HomeMy Public PortalAboutRES-CC-1992-08RESOLUTION NO. 08-92
A RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING THE STATUS OF HOUSING CONDITIONS IN
MOAB CITY AND RECOGNIZING THE NEED FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE HOUSING
CONDITIONS WITHIN THE CITY BASED UPON THE FINDINGS OF THE MOAB CITY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & HOUSING NEEDS POLICY PLAN AND ADOPTION OF
THE SAME.
WHEREAS, the City of Moab conducted a housing survey in March
1992, and the results and findings of said survey are contained in
the Moab City Community Development & Housing Needs Policy Plan,
attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, the City of Moab, based on the results of said
survey, recognizes the inadequacies of the housing situation within
the City; and
WHEREAS, the City of Moab recognizes that establishing goals
to improve the housing status within the City is necessary and in
the best interest of the citizens of Moab City; and
WHEREAS, the City of Moab is informed of the availability of
many funding sources for improvement of housing conditions within
the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE MOAB CITY COUNCIL
THAT the aforedescribed Moab City Community Development & Housing
Needs Policy Plan be adopted and that Moab City, through its
various departments and department heads investigate and/or pursue
available avenues to improve the housing condition of the City of
Moab.
DONE IN OPEN COUNCIL this 7TH day of April, A.D.,
1992.
Thomas A. Stocks,
Mayor of Moab City
ATTEST:
John st,
Cit R=corder
MOAB CITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT &
HOUSING NEEDS POLICY PLAN
SECTION 1
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
1.01 - Moab City Planning Goals & Objectives
A11 policies concerning land use, growth, annexation, housing,
transportation, recreation, economic development, parks and
recreation, public safety and education, public facilities and
services, etc. are found in the City of Moab General Plan (adopted
January, 1992). See attachment (A).
There are also other guidelines Moab City follows for planning
purposes which includes the Moab City Ordinances, the Moab City
General Plan Resource Book, the City of Moab Spatial Analysis and
Physical Planning Guidelines prepared by the Utah State University
Environmental Field Service Team in 1989, the City of Moab Parks
and Recreation Master Plan, and the Grand United Future Economic
Development Recovery Plan. All goals, objectives and policies to
assist in goal implementation are found in these documents and the
City of Moab General Plan.
Another planning resource available is City-wide mapping.
Base maps were completed from aerial photographs taken in 1991.
The maps are digital and may be updated as new information is
received. The information can be drawn at any scale and with any
combination of features depending on the purpose of the maps.
SECTION 2
HOUSING
2.01 - Moab profile
The Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy prepared by
the Southeastern Utah Association of Governments completed
December, 1991 covers a profile of Moab City and Grand County
concerning general housing problems, issues and concerns including
elderly and low income households, disabled and homeless housing
needs, demographics, income and employment, cost of housing and
condition of housing. See attachment (B).
The City of Moab also conducted a housing survey in December,
1990. However, since 1990 over 200 remodeling permits have been
issued in the City and housing conditions are improving. The
results of the survey were as follows:
836 acceptable homes (homes in good condition)
246 deficient homes (homes that need minor repairs)
253 deteriorating homes (homes that need substantial repairs)
6 dilapidated homes (homes that should be bulldozed)
A housing survey map and a map showing the location of
buildings in Moab is provided in the attachment section of this
document. See attachment (C).
1
been a serious problem in Moab, the City does not have adequate
quality housing for low-income residents --housing available to low-
income individuals are usually found in run down trailer courts.
2.09 - Summary of population and housing characteristics
See 1990 Census of Population and Housing --attachment (D).
2.10 - Residential antidisplacement and relocation assistance plan
and certification
See attachment (E).
2.11 - Resources available
Financial resources available to assist with housing
developments in Moab City and Grand County include the CDBG Interim
Loan Float Program, Rental Rehabilitation Block Grant Program,
Section 502 Rural Housing Loan (FmHA), Section 504 Rural Rental
Housing Loans (FmHA), Critical Need Housing Funds, Emergency
Shelter Grants, 312 Rehabilitation Program, Unified Tax Exempt
Board Allocation Program, and Housing Development Restricted
Account.
SECTION 3
HOUSING NEEDS & IMPLEMENTATION
3.01 - Needs
At present, Moab is confronted with important issues and
challenges in relation to its housing stock. These issues include:
1) How to best cope with aging neighborhoods?
2) How to provide housing opportunities to those whose economic
capabilities leave them out of the present housing market?
3) How to best handle government programs of housing rehabilitation
and public housing?
