HomeMy Public PortalAbout2024-03-07 packet
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as
required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request.
Please call (573) 634-6410 with questions regarding agenda items.
Technical Committee Thursday, March 7, 2024 at 10:00 a.m. Meeting Location: Boone-Bancroft Room, John G. Christy Municipal Building 320 E. McCarty, Jefferson City, MO 65101 - Enter through Main Lobby
THIS MEETING IS AVAILABLE VIRTUALLY TO JOIN VIRTUALLY: https://jeffersoncity.webex.com/jeffersoncity/j.php?MTID=mc52dc698b112e3b0b4463be78a511dd4 CALL-IN AVAILABLE AT: 1-404-397-1516 MEETING NUMBER: 2485 825 8464 MEETING PASSWORD: 1234
TENTATIVE AGENDA
1. Call to order, roll call, and determination of a quorum
2. Public comment
3. Adoption of the agenda as printed or amended
4. Approval of the minutes from the meeting of January 11, 2024
5. Communications Received
6. Old Business
A. CAMPO 2045 & Beyond Metropolitan Transportation Plan – Draft
Action Requested: Review and discussion Staff Report: Staff have begun the update of the CAMPO 2045 & Beyond Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP). The MTP assesses regional transportation needs over a twenty-year planning horizon by outlining goals, strategies, and projects for the CAMPO region. The MTP is federally required to be updated every five years and was last updated in 2019. Products and materials pertaining to the update of the MTP are reviewed and vetted by the Technical Committee. See attached staff report and link to draft document and survey results.
7. New Business
A. Traffic Study of US 54/63/50 Tri-Level Interchange – RFQ Selection Committee and Project Scope of Services Review
Action Requested: Review, discussion and recommendation of selection committee to Board of Directors
Staff Report: Staff are seeking review of Request for Qualifications/Scope of Services materials for the US
50/54/63 Tri-Level Interchange Study and formation of an RFQ selection committee to review and make recommendation on RFQ responses. See attached staff report.
B. 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) - Draft
Action Requested: Review and discussion
Staff Report: The TIP is a 5-year financial program of transportation projects to be implemented within the Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA), which are funded by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), or are deemed ‘regionally significant. The TIP is updated annually by CAMPO in cooperation with local jurisdictions, the Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT), and local public transportation operators. See attached staff report and draft document.
C. FY 2025 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) - Draft
Action Requested: Review and discussion
Staff Report: The UPWP is CAMPO’s annual statement of work identifying the budget, planning priorities, and activities to be carried out for the year (November 1 to October 31). The UPWP contains many ongoing activities required to perform the essential functions of CAMPO, as well as, periodic and one-time activities. The UPWP serves as the basis for funding agreements with the Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT). See attached staff report and draft document.
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization
Room 120 320 E. McCarty, Jefferson City, MO 65101 Phone 573.634.6410 Fax 573.634.6457
Agenda/Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Page 2 Technical Committee
8. Other Business
A. Status of Current Work Tasks
B. Member Updates
9. Next Meeting Date
Thursday, April 4, 2024 at 10:00 a.m. - Boone-Bancroft Room, City of Jefferson City Hall
10. Adjournment
MINUTES TECHNICAL COMMITTEE CAPITAL AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION January 11, 2023 VOTING MEMBERS PRESENT David Bange, Chair, City of Jefferson Eric Barron, City of Jefferson Steve Engelbrecht, MoDOT Shannon Kliethermes, Cole County Matt Prenger, Vice Chairman, Cole County
Eric Bowers as designee for Britt Smith, City of Jefferson Clint Smith, City of Jefferson Aaron Grefrath, City of Jefferson Gerry Stegeman, City of Jefferson Howard David Thomas, Callaway County Rachel Busche, City of Wardsville
Mike Henderson, MoDOT Daniel Roeger, MoDOT Kevin Schwartz, Bike/Ped Interest Matt Morasch, City of Jefferson VOTING MEMBERS ABSENT
Mark Tate, Holts Summit EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS PRESENT Cecelie Cochran, FHWA STAFF PRESENT (Non-Voting) Katrina Williams, Senior Planner Kortney Bliss, Planner
Tiphanie Pearson, Administrative Assistant GUESTS PRESENT
Paul Samson Gary Plummer Stephi Smith
Scott Spencer
1. Call to order, roll call, and determination of a quorum
Mr. Bange called the meeting to order at 10:09 a.m. and asked Ms. Pearson to call roll. A quorum of 15 voting members were present.
2. Public comment No public comment.
3. Adoption of the agenda as printed or amended Mr. Britt Smith moved and Mr. Kliethermes seconded to adopt the agenda as printed. The motion passed
unanimously.
4. Approval of the minutes from the meeting of December 7, 2023. Mr. Britt Smith moved and Mr. Prenger seconded to approve the minutes from the meeting of December 7, 2023 as written. The motion passed unanimously.
5. Communications Received No communications received.
Minutes/Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Technical Committee January 11, 2024 Page 2
6. Old Business
A. CAMPO 2045 & Beyond Metropolitan Transportation Plan – 2023-2024 Update
• Ms. Williams gave details on the plan and gave an update on what work needed to be done in the month of January. She stated that the public survey will close later this week and that staff has almost concluded presentations to jurisdictions. She stated that staff will begin writing, researching, analyzing, and integrating survey results. Mr. Bange asked what sort of timeframe this project will take and Ms. Williams stated it would take about a year to complete and she gave additional details about the extent of the project. Mr. Bange then asked when the deadline is for submittal and Ms. Williams stated that it was due by May 2024. There were no further questions.
7. New Business
A. Metropolitan Planning Area Boundary Review
• Mr. Barron gave details on the establishment of the new metropolitan planning area boundary. Mr. Barron stated that minimal changes were made to the existing boundary in order to accommodate inclusion of adjusted urban area. He also stated that minor adjustments were made to accommodate matching the new boundary with existing geographic boundaries such as municipal limits and census boundaries.
Mr. Henderson stated that he had forwarded a digital version of the boundary to MoDOT GIS staff for a preliminary review and doesn’t expect any changes are necessary. o Mr. Morasch moved and Mr. Britt Smith seconded to forward the proposed 2024 CAMPO
Metropolitan Planning Area Boundary to the Board of Directors for approval.
The motion passed unanimously.
B. Federal Functional Classification Review
• Mr. Barron provided an overview of the draft maps received from MoDOT that included to no changes to federal functional class. He explained that federal functional classification are the roads
currently eligible for federal aid. Staff is to submit any proposed changes to MoDOT. Mr. Barron stated there were no proposed changes. No questions from the Committee. o Mr. Morasch motioned and Mr. Britt Smith seconded to forward the Functional Classification maps to the Board of Directors for approval.
The motion passed unanimously.
C. FY 2024 UPWP Amendment – Proposed Tri-Level Study
• Mr. Barron stated that a JC REP proposed use of CAMPO and local funds at the December Board of Directors meeting. He also stated that this project was number two on the unfunded needs list
and was a high priority. He went on to state that an older study done in relation to this project was funded by Cole County. That study was to look into traffic volumes. Mr. Barron went over the estimated timeline for amending the UPWP to accommodate hiring a consultant to complete the study and highlighted important deadlines for the timeline. He stated that the project will be managed by the Jefferson City Public Works Department. There was then some discussion regarding scope of the project. Mr. Barron went on to explain the budget changes that would need
to take place within CAMPO, City of Jefferson, and Cole County. Mr. Barron stated that an amendment to the FY 2024 UPWP would be necessary to accommodate starting the RFQ process in 2024 and that staff could develop this amendment for the January Board of Directors meeting.
o Mr. Prenger motioned and Mr. Morasch seconded to forward to the Board of Directors for approval.
The motion passed unanimously.
8. Other Business
A. 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) – Annual update of the TIP is underway
• Ms. Williams stated that staff is starting the annual process of developing the TIP and is gathering information from MoDOT and other local jurisdictions on federally funded projects, budgets, and
Minutes/Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Technical Committee January 11, 2024 Page 3
maintenance costs. She stated that the deadline to get information back is February 28th. Ms. Williams went on to state that the TIP will be adopted by the Technical Committee and Board of Directors in May and then the Governor gives final approval in June. She stated she will give
more information in the February Technical Committee meeting.
B. FY 2025 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) – Annual development of the UPWP is underway
• Ms. Williams stated that this was an annual budget process that is required federally. She stated that the UPWP outlines work tasks staff will undertake in the the next fiscal year and went over the work elements. She stated that staff will be working on the Coordinated Public Transit – Human Services Transportation Plan and asked for information on any other potential new projects for FY
2025. More information will be provided at the next Technical Committee Meeting. There were no questions.
C. Status of Current Work Tasks
• Ms. Williams stated that staff is currently working on the following: o Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP)
o CAMPO Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA) Boundary Review o Federal Functional Classification Review
o Proposed US 54/63/50 Tri-Level Study o 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Development o FY 2025 Unified Planning Work Program Development (UPWP)
o Capital Area Active Transportation Plan o GIS/Technical Assistance o JEFFTRAN Transit Facility Feasibility Study
D. Member Updates
• Mr. Stegeman stated that the two new hybrid buses were in
• Mr. Britt Smith stated that plans are moving forward for the airport control tower
• Mr. Henderson stated that the state-wide planning partner meeting is February 29th
• Mr. Thomas introduced himself
• Mr. Prenger stated that conversations on the TAP projects are ongoing; and he also stated that the contractor is slated to start on the bridge on Friendship Road by February 1st
• Mr. Roeger stated that staffing continues to be an issue, however, the staff they have recently hired are being trained currently and it is going well
• Ms. Williams mentioned the National Child Passenger Safety Course
• Ms. Busche stated that there will be an open house at the new building coming up soon
• Mr. Grefrath gave an update on the Boggs Creek project
• Mr. Bange stated that the Greenway project is out to bid and is due back on January 23rd and he also stated that there is a new sewer main needed on the 179 bypass and it is out for construction by August
9. Next Meeting Date Thursday, February 1, 2023 at 10:00 a.m. in the Boone/Bancroft Room #200.
10. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 11:19 a.m.
Mr. Bange stated that we have come to the end of the meeting, so we stand adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Tiphanie Pearson, Administrative Assistant
Agenda Item 6A
CAMPO Technical Committee Staff Report
CAMPO 2045 & Beyond Metropolitan Transportation Plan – 2023-2024 Update March 7, 2024
Summary
The update of the CAMPO 2045 & Beyond Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) began in mid-2023. The MTP, is a long-range plan that assesses regional transportation needs over a twenty-year planning horizon. The MTP sets goals and defines policies, programs, strategies, and projects to meet the transportation needs of the CAMPO region. The MTP is federally required to by updated every 5 years and utilize a minimum 20-year planning horizon. The MTP was last updated in 2019. The Technical Committee is requested to review the materials linked below and provide feedback to staff. Thank you.
Progress Report February Staff focused on research, mapping, and writing the draft plan during the month of February. The draft document, provided in the link below, includes updates to several sections of the previous plan. The draft is very much a working
draft document. Updates thus far include integration of survey results, text updates, and changes to several charts, maps and graphics. New requirement stemming for the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) have been added to meet regulations.
Staff will provide an update on these changes and recommendations for edits to the illustrative list and implementation strategies, stemming from public/stakeholder input and analysis of new GIS data.
• Draft MTP Document: https://cms4files.revize.com/jeffersoncitymo/CAMPO2045_MTP_2024_Draft%2002.202024.pdf
• Survey Results: https://cms4files.revize.com/jeffersoncitymo/MTP%20Survey%20Data_All_240111.pdf
• Draft Illustrative List https://cms4files.revize.com/jeffersoncitymo/Illustrative%20Projects%20Section%20-%20DRAFT.pdf December/January Staff focused on public engagement, research, and writing the draft plan during the month of January. Staff closed the public survey January 12th. Survey results were reviewed and integrated into the plan. Staff and Technical Committee have produced a draft Illustrative Projects Section using input provided by the Technical Committee, Jurisdiction Staff, and stakeholders.
October/November In October and November staff worked with the Technical Committee and local jurisdictions to review and update the
Goals and Strategies, MTP Illustrative List, and Major Thoroughfare Plan. This process included discussion of new projects, completed projects, and the tier system used to categorize road and bridge projects. The Major Thoroughfare plan was updated and has been moved from the appendix to the Illustrative List section of the MTP.
Public Engagement - In October a meeting for local jurisdictions was held with discussion focused on projects outside of Jefferson City. In November three general stakeholder meetings were held requesting in put on the Goals and
Strategies, Illustrative List, and Major Thoroughfare Plan. Two public meeting were held in December; one in Jefferson City and one in Holts Summit. In November a public survey was released via email, social media, and during public presentations. As of December 14th, 190 responses have been received. Survey results will be presented at future CAMPO meetings and will inform that updates to the MTP goals and strategies. The survey will remain open through January 12th. Staff will continue presenting to all local jurisdictions in the CAMPO region throughout December and January. Additional presentations to other stakeholder groups will happen during this time.
Agenda Item 6A
Background The MTP is central to the MPO planning process and defines policies, programs, projects to meet regional needs for all transportation modes, including:
• Surface Transportation (roads and bridges)
• Pedestrian and Non-Motorized
• Transit
• Air
• Waterways & Ports
• Freight
• Rail The planning process will consider and incorporate several local and regional topics including transportation system
development, land use, employment, economic development, human and natural environment, and housing and community development. Per federal regulation, the MTP addresses the following ten planning factors: 1. Economic Vitality 2. Safety 3. Security 4. Accessibility and Mobility
5. Environmental Protection and Quality of Life 6. System Integration and Connectivity 7. System Management and Operation
8. System Preservation 9. Resiliency and Reliability 10. Travel and Tourism
The current plan, adopted in 2019, utilized an in-depth Scenario Planning process that analyzed how transportation, land use, resources, demographics, and other factors may affect connectivity, mobility, and resiliency throughout the region.
A preferred scenario was chosen and then used in the development of a Travel Demand Model (TDM). The TDM took the preferred land use scenario and analyzed the impacts of development on the transportation system, highlighting points of congestion, capacity, and increased demands on the road network. CAMPO staff then worked with the general
public and stakeholders to develop a list of illustrative projects, combining public comments and the TDM outputs.
The 2023-2024 planning process will use the preferred scenario and TDM from the 2019 planning process. This data, along with outreach to member jurisdictions, stakeholders, and the general public will be used in the update of the MTP.
Staff anticipates that the planning process will be complete in Summer 2024. A general timeline of the project is provided in Figure 1.
The current MTP document and information about the planning process can be found on the CAMPO website at:
https://www.jeffersoncitymo.gov/government/long_range_transportation_plan/Metropolitan_Transportation_Plan.php
Figure 1 – CAMPO 2045 & Beyond Metropolitan Transportation Plan 2023-2024 Update Timeline
Summer 2023
•Data Review /Update
•Coordination with Jurisdictions
•Review Goals and Strategies
Fall 2023 / Winter2024
•Assessment of Illlustrative List
•Research and Mapping
•Public Engagement
Winter/Spring 2024
•Prioritization & Implementation Review
•Draft Document Development
•Public Engagment
Summer 2023
•Draft Document
•Public Review/Comment
•MTP Adoption
Agenda Item 7A
CAMPO Technical Committee Staff Report US 54/63/50 Tri-Level Interchange Study – RFQ/Scope of Services Review and Selection Committee March 7, 2024
Summary Staff are seeking review of Request for Qualifications/Scope of Services materials for the US 50/54/63 Tri-Level Interchange Study and formation of an RFQ selection committee to review and make recommendation on RFQ responses.
Request for Qualifications Review The CAMPO Board of Directors approved the UPWP Amendment to move forward with the Tri-level interchange study
at a special Board of Directors meeting on January 24. JCREP and CAMPO/City Staff have prepared an RFQ notice (attached). Staff are seeking review of the draft RFQ and associated scope of services by the Technical Committee prior to moving forward with issuance of the RFQ.
The RFQ contains the following elements: - Purpose, Background, and Goals
- Study Area Description (and map) - List of Services o Traffic modeling and counts
o Safety analysis o Review existing conditions and plans. o Future traffic projections
o Develop reasonable alternatives o Traffic modeling and analysis of alternatives o Prepare exhibits of alternatives
o Prepare cost estimates of alternatives o Identify potential phasing plans
o Produce a Final Report - Follow environmental review processes. - Allowance for extension for additional services
- Project timeline - Point rating criteria
Staff would coordinate with the City Purchasing Agent to finalize the full RFQ package (containing all required documents including references to federal requirements) and coordinate with state and federal partners for any required review prior to posting the RFQ notice and distributing to known consulting firms.
RFQ Selection Committee After receipt of RFQ responses, a selection committee will review and score responses and make recommendation to the Board of Directors. Staff is seeking formation of a recommended list of selection committee members to forward to the
Board of Directors for approval. Recommended Form of Motion #1: Motion for approval of the draft RFQ materials.
Recommended Form of Motion #2: Motion to forward recommend RFQ Selection Committee list to the Board of Directors.
Jefferson City Tri-Level (US Route 50/54/63) Interchange and Rex Whitton Expressway
Planning Study – Request for Qualifications
Purpose. The purpose of this Request for Qualifications (RFQ) is to identify a consulting engineering firm to
undertake a comprehensive planning study for the US 50/54/63 Interchange (also known as the Tri-Level
Interchange) and US 50/63 between Jackson Street and the Tri-Level (also known as the Rex Whitton
Expressway), in Jefferson City, Missouri. The Tri-level and Expressway have been identified as regionally
significant needs within the CAMPO Metropolitan Transportation Plan. The Planning Study will analyze the
existing conditions and develop reasonable alternatives to address traffic congestion, traffic safety issues, and
vulnerable road user needs within the study area. The Planning Study will be utilized in a future NEPA
environmental review process.
Background. The existing “Tri-Level” interchange located in central Jefferson City is the confluence of US
Routes 50, 54, and 63, all of which are major highway corridors in the Mid-Missouri region. The Tri-Level was
originally constructed in the early 1960’s and currently services over 80,000 vehicles per day. While the Tri-
Level has been has seen numerous additions over the years, the existing lane and ramp configurations are
unconventional and are confusing for unfamiliar motorists. There are multiple stop and yield intersections as
well as merging/weaving conflicts. Oversize loads have difficulty maneuvering some of the turns causing
occasional roadway blockage. In general, the existing interchange is inadequate for existing traffic demand
which causes congestion, significant delay and safety issues.
US Route 50/63 east of the Tri-Level, known as the “Rex Whitton Expressway” was also constructed in the
early 1960’s and currently operates above capacity for much of the day which causes frequent delays for the
traveling public. The Expressway was the subject of an Environmental Impact Statement completed by
MoDOT in 2008. The Preferred Alternative included additional thru-lanes on Route 50/63, a number of
intersection improvements, grade separation structures at Madison Street and Jackson Street and a new
diamond interchange at Lafayette Street. The construction of the Lafayette Street interchange and Jackson
Street bridge have been completed.
Project Goal. The goal of this project is to identify highway system needs within the study area, develop
reasonable alternatives to address highway system needs, and develop cost estimates for reasonable
alternatives which will be utilized to pursue future funding opportunities and provide a vision for the future of
the study area.
Approximate Study Area. The approximate study area includes US Route 50 from west of Jackson Street to
Dix Road; US Route 54 from Linden Dr. overpass to the Missouri River; US Route 63 from west of Jackson
Street to the Missouri River; Business Route 50 (Missouri Boulevard) from Ohio Street to West McCarty Street;
as well as all major interchanges and intersections within the above routes. A map showing the approximate
limit for the study area is attached. The consultant will collaborate with local planning partners to determine the
final limits of the study area.
Planning Study Services. It is anticipated that services included in the Planning Study may include:
a. Perform traffic modeling and level of service analysis of existing conditions using MoDOT traffic
counts, collected traffic counts, the CAMPO Traffic Demand Model and other available data to
identify areas of concern within the study area.
b. Conduct safety analysis to identify high accident locations.
c. Perform other preliminary investigations such as as-builts plans, existing Right of Way, desktop
environmental review, bridge assessments, utility investigations, and activities necessary to
identify other areas of concern and/or project constraints.
d. Develop projections for future traffic patterns, volumes, and movements.
e. Develop reasonable alternative improvements that address identified areas of concern such as
deficient levels of service, high accident locations, pedestrian needs, and aging infrastructure.
