Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout2023-09-14 packet Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. Please call (573) 634-6410 with questions regarding agenda items. Notice of Meeting & Tentative Agenda City of Jefferson Public Works & Planning Committee Thursday, September 14, 2023 – 7:30 A.M. City Council Chambers ~ John G. Christy Municipal Building ~ 320 East McCarty Street TENTATIVE AGENDA 1. Introductions 2. Approval of the August 10, 2023 Committee meeting minutes 3. Citizen opportunity to address Council Committee on Stormwater and Other Public Works Issues 4. New Business a. Sales Tax H Projects Prioritization (David Bange) b. General Sidewalk Policy Discussion - Sidewalk on Monroe Street (David Bange) c. Proposed Section 29 Revisions – Sewers and Sewage Disposal (Eric Seaman) d. Street Division Tandem Snow Plow Repair Update (Britt Smith) e. Discuss Transit system going back to full service (Gerry Stegeman) f. High Street Viaduct Options – Schedule Public Input (David Bange) g. Review of Intersection Types (David Bange) h. Northwood Drive Sewer Extension (David Bange) 5. Other/Old Business 6. Reports a. Neighborhood Service Grant Updates (Rachel Senzee) 7. Adjourn NOTES TO JOIN VIRTUALLY: CLICK HERE Meeting ID: 252 517 220 804 Passcode: YQHSk5 CALL-IN PARTICIPATION AVAILABLE AT: 1-872-242-9031 Phone Conference ID: 158 694 165# MINUTES JEFFERSON CITY PUBLIC WORKS AND PLANNING COMMITTEE John G. Christy Municipal Building, 320 East McCarty Street Council Chambers and Virtual August 10, 2023 Committee Members Present: Attendance Scott Spencer, Chairman 4 of 4 Jack Deeken, V. Chairman 4 of 4 Mike Lester 4 of 4 Derrick Spicer 3 of 4 Mark Schwartz 3 of 4 Staff Present: Matt Morasch, Director Public Works David Bange, City Engineer Britt Smith, Operations Division Director Eric Seaman, Wastewater Division Director Gerry Stegeman, Transit Division Manager John Fitch, Civil Engineer II Clint Smith, Director of Planning & Protective Services Rachel Senzee, Neighborhood Services Supervisor Ryan Moehlman, City Counselor Matt Schofield, Fire Chief /Interim City Administrator Grant Haarmann, ITS Angie Haslag, PW Administrative Assistant Sr Chairman Spencer called the meeting to order at 7:30 a.m. A quorum was present at this time. The following guests attended the meeting: Marvin Phillips, Rick & Jan Petty, Eric Weddle, Michael & Paulette Rehagen, Roxane Bly, Glenda Fry, Stephi Smith-News Tribune, Paul Samson (online), Mayor Fitzwater, Councilman Jeff Ahlers 1) Introductions No formal introductions made 2) Approval of the June 8, 2023 Committee meeting minutes Councilman Lester moved and Councilman Spicer seconded to approve the July 13, 2023 meeting minutes, motion carried. 3) Citizen opportunity to address Council Committee on Stormwater and Other Public Works Issues. Citizens present took the opportunity to speak on the proposed roundabout at the intersection of W. Stadium Blvd and Satinwood Dr. *Councilman Spicer left the meeting at this time. 8:13 a.m. Minutes/Jefferson City Public Works and Planning Committee August 10, 2023 2 4) New Business 1. Public Works Budget Overview a. Transit Division (Gerry Stegeman) Mr. Stegeman presented a slide presentation to the Committee members reviewing staff and budget. Mr. Stegeman spoke briefly about the work duties, the aging bus fleet, how many employees and current budget grants and expenditures of the division. b. Wastewater Division – Administration, Collections and Treatment Facility (Eric Seaman) Mr. Seaman presented a slide presentation to the Committee members reviewing the three separate divisions that make up Wastewater. Mr. Seaman spoke briefly about the work duties of each, how many employees and current budget revenues and expenditures. He also touched on the needs of each division. c. Engineering and PW Administration (David Bange / Matt Morasch) Mr. Morasch spoke briefly about the administration for Public Works and what it consists of. Mr. Bange presented a slide presentation to the Committee members reviewing staff and budget that make up the Engineering Division. Mr. Bange also touched briefly that Engineering also assist other departments within the City when needed. 2. Traffic Calming along Shermans Hollow (David Bange) Mr. Bange presented the Committee with a memo and slide presentation with visuals showing the area of the traffic calming request that was brought to the Transportation & Traffic Commission. Mr. Bange noted the use of paint and traffic ducks to complete and that this would be a temporary option for now to see how it works. Mr. Morasch mentioned after the trial period, staff would look to get feedback before anything permanent is installed. With little discussion among Committee members, all agreed to move forward with the temporary option. 5) Other/Old Business No Other nor Old Business 6) Reports a. Neighborhood Service Grant Updates (Rachel Senzee) Ms. Senzee shared a slide presentation of her report. Ms Senzee reviewed new grants and updated where all other grants currently stand. 7) Adjourn Councilman Lester moved, seconded by Councilman Deeken to adjourn the meeting at this time (9:17 a.m.) Memorandum 320 East McCarty Street • Jefferson City, Missouri 65101 • P: 573.634.6410 • F: 573.634.6562 • www jeffersoncitvmo.gov Date: September 11, 2023 To: Public Works and Planning Committee From: David Bange P.E., City Engineer Subject: Sales Tax H Project Priorities y Staff is asking the Committee for direction in regard to the Joint City/County Sales Tax H projects following the Council decision regarding Monroe Street. In March of this year the Public Works and Planning Committee reallocated funding within the Joint City/County project category of Sales Tax H to projects as follows: High Street Viaduct $200,000 Stadium and Satinwood $2,500,000 Monroe Street $3,500,000 Economic Development $1,800,000 Wildwood Drive $3,000,000 Since that time the Council has made the decision not to move forward with the second phase of Monroe Street freeing $2,700,000 from that project, and currently $1,000,000 of what was allotted to economic development has not been specifically assigned. In looking for an answer the question of where to direct these funds it may be helpful to consider the outcomes that are sought. These may be among, or a combination of the following, or others: Improve level of service Economic DevelopmentNitality Safety/resiliency/reliability improvements Active transportation/Micro mobility Beautification/Placemaking System preservation There are a number of planning documents that contain potential projects including the City's Comprehensive Plan, the Metropolitan Transportation Plan, and the Active Transportation Plan. Portions of these plans containing project lists or maps are attached. If you have any questions or concerns I can be reached at 634-6433. U:\Public Works\Engineering\dbange\PUBLIC WORKS & PLANNING\2023\9-2023\Sales Tax H Priorities.docx Activate Jefferson City 2040 A Comprehensive Plan for Jefferson City's Future • V+ •i��-- r a+ _y-�••� C. RESOLUTION RSPZ 2021.01 A.RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI ADOPTING ACTIVATE JEFFERSON CITY 2040, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE WHEREAS, the City of Jefferson Planning and Zoning Commission, hereinafter referred to as the Commission, is responsible for the update and adoption of the Comprehensive Plan for guiding physical growth and development of Jefferson City; and WHEREAS; Activate Jefferson City 2040 is a policy document outlining how Jefferson City should bemaintained, strengthened and. developed. Activate Jefferson City 2040 highlights housing, economic development, transportation, environmental resiliency, land . use, culture, and health issues and opportunities. The Future Land Use Map, a major component of the comprehensive plan, is the rational basis for zoning and other development codes. These components allow Activate Jefferson Cfty 2040 to guide quality of life improvements in Jefferson City; and; WHEREAS, the Commission held a public hearing on the adoption of Activate Jefferson City. 2040 on June 10, 2021, as required by law; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, . MISSOURI, THAT ACTIVATE JEFFERSON CITY 2040 IS THE UPDATED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE CITY OF JEFFERSON. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONINGCOMMISSION RECOMMENDS THE CITY COUNCIL ENDORSE ACTIVATE JEFFERSON CITY 2040 AS THE UPDATED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE CITY OF JEFFERSON. Adopted this 10th day of June, 2021. Attest Eric Barron, Assistant Secretary Acknowledgments City ofJefferson City Council CarrieTergin, Mayor Steve Crowell, City Administrator Hank Vogt, Ward 1 David Kemna, Ward 1 Laura Ward, Ward 2 Michael Lester, Ward 2 Scott Spencer, Ward 3 Erin Wiseman, Ward 3 Derrick Spicer, Ward 4 Ron Fitzwater, Ward 4 Jon Hensley, Ward 5 Mark Schreiber, Ward 5 Former members, J. Rick Mihalevich, Ward 2 Rick Prather, Ward 1 Ken Hussey, Ward 3 Carlos Graham, Ward 4 City ofJefferson Planning Staff Sonny Sanders, AICP, GISP - Planning and Protective Services Director Eric Barron, AICP - Planning Division Manager Ahnna Nanoski, AICP - City Planner City ofJefferson Planning and Zoning Commission Dale Vaughan, Chair Penny Quigg, Vice Chair Jack Deeken Blake Markus Bunnie Trickey Cotten Emily Fretwell Dean Dutoi Gregory Butler Doug Record Shannon Hawk Julie Gampher Spencer Hoogveld Katrina Williams, AICP, GISP - Transportation Planner Lee Bowden -Transportation Planner Beth Sweeten - Administrative Assistant Former employees Ian Zollinger- City Planner Former members, Chris Yarnell Michael Lester Hank Vogt Chris Jordan Michelle Mahoney All photos not otherwise attributed were taken by City ofJefferson staff. All icons in this document are sourced from flaticon.com 3 Executive Summary As one of the smallest capital cities in the nation, Jefferson City is unlike other state capitals. With a population around 43,000, Jefferson City is an employment and commercial hub in mid -Missouri. There is a rich downtown environment, bustling with state government activity, surrounded by quaint neighborhoods. Transportation links extend in all directions, allowing residents to easily visit a major metropolitan, such as St. Louis and Springfield, or escape to nature. Routinely described as having small-town character with big -city amenities, Jefferson City has a strong economy served by a devoted workforce. As Jefferson City prospers, residents take pride in their community and have a growing sense of environmental responsibility paired with a strong desire for healthy and more active lifestyles. These strengths position the community for growth in economic activity, new cultural and recreational opportunities, and a higher level of quality of life. Activate Jefferson City2040 is a key resource in enhancing quality of life, providing planning recommendations on a wide variety of topics developed after extensive research and public involvement. The plan is organized into six themes, with each theme highlighting topics key to quality of life. A principle accompanies each theme to summarize why the topic is important. Housing and Neighborhoods: An equitable housing environment benefits all ofJefferson City residents across different incomes and lifestyles. Goal: Enhance Jefferson City's housing environment, catering to the diverse needs of its residents. Goal: Promote neighborhood stabilization through the rehabilitation and maintenance of residential properties. Goal: Encourage proactive neighborhood health throughoutJefferson City. Economic Development: Productive economic activity is an elixir for improving quality of life. Goal: Enhance Jefferson City's workforce opportunities. Goal: Stimulate economic growth through the pursuit of local and regional projects. Goal: Prioritize creative placemaking and unique investment opportunities in Jefferson City's city center. Goal: Grow Jefferson City's economic market while understanding the complexities of commuter communities. Transportation: Efficient and safe transportation systems are vital to local and regional quality of life factors. Goal: Strengthen Jefferson City as a vibrant regional hub through intermodal connections. Goal: Promote an accessible and well-connected Jefferson City. Goal: Provide Jefferson City residents and visitors with a transportation system that serves their needs. 6 Executive Summary Environmental Resiliency: Environmental resiliency in Jefferson City, or the way individuals use and interact with the natural and human -made environment, is essential for protecting life and property. Goal: Prepare and adaptJefferson City for natural and human -made disasters. Goal: Utilize infrastructure and facility improvements to support the existing population and meet new development needs. Goal: Expand environmentally sustainable and energy efficient practices across Jefferson City. Land Use: Land use and zoning regulation improves quality of life by protecting the health, safety, and welfare of the community. Goal: Enrich the city center environment. Goal: Create robust commercial and employment centers. Goal: Maintain and create responsible, practical, and resilient growth. Capital Culture and Healthy Lifestyles: Social and physical vibrancy is key to Jefferson City's quality of life. Goal: Enhance Jefferson City's culture, focusing on diversity and quality of place. Goal: Sustain a thriving and diverse parks and recreation system. Goal: Increase access to social well-being and physical health amenities. "The mission of the City of Jefferson is to provide effective leadership and stewardship, enhance the present and future quality of life, promote the health, safety and welfare of the community, and efficiently deliver essential and desired services with resolute spirit and absolute integrity." City of Jefferson Mission Statement Affirmed by the City's mission statement, the first step in strengthening quality of life is for local government and other city stakeholders to lead by example. The action plan and long-range annual report, featured in chapters nine and ten of Activate Jefferson City2040, act as tools to help make the goals outlined in this comprehensive plan a reality. The action plan identifies strategies for the goals and objectives tied to each theme. The action plan does not contain everything that is needed to strengthen quality of life within Jefferson City. It is impossible to predict the future; social, economic, and environmental conditions are constantly evolving. Thus, the long-range annual report will act as a monitoring mechanism that will not only encourage implementation, but allow for the incorporation of needed updates into action items. It takes all of us, the City, stakeholders, and the public, to maintain and strengthen quality of life in Jefferson City. 7 Introduction Mobility is a key factor of quality of life. Vibrant transportation systems support resident and business communities. A successful transportation system includes automobile, pedestrian, bicycle, and freight systems. Transportation projects also significantly influence growth patterns. This chapter illustrates the many avenues in which the Jefferson City transportation system can be supported. Jefferson City Transportation System The following provides a brief highlight of Jefferson City's transportation system. Proactive transportation system expansion, population growth, and development are important for the long-term sustainability of a city. Development critical to Jefferson City's history, which showcase transportation milestones, are provided in the "Land Use" chapter. For more detailed information about the Jefferson City transportation system please refer to the various plans and publications produced by the Capital Area Metropolitan Organization (CAMPO), the transportation planning organization for the Jefferson City area. The CAMPO service area also includes the jurisdictions of Holts Summit, St. Martins, Taos, Wardsville, and portions of unincorporated, non -urbanized Cole and Callaway Counties. Highways Jefferson City is centered on the Missouri River and Highway 50 and 54. Highway 63, 94, and 179 also provide significant regional access through Jefferson City. - The city center corridors of Highway 50 and 54 are the most traveled routes in Jefferson City, see Map 5. - The mean travel time to work is 16 minutes. This statistic is average compared to the peer cities in the Midwest. - The most common way to commute to work is via an automobile (car, truck, or van). In regards to other forms of transportation being used, Jefferson City has the smallest amount of their commuting population using non -automotive transportation, see the graphic on the right. Public Transportation Since the early 1970s, the City ofJefferson's Transit Division (JEFFTRAN) has offered public transportation services, along with paratransit. - As of 2019, there are 6 fixed bus routes servicingJefferson City. - During the public