4) How to have new potentials in ownership and creative develops nt
concepts to benefit the residents of Moab?
5) How to deal with varying lot sizes and types of structures in
neighborhoods so there is continuity in the sizes and types of
homes?
These issues and others provide a nucleus and delineate the
need for a housing element. With the development of the City
General Plan, Moab is in a position to address housing issues, and
to provide adequate guidance for a comprehensive housing strategy.
The quality of housing depends on a number of variables that
combine to influence the rate of deterioration:
Age: This factor has a major influence on quality. The older the
dwelling, the more the likelihood of structural faults, exterior
maintenance problems, etc.
Building material: The type of material used in construction is
important. A brick home 30 years old will probably withstand
3
useful in improving older neighborhoods and substandard rental
properties. The City has hired a building inspector/zoning
official to help people come into compliance with health, welfare
and safety laws. The City may hire a full or part time code
compliance officer in the future.
Grants and loans: A number of programs and a variety of options
exist to help improve the quality of housing stock in the city. The
rehabilitation of existing structures can be accomplished through
several government programs that provide funding to the occupant in
the form of grants and loans. Information concerning grants and
loans may be obtained from the Utah State Department of Community
and Economic Development.
Residential building plans: In 1991 Grand County formed a Golf
Course Development Committee to create a Master Development Plan
for the municipal golf course. In the future, demands for new
residential housing projects around the City owned golf course will
be expected. New housing projects in the City limits will be
provided by developers. As of March 1992, there is a demand for
more housing in Moab and developers are starting to focus on the
profits of new housing in the area.
Economic development & new commercial development: Moab has
experienced a substantial increase in commercial development in the
last 4 years:
1989
Super 8 Motel
Spouse Variety Store
City Market
1991
McDonalds Restaurant
Eddie McStiffs Restaurant and Brewery
Poplar Place Restaurant and Pub Renovation
Lube-It Shop
1992
Family Drug Store
Comfort Suites Motel
Canyonlands Best Western Motel
Moab Valley Inn Motel
Super 8 Motel Expansion
Silver Sage Motel
Luxury Suites Motel
Red Rock Lodge Motel Expansion
Pasta Joes Restaurant
Fat City Smokehouse Restaurant
The new developments have provided and will continue to
provide jobs for Moab residents. Although most jobs in Moab are
5
ATTACHMENTS
(A) Moab City General Plan
(B) Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy
(C) Housing Survey Map & Building Location Map
(D) 1990 Census of Population & Housing: Summary Population &
Housing Characteristics
(E) Residential Antidisplacement & Relocation Assistance Plan and
Certification
7
ATTACHMENT (A)
Moab City General Plan
ATTACHMENT (B)
Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy
SOUTHEASTERN UTAH ASSOCIATION
OF GOVERNMENTS
COMPREHENSIVE HOUSING
AFFORDABILITY STRATEGY
,,-..;,,,,..:4,:i'-.:.--- :--.0--.5*(0.6'.:', •'.',.,--
,..,,,.........:5/,,.:,..,,,,-2.... ,. -::,......,z.%.,,re.,:?.6-p..‘,::K;,:'.;-:: .r.,,..,1.rii.'07.,,.,:?(A•1..5.tipz:riv:.,-):,,... ..,,
''4.,.i.
:(,,J-r,t,..5. . 6;,:e::7:,-,
ili.,:,,,, ,,,..1,t z.:....- :,...-:,, -.?,,,,,,,, ;'r,'
ex:i.,:t e,...;,
w*, .. i?i1-44,45,,y_isrmmf,, ,N
t';*;.:,7::;f:::;11..
,,,.t.:5.z.':7,:,' ! f..4..1,:
''''':;:''..: ',6i,e,,i.-..-:ij.---..•:,/"*.z-Aik,;:::1••
,..--,....,:,
x,.`i:::..;....7).4.5 `.:‘,Tr.-:'; ';',,,,-,e,!..-.,i:, •.,'",,,',-;(a-21,0e.t.*.,:-.
. ,
i',"!,t4.:':,. , f000.*6-_,'. i:c..,.z4.5%**,-fii,Ec.ii,A4AtOzeot...,..,...,-",:a.:,
,,,,.c..,,,,
':::-i;l:.
;.,--. ?;?i:.•
-;'»?'' "",5,4,r,,,4543fg,,,-,,ie,:.2!..i,,,.••
--:2-0.'0.-,/k.kt,--,-,1-4rst‘:•‘,;,:
INIMIIIIMIIIMMINIIM
SOUTHEASTERN UTAH
ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
COMPREHENSIVE HOUSING
AFFORDABILITY STRATEGY
Prepared by
Deborah L. Hatt, Program Manager
Melissa H. Herrera, Program Assistant
A special thanks to the volunteers whose
efforts contributed to this project.