The reasonable alternatives should include alternatives identified in the 2008 Rex Whitton EIS
with updated traffic volume projections.
f. Perform traffic modeling, level of service analysis and traffic safety analysis for reasonable
alternatives with current and future traffic volumes.
g. Prepare plan & profile exhibits of reasonable alternatives, including approximate construction
limits and existing/proposed Right of Way needs on a conceptual level.
h. Prepare rough order of magnitude cost estimates for construction of reasonable alternatives.
i. Identify potential phasing for implementation.
j. Produce a final Planning Study report.
Because the Planning Study will be utilized in a future NEPA environmental review process, the following shall
be included in the Planning Study:
a. The Planning Study shall be developed through a planning process conducted pursuant to
applicable Federal law.
b. Consult with the appropriate Federal and State resource agencies.
c. Develop a plan for the required consultation with Native American Tribes. All communication
with tribal organizations must be conducted through MoDOT Historic Preservation Section.
Tribal organizations shall not be contacted directly.
d. Include broad multidisciplinary consideration of systems-level or corridor-wide transportation
needs and potential effects, including effects on the human and natural environment.
e. Include public notice that the resulting planning products may be adopted during a subsequent
environmental review process in accordance with Section 168.
f. Conduct public meetings to gather input on existing challenges and proposed reasonable
alternatives.
g. Conduct specific stakeholder meetings with project partners, constituents along the corridors,
and review agencies.
The City may elect to extend this contract via supplemental agreement with the consultant to authorize future
additional services which may include:
a. Identify future funding opportunities and assist with associated grant applications
b. Surveying/Mapping/Property boundary surveys
c. Environmental Review / NEPA Document Development
d. Geotechnical Investigations
e. Noise Studies
f. Preliminary Plans
g. Right of Way Plans
h. Utility Coordination
i. Final Plans, Specifications & Estimate
j. Project support during construction
Proposed Project Timeline. Issue RFQ: March 31, 2024
RFQ Responses Due: April 19, 2024
Consultant Selected: May 8, 2024
Scoping Phase Complete: May 31, 2024
Consultant Contract : June 17, 2024
Study Phase Complete: T.B.D.
Consultant Selection. Consultant selection shall be conducted pursuant to the Brooks Act for Consultant
Selection and other applicable Federal and State regulations.
Rating Criteria w/ Weighted Values. The following criteria will be used to evaluate the submitted
qualifications.
Project Understanding & Approach 30 Points Max
Experience and Technical Competence 30 Points Max
Capacity & Capability 20 Points Max
Past Record of Performance 20 Points Max
100 Points Max Total
Agenda Item 7B
CAMPO Technical Committee Staff Report 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program Update March 7, 2024
Summary
The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a 5-year financial program of transportation projects to be implemented within the Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA). Projects in the program are funded by the Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), and are deemed ‘regionally significant.’ The TIP is updated annually by CAMPO in cooperation with local jurisdictions, the Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT), and local public transportation operators.
The CAMPO TIP year runs from July 1, 2024 to June 30, 2029. The draft 2025-2029 TIP currently includes 46 projects that total over $112 million dollars. Please note that all project information has not been received, new projects may be added and some removed in the coming weeks. Updated financial data for the jurisdictions within the CAMPO region are used to demonstrate fiscal constraint, which is the availability of local matching funds for federal transportation dollars. Other important components of the TIP include:
• Protocol for TIP Development: Public Participation, Project Selection, Amendments, and Modifications
• CAMPO Federal Performance Measures: Performance Measures and targets uses system information to make investment and policy decisions to achieve national goals. The CAMPO Technical Committee and Board of
Directors reviews and approves these performance measures and targets at regular intervals, per federal guidelines. The TIP includes totals for programmed funds that address these performance measures.
• Financial Plan: Each year staff works with local jurisdictions to collect required financial data. This financial data, used to illustrate fiscal constraint, includes general tax revenue, local operating assistance, operations and maintenance estimates, and transportation grants. This data provides for creating current and forecasted totals of
available and programmed funds. The 5-year 2025-2029 total of available funds and programmed funds total include funds from MoDOT, FHWA, FTA, and local jurisdiction budgets. These totals are subject to change during the month of March after new project costs estimates are received from MoDOT.
• Fiscally Constrained Transportation Projects: The list of fiscally constrained projects includes all projects programmed for construction or scoping that utilize federal transportation funds. Most projects in the CAMPO
TIP are MoDOT sponsored and are also listed in the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). The 2024-2028 CAMPO TIP includes nine (9) Bridge Projects, eight (8) Road Projects, four (4) Other/Enforcement projects, eight (8) Scoping Projects, nine (9) Pedestrian/Bicycle Projects, and eight (8)
Transit Projects.
• JEFFTRAN Program of Projects: The Program of Projects, federally required for public transportation agencies,
is an illustrative list of projects and estimated costs. MoDOT Projects
MoDOT will provide CAMPO staff with an updated project list and cost estimates after the March 7th CAMPO Technical Committee meeting. MoDOT staff has stated that it is unlikely that new projects will be added. An updated TIP document will be provided to Technical Committee members after incorporation of the MoDOT project updates.
Staff requests that Technical Committee members please review the draft document and provide comments to Katrina Williams at 573-634-6536 or by email at kawilliams@jeffersoncitymo.gov. A draft 2025-2029 CAMPO TIP is attached.
DRAFT
Transportation Improvement Program
Program Years 2025-2029
July 1, 2024 – June 30, 2029
Adopted May 15, 2024
Note: Items in RED are in draft form and have
not been verified
The preparation of this report was financed in part by the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration,
and Federal Transit Administration in cooperation with the Missouri Department of Transportation. The opinions, findings, and
conclusions expressed in this report are not necessarily those of the Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit
Administration, or the Missouri Department of Transportation.
Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as
required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request.
DRAFT
Table of Contents
Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 1
Public Participation ................................................................................................................................. 2
Project Selection ...................................................................................................................................... 2
TIP Development ..................................................................................................................................... 2
TIP Amendments and Administrative Modifications ............................................................................... 3
Previous Projects ................................................................................................................................. 3
Annual Listing of Obligated Projects ...................................................................................................... 3
Air Quality Designation .......................................................................................................................... 3
Environmental Justice ............................................................................................................................. 3
Federal Performance Measures ............................................................................................................... 4
Financial Plan ......................................................................................................................................... 6
Forecast Revenue Available for Transportation Funding .................................................................... 6 Operations and Maintenance .............................................................................................................. 8
Financial Constraint .............................................................................................................................. 10 Demonstration of Fiscal Constraint – Municipalities ......................................................................... 11 Demonstration of Fiscal Constraint – Public Transportation Providers .............................................. 12 Fiscally Constrained Transportation Projects – Bridges ..................................................................... 13 Fiscally Constrained Transportation Projects - Roadways ................................................................ 16
Fiscally Constrained Transportation Projects - Other ........................................................................ 19
Fiscally Constrained Transportation Projects – Scoping and Design Projects .................................... 21
Fiscally Constrained Transportation Projects - Pedestrian & Bicycle Projects .................................... 24
Fiscally Constrained Transportation Projects – Public Transportation Projects .................................. 27
Project Locations - Figure 7 - Map of Fiscally Constrained Transportation Projects .......................... 30
Program of Projects ........................................................................................................................... 31
Multimodal Projects .............................................................................................................................. 32
Regionally Significant Projects ............................................................................................................. 32
Appendix 1 – Amendments and Administrative Modifications ............................................................ 33
Appendix 2 – Federal Funding Sources ................................................................................................ 34
Appendix 3 – Policies and Procedures ................................................................................................. 35
Appendix 4 – Definitions ...................................................................................................................... 38
CAMPO Title VI Nondiscrimination Policy The Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization is committed to the policy that no person shall be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, in
accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 (P.L. 100.259).
Administration of the Capital Area MPO is provided by the City of Jefferson Department of Planning and Protective Services
Room 120 John G. Christy Municipal Building
320 East McCarty St., Jefferson City, Missouri 65101 Phone: (573) 634-6410 Fax: (573) 634-6457
http://www.jeffersoncitymo.gov/campo
DRAFT
CAMPO 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program i
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
FTA 5303 Metropolitan & Statewide Planning and Non-Metropolitan Transportation Planning
FTA 5307 Urbanized Area Formula Grants
FTA 5310 Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities
FTA 5339 Bus and Bus Facilities
Adv. Con. Advanced Construction
AM Asset Management (Replaces TCOS in 2022)
CAMPO Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization
CO Carbon Monoxide (vehicle emissions)
EPA Environmental Protection Agency
FAST Fixing America’s Surface
Transportation Act
FHWA Federal Highway Administration
FTA Federal Transit Administration
FY Fiscal Year
HSIP Highway Safety Improvement Program
MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century
MoDOT Missouri Department of Transportation
MPO Metropolitan Planning Organization
MTP Metropolitan Transportation Plan
NHFP National Highway Freight Program
NHPP National Highway Performance
Program
NO2 Nitrogen Dioxide
ONE DOT Collaboration between FHWA and FTA
PBPP Performance Based Planning and Programming
PM-2.5 Small Particulate Matter Lead
POP Program of Projects
PY Program Year
SO2 Sulfur Dioxide
STIP State Transportation Improvement Program
STBG Surface Transportation Block Grant Program
TAP Transportation Alternatives
TCOS Taking Care of the System
TERM Transit Economic Requirements Model
TDM Travel Demand Model
TIP Transportation Improvement Program
TPM Transportation Performance Management
VMT Vehicle Miles of Travel
DRAFT
CAMPO 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program ii
Resolution
DRAFT
CAMPO 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program iii
MTP Process Certification
DRAFT
CAMPO 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program iv
Certification of Restrictions on Lobbying
DRAFT
CAMPO 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program v
ONE DOT Approval Letter
DRAFT
CAMPO 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program vi
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization
Board of Directors
Chair – Jeff Hoelscher, Eastern District Commissioner, Cole County
Vice-Chair – Scott Spencer, City Council Member, City of Jefferson
City of Jefferson
Jack Deeken, City Council Member Jon Hensley, City Council Member Jeff Ahlers, City Council Member
Clint Smith, AICP, Director, Planning & Protective Services
Gerry Stegeman, Interim Transit Manager
Matt Morasch, PE, Director, Public Works Cole County Eric Landwehr, PE, Director, Public Works Doug Reece, City Administrator, St. Martins
Callaway County
Roger Fischer, Western District Commissioner
Holts Summit
Brandon Ruediger, City Administrator, City of Holts Summit Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) Machelle Watkins, PE, District Engineer
Ex-Officio Members
Luke Holtschnieder, Jefferson City Regional Economic Partnership
Daniel Nguyen, Federal Transit Administration, Region VII Christy Evers, MoDOT Transit Administrator Vacant, Missouri Office of Administration
Michael Henderson, AICP, MoDOT, Transportation Planning
Dan Weitkamp, Federal Highway Administration, Missouri Div.
Tamara Tateosian, Callaway County Economic Development
Technical Committee
Chair – David Bange, PE, City Engineer, Public Works, City of Jefferson
Vice-Chair – Matt Prenger, PE, County Engineer, Public Works, Cole County
City of Jefferson
Clint Smith, AICP, Director, Planning & Protective Services Aaron Grefrath, Director, Parks, Recreation & Forestry Matt Morasch, PE, Director of Public Works
Gerry Stegeman, Interim Transit Manager
Eric Barron, AICP, Transportation Planner
Britt Smith, PE, Operations & Maintenance Cole County Matt Prenger, PE, County Engineer
Shannon Kliethermes, Senior Planner
Callaway County Howard Thomas, PE, County Highway Administrator Small City Representative - Callaway Mark Tate, Streets Department, City of Holts Summit
Small City Representative - Cole
Rachel Busche, Wardsville Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) Steve Engelbrecht, PE, District Planning Manager
Michael Henderson, AICP, Transportation Planning Specialist
Daniel Roeger, PE, Area Engineer
Private Transportation Interest Joe Scheppers, N.H. Scheppers Distributing Company. Pedestrian or Biking Interest
Kevin Schwartz, JC Parks Outdoor Recreation Program Manager
Ex-Officio Members: Daniel Nguyen, Federal Transit Administration, Region VII Daniel Weitkamp, Federal Highway Administration, Missouri Div. Jason Branstetter, Heartland Port Authority Representative
- February 2024
CAMPO Staff
Clint Smith – Director, Planning & Protective Services
Eric Barron, AICP - Planning Manager
Katrina Williams, GISP, AICP – Senior Planner
Vacant - Planner
Lisa Dittmer – Administrative Assistant
DRAFT
CAMPO 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program 1
Introduction
The Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO) is the designated metropolitan planning
organization for the Jefferson City, Missouri Urban Area. CAMPO’s purpose is to carry out a continuing,
cooperative, and comprehensive long-range transportation planning process. As part of this process CAMPO
updates the Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) with the latest program year TIP, to address the current and
future transportation needs for the Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA). The MPA includes a southern portion of
Callaway County, northeastern portion of Cole County, the communities of Holts Summit, Jefferson City, St. Martins,
Taos, and Wardsville.
Figure 1 – The CAMPO Planning Area
The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a 5-year financial program of transportation projects to be
implemented within the MPA. The projects are funded by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal
Transit Administration (FTA), or are deemed “regionally significant.” Each project or project phase included in the
TIP is consistent with investment strategies discussed in the MTP and is part of the process of applying for funds
from the FHWA and FTA. Certain capital and non-capital transportation projects using funding under 23 U.S.C.
and 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53 or regionally significant projects requiring action by the FHWA or the FTA are required
to be included in the TIP. The TIP is updated annually by CAMPO in cooperation with the Missouri Department of
Transportation and local public transportation operators.
DRAFT
CAMPO 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program 2
Public Participation
CAMPO seeks active and meaningful involvement of the public and interested parties in the development and
update of transportation plans and programs, including the TIP. All meetings of the CAMPO Technical Committee
and Board of Directors are open to the public. All meeting agendas and minutes are available on the City of
Jefferson website at www.jeffersoncitymo.gov or upon request. CAMPO provides all interested parties and the
public with a reasonable opportunity to comment on the proposed TIP as required by federal law. Reasonable
opportunity to comment and participate on the proposed TIP is made following the policies in the CAMPO Public
Participation Plan located on the CAMPO website at https://www.jeffersoncitymo.gov/campo. The approved TIP
is available for review at several locations throughout the CAMPO planning area as outlined in the Public
Participation Plan.
The FTA allows a grantee, e.g. JEFFTRAN and OATS, Inc., to rely on locally adopted public participation plans for
the submittal of their projects in lieu of a separate “Program of Projects” (POP) if the grantee has coordinated with
CAMPO and has ensured that the public is aware that the TIP and the Public Participation Plan are being used to
satisfy the POP public participation requirements. JEFFTRAN is the public transit provider for the City of Jefferson
and OATS, Inc. is a not-for-profit 501(c)3 corporation providing specialized transportation for senior citizens,
people with disabilities and the rural general public in 87 Missouri counties. Federal Transit Administration
recipients of certain categories of funds, JEFFTRAN and OATS, Inc. must follow a public participation plan. Both
JEFFTRAN and OATS, Inc. meet this coordination and public awareness criteria.
Project Selection
Transportation projects, funded by direct allocation of Federal funds to a project sponsor, award of Federal funds
via competitive grant, or wholly funded by the sponsor, are selected by the agency having jurisdiction over the
project using their own criteria and submitted to the CAMPO Board of Directors for inclusion in the TIP.
Transportation projects included within the TIP should be consistent with investment strategies discussed in the MTP.
CAMPO does not receive any discretionary funding for infrastructure projects. If such funds again become
available, the following prioritization process is in place.
Transportation projects, funded by sub-allocated Federal funds directly to CAMPO or otherwise made available
for programming at the discretion of CAMPO, are selected based on competitive process approved by the CAMPO
Board of Directors. This process involves a call for projects, ranking based on CAMPO priorities by staff, and
review by the CAMPO Technical Committee, prior to being forwarded to the CAMPO Board of Directors for a vote
of approval. The ranking process has unique evaluation criteria for different categories of projects –
roadway/intersection, bridge, non-motorized, transit, and ‘other.’
TIP Development
The TIP document is updated every year and covers a 5-year period starting July 1 of each year. TIP development
begins with a verification of status of projects in the current TIP, solicitation of new projects, and request for budget
information from local jurisdictions. Local transit providers are also requested to provide information needed to
develop their “Program of Projects” for inclusion in the TIP. CAMPO staff develops the financial plan, project
listings, maintenance and operations, and other components of the TIP with support from the Technical Committee,
member jurisdictions, MoDOT, FHWA, and FTA.
Once the draft TIP is developed, it is presented to the Technical Committee for review and recommendation to the
Board of Directors. A 25-day public comment period will open and be held prior to the Board of Directors
approval of the TIP. The Board then requests approval of the TIP by the Governor and ONE DOT (consisting of
FHWA and FTA).
DRAFT
CAMPO 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program 3
TIP Amendments and Administrative Modifications
Between TIP updates, if projects need to be added, removed or changed, the TIP can be changed either by
amendment or administrative modifications. Definitions of an amendment or an administrative modification, and
information about public participation, notifications, and other procedures regarding amendments and
administrative modifications, can be found in Appendix 3 – Policies and Procedures of this document. Appendix 1
contains a listing of amendments and administrative modifications that have occurred to this document.
Previous Projects
The TIP will include a listing of major projects from the previous TIP that were implemented and identify any
significant delays in the planned implementation of major projects. Major projects are defined as transportation
improvement projects receiving Federal financial assistance with an estimated total cost of $500 million or more or
that have been identified by the FHWA as being a major project.
No major projects were implemented, and no significant delays or projects from the previous TIP have been
identified. No work on a federally funded project can begin until the scope of work has been authorized and the
federal funds obligated in the FHWA Financial Management Information System (FMIS).
Annual Listing of Obligated Projects
The Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act) requires that CAMPO publish an annual listing of
federally obligated projects. The Annual Listing of Projects is an index of projects which used Federal funds that
were obligated in the preceding TIP program year. Obligated projects are consistent with the funding categories
identified in the TIP.
An obligation is the Federal government’s legal commitment to pay the Federal share of a project’s cost. An
obligated project is one that has been authorized and funds have been obligated by a Federal agency. Obligated
projects are not necessarily initiated or completed in the program year, and the amount of the obligation will not
necessarily equal the total cost of the project. For Federal Transit Administration projects, obligation occurs when
the grant is awarded. For Federal Highway Administration projects, obligation occurs when a project agreement is
executed and the State/grantee requests that the funds be obligated.
CAMPO publishes the Annual Listing of Obligated Projects yearly, within 90 days of the previous TIP’s program
year. The Annual Listing of Obligated Projects is posted on the CAMPO website at:
http://www.jeffersoncitymo.gov/campo
Air Quality Designation
The United States Environmental Protection Agency has designated the CAMPO Metropolitan Planning Area as
being in attainment for Ozone, Carbon Monoxide (CO), Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), Small Particulate Matter (PM-
2.5) Lead, and Sulfur Dioxide (SO2). If the air quality in a geographic area meets or is cleaner than the national
standard, it is called an attainment area; areas that don't meet the national standard are called nonattainment
areas.
Environmental Justice
Executive Order 12898 requires agencies receiving federal funding to meaningfully address low-income and
minority populations in their plans, programs, policies, and activities. CAMPO strives to include all people, including
protected classes, in planning activities. The CAMPO Title VI Program addresses this topic. Additionally, CAMPO
staff expects project sponsors to identify and mitigate any disproportionately high and adverse effects of federal
transportation programs.
DRAFT
CAMPO 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program 4
Federal Performance Measures
In the passage of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21). FHWA defines Transportation
Performance Management (TPM) as a strategic approach that uses system information to make investment and
policy decisions to achieve national performance goals. The FAST (Fixing America’s Surface Transportation) Act
and Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act both provided for continuation of these goals.
Another requirement, Performance Based Planning and Programming (PBPP), refers to the application of
performance management principles within the planning and programming processes of transportation agencies to
achieve desired performance outcomes for the multimodal transportation system.
To comply with these requirements, the CAMPO Board of Directors adopts targets for the five performance areas
listed below. These measures and corresponding targets can be found in the System Performance Report located
in Appendix C of the Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP). CAMPO usually adopts the state targets when they
are updated.
Transit Asset Management Measures
MoDOT collected and evaluated existing buses and facilities to be included in the State Transit Asset Management
Plan and used this information to set targets, which will be evaluated on an annual basis as inventory changes.
JEFFTRAN participates in the State Transit Asset Management Plan.
There is approximately $20,469,897 in project funding programmed into this TIP that may be utilized for bus
replacement and other capital projects to help transit agencies move toward these targets.