engagement processes, many participants expressed concerns over the service hours ofJEFFTRAN. OATS Transit is a nonprofit corporation which provides transportation services to 87 counties in Missouri. This ride -share, demand -response service focuses on the rural general public, senior citizens, and people with disabilities. Those in the Jefferson City area who use the service are typicallytransported to Columbia, MO for medical reasons. - Paratransit is a term used to describe flexible and supplemental transportation services for customers with specific needs. In Jefferson City, Handi-Wheels picks up clients, who qualify underthe Americans with Disabilities Act, inside the city limits and takes them to any destination (grocery store, health care facility, government agency, ect.) within the city limits. - For communities with limited public transportation options, or with under -served public transportation areas, ride -share services with app -based programming, such as Uberand Lyft, provide much needed car - access trips. Figure 10: Commuting to Work in Jefferson City + Peer Cities Commuters taking public transportation, walked, bicycle, or worked at home Jefferson City, MO 4% Concord, NH 11% Cape Girardeau, MO 8% Topeka, KS 7% Joplin, MO 6% Commuting via a car, truck, or van (drove alone or carpool) Jefferson City, MO 94% Concord, NH 88% Cape Girardeau, MO 91% Topeka, KS 92% Joplin, MO 93% Source: 2018ACS 5 -Year Estimates 46 Chapter 5: Transportation RAlNBOWOR PL,ssow O OLD LONMAN RD Oy' 2 4� .C}RAC W MAIN 5T Capital °R o ® Mall M155OURI BLVD o E m o z o 171 3 0 W EDGEWOOD DR St Mary's Hospital Average Annual Daily Traffic Volume 15,000-29,000 9,000-15,000 4,000-9,000 2,000-4,000 < 2,000 Soarce: MoDOT 2018 AADT Jefferson City Memorail Airport ty Missouri State �^ Capitol •S5� �sr ... � City Hall �y Oy0 ® s Lincoln Capital University rrAtt Region (.Ey: Medical o Center 1 <>40, SEVEN HILLS RD Ile Map 5 Significant Corridors Missouri River cow. Missouri National At G. ■ Guard °ARD Headquarters Q0 L Acitivate faff Jefferson City 2040 1116 � Chapter 5: Transportation 47 Non -Automotive Systems Transportation networks with a focus on pedestrian or bicycle systems promote public health, provide affordable transportation options, and reduce environmental concerns associated with automotive use. - As of 2020, Jefferson City has approximately 21 miles of on -street bike lanes. - In 2019, Jefferson City was designated as a bronze level Bicycle Friendly Community. Being a part of the Bicycle Friendly Community program, administered by the League ofAmerican Bicyclists, provides Jefferson City with a road map for improving bicycle conditions, thus making our biking related goals a reality. According to the EPA, walkability depends upon the characteristics of the built environment that influence walking patterns and habits as a mode of travel. - Most of Jefferson City is categorized with a below average National Walkability Index score (5.76 -10.50). - Duringthe public engagement processes many participants expressed concerns over sidewalk availability and the condition of sidewalks in Jefferson City. Capital Area Pedestrian & Bicycle Plan 2016 The Capital Area Pedestrian & Bicycle Plan is a tool for private and public organizations to improve safety, connectivity, and mobility in the CAMPO planning area. The CAMPO planning area includes Holts Summit, Jefferson City, Lake Mykee, St. Martins, Taos, Wardsville, and parts of Cole and Callaway Counties. This plan focuses on the advantages of active transportation, which are not only beneficial for those who regularly walk and bike for recreation or transportation purposes, but also important for community wide safety, economic development, accessibility, and environmental sustainability. Notable Goals Improve user safety of all modes of transportation. Educate the community on the benefits of well- connected transportation system that includes, walking, biking, and transit. Foster a continued, collaborative, and cooperative relationship with the public in the development ofa well-connected transportation system. Successes since the plan's adoption Pedestrian crossing improvements on Missouri Boulevard and Dix Road. Funding secured for the construction of a pedestrian bridge overthe railway. The bridge will link downtown Jefferson City to a river front park (Adrian's Island). Improved pedestrian crossings near transit stops. Notable implementation near the VA Clinic on Edgewood and Wildwood Dr. CAMPO continues to provide a wide range of services for their planning area. CAMPO collaborates with local, state, and national organizations, assists communities with educational campaigns, plan development, land use and zoning matters, and identifies infrastructure needs, just to name a few. 48 Chapter 5: Transportation CAMPO 2045 & Bevond Metropolitan Transportation Plan CMTP12019 The MTP is the Long Range Transportation Plan for the CAMPO planning area. Being updated everyfive years, this plan focuses on multi - modal transportation and how transportation needs can be met in the community. Regional coordination and application is important to maintain safety, infrastructure conditions, system reliability, and sustainability in the transportation system. Notable Goals Improve safety and security for all travel modes. Support economic development and tourism throughout the region. - Support regional partnerships and planning continuity across the region. Improve efficiency in system management, operations, and movement of people and freight. Support land use practices that promote quality of life and economic vitality. Improve accessibility and mobility. Provide a platform for multi -modal transportation education. Implementation stemming from the MTP: - Roadway improvements north of the Missouri River Bridge in Jefferson City are scheduled to occur through 2024. Updated travel demand model and land use analysis is being used to assist in the update of the City's Future Land Use Map and Thoroughfare Plan. The City was awarded a $1.5 million grant, matched with $1.6 million from the city's half -cent capital improvements sales tax, to improve public infrastructure on the Missouri State Penitentiary site. Aviation The Jefferson City Memorial Airport provides non-commercial airline passenger services to the Jefferson City area. - The Columbia Regional Airport, which provides commercial airline passenger services, is located about 20 miles (22 minutes by car) away from Jefferson City. - The Jefferson City Memorial Airport Master Plan was adopted in 2020. This plan guides the continued development of the Jefferson City Memorial Airport, ensuring safety, efficiency, and environmental compatibility. Notably, airfield capacity and facility requirements are included in this tool. TheJefferson City Memorial Airport terminal was significantly damaged during flooding events in 2019 and is being rebuit, meeting floodplain standards. Railroad A Class 1 double track rail line runs east -west along the Missouri River in Jefferson City, connecting Kansas City, MO and St. Louis, MO. - Amtrack railway provides freight and passenger services. Prospective Transportation Projects The following highlights a major opportunity that will make Jefferson City's transportation environment unique in mid -Missouri. 221 Several partners in Jefferson City have been working to get an industrial/commercial port developed in Jefferson City. This facility would not be a recreational or marina facility, but focus on business transactions that would benefit from the multi -modal hub. In May of 2020 the Legislature passed a bill to transfer116 acres of state-owned property near the Missouri National Guard to the Heartland Port Authority of Central Missouri. Since Jefferson City is a retail and employment center in mid -Missouri, Activate Jefferson City2040 supports any activity that increases commercial and industrial activity in the community. Compliance with the City of Jefferson's floodplain management code requirements must be incorporated from planning stages, through construction, and continue during operation. Hopefully, the contents of this plan can be used by the port authority to help supportthe project development. Chapter 5: Transportation 49 Jefferson City Thoroughfare Plan A municipality uses a thoroughfare plan to target roadway rehabilitation, improvements, and expansion throughout the community. Ensuring efficient capacity of the street network can accommodate activity and future growth. This is key for economic sustainability in Jefferson City. Recommendations from CAMPO 2045 & Beyond Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP), the updated Travel Demand Model (TDM) Table 2: Local Road Classification Criteria completed in 2019, and additional stakeholder input was used to produce the Jefferson City Thoroughfare Plan. The 2010 Cole County Master Plan, 2017 CAMPO Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan, and the 2017 Coordinated Public Transit - Human Services Transportation Plan also contributed to this analysis. Street System and Classifications The movement of vehicular and truck traffic is dependent on quality connections in the street network. The street network is a mixture of arterial, collector, and local routes. An efficient number and type of route in a street network benefits residential, commercial, entertainment, and industrial uses. Table 2 describes the different types of roadway facilities key to a street network. Type Width AADT Access Qualitative Description Freeways & Expressway _ N T 10,000< > -a D a o -o —> >. °' o points a v These routes are federally classified and part of the Federal Aid System. These routes look very similar to Interstates and have directional travel lanes that are usually separated by some type of physical barrier. Access and egress are limited to on- and off -ramp locations or a very limited number of at -grade intersections. These roadways are designated and constructed to maximize mobility function, and abutting land uses are not directly served by them. Major Arterial 10,000 - 2,500 Partially/ Uncontrolled These routes are federally classified and part of the Federal Aid System. These routes serve major activity centers, high traffic volume corridors, and carry a high proportion of total travel on a minimum of mileage. These roads interconnect and provide continuity for major corridors to accommodate movements through and within the urban area, central business district, and outlying residential areas. Minor Arterial N 0 10,000 - 2,500 IUndivided a) o oo These routes are usually federally classified and part of the Federal Aid System. These routes provide service for trips of moderate length, serve geographic areas that are smaller than their higher arterial counterparts, and offer connectivity to the higher arterial system. Minor arterials provide more land access than major arterials without penetrating identifiable neighborhoods and provide connections for rural collectors. Major Collector 3,000 oo 0 These routes may be federally classified and part Collectors gather traffic from local roads and funnel of the Federal Aid System. Generally, serve higher them into the arterial network. They serve both land density areas, in length >3/4 miles and >900 AADT. access and traffic circulation in commercial/industrial Minor Collector r o _ areas and penetrate residential neighborhoods. These routes usually are not federally classified or Operating characteristics generally include higher part of the Federal Aid System. Generally, serve lower speeds and more signalized intersections. density areas, in length <3/4 miles and <900 AADT. Local o ob <500 These routes are not federally classified or part of the Federal Aid System. These routes are generally not intended for use in long distance travel and are often designed to discourage through traffic. As public roads, they should be accessible for the public use throughout the year. 50 Chapter 5: Transportation Local Functional Classification Freeway/Expressway Major Arterial Minor Arterial Major Collector Minor Collector Local Road 1N Acitivate Jefferson City 2040 tr Chapter 5: Transportation 51 Future Roads The following highlights potential road construction or improvement projects, also review Map 7. Numbers do not represent priority. Funding and jurisdiction ultimately effect implementation of these projects. 1. Miller Street Connection - Construction ofa connection linking two disconnected segments of Miller Street creating a through street. The connection would result in a segment of Miller Street being classified as a major collector. 2. Schotthill Woods Drive extension to Schott Road - Eastern extension of Schotthill Woods Drive from its current terminous to Schott Road. The extension would be classified as a major collector or minor arterial, depending on future development. 3. Missouri State Penitentiary Parkway - Connection between Lafayette Street and Chestnut providing access across the Missouri State Penitentiary Redevelopment site. The connection would be classified a minor collector. 4. Cavalier Drive to Stadium Boulevard connection - The connection would create through access at the western terminous of Cathedral Rock Drive. The connection would be classified a minor collector. 5. Stoneridge Parkway extension to W. Edgewood Drive - Southern extension of Stoneridge Parkway from the roundabout to W. Edgewood Drive. The extension would be classified as a minor arterial and include 4 lanes with intermittent landscaped medians and centerturn lanes, similar to the existing northern portion. 6. S. Summit Drive ramp additions - Construction of east bound and north bound ramps connecting US 54 to S. Summit Drive in Callaway County. The ramps would complete the existing overpass. 7. Militia Drive extension to Liberty Road - Southern extension of Militia Drive from US 63 to Liberty Road. The extension would be classified as a major collector or minor arterial. 8. Wildwood Drive extension to Rock Ridge Road - Southern extension of Wildwood Drive from W. Edgewood Drive to Rock Ridge Road. The extension would be classified as a minor arterial. 9. Wildwood Drive extension to Route C - Continued southern extension of Wildwood Drive from Rock Ridge Road to Route C. The extension would be classified as a minor arterial. 10. Mission Drive extension to Rock Ridge Road - Connection between Mission Drive and MO 179. This connection was identified in the 2019 CAMPO Travel Demand Model. It is unknown how this connection will develop and the project would likely occur in phases. CAMPO Travel Demand Model (TDM): When updating the CAMPO area TDM, safety/ capacity and intersection/interchange improvements were among some of the most discussed topics. When combined with the stakeholder analysis, the map on the left depicts how the stakeholder data and growth models were used to analyze Level of Service (LOS) in the CAMPO region. For more information about the TDM, review Appendix H of CAMPO 2045 & Beyond. 52 Chapter 5: Transportation Upgrades to Existing Roads The following highlights potential upgrades to existing roads, also review Map 7. Numbers do not represent priority. Funding and jurisdiction ultimately effect implementation of these projects. 11. US 63/54 north of the Missouri River Bridge - Creation of a third eastbound and westbound lane, between the Missouri River Bridge and the ramps at the divergence of US 63 and US 54. The project would likely include a re -configuration of the Route W and US 63/54 overpass. 12. US 50/63 Rex Whitton Expressway - Improvements to capacity and traffic controls between US 54 and Lafayette Street. 13. US 50/54/63 Tri-Level - Reconfiguration of interchange to provide non -conflicting system -to -system movements. 14. Scott Station Road (city limits to Willowbrook Drive) 15. Henwick Lane (Rainbow Drive to Gary Lane) 16. Rainbow Drive (Paradigm Drive to Binder Lake Road) In numbers 14,15, and 16, improvements will feature construction of a curb and gutter, stormwater improvements, and new pavement. 17. Bald Hill Road (Eastland Drive to Rolling Hills Road) 18. Tanner Bridge Road (Route B to Friendship Lane) In 17 and 18, safety improvements, including: shoulder widening, horizontal and vertical alignment improvements, right-of-way clearing for better sight distance, and improved signing. 