Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout2024-03-12 packetNOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING AND TENTATIVE AGENDA City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission Tuesday, March 12, 2024 ~ 6:00 p.m. John G. Christy Municipal Building, Council Chambers, 320 E. McCarty Street Join on your computer, mobile app or room device Click here to join the meeting Meeting ID: 249 277 117 675 Passcode: p5WEzL Download Teams | Join on the web Or call in (audio only) +1 872-242-9031,,397690566# United States, Chicago Phone Conference ID: 397 690 566# Find a local number | Reset PIN TENTATIVE AGENDA 1. Introductions and Roll Call 2. Adoption of Agenda (as printed or reordered) 3. Approval of February 13, 2024 Meeting Minutes 4. Old Business 5. New Business a. Demolition Review – 2909 West Truman Blvd. b. Application for Landmark Designation – 612 E. McCarty St. c. Section 106 Review – 1421 E. Miller Street 6. Other Business a. HPF Grant Updates • Phase II – W. Main Survey • Design Guidelines b. MSP Updates c. Paul Bruhn Grant Updates d. HPC Code Revision e. Historic Preservation Month – May activities 7. Public Comment 8. Dates to Remember a. Next Regular Meeting Date – April 9, 2024 9. Adjournment City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Regular Meeting – February 13, 2024 City Council Chambers – John G. Christy Municipal Building 320 E. McCarty Street/Virtual WebEx Meeting Commission Members Present Attendance Record Dr. Debra Foster Greene, Vice Chair 2 of 2 Brian Warren 2 of 2 Brad Schaefer 1 of 2 Laura Ward 1 of 2 Tiffany Patterson 1 of 2 Commission Members Absent Alan Wheat Dr. Christine Boston Donna Deetz Staff Present Aaron Mealy, City Council Liaison Rachel Senzee, Neighborhood Services Supervisor Dawn Kirchner, Neighborhood Services Specialist Guests Present None Call to Order Dr. Greene called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Adoption of Agenda Ms. Patterson moved to adopt the agenda as printed and Ms. Ward seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Approval of Regular Meeting Minutes Mr. Warren moved to approve the minutes from January 9, 2024 regular meeting as written and Ms. Patterson seconded. The motion passed unanimously. Old Business Dr. Greene confirmed that there is no old business to be covered. New Business Section 106 Review – 715 Clark Avenue Any project that is utilizing federal funds is required to go through Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. One of the requirements is that we engage the tribes as well as the State Historic Preservation Office to make sure that we are not negatively impacting cultural resources. This project is a Community Development Block Grant Project. It came through our emergency home repair program. Property owner is seeking to make the bathroom more accessible for her wheelchair bound child. Property owner can barely fit the wheelchair through the doorway and has issues with transferring her child from wheelchair to shower and move around in the bathroom. She is asking for ADA retrofits to her home. In order to increase the area, it would involve removing an interior wall and relocating the plumbing and electrical fixtures and adding a wall back by taking up floor space from an adjoining room. One of the requirements before we send this off to the state historic preservation office and tribes for review is that we bring it before the Historic Preservation Commission. In the packets is the criteria that we would submit along with the recommendation from staff. Since this property is not in a National Register Historic District or within a local historic district, the adequate documentation has been provided and there will be no historic properties affected by the current project. Ms. Patterson had a comment about the language, “It doesn’t matter if it is a local landmark or eligible, listed in the National Register, or “eligible” for listing in the National Register under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. I would say that there might be an eligible district in that neighborhood and then I would say I don’t think this would have an adverse effect on that property, but I don’t think that the language provided is accurate under Section 106. Not sure how to address that but in the future, we might want to address the wording because it does not match the wording of Section 106. But I don’t think redoing the bathroom will have an adverse effect on that property.” Rachel clarified. This is a document the City produces, so it can be changed. Within the