The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My Public Portal AboutResolution 00-39531 1 1 RESOLUTION NO. 00 -3953 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THE CITY TO BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (CMP) AND ADOPTING THE CMP LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION REPORT, IN ACCORDANCE WITH CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65089 WHEREAS, the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority ( "MTA "), acting as the Congestion Management Agency for Los Angeles County, adopted the 1999 Congestion Management Program; and WHEREAS, the adopted CMP requires that MTA annually determine that the County and cities within the County are conforming to all CMP requirements; and WHEREAS, the adopted CMP requires submittal to the MTA of the CMP local implementation report by September 1 of each year; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was conducted relative to this item by the City Council at their meeting of August 15, 2000. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF TEMPLE CITY DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the City of Temple City has taken all of the following actions, and that the City is in conformance with all applicable requirements of the 1999 CMP. 1. The City of Temple City has conducted annual traffic counts and calculated levels of service for selected arterial intersections, consistent with the requirements identified in the CMP Highway and Roadway System Chapter. 2. The City of Temple City has locally adopted and continues to implement a transportation demand management ordinance, consistent with the minimum requirements identified in the CMP Transportation Demand Management Chapter. 3. The City of Temple City has locally adopted and continues to implement a land use analysis program, consistent with the minimum requirements identified in the CMP Land Use Analysis Program Chapter. 4. The City of Temple City has prepared a local implementation report, consistent with the requirements identified in the CMP. This report balances traffic congestion impacts due to growth within Temple City with transportation improvements and demonstrates that the City of Temple City is meeting its responsibilities under the Countywide Deficiency Plan. SECTION 2. That the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and shall forward a copy of this Resolution to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. The City Clerk shall enter this resolution into the book of original resolutions. ATTEST: 0 City Clerk APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of August, 2000. Resolution No. 00 -3953 Page 2 I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution, Resolution No. 00 -3953 was adopted by the City Council of the City of Temple City at a regular meeting held on the 15th day of August, 2000 by the following vote: AYES: Councilman - Breazeal, Gillanders, Wilson, and Souder NOES: Councilman-None ABSENT: Councilman -Brook �^ 1v1 ` evu'i City Clerk 0 1 1 1 1 APPENDIX E - GUIDELINES FOR LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION REPORTS PAGE E -8 AND SELF CERTIFICATION EXHIBIT E-2 DEFICIENCY PLAN STATUS SUMMARY JURISDICTION: TEMPLE CITY REPORT PERIOD JUNE 01, 1999 to MAY 31, 2000 1. Carryover Credit from Last Year's Local Implementation Report + 1, 037. 2. Total Current Congestion Mitigation Goal [from Section I] ( -) 539. Subtotal Current Credit (Goal) = 98. 3. Transportation Improvements Credit Claims [from Section II] + 0. NET DEFICIENCY PLAN BALANCE = 498. CONTACT: ROBERT DAWSON, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR PHONE: (626) 285 -2171 1997 Congestion Management Program for Los Angeles County November 1997 APPENDIXE - GUIDELINES FOR LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION REPORTS PAGE 9 AND SELF CERTIFICATION EXHIBIT E-3 (continued) SECTION I - NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REPORT PART 2: NEW DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS IMPORTANT: Adjustments may be claimed only for 1) development permits that were both issued and revoked, expired or v.-ithdrawn during the reporting period, and 2) demolition of any structure within the reporting period. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS Category Single- Family Multi - Family Group Quarters Number of Dwelling Units Impact Value Sub -total 83 x 6.80 = 564 x 4.76 = x 1.98 = COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS Catenary Commercial 0 -299 KSF Commercial 300+ KSF Eatine and Drinkinc Thousands of Gross Square Feet 14,700 Value per 1000 sa.ft. x 22.2'8 Sub -total x 17.80 = 262 66.99 = NON- RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS Category Lodging Industrial Office 0-49 KSF Office 50-299 KSF Office 300+ KSF Medical Government Irstitutional/Educatipn University Thousands of Gross Sauare Feet 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Per Student Other (Describe) TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS, POINTS = Daily Trips Value per 1000 sa.ft. Sub -total x 7.21 = x 6.08 = x 16.16 = x 10.50 = x 7.35 _ x 16.90 = x 20.95 = x 7.68 = x 1.66 = Impact Value Sub -total 0.71 = 826 1997 Congestion Management Program for Los Angeles County November 1997 APPENDIX E - GUIDELINES FOR LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION REPORTS PAGE E -10 AND SELF CERTIFICATION EXHIBIT E -3 (continued) SECTION I - NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REPORT PART 2: NEW DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS IMPORTANT: Adjustments may be claimed only for 1) development permits that were both issued and revoked, expired or withdrawn during the reporting period, and 2) demolition of any structure within the reporting period. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS Catezory S ingle- Family Multi - Family Group Quarters Number of Dwelling Units Impact Value Sub -total 40 6.80 4.76 1.98 _ 272 COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS Category Commercial 0 -299 KSF Commercial 300+ KSF Eating and Drinking Thousands of Gross Sauare Feet .682 Value per Sub -total 1000 sa.ft. x 22.23 = 15 x 17.80 = x 66.99 = NON- RETAIL DEVELOPMENT ADJUSTMENTS Catezory Thousands of Gross Square Feet Value per 1000 sa.ft. Sub -total Lodging Industrial Office 0-49 KSF Office 50 -299 KSF Office 300+ KSF Medical Government Institutional/Education University Other (Describe) Per Student Daily Trips TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS, POINTS = x 7.21 = x 6.08 = x 16.16 = x 10.50 = x 7.35 = x 16.90 = x 20.95 = x 7.68 = x 1.66 = Impact Value Sub -total x 0.71 = 287 539 1997 Congestion Management Program for Los Angeles County November 1997 APPENDIX E - GUIDELINES FOR LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION REPORTS PAGE E-11 AND SELF CERTIFICATION EXHIBIT E -3 (continued) SECTION I - NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY REPORT PART 3: EXEMPTED DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY (NOT INCLUDED IN NEW DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY TOTALS) LowNery Low Income Housing High DensityResid. near Rail Stations Mixed Use Developments near Rail Stations Development Agreements entered into prior to July 10, 1989 Reconstruction or replacement of buildings damaged due to calamity Reconstruction of buildings damaged in the January 1994 earthquake 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 EXEMPTED DEVELOPMENT DEFINITIONS: Dwelling Units Dwelling Units 1000 gross sf Dwelling Units 1000 gross sf Dwelling Units 1000 gross sf Dwelling Units 1000 gross sf Dwelling Units 1. LowNery Low Income Housing: as defined by the California Department of Housing and Community Development as follows: Low - Income: equal to or less than 80% of the median income, with adjustments for family size. Very Low - Income: equal to or less than 50% of the median income, with adjustments for family size. 2. High Density Residential Near Rail Stations: development located within 1/4 mile of a fixed rail passenger station which contains a minimum of 24 dwelling units per acre and a minimum density per acre which is equal to or greater than 120 percent of the maximum residential density allowed under the local general plan and zoning ordinance. A project providing a minimum of 75 dwelling units per acre is automatically considered high density. 3. Mixed Uses Near Rail Stations: mixed use development located within 1/4 mile of a fixed rail passenger station, if more than half of the land area, or floor area, of the mixed use development is used for high density residential housing. 4. Development Agreements: projects that entered into a development agreement (as specified under Section 65864 of the California Government Code) with a local jurisdiction prior to July 10, 1989. 1997 Congestion Management Program for Los Angeles County November 1997 1 1 APPENDIX DEL INI,S FOR LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION REPORTS AND CER] IFICATION VAGE E -13 EXHIBIT E -4 SECTION II - TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS CREDIT CLAIMS 1. Project Number NONE 2. Strategy NONE 3. Project Description & Reference Documentation 4. Project Scope (units) ( ) 7. Expected Completion Date 10. Current Milestone 5. Credit Factor 8. Project Cost 1 1 . Previous Year Credit 14. Total Credits Claimed for All Projects 0 6. Project Credit Value 9. Local Participation ( %) 12. Milestone Factor 0 13. Net Current Value 1997 Congestion Management Program for Los Angeles County November 1997 APPENDIX E - GUIDELINES FOR LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION A'I ION IZI.P(>R I'S AND SELF-CERTIFICATION I ION PA(il: E -14 EXHIBIT E -5 SECTION Ill - FUTURE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS 1. Project Number UNKNOWN 2. Strategy UNKNOWN 3. Project Description & Reference Documentation 4. Project Scope (units) ( ) 5. Credit Factor 6. Project Credit Value 7. Expected Completion Date 8. Project Cost 9. Local Participation ( %) 10. Current Milestone 11. Previous Year Credit 12. Milestone Factor 13. Net Current Value 0 14. Total Credits Claimed for All Projects 0 1997 Congestion Management Program for Los Angeles County ititember 1997