19. Monroe Street - Widening to convert street from one-way to two-way. Chapter 5: Transportation 53 N YICK LN St mary's Hospital North Jefferson Gt� creation Area City 11 U Memorall Airport Missouri State Capitol Adrian's Island 3 Map 7 Thoroughfare Plan )r9 / O Callawa County Cote County Missouri ■ National Guard Headquarter RI( TY to Taos Future Major Roads I. Miller Street Connection 2. Schotthill Woods Drive Extension to Schott Road 3. Missouri State Penitentiary Parkway 4. Cavalier Drive to Stadium Boulevard Connection 5. Stoneridge Parkway Extension to W. Edgewood Drive 6. S. Summit Drive Ramp Additions 7. Militia Drive Extension to Liberty Road 8. Wildwood Extension to Rock Ridge Road 9. Wildwood Extension to Route C 10. Mission Drive Extension to Rock Ridge Road Upgrades to Existing Roads 1 1 . US 63/54 North of Missouri River Bridge 12. US 50/63 Rex Whitton Expressway 13. US 50/54/63 Tri-Level 14. Scott Station Road 15. Henwick Lane 16. Rainbow Drive 17. Bald Hill Road I8.Tanner Bridge Road 19. Monroe Street Note: Numbers do not represent priority Acitivate Jefferson City 2040 Local Functional Classification Freeway/Expressway Major Arterial - Minor Arterial Major Collector Minor Collector Local Road 54 Chapter 5: Transportation Livable Street Improvements In 2020, the City of Jefferson revised Chapter 32 of the municipal code, incorporating guidance about livable streets into street, sidewalk, and right-of-way development. Livable streets, or complete streets, serve a variety of automotive, pedestrian, and nonautomotive needs. Such accommodation is beneficial for all people or organizations and businesses who rely on connecting individuals with goods, services, and resources. With livable streets commercial traffic is connected and users can safely use sidewalks, cross streets, travel to work, and access recreation. Livable streets may include, - Sidewalk on both sides of the street, with appropriate lighting. - Bike lanes or sharrows. - Public transportation routes, with appropriate infrastructure such as benches, bus stop shelters, etc. - Marked crosswalks. - Speed controlling systems such as curb cuts, median islands, street trees or landscaping buffers, ect. - Wayfinding signage. - Green infrastructure. It is crucial for major corridors, such as Missouri Blvd, to serve the needs of all types of residents and visitors regardless oftheir transportation preferences or lifestyle. However, not all roadways are appropriate for livable streets implementation. Topography or certain road classifications can affect if a route receives livable streets implementation. Ensuring thatfunctional and beautiful corridors exist in Jefferson City will increase the quality of life for residents and visitors. Figure 11: Livable Street - Example Image Source: streetmix.net, enhancements by author Sidewalk with landscaped buffer and bus shelter. Dedicated turn lane with small concrete median, controlling traffic flow and movement between destinations 1111111 P Concrete median, controlling speeds and reducing collisions from opposing traffic. r. INV r Two lanes of traffic, one of them accommodating bus and bicycle traffic. Chapter 5: Transportation 55 Transportation Goals Principle Efficient and safe transportation systems are vital to local and regional quality of life factors. Goal: Strengthen Jefferson City as a vibrant regional hub through intermodal connections. Goal: Promote an accessible and well- connected Jefferson City. Goal: Provide Jefferson City residents and visitors with a transportation system that serves their needs. Objectives: > Utilize access to the Missouri River for recreation and commercial transportation purposes. > Support diverse regional transportation connections throughout mid -Missouri. Objectives: > Encourage multi -modal transportation options in Jefferson City. > Extend local connections to improve mobility. Objectives: > Ensure that the transportation system efficiently connects residential areas with employment/commercial centers. Chapter 5: Transportation 57 Transpo rta tion Principle: Efficient and safe transportatio n systems are vital to local and regional quality of life factors . Goal C2: Promote an accessible and well-connected Je ffe rso n City. Objectives: > Enco urage multi -modal transportatio n options in Jeffe rson City. > Extend lo cal connectio ns to impro ve mobility. Strategies Details Corresp onding Theme(s) Reev aluate parking requirements in the Jefferso n City Zo ning Co de, inclu ding, but not limited to ; O ff-street arkin for redevelo ment and infill rojects. parking P P - Shared parking allo wances. - Ex ceptio ns to the number of required parking spaces fo r unique properties. - Parking lo t mate rials to mitigate stormwater. - Minimum number of spaces for specific uses. Time: Medium -Term Anti cipated Partners: City ofJ effers on bQd - 4 U Expand the bicycle and pedestrian netwo rk by connec ting recreation and e ssential ro utes to gethe r. Time: Long -T erm Anticipated Partners: City ofJefferson •1 Identify areas in Jefferson City where livable streets sho uld be imple me nte d. Make sure to prio ritize, -Areasripefordevelo pmento rredevelo pment,focusingo nreorienting buildings and pedestrian feature s to wards the stree t as o pposed to parking lo ts fronting the street. - Educational node s, higher and lower education. - Healthcare nodes. Time: Medium -Term Anticipated Partners: City ofJefferson Resour ce R oadmap: pg137, 139 4 p 116 Chapter 9: Acti on Plan Transportation Principle: Efficient and safe transportation systems are vital to local and regional quality of life factors. Goal C2: Promote an accessible and well-connected Jefferson City. Objectives: > Encourage multi -modal transportation options in Jefferson City. > Extend local connections to improve mobility. Strategies Details CorrespondingTheme(s) Construct and repair sidewalks to achieve greater compliance with Americans with Disabilities Act standards. Time: Medium -Term Anticipated Partners: Missouri Department of Transportation City ofJefferson o c a Seek innovative and supplementary funding sources in order to efficiently improve road and bridge infrastructure, public transportation facilities, and service hours for public transportation. Time: Ongoing Anticipated Partners: City ofJefferson Central Missouri Community Action d D Chapter 9: Action Plan 117 Transportation Principle: Efficient and safe transportation systems are vital to local and regional quality of life factors. Goal C3: Provide Jefferson City residents and visitors with a transportation system that serves their needs. Objectives: > Ensure that the transportation system efficiently connects residential areas with employment/commercial centers. Strategies Details Corresponding Theme(s) Continue to partner with transportation stakeholders to enhance transportation infrastructure and connections in the region. Time: Ongoing Anticipated Partners: City ofJefferson D Continue to make improvements to the JEFFTRAN system including service areas, infrastructure and equipment, hours of operation, and eduction materials. Time: Ongoing Anticipated Partners: City ofJefferson 4 p Develop a corridor study and plan for Missouri Blvd. Time: Medium -Term Anticipated Partners: City ofJefferson Missouri Department ofTransportation d p Encourage the siting of electric car stations throughout Jefferson City. Time: Long -Term Anticipated Partners: City ofJefferson It4 118 Chapter 9: Action Plan Transportation Goals: - Strengthen Jefferson City as a vibrant regional hub through intermodal connections. Promote an accessible and well-connected Jefferson City. - Provide Jefferson City residents and visitors with a transportation system that serves their needs. Pathway to success: One quantitative measure to track "Transportation" chapter goals includes the Walkability Index. The diagram below identifies a benchmark for 2040, Jefferson City's Walkability Index increasing. In 2010, most ofJefferson City had a below average or least walkable index score. More of the city with an above average walkable score suggests an increase in pedestrian infrastructure and an improved culture surrounding non - Figure 19: Measuring"Transportation" Success 35 30 R2 25 C) a Q - 20 15 10 5 1.33sgmi 36.25 sq mi - Additional 1.82sgmi - designated "walkable, above average" 2010 personal automotive options. Definitions: Walkability Index - a score based upon characteristics of the built environment that influence the likelihood of walking being used as a mode of travel. Sources: US Environmental Protection Agency National Walkability Index Interactive Map Viewer 3.15 sq mi 2040 Target Walkable, above I Walkable, below average average or least 4.43 sq 142 Chapterl0:Annual Reporting Capital Culture and Healthy Living Goals: - Enhance Jefferson City's culture, focusing on diversity and quality of place. - Sustain a thriving and diverse parks and recreation system. - Increase access to social well-being and physical health amenities. Pathway to success: Quantitative measures that showcase progress related to this theme include food insecurity and miles of Greenway.The reduction offood insecure residents in Jefferson City suggests that more people have access to healthy foods. The increase of Greenway suggest that residents have access to healthy lifestyle amenities. This amenity also fulfills "Environmental Resiliency" and "Transportation" chapter goals. Figure 21: Measuring "Capital Culture and Healthy Living" Success Dropping 19.2% to be 40 12% — closer to the national average. 35 1096 8% 6% — 4% 2% — 2.018 2040 Target kb Percent of food insecure residents 30 25 20 From a qualitative perspective, a decrease in weapons offenses and increase in historic preservation activities highlight achievement towards action items set forth in this comprehensive plan.Adecrease in the amount of reported weapons offenses suggests safer city center neighborhoods, where most of the weapons offenses take place. Paired with appropriate revitalization, redevelopment, and historic preservation efforts; creating safer city center neighborhoods also fulfills "Housing & Neighborhood" and "Economic Development" chapter goals. Definitions: Food insecurity - access to adequate food for active and healthy living is limited by lack of money and other resources (example, location of healthy options). 15 — 10 5 2018 2040 Target ■ Miles of Greenway Community Engagement Results: 80% of responses from the Parks, Recreation, & Forestry Master Plan community survey indicated that walking and biking trails are the most important parks and recreation facility. Sources: USDA. In 2019, 89.5% of U.S. households were food secure throughout the year. The remaining 10.5% of households were food insecure at least some time during the year, including 4.1% that had a very low food security. Increase in Historic Preservation Activities For example, - Local landmark designations. - Architectural surveys. - National Registerdesignations, Chapter10: Annual Reporting 145 7 Eco no mic su cce ss depends on Je fferson City ac co mmo dating gro wth an d demand 80% --- _ . 7896 70% 60% 50% §. 40% 0 30% -- 20% 10% 0% Agree 9 Quality of life, In Jefferson City, is affected by accessibility to parks, re creati on trends. fadlities, and open space. 100 % - 14% Neu tral 90 % 80 % 70 % 60% n 50% m 40 % 30% 20% 8% 5% 10 % 0% Disagree Don't Kno w 8 Jefferson City is efficie ntly connected to region al activ ity centers and co mmunities in 35% 30% 25% 20% cy 15% 10% I Agree 1 Neutral 496 1% Disagree D on't K now 10.A Je fferson City h as transportati on infrastru ct ur e/s ervic es connecting j obs and other mid -Misso uri. needed services (recreation and daily life needs). 50% 28% Agree Neutral 27% Disagree 15% Don't Kno w 45% 44 % 40 % 35% u)30% g 25 % 0 20% 28 % Agre e N eutral Disagree D on't Know 152 Appendix B 10.B Please Indicate how satisfied you are with the following transportation issues. Satisfied Condition of roadways Availability of 5% sidewalks 13% Moderately Dissatisfied Satisfied SO% 45% 35% 48% Condition of 9% 45% 44% sidewalks Availability of bike 21% 26% 34% lanes Quality of bike and 25% 28% 10% scooter share program (SPIN) Accessibility/safety 14% 37% 33% of sidewalks or bike lanes Public 13% 21% 38% transportation (bus) service 11.A Quality of life, in Jefferson City, is affected by accessibility to healthy and locally grown food options. 70% 60% . ._.._ 50% -- 40% oc a 30% 20% 10% 0% 61% Agree Neutral 6% Disagree Don't Know 11.B Quality of life, in Jefferson City, is affected by accessibility to arts and cultural amenities. 80% 70% 60% 50% a 40% cc 30% 20% 10% 0% 72% Agree 15% 10% 3% NMI Neutral Disagree Don't Know 12.A Access to a variety of quality public services is a strength of Jefferson City. 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% a, 20% cc 39% Agree 3496 Neutral 14% 14% • Disagree Don't Know Appendix B 153 CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTAION PLAN ILLUSTRATIVE PROJECTS For illustrative purposes, the financial plan includes additional projects that could be completed if additional resources beyond those identified in the financial plan were to become available. Some items on these lists have cost estimates or cost ranges associated with them. This section of the MTP includes: 1. Programmatic Illustrative Projects — Approved by the Board of Directors and Technical Committee as broad regional or statewide needs. 2. Illustrative Site Specific Projects —Projects in this list were developed by a stakeholder workgroup and then reviewed and approved by Technical Committee and Board of Directors using the Tier system outlined below. 3. JEFFTRAN Program of Projects — An Illustrative list of transit projects that may be completed in the next 5 to 10 years dependent upon the Jefferson City annual budget and availability of federal funds. 4. Future Roads — Please refer to the CAMPO Major Thoroughfare Plan (Adopted 08/19/2021), located in Appendix J. Additional illustrative projects can be found in the other adopted CAMPO plans in the appendices. Most of the illustrative items found in those plans are reflected in the lists below. Other plans that have identified potential illustrative projects include: • 2021 CAMPO Major Thoroughfare Plan — Appendix J • 2016 Capital Area Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan - Appendix F • 2017 Coordinated Public Transit -Human Services Transportation Plan - Appendix G • 2015 CAMPO Regional Wayfinding Plan - Appendix I PROGRAMMATIC ILLUSTRATIVE PROJECTS In addition to the site specific projects listed later in this section, there are other projects that have been identified as a need in the region that may require a shift in funding allocation at the state or local level. Figure 6.6 provides a list of programmatic illustrative projects. Figure 6.6 Programmatic Illustrative Projects Category Project Pedestrian & Non - Motorized System Performance System Performance System Performance System Performance/ Pedestrian & Non- Motorized Multi -Modal System Performance Increase funding to support safety improvements to pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure at the local level. Fund the upgrade of US 50 to four lanes to provide an alternative route to Interstate 70. Fund expansion and improvements to Interstate 70 including replacement of the Rocheport bridge over the Missouri River. Fund expansion of shoulders (min 2' — 4') on Missouri numbered and lettered routes. Create/fund a safety improvement program for small cities with population of less than 5,000. The program would support small cities making safety (sidewalks, curb/gutter, crosswalk, signage, etc.) improvements along state highways that run through their town. Transit Capital and Operating Program — maintain and/or increase current level of service for urban and rural public transportation. Increase funding for roadway and bridge maintenance to keep infrastructure good and safe condition. CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN 100 ILLUSTRATIVE SITE SPECIFIC PROJECTS This site specific list of illustrative projects were developed by a stakeholder workgroup and then reviewed and approved by Technical Committee and Board of Directors using the Tier system outlined below. •Regionally Significant: Impacting network users from outside the region and having major impacts on freight movement moving through the region •Recognized as a high priority by Board of Directors, stakeholders, and public •Supported by the 2045 Travel Demand Model •Supports increased motorized and non -motorized safety and system performance •Intersections and interchanges with high numbers of crashes TIER 2 •Recognized as a high priority by Board of Directors, stakeholders, and public •Most projects in this Tier are supported by the Travel Demand Model •Supports increased motorized and non -motorized safety and system performance •Intersections and interchanges with high numbers of crashes TIER 3 •Designated as a need by stakeholders and general public •Some projects in this tier are supported by the Travel Demand Model •Projects in this tier may be completed in phases, dramatically changing cost and date of completion •Supports increased motorized and non -motorized safety and system performance •Intersections and interchanges with high numbers of crashes Note: The reference numbers used in the following tables and maps do not denote priority. This number is just a reference number. CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN 101 Figure 6.7A Illustrative Projects - System Performance Illustrative Projects Category: System Performance C • • Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 City Limits Q CAMPO Boundary Source: CAMPO Source: CAMPO Figure 6.7B