checklist it states, “Property is designated a Local Landmark by the City of Jefferson and/or is listed, or eligible for listing, on the National Register of Historic Places.” Rachel stated that the edit would be made and if that was the vote of the commission, it would go to Dr. Greene for signature. After some discussion, it was decided to change the wording to, “The property is designated a City of Jefferson Landmark and/or is eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. There will be no adverse effect by the current project if approved by this Commission.” Ms. Patterson made the motion to approve the amended language. Ms. Ward seconded the motion. The motion was passed. Dr. Greene requested a motion to approve the Section 106 submission for 715 Clark Avenue with amendment. Ms. Ward made the motion, Ms. Patterson seconded the motion. The motion was passed unanimously. HPF Grant updates a.Phase II – W. Main Survey – An amended grant agreement was received from the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). Staff are preparing to formally go through the process to accept that amendment. Then we will have to send a change order through City Council because it pushed the project over $25,000. A grant extension through July 15 was also received. b.Design Guidelines – A final draft of the guidelines was received from H3 Studios today. Rachel will send that out to the commission for comments, and questions so it can be processed. Staff will be reviewing the document. All comments/ questions will be shared with the consultant. Once the product has been finalized, it will be held until the Code has been updated, because some of the design guidelines are contingent upon the Code. MSP Updates The city has been working with the State Office of Administration. They received a report from PGAV of what the planning document would look like for the Missouri Penitentiary. That plan has been made public. There was a $93 million budget request from the state legislature, broken up into phases. This budget request still has to go through the state budget cycle. Paul Bruhn Grant Updates City staff have the ability to work with the National Park service to request an extension for this grant Of the four projects; One project is completely underway and has already submitted a reimbursement request. The other three projects are still within their procurement phase so they are trying to find consultants and contractors. They are having struggles with the window restoration and finding contractors that will do smaller bid jobs. One project, 300 East high is still in environmental review because of the turret and roofline. Rachel has approached the subrecipients about updating the HPC about their projects and they were agreeable. This will probably occur at the April/May meeting depending on availability. HPC Code Revision Updates Legal has returned the draft to Rachel. He did have a couple of questions. Rachel anticipates that the code will go out for public comment within the next two weeks. The document will go to the Code Revision Committee and have them disseminate the information to their stakeholders. We will also do a press release to solicit general public comment for 30 days. Once all of those public comments are received, we will have a Code Revision Stakeholders committee meeting to address comments or concerns. Missouri American Water Filter Building Project Updates – Staff received feedback from Missouri American Water regarding the conditions we placed on the new filtration building. They want to incorporate some of the design elements from the old building to the new building. It was also requested that they update the fence to be more visually friendly in the residential setting. Th ere were no questions on the water plant. Dr. Greene asked, if, under the Paul Bruhn Grant, had the money for the JC Penney building been de - obligated? Rachel said no, not yet. Staff have reached out to the property owner and they indicated that there was some delay in getting their engineering report back so we gave them until March. Essentially, if there is no progress by March, then we would go ahead and de-obligate and their project is no longer considered a Federal Project. With the time left, there are three likely options: 1) Give the money back to the Federal Government; 2) Open it up for another competitive round; 3) Assigning those funds to already existing projects. The four active projects are experiencing cost overruns so Option 3 would be her recommendation to the Commission. It would be approximately $31,000 each