Funding for this project was provided by
the Department of Housing and Urban Development
thru the Housing and Community Development Act
of 1974, Small Cities CDBG Program.
SOUTHEASTERN UTAH ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
COMPREHENSIVE HOUSING AFFORDABILITY STRATEGY
GRAND COUNTY PROFILE
GENERAL BACKGROUND
Grand County, once famous for its production of uranium, has
only recently gained notoriety for its natural beauty and
breathtaking scenery. A region once home to hundreds of uranium
miners has suddenly become a haven for outdoor enthusiasts and
vacationers. The county encompasses an area of 3,692 square miles
and includes Arches and portions of Canyonlands National Parks, as
well as an uninhabited portion of the Ute Indian Reservation.
With extensive deposits of coal, potash, uranium, oil and
natural gas, Grand county experienced extensive growth and
development in the period of the late 170's and early '80's.
International economic forces, federal energy policy and
environmental concerns have combined to virtually eliminate much of
the natural resource extraction industry in the county. The
recent increase in tourism and the popularity of such outdoor
activities as mountain biking, have lead to significant gains in
employment and job opportunities within the service industries.
However, these new jobs are invariably part time, temporary,
minimum wage and rarely include health insurance, sick leave or
other benefits previously enjoyed by the average worker in this
county. Currently Grand County has the lowest average non-
agricultural wage in the district, and the second lowest in the
State.22
Moab City, with a population of 3,971 (60% of the county
total), is the focus of almost all commercial, cultural and
educational activity in the County. While a small portion of Green
River lies within Grand County, the only other incorporated town in
the county is Castle Valley with a population of 211. Except for
a few very small (10-30 people) communities scattered around the
county, most along I-70, the population of the unincorporated
county is concentrated on the outskirts of the Moab City limits.
Spanish Valley, the most populous unincorporated area, is just
southwest of Moab City on State Hwy 191.
GENERAL HOUSING PROBLEMS/ISSUES AND CONCERNS
Grand County/Moab City's present image as a tourism hot spot
coupled with the decline in real wages previously provided in the
mining industry has caused a lack of affordable housing in the
22Source: Regional Labor Market Report, Utah Department of
Employment Security, 1st Quarter 1991, Published
May 1991
59
LOW INCOME HOUSEHOLDS
By far the greatest need in Grand County is affordable housing
for LMI households. Again, the largest inadequately housed group
is the single female head -of -household family. Many of these
families must depend on less than acceptable trailer/ mobile homes
for housing. The primary housing assistance for LMI individuals
and families are apartments in one of three complexes which have a
total of 60 FMHA subsidized units. A Housing Authority was formed
in the 1970's, but until recently was never completely organized
and has been inactive. Although the current participants are
enthusiastic, diligent and hardworking, the results of their
efforts so far are discouraging. The Housing Authority's first
application for an initial 25 ea. HUD certificate and voucher
subsidies was turned down. The organization was invited by HUD to
apply again in about 12 months.
DISABLED
All 20 of the units in the Senior Complex are also available
to, and are at least minimally adapted for the needs of, the
disabled. There is a waiting list of up to 8 months for one of
these units, and most of the disabled live with their families.
As in Carbon County, this complex is also located on the edge of
town and presents the same type of transportation problems,
especially for the wheelchair bound resident. There is no
supportive/supervised housing for the mentally ill/disabled. In
general, the disabled in Grand County are caught in the same
housing shortage as the other population groups. In addition,
because this is a remote, sparsely populated rural area the social,
medical and rehabilitative services found in larger cities are in
very limited supply here.
HOUSING NEEDS OF THE HOMELESS AND AT -RISK POPULATIONS
The infant Grand County Housing Authority's primary
accomplishment so far has been the establishment of Seekhaven, a 15
bed spouse abuse shelter, which can also provide emergency housing
to women and their children (male children must be under 14 years)
who are homeless because of economic reasons. While this s'.:elter
is only occasionally full to capacity, there is almost ilways
someone in residence, and the majority of clients are from abusive
situations. There are no facilities for the emergency shelter of
resident homeless families or transients. While Grand County is
the hot spot right now for vacationing tourists, the county is
remote from the highways traveled by people moving from city to
city looking for economic opportunities. For this reason, the
homeless transient is rarely seen in Grand County. There are
social and C to both theergency erareetrrrorams ansient andllable residento homeless
non -housing help
family.
