The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My Public Portal About12-1999-12 RESOLUTION NO. 1999 - 12 SCANNED A RESOLUTION AFFIRMING WAL-MART EAST, INC., OF COMPLIANCE WITH STATEMENTS OF BENEFITS WHEREAS, Wal-Mart East, Inc., (formerly known as Wal-Mart, Inc.) has heretofore been granted certain tax abatements in consideration of certain benefits for the City of Greencastle; and, WHEREAS, said company has submitted a form CF-1 as of January 11, 1999 for tax abatement granted in 1994; and WHEREAS, the Greencastle Common Council has reviewed the CF-1 form, a copy of which is attached hereto, and has found compliance with the Statements of Benefits as approved by the Greencastle Common Council; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Common Council of the City of Greencastle, Putnam County, Indiana, approves the CF-1 form as submitted as being in compliance with the Statements of Benefits previously filed by Wal-Mart East, Inc. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution of the Greencastle Common Council ,eTh be made a record and filed along with the CF-1 with the Putnam County Auditor. COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GREENCASTLE Barry Waynard David Masten A)L,/ i h Green Thomas Roach /2414!4,„ Mark N. Hammer Approved and signed by me this 13th day of April, 1 9 at COS', o'clock, p.m. Nancy A. P ichael, Mayor AT S : Pamela S. Jones, Clerk-surer a w.c rvn n •a ••-a y a� j Prescribed by the State Board of Tax Commissioners,1991 The records in this series are CONFIDENTIAL according to IC 6-1.1-35-9. • INSTRUCTIONS: 1. Property owners whose Statement of Benefits was approved after July 1, 1991 must file this form with the County Auditor and tl local Designating Body to show the extent to which there has been compliance with the Statement of Benefits. (This does not apply property located in a residentially distressed area). (IC 6-1.1-12.1-5.6) • 2. If the deduction applies to Real Estate and Improvements, then this form must be filed with the initial deduction applicatier 1 the annually within sixty(60)days after the end of each year in which the deduction is applicable. 3. For New Manufacturing Equipment, this form must be filed with Form 322 ERA/PP between March 1 and May 15 of each year, a filing extension under IC 6-1.1-3.7 has been granted. A person who obtains a filing extension must file between March 1 and June i of each year. '.SE rCUON=: : • :.•: .. _ • �:' •;�.,.:� .TAXPAYER INEORMAIION:�=' •-.•: . :,...:.,< •-;::..- 'Jame of taxpayer zd . Address of taxpayer(sweet are,number,city,state anted ZIP code) v/�//n A(/ //�/ / /30/ Sr E. /u ' S • ,EP7, Q/� Lit /o/✓ {�/LG�C- /ye 7,? 7/6 —e�O,�3 'Nam of contact person J / Telephone number ///,e L t /'kc—o�Jxi z2 . ( o/ ) a77-i/ z/ :.SECTION 2, :,_. - :_. . ..... _. ...._ - -.. .LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OFPROPERi'1C! • •- . • . I N e of designating body - y Resolution number r ,1/e5EA)USTE �/7-y gouda./L /7 — a 'Location of prope / --c Cou Taxing district • 3 3 g,flTt� 7 a/e5E,dg19,s �C� . f /3.s`` (1-- T Am 6,PEe,,il s/GE - /r/ •Description of real property improvelnents and/or new manufacttfring equipment to be acquired Estimated starting date • / C`�T,� 2 a /9:F NO //litiq /idg 1;00 O Estimated completion date y= :i- =EMPLOYEESAND .tARt - . • .. __ . . - I. ma e. on :• . .. . 'ctua . Current number of employees fY , o/: /_,1-3/_ / ' s /3,3 Salaries /As5 bF /a-�/—?S {4A/.E.tJ.D,fe.yE/F.2/� 3 l Number of employees retained • . / I V Salaries . Number of additional employees Salaries SECTION4•:. . . • •*COWARD VALUES . .. -.