if it was divided among the remaining projects. Public Comment No public comments were received. Dates to Remember The next Regular Meeting is Tuesday, March 12, 2024, at 6:00 p.m. Adjournment Mr. Warren made a motion and Ms. Ward seconded the motion to adjourn the meeting. The motion passed unanimously. Meeting Adjourned City of Jefferson Department of Planning & Protective Services 320 E. McCarty St Jefferson City, MO 65101 Phone: 573-634-6410 icalanning(niieffcitymo.org www.j efferso nc itymo _gov APPLICATION FOR DEMOLITION REVIEW/CLEARANCE TO THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION In accordance with Section 8-43 of the City Code Property Owner(s): Email Address: Phone Number: Property Address: Unilever Horne & Personal Care Rinskip@pnmusbuilders.com 404-219-5525 2900 W Truman Blvd. Jefferson City. MO 65109 Date of Construction: April 2024 anticipated start 1_ The undersigned hereby request(s): ✓ Demolition Review (Application fee $55.00) — For properties that meet the following criteria: • Structure(s) age 50 — 99 years old; or • Structure(s) listed on the National Register of Historic Places- or • Structure(s) designated as a Local Landmark. Demolition Clearance (Application fee $108.00) — For properties that meet the following criteria: • Structure(s) age 100+ years old; or • Structure located within local historic district. 2. The application is filed for the following described real estate: A. Current address: 2933 A —Ay'''. 6..°. _e' °' e5"3 B_ In 1969, the City updated their addressing system. Did this property have a different address prior to 1969? Yes ✓ No If so, what was it? C. Number of structures to be demolished: Two buildings D. Local Historic District Name: NIA E. Landmark Designation Name: WA F. National Register Name: NIA G. Recent uses: Storage H. Structure Vacant? ✓ Yes ✓ No If yes, for how long? s^aier wiairg has seen .a a n •oraF•xax s ?gars 3. Will any architectural features and/or fixtures be preserved, donated or recycled? Yes 1 No If so, explain: Na, both buildings ill be dep)olishod and dobris h?uled off Individuals should contact the ADA Coordinator at (573) 634-6570 to request accommodations or alternative formats as required under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please allow three business days to process the request. 4. Digital photos are required to be submitted electronically as part of the application. Photos must have been taken within the last 90 days of all exterior sides, interior rooms and stairwells. Photographs must show all areas and characteristics of the structure, not just those areas in disrepair. If multiple structures or addresses, the photos must be labeled to distinguish between structures. Photos submitted via USB Drive CD ✓ Dropbox Other Criteria Review: 1. Base on research of the property or to the best of your knowledge, is the property: a. Associated with history of the City of Jefferson, Cole County, State of Missouri or the nation? Yes ✓ No Explain: Builders are associated with Unilever manufacturing b. Associated with persons of significance in the history of City of Jefferson, Cole County, State of Missouri or the nation? Yes ✓ No Explain: Buildings are.' 'ere used for oroduct storage c. A representation of particular type, design, period or method of construction (i.e. bungalow, four square, etc.)? Yes ,/ No Explain: CMI1 Pre-Fna nePrPd Mortal hltildinr�c d. Represents the work of a master designer or architect or possesses high architectural value. Yes ✓ No Unknown e. An example of cultural, political, economic, social or historic heritage of the city? Yes ✓ No Unknown f. Contains elements of design, detail, material or craftsmanship which represent a significant construction innovation. Yes ✓ No Unknown g_ it is part of or related to a square, park or other distinctive area that was or should be developed or preserved according to a plan based on a historic or architectural motif. Yes ✓ No Note: Here is an example of architectural motif h. it is an established and familiar visual feature of a neighborhood or of the entire community. Yes ✓ No Unknown i. It has yielded, or is likely to yield archeological artifacts and/or information. Yes No 2. Will the demolition be detrimental to: a. The visual or spatial relationships to designated landmarks, National Register Sites, or the streetscape of a local historic district or National Register District. Yes ✓ No Unknown b. The architectural, cultural, historic or contextual character of property designated as a local historic landmark, local historic district, or building or