61
county has the highest average rents and the lowest average
incomes in the district.
CONDITION OF HOUSING
% of Units Needing Repair: 35%
% of Units Unsuitable for repairs: 3%
Approximate Cost of Repair: $5-15,000
Condition of Rental vs. arOlnerdue to thental units are in
fact that 25� of
much worse condition partly d
the rental units are mobile homes.
Supply of Units (1990 Survey and 1991 Windshield Survey)
TOTAL VACANT % VACANT
1775 14 ' 8%
Single Family 114 0 .0°�
Duplex 0 .0%
4-Plex 48
0 '0%
0°�
Apartment Units 105 105 27 .
Trailer/Mobile Homes
TOTALS
2709 41 1.5%
For additional information, please refer to charts.
63
1NY01R1 impel JO 0
811Nn 1Y101 Emi
limn JO NOIlY01J188Y10
mlrows mVIC11C1130 0311130 PIM&X»'
t
f
G
811Nn JO swum
S3INOH 3118OW
A1Nn00 CINVE10
1NYON% 911Nn JO N
*Limn -mot
11Nn JO NOILY01J188Y10
001
00Z
002
001,
009
MKS ern a3JD71 Cl 101J30 J1H7JJU30 11frldl O
// / ! /! / / / / %7
r
811Nn JO H3814nN
S3X3iddrIOd ONV S3X3-1df10
AlNnoo CINdE10
09
00►
09l
OOL
1NY0YA'limn JO NtSj
811 N n 111.01
uNn JO NOILY01J188Y10
C1V110r111 CELIY i(31?0 111371L30 31101.07 v
OL
0►
09
09
Doti
oat
suNn JO H361YnN
Si1Nn 1N3INIEMV
A1Nn00 CINVE19
LNYOYA 811Nn JO 0
911Nn 1Y101
rr,11
11Nn AO NOILY014188Y10
a3bUM'1 ¢iD9101013a 1,43 71n0 %nw/1/3 4, O
tltl:G:L-/ I:C ` / "r•`�
r
91INn JO H39/1nN
SONM3M0 A lliNVd 3�1JNIS
A1Nnoo aNdao
00Z
00*
009
009
0001
811Nn 1Nvowk dO it ail
of o.in 1V1O1 an
11Nn 30 NOIIVOld188V10
�miMnia /m J lm / DOOM
/ o
83110H 3118OW
0)13 PUe 'ooso 'seupdS uosdwoUl
AiNnoo C\dE10
S'd32:1d 03SIO
N 'N10-13 `SONI8dS NOSd1101-11
3H1 NI 031` D0-1 38V
S3X3-1d8n03 80 S3X3-Idn0 ON
ooso pug 'u1813 'sBuladS uosdwoUl
/1Nn00 C\VHO
0
Sb32:JV OOSIO
4 `N1013 `SONI8dS NOSdWOHl
3Hl NI Q31b001 38V
S11Nn 11\131N18ddd ON
ooslp pi,. 'u1813 'soupdS uosdwoUl
AiNnoo ONVH9
elm 1NVOVA JO 0
H11Nf1Taal gm
11Nf1 AO NOINOIA188V10
eoNI'113M0 Asir ed 31ONIB
0313 pus 'ooso 'sBupdS uosdwoUl
Ai\noo o\vue
e1INn 1NVOVA O at03
911Nn T/101
O11Nn 1NYO•0\ AO #
81INn 1V101
iwn A0 NOIIVOldISTY10
SBWOH 3-11801N
EVICD
I li:1
11Nn d0 NOIIVOUGEN-10
11:1DINKI o 0RIr0uun0 1100110 rawu »v
SBXT-IdldrIOA CINV SD(Bici 10
EVOA
811Nn INYOVA El
811Nn 1Y101
e11Nn 1NVOVA A I
ellNn �Y101
ilNn 40 NOIIVOldle6V-19
among maca o amino IMF
//////////7 ':r
S11Nn 1NDWladd`d
EdO V\
llNn dO NOIIVOld198Y10
SONIT3M0 3-10NIS
EVOA
OZ
Of
09
08
OOL
OZL
��r
S O U T H E A S T E R N U T A H A S S O C I A T I O N O F G O V E R N M E N T S
C O M P R E H E N S I V E H O U S I N G A F F O R D A B I L I T Y S T R A T E G Y
5 - Y E A R H O U S I N G S T R A T E G Y A N D 1 - Y E A R A C T I O N P L A N
M E T H O D O L O G Y A N D S U M M A R Y
T h e p r e c e d i n g r e g i o n a l a n d i n d i v i d u a l c o u n t y p r o f i l e s w e r e
c o m p i l e d p r i m a r i l y u s i n g i n f o r m a t i o n p r o v i d e d b y t h e S E U A O G h o u s i n g
s u r v e y , q u e s t i o n n a i r e s c o m p l e t e d b y t h e r e g i o n ' s r e a l t o r s a n d
h o u s i n g a u t h o r i t i e s , i n p u t f r o m t h e m e m b e r c o m m u n i t y ' s e l e c t e d
o f f i c i a l s , c i v i c l e a d e r s , l a w e n f o r c e m e n t a g e n c i e s , s o c i a l s e r v i c e s
w o r k e r s a n d o t h e r p r o v i d e r s o f s e r v i c e s t o l o w i n c o m e g r o u p s a n d
t h e i n f o r m a t i o n c o n t a i n e d i n t h e D i s t r i c t ' s c u r r e n t O v e r a l l
E c o n o m i c D e v e l o p m e n t P l a n . T h e c o n c l u s i o n s , p r i o r i t i e s a n d
s t r a t e g i e s o f t h i s h o u s i n g p l a n a r e b a s e d o n t h e r e g i o n a l a n d
i n d i v i d u a l c o u n t y p r o f i l e s .
