The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My Public Portal AboutResolution 96-35321 1 1 RESOLUTION NO. 96 -3532 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA. FINDING THE CITY TO BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP) AND ADOPTING THE CMP LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION REPORT, IN ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65089 WHEREAS, the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (" 1VITA "), acting as the Congestion Management Agency for Los Angeles County, adopted the 1995 Congestion Management Program in November 1995; and WHEREAS, the adopted CMP requires that MTA annually determine that the County and cities within the County are conforming to all CMP requirements; and WHEREAS, the adopted CMP requires submittal to the MTA of the CMP local implementation report; and WHEREAS, a notice was duly published advising the public of the City Council's consideration of this matter at their meeting of September 3, 1996. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the City of Temple City has taken all of the following actions, and that the City is in conformance with all applicable requirements of the 1995 CMP. 1. The City of Temple City has conducted annual traffic counts and calculated levels of service for selected arterial intersections, consistent with the requirements identified in the CMP Highway and Roadway System Chapter. 2. The City of Temple City has locally adopted and continues to implement a transportation demand management ordinance, consistent with the minimum requirements identified in the CMP Transportation Demand Management Chapter. 3. The City of Temple City has locally adopted and continues to implement a land use analysis program, consistent with the minimum requirements identified in the CMP Land Use Analysis Program Chapter. 4. The City of Temple City has prepared a local implementation report, consistent with the requirements identified in the CMP. This report balances traffic congestion impacts due to growth within Temple City with transportation improvements and demonstrates that the City of Temple City is meeting its responsibilities under the Countywide Deficiency Plan. SECTION 2. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and shall forward a copy of this Resolution to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. The City Clerk shall enter this resolution into the book of original resolutions. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 3rd day of September 1996. MAYOR Resolution No. 96 -3532 Page 2 ,?.a/gth,- I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution, Resolution No. 96 -3532 was adopted by the City Council of the City of Temple City at a regular meeting held on the 3rd day of September, 1996 by the following vote: AYES: Councilman - Breazeal, Budds, Gillanders, Souder, Wilson NOES: Councilman -None ABSENT: Councilman -None y Cl r k� 1 1 1 1 APPENDIX E - INSTRUCT:ONS FOR COMPLETING LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION REPORTS PAGE E -` EXHIBIT E -2 DEFICIENCY PLAN STATUS SUMMARY JURISDICTION: 6.;&i f CONTACT: 6 f�.p� l 0(44/5 4-71 f!� ni yh u i.0 ,.0-8,v Ai Yee ' PHONE: 9' / a 2 _ 2 / 1995 Congestion Management Program for Los Angeles County .November 1995 1. Carryover Credit from Last Year's Local Implementation Report + It Er 6 • •r 2. Total Current Congestion Mitigation Goal [from Section I] ( -) 2 ') • 2— Subtotal Current Credit (Goal) = Lt5 7. 3 3. Transportation Improvements Credit Claims [from Section II] + d . 0 NET DEFICIENCY PLAN BALANCE _ 9---57. 3 CONTACT: 6 f�.p� l 0(44/5 4-71 f!� ni yh u i.0 ,.0-8,v Ai Yee ' PHONE: 9' / a 2 _ 2 / 1995 Congestion Management Program for Los Angeles County .November 1995 APPENDIX L - INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION REPORTS PAGE E -9 EXHIBIT E -3 SECTION I - NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REPORT PART 1: NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY 1995 Congestion Management Program lur Los Angeles County .November 1995 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Category Number of Dwelling Units Impact Value Sub -total Single- Family /3 x 6.80 = (88.tt) Multi- Family 9 x 4.76 = (112.;,) Group Quarters x 1.98 = ( ) COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Category Thousands of Value per Sub -total Gross Square Feet 1000 sq.ft. Commercial 0 -299 KSF x 22.23 = ( ) Commercial 300+ KSF x 17.80 = ( ) Free - Standing Eating and Drinking x 66.99 = ( ) NON - RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY Category Thousands of Value per Sub -total Gross Square Feet 1000 sq.ft. Lodging x 7.21 = ( ) Industrial x 6.08 = ( ) Office 0 -49 KSF x 16.16 = ( ) Office 50 -299 KSF x 10.50 = ( ) Office 300+ KSF x 7.35 = ( ) Medical x 16.90 = ( ) Government x 20.95 = ( ) lnstitutional/Education x 7.68 = ( ) University Per Student x 1.66 = ( ) Other ( Describe) Daily Trips Impact Value Sub -total x 0.71 = ( ) ADJUSTMENTS (OPTIONAL) - Complete Part 2 = + 102 TOTAL CURRENT CONGESTION MITIGATION GOAL (POINTS) = (29.2) 1995 Congestion Management Program lur Los Angeles County .November 1995 .APPENDIX E - INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION REPORTS PAGE E -10 EXHIBIT E -3 (continued) SECTION I - NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REPORT PART 2: NEW DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS IMPORTANT: Adjustments may be claimed only for 1) development permits that were both issued and revoked, expired or withdrawn during the reporting period, and 2) demolition of any structure within the reporting period. . RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS Category Number of Dwelling Units Impact Value Sub -total Single - Family Multi- Family Group Quarters 15--- x 6.80 = / O 2- x 4.76 = x 1.98 = COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS Category Thousands of Gross Square Feet Value per Sub -total 1000 sq.ft. Commercial 0 -299 KSF Commercial 300+ KSF Eating and Drinking x 22.23 = x 17.80 = x 66.99 = NON - RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS Category Thousands of Gross Square Feet Value per Sub -total 1000 sq.ft. Lodging Industrial Office 0 -49 KSF Office 50 -299 KSF Office 300+ KSF Medical Government Institutional /Education University x 7.21 = x 6.08 = x i 6.16 = x 10.50 = x 7.35 = x 16.90 = x 20.95 = x 7.68 = x 1.66 = Per Student Other (Describe) Daily Trips Impact Value Sub -total x 0.71 = TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS. POINTS = / 0Z 1995 Congestion ,liana 'ement Program for Los Angeles County .Vovember 1995 APPENDIX E - `VSTRL'CTIONS FOR COMPLETING LOCAL IMPLEMENTAT :ON REPORTS PAGE E -1 1 EXHIBIT E -3 (continued) SECTION I - NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REPORT PART 3: EXEMPTED DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY (NOT INCLUDED IN NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY TOTALS) Low /Very Low Income Housing High Density Resid. near Rail Stations Mixed Use Developments near Rail Stations Development Agreements entered into prior to July 10, 1989 Reconstruction or replacement of buildings damaged due to calamity Reconstruction of buildings damaged in the January 1994 earthquake 0 0 0 O 0 v EXEMPTED DEVELOPMENT DEFINITIONS: Dwelling Units Dwelling Units 1000 gross sf Dwelling Units 1000 gross sf Dwelling Units 1000 gross sf Dwelling Units 1000 gross sf Dwelling Units 1. LowNery Low Income Housing: as defined by the California Department of Housing and Community Development as follows: Low- Income: equal to or Tess than 80% of the median income, with adjustments for family size. Very Low- Income: equal to or Tess than 50% of the median income. with adjustments for family size. 2. High Density Residential Near Rail Stations: development located within 1/4 mile of a fixed rail passenger station which contains a minimum of 24 dwelling units per acre and a minimum density per acre which is equal to or greater than 120 percent of the maximum residential density allowed under the local general plan and zoning ordinance. A project providing a minimum of 75 dwelling units per acre is automatically considered high density. 3. Mixed Uses Near Rail Stations: mixed use development located within 1/4 mile of a fixed rail passenger station, if more than half of the land area, or floor area, of the mixed use development is used for high density residential housing. 4. Development Agreements: projects that entered into a development agreement (as specified under Section 65864 of the California Government Code) with a local jurisdiction prior to July 10. 1989. 1995 Congestion ,lfanagement Program for Los Angeles County .Vovember 1995 APPENDIX E - INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION REPORTS EXHIBIT E -4 SECTION II - TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS CREDIT CLAIMS PA6I: E-13 1 Project Number 2. Strategy 3. Project Description & Reference Documentation 4. Project Scope (units) ( ) 5. Credit Factor 6. Project Credit Value 7. Expected Completion Date 8. Project Cost 9. Local Participation ( %) 10. Current Milestone I I . Milestone Factor 12. Net Current Value U •O 13. Total Credits Claimed fur All Projects ,0 . 0 1995 Congestion Management Program for Los Angeles County November 1995 APPENDIX E - INS I ItIICI IONS FOR COMPI.ETING LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION REPORTS EXHIBIT E -5 SECTION III - FUTURE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS PA(il. F -14 1. Proj //ect Number 2. Strategy 3. Project Description & Reference Documentation (if Available) 4. Project Scope (units) ( ) 5. Credit Factor 6. Project Credit Value 7. Expected Completion Date 8. Project Cost 9. Local Participation ( %) 10. Current Milestone 11. Milestone Factor 12. Net Current Value Usi /`L 13. focal Credits Claimed for All Projects 1995 Congestion Management Program for Los Angeles County November 1995