE $1,820 44529 PW Admin RENT OF PROPERTY OR EQUIPMENT $3,200 44530 PW Admin MONTHLY FUEL - GASCARD $800 44531 PW Admin PROFESSIONAL & TECH. SERVICES $1,000 44533 PW Admin EDUCATION $1,500 44535 PW Admin OTHER $1,000 44546 PW Admin SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES $10,000 44574 PW Admin MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT Total PW Admin $291,319 Streets 44010 Streets SALARIES & WAGES $276,124 44011 Streets SUPERVISOR PAY $0 44013 Streets EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $219,321 44015 Streets OVERTIME $4,000 44021 Streets SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS $1,310 44023 Streets TRAVEL $5,000 44024 Streets OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPPLIES $750 44025 Streets EQUIPMENT-SUPPL. & MAINTENANCE $2,500 44026 Streets BLDG/GRDS-SUPPL. & MAINTENANCE $5,000 44027 Streets UTILITIES $12,000 44028 Streets TELEPHONE $3,960 44029 Streets RENT OF PROPERTY OR EQUIPMENT $600 44030 Streets MONTHLY FUEL - GASCARD $100 44031 Streets PROFESSIONAL & TECH. SERVICES $7,500 44033 Streets EDUCATION $5,200 44035 Streets OTHER $500 44042 Streets STREET LIGHTS $99,500 44046 Streets SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES $4,000 44074 Streets MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT $0 44077 Street SPECIAL PROJECTS $0 440810 Street LEASE PRINCIPAL $0 440820 Streets LEASE INTEREST $0 Total Public Works Streets $647,365 Facilities 44310 Facilities SALARIES & WAGES $259,086 GF Expenses 74/18/2019 General Fund Expenditures FY 20 Tentative Budget 44311 Facilities SUPERVISOR PAY $0 44313 Facilities EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $205,266 44315 Facilities OVERTIME $1,000 44321 Facilities SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS $350 44323 Facilities TRAVEL $600 44324 Facilities OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPPLIES $300 44325 Facilities EQUIP SUPPLIES & MAINT $6,300 44326 Facilities BLDG/GRDS-SUPPL & MAINT $39,500 44326.1 Facilities - CITY CENTER $0 44326.2 Facilities - MARC $0 44326.3 Facilities - CENTER STREET GYM $0 44327 Facilities UTILITIES $5,184 44328 Facilities TELEPHONE $3,300 44329 Facilities RENT OF PROPERTY OR EQUIPMENT $1,000 44330 Facilities MONTHLY FUEL $3,200 44331 Facilities PROFESSIONAL & TECHNICAL $19,500 44333 Facilities EDUCATION $500 44335 Facilities OTHER $0 44346 Facilities SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES $8,000 44374 Facilities MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT $0 44377 Facilities SPECIAL PROJECTS $0 Total Facilities $553,086 Fleet 44410 Vehicle Maintenance SALARIES & WAGES $117,035 44411 Vehicle Maintenance SUPERVISOR PAY $0 44413 Vehicle Maintenance - EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $84,888 44415 Vehicle Maintenance OVERTIME $1,000 44421 Vehicle Maintenance SUB & MEMBER $2,300 44423 Vehicle Maintenance TRAVEL $2,700 44424 Vehicle Maintenance OFFICE EXP $0 44425 Vehicle Maintenance EQUIP/SUPPL & MAINT $48,000 44425.1 Vehicle Maintenance EQUIP MAINT - PARKS $0 44425.2 Vehicle Maintenance EQUIP MAINT - STREETS $0 44425.3 Vehicle Maintenance EQUIP MAINT - FACILITIES $0 44426 Fleet BLDG/GRDS-SUPPL & MAINT $5,000 44428 Vehicle Maintenance TELEPHONE $1,320 44429 Vehicle Maintenance RENT OF EQUIP $500 44430 Vehicle Maintenance MONTHLY FUEL $2,500 44431 Vehicle Maintenance PROF & TECH SVC $4,000 44433 Vehicle Maintenance EDUCATION $1,800 44435 Vehicle Maintenance OTHER $2,000 GF Expenses 84/18/2019 General Fund Expenditures FY 20 Tentative Budget 44446 Vehicle Maintenance SPECIAL DEPT SUPPLIES $12,450 Total Vehicle Maintenance $285,493 Sanitation 44231 Sanitation PROFESSIONAL & TECH. SERVICES $1,200,000 Total Sanitation $1,200,000 Parks 45110 Parks O&M SALARIES & WAGES $392,289 45111 Parks O&M SUPERVISOR PAY $0 45113 Parks O&M EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $263,465 45115 Parks O&M OVERTIME $3,000 45121 Parks O&M SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS $1,020 45123 Parks O&M TRAVEL $4,150 45124 Parks O&M OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPPLIES $0 45125 Parks O&M EQUIPMENT-SUPPL. & MAINTENANCE $3,000 45126 Parks O&M BLDG/GRDS-SUPPL. & MAINTENANCE $20,750 45127 Parks O&M UTILITIES $56,782 45127.1 Solar Purchases $0 45127.2 Parks O&M UTILITIES - Garbage and Recycling $11,732 45127.3 Parks O&M UTILITIES - Water & Sewer $0 45128 Parks O&M TELEPHONE $6,600 45129 Parks O&M RENTALS $750 45130 Parks O&M MONTHLY FUEL - GASCARD $17,500 45131 Parks O&M PROFESSIONAL & TECH. SERVICES $3,750 45133 Parks O&M EDUCATION $3,150 45135 Parks O&M OTHER $750 45146 Parks O&M SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES $19,200 45168 Parks O&M TRAIL MAINTENANCE $0 45169 Parks O&M Lease payments $0 45173 Parks O&M PARK IMPROVEMENTS $3,950 45174 Parks O&M MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT $0 Subtotal Parks O&M $811,838 Total Parks $811,838 Total Public Works Department $3,789,101 Planning and Development Department Planning 41810 Planning SALARIES & WAGES $370,338 41813 Planning EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $249,199 GF Expenses 94/18/2019 General Fund Expenditures FY 20 Tentative Budget 41815 Planning OVERTIME $2,500 41821 Planning SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS $4,100 41822 Planning PUBLIC NOTICES $0 41823 Planning TRAVEL $4,000 41824 Planning OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPPLIES $5,000 41825 Planning EQUIPMENT-SUPPL. & MAINTENANCE $0 41828 Planning TELEPHONE $720 41829 Planning RENTAL $3,160 41830 Planning MONTHLY FUEL - GASCARD $350 41831 Planning PROFESSIONAL & TECH. SERVICES $101,202 41833 Planning EDUCATION $3,500 41835 Planning OTHER $400 41846 Planning SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES $0 41874 Planning MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT $0 Total Planning $744,469 Inspections 42410 Inspection SALARIES & WAGES $72,351 42413 Inspection BENEFITS $51,820 42415 Inspection OVERTIME $1,500 42421 Inspection SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS $2,200 42422 Inspection PUBLIC NOTICES $250 42423 Inspection TRAVEL $1,500 42424 Inspection OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPPLIES $750 42428 Inspection TELEPHONE $1,100 42430 Inspection MONTHLY FUEL $1,000 42431 Inspection PROFESSIONAL & TECH. SERVICES $15,000 42433 Inspection EDUCATION $1,500 42446 Inspection SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES $4,415 42474 Inspection EQUIPMENT $0 42475 Inspection SPECIAL PROJECTS $0 Total Inspections $153,386 Total Planning and Development Department $897,855 Engineering 41910 Engineer SALARIES & WAGES $357,527 41913 Engineer BENEFITS $201,369 41915 Engineer OVERTIME $1,500 41921 Engineer SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS $8,500 41922 Engineer PUBLIC NOTICES $0 41923 Engineer TRAVEL $2,000 41924 Engineer OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPPLIES $3,000 GF Expenses 104/18/2019 General Fund Expenditures FY 20 Tentative Budget 41925 Engineer EQUIP/SUPPLIES & MAINTENANCE $1,000 41928 Engineer TELEPHONE $1,800 41930 Engineer MONTHLY FUEL - GASCARD $2,000 41931 Engineer PROFESSIONAL & TECH. SERVICES $30,000 41931.1 Engineer PLAN REVIEW SERVICES $12,000 41933 Engineer EDUCATION $1,500 41935 Engineer OTHER $200 41946 Engineer SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES $600 41974 Engineer MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT Total Engineering $622,996 Finance 42010 Treasurer SALARIES & WAGES $258,846 42013 Treasurer EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $161,636 42015 Treasurer OVERTIME $500 42021 Treasurer SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS $4,000 42023 Treasurer TRAVEL $2,500 42024 Treasurer OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPPLIES $13,500 42025 Treasurer EQUIPMENT SUPPL. & MAINTENANCE $250 42028 Treasurer TELEPHONE $1,000 42031 Treasurer PROFESSIONAL & TECH. SERVICES $15,750 42033 Treasurer EDUCATION $2,500 42035 Treasurer OTHER $0 42036 Treasurer BANK HANDLING CHARGES $30,000 42046 Treasurer SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES $2,700 42051 Treasurer INSURANCE $1,750 42063 Treasurer CASH OVER & SHORT $0 42074 Treasurer MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT $0 Total Finance $494,932 Recorder Recorder - Admin 41510 Recorder SALARIES & WAGES $190,730 41513 Recorder EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $85,521 41515 Recorder OVERTIME $1,000 41521 Recorder SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS $3,047 41522 Recorder PUBLIC NOTICES $8,000 41523 Recorder TRAVEL\FOOD $4,000 41524 Recorder OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPPLIES $4,000 41525 Recorder EQUIP./SUPPLIES & MAINTENANCE $0 41528 Recorder TELEPHONE $480 41531 Recorder PROFESSIONAL & TECH. SERVICES $23,200 41533 Recorder EDUCATION $2,800 GF Expenses 114/18/2019 General Fund Expenditures FY 20 Tentative Budget 41535 Recorder OTHER $150 41546 Recorder SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES $1,500 41550 Recorder COPIER SUPPLIES $5,300 41574 Recorder MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT $0 415810 LEASE PRINCIPAL $0 415820 LEASE INTEREST $0 Total Recorder - Admin $329,728 Recorder - Information Technology 43010 Info Tech SALARIES & WAGES $0 43013 Info Tech EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0 43024 Info Tech OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPPLIES $1,500 43031 Info Tech PROF & TECH SERVICES $118,060 43031.1 Info Tech WEBSITE $10,166 43031.2 Info Tech GOOGLE FOR GOVERNMENT $20,700 43031.3 Info Tech SECURITY APPLIANCE $1,500 43031.4 Info Tech WIFI - ACCESS LICENSES $1,500 43031.5 Info Tech ANTIVIRUS $5,700 43031.6 Info Tech DNS MONITORING $1,800 43046 Info Tech SPECIAL DEPT SUPPLIES $0 43074 Info Tech MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT $0 Total Recorder - Information Technology $160,926 Recorder - Elections 41722 Election PUBLIC NOTICES $3,000 41723 Election TRAVEL $0 41729 Election RENTAL - VOTING POLLS/PAGER $0 41731 Election PROFESSIONAL/TECH - PRIMARY $2,400 41732 Election PROFESSIONAL/TECH - GENERAL $2,400 41733 Election EDUCATION - INITIATIVE $500 41734 Election EDUCATION - PRIMARY/GENERAL $0 41735 Election PRINTING EXPENSES $5,000 41736 Election ELECTION DINNERS - PRIMARY $0 41737 Election ELECTION DINNERS - GENERAL $0 41746 Election SPECIAL DEPT'L - PRIMARY $0 41747 Election SPECIAL DEPT'L - GENERAL $0 41774 Election MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT $0 Total Recorder - Elections $13,300 Total Recorder $503,954 Central Administration General - admin GF Expenses 124/18/2019 General Fund Expenditures FY 20 Tentative Budget 41610 General SALARIES & WAGES $0 41611 General SALARY DIFFERENTIAL (SURVEY)$0 41613 General EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $0 41621 General SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS $0 41622 General PUBLIC NOTICES $0 41623 General TRAVEL/FOOD $0 41624 General OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPPLIES $0 41625 General EQUIP./SUPPLIES & MAINTENANCE $0 41626 General BLDG/GRDS- SUPPL & MAINTENANCE $0 41627 General UTILITIES $41,000 41628 General TELEPHONE/INTERNET $41,000 41629 General RENT OF PROPERTY OR EQUIPMENT $0 41630 General MONTHLY FUEL - GASCARD $0 41631 General PROFESSIONAL & TECHNICAL $0 41635 General OTHER $0 41646 General SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES $0 41651 General INSURANCE $141,000 41674 General MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT Total General - admin $223,000 Attorney 42210 Attorney SALARIES & WAGES $0 42213 Attorney BENEFITS $0 42231 Attorney PROFESSIONAL & TECH. SERVICES $200,000 42231.1 Attorney PUBLIC DEFENDER $24,000 42231.2 Attorney PROSECUTION SERVICES $36,000 Total General - Attorney $260,000 Council and Mayor 41310 Exec SALARIES & WAGES $75,578 41313 Exec EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $32,582 41321 Exec SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS $9,000 41322 Exec PUBLIC NOTICES $0 41323 Exec TRAVEL\FOOD $13,000 41324 Exec OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPPLIES $1,000 41325 Exec EQUIP/SUPPLIES & MAINTENANCE $0 41326 Executivel BLDG/GRDS- SUPPL & MAINTENANCE $1,000 41328 Exec TELEPHONE $0 41330 Exec MONTHLY FUEL - GASCARD $500 41331 Exec PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE $0 41333 Exec EDUCATION $5,000 41335 Exec OTHER $0 41346 Exec SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES $2,400 GF Expenses 134/18/2019 General Fund Expenditures FY 20 Tentative Budget 41374 Exec MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT $0 Total Council and Mayor $140,060 Administrative - admin 41410 Admin SALARIES & WAGES $488,579 41413 Admin EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $253,214 41415 Admin OVERTIME $1,000 41416 Admin UNEMPLOYMENT $0 41417 Admin EMPLOYEE BONUS PROGRAM $10,000 41421 Admin SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS $5,660 41422 Admin PUBLIC NOTICES $45,000 41423 Admin TRAVEL\FOOD $10,900 41424 Admin OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPPLIES $13,400 41425 Admin EQUIP/SUPPLIES & MAINTENANCE $1,000 41428 Admin TELEPHONE $2,500 41430 Admin MONTHLY FUEL - GASCARD $500 41431 Admin PROFESSIONAL/TECH. SERVICE $74,500 41433 Admin EDUCATION $11,000 41435 Admin OTHER $800 41446 Admin SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES $6,000 41470 Admin SUSTAINABILITY PROJECTS $22,500 41474 Admin MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT $0 41475 Admin GRANT EXPENSES $0 Total Administrative - admin $946,553 Film Commission 42810 Film Comm SALARIES & WAGES $99,006 42813 Film Comm EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $30,086 42815 Film Comm OVERTIME $2,000 42821 Film Comm SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS $5,000 42822 Film Comm ADVERTISING $9,250 42822.1 Film Comm MARKETING $0 42822.2 Film Comm PROMO MATERIALS $0 42823 Film Comm TRAVEL $13,000 42824 Film Comm OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPPLIES $1,000 42825 Film Comm EQUIP./SUPPLIES & MAINTENANCE $500 42828 Film Comm TELEPHONE $800 42829 Film Comm RENTAL $0 42830 Film Comm MONTHLY FUEL - GASCARD $600 42831 Film Comm PROFESSIONAL & TECH. SERVICES $3,000 42833 Film Comm EDUCATION $1,000 42835 Film Comm OTHER $750 42846 Film Comm SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES $500 GF Expenses 144/18/2019 General Fund Expenditures FY 20 Tentative Budget 42874 Film Comm MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT $0 42875 Film Comm SPECIAL PROJECTS $28,700 42876 Film Comm GRANT EXPENSES $0 Total Film Commission $195,192 Community Contributions 46001 Com Contrib - COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS COMBINED $55,000 46005 Com Contrib - MOAB INFORMATION CENTER $10,000 46024 Com Contrib - RECYCLING SERVICES $0 46026 Com Contrib - ARTS PROMOTION $7,000 46027 Com Contrib - AFFORDABLE HOUSING $0 46030 Com Contrib - COMMUNITIES THAT CARE $0 46075 Com Contrib - SHELTER SERVICES $0 46076 Com Contrib LOCAL FIRST $0 46077 Com Contrib - MAYORS GRANTS $0 46077.1 Com Contrib - MAYORS STUDENT OF THE MONTH $1,000 46082 Com Contrib - SOUTHEASTERN ASSO. OF GOV.$0 46084 Com Contrib - GRAND COUNTY/4TH JULY FIREWORK $9,000 Total Community Contributions $82,000 Human Resources 41110 Human Resource SALARIES & WAGES $165,782 41113 Human Resource EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $105,698 41115 Human Resource OVERTIME $500 41121 Human Resource SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS $2,090 41122 Human Resource PUBLIC NOTICES $2,500 41123 Human Resource TRAVEL\FOOD $2,000 41124 Human Resource OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPPLIES $5,500 41125 Human Resource EQUIP./SUPPLIES & MAINTENANCE $0 41128 Human Resource TELEPHONE $360 41131 Human Resource PROFESSIONAL & TECH. SERVICES $90,000 41133 Human Resource EDUCATION $5,000 41135 Human Resource OTHER $5,000 41146 Human Resource SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES $2,462 41150 Human Resource COPIER SUPPLIES $7,000 41174 Human Resource MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT $0 Total Human Resources $393,892 Total Central Administration $2,240,696 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES $13,906,681 Recreation 154/18/2019 Recreation Budget FY 20 Tentative Budget Recreation Revenue (non program specific) Intergovernmental 33561 GRAND COUNTY - RSSD $100,000 33563 SCHOOL DISTRICT $15,000 Total Intergovernmental $115,000 Interest 36100 INTEREST INCOME $1,000 Total Interest $1,000 Miscellaneous 36231 PREP PROGRAM GRANT $0 36560 OTHER INCOME $2,500 36570 GRANTS AND DONATIONS $0 36571 CTC GRANT $0 36757 SAFE PASSAGE GRANT $0 Total Miscellaneous $2,500 Contributions & Transfers 33562 CITY OF MOAB $887,753 39535 RECREATION FUND BEG. BALANCE $117,950 Total Contributions & Transfers $1,005,703 Total recreation revenue (non program specific)$1,124,203 Expenses - Recreation Administration 64010 Recreation SALARIES - DIRECTOR/ASST.$139,549 64011 Recreation SALARY DIFFERENTIAL (SURVEY)$0 64013 Recreation EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $72,805 64015 Recreation OVERTIME $500 64016 Recreation UNEMPLOYMENT $0 64021 Recreation SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS $1,200 64022 Recreation ADVERTISING $3,500 64023 Recreation TRAVEL $0 64024 Recreation OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPPLIES $2,000 64025 Recreation - EQUIP SUPPLIES & MAINT $1,000 64027 Recreation - UTILITIES $0 64028 Recreation TELEPHONE $2,400 64030 Recreation MONTHLY FUEL - GASCARD $350 64031 Recreation PROFESSIONAL & TECHNICAL $3,500 64033 Recreation EDUCATION $5,000 64035 Recreation OTHER $200 64036 Recreation DIRECTOR - TRAVEL $0 64037 Recreation DIRECTOR/EDUCATION $0 64046 Recreation SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES $1,500 Recreation 164/18/2019 Recreation Budget FY 20 Tentative Budget 64065 Recreation FINGER-PRINTING $0 66046 SPECIAL PROJECTS/EQUIPMENT $0 Total Admin Expenses $233,504 Aquatic Center Revenue 34710 MRAC -PREPAID SERVICES $0 34711 MRAC - FITNESS ADMISSIONS $8,500 34712 MRAC - FITNESS MEMBERSHIPS $31,000 34713 MRAC - CITY EMPLOYEES $500 34714 MRAC - SILVER SNEAKERS MEMBERSHIPS $10,000 34715 MRAC - SWIM TEAM $0 34716 MRAC - AQUATIC SPORTS $0 34717 MRAC - SHOWERS $65,000 34718 MRAC - CASH OVER/SHORT $0 34719 MRAC - EMPLOYEE WELLNESS DISCOUNT $0 34720 MRAC - ADMISSIONS/AQUATIC $97,000 34721 MRAC - ADMISSIONS/AQUAT & FITNESS $5,000 34722 MRAC - RETAIL $8,000 34723 MRAC - PROGRAM FEES/ AQUATIC $18,000 34723.1 MRAC PRIVATE SWIM LESSONS $0 34724 MRAC - PROGRAM FEES/FITNESS $11,000 34725 MRAC - CHILD CARE FEES $1,700 34726 MRAC - MEMBERSHIPS/AQUATIC $39,000 34727 MRAC - MEMBERSHIPS/AQUAT & FITNESS $70,000 34728 MRAC - RENTAL FEES $5,500 34729 MRAC - SPECIAL EVENT FEES $750 Total Revenue $370,950 Expense 45208 MRAC MAINTENANCE SALARIES $45,930 45209 MRAC LIFEGUARD SALARIES $304,466 45210 MRAC SALARIES & WAGES $331,944 45211 MRAC AQUATIC PROGRAM SALARIES $35,659 45212 MRAC FITNESS PROGRAM SALARIES $20,129 45213 MRAC EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $152,350 45215 MRAC OVERTIME $500 45216 MRAC UNEMPLOYMENT $0 45221 MRAC SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS $1,500 45222 MRAC ADVERTISING $10,000 45223 MRAC TRAVEL $2,040 45224 MRAC OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPPLIES $3,500 45225 MRAC EQUIPMENT-SUPPL. & MAINTENANCE $6,000 45226 MRAC BLDG/GRDS-SUPPL. & MAINTENANCE $15,000 45227 MRAC UTILITIES $90,900 45228 MRAC TELEPHONE $6,200 45229 MRAC RENT OF PROPERTY OR EQUIPMENT $1,000 45231 MRAC PROFESSIONAL & TECH. SERVICES $9,500 Recreation 174/18/2019 Recreation Budget FY 20 Tentative Budget 45233 MRAC EDUCATION $3,000 45234 MRAC INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS/SUPP.$600 45235 MRAC OTHER $1,500 45246 MRAC SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES $38,350 45261 MRAC SUNDRY EXPENSES-MISCELLANEOUS $7,000 45270 MRAC SWIM TEAM $0 45271 MRAC FITNESS PROGRAMS $0 45273 MRAC AQUATIC PROGRAMS $2,850 45274 MRAC - MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT $0 45275 MRAC SPECIAL EVENTS Total Expense $1,089,918 Total Aquatic Center -$718,968 Recreation and Sports Programs Sports Programs Smart Start - Center St. Gym Revenue 64102 SMART START $0 64103 CENTER ST. GYM FITNESS $0 Total Revenue $0 Expense 64102 - SMART START $0 64103 - CENTER ST. GYM FITNESS $0 Total Expense $0 Total Smart Start - Center St. Gym $0 Soccer Revenue 34539 ADULT SOCCER $2,500 34569 SPRING YOUTH SOCCER $7,665 34570 FALL YOUTH SOCCER $3,690 34571 SOCCER CAMPS $250 34574 INDOOR SOCCER - YOUTH $1,650 34587 INDOOR SOCCER - ADULT $0 Total Revenue $15,755 Expense 64201 Soccer YOUTH SOCCER $4,060 64202 Soccer FALL SOCCER $1,200 64205 Soccer ADULT SOCCER $800 64209 Soccer INDOOR - YOUTH SOCCER $1,695 64210 Soccer WAGES SOCCER $2,826 64213 Soccer SOCCER REFEREE - WAGES $157 64215 Soccer INDOOR - YOUTH DIRECTOR SOCCER $0 Total Expense $10,738 Recreation 184/18/2019 Recreation Budget FY 20 Tentative Budget Total Soccer $5,017 Adult Softball Revenue 34537 TOURNAMENT SOFTBALL - MEN'S $0 34564 MENS SOFTBALL $0 Total Revenue $0 Expense 64427 COED SOFTBALL $1,100 64435 MEN'S SOFTBALL $0 64436 MEN'S SOFTBALL TOURN/DIRECTOR $0 64437 MEN'S SOFTBALL TOURNAMENT $0 64438 MEN'S SOFTBALL TOURN.-UMPIRES $0 Total Expense $1,100 Total Adult Softball -$1,100 Adult Volleyball Revenue 34540 VOLLEYBALL - ADULT COED $1,600 34545 VOLLEYBALL - WOMEN'S $0 Total Revenue $1,600 Expense 64601 CO-ED VOLLEYBALL $1,210 64602 VOLLEYBALL $0 64613 CO-ED VOLLEYBALL - DIRECTOR $0 64614 WOMEN'S VOLLEYBALL - DIRECTOR $0 Total Expense $1,210 Total Adult Volleyball $390 Basketball Revenue 34575 ADULT BASKETBALL $600 34576 JR JAZZ BASKETBALL $3,200 34599 MIDDLE SCHOOL TRVL BASEBALL $0 Total Revenue $3,800 Expense 64803 ADULT BASKETBALL $750 64804 JR JAZZ BASKETBALL $2,200 64805 JR. JAZZ REFEREE SERVICES $3,040 64807 MS BASKETBALL REFEREES $360 64813 Basketball EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $407 Total Expense $6,757 Recreation 194/18/2019 Recreation Budget FY 20 Tentative Budget Total Basketball -$2,957 Youth Volleyball Revenue 34546 VOLLEYBALL - YOUTH SPRING $3,675 34580 YOUTH VOLLEYBALL $1,635 34581 MIDDLE SCHOOL VOLLEYBALL (FALL)$0 Total Revenue $5,310 Expense 64901 YOUTH VOLLEYBALL $1,305 64902 MIDDLE SCHOOL VOLLEYBALL $0 64903 MIDDLE SCHOOL VOLLEYBALL $0 64904 YOUTH SPRING VOLLEYBALL - WAGES $0 64905 YOUTH SPRING VOLLEYBALL $2,450 Total Expense $3,755 Total Youth Volleyball $1,555 Youth Baseball/Softball Revenue 34538 TOURNAMENT SOFTBALL - YOUTH $0 34563 ADULT COED SOFTBALL $2,900 34566 YOUTH/BASEBALL/SOFTBALL $16,882 34567 RECURRING TEAM MEMBERSHIPS $0 34583 YOUTH SPONSOR/BASEBALL $12,800 Total Revenue $32,582 Expense 65111 Youth BB/SB WAGES- MAINTENANCE WORKERS $3,000 65112 Youth BB/SB WAGES- UMPIRES & SCOREKEEPERS $5,880 65113 Youth BB/SB EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $901 65123 Youth BB/SB BASEBALL STATE TOURN. EXPENSES $2,000 65125 Youth BB/SB EQUIPMENT-SUPPLIES & MAINT.$350 65126 Youth BB/SB BASEBALL FIELD MAINTENANCE $1,300 65158 MIDDLE SCHOOL TRVL BASEBALL $0 65173 FIELD MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT $0 65174 YOUTH BASEBALL/SOFTBALL $16,200 65177 UTAH GIRLS SOFTBALL ASSOC $400 65178 UTAH BOYS BASEBALL ASSOCIATION $400 Total Expense $30,431 Total Youth Baseball/Softball $2,151 Youth Football Revenue 34568 YOUTH FOOTBALL $2,790 Recreation 204/18/2019 Recreation Budget FY 20 Tentative Budget 34577 FLAG FOOTBALL $1,365 34578 MIDDLE SCHOOL FOOTBALL $0 34579 FLAG FOOTBALL - ADULT $540 Total Revenue $4,695 Expense 65213 Youth Football BENEFITS $219 65275 YOUTH FOOTBALL $7,320 65280 FLAG FOOTBALL $1,600 65281 FLAG FOOTBALL - ADULT $100 65285 MIDDLE SCHOOL FOOTBALL $0 65286 YOUTH FOOTBALL REFEREES $920 65295 MS FOOTBALL REFEREES $0 Total Expense $10,159 Total Youth Football -$5,464 BMX Expense 65410 BMX WAGES $150 65424 BMX MATERIALS & SUPPLIES $0 Total Expense $150 Total BMX -$150 Pickleball Revenue 34585 PICKLEBALL $0 Total Revenue $0 Expense 65180 PICKLEBALL $200 Total Expense $200 Total Pickleball -$200 Foot Races Revenue 34572 FOOT RACES $4,010 Total Revenue $4,010 Expense 64092 Recreation TURKEY TROT/EASTER EGG HUNT $2,500 Total Expense $2,500 Total Foot Races $1,510 Misc Recreation 214/18/2019 Recreation Budget FY 20 Tentative Budget Revenue 34536 SUMMER CAMP $3,840 34586 DODGE BALL $0 66373 ULTIMATE FRISBEE $400 Total Revenue $4,240 Expense 70080 - DODGEBALL $0 Total Expense $0 Total Misc $4,240 Total Sports Programs $4,992 MARC Revenue 66150 MEMBERSHIP FEES $0 66160 PROGRAM FEES $10,800 66180 MATERIALS - TAXABLE $0 66210 GRANTS AND DONATIONS $45,600 66250 WORKSHOP FEES $0 66271 RENTAL FEES $40,000 66372 SPECIAL EVENTS FEES $39,600 Total Revenue $136,000 Expense 80010 MARC SALARIES & WAGES $144,289 80013 MARC EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $82,049 80014 MARC SALARIES & WAGES - INSTRUCTORS $7,000 80015 MARC SALARIES & WAGES OT $1,100 80016 MARC UNEMPLOYMENT $0 80021 MARC SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS $1,260 80022 MARC ADVERTISING/MARKETING $3,500 80023 MARC TRAVEL $1,900 80024 MARC OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPPLIES $3,900 80025 MARC EQUIP/SUPPLIES & MAINTENANCE $2,000 80026 MARC BLDG GROUNDS SUPPL & MAINT $0 80027 MARC UTILITIES $7,000 80028 MARC TELEPHONE $5,300 80031 MARC PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL SERVICE $1,000 80033 MARC EDUCATION $1,000 80035 MARC OTHER $100 80046 MARC SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES $5,500 80074 MARC MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT $1,325 80077 MARC SPECIAL EVENTS $3,000 80077.1 MARC SPECIAL EVENTS - RED ROCK ARTS FEST $41,500 80078 MARC SPECIAL PROJECTS $0 Recreation 224/18/2019 Recreation Budget FY 20 Tentative Budget Total Expense $312,723 Total MARC -$176,723 Class C Fund 234/18/2019 Class C Fund FY 20 Tentative Budget Revenue: Taxes 33570 Class C TRANSPORTATION TAX $210,795 Total Taxes $210,795 Intergovernmental revenue 33560 Class C CLASS C ROAD FUND $283,050 Total Intergovernmental revenue $283,050 Interest 36100 Class C INTEREST INCOME $5,000 Total Interest $5,000 Contributions and transfers 3650 Proceeds on sale or trade of fixed assets $0 39561 Class C TRANS. FROM EQUITY-B.O.Y. RESV $349,275 Total Contributions and transfers $349,275 Total Revenue:$848,120 Expenses: 40025 Class C EQUIP SUPPLIES & MAINT $0 40026 Class C BLDG/GRDS SUPPLIES & MAINT $0 40027 Class C UTILITIES $0 40028 Class C TELEPHONE $0 40029 Class C EQUIP RENTAL $0 40030 Class C FUEL $18,020 40041 Class C SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES $18,000 40046 Class C SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL $0 40058 Class C ROADBASE - PATCHING $9,000 40070 Class C ASPHALT $400,000 40071 Class C OVERLAY $75,000 40072 Class C CRACK SEALING $20,000 40073 Class C - SPECIAL PROJECTS $210,000 40073.1 Class C CONCRETE ADA Transition Plan $20,000 40073.2 Class C CONCRETE Sidewalk/Ped Ramp Repair $25,100 40074 Class C MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT $53,000 40077 Class C SPECIAL PROJECTS $0 Total Expenditures $848,120 Millcreek fund 244/18/2019 Millcreek Project Fund FY 20 Tentative Budget Revenue: Intergovernmental revenue 33579 FUTURE GRANTS $0 33581 UTAH TRAILS/MILCREEK DR PATH - STATE FUNDS $0 33582 UTAH TRAILS/MILLCREEK DR PATH - LOCAL FUNDS $0 33583 UTAH TRAILS 500 W. UNDERPASS $0 33584 UTAH TRAILS PIPE DREAM TRAIL $0 33585 FIRE/FUEL/REDUCT/REVEG $0 33600 ESCROW FUNDS $0 40002 FIRE/FUEL/REDUCTION/REVEG $0 Total Intergovernmental revenue $0 Contributions and transfers 33210 CONTRIBUTION FROM GENERAL FUND $190,000 39210 MILLCREEK PROJ. FUND/BEG. BAL.$0 Total Contributions and transfers $190,000 Total Revenue:$190,000 Expenses: Transfers and contributions out 40090 INCREASE IN FUND BALANCE $0 Total Transfers and contributions out $0 Millcreek Projects 40003 MILLCREEK/MAIN STREET - WEIR $0 40004 UTAH TRAILS 500 W. UNDERPASS $0 40005 UTAH TRAILS PIPE DREAM $0 40010 SALARIES $0 40013 BENEFITS $0 40031 PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL $30,000 40035 OTHER $0 40041 ACQUISITIONS $0 40048 BMX TRACK $0 40050 BROWNING ROTARY MUSICAL PLAYGROUND GRANT $0 40051 BROWNING TRAILS GRANT $0 40074 SPECIAL PROJ. - GRANT MATCH ONLY $0 40076 TREE EDUCATION/ADVERTISING $0 40086 TREES/IRRIGATION $0 40088 UTAH TRAILS MILLCREEK DR PATH $0 40089 TRAILS $160,000 40090 INCREASE IN FUND BALANCE $0 Total Millcreek Projects $190,000 Total Expenditures:$190,000 CDBG 254/18/2019 Community Development Fund FY 20 Tentative Budget Revenue: Contributions and transfers 39209 COMMUNITY DEV. FUND/BEG. BAL. 39210 CONTRIBUTION FROM GENERAL FUND $50,000 39224 CDGB $75,000 Total Contributions and transfers $125,000 Total Revenue:$125,000 Expenses: Community Development Center Street Gym ADA Elevator $125,000 Total Community development $125,000 Total Expenditures:$125,000 Housing Fund 264/18/2019 Housing Fund FY 20 Tentative Budget Revenue: Charges for services 33410 Grants 36201 Rent/Lease Income 168,000 WAHO fee in lieu assessment 1,000,000 Proceeds from LT Debt 7,702,000 Total Charges for services 8,870,000 Contributions and transfers Contribution from General Fund 0 Total Contributions and transfers 0 Total Revenue:8,870,000 Expenses: Housing 46420 Acquisitions 46421 Debt Retirement 1,934,164 46422 Development Costs 6,400,000 46425 Operation & Maintenance Costs 36,000 46427 O&M UTILITIES 34,000 Total Housing 8,404,164 Total Expenditures:8,404,164 Debt Service Fund 274/18/2019 Debt Service Fund FY 20 Tentative Budget Revenue: Interest 3611 Interest income $0 Total Interest $0 Contributions and transfers 3910 Transfer from general fund $208,935 Transfer from Capital Fund $46,175 Lease Revenue - City Center $37,654 3915 Transfer from housing fund $1,800,000 36236 Contribution from GC Rec District $190,000 Millcreek West road/infrastructure - from Grand Co.$0 Total Contributions and transfers $2,282,764 Total Revenue:$2,282,764 Expenses: Debt Service 4711.1 2003 Sales Tax Rev CC - Principal $85,000 4711.2 2003 Sales Tax Rev CC - Interest $26,425 4712.1 2009 Sales Tax Rev MRAC - Principal $191,000 4712.2 2009 Sales Tax Rev - Interest $0 4713.1 2018 CIB Bond (USU) - Principal $28,000 4713.2 2018 CIB Bond (USU) - Interest $18,175 4714.1 2019 Walnut Lane - Principal Payoff $60,000 4714.1 2019 Walnut Lane - Principal $1,800,000 4714.2 2019 Walnut Lane - Interest $74,164 Total Debt Service $2,282,764 Total Expenditures:$2,282,764 Capital projects 284/18/2019 Capital Projects Fund FY 20 Tentative Budget Revenue: Intergovernmental revenue 36124 GRANTS AND DONATIONS $0 36125 DOG PARK DONATIONS $0 GRAND COUNTY TRANSFER $0 SITLA TRANSFER $0 Total Intergovernmental revenue $0 Interest 36100 INTEREST INCOME $25,000 Total Interest $25,000 Miscellaneous revenue 36220 LEASE REVENUE CITY CENTER $0 36228 UTAH POWER GRANT $15,000 36235 CIB LOAN PROCEEDS $0 36236 CONTRIBUTION FROM REC DISTRICT $0 Total Miscellaneous revenue $15,000 Contributions and transfers 39222 TRANSFER FROM GENERAL FUND $250,000 39225 TRANSFER FROM RECREATION FUND 39561 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND BEG. BAL $921,676 39562 TRANSFER IN FROM MUNICIPAL BLDG SETASIDE 39563 TRANSFER IN FROM USU SET-ASIDE $0 Total Contributions and transfers $1,171,676 Total Revenue:$1,211,676 Expenses: Police 79140 - ANIMAL SHELTER PROJECT 79141 - ANIMAL SHELTER EQUIPMENT $1,242 79142 - ANIMAL SHELTER FF&E 79150 - POLICE EQUIPMENT $20,000 79155 - POLICE VEHICLES $93,702 Shooting range remediation Total Police $114,944 Public Works 79044 - Performance Guarantee Default $0 44070 - ROAD IMPROVEMENTS $500,000 44080 - TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN Capital projects 294/18/2019 Capital Projects Fund FY 20 Tentative Budget 44081 - CITY SHOP/YARD IMPROVEMENTS $110,000 44088 - GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE FACILITIES $75,000 44089 - MILLCREEK DRIVE WEST PROJECT $0 44090 - EQUIPMENT $0 44091 - VEHICLES 45070 - ADA IMPROVEMENTS 78025 - TRAIL & BRIDGE IMPROVEMENTS 78043 - SWANNY PARK RESTROOMS 78045 - PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT/BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS 78046 - PARKS EQUIPMENT & VEHICLES $48,732 Total Public Works $733,732 Administration 74090 - VEHICLES $9,000 77057 - DARK SKY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT $12,000 79045 - USU SETASIDE $0 74095 - Equipment for various admin departments $20,000 74096 - IT - Computer replacement $45,000 74097 - IT - other equipment $22,000 Total Administration $108,000 Recreation 46072 - MARC BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS $15,000 47070 - AQUATIC CENTER IMPROVEMENTS $30,000 47071 - AQUATIC CENTER SET ASIDE $50,000 47072 - AQUATIC CENTER EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT $35,000 77047.1 - 2009 AQUATIC BOND PMT $0 77051 - CENTER STREET GYM MECHANICAL 77056 - BALLFIELD $20,000 78030 - ART IN PUBLIC PLACES %$40,000 78044 - PARK IMPROVEMENTS $25,000 Total Recreation $215,000 Muni Building Authority Debt Service 77042 - PUBLIC BLDG BOND RESERVE $0 77045 - MUNICIPAL BLDG FF&E $0 77046.1 - MUNICIPAL BLDG BOND PMT $0 77046.2 - MUNI BLDG BOND INTEREST $0 Total Debt Service $0 Capital projects 304/18/2019 Capital Projects Fund FY 20 Tentative Budget Administrative Facility 46071 - SOLAR PROJECT $0 77031 - MUNI BLDG PROJECT $0 77050 - BLDG IMPROVEMENTS $15,000 77055 - CITY SUSTAINABILITY $25,000 Total Administrative Facility $40,000 Total Muni Building Authority $40,000 Total Expenditures:$1,211,676 Water Enterprise Fund 314/18/2019 Culinary Water Fund FY 20 Tentative Budget Revenue: Water Operating Income 36300 WATER PENALTIES $5,500 36500 SALE OF MATERIALS & SUPPLIES $0 36900 Water SUNDRY REVENUES $65,000 37100 WATER SALES $1,100,000 37120 TAX ON SHOP WATER SALES 37260 WATER CONNECTION $40,000 37325 Water SPECIAL SERVICES BY CITY DEPARTMENTS 38600 ALLOWANCE ON DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS Total Water Operating Income $1,210,500 Water Non-operating income 36100 - INTEREST INCOME $10,000 36105 - GRANT INCOME 36110 - WATER IMPACT FEE INTEREST INCOME $20,000 36111 - WATER IMPACT FEES $75,000 36112 - WATER IMPACT FEE BEG F.B. 36200 - WATER TANK FINANCING 39535 - W/S - BEG. FUND BALANCE Total Water Non-operating income $105,000 Total Water income $1,315,500 Expenses: Water Operating expense 50009 Water GENERAL FUND O/H 391,747 50010 Water SALARIES & WAGES 231,652 50011 - Water SUPERVISOR PAY 0 50012 - Water SALARY DIFFERENTIAL (SURVEY)0 50013 Water EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 188,459 50015 Water OVERTIME $25,000 50021 Water SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS $3,775 50023 Water TRAVEL $5,000 50024 Water OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPPLIES $1,500 50025 Water EQUIPMENT-SUPPL. & MAINTENANCE 22,500 50026 Water BUILDING SUPPL. & MAINTENANCE 22,000 50027 Water UTILITIES 50,500 50028 Water TELEPHONE 3,300 50029.1 Water RENT OF PROPERTY & EQUIPMENT 8,000 50029.2 Water capital lease expense 0 50030 Water MONTHLY FUEL - GASCARD 12,000 50031 Water PROFESSIONAL & TECH. SERVICES 37,500 50033 Water WATER/EDUCATION 5,800 50035 Water OTHER 7,750 50046 Water SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES 61,140 Water Enterprise Fund 324/18/2019 Culinary Water Fund FY 20 Tentative Budget 50051 Water INSURANCE 1,600 50069 Water DEPRECIATION 185,000 Total Water Operating expense $1,264,223 Water Non-operating expense 50082 Water INTEREST ON BONDS/DEBT SERVICE 14,855 Total Water Non-operating expense $14,855 Total Water Expense $1,279,078 Water Capital 334/18/2019 Culinary Water Fund - Capital Budget FY 20 Tentative Budget Revenue: Operational Income: Net Income $36,422 Add Depreciation $185,000 Provided from Operations:$221,422 Other income: Grant proceeds $3,000,000 Transfer from Water Fund Balance $152,186 Impact fees $125,000 Total Other Income:$3,277,186 Total Income:$3,498,608 Expenses: Projects to be financed: --- Total finance need:$0 Debt Service 2018 Bond $23,608 Total debt service $23,608 Project to pay as you go: New water tank $3,000,000 Replacement Well for Corbin (Design)$100,000 Emma Blvd Water Upgrade $75,000 PW Building Design $50,000 Unanticipated repairs and upgrades $50,000 Water Tank Maintenance $40,000 Total pay as you go:$3,315,000 Total Annual Expense for Projects:$3,338,608 Direct Purchase (aka Equipment) 1611 - Land 1615 - Water shares 1631 - Water wells 1641 - Water tanks 1642 - Water lines 1643 - Meters $136,000 1644 - Fire Hydrants $20,000 1661.2 - Equipment - water $4,000 1665 - Office furniture and equipment 1671 - Autos and trucks $0 Total Direct Purchase:$160,000 Water Capital 344/18/2019 Culinary Water Fund - Capital Budget FY 20 Tentative Budget Total Capital Requirement:$3,498,608 Sewer Enterprise Fund 354/18/2019 Sewer Enterprise Fund - Operations FY 20 Tentative Budget Revenue: Sewer Operating Income 38600 - ALLOWANCE ON DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS 56900 - Sewer SUNDRY REVENUE $100,000 57200 - SEWER EXISTING FACILITY FEE $60,000 57210 - SEWER STUDIES FEE $0 57300 - SEWER SERVICES CHARGES $1,150,000 57325 - Sewer SPECIAL SERVICES BY CITY DEPTS $5,000 57350 - Sewer SPANISH VALLEY SEWER $350,000 57440 - SEWER CONNECTION $25,000 Total Sewer Operating Income $1,690,000 Sewer Non-operating income 36500 - SALE OF MATERIALS & SUPPLIES 39535 - W/S - BEG. FUND BALANCE 56100 - Sewer INTEREST INCOME $50,000 SJSVSSD Sewer Impact Fees $319,000 56108 - GWSSA SEWER IMPACT FEES - OFFSET $42,479 56109 - GWSSA SEWER IMPACT FEES $200,000 56110 - SEWER IMPACT FEE INTEREST $1,500 56111 - SEWER IMPACT FEES $350,000 Total Sewer Non-operating income $962,979 Total Sewer Income $2,652,979 Expenses: WRF 60009 Sewer GENERAL FUND O/H $378,837 60010 Sewer WRF SALARIES & WAGES $194,797 60011 Sewer WRF SUPERVISOR PAY 60013 Sewer WRF EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $117,536 60015 Sewer WRF OVERTIME $7,000 60021 Sewer WRF SUBSCRIPTIONS & MEMBERSHIPS $1,000 60023 Sewer WRF TRAVEL $1,500 60024 Sewer WRF OFFICE EXPENSE & SUPPLIES $750 60025 Sewer WRF EQUIPMENT SUPPL. & MAINTENANCE $13,500 60026 Sewer WRF BUILDING SUPPL. & MAINTENANCE $2,800 60027 Sewer WRF UTILITIES $150,000 60028 Sewer WRF TELEPHONE $2,200 60029 Sewer WRF RENT OF PROPERTY & EQUIPMENT $2,000 60030 Sewer WRF MONTHLY FUEL - GAS CARD $8,000 60031 Sewer WRF PROFESSIONAL & TECH. SERVICES $55,000 Sewer Enterprise Fund 364/18/2019 Sewer Enterprise Fund - Operations FY 20 Tentative Budget 60033 Sewer WRF EDUCATION $1,500 60035 Sewer WRF SHIPPING\FREIGHT $6,000 60046 Sewer WRF SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES $35,000 60069 Sewer DEPRECIATION $150,000 Total WRF $1,127,420 Sewer Collection System 60029.1 Sewer COLLECTIONS Capital Lease Expense 61010 Sewer COLLECTION SALARIES & WAGES $170,321 61011 - Sewer COLLECTION SUPERVISOR PAY 61013 Sewer COLLECTION EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $117,751 61015 Sewer COLLECTION OVERTIME $8,500 61021 Sewer COLLECTION SUBSCRIP & MEMBER $4,300 61023 Sewer COLLECTION TRAVEL $3,000 61024 Sewer COLLECTION OFFICE EXP & SUPPLIES $500 61025 Sewer COLLECTION EQUIP SUPPLIES & MAINT $20,000 61026 Sewer COLLECTION BLDG/GRDS SUPPLIES & MAINT $500 61027 Sewer COLLECTION UTILITIES $1,000 61028 Sewer COLLECTION TELEPHONE $3,000 61029 Sewer COLLECTION RENTALS $1,000 61030 Sewer COLLECTION MONTHLY FUEL $8,500 61031 Sewer COLLECTION PROFESSIONAL & TECH $35,000 61033 Sewer COLLECTION EDUCATION $5,000 61035 Sewer COLLECTION FREIGHT $2,000 61046 Sewer COLLECTION SPEC DEPT SUPPLIES $40,000 Total Sewer Collection System $420,372 Sewer Non-operating expense 60082 Sewer INTEREST ON SEWER BONDS $229,946 60084 Sewer IMPACT FEE WAIVERS 60085 IMPACT FEE WAIVERS 60091 Benefit expense-change in NPL/NPA (GASB 68) 60092 Pension expense (GASB 68) Total Sewer Non-operating expense $229,946 Total Sewer Expense $1,777,738 Sewer Capital 374/18/2019 Sewer Capital Budget FY 20 Tentative Budget Revenue: Operational income: Net Income from Operations $142,208 Add Depreciation $150,000 Provided from Operations:$292,208 Other income: Transfer from Sewer Fund Balance $99,184 Impact fees $635,000 Total other income:$734,184 Total Income:$1,026,392 Expenses: Projects to be financed: --- Total finance need:$0 Debt service: WRF $635,000 2018 Sewer Bond $106,392 Total debt service:$741,392 Projects pay as you go: PW Building Design $50,000 Birch St & Locust St Reconstruct $125,000 Total pay as you go:$175,000 Total Annual Expense for Projects:$916,392 Direct Purchase (aka Equipment) 1651 - Sewage treatment facilities $0 1652 - Sewer lines $0 1653 - Manhole Replacement Project $75,000 1661.1 - Equipment - general 1661.3 - Equipment - sewer $35,000 1665 - Office furniture and equipment 1671 - Autos and trucks Total Direct Purchase:$110,000 Total Capital Requirement:$1,026,392 Stormwater Utility Fund 384/18/2019 Stormwater Utility Enterprise Fund FY 20 Tentative Budget Revenue: Operating income 36450 STORM WATER DRAINAGE FEE $285,190 36460 NON-POINT SOURCE FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE $0 Total Operating Income $285,190 Non-Operating Income 3340 STATE GRANT 36110 INTEREST INCOME 36112 TFER FROM FUND BALANCE 36210 TRANSFER FROM GENERAL FUND Total Non-operating income $0 Total Storm Water Income $285,190 Expenses: Operating expense 40009 Storm wtr GENERAL FUND O/H $84,186 40010 Storm wtr SALARIES & WAGES $50,436 40011 - Storm wtr SUPERVISOR PAY 40013 Storm wtr EMPLOYEE BENEFITS $23,677 40031 Storm wtr PROFESSIONAL & TECH. SERVICES $25,000 40046 Storm wtr SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL SUPPLIES 40069 Storm wtr DEPRECIATION 40075 Storm wtr SPECIAL PROJECTS Total Operating expense $183,299 Non-operating expense 40090 Storm wtr TRANSFER TO SURPLUS FUND BAL.