HomeMy Public PortalAbout1977-009Member di9rel C ir^ I c introduced the following resolution
and moved its adoption:
CITY OF MEDINA
RESOLUTION NO. 7 /71-
RESOLUTION EXCEPTING PANGIER CONSOLIDATION:
WHEREAS, Charles Pa.ngier and Marilyn Pangier, husb nd and wife, are
the owners of real estate described as Lots 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13,
Block 7, Independence Beach, Hennepin County, said property being
5 separate parcels of record prior to the 16th day of March, 1976 and
WHEREAS, the said owners have made application to consolidate the
property as follows:
Parcel 1: Lots 12 and 13, Block 7, Independence Beach
Parcel 2: Lots 11 and the East one-half of Lot 10 Independence Beach
Parcel 3: Lot 9 and the west one-half of Lot 10, Independence Beach
WHEREAS, the proposed consolidated parcels are served by public sani-
tary sewer and water and the owner has requested a fair consolidation
of special assessments heretofor levied; and
WHEREAS, none of said property has previously been t'7e subject of a
division or consolidation under this ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the proposed consolidation will not require additional
streets; and
WHEREAS, a survey of the property, a sketch of the proposed consoli-
dation and a concise legal description have been filed as part of the
application;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Medina as follows:
(1) That the said consolidations are excepted from the
Platting Code,
Existing special assessments for public improvements
shall be assigned 50% thereof to Parcel 1 and 50%
thereof to Parcel 2,
Parcel 3 shall be assessed 82708.40 for sanitary sewer
and $1809.60 for public water in accordance with Medina
Resolution No. 75-37 and Minnesota Statutes 444.075,
et seq.
PROVIDED HOWEVER, that the applicant fulfill the following con-
ditions:
(1) Obtain a Land Combination/Division from the Hennepin
County Finance Department consistent herewith.
(2) Pay administrative fees in the amount of $50.00
PROVIDED FURTHER that no construction permits be issued for the
property until compliance with the foregoing conditions has been
demonstrated.
DATED: Tha 1, /q77
�yor
ATTEST:
Oy- //tip
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of e foregoing resolution was duly
seconded by member/i, dik r ether and upon vote being taken
Lexu P
thereon, the following voted in fav r of:
d�Tm(-4je. e , 7e i.5
C'rv54, 1e,6e '',
and the following voted against the same:
./L c /p e_
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.