Illustrative Projects - System Performance - Tier 1 Jurisdiction Jefferson City Jefferson City Jefferson City Location US 54/63/94 (Bluff Rd) US 50/63, US 54 to Lafayette St US 50 / 63 /54 (Tri-Level) Project Description Term Cost Range Construct direct connector for Long -Term $10M< northbound -to -westbound movement to 10 years< improve capacity; widen US 54/63 to provide 3 continuous through lanes in each direction (in addition to auxiliary/acceleration/deceleration lanes) Implement major capacity improvements, Long -Term $10M< which could include mainline widening, 10 years< grade separations, and/or outer roads Reconfigure interchange to provide non- Long -Term $5M -$10M conflicting system -to -system movements 10 years< CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN 102 Fi • ure 6.7C Illustrative Pro'ects — S System Performance - Tier 2 4 Jurisdiction Callaway County Jefferson City Jefferson City Jefferson City Jefferson City Jefferson City Location US 54 / S. Summit Dr. Ramps US 50 / Dix Rd West Edgewood @ Stadium Missouri Blvd, Eastern Lowe's entrance to S 10 Mile Dr W. Truman Blvd @ Scott Station Rd US -54 NB Ramps / Christy Dr / Stadium / Jefferson St Wardsville Route B, Ashbury Way to Route M Jefferson US 54 / Ellis Blvd City / Southwest Blvd Jefferson City Jefferson City Jefferson City Jefferson City Jefferson City Jefferson City Jefferson City Holts Summit Jefferson City Southwest Blvd @ Stadium Ellis BI / Green Berry Rd Bald Hill Rd / Seven Hills Rd US SO /Truman B1/ Country Club Dr West Edgewood @ Creek Trail Missouri Blvd, Country Club Dr to Howerton Country Club Dr, Truman Blvd to Rainbow Dr US 54 / Route 00 / Simon Blvd Missouri Blvd, Stoneridge Pkwy to US 50 stem Performance — Tier 2 Project Description Addition of ramps to westbound and eastbound US 54 completing the S. Summit Dr. overpass Term Cost Range Long -Term $1M -$5M 10 years< Reconfigure interchange and Dix Rd approaches to address capacity issues including lack of left -turn lanes; consider dumbbell roundabout interchange; widen Dix Rd to provide center turn lane and pedestrian access from US 50 to Missouri Blvd Install roundabout to improve intersection capacity Address access management along the corridor, including turn restrictions, additional traffic control, and safety. Signalize or otherwise enhance capacity Near -Term $5M -$10M 5-10 years Near -Term $500k -$5M 5-10 years Near -Term $1M -$10M 5-10 years Near -Term < $500k 5-10 years Install roundabouts at both hook ramp intersections to Near -Term $1M -$10M improve operations and address offsets/angles 5-10 years Install roundabout at Rte B / Falcon / Ashbury and Near -Term $1M -$5M intersection improvements to Rte 8 / Rte M/ Rte W. 5-10 years Reconfigure interchange to address capacity and close Near -Term $5M -$10M spacing of outer roads. Create pedestrian connection 5-10 years on Southwest/Ellis Blvd from Ford St to Southridge Dr Install roundabout to improve intersection capacity Near -Term $500k -$5M 5-10 years Install roundabout to improve intersection capacity Near -Term $500k -$5M 5-10 years Install roundabout to improve intersection capacity Near -Term $500k -$5M 5-10 years Reconfigure interchange to address close outer road Near -Term $5M -$10M spacing; widen westbound off -ramp to improve 5-10 years capacity; incorporate pedestrian facilities into the interchange Install roundabout to improve intersection capacity Near -Term $500k -$5M 5-10 years Widen to 5 lanes; including right turn lane at Howerton Long -Term $5M -$10M Ct. 10 years< Widen to provide left -turn lanes at existing and future Long -Term $1M -$5M access points 10 years< Reconfigure interchange to address close outer road Long -Term $5M -$10M spacing and capacity issues (may involve roundabouts); 10 years< incorporate pedestrian facilities crossing US 54 Improve access management along Missouri Blvd, including improvements to intersections, restrictions to turning movements, and improvements to pedestrian safety. Long -Term $5M -$10M 10 years< CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN 103 Figure 6.7D Illustrative Projects - System Performance - Tier 3 System Performance - Tier 3 Jurisdiction Location Jefferson City Madison Street, Dunklin St to US -54 Ramps Jefferson City US 50/63 / Clark Ave Project Description Term Add a center turn lane via a combination of widening and parking removal; address unusual stop control configuration at Madison Atchison Cost Range Near -Term $1M -$5M 5-10 years Reconfigure interchange to address ramp terminal capacity (likely roundabouts); include modifications to Clark/Miller and Clark/Dunklin intersections to improve corridor operations Improve interchange capacity and east -side Long -Term $1M -$10M outer road spacing with roundabouts at 10 years< terminals Near -Term $1M -$10M 5-10 years Holts Summit US 54/ Center St Cole County Rock Ridge Rd / Wildwood Dr extension Add left-tum lane on Rock Ridge to improve capacity after completion of extension Jefferson MO 179, Industrial City Dr to Sue Dr Add left -turn lanes at Sue Dr, Cherry Creek Ct, and Fire Station north driveway Jefferson City MO 179 and Truman Blvd Long -Term $1M -$5M 10 years< Long -Term $500k -$5M 10 years< Reconfigure intersection with roundabout 36 Cole County Bridge Replacement /Tanner Bridge Rd Bridge Replacement on Tanner Bridge Rd. over Moreau River Wardsville Iii Jefferson City Route B, Tanner Bridge Rd to Friendship Rd Long -Term $1M -$5M 10 years< Near -Term $1M -$5M 5-10 years Install roundabouts at two locations to improve Near -Term $5M -$10M capacity: Rte B / Falcon / Ashbury, Rte B / Rte 5-10 years M; widen to four lanes in each direction on Rte B for several hundred feet south of Tanner Bridge Rd and reconfigure intersection; Widen Rte B to provide TWLT Reconfigure to fix sight distance issues; widen Long -Term $50K -$100k Swifts Hwy approach Swifts Hwy / Jefferson St 10 years< Holts Summit S. Summit Dr / Perrey Dr / Hibernia Ln / Holt Ln Redesign intersection to address offset and Near -Term N/A sight distance Holts Spalding Rd/ Park Summit Install drainage improvements. Curb and gutter could cause surface flooding for adjoining properties. Holts Summit N. Summit Dr and Mars St Intersection Install drainage improvements -box culvert. 5-10 years Near -Term N/A 5-10 years Near -Term N/A 5-10 years Holts Summit Van Horn Rd /Julie Redesign intersection to address offset and Ln sight distance Near -Term N/A 5-10 years St. Martins Route T/D & Bus 50 Reconfigure intersection with roundabout Near -Term $500k -$1M W Intersection 5-10 years Holts Nieman Rd / Halifax Summit Rd / Major Terr Address offset and skew by installing roundabout or realigning east leg Near -Term N/A 5-10 years Holts E Simon Blvd Summit Replace undersized culvert. Install new bridge Near -Term N/A -0.4 mi east of Jefferson Rd 5-10 years Install minimum 2 ft. shoulders along state routes M and Y in Taos Taos Routes M and Y shoulders Jefferson City High St. viaduct rehabilitation Rehabilitation of the High St. viaduct over Missouri Blvd. Near -Term $500k -$1M 5-10 years Long -Term $5M -$10M 10 years< CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN 104 C: RA DI rt. t:.,e D.�in�te _ M,.Iti_Mn,IaI Source: CAMPO Illustrative Projects Category: Multi -Modal CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN 105 Figure 6.8B Illustrative Projects — Multi -Modal — Tier 2 Multi -Modal - Tier 2 19 20 Jurisdiction Jefferson City Jefferson City Jefferson City/ Cole County/ Callaway County Jefferson City Jefferson City Jefferson City Jefferson City Location JEFFTRAN Transit Facilities Jefferson City Amtrak Station Missouri River Port Jefferson City Memorial Airport Jefferson City Memorial Airport Jefferson City Memorial Airport Jefferson City Memorial Airport Project Description Construction of a new facilities for JEFFTRAN that would provide better accommodations for transit riders and staff, including, but not limited to; a bus barn, washing bays, central maintenance facilities, and administrative offices Renovation or replacement of the Amtrak Train Station in Jefferson City Construction of a port facility in either Callaway County or Cole County as specified in the Central Missouri Multimodal Port Feasibility Study. Reconstruction of Runway 9/27 Construction of new air traffic control tower. Rehabilitate Facility Housing ARFF/SRE Equipment Reconstruction of Taxiway A. Figure 6.8C Illustrative Projects — Multi -Modal — Tier 3 Term Cost Range Near -Term $5M -$10M 5-10 years Long -Term <$100M 10 years< Near -Term $10M< 5-10 years Near -Term $1M -$5M 5-10 years Near -Term $1M -$5M 5-10 years Near -Term $500k -$1M 5-10 years Near -Term $5M -$10M 5-10 years Multi -Modal - Tier 3 Jurisdiction Jefferson City Jefferson City Location Jefferson City Memorial Airport - Runway 9 and 9/27 Jefferson City Memorial Airport - Runway 12/30 Project Description Relocate Runway 9 and Extend Runway 9/27 at the Jefferson City Memorial Airport. Term Cost Range Long- $5M -$10M Term 10 years< Extension and Widening of runway 12/30 Long- $10M< at the Jefferson City Memorial Airport. Term 10 years< CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN 106 Figure 6.9A Illustrative Projects - Pedestrian and Non -Motorized r Illustrative Projects Category: Pedestrian & Non -Motorized • • Tier 2 Tier 3 City Limits CAMPO Boundary Source: CAMPO St. Martins NI S Miles r" i,14W4t' 161 B4 AA Taos Source: CAMPO CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN 107 Figure 6.9B Illustrative Projects — Pedestrian & Non -Motorized — Tier 2 Pedestrian & Non -Motorized - Tier 2 11 Jurisdiction 10 Location Holts Summit S. Summit Drive, Simon to Center Jefferson City Missouri Blvd, W. Main St. to Stadium Blvd. and drop inlets Project Description Term Cost Range Install sidewalks with some curb and gutter Long- $500K -$1M Term 10 years< Complete connectivity between segments Near- $1M -$5M of sidewalk and install Term 5- crosswalks/pedestrian refuges as needed. 10 years Figure 6.9C Illustrative Projects — Pedestrian & Non -Motorized — Tier 3 Pedestrian & Non -Motorized - Tier 3 Q 24 44 45 46 50 54 59 Jurisdiction Jefferson City Jefferson City Jefferson City St. Martins/ Cole County Holts Summit Holts Summit St. Martins/ Cole County CAMPO Location Bolivar St. Greenway Southwest Blvd & Dix Rd Intersection Dix Road, W. Main to Missouri Blvd Route T, Bus 50 to Elston Karen Dr, Center to Thompson Halifax Rd, Center to Nieman Route T, Henwick Ln to Bus 50 W Bike lane installation in CAMPO Region CAMPO CAMPO Greenway Connectivity Jefferson Jefferson City City Greenway Projects Jefferson City Taos Taos Missouri Blvd and S. Ten Mile, Stoneridge Pkwy to 5. Country Club Sidewalk expansion Trail Connectivity Project Description Design and construct a greenway extension from the Dunklin St. Trailhead to McCarty St. Install pedestrian -activated beacon or similar warning device Improve bicycle and pedestrian facilities along the corridor Install shoulders to accommodate cyclists and pedestrians. Install sidewalk and crosswalks Install sidewalk and crosswalks Install curb, gutter & sidewalk in each direction Continue expansion of bike lanes in the downtown area. Continue to expand greenways to connect cities in the CAMPO Region Locations may include; Fairgrounds Acres to County Park, South Country Club Drive to Turtle Creek subdivision, Ellis -Porter Riverside Park connector from St. Louis Road, Wears Creek to East Branch Connector, Frog Hollow Phase 4, Creek Trail to W. Edgewood Install Sidewalks and crosswalks along route with pedestrian accesss over MO 179 provided via a pedestrian bridge connecting S. Ten Mile east and west segments. Extend sidewalk along Route M north and south of existing sidewalk. Create sidewalk/trail connection between Route M sidewalk and Countryside Park trail. Term Cost Range Near -Term $500k -$1M 5-10 years Near -Term < $50K 5-10 years Near -Term < $500k 5-10 years Near -Term $5M -$10M 5-10 years Near -Term $500K -$1M 5-10 years Near -Term $500K -$1M 5-10 years Near -Term N/A 5-10 years Near -Term $50K -$100k 5-10 years Long -Term $10M< 10 years< Near -Term $50k -$1M 5-10 years Near -Term $1M -$5M 5-10 years Near -Term $1M -$5M 5-10 years Near -Term < $500k 5-10 years CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN 108 JEFFTRAN PROGRAM OF PROJECTS Figure 6.10 outlines an Illustrative list of transit projects that may be completed in the next 5 to 10 years dependent upon the Jefferson City annual budget and availability of federal funds. ure 6.10 Program Projects JEFFTRAN Program of Projects Other Local Description Total Cost Funding Funding 1 Replace paratransit wide body cutaway buses $150,000 $120,000 $30,000 2 Replace paratransit software and associated hardware $30,000 $24,000 $6,000 3 Replace low -floor minivan support vehicle $40,000 $0 $40,000 4 Replace transit administration vehicle $30,000 $30,000 5 Upgrade/replace fare card system $300,000 $240,000 $60,000 6 Repair Transfer Facility Roof (Bus Transfer Shelter) $12,000 $0 $12,000 7 Transit facility improvements --ridge cap/flashing replacements/roof repair on bus barn $50,000 $40,000 $10,000 8 Security upgrades for transit facilities $30,000 $24,000 $6,000 9 Replace outdated bus security camera systems $60,000 $48,000 $12,000 10 Update/revise Transit facilities feasibility study $150,000 $0 $150,000 11 Purchase and install bus shelters at various locations in Jefferson City $30,000 $24,000 $6,000 12 Transit facility improvements, including replace overhead doors and door operators $95,000 $76,000 $19,000 13 JEFFTRAN lighted signs for exterior of transit facilities $15,000 $12,000 $3,000 14 Purchase emergency back-up generator & switches for transit and CM facilities $100,000 $80,000 $20,000 15 Replace low -floor route buses $3,000,000 $2,400,000 $600,000 16 Construct new transit facilities and central maintenance facilities $7,000,000 $5,600,000 $1,400,000 17 Transit admin facility rehab $50,000 $40,000 $10,000 18 Purchase and install additional transit traveler kiosks (each) $15,000 $12,000 $3,000 19 Add bike racks at passenger transfer facilities and selected bus stops $5,000 $0 $5,000 20 Enhance/replace security systems for buses and transit facilities $20,000 $16,000 $4,000 21 Charging systems/electrical upgrades for buses $100,000 $80,000 $20,000 22 Add crosswalks to various locations around the city $60,000 $0 $60,000 23 Rehabilitate/replace bus wash facility $100,000 $80,000 $20,000 Source: JEFFTRAN March 2019 FUTURE ROADS Please refer to the CAMPO Major Thoroughfare Plan, located in Appendix J. CAMPO 2045 & BEYOND METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN 109 Capital Area Active Transportation Plan BP1: PROPOSED BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN NETWORK H ! ' • JiC.0 ll all L' h:pw.d OtYts. a ►.nk.bw %.1wr� Proposed Bicycle & Pedestrian Network SW1: SIDEWALK NETWORK t• t•ON.I Proposed Sidewalk Network BP2: PROJECT PACKAGES - BICYCLE & PEDESTRIAN NETWORK vn.t con.-.v.n.. v.ca.w. n�ar�I. 1.r Project Packages: Bicycle & Pedestrian Network J .l....