The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My Public Portal About15-2001-15 RESOLUTION NO. 2001 - /3 ' SCANNED A RESOLUTION AFFIRMING WAL-MART EAST, INC., OF COMPLIANCE WITH STATEMENTS OF BENEFITS WHEREAS, Wal-Mart East, Inc., (formerly known as Wal-Mart, Inc.) has heretofore been granted certain tax abatements in consideration of certain benefits for the City of Greencastle; and, WHEREAS, said company has submitted a form CF-1 as of January 17, 2001 for tax abatement granted in 1994; and WHEREAS, the Greencastle Common Council has reviewed the CF-1 form, a copy of which is attached hereto, and has found compliance with the Statements of Benefits as approved by the Greencastle Common Council; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Common Council of the City of Greencastle, Putnam County, Indiana, approves the CF-1 form as submitted as being in compliance with the Statements of Benefits previously filed by Wal-Mart East, Inc. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution of the Greencastle Common Council .--., be made a record and filed along with the CF-1 with the Putnam County Auditor. e("4-71--- COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GREENCASTLE C-......2‘.....e, 4),i/Z Norm Crampton Thomas Roach 7 al /te --0 —► -cam ark N. Hammer Mi e Rokicki ri44#.,eX/4 Joe Leic Approved and signed by me this 8th day of May, 2001 at 9 4,b'clock, p.m. r-t) . <-1C(, ' Nancy A. chael, Mayor AT S : J ,.d-L,--" Pamela S. Jones, Cl rk'T easurer r--, • . ". \, COMPLIANCE WITH STATEMENT OF BENEFITS FORM :l i}� State Form 44973(11-91) CF-i rt,___..-,4.•'±+' Prescribed by the State Board of Tax Commissioners,1991 � / The records in this series are CONFIDENTIAL according to IC 6-1.1-35-9.e,e INSTRUCTIONS: 1. Property owners whose Statement of Benefits was approved after July 1, 1991 must file this form with the County Auditor and the local Designating Body to show the extent to which there has been compliance with the Statement of Benefits. (This does not apply to •••-\ property located in a residentially distressed area). (iC 6-1.1-12.1-5.6) 2. If the deduction applies to Real Estate and Improvements, then this form must be filed with the initial deduction application and then annually within sixty(60)days after the end of each year in which the deduction is applicable. 3. For New Manufacturing Equipment,this form must be filed with Form 322 ERA/PP between March 1 and May 15 of each year,unless a filing extension under IC 6-1.1-3.7 has been granted. A person who obtains a filing extension must file between March 1 and June 14 of each year. ' :SECTION t. -..- . --: , ;_':TAXPAYER INFORMATION::-.. _ .- J Name of taxpayer z, )/9Z-/�A2T E, % 2'iiJ , • Address of taxpayer(street and number,city,state and ZiP code) • . / --,e!y�1( `05-.5-6 /set S /O�� 3 az Eri&A)7 1!�/L L r %/2, 7 7/4, --D 65S" Name of contact person Telephone number _ L////,CL.E6 M-7oti/, lZ (50/ )a7 -/IV/ _ SECTION 2 - :- • -` - • --:. -. - LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY = . ..- NAle of designating body Resolution nupnber ley iii •/>1 s%L E" C-/1Y e64,Afe./L /9� L_. / Location of property Co ty Taxing district 33 3 /rAi r� S i 4j/PF v�-1672 . -,d• 1714,/_56j %Al L21 y/CEeA/g,f}S%L E- Gdl Ty Description of real property Improvements and/or hew manufacturing equipment to be acquired Estimated starting date (0fi idt- &'// /M 472/thq /0' 4- /90-7)5.1) "D le. a Estimated completion date SECTION 3 •° EMPLOYEES AND SALARIES ' '': : - As Estimated on SB-1 . -•:Actual `: _r.a rent number of employees -4 0 F /c.- -/- abD 0 81 - Salaries ,q,-5 DP M-2 f- 400/) e, Lc;Ubt7/Z?