--.. •As Estimated an SB T : . . _ .:Actual - ~ EIe'alEStateafidtttlp[ imittents~'. '.it `W -% _` a =` Cost Assessed Value • Cost Assessed Value Values before project _ .S/oS.P, S13 9 )6/Qt S 6/,o y' o58 273 ? /6le 66 D Plus: Values of proposed project $. . 00 00 O r 8 7S Y3 g 3. 6 4,!� 0/ 1) Less: Values of any property being replaced • j Net values upon completion of project 5,5 - 5-cc' d 73 9 /66, (o too 58, 5t3'4,'// />, S. 7) 6 70 Iltanufactun gEguipnient ?' .-"s - r Cost Ascs.zSed Value Cost Assessed Value Values before project Aj Plus: Values of proposed project _ / Less: Values of any property being replaced //�-J //619 • _ Net values upon completion of project 1 CT1ON 5 • • . •.'•:. .- OTHER BENEFITS PROMISED BY TAXPAYER.•:.�•:•-::•:=-..-•:•- --=:. As Estimated on SBA - •Actual•• •. T E aPA,oslo,fl ,1LLoWW S Les 7 //M/t/iJ7 / , �udN /f/q//E,e /., 116L, of t2/i5%,VE/. ,ietl/eE d/A).D ho 1701/1l/ So /t/EL7)ED f.27,4X//r)/ZE - /9vnl2.-//96i/.l ry 7I/F STi,<Es. T. /s 7/EL PEA --T/I/suRE 6/4 .. Ri Yr;7 E,cJ�" roPPoc�TuN1 77E.5/v• r�SuE,5 eo,U7st)czg� _ • 7SECTION 6• - - . . . -TAXPAYER CERTIFID'TION.. ..-. . Zie I hereby certify that the representations in this statement are true. Siature of authorized represent 've A Title Date signed(ma.,day,yr.) • 4 FOR-USE OFTHE DESIGNATING BODY` ' - - INSTRUCTIONS: (IC 6-1.1-12.1-5.9) 1. Within forty-five(45)days after receipt of this form, the designating body may determine whether or not the property owner has substantially complied P1 the Statement of Benefits. 2. If the property owner is found NOT to be in substantial compliance, the designating body shall send the property owner written notice. The notice mu. dude the reasons for the determination and the date,time and place of a hearing to be conducted by the designating body. If a notice is mailed to a I erty owner for new manufacturing equipment,a copy of the written notice shall be sent to the State Board of Tax Commissioners. 3. Based on the information presented at the hearing, the designating body shall determine whether or not the property owner has made reasonable elf( substantially comply with the Statement of Benefits. 4. If the designating body determines that the property owner has NOT made reasonable effort to comply, then the designating body shall adopt a resoi terminating the deduction. The designating body shall immediately mail a certified copy of the resolution to: (1)the property owner;(2)the CountyAui and(3)the State Board of Tax Commissioners. We have reviewed the CF-1 and find that: g the property owner IS in substantial compliance ❑ the property owner IS NOT in substantial compliance 0 other(specify) Reasons for the determination(attach additional sheets if necessary) Signature of authorized memb r /� Date signed(month,day,year) C (�. e�t1 April 13, 1999 �:Attested by: Designating body _,//YZ-(---& Greencastle Common Council If the property owner is found not to b- i suantial compliance,the property owner shall receive the opportunity for a hearing. The following date and time has been set aside for the purpose of considering compliance. Time of hearing Date of hearing Location of hearing ❑AM ❑PM HEARING RESULTS(to be completed after the hearing) ❑ Apprbred ❑ Denied (see instruction 4 above) Reasons for determination(attach additional sheets if necessary) Signature of authorized member Date signed(month,day,year) Attested by: Designating body APPEAL RIGHTS[IC 6-1.1-12.1-5.9(e)] A property owner whose deduction is denied by the designating body may appeal the designating body's decision by filing a complaint in the office of the Circuit or Superior Court together with a bond conditioned to pay the costs of the appeal if the appeal is determined against the property owner.