•MY Fx,,gn SW2: SIDEWALK PACKAGES 'l-•1.'OA • r Project Packages: Side`valk Network • Memorandum 320 East McCarty Street • Jefferson City, Missouri 65101 • P: 573.634.6410 • F: 573.634.6562 • www.jeffersoncitymo.gov Date: September 11, 2023 To: Public Works and Planning Committee %,� From: David Bange P.E., City Engineer �r Subject: General Sidewalk Policy Discussion City staff is asking the Committee to discuss and provide comment and direction regarding the inconsistent nature of the City Code as it pertains to sidewalks. Chapter 32 Article III Division 2 of the City Code addresses the duties and responsibilities of property owners regarding sidewalks and curbs. Section 32-30 states "It is hereby made the duty of every property owner having property abutting on a public street to place and maintain a good and sufficient sidewalk and curb along such street and abutting the property..." Section 32-31 continues this theme by saying "The owner of any lot or tract of land within the City shall build and construct, rebuild or reconstruct and repair the sidewalk lying along and adjacent to his property,...". Section 32-34 follows with the same declaration ""It shall be the duty of all persons owning or occupying any property in the City to keep in repair and free from obstruction the sidewalk and gutters in front of such property." While these statements appear unequivocal they are followed by Section 32-35 which creates a deferral process and by the "Sidewalk Repair Program" contained within Division III of Chapter 32. This division of the Code describes a process by which the City Council may approve funding for the repair of existing sidewalks. Section 32-52 states that upon funding being identified staff is to identify areas for improvements to be made and return that list to the Council for approval or amendment at which point the code directs staff to see to the implementation of the repairs. It is of some interest that this division of the code ends with the statement that nothing within this section relives the property owner from their obligation to maintain good and sufficient sidewalk and curb. These two sections of the Code are at odds with each other with the former assigning the responsibility for the sidewalk to the property owner and the latter having the City taking on the cost and responsibility for the construction or reconstruction of the sidewalk. While this system provides for flexibility for Council action it also creates a situation which can be perceived as unfair, and in practice creates derision between those who do, and those who do not receive funding for sidewalks. It may also set up the expectation that if the sidewalk deteriorates far enough the City will come and fix it. In practice the City does build and rebuild sidewalks through road construction/reconstruction contracts as well as standalone sidewalk contracts. Recent examples of these include the Grant Street project and the Adams Street sidewalk project. In all such projects no funding is sought from the adjoining U:\PublicWorks\Engineering\dbange\PUBLIC WORKS & PLANNING1202319-20231Sidewalk Discussion.docx Memorandum 2 property owners. Conversely if someone calls with a sidewalk complaint that is outside of one of these project areas they are informed that it is the private responsibility of the adjoining property owner. This system has been in place for a number of years and so by its survival to this point may speak to its viability despite its apparent flaws. Certainly, any change to this Code or changes in its enforcement will have ramifications both to the City and individual property owners. A number of factors have brought this forward at this time, including the discussions of pedestrian access along Monroe Street during the debate concerning the second phase of that project, survey results from the Active Transportation Plan which indicate sidewalk repair as the number one priority of the respondents, and the final federal approval of the Public Right -of -Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG) that set the requirements for sidewalks and other assessable infrastructure in the right-of- way. If you have any questions or concerns I can be reached at 634-6433. U:1Public Works\EngineeringldbangelPUBLIC WORKS & PLANNING1202319-20231Sidewalk Discussion.docx 9/12/23, 3:10 PM Jefferson City, MO Code of Ordinances DIVISION 2. - DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF PROPERTY OWNERS Sec. 32-30. - Generally. It is hereby made the duty of every property owner having property abutting on a public street to place and maintain a good and sufficient sidewalk and curb along such street and abutting the property, when and as directed by the Director of Public Works in conformity with policies and procedures approved by the City Council. The Director shall require sidewalks to be constructed or repaired when any of the following conditions exist: 1. When a safety hazard exists; 2. Claim for injuries due to condition of sidewalks; 3. Need to connect to existing sidewalks; 4. When an ordinance requires construction. Corner Tots shall be liable for the extension of curbs and sidewalks to the curb line each way. Only such sidewalks as are described in this article shall be placed in the City. (Ord. No. 16023 , § 1,4-6-2020) Sec. 32-31. - Duty to construct, repair, etc. A. The owner of any lot or tract of land within the City shall build and construct, rebuild or reconstruct and repair the sidewalk lying along and adjacent to his property, and such property owner shall grade, fill and park that portion of the street lying between the property line and the street curb line, and build approaches. The term "approaches" shall be understood to mean the extension of sidewalks at corner lots, from the property line each way to the street curb line, being in fact the connection across the parkway or intervening space between the corner of the property and the crossing in the street including the construction of accessible ramps. B. Any such owner of any lot or tract of land within the City who, after having been duly notified in writing by the delivery by the Director of Public Works to such property owner of a written order directing such property owner to build or construct, rebuild or reconstruct or repair the sidewalk lying along and adjacent to his property, or grade, fill or park that portion of the street adjacent to his property and lying between the property line and the street curb line, shall fail, neglect or refuse to comply with the terms of such written order within 30 days from the delivery thereof shall be deemed guilty of an offence. (Ord. No. 16023 , § 1, 4-6-2020) Sec. 32-32. - Construction, repair, etc., under private contracts. about:blank 1/9 9/12/23, 3:10 PM Jefferson City, MO Code of Ordinances In any case where the Council desires to permit property owners to construct or repair sidewalks or to grade and park that portion of the street lying between the property line and the street curb line, under private contracts, the Council shall by resolution provide that sidewalks shall be constructed or that portion of the street lying between the property line and the street curb line shall be graded and parked upon any street specified, and that the property owners shall be allowed 30 days from the date of adoption of the resolution to construct such sidewalks or to grade and fill the parking herein described, under private contract. By such resolution, the Department of Public Works shall be directed to prepare plans and specifications for such improvements. Immediately after the adoption of such resolution, the Department of Public Works shall cause notice to be served upon the interested property owners of the adoption of such resolution and the time within which they must contract for the construction of the improvements named in such resolution. (Ord. No. 16023 , § 1, 4-6-2020) Sec. 32-33. - Construction by City. At the end of the time given property owners to construct or repair sidewalks that have been deemed hazardous or defective, or to grade and park that portion of the street lying between the property line and the street curb line, under private contract, the right to so construct such improvements shall cease, and the City Council shall enact an ordinance providing for the construction or reconstruction of such sidewalks, or for the grading or parking of that portion of the street lying between the property line and the street curb line, to be paid for with special tax bills. Before the City Council shall enact an ordinance providing for any improvement mentioned in this section, the Director of Public Works shall have prepared and filed with the City Clerk plans and specifications, and an estimate of the cost thereof, and such plans and specifications and estimate of cost shall have been duly approved according to law. The Director of Public Works shall keep an accurate record and account of the separate items thereof, and make a written report thereof to the City Council, and the City Council shall pay for all labor and material and all other costs of such work out of any funds the City may have available for such purpose. (Ord. No. 16023 , § 1,4-6-2020) Sec. 32-34. - Maintenance, etc. It shall be the duty of all persons owning or occupying any property in the City to keep in repair and free from obstruction the sidewalk and gutters in front of such property. Any person violating the provisions of this section shall be deemed guilty of an offence. (Ord. No. 16023. § 1,4-6-2020) Sec. 32-35. - Sidewalks required. about:blank 2/9 9/12/23, 3:10 PM Jefferson City, MO Code of Ordinances A. No permit shall be issued for the reconstruction or construction of a new building, or a building addition, or a new or expanded parking lot, unless a sidewalk exists adjacent to the property or unless the plans for the building or parking lot provide for the construction of such a sidewalk. The requirements of this section shall apply to reconstruction, cumulative building additions and parking lot expansions following adoption of this ordinance, but shall not apply to the rehabilitation or renovation of existing buildings or parking lots, or the construction of accessory buildings. Applicants may request a deferral of the requirement to construct sidewalks in accordance with paragraph C below provided however that the obligation of owners of tracts with street frontages of 350 linear feet or more shall be limited to either (1) expending at least five percent of the total project cost (i.e., site development and building costs) toward public sidewalks; or (2) constructing at least 50 linear feet of sidewalk, whichever is greater in cost, with the remaining obligation deferred. For this purpose, project costs shall be estimated using the R.S. Means construction cost data services. In the event that the application of this subsection A of this section would result in the construction of a sidewalk which is too short to have any practical use, the Director may reduce or eliminate the requirement, or extend the requirement to such an extent that a practical sidewalk can be built. B. Sidewalks shall be constructed in new minor subdivisions, as defined by chapter 33, Subdivision Code. C. Sidewalk deferral, application. 1. Any property owner required to construct sidewalks under the provisions of subsections A and B, above, may request a deferral of the requirement to construct sidewalks in accordance with this subparagraph C. 2. Upon application by the owner, the Director of Planning and Protective Services (referred to hereinafter in this chapter as "Director") may approve a deferral of sidewalks otherwise required by subsections A and B above, as provided herein. a. Applications for sidewalk deferral shall be completed on forms prescribed by the Director at the time of submittal of the site plan, when site plan approval is required, or if no site plan is required, with the building permit application. A copy of an application for a sidewalk deferral shall be provided to each member of the City Council immediately upon its submission. b. A decision on the deferral will be made within ten days of application submittal. If the Director fails to act on the application within ten days, the application will be deemed to have been approved. The Director's decision will be transmitted, in writing, to the owner of the property, to each member of the City Council, and lead project consultant, if about:blank 3/9 9/12/23, 3:10 PM Jefferson City, MO Code of Ordinances applicable. The Director shall be entitled to request additional information from the applicant as well as to extend the time period for a decision with the consent of the applicant. c. Appeals of the decision of the Director's decision shall be governed by paragraph E. 3. Deferrals may be applied retroactively to developments previously required to construct sidewalks, or to new developments, when the criteria for such deferral is met. 4. Sidewalk deferrals granted for one project or time frame do not guarantee that that sidewalk will never be required in a specific location. A location may be included in an amended sidewalk master plan or otherwise required to construct sidewalks, as the area develops, or as conditions change. 5. If the City has adopted a sidewalk master plan and the location is shown on the sidewalk master plan, at the time the application is submitted, as not having sidewalks required, no sidewalks shall be required and no deferral shall be necessary, provided that if no plan has been adopted then all areas shall be considered to have been designated as having sidewalks required. 6. Deferrals shall be granted when the Director finds that the location is designated to have sidewalks in the sidewalk master plan and one or more of the following conditions exist: a. The City has plans to construct sidewalks to serve the development, or plans to widen or reconstruct the adjacent street which would require replacement of the sidewalk within five years of the application for waiver deferral; or b. No curbs and gutters exist, and it is impossible to a reasonable degree of certainty to accurately predict the line and grade of future curbs and gutters; or c. The location is within an area zoned industrial and there currently are no sidewalks or pedestrian generators in the area, or d. An engineering analysis accepted by the Director demonstrates the terrain or other natural or geographic features of the location are such that it is not reasonable to construct sidewalks; or e. An engineering analysis accepted by the Director demonstrates an alternate pedestrian way within the site provides an acceptable alternative; or f. The development is proposed as very low residential density, consisting of single family dwellings on lots of one acre of more, provided such lots have street frontages of 350 feet or more; or g. The frontage is along (i) a State or federally designated route with a permitted speed in excess of 49 mph or (ii) a local street with a permitted speed in excess of 49 mph. h. about:blank 4/9 9112123, 3:10 PM Jefferson City, MO Code of Ordinances If the requirement of constructing a sidewalk as provided in this section would cause a property to lose all value, or construction of a sidewalk will make the property unusable for any practical purpose, or if the construction of a sidewalk would create an unusual hardship for the owner (that is a hardship which would not be incurred by similarly situated property owners) the Director may, upon the consent of the Public Works and Planning Committee, grant a deferral. 7. Procedures for, and effect of, deferral. a. If a deferral is granted, the landowner shall not be required to install sidewalks at the present time, but shall be required to install sidewalks within 12 months of notice from the City that sidewalks are now to be constructed and that the deferral has been terminated. b. Construction specifications shall be those applicable at the time the notice is issued. c. If the landowner does not construct sidewalks within 12 months of the notice, the City shall construct such sidewalk and shall bill the landowner for the full amount of the City's costs in doing so. If the landowner fails to pay the bill within 60 days the amount owed shall constitute a lien against the property. d. If a deferral is granted, the owner may as a condition of the deferral be required to grade the area in which the sidewalk would be located in preparation for a future sidewalk. e. If a deferral is granted, the deferral shall be considered to run with the land and any subsequent owner shall be entitled to rely on the same as well as assuming the same obligation to construct a sidewalk when requested to do so as provided in this chapter. The City Clerk shall record a notice, substantially similar to the noticed set forth below, with the County Recorder for each deferral: Notice of Deferral The real estate described in this Notice of Deferral was granted a deferral of the sidewalk requirements of the City of Jefferson, Missouri on , 20_. This deferral is subject to the conditions set forth in the City Code and are subject to change from time to time. The granting of a deferral of the sidewalk requirements is not a permanent waiver of sidewalk requirements for this real estate and does not mean that the sidewalk requirements will never be imposed for this real estate. This real estate may subsequently be included in an amended Sidewalk Master Plan or otherwise required to construct sidewalks, as the area develops, or as conditions change. The property affected is more particularly described as: [set forth legal description here] D. Appeal of denial of deferral. 1. about:blank 5,9 9/12/23, 3:10 PM Jefferson City, MO Code of Ordinances The denial of a deferral by the Director may be appealed to the Planning and Zoning Commission. a. applicant aggrieved by the decision of the Director may file a written appeal to the Planning and Zoning Commission, addressed to the City Clerk, within ten days of the decision of the Director; b. Upon receipt of the appeal, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall schedule a hearing on the appeal. c. The burden of proof at the hearing shall be upon the applicant to show that the applicant is eligible for the relief requested. 2. This decision of the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be final. E. Major subdivisions. The preceding subparagraphs notwithstanding, sidewalks shall be constructed in new major subdivisions (as defined by chapter 33, subdivision code) as follows, unless the owner requests, the Planning and Zoning Commission reviews and the Council approves, a variance under (1) or (2) below. For the purposes of this chapter, the term "new Major Subdivision" shall mean any subdivision approved by the Council after November 20, 2007. 