$0 Total Non-Operating Expense $0 Total Storm Water Expense $183,299 Stormwater Capital 394/18/2019 Storm Water Utility Enterprise Fund - Capital FY 20 Tentative Budget Revenue: Operational income: Net Income from Operations $101,891 Add Depreciation Provided from Operations:$101,891 Transfer from Storm Water Fund Balance $1,043,109 Finance need $400,000 Total Income $1,545,000 Expenses: Projects: Kane Creek Heavy Maintenance $400,000 PW Building Design $25,000 400 East Storm Drain with County (Design)$60,000 Misc Storm Water Projects unanticipated $35,000 Riparian Area Study and Restoration $25,000 Stewart Canyon Drainage Project (US191 Widening)$1,000,000 Total Projects:$1,545,000 Direct Purchase (aka Equipment) 1661.1 - Equipment - General $0 Total Direct Purchase:$0 Total Capital Requirement:$1,545,000 Health Fund 404/18/2019 Health Insurance Fund FY 20 Tentative Budget Revenue: Charges for Services 3410 Health Reimbursement Arrangement Premiums $540,117 3411 Dental Premiums $45,000 3412 Health Savings Account Premiums $120,000 3413 Medical Insurance Premiums $1,296,000 3414 Life Insurance Premiums $5,000 3415 Vision Insurance Premiums $14,500 Total Charges for Services $2,020,617 Interest 3611 Interest income $0 Total Interest $0 Contributions and transfers 3910 Transfer from general fund $300,000 Total Contributions and transfers $300,000 Total Revenue:$2,320,617 Expenses: Services 4151 Third party administrator $0 4152 Medical expenses $400,000 4153 Dental Expenses $35,000 4154 Health Savings Account Funding Expense $120,000 4155 Medical Insurance premiums $1,296,000 4156 Vision Insurance premiums $14,500 4157 Life Insurance premiums $5,000 4158 Employee Assistance Program $2,700 4159 TeleMedicine $3,700 4160 Bank charges and fees $0 4161 Wellness Program $12,000 4265 Transfer to Fund Balance $431,717 Total Services $2,320,617 Total Expenditures:$2,320,617 Moab City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: May 14, 2019 #: Click here to enter text. Title: Request for Amplified Music at Old City Park on August 23, 2019 for 40th Birthday Party wedding. Date Submitted: May 3, 2019 Staff Presenter: Carmella Galley Attachment(s): Request Email Options: Approve, deny, or modify. Recommended Motion: “I move to approve allowing amplified music, Stonefed, at Old City Park on August 23, 2019 for Uriia Macindoe Birthday Party.” Background/Summary: Use of amplified sound equipment at Old City Park is not permitted without special permission of the City Council. Carmella Galley <carmella@moabcity.org> Amplified Music uriia macindoe <umacindoe@hotmail.com>Fri, May 3, 2019 at 8:11 PM To: Carmella Galley <cgalley@moabcity.org> City Council, I have rented old City Park on August 23rd, 2019 for my 40th birthday party. We would like to request we be allowed to have Stonfed play at the party. We will abide by city park rules and cease the amplified music by 9:00pm uriia macindoe Moab City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: May 14, 2019 #: Click here to enter text. Title: Approval of Special Event Permit and Special Use of City Park for a Fourth of July Celebration Date Submitted: April 12, 2019 Staff Presenter: Carmella Galley Attachment(s): Special Event Application Special Use of City Park Application Options: Approve, deny, or modify. Recommended Motion: I move to approve “Special Event Permit and the Special Use of a City Park for a Fourth of July Celebration.” Background/Summary: This event was previously an annual community event. Mayor Niehaus, the Chamber of Commerce and staff from the MARC, are hoping to bring it back to life. The request is for the use of Swanny City Park to be used to hold the festivities. A live band has been secured as entertainment as well as local businesses providing booths/tents for entertainment and information. As this is a joint effort between the City and the Chamber of Commerce, fees have not been assessed. It will involve city employees with set up and break down as well as possible patrolling of the area during the event. The Special Events Review Committee has reviewed the application and there are no issues with the submitted plan. The request for the stage to remain overnight until the end of the July 5th Free Concert the next night has also been approved. No other vehicles will be allowed on the grass at the park. All other Park Rules are to be followed as well. Date Received Application: Receipt Number. Date Paid Amount Paid: SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF MOAB City of Moab Special Events 217 East Center Street Moab, UT 84532 M OA_B Phone: 435-259-5121 E-mail: events@moabcity.org APPROVALS: City: Date: Fire: Date: Conditions of approval: Other Staff Approval: Date TYPE OF ACTIVITY check all that apply: ❑ Film Production ❑ Parade ❑ Outdoors Sales ❑ Fun Run ❑ Cycling ❑ 5K ❑ Training Event Y Festival ❑ Sporting ❑ 10K ❑ Block Party ❑ Religious ❑ Dance ❑ Other Please print or type EVENT NAME: 1. Location of Event: 2. Location of Event: 3. Name of Organization: Lek `A 4. Date (s) of Event: Z.0 I GI Start Date: Start Time: 5. EVENT DETAILS Event Location 1 Date(s):. ( 4 i t C.)b el Start time: End time: Set-up Date(s): \ ' Start time: End time: Clean-up Date(s): Start time: End time: Event Location 2 Date(s): Start time: End time: Set-up Date(s): Start time: End time: Clean-up Date(s): Start time: End time: Is this a recurring event9 If yes; daily, weekly or other? Is this an Annual Event? If yes; same date and place? 5. PARTICIPANTS Number of participants expected: Number of Volunteers/Event Staff: -2 L� 1111 Open to the Public ❑ Private Group/Party If event is open to the public, is it: ❑ Entrance Fee/Ticketed Event? ❑ Fee for Participants/ Racers/Runners Only 2 6. APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of Applicant: C \-E o f M 00 b C �� �� :,_� c-,r t r r c Address: r7 c C E \r 1 f_f S U 4 I Day Phone: a. "? ? sci ( to 59 CeW0ther: Mailing Address (if different): E-Mail: VYl al\f D le" ,� MOO 19C i 0 fq Event Web Address (if applicable): Alternate Contact For Event: , -1 Z ' IN 1 O. i Cell/other: E-mail: 1,1101 C 6. d :. erlij r ' '! - rri u Cell Phone/Other::-'� tE, c-r ? t 2 3 7. VENDORS/FOOD/ALCOHOL check all that apply Vendors/Merchants Are Vendors Merchants Selling Products or Services? Yes No If yes, Temporary Sales Tax Numbers are required from State Special Event Tax Division 801-297-6303 Is Food available at the event \.1 Yes U No Is the food (please_ check all that apply) p oss, 0,e ,f-OLX1 -1 i'c,.. etAj, \\ O\'k' co 4 ( Given away i Catered by restaurants/Vendors Prepared on site Events which have Food available must contact the SE Utah Health Dept., for approval 435-259-5602 "-t-. CC"' %-e- II Alcoholic Beverages will be available at the event I I Yes \ No Please check applicable Beer Stands Fenced in Beer Garden Selling, Serving, Giving Away, Alcohol at an event requires City Council, and State Of Utah Department of Alcoholic Beverage Licensing for state approval 801-977-6800 8. TENTS/STAGES/STRUCTURES (include details on site map) Tents/Pop-up Canopies ❑ Yes ❑ No How many Tents/Pop-up Canopies will be used for the event? Dimensions of Tents/Pop-up Canopies: All Enclosed Tents and Pop-up Canopies require inspections from the Moab Valley Fire Department 435-259-5557 and may be staked into the ground with Parks Superintendents permission. © Temporary Stage Dimensions: r0 \k -7e5.7-11.c-a r Description of Tents/Canopies/Stage, etc.: 9. SITE SETUP/SOUND check all that apply (please include details on site map) Fencmg/Scattoldmg Barricades — - Portable Sanitary Units ye Music if yes, check all that apply Amplified PA/Audio System Type/Description: Acoustic Fireworks / Fire Performances / Open Flame Propane/Gas On site Trash/Recycle Bin coordination On Site X[ r ` ' 4 tf-.a 1 S (must obtain privately) (must obtain privately) (must obtain privately) Requires approval from Moab Valley Fire Dept. (435) 259-5557 Requires approval from Moab Valley Fire Dept. (435) 259-5557 Monument Waste (435) 259-6314 /O. ROAD & SIDEWALK USE please include details on site map ❑ Will Roads & Sidewalks Be Used? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ Are you requesting Road Closures? ❑ Yes ® No An Encroachment Permit is required for Road Closures and Sidewalk Use. To obtain the permit, please contact Moab City Public Works Dept., 435-259-7485. U Road Use and Closure Location: U Sidewalk Use Location: U Parade Location: U Will stay on sidewalks and follow pedestrian laws Number of Floats: / /. Application fee is based on attendance as followed: Due at time of submittal (Other fees may apply after review by Events Committee) ❑ $466.00 for attendance under 300 ❑ $820.00 for attendance over 300 C 1 k V 0- h.i fl0, Total: $ By submitting a signed application, the applicant certifies that falsifying any information on this application constitutes cause for rejection or revocation of the Permit. �z Oo11�c! Print Applicant's Name Applints Signature Date 4 SW817/7y Park Chamber of Commerce / City of Moab July 4th Eve�t -100 North Street Aquatic Center Playground Parr Drive 4 1 To Main St. One Block 3 Picnic Tables d---0 Toilets? Stage /00 West Sfree! Chamber of Commerce activities &Tents Possible Food Trucks 6 Covered Picnic Tables n 100 50 0 100 200 N SCALE 1" = 100' FEET Page 12 of 26 EVENT DESCRIPTION PLEASE DESCRIBE YOUR EVENT IN DETAIL ADD ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR PAGES • Please be sure to include any elements of your event that will help with the approval of the event. A time -line of the event would also be helpful. .-3 o � }kj� `J ,/1, 1'.J ._4 i� 04- _1 i%J � �` i�l '? i\ '-Ir, 1-\ ' 1 i � ✓h � � a b V 1 -;- 1 ..ve. -�:+ � r c> \iv\ � L.) � \k \, \AA..� '\.rti..11� Q 7", � v A `7.= °.-I,' C).r � 1 k 't + �. (4'. itks' ,�.'4n. -rC ` -\ -0),r a. A d c \A.‘ o\• 3�,.r c t_ L\ r c ct l \o U ,- i` C �.. �,• Gt J \,\ ti l • /. i R I /' l 5 SPECIAL BUSINESS EVENT LIST OF VENDORS (MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF MOAB PRIOR TO THE EVENT) 5.09.030 Sales Tax Collection. A. Unless exempted by state law, each special business event licensee shall be responsible for obtaining a state sales tax license and shall require that all vendors either: 1. Provide proof of a sales tax license and agree to be responsible for direct remittance of all sales tax proceeds to the state; or 2. Execute a sales tax remittance agreement whereby the vendor delivers sales tax proceeds to the licensee for remittance to the state under the licensee's sales tax license. NAME OF EVENT: `�:r, �`.i�J` s; P' t �' 1 t e G DATE(S) OF EVENT: i 1( 2 0 ( t BUSINESS NAME OWNERS NAME, ADDRESS, PHONE # ITEMS TO BE SOLD TEMPORARY SALES TAX LICENSE NO./SALES TAX ID iiv X o b -1 a l f\ t)'( 0 '' l 6�_ e -4 0 X -rar a v11 v-e v c(y r 09/08/03 j i? SoUtHE� tiro HEALTH DEPARTMENT Special Event Name: 2 . Primary Contact: Phone: Secondary Contact: Phone: Dates of Operation: Price: Tel: 435.637.3671 Location: Moab: Tel: 435.259.5602 http://www.seuhealth.com Email: SPECIAL EVENT FOOD SERVICE PERMIT APPLICATION The Southeastern Utah Health Department has adopted by reference the current State of Utah, Department of Health, Food Service Sanitation Rule R392-100. The Health Department requires that the special event be responsible for ensuring compliance by food vendors. The Health Department requires that every food booth/truck have at least one person with a valid Food Handlers certificate present during all hours of operation. The Food Service Sanitation Rule requires all food booths to be available for inspection during all hours of operation by the health department. One to Three Day Events Number of Food Vendors Event Plans to Have: Greater than Three Day Events Number of Food Vendors Event Plans to Have: X $20.00 X $50.00 Make Checks Payable to SEUHD Carbon or Emery County Events Mail to: P.O. BOX 800, Price Utah, 84501 Grand County Events Mail to: 575 S. Kane Creek Blvd., Moab Utah, 84532 EVENT MUST PROVIDE A LIST OF VENDORS AND THEIR CONTACT INFORMATION AS WELL AS THEIR MENU ONE WEEK PRIOR TO THE FIRST DAY OF THE EVENT Signature: Date: CITY OF M oAg UTAH City of Moab APPLICATION FOR THE SPECIAL USE OF CITY PARKS Swanny Park, located, between 100 and 200 West from 30 to 400 North, is a non -reservation park that is meant to be open to the public on a first -come, first served basis. Special Use of Swanny Park and other non -reservation parks within the City is subject to approval by the Moab City Council. The City Council may approve use applications for events that provide clear benefits to the community. Requests for usage by private businesses that serve a limited clientele will not be approved. This application must be submitted, along with any special events license application, to the City Events Coordinator's office at not less then 90 (ninety) days prior to the scheduled event. Upon approval of the application by the City Council, a Special Park Use Permit will be issued upon payment of the appropriate fees, provided for in the Schedule of Fees. PLEASE PRINT OR FILL ELECTRONICALLY Name of Person Responsible for Use of Park: Name of Organization and Event if applicable: Address - Day Phone: Email: Proposed Park Usage Information Which park to you intend to use? Swanny Park- X Other (please indicate name of park). Please indicate the proposed dates and times of use: Proposed Start Date: 7.' Start Time: am%pm End Time. am/pm Proposed End Date: Start Time: I am/pm� End Time. am/pm Please specify what areas of the park are proposed for use. For Swanny Park, please show in detail on the attached diagrams, which areas of the park are proposed to be used. Show locations of all structures and facilities. Number of participants you expect: ` Number of spectators that you expect: c'' Please describe structures, tents, canopies, portable restrooms, etc. that you propose to set up at the park: Will amplification be required for your event? Yes X No Please specify any electrical needs for your event: We._ 1N\11 V1 P1 P +Pr ' r r CD{ 444 54aa(c Please describe the parking and traffic plan for your event. Location of parking, signage, traffic control devices, use of volunteers, etc. should be described. If you anticipate any street closures for your event, please describe below, and show on the accompanying diagram. PLEASE COMPLETE OTHER SIDE Do you intend for the park to be open to the public during your event? Yes ' No Do you intend to serve/sell alcohol (if so, additional requirements and fees apply) Yes_ No For non-Swanny Park events: Do you plan to charge for admission to the park? Yes Please describe any security or crowd control measures you plan for use of the park: No NIA For groups over 100 people, please describe your refuse control and recycling plan: \Ale vu.,\1 ( (),)a,;k:c vrfc--1,ra(\v.a-1-cM)vm~1,,u1c-v\1 , Please describe your clean-up plan during and after the event: \(nk1O.\.�"ev5 .t.1P\\ (10(1,, Please describe your restroom facility plan: :Apvti rt"t) \ l c) \ ��.\ ..r /' n v\ cc Other Information Please describe how your organization, your event, and/or your use of the park will provide broad -based benefits to the community: n " . ); T1 I A n [\. -Grey. ,-A Please specify and describe other community or city facilities that you plan to use: Have you applied for a Special Event Permit for this use? Yes No Will you be able to provide proof of insurance, showing the City as an additional insured? Yes No I certify that the information contained in this application is true and correct. I agree to abide by the City of Moab Parks Policies and any conditions attached to this permit. Signature of Contact Person: fie,640./4 Date* immisimaiimisisimily", Office Use Only Public Works Review: Police Department Review. Administrative Review. Park Use Fee: Date Fee Paid: Date of City Council Approval: Insurance Received: Final Set up Diagram Received. Special Conditions or Requirements: Other Required Permits and Approvals 2��1 gLi Moab City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: May 14, 2019 Title: Resolution 27-2019 - Moab Parking Management Study. Disposition: Approve, Deny, Modify Staff Presenter: Chuck Williams, City Engineer Attachment(s): –Attachment 1 - Resolution 27-2019 –Attachment 2 - Moab Parking Management Study DRAFT Recommended Motion: I move to approve “Resolution 27-2019 adopting the Moab Parking Management Study.” Background/Summary: Much of Moab’s economy centers on downtown shops, restaurants, hotels, and other services. The recently completed Moab Downtown Plan addressed parking at a high-level mentioning that “parking was the number one issue the team heard during the community input process” and the plan specifically protected all the on-street parking in the Downtown area. This study was designed to expand upon the Downtown Plan by inventorying parking spaces, then going out to make field observations of which parking spaces are the most occupied, when people were using them, and for how long. This information allows us to answer questions like: does Moab have enough parking? Can it be used more efficiently? The goals of this study were to: •Create a detailed inventory of public (and some private) parking spaces in the study area •Measure, evaluate, and analyze parking utilization of those spaces •Calculate average parking duration for all areas •Calculate expected parking demand and compare it to observed utilization •Recommend parking management strategies to reduce the negative impacts of parking A CITY OF MOAB RESOLUTION NO. 27-2019 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE MOAB PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY The following findings describe the reasons for this resolution and explain its purpose: a.The City is concerned about certain parking issues within the City. b.These concerns include availability of sufficient parking in the Downtown Area, relocation of parking necessitated by the upcoming HWY 191 widening project, safety of all vehicles including bicycles, and addressing the large number of oversized and trailered vehicle parking. c.The City has developed a Moab Parking Management Study to consider these and other parking issues. d.The City Council has reviewed the Draft Moab Parking Management Study dated April, 2019. Therefore, the City of Moab resolves as follows: 1.The Moab Parking Management Study is approved and City staff is to use it as a Guide when addressing parking issues within the City 2.This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon passage. PASSED AND APPROVED by a majority of the City of Moab City Council, This 14th day of May, 2019. By:___________________________________________ Emily S. Niehaus, Mayor Date Attest: By:___________________________________________ Sommar Johnson, Recorder Date Moab Parking Management Study 2 PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY 3 PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND ........................................................................................4 2. PARKING INVENTORY & DATA COLLECTION ..........................................................................7 STUDY AREA .....................................................................................................................................7 PARKING INVENTORY ...........................................................................................................................8 METHODOLOGY ..................................................................................................................................9 PEAK PARKING DAYS: DAILY APPROACH VOLUME EAST/WEST STREETS ................................................................10 3. PARKING UTILIZATION ..................................................................................................11 TRENDS ..........................................................................................................................................12 OVERALL PARKING & PEAK HOUR UTILIZATION .............................................................................................13 AREA-SPECIFIC UTILIZATION .................................................................................................................14 4. PARKING DURATION ...................................................................................................28 DURATION CALCULATION & METHOD ........................................................................................................28 PARKING DURATION BY AREA ...............................................................................................................29 5. PARKING DEMAND .....................................................................................................30 ANALYSIS AREA ...............................................................................................................................30 METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................................30 PARKING DEMAND OVER TIME ................................................................................................................31 PARKING DEMAND – WEEKDAY ..............................................................................................................32 PARKING DEMAND – WEEKEND .............................................................................................................33 OBSERVED UTILIZATION VS. PREDICTED DEMAND ........................................................................................34 OBSERVED UTILIZATION VS. PREDICTED DEMAND - BY LOCATION ......................................................................35 6. PARKING RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................................................36 CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................................................36 RECOMMENDATIONS ..........................................................................................................................37 4 PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY 1. INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND Moab is a diverse and vibrant community with thousands of residents and well over a million visitors a year. Much of Moab’s economy centers around downtown shops, restaurants, hotels, and other services. The recently completed Moab Downtown Plan addressed parking at a high-level mentioning that “parking was the number one issue the team heard during the community input process” and the plan specifically protected all the on-street parking in Downtown. But the Moab Downtown Plan never provided numbers or analysis of where and for how long people were using parking, and it never included parking demand projections. This study was designed to measure parking utilization and see which parking spaces are the most occupied, when people were using them, and for how long. This information allows us to answer the questions like, Does Moab have enough parking? and Can it be used more efficiently? PROJECT GOALS The goals of this study were to: • Create a detailed inventory of public (and some private) parking spaces in the study area (Chapter 2) • Measure, evaluate, and analyze parking utilization of those spaces (Chapter 3) • Calculate average parking duration for all areas (Chapter 4) • Calculate expected parking demand and compare it to observed utilization (Chapter 5) • Recommend parking management strategies to reduce the negative impacts of parking (Chapter 6) This report is organized into chapters for each of the study goals. Each chapter details the methodologies used Downtown Moab: the center of the study area 5 PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY and the outcomes of the parking analysis. It paints a comprehensive picture of parking in Moab and Chapter 6 includes detailed recommendations for enhancements that can improve the parking situation in certain areas. PREVIOUS STUDIES We acknowledge that several previous studies have addressed parking in Moab. This study builds off of those previously completed plans and we refer to those studies throughout this report. Previous studies include: The Moab Downtown Plan by Downtown Redevelopment Services and Avenue Consultants, available here: https://arcg.is/1neDrO. The City of Moab set about developing a comprehensive plan to identify resident’s needs and wants in the downtown area, specifically, the creation of a downtown that is walkable and resident-friendly. Vehicle parking within the downtown area was the number one issue brought up during the comprehensive community input process. Understanding the balance between available parking and demand is important to the long-term economic success of the downtown area. To understand this relationship, our team completed a detailed analysis of which spaces are most commonly occupied and how often vehicles are parked. This information was used to formulate parking recommendations for this plan. The Arches Area Recreation Hotspot Congestion Relief Project, by Jones & DeMille Engineering and Rural Community Consultants, available here: https://spark.adobe.com/page/qTc6Qu4syA2Gq (further information is available here: https://arcg.is/15T9uG). The world-class recreational amenities in Moab have generated significant tourism activity, and all expectations are that this will continue to grow, creating stress on the local infrastructure. Moab's Main Street is particularly impacted because, unlike other recreation destination areas in Utah, this corridor is also a major freight traffic route. Parking in Moab is severely constrained, especially during the tourist season. All stakeholders agreed that the centralized parking for visitors and employees at a downtown transportation hub would likely mitigate downtown congestion significantly, if it existed in tandem with other design changes to Main Street. Use of centralized parking facilities can be encouraged by implementing a permitting system for nearby residential neighborhoods. Utilization of parking lots for trailers will be high if the locations are safely lit and monitored. The US-191: Moab Signal & Pedestrian Study, by Fehr & Peers, available here: www.fehrandpeers.com/moab. In this study, UDOT and Moab City officials sought to understand mobility trade-offs between vehicle progression and enhancing the pedestrian accommodations on Main Street. This study evaluated a number of potential enhancements, including parking, that have been identified to improve multi-modal mobility along Moab's Main Street. 6 PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY The UDOT Main Street (US-191) Corridor Preservation Study, available here: https://tinyurl.com/US-191-corridor-preservation, which developed a corridor agreement guiding the placement of future private driveway and public/private street accesses on Main Street. This impacts parking as well as promotes greater adherence to UDOT Access Management standards to balance safety and traffic flow. The ongoing UDOT Main Street (US-191) Moab Bypass Planning Study, available here: http://arcg.is/0XH0W5. As part of the UDOT Recreational HotSpots program, UDOT, in cooperation with Moab and Grand County, evaluated the potential costs and benefits of a Main Street (US-191) Bypass around downtown Moab in order to improve the sense of place, alleviate the increasing freight congestion, mediate parking woes, and foster a comfortable and vibrant downtown. 7 PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY 2. PARKING INVENTORY & DATA COLLECTION Study Area The study area was developed by Moab City to represent the portion of the city with the most used public parking spaces This includes Downtown Moab (100 West to 100 East, and 200 South to 400 North), Center Street and 100 North (100 West to 300 East), Swanny Park, Williams Way, and 400 East. The study area is presented on the map below. Parking spaces evaluated are shown in red. 8 PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY Parking Inventory Moab's downtown parking supply consists of a mix of on-street parking, public parking lots, and other private lots. A total of 1,462 parking spaces were evaluated for the utilization analysis of which 1107 were on-street parking. The on-street parking consists of 470 angle parking stalls, 622 parallel parking stalls, and 15 accessible stalls. Within the study area there are two public parking lots. The city public lot has 69 parking stalls with two accessible stalls and the Moab Information Center (MIC) lot, located at 25 E Center Street, has 38 stalls, two accessible stalls, and five RV stalls. Other private lots evaluated have a total 239 stalls. 9 PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY Methodology To understand existing parking availability as well as parking behavior in Moab, the following data were collected: • Inventory and utilization data for on-street parking • Inventory and utilization data for public parking lots (City Lot, Mic Lot) • Inventory and utilization data for private lots (Canyonlands Inn, Greenwell Inn, McStiff’s Plaza) • Type of parking space by location (accessible, public, and reserved stalls) SAMPLE OF AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH TAKEN DURING OUR DRONE FLIGHTS Data were collected for a weekday and weekend (Friday) for 10 hours throughout the day. To efficiently collect parking data an aerial drone was utilized completing a total 40 flights over the course of two days on Thursday, May 17 and Friday, May 18, 2018. Two flights occurred every hour from 9:00 am to 7:00 pm, gathering data on parking occupancy, frequency, and parking turn over for the entire study area. This resulted in a total of 10,152 aerial photos that were collected and used in the analysis. 10 PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY Peak Parking Days: Daily Approach Volume East/West Streets Since Moab hosts a variety of events throughout the year and experiences seasonal variations in tourism, parking demand can fluctuate by day, month, and season. To identify if the parking data collection occurred during days with high parking demand, the approach volumes to Main Street on 100 South, Center Street, and 100 North were evaluated. These approach volumes are a proxy for parking demand since these streets provide access on street parking and to local businesses and residents. Over the course of a year (August 1, 2017 to July 31, 2018), the daily vehicle approach volumes for downtown Moab were determined using Automated Traffic Signal Performance Measure from the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT). The table below ranks these results in order of highest to lowest daily volumes for the top 20 days of the year. These downtown cross-streets average about 8,200 total daily vehicles with 4,100 vehicles a day on 100 South, 1,400 daily vehicles on Center Street and 2,700 daily vehicles on 100 North. As seen in the table below, the parking data collection occurred during days that had traffic volumes significantly higher than the average daily traffic volume. The data collection on Friday, May 18, 2018 represented 5th highest day and Thursday, May 17, 2018 was 17th highest day of the year. These high volumes on the downtown cross street indicate that the parking data collection occurred during days with higher than average parking demand. Downtown Streets (100 S, Center, 100 N)100 South Center Street 100 North Rank Date Volume Date Volume Date Volume Date Volume 1 4/27/2018 12,278 4/27/2018 5,956 3/16/2018 2,261 4/28/2018 4,535 2 4/28/2018 12,170 5/25/2018 5,827 4/27/2018 2,225 4/27/2018 4,097 3 5/25/2018 11,919 4/5/2018 5,794 5/21/2018 2,166 4/5/2018 4,083 4 4/5/2018 11,888 4/6/2018 5,772 4/28/2018 2,164 3/30/2018 4,006 5 5/18/2018 11,776 5/18/2018 5,771 5/18/2018 2,149 5/4/2018 3,982 6 5/4/2018 11,748 3/29/2018 5,655 5/25/2018 2,136 5/25/2018 3,956 7 4/6/2018 11,695 5/24/2018 5,644 5/7/2018 2,133 3/29/2018 3,937 8 3/29/2018 11,661 5/4/2018 5,634 5/4/2018 2,132 3/28/2018 3,905 9 6/1/2018 11,623 6/1/2018 5,632 6/1/2018 2,130 4/6/2018 3,887 10 3/30/2018 11,608 4/26/2018 5,621 5/14/2018 2,118 4/20/2018 3,867 11 4/26/2018 11,405 3/30/2018 5,565 5/11/2018 2,108 6/1/2018 3,861 12 5/24/2018 11,367 4/2/2018 5,523 5/10/2018 2,100 5/18/2018 3,856 13 4/2/2018 11,337 6/13/2018 5,518 4/2/2018 2,094 4/26/2018 3,840 14 5/11/2018 11,275 4/28/2018 5,471 5/17/2018 2,082 5/2/2018 3,808 15 3/28/2018 11,271 4/3/2018 5,464 5/24/2018 2,070 4/3/2018 3,806 16 4/3/2018 11,216 5/11/2018 5,445 3/29/2018 2,069 4/4/2018 3,802 17 5/17/2018 11,183 5/17/2018 5,426 9/21/2017 2,066 3/23/2018 3,778 18 5/26/2018 11,133 5/26/2018 5,416 9/13/2017 2,056 3/26/2018 3,774 19 4/20/2018 11,090 4/4/2018 5,399 5/31/2018 2,053 10/13/2017 3,764 20 5/7/2018 11,089 4/13/2018 5,398 3/30/2018 2,037 4/12/2018 3,725 Observation Date 5/17/2018 Observation Date 5/18/2018 11 PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY 3. PARKING UTILIZATION Hourly parking utilization was estimated from the parking inventory data and stall occupancy information from the aerial surveys. Individual parking stalls within the study area were identified as occupied or unoccupied for each of the 20 evaluation hours. As shown in the map below, 144 of the 187 public parking stalls evaluated were occupied - a 76% utilization rate for this area (5:00 PM, Thursday, May 17, 2018). For a stall to be identified as occupied, the vehicle must be observed within the stall. For example, the parking stall within the McStiff’s Plaza parking lot with the white SUV either entering or exiting the stall was not identified as occupied. For stalls that were obscured by trees in the overhead mosaic aerial, individual images were reviewed to identify occupancy from different angled images. Map showing sample of occupancy data at 5pm 12 PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY Trends The peak hour of parking demand was Thursday, May 17, 2018 at 6:00 PM with 768 parked vehicles within the study area. The parking stall with the highest turnover was in front of the Moonflower Community Cooperative (39 East 100 North) with 19 unique vehicles in 20 observed hours. While the longest any vehicle was parked was one vehicle that was parked for all 20 observation hours on Williams Way. Similarly, there were 51 stalls that were utilized for all 20 hours but by different vehicles throughout the period. The locations with these high utilization stalls were on Center Street with 19 stalls that were utilized during all 20 observation hours, 100 North with 6 stalls, and Main Street with 5 stalls. There were 162 stalls (11% of parking supply) that never had a parked vehicle during the observation. These unutilized stalls were located away from central downtown core with 34 utilized stalls on 100 North from 100 East to 300 East, 17 stalls by Swanny Park, and 15 stalls on 100 West with the remainder scattered through the study area. Parking stall with the lowest turnover. Parking stall with the highest turnover. 13 PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY Overall Parking & Peak Hour Utilization On Thursday, May 17, 2018, 41% to 53% of all parking spaces were occupied. During the peak hour of 6:00 pm, there were 768 parking spaces occupied. On Friday, May 18, 2018, 35% to 50% of all parking spaces were occupied. During Friday's peak hour of 3:00 pm, there were 735 spaces occupied. 14 PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY Area-Specific Utilization Parking can be difficult to find depending on location, time, and day. One of the necessary elements of this study is to determine the areas of limited parking availability. Generally, parking is efficiently utilized when approximately 85% of spaces are full. Above this level, the parking is functionally full and can frustrate drivers looking for a parking space. However, when parking facilities are below this level they are not functioning efficiently. In this study, limited available parking was identified in areas where utilization was greater than 85%, meaning there were generally one to two available parking spaces per block. The areas that experienced two or more hours of 85% utilization were Main Street, Center Street, 100 North, 100 South, and the MIC parking lot. The map below shows the on-street parking utilization by block for the peak hour of parking. 15 PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY PARKING STALL LOSS Some available on-street parking is lost due to oversized vehicles, vehicles towing trailers, and vehicles parking inefficiently. This loss is most prominent on Main Street where the parallel parking is not delineated, but it also occurs in some of the angled parking where trucks with trailers park along the curb blocking multiple spaces. An example of parking loss on Main Street can be seen in this photograph, where the silver van which is towing a trailer did not leave enough room for a vehicle to park in front of or behind them. This is also an oversized vehicle and it has a trailer. In this case, the vehicle is blocking 3 parking stalls on Main. In reviewing all the observed data, every instance of parking stall lost was documented. Often vehicles would leave a five to ten- foot gap in front of or behind them, allowing only 2 vehicles to park in 3 spaces. The percentage of parking stall loss observed varies by location and time of day, but some was always present. For example, on Thursday May 17th during the noon hour 22 parking spaces (16%) on Main Street were lost due to oversized and inefficiently parked vehicles. If every vehicle was appropriately parked that hour it would make 22 more parking stalls available in the high demand area of Main Street. This parking stall lost can be mitigated be clearly delineating each 20-foot parking stall for parallel parking. Parked vehicles may not always stay within the lines of a single stall, but it will certainly improve the inefficient parking that can be observed now. This was also a recommendation of the Moab Downtown Plan. 16 PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY AREA-SPECIFIC UTILIZATION – MAIN STREET SOUTH OF CENTER STREET There was a high utilization on Main Street south of Center Street, with a limited number of parking stalls. The east side of this area experienced a higher utilization than the west side. For seven hours, the east side was above 85% utilization, followed by two hours at 100% utilization. Up to 25% of available space was lost due to unmarked stalls and/or larger vehicles. On the west side of Main Street, there were four hours where utilization was above 85%, followed by one hour at 100% utilization. In this area, 4% to 20% of available space lost due to unmarked stalls and/or larger vehicles. 17 PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY AREA-SPECIFIC UTILIZATION – MAIN STREET NORTH OF CENTER STREET On Main Street north of Center Street, there were a higher number of stalls and more available parking than on Main Street south of Center Street. In this instance, the west side of Main Street experienced a higher utilization than the east side. The east side was always under 85% utilization, with 2% to 22% of available space lost due to unmarked stalls and/or larger vehicles. On the west side, there were two hours where utilization was above 85%. In this area, 6% to 19% of available space was lost due to unmarked stalls and/or larger vehicles. 18 PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY AREA-SPECIFIC UTILIZATION – CENTER STREET Center Street had the highest utilization. On the east side there were eleven hours above 85% utilization, followed by four hours that were at 84%. The parking on this side was all angled parking, so no parking was lost due to inefficient parking or larger vehicles. On the west side, 15 of the 20 observed hours were above 85% utilization, followed by four hours at 100%. In this area, up to 7% of the available space was lost due to unmarked parallel stalls and/or larger vehicles. 19 PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY AREA-SPECIFIC UTILIZATION – 100 NORTH 100 North had the second highest utilization. On the east side of Main Street, nine hours were above 85% utilization, followed by an hour at 100%. Up to 10% of available space was lost due to unmarked stalls and/or larger vehicles On the west side, four hours were above 85% utilization, followed by one hour at 100%. In this area, up to 13% of the available space was lost due to unmarked parallel stalls and/or larger vehicles. 20 PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY AREA-SPECIFIC UTILIZATION – 100 SOUTH On 100 South, parking was concentrated near Moab Diner (189 S Main Street) and Pancake Haus (196 S Main Street). On the east side of Main Street, one hour was at 84% utilization with no hours above 85%. Up to 4% of available space was lost due to unmarked stalls and/or larger vehicles. On the west side, four hours were above 85% utilization, followed by two hours at 84%. In this area, up to 28% of the available space was lost due to unmarked parallel stalls and/or larger vehicles. 21 PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY AREA-SPECIFIC UTILIZATION – PARKING LOTS Two of the largest parking lots in Moab were evaluated. The city public lot near 100 North and 100 West and the Moab Information Center (MIC) parking lot located at 25 E Center Street. The public lot has an average utilization of 42%, with a maximum utilization of 65% at 6:00 pm Thursday and 2:00 pm Friday. Because all were designated parking stalls, no stalls were lost due to inefficient parking or larger vehicles. Despite the high utilization on west Center Street (see page 16), the utilization decreased significantly in this lot, which is approximately 200-feet away. The MIC parking lot experienced eight hours above 85% utilization. This parking lot has designated parking stalls similar to the public lot. However, about half the cars and trucks in this lot were using designated RV/trailer parking stalls. 22 PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY STALL UTILIZATION Parking utilization was also evaluated for each individual parking stall and is summarized below for the high utilization areas. Maps show stall utilization in terms of percent of observed time the that parking stalls are occupied. Red indicates parking stalls where a vehicle was parked during every observation hour while orange stalls had a parked vehicle during 18 or 19 hours of the 20-hour observation. The map shows the individual stall utilization in the Swanny Park area over time. This area has available parking most of the time. The area with the highest parking utilization is on 400 North in front of the Moab Recreation and Aquatic Center where seven parking spaces had over 85% utilization. The rest of the area around the park has mostly less then 65% utilization meaning that spaces are almost always available. This area has able parking. A couple of homes are Park Avenue seems to have cars parked in front during the hours of observation. SWANNY PARK 23 PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY MAIN STREET NORTH The map shows the individual stall utilization in the North Main Street area over time. This area has a mix of high utilization on the westside of Main Street and lower utilization area along 200 North and the eastside of Main Street. As shown previously, the westside of Main Street has much higher average utilization than the eastside of Main. This is especially true north of 200 North where the businesses on the East side like Wendy’s and the 7-Eleven provide on site parking for their customers. The parking stalls with the highest utilization are the parking stalls in front of the Moab Cliffs and Canyons next to Canyon Voyages. The parking stalls around these businesses averaged over 85% utilization, but around the corner on 200 North there are many parking stalls that average 0%-25% utilization. This means there are sufficient parking spaces available a short distance from all the businesses in this area. 24 PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY DOWNTOWN CORE The map shows the individual stall utilization in the downtown core over time. Over 70% of the stalls on Center Street were occupied for at least 18 hours or 85 % of the time. Of these stalls 19 had a vehicle parked during every hour and 28 had parked vehicles in 18 or 19 hours. Center Street has the most occupied parking. Main Street and 100 North also had parking stalls with high utilization with a total of 29 stalls on Main Street and 18 stalls on 100 North having vehicles parked over 85 % of the time. These higher utilization stalls were generally located on the west side of Main Street and the north side 100 North. Overall, angle parking stalls were utilized more than parallel parking stalls with having a parked vehicle 77% of the time compared to 68% for parallel stalls. While Center Street parking utilization was very high, there were able available parking stalls in the city lot a short walk away. This means that while many spaces are occupied most of the time, there are always a few spaces available in this area and there are likely enough spaces to meet the current parking demand. 