Safety Measures
The Federal Highway Administration established five performance measures to assess performance and carry out
the Highway Safety Improvement Program: (1) number of fatalities, (2) rate of fatalities per vehicle mile traveled
(VMT), (3) number of serious injuries, (4) rate of serious injuries per VMT, and (5) number of combined non-motorized
fatalities and non-motorized serious injuries.
MoDOT established the statewide safety targets in 2021, which were adopted by CAMPO. These targets are
updated annually. These targets can be found in the System Performance Report located in Appendix C of the
Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP).
There are a number of projects programmed for safety in the TIP, totaling $124,353,066, all sponsored by the
Central District of MoDOT, to help the State move towards these targets. CAMPO staff also actively participates
in the Central District Coalition of Roadway Safety, which works to implement Missouri’s Show-Me Zero ultimate
goal of zero fatalities on Missouri roadways, and participates in the annual Highway Safety and Traffic Blueprint
Conference.
Pavement and Bridge Measures
The Federal Highway Administration established 6 performance measures to assess pavement and bridge
conditions: (1) percent of interstate pavements in Good condition, (2) percent of interstate pavements in Poor
condition, (3) percent of non-interstate national highway system (NHS) pavements in Good condition, (4) percent of
non-interstate NHS pavements in Poor condition, (5) percent of NHS bridges by deck area classified as Good
condition, and (6) percent of NHS bridges by deck area classified as Poor condition. There are no interstate
highways in the CAMPO region, so those targets are not addressed.
MoDOT established statewide pavement and bridge targets in 2018, and revised in 2020, which shows the targets
set by MoDOT and adopted by CAMPO. These targets may be updated every other year. These targets can be
found in the System Performance Report located in Appendix C of the Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP).
DRAFT
CAMPO 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program 5
Many projects in the TIP address Asset Management, a major priority for MoDOT. There is currently $7,524,000
in project funding in the TIP that addresses road and/or bridge maintenance or scoping.
Travel Time Reliability and Freight Reliability
The Federal Highway Administration established 3 performance measures to assess travel time reliability and
freight movement on the interstate system: (1) Percent of Reliable Person-Miles Traveled on the Interstate, (2)
Percent of Reliable Person-Miles Traveled on the Non-Interstate NHS, and (3) Truck Travel Time Reliability Index.
There are no interstate highways in the CAMPO region.
MoDOT established the travel time reliability targets in 2018, which was adopted by CAMPO. This target may
be updated every other year. These targets can be found in the System Performance Report located in Appendix
C of the Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP).
There are currently no projects programmed into the TIP with the sole purpose of improving travel time reliability.
Several of the projects within the TIP address this target indirectly, which will help the state move toward this target.
Transit Safety Measures
The Federal Transit Administration requires that each Public Transportation Agency establish a Public Transportation
Agency Safety Plan (PTASP). This plan utilizes existing agency safety practices and industry best practices to meet
the new regulations set in 49 CFR Part 673 of the Federal regulations. The PTASP includes formal documentation
to guide the agency in proactive safety management policy, safety risk management, safety assurance, and safety
promotion. The goal is to provide management and labor with a comprehensive and collaborative approach to
managing safety. The plan includes the process and schedule for an annual review of the plan to review the safety
performance measures and update processes that may be needed to improve the organization’s safety practices.
There is currently $352,719 in project funding in the TIP that addresses road and/or bridge maintenance or
scoping. Other projects within the TIP address these targets indirectly, which will help transit agencies move toward
these targets.
DRAFT
CAMPO 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program 6
Financial Plan
The TIP includes a financial plan that demonstrates how the approved TIP can be implemented, and indicates
resources from public and private sources that are reasonably expected to be made available to carry out the
TIP. CAMPO, MoDOT, and public transportation operators cooperatively develop estimates of funds that are
reasonably expected to be available to support TIP implementation. Only projects for which construction or
operating funds can reasonably be expected to be available may be included. In developing the financial plan,
CAMPO takes into account all projects and strategies funded under Title 23 U.S.C., Title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53,
and other federal funds, and regionally significant projects that are not federally funded. For purposes of
transportation operations and maintenance, the financial plan shall contain system-level estimates of costs and
revenue sources that are reasonably expected to be available to adequately operate and maintain Federal-aid
highways (as defined by Title 23 U.S.C. 101(a)(5) and public transportation (as defined by Title 49 U.S.C. Chapter
53).
Forecast Revenue Available for Transportation Funding
Federal funding forecasts, provided by MoDOT based on published notices in the Federal Register, estimate fiscal
year authorization levels by the FHWA and FTA under the current highway act. Appendix 2 briefly describes most
of the Federal transportation programs which could fund projects in the CAMPO planning area.
For Federally-funded projects, the TIP must identify the appropriate “matching funds” by source. The matching
funds are usually provided by state and local governments. State revenue forecasts are also provided by MoDOT
based on historical data of the State Fuel Tax, State Vehicle Sales and Use Tax and General Revenue.
Local revenue forecast from the County Aid Road Trust (State Fuel Tax and State Vehicle Sales and Use Tax) for
each jurisdiction are based on past distributions and are assumed to continue a trend of a two percent inflation
rate. The City of Jefferson has a ½ cent sales tax to support its Capital Improvement Program and a ½ cent sales
tax for Parks and Recreation, which supports greenways and other non-motorized transportation activities. The
City of Jefferson has provided its own future revenue projections from these sources. St. Martins has a one-cent
sales tax for parks and streets. Cole County has a ½ cent sales tax to support its Capital Improvement Program
and a real property tax levy of $0.27 earmarked for Road & Bridges. All small cities get $100,000 every five
years from Cole County, which comes from the aforementioned sales tax. Callaway County has a real property
tax levy of $0.2466 earmarked for Road & Bridges.
Figure 2 shows the total programmed project funds and available project funds by source. The project costs have
inflation factored in by each project sponsor. The instructions on the form used to submit a project for inclusion in
the TIP reminds the project sponsor to take inflation into account when estimating the project’s cost. Since the last
iteration of the MTP, the inflation factor for the TIP has been set as two percent.
DRAFT
CAMPO 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program 7
Figure 2 – Programmed Funds and Available Project Funds by Source
Please note this chart has not been updated at this time and reflects the totals for the
previous years’ projects.
2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 Total
FHWA AC - STBG $237,600 $5,481,600 $1,098,400 $2,419,200 $0 $9,236,800
FHWA NHPP $29,148,000 $1,984,000 $2,527,200 $2,097,600 $700,800 $36,457,600
FHWA HSIP $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FHWA STBG $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FHWA TAP $1,782,136 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,782,136
FHWA SAFETY $51,200 $51,200 $51,200 $0 $0 $153,600
FHWA BRO $83,336 $968,897 $0 $0 $0 $1,052,233
FHWA BFP $51,226 $102,863 $0 $0 $0 $154,089
FHWA RTP $128,850 $0 $0 $0 $0 $128,850
FTA 5307 $2,124,018 $1,106,836 $1,162,178 $1,220,287 $1,281,301 $6,894,620
FTA 5310 $172,000 $172,000 $270,000 $182,000 $270,000 $1,066,000
FTA 5311 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FTA 5329 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FTA 5339 $954,953 $10,175 $0 $0 $0 $965,128
$34,733,319 $9,877,571 $5,108,978 $5,919,087 $2,252,101 $57,891,056
MoDOT STATE $11,922,014 $6,983,214 $5,370,614 $5,844,214 $4,626,614 $34,746,670
$11,922,014 $6,983,214 $5,370,614 $5,844,214 $4,626,614 $34,746,670
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$5,438 $102,863 $0 $0 $0 $108,301
$62,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $62,500
$1,609,806 $1,106,836 $1,162,178 $1,220,287 $1,281,301 $6,380,408
$311,100 $30,544 $28,000 $28,000 $28,000 $425,644
$127,078 $0 $0 $0 $0 $127,078
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$105,909 $0 $0 $0 $0 $105,909
$60,000 $60,000 $92,000 $70,000 $92,000 $374,000
$2,281,831 $1,300,243 $1,282,178 $1,318,287 $1,401,301 $7,583,840
$48,937,164 $18,161,028 $11,761,770 $13,081,588 $8,280,016
$100,221,566
2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 Total
FHWA AC - STBG $237,600 $5,481,600 $1,098,400 $2,419,200 $0 $9,236,800
FHWA NHPP $29,148,000 $1,984,000 $2,527,200 $2,097,600 $700,800 $36,457,600
FHWA HSIP $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FHWA STBG $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FHWA TAP $1,782,136 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,782,136
FHWA SAFETY $51,200 $51,200 $51,200 $0 $0 $153,600
FHWA BRO $83,336 $968,897 $0 $0 $0 $1,052,233
FHWA BFP $51,226 $102,863 $0 $0 $0 $154,089
FHWA RTP $128,850 $0 $0 $0 $0 $128,850
FTA 5307 $2,124,018 $1,106,836 $1,162,178 $1,220,287 $1,281,301 $6,894,620
FTA 5310 $172,000 $172,000 $270,000 $182,000 $270,000 $1,066,000
FTA 5311 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FTA 5329 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FTA 5339 $954,953 $10,175 $0 $0 $0 $965,128
$34,733,319 $9,877,571 $5,108,978 $5,919,087 $2,252,101 $57,891,056
MoDOT STATE $11,922,014 $6,983,214 $5,370,614 $5,844,214 $4,626,614 $34,746,670
$11,922,014 $6,983,214 $5,370,614 $5,844,214 $4,626,614 $34,746,670
$6,445,639 $6,574,552 $6,706,043 $6,840,164 $6,976,967 $33,543,364
$41,501,299 $42,331,325 $43,177,952 $44,041,511 $44,922,341 $215,974,429
$1,840,593 $1,877,404 $1,914,953 $1,953,252 $1,992,317 $9,578,518
$39,756,287 $40,551,413 $41,362,441 $42,189,690 $43,033,484 $206,893,314
$4,957,247 $3,465,951 $3,553,208 $3,654,250 $3,759,055 $19,389,711
$1,215,100 $1,239,402 $1,264,190 $1,289,473 $1,315,263 $6,323,427
$322,556 $329,007 $335,587 $342,299 $349,145 $1,678,593
$357,514 $364,665 $371,958 $379,397 $386,985 $1,860,520
$120,000 $228,000 $140,000 $228,000 $140,000 $856,000
$96,516,235 $96,961,718 $98,826,331 $100,918,035 $102,875,556 $496,097,875
$143,171,567 $113,822,503 $109,305,923 $112,681,336 $109,754,271
$588,735,601Total Available Funds
Yearly Totals
Local Totals
Total Programmed Total
Available Funds
Federal
Toas
State
Local
Callaway County
Cole County
Wardsville
Oats
Programmed Funds
Federal
Holts Summit
State
Federal Totals
State Totals
Local
Federal Totals
Oats
Yearly Totals
Local Totals
JEFFTRAN
St. Martins
Taos
Wardsville
Callaway County
Cole County
Holts Summit
City of Jefferson
State Totals
City of Jefferson
JEFFTRAN
St. Martins
DRAFT
CAMPO 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program 8
Operations and Maintenance
MoDOT
Maintenance costs for MoDOT includes salaries, materials and equipment needed to deliver the roadway and
bridge maintenance programs. This category includes basic maintenance activities like minor surface treatments
such as: sealing, small concrete repairs and pothole patching; mowing right of way; snow removal; replacing signs;
striping; repairing guardrail; and repairing traffic signals. Performing these activities requires employees; vehicles
and other machinery; and materials such as salt, asphalt and fuel. Maintenance operations expenditures are
provided annually by MoDOT. Maintenance operations expenditures are expected to increase 1.5% annually.
MoDOT’s cost per lane mile is $5,323, ($5,323 per lane mile x 344.8 lane miles = $1,835,370 annual cost), and
can be seen in Figure 4.
Local Government
Local revenue sources for operations and maintenance include state fuel tax, state vehicles sales/use tax, local
sales taxes, franchise fees, license and permit fees, property taxes, and other revenue sources that provide
significant resources for local general fund and specific funding of transportation. Not all taxes and fees go to
transportation, so the local jurisdiction usually will identify a budget specifically for transportation purposes, such
as capital improvements, Road and Bridge funds, transit operating subsidies, road and street budgets, or operations
and maintenance budgets. Maintenance operations expenditures are expected to increase 1.5% annually.
The operations and maintenance costs for local governments include salaries, fringe benefits, materials, and
equipment needed to deliver the street and bridge maintenance programs. This category includes basic
maintenance activities like minor surface treatments such as sealing, small concrete repairs, pothole patching,
mowing, snow removal, replacing signs, striping, and repairing traffic signals. These activities may be performed
in-house or outsourced.
Local government operations and maintenance on federal aid roads calculated for the system wide average of
operations & maintenance per centerline mile is determined below in Figure 4. As a further demonstration of fiscal
constraint, another requirement is that municipalities report their operations and maintenance budget. Reported
below are Cole and Callaway Counties, Holts Summit, Jefferson City, St. Martins, and MoDOT. The municipalities
of Taos and Wardsville do not have any locally maintained roadways that are eligible for federal-aid..
There are 571 miles of Federal-Aid eligible roadway in the CAMPO region. MoDOT is responsible for the
maintenance of all “State System” roadways (370 miles) while “Off System” roadways are the responsibility of
the local governments (201 miles), shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3 - Federal Aid Eligible Road Mileage by Jurisdiction.
Jurisdiction
State System
Lane Miles
Local
Lane Miles Total
Callaway Co.33 11 44
Cole Co.121 28 149
Holts Summit 18 14 32
Jefferson City 171 143 314
St. Martins 11 4 15
Taos 9 0 9
Wardsville 8 0 8
Total 370 201 571
DRAFT
CAMPO 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program 9
Figure 4 – Locally Owned Federal-aid System Mileage and Operations and Maintenance Costs by Jurisdiction
Transit
In addition to the local government operations and maintenance previously discussed, JEFFTRAN expenses also
cover fleet repair/maintenance, repairing/replacing bus shelters, bus washing, bus maintenance facilities, public
restrooms, and fuel. Figures 5 and 6 show the estimated expenditures for transit operations and maintenance for
JEFFTRAN and OATS, respectively.
Operations and Maintenance revenue and expenditures are based on the most recently available budgets.
Figure 5 - JEFFTRAN Estimated Expenditures for Operations & Maintenance.
Source: FY 2024 Jefferson City Budget
Figure 6 – OATS Estimated Expenditures for Operations & Maintenance.
Cost/Lane Mile Local
Lane Miles
Local
O&M Cost
$6,458 11 $71,038
$6,935 28 $194,180
$4,778 14 $66,892
$7,209 143 $1,030,887
$7,146 4 $28,584
$5,291 0 $0
$5,291 0 $0
200 1,391,581$
Cost/Lane Mile State System
Lane Miles
MoDOT
O&M Cost
$5,323 370 $1,969,510
State System
MoDOT
Locally owned federal-aid system lane miles for each jurisdiction were developed by MoDOT
Source: MoDOT
Jurisdiction
St. Martins
Taos
Wardsville
Total
Callaway County
Jefferson City
Holts Summit
Cole County
Personnel Services (1,820,479)$ (1,856,889)$ (1,894,026)$ (1,931,907)$ (1,970,545)$ Materials and Supplies (335,080)$ (341,782)$ (348,617)$ (355,590)$ (362,701)$
Contractual Services (350,176)$ (357,180)$ (364,323)$ (371,610)$ (379,042)$
Utilities (29,050)$ (29,631)$ (30,224)$ (30,828)$ (31,445)$
Repairs and Maintenance (457,050)$ (466,191)$ (475,515)$ (485,025)$ (494,726)$ Total (2,991,835)$ (3,051,672)$ (3,112,705)$ (3,174,959)$ (3,238,458)$
FY 2028 FY 2029FY 2027ExpenditureFY 2025 FY 2026
DRAFT
CAMPO 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program 10
Financial Constraint
To exhibit financial constraint, a financial plan should address three questions:
1) What will the needs for transportation in the CAMPO planning area cost?
The needs are identified by project in the following section and costs are summarized by funding source in
Figure 2.
2) What revenues are available that can be applied to the needs?
Specific revenues available to meet the needs are identified in the Demonstration of Fiscal Constraint tables
- Forecast Revenue for Transportation projects, Operations and Maintenance, by jurisdiction and source.
3) Are the revenues sufficient to cover the costs?
As shown in Figure 2 – Programmed by Source, programmed fund amounts equal available fund amounts.
For many jurisdictions as shown in Figure 2, available funds exceed the amounts of revenues required to
fund programmed projects.