area listed on the National Register of Historic Places. Yes No Unknown 3. Why can't the property be rehabilitated or restored with reasonable economical return? Attach additional pages if necessary. We cannot reasonably retofit tre exst^g buildings to hold the planned future corveyc' and ASRS system c-ae to the structural & spacial mrtations. This new egwprre^t and planned warehouse will greatly enhance.'opt more t^e facility's Frod''cacn and I^g uics �tiy 9 tre demo ton o{ the ^•, ldu+g CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that I am the owner of the named property, or that the requested Demolition Review/Clearance is authorized by the owner of record and I have been authorized by the owner to make this application as his/her agent. Signature. ,rte., Please check: Property Owner Authorized Agent ✓ Licensed Contractor Other Date: 02/19/2024 Cole County Assessor Parcel Reportteport Oat?: 220,2024 Property Details Parcel ID 0508340003001002 Property Address: 2909 W TRUMAN REAR BLVD MO 65109 Owner: CITY OF JEFFERSON 320 E MCCARTY ST JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65101 Deed Book -Page Date: Section , (159-127 /0/0) Township Range: 34/45/12 Acreage: 67.19 ac. School District: JC Fire District: Year Built: Sq. Ft. (above grade): Fin. Bsmt Sz (sq. ft): Land and Improvement Appraised Values Land (Ag): SO Imp (Ag): 50 Land (Res): 50 Imp (Res): 50 Land SO Imp $0 (Comm): (Comm): Date Certified: 2023 Appraised: 50 Property Description: PT E1/2 SW QTR 983.40 N LINE X 1320(S) E LINE. ALSO PT NE SEC 3/44/12, BEG NE COR INTER N TEN MILE DR & SCHUMATE CHAP RD; N 270 (S); E 940(S); S 150(S) SE 340 (S); S 200(S); W 1250(S) Parcel Notes: #18327 NON-TAXABLE Parcel doto is for assessment purposes only. /t is not o legc/ survey and does not purport to representa property boundary surrey of the porcets shown It should not be used fix conveyances or the establishment of properly boundaries. 1960 Aerial City of Jefferson, MissouriCole County, Missouri Notes Parcel data is for assessment purposes only. It is not a legal survey and does not purport to represent a property boundary survey of the parcels shown. It should not be used for conveyances or the establishment of property boundaries. Do not use for navigation. 0 500 1000 ft 1974 Aerial City of Jefferson, MissouriCole County, Missouri NOTES: Upper Plastics (1965-1966); Lacquer Building (c. 1974) North 0 200 400 ft Parcel data is for assessment purposes only. It is not a legal survey and does not purport to represent a property boundary survey of the parcels shown. It should not be used for conveyances or the establishment of property boundaries. Do not use for navigation.03/07/2024Printed on rant" pTgNC.I cry ramie Chesebrough-Pond's seeks OP, production, 7t Ms. Una Set pa. .yea ere. port Sae a Inert r le Is ter pen a. a. p. Ire at* 11* r r mired iser••••••• per see le a Pad ,l* r w Omelip r Year Me MrN roll Y .S. rarer. e a r b re ha al le • w rem of is shwa r .•••••••• Mang* . rr••••• irr11= 1 • • Ire rear a tessera Or. 1/e el Peen •- Me w se Pa. Pe Mr 4:44 Cheer - a.M• be, • r•r,1w a r••.444M .a see dam veer Is. r r M • -a! M ape I.i••_•, a Wain Se e rr e• In the e.me eV ••e.• r wear Sella •am• aide ear s. Err nee•e-4 M Peel • Ne•II...p11'1 f •par . a pour ear eee.I_•• atria a • be�er�Sb l�• b ' .�H'�... •••••••••I• . - C%* ae• . r.I sera -. rare a e. .setae a —4 - r a ea pee am .•. ems Mr .ell r par re re rape aa. Pet r pia sae. Leone J.n-a. 6n err peep war.•. w p•rela. •flea% .Ma a• .4 Ili wrest e s. VIII nee ream r a Ile M tK. it., •.•n ISM ream it ." Leer -a freer •le 11 ant .n.16.. . 1� r• ,• ISM Mt OMR raw j.- • r • em. a •••••••• re rabbi" errs' la a rye of 'M MOO ektenreal WO so •f• are .ever Y sally 9.1 . a mµ Pa, resew ben.. - rare ••44.1.1 sere .Re 1110 e• AVMs C1er ••.e• um brat e. bar • al Mao we • Nimes, r eY •• Sarver* • µ. a e re r• mw lama "PS* r "les el 1 rem w f -1••$4•44•• •at mama a lea 1•xat rl e ar -pea le •• •. anal pre e r See•••• re el 111 item .=Mr ere Mob • error .r r e •a amity are r a el.r el r ore sea r re. ben" efe Or^• pa•II•• term • b.e ter et arelte ora.wrr arras. WI r pm.a M Om er - 1 satisfied workers of .1• •Ns. • r•M• rim •.rase Cliaral • lean set Orr le• pr. e• mom Or • or . *error. MIS e• IA Yel r enm ei •e1 • )per bee lie r•I. IS r•rad r -1 ern pea .arm as el .44•apn. Peal **mad Y M• ✓ eal es era roe eve Ile bl rW. reran r. wa.ea My •.w .a Nr ere wee et moon Ar1w• wr r arm Nr arm Kerr bra Ir Mr•••••4 sa Ms referees Or Mad IN 'pore° ern *WW1* a P. pal lads rake ever Myna .11 poll* w tan mir. tune tear ✓ arer artery pare Drys m w .re M Ili ell tear -rep . Prate _Y ratorr. -. aIMW.r em'-rr h.