25 PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY MAIN STREET SOUTH The map shows the individual stall utilization in the South Main Street area over time. This area has a mix of high utilization throughout with a few spaces of low utilization peppered in. In this area we also documented several of the private parking lots and stalls specifically for the two hotels and the McStiff’s plaza. On-street parking in this area is highly used with dozens of spaces registering over 85% utilization. Even a few spaces on 100 South and 200 South show that level of occupancy, however only 3 spaces south of Center Street show over 95% occupancy. This means that while many spaces are occupied most of the time, there are always a few spaces available in this area and there are likely enough spaces to meet the current parking demand. 26 PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY CITY HALL The map shows the individual stall utilization in the City Hall Area area over time. The parking in front of City Hall as well as the Utah Highway Patrol Office have a medium level of utilization with most spaces averaging between 45% and 85% occupied. This is an ideal level for parking utilization. It also indicates a relatively high turnover. All of these stalls showed some utilization, but none were so busy that there were occupied all the time. Many of the parking spaces on 100 North and several on Center Street saw little to no use with 0%-25% utilization around all the hours of the two days of observation. This means that there is always parking available in this area and the supply seems to be greater than the demand. 27 PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY 400 EAST The map shows the individual stall utilization in the 400 East over time. This area had the least occupied parking of anywhere in the study area. The parking on 400 East was seldom used during observations, with the exception of one vehicle on the westside that was parked there the entire time. 37 out of the 47 counted parking stalls were occupied 0-25% of the time. There was parking available on 400 East every hour of the day. 28 PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY 4. PARKING DURATION Duration Calculation & Method As each space was marked occupied/unoccupied, individual vehicles were identified from the aerial images to determine if it was the same vehicle or a new vehicle in the subsequent hour. This data was used to estimate the number of new vehicles parking each hour as shown (black numbers) in the graph below for Thursday and Friday. The highest number of new vehicles arrived between 12:00-1:00 PM on Thursday (173 newly parked vehicles) and 4:00-5:00 PM on Friday (178 newly parked vehicles). Vehicle turnover shows similar patterns both days with peaks in newly parked vehicles around lunch and again at 5:00 PM. The number of vehicles leaving (dashed lines) increases through the day peaking at 4:00 PM on Thursday with 160 vehicles, and on Friday at 3:00 PM with 181 vehicles leaving during these hours. Thursday Vehicle Turnover - Newly Parked Vehicles by Area & Total Leaving by hour 200 100 116 102 147 130 159 150 172 167 126 126 129 173 155 141 160 159 154 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 AM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 New Vehicles / Leaving Vehicles from Prior HourLeaving Vehicles New Vehicles ## Friday Vehicle Turnover - Newly Parked Vehicles by Area & Total Leaving by hour 200 94 119 133 144 157 164 149 178 127145136 167 150 160 181 174 167 133 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 AM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 New Vehicles / Leaving Vehicles from Prior HourLeaving Vehicles New Vehicles ## 29 PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY Parking Duration by Area Based upon data from the vehicle turnover, the estimated overall parking duration in downtown Moab is 2.4 hours and city wide it is 2.6 hours. As seen in the table below, the downtown streets generally have lower parking durations than the city as a whole. The lowest average parking duration was 1.6 hours on Main Street south of Center Street. Average time a vehicle is parked in a typical parking spot in downtown Moab Location 2.6 hours City Average 1.6 hours Main St., South of Center - East Side 1.6 hours Main St., South of Center - West Side 2.9 hours Main St., North of Center - West Side 2.1 hours Main St., North of Center - East Side 2.2 hours Center St. - East of Main Street 2.7 hours Center St. - West of Main Street 2.5 hours 100 North - East of Main St. 1.8 hours 100 North - West of Main St. 2.7 hours 100 South - East of Main St. 1.6 hours 100 South - West of Main St. 2.6 hours MIC Parking Lot 2.6 hours Public Lot One observation to note is that the highest utilized areas or areas of highest demand on Main Street north of Center and Center Street west of Main have average parking durations of 2.9 hours and 2.7 hours respectively. Because parking in these areas is limited and in high demand reducing the duration and increasing the vehicle turnover would allow for more vehicles to park there throughout the day. If the parking duration was shorted to under 2 hours the spaces would likely be able to used by 6 or 7 vehicles per day instead of 4 or 5. Therefore it is recommended to simply post 2 hour parking limit signs throughout the downtown parking area. This doesn’t need to be enforced the signing alone will reduce the parking duration and many of the drivers parking their vehicles will be compliant with the signs. 30 PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY 5. PARKING DEMAND Parking demand is different than the observed parking utilization analysis the report has included to this point. Parking Demand is a calculated value of the amount of parking expected for different land uses. For example, a restaurant will expect to have different parking demand than a retail shop and the expected parking demand would occur at different times of day. Similarly a residential house, a post office, coffee shop, hotel, all have different expected parking demand. Analysis Area The parking demand analysis area is within this project's study area (see map below). This includes Downtown Moab, 100 West to 100 East, 300 South to 400 North, Swanny Park, and County Court blocks. Methodology The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Parking Generation Manual (4th Edition) is the industry standard to estimate parking demand. The ITE standards are based on national data and generally reflect isolated, suburban sites. As a result, ITE data should be used for informational purposes only but can establish a starting point to understand potential parking demand. A typical analysis takes the size of the development and multiples it with a “standard” peak parking generation rate - for example, 10.6 spaces per 1,000 square feet of a sit-down restaurant or 0.89 spaces per occupied hotel room. For this analysis, each parcel within the study area commercial, residential or institutional land uses were identified along with the square feet of structure or number of units. This information was used to estimate parking demand within the study area. To compare the ITE calculated parking demand to parking supply, the number of parking spaces within private lots (For example, the Wendy's parking lot, USFS parking lot, private driveways, etc., that were not included in the utilization analysis) was also required. Since ITE parking demand generally represents demand at isolated suburban sites, an important concept is multi-stop trips. Multi-stop trips are where a vehicle is parked in one space and a person or group makes multiple trips to several land uses. In Moab, a multi-stop trip would consist of parking to go to dinner then walking to one or more stores along Main Street or parking at the hotel then going to a restaurant without moving your vehicle. 31 PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY To account for multi-stop trips within the demand analysis, the parking utilization data for a two-block area from 100 West to Main Street and 100 South to 100 North were compared to the estimated ITE parking demand. These two blocks had the most robust data from the utilization analysis with most parking stalls included in the analysis while other blocks in the study area had many private parking lots that were not evaluated. Within these blocks, parking utilization was found to be only 48% of the ITE predicted demand on weekdays and 38% on weekends. This translates to people making 2.08 trips each time they park their vehicle on a weekday and 2.6 trips on weekends. Instead of using these direct estimates to adjust the ITE predicted demand to match conditions for downtown Moab, a more conservative estimate of 1.67 multi-stop trips was assumed. The 1.67 multi-stop trips adjustment translates 60% of the predicted ITE demand for isolated suburban sites and is higher than both the weekday and weekend estimate for the two-block area. By using this more conservative adjustment, predicted demand is higher and helps identify areas where near-term parking demand may exceed supply. Parking Demand Over Time Predicted peak demand is at 1:00 pm on both weekdays and weekends, with 1,289 spaces on the weekdays, and 1,382 spaces on the weekends as illustrated below. While localized demand is over 85% for both weekdays and weekends as discussed in Area-Specific Utilization, there are more than 1,000 empty parking spaces among all public and private lots within study area during peak demand. 32 PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY Parking Demand – Weekday On weekdays parking demand was generally less than 85% occupied. However, between 10:00 am and 1:00 pm the block of Center Street to 100 North and Main Street to 100 East had greater than 85% occupancy during that same time because of the proximity of the U.S. Post Office (50 East 100 North) that has very high parking rate. 33 PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY Parking Demand – Weekend On the weekend between noon and 5:00 pm, parking demand on the blocks west of Main Street from 100 South to 100 North (shown in red) was generally greater than 85% occupied. This high parking demand was driven by restaurants and retail uses. 34 PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY Observed Utilization vs. Predicted Demand The daily utilization and predicted demand for the study area are summarized below. Generally, utilization and demand are similar with 40% to 50% of parking utilized and predicted to be occupied throughout the day. However, predicted demand does have a mid-day peak that was not observed in the parking utilization possibly due to the higher multi-stop trip percentage identified within the two-block area. Regardless these two analyses validate each other. We can feel confident in the observed parking utilization because people’s parking behavior was very similar to what the predicted demand would expect. 35 PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY Observed Utilization vs. Predicted Demand - By Location As shown below, utilization and predicted demand have similar spatial distributions. During the weekend peak hour there is high utilization and limited available parking from 100 South to 100 North and 100 West to Main Street. This matches the predicted demand that shows these areas with 95% plus of parking spaces occupied. In addition to these areas Center Street as well as adjacent blocks Main Street and 100 North are above or approaching 85% occupancy indicating limited parking in these locations. 36 PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY 6. PARKING RECOMMENDATIONS Conclusions Before listing specific recommendations, below are some general observations and parking conclusions: • There is ample parking available in the study area for the needs of all land uses and the desires of all drivers to park vehicles • The goal for parking areas should be achieve 85% utilization, most areas never reach that number (green and yellow areas on the maps) indicating an excess supply • Some Main Street Shoulder parking is lost due to vehicles with trailers and inefficient spacing • Restaurants generate the highest public parking demand on Moab • Peak demand hours are 1 PM and 6 PM • There are few localized areas (like Center Street between Main and 100 West) where parking demand exceeds parking supply • People seem unwilling to walk greater than 300 feet from their vehicle to their destination as witnessed by the available parking in the highest demand hours • In many cases vehicles park on average for over 2 hours at a time • People may be unaware of available parking in the city owned lot and other areas Moab is in a good position with more total parking available than is needed to meet the demand. However, during the highest demand hours of the day parking immediately adjacent to some destinations will not be available. That means that anecdotally, if you are going out to dinner at Pasta Jay’s or The Spoke, then you won’t be able to find parking by the restaurant. This may be frustrating, and you may think, “There is not enough parking in Moab.” However, at that same time you will be able to find plenty of parking on 100 West and you can simply walk the block or block and a half to the restaurant.Pasta Jay's Restaurant (4 N. Main Street) 37 PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY Recommendations While there is sufficient parking available in the study area there are still several things that Moab can do to enhance parking and increase efficiency of parking utilization. These recommendations are applicable citywide however Moab would likely see the biggest benefit by applying them in the downtown area. Project Why Benefit Cost Continue with FREE parking The demand does not seem high enough to begin to charge and there is no appetite for paid parking from businesses or residents Keep the same number of stalls, businesses and drivers agree None. No cost needed for meter monitoring & collection of parking fees Public parking sign with a 2-hour time limit Increase the vehicle turn-over in public parking spaces More drivers will be able to park downtown in the most desired places $100-300 per installed sign Add parking signs to encourage parking in the city owned lot and available spaces Increase the parking utilization of some of the lesser used spaces Drivers will likely be able to find parking quicker during peak times $100-300 per installed sign Add red curb paint to restrict parking within 30 feet of an intersection Utah State Code restricts parking within 30 feet of point to curb (Utah Code 41-6a-1401). Improves sight distances for drivers and pedestrians at intersections. $20-$40 per painted curb Back-in angle parking on roads with planned bike lanes Safer bicycle and pedestrian access on roads like 100 North and 100 South Reduced bicycle crashes and increased pedestrian safety $10-$20 per line Delineate specific parking stalls for the parallel parking Downtown especially on Main Street This will decrease the amount of parking lost to bad parking gaps and increase efficiency More drivers will be able to park on Main Street $7-$15 per line Continue forward with the plan to add a parking garage on the current city lot That is the best location for additional parking as the most occupied parking in on Center Street west of Main Street, plus the State of Utah is providing funds for its construction Adds 200+ new parking stalls in the highest demand area of Downtown Moab $7.5 million but funded through the State of Utah’s Hotspot funding Continue forward with the plan to add over- sized parking lots north and south of Moab Drivers will be able to drop off trailers or consolidate vehicles Fewer large trailers taking up parking spaces Unknown Add wayfinding signs to encourage walking to destinations 1-2 blocks away. Increase the parking utilization of some of the lesser used spaces Parking would improve system wide if there was a bit more distribution $100-300 per installed sign Several of these recommendations are already underway with the city pursuing State funding for the new parking garage. The other recommendations are all low cost, just the expense of signing or striping. Moab City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: May 14, 2019 Title: Ordinance 2019-02: Amending the City of Moab Municipal Code by Adding a New Chapter 17.68 Planned Affordable Development (PAD) Date Submitted: May 8, 2019 Presenters: TBD Attachment(s): -Ordinance 2019-02 (Clean) -Ordinance 2019-02 (Legislative) Suggested Motion: I move to adopt Ordinance 2019-02, Amending the City of Moab Municipal Code by Adding a New Chapter 17.68 Planned Affordable Development (PAD). Background/Summary: This latest iteration of the PAD incorporates all of the changes requested by the Council and a couple of clarifications recommended by staff. Syntax and formatting changes were also modified where necessary. In summary, the following major changes were made: The MH RV-1 zone was omitted from the ordinance; The C-3 zone was added, with housing to be on second floors or higher; Minimum unit size is 275 square feet; 30% of PAD units are to be market rate (in developments of up to five units no more than one can be market rate); There is a rounding provision for when fractions of units would result from any percentage requirement; PAD units to have a maximum of three bedrooms; Parking is one space for a one bedroom, and two spaces for two bedroom or larger units; All PAD units cannot be used as overnight lodging; Eligibility was expanded to include parents with at least one minor child; Subleasing of units must be to eligible persons; All PAD units to be the sole place of residence of the occupant (including market rate); and Appreciation for PAD sales units is no more than three percent per annum. One other change was the simplification of the decision matrix in section 080 to omit details regarding amended plats. As discussed recently in other contexts, state law has detailed provisions specifying the process for modifying a plat, and staff felt that it was better to provide that the City will follow state law, rather than trying to reconcile all of those detailed provisions in the ordinance. #### 1 CITY OF MOAB ORDINANCE 2019-02 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY OF MOAB MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 17.68 PLANNED AFFORDABLE DEVELOPMENT (PAD) The following findings describe the intent and purpose of this ordinance: a.The City has enacted Title 17.00, Zoning, of the Moab Municipal Code, which governs land use and development within the City Limits. b.From time to time the City undertakes to revise its zoning ordinances to improve the quality of land development and align the Code with state law and contemporary planning concepts. c.The City has also adopted a Moderate-Income Housing Plan and is in the process of reviewing barriers to the construction of housing in the community. d.The Council is in support of eliminating barriers to increase the inventory of workforce housing. e.The City Council adopted the Moab Area Affordable Housing Plan as an addendum to the City of Moab General Plan on January 8, 2017. f.Housing stock in Moab is being consumed by second homes and tourism related lodging. Persons employed in tourism and lodging-related occupations are unable to afford housing given current wage and housing trends. g.Concurrently, the cost of housing has become increasingly unaffordable, with a median home price of $325,000.00, as compared to annual household median income of $52,000. h.The lack of affordable housing can result in crowding, undesirable living conditions, and a decrease in the quality of life for Moab workers and their families. i.The City has committed to encouraging the development of affordable housing opportunities by creating the Planned Affordable Development (PAD). j.The City finds that there is a public need to adopt this ordinance because market conditions are not supplying the needed numbers of affordable housing units for Moab residents. The City finds that it must undertake creative mechanisms to encourage the development of affordable housing. k.The approval of PAD housing subject to affordability controls is in the public interest and within the legitimate police powers of the City. Now therefore, the City of Moab enacts the following amendments to the Moab Municipal Code. 2 Chapter 17.68 PLANNED AFFORDABLE DEVELOPMENT Sections: 17.68.010 Purpose 17.68.020 Definitions 17.68.030 Permitted Locations and Housing Types 17.68.040 Minimum Project Area and Subdivision Lot Sizes 17.68.050 Performance Standards 17.68.060 Application Review Procedures 17.68.070 Submittal Requirements 17.68.080 Miscellaneous Provisions 17.68.090 Appeal Procedures 17.68.100 Development Improvements Agreement 17.68.110 Affordability Controls 17.68.120 Land Use Restriction Agreement and Covenants 17.68.130 Impact Fees 17.68.140 Enforcement 17.68.150 Interpretation 17.68.160 Implementation 17.68.10 Purpose A.The purpose of this Chapter is to allow Planned Affordable Developments (PAD) that provide incentives for the development of affordable housing. To qualify, PAD affordable housing units are subject to deed restrictions that preserve the affordability of the units for a period of not less than fifty (50) years. The affordability controls provided in this Chapter are voluntary, entered into by contract between the City and the applicant in exchange for the zoning concessions authorized herein. B.As applicable to PAD developments, the provisions of this Chapter supersede any conflicting or inconsistent provisions which may be found elsewhere in the Moab Municipal Code. 17.68.020 Definitions The following definitions apply to this Chapter: 1.“Adjacent” means a parcel of land that shares a boundary with the parcel of real property included in an application under this Chapter. 2.“Advisory Documents” means planning documents adopted by the City from time to time, including: the Moab General Plan; Storm Water Management Master Plan; Sanitary Sewer Master Plan; Water Storage Distribution Master Plan; Natural Hazards Pre-disaster Master Plan; or similarly adopted planning documents. 3 3.“Affordable Housing” or “Affordable Units” means housing developed pursuant to this Chapter in which the sales price of the unit, or the rental rate for each unit, does not exceed the sums deemed affordable to individuals and families with annual incomes of one hundred percent (100%) or less of Grand County Area Median Income (AMI), as determined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the requirements of this Chapter. Affordable housing is further defined by the following income subcategories: a.“Moderate Income” means household income which is between eighty percent (80%) and one hundred percent (100%) of Grand County Area Median Income as defined by HUD. b.“Low Income” means household income which is between sixty percent (60%) and seventy nine percent (79%) of Grand County Area Median Income. c.“Very Low Income” means household income which is between thirty percent (30%) and fifty nine percent (59%) of Grand County Area Median Income. d.“Extremely Low Income” means household income which is below thirty percent (30%) of the Grand County Area Median Income. 4.“Area Median Income (AMI)” means the published estimate of median income in Grand County that is determined periodically by HUD, as adjusted for household size. 5.“Development” means new construction or remodeling of buildings or real property. 6.“Development Review Team (DRT)” means the committee of City employees including the Planning Director, Public Works Director, Building Official, and such other persons as may be designated by the City from time to time. 7.“Developer” means a person offering affordable housing units developed pursuant to this Chapter for lease or rent to Eligible Persons. 8.“Development Improvements Agreement (DIA)” means a written agreement between an applicant for a Planned Affordable Development and the City of Moab containing specific requirements to ensure the construction of specified public or private improvements, the phasing of construction, and security to ensure completion of improvements as a condition for Final Plat/Plan approval. 9.“Eligible Persons” means those persons authorized to occupy PAD affordable housing units, as further defined in Section 17.68.110, below. 10.“Final Approval” means the approval, with or without conditions, given by the City Council, providing the necessary authority for an applicant to: a) in the case of a PAD 4 subdivision, record the Final Plat and convey subdivision lots; or b) in the case of a PAD rental development, proceed with development of rental units. 11.“Final Plat” means a map of a subdivision under this Chapter which has been surveyed by a licensed professional land surveyor and acknowledged by the owner, and which accurately depicts streets, alleys, easements, blocks, lots, survey monuments, public/private improvements, and other attributes of a PAD subdivision. 12.“Final Site Plan” means a map of a rental development under this Chapter which has been surveyed by a licensed professional land surveyor and acknowledged by the owner, and which accurately depicts streets, alleys, easements, blocks, lots, survey monuments, building envelopes, public/private improvements, and other attributes of a PAD rental development. 13.“Habitable Room” means a heated room in a dwelling that is intended for human occupation. Habitable rooms do not include bathrooms, closets, storage rooms, utility spaces, or the like. 14.“Household” means a person living alone, or two or more persons, whether related by blood or marriage or not, who reside together in a single dwelling unit. 15.“HUD” means the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. 16.“Land Use Restriction Agreement (LURA)” means a contract between the City of Moab and an affordable housing Developer or Subdivider that is recorded as an encumbrance upon the real property to be developed, and that provides for continued enforcement of the affordability provisions and other requirements of this Chapter for a duration of not less than (50) years. A LURA shall run with the land and be binding upon the parties and their successors in title, as provided by its terms. 17.“Lot” means a tract of land defined in an approved plat which is developed for housing and which may be conveyed to a buyer by deed. 18.“Market Rate” means a housing unit offered for sale or lease that is not subject to limitations as to sales price or rental rates otherwise applicable to affordable units under this Chapter. 19.“Monitoring Agency” means the City of Moab, or its designee, charged with monitoring and/or enforcement of the affordability controls or development approval conditions for housing developed pursuant to this Chapter, including LURA provisions. 20.“Original Purchase Price” means the actual sales price for affordable housing units developed under this Chapter calculated as follows: principal, interest, taxes, and insurance (PITI) on the unit shall not exceed thirty percent (30%) of the Grand County AMI for a household of four (4) divided by twelve (12) months. Assumptions used to calculate the OPP shall be i) a five (5) percent down payment; ii) a thirty (30) year 5 mortgage term; and iii) a mortgage rate equal to the prevailing First Home rate, or its equivalent, of the Utah Housing Corporation (or similar agency). 21.“Overnight Accommodations” means short-term rental housing provided to short-term tenants for a period of thirty (30) consecutive days or less. 22.“Public Dedication” means streets, sidewalks, parks, open space, trails, or other areas of land or improvements to be dedicated to public use under this Chapter. 23.“Preliminary Plan” means a map of a rental development proposed under this Chapter which has been surveyed by a licensed professional land surveyor and acknowledged or authorized by the owner, and which accurately depicts streets, alleys, easements, blocks, lots, survey monuments, building envelopes, public/private improvements, utilities, and other attributes of a proposed PAD rental development. The Preliminary Plan shall include such other submittals as to planned improvements as are required by this Chapter. 24.“Preliminary Plat” means a map of a subdivision development proposed under this Chapter which has been surveyed by a licensed professional land surveyor and acknowledged or authorized by the owner, and which accurately depicts streets, alleys, easements, blocks, lots, survey monuments, building envelopes, public/private improvements, utilities, and other attributes of a proposed PAD subdivision. The Preliminary Plat shall include such other submittals as to planned improvements as are required by this Chapter. 25.“Preliminary Approval” means an approval, with or without conditions, given by the land use authority that provides the necessary authority for an applicant to proceed with the preparation of the Final Plat or the Final Plan. 26.“Project Area” means a defined tract of land, including all subsequent development phases, that is proposed for a PAD development application. 27. “Setback” means the minimum distance from a specified boundary that a structure or other feature must be located. 28.“Subdivider” means any person creating a subdivision pursuant to this Chapter and offering affordable housing units or lots for sale to eligible persons. 29.“Subdivision” means a described tract of land that has been surveyed by a licensed professional land surveyor and acknowledged or authorized by the owner, that describes two or more lots which may be conveyed to buyers, and that accurately depicts streets, alleys, easements, blocks, lots, survey monuments, and other attributes of a proposed PAD subdivision development. 30.“Site Plan” means a described tract of land proposed for rental development under this Chapter which has been surveyed by a licensed professional land surveyor and acknowledged or authorized by the owner, and which accurately depicts streets, alleys, 6 easements, blocks, lots, survey monuments, building envelopes, public/private improvements, utilities, and other attributes of a proposed PAD rental development. 31.“Unit” means a residential dwelling containing, at minimum, a permanently installed kitchen (including, a sink, stove, refrigerator, counters, and cabinets), bathroom (sink, toilet, and a shower or bathtub), bedroom (or sleeping area), living room (or area), parking, and storage space. All habitable rooms shall be separate from the bathroom(s). A residential unit may contain more than one bedroom, depending upon the needs of the development. Each housing unit shall have non-exclusive access to common elements within the particular development. 17.68.030 Permitted Locations and Housing Types A.Subject to the provisions of this Chapter, Planned Affordable Developments shall be allowed in the following zoning districts: 1.Residential Zones: R-3, R-4 zones; 2.Commercial Zones: C-1, C-2, C-3, C-4, and C-5 zones. B.Housing types for a PAD development shall conform to the types permitted in the underlying zoning district and the other provisions of this Chapter. All PAD units constructed in the C-3 zoning district shall be located on the second or higher floors of each building. 17.68.040 Minimum Project Area; Subdivision Lot Sizes A.Provided that all requirements of this Chapter can be met, there is no minimum project area required for a PAD development. B.Provided that all requirements of this Chapter can be met, there is no minimum lot size for lots within a PAD subdivision. 17.68.050 Performance Standards A.Affordability Concept. Applicants are encouraged to include a mix of one bedroom (or studio), two-bedroom, or three-bedroom units. PAD units shall have a maximum of three (3) bedrooms. The application shall demonstrate that the units for sale or rent qualify as affordable housing, as defined by this Chapter. Units developed under this Chapter (including affordable and market-rate units) shall not be used or offered as overnight accommodations. Where an application includes phased development, affordable units shall be constructed as part of each phase with not less than the minimum required ratio of market rate and affordable units in each phase. B.Market Rate Limits and Income Tiers. For PAD developments proposing up to five (5) units in a project area the number of market rate units shall not exceed one (1). In all other PAD developments the percentage of market rate units shall not exceed thirty percent (30%) 7 of the total number of units. Applicants are encouraged to provide a mix of units that are affordable to moderate-income, low-income, very-low- income, and extremely-low-income households. Where the percentage of any required type of unit in a PAD development, as applied to the total number of units, results in decimal of .5 or higher, the number of required units of a particular type shall be rounded upward. C.Minimum Unit Sizes. All housing units developed under this Chapter shall contain, at minimum: a permanently installed kitchen (including, at minimum, a sink, stove, refrigerator, counters and cabinets); bathroom (including a sink, toilet, shower [or bathtub]); bedroom (or sleeping area); living area; parking; and storage space. Housing units may contain multiple bedrooms or other functional spaces as needed. The minimum total area of the habitable rooms of PAD units (excluding closets, storage spaces, bathrooms, and utility spaces) shall be not less than two hundred seventy-five (275) square feet, measured from the interior of the unit. All housing units, and all habitable rooms within those units, shall comply with applicable building code minimum requirements, including the International Residential Code, as adopted by the State of Utah. D.Height of structures. The maximum building height of all buildings in a PAD development shall be as follows: Building height shall be measured from the average finished grade of the building to the midpoint of the highest plane of the roof. E.Setbacks; Adjacent Solar Access. Except as necessary to preserve solar access, the front, back, and side setbacks of a PAD development relative to other properties shall be provided by the underlying zoning district. PAD developments may be required to provide additional setbacks where necessary to provide adequate solar access to adjacent properties located immediately to the north of the project boundary. F.Open space/Common Facilities. PAD rental developments shall include open space for residents consistent with the size and scope of the project area. Open space, such as landscaping, recreation areas, entryways, commons spaces, bicycle racks, and setback areas shall comprise not less than five percent (5%) of the project area. Required parking spaces, stairways, elevators, and hallways shall not be calculated as open space. PAD subdivisions are not subject to the five percent requirement of this Subsection (F). G.Stormwater. Projects shall include engineered plans for the detention and conveyance of reasonably anticipated storm-water attributable to the project. Storm-water conveyances shall not connect to sanitary sewers. 8 H.Sidewalks/trails. PAD developments shall incorporate elements to facilitate pedestrian and bicycle access. Sidewalks are required along at least one side of all public street frontages. Trails may be required to connect to existing or planned trail systems or public streets. I.Parking. Vehicle parking shall be provided for all PAD developments at a rate of not less than one (1) off-street space per one-bedroom unit and a maximum of two (2) off-street parking spaces for each two-bedroom or larger unit. Wherever possible, parking areas shall be located within the perimeter of the building envelope. Hard-scape semi-permeable materials may be used for parking spaces. J.Lighting. Adequate lighting must be provided for public spaces and common areas. Light fixtures shall consist of a full cutoff, fully shielded, downward directed fixture. Wall mounted flood lights that direct outward toward other properties and roadways are prohibited. K.Manufactured housing. All manufactured housing to be utilized in developments under this Chapter shall comply with all other provisions of the building code. L.Culinary Water/Wastewater. All housing units shall be served by municipal culinary water and wastewater service. Fire flows shall be provided and hydrants installed in conformity with building codes and fire department requirements. M.Streets. Developments shall provide adequate public street access to each dwelling. All streets within an application shall be hard surfaced or paved and constructed in conformity with City design specifications, as determined by staff. Streets shall include concrete curb, gutter, and sidewalk, and be configured to allow adequate vehicle and emergency access. Streets shall be designed to promote efficient circulation and connectivity to other parcels and the remainder of the City street system. Street signage must be installed consistent with staff requirements. N.Utilities. Applications must include a utility plan showing feasibility and placement of electrical, telephone, cable, and internet services. O.Site Specific Elements or Standards. Depending on the scope of the project area, the City may require that site-specific design elements or standards be incorporated into an application as needed to address public safety, recreation, construction requirements, access, connectivity, or future phases of development. P.Storage. Each dwelling unit shall be provided with a separate, covered lockable storage space that is at least large enough to store as many adult bicycles as there are bedrooms in the unit. Q.Advisory Document Consistency. All applications shall demonstrate substantial consistency with Advisory Documents. The land use authority may deviate from Advisory Documents on a case by case basis upon a showing of good cause. 9 R.Lot Sales with Finished Dwellings. PAD subdivisions shall include the sale of an affordable housing unit together with the sale of a lot, unless exempted by the terms of a development agreement. 17.68.060 Application Review Procedures A.General Procedures PAD applicants shall comply with the following review procedures. 1.Pre-application Meeting. A pre-application conference shall be held with planning staff to discuss the proposed development concept, likely development issues, and the requirements of this Chapter. 2.Application Submittal/Completeness Review. Upon submittal of an application and payment of the required fees, City Staff will review the application to determine if it includes, in form adequate for substantive review, all of the submittal materials required by this Chapter. If an application is found to be deficient, City staff will notify the applicant of the deficiency in writing. 3.Staff Review. In every case the application will be reviewed by the DRT and review agencies. The DRT may require that the applicant correct errors or incorporate design changes consistent with applicable codes, design standards, and/or review criteria. Where an application is substantially incomplete or grossly deficient, the staff may notify the applicant in writing that the application will not be subject to further review until such time as the enumerated defects are cured. 4.Planning Commission Review. Preliminary Plat or Preliminary Site Plans that have completed Staff review will be forwarded to the Planning Commission with a staff recommendation. The Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing to review the application and receive public comment, and it may: a) approve the application; b) deny the application; c) approve the application subject to conditions; or d) table the application pending receipt of additional information. a.At preliminary plat/plan review the applicant shall demonstrate that the plat or plan meets all submittal and performance criteria. Final construction drawings are not required, but all submittals must demonstrate the feasibility of the final design and conformity with this Chapter, applicable codes, and design standards. 5.Final Plat/Final Site Plan Review Procedures. When an applicant is ready to request Final Site Plan or Final Plat approval a Final Plat or Site Plan shall be submitted for review by Staff. Staff will review the design documents for completeness and verify that they incorporate changes or conditions required at the preliminary approval stage. Additionally, all related documents and agreements, including a Subdivision Improvements and Phasing Agreement, Land Use Restriction Agreement, and Covenants, 10 Conditions & Restrictions (if applicable), and final construction drawings shall be reviewed and in final form prior to submittal to the City Council for final approval. a.Final approval shall be in the form of an ordinance adopted by the City Council incorporating all the design drawings, the Final Plat or Final Plan, the conditions, and all development agreements comprising the PAD. Final approval is a legislative decision of the City and constitutes a site-specific development plan for all lands included in the project area. 17.68.070 Submittal Requirements A.A PAD application must be submitted to the Planning Department on the approved application form, together with the required review fee. The application must be signed by the record property owner or, if the applicant is not the owner, the applicant must deliver proof of approval signed by the owner. Components of the application submittal may contain multiple plan sets or reports, provided, that they are clear, legible, and successfully demonstrate the purposes required under this Chapter. Unless waived by the Planning Director, the application must include four copies and electronic PDF copies of all design drawings and submittals. B.PAD applications shall conform to the submittal requirements of Chapter 17.67, Site Plan Review, except that site plan submittal requirements are waived for development of up to six (6) dwelling units. Developments subject to this subsection (B) shall submit all required building permit submittals with the application, and City staff may require supplementation of submittals to assure compliance with this Chapter. Subdivision Developments subject to this subsection (B) shall also submit a proposed Final Plat for review and approval. C.Additional Submittals--Waiver of Certain Submittals. The Planning Director has discretion to require other submittals where appropriate for the review of a particular application. Alternatively, the Planning Director has discretion to waive or modify any requirement for a particular submittal if it is determined that the document or report is not necessary, or if an alternate submittal is justified for the review of a particular application. Any waiver shall be in writing labeled as a submittal waiver, shall identify the project by name and application number, and shall be signed and dated by the Planning Director. D.Conformity with Submittal Standards. All submittals must conform to the land use submittal standards adopted by the City. Submittals which do not clearly or accurately depict elements required for review of the project may be rejected, or staff may require revisions during the review process. E.Affordable Housing Development Plan. The Affordable Housing Development Plan shall contain, at a minimum, the following information: 1.A general description of the development, including whether the development will contain units for rent or sale; 11 2.The total number of market-rate units and affordable housing units (with descriptions of the income subcategories) and a depiction of where those units will be situated on the plat/plan; 3.The square footage of each market-rate unit and of each affordable unit measured from the interior walls of the unit; 4.The estimated sale price or monthly rent for each market-rate unit or lot and each affordable housing unit; 5.If construction of dwelling units is to be phased, a phasing plan stating the number of market-rate and affordable housing units in each phase; and 6.Statistical information as to the project area, developed area square footage, open space area, number of parking spaces, and the like shall be included. 