T h e h o u s i n g s u r v e y s h o w s t h a t w h i l e t h i s D i s t r i c t d o e s h a v e
i t s s h a r e o f p r o b l e m s , i n g e n e r a l , t h e p r o b l e m s a r e m i n o r a n d m u c h
m o r e e a s i l y s o l v e d w h e n c o m p a r e d t o m o r e u r b a n a r e a s . E x c e p t f o r
t w o c o m m u n i t i e s ( M o a b a n d P r i c e C i t y ) , t h i s r e g i o n h a s a n
o v e r s u p p l y o f h o u s i n g a n d w i t h t h e a v e r a g e r e n t h o l d i n g a t
$ 2 5 0 / m o n t h , a f f o r d a b l e h o u s i n g i s w i t h i n t h e r e a c h o f a m u c h h i g h e r
p e r c e n t a g e o f t h e L M I p o p u l a t i o n t h a n i s u s u a l l y t h e c a s e .
P r i o r i t i e s a r e b a s e d o n t h e n u m b e r o f p e o p l e a f f e c t e d b y t h e
p r o b l e m , t h e a v a i l a b i l i t y o f f u n d i n g , a n d a r e a l i s t i c a s s e s s m e n t o f
l o c a l c a p a b i l i t i e s a n d r e s o u r c e s . T h e f i r s t c o n c e r n , p r i o r i t y a n d
i m m e d i a t e n e e d f o r t h i s D i s t r i c t i s n o t t h e a c t u a l c o n s t r u c t i o n o r
r e h a b i l i t a t i o n o f h o u s i n g u n i t s , b u t r e a l , s u s t a i n e d e c o n o m i c
g r o w t h , e s p e c i a l l y j o b d e v e l o p m e n t i n i n d u s t r i e s w h i c h p a y a
l i v a b l e w a g e .
U s i n g t h e b e s t i n f o r m a t i o n , s t a t i s t i c s a n d e c o n o m i c i n d i c a t o r s
a v a i l a b l e a t t h e t i m e , o n e o f t h e c o n c l u s i o n s t h e 1 9 8 1 S o u t h e a s t e r n
U t a h H o u s i n g E l e m e n t U p d a t e c a m e t o w a s :
" A s i n d i c a t e d t h r o u g h o u t t h i s d o c u m e n t , c o n t i n u e d e c o n o m i c a n d
p o p u l a t i o n g r o w t h f u e l e d b y d e m a n d f o r n a t u r a l r e s o u r c e s a p p e a r s t o
b e t h e f u t u r e o f S o u t h e a s t e r n U t a h . C o n c o m i t a n t w i t h t h e p r o j e c t e d
g r o w t h w i l l b e d e m a n d f o r i n c r e a s e d f a c i l i t i e s a n d s e r v i c e s , t h i s
o b v i o u s l y w i l l i n c l u d e h o u s i n g . " 3 7
L e s s t h a n e i g h t e e n m o n t h s a f t e r t h e 1 9 8 1 H o u s i n g E l e m e n t w a s
p u b l i s h e d t h e d e m a n d f o r n a t u r a l r e s o u r c e s d r a m a t i c a l l y d e c l i n e d
a n d t h e D i s t r i c t ' s e c o n o m i e s d i d a n a b r u p t a b o u t - f a c e . N o t o n l y
d i d t h e p r o j e c t e d g r o w t h i n p o p u l a t i o n a n d j o b s n o t o c c u r , t h e r e
w a s a c t u a l l y a r e v e r s a l o f m a n y o f t h e g a i n s m a d e u p t o 1 9 8 0 . * F o r
m o s t o f t h e 1 9 8 0 ' s t h e a v e r a g e u n e m p l o y m e n t r a t e w a s w e l l a b o v e 1 0 %
3 7 S o u t h e a s t e r n U t a h H o u s i n g E l e m e n t , 1 9 8 1 U p d a t e , e d i t e d
b y K e i t h J . B u r n e t t
8 7
leaders will not want to commit limited resources to fund a long
term solution to what may be a short term problem.
