Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout1978-009Member G[J/l/ iCc/r) 2e/SGr and moved its adoption: introduced .e following resolution CITY OF MEDINA RESOLUTION NO. 7/_ 9 RESOLUTION EXCEPTING HAYES AND COMPANY, INC. CONSOLIDATION WHEREAS, Hayes and Company, Inc. , a Minnesota Corporation, are the owners of real estate described as Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, Block 16, Indepen- dence Beach, Hennepin County, Minnesota, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the Office of the Register of Deeds in and for said Hennepin County, said property being five separate parcels of record prior to the 16th day of March, 1976; and WHEREAS, the said owner has made application to consolidate the property as follows: Parcel A: Lots 1, 2, and 3, except that part of said lots lying southerly of a line drawn from a point on the East line of said Lot 3, distant 80 feet south from the Northeast corner of said Lot 3 to a point on the Southwest- erly line of said Lot 1, distant 20 feet Northwesterly from the Southwesterly corner of said Lot 1, Block 16, "Independence Beach, Hennepin County, Minnesota'', according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the Office of the Re gister of Deeds in and for said Hennepin County. Parcel B: Lot 4 and that part of Lots 1, 2, and 3, lying Southerly of a line drawn from a point on the East line of said Lot 3, distant 80 feet South from the Northeast corner of said Lot 3 to a point on the Southwesterly line of said Lot 1, distant 20 feet Northwesterly from the Southwesterly corner of said Inot 1, Block 16, "Independence Beach, Hennepin County, Minnesota", according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the Office of the Re gister of Deeds in and for said Hennepin County. Parcel C: Lot 5, Block 16, "Independence Beach, Hennepin County, Minne- sota",according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the Office of the Register of Deeds in and for said Hennepin County. WHEREAS, the proposed consolidated parcels are served by public sanitary sewer and water and the owners have requested a fair consolidation of special assessments heretofor levied; and WHEREAS, none of said property has previously been the subject of a divi- sion or consolidation under this ordinance; and and WHEREAS, the proposed consolidation will not require additional streets; WHEREAS, a survey of the property, a sketch of the proposed consolida- tion and a concise legal description have been filed as part of the application; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Medina as follows: (1) That the said consolidations are excepted from the Platting Code; (2) Variances are hereby granted from the minimum frontage require- ments on all parcels to permit construction on said parcels as sub- mitted to the City Council. (3) A practical difficulty exists in that the original surveys of Independence Beach contain ambiguities and uncertainties making it impossible to reconcile the survey lines with the lot lines established by long usage, and the unusual shape of the lots create a hardship when the ordinance setbacks are imposed; (4) Existing special assessments for public improvements shall be assigned as follows: (a) Each parcel shall bear an equal portion of the total assess- ments levied and remaining unpaid upon all property set out in the first paragraph of this Resolution. (b) In addition to the assessments noted in (4) (a) above, each parcel shall bear an additional 2/9ths of an assessable unit for water and 2/9ths of an assessable unit for sewer in accordance with and as defined in the Medina Resolution No. 75-37 and MSA §444. 075. (c) The assessments for each lot, as set out herein, shall be paid prior to the issuing of a building permit for each such lot. PROVIDED HOWEVER, that this Resolution shall be conditioned upon the following requirements: (1) The applicant shall obtain a land combination from the Hennepin County Finance Department consistent herewith; (2) The applicant shall pay an administrative fee in the amount of $ (3) No construction permits shall be issued for Parcels A, B, or C until compliance with the foregoing conditions has been demonstrated. 7 ,citi ! /9 7f Date ATTEST: /2t} City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in avor of: cwu -e e. e�-a,/ ,-/e,e , and the following voted a ainst the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.