HomeMy Public PortalAbout17-2009-17 RESOLUTION NO. 2009 - 17 SCANNED
•
A RESOLUTION AFFIRMING
HEARTLAND AUTOMOTIVE LLC (2003 Expansion)
OF COMPLIANCE WITH STATEMENTS OF BENEFITS
WHEREAS,Heartland Automotive LLC has heretofore been granted certain tax abatements
in consideration of certain benefits for the City of Greencastle; and,
WHEREAS,said company has submitted a form CF-1/PP as of July 20,2009 and corrected
said form as of August 6, 2009 for tax abatement granted in 2003; and
WHEREAS, the Greencastle Common Council has reviewed the CF-1/PP form, a copy of
which is attached hereto,and has found compliance with the Statements of Benefits as approved by
the Greencastle Common Council;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Common Council of the City of
Greencastle, Putnam County, Indiana, approves the CF-1/PP form as submitted as being in
compliance with the Statements of Benefits previously filed by Heartland Automotive LLC.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution of the Greencastle Common Council be
made a record and filed along with the CF-1/PP form with the Putnam County Auditor.
PASSED by the Common Council of the City of Greencastle at its regular meeting this 1 lth
day of August, 2009.
COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GREENCASTLE INDIANA
Gam/(
insie S. Bingham Adam Cohen
/ 4..K91/ 1P4ki 'or, 44,24 tit C- 4,,,7 240, ,-4-(1) -64
M N. Hammer PhRoss Ro icki
-.) tO
2.:)
Terry J. i
Approved and signed by me this 11th day of August, 2009 at ,iks p.m. o'clock.
---- 2....A.) .
I A EST:
Susan V. Murray, Mayor
116) -tims
Teresa Glenn, Clerk-Treasurer
Mt sr�r�
j COMPLIANCE WITH STATEMENT OF BENEFITS FORM CF-1 /PP
1' PERSONAL PROPERTY
State Form 51765(R/1-06)
/ea Prescribed by the Department of Local Government Finance
a
INSTRUCTIONS: 1. Property owners whose Statement of Benefits was approved must file this form with the local Designating Body to show the extent
to which there has been compliance with the Statement of Benefits. (IC 6-1.1-12.1-5.6)
2. This form must be filed with the Form 103-ERA Schedule of Deduction from Assessed Value between March 1,and May 15,of each
year, unless a filing extension under IC 6-1.1-3.7 has been granted. A person who obtains a filing extension must file between
March 1,and the extended due date of each year.
3. With the approval of the designating body,compliance information for multiple projects may be consolidated on one(1)compliance
(CF-1).
SECTION 1 TAXPAYER INFORMATION
Name of taxpayer
HEARTLAND AUTOMOTIVE,LLC
Address of taxpayer(number and street,city,state,and ZIP code)
300 S WARREN DRIVE, GREENCASTLE, IN 46135
Name of contact person Telephone number
M SUE KREBS (765)653-4263
SECTION 2 LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
Name of designating body Resolution number
GREENCASTLE COMMON COUNCIL 2003-16&40
Location of property County DLGF taxing district number
SAME PUTNAM 67008
Description of new manufacturing equipment,or new research and development equipment,or new information technology Estimated starting date(month,day,year)
equipment,or new logistical distribution equipment to be acquired. 09/01/2003
SEE ATTACHED LIST FOR EQUIPMENT Estimated completion date(month,day,year)
09/01/2004
SECTION 3 EMPLOYEES AND SALARIES
EMPLOYEES AND SALARIES AS ESTIMATED ON SB-1 ACTUAL
Adoms,Current number of employees 444.00 426
Salaries 12,233,000.00 14,195,000.00
Number of employees retained 444.00 426
Salaries 12,233,000.00 1a,195,000.00
Number of additional employees 40.00 0
Salaries
832,000.00 0.00
SECTION 4 COST AND VALUES
MANUFACTURING R&D EQUIPMENT LOGIST DIST IT EQUIPMENT
EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT
AS ESTIMATED ON SB-1 COST ASSESSED ASSESSED ASSESSED ASSESSED
VALUE COST VALUE COST VALUE COST VALUE
Values before project 42,522,000.00
Plus: Values of proposed project 11,000,000.00
Less: Values of any property being replaced
Net values upon completion of project 53,522,000.00
ACTUAL COST ASSESSED COST ASSESSED COST ASSESSED COST ASSESSED
VALUE VALUE VALUE VALUE
Values before project 42,522,000.00
Plus: Values of proposed project 11,057,386.00
Less: Values of any property being replaced
Net values upon completion of project 53,579,386.00
NOTE:The COST of the property is confidential pursuant to IC 6-1.1-12.1-5.6(d).