DRAFT
CAMPO 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program 11
Demonstration of Fiscal Constraint – Municipalities
Source 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Total
CART 2,195,639$ 2,239,552$ 2,284,343$ 2,330,030$ 2,376,630$ 11,426,193$ General Revenue (excluding CART)10,960,048$ 11,179,249$ 11,402,834$ 11,630,891$ 11,863,508$ 57,036,530$ Total Available Revenue 13,155,687$ 13,418,801$ 13,687,177$ 13,960,920$ 14,240,139$ 68,462,723$
Operation & Maintenance Costs (70,909)$ (71,973)$ (73,052)$ (74,148)$ (75,260)$ (365,342)$
TIP Commitment Totals -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Total Costs (70,909)$ (71,973)$ (73,052)$ (74,148)$ (75,260)$ (365,342)$
Remaining Financial Capacity 13,084,778$ 13,346,828$ 13,614,124$ 13,886,772$ 14,164,878$ 68,097,381$
Source 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 TotalCART1,514,193$ 1,544,477$ 1,575,367$ 1,606,874$ 1,639,012$ 7,879,924$ General Revenue (excluding CART)39,987,106$ 40,786,848$ 41,602,585$ 42,434,637$ 43,283,330$ 208,094,506$ Total Available Revenue 41,501,299$ 42,331,325$ 43,177,952$ 44,041,511$ 44,922,341$ 215,974,429$
Operation & Maintenance Costs (197,370)$ (200,331)$ (203,336)$ (206,386)$ (209,481)$ (1,016,903)$
TIP Commitment Totals (5,438)$ (102,863)$ -$ -$ -$ (108,301)$ Total Costs (202,808)$ (303,194)$ (203,336)$ (206,386)$ (209,481)$ (1,125,204)$ Remaining Financial Capacity 41,298,491$ 42,028,132$ 42,974,616$ 43,835,125$ 44,712,860$ 214,849,225$
Source 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 TotalCART204,623$ 208,715$ 212,889$ 217,147$ 221,490$ 1,064,864$ General Revenue (excluding CART)1,635,970$ 1,668,689$ 1,702,063$ 1,736,104$ 1,770,827$ 8,513,654$ Total Available Revenue 1,840,593$ 1,877,404$ 1,914,953$ 1,953,252$ 1,992,317$ 9,578,518$
Operation & Maintenance Costs (68,660)$ (69,690)$ (70,735)$ (71,796)$ (72,873)$ (353,755)$
TIP Commitment Totals (62,500)$ -$ -$ -$ -$ (62,500)$ Total Costs (131,160)$ (69,690)$ (70,735)$ (71,796)$ (72,873)$ (416,255)$ Remaining Financial Capacity 1,709,433$ 1,807,715$ 1,844,217$ 1,881,455$ 1,919,443$ 9,162,263$
Source 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 TotalCART2,239,335$ 2,284,122$ 2,329,804$ 2,376,400$ 2,423,928$ 11,653,588$ General Revenue (excluding CART)37,516,952$ 38,267,291$ 39,032,637$ 39,813,290$ 40,609,556$ 195,239,726$ Total Available Revenue 39,756,287$ 40,551,413$ 41,362,441$ 42,189,690$ 43,033,484$ 206,893,314$
Operation & Maintenance Costs (1,035,789)$ (1,051,326)$ (1,067,096)$ (1,083,102)$ (1,099,349)$ (5,336,661)$ TIP Commitment Totals (1,554,120)$ (1,106,836)$ (1,162,178)$ (1,220,287)$ (1,281,301)$ (6,324,722)$ Total Costs (2,589,909)$ (2,158,162)$ (2,229,274)$ (2,303,389)$ (2,380,650)$ (11,661,383)$ Remaining Financial Capacity 37,166,378$ 38,393,251$ 39,133,167$ 39,886,301$ 40,652,834$ 195,231,931$
Costs
Callaway County Demonstration of Fiscal Constraint
Revenue
Costs
Cole County Demonstration of Fiscal Constraint
Revenue
Costs
Holts Summit Demonstration of Fiscal Constraint
Revenue
Costs
City of Jefferson Demonstration of Fiscal ConstraintRevenue
Source 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 TotalCART60,455$ 61,664$ 62,897$ 64,155$ 65,438$ 314,608$
General Revenue 1,154,645$ 1,177,738$ 1,201,293$ 1,225,319$ 1,249,825$ 6,008,819$ Total Available Revenue 1,215,100$ 1,239,402$ 1,264,190$ 1,289,473$ 1,315,263$ 6,323,427$
Operation & Maintenance Costs (31,371)$ (31,842)$ (32,319)$ (32,804)$ (33,296)$ (161,632)$ TIP Commitment Totals (127,078)$ -$ -$ -$ -$ (127,078)$ Total Costs (158,449)$ (31,842)$ (32,319)$ (32,804)$ (33,296)$ (288,710)$ Remaining Financial Capacity 1,056,651$ 1,207,560$ 1,231,870$ 1,256,669$ 1,281,967$ 6,034,717$
Source 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Total
CART 52,471$ 53,520$ 54,591$ 55,682$ 56,796$ 273,060$ General Revenue (excluding CART)270,085$ 275,487$ 280,996$ 286,616$ 292,349$ 1,405,533$ Total Available Revenue 322,556$ 329,007$ 335,587$ 342,299$ 349,145$ 1,678,593$
Operation & Maintenance Costs -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
TIP Commitment Totals -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Total Costs -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Remaining Financial Capacity 322,556$ 329,007$ 335,587$ 342,299$ 349,145$ 1,678,593$
St. Martins Demonstration of Fiscal ConstraintRevenue
Costs
Taos Demonstration of Fiscal ConstraintRevenue
Costs
DRAFT
CAMPO 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program 12
Demonstration of Fiscal Constraint – Public Transportation Providers
Source 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Total
CART 80,514$ 82,125$ 83,767$ 85,443$ 87,151$ 419,001$ General Revenue 277,000$ 282,540$ 288,191$ 293,955$ 299,834$ 1,441,519$ Total Available Revenue 357,514$ 364,665$ 371,958$ 379,397$ 386,985$ 1,860,520$
Operation & Maintenance Costs -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ TIP Commitment Totals (105,909)$ -$ -$ -$ -$ (105,909)$ Total Costs (105,909)$ -$ -$ -$ -$ (105,909)$ Remaining Financial Capacity 251,605$ 364,665$ 371,958$ 379,397$ 386,985$ 1,754,611$
Costs
Wardsville Demonstration of Fiscal ConstraintRevenue
Source 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Total
CARES Act Funds (Distributed as FTA 5307)207,170$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ FTA Section 5307 (not including CARES)1,070,655$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
FTA Section 5307 Sub-Total 2,331,188$ 1,106,836$ 1,162,178$ 1,220,287$ 1,281,301$ 7,101,790$
FTA Section 5310 112,000$ 112,000$ 112,000$ 112,000$ 112,000$ 560,000$
FTA Section 5339 954,953$ 10,175$ -$ -$ -$ 965,128$
Sales Tax - 1/2% Capital Improvement 80,000$ 80,000$ 80,000$ 80,000$ 80,000$ 400,000$ City of Jefferson-Local Operating Assistance 1,035,000$ 1,705,000$ 1,739,100$ 1,773,882$ 1,809,360$ 8,062,342$ MoDOT State Operating Assistance 68,000$ 68,000$ 68,000$ 68,000$ 68,000$ 340,000$
Farebox and Reimbursements 391,692$ 399,526$ 407,516$ 415,667$ 423,980$ 2,038,381$ Total Available Revenue 4,972,833$ 3,481,537$ 3,568,794$ 3,669,836$ 3,774,641$ 19,467,641$
Personnel Services (1,820,479)$ (1,856,889)$ (1,894,026)$ (1,931,907)$ (1,970,545)$ (9,473,846)$ Materials and Supplies (335,080)$ (341,782)$ (348,617)$ (355,590)$ (362,701)$ (1,743,770)$ Contractual Services (350,176)$ (357,180)$ (364,323)$ (371,610)$ (379,042)$ (1,822,330)$
Utilities (29,050)$ (29,631)$ (30,224)$ (30,828)$ (31,445)$ (151,177)$ Repairs and Maintenance (457,050)$ (466,191)$ (475,515)$ (485,025)$ (494,726)$ (2,378,507)$ Operation & Maintenance Totals (2,991,835)$ (3,051,672)$ (3,112,705)$ (3,174,959)$ (3,238,458)$ (15,569,629)$
TIP CommitmentsTIP Commitment Totals (311,100)$ (30,544)$ (28,000)$ (28,000)$ (28,000)$ (425,644)$ Remaining Financial Capacity 1,669,898$ 399,321$ 428,089$ 466,876$ 508,182$ 3,472,367$
Operation & Maintenance
JEFFTRAN Demonstration of Fiscal Constraint
Revenue
Source 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 TotalFTA Section 5310 60,000$ 158,000$ 70,000$ 158,000$ 70,000$ 516,000$
Farebox and Reimbursements 4,500$ 5,250$ 5,250$ 5,250$ 5,250$ 25,500$ Local Contracts 55,500$ 64,750$ 64,750$ 64,750$ 64,750$ 314,500$ Total Available Revenue 120,000$ 228,000$ 140,000$ 228,000$ 140,000$ 856,000$
Personnel Services (51,500)$ (59,000)$ (59,000)$ (59,000)$ (59,000)$ (287,500)$ Materials and Supplies (2,500)$ (4,000)$ (4,000)$ (4,000)$ (4,000)$ (18,500)$
Repairs and Maintenance (6,000)$ (7,000)$ (7,000)$ (7,000)$ (7,000)$ (34,000)$ Operation & Maintenance Totals (60,000)$ (70,000)$ (70,000)$ (70,000)$ (70,000)$ (340,000)$
TIP CommitmentsTIP Commitment Totals (60,000)$ (92,000)$ (70,000)$ (92,000)$ (70,000)$ (384,000)$ Remaining Financial Capacity -$ 66,000$ -$ 66,000$ -$ 132,000$
OATS Demonstration of Fiscal Constraint
Revenue
Operation & Maintenance
DRAFT
CAMPO 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program 13
Fiscally Constrained Transportation Projects – Bridges
MoDOT Funding State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Source Category 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Future Totals
Project FHWA NHPP $42,400 $339,200 $381,600
MoDOT STATE $10,600 $84,800 $95,400
TIP #2022-07 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3523 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA NHPP $1,403,200 $1,403,200
MoDOT STATE $350,800 $350,800
Local $0
Other $0
Total Project Cost: $2,231,000 Total $53,000 $2,178,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,231,000
Bridge Improvement on Rte. 50 over
Vetter Lane & Bolivar. E
N
G
Prior Funding
Description & Location: Bridge improvement
over Vetter Lane. Includes Bolivar Street over
Rte. 50.
R
O
W
C
O
NS
T
Comments: Bridge A1420 and twin bridges
A0722.
MoDOT Funding State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Source Category 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Future Totals
Project FHWA NHPP $89,600 $490,400 $580,000
MoDOT STATE $22,400 $122,600 $145,000
TIP #2022-10 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3525 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA NHPP $2,105,600 $2,105,600
MoDOT STATE $526,400 $526,400
Local $0
Other $0
Total Project Cost: $3,357,000 Total $112,000 $3,245,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,357,000
MoDOT Funding State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Source Category 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Future Totals
Project FHWA NHPP $104,000 $428,000 $532,000
MoDOT STATE $26,000 $107,000 $133,000
TIP #2022-11 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3560 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA NHPP $1,780,800 $1,780,800
MoDOT STATE $445,200 $445,200
Local $0
Other $0
Total Project Cost: $2,891,000 Total $130,000 $2,761,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,891,000
R
OW
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Bridge K0760.
Description & Location: Bridge improvement
over Bus. 50, Linden Drive, Moreau Overflow,
and Stadium Boulevard. Includes Madison
Street Ramp over Rte. 54.
R
O
W
CO
NS
T
Comments: Bridges A1415, A1309 and twin
bridges A1305, A1307 and A1672.
Prior
Funding
Bridge Improvements On US 54
over Bus. 50 and others. E
NG
Prior
Funding
Bridge Improvement On US 54 over
Neighorn Branch E
N
G
Description & Location: Bridge improvement
over Neighorn Branch.
DRAFT
CAMPO 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program 14
MoDOT Funding State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Source Category 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Future Totals
Project FHWA NHPP $800 $14,400 $21,600 $161,600 $198,400
MoDOT STATE $200 $3,600 $5,400 $40,400 $49,600
TIP #2023-01 Local $0
MoDOT#CD0072 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA NHPP $743,200 $743,200
MoDOT STATE $185,800 $185,800
Local $0
Other $0
Total Project Cost: $1,177,000 Total $1,000 $18,000 $27,000 $1,131,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,177,000
MoDOT Funding State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Source Category 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Future Totals
Project FHWA AC-STBG $800 $20,000 $20,800
MoDOT STATE $200 $5,000 $5,200
TIP #2023-03 Local $0
MoDOT#CD0075 FHWA $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA AC-STBG $152,800 $152,800
MoDOT STATE $38,200 $38,200
Local $0
MoDOT $0
Total Project Cost: $217,000 Total $1,000 $216,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $217,000
MoDOT Funding State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Source Category 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Future Totals
Project FHWA NHPP $800 $800 $800 $13,600 $161,600 $161,600 $339,200
MoDOT STATE $200 $200 $200 $3,400 $40,400 $40,400 $84,800
TIP #2024-01 Local $0
MoDOT#CD0140 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA NHPP $539,200 $539,200 $1,078,400
MoDOT STATE $134,800 $134,800 $269,600
Local $0
Other $0
Total Project Cost: $1,772,000 Total $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $17,000 $876,000 $876,000 $0 $1,772,000
Prior
Funding
Bridge improvements On US 50
over Osage River. EN
G
Description & Location: Bridge removal on tri-
level over US 50.R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Bridge A1418.
Description & Location: Bridge improvements
over Osage River. Project involves bridges
A5552 and A0506.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Bridges A5552 and A0506
Prior
Funding
Bridge Improvement On S. Summit
Drive over Rte. 54 E
N
G
Prior
Funding
Bridge (Overpass) Removal on Tri-
Level over US 50 EN
G
Description & Location: Bridge improvement
over Rte. 54. R
OW
CO
NS
T
Comments: Bridge A3521.
DRAFT
CAMPO 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program 15
MoDOT Funding State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Source Category 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Future Totals
Project FHWA NHPP $1,600 $14,400 $116,000 $921,600 $1,053,600
MoDOT STATE $400 $3,600 $29,000 $230,400 $263,400
TIP #2024-02 Local $0
MoDOT#CD0139 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA NHPP $3,327,200 $3,327,200
MoDOT STATE $831,800 $831,800
Local $0
Other $0
Total Project Cost: $5,476,000 Total $2,000 $18,000 $145,000 $5,311,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,476,000
MoDOT Funding State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Source Category 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Future Totals
Project FHWA NHPP $11,200 $143,200 $154,400
MoDOT STATE $2,800 $35,800 $38,600
TIP #2024-03 Local $0
MoDOT#CD0157 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA NHPP $546,400 $546,400
MoDOT STATE $136,600 $136,600
Local $0
Other $0
Total Project Cost: $876,000 Total $14,000 $862,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $876,000
Cole Funding State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Source Category 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Future Totals
Project FHWA BRO $83,336 $83,336
MoDOT BFP $51,226 $51,226
TIP #2024-04 Local Cole County $5,438 $5,438
MoDOT#BRO-R026(25)Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA BRO $1,576,241 $1,576,241
MoDOT BFP $968,897 $968,897
Local Cole County $102,863 $102,863
Other $0
Total Project Cost: $2,788,001 Total $140,000 $2,648,001 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,788,001
Description & Location: Replacement of bridge
on Tanner Bridge Road over the Moreau River.
Bridge #0780025
R
O
W
C
O
N
ST
Comments:
Prior Funding
Bridge Improvement On US 54 over
Neighorn Branch E
N
G
Description & Location: Bridge improvements
over Missouri River. Project involves bridge
A4497.
R
OW
CO
NS
T
Comments: Bridges A4497
Prior Funding
Tanner Bridge Road bridge
replacement over Moreau River E
N
G
Description & Location: Bridge improvement
over Neighorn Branch.R
O
W
C
ON
ST
Comments: Bridge G0302.
Prior
Funding
Bridge improvements On US 54/63
over Missouri River. E
N
G
DRAFT
CAMPO 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program 16
Fiscally Constrained Transportation Projects - Roadways
MoDOT Funding State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Source Category 2025 2026 2027 2028 2028 Future Totals
Project FHWA AC-STBG $68,000 $80,000 $187,200 $335,200
MoDOT STATE $17,000 $20,000 $46,800 $83,800
TIP #2020-12 MoDOT $0
MoDOT#5S3418 Other $0
FHWA AC-STBG $86,400 $86,400
MoDOT STATE $21,600 $21,600
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA AC-STBG $910,400 $910,400
MoDOT STATE $227,600 $227,600
Local $0
Other $0
Total Project Cost: $1,665,000 Total $85,000 $208,000 $1,372,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,665,000
Prior
Funding
Intersection Improvements at South
Ten Mile Drive in Jefferson City. E
N
G
Description & Location: Intersection
improvements at South Ten Mile Drive (South
Outer Road 50) in Jefferson City.
R
OW
C
O
N
S
T
Comments:
MoDOT Funding State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Source Category 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Future Totals
Project FHWA AC-STBG $800 $135,200 $136,000
MoDOT STATE $200 $33,800 $34,000
TIP #2022-23 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3487 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA AC-STBG $1,977,600 $1,977,600
MoDOT STATE $494,400 $494,400
Local $0
Other $0
Total Project Cost: $2,642,000 Total $1,000 $2,641,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,642,000
MoDOT Funding State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Source Category 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Future Totals
Project FHWA AC-STBG $800 $800 $800 $146,400 $148,800
MoDOT STATE $200 $200 $200 $36,600 $37,200
TIP #2023-04 Local $0
MoDOT#CD0004 FHWA $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA AC-STBG $2,272,800 $2,272,800
MoDOT STATE $568,200 $568,200
Local $0
FHWA $0
Total Project Cost: $3,027,000 Total $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $3,024,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,027,000
Description & Location: Job Order Contracting
for guard cable and guardrail repair on various
routes in the northern portion of the Central
District.
R
O
W
C
ON
ST
Comments:
Prior Funding
Guard Cable & Guardrail Repair in
Northern Central District E
N
G
Prior Funding
Guard Cable & Guardrail Repair in
Northern Central District E
N
G
Description & Location: Job Order Contracting
for guard cable and guardrail repair on various
routes in the northern portion of the Central
District.
R
O
W
C
ON
ST
Comments:
DRAFT
CAMPO 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program 17
MoDOT Funding State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Source Category 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Future Totals
Project FHWA NHPP $1,529,600 $1,529,600
MoDOT STATE $382,400 $382,400
TIP #2023-05 Local $0
MoDOT#CD0100 FHWA $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA NHPP $17,708,000 $17,708,000
MoDOT STATE $4,427,000 $4,427,000
Local $0
FHWA $0
Total Project Cost: $24,047,000 Total #########$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,047,000
MoDOT Funding State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Source Category 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Future Totals
Project FHWA NHPP $800 $800 $26,400 $257,600 $285,600
MoDOT STATE $200 $200 $6,600 $64,400 $71,400
TIP #2023-06 Local $0
MoDOT#CD0106 FHWA $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
FHWA $0
FHWA NHPP $3,277,600 $3,277,600
MoDOT STATE $819,400 $819,400
Local $0
FHWA $0
Total Project Cost: $4,454,000 Total $1,000 $1,000 $33,000 $4,419,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,454,000
MoDOT Funding State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Source Category 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Future Totals
Project FHWA AC-STBG $800 $12,000 $12,800
MoDOT STATE $200 $3,000 $3,200
TIP #2023-08 Local $0
MoDOT#CD0040 FHWA $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA AC-STBG $196,800 $196,800
MoDOT STATE $49,200 $49,200
Local $0
FHWA $0
Total Project Cost: $262,000 Total $1,000 $261,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $262,000
Prior
Funding
Pavement Improvement on RT E
from US 54 to RT B E
N
G
Description & Location: Pavement improvement from west of Shamrock Road to east of Stoney Gap Road. Includes westbound Rte. 50 from
west of Maries River to east of Mari Osa Delta
Lane and from west of Osage River to Moreau
River.
R
OW
C
O
N
S
T
Comments:
Description & Location: Pavement
improvement on RT E from US 54 to RT B.RO
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments:
Prior
Funding
Pavement Resurfacing on US 54 E
N
G
Prior
Funding
Pavement Improvement on US 50 E
N
G
Description & Location: Pavement resurfacing
from County Road 147 north of Kingdom City
to Missouri River bridge. Includes high friction
surface treatment.
R
OW
CO
NS
T
Comments:
DRAFT
CAMPO 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program 18
MoDOT Funding State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Source Category 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Future Totals
Project FHWA AC-STBG $5,600 $65,600 $71,200
MoDOT STATE $1,400 $16,400 $17,800
TIP #2023-09 Local $0
MoDOT#CD0043 FHWA $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA AC-STBG $1,109,600 $1,109,600
MoDOT STATE $277,400 $277,400
Local $0
Other $0
Total Project Cost: $1,476,000 Total $7,000 $1,469,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,476,000
MoDOT Funding State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Source Category 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Future Totals
Project FHWA NHPP $4,000 $4,000 $169,600 $177,600
MoDOT STATE $1,000 $1,000 $42,400 $44,400
TIP #2024-14 Local $0
MoDOT#CD0170 FHWA $0
FHWA NHPP $800 $800
MoDOT STATE $200 $200
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA NHPP $2,192,800 $2,192,800
MoDOT STATE $548,200 $548,200
Local $0
Other $0
Total Project Cost: $2,964,000 Total $5,000 $6,000 $2,953,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,964,000
Prior
Funding
Callaway Rte 54 E
NG
Description & Location: Pavement improvement
on RT H from RT E to end of state
maintenance; RT BB from MO 17 to RT. H; and
RT CC from RT C to US 54.
R
OW
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: This project includes three routes
(H, BB, and CC).
Description & Location: Add lanes north of the
Missouri River Bridge in Jefferson City.
Includes modifying interchange configuration
at Rte. W and Rte. 54.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: This project was split from
5P3497. (TIP#2022-01)
Prior
Funding
Pavement Improvement on Routes
H, BB, and CC. E
N
G
DRAFT
CAMPO 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program 19
Fiscally Constrained Transportation Projects - Other
MoDOT Funding State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Source Category 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Future Totals
Project FHWA SAFETY $800 $800
MoDOT STATE $200 $200
TIP #2023-11 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3521 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA SAFETY $50,400 $50,400
MoDOT STATE $12,600 $12,600
Local $0
Other $0
Total Project Cost: $64,000 Total $0 $64,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $64,000
MoDOT Funding State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Source Category 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Future Totals
Project FHWA SAFETY $800 $800
MoDOT STATE $200 $200
TIP #2023-12 Local $0
MoDOT#CD0006 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA SAFETY $50,400 $50,400
MoDOT STATE $12,600 $12,600
Local $0
Other $0
Total Project Cost: $64,000 Total $0 $0 $64,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $64,000
MoDOT Funding State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Source Category 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Future Totals
Project FHWA SAFETY $800 $800
MoDOT STATE $200 $200
TIP #2024-05 Local $0
MoDOT#CD0141 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA SAFETY $50,400 $50,400
MoDOT STATE $12,600 $12,600
Local $0
Other $0
Total Project Cost: $64,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $64,000 $0 $0 $0 $64,000
Description & Location: On-call work zone
enforcement at various locations in the Central
District.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments:
Prior
Funding
On-Call Work Zone Enforcement EN
G
Description & Location: On-call work zone
enforcement at various locations in the Central
District.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments:
Prior
Funding
On-Call Work Zone Enforcement EN
G
Description & Location: On-call work zone
enforcement at various locations in the Central
District.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments:
Prior
Funding
On-Call Work Zone Enforcement EN
G
DRAFT
CAMPO 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program 20
MoDOT Funding State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Source Category 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Future Totals
Project FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
TIP #2024-06 Local $0
MoDOT#5B0800T Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT STATE $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA NHPP $0
MoDOT STATE $4,399,000 $4,399,000 $4,399,000 $4,399,000 $4,399,000 $4,399,000 $26,394,000
Local $0
Other $0
Total Project Cost: $26,394,000 Total $4,399,000 $4,399,000 $4,399,000 $4,399,000 $4,399,000 $4,399,000 $0 $26,394,000
Prior
Funding
Payback for Safe and Sound
bridges in the Central District. E
NG
Description & Location: Payback beginning in
SFY 2008 for Safe and Sound bridges in the
Central District.