7.Affordability calculations and assumptions demonstrating that the housing will be affordable under current economic conditions. F.Departmental Standards. All developments pursuant to this Chapter shall comply with departmental standards published by the City. 17.68.080 Miscellaneous Provisions A.Variances--Exceptional Conditions. In cases where unusual topographic or other exceptional conditions would pose a hardship on the applicant, variances from the strict requirements of this Chapter may be made by the Appeal Authority prior to Final Plat/Plan review. Staff shall provide a recommendation with respect to the proposed variance. The Appeal Authority may grant a variance, provided that it will not result in substantial detriment to the public good and will not substantially impair the intent and purpose of this Chapter. B.Accessory Dwelling Units Prohibited. Accessory dwelling units, as defined in the Moab Municipal Code, are not permitted within a PAD development. C.Vacating or Changing a Subdivision Plat. Any proposed vacation, alteration, change, or amendment to an approved PAD plat must be reviewed in conformity with the procedures and standards applicable under Utah law. An amendment that would violate one or more provisions of this Chapter or applicable development approvals may be grounds for denial. 12 D.Decision Matrix. Decisions under this Chapter shall be made by the following: Application/Action Advisory Body Land Use Authority Appeal Body Required Public Hearing Prelim. Plat/ Prelim. Site Plan City Staff Planning Commission AA**Yes, (PC) Final Plat/Site Plan City Staff City Council District Court No **AA means the Appeal Authority, as specified in MMC 17.72.120 E.Proof of Service Availability for Non-City Authorities. Where the City is not able to provide culinary water or wastewater service to a proposed development, the applicant will be required to provide a current letter from the water or wastewater service provider demonstrating that water and wastewater service is available to the subject site. 17.68.090 Appeal Procedures A.Any person adversely affected by a preliminary land use decision, including a decision by the Planning Commission approving or denying a preliminary Plat or Plan, may appeal that decision to the Appeal Authority, and the appeal shall be governed by the procedures in MMC § 17.72.120 through 170. B.Any person adversely affected by a final land use decision of the City Council under this Chapter may appeal that decision by filing an action in the District Court for Grand County, Utah. C.Exhaustion of all administrative remedies shall be required prior to any applicant seeking judicial review of any final decision pursuant to this Chapter. Failure to exhaust administrative remedies shall result in the action or suit being dismissed. D.A judicial action seeking review or appeal of a final decision or action under this Chapter must be filed no later than thirty (30) calendar days from the date of the decision or order that is the subject of the appeal. E.Upon the commencement of a judicial appeal challenging any decision under this Chapter, the City shall promptly transmit to the district court true and correct copies of all submittals, testimony, orders, and file documents comprising the record pertaining to the application, including any transcripts or tape recordings of proceedings. F.There shall be no judicial review of legal claims or points of error which are not first presented for review or decision to the land use authority. G.In any review pursuant to this Chapter (whether administrative or judicial), the reviewing body shall presume the decision made under this Chapter is valid. A final decision of the City Council shall be affirmed if it is found to be within the scope of legislative discretion. 13 H.Disputes concerning or arising from the administration of this Chapter after final land use approval, including but not limited to enforcement of the Land Use Restriction Agreement, affordability controls of this Chapter, or the like, shall be heard by the District Court for Grand County, Utah. 17.68.100 Development Improvements Agreement A.The Development Improvements Agreement (DIA) shall be approved by the City Council at the time of approval of the Final Plat or Final Site Plan. A DIA between the City and the applicant is required to specify the overall development plan in writing and is a condition precedent to the commencement of construction. The DIA shall set forth the commitments and obligations of the City of Moab and the applicant, including, as necessary, a financial assurance for required public improvements, the applicant’s phasing plan, and other details particular to the development. The DIA shall be subject to review and approval by the City Council and must be consistent with all prior approval conditions applicable to the approved plan. B.The DIA may require that an applicant provide a performance bond, letter of credit, or other financial assurance to secure completion of required improvements, and/or as a condition for Final Plat or Final Site Plan approval. The financial assurance shall be provided in an amount equal to one hundred fifty percent (150%) of the estimated cost of all required public improvements, including: landscaping; road improvements; pedestrian ways, trails, sidewalks, curbs, and gutters; street lighting and signage; culinary water lines and fire hydrants; wastewater lines and wastewater disposal facilities; and storm-water improvements. City staff shall verify the correct amount of the financial assurance based upon review of the cost of the required improvements. Not more than ten percent (10%) of the financial assurance may be held to secure any warranty claims, as provided in the DIA. C.With respect to a PAD subdivision, no final plat for the subdivision, or any phase thereof, and no building permit for construction upon any lot within the subdivision shall be executed by the City until such time as either: 1) all public improvements are completed in accordance with the DIA and accepted by the City; or 2) a financial assurance as required by this Chapter is provided to the City. A Subdivider or owner shall not convey or attempt to convey any lot prior to the recording of the final plat, and any purported conveyance in violation of this subsection shall be void. D.With respect to a PAD rental development, no final site plan for the development, or any phase thereof, and no building permit for construction of housing units within the development, shall be executed by the City until such time as either: 1) all public improvements are completed in accordance with the DIA; or 2) a financial assurance as required by this Chapter is provided to the City. A Developer or owner shall not convey or attempt to enter into any lease prior to the execution of the final site plan, and any purported lease or rental contract entered into in violation of this subsection shall be void. 14 E.All public improvements shall be warranted against defects in materials and workmanship for a period of not less than one (1) year from the date of acceptance by the City. Upon expiration of any warranty period the financial assurance provided by this Section shall be released. 17.68.110 Affordability Controls A.Eligibility- General Policy. All affordable housing developed pursuant to this Chapter, including rental units and units (or lots) for sale, shall be leased or sold to eligible persons. The Developer or Subdivider shall at all times assure that affordable housing units are transferred to eligible persons, and it shall provide proof of its compliance with all eligibility and affordability controls to the City or its designated Monitoring Agency annually and/or upon written request. The City may require advance approval of eligibility. Prospective tenants or purchasers of affordable housing shall provide verification of their eligibility to either the Developer or Subdivider at the time they apply for housing subject to this Chapter. To be an eligible person for affordable housing, the person(s) must satisfy, at the time of application and continuing at all times thereafter, the following criteria: 1.The persons comprising the household must have a combined household income that does not exceed one hundred percent (100%) of the Grand County, Utah, Area Median Income (AMI), as published by HUD from time to time; 3.At least one person in the household must be either: i) employed full time in Grand County; ii) disabled; iii) a retired person over sixty years of age who was a full-time employee of an entity located within Grand County for at least five (5) continuous years immediately preceding his or her retirement; or iv) a parent residing with one (1) or more minor children; and 4.All persons occupying PAD affordable housing units must utilize the housing as their sole place of residence. B.Occupancy Restrictions. Leasing of affordable sales units and subleasing of rental agreements for affordable rental units shall not be permitted, except upon advance written approval by the City where the proposed occupants qualify as eligible person(s). Overnight accommodation uses shall not be permitted in any PAD housing units (including market-rate units). Persons occupying PAD market-rate units must utilize the housing as their sole place of residence; the use of market-rate units as second homes is prohibited. C.Rent Calculation. The Developer or owner offering affordable housing units for lease shall set the monthly rental rate at an amount that does not exceed thirty percent (30%) of the area median income (AMI) for a Grand County household, less a reasonable utility allowance, divided by twelve (12) months (the Allowed Rental Rate). The allowed rental rate shall be adjusted proportionately, depending upon the size of the unit and the income tier (moderate, low, very-low, or extremely-low) of the persons occupying the unit. Inflation adjustments in the allowed rental rate shall be made annually, as of January of each calendar year, and shall 15 be based upon the year to year increase in the Consumer Price Index (CPI-U), West Region, as published by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. The City or the Monitoring Agency will publish the inflation adjustment and provide same to Developers or owners for purposes of calculating Allowed Rental Rate increases. 1.Nothing in this Chapter shall preclude a Developer or owner from entering into a fixed rental rate lease with a tenant who is otherwise compliant with this Chapter at the time of execution. D.Sales Eligibility, Additional Requirements. In addition to the general qualifications set forth in Subsections A and B, above, eligible persons who purchase affordable housing units pursuant to this Chapter shall demonstrate that their total household net assets (asset value after deduction of the value of any liens-such as a car loan) shall not exceed forty percent (40%)of the original purchase price (OPP) or the subsequent sales price of the housing unit. E.Sales Price Calculation; Subsequent Sales. The OPP for affordable housing units developed pursuant to this Chapter shall be calculated as follows: principal, interest, taxes, and insurance (PITI) on the unit shall not exceed thirty percent (30%) of the Grand County AMI for a household of four divided by twelve (12) months. Assumptions used to calculate the OPP shall be: i) a five percent (5%) down payment; ii) a 30-year mortgage term; and a mortgage rate equal to the prevailing First Home rate, or its equivalent, of the Utah Housing Corporation (www.utahhousingcorp.org) (or equivalent). The City will determine OPP at the time of land use approval in a manner that reflects proportionate changes in OPP based on housing unit size. F.Maximum Appreciation. To assure continued affordability, each affordable housing unit developed under this Chapter shall be subject to a deed restriction, in a form approved by the City, which caps appreciation which may be earned upon subsequent sale of the unit. The maximum resale price (MRP) shall be: 1.The OPP plus three percent (3%) per year from the date of purchase to the date of sale, prorated for each month less than a calendar year; and 2.The actual cost of any capital improvements to the unit, including by way of example: i) the addition of finished living space; ii) remodeling of a kitchen or bath; iii) replacement of major components such as heating systems, cooling systems, windows, roofing, siding or the like; provided that the improvements have been permitted and inspected by the City Building Official. The property owner is responsible for documenting the value of all such improvements at the time of permitting. In no event shall capital improvements exceed five percent (5%) of the MRP. 17.68.120 Land Use Restriction Agreement and Covenants A.At the time of final approval of every PAD, the City and the Developer/Subdivider shall execute and record in the land records a Land Use Restriction Agreement (LURA) implementing and providing for enforcement of the affordability controls specified in this 16 Chapter. The LURA shall be a deed restriction running with the land, and binding upon the original grantor, and all successors and assigns in title. The LURA shall provide, at a minimum, the following: 1.The affordable housing units shall at all times be leased or sold to, and occupied by, eligible persons; 2.The affordable housing units shall be leased at rent levels affordable to eligible persons for a period of not less than fifty (50) years from the date of the initial certificate of occupancy; 3.The affordable housing units shall be sold at sales prices affordable to eligible persons for a period of not less than fifty (50) years from the date of the initial certificate of occupancy; 4.Subleasing of PAD affordable rental units and leasing of PAD affordable sales units is prohibited, except that eligible persons may lease or sublease affordable units as otherwise provided in this Chapter, and as verified by the City; 5.The offering or use of any PAD units (including market rate units) as overnight accommodations is prohibited; 6.The number of affordable units shall not be reduced and shall remain at the originally approved affordability level for a period of not less than fifty (50) years; and 7.Provisions for enforcement and monitoring of the Affordability Controls, including (as applicable) specific performance, damages, and an award of attorney fees and costs in the event of a violation. B.Maintenance. For PAD rental developments the LURA shall contain provisions providing that the owner shall maintain all units in a safe, sanitary, and functional condition in accordance with the provisions of the International Property Maintenance Code, as adopted by the City, or its equivalent. C.Recording Deed Restrictions. The LURA shall be recorded in the land records prior to the recording of the Final Plat for a PAD subdivision or prior to the execution of a Final Site Plan for a PAD rental development. D.Monitoring. The Developer/owner shall manage and operate all affordable units and shall submit an annual report to the City of Moab, or its Monitoring Agency, identifying which units are affordable units in a PAD, the monthly rent for each unit, vacancy information for each year for the prior year, monthly income for tenants of each affordable units, and other information as required by the LURA. The annual report shall contain information sufficient to determine whether tenants are eligible for affordable housing as provided by this Chapter. 17 1.A Subdivider/owner marketing affordable units for sale shall submit an annual report to the City identifying all affordable units sold in the last calendar year, the Original Purchase Price for each unit, and information sufficient to verify purchaser eligibility, as required by the LURA. The annual report shall contain information sufficient to determine whether home purchasers are eligible for affordable housing as provided by this Chapter. 2.The City or its Monitoring Agency shall be authorized to audit and review all Developer, Subdivider, and owner records pertaining to housing developed under this Chapter to verify compliance with this Chapter and all Affordability Controls. E.Extension of the LURA. The duration of the LURA may be extended for additional successive ten (10) year terms if the City Council certifies in writing at or before the expiration that there is a continuing need for affordable housing, and that it is reasonable that the affordability controls continue. In that case the City may execute any necessary documents to give effect to this provision. F.Covenants. Covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CCRs) for a PAD subdivision shall be reviewed and subject to approval by the City contemporaneous with final plat approval. The CCRs shall provide mechanisms for enforcement of community rules, collection of assessments (if applicable), and maintenance of common areas. 17.68.130 Impact Fees In conjunction with final approval of any PAD development the City Council may waive all or a part of the impact fees otherwise payable for the development. Any waiver shall be vested in the discretion of the City Council, based on the merits of the application in attaining the affordability goals of this Chapter. 17.68.140 Enforcement A.A Developer, Subdivider, or successor in title who fails to comply with the Development, Improvements Agreement, the LURA, or any other agreements, development approvals, or provisions of this Chapter shall be issued a notice of violation and informed of the default under the applicable agreement. Each such person shall be given a reasonable period of time, not to exceed thirty (30) days, in which to cure any default or breach under the applicable agreement. B.Upon declaration of default the City may exercise any remedies for violation available under City ordinances or Utah statutes, including, without limitation: i) proceeding against the financial assurance; ii). withholding building permits, certificates of occupancy, or certificates of zoning compliance; iii) obtaining an injunction to halt or abate zoning violations or breach of the agreement; iv) recording an affidavit of a lapse of plat/plan, in whole or in part; v) commencing an action for damages—including, but not limited to, damages for costs incurred in completing, repairing, or replacing required improvements or abating any violations; and/or vi) any other remedies available at law or equity, including the 18 remedy of specific performance. The City may combine remedies in its discretion and pursue some or all at different times, as may fit the applicable breach. In any action for injunctive relief the City need only prove a default or violation under this Chapter, and such relief shall be granted without the necessity of bond. C.The recording of an affidavit of lapse of plat/plan by the City shall result in the lapse of all prior land use approvals and the voiding of the subdivision of lots or the site plan within the real property specified in the affidavit. D.With respect to any default under the LURA or any other affordability controls of this Chapter, in addition to the remedies specified above, the City may obtain restitution or disgorgement of any proceeds realized by a Subdivider, Developer, or any successor in title from any leasing, sale, or other disposition of affordable housing units in violation of the affordability controls of this Chapter. In the alternative, the City may levy liquidated damages in the amount of five thousand dollars ($5,000.00) per violation. E.In any enforcement proceedings under this section the City shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorney fees and court costs, in addition to any other relief provided. 17.68.150 Interpretation This Chapter shall be interpreted and construed in a manner that conforms to applicable law. If any provision shall be found to be unlawful or otherwise unenforceable, it shall be stricken or reformed in a manner that conforms with applicable law, without invalidating the entire ordinance. 17.68.160 Implementation City staff may develop and implement program rules consistent with this Chapter. ***** This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon passage. 19 Passed and adopted by action of the City Council this 14th day of May, 2019. By:__________________________ Mayor Emily S. Niehaus Attest: By:_____________________________________________ Sommar Johnson, Recorder Date 1 CITY OF MOAB ORDINANCE 2019-_______ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY OF MOAB MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 17.68 PLANNED AFFORDABLE DEVELOPMENT (PAD) The following findings describe the intent and purpose of this ordinance: a.The City has enacted Title 17.00, Zoning, of the Moab Municipal Code, which governs land use and development within the City Limits. b.From time to time the City undertakes to revise its zoning ordinances to improve the quality of land development and align the Code with state law and contemporary planning concepts. c.The City has also adopted a Moderate-Income Housing Plan and is in the process of reviewing barriers to the construction of housing in the community. d.The Council is in support of eliminating barriers to increase the inventory of workforce housing. e.The City Council adopted the Moab Area Affordable Housing Plan as an addendum to the City of Moab General Plan on January 8, 2017. f.Housing stock in Moab is being consumed by second homes and tourism related lodging. Persons employed in tourism and lodging-related occupations are unable to afford housing given current wage and housing trends. g.Concurrently, the cost of housing has become increasingly unaffordable, with a median home price of $325,000.00, as compared to annual household median income of $52,000. h.The lack of affordable housing can result in crowding, undesirable living conditions, and a decrease in the quality of life for Moab workers and their families. i.The City has committed to encouraging the development of affordable housing opportunities by creating the Planned Affordable Development (PAD). j. The City finds that there is a public need to adopt this ordinance because market conditions are not supplying the needed numbers of affordable housing units for Moab residents. The City finds that it must undertake creative mechanisms to encourage the development of affordable housing. k.The approval of PAD housing subject to affordability controls is in the public interest and within the legitimate police powers of the City. Now therefore, the City of Moab enacts the following amendments to the Moab Municipal Code. 2 Chapter 17.68 PLANNED AFFORDABLE DEVELOPMENT Sections: 17.68.010 Purpose 17.68.020 Definitions 17.68.030 Permitted Locations and Housing Types 17.68.040 Minimum Project Area and Subdivision Lot Sizes 17.68.050 Performance Standards 17.68.060 Application Review Procedures 17.68.070 Submittal Requirements Miscellaneous Provisions 17.68.090 Appeal Procedures 17.68.100 Development Improvements Agreement 17.68.110 Affordability Controls 17.68.120 Land Use Restriction Agreement and Covenants 17.68.130 Impact Fees 17.68.140 Enforcement 17.68.150 Interpretation 17.68.160 Implementation 17.68.10 Purpose A.The purpose of this Chapter is to allow Planned Affordable Developments (PAD) that provide incentives for the development of affordable housing. To qualify, PAD affordable housing units are subject to deed restrictions that preserve the affordability of the units for a period of not less than fifty (50) years. The affordability controls provided in this Chapter are voluntary, entered into by contract between the City and the applicant in exchange for the zoning concessions authorized herein. B.As applicable to PAD developments, the provisions of this Chapter supersede any conflicting or inconsistent provisions which may be found elsewhere in the Moab Municipal Code. 17.68.020 Definitions The following definitions apply to this Chapter: 1.“Adjacent” means a parcel of land that shares a boundary with the parcel of real property included in an application under this Chapter. 2.“Advisory Documents” means planning documents adopted by the City from time to time, including: the Moab General Plan; Storm Water Management Master Plan; Sanitary Sewer Master Plan; Water Storage Distribution Master Plan; Natural Hazards Pre-disaster Master Plan; or similarly adopted planning documents. 3 3.“Affordable Housing” or “Affordable Units” means housing developed pursuant to this Chapter in which the sales price of the unit, or the rental rate for each unit, does not exceed the sums deemed affordable to individuals and families with annual incomes of one hundred percent (100%) or less of Grand County Area Median Income (AMI), as determined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the requirements of this Chapter. Affordable housing is further defined by the following income subcategories: a.“Moderate Income” means household income which is between eighty percent (80%) and one hundred percent (100%) of Grand County Area Median Income as defined by HUD. b.“Low Income” means household income which is between sixty percent (60%) and seventy nine percent (79%) of Grand County Area Median Income. c.“Very Low Income” means household income which is between thirty percent (30%) and fifty nine percent (59%) of Grand County Area Median Income. d.“Extremely Low Income” means household income which is below thirty percent (30%) of the Grand County Area Median Income. 4.“Area Median Income (AMI)” means the published estimate of median income in Grand County that is determined periodically by HUD, as adjusted for household size. 5.“Development” means new construction or remodeling of buildings or real property. 6.“Development Review Team (DRT)” means the committee of City employees including the Planning Director, Public Works Director, Building Official, and such other persons as may be designated by the City from time to time. 7.“Developer” means a person offering affordable housing units developed pursuant to this Chapter for lease or rent to Eligible Persons. 8.“Development Improvements Agreement (DIA)” means a written agreement between an applicant for a Planned Affordable Development and the City of Moab containing specific requirements to ensure the construction of specified public or private improvements, the phasing of construction, and security to ensure completion of improvements as a condition for Final Plat/Plan approval. 9.“Eligible Persons” means those persons authorized to occupy PAD affordable housing units, as further defined in Section 17.68.110, below. 10.“Final Approval” means the approval, with or without conditions, given by the City Council, providing the necessary authority for an applicant to: a) in the case of a PAD 4 subdivision, record the Final Plat and convey subdivision lots; or b) in the case of a PAD rental development, proceed with development of rental units. 11.“Final Plat” means a map of a subdivision under this Chapter which has been surveyed by a licensed professional land surveyor and acknowledged by the owner, and which accurately depicts streets, alleys, easements, blocks, lots, survey monuments, public/private improvements, and other attributes of a PAD subdivision. 12.“Final Site Plan” means a map of a rental development under this Chapter which has been surveyed by a licensed professional land surveyor and acknowledged by the owner, and which accurately depicts streets, alleys, easements, blocks, lots, survey monuments, building envelopes, public/private improvements, and other attributes of a PAD rental development. 13.“Habitable Room” means a heated room in a dwelling that is intended for human occupation. Habitable rooms do not include bathrooms, closets, storage rooms, utility spaces, or the like. 14.“Household” means a person living alone, or two or more persons, whether related by blood or marriage or not, who reside together in a single dwelling unit. 15.“HUD” means the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. 16.“Land Use Restriction Agreement (LURA)” means a contract between the City of Moab and an affordable housing Developer or Subdivider that is recorded as an encumbrance upon the real property to be developed, and that provides for continued enforcement of the affordability provisions and other requirements of this Chapter for a duration of not less than (50) years. A LURA shall run with the land and be binding upon the parties and their successors in title, as provided by its terms. 17.“Lot” means a tract of land defined in an approved plat which is developed for housing and which may be conveyed to a buyer by deed. 18.“Market Rate” means a housing unit offered for sale or lease that is not subject to limitations as to sales price or rental rates otherwise applicable to affordable units under this Chapter. 19.“Monitoring Agency” means the City of Moab, or its designee, charged with monitoring and/or enforcement of the affordability controls or development approval conditions for housing developed pursuant to this Chapter, including LURA provisions. 20.“Original Purchase Price” means the actual sales price for affordable housing units developed under this Chapter calculated as follows: principal, interest, taxes, and insurance (PITI) on the unit shall not exceed thirty percent (30%) of the Grand County AMI for a household of four (4) divided by twelve (12) months. Assumptions used to calculate the OPP shall be i) a five (5) percent down payment; ii) a thirty (30) year 5 mortgage term; and iii) a mortgage rate equal to the prevailing First Home rate, or its equivalent, of the Utah Housing Corporation (or similar agency). 21.“Overnight Accommodations” means short-term rental housing provided to short-term tenants for a period of thirty (30) consecutive days or less. 22.“Public Dedication” means streets, sidewalks, parks, open space, trails, or other areas of land or improvements to be dedicated to public use under this Chapter. 23.“Preliminary Plan” means a map of a rental development proposed under this Chapter which has been surveyed by a licensed professional land surveyor and acknowledged or authorized by the owner, and which accurately depicts streets, alleys, easements, blocks, lots, survey monuments, building envelopes, public/private improvements, utilities, and other attributes of a proposed PAD rental development. The Preliminary Plan shall include such other submittals as to planned improvements as are required by this Chapter. 24.“Preliminary Plat” means a map of a subdivision development proposed under this Chapter which has been surveyed by a licensed professional land surveyor and acknowledged or authorized by the owner, and which accurately depicts streets, alleys, easements, blocks, lots, survey monuments, building envelopes, public/private improvements, utilities, and other attributes of a proposed PAD subdivision. The Preliminary Plat shall include such other submittals as to planned improvements as are required by this Chapter. 25.“Preliminary Approval” means an approval, with or without conditions, given by the land use authority that provides the necessary authority for an applicant to proceed with the preparation of the Final Plat or the Final Plan. 26.“Project Area” means a defined tract of land, including all subsequent development phases, that is proposed for a PAD development application. 27. “Setback” means the minimum distance from a specified boundary that a structure or other feature must be located. 28.“Subdivider” means any person creating a subdivision pursuant to this Chapter and offering affordable housing units or lots for sale to eligible persons. 29.“Subdivision” means a described tract of land that has been surveyed by a licensed professional land surveyor and acknowledged or authorized by the owner, that describes two or more lots which may be conveyed to buyers, and that accurately depicts streets, alleys, easements, blocks, lots, survey monuments, and other attributes of a proposed PAD subdivision development. 30.“Site Plan” means a described tract of land proposed for rental development under this Chapter which has been surveyed by a licensed professional land surveyor and acknowledged or authorized by the owner, and which accurately depicts streets, alleys, 6 easements, blocks, lots, survey monuments, building envelopes, public/private improvements, utilities, and other attributes of a proposed PAD rental development. 31.“Unit” means a residential dwelling containing, at minimum, a permanently installed kitchen (including, a sink, stove, refrigerator, counters, and cabinets), bathroom (sink, toilet, and a shower or bathtub), bedroom (or sleeping area), living room (or area), parking, and storage space. All habitable rooms shall be separate from the bathroom(s). A residential unit may contain more than one bedroom, depending upon the needs of the development. Each housing unit shall have non-exclusive access to common elements within the particular development. 17.68.030 Permitted Locations and Housing Types A.Subject to the provisions of this Chapter, Planned Affordable Developments shall be allowed in the following zoning districts: 1.Residential Zones: R-3, R-4 zones; 2.Commercial Zones: C-1, C-2, C-3, C-4, and C-5 zones. B.Housing types for a PAD development shall conform to the types permitted in the underlying zoning district and the other provisions of this Chapter. All PAD units constructed in the C-3 zoning district shall be located on the second or higher floors of each building. 17.68.040 Minimum Project Area; Subdivision Lot Sizes A.Provided that all requirements of this Chapter can be met, there is no minimum project area required for a PAD development. B.Provided that all requirements of this Chapter can be met, there is no minimum lot size for lots within a PAD subdivision. 17.68.050 Performance Standards A.Affordability Concept. Applicants are encouraged to include a mix of one bedroom (or studio), two-bedroom, or three-bedroom units. PAD units shall have a maximum of three (3) bedrooms. The application shall demonstrate that the units for sale or rent qualify as affordable housing, as defined by this Chapter. Units developed under this Chapter (including affordable and market-rate units) shall not be used or offered as overnight accommodations. Where an application includes phased development, affordable units shall be constructed as part of each phase with not less than the minimum required ratio of market rate and affordable units in each phase. B.Market Rate Limits and Income Tiers. For PAD developments proposing up to five (5) units in a project area the number of market rate units shall not exceed one (1). In all other PAD developments the percentage of market rate units shall not exceed thirty percent (30%) 7 of the total number of units. Applicants are encouraged to provide a mix of units that are affordable to moderate-income, low-income, very-low- income, and extremely-low-income households. Where the percentage of any required type of unit in a PAD development, as applied to the total number of units, results in decimal of .5 or higher, the number of required units of a particular type shall be rounded upward. C.Minimum Unit Sizes. All housing units developed under this Chapter shall contain, at minimum: a permanently installed kitchen (including, at minimum, a sink, stove, refrigerator, counters and cabinets); bathroom (including a sink, toilet, shower [or bathtub]); bedroom (or sleeping area); living area; parking; and storage space. Housing units may contain multiple bedrooms or other functional spaces as needed. The minimum total area of the habitable rooms of PAD units (excluding closets, storage spaces, bathrooms, and utility spaces) shall be not less than two hundred seventy-five (275) square feet, measured from the interior of the unit. All housing units, and all habitable rooms within those units, shall comply with applicable building code minimum requirements, including the International Residential Code, as adopted by the State of Utah. D.Height of structures. The maximum building height of all buildings in a PAD development shall be as follows: Building height shall be measured from the average finished grade of the building to the midpoint of the highest plane of the roof. E.Setbacks; Adjacent Solar Access. Except as necessary to preserve solar access, the front, back, and side setbacks of a PAD development relative to other properties shall be provided by the underlying zoning district. PAD developments may be required to provide additional setbacks where necessary to provide adequate solar access to adjacent properties located immediately to the north of the project boundary. F.Open space/Common Facilities. PAD rental developments shall include open space for residents consistent with the size and scope of the project area. Open space, such as landscaping, recreation areas, entryways, commons spaces, bicycle racks, and setback areas shall comprise not less than five percent (5%) of the project area. Required parking spaces, stairways, elevators, and hallways shall not be calculated as open space. PAD subdivisions are not subject to the five percent requirement of this Subsection (F). G.Stormwater. Projects shall include engineered plans for the detention and conveyance of reasonably anticipated storm-water attributable to the project. Storm-water conveyances shall not connect to sanitary sewers. 8 H.Sidewalks/trails. PAD developments shall incorporate elements to facilitate pedestrian and bicycle access. Sidewalks are required along at least one side of all public street frontages. Trails may be required to connect to existing or planned trail systems or public streets. I.Parking. Vehicle parking shall be provided for all PAD developments at a rate of not less than one (1) off-street space per one-bedroom unit and a maximum of two (2) off-street parking spaces for each two-bedroom or larger unit. Wherever possible, parking areas shall be located within the perimeter of the building envelope. Hard-scape semi-permeable materials may be used for parking spaces. J.Lighting. Adequate lighting must be provided for public spaces and common areas. Light fixtures shall consist of a full cutoff, fully shielded, downward directed fixture. Wall mounted flood lights that direct outward toward other properties and roadways are prohibited. K.Manufactured housing. All manufactured housing to be utilized in developments under this Chapter shall comply with all other provisions of the building code. L.Culinary Water/Wastewater. All housing units shall be served by municipal culinary water and wastewater service. Fire flows shall be provided and hydrants installed in conformity with building codes and fire department requirements. M.Streets. Developments shall provide adequate public street access to each dwelling. All streets within an application shall be hard surfaced or paved and constructed in conformity with City design specifications, as determined by staff. Streets shall include concrete curb, gutter, and sidewalk, and be configured to allow adequate vehicle and emergency access. Streets shall be designed to promote efficient circulation and connectivity to other parcels and the remainder of the City street system. Street signage must be installed consistent with staff requirements. N.Utilities. Applications must include a utility plan showing feasibility and placement of electrical, telephone, cable, and internet services. O.Site Specific Elements or Standards. Depending on the scope of the project area, the City may require that site-specific design elements or standards be incorporated into an application as needed to address public safety, recreation, construction requirements, access, connectivity, or future phases of development. P.Storage. Each dwelling unit shall be provided with a separate, covered lockable storage space that is at least large enough to store as many adult bicycles as there are bedrooms in the unit. Q. R.Lot Sales with Finished Dwellings. PAD subdivisions shall include the sale of an affordable housing unit together with the sale of a lot, unless exempted by the terms of a development agreement. 9 17.68.060 Application Review Procedures A.General Procedures PAD applicants shall comply with the following review procedures. 1.Pre-application Meeting. A pre-application conference shall be held with planning staff to discuss the proposed development concept, likely development issues, and the requirements of this Chapter. 2.Application Submittal/Completeness Review. Upon submittal of an application and payment of the required fees, City Staff will review the application to determine if it includes, in form adequate for substantive review, all of the submittal materials required by this Chapter. If an application is found to be deficient, City staff will notify the applicant of the deficiency in writing. 3.Staff Review. In every case the application will be reviewed by the DRT and review agencies. The DRT may require that the applicant correct errors or incorporate design changes consistent with applicable codes, design standards, and/or review criteria. Where an application is substantially incomplete or grossly deficient, the staff may notify the applicant in writing that the application will not be subject to further review until such time as the enumerated defects are cured. 4.Planning Commission Review. Preliminary Plat or Preliminary Site Plans that have completed Staff review will be forwarded to the Planning Commission with a staff recommendation. The Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing to review the application and receive public comment, and it may: a) approve the application; b) deny the application; c) approve the application subject to conditions; or d) table the application pending receipt of additional information. a.At preliminary plat/plan review the applicant shall demonstrate that the plat or plan meets all submittal and performance criteria. Final construction drawings are not required, but all submittals must demonstrate the feasibility of the final design and conformity with this Chapter, applicable codes, and design standards. 