SECTION 5 WASTE CONVERTED AND OTHER BENEFITS PROMISED BY THE TAXPAYER
WASTE CONVERTED AND OTHER BENEFITS AS ESTIMATED ON SB-1 ACTUAL
Amount of solid waste converted
Amount of hazardous waste converted
Other benefits:
SECTION 6 TAXPAYER CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the representations in this statement are true.
Si nature of autho ed representat' e Title Date signed(month,day,year)
ALk ACCOUNTING MANAGER 06/11/2009
•
OPTIONAL: FOR USE BY A DESIGNATING BODY WHO ELECTS TO REVIEW THE COMPLIANCE WITH STATEMENT OF BENEFITS(FORM CF-1)
THAT WAS APPROVED AFTER JUNE 30,1991.
'NSTRUCTIONS: (IC 6-1.1-12-5.9)
1. This page does not apply to a Statement of Benefits filed before July 1, 1991;that deduction may not be terminated for a failure to comply with the Statement
of Benefits.
2. Within forty-five(45)days after receipt of this form,the designating body may determine whether or not the property owner has substantially complied with
the Statement of Benefits.
3. If the property owner is found NOT to be in substantial compliance,the designating body shall send the property owner written notice. The notice must include
the reasons for the determination and the date,time and place of a hearing to be conducted by the designating body.If a notice is mailed to a property owner,
a copy of the written notice will be sent to the Township Assessor and the County Auditor.
4. Based on the information presented at the hearing,the designating body shall determine whether or not the property owner has made reasonable effort to
substantially comply with the Statement of Benefits.
5. If the designating body determines that the property owner has NOT made reasonable effort to comply,then the designating body shall adopt a resolution
terminating the deduction. The designating body shall immediately mail a certified copy of the resolution to:(1)the property owner;(2)the County Auditor;
and(3)the Township Assessor.
We have reviewed the CF-1 and find that:
❑✓ the property owner IS in substantial compliance
❑the property owner IS NOT in substantial compliance
❑other(specify)
Reasons for the determination(attach additional sheets if necessary)
Signature of authorized member Date signed(month,day,year)
Susan V. Murray-M yor . 08/11/2009
Attested by: � t ` Designating body
Teresa Glenn-C e .
resurer ` Greencastle ity until(CF-1/PP)
If the property owner is found not to be in substantial compliance,the property owner shall recei he o ortunity for a hearing.The following date and
time has been set aside for the purpose of considering compliance.
Time of hearing ❑AM Date of hearing(month,day,year) Location of hearing
PM
HEARING RESULTS(to be completed after the hearing)
❑ Approved Denied(see instruction 5 above)
Reasons for the determination(attach additional sheets if necessary)
Signature of authorized member Date signed(month,day,year)
Attested by: Designating body
APPEAL RIGHTS(IC 6-1.1.12.1.5.9(e)]
A property owner whose deduction is denied by the designating body may appeal the designating body's decision by filing a complaint in the office of the
Circuit or Superior Court together with a bond conditioned to pay the costs of the appeal if the appeal is determined against the property owner.