3. There is a minimal need for supportive/supervised housing, but
in order for this need to be addressed, Federal and State agencies
must be willing to provide the funding necessary to meet the
operation and staffing requirements of these facilities.
4. The last priority for this District is providing more
temporary housing for the transient and resident homeless
populations. There are no local resources available to fund
operation and management for projects targeted to this group.
Particularly in the case of the homeless transient, before any
additional projects can be undertaken, Federal and State agencies
will have to be willing to fund the operation, staffing,
counseling, job training and other rehabilitation services required
to enable the transient and chronic homeless to become self-
sufficient.
RESOURCES
The SEUAOG (and its member counties) would like to be able to
participate in all Federal or State programs made available to this
district. It must be understood, however, that the only way local
resources can be made available to provide required match, to fund
operation and staffing costs or to cover the administration costs
not included in many of these grants is to further reduce the
already very limited level of services local officials now struggle
to provide for this District's citizens.
It is unrealistic to expect the revenues generated by a tax
base of less than 15,000 average residents per county to be able to
provide funds for activities beyond the basic general government
services. Requirements for additional local funding, and major
changes in the current allowable grant activities, will have the
effect of reducing or halting infrastructure construction, economic
development and job growth. Curtailing of these activities will
only increase this District's housing problems.
ONE YEAR ACTION PLAN
1. HUD (and all other Federal funding agencies) are strongly
urged to devise an allocation formula for all grants provided to
the Navajo Nation Reservation, which distinguish the amount of
funding which should be used in the Utah Navajo Strip portion of
the reservation. This portion of the reservation allocation should
be contracted to either the State of Utah or this agency, instead
of the Tribal Council in Window Rock, Arizona. These allocations,
of course, would be used only to the benefit of the residents of
the Utah portion of the reservation.
2. This District also recommends and requests that both the State
89
SOUTHEASTERN UTAH ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
COMPREHENSIVE HOUSING AFFORDABILITY STRATEGY
RESOURCE LIST
1. SEUAOG OVERALL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN
2. 1990 CENSUS OF POPULATION AND HOUSING
3. DISTRICT WIDE WINDSHIELD HOUSING COUNT AND CONDITION SURVEY
4. UTAH LABOR MARKET REPORT (Utah Dept. of Employment Security)
5. SOUTHEAST DISTRICT ECONOMIC REPORT (Utah Dept. of Employment
Security)
6. UTAH ECONOMIC AND BUSINESS REVIEW (BEER Construction Reports)
(Bureau of Economic and Business Research)
7. UTAH STATISTIC OF INCOME -RETURN YEAR 1989 (Utah State Tax
Commission 12/90)
8. STATE OFFICE OF PLANNING AND BUDGET
9. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
10. COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITIES
11. REAL ESTATE AGENCIES
12. LOCAL STATE SOCIAL SERVICES OFFICE
13. JTPA PROGRAM
14. AREA AGENCY ON AGING
15. ACTIVE RE-ENTRY (INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER)
16. UNION GOSPEL MISSION, COLLEEN QUIGLEY SHELTER AND SEEKHAVEN
SHELTER
17. HISTORICAL PROGRAM FILES FROM CSBG, JTPA, MENTAL HEALTH
PROGRAMS, ETC. ADMINISTERED BY THE SEUAOG (The information
contained in individual client files is confidential and
protected by law, no access is available to these files.)
18. CITY AND COUNTY OFFICIALS AND EMPLOYEES (Mayors, Council
Members, Commissioners, City/County Planners, etc.
19. ARTICLES ABOUT HOUSING AND TRANSIENT PROBLEMS PUBLISHED IN
NATIONAL, STATE AND LOCAL NEWSPAPERS AND MAGAZINES
20. LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES
91
ATTACHMENT (C)
Housing Survey Map & Building Location Map
ATTACHMENT (D)
1990 Census of Population & Housing:
Summary Population & Housing Characteristics
Table 1. Age: 1990-Con.