5.Final Plat/Final Site Plan Review Procedures. When an applicant is ready to request Final Site Plan or Final Plat approval a Final Plat or Site Plan shall be submitted for review by Staff. Staff will review the design documents for completeness and verify that they incorporate changes or conditions required at the preliminary approval stage. Additionally, all related documents and agreements, including a Subdivision Improvements and Phasing Agreement, Land Use Restriction Agreement, and Covenants, Conditions & Restrictions (if applicable), and final construction drawings shall be reviewed and in final form prior to submittal to the City Council for final approval. 10 a.Final approval shall be in the form of an ordinance adopted by the City Council incorporating all the design drawings, the Final Plat or Final Plan, the conditions, and all development agreements comprising the PAD. Final approval is a legislative decision of the City and constitutes a site-specific development plan for all lands included in the project area. 17.68.070 Submittal Requirements A.A PAD application must be submitted to the Planning Department on the approved application form, together with the required review fee. The application must be signed by the record property owner or, if the applicant is not the owner, the applicant must deliver proof of approval signed by the owner. Components of the application submittal may contain multiple plan sets or reports, provided, that they are clear, legible, and successfully demonstrate the purposes required under this Chapter. Unless waived by the Planning Director, the application must include four copies and electronic PDF copies of all design drawings and submittals. B.PAD applications shall conform to the submittal requirements of Chapter 17.67, Site Plan Review, except that site plan submittal requirements are waived for development of up to six (6) dwelling units. Developments subject to this subsection (B) shall submit all required building permit submittals with the application, and City staff may require supplementation of submittals to assure compliance with this Chapter. Subdivision Developments subject to this subsection (B) shall also submit a proposed Final Plat for review and approval. C.Additional Submittals--Waiver of Certain Submittals. The Planning Director has discretion to require other submittals where appropriate for the review of a particular application. Alternatively, the Planning Director has discretion to waive or modify any requirement for a particular submittal if it is determined that the document or report is not necessary, or if an alternate submittal is justified for the review of a particular application. Any waiver shall be in writing labeled as a submittal waiver, shall identify the project by name and application number, and shall be signed and dated by the Planning Director. D.Conformity with Submittal Standards. All submittals must conform to the land use submittal standards adopted by the City. Submittals which do not clearly or accurately depict elements required for review of the project may be rejected, or staff may require revisions during the review process. E.Affordable Housing Development Plan. The Affordable Housing Development Plan shall contain, at a minimum, the following information: 1.A general description of the development, including whether the development will contain units for rent or sale; 2.The total number of market-rate units and affordable housing units (with descriptions of the income subcategories) and a depiction of where those units will be situated on the plat/plan; 11 3.The square footage of each market-rate unit and of each affordable unit measured from the interior walls of the unit; 4.The estimated sale price or monthly rent for each market-rate unit or lot and each affordable housing unit; 5.If construction of dwelling units is to be phased, a phasing plan stating the number of market-rate and affordable housing units in each phase; and 6.Statistical information as to the project area, developed area square footage, open space area, number of parking spaces, and the like shall be included. 7.Affordability calculations and assumptions demonstrating that the housing will be affordable under current economic conditions. F.Departmental Standards. All developments pursuant to this Chapter shall comply with departmental standards published by the City. 17.68.080 Miscellaneous Provisions A.Variances--Exceptional Conditions. In cases where unusual topographic or other exceptional conditions would pose a hardship on the applicant, variances from the strict requirements of this Chapter may be made by the Appeal Authority prior to Final Plat/Plan review. Staff shall provide a recommendation with respect to the proposed variance. The Appeal Authority may grant a variance, provided that it will not result in substantial detriment to the public good and will not substantially impair the intent and purpose of this Chapter. B.Accessory Dwelling Units Prohibited. Accessory dwelling units, as defined in the Moab Municipal Code, are not permitted within a PAD development. C.Vacating or Changing a Subdivision Plat. Any proposed vacation, alteration, change, or amendment to an approved PAD plat must be reviewed in conformity with the procedures and standards applicable under Utah law. An amendment that would violate one or more provisions of this Chapter or applicable development approvals may be grounds for denial. 12 D.Decision Matrix. Decisions under this Chapter shall be made by the following: Application/Action Advisory Body Land Use Authority Appeal Body Required Public Hearing Prelim. Plat/ Prelim. Site Plan City Staff Planning Commissio n AA**Yes, (PC) Final Plat/Site Plan City Staff City Council District Court No ** AA means the Appeal Authority, as specified in MMC 17.72.120 E.Proof of Service Availability for Non-City Authorities. Where the City is not able to provide culinary water or wastewater service to a proposed development, the applicant will be required to provide a current letter from the water or wastewater service provider demonstrating that water and wastewater service is available to the subject site. 17.68.090 Appeal Procedures A.Any person adversely affected by a preliminary land use decision, including a decision by the Planning Commission approving or denying a preliminary Plat or Plan, may appeal that decision to the Appeal Authority, and the appeal shall be governed by the procedures in MMC § 17.72.120 through 170. B.Any person adversely affected by a final land use decision of the City Council under this Chapter may appeal that decision by filing an action in the District Court for Grand County, Utah. C.Exhaustion of all administrative remedies shall be required prior to any applicant seeking judicial review of any final decision pursuant to this Chapter. Failure to exhaust administrative remedies shall result in the action or suit being dismissed. D.A judicial action seeking review or appeal of a final decision or action under this Chapter must be filed no later than thirty (30) calendar days from the date of the decision or order that is the subject of the appeal. E.Upon the commencement of a judicial appeal challenging any decision under this Chapter, the City shall promptly transmit to the district court true and correct copies of all submittals, testimony, orders, and file documents comprising the record pertaining to the application, including any transcripts or tape recordings of proceedings. F.There shall be no judicial review of legal claims or points of error which are not first presented for review or decision to the land use authority. 13 G.In any review pursuant to this Chapter (whether administrative or judicial), the reviewing body shall presume the decision made under this Chapter is valid. A final decision of the City Council shall be affirmed if it is found to be within the scope of legislative discretion. H.Disputes concerning or arising from the administration of this Chapter after final land use approval, including but not limited to enforcement of the Land Use Restriction Agreement, affordability controls of this Chapter, or the like, shall be heard by the District Court for Grand County, Utah. 17.68.100 Development Improvements Agreement A.The Development Improvements Agreement (DIA) shall be approved by the City Council at the time of approval of the Final Plat or Final Site Plan. A DIA between the City and the applicant is required to specify the overall development plan in writing and is a condition precedent to the commencement of construction. The DIA shall set forth the commitments and obligations of the City of Moab and the applicant, including, as necessary, a financial assurance for required public improvements, the applicant’s phasing plan, and other details particular to the development. The DIA shall be subject to review and approval by the City Council and must be consistent with all prior approval conditions applicable to the approved plan. B.The DIA may require that an applicant provide a performance bond, letter of credit, or other financial assurance to secure completion of required improvements, and/or as a condition for Final Plat or Final Site Plan approval. The financial assurance shall be provided in an amount equal to one hundred fifty percent (150%) of the estimated cost of all required public improvements, including: landscaping; road improvements; pedestrian ways, trails, sidewalks, curbs, and gutters; street lighting and signage; culinary water lines and fire hydrants; wastewater lines and wastewater disposal facilities; and storm-water improvements. City staff shall verify the correct amount of the financial assurance based upon review of the cost of the required improvements. Not more than ten percent (10%) of the financial assurance may be held to secure any warranty claims, as provided in the DIA. C.With respect to a PAD subdivision, no final plat for the subdivision, or any phase thereof, and no building permit for construction upon any lot within the subdivision shall be executed by the City until such time as either: 1) all public improvements are completed in accordance with the DIA and accepted by the City; or 2) a financial assurance as required by this Chapter is provided to the City. A Subdivider or owner shall not convey or attempt to convey any lot prior to the recording of the final plat, and any purported conveyance in violation of this subsection shall be void. D.With respect to a PAD rental development, no final site plan for the development, or any phase thereof, and no building permit for construction of housing units within the development, shall be executed by the City until such time as either: 1) all public improvements are completed in accordance with the DIA; or 2) a financial assurance as required by this Chapter is provided to the City. A Developer or owner shall not convey or 14 attempt to enter into any lease prior to the execution of the final site plan, and any purported lease or rental contract entered into in violation of this subsection shall be void. E.All public improvements shall be warranted against defects in materials and workmanship for a period of not less than one (1) year from the date of acceptance by the City. Upon expiration of any warranty period the financial assurance provided by this Section shall be released. 17.68.110 Affordability Controls A.To be an eligible person for affordable housing, the person(s) must satisfy, at the time of application and continuing at all times thereafter, the following criteria: 1.The persons comprising the household must have a combined household income that does not exceed one hundred percent (100%) of the Grand County, Utah, Area Median Income (AMI), as published by HUD from time to time; 3.At least one person in the household must be either: i) employed full time in Grand County; ii) disabled; iii) a retired person over sixty years of age who was a full-time employee of an entity located within Grand County for at least five (5) continuous years immediately preceding his or her retirement; or iv) a parent residing with one (1) or more minor children; and 4.All persons occupying PAD affordable housing units must utilize the housing as their sole place of residence. B.Occupancy Restrictions. Leasing of affordable sales units and subleasing of rental agreements for affordable rental units shall not be permitted, except upon advance written approval by the City where the proposed occupants qualify as eligible person(s). Overnight accommodation uses shall not be permitted in any PAD housing units (including market-rate units). Persons occupying PAD market-rate units must utilize the housing as their sole place of residence; the use of market-rate units as second homes is prohibited. C.Inflation adjustments in the allowed rental rate shall be made annually, as of January of each calendar year, and shall be based upon the year to year increase in the Consumer Price Index (CPI-U), West Region, as published by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. The City or the Monitoring Agency will publish the inflation adjustment and provide same to Developers or owners for purposes of calculating Allowed Rental Rate increases. 1.Nothing in this Chapter shall preclude a Developer or owner from entering into a fixed rental rate lease with a tenant who is otherwise compliant with this Chapter at the time of execution. 15 D.Sales Eligibility, Additional Requirements. In addition to the general qualifications set forth in Subsections A and B, above, eligible persons who purchase affordable housing units pursuant to this Chapter shall demonstrate that their total household net assets (asset value after deduction of the value of any liens-such as a car loan) shall not exceed forty percent (40%)of the original purchase price (OPP) or the subsequent sales price of the housing unit. E.Sales Price Calculation; Subsequent Sales. The OPP for affordable housing units developed pursuant to this Chapter shall be calculated as follows: principal, interest, taxes, and insurance (PITI) on the unit shall not exceed thirty percent (30%) of the Grand County AMI for a household of four divided by twelve (12) months. Assumptions used to calculate the OPP shall be: i) a five percent (5%) down payment; ii) a 30-year mortgage term; and a mortgage rate equal to the prevailing First Home rate, or its equivalent, of the Utah Housing Corporation (www.utahhousingcorp.org) (or equivalent). The City will determine OPP at the time of land use approval in a manner that reflects proportionate changes in OPP based on housing unit size. F.Maximum Appreciation. To assure continued affordability, each affordable housing unit developed under this Chapter shall be subject to a deed restriction, in a form approved by the City, which caps appreciation which may be earned upon subsequent sale of the unit. The maximum resale price (MRP) shall be: 1.The OPP plus three percent (3%) per year from the date of purchase to the date of sale, prorated for each month less than a calendar year; and 2.The actual cost of any capital improvements to the unit, including by way of example: i) the addition of finished living space; ii) remodeling of a kitchen or bath; iii) replacement of major components such as heating systems, cooling systems, windows, roofing, siding or the like; provided that the improvements have been permitted and inspected by the City Building Official. The property owner is responsible for documenting the value of all such improvements at the time of permitting. In no event shall capital improvements exceed five percent (5%) of the MRP. 17.68.120 Land Use Restriction Agreement and Covenants A.At the time of final approval of every PAD, the City and the Developer/Subdivider shall execute and record in the land records a Land Use Restriction Agreement (LURA) implementing and providing for enforcement of the affordability controls specified in this Chapter. The LURA shall be a deed restriction running with the land, and binding upon the original grantor, and all successors and assigns in title. The LURA shall provide, at a minimum, the following: 1.The affordable housing units shall at all times be leased or sold to, and occupied by, eligible persons; 16 2.The affordable housing units shall be leased at rent levels affordable to eligible persons for a period of not less than fifty (50) years from the date of the initial certificate of occupancy; 3.The affordable housing units shall be sold at sales prices affordable to eligible persons for a period of not less than fifty (50) years from the date of the initial certificate of occupancy; 4.Subleasing of PAD affordable rental units and leasing of PAD affordable sales units is prohibited, except that eligible persons may lease or sublease affordable units as otherwise provided in this Chapter, and as verified by the City; 5.The offering or use of any PAD units (including market rate units) as overnight accommodations is prohibited; 6.The number of affordable units shall not be reduced and shall remain at the originally approved affordability level for a period of not less than fifty (50) years; and 7.Provisions for enforcement and monitoring of the Affordability Controls, including (as applicable) specific performance, damages, and an award of attorney fees and costs in the event of a violation. B.Maintenance. For PAD rental developments the LURA shall contain provisions providing that the owner shall maintain all units in a safe, sanitary, and functional condition in accordance with the provisions of the International Property Maintenance Code, as adopted by the City, or its equivalent. C.Recording Deed Restrictions. The LURA shall be recorded in the land records prior to the recording of the Final Plat for a PAD subdivision or prior to the execution of a Final Site Plan for a PAD rental development. D.Monitoring. The Developer/owner shall manage and operate all affordable units and shall submit an annual report to the City of Moab, or its Monitoring Agency, identifying which units are affordable units in a PAD, the monthly rent for each unit, vacancy information for each year for the prior year, monthly income for tenants of each affordable units, and other information as required by the LURA. The annual report shall contain information sufficient to determine whether tenants are eligible for affordable housing as provided by this Chapter. 1.A Subdivider/owner marketing affordable units for sale shall submit an annual report to the City identifying all affordable units sold in the last calendar year, the Original Purchase Price for each unit, and information sufficient to verify purchaser eligibility, as required by the LURA. The annual report shall contain information sufficient to determine whether home purchasers are eligible for affordable housing as provided by this Chapter. 17 2.The City or its Monitoring Agency shall be authorized to audit and review all Developer, Subdivider, and owner records pertaining to housing developed under this Chapter to verify compliance with this Chapter and all Affordability Controls. E.Extension of the LURA. The duration of the LURA may be extended for additional successive ten (10) year terms if the City Council certifies in writing at or before the expiration that there is a continuing need for affordable housing, and that it is reasonable that the affordability controls continue. In that case the City may execute any necessary documents to give effect to this provision. F.Covenants. Covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CCRs) for a PAD subdivision shall be reviewed and subject to approval by the City contemporaneous with final plat approval. The CCRs shall provide mechanisms for enforcement of community rules, collection of assessments (if applicable), and maintenance of common areas. 17.68.130 Impact Fees In conjunction with final approval of any PAD development the City Council may waive all or a part of the impact fees otherwise payable for the development. Any waiver shall be vested in the discretion of the City Council, based on the merits of the application in attaining the affordability goals of this Chapter. 17.68.140 Enforcement A.A Developer, Subdivider, or successor in title who fails to comply with the Development, Improvements Agreement, the LURA, or any other agreements, development approvals, or provisions of this Chapter shall be issued a notice of violation and informed of the default under the applicable agreement. Each such person shall be given a reasonable period of time, not to exceed thirty (30) days, in which to cure any default or breach under the applicable agreement. B.Upon declaration of default the City may exercise any remedies for violation available under City ordinances or Utah statutes, including, without limitation: i) proceeding against the financial assurance; ii). withholding building permits, certificates of occupancy, or certificates of zoning compliance; iii) obtaining an injunction to halt or abate zoning violations or breach of the agreement; iv) recording an affidavit of a lapse of plat/plan, in whole or in part; v) commencing an action for damages—including, but not limited to, damages for costs incurred in completing, repairing, or replacing required improvements or abating any violations; and/or vi) any other remedies available at law or equity, including the remedy of specific performance. The City may combine remedies in its discretion and pursue some or all at different times, as may fit the applicable breach. In any action for injunctive relief the City need only prove a default or violation under this Chapter, and such relief shall be granted without the necessity of bond. 18 C.The recording of an affidavit of lapse of plat/plan by the City shall result in the lapse of all prior land use approvals and the voiding of the subdivision of lots or the site plan within the real property specified in the affidavit. D.With respect to any default under the LURA or any other affordability controls of this Chapter, in addition to the remedies specified above, the City may obtain restitution or disgorgement of any proceeds realized by a Subdivider, Developer, or any successor in title from any leasing, sale, or other disposition of affordable housing units in violation of the affordability controls of this Chapter. In the alternative, the City may levy liquidated damages in the amount of five thousand dollars ($5,000.00) per violation. E.In any enforcement proceedings under this section the City shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorney fees and court costs, in addition to any other relief provided. 17.68.150 Interpretation This Chapter shall be interpreted and construed in a manner that conforms to applicable law. If any provision shall be found to be unlawful or otherwise unenforceable, it shall be stricken or reformed in a manner that conforms with applicable law, without invalidating the entire ordinance. 17.68.160 Implementation City staff may develop and implement program rules consistent with this Chapter. ***** This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon passage. Passed and adopted by action of the City Council this ______ day of ______________, 2019. 19 By:__________________________ Mayor Emily S. Niehaus Attest: By:_____________________________________________ Moab City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: May 14, 2019 Title: Award and Approval of the Ballpark Concessionaire Contract Disposition: Discussion and possible action Staff Presenter: Patrick Trim, Sports and Rec. Director Attachment(s): -Request for proposals -Concessionaire contract -Proposal to provide concessionaire services Recommended Motion: I move to award the Concessionaire Contract to approve Sara Kimmerle, Moab Snacks, as the Ballpark Concessionaire Background/Summary: The Moab Recreation Department received one bid for a concessionaire for recreation activities that would take place at the Ballpark. The bid was provided by Sara Kimmerle, Moab Snacks, and she has been selected to provide concessions for sports programs through April 30, 2020. Sara has received all insurance and permits. She will begin service the first week of the baseball season. The food provided will include nachos, snow cones, non-alcoholic beverages, snacks, and healthy options. CITY OF MOAB REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS Ballpark Concessionaire April 2019 City of Moab 217 East Center Street Moab, Utah 84532 (435) 259-5121 CITY OF MOAB REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS BALLPARK CONCESSIONAIRE SERVICES FOR MOAB CITY RECREATION The City of Moab is now accepting requests for proposals for ballpark concessionaire services for Moab City Recreation. Request for proposal specifications are available online at: www.moabcity.org or at the Moab City Offices located at 217 East Center Street, Moab, Utah 84532. All proposals must be turned in to the Moab City Recorder’s Offices, located at 217 East Center Street, Moab, Utah 84532. Moab City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals; or to accept or reject the whole or any part of the proposal; or to waive any informality or technicality in the interest of Moab City. The Deadline for all requests for proposals is 3:00 p.m. Thursday, May 2, 2019. For further information, please contact the Moab City Recorder’s office at: (435) 259-5121 or Moab City Recreation at (435) 259- 2255. /s/ Sommar Johnson City Recorder Published in the Times Independent, April 18 and 25, 2019. REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE CONCESSIONAIRE SERVICES FOR THE CITY OF MOAB RECREATION DEPARTMENT The Moab City Recreation Department wishes to retain a concessionaire to handle all of the duties of a concessionaire, as specified in this request for proposals and attached contract, to run the summer recreation ballpark concession. The concessionaire will also have the option to run concessions for games throughout the youth football season, and can propose running concessions at other recreation sporting events throughout the year. The duration of the contract will be from May 1, 2019 to April 30, 2020 with a minimum amount of time to provide services from May 1, 2019 to July 1, 2019. At the discretion of the Moab City Recreation Department, this contract may be extended by up to one year at the same rate. The opportunity for renewal for future years would be available depending on the services provided, on the Moab City Recreation Department’s desire to continue or provide alternative avenues for concessions and the concessionaires desire to renew. In this capacity, the concessionaire’s responsibilities would include the following: 1.Provide concession services from May 1, 2019 through April 30, 2020; Monday through Thursday evenings from 5:00 PM until 10:00 PM during the regularly scheduled baseball/softball season at the ballpark located at 200 E. Center St. Times may be adjusted with the approval of the Moab City Recreation Coordinator. Concessionaire may also choose to provide concession services for the Moab City Youth Soccer Program and Little League Football and other recreation sporting events; please contact the Moab City Recreation Coordinator for dates. 2.At least ten (10) days prior to the concession services term, provide a copy of a current Moab City Business License and a Vendor Permit (contact the Treasurer’s Office for required licensing). The City of Moab agrees to waive all fees for said licenses and permits. 3.Provide an insurance certificate in the amount of one million dollars listing the City of Moab as a co-insured. 4.Provide a list of the kind of food and beverages and portions proposed to be served, along with a price list to be reviewed and agreed upon by the City of Moab. 5.Order all food and beverages to be sold on-site. 6.Publicize a price list for all items to be sold, as well as the hours of operation. 7.Limit sales to food and non-alcoholic beverages only. 8.Be responsible for proper disposal of solid waste at concession area and litter control of surrounding concession area. 9.Be responsible for hiring, scheduling and providing Worker’s Compensation Insurance for concession employees. 10.Provide all equipment, supplies, and structure(s) necessary to run the concession. 11.Agree that the entire cost of operation and maintenance of the concession shall be at the concessionaire’s expense. 12.Agree to abide by all ordinances of the State of Utah, Southeastern Utah District Health Department and the City of Moab, which, in any respect, relate to the business conducted by the concessionaire. 13.Be responsible for the security of all concessionaire equipment and supplies. 14.This agreement is non-transferable. Concessionaire shall not assign this Agreement to a third party nor permit outside use of any portion of the concession by a third party. The proposal shall not exceed three pages and should address the following: 1.Previous experience in concessions. 2.Business and personal references, including phone numbers for those employees expected to be staffing and managing the concession. 3.Provide resumes of key personnel involved with the concession. 4.Provide a general concessionaire work plan to accomplish the scope defined in the responsibilities of the concessionaire. The concessionaire work plan should demonstrate the understanding of the concessionaire requirements. 5.Provide a list of the kind of food and beverages and portions proposed to be served, along with a price list to be reviewed and agreed upon by the City of Moab. 6.Provide a photograph of the proposed structure(s). The City of Moab requests that any concessionaire interested in responding to this request submit a written proposal. BUSINESS/COMPANY/PERSON: MAILING ADDRESS: E-MAIL ADDRESS: PHONE NUMBER: LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY: LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER: WORKER’S COMPENSATION INSURANCE COMPANY: WORKER’S COMPENSATION INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER: AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE: DATE: PLEASE MARK YOUR ENVELOPE: “PROPOSAL FOR MOAB CITY BALLPARK CONCESSION” CONCESSIONAIRE CONTRACT This CONTRACT is made and entered into this __ day of __________ 2019, by and between CITY OF MOAB of Moab, Utah, a Municipal Corporation in the County of Grand, State of Utah, hereinafter referred to as the "City" and Baylee Spence herein referred to as "Contractor". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City advertised that sealed Proposals would be received for furnishing all labor, tool, supplies, equipment, materials and everything necessary and required for the Project described by the Contract and/or Contract Documents and known as BALLPARK CONCESSIONAIRE SERVICES; and WHEREAS, the City has awarded the contract to the above named Contractor, and said Contractor is now ready and able to perform the work specified in the Notice of Award, in accordance with the Contract and/or Contract Documents. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and performances stated herein, the sufficiency of which all parties acknowledge, it is agreed as follows: ARTICLE 1 Contract Documents. It is agreed by the parties that the following list of instruments, drawings, and documents which are attached and incorporated by reference constitute and shall be referred to as the Contract, and all of said instruments, drawings, and documents taken together as a whole constitute the Contract between the parties: a. Request for Proposals for the Project; b. Written proposal submitted by the Contractor; c. Change orders, approved written instructions, and written contract amendments; ARTICLE 2 Definitions. In accordance with Article 1, the definition of items provided in the General Contract Conditions applies to their usage in the Contract. ARTICLE 3 Contract Work. The Contractor agrees to furnish all labor, tools, supplies, equipment, materials, and all that is necessary and required to complete the tasks associated with the Work described in the Contract Documents, as limited to those items as indicated in the Notice of Award. ARTICLE 4 Contract Time. The Contractor hereby agrees to commence work under the Contract on or before the date specified in a written Notice to Proceed from the City, and to substantially and fully complete the work April 30, 2020. ARTICLE 5 Contract Binding. The City and the Contractor each binds himself, partners, successors, assigns, and legal representatives to the other party hereto in respect to all covenants, agreements and obligations contained in the Contract. The Contract constitutes the entire agreement between the City and Contractor and may only be altered, amended or repealed by a duly executed written instrument. ARTICLE 6 Legal Compliance, Indemnity.Contractor hereby warrants that it is licensed and authorized to do business in the State of Utah; that it maintains complying policies for workers compensation coverage and that said coverage shall be in place for the duration of its performance under this Contract; that it maintains a suitable policy of motor vehicle and comprehensive general liability insurance and that said policy shall be in place for the duration of this Contract; and that it shall perform this Contract in compliance with all applicable local, state, and federal laws. a.Contractor hereby agrees to indemnify and hold the City, its officers, employees, and agents harmless from all demands, claims, suits, or liability, including costs of defense, as result of damages or losses to persons not a party to this agreement and deriving, directly or indirectly, from the actions, omissions, or breach of duties under this agreement by the Contractor, its officers, agents, employees, or subcontractors. ARTICLE 7 Venue, Choice of Law. The place of performance under this Contract is Grand County, Utah. In the event of any legal dispute concerning the subjects of this agreement the parties stipulate to jurisdiction and venue in the District Court, Grand County, Utah. This contract shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the state of Utah. ARTICLE 8 Costs and Damages. In the event of any legal dispute concerning the subjects of this contract, the substantially prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorney's fees and court costs, together with all actual damages from breach. It is understood that in no event shall the City be liable to Contractor for consequential damages. ARTICLE 9 Notice of Breach, Limitation of Actions. In the event of the occurrence of any material breach of the terms of this contract the non-breaching party shall deliver written notice of same to the other party not more than forty five (45) days from the discovery of the act, omission, event, or default constituting breach. Failure to provide notice of breach as provided herein shall result in any such claim being barred. Any legal action pursuant to this contract shall be filed not more than one year from the date of written notice of breach. a. Delivery of notice shall be deemed sufficient if personally delivered or sent by First Class mail as follows: City Recorder City of Moab 217 East Center Street Moab, Utah 84532-2534 Contractor: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Moab, Utah, has caused this Contract to be subscribed by its Mayor and sealed and attested by its City Recorder in its behalf; and the Contractor has signed this Contract as set forth below. City of Moab, Utah Date:____________________By:_______________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _________________________ City Recorder (Seal) Contractor: Date:______________________By:________________________________ Title__________________ State of Utah ) § County of Grand ) On the day of , personally appeared before me , who duly acknowledged to me that they executed the same. Notary Public My Commission Expires:Residing in: Grand County Attachment A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE CONCESSIONAIRE SERVICES FOR THE CITY OF MOAB RECREATION DEPARTMENT CONCESSIONAIRE CONTRACT This CONTRACT is made and entered into this __ day of __________ 2019, by and between CITY OF MOAB of Moab, Utah, a Municipal Corporation in the County of Grand, State of Utah, hereinafter referred to as the "City" and Sara Kimmerle, Moab Snacks, herein referred to as "Contractor". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City advertised that sealed Proposals would be received for furnishing all labor, tool, supplies, equipment, materials and everything necessary and required for the Project described by the Contract and/or Contract Documents and known as BALLPARK CONCESSIONAIRE SERVICES; and WHEREAS, the City has awarded the contract to the above named Contractor, and said Contractor is now ready and able to perform the work specified in the Notice of Award, in accordance with the Contract and/or Contract Documents. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and performances stated herein, the sufficiency of which all parties acknowledge, it is agreed as follows: ARTICLE 1 Contract Documents. It is agreed by the parties that the following list of instruments, drawings, and documents which are attached and incorporated by reference constitute and shall be referred to as the Contract, and all of said instruments, drawings, and documents taken together as a whole constitute the Contract between the parties: a. Request for Proposals for the Project; b. Written proposal submitted by the Contractor; c. Change orders, approved written instructions, and written contract amendments; ARTICLE 2 Definitions. In accordance with Article 1, the definition of items provided in the General Contract Conditions applies to their usage in the Contract. ARTICLE 3 Contract Work. The Contractor agrees to furnish all labor, tools, supplies, equipment, materials, and all that is necessary and required to complete the tasks associated with the Work described in the Contract Documents, as limited to those items as indicated in the Notice of Award. ARTICLE 4 Contract Time. The Contractor hereby agrees to commence work under the Contract on or before the date specified in a written Notice to Proceed from the City, and to substantially and fully complete the work April 30, 2020. ARTICLE 5 Contract Binding. The City and the Contractor each binds himself, partners, successors, assigns, and legal representatives to the other party hereto in respect to all covenants, agreements and obligations contained in the Contract. The Contract constitutes the entire agreement between the City and Contractor and may only be altered, amended or repealed by a duly executed written instrument. ARTICLE 6 Legal Compliance, Indemnity.Contractor hereby warrants that it is licensed and authorized to do business in the State of Utah; that it maintains complying policies for workers compensation coverage and that said coverage shall be in place for the duration of its performance under this Contract; that it maintains a suitable policy of motor vehicle and comprehensive general liability insurance and that said policy shall be in place for the duration of this Contract; and that it shall perform this Contract in compliance with all applicable local, state, and federal laws. a.Contractor hereby agrees to indemnify and hold the City, its officers, employees, and agents harmless from all demands, claims, suits, or liability, including costs of defense, as result of damages or losses to persons not a party to this agreement and deriving, directly or indirectly, from the actions, omissions, or breach of duties under this agreement by the Contractor, its officers, agents, employees, or subcontractors. ARTICLE 7 Venue, Choice of Law. The place of performance under this Contract is Grand County, Utah. In the event of any legal dispute concerning the subjects of this agreement the parties stipulate to jurisdiction and venue in the District Court, Grand County, Utah. This contract shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the state of Utah. ARTICLE 8 Costs and Damages. In the event of any legal dispute concerning the subjects of this contract, the substantially prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorney's fees and court costs, together with all actual damages from breach. It is understood that in no event shall the City be liable to Contractor for consequential damages. ARTICLE 9 Notice of Breach, Limitation of Actions. In the event of the occurrence of any material breach of the terms of this contract the non-breaching party shall deliver written notice of same to the other party not more than forty five (45) days from the discovery of the act, omission, event, or default constituting breach. Failure to provide notice of breach as provided herein shall result in any such claim being barred. Any legal action pursuant to this contract shall be filed not more than one year from the date of written notice of breach. a. Delivery of notice shall be deemed sufficient if personally delivered or sent by First Class mail as follows: City Recorder City of Moab 217 East Center Street Moab, Utah 84532-2534 Contractor: Sara Kimmerle, Moab Snacks Moab, Utah 84532 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Moab, Utah, has caused this Contract to be subscribed by its Mayor and sealed and attested by its City Recorder in its behalf; and the Contractor has signed this Contract as set forth below. City of Moab, Utah Date:____________________By:_______________________________ Mayor ATTEST: _________________________ City Recorder (Seal) Contractor: Date:______________________By:________________________________ Title__________________ State of Utah ) § County of Grand ) On the day of , personally appeared before me , who duly acknowledged to me that they executed the same. Notary Public My Commission Expires:Residing in: Grand County Attachment A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE CONCESSIONAIRE SERVICES FOR THE CITY OF MOAB RECREATION DEPARTMENT Proposal to Provide Concessionaire Services For The City of Moab Recreation Department Moab Snacks Sara Kimmerle Moab, UT 84532 Liability Insurance Company: FLIP (Food Liability Insurance Program) Worker's Compensation information will be provided upon bid award �et, K.