Loading...
HomeMy Public PortalAbout1970 Decision_201502171550545951 Town d watrfown =1fl, aarb of Appeala The Board of Appeals of the Town of Watertown hereby gives notice that it has this day filed in the office of the Town Clerk a copy of its decision in the matter of the petition of Margaret Elizabeth Cloherty of 14 Morse Street, Watertown, Massachusetts requesting the Board of Appeals of the Town of Watertown to issue to her a permit to occupy and use as a professional office for electrolysis treatments one room to be utilized as waiting room and one room fox treatment room the premises 14 Morse Street, Watertown, Massachusetts, For the reasons set forth in said decision the Petition has been GRANTED, THOMAS J. McDERMOTt� Chairman SALVATOPP, CICCARELLIy Acting Clerk (Alt, Member) GEORGE K. WALKER JR. Atl, Member lowly of Ivoftrtown oarb of Oppealo December 17, 1970 George B. Wellman, Town Clerk ministration Building Re:Cloherty, Margaret Eliza Watertown Na 02172 14 Mose Street Date of Hearing July 14, 1970 Date of Deision December 1, 1970 Dear Sir: This matter came on to be heard before the Board of Appeals on Tuesday Evening, July 140 1970 in the Lower Hearing Room in the Administration Building, Main Street, Watertown, Massachusetts. Due notice of the hearing was given to persons deemed affected and publication had in a newspaper of general circulation in Watertown. Present andsitting were: Thomas J. McDermott, Chairman; Salvatore Ciccarelli, Acting Clerk (Alternate Member; and George K. Walker Jr. , Alternate Member. MroCiccerelli read the petition of Margaret Elizabeth Cloherty of 14 Morse Street, Wiertown, Massachusetts requesting the Board of Appeals to issue to her a permit to occupy and use as a professional office for electrolysis treatments, One room to be utilized for treatment room, the premises 14 Morse Street, Wkertown Massachusetts. Margaret Elizabeth Cloherty of 14 Morse Street, Watertown, Massachusetts appeared pro-se. Mr. McDermott questioned just what her type of work includes. According to Miss Cloherty it is permanent removal of hairs from the body, moles, warts etc and treatments000she stated this is done electrically. Mr, McDermott questioned the requirements to do this type of workoo.according to Miss Cloherty she is a registered electrolysis, through the State. The question was asked if there would be any structural change to the dwelling000according to the petitioner there would be noneo .00ne room would be used for an office and one for a treatment room. i Mr, McDermott questioned the number of people she would have at one time. o.according to the petit®oner not more than two (2). Re: Cloherty, Margaret Elizabeth 14 Morse Street The question was asked the length of time it would take for a treatment.. -Miss Cloherty stated it varieso . .£rom one-half to one hour, maybe two hours. She stated the maximum number of people waiting at one time would be two (2)...she stated the parking would be in thetdriveway. Mr.McDermott questioned if there would be any additional electrical installation required..oaccording toMiss Cloherty there wouldn't and there wouldn't be any neighborhood interference. Mr. McDermott asked about the hours..eMiss Cloherty stated she intends to operate Saturday's 9:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M.... the latest hours would be 9:0 to 10:00 P.M. Mr. Walker questioned the number of cars that could be parked.. actor ding to the petitioner there will be parking for two (2) cars. MroWalker also asked what alterations would be necessary. The petitioner stated there would be no exterior or interior alterations necessary. Miss Cloherty was questioned if she intends to erect a sign... the petitioner stated she intends to have a non-illuminating sign about 20" x 20". Captain Kelly of the Fire Department had no objection to the reiquest. Mr.McCarthy of the Planning Board registered no objection. Mr. McDermott declared the hearing closed.othe Board will taker: the matter under advisement. The Board of Appeals aft er due deliberation and consideration of the evidence, a review of the pertinent provisionss of law and by-law and taking a view of the premises and thelarea in which they are located finds the facts to be as setiforth in the record above and finds that the proposed site is appropriate for use and occupation as professional office for electrolysis treatment as proposed that such use and occupation will not adversely affect the neighborhood that there will be no nuisance or serious hazard to vehicles or pedestrians and that adequate and appropriate facilities will be provided for the proper operation of slid premises as and for said purpose. _2- Re: Cloherty# Margaret Elizabeth 14 Morse Street WHEREFORE: The Board of Appeals VOTE Unanimously that the petition herein for Special Permit be and the same is hereby approved, and the Inspector of Buildings of Watertown is hereby directed to issue to the petitioner a Special Permit as requested. By the Board j THOMAS J. hDERMOTT' Chairman • SALVATORE CICCARELLI, Acting Clerk / Alt. Memo GEORGE W ALICER JR. Ae Mem. Attest: .. . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . ... Acting Clerk _g_ 14 & 16 Morse Street Site Plan Special Permit Amendment for a Home Occupation February 6, 2015 MORSE STREET 1 50. a wo�t 7-o Sctil.� I