/FR24 ci, 6-`/6 53-5- Number of employees retained • Salaries Number of additional employees Salaries SECTION 4 ::••- . :-COSTAND VALUES .. -• As Estimated on SB1 -•-= • • . Actual Real•Estateandlmprovement -777-:_` Cost Assessed Value Cost Assessed Value Values before project 41�o5-g), 8.73 7 /4,4 64,0 5 o5 ef73 914 5 6/D Plus: Values of proposed project �'F n oo o c?O r 8 3 7 y=3 e .', SO/ .&/U Less: Values of any property being replaced Net values upon completion of project 53..R 5P. g'73 f //06 6/,,( 53).43,1 RI/ i , �6, 97) Manufacturing Equipment ='- =' Cost ssessed Value Cost Assessed Value Values before project0j Plus: Values of proposed project /61///// Less: Values of any property being replaced _ • Net values upon completion of project • -SECTION S . • • OTHER BENEFITS PROMISED BY TAXPAYER.`•-• - lAs Estimated on SB-1 Actual• r-. r//E 6X /oAf Ai-Lows u5 70 /thvit mot, 4 Mad,/ /f/�HE,e 2.EU5Lr OF Ll�(sro/nE/ CRL)rOE AA)D /N �cr.UE So //ELPE1t AAA/n2/Z6: Ilv in.>9, iLlTy i 7f/E S72),e5.6 . TN/s N6/ /'Lb Zt/Su 2'E .Z4A1G win vifihiL/r/ of-He eEAJ1S, /t,t)a 4AsugE S C/o.aJ7 iU.E j c""in i•bYSY1 E,cr i 19>°/o27Z'A)r T/E S CTION 6 ` ' ' - TAXPAYER CERTIFICATION . • .. . I hereby certify that the representations in this statement are true. Sig -ture of authorized representative Title Date signed(mo.,day,yr.) L4A621-71t) �� §o flE,r"Yy 4 .�pr,),,d /-/l- 0 l • • -;-- • FOR USE OFTHE DESIGNATING BODY INSTRUCTIONS: (iC 6-1.1-12.1-5.9) 1. Within forty-five(45)days after receipt of this form, the designating body may determine whether or not the property owner has substantially complied with the Statement of Benefits. If the property owner is found NOT to be in substantial compliance, the designating body shall send the property owner written notice. The notice must in- clude the reasons for the determination and the date,time and place of a hearing to be conducted by the designating body. If a notice is mailed to a prop erty owner for new manufacturing equipment,a copy of the written notice shall be sent to the State Board of Tax Commissioners. 3. Based on the information presented at the hearing,the designating body shall determine whether or not the property owner has made reasonable effort tc substantially comply with the Statement of Benefits. • - 4. If the designating body determines that the properly owner has NOT made reasonable effort to comply, then the designating body shall adopt a resolutior terminating the deduction. The designating body shall immediately mail a certified copy of the resolution to: (1)the property owner;(2)the.County Auditor, and(3)the State Board of Tax Commissioners. • .. . • We have reviewed the CF-1 and find that: • ❑ the property owner IS in substantial compliance ❑ the property owner iS NOT in substantial compliance ' ❑ other(specify) Reasons for the determination(attach additional sheets if necessary) • Signature of authorized member Date signed(month,day,year) • Attested by: Designating body r'\ If the property owner is found not to be in substantial compliance,the property owner shall receive the opportunity for a hearing. The following date and time has been set aside for the purpose of considering compliance. Time of hearing Date of hearing Location of hearing ❑AM ❑PM ti y +` .,.sN IZI' BEAAIN tratfa eo 7.44. ie ffa ge,}hea 7nq is ❑Approved ❑ Denied (see instruction 4 above) Reasons for determination(attach additional sheets if necessary) • • Signature of authorized member Date signed(month,day,year) Attested by: Designating body NEW.AWANAIi � Mrt AP,gaiIGH7�1IG67i„12:;1;5:9` (e)1 property owner whose deduction is denied by the designating body may appeal the designating body's decision by filing a complaint n the office of the Circuit or Superior Court together with a bond conditioned to pay the costs of the appeal if the appeal is determined against the property owner.