�1]4� Work Plan: Moab Snacks has fulfilled the "Moab Ballpark Concessionaire11 contract for the past two years. We have experience providing these services. Moab Snacks will provide concession services for the Moab City Recreation Department. We will service the Center Street Ballpark. Service dates will begin soon after the award of the bid and run through April 30, 2020. Moab Snacks will service the youth baseball/softball season and will consider servicing the youth football season if it seems practical. Proposed hours of operation are Monday-Thursday, 5-10 for service at the ballpark. Because the baseball season is shorter this year than previous years, Moab Snacks would welcome the opportunity to provide concession services at other city-sponsored events. Services provided shall be food and non-alcoholic beverages to include, but not be limited to: snow cones, nachos, candy, pre-packaged snacks, water, and sports drinks. Services shall be conducted in a 7x9 trailer mounted concession stand that has been finished to meet building, fire, and health department codes. It can also be locked when not in use to insure proper security of building, appliances, and goods. The trailer is light and can be taken anywhere concession services are needed. The trailer will utilize the electric tie-ins on-site. Proper sanitation precautions shall be taken to ensure a clean and healthy environment. Large trash and recycling bins shall be placed near the stand and around the facility to help with litter control. All waste shall be disposed of nightly. Menu: Item: Sale Price: Bottled Water $1.00 Nachos $3.00 Snow Cones $2.00 $4.00 Churros $2 Small Candy $.SO Sports Drinks $1.50 *Menu is subject to change **menu will include but not be limited to the above options Moab Snacks understands that all costs for maintenance and supplies for concession services, including insurance and Workman's Compensation are our sole responsibility. We also understand that all hiring, tax filing, product ordering, and payroll services are our sole responsibility. Respectfully Submitted by Sara Kimmerle, Owner, Moab Snacks �� �1/YWYh,e4� Relevant Job Experience: OTR Tire Factory & Auto Service 1-435-259-0066 Time: 02/14 -01/19 Title: Bookkeeper/Accountant Duties: Use Quickbooks to manage financial transactions of the company. File quarterly taxes and monthly sales tax reports and payments. Supervisor: Kyle Kimmerle, Manager. Education: References: Verl Packard Business Reference: Former Employer Wynette Hawks Business Reference: Piano Student Maralee Francis Personal Reference ·lx°t1'. LO JO lo C\AS�°' \?)\Al\d ��\it') \fcu\ev. s, �au. :/tY-.( e. vJ 1-\v-\ ref\/\ OJ�\.Q\*'� .A \}J\�ouJ� \)Def Ale,, s··\ l(\\l- 6 \ ec\1r, c_cL \ LA)QS \Ao..,k} "l Sv-r�ug_ l-i 3 \r\-\i "9 " Moab City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: May 14, 2019 Title: On-call Professional Engineering Services Disposition: Approve, Modify, Deny Staff Presenter: Chuck Williams, City Engineer Attachment(s): -Attachment 1: Moab Professional Engineering Services RFQ Recommended Motion: I move to approve the four selected Consultants for Professional Engineering On-call Services, and authorize the City Manager to sign their respective Consultant Services Agreements (Attachment 1, Exhibit A) Background/Summary: The City published a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) requesting Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) from qualified professional engineering firms licensed in the state of Utah for various engineering services related to the planning, design, construction, and implementation of infrastructure improvements for the City. The City received submittals from 16 firms.Per the terms of the RFQ, City engineering staff selected four consultants they believe are best able to provide the required engineering services based on the scoring criteria specified in the RFQ. The selected consultants were found to be satisfactorily qualified in the areas of Transportation, Culinary Water, Wastewater, Stormwater, and other miscellaneous engineering disciplines. The four selected firms are: Civil Science Infrastructure Inc. RB&G Engineering, Inc. JUB Engineers Russell Planning & Engineering 1 | 17 REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES For THE CITY OF MOAB’S INFRASTRUCTURE FACILITIES (Transportation, Culinary Water, Wastewater, Stormwater) Responses due on April 18, 2019 by 3:00 p.m. 2 SECTION I: GENERAL INFORMATION REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (“RFQ”) The City of Moab, a public entity of the State of Utah (the “Department”) is requesting a Statement of Qualifications (“SOQ”) from qualified professional engineering firms (the “Consultants”) licensed in the State of Utah for various engineering services related to the planning, design, construction, and implementation of infrastructure improvements for the Department. The Department intends to select up to four (4) Consultants that are determined by the Department to be the best able to provide the required engineering services based on the criteria specified herein and to generally set forth the terms and conditions whereby the Department will contract with the selected Consultants. SCOPE OF SERVICES The selected Consultants will provide professional engineering services that may include, but are not limited to: 1.Transportation Engineering – planning, modeling, geometric roadway design and rehabilitation, roadway improvements, roadway structures and bridges, utility design, drainage design, right-of-way, signing and striping, environmental, subsurface utility investigation, signal and traffic calming design, pavement management, etc. 2.Culinary Water Engineering – planning, modeling, water distribution design, water rights, water storage design and rehabilitation, water treatment, well design, pump stations, source protection, spring development, hydraulics, SCADA, etc. 3.Wastewater Engineering – planning, modeling, collection system design and rehabilitation, outfall design, lift stations, metering stations, treatment, hydraulics, etc. 4.Stormwater Engineering – planning, modeling, hydrology, hydraulics, routing, storm drain system design and rehabilitation, detention, retention, and infiltration design, etc. 5.Miscellaneous Engineering – GIS services, standard specifications and drawings, capital facility planning, master planning, impact fee and rate studies, asset management, funding administration and assistance, development review, construction management and inspection, boundary surveys, topographical surveys, right-of-way, easement documentation, aerial mapping, annexation plats, survey review, parks and recreation design and rehabilitation, concept planning, trail design, pedestrian bridges, field and court design, structural engineering, bridge design and evaluations, bridge rehabilitation and preservation, hydraulic structures, public meetings, permitting, preliminary engineering reports, feasibility studies, flood plain analyses, etc. 3 The selected Consultants may retain the services of other professionals on a sub- consultant basis as approved by the Department. Consultants must provide information about every sub-consultant that the Consultant proposes to use on the tasks outlined in the Scope of Services. The Department reserves the right to solicit other professional engineering services on a Request for Proposals basis during the term of the selected Consultant’s Consulting Services Agreement, even if the services required are within the Scope of Services described above or are within the scope of services described in the selected Consultant’s Consulting Services Agreement. For each project, the selected Consultant will work closely with City staff, potential stakeholders, the Department's other consultants, and/or other interested parties as determined by the Department. The selected Consultant will coordinate with the parties specified by the Department for each project. QUALIFICATIONS The selected Consultants must possess engineering expertise and experience in the following areas: master planning, capital facility planning, roadway design, culinary water design, wastewater design, stormwater design, preparation of construction documents, construction administration, community engagement, sustainability, and project management. TERM OF AGREEMENT The selected Consultants must enter into a written agreement with the Department to provide the services required under the Scope of Services. The agreement will expire three (3) years from the date the written agreement is executed unless terminated at an earlier date in accordance with the terms of the Consulting Services Agreement. Upon mutual agreement of the Department and the Consultant, this agreement may be extended for one year after the expiration of its three-year term, all terms and conditions remaining the same. The Scope of Services may be modified by written agreement by both parties. The form of the agreement proposed by the Department is attached as Exhibit "A". Consultants must include as a part of their SOQ a list of any changes Consultant proposes to the attached agreement. PROJECT SCHEDULES Each project assignment given to the selected Consultants by the Department must be completed in a timely fashion, and in accordance with any schedules agreed upon at the time of the project assignment. 4 FEES AND CHARGES The Consultants must submit to the Department, as part of their SOQ in a separate sealed envelope, a list of billing rates that includes any individual that may perform work as part of this agreement. For each new project, the Consultant must provide the Department a specific proposal, scope of services, and cost estimate. ADDENDA TO RFQ Addenda and Exhibits to the RFQ, if issued, will be posted to the Bid Sync website (www.bidsync.com). It is the responsibility of all parties submitting responses to the RFQ to make inquiry as to the Addenda and Exhibits issued and to ascertain prior to submitting a response that all Addenda and Exhibits have been received. All such Addenda and Exhibits are part of the RFQ documents and all respondents will be bound by such Addenda and Exhibits, whether or not received by the Consultants. Staff will respond to inquiries in writing by issuing and posting addenda on the City’s bid website. Consultants should submit questions electronically through the City’s bid website no later than 3:00 pm on April 9, 2019. No addenda will be posted after April 10, 2019. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY REQUIREMENT The selected Consultants must comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws including, but not limited to, employment laws that prohibit discrimination based on one’s race, color, sex, age, religion, national origin, disability, pregnancy, familial status, veteran status, genetic information, sexual orientation, or gender identity. STATUS VERIFICATION Under the Utah Immigration Accountability and Enforcement Act (UCA 63G-12-101 et seq.), any entity contracting with a public employer is required to participate in Utah’s Status Verification System. The selected Consultants will be required to certify that it participates in the Status Verification System and complies with the Act. DEPARTMENT CONTACT All questions regarding this solicitation should be directed, in writing, through the City’s online bid system (moabcity.org). Please do not attempt to contact other City staff members regarding your submittal. Please review all posted documents before contacting. 5 SECTION II: SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS & SELECTION PROCESS PROCEDURES FOR SUBMITTING A SOQ Consultants must provide the following information in their SOQ for evaluation by the Department (10 pages maximum, excluding cover letter and resumes): Note: The successful Consultants may not have qualifications or experience in all areas, but should detail which tasks from the Scope of Services the Consultant is qualified to perform. A.Cover Letter (not part of page limit) i Statement of clarification from the Consultant, its officers, or its employees for work completed within the limits of the City of Moab for private development or others where a conflict of interest may arise. ii Must be signed by an individual authorized to bind the Consultant contractually. B.Firm Introduction C.Project Team & Qualifications i Clearly identify the project manager (main point of contact) and other key team members. ii List of personnel anticipated to participate in the Scope of Services. iii Resumes of the proposed personnel including person’s qualifications, professional licensing, and past experience with tasks detailed in the Scope of Services. (not part of page limit) iv If sub-consultant(s) are to be used for portion of the Scope of Services, identify sub-consultant(s) and include resumes. D.Experience & References i Provide recent project work history that exhibits a depth and breadth of knowledge of municipal infrastructure planning, design and construction management as detailed in the Scope of Services section; and the names and contact information of the project’s owners ii Provide at least three (3) references from other municipalities for whom the Consultant has performed similar tasks and all applicable contact information. iii Discuss the firm’s quality assurance and quality control procedures. E.Such other data or information to assist the Department in applying the selection criteria outlined below. F.Evidence that the Consultant has professional liability insurance in the form shown in Consulting Services Agreement (Exhibit “A”). (not part of page limit) G.A list of any proposed changes requested by the Consultant to the Consulting Services Agreement (Exhibit "A"). (not part of page limit) H.In a separate sealed envelope, a list of billing rates for any individual that may perform work as part of this agreement. (not part of page limit) 6 It is the Consultant’s sole responsibility to read and interpret this RFQ and the written instructions contained herein. The Consultant must submit five (5) printed copies of all documents required as a part of the RFQ and one PDF copy on a USB drive. Submissions lacking one or more of the requested documents will be considered incomplete or irregular. SOQs must be submitted in a sealed envelope with the Consultant’s name, address, date of response, and the title “Statement of Qualifications for Professional Engineering Services” shown on the outside of the envelope. Please note that Moab is considered a “Rural” area by most couriers and overnight delivery is not guaranteed. Please submit responses to: Sommar Johnson City Recorder 217 East Center Street Moab, Utah 84532 Responses are due in the Recorder’s office at or before 3:00 pm on April 18, 2019. It is the Consultant’s responsibility to assure delivery of its submission to the Department prior to or at the designated date and time. In order to facilitate review by the Department, please submit materials in standard letter size: 8 ½” x 11”. SELECTION PROCESS & CRITERIA A Department-appointed Selection Committee will evaluate all SOQ’s received by the deadline. Submissions will be evaluated using the following selection criteria: 1.Project Team & Qualifications – 40% 2.Experience & References – 40% 3.Project Manager – 10% 4.Selection Committee Discretion– 10% Please do not contact City of Moab offices for selection information. All Consultants will be contacted by mail within 15 working days of submittal deadline. The Selection Committee will review each SOQ and rank the Consultants. The Department is not obligated to award a contract based upon the lowest fee schedule submitted. The Department may invite a short list of Consultants to interview with the Selection Committee. Any modifications to the proposed Consulting Services Agreement (Exhibit "A") will be negotiated at this time. 7 The Department is not required to accept any of the selected Consultant's suggested modifications to the proposed Consulting Services Agreement (Exhibit “A”) and may decline to further negotiate with any Consultant proposing terms of the Consulting Services Agreement unacceptable to the Department. All negotiated terms are subject to the final approval of the Department. SECTION III: MISCELLANEOUS Any additional information that the Consultant wishes to submit may be attached to its response in the form of appendices. Statements should be complete, but as brief as possible. The Consultant, by submitting a response to the RFQ, waives all rights to protest or seek any legal remedies whatsoever regarding any aspect of the SOQ process including, but not limited to, the Department’s selection of Consultants, the Department’s rejection of any or all SOQ’s, and the terms of any Consulting Services Agreement. MODIFYING OR WITHDRAWING SOQ Consultants may modify or withdraw their SOQ at any time prior to the closing time. The Department requests that any Consultant that desires to retrieve a SOQ for the purpose of withdrawing or to modify a SOQ must be submitted in a written request to the Recorder’s office. RIGHT TO REJECT OR WAIVE IRREGULARITIES The Department reserves the right to reject any and all SOQ’s and to waive any informality or irregularity in any SOQ received, in the interests of the Department. The Department is not liable for any expense incurred by a Consultant in preparing for and responding to this RFQ. COST OF DEVELOPING SOQ’s All costs related to the preparation of the SOQ and any related activities are the sole responsibility of the Consultant. The Department assumes no liability for any costs incurred throughout the entire selection process. PUBLIC INFORMATION Consultants are hereby advised that all SOQ’s shall become property of the Department at the time of submission. Information contained in the SOQ’s submitted to the Department will be available to the public upon inquiry immediately following the execution of a Consulting Services Agreement between the Department and selected Consultants. 8 SECTION IV: EXHIBITS A. Consulting Services Agreement B. Task Order 9 EXHIBIT A CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT ("Agreement"), is made and entered into this ____ day of ____, 2019, by and between the CITY OF MOAB, a public entity of the State of Utah (the "Department") and _________________, a Utah corporation (the "Consultant"). WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the Department issued a Request for Qualifications to Provide Professional Engineering Services (the "RFQ") soliciting statements from qualified consultants to provide professional and technical services in connection with various infrastructure projects to be undertaken by the Department in the next three years; and WHEREAS, Consultant is an engineering firm which, based upon its experience, expertise, and the other selection criteria set forth in the RFQ, has been selected to advise and assist the Department in its infrastructure objectives. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth and for other good and valuable consideration, the parties agree as follows: 1.Agreement: This Consulting Services Agreement consists of this document and all subsequent Task Orders issued hereunder. 2.Scope of Services/Coordination: Consultant’s Scope of Services (“Services”) to the Department consists of individual projects falling under the following categories: a.Transportation Engineering – planning, modeling, roadway design and rehabilitation, roadway improvements, roadway structures and bridges, utility design, drainage design, right-of-way, environmental, subsurface utility investigation, signal and traffic calming design, pavement management, etc. b.Culinary Water Engineering – planning, modeling, water distribution design, water rights, water storage design and rehabilitation, water treatment, well design, pump stations, source protection, spring development, hydraulics, SCADA, etc. c.Wastewater Engineering – planning, modeling, collection system design and rehabilitation, outfall design, lift stations, metering stations, treatment, hydraulics, etc. d.Stormwater Engineering – planning, modeling, hydrology, hydraulics, routing, storm drain system design and rehabilitation, detention, retention, and infiltration design, etc. e.Miscellaneous Engineering – GIS services, standard specifications, capital facility planning, master planning, impact fee and rate studies, asset management, funding administration and assistance, development review, 10 construction management and inspection, boundary surveys, topographical surveys, right-of-way, easement documentation, aerial mapping, annexation plats, survey review, parks and recreation design and rehabilitation, concept planning, trail design, pedestrian bridges, field and court design, structural engineering, bridge design and evaluations, bridge rehabilitation and preservation, hydraulic structures, public meetings, permitting, preliminary engineering reports, feasibility studies, flood plain analyses, etc. 3. Task Orders: Individual projects are defined by Task Orders entered into by the parties during the term of this Agreement. All Task Orders are subject to the terms of this Agreement. Each Task Order will be numbered sequentially and will be similar in format to the Sample Task Order form, attached as Exhibit “A.” Each Task Order must specify the following: a.A description of work to be completed under the Task Order; b.The date on which the work covered by the Task Order is to begin; c.The date on which the work is to be completed; d.The estimated cost that the Department will be required to pay for Consultant’s Services including proposed staff and rates; and e.The maximum cost that the Department will pay for Consultant’s Services. The Consultant may only provide the Services included in a Task Order that has been signed by an authorized representative of the Department and of the Consultant. 4.Compensation and Invoicing: The Consultant agrees to invoice the Department for providing Services under a Task Order according to the approved Billing Rates, attached as Exhibit “B.” A Task Order’s total invoiced cost may not exceed the maximum cost established within the Task Order. The Department will pay the Consultant any undisputed amount within 30 days of receiving an invoice. If the Department disputes an amount on an invoice, it will provide the Consultant written notice of the dispute within 10 days or receiving the invoice. Upon resolving the dispute, the Department will pay the Consultant the resolution amount within 10 days of the resolution. 5.Schedule: Services under this Agreement will begin upon the signing of a Task Order and must be completed in accordance with schedule established in the Task Order. 6.Term of Agreement: This Agreement terminates at 12:59:59 p.m. on July 12, 2020. The parties may mutually extend this Agreement for an additional one-year term if both parties provide written confirmation of the extension prior to the expiration of this Agreement. 7.Amendments: Any change in this Agreement must be mutually agreed upon by the Department and the Consultant and must be set forth in a written amendment to this Agreement. 11 8.Sub-consultant Agreements: This Agreement will be performed by the Consultant or, at a minimum, under its supervision. All personnel engaged in providing Services must be fully qualified and must be authorized or permitted under State and local law to perform such services. In order to perform one or more of the services listed in the Scope of Services, it may be necessary for the Consultant to retain the professional services of various sub-consultants. The Department has preapproved the sub- consultants and their associated hourly rates as listed in Exhibit "C". For any sub- consultant not listed in Exhibit "C," the Consultant must receive written prior approval from the Department of the unlisted sub-consultant and its associated fees prior to that sub-consultant performing any services under this Agreement. The Department reserves the right to withhold approval of any non-preapproved sub-consultant for any reason. 9.Department's Obligations: (a)The Department will provide, at no expense to the Consultant, such books, maps, records, plans, reports, statistics or other data or information, which are existing, as may be reasonably required by the Consultant to perform the tasks or services within two working days after receipt of a written request by the Consultant for such data. (b)The Department will promptly review all documents, plan reports, studies, or other submittals from the Consultant. 10.Assignment: The Consultant may not assign any obligation under this Agreement and may not transfer any obligation contained herein whether by assignment or novation. 11.Discrimination: The Consultant must comply with all applicable federal, state, and local employment laws including, but not limited to, those which prohibit discrimination based on one’s race, color, sex, age, religion, national origin, disability, pregnancy, familial status, veteran status, genetic information, sexual orientation, or gender identity. 12.Conflicts of Interest: The Consultant represents and warrants that none of its officers, employees, or immediate family members of its officers and employees is or has been an elected official, employee, board member, or commission member of the Department or its affiliates who influences the RFP process, selection of a consultant, or the subsequent written agreement. The Consultant also represents and warrants that it has not provided any compensation in any form, whether directly or indirectly, to an elected official, employee, board member, or commission member of the Department or its affiliates who influences the RFP process, selection of a consultant, or the subsequent written agreement. 13.Status Verification: The Consultant represents and warrants that it and each sub- consultant participates in the Status Verification System as required under the Utah Immigration Accountability and Enforcement Act (UCA 63G-12-101 et seq.). The 12 Consultant and any sub-consultant must provide certification to the Department of its participation in the Status Verification System prior to performing any Services under this Agreement. 14.Records: The Consultant must maintain complete and accurate records with respect to charges for services and expenses reimbursable under this Agreement. All such records must be maintained on a generally accepted accounting basis and must be clearly identified and available to the Department for audit. The Consultant must provide free access to the representatives of the Department or their appointees at all proper times to such books and records. The Department has the right to examine and audit such books and records, and to make copies and transcripts therefrom as necessary, and to inspect all work data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to this Agreement for a period of three years from the date of final payment under this Agreement. 15.Ownership of Materials: All materials, maps, models and other documentation prepared in providing services pursuant to this Agreement, whether completed or uncompleted, or draft or final, will become the property of the Department and must be submitted to the Department upon completion of each assignment or the earlier termination of the Consultant's services with respect to such assignment. The Architect hereby assigns to the Department all the Architect's ownership and retained rights in such materials, maps, models and other documentation, including the copyright. The Department will have unrestricted authority to publish, disclose, distribute and otherwise use, in whole or in part, any reports, data or other materials prepared under this Agreement. Credits for work prepared by the Consultant will be included with all documents issued by the Department. The Consultant retains the right to duplicate and retain copies of all reports, maps and other documents prepared in providing services pursuant to this Agreement. 16.Independent Contractor Relationship: The legal relationship of the Consultant to the Department with respect to the Services required under this Agreement is that of an independent contractor and not as an agent or employee. 17.Representatives and Notices: The following are designated as representatives of the parties to this Agreement: (a)The Department designates Sommar Johnson, City Recorder of the City of Moab, as its representative in all matters under this Agreement and all notices given to the Department must be addressed to the City of Moab, 217 east Center Street, Moab, Utah 84532, Attention: Sommar Johnson, City Recorder. (b)The Consultant designates ____________________________ as its representatives in all matters under this Agreement and all notices sent to the Consultant must be addressed to the above designated representative at _______________________________. 13 18.Indemnification: The Consultant agrees and covenants to indemnify, and hold harmless the Department and the City of Moab, and their officials, officers, directors, employees, agents, successors and assigns, from and against any and all claims, losses, liabilities, damages, and expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees, arising out of or based in whole or in part upon: (i) any negligent act, error or omission or intentional misconduct of the Consultant, the Consultant's sub-consultants or their officers, principals, members, partners, employees, agents, successors, executors, administrators or assigns in the performance of services or work pursuant to this Agreement, or (ii) any breach of this Agreement. 19.Termination for Cause: (a)If the Consultant fails to fully perform in a timely and proper manner its obligations under this Agreement, or if the Consultant violates any of the covenants, agreements, or stipulations of this Agreement, the Department will thereupon have the right upon not less than 15 days' prior written notice to terminate this Agreement effective as of the date set forth in such written notice. In such event, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, and reports prepared by the Consultant or the Consultant's sub-consultants under this Agreement will, at the option of the Department, be delivered to the Department, and upon payment of all undisputed amounts for all services satisfactorily performed prior to the effective date of termination. Notwithstanding the above, the Consultant is not relieved of liability to the Department for damages sustained by the Department by virtue of any breach of this Agreement by the Consultant, and the Department may withhold any payments otherwise due to the Consultant until such time as the exact amount of damages due to the Department from the Consultant is determined. (b)If the Department fails to fully perform in a timely and proper manner its obligations under this Agreement, or if the Department violates any of the covenants, agreements or stipulations of this Agreement, the Consultant will thereupon have the right upon not less than 15 days' prior written notice, to terminate this Agreement effective as of the date set forth in such notice. In such event, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, and reports prepared by the Consultant under this Agreement will, at the option of the Department, be delivered to the Department, and the Department must pay the Consultant in accordance with this Agreement all undisputed amounts for all services satisfactorily performed prior to the effective date of termination. Notwithstanding the above, the Department will not be relieved of liability to the Consultant for damages sustained by the Consultant by virtue of any breach of this Agreement by the Department. 20.Termination for Convenience: The Department may terminate this Agreement and/or the Services with respect to a project assigned pursuant to this Agreement for its convenience at any time by serving the Consultant with notice in writing stating an effective date of termination at least five days hence, at which time this Agreement 14 and/or the assignment of a project is deemed terminated. If the Department terminates this Agreement and/or an assignment as provided herein, the Consultant will be paid all undisputed amounts for all services rendered and expenses incurred in accordance with this Agreement to the effective date of termination. 21.Compliance with Laws: The Consultant must comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances, codes and regulations including, but not limited to, obtaining all applicable licenses and permits to perform Services. 22.Confidentiality: All of the draft and final reports prepared or assembled by the Consultant under this Agreement are confidential until made public by the Department. The Consultant agrees that the draft and final reports may not be made available to any person or organization without the prior written approval of the Department. The Consultant also agrees to keep any information received from the Department confidential unless the Department provides prior written approval authorizing the release of such information. 23.Applicable Law. This Agreement and all transactions contemplated hereunder and/or evidenced hereby is governed by, construed under, and enforced in accordance with the internal laws of the State of Utah without giving effect to any choice of law or conflict of law rules or provisions, whether of the State of Utah or any other jurisdiction, that would cause the application of the laws of any jurisdiction other than Utah. 24.Attorneys’ Fees. If any dispute arises out of the obligations of the Parties under this Agreement or concerning the meaning or interpretation of any provision contained herein, the non-prevailing party will pay the prevailing party's costs and expenses of such litigation including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees. 25.Standard of Care: Consultant represents that the Services performed by Consultant under this Agreement are conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by or under the direction of members of Consultant’s profession currently practicing in the same locality and under similar conditions. 26.Insurance: The Consultant must secure and maintain throughout the term of this Agreement and the term of any extension hereof from insurers licensed by the State of Utah and acceptable to Department, the following insurance coverages with insurance limits specified below: a.Workers' Compensation Insurance with statutory limits; b.Employers Liability Insurance with limits of not less than $1,000,000; c.General Liability Insurance with combined single limits of not less than $1,000,000 per claim/annual aggregate; d.Automobile Liability Insurance, including owned, non-owned and hired vehicles, with combined single limits of not less than $1,000,000 per claim/annual aggregate; 15 e.Professional Liability Insurance with limits of not less than $1,000,000 per claim/annual aggregate and a per claim deductible not greater than $25,000, unless approved by the Department in writing, to be maintained continuously for not less than two years after the termination of this Agreement or any extension hereof; f.Valuable Papers and Records Insurance - $50,000 per occurrence; and g.Electronic Data Processing Insurance (Data and Media Coverages) - $50,000 per occurrence. The Department and City of Moab must be named as additional insureds of the coverages required by Subparagraphs 22c and 22d above. The maintenance in full force and effect of the insurance coverages and limits of liability required by this paragraph 22 is a condition precedent to the Consultant's exercise or enforcement of any rights under this Agreement. The Consultant may not commence services under this Agreement until all the insurance required herein have been obtained by the Consultant. Upon request of the Department, the Consultant shall furnish to the Department Certificates of Insurance verifying that such insurance has been obtained. Such Certificates of Insurance shall incorporate a commitment to provide written notice to the Department at least 30 days prior to any cancellation, non-renewal or material modification of the policies. If the Consultant at any time neglects or refuses to procure the insurance required by this paragraph 22, or should such insurance be cancelled, the Department has the right, but not the obligation, to procure such insurance at the cost and expense of the Consultant, and the cost thereof may be deducted from any monies then due or thereafter due to the Consultant. If the Department or The City of Moab is damaged by the failure of the Consultant to purchase and maintain the insurance coverage and limits of liability required by this paragraph 22 of this Agreement, the Consultant will bear all reasonable costs, expenses and damages incurred by the Department or The City of Moab arising out of such failure to purchase and maintain the insurance coverage and/or limits of liability required by this paragraph 22. When requested by the Department, the Consultant agrees to make available for inspection and copying by the Department, the original insurance policies required by this paragraph 22, including the declarations page and any endorsements to such policies. 27.Severability: In the event that any provision of this Agreement is held to be void, the voided provision will be considered severable from the remainder of this Agreement and will not affect any other provision in this Agreement. If the provision is invalid due to its scope or breadth, the provision will be considered valid to the extent of the scope or breadth permitted by law. 28.Entire Agreement: This Agreement contains all of the agreements, representations and understandings of the parties hereto and supersedes any previous understandings, commitments, proposals, or agreements whether oral or written, and may only be modified or amended as herein provided; and the parties further agree that the terms and conditions of any order or other instrument issued by either party hereto in connection with this Agreement which are additive to or inconsistent with the provisions of this Agreement, except a duly executed amendment hereto, shall not amend this Agreement. 16 IN WITNESS WHEREFORE, the City of Moab and the Consultant have executed this Agreement the day and year first above written. THE CITY OF MOAB _________________________________ Attest: _________________________________ CONSULTANT __________________________________ Name, Position 17 EXHIBIT B TASK ORDER Task Order No. _________ Date: _________ Consultant Project No. _________ Consultant Information Attn: ______________ This Task Order No.___ is issued pursuant to our Agreement dated______________ and unless otherwise specified herein, the performance of services hereunder and the payment therefore shall be subject to the terms and conditions of said Agreement. The services authorized hereunder are described below. Description of Services: Billing Procedures: ______________________________________________________________ Total Fee: ______________________________________________________________ Estimate of Time Starting Date: ________ Ending Date: ________________ W Owner’s Representative: Consultant’s Representative: ______________________________________________________________ Accepted: Owner: Consultant: ____________________________________________________________ Name/Title: _____________________Name/Title: _____________________ Date: ___________________Date: ___________________ Moab City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: May 14, 2019 Title: Resolution 33-2019- UDOT Parking Structure Agreement Disposition: Discussion and possible action Staff Presenter: Chuck Williams, City Engineer Attachment(s): -Attachment 1 - Proposed Resolution -Attachment 1 - UDOT Parking Structure Cooperative Agreement Recommended Motion: I move to adopt Resolution 33-2019 approving the City to enter into a Cooperative Agreement with the Utah Department of Transportation for purposes of constructing a Downtown Parking Structure . Background/Summary: In 2017 the state legislature appropriated approximately $160 million to assist tourism based communities in Reducing Traffic Congestion, Supporting Economic Development and to Increase Recreation & Tourism Opportunities. In 2017/2018 UDOT Region 4 held a series of workshops to determine the “Arches Area” needs to compete for the available funding. The number 3 highest rated project was a West of Main Street Downtown Parking Structure. In May 2018 the State Transportation Commission awarded $10 million to the Arches Area for a Downtown Parking Structure and Dispersed Parking Lots. UDOT is currently managing the Dispersed Parking Lots project. UDOT has requested that the City of Moab manage the Downtown Parking Structure project. The mechanism which will enable the City to do so is by signing the attached UDOT Cooperative Agreement. 1 CITY OF MOAB RESOLUTION NO. 33-2019 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH THE UTAH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A DOWNTOWN PARKING STRUCTURE The following findings describe the reasons for this resolution and explain its purpose: a.In 2017 the state legislature appropriated approximately $160 million to assist tourism based communities in Reducing Traffic Congestion, Supporting Economic Development and to Increase Recreation & Tourism Opportunities. b.In 2017/2018 UDOT Region 4 held a series of workshops to determine the “Arches Area” needs to compete for the available funding. The number 3 highest rated project was a West of Main Street Downtown Parking Structure. c.In May 2018 the State Transportation Commission awarded $10 million to the Arches Area for a Downtown Parking Structure and Dispersed Parking Lots. d.UDOT has requested that the City of Moab manage the Downtown Parking Structure project. The mechanism which will enable the City to do so is by signing the attached UDOT Cooperative Agreement. e.The City finds that there is a compelling public interest to enact this resolution due to the need for the Downtown Parking Structure Now therefore, the City of Moab resolves as follows: 1.Definitions. The term “Downtown Parking Structure” is as is defined in the UDOT Cooperative Agreement. 2.Direction to Staff. Staff is directed to pursue completion of the Downtown Parking Structure within the timeframe identified in the UDOT Cooperative Agreement. 3.UDOT Cooperative Agreement. The Mayor is authorized to sign the attached UDOT Cooperative Agreement. PASSED AND APPROVED by a majority of the City Council, this 14th day of May, 2019. By:___________________________________________ Emily S. Niehaus, Mayor Date Attest: By:___________________________________________ Sommar Johnson, Recorder Date 1 of 3 Contingency Paying Coop (Local Preforming Work) Feb. 17, 2016 5/9/2019 State of Utah Department of Transportation Cooperative Agreement Local Agency Performing Work for UDOT Project Description: Moab Downtown Parking Structure Local Agency: The City of Moab $8,300,000 Pin: 16912 FINET Program 73036 Project: S-0191(167)125 Date Executed THIS AGREEMENT,made and entered into on the ___________,by and between the UTAH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,hereinafter referred to as “UDOT”,and The City of Moab ,a political subdivision of the State of Utah, hereinafter referred to as the “Local Agency.” The Moab area has been identified for transportation improvements in area with recreation and tourism activity that experiences significant congestion.Moab City is receiving money designated for this purpose in SB 277 (2017).The Transportation Commission has funded a parking structure in downtown Moab City. Subject to the attached provisions,Local Agency will perform the Work for the Project.UDOT will not provide any additional funds beyond the lump sum payment amount of $8,300,000.00. Description of Work: Moab City will construct a parking structure in downtown Moab to accommodate 320 parking stalls. The structure will be 4 levels, 3 above ground and 1 below. The chosen location for this structure is on City owned land located mid-block between 100 N and Center Street. The City of Moab will contract engineering, architectural, and any additional services needed to deliver the project for advertisement within 14 months from the effective date of this agreement. No more than 6% or $498,000 of these funds will be used for structural aesthetics. The City of Moab will also be responsible for construction inspection and engineering management, UDOT will not be paying the City of Moab separately for any of these costs. The City of Moab will own, operate, and maintain the parking facility. Any remaining funds from the parking structure project will be used to further the design and construction of Main Street improvements from 100 S to 200 N as detailed in the funding request. UDOT will give The City of Moab $8,300,000 for this work. The City of Moab is required to maximize the parking stall to extent feasible. The proposed structure is based on a few assumptions. 