1. When the Council determines in a major subdivision that, through submission of an engineering study that includes appropriate details such as cross -sections, grading plans, and requirements for sidewalks because of the presence of unusual circumstances or conditions, including without limitation, topographical conditions, and that the strict application of the requirements for sidewalks would either prevent, or present a serious obstacle to the formation of a plat for the reasonable use and development of land, the Council may permit the owner to vary from the requirements for sidewalks or the location thereof. 2. The Council may permit a developer to vary from the requirement for sidewalks if the Commission determines that an alternate pedestrian way plan submitted by the developer with the preliminary plat provides adequate access throughout the subdivision. Such a plan must provide a continuous system of paved walkways located within easements dedicated as pedestrian ways. The Council may require such width not to exceed ten feet and such illumination as may be appropriate to assure safety. F. Construction standards. 1. Sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance with the following street classifications. Street classifications and location of sidewalks on local or cul-de-sac streets shall be determined by the Director: Street Type Sidewalk Requirement Sidewalk Width Arterial Both sides 5 feet about:blank 6/9 9/12/23, 3:10 PM Jefferson City, MO Code of Ordinances Collector Both sides 5 feet Local commercial or commercial cul-de-sac Both sides 5 feet Residential cul-de-sac or local street One side 4 feet 2. Sidewalks shall be located a minimum of three feet from the back of the curb where possible, or other location as approved by the Director. 3. Sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance with the latest edition of the City of Jefferson Standard Construction Drawings on file in the Department of Public Works. G. Time for construction. 1. The developer shall install all sidewalks, as required by this section, or by the Council pursuant to a variance as allowed by this section, not later than two years after the date when the abutting street is accepted or not later than five years after the first building permit is issued, whichever comes first; provided however, that the sidewalk for each lot within a subdivision shall be completed and approved before an occupancy permit for a structure on the lot is issued. 2. No certificate of occupancy shall be issued for any building or parking lot for which a sidewalk is required unless the sidewalk has been constructed or the property owner has provided a bond, cash escrow or letter of credit or other instrument acceptable to the Director of Planning and Protective Services guaranteeing construction of the sidewalk within not more than six months of issuance of the certificate of occupancy. H. Enforcement. '1. If the sidewalks required by this section, or alternate paved walkways required by the Council pursuant to a variance as allowed by this section, are not completed within two years from the date abutting streets are accepted, or within five years after the first building permit is issued, whichever comes first, the building official shall decline to issue any further permits of any type to the developer in conjunction with the subdivision where the violation is occurring, or in conjunction with any other activity at any location requiring permits by the building official, until the violation is cured. In addition, the Council may impose a penalty on the developer, in an amount not to exceed one hundred dollars per day for each day the violation persists. 2. Cause the sidewalks to be completed at the City's expense, and may cause a special tax bill to issue as to each lot within the subdivision for which the City has incurred the expense of constructing sidewalks, in an amount of two times such expense incurred, together with the about:blank 7/9 9112123, 3:10 PM Jefferson City, MO Code of Ordinances amount of any penalties accrued under subsection a, above. Any special tax bill issued pursuant to this subsection may be enforced in the same manner as a tax bill issued for the improvement of a sidewalk within the City. a. Other recourse. Nothing within this section shall impair the ability of the City or a property owner to seek any other recourse against a developer for failing to install sidewalks as required by this section. (Ord. No. 16023 § 1,4-6-2020) Sec. 32-36. - Required sidewalk plan. There is hereby adopted a required sidewalk plan, which shall serve as the sidewalk master plan referred to in this article, said plan being attached to this chapter as appendix 32-A. (Ord. No. 16023. § 1, 4-6-2020) Secs. 32-37-32-49. - Reserved. DIVISION 3. - SIDEWALK REPAIR PROGRAM Sec. 32-50. - Purpose. The purpose of this section is to utilize available funding to maintain and repair a valuable part of the City's transportation infrastructure, namely its sidewalks, without cost to the adjacent property owners. This is meant to supplement and assist in maintenance and repair and not to replace any other obligation found within this chapter. (Ord. No. 16023. § 1,4-6-2020) Sec. 32-51. - Sidewalk repair program funding. Each year the City Council may approve funds for the repair of existing sidewalks. Additionally, each year the City Council shall identify what funds if any shall be used from sales tax proceeds to be used for sidewalk repairs. (Ord. No. 16023 § 1, 4-6-2020) Sec. 32-52. - Staff to identify sidewalks to be repaired. Upon funding being identified, the City staff shall identify areas of sidewalks to be repaired utilizing the funding identified by the City Council. City staff shall identify these sidewalks based upon the condition of the sidewalk and use of said sidewalks. These sidewalks identified shall be submitted to the City Council for about:blank 819 9/12/23, 3:10 PM Jefferson City, MO Code of Ordinances approval or amendment. (Ord. No. 16023 , § 1, 4-6-2020) Sec. 32-53. - Approval by City Council. The City Council shall by resolution, approve or amend the list of sidewalks submitted to the City Council. (Ord. No. 16023. § 1, 4-6-2020) Sec. 32-54. - Action by City staff. Upon approval by the City Council, the City staff shall implement repairs in a timely fashion. (Ord. No. 16023 , § 1,4-6-2020) Sec. 32-55. - No share required from property owner. The adjacent property owner shall not be required to contribute to the cost of any repair funded from the sidewalk repair program. (Ord. No. 16023 § 1, 4-6-2020) Sec. 32-56. - Obligation to repair not negated. Nothing in this division shall relieve the property owner from their obligation to maintain good and sufficient sidewalk and curb. (Ord. No. 16023 , § 1,4-6-2020) Secs. 32-57-32-59. - Reserved. about:blank 9/9 Department of Public Works Memorandum 320 E. McCarty Street • Jefferson City, Missouri 65101 • P 573-634-6410 • F 573-634-6562 • www.ieffcitymo.orq Date: September 5, 2023 To: Public Works and Planning Committee From: Eric Seaman, P.E. Wastewater Division Director Subject: Proposed Section 29 revisions regarding public sewer maintenance The City of Jefferson operates and maintains over 460 miles of sanitary sewer mains. In addition to preventive maintenance, the Wastewater Division provides free 24 hour/7 day availability for sewer main backups. While operation, maintenance and cleaning of the sewer mains is solely the City of Jefferson's responsibility, commercial drain cleaners have been charging residents to attempt to clear clogged drains that are in the City sewer main. This has resulted in: - Residents being fraudulently billed for maintenance that was not their responsibility. - Failure to unclog drains that leads to property damage. - Prolonged and followup backups that compound private property damage. Abandoned private equipment in sewer mains that can cause further backups and injure City Staff. The Code does not explicitly prevent their negligent actions so attached is a draft ordinance that clarifies this work without permission will shift liability for public and private property damage to the drain cleaners along with other applicable administrative penalties. Attachment: Draft Bill Public Works CORE - improve the Community - take Ownership — deliver Results — Empathize with the customer BILL NO. SPONSORED BY COUNCILMEMBER SPENCER ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 29 (SEWERS AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL) OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, BY CHANGING DEFINITIONS, ADJUSTING SPECIFIC POLLUTANT LIMITATIONS BE IT ENACTED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 29 (Sewers and Sewage Disposal) Sec. 29-1 (Definitions and Abbreviations) is amended as follows: Public Sewer — any sewer district pipeline or sewer infrastructure maintained by the City of Jefferson. Section 2 29-63 is added as follows: Sec. 29-63. Maintenance of public sewers The repair, maintenance, cleaning of public sewers is the sole responsibility of the City of Jefferson. Private parties are not allowed to repair, maintain or clean public sewers without permission granted from the Public Works Director. Private parties connecting to, cleaning or otherwise maintaining sewers without permission will be liable for damage to public and private property and subject to administrative fines. Section 3.. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after the date of its passage and approval. Passed: Approved: Presiding Officer Mayor Ron Fitzwater ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Clerk City Counselor Editor's note: Deleted language shown thus. Added language shown thus. Department of Public Works Memorandum 320 E. McCarty Street • Jefferson City, Missouri 65101 • P 573-634-6410 • F 573-634-6562 • www.jeffcitymo.org Date: September 12, 2023 To: Public Work and Planning Committee From: Britt E. Smith, P.E. Subject: Tandem Dump Trucks/Snow Plow Maintenance Concern A recent inspection required two of the six tandem dump trucks in the street fleet to be taken out of service, staff recommends we make minimal repairs to the trucks to keep them in service and find funding to replace them in either the current or next budget year. Below is a list of our current fleet of 6 tandems trucks. Four of these trucks are set up to accept plow and spreaders for snow operation and 2 we use for construction/hauling operations during the winter. During non -winter months all 6 are used for construction and general hauling (such as in support of street sweeping). A recent inspection of two of the trucks found cracked frames. The damage is such that both trucks have been taken out of service. Staff have investigated several options for repair with the first option being to weld/patch areas on of the frames which are cracked. This option is feasible however, it is not expected that the repairs will add much time to the life of the truck. Other options were explored but none were deemed feasible or advisable. As these trucks were already included as a department budget request for replacement, we knew that the estimated cost for replacement is $420,000 for both trucks. If ordered now, we have been told to expect an 18 to 24 months lead time for delivery. Another option explored was to not replace the vehicles at this time and leave them out of service. This option would require that we either: • reduce the number of our snow plow routes (only have 2 tandems working as snow plows); • limit the activities during winter months that require tandem truck hauling (converting 2 non -plow trucks to plows); or • combination of the two (convert one truck to a snow plow). As reducing the number of trucks in operation would require reduced services to the citizens, we believe it should only be done as a last resort. It is staff recommendation that we pursue funding to replace the trucks this year and to also weld patches on the existing truck frames to maintain serviceability until the new trucks arrive. Plate Year Hours Use Issue PW 204 2006 5695 Construction/Snow Plow Currently out of service - Rusted and cracked frame PW 205 2019 2147 Construction/Snow Plow PW 209 2006 6378 Construction/Snow Plow Currently out of service Rusted and cracked frame PW 210 2004 6460 Construction/Sweeping/Paving Could possibility turn into a snow plow PW 213 2019 2084 Construction/Snow Plow PW 217 2005 6279 Construction/Sweeping/Paving Could possibility turn into a snow plow cc: Matt Morasch, P.E. Attachment NEVUS RELEASE JEF W`TRAN Department of Public Works • 320 East McCarty Street • Jefferson City, MO 65101 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE NOTICE TO PUBLIC JEFFTRAN Announcement — All Routes Return to Regular Service in October Jefferson City, Missouri —September 14, 2023 All JEFFTRAN routes will return to regular operation on October 2", 2023. Due to a driver shortage, which started in February of 2023, JEFFTRAN service was adjusted to an alternating route system. The City of Jefferson and JEFFTRAN staff would like to thank the public for their patience during this period. Bus locations and timing are available via the Double Map on a mobile device or by going to the website at http://jefftran.doublemap.com/map/. For more information about the routes and timetables, including printable guides, please go to the JEFFTRAN website at www.jefftran.orq. Questions can be directed to the Transit Division at 573-634-6477. Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. Memorandum 320 East McCarty Street • Jefferson City, Missouri 65101 • P: 573.634.6410 • F: 573.634.6562 • www_jeffersoncitymo.gov Date: September 11, 2023 To: Public Works and Planning Committee From: David Bange P.E., City Engineer Subject: High Street Viaduct Options Staff is presenting the Committee with a number of options for the High Street Viaduct to received comments and to seek approval to present these options at additional public meetings. The High Street Viaduct was among the projects named in the literature as a cooperative City/County project at the time the current CIP sales tax was presented to the voters in the fall of 2021. On July 12, 2022 a hole developed in the deck of the bridge. The bridge was closed temporarily until it was determined that the hole could be, and was, covered by a steel plate. The situation was declared an emergency, and a design contract was entered with Bartlett & West to evaluate the structure and to design a repair for the hole. The hole was repaired in late November 2022. During the Public Works and Planning Committee in August of 2022 staff was directed to pursue the design for the replacement of the High Street Viaduct, and in January of 2023 the Council approved a contract with Bartlett and West for the conceptual/preliminary design. In March of 2023 during a discussion of Sales Tax H Joint City/County projects at Public Works and Planning meeting the Committee indicated their preference to reduce the funding that had been allotted to the Viaduct from $5,000,000 to $200,000. With this redirection in funding the focus on the project waned but Bartlett and West continued to work on preliminary concepts for the bridge and in mid- summer met with staff to discuss a number of sketches. At that meeting five of the concepts were chosen for further development. These five concepts are attached and will be discussed at the meeting. If you have any questions or concerns I can be reached at 634-6433. U:\PublicWorksEngineering\dbange\PUBLIC WORKS & PLANNING1202319-202311igh Street Viaduct options.docx 1•••+v.F6•1+m a ,m n...q ,1-•uM•+a,F.••,•••••• ,._.tnwaa,x1,/UK •I sy y,..+-•• 1111/[1.14, Rawl h InV ., WC. •4,aw l.. l.. I i=8 100403 101100 MISSOURI B 103+00 !E 11 I J • �r. 5 7§ r r ttg tg 1 1lIT§ 1 107400 10340 107+00 50 h=1-1 r 1 I I, I r -- _ JSOViURI-DLVD- — s — 1 ki 7 • • • yOT Rc G~9 /04 OPTION 1 REPLACE EXISTING BRIDGE HIGH STREET VIADUCT JEFFERSON CITY, MISSOURI s 0 0 'sat x a,, - s 4 t k 4 9 A„ R & ?E z Eli 6W0 7+00 8+ 00 9W0 HIGH STREET - OPTION I STA. 2+ 50.00 TO STA. 15+25. 