R
O
W
C
ON
ST
Comments:
DRAFT
CAMPO 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program 21
Fiscally Constrained Transportation Projects – Scoping and Design Projects
MoDOT Funding State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Source Category 2025 2026 2027 2028 2028 Future Totals
Project FHWA AC-STBG $800 $2,400 $3,200
MoDOT STATE $200 $600 $800
TIP #2013-16 Local $0
MoDOT#5S2234 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
Total Project Cost: $4,000 Total $1,000 $3,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,000
MoDOT Funding State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Source Category 2025 2026 2027 2028 2028 Future Totals
Project FHWA NHPP $40,000 $40,000
MoDOT STATE $10,000 $10,000
TIP #2022-27 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3588 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
Total Project Cost: $50,000 Total $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000
MoDOT Funding State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Source Category 2025 2026 2027 2028 2028 Future Totals
Project FHWA NHPP $800 $1,600 $2,400
MoDOT STATE $200 $400 $600
TIP #2024-07 Local $0
MoDOT#CD0159 Other $0
FHWA NHPP $0
MoDOT STATE $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA NHPP $0
MoDOT STATE $0
Local $0
Other $0
Total Project Cost: $3,000 Total $1,000 $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,000
Description & Location: Scoping for bridge
improvements over Rte. 50. RO
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Project involves bridge A1187
Prior
Funding
Scoping for Interchange
Improvements at Truman Blvd and
Country Club Drive E
N
G
Description & Location: Scoping for
intersection improvements at Routes M and
Route W in Wardsville.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments:
Prior Funding
Dix Road - Scoping for bridge
improvements over US 50. E
N
G
Description & Location: Scoping for
Interchange Improvements at Truman Blvd and
Country Club Drive.
RO
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments:
Prior
Funding
Scoping Routes M, B, & W EN
G
DRAFT
CAMPO 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program 22
MoDOT Funding State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Source Category 2025 2026 2027 2028 2028 Future Totals
Project FHWA $0
MoDOT STATE $50,000 $100,000 $150,000
TIP #2024-08 Local $0
MoDOT#5S3592 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT STATE $0
Local $0
Other $0
Total Project Cost: $150,000 Total $50,000 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000
MoDOT Funding State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Source Category 2025 2026 2027 2028 2028 Future Totals
Project FHWA $0
MoDOT STATE $1,000 $2,000 $3,000
TIP #2024-09 Local $0
MoDOT#5P3402 Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT STATE $0
Local $0
Other $0
Total Project Cost: $3,000 Total $1,000 $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,000
MoDOT Funding State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Source Category 2025 2026 2027 2028 2028 Future Totals
Project FHWA AC-STBG $800 $1,600 $2,400
MoDOT STATE $200 $400 $600
TIP #2024-10 Local $0
MoDOT#CD0052 Other $0
FHWA AC-STBG $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA AC-STBG $0
MoDOT STATE $0
Local $0
Other $0
Total Project Cost: $3,000 Total $1,000 $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,000
Prior
Funding
VARIOUS - Scoping for curve
chevron and object markers. E
N
G
Description & Location: Surveying to sell
excess right-of-way parcels in the Central
District.
R
O
W
CO
NS
T
Comments:
Description & Location: Scoping for curve
chevron and object marker installation at
vrious locations in the Central District.
R
O
W
CO
NS
T
Comments:
Prior
Funding
VARIOUS - Scoping for future
projects in the Central District. E
N
G
Prior
Funding
VARIOUS - Surveying to sell
excess right-of-way. E
N
G
Description & Location: Scoping for future
projects on various routes in the Central
District.
R
OW
CO
NS
T
Comments:
DRAFT
CAMPO 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program 23
MoDOT Funding State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Source Category 2025 2026 2027 2028 2028 Future Totals
Project FHWA AC-STBG $40,000 $800 $40,800
MoDOT STATE $10,000 $200 $10,200
TIP #2024-11 Local $0
MoDOT#CD0065 Other $0
FHWA AC-STBG $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA AC-STBG $0
MoDOT STATE $0
Local $0
Other $0
Total Project Cost: $51,000 Total $50,000 $1,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $51,000
MoDOT Funding State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Source Category 2025 2026 2027 2028 2028 Future Totals
Project FHWA AC-STBG $80,000 $320,000 $400,000
MoDOT STATE $20,000 $80,000 $100,000
TIP #2024-12 Local $0
MoDOT#CD0168 Other $0
FHWA AC-STBG $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA AC-STBG $0
MoDOT STATE $0
Local $0
Other $0
Total Project Cost: $500,000 Total $100,000 $400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000
Prior
Funding
Scoping for bridge improvements at
the Tri-level. E
NG
Description & Location: Traffic safety studies
at vairous locations in Central District.R
OW
C
O
N
S
T
Comments:
Description & Location: Scoping for bridge
improvements at intersection of Rte. 50, Rte.
63, and Rte. 54 in Jefferson City.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: Bridges A1419, A4826, A4827 and
A4828.
Prior
Funding
VARIOUS - Traffic safety studies
at vairous locations in Central E
N
G
DRAFT
CAMPO 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program 24
Fiscally Constrained Transportation Projects - Pedestrian & Bicycle Projects
Funding State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Source Category 2025 2026 2027 2028 2028 Future Totals
Project FHWA AC-STBG $800 $320,000 $320,800
MoDOT STATE $200 $80,000 $80,200
TIP #2020-16 Local $0
MoDOT#CD0126 Other $0
FHWA AC-STBG $38,400 $38,400
MoDOT STATE $9,600 $9,600
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA AC-STBG $1,000,000 $1,000,000
MoDOT STATE $250,000 $250,000
Local $0
Other $0
Total Project Cost: $1,699,000 Total $49,000 $1,650,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,699,000
Funding State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Source Category 2025 2026 2027 2028 2028 Future Totals
Project FHWA RTP $17,350 $17,350
MoDOT $0
TIP #2023-14 Local St. Martins $27,650 $27,650
MoDOT#Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA RTP $128,850 $128,850
MoDOT $0
Local St. Martins $44,111 $44,111
Other Donation $574 $574
Total Project Cost: $218,535 Total $218,535 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $218,535
Prior
Funding
St. Martins Trail E
N
G
Description & Location: Upgrade pedestrian
facilities to comply with the ADA Transition
Plan in Jefferson City, Taos, Wardsville, and
Frankenstein.
R
O
W
C
O
NS
T
Comments:
Description & Location: Recreational Trails
Grant, 7' ADA trail extension from Niekamp
Park to Traci Dr.
R
O
W
CO
NS
T
Comments: Recreational Trail Program Grant
awarded November 2022.
St. Martins
Prior
Funding
Updating Pedestrian Facilities EN
G
MoDOT
Funding State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Source Category 2025 2026 2027 2028 2028 Future Totals
Project FHWA TAP $79,500 $79,500
MoDOT $0
TIP #2023-17 Local Holts Summit $62,500 $62,500
MoDOT#Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA TAP $420,500 $420,500
MoDOT $0
Local Holts Summit $62,500 $62,500
Other $0
Total Project Cost: $625,000 Total $625,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $625,000
Prior
Funding
Holts Summit Sidewalk construction
along S. Summit Drive E
N
G
Description & Location: Transportation
Alternatives Program Grant, Sidewalk
installation along S. Summit Drive from Holt
Lane to Ellsworth Drive.
R
OW
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: TAP
Holts Summit
DRAFT
CAMPO 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program 25
Funding State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Source Category 2025 2026 2027 2028 2028 Future Totals
Project FHWA TAP $0
MoDOT $0
TIP #2023-15 Local City of Jefferson $0
MoDOT#Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA TAP $222,744 $222,744
MoDOT $0
Local City of Jefferso $55,686 $55,686
Other $0
Total Project Cost: $278,430 Total $278,430 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $278,430
Funding State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Source Category 2025 2026 2027 2028 2028 Future Totals
Project FHWA TAP $0
MoDOT $0
TIP #2023-16 Local City of Jefferson $0
MoDOT#Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA TAP $500,000 $500,000
MoDOT $0
Local City of Jefferson $483,465 $483,465
Other $0
Total Project Cost: $983,465 Total $0 $983,465 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $983,465
Funding State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Source Category 2025 2026 2027 2028 2028 Future Totals
Project FHWA TAP $361,874 $361,874
MoDOT $0
TIP #2024-13 Local Wardsville $98,526 $98,526
MoDOT#Other $0
FHWA $0
MoDOT $0
Local $0
Other $0
FHWA TAP $27,117 $27,117
MoDOT $0
Local Wardsville $7,383 $7,383
Other $0
Total Project Cost: $494,900 Total $494,900 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $494,900
City of Jefferson
Wardsville
Description & Location: Construction of
approximately 1400 feet of 8ft wide sidewalks
along Falcon Lane to accommodate
pedestrians and bicycle users.
R
O
W
CO
NS
T
Comments: TAP 2022 Supplemental Award
Prior
Funding
Wears Creek Greenway Extension
Bypassing MO 179 E
N
G
Description & Location: Transportation
Alternatives Program Grant, includes
improvements to greenway crosswalks.
R
OW
CO
NS
T
Comments: TAP
Prior
Funding
Falcon Lane Pedestrian
Improvements E
N
G
Description & Location: Transportation
Alternatives Program Grant, includes
extension of the Wears Creek Greenway
along Tree Valley Lane, bypassing MO 179.
R
O
W
CO
NS
T
Comments: TAP
Prior
Funding
Greenway crosswalks at
Southwest Blvd and Lafayette St. E
N
G
City of Jefferson
DRAFT
CAMPO 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program 26
Funding State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Source Category 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Future Totals
Project FHWA TAP $41,609 $41,609
MoDOT $0
TIP #2025-XX Local Cole County $18,391 $18,391
MoDOT#Other $0
FHWA TAP $0
MoDOT $0
Local Cole County $0
Other $0
FHWA TAP $458,391 $458,391
MoDOT $0
Local Cole County $202,609 $202,609
Other $0
Total Project Cost: $721,000 Total $0 $721,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $721,000
Funding State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Source Category 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Future Totals
Project FHWA TAP $0
MoDOT $0
TIP #2025-XX Local City of Jefferson $0
MoDOT#Other $0
FHWA TAP $0
MoDOT $0
Local City of Jefferson $0
Other $0
FHWA TAP $500,000 $500,000
MoDOT $0
Local City of Jefferson $495,703 $495,703
Other $0
Total Project Cost: $995,703 Total $0 $0 $0 $995,703 $0 $0 $0 $995,703
Funding State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Source Category 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Future Totals
Project FHWA TAP $0
MoDOT $0
TIP #2025-XX Local City of Jefferson $0
MoDOT#Other $0
FHWA TAP $0
MoDOT $0
Local City of Jefferson $0
Other $0
FHWA TAP $169,762 $169,762
MoDOT $0
Local City of Jefferson $42,441 $42,441
Other $0
Total Project Cost: $212,203 Total $0 $212,203 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $212,203
Cole County
City of Jefferson
City of Jefferson Prior
Funding
South Country Club Sidewalk E
NG
Description & Location: Multi-Use trails
construction from McCarty St.. to Riverside
park in the Boggs Creek watershed.
RO
W
C
ON
S
T
Comments: TAP 2023 Award
Description & Location:Construction of
Sidepath along S. Country Club Drive from 200
feet NE of Tanman Ct. to Farigrounds Rd.
R
O
W
C
O
N
S
T
Comments: TAP 2023 Award
Prior
Funding
Rainbow Dr. Sidewalk E
N
G
Prior
Funding
Boggs Creek Multi-Use Trail E
N
G
Description & Location: Sidewalk construction
along Rainbow Dr. from Hunters Run to Terra
Bella Dr.
R
OW
CO
NS
T
Comments: TAP 2023 Award
DRAFT
CAMPO 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program 27
Fiscally Constrained Transportation Projects – Public Transportation Projects
Funding State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Source Category 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Future Totals
Project JEFFTRAN Operating Assistance Other Pass. Fares $521,590 $391,692 $468,886 $478,264 $487,829 $497,585 $2,845,846
MoDOT State Operatin $11,500 $52,414 $52,414 $52,414 $52,414 $52,414 $273,570
TIP #2011-04 Local City of Jefferso $821,916 $1,070,655 $1,106,836 $1,162,178 $1,220,287 $1,281,301 $6,663,173
MoDOT#FTA 5307 $821,916 $1,070,655 $1,106,836 $1,162,178 $1,220,287 $1,281,301 $6,663,173
Total Project Cost: $16,445,762 Total $2,176,922 $2,585,416 $2,734,972 $2,855,034 $2,980,817 $3,112,601 $0 $16,445,762
Funding State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Source Category 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Future Totals
Project JEFFTRAN Operating Assistance Other $0
MoDOT $0
TIP #2022-21 Local General Fund $28,000 $28,000 $28,000 $28,000 $28,000 $28,000 $168,000
MoDOT#FTA 5310 $112,000 $112,000 $112,000 $112,000 $112,000 $112,000 $672,000
Total Project Cost: $840,000 Total $140,000 $140,000 $140,000 $140,000 $140,000 $140,000 $0 $840,000
Description & Location: Operating Assistance
for JEFFTRAN service within Jefferson City
limits (A 3% annual inflation factor applied.)
Comments:
Prior
Funding
Description & Location: Section 5310 Grant
Program for acquiring new paratransit buses.
Providing mobility needs for seniors and
persons with disabilities.
Comments:
Prior
Funding
O
P
E
R
O
P
E
R
City of Jefferson - JEFFTRAN
City of Jefferson - JEFFTRAN
Funding State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Source Category 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Future Totals
Project Other Pass. Fares $0
MoDOT State Operating $0
TIP #2020-22 Local General Fund $8,000 $2,544 $10,544
MoDOT#FTA 5339 $32,000 $10,175 $42,175
Total Project Cost: $52,719 Total $0 $40,000 $12,719 $0 $0 $0 $0 $52,719
Description & Location: This project would
replace outdated security cameras and entry
systems in transit facilities. Jefferson City,
MO. And add solar lighting to select bus
shelters.
Comments:
Prior
Funding
Replace Security Systems in Transit
Facilities O
PE
R
City of Jefferson - JEFFTRAN
DRAFT
CAMPO 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program 28
Funding State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Source Category 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Future Totals
Project Other Pass. Fares $0
MoDOT State Operating $0
TIP #2022-24 Local General Fund $57,600 $57,600
MoDOT#FTA 5339 $230,400 $230,400
Total Project Cost: $288,000 Total $0 $288,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $288,000
Funding State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Source Category 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Future Totals
Project Other Pass. Fares $0
MoDOT State Operating $0
TIP #2022-26 Local General Fund $7,000 $7,000
MoDOT#FTA 5339 $28,000 $28,000
Total Project Cost: $35,000 Total $0 $35,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $35,000
Description & Location: This project would
purchase 2 replacement low-floor buses.
Comments:
Prior
Funding
Replacement of Two Low-Floor
Buses O
PE
R
Description & Location: This project would
repair the bus barn roof, which is leaking.
Comments:
Prior
Funding
Repair Bus Barn Roof O
PE
R
City of Jefferson - JEFFTRAN
City of Jefferson - JEFFTRAN
Funding State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Source Category 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Future Totals
Project FTA $0
MoDOT $0
TIP #2022-31 Local General Fund $60,000 $60,000
MoDOT#FTA 5339 $240,000 $240,000
Total Project Cost: $300,000 Total $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000
Description & Location: Replacement of AVL
and related equipment and supporting
services.
Comments:
Prior
Funding
AVL/AVA/APC/Infotainment
Replacement Equipment and O
P
E
R
City of Jefferson - JEFFTRAN
DRAFT
CAMPO 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program 29
Funding State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Source Category 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Future Totals
Project OATS Operating Assistance FTA 5310 $88,000 $88,000 $88,000 $264,000
MoDOT $0
TIP #2018-10 Local $0
MoDOT#Other OATS $22,000 $22,000 $22,000 $66,000
Total Project Cost: $330,000 Total $0 $0 $110,000 $0 $110,000 $0 $110,000 $330,000
Funding State Program Year - July 1 to June 30
Source Category 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Future Totals
Project OATS Operating Assistance FTA 5310 $60,000 $70,000 $70,000 $70,000 $70,000 $340,000
MoDOT $0
TIP #2018-11 Local $0
MoDOT#Other OATS $60,000 $70,000 $70,000 $70,000 $70,000 $340,000
Total Project Cost: $680,000 Total $0 $120,000 $140,000 $140,000 $140,000 $140,000 $0 $680,000
Description & Location: Within the Jefferson
City MPO Region-Section 5310-Seniors and
Individuals w ith Disabilities.
Comments: Other Funding - OATS, Inc.
Prior Funding
O
P
E
R
Description & Location: Requesting
replacement/expansion vehicles to provide
service in Jefferson City and surrounding
Comments: Other Funding - OATS, Inc.
Prior
Funding
O
PE
R
OATS
OATS
DRAFT
CAMPO 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program 30
Project Locations - Figure 7 - Map of Fiscally Constrained Transportation Projects
CAMPO 2025-2029
Transportation Improvement Program
July 1, 2024 – June 30, 2029
DRAFT
CAMPO 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program 31
Program of Projects
Figure 8 – JEFFTRAN Program of Projects
No.Description Est. Total
Funding by
Others Local
1 Replace paratransit widebody cutaway buses 600,000$ $ 480,000 120,000$
2 Upgrade/replace fare card system 150,000$ $ 120,000 30,000$
3 Transit facility repairs & improvements 50,000$ 40,000$ 10,000$
4 Security upgrades for transit facilities 30,000$ $ 24,000 6,000$
5 Upgrade transit transfer facilities 150,000$ $ 120,000 30,000$
6 Purchase and install bus shelters and amenities at various locations in Jefferson City 30,000$ 24,000$ 6,000$
7 Purchase back-up generator & switches for transit and CM facilities 250,000$ 200,000$ 50,000$
8 Replace low-floor route buses 8,000,000$ $ 6,400,000 1,600,000$
9 Construct replacement transit/central maintenace/bus barn/bus wash facilities 40,000,000$ 32,000,000$ 8,000,000$
10 Transit admin facility rehab 75,000$ $ 60,000 15,000$
11 Purchase and install additional transit traveler kiosks (each)15,000$ 12,000$ 3,000$
12 Add bike racks/benches at passenger transfer facilities and selected bus stops 25,000$ $ 20,000 5,000$
13 Charging systems/electrical upgrades for buses 600,000$ 480,000$ 120,000$
14 Add crosswalks and supporting bike/ped amenities to transit bus shelters 60,000$ $ 48,000 12,000$
15 Add solar lighting/occupancy indicators for selected bus shelters 35,000$ 28,000$ 7,000$
16 Replace mobile column lifts for buses 100,000$ $ 80,000 20,000$
17 Add vehicle electric charging stations and associated infrastructure 50,000$ 40,000$ 10,000$
18 Time-tracking software for transit employees 15,000$ $ 12,000 3,000$
19 Passenger Engagement/Bus infotainment system, including digital displays 250,000$ 200,000$ 50,000$
20 Pre-trip inspection software 30,000$ $ 24,000 6,000$
21 Purchase and install heating system for bus wash building 35,000$ 28,000$ 7,000$
22 Purchase and install vehicle operations monitoring system 332,000$ $ 265,600 66,400$
Total 50,882,000$ 40,705,600$ 10,176,400$
JEFFTRAN 2025 Program of Projects
Illustrative Projects
DRAFT
CAMPO 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program 32
Multimodal Projects
In 2015, CAMPO met with federal and state planning partners in a formal planning process review. Within
two recommendations made, CAMPO was urged to include more multi-modal projects into the TIP. CAMPO
staff sent out written requests and reminders at CAMPO meetings for projects, including those not using
federal dollars. As of the writing of this document, no projects have been submitted.
However, there are a number of factors why these projects are limited. These types of projects are usually
incorporated into new road projects. Many of these types of projects are highly dependent on grants, which
may or may not be annually awarded. Projects are usually decided each budget year. There are several
bicycle or pedestrian projects in the MTP illustrative list, but projects are not constrained and funds are not
obligated.