1.The parking structure will be four levels, but The City of Moab is concerned that ground water or utilities may make a below ground level unfeasible, height limitations will only allow for 3 levels above ground. If the structure is reduced to three levels, then 320 stalls may not be feasible. 2.Current plans also require some minor right-of-way acquisition, it appears the property owner is agreeable; however, if this property cannot be acquired by The City of Moab, the lack of this right-of-way may also reduce the number of stalls possible. Costs to include: List or Description of Items Item #Item Description Estimated Quantity Unit Price Estimated Cost #1 Downtown parking structure and Main Street improvements 1 $8,300,000 $8,300,000.00 #2 #3 Estimated Total Cost $8,300,000.00 LUMP SUM PAYMENT: TOTAL AMOUNT TO BE PAID BY UDOT (Fill in only if actual cost approach is not used.) $8,300,000.00 2 of 3 Contingency Paying Coop (Local Preforming Work) Feb. 17, 2016 5/9/2019 Project Completion Date: TBD . Provisions .Local Agency’s contractor will perform the Work described in this Agreement.If Main Street work is performed,UDOT will review the plans and specifications.The City of Moab will only perform Main Street Work from UDOT approved plans..Local Agency will notify UDOT two weeks in advance prior to starting the Main Street work so UDOT may inspect the work.UDOT has the right to inspect the Main Street work but may choose not to exercise this right.Regardless of any inspection by UDOT, Local Agency is still required to construct the Main Street work in accordance with the plans and specifications.UDOT,through its inspection of the Main Street work,will provide Local Agency with information addressing any problems or concerns UDOT may have with acceptance of the work.Upon completion of the Main Street work,the Local Agency will contact UDOT for a final review and inspection of Main Street Work.The Local Agency has the right to correct any deficiencies in a timely manner and resubmit the Work for inspection and approval. I.Liability: UDOT and the Local Agency are both governmental entities subject to the Governmental Immunity Act.Each party agrees to indemnify,defend and save harmless the other party from any and all damages,claims, suits,costs,attorney’s fees and actions arising from or related to its actions or omissions or the acts or omissions of its officers,agents,or employees in connection with the performance and/or subject matter of this Agreement.The obligation to indemnify is limited to the dollar amounts set forth in the Governmental Immunity Act,provided said Act applies to the action or omission giving rise to the protections of this paragraph.This paragraph shall not be construed as a waiver of the protections of the Governmental Immunity Act by the parties.The indemnification in this paragraph shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. II.Termination: This Agreement may be terminated as follows: a.By mutual agreement of the parties,in writing b.By either UDOT or the Local Agency for failure of the other party to fulfill their obligations as set forth in the provisions of this Agreement.Reasonable allowances will be made for circumstances beyond the control of the parties.Written notice of intent to terminate is required and shall specify the reasons for termination.If a party fails to cure the breach,the other party may terminate this Agreement. c.By UDOT for the convenience of the State upon written notice to the Local Agency. However,UDOT will be responsible for the costs incurred for the Work before the termination of the Agreement. III.Maintenance: The City of Moab will maintain the parking structure in perpetuity. IV. Payment and Reimbursement to Local Agency: UDOT will pay the lump sum within 30 days from the execution of the agreement by both parties. V. Change in Scope and Schedule: If Work scope or schedule changes from the original intent of this Agreement,UDOT will notify the Local Agency prior to changes being made.If the Local Agency modifies its Project and the modification affects the Work,Local Agency will immediately notify UDOT.In the event there are changes in the scope of the Work,extra work,or changes in the planned Work covered by this Agreement,a modification to this Agreement must be approved in writing by the parties prior to the start of work on the changes or additions. VI. Environmental Compliance The Local Agency will assure compliance of the Project with all applicable state and federal environmental statutes,regulations,rules,and permitting requirements. VII. Miscellaneous: 3 of 3 Contingency Paying Coop (Local Preforming Work) Feb. 17, 2016 5/9/2019 Each party agrees to undertake and perform all further acts that are reasonably necessary to carry out the intent and purposes of the Agreement at the request of the other party. The failure of either party to insist upon strict compliance of any of the terms and conditions, or failure or delay by either party to exercise any rights or remedies provided in this Agreement, or by law,will not release either party from any obligations arising under this Agreement. This Agreement does not create any type of agency relationship,joint venture or partnership between the parties. Each party represents that it has the authority to enter into this Agreement. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts by the parties. VIII. Content Review: Language content was reviewed and approved by the Utah AG’s office on February 2, 2015. Local Entity Utah Department of Transportation Region 4 By Date By Date By Date By Date Title/Signature of additional official if required Rick Torgerson, Region Director By Date By Date Title/Signature of additional official if required Comptrollers Office Moab City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: May 14, 2019 Title: Resolution #32-2019: A Resolution Approving a Hillside Development Permit Legacy Design Group for Commercial Development on Property Located at 1520 North Main Street in the RC, Resort Commercial Zone, as Referred to City Council by the Planning Commission Disposition: Discussion and possible action Staff Presenter: Planning and Engineering Departments Attachment(s): -Attachment 1: Proposed Resolution #32-2019 -Attachment 2: Moab Municipal Code Chapter 17.55 -Attachment 3: Contour Maps -Attachment 4: Slope Study -Attachment 5: Site Layout Recommended Motion: I move to adopt Resolution #32-2019 approving a Hillside Development Permit for a major development on property located at 1520 North Main Street Background/Summary: An application for this Hillside Development permit was received from Mr. Craig Larsen with Legacy Design Group on October 23, 2018. The first review by the Development Review Team (DRT) resulted in an extensive list of comments primarily from the Engineering Department. Legacy Design Group met with City Planning and Engineering staff on December 12, 2018 and worked through a number of the engineering comments. The applicants has provided additional information and all permit review criteria have been addressed. Note that a separate site plan must be reviewed and approved subsequent to the approval of a Hillside Development Permit, and that this development is subject to the Assured Workforce Housing section of Moab Municipal Code (Chapter 17.69). The applicant must execute a Land Use Restriction Agreement with the City Council prior to the issuance of a building permit. Applicable Code: Chapter 17.55 HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENTS CITY OF MOAB RESOLUTION NO. 32-2019 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR LEGACY DESIGN GROUP FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1520 NORTH MAIN STREET IN THE RC, RESORT COMMERCIAL ZONE, AS REFERRED TO CITY COUNCIL BY THE PLANNING COMMMISSION The following describe the intent and purpose of this resolution: a.My Thirty Five One, LLC, PO Box 1692, Bountiful, Utah, 84011-1692, as the Owner of record (“Owner”) of property located at 1520 North Main Street has applied through their agent, Legacy Design Group, Craig Larsen, President, with offices at PO Box 1692, Bountiful, Utah, 84011- 1692, for a hillside development permit; and b.Applicant has furnished the following legal description of the property located at 1520 North Main Street, Moab Utah, 84532, more particularly described as: BEG AT COR ON N R/W OF US HWY 191 SAID COR BEARS N 38°53'E 803.7 FT FROM S¼ COR SEC 26 T25S R21E SLB&M & PROC WITH SAID R/W N 47°40'W 697.9 FT; N 0°05'E 223.1 FT; S 89°54'E 717.3 FT; S 9°15'E 366.6 FT; S 38°18'W 420.5 FT TO POB LESS BEG AT THE N'LY R/W OF US HWY 191 SAID COR BEARS N 38°53'E 803.7 FT FROM THE S¼ COR SEC 26 T25S R21E SLMB AND PROCEEDING THENCE N 16°15'E 720.6 FT; THENCE S 9°15'E 366.6 FT; THENCE S 38°18'W 420.5 FT TO THE POB AND CONT 7.02 ACRES M-O-L c.The City adopted the Hillside Development regulations in order to promote the health, safety and the general public welfare of the residents of the City by establishing standards for the development and excavation of hillside and slope areas so as to minimize soil and slope instability and erosion and to preserve the visual and aesthetic character of the surrounding hillsides; and, d.The Moab Planning Commission reviewed the application for a hillside development permit for commercial development on property located at 1520 North Main Street in a regularly scheduled meeting held on February 14, 2019 and April 11, 2019, and subsequently adopted Planning Resolution #04-2019, subsequent to said public meeting, and recommends that Council approve the Hillside Development Permit with certain requirements; and, e.The Moab City Council reviewed the application and considered the Planning Commission and Staff recommendations in a public meeting held on May 14, 2019; and f.Following the consideration of the technical aspects of the pertinent code sections, the Moab City Council, pursuant to Resolution #32-2019, hereby finds, that all applicable provisions of the Moab Municipal Code have or can be met. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MOAB CITY COUNCIL, the Hillside Development Permit for commercial development of the above described parcel is hereby APPROVED with the following conditions: 1.A separate site plan must be reviewed and approved upon approval of a Hillside Development permit. 2.Development is subject to the Assured Workforce Housing Ordinance and must execute a Land Use Restriction Agreement with the City Council prior to the issuance of a building permit. PASSED AND APPROVED in open Council by a majority vote of the Governing Body of Moab City Council on _______ __, 2019. SIGNED: ________________________________ Emily Niehaus, Mayor ATTEST: ________________________________ Sommar Johnson, Recorder 17.55.010 17.55.020 17.55.030 17.55.040 17.55.050 17.55.060 17.55.070 17.55.080 17.55.090 17.55.100 17.55.110 17.55.120 17.55.130 17.55.140 17.55.150 Chapter 17.55 HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENTS Sections: Purpose. Definitions. Areas subject to these provisions. Hillside development density standards. Determination of slope and slope areas. Hillside development permit required. Application submittals. Improvements security and restoration bond. Building setbacks, height, and construction materials. Appeals to the appeal authority. Verification of compliance. Penalty for violation. Permit review criteria. Application fees. Severability. 17.55.010 Purpose. The City finds that the health, safety and the general public welfare of the residents of the City will be promoted by establishing standards for the development and excavation of hillside and slope areas located in the City so as to minimize soil and slope instability and erosion and the negative effects associated with construction in geologic hazard zones. In addition the City finds that the preservation of the visual and aesthetic character of the City’s hillsides is an important public goal. The provisions herein are intended to supplement and amplify the City subdivision and zoning ordinances and are designed to accomplish the following: A. Prohibit development of uses which would likely result in a hazardous situation due to slope instability, rock falls, or excessive erosion; B. Provide for safe vehicular circulation and access; C. Encourage the location, design and development of building sites in a manner that will minimize the scarring and erosion effects of cutting, filling and grading of hillsides; D. Encourage preservation of open space by encouraging clusters or other design techniques to preserve the natural terrain; Ch. 17.55 Hillside Developments | Moab Municipal Code Page 1 of 12 The Moab Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 18-22, passed December 11, 2018. E. Where hillside excavation does occur, require that buildings be located in the cut area to minimize the visual effects of scarring. (Ord. 97-12 (part), 1997: Ord. 96-18 § 2 (part), 1996) 17.55.020 Definitions. For the purposes of this chapter, the following words and phrases shall have the following meanings: “Cut” means land surface which is re-shaped by man through the removal of soil, rock, or other materials. “Development” means the carrying out of any building activity or clearing of land as an adjunct of construction. “Development parcel” means any quantity of land capable of being described with such definiteness that its location and boundaries may be established, which is designated by its owner or developer as land to be used or developed as a unit or which has been used or developed as a unit. “Excavation” means any disturbance to the ground including but not limited to clearing, grubbing, rock removal, cutting, tunneling, drilling, or any other activity which alters the natural ground. “Fill” means the deposit of soil, rock, or other materials placed by man. “Geotechnical engineer” means a person with a four-year degree in civil engineering or engineering geology from an accredited university who is licensed as an engineer and who, through training and experience, is able to assure that geological factors affecting engineering works are recognized, adequately interpreted, and presented for use in engineering practice and for the protection of the public. “Ledge” means the first substantial abrupt change in slope along the top edge of a plateau or ridge line. “Major development” means and includes any building activity or clearing of land adjunct to construction involving subdivision of land into three or more lots; the construction of multifamily housing such as condominiums or townhouses containing three or more residential units; any residential or commercial construction which involves excavation of a surface area larger than one acre; or any excavation creating a vertical cut into a slope greater than four feet in height. “Minor development” means and includes any building activity or clearing of land adjunct to construction involving less than three lots; construction of multifamily housing such as condominiums or townhouses containing less than three residential units; residential or commercial construction which involves excavation of a surface area of one acre or less; or any excavation creating a vertical cut into a slope four feet or less in height. “Plateau” means a flat or predominantly flat area of land which is raised sharply above adjacent land on at least one side as illustrated in Exhibit D and designated on ridge line map attached to the ordinance codified in this chapter and on file in the City Recorder’s office. “Ridge line” means the junction of a rising steep slope on one side and a descending slope that may either be gentle or steep on the other side. Ch. 17.55 Hillside Developments | Moab Municipal Code Page 2 of 12 The Moab Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 18-22, passed December 11, 2018.  Setback means an area, measured as a distance from a property line or geologic boundary, in which no structure or building is allowed to be constructed.  Slope means a vertical rise measured over a horizontal distance, expressed as a percentage, measured generally at right angles to contour lines. (Ord. 97-12 (part), 1997: Ord. 96-18 � 2 (part), 1996) 17.55.030 Areas subject to these provisions. Property within the City limits with slopes greater than fifteen percent. (Ord. 97-12 (part), 1997: Ord. 96-18 � 2 (part), 1996) 17.55.040 Hillside development density standards. A. Lot size, density and site disturbance for development in lands subject to this chapter shall comply with the density schedule in this section. To the extent this density schedule is contrary to existing zoning standards the provisions of this section shall take precedence. B. Any portion of a development parcel having a slope greater than forty-five percent shall not be included in the calculation of the area of such parcel for the purposes of determining conformity with the minimum lot parcel size and density requirements in this section. C. Where more than two-thirds of a single family lot has a slope of twenty-five percent or less, the entire lot shall be considered as having less than twenty-five percent slope for the purpose of determining lot size. D. Density standards: Percent Natural Slope Dwelling Units/Acre 1-25% No change in density 26-39% One d.u./acre provided the units are clustered in 30% or less of land area within this slope category. 70% of the land area of this slope category shall remain undisturbed. 40-45% One d.u. per 20 acres 46% + Development not permitted E. A density bonus shall be available for development that transfers dwelling units from lands with a slope of twenty-six percent to thirty-nine percent to areas with a slope of twenty-five percent or less, either within the same parcel or to an adjacent parcel under the same ownership. Ch. 17.55 Hillside Developments | Moab Municipal Code Page 3 of 12 The Moab Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 18-22, passed December 11, 2018. 1. Any person transferring dwelling units as specified in subsection E of this section shall be entitled to a transfer density bonus of 0.75 dwelling units. F. No development shall be permitted upon lots with an average slope of forty-six percent or more. G. Where commercial rather than residential development is contemplated, density shall be calculated on the basis of each three thousand square foot increment of building construction being equivalent to one dwelling unit. (Ord. 97-12 (part), 1997: Ord. 96-18 § 2 (part), 1996) 17.55.050 Determination of slope and slope areas. A. Slope shall be determined on an individual basis as an average percent natural slope for purposes of density limitations. B. The contour interval maps and calculations required by this section shall be prepared in a report by a professional civil engineer or licensed surveyor and shall be submitted with applications for permits or subdivision approvals for lands subject to this chapter. Each report shall bear the certification of the engineer or surveyor as to the accuracy of the report. C. The location of the natural fifteen percent, twenty-five percent, forty percent and forty-five percent slopes for the purposes of this chapter shall be determined using the following procedure: 1. Preparation of Contour Maps. Current contour maps shall be prepared and certified by a licensed engineer or surveyor showing contours at intervals no greater than five feet (the “contour map”) drawn at one inch equals two hundred feet scale maximum. 2. Verification Through Field Surveys. Field surveys may be required of the applicant by the City engineer or city planner to verify the accuracy of the contour lines shown on the contour map. The contour map shall identify profile lines which shall be used to verify the field survey. Profile lines shall be perpendicular to contour lines and in no case occur at intervals greater than one hundred fifty feet apart or seventy-five feet from a property line. 3. Determination of Slope Areas for Density Calculations. Using the contour maps, slopes shall be calculated in intervals no greater than forty to eighty feet along profile lines. Points identified as slopes of fifteen percent, twenty-five percent, forty percent and forty-five percent shall be located on the contour map and connected by a continuous line. That area bounded by said lines and intersecting property lines shall be used for determining dwelling unit density. (Ord. 97-12 (part), 1997: Ord. 96-18 § 2 (part), 1996) 17.55.060 Hillside development permit required. A. All major development on slopes in excess of fifteen percent shall require a hillside development permit granted by the City Council prior to any excavation or construction activity. The Planning Commission shall first review proposed development and make a recommendation to the City Council. Ch. 17.55 Hillside Developments | Moab Municipal Code Page 4 of 12 The Moab Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 18-22, passed December 11, 2018. B. All minor development on slopes greater than fifteen percent shall require a hillside development permit granted by the City Council prior to any excavation or construction activity. The Planning Commission shall first review the proposed development and make a recommendation to the City Council. C. Government Exemptions. Exemptions to this chapter may be granted to government agencies under the following guidelines. Proposed development by the City of Moab and other government agencies, are required to submit the appropriate documentation as established in Section 17.55.070. The application shall be submitted to city staff for review and recommendation to the City Council. Subsequent to review of the proposed project by staff, City Council shall evaluate the project at the next available meeting. In granting an exemption, the City Council may prescribe appropriate reasonable conditions and safeguards to ensure compliance with the requirements of the Moab land development regulations. Exemptions apply to necessary development of various public works and community development projects including, but are not limited to, flood control structures such as dams and retaining walls, water tanks and water conveyance systems, and structures such as bridges, parking areas, and roadways for transportation projects. In the application of this section, Council shall have the authority to grant exemptions to any of the requirements of this chapter by applying the following review criteria: 1. The establishment, maintenance or operation of the proposed exemption is not detrimental or injurious to the use and enjoyment of existing uses on adjacent properties; 2. The establishment, maintenance or operation of the proposed special exception use or structure will not cause traffic hazards in the vicinity; 3. Adequate provision is made for surface water drainage, ingress and egress to the property, and off-street parking; 4. Adequate public facilities and services are available for the proposed special exception use or structure; 5. The application meets all special requirements as detailed within the zoning ordinance for the specific special exception if any apply; 6. The use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare; 7. The location, nature and height of each building, wall and fence, the nature and extent of landscaping on the site and the location, size, nature, and intensity of each phase of the use and its access streets will be compatible with the appropriate and orderly development of the district in which it is located; 8. The proposed use will not conflict with an existing or programmed public facility, public service, school, or road; 9. The proposed use has the written recommendations and comments of the public works and engineering departments; 10. The applicant has presented sufficient evidence of public need for the use. Ch. 17.55 Hillside Developments | Moab Municipal Code Page 5 of 12 The Moab Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 18-22, passed December 11, 2018. D. Permit approval under this section shall not be required for preliminary plats that have been approved by the City Council prior to the adoption of the ordinance codified in this chapter. E. Upon review of a permit application for either major or minor development the Planning Commission may, in addition to recommending approval or denial of the application, submit to the City Council recommendations as to conditions to be attached to the permit to mitigate specific adverse impacts associated with the application. F. The City Council may approve the application as submitted; approve subject to conditions; or deny the permit in full where the development does not meet the standards of this chapter or other provisions of the Municipal Code. (Ord. 10-01, 2010) Editor’s note: Ord. No. 10-01, adopted February 23, 2010, repealed the former § 17.55.060, and enacted a new § 17.55.060 as set out herein. The former 17.55.060 pertained to similar subject matter and derived from Ord. No. 96-18, 1996 and Ord. No. 97-12, 1997. 17.55.070 Application submittals. A. Any applicant for a major development on slopes greater than twenty-five percent, shall be required to submit the following technical information and reports: 1. Contour maps as provided in this section; site development plan (subsection C1); grading plan (C2); drainage control plan and report (C3); geology and soils report (C4); landscape plan (C5); other reports as required by city staff (C6); and evidence of title (C7). B. Any application for a minor development on slopes greater than twenty-five percent, shall be required to submit the following technical information and reports: 1. Contour maps as provided in this section; site development plan (C1); grading plan (C2); geology and soils report (C4); and other reports as required by city staff (C6); and evidence of title (C7). C. Submittals under this chapter shall contain the following: 1. Site Development Plans. A scaled site development drawing or plans prepared by a licensed engineer, licensed architect, or licensed surveyor containing: a. The proposed location and description of all buildings or structures; b. The proposed location and description of all landscaping, irrigation structures, and related structures; c. The proposed location and description of all public and private roads or driveways, street lighting, drainage structures, water, sewer, and gas lines, electric and telephone lines and related utilities; d. All property lines, new lot lines, existing and proposed easements, and areas dedicated to open space; Ch. 17.55 Hillside Developments | Moab Municipal Code Page 6 of 12 The Moab Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 18-22, passed December 11, 2018. e. All other submittals otherwise required for development under the Municipal Code for lands not subject to this chapter. 2. Grading Plan. A grading and earth moving plan conforming with all requirements of Appendix Chapter 33 of the Uniform Building Code and showing existing and proposed contours and cross-sections. The grading plan shall show accurate slope conditions and contours for lands extending no less than one hundred feet outside of the application boundaries. The grading plan shall additionally show: a. Detailed excavation drawings showing the location and extent of all hillside cuts and fills and all excavations for structures, utilities, or roads, including a description of all methods to be employed for excavation and fill disposal; b. A time-table providing a schedule for all grading and construction work with starting and ending dates; c. Specific restoration and mitigation techniques to be employed by the developer for cut and fill areas. 3. Drainage Control Plan and Report. A drainage control plan and report prepared by a licensed civil engineer and containing a site specific evaluation of drainage issues for the site and drainage control problems generated by the proposed development, including: a. Detailed plans of all surface and subsurface drainage systems and facilities, retaining walls, cribbing or other drainage or erosion protection devices, to be constructed in connection with, or as part of the proposed project; b. A map showing the drainage area and estimated runoff calculations for the area served by any drainage systems or facilities. 4. Geology and Soils Report. A geology and soils report shall be prepared by a licensed engineer trained and experienced in the practice of geotechnical engineering, and shall contain at least the following information: a. Slope stability analysis: conclusions and recommendations concerning the effects of material removal, introduction of water, both on and offsite, including, where applicable, on mesa tops, seismic activity, and erosion on slope stability; b. Foundation investigation: conclusions and recommendations concerning the effects of soil conditions on foundation and structural stability, including bearing capacity, sheer strength, and shrink/swell potential of soils; c. The location and yield of springs, seeps and wetlands which shall be shown on the site plan; d. Structural features, including any geological hazards such as rock falls, ravines, overhangs, cliff faces or the like; e. Conclusions and recommendations regarding the effect of geologic conditions on the proposed development, together with recommendations identifying the means proposed to minimize any hazard to life or property, or adverse impact on the natural environment. Ch. 17.55 Hillside Developments | Moab Municipal Code Page 7 of 12 The Moab Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 18-22, passed December 11, 2018. 5. Landscape and Vegetation Plan. A landscape plan shall address all existing and proposed landscaping for the development site. It shall address: a. Vegetative or other screening in areas of high visual impact and the specific plantings to be installed by the developer, including plantings needed for restoration of cut and fill areas; b. Irrigation for all plantings; c. Buffering the development from adjoining parcels and any other site specific vegetation issues. 6. Other Information. Other reports, plans, and information as may be deemed necessary by the City staff or Planning Commission may be required with the application as a condition of the application process. 7. Evidence of Title. A current legal description for the property subject to the application including a copy of the current deed evidencing title in the applicant and a current title insurance commitment and/or abstract of title. (Ord. 97-12 (part), 1997: Ord. 96-18 § 2 (part), 1996) 17.55.080 Improvements security and restoration bond. A. The City may require, as a condition for issuance of any hillside development permit or grading permit, that the applicant post adequate security to assure compliance with all permit conditions, including restoration, soil stabilization, landscaping, drainage improvements, or any other permit condition. Any security required by this section shall be an amount, as determined in the discretion of city staff, reasonably calculated to cover anticipated costs for improvements required under the permit and may take the form of the following: 1. A surety bond or letter of credit naming the City of Moab as beneficiary or payee; 2. A certified or cashier’s check payable to the City of Moab and held in an escrow account; 3. An improvements agreement specifying all improvements and permit conditions shall be completed prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy or building permit for individual lots. B. In the event the applicant fails to complete development in accordance with the permit conditions within one year from the issuance of the permit the City, upon delivering written notice to the applicant, may proceed to redeem any funds payable to it under this section for the purposes of obtaining completion of the required improvements. 1. For good cause shown, the City Council, after receiving the recommendation of the Planning Commission, may grant such additional time extension as may be necessary to allow compliance by the applicant with all restoration or improvement conditions of the permit. C. Where a project is to be completed in phases according to a phasing plan, the applicant can secure a proportionate partial release of any improvements security upon certification by the Zoning Administrator that all permit conditions have been complied with as to that particular phase. (Ord. 97-12 (part), 1997: Ord. 96-18 § 2 (part), 1996) Ch. 17.55 Hillside Developments | Moab Municipal Code Page 8 of 12 The Moab Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 18-22, passed December 11, 2018. 17.55.090 Building setbacks, height, and construction materials. A. Where a ridge line or ledge occurs, the minimum setback shall be one hundred feet measured normal (perpendicular) to the closest point of the ridge, unless a greater setback is recommended in the geotechnical report. The Planning Commission may recommend a lesser setback where the applicant can demonstrate that the one hundred foot setback makes the property unbuildable. B. All buildings constructed upon lands subject to this chapter shall be one story only, or twenty feet maximum, in height. Height shall be measured as described in Section 17.55.020, definitions. C. Buildings constructed upon lands subject to this chapter shall be constructed with materials appropriate to mitigate significant visual impacts. Wherever possible, buildings should be constructed of materials that closely resemble and blend in with native vegetation and hillside features. (Ord. 10-01, 2010; Ord. 97-12 (part), 1997: Ord. 96-18 § 2 (part), 1996) 17.55.100 Appeals to the appeal authority. The appeal authority shall hear any appeal from staff action; request for variance; or appeal regarding the grant, denial, or conditions attached to any permit under this chapter. (Ord. 10-14, 2010; Ord. 97-12 (part), 1997: Ord. 96-18 § 2 (part), 1996) 17.55.110 Verification of compliance. Compliance with all permit conditions shall be verified by the Zoning Administrator. Restoration bonds or other security shall not be released, and certificates of occupancy or building permits shall be withheld for such a development until such time as the Zoning Administrator shall certify compliance. (Ord. 97-12 (part), 1997: Ord. 96-18 § 2 (part), 1996) 17.55.120 Penalty for violation. In addition to those penalties prescribed in Chapter 17.75 of this title, the City staff shall have the right to order a halt to construction of any improvements where, in his/her discretion, there exists a condition which violates or threatens to violate any of the provisions of this chapter. Such suspension of construction activities shall continue until the City Public Works Director or Zoning Administrator is satisfied that measures have been implemented for substantial compliance with this chapter. (Ord. 97-12 (part), 1997: Ord. 96-18 § 2 (part), 1996) Ch. 17.55 Hillside Developments | Moab Municipal Code Page 9 of 12 The Moab Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 18-22, passed December 11, 2018. 17.55.130 Permit review criteria. A. Any permit application under this section shall be reviewed to determine compliance with the following criteria: 1. Compliance with setback, lot area, density, and height limitations contained in this chapter; 2. Compliance with comprehensive plan goals for the area including the development site, including all other Municipal Code provisions; 3. The compatibility of the proposed development with existing land uses in the immediate vicinity of the project site, including aesthetic concerns and visual impacts; 4. Adequacy of the vegetation and landscaping plans, including restoration, vegetative screening, regrading and irrigation; 5. Geotechnical suitability of the development and the potential for geologic hazards to persons or property, whether natural or man-made, including erosion, rockfall, stormwater runoff, or similar concerns; 6. The availability of adequate municipal services, including police and fire protection, schools, culinary water, sanitary sewer service, or the like; 7. Suitability of the proposed drainage and reclamation plans, including the extent to which the design meets the following specific engineering standards: a. The height of any cut or fill shall not exceed ten feet when measured vertically from the finished grade to the intersection of the slope with the natural undisturbed ground. The combined height of cuts and fill shall not exceed twenty feet unless otherwise approved by the Planning Commission and the City Council. Approval is subject to incorporating, retaining, terracing, and landscaping or other approved techniques for stabilizing cuts and fills. All excavation and fills shall conform to Appendix Chapter 33 of the Uniform Building Code. b. All drainage systems shall be separate and independent from the sanitary sewer system. c. Drainage and flood control shall be designed in conformance with the City flood control master plan where applicable. d. Property development shall not cause a natural drainage channel to be filled in, obstructed, or diverted. When modification to a natural drainage channel is proposed within the development, such changes will be addressed in the drainage study and shown on the improvement plans, and the developer may be required to dedicate right-of-way or record drainage easements for structures and/or improvements needed to carry storm runoff in the event approval is given for the proposed modifications. e. The point of location where the natural drainage channel enters and leaves the property may not be changed without the approval of the City engineer. Ch. 17.55 Hillside Developments | Moab Municipal Code Page 10 of 12 The Moab Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 18-22, passed December 11, 2018. f. All of the drainage basin upstream of the development shall be considered to be fully developed in conformance with the City’s current land use master plan. Effects on the downstream property owners relative to increased flood potential and nuisance water shall also be considered in the design, including acquisition of easements or agreements where necessary, or construction or modification of improvements where needed. g. The applicant shall provide the necessary means to assure drainage within the property being developed by making use of existing facilities or natural washes and constructing master planned improvements. h. It shall be required that each new development handle its stormwater runoff in such a manner that no net increase in storm runoff above the natural state will occur on the downstream properties. Pre- project flows must not be exceeded by the post-project flows. i. Projects shall be designed to provide that stormwater from a one hundred year frequency storm shall be adequately conveyed either within the limits of the street right-of-way or in storm drain easement without creating flood hazards to dwellings. j. When an underground pipe system is required, it shall be designed to carry a ten year storm. Major hydraulic structures shall be designed to carry a twenty-five year storm. The minimum storm drain size shall be ten inches. k. Unless specifically permitted, retention basins on hillsides shall not be allowed. l. Detention shall be allowed where it is compatible with all required reports. Detention basins shall be used for the purpose of eliminating the effects of the peak runoff of storms and releasing water flow at the pre-project, or approved rate. m. Cross-gutter drains on streets shall be avoided whenever possible. They shall not be allowed on collector and higher order streets. n. Drainage design must be constructed in accordance with accepted engineering standards and must be consistent with data in other reports such as soils, landscaping, and the like. o. All buildings shall be constructed outside the limits of and eighteen inches above the two hundred year flood stage except on drainages subject to FEMA flood control regulations, in which case construction shall be no less than two feet from any such flood line. p. Necessary measures shall be taken to prevent erosion and scour at all points throughout the development. Erosion shall be mitigated at all points of discharge and at the face of any cut or fill slope throughout the development. q. During grading or construction on any property (including off-site construction) the developer shall control both water used for construction and storm runoff in such a manner as to not affect any adjoining properties, nor add silt or debris to any existing storm drain, wash, channel or roadway. Ch. 17.55 Hillside Developments | Moab Municipal Code Page 11 of 12 The Moab Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 18-22, passed December 11, 2018. The Moab Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 18-22, passed December 11, 2018. Disclaimer: The City Recorder's Office has the official version of the Moab Municipal Code. Users should contact the City Recorder's Office for ordinances passed subsequent to the ordinance cited above. City Website: moabcity.org City Telephone: (435) 259-5121 Code Publishing Company r. Applications shall be evaluated for compliance with applicable state and federal environmental statutes and regulations promulgated thereunder, including, but not limited to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. (Ord. 97-12 (part), 1997: Ord. 96-18 § 2 (part), 1996) 17.55.140 Application fees. An applicant for a hillside development permit shall submit an application fee as established by resolution with the completed application. No action shall be taken on any application for a hillside development permit without payment of the proper application fee. (Ord. 06-11 (part), 2006: Ord. 97-12 (part), 1997: Ord. 96-18 § 2 (part), 1996) 17.55.150 Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this chapter is, for any reason, held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision, and such holding shall not effect the validity of the remaining portions of this chapter. (Ord. 97-12 (part), 1997: Ord. 96-18 § 2 (part), 1996) Ch. 17.55 Hillside Developments | Moab Municipal Code Page 12 of 12 The Moab Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 18-22, passed December 11, 2018. CUT/FILL LEGEND0SCALE( FT )4080120LEGEND:© 2019 BY LEGACY DESIGN GROUP, LLC;DRAWING NOT TO BE REUSED IN WHOLE ORIN PART WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSIONLEGACY DESIGN GROUPABERDEEN, SDSALT LAKE CITY, UT605.725.52573HILLSIDE DEVEOPMENT: SITE LAYOUT W/CONTOURS 1520 N. MAIN STREET (HWY 191), MOAB, UTHOLIDAYINNFORMERWATER PARKHWY 191PROPOSED HIGHWAYIMPROVEMENTS BY UDOT4/4/2019 0SCALE( FT )4080120LEGEND:© 2019 BY LEGACY DESIGN GROUP, LLC;DRAWING NOT TO BE REUSED IN WHOLE ORIN PART WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSIONLEGACY DESIGN GROUPABERDEEN, SDSALT LAKE CITY, UT605.725.52572HILLSIDE DEVEOPMENT: SITE LAYOUT W/SLOPE STUDY 1520 N. MAIN STREET (HWY 191), MOAB, UTHOLIDAYINNFORMERWATER PARKHWY 191PROPOSED HIGHWAYIMPROVEMENTS BY UDOT4/4/2019 0SCALE( FT )4080120SITE NOTES:·LOT SIZE: 7.02 ac.