00 Bartlett &West Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Date: B&W Project No.: May 8, 2023 16197.213 High Street Viaduct - Option 1 - Replace Existing Bridge Jefferson City, Missouri City Project No.: N/A Item No. Description Quantity Unit Engineer's Estimate Unit Price Total Cost 1 Mobilization 1 LS 550,000.00 $550,000.00 2 Contractor Construction Staking 1 LS 20,000.00 $20,000.00 3 Removal of Improvements 1 LS 30,000.00 $30,000.00 4 Removal of Bridges 1 LS 515,000.00 $515,000.00 5 Earthwork 1 LS 50,000.00 $50,000.00 6 Type 5 Aggregate Base 8,700 SY 8.00 $69,600.00 7 10" Asphalt Pavement 5,646 SY 40.00 $225,840.00 8 8" PCC Commercial Concrete Drive 133 SY 75.00 $9,975.00 9 Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 1,631 SY 50.00 581,550.00 10 Curb and Gutter 3,317 LF 50.00 $165,867.50 11 Handrail 820 LF 100.00 582,000.00 12 Retaining Wall 13,965 SF 100.00 $1,396,500.00 13 3 Cell - 16' x 16' Box Culvert - Missouri Blvd 120 LF 10,500.00 $1,260,000.00 14 Bridge Deck Area - High Street 25,941 SF 250.00 $6,485,250.00 15 Temporary Traffic Control 1 LS 15,000.00 $15,000.00 16 Storm Sewer 1 LS 100,000.00 $100,000.00 17 Erosion Control 1 LS 10,000.00 $10,000.00 18 Pavement Marking & Signing 1 LS 10,000.00 $10,000.00 19 Decorative Lighting 1 LS 70,000.00 $70,000.00 Subtotal $11,146,582.50 Contingency 10% $1,114,658.25 Total Construction Cost (2023 Dollars) $12,261,240.75 At the time this estimate was prepared, utility relocation and right of way acquisition needs are unknown and nave been omitted from the pro ect cost estimate. Thts protect cos opinion was prepared using bid tabulation information available al the time of preparation and is prepared in good faith using engineer's judgment and experience. There is no inflation included for future years as the construction timeframe is unknown. The engineer makes no guarantee as to the actual costs for construction. cipmiataltopoka011msa01755ebanwest.com\d0109024116197213 - Combined Estimate Page 1 of 5 1 1 2+ 1- -1- - �— HIGH STREET McCARTY STREET nu rAcc SiA �. SO tl uA x 03[ POI 0 .4 a4c1AL 233015+4 0 v 3m w131r 363.6.3,-.34 m366r r. I 200+00 201+00 202+0 0 243400 204100 205+00 206100 207100 208+ 00 209+00 210+00 211+00 212+00 F -F - I-4-1 4- - 1- -1--I- I- I -i-4 4---F- I- -1--4- -1 1 1- 4 - I i-1- 4 tf- - I ---1-I - 4-♦- 4 -1--1- I -1-1 +---4 - I- -4-4 - -1 -1-4 1-1-1 1 MAIN STREET 21J, 51391'2. 5. #410,FT BRIDGE 9 rwu.w _ $1 1RAIMW CMM L(4 T 16 +00 - -1- I -I HIGH STREET -I 12 1 • 9. 1011 .nwA69r O 102 03 1514730_ 154' x¢2 3 3 Y 10 1 1 1 1 mommaiiimoin — -- — —I IN N-- --w---MI INEImM ME IIM =NM U MO M --� ee�rr CC --1. mIZ_rsia--- —� --___ Casimir— —rte—ww INIIMININIIIPWIROMM INENIM _ -- aeatts�-- -. --_ www—wION ---w1•111—IMIlmi--i [o . 41101111 6 ♦—SO iUMIIMIIIIMII—I ww�.ww.wOM wwMI1Iw_IIMINIMMIEMINl !♦ swwl—�--I -W-WIi.IN--w(♦1 - - I — -- —�—� imiNilLiaMloolass.w.INPI MI 1= _---ww C C w� -■ MM -- MEM 9+00 5+00 6+W 7+ 00 6+00 9+00 10+ 00 11+00 HIGH STREET - O PIMON 2 STA . 2+ 25.00 TO STA. 19+75.00 eu n Oat 040 4 o. OFF ICIAL n.vlv rl 0 750 N MEM �—------- —----- --—----- --------- —----- - ------w---------.iii -------------ii----------© ----------------------------wwww-------- —..... -------------------------------�— ® --wwww---wwww------ I--. Pi.pl—wwww--wwww--- - -wwww--wwww-------il siw-r re!Ik.'! ------w—wwwwwsiVi.-- -------------------.—�.'�i7--wwww-- ---wwww-- - ----�iu ti.pat 1:::a—mmio4 F -.. n..'. �----. .-7sw—.'7[--- outauz at www— s-- - -----_ �--- umem C1� �C__� --CIM— �C C_� wwww-- -- ••—--�IRr= -- -- � ��.aidfii 9�a Ira---•�—--��e�.iiiiiiiiiiii .....`w.--—_ —lily --- a-- ---• •— s—�I—----f;IF7-- -- IIIMI_1_ t -- ---..— s --MW --------•1Fi-- s-- €_wwww— �__ __—_—. — m--mu--------wrr =-- �_��� :.-I..C—---IeLiCwlw---_--milmor u mow—_ - w— _ 3____ F,ae ma>�s.naiamm em a ,...,.-rT-_ a— =-- © -------w-------rte--- �•inuimi '—w�I�l��--�-----.�i—wsE ii MI— � �EM�� ��MINZ-• 'x1�T—u... 7' �y uC�MEM�—wwww---EIFI---EIEi s-- __—� _CC_ ___� ___=...r ----wwww_: �::C� IBC =C • - ------------------••WE ....... M=ImliMIIMIIIIIM=IlimMII MINIIIM =MINIMS --- N -------------wwww-- GM� - NMI IIIIM---------------------------------o .1111111 ..................................__ 441 4 ... . ,. 4 fl 99+50 100+00 101+00 102+ MISSOURI BLVD - OPTION 2 STA. 100 +00 .00 TO STA. 108+75.00 I. 7 .7 a,,.a,l. S CA Lf .®.,. . 4 CO W J z WE 4 00 oN NO M m z E CL ;2 0 cri w w0 H i_z az a. u__1 my 0D xa 1r W iLL - 110 z W U ..0 m.ro. 1411,211 4 4 el 10 Bartlett &West Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Date: B&W Project No.: May 8, 2023 16197.213 High Street Viaduct - Option 2 - 410 FT. Bridge Jefferson City, Missouri City Project No.: N/A Item No. Description Quantity Unit Engineer's Estimate Unit Price Total Cost 1 Mobilization 1 LS 500,000.00 $500,000.00 2 Contractor Construction Staking 1 LS 25,000.00 $25,000.00 3 Removal of Improvements 1 LS 50,000.00 $50,000.00 4 Removal of Bridges 1 LS 515,000.00 $515,000.00 5 Earthwork 1 LS 100,000.00 $100,000.00 6 Type 5 Aggregate Base 12,449 SY 8.00 $99,592.00 7 10" Asphalt Pavement 6,571 SY 40.00 $262,840.00 8 8" PCC Commercial Concrete Drive 908 SY 75.00 $68,100.00 9 9" Concrete Roundabout Apron 414 SY 100.00 $41,400.00 10 6" Concrete Median Island 311 SY 80.00 $24,880.00 11 8" Concrete Pavement (Parking) 438 SY 75.00 $32,850.00 12 Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 1,841 SY 50.00 $92,050.00 13 Curb and Gutter 5,055 LF 50.00 $252,747.00 14 Handrail 851 LF 100.00 $85,100.00 15 Retaining Wall 16,080 SF 100.00 $1,608,000.00 16 3 CeII - 16' x 16' Box Culvert - Missouri Blvd 160 LF 10,500.00 $1,680,000.00 17 8' x 12' Box Culvert - Missouri Blvd Pedestrian Tunnel 135 LF 1,850.00 $249,750.00 18 Bridge Deck Area - High Street 18,322 SF 250.00 $4,580,500.00 19 Temporary Traffic Control 1 LS 20,000.00 $20,000.00 20 Storm Sewer 1 LS 150,000.00 $0.00 21 Erosion Control 1 LS 15,000.00 $15,000.00 22 Pavement Marking & Signing 1 LS 20,000.00 $20,000.00 23 Decorative Lighting 1 LS 100,000.00 $100,000.00 Subtotal $10,322,809.00 Contingency 10% $1,032,280.90 Total Construction Cost (2023 Dollars) $11,355,089.90 At the time this estimate was prepared, utility relocation and right of way acquisition needs are unknown and nave been omitted from the pro ect cost estimate. This protect cost opinion was prepared using bid tabulation information available at the time of preparation and is prepared in good faith using engineers judgment and experience. There is no inflation included for future years as the construction timeframe is unknown. The engineer makes no guarantee as to the actual costs for construction. c:\padata\topeka011msa01755ebartwest.comk10109024\16197213 - Combined Estmeto Pogo 2 of 2. HIGH STREET illl n5. 40 CAC IS ONE UxcH Gx fsfiCW DU.wixc s 0 200+ 00 201+00 202.00 200. 00 204+00 200.00 206,00 202.00 208+00 2011+00 210.00 211+00 212,00 �f - Yrt 1- —/—F I —1-1 4—I— 1- ti --F- -1 I-1-1 i-1— 4 -4—i- 1---F--1 4-1— 1- -f-4- -1 —4—f - -1—j $tll MAIN STREET 1,1107 Oh f Not ADJU ST f G4f A[m ADlx0ty . FlLLfAE STAMp.t0 �RA:xMG WALL IT ”) M .Y. RDISTI1W CDC McC ARTY STREET Ob,230 FT BRIDgE WITH REA NED CREEK —1+ - —f— I 161 --1— - -1— -1 — HIGH STREE T W Wy U W Z 0 J MIQ LI 0 CC ai= lL1 E2 U. LL a c ij N N Q3 J H W U �Z N� S fY �LL xW W cID N!f ▪ 111197111 ▪ MA T 3023 5 1 J 10 two 0101101001.00...04,0 M21,M,.es..0... 0.1 1. 0001114 01441 110041 10.10104 11.414.1.4000,44,11,1• 8 8 8 8 A I2 - I2=14 14.5540 Iwa3a � 8 8 0 a "s j s56.7ij a. IS fs 8' 8 8 0 --•-F t. .p; 8 I2:re fG-S41ri G. 12:111' 4.01.1.11 .5510 ss+.n iUx 87x.0 gg lOs MIS i o•`. 7 4.55111 8 1`110 �:SSSS�;n I23 fC•iti415 $ t.A SA I0 4A' 1Y• ,100 a• m 15445 8 8 8 8 8 8 1 a 1 8 E 0 4,0). RO c 0.10 100.0400 OPTION 3 230 FT BRIDGE WITH REALIGNED CREEK CENTERLINE PROFILES HIGH STREET VIADUCT JEFFERSON CITY. MISSOURI "1000N11110 01, 00011.01.1000 g 9 Q 1 8 4 OS a BartIettWest Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Date: B&W Project No.: May 8, 2023 16197.213 High Street Viaduct - Option 3 - 230 FT. Bridge Jefferson City, Missouri City Project No.: N/A Item No. Description Quantity Engineer's Estimate Unit Unit Price Total Cost 1 Mobilization 1 LS 450,000.00 $450,000.00 2 Contractor Construction Staking 1 LS 25,000.00 $25,000.00 3 Removal of Improvements 1 LS 50,000.00 $50,000.00 4 Removal of Bridges 1 LS 515,000.00 $515,000.00 5 Earthwork 1 LS 200,000.00 $200,000.00 6 Type 5 Aggregate Base 13,790 SY 8.00 $110,320.00 7 10" Asphalt Pavement 7,040 SY 40.00 $281,600.00 8 8" PCC Commercial Concrete Drive 908 SY 75.00 $68,100.00 9 9" Concrete Roundabout Apron 414 SY 100.00 $41,400.00 10 6" Concrete Median Island 311 SY 80.00 $24,880.00 11 8" Concrete Pavement (Parking) 805 SY 75.00 $60,375.00 12 Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 2,081 SY 50.00 $104,050.00 13 Curb and Gutter 5,737 LF 50.00 $286,858.50 14 Handrail 864 LF 100.00 $86,400.00 15 Retaining Wall 29,084 SF 100.00 $2,908,400.00 16 3 Cell - 16' x 16' Box Culvert - Missouri Blvd 160 LF 10,500.00 $1,680,000.00 17 8' x 12' Box Culvert - Missouri Blvd Pedestrian Tunnel 135 LF 1,850.00 $249,750.00 18 Bridge Deck Area - High Street 10,212 SF 250.00 $2,553,000.00 19 Temporary Traffic Control 1 LS 20,000.00 $20,000.00 20 Storm Sewer 1 LS 150,000.00 $0.00 21 Erosion Control 1 LS 15,000.00 $15,000.00 22 Pavement Marking & Signing 1 LS 20,000.00 $20,000.00 23 Decorative Lighting 1 LS 100,000.00 $100,000.00 24 Channel Realignment 1 LS 350,000.00 $350,000.00 Subtotal $9,850,133.50 Contingency 10% $985,013.35 Total Construction Cost (2023 Dollars) $10,835,146.85 • ct t f ate This ro ect cost opinion At the time this estimate was prepared, utility relocation and right of way acquisition needs are unknown and have beer omitted from the pro a cos es 1m p was prepared using bid tabulation information available at the time of preparation and is prepared in good faith using engineer's judgment and experience. There is no inflation included for future years as the construction timeframe is unknown. The engineer makes no guarantee as to the actual costs for construction. capwdatadopeka07lrtssa01755@tranwest.comld0109024116197213 -Combined Estimate Page 3 o15 r 1 ,CI r o ok r NTT 11 1 F A r L Nor Nc oy SrR GCT SON OPTION 4 80 FT BRIDGE WITH BOX CULVERT HIGH STREET VIADUCT JEFFERSON CITY. MISSOURI Bartlett&West •Ttart.•urre to t. WR Y.Pars .K' dint erN. Fr.rutf.otnH1wwr Wnr)tt PDona9 111•••• CO," • 11.rscnrM wcinvtis.. Ncmi• 4/ t•,0 8 8 g 8 8 8 11111111 1111111111 1111111111111111111111111 4.1111111111111111111111/111111111111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII hii�illlllllll lull 1111111111111111!'!1.1111111111111 j■111111111111111lIIIlim 1111111111111 11111111111111111 111111111!1111111111 X111111111111111! 111111 8-11111111111 11111111111111111111111 1111111111 11111111111I111t 11011111i111lllllll 4411111111111111111M 1111111111111111 II11111111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIII 11Illllllllllll 411111111111111111111111171111111111 IlIl11111I1a11 11 1I IIIIII IIIII1111H31a11 1111111111 I1Ill1Illllll.IltI!11111P1111111nlllll • 11111111111111itIIhi111111111111111 • 111111111111111 tI 1111111111111111111 111111W111111 _111111111111111111 • Illllllll'1I111� i11111IHI1IhIII111 • 1IIIIIn IP miniluI��I110111111 III■iinuIII� loti'11111uiiuiu111� 1 IIII 111 rlG: �iu.uuiini !11111 IIIhII1111Ii11!i IIIlIIIIIQI4111IIIl iro IIIIIllhI11IL 1l1IIIIIIk HIl1III _111111111111111 . 111111111111111 : 11111111111111 I111IIIIl11111 NOON 11111111111111. I EEM.11i1111111 211111111111111 1111111111111111111 111111 1111011111 41 ,,, 11111111111111111111 X41111111111111111':I11111I11111111111111 i4111111111111111�' 11111113 1111111111 �11111111i1ea II II11I1111111111111 4411111111111111111111111111111111111111 '4411111111111111111111111711111111111 I1III11IIIIII 41111111111111111111 W 111111111111111 III11111111!Ii.117"1' 1111111111111 ■ I11111111111ll hllii 1111111111111 IIII!IIIII1111II11111I1111111IIIIII IMIlinuiniiuuiiuuu.inuu1L111111 `711111111111111111111111111111111111 _ 11111111111111111111111111111111111 M ,17 timumuffidiFifilipm .--,11111111111111111 mom 1111„mill mommollii ' Nom 111111111101 11111 i i fu ~or R� Sr? GCT OH OPTION 4 80 FT BRIDGE WITH BOX CULVERT CENTERLINE PROFILES HIGH STREET VIADUCT JEFFERSON CITY, MISSOURI Bartlett & e t .1 IVOR IAC 101 DZIITIDICAIS Le DUTIOIDDIT• 41==.1= Bartlett "'_West Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Date: B&W Project No.: May 8, 2023 16197.213 High Street Viaduct - Option 4 - Box Culvert Jefferson City, Missouri City Project No.: N/A Item No. Description Quantity Unit Engineer's Estimate Unit Price Total Cost 1 Mobilization 1 LS 520,000.00 $520,000.00 2 Contractor Construction Staking 1 LS 25,000.00 $25,000.00 3 Removal of Improvements 1 LS 50,000.00 $50,000.00 4 Removal of Bridges 1 LS 515,000.00 $515,000.00 5 Earthwork 1 LS 340,000.00 $340,000.00 6 Type 5 Aggregate Base 14,047 SY 8.00 $112,376.00 7 10" Asphalt Pavement 7,464 SY 40.00 $298,560.00 8 8" PCC Commercial Concrete Drive 908 SY 75.00 $68,100.00 9 9" Concrete Roundabout Apron 414 SY 100.00 $41,400.00 10 6" Concrete Median Island 311 SY 80.00 $24,880.00 11 8" Concrete Pavement (Parking) 438 SY 75.00 $32,850.00 12 Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 2,279 SY 50.00 $113,950.00 13 Curb and Gutter 5,742 LF 50.00 $287,100.00 14 Handrail 487 LF 100.00 $48,700.00 15 Retaining Wall 22,992 SF 100.00 $2,299,200.00 16 3 Cell - 16' x 16' Box Culvert - Missouri Blvd 540 LF 10,500.00 $5,670,000.00 17 8' x 12' Box Culvert- Missouri Blvd Pedestrian Tunnel 135 LF 1,850.00 $249,750.00 18 Bridge Deck Area - High Street 3,679 SF 250.00 $919,750.00 19 Temporary Traffic Control 1 LS 20,000.00 $20,000.00 20 Storm Sewer 1 LS 175,000.00 $0.00 21 Erosion Control 1 LS 15,000.00 $15,000.00 22 Pavement Marking & Signing 1 LS 20,000.00 $20,000.00 23 Decorative Lighting 1 LS 100,000.00 $100,000.00 Subtotal $11,771,616.00 Contingency 10% $1,177,161.60 Total Construction Cost (2023 Dollars) $12,948,777.60 At the time this estimate was prepared, utility relocation and right of way acquisition needs are unknown and have been omitted from the pro ect cost estimate. This protect cost opinion was prepared using bid tabulation information available at the time of preparation and is prepared in good faith using engineer's judgment and experience. There is no inflation included for future years as the construction timeframe is unknown. The engineer makes no guarantee as to the actual costs for construction. capwdatattopeka01 Vnsa01755@baavmst.coo$d0109024116197.219 - Combined Estimate Page 4 o15 • 44, 44441 3 3 SO 10 0 9 l I ^j -\\ , ' i 100.00 101+00 1 1 1 1 1, 1_I_ MISSOURI BLVD E xl. 06400 10700 4- y —,--I—, ... JAI kvID 1—:--00 I 101400 1090 0 —F OPTION 5 REMOVE EXISTING BRIDGE BarWLt&.est L OH `,1•9 0, HIGH STREET VIADUCT OH JEFFERSON CITY. MISSOURI el 141141CATII •1104044114401=4=4:741•44414 B s Uiinii IIIHIIIIUIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII NIMIIIIIII111111111II1111111 I11111IIIIIIlllllllllllll 111■111111111 111n11111111 Id IIIII111111IIIInln11111 111111111111111111111111111111 liM1111111111111111111111111 1 ■I111111111111111111n11 I 111111111 11111111111'1 s:. uIullnnl ' ,Illlll! ►11111111111 ii"..i: u 11 mammon humming iii . i11111111111111n111A �W�T 1 1110. ER111111111151 1 I111111n111I11111111111ii 1111111111111111111111011111 /14111111111111111.1111111111 11111111111111111111111111 IIIIII 11111 1 ° X1111 11111111�11I11 1 1111 II I II mll191Blll l l ll ll 1. 1111111111111IIIiil11111111 IIIII! '11111 A111111 itiM1111111iiiiIINI1101111 :4141111111111111111111111111111 #III111n1 . rl1111II 1 11111111111111 illllliii11111 IIIII111I111IIIInrni11 :#41111111111111111111111011 1141111111111H1111111111111 llllllllll .>�.�.iiIIIIII :1. ►11IIIIIIIIIIInlIIIIIIIIII :i1 1111: =11111 1111111 1 it IIIIH1111 IIIIIIIIIIIIII 1 11111111111 11111111111111 ../M1111111111 I1nI11111111 11 1111111111!11111111111111 1111.4111111111111111111011111111 INIII11111111111:111M1111111 S114111111111111113111111111111 '1041111111111111111111111111111 I IiIn1111ig1111 11111111 1411111111111iii11!111111111 1101111111111111111 A1111111111 I111IIlI 11IIIIIIIIIIII11inIII11111 1 111111111111111111:11111111 44111111111111111111111111111 11'111111I1I11111I Ip1111,1I II I I I 41111111111111111111111111111 M 1111111111111111111111111 1ii�1111111 111111111111111 1u11111IIIIICIIIIIIIIIIIIII 11111111111111 6 e 8 L RO1 R� °Rs OR 1111111111 11111 1111111111 n 11111111 01M11111111111111111111 x1.1111111111111111111111 1 1111 I11II11IIIIII 1 111111111111111111 111 n11n1111111 8011111111111111111111111 IrlIII111NII,ii11111111 IIIIIIIII IIfhln11 1 i11111111111hi11111l111 ili1111111111111111111Mill 1 ►111111IIIn11111i11i1 1l1►11111111111111111111 I IIIIIIIIIIiIllllllll 011411111111131111111111111 iallmiquommin �Il liiiu.