• err/ r ores yeas, -4 pre r age aeeaY :rimer • $4 R•••••t Ir aY OM eel A se pi*** •Is. tin • uo reel fat 1>V sr IS 1•• rr. travels u. •••• •Shia• W. ernnl. L pried re unless' emporia w -raer Ms .•lore• • nee 1ay.•m error re era ern I* Se omen rape al a 'Ps Mal eta, mania l amuse •r r art •••Ilona rte ea Ira Darr M M flea 6 IMO •.aid pa. lei Won e we s PSI Pia r .•a1• • lira w.aM ear• rages. .,m .aril ID* *ale Toe ter• rw r Mom ley h• ...ve•nn -. a Maas . •e.I. w bap rte -*M• se an a la S., or err • amen - Metre,.- • ear err re Varlet, Isar Greer w M are. •Y Pima* e.W In ell au r IS 44 1- •e , • •• r• II.• ..attpwr• are orb Or Se y nee Or ease los aweem•• rte pis eve. ere please rma, taller •Yer dereper1 .a t - Nail polish Ma ern shed, lob. meal... .mope•. le • 1. • t T Imllla is 1 rrl.fl• o f lave were •►•T ere tlll.d web npl pall,h rad rant AI Or are and a rho pia *dim II*. Mehl. Na. r- Naha* •e/ era M.e. Igri pry - posy pia it arnanl ea storm .r.... Ia. I• - lie er ear ell. Ira.-- ha•ce.r.nt• low per. In Am tee* lye IAM aka va4Me le lot ].•Mein fell •.... Irta.•.l e..•t. t\ewe T Iwo. Ont.) 1.0 ►••bem. ern r U. • ••••YU•• Mel area at r1•Ir11m1 •••••••• red y •Darrow ameta el a M at %••• e• ilea— • a.ar • rare Y •ere r •r rye w• • ■a eat rem Sew w IS k ear rer..n cenlbe we e�•r.l.q ors* . fl ee pee pone• 1St ♦ feel••.{.'. • par 1s.. I.• •lsn1.0 *alma • nil•.• Sal 4 4 et. er•a'tra Mora Po ma Sr ear Irae.M rya a 1�rrarr•. • a la .Y r• asap• Dewar ge ateetrar refry F ea Lieet w cedar tot Peer or - rarer M gal de r 1no• • pore. .4 r ray w a cumin* n ..- a prf• Tam -s• 1. Pre. • err _inner err. tee WY. Y. •r• a mere • now war ere . it r b•1 rmr•-J T.1•• Orr tap Part lat.- a a M a rear . 4—. F r 11 S . 1.l. P.M ea predate . I 4 II 11111 drive• r PHOTO LISTING – LACQUER BUILDING STAFF REPORT HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION – CITY OF JEFFERSON, MISSOURI March 12, 2024 Demolition Application. Application for demolition of two structures located at 2900-2909 West Truman Blvd. NATURE OF REQUEST The purpose of the request is to demolish two industrial buildings located at 2900-2909 West Truman Blvd. The Upper Plastics building is the larger structure located at 2900 West Truman Blvd. and was constructed in 1965-1966. and the smaller, Lacquer building was constructed c. 1970. Unilever acquired Chesebrough-Ponds in December 1986. STAFF ANALYSIS Historic Preservation Review Y N Comments Property listed on the National Register? X Property awarded Landmark Designation? X Is the property character, interest, or value as part of the development, heritage or cultural characteristics of the community, county, state or nation? X Originially Chesebrough Ponds, on structure was built in 1965/66, providing hundreds of jobs to the citizens of Jefferson City. Unilever purchased the company in 1987. Is the property location a site of a significant local, county, state or national event? X Is the property identification with a person or persons who significantly contributed to the development of the community, county, state or nation? X Is the property embodiment of distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style valuable for the study of a period, type, method of construction or use of indigenous materials? X Is the property identified as a work of a master builder, designer, architect, or landscape architect whose individual work has influenced the development of the community, county, state or nation? X Is the property embodiment of elements of design, detailing, materials, or craftsmanship that render it architecturally significant? X Is the property unique location or singular physical characteristics that make it an established or familiar visual feature? X Is the property character as a particularly fine or unique example of a utilitarian structure, including, but not limited to, farmhouses, gas stations, or other commercial structures, with a high level of integrity or architectural significance? X Demolition Review/Clearance Application – 225 Flora Drive Page 2 Historic Preservation Commission STAFF RECOMMENDATION In reviewing criteria in Section 8-43F , staff find the structure is notable with respect to historic value by reason of: a. Its association with an event or events that significantly contributed to the broad patterns of the history or architectural heritage of the City, County, and State. Based of the findings, consideration for the nature of the surrounding area and the compatibility of the structure to existing adjacent structures, land uses, and redevelopment should be considered. Current zoning of this area is M-2 General Industrial District. The property owner has plans to redevelop the property for future manufacturing and distribution use. FORM OF MOTION Motion that the Demolition Clearance Application for 2900-2909 West Truman Blvd. is recommended for approval by this commission. 