Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAboutDraft CPC ApplicationEvaluationMatrixRev7.6.21APPLICATION EVALUATION MATRIX: This evaluation matrix will be used as a guide by the CPC in its decision -making process. Criterion Excellent Good Fair Inadequate Not Applicable Application completeness All answers and required documentation are provided A question is unanswered or a document missing Some questions are unanswered or some documents missing Multiple documents missing, questions unanswered, or significant further information required Visibility, public access, and community benefits High visibility, strong community benefit, and public access _ Good visibility, community benefit, and public access Low visibility, community benefit, and public access Unconvincing argument for community benefit or access Environmental design and practices for long-term maintenance Strongly incorporates such elements Some effort to incorporate such elements Limited effort to incorporate such elements Does not incorporate such elements Support from municipal, community groups and/or range of public voices Multiple letters of support and positive comments from broad community representation Some letters of support and positive comments from limited community representation Mixed public comments, but majority are favorable No letters of support. Most public comments opposed to project Alignment with specific goals in Community Preservation Plan and consistency with priorities in other town plans Strong alignment and consistency General alignment and consistency Weak alignment No alignment Universal design principles and ADA and MAAB accessibility regulations Strongly incorporates such elements Some effort to incorporate such elements Limited effort to incorporate such elements Does not incorporate universal design principles and/or comply with ADA/MAAB regulations Leveraged funding sources including in -kind contributions Significant additional sources of funding committed and/or in -kind contributions Some additional sources of funding committed and/or in -kind contributions Minimal additional sources of funding and/or in -kind contributions No additional sources of funding or in -kind contributions Addresses long-standing urgent needs or exceptional time- sensitive opportunities Clearly addresses long- standing or urgent needs and/or opportunities Addresses long-standing or urgent needs and/or opportunities Somewhat addresses an urgent need or opportunity Does not address urgent needs or a time sensitive opportunity 1 APPLICATION EVALUATION MATRIX: This evaluation matrix will be used as a guide by the CPC in its decision -making process. Criterion Excellent Good Fair Inadequate Not Applicable Feasibility regarding project management and team expertise Clearly documents project manager and team capacity (time dedicated to project, qualifications, and track record) Some documentation of project manager and team capacity (time dedicated to project, qualifications, and track record) Project manager and team have minimal qualifications, experience, or track record, or there are concerns about time dedicated to project Project manager and team have neither the required qualifications nor experience. Or project manager or team did not adequately perform on different CPA project Feasibility regarding timeline and milestones Timeline is logical, detailed with clear and specific milestones, and schedule is realistic for proposed project Timeline has relatively clear milestones, and schedule is likely realistic for proposed project Timeline is generic, possibly unrealistic, lacks detail and/or requires clarification Timeline does not demonstrate an understanding of project requirements or organization Feasibility regarding long- term maintenance plan and budget Maintenance plan is detailed and realistic, displaying sufficient and reliable resources to fund future maintenance _ Maintenance plan is feasible and identifies some resources to fund future maintenance Maintenance plan lacks thoroughness, supporting information, or reliable funding for future maintenance Maintenance plan is insufficient, and/or has no reliable funding for future maintenance Budget feasibility Budget is realistic and well -detailed including professional cost estimates or quotes Budget is realistic and includes professional cost estimates or quotes Budget lacks clarity and documentations such as cost assumptions, estimates, or quotes Budget is unrealistic, incomplete, and/or lacks clarity and cost estimates or quotes Two or more CPA categories Yes No Catalyst for transformative change to enhance aesthetics, connectivity, quality of life Demonstrates with compelling evidence, the project will lead to significant change to the community beyond the project itself Demonstrates, with some evidence, the project will lead to significant change to the community beyond the project itself Does not demonstrate the project will lead to significant change to the community beyond the project or makes the case without evidence Does not claim the project will lead to significant change to the community beyond the project 2