·NATURAL AVG. SLOPE: 27%LEGEND:© 2019 BY LEGACY DESIGN GROUP, LLC;DRAWING NOT TO BE REUSED IN WHOLE ORIN PART WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSIONLEGACY DESIGN GROUPABERDEEN, SDSALT LAKE CITY, UT605.725.52571HILLSIDE DEVEOPMENT: SLOPE STUDY 1520 N. MAIN STREET (HWY 191), MOAB, UTABCDEFGHIJKLMNO PHOLIDAYINNFORMERWATER PARKHWY 191SLOPE ALIGNMENT TITLES, SEEALIGNMENT PROFILES ONSHEETS 4 & 5 (TYP.)PROPOSED HIGHWAYIMPROVEMENTS BY UDOT4/4/2019 Moab City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: May 14, 2019 Title: Resolution #31-2019: A Resolution Approving the Millcreek Corner Subdivision, a Minor Subdivision at 808 Millcreek Drive located in the R-2, Single-household and Two-household Residential Zone, as Referred to City Council by the Planning Commission Disposition: Discussion and possible action Staff Presenter: Planning Department Attachment(s): -Attachment 1: Proposed Resolution #31-2019 -Attachment 2: Millcreek Corner Final Plat -Attachment 3: Aerial Recommended Motion: I move to adopt Resolution #31-2019 approving the Final Plat for Millcreek Corner Subdivision. Background/Summary: This proposed four lot minor subdivision will split the property located at 808 Millcreek Drive into two single-household lots and a twin-home lot. Lot 1 will be a flag-shaped lot and consists of 6,607 square feet (.15 acre). Lot 2a will be 3,779 square feet (.09 acres) and Lot 2b will be 4,828 square feet (.11 acres) in area. Lot 3 will be 6,291 square feet (.14 acres) in area. Access to the lots will be from Mill Creek Drive and two off-street parking spaces will be provided for each dwelling. Building permits will not be issued until all outstanding Engineering Department concerns have been addressed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Applicable Code Moab Municipal Code Chapter 16.08.020, Exceptions--Final plat, is applicable to this subdivision and allows final plats to be approved without a public hearing under specific circumstances. The text reads, “In subdivisions of less than five lots, land may be sold after recording of a plat, if all the following conditions are met: A. The subdivision plan shall have been approved by the Planning Commission, the planning coordinator, the City engineer, the City Attorney, other agencies the zoning administrator deems necessary, and the City Council; B. The subdivision is not traversed by lines of a proposed street, and does not require the dedication of any land for street or other purposes; C. Each lot within the subdivision meets the frontage width and area requirements of the zoning title or has been granted a variance from such requirements by the appeal authority; D. All final plat requirements shall be complied with; E. All provisions of Chapter 16.20 of this title shall be complied with; and F. The water supply and sewage disposal shall have been approved by the utility supervisor. “ Staff responses to the standards for this type of application are as follows: A. This review by the Planning Commission is the final step prior to the application being referred to City Council; B. Dedication of property for additional public street right-of-way is not necessary and this property is not traversed by a street; C. The lots satisfy the dimensional requirements for the R-2 Zone; D. The requirements for final plats will be completely satisfied with approval by the Planning Commission and the City Council; E. Chapter 16.20 lists the Required Improvements that a subdivision must meet and those include sewers and sewerage facilities, storm water drainage conveyance and management, and street and drinking water improvements. These improvements currently exist for the surrounding development and can be easily provided to the property. F. As stated above, the utilities currently exist and are adjacent to the subject property and were approved during the construction of Sunrise Hills Subdivision. Staff recommends approval of the final plat. CITY OF MOAB RESOLUTION NO. 31-2019 A RESOLUTION CONDITIONALLY APPROVING THE MILLCREEK CORNER SUBDIVISION, A MINOR SUBDIVISION OF 808 MILLCREEK DRIVE LOCATED IN THE R-2, RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT, AS REFERRED TO COUNCIL BY THE PLANNING COMMMISSION The following describe the intent and purpose of this resolution: a.Rikki Epperson (Applicant) of Community Rebuilds, with offices located at 150 South 200 East, Moab, Utah 84532, as Owner of 808 Millcreek Drive, a .49 acre lot in Moab, Utah; and b.Applicant submitted to the City of Moab the appropriate application and documents for review and approval of the proposed two-lot minor subdivision as required in MMC Chapter 16.08.020; and c.The property is located in the R-2 Residential Zone and the proposed residential uses are allowed as established in MMC 17.45.020; and d.Owner desires to subdivide the .49 acre (21,505 square feet) into Lot 1 with 6,607 square feet, Lot 2a with 3,779 square feet (.09 acres), Lot 2b with 4,828 square feet (.11 acres), and Lot 3 with 6,291 square feet (.14 acres) in order to construct two single-household dwellings and a twin home; and e.The proposed lots satisfy the dimensional requirements of the R-2 Zone; and f.The Moab Planning Commission reviewed the application for the Millcreek Corner Subdivision in a regularly scheduled meeting held on March 28, 2019, to review the application and subsequently adopted Planning Resolution #09-2019, recommending approval to the City Council in accordance with MMC Chapter 16.08.020 that allows a minor subdivision of less than five (5) lots to be reviewed without a public hearing; and g.The Moab City Council reviewed the application and considered the Planning Commission and Staff recommendations in a public meeting held on May 14, 2019; and h.Following the consideration of the technical aspects of the pertinent code sections, the Moab City Council, pursuant to Resolution #31-2019, hereby finds, that the subdivision can meet or exceeds the pertinent code requirements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MOAB CITY COUNCIL, the application for the Millcreek Corner Minor Subdivision is hereby APPROVED with the following condition: 1.Building permits will not be issued until all outstanding Engineering Department concerns have been addressed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. PASSED AND APPROVED in open Council by a majority vote of the Governing Body of Moab City Council on _______ __, 2019. SIGNED: ________________________________ Emily Niehaus, Mayor ATTEST: ________________________________ Sommar Johnson, Recorder i Sundial Dr f� i d41‘1 sab Charter School Bowers Circle 1 Locmt Ln a o it FDueblo Ct o vies a r St ~ Corner a. ,pveridrge Market "Q oak St Oak St MrR C .e4D Grand Valley Cemetery &hill Creek Dr 5a.+° Fla'sR° H°ta Pork Niva Dr pea°ac,,P°ROECT A.d Nk"°r °"'''' SITE Kachina Way r t4rai?,, Raspberry Dr c c a � nard'N'}' pear Tree Ln Pear Tref V. C0An,yc i °4 � n g s 191 Minor Ct KFvmishln�nouAes Home Bi the Ln WarFser Ave Quality Inn Moab , Slickrock Area .� VICINITY MAP (N.T S. ) 10.0' GROFF 01-007-0026 ,00'8 1,1. 3 „003Zo00 N ON_ S 88°14'00" E 66.90' O 20.101' 10' WIDE UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT LEGEND GRAPHIC SCALE 20 0 10 20 40 MILLCREEK DRIVE S 88°14'00" E 36.00' 0 46.89' ., 16.80' I i_- ----- -- - -- W 20' WIDE SHARED ACCESS EASEMENT LOT 2A 3779 Sq. Ft. 0.09 Acres 49.9/, N 76.39,09„ LOT 1 6607 Sq. Ft. 0.15 Acres 4.38, QQ Property Corner ® Found Property Corner Section Corner Monument Quarter Section Corner in 1 R. O 1 O \I co 'co O Z M N S 83°39'09" E M 7.54' 19.20' 1" (INCH) = 20' (FEET) S 81 ° 15'00" E 8.20' A= 55.46' R= 47.00' CB= S 48°58'00" E CL= 52.30' 10' WIDE UTILITY Nj EASEMENT \ LOT 2B 4828 Sq. Ft. 0.11 Acres •5. 27 10' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT N 7, WALKER 01-007-0027 NOTES: O O O 0' S 79°20,5'1„ 32.52 \L3 � T•D (§3 p 'PCON 5‹oN` \ / 20' WIDE ACCESS \ EASEMENT (LOT 2B) \ c, / LOT 3 6052 Sq. Ft. 0.14 Acres 75.62, i / i NORTH QUARTER CORNER SECTION 7, T26S, R22E, SLB&M FINAL PLAT OF MILLCREEK CORNER SUBDIVISION A SUBDIVISION LOCATED WITHIN SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 26 SOUTH, RANGE 22 EAST SALT LAKE BASE AND MERIDIAN North 89°48'53" West 2652.77' (BASIS OF BEARING) I I I I� IoM I �y p-u F2 `- I� I"' N 15°05'00" W 18.40' 2.50' I S 19°37'00' E 17.130' I I I S 26°18'00" E 15.95' I S 27°43'09" E pm 14.40' S 19°41'00" W 21.36' S 35°06'00" E 6.65' S 74°42'40" W 6.63' SHARED DRIVEWAY EASEMENT FOR LOTS 1-2A.(HATCHEDAREA). LOTS 3 & 2B WILL ALSO UTILIZE SHARED ACCESS APPROACH FROM MILL CREEK DRIVE. LOTS 2A & 2B ARE FOR TWIN HOME CONSTRUCTION. LOTS 1 & 3 ARE FOR SINGLE FAMILY CONSTRUCTION. 10' WIDE PUBLIC UTILITY ALONG BOUNDARY OF SUBDIVISION. West 2889.96' (TIE) -1/1- NORTHEAST CORNER SECTION 7, T26S, R22E, SLB&M LINE TABLE LINE BEARING DISTANCE L1 N 75°39'09" W 22.56' L2 N 29°31'17" W 18.66' L3 N 79°20'51" E 2.64' L4 N 54°20'10" E 17.60' L5 S 29°31'17" E 19.69' L6 S 75°39'09" E 13.68' L7 S 27°43'09" E 0.14' L8 S 19°41'00" E 9.24' CURVE TABLE CURVE RADIUS ARC LENGTH DELTA ANGLE CHORD LENGTH CHORD BEARING C1 26.00' 20.93' 46°07'52" 20.37' N 52°35'13" W C2 6.00' 4.83' 46°07'52" 4.70' S 52°35'13" E SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I, Lucas Blake, do hereby certify that I am a Professional Land Surveyor, and that I hold License No. 7540504, as prescribed under the laws of the State of Utah. I further certify that by authority of the owners, I have made a survey of the tract of land shown on this plat and described hereon, and have subdivided said tract of land into lots and streets, together with easements, hereafter to be known as MILLCREEK CORNER SUBDIVISION and that the same has been correctly surveyed and monumented on the ground as shown on this plat. Lucas Blake License No. 7540504 Date BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION Beginning at a point being West 2889.96 feet and South 05°14'00" West 100.23 feet from the Northeast corner of Section 7, Township 26 South, Range 22 East, Salt Lake Base and Meridian, and proceeding Thence with Millcreek Drive right-of-way South 19°41'00" West 21.36 feet; thence with said right-of-way South 35°06'00" East 6.65 feet; thence South 74°42'40" West 6.63 feet; thence South 19°41'00" West 30.47 feet; thence North 76°19'00" West 160.00 feet; thence North 00°21'00" East 118.00 feet to a point on Mill Creek Dive right-of-way; along said right-of-way thence South 88°14'00" East 66.90 feet; thence South 88°14'00" East 36.00 feet; thence with a line being 1.0 ft. behind an existing sidewalk South 81°15'00" East 8.20 feet; thence with said line with a curve having a radius of 47.00 feet, to the right with an arc length of 55.46 feet, (a chord bearing of South 48°58'00" East 52.30 feet); thence South 15°05'00" East 18.40 feet; thence South 19°37'00" East 17.30 feet; thence South 26°18'00" East 15.95 feet; thence South 27°43'09" East 14.40 feet to the point of beginning, 21,505 square feet, 0.49 acres. OWNER'S DEDICATIION Know all men by these presents that the undersigned are the owners of the above described tract of land, and hereby cause the same to be divided into lots, parcels and streets, together with easements as set forth to be hereafter known as MILLCREEK CORNER SUBDIVISION and do hereby dedicate for the perpetual use of the public all roads and other areas shown on this plat as intended for public use. The undersigned owners also hereby convey to any and all public utility companies a perpetual, non-exclusive easement over the public utility easements shown on this plat, the same to be used for the installation, maintenance and operation of utility lines and facilities. The undersigned owners also hereby convey any other easements as shown on this plat to the parties indicated and for the purposes shown hereon. ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF COUNTY OF S.S. ON THE DAY OF 20 , PERSONALLY APPEARED BEFORE ME, WHOM DID ACKNOWLEDGE TO ME THAT THEY SIGNED THE FOREGOING OWNER'S DEDICATION FREELY AND VOLUNTARILY AND FOR THE USES AND PURPOSES STATED THEREIN. NOTARY PUBLIC NOTARY PUBLIC FULL NAME: COMMISSION NUMBER: MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: SURVEY NARRATIVE The property has been accurately surveyed with the intent to subdivide land. The basis of bearing is North 89°48'53" West between the Northeast corner and the North Quarter corner of Section 7, Township 26 South, Range 22 East, Salt Lake Base and Meridian. 5/8" x 24" rebar with survey cap to be placed at all lot corners or rights of way. Off -set pins to be placed in the back of the curb where applicable, in lieu of rebar and cap at front corners. A SUBDIVISION LOCATED WITHIN SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 26 SOUTH, RANGE 22 EAST SALT LAKE BASE AND MERIDIAN RED DESE Land Surveying 30 South 100 East Moab, UT 84532 435.259.8171 Project 208-18 Date 4/16/19 Sheet 1 OF 1 APPROVAL BY MOAB CITY PUBLIC WORKS APPROVED THIS 20 DAY OF AD, APPROVED THIS APPROVAL BY MOAB CITY ATTORNEY DAY OF AD, 20 APPROVED THIS APPROVAL BY MOAB CITY ENGINEER DAY OF AD, 20 APPROVAL BY MOAB CITY PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED THIS DAY OF AD, 20 APPROVED THIS APPROVAL BY MOAB CITY COUNCIL DAY OF AD, 20 COUNTY RECORDER NO. STATE OF UTAH, GRAND COUNTY, RECORDED AT THE REQUEST OF DIRECTOR CITY ATTORNEY CITY ENGINEER CHAIR MOAB CITY MAYOR ATTEST: DATE BOOK PAGE COUNTY RECORDER FEE Moab City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: May 14, 2019 Title:​ Discussion and Possible Action - Proposed Ordinance #2019-11 Amending Certain Provisions of Moab Municipal Code Chapter 5.67 pertaining to Short Term Rentals Date Submitted: ​April 18, 2019 Staff Presenter:​ Rachel Stenta, Finance Director Attachment(s):​ Proposed Ordinance Options: ​Approve, deny, or modify. Recommended Motion: ​I move to adopt the “ Proposed Ordinance 2019-11 amending Certain Provisions of Chapter 5.67” Background/Summary: As you are aware, earlier this year Chapter 5.67 of Moab Municipal Code was modified to revise the regulations for Nightly Rentals. During the implementation of the new Ordinance, we found an area that requires clarification. Previously, it was our recommendation that each owner obtain a separate sales tax license. Based on feedback from applicants, we have researched the issue in depth with the Utah State Tax Commission. The Tax Commission requires that a location either have a sales tax identification number or be listed as an outlet under a master sales tax license. This ordinance changes City code to be consistent with that requirement. The ultimate goal is that all sales tax be collected, reported and remitted and the State Tax Commission regulates the means by which that happens. We ask that you amend the ordinance to reflect those changes and bring us into compliance with state tax regulations and procedures. Thanks and please let us know if you have any questions. 1    CITY OF MOAB ORDINANCE 2019-11 AN ORDINANCE MODIFYING MOAB MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE 5, CHAPTER 5.67, PERTAINING TO NIGHTLY RENTALS The following findings describe the intent and purpose of this ordinance: a. From time to time the City amends its ordinances to remove outdated provisions or improve its operations. b. State law changes, along with changes in what kinds of businesses are operating in Moab, necessitate changes to Moab City Code Title 5 Business Licenses and Regulations. c. Revisions were made to this section on February 26, 2019 and since that time an area requires clarification. d. The City finds that these changes are necessary and appropriate. Therefore, the City of Moab: 1. Amends Title 5 as described in the attached document. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Moab City Council on this 14th day of May, 2019. SIGNED: ATTEST: ______________________ ____________________ Emily S. Niehaus, Mayor Sommar Johnson, Recorder Ch. 5.67 Nightly Rental Licenses | Moab Municipal Code Page 1 of 6 The Moab Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 18-22, passed December 11, 2018. Chapter 5.67 NIGHTLY RENTAL LICENSES Sections: 5.67.010 Definitions. 5.67.020 Licenses--Required. 5.67.025 License fee. 5.67.030 Application. 5.67.040 Renewal--Term. 5.67.050 Grounds for denial. 5.67.060 Appeal of denial. 5.67.065 Assignment prohibited, application upon transfer. 5.67.070 License revocation, grounds. 5.67.080 Revocation procedure, right to cure. 5.67.090 Penalties. 5.67.100 General operating standards. 5.67.010 Definitions. For purposes of this chapter: A.  “Agent” means any legally authorized entity acting on behalf of a property owner, including but not limited to a property manager, a property management company, an executor of the owner’s estate, or other legal fiduciary. B.  “Nightly rental,” also called “short-term rental,” means: 1.  The use, occupancy, rent or lease, for direct or indirect remuneration, of a structure or any portion thereof, constructed for single household or multi-household occupancy, or of any other residential property, or residential property within a commercial building, for a term of thirty consecutive days or less. 2.  The commercial use, by any person, of residential property, or residential property within a commercial building, for hostel, hotel, inn, lodging, motel, resort or other transient lodging uses, where the term of occupancy, possession or tenancy of the property is for a term of thirty consecutive days or less. Ch. 5.67 Nightly Rental Licenses | Moab Municipal Code Page 2 of 6 The Moab Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 18-22, passed December 11, 2018. 3.  For the purposes of this section, “remuneration” means compensation, money, rent, or other bargained-for consideration given in return for occupancy, possession or use of real property. 4.  For purposes of this section, “nightly rentals” shall include bed and breakfasts. (Ord. 18- 15 § 2, 2018) 5.67.020 Licenses--Required. A.  No person shall operate or engage in any nightly rental activity within the City of Moab without first obtaining and maintaining a valid nightly rental business license as required by Chapter 5.04. B.  Each owner of property within the City of Moab that is being used as a nightly rental must obtain a nightly rental license. An owner may allow his or her agent to apply for and obtain the nightly rental license; however, the license shall be in the property owner’s name, and filed under the property owner’s name in the City license records. C.  An individual owner who owns multiple nightly rental properties must obtain a separate license for each nightly rental property, and may list up to four (4) nightly rental property locations on one license application. A nightly rental business license fee will be assessed for each property location. Sales tax for each location must be reported and remitted to the Utah State Tax Commission as per current state regulations and requirements. Property managers and property management companies may not include multiple nightly rental properties in one license. D.  If an owner of a nightly rental is using a D.B.A., that D.B.A. must be registered with the Utah Department of Commerce. E.  The owner shall be the licensee, but the property manager or local representative, if applicable, shall be deemed the responsible party for purposes of operating standards and management standards. (Ord. 18-15 § 2, 2018) Ch. 5.67 Nightly Rental Licenses | Moab Municipal Code Page 3 of 6 The Moab Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 18-22, passed December 11, 2018. 5.67.025 License fee. From time to time, the City Council may establish license fees for nightly rentals operating within the City limits. Fees shall be based on the total number of bedrooms in each nightly rental. (Ord. 18-15 § 2, 2018) 5.67.030 Application. B.  The applicant must show that the facility meets minimum performance standards as specified below in general operating standards. C.  An inspection by the Building Inspector, Fire Chief and Health Department shall be required prior to issuance of a license and as often as necessary for enforcement of this chapter. The plans and the property itself must be approved by the Building Inspector, Fire Chief and Health Department prior to issuance of a license. (Ord. 18-15 § 2, 2018) 5.67.040 Renewal--Term. The license for a nightly rental property shall be renewed annually on July 1st, if all the conditions required at the time of the initial approval remain unchanged. (Ord. 18-15 § 2, 2018) 5.67.050 Grounds for denial. An application for a nightly rental license may be denied for any of the grounds listed in Section 5.04.040, or for a failure to fulfill any of the application requirements. (Ord. 18-15 § 2, 2018) 5.67.060 Appeal of denial. An appeal of a denial of a nightly rental business license shall follow the appeals procedure specified in Section 5.04.050. (Ord. 18-15 § 2, 2018) Ch. 5.67 Nightly Rental Licenses | Moab Municipal Code Page 4 of 6 The Moab Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 18-22, passed December 11, 2018. 5.67.065 Assignment prohibited, application upon transfer. A.  No license issued under this chapter may be assigned or transferred to any person or entity not named therein; nor shall any license be assigned or transferred to another nightly rental property, whether owned by the named licensee or by another person or business entity. B.  Upon the sale, conveyance, or transfer of a nightly rental property, the new owner or transferee shall, within ten business days of completion of the conveyance or sale, apply for a new nightly rental license, if he/she intends to operate a nightly rental on the premises. (Ord. 18- 15 § 2, 2018) 5.67.070 License revocation, grounds. A nightly rental license may be revoked for any of the grounds listed in Section 5.04.080, or for a violation of any of the operating standards or management standards set forth below. (Ord. 18- 15 § 2, 2018) 5.67.080 Revocation procedure, right to cure. The revocation procedure and appeal process shall follow the procedures outlined in Section 5.04.090. (Ord. 18-15 § 2, 2018) 5.67.090 Penalties. A.  Any owner and/or property manager of a dwelling within the City of Moab who allows or permits occupation of said dwelling as a nightly rental, as defined herein, without having first obtained a business license in accordance with the provisions of this section shall be guilty of a Class A misdemeanor. The fine for a Class A misdemeanor shall be imposed for each day that the violation continued or continues to be committed B.  Any other violation of this chapter may be punishable, at the election of the City, as a Class A misdemeanor, as defined under the Utah Code, or by civil action to enjoin or abate the violation. The fine for a Class A misdemeanor shall be imposed for each day that the violation Ch. 5.67 Nightly Rental Licenses | Moab Municipal Code Page 5 of 6 The Moab Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 18-22, passed December 11, 2018. continued or continues to be committed. Proof of a violation of this section shall be sufficient to obtain an injunction. In the event of civil enforcement, the City may recover its reasonable attorney fees and court costs against the violator. (Ord. 18-15 § 2, 2018) 5.67.100 General operating standards. Nightly rentals may be allowed where the applicant can show evidence of compliance with the standards and procedures outlined below, and where there is minimal impact on adjacent properties and neighborhoods. A.  No license shall be granted for a nightly rental operation unless allowed as a land use in the underlying zoning district(s) in which it operates. B.  The nightly rental must meet all applicable building, health and fire codes for the intended use. C.  A maximum stay at a nightly rental by an individual or particular group shall not exceed thirty consecutive days. D.  Maximum occupancy of any nightly rental shall be ten persons at any one time. If, however, the property has a fire sprinkler system or other fire suppression system acceptable to the Moab Fire Chief, and the owner obtains written approval from the Fire Chief, a greater maximum occupancy may be approved by the City Treasurer. E.  Each sleeping room must be equipped with smoke and CO (carbon monoxide) detectors. F.  All nightly rental owners or property managers must collect and pay the applicable State transient room tax, State sales tax, City resort communities sales tax, City municipal transient rooms tax, and pay the City business license fee. G.  Water and sewer impact fees for nightly rentals shall be calculated pursuant to Chapter 13.25. H.  Water and sewer rates for nightly rentals shall be calculated according to the rate formulas contained in Chapter 13.24. I.  The owner or property manager shall provide information on current or past occupants to police, emergency, or City personnel as requested. The owner or property manager shall respond Ch. 5.67 Nightly Rental Licenses | Moab Municipal Code Page 6 of 6 The Moab Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 18-22, passed December 11, 2018. to complaints and concerns within one hour of any phone call or other notification. Failure of the owner or property manager to respond in a timely manner may result in a violation and possible fines to the owner and/or property manager, or revocation of the nightly rental license. (Ord. 18- 15 § 2, 2018) The Moab Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 18-22, passed December 11, 2018. Disclaimer: The City Recorder's Office has the official version of the Moab Municipal Code. Users should contact the City Recorder's Office for ordinances passed subsequent to the ordinance cited above. City Website: moabcity.org City Telephone: (435) 259-5121 Code Publishing Company Ch. 5.67 Nightly Rental Licenses | Moab Municipal Code Page 1 of 6 The Moab Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 18-22, passed December 11, 2018. Chapter 5.67 NIGHTLY RENTAL LICENSES Sections: 5.67.010 Definitions. 5.67.020 Licenses--Required. 5.67.025 License fee. 5.67.030 Application. 5.67.040 Renewal--Term. 5.67.050 Grounds for denial. 5.67.060 Appeal of denial. 5.67.065 Assignment prohibited, application upon transfer. 5.67.070 License revocation, grounds. 5.67.080 Revocation procedure, right to cure. 5.67.090 Penalties. 5.67.100 General operating standards. 5.67.010 Definitions. For purposes of this chapter: A.  “Agent” means any legally authorized entity acting on behalf of a property owner, including but not limited to a property manager, a property management company, an executor of the owner’s estate, or other legal fiduciary. B.  “Nightly rental,” also called “short-term rental,” means: 1.  The use, occupancy, rent or lease, for direct or indirect remuneration, of a structure or any portion thereof, constructed for single household or multi-household occupancy, or of any other residential property, or residential property within a commercial building, for a term of thirty consecutive days or less. 2.  The commercial use, by any person, of residential property, or residential property within a commercial building, for hostel, hotel, inn, lodging, motel, resort or other transient lodging uses, where the term of occupancy, possession or tenancy of the property is for a term of thirty consecutive days or less. Ch. 5.67 Nightly Rental Licenses | Moab Municipal Code Page 2 of 6 The Moab Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 18-22, passed December 11, 2018. 3.  For the purposes of this section, “remuneration” means compensation, money, rent, or other bargained-for consideration given in return for occupancy, possession or use of real property. 4.  For purposes of this section, “nightly rentals” shall include bed and breakfasts. (Ord. 18- 15 § 2, 2018) 5.67.020 Licenses--Required. A.  No person shall operate or engage in any nightly rental activity within the City of Moab without first obtaining and maintaining a valid nightly rental business license as required by Chapter 5.04. B.  Each owner of property within the City of Moab that is being used as a nightly rental must obtain a nightly rental license. An owner may allow his or her agent to apply for and obtain the nightly rental license; however, the license shall be in the property owner’s name, and filed under the property owner’s name in the City license records. C.  An individual owner who owns multiple nightly rental properties must obtain a separate license for each nightly rental property, and may list up to four (4) nightly rental property locations on one license application. A nightly rental business license fee will be assessed for each property location. Sales tax for each location must be reported and remitted to the Utah State Tax Commission as per current state regulations and requirements. Property managers and property management companies may not include multiple nightly rental properties in one license. D.  If an owner of a nightly rental is using a D.B.A., that D.B.A. must be registered with the Utah Department of Commerce. E.  The owner shall be the licensee, but the property manager or local representative, if applicable, shall be deemed the responsible party for purposes of operating standards and management standards. (Ord. 18-15 § 2, 2018) Ch. 5.67 Nightly Rental Licenses | Moab Municipal Code Page 3 of 6 The Moab Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 18-22, passed December 11, 2018. 5.67.025 License fee. From time to time, the City Council may establish license fees for nightly rentals operating within the City limits. Fees shall be based on the total number of bedrooms in each nightly rental. (Ord. 18-15 § 2, 2018) 5.67.030 Application. A.  The application for a nightly rental license shall include all of the items outlined in Section 5.04.030. Sales tax registration, reporting and remittance for each location must in accordance with current Utah State Tax Commission regulations and requirements B.  The applicant must show that the facility meets minimum performance standards as specified below in general operating standards. C.  An inspection by the Building Inspector, Fire Chief and Health Department shall be required prior to issuance of a license and as often as necessary for enforcement of this chapter. The plans and the property itself must be approved by the Building Inspector, Fire Chief and Health Department prior to issuance of a license. (Ord. 18-15 § 2, 2018) 5.67.040 Renewal--Term. The license for a nightly rental property shall be renewed annually on July 1st, if all the conditions required at the time of the initial approval remain unchanged. (Ord. 18-15 § 2, 2018) 5.67.050 Grounds for denial. An application for a nightly rental license may be denied for any of the grounds listed in Section 5.04.040, or for a failure to fulfill any of the application requirements. (Ord. 18-15 § 2, 2018) Ch. 5.67 Nightly Rental Licenses | Moab Municipal Code Page 4 of 6 The Moab Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 18-22, passed December 11, 2018. 5.67.060 Appeal of denial. An appeal of a denial of a nightly rental business license shall follow the appeals procedure specified in Section 5.04.050. (Ord. 18-15 § 2, 2018) 5.67.065 Assignment prohibited, application upon transfer. A.  No license issued under this chapter may be assigned or transferred to any person or entity not named therein; nor shall any license be assigned or transferred to another nightly rental property, whether owned by the named licensee or by another person or business entity. B.  Upon the sale, conveyance, or transfer of a nightly rental property, the new owner or transferee shall, within ten business days of completion of the conveyance or sale, apply for a new nightly rental license, if he/she intends to operate a nightly rental on the premises. (Ord. 18- 15 § 2, 2018) 5.67.070 License revocation, grounds. A nightly rental license may be revoked for any of the grounds listed in Section 5.04.080, or for a violation of any of the operating standards or management standards set forth below. (Ord. 18- 15 § 2, 2018) 5.67.080 Revocation procedure, right to cure. The revocation procedure and appeal process shall follow the procedures outlined in Section 5.04.090. (Ord. 18-15 § 2, 2018) 5.67.090 Penalties. A.  Any owner and/or property manager of a dwelling within the City of Moab who allows or permits occupation of said dwelling as a nightly rental, as defined herein, without having first Ch. 5.67 Nightly Rental Licenses | Moab Municipal Code Page 5 of 6 The Moab Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 18-22, passed December 11, 2018. obtained a business license in accordance with the provisions of this section shall be guilty of a Class A misdemeanor. The fine for a Class A misdemeanor shall be imposed for each day that the violation continued or continues to be committed B.  Any other violation of this chapter may be punishable, at the election of the City, as a Class A misdemeanor, as defined under the Utah Code, or by civil action to enjoin or abate the violation. The fine for a Class A misdemeanor shall be imposed for each day that the violation continued or continues to be committed. Proof of a violation of this section shall be sufficient to obtain an injunction. In the event of civil enforcement, the City may recover its reasonable attorney fees and court costs against the violator. (Ord. 18-15 § 2, 2018) 5.67.100 General operating standards. Nightly rentals may be allowed where the applicant can show evidence of compliance with the standards and procedures outlined below, and where there is minimal impact on adjacent properties and neighborhoods. A.  No license shall be granted for a nightly rental operation unless allowed as a land use in the underlying zoning district(s) in which it operates. B.  The nightly rental must meet all applicable building, health and fire codes for the intended use. C.  A maximum stay at a nightly rental by an individual or particular group shall not exceed thirty consecutive days. D.  Maximum occupancy of any nightly rental shall be ten persons at any one time. If, however, the property has a fire sprinkler system or other fire suppression system acceptable to the Moab Fire Chief, and the owner obtains written approval from the Fire Chief, a greater maximum occupancy may be approved by the City Treasurer. E.  Each sleeping room must be equipped with smoke and CO (carbon monoxide) detectors. F.  All nightly rental owners or property managers must collect and pay the applicable State transient room tax, State sales tax, City resort communities sales tax, City municipal transient rooms tax, and pay the City business license fee. Ch. 5.67 Nightly Rental Licenses | Moab Municipal Code Page 6 of 6 The Moab Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 18-22, passed December 11, 2018. G.  Water and sewer impact fees for nightly rentals shall be calculated pursuant to Chapter 13.25. H.  Water and sewer rates for nightly rentals shall be calculated according to the rate formulas contained in Chapter 13.24. I.  The owner or property manager shall provide information on current or past occupants to police, emergency, or City personnel as requested. The owner or property manager shall respond to complaints and concerns within one hour of any phone call or other notification. Failure of the owner or property manager to respond in a timely manner may result in a violation and possible fines to the owner and/or property manager, or revocation of the nightly rental license. (Ord. 18- 15 § 2, 2018) The Moab Municipal Code is current through Ordinance 18-22, passed December 11, 2018. Disclaimer: The City Recorder's Office has the official version of the Moab Municipal Code. Users should contact the City Recorder's Office for ordinances passed subsequent to the ordinance cited above. City Website: moabcity.org City Telephone: (435) 259-5121 Code Publishing Company Moab City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: May 14, 2019 Title: Approval of a Purchasing Exception for Rick ’s Glass for an amount not to exceed $105,000 for past MARC, Recreation and Facilities repairs and potential upgrades necessary through the end of this fiscal year. Disposition: Discussion and possible action Staff Presenter: Joel Linares, City Manager Attachment(s): Recommended Motion: I move to approve an alternative procurement procedure in accordance with Moab Municipal Code Section 2.28.110(E) for Rick’s Glass in an amount not to exceed $105,000 for fiscal year 2018/2019. Background/Summary: Throughout fiscal year 2018/2019, Rick’s Glass has been used for various projects for the MARC, Center Street Gym, City Center and other City facilities. They have been very responsive to the City’s need for various facilities renovations and projects. Our current payments to Rick’s Glass total $95,730.21. The total includes a payment for $42,355.58 for window upgrades at the MARC. The former Parks, Recreation, and Trails Director sent out a Request for Bids (RFB) for the project but no bids were submitted. This amount also includes a number of other Recreation Department , City Center and MRAC repairs. Moab City Council Agenda Item Meeting Date: May 14, 2019 Title: Ordinance 209-16: An Ordinance Authorizing Electronic Participation in City Council Meetings and Establishing Procedures for Electronic Participation Date Submitted: May 8, 2019 Presenters: Chris McAnany Attachment(s): -Draft Ordinance 2019-16 Suggested Motion: I move to adopt Ordinance 2019-16. Background/Summary: As requested. 1 CITY OF MOAB ORDINANCE No. 2019-16 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING ELECTRONIC PARTICIPATION IN CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS AND ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR E L E C T R O N I C P A R T I C I P A T I O N The following describes the intent and purpose of this ordinance: a.Pu r s u a n t to U.C.A. § 52-4-207 p u b l i c bodies are authorized t o c o n d u c t public meetings in w h o l e o r in p a r t by means o f a telephone or t e l e c o m m u n i c a t i o n s conference; b.U.C.A. § 52-4-207(2)(a) provides t h a t a p u b l i c b o d y shall e s t a b l i s h w r i t t e n p rocedures governing a n e l e c t r o n i c meeting w h e n o n e or more members o f the p u b l i c body are participating b y m e a n s o f electronic communication; and c.It is desirable that City Council members, the Mayor, and/or City staff be able to participate in City Council meetings remotely when they are unable to physically attend a meeting due to emergency, illness, or outside work or family obligations. The Moab Municipal Code shall be amended with the adoption of the following new section: 2.04.100 Meetings - Electronic Participation. A.Electronic Participation Authorized. Moab City Council members, the Mayor, and/or City staff may participate in an electronic meeting of the City Council as set forth in this section. All actions undertaken at an electronic meeting held in compliance with this section are valid and binding, to the same extent as if all participants had been physically present at the anchor location. A request to participate by electronic means shall be made to the City Manager not less than 48 hours prior to the meeting in question and may be denied if the City does not have the technical capability to connect electronically to the remote location. B.Definitions. The following definitions apply to this section: 1.Anchor location means the Moab City Council Chambers, or any other physical location where a public meeting is held and from which the electronic meeting originates. 2.Electronic meeting means a meeting of the City Council convened or conducted where a Council member, the Mayor, or City staff participate via real-time audio or video telecommunication means. 3. Remote location means any place, other than the anchor location, where meeting participants can establish electronic access to a City Council meeting. 2 C.Quorum for Electronic Meetings. 1. As otherwise defined in this Chapter, a majority of the City Council constitutes quorum for the transaction of business. A quorum must be present at the anchor location to convene an electronic meeting of the City Council. 2. Council members participating in an electronic meeting from a remote location shall be considered present and are authorized to vote and participate in the meeting as if they were at the anchor location. 3. In the event of an equipment failure, or other similar event causing an interruption of communication with the remote location, the Council has discretion to either: i) act on the matters up for consideration on its agenda; or ii) continue the matter to a subsequent meeting. D.Electronic Public Participation. Provided that the City has the technical capabilities, the Mayor or presiding officer has discretion to allow an electronic meeting in which members of the public participate from a remote location. Requests for electronic public participation shall be made as provided under subsection A. E.General Procedures. 1.Notice of any electronic meeting of the Council shall be given in the same manner as provided for all other City Council meetings. Meeting procedures for electronic meeting of the Council shall be the same as for non-electronic meetings, except as noted below. 2.A speakerphone, or similar amplifying electronic device, shall be connected in such a manner that comments made by the persons participating electronically will be broadcast at the anchor location. The presiding officer shall allow remote participants to participate in the discussion to the same extent as if they were present at the anchor location. 3.Matters called to a vote in an electronic meeting shall be via roll-call vote, and Council members or the Mayor (if applicable) participating from a remote location must state their name and their vote audibly when asked by the Recorder. 4.Minutes of all meetings shall record the presence of members participating through electronic means. The roll call for members present will be taken verbally and recorded. 3 Passed and adopted by action of the City Council this 14th day of May, 2019. By:__________________________ Mayor Emily S. Niehaus Attest: By:_____________________________________________ Sommar Johnson, Recorder Date ###