Regionally Significant Projects
A regionally significant project means a transportation project (other than projects that may be grouped in
the TIP and/or STIP or exempt projects as defined in EPA’s transportation conformity regulation (40 CFR
part 93) that is on a facility which serves regional transportation needs (such as access to and from the area
outside the region; major activity centers in the region; major planned developments such as new retail malls,
sports complexes, or employment centers; or transportation terminals) and would normally be included in the
modeling of the metropolitan area’s transportation network. At a minimum, this includes all principal arterial
highways and all fixed guideway transit facilities that offer a significant alternative to regional highway
travel.
The TIP does not currently contain a project that meets this criteria.
DRAFT
CAMPO 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program 33
Appendix 1 – Amendments and Administrative Modifications
Amendments
TIP No. Project Description Project
Sponsor Project Cost Board
Approval
OneDOT
Approval
Administrative Modifications
TIP No. Description of Modification Date
DRAFT
CAMPO 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program 34
Appendix 2 – Federal Funding Sources
On November 15, 2021, President Biden signed the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA), also known as the
“Bipartisan Infrastructure Law”) into law. The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) provides $550 billion over fiscal
years 2022 through 2026 in new Federal investment in infrastructure, including in roads, bridges, and mass transit,
water infrastructure, resilience, and broadband.
As under the FAST Act, the BIL authorizes a single, combined amount for each fiscal year for all apportioned highway
programs combined. That amount is first apportioned among the States, and then each State’s apportionment is
divided among the individual apportioned programs.
The BIL also appropriates funding from the General Fund for three other formula-based programs separate and apart
from the apportioned amount described above (and the formula described below): (1) the Bridge Formula Program,
(2) the National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Formula Program, and (3) the Appalachian Development Highway
System Program.
Federal-aid Highway Apportioned Programs
The BIL authorizes a total combined amount ($52.5 B for fiscal year (FY) 2022, $53.5 B for FY23, $54.6 B for FY24,
$55.7 B for FY25, and $56.8 B for FY26) in Contract Authority from the Highway Account of the Highway Trust Fund
to fund 8 highway apportioned programs (including certain set-asides):
• National Highway Performance Program (NHPP)
• Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBG)
• Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
• Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ)
• National Highway Freight Program (NHFP)
• Metropolitan Planning (PL)
• Carbon Reduction Program (CRP) NEW
• Promoting Resilient Operations for Transformative, Efficient, and Cost-saving Transportation (PROTECT) Formula Program NEW
More information can be found at: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bipartisan-infrastructure-law/funding.cfm
Federal Transit Administration Funding
The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law authorizes up to $108 billion to support federal public transportation programs,
including $91 billion in guaranteed funding. More information can be found at:
https://www.transit.dot.gov/funding/grants/grant-programs
FTA Programs Eligible Activities
Section 5307 Urbanized Area Formula Grants This program provides grants to Urbanized Areas (UZA) for public transportation capital, planning, job access and reverse commute projects, as well as operating expenses in certain circumstances. Section 5310 Enhanced Mobility
of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities
This program is intended to enhance mobility for seniors and persons with
disabilities by providing funds for programs to serve the special needs of transit-dependent populations beyond traditional public transportation services and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) complementary paratransit services. Section 5311 Formula Grants for Rural Areas
This program provides capital, planning, and operating assistance to states to support public transportation in rural areas with populations less than 50,000, where many residents often rely on public transit to reach their destinations.
Section 5329 Transit Safety & Oversight
This section requires FTA to implement and maintain a national public transportation safety program to improve the safety of all public transportation systems that receive federal funding. The safety program includes a national public transportation safety plan, a safety certification training program, a public transportation agency safety plan, and a state safety oversight program.
Section 5339 Bus and Bus Facilities Provides capital funding to replace, rehabilitate and purchase buses and related equipment and to construct bus-related facilities.
DRAFT
CAMPO 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program 35
Appendix 3 – Policies and Procedures
Amendments
An amendment involves a major change to a project and requires approval by the Board of Directors and
Governor. An amendment is a revision that requires public review, allowance of comment, possible re-
demonstration of fiscal constraint, and includes at least one of the following:
• Addition or deletion of a project using FHWA or FTA funds (except as allowed as an administrative
modification),
• Major changes affecting project cost from FHWA or FTA sources (changes exceeding 20% of FHWA
or FTA sources of the existing project cost or changes over $2,000,000),
• Major changes in a project phase initiation date (greater than 12 months), or
• Major changes in design concept or design scope, such as changing project termini (more than 1/2
mile or 10% of the total length of the project, whichever is greater) or changing the number of
through traffic lanes that also includes a substantial increase in Federal cost.
Amendments will be initiated by the project sponsor. Amendments to delete a project can simply be made
via written correspondence identifying the project and why it is to be removed from the TIP. Amendments
to include a new project can be made on the TIP Project Form for the current TIP with a cover letter or remark
in the comment section requesting inclusion in the TIP as an amendment. Amendments for existing projects
can be made on the TIP Project Form for the current TIP with a cover letter or remark in the comment section
highlighting the change in the project and providing the CAMPO TIP Number.
After an Amendment has been requested the process as follows:
• Staff will review the amendment for accuracy and to verify if an amendment is required or if the
change qualifies as an administrative modification. Staff may consult with MoDOT and FHWA if
necessary.
• The amendment will be placed on the next Technical Committee (TC) meeting agenda for review.
• The Technical Committee is an advisory board to the board of directors. Regardless of whether the
Technical Committee recommends approval of a project, does not recommend approval of a project,
or is unable to make a recommendation, the project shall still proceed to the Board of Directors to
make a final decision.
• If approval is recommended by the TC to the Board of Directors, staff will post the amendment
notice on the website, initiating a minimum 7 calendar day public comment period, send notices to
the appropriate parties, and place the amendment on the next Board of Directors meeting agenda.
• At the Board of Directors Meeting, they will close the public comment period and a vote for approval
will be held.
If the project sponsor indicates an emergency situation upon submitting the amendment, staff will:
• Initiate the public comment period
• Post the amendment notice on the website, initiating the 7-calendar-day public comment period
• Send notices to the appropriate parties
• Place the amendment on the next Board of Directors meeting agenda.
The Board will close the public comment period at the next Board of Directors Meeting and hold a vote for
approval. If this is not adequate to meet the emergency situation, a special Board of Directors meeting may
be called and proceed as outlined in the Public Participation Plan.
DRAFT
CAMPO 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program 36
Administrative Modifications
Revisions to the TIP and TIP projects that do not meet the criteria of an Amendment will be considered
administrative modifications including: minor changes to project/project phase costs, minor changes to
funding sources of previously-included projects, and minor changes to project/project phase initiation dates.
An administrative modification is a revision that neither requires committee action, public review and
comment, nor redemonstrates fiscal constraint.
An administrative modification will be initiated by the project sponsor by written communication to CAMPO
staff describing the change (phase cost, funding sources, or phase initiation date) warranting the
modification. Staff will review the administrative modification for accuracy and to verify qualification as an
administrative modification. Staff may consult with MoDOT and FHWA if necessary.
Upon CAMPO staff confirmation of the administrative modification requirements being met, staff will modify
the TIP appropriately, including noting the administrative modification in Appendix 1 of the TIP and making
changes to the project listing in the body of the TIP; notify the Board of Directors, Technical Committee,
MoDOT, FTA, and FHWA via email; draft a staff memo for the next Board of Directors and Technical
Committee meeting; and post the modified TIP notice on the CAMPO website for a minimum of 7 calendar
days.
Combining or Splitting Projects
Splitting a project into two or more projects or combining two or more projects can provide benefits to
project scheduling, cost, and logistics. A split or combination can be made via an administrative modification
to the TIP, if the project does not trigger a major change to the project as described in the amendment
section and the overall scope of work does not change.
When combining two or more projects, the financial and description information will be rolled up into the
project which was in the TIP originally and use the previous MPO TIP number. When splitting a project into
two or more projects, the financial and descriptive information will be separated appropriately into several
(two or more) projects using the same MPO TIP number, but the additional projects will include alphabetic
suffixes. The process for splitting or combining projects will follow the procedures of either an amendment
or administrative modification.
Compliance with Metropolitan Transportation Plan
For a project to be eligible for the TIP, it first must be included in the adopted MTP. Large capital projects,
roadway capacity, and/or general purpose roadway projects must be individually listed or clearly part of
a larger project included in the fiscally‐constrained component of the plan. Certain projects seeking to
improve safety, increase multi‐modal opportunities, or enhance the existing transportation system may be
programmed in the TIP without individual identification in the regional plan, so long as they are consistent
with the established goals and objectives of the plan.
Project Delay Policy
The goal of the Project Delay Policy for the Transportation Improvement Program is to maximize the federal
funding obligated each fiscal year and to enable the MPO to redirect funds to different projects if any are
inactive or otherwise limited from making progress. The Delay Policy applies to projects funded through the
programs for which CAMPO has oversight of project selection.
The intent of the Delay Policy is to provide an incentive for local agency sponsors to develop their projects
according to a detailed schedule and, thereby, to obligate the federal funds assigned to each project within
DRAFT
CAMPO 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program 37
the timeframes initially shown in the TIP. The Delay Policy is primarily focused on projects that involve
construction or provide transportation improvements that are handled through purchasing procedures.
In the context of this Delay Policy, a “delay” occurs when a construction-related project phase does not get
advertised within six months of the TIP program year in which its construction phase funding was originally
programmed, or changed with an amendment, in the TIP. For non-construction projects and programs, a
“delay” occurs when the “Notice to Proceed” is not issued within two months of the TIP program year in which
its implementation was originally funded in the TIP. The consequence of a delay may be the withdrawal of
its Federal funds from the TIP or other action by the Board.
Project Funding Information
When a new project is submitted for inclusion to the TIP, either during the initial development of the TIP or
as an amendment, the project sponsor is required to provide information regarding the local funding sources
in order to show fiscal constraint. The specific source of revenue, anticipated future, and any other financial
information needed to show fiscal constraint will be required.
Project Selection
The CAMPO Board of Directors adopted (Resolution 2010-04) a project prioritization and selection process.
This process involves a call for projects, ranking based on CAMPO priorities by staff and reviewed by the
CAMPO Technical Committee, prior to being forwarded to the CAMPO Board of Directors for a vote of
approval. The Board of Directors may modify the project selection if deemed necessary.
Project Sponsor Commitment to Projects
Project sponsors hold ultimate responsibility for ensuring that project information contained in the TIP is
correct, that it accurately represents the scope of work being performed, and that the amount of funding
being requested is correct. The sponsor is responsible for providing CAMPO with an honest accounting of
project details including: costs, implementation schedules, and local matching fund sources, at the time of the
application for federal funds and anytime such details change. The project sponsor is also responsible for
reviewing the TIP after a project is included or modified to ensure correctness.
Scriveners’ Error
Errors made in the ministerial functions of creating and maintaining the TIP, such as cartography,
typographical, spelling, minor word omissions, mathematical, and other error’s which do not alter the intent
of the TIP and have little or no impact can be performed by staff and shall not be considered a revision to
the TIP.
DRAFT
CAMPO 2025-2029 Transportation Improvement Program 38
Appendix 4 – Definitions
Attainment area means any geographic area in which levels of a given criteria air pollutant (e.g., ozone, carbon monoxide, PM10, PM2.5, and
nitrogen dioxide) meet the health-based National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for that pollutant. An area may be an attainment area for one pollutant and a nonattainment area for others. A maintenance area (see
definition below) is not considered an attainment area for transportation planning purposes. Available funds means funds derived from an existing source dedicated to or historically used for transportation purposes. For Federal funds, authorized
and/or appropriated funds and the extrapolation of formula and discretionary funds at historic rates of increase are considered available. A similar approach may be used for State and local funds that are dedicated to
or historically used for transportation purposes. Conformity means a Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7506(c)) requirement that ensures that Federal funding and approval are given to transportation plans, programs and projects that are consistent with the air quality goals established
by a State Implementation Plan (SIP). Conformity, to the purpose of the SIP, means that transportation activities will not cause new air quality violations, worsen existing violations, or delay timely attainment of the NAAQS. The
transportation conformity rule (40 CFR part 93) sets forth policy, criteria, and procedures for demonstrating and assuring conformity of transportation activities. Cooperation means that the parties involved in carrying out the transportation
planning and programming processes work together to achieve a common goal or objective. Coordination means the cooperative development of plans, programs, and
schedules among agencies and entities with legal standing and adjustment of such plans, programs, and schedules to achieve general consistency, as appropriate. Design concept means the type of facility identified for a transportation
improvement project (e.g., freeway, expressway, arterial highway, grade separated highway, toll road, reserved right-of-way rail transit, mixed-traffic rail transit, or busway).
Design scope means the aspects that will affect the proposed facility’s impact on the region, usually as they relate to vehicle or person carrying capacity and control (e.g., number of lanes or tracks to be constructed or added, length of
project, signalization, safety features, access control including approximate
number and location of interchanges, or preferential treatment for high occupancy vehicles). Financial Plan means documentation required to be included with a
metropolitan transportation plan and TIP (and optional for the long-range statewide transportation plan and STIP) that demonstrates the consistency between reasonably available and projected sources of Federal, State, local,
and private revenues and the costs of implementing proposed transportation
system improvements. Financially Constrained or Fiscal Constraint means that the metropolitan transportation plan, TIP, and STIP includes sufficient financial information for
demonstrating that projects in the metropolitan transportation plan, TIP, and STIP can be implemented using committed, available, or reasonably available revenue sources, with reasonable assurance that the federally supported transportation system is being adequately operated and maintained. For the
TIP and the STIP, financial constraint/fiscal constraint applies to each program year. Additionally, projects in air quality nonattainment and maintenance areas can be included in the first two years of the TIP and STIP only if funds
are available or committed. Illustrative Project means an additional transportation project that may (but is not required to) be included in a financial plan for a metropolitan transportation plan, TIP, or STIP if reasonable additional resources were to
become available. Maintenance Area means any geographic region of the United States that the EPA previously designated as a nonattainment area for one or more pollutants
pursuant to the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, and subsequently redesignated as an attainment area subject to the requirement to develop a maintenance plan under section 175A of the Clean Air Act, as amended. Major Projects - These transportation improvements are defined as projects
receiving Federal financial assistance 1) with an estimated total cost of $500
million or more or 2) that have been identified by the FHWA as being a Major Project. The designated projects may include those: 1) that require a
substantial amount of a State Transportation Agency's program resources, 2) that have a high level of public or congressional attention, or 3) that have extraordinary implications for the national transportation system. Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA) means the geographic area determined
by agreement between the metropolitan planning organization (MPO) for the area and the Governor, in which the metropolitan transportation planning process is carried out.
Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) means the official multimodal
transportation plan addressing no less than a 20-year planning horizon that is developed, adopted, and updated by CAMPO through the metropolitan transportation planning process.
Nonattainment area means any geographic region of the United States that has been designated by the EPA as a nonattainment area under section 107 of the Clean Air Act for any pollutants for which an NAAQS exists.
Obligated projects means strategies and projects funded under title 23 U.S.C.
and title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53 for which the supporting Federal funds were authorized and committed by the State or designated recipient in the preceding program year, and authorized by the FHWA or awarded as a
grant by the FTA. Program of Projects (POP) is a list of projects to be funded in a grant application submitted to FTA by a designated recipient. The POP lists the subrecipients and indicates whether they are private non-profit agencies,
governmental authorities, or private providers of transportation service, designates the areas served (including rural areas), and identifies any tribal entities. In addition, the POP includes a brief description of the projects, total
project cost, and Federal share for each project. Project selection means the procedures followed by MPOs, States, and public transportation operators to advance projects from the first four years of an
approved TIP and/or STIP to implementation, in accordance with agreed upon
procedures. Project sponsor must be a city, county, state, or other transportation related government agency eligible to receive federal funding from the Federal
Highway or Federal Transit Administrations. All other entities must partner with a city, county, or state agency to apply for and/or administer a transportation project.
Public transportation operator means the public entity which participates in
the continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive transportation planning process in accordance with 23 U.S.C. 134 and 135 and 49 U.S.C. 5303 and 5304, and is the designated recipient of Federal funds under title 49 U.S.C. Chapter
53 for transportation by a conveyance that provides regular and continuing general or special transportation to the public, but does not include school bus, charter, or intercity bus transportation or intercity passenger rail transportation
provided by Amtrak. Regionally significant project means a transportation project (other than projects that may be grouped in the TIP and/or STIP or exempt projects as defined in EPA’s transportation conformity regulation (40 CFR part 93)) that is
on a facility which serves regional transportation needs (such as access to and from the area outside the region; major activity centers in the region; major planned developments such as new retail malls, sports complexes, or
employment centers; or transportation terminals) and would normally be included in the modeling of the metropolitan area’s transportation network. At a minimum, this includes all principal arterial highways and all fixed guideway transit facilities that offer a significant alternative to regional highway travel.
Statewide transportation improvement program (STIP) means a statewide prioritized listing/program of transportation projects covering a period of four years that is consistent with the long-range statewide transportation plan,
metropolitan transportation plans, and TIPs, and required for projects to be
eligible for funding under title 23 U.S.C. and title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53. Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a document prepared by a metropolitan planning organization that lists projects to be funded with
FHWA/FTA funds for the at least next one- to three-year period. Unified Planning Work Plan (UPWP) is the management plan for the (metropolitan) planning program. Its purpose is to coordinate the planning
activities of all participants in the planning process.
Agenda Item 7C
CAMPO Technical Committee Staff Report FY 2025 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) March 7, 2024
Summary
Staff has begun work on the FY 2025 UPWP. This annual process starts very early due to the City of Jefferson’s budget process. The FY 2025 UPWP is anticipated to be adopted by May 2024.
The UPWP is CAMPO’s annual statement of work identifying the budget, planning priorities, and activities to be carried out for the year (November 1 to October 31). The UPWP contains many ongoing activities required to perform
the essential functions of CAMPO, as well as, periodic and/or one-time activities. The UPWP serves as the basis for funding agreements with the Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) and stands as the divisional budget within the City of Jefferson’s annual budget.
Staff is requesting the Technical Committee please review the objectives and activities outlined in the attached draft document and provide comments. Input from the Technical Committee, Board of Directors, stakeholders, and the general public will be used throughout the process. These activities are categorized into six work elements:
• Work Element 521 - Program Support & Administration
• Work Element 522 - General Development and Comprehensive Planning Coordination
• Work Element 524 - Short Range Transportation Planning & Programming
• Work Element 525 - Long Range Transportation Planning
• Work Element 526 - Public Transportation Planning
• Work Element 527 – Safe/Accessible Transportation Planning (No local match required. This causes overall local match requirements to fall slightly less than 20%.) Previous Year (FY 2024) - Major tasks (to be) completed:
• Annual update of Unified Planning Work Program and the Transportation Improvement Program.
• Review of Urbanized Area/Planning Area boundary.
• Review of Federal Functional Classification of Urban Area roads.
• Staff assistance in planning the 2024 Missouri Active Transportation Summit.
• Completion of various reports:
o System Performance, Disadvantaged Business (DBE), Title VI, Annual Listing Obligated Projects (ALOP).
• Update of the CAMPO 2045 & Beyond Metropolitan Transportation Plan.
• Completion of Capital Area Active Transportation Plan (formerly Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan).
• Update of regional databases, including; sidewalks, greenway, bike trails/lanes and local roads.
• Various ongoing technical assistance projects for member jurisdictions: o GIS, grants, research, etc. FY 2025 - Anticipated major activities in, developed thus far:
• Development of the FY 2026 UPWP (Annual)
• Development of the 2026-2030 Transportation Improvement Program (Annual)
• Various Reports: System Performance, DBE, Title VI, ALOP. (Annual)
• Update of Coordinated Public Transit – Humans Services Transportation Plan (4-5 years)
• Technical assistance (i.e. mapping, data development/management, grants) (Continuous)
• Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) Grant Program -application for planning funds
• Study of US 54/63/50 Tri-Level Interchange.
The estimated draft budget for FY 2025 is approximately $482,933 with $386,993 (~80%) funded through the Consolidated Planning Grant (CPG) and $95,940 (~20%) funded through local match. The 20% local match is
provided by Jefferson City (15%) and Cole County (5%). It is projected that CAMPO will have a balance of approximately $341,429 in unprogrammed CPG funds at the end of FY 2025, ased on the anticipated FY 2024 expenditure and estimated FY 2025 draft budget. Tri-level Study is excluded from the FY 2024 expenditure, and included in the FY 2025 expenditure. The project is anticipated to begin in FY 2024, but most of the expenditure will likely occur in FY 2025. It is anticipated to cost up to $500,000,
Agenda Item 7C
with $200,000 in Consolidated Planning Grant funds being utilized and local funds for the remainder. Local match is split between Jefferson City (50%) and Cole County (50%). The following chart details the estimated trajectory
of the CAMPO CPG balance. All totals are subject to change during the development of the UPWP.