]For definitions of terms and meanings of symbols, see text]
State
County
County Subdivision
Place
All persons
Age
Under 5 years
16 years and
over
18 years and 65 years and 75 years and 85 years and
over 18 to 20 years 21 to 24 years 25 to 44 years 45 to 54 years 55 to 59 years 60 to 64 years over over over
Median aci•
Grand County
Moab division
Castle Valley town
Moab city
Thompson division
Green River city (pt.)
Uintah and Ouray division
6 620
6 337
211
3 971
283
122
521 4 727 4 509 198 181 1 952 661 346 345 826 282 52 34 0
500 4 527 4 320 192 174 1875 632 329 327 791 273 51 34 0
II 162 155 1 1 90 22 7 15 19 3 - 37.5
323 2 871 2 733 130 119 1136 378 211 210 549 203 42 34.0
21 200 189 - 6 7 77 29 17 18 35 9 1 34.1
12 82 77 3 5 31 10 11 8 9 2 30.0
Table 3. Sex, Race, and Hispanic Origin: 1990-00n.
(For definitions of terms and meanings of symbols, see text)
State
County
County Subdivision
Place
All persons
Sex
Roce
Hispanic origin
(of ony race)
Not of Hispanic origin
Male
Female
White
Black
American
Indian, Eskimo,
or Aleut
Asian or Pacific
Islander
Other race
White
Black
American
Indian, Eskimo,
or Aleut
Asian or Pacific
Islander
Other race
Ginrd County
Moab division
Castle Valley town
Moot, city
1hompson division
Green River city (pt.)
Uintah and ()way division
6 620
6 337
211
3 971
283
122
_
3 214
3 074
107
i '200
140
58
_
3 406
3 263
104
C71
113
64
_
6 341
6 084
207
2 7r.'
98
7
7
-
203
190
3
1
f
i2
24
24
I
-
45
32
-
3
12
291
268
8
Ida
15
6 108
5 858
199
250
98
6
6
-
4i0
-
192
182
3
9
22
22
1
r
-
1
1
1
-
cable 15. land Area and Population Density: 1990
(For definitions of terms and meanings of symbols, see text]
State
County
County Subdivision
Place
All persons
Land area
Persons Per -
Square kilo- Square
meters miles
Square ki- Square
lometer mile
The state
Grond County
Moab division
Castle Volley town
Moab city
Thompson division
Green River city (pt.)
Uintah and Gorey division
1 722 850
6 620
6 337
211
3 971
283
122
212 815.5 82 168.2
9 535.8
1 620.2
20.7
7.9
7 112.7
26.3
802.9
3 681.8
625.6
8.0
3.0
2 746.2
10 2
310.0
8.1 21.0
.7
3.9
10.2
502.7
4.6
1.8
10.1
26 4
1 323.7
1
12.0
U.S. Department or Commerce
F.connrnics and Steiisncs Administroiion
BUREAU ()F THE CENSt.:S
CENSUS '90
00 i l 1991 1990 CPH-1-46
1990 Census of
Population and Housing
Summary Population and
Housing Characteristics
Utah
Table 5. effou ehold, Family, and Grc luarters Characteristics: 1990-Con.
(For definitions of terms and meanings of symbols, see text)
State
Family households
Nonfomily households
Persons per-
Persons in group quarters
County
Householder living alone
County Subdivision
Female
house-
65 years and over
Other r-
Place
Persons in
All house-
Married-
couple
holder, no
husband
Institu-
tionalized
sons in
group
households
holds
Total
family
present
Totol
Total
Total
Female
Household Family
Total
persons
quarters
Grand County
6 554
2 489
1 734
1 427
237
755
653
241
179
2.63
3.22
66
32
34
Moab division
6 281
2 386
1 660
1 367
225
726
627
231
176
2.63
3.22
56
32
24
Costle Volley town
211
91
51
47
2
40
32
3
2
2.32
3.16
-
-
-
Moab city
3 921
1 544
1 034
823
165
510
452
184
148
2.54
3.17
50
28
22
Thompson division
273
103
74
60
12
29
26
10
3
2.65
3.16
10
-
10
Green River city (pit.)
Uintah and Ouray division
121
-
39
-
32
_
24
-
6
_
7
_
7
-
2
_
-
_
3.10
3.41
I
-
I
Table 7. Structural and Vacancy Characteristics: 1990-Con.