�illl1111II 1 I11HII II11111111111111 X11 Illliillf l llllll 1 411111111i�1'ELAIllEU llul liu 112111111111 aijll 1 11PI1111111111 .: II 1 III1I1I1111i111111ii I *M1111111111111111111 -11 A111111I1hulfi1111111 :446111111111111111111111 1III 111111 1111111 141/11111nll 1111 ii1nI111111111-11 .11411I18111111111111111 1 11 1111111 111111111 IllIII I II IIIIIIlls llllnlllIDillllllllll =14111111111111111111111 11111111 �!IIIIIIIIIIIII 11 i1111111i 11111111111111 ..1 111IIII 111".11111111111 :4111111111111111111M/11 nlll IlnIIIllllllllllln -4111111111111111111111111 SEIM OPTION 5 REMOVE EXISTING BRIDGE CENTERLINE PROFILES HIGH STREET VIADUCT JEFFERSON CITY, MISSOURI Uiii� ifill11111111=1111111 111111111111111111.1111111 11IIi11111111uiuul11 IIMIIIM111111111111111 111111111111111111111111 IIIIiii. iuuiiuui' all1111111111111111111 1ii1III Illlll I111II I11II tIM11111111111111111 iiin111111M1111111111 i`iiiI1111I1I11IIIlllllll 1 1111111111111111111111 111111 i 1111111111111 111111 111,1111111111111111 411•111111111111111111111 Mil 11111111111111111111 M111111111111111111111 411111111111111111111111 Iiii11111I11I111111 nll NIE01111111111111111111 4411111111P1411111111111 ii0111111111111111111111111 1111M1011111111 .4411111111111011i1111111111 II1111!1111111IIIIIII Will11111111111111M11 4111111111111M111111111 • �Itn:I�a���u��El�u 1111111:11111111 :11.10111111111111111111111 =!'41111111111111 11111 i)111111111 111111 _ _11111 i1011111111111111111111111 1 1ii11II1IIiliU!In1111111 1 1111iii 111111111 14!1 11111111111111111111 1 .1llllll11,11111111111 11111111111111111111111 rill14!11111 IUIIr :Illlll 11iIII 11.1..1111,IIIII i .1111111i1h11111111111 1 1!1111111€1111111111111 M9111111111111111111 iiii1111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111 1111111111 InT111.10101:11,,11110 ON. .1111111141111111111 OP *VIM. 0.114111 • 11311.1•11.11.411 immo rm Mal 8 Bartlett ',West Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Date: B&W Project No.: May 8, 2023 16197.213 High Street Viaduct - Option 5 - Remove Bridge Jefferson City, Missouri City Project No.: N/A Item No. Description Quantity Unit Engineer's Estimate Unit Price Total Cost 1 Mobilization 1 LS 315,000.00 $315,000.00 2 Contractor Construction Staking 1 LS 25,000.00 $25,000.00 3 Removal of Improvements 1 LS 75,000.00 $75,000.00 4 Removal of Bridges 1 LS 600,000.00 $600,000.00 5 Earthwork 1 LS 10,000.00 $10,000.00 6 Type 5 Aggregate Base 19,186 SY 8.00 $153,488.00 7 10" Asphalt Pavement 12,117 SY 40.00 $484,680.00 8 8" PCC Commercial Concrete Drive 894 SY 75.00 $67,050.00 9 9" Concrete Roundabout Apron 379 SY 100.00 $37,900.00 10 6" Concrete Median Island 245 SY 80.00 $19,600.00 11 8" Concrete Pavement (Parking) 456 SY 75.00 $34,200.00 12 Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 2,792 SY 50.00 $139,600.00 13 Curb and Gutter 5,923 LF 35.00 $207,305.00 14 Handrail 750 LF 100.00 $75,000.00 15 Retaining Wall 8,952 SF 100.00 $895,247.43 16 3 Cell - 16' x 16' Box Culvert - Missouri Blvd 130 LF 10,500.00 $1,365,000.00 17 Bridge Deck Area - Main Street 7,904 SF 250.00 $1,976,000.00 18 Temporary Traffic Control 1 LS 25,000.00 $25,000.00 19 Storm Sewer 1 LS 200,000.00 $0.00 20 Erosion Control 1 LS 15,000.00 $15,000.00 21 Pavement Marking & Signing 1 LS 25,000.00 $25,000.00 22 Decorative Lighting 1 LS 100,000.00 $100,000.00 Subtotal $6,645,070.43 Contingency 10% $664,507.04 Total Construction Cost (2023 Dollars) $7,309,577.47 At the time this estimate was prepared, utility relocation and right of way acquisition needs are unknown and have been omitted from the pro ect cost estimate. This project cost opinion was prepared using bid tabulation information available at the time of preparation and is prepared in good faith using engineer's judgment and experience. There is no inflation included for future years as the construction timeframe is unknown. The engineer makes no guarantee as to the actual costs for construction. cipn dataltopeka0lbnsa01755abartwest.com'd0109024\16197.210 - Combined Estimate Page 5 of 5 Memorandum 320 East McCarty Street • Jefferson City, Missouri 65101 • P: 573.634.6410 • F: 573.634.6562 • www.jeffersoncitymo.qov Date: September 11, 2023 To: Public Works and Planning Committee From: David Bange P.E., City Engineer Subject: Review of Intersection Types Below please find a general discussion of various types of intersections including roundabouts. The intersection types that are seen in small urban areas generally include uncontrolled intersections, side street yield, side street stop, four way stop, traffic signals, and roundabouts. These intersections controls are generally progressive based on traffic volumes with the uncontrolled intersection being used only in low volume residential setting and traffic signals only being used at high volume intersections. The outlier in this grouping is the roundabout which could be used in all of these settings. The goal of every one of these intersection types is to provide for the safe and efficient passage of people through them. In the case of the uncontrolled intersection the volume and speed are low encountering another vehicle at the intersection is an infrequent occurrence. In this case the intersection is safe because of the low volume and efficiency is improved by not requiring any vehicle to stop. The side street yield is similar in that volume is low but due to the geometric arrangement or somewhat different volumes it is desired to give preference to one street over another. As in the prior case efficiency is maintained by not requiring the vehicles to stop. In the case of the side street stop intersection the volume and speed of the main street has increased such that safety becomes a greater concern than efficiency. While stopping decreases efficiency it is necessary to maintain a safe intersection. An all way stop intersection comes into play as the volume of the side street and or main line street increases to the point where there is excessive delay as a result of the number of cars entering the main line or the number of cars on the main line do not allow for sufficient gaps to allow the side street to ender the intersection. All way stops may also be necessary in lower volume situations that have limited sight distance or geometry that make it more difficult to enter the intersection. As volume continue to increase an all way stop begins to break down as the delay caused by requiring each vehicle to move through the intersection individually becomes excessive. At that point a traffic signal may be warranted. This system is able to move more vehicles through the system because a group of vehicles can move through the intersection as a unit at a greater speed and generally multiple movements can be operating at the same time. This system is not perfect in that it does not adapt well to variations in traffic volume and at times requires a vehicle to stop and wait when there is no other U:\PublicWorks\Engineeringkibange\PUBLIC WORKS & PLANNING1202319-20231Intersection Types.docx Memorandum 2 vehicle in the intersection. It also increases the likelihood of traffic crashes, including rear end collisions and right-angle crashes. A traffic signal also comes with continuous maintenance both on the physical equipment and in the effort required to ensure the timing of the signal remains current with changing traffic patterns. As eluded to previously roundabouts exist in a category unto themselves because they can be used efficiently in the place of any of the other intersection types. Because they instantaneously adjust to changes in traffic volume and very often only require a person to yield they are much more efficient and environmentally friendly. Roundabouts are also much safer then traditional traffic signals reducing severe injury and fatal crashes by nearly 80%. This happens through the reduction of conflict points in the intersection and by creating an environment where speeds are lower and crashes, when they do occur, are sideswipes rather then head on or right-angle crashes. Roundabouts can also be used to address issues with awkward geometry such as skewed or offset intersections. While roundabouts generally do take up more area at the intersection itself they, because of their near continuous flow, do not require the storage that a signalized intersection requires and also eliminates the need for left hand turn lanes which in turn can be used for additional through lanes. While the initial cost of construction of a roundabout may be higher than a simple signal the lifetime costs are lower when considering fuel consumption, the cost of delay, maintenance, and property damage and personal injury resulting from crashes. Roundabouts also have the ancillary benefit of providing for beatification and placemaking as well as serving to calm traffic If you have any questions or concerns I can be reached at 634-6433. U:1Public Works\Engineeringldbange\PUBLIC WORKS & PLANNING1202319-202311ntersection Types.docx Memorandum 320 East McCarty Street • Jefferson City, Missouri 65101 • P: 573.634.6410 • F: 573.634.6562 • www.jeffersoncitymo.gov Date: September 11, 2023 To: Public Works and Planning Committee From: David Bange P.E., City Engineer -\:)? Subject: Northwood Drive Sewer Extension At the request of the Committee Chairman staff is presenting a schematic alignment with an estimated cost of $200,000 for a sewer extension to serve the properties on Northwood Drive. As can be seen on the attached drawing (shown in green) sanitary sewer exists on the property owned by Public Water District #2 on the eastern side of Highway 179. There also exists a disconnected section of sewer that was constructed when the highway was built. The distance between these two sections is approximately 390 feet. (shown in blue) This would provide sewer accessibility to a 6.37 acre residually zoned tract and would be available to the house currently situated there. A preliminary estimate of this portion of the project would place the cost in the range of 30 to 40 thousand dollars. A further 950 -foot extension (also shown in blue) running southward along the easterly property line of the parcels facing Northwood Drive would allow for eight properties to connect to the system. The property to the south of Southridge Drive would have access to the sewer but may require a sewage pump. This section of sewer could be constructed at an estimated cost of 160 to 170 thousand dollars. The red lines on the drawing indicate lateral extensions from the individual properties and would be the responsibility, and at the cost, of the property owners. With further extensions of this sewer along the existing ravines it appears that approximately thirteen additional acres made up of nine parcels could be served by the sewer. If you have any questions or concerns I can be reached at 634-6433. U:\Public Works\Engineering\dbange\PUBLIC WORKS & PLANNING1202319-20231Northwood Drive Sewer Extension.docx Dona ld Se xton Juan ita and John Sykes Aehli -- -rte' I Ar Bowman v Kevin Al Klle ge l r W Li Lea h Betty !Amber McHugh, ll3 S ylldel Backee Byrd Jr.. E a . p ..,Y.- . 9a6 Do rothy & lnon Loes ch RZW Grou p LLC Mark Bellinger, Ron dy W right Future Sewer Main N ew Sewer Lateral Stub • New Sewer Main DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES MEMORANDUM TO: Public Works & Planning Committee THROUGH: Clint Smith, Planning & Protective Services Director FROM: Rachel Senzee, Neighborhood Services Supervisor DATE: September 12, 2023 RE: Neighborhood Services' Grants Status Report Due to the increased amount of federal funding, Neighborhood Services will maintain a standing agenda item to update Council and the Public. The status report will include current projects and subgrant information, pending application statuses, and upcoming funding opportunities. Informational links will also be provided, when available. The intent of the grant status report is to: 1. Update the Public about funding opportunities 2. Give Council the information necessary to provide their respective constituency 3. Provide information to support budgetary decisions Committee Request: None — information only. For questions or comments, please contact Rachel Senzee at rsenzee(cr�jeffersoncitymo.gov or 573-634-6305. Neighborhood Services Grants Update Public Works & Planning — August 10, 2023 Current Project Status: Economic Development Administration (EDA)-DR MSP Infrastructure $3,099,595 Total Project Cost • Due to conflicting timelines and a shift in project scope, the City will "terminate for convenience." Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) — Entitlement Funds — PY2023 $290,506 Current Timeline: ® Spend funds by December 31, 2023 • Projects include: o Down Payment Assistance (met goal) o Emergency Home Repair o Voluntary Demolitions • 1320 E Miller— Habitat for Humanity • Old Animal Shelter ('57,000) o Public Infrastructure • Parking bump out on Dunklin in front of the Community Center ($40,000) • Analysis of Impediments of Fair Housing Choice plan is required to be updated every five years. o Working with consultants — RI<G ® 2023 Annual Action Plan — submitted to HUD e Consolidated Plan (2024-2029) CDBG-CARES (CV) — Childcare Facility Grants - $413,435 Current Timeline: • Funds need to be spent by December 31, 2023 o $330,748 has been subgranted to 11 childcare facilities for: childcare subsidies, overhead costs, or small construction projects to prepare, prevent, or respond to COVID-19 ® Early Explores — 211 Oscar Drive o Building expansion project o Waiting for Authority to Use Grant funds (AUGF)/notice to proceed from HUD • FYI o COVID Stats: Out of 32 licensed daycare facilities in Jefferson City, 23 temporarily or permanently closed during the pandemic. o Grants for Childcare Facilities ■ DESE Office of Childhood Grants CDBG-Disaster Recovery (DR) — Housing Recovery Activities $7,309,300 • Next Steps: o MHDC draft Qualified Allocation Plan (QAP) is currently available. o Prepare other funding programs ■ Multi -Family w/LIHTC • Stronghold Landing received jurisdictional support for CDBG-DR and LIHTC o LIHTC applications are due September 23 ■ LIHTC recipients are announced by MHDC Commission in December 2023 Historic Preservation Fund (HPF) Paul Bruhn Revitalization Grant - $675,000 • Six applications were funded: o 109-111 Madison Street o 113-115 Madison Street o 114-122 E Dunklin o 114-A High Street o 206-210 E High Street o 300 E High Street • Next steps include: o Have applicants begin professional design and get National Parks Service approval based off Secretary of Interior's Standards. o Environmental Reviews are complete for all properties except 206-210 and 300 E High Street ■ 206-210 E High Street needs to satisfy structural issues before conservation easement can be executed and federal funds can be accessed. Building was declared dangerous on September 12. o Conservation Easements — site visits completed • Grant must be completed by September 30, 2024 Design Guidelines - $50,000 o Guide allows for historic preservation, new development, and redevelopment o Work session meeting held with H3 Studio consultants at the July 11 Historic Preservation Commission Meeting o H3 studio will present at the October 10 HPC meeting ■ Interested in participation regarding Capitol Avenue design guidelines West Main Phase II Architectural Survey - $23,000 o Lower Jefferson subdivision (West Main) o Stantec presented at the August 8 HPC Meeting State CDBG-CV Cole County EMS - $2,000,000 • Building an EMS facility on the corner of Adams and E. McCarty o Construction continues at the site • City is lead applicant State CDBG-CV - $689,760 • Compass Health Planning - $100,000 o Market analysis focused on special needs and vulnerable populations o Met with Compass Health staff on August 9 to discuss project • Transformational Housing - $544,000 o Rehabilitate 101 Jackson into transitional housing o Environmental Assessment is currently being reviewed by DED • MOA has been received and is in the process of being executed o Next Steps: • Public comment period (15 days for City/15 days for HUD) • Receive Authority to Use Grant Funds ® Administration - $45,760 (staff time) Community Revitalization Grant Program o MSP Demo and rehab of historic structures o Submitted for $2.1 million request; match is components of EDA grant o Participating in administrative kick-off meetings and reporting portal setup Department of Economic Development — American Rescue Plan Act Programs • Local Tourism Asset Development Grant o Hospitality development Mid -MO Solid Waste Management District Grants • Received $25,000 to repair and paint 3 glass recycling bins; $8,334 match out of already existing glass recycling budget. o Contracted to Xtreme Body and Paint ($18,500) ® Remaining funds will be used to buy Ripple purple paint and support educational outreach ■ Save -A -Lot bin is currently in the shop • Currently working with MMSWMD and Cole County to subsidize Household Hazardous Waste program. City currently budgets $19,000 with Cole County contributing $5,500. Pending Applications: Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant • Formula grant in the amount of $76,770 is entitled to Jefferson City o Need to produce an Energy Efficiency and Conservation Strategy plan ® Future block grants will be available for implementation • The plan will create a pipeline to larger funding mechanisms identified in the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law West Main Phase II Survey - $23,000 • Survey Jefferson Heights, Wolfss, Carlins Addition, and High Point Place subdivisions • Received notification of award; waiting on formal award paperwork Upcoming Opportunities: RAISE Grants — Due April every year • Funds up to $25 million in infrastructure projects • 20% match, potentially less depending on project • Opportunity to fund identified projects in: o Metropolitan Transportation Plan (pg. 102) Choice Neighborhood Planning Grant — Due July every year • Funds up to $500,000 for a two-year neighborhood Transformation Plan • Housing Authority is interested in pursuing • Transformation Plan implementation may be then pursued for up to $50 million Bridge Investment Program • High Street Viaduct o Need Benefit -Cost Analysis o Open Summer 2023 — City would need to plan for 2024 Airport Improvement Program • Jefferson City Airport eligible for $10.2 million over a 5 -year period o Nonprimary Entitlement o State Apportionment (MoDOT) o Small Airport Fund o Discretionary