A draft FY 2025 UPWP is attached.
Please refer questions or comments to Katrina Williams at 573-634-6536 or at kawilliams@jeffersoncitymo.gov.
CPG Balance for end of FY2023 $552,333
FY 2024 CPG Allocation*$172,841
FY 2024 UPWP CPG Expenditure - Anticipated (excludes Tri-Level Study)**-($169,636)
CPG Balance for end of FY2024 - Anticipated* Subtotal $555,538$0FY 2025 CPG Allocation - Estimated per MoDOT's FY24 SPR Work Program $172,884
FY 2025 CPG Programmed Expenditure - Anticipated (Including 100% of Tri-Level Study)**-($386,993)
FY 2025 END OF YEAR Remaining Unprogrammed CPG Funds Anticipated $341,429
Consolidated Planning Grant Balance
Unified
Planning
Work
Program
The preparation of this report was financed in part by the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, and Federal Transit Administration in cooperation with the Missouri Department of Transportation. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this report are not necessarily those of the Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Administration, or the Missouri Department of Transportation.
FY 2025
November 1, 2024 to October 31, 2025
Pending Adoption - May 15, 2024
Administration of the Capital Area MPO is provided by the City of Jefferson
Department of Planning and Protective Services
Room 120 John G. Christy Municipal Building
320 East McCarty St., Jefferson City, Missouri 65101
Phone: (573) 634-6410 http://www.jeffersoncitymo.gov/campo
DRAFT
Table of Contents
Introduction......................................................................................................................................................... 1
Major Tasks Completed in FY 2024 .......................................................................................................................... 1
Tasks Carried Over from FY 2024 ............................................................................................................................ 1
Priorities for FY 2025 ...................................................................................................................................... 1
UPWP Development ......................................................................................................................................... 2
UPWP Modification and Amendment Process ............................................................................................. 2
Public Participation ........................................................................................................................................... 2
Air Quality Planning ......................................................................................................................................... 3
Safe and Accessible Transportation Planning ............................................................................................. 3
Financial Support for CAMPO ....................................................................................................................... 3
Transportation Planning Factors ..................................................................................................................... 4
Required Documents Timeline ......................................................................................................................... 5
Work Element 521 - Program Support & Administration ......................................................................... 6
Work Element 522 - General Development & Comprehensive Planning Coordination ..................... 7
Work Element 524 - Short Range Transportation Planning & Programming ....................................... 8
Work Element 525 - Long Range Transportation Planning ...................................................................... 9
Work Element 526 - Public Transportation Planning ............................................................................... 10
Work Element 527 - Safe and Accessible Transportation Planning ..................................................... 11
Appendix A – Financial Summary ............................................................................................................... 12
Anticipated Expenditures & Revenue ...................................................................................................................... 12
Table 1: FY 2025 CAMPO Budget* ...................................................................................................................... 12
Table 2: FY 2025 Work Element Funding Summary - Consolidated Planning Grant and Local Funds ... 13
Table 4: Anticipated Available Federal Consolidated Planning Grant (CPG) Balance Revenue ............ 13
Appendix B – CAMPO Boundary Map ...................................................................................................... 14
Appendix C - Modifications and Amendments ......................................................................................... 15
DRAFT
Resolution
DRAFT
Process Certification Page
DRAFT
Certification of Restrictions of Lobbying Page
DRAFT
FTA/FHWA Approval
DRAFT
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization
Board of Directors
Chair – Jeff Hoelscher, Eastern District Commissioner, Cole County
Vice-Chair – Scott Spencer, City Council Member, City of Jefferson City of Jefferson Jack Deeken, City Council Member
Jon Hensley, City Council Member
Jeff Ahlers, City Council Member Clint Smith, AICP, Director, Planning & Protective Services Gerry Stegeman, Transit Manager
Matt Morasch, PE, Director, Public Works
Cole County
Eric Landwehr, PE, Director, Public Works Doug Reece, City Administrator, St. Martins Callaway County
Roger Fischer, Western District Commissioner
Holts Summit Brandon Ruediger, City Administrator, City of Holts Summit
Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT)
Machelle Watkins, PE, District Engineer Ex-Officio Members Luke Holtschnieder, Jefferson City Regional Economic Partnership
Eva Steinman, Federal Transit Administration, Region VII
Christy Evers, MoDOT Transit Administrator
Vacant, Missouri Office of Administration Michael Henderson, AICP, MoDOT, Transportation Planning Dan Weitkamp, Federal Highway Administration, Missouri Div.
Tamara Tateosian, Callaway County Economic Development
Technical Committee
Chair – David Bange, PE, City Engineer, Public Works, City of Jefferson
Vice-Chair – Matt Prenger, PE, County Engineer, Public Works, Cole County
City of Jefferson Clint Smith, AICP, Director, Planning & Protective Services
Aaron Grefrath, Director, Parks, Recreation & Forestry
Matt Morasch, PE, Director of Public Works
Gerry Stegeman, Interim Transit Manager Eric Barron, AICP, Transportation Planner Britt Smith, PE, Operations & Maintenance
Cole County
Matt Prenger, PE, County Engineer
Shannon Kliethermes, Senior Planner Callaway County Howard Thomas, PE, County Highway Administrator
Small City Representative - Callaway
Mark Tate, Streets Department, City of Holts Summit
Small City Representative - Cole Rachel Busche, Wardsville
Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT)
Steve Engelbrecht, PE, District Planning Manager
Michael Henderson, AICP, Transportation Planning Specialist Daniel Roeger, PE, Area Engineer Private Transportation Interest
Vacant
Pedestrian or Biking Interest
Kevin Schwartz, JC Parks Outdoor Recreation Program Manager Ex-Officio Members: Daniel Nguyen, Federal Transit Administration, Region VII
Daniel Weitkamp, Federal Highway Administration, Missouri Div.
Jason Branstetter, Heartland Port Authority Representative - February 2024 CAMPO Staff and FTE (Full-Time Employee) apportionment
Clint Smith, AICP– Director, Planning & Protective Services FTE – 0*
Eric Barron, AICP - Planning Manager FTE - 0.3
Katrina Williams, GISP, AICP –Planner, Senior FTE – 1
Vacant – Planner I FTE – 1**
Kortney Bliss – Planner I FTE – 0**
Tiphanie Pearson – Administrative Assistant FTE - .10
* The MPO Executive Director is also the Director of the Jefferson City Department of Planning and Protective Services. This full-
time position is not funded by the MPO and does not appear in the CAMPO Budget. MPO activities are only a portion of the
Director’s job duties.
**The Planner I position may work on MPO and/or City of Jefferson planning activities depending on work flow. Both Planner I
salaries are the same and CAMPO will not seek reimbursement for more than the equivalent of one full-time Planner I.
DRAFT
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY 2025 UPWP 1
Introduction
The Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO) is responsible for long-range transportation
planning for the defined Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA), which includes the Jefferson City urbanized area.
Planning activities are carried out in a continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive manner. The Fiscal Year 2024
Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) defines tasks and anticipates funding requirements for the metropolitan
planning activities performed by CAMPO with federal funds provided by the Federal Highway Administration
(FHWA) and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) under title 23 U.S.C. and title 49 U.S.C. Chapter 53.
CAMPO staff, unless otherwise identified, performs all work. The UPWP defines activities for all public officials
and agencies that contribute resources to the transportation planning process. The UPWP covers one fiscal year,
November 1 to October 31. The UPWP outlines activities funded through the Consolidated Planning Grant (CPG)
and local funds, and serves as the basis for funding agreements with the Missouri Department of Transportation
(MoDOT). The UPWP also serves as a management tool for scheduling, budgeting, and monitoring the local
planning activities.
The current MPA boundary was approved by the CAMPO Board of Directors January 17th, 2024 and approved
by the Governor January 31, 2024 (see Appendix B). The MPA includes the jurisdictions of Holts Summit,
Jefferson City, St. Martins, Taos, Wardsville, and portions of unincorporated, non-urbanized areas within Cole
and Callaway Counties.
The CAMPO Board of Directors is composed of elected and appointed officials from local jurisdictions, selected
state agencies, and Federal transportation representatives serving as ex-officio members. The CAMPO Technical
Committee consists of representatives from member jurisdictions’ professional staff and acts in an advisory
capacity to the Board of Directors. A memorandum of understanding between members identifies the City of
Jefferson as the administrator of CAMPO, and as such, the City provides staffing. For FY 2025, the City of
Jefferson will provide staff consisting of a full-time Planner, full-time Senior Planner, and part time support from
the Director of Planning and Protective Services, a Planning Manager, and an Administrative Assistant.
Major Tasks Completed in FY 2024
• Annual update of the Unified Planning Work Program and the Transportation Improvement Program.
• Review of Urbanized Area/Planning Area boundary.
• Review of Federal Functional Classification of Urban Area roads.
• Staff assistance in planning the 2024 Missouri Active Transportation Summit.
• Completion of various reports: o System Performance, Disadvantaged Business, Title VI, Annual Listing Obligated Projects.
• Update of the CAMPO 2045 & Beyond Metropolitan Transportation Plan.
• Completion of Capital Area Active Transportation Plan (formerly Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan).
• Update of regional databases, including; sidewalks, greenway, bike trails/lanes and local roads.
• Various ongoing technical assistance projects for member jurisdictions: o GIS, grants, research, etc.
Tasks Carried Over from FY 2024
• Update of the Coordinated Public Transit Human Services Transportation Plan.
• Continued work on any technical assistance projects as they arise.
• Traffic Study of US 54/63/50 Tri-Level Interchange.
Priorities for FY 2025
• Completion of Coordinated Public Transit - Human Services Transportation Plan.
• Implementation of the CAMPO 2045 & Beyond Metropolitan Transportation Plan.
• Implementation of the Capital Area Active Transportation Plan.
• Provide technical assistance in mapping, data development, and land use planning to local jurisdictions.
• Continue implementation of FAST Act performance measures and targets.
• Traffic Study of US 54/63/50 Tri-Level Interchange.
• Application for Safe Streets and Roads for All (SS4A) Grant Program funds to complete a Safety Plan for
the CAMPO region.
• Update of Crash Analysis Report for the CAMPO area.
• Begin update of the Title VI Program, including the Public Participation Plan, and Language Assistance Plan.
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY 2025 UPWP 2
UPWP Development
The UPWP is developed in accordance with 23 CFR 450.308 and 23 CFR part 420. CAMPO staff reviewed
previous years’ time required for activities to determine time allocations for this UPWP. Because the MPO is
administered by the City of Jefferson, CAMPO accommodates the city’s budgeting process/schedule and
execution of the Consolidated Planning Grant (CPG) agreement and must begin the development of the UPWP
several months prior to the fiscal year for which the UPWP covers. CAMPO presents a draft UPWP to the Board
of Directors in April, prior to the beginning of the fiscal year. This early start presents difficulties in assuming
future tasks which may surface after adoption of the UPWP and in documenting activities occurring in the
previous year.
UPWP Modification and Amendment Process
Modification: A change in language or content that does not result in a budget increase. This change may
consist of a change to a work element’s objectives, activities, or products. Modifications are communicated by
staff to the Technical Committee and Board of Directors at the next regularly scheduled meeting.
Amendment: A change in language or content which results in a budget increase or major change in a work
element. An amendment is necessary if a budget increase is needed which impacts the funding reimbursement
agreed upon between the Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission and the City of Jefferson.
Amendments must be approved by the Board of Directors, FTA, and FHWA. Some modifications may also go
through an official approval by the Board of Directors as deemed appropriate by staff.
Modifications and Amendments are documented in Appendix C.
Public Participation
Federal law requires CAMPO to develop a public involvement program to involve the community early and
continuously in the transportation planning process. A proactive public program which provides information,
timely public notice, and public access to key decisions is included in the CAMPO Public Participation Plan. During
the development of the FY 2025 UPWP, the document is scheduled to be discussed at monthly Board of Directors
and Technical Committee meetings from February to May, and concludes with a public comment period. Draft
copies of the UPWP, as part of the meeting agendas and meeting minutes regarding UPWP development, are
available to view on the CAMPO website. In accordance with the CAMPO Title VI Policy, any and all documents
produced by CAMPO, may be requested in other formats by contacting CAMPO staff at City Hall or by calling
(573)634-6410.
DRAFT
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY 2025 UPWP 3
Air Quality Planning
According to 23 CFR 420.111(e), State DOTs and MPOs are also encouraged to include cost estimates for
transportation planning, research, development, and technology transfer related activities funded with other
federal, state, and/or local funds; particularly for producing the FHWA-required data specified in paragraph
(b) of §420.105, for planning for other transportation modes, and for air quality planning activities in areas
designated as non-attainment for transportation-related pollutants in their work programs. The MPOs in TMAs
must include such information in their work programs.
Federal standards have been established through extensive scientific review that set allowable concentrations
and exposure limits for certain pollutants. Air quality standards have been established for six criteria pollutants:
• ozone (or smog)
• carbon monoxide
• particulate matter
• nitrogen dioxide
• lead
• sulfur dioxide
The CAMPO Planning Area is in “attainment”. A geographic area with monitored levels that meet or do better
than the primary standard for each of these pollutants is called an attainment area; areas that do not meet the
primary standard for any one or more of these pollutants are called nonattainment areas. In Missouri, MoDOT is
responsible for implementing the conformity regulation for transportation actions in attainment and nonattainment
areas.
Safe and Accessible Transportation Planning
§ 11201; 23 U.S.C. 134 - The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) requires each MPO to use at least 2.5% of its PL
funds (and each State to use 2.5% of its State Planning and Research funding under 23 U.S.C. 505) on specified
planning activities to increase safe and accessible options for multiple travel modes for people of all ages and
abilities. [§ 11206(b)]
A State or MPO may opt out of the requirement, with the approval of the Secretary, if the State or MPO has Complete Streets standards and policies in place, and has developed an up-to-date Complete Streets prioritization plan that identifies a specific list of Complete Streets projects to improve the safety, mobility, or accessibility of a street. [§ 11206(c) and (e)]
For the purpose of this requirement, the term “Complete Streets standards or policies” means standards or
policies that ensure the safe and adequate accommodation of all users of the transportation system, including
pedestrians, bicyclists, public transportation users, children, older individuals, individuals with disabilities,
motorists, and freight vehicles. [§ 11206(a)]
CAMPO has an adopted Active Transportation Plan that incorporates Complete Streets standards and/or
policies and includes a prioritized list of projects. CAMPO adopted a Livable Streets Policy with the 2016
adoption of the Capital Area Pedestrian & Bicycle Plan. The 2024 Adoption of the Capital Area Active Plan
further emphasizes CAMPO’s continued commitment to complete streets standards and policies. The term “Livable
Streets” and “Complete Streets” are used interchangeably in CAMPO products.
Financial Support for CAMPO
CAMPO receives 80% of funding from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA) 5303 funds through the Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) via the Consolidated Planning Grant (CPG) and 20% via local funding. The 20% in local matching funds is provided by the City of Jefferson and Cole County. Of the 20% local funding, Jefferson City contributes 15% and Cole County contributes 5%.
Note: The Traffic Study for the US 54/63/50 Tri-Level Interchange deviates from the local match statement
above. The local match requirement is split between Jefferson City (10%) and Cole County (10%).
The total CAMPO budget for FY 2025 is $482,933. Appendix A provides more detailed breakdown of
financial details.
DRAFT
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY 2025 UPWP 4
Transportation Planning Factors
The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) (Public Law 117-58, also known as the “Bipartisan Infrastructure
Law”) was signed into law in 2021. The BIL maintains the ten planning factors identified in the previous
transportation bill, the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (FAST Act). These ten planning factors are
required for consideration in any MPO planning activities, including in the development of the UPWP, MTP, and
TIP. Figure 1 provides an overview of those planning factors and how they are addressed by each work element
in the UPWP. A detailed overview of each work element is provided in the following pages.
Figure 1: Planning Factors as addressed by work elements
Planning Factor
Work Program Element
Wo
r
k
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
52
1 -
Pr
o
g
r
a
m
Su
p
p
o
r
t
&
A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
Wo
r
k
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
52
2 -
Ge
n
e
r
a
l
De
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
C
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
Wo
r
k
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
52
4
-
S
h
o
r
t
R
a
n
g
e
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
&
Pr
o
g
r
a
m
m
i
n
g
Wo
r
k
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
52
5
-
Lo
n
g
Ra
n
g
e
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
Wo
r
k
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
5
26
-
Pu
b
l
i
c
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
Wo
r
k
E
l
e
m
e
n
t
5
27
–
Sa
f
e
&
Ac
c
e
s
s
i
b
l
e
Tr
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
A. Support the economic vitality of the metropolitan
area, especially by enabling global competitiveness,
productivity, and efficiency.
B. Increase the safety of the transportation system for motorized and nonmotorized users.
C. Increase the security of the transportation system for
motorized and nonmotorized users.
D. Increase the accessibility and mobility of people and
for freight.
E. Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy
conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote
consistency between transportation improvements and
State and local planned growth and economic
development patterns.
F. Enhance the integration and connectivity of the
transportation system, across and between modes, for
people and freight.
G. Promote efficient system management and operation.
H. Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system.
I. Improve the resiliency and reliability of the
transportation system and reduce or mitigate stormwater
impacts of surface transportation.
J. Enhance travel and tourism.
DRAFT
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY 2025 UPWP 5
Required Documents Timeline
Figure 2 outlines the general timeline for updating most of the federally required MPO plans and documents.
The fiscal year runs from November 1 through October 31 and quarters are as follows:
Quarter 1 – November 1 – January 31
Quarter 2 – February 1 – April 30
Quarter 3 – May 1 – July 31
Quarter 4 – August 1-October 31
Figure 2: Timeline for updating required MPO plans and documents
Fiscal
Year Qtr MTP TIP UPWP CPTHSTP Title VI LAP PPP
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
2029
2028
2024
2025
2026
2027
MTP - Metropolitan Transportation Plan Expires June 19, 2024
TIP – Transportation Improvement Program Approved in May (Expires in June)
UPWP – Unified Planning Work Program Approved in May (Expires in October)
CPTHSTP – Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan Update Required December 2024-2025
Title VI Program –Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Update Required March 2026
LAP – Language Assistance Plan Update Required March 2026
PPP – Public Participation Plan Update Required March 2026
MPA / Functional Class Review (Not shown above) Update required in 2033 (Occurs every 10 years)
DRAFT
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY 2025 UPWP 6
Work Element 521 - Program Support & Administration
This task covers the activities necessary to carry out the daily activities of CAMPO in support of the transportation
planning process. These include meeting preparation, UPWP development, public outreach activities, reporting,
and professional development activities.
Objectives / Activities
• Manage CAMPO activities in order to comply with Federal and State administrative requirements and
guidance. Support the operations of the Board of Directors and Technical Committee, communicate and
coordinate with Federal and State agencies on MPO activities, and support day-to-day operations.
• Develop the annual budget and Unified Planning Work Program along with the preparation and
submittal of UPWP quarterly progress reports, billings, and invoices. Modify UPWP as needed with
approval from the necessary authority.
• Facilitate public participation such as public meetings, hearings, and workshops, as needed, and in
accordance with the Public Participation Plan. Provide access to CAMPO activities through maintenance
and updating of the CAMPO website.
• Fulfill program update and reporting requirements related to Title VI, Public Participation Plan, Language Assistance Plan, Disadvantage Business Enterprise requirements, project obligation, and other topics as required.
• Professional Development activities, including attendance at relevant training sessions, educational
seminars, meetings, and conferences.
FY 2024 Accomplishments
• Facilitation of Board of Directors and Technical Committee monthly meetings as required.
• FY 2025 UPWP updated.
• Quarterly progress reports, billings, and invoices completed.
• Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Commitments Semi-Annual reports completed.
• Staff participated in various professional development activities, including MoDOT, FHWA, and FTA
sponsored events, webinars, and other training opportunities.
• Title VI Annual Report completed.
FY 2025 Products
• Board of Directors and Technical Committee meetings administration/facilitation support.
• Meeting agendas, minutes, presentations, reports, and other support material.
• Complete FY 2026 UPWP.
• End of year report, quarterly progress reports, billings, and invoices.
• DBE Commitments Semi-Annual reports.
• Complete Title VI Annual Report.
• Participation in professional development activities and maintain pertinent professional certifications.
• Begin review and update of Title VI Program, including Language Assistance Plan and Public
Participation Plan as federally required.