(For definitions of teens and meanings of symbols, see text)
State
County
County Subdivision
Place
All housing units
Occupied housing units
Vacant housing units
Total
Units in structure
Mobile
home,
1 unit, de- 1 unit, at- 2 to 4 5 to 9 10 or more trailer,
tached tached units units units other
Mean
number of
rooms
With 1.01
or more
persons
Total per room
For sea-
sonol, rec-
reational, Homeown-
er ma- er vacancy Rental va-
Total sional use rate cancy rate
Grand County
Moab division
Castle Volley town
Moab city
Thompson division
Green River city (pt.)
Uintah and Ouray division
2 992
2 809
130
1 761
183
55
1 775
1693
89
1 095
82
29
28
27
1
22
1
134
128
122
6
74
73
73
1
31 950
31 857
- 40
31 418
- 93
- 26
5.1
5.2
4.2
5.2
4.2
4.8
2 489
2 386
91
1 544
103
39
117
110
8
64
7
5
503
423
39
217
80
16
Table 9. Occupancy and Financial Characteristics for Owner -Occupied Housing Units: 1990 -Con.
(For definitions of terms and meanings of symbols, see text(
163
131
23
35
32
5
2.6
2.5
5.6
2.2
4.1
3.7
11 1
10.8
25.0
11.2
15.4
27 8
State
County
County Subdivision
Place
All owner -occupied housing units
Specified owner -occupied housing units
I unit, de- Mean
tached or Persons number
Total attached per unit of rooms
Total
Value
$100,000 $150.000 $200,000 Lower Upper
Less than $50.000 to to to to $300,000 quartile Median quartile
$50,000 $99,999 $149,999 $199,999 $299.999 or more (dollars! (dollars) (dollars)
Grand County
Moab division
Castle Valley town
Moab city
Thompson division
Green River city (pt.)
Uintah and Ouray division
1 831 1 255 2.66 5.7
1 761 1 223 2.66 5.7
85 64 2.29 4.5
1 068 803 2.56 5.8
70 32 2.66 4 9
26 14 2.88 5.2
1 093
1 070
42
732
23
12
552 474 47 7 9 4 37 000 49 700 67 700
534 472 45 7 9 3 37 300 50 100 67 800
15 18 6 - 2 1 32 500 62 500 94 600
402 306 17 4 2 1 36 300 47 700 62 900
18 2 2 - 1 31 800 37 100 46 300
10 2 - - - 32 500 37 500 45 000
Table 11. Occupancy and Financial Characteristics for Renter -Occupied Housing Units: 1990 -con.
(For definitions of terms and meanings of symbolssee text]
State
County
County Subdivision
Place
All renter -occupied housing units
Specified renter -occupied housing units paying cash rent
I unit, de- Mean
cached or Persons number of
Total attached per unit roams
Total
Contract rent
Lower Upper
Less than $250 to $500 to $750 to $1,000 or quartile Median quartile
$250 $499 $749 $999 more (dollars) (dollars) (dollars)
With meals
included in
rent
Grand County
Moab division
Costle Valley town
Moab city
Thompson division
Green River city (pt.)
Uintah and Ouray division
658 268 2.56 4.4
625 253 2.56 4.4
6 1 2.67 3.0
476 198 2.49 4.3
33 15 2.64 4.1
13 4 3.54 4.3
538
517
3
420
21
9
319 218 1
308 208 1
2 1 -
249 170 1
11 10 -
5 4 -
165 226 288
166 225 288
100- 125 313
164 225 288
- 154 242 306
- 154 192 294
Table 13. Occupied Housing Units by Race and Hispanic Origin of Householder: 1990-Con.
[For definitions of terms and meanings of symbols, see text(
2
2
2
State
County
County Subdivision
Place
All occupied
housing units
Race of householder
American
Indian,
Eskimo, or Asian or Pa -
White Black Aleut cific Islander Other race
Householder
of Hisponic
origin (of
any roce)
Householder not of Hispanic origin
American
Indian,
Eskimo, or Asian or Pa -
White Black Aleut cific Islander Other race
Grand County
Moab division
Costle Valley town
Moob city
Thompson division
Green River city (pt.)
Uintah and Ouray division
2 489
2 386
91
1 544
103
39
2 411
2 316
89
1 490
95
33
4
4
2
49
45
1
34
4
3
9
9
1
6
16
12
12
4
3
76
71
2
53
5
3
2 351
2 257
87
1 449
94
33
3
3
49
45
1
34
4
3
9
9
1
6
ATTACHMENT (E)
Residential Antidisplacement & Relocation Assistance
Plan and Certification