2/29/24, 12:40 PM Bringing new life to McCarty Street home I Jefferson City News Tribune Eight years later, Wheatley sold to David and Elizabeth Agniel, who sold to Theodore and Madonna Agniel in 1978. In 1993, the home was sold to B&M partnership and in 2003 to Go Property LLC. Current owners Tony and Jenny Smith bought it 2011 from Carrie Armstrong and Matt Walston. https DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES MEMORANDUM TO: Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Rachel Senzee, Neighborhood Services Supervisor DATE: March 7, 2024 RE: Landmark Award – Nomination – 612 E McCarty Staff Report The Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) received a Landmark Award application for 612 E McCarty. The building is included in the School Street Local Historic District. For local landmark status, the HPC is tasked with providing a recommendation to City Council based on the designation criteria specified in Sec. 8-44 C. of the City Code. Staff found designation of 612 E McCarty could be eligible based on the following criteria: 1. Its character, interest or value as part of the development, heritage or cultural characteristics of the community, county, state or nation. 2. Its location as a site of significant local, county state or national event. 3. Its embodiment of distinguishing characteristics of an architectural style valuable for the study of a period, type, method of construction or use of indigenous materials. 4. Its embodiment of elements of design, detailing, materials, or craftsmanship that render it architecturally significant. Enclosed is the Landmark Award application, photos, and relevant property research. The nominated building is located within the Regulatory Floodway. Design standards to preserve cultural resources poses the potential to negatively impact the property owner’s ability to be in compliance with historic design standards, floodway regulations, and local ordinance. That stated, all compliance conditions have already been imposed on the property through its inclusion in the School Street Local Historic District. Staff recommendation is approval of the designation of 612 E McCarty as a local Landmark. Enclosures City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission Assessment Section 106 Review Contact Person/Address: Federal Agency Project: The City of Jefferson Historic Preservation Commission has reviewed the information submitted on the above referenced project. Based on this review, we have made the following determination: ❑After review of initial submission, the project area has low potential for the occurrence of cultural resources. ❑Adequate documentation has been provided. There will be “no historic properties affected” by the current project and is approved by this commission . ❑Property is designated a Local Landmark by the City of Jefferson and/or is listed, or eligible for listing, on the National Register of Historic Places. There will be an “adverse effect” by the current project and is not approved by this commission. ❑Property is designated a Local Landmark by the City of Jefferson and/or is listed, or eligible for listing, on the National Register of Historic Places. There will be a “no adverse effect” by the current project and is approved by this commission. If you have questions, you may contact in writing the City of Jefferson, Planning and Protective Services, Attn: Anne Stratman, Neighborhood Services Specialist, 320 E. McCarty Street, Jefferson City, MO, 65101, or by email at astratman@jeffersoncitymo.gov or call 573-634-6358. By: _________________________________________________ Date:___________________ Historic Preservation Commission Representative Community Development Block Grant - Entitlement Anne Stratman City Hall, 320 E McCarty St Jefferson City, MO 65101 1421 E Miller - Residential, Single Family Emergency Home Repair The homeowner is concerned with potential water infiltration where the flat roof meets the rear of the structure. The homeowner is requesting replacement of the flat roof. Photo 3 Photo 4 Photo 5 Photo 6: (E. Miller and Vetter Lane) Photo 7: (E. Miller Street and Clark Avenue) Photo 8: (Flat roof on back of house) Photo 9