Responsible Party: CAMPO staff
Funding: This work element includes labor costs and direct costs.
Work Element Cost Type Federal CPG Funds 80% Local Match 20% Total Percent of Work Program Budget
521 Labor $28,280 $7,070 $35,350 7%
Direct $16,320 $4,080 $20,400 4%
DRAFT
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY 2025 UPWP 7
Work Element 522 - General Development & Comprehensive Planning Coordination
Not all of the CAMPO member organizations have planning staff or current comprehensive planning
documents in place. In order to facilitate transportation planning by incorporating the vision and goals
for the member organizations and the public, CAMPO will provide assistance in the crafting of the
transportation component of local comprehensive planning documents, as practical. This task may
include the development and maintenance of related spatial and non-spatial data collection and
analysis; examples include land use, demographic data, housing, human services, environmental/natural
resources, recreation/open space, and public facilities.
Objectives / Activities
• Provide technical planning assistance to CAMPO members in the development of the
transportation component of comprehensive and other planning documents, including geospatial
analytical support, local ordinances, and databases.
• Assist jurisdictions in the acquisition and use of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and other
data for use in plans, transportation grant applications, measuring performance, and forecasting
provided by the US Census, MoDOT, and others.
FY 2024 Accomplishments
• Provided technical assistance in various grant application processes in the CAMPO area.
• Provided assistance in the development of local comprehensive plans of member organizations.
• Provided geospatial analysis/data (elevations, demographic, sidewalk, bicycle facilities, street
right-of-way, etc.) to support development, and grant application activities.
FY 2025 Products
• Assist with various inputs for comprehensive planning documents - ongoing for multiple years.
• Assist with and maintain various GIS databases pertinent to transportation planning.
• Continue providing technical assistance for the transportation component of local planning
documents.
• Assist member jurisdictions with development of local ordinances that may facilitate corridor
preservation and improve efficient network connectivity.
Responsible Party: CAMPO staff and local jurisdictions. Local jurisdictions have ultimate responsibility
for the development and publishing of their planning documents.
Funding: This work element includes only labor costs.
Work Element Cost Type Federal CPG Funds 80% Local Match 20% Total Percent of Work Program Budget
522 Labor $15,352 $3,838 $19,190 4%
DRAFT
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY 2025 UPWP 8
Work Element 524 - Short Range Transportation Planning & Programming
Identify and address immediate or short-term transportation needs which may include non-motorized planning
activities, complete streets planning, freight planning, bicycle/pedestrian planning, safety planning, operations
and management planning, transportation security planning, or wayfinding activities.
Objectives / Activities
• Provide support for short-range transportation planning by CAMPO and its members.
• Participate in regional activities regarding freight, safety, security, bicycle/pedestrian, non-motorized,
and other related planning activities.
• Review and maintain the goals and strategies outlined in adopted CAMPO plans: o CAMPO 2045 & Beyond Metropolitan Transportation Plan and Major Thoroughfare Plan o Capital Area Active Transportation Plan o Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan o Public Participation Plan o Regional Wayfinding Plan
• Maintain the current TIP through the Amendment and Modifications process that meets statutory requirements, maintain fiscal constraint, and support changing priorities and project scope.
• Continue analysis of safety data to be used in the implementation of recommended improvements and
strategies as outlined in the MTP.
• Be a resource for local jurisdictions seeking to develop an ADA Transition Plan or seeking to improve
mobility and access.
• Develop and adopt the FY2025-2029 TIP.
• Develop and publish the Annual List of Obligated Projects (ALOP) for the prior year TIP.
• Pursue grant funding, as directed, to support short-term transportation needs, including: non-motorized planning activities, complete streets planning, freight planning, active transportation planning, safety planning, operations/management planning, transportation security planning, or wayfinding activities.
FY 2024 Accomplishments
• Participated in activities, meetings and conferences including Missouri Coalition for Roadway Safety
Conference, MoDOT Unfunded Needs List, and STIP project review/discussions.
• Completed Program Year 2024 – 2028 TIP and any necessary amendments.
• Developed 2025-2029 TIP.
• Provided assistance to member jurisdictions in the completion of grant applications.
• Reviewed Crash Analysis Report.
• Continued update of Capital Area Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan.
• Assisted with planning for the 2024 Missouri Active Transportation Summit in cooperation with Missouri
Bicycle and Pedestrian Federation.
FY 2025 Products
• TIP amendments and administrative modifications as necessary.
• Development of the Program Year 2026-2030 TIP.
• Review Crash Data Report.
• Provide guidance and assistance to local jurisdictions in the transportation component of their ADA Transition Plan development efforts.
• Annual List of Obligated Projects from the previous program year.
• Assist with planning and possibly hosting of Missouri Active Transportation Summit in cooperation with
Missouri Bicycle and Pedestrian Federation.
• Implement Capital Area Active Transportation Plan.
Responsible Party: CAMPO staff
Funding: This work element includes only labor costs
Work Element Cost Type
Federal
CPG Funds 80%
Local
Match 20% Total
Percent of Work
Program Budget
524 Labor $19,035 $4,759 $23,794 5%
DRAFT
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY 2025 UPWP 9
Work Element 525 - Long Range Transportation Planning
Provide for long-range transportation planning activities, studies, and plans supporting the
transportation planning process out to a minimum of 20 years, for the CAMPO metropolitan planning
area, and may include both system level planning activities and project level activities.
Objectives / Activities
• Keep the MTP current by maintaining and amending components of the plan such as major land
use changes, major road changes, process improvements, funding, or new regulations and
legislation; and review of any projects to be included into the TIP that are not already listed in
the MTP.
• Involve key stakeholders, business community and advocacy groups, environmental
organizations, and the public in long range transportation planning activities to achieve the
long-term transportation goals and vision of the MTP.
• Report MPO performance targets in relation to performance measures for the MTP and TIP.
• Implement the recommendations and strategies as identified in the MTP.
FY 2024 Accomplishments
• Staff, working with MoDOT, continued setting federal performance measures for the TIP and
MTP. Performance measures and targets are included in the System Performance Report.
• Worked with the Technical Committee and Board of Directors to implement the MTP strategies.
• Completed update of the CAMPO 2045 & Beyond Metropolitan Transportation Plan as
federally required.
• Staff continues development of GIS data and resources to assist jurisdictions with plan
development and implementation.
• Completed review of Planning Area Boundary and Federal Functional Classification.
FY 2025 Products
• Implementation of the MTP strategies and improvements.
• Assist member jurisdictions in implementing recommended improvements outlined in the MTP.
• Amendments and review of the MTP as necessary.
• Report MTP and TIP performance measures and targets.
• Annual Review of Illustrative List of Projects.
• Traffic Study of US 54/63/50 Tri-Level Interchange2.
Responsible Party: CAMPO/City of Jefferson staff and consultant.
Funding: This work element includes direct costs and labor costs.
Work Element Cost Type
Federal
CPG Funds 80%
Local
Match 20% Total
Percent of Work
Program Budget
525 Labor $62,770 $15,692 $78,462 16%
Direct2 $200,000 $50,000 $250,000 52%
2 The project is anticipated to cost up to $500,000, with only $200,000 in Consolidated Planning Grant funds being utilized and local funds for the remainder. Local match is split between Jefferson City(50%) and Cole County(50%).
DRAFT
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY 2025 UPWP 10
Work Element 526 - Public Transportation Planning
Assist public transportation and transit providers in fulfilling State, Local, and Federal requirements for
coordination and cooperative transportation planning through assistance with plan development,
technical assistance, mapping, data, and GIS functions.
Objectives / Activities
• Continue to assist JEFFTRAN with the maintenance of Route and Schedule Guide, individual route
maps, and other tools to serve JEFFTRAN patrons.
• Provide JEFFTRAN mapping, demographic, GIS, planning, and other technical assistance in
support of reporting requirements and evaluating possible changes in types of transit services
offered.
• Participate in transit and mobility management planning activities that support the goals and
objectives laid out in the Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan.
• Continue collaboration with other regional transit providers to improve efficiency and access in
Mid-Missouri.
• Update and maintain the Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan.
FY 2024 Accomplishments
• Provided assistance to JEFFTRAN in the update of route guides.
• Began update of the Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan.
FY 2025 Products
• Update route and schedule guide as needed.
• Maps, demographics, GIS analytics.
• Provide assistance to JEFFTRAN staff to improve service to patrons of.
• Collaborate with regional transit providers and human service agencies to meet shared goals.
• Complete update of the Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services Transportation Plan.
Responsible Party: CAMPO staff.
Funding: This work element includes only labor costs.
Work Element Cost Type
Federal
CPG Funds 80%
Local
Match 20% Total
Percent of Work
Program Budget
526 Labor $42,003 $10,501 $52,503 11%
Note: A portion of funding for the update of the Coordinated Public Transit-Human Services
Transportation Plan may be provided via a Missouri Highways and Transportation Commission
Public Transportation Planning Grant (FTA 5304 Funds). This grant may provide up to $25,000 in
federal grant funds and require a 20% local match. If applied for, these funds would not increase
the overall CAMPO budget, but would decrease the amount of CPG funds used for this work
element.
This grant would potentially be applied for in FY 2024 and used in both FY 2024 and FY 2025.
These funds are not programmed into the UPWP due to the uncertainty of timing and availability of
funds.
DRAFT
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY 2025 UPWP 11
Work Element 527 - Safe and Accessible Transportation Planning
Engage in specified planning activities to increase safe and accessible options for multiple travel modes
for people of all ages and abilities, including pedestrians, bicyclists, public transportation users,
children, older individuals, individuals with disabilities, motorists, and freight vehicles.
Objectives / Activities
• Implement CAMPO Complete Streets standards and policies as defined in the adopted Livable
Streets (Complete Streets) Policy.
• Develop and maintain a Complete Streets prioritization plan that identifies projects to improve
the safety, mobility, or accessibility of a street.
• Participate in the Missouri Complete Streets (MOCS) Advisory Committee.
• Participate in the Missouri Coalition for Roadway Safety.
• Educate jurisdictions and stakeholder about Complete Streets standards and policies.
FY 2024 Accomplishments
• Participated in activities, meetings, and conferences including Missouri Coalition for Roadway
Safety.
• Completed development of a prioritized list of projects as part of the update of the Capital
Area Active Transportation Plan.
• Facilitated stakeholder and/or jurisdiction development of pedestrian and bicycle education
programs.
• Provided assistance to Missouri Pedestrian and Bicycle Federation in planning and/or hosting the
2024 Active Transportation Summit.
FY 2025 Products
• Host a Complete Streets Training or other similar safety/accessibility training that meets the
requirements outlined in 23 U.S.C. 134 §11201 and §11206.
• Implement the safety related goals and strategies as developed as part of the Capital Area
Active Transportation Plan.
• Provide assistance to Missouri Pedestrian and Bicycle Federation in planning and/or hosting the
2024 Active Transportation Summit.
• Provide assistance to jurisdiction in the pursuit of funding for safety initiatives, infrastructure,
and/or programing.
Responsible Party: CAMPO staff.
Funding: This work element includes only labor costs.
Work Element Cost Type Federal PL Funds 100% Local Match 20% Total Percent of Work Program Budget
527 Labor $3,233 $0 $3,233* 0.7%
* The 2021 Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) requires each MPO to use at least 2.5% of its PL funds on specified planning
activities related to Safe and Accessible Transportation Planning (Work Element 527). PL funds constitute ~80% of CPG
funds and the FY 2024 2.5% estimate is $3,451. The FY 2025 estimate will not be available until December 2024.
DRAFT
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY 2025 UPWP 12
Appendix A – Financial Summary
Anticipated Expenditures & Revenue
CAMPO receives funding from the FHWA (PL) and FTA (5303) through the Consolidated Planning Grant (CPG)
administered by MoDOT. Funding consists of 80% federal and 20% local matching funds; Jefferson City
contributes 15% and Cole County contributes 5% except where noted differently.
Note: The Traffic Study for the US 54/63/50 Tri-Level Interchange deviates from the local match statement
above. The local match requirement is split between Jefferson City (50%) and Cole County (50%).
CAMPO may over-program or under-program annual CPG or PL allocations in order to maintain a CPG balance
to provide flexibility in accommodating large scale planning efforts that may require added staff or consultant
services. Some years may require more funding than others in order to meet MPO planning goals and federal
requirements. CAMPO may apply for and receive other grant funds that may offset the use of CPG funds
outlined above. Depending on the nature of the funding and project utilizing said funding, CAMPO will follow
the amendment and administrative modification processes, outlined in the UPWP.
Table 1: FY 2025 CAMPO Budget*
* Rounded to the nearest whole number. ** The City of Jefferson covers all the Utility and Capital Purchases expenses, except for some specific software licenses used for publishing or mapping.
1 The 2021 Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) requires each MPO to use at least 2.5% of its PL funds (the FHWA portion of the CPG) on
specified planning activities related to Safe and Accessible Transportation Planning (Work Element 527).
2 The project is anticipated to cost up to $500,000, with only $200,000 in Consolidated Planning Grant funds being utilized and local funds for
the remainder. Local match is split between Jefferson City (50%) and Cole County (50%).
Cost Category Federal - CPG (80%) Local (20%) Total (100%)
Advertising $2,080 $520 $2,600
Postage $240 $60 $300
Printing $160 $40 $200
Copies $160 $40 $200
Office Supplies $800 $200 $1,000
Food $240 $60 $300
Operational Supplies $800 $200 $1,000
Subtotal $4,480 $1,120 $5,600
Dues & Publications $1,200 $300 $1,500
Training & Education $3,600 $900 $4,500
Tuition Reimbursement $2,400 $600 $3,000
Prof. Services - US 54/63/50 Tri-Level Study2 $200,000 $50,000 $250,000
Subtotal $207,200 $51,800 $259,000
Equipment Maintenance $0 $0 $0
Vehicle Wash $0 $0 $0
Maintenance Agreement $1,920 $480 $2,400
Subtotal $1,920 $480 $2,400
Equipment/software $2,720 $680 $3,400
Subtotal $2,720 $680 $3,400
Total Direct Costs $216,320 $54,080 $270,400
Labor Costs - CPG (80%)Federal - CPG (80%) Local (20%) Total (100%)
Salaries plus benefits (CPG Funds)$167,440 $41,860 $209,300
Labor Costs - PL (100%)Federal - PL (100%)No Match Total (100%)
Salaries plus benefits (PL Funds - Safety)1 $3,233 $0 $3,233
Total Labor Costs $170,673 $41,860 $212,533
Federal Funds Local Match Total (100%)
$386,993 $95,940 $482,933
Direct Costs
Materials & Supplies
Other Contracted Services
Equipment Repair & Maintenance
Capital Purchases & Utilities**
Total MPO Budget
DRAFT
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY 2025 UPWP 13
Table 2: FY 2025 Work Element Funding Summary - Consolidated Planning Grant and Local Funds
Table 3: FY 2025 Local Match by Jurisdiction
*Numbers are rounded to the nearest whole number. Staff salaries are based on an hourly rate (base + fringe). Staff time allocations are subject to
change as planning activities fluctuate. The MPO Executive Director position is full-time, but is not funded by the MPO and does not appear in the tableabove. The MPO Director is the Director of the Jefferson City Department of Planning and Protective Services; MPO activities are only a portion of theDirector’s job duties.
1 The 2021 Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) requires each MPO to use at least 2.5% of its PL funds (the FHWA portion of the CPG) on specified planning
activities related to Safe and Accessible Transportation Planning (Work Element 527).
2 The project is anticipated to cost up to $500,000, with only $200,000 in Consolidated Planning Grant funds being utilized and local funds for theremainder. Local match is split between Jefferson City (50%) and Cole County (50%).
Table 4: Anticipated Available Federal Consolidated Planning Grant (CPG) Balance Revenue
*The final amount of the FY 2024 CPG Allocation will not be released by MoDOT until May of 2024. This UPWP will have been adopted before this
information is made available. Additionally, the MoDOT FY2024 SPR Work Program is also not available until after adoption of this document. CAMPOstaff may make modifications to totals in Table 4 after these allocation amounts are made available.**The Tri-level Study is excluded from the FY 2024 expenditure, and included in the FY 2025 expenditure. The project is anticipated to begin in FY 2024,
but most of the expenditure may occur in FY 2025. It is anticipated to cost up to $500,000, with only $200,000 in Consolidated Planning Grant funds beingutilized and local funds for the remainder. Local match is split between Jefferson City (50%) and Cole County (50%).
Table 5: Anticipated Available Federal 2.5% Safety Set-Aside Balance Revenue
Work Element
Planning
Manager
(.30 FTE)
Planner,
Senior
(1 FTE)
Planner
(1 FTE)
Admin.
Asst.
(.10 FTE)Sub-Total
Total
Federal
CPG Funds
80%
Total
Local
Match
20%Total*
Percent
of
Work
Program
Budget
Labor Costs
521-Program Support & Administration $28,546 $0 $0 $6,804 $35,350 $28,280 $7,070 $35,350 7%
522-General Dev. & Comp. Planning $0 $9,699 $9,491 $0 $19,190 $15,352 $3,838 $19,190 4%
524-Short Range Transportation Planning $0 $5,542 $18,252 $0 $23,794 $19,035 $4,759 $23,794 5%
525-Long Range Transportation Planning $5,190 $44,800 $28,472 $0 $78,462 $62,770 $15,692 $78,462 16%
526-Public Transportation Planning $0 $32,791 $19,712 $0 $52,503 $42,003 $10,501 $52,503 11%
Subtotal $33,736 $92,832 $75,927 $6,804 $209,300 $167,440 $41,860 $209,300
Labor Costs Utilizing 100% PL Funds
527-Safe/Accessible Trans. Planning 1 $0 $3,233 $0 $0 $3,233 $3,233 $0 $3,233 0.7%
Labor Costs (Base + Fringe) Subtotal $33,736 $96,065 $75,927 $6,804 $212,533 $170,673 $41,860 $212,533 44%
$20,400 $16,320 $4,080 $20,400 4%
$250,000 $200,000 $50,000 $250,000 52%
$270,400 $216,320 $54,080 $270,400 56%
$386,993 $95,940 $482,933 100%
Direct Costs Subtotal
Total*
521-Direct Costs - Program Support & Administration
525-Direct Costs - US 54/63/50 Tri-Level Study2
Direct Costs
Category Jefferson City Cole County Total*
Labor Costs (excludes work element 527 - Safety)1 $31,395 $10,465 $41,860
521-Direct Costs - Program Support & Administration $3,060 $1,020 $4,080
525-Direct Costs - US 54/63/50 Tri-Level Study2 $25,000 $25,000 $50,000
Total*$59,455 $36,485 $95,940
CPG Local Match
CPG Balance for end of FY2023 $552,333
FY 2024 CPG Allocation*$172,841
FY 2024 UPWP CPG Expenditure - Anticipated (excludes Tri-Level Study)**-($169,636)
CPG Balance for end of FY2024 - Anticipated*Subtotal $555,538$0FY 2025 CPG Allocation - Estimated per MoDOT's FY24 SPR Work Program $172,884
FY 2025 CPG Programmed Expenditure - Anticipated (Including 100% of Tri-Level Study)**-($386,993)
FY 2025 END OF YEAR Remaining Unprogrammed CPG Funds Anticipated $341,429
Consolidated Planning Grant Balance
2.5% Safety Set-Aside Allocation Balance for end of FY2023 $3,286
FY 2024 2.5% Safety Set-Aside Allocation - Estimated $3,451
FY 2024 2.5% Safety Set-Aside Expenditure -($5,176)
CPG Balance for end of FY2024 - Anticipated*Subtotal $1,561$0FY 2025 2.5% Safety Set-Aside Allocation - Estimated $3,451
FY 2025 2.5% Safety Set-Aside Expenditure -($3,233)
FY 2025 END OF YEAR Remaining Unprogrammed 2.5% Safety Set-Aside Funds Anticipated $1,779
2.5% Safety Set-Aside Balance
DRAFT
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY 2025 UPWP 14
Appendix B – CAMPO Boundary Map
The CAMPO Metropolitan Planning Area (MPA) Boundary was approved by the CAMPO Board of
Directors January 17, 2024 and was approved by the Governor of Missouri January 31, 2024. The
MPA includes the jurisdictions of Holts Summit, Jefferson City, St. Martins, Taos, Wardsville, and portions
of unincorporated, non-urbanized areas within Cole and Callaway Counties.
DRAFT
Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization FY 2025 UPWP 15
Appendix C - Modifications and Amendments
Amendments
No. Description Board Approval One DOT Approval